Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-11-01 HPC PacketZoning 1111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111111 ttlwater a3r�. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, November 1, 2004 7 00 p m City Council Chambers City Hall 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA Approval of October 4, 2004 minutes 1 Case No DR/02-47 Final design approval for 501 Lofts Condominiums located at 501 North Main Street Jack Buxell —Buxell Architects, representing applicant 2 Case No DR/04-64 Design review of light pole banners for the histonc downtown Main Street Bob Lane — Lane Design Group, Inc representing the Historic District of the Chamber of Commerce 3 Case No DR/04-65 Design review of extenor building modifications for the building located at 223 South Main Street Peter Sampair, applicant Other items a Distnbution of photo assignments for Staples and Mays Addition b Investigator for Staples and Mays Addition Architectural Study CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission October 4, 2004 Present Howard Lieberman, chair Phil Eastwood, Diane Hark, Patte Kraske, Brent Peterson and Roger Tomten Others Planner Sue Fitzgerald Absent Jeff Johnson Mr Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Tomten moved approval of the minutes of Sept 8, 2004 Ms Hark seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/02-47 Design review of modifications proposed for 501 Lofts at 501 North Main St J Buxell Architecture representing the applicant Mr Buxell was present He said he was back before the HPC due to concerns expressed by the Planning Commission He bnefly reviewed some of the changes The fifth floor now includes two tenant -owned efficiency units and two penthouse units, along with storage The end units, which previously had open porches, now have enclosed sun porches EIFS is proposed to be used below the first floor for flood protection reasons, the base will be covered with landscaping The roof and parapet are consistent with the onginal design, he said The rear elevation also is basically the same Mr Buxell noted the 501 site was listed as having the potential for a six -story residential building in the city's Downtown Plan As onginally approved, he said, the structure was 59'6" to the mid -point of the roof (although due to an error, that is listed as 54' 11" in a letter of 2002) and 66'6" to the peak above grade The building now is 65'6" to the peak, he said He concluded that the building as currently proposed is no different than ongmally approved Several members expressed their concern with design changes Mr Lieberman said the building now appears "institutional" and is not in keeping with the character of downtown Stillwater He also expressed concern with the glass and mass as viewed from the east elevation The "factory echo" is gone from the design, he said Mr Tomten said he was most concerned with the mass of the structure He also expressed a concern about the streetscape, saying that has been an issue since the retail element was lost Mr Peterson noted that height keeps coming up as an issue He said he would like to see a building elevation as it appears from the north Mr Buxell responded the current plans are inside the ongmal footpnnt The structure is actually smaller and shallower than originally approved, and the roof ndge is 1' lower, he stated Mr Buxell also noted that the design has always shown lots of glass on the east elevation City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission October 4, 2004 Ms Kraske agreed that mass was a concern She suggested that opening up the end units as onginally shown would change the look of the building The discussion concluded with Mr Lieberman moving to not approve the design as presented and inviting the applicant to return to the HPC's next regular meeting with a revised plan that reflects the HPC's concerns Mr Eastwood seconded the motion Mr Lieberman amended his motion to table approval until the applicant addresses design concerns Mr Eastwood accepted the amended motion, motion passed unanimously Mr Buxell pointed out that timing is an issue for the applicant, as matenals need to be ordered soon to begin framing He asked if the HPC would be receptive to an informal meeting pnor to the next regular meeting to get reaction to design revisions Members stated they would be amenable to that meeting if a convenient meeting time can be arranged Case No DR/04-42 Design review of signage for In Studio at 212 N Main St Kevin and Jody Nyenhuis, applicants The applicants were not present Mr Peterson asked if the applicants planned to have a wall graphic Ms Fitzgerald said that request will be made at a later date Mr Eastwood moved approval as conditioned Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-47 Design review of a sign package for 452 N Main St Tem Bnne, applicant Tem and Monty Bnne were present, along with the owner of Cornerstone Gifts The plan, as proposed, includes four 2x8 signs to be placed in a sign band area, along with two signs indicating the building address at the corners of the southeast elevation Mr Eastwood asked whether the proposal meets the requirements for lineal front footage Mr Brine responded that all tenants have more than 16' of front footage Members suggested making the building address, 450, smaller and perhaps including North Main underneath the address Mr Peterson asked if the sign bands would be centered between the windows, the applicants responded in the affirmative Mr Tomten moved to approve the sign package with the condition that the tenant signs be centered above the two window bays, that the applicant modify the "450" sign to include the wording North Main or On Main, and that the signage not be lighted Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Mr Peterson, seconded by Mr Eastwood, moved_ to approve the Cornerstone Gift signage, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-58 Design review of rear signage for Papa Murphy's Pizza at 1754 Market Dr Kevin Knoop, applicant 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission October 4, 2004 The applicant was not present Ms Fitzgerald noted the request is consistent with the other tenants in the building Mr Peterson, seconded by Ms Hark, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-59 Design review of signage for Cynthia's Bridal at 1250 Frontage Road Cynthia Mettlmg, applicant The applicant was not present Ms Fitzgerald said the proposed sign meets the square footage requirements Ms Kraske, seconded by Mr Eastwood, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-60 Design review of signage for Aenal Companies at 1260 Frontage Road Dan Nault — Jones Sign Company, representing the applicant The applicant was not present The requested sign meets the square footage requirements Mr Eastwood, seconded by Ms Hark, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-61 Design review of signage for Ponies Sports Bar and Grill at 1820 Market Drive Diane Savino, applicant The applicant was not present Mr Eastwood, seconded by Mr Peterson, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-62 Design review of a restaurant, Cafe Cravings, at Liberty on the Lake Village Tanek Architecture, representing the applicant Nathaniel Shay was present representing the applicant He bnefly reviewed design plans, materials and colors for the restaurant/bar Outdoor seating is planned The trash receptacle will be enclosed The request is for two signs, neither of which will be lighted Ms Fitzgerald noted that technically the restaurant fronts on two streets, allowing for two signs as requested Mr Peterson moved approval as conditioned, changing the wording of conditions No 2 and 15 to reflect that lighting plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff Mr Lieberman seconded the motion Motion passed 5-0, with Mr Tomten abstaining Case No DR/04-63 Review of carnage rides in the downtown area Keith Beckhn, applicant Mr Beckhn was present and bnefly explained his request When asked where the drop-off, pick- up space would be, Mr Beckhn said he would like to have a space by the caves/Italian restaurant on South Main Street He would propose to have a sign by the parking space Mr Eastwood noted a concern about traffic Mr Beckhn responded that he had dnven carriages in Boston and New York City 3 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission October 4, 2004 Mr Lieberman asked if the city would require an indemnification agreement Mr Russell stated the city would require the applicant to have insurance and hold the city harmless Mr Tomten said he thought Mr Becklin's proposal would be a nice addition to the city and suggested that he work with the Planning Commission to find a parking location that works well for him Mr Tomten moved approval with the condition that the applicant come back to the HPC with a signage proposal for the parking space Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Other items Updated plans for the Teddy Bear Park were included in the agenda packet Members stated they have never seen plans for the park, only the demolition request Ms Fitzgerald will check into that issue Modifications in lighting and signage for the Veterans Memonal — Information was included in the agenda packet Update on investigator for Staples and Mays Addition — Ms Fitzgerald said she had contacted an investigator on SHPO's list who has agreed to do the survey It was suggested that perhaps Mr Empson has changed his mind and might be willing to do the survey It was agreed to approach Mr Empson one more time and made a decision on the investigator at the next HPC meeting A memo from the building official regarding an approved garage demotion was in the agenda packet Mr Eastwood questioned the demolition not coming before the HPC pnor to approval Mr Peterson referred to the letter from the Minnesota Histoncal Society regarding the proposed "de -listing" of the Terntonal Prison from the National Register of Histonc Places There was a discussion of the portable sign that had been placed on the Mortgage Company property on Chestnut Street Ms Fitzgerald said legal action will be taken if the sign is not removed immediately Meeting was adjourned at 9 40 p m Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 4 I I* HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/02-47a Heritage Preservation Date November 1, 2004 Project Location 501 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Jack Buxell, Joe Musolf — J Buxell Architecture representing applicant Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of budding modifications to the 501 Lofts building Background This project was tabled at the October 4, 2004 meeting The architect was going to revise some of the modifications Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of building modifications to the 501 Lofts building There are two main changes The first is the addition of two condominiums and guest quarters to the fifth floor On October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission granted a Variance to the height of the building 50 feet permitted, 54 feet 11 inches granted On October 11, 2004, the applicants are going to ask for a modification to the Variance Instead of 54 feet 11 inches, the applicants will ask for a building height of 60 feet 59 units were approved, 68 units and now proposed Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless the Planning Commission grants approval 3 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 4 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 5 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 6 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy solid masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project and a detail provided to the Planning Department r 7 Fencing, as indicated on the plans, shall protect all trees required to remain on site, or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during construction activity 8 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 9 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 10 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 11 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 12 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 13 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 14 All security lights on building shall be downlit and a plan submitted to the Planning Department 15 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community Development Director Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Drawings/Approved 10/14/02 Elevations/Minutes - 10/14/02 From SAL I TEPrIAN PIES AP " UOU I ST 952 920 8474 09/' 2004 14 51 #904 P 002 Case No Date Filed: - Receipt No.. - Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (I e. photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following Information Is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Sol N NL►,w Si - Assessor's Parcel No. 30z4314o6 Zoning District CAST:, Descnptlon of Project In detail See, IP kAc, %ed! ip1441, "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith ,n all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if 1t 1s granted and used" If representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature is squired LroC 5 04- 9tXJA',Inc. Property Owner Mmelc Representative l it"kell rck.AL.)bre, L}� Mailing Address 't 'D 14ytir,►.,37 Icr Mailing Address co N S�. City State Zip S+ L ulsTark , MN 5S41\, City State Zip MMree.?,ctrs MN SSyaj Telephone No 9512 9ten Oz. -2- Telephone No Signatur,Signatur C \DOCUMENTS AHD SETTINGS\DWARD\DE5kTORDES1GN REVIEW PERMIT WPD February 5 2003 7G1 a 7AJ J 7cf- 7 q QC 77 bAG7—b7—AQC HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-64 Heritage Preservation Date November 1, 2004 Project Location Historic Downtown Area Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Joci Tilsen and Bob Lane Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of banners for the Historic Downtown District Discussion At the May 4, 2004 City Council meeting, Council approved the expenditure of $4000 for banners in the downtown pending a written endorsement from the executive director of the Chamber of Commerce, and final design approval by the Council following design approval by the HPC At the June 7, 2004 HPC meeting, the Commission voted to disapprove of the proposal at this time and to work with the Historic District Committee in looking at other alternatives Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photo Case Now Date Filed Receipt No.• Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required All supporting material (t e photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project PbuoNibv.