HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-05-01 HPC PacketTHE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
Notice of Meeting
The City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission will meet on Monday, May 1,
2006, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street
AGENDA
Approval of the March 6, 2006 minutes OlirS to Heel L
Public Hearings
1 Case No DEM/06-02 Consideration of a request from Croix Capital Group for
the demolition of a residence located at 7143 Manning Avenue North in the PA,
Public Administration District Croix Capital Group, applicant Ap/"-.`Pd w(ic. %
aid/ 'fia oaf
Design Reviews
2 Case No DR/06-17 Design review of parking lot and a 25' x 50' deck located at
101 3rd Street South (American Legion Post #48) in the CBD, Central Business
District David Swanson, representing the American Legion Post #48 Continued
from the April meeting 11-in,aeel w( 1-4,/
3 Case No DR/06-19 Design review of a olanned unit development for a 45,0u0
square foot mixed use retail, office and res.dc; tial use with underground parking
complex in the Central Business District located at 227 North Main Street in the
CBD, Central Business District Mainstream -Development Pam nershTp; LLC,
applicant C9 -& 1 (
4 Case No DR/06-20 Design review of proposed construction for a free-standing
grape arbor on second floor deck of Northern Vineyards Winery located at 223
North Main street in the CBD, Central Business District Robin Partch, applicant
c „u.e' w/ Cam +-- —� G/�-.- rea, - ®1 lot d
5 Case No DR/06-21 Design review of proposed signage for Stillwater Medical
Clinic located at 1500 Curve Crest Blvd in the BP -I, Business Park Industrial
District Dan Ginkel, applicant ,rrd wl ,.6 ,A-- -1,, Ge#ve_.A S�r
Other Items
6 Mills on Main continued discussion
0-- /s
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET • STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082
PHONE 651 430 8800 • WEBSITE wwwci stillwatermn us
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
April 3 2006
Present Howard Lieberman chairman Phil Eastwood Jeff Johnson Larry Nelson Brent
Peterson Roger Tomten Scott Zahren and Council Representative Ken Harycki
Others Community Development Director Bill Turnblad
Mr Lieberman called the meeting to order at 6 58 p m and welcomed new Community
Development Director Bill Turnblad
Approval of minutes Mr Johnson asked about his wntten comments regarding Case No
DR/06-13 While not read into the record, Mr Lieberman said the points raised by Mr Johnson
were covered in the discussion The minutes of March 6 2006 were approved as submitted
Design Review
Case No DR/06-15 Design review of signage change at 106 E Chestnut St in the CBD
Central Business District Patricia Page applicant
Present was Darrell Rhodes owner of the building Mr Rhodes said the spelling of the building
name will be corrected The lettering will be burgundy with gold trim The sign background will
be white Mr Rhodes also requested that he be allowed to continue the use of a backlit sign
saying he bought the building with the sign the way it is — backlighted Mr Lieberman said he
would strongly request that the applicant use lighting other than backlighting and also suggested
that the use of backlighting is not a grandfathered use since the building ownership has
changed Mr Rhodes asked about other backlit signs in the downtown area Mr Johnson
agreed that with the change in building ownership the use of backlighting is not a
gramdfathered use Mr Johnson also suggested that the use of the building — professional
office space — does not provide the rational for allowing backlighted signage Mr Rhodes
argued that the residential appearance of the building makes it difficult to determine the use of
the building the sign contractor also pointed out that it will be costly to change the signage
Mr Johnson moved to approve the layout of the proposed sign as submitted with the condition
that the signage not be internally lighted and that if the applicant wishes to have the sign
externally lighted a lighting plan be submitted to the HPC for approval Mr Zahren seconded
the motion Mr Tomten pointed out that backlighting is not conducive to the Victorian theme of
the building and surface lighting is a better approach Mr Lieberman also noted the downtown
design guidelines were in place when Mr Rhodes assumed ownership of the building and also
pointed out that the HPC cannot grant variances Mr Johnson's motion passed unanimously
Case No DR/06-12 Continued Infill Design Review in the Neighborhood Conservation District
(RB Two Family Residential District) at 1208 N William St Tom Mulcahy applicant
The applicant was not present
Mr Johnson reiterated his written comments submitted for the March meeting the belt line for
the single unit is higher than normal and is most apparent from the side elevation more vertical
elements such as more height to the first floor windows should be added to the twin home and
the proposed coach lights on the front of the units should be replaced with shielded or downlit
fixtures Mr Johnson also pointed out that the window shown in the plans for the duplex unit
1
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
April 3 2006
does not fit with the floor plan as shown Mr Johnson suggested that the window not be
eliminated but replaced with a pair of windows Mr Harycki said during the March public
hearing many neighbors expressed concern about drainage issues and wondered whether the
Infill guidelines call for drainage issues to be addressed Mr Turnblad pointed out drainage
issues will be addressed as part of the resubdivision permit process
Two neighbors were present Joann Loer 1114 N William and Jeff Benson 1120 N William
Both reiterated a concern about drainage issues Mr Benson also reiterated a concern about
the proximity of the driveway to existing utility meters
There was a question as to whether to table the case again due to the applicant s absence Due
to the 60-day review rule it was decided to act on the case Mr Johnson moved to approve
plans for both structures as conditioned with the additional conditions that the belt line for the
single unit be lowered to match the floor elevation or eave line that the second -story window in
the duplex unit that conflicts with the floor plan be replaced with two separate sash windows
that the 5x5 picture window be replaced with a double sash window that the coach lights be
replaced with shielded/recessed fixtures that vertical elements be added to the duplex unit and
that the engineer review the drainage plan and proximity of the driveway to existing utility
meters Mr Peterson seconded the motion motion passed unanimously
Case No DR/06-17 Design review of parking lot and 25 x 50 deck at 101 Third St S
(American Legion Post 48) in the CBD Central Business District David Swanson representing
American Legion Post 48
Present were Dave Swanson Curt Newcomb and Post 48 Commander Robert Hart Mr
Newcomb explained that rather than a deck as initially proposed plans now call for an elevated
patio with block retaining wall Mr Newcomb noted the Legion had purchased the parking lot
behind their building which they plan to surface with pavers Mr Newcomb addressed some of
the staff comments He said there are plans to screen the access along Myrtle Street
Regarding the comments about color palette he said they are looking at different tones with the
paver blocks and believe the patio and paver colors can be brought together Lighting will not be
intrusive he said Ambient lighting is all that is proposed the existing street light will be the
primary light source he said The patio he said would provide space for a few tables with
umbrellas there will be no outside bar
Mr Johnson asked is there would be a walkway from the patio to the front of the main structure
Mr Newcomb said the only access to the patio would be from the inside of the main building or
the parking lot Mr Johnson also asked about plans for the patio railing and how it would be
attached Mr Newcomb noted that the railing will have to meet code and will likely be painted
treated lumber or perhaps wrought iron Mr Newcomb said they plan to do some screening of
the railing such as with flower planters The railing Mr Newcomb said will be attached to the
concrete slab patio Mr Newcomb also stated the Legion would like to complete the patio this
summer in asking for concept approval of the plans
Mr Johnson moved to approve the plans for the modular block retaining wall and concrete slab
patio with details regarding the railing lighting landscaping and paver/block materials to be
submitted for final review Mr Turnblad asked that a condition be added to provide a site plan
2
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
April 3 2006
for access points which Mr Johnson added to his motion Mr Eastwood seconded the motion
motion passed unanimously
Case No DR/06-18 Design review to replace an existing entry door at 102 S Second St
(Gazette Building) in the CBD Central Business District John Harvey Harvey Woodruff LLC
applicant
John Harvey was present Mr Harvey explained his request to replace the existing door with an
anodized aluminum door In addition to safety issues he said the existing door is very heavy
and does not close properly The transom would stay, he said He said he is requesting to use
metal because of the cost involved also he said metal weathers better
Mr Tomten asked Mr Harvey if he had looked at maintaining the profile of a wood -width door
Mr Harvey said that too would require a custom-made door and he suggested the door is not
that visible to passers-by Mr Johnson and Mr Nelson spoke in favor of the use of wood as
being more historically correct Mr Johnson suggested that the existing door might be rehinged
to address the safety issue Mr Harvey reiterated that it would cost $3 000 to install a new metal
door versus $10 000 for a new wooden door Mr Eastwood asked if Mr Harvey would consider
using a wooden door if it is determined it is economically feasible Mr Harvey responded that he
would not consider that option Mr Harvey former owner of the Bourdaghs Building also stated
he took exception to several comments made during the discussion of Case No DR/06-15 Mr
Harvey s position was duly noted for the record
Mr Lieberman pointed out that the use of colored anodized aluminum is acceptable according
to the downtown design guidelines Mr Eastwood seconded by Mr Peterson moved to
approve the plans to replace the building door with a bronze anodized aluminum door as
submitted Motion passed unanimously
Other items
Stillwater Mills on Main — Dave May Four Star Land Development was present Mr May
acknowledged the concern regarding the roof vents as discussed at the last meeting He said
the plumbing stacks can all be cut off 10-12 above the roof membrane when completed He
noted the rubber boot of the roof extends 9-10 to accommodate major rain events so the
plumbing vents when cut will extend only 2-3 above the boot He said all the skylights furnace
vents and other roof vents were identified in the original drawings submitted to the City and said
the developer is not asking for more then identified in those drawings Mr May also noted the
developer was not given the opportunity to ventilate out the sides of the building with the
exception of the air conditioning units And he said the HPC s directive was to have no
mechanicals on the roof
Mr Harycki noted that the vents are visible not just from Second Street but can be seen from
areas of the South Hill as well Mr Harycki said Council Members have been receiving many
calls of concern about this issue and he said screening/shrubbery as proposed in a letter from
Mr May is not enough to mitigate the concerns Mr May reiterated his statement that plumbing
vents will not be the issue as they can be cut off The problem Mr May said is with the exhaust
vents for fireplaces dryers and bathrooms which must be 48' above the roof deck and 36 from
3
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
April 3 2006
fresh air returns Mr May said they are looking at a process of painting almost all of the vents to
match the roof surface
Mr Lieberman said he could not recall what the HPC originally approved and asked if it would
make sense to hold a workshop on just this issue and at that workshop have all past records
available so the Commission knows if fact what was approved Mr Harycki said the public
wants to know what is going to be done about this issue
Mr Johnson suggested that to quell some of the concern the developer cut the plumbing vents
short and paint them as soon as possible and see what comments are received — change the
situation and show what might work he suggested Mr Zahren asked about installing some
type of screening over the entire roof Mr May said that creates a problem with roof point Toads
and ventilation issues Mr May said he would like to do as Mr Johnson suggested cut the
public vents and paint and see what input is received
Brian Larson 2008 Hazel Court offered comments He said given the geography of the area
the roof should have been the design starting point the primary design element He suggested
that either the developer knew what the roof would look like and felt it would be acceptable or
had no idea of what it would look like Mr Larson also stated that the City should ask for more
than landscaping and paint and he noted that the more time that goes by the more expensive
any solution will be for the developer Mr Larson called for the developer to offer a real
significant compromise and reduce the number of stacks by consolidating the stacks or some
venting through the sides of units Mr May pointed out that 2/3 of the building is dry walled and
said he wasn t sure if the vents can be consolidated at this point Mr Larson asked that the
developer investigate the possibility of consolidating/reducing vents to determine if it is feasible
Mr Harycki noted this issue will be a Council Request Item at the April 4 Council meeting to let
the public know what s going on The public needs input, he said Mr Eastwood wondered if this
issue had moved past the HPC and become more of a Council issue Mr Lieberman said the
HPC has an obligation to push forward If an impasse is reached then the matter goes to the
Council he said And Mr Lieberman again said the HPC needs to see the record pertaining to
the issue
Mr Lieberman suggested holding a joint workshop with the Council and have the developer
present three different concrete alternatives with cost options for mitigating the venting Mr
Turnblad was asked to provide a record of the past actions for the Commission Mr May said he
was not sure if he could get definitive costs should the workshop be scheduled within two weeks
as was mentioned It was agreed that the developer could proceed with
cutting/painting/removing bags from a portion of the roof
Mr Tomten pointed out that the Commission and others should not forget the height allowance
If the developer had been allowed to step the building up along Second Street the structure
could have been 35' higher than the existing building Maybe the Commission paid too much
attention to the view of the structure from Main Street he said but he pointed out that folks still
have a view of the River from Pioneer Park, which is better than no view at all
4
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
April 3 2006
Regarding scheduling a joint workshop it was decided that if the Council is amenable to such a
joint meeting the HPC will be available Mr Lieberman moved to refer the decision regarding
the workshop to the Council and await its recommendation with the issue to be on the HPC s
May agenda for further discussion Mr Eastwood seconded the motion motion passed
unanimously
Mr Eastwood seconded by Mr Johnson moved to adjourn at 9 p m
Respectfully submitted
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary
5
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
April 19, 2006
Present Howard Lieberman, Chairman, Jeff Johnson, Phil Eastwood and Scott Zahren
Others Bob Lockyear and Bob May, representing Mills on Main
The meeting was convened at 6 p m at the Stillwater City Hall
The Chair moved the meeting to the "Mills on Main" location for color review Mr May
explained his color choices on the roof vents and then went on to explain the proposed
choices on the garage entry doors on the Mulberry Street side of the building He then
explained the color choices for the various facades between the brick work After much
discussion the four members present offered suggestions as to the final colors however
there were no decisions made on color choice
Mr May indicated that he will provide an updated set of colors choices in line with the
suggestions of the Heritage Preservation Commission at their May 1, 2006 meeting
The meeting was adjourned at 7 10 PM
Respectfully submitted
Bob Lockyear
Memorandum
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
To Hentage Preservation Commission
From Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
Date Apnl 27, 2006
Re
Stillwater Medical Group Clinic
Sign Permit Design Review
Case DR/06-21
BACKGROUND
The Stillwater Medical Group Clinic at 1500 Curve Crest Boulevard is neanng completion of
its expansion project Consequently, Designer Sign Systems has submitted a signage permit
application in hopes of having signs in place before the new facilities open
ANALYSIS
The clinic is proposing to remove the existing freestanding sign at its current main entrance
The new main entrance will be further to the west At this entrance will be a new
freestanding sign The base and pillar matenals will be similar to those found on the clinic's
extenor elevations Also, in order to direct users of the facility to the correct areas of the
campus, five directional signs are proposed
A Freestanding Sign Twd; JG/ a J r 14c-ai,4 444,11.4 c m�h
a Details
i As seen in the attached drawings, the freestanding sign will be 6 feet
tall and include a sign face of 37 2 square feet The aluminum faces
will be painted navy blue with lettenng that will be translucent white
and illuminated internally The sign will maintain a setback of 15 feet
from the front property line
b Performance Standards
i City Code Section 31, Subd 26 (Zoning Code, Sign Regulations),
Paragraph (9)b includes performance standards for freestanding signs
in the BP zoning distncts The clinic is located within a BP zoning
distnct
1 Surface area may not exceed 100 square feet The proposed
37 2 square foot sign does not exceed this maximum standard
2 Only one freestanding sign is allowed per development Only
one is proposed for the clinic
Clinic sign permit
Page 2
3 The sign must maintain at least a 15 foot setback from front
and side property lines The side property line is well over 15
feet away from the proposed sign location, and the sign will
built at the 15 foot front setback line
4 City Code Section 31, Subd 26 (Zoning Code, Sign
Regulations), Paragraph (12) a states that freestanding signs
along Curve Crest Boulevard between Greeley and Washington
Avenue may not exceed a height of six feet The proposed
freestanding sign has a height of six feet
ii The West Business Park Design Guidelines, which the clinic property
is subject to, states on Page 20, Paragraph 4 that freestanding signs are
required to have a landscaped area of shrubs or flowers around the
base of the sign This landscaping area is to have twice the square
footage of the sign Therefore, the proposed 37 2 square foot sign face
requires at least a 74 4 square foot landscaped bed around the sign
base
B Directional signs
a Details
i As seen in the attached drawings, there are five proposed directional
signs All of these signs share the same shape, navy blue and white
color scheme, and aluminum matenals Each sign will be under six
feet in height The sign faces will be either 5 6 square feet in area or
8 3 square feet in area, depending upon the directions given and
motonst visibility Location of the signs can be seen in the attached
site plan
b Performance standards
i The City Code defines a directional sign (Ch 31, Subd 26(3)) as "an
official sign that contains no advertising and provides direction or
instruction to guide persons or vehicles " Unfortunately, the term
"official sign" is not defined anywhere Moreover, except for the
defimtion of a directional sign, the ordinance never mentions where
they are allowed and gives no performance standards for them
Therefore, the City Code gives no clear standards to review the
proposed directional signs against
ii It is reasonable to expect that a campus setting such as the expanded
clinic needs to direct motonsts to vanous areas on the campus
Moreover, the five proposed directional signs seem to be reasonably
proportioned and designed
ALTERNATIVES
The Heritage Preservation Commission has several options
1 Approve the sign permit design review
2 Approve the sign permit design review with modifications or conditions
3 Deny the sign permit review
Clinic sign permit
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds that the signage package meets all Code specific performance standards except
that landscaping must be provided around the base of the sign Therefore, we recommend
Alternative 2, with the condition that a landscape plan must be submitted and approved by
the Community Development Director pnor to issuance of a sign permit
cc Dan Ginkel
attachments Location Map
Application booklet
FROM Designer Sign Systems
14%24/2006 14 18 6514208810
FAX NO 7637842300 Apr 24 2006 03 50PM P2
c Y r1 CF STILLWATER
PAGE 02
DESIGN REVIEW APPLI('il II 1,1 Pi I'ORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE t '
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant la responsible 1Pi '
Iupporting material submitted t1
material (Le. photos, aketcheh,
property of the City of Stillwal Rol
'required
Fourteen (14) copies of all su t9p
All following Information Is regyelipul
IP11 DI !
