Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-09 CPC Packet• PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, January 9, 1995, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of December 12, 1994 AGENDA 1 Case No ZAM/94-64 A zoning ordinance map amendment to rezone a 7 5 acre parcel of property from RA, Single Family Residential to RB, Two Family Residential The property is located east of County road 5 and Croixwood Blvd John E Roettger, applicant 2 Case No SUB/94-63 A major subdivision of a 7 5 acres parcel into 10-duplex lots ranging in size from 10,800 sq ft to 18,900 sq ft The property is located east of County Road 5 and Croixwood Blvd in the RA, Single Family Residential District John Roettger, applicant 3 Case No ZAT /95-7 A zoning ordinance text amendment revising the sign ordinance by reducing the allowed size and height of signs in business park districts City of Stillwater, applicant 4 Case No PUD/95-8 A planned unit development permit for office business use with parking located at corner the of South 3rd Street and Pine Street in the PA, Public Administrative Office District CUB Food and City of Stillwater, applicants 5 Case SUP/94-6 Review of landscape plan for Good Samaritan Center, at 1119 Owens Street North, Charles Huymk, applicant 6 Case No SUP/94-65 A special use permit to conduct an automotive repair business on Lot 3, Block 3, Outlot C of the Stillwater Market Place The property is located west of Market Drive between Orleans Avenue and Curve Crest Blvd in the BP-C Business Park -Office District Robert A Frey, applicant 7 Case No ZAM/95-4 A zoning ordinance map amendment rezoning the 10 47 acre CUB grocery store site at 2001 Washington Avenue from business park commercial, BP-C, to Business park industrial, BP -I, Andersen Windows, applicant 8 Case No SUP/DR/95-5 A special use permit and design review for a light industrial, office, warehouse facility at 2001 Washington Avenue in the Business park commercial BP-C District, Andersen Windows, applicant 9 Case No SUP/95-1 A special use permit to allow a home occupation beauty shop in a single family residence at 515 6th Street South in the Duplex residential R-B district William Wahlberg, applicant 10 Case No SUP/95- 6 A special Use Permit for a 3-guest room Bed and Breakfast in a single family residence at 704 1st Street South in the duplex residential RB district, John and Eloise Anton, applicants 11 Case No SUB/V/95-2 A preliminary plat approval and variances to the front yard setback requirements for a major subdivision of a 7 2 acre parcel of property into 36 lots with one outlot ranging in size from 5,386 sq ft to 66,625 sq ft for construction of twinhomes with zero lot line setbacks The property is located on the south east corner of Shelton Drive and Tuenge Drive in the RB, Two -Family Residential District Schafer Development, applicant 12 Case No SUP/DR/95-3 A special use permit with design review for an ice cream parlor/restaurant, located at 215 South Main Street in the Central Business District, CBC, Zone District, Todd Pelhzzer, applicant o F Ilk • • • PLANNING COMMISSION Dec 12, 1994 Present Jerry Fontaine, chairman Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott, Rob Hamlin, Kirk Roetman, and Don Valsvik Absent Dorothy Foster, Jay Kimble and Darwin Wald Others Steve Russell, community development director, Ann Terwedo, planning Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m Mayor Hooley appeared before the Commission and thanked members for their support and for the gift Case No. SUP/94-64. A special use permit to conduct an office use out of a residential structure at 102 S Sherburne in the RB, Two Family Residential District Ted Harms, applicant Mr Harms appeared on his own behalf He said he owns a company which produces educational materials and wants to relocate from the west coast to an office here He said the business does not have any customer traffic and would not create any traffic congestion He said he understood the area was zoned residential, but said he thought the business would be a credit to the neighborhood Ted Gillen, 1011 W Myrtle St , said he thought operating an office out of a residence would be OK only if there were no other commercial places available He said he would prefer the house to remain residential and said an office use would not do any good to the neighboring properties Herb Kaplan, 106 S Sherburne, said a house/office would be acceptable, but said he and his wife would object if the existing residence were to be used only for commercial/office use Mr Harms said the house would not be changed in any way There would be no sign, he said, and no on -street parking The most traffic the business would generate would be UPS deliveries, he said He had the opportunity to purchase the house and it looked like it could have met his needs He also said he would be happy to supply neighbors with character references Mr Hamlin said he supports cottage -type industry But he ;aid this proposal sounds like it should be located in an area zoned for business and said he did not see any hardship in finding another location for the business Mr Roetman agreed that the proposal was not consistent with the neighborhood He also suggested that granting a special use permit and not rezoning would be doing an injustice to other businesses paying commercial property taxes Duane Elliott, seconded by Don Valsvik, moved to deny the request, all in favor Mr Fontaine reminded Mr Harms that he did have the option of appealing the denial within 10 days Case No SUP/94-65 The case was continued Case No V/94-66 A variance to the front yard setback requirement (30 feet required, 4 5 feet requested) for a porch and second floor addition at 1656 S Greeley St in the RA, Single Family Residential District Richard Ritzer, applicant Mr Ritzer appeared on his own behalf He said there was some misunderstanding regarding the setback requirements He said he was told it was 20 feet, not 30, and he was requesting 6 6 feet, rather than 4 There was discussion about the zoning in_ the area and variance previously issued to the Ritzers for construction of a large garage/storage building The garage was connected to the residence, which was not part of the variance initially approved Staff had recommended denial of the request Mr Russell referred to the issue of fire protection in having the buildings connected and said there was a way of accomplishing the requested addition by keeping the buildings separate Mr Hamlin moved approval with the condition that a fire barrier, approved by the fire department, be installed Mr Valsvik suggested adding the condition that the existing structures be brought up to code Mr Hamlin accepted the amendment to his motion, Mr Valsvik seconded the motion Vote was 5-1, with Mr Elliott voting no Mr Elliott expressed his frustration with trying to correct something that wasn't done properly after the original variance was granted Mr Valsvik agreed that there should be some follow-up when variances are granted to • • • make sure the conditions of approval are followed, he wondered if that was the Planning Commission's or city staff's responsibility Mr Valsvik suggested that Mr Russell prepare some possible recommendations regarding follow-up on variances/conditions of approval for consideration at the next meeting Case No SUP/V/94-67 A special use permit to conduct a take-out business at 210 N Main St in the CBD, Central Business District, with a variance to the sign ordinance for construction of a 6-foot tall free- standing sign, three feet from the front property line (15 feet required) Mohanmmand-Ali-Salehi-Mischei, applicant Don Broman appeared representing the applicant Gary Bressler, project architect, also was present Ann Terwedo told the commission one issue that wasn't resolved in the Heritage Preservation Commission review was that of the sign material Mr Broman said the applicant would like to take the traditional Domino's sign and encase it in wood Jay Michels, a member of the Heritage Preservation Commission, said that group would prefer to have a wood sign, but the issue was left up in the air, depending on what Domino's would or would not allow regarding signage Mr Michels, who lives at 118 1/2 N Main St , later expressed his concern regarding curb cuts and planned parking He said curb cuts as planned would not large enough for parking and drive -through traffic He suggested that traffic flow might be directed to Commercial/Second Street Mr Broman said the developers think the traffic flow should come off Main Street He also said MnDOT had been contacted regarding curb cuts and a 30 foot curb cut is preferred But he said it is an issue the applicant would be willing to take a look at Mr Roetman noted that traffic coming off Main would be the same situation as currently exists with the Fina station Mr Fontaine said he would be reluctant to approve the request if using a plastic sign in a wooden frame was not acceptable to the Heritage Preservation Commission Roger Tomten, an HPC member, said according to the Downtown design guidelines, the sign should be of metal or wood Mr Tomten also noted that corporations are beginning to recognize the value of historic districts in allowing exceptions to corporate policies, such as signage standards Mr Valsvik made a motion to add a condition that there be right hand traffic only off Main, exiting on Commercial, Mr Roetman seconded the motion Mr Elliott suggested that traffic engineers review the situation instead of the Planning Commission determining the traffic flow issue The original motion was amended to have traffic engineers review the situation Staff condition of approval No 8 was amended to require that the final sign/lighting plan go back to the Heritage Preservation Commission for its review and that staff review the external lighting plan Mr Elliott, seconded by Mr Roetman, moved approval with the amended/added conditions All in favor Comp plan update Hans Hagen gave a presentation regarding development plans for the Staloch farm Large -lot single-family homes are proposed adjacent to Long Lake, small -lot, single-family homes would be located west off the main road All existing trees would be saved, and the northeast portion of the area would be left as open space