%J Assessor's Parcel No Zoning Distnctcy,r Description of Project in detail gHt ,S -Tot— HI hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit If it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner r_i iM RepresentativeSgt MailingAddwrvs u,cA^.444t tiFe- C� Mailing Address 135 1#• I� 5 CityState Zipr c_W_ �`p�Z 5511 City State Zip Arcn-j Telephone No l 4SO 33e27, Telephone No LogS.3$39 H \mcnamara\sheila\2002\design review permit wpd Apnl 12, 2002 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission June 7, 2004 Members were appreciative of the changes that have been made Mr Johnson moved approval as conditioned, changing condition of approval No 2 regarding lighting to review by the Hentage Preservation Commission, with a 17t condition that the mechanical unit ventilation louvers be looked at for sound mitigation and submitted to the HPC at a later date Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-34 Design review of extenor signage for The Salad Shoppe at 221 E Chestnut St Dave and Kathie Tnemert, applicants The applicants were not present Mr Lieberman spoke against the proposed spelling of "Shoppe " Mr Johnson questioned whether the phone number was necessary on the sign, and said it would be nice to see color samples Mr Lieberman moved to approve with the conditions that the applicant be asked to consider changing the spelling of Shoppe, that the signage to less cluttered than submitted, and that color samples be provided to staff for review Mr Johnson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-35 Design review of an accessory dwelling umt at 403 Hancock St Michael Vincent, applicant Mr Vincent was present He said the new structure will match the existing house He is asking the Planning Commission for a vanance for the square footage He said he has spoken to neighbors, and none have expressed any objections to his plans Mr Lieberman pointed out that the HPC can only review design, the square footage is for the Planning Commission to consider Mr Johnson moved to approve the design with the condition that the roof pitch match the existing house and that the siding of the new structure match the existing house or that the existing house be resided to match the new structure Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Other items Bob Lane, Joci Tilsen and Meg Brownson representing the Histonc Distnct of the Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce appeared with a request to reintroduce the banner program in the downtown district Ms Brownson said the Chamber would buy the banners The banners would be sponsored by participating businesses to help fund the program They showed samples of proposed banners, which included the themes "explore, play, welcome and dining," the banners also included the name of the sponsonng business 5 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2004 Mr Eastwood said he felt the proposed banners don't fit the character of downtown Several members suggested the banners would distract from business signage Ms Tilsen said the intent is to beautify the downtown area Mr Lieberman noted the HPC is not opposed to beautification Mr Eastwood moved to disapprove of the proposal at this time and to work with the Histonc Distnct Committee in looking at other alternatives Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Ms Fitzgerald informed members that the new newspaper corral is working well She also noted, as Mr Balay mentioned earlier, that the Chestnut Building banner will be removed Mr Lieberman, seconded by Ms Hark, moved to adjourn at 9 15 p m Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 6 GREATER STILLWATER PO Box 516, 106 S Main Street Stillwater MN 55082 ZChambepr of Commerce;' Phone (651) 439 4001/651) 439 7700 Fax (651) 439 4035 www ilovestillwatercom S t Y B yp t L k Elmo' 0 k Park H ght St llw t a � October 22, 2004 Dear Histonc Preservation Committee Members, On behalf of the Histonc District of the Chamber of Commerce we respectfully request your approval of the attached designs for light pole banners In the early 1990's the Chamber of Commerce m cooperation with the City of Stillwater placed banners on 40 light poles throughout the histonc district There were blue ones in parlung lot light poles and 4 other colors randomly distnbuted throughout town In 1996 or so, the banners were removed for repamtmg the light poles and never replaced Many of them were wind worn In early 2004, the Chamber of Commerce Histonc Distnct Committee inquired about new banners and made a presentation to the City Council The City Council approved banners pending design approval by the Histonc Preservation Committee and then authonzed Steve Russell to hire Bob Lane, a designer to assist with the preparation of a proposal to the Histonc Preservation Committee A presentation was made and the design was not supported by the Histonc Preservation Committee Bob Lane and I met with the Histonc Preservation Committee in September, 2004 to discuss direction and focus of banner designs Some committee members were interested in red, white and blue bunting designs and others mentioned shades of green and blue Other comments included revisiting the shape of the banners There was an interest in reflectmg the uniqueness of Stillwater as well as the preserving the histoncal designation of the town In response to your comments Bob Lane presented additional designs to the Histonc Distnct Committee We feel strongly that while Stillwater is a bustling town during the June, July and August months and has busy weekends throughout September and early October, the remaining 9 months of the year the town has a dreary streetscape and we wish to present the downtown as more lively and vital to the community 12 months of the year Our goal is to bnng a strong sense of place that is not defined by a major highway, but rather by the familiarity of the activities on the sidewalks and in the shops and nverfront We are interested in the continued revitalization of the histonc distnct by preserving histonc commercial architecture and developmg a powerful economic development base as well We have attached 2 designs for the banners The overall design of the banners was dramatically changed with your input They are a different shape, color and we are excited about them These designs reflect your feedback and with your approval of both of them we will move forward with this project Our intention is to be able to have the red, white and blue banners up for the summer months and then the other banners for the remauung months of the year We have also attached a design for sponsorship recognition, this will allow us to fund the maintenance of banner project We need and have the ability to generate a positive commercial distnct downtown, but we need you to put into practice policies that are visionary and believe m the vitality of the central historic distnct of Stillwater We believe that these banners will visual reinforce the pnde, diverse community values and community history of Stillwater's Histonc Distnct We respectfully ask for your approval at this tune Thank you, Joci Tilsen Co -Chair Histonc Distnct Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce This banner uaas donated by The Valle) Bookseller a 4 • This banner was donated by The alley Bookseller Donor Plaque, ea side of light pok, attached w d. tble faad V.H.B. tape, 3" x 3" Winter Comparison HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-65 Heritage Preservation Date November 1, 2004 Project Location 223 South Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Peter Sampair, representing Sammies Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of building modifications Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval for building modifications to the 223 South Main Street building housing Sammies The applicant has had old rotted wood siding removed for the east side of the building on the first floor Originally, he was going to replace it with bnck The top two stories are bnck Mr Sampair has not been able to find brick samples that match the existing brick He is proposing to replace the rotting wood siding with limestone siding similar to the Brines building located on the north side of this building (see attached photo) Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photos If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone No Case No: Dr./Di--Ls Date Filled• 1c3-Zz. cc(c Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following Information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 2/3 c IVIniti Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Description of Project in detail , or / iu) 61 i(..i Thor Wo i) ter. r/./ r7-(& <2E L OF Y- • J / / 4 i !t(NIES o�v plL itIck ThA ric I - c4�l Mc E&'V iJi1LL I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence lei submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be M true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and l used" WOr Representative SA/AA-C— C-3 L4K li VE: - Mailing Address 1 j7 - 1,4City State Zip C ] L[ Zts 6[276' Telephone No 1 H \mcnamara\sheila\2002\design review permit wpd April 12, 2002 C1�sod.o'.a 7tvi�^tzra2 ramt* serss ffii t414114 140.4.4K%$',weS S z4 .(PJT"b .31af;. #.1AM" R"1( t) 1(1 7Rt) ' \l\ z111\ \\1111s I1 I I i t\ I \\ '(U \ I 1 1 1 1 11 \t)II )1111ti\O 11 N )\(1) 1210AV 1\t)1, 4 )1z111 l \T N I\ .7)1AI H O( FILIr`V:1 f Sue Fitzgerald From tschofen@comcast net Sent Monday October 04 2004 3 19 PM To Sue Fitzgerald Subject Staples and Mays Addition ® q� 1 - 'roposal for Staples and doc Dear Sue, Please find attached a proposal for the Staples and May's Addition survey In considering the proposal, I think it may be important to make sure your HPC understands I'm not Don, and for the flat fee I've proposed here (based on what I understand your funding to be), I can't even try to be him -) But I'll do my best to produce some reasonable survey results for the project If you have any questions or recommended changes , feel free to call or drop me a note I will be in Duluth doing field research for a Part 1 application on Thursday and Friday, but will be in early this week and should be back in the office next Monday Regards, Carmen Tschofen , 2667 Parkview Boulevard Robbinsdale MN, 55422 763-522-5709 1 Proposal for Staples and May's Addition Architectural Study October 4, 2004 Proposal contact information Carmen Tschofen 2667 Parkview Boulevard Robbinsdale MN 55422 763-522-5709 tschofen@email com Principal investigator qualifications Carmen Tschofen has almost two decades of expenence in history research and interpretation and meets and exceeds the Secretary of the Intenor's Professional Qualifications Standards for histonans She has authored several National Register nominations, including those for city halls in Ironton and Virginia, Minnesota, and recently conducted an architectural survey in downtown Owatonna under contract with the State Histonc Preservation Office She has worked previously in Stillwater with the St Croix Valley History Education Committee and Arcola Mills to produce local history education matenals for area elementary schools, and worked extensively with the City of Fanbault Hentage Preservation Commission to produce preservation education matenals and web sites She holds a B A in German from the University of Minnesota and an M A in Folklore from Indiana University She also has international research and teaching expenence as a Rotary International Scholar and a Fulbnght teaching assistant Project scope The consultant will survey the approximately 125 properties in the Staples and May's Addition to Stillwater to evaluate the historic significance of each property and to evaluate the overall Preservation Planning Area Cntena for evaluation will include those established for local designation of Stillwater's histonc properties, the Secretary of the Intenor's Standards for Registration, and the Minnesota State Histonc Preservation Office's guidelines for such projects The consultant will then identify and make recommendations for o the boundanes of a potential histonc distnct o individual properties significant under local, state and/or national contexts and cntena o properties potentially eligible for nomination to the National Register of Histonc Places Staples and May's Addition 1 Tschofen , 10/04 The consultant will create survey sheets for each property using the City's preferred survey form The consultant will provide standard survey data as available but will not provide comprehensive and detailed histories on the occupancy of each property The consultant will seek sufficient survey data to articulate patterns, to identify themes and potentially significant properties, and to support conclusions and recommendations The consultant will present the conclusions m a final narrative report Project schedule The consultant will begin work by or on November 1, 2005, with the project completed by August 31, 2005 The consultant will attend three meetings with the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission (two prior to May, 2005 and one in August 2005) and provide progress reports to the Planning Department and the Minnesota Histoncal Society as requested A final draft of the narrative report will be completed by August 15, 2005 A tentative schedule outline is as follows November -December 2004 Review Stillwater's Histonc Contexts documents, survey work by the Stillwater HPC, and other secondary source research Windshield survey of area with digital photography for database reference January 2005 Begin identification of properties and pnmary source research on the 125 properties in the Preservation Planning Area Build database files April 2005 Begin b/w documentation photography Complete pnmary source research and database entnes Identify potential themes and contexts for area and connect and contrast to existing local themes/contexts May 2005 Provide draft of themes and contexts and list potentially eligible properties to City Complete documentation photography and turn in film to City Finalize text on survey data sheets Obtain processed contact sheets from City June 2005 Begin statistical evaluation and final draft Finalize identification of potential National Register properties and define distnct boundaries Request development of graphics (maps, etc) from City as needed August 15 2005 Provide final draft to Stillwater for review August 31 2005 Close out project The consultant will discuss potential schedule changes or adjustments with the City of Stillwater and the Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission in a timely manner Staples and May's Addition 2 Tschofen , 10/04 Project products The following work products will be provided to the City of Stillwater upon completion of the project o One bound hard copy and one electronic copy (CD) of a final report, which will address o The development and contextual/thematic features of the area o Companson to other surveyed neighborhoods o Specific properties eligible for local histonc designation and/or National Register of Histonc Places o Planning methods for preservation of structures, landscapes and neighborhoods o Recommendations for future survey work o Project area maps developed in cooperation with the City of Stillwater o One set of survey sheets with black and white thumbnail photographs for each property surveyed and one electronic copy (CD) of database files Project costs A flat fee of $9000 will be billed for this project The fee will be billed in three installments based on work completed o Completion of existing document review and windshield survey, to be billed in January, 2005 $3000 o Submission of draft of themes and list of potentially eligible properties, to be billed in May, 2005 $3000 o