4rldress 0 Prop cta)114.—.
Toning District ti)-1_ Desi l ti
"1 hereby state the loregornc,
submitted herewith in all negole,
true and correct I f9urther Ott i, ht,
used'
llf -press tative Is not property r,r
C
�r operty Owner I t
�Halling Addres�sLL b4 Cr _Ctrs)' -'.1L„
�'Ity State Zrpc; LtW ,[ s: -042 --
'� Telephone No 9g9 3
'
Case No. Pr,
Date Filed:
Receipt No.:._.__.,.,
Fee: $25.00
i rl�t��►«a+• sand accuracy Mali forms and
' an N fill iny application. All supporting
(lett as viithl application becomes the
a►kt5ic 1 r4 and a letter of Intent es
(Anti los 1-E: required
' 111 IN I F' i 1TION
Scn! re$ . al ce' No sv(9,3oae1 '0700/i
(Required)
ei..t an d, ,J,IlF9tirvviSK J6,,ittAJ S t v\
' r Silt ate, Information and evidence
re he P e, rrry knowledge and belief, to be
l , It mri»yIret* the permit IfitIsgranted and
1' opr ,,'y ,1 finer's signature is 1, gulred
tative
,Idress.
,I t E& Zip
i ale t�l ) f' No 1
Signature J+
(Required)
W \mcnamarn\9hetIa\2005\dealgn review pl., rdt
►0't
to)
7 s rjAa44cS...�tct.
ed)
_R2_1 W RIOW R 1 9W
r344
-132N
r3 IN! 1 I T3IN
1
DON
1 Y04.4.1(.1,,,iteiRE HERE
T29N 1-29N
T28N
T27NV T27N
R22W R2 1 W R2OW
728N
Vicinity Map
0 1200
Scale in Feel
. maw Mew. oan laton
end row... of twal nosedis as they
De,vorkos Wee.. County Ones
Praren crosed te used cal woe
pope. only ...Ion C.. cid
r.ry re, an won cas
. Washington County eta ofte
Phone Oa 30-6,'
isean an ASPOO forme
curt. thio ph cows POOP
an pr ted pin X03
Tuesday Apnl 25 2006
City of Stillwater
Design Review
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater MN 55082
Dear Design Review
Stillwater Medical Group has asked Designer Sign Systems to provide new signs for their
expanded campus The details of the signs follow
Freestanding Identification Sign
The new freestanding identification sign s design is very similar to the existing freestanding sign
— existing sign will be removed
The sign base and architectural pillar are constructed of the same stone used on the building
The "sign" component is a double face internally illuminated cabinet sign with painted aluminum
faces The copy is routed from the aluminum faces and backed with translucent acrylic Only
the copy element of the sign face illuminates — the remainder of the sign is opaque
Freestanding Directional Signs
A great deal of planning went into the design and message of the directional sign schedule We
felt it was very important to design signs that were consistent with the high level of architectural
detail found throughout the campus We also wanted to clearly direct our customers to the
appropnate areas of our expanded clinic's "campus"
The sign s are comprised of three inch aluminum posts with three inch deep aluminum panels
All signs share the same shape and message style The size of the sign was dictated by the
ease by which the message could be read
We are hopeful that the countless hours spent designing our integrated campus sign schedule
are obvious and that you approve the sign package as submitted
Rpectfubr�r fitted
Dan Ginke
Exterior Project Manager
a
Exterior Monument Sign
Pantone 540C
il member il-.1-..akevieuillealth •-• •
5i;t7,4,74:-Tv:1141-4vi
1.)
two,tre.- -1•10,r
-
wt. 4
v"s9VIOS
MY.
This Drawing is the property of Designer Sign Systems Inc It is submitted to your company for the sole purpose
of your consideration of whether to purchase this drawing or to purchase from Designer Sign Systems Inc a
sign(s)manufactured according to these plans Distnthibon or exhibition of this plan to anyone other than
employees of your company or use of this plan for construction of a similar sign to the one(s) embodied herein
is forbidden In the event that such exhibition occurs Designer Sign Systems Inc will expect to be reimbursed for
the time and matenais used in creating this drawing
Project Name Curve Crest Clinic Extenor Signage
Client Stillwater Medical Group
Date April 07, 2006
File Name Dan/Flexi/CurveCrest/Extenor Ideas 120605 fs
9975 Flanders Court NE Blaine MN 55449
(763) 784-5858 (763) 784-2300 Fax
158 in
154 in
100 in
46 in
42 in
10 in
84 in
100 in
STILLWATER
MEDICAL GROUP
�1 ]ncnr.G(rn�L��lr��ir.<<� 11�:a/tIr.
46 in
c
O
154 in
158 in
April 21, 2006
9975 Flanders Court NE, Blaine, MN, 55449 (763) 784-5858 (763) 784-2300 Fax Project Manager Dan Ginkel
t•
1310 SYSTEMS
Main Entrance
Specialty Clinic
Pharmacy Parking
Urgent Care
Shipping & Receiving
- Specialty Clinic
E- Pharmacy Entrance
- Urgent Care
Shipping & Receiving
Entrance Located On
West Orleans Street
\PS -
Pharmacy Entrance -�
Pharmacy Parking H
This Drawing is the property of Designer Sign Systems Inc It is submitted to your company for the sole purpose
of your consideration of whether to purchase this drawing or to purchase from Designer Sign Systems Inc a
sign (s)manufacbired according to these plans Distnbution or exhibition of this plan to anyone other than
employees of your company or use of this plan for construction of a similar sign to the one(s) embodied herein
is forbidden In the event that such exhibition occurs Designer Sign Systems Inc will expect to be reimbursed for
the time and materials used in aeating this drawing
ti"I it L.L.\V/VI'F
E- Pharmacy Entrance
H Pharmacy Parking
ti"1'11.1.1V,\fI:I:
Tliniik 1 bii.
Project Name Curve Crest Clinic Extenor Signage
Client Stillwater Medical Group
Date Apnl 07, 2006
He Name Dan/Flexi/CurveCrest/Extenor Ideas 120605 fs
9975 Randers Court NE Blaine MN 55449
(763) 784-5858 (763) 784-2300 Fax
Freestanding ID Sign
Street
cms
r-'
11111211.1. A.
•
MS IMNIM•
Draws me malty Emo,A,*
West Orleans Street
l' tt it,/
��ddreYe 44 tali Emen,.rl
1.` De uaw rt 1702e42
A10
INKS AL PARKI
•K -i S. iS
GP •
0*ETADOlAlfe
da] SAL
'ns RBI ROM
e AT LOOK ARAM
▪ li STING
STQlWATER MEDICAL CLINIC
S PICE STORY BRICK BI.tDMC
RBI ROOT
AT DOM "RJR
N e Ste
47 o 110
210 MT Cr,*z
New Sign J
s
QI
z
O
I
�p y
cc e
e
f
VII
Memorandum
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
To Heritage Preservation Commission
From Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
Date Apnl 26, 2006
Re
Northern Vineyards Winery
Design Review for free-standing grape arbor
Case DR/06-20
BACKGROUND
Robin Partch of Northern Vineyards Winery plans to construct a free-standing arbor for
grapevines The arbor would be located on the winery's second floor deck
The proposed 10 foot tall arbor would over time provide a covering of vines for the majority
of the deck area Only the most easterly two feet of deck would remain open to the sky
Arbor construction would be of green pressure treated pine, braced with turnbuckled cables
At maturity the vine covered arbor would soften the industrial look of the rear of the former
Maple Island facility
ALTERNATIVES
The Hentage Preservation Commission has several options
1 Approve the design review application
2 Approve the design review application with modifications or conditions
3 Deny the design review application
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the arbor design review
cc Robin Partch
attachments Letter from applicant
Application form
Picture of current deck
Drawing of arbor improvement
I
Northern Vineyards
April 13, 2006
Design Review Committee
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
The proposed project is for a free-standing grape arbor to be constructed on the existing
second -floor deck on the east (Water Street) side of Northern Vineyards Winery, 223 North
Main Street
The arbor would be 24 feet on each side and 10 feet tall Vertical supports would be 4' x 6
green -treated pine, horizontal members would be 2' x 10' green treated pine through -bolted
to the posts Cables with turnbuckles will provide lateral stiffening, diagonal bracing of 4 x
4" green -treated pine will be through -bolted to the posts and horizontal members
Green vinyl -coated 2" x 4" 16 gauge wire mesh will be stapled across the top of the structure
to support the grape vines
There are two vigorous grapevines growing on the site Currently they are helping to soften
the outline of the steel structure that the deck is built on Eventually they will also cover the
arbor and trail over the sides I expect that only the posts will be visible from the street
during the growing season
erely,
Robin Partch
Northern Vineyards Winery
223 North Main Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 • 651-430-1032
www northernvineyards com • northernvineyards@att net
r
Case No Dill
Date Filed
Receipt No - D� 7
Fee: $25.00
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms
and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All
supporting material (0 e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application
becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required
All following information is required
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 2�3 N filQ'n S'A Assessor's Parcel No 2F-613O `2O--/f-Oo27
Zoning District C 13 Di Description of Project in detail 5�e ci-E+aclled
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and
evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the
permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required
Property Owner LL ✓‘ Park_ Represen
Mailing Address Z2 3 N nu. , Sfmg-t Mailing A
City State Zip SflikYA-, M/V 58 -City State Zi
Telephone No 5 -`[3O -t 03Z
Signature
dreRECEIVED
Telephon: No
Signature
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
C \DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\DWARD\DESKTOP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD February 5 2003
Aalm it25,t4
. • '--
.-;,..,:',.:4;;;•,i,-•:-;:..'.::,Wi:-;-i';:‘;;J,Lg.,,:l.',.'..z''.":',:.;z:-4;';;,:ls.t-hit:'LF.:'
A'.',Ya4;:'..',7!'?,-;4-,1,-'4,,;I:i',.--?:;..,4:-.L",-,,.?:.-.5.....t-t-i.'.;,7,...:::,..;,-...a-:..;- ..,
':•.',.''
w
,x k.
RI
f i i NoplifERN vint,Ans WE src. 5 SALES
Memorandum
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
To Hentage Preservation Commission
From Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
Date Apnl 27, 2006
Re Mills on Main
Rooftop Venting, Exterior Colors
BACKGROUND
Mr Dave May, developer of Stillwater Mills on Main, attended the Apnl Hentage
Preservation Commission (HPC) to discuss the issues of roof venting and skylights for his
project At the end of Apnl a special HPC meeting was convened to discuss color choices
for the extenor cementious siding and garage doors The result of both meetings was that
Mr May would have test areas of the venting and siding/garage doors prepared for HPC
review at its May meeting That has been completed and can now be discussed
COURSE OF ACTION
1 Sometime before the May 1, 2006 HPC meeting, Commissioners are asked to
individually visit the Mills on Main project to view and consider
a Venting options — These can best be viewed from North Second Street at
Linden Street A picture of the test area on the roof is attached, so you may
ponder the situation before you visit the project site Compare the venting in
the foreground with the unaltered venting in the background
b Colors for the cementious siding and garage doors - By 3 00 PM on Friday the
28th of May the test areas will be painted and labeled
2 At the HPC meeting on May 1st Mr May and his specialists will discuss the venting
and siding/garage door color options
3 If the HPC feels comfortable with the siding/garage door color options, approve them
and Mr May can continue with the vertical surface finishing
4 If the HPC feels relatively comfortable with a combination of actions that can
mitigate the rooftop venting situation, make a recommendation that will be forwarded
to the City Council
cc David May
Attachment rooftop picture
/
Page 2
Mills on Main
DRAFT
Memorandum
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
To Hentage Preservation Commission
From Bill Tumblad, Community Development Director
Date Apnl 27, 2006
Re
227 North Main Street
Design Review
Case DR/06-19
BACKGROUND
Mainstream Development Partnership, LLC is planning to develop 227 North Main Street This
would represent the final phase of development on the former Maple Island site Currently, the
property in question has a hardware store and surface parking lot The proposed project would
demolish the hardware store and create a 45 000 square foot mixed use building as follows
• 14,000 square feet of below grade parking for 31 vehicles
• 14,000 square feet of commercial space on the ground floor
• 14,000 square feet of single tenant office space on the second floor
• 14,000 square feet of residential on the third floor (7 units with 2,000 s f each)
• Pool, pool house and loft areas for two of the condominium units on the rooftop/fourth floor
/tMot1G -maw T;E Cokerfte re;(4-t,
The ei4 r approvals required of the City'
1 Special Use Permit for a pnvate parking facility for more than five cars' in the Central
Business Distnct
2 Special Use Permit for residential units in the Central Business District
3 Variance from the recently adopted height limit of three stones or 35 feet, since a partial
fourth story of about 50 feet is proposed
4 Variance from the minimum required number of parking spaces, since 31 spaces are provided
and apparently 63 spaces are required
5 Variance to allow building improvements (steps and balconies) to encroach upon public
property
6 Vacation of City's parking easement over north parking lot
7 Demolition permit for removal of the hardware store
8 Design review permit
_ a3 5O
ald
p Prrick va `v rai ct kb pkpittA,, LT Qok id wa u � Co t pou.vo -- 3
'eR>ci iv6. S -row Nl
RE IEW STANDARD
It is the Hentage Preservation Commission s (HPC) charge to review Items 7 and 8 in the list above
the design review permit and demolition permit
227 North Mam Street
Page 2
DRAFT
The property is located within the City's historic downtown commercial district Consequently, the
design standards found in the Design Manual Commercial Histonc District apply to the property
They are attached for your convenience Also the Downtown Plan identifies the property as Special
Site #6 Therefore, the design guidelines for the special site are also attached
A demolition permit will have to be submitted and reviewed by the HPC at a future date
ALTERNATIVES
The HPC has the following options
1 Approval of the design review as submitted
2 Denial of the design review since the level of detail submitted by the applicant is insufficient
to provide a full picture of the final building
3 Table the design review request for more details
4 Approve the design review conceptually with conditions
s74W 77ELc6vag ,to,P5 r,i mZ#4 u es -TV co/AN-020AI S&'A pe,P&$e
ZLAALIA PLACAF AtA/0 `7i C6a4D q.cer Aib te-14AA V.41214)145
Pot 40n ,uwt T-1� cv 1) bute-..4A.&
RECOMMENDATION
Since the current submittal package does not contain sufficient details, or large enough plan sets, to
thoroughly review the design of the project, staff does not feel comfortable recommending final
approval yet If the HPC feels comfortable granting conceptual approval of the project, then staff
would recommend including the/ ollowing conditions
Fart 6ll/9
1 Pnor to approval of a final design review permit, colored rendenng perspectives of the
three extenor elevations must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the HPC
2 Pnor to approval of a final design review permit, detailed full scale building elevations
showing all matenals and color choices shall be submitted to, reviewed by and approved
by the HPC
3 Pnor to approval of a final design review permit, the following view perspective
drawings are to be submitted to and reviewed by the HPC 1) from 2"d Street at Lmden
Street toward the project, 2) from the southeasterly most corner of Pioneer Park looking
over the project site, 3) from the top of Mam Street stairs looking northward up Main
Street, 4) from Mulberry Point along the St Croix River toward the project, and 5)
looking northward up Mam Street from the intersection of Myrtle Street and Main Street
4 Prior to approval of a final design review permit, a certified plot plan (at a scale of 1 100
or larger) shall be submitted that clearly shows and labels all property lines, the
dimensions of all encroachments into publicly owned space, and the dimensions of all
setbacks
5 Prior to approval of a final design review permit, details of all roof penetrations must be
submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the HPC This is required in order to
visualize all roof venting, roof stacks, etc
6 No rooftop venting or other penetrations are allowed, unless specifically approved by the
HPC and the City Council
7 A demolition permit application must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the
HPC pnor to demolition of the hardware store
t
227 North Main Street
Page 3
DRAFT
8 Pnor to approval of a final design review permit, a signage plan must be submitted to,
reviewed by and approved by the HPC In addition, a sign permit application must be
submitted to and approved by City staff pnor to installation of any signs on the project
site
9 Pnor to approval of a final design review permit a landscape plan must be submitted to,
reviewed by and approved by the HPC
10 Pnor to approval of a final design review permit, an extenor lighting plan must be
submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the HPC
11 Prior to approval of a final design review permit a preliminary site grading and drainage
plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer
12 All utilities and mechanical equipment shall either be internally located or completely
screened from general public views on Main Street the St Croix River Second Street
and the top of the Main Street stairs This does not include utility venting, which is the
subject of other conditions of approval, nor does it include transformers that must provide
access for Xcel Energy employees
13 All gutters, downspouts flashings, etc shall be of a color that matches the adjacent
surface
14 No mechanical equipment shall be allowed outside on the rooftop If the rooftop
swimming pool is allowed by the City Council any mechanical equipment associated
with it must be located completely indoors
15 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from Main
Street
16 All required landscaping shall be installed pnor to final project inspection
17 No trash enclosures are planned to be located outside Therefore, no trash enclosures or
trash bins will be allowed without pnor approval of the HPC
18 All construction activity shall conform to the City's noise ordinance Construction
during dry periods shall mitigate dust problems
19 All minor modifications to the final design review permit shall be approved in advance
by the Community Development Director All major modifications shall be approved in