There are about 76 acres in the proposed development, 10 acres of park Seventy-nine large -lot homes are proposed, with 85 small -lot homes, resulting in a density of about 2 2 units per acre Mr Hagen also gave a brief presentation about a commercial area like Season's Market which could be located somewhere in the URTPA He said it it possible to have a shopping center in a residential development with the proper design, he is not proposing one on his site Marc Putnam, representing the Charles Cudd Co , gave a presentation regarding a proposal for the Kroening property, 180 acres north of the Staloch property The design proposal includes a large village green connected with a number of smaller greens A school/commercial alternative is built into the plan The proposed lot sizes may change depending on the market, he said The current proposal has about 220 homes on the 180 acres, he said A member of the audience asked why a one unit per 2 1/2 acre density 0 0 • • • wouldn't work Mr Russell asked whether the concept of cluster housing had been considered Mr Putnam said it won't work because it is inefficient and the cost will drive producers elsewhere Mr Hagen agreed that competition drives what developers can do Larry Frank appeared representing Arcon Land Development Co Arcon does not build homes, it develops lots with utilities/street and generally markets the lots to individual builders Arcon is proposing to develop 131 acres of the Abramowitz property, between the Zephyr railroad tracks and Boutwell Road A variety of housing is planned -- 133 single-family homes, 87 small single-family lots and 29 townhouse units There would be 42 acres of open space/wetlands, with one main entrance off Boutwell Miles Lindberg outlined possible development plans for the Palmer property, 173 acres located at Manning Avenue and Highway 96 The proposal calls for the same three housing types as the Arcon proposal, with 282 units on the 173 acres -- 2 1 units per acre There is a 6 5 acre site for possible commercial development at the Manning/96 intersection Other business The Ward Network has asked for a written response to their report/presentation Members were asked to get any comments to Mr Russell for inclusion in the Commission's response There also was a brief discussion regarding a letter members had received from Ward Network representatives Mr Hamlin, seconded by Mr Valsvik, moved to set a public hearing on the sign ordinance and design guidelines for the West Industrial Park All in favor Glenna Bealka, seconded by Duane Elliott, moved approval of the minutes of the special meeting of Nov 30, 1994 Mr Hamlin agreed to reappointment to another term on the Planning Commission Mr Wald will be contacted regarding his interest in reappointment Don Valsvik, seconded by Duane Elliott, moved to adjourn the meeting at 1050 pm Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No ZAM/94-64 Planning Commission Date November 14, 1994 Project Location County Road 5 and Croixwood Boulevard Zoning Distract R-A Single Family Applicant's Name John Roettger Type of Application Zoning Map Amendment Project Description The request is to rezone 7 25 acres of land from Single Family Residential R-A to Duplex Residential R-B The site is located on the east side of County Road 5 across from the intersection with Croixwood Boulevard (see attached location map) Discussion The proposal is to rezone the 7 25 acre property from R-A Single Family Residential to R-B Duplex Residential The R-A zoning requires 10,000 square feet per dwelling unit, while the R-B zoning requires 5,000 square feet per dwelling unit The zoning in the area is Single Family, Multi -Family Residential (across County Road 5) and General Commercial (Brooks/Kindercare) (see attached zoning map) Although zoned R-A, the Cottages are built at a multi -family density The area to be rezoned is comprised of two lots One lot currently contains a single family residence That lot contains 1 60 acres A second parcel contains a total land area of 6 68 acres Of that land area, 3 68 acres of land is developable outside of the wetlands area A related proposal (case SUB/94-63) subdivides the two lots into 10 additional lots which could contain 20 dwelling units The proposed Duplex Residential zoning in consistent with the residential use to the south and west of the site and its location next to County Road 5 Recommendation Approx al Attachments Application and Map PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE Ft, ,M rOCOVedi (r3/3 191-/ T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment IV Zoning Amendment Other Engineering Review Fee Total Fee Case No Date Fee Paid FEE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection •►th any application `� q�� Address of Project Assessor s Parcel No 0 96 3 Z - 3 C' a o q. 3 Zoning District Description of Project Gam s Au c-rib.J e r /O - -%•N /f�n�s I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner Mailing Address A7 Z ICU fox .( Si /kALes j /L1n1 .S"LH79 Telephone No lit r" L� h �L,o rZ I 2 / 09'L • x Signature 6.L /4-77 i-e._ N 6� Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten Sc6 /477-A(--Ne,) Lot Size (dimensions) x sq ft Total Land Area 7 2.7 A4_, Hight of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory { - / Z 3 G-A y // E. Representative J G N-�. F Gil 6 F Go rev > Mailing Address y 3 9 Co s,-LRe l7( %R AIL u Si/wA1 �H,�bL oez 5; /Lk)*r„L /1,. �0OrG2- �3 G/z Or? "9z' Telephone No 4/ 3 9 - / Date of Public Hearing, is gnature calendar days othe date of the action Total Floor Area :5G'L ' Li sq ft Proposed floor area 20 u ni i_ sq ft 1 �`7((C 5 F Building Coverage L u 0 sq ft V z Paved Impervious Area if z7i_GOsq ft Number of off street parking spaces 1/0 /%Zc s' /3z46 • LOCATION MAP ,, ZAM/94-64 CR#5 St!Ilpar • • s ______Imemmi 0 300 600 ittai BAPTIST CHURCH • 09032-3200 V707B Mg7ooS i a eo CONDO /K NO 61 COND D4 2900 09032-3005 09032 - 3010 7v7 09032- 3015 01 e 9 2 s OUTLOT C 27/12 T9 T I e % HY•y, ee 1Sa S3 S 3 CE 032— 3025 S89°; • 29 ti Aefr OUTLO D L/Lr L4R£ f[EMFVTARr scHnoi. 3 M 0 09032-2445 o - N Zrr� • `1 My( 2460 30 2800 N 88°56130"E 400 00 ` -. 7 6s"J At/ W 1— 7 NO " ■ 9 CJ PROICI ST IC Co, YM.497 Mn o.IC Y AI.AGCYC / MICA PO' 7£ /M/ } i NO 36 CROIXI000 c lo. s LL• o �\ PARK f 2 STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO 36 ER_AO.EN .Rlv 14 I ' lLA PUBIC WORKS STORAGE AREA • fit T 1 1 1 I Li_ I i.L W R A 3 ► PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No PUD/SUB/94 63 Planning Commission Date November 14 1994 roject Location County Road 5 and Croixwood Boulevard Zoning District R A Single Family Residential Applicant s Name John Roettger Type of Application Concept PUD/Subdivision Plan/Plat 10 lot Project Description The application is to subdivide 2 lots containing 7 25 acres into 10 lots (A rezoning request to rezone the property from Single Family R A to Duplex Residential R B is being reviewed separately by the Planning Commission ) Discussion The site is located east of County Road 5 A pond (wetland) is located next to County Road 5 on the site The site then slopes up toward the east The site is covered with a variety of trees from Cottonwood to Oak trees The tree locations wetland and topography of the site are shown on the site survey The subdivision proposal shows 10 lots ranging in size from 18 900 square feet to 10 800 square feet Ten thousand square feet is the minimum lot size requirement The plan shows a 32 foot wide road accessway to the site from the north end off of County Road 5 Comments from Washington County regarding road access are attached Since the last review by the commission on November 14 1994 the developer has combined driveways and reduced the width of curb cuts and relocated the access road out of the wetland The public works department requests that the maximum driveway width for a combined driveway be 25 feet It is recommended that the roadway width for the portion of road from County Rd 5 to the first driveway be reduced from 32 feet to 24 •feet to allow further setback from the wetland It is also recommended that the two units on the lot furthest north on the site be illuminated or redesigned and combined with the second lot possibly in a triplex configuration The proposed structure on the entry lot does not meet front or rear yard setback requirements and is located awkwardly on the site as would be viewed from County Rd 5 The first lot or a part of it may provide for the city park dedication requirements Other project plan comments received from the Soil and Water Conservation District is that the detention pond should have an outlet at its south end The project requires a variance from the 50 foot roadway setback requirement from the wetland The plans show a sidewalk leading from County Road 5 to Lily Lake School property The sidewalk and retaining walls should be constructed when the public improvements are installed The project design has attempted to deal with the wetland sloped condition of the lot and access limitations to County Road 5 The project is consistent with the new Duplex Residential zoning of the site Conditions of Approval 1 A sidewalk and retaining wall as shown on the plans shall be installed when public improvements are constructed 2 The first lot to the north of the site shall be illuminated or redesigned with the adjacent lot Subject to staff and council approval 3 Park dedication requirements shall be 7 percent of net developable land or as required by the Park and Rec Commission 4 The cul de sac street shall be 24 feet wide from the entry off of County Road 5 to the first driveway 5 All comments from Washington County Public Works shall be met • 6 The pond shall have an outlet on its south end 7 A landscape plan shall be submitted showing one replacement tree for every two 6 or greater in diameter that are removed Preferred replacement trees shall be oak PLhANING ADMINISTRATIVE F...tM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment l/ Other /7 i, t2,t(4,( 1 ( d Engineering Review Fee Total Fee Case No Date Fee Paid FEE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted m connection .ith any application /c Address of Project J" �' Z Zoning District �= 2 Description of Project fL/4 r /"`A -Ai Assessor s Parcel No G yG 52 - 3 - LG ' C Ai c- o OF /G _ /tJ,N //oM •s I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner / i r/ � z-/ a- OI Y Mailing Address AT 2 P66,4 / sa �4�f79 Telephone No S7 Glta.y /�o�v r Representative \)U /> nl o E7TG & Cu AD yrT2 MailmgAddress 937t S.