Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-10-02 HPC Packet1 HE B I R I H P! A Of A NN (1 A Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, October 2, 2006 The City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission will meet on Monday October 2 2006 at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA 1 CALL TO ORDER 2 APPROVAL OF September 6, 2006 MINUTES 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS 4 NEW BUSINESS 5 DESIGN REVIEWS 5 01 CURVE CREST PROFESSIONAL BUILDING — CA ;E NO DR 06-38 Design review of a 234 4 x 6 6 monument sign lc ated at 2850 Curve Crest Blvd Kike Kuehn Welsh Construction Inc applicant Continued from September 6 2006 5 02 STILLWATER ART GUILD GALLARY — CASE NO DR/06-43 Design review of signage for Stillwater Art Guild Gallery located at 402 Main St So Randall Raduenz applicant 5 03 MYRON REUBENDALE - CASE NO DR/06-44 Design review of an accessory dwelling unit located at 609 Broadway Street South — Myron Reubendale applicant 5 04 CARETAKER'S HOUSE — CASE NO DR/06-45 Design review of exterior color located at 220 E Mulberry Street Dave Speedling 5 05 CURVE CREST PROFESSIONAL BUILDING — CASE NO DR 06-46 Design review of exterior channel letter sign located at 2850 Curve Crest Blvd Nordquist Sign Co applicant 5 06 HUNTINGTON LEARNING CENTER — CASE NO DR 06-47 Design review of signage for Huntington Learning Center located at 1250 Frontage Road Signart applicant 5 07 ANYTIME FITNESS — CASE NO DR/06-48 Design review of signage for Anytime Fitness located at 1270 Frontage Road Attracta Signs applicant 6 OTHER BUSINESS 7 ADJOURN 4 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 6 2006 Present Howard Lieberman Chairman Phil Eastwood Jeff Johnson Larry Nelson Roger Tomten and Scott Zahren Others Community Development Director Bill Turnblad and Planner Mike Pogge Absent Brent Peterson Mr Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Johnson seconded by Mr Tomten moved approval of the minutes of Aug 7 2006 Motion passed unanimously PUBLIC HEARINGS Greeder Demolition (Case No DEM/06-06) Demolition request for a garage at 521 S Fifth St Barbara Greeder applicant The applicant was present There was a brief review of the request Mr Lieberman opened the public hearing Ed Simonet co-owner of the property to the east of Ms Greeder s garage spoke in favor of the demolition request Don Empson 1206 N Second St told the Commission he had a statement from a mason that the garage can t be repaired Mr Empson also provided a written report included as part of Ms Greeder s supporting documentation on the history and significance of the garage No other comments were received and the hearing was closed Mr Lieberman reviewed the nine steps required by City Ordinance Mr Lieberman noted the one step not addressed in Ms Greeder s application was evidence that the structure had been offered for sale for possible reuse elsewhere However he suggested that considering the condition of the structure the Commission should be guided by common sense Mr Johnson pointed out that while some of the masonry of the garage is original and unique the roof and doors are not original The only part that is original is the masonry portion of the structure and that is in poor condition Mr Johnson noted that good documentation had been provided and the condition of the structure is such that it cannot be restored Mr Johnson moved to approve the demolition permit DEM/06-06 Mr Eastwood seconded the motion motion passed unanimously DESIGN REVIEWS Grumpy Steve s Sign Review (Case No DR/06-34) Design review of signage for Grumpy Steve s at 410 S Main St 402 Main Street LLC applicant J City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 6 2006 The applicant was not present Mr Tomten noted the applicant had done as requested by the Commission at the last meeting and moved approval as conditioned Mr Eastwood seconded the motion motion passed unanimously Weyer Sign Review (Case No DR/06-37) Design review of signage at 901 S Third St Mark Weyer applicant Mr Weyer was present He explained that since the original variance was granted by the Planning Commission in 2004 the building plans have changed somewhat so three office suites now have no access to windows or signage The proposal he said is to place signage of the same size where signs were previously located on the building Mr Johnson pointed out that the building use is primarily professional office use where recognition is based on the address of the building He noted that the windows by the entrance doors could be used to list tenants Mr Johnson also pointed out that the proposed plaque -type signage proposed would not be highly visible Mr Eastwood noted there has always been signage on this building and said he would be inclined to approve the request Mr Nelson agreed with the need for signage especially for those businesses off Main Street Mr Eastwood noted that the requested signage meets the allowable square footage of the ordinance Mr Johnson pointed out that the requested signage is not consistent with the RB District in which it is located Mr Johnson suggested that a projecting sign at the corner of the building could be used to identify the building by name or address with tenants listed in the side windows It was noted the Planning Commission would have to approve a variance for a projecting sign Mr Lieberman summarized discussion by suggesting that if the Planning Commission approves a variance the HPC would allow one sign basically identifying the building by name or address with tenants listed elsewhere Mr Johnson moved to deny without prejudice Case No DR/06-37 as not meeting the design requirements of the RB District Mr Lieberman seconded the motion motion passed unanimously Kuehn Sign Review (Case No DR/06-38) Design review of a monument sign at 2850 Curve Crest Blvd Mike Kuehn Welsh Construction Inc applicant The applicant was not present Mr Tomten asked if information had been provided regarding lettering style and color Mr Lieberman moved to table this case given the substantive questions about the request Mr Eastwood seconded the motion motion passed unanimously Ballantyne Sign Review (Case No DR/06-39) Design review of a pylon sign at 14430 N 60th St Schad Tracy Signs Rick Ballantyne applicant The applicant was not present Mr Eastwood pointed out that the Commission had approved the requested sign previously but the applicant had never followed through on the issue Mr Eastwood also pointed out that every business in the area from Osgood to Greeley has two 2 J City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 6 2006 signs There was discussion of the HPC s previous action Mr Johnson said he recalled that the HPC approved either the monument or wall signage not both Mr Eastwood moved to approve Case No DR/06-39 Mr Lieberman pointed out that the HPC would be approving something that