advance by the HPC Determination of the distinction between major' and minor"
shall rest with the City Administrator
attachments Applicant s letter
Excerpt from Downtown Plan
Excerpt from Downtown Design Manual
Application drawings
12 Apnl
2006
Historic Preservation Committee and Planning Commission Members
Mainstream Development Partnership LLC (MDP) is mtendng to develop 227 North Main Street (the hardware store and
parking lot imrnedatey North) MDP is proposing its third end final phase of the redevelopment of the Maple island Dan;
buildng This proposal is a mixed use development that continues to expand on the City of Stillwater cue Plan
Metropolitan Carnal Lrvabie Communities Act and MDP comnmtment to prowling a place for sty oriented services that
improve the felon of down loam Sblhvater This development will complete an eight year process that transformed two blocks of
unoccupied blight into over 80 000 gsf of community oriented mixed use space
Project Goals
The development was the impetus for improvements to the nver front City parking lots, over 110 spaces Mulberry Point, Water
Street Improvements and development on North Main Street The conmplebon of the Maple Island project provides an increase
parcel valuation from $600 000 in 1997 to over $12M It will also provide over 120 new full time jobs downtown We feel this
project exemplifies a process that incorporates Met Council incentives City of Stilhvater goals and pirate development
ambitions that contribute to the future of Stillwater
Project Scope
MDP is proposing removing the Maple Island Hardware building and surface parking lot Replacmg it will be 14 000 gsf of
ground floor community serviaehetail space (committed tenant) that is accessible to street level at Main Street with seance and
pedestnan access from Water Street The second floor provides 14 000 gsf of Bass A office space (committed tenant) with
access from Mann Street The third and fourth floor loft provides seven 2000 gsf residential units The development is served by
private underground parking for 31wdh enclosed trash sernce
Project Design
The architectural design is sympathetic to the current complaints regarding busking heights The bolting massing and material
use draws insprabon from neighboring bu ikbngs both tnstonc and contemporary Bulking massing is broken into three masses
on Main Street The taller mass (center containing the loft units) is stepped back from the bulling face to reduce the impact of
the 43' height and includes architectural features, balcony structure and bay window to reduce scale The north and south
masses include copper dad box bays and cybnxtncai tower elements that reduce scale and provide pedestrian shelter Main
Street pedestnan level uses storefront glazing with transom panels, steel posts and lintels and detailed base panels. Mulberry
elevation provides covered bulking access/egress highlighted with capper nvdpant, dividing the braking mass m half This
etevabon takes up a 6 grade dfference that starts at the comer entrance at Main to service access at Water Water Street
elevation continues the pattern of service access that occurs on both south and north Water Street Access to the underground
parking and trash occur at grade level Semi trailer access oocxrs off street, screened by a low bnck retaining wall Service and
access are protected by a sloped metal shed roof Above the service roof are copper box bays and comer towers that break up
the bnck mass. Roof design includes architectural features enclosing vent pipes (trellis and planters) screened HVAC units and
a elegant awed metal roof The remaining flat roof will have a pool with deicing gray trap rock ballast and gray access
pavers. Details incorporated in the deign will be fish and water oriented Some of these details mdude copper 'fish scale'
shingles fish embossed copper base panels, fish and waves cast m the concrete base and wavy wrought iron fencing and
balustrades
This final phase requires resolution to three issues to make it a success,
1 Development in the FEMA flood plain, MDP has initiated the MT 1 elevation based on fill map revision application
seeking the FEMA elevation certificate
2 MDP LLC is requesting the city vacate the parking easement on the property
3 Preliminary parking requirement totals for the project are 63 stalls, the project provides 31
NDNi ARA
S N� 1389) KW. AR 01 9D
0 NAI 91
AL_ 651 4,9 2 86
AA 651 19 1061
E�7 212 N NA 1 1
611 AIER nl 5 092
Allowable Building Summary (per CBD Crty of SWlwater zoning ordnance)
Zoning Drstnct. Central Business District
Maximum Height 3 ,c
Minimum Lot. 10 000 sf
Setbacks Front 15
Rear 20'
Side 20 total
Lot Coverage 80% of lot area
Landscape Area 20% of lot area
Exceptions mfill lots, the frond, side and rear setback may be similar to the setback for Anent bullrings
Parking Requirements
Business Professional 11300 sf
Multifamily Ajatrrrents. 15 per unit, 1 per 3 units for guests
Convenience 111000 sf
227 North Main Sheet Development Summary
- The project is a 45 000 +1- sf mixed usa bulking
Sub -grade partorg for 31+ (14 000 sf)
Ground floor convenience 14,000 sf on Main Street.
Second floor single tenant office (14 000 sf).
Third floor cond nHrnRns (7 units CO 2 000 sf)
Fourth FloorlRoaf that mcludes a pod and pool house and 2 loft units (second floor)
Refer to development plans for speafic information and detail
Thank you for yo271....t.
and commitment to improving Stillwater
Tim Stefan
STEFAN ASSOClA7ES
Architects and Landscape Ardutects
406 5861142 tasfan@aol corn
Mainstream Development Partnership, LLC
Indbsires, Fabian development tear throngs metma t model
cc. V Stefan
--N.C€,Z15-1
Design Guidelines
o Dependent on building design, no setback may be
required along Main Street
o Required parking shall be provided on site.
o Access to parking areas shall be limited to Mulberry
and Main Street for commercial uses.
o The project design and landscape plan should complement
the new streetscape design for the North Main Street
area.
o A landscaped buffer or residential use shall be located
along Second Street
o The Central Business District and Downtown Design
Guidelines shall be met.
Special Site #6
The Maple Island site includes the Maple Island Plant, Water
Street and existing railroad spur to the east. The full
potential of the approximately two acre site is dependent on
the vacation of Water Street and removal of railroad storage
tracks. Without railroad tracks removed, visual as well as
pedestrian access to the river is limited. The site is cri-
tical to the Downtown because it provides a link between the
South Main Street existing historic retail/office area and
the North Main Street activity area The site could connect
the river and Mulberry Point to Main Street and has the
potential to create a central major focal point for
Downtown The site presents an opportunity to retain the
zero setback Main Street edge while providing a more contem-
porary site development design The design plan calls for a
mixed use, office/retail/housing complex with market plaza
and arcade opening up to the river. The site also has
potential for a hotel/mixed use project with its proximity
48-A
D),,,o, r-p r(/.c
Fu C c-7t r3 )
ILA N
to Downtown, the marina and river. Lands to the south, west
or east of the site could be included in the project
depending on the development concept.
Preferred Land Use
Mixed use, retail/office/residential or hotel/retail.
Design Guidelines.
o The project design should take full advantage of the
river by providing views and pedestrian access.
o Main Street building setback shall be determined by
building design, provision of pedestrian amenities, and
sensitivity to Main Street.
o A market plaza or similar public open space pedestrian
amenity, connecting Main Street to the river, should be
incorporated into the design of the site.
o The project landscape plan and design shall complement
the new streetscape plan for Mulberry Boulevard and
North Main Street.
o Adequate right-of-way shall be provided for Mulberry
Boulevard improvements.
o The project shall meet the Central Business District
and Floodplain regulations and the Downtown Design
Guidelines.
South Riverfront Property, Site #7
This City -owned site runs from the parking lot just south of
Brick Alley and the southern boundaries of Lowell Park to
Sunnyside Marina to the south as shown on Figure 6. The
site represents tremendous opportunity for addition to the
City riverfront parks and open space system The site is
currently leased from the City for river barge operations.
49
1
Overview of Design Manual
Design Principles for New Construction
New infill buildings should fit into the fabnc of existing buildings and the overall streetscape and not present a jarring cohtrast with
what is already there Therefore, design guidelines for existing storefronts also hold true for new construction The basic principle for
new construction in histonc Downtown Stillwater is to maintain the scale and character of present buildings Generally new structures
should provide height, massing, setback, materials and rhythm compatibility to surrounding structures The reproduction of histonc
design and details is expensive, artificial and is recommended only in some special cases of infill or small-scale construction
Design Principles for Restoration and Rehabilitation
Many buildings in Downtown Stillwater retain their original character, there are also many buildings that have been altered so
drastically since they were first constructed that little remains of their original design Rear walls and upper floors of older buildings
sometimes show their ongmal character and from these areas one can imagine the ongmal appearance of the fronts of these buildings
Of course, old photos are also helpful, and an abundance of photographic evidence is available at the State Histonc Preservation
Office, the Washington County Histoncal Society and the John Runk photo collection at the Stillwater Public Library
To the extent possible, modification to storefronts and building facades should seek to remove inconsistent present layers of siding and
signage to emphasize the design and matenals of the ongmal building New designs may be appropriate if the building has been
altered to the point that the ongmal design has been destroyed Any new design should respect the proportions as well as the detailing
of the ongmal design and should use matenals, which are consistent with those used in the ongmal buildings New design elements
such cloth awnings, flower boxes or signage which did not exist at previous times may be appropriate to give the building both color
and character Care must be taken so design elements are not applied which attempt to make a building appear as if it is from a period
or style other than it really is
General pnncipals for restoration and rehabilitation are taken from the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
All work should be of a character and quality that maintains the distinguishing features of the building and environment The removal of
architectural features is not permitted
Detenorated architectural features should be repaired rather than replaced whenever possible In the event of replacement, new materials should
match the ongmal in composition, design color, texture and appearance Duplication of ongmal design based on physical or pictorial evidence is
preferable to using conjectural of "penod" designs or using parts of other buildings
Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship charactenstic of structures of a penod should be treated sensitively
Furthermore, if changes m use of a building are contemplated, they should be accomplished with minimum alteration to the structure and fabnc
In general, it is expected that buildings will be restored to their ongmal appearance However, alterations to buildings are significant
because they reflect the history of the building and the distnct This significance should be respected and restoration to an �ongmal appearance
may not always be desirable All buildings should be recognized as products of their own time (Example A building that was constructed in 1890
should resemble a building from 1890 )
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
5
Overview of Design Manual
Pedestrian -Oriented Design
Background
Throughout history there have been places m the city where people could go to see people, and be seen Downtown Main Street
Stillwater has played its traditional role as a place where people can meet, see others, and be seen themselves This is part of what
makes it so special It is often the downtown main street that identifies an independent small town from genenc suburban
environments Maintaining the pedestnan quality of the main street through the use of "pedestrian -oriented design" is critical We
know that this design works because it is this 'promenade' model of a traditional main street that has been copied m every regional
shopping mall ever created
Guidelwes
• The design of the building should help make the street enjoyable, visually interesting and comfortable Individual buildings
should be integrated with the streetscape to bang activity in the building in direct contact with the people on the street
• Avoid blank walls, closed curtains, and neglected storefronts These are all pedestrian turn-offs Put two or three in a row and
you've killed the attraction to pedestrians It doesn't work in a mall and it doesn't work downtown
• Natural light should be allowed to penetrate into the store interior
• Displays should allow the customer a full view of the store intenor
• Window displays should be attractive when viewed from both the sidewalk and the store mtenor
• Light fixtures should be hidden from view
• Window displays should allow people in the store to see out
• Existing uninteresting street facades can be enhanced with detailing, artwork, landscaping or other visually interesting features
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER MINNESOTA
1
i
Overview of Design Manual
Trademark Building Design
Background
Trademark buildings have been designed in such a way as to make the services or goods sold immediately recognizable through the use of a
specific architectural design, materials and colors of the building These were first developed on or near high-speed freeways where taking the time
to read a sign would be too difficult Such designs are generally in conflict wilh the charactenstics of pedestnan oriented commercial storefronts
Guidelines
• Trademark buildings are prohibited
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
7
Design Criteria
Design Guidehnes
The following guidelines, for the most part, deal with general rather than specific design elements in order to provide direction yet
stimulate and encourage architectural innovation
• Setback
• Proportion
• Height
• Parking
• Rear Entrances
• Roofs
• Utility Areas and Mechanical Equipment
• Detailing
• Facade Openings
• Matenals
• Color
• Lighting
• Awnings
• Signs and Graphics
• Architectural Signs
• Storefront Signs
• Window Signs
• Projecting Signs
• Painted Wall Signs and Murals
• Landscaping
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
1
Setback
Background
Nothing does more to negatively change the social space of a small downtown street than the front building setback The recent emphasis onthe
automobile and parking lots in front of commercial structures can effectively destroy a pedestrian expinence It is far better to build nght up to the
sidewalk and facilitate the chances for browsing social interaction and people watching On occasion creating public space with a larger building
setback can be successful, if the emphasis remains on creating a space that complements and enhances the streetscape
Guidelines
• Infill buildings shall be built to the Main Street front property line, flush to adjacent buildings Exceptions may be granted if
the setback is pedestrian onented and contnbutes to the quality and character of Main Street
• Arcades adjacent to Main Street sidewalks are encouraged to increase the effective width of the narrow sidewalks and provide
a sheltered pedestnan path along store display windows
• No side setbacks are allowed unless next to a public pedestnan way
AVOID SETBACK FROM ADJACENT
BUILDINGS
BUILD IN LINE WITH ADJACENT
BUILDINGS
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
10
1
J
Proportion
Backround
On Main Street new building with wide disproportionate dimensions can easily disrupt the existing pattern of narrow lots and reletively high and
narrow individual facades Also, wide undifferentiated walls or windows can drastically impact the existing pattern of narrow, high facade
openings such as windows and doorways
Guideknes
• The proportion of infill buildings should be sympathetic to the proportion of their neighbors
• Break up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures
• Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent
structures
I L
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER MINNESOTA
11
Height
Background
This is one of the important elements to consider when designing new structures or additions to existing structures While vaned heights can mix
with each other in visually interesting ways, a building, which is significantly taller than adjacent development, will senously disrupt the existing
scale of the downtown area
Guideknes
• The heights of new buildings shall conform to the average height of buildings on the block street face
• The height of new buildings shall be four (4) stones and fifty -feet (50') maximum or two (2) stones minimum, and within ten
percent (10%) of existing adjacent buildings
• Proposals should stnve to maintain compatibility with adjacent cornice lines, floor to floor heights where these are strongly
expressed, sign bands, and any other elements which serve to unify the street elevation as a whole
..ilitiiiiiillit I-
. ; arillti- t
....:Is riirraaw�Mrra.wr:s-_
irrjaC.},t�j�fl ill Sia`— - ,I' t � l� i
iiNti1l�.. '{1,.- .i :! . a, ice 1111 illiti-L
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
12
Parking
Background
The proper placement of the of parking areas in a traditional downtown are important factors in ensuring commercial success and maintaining a
unique pedestrian expenence
Guidelines
• Every effort should be made to maximize the retail space directly on Main Street and locate parking areas behind the buildings
• Parking lots should be screened from the street and the sidewalk either by walls or plantings or both If walls are used, their
matenal should be compatible with the walls of existing adjacent buildings Walls should be at least eighteen inches (18") high