—c.2u/xp 1AJ ST/ccw �i/h/' S��r� S% /LL4J.4 T bZ /L/is 550�:Z 2 - y /3 L, (v/Z 4/3y 6 yZO Telephone No 4}39- /Z} %S Signature G E77. ATTkt_.N E , X Signature Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days o the date of the action Si 5 A%TA-C-f+CD Lot Size (dimensions) x sq ft Total Land Area 9 2. S ,-c,z 5 5 Hight of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Date of Public Hearing is Total Floor Area ��c o tr0 sq ft Proposed floor area z-c- uN r s sq ft Building Coverage 366-4/0 sq ft Paved Impervious Area 1/1/266 sq ft Number of off street parking spaces 1-}-6 J5 APPEALS BUILDING MOVING PERMITS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN DESIGN PERMIT i— GRADING PERMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON -SITE SEWER PERMIT I 1 1 SITE ALTERATION PERMIT 1 I l ' VARIANCE (-7 VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT rx' ZONING AMENDMENT I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT I OTHER Record of Action on Application Decision Authority Date of Action Decision by Authority Appeals Period (date) Appeal Filed (date) Appeal Scheduled (date) Appeal Decision Authority Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date Decision Complete (date) • s F 2 /6,6. Zq s,-- 3 /Zz>)>G5;- f l s /347 5r 7 /2i s)= /6 s/ ? 6sF • /1,) 1-z.,' .S!9; cJ sft-h /U�4J J •����`/Y /, G/6ySc-17 - \h XZ'C 6vAj � ; 5 z cyL3 j�GG'sr (�/�1L / 1- a,) /l2-5.4 - • (a) 0 S ci F,z 0 PA-0E-42 /1 EA /z s:- 3 /Z '6 /Z",C`t 5� / 3 I/ 7 -5F /,3 3 cs%- 3Csf /a /6 4 E- s,vFtej<E1-It- ) 9206 c/ 6 oa 7Lr / / G��7GAri��SG/��� k)n'„nJ v� 26( 5 ZG iS 2 3 0 ��TkL j?AOFDA 1 3/9 71 s° COT 1 11 W '(v \, / )mow 0 \ v I1 / \\, `i gig I 11 r 1 19 �n5 wc' saH"' i Sjv G,,w° ijW / 1F1.0- P1-V)? Iry S L A G E 1 /211' I00'3 CURD V/ 1IOW I7'orir PA,o,JECr 17 k1-Gg sr 125" LoT 11 (93U5F /2.6° L br /0 0Uo Gor4 /2G4'0sf h,Rc.P QiseI Z ?/g /000 N `t&lb 4IALL qs° L0T 5 /34P7ss� / Lar 6, 133665E tie I (DO 9J24 7,, 80 d /s 0 14) 9qo 20v / 2,5‘ 0 y z 4 i • • MEMORANDUM f0 Ste Russell Community Dexelopment Director FROM Klayton Eckles, City Engineer SUBJFCT Reviev. of Subdivision SUB/94-63 Located on County Road 5/Croixwood Blvd DATF November 9 1994 1 hive reviewed the l O-lot subdivision and offer the following comments I o fully ex aluate the project additional information should be submitted by the applicant 1'he plan shows a lot of hard surface that will result in runoff that will impact the pond Need more information to evaluate the effect of piping Lily Lake School drainage to pond as well as de, elopment runoff • The road could be moved further away from the wetland at the north end to save trees and buffer wetlands This Mould result in loss of one lot • Should use standard 42 5 foot cul de sac (this would result in probable loss of one lot at south end) • A runoff settling basin should be provided to catch sediment before it enters the pond • A 24 toot roadway surface may be appropnate • The sidewalk from 1 ily Lake School and school drainage improvements should be coordinated with the school district • Width of driveways may be able to be reduced to reduce hard surface and runoff impact In conclusion a stormy, ater drainage plan and revision to the road design should be considered further before preliminary subdivision approval WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PARKS • HIGHWAYS • FACILITIES 11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH • STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 9573 612 430 4300 Facsimile Machine 612 430 4350 November 8 1994 Mr Steve Russell City of Stillwater 216 N Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Donald C Wisniewsk' P E Director Public Works/County Engineer John P Perkovich Deputy Director Operations Division Donald J Theisen P E Deputy Director Technical & Administrative Division James D Hanson P E Transportation Engineer Edward Kepler Facilities Operations Manager John Roettger Subdivision Adjacent to Washington County State Aid Highway 5 (Stillwater Case No SUB/94-63) Dear Mr Russell We have reviewed the revised John Roettger subdivision and find it to be acceptable if the following conditions are met 1 A Washington County Access Permit must be obtained for the connection to CSAH 5 (Stillwater Blvd North) 2 A Washington County Utility Permit must be obtained for all work within County right of way 3 Road plans, including cross sections, must be submitted to the County for approval 4 The connection of the access to CSAH 5 must be at a 90 degree angle 5 The developer must construct a right turn lane to serve the development This must De constructed according to the specifications of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and as follows The turn lane shall be 150 feet long by 14 feet wide with a 15 1 taper at the south end The length of the turn lane may be adjusted by the County based on the internal street design and traffic factors It shall be constructed with a 6 thick Class 5 aggregate base a 2 Type 31 Bituminous base course, a 2 thick Type 31 Bituminous binder course, and a 2 thick Type 41 Bituminous wearing course Where necessary, the existing curb and gutter must be removed and new B-624 curb and gutter installed to match the existing curb 6 In conjunction with turn lane construction, the developer must modify the storm sewer system to accommodate the width added to the roadway by the turn lane and the stormwater added to the system by this development Any changes to the wetland must be approved by the City of Stillwater Computations showing the Pn fed o Recycled P p EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Page two Letter to Steve Russell November 8, 1994 runoff volumes must be submitted to Washington County and the Stillwater City Engineer for approval prior to permit approval 7 All modifications to CSAH 5 must be completed prior to final paving of S A P 82-605 10, the current construction project on CSAH 5 This work is scheduled for late May, 1995 Washington County can construct the turn lane and storm sewer revisions as a supplement to the contract for S A P 82-605 10, if it is acceptable to the contractor on the job All costs associated with this work will be paid by the developer Please advise us as soon as the City acts on this subdivision since it is essential to coordinate turn lane construction with our construction project If you have questions or comments, please call me at 430 4312 Sincerely, Joseph Lux cc John Roettger Glenn Schreiner, SEH Klayton Eckles, Stillwater City Engineer Wally Abrahamson, Washington County Commissioner Don Theisen, Washington County Public Works Don Wisniewski, Washington County Public Works \lux\roettger Itr 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM • TO Planning Commission FR Steve Russell, Community Development Department DA January 4, 1995 RE AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE FOR BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT N In November, the planning commission directed staff to review the sign ordinance for the business park district due to the recent development of the Market Place project and concern for signage along County Road 5 At the planning commission meeting of December 12, 1994, a draft sign ordinance with changes was presented to the commission for comments The commission directed that no signage be allowed from backs of buildings along County Road 5 Specific design guidelines for the Market Place Planned Unit Development allow one sign per market place business (most likely located on the front of the building) and the revised sign regulations (Section 12) limit signage on County Road 5 These changes to the sign regulations will reduce new signage and bnng it into character with signage allowed in the Market Place project and the business park generally Recommendation Recommend for approval to city council Attachment Draft ordinance • • • • 9 PERMI IED SIGNS DY A SIGN PERMIT IN BUSINESS PARK DISTRICTS All commercial, office and industrial signs in all Business Park (BP) Districts are subject to the following requirements One (1) wall, freestanding, awning or canopy sign per business tak'ee is permitted subject to the following requirements a Wall Signs 1 Area The gross surface area of a wall sign shall not exceed one (1) square foot for each of building, parallel, or substantially parallel, to the front lot hne 2 Location A wall sign shall be located on the outermost wall of any principal building but shall not project more than sixteen (16) inches from the wall to which the sign is to be affixed The location and arrangement of all wall signs shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director 3 Height A wall sign shall not project higher than the parapet hne of the wall to which the sign is to be affixed or fifteen (1 feet as measured from the base of the building wall to which the sign is affixed, whichever is lower 4 Special Conditions Where a principal building is devoted to two (2) or more uses, the operator of each such use may install a wall sign upon his/her proportionate share of the building wall to which the sign is to be affixed A sign plan must be submitted for the entire building containing the following information a The total gross signage for the entire building shall not exceed one (1) square foot for each teat of such building face parallel, or substantially parallel, to a street lot line or a minimum of twenty-five (25) square feet per business b The location, sizes, types, Color and elevation drawings of all signs c All signs shall be visually consistent in location, proporation and scale b Freestanding Signs 1 Area The gross surface area of afreellitianding sign shall not exceed 3t2 square feet for each exposed face 2 Location A ground signShiblil be set back Et tin INNER from front or side property line 3 Height A ground sign shall not project higher than six (6) feet, as measured from base of sign or grade of the nearest adjacent roadway, whichever is lower 4 One freestanding sign per development site shall be allowed. c Awning, Canopy 1 Area