is in violation of the City s ordinance Mr Eastwood s motion died for lack of a second Mr Johnson moved to approve the design of the pylon sign as conditioned with the additional condition that the existing wall sign be removed allowing one sign and as conditioned Mr Zahren seconded the motion Motion passed 5-1 with Mr Eastwood voting no Hunninghake Design Review (Case No DR/06-40) Design review to replace the rear porch on an existing foundation and add an 8-foot deck at 209 N Third St Tom Hunninghake applicant The applicant was present Noting that this proposal would be an expansion of a non- conforming use and require a variance from the Planning Commission Mr Lieberman questioned whether this was a chicken -or -the -egg situation Mr Turnblad responded that he believes the variance will be granted as this is an existing non -conforming house and the expansion placed over an existing foundation Mr Johnson stated this house demonstrates the success of the City s demolition ordinance and is a fine example of what the ordinance is intended to accomplish He stated the request is not an exorbitant expansion but he noted the HPC can t grant a variance Mr Johnson asked the applicant whether it would be acceptable to shorten the addition by two feet in order to be within the footprint of the existing structure Mr Hunninghake said he would like design approval of the larger and smaller addition should he decide to pursue obtaining a variance During the design review Mr Tomten asked if the siding on the south elevation would be kept noting that the transition from the existing structure to the addition is important Mr Hunninghake said the siding would be kept he also stated the roof pitch of the addition would be the same Mr Johnson asked if corner boards frieze board and window trim would be carried through Mr Johnson also spoke of utilizing the corner boards to separate the addition The I d his 1 details In 1A! I a bl g c nr1 I I le applicant cnp a111eU is plans 1111 111 ueiano v v inuovvS vv 111 be double -hung oasis wi uovvs Mr Johnson moved approval as submitted which will require a variance and approval if shortened by two feet as conditioned with the additional condition that window trim corner board and frieze board be carried through to the addition and that the addition be separated by the corner board Mr Eastwood seconded the motion Mr Lieberman noted the motion represents HPC approval of design for the extended or shortened version of the plans and offers no opinion regarding the variance Mr Lieberman also stated this is an excellent project and example of why the demolition ordinance is in place Motion to approve as conditioned passed unanimously Cesare Design Review (Case No DR/06-41) Design review of exterior siding at 102 S Second St Richard Lay applicant The applicant was present Mr Lay explained the existing siding is in need of replacement and the request is to utilize a metal siding to provide a different look for the business a look that is not overly industrial Mr Lay also noted that at 350 square feet the impact of the new siding will 3 J City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 6 2006 be minimal Mr Nelson said he liked the proposed metal siding saying it was more fashionable and appropriate to the use as a wine bar Mr Johnson expressed a concern that metal is more reminiscent of a shed versus a building of permanence Mr Eastwood said he does not like steel siding in the Downtown District Mr Nelson and Mr Zahren both spoke in favor of the proposal Mr Tomten suggested the new material will clean up that elevation of the building Mr Tomten noted this structure was always an add -on not a Victorian building and never part of the Gazette building Mr Johnson asked about the color of the siding Mr Lay said the proposal is to use galvanized metal Mr Johnson asked about light fixtures Mr Lay said the fixtures will remain the same Mr Tomten moved approval as submitted and conditioned with the additional conditions that the trellis be unpainted cedar and that the metal be unpainted galvanized metal Mr Lay stated he was hoping it might be possible to use a clear Plexiglas over the trellis to provide some weather protection as the umbrellas will be removed from the deck Mr Eastwood questioned whether Plexiglas would be acceptable Mr Pogge stated that if the HPC finds the use of Plexiglas to be acceptable it will have to meet building codes Mr Lay wondered if a retractable canopy might be acceptable if the Plexiglass won t work Mr Johnson pointed out that louvered boards offer some weather protection and there is no problem with snow load Mr Johnson verified that there will be no change in signage Mr Zahren seconded Mr Tomten s motion Motion passed 4-2 with Mr Eastwood and Mr Johnson voting no OTHER BUSINESS Water Street Inn patio There was a brief review of previous actions on the matter Mr Johnson asked about the 60-day rule when action is tabled Mr Turnblad stated that the 60-day rule does not apply to design review Mr Lieberman noted that none of the conditions of approval have ever been completed or complied with and moved to deny the request that was originally tabled Mr Eastwood seconded the motion motion passed unanimously Heirloom Housing Program funding Mr Turnblad said he has not yet heard from SHPO regarding grant money for an intern to begin implementation of the program and the item will be brought back to the HPC next month Mr Eastwood suggested soliciting volunteers Mr Turnblad said he would pursue that avenue should grant money not be available Heritage Preservation Awards Members submitted a number of suggestions for consideration After discussion it was agreed this years awards should be presented for the renovation/restoration of the carnage house at the Teddy Bear Park and the garage on the Bremer property on Nelson Alley a rescue -rehabilitation award for the Hunninghake project 209 N Third Street a Neighborhood Conservation District award for the project at 515 N Everett and an award for signage to Aprille Shower s Tea Room St Michael s Church Sign Mr Pogge told the Commission that St Michael s Church has requested that lighting on all four sides of their new sign be allowed as lighting the top and bottom only as approved by the HPC has resulted in the creation of shadows Mr Johnson seconded by Mr Eastwood moved to approve the use of four sided halo lighting on the new 4 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 6 2006 sign with the condition that the fixtures/light source cannot be seen from the sidewalks or street Motion passed unanimously Lay Request Richard Lay told the Commission the Terra Springs Homeowners Association has asked that the air conditioning units for the wine shop located in Terra Springs building 1 be relocated to the roof top Mr Lay said such a move likely would require larger units and there might not be