The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-01-07 HPC Packetiwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION HERITAGE PRESERVATION MEETING NOTICE THE STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION WILL MEET MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 2002 700PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET AGENDA Approval of the December 3, 2001 minutes 1 Case No DR/O 1-42 Design review of a awning at 243 South Main Street Mark Hanson, applicant 2 Case No DR/02-1 Design review of an extenor sign for Shield Plus at 221 East Myrtle Street James Mahnke, applicant 3 Case DR/02-2 Design review of a building renovation at 270 North Main Street John and Melissa Uppgren, applicants Other items a Update on proposed parking structure by Mulberry Point b Update on Churchill Nelson & Slaughter Addition CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651 430-8800 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 3, 2001 Present Beth Diem, Phil Eastwood, Diane Hark, Jeff Johnson, Brent Peterson, and Roger Tomten Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent Chairman Howard Lieberman Vice Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Johnson questioned the height restnction of the lettenng in the Jiffy Lube sign, Case No DR/01-38, saying he recalled the condition was to allow lettenng 40 or 42 inches in height Ms Hark said she recalled the height was 40 inches (The recording secretary's minutes confirmed the height was set at 40 inches) Mr Tomten, seconded by Mr Eastwood, moved approval of the Nov 5, 2001, minutes with that correction Case No DR/01-41 Design review of building addition and signage for Bethany Evangehcal Covenant Church, 6490 Stillwater Blvd Bruce Caulfield of Busch Caulfield Architects Inc representing applicant Mr Caulfield was present to discuss the request for an 8,000-square-foot addition south of the existing structure He provided samples of the proposed matenals which will be the same as being used in the renovation of the existing structure The requested internally illuminated sign is a little over 8 feet high, 92 square feet total The sign will be placed in the same location as the existing sign, 40 to 50 feet from the property line, he stated The only new lighting will be under the canopy at the entrance of the building There was some question as to the allowable height of the sign Mr Russell noted that since the church is in a residentially zoned area, the City has complete control over that issue Mr Johnson suggested the requested sign fits well with the setback and size of the lot Mr Johnson asked about landscaping plans Mr Caulfield said those plans have not been developed at this time, and noted that in the past, church members have done much of that work Mr Tomten moved approval, stnking conditions of approval No 4 and 17 regarding lighting, and adding a condition that the applicant provide a landscaping plan for review by the HPC Mr Peterson seconded the motion Mr Johnson suggested that the motion should indicate that the sign package was reviewed and accepted Mr Tomten and Mr Peterson accepted that as a friendly amendment to the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/01-42 Design review of an awning for McGarry -Kearney Agency and Marx Cafe at 243 S Main St Monica and Rob McGarry, applicants • City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 3, 2001 The applicant was not present Mr Johnson, seconded by Ms Diem, moved to continue this request due to questions about the awning and the status of a previously requested sign for Marx Cafe Motion passed unanimously Case No DR/01-43 Design review of extenor modifications for the former Gazette building at 102 S Second St Mark Balay, Balay Architects, representing the applicant Mr Balay said the modifications are part of renovating the building for occupancy of the second floor The request is to develop a garden space, with deck, behind the building The applicant also is requesting approval of forest green awnings on the front and back of the building, the front awning would replace an existing awning Mr Balay provided cuts of the proposed two wall lights and two 16 foot pole lamps No signage is being proposed at this time, he said Mr Tomten asked if the applicant would accept the condition that the fighting be 70 watt high pressure sodium bulbs, Mr Balay said that would be acceptable Mr Johnson asked about the existing fencing Mr Balay said the existing chain link fence would be removed and replaced with a hollow metal, black fence Mr Tomten moved approval as conditioned, approving the replacement of the existing fence with black, hollow metal fencing with final design and layout provided to staff for review, approving the two pole lights and two wall mounted fixtures utilizing 70 watt high pressure sodium lights, approving a 2x2 spindle railing design, approving the requested forest green awnings of a 1 1 pitch on the front and rear elevations, with the front awning to be placed in a location similar to the existing framing Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/01-44 Design review of signage for St Croix Vision