The gross surface area of an awning, canopy or marquee sign shall not exceed thirty (3O) percent of the gross surface area of the awning, canopy or marquee to which such sign is to be affixed 2 Location A sign may be affixed to or located upon any awning, canopy or marquee 3 Height An awning, canopy or marquee sign shall not project higher than the top of the awning, canopy or marquee to which such sign is to be affixed d Multi -tenant Master Sign Program A building Master Sign Program shall be required (for multi -tenant commercial buildings) besides the individual tenant and occupant signs A building master identification sign may be permitted according to the following requirements 1 Building master identification signs shall not contain the names of any tenants or occupants of the center only the cenbagr name 2 If the multi -tenant commercial building has a floor area of 40,000 square feet or less, the building may have a freestanding sign with a maximum slarea of 40 square feet on each side and s maximum with a maximum height of eight feet 3 If the multiple tenant commercial building has a floor area greater than 40,000 square feet, but less than the 100,000 square feet, the Wilding may have a master identification sign with a • • • a • maximum of square feet on each side and a maximum height of CI NMI. 4 If the multiple tenant commercial building has a floor area of greater than 100,000 square feet, the center may have a master identification sign with a maximum area on 120 square feet on each side and a maximum height of 113 #mot 5 No individual shop or business within a multiple tenant commercial building shall have a freestanding sign 10 DIRECTORY SIGNS Directory signs are used to guide pedestrians to individual business within a multiple tenant commercial area and are permitted in Business Park (BP) Districts subject to design review 1 Placement - a must be placed on the site of the development b shall be erected only in internal pedestnan access areas and not in vehicle access areas c directory sign area to be used for the purposes of direction and identification only 2 Area - A directory sign may have maximum area on one square foot for each business listed on the sign and four square feet for the name of the building or complex 3 Directory signs may be freestanding but shall not exceed six and one-half feet in height 11 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION SIGNS Automobile service stations are allowed one (1) wall sign and one (1) ground sign subject to the following conditions a Wall Signs There shall be no more than one (1) wall sign with a maximum sign area of one (1) square foot for each two lineal feet of building frontage b Freestanding Signs There shall be no more than one (1) freestanding sign for each principal building A freestanding sign shall be set back ft f itS) from the front and side property line A freestanding sign shall not project higher than eight 6) feet as measured from grade or nearest curb height whichever is less or contain more than G® square feet °feign oroa c Service Bay and Island Identification Signs Service bay and island identification signs are permitted providing direction or instruction to persons using the facility but containing no advertising material of any kind 12 SPECIAL SIGN HEIGHT SEM AND LCOATIONi LIMITS a Because of the character of the area, including existing and proposed land use special sign regUietiOVIS for freestanding signs are required for certain streets as follows a Washington Avenue Crow' Tower to Orleans t* Cures Crest Boulevard from South Greeley to County Road 5 end Orleans from Cures Crest Blvd. to County Road 43 - Six (43) feet and 30 square toot b County Road 5 from Highway 36 to Croixwood Boulevard and South Greeley from Orleans to Highway 36 - eight (6) feet in height and 60 square feet in area (no sigage on rear of building toward County Road 5). H$ighy 343 Frontage Road from Oreeley to Curve Crest Blvd. - 25 feet and SO square feet. 13 NONCONFORMING USES a Nonconforming signs that are lawful on the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall have rights outlined in Chapter 31 01, Subd 9 of the Zoning Ordinance with respect to their alteration, extension, restoration and abandonment b Any person violating or failing to comply with any provision of this ordinance shall upon conviction thereof be guilty of a misdemeanor 14 VIOLATIONS • • • • • • In all cases of violations of this ordinance which are unabated thirty (30) days after written notice to record owner of the property on which the sign is located, the City may proceed to abate and remove the violation and, if deemed necessary, to have cost thereof specially assessed against the lot or parcel where the violation was located • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No PUD/98 Planning Commission Date January 9 199� Project Location 421 South Third Street/I06 East Pine Street Zoning District Professional Admm District Applicant s Name City of Stillwater/CUB Foods Type of Application Planned Unit Development Project Description Planned unit development for 63 000 sq ft office building with 52 space parking lot and a 161 space public parking lot Discussion The application is for a planned unit development application for a combined office building and city parking lot The purpose of this permit is to review the parking requirements and provisions for the office use The office use contains 63 254 square feet of floor area Fifty two (52) on site parking spaces are provided Based on the zoning parking requirements 210 spaces are required The public parking lot located across Third Street and a part of this application provides 161 parking spaces Total available off street parking on the two sites is 213 spaces The combined CUB/City site contains approximately 4 5 acres A 63 254 sq ft office building and 161 space parking lot currently occupy the site This PUD proposal would in no way change the use but condition the availability of the public parking lot for office use during normal working hours At other times nights weekends and holidays the public lot would be used by the non office public By combining the parking lot use and the office building use parking availability can be conditioned to the office use providing some security to the office user that the parking will be available The Riverview Lot is a public lot and available at all times to the public This review does not make the lot exclusively available to the office users but available generally to parkers in the area which is primarily the office use The office/parking use is consistent with the professional administrative zoning and the design of both the office building and parking lot have previously been approved by the city Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 The public parking lot use (Riverview Lot) shall be available for public use as long as the adjacent 63 000 sq ft office building is in use Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment Other Engineering Review Fee Total Fee Case No Date / Z Fee Paid r3 FEE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection (With any application Address of Project ,f2.1 `j /iurvi /EP/tile, 5r-- Assessor's Parcel No /UL— yy6, y Z.oc Zoning District p j. Description of Project �� e be-i ,f)4i .<M5 (of I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner Mailing Address tt) Oc,�rc,vt. 6 Ai i /- 5�.1�(4 ,71 . _- eif;fmac,i7 / { /I's 5, Mailing Address Telephone No ' 39 4 ft., Telephone No 7 7 —Z Signature Signature Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action Lot Size (dimensions) Total Land Area Hight of Buildings Stories Principal Accessory • Date of Public Hearing is x sq ft Total Floor Area sq ft ' Proposed floor area (32 S ( sq ft Feet p 1 y ,1 , Building Coverage _ _ sq ft I Paved Impervious Area sq ft /YI iT /r►' t (64 Number of off street parking spaces Li 2{E) — (cc>) -5" 14-43 \-Cj v— pak,)4,i y ( 1-- / — y ,'i 5- C.f.-7C- z- -7-yam • • APPEALS BUILDING MOVING PERMITS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE —I CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT E —, GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN I DESIGN PERMIT nGRADING PERMIT 1 i PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON SITE SEWER PERMIT r--I SITE ALTERATION PERMIT 1 n VARIANCE VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT I ZONING AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT OTHER Record of Action on Application Decision Authortr Date of Action 7 - 7- Cj v Decision by Authority Appeals Period (date) •Appeal Filed (date) Appeal Scheduled (date) Appeal Decision Authority Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date Decision Complete (date) l .IL 71( 211 ; 11 g// o"ll' »i Pine Street / r-41-1 11 \--jr-- f.