• Parking structures should take advantage of the topography of the site to conceal the structure to the extent possible from public
view The same care should be taken in the design of the parking as with any other building regarding setbacks, height, proportions
facade openings, detailing and matenals The structure should complement the streetscape through the accent landscaping or other
pedestrian amenities
• Parking structures shall be designed to minimize the use of blank facades directly on the street
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER MINNESOTA
13
Rear Entrances
Background
In the past, rear entrances served as service entrances only and were not intended for public use Today, with the emphasis on automobile parking
taking place behind businesses, the rear entrance is an important public access
Guidelines
• The rear facade entrance should be clean and well maintained and present a welcome appearance A small sign, awnings, display
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
14
1
_p
windows and planter boxes can improve the appearance
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER MINNESOTA
15
Roofs
Background
One of the major differences between residential and commercial buildings is the roof pitch
form of slopmg or pitched roof whereas commercial structures are known for their reletivly
wall plane If this vertical extension is low, it is known as a parapet, if the extension beyond
of the building, it is known as a false front
Guidelines
• The predominant roof shape in the commercial core is flat (slightly sloped to
often embellished with bnck detailing, are often stepped or sloped to achieve
along the building facade
• Infill building roofs shall be flat or gently pitched and hidden behind parapet
• Roof edges should be related in size and proportion to adjacent buildings
or roofline Residemial structures usually have some
flat roofs, often hidden by the extension of the from
the roof plane is great, sometimes doubling the height
dram), with articulated parapets These parapets,
a visually mteresting yet harmonious sequence
walls that articulate the rhythm of the building
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
16
J
Utility Areas and Mechanical Equipment
Background
Histoncally, utility areas or service entrances were accomodated off of a service alley Today, many of those service alleys
or streets are now utilized by pedestrians as entrances from off street parking areas Also, the amount of mechanical
equipment has increased dramatically, therefore it is important to minimize the visual impact as much as possible
Guidelines
• Screen exterior trash and storage areas, service yards, loading areas, transformers and air conditioning units from
view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a manner that is compatible with the building and site design All
roof equipment shall be screened from public view
• Use architectural elements to screen mechanical equipment
In attempting TO create the most aesthetic pedestrian expenence possible, it is important to conceal the visually intrusive
material from view
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOT
A
17
Detailing
Background
Downtown Stillwater has an assortment of masonry structures from the 1860's — 1940's m ltahanate, Queen Anne and Classical Revival styles, to
name just a few The architectural ornamentation includes a vanety of decorative features charactenstic of early commercial storefronts
Articulated tin cornices, corbelled bnckwork, pronounced window lintels and sills are examples of the ornamentation most often seen m
Stillwater's Histonc Downtown District
Guidelines
• The charactenstic architectural features should never be removed or altered unless it is absolutely necessary
• Building alterations should restore architectural details of cornices, lintels, brick arches, chimneys and ironwork of the onginal
building as appropnate and feasable
• Where detailing has already been removed, every effort should be made to replicate them The use of the extensive historic
photographic records of Downtown Stillwater is highly recommended to discover missmg detaihlmg
• Infill architecture should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding buildings in window shape, cornice lines and bnck work
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER MINNESOTA
18
1
J
Facade Openings
Background
It is important to recognize the difference between upper story openings and storefront, or street level openings There is a much greater
transparent or glazed open area at storefront level, for pedestnans to have a better view of the merchandise displayed behmd, there are wide
windows and tittle or no spacing between openings Upper story openings are predominantly narrow with a vertical onentation that accompanies
double -hung wmdows
Guidelines
• The size and proportion of windows and door openings of an mfill building should be similar to those on the adjacent facades
• Avoid infill panels when providing new windows in existing masonry openings
• Storefront restoration should return the facade to its original character appropnate
• Avoid concealing the onginal facade
The majority of storefronts have very common elements that include (1) entries, (2) kick plates, (3) display windows, (4) transom
windows and a horizontal area for a canopy or sign
Transom windows
Display windows
Entry
Kick Plates
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER MINNESOTA
19
Facade Openings
1 TRANSOM WINDOWS
Background
Transom windows were smaller windows above the display wmdows that functioned as early energy savers They allowed daylight to enter deep
into the interior of the space When operable they allowed excessive heat to escape Transoms also continued the transparent quality of the
storefront up to the top "frame" of the front facade and are therefore an important element in the proportion of the building front
Guidelines
Often transom windows can still be found in downtown buildings underneath exterior cover-ups, and or above dropped ceilings They
should be retained whenever possible If the ceiling inside the store has been lowered, the ceiling could slope up 2-3 feet back to meet
the transom, or dark painted panels can be placed behind transom windows to help simulate transparency and depth
2 DISPLAY WINDOWS
Background
The display window is the link between the pedestrian environment outside and the business inside
Guidelines
• A minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the street level Main Street facade shall be transparent and thirty percent (30%) on side
streets or rear facades
• For remodeling, the original size, division and shape of display windows within the overall storefront frame should be
preserved
• For an infill building, window frames should be wood, or appropnately colored aluminum or vinyl clad
• Reflective glass is prohibited
• Mirrored or heavily tinted glass on the first floor or street level should not be used because it conveys a conflicting modern
design feeling It also creates a blank wall effect, which may be offensive to the pedestrian
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
20
1
1
Facade Openings
3 ENTRIES
Background
Commercial storefront entrees were typically recessed from the front plane of the structure This provided a sheltered transition area to the intenor
of the store, more area for display space, and helped to emphasize the location of the entrance
Guidelines
• Recessed entnes should be retained in existing buildings and required in new storefront construction
• Commercial entry doors use large, glass panels with vertical proportions to aid a sense of mvitation and openness to the
business
• Solid or residential -type doors with small areas of glass should be avoided
• Openings containing double entry doors should be retained
• Painted wood doors and wood framing are preferred Aluminum doors and doorframes, aluminum windows and their
accessones with a clear aluminum finish are not acceptable, although colored anodized aluminum is acceptable
4 KICK PLATES
Background
The kick plate, or bulkhead, functions to protect the display window by raising the glass area to a safer and more easily viewed height
Histoncally, matenals have included wood panels, stone, bnck and ceramic tile
Guidelines
• The onginal kick plate matenals should always be retained, maintained, or uncovered when possible
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER MINNESOTA
21
Materials
Background
Buildings within the commercial core were constructed with bnck, stone or wood Many of the ongmal wood buildings have been lost to fire or
decay, leaving the masonry buildings as the lone remnants Compatability with sinular extenor construction materials in the immediate area is
recommended in order to maintain the distinct character and harmony of the area
Guidelines
• An infill building and facade should be composed of materials similar to ongmal adjacent facades (example local brick or
stone)
• New buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatable with the general area
• The use of exposed or painted concrete masonry units is not acceptable
• The use of materials that attempt to mimic traditional materials is unacceptable An example would be fiberglass panels that
are molded to look like real bnck, or vinyl molded to look like wood horizontal lap siding
AVOID INRODUCING DISSIMILAR MATERIALS
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
22
1
Color
Background
The relationship of the colors and tones used on new or improved structures must be compatible with the color and tone patterns already
established by adjacent buildmgs The tasteful use of color and accent can introduce variety and charm, whereas the mdiscnmmate use of colors
and color combinations can overload the senses and produce visual conflict and chaos Exercise caution m the use of colors and tone combinations
and their patterns The goal is to achieve an area -wide complementary blend of background colors combined with selected and hmited uses of
pnmary and focal colors
GuideLnes
• The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect
• Avoid colors which visually overpower or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established downtown color
schemes as a whole
• The color of beck or other natural building materials should dictate the color family choice
• Painting new infill buildings is prohibited
DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
23
Lighting
Background
Lighting can add special character to the nighttime appearance of the Downtown It can illuminate building entrances, pedestrian walkways, and
advertising or floodlight special buildings However, if left without consideration of the entire downtown expenence, unchecked hghtmg can
produce visual chaos, waste energy and create safety concerns
Guidelines
• A coordinated lighting plan should be submitted for review with building plans Provide information on each individual light
fixture proposed, including fixture sections, lamp type and wattage
• Lighting fixtures should be concealed or integrated into the overall design of the project The light source should be hidden
from direct pedestrian or motorist view
• Unshielded wall pack light fixtures are not appropriate
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
24
1
J
Awnings
Background
Histoncally, awnings were a frequent feature of the commercial buildings downtown Photographic records show how the use of awnings softened
an otherwise hard and ngid streetscape Their main function was to shade the building and the merchendise, however, they were retractable to
allow more daylight in when needed Secondanly, the awnings provided protection for pedestnans and only on occasion did the awning get used
for signage Lettenng on the awnings was seen only on the front valance so it was visiable when the awning was either in the lowered or raised
position
Guidelines
• Retractable or operable awning are encouraged Fixed awnings should mimic the profile of operable units (one to one pitch)
• The emphasis of the awning should remain one of shelter and protection, rather than signage In keeping with this, the awning
should be loose and flowing, not stretched tight, subtle and subdued in color, not bnght, extending well out over the sidewalk,
not a mere window dressing
• The width of awnings should fit the geometry of the building facade They should not extend across multiple storefronts of
different buildings, but should reflect the window or door openings below
• The use of water-repellent or vinyl -coated canvas is in keeping with awnings of the time Plastic or aluminum awnings or
canopies are not appropriate
• Fixed, round -headed awnings will be considered only over arched windows or doors, and only if placed below or within the
arched lintel
• The awning valance, or skirt, shall be proportioned to the size of the awning But shall not exceed twelve (12) inches in height
• Signing on awnings is permitted (in place of other sign types) on the end panel or front valance only Use lettering size
proportional to the space available
• Back lighting of the awnings is inappropriate,
• Use plain or striped fabncs Large areas of bright colors are inappropnate
DESIGN MANUAL COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT STILLWATER MINNESOTA
25
MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT
MULBERRY STREET
227 NORTH MAIN STREET — AXONOMETRIC
SI TE
227 N MAI
II
SITE LOCATION —
DRAWING LIST
110. ,,c
PO SAW
OOL
1
STILLWATER, MN
CI VIL
C1- SURVEY
C2- UTILITIES/DRAINAGE
STRUCTURAL
S1- STRUCTURAL
S2- STRUCTURAL
S3- STRUCTURAL
S4- STRUCTURAL
S5- STRUCTURAL
S6- STRUCTURAL
LANDSCAPE
L- PLANTING PLAN
DEMOLITION
D' - DEMO/FEMA FILL PLAN
BUILDING SUMMARY
ARCHITECTURAL
Al - COVER SHEET
A2 - SITE PLAN
A3 - FOUNDATION PLAN
A4 - GARAGE PLAN
A5 - GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A6 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A7 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN
A8 - FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
A9 - ROOF PLAN
A10- EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS
Al 1 - NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS
Al2- E/W BUILDING SECTION
A13- N/S BUILDING SECTION
A14- WALL SECTIONS
A15- STAIR A & B
A16- ENTRY STAIR & ELEVATOR LOBBIES
A17- DETAILS
A18- DOOR/WINDOW TYPES/FINISHES
ZONING
CBD
ALLOWABLL HEIGHT 50 OR 4 STORIES
SETBACK REQ 0 MAIN MULB-RRY & WATER
PROVIDED 2 10 MAIN 2 @ MU BERRY 18 @ WATER
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
CONVENIENCE (1/1000sf)
OFFICE (1/300s0
HOUSING UNIT (1 5/1 LNIT)
RETAIL (13000 s') = 13 STALLS
OFFICE (13000 sf) = 40 STALLS
7 UNFTS = 11 STALLS
PARKING VARIANCE REQUESTED
J2 STALLS SHORT OF RrOUIRED
BUILDING CODE
OCCUPANCY S2 (PARKING
OCCUPANT LOAD
S2-(1/200sf)
M- (1/60sf &
B 1/100sf
R2- 1/200sf)
R2-( /200sf)
POOL-(1 /50sf)
TOTAL REQUIRED = 63 STALLS
PROVIDED = 31
GARACE) M (MrRCHANTILE) B (OFFICE\ R2 (MU, TI-RESIDENTIAL)
= 65 OCC
1/i00s0 = 270 -+ I = 287 OCC
= 130 OCC
= 65 OCC (3RD FLR )
= 7 OCC (4TH FLR )
= 40 OCC (4TH FLR )
CONSTRUCTION TYPE IV THROUGH OUT
AJTOMATIC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM THROUGH OUT
OCCUPANCY SEPERATION REOUIREMENTS
S2-M = 2HRS
M-B = 2HRS
B-R2 = 2 HRS
EXITING REOUIREMENTS
4TH FLP- 47 OCC x2 = 94
3RD FLR - 65 OCC x 2 = 13
2ND FLR - 130 OCC x 2 = 26
STAIR EGRESS REQ = 49
STAIR EGRESS PROV = 72
1ST FLR - 287 OCC x 15 = 43
GARAGE FLR - 65 OCC x 2= 13
STAIR EGRESS REO = 49
TOTAL EGRESS REO e EXIT = IC5
TOTAL EGRESS POV ® EXIT = 144
R-2 MAX 2000s1 1 EXIT
PLUMBING REOUIREMENTS
GARAGE NOT ALLOWED (FEW)
1ST FLR (287 OCC) = 1 PER SEX OR I UNISEX
2ND FLR (130 OCC) = 3 PEP SEX
3RD & 4TH PER UNIT DESIGN
z
Lil
U)
;1,1
as
if f%
>8 s
S
z
0
1=
CC
1n
z
0
0
50
m �O
Oz
z
8a
i
N
O I-
z_
0
N
a
0 0
COVER SHEET
MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT
WATER STREET
MULBERRY STREET
227 NORTH MAIN ST
ET — AXONOMETRIC
4Q St dw
SITE
227 N MAI �°*®wr
SITE LOCATION —
DRAWING LIST
CIVIL
C 1 - SURVEY
C2- UTILITIES/DRAINAGE
C3-
STRUCTURAL
Si- STRUCTURAL
S2- STRUCTURAL
S3- STRUCTURAL
S4- STRUCTURAL
S5- STRUCTURAL
S6- STRUCTURAL
LANDSCAPE
L 1 - PLANTING PLAN
DEMOLITION
D1- DEMO/FEMA FILL PLAN
BUILDING SUMMARY
5PRIV
STILLWATER, MN
ARCHITECTURAL
Al - COVER SHEET
A2 - SITE PLAN
A3 - FOUNDATION PLAN
A4 - GARAGE PLAN
A5 - GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A6 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A7 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN
A8 - FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
A9 - ROOF PLAN
A10- EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS
A 1 1 - NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS
Al2- E/W BUILDING SECTION
A13- N/S BUILDING SECTION
A14- WALL SECTIONS
A15- STAIR A & B
A16- ENTRY STAIR & ELEVATOR LOBBIES
A17- DETAILS
A18- DOOR/WINDOW TYPES/FINISHES
ZONING
CBD
ALLOWABLE HEIGHT 50 OR 4 STORIES
SETBACK REO 0 MAIN MULBERRY & WATER
PROVIDED 2 ® MAIN 2 ® MULBERRY 18 ® WATER
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
CONNVENIENCE (1/1000sf)
OFFICE (1/300sf)
HOUSING UNIT (1 5/1 UNIT)
RETAIL (13 000 sf) = 13 STALLS
OFFICE (13 000 sf) = 40 STALLS
7 UNITS = 11 STALLS
PARKING VARIANCE REQUESTED
32 STALLS SHORT OF REQUIRED
BUILDING CODE
OCCUPANCY S2 (PARKING GARAGE) M (MERCHANTILE) B (OFFICE) R2 (MULTI —RESIDENTIAL)
OCCUPANT LOAD
S2—(1/200s0 = 65 OCC
M— 1/60sf & 1/300sf) = 270 + 17= 287 OCC
B— 1/100sf) = 130 OCC
R2— 1/200sf = 65 OCC (3RD FLR )
R2— 1/200sf = 7 OCC (4TH FLR )
POOL—(1/50sf) = 40 OCC (4TH FLR)
CONSTRUCTION TYPE IV THROUGH OUT
AUTOMATIC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM THROUGH OUT
OCCUPANCY SEPERATION REQUIREMENTS
S2—M = 2HRS
M—B = 2HRS
B—R2 = 2 HRS
EXITING REQUIREMENTS
4TH FIR— 47 OCC x2 = 94
3RD FLR — 65 OCC x 2 = 13
2ND FLR — 130 OCC x 2 = 26
STAIR EGRESS REO = 49
STAIR EGRESS PROV = 72
1ST FLR — 287 OCC x 15 = 43
GARAGE FLR — 65 OCC x 2= 13
STAIR EGRESS REQ = 49
TOTAL EGRESS REQ ®IDCT = 105
TOTAL EGRESS POV ® EXIT = 144
*R-2 MAX 2000sf 1 EXIT
TOTAL REQUIRED = 63 STALLS
PROVIDED = 31
PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS
GARAGE NOT ALLOWED (FEMA)
1ST FLR (287 OCC) = 1 PER SEX OR 1 UNISEX
2ND FLR (130 OCC ) = 3 PER SEX
3RD & 4TH PER UNIT DESIGN
z
W
z
0
Ir
cn
O
0
Lucr
w0
e21-`
f-O
=o
o i
o
F--
Ld
L1J
CC
F—
z_
F— Z
C
Occ
CVO
CVfn r
COVER SHEET
I -4
Tap
ra°�ownrav SEOPED ." ep.a�n
10sra I'. A rl'-`�-'Yr
/ice I
B
min
ritm
'/
is
OWE AV HAMM
SIE FUN
/u EtA6 1C oGLL
O BRICK sou-0SITE WALL
COM
CURB a WI1FR
6 ogivo ED Q.6S V
STEEL BUMPER GUARD
e4REvut CONE CUR�90Ea'ax
4
ASPHALT MHO 41D mort./
lest' Ora AND 0300 Cw 14011 SPEC.