located in the River Heights Plaza Christopher Leaf, Sign -A -Rama, representing the applicant Mr Leaf was present and bnefly described the signage — St Croix is centered above Vision Center, the lettenng is 10" and 18" inches in height and meets the allowable total space based on the business's linear front footage, and the signage is at the same height as the existing sign bands Mr Johnson, seconded by Ms Hark, moved approval of the signage as requested and installed Motion passed unammously Case No DR/01-45 Design review of signage for Firstar US Bank Loren Lorenzen, Universal Sign, representing the applicant The applicant was not present Mr Johnson noted that the existing numbers and square footage would not be changed in the request, except for replacing the existing 24-hour banking sign with Firstar US Bank, which would result in two signs at that elevation Mr Johnson moved approval City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 3, 2001 as submitted, with the condition that the existing 24-hour banking sign remain genenc in nature due to the number of signs at that elevation Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/01-46 Design review of roof top unit for WR Medical at 123 N Second St Jeanne Anderson, applicant The applicant was not present Mr Peterson noted that the unit would be visible from the Lowell Inn and Rivertown Commons, he asked about the color of the unit and color of the roof Mr Johnson noted there is no space on the ground for mechanicals Mr Eastwood moved approval as conditioned, Ms Diem seconded the motion Mr Tomten suggested adding a condition that the color of the unit match the roof and that the applicant submit the color and exact location of the unit for review by staff That was accepted as a friendly amendment to the motion, amended motion passed unanimously Case No DR/01-40 Design review of a canopy, signage and lighting for Belle Pogue, 125 S Main St This case was continued from the Nov 5 meeting Included in the packet was a summary of the result of conversations Mr Tomten had with the applicant since the November meeting, as well as a drawing of the awning revised as a result of Mr Tomten's work with the applicant Mr Tomten noted in his summary that the applicant was informed that the requested light fixtures had been denied, but if she wanted to pursue the matter, she should present the fixtures or good graphics of the fixtures at the December meeting Approval of the awning, as detailed in the drawing, and denial of the requested lighting, was entered into the record Other items • Review of repair to the building at 202 S Main St The building was damaged by a vehicle Correspondence from Cyrus Consulting with recommendations for repairs was included in the packet It was noted that all detail will remain the same, bnck will be matched as closely as possible, new windows will be aluminum frame with thermo-glass and aluminum frame will be tnmmed with matching wood tnm Mr Johnson moved approval of the proposed repairs, with the window framing to be matched as closely as possible and the glass to be clear Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously • Discussion of Temtonal Pnson plans • City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 3, 2001 Mr Russell introduced the development team from Shaw Lundquist, the firm the City selected to sell and develop the site through an RFP process Mr Russell noted that preservation of the existing building/site was one of the cntena for selection Jack Bucksell and Joe Musoff of Shaw Lundquist were present They presented some concept drawings for development that incorporate the existing warehouse building and as many as six new buildings The development would incorporate residential housing units, underground parking and retail/office space along the street Mr Johnson expressed a concern about the density of the proposed development and also a concern that the new buildings/underground parking might destroy the remains of the ongmal cell blocks Mr Johnson noted that areas three and five as shown in the preliminary plans would seem to be the most archeologically sensitive Mr Peterson said the HPC want the existing building preserved and kept on the National Register of Historic Places if possible He said he understands the need for additional buildings, as long as they fit the site He suggested that talking with Charlie Nelson of SHPO would be helpful He also stated he would like some kind of archeological survey done Mr Tomten said he liked the density of the proposal He also suggested that an archeological study be done, with the findings incorporated into the development plans • Review of Public Works building This was tabled from the November meeting as revised final plans were not available at that time Subsequent to the November meeting, HPC members received the final plans for review Wayne Branum of SALA Architects was present Mr Branum bnefly reviewed and provided samples of the proposed matenals He noted the salt shed is not part of this contract, but the intent is the shed will have the same siding matenals and shingles as the main building Works areas will be screened with windrows