-- f---i C • . ((Water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR R----- DATE MAY 13, 1993 SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW OF CUB OFFICE RENOVATION, 110 EAST PINE STREET (CASE NO DR/93-11) The proposed East Junior High School reuse/renovation plan was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Heritage Preservation Commission) May 3, 1993 and the Planning Commission on May 10, 1993 The attached staff report and project submittal document describe the project There are sixteen conditions of approval recommended by the two City Design Review Agencies The conditions basically require additional Design Review Committee review and comment on project design details that are not available at this time The office use is a permitted use in the Public Administrative/Office, PA, Zoning District Required parking for the use is located on the east office site (58 spaces) and west public parking lot (171 spaces) Fourteen of the public lot spaces are located along Fourth Street It is proposed that they be constructed as needed and not as part of the initial construction phase The proposal has benefited from the public hearings and Design Review The service area has been moved from the south (residential side) to the north (commercial side) of the building The mechanical equipment has been relocated to minimize visual or noise impact Parking on the east site has been increased from 34 stalls to 58 stalls and other changes made to improve the project Details of design review, as conditioned, will have to be completed before building permits for the project are issued This review completes the Council plan approval for the project A related action regarding the required TIF amendment appears elsewhere on the agenda RECOMMENDATION The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission unanimously recommended project approval as conditioned ATTACHMENTS - Planning Commission Staff Report - DP/93-11 - Application and submittal - DR/93-11 CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 i • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO DR/93-11 Project Location 110 East Pine Street Date May 13, 1993 Zoning District Public Administrative/Office, PA Applicant's Name BWBR Architects, Inc Type of Application Design Review Project Description The application is for renovation of and adaptive reuse of the East Junior High Building for an office use The 1930 Junior High is a good example of a Moderne Style school building that was typical of tne times The renovation plans reorientate the building from the south (Pine Street) to the north (Third Street/Downtown) by relocating the main entryway and constructing a three story atrium Changes to the extension of tne building are mainly on the north elevation The emergency metal stairways are eliminated and replaced with windows Windows similar to the existing windows are addea on either side of tne old stairs are open on the building to the north A three story atrium entryway opens the interior of the building to natural light and the sloped metal roofed atrium lowers the profile of that new building element and merges it into scale with the building The cupola on the building is reminiscent of the Central School which once stood on this site The west, south and east building faces remain as they currently exist Rooftop mechanical equipment are shown in approximately the middle of the roof This should minimize the view from the south or north sides Additional consideration should be paid to the location of the mechanical regarding noise and view No landscape plan has been submitted This plan should coordinate with the landscaping across the street on the West Parking Lot site No trash storage area is located on the site plan The landscape plan is conceptual only and lacks detail The parking layout shows a turn -around and drop-off to accommodate off site parkers A lighting plan will be required before final project approval The lighting plan should indicate fixture type, location, height, and direct lighting down so the light source can not be seen from adjacent streets The color of the atrium should be a color compatible with the existing building, possibly a brick, grey or dark green color No signage is proposed If any signage is requested, it must go through Design Review If a sign is desired, a low profile ground mounted sign along Third Street near the driveway entry is suggested 1 • • It is difficult to see from the site plan but a sidewalk snould be constructed from the entryway to Third Street connecting to the west site parking lot Before final approval of the design, additional detail should be provided as listed in the conditions of approval Parking demand for the 67,199 square foot building is 224 spaces Fifty eight spaces are provided on the east site and the public lot across the street will provide 171 spaces, total 229 spaces Recommendation Approval Findings The renovation and adaptive reuse is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines Conditions of Approval i' A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval The plan shall indicate plant type, size, location as shown conceptually in the proposed plans 2-- No trees by the ravines to the north and east sides of the building shall be cut or removed without approval by the Community Development Director 3 A light plan shall be submitted showing the fixture type, location and lighting pattern Lighting shall be maintained on site and the light source shall not be visible from adjacent areas 4 There shall be no night lighting to the south and east of the building 5 The color of tne atrium and window color shall be reviewed 6 A sidewalk shall be constructed from the north building entrance to Third Street and West Parking Lot ►a 7 If trash is not kept outside, it should be screened by a structure compatible with the color and material in the school building as approved by the City 8 No signage is approved for the building Any signage otner than parking lot directional signage shall require design review 9 The service entrance and access to the building should be located to the northeast side of the building 10 The material of the mullion of the atrium and tne window alignment of this atrium shall line with the existing windows 11 The mechanical equipment shall be placed on the roof behind the atrium 12 The service road on the east side of the building shall be remain as a minimum service road • • • 13 The east site shall accommodate maximum on -site parking consistent with good circulation 14 The ravine area shall be cleaned up (dead trees removed and trash and garbage removed) 15 There shall be no CUB employee parking on Pine Street between Third and Broadway 16 The steeply sloped land shall be cleared of debris and dead vegetation and maintained in a natural condition Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendation Approval as conditioned Attachment Application and plans Planning Commission Recommendation Approval as conditioned • • • CASE NUMBER Case 10 Tibor Fee Paid Date Fled PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property 110 Pine Street - Logal Description of Property; Name Cub Foods, a Division of SUPERVALU, Inc Owner Address 126 Water Street Phone 779-2025 Applicant (if other than owner) Name BWBR Architects, Inc Address 400 Sibley St , Suite 500 Phone See attached sheet 222-3701 Type of Request; ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Proliminriry Plat ___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Pi..t ___ Variance ___ Other Design Permit Description of Request Rgnovation of existing east junior high school to Cub Foods Coruprate Headsuarters (See attached) *NOTICE ENGINNEERING FEES MAY BE BILLED TO APPLICANT Signature of Applicant Date of Public Hearing HPC May 3, 1993, Planning Commission May 10, 1993 NOTE Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following 1 North direction 2 Location of proposed structure on lot 3 Dimensions of front and side set -backs 4 Dimensions of proposed structure 5 Street names 6 Location of adjacent existing buildings 7 Other information as may be requested Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on (date) sublet; to the following conditions _ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on subiect to the following conditions Comments (Use other side). • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO PR/92-57 Planning Commission Meeting November 9, 1992 Project Location 110 East Pine Street Zoning District Public Administrative/Office Applicant's Name CUB Foods Type of Application Parking Review PROJECT DESCRIPTION Review of required parking for conversion of the East Wing of the Junior High School to an office building - Discussion The proposed office use is a permitted use in the Public Administrative/Office District The East Junior High School Building has 63,254 square feet The space includes lunch room, locker rooms and gymnasium The parking requirement for an office use is one space per 300 square feet or 210 spaces for the East Wing Building CUB officials have indicated that, depending on relocation, 175 to 200 employees will be moved from their downtown location to the site A parking lot is located north of the East Junior High Building The existing paved area can accommodate approximately 70 spaces dependent on layout Tnis lot could be affected by the reorientation of the building entrance a+tay from the Pine Street residential area to the north The plans for the renovation are not yet available for review in conjunction with parking --z CUB is purchasing the West Wing of the -Junior High site and giving that building and site to the City The intent of the City is to provide parking on the West Building site for the East Building office use and study the reuse of the West Building A review of the West site parking areas indicates that approximately 137 spaces can be provided in three locations (See attached maps ) The Lower Third parking lot can accommodate 75 spaces with minimal retaining wall construction As many as 87 spaces could be accommodated at this location with major retaining wall construction The driveway and adjacent area to the South of the school power plant can accommodate 35 spaces with the recontouring of the sloped area North of Pine Street and removal of the garage behind the school and boiler plant The third West Building parking area is located just off Fourth Street behind the school Depending on design, that lot can accommodate 27 cars All the West building sites are within 300 feet of the office use as required by the Zoning Ordinance The Fourth Street site may not be needed based on employee relocation and final parking lot design The total supply of East and West on -site parking is 207 spaces This number may vary dependent on final parking lot design and construction As with other • • development projects, this review does not include on -street parking, although parking spaces are available on South Third and South Fourth Street The parking situation will be monitored to make sure employees are parking in designated areas and not impacting the adjacent residential area One way of managing parking is to assign an actual space to each employee Other methods of reducing parking demand, such as car pooling or ride sharing can reduce parking demand Also, the parking lots can be designed for some compact space which can increase the parking supply by 10 to 15% The City of Stillwater is beginning to study the reuse of the West Junior High The Stillwater Junior High Reuses Study prepared by the Preservation Alliance is provided as background information A Task Force will study the possibility of converting the school to a community center with a variety of activities Current plans call for closing tne