Project close-out, with all work products completed and turned over to the City of Stillwater, to be billed in September, 2005 $3000 The flat fee includes all consultant travel to and in Stillwater, photocopying costs in repositones not affiliated with the City of Stillwater, and archival -quality black and white film It is understood that the City of Stillwater will provide in -kind goods and services to the project/consultant, including o Maps and lists of street addresses for the properties in the Staples and May's Addition at the start of the project o The addressing and mailing of a letter, text to be provided by the consultant and reproduced on City letterhead, informing residents of the survey and requesting survey -related information o Photocopies from documents held by City, including building permits and land and tax records, and matenals in the Stillwater Public Library o Materials copied at the Washington County Histoncal Society will be billed directly to the City o The City will provide film processing and provide the consultant with contact sheets processed to SHPO standards o The City will assist with the development of supplemental graphics such as maps, and produce multiple copies of the final report as needed Staples and May's Addition 3 Tschofen , 10/04 1 I 1Water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, October 4, 2004 7 00 p m City Council Chambers City Hall 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA A )proval of September 8 2004 minutes 1 Case No DR/02/47 Design review of modifications proposed for 501 Lofts located at 501 North Main Street Joe Musolf — J Buxell Architecture representing the applicant 2 Case No DR/04 42 Design review of signage for In Studio located at 212 North Main Street Kevin and Jody Nyenhuis applicants 3 Case No DR/04 47 Design review of a sign package for 452 North Main Street Tern Brine applicant 4 Case No DR/04-58 Design review of rear signage for Papa Murphy s Pizza located at 1754 Market Drive Kevin Knoop applicant 5 Case No DR/04 59 Design review of signage for Cynthia s Bridal located at 1250 Frontage Road Cynthia Mettling applicant u Case No DR/04-60 Design review of signage for Aerial Company located at 1260 Frontage Road Dan Nault — Jones Sign Company representing applicant 7 Case No DR/04-61 Design review of signage for Ponies Sports Bar and Grill located at 1820 Market Drive Diane Savino applicant 8 Case No DR/04-62 Design review of a new construction restaurant Cafo Cravings located in Liberty on the Lake Village Greg Rick — Tanek Architecture, representing applicant 9 Case No DR/04-63 Review of carriage rides in downtown area Keith Becklin applicant Other items a Modifications in lighting and signage for the Veterans Memonal located at Pine Street and North Third Street b Update on investigator for Staples and Mays Addition c Staples and Mays photo designations for members CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 1 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission September 8, 2004 Present Howard Lieberman, chairperson, Phil Eastwood, Diane Hark, Jeff Johnson and Roger Tomten Others Planner Sue Fitzgerald Absent Patte Kraske and Brent Peterson Mr Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Johnson moved approval of the minutes of Aug 2, 2004, noting a typo in the minutes of DR/04-48 Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR 04-48 Design review of North Coast Restaurant in the Grand Garage Jim Kellison was present and reviewed the proposed design and matenals He noted the exterior design has changed substantially from the previous restaurant proposal Outdoor seating is still proposed, he said He also stated the applicant will come back with a complete sign package Mr Johnson said it appeared there is some loss of parking Mr Kellison said the number of parking spaces has not changed from the approved plan, the intent is to provide valet parking Mr Lieberman asked if the proposed fire features had been reviewed by the Fire Department, Ms Fitzgerald responded in the affirmative The flame will be turned off when the restaurant is closed, Mr Kellison pointed out Mr Johnson moved to approve the revisions to the onginally-approved plans, with the condition that a sign plan for the entire building be provided, that clips of proposed lighting fixtures be provided, and that the Fire Chief review the fire features Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-41 Stillwater Mills on Main project Melissa Pfannenstem of DJR Architecture Inc provided the HPC with a project update and reviewed some 45 design changes enumerated in a wntten document Ms Pfannenstein bnefly spoke to each of the changes There was some discussion about the use of rockcast matenals versus bnck on certain facades Members asked that samples of the rockcast matenal be provided for the next discussion Mr Johnson asked about lighting fixtures Ms Pfannenstein said clips are not available at this time Mr Johnson asked if the existing wall along North Second Street will be replaced, Ms Pfannenstein responded in the affirmative Mr Johnson asked about roof units/mechanicals Ms Pfannenstein reiterated there will be no rooftop mechanicals There will be three elevator shafts City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission September 8, 2004 finished with Hardiboard The number of residential units — 98 — has not changed Mr Tomten asked if members could submit written comments, Ms Pfannenstein said those would be welcome There also was a bnef discussion about the use of awnings at the retail spaces and how that use would work with the residential units It was suggested that it might be better to utilize a sign band Mr Johnson moved to give concept approval to the revisions, with matenal samples to be provided for the next discussion Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Suki Thomsen, North Broadway, asked about the height of the structure Ms Pfannenstein said the structure is just under 50 feet to the top of the roof, with a parapet above The Main Street elevation will have a walkway, retail spaces, and three levels of housing From the rear elevation, only three stories of housing will be visible, she stated Dave May, representing the project developer, was present with a request to place banners on the sales trailer The request was for a 3x3 banner on the west side and 6x6 on the north site of the trailer Mr May said in future, when demolition occurs and construction begins, the project developer may be requesting an additional sign to let people know that other businesses on North Main Street are still open for business Mr Johnson suggested that staff be empowered to work with the developer on such signage if the need anses Ms Fitzgerald noted that if businesses are being negatively impacted, the city will take some type of emergency action The request for banners on the sales trailer was related to Case No DR/04-56, design review of a sales trailer in the parking lot at 227 N Main St Vern Stefan also was present for the discussion The discussion centered on the U-Haul rental vehicles currently parked at the site Mr Johnson noted if the sales trailer is located in the parking lot, there will be a loss of spaces and more demand for parking Mr Johnson asked if Mr Stefan could relocate the U-Haul vehicles, perhaps keeping some off site Mr Stefan said he could move the U-Hauls to the east side of the business, and he said locating the sales trailer at his business would not compromise the capacity of the lot to serve parking needs for the hardware store Mr May noted the intent is to have the sales trailer use terminated by next spnng Mr Lieberman moved to authonze placement of the sales trailer in the Maple Island Hardware parking lot from Oct 1, 2004-June 1, 2005, approving the requested banners, with the condition that there be no lighting, and that the applicant come back with any request to extend the length of the use Mr Johnson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-49 Design review of covered deck and review of an extenor bar on the north side of the building at Water Street Inn, 101 S Water St Chuck Dougherty, applicant 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 8, 2004 Chuck and Judy Dougherty were present Mr Dougherty bnefly reviewed the proposed design of the deck area Mr Johnson pointed out that the intent in the onginal plan approved by the City and SHPO was to maintain the histonc warehousehndustnal look of the deck, which was the original loading dock area Mr Dougherty explained that the current roof forces folks to look out on the railroad tracks and parking area rather than the nver Mr Johnson and Mr Tomten suggested there are alternatives such as skylights and lighted panels to achieve the desired effect, rather than changing the roofline Mr Johnson suggested that Mr Dougherty look at older warehouse distncts in the metro area for ideas on how to achieve his goal Mr Dougherty agreed to do that Mr Tomten asked if SHPO approval would be needed for any revisions Mr Johnson noted that since federal tax credits are involved, SHPO approval would be needed In the discussion regarding the bar, Mr Lieberman noted the north end of the building was never completed according to the plans approved by the City He asked about the status of plans to complete the north end Mr Dougherty said that is still in future plans Mr Johnson noted there was a timeline for enclosing the extenor fire escape Mr Lieberman asked staff to go through the onginally approved plans for the building and provide copies to both Mr Dougherty and the HPC There also was discussion of the requirement to enclose the trash receptacle Mr Dougherty said he would do that when the City clanfies its plan for the walkway to the nver, which currently shows a portion of his property being taken Mr Johnson and Mr Lieberman noted that enclosing the trash receptacle was a condition of approval eight years ago Mr Eastwood noted the proposed bar at the north end of the building is already in place Mr Lieberman suggested tabling the requests, with the understanding that the applicant not be required to tear down the structure that is already in place Mr Eastwood made that in the form of a motion Mr Tomten seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-50 Design review of a freestanding sign for River Valley Dental Care and Stenberg Orthodontics at 1395 Curve Crest Blvd Kirk X Van Blaircom, Pyramid Sign, representing the applicant Mr Blaircom and Dr Duerst were present Mr Blaircom explained the request for the mternally illuminated sign, which is 6'5" high and 10" wide Only the letters will be illuminated Mr Tomten moved approval as conditioned, Mr Eastwood seconded the motion Mr Johnson noted that according to the ordinance, signage in the Business Park is limited to 6' in height Mr Blaircom stated the applicant wanted to include the address on the sign If the sign is any lower, the bottom will be hidden by brush He also noted the adjacent business sign is 6' high but is placed on a 1' berm The sign will be 15' back from the property line, in according with the ordinance Mr Johnson noted that there is no regulation regarding the address, so technically the City of Stillwater 1 Heritage Preservation Commission September 8, 2004 sign could be seen as being in compliance with the ordinance Motion to approve as conditioned passed unanimously Case No DR/04-51 Design review of the extenor facade of a proposed office building at 901 S Third St Mark Weyer, applicant Most of the discussion centered on a suggestion by Mr Johnson that the applicant take advantage of the existing headers to return the window opemngs to the onginal, rather than four evenly - spaced windows as proposed Mr Johnson noted that the existing headers and in -fill bnck provide definite outlines of the ongmal windows He provided a sketch as to what replicating the original placement might look like Mr Tomten agreed that the window patterns do set the tone of the building's commercial history and make the building more interesting Mr Weyer said he would be hesitant to agree to try to replicate the onginal placement until he knows the cost associated with doing that Mr Eastwood said he had no problem with the window placement as shown by the applicant Mr Eastwood, seconded by Ms Hark, moved approval as submitted Mr Johnson volunteered to work with the applicant in an effort to replicate the onginal look as much as possible Mr Eastwood amended his motion to reflect that an HPC member will work with the applicant in developing plans, but that the applicant is under no obligation to accept those suggestions The amended motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-52 Design review of warehouse buildings located at 1773 Industrial Blvd Joe Peltier, applicant Mr Peltier was present He noted his plans are similar to the previously -approval plans for a Mini -Storage at the site His plans include two buildings, 82"by 24'and 14"high The buildings will be of the same colors as the adjacent building — tan and green with a green roof The buildings will be placed within an existing tan and green fence, and the lot will be blacktopped In the discussion, it was suggested that relocated the building shown on the plans on the south side of the property to the north side and back toward the rear property line would provide better screening Mr Eastwood asked about the condition of approval that the lot be blacktopped by the time of occupancy, Mr Peltier said he did not know if blacktoppmg could be done in the winter Mr Eastwood moved approval as conditioned, with the blacktoppmg to be completed by June 1 of next year, and the additional condition that the south building be relocated to the north side and rear of the property Mr Tomten seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-53 Design review of a 36-unit condominium in the Terra Spnngs development J Buxell Architecture, representing the applicant J City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission September 8, 2004 Brian Sweeney and Jack Buxell were present Mr Buxell said proposed retail space has been replaced with brownstone units that have the potential for future retail The tower element has been retained When asked about height, he noted there is a 20' difference in grade at this site The building will be 52' high from the median grade point to the median roof point, from the lowest grade to the roof peak will be 71 ` Rooftop mechanicals will not be visible, Mr Buxell said Lighting is part of the ongmal development package Fixtures will be downlit except for some tree lighting that will be reduced if it proves to be offensive to neighbors There also will be some lighting up the wall utilizing cut-off light sources Mr Johnson moved approval as conditioned, eliminating condition No 18 due to site elevations Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No 04/54 Design review of an addition for St Croix Orthopaedics Mohagen/Hansen, representing the applicant Mark Hansen briefly reviewed the expansion project A new entry will be created The new space will match the character of the existing windows The project will involve relocating one light pole in the parking lot Mr Tomten moved approval as