®TYPICAL CURB AND GUTTER OI NTREGABL CURB
4 SCNE I I -0
MULBERRY STRE
2 0
24 0
17 0 21 6 37 -8
29 -4 6 6 8 0
B 1 2 B
pat am urtaa
8 0
I
A A
l
M
A
Al
�
a s
_
.
' 4!''ipS
'
1
odmP wawa z a me
�
�
. .CAS
lip'-
F
6LELRATINI
� RON
MERI r�
W BpaRI�
N 001•FREO LOSWNG DOCK
-� YLL 1; 9ARE
Af37`YYTYDDS
ii
I
oac nix
STARS ID OE
W0 wax SLOPE
ILO roar
227 NORTH MAIN STREET
14 000 GSF
T 0 S GROUND FLOOR 100 -0 = 693 5
.,,,
um.
CiF714.00
. sow m 01
we au
---.,.
• , v COW-
,.....-----s ax-8
144 -0
,Enctc mots ISIIACm
NORTHERN
VINEYARDS WINERY
O SITE PLAN
MAIN STREET
LL_
w
E—
lY�s`
IE <g
Erlk
zOS
tgi
Ft
z
0
F
0
to
z
0
W U
ix
co WO
(L
ce
s-0
0 z
z
1— z
Oct:
z1-
N
aNcn
= N
SITE PLAN
13381S NIVW
2 0
102 -0
6 0
14 0
22 0
1,4
r
18 0
O
L
gct
®=1
22 D
21
2D 0
n
gg
br+
1�e
8
pz
gtV
RAMP UP
L
Q I I
Sb t No P ofect
A3 227 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
nt1
GARAGE LEVEL PLAN
Job No
01-06
D w by
TS
Revislo s
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Date
10 APRIL 2006
wee e% nr u,.r m arse,
end Im M
polor >,em wm n
w
reoktr Pon
ARCHI
STEFAN
IECiURE LANDSCAPE ARCHIIEC7URE
ASSOCIATES
O
C
0
II
W
CAI
a IA
133211S NIV N
MULBERRY STREET
—
lug a ••
Y
20 0
22 0
18-0
22 0
20-0
` 3-4 4-8 4-0
1' 4 8
-4 4 8
4 4 8 0`
�8 6 0
� 8 0 8-,
``
�2 4 8 -4 4-8 -4 4 8-41
4-0 4 B 3 4 B 0
AreilLit
AiA
C
sA
.
.2
i
O 0O
p
..
O
1
RNttt
44!!
I
�iIA
I
; 1
20 4
20 0
200
•2-4 17-4 2-4-
t
133211S 2L31VM
Sh tNo. Prjet
AA 227 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
Title
GROUND FLOOR
J b No
01-05
Draw by
TS
RvIICIRe
NOT FORwCONSTRUCTION
D to
10 APRIL 2006
nwm rutty Mat Mb b ea.
Dafw.a T under my oral
ly
v.. garat+
as M at YOe 4A
aab mean n..b.r
ARCM
STEFAN
113C1URE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ASSOCIATES
Y cN1 5��}��Npp{�1b MEE
A00.WO.t142 ee110 T8514Jp.7Dee WWt
Wld SOOli ONOD3s
nl
O
1 UL -U
6 -0
14 -0
22 -0
18 0
22 -0
20 -0
14 7
4 8� 4 Ol
4 4 8 4 4 8 -4� 4 HBO
-B 4 0
01 4 -6 7 -4� 4 -B -4� 4 -8 1�
4 0 L 4 -B 4/
\
�
� I L-
\
I
�I11�
—
20 0
'I •
o O
I1
O
11
0
0
I o
m
m
11
•1I
'
N
0
L,0
L.,'
■
..
l_ IJ
11
11
■
22 0
4 0
N
b
it
II�
1
�
-1
I
I
m
O
I
I
�_\
>r<
I
o
o/
$
I
■
I
u n
I
I
1
I
hi
no
u is
�1
I
0
1•---
A
II
1
_-.
III
1'i
9
o
b
I
lIOI!JP'
="Al
so
rn
rn
o f
[1.41
li
11
t
r `
20 0
to
4
0+
Ls
s
II
I
n
OI
l
17
'
i
I
m
■
III
* ..
..
22 0
L
J
1
I
II
li
I
N
Io
®
®
d
1
1
I
it
-
1)
b
'
9-1
16-0
120 0
Sh t N Poje
A5 227 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
Ttle
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
J b No
01-05
D wn by
TS
R ons
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Date
10 APRIL 2006
I I. welly Nat t pm n
,.
.nw.elaa that I as va
a a he *eta al NORM
under
neplabenka number
STEFAN
ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ASSOCIATES
rwmeea a sane rVEZmirs'"
N1d 6001J 081H1
(A1
Sh et N P to t
A6 ST2iLL27WATER NORMNTH MAIN STREET
Ttle
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
Job No
01-05
D w by
Ts
WATER STREET
22 0 18 0 22 —0 20
R Is o s
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
D t
10 APRIL 2006
rob erbly Nat W p
Vmovod by me or mckr
.uandm Inc
o.athat am MA
rosMorml mdsomo a+ avt as
red rb Ion number
STEFAN
ARCHI1
LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTURE
ASSOCIATES
ti i"u i:I.1'i:6
slro13a 3NIN330
Sliv13a 3NIN330
STV13a ONI)133a
SlN13a ONIN33a
SlM130 JNUI33a
Sheet N
Project
A7 227 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
Title
FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
Job No
01-05
0 wn by
TS
R I Io e
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0t
10 APRIL 2006
wtl& N m Ion m onw
prays.* me se under -
woonlaten and Mot am 01
le.aIMowaislonsa
0,ech µ M
ARCH!
STEFAN
TDCTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ASSOCIATES
B�IIVI 1TIN6 T 11. �lEli M an al
9im.Walla OPl10 TOOIA9A2EW OWE
8
T
m m
bE b�
G G
MULBERRY STREET
siro13a sm381
PROPERTY ONE
S
0
2
4
4
20 0
9 0
❑ q ❑
PROPERTY ONE
She t N P l l
A8 227 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
00
ROOF PLAN
J b N R s
01-05 CITY REVIEW
0 awn by NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
TS
of
10 APRIL 2006
seer .duty w OP
p Wad or un or m N.ct
ptoned Imdewye onaiYto a o
STEFAN
ARCHITBCTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ASSOCIATES
F' i ruse o i Y'dXi:Xi"aaea 6
.fir izi1
IIIIIIII: �:I11illl���11111111f,l -1111t111 IIIIIII IHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 , ._ r�
�i� p
•
1
•
•
111(1111111
1
6
6
6
)11111111111111J1J[
J
11111111111r11
111111111111-1
j_1
44
1
it
111111111
1
0
6
8
0
0
Sheet No
P pet
A9 i-3_17„„AiNEF?Rm-NFH MAIN STREET
hue
BUILDING SECTION
Job No
01-05
0 w by
Ts
Rem sions
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 1
10 APRIL 2006
'web certify 1 t tla Iana mtar oat
�m
---
uw
nett.. rumble
STEFAN
ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ASSOCIATES
G
llllllll
1111111111111111111
a
4
4
cc Ec
Fuip
w
a4
pR
a
a
pR
P
4
f
Sb t N Pr j
Al 027 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
TI11
WALL SECTIONS
J b N
01-05
D ow by
TS
R II
CITY RENEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
D t
10 APRIL 2006
«e yertrcyN p
omomkil
sbh 1. robs M v<Mlzl tiv
STEFAN
ARCM 78C1URE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTt
ASSOCIATE
ruo tram N w
a
i
co
0
2
9-10
2 8
0
G g
_ A
CO—
0
9 10
2 4 —0 4 0. 2 8
YII
0
1111-1111
0
0
om
cO
0
0
4 —Cr
9 0
2
4s
0
co
8
9 10
24 R 0 7
•
gP
El
O'
0
1703
0
21R0686
2
9 0
2
21R 0686
8
CO
.... E...
131 40 4I I:
2
2
9 10
9 —10
1
4
Iniummimm
11I'1111111,11111��
0
g
0
2
'9
9-10
Ca
0
.72
a
9 ID
I_IIIIIIIII_ _
I
1
2
0
9 10
• 2 3 4 84 4 0 2 8
E'I
Sheet No
Al
Project
1 2TILLW27 NOATER RTH MAIN STREET
SMN
11n
STAIRS
Job No
01-06
D own by
Ts
Revisions
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Dote
10 APRIL 2006
iwnq cart ei eo. Non Inn
ciww. a mr�
.0. ma Mat
� � .aALa.
tat
.q.aeeca 0wme.r
STEF-AN
ARCHl1EICTURE LANDSCAPE ARC14ITEC1UR1
ASSOCIATE5.
O
u1
11 1
►►111►1I1111►111111111►1111111111
IIut1,111!111!ulllrlIn
11111111111111111111111111.11
,
;
_ .1111111II!!1,111111!IIII
11 lluua;ulll1Il■ iluriuui>nm111, i l..: 11,. l,llw� l!Irl inulul
•f1T•e.e�
f
�1-.
1111111111
T1IO'
DI' • =1 p!!1 i1611 .,
•iA4''' •i!•. t1.
• -••
I,.
►.�IN III►�•
0
1�,111;; ►,1•III�.;•
!
/baba... ►0•.'0.►pe
eA1P.•. t•11!.Mi
... ..... 4, .•....•••.•....
..,.�•�... p•;•.•;�4
in it 111114 *.
•t:'►:i!IMO,.�.:
1'•'.'-7v.�•�•••��••�•..4
��•�•�W /./ ►C• W�•�Q•�••..i
.4 *4 ►� 11►+
jj ''•� ►Q.
/1• ► r11►e..
11111111111111111�III!1�I■-:I O IIIIIIIIII�I�II I III I Ip111fIIIII�II�IIIIII IIiIWllllllllllllllllllit! TI 101 it
=,11 III I11 I � lil''I■"A
1111 I 1,11111111111111 1 I ��1 �I i IM
911I i1111111111111111 1111 1
—II�1 I11!II IL'II:I lIIf �141161♦=+ — I
Al 2 227 NORTH MAIN STREET
STILLWATER MN
TIt1
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
Job No
01-05
Or w by
TS
Revle o 9
CITY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Dt
10 APRIL 2006
—O
V
IC
1, ada. _ _`14:..;
•�i'.• l'i�i�i11 11`i'.
►0..*'i I) '�� 1i'0�
... �,1.:.11 — 1t.`/
,...�.d 1• •..1 1i l.4 Mit�
4
drab do ry m m qa de
papered , ao
r ma that ar curb d'Y64
„..a. ord. teat
pm Ms .tier. waxr,uu
bev manham
4
a
a
4
4
ARCH
40
STEFAN
IURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ASSOCIATES
�n�: mil iSJi7 ixe""3i1�!
a
_ 138 -0
COPPER
_ 126 -0
COPPER
_ t1a-o
FACE BRICK
_ 100 -0
VENEER STONE
E
90 -0
COPPER
142 -0
- _4.- 9'nlllll!Jy"L411411ni,g01 IGI" IINIi111ITIII IGIIG".1111W1�'ILti1111111'11NII$ 1111111114114111111I f 0R1111111111i0011UIIPGG1I: 1611IG11i1 10CIIIIPPL''lTl1461111I11:RU' IIIIlllPaElilxlIII111111 1�_-•-•- 404•
1ii -
11�mai
- s2:A2�2'
■
N^I I. r.I41VI'I1NI. LII'.
II1111 IIin
mosiroI lull:Iilllllllllllll—��—_MIN _��_� — MINI
-
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIH1111IIIIII
111111111HII IIII III IIf II1iii'
1111111!IIIUI
1111111111111
11111111111111
T11111II 111
" rvti
ctir.-r-ter_-1rz.r.-r.�.nrtir
c r ani ElEYAliON
""1�11 11 1 iii 1 1111
ia'ai'aalii' `v
:=: NIIIIYIICIIIIIIIIIIIr1111111111111111111111111111U11111111111i11
L
LJ
s „g 1s
jR 2�
ar 0
0
U
K
o O a a
3
I V ` N
13 0 0 H p N
z
cn
z
0
Oz
z W
J
W
H
N < 0
�N� UJ
J W
♦—
a V w W
N)
z N.-
6 Q
WAILN SIRLEI
PROPERTY UNE
PROVIDE ACCESS TO
GAS VALVE TYPICAL
BLS
146-0
WATER STREET
MVO
TO ELEV 922 5 FEMA 1929 100 YR
FILL THIS AREATH GRAVEL
FLOOD PIAN
PROVIDE CONC JEOSEY BARRIERS
AT PROPERTY LINE TO RETAIN
FILL FILL TO BE REMOVED AFTER
ELEV CiTITIFICATION
PROPERTY UNE
TAIA FILL PLAN
44979 cow
ALK
WONC
ALK
WAN STREET
4- Ql7S
USING
BUILDING
CONC- WALK
O 0
4- reps o5
O O
PROPERTY UNE
F.----mc[ OF ASPHALT
PROPERTY UNE
RD RCONC. CURB PROP WE
Bo w
ODEMOLfIION PLAN
BELOR1 TO
REBOVE ALL A9'WLI PB5104
RYaE AIL EEW! MADE PPIMO
LAXITIES NG MIXTURES,
OP ALL ML AT PRPLMY va
9 4 7 MinTOaRc 77
wax n R7RI CDT IRO
PROP8HY WC
MAIN STREET
0 BOLLARDS d
GAS REOLIATER
0 0
VOAMP AT PRpSRPI DIE 0
58 -9
0 C+rS ILLS
RCIM ALL ASPA T MARC
RFLOR AL BEIPM (Ara ROC
LAMS AND STRUCTURES,
CAP 74 RAW AT P43RIV LIE
z
LL
0
0
0
zo 0-
Si O o f o O
LIJ
L/'i�J�
L_I_
F—
(1)
z
DEMOLITION PLAN
ITS.
� S/74'
o4
A
Cove
zit
e
04
I — _
�-302 /¢ -DP' 4 11`
th
N
1♦
/
/ T TAi'
o Z o4 (ram
.,6z Jz'_t — -- 9z•
` - -- ¢s06-u --14C04— --
•►
<!/ ter t, / ,'y G ` / .ENO i
4:Srd4 CA'
r\
0
.r
0
///
•
-^ A /7 d 1 'J- A'w
WATER
SO
/
GCS
t`-
.�65. 68
6%
O
W
11'4
o • re._
/Alr _��►
t ,,
//// //////_e/ /_1/��
t� T CT(
..,)
4 31 /)
/"Lzi . Z3 0 ZZ7 Il
STREET
n /67y.7
4
1
♦
ti
o -o
9tf G0 -
— /9044 ---
'i
5
roa Jr - -
xr
.1
1
•
•
t
O
ti
•
A
•
•
,• 4
0I.\,ear.
a
.4 ,:pv9.e• Sr
C, V.41 , 465-' .PEsoc v r/o.4/ 'fC /N ,,oe,r
7¢ O.- Oft �f re,OGE /.Z.?
144
0
►1
r
IR
Memorandum
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
To Heritage Preservation Commission
From Bill Turnblad, Community Development Directo, )
Date Apnl 26, 2006
Re
Croix Capital Group (Liberty West site)
Demolition Public Hearing
Case DEM/06-02
BACKGROUND
Chris Aamodt of Croix Capital Group, Inc has made application to demolish the six
buildings that are located on the property to be developed as Liberty West The property is
located on Manning Avenue Currently there are two lots The southerly lot has a home and
a detached garage, both of which are less than 50 years old and neither structure has
histoncal significance These buildings do not require review by the Hentage Preservation
Commission
The northerly lot has a house and two detached garages Neither of the garages has histoncal
significance, and therefore requires no public review However, portions of this northerly
house are more than 50 years old Therefore staff requested the owner to submit a full
demolition permit application for Hentage Preservation Commission review on this house
ANALYSIS
An application booklet was submitted, which included all of the nine information items
required by Section 34-5 of City Code
(1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property
and with reference to neighborhood properties,
This information is included in the attached booklet
(2) A legal descnption of property and owner of record,
The legal description is included in the booklet The owner of the property is Croix
Capital Group Inc Chris Aamodt is the principal
(3) Photographs of all building elevations,
This information is included in the booklet
(4) A descnption of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be
demolished,
This information is included in the booklet As noted in the booklet the home was
remodeled from an agricultural building into a residence Except for the field stone
foundation under a portion of the home and the massive timer post and beam support
r
Croix Capital Group Demo Permit
Page 2
exposed in the basement there is very little of historical significance associated with
the structure
(5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where
applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition,
This information is satisfactorily presented in the attached booklet
(6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure
to be demolished is located,
This information is satisfactorily presented in the attached booklet
(7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning
requirements,
This information is satisfactorily presented in the attached booklet
(8) A descnption of alternatives to the demolition,
This information is satisfactorily presented in the attached booklet
(9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or
reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible
The house has been listed for sale in the Stillwater Gazetteourier It is
unclear if any offers were made on the home relocation However it . suld not be
surprising if no offers were received since the estimated value . seable materials is
less than the estimated cost of moving the home
ALTERNATIVES
\,/Ps Nsc— PuBa.ts , N CV\ZL (I&
Ate) vgleS wpei Ali 6ri
The Hentage Preservation Commission has several options G, 7„Pop.s t
1 Approve the demolition permit SAvE: - emsv--- vteva
2 Deny the demolition permit Hal ,,�r /8-e ems ,
RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds that the information submittal builds a case that the structure m question is
without sufficient histoncal value to require its reuse or preservation Therefore, staff
recommends Alternative 1
cc Chns Aamodt
Steve Tomten
attachments Location Map
Application booklet
R_IW R_OW RI9W
n_N
T3 IN
T30N
R_ W R2IW FLOW
Vlcmdy Map
Scale in Feet
�i -. . W
SW: w� eV
V�.be N W M new W.