enough space on the roof Mr Lieberman said he would not be in favor of moving any mechanicals to the rooftop Mr Johnson noted rooftop units would create more noise and also stated the units were placed in their existing location by design so as not to be visible from the street or any common spaces Mr Johnson seconded by Mr Eastwood moved to not allow the wine shop s mechanical units to be moved to the roof Motion passed unanimously Mr Johnson seconded by Mr Eastwood moved to adjourn at 9 20 p m Respectfully submitted Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 5 /J I( BIATHP A Of MNFOI Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 25, 2006 APPLICANT Mike Kuehn - Welsh Construction LLC REQUEST Design Review of freestanding (monument) signage for Curve Crest Professional Building CASE NO DR/06-38 LOCATION 2850 Curve Crest Blvd COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT RDP - Research & Development ZONING CRD - Campus Research & Development HPC DATE October 2, 2006 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a proposed 6 foot 6 mch tall by 13 foot 4 inch wide monument style freestanding sign The material for the monument sign will match the exitmg building The applicant has verbally indicated to staff that the sign will not be lit The West Business Park design standards and the zoning ordinance allow for one free standing sign up to 100 square feet is size The total sign area of the proposed sign is 8016 square feet, which is smaller than the square footage allowed by the ordinance The current sign ordinance allows for one sign per busmess per site There are several tenants currently in the building, however, Keller Williams Realty is the only tenant with signage which is in the form a wall sign Staff would recommend as a condition of the design review permit that mdividual tenants be limited to either a wall sign or listing on the monument sign but not both without a variance to the sign code RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned J 4 2850 Curve Crest Blvd Page 2 ACTION BY THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION The Heritage Preservation Commission first reviewed this sign request at their September 6, 2006 meeting At that meet the Commission tabled action of the sign since the apphcatron did not include information related to the lettering, style, and color of the sign The applicant will be providmg this information to the Commission at your October 2, 2006 meeting CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 Signage for tenants shall be limited to either a wall sign or a hstmg on the monument sign but not both without a variance 3 The sign shall not be lit 4 No additional signage FINDINGS The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines The proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance Attachments Applicant s Form, Elevation Drawing/Photo 1 Case No Dk. Ito-3% Date Filed '4' Receipt No Fee: $25.d DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (0 e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project2850 Curve Crest Blvd Assessor's Parcel No 3103020430015 Zoning Distract BP-C Description of Project in detail New 13' -4" long x 6' -6" high monument sign Materials to match building 'I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if rt is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner curve Crest Professional Representative Mike Kuehn - WelcL CSJrout,av) LLG Building, LLC Mailing Address35o St Peter St . Ste 200Mailing Address7807 Creekridge Circle City State Zip st Paul, MN 55101 City State Zip Minneapolis, MN 55439 Telephone No {�A(651) 287-8894 Telephone N�o� (952) 897-7844 Signature �Y `� Signature 1`� -t_ \ r_-. C \DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\DWARD\DESKTOP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD rebnuary 5 2003 06611, — OUTLOT A PART=LEL ocuumgi \BASER 510616 NB9 01355E 49146 wjtvLortri's 110Hu To C1 -„0 SUN Hai rnvel g Q TkAks Clay" STATE HIGHWAY NTT 560- Ad o. loge. 3A6 SITE PLAN r >Q O DESCRIPTION LOT 1 BLOCK J BRADSHAW ADDITION, Wa5Fnglon County M me1ola NO 36 SITE DATA TOTAL AREA D3616 SF GREEN AIM A. X 306 40f34 SF FEOD 48b45 SF PRD.nDED 36% BU3D3G DATA BLDG A 2 STORY BLDG 8 1510RT FUTURE 14)36 SF / FLOOR 7554 5F GROSS 110C 5F GROSS 513E TOTAL 36)4 5F GROSS 1@mC FECUI BITS 351I1:00 3624 5F BC CARS PARCCG RE/TURF-0 36)4 5F / NB CAW OR 41)6I000 TOTAL FRLST PHASE BLDG A 7554 SF / 116 CARS OR 4061000 GENESIS A WELSH COMPANY 7807 C eekndge C cle Mrnneapolls MN 55439 952 897 7874 Fax 952 897 7740 PROJECT CURVE CREST PROFESSIONAL BUILDING CURVE CREST BLVD STILLWATER, MN SHEET ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN I WREST CER TFT TINT THUS RAN SFECFICATILK OR REPORT WAS PREPARED Br 1E OR IAOER TIE OR I+IDER MT DIRECT 511PER✓L91CN AND taAT I AM A DULY LICENSED AFCJIITECT 6IDER 131E LAUB OF TIE STATE CF M36ESOTA. LT1N D SLOAT AIA DATE 011007 REG. NO N163 ISSUE / RENSICN DATE ISSUE FOR PERM 0L407 ISSUE FOR CQSTRICTICN O1A07 RE UN JOB 26020540 DRAUN B NCH CHECKED BT LDS A-1 Co 01 1 3 CONCRETE CAP - TOP VIEW AI i2 I0 13 4' 1 Southill Dental Great Lakes Oral Surgery Keller Williams New Tenant Valley Orthodontics GSA Web Financial New Tenant 2850 CURVE CREST 13 4 L MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION / I2 I 0 1 1 J PRECAST CONCRETE CAP 8" CMU WITH 4 FACE BRICK EACH SIDE MATCH EXISTING BUILDING COLOR ROLLOCK ACCENT BRICK TYP CUT BRICK AND SLUSH SOLID AS REQUIRED -12 CMU WITH 4 TECHTURE STONE EACH SIDE MATCH BUILDING COLOR FIELD VERIFY GRADE AT HEIGHTS AT SIGN LOCAT ION 12 8 8 CMU FOUNDATION WALL AND CONCRETE FOOTING TYP 1 8" Co PRECAST CONCRETE CAP 8" CMU WITH 4' FACE BRICK EACH SIDE MATCH EXISTING BUILDING COLOR / / ROL LOCK ACCENT BRICK TYP CUT BRICK AND SLUSH SOLID AS REQUIRED 12 CMU WITH 4 TECHTURE STONE EACH SIDE MATCH BUILDING COLOR FIELD VERIFY GRADE AT HEIGHTS AT SIGN LOCATION 12' 4 8 CMU FOUNDATION WALL AND CONCRETE FOOTING TYP 2 MONUMENT SIGN SECTION AI i2 I GENESIS 7807 Creekridge Ctrcle Mznneapolts MN 55439 A WELSH COMPANY 952 897 7874 Fax 952 897 7740 MONUMENT SIGN CURVE CREST PROFESSIONAL BUILDING STILLWATER MN SCALE JOB REVISION REV l REV 2 AS NOTED 2006 120 0 DATE 05 16 06 m8-01-06 DRAWN BY CMS DATE 08 01 06 A-1 1400 Frontage Road W Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 The walls sign be reduced to a maximum combined area of 20 square feet or secure a variance from the Planning Commmssion to allow the sign area to exceed the allowable square footage If the sign is reduced in size the new sign design shall be reviewed by City Staff before installation 2 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 3 No additional signage FINDINGS By either reducing the sign area to 20 square feet or less or securing a variance the proposed sign will meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance The proposal meets the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual attachments Applicant's Form Applicant's Letter Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM Case No 1Df' Date Filed Receipt No Fee: $25.