condition, clarifying that the parking lot lighting utilizes shoebox fixtures that are downhghted Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-55 Design review of an extenor sign at 2000 Industnal Blvd Jennifer Cates, representing the applicant The applicant was not present The request is to replace the face on an existing freestanding sign The location of signage will not be changed, nor will the frame Mr Johnson moved approval as conditioned, with the additional condition that the sign not be lighted Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-57 Design review of signage for palm and tarot readings at 402 S Main St JoAnn and Tony Peterson, applicants The applicants were not present The request is for a 2 Y2' x 4' wooden sign, the sign will not be lit Mr Johnson moved approval as conditioned, with an additional condition that the applicants work with staff regarding placement of the sign Motion passed unammously r City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission September 8, 2004 Other items Update on 501 Lofts — Jack Buxell provided an update on the 501 project Most of the discussion focused on the trail system and flood control system on the nverfront side of the 501 project Mr Buxell said 501 developers have been asked to create a terminus for the trail system that wraps around Terra Springs He said they have been talking to manna/slip owners, Mr Desch, the City and Department of Natural Resources The desire, he said, is to removed existing "junk" plant materials and do new plantings to screen the working end of the manna He said current plans have the verbal support of the DNR The trail system will have comdors at each ends of the 501 building There will be a one -lane road on the nverfront side of the project, with a more fonnahzed parking area The proposal is to oversize the piping for the water treatment ponding to accommodate potential future needs All are concept proposals at this time, he said Regarding the 501 building, Mr Buxell said the previously proposed party room on the fifth floor has been eliminated Rather than the party room, the proposal is to have two resident - owned efficiency units The developer also is proposing two additional units on the fifth floor The additional units would be tucked back inside the parapet The height of the building was 68' 6" to the peak in the onginal plan, 69' 6" to the peak in this proposal There was no formal action taken Mr Lieberman summed up the discussion by noting for the record that the HPC has reviewed the 501 revisions and is supportive of the proposals as consistent with the onginal design Update on Staples and Mays Additional architectural study — Ms Fitzgerald informed members that the City received no RFPs for conducting the study SHPO said Ms Fitzgerald could call people on their list of potential investigators The grant fee will remain the same Letter from Jeff Johnson regarding rail abandonment — Mr Johnson's letter to SHPO was included in the agenda packet Lift bndge update — Mr Johnson noted that MnDOT has granted $5 million to upgrade the lift bndge Cost estimates to upgrade the bndge range from $5 million to $68 million A new bndge could be completed sometime between 2010 and 2011 Meeting adjourned at 10 45 p m Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/02-47 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location 501 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Jack Buxell, Joe Musolf — J Buxell Architecture representing applicant Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of building modifications to the 501 Lofts building Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of building modifications to the 501 Lofts building There are two main changes The first is the addition of two condominiums and guest quarters to the fifth floor On October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission granted a Variance to the height of the building 50 feet permitted, 54 feet 11 inches granted On October 11, 2004, the applicants are going to ask for a modification to the Variance Instead of 54 feet 11 inches, the applicants will ask for a building height of 60 feet 59 units were approved, 68 units and now proposed The second revision is to the materials on the facade of the building In October 2002, the materials indicated were primarily brick and glass The proposal is for brick, precast concrete, EIFS, modular brick and shakes Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the requests, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 All conditions of approval given on October 11, 2002 still pertain to the project Findings The proposal does not meet the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Drawings/Approved 10/14/02 Elevations/Minutes - 10/14/02 From.,SAL1TEPMAPI PIE AND ALMOUIST 952 920 8474 09/24/2004 14 51 #904 P 002 Case No Date Filed: Receipt No.. Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e. photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required All following Information Is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Sn1 N N1A,s• St Assessor's Parcel No. 7-8030Z014063S Zoning District GAP Descnptlon of Project In detail Sec w�-1-acAlei "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit If It Is granted and used" If representative Is not proPerty owner, then property owner's signature is Larivireci Vow or' t.W..th;.r, (ho Property Owner MArk ,►I,it•,�...w. Representative__ 11 A rcl,..1%.4ure, L+ Mailing Address "t3o1 }-1117 , 5urie. 10 Mailing Address 9 0c. N "Sri Si', City State Zip s+ 1ou\sTork . MN SSylb City State Zip M Arif- .Volis, MO 5-5-461 Telephone No 15. cr o ez. 2 Telephone No lie,. Signatur L Signatur C \DOCUMENTS AND SETPINGS\DWARD\DESKTOP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD February 5 2009 7A .r J J 7Cw Ta Z+n i -iz 1 r u-AH 17Wrig r QC 7T bop, _bp -A =' September 24, 2004 Sue Fitzgerald City Planner City of Stillwater City Hall 216 N 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re The Lofts of Stillwater at 501 N Main Street Planning Commission Variance Requests Dear Sue, On behalf of Mark Saliterman and Lofts of Stillwater, Inc J Buxell Architecture is submitting the attached application and supporting materials for consideration of two variances by the Stillwater Planning Commission We request to be placed on the Planning Commission Agenda for October 11, 2004 We are requesting two variances First we request a variance from the 4 stories allowed in CBD to 5 stories Second, we request a variance from 50 feet building height allowed to 60 ft 8 in Variance Request One Five stories requested Four stories allowed We are requesting to be allowed to use the volume under the roof trusses as residential homes on a fifth floor rather than empty rafter space This does not affect the height of the roof ridge We have pulled the soffits slightly back and up to accommodate fifthe floor windows We believe that the parapet height is such that there will be little noticeable difference from the surrounding neighborhood due to this change Variance Request Two 60'-8" building height requested 50' allowed 54"-11" variance previously granted Due to the alterations in the soffit line to accommodate the fifth floor occupancy, the mid -point of the roof (between plate and ridge) has moved to 60'-8" The overall building height of 66'-6" has not changed from that what was previously approved Again, we believe that the parapet height is such that there will be little noticeable difference from the surrounding neighborhood due to this change The Lofts of Stillwater at 501 N Main is proposed as 68 homes in five floors over an underground parking garage The gross building floor area (including the garage) will be 186,173 square feet Construction on piles, footings and foundations is underway Plans for building permit should be under review by the State of Minnesota and the City Building Department by the time of this Planning Commission meeting Included are elevations, sections and two perspectives We can bring larger exhibits to the meeting Respe J y- Musolf J Buxell Architecture, Ltd CC Mark Saliterman l;lll II IIIp IIII IIII ;IIIII I111 I�1:1:1:1:1 IIIIIIFilll111111 I111. EE II II� I ii!i!iii!i i!i!i!i!,,, / 'I 1 p ��1:1:1:1:1 ,!. > 1 f I f! •I,','li,^;'I'p�',' ,,,, ,•,ti'I'1ti'I'1"I'I j 'I"+I'I:•,,,' 1111'rrl,�,'s,, ' I�LhIJ!I�.I�LI�IS.I iPll IIPIII•IIII?ilPllllll�lll�lllallllrll l�l rrrrl IIIIIIII_II I� 11 II II II II II ,I,II II 11 II I ��' 1 1 1 1 1 1.1�1�1 II ! I I.I..II II IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII Il IIIII IIIII IIIII li'I1111111111111 1 1 1 1.1.1.1 I 1 1 1'1.1.1.1 ;; � I,,,,,„IIII I „,,,, ,III III I,I,I IIII IIII IIIIIIIIII II`k IIll iiili�iil,I IIIII IIIII iIiI il�''1 1 1.1.1'1.1 _ IIII iliiilili ilili ililFlllllllk IIIJd,lllli ilil;iili ilili it iiiiiljllljl i I: ' ; !!i!i!!!i!i!Li!i!!i!i i:! 6ii;i i'! f ; 111111111 IIIII IIIIII 1 II 11 j �j�I U. •IN ®■ 1 ' IN i it IIIIMIXMIIIDIMI _I._____®111®■ :I:I: _ T W., II s !11 I'II 11 I� . I. I� �I I�Ij t FI I� t II l ! ®■,, II Ill;lll IIIIIII!Illilllilil!II_ III!lilil,lilil;lill ii�lj-,II ��I El yl Il9jiill�lilil;l�lllli4l 11111 II:IIII,h1,1IIii (IIIII IF III1911 ¢I,I,I;IIiI� IIIII' !II IIII I; III II I;I,I,I.I,I,III III;III,1. IIIIIIIIIIIIII II I !IIIII IIII I�®- ®j■ lil�i iIlli ®� ®'�j lfi!i1i iIi IIi ii I,i i!fililfi!i4iili jljlilf=ililililljfii iliilPPi!ili$Ql ii!i!IIIIl 1 1 11 11'1 II IIIII IIIII II!11 i i IIII!III IIIIII I IIIII; vlllllii yl!I IIII IIIIII I!I I;I I III II lllllllllllll I Ill;l 1!Illlli IIIII I,I Ip� !III;III,I;IIIII,III I;Illl j` Ili i kl II III I IIII IIIII A:L IIOIIilailaalhl.l_ ul.l,lll.lil,e6l l;IJiL`a IIII,1-: IIII• !1!1!1!1!1!1!i I I l IIII ill !1i61IIIIII IIIlI ;I II®•le�lilil lli�l l �®C ` L®��J ■ frli��_ I elf Iy I'.illi�� I rya I�LaI�I�:�IJlalll�: WI;I,I,I;I I,I: Ls1�6,I�LULL.� �l;l;liliPl;lil9ilil,'1_q �7-1"1 11• Pi�iill lull llllflllllt i..-u ll 111 IIIII;IIIlllllll!Illl!III IIII[I�1!1!1!1 !1! II�I1�11, II I11�111�11'III II:' lll�l II;II� r:pi:li !i11111.11111111 11111111,111111mid: Ip'll'I'I(lili l;lii�l'Ijlnjlil;l51 _ i` IIIIII �'I"I Ill�fllll 1� ���.���.I®'���OIi IIII I'I•l �Illll.ltll. ;II �j,� IIIII; 1•� IIIII;111D a�\ C � 1 (1�'li III• Id: Illry f 'III'11"I1'I'lll'I'I .:I'11'I !I'I'IIa'I;'I ICI I'I"I'II'I'II'I'I II'IIxxIII'I'lll'I !!"I'%I'I' 1'I I;1'I'I;I'I'Ill''111'I'I;I'I'II'I'II'I'II'Ill'I11'I'I;I'I'lll'I'I;I'I'I;I'I'I;'h1� Illi�lj®®.11 IIIIII! I'I!I IIIIII'7III; IySy{ ^ .;y 'i l!I!Ill!I!lil!I!LIII!Ill !III!II�I!I!1:11!I.!lilll l!I'yl!IILI!III!I!lil l!IIIVIII!I!III!I![•11!:.I!I!Illlllil!Il�t!I!I:I!IIIII!I!I�I!I!III!lll!I!II!rlll!I lil!1!ICI!I!�I!I!ICI!I!ICI!I!I�!gal!1�111�!�11!I!I�III.�. illl!1.11!1;1� ..VV 2t�rec���:wrays z Rr��T�klbPQlkING7 �zF p 50) C7he „(ts`of ater' HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE SUBMITTAL 4i1 14 e i�i70.--..-.,AID AI.---.r_I� Il,i� ■1■III ■1= pp .11.1 ■ 111■I■I� I■I 1.�1 E.�. E�...O■o.o Emu „jli I11•0•11.■sIi.1s■ra■1■1■sI: U •III L11.7.171 lim::::,i1111.1:11--IIII1IIII I � InnIn� NI�IIIar ,a �s II�E i iNI �i P�:�.L�a ■ i,��.���Id■i` !i. kV 1.';, i' ®■[ii ��PI IOM NN 1 nu •_ MOM I IIt w2 MEE■ Ian 1j.L. It_ 0 :i Ei' .i.0 ■I—!1. . LEA 11 E NMI —Ur die itsof Jtavater' HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE SUBMITTAL 411 P ninnununniuniu�innnui MI 111 mmm11111nnumm4;l 1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItiINIIIIIIIIIl)U1111 r.•III! uunnunm0ummil mnmilim mnmt ALUMINUM HANDRAIL W/ GLASS PANEL EIFS CONE SEGMENTAL WALL J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD 903» ,>w:,411 a.M..E07 5555 ma AU Va.. om uBUMnuarz 6416PMZC0 0WNRS aB0[7[LIUR NOSCWf MIMrtCnMf cwa.¢ a a9 LlAldl' DEVELOPER. DATE 9fZV04 PROJECT NR. DESIGNED DRAWN i =om � 1 J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTd seeKlial NMMSml MU'NM¢S MtehSO 5e1 T. A Ax 14M^0 .wx Ao• Iran GENERAL NOTE ALL EIFS IS HIGH STRENGTH SHINGLES MIL ROOF CEMENT BOARD SHAKES MTL ROOF Eff S SHAKES EFS EIFS UNICLAO PANELS MODULAR BRICK PRECAST CONC EFS MY 'UP TOP SI li l WI1♦I1IIIM=1♦ 11111E 1e■ EIFS ALUMINUM HNORAIL W/ GLASS P' EL fi 411 MTL STAIRS �= W2 W2 mJ� E W2 W2 s W2 W2 .. = W2 W2 -y--�:- W2 EIFS O South Elevation • 12 —16 I IIIIIIllIHill uWW ®.--12 x12 H *place Vent ®«-8'x8 Brock Vent .-4 xi. Dryer Ve 1 I_.__■ II._I 1111 1❑■1.■■11.1 ' w9 I2i ■I�lll�li IIIIIIIII'1P4 W9 IIIHhIIIiJ! ®=1II ICI ■I_IIIIIIIIII■ I I I II III 1 I 1 1 1 L.I,1 EIFS !FIIIIIIIIIIIU MAN PLANING OPIMP*¢ OMMIINI*S MOnnnCNe NOSCM N10*nCNe GHMCS la -VISIONS DEVELOPER DATE 9/21101 PROTECT NR DESIGNED DRAWN w o� V r 5,1 �'!][L�iClkl�i < — 5 1' �" EE�EEi��EEI�■1111Ei1sl1 Fi ■ EEE i EEE1 r1.., iiii El.■1-■IEEEEEE■�I■1 �•�.EI•.�.�.rii�l LlE„l aii II'sik3 sS t q ,131431I 1! 1 1 L ( g i� ■ � �J �l� = 1'I Ili�iSrril tr !u7i.FraF 1§I[!3i!iI o :�.:allEi�ll�■IIIII= ;.; EEEE : imm ■■II,l ■, 11. —■ 1>•■■1111�11{ii1 1 1 k! E a 23 T! 7 r ICI ! S! 131I. iitiydirlt lll :i�s� � y„ .. ik4,i�° ��Iylpl��lXS��yl3�fE�i ililili!i3r:i I[ I ... \\ ._1Ii 4'r''�19?�l� ra . t fiifll ■ IIII �s3tf7dll�tr���d1\ �®1■ �I �, I,Iliilliili� 1 1 IIIIIIIIII�� i.ai�'(• �� Li1E!{'�NIO ,1"1 € I If'3iiiS13i13i1ir. Mil ©■ir iiiiiglk�Ii 'r©�y7 i[r� lire f1r4�.�?�3�� 12!''S�i{it��ly kl�ill�dtl�pii`4IL.$,^; w,■,■i!l11,� i ye I, I F ��i�0 ■ I; ©■la ©■�I h7p ®CE kill :®■ krSl�,tttili�Ji IIIIIIIII IIII II, i;fitli t pF r r i i l j ii'llls e il'l.Ci3 �IIIII liu `` i5i(ai tl�i 2t� �';����p�i c[I�llplilt� Il1il I ! �i� hlllllll AI {III jII �Fihior° ° l Ijli k t ii lak�q ,. IuLhifll tlt3 ,, llISS "19,i�i 9C lI'�IIyIr J1 IfiJ!I�I II1;1; w.ii, Il i■ell "V ,Iii will m\[ III m■ �■ yll�■� Imig I'1 ta■II ail „ .T1■al ���+ mo■ i �I■I1 ill " 'r . 1 IN! 1rltll s+l °':� !fa aarki i f;� rj°R 1 iti m iiii 1,1i1n■I I41r,■ r I�'� ii©■y' '__ 'il ly ■ 1 !- ` I� If;IL NJ �Il r ■)1 1,,rN[r? lil�llil 31 s!;YIII:f3i1•I�lkina ..IiI;I MEIVILMILI:I omm..m.....isimmigge Rim ■©1111®11110111 ■®aii IUIUl ■uI!i :1 '.i—■1 —■ wli�E>•I MIIIE>■IiI :': `ll I1 Ii� . I. yi14s*t f i i 1'1 Env IIEEEEEE■ ■; Ilti L� - li�iE■ ■ moil 11 'I! . NI '-"L _ IiBM'. -1111''�itg115l, .ifRA'IGG, nif �$:�'kt�•'111�11i 0: ;1,1;1; u4i i9.I i ii ICII4Y �4I "Inv f I. zrt {Ittoy io[ 1E1t 11 II 111.1.01 1.I.11 *° li I i s Ifi iE ! I, ■111 it SSSSPl!lfiL4 i ilt� nil IIIIIi1 I Ilp_p5 / y, =1E1 �1•Pd BtIP:f..ki tkiLEEit I i d'.r AMU IN Mil ' i:�iGii{i' d ®3■ CC jgii■� i^t y�{F�h ma), '1� :i,,,,,i „, `Rulej.',PlI �ITa' }�`-�_ iiiiiiiiili,., _3. f111i+ass>rl�i il.li i.ta.i.ililt III MIMIIII ■®■1� ®,Till®■llimmlMUNIIINNMEIMMIIIIIIIIMMIN .. .._. . _®.._■®.'I_.®.I_.•I_.®• II _ I_ ©I�ul :N -"I i13TL.i311::7 113,011 •"'rii �,� i� yi'I;II i I§+"'� 31". I i I h;lil �.....■ m+ �,■ IS E.I E 7■I■i1I■ 1�1 I—■ 11—■�.—■..I�1�.,�II 1111 i111 ii iit3l, l.'i;i&Li I i !!€4rt'i, e'd 1 0 mmi Ell I1011i�;r®ICE/ ' ,IWI 'lNM 1 s 1'1 uli?iraSSi aliisii"$�f�sl alilllkisE3ii�/' 1 . NM■Mil �■MUOE■IMIIIL !i EEEEtE■I■ MIIi ng EL _ I_'_I_I �1111 . 1—'■■I�■i■IIiiJ 'I 1'1 rvirlirli.HvIr„�EEtI•sMlltl�'1+ti si a iinxII r�i14y�1E1)il'1Ih Il►i I�rii i is I iFi �1 !I213� I11I.I�.ii ..IJPrlti1iI;•IIII ■I .4 III Jai€ f r��+s sla:>'ii �S s Etilk;llEil+lhiklflLi iiiiliii!iniiiilii:01 1 ■ IIII III I CIE■ M III `■1 E� ■ I �� cm"I�'■ IIII i■i,•_I I 1' 4rIali"hill ri. a,a xl,,aa yY I Ilia. _ '•. 1!I m■1 im■Irllllml M1-�1 i ®lei ®. iii ®ii llii !