Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-03-24 CPC PacketSiillwater THE B I R T H P L A C E O F M I N N E S OT A PLEASE NOTE (NEW FOR 2021): Planning Commission meetings are streamed live on the city website and available to view on Channel 16. Public can participate by logging into https://www.zoomgov.com or by calling 1-646-828-7666 and enter the meeting ID number: 160 877 9021 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 24th, 2021 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of February 24th, 2021 regular meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Resolution CPC 2021-02: Adopting Written Statement of Reasons for Denial CPC Case No. 2020-01.- Tabled from the February meeting VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS - The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item. 3. Case No. 2021-06: Consideration of a Variance to the front yard setback to build a larger front stoop on the property. Property located at 1221 1st St S in the RB district. Traci Post, property owner. 4. Case No. 2021-08: Consideration of a Variance to the lot's impervious surface coverage, in order to install a pool. Property located at 1910 Oak Glen trail in the RA district. Jennine Lundquist, property owner. 5. Case No. 2021-09: Consideration of a Special Use Permit for outdoor dining on an exterior patio and its proposed addition. Property located at 102 2nd Street N in the CDB district. Tim Siegfried, applicant and 102 2nd LLC, property owner. 6. Case No. 2021-11: Consideration of a Variance to the exterior side yard setback. Property located at 1312 Broadway St N in the RA district. Richard and Colleen Muske, property owners. 7. Case No. 2021-12: Consideration of a Special Use Permit for outside storage. Property located at 127 Main St S in the CBD district. Buettner Real Estate, property owner. 8. Case No. 2021-13: Consideration of a 6 lot Preliminary Plat and Rezoning. Property located at 8483 Marylane Ave N in the AP district. JAM Freedom LLC, applicant and Mark and Marlene Pavlick, property owners. VII. DISCUSSION VIII. FYI — STAFF UPDATES IX. ADJOURNMENT The Birthplace of Minnesota 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES February 24th, 2021 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairman Dybvig called the meeting to order via Zoom at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chair Dybvig, Commissioners Hansen, Kocon, Steinwall, Councilmember Odebrecht Absent: Commissioner Meyhoff and Lauer Staff: City Planner Wittman and Bill Turnblad APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of January 27th, 2021 regular meeting Motion by Councilman Odebrecht, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to approve the minutes of the January 27th, 2021 meeting as amended. All in favor, 5-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Resolution CPC 2021-02: Adopting Written Statement of Reasons for Denial CPC Case No. 2020-01. Staff and Commissioners had questions regarding how to handle the vote regarding this resolution. They would like to table this item to the next meeting so they can confer with the City Attorney. Motion to table by Chairman Dybvig, seconded by Steinwall. All in favor, 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2020-60: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit and associated Variances for a residential building in the Central Business Height Overlay Historic District. Property located at 200 Chestnut St. Joel Hauck, applicant and Chestnut Partners, LLC, property owner. City Planner Wittman reviewed the application from 200 Chestnut Partners LLC, owner of the property at 200 Chestnut East and is proposing to redevelop the site with a four-story, 61-unit apartment building with 73 underground parking spaces. In addition to holding a neighborhood meeting prior to the application submittal, the applicant participated in a Technical Review meeting with local agencies and organizations to gain insight on how the proposed project conforms to local regulations. The project proposed to the Planning commission (PC) reflects those regulations; where variations occur or conditions are recommended for conformance, they are outlined within the report. Ms. Wittman explained that residential uses, as well as Large Building Projects, in the Central Business District (CBD) require a Conditional Special Use Permit. The proposed fourth story, jointly with the building's overall 48.5' height, exceeds the maximum allowable Planning Commission February 24, 2021 three -stories and 37' height in the Historic Height Overlay District. The applicant is requesting variances to the City's CBD Setbacks, the Height Overlay standards, and the Off - Street Parking and Loading requirements. Given the scope and location of the project as well as the proposed height is 10% greater than the maximum allowable limit, City Code requires the PC make recommendation for City Council (Council). Ms. Wittman went on to report that approval of a Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) Design Permit is required prior to Council consideration. On December 16, 2020 the HPC reviewed a Design Permit application for the property that contained a recessed fourth story that included a mix of residential units, enclosed common space, and rooftop terracing. Citing the project's need to conform to the mass and scale of buildings in its vicinity (including the adjacent Stillwater Commercial Historic District), the HPC tabled consideration of the design, requesting modifications to the scale of the fourth story - if not full removal. On January 20, 2021 the applicant obtained conditional approval of a Design Permit application from the HPC though the HPC's conditioned the approval with no fourth story. The applicant has appealed the HPC's decision to the City Council. The design presented to the PC contains a fourth story though the vertical improvements are recessed from most right-of-ways. On February 18, 2021 the applicant met with the Downtown Parking Commission (DTPC), and advisory body to the Council, to discuss the request for a parking variance. The applicant is proposing to create 73 off-street spaces, leaving a 35 space deficit, and utilizing an on -street parking space for loading and unloading. As a reminder to the PC, City Code allows for mitigation of parking (by payment in lieu of parking creation) in areas with zero lot lines or similar conditions. The DTPC indicated that, with certain conditions, they believe the development could still conform to the intent of the Off -Street Parking and Loading regulations. They recommend Council allow the developer to pay a fee in lieu of creating 35 parking spaces. Their conditions surrounded around requiring off-street spaces to be dedicated to the residential units so that only guests are utilizing the public parking system. The applicant is requesting consideration of a (1) Conditional Use Permit for 61 multi -family residences in a Large building project in the CBD Zoning District; (2) A 35 space variance to the Off -Street Parking and Loading requirements; (3) A one-story variance to the three- story maximum height in the Central Business District Historic Height Overlay District; (4) A 11.5' variance to the 37' maximum allowable height in the Central Business District Historic Height Overlay District; (5) Variances to the 20' (Combined) Side Yard and 20' Rear Yard Setback in the Central Business District. Commissioner Hansen asked whether there is a condition regarding outdoor noise. Ms. Wittman responded traditionally we add conditions to commercial Conditional Use Permits with outside events, however, it is unlikely in this situation. Commissioner Steinwall requested Ms. Wittman provide more explanation regarding the requested Variance to the parking regulations; and Ms. Wittman explained the proposed building is required to have 108 parking spaces, but is only proposing 73. The conditions would require the developer to build the 73 underground parking spaces and assign 1 to each unit. They would then be required to pay a fee for the 35 parking space deficit. Commissioner Hansen questioned if there was any proposed change to Union Alley as a one- way street, and would the open parking on that street be changed? Ms. Wittman responded that no consideration was given to using Union Alley as a parking permit zone only in the downtown lots. The traffic study from SRF found that the traffic would not be negatively Page 2 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 affected by the change. The proposed project would have 12 excess parking spots to accommodate the units that have more than one car. Mr. Nick Walton, President of Reuter Walton Development, owner of the site, gave some background how they received feedback regarding this project and have effectively addressed negative aspects. He addressed Commissioner Hansen concerns regarding outdoor noise, and was open to the idea of an additional condition, but also stated they would have management rules in place as well to help mitigate the noise. Mr. Bob Loken gave a presentation and pointed out the parking study was based on the larger building, so the 35 parking space deficit would be less. The context of the building design was based on the industrial aesthetic buildings, which are common on building further from Main Street. Mr. Loken added that while they are proposing a fourth story, there are other buildings with similar heights within the downtown. Mr. Walton expressed they have put as many parking spots within the basement as they could. As the water table is directly under the property, they were not able to build any additional going down. Mr. Walton discussed the new addition at the Water Street Inn and pointed out the various heights of that building compared to their proposed building. He also stated that without the three units on the fourth floor the project cannot proceed due to financial reasons. Mr. Loken went through and summarized the changes to the proposal since the December 16th, 2020 and January 20th, 2021 meetings. Councilmember Odebrecht agreed with Staff on the need for housing and he thought the parking situation was resolved. He questioned the Short Term Home Rental number used, and thought a higher number, such as ten would better support the community via tourism and building. Mr. Walton responded that the they were open to the number Short Term Home Rental units allowed. They would be comfortable with 2-6 units, or 10% of the total number of units. Councilmember Odebrecht asked the applicants to explain why they need the fourth story; and Mr. Walton explained the suites on the fourth floor are an essential financial reasons. Councilmember Odebrechet asked Ms. Wittman to clarify whether the elevator bump out could exceed the height regulations; and she stated as the elevator is an integral part of the building it would be allowed to exceed the height restriction. Commissioner Steinwall requested that the height of the elevator and stairwells will still be higher than the fourth story; and Mr. Loken explained the life safety reasoning behind the layout of the fourth story. Mr. Walton indicated that the prior meetings had not shown the detail of the glass hallway. Chairman Dybvig opened the public hearing. Ms. Kim Nelson representing the North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters (NCSRCC), stated the project and current design is reasonable and the construction of this project will provide jobs for laborers, many of whom live in Minnesota and the Stillwater community. During the COVID pandemic a project this size would provide jobs for the Page 3 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 community. She asked the Commission to approve this application in its current state with the fourth floor. Mr. Hunter Sanders, Emerson Ave, stated as a construction worker himself during the COVID pandemic, this project would provide much needed jobs for many community members. Mr. Matthew Wolf owner of 107 Chestnut St E, pointed out the Height Overlays are there for a reason and the other buildings within the district were made to comply. Mr. Steve and Mrs. Diane Middleton, Newgate Ave N. questioned the applicant on whether they were going to provide a dog relief area for those living within the complex; and Mr. Loken replied that there is not a plan at this point, but they would prefer the residents to use the neighborhood to better interact with the community. Mr. Walton said they could be flexible if need be to accommodate that, including bags in the lobby. Chairman Dybvig closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kocon is okay with the setback requests it fits with the character of the downtown, is okay with the use permit for multifamily. He feels the issues lie with the request for the extra story, the height variance for the fourth story, and parking. He was surprised by the lack of outcry from the neighbors regarding parking. As the Parking Commission believes they have resolved the parking issue, his main issues are the extra story and the height Variance. Commissioner Hansen stated there are tall buildings within the downtown and we are trying to avoid that so that 10-20 years down the road we don't regret approving them. His main issue is parking. He does not think 1 spot per unit is enough. If we were to add this large of a project downtown, it might strain the already strained parking downtown. He would like to see this project go through, however is not comfortable with the parking variance. He stated he is in support of the Use Permit as long as the project fits in well. Commissioner Steinwall praised the applicant and developer for working with the community members, taking the character of the town into account when designing the building. She stated this project would be a good addition to the downtown and help keep the downtown alive and vibrant. She agreed with the exploration of the pet relief area. Steinwall also agreed the setback variances were not a concern for her, however, the fourth floor and height were a concern. She did not believe the applicant made a case for practical difficulty aside from economics. She stated she would consider increase in the Short Term Home Rental allowance. Councilmember Odebrecht agreed the height and fourth story are the most concerning. He asked Ms. Wittman to clarify the parking requirements again; and Ms. Wittman clarified the parking study was based a higher number of units then now proposed, and the proposed project meets the low end of the threshold range suggested in the parking study. The project will also provide an additional 12 spaces, and mitigating the remaining deficit through the parking system. Councilmember Odebrecht stated then he does not have a concern with parking. There are very few places within the downtown where younger families and younger people will be able to rent and therefore this property presents a unique opportunity for that aspect. He Page 4 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 stated Slide 15 demonstrated this was not going to change the character of downtown. He suggested the Short Term Home Rental number increased to 6 units. Chairman Dybvig echoed the comments of the others, the concerns are the height and the extra story. He does not see the practical difficulty for those. He asked Ms. Wittman to clarify the parking variance; and Ms. Wittman stated if the parking variance is approved, they will not need to mitigate the deficit of parking. Instead, if the Planning Commission were to approved the parking mitigation plan, they will need to follow the conditions suggested by the Downtown Parking Commission. Chairman Dybvig suggested they go with the parking mitigation plan, rather than the variance to the parking. Commissioner Kocon agreed the building is well designed aesthetically. He pointed out the building is up against a bluff so there is a difference in view regarding that. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall, to approve a Conditional Use Permit for a 58-unit residential building, a 3 story/ 2.5' Variance, Variances to the setbacks, the Parking mitigation plan as proposed, and raising the Short Term Home Rental to 6 units. Commissioner Hansen stated there is no noise ordinance conditions listed. He is concerned about the economic considerations and affects regarding the development. As affordable housing is needed within Stillwater, if there is no fourth story allowed, would the prices of the units jump too high and become unaffordable. He stated perhaps this is a greater discussion that should be had. Commissioner Kocon stated based on the location of the building, he does not think there will be anything but market based apartments. Commissioner Hansen clarified that he did not mean low priced apartments, however, a jump of approximately $400 more a month in rent is a large amount and could make it unaffordable for most. Councilmember Odebrecht agreed and he trusts the developers number are correct and the motion as it stands could effectively kill the project. Chairman Dyvbig suggested finding a middle ground by allowing 61-units, but no fourth story. Commissioner Kocon agreed to the amendment of 61-units. Commissioner Steinwall as the seconder also agreed to the amendment. Chairman Dybvig and Ms. Wittman discussed the general conditions added to permits. No amplified music being a condition often used. Commissioner Kocon amended the motion to list 10 p.m. City quiet hours and no outdoor amplified music allowed. Commissioner Steinwall agreed with the motion amendment. Ms. Wittman repeated the current motion stating recommendation of approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a 61-unit residential multifamily building, a 3 story/ 2.5' Variance, Variances to the setbacks, with staff recommended conditions which includes the Page 5 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Parking mitigation plan as proposed. Condition #3 to listed up to 10% of the unit allowed for Short Term Home Rental, and an additional condition to read City quiet hours at 10 p.m. and no outside amplified music allowed. Councilmember Odebrehct question if they are not allowed a fourth story, how could they have a roof top terrace. Ms. Wittman said those are allowed to project above a roof line. Roof top terraces are common downtown. Chairman Dybvig stated it would be similar to the Water Street Inn. Motion passes 4-1. Commissioner Hansen voting nay. Commissioner Hansen wanted the record to reflect that he was in favor of the project, but does not think the parking was adequately addressed and therefore he voting against the motion. Case No. 2021-02: Consideration of a Variance associated with a future re -subdivision for the property located at 819 William St N in the RB district. Michael Russ, property owner. Chairman Dybvig stated that his residence was within the noticing parameters and therefore asked the applicant if he would prefer the Chair recuse himself from the discussion and vote. Mr. Michael Russ, applicant, stated he had no objection to the Chair remaining in the discussion and vote. Ms. Wittman stated that Mr. Russ owns the 15,000 sf property at 819 William St North and is looking to split his lot into two 7,500 sf lots. However, if the lot were to be split, the existing house would then fall within the newly created 25' rear yard setback. While the house would meet all the other setbacks, a variance to the rear yard setback would have to be approved prior the City Council's consideration of a re -subdivision. The applicant is requesting a 3.5' variance to City Code Section 31-308. (b)(1) to allow a house to be setback 21.5' from the rear yard lot line, whereas the required setback is 25 feet. Ms. Wittman stated staff talked with neighbor Dana Jackson who has concerns about storm water and run off. Ms. Wittman stated that if this re -subdivision is approved and a home is built, it would be required to adhere to the Middle St. Croix Watershed's impervious surface and infiltration requirements. Those requirements could potentially improve the current drainage situation. Mr. Michael Russ, property owner stated he did not have comments or questions for staff. Commissioner Kocon inquired if the large tree was on the current property or will it be a part of the proposed new lot; and Mr. Russ replied that the large tree is located within the current home's lot and no removal would be necessary. The side yard setback on the new lot should not affect the tree. Chairman Dybvig opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman Dybvig closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Hansen, seconded by Councilmember Odebrecht, to approve Case No. 2021-02, a 3.5' variance to City Code Section 31-308. (b). (1). to allow a house to be setback Page 6 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 21.5' from the rear yard lot line, with the staff recommended conditions. All in favor. Motion passes 5-0. Case No. 2021-03: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat, Concept PUD, and Zoning Map Amendment and variances associated thereto for the property located at 13187 Dellwood Rd N, in the AP district. Integrity Land Development, applicant, and Gary and June Jorgensen, property owners. Community Development Director Turnblad stated Todd Ganz, Integrity Land Development, LLC, is proposing to develop 4.19 acres of land that currently includes two parcels with a home on each. These parcels are located at 13187 Dellwood Road North (State Hwy 96) and 2384 Oak Glen Trail. About half of the property (2.02 acres) lies within the Natural Environment Shoreland District of South Twin Lake (see Map A). On these 2.02 acres, development must either be on one acre lots or must occur as a Shoreland Planned Unit Development (PUD). A shoreland PUD allows increased density if: 1) at least 50% of the site remains in commonly owned permanent open space; 2) densities are shifted away from the protected lake; 3) emphasis is placed on protecting the natural resources of the site, such as trees and water basins; and 4) no more than 25% of the site is improved with impervious surfaces. The developer has chosen to develop the entire site as a PUD, and the western 2.02 acres according to Shoreland PUD standards. In order to develop the property as proposed, the applicant has requested approval of the following: (1) Rezone the property at 13187 Dellwood Road from AP, Agricultural Preservation to RB, Two -Family Residential; (2) Concept PUD for a 12-lot development plan (includes both existing parcels); (3) Preliminary Plat of HEIFORT HILLS ESTATE 2nd ADDITION, an 11-lot residential development (not including the existing lot at 2384 Oak Glen Trail, which is already platted); (4) Variance from the minimum allowed setback distance from State Highway 96 in order to build new houses as close as 45 feet from the standardized right-of-way, rather than the 100 feet required. Commissioner Steinwall asked if we needed to obtain an easement for the private driveway that intersects with Highway 96; and Mr. Turnblad answered that it should be added to the list of conditions. Councilmember Odebrecht requested clarification on the rezoning. He noted the proposed zoning/density is not in line with the Oak Glen Neighborhood but is more consistent with the original Heifort Hills Development to the west. However, the road will not go that direction, it will go through the Oak Glen Neighborhood. He asked if there was a different zoning district that could be used which would fit the Oak Glen Neighborhood better; and Mr. Turnblad responded that the proposed zoning district is not consistent with the development to the west, Heifort Hills. There are other zoning districts, however, the Comp Plan guides for higher densities. Councilmember Odebrecht asked would we have made different decisions in the past regarding the Comp Plan if we have known this high density area would connect to a low density neighborhood; and Mr. Turnblad stated he did not know for sure. However, due to the Shoreland district requirements the eastern portion of the proposed development must have greater open space. Commissioner Steinwall wanted clarification to the concept plan shown; and Mr. Turnblad explained the cross hatching to be ponds and the 'Y' turn