and lighting will be as minimal as possible The building sign will be gray galvanized metal, 13' long, and will be downhghted Mr Johnson noted that the HPC was not involved in the process until the project was well along, and said there was little action the HPC could meaningful contnbute Mr Russell pointed out the HPC was not part of the process until passage of the Public Works zoning ordinance Mr Russell noted that HPC approval is required Mr Tomten moved approval as conditioned, eliminating conditions No 2 and 7 Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously • City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission December 3, 2001 • There was a bnef discussion about the possibility of having HPC review of residential infill housing Mr Russell noted the Council might be receptive to that and said the issue would be a good work item Mr Peterson, seconded by Mr Eastwood, moved to adjourn at 9 35 p m , motion passed Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary • • H P C APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/01-42 Heritage Preservation Date December 3, 2001 and January 7, 2002 Project Location 243 South Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Mark Hanson Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of an awning Discussion The request is for design approval of an awning for the building at 243 South Main Street The building houses two businesses, the future Marx Cafe and McGarry -Kearney Agency The applicant will bring a revised drawing of the canopy to the meeting illustrating both the proposed canopy and signage The color of the awning will be determined by the time of the meeting Trim on the building will be painted dark brown or copper Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 Awning will not be lit 2 No additional signage 3 Structural elements of the awning shall be at least eight feet above the sidewalk 4 The awning valance shall be at least seven feet above the sidewalk 5 Fixed awnings shall have a minimum one by one pitch 6 Refer to City staff to work with applicant 7 Awnings can be over first floor windows with awning over apartment entry or awnings can be over first floor and second floor windows 8 Flower boxes approved for store front windows Findings The request meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Photo HPC Action on 12/3/2001 Continued HPC Action on 1/7/2002 +6-0 approval • McGarr -Kearney Rsency 651-435-6350 P 2 • • • Nov 26 01 12 55p 11/09/200, 14 52 C CITY OF STILLWI PAGE 02 Case No bit Dote Filed ? 1. O ! Receipt No Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in coenecdon with any application All supporting matenal (i.e. photos, sketches. etc ) submitted with applieatloa becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION `/ Address of Project , ?44` ) f 3 ?fj/� 1 i 5 es V Asssor's Parcel No.p24p A3� [7( 0 35— Zoning District C 1/ Descnpton of Project 1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct ! further certify ! will comply with the Winn lit is granted end used " ` —Maro Property Owns ` ` Reptese tabvc 1110 1 10 Martrssg Address.011 !, M ,in <;1 Maslmg Address 7_q-{II S, i�lia t n City State Zip �` ti 2 r�nn cS(_�K Csty State Zip 51114U Itt.6/ non c-c4'7— Telephone No ' Telephone No 041- 42i9 ' ' T7' Signature Revised September 16, 1998 Signature Nov 26 01 12 55p McGarr -Kearney RCency 651-439-6350 p 1 MCGARRY-KEARNEY AGENCY, INC 243 S MAIN STREET STILLWATER,MN 55082 (651)439-6345 Fax (651)439-6350 EMAIL Info acmcgarry-keameyagcncy com FAX MEMO 11 /26/2001 To CITY OF STILLWATER Attn SUE F Fax Number 430-8810 From Rob McGarry Re AWNING Number of pages (including cover page) 2 Comments SUE INCLUDED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM FOR YOUR FILE AS PER OUR CONVERSATIONS, WE HAVE NOT DECIDED ON FINAL AWNING PLAN FROM TWO PROPOSALS PLEASE ALSO NOTE TRIM ON BUILDING FRONT WILL BE PAINTED WE HAVE NOT DECIDED ON FINAL COLOR BUT I SUSPECT IT WILL BE DARK BROWN, OR COPPER IF YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL ME THANKS FOR YOUR HELP ROB MCGARRY • I t Page 1 of 1 • • • AWNING (612) 722 2731 $ Not to Scale - Facsi mil file //C \Documents and Setungs\SFitzgerald\Local Settmgs\Tempo \McGarryRendenng jp 11/20/2001 Page 1 of 1 • • • A her NINO (612) 722 2731 Not to Scale - Facsimil s file //C \Documents and Settmgs\SFitzgerald\Local Setlings\Tempo \McGarryRendenng jp 11/20/2001 H P C APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/02-01 Hentage Preservation Date Janurary 7, 2002 Project Location 221 East Myrtle Street Comprehensive Plan Distnct Central Business District Zoning Distnct CBD Applicant's Name James Mahnke Type of Application Design Review Project Descnption Design review of exterior signage Discussion The applicant is requesting design review of a six square foot projecting metal sign It will be non -illuminated and will be supported by a metal bracket The colors will be gray and white Iettenng on a black background I Conditions of Approval 1 The total area of the projecting sign may not exceed six square feet 2 The projecting sign shall be at least eight feet above the sidewalk and not be a hazard to pedestnans 3 If lit, it must be lit externally Light source must not be a safety issue for pedestrians and auto traffic 4 No additional signage 5 All exterior modifications to approved sign shall be reviewed and approved by HPC Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Photos • Nov 26 01 12 55p McGarr -Kearney Rgenc651-439-6350 11/09/2001 14 52 438r CITY OF STILLWATE PAGE 82 p 2 Case No .A'i` J o) - 4-7 Dote Prkd 21. 