West Junior High after the current 1992-93 school year A reuse decision should be made by June 1994 It is probable that the arrangement of parking described above will not oe the final lot configuration and design for the office use and possible West Building reuse The on -site soace can adequately provide for the initial year of office operation After the West Building reuse study is concluded, and its future use determined, a new review of parking will be required to make sure there is adequate parking for the office use and West Building use Dependent on West Building use, a shared parking arrangement may work for some of the West Building use after normal working hours RECOMMENDATION Approval CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 Two hundred on -site parking spaces shall be provided in the four lots, East Building (70 spaces), Lower Third (75) spaces, Upper Tnird (35) spaces and Fourth Street (27 spaces) 2 All office employees shall park in tne above designated lots 3 All lots shall be paved and striped with safe access as approved by the City Engineer 4 This parking approval is good for one year after tne East Building occupancy and shall be reviewed by the City in June 1994 to reconsider the parking arrangement and future use of the West Building 5 The frontyard (Pine Street) and street sideyard (Third Street) of tne East office site shall remain in landscaping and not be converted to parking 6 The final plans for the parking lot improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director ATTACHMENT Maps • • • CASE NVS:R Ccsc T(c,--ce- Teti-2 -.-5Z Fee °c c TD ov Z'!Dc'e PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORA', Street Locct,cr of PrvCe, 7y 110 E Pine Street City Of StillMater, Block 35, Lo's 8-22 -Lcccl Doscr,;,t,cr c; Pr cce Owrer. Nc ,e Indepence't School District #831- Address i875 Creelef Street , Phcre 439-8230 Add-ers 127 Water Street P';cre 779-2052 iy; e c, Recuest _-- Recer ;g _-- Apprevcl o; Prel, ;;ir,c-y No: Scec cl Use Perrnt7 ___ Approval of F,ncl Plc; _-- Vc-,cr,cz _-- Other 14.- __ af-W3— Descr ipt.on of Resuesi. re "ieW o f __.k,.1.:y_na.tj.g_Sor approximately 200 enplo,rees parking. spaces , Will be planned for the East and West Junior Hign School Parcels Sicnc7ure of Applicant. _.1 � DS Data of PubIic hearing NOT:..' Sk ch of proposea prover y a d structure to be czar% or. Coca OI 4:1 :Or= Or at- tic :ea, snowing tr e g 1 North aira_ton. 2 Loca..on o: proeosed str,.cture on Ict. 3 Dire' s.ors oI izont .nc s ce se-oacks 4 Dinens.ors oL proposes strt.cture. 5 Street na-es 6 Locator. o: ac ac0._nt east rg ouucargs 7 Other i:..:er ato - as may be ragLes`a.c. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Com,mics.cr. cn (date) sJblec: to the following. c;,rc,-,crs. Aap-cved _- De :sec' ___ by e Ccunc'I cn 1 +:.„ s.,blec4 .o ..,� fcllow,r,g ccr.c,t,or.s. Cc,-zre ;j.s n ica n+t+n. ,]„\ MEMORANDUM TO Planning Commission FR Steve Russell, Community Development Director DA January 4, 1995 RE REVIEW OF GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PROJECT CHANGES FOR STILLWATER GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SUP/94-6 Since the city approval of the special use permit, the final grading/drainage plan and landscape plan has been revised The grading/drainage plan is being reviewed by the city engineer to make sure that project runoff will not impact adjacent properties The landscape plan has been modified to accommodate the revised grading/drainage plan ` Neighbors have expressed concerns with the project construction and have been notified of this meeting Recommendation Review project changes particularly the revised landscape plan Condition of Approval 1 Any erosion or siltation caused by site runoff shall be repaired or cleaned up by Good Samaritan • 17 / -/ 4 ® // / December 27, 1994 Mr Klayton Eckles City Engineer City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Klayton 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE 200 SEH CENTER ST PAUL MN 55110 612 490 2000 800 325 2055 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION RE Stillwater, Minnesota Good Samantan Center Drainage Investigation SEH No A-DESIG9401 00 In response to the meeting held in your office on December 13,1994 with Dick Moore, Russ Rosa and Ann Terwedo, we are providing the following information in advance of the January 9 1995 Planning Commission meeting to address runoff and screening issues The residents adjacent to the Good Samaritan site have expressed apparent concern over the function of the pond, the direction of discharge and a number of other issues related to runoff from the site The attachment illustrates the project site relative to the adjacent properties and indicates the current direction of drainage for the site As we have previously indicated, the ponding area is designed to function in a wet/dry manner That is, the pond will temporarily detain runoff until it can dram dry after a rainfall event The discharge from the pond is designed to control the rate of runoff for both the 1 year and 100 year events to that rate which currently discharges from the site in the undeveloped condition Referring to our computations dated July 11 1994, as previously submitted to you, the 1 year and 100 year discharges from the site in the existing condition are 0 5 cfs and 4 4 cfs, respectively The second attachment illustrates the area contributing runoff to the pond The pond is designed to control runoff to the pond to the rates currently discharging from the site Current runoff conditions from the site tend to pond water on the property directly to the south of the site as indicated on Attachment 1 Under fmal grading conditions of the site, water is diverted east and is contained in the pond which ultimately discharges along the property line and to an existing swale through the backyards of the properties abutting North William Street The pond out, a 24 culvert under the berm, was apparently 1 foot too high With the elevation lowered, the pipe will discharge in a sump condition That is, water will flow out of the pipe and then rise up to flow out in a southwesterly direction into the existing swale This condition will help by reducing some of the energy of the discharge and will be less unsightly Additional landscape screening could be planned around the outlet area to reduce the negative visual impact that may be perceived by the residents SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC MINNEAPOLIS MN ST CLOUD MN CHIPPEWA FALLS WI MADISON WI Mr Klayton Eckles December 27, 1994 Page 2 Implementation of the grading plan does not change the current rate of discharge from the site from existing conditions Furthermore, the grading should be an improvement to the property lying directly to the south of the site since runoff from the site will be contained m the pond and discharged m a more southwesterly direction, reducing water ponding in the backyard as was noted by the homeowner during our preliminary field visit in July of 1994 One fmal modification to the grading plan will be to grade a very slight low point in the berm that contains the pond on the south and east sides The purpose of the berm will be to allow water to overflow southeasterly in the direction which will prevent water from reaching the low property to the south This overflow would function only in the event of a severe storm or plugging of the outlet pipe The intention of the overflow would be to allow runoff to flow in the same direction as the pipe outlet Klayton, we are prepared to present this information to the Planning Commission on January 9 If you require any additional information in advance of the meeting, please call me direct at 490- 2028 Sincerely, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc -1411A^I''' Mark L Lobermeier, P E Project Engineer tlo Attachments c Steve Russell, City of Stillwater Dick Moore, SEH Russ Rosa, Project Manager • • • • �Illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA December 27, 1994 RE SPECIAL USE PERMIT Dear Property Owner The City of Stillwater will review the landscape plan fro Good Samaritan Center at 1119 Owens Street North, Charles Huyink, applicant Case No SUP/94-6 The Planning Commission will be reviewing this case at a public heanng on Monday, January 9, 1995, at 7 p m , in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street If you have any comments or concerns regarding this review, please attend the meeting If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to call the Community Development Department at 439-6121 Enclosure Steve Russell Community Development Director CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 cl t M.t..u„ lorra ta mat r runt lot 14 raw (I IIMa1A Asap suit] SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN BERGLY LANDSCAPE ARCiITECTS AND PLANNERS 365 East Kelogg Bc ievard Sant Pal, Mnnesota 55101 612 221 0401 Fax. 612 297 6817 wr1lc Iar entrance 0 k 6tr..t rM Bterst --whka4 .ntr rartal 1st 72 tpsces (n h.ilne 4 h nd u p stall J mid Out pdwtrls am r It Prellmlrury Concept Ilan for the West Parking Area -.iL��lY1 L-t9 w e r (e I LEGEND MISCELLANEOUS exietJng contours to remain proposed contours property line haul poi t (epib • m y M 1 4 deco Ms pal and fnu t.1 Int. pretha .h Mar a d/ r artwork) r r*I a be (I IdIt4h /lcp ta�J 5rrE ELEMENTS retaining wall ornamental fence with 'tone columns ornamental light standard parking lot light standard J I IL bituminous parking lot Stillwater Minnesota 28 Apr111995 4 • d North Scale 1 e 3O l t 1 concrete walk paver surfacing 6tepe SITE FURNf1URE ornamental bench ornamental bench with chairs PLANTINGS street tree In tree grates or pavans columnar shade treed evergreen trace screen hedge ornamental shrubs and perennials r • • f _11 LH_ A f'�,tr r,\ / Arip 1-1 C)/N,7 oo SNl'44il1 J2 [ID / • 4t t 'AS �— /A/ PLACE • WEST 'N I L sro 01, 4� /171-d' -0EGL to &E. P_ 2 / 99 / x/si A16 i1-CILlTi r•• • •OP• • • •.•. 1 • •••••11 • • • • • •••i 0 0 Los# • dia Ci7;171 Po �AT/V 6q-�E,4 Sue- 192E4 bO(%I DA41e.