around to be "grass-crete." Page 7 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Commissioner Hansen asked if we needed a condition stating a 15' requirement between homes as recommended; and Mr. Turnblad stated a condition requiring 15' between homes should be added to the condition list. Commissioner Hansen also noted, condition number 4 requires a minimum of 10 feet from back of curb to home, and asked if that was met by the current PUD; and Mr. Turnblad replied that the 10' from back of curb requirement has been met or could be met by shifting the buildings to the west and be accommodated. Commission Hansen then asked if the PUD met the 'y' turn around requirements for a fire truck to turn around in; and Mr. Turnblad stated that the Deputy Fire chief has not looked at the revised plan, however, he did provide the template of what is required. If this plan does not meet the requirements, the final plat will not be approved. Commissioner Hansen asked if we can add a condition for the "grass-crete" be maintained; and Mr. Turnblad answered that we can add that condition and that the homeowner's association will be required to maintain the road and grass-crete, except for the area in Lot 8, where the property owner will be responsible for maintaining that portion. The developer and his engineer suggested we use pervious concrete or pervious bituminous in these areas. It is easier to maintain grass-crete, but the pervious concrete of permious bituminous is harder to monitor if is being maintained. Commissioner Hansen asked who will be included in the private road easement agreement; and Mr. Turnblad explained that everything in the outlot that will be owned by the HOA. Across the HOA outlot and the property at 2384 Oak Glen Trail there will be an easement for the private road and for maintenance agreement. Commissioner Hansen asked for clarification on private utilities; and Mr. Turnblad replied that water and sewer lines for the Heifort Hills Estate first addition, will come across the south portion of the property and loop into the Oak Glen Neighborhood. From that line, private water and sewer lines will be run to access the neighborhood. The private lines will be taken care of by the homeowner's association and the public lines will have an easement. The water and the sewer will be municipal water and sewer. Commissioner Kocon clarified that the existing house at 13187 (Lot 7) and Lot 8 will utilize a shared driveway that accesses 96 right onto a right turn lane. The other 9 will be utilizing the shared road. He questioned by not add an impervious road that connects to the driveway with a knock down barrier, which would seem easier for emergency vehicles and safer; and Mr. Turnblad stated the Deputy Fire Chief must have a minimum of a 25 feet wide roadway to get out of the neighborhood and the driveway for 13187 is skinny to save on impervious surfacing. Councilmember Odebrecht asked whether the home at 2384 Oak Glen Trail would be moved; and Mr. Turnblad stated if the private road stays where it is currently proposed, the home would stay in its location. If the road where to split the lot, the home would need to be moved. He stated some developers in the past have done successful house moves. Councilmember Odebrecht asked if it were possible to create a buffer between this new proposed neighborhood and the Oak Glen Neighborhood; and Mr. Turnblad stated due to the Shoreland District requirements and the Comp Plan's encouraged densities, there is no way to create buffer. Page 8of13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Councilmember Odebrecht asked what the minimum number of houses required by the Comp Plan; and Mr. Turnblad answered the Comp Plan is calling for 4.4 homes. Councilmember Odebrecht asked if Mr. Turnblad has ever seen a messier development than this; and Mr. Turnblad stated infill projects are always difficult. This proposed project is infill on three sides which makes it even harder. Mr. Todd Ganz, applicant, pointed out that the plans have been revised to include greater distances between houses, but they are not being shown tonight. Houses 9,10, 11 have been spread out to allow more room for snow storage. The driveway for house 1 was moved south and there is a wider distance between the houses on Lots 3-6. Initially Heifort Hills Estate First Addition included the street to Neal Ave, however MNDOT would only allow 2 houses to use the driveway. Development Director Turnblad suggested we work to get access through Oak Glen trail. Mr. Ganz noted that he plans to use as many trees as possible around perimeter to buffer between development and Oak Glen Neighborhood. Along Highway 96 he would like to use a 6' fence and trees to buffer. Regarding the ponds that is behind Lots 9-11, catches the water and infiltrates, and if it floods, it overflows into the pond closer to the Heifort Hills. MnDOT did not allow for emergency access out onto Hwy 96, therefore the use of the `grass-crete' is necessary. He continued that Lots 2-6 will either be slab on grade or full basements, and Lots 9-11 are going to be walk -out full basements. Initially the thought was doing twin homes to get more in, but he insisted on single family detached to keep the value of the homes similar to the Oak Glen Neighborhood. The Homeowners association will be the same as the Heifort Hills 1st addition. Councilmember Odebrecht stated he was not sure how they could increase the space between the homes on Lots 3-6; and Mr. Ganz showed the new layout with approximately 15' between units. Councilmember Odebrecht encouraged the developer do neighborhood meetings to reduce concern and comments, and reminded Mr. Ganz to wear a mask going door to door. Chairman Dybvig opened the public hearing. Beth Harrison, Oak Glen Trail (directly across the street) requested denial of the Preliminary Plan, the private street, Hwy 96 setback easement. She listed 9 codes they are requesting to set aside and read comments submitted to the Planning Commission on 2/24/2021. Mrs. and Mr. Dianna and Steve Middleton, Newgate Avenue North, stated they support everything Beth Harrison has said. They asked the Commission to deny the development. They own the property between this development and the highway that will affect the drivability of Oak Glen Trail. They asked where the construction fencing would go, the berm they mentioned, the holding ponds. They have property located the west of that strip, so this development would affect their development potential in the future. Mrs. and Mr. Caitlin and Dario Mejia, Oak Glen Trail stated they concur with Beth and are asking the commission to deny this request. They stated they have concerns for the safety of their small family. They questioned if the Comp Plan took into account the fact that this Page 9 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 property would cut off access and perhaps the Comp Plan needs to be revised. They suggested that the City create a clear plan for development in the future. Mr. Gary Gerds, stated he was disappointed that Community Development Director recommended approval. He was led to believe this was 'an open question' and the decision on this development had not already been made. Mr. Gerds asked Director Turnblad is he knew of any other street in within Stillwater that was cut through a residential development to meet the needs of a developer; and Mr. Turnblad stated no. Mr. Gerds added that this sets an unbelievable precedent. If allowed, why not allowed anywhere else in Stillwater? He noted that the developer cut down trees between the homes and ponds on the 1st Addition. He questions what will happen to the existing home and its setback. He was told the project met engineering requirements, but does not see how. Mrs. and Mr. Amy and Dan Stoffer, Swenson Street, asked Mr. Ganz if the houses were constructed already; and Mr. Ganz answered there are only eight homes left to be constructed in Heifort Hills First addition, but not for this project. He expressed he moved here for the open space, and it appears cut and clear trees and put up as many houses as possible. He appreciates the fencing and tree buffer, but would prefer no development. Combining a new high density development to an older single family neighborhood is not right. He questioned why we would you allow houses closer than the highway then allowed. He indicated that the developer Mr. Stoffer stated that the Developer came to the meeting unprepared and not preparing the City and its Commissioners properly is not right. He hopes for denial, protecting the citizens of Oak Glen. Mr. and Mrs. Paul and Rose Giordano, expressed that they live right next door to the proposed road and fears it is going to devalue the home and cause accidents. They questioned, if they did not widen the street to 32', where are people going to park. Furthermore, there is no walkway to this development, so people will walk through their yards. He is concerned about the children within the neighborhood with a blind left -turn onto this road. He questions if civil engineering requirements and plan are being met. Easements to private road He stated that naming the road Oak Glen Lane makes it appear as an addition to Oak Glen. If so, then requirements and zoning of the Oak Glen Neighborhood should be followed. Mr. Peter Mayer, Oak Glen, stated that none of neighbors want this road. They settled in this neighborhood which has an established feel. When they bought their property there was no open land across the street it was surrounded by homes. Had they known this was a possibility they would not have purchased their property. This neighborhood has no sidewalks, and therefore all the residents use the streets. Connecting this road to a busy street would add traffic and problems. The only ones benefitting are those who do not live here. He quoted from Stillwater City Code, Chapter 2, Subd 6. Mr. Mayer asked that they do not practice 'development at all cost' and request 'say no' to this proposal. Mr. Tom Ash, Swenson Street, stated that Beth and Pete did a great job representing problems. Tom stated the removal of snow at 26' does not seem possible and cannot be done right. He wondered if the turnaround at the end of the street will occur in someone's driveway, and the Fire Department will have difficulty getting equipment in there. He questions delivery trucks and their use of the turnaround. He stated there are a lot of children in the neighborhood riding bikes, it is hard to see them so low to the ground. Great Page 10 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 care is needed in this neighborhood and this would greatly affect their safety. They recommend against the project and believe it would change the standards of the community. Mr. Bryce Urban, 2241 Oak Glen Trail, lives kiddie -corner and down the street. He stated that nine additional homes pouring out of essentially one driveway will create an additional 112 occurrences. This poses a lot of safety concerns for neighborhoods. When developed, this neighborhood was created with small streets and no sidewalks. If approved this would be setting a precedent and safety concern. Mrs. Caitlin Mejia stated Gary and June Jorgensen had been trying to purchase property along this roadway for years. The home at 2384 Oak Glen was a rental property and was not maintained. They have concerns about grass and snow plowing maintenance if this were to go through. Mrs. Diana Middleton wanted to add that the current owner does not maintain the property. Some possessions were stored on their property. Trees were removed and some were left on their property. She asked if the commission even have the plans updated and showed in the meeting. Chairman Dybvig summarized the process that they were just considering the Preliminary Plat with more details to follow if approved. Mr. Tom Ash asked about the next steps and the process going forward; and Ms. Wittman clarified the process and the next steps regarding this application. Chairman Dybvig closed the public hearing. Councilmember Odebrecht stated that he did have the correct plans and he simply misinterpreted what Ganz had said. He also stated the packet is publicly available. Commissioner Kocon stated there are a lot of moving parts and a lot of neighborhood concerns and questions. He stated the variance for setbacks is dramatic and the house would need to be moved or torn down. He stated that the City does have a Comp Plan that has been in place for a while a that plan includes this property. Mr. Kocon suggested that the developer have a plan for the home at 2384, whether that be tear it down or move it. He stated he could not embrace this plan at this point. Commissioner Hansen agreed with Commissioner Kocon and stated many of the questions the public have are good questions and many of theirs answers can be found in the City Code. He stated the PUD requirements are different then City Code. He stated he can cannot move forward with the plan as it currently sits. He questions why the Comp Plan would allow Low to Medium Density Zoning within the South Twin Lake Shoreland overlay district. Commissioner Steinwall stated she also has concerns regarding this proposal. Her concerns include the 100' setback Variance, which she will not support. She questioned how tabling would affect the 60-day rule; and Mr. Turnblad stated the Preliminary Plat has a 120-day rule, while the Rezone and Variance have a 60-day rule. He also stated that the City can extend that review period and additional 60 days if the Commission would like to table and review this application again. Councilmember Odebrecht thanked the neighborhood for their feedback. He stated the test is whether this will change the essential character of the neighborhood. He stated that the 60-day rule is a piece that we have to follow as, if we do not, it is automatically approved. Page 11 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 He stated the Comprehensive plan is the overall plan that should guide the City. However, this portion sticks out like a sore thumb in the Comp Plan. He understands there is increased pressure on Hwy 96 and this would create a significant burden on the Oak Glen Neighborhood, especially 2444 Oak Glen. He feels this is unpreceded in Stillwater. Motion by Councilmember Odebrecht, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall to deny the Case No. 2021-03, Preliminary Plat, Concept PUD, Rezoning and Setback Variance to the property located at 13187 Dellwood Rd. Councilmember Odebrecht clarified he feels tabling will not change the fact that this development will change the essential character of the neighborhood. He feels all boundaries have been pushed to get this development in there. Commissioner Kocon asked to discuss the rezoning portion. He questioned whether the rezoning from AP to RA should be done at this time and asked for an amendment to the motion to include the approval of the rezoning. Councilmember Odebrecht agreed to amend the motion to include the recommendation of approval for the rezoning; and Commissioner Steinwall seconded that amendment. Commissioner Hansen suggested that if they rezoned it at this time it may be inconsistent with future development and he believes it's better to leave it off the table. Councilmember Odebrecht agreed the original motion should include no change to the underlying Zoning; and Commissioner Steinwall agreed and seconded. Mr. Turnblad commented that you should never rezone a property until you are approving a plat. Chairman Dybvig summarized the motion to read: Motion by Councilmember Odebrecht, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall, to deny the Variance request and recommend denial to the City Council of the Preliminary Plat, Concept PUD and Rezoning for the property located at 13187 Dellwood Rd and 2384 Oak Glen Trail, Case No. 2021-03. All in favor. Motion passed 5-0. Case No. 2021-05: Consideration of a Variance to the exterior side yard setback to install a deck on the property located at 1002 4th Ave S in the RB district. Brian Smith, applicant and Margaret M. Georgi, property owner. City Planner Wittman explained Mrs. Georgi owns the property at 1002 4th Avenue South, and is looking to construct a 14' X 8' deck off the second story on the front of her house. The house is on a long but narrow corner property, and is setback far from the road, overlooking the St. Croix River. While the proposed deck is outside of the required front yard setbacks, the existing house and the proposed deck are within the exterior side yard setback; therefore, this deck will be an expansion of this existing legal nonconformity. The applicant is requesting a 10' variance to City Code Section 31-308. (b). (1). to allow a deck to be setback 10' from the exterior side yard lot line, whereas the required setback is 20 feet. Chairman Dybvig opened the public hearing. No public comments. Page 12 of 13 Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Chairman Dybvig closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kocon stated there are practical difficulties. The way the home sits on the lot forces a Variance and the neighborhood would support the Variance. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Hansen to approve Case No. 2021-05, a 10' variance to City Code Section 31-308. (b). (1). to allow a deck to be setback 10' from the exterior side yard lot line. All in favor. Motion passed 5-0. DISCUSSION There were no discussion items. FYI STAFF UPDATES Ms. Wittman gave an update on Jon Whitcomb's appeal Variance to the City Council. Ms. Wittman reminded the Commission about considering a second meeting due to case load volume. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Hansen, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to adjourn the meeting at 10:50 p.m. All in favor. ATTEST: Abbi Wittman, City Planner John Dybvig, Chair Page 13 of 13 Planning Report MEMO DATE: February 17, 2021 MEETING DATE: February 24, 2021 LANDOWNER: Jon and Ann Whitcomb Robert G. and Mary K. Lohmer Trust DEVELOPER: Jon Whitcomb of Browns Creek West LLC REQUEST: Adopting written statement of reasons for denial LOCATION: 12950 75th Street North REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner CASE NO.: 2021-01 INTRODUCTION At the Commission's last regularly -scheduled meeting the Commission considered a request for a 20' variance to the 100' 75' Street North right-of-way setback for one lot to be located in the future White Pine Ridge residential subdivision. In a 4-3 vote, the Commission denied the variance on the basis the applicant had not established practical difficulty and that the request was purely economic. Pursuant to State law, the Commission must adopt a written statement of reasons for the denial. SPECIFIC REOUEST Adopt written statement of reasons for denial of the 75t' Street North right-of-way setback variance requested as part of the future White Pine Ridge development. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends adoption of the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 2021-02. cc Jon and Ann Whitcomb Bob and Mary Lohmer RESOLUTION NO. CPC 2021-02 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ADOPTING WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DENIAL PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, § 15.99, SUBD. 2, FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK VARIANCE APPLICATION TO FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12950 75TH STREET NORTH CPC CASE NO. 2021-01 WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a request from the Applicant Jon and Ann Whitcomb a 20' variance to the 100' right-of-way setback from 75th Street right-of- way to allow for the future construction of a home at 12950 75th Street North (PID 3003020140012), legally described as follows: The south 1373.77 feet of the East Half of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 30, Range 20, Washington County, Minnesota; excepting therefrom the north 58.61 feet of the west 268.95 feet of the south 1373.77 feet thereof; also excepting therefrom the west 80.00 feet of the south 720.00 feet thereof; also excepting therefrom the east 245.00 feet thereof; and also excepting therefrom all that part which lies southerly of "line 3" as described as follows: "Line 3" is 75.00 feet northerly of and parallel with the following described centerline: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 01°04'48" West, assumed bearing, along the north -south quarter line of said Section 30 a distance of 38.03 feet to the beginning of said centerline; thence North 81°50'36" East, a distance of 1,395.68 feet; thence Easterly a distance of 1,279.97 feet along a tangential curve concave to the South, having a radius of 5,729.58 feet and a central angle of 12°47'59" and a chord bearing of North 88°14'36" East to a point on the East line of said Section 30, said point being 262.54 feet Northerly of the east quarter corner of said Section 30, and said centerline terminating at said point WHEREAS, City Code Section 31-302 allows for the construction of new structures to be setback 100' from the right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the Applicant had a future structure to be located 80' from the right- of-way; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the request based on the related documents shown in the Applicants' Application at their regular meeting on January 27, 2021; and WHEREAS, at the January 27, 2021, Planning Commission meeting, a motion was made by Commissioner Dyvbig and seconded by Commissioner Steinwall to deny the right-of-way setback variance request. The Commission voted 4 in favor, with Commissioners Hansen, Kocon, and Councilmember Odebrecht e opposing, and the motion passed; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes, § 15.99, Subd. 2(c), provides that "[i]f a multimember governing body denies a request, it must state the reasons for denial on the record and provide the applicant in writing a statement of the reasons for the denial. If the written statement is not adopted at the same time as the denial, it must be adopted at the next meeting following the denial of the request but before the expiration of the time allowed for making a decision under this section. The written statement must be consistent with the reasons stated in the record at the time of the denial. The written statement must be provided to the applicant upon adoption." NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater hereby adopts the following written statement of the reasons for denial stated on the record at the January 27, 2021, regular Planning Commission meeting by Commissioners voting to deny the 20' right-of-way setback variance: 1. The requested Variance was not consistent with all the standards for granting a Variance as described in Section 31-208. More specifically, the Planning Commission members voting against the requested Variance stated on the record at the January 27, 2021, regular Planning Commission meeting that the request was not justified for the following reasons: a. The owner had not provided evidence practical difficulty had been established; and b. The reason for the request was solely economic. Adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater this 24th day of February, 2021. Chris Lauer, Chair Attest: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner ilwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINSOA PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE NO.: 2021-06 REPORT DATE: March 16, 2021 MEETING DATE: March 24, 2021 APPLICANT: Traci Post LANDOWNER: Traci Post REQUEST: Variance to the front yard setback, in order to construct a front stoop. LOCATION: 1221 l st St S ZONING: RB, Two -Family Residential REPORT BY: Graham Tait, City Zoning Administrator INTRODUCTION Mrs. Post owns the property at 1221 1st Street South, and is looking tear out the existing front stoop and to construct a new 8' X 4' stoop on the front of her house. The wooden stoop will be roughly two feet in height with no railings, and connects to the house's front door. This house was built in 1880 and is positioned towards the front of this lot. The new stoop is being proposed to be located within the required front yard setback. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting an eight foot variance to City Code Section 31-308. (b). (1). to allow a front stoop to be setback 12 feet from the front yard lot line, whereas the required setback is 20 feet. ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. The property is zoned RB, Two -Family Residential; a single-family house with a front stoop, is permitted in this zoning district. CPC Case 2021-05 Page 2 of 4 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. a. What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? The purpose of the front yard setback is for uniform neighborhood development pattern and to allow for onsite drainage. b. If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? The existing stoop is legal nonconforming and already sits within the front yard setback. Rebuilding this stoop will expand this nonconformity and it will encroach slightly further into the setback. That being said, the property owner is still proposing to retain an open, unencumbered area in the front of the home, even though the setback is not consistent with the zoning code. Also, the lot is long and narrow, and like the other properties on this block, the house is situated in the front portion of the lot, right at the required setback. Adding a slightly larger stoop to this property will still maintain a uniform neighborhood development pattern, due to the proximity of the existing houses to their front yard lot line (this can be seen in the image on page 3). Lastly, the proposed stoop is not overly large and will not adversely impact drainage in any way. c. If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? No, it would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". a. Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? A property with single-family home with a front stoop is reasonable in the RB zoning district. b. Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? During the original construction, in 1880, the house was built in the front portion of the lot. Had the house been situated further back on the lot (to which there is room to do so), this would not be an issue. c. Are the circumstances created by the landowner? As stated above, this issue was created when the house was originally built so close to the front property line. The landowner isn't asking for a grand front porch, but rather a modest sized stoop. These circumstances were in no way created by the landowner. d. If granted, would the variance alter the essential character of the locality? CPC Case 2021-05 Page 3 of 4 If granted, this variance would not have negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. The addition of a font stoop will not negatively impact the neighborhood character because the development pattern of this block has the front of houses at or within the required front setbacks of properties. As you can see in the image below, the neighborhood development pattern is fairly close to the streets in this block. e. Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire is for the variance does not reflect economic considerations. The applicant is simply seeking to construct a front stoop that is a bit larger than the existing stoop. 4. This variance is not in conflict with any engineering, fire or building requirements or codes. There are no conflicts with any other City department's requirements or codes. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Planning Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested variance with the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with CPC Case No. 2021- 06, except as modified by the conditions herein. 2. Building permit plans will need to be approved by applicable engineering, fire and building officials before the issuance of a building permit. 3. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. CPC Case 2021-05 Page 4 of 4 B. Deny the requested variance. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial without prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the proposed stoop meets the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance. Practical difficulties have been established, such as the house being constructed so close to the front yard lot line. Furthermore, staff puts forth that this variance would not negatively impact the visual character of the neighborhood as a whole. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the variances for CPC Case No. 2021-06 with all of the conditions identified in Alternative A. Attachments: Site Location Map Applicant Narrative Site Plan cc: Traci Post MI MOO' :111111inetkw II SEASONS Nolir Construction I Concrete I Landscaping 216 Myrtle St W #292 Stillwater, MN 55082 651-342-0813 MN Lic Number 8C754569 WI Lic Number DC082000839 To whom it may concern, II Seasons is requesting a variance as a representative of, property owners, Traci Post at the property of 1221 1st St South. The property owners propose to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the landowner. Traci would like to tear out existing steps and front walk and build 8' x 4' stoop, with two 3' wide steps, and pour a new concrete front sidewalk & 2 steps toward the street. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. We appreciate your consideration. Please let us know if there is any additional information you would like or need to assist in the processing of this variance. Best Regards, Jennifer Belisle ilwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINSOA PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE NO.: 2021-08 REPORT DATE: March 16, 2021 MEETING DATE: March 24, 2021 APPLICANT: Jennine Lundquist LANDOWNER: Jennine Lundquist REQUEST: Variance to the impervious surface coverage, in order to construct a semi - in -ground pool. LOCATION: 1910 Oak Glen Trail ZONING: RA, One -Family Residential REPORT BY: Graham Tait, City Zoning Administrator REVIEWED BY: Abbi Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION Mrs. Lundquist owns the property at 1910 Oak Glen Trail, and is looking to install a 21' round semi -in -ground pool in the rear yard. This property is located within the Shorleand Management District, where the maximum allowed impervious surface coverage is 25%. Currently, with all structures and manmade improvements, the property is right at the 25% threshold, therefor any further improvements would require a variance. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variance to City Code Section 31-305. (b). (1). to allow the impervious coverage to be 27.7% (or 3,531sf), whereas the maximum impervious surface coverage is 25%. ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. CPC Case 2021-08 Page 2 of 4 The property is zoned RA, One -Family Residential; a single-family house with a pool in the rear yard, is permitted in this zoning district. 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. a. What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? One of the specific purposes of the maximum impervious surface coverage is to maintain open, unencumbered space to provide for adequate storm water infiltration. Furthermore, the purpose of the Shoreland Management Overlay District is "the protection of lakes, streams and water courses within its boundaries is critical for the health, safety, order and general welfare of its citizens and to preserve and enhance the quality of surface water and preserve the economic and natural environmental values of shoreland". b. If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? This property is on the very fringe of the Shoreland Management District and is located approximately 800 feet as the crow flies from South Twin Lake (displayed in the map below). When looking just two properties to the east, one will notice it is no longer in the Shoreland Management District, and the total allowable coverage is now 30%, as opposed to 25%. If approved, the total coverage will still be capped at 27.7%, which will be in harmony with the intentions of the zoning code. Furthermore, while the pool is considered impervious surface, it is retaining storm water and not redirecting it other parts of the property. The retention of this storm water, should not adversely impact drainage or create any storm water management issues. �� j j � Il 24 F% to water I. j®.«R ar�� 9Q { 8 t � 'Yi ` FOND f:EFi6/✓"/`" 2403 �.74. � The e:moi.�wti,'�....m j/ Y 1� 24PIt / N'yy��;/ JYJL YJ 2318 d,4,�( 4 Ii_ / If7f A .F"P}I { 2. VVV 231fi • "� ' 2314 ' .^� p 8753 2312 ,-„ Shoreland Management District 9 Fes" , 6]51 ' 2316 .tera r (_H € f=• `• r - - 1910 Oak Glen Trail 2640.4 .r j�•e" 'I. 1114 % - - i_L li1Si 8740 nos! 2307 -2e20 8745 , /, 600 12560 2500 ,8' 60 r24 a('9'400YY IV2303 , E t t 4 6741 2301 N WI-il"TF PINE WAY - 2625 2605 4i•r2rl .4 2565 2535 2505 <465 2435 2405 -P ,. I I St. Croix River Overlay District ...4.4 ,�" ' - '. Creek and Tribute district 1860 0♦"' ( .y� r7 ✓ . 7". - i Lake Shoreland Management District 1855 1845 . 183] 1i� jl - `1881 t ,b5i .. N' ' ,,i IV 1850 .r 183q 1. H'. i4 r ! , 0 85 130 reel 12850,E 1t N4B" 1846 `:I 1840 1836 II j • 1830 1820 1 1818 • 1 c. If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? CPC Case 2021-08 Page 3 of 4 No, it would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. Adding a pool and increasing the impervious surface coverage by 2.7% will not adversely impact the environmental goals presented in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". a. Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? A property with single-family home with a pool in the rear yard is reasonable in the RA zoning district. b. Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? This property is on the edge of the Shoreland Management District; in fact, the southeast comer of the property is outside of this district. If this house were located just slightly more east the maximum impervious coverage would be 30%, and a variance would not be needed. c. Are the circumstances created by the landowner? The circumstances were not created by the owner. The owner has not excessively built out the property, but rather the property is limited by being located in the Shoreland Management District. d. If granted, would the variances alter the essential character of the locality? If granted, this variance would not have negatives impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. The pool will be located in the rear yard and will not have any visual impacts. e. Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire is for the variance does not reflect economic considerations. The applicant is simply seeking to install a pool on their property, for personal enjoyment. 4. This variance is not in conflict with any engineering, fire or building requirements or codes. The Browns Creek Watershed District reached out to the City to find out how and when the pool was being emptied, to ensure there would be no adverse impacts to the stormwater ponds at The Ponds at Heifort Hills. The applicant has answered this question by explaining that it is a 10,000 gallon pool that does "not use backflush filters. Only cartridge so [there is] no draining of the pool on a given year. When liner is replaced (15 years later) we neutralize chemicals and drain to the street with a hose. No draining to neighbor's property or your own." CPC Case 2021-08 Page 4 of 4 This variance was not in conflict with any other City Department's requirements or codes. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Planning Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested variance with the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with CPC Case No. 2021- 08, except as modified by the conditions herein. 2. Building permit plans will need to be approved by applicable engineering, fire and building officials before the issuance of a building permit. 3. The swimming pool must be provided with safeguards to prevent children under the age of five from gaining uncontrolled access, in accordance with Section 33-2. Sub. 14. 4. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. B. Deny the requested variance. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial without prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the proposed pool meets the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance. Practical difficulties have been established, such as the property having stricter coverage requirements, because it is located on the very edge of the Shoreland Management District. Furthermore, staff puts forth that this variance would not negatively impact the visual character of the neighborhood as a whole. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the variances for CPC Case No. 2021-08 with all of the conditions identified in Alternative A. Attachments: Site Location Map Applicant Narrative Site Plan cc: Jenine Lundquist February 3, 2021 RE: Variance Request for a pool located at 1910 Oak Glen Trail This letter and the attachments are asking for your consideration and approval for adding a pool to the above -mentioned property. 1) I understand that the property only allows a limited amount of permeable surface space and that this request will exceed this. However, it will not be by an extreme amount nor will it impact any degradation of the land. 2) I have worked with Performance Pools & Spas to create a plan that is naturally conducive to the area and neighborhood. It will be a small 21' round semi-inground pool which will increase the value of the property and the housing area as well. In addition, will not alter the neighborhood environment whatsoever. 3) The pool will collect rainfall and therefore will not add to storm water runoff which is environmentally friendly. Also, please note in the supporting documents. There was a pool previously on this property and there are three homes as shown in the satellite photo that also have pools. I am asking this request to be approved to create an environmentally sound and family friendly space for myself and my daughter. I understand that each variance request is different and reviewed independently. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Best regards, ft (Vill, .JennineLundquist iliwater THE B{ R T H P L A I; E OF MINNF PLANNING REPORT TO: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: LAND OWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: ZONING: PREPARED BY: Planning Commission March 16, 2021 March 24, 2021 Tim Siegfried of Siegfried Construction 102 2nd LLC CASE NO.: 2021-09 A Special Use Permit for Outdoor Dinging on an existing patio and patio additions 102 2nd Street North CBD: Central Business District. Abbi Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION In October, 2020 the Lowell Inn received approval from the Heritage Preservation Commission for the partial demolition of single -story improvements location on the south facade of the building. Representatives for the Lowell Inn are now requesting a Special Use Permit to have outdoor dining on their patio and proposed two -tiered patio extension at 102 2nd Street North. The patio extension will include and at -grade area that will accommodate four additional tables; raised patio will be accessed from an internal meeting room and be used in conjunction with rental of that space. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of a Special Use Permit amendment for outdoor dining on a two -tiered patio. ANALYSIS City Code Section 31-207, Special Use Permits, identifies the city may grant a Special Use Permit or amendments when the following findings are made: The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this [Zoning] chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed or use and/or Case no. 2021-09 PC 3/24/2021 Page 2 structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Conformance to the Zoning Code generally surrounds around whether or not the proposed use will be compatible with its surrounding uses. The Lowell Inn's existing patio has been able to operate without issue; adding additional at -grade tables and outdoor space associated with the meeting room does not raise issues with planning staff. In staff's review of the request, the following items were reviewed: Exterior Improvements: On March 17, 2021 the Heritage Preservation Commission conditionally approved the design of the two -tiered patio system. Parking: On March 18, 2021 the Downtown Parking Commission reviewed the Lowell Inn's request. The Commission was reminded that, in 2008, the Lowell Inn gave the City property to construct portions of the municipal parking ramp. As part of the development agreement, the Lowell Inn's guest use agreed to pay the City 1% of its gross sales for their customer use of the parking ramp. On average, the Lowell Inn has paid the City $15,708 a year over the past 10 years. This deposit is well in excess of the standard mitigation required for the business's current and future parking needs. Comprehensive Plan Chapter 6, Downtown Stillwater Plan, identifies the following goal: "Encourage a viable and compatible mix of community and visitor -serving activities that builds on the assets of Downtown as a desirable placed to live, work, shop, recreate and visit consistent with the capacity of public services and facilities and the natural resources. Promote a diverse range of uses, a welcoming and engaging atmosphere, and unique activities and events oriented to a range of ages and cultures". Additionally, Chapter 7, Economic Development, identifies the following goal: "Support business expansion in the downtown commercial district..." The Lowell Inn and its patio will help the city achieve these goals. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Planning Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested use permit and associated variances with the following conditions: 1. This Special Use Permit is in all ways a Conditional Use Permit as the term is used in Minnesota Statue Section 462.3595. 2. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with CPC Case No. 2021- 09, except as modified by the conditions herein. 3. Abutting sidewalks must be kept clean of cigarette butts and other debris. 4. No exterior amplification, pipe music, or entertainment is permitted. If these uses are desired, an amendment to this Special Use Permit shall be obtained prior to the activity commencing. 5. Plans and the use will need to be approved by the applicable engineering, fire and building officials before the issuance of a building permit and/or Certificate of Occupancy. Case no. 2021-09 PC 3/24/2021 Page 3 6. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. B. Deny the requested use permit and associated variances. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION As noted in the Analysis section, above, the use conforms to the standards set forth for the issuance of use permits. Therefore, staff would recommend conditional approval of CPC Case No. 2021-09 with those conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Site Location Map Site Photos (2 pages) Site Plan cc: Tim Siegfried Lowell Inn 222 V 4=1114-.." rugt.. .111111110171:41" IIIE Illli nll i f IN ,fit" �, .►:=-� :- •• 1,41111._ 111' lrr i_ EXISTING PATIO ri- ir MN tiara �a�rwr^rir illffaliffrIgi Mr MT& jar 1 limn PATIO AREA (1) FUTURE RAISED PATIO AREA li I I I Illld4111111 'Lliiloll ![l 1111111111111 l[! I.1!! 11 rIR5T CONCF;RT WITH BALCONY AJ A ANb IRON FFNCE5 RxistInq tinq Room D 00 OD a RxMMt•lnq Medial poom D II x25 ('OBsf) 000 00 J D 0 D New Outdoor f3.4con:.Rat.po Space 404 sf F;xistlnq Ramp I7n. 11 0 J l;xpanslon of I%xlstlnq Front Poch 302 sf additional 0 Props Q 7L—= () ■ fl MW1U 51. ilwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINSOA PLANNING REPORT TO: REPORT DATE: MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: LANDOWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: ZONING: REPORT BY: Planning Commission March 16, 2021 March 24, 2021 Richard & Colleen Muske Richard & Colleen Muske CASE NO.: 2021-011 Variance to the exterior yard setback, in order to construct a new detached garage. 1312 Broadway St. N RA, One -Family Residential Graham Tait, City Zoning Administrator INTRODUCTION Mr. and Mrs. Muske own the property at 1312 Broadway Street North, and are looking to construct a 1,000sf garage in their exterior side yard. This property is extremely unique in its layout; it is comprised of two separate lots that meet perpendicularly and both front different streets, though neither of them is a corner lot (see image on right). SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting a 20' variance to City Code Section 31-305. (b). (1). to allow a detached to be setback 10' from the exterior side yard lot line', whereas the required setback is 30 feet. SAINT CROIX AVE E • lj 324 "`Property outlined in Red" 1 The RA District puts forth that "corner" lots have a 30' setback. While, this property is not a corner lot, this section of the property is an exterior side yard lot line and must follow the setbacks of a corner lot. CPC Case 2021-11 Page 2 of 4 ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. The property is zoned RA, One -Family Residential; a single-family house with a 1,000sf2 garage, is permitted in this zoning district. 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. a. What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? The purpose of the exterior side yard setback is for uniform neighborhood development, to create and maintain "front" yards, and to encourage storm water infiltration around the home. b. If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? This property is comprised of two separate lots that meet to form an "L" shape. This unique arrangement makes it so the garage must be located within this lot and situated closer to St Croix Avenue East (the exterior side lot line) than the house. Also the garage must be located south of an existing below -grade garage that is being filled in. So this location on the lot, where an existing above -grade garage is located, is the only feasible location for the garage. The applicant would like to expand the new garage to the maximum allowed 1,000sf, and since this lot is only 40' wide, expansion towards the front of the lot is the only option. Furthermore, the placement of this garage will not break the uniformity of this block, because the property to the east has a garage that hugs the lot line and the property to the west also contains an exterior side yard facing garage. Lastly, while the proposed garage is larger and closer to the street than the existing garage, there will not be an increase in overall surface coverage, because the new garage will be replacing existing gravel. So the proposed variance would not worsen the drainage conditions at this property; in fact, it gives the property owner a chance to address any existing drainage issues. c. If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? No, it would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the z This property had previously had two garages. However, the below -grade garage had a cracked foundation and was unstable. The City has allowed the property owner to completely fill in this garage, and it will no longer count towards total accessory structure square footage. CPC Case 2021-11 Page 3 of 4 property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". a. Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? A property with single-family home with a detached garage is reasonable in the RA zoning district. b. Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? The plight of the landowner is due to the unique lot configurations of this property. The odd shape of the lot, combined with the filled in below -grade garage, really limits the locations that a garage can be placed. c. Are the circumstances created by the landowner? The unique lot configurations, which lends itself to needing a variance in order to put in a larger garage, is not created by the landowner. However, the landowners are contributing to the extent of the variance, by proposing such a large garage. The owners are proposing a garage that is 41.5' deep; proposing a smaller garage would lessen the size of the variance needed. d. If granted, would the variances alter the essential character of the locality? If granted, this variance would not have negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. This property is right on the edge of the boundary between the RB and RA zoning district. In this neighborhood you have a matchless mix of houses that range from very close to the front lot line to meeting the setbacks. Many of the garages in this neighborhood are in front of the houses, and many garages encroach into the setbacks. With such a mix of housing, this proposed garage would not juxtapose the existing character of the locality. e. Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire is for the variance does not reflect economic considerations. The applicant is simply seeking to construct a new and larger detached garage. 4. This variance is not in conflict with any engineering, fire or building requirements or codes. There are no conflicts with any other City department's requirements or codes. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Planning Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested variance with the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with CPC Case No. 2021- 11, except as modified by the conditions herein. CPC Case 2021-11 Page 4 of 4 2. Building permit plans will need to be approved by applicable engineering, fire and building officials before the issuance of a building permit. 3. The two lots must be combined prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. B. Deny the requested variance. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial without prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the proposed garage meets the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance. Practical difficulties have been established, such as the configuration of this property and the existing below -garage garage proposed to be filled in, makes this location the only feasible spot to locate a detached garage. Furthermore, staff puts forth that this variance would not negatively impact the visual character of the neighborhood as a whole. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the variances for CPC Case No. 2021-11 with all of the conditions identified in Alternative A. Attachments: Site Location Map Applicant Narrative Existing Conditions Site Plan Site plans for Proposal (Two Pgs) cc: Richard & Colleen Muske 7111::1: �� ����� �' i . IIIEIllli nll �?" °'� -- :Ikii'i[JiTP. ® ,i T 1 February 24, 2021 Stillwater Planning Department 216 4th Street N. Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed find a Planning Application, proposed garage plan, elevations, survey and $225.00 fee for review by the Planning Commission. There currently is a two car garage on the property, however the garage slab is below street level and has cracked, tilted and failed and the garage trusses have pulled apart at the peak as the structure has sagged. The existing garage in our estimation, cannot be repaired. We are proposing to replace the existing garage and slab with a larger one story two car garage with storage to meet our needs. We will add fill to the lot to stabilize the building site and raise the building site to prevent what happened to the existing garage. The replacement garage would also be centered on the lot. The property also contains an underground cement walled bunker with a dirt floor and low ceiling that the City deems a garage. I have proposed to fill in the bunker to stabilize the structure and render it unusable. We are seeking a variance to more the garage closer to the street. I believe the new 11/ story garage to the west of the proposed garage received such a variance. The garage and house to the east are currently closer the street than my requested variance. The variance requested is consistent with the current garages of my neighbors. The proposed garage is located in the middle of the block and if the variance is granted the garage will not affect line of sight for oncoming traffic. Allowing the variance will also allow us to keep away from the underground bunker. Tha • c yo for your consideration. S Iti"r rd uske 131'. Iir. dway Street N Stillwater, MN 55082 /V/ 4072 ,p. 5W CO,e. 7- Z 287 e‘o 44/1944 I 77,FEW 4-'01 21, 22 .4 - - /17 9' "/9 'Z 7 if 4499 a / /..5-•.2 9. ZZ.. 74, Enererzz.9 2 STD/e ga. k-4. Pt4w 4 c. Laa./A4.5,[4. Z /A76- 7Y7-0 /,Y 4.e;74- /MP/ed 22, ZZ 22.Z g, AZ , .22 ..7.5C.7.Lit .2/.4 -1 Z2, I 22.0 2Z . 5 1 ZZ.0 •C) *- /-lt/A 72.3Z Z84, .,4"71A/4 67.2,4,1P. 4-4, ,...).... I /, 3 28, 9 / i4: Z9.9 1 1 , K v14 3i • 9 371/ 40 73 33 -7 29. Row. zz .0 ecve. Roo,c• VvNt 4-2M/C", ai4k \ JI 1423 ZZ. 0 ; ,e, /v, /19, - 2 17- e. e7. 7 ' P GO,e. /Va 47P492, Af047 //,- ..5";& le 7- -I. R/7/eci-z 7-/9//v-5 _4/ z -7- ) ALL / 7. 5 / 7: • 8 ./".a 1, 79 / - a20 7 /1 A/ /1 9, 79 - zhir 2Z 0 I .‘ 25. 3 ' / 2. 0 (4q4misr "/-,/e7) zC.9 24,9 5-0 E /2,vf 0E4. 26 29. 0\ 29. 3/. 3 3/. Z A / 7e- C,TL" .Z;1/29. eX/ a wc .227 //v 7 z //tz4--5- 2.6 . 9 la 7 3 Z-3(C. Ca4/2, 1 I s/.15Vz. tZ4 3Z .9 ix- 34, C e tiV, 44%) 347 7 3D.9 5-48 Fez/ 3a. / Coivc Cc -Age /17; e. /5,9 /4-440., fr/V, Afaiv, //z5" , /6" Cew , 23 0 4/4e,rie-,/ SURVEY MADE DESCRIPTION: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY BARRETT M. STACK STILLWATER, MINN. 55082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR (651) 439-5630 EXCLUSIVELYFOR: Mark Balay, Architec 10 Myrtle Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 Per Doc -NO. 4230199, MaSh.:CO:'Re0Ords: The South 1/2 of Lot 2 and the West 40 feet of Lot 3, Block 23, .CARLI AND SCHULENBURG'S ADDITION to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. Notes: o Indicates 1/2" I. D. Iron pipe set marked. STACK LS 13774. • Indicates iron found in place as noted. "M." Indicates field measured value. "R." Indicates plat record value. Orientation of this bearing system is an assumed datum. "B.Z.M." Indicates BENCHMARK: Magnail in conc. joint in concrete pavement. Project Elevation = 22.13. Add. 800.00 to. Benchmark and other spot elevation shown to convert same to NAVD 88 Datum. Underground or overhead, public or private utilities, on or adjacent the parcels, were not located in conjunction with this survey, unless noted otherwise. Roof and Eave Elevations noted are averages of same due to irregular vertical align. Offsets shown to existing structures are measured to the outside building wall lines, unless noted otherwise. Any projections from said wall lines such as eaves, sills, steps, etc., will impact indicated offsets accordingly. The westerly walls of the existing concrete garage -are irregular in horizontal and vertical alignment. Offsets shown are measured to the generall wall alignment and can vary. Overall Parcel area is computed to the described parcel boundary. Existing improvements location is as directed by Mark Balay. No other existing improvements were to be located other than as shown. 2 Story Frame House No. 1312 location shown is approximate. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 9-28-2020 Reg.No 13774 8'-01I 76 mOrVY LINO 40 FT, 1119 gdn9 MAN ♦ °!r- - z 0 77 O O -7 G 77 77 24 -OI l' } \ r 1 ASnON QNV OU-Vd 01 Sd AJS QNN DAQ MAN 011Vd 510,1O9A,g1 V d\O UO UOOd Alld9NO9 JNIISIXA '1A 96'66 ANI'I /lI-dAdOdd ( 110S W-IM QAT1H 11 01) TTVM NINId1Ad t flO J MAN (CIAAOWAd Al 01) A'ddN115IX1 4d119 0119M115161 ,10-, 9Z 8' -V PULPING HFIGHT 19'-01I 1 JkVMQWOW N Z 11 19NAQISAd JNII5IX1 8'-01I 76 mOrVY LINO 40 FT, 1119 gdn9 MAN ♦ °!r- - z 0 77 O O -7 G 77 77 24 -OI l' } \ r 1 ASnON QNV OU-Vd 01 Sd AJS QNN DAQ MAN 011Vd 510,1O9A,g1 V d\O UO UOOd Alld9NO9 JNIISIXA '1A 96'66 ANI'I /lI-dAdOdd ( 110S W-IM QAT1H 11 01) TTVM NINId1Ad t flO J MAN (CIAAOWAd Al 01) A'ddN115IX1 4d119 0119M115161 ,10-, 9Z 8' -V PULPING HFIGHT 19'-01I 1 JkVMQWOW N Z 11 19NAQISAd JNII5IX1 iliwater THE B f FIT H P L A C E OF MINNESOIA Planning Report MEMO DATE: March 17, 2021 CASE NO.: 2021-12 MEETING DATE: March 24, 2021 LANDOWNER: Buettner Real Estate LLC APPLICANT: Cory Buettner REQUEST: Consideration of a Special Use Permit for outside storage LOCATION: 127/131 Main Street South COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD, Central Business District Flood Fringe Overlay REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION The owners of Leo's Grill and Malt Shop (127 Main Street South) have obtained approval from the City to remodel their patio. The approved design includes a trash enclosure to be located on the northern side of the patio. While a portion of the patio enclosure's roof will include customer dining, another portion has been proposed to remain vacant. The property owner is seeking approval to place a walk-in freezer on top of the trash enclosure. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting consideration of a Special Use Permit for outside storage of a walk-in freezer ANALYSIS City Code Section 31-207, Special Use Permits, identifies the city may grant a Special Use Permit or amendments when the following findings are made: The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this [Zoning] chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed or use and/or CPC 2021-12 PC 03/24/2021 Page 2 of 3 structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Conformance to the Zoning Code generally surrounds around whether or not the proposed use will be compatible with its surrounding uses. Generally speaking, second -story storage is not typically contemplated in the downtown core. This situation is a little unique in that the improvement might not have been able to be accommodated as part of the trash enclosure addition given the site is located in the floodplain. However, business expansion onto the patio should be done with care and caution as to not set precedent. Simply put, we want to promote business expansion but in a way that does not spill out of traditional building footprints nor have a negative impact on the surrounding area. City Code Section 31-325 indicates outside storage is a Specially Permitting Use in the Central Business District; a footnote of the Allowable uses in non-residential districts indicates "[a]11 outside storage shall be screened by a solid wall or fence and landscaping for public view". The applicant is not proposing to screen the improvement. On March 17, 2021 the Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the proposed improvement. The Commission conditionally approved a Design Permit for the walk-in freezer. A condition of their approval is that the freezer must be screened on the south side, on top of the stairwell, to a height of the freezer. While the trash enclosure's eastern parapet is not the height of the freezer, staff asserts it will still be visible from Water Street and users of the Water Street Inn. Given the intentional reflectivity of the improvement, solid wall screening on the east side should be contemplated by the Planning Commission. With regard to noise, the elevation of the cooler will project sound coming from the condensing unit, compressor and evaporator fan. The adjacent property's second story has three windows along their western (shared) property line. As the freezer will be located within close proximity to second story windows on the building to the north, this could be of a concern to the adjacent neighbors. While this is a commercial area and the neighboring 2nd story use is also commercial, the noise could impact their enjoyment of the property. Lastly, in discussions with Washington County Department of Public Heath, there is concern that the improvement may not be able to be placed in this location. To the date of memo development, POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Planning Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested flood fringe Conditional Use Permit and setback variance with the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially compliant with those on file with the Community Development Department's case file 2021-55 except as modified herein. 2. Solid wall/panel screening shall be required on all street -facing sides. CPC 2021-12 PC 03/24/2021 Page 3 of 3 3. Plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the applicable Engineering, Fire and Building Inspections departments prior to project commencement. 4. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. B. Deny the request. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial without prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMEDATION The proposed improvement generally conforms to the intention of the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code. However, public interest conditions, including the requirement for opaque screening on all street -facing sides, should be considered. That said, in lieu of having approvals from the Public Health Department, staff would recommend the Commission table consideration until such time as approvals have been granted. Attachments: Site Location Map Narrative Site Plan(s) Elevations Specifications Cc: Cory Buettner Jen Noden, Seven Edges Design �AI� �i ■� !aft �''- i ��114 i0:r , i. �..�. �1A1a.\ .jC ��. P•:7111.:1.1111 l���I,►` �` �� I� i:�"..e�yI1%hj it It?I► ®- T 1 \ Buettner Real Estate, LLC 437 Broadway St S Stillwater, MN 55082 City of Stillwater Planning Commission 216 4th St N Stillwater, MN 55082 February 25, 2021 RE: Letter to Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage To Whom It May Concern, Leo's Grill and Malt shop would like to take advantage of the unused space on the roof of the new trash enclosure in order to expand the limited freezer storage for the restaurant. We would like to install a single 8' wide x 6' deep x 6'-7" high walk in cooler, similar to installations of mechanical on rooftops, that would be accessible to employees only. This cooler would be placed so as not to block the views of the neighbor's windows to the north. Due to the heights of the east trash enclosure parapet wall and the stair walls/railings, the cooler will be at a level where there would be minimal view, if any, from pedestrians on the street. Please see 3D's for visual sightlines. Thank you for your consideration of this matter, Cory Buettner Buettner Real Estate, LLC STRUCTURAL COLUMN REVERSE TO RH DOOR SWING 2X6 FRAMING ON ALL WALLS W/ P.T.LUMBER McNICHOLS® FIBERGLASS GRATING Pultruded, Wide T-Ber, MS-WT-1810 - DURAGRID 2X6 FRAMING WITH — P.T. LUMBER BATHROOM SLAB ELEVATION 691.05 02B S C FLOOR MOP SINK WITH FAUCET RUCTURAL LUMN DENOTES ROOF LINE STRUCTURAL COLUMN ij n1 TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 FT-1-1-1-T71-ri' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .I — COVERED PATIO SEATING • 4 T • P POWER POLE FOR GLORIA'S TO GO 'm a STRUCTURAL COLUMN GRADE LEVEL IRRIGATED PLANTER BED WITH FUTURE TRELLIS AND LANDSCAPE LIGHTING IRRIGATED PLANTER WALL BY OTHERS LOW PLANTER BED FLUSH WITH PATIO TO ACCEPT STORMWATER RUNOFF TRELLIS N.I.C. ELM OPEN PATIO SEATING DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES >= 2" STRUCTURAL COLUMN NON-STRUCTURAL COLUMN METAL RAILING NIC REMOVABLE ` LANDSCAPE GRATE HOSTESS ` FLAG POLE WITH LANDSCAPE QUEUE TO ACCEPT STORM STATION GRATE TO ACCEPT STORM WATER DIVIDER NIC WATER RUNOFF: NIC RUNOFF: COORDINATE LOCATION COORDINATE WITH PLUMBER WITH PLUMBER SEVEN EDGES COMMERCIAL. HOSPITALITY INTERIOR DESIGN 501 MAIN STREET NORTH #216 STILLWATER, MN 55082 JENNI FER@7EDGESDESIGN. COM 6 1 2 . 7 5 9. 1 9 3 6 PROJECT: L E 0' S GRILL 1 2 7 MAIN STREET S STILLWATER, MN D A T E 3-5-2021 SHEET TRASH ENCLOSURE/PATIO PLAN SCALE g"=1'-0" OUT OF SCOPE FOR ROOF DRAINAGE DETAIL SEE 2/A-102 30' 13 -9" 21 SP UP I I IGOT FOR ER DECK LEANING IS GLORIA'S ON THE GO BELOW 17' 3" OPEN PATIO SEATING 30' 32" 6' 1 1 12 -3" 10'-4" METAL RAILING BY OTHERS rA SEVEN EDGES COM M ER CIAL• HOSPITALITY INTERIOR DESIGN 501 MAIN STREET NORTH #216 STILLWATER, MN 55082 JENNIFER@7EDGESDESIGN.COM 6 1 2 . 7 5 9. 1 9 3 6 PROJECT: L E 0' S GRILL 1 2 7 MAIN STREET S STILLWATER, MN D A T E 3-5-2021 S HEE T TRASH ENCLOSURE/PATIO PLAN SCALE g"=1'-0" i ill l IN II 11. •MIS LEO'S WALK IN FREEZER SPECS. Walk -In Freezer: 8'-0" X 6'-0" X 6'-7" - 4" extruded polystyrene, stucco embossed galvalume 26 gauge exterior, stucco embossed galvalume 26 gauge interior, nsf approved. Floor: 8'-0" X 6'-0" - 4" extruded insulation, 22 gauge stainless steel interior, stucco embossed galvalume 26 gauge exterior U.S. Cooler floors are not designed for the use of Forklifts, Pallet Jacks, or Hard Wheeled Carts. Damage caused by this usage will void the panel warranty Door, 34 in. X 64 in.; low temp inside, with floor, threshold, Vert -Ergo handle, LED light, LED thermometer switch, door closure and adjustable spring -loaded hinges, hinge left centered on left width wall , with U.S. Cooler Logo 1 Pressure relief (usc 9644) installed Refrigeration 1 x Condensing Unit • Manufacturer: Tecumseh • Description: Pre -assembled Remote Low Temp R404A Air Cooled Outdoor Condensing Unit • Model: ASHR2460ZNAMSI • Compressor: 1-1/2 hp, Hermetic • Extras: Liquid line Filter Drier, Sight Glass - Included • Electrical: 208-230/1 Phase/60Hz RLA: 9.4 MOPD: 0 MCA: 0 • Conditions: BTUH: 4310 Room Temp: -10°F Cond Ambient: 95°F • Sizing Room: 4348 BTUH Needed for 8'-0" X 6'-0" X 6'-7" • Sizing Product: 316Lbs of Misc Product Entering at 20°F • Warranty: Parts: 1-year Standard Manufacturer (Optional extended parts warranties available) Labor: Not Included (Optional labor warranties available) 1 x Evaporator (Unit Cooler) • Manufacturer: Russell • Description: Pre -assembled Electric Defrost Low Profile Coil • Model: RL6E042DDAA • Extras: Expansion Valve (ERSE-1/2-ZP), Solenoid Valve (E3S120) - Mounted • Electrical: 208-230/1 Phase/60Hz Fan Amps: 0.5 Defrost Amps: 4.9 • Warranty: Parts: 1-year Standard Manufacturer Labor: Not Included (Optional labor warranties available) Total weight of box, roof, and refrigeration 1090 lbs. LEO'S WALK IN FREEZER SPECS. Walk -In Freezer: 8'-0" X 6'-0" X 6'-7" - 4" extruded polystyrene, stucco embossed galvalume 26 gauge exterior, stucco embossed galvalume 26 gauge interior, nsf approved. • i w ► a * i ma IIvJ '- w' f `• � i ' � t a% .:N �` ., ft , .m. op,.• - ../ �/ / + 61' a• a a + R la ■ `'NM y y 4.w 5� N...1 .• ... ti p' .• - — r 4...1 `\ • .tea — • r. ' tip~ . w R \ • t IL `5 •• • h1 • 4. 1j w f ° ?; •x I1,f"5 t ' 1 F:1 r-� r .. ., - f f r r r * pl. 4 - - • .. 40 .' r� f /e ..ter; K w . �, ' J `., * .. a • - * r % 4104 414 AD . 5 a .- • Floor: 8'-0" X 6'-0" - 4" extruded insulation, 22 gauge stainless steel interior, stucco embossed galvalume 26 gauge exterior U.S. Cooler floors are not designed for the use of Forklifts, Pallet Jacks, or Hard Wheeled Carts. Damage caused by this usage will void the panel warranty Door, 34 in. X 64 in.; low temp inside, with floor, threshold, Vert -Ergo handle, LED light, LED thermometer switch, door closure and adjustable spring -loaded hinges, hinge left centered on left width wall , with U.S. Cooler Logo W9 W10 W11 1'-51„ 0 3'- 1 '-52" 1C1 34" HPR F1 C2 F2 C3 F3 6' To aid in packing, please indicate with an X the corner where installation will be starting. 9M 17M £M 8' QUOTE DRAWING Sign below for acceptance X By signing here, you agree to our terms and conditions as outlined on www.uscooler. Panel configuration subject to U.S. Cooler final approval. A facsimile or emailed approval of this drawing 526193-0 shall have the same force and effect as a signed original and shall, upon receipt by U.S. Cooler, be binding on both Parties. Materials: Legend ExtMetal:Galvalume Ceiling — — — — — Floor — — IntMetal:Galvalume Foam:Extruded 4in. Freezer: 8'-0" x 6'-0" x 6'-7" Scale: 1/2"= 1' U.S. COOLER 401 DELAWARE ST. * QUINCY, IL 62301 TEL 217-228-2421 " 800-521-2665 * FAX 217-228-2424 CUSTOMER Eichten Sales Company Refrigeration Specifications Qtyl Manufacturer I Model I HP I Electrical I MCA I CmpRLAI CmpLRA I Dimensions DxWxH Pre assembled Remote Low Temp R404A Air Cooled Outdoor Condensing Unit JOB# P.O.# DATE 02/08/2021 DRAWN C.G.S. 3.0 Tecumseh Russell ASHR2460ZNAMS111.5 RL6E042DDAA 208-230/1 Phase/60Hz 208-230/1 Phase/60Hz 5.4 9.4 156 26.6"x28.4"x18.5" 15.5"x27.125"x 18.125" DWG. REF 526193-0 APV. liwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINNESOTA Planning Commission REPORT DATE: HEARING DATES: DEVELOPER: REQUEST: March 18, 2021 CASE NO.: 2021-13 Planning Commission March 24, 2021 Jeff and Missy Hause representing JAM Freedom, LLC 1) Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements 2) Zoning Map Amendment (ZAM) from AP, Agricultural Preservation, to RB, Two Family 3) Preliminary Plat approval for Marylane Gateway Addition, a six -lot, single-family residential subdivision LOCATION: 8483 Marylane Avenue North COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LMDR, Low/Medium Density Residential ZONING: AP, Agricultural Preservation REVIEWED BY: Reabar Abdullah, Assistant City Engineer; Tom Ballis, Deputy Fire Chief; Taylor Stockert, Natural Resources Technician; Karen Kill, Administrator, Brown's Creek Watershed District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND Jeff and Missy Hause, JAM Freedom LLC, plan to develop a 2.57-acre parcel at 8384 Marylane Avenue North. The preliminary plat for the project, to be known as Marylane Gateway Addition, shows six (6) single family lots, one of which will contain the existing residence. In addition to consideration of the preliminary plat, the applicant is requesting the City's consideration to rezone the property from AP — Agricultural Preservation to RB — Two Family Residential and vacation of the existing property's drainage and utility easements. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant has requested the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of: 1. A Vacation for existing drainage and utility easements; 2. A Zoning Map Amendment for 8384 Marylane Avenue North to be changed from AP — Agricultural Preservation to RB — Two Family Residential; and 3. A Preliminary Plat for Marylane Gateway Addition. CPC 2021-13 March 24, 2021 Page 2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. REZONING JAM Freedoms, LLC proposes to have the property rezoned from AP, Agricultural Preservation, to RB, Two -Family Residential. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map guides the property is for Low/Medium Density Residential development. The RB district corresponds to the guided LMDR density. Therefore, RB is an appropriate zoning district for this situation. It is customary for the City to condition the rezoning upon final plat approval. II. PRELIMINARY PLAT The 2.57-acre parcel is proposed to be subdivided into six single family lots. One home currently exists at the northern edge of the property; this structure would remain onsite on a newly -platted lot. A. Minimum Dimensional Standards: RB District Massing Standards RB Standard Min. requirement Proposed Lot area: single-family 7,500 sf 17,267 sf min. Lot area: two-family 10,000 sf 17,267 sf min. Lot width: single-family' 50' 64.22' min. Lot wide: two-family' 75' 64.22' min. Lot depth2 100' 238.16' min. Lot frontage on public road 25' 64' min. Front setback: house 20' 30' min. Front setback: garage 30' 30' min. Side setback 5/15'3 7.5' min Rear yard setback 25' 140' min. Maximum lot coverage 50% (25% bldg.; 25% other) TBD The proposed development plan conforms to the RB District's dimensional standards which are incorrectly noted on the enclosed plans. When building permits are issued, each new residence will be reviewed against the setback and lot coverage requirements. Proposed residences that do not conform to the standards will not be allowed. B. Civil Engineering City Engineering staff have reviewed the development. Generally speaking, the proposed development, including the drainage and utility easement vacation, is in conformance to the City's Engineering design standards. However, there are two areas of concern: 1. A storm sewer pipe is proposed to be located between Lot 5 and Lot 6. Drainage and utility easements for Lot 5's southern lot line and Lot 6's northern lot line will each need to be 1 Width is measured between side lot lines at right angles to lot depth at a point midway between front and rear lot lines 2 Average distance between front and rear lot lines. 3 Total of both side setbacks must be a minimum of 15 feet, with a minimum of 5 feet on each side. CPC 2021-13 March 24, 2021 Page 3 increased to 10' for a total of 20' between the two. Additionally, a 10' drainage and utility easement will be required for the southern lot line for Lot 6. 