0/ Receipt No Fee. $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OP STILLWATER 216 NORTE FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant k responsibk for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting omatenal (Le. photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project , 1f3 Sf? y%f l) , , r Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Descnphon of Project 1 hereby state the foregoing statements and aN data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the perna? rf It Is grlented end used " jj —yf'n naNtcA - Property Ower ri P ttttl- I; E - Represcntabvo f Ll _ V� H 4 to Marling Address. 011 `) VAti.in 1 Mailing Address z 1 nib 1 n '- City State waQ rvnn < ! . Gny state z>p 5111(0/ nine) S`SOf — Telephone No Telephone No (C 61- 4 1 7i T7'1 Signatory Revised September 16, 1998 • Signature Nov 26 01 12 55p McGarr -Kearney Rgeneb 651-439-6350 p 1 MCGARRY-KEARNEY AGENCY, INC 243 S MAIN STREET STILLWATER,MN 55082 (651)439-6345 Fax (651)439-6350 EMAIL Info@mcgarry-keameyagcncy com FAX MEMO 11/26/2001 To CITY OF STILLWATER Attn SUE F Fax Number 430-8810 From Rob McGarry Re AWNING Number of pages (including cover page) 2 Comments SUE INCLUDED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM FOR YOUR FILE AS PER OUR CONVERSATIONS, WE HAVE NOT DECIDED ON FINAL AWNING PLAN FROM TWO PROPOSALS PLEASE ALSO NOTE TRIM ON BUILDING FRONT WILL BE PAINTED WE HAVE NOT DECIDED ON FINAL COLOR BUT I SUSPECT IT WILL BE DARK BROWN, OR COPPER IF YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL ME THANKS FOR YOUR HELP ROB MCGARRY • • • • H P C APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/02-01 Heritage Preservation Date Janurary 7, 2002 Project Location 221 East Myrtle Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name James Mahnke Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of exterior signage Discussion The applicant is requesting design review of a six square foot projecting metal sign It will be non -illuminated and will be supported by a metal bracket The colors will be gray and white lettering on a black background Conditions of Approval 1 The total area of the projecting sign may not exceed six square feet 2 The projecting sign shall be at least eight feet above the sidewalk and not be a hazard to pedestrians 3 Sign shall not be lit 4 No additional signage 5 All exterior modifications to approved sign shall be reviewed and approved by HPC 6 Sign will be located on wall west of front door Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Photos HPC Action 1/7/2002 +6-0 approval • • 11/20/2001 16 14 43088 CITY OF STILL""--R PAGE 02 Case No..I OZ -, Date Filed IZh °1 101 Receipt No 741-$ Fee ° $25.0( DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project & I £ a51- 5 (4 Q� Assessor's Parcel No , U D3%02M/QQC- Zomng District +Lai ^ -Descnption of Project, (iar� -Sron. OwAcsi�.o, a� i Ic I "I hereby state the foregoing statements end all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and ben ef, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if rt is granted and used " Property Owner= f UQ-5t IV L. oArfit5, LLC_ Representative . �a 15 -W(4. Mailing Address c? t ask ' V 4r-Nc Q- Mailing Address c I 1'Wr4.1a- City State Zip c 111,. cA , Jlo N 5 9)8 - City State Zip �l r / lti k/T -0-(' ) Telephone No A 51 - 35I ' do8y Signature )//f(it • Revised September 16 1998 Telephone No • file //C \Documents%20and%20Settings\Marketing ACCOUNTING\Local%20Settmgs\Te 12/3/2001 • Page 1 of 1 I 1 file //C \Documents%20and%20Settings\Marketing ACCOUNTING\Local%20Settmgs\Te 12/3/2001 • • / k 7 w dr { i 1 3 •' tr -i .7`4,t?1 �1 F... p3 A f ? ' erica's first f mil of esc1 • toy fu • Offering performance and protection to accredited investors -/ke. tAile roxo ri, x orf) Gee. vat .J;_ .sp-ja#4- 1/6k-{a - of, 0/ �� w� a ,5 • • • H P C APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/02-02 Heritage Preservation Date January 7, 2002 Project Location 270 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name John and Melissa Uppgren, representing Arcola Dev Co LLC Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of a building renovation Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval for the renovation of the "Mulberry Point Antiques' building The plan is to convert the building from retail/office space to office space for three tenants A new entry on the east side of the building is proposed to accommodate the fire code regulations for hallways and corridors (see Proposed Building Site Plan, page 12) The existing main entry will not be used as an entrance, the door will be replaced with windows The banners and the canopy will be removed from the front of the building All the windows in the building