Wsrve WWWW Gown Sur b
f
Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Permit No V Em/oko
Demolition Request Permit Fee $100*
Address of Project I � 43 tU 44" \ _ LI Parcel No 3O0,5907-03 OD/
00002
Lot 1/4A- Block 1/•-‘a Subdivision NA
Applicant Itz.X0_)121-1b.:1-21 �'12J.p ��.� (LL tv2.1-7
AddressrO I� 2 crS Telephone No f p5l - 235 - 7 2 l Z
Owner if different than Applicant
Address Telephone No
Type of Structure Dear .
Age of Structure 3S Condition of Structure 643L--t c.
Intended Use of Site after Demolition c'-� �-``, z s `�
Date
0 t,
Date
*After review and approval of the demolition permit request with the Heritage Preservation Commission, a
building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Building Department The fee for the building
permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project
Office Use Only
HPC Review Date
❑ Approved
City Planner/Community Development Director
❑ Denied
Date
Memorandum
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
To Hentage Preservation Commission
From Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director'T
Date Apnl 26, 2006
Re
American Legion Post No 48
Deck and Parking Lot Improvements
Case DR/06-1
BACKGROUND
David Swanson has submitted a Design Review application on behalf of the American Legion Post
No 48, which is located at 103 South 3rd Street The Amencan Legion recently purchased the
parking lot abutting their building on the lower east side and would like to construct a deck there
They would also like to provide off-street parking for the residents of the second floor apartments
and a -few extra spaces for members or employees
ANALYSIS
The proposed wooden deck is planned to be constructed on the southeast portion of the Legion
building Dimensions of the deck would be 25 feet by 50 feet Improvements would include a new
door with sidelights from the lounge area to the deck a new 150 by 65 ' window to match the
existing window, new extenor wall lights brick wall and lattice work under the deck, shrubbery
around the deck and parking lot and paving of the parking lot Details of the improvements are
presented in the attachments
Design Manual Guidelines
The property is located within the City s histonc downtown commercial distract Consequently
the design standards found in the "Design Manual, Commercial Histonc Distract, Stillwater,
Minnesota apply to the property The portions of the manual that seem to apply to the proposal
are reviewed below
1 Parking
a Parking areas should be screened from the street and the sidewalk either by walls or
plantings or both If walls are used their material should be compatible with the
walls of existing adjacent buildings Walls should be at least 18 high
i Shrubbery is proposed along the Myrtle Street side of the parking lot The
type of shrubbery proposed grows between three to six feet tall at matunty
The Legion should keep this trimmed so it does not grow much over four feet
tall, otherwise all view is blocked off from pedestnan traffic
2 Rear Entrances
a The rear facade entrance should be clean and well maintained and present a
welcome appearance A small sign awnings display windows and planter boxes can
improve appearance
Page 2
American Legion
i The rear door is not intended as a public entrance It would serve as an exit
from the building to the deck None the less, the rear facade is currently very
utilitarian without architectural articulation Some type of treatment would
add to the character of the rear facade Additional windows and a door are
proposed, this together with the decorative wall lights will help
3 Color
a The color palette standards found in the manual are specifically related to buildings
new or renovated They are not specifically intended for accessory structures None
the less the guidelines should be applied fpractical
i A specific color scheme has not been submitted yet Generally, the Legion is
proposing a wood deck with color that would complement the existing brick
of the building
4 Lighting
a A coordinated lighting plan should be submitted Lighting fixtures should be
concealed or integrated into the overall design of the project The light source
should be hidden from direct pedestrian or motorist view
i Currently a parking lot light exists along the edge of the legion property
This will provide the majority of the light to the deck In addition, decorative
carnage lights are proposed to be installed on the wall along the deck This
can be seen in the attached photograph The proposed fixtures will have faux
candles that will be directly visible However given their location on the
southeast corner of the building, they should not be perceived as glaring
either by motorists or pedestrians passing by on Myrtle Street
ALTERNATIVES
The Heritage Preservation Commission has several options
1 Approve the design review application
2 Approve the design review application with modifications or conditions
3 Deny the design review application
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Alternative 2 with the following conditions
1 A proposed color palate for the improvements is to be submitted and approved by the
Community Development Director if authonzed by the Hentage Preservation
Commission
2 A detailed site plan is to be submitted together with the building permit application It
will have to show at least the surveyed lot lines, existing building location, proposed
improvement location (including stairways), curb cut and dnve aisle for the parking lot
cc David Swanson
Jeff Ous
Attachments Picture of existing rear elevation
Letter from applicant
Application packet
Design details
A VILRICAN LEGION POS i NO 48
103 South Third Street
March 17, 2006
Heritage Preservation
City of Stillwater
AND
Phone 439 1435
LEGION CLUB
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
American Legion Post 48 recently purchased the dirt parking lot to the east of our present
building with the intent to provide some off street parking and to prevent a high-rise type
building being built alongside of our building The parking lot is to be paved in early
May of 2006
We would like to build a 25'X50' deck or patio along side of our building on the SW
corner of our lot and abutting our building on the SE
If we build a deck we would have the colonng closely match our bnck On the other
hand if we build a concrete patio we would have the concrete stained to closely match the
bnck If we decide to go with a concrete patio we would probably have decorative
wrought iron railings
We are investigating the cost of both options and time is of the essence if we are to have
the project completed for our summer season
G7'v"-f--t`��AJ C2444 471 L
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM Case No
Date Filed
Receipt No
Fee: $25.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting
material (i e photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the
property of the City of Stillwater Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is
required
Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required
All following information is required
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
o0,2.o 42 0(06
or '
Address of Project 10 I 3 r- 5f -5 Assessor's Parcel No „,62 030.z0 la (Dios-
Zoning District =-� 7 Description of Project in detail 1v Pa (Required)�/
� P J r-k r h y/�� 4n.,/
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be
true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and
used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required
Property Ownerl ekie (e-9ra /o_ci
Mailing Address t o 3 `3(A4 S( 5
City State Zip ((v z iL) 5503'.Z
Telephon o 65-0 4/3
Signature
(Required)
H \mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit wpd
July 13, 2005
Representative n ava 5 Gca vi,s 0 v�
Mailing Address l03 3 54, S-
ay State Zip 5/ 11 cvQ��� /i ,c, 5 5c3.Z
Telephon o a i i, 113 _li-/3 S
Signature o.tu�
(Required)
Page 3
American Legion
-1 1
3rd Street
Myrtle Street
Existing r,
Building
C
O ' —
q�Y
4
err
I1�F
qr
Parking Lot
Stillwater American Legion
103 So Third St Stillwater MN
East Lot Concept
13 April 2006
1
99
s
50
►.
50
Existing
Building:
50,
1-- 25
25 ---►�
Retaining Wall
184'LX18"H
Door,
Commercial
42"
Window, Qty 2
150" X 65"
Deck
50X25 Wood
Stillwater American Legion
103 So Third St Stillwater MN
East Lot Concept
24 April 2006
50'X25' Wood Deck, 42" Full Glass, Commercial Door with Sidelights,
75" X 65" Window (Qty2), 184' Retaining Wall, Approximately 18 " High
Landscaped, Parking Area Blacktop
Stillwater American Legion
103 So Third St Stillwater MN
East Elevation Concept
24 April 2006
50'X25' Wood Deck, 42" Full Glass, Commercial Door with Sidelights,
75" X 65" Window (Qty2), 184' Retaining Wall, Approximately 18 " High
Landscaped, Parking Area Blacktop
Stillwater American Legion
103 So Third St Stillwater MN
East Elevation Concept
24 April 2006
Style
Type
Material
Color / Finish
Glass Type
Dimensions
Traditional
Bracket, Wall
Brass, Glass
Patina
Beveled, Clear
9"Wx21"Hx11"ext
Stillwater American Legion
103 So Third St Stillwater MN
Preliminary Lighting Detail
24 April 2006
Yew, ` Greenwave'
Growth Rate: Slow growth rate
Light requirements: Full Sun, Partial Sun and shade
Plant Group: Shrub
Plant Type: Evergreen
Plant Zone: Zone 4, Zone 5, Zone 6, Zone 7
Size at Maturity: 3 - 6 ft
Stillwater American Legion
103 So Third St Stillwater MN
Preliminary Landscaping Detail
24 April 2006
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
iP
Y
1
rj
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER LETTER 1
LOCATION IN STILLWATER 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3
PHOTOGRAPHS - EXTERIOR 4 - 5
PHOTOGRAPHS - INTERIOR 6
DESCRIPTIONS 7
PROPOSED PLANS 8 - 13
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ZONING 14
ALTERNATIVES 15
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
SIIlIWATER, MN 55082
PHONE (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
COVER
CLRTIflCATI ON
I b.eay •.a v,,. d. Ad. a.. nd by.e
mdu err d and Jut d . MA
.L....d Prof...ewl L .. . A=am: .edu Jr
k.. A J. Stew. e! M:.em.e
Rime. H.c Pam.
Des
LA -mu uan
D/1GNLD DRAWN
VtP RT
DAT`
DESIGNED
CHECKED
mums '4/13/06
TRANSMITTED
O 2005 PU1MAN DIANX!NG 8 DESIGN
mT6 gamut de wad Is.. amma...d
am®m#—me and&a dam a. Seam n•
pyq V Madame. lac( 8 a �VDBUdd
S..., Camaro law M min me f.....ed
m De m mcarom adau mama. I:m
9A D0'. Aeao-am.e
C• - NIUMbLR
• CA12ARCHITLCTU P—
• L.AhU MI —A MAMG
• RG-11CCINF1ALOGJIGI
ARCHITLCTURAL LLU. T at T•ON
• GRARIIC OLIIGI
VUTMAN •
PLANNING
& DESIGN.
v. (made Dam. Vaal • Il.4m. if. • e.eei
.Am. ()1M-MM • im (nda Aa.
Me* rm..ewemmadm
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Mr Bill Turnblad
Community Development Director, City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
13 April, 2006
Dear Bill,
Please accept the enclosed information as our submittal to the Hentage Preserva-
tion Commission for a Demolition Plan Review We have responded to the nine
points required in the ordinance in the order they are presented Please include
our case on the agenda of the May HPC meeting
The existing site for the Liberty West project consists of two lots, each with an
existing residence and a detaced garage The south lot contains a rambler with
a detached garage, both built in the 1970's The north lot also contains a house
along with two detached garages The garages were built in the 1970's, however,
some portions of the house were built earlier It is difficult to determine the exact
age of the home, so we are providing you with all the information we have
If you, or any members of the Commission, would like to visit the property,
please give me a call and a tour of the site can be arranged
If you have any questions, comments, or desire additional information, do not
hesitate to contact me
Respectfully submitted,
Roger Tomten
Sr Design Assoc
Putman Planning and Design, Inc
ifeigeWeigna
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC
01RISMMODT PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 55082
PFIONE (651) 235-7' 1
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
cb - .ya.,c� , , r
COVER
LETTER
co I lady * do dm. m P.M"
ado my dam madam ad dm I ® el*
Pakumad Lam,. oda dm
4... o off d. Sua of Mamma
Neer W. Pmam
Mae
D�rIGN=D DRAWN
MP RT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAW\
TRANSMI1TFD
4/13/06
C.I.]rl iLN—•.
0 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING 8 DESIGN
016 d a de e0 tarn yam d
...lama d way ads damn d e imp �
npa d Pam m...a, a Dad, lw.D)
ed.e a �m..d
I.Do my copy m Adam aka mammy ism
IVISD-D01 dm lay
A
A
0
oOb NUMb�F2
JTh5 T Olr
1
• LANDfC,IT_ /.'!Cr1ITLCT r
• LAND rLt.NNLVG
•:!JIDLN Ti/.L MIL/1GN
• /.lCY'ITLC r J'!AL LLUITR/. 1ON
• G!• ..SIC D•✓1G�'
1. A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its
CROIX CAPITAL property and with reference to neighboring properties;
GROUP, INC.
CHRLS AAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
S1ILLWATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
PROJf=CT
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
migaguagemp
LOCATOR
MAP
CERTIFICATION
I kenbr < mh do rho plan . pmpenmd bb
oedn q direct .opm.tme re.b d .r I .m . dolt
<
Li.ced'Prof... ul Lae rnmtin
A.n under <
I... ofrsr Store of Mleonou
Syon.re
New Marc Domes
Den
L«ve ueel
DL/IGNLO DRAWN
MP, RT
DATE
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
0 2005 PUTMAN DLANNNG & DESIGN
-n. L..q. rk <. R Imo. yombryortz
tspv.VM 1... A::
—I md.: k e from
PDLD-DDI .. dm� abc.<
RLV I/IONt
COS NUMbLR
•_nN,,,.i^.nit ARCHITECTURE
• LAND PiJANNING
• I[[JIDGN"IAL OGJIGN
• ARCHITECTURAL LLUJ ATNJN
• GtAITYIC O^11GTN
'PITMAN
PLANNING
& DESIGN . R�
py Rortr.d. 6:.e. Nod • ryoAeos VI • Ioo+S
OK. *IrrhiblItt0 ' de.
E M..I pybll.p.e..., r - ..
. far..glm.l..dAr.`.a
DELLVOOD
OAKDALE
44
War
W.Ldkeldnd
TW..
u-p.
Wisconsin
EXISTING' SETTING
1
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT:
NOTE: SITE PLANNING SEEKS TO RETAIN MAJOR SPECIMEN TREES AND GROUPS OF EXISTING
DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES.
2 A legal descnption of property and owner of record,
4,x
to I,
9 J1
1/
wine
sM
- PARCEL A
/
E
L °0tp a
579 ye
--
5 NL
LE30
&1R17[vG !