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project f D?-70 f4-/AU sessor's Parcel No 0 d3O2l3 068,6 (Required) Zoning District C �7 Description of Project in detail w/5 �e r2e--,0 Z-6105 6. ) /4- / (2 /5- )C 12 - (V,<7 w 5 FA/C_ / "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct, I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner . 4 - i9ti`/ f/ /f1 Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone No Signature (Required) Representative 9<� �Ge 0/1/2- Mailing Address /-Z_ 7 7 it/ r G)'V 77(---C(',. City State Zip ->`lr G G� , • 5->10°IZ Telephone No CP5i d'?5 - / 3 7 2- G-41-/-442,, Sl `,Ll`3 0 ( 5 kz-e - Signatur H \mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit wpd February 5 2003 gtY1-7g/ -V/YA4 ham . /- ' 5 ser f?/ Jig_L ea /1/ WPI,Y -V 6 -%I-V -1 c) fi frfV- 7r7-i97 ,S v 77O2 S /_____Ln'02e/ s/ ?--a-7/d /V/ (V / c71 -7,;' / s Q`rVJ(7 >i1 -pfQ1-"7 5-7vG1_27V-,,7/LPIa 3/e, /5 -74(9 42.2fi// 9- zf1)/ / J #7 -7/1/,49---7> Jf = ZZ (Vr') 9 --xo £7- %� J-e,/1 0kj4-OutL-i,TN (go ' Col.-Prt- Or Oct 1L0/NL .,1 IF SIR 11 P t A I OF M I N N F ti 0 1 A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 22, 2006 CASE NO DR/06-43 APPLICANT Randall Raduenz REQUEST Design Review of proposed signage for Stillwater Art Guild Gallery LOCATION 317 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT CC - Community Commercial ZONING CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE October 2, 2006 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner /1/1/f r DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 317 Main St S This site is within the Isaac Staples Building The sign is proposed to contain the business name "Stillwater Art Guild Gallery" 'Stillwater' is proposed to be in gold lettering and 'Art Guild Gallery' will be royal blue Additionally an abstract image of a red paint palette is proposed The sign will be mounted on a cream yellow board The sign is proposed to be 15 feet along A majority of the sign will only be 1 foot wide, however, the center of the sign widens to 3 feet wide The total proposed sign measures a total of 23 8 square feet in area For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD ' may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face ' The applicant's retail space is 20 feet long facing Main St S The total sign area of the proposed sign is 23 8 square feet which is larger than allowed under the zoning ordinance T Stillwater 8 RTHPL A E 0; I N N F 1 U t a Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 25, 2006 CASE NO DR/06-44 REQUEST Design Review Permit for home addition (Attached Garage) APPLICANT Myron Reubendale LAND OWNER Myron and Phyllis Reubendale LOCATION 609 Broadway St S HPC MEETING DATE October 2, 2006 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner BACKGROUND Myron Reubendale has applied for design review approval for a garage addition to his home at 609 Broadway St S Mr Reubendale would like to add a garage with living on the second floor on the north side of the existing structure Mr Reubendale states in his letter the design of the garage will maintain the aesthetics of the home by incorporating matching windows, maintaining the same siding, roof pitch and incorporating glass panels in the top panels of the garage door The side of the garage incorporates 5 matching windows and the rear will have a triple window upstairs and a suitable door at ground level EVALUATION OF REQUEST A design review permit is required for construction of the addition because the Reubendale property lies within the downtown plan district (See Exhibit A) Reubendale Design Review September 26 2006 Page 2 Specifically, the City Code1 states that a design review permit is required for types of projects in the downtown district that include "any exterior remodeling that could clearly alter the architectural integrity of [a] structure, residential or commercial" The proposed addition could have the potential to alter the architectural integrity of the home So, staff referred the project to the HPC for review Review standards to be used for this specific project are somewhat ambiguous First, even though the project is to be reviewed against the downtown design manual, the manual was developed with commercial buildings in mind Consequently, there is little or no guidance there for the proposed residential addition Second, the home is located within the Neighborhood Conservation District (See Exhibit B), however, the standards set out in the Neighborhood Conservation District guide inhll project and not additions to existing homes Staff has prepared the Design Review Checklist from the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines and has included it in the packet (See Exhibit C) Many of the design guidelines set out for the Neighborhood Conservation District have been met including making the garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house The Zoning Ordinance offers additional guidance The character of the architecture is to be kept in mind when reviewing proposed exterior changes2 Judging by current condition of the house and the restoration efforts under taken by Mr Reubendale, it is apparent that he is sensitive to the architectural character of his residential structure In keeping with the work already completed, it is the owner's intention to construct the addition with materials that match as closely as possible the restored materials on the existing house Additionally, the location of the home and the topography of the rear yard constructing a detach garage in the rear yard of the property is impractical It should be noted that during the review of the application it was noticed that the proposed addition is only 5 feet from the side (north) lot line The minimum required side setback for a garage with living space above is 10 feet 3 Since the proposed addition is within the required side yard setback Mr Reubendale has two alternatives The first would be to shrink the addition and keep the footprint 10 feet from the side lot line The second would be to make application to the Planning Comrrussion for a variance from the required 10 foot side lot line setback If the variance is granted, then the footprint of the house can be expanded ' Zoning Ordinance Chapter 31-1 Subd 30 (3) C 2 x 2 Zoning Ordinance Chapter 31-1 Subd 30 (3) f 2 in 3 Zonmg Ordinance Chapter 31-1 Subd 12 (5) a 6 and Chapter 31-1 Subd 12 (5) b 2 Reubendale Design Review September 26 2006 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Heritage Preservation Commission discuss the architectural details of the proposed improvements and decide upon one of the three alternatives below The conditions attached to the