2. The stormwater treatment pond outlet will cause some issues to the properties to the east of the proposed development. In 2018 the City of Stillwater, in coordination with the Browns Creek Watershed (BCWD), constructed the "Marylane Drainage Improvements," to alleviate stormwater problem getting close to the properties on the east of the proposed Marylane Gateway development. The project included creating a swale filled with river rocks to carry the water south between the proposed development and these properties to the drainage area. Adding an outlet will block this drainage swale and cause the water to move east toward the backyard of the properties to the east. The City will not allow this and other options will have to be investigated; City staff is open to meet and discuss other options. Therefore, a condition of approval is recommended to ensure the stormwater design is updated prior to final plat submittal. Additionally, City engineering staff has advised the following conditions of approval should be considered: • All of the preliminary civil engineering plans shall be found satisfactory to the City Engineer, or revised to his satisfaction, prior to release of the final plat from City offices for filing with Washington County. • All electrical and communication utility lines are required to be buried. • The vacation of the existing drainage and utility easements shall not become effective until after final plat approval. The easement vacation documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The easement vacation shall be recorded with Washington County prior to the recording of the final plat. • The existing home will be required to pay water and sewer hook-up charges. The fees will be payable prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. At the time of memo development, those fees are: o Water Hookup: $4,588.37/unit o Sanitary Sewer Hookup: $4,588.37/unit • The developer will be responsible for paying development impact fees based upon the net developable acreage of the project, which is 1.98 acres (2.57 gross minus 0.59 for the existing home's proposed lot coverage). The fees will be payable prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. At the time of memo development, the following development impact fees are required: o 2021 Trout Stream Mitigation ("AUAR") fee: $3,787.07/acre - Total of $7,498.40 o 2021 Trunk sewer and water fees: $11,671/acre - Total of $23,108.58 C. Tree Preservation & Landscaping Two applicable development standards exist for trees on this project: 1) tree preservation and 2) street trees. 1. Tree preservation: The City's conservation regulations indicate private development may not reduce the existing tree cover by an area greater than 35% and the canopy cover by no more than 50%. While the development is proposing to remove trees to accommodate the CPC 2021-13 March 24, 2021 Page 4 building sites and stormwater facilities, no greater than 35% of the significant trees nor 50% of the canopy cover will be removed. 2. Street trees: The subdivision code requires an average of three trees per lot along the street, though they are to be planted outside of the platted right-of-way4. A total of five trees, one for each new home created, are proposed for the development but, fifteen trees are required. So, an updated landscape plan showing the 10 tree deficit will be required prior to the release of the final plat. The landscaping plan should be developed in consultation with the City's Natural Resources Technician to ensure species diversity is achieved. The subdivision code allows a tree replacement fee to be paid if they cannot be planted on site. The fee would be based upon the retail cost of a 2" DBH deciduous tree. If this is the desirable approach for the developer, this will be outlined in the Development Agreement to be considered by the City Council at the time of final plat. Applicable conditions of approval include: • The size of the replacement trees must be an average of 2 inches diameter at about four feet above ground. Conifers must be at least 6 feet tall. D. Environmental Considerations 1. Floodplain — The property includes no FEMA identified floodplains. 2. Shoreland Overlay District — The property does not lie within a shoreland overlay district. 3. Wetlands — The property has no wetlands. 4. BCWD — A Brown's Creek Watershed District permit will be required for the development. While the applicant has submitted for BCWD review, BCWD has determined their application incomplete. A condition of the City's preliminary plat approval is that a BCWD permit shall be obtained prior to the submittal of a final plat. E. Park & Trail Dedication When future developments are contemplated, review for conformance to the adopted Sidewalk and Trail plan, Park and Open Space plan, and the subdivision ordinance, which requires sidewalks on all through streets, must be considered. The developer is not proposing any park, trails or sidewalks to be associated with Marylane Gateway Addition. Upon review of the City's Trails and Sidewalks plan, no trails or sidewalks are being proposed in this area. A trail does run along the western side of Marylane Avenue North, connecting the Rutherford Station neighborhood to the Browns Creek State Trail. Additionally, when the property to the south — Marylane Meadows — was platted, the City required connection from Manning Avenue to Settler's Glenn 2nd Addition. The Parks and Open Space plan does not envision any public parks on or near the proposed subdivision. That said, however, the far northwestern corner of this property is located outside the mile park service area. With only a small land area outside of the service area and this 4 City Code Ch. 32, Subd. 6(3)q CPC 2021-13 March 24, 2021 Page 5 area being — essentially — the front yard to the existing residence, staff has determined it is not appropriate to require land dedication for this development. On March 22, 2021 the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) will be reviewing the plat and providing recommendation regarding Park and Trail land dedication. Staff is recommending that, in lieu of land dedication, $2,000 park and $500 trail fee should be considered for each new lot created. A condition of approval, memorializing staff's recommendation is included; staff will provide the Planning Commission with a verbal update of the PRC's March 22 discussion. ACTION REQUESTED The developer requests the Planning Commission to review and recommend approval of the preliminary plat. ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission has several available alternatives: 1. Recommend approval — If the Planning Commission finds that the information submitted is sufficient and that the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compliant with City code, and is not detrimental to the neighborhood, then the Planning Commission could recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary plat. 2. Recommend denial — If the Planning Commission does not find that the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compliant with City code, and is detrimental to the neighborhood, the Planning Commission could recommend that the City Council deny it. 3. Table for more information. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the following plans on file with the Community Development Department, except as may be modified by the conditions herein: • Preliminary plat Sheet C-001 Dated 2/25/2021 • Demolition plan Sheet C-010 Dated 2/26/2021 • Site, grading, erosion & sediment control plan Sheet C-201 Dated 2/26/2021 2. The rezoning shall not become effective until after the approval of the final plat. 3. The stormwater management plan must be revised and found satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to the submittal of the final plat application. 4. All civil engineering plans shall be found satisfactory to the City Engineer, or revised to his satisfaction, prior to release of the final plat from City offices for filing with Washington County. CPC 2021-13 March 24, 2021 Page 6 5. Drainage and utility easements for Lot 5's southern lot line and Lot 6's northern lot line will each need to be increased to 10' for a total of 20' between the two. Additionally, a 10' drainage and utility easement will be required for the southern lot line for Lot 6. 6. The drainage and utility easement vacation approval shall not be effective until the final plat is approved. Such vacation request shall be submitted with the final plat for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to release of the final plat from City offices for recording with Washington County. 7. The developer shall obtain a Browns Creek Watershed District prior to ground disturbance. Any permit conditions that the City Engineer finds necessary to include in the final plan set shall be included in the final plat application package. 8. An updated landscape plan showing the 10 tree deficit, will be required to be submitted prior to the release of the final plat. The landscaping plan should be developed in consultation with the City's Natural Resources Technician to ensure species diversity is achieved. The size of the trees must be an average of 2 inches diameter at about four feet above ground. Conifers must be at least 6 feet tall. If paying a fee in -lieu of tree installation is the desirable approach for the developer, this will be outlined in the Development Agreement to be considered by the City Council at the time of final plat. 9. Materials may not be stored in the critical root zone of trees to be saved, nor may equipment or materials be leaned or stacked against trunks of trees identified to be saved. 10. All electrical and communications utility lines shall be buried. This shall be specified in the plans submitted for final plat approval. 11. The existing home will be required to pay the $4,588.37/unit water and $4,588.37/unit sanitary sewer hook-up charges. The fees will be payable prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. At the time of memo development, those fees are: 12. The developer will be responsible for paying development impact fees based upon the net developable acreage of the project, which, for 2021, is $7,498.40 for Trout Stream Mitigation ("AUAR") and $23,108.58 for Trunk sewer and water. If the fees are not paid in 2021, the fees will be adjusted annually. The fees will be payable prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. 13. In lieu of park and trail land dedication, the developer shall be required to pay a $2,000 park and a $500 trail dedication fee for each new home lot created. The fees will be payable prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. 14. If the Developer desires to have a neighborhood entrance monument for the subdivision, plans for it must be included within the final plat application materials. Otherwise, such a sign will not be permitted in the future. 15. A Development Agreement found satisfactory to the City Attorney and City Engineer must be approved by the City Council prior to commencing any tree removal or grading on the site, and prior to holding a pre -construction meeting with the City Engineer for the project. Attachments: Site Location Map Development Plans cc Jeff and Missy Hause 1. ...., ..., 12191 3 1 3490 '' " - ,________, 3 '> ir 489 -f IIIwater "�.OF 2054 12 -, COUNTY g }�� # F `►':'� as'1 1221 M r t' 9 .---ROAD 64 - 4 3484 34 3487 j) Lt s� 3481 87TF� • 3483 3481 34 _MCKUsICK ROA] The Birthplace of Minnesota Site Location .„ _ __- __.il,,,, +4°h , -v _ - -ti "- __ d-N� ..=��a��'���.". � 8483 Marylane Ave N 1472 1478 1484 _Z49 k 1498i 1465 � 1479 1497 y 8483 P "a •4 1468 Iv 1474� 1 14 1462 COURT 1456 1465 11475- Ce '1450 it �� 1460 1465 0 125 250 50Feet 1445 1491 I_I.'. 1452 1445 0 1447 Z, ' m • General Site Location 1435 1435 _• 1 1444 0\�. _ �°444 -G 1429 ' J. IIP � I ■.► ■A1r —111 ae.. . 3690 1425 8399 1 I 3650 r ' 1436 '�� •14t3B, �11i�� NIE.6 � �, 1111 i nLt 11 , e�IIP ... �O / 1 � ►.__, ` ., 'V" .,I 0 363 K 14251428 142 f 1426 / ifiii� �Ij J vi ri ": �� \�• �: ®®® 3710 �, 365 3702 / ,'� $ 7 1420 �•�� 1��� �1190" ��.,II i� .ni. r�, .��`I ..4.1" �� `�•ih ,F T ®® C+�/ I ,; 1, I _ 362 .It. 3694 1 .. ,, ate;;, 8 .`0111 l �� rl1��- ®m�` memeam ®�i N, '1615 3686 ,,�,. "3611 36? \\- 4T: -* . �J ` tl7411��+A 1 ■e — 8337 /336 3678 m .1is alewhi •Q1.ii a�I ipli � tl 3632 3610 ;3604 • 3620 1330 :. p -: _ M- ^' . ` �� 11/�� �.. .. �,�11 '` i�! M.Mif �I 1 L..-- o = , y A. 3650 -8325 , 10 3 �" . -1. CO o MCKUSICK ROAD N. C.S.A.H VICINITY MAP X 1- I L 7 - _ I II II �T I I II I 2 L - I t 3 /"-Thr----N,• • 4 i 5 L O 1 6 o MARYLANE AVE. N. NOT TO SCALE LOCATION MAP DELLWOOD ROAD MCKUSICK ROAD N w w Z z w a w J >- SITE 80TH STREET N 75TH STREET N z w w a J w O PROJECT CONTACTS OWNER MARK AND MARLENE PAVLICK 613 155TH AVENUE SOMERSET, WI 54026 MARK PAVLICK T (651) 353-8113 DEVELOPER JAM FREEDOM LLC 613 155TH AVENUE SOMERSET, WI 54026 JEFF HAUSE T (651) 442-6555 CIVIL ENGINEER ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC. 901 N 3rd STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 STEVE JOHNSTON, PE T (612) 260-7982 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC. 901 N 3rd STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PILAR SARAITHONG, RLA T (612) 260-7982 LAND SURVEYOR CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6750 STILLWATER BLVD. N. SUITE 1 STILLWATER, MN 55082 DAN THURMES, LS T (651) 275-8969 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY PLANNER CITY OF STILLWATER 216 FOURTH ST N STILLWATER, MN 55082 ABBI JO WITTMAN T (651) 430-8822 PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER CITY OF STILLWATER 216 FOURTH ST N STILLWATER, MN 55082 SHAWN SANDERS, PE T (651) 430-8835 SHEET INDEX C-000 COVER SHEET C-001 PRELIMINARY PLAT BY CORNERSTONE SURVEYING C-002 EXISTING CONDITIONS BY CORNERSTONE SURVEYING C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-201 GRADING PLAN C-202 SWPPP C-203 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-301 UTILITY PLAN C-501 DETAILS C-502 DETAILS C-503 DETAILS L-010 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER - MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FEBRUARY 26, 2021 MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com P�� P� 0041 FO ON CO SHEET COVER SHEET 0-000 NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. CLS20020 TREE TAG # `n w_ U LLJ 0_ V) CONDITION w 1- 0 Z I A / A ee• / / / A //, -/- / A / 1/1/ /I /--///\//-, / / / / \ / / / // / / \ / / v r , A / F r / Y / I / l 1 / V r, / A -/- I- / / / I / I L _ / I / MCKUSIK ROAD N. C.S.A.H. NO. 64 A / \ / I5 EXISITNG LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TYP. DECIDUOUS TREE #3307 1 Spruce, white 2 Spruce, white 3 Spruce, white 4 Spruce, white 5 Spruce, white 6 Spruce, white 7 Maple, silver 8 Aspen, quacking 9 Boxelder 10 Ash, green 11 Elm, american 12 Elm, american 13 Elm, american 14 Elm, american 15 Apple 16 Apple 17 Cherry, black 18 Ash, green 19 Cottonwood, easterl 20 Walnut, black 21 Maple, silver 22 Ash, green 23 Maple, silver 24 Maple, silver 25 Basswood, american 26 Oak, red 27 Spruce, white 28 Elm, american 29 Maple, silver 30 Spruce, white 31 Cherry, black 32 Elm, american 33 Elm, american 34 Oak, bur 35 Oak, red 36 Cherry, black 37 Aspen, quacking 38 Aspen, quacking 39 Cherry, black 40 Cherry, black 41 Oak, red 42 Elm, american TYP. CONIFEROUS TREE #3307 TREE TAG 1 SEE TABULATION ON THIS SHEET 0 0or0 0 or ❑ TREES: /ery Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Good Fair Fair Fair Good Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Good Good Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Good Fair 9 Fair 18 Fair 30 Fair 10 Good 10 Fair 16 Fair 19 Fair 9 Good 16 Good 6 Fair 17 Good 14 Good 13 Fair 8 Good Fair 10 12 10 16 13 12 51 16 22 18 10 15 7 8 11 12 2x 23 2x 15 21 21 66 3x 22 22 22 33 3x 20 7 6 30 51 2x 26 25 28 2x 26 25 22 extra parcel extra parcel extra parcel extra parcel extra parcel extra parcel extra parcel 19 extra parcel 14 extra parcel DENOTES TREES AS IDENTIFIED AND LOCATED BY: Mark Rehder President & CEO Rehder Forestry Consulting www.rehderforestryconsulting .com 612-760-3519 City of Stillwater Tree Preservation Definitions - Significant Tree: a tree measuring at least 6 inches in diameter at 54 inches above ground (dbh). Cottonwood, silver maple, and box elder are protected at a size of 20 inches (dbh). Buckthorn and Siberian elm are not considered significant trees at any size. A 2x in the notes section denotes a tree with 2 stems, etc. 20 boxelder trees averaging about 12" in diameter that were not captured and make up the majority of the south lot, plus some siberian elm 0 ✓ IAC IEPI ET FOUND MONUMENT 1/2" IP MARKED RLS 1 5480 SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS NO. 25718 CABLE TV PEDESTAL AIR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LIGHT POLE GUY WIRE -0- POWER POLE O GAS MANHOLE O GAS METER • TELEPHONE MANHOLE ▪ TELEPHONE PEDESTAL co SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN O IMBI O x 950.0 WATER VALVE BOLLARD FLAG POLE MAIL BOX TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE SOIL BORING SPOT ELEVATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE FLARED END SECTION O STORM MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION HYDRANT CURB STOP WATER WELL WATER MANHOLE WATER METER POST INDICATOR VALVE 90. WM UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC u v UNDERGROUND CABLE TV OF UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ou OVERHEAD UTILITY UG UNDERGROUND GAS > SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER WATERMAIN x x FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] 1230 - CONTOURS /////////////// BUILDING LINE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE a4 / / / »» v61 V 9/4 ID 9/2 V 30"RCP X 919.6 911.0 - Z V 909.2 V 61 --- v 909. 909.4- V I A / / 1 / / 1 Y V / I 9090 S OX c-, ro 0 X '0 0 0 ` / / / A / / , / / / / V \ A / / \ / / / / V \, -/- / , A / / / / / \ / / \ / / V r 7 / \ / / / / / / \� I0" DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EA UE #27 UG UT UE Ic UG t � - 909.6 X908.2 X 9 06.5 J X905.9 r--905.7 905.2 5H RI v=909.3 X904.8 9095 9 �9 STMH 909.7 I 08, 1 6 "BURRIED RIM=906.6 PLAN X909.0 1� INV=901.6 N PLAN -`FLOOR =912.2 911.1 X 906 X906.4 16 132.1 #26 UG / / A / -/- \ / / / / / / / \ / / Y V / 0T r, / /, / / -1- r" / / -/ /- -1 \ r , r , / , I A / A / / .. /- < /- r / / 1 / 1 / L J / I \/ Y Y / V / #31-- 0,0- S8 917.8- ' 9 PER PEAT>7.7 UG #2q 915.8 X 9/ s ql4 4/a aU 90q\X 7%�Y. 4 X907.6 5SI3 g06.7- X905.8 7.5 ' D+U EASE 7.5 ' D+U EASE ° UE 4"E x FENCE r ; #3 INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT PER DESCRIPTION "AI' ------- /- - / / /- - \ / / r, r- r / / Fr /-- /-- /- \ / / I L - L - / \ 4 UG -59- #30 17.4 EM G 1 /////////X 917.5 EXISTING HOUSE / FLOOR \ =918.8 DECK L r WELL 917 OTW 915.38W = 915.8: W -916.9TW 9157SW �rG.9TW c� Q a C5 VFLOOR =911.1 j////4=911/////x 9OG.3 911.�2T V -909.IBW --911.2TW XPO •95 909.0BW Ivy 911.2TW -909.IBW FOUND 1/2 INCH' IRON PIPE MARKED 0.1' N. AND 0.2' E. OF PARCEL CORNER X 004.0 X907.0 X 905.3 TSB 0105.43 907.0 4X4 POST X 905.8 904.7 X DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT X906.7 >> 27"X44"RC 908.7X X908.2 XG109.8 .08.1 FLOOR L/ =908.9 EXISTING HOUSE 907.9 909.3 k r, 68.66 0� N89°14 12 w � Y / r/- X907.5 X I A / A \ / r, / A - I/1/ / I Y /-- / 1 / I / V V / I / / L_ I/ I / r, A I I / /- r /_I / / / 1 / 1 / L _ FENCE X uu BB- - HOOP y #32 X 905.8 X905.4 X907.5 9\ q06 X907.1 X905.6 / � X906.8 X905.5 p� 4-XP06.7 40 GCB RIM=906.0 NV=901.5 PLAN 16.1 o2 #33 #42- SHEr' #34- 907.0 -1 907.3 - X(1106.1 D+U EASE SB PRIMARY q �4.q0 E)<906.8 - 917.6 21 " FOUND 1/2 INCH IRO 'IPE KED RLS 0.5' N RCEL ER X FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED 0.I' AND 0.2' // PARCELS• / #40 - 907.8 J --#3q 1 D+U EASE #I9 D+U EASE /I X907.3 X906.5 X907.I / 1/1/ 0 0 0 X 0 X FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE 0.1' N. OF AND 0.1' PARCEL CO X , 0 0 6 BURRIED 06.3 X 906 51-1H -2 X905.0 N 906.01 + X 905.3 90 RIM=906.7 a/J INV=P01.1 W PLAN 0 �9 0 9/4 he following Legal Description is as shown on the St. Croix Title as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. P22405-2 1 -P2579, dated January 25th, 2021. Lot One (1), Block One (1), Rivards Addition, according to the recorded Plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State; also that portion of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1 /4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1 /4) of Section 19, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Southerly line of right-of-way of Stillwater and Saint Paul Railroad Company with the Westerly line of township road running Northerly and Southerly along the East side of the West One-half (W 1 /2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1 /4) of said Section 19 as said township road is now located; thence Southerly along the Westerly line of said township road One Hundred Twenty-five feet (1 25') to a point; thence Westerly and parallel with the Southerly line of right-of-way above mentioned One Hundred Twenty-five feet (1 25') to a point; thence Northerly and parallel to the westerly line of the said township road One Hundred Twenty-five feet (1 25') to a point on the Southerly line of the said right-of-way; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said right-of-way One Hundred Twenty-five feet (1 25') to the place of beginning. EASEMENT NOTES: The following survey related exceptions appear on the St. Croix Title as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. P22405-21 -P2579, dated January 25th, 2021. 7. Subject to the Slope Easement per Doc No. 728080. (DOES NOT EFFECT PARCEL) 8. Subject to the Highway/Drainage Easement per Doc. No. 728081. (DOES NOT EFFECT PARCEL) 9. Subject to the Washington County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 83 - Co. Rd. 64, per Doc. No. 71 41 83. (DOES NOT EFFECT PARCEL) 10. Subject to the terms and conditions of a Vacation, vacating the public drainage easement per Document No. 42221 91. (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) 1 1. Subject to the Resolution of Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Washington County Ordinance No. 89, per Doc. No. 670563. (NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY) EASEMENT "A" And also an easement for ingress and egress described as follows: A strip of land Thirty-three (33) feet in width lying Thirty-three (33) feet Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1 /4 of SW 1 /4) of Section Nineteen (1 9), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West which is the point of beginning of the easement line to be described; thence Southerly along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1 /4 of SW 1 /4) a distance of Thirteen and four -tenths (13.4) feet and there terminating. EASEMENT "B" And reserving an easement for ingress and egress described as follows: A strip of land Thirty-three (33) feet in width lying Thirty-three (33) feet, Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1 /4 of SW 1 /4) of Section Nineteen (19), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West; thence Southerly along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1 /4 of SW 1 /4) a distance of One Hundred Thirteen and four -tenths (1 1 3.4) feet to the point of beginning of the easement line to be described; thence continuing Southerly along said East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1 /4 of SW 1 /4) for One Hundred Twenty-five (1 25) feet and there terminating. AREA: TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 1 1 1,756 SQ.FT. / 2.57 ACRES SURVEY NOTES: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. NAD 83 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER ONE LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF STILLWAER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPROMISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER 210190165. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One CaII TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 SEPTIC/WELL EXISTING SEPTIC AREA TO THE WEST OF THE HOUSE NOT LOCATED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE SEPTIC SYSTEM WAS PROVIDED. WELL SHOWN EAST OF THE HOUSE. MARYLAN E GATEWAY ADDITION CONTACT: JAM FREEDOM, LLC C/O JEFF HAUSE 613 1 55TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-439-0189 COUNTY/CITY: WASH 1 NGTDN CO U I J S i 1 L LWAT E R NORTH 0 30 60 REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 1-23-21 INITIAL ISSUE CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that lam a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Registtation Number: 25718 Date: 1-23-21 PROJECT LOCATION: 8483 MARY LANE N. PID#1 903020320050 1 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME PROJECT NO. SURVJH36 JH1 9036 EXISTING CONDITIONS C-002 I, 1,/ / I /--/ / / \ / / -. / / / / \ / VA / ♦ / l / / / V \ / / l / l V / / // / / / \ / / r l / I A/ r\ / .1 -I- /-r / I/I/ /-- / , I / / 1/ V V l L_ / 1 / A / / \ / / / / V l i , EXISITNG LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT \„ / / / ---v61 -1 /6� 9/4 9/2 V v X 919.6 91I.0- -\ v 909.6- 30"RCP »_ » 9�6 909.2 - 6 v 909 909.4 - V v 0 X I A / A i / 1/ A//\ / I /--/ / / \ / / -, V V / I / / / / / V \ x909.0 9 9,5 909.7 0 I= 1� MCKUSIK ROAD N. C.S.A.H. NO. 64 -/ i \ A / / / / / \ / / \ / / V \ i\ 1 / A / -/ \ / \ / \ / \ / / V / / /„/ /-/- /- r / / -, /- -/ / / I / \ / / / / INGRESS AND EGRESS 91E3 EASEMENT PER DESCRIPTION I'A1" -_ __ i\ r- / / /- - \. / A / i \ /\/ / / / V \ / , - 918.7 10' DRAINAGE UE #27 UG 909.6 X908.2 X906.5 X905.9 -905.7 / r 7 / \ / / / / / / \ - 132.2 r, r, ., I A / A / I A / A 1 / I / I / / I Y V V / I / , 1 A / / / /_1 L _ / I I-< F r / / I/I/ / \ / L / / 1 \ / V V / V ♦ / 0,0 8 917.8 / / / / PER "AT UG 915.8 X r 4"E 9 UE 0 9? 1 ai 1 DECK \ r, r- r- / / / r /- - /- - i- - S'LY LINE OF FORME x FENCE r-#3 UG #30-�-uG u \ EM GM 917.5 EXISTING 0 % HOUSE FLO R =9I8.8 I GM .6T i 10 6W V/ O //q�l . • •� P••/(.5( Q OL / Q 9/ / I' / C5 ql I 9; 7 rIe0 . FLOOR Vs X911.81 .con • / =911.1 q\ I 238.16 9/j 917,3rw 9. 2 w-909.IBW 9J12T11L '31-9yet-911I.2TW.OBW I 909.IBW FENCE // g16g16.1 i U -,- r , A / / / /-r / I / / / L _ 25.00 DESC. WELL -917.OTW -915.8:Wg15.3BW W ar .9TW 00 BB - HOOP #32 16. I I- - 917.6 // o #42 FOUND 1/2 INCH 20 IRE if i r KED RLS R'� 0.5" N. Ng I RCEL (i��'• ER a/ -O.q iiiia fs 4l 1 SHE I #34Pi 1 \.." ." 4. #3 o2� I #33 MYX s_/L /// q08 FOUND 1/2 INCH'/ 2 / IRON PIPE X907.0 X907.6 MARKED 0.1" N. AND 0.2' E. OF X 905.8 PARCEL CORNER g'ss g06.7- X905.8 X 904.9 270.66 N89°14'12"W X 905.3 3 BLOCK 1 akSB g05.43 270.16 N89°14'12"W N89°14'12"W 269.66 905.2 ------ -- EASEMENT VACATED -221r7°13 DOC. N0. 42221g1 / _ _ - X904.8 0,0 '3 1 +90 L STMH 96 '- BURRED 7.5 ' D+U EASE 7.5 ' D+U EASE g08.7X X908.2 X909.8 g08.1 21M=906.6 PLAN INV=901.6 N PLAN FL00R =912.2 LFLOOR 908.9 A EXISTING HOUSE 269.16 89°14'12"W DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT ----�9a6.T /'1/ / 907.9--- 909.3 . �68.66 0 N89°14 +12 W 90 8' X9075 X 905.8 X907.5 X907.1 X905.6 X905.5 /'li/ 1- / L_ 906 L/ X906.1 D+U EASE S�RIMARY 04.g0 g �4.g0 FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED 0.1 AND 0.2" // PARCEL / #40 908.1- D+U EASE #I9 D+U EASE X907.3 X906 X907.1 X. 906.8 c, Xg06.7 10 CB rn` RIM=906.0 INV=901.5 PLAN I A / /;/ .. + X905.3 90 / 0 0 FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE 0.1" N. OF- AND 0.1 PARCEL CO 0 0 X 0 „ 06.3 X 906 / STMH X905.0 BURRIED R RIM=906.7 a`) NV=901.1 W PLAN 904.1 904.0 0 \9 0 9/6, 9/4 0 r� ACI EM ET 7 O 0 0 O or or MANNING AVE FOUND MONUMENT 1/2" IP MARKED RLS 15480 SET 1/2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS NO. 25718 CABLE TV PEDESTAL AIR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LIGHT POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE GAS MANHOLE GAS METER TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN O red X 950.0 O UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND WATER VALVE BOLLARD FLAG POLE MAIL BOX TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE SOIL BORING SPOT ELEVATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION HYDRANT CURB STOP WATER WELL WATER MANHOLE WATER METER POST INDICATOR VALVE ELECTRIC CABLE TV FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] 1230 CONTOURS /////////////// BUILDING LINE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE VICINITY MAP S.T.H. NO• 616 DELLW000 RD• CREEK (CO. RD. N0. 64) MCKUSIK RD. SITE BOUTWELL RD N NOT TO SCALE SEC. 19, TWP. 30, RNG. 20, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MN PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN AS THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED D+U EASE f DEVELOPEMENT DATA TOTAL PARCEL AREA = 1 1 1 ,756 SQ. FT. LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 LOT 6, BLOCK 1 = 25,635 SQ. FT. = 16,859 SQ. FT. = 1 7,364 SQ. FT. = 17,332 SQ. FT. = 1 7,299 SQ. FT. = 1 7,267 SQ. FT. EASEMENT VACATION BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT = 30' SIDE = 10' REAR = 25' MAX 30% LOT COVERAGE THE FOLLOWING REQUEST TO VACATE ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS COVERING THE EXISTING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, RIVARD ADDITION. NEW EASEMENTS WILL BE DEDICATED ON THE PROPOSED PLAT OF MARYLANE GATEWAY ADDITION. Those particular Drainage and Utility Easements over all of Lot 1, Block 1, as dedicated on the plat of RIVARD ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota. SEPTIC/WELL EXISTING SEPTIC AREA TO THE WEST OF THE HOUSE NOT LOCATED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE SEPTIC SYSTEM WAS PROVIDED. WELL SHOWN EAST OF THE HOUSE. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One CaII TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 The following Legal Description is as shown on the St. Croix Title as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. P22405-21-P2579, dated January 25th, 2021. Lot One (1), Block One (1), Rivards Addition, according to the recorded Plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State; also that portion of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 19, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Southerly line of right-of-way of Stillwater and Saint Paul Railroad Company with the Westerly line of township road running Northerly and Southerly along the East side of the West One-half (W 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of said Section 19 as said township road is now located; thence Southerly along the Westerly line of said township road One Hundred Twenty-five feet (1 25') to a point; thence Westerly and parallel with the Southerly line of right-of-way above mentioned One Hundred Twenty-five feet (125') to a point; thence Northerly and parallel to the westerly line of the said township road One Hundred Twenty-five feet (125') to a point on the Southerly line of the said right-of-way; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said right-of-way One Hundred Twenty-five feet (125') to the place of beginning. EASEMENT NOTES: The following survey related exceptions appear on the St. Croix Title as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. P22405-21-P2579, dated January 25th, 2021. 7. Subject to the Slope Easement per Doc No. 728080. 8. Subject to the Highway/Drainage Easement per Doc. No. 728081. 9. Subject to the Washington County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 83 - Co. Rd. 64, per Doc. No. 7141 83. 10. Subject to the terms and conditions of a Vacation, vacating the public drainage easement per Document No. 4222191. 1 1 . Subject to the Resolution of Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Washington County Ordinance No. 89, per Doc. No. 670563. EASEMENT "A" And also an easement for ingress and egress described as follows: A strip of land Thirty-three (33) feet in width lying Thirty-three (33) feet Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Nineteen (19), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West which is the point of beginning of the easement line to be described; thence Southerly along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) a distance of Thirteen and four -tenths (13.4) feet and there terminating. EASEMENT "B" And reserving an easement for ingress and egress described as follows: A strip of land Thirty-three (33) feet in width lying Thirty-three (33) feet, Westerly of the following described line, to -wit: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) of Section Nineteen (19), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West; thence Southerly along the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) a distance of One Hundred Thirteen and four -tenths (113.4) feet to the point of beginning of the easement line to be described; thence continuing Southerly along said East line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of SW 1/4) for One Hundred Twenty-five (125) feet and there terminating. AREA: TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 1 1 1 ,756 SQ.FT. / 2.57 ACRES SURVEY NOTES: 1 . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. NAD 83 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER ONE LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF STILLWAER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPROMISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER 210190165. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey MARYLAN E GATEWAY ADDITION CONTACT: JAM FREEDOM, LLC C/O JEFF HAUSE 613 1 55TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-439-0189 COUNTY/CITY: !!!f!, NORTH 30 60 DATE REVISION 2-12-21 INITIAL ISSUE 2-25-21 PRELIMINARY PLAT CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Regist ation Number: 25718 2-12-21 Date: PROJECT LOCATION: E3 PID#1 903020320050 1 CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 m DEMOLITON NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC., ON JANUARY 23, 2021 EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT. ELAN DESIGN LAB CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY ARE DISCOVERED SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERING UN -WITNESSED WORK SHALL RESULT IN REJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 3. PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPE NOT LABELED FOR DEMOLITION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY ON -SITE OR OFF -SITE AREAS DISTURBED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DUE TO CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CIVIL PENALTIES RESULTING FROM THEIR WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 4. NO DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ON -SITE. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE HAULED OFF -SITE TO A DISPOSAL AREA APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS. WORK SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A CONDITION THAT MINIMIZES EROSION POTENTIAL ON A NIGHTLY BASE. 5. LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF WORK NEEDS TO EXTEND TO PUBLIC STREETS OR RIGHT OF WAY IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO APPLY FOR ALL PERMITS, PREPARE ALL DRAWING AND PAY ALL FEES AND COST. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES. 6. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. SEE SHEET C-202 AND C-203 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND APPROPRIATE STAGING AND SEQUENCING. 7. PROVIDE NECESSARY BARRICADES, SUFFICIENT LIGHTS, SIGNS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL METHODS AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. 8. REMOVE ALL VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXCEPT AS NOTED. LEGEND / REMOVE BITUMINOUS TREES & VEGETATION CLEARING REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE TREE SEE L-010 FOR TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TREE PROTECTION FENCE C.S.A.H. NO.64 u w 0 z w w 0 z w w cP x x Iw 0 I N 5 I / / / / 7 i / /7 / / 7 / 7 / / i i , y , / / i / i i vv i vy 7 i i i r� i II � II L 4 a_ 0 CO CO 7 7 7 7 6 0 \- #30 7 Si 29 In 1 I \ INV= 91 1.5 -- I 15>'5M \ / 7 7 i 7 / / / / \ \- REMOVE OR RELOCATE SHED COORDINATE WITH OWNER / \ \ �\ \\ \ \ 32\\ \ #7 \ \ \ \ \ w \ \ \\ \ \ \ I 1 I \ I\ \ I \ \ \ \ 1 / i / #25 / / / 1 / I 1 I / t— fi——---7-- i — \ In 1,� in 7 In / 2' \ W \ REMOVE BITUMINOUS TO MAKE UTILITY CONNECTION 6„ #2 / / / / — // / / A / / _ / ' /— — —7,— /— /— / / / / / l L i ' 7 �, II / \ REMOVE CULVERT • REMOVE RETAINING WALL 2 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT #24\ ■I_■* ce PROTECT TREES TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) REMOVE TREES Iif Nsn L� REMOVE TREE PROTECT UNDERGROUND \TELEPHONE rt REMOVE BITUMIOUS \ J ♦ • \ / 7 �-9194 7 906 --------- PROTECT TREE B COO\ s �In #10 3�— n 3n 1 PROTECT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROTECT UTILITY SERVICES PROTECT UTILITY SERV-I-6ES- PROTECT TREES TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE PROTECT TREES & VEGETATION PROTECT GAS REMOVE TREE REMOVE STORM SEWiR FE=902.1 & FLARED END SECTION„ - PROTECT WATERMAIN MARYLANE AVE. N. REMOVE BITUMINOUS TO MAKE UTILITY CONNECTION N- PROTECT UTILITY SERVICES Lu Lu o co NMI* ir PROTECT STORM SEWER MANHOLE, AND FLARED END SECTION STM BURRED RIM=906.7 INV=901 .1 W PLAN CB INV=901 .5 PLAN EXISTING STMH BURRIED RIM=906.6 PLAN INV=901 .6 N PLAN 20 60 MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan s e ' Xon or report was prepared by me, fil i ct supervision, Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET DEMOLITION PLAN C-0 1 0 DEMOLITION PLAN Know what's below. Call before you dig. SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO. 951.0 FBWO f 95, 1 959.0 GRADING NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED. 3. FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT BY HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES DATED FEBRUARY 8, 2021. 4. ALL UNDOCUMENTED FILL, AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING PADS. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE PROJECT EXCAVATIONS TO VERIFY THAT UNSUITABLE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY REMOVED FROM PROPOSED STRUCTURAL AREAS, THAT ADEQUATE BEARING SUPPORT IS PROVIDED BY THE EXPOSED SOILS AND THAT STRUCTURAL FILL IS PLACED APPROPRIATELY. THE EXPOSED SOIL AT THE BASE OF FOOTINGS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98 PERCENT PROCTOR DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698). 5. ON -SITE NON -ORGANIC SOIL IS GENERALLY SUITABLE FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. SILTY OR ORGANIC SOILS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN R EN ENGINEER TOVERIFY THAT PROPERCOMPACTION S C0 G 0 HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED (DRIED OR WETTED) AS APPROPRIATE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. MOISTURE CONDITIONED ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 8 INCHES OR LESS. EACH LIFT OF FILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED BY LARGE VIBRATORY EQUIPMENT UNTIL THE IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING TABULATION. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION NON -ENGINEERED FILL (GREEN SPACE) ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOUNDATIONS ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FLOOR SLABS ENGINEERED FILL PLACED AS PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE ENGINEERED FILL PLACED BELOW PAVEMENT AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTION CRITERIA 90 98 98 95 100 MOISTURE CONTENT -5 TO +5%, -3 TO +3% FOR SOILS WITH <12% P200, -1 TO +3% FOR ALL OTHER SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SOILS WITH <12% P200, -1 TO +3% FOR ALL OTHER SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SOILS WITH <12% P200, -1 TO +3% FOR ALL OTHER SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SOILS WITH <12% P200, -1 TO +3% FOR ALL OTHER SOILS INFILTRATION BASIN TESTING CONTRACTOR MUST CONDUCT A POST CONSTRUCTION TEST ON ALL INFILTRATION BASINS IN CONFORMANCE WITH BROWNS CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RULES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER, CITY ENGINEER AND BROWNS CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE TEST TO FACILITATE OBSERVATION OF TEST RESULTS. 6. SIDEWALLS SHALL BE BENCHED OR SLOPED TO PROVIDE SAFE WORKING CONDITIONS AND STABILITY FOR ENGINEERED FILL PLACEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE STABILITY OF AND EXECUTING PROJECT EXCAVATIONS USING SAFE METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR NAMING THE "COMPETENT INDIVIDUAL" AS PER SUBPART P OF 29 CFR 1926.6 (FEDERAL REGISTER - OSHA). IF SOIL CORRECTION IS REQUIRED IT SHALL EXTEND 3 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE PAVEMENT OR BUILDING LIMITS PLUS ONE FOOT HORIZONTAL FOR EVERY VERTICAL FOOT OF CORRECTION. 7. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM BE INSTALLED AT THE BASE OF BASEMENT FOUNDATION WALLS AND UNDER WALKS AND PATIOS. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT SEPARATE FOUNDATION DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BE INSTALLED ON BOTH THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF THE FOUNDATION. THE DESIGN OF THESE SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE BUILDER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE SUBGRADE FROM INCLEMENT WEATHER TO MAINTAIN STABILITY. FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF TOPSOIL, PAVEMENT, AND ANY UNSUITABLE SOILS, THE RESULTING SUBGRADE SHOULD BE SCARIFIED AND RE -COMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. A PROOFROLL TEST SHOULD THEN BE PERFORMED TO DETERMINE SOFT OR UNSTABLE SUBGRADE AREAS. IF RUTTING OR LOCALIZED UNSTABLE SUBGRADE AREAS ARE OBSERVED, THOSE AREAS SHOULD BE SUBCUT, MOISTURE -CONDITIONED, AND RE -COMPACTED OR REMOVED TO A STABLE DEPTH. THE PROOF ROLL SHOULD BE PERFORMED WITH A TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK LOADED TO GROSS CAPACITY (AT LEAST 20 TONS). ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF THE PROOF ROLL SHALL BE LIMITED TO RUT FORMATION NO MORE THAN ONE INCH (1") DEPTH (FRONT OR REAR AXLES) AND NO PUMPING (ROLLING) OBSERVED DURING THE VISUAL INSPECTION. PROOF ROLL TESTS SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TO VERIFY THE SUBGRADE WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PAVEMENT SUPPORT. 9. PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2.0" BITUMINOUS WEAR (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA240B) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) 2.0" BIT NON -WEAR (MNDOT 2360 SPNWB230B) 6" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5 OR CL7) 24" SELECT GRANULAR SUB -BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 10. THE BROWNS CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT ENGINEER AND INSPECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. LEGEND BUILDING PAD REAR ELEV 1—TYPE OF BUILDING BASEMENT ELEV — FRONT ELEV CONCRETE PAVEMENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT MNDOT MIXTURE 25-141 GENERAL ROADSIDE BROADCAST SEEDING TEMPORARY - MIXTURE 21-111 OATS COVER CROP SEEDING RATE PLS 59 LBS/AC. FIBER BLANKET MnDOT CATEGORY 3N (ALL SEEDED SLOPE >4:1, DITCH BOTTOM, AND INFILTRATION BASINS) MNDOT MIXTURE 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH BROADCAST SEEDING TEMPORARY - MIXTURE 21-111 OATS COVER CROP SEEDING RATE PLS 35 LBS/AC. SOD SILT FENCE DITCH CHECK FILTER LOGS AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND STABILIZATION CULVERT INLET PROTECTION ELEELE 11. CONTOURS MAY NOT REFLECT BUILDING OR STREET HOLDDOWNS. REFER TO PROFILES, SECTIONS AND DETAILS 12 SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF SHALL BE KEPT AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION FACILITIES USING PRACTICES SUCH AS DIVERSION BERMS AND VEGETATION AROUND THE PERIMETER. THE INFILTRATOIN FACILITY SHALL NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FFINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED. THE FINAL PHASE OF EXCAVATIONS SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, AND BE DONE BY LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT TO AVOID COMPACTION OF THE BASIN FLOOR. THE SOILS OF THE BASIN FLOOR SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A DEPTH NO LESS THAN 24" AT A MAXIMUM COMPACTION OF 85% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY PRIOR TO PLANTING. AT SITES WHERE BLOW COUNTS PER FOOT EXCEED 10, SOILS SHALL BE LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF 5 FEET BEFORE PLANTING. 13. THE UPPER 10" OF INFILTRATION BASIN SOIL SHALL BE TILLED PRIOR TO PLANTING. BUILDING PAD NOTES 1. BUILDING SETBACK: FRONT 30 FEET SIDE GARAGE 5 FEET SIDE HOUSE 10 FEET 2. FB = FULL BASEMENT - NO CHANGE IN REAR GRADE FROM FRONT TO BACK OF HOME) 3. FBLO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT - GRADE AT REAR OF HOME ALLOWS FOR WINDOWS 42" ABOVE BASEMENT FLOOR. 4. FBWO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT - GRADE AT THE REAR OF THE HOME FACILITATES INGRESS AND EGRESS ACCESS. GENERALLY THIS DESIGN ALLOWS FOR A MAXIMUM CEILING HEIGHT OF 8' IN BASEMENT. _no CO I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I c0 \ \ \ \ 'V/,1.�\� 0' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ GRO \ I `-)eitc3I 0 W 0 co EXISTING o co \\\\ HOUSE o m \ RD' 1—cF \ I I \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 1 �� ems • h t cc). rn X 3' CURB TAPER FROM SURMOUNTABLE TO 0" RIBBON CURB 0) r SILT FENCE (TYP) II ASPHALT DRIVEWAY SECTION I GARAGE ••� �q �m . �-�-• rn • \ X 0) 2 00 0 0 0 X 1 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ADJUST LOCATION AS NEEDED INSTALL TWO ROWS OF SOD BEHIND CURB / /— z GILQX 1�06 \ 1 I \ I > 0 \ 0) 3\\ BLOCK �\ SILT FENCE (TYP) BITUMINOUS INTERLOCK AT MATCHLINE / SILT FENCE (TYP) 0 — — o 0 0) J FILTER LOG INSTALLED AFTER CONSTRUCTION AND STABILIZATION + + + + + + + + -+ + -+ + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Y + + ++++++ + ++++++++++++++++++++++ ▪ +++++++++++++++++ ++++ ▪ ++++++++++++;++++.+ +�tt O18 + T + + + +++++++++ +++++++++++� + + + + + ♦ I. ♦ + ♦ + + + + -- + ++++++++++-,,--4 +++++++/ + + + + + + + 0A2 SITE, GRADING, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1"=20' /4 BUILDING PAD CONSTRUCTION c 0 SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER (TYP) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +_-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP) / ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION MARYLANE AVE. N. ++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++ ++++++++++++ * + + + + + + + + + + + � + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++ + ++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + \++++++++++ +++++++ 5 N 0 0 CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION RIP -RAP APRON i 0 LC) 0 X 0'ID +00 1 / N I/ 00 co 0 0 X 3' TRANSITION FROM SURMOUNTABLE TO B618 CURB ON EACH SIDE OF CATCH BASIN. MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CURB AND PAVEMENT Know what's below. Call before you dig. 20 co 60 SCALE IN FEET MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan s e Xon or report was prepared by me, v Ns ct supervision, Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET SITE, GRADING, EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C-201 PROJECT NO. U m \ I\\ram I in LC) LC) / —t--� 916 in / —c_ 1 — /in 15+00 MARYLANE AVE EAST CURB PLAN 1"=20' 925 920 915 910 905 L7 W II 1, / / / L J7f �1 0� \O �90g X g•0 I II I 1 3n ` 3n z_L366 3n CURB STATIONING CORRESPONDS TO MARYLANE AVENUE CENTERLINE STATIONING FROM THE RUTHERFORD STATION DEVELOPMENT J N --1-0— — — — — g050 --Z=606. 0 3+00 910 --__ — - 17.906X �! • — — (f --- - _ 06 x_ X 6.17 i MARYLANE AVE. N. -------vim _ _c _-910---- 6\\ -- ho— ---- \4) 0 0 rn 12+00 CD 0 0) TT� — IJ9o1 09 17111:12/• 016)<-6 X----())-67179+0 o � ---- ---- —5'606 1118 LC) CO PVI STA.= 15+34.• 4 PVI ELEV = - .— H eD cG p p N M co W �I CD .- O II 0 = 910.23 r �- 'T+11,10 11 I,I H ' IIIgi II + rn > LIJ J w 5 0 HILI II -. _ , PO NT TO 11+95.20, PROVI I ING A MINIMUM ■— 0.5 /0 GUTTER SLOPE. ADJU►T � DES AS NECESSARY T TRANSITION TO T PAVEMENT J R SM•OTH 1 • - •' __ - ► .... 