®11 ©I 1I.1®I I_! :ice ®:iii®: ill�i 4l ! !'j ! rf t' ?b rtir' 1 1�ii� 41r �p��! �q 4 i�, Iit� �I(!I ��19 I? 8r �fyl�I lJ�E�■I EEEEEE■fit n1 FI! !. 'k iI i{ �Irialli ■ i it 1 it s IIr �IF by {�I^y7 EE`�;Y�}-141Y MN Mk IIIIi- ■ I� EEEEEE■ ■ r 1 " _ ■ �L■ y I; ■y s�■IIII'ilI�F ■� ■1 1lES! gt 111 i[ Ii"Ii'Ilill � ill''I'al�i II, i tE Ilisal! II ,'. �♦i, �.t�tl � r,t�7 ©■ ©■Iolhljl!®1)5'll.•s,�lll ®.I ::',J,Iii:,:ii,411;tilliiiii731.2173—;;;121:,:i I IIjm ; iS� j! I!tluf ' i:i+� ��.° ®IIII i+ri�■®■ ■yE�■1 Il tl'i1r,g !qf� tl[4iF7 'i iii'i'iiiShclii� `.S is :235,1i aiv. l A, i;il lililkil 3 !.4'h 4!'h p®elI o®I•I�l . �O'8•1) ■gt !.�i1_.riiiiiSi1ill iwaiig®-■ua:iii©.i 9, J�{r ; !f{`5y°y !qlIIE� f �,��� IS Sjjj� iiyii)♦■! . +I �l l'iiL I i:`i l rldliit N, r lllli lilililillll! !1'IIIII®■I ®■1 II®■I N *) �'"- I iti I 1 i i d�iV tm•ii lo,R, l,iii, IM I I Sit 4"11�. .11.1i1.i7�[[llcni IIIIIIllitIII�immim ■I.r .l I • f1� ■- hari vi2Cil31�@IIII. 0 sj" Jtilaater' HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE SUBMITTAL 4i1 0 1 fr t / ry+f t. 1' 11 I ZiL 1/t f.� l 4m 4,4 f /4444. IP \1i 1 • 1 ; -3 1 L it rr r. 7 ..rr ... 'V.I.,. tz r' 1 I..-.,.-a...... _ 1 t�I 77��+s/ � ry,q a R j t jl 1 '1, \ \'11 I 2SACIrs'"‘ \ f�1i " —'' a.+,, 'y + + 1 11,L ly � j R f f 1 I /1111 I fil III ':;_:;:: ( ` 1 t ,/ > ,f^rF __1 ,` ( 4.7:7 f(j I f i• It T 7d11�/! { r r i 1 ` _tom- w` ` t r _-- 1 -. / ri 11 r 1 /11.,....,-77-_-e-r-, j(r ...Y hn 1 j tV 1 ,11 zJ r -- 3 / r 7-4 ittil A 10.11. •\..�s---"`—' ��-^-ram".-�e� -}•.ti A• ti C—.l�- •�.✓��� .I J \� tigGI-1[ • •i "'."1 { — t r —. —r—'.y +...-- APT—•ft:---- .— v—. •t — L —.r�� �j7Y1--—r—.• ti r t.,,;;;„) 1 gg-- 1 { r� S 1! f� 5 rvvit x an- - A The 'oits of Stillwater 501 North Mam City of Stillwater Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 2002 A group of twenty one neighbors represented by Bob Bonean, 709 W Willard Street, Chns Gerard, 719 W Willard Street and Scott Sheely, 716 M Marion Street were upset that Mr Wolff did not inform them about the plans for the land Mr Bonean expressed that the neighbors were concerned with the impact the subdivision would have on the neighborhood and drainage issues The group would like to get together with Mr Wolff to discuss these issues Council Representative Zoller informed the neighbors that deny the request since the subdivision meets all requirements Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to recommend approval of the subdivision request for splitting a 22,500 square foot lot into two Tots of 14,550 and 7,812 square feet located at 721 S Martha Street with the following conditions 1 Drainage and utility easements shall be provided around both new lots 2 The existing residence shall be connected to the city sanitary sewer and water systems 3 The existing septic system shall be decommissioned as required by the City Building Official Motion passed 7 fore, 1 against Case No V/02-70 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 11 7 feet proposed) for the construction of a new single family residence on lot north of 721 South Martha Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Bahr Construction, applicant Applicant needs to provide additional design detail If applicant decides not to go ahead with variance, he is still able to build a home that will meet City requirements Motion made by Council Representative Zoller, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to direct staff to send notice to the neighbors for the November Commission meeting If the vanance is dropped the neighbors would not receive a meeting notice Case No SUPN/02-72 A special use permit for a 59 unit multifamily condominium building with variances to maximum height (50 feet, 4 stories allowed, 5 stories 54 feet 11 inches proposed), front yard setback (15 feet required, 6 inches proposed) and rear yard setback (20 feet required and 10 feet 8 5 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 2002 inches proposed) at 501 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District The Lofts of Stillwater Inc represented by J Buxell Architecture, Ltd , applicant The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the project design and it was conceptually approved subject to several conditions The Commission directed staff to work with the applicant to refine the plans, including the engineenng, landscape and flood protection plans The location of the building will be in the Floodplain District The Department of Natural Resources is reviewing the site plan and parking garage, and will direct the developer in terms of what flood proofing standards must be met Mr Buxell requested a use permit and four variances for a 59 unit condominium project The units will range in size from 1200 square feet to 3800 square feet The building will consist of four residential floors of wood frame construction over a concrete underground parking garage Mr Buxell proposed a fifth floor party room and open air deck which all would be tucked under into the river side of the hipped roof All resident and guest parking will be underground, two parking spaces per unit The exterior facade of the building will primarily be brick and glass with stone trim The site is 1 44 acres Monty Brine, 402 and 450 N Main Street was concerned about the impact the residential area would have on Downtown Mr Brine is not against the development Commissioner Ranum felt the development is out of character, the size is not compatible and he is concerned about the lack of setbacks Commissioner Teske felt the development won't extend the downtown look and he is also concerned about the lack of retail, however he is glad to see more residents Motion made by Council Representative Zoller, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to approve SUPN/02-72 with the following conditions 1 The building shall be designed in conformance with the State Building Code Floodproofing regulations 2 The structure shall be designed in conformance to FEMA guidelines 3 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent 6 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Minutes October 14, 2002 4 properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected from damage by vehicles 5 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 6 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscaped areas 7 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 8 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 9 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project 10 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall taken to prevent damage during construction activity 11 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 12 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 13 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise Ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 14 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 15 Grading and drainage plan shall be approved by the City Engineer before building permits are issued 16 Sign package shall be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 17 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approve by the Heritage Preservation Commission 18 All security lights on building shall be down lit 19 A sign permit is required for signage 20 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Community Development Director 21 Park dedication shall be required Motion passed 7 fore, 1 against OTHER ITEMS - Boutwell Area Plan Council referred 7 1 in s0 b0 --I - J1 -147 -19 Li 17711 1 )I 1. I I_ 1' J II tT�r -Ji__ L I r II I - _ ,I � = 1 I �f I lr I 1 II 1 I I1I s I1 MI 1 aµ C the s of LStiaater' 501 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 7 1 i I I�' K 0 r __ II I ,/ 1 I r— II 1- 1 1 I II II I 4 __I.. r T1 F 4 1 -1 1.1 I I r -r } r 88$ 2 die4ftsijStili°water' 501 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA J BUXELL i II II II r =I _ .1 (D i>AIGK- {' a I I I _ I I {1 a-µ pee - L r1 —71 I -114 -ci -6- - 77E I � •� .� - rD 1� I y Wr'TLL-CJ _ ,0s ( N O F-TH 15 fzr.V ) ARCHITECTURE LTD NORTHSWON STREET MN EA10LLS MINNESOT 540 I I5TB3 MRI 1113.3040 URBAN PLANNINa, OPENSPACECOMMUNMES ARCHITECTURE LANDSLAPE ARCHITECTURE GRM CS HEREOF CERT Y THA THIS PLAN SPL I ICA ON OK REPORT WAS PREPARED ME 00. UNDE 1Y DIR CT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A DUI. REGIST ED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STA Of NUNNE.1ETTA 0.EG NO (41%gb,,, NORTH 0 SCALE o rg tOV STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SOUTH ELEVATION DATE PROJECT DESIGN DRAWN SHEET 623.2001 1005 00 0000.00 0000 00 A3 2s r 1 0 (J\ 0 T J o N 6 1 4 O (._ -2 "LC_ Inv) + db 1p 4 — — sh tsmara "tie £pJtsijStiltwater' 501 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA opiv ajit lay #Q X s HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-42 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location 212 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Kevin and Jody Nyenhuis Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of signage and an awmng for the In Studio Discussion On July 7, 2004, the Commission approved the extenor modifications proposed for the building The applicant's are now requesting design review and approval a signage package and for an awning The signs proposed are a six square foot projecting lit sign, and a small 6 inch by 3 feet non -illuminated sign in the walkway for the second floor tenant The illuminated sign will be downht with small lights shining directly on the sign The proposed awning will not have the name of the business on it One sign per business is permitted by the ordinance in this district The applicant's will have the projecting sign with the name of the business on it They may have something like "graphic design" or similar words on the valance of the awning Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Hentage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage 3 Sign shall not be lit internally 4 Awning shall not have name of business on it 5 Awning will not be lit 6 The awning will be at a one to one pitch 7 Structural elements of the awmng shall be at least eight feet above the sidewalk 8 The awning valance shall be at least seven feet above the sidewalk 9 The design of the wall graphic shall be approved by the HPC Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Letter/Elevation Photos Case No i9 04- Date Filed (, - ?A -al -- Receipt No.: e 3 Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is reauired PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 212.q,� >T N Assessor's Parcel No 28.030 Zp Zoning District Description of Project in detail (Z cipA, ti i Pc5 s- aN on- u/A-11s 00%nw Doom 1 nIV)Ow $ Ns (uN OS: E-)C'rW 2icv2 5I CI c s A-G C. A-N O •Avj N I j 4 / UIT+f,-nes Sc, �t�N(,‘ "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner I4v+,i .io ' N i z s Representative Mailing Address 4,,? City State Zip Telephone No �.� 1 `13 3 37 3c S'atel 5 -)13 0—20120 Mailing Address l01 F r a (A City State Zip 41J NK_ Si c_ ,_ nl H \mcnamara\sheila\2002\design review permit wpd Telephone No April 12, 2002 r ir D'i b4--- '- DESIGN REVIEW - 212 Main Street North (second filing) Sept 27, 04 C Site Development 3 Signage As Indicated sl Name of business (instudio) applied to window of building in outlined form We are requesting the awning option remain open for the future installation - dark gray to black in color The hardware from the original awning is still in place and would be utilized Trim Color to be Slate Blue Stucco repair to take place next season and to be of a natural color complimenting the brick facade s2 Overhead signage or awning sign An overhead sign would be at a right angle over the doorway Metal fabricated, lit but not self illuminated and of a size scaled to the facade ' s3 Wall Graphic (approx 8'w x 10'h) as option for marketing - content TBD We understand that it cannot be the name of the business s4 Small hanging (non illuminated) sign in walkway for current 2nd floor tenant Thank you, Kevin Nyenhuis 212 Main Street North w 430-2040 c 247-7399 r 40 xY Viama _ #ZSIi'351€w�'�is Lss sY SI `f>N-h - •i �u°..?..� ' 7'2": J�r-. i,�rt.��;�„,'`"� `^rA- ` v,-..'> + xr'�'Fti,`'Tr TP:'''-' `j- r ,.F"tii.�n'}„'-- fix ' a... ,i -"'s r,- � -- : - , '' a_� = 7.,a i u- --,%.ti.s• '5 ti ;...�:'.,.`` 7, y siyi v,� +n,. a gp > u..,? ,..Ly � -t; "� ". Thl .5 a �'2 t =-,� .` Q `rS .n a 4 . }'h��'`"�,2�Y �q+ �r a '� _��7 _ ,, a q 'a �� - �.. i�i'�,�$ti+`> ter-'+ ✓is�'r7.' r rS d ' s„f .� R.4 s ,¢ xt-' v "1 .�- .m L 7* Ra-,, a2 �w.i.. — r 'ir�.`�''_" b+P.-.,w," ` " J �v..t�ra ice. e., , j E �r �� d'L.- =f= r 't�4'xTh � to {s r-,. } 4'E� w i. f,� T 1 ss -t+ rJ1c .Y 71 ^a z �h� ey..r "' � > x z . �"� f`'- t > s �-..,� F a �. "`Iv.i � -.`'7 e� __m_hxkx r a -A. -M , .'.'+ _ - -----"- "` �, ^�=..•.r-:e-rr^^—s„� p.-.....' .3 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-47 Heritage Preservation Date October 4 2004 Project Location 452 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Terri and Monty Brine Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of a sign package for the 450 Building Background Cornerstone Gifts presented a sign for HPC approval at the August 2, 2004 meeting The sign was denied due the fact that a sign package for the entire building had never been approved The applicant appealed to the City Council and was approved providing a sign package for the building and the Cornerstone Gifts sign be part of the HPC approval process Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a sign package for the 450 Building The address sign would be on the south and east sides The background would be the same color as the trim, rust color There could be potentially four other retail businesses that would each have a 2 foot by 8 foot sign All signs would be within the same "sign band" area Signage will be similar to their building to the south, Isaac Staples Sawmill (photo attached) None of the signs will be lit Cornerstone Gifts is requesting approval for a 2 foot by 8 foot sign The sign will be blue letters on a white background The logo colors will be black and blue This sign will not be lit as stated above Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photos 1 _Hu4 11 4-i b14JUJ 11' IT OF =TILL' I"Ttr Case No . ,:F.) 0i Date Filed % • l • 041' Receipt No Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (0 e photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFXCATION Address of Project 45-0 L1 r & St- Assessor's Parcel No ,,Jcctlt rwu > S 4 2_ Zoning District Description of Project in detail Dudo,/ at er "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify X will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner 5PO E2i1JE Mailing Address el )'1 „ City State Zip S f 'Telephone No `-(3 P _2=% S-477 Representative Czr46#4for 6r S Mailing Address 44So iv l` ( S&eJ City State Zip Sfi llw&ter wlSs63-Z Telephone No Cos 1-1-I-3g-4O Z H \mcnamaralshella\2o02\deslgn review permit wpd April 12, 2002 i 4 � �. n���); �r�p Company Cornerstone Gifts 651-439-4062 Proposed Sign 2' x' 8' outdoor sign Proposed Sign Location 450 North Main Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 Cornerstone Gifts, Inc. 450 North Mam Street, Strfwater, M.N 55082 651-439-4062 phone eh' fax July 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Cornerstone Gifts, Inc moved from 324 South Main Street, Stillwater, MN on May 15, 2004 We are now operating business at 450 North Main Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 We respectfully request permission from the City of Stillwater, Community Development Department, to display an outdoor sign with our business name and logo at our new location, 450 North Main Street, Stillwater MN - - - -- ------ - --- Corporation of the State of Minnesota Incorporated in May of 1992 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-58 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location 1754 Market Drive Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicant's Name Kevin Knoop Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of rear signage for Papa Murphy's Pizza Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a 24 inch high individual channel Iettenng that says 'Papa Murphy's Pizza' in red This sign is constant with the other signs that are on the back of the center Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage Findings The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photo SEP-30-2004 08 40A FROM 09/29/2004 10 18 6514308810 CITY OF STILLWATER TO 4306810 P 2 PAGE 01/03 case INo. Date Filed. Receipt No.' Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FoRM r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required All supporting material (s.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project...MA tv)P W. r_ t7AK Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Description of Project in detail 1 Mu_S . _ Ei Pr = ttr1»L , 511c � t 4t4l Lik21111Portilt5 Milt 414 Spdd 9rci.d,J 7hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief to be true and coact. Xfurther certify I will comply with the permit ifItisgrantee! and used" If representative Is not property owner, then property owners signature is required Property Owners p fti 4TtuwktigtLARepresentative_ Mailing Addressjf i winot44. ve. Mailing Address City State Zip tocopB 1414 5'526 City State Z p .,,__, 'Telephone No. l0t2. 7l3 4`l Telephone No `✓finivw Fi Nmatamara'1s1'tei(a12002‘destgn review permitwpd Apr1112, 2002 SEP-29-2004 WED 10 14AM ID PAGE 1 a Sep 30 04 10 28a KEVIN KNOOP 6514641844 p 1 To Sue Fitzgerald From Kevin Knoop Date 09/30/04 1 1[tegardrng Papa Murphys Total number of pages including cover 2 1 A CS i M ilL-.! , ]Phone number for follow-up 651-308-5572 Attached is the sign for the back of Papa Murphys It is letter "B" with the 2 foot letters Papa will be red and Murphys will be green Just like the sign in the front of the store Jay will be faxing you the design review application form. Thanks for your help Kevin Knoop t SIZE OPTION p 1b aUUaRc Et1 1— — — SIZE OP 1 ION /R SOLPRE ILLI 10 6 �_ APa MeoP/#1a.' 0 -7_ 14 1 pia /qap SIZE OPTION I SUUAR FFF1 — --- 11 6 h = 1 -0 DO NOT COPY OR DISTRIBUTE Va MieeP/N,4- Illuminated channel letter wall signs THREE size options Construction Aluminum 040 returns and 063 IlaLks Return depth 5 Return color Dark Oriranodlc Bronze Turn cap 1 Duranodic Jawelile Irim cap Faces 3/16 acrylic Illuminallon Neon tubing PAPA colors //2157 Red lace wdh Clear Red neon illuminalton (01,UE MURPHY colors d 2108 Green with EGL GICLA neon II/umination 4J J." Artwork .As shown Registered R disk While acrylic with green tilnyl mount Ilal to wall not Illuminaled Eleclncal Remole install Wily access Detail of typical remote transformer install S —E-1 n IIW.CA. - GAM) NE ML OI a s-Ona tItMNNION Ur USW CPA IBI G PUSt c1 — ALUMMJM fEnmw AND BACKS PP LAC SCR.. I' as ro Btuwonlel W7 tTRCowuEC1$ .110r WOUND MEW. BCC 1 l GA W111E TO aver. CCtrAdACUI N moo, Amu wwt ypx'tl wood woll vEe ry wtbl COAL! uChO PapaMieo SIGN PROGRAM Illuminated channel letters - remote Install Papa Murphy's 2003 Prnaer.allon for Papa Murphy: Pim various Iocaltans Drawing Number LS 545 03 R WO Number Bid Number 09034 Dale of original draMng 0/18/03 Sales 99 Design LS Revisions Z2103 (L5 487 03 RI 1 Add 30 sel of Idlers 2 LED illumination t d of neon 125/03. (IS ,r00-03 t@ Change back to neon Wxilo d Approval This desgn preaedation Is the property d MA* and Awning Co. N rghls to N use 'Itemg, ep adumo ere proleded nth N amden perdu! ESA SIGri 8 Al/iilfiC CO C soli T/0 9 /rl ph 541-485 5546 lax 541-485 5813 12 0orWala. Pa Uwe Deg9n97r02 Revised 9/10/03 to m w O O 0 IV 03 CU d001.01 1.1IA3) ba8Tb9bIS9 IU HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-59 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location 1250 Frontage Road Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicant's Name Cynthia Mettling Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of signage for Cynthia's Bridal Company Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a 30 square foot sign The sign ordinance requirements for wall signs in this district is the gross area of a sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building parallel or substantially parallel to the front line The sign is in red lettering and will be individual channel letters on a raceway Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional lettering Findings The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photo r SEP-24-2004 01 39 PM CYNTHIA METTLING 7634279287 P 02 O1N 401 itl$ I iO. OP 011I406110i6 WV V ,p 711 itIiNM iam rim Oi/ I • c.N NSI h°r :5 `i D Rol Pit 1U,Oo ja „PRI9,14 RAIRIOr AirmicATIOti R CCIMMUNITY A 011PARcfNiiNlf aw Of STAMINA- • gig � 1,AINII.MN NNW IMI The appgaint M for the teomplatene■o and acsuraw of an forme and ouppottbno nurterlal m o w In connection with may uppIaeNan. Photos, sZtatchas and p Mat of !runt is ntrwd. AU supporting(I" plow, ma stIal low, weir xnt au taad v h app ortton beanies the prop", of the Cloy of Wen Pomtean (1.4) agog of nil Swank* nnabellgid la required. All Masts 1nfmrrraigOn I gdighid. PROPINTY SINIITIFICATion aes of prom*1 l St f n Mdt W�An seleo:% mil No, 3 9. -030 - ao -44-co L� O3e .6P..... paa1pt i of WOW 1n OUR 1 f LA &At alto . AttiArtylettaqt art ��i■ m - -- n irr.rr ��.�...� ., —w. a i.■■+.+n.r+r��.�r�i i w w�rw.�� Vilm t ra too o M. "WOO I� mad al A ration end q ae Rrladl. ww m a room*to Metoot of a• atIbalk& lobo inn swig orovottt1 oad +J1 1fIbpnnodowl We to r if >pINNOTANOss Is nay piopaily owner, 4'ten, prop! rty awes drug?* Is Aigmbe Niiparty Owner t0 copnviA"S Ming Parma. 1 tt1J,_cs,a4. Wing Mol aqr 1 4a i. ti. f j �^: S' o► sisx a ' ho�.a j, Di o z303 •l hptona No, (PT •'15'l Cie k. o TelspP one No. ' - /an-- T''''''' tAA, Nrcrverk, ecC.. • sO•d a° f aN .LBziLE0201 9NI1id.9W WININ.49 WW 9* WI WOW,. Z-426 andarw ■Wu.Doriiue appapi► LLauk* racud n A n■O one nn !A ■AA' •7 2U0 1-4/Nic301 • • WHERE THE WORLD GOES FOR SIGNS au" REVIEW CAREFULLY, THIS REFLECTS FINISHED PRODUCT! Please approve, sign and fax back If approval is missing or Is not received, the production schedule for your order may change (051- 1 7- ;_o 5:5 ( Color Spelling Size 2950 White Bear Ave. Maplewood, MN 55109 (651) 773-2055 FAX (651) 773-2066 ri5" aoi.) Approve http //www.signarama.com/55109 e-mail sarbob@mcteodusa net Change All designs remain property of Si n A Ra ord om leted and paid In Sign 0 30 -.7/ HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-60 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location 1260 Frontage Road Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicant's Name Daniel J Nault — Jones Sign Nationwide, representing applicant Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of an exterior sign for Aerial Beauty Supply Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of an exterior sign for Aerial Beauty Supply located in Valley Ridge Mall The sign will have a 4 square foot black and European Blue logo with the word `Aerial" in European Blue on a raceway painted to match the building color The applicant is well within the 30 square feet permitted for that site Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage Findings The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photo 09/24/2004 10 50 FAX 920 490 4923 89/24/2004 10,05 6514300910 Jones Sign CITY OF STILLWATER 0 002 PAGE 02/03 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25,00 DESIGN REVIEW APPL4CATIQN FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and SUPPorting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is require d. Att.PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Proje e E - - Assessor's Parcel No 030 - 00 l h Hwy Zoning District �Q-� W+esar G. Description of Project in detailT2 A- c ED "l hereby stab!: foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted belrewith in al respectg, to the best of Im0W! edge and belief to be true usedand correct l twiner certify: will comply with the Remit ifItis granted and If representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature Is egr4 eA Property Ownerr.k MUC IA) r,v1.11 S- Represents Mailing Address-10-1 k%.- 34-''- Cr v Mailing Address a� E rg ► c�.r.PA", y Oty State _ Vl i'1 .(,L4- U(il r� ??flc" City State Z1p_ -BAY, \*f1 54343 Telephone No. (91 k- l l (l t b Telephone No C cizo) 41a r Li 110 7c t s s N- (LAI-A NiWit " j"Qfe"'a 651130o , perm Lw pd Arm 22, 2002 41. O CV CV 9'-pee, -4 2'-'/2" 3M-220-10 Black 6'-2" 3M-3630-137 European Blue Lit Channel Letters on Building (Qty:1) 1] Letters Constructed From .040" Pre -Finished White Routed Letter Backs & 5" White Letter Coil Returns. 2] Letter Faces Routed From 3/16" White Plexiglass With European Blue Vinyl Applied First Surface. Color 3M 3630-137 3] Letter Faces Held To Returns w/ 1" Standard White Jewelite Trim -Cap. 4] Letters Internally Illuminated With White Neon. 5] Letters Mounted To A Standard &"x&" SignComp Extruded Aluminum Raceway. 6] Raceway Painted To Match Building Color - T.B.D. 7] 60 ma Transformer To Be Mounted Inside Raceway. Photo: N.T.S. FIELD SURVEY REQUIRED r e),-� SIGN NATIONWIDE www.jonessign.com 711 Hinkle Street Green Bay, WI 54303 Phone: 920-494-6740 Fax: 920-494-2313 Customer: / Aerial Beauty Supply / Date: / 9/09/04 Location: / Valley Ridge / Sales: / G. Gregor City/State Stillwater, MN /Drawn By:/ J. Manders REVISIONS COMMENTS. Bid #: 18328 /Q FinalLogoArtwork / CUSTOMER SIGNATURE: X Scale: 1 "=1'-0" Sq. Ft. Needed From Customer DATE: gFie/dSurveyRequired /Sketch# 118328-1 pg l inn is an bnonal, unpolnlW drawing by fines sfgn co., Inc It a for your personal use, m cbntumton w0b a page[( berg panned Ion you by ab ea Srgn Co It is not m be show, o apme ouh.de of your organu.anm nor ad to be used repoduled rowed or esn,bted in any fash,on. Use of fhs deign or the sabot elertwnn of did devgn in arty von dare by any other mmpan, wanour the etpress wanen pwmntun of Axles Sgn a .bdlen by raw and came, a cnal torte.mn. or up to 25% of the purchase pent. of Ow sago JONES StiN will endeavor to closely march robs arradag /M$ where spooled. We cannot guarantee exact matches due to ranvmg tomp.snbhly of sonar• rnateroh and pama used All saes and drmensrofu are 'bothered for (bents mm.pfon of po,rrr and are not ro be unde,5food es being exact size or eaatt scan HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-61 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location 1820 Market Drive Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicant's Name Mike Lean — Taurus Sign Co and Diane Savino, applicant Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of exterior signage for Ponies Sports Bar & Grill Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval for Ponies Sports Bar & Grill The front of the will have the `P' 36' high The rest of Ponies will be 24" high by 10 feet long 'Sports Bar & Grill will be 12' by 13' The rear side Iettenng, the 'P' will be 24 and the rest of Ponies will be 18' high by 24' long The lettering will be red face channel letters on a raceway painted to match the building Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage Findings The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form/Elevation Photo Case No. )U D e-4 1 Date Filed: q - 2 -o 4c. Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required All supporting material (i e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 0.'a‘O 1 {1cctI{. Ifi Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Description of Project in detail "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner DtQN‘, .<j Rob Mailing Address 14-D 5 S. SixST- City State Zipmj , rl1 IQ Telephone No LI3c1 _ -1tD 'L, Representative -5.‘,1\5 5.3?. C-o M4Ct L\ Mailing Address Race )c t st City State Zip 'Si Pam\ N* 55\b3 Telephone No (5 l- e.)? 5- 5 0 8 1 H \mcnamara\sheiia\2002\design review permit wpd Apnl 12, 2002 rPRn, LC )j\�k I HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-61 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location Liberty on the Lake Village Comprehensive Plan District Village Commercial Zoning District VC Applicant's Name Greg Rick — Tanek Archecture, representing the applicant Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of a new construction restaurant, Cafe Cravings Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a 4700 square foot restaurant, Cafe Cravings The extenor design of the restaurant will compliment the rest of the colonial village facade The 46 seat, interior and 23 seat exterior restaurant will be both a bar and restaurant Lighting will match the rest of the development The applicant will bring a cut of the building lighting to the meeting Landscaping is continued from the approved master plan The building will have a dark gray asphalt roof The gables will have blue/gray cedar shakes The building will be painted a rust color The trash receptacle will be concealed There will be signs on the north and south sides of the building, white lettenng on a rust background on the south side and white lettenng on a gray background on the north side Neither sign will not be lit Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height, location and extenor lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All hghting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles 3 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 4 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 5 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 6 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 7 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry matenal, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and matenals of the project 8 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage dunng construction activity 9 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 10 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 11 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction dunng the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 12 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 13 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 14 Sign package to be approved by the Hentage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 15 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 16 All security lights on building shall be downlit 17 A sign permit is required for signage 18 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Hertiage Preservation Commission Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Liberty development guidelines Attachments Application Form/Pre-Construction Drawings 'PI - Case No: SY-LO `i" CeZ Date Filed: Receipt No. Fee: $25,00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OP STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET '' STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted In connection with any application. All supporting material (1.