I
Sufi_ JI
/
//
Py4
44
/
/
/
E 5
BuRON
4/,g 0
l '6.0005i F
PARCEL B
et
\002824 E
60 00
/
—20 0O
00 47 08 H
40 80
NORTH
CAI 60062 ypli 010
Gopher State One Call
5*1 Ore MLA 651J5 -0032
TOL 600 S 66
-
EASEMENTS
THESE PARCEL ARE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EASMENTS
1 HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 231 OF DEEDS PAGE 231 THIS
EASEMENT COVERS THE WESTERLY 50 OOF FEET OF PARCELS A & 8
2 NSP EASEMENT PER BOOK 202 OF DEEDS PAGE 541 NO
DOCUMENT AVAILABLE
3 SUBJECT INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE LEGAL
DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL 8 THIS EASEMENT IS ABIGUOUS BECAUSE
THERE 15 NO WIDTH OF THE STRIP
AREA
PARCEL A 217 798 5Q FT 5 00 ACRES
PARCEL B 121 940 SQ FT 2 80 ACRES
OVERALL 339 738 5Q FT 7 80 ACRES
VICINITY
MAP
26
SITE
CITY OF SIILLWATEO MINNESOIA
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL A (I gal d pt p ded by C o Cap tal
G p)
All that part of the So thw t 1 /4 f th 5o the st 1 /4
5 ct o 30 T w sh p 30 N rth Ra g 20 W t 1 the 4th
P I [Ipal M di desc Ibed as follows Commencl g at the
Southwest of s d Section 30 thence North 00 deg s
45 minutes 54 seco ds West g Id bearing Minnesota State
C dl t Sy t m So th Zoe (ec d dasN rth 00
deg s 37 m to 00 seco ds East) alo g the West II e of
d 5 thw t 1/4 f th So thw 1 1 /4 d t f 390 00
feet th 5 th 89 d g ee 31 ml t 26 seco d Ea t
( ded So th 88 d g e 07 m t 32 seco d East)
d t of 385 00 feet th N rth 00 d g ee 28 m to
34s ods East ( od da H rth01dg es52m t 28
e o d Eat) d t o f 60 00 f t the N rth 18
deg 02 m t 04 ec d E t ( ded N rth 19
d g 25 m t 58 ec d E O d t f 160 00 feet
to the p t f beg' g f th p I t be d bed th
N rth 73 d g e 41 m tes 36 seco ds West ( eco ded a
N rth 72 d g 17m to 42 s o ds W 6) d t f
210 30 feet th N rth 59 d g 16 mi t 08 ec d
W st ( eco ded as North 57 deg ees 52 m tes 10 seco ds
West) a d sta ce of 277 77 feet to th We t I e of said Sect o
30 th N rth 00 d gre 46 min t s 54 sec d West
alo g s dW t 1 d t f 310 53 feet th N rth
89 d g 13 m t 06 ec d E t ell tan f 550 88
feet the 5 th 11 d g s 32 ml t 29 seco d W t
d t f 529 72 f t t th po t f beg g
d
PARCEL B (I g I d pt o p d el by C Cap t I
G p)
At t f 1 d th 5 thw t Q rt f th 5 thwe t
d rt f 5 t 30 T w h p 30 N rth Rag 20 W t
Wash gt Co ty M t d (bed as f 'low
Comm 1 g t th o thwe t c !Sect 30 th nc
N rth 00 d g 37 m t 00 ds Ea 1 1 rg th
we t dy l f 5 a o 30 di to of 390 00 feet I th
poi t of beg g the c So th 8B deg ee 07 m nutes 32
d E t d t f 385 00 f t the N rth 01
d g e s 52 m ut 28 eco d East a d stone of 60 00 fe t
th c N th 19 degre 25 m tes 58 seco d East
d t of 160 00 f t th N rth 72 deg ees 17 mi tes
42 d W t d t 1210 30 f t the N rth 57
d g 52 m 1 10 d W t d t f 277 77 feet
t a poi t o the weste ly II a of Sect o 30 thence So th 00
d g 37 m( tes 00 seco ds West alo g the westerly 11 of
5 t 30 dl t f 410 00 feet to th po t f beg g
T g ih with .m t fo g e s d g s ove eh
f II w gt t Ast p fl d th d of pe pe die 1
t dp II I w th th foil w g d abed e t I
Comme c g at th so thwest co ne of Sect o 30 Township
30 N rth Ra g 20 W t th ce North alo g the west II e f
Section 30 a distance of 390 00 feet the ce South 88 deg ees
07 m t 32 d E t d t of 385 00 feet t the
po t f beg g th N rth 01 deg ees 52 m utes 28
c d E t d t f 60 00 f t th N rth 19 deg
25 m1 t 58 d E ta di to ce of 160 00 feet the
N rth 72 d g 17 m t 42 d W t d tans f
210 30 feet th N rth 57 d g ees 52 mi tes 10 sec d
West a d st e of 277 77 feet 1 th w st line f Sect 30
The I st North Iy a seme 1 II a to be extended to the west
II fSe t 30 Th 1 t th lyeas m min to be
e to ded 1 the we t l f 5 t 30 e cept h ghway
m t tl htm d dw y h II bededc t d
t d pt dbyth p blcatwhchtm sadeasem twll
C
SYMBOLS
MANHOLE
G CULVERT
FENGASCE ELECRIC HOOKUP
CONCRETE
DENOTES FOUND
1/2 IRON PIPE
o DENOTES SET I /2 IRON
PIPE MARKED RLS 25718
TO BE SET
O CATCH BASIN
4 HYDRANT
SIGN
WATER VALVE
UTILITY POLE
LIGHT POLE
❑ TELE/ELEC BOX
GAS VALVE
OVERHEAD WIRES
es. WELL
LIBERTY CROIX CAPITAL
W EST GROUP, INC
/ CONTACT
11,11
CHRIS AAMODT
CROIX CAPITAL GROUP
502 SECOND STREET #301
HUDSON WI54016
COUNTY/CITY
wA5111NGTON
COI_ IVTY
ITY O F
S I ILLWATEFt
SEAL
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DOLS NOT
REQUIRE A SEAL
CERTIFICATION
h by Ify hhl pl wa p pa d
n
by m 0 y 01 peg Ion nd
h I m d lyylrp eel Land Survey°
of MINNESOTA
IL Th m R
D 11 21 05
C REVISIONS
P
DATE REVISION
1 1 21 05 EXISITNG CONDmONS
/
7143 .3. 71 3S
MANNING AVE N
CHRIS AAMODT PRINCIPAL.
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
ST➢ LWATER, MN 55082
PHONE (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
= .n•w.L,V66:'era-ax• 6
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION
CLRTIFTvTION�
16te8e ee.dr w mee s dt dw ,l.. meted be
we.tr•I -et.e4Madwlme deli
Ltsd Dmht..l Lase, A Saw, mot th.
L.. a the Sue d Wmem..
5apew
Hoc Ile Puss
Dar
hams orbs
ID. L '(CNLD DRAWN
AMEIdT
MP RT
25718 •
PROJECT LOCATION
P I D #3003020330001
P I D #3003020330002
Sute#B100
200 East Chest et Street
Sellwete MN 55082
Phone 651 275 8969
Fa 651 275 8976
dh-csis@
mdeod set
CORNERSTONE
LAND SURVEYING INC
FILE NAME SURVPPO1
PROJECT NO PP05001
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMI1IEO
4/13/06
pmA�2r� alerla�
0 2005 PUTMAN PLSNAING & DESIGN
m16 Lmse . wt4P (am, eawemm t1d
psi d d�Rs:. t .�laPpe 8D1
D..d.eme u tr..... It w ud
MOOdew Sem uvrW .� wuma If.
A
A
0
UCs NUMf�LR1
•Lt. DJC: t.5Cr:iZC
•
•,6Jir:..VCTt OA
• :rt .cnm_Cr.JR nL LL L1ViTR:.T10,4
O:JiC f
reEfaraffinile 3. Photographs of all
CROIX CAPITAL building elevations;
GROUP, INC.
CHRISAAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
5111.WATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
Me..0.7L
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PHOTOGRAPHS
EXTERIOR
cre-nricn-rioN
Smummu
Num, Mu: Putman
DRAWN
MP, RT
DESIGNED •
CHECKED
DRAWN 4/1 3/06
TRANSMITTED
gliWKWIRIO
0 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN
41•0:0 Iti. 4, :=4
moritial proci...Pro twao •
tn; elijit maimed- tj""
mu IN we coy a eke copop. *kw per* Imm
W6001)1 elm. eitan
.7015 NUM6fV.
I 4 II
1
• LAND/CAM- AITC1,17-CTURG.
• LAND In-ANNING
• II.G-110e—NT1AL De --"MN
• APROI,TP_C-r1-11TAL ILLU./TRATION
• GrtAMIICDt—/GN
PUTMAN I
PLANNING
& 'DESIGN
mtu *mfr.& Dive 410.1•• Httimm VI • itimi
ylmmt (,)slattiat
t Slusl p.smunt•mmucum.•
mmmuylauum.mt4Mmt.- uum
South elevation of the home in it's setting, including the large oak tree to the
right.
South elevation
Southwest corner of the house. To the left, the eastern portion of the detached
garage.
Southeast elevation.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
East elevation.
West elevation.
North elevation.
Close-up of the west addition,
south elevation.
C11010111111111111111111111111
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CIARISAAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (651)235-7212
litiggill11111111111
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PAhIhIuuIIIIIL1_
PHOTOGRAPHS
EXTERIOR
CLRTIrICATION
I iterMy cart& Jot dm plea vaa bY
avia m Mem mmomm md Mat I ma a fiM
Lammed Paardemoom, Lmacam rfofacf ardef thr
Lava ,) Saafa of ...mot.
Sam..
Neat Mac Dames
Dar
bccat
QNLID DRAWN
MP, RT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
CCDP,""FF
4/13/06
0 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN
=pm dc eaall ara arfammaft sad
*mama"( van ad de dams la a 4...64,
caraelded pe Pram Naas & Deep D) •
Dszli=o) L;Wellez. 6c 020. 0,.i..apstecad.1. Unita
m. De re cedy e. dice .P1M1,
M4D.001 bat can
D015 NUM151T,
• LAND/CAR— AIMCHITLCTURRL
• LAND "1—ANNING
• IICR—/IDP—N,1AL Dt—,1)2N
• a!)&Q,IMOTLOIMAI_ I_LUTTAMON
• AC Of—rION
PUTMAN
PLANNING
& IDESIGN
acat 1)&lc Naga • Hake.) VI • ace)
(7,01.1.• ' (dff)).
t Vat ameketmasia
eveammvImvciaddc),
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
cHRIS AAMODT- PRWGPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (6511235.7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PHOTOGRAPHS
INTERIOR
CG. TIr1CATION
I hereby ern+ that dos pion pp
atamd by or o,
undo. y due .apu.wo. end Jat I a a dely
lmceed �mlo�. al bum.,rnn
Aueender dr
low, al thr Saof Mlaeso..
Spars,
Nast. 4em Damao
Dam
Lmaen wet
D�tiG'Vt_D OfeA— N
MP, RT
DITL
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
O 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN
- That ohms. tie smell for. anony
m, aril
traypossos a sd h rrrks .r., o. e limp
op. pAmd a s. P eny of Gymo oc,♦ 8 Nay. (W8Ui
• opriof D. n e.. :DDI) .ord hl Jnnrd
Fur. Lcpy+.N Lro A; ry&u morrrd
� Da aar ropy a. rdloto pr ...tA,,,t p.,.,..p,. hen
PP&C DDI of Omit ek r
006 NUM66f!
• LAND/CAI . /SRCI-ITLC-URL
• LAND MI-ANNM[i
• PtL/1DLNTIAL Ot/10N
• ARCHITLCTlfl AL LLUITRATON
•GIAI TICDL/C1,1
'PUTMAN
PLANNING
& DESIGN.
E Malt pasta* .p. •
oyum.yYsynndey, ,...
A. First floor framing exposed from the base-
ment.
B. First floor post and beam exposed in the
basement.
C. Exposed concrete and field stone founda-
tion wall with brick tase of chimney.
D. Main level stair case.
E. Kitchen.
F. Upper level hallway.
G. Typical upper level bedroom.
D.
A.
E.
•
B.
F.
C.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
4. A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished;
The building is a one and a half story structure, rectangular floor plan with a gabled roof. The ridge of the roof runs
the long axis of the building and the slope is fairly shallow (approx. 6:12). The structure sits on a foundation of
concrete and field stone on a sloping site. The west foundation wall, one of the long walls, is a walk -out condition,
and is a wood frame wall. Reports from the previous owner and visual evidence indicates that water penetrates
the foundation. The layout and grading of the site would indicate that surface run-off is directed toward the house
from the east.
The main floor framing is exposed in the basement and consists of timber posts and beams with dimension floor
framing members. The remainder of the structure would appear to be wood framing with wide exposure hori-
zontal lap siding. The windows are double -hung, one over one units, with single pane glass and aluminum storm
units. The sloped roofs are finished with asphalt shingles. The interiors consist of sheet rock walls and ceilings,
carpet and vinyl floor finishes, with minimal wood trim.
The long east wall contains a one story porch addition with a shed roof. The west wall, or walk -out wall, contains
a two-story addition with a flat roof that provides access from the second floor. The site also contains two detached
garages with a shallow 4:12 pitch. The additions and the garages all appear to be less than fifty years old (based on
a site plan dated 1969).
The house does not convey any definitive architectural style. The previous owner has indicated that the structure
was remodeled into a house from an agricultural building of some sort. The 1969 survey shows just the rectangular
home structure and a barn that has since been removed from the property.
5. The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the
reason, including where applicable, data sufficient to establish any
economic justification for demolition;
The structure sits on a parcel that was master planned as part of the
Liberty on the Lake development. Prior to platting, two parcels were
removed from the plat. The south parcel (Parcel B on Page 3) contains a
rambler with a detached garage that was built in the 1970's. The north
parcel, (Parcel A on Page 3) the one we are addressing with this demoli-
tion review, also contains a house and two detached garages. The ga-
rages were built in the 1970's, however, some portions of the house were
built earlier. It is difficult to determine the exact age of the home, so we
are providing all the information we have. The previous property owner
indicated verbally that parts of the home included an old grainary. The
only evidence of such may be seen from the basement level where foun-
dation walls and wood framing are exposed.
The lots have now been sold and are planned to become a part of the
Liberty neighborhood. A preliminary plat approval for Liberty West was
granted by the City Council in January of 2006.
The site contains much more dramatic topography and tree cover than
was found throughout most of the Liberty project. Thus, a main concern
of the developer and the city, was the preservation of several large heri-
tage trees and the incorporation of the rolling topography into the plan.
It became apparent early on that the topography, the location of heritage
trees and the location of the existing home were not compatible. In order
to loop the road from Planting Green to Tending Green (see attached
plat map) and avoid several of the large heritage trees, the road and road
right-of-way impacted the house site. (See map on page 13) Any revision
of the road layout to save the house site would mean the loss of large
heritage trees. The existing house site is also extremely close to the low
elevation point of the site. This means that storm ponding required for
the site would also impact the existing house location.
Relocation of the house on the site was also considered. However, the
zoning of the area, Cottage Residential, produces smaller houses on
smaller lots. This demands custom home designs, especially as it relates
to the street front of the home (narrow end toward the street), and the
taming of the garage. With this criteria, based on the Liberty neighbor-
hood, which was based on old Stillwater neighborhoods, the remodel-
ing of the home to a new site, the redesign necessary to properly fit the
neighborhood and the topography rendered the reuse of the structure
impracticle. That, in concert with the fact that the structure is not archi-
tecturally significant in any given style or period, lead us to look only at
removal through demolition or relocation off -site.
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
DESCRIPTIONS
CLRTIP—ICA ON
I S.wlr mitlr do t. rl.. .- roomed b r a
min gAwe .r..a..remlr.d{
Loccosed P..I...mal loco Adam edge de
1....f de Sme dIhmemos.
Ns 14r Prm
Dar tiCal=.cbl
MP RT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
O 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN
w11,. dams. .ovrrell lo...evenee. esti
.ram d "andd.w "rpaDr-
f7„7" U
S.. .m .em,.,..a Do on cop, . dim COPY.. .di.•
WBD•DDI . d.,, abaft
rs
HOC INJUI"111.2
E
a
WWWWWIR
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC
GIRISAAMODT PRINCIPAL
6428MANNING AVE NORM
5T1L1WATER, MN 55082
PHONE (651) 235-721
PROJECT,
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
R
PROPOSED
PLANS
CLRTIFICATIONL
I baby a.y do dw oldwe waled by ma
odes .y don ygn.wm sad d I as d.y
Eland Prolsolos..I Loma. M7.. the
.
d la.Sew .fTltarww.
Mar Me P.
Din
lb= win
DL/IGNLD DRAWN
MP RT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
0 2005 PUTAIA\ PLANNING 8 DESIGN
.TW 4n4 d. r8 I.n opera d
dd.vmta d a.o d dad &ado n d.d err dd
cay.� d (DDrO woad CI
sum cmntN V. u �.Eu a �
1A8DUDI Ate, dV ona dam 'wean free
I 887a►El rl l�—it��.