1.50% 1.1110 0 6) M Co 6) CV ,— 00 O) LC) 0) co 6) V CA CO O) V LC) U") .1,—, O c cc:, Lc) O) V M -4 6) CO N O) C') 6) N 6) N 6) N O) 0) I� 6) N N O) I,- CO O 6) C) CO O O) LC) N O 6) C) N O O) lf) I- 6) O 0) C7 6) 6) CD 0) CO 6) 0) CO 1"-- I 6) CD 0) CO N 6) 0) C) CO 6) O 0) CO 6) O 0) CO 6) O 0) N 6) CD 0') Cv) C") O) a)CD 0) ' 6) 0') a:.LC) N O O) 6) O O O) 0) CO O O) O O) V 6) co O 0) CO - O) 6) O O O) Cr) CO C) 6) O CS) CV 6) O C) CO O) O O) 15+75 15+50 15+00 MARYLANE AVE EAST CURB PROFILE HOR: 1" = 20' VERT: 1" = 5' 14+50 14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 11+50 925 920 915 910 905 11+00 20 60 MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STI LLWATE R, M I N N ESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan se c' 4on or report was prepared by me, and that I d I undePjYse s i ct supervision, Pr1_ sional Engineer OTA. No \ vc-o Go NS�� Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET MARYLANE AVENUE EAST CURB PLAN & PROFILE 0-202 Know what's below. Call before you dig. SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO. CLS20020 Project Name / Location Project Name Mary Lane Gateway Project Address 8483 Mary Lane North, Stillwater, MN 56031 Latitude / Longitude 43.6384, -93.4448 Site PID# 190303020320050 Project Type Residential Redevelopment Contacts Owner Contractor (Operator) Preparer TBD Conner Deur JAM Freedom LLC Elan Design Lab, Inc. 613 155th Ave 901 N 3rd St. Somerset, WI 54025 Suite 120 651-439-0189 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-260-7982 cdeur@elanlab.com SWPPP Design Certification Expires 2021 General SWPPP Responsibilities The Contractor (Operator) shall provide a knowledgeable and experienced person(s) to oversee the implementation of the SWPPP and the installation. Inspection and maintenance of the erosion and sediment control BMP's before and during construction. Training must be in conformance with the NPDES Construction Permit requirements. Training documentation must kept on -site with the SWPPP and the trained person must be available on -site within 72 hours. Both the Owner and Contractor (Operator) shall be responsible for the proper termination and/or transfer of the permit. The Owner will be responsible for the long term operation and maintenance of the permanent storm water management system(s). Unless specifically stated the engineer (Preparer) shall have no responsibility for any SWPPP activities during or after construction. Project Description The 2.57-acre project site consists of an existing residential community. The proposed project consists of creating four lots on the existing property for the construction of single-family homes. This would include the installation of utilities, pad grading and driveway construction for each lot, and the construction of a stormwater management facility. As part of these improvements, Mary Lane will be partially reconstructed with a surmountable curb and gutter. It is proposed to disturb ^'1.22 acres and adding an estimated 0.45 acres of impervious surface and reconstructing 0.03 acres of impervious. Soils A geotechnical report was prepared on February 08, 2021 for this site. The soils encountered in the borings consisted of both granular (sand) soils and cohesive (clay) soils. The granular soils consisted of silty sand (SM) and poorly -graded sand with silt (SP-SM). The cohesive soils generally consisted of lean clay corresponding of the ASTM Classification of (CL). Receiving Waters The site discharges to Brown's Creek (M-050-012-001-002). This stream has been identified as a trout stream tributary (Minn. R. 6264.0050). Projects discharging to trout streams must incorporate the additional best management practices (BMPs). In addition, the Contractor (Operator) must immediately initiate stabilization and come to complete stabilization within seven (7) calendar days after the construction activity in the portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. Project Plans The following plan sheets are hereby incorporated into this SWPPP Sheet Number Description Date C-010 Demolition Plan 02/24/2021 C-201 Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Plan 02/24/2021 C-202 Marylane Avenue East Curb Plan & Profile 02/24/2021 C-203 SWPPP Narrative 02/24/2021 C-301 Utility Plan 02/24/2021 C-501 - 503 Utility, Erosion & Sediment Control Details 02/24/2021 Stormwater Related Reviews and Permits Agency Type of Permit or Review Status City of Stillwater Site Plan Review, Plat, Building Permit Pending Brown's Creek Watershed District Stormwater Management Review Pending MPCA Construction Stormwater To be acquired by contractor. Stormwater Management System Overview See Stormwater Management Plan incorporated herein by reference for details on system design, flow rates and volumes and system capacities. In general runoff is collected by a new storm sewer system consisting of catchbasins and a pipe network which direct the runoff to an infiltration basin. See Operations and Maintenance Manual for post construction system maintenance requirements. Erosion Prevention Measures - General The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for all erosion prevention measures for the project including but are not limited to the following: 1. The Contractor (Operator) shall plan and implement appropriate construction practice and construction phasing to minimize erosion and retain vegetation whenever possible 2. All areas not to be disturbed shall be delineated with flags, stakes, signs, or other means necessary to protect these areas before construction begins on the site. 3. All drainage ditches and/or swales shall have temporary or permanent stabilization within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water or 24 hours after construction activity in the ditch/swale has temporarily or permanently ceased. 4. All pipe outlets shall have temporary or permanent energy dissipation within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water. 5. All exposed soils shall be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion. In no case shall un- worked areas, including stock piles, have exposed soils for more than 7 days without providing temporary or permanent stabilization. Sediment Control Measures and Timing - General The Operator (Contractor) is responsible for all sediment control measures for the project. Sediment control measures include but are not limited to the following: 1. Sediment control measures shall be established on all down gradient perimeters before any up - gradient land disturbing activities begin. These measures shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established. 2. On slopes with 3:1 or steeper grades there shall be no unbroken slope length greater than 75 feet. 3. All storm drain inlets and culvert inlets shall be protected by an appropriate BMP during construction until all sources with potential for discharging to the inlet has been stabilized. Inlet and culvert protection shall conform to the MnDOT Specifications 2573 and 3891. 4. Stock piles shall be provided with an effective sediment perimeter control and shall not be placed in any type of surface water or drainageway. 5. Vehicle tracking shall be minimized with effective BMP's. Where the BMP's fail to prevent sediment from tracking onto streets the Contractor shall conduct street sweeping to remove all tracked sediment. 6. The Operator is responsible for identifying the need for temporary sediment basins based on actual field conditions to protect downstream resources. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed before up gradient vegetation is disturbed and maintained until the risk of damage to downstream resources is mitigated by other means. Dewatering and Basin Draining Activities - General The Operator is responsible for adhering to all dewatering and surface drainage regulations, including but not limited to the following: 1. Whenever possible water from dewatering activities shall discharge to a temporary and/or permanent sediment basin. 2. If water cannot be discharged to a sedimentation basin, it shall be treated with other appropriate BMP's, to effectively remove sediment. 3. All discharge points shall be protected from erosion and scour. 4. Discharge water shall be dispersed over an effective energy dissipation measure. 5. All water from dewatering shall be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion, or inundation of wetlands. Water shall not be discharged to adjacent residential properties. It must be discharged to the public street. Final Stabilization - General The Operator is responsible for ensuring final stabilization of the site, including but is not limited to the following: 1. All soil disturbing activities have been completed. 2. All exposed soils have been uniformly stabilized with of least 80% perennial vegetation. 3. All drainage ditches, ponds and all storm water conveyance systems have been cleared of sediment and stabilized to preclude erosion. Temporary Sediment Basin During construction the contractor shall excavate and maintain temporary sediment basins as needed to prevent sediment from reaching permanent filtration areas, natural depressions, adjacent residential properties and other environmentally sensitive areas. Construction Sequencing Contractor shall comply with the following sequence. Contractor may make adjustments to the sequence if needed to address their means and methods and unanticipated field conditions. 1. Install rock construction entrance, rumble racks or some other suitable device. Move as necessary as construction progresses. Maintain access to townhomes. 2. Perform clearing and grubbing only to the extent necessary to install perimeter silt fence. 3. Install perimeter silt fence and other barriers at a minimum as indicated on the plan. The contractor is responsible for any additional sediment control that is needed. 4. Complete clearing and grubbing. 5. Construct infiltration basin per plan. Seed and stabilize slopes. Minimize runoff to basin until vegetation has been established. 6. Remove existing pavement within construction limits. Re -grade per plan. 7. Install site utilities. 8. Complete site grading. Remove any excess material from site. 9. Re -spread topsoil in disturbed areas outside of building and pavement areas. 10. Provide temporary erosion control seeding and mulch where active construction is not taking place. 11. Complete landscaping. 12. Flush storm sewer system. Remove any sediment flumes. 13. Monitor vegetation and reinstall as needed until fully established. 14. Remove sediment barriers. 15. File NPDES Notice of Termination ("NOT") with MPCA within 30 days of final stabilization. Inspection and maintenance All inspections, maintenance, repairs, replacements and removal are to be considered incidental to the BMP bid items. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for completing required inspections maintenance and observation of weather conditions and rainfall amounts to ensure compliance with the permit requirements. The Contractor (Operator) shall observe the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. The Contractor (Operator) shall keep a summary maintenance/construction observation report to be recorded after each site visit/observation. The Contractor (Operator) shall submit a copy of the written inspections monthly to the Owner. Records shall include the following: 1. Date and time of inspections 2. Name of person conducting inspection 3. Findings and recommendations for corrective actions if necessary 4. Corrective actions taken 5. Date and amount of rainfalls greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours 6. Mention of any changes made to the SWPPP 7. A site map indicating active construction areas and land disturbing activities. The Contractor (Operator) must keep the SWPPP, all inspection reports and amendments onsite. The Contractor (Operator) shall designate a specific location to keep the records whenever construction activity is in progress. All erosion prevention and sedimentation control BMP's must be inspected to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMP's must be repaired, replaced or supplemented with functional BMP's. The Contractor (Operator) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: 1. All sediment barriers including silt fence, bio-logs, and similar devices must be repaired replaced or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the barrier height. These repairs shall be made within 24 hours of discovery. 2. Temporary and permanent sediment basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery. 3. Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. The Operator shall remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems. The Operator shall re -stabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Removal and stabilization must take place within 7 days of discovery, unless precluded by legal, regulatory or physical constraints. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work. 4. Construction site vehicle exit locations shall be inspected daily for evidence of off -site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from all paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. 5. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for the operation and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality BMP's. As well as erosion and sediment control BMP's for the duration of the construction work at the site. 6. If sediment escapes the construction site, all off -site accumulations of sediment must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off -site impacts. 7. All filtration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is reaching the filtration areas and these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the filtration area. 8. The Contractor is solely responsible for all costs associated with reconstructing the infiltration basin when the functionality is compromised by the contractor's actions or inaction to protect the basin. Pollution Prevention Management Measures The Contractor (Operator) shall be responsible for all pollution prevention management measures. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for informing all visitors and/or personnel on -site of the pollution prevention management measures. All pollution prevention management measures are to be considered incidental to the overall project bid, unless otherwise noted. Pollution prevention management measures include but are not limited to the following: 1. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for the proper disposal, in compliance with MPCA disposal requirements, of all solid or liquid waste and hazardous materials on -site. 2. Concrete trucks shall not be allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water on -site, unless done in an engineered leak -proof containment system. The engineered system provided by the Contractor (Operator) must include site drawings for the project file and written assurance that the system will work as designed and leave no discharge of concrete or concrete residue potential to waters of the state during a minimum of a 100-year storm event. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout system to inform concrete equipment Operators to utilize the proper facilities. The concrete washout containment system and all related items shall be considered incidental to the project bid. 3. All nonhazardous waste materials shall be collected and stored in a securely lidded metal dumpster or other approved containment method at the end of each day. Any alternative to a metal dumpster must be submitted in writing for approval by the project engineer. The dumpster shall be emptied as necessary to function as intended for debris collection. No construction garbage or waste material shall be buried on -site. 4. A licensed sanitary waste management Contractor shall collect all sanitary waste from the portable units at a rate necessary to maintain designed function. 5. All fertilizers shall be stored in a covered shelter. Partially used bags shall be transferred to a sealable bin to reduce the chance of spillage. 6. External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles and engine degreasing are prohibited at the construction site. All vehicles on -site shall be monitored for leaks and receive regular prevention maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Petroleum products shall be stored in tightly sealed containers. Which are clearly labeled. Spill kits shall be included with all fueling sources and maintenance activities. Secondary containment measures shall be installed and maintained by the Operator. 7. Any asphalt substances used on -site shall be applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. 8. All paint containers and curing compounds shall be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint and/or curing compounds shall not be discharged into the storm sewer system and shall be properly disposed of according to manufacturer's instruction. 9. Materials and equipment necessary for spill clean-up shall be kept in an enclosed trailer or shed on -site. Equipment shall include. But not limited to, brooms, mops, dust pans, rags, gloves, goggles, absorbent (kitty litter) oil absorbent booms and diapers and buckets. 10. All spills shall be contained and cleaned up immediately upon discovery. Spills large enough to reach the storm water conveyance system shall be reported to the Minnesota duty officer at 1- 800-422-0798. Quantities Practice Detail / Spec. Unit Quantity Silt Fence A2/C-502 LF 1,280 Fiber Log Sediment Control A3/ C-502 LF 414 Rumble Rack Construction Entrance B2/ C-502 Each 1 Inlet Protection A4/ C-502 Each 1 Erosion Control Blanket A4/C-501 SY 366 Sod & Landscaping MnDot 3878 SY 2,059 Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Maintenance of the storm water management facilities will be the responsibility of the Owner and may be subject to an agreement with the City of Stillwater. See Operation and Maintenance manual for guidance. Amendments to the SWPPP The SWPPP will be amended as needed and/or as required by provisions of the permit. Amendments will be approved by both the Owner and Contractor (Operator) and will be attached to the SWPPP as an additional sheet. The SWPPP and amendments will be kept on site by the Contractor (Operator) whenever construction activity is in progress. MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STI LLWATE R, M I N N ESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering 1 Landscape Architecture 1 Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, s ee on or report was prepared by me; r( ct supervision, and that I d csPr• sional Engineer undse stetOf i� OTA. A` Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET SWPPP 0-203 PROJECT NO. CLS20020 UTILITY NOTES VERIFY ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN LOCATED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHOULD BE NOTED AND FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER. 2. ALL CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC UTILITIES TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF STILLWATER DESIGN STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE MEANS AND METHODS TO ASSURE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS NOT DAMAGED DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION. 4. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. 5. PIPE MATERIALS: STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE WATER SANITARY RCP OR DUAL WALL HDPE PVC (SDR 26) COPPER (TYPE K) PVC (SDR 26) 6. ALL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM WITH STATE, CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND CITY OF STILLWATER STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 7. ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS TO MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 8. WATER LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 7.5' TO A MAXIMUM 10' OF COVER. 9. SEE DETAILS C3/C-503 AND C4/C-503 FOR PIPE BEDDING. LEGEND w w «« UE UE OE OE UT UT G G SANITARY SEWER DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELECOMM GAS r X X Lit 0 Iw 0 w 0 w w 0 w 0 w 0_ 0 mo CO w 0 w 0 w 0 in r 1 I I I I L_ J t in WATER SERVICE (TYP) 1 CURB STOP (TYP) / INV = 903.41 w a _ 33' OF 4" PVC 3 v @2% C1 C-503 v - 3n - In 311 0 311 2 LOCATE AND MARK ENDS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES BEFORE STARTING STREET CONSTRUCTION 117 3n 0 3 BLOCK 1 in 3n 3n L L_ / I I •/ 4 CO O CO O 0 - CONNECT 30" RCP TO EXIST STMH ADJUSTED RIM = 910.0' INV = 905.0' (S) w 0 WATER SERVICE w C2 w C-503 SEWER SERVICE (TYP) w w w w w w w v ♦♦ • 1 • ♦ OCS 3 TOP= 905.0 INV = 901.50 (SE) INV = 902.64 (W) / • I • 5 30" PIPE INV = 901.92 TOP OF 30" PIPE 904.65 42" PIPE INV=905.12- BOTTOM OF 12" PIPE 905.0 v w / STM H RIM=909.3 w 33' OF 4" PVC @ 2.0% STORM MANHOLE (STMH) 25' - 24' RCP @ 0.20% STMH 2 RIM = 905.00' INV = 900.75 , �� �0 ti "77 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (OCS) 6 CONNECT 30" RCP TO EXIST STMH ADJUSTED RIM = 909.0' INV = 901.6' (N & E) -77 ? 30" HD C3 & C4 0000-,-71111111111 PE @ p,5°10 STMH A BURRIED RIM=906 INV=901 . W PLAN Al A AlA A A AI A A A A A A A A A A A CATCH BASIN MANHOLE (CBMH) C-502J MOMENTUM PRESERVER BAFFLE CB 4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > r ' ^ U RIM = 908.96' INV = 905.30 4' SUMP SKIMMER BAFFLE r^ MARYLANE AVE. N. 8"x4" PVC WYE INV @ MAIN = 902.25 dA 0 8"x4" PVC WYE INV @ MAIN = 901.0' A A A w §0' (BOTH DIRECTIONS) - 4" PRF PVC DRAIN TILE LOCATED AT BOTTOM OF SELECT GRANULAR SUB -BASE. BED TILE IN CHOKER COARSE OF ASTM # 8 STONE FLARED END SECTION (FES) FES 1 INV = 900.7 SET FES AS CLOSE AS PRACTICAL TO EXISTING FES. FORM RIP RAP INTO A •SINGLE STILLING BASIN 1 EXPOSE COVER ON EXISTING STMH RIM=906.0 INV=901.5 PLAN N EXISTING o,N HOUSE STM H BURRIED RIM=906.6 PLAN INV=901.6 N PLAN COORDINATE ADJUSTMENT OF _pEBESTALS AND -CABLES TO FINISHED GRADE WITH THE APPROPRIATE I UTILITY COMPANIES w w 20 • 60 MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan s e Xon or report was prepared by me, X i ct supervision, andthat I�ad� s d Pr�� sional Engineer and e s tgof i h . OTA. co Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET UTILITY PLAN 0-301 RI UTILITY PLAN 1"=20' Know what's below. Call before you dig. SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO. CLS20020 R=12" R=28" SLOPE 1/4" PER FT. 17.5" 10.5" 28" R=68" SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER TACK COAT ALL EDGES 1/2 THICKNESS OF EXISTING PAVEMENT NO SCALE 6" MIN MILL AND OVERLAY NEW PAVEMENT SAW CUT , � . �' oI MA SEE NOTE 1 r LI�L ...440I LLL L III�� L I��IL IIILI ��1.41LILI I ILILI L.t_Im 4�I_I_II �L"kj��_'EXISTING AGGREGATE ' =L,.. BASE COURSE AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 6" NOTES: 1. SAW CUT AND REMOVE A MINIMUM 2" OF EXISTING PAVEMENT, PROVIDING A MINIMUM 4" GAP BETWEEN CURB AND SAW CUT PAVEMENT EDGE. 2. SAW CUT ALL EDGES. REMOVE BITUMINOUS AND ENOUGH AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL TO ACCOMMODATE NEW PAVEMENT. EXTEND 6" AGGREGATE BASE TO 6" BEYOND THE BACK OF CURB BITUMINOUS INTERLOCK AT MATCH LINE SLOPE 3/4" PER FT. B618 CURB & GUTTER NO SCALE ZCONC. DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (0 CURB GUTTER LINE C 4' EXPANSION JOINT PLAN ENTRANCE WIDTH 4' GUTTER TOP B-618 CURB i ELEVATION CURB DETAIL AT DRIVEWAYS 0 eller THE ®IRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DRIVEWAY DETAIL DRWYDTLI DRWG NO. 35 3.0" BITUMINOUS 41 WEAR 1 /2"R 6" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5) COMPACTED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE NOTES: 1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE TO BE SAVED. FENCE SHALL COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE THE TREE(S) OR RUN CONTINUOUSLY ON THE CONSTRUCTION SIDE OF THE TREE(S) BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. MINIMIZE IMPACTS AND AVOID DRIVING POSTS OR STAKES INTO MAJOR ROOTS. 