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following lnlbrmabon is required. amylPROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Pro y ' ,e! Assessor's Parcel No. Zoning District; Description of ProjectLn detal {,W Soo I hereby stale the foregoing statements and all data, information and s P evidence submitted herewith in ail respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct t further certify! will comply with the pain* lf kis granted and used' If representative Is not property owndr, then property owner's signature is require. Property Owners eb Mailing Address � 0;3 Lt �yy, City State Zlp�_L4hwwoo4 Mr) rl S51l Q Telephone.,klo. 2J . q9,41 4$ Signature, Representative �pr�° 12.1 Mailing Address itvyyw City State Zip Telephone No Signature f\DPrT' C,f4 lmrnamarelsheUalshellaldeslgn review perrnitwpd February 5,2003 "* spirit o f a New Eng(an Vitiage" Prepared for Greg Rick - Cafe Cravings On behalf of PDC tacek crrcl„ leclrr,c specially ,nil/wort vittudl yr run protect nr rndgen,crit 118 E 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis MN 55404 P 612 879 8225 F 612 879 8152 www tanek com COVER I I CRAVINGS LIBERTY l- I Ih bycertfy thatlh pl pec fcat o p rt was p epa d by m o d my ects p ry a dthatl m a dulylce d chi clu de th I ws of the lat fm esota name date license number project # scale name CITY REVIEW 9/24/04 T-1 • LOCAL COLOR ROOFING CAST STONE BASE SIDING OPTIONS DETAIILS CHARACTER ta ek 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com CRAVINGS - LIBERTY I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota, name date license number: material and detail CITY REVIEW 9/24/04 M-1 COLOR OPTIONS i J lit a) t VENUE NORTH \ / / \ — / // ANNING AVENGE- N 7737., NO I I1 1 / / ,, - i ice/' / \ � /7/ / % ��/ `�� \ >//>Xc`t's " \ / ye,/ / / / //\ \ %t\\L i 7/ / • \ \\\\ • N � i < % \ \ \ \ \� \\\L--i 1L--Jl__1L • l TION /,',Sir —44 >/// // // rr II 11 I I II architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118 E 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P 612-879-8225 F 612-879-8152 www tanek com cafe cravings liberty on the lake Stillwater, MN 55400 I hereby certify that this plan specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota name date license number scale name city review 9/24/04 P1 • rev ■ INC 9-4 N N 111Lylji1IMI 4.\\iEEiiR. r.. nl: frllI — u IN.it 1 46 30-0 1/2 MAIM 23-11 1/4 OHM IDdl SERVER O it \\\ \\\ BIN INN - • 11(11 r - r I( mg EXTERIOR SEA= 'a/ I II I ftip ti- 18-1 1/2 30-9 1/2 18-11 i' architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118 E 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P 612-879-8225 F 612-879-8152 www tanek com cafe cravings liberty on the lake Stillwater, MN 55400 I hereby certify that this plan specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota name date license number scale name city review 9/24/04 1- i J m BIKE PARKING o] O LL---- ITC P] 0 WAITRESS PREP/ BAR SERVICE AREA r-. BAKERY/TO GO StIFT SEATING -CASHIER ENTRY tz VESTIBULE O FF BANQUET SEATING t j j f � CD H OU OOR Fi2EPLAC 0 m r 1 H L OPEN SEATING d ZFP SHORT TERM SEATING BAR 1 C) DDD OPEN SEATING 1 �n EXTERIOR SEATING t architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118E 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P 612-879-8225 F 612-879-8152 www tanek com cafe cravings liberty on the lake Stillwater, MN 55400 I hereby certify that this plan specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota name date license number scale name city review 9/24/04 P3 coffee pastry I dinner EAST ELEVATION A3 j 1/8"=1'-0" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AIL/I � � 11► l�l l�l ICI 1011111 1111111 1111111 IIIIII :11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII.IIIIII SOUTH ELEVATION coffee ] r.' dinner taek ,,l< 1, n• ttl,. Inill�w��rk vutndl vision piOitl tn�dna�{r�rnFnf 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com ELEVATIONS CRAVINGS - LIBERTY I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota. name date license number: project # scale: name: CITY REVIEW 9/24/04 E-1 A3 % 1/8"=1'-0" IMF IIIIIIIIII WEST ELEVATION 11 �1� L1111 1.1 11 1LI • IIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIItll hil"IIIIIlIlII1IIIIII • \ / • , J II III QQ IG I:II 171Mia "`9G •••• •• I ��QtiQ�Q W�I�lIlIl IIIIIIIIIII�IIII IIIII1III�IIIII�" A2 j 1/8"=1'-0" 2 NORTH ELEVATION 1 /8"=1'-0" III • , III • / III MN ! wlw,u EEL iiiiiiiii ' liiiiiiiiii 1JJJJ1 1 taek .11C IIIteC till E-' specitjlty rnill,voll virtt1.11 vlti ion project nmanageniolit 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com ELEVATIONS CRAVINGS - LIBERTY I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota. name date license number: project # scale: name: CITY REVIEW 9/24/04 E-2 • HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-63 Heritage Preservation Date October 4, 2004 Project Location Sam Bloomer Road and Water Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Keith Becklin Type of Application Review Project Description Review of carriage rides in the downtown area Discussion The applicant is requesting review of a horse drawn carnage rides during the months of May through September on Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays, on holidays and holiday weekends The holiday Christmas season would include any days of the month in November and December The applicant is going to the Planning Commission on October 11, 2004 to request a three year Special Use Permit effective immediately The applicant is also requesting a twenty foot area downtown, this would be the pickup/drop off point The route taken by the carriage would be around the river on Sam Bloomer Road and Water Street The vehicle used would be a Vis-a-vis Carriage (1800 reproduction with hydraulic brakes and electric lights — holds 6 — 8 passengers) hitched to a Belgian draft horse The unit will have a equine waste basket attached Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form Case No' Date Filed Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required All supporting material (il e photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Assessor's Parcel No S 2A-Dorn Zoning Districtfl) Description of Project in detail "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property OwnerC-r� Representative i'T"N 1_ L-11 1 Mailing Address Mailing Address • •O •11) City State Zip City State Zi Telephone No Telephone No l --1 13 7 H \mcnamara\sheiia\2002\design review permit wpd Apnl 12, 2002 T BECKLIN'S TRAINING STABLES 36960 Grandy Pines NE Stanchfield, MN 55090 08-02-04 Jay Kimbele Stillwatei City Council City of Stillwatei 216 North 4th Stieet Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear MI Kimbele, I would like to pi ovide Carnage Rides to individuals in the City of Stillwatei during the months of May thi ough September on the weekends to begin this year and possibly again for up the coming yeas if all goes well with this service The vehicle I would be using would be a Vis-a-Vis Can iage (1800 r epr oductron with hydi aulic brakes and electnc lights - holds 6 to 8 passengers) hitched to a Belgian draft horse The unit I will use does have a equine waste basket attached to the vehicle The horse would be tiaileied in, I would need the size of 2 to 3 parking spaces located close to when e I will be pioviding rides The aiea I would like to use foi travel is along the river front - open to suggestions The pick up point I am interested in is close to the nver boats/cave touts and the di op of point is the same or open to discuss My back ground as it relates to horses consists of 32 years experience as a professional 3'd generation horse Hamner Interested in pi ovrdrng carnage ndes as a hobby I believe the availability of a hoise di awn vehicle would enhance the atmosphere of the City of Stillwatei providing people with an experience of how it was to get around in the 1800's Hoise di awn Can rages are a large part of Amer man History I am proud to promote I would like to present my request to the City of Stillwater at a upcoming board meeting I can be reached at the address above by written correspondence and by telephone at (763)689-5009 Thank you foi your consideration I look forward to meeting with the City Council Members r egai ding the contents of this request Sincerely, Keith L Becklin BECKLIN'S TRAINING STABLES 36960 Grandy Pines Road N E Stanchfield, MN 55080 08-12-04 Sue Fitzgerald Stillwatei City Council City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Sti eet Stillwatei, MN 55082 Dear Sue, This is an addendum to the lettei sent to Jay Kimbele's attention dated 08-02-04 See copy attached Changes to lettei dated 08-02-04 are as follows 1) instead of 2 to 3 parking spaces need a minimum of 20 feet, 2)The ioute further defined could be Sam Bloomei Road and Water Sti eet, 3,) Time frame I would be pi oposing - a 3 year special use permit for special events in the town, Holidays, Holiday Weekends to include the Christmas Season(any day during month of November and December) Fi idays, Satui days and Sundays foi the months of May through Septembei The effective date proposed would be as soon as possible Please send me and Robin Scholl agenda information foi the meetings I need to present my request to pi ovide Can iage services in the City of Stillwatei These meetings as I understand it are Park and Rec - August 30, 2004, Design View (Hentage Preservation Commission) Septembei 8''' 2004 and Paiking Commission (yet to be determined) Keith Becklin at address listed above Robin Scholl - 31201 Polk Street N E Cambridge, MN 55008 If you need further information please contact Robin Scholl (763)689-7132 or Keith Becklin at (763)689-5009 Thank you foi your assistance thus far with this process Since' ely, al I &Xi '‘-' o, /Ids Keith L Becklin (0) -37 Veterans l(emorlaf Memorial to Veterans of Stillwater Area Schools PO Box 137, Stillwater, MN 55082-0137 • Phone 651-439 7796 • Fax 651 439-4350 9/3/04 Mayor Jay Kimble and City Council Stillwater MN 55082 Re Veterans Memorial Stillwater MN Dear Mayor and City Council Enclosed are the following attachments • Veterans Maintenance Agreement (green) • Cub Foods parking usage (yellow) • Cub Foods letter dated 9/2/04 (blue) • Site plan showing paver expansion and Memorial upgrade (white) • Larson -Brenner plans/details (white) Narrative • Veterans Maintenance list • Maintenance by Veterans Committee within boundaries of the Veterans Memorial • Veterans Committee pays all costs ■ Snow plowing details to be determined Xlv,�,��`��� ■ Call Veterans Memorial (Dick Olsen — 439-5410) if there are any issues to be added • Cub parking lot usage \ �,�f✓ • Numbers listed are open parking spaces not being used vV • Handicap spaces have not been used by Cub • Cub approval letter ■ Veterans Committee (i e , Dick Huelsmann and Dick Olsen) met with Dennis Arth of Cub Foods on Wednesday 9/1/04 Site plan (note item numbers are listed on site plan) • #2 1) relocate lower parking lot light pole Pole is a distraction to the 'Wall of Honor" ti ❑ Lighting study will be completed by the Veterans Committee to be sure there is proper lighting of the lower parking lot This study will be sent to City staff before lighting pole would be relocated Honoring Our Heroes, then, now, and forever of the communities within School Distract #834 Page #2 • Site Plan (con't) • #2 2) Service flagpoles/flags at the top of the north retaining wall \1111-/D ❑ Same locations as existing temporary flagpoles o Flagpoles will be 15'0" high or 20'0" high ■ #2 3) 15" letters (i e , "Veterans Memorial") ❑ In the center of the wall for visibility from 3rd Street ■ #2 4) Permanent donor plaque ❑ Plaque will be same as 'Wall of Honor" plaques 1 Agr' • #2 5) Literature box (optional) o Installation to be determined o This will contain information on the Memorial including order form for granite pavers • #2 6) Lighting of interior of steeple o This is to better Tight the steeple o Veterans Committee will review with city staff before lighting is installed • #2 7) Remove existing Cub Foods flagpole at the corner of Pine Street and 3rd Street • #2 8) Granite paver expansion o The demand for pavers continues Currently we have orders for 981 pavers o The Pine Street expansion (orange) will add 40 pavers and the sidewalk to 4th Street (pink) will add 156 pavers This will allow 1096 total pavers City staff approved these areas because they didn't change any parking o Yellow area will add 356 • av- _ -1 of 1452 pavers • There is a loss o Initial des • = = ng 2 of the 4 parking spaces • Veterans Committee will re-establish the location of the handicap parking spaces as per direction of the City staff If you have any questions, call Dick Huelsmann (439-4300) or Dick Olsen (439-5410) Thank you for your consideration Patriotically Yours, /d-e ( eeese--I-z. (:)..2.