will be replaced with 2 7 x 2 6' energy efficient panes of glass Trim will be "brick" red to match the building There will be an expanded entry at the rear of the building (west elevation), and the addition of an ADA ramp Two floors will be constructed above the existing one story section of the west side of the building The mechanical units that are there now are not being used and will be removed The two story addition will be restrooms for each of the tenants The siding proposed to be for the facade of the addition would be corrugated metal, matching the color of the building The exterior brick on the building will be cleaned, and the masonry repaired Lighting will consist of a light in the ceiling at the new entrance of the building and a down lit security light at the rear door, the applicants will bring a detail of these lights to the meeting The only signage the applicants are proposing is the address would be on the east side of the building, and it would be backlit A detail and site location plan for the dumpster will be brought to the meeting The applicant will also address the parking at the meeting, they may need to apply for a Variance from the Planning Commission 4. • • Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 If lighting changes A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles 3 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 4 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project 5 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 6 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 7 All security lights on building shall be downlit 8 A sign permit is required for signage 9 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Presentation Booklet HPC Action on 1/7/2002 +6-0 approval • Case No Date Filed Receipt No 9 Fee $25 01 r&3o,,w //oort DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Z'710 I v MAN S ( Assessor's Parcel No G2/4ao/{oo T/ Zoning Distnct C �,� Descn tion of Project ReAk OVA Ovl am C Gam[ cf 6cQcLjAA sa —Pre aAeict ems- "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Arco ( Dev C.t0 Lit. Representative ‘301110‘ ( () tor Mailing Address I D 14S- Arm!Letivkiz Mailing Address City State Zip SH 11 Watf-Ar , M v C6a2Clty State Zip Telephone No G 5 I - 2 C- o' (, 2_ Telephone No • Si ature J signature Revised September 16 1998 • • • City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission ADDENDUM 270 North Main St. Project Arcola Development Company, LLC 10145 Arcola Lane N Stillwater MN 55082 Tel 651 275-0962 Fax 651 275-0617 January 7, 2001 • • • Minor Clarifications to Discussion: Discussion. "The plan is to convert the building from retail/office space to office space for three tenants " Clarification: The plan is to remodel the building and continue to use it for retail/office space We do not intend to restrict the use to either retail or office Discussion: "All windows in the building will be replaced with 2'7" x 2'6" energy efficient panes of glass " Clarification. The windows shown are based on an architectural detail sent to the glass manufacturers (see attached) The resulting windows will follow the dimensions closely, but until the shop drawings are complete, exact dimensions are not available Trim and sash sizes, based on our ability to anchor the windows, may slightly affect the final dimensions Our demolition plan includes the removal of some windows on the west and south walls, so most windows will be replaced, the rest will be removed and closed in • • • Minor Clarifications to Discussion: Discussion. "The exterior brick on the building will be cleaned, and the masonry repaired " Clarification: As necessary, some of the brick work is in excellent condition and requires no cleaning Other areas, notably the north side, require some attention / 3 • • Questions on conditions of Approval? 1) All utilities owned or controlled by the owner? 4) "sturdy solid masonry" material; Cement block not allowed? 5) "visible" by the general public? From sidewalk of building? • • • Revised Building Site Plan: 01 1° 11111311 1�III 11;ImHI ams 11 1111 OTTO 1 MULBERY STREET Site Plan Proposed changes • Expanded rear entry • Addition of ADA ramp and dock area • Addition of ADA parking •Surfacing and striping of ten (10) spaces (include one ADA) 5 3 g. 0 0 s c 0 A 4 a 3WVMj MOONIM O - 4 c 1 ■ I TA ki ° ° • • • Wall luminaires with shielded Tight sources Wall mounted luminaires for wall washing indirect or direct lighting effects for indoor or outdoor applications Housing One piece die cast aluminum supplied with universal mounting bracket for direct attachment to 31/2 or 4 octagonal wiring box Enclosure One piece die cast aluminum cover frame secured by captive socket head stainless steel screws threaded into stainless steel inserts Semi specular anodized aluminum internal reflector Stippled tempered clear glass Fully gasketed for weather tight operation using a molded silicone rubber 0 ring Electncal Lampholders Incandescent and H I D are medium base porcelain with nickel plated screw shell supplied with 200 C high temperature leads Incandescent rated 600V H I D rated 4KV Fluorescent are type GX23 (13W) G24d 3 (26W) rated 75W 250V Ballasts Compact fluorescent and H I D are magnetic HPF available in 120V or 277V specify Finish Standard finish is an eight step process consisting of two coats of black or white high solids UV stabilized polyurethane one with light texture over a phosphate base Custom colors supplied on special order U L listed suitable for wet locations io A C Lamp Wall mounted luminaires for direct or indirect illumination Anodized aluminum reflector Stippled tempered glass behind die cast aluminum louvers Any mounting orientation Color Black Lumen A B C 2477 Wall 1 100WA 19 1750 9 9 65/16 2447P Wall 2 13W PL 1720 9 9 65/,e 2478S Wall 1 35W E 17 HPS 2250 9 9 65/6 2457P Wall 2 26W PLC 3600 12% 12% 83/4 2479S Wall 1 70W E 17 HPS 6400 12% 12% 83/4 2479MH Wall 1 100W ED 17 MH 8500 125% 125 83/4 B A C Lamp Wall mounted luminaires provide an efficient wash of fight from a completely concealed light source Anodized aluminum reflector Stippled tempered glass with step baffle trim Downlighting only Color Black Lumen A B C 2480 Wall 1 100W A 19 1750 9 9 61/4 2482S Wall , 1 35W E 17 HPS 2250 9 9 6% 2483S Wall 1 50W E 17 HPS 4000 125/a 12% 85/8 2483MH Wall 1 70W ED 17 MH 5500 1244 12Va 85/8 Type BEGA Product # Project Voltage Color Options Modified BEGA/US 1000 BEGA Way Carpinteria CA 93013 [P] 805 684 0533 [F] 805 684 6682 4 iCopynght BEGANS 2000 updated 2/00 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Design Review Committee Application & Presentation 270 North Main St. Project Arcola Development Company LLC 10145 Arcola Lane N Stillwater MN 55082 Tel 651-275 0962 Fax 651-275 0617 December 28, 2001 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Design Review Committee Application & Presentation 270 North Main St. Project Arcola Development Company, LLC 10145 Arcola Lane N Stillwater MN 55082 Tel 651-275-0962 Fax 651-275-0617 December 28, 2001 1 i Proposed Project: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 270 North Main Street Owner/Builder Information: Current Owners: Diane & Bruce Rollie 11070 Mayfield Avenue N Stillwater, MN 55082 Contractor: Rick Vezina Braden Construction, Inc 1438 7th Street Houlton, WI 54082 New Owners: Arcola Development Co, LLC (under contract) John & Melissa Uppgren 10145 Arcola Lane N Stillwater, MN 55082 Brief Building History: to 1884 circ. 1888 1926 - circ. 1961 circ. 1972 Undeveloped with small stream cutting through the site Site of the St. Paul Hotel Expansion of the Foot Schulze & Company Factory (original building was on the site of Johnny's TV) Ringer -St. Croix Company (manufacturing) Lind Custom Shoe Company (manufacturing) 3 Project Description: • Main areas of work: Fire & Safety • Sprinkler head replacement • Riser and piping upgrade • Alarm system • Fire -rated stairwell exit • New electrical power & wiring ADA Access and Compliance • ADA Ramp entrance at rear of building • ADA compliant restrooms on each floor • New passenger elevator • ADA parking space Interior / Exterior Improvements • Additional entry on Main Street • New roof with insulation • New energy efficient windows • Upgraded entry • Upgraded parking area • Masonry repair and cleaning 4 Existing Building Elevations: East Elevation (Main Street) 1 I Existing Building Elevations: 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 East & North Elevation (Mulberry Street) Existing Building Elevations: West Elevation West and South Elevations Proposed Building Elevations: 0 ROOF 1 35' B' O LEVEL 3 +24,0' O LEVEL2 +12.0' O LEVEL 1 t0-0' I I I I I I I I 111111111111111111111111111111 I I I I I I I I 2 7 0 MAIN O BASEMENT 11 47 it BOILER ROOM 14 0 J O 1 EAST ELEVATION 4 1/8 = 1 - 0 ti East Elevation (from Main St ) Proposed changes: • Additional entry • Removal of existing door • Replacement of existing windows • New signage 8 Proposed Building Elevations: O ROOF +3S ff O LEVEL 3 +24-0' O LEVEL +12'-0' LEVEL L se-0' 0 O BASEMENT It-0' I I I I I 1 1 1 4ONORTH ELEVATION 1/8 = 1 - 0 ti North Elevation (from Mulberry St.) Proposed changes. • Replacement of existing windows 9 Proposed Building Elevations: 03 ROOF +35 9' i6 LEVEL 2 +24 d Q, LEVEL2 .17E [` LEVEL I zOO• • BASEMENT II IIIIIIIIIIIII 111111 11111U IIIIIIIIIIIII MOM • ■ ti WEST ELEVATION ti 1/8 = 1 - ONOTE FIRE ESCAPE NOT SHOWN West Elevation Proposed changes: • Expanded entry • Addition of ADA ramp • Replacement of existing windows • Addition of second and third floor restrooms 10 Proposed Building Elevations: • RCCE +35 Ar LEVEL 3 +24.0 O LEVEL2 +120 O LEVEL 1 =00 IWWI!IY YIIIIRInYlnnll YIYI11nlIIW mum / \ BASEMENT 110' 1- 1- 1- 1 0 0 2 0 SOUTH ELEVATION aO 1/8 = 1 - 0 ti South Elevation Proposed changes • Expansion of third floor restroom wall • Replacement of existing windows 11 Pro osed uilding Si e a NV1d 11IS 1®l 41: MULBER Y STREET Site Plan Proposed changes: • Expanded rear entry • Addition of ADA ramp and • dock area • Addition of ADA parking 12 1 1 Compliance with Design Guidelines 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Design Guideline Focus Proposed Design Comments Pedestrian -Oriented Design "buildings should be integrated with the streetscape ." Complies Additional entry on Main St