2. FOR ROOTS OVER 1-IN DIA. THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, MAKE A CLEAN, STRAIGHT CUT TO REMOVE THE DAMAGED PORTION. ALL EXPOSED ROOTS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY COVERED WITH DAMP BURLAP TO PREVENT DRYING, AND SHALL BE COVERED WITH SOIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 3. WORK WITHIN PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE DONE MANUALLY. NO STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, OR STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR MACHINERY SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF THE FENCING. NO SCALE 1 �J►�l___7e: ;::?ff! TREE PROTECTION FENCE 2.0% BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1.5" WEAR COURSE (SPWEA240B) 2.5" BASE COURSE (SPNWB230B) 6.0" AGGREGATE BASE, CL5 24.0" SELECT GRANULAR MARYLANE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE NO SCALE f9 GUTTER 4'-6" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 3'-0" NEEHAH R-3067 OR EQUAL 3'-0" GURB REjvRN co 6" TAPER CONC. CURB & GUTTER TO MATCH CASTING PLAN 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT — 2- #4 X 5'-0" LONG J-V \,1-%0 I IINV "'\/ \ / \ 11 TOP OF CURB PLAN RIM ELEV — 0.10' SECTION * INSTALL EXTERNAL SEALING SYSTEM MANUFACTURED BY INFI-SHIELD. DISTRIBUTED BY ESS BROS. & SONS INC. CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION FOR B-618 AND B-624 C. & G. ger THE OINTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CATCH BASIN DETAIL CBDTL4 DRWG NO. 23 0.5' 40' 20' FIRST FLOOR BASEMENT FLOOR -C GARAGE FLOOR 1.0' TOPSOIL MAX. J o.\�% j ANY AVAILABLE SOIL MATERIAL UNLESS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER HOLD DOWN HOLD DOWN 1.0' TOPSOIL MAX. STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) / %/W 7/%/WWWWW////// SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (BOTTOM MUST BE APPROVED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.) HOLD DOWNS FB - 3 FT. FBLO - 2 FT. FBWO - 2 FT. W/W//WWW//WWi SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (BOTTOM MUST BE APPROVED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.) THIS IS A GENERALIZED DETAIL ILLUSTRATING STRUCTURAL FILL REQUIREMENTS. FOLLOW CONTOURS SHOWN ON PLAN BUILDING PAD CONSTRUCTION 1. APPLY LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEED BEFORE LAYING THE NET OR MAT. 2. START LAYING THE NET FROM THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL OR SLOPE AND UNROLL IT DOWN THE GRADE. ALLOW NETTING TO LAY LOOSELY ON THE SOIL BUT WITHOUT WRINKLES - DO NOT STRETCH. MAT OR BLANKET - TYPE PRODUCT SHOULD PROVIDE AT LEAST 30% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE WHERE IT IS APPLIED. 3. TO SECURE THE NET, BURY THE UPSLOPE END IN A SLOT OR TRENCH NO LESS THAN 6 INCHES DEEP, COVER WITH SOIL, AND TAMP FIRMLY AS SHOWN. STAPLE THE NET EVERY 12 INCHES ACROSS THE TOP END AND EVERY 3 FOOT AROUND THE EDGES AND BOTTOM. WHERE 2 STRIPS OF NET ARE LAID SIDE BY SIDE, THE ADJACENT EDGES SHOULD BE OVERLAPPED 3 INCHES AND STAPLED TOGETHER. EACH STRIP OF NETTING SHOULD ALSO BE STAPLED DOWN THE CENTER, EVERY 3 FOOT. DO NOT STRETCH THE NET WHEN APPLYING STAPLES. 4. TO JOIN TWO STRIPS, CUT A TRENCH AND ANCHOR THE END OF THE NEW NET. OVERLAP THE END OF THE PREVIOUS ROLL 18 INCHES, AS SHOWN, AND STAPLE EVERY 12 INCHES JUST BELOW THE ANCHOR SLOT TYPICAL STAPLES #8 GAUGE WIRE 44, 44, MAINTENANCE: INSPECT ALL MULCHES PERIODICALLY, AFTER RAINSTORMS TO CHECK FOR RILL EROSION, DISLOCATION, OR FAILURE. WHEN EROSION IS OBSERVED, APPLY ADDITIONAL MULCH. IF WASHOUT OCCURS, REPAIR THE SLOPE GRADE, RESEED, AND REINSTALL MULCH. CONTINUE INSPECTIONS UNTIL VEGETATION IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED. 10" 1/2" O'';,,s.... ////1111 H .IIIL /////////(llIUI %-11111:2 O 0: II 01 %iiii15 i���i4::CC---------------- lllllllllllllllllll \IIIJ \Il?/ AL PRESS ENDS 6 INCHES INTO THE SOIL AROUND STRUCTURES AND STAPLE SECURELY WHEN USING NETTING IN CHANNELS, ROLL OUT STRIPS OF NETTING PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE MULCH. AIILL AIILL viv Alc AIILL — FLOW vlv FLOW Apppp 110100// 11,2/4 AIL Alc AIL Alc Allc ILL FLOW vlv >14 Aromoror ,LIII-i 11 111111— it FLOW I* & A. BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING STRIPS IN A TRENCH 6 INCHES OR MORE IN DEPTH. B. TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10 INCH SPACING, 4 INCHES DOWN FROM THE TRENCH. . OVERLAP - BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN "A" AND "B". OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 18 INCHES AND STAPLE. D. EROSION STOP - FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SLIT TRENCH AND TAMPED DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES. NO SCALE MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan s e ' 4on or report was prepared by me, X,�,L i ct supervision, andthat I�ad� s d Pr�� sional Engineer and e s tgof i h . OTA. No \ NS�� vc-o Go Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET DETAILS 0-501 DRIVEWAY DETAIL NO SCALE CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION NO SCALE Ci;kL—D NO SCALE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PROJECT NO. CLS20020 PLAN VIEW T 6" 6" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" w 58" 58" 72" 72" 86" 86" 100" 100" 113" 113" 119" 119" H TO SUIT CASTING IMENSIONS OPENING ECC.ICON ECC.ICON. ECC.ICON ECC.ICON. ECC.ICON ECC.ICON. REINF. FOR STREET LOADING ALTERNATE COVER SLAB FOR NEENAH R-3067 CASTING PRE -CAST SECTION (18" OR SMALLER INLET OR OUTLET) -- W=SLAB DIA SECTION NEENAH CASTING R-1733 W/ CENTER PICK HOLE OR EQUAL. 1 4 ADJUSTING RINGS W/MORTAR JOINTS. PLASTER OUTSIDE OF RINGS W/MORTAR. r T PRE -CAST SECTION WITH GASKETS. CONCRETE BLOCK MASONRY TO BE BUILT TO OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE (21" OR OVER INLET OR OUTLET) 8" MIN. STORM SEWER M.H. TYPE "B"(B-I) THRU "G"(G-I) THE OIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA STORM SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL M H DTL3 DRWG NO. 31 STORM SEWER MANHOLE (STMH) NO SCALE A SEE MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 3133C FOR DEPTH AND VOLUME OF RIPRAP REQ'D. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MATERIAL SHALL BE USED FOR FILTER BLANKET. B sal 1' SEC. A -A •I:t: Aqi RIPRAP - SEE SPECS. wir , APo IIPIPOAVIP roirel.trirnetalmri.A1111"reelitk. 5 X DIAMETER OR SPAN PLAN SEC. B-B B SLOPE VARIES ale - THE OIOTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA APRON DETAIL APDTL2 DRWG NO. 18 GALVANIZED "U" BOLT FASTENERS - 2 PER JOINT LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE AT 60° FROM THE TOP C OF THE PIPE. TIE THREE JOINTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN. GALVANIZED TRASH GUARD 1/2" 0 ROD AT 6" O.C. SEE DETAIL FOR RIPRAP AT R.C.P. APRONS. "U" BOLT REQUIREMENTS PIPE SIZE BOLT DIA. WIDTH 21" & LESS 1/2" 24" 24" TO 36" 5/8" 24" 42" TO 54" 3/4" 24" 60" & GREATER 1" 24" CONCRETE APRON 0 aler THE OIOTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA APRON DETAIL APDTLI DRWG NO. 17 6'6" FLARED END SECTION (FES) 4" #13 Beam 3" schedule 40 pipe ALTERNATE - RUMBLE RACKS 2" x 2" WOOD POSTS 4' O.C. RUNOFF FLOW FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI- ENVIRO FENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL) MIN. 30" - MAX. 36" ABOVE GRADE BACKFILL 6" x 6" TRENCH 11 11 _I UNDISTURBED SOIL IIII 111. NOTES 1. DIG A 6"X6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED FENCE LINE. 2. DRIVE ALL POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH. 3. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ON THE UPHILL SIDE ALONG THE FENCE LINE, AND BACK FILL. 4. SPACE WOOD POSTS UP TO 4' APART TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC. 5. REMOVE SILT FENCE AFTER TURF IS ESTABLISHED. NO SCALE BACK OF CURB LINE MANHOLE DIMENSION CHART DIM MANHOLE TYPE B-1 C-1 D-1 E-1 F-1 G-1 P 48" 60" 72" 84" 96" 102" K 14" 13" 13" 13" 13.5" 13.5" T6" 8" 8" 8" 8" 8" W 58" 72" 86" 100" 113" 119" A 3" 11" 18" 25" 31" 34" DEPTH VARIES PRECAST SECTION - STEPS LOCATION AM'f&b. %VP COVER SLAB W = SLAB DIA. 18" 18" w w �N wuJ GROUT 24"x 36" OPENING PIPE REINFORCE SLAB FOR STREET LOADING NEENAH CASTING R-3067 OR EQUAL 2-4 2"THICK ADJUST. RINGS W/MORTAR JOINTS - PLASTER OUTSIDE, STRIKE INSIDE CLEAN. RUBBER GASKET TYPICAL ALL JOINTS R.C.P. BARREL SECTION CONC. BLOCK MASONRY TO BE USED ONLY WHERE NECESSARY. PLASTER OUTSIDE, STRIKE INSIDE CLEAN I- 8., Fr T 4 8" POURED 6" PRECAST * INSTALL EXTERNAL SEALING SYSTEM MANUFACTURED BY INFI-SHIELD. DISTRIBUTED BY ESS BROS. & SONS INC. MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN TYPE B-1 THRU G-1 THE SIOTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CATCH BASIN MANHOLE DETAIL M H DTL2 DRWG NO. 30 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE (CBMH) SIDE BY SIDE INSTALLATION For Side By Side Installations (i.e. (2) mats wide at the entrance, use short -straps to connect mats as shown in diagram. Contact your distributor or FODS with any additional questions. FODS MAT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2"X2"X16" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT MAXIMUM 4' SPACING. INCREASE SPACING IN HIGH FLOW AREAS. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE FILTER LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45d WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. RUNOFF FLOW 8" - 12" FILTER LOG SEDIMENT CONTROL STAKE 8"-12" FILTER LOG SEDIMENT CONTROL NO SCALE USE KNITTED POLYPROPYLENE TUBES FOR TEMPORARY INSTALLATIONS OR JUTE OR BURLAP WHEN DEGRADATION IN PLACE IS DESIRED. NO SCALE FOR NEW MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE PIPE PROTRUSION (L) STRUCTURE DIAMETER MAXIMUM PIPE DIAMETER* DISSIPATOR ONLY SKIMMER ONLY DISSIPATOR & SKIMMER 48" 27" 24" 15" 60" 36" 30" 24" 72" 48" 42" 30" 84" 48" 36" 96" 48" *RECOMMENDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACING BETWEEN COMPONENTS FOR ACCESS & MAINTENANCE. REFER TO MANHOLE SIZING CHARTS FOR MORE DETAILED STRUCTURE SIZING OR CONTACT MOMENTUM FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAILS. PRESERVER'. COMPONENTS ACCOMMODATE PIPE SIZES UP TO 48" DIAMETER. PART NUMBER** PIPE DIAMETER ALLOWABLE PEAK FLOW D15/S15 0"-15" 20CFS D21 / S21 16"-21" 35 CFS D27 / S27 22"-27" 60 CFS D36 / S36 28"-36" 100 CFS D48 / S48 37"-48" 175 CFS "D" = DISSIPATOR, PLACED AT INLET(S) "S" = SKIMMER, PLACED AT OUTLET NOTE 2: MINIMIZE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INLET AND OUTLET INVERTS FOR THE PRESERVERTN TO FUNCTION AS DESIGNED. SUMP MANHOLE REFER TO MANHOLE SIZING CHART TO ENSURE PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIGN FEASIBILITY NOTE 1: THE PRESERVER'. ENERGY DISSIPATOR WAS DESIGNED AND TESTED TO FUNCTION WITH OR WITHOUT A SKIMMER. DISSIPATORS & SKIMMERS CAN BE UTILIZED IN TANDEM OR INDEPENDENTLY. CROSS SECTION AA ZDDMIN .3 12" HDPE 902.30' Do MIN. NOTE 3: STOCK SKIMMERS HAVE A MINIMUM FREEBOARD DEPTH OF Do. FOR GREATER FREEBOARD DEPTHS, DESIGNERS CAN UPSIZE THE SKIMMER, OR USE A CUSTOMIZED SKIMMER. FOR CUSTOM DESIGNS, AND/OR PROJECT SPECIFIC DETAILS, CONTACT MOMENTUM. Not to Scale 4 .omEnrum 877-773-0073 • www.MomentumEnv.com STORM GRATE REINFORCED CORNER MANAGEABLE 2 FOOT CONTAINMENT AREA THE PRESERVER. STANDARD INSTALL DETAIL ENERGY DISSIPATOR AND/OR SKIMMER P+R�O�UDLY OUMJAY MAMMALS] Ismbewitte '1Cc" �4,altOPC Js•SPhit-. 4,44l-= CONCEPTUAL PLAN DISCLAIMER THIS GENERIC DETAIL DOES NOT ENCOMPASS THE SIZING, FIT, AND APPLICABILITY OF THE PRESERVER FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT. IT IS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER TO ASSURE THAT THE STORMWATER SYSTEM DESIGN IS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. MOMENTUM ENVIRONMENTAL LLC DOES NOT APPROVE PLANS, SIZING, OR SYSTEM DESIGNS. THE DESIGN ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DESIGN DECISIONS. CATCH BASIN MANHOLE SKIMMER (CBMH) CURB OPENING DUMPING STRAPS CURB FILTER OPTIONAL OUTFLOW PORTS NO SCALE MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, s elf lion or report was prepared by me, l i ct supervision, and that I a�ppt� d I d Pr. - sional Engineer undert6lshe s OTA. Xs G°S v ° Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 G-\ DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET DETAILS 0-502 SILT FENCE DETAIL NO SCALE FILTER LOG SEDIMENT CONTROL NO SCALE INLET PROTECTION NO SCALE PROJECT NO. CLS20020 MARK SERVICE LOCATION AND END OF PIPE WITH 4" X 4" LUMBER. EXTEND CURB BOX TO LOT GRADE v PROPERTY LINE CURB BOX URB STOP 10 ft. BEYOND PROP. LINE NOTES: STREET 1. SEE SPECS FOR SIZE & TYPE OF MATERIALS. 2. MAINTAIN 18" VERTICAL & 24" HORIZONTAL BETWEEN SEWER & WATER SERVICE LINES. cr w 0 0 SEE SPECS. WATERMAIN (LOC. VARIES) CORPORATION STOP COPPER WATER SERVICE WITH HORIZONTAL LOOPS TO PROVIDE FOR SETTLEMENT SEPARATION WATER SERVICE CONNECTION **** EXCEPT FOR LOT 7 - EXTEND AS SHOWN ON PLANS. THE ®IRTH PLACE mF MINN EsoTA WATERMAIN DETAIL WSVDTL1 DRWG NO. 14 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION PLANT NATIVE PLANTS TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND DROUGHT BOTTOM ELEVATION TOLERANCE 0.05'± EXTEND FILTRATION MEDIA AND DRAINAGE LAYER TO HWL MPCA FILTRATION MEDIA MIX B i\ ////// NON -COMPACTED EXISTING SM SOIL (SCARIFY TO DEPTH OF 12") EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL WITH WASHED SAND (ASTM C-33) NO SCALE /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\// INFILTRATION BASIN /\ \\\ //\ TOP OF PLANTING MEDIUM 901.8' LENGTH VARIES TO SUIT DEPTH BENDS AS NECESSARY CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SEE SERVICE DETAIL. IMBED RISER IN TRENCH WALL. SLOPE VARIES. NOTE: FOR SIZE AND TYPE OF MATERIALS SEE SPECS. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RISER 41°llhivaer THE 5I49TH PLACE mF MINN ESCTA SEWER DETAIL SEWDTL3 DRWG NO. 10 OVERFLOW ELEV 902.5' BOTTOM OF PLANTING MEDIUM 900.0' APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF SM SOIL 890.4' NO SCALE SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION NO SCALE 2' x 10" TREATED WOOD REMOVABLE WEIR WALL TOP 902.9 d d PLACE SANDBAGS IN OPENINGS UNTIL VEGETATION IN THE BASIN IS ESTABLISHED AND WEIR IS INSTALLED 4' WIDE WEIR 902.5 1.5' WIDE WEIR 902.0 15" HDPE INLET INV 902.64 TOP 905.0 4 a4 4 d CAST KEYWAY HAALA PS4x8H GRATE 4.0' WIDE WEIR 903.0 4" NOTCH IE 902.5 901.4 24" HDPE OUTLET INV 901.4 d d c 4 a 4 ad REINFORCED BASE SLAB 1 CAST KEYWAY 2" x 8" TREATED WOOD PLANKS WATER PROOF CAULK BETWEEN BOARDS - INSTALL AFTER VEGETATION IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE BASED ON 8' X 4' BOX CULVERT NO SCALE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. PLACE BEDDING MATERIAL. SHAPE TO MATCH PIPE, REMOVE MATERIAL FOR BELLS 2. COMPACT OUTER BEDDING 3. INSTALL PIPE TO LINE AND GRADE 4. PLACE AND COMPACT THE HAUNCH AREA TO SPRINGLINE 5. COMPLETE BACKFILL TO SPECIFICATIONS. II=II %iVVV\iV \/� Do/6 12"MIN Do/3 GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: BEDDING THICKNESS t=Do/24, BUT NOT LESS THAN 3" IN ROCK t=Do/12, BUT NOT LESS THAN 6" IF UNSTABLE TRENCH BOTTOM SUBGRADE CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED, ADDITIONAL CRUSHED ROCK FOR BEDDING AND EXTENT SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. TRENCH SHALL BE BRACED, SHEETED OR SLOPED AS NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY OF WORKMEN AND PROTECTION OF OTHER UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. TRENCH BACKFILL ENGINEERED FILL: SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIAL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS HAUNCHING AND INITIAL BACKFILL: ENGINEERED FILL 1" MAX. PARTICLE DIA. BEDDING MATERIAL MIDDLE BEDDING PLACED LOOSELY CONCRETE PIPE BEDDING WHERE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AND REPLACE WITH A FOUNDATION OF CLASS I OR II MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION HAUNCHING AND INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE CLASS I, II OR III AND INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION. MINIMUM COVER = 12" TO FINISH GRADE SURFACE MOUND AND COMPACT TO 48" COVER DURING CONSTRUCTION 4" MIN. (D=4"-24") 6" MIN. (D>24") LINE OF TRENCH FINAL BACKFILL D W 4" 21" 6" 23" 8" 26" 10" 28" 12" 31" 15" 34" 18" 39" 24" 48" SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFILL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS INITIAL BACKFILL HAUNCHING BEDDING HDPE PIPE BEDDING NO SCALE NO SCALE MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan se c' 4on or report was prepared by me, and that I d I underjYse s i ct supervision, Pr._ sional Engineer OTA. No \ NS�� vc-o Go Stephen M. Johnston REGISTRATION NO. 18914 DATE 02/26/2021 SHEET DETAILS 0-503 PROJECT NO. CLS20020 m TREE PRESERVATION NOTES 1. TREE INVENTORY IDENTIFIED AND LOCATED BY REHDER FORESTRY CONSULTING, 612-760-3519. 2. NO VEGETATION CLEARING, PRUNING, AND TREE REMOVAL TO BE STARTED WITHOUT COORDINATION WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. TREES TO BE SAVED AND/OR REMOVED TO BE MARKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ANY REMOVAL. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES, SHRUBS, AND VEGETATION WHERE NOTED. UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL WILL REQUIRE REPLACEMENT AND POSSIBLE RESTITUTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF TREES NOTED TO BE SAVED ARE DAMAGED AND CONSIDERED LOST PER THE CITY'S STANDARDS, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REQUIRED REPLACEMENT AND FINANCIAL PENALTY. 3. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE PRIOR TO COMMENCING GRADING ACTIVITIES. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE AROUND TREES TO BE SAVED AT A DISTANCE IN FEET FROM TREE EQUAL TO THE TREE DIAMETER (DBH). SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE MUST BE INSTPECTED BY CITY STAFF PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK. MAINTAIN FENCES FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF AND SEEDING, REMOVE FENCES AND DISPOSE OFFSITE. 4. NO MATERIALS, VEHICLES, OR EQUIPMENT CAN BE STORED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION AREAS. 5. AVOID TRIMMING OR CLEARING OAK STANDS BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1 TO PREVENT INSECT TRANSMISSION. IF ANY PRUNING OR WOUNDING OAK OCCURS DURING THIS PERIOD, COVER THE WOUND WITH A RECOMMENDED TREE WOUND DRESSING IMMEDIATELY. FRESH OAK STUMPS MUST LEGBE05ATED, COVERED, AND GROUND OUT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FELLING OF TREES. TREE & VEGETATION CLEARING IMPACTS ON SAVED TREE ■ ■ — TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE PRESERVATION SUMMARY CANOPY COVER 1" DBH = 1' RADIUS CANOPY REMOVE TREE Tag Remove DBH Species Cond Notes 1 Off Site 2 12 Spruce, white Fair 3 10 Spruce, white Fair 4 16 Spruce, white Fair 5 13 Spruce, white Fair 6 12 Spruce, white Fair 7 51 Maple, silver Fair 8 16 Aspen, quacking Good 9 22 Boxelder Fair 10 18 Ash, green Fair 11 X 10 Elm, american Fair 12 15 Elm, american Good 13 7 Elm, american Fair 14 8 Elm, american Fair 15 X 11 Apple Fair 16 12 Apple Fair 2 Multistem 17 23 Cherry, black Fair 2 Multistem 18 15 Ash, green Fair 19 X 21 Cottonwood, eastern Good 20 X 21 Walnut, black Good 21 X 66 Maple, silver Fair 3 Multistem - 22,22,22 22 X 33 lAsh, green Fair 3 Multistem - 20,7, 6 23 30 Maple, silver Fair 24 51 Maple, silver Fair 2 Multistem - 26, 25 25 28 Basswood, american Fair 2 Multistem - 26, 25 26 22 Oak, red Very Good 27 9 Spruce, white Fair 28 18 Elm, american Fair 29 30 Maple, silver Fair 30 10 Spruce, white Fair 31 Off Site 32 16 Elm, american Fair 33 19 Elm, american Fair TOTAL EXISTING ON -SITE SIGNIFICANT TREES 31 TREES 645 INCHES REMOVED 6 TREES 162 INCHES (25%) IMPACTED (SAVED TREE, COUNTED AS LOST 2 TREES 81 INCHES (13%) TOTAL REMOVED 38% NO TREE REPLACEMENT IS REQUIRED (50% MAX ALLOWANCE) z- \ V ..--" ---- / \ \ 7v•—� I/ ) / /- / / / / / / I r" / / , / 1 \ / / / / 7 1 \ / / / ( / / I I — L \ \ \ \ \ \N \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ 0 \ \ N I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ---'7— \ _ \ / / / j�I J / L ` I I\ 0 \ \co 0 \ N #7 \ / / / / // / / / / / — / // / / / / / / / / v i v / -vi / / 7 — t---E—� EXISTING HOUSE 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I\ I I \ I 0 \ 0 [\\ \ \ \ I I I I I 1 I 1 li II / / ARAGE \O 0 / / / / / 3�1 THEE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) REMOVE TREES \ I \ Err \ / 7 TREES N IMPACTED♦ ♦ 12% IMPACTS ON CANOPY COVER 24% IMPACTS ON CANOPY COVER / i �7 '3n �--1 an w \ w 1 w \♦ #20 4-- in 3n - _ Imo 3n w / #10 REMOVE -TREE / -�� w w w / —994 w REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE PROTECT TREES & VEGETATION / TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) MARYLANE AVE. N. w — 90A- REMOVE TREE TREE PROTECTION — FENCE (TYP) IV / vv 20 60 MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan w under my direct su e Licensed L stat Xred by me, or Ct Itthe laws of the I am a duly Pilarsinee Saraithong DATE REGISTRATION NO. 45059 XX/XX/2020 SHEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L-010 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Know what's below. Call before you dig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x 7. APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RING AROUND ALL TREES. 8. SOD SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE INSTALLED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SOD SHALL CONFORM WITH MNDOT 3878.2A, BE DENSE, AND OF UNIFORM TEXTURE, FREE OF WEEDS AND DISEASE. APPLY MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL (MNDOT 3877) AND THOROUGHLY APPLY SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER TO TOP TWO (2) INCHES BEFORE LAYING SOD. 9. FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTS IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD IS TWO FULL YEARS FROM DATE OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY PERIOD FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED AFTER JUNE 1ST SHALL COMMENCE THE FOLLOWING YEAR. PLANT SCHEDULE KEY QUANT. DECIDUOUS TREES I,dllull IIIIAIIIJII I�uii d iull idlllAllull loll ONE FLAG PER WIRE COMPACT PLANTING SOIL — SCARIFY SIDES OF PIT PRIOR TO PLANTING COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE 5 ESPRESSO KENTUCKY GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS 2.5" CAL. COFFEETREE 'ESPRESSO-JFS' 3" MIN.- 8" DIAMETER 2-PLY CORRUGATED HDPE GUARDS UV INHIBITOR -TREATED WHITE EXTERIOR WITH BLACK INNER SURFACE SET BOTTOM FIRMLY IN SOIL MULCH DISH I I I AINJ l I III II,d1IIJ I I (IIAIIIJII MIA NOTES ROOT COND. MATURE SIZE B&B 50'H X 35'W TREE GUARDS MAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONAL TO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARE SHOWN. mulll I\uuAlNdll�m III III II MOUND SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING PLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALL DUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALL DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREE INTERVALS 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP 8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDE I fOF PREVAILING WIND uil,ym1Ik1.0, TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE OR FIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT AT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINE CUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.), WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD MULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL WATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS NO SCALE LEGEND r EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE & CANOPY COVER LANDSCAPE PLAN +++ + + + + i + + + + SOD GENERAL ROADSIDE SEEDING SEE SHEET C-201 FOR SEEDING NOTES STORMWATER SEEDING SEE SHEET C-201 FOR SEEDING NOTES 7 B ADJUST LOCATIONS OF TREES TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC i EXISTING TREES & VEGETATION INFILTRATION BASIN n n n EXISTING TREES & VEGETATION PRESERVATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING VEGETATION COVERS OUTSIDE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BY HOMEOWNER (TYP) MARYLANE AVE. N. • ♦ FOUNDATION PLANTING AROUND HOUSE BY OTHERS (TYP) 1"=20' 1- INSTALL STREET TREE 10' FROM RIGHT-OF-WAY (TYP) DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING (TYP) O Know what's below. Call before you dig. 20 1 60 SCALE IN FEET MISSY HAUSE JEFF HAUSE JAM FREEDOM, LLC 613 155TH AVE SOMERSET, WI 54025 651-442-6555 PROJECT MARYLANE GATEWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 02/26/2021 REVISION DATE Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan wXred by me, or under my direct su .e I am a duly Licensed L. . c. ii ct u r the laws of the statgof �'+ A O O� F -�ON �Oc ONS� G Pilarsinee Saraithong REGISTRATION NO. 45059 DATE 02/26/2020 SHEET LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1O1 PROJECT NO. CLS20020