-1_....J 1---,--,-- Dick Huelsmann Dick Olsen Encl 5 items VETERANS MEMORIAL MAINTENANCE LIST (6/16/04) WE HAVE A BEAUTIFUL VETERANS MEMORIAL THAT MUST BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED FOR "OUR HEROES — THEN, NOW, & FOREVER" 1) CLEAN UP DEBRIS — PLACE IN TRASH CAN @ 3RD ST STAIRS (EVERY OTHER DAY) 2) CLEAN PLAGUES (WEEKLY) 3) CLEAN INTERIOR LETTERS (WEEKLY) 4) SWEEP WALKWAYS & PAVER AREAS (EVERY OTHER DAY) 5) CLEAN BENCHES (AS NEEDED) 6) PULL WEEDS FROM PLANTING AREAS (WEEKLY) (NOTE • MAINTENANCE OF FLOWERS- SPRINKLER SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY WATER FLOWERS BEDS EXCEPT @ NORTH CURVED FENCE LINE WHICH WILL REQUIRED HAND WATERING (EVERY OTHER DAY) • WATER TREES & SHRUBS AS REQUIRED SPRINKLER SYSTEM DOESN'T WATER TREES OR SHRUBS (AS REQUIRED) • REPLACEMENT&TRIMMING OF SHRUBS BY OTHERS 7) CLEAN LENSE OF FLOODLITES & FLOODLIGHTS (WEEKLY) 8) REPORT TO JOHN KRAEMER (439-4350) OF ANY ITEMS REQUIRING SPECIAL MAINTENANCE (1 e. FLAGS — FLOWERS — SHRUBS — PAVERS MAINTENANCE) 9) SNOWPLOWING (TBD) 10) GRASS CUTTING SW & NW OF "WALL OF HONOR" BY CHRIS LENTZ 11) OTHER ITEMS 11 1) DICK OLSEN WILL VERIFIY SPRINKLER SYSTEM TIMES W/BOB KANNEL 11 2) JOHN KRAEMER WILL REPLACE LITERATURE AS REQUIRED 12) CONTRACT TERMS 12 1) WAGES • PAY/HR $15 00 CHRIS LENTZ $10 00 FOR CHRIS LENTZ' BOYS • PAYMENT TO BE MADE (MONTHLY) BY VETERAN COMMITTEE • CHRIS WILL CALL IN TIME TO DICK OLSEN @ 439-5410 12 2) ALL SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT TO BE PURCHASED BY THE VETERANS COMMITTEE THIS MAINTENANCE LIST WILL BE MODIFIED AS REQUIRED VETERANS MEMORIAL CUB PARKING LISTED BELOW ARE OPEN PARKING STALLS DATE TIME UPPER LOT (81) LOWER LOT (54) 4`h ST LOT (19) WED 6/16 1 15 PM 24 0 19 DO THURS 6/17 11 00 AM 25 0 19 DO FRI 6/18 3 00 PM 34 31 17 DO (NOT TRUE TEST) WED 6/23 8 00 PM 32 24 19 DO FRI 6/25 8 05 PM 45 25 19 DO WED 6/23 1 30 PM 32 24 17 DO WED 6/23 7 45 AM 30 10 17 JK WED 6/23 11 35 AM 27 12 18 JK FRI 6/25 8 05 AM 41 25 19 DO FRI 6/25 8 45 AM 29 9 10 JU K MON 6/28 8 00 AM 41 12 19 JK THURS 7/1 1 30 PM 24 12 18 DO WED7/7 930AM 25 15 18 DO TUES 7/13 9 21 13 20 JK TUES 7/13 9 45 AM 13 ' 19 JU K WED7/14 945AM 19 9 19 JUK MON 8/2 2 45 PM 28 19 12 DO TUES 8/17 9 15 AM 20 19 19 DO MON 8/23 11 40 AM 12 15 19 DO MON 8/30 8 15 AM 17 16 19 DO NOTES HAVEN'T SEEN ANYONE PARKING IN HDCP PARKING IN UPPER OR LOWER LOTS Sf!PERVAL1:11NC_:! SUPER/MU Corporate Offices PO Box990 Minneapolis MN 55440 612 828 4000 9/3/04 Mr Dick Olsen St Croix Valley Community Foundation Veteran's Memorial PO Box 137 Stillwater, MN Fax 651-439-8555 Mr Olsen We approve the proposed expansion of the existing Veteran's Memorial located across the street from our Cub Foods Office in Stillwater based on the following 1 The expansion will be as shown on the Drawing from Larson Brenner Architects dated 8/22/03 2 4 Handicapped parking spaces will be eliminated which will be redrawn in a new location within the lot by Larson Brenner (Approximately 6 standard spaces will be lost) The parking lot will be restriped at no cost to SUPERVALU 3 One of the parking lot lights in the lower lot will be relocated to create a better view of the Memonal A lighting study assunng safe light levels will be performed pnor to relocation of light 4 The timing of the expansion is not determined at this time 5 All related costs will be the responsibility of others 6 If additional parking is lost due to expansion of the Memorial SUPERVALU may need additional street parking Discussions with the City will be required Please call me at 952-828-4263 if you have any questions Sincerely, (454,\ Neil Libson SUPERVALU, Director Office Facilities CC Dennis Arth, Gordy Farrington August 11 2004 Territorial Springs LLC 6 West 5th Street Suite 700 St Paul Minnesota 55102 Terra Three LLC 5605 West 36th Street Suite 202 Minneapolis Minnesota 55416 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Robert Engstrom Companies 4801 West 8161 Street Suite 101 Minneapolis Minnesota 55437 The Honorable Jay Kimble Stillwater City Hall 216 N Fourth Street Stillwater Minnesota 55082 Dear Territorial Springs LLC Robert Engstrom Companies Terra Three LLC and Mayor Kimble RE Territorial/State Prison, North Main Street, Stillwater, Washington County The property listed above was placed on the National Register of Historic Places on April 20 1982 Our records indicate that the property was destroyed by fire on September 3 2002 As part of our efforts to maintain the integrity of the state s National Register listings we are requesting the Keeper of the Register to de -list" those properties which have ceased to meet the criteria for listing in the National Register because the qualities which caused them to be originally listed have been lost or destroyed Federal regulations (36 CFR 60) require that we notify you the current owners of the property and the chief elected local officials before the de -listing is presented to the Keeper of the National Register You are invited to attend the State Review Board meeting on Tuesday October 19 2004 at which the removal will be considered (The Preservation Office staff will make an informational presentation on program activities at 7 00 p m ) The meeting will he called to order at 7.30 p.m The meeting will be held in the Cargill Commons of the MacMillan Education Wing of the Minnesota Historical Society History Center, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West St Paul MN 55102 If you wish to comment in writing on whether the property should be removed from the National Register please send your comments to Secretary State Review Board State Historic Preservation Office 345 Kellogg Blvd W St Paul MN 55102-1906 before the State Review Board considers this removal on Tuesday October 19 2004 If you have any questions regarding the de -listing procedures please contact Susan Roth National Register Historian at 345 Kellogg Blvd W St Paul MN 55102 susan.roth®mnhs.org or 651/215-0118 Sincerely Britta L Bloomberg Deputy State Historic Preservation er cc Mr Larry Hansen City Administrator/Finance Director Stillwater City Hall 216 N Fourth St Stillwater MN 55082 Mr Steve Russell Community Development Director Stillwater City Hall 216 N Fourth St Stillwater MN 55082 Washington County Board of Commissioners Washington County Government Center 14949 62nd St N PO Box 6 Stillwater MN 55082-0006 345 Kellogg Boulevard West/Saint Paul Minnesota 55102 1906/ Celephone 65L 296 6126 THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO Sue Fitzgerald, Planner FROM Cindy Shills, Building Official DATE August 12, 2004 SUBJECT 1824 N 1ST Street Garage Demolition As per the demolition ordinance I am required to perform a structural evaluation of any building over 50 years old that has been submitted to the Planning Department for demolition I visited the above mentioned address today and I have made the determination that the garage and house are both in disrepair The foundations and walls and roofs of both structures are bow, ed and sagging and appear structurally inadequate The garage roof basically consists of a blue tarp at this point After looking at both structures, it is my opinion that it may be cost prohibitive for the owner to invest in repairs, as the house would have to be basically rebuilt from the foundation and up The garage is beyond any type of repair and is near collapse CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 CURRENT PLANNING ISSUES,,,, L./0CJ building a Sense of Community /2-- Editors Note The following article is the third in a senes of short articles highlight- ing some of the hey planning issues facing planners today ow often do you hear people today lamenting a loss of a "sense of community" or the erosion of small town character ? Certainly these are concerns I frequently hear in my work with cities and towns across the country And just as surely the) reflect diverse and often hard to pin down thoughts For many years most local planning departments (and planning commis sions) have focused on planning issues which could be said to be related to the efficiency of communities managing traf fic, coordinating land use planning with public facility and utility planning and dealing with the tangible impacts of growth and development (such as storm water runoff) It is also true that much of what goes to create a sense of community occurs outside the realm of local govern ment planning in schools churches social networks, cultural institutions and family groups What then can planning commissions do to foster the elusive task of true com munity building? I would argue that there are many local planning related issues that we can recognize as contnbuung to community building In fact this is what lies at the heart of many recent trends in planning including the new urbanist and smart growth movements The following are some of the areas where planning commissions can have an impact on building a sense of community 1 Strong and Connected Communities In this day and age of mobility and lengthy commutes, the role of neighbor- hoods has tended to diminish in impor tance Compounding this has been the proliferation of isolated pods of subdivi- sions, loosely connected (at best) to each by C Gregor) Dale FAICP other and to surrounding areas Ho%% ever, a growing number of cities and towns are working to re%erse this by pro moung development patterns \N here resi dermal areas are not stind alone enclaves PI -inning for neighborhood parks and schools accessible b% foot is one way of promoting stronger more tightly knit communities 2 Town Centers A closely related mud can be seen in the increlsed interest in revitalizing his torte core areas and in designing and building town centers in newly suburban [zing lreas A stronb focal point for a community (whether functional or sym boltc) cm contribute ;reply to a sense of community In man% newly emerging suburban areas plus, ire being imple mented for mixed ust_ town centers that encompiss commerctll, residential insu tution-il and public uses 3 Pcdestnan Onentation Min) believe that the presence of the automobile as the dominant form of transportation has been a ke) factor in the erosion of a sense of community While %%a all can appreciate the conve nience comfort and pm acy of automo bile transportation cities and tovv ns are realizing that one of the best %%ays to strengthen a sense of community is by deN oting resources to encourage pedestn an activity 4 Improved Design Quahty Notwithstanding the desire for better pedestrian connections no one wants to walk around a community that does not feel welcoming As a result architects landscape architects and planners are focusing on improving the visual appear- ance of new development particularly as it relates to creating a pedestnan fnendly environment Simple mechanisms such as improved landscaping less obtrusive signage avoidance of overly large con centrations of parking and better site design can make for a more walkable environment 5 Open Space Preservation Parks trails nature preserves and other green space can provide another important way of increasing a sense of community This is especially so when the open space is tied together as an iden ttfiable community network While some open space can be preserved within new de%elopments a true community wide neu ork of open spaces often requires the outlay of financial resources to acquire land or development nghts 6 A Range of Housing Opportunities A final way to think about sense of community has to do with the range of housing options the community pro vides While each community must decide for itself what housing mix works best many believe that providing a range of housing options is a way to promote community quality How can housing affect a sense of place' Consider these questions Does your community have housing options to meet the needs of young married couples who grew up in the community and are Just starting out? Does your community ha% e housing options for those no longer able or interested in maintaining a single family home and yard? Many believe that providing for the ability to house young people who grew up in the community along with empty nesters who want to remain in the community is an important element of a true community • C Gregory Dale is a Principal with the plan ning and zoning firm of McBride Dale Clarion in Cincinnati Olio Dale was recently named a Fellow of the American Institute of Certified Planners He manages planning projects and also regularly conducts training for planning officials throughout the country PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 55 / SUMMER 2004 i SITE PLAN oOPLUSO, THIRD STREET LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS MMJS 1311601. A SWUM. 06361021114 SSLSHIu11 Rears k 0s1s 0avplbs ] 0s/WO. Paw ]qsf ] W/b/M *IA* bp* o.m Covenharc 8/22/0S ee.e M.A.T /D.l /A.S y 1:1101 Oat Vas gaakeOR v ryv1 ro *Aud4svvNr s] Wm sW�atl OW en Kama /1a9sa *a d bn Cur slate d 111sa4 Prod. ma VETERANS MEMORIAL STILLWATER MINNESOTA SITE PLAN - EXPANDED PAVERS Al l 1 1 1 1 1 I III 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING LIGHT FIXT LAWN li It r 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 '''I''''I1 1 1I' III 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I11III111111 1 1 III.1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ I 1 I, I I I I I I I I I 1 -_ VETERANS MEMORIAL MEMORIAL SIGNAGE & FLAGPOLE STUDY - FLAGPOLES ATTACHED TO INNER WALL PLAN AT MEMORIAL AND RETAINING WALL SCALE 1/8 = 1 0 LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS 09/02/04 I004a� 1/IX> IIIXX:XY\ EXXRA VOA CXXCI\\. PIXTMFat IYYVW/VVVNiIYII MEMORIAL DONOR PLAQUE BEYOND EXISTING LIGHT FIXT LOWER PARKING LOT VETERANS MEMORIAL MEMORIAL SIGNAGE & FLAGPOLE STUDY - 15'-0" POLES SECTION THROUGH MEMORIAL & RETAINING WALL - LOOKING WEST SCALE 1/8 = 1 0 LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS 09/02/04 1111 ROTAS II�I��I��fG� WAR MOM yffell rk 11121 iko) VETERANS MEMORIAL MEMORIAL SIGNAGE & FLAGPOLE STUDY - 15" LEI 1hRS - 15'-0" POLES NORTH RETAINING WALL ELEVATION SCALE 1/8 = 1 -0" T ARCCIN PRFNNFR AR CT-ITTFCTR (1R/1 Q/(l4 A\�1MM 1< z J - L = _ IL __J =- 1L =1I - _ C _ = I FIEtfil T iA - c _ II _ li_ fi_ if t _ II 1 VETERANS MEMORIAL MEMORIAL SIGNAGE & FLAGPOLE STUDY - 15" LETTERS - 20'-0" POLES NORTH RETAINING WALL ELEVATION SCALE 1/8n =1' 0" LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS 09/02/04 2'-Qu 1 1111111 I 11 11 111 LJ L__1 L J L__J L__J FRONT SIDE VETERANS MEMORIAL DONOR PLAQUE STUDY - VERTICAL PLAQUE PLAQUE MATERIALS TO BE DETERMINED SCALE 3/4" = 1' - 0" LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS 09/02/04 2'-1 " IIIIII11111 I i 11 1 I 11 11111 SIN J J LJ L__J L__J L__J FRONT SIDE VETERANS MEMORIAL DONOR PLAQUE STUDY - SLOPED PLAQUE PLAQUE MATERIALS TO BE DETERMINED SCALE 3/4" = l' - 0" LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS 09/02/04 PARTIAL PLAN L__J ELEVATION VETERANS MEMORIAL LITERATURE BOX STUDY BOX MATERIAL TO BE DETERMINED SCALE 3/4" = l' - 0" LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS 09/02/04 Teddy Bear Prk Stillwater, Mn - 19pipp pily Tube talker Caboose climb Train tracks (brown and black surfacing) Grass d (green surfacing) Ladder roug --------------_ r Slide Slide Ladder Riverboat slide f Overhead rmg climb Bubble panel PIy Area #2 Ages 3-5 yrs old Train Station Sand box i �.;;.-:. Crawl throug Spring rider v Train Engine slide Sand ` Gear pa el Bell Whistle Tube talker River (blue surfacing) 1' I. � r 1 Play Area #2 Play components r y�v-y i,.i i f 1t Z) '�'x�'". `ti`+nl „ice h'1` r1��. +� c`R77ic-`.tom' 7.1 Netting & platforms River (blue surfacing) Lift Bridge lookout ?' Tube talker - interactive panel Crawl through Tectdy Bear Prk Stillwater, Mn Spyroslic1e Lift bridge L44er Grass (green surfacing) Play Area #3 Ages 5-12 yrs old Tree house tower Bubble panel /Lo9tube slue �C Play Area #3 Play components '!�A2 i',f ,J+rr„. a r ra `'} sL j. cs-a,i ,y?i LtAr ,r t-#S�'.4t ro,tS.t'�.r `4: �". t'i - . ...: ,s,,r-I,,,,....;.,,;..,r,..j,> ,:-:.10e 'dr7 ltf 'y 41y +f 4_�ts T �T' kr ./ _ {c_ t1rl�'1 �, - `�1�` �t4.i.''fv'% -rs -401Z6 , . i<-rr` „,/'a r—.) N-�7rr �r+G" 41j�- �`ti a >� ZL sro • �d �3 — a. >n «'.� �'-..,a \tisJ': :.".� Limestone climber Tedcty Bear Park Stillwater, Mn ( Bluff Play Area #4 Ages 5-12 yrs old "elN. / 4 / 4 // 4 /� 1 4 % \ / / \ / / \C / N. �/ _, \ c c c c c t Lincoln log structure Circus ball crawl out Building block climber Mirror panel \_ C ( (x 0 Tic Tac Toe Tectcty Bear Park Stillwater, Mn Interactive levers Drum Grass (green surfacing) Play Area #1 Ages 0-3 yrs old Trolley platform v ci Train tracks (brown and black surfacing) River (blue surfacing) Play Area #1 Play components • j 4w l+S'+C ~ .-ram" __ le.....- „,.. - w :mac a ' -n� . -Z • >-a nt , �r e�ivf .. °' r w I ►. %1� t , Tube talker Caboose climb Train tracks (brown and black surfacing) Falls Grass (green surfacing) II Tecldy Bear Prk Stillwater, Mn Ladder Slide M Slide Ladder Riverboat slide A Digger -Overi-iead rtng climb Bubble panel Step stones PIy Area #2 Ages 3-5 yrs olct Train Engine slide Crawl ou Tram Station Sandbox Sand Spring rider Crawl through Gear pa eI Bell Whistle Tube talker River (blue surfacing)