`' Low /7fE4 .'lau 92S ti Akk/ ICETA /A/M16? WALL t J l Dg,✓- wq y - "rzz 'Nv 91,q I7 oo0 Sn r i ►11 f\J L IZ 11-rVieJ-1 M E /AT /\ ID 2 WEsi W► LI�►►�S • • \J) • z s -r r ! L. W ` ►? , M , IJ kJ g s o A �„ _ 1/-o "OLCrill P___ 21 l �a • • • To: Stillwater Planning Commission Jan 4, 1995 From: Frey Lube, Inc Sub] : Meeting of Jan 9 1995 Case No SUP/94-65 Due to the replatting of outlot C of the Stillwater Marketplace in November of 1994, there is now a resurvey of that particular property currently in progress Therefore a complete grading plan will not be available at this time I hereby request that the hearing for the special use permit be postponed until the February meeting Your patience and understanding is, and always appreciated e Sincerely, ,(-)Pesie/it(2 2 Robert A Fr'ey Frey Lube, Inc 0 MEMORANDUM TO Planning Commission 40FR Planning Staff DA January 199� RE REZONING 2001 WASHINGTON AVE CASE NO ZAM/95 4 Background The 1979 Comprehensive Plan Policies addressed the development of the Industrial Park to serve commercial and industrial development The road system has been developed for these purposes In 1990 the city adopted the West Business Park Plan an amendment to Stillwaters Comprehensive Plan This plan has established goals and objectives for future development of the area which clearly provide an appropriate framework for industrial and commercial development These policies include • Encourage new land uses compatible with existing land uses • Provide adequate land for industrial development of the next 20 years • Provide foi compatible mix of industrial office service commercial and community uses through the area land use plan The land use plan identified industrial (BP I) zoning north of Curve Crest Blvd and east of Northv.estern Avenue commercial land uses were identified south of Tower Drive and along Highway 5 due to the existing land uses and visibility to major highways Discussion The proposal by Andersen Windows to rezone 2001 Washington Avenue from (BP C) Commercial to (BP I) Industrial is to allow the land to be used for a light manufacturing warehouse and office use •Presently the commercial zoning (BP C) does not allow for manufacturing or warehouse uses to be located in this area However office uses would be permitted By rezoning this area manufacturing uses are permitted and warehouse uses permitted with a special use permit The adjacent existing land uses to the property include a motel and carwash to the east office service and a restaurant use to the west office and retail to the north and Highway 36 to the -south as outlined General retail has shifted in the past year to the west at the Stillwater Market Place location Rezoning this parcel from commercial to industrial would not affect land available for commercial purposes Also the policies outlined form the West Business Park Plan are consistent with the proposal Light manufacturing office and warehouse uses are compatible with the adjacent land uses as outlined and would not negatively impact those uses The proposal provides for a mix of uses in the area The road system in the Business Park and Highway 36 can provide for the proposed land uses In fact the proposed use will have less of an impact on the existing transportation system Findings The proposed rezoning is consistent with the policies in the West Stillwater Business Park Plan an element of the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons I The proposed uses are compatible with the existing land uses 2 The proposed uses provide for a mix of industrial office service commercial and community uses Staff Recommendation Approval • 0 • EXISTING ZONING Business Park 41 al bp-c bp-1 bp-o c ca cbd 1 pa r1 r4 I Ira rb rch rcm • HWAY NO.36 Cra- • OPLE�NS ST N L7 p►PCEL 1 co 0 L7 PLnCEL rn 47 /r CP?_:r �1.1 0 cc Gurl C1 FR HIGHLt ND CT 0 , Cr PARCEL 4 / 1 r I 1 1 a 1- TAGE RDAD /41 1/vVAV 3 \E2 ►.11 IU �-- SV i T -11 ApTAceNT LAND uses IC[1' \ 11 1-11-111) i' Y\ ZAM/95 -4 n cnm?Arf <!A!lr5 Lor11c1 cN t01L10< on C1r111(L_LIILILQLY Igw(1 on --I I lI IJ 1 r I C11410v B1 "C 110111 11U 0 SITE I c cncf <,< , • • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No SUP/DR/95 5 Planning Commission Date January 9 1995 Project Location 2001 Washington Avenue Zoning District Business Park District Applicant's Name Andersen Windows Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit to conduct a warehouse light manufacturing, office use / C Discussion The request is to reuse the entire "old" CUB Store as a light manufacturing, warehouse office use Andersen s will employ approximately 95 to 120 individuals at this location The warehouse use will employ 10 to 15 people on three shifts The light manufacturing use will employ 10 to 15 on one shift A majority of the employees, 75 to 90, will be in the office Traffic As outlined in the attached letter and analysis of truck traffic, according to Andersen representatives, there will be 2 350 less trips outgoing and incoming to the site per year or 34 less trips per weeks Also there will be no customer traffic generated by this use since this site will no longer be a retail outlet CUB presently generals 4,800 cars per day The local streets in the Business Park have been upgraded to four lanes with raised medians and signals The existing road system can accommodate truck traffic directly to Highway 36 or to County Road 5 Parking Demand The warehouse use in the structure will be 67,200 sq ft According to the Stillwater parking regulations Subd 26 of Chapter 31 01 of the City Code the demand will be approximately 67 parking spaces The light manufacturing use of 16 800 sq ft will generate 51 parking spaces and the 9,500 sq ft of office space use will generate 47 parking spaces There would therefore, be a total parking demand of 165 parking spaces The existing lot presently has approximately 597 parking spaces available The site can accommodate all the uses proposed Trailer parking on the site will be located along the east side of the building as presently exists There will be no increase in the trailer parking by the change from a retail use to manufacturing/office/warehousing The rezoning request (ZAM/95 4) is to allow this use by a special use permit identifies adjacent land uses There will be no exterior noise level or visual impacts which would negatively impact adjacent properties The Design Review Committee reviewed and approved the landscape plan and signage proposal at their regular meeting on January 5 199s They approved the plan and felt in would actually improve the site The report is attached Findings The proposal meets the policies of the West Business Park Land Use Plan and Industrial Zoning (BP-1) Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval S 1 The phase II landscaping shall be done within 18 months 2 There shall be no outside storage of materials on site Attachments Application package • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/DR/95 PROJECT LOCATION 2001 Washington Avenue COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT Business Park Commercial ZONING DISTRICT BP-C FLOOD PLAIN No SHORELAND/BLUFFLAND No APPLICANT'S NAME Andersen Windows TYPE OF APPLICATION Design Review PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design Review for signage and landscaping for an office/warehouse/light industrial use at 2001 Washington Avenue DISCUSSION The request is to use the "old" Cub Foods Grocery Store as an office/warehouse/light industrial use The building will essentially stay the same with modifications to the signage and landscaping Theie will be no additional air ventilation systems added to the roof of the structure All existing Cub Foods and tenant signage will be removed along with the pylon sign Andersen Windows will then add one sign in the brown band area above the main entrance The sign will be appiouimately 30 feet x 2 feet Landscaping will be added along the east property line as well as in front of the main entrance which will soften the look of this large parking lot The landscaping will be done in two phases, the first phase includes all the landscaping on the east property line and the second in front of the building The overhead lighting will be removed along the south border of the property No other lighting will be added FINDINGS The pioposal meets the intent of the Business Park Design Guidelines and Sign Ordinance STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION Approval • s ANDERSEN CORPORATION December 23 1994 Stillwater Planning Commission/City Council The following is a description of how the existing Cub facility would be utilized by Andersen Corporation The overall operation will be a combination of warehousing Tight manufacturing and office personnel The warehouse will utilize about 80% of the floor space and would operate on three shifts Items that will be stored in the warehouse consists of hardware screws vinyl parts extension jambs and items of this sort It will take approximately 10 15 people to manage and maintain the warehouse This will occupy approximately 67 200 square feet of floor space Light manufacturing will occupy the remaining portion of the floor space This will consist of a one shift low volume assembly line which uses small clamps nailer drills and pumps This line is used to produce obsolete items that we no longer manufacture on a continuous basis It will take approximately 10 15 people to operate the light manufacturing area which will use about 16 800 square feet There will not be any industnal equipment (fans grinders filter systems etc) added to the exterior of the current building There is 9 500 square feet of office space on a mezzanine We would locate approximately 75 90 office personnel in this area These offices would be utilized on the day shift only which will range from 6 00 AM to 5 00 PM The material handling equipment that will be used to service the warehouse and manufactunng area will consist of 5 6 electric forklifts (or equivalent type of equipment) We use electnc equipment because they are quiet and do not emit carbon monoxide Our truck traffic is based on operating Monday through Fnday with an occasional Saturday Two thirds of the truck traffic will be dunng the day time hours The daily tnps will increase dunng our peak season (June August) and will decrease throughout the rest of the year Andersen annual inbound tnps from outside suppliers is approximately 2 600 trips per year or having an average of eleven tnps per day The trips projected from the current Cub Building to the Bayport facility will be