provides additional storefront opportunities and improves pedestrian interaction Trademark Building Design Prohibited Complies Not applicable Setback Build in line with adjacent buildings Complies No footprint changes on main street Proportion Proportion should be sympathetic Complies No change in proportion proposed. Height Conform to average height of buildings on block Complies No height changes proposed. Roofs "edges should be related in size and proportion" Complies Consistent with both existing and adjoining buildings 1 13 1 1 Compliance with Design Guidelines 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Design Guideline Focus Proposed Design - Comments Parking "lots should be screened from street and sidewalk" Complies No changes. Vegetation exists to screen parking area from street. Rear Entrances "should be provided for buildings in order to develop double street frontages. " Complies New rear entry is friendly, ADA compliant and presents a "welcome appearance" through use of door and glass system Awnings "should complement the building, shape and color " Complies Awning will be removed consistent with the character of a factory building Utility Areas/Mechanical Equipment Screen exterior trash and storage areas Complies No change in present condition Mechanical units will be placed on roof out of view from street level. Detailing "should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding building" Complies Largely unchanged from current condition. Rear restroom walls will match the original siding materials of the elevator penthouse. 14 I Compliance with Design Guidelines 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Design Guideline Focus - Proposed , Design' _ Comments Facade Openings "size and proportion of windows and door openings should be similar" Complies No changes to existing window openings Doors will be upgraded to ADA and fire safety minimums Original character is maintained Windows "minimum of 60% of the street level Main Street facade shall be transparent" Complies Proposal improves on existing conditions by removing the blank effect of the frosted glass in the building. Additional entry further enhances pedestrian experience Blank Walls on Street Facade "shall be limited to prevent the disruption of existing patterns " Complies Blank walls not used in proposed project. Street -side materials to remain largely the same Materials Composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades Complies No changes to street side in regard to materials Rear walls for restrooms use brick -red corrugated steel consistent with adjacent materials and colors Some use of blank walls at additional entry and at bathroom addition is required by code 1 15 i Compliance with Design Guidelines 1 1 1 1 1 YDesign Guideline Focus Proposed Design Comments Color "should relate to adjacent buildings' colors to create a harmonious effect" Complies No changes to existing colors in use. Window frame color will be consistent with existing windows. Lighting "lighting fixtures should be concealed or integrated into the overall design of the project" Complies No significant changes to existing plan New concealed lights present over new entries on Main and at rear Main St building numbers to be rear illuminated Signage "relate all signs to their surroundings in terms of shape, color, texture " Complies Proposed signage is simple and consists of attached lettering and numbering at street level. Landscaping "shall be provided to enhance architectural features. " Complies No changes to existing condition, except for removing one tree at rear for ADA ramp Exterior Surfaces "should be a design feature of the building " Complies No changes except rear entry which requires concrete for ADA ramp. 16 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Design Review Committee Application & Presentation 270 North Main St. Project Arcola Development Company LLC 10145 Arcola Lane N Stillwater MN 55082 Tel 651 275-0962 Fax 651-275-0962 December 28, 2001 � Cityof5tillwater 1 Heritage Preservation Commission 1 i Application &Presentation i 270 North Main St. Project 1 1 1 1 1 i Design Review Committee Arcola Development Company, LLC 10145 Arcola Lane N Stillwater MN 55082 Tel 651-275-0962 Fax 651-275-0617 December 28, 2001 Owner/Builder Information: Current Owners: Contractor: Diane & Bruce Rollie 11070 Mayfield Avenue N Stillwater, MN 55082 Rick Vezina Braden Construction, Inc 1438 7th Street Houlton, WI 54082 New Owners: Arcola Development Co, LLC (under contract) John & Melissa Uppgren 10145Arcola Lane N Stillwater, MN 55082 Brief Building History: to 1884 circ. 1888 1926 - circ. 1961 \circ. 1972 Undeveloped with small stream cutting through the site Site of the St. Paul Hotel Expansion of the Foot Schulze & Company Factory (original building was on the site of Johnny's TV) Ringer -St. Croix Company (manufacturing) Lind Custom Shoe Company (manufacturing) 3 I Proposed Project: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 270 North Main Street Project Description: • Main areas of work: 1 Fire & Safety • Sprinkler head replacement • Riser and piping upgrade • Alarm system • Fire -rated stairwell exit • New electrical power & wiring ADA Access and Compliance • ADA Ramp entrance at rear of building • ADA compliant restrooms on each floor • New passenger elevator • ADA parking space Interior / Exterior Improvements • Additional entry on Main Street • New roof with insulation • New energy efficient windows • Upgraded entry • Upgraded parking area • Masonry repair and cleaning 4 1 1 Existing Building Elevations: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 East Elevation (Main Street) Proposed ;uikling Elevations: ROOF 13SB O LEVEL3 +2P-0' O LEVEL2 +120' LEVEL 1 -.0-0' MEEM ■®M■ 2 7 0 MAIN O BASEMENT 11-0' • BOILER ROOM 1!