approval alternatives can be modified or expanded upon by the commission if desired ALTERNATIVES A Approval If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposed addition and deck to be satisfactory, it could recommend approval with the following conditions 1 Unless the Planning Commission grants a side yard setback variance for the house, the footprint of the proposed addition must be revised to be no closer than 10 feet to the side (north) property tine 2 All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator 3 The windows in the addition shall be double hung sash windows 4 The addition shall incorporate similar siding and roof pitch of the existing structure 5 A drainage plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit B Table If the Heritage Preservation Commission believes that more information is necessary to approve the design review permit, it could continue the review until the next meeting C Denial If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposed addition to be inconsistent with the architectural character of the residential structure, it could recommend denial With a denial, the basis of the action should be given attachments Site Plan Applicant's Letter Building elevations Pictures of existing building elevations Design Review Checklist (Completed by Staff) cc Myron Reubendale Reubendale Design Review September 26 2006 Page 4 Reubendale Design Review September 26 2006 Page 5 RB RB • MRC PRO RB RB RB PRO PRO P110 RCM Sr CROIX RIVER TUP PRO i PRO PRO -"" CIS...: E TT WATER ST R8 RO —RB RB ir. RCH j L MAN } .i . SECOr0 R8 PA R8 FOURTH PA FFTH kk.. iit11ti ST It .iE. ST ST 4313E bui S1ir. qiY R8 ST II ACM R8 RB -MR ® CenUal Business District OMNI MI (� Wblc Admwe4atbn Office ® Trersoortatbn Mies, Peidre f-1 Parks. Reaeatbn. Open Space n Low Density Residential cY Medium Density Residential F9gh Density Residential uRc Marina, Recreation PRO TUP EON" mippli 11111111 II RI M IB IB IA PA - IB- RIB PA Altu 6 Riad RB V 1) STILLWATER DOWNTOWN PLAN Proposed Land Use Mill M I l Ot NI( H e?' r, ra, (1• Stillwater Conservation District Map 4C / r OAK HILL cr N �r wade NVI�p 1gLL/¢P nwaP�!p y�p�`�LOIIN � cr IYE LAR 1, Nr , RAN, Srt • 12 T OAK Lily vustiivic aspseL u 1- y f POPLA CT i thimmentsri MEM Ink EINSPIMEN WEL Fr4:06E III i MEM sr, num OTTER CIR to HNC 0 o J u NDER N S7 11E04 ORLEANS 11 AL Ir- Stillwater Conservation District \\\ pc. t�Eg-T Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines C tiC Kress (T c" Design Review Application and Checklist This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form Contact Stillwater City Planning Office 651 430 8821 City Hall 216 N 4'h St Stillwater, MN 55082 www a stillwater mn us Project Address .rCw S Apphcant name, address, telephone' 1 Neighborhood Architectural Styles ecVernacular ❑ Itahanate ❑ Queen Anne u Gothic ❑ Greek Revival ❑ Second Empire ❑ Amencan Foursquare ❑ Stick ❑ Other 2 Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback (Guidelines #1, #2, #3) Prevaihng setback on block (est) Z- 7 Average setback on block (est) Z ? house setback Z 7 3 Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1, 1-1/2, or2 stones high? (Gwdehnes #4, #5) Stones House on nght House on left House to rear hf Prevailing on block Prevailing opposite block Proposed new house 1 1-1/2 2 ❑ ❑ .ate ❑ ❑ e— ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ •tom ❑ o a-"" ❑ o 4 Prevailing Front Porch pattern m your neighborhood (Guideline #13) Front Porch House on nght .ate House on left House to rear N/i4- ❑ Prevailing on block Prevailmg opposite block of Proposed new house None 0 ®n Notes Tb rat )t%�/ LG�rrdti f /f p`yr e 5 Prevailing Garage Location pattern in • your neighborhood (Guidelines #10, #11) Front Rear Side Garage Garage Garage House on nght ❑ ❑ 0 pJDNE' House on left .-ate ❑ ❑ House to rear /4/44. ❑ o ❑ Prevailmg on block ❑ o o Prevailmg opposite block o ❑ 0 Proposed new house ,[ir ❑ ❑ Nail', 6.. bed agbir. A.:x of mew, es 6 Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood (Guidelines #10, #11) 1 stall 2 stall 3 stall Garage Garage Garage House on nght ❑ ❑ ❑ AtaAl House on left ❑ .ate ❑ House to rear Ae A— ❑ 0 0 Prevailing on block ❑ ❑ Prevailing opposite block / ❑ Proposed new house ❑ N ❑ 7 Is the proposed garage compatible m form and detail with the design character of the main Ouse? (Guideline #14) %4...e '. 'pertP , a 8 If the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighb rhood and streetscape? Stillwater Conservation District (p1of2) Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist 9 Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property? (Guidehnes #6, #7, #8) Structure sited parallel to slope ❑ Building deigned to reduce cut and fill (minimized retaining walls) ❑ Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes /1/p G i' s vvj o f poi 11 ¢ e 10 Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? (Gmdehne #9) ❑ Types of trees /^� ❑ Heights JDTec •.� ❑ Trunk diam Notes Good Neighbor Considerations 1 Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunlight m adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) f ` House to right 0 L House to left /M'�+ PV w 0 4.4'*CT House to rear N / Notes How will you nuttgate any negative sunlight impacts on neighbors? ❑ Locate structure on lot to minimize impact ❑ Adjust building height, or portions of building, to minimize impact ❑ Other Stillwater Conservation District 2 Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines #22, #23) House to right itiO House to left per f ,, tv /v,I' House to rear 1r Notes How will you mitigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? o Offset/locate windows to reduce impact ❑ Use obscure glass in window o Locate balconies to minimize impact A/ jib --- ❑ Use landscaping elements for screening ❑ Other 3 How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors?(Guideline #25) ❑ Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property o Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property ❑ Other To be mcluded with this Apphcation and Checklist ❑ Site Plan include location of proposed building(s) on property lot area indicate impervious surface property lines street/ sidewalk location and approximate location of adjacent structures Indicate proposed outdoor deck/patio and landscaping features ❑ Building Plan dimensions, first floor area square footage ❑ Building Elevations indicate building height windows matenals and color on all elevations Indicate proposed exterior lighting O Photographs of site and streetscape O Regular Planning Department Development Application Form Design Guidelines (p 2 of 2) Case No Date Filed Receipt No //./Z(L, Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting maternal (i e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following information is reauired PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project L201 S &u-'Aq Assessor's Parcel NoZt--OR60 Zoning District! Description of Project in detail Gitt_a-&t- ‘Oktt,t rt0 L) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner \ ►roti ZEAAE_NtorLE Representative Mailing Address (,aq S Mailing Address City State Zip S-.Lw r tz_) tii SSoW D City State Zip Telephone No Cc5l IS 3 l S ` Telephone No zi Fl Signature Signature C \DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\DWARD\DESKTOP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD February 5 2003 September 19 2006 The design of our garage maintains the aesthetics of the home by incorporating matching windows maintaining the same siding roof pitch and incorporating glass panels in the top panels of the garage door The side of the garage incorporates 5 matching windows and the rear will have a triple window upstairs and a suitable door at ground level The front set -back of 2 sets the garage apart from the rest of the house & will allow for appropriate drainage from the rooflines I believe that the completed project as proposed will provide an addition that not only belongs but will appear to have been there from the beginning Thank You Myron Reubendale 609 S Broadway Stillwater, MN 55082 (651) 253-8152c (651) 430-9184h Wre5-1- Tr • { D'-o( ,?r7%`u F192 I ?:-QVP4-- �4zl�' "7� �- Vj F r-C-4 riJ7,Ji GkJ F � Ft - P C) I704 k-- V �✓ V r4"5( 142 Ft4- t-I r\fiFi-- V E+/Lt / >< I/4A. I ` O' W ► I �!'S sir✓pa h'(n O - > Y. D r AI—jr V Ffl (F4r? (J P_.,z. ‘J E i I\J I /4, `,v,, rr- 1 L 1 ►e- /4TIOkroU- WE Fc�VC}vrJ / r 2— P`2f Sf31 t✓(1 t-F�� 4 Lr t FA-pE, - 1 r.E 4/4" Tic, rL- LL N o Ly tei7D2-rrw s� VPROryf- 1 5/8' 9'+D Fla ' - \\� (U� r, f v tZr rYF-CL1r' NIgN F1.Oa11— '/f -R FAY COED (VAPOR-- P r�{�_' 11litt'T3~, O (L/ b L TT 1 pei, ter or ofT V tp i N6u L..! q/i5" r - �; e � -417 / r �vrU� ry to nor- 1_-MAaOF- *Dt T2' tOw�1)�, 4-A-LI►y !0 )1 "0 G 7P!tT I *6c1l ory V tz- P r14 Et - rly'Alyo or\ t 0 6-7tl(6.cg 06) 11 1/bra I Lop 1-0 of (it)of 44° 1 •,inmunilc Ik•velmmnk•nt I)rn.irhncni Case No. DR106-44 Site Map N 1 inch = 40 feet 411 'water I E B 1 P H P 1 A [ O F M I N N f ti O I 4 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 21, 2006 CASE NO DR/06-45 APPLICANT Greg Johnson REQUEST Design Review of exterior building colors for the Mills on Main Care Takers House LOCATION 220 Mulberry St E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT CC - Community Commercial ZONING CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE October 2, 2006 PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner mid DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review approval of the exterior building colors for the care takers home at the Stillwater Mills on Main Project The colors proposed for the building are a shady willow (medium gray) with accents of Nesting Dove (off white) and Red Bluff (dirty red) The proposed colors are similar to other single-family homes in the Downtown Historic District RECOMMENDATION Approve as conditioned CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission FINDINGS The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines The proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance Attachments Applicant's Form, Elevation Drawing, Color Samples Telephone No DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Receipt No Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION c� Address of Project 220 fl2►Z''T ( S�sessor's Parcel aZZ o20 /,341 %0 t� quir Zoning District CE✓ Description of Project in detail }-�7--� �' T i�_ ���; r G1 r'-1iLL5 "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my know/edge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner�12 S� arL �.►�G Representative ��c— Sr E-a_ i CA, l-1 r I p -)oj &4 Mailing Address 3Sb Si- Pr-- sT cl-k. Z7® Mailing Address City State Zip S P '-' ` r- 5-S-'‘Q2 City State Zip 61Z 1 q61 cA--S‘ Telephone No Signatur- — Signatur quired) H \mcnamara\sheila\2005\design revi'w permit wpd February 5 2003 September 20, 2006 Michel Pogge City of Stillwater 216 N 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Letter of Intent Exterior Painting of the Caretaker's House Stillwater Mills on Main Dear Mr Pogge, As previously submitted, the paint colors and corresponding copies of the elevations for the Caretaker's House are hereby submitted by Four Star Land Development for review and approval by the City of Stillwater At your convenience, would you please provide the estimated schedule that the City of Stillwater would follow in reviewing and approving the proposed colors to make sure that representatives from Four Star would be available at any required meetings I am best contacted via my cell phone at 612-229-3329 or email at greglohnson@usa com GGU 1 IVlULDr/MC 1 STILLWATER, MINNES RED Qc,•-ter' B c. ;3- e� "r1 -r G"✓` w REMOVE EXG METAL ROOFING RESHEATN W/ 1/2" CDX PLYWD 30" ROOFING FELTS ASPHALT SHINGLES TYP PREFINISHED DRIP EDGE SCUPPER AT ALL EXISTING WDWS PROVIDE NEW CLAD TRIM PACK REPLACEMENT WDWS ALL NEW WDWS TO BE CLAD DBL HUNG UNITS TO MATCH SAME SIZE AS TYP 2ND FL UNITS ..-t.". L7-, -- AT SIDING INFILL CONDITIONS TO MATCH EXTG LAP AND EXPOSURE ALL SIDING AND TRIM 70 BE PREP'ED PRIMED AND TWO COATES PAINTED NEW CONC STAIRS AND STOOP NEW RAILING GC TO FIELD VERIFY GRADE 4 " OF RISERS PRIOR TO INSTALL SOUT- ELEVATION TO.W I ;1182 NEW LANDSCAPING TOF 1109 T01U TAP L'1 1 1J lEll i�C 7-14c) i •-•-+ 7'12,rr1 NEW FOUNDATION WALL WITH ROCKFACE VENEER AT EXPOSED CONDITIONS (COUNTY MATERIALS 10-080 PREM CREME) TOLL 1152 CONTRACTOR OPTION NE SPLIT FACE ROCKFACE RETAINING WALLS OR STACKED ROCKFACE VENEER (COUNTY MATERI 10-080 PREM CREME) CONCRETE APRON TO ASPHALT FIRE LANE / LANDSCAPING ON NORTH 4 SOUTH SIDE OF CONC APRON TOF 1019 1/4" = 1' - 0" -r-rx, 1-1 u U u u u U u u L" u U u U u uLI u v 1 7T ELEVATION 4 L 9 -0" x '1 -0" e 9 -0" X 8 -0" INSULATED GARAGE DOORS -------------- 1 DOWN' RE BY MIL [L— SEE CIVIL FOR BOLLARD LOCATIONS L I' - 0" IE BIRTH t o Of M I N N f S O I A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 25, 2006 CASE NO DR/06-46 APPLICANT Nordquist Sign Company, Inc REQUEST Design Review of building (wall) signage for Curve Crest Professional Building LOCATION 2850 Curve Crest Blvd COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT RDP - Research & Development ZONING CRD - Campus Research & Development HPC DATE October 2, 2006 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a wall sign The sign will contain 2 lines of text listing the name of the building "Curve Crest Professional Building" The first line will measure 1 foot by 10 feet 4 inches and the second line will measure 10 inches by 13 feet-6 5 inches The total area of the proposed sign is 21 6 square feet The sign's lettering will be non -lit white aluminum letters For wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance The sign ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line' This building is 160 feet wide facing Curve Crest Road The total sign area of the proposed sign is 21 6 square feet, which is smaller than the square footage allowed by the ordinance RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned LODU l...urve l rest Diva Page 2 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 Signage for tenants shall be limited to either a wall sign or a listing on the monument sign but not both without a variance 3 No additional signage FINDINGS The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines The proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance attachments Applicant's Form Elevation Drawing/Photo 209/18/2006 MON 10.32 FAX 651 287 8889 MSP METRO DEVELOPMENT Z001/001 ® r ' Sep 15 2006 2 01PM No 4333 P 2 Case No: Date Filed. Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55032 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (I e photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following Information is reaulred PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project o 50 grre & 4 3IVI Assessor's Parcel No. 31030Zo9300/S ✓Zoning District ''DescrIptIon of Project In detail "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit If It Is granted and used" If representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature Is required /��"� p r 1, ', 'Property Owner1ir�i f'Csl PrO1S�Dj1Al 6�ll f p r ntative 5rti1 ti' I1eJut1 Flailing Address3 O Sli- Fah Sfi 4Z00, MailingAddress SS&D SF P '11 u1 i'o amity State Zip " WI MA SStDZ Clty State zip t yakiMN 5�I b2 "Telephone . 1 •7- ; ;; S Telephone No, ( I —Z5 7—g88 -"Signature !'_. Signature C \bOCU NTS AND SETTI . WgRD ESKTDP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD February 5 2003 Sign Art Co 2933 Mondovi Road Eau Claire WI 54701 (715)834 5127 800 235 5178 Fax (715) 834 0489 2170 Dodd Road Mendota Heights MN 55120 (612)688 0563 800 699 0563 Fax (612) 688 2081 www signartusa com ROJECINAME HUNTINGTON LEARNING CENTER ADDRESS STILLWATER MN DESCRIPTION Sk RACEWAY MOUNTED INTERNALLY , ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS & LOGO PANEL . SALESEP E.. " fir' � w � p 4N-yi ``='ems A.0R SRECS RETORrtNSb& '�RIMiCAPWrTOM _ ATCHk-P�VIS 35t7 -x('�'1, I�TrE '"L `°�M'"',-�, s's cs' ,,7*4a- 'v' ,*t-vc, W' x ' i�:, i .Lr�,,.. T_' - N4 i 1NHI E ACRYLIC ACES �w/ 3Mt #2,3O. a2265 EMERALD;G ''t..`-`3-c b` z, YTRANSLUCENTA/ INYL ©VER1 AY ,V�INYLTO REIN LIN 'ALLOW FORTHEMIHITEBORDEfZ fi.ca.ve ' ,z'l h%..��^�..�� f 4 .., Esc y - �• - .1 �-, z..J ti ti��1i, s...`" k. �. °'"was ': CUTAWAY ASSEMBLY DETAIL TYPICAL FA ESLIT RACEWAY MOUNTED CHANNEL LEI>'TER NEON TRANSFORMER ON A FABRICATE GADVONIZED RACEWAY c afyx Ja yue 87�2 �v el ED'TO -' a-" tea' " " ' ary -r .., This drawing is the property of SITE PLAN NOT TO SCALE Nordquist Nordquist Sign Company Inc 312 West Lake Street Minneapolis MN 55408 PH 612 823 7291 FX 612 824 6211 www nordquistsign com All design manufactur ng reproduct on use and sale of Ih s document s str ctly prohibitied without the written consent of Nordquist Sign Company Inc This document is submitted under a conf dential understanding that the recipient of this document assumes custody and agrees that the document and any part of its content is not to be cop ed reproduced in whole or part or any of its contents be evealed n whole or part to othe parties except fo wh ch it is agreed upon by Nordquist S gn Company Inc and recip ent nor shall any design featu es unique to this document be incorporated in any other projects SALES GS DESIGN BJ DATE 06 12 06 CHK D REV 1 REV 2 REV 3 REV 4 REV 5 REV 6 REV 7 REV 8 REV 9 08 18 06 HM/CH CURVE CREST 2850 CURVE CREST STILLWATER MN MSP COMMERCIAL STANDARD FINISH AND FIT SIGN TYPE CHANNEL LETTERS IDENTIFICATION APPROVAL PRODUCTION READY REF CURVE CREST MSP JOB 23237-2 PAGE 1 3 r This drawing is the property of 063' ALUMINUM RETURN 1' X 1/8" ALUMINUM ANGLE CLIPS 1/4 20 NUT ZERT AND THREADED ROD MOUNTED INTO SILICONE FILLED HOLES EFIS W/ PLYWOOD BACKER SECTION 1.. i t t t t t < tNA t i ws SCALE 3" = 11-0" Nordquist Nordquist Sign Company Inc 312 West Lake Street Minneapolis MN 55408 Phl 612 823 7291 FX 612 824 6211 www nordquistsign com All des gn manufactu g rep oduction use and sale of this document s strictly prohibitted without the written consent of Nordquist Sign Company Inc This document is submitted under a confident al understanding that the recipient of th s document assumes custody and agrees that the document and any part of its content s not to be cop ed reproduced in whole or part or any of its contents be revealed in whole o part to other parties except for which it is agreed upon by Nordqu st Sign Company Inc and recipient nor shall any design features unique to this document be ncorporated n any other p oiects SALES GS DESIGN Bl DATE 06 12 06 CHK D REV 1 REV 2 REV 3 REV 4 REV 5 REV 6 REV 7 REV 8 REV 9 08 18 06 HM/CH CURVE CREST 2850 CURVE CREST STILLWATER MN MSP COMMERCIAL STANDARD FINISH AND FIT SIGN TYPE CHANNEL LETTERS IDENTIFICATION APPROVAL PRODUCTION READY REF CURVE CREST MSP JOB 23237-2 PAGE 1 2 TORL[ 952.837.3 CO W W CO 0 Y W ifoo Cie W W OC Lel 71. W T W Len CO 0 W W CURVE CREST CGI: PHOTO OVERLAY 257" (21'-5") SURVEYED 166-1/2" 123-7/8" NOT TO SCALE EXTERIOR S/F NON -ILLUMINATED FABRICATED REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS LETTERS - FABRICATED ALUMINUM WITH 2" RETURNS - PAINTED WHITE MP N202 - FONT: GILL SANS MT AND GILL SANS MT BOLD INSTALL: - STUD MOUNT INTO SILICONE FILLED HOLES SURVEY COMPLETED 08.17.06 JA, ADDED PRODUCTION DRAWINGS CURVE CREST PROFESSIONAL BUILDING' < CENTER LETTERS WITHIN BAND ELEVATION: CENTER LETTERS WITHIN BAND 1.1 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" This drawing is the property of: Nordquist Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. 312 West Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 55408 PH 612.823.7291 FX 612.824.6211 www.nordquistsign.com All design, manufacturing, reproduction, use and sale of this document is strictly prohibitied without the written consent of Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. This document is submitted under a confidential understanding that the recipient of this document assumes custody and agrees that the document and any part of its content is not to be copied, reproduced in whole or part, or any of its contents be revealed in whole or part to other parties except for which it is agreed upon by Nordquist Sign Company. Inc. and recipient, nor shall any design features unique to this document be incorporated in any other projects. SALES: GS DESIGN: BJ DATE: 06.12.06 CHK'D: REV 1: REV 2: REV 3: REV 4: REV 5: REV 6: REV 7: REV 8: REV 9: 08.18.06 HM/CH CURVE CREST 2850 CURVE CREST STILLWATER, MN MSP COMMERCIAL STANDARD FINISH AND FIT SIGN TYPE: CHANNEL LETTERS IDENTIFICATION APPROVAL• PRODUCTION -READY REF: CURVE CREST MSP JOB: 23237-2 PAGE: 1.1 F 1 8 I P T 11 P A f 0 MINNT OIA Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 19, 2006 CASE NO DR/06-47 APPLICANT Signart Co , Inc REQUEST Design Review of proposed signage for Huntington Learning Center LOCATION 1360 Frontage Road W COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT BPC - Business Park Commercial ZONING BP-C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE October 2, 2006 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner if�r DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 1360 Frontage Road W This site is a bay withm the Valley Ridge center and is proposed to be occupied by Huntington Learnung Center The signage plan for the Valley Ridge center allows for a maximum of 40 square feet for this bay The total sign area of the proposed signs is 39 33 square feet and meets the approved sign criteria The colors for the sign will be green with white trim RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage FINDINGS The proposal meets the intent of the Valley Ridge Center sign plan and the West Business Park Design Guidelines attachments Applicant's Form, Elevation Drawing and Photo DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM Case No PR Date Filed Receipt No Fee: $25.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (t e photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Augliz S$E l34O Assessor's Parcel No (Required) Zoning District AP-C Description of Project in detail IOS-iAti.. ti) sza va-r lEriev. rStems Z. Atribrat4547 Piet '7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner Tt; EINtg IMEs4-146315 Mailing Address 535T GistivisLEM sgE IUl City State Zip 5T WUIS ARY- „MiS 5541Z, Telephone No 65-Ln- t? Signature ��v� ��. (Required) Representative 'i.c-risi-Tzr-G� , LJ Mailing Address Z177 D77>t t - City State Zip I .i i s I--6T, 7, Ia.•u.1...G5iZO Telephone No L51-68 -o ' Signature H \mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit wpd February 5, 2003 (Required) J if III 8 I R H P l A 0( M I N N f 4 0 1 A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE September 19, 2006 CASE NO DR/06-48 APPLICANT Attracta Sign REQUEST Design Review of proposed signage for Anytime Fitness LOCATION 1270 Frontage Road W COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT BPC - Business Park Commercial ZONING BP-C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE October 2, 2006 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner Kin DISCUSSION The apphcant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 1270 Frontage Road W This site is a bay within the Valley Ridge center and is proposed to be occupied by Anytime Fitness This bay was previously occupied by Boomtown The signage plan for the Valley Ridge center allows for a maximum of 80 square feet for this bay The bay is being spht for Anytime Fitness and the owner of the Center would like to divide the signage between the two spaces The total sign area of the proposed signs is 40 square feet and is exactly half of the allowed sign area The colors for the sign will be white and black lettering with a red logo RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage FINDINGS The proposal meets the intent of the Valley Ridge Center sign plan and the West Business Park Design Guidelines attachments Applicant s Form, Elevation Drawing and Photo Case No: Date Filed. Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Z"�0 �6lariAdY�� Address of Project � W sor's Parceln) No Zoning Distnct Descnption of Project in detail AN i 1 Irvia cat' Q SS "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is Property Owner TRuC OATH I N J eS % Representative Alaa-tt- s)) Mailing Address 7 (2 C v�' f Gti-t Fading Address 14 (off l- eS City State Zip E P i ate �3 City State Zip 2CS-P1 i ti 3/4 Telephone No TSpp -14-3 -3 -2i� '1`j Telephone No - - - • Signature M c2W1 Signature C \DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS \DWARD\DESKTOP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD Feb 56" 14' #3630-115 INTENSE MAGENTA VINYL OVERLAY ON LOGO 3' X14' = 42 SQ FT UlU_T I IIUIC rI11UC» 10'-10" 19" 56" 15" 1 TOP VIEW INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LETTER WITH PLEXIGLAS FACE 1. WHITE PLEX WITH BLACK VINYL OVERLAYS MAGENTA LOGO 2.1" GOLD TRIM CAP 3..060 METAL RETURNS - BLACK 4.15MM WHITE NEON TUBE 5. NEON TUBE SUPPORT 6..090 ALUMINUM LETTER BACKS 7.60 MA 2161 COMPLIANT TRANSFORMER 8. GTO WIRE 9. BUILDING FACIA 10. ALUMINUM RACEWAY PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING 11. UL APPROVED GLASS HOUSING ANYTIME FITNESS 1270 WEST FRONTAGE ROAD STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55052 FRED KOCH 715-536-0500 THIS ORIGINAL DRAWING BY ATTRACTA SIGN CO. IS NOT 1 7-25-00 JR TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED WITHOUT' THE CONSENT OF ATTRACTA SIGN. I 1/2=1' DATE DRAWN BY SALESPERSON JR TTRACTA low 14680 JAMES ROAD ROGERS, MINNESOTA 55374 763-428-6377 - 763-428-9097 FAX N F 9 I R T N P l A 0 11 I N N f ti 0 1 A CITY COUNCIL DATE ITEM CC DATE PREPARED BY September 12, 2006 12th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards October 3, 2006 Michel Pogge, City Planner /i �j° The Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission has selected the following individuals and businesses to receive one of their annual preservation awards These awards are given on the basis that the project reflects the finest examples of carrying out the spent and intent of the Histonc Distnct Design Guidelines or the Conservation Distnct Design Guidelines Mayor Jay Kimble and HPC Chairperson, Howard Lieberman will present each recipient with a plaque at the October 3, 2006 Council Meeting STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESENTS TOM AND SHERRY ARMSTRONG TEDDY BEAR PARK BARN 207 NELSON ST EAST FOR THE FINEST PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES RENOVATION OF A BUILDING OCTOBER 2006 STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESENTS STEVE BREMER FORMER JOSEPH WOLF BREWERY BUILDING 239 NELSON ST EAST FOR THE FINEST PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES RENOVATION OF A BUILDING OCTOBER 2006 STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESENTS THOMAS F HUNINGHAKE 209 THIRD ST N FOR THE FINEST PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES RESIDENTIAL RESCUE AND RESTORATION OCTOBER 2006 STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESENTS JOHN AND KIM BRACH 911 SIXTH AVE S FOR THE FINEST PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE CONSERVATION DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES RESIDENTIAL RENOVATION OCTOBER 2006 STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESENTS APRILLE'S SHOWERS TEA ROOM 120 MAIN STREET NORTH FOR THE FINEST PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES SIGNAGE OCTOBER 2006