•L \W/C,'.rt- _
• LAND: J.NNING
• !...:JL7 NT.:L D•JIGN
:..'!C.'�ITLCTUR.•.L LLVrT!AIION
:G•
-
6 Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or
structure to demolished is located,
This narrative provides explanations of the following planning and design exhibits that comprise the
Preliminary Plat and General Development Plan for Liberty West, a Planned Unit Development
The site consists of two lots, 5 0 acres and 2 8 acres that border Manning Avenue (County Highway
15) on the west and the Liberty on the Lake neighborhood on the north, east and south The charactenstics
of the site are quite different from the predevelopment charactenstics of the adjacent land now in the
Liberty on the Lake neighborhood The site is heavily wooded with several large Red Oak and Maple trees
in excess of 36 inches in diameter, and clusters of Red Pine that reach over 50 feet high The topography
vanes from slightly rolling in the south and southeast, and transforms to more severe slopes across the
north half of the site It is these charactenstics that require more care and attention in transforming and
blending the area into the adjacent neighborhoods How do we take an existing heavily wooded site with
severe topography and transform it into a neighborhood on par with the adjacent Liberty on the Lake
neighborhood9
PROCESS We started with a detailed study of the existing topography and a tree map of all the
trees on the site Three Red Oak hentage trees were identified on the northern half of the site Along with
another Oak just off the property to the east, they provide a framework of site design In order to preserve
these trees, grading and disturbance of the site beneath their canopies will be minimized to the greatest
extent possible Along the south property line several rows of Red Pine create a border to the adjacent
properties Along the west edge of the site, the topography and mature vegetation provides a natural buffer
to Manning Avenue The existing topography established the location in the northwest corner for on -site
ponding to maintain stormwater on the site With these natural guidelines we set about to integrate housing
sites and road/trail connections as delicately as possible
Numerous on -site visits provided feedback on concepts from the underlying land -owner, City
Planning Commission members, Park Board members, the Community Development Director and
neighbonng property owners
ZONING & GUIDELINES The development is proposed as a Planned Unit Development using
the city's Cottage Residential zoning, the same zoning that is applied to adjacent properties to the south
and east A Home Owners Association will be formed to manage and maintain properties of common use
Design Guidelines will be established that reflect the quality and design requirements of the Liberty on the
Lake neighborhood
STREET NETWORK Liberty West will tie into the existing street network and street width
requirements of the Liberty on the Lake development The sidewalk system from Liberty on the Lake
will be continued and enhanced through the Liberty West project The sidewalks from Planting Green and
Tending Green will be connected and continued through four alternative routes to the north/south trail
proposed along Manning Avenue Grouped mailboxes will continue the "unintentional neighbonng" created
in the Liberty on the Lake neighborhood
PARK SETTING In contrast to the typical circumstance where a park area is set aside, apart from
the rest of the neighborhood, at the proposed future Liberty West, the "park" is one with the neighborhood
Having provided large play fields elsewhere within Liberty, and an extensive trail and sidewalk system,
including numerous park -greens, Liberty West adds another dimension to the connected amenities of
Liberty Preserved specimen oak, pine and maple trees are entwined with water features and boulevard
tree -lined streetscapes Sidewalks and trails, linked to all of Liberty, connect to the trail system along Hwy
15, and extend back, all the way to the trail along Long Lake The requisite storm water ponding
is enhanced converted to a park feature, by waterfalls and crossed by footpaths and footbridges
Sitting areas focus on the shelter of these canopy trees and the interesting views and sounds of the
water features
SETBACKS The very deep 100' setback from Hwy 15's 220' wide right of way, has been
adopted, based on another project, after Liberty was built The goal of this new regulation was to
buffer homes from Hwy 15 The Planned Unit Development provision allows creative planning and
design to accomplish the goal of such an ordinance, but being able to offset the negative effects of
such imposed standards The diagonal orientation of the homes, the extensive tree preservation, the
water features, the use of retaining walls to preserve more trees are all the result of the application
of this P U D mechanism
HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Washington County Highway Department is proposing
to improve Hwy 15 It has or wants a right of way dedication of 110' both sides of the centerline
of the existing highway However, even though most of the homes and most of the mature trees are
on the east side of the existing highway, their most current proposal is to shove the excavation and
construction/destruction and noise, disproportionately, to the east side
This is the result on the Hwy Department's insistence on retaining a very wide ditch section
on the west side of the right of way, while using a curb/"urban" section on the east side We learned
that the Grant side of the right of way, that also has, for some time, in their earlier designs, shown a
trail, has now had the trail eliminated This resulted, we were told, in a savings of some $ 1 million
At the same meeting, we were told that the replacement of the ditch section, with a curb section (the
type anticipated for use on the Stillwater side) would add $300,000 in construction cost, with an
added $300,000 for added right of way to handle added storm water run off storage It seems clear
that the savings of eliminating the trail on the Grant side will more than offset the cost of the curb
section, and any storm storage lands needed
Most important, the damage imposed by the highway improvement could be thus, more
logically and fairly allocated equally on the Grant and the Stillwater sides of the right of way The
result will be the preservation of a mature stand of coniferous overstory and deciduous overstory
trees, some 40 years in the making The setting that each driver, each day, using the new, widened
highway, will view A woods, potentially preserved, because a ditch, was at last, seen as less
valuable than this stand of beautiful, mature trees Trees, that will better buffer the added traffic
noise for all of Liberty residents
The highway lanes, shown on the proposed preliminary site plan, are thus centered within
the nght of way, with the narrowest width of construction disturbance possible We hope that the
Planning Commission, Park Board and City Council will support this location, and the use of curb
and gutter on both sides of the "linear parkway" (As a reference point, the existing power line poles
are shown on the site plans and perspective images) Our plans with the centered highway lanes
could leave these poles and power line in place Thus, the cost of moving this power line could be
saved, and much of the mature vegetation behind could be preserved
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Liberty West represents:
• a three dimensional planning challenge to site designers and home builders;
• an unusual approach to site grading and engineering;
• an upfront time and money consuming challenge to the developer;
• a unique design and development approach to the city.
However, in the end, the goal of maintaining the existing character, topography and vegetation will create
a unique and beautiful place unequalled in the area.
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRISAAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 5C4182
PHONE (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PROPOSED
PLANS
IL..i,..b i.dels pia.,.s.44 m:
.An req •r..p.an.. r do I en a 41.
Lased TN,I,rs..l Ionmq. Ad*. - i
Ian eE d. Sane el Norma
gym"
err
Ileac ..4
MP, RT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
0 2005 DUTMAN PUNNING & DESIGN
Wine 4.m. de anal Iota s d
m,=,rae { d p�m.. � szr
D_ar U—Il—r•aeaE 4 R:ad
HMD0.D elm;
l s�s'. die a.l.. wise roan. !me
AV. OAR .WfTT
0015 Nur1
•L ND/GAT- nRCn!TLC'la[t
• LANO MANNING
• IlL.".D^_NTIAL Ot-J101,1
•^ITLCTLIIT LU/TRAT:ON
• .I OLAGN
UTVIAN
NNING
DESIGN_ . _,
(mold: Dn.. Vad • Hd.u.. VI • t.we
(7.5)16.04, Ia. (r1�f�A{t4
Yyi mae.•ga¢.bm m •
laIENOIMINI11111111
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 55082
PHONE(651)235-7212
OCT
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PROPOSED
PLANS
CL.M111-1CATION
I hereby comfy Wm skis piss am pupated by ate ot
owlet my dart worm.. mid that I an • ask
Llsomma Prokteteasal Tomcat:a Acottact sotim tot
ism of tht State of Mimeo.
biastratt
Newt Hart Nom
Dmt
aask
DZGD DAL-JN
MP, RT
ID A 'IT_
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
0 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESICA
=Tits &am, tie omen fora arbmsomm sad
ampntioli 14 gam esti it sleatant tke estr
P""tr62t*f tt7 rItr: PM. rilaptt'oi
5ntsbt NOk
ms Do so. otos ea save atattas monatts
PP&DtDDI st clam Wow
.11
Jo NUribt_FT
PUTMAN
PLANNING
& IDESIGN
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STILLWATER, MN 550FP
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PROPOSED
PLANS
.I. w Mom.r..wa .d s. I an . 4y «
Loomed I Lora,. A.M.= r.. .
Km of dm Sm. Minasor.
Nova • Um • h m
DM.
MP, RT
h� .Ai
11111111111111
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
:4/13/06
WINEWNIONIS
0 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN
SEW 4, J...vdl I. Intl a...e
.dqo...., .a a. ds.�..S o*.� «er4wd 0.. domoi« (D 7.ummd b Uo
_AvoycA Th ARCNITLCTLRL
_NND PLANNING
• R"✓Irrtc G LDJIGN
•ARCnf2TUltnL Y1UlTtATION
• GXARIIC DL/IGN
UT )LkN
NNING
DESIGN.
t...nd. 0.f.t N«d • H.lu. VI - ueo
inJw...I«.(, 4.4
M.a: n....lspot n..«.
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AM10DT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
S1111 WATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (6511235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PROPOSED
PLANS
CLRTIP1CATION
I hereby aptly the an pIen Ira papered by n• « untie• my anent apawaton end d a: I arta d.h
lin E Padu .oaide.
l L.r, m A..,nn de. m.
har
t of tb. Sr. poi Minnesota
Sip..me
Noe Nay Rama
den
Lama
DLlIGNLD DRAWN
MP, RT
DAT*
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
COr"rrt IGI -IT.
0 2005 PUT1.IAN PLANNING 8 DESIGN
=Tim 4m.p. the .II loin . i .d
wnpweo• d manes ..d d: eiennn a. and
e [pyeybnd mMd Dar RN,. ✓i Deane an
sua."F �yH In A; .ybu.n meend
Do v root a an. antral win.. an..m hoe
PP&D•DDI . chest dart
• LAND/CAR AINCEIITGCTVRG
• LAND ?LANNRNG
• RGJIDGN'NLDL/K7N
• ARCMITT CTIJRAL RUU/TRATON
• GRAaT11C DtJb?N
PUTMAN I
PLAIt N't NI N
& DESIGN
>y Rana& Eke.. Nash . Nd.. VI . toes
phone. (,•{}W Jw: I..: E.Nhamee
EMd nma.fm«a.m:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• III
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
NOTE 1
INV=9120
PIM=913 7
VINOJS PAT-
71
\ \\\\ \
\\\
UT1 TY
P. E
CNrpllnU
�� islx3
Iyi'n,�iUL�., a
\\\\\
\\ \\ \\
\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\e�'
42 OAK
MULn-PURPOSE
UTILITY BARRIER
\\
\� \v \ it i \
\\\� \ c\\\ - \\\\
\\\\ \\\\\\ v
XS7rti
�Uy
RIM=934 22
INV=930 53 0
NOTE 1
\
\\\\\\\\�V\\\ \\\ \\\ \\ \ \\
,\
BAR tR
\ \\\\\
\\\\\\ \\\\\\\
\\\\, \ �\\\\ \\\\\* \\\\\\
UTILITY
POLE
Ln-P DSE
BAR
PAIR A = RETAINING WALL
TD DC C. CTED umDCR
DIFFERENT CONTRACT
Arri
\L�� C NO
GRA wt. DR,,
ULn-PURP
U11UTY BARRI
• \ \
\\\•
\ \\
\\\\ \ \\\\\7\‘k\\ \\\\\\\O \\\\ \\
INV=928 7
UT1UTY
POL
NOTE 1
0 30 60
NOTFS.
1 INSTALL EROSION FENCE AND ANIT-TRACKING PAD
PRIOR TO ANY OTHER WORK
2 CONSTRUCT POND 9 OUTLET STRUCTURE AND
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER
3 CONSTRUCT WEST BERM OF POND 9 TOPSOIL, SEED
AND INSTALL EROSION MAT
4 EXCAVATE POND 9
5 SEE SHEET 3 FOR FINAL EROSION CONTROL
IN
•-6x - x==x
❑ ❑ ❑
7-
TZZ
r) ITUMINOU AT
OU
z
0
a
dD
0
0
6
PROJECT ENGINEER KJT
N
PROJECT N0
0
0
0
o
0
1-
U
OL.1
Z
O Q
aid
J
La
Z
F J W
W LA M
N 11 0
ce
Z
z
`iN
ENGINEERS
SHEET NO.
2 OF 13
N.
MERMESEMO
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC
CHRISAAMODT PRINCJPAI
64/8 MANNING AVE NORTH
S11LLWATER, MN 55082
PFIONE (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
PROPOSED
PLANS
I Fady m.eb do 4I..I..
des or, Ikea supra ad dm l m dd,
Laaaed Pnakaval emu. Ad. , .4. de
sue.
Ms Mac Passes
Dar
D..." .4,
Pl��a�lcr.�s) � ��.I►v�
MP RT
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DFAW\
IRANSMI1TED
4/13/06
0 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING 8 DESIGN
m04 4 y. d, *dwell tem modem d
D.=pe a4.& .,Dr
IJJ�®a. LE WDD pmm.d Fe W d
Lm C�.¢•I.. AI nee.e mv.ad
=De Ka PKID-D0I d�c 4/.0... dew D.,.edm �
Nto
A
�Ob NUMbf=Fzl
'J,NC/CAS !.l CrJTt01 U'[L
• .ND r-.NNL^1G
• :.RCr.ITLCTURnL LLUlTR: '"ION
•
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRISAAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STUi WATER, MN 55082
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
COMPREHEN-
SIVE PLAN &
ZONING
CLRTIF7CATION
i.c.. .al lm x Aa.aam e., .dn e
Iaa.aalta. b, . of Mi.a«,.
Sya.wt
Naar M. P.maa
Dot
.Kca.a ester
DLtIGNLD DFCAWN
MP, RT
DATt
DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAWN
TRANSMITTED
4/13/06
Co rr IGh1T
0 2005 PUTMAN, PLANNING & DESIGN
=TM. ! a.to.. ,k II Ira. • .y , d
t ofe. ud ,6a I..,. dt dam. we F
ao,am.d eA al V.r u Rl a I U (W&US
uwa[�a - (�Di1 t br 11.x d
S t t,amVni i•� A;,du.,a,ermd.
W .. allo..00f >. a. P ,mesa low
VPID•ODI or elm. a les
afx e
sires tort
DOS NUM6 fC
•LANOICAP .nRCnITGCTURL
• LAND In-AIWING
•RL/CCNI CIL/1CM
• ARC1-1'17.-CTURA1- LLU/"R[AT1ON
• G RAPT-OC OGJIGiV
PUTMAN
PLANN{NG
& DESIGN.
4 6.a genes • Hdw.. VI • ;tab
ah....:rn!w ern k. 1^J,a eau
PHASE IV'
2015
7. Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning
requirements;
The rezoning of the property to Cottage Residential is consistant with the City Com-
prehensive Plan and with the adjacent property. The portions of the existing Liberty
on the Lake development that lie to the east and south are zoned Cottage Residential
while the area to the north is zoned Townhouse.
PHASE III
2002
PHASE IV*
2015
15
✓ N.
Moo Desian by Ryon Smith
�t.0
OIi
NTERLACE
ti k /)DRY
0 UPPER
I�FNI �
Engineering Department
Zoning Map
4110
1110
4110
O
111,
11110
O
O
410
41110
CD
411.
OP
•
AGRICULTURE
BUSINESS PARK COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS PARK INDUSTRIAL
BUSINESS PARK OFFICE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
CRD
GENERAL HEAVY INDUSTRY
PUBLIC ADMINSTRATIVE OFFICES
ONE FAMILY
TWO FAMILY
HIGH DENSITY FAMILY
MEDIUM DENSITY FAMILY
COTTAGE RESIDENTIAL
TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL
LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL
VILLAGE COMMERCIAL
TOWN HOUSE
PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
COVE TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL
COVE COTTAGE RESIDENTIAL
COVE TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL
1 1 L Bluffs / Shoreland Area
&man.
Parcels Ontide City
N
s
800 0
City limit
F portion Areas
Rallrood
P:C, tit
Srr11,,d:er
Connnunit) Develop.
E and Planninc
Sources:
Washington County Suety Department
City of Stillwater - Planning Department
800 1600 Feet
answyxsw.yctalz
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ID
•'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
a
• 8 A descnphon of alternatives to the demolition,
•
• As descnbed earlier, in item number 5, Page 7, alternatives to demolition were consid-
ered The alternative that holds the most hope for saving the structure at this point is
• moving the structure off -site This also presents some difficulties The site is not very
• flat, making attempts to move large structures very difficult and costly The flattest
• way into and out of the site is crowded with the tree canopy of large hentage trees,
which would require removal of the resource we are trying to protect
Relocating the house on the site was also bnefly described earlier This would still
• require overcoming the moving difficulties mentioned above, as well as modifications
• to the structure to bnng it into compliance with the design guidelines of the area
• Assuming the structure were relocated onto a new foundation within the new Bevel-
• opment, the following upgrades would need to be made
• Electrical
• Mechanical
• Insulation
Windows •
Siding
• Roofing
Plumbing
• Drywall
• Floonng
Cabinetry
• Countertops
• Painting
•
• In addition, the following items would need to be removed pnor to moving the struc-
ture
• West addition
• East porch
• West garage
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9 Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restora-
tion or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible
The sale of the building has been advertised in the Stillwater Gazette and Stillwater
Couner
Two story house for sale to be removed from site Solid
construction Roomy 1900 square foot layout, 950 square feet
per floor Contact Chris at 651-235-7212
In terms of the economic feasibility of reuse, if we assume the structure were to be
relocated on site and brought up to similar condition of the adjacent structures (which
will all be new homes) then the savings found in reuse of the structure would be lim-
ited to the general framing and sheathing of the structure This has been estimated to
have a value of $23,173 for matenals and labor
The costs involved in moving the structure from the existing site to a new location on
site, and preparing the structure for it's makeover (removal of old insulation, wiring,
windows, siding, additions, etc ) has been estimated to be $45,000
Given these numbers, we have determined that the reuse of the structure on site is not
economically feasible We will continue to offer the building for sale for removal off
site If no buyer comes forward pnor to our development time frame, we will need to
demolish the structure
MigiMMEIWO
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC
Q-IRISMMODr PRWOPAI
6428 MANNING AVE NORTH
STILLWATFR, MN 55082
PHONE (651) 235-721'7
l—re0 _CT�
"LIBERTY
WEST"
DEMOLITION
PLAN REVIEW
ALTERNATIVES
11e.b, ode dh rVm w rasa aas
den dad .Deems d de 1® dell
Lamed Dmkrm.J Leap Ades, oda d:
1a.. 4 d. See, al Mamas
Noe Mae Paws
Dar
lip deal
DLY1CN=C O. A -JN
MP IT
l DESIGNED
CHECKED
DRAW%
TRAVSMIIIED
4/13/06
O 2005 PUTMAN PLANNING 8 DESIG4
-lV h.nm, b a.a l lee .m+e-- ..d
...Pare d om d d: d® de
p rae,gspda 6. .eDemOliar
uD4`
b.r UUva�oaou c omamd
waD.or—. - da. corm .am ra.m- cm
D•DrH - eta aa-
„Doc, NUr-1
5's_�mar
•
•
'J.VD rJ.\n'L'JG
•
•