-0' J nitlnujY W IOnu.uuunumnHI nI O O 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/8 = 1 - 0 ti East Elevation (from Main St.) Proposed changes* • Additional entry • Removal of existing door • Replacement of existing windows • New signage 8 Proposed Building Elevations: O ROOF +36 O LEVEL 3 +24 d LEVEL 1 t0-0' • B0.SEMENT t 1 47 1111I 1111111 11 11 11 IIIII111111 11 11 11 1➢I nulnl 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 L r r- ti ti J O 4O WEST ELEVATION 1/8 = 1 - ONOTE FIRE ESCAPE NOT SHOWN West Elevation Proposed changes: • Expanded entry • Addition of ADA ramp • Replacement of existing Windows • Addition of second and third floor restrooms 10 Proposed Building Elevations: ROCF +3S-0 LEVEL 3 ♦24 0 idiot ■■■■ Num nil m 1111101 II III 1111 0 LEVEL +t2 LEVEL t _OO 0 BASEMENT 1t-0' 1 r 1- H 1- O O O (,Th SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8 = 1 - o ti South Elevation Proposed changes: • Expansion of third floor restroom wall • Replacement of existing windows 11 Proposed Building Site Plan: 1®1 •=pi MULBER Y STREET Site Plan Proposed changes. • Expanded rear entry • Addition ofADA ramp and • dock area • Addition of ADA parking 12 Compliance with Design Guidelines Design Guideline p Focus Proposed Design Comments _ Pedestrian -oriented Design "buildings should be integrated with the streetscape " Complies Additional entry on Main St. provides additional storefront opportunities and improves pedestrian interaction Trademark Building Design Prohibited Complies Not applicable. Setback Build in line with adjacent buildings Complies No footprint changes on main street Proportion Proportion should be sympathetic Complies No change in proportion proposed Height Conform to average height of buildings on block Complies No height changes proposed. Roofs "edges should be related in size and proportion" Complies Consistent with both existing and adjoining buildings 13 1 1 Compliance with Design Guidelines 1 1 if 1 1 1 1 1 1 Design Guideline Focus Proposed Design Comments Color "should relate to adjacent buildings' colors to create a harmonious effect" Complies No changes to existing colors in use. Window frame color will be consistent with existing windows. Lighting "lighting fixtures should be concealed or integrated into the overall design of the project" Complies No significant changes to existing plan New concealed lights present over new entries on Main and at rear Main St. building numbers to be rear illuminated Signage "relate all signs to their surroundings in terms of shape, color, texture. ." Complies Proposed signage is simple and consists of attached lettering and numbering at street level. Landscaping "shall be provided to enhance architectural features " Complies No changes to existing condition, except for removing one tree at rear for ADA ramp. Exterior Surfaces "should be a design feature of the building. " Complies No changes except rear entry which requires concrete for ADA ramp 1 16 1 1 Existing Building Elevations: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 East & North Elevation (Mulberry Street) Existing Building Elevations: West and South Elevations West Elevation Proposed Building Elevations: O ROOF +3S-9' O LEVEL 3 +24-0 O LEVEL2 +12d O LEVEL 1 s2d t MEM. MEMO IEEE ■■■■ ■MEIN O BASEMENT 11-0* I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O 4ONORTH ELEVATION 1/8 = 1 - 0 J North Elevation (from Mulberry St.) Proposed changes: • Replacement of existing windows 9 1 Compliance with Design Guidelines 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Design Guideline Focus Proposed Design Comments Parking "lots should be screened from street and sidewalk" Complies No changes Vegetation exists to screen parking area from street. Rear Entrances "should be provided for buildings in order to develop double street frontages " Complies New rear entry is friendly, ADA compliant and presents a "welcome appearance" through use of door and glass system Awnings "should complement the building, shape and color." Complies Awning will be removed consistent with the character of a factory building. Utility Areas/Mechanical Equipment Screen exterior trash and storage areas Complies No change in present condition Mechanical units will be placed on roof out of view from street level Detailing "should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding building" Complies Largely unchanged from current condition Rear restroom walls will match the original siding materials of the elevator penthouse. 1 14