approximately 4 000 trips per year or an average of 17 per day Our overall trucking will be approximately 6 600 tnps per year or 140 trips per week The current truck traffic at the Cub facility is based on a seven day operation Their daily average tnps is 26 The weekly average is 174 or 8 950 trips per year In comparison between the two operations Andersen will have an estimated 2 350 less tnps per year or 34 less trips per week There would also be substantially less automobile traffic due to the change in how the property will be utilized Approximately 150 200 parking spaces will be used for Andersen personnel with a few of those spaces being dedicated to visitors Trailer parking will stay about the same as Cub s There are eight spaces allowed on the North East comer of the building for parking trailers The overall site will be reviewed in the future for further expansion needs Sincerely Jerry Larson I00 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH BAYPORT MINNESOTA 55003 1096 612 439 5150 • • • Operation: - Warehousing and Light Manufacturing • Warehouse 3 shifts hardware, screws, vinyl parts, ext jambs, etc • Light Manufacturing 1 shift clamps, nailers, pumps, small assembly line • Offices 1 shift consist - Personnel • Warehouse 10 - 15 • Manufacturing 10 - 15 • Office 75 - 90 Total 95 - 120 - Material Handling Equipment • 5-6 Electric Forklifts (or equivalent type of equipment) Note: There will not be any industrial equipment (fans, grinders, filter systems, etc) added to the exterior of the current building • • Truck Traffic: - AW Annual Trips • Supplier Inbound 2600 per year or 11 per day avg • CUB to Bayport 4000 per year or 17 per day avg Total 6600 per year or 28 per day avg (140/wk) Note 1 Operating Monday - Friday with an occasional Saturday 2 2/3 of the truck traffic will be during the daytime hours 3 The daily trips will increase during the peak season (June - August) and will decrease throughout the rest of the year - CUB Annual Trips • Supplier Inbound 26 trips/day x 6 days + 18 trips/Sun = 174 trips/wk 174 trips/wk - 7 days = 24 86 per day avg 24 86 trips/day x 360 days/year = 8,950 trips/year - CUB Trips -vs- AW Trips • CUB Truck Trips per year 8,950 • AW Truck Trips per year 6,600 Less AW Truck Trips per year 2,350 or (174 trips/wk CUB - 140 trips/wk AW = 34 Tess trips/wk AW) • There would also be substantially Tess automobile traffic due to the change in how this property would be utilized re A: ar. 11.•&-#i .f7,44V • • s • -', • ' ,..77 „7,,,, .4r.. p-,,w;--,4- -/---, -- ...0....1hr.,5., ...., .,..,- t..., ,,,x-, ---,,,,v",,, ,- , _3;5. f,,, , ..- #. 4 04. 4*-nrak#S71.---,..2gr..:# - 1_4_ •+• • e.X..# • - ••i• 1.4`. 3 % • "w- th,t- - - • #6!#,e,..34ct,.. ?Ea' s• • sr - ` -4•10L-4.~1%-^—e%- - , Ar' y- - •1 -5,--"," "`-'1.-3'.1 DAPIlilibt '-r1P.." IPVIT:"' .-"'-'1 t ter— e- .....0, .3... 43b.44....k. ... if,. .1.-.4,,,,,:e • • . _ I ,, r, 'SA' -....TAX•r—r% . ;77Lii-v----4-4161.01'.4" •:" •Ve A " 1.6.7,.....,441aQ Lr", "IA -•• -. . I .... t t .r.- 0 ... i",7 t• ',-.ii- _ . • '. 74 ....-1,er,....-i.,10 .1 A ...... 1f.. A { ,...... ... .....• ".. 41 .44 A. fifri fl... 44 ,e..7a4 A ,-.4. 1: -....X.f.&420, -fte''2;111.4. - . rf• ...TO: -• • • -• •-: .. ..' .7 ''. ti .. _,.:,.„..„ .,........4:.. ......v..,....;„...,..,...:,....444,..:..:Fr,.-:::...e,..v.,,.....4.,..1... ...........,.,.:.;•-.:,:;:i,.-et.:::4.i.-_,,,,::.,,,--.g.,........ 5. , %49:004.4i1,-•. al. .,••• ,...," fr. -`; .f.f...-L.,-....kl.,... --.- Nr-,-.......... 11## • #1:###r;S:;:are,,-• V6gelOPPW., *.13 Vart#47' is-11.`r-C• :147: ;Zak' .e. I:- ,- 34•:;-'1,e, .... .1. ix isat„. , ' , , i , 9 - - ---;itfka-41.4;tE gel ,. ... ...,.. ...., , ....;.c. '4 - .,!, %"., 4-"--•.- •tr.t,....,h4i1".':, k...)-i'jr— h-r `1:-.?, 4V1;5.. ;1.7.--,:-- -4-.:171-;c40,1;414-4t-tz.lrl-e-C -4 4 rA-4 er"4-,,-3-•V.-1 r#*" 1r A\ as.Vi 441 )1 C6144fT41)+.4,tr. s a PP. Jr. ,r4f14 4 -tyr,,etrrkorn 1.14.2,14 -v.4 ••••••At, `LP # J.-# 6 xi- 4 41 tt.7 r- - tAT roa. 7 # #:‘ 4 c$1?1:k7;.;14:;:X. 4sto 44",po .^.." -0 4 .‘ J Ir. "1 A? 1 ,.7.1!srzfor rl• =iv; ..tbrialc'2141--kik444 t/c•-, •SP" 1 -strck u 1/1 „rt., iictrIfF ,aay,42. ' A x, 4 04.4- 11;4 Krat4;404.T.,,,ssl 1, r# t - Vt-¢ • • EKczY-1tJ4.• $ul b) R\. S-r 1aNte • CJ,G44e t""+4 t • • Ex ASN • tx OAK. Ex ASH Ex MIAIT JULEP JiJAIIPER Ex Couiritifift. (3vckTHoanl Ell rEGHNEY nfiettIPV,rnt Et DwF !SR►JTI ODGWOoo -?,__, \,\,-v ?.._to Orr P R R CONCRtTF CUR (TpP) It 1 N Cr (_* -',\_) \ A--- 1 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No SUP/95-1 Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995 Project Location 515 South Sixth Street Zoning District RB, Two Family Residential Applicant's Name William Wahlberg Type of Application Special use permit Project Description A special use permit to conduct a beauty shop out of a residential structure at 515 South Sixth Street Discussion The request is to conduct a single chair hair salon which would employ only the occupant of the home The applicant has indicated that there are approximately four (4) parking spaces on the site which could accommodate customer parking Staff visited the site and found this to be true Mr Wahlberg will have a site plan prepared at meeting time for the commission's review No one will be employed by Mr Wahlberg Findings The proposal meets the intent of the land use plan and zoning ordinance Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 No exterior signage is allowed 2 No employees shall be allowed 3 Proof of state operating licenses shall be submitted for the file 4 One salon chair is allowed Attachments Letter Application • • • /2 - 7 -94/ 70 \f /-I DM IT SAY CON , SUE RES1CT� uL_L_' REQUESI PERM SS1 cN To oETP N P\ SPEE N PERMIT FoR A or-PER5rnJ NA1R CP\tME SHOP VvE \PNE PLENT OF OFF - 3WEE T PARKING (3-F cJT DR\V ExNp\`! CN E IN C ROT AS CN L I ONE CAR No0 LD t.5u r\LL'1 8E }ARE- \NE FEEL IT w0JL1 BE A 5E NEB IT To DOR nMMU N IT, 'P5 soN\EONE w01I-D ' PIRGUN.D 3NG THE DP'(- HELPFUL IF NEI AEORNCC CNILF (ET 1�XED CC THE \oUSE ACC i bENi ALLY, DR it) WA T cif FDR DUPC W (5Ms \NE ALSO FEEL - i 1�15 \ U ) NcT BE PS DIs vAi\nsa_ To P CND THERE Ana mo SMELLS CP NU5E OUST CAE OF OUR 43AL NOPE you BRAN T US TH15 PERMIT 4- 1F YOU HIVE ANY QuEsT ►ONS, PLEP\SE Ma. US, 'i30 -254/0 012 35) --71441 iNAN K you bt Li_ `c\; AH LBERG PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance X Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment Other Engineering Review Fee Total Fee Case No SUPA Date 7" Fee Paid i %Q `7"- FEE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection •vith any application Address of Project 5 ic5 G -1 k 5T �D Zoning District 4 Description of Project ,jinsi O'i scI1 Vc lows i CC ALL Assessors Parcel No 9 3 05— U 3 I G ,rv-ic, II bee (.4.1 f me,-5 I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner LC%11ic,,-v1 LA) C4%I1(bY J Mailing Address 5 i j f� th St 50 Telephone No 3 S / 7',' 6r Signature GO Ca. GcJ -ye Representative Mailing Address Telephone No Signature Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action • Lot Size (dimensions) 6 x /50 sq ft ' 7UU Total Land Area Cj qp- ct fl Hight of Buildings Stoma Feet Principal / Art, A 7 Zya Accessory / Total Floor Area gip, +160 sq ft bo-vh `iktap, 1150 Q t r 1 Proposed floor area 45c, Ae, , sq ft ork s J Building Coverage,Pg, l,y.o sq ft Paved Impervious Area 400 sq ft Jo x 30 Number of off street parking spaces 1- C A iCE Date of Public Hearing is APPEALS BUILDING MOVING PERMITS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN DESIGN PERMIT t_J GRADING PERMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON SITE SEWER PERMIT SITE ALTERATION PERMIT VARIANCE VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT ZONING AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT OTHER Record of Action on Application Decision Authority Date of Action Decision by Authority Appeals Period (date) Appeal Filed (date) Appeal Scheduled (date) Appeal Decision Authority Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date Decision Complete (date) 0 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/95-6 • Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995 Project Location 704 South First Street Zoning District RB - Two Family Residential Applicant's name Gary Vizenor, Jr Type of application Special Use Permit Project description A special Use Permit to conduct a 3-bedroom Bed and Breakfast Discussion The request is to conduct a 3-bedroom bed and breakfast in a 105 year old Queen -Anne Victoiian home at 704 South First Street Major restoration of the exterior of the home has been conducted during the last two years The interior main rooms are intact including all original pocket doors and stained glass windows The kitchen has been updated along with major interior work on the attic It has been converted to a single bedroom In order to provide for three bed and breakfast rooms, minimal work needs to be done These are shoe n on the building floor plan and include opening two doorways into existing bedrooms from proposed or existing bathrooms No structural elements will be changed The applicants have stated that one individual will be living on -site as the owner/manager All other issues relating to the bed and breakfast seem to be covered in the applicant's submission packet with the exception of signage One four square foot sign is allowed •The proposed parking plan includes developing four parking spaces for the bed and breakfast use This is consistent with the ordinance Three parking spaces will be used for the bed and breakfast and one for owner/manager An additional parking space will be located in the can cage house Low perimeter lighting should be installed along the 16 feet walk between the parking lot and homes Landscaping to include coniferous trees and low hedges should be planted along the north side of the parking lot in order to buffer the parking lot from the street Heritage Preservation Commission Review The Heritage Pieservation Commission reviewed the proposal at their regular meeting on January 4, 1995 A condition in the bed and breakfast ordinance requires that the Heritage Preservation Commission review bed and breakfast proposals to determine if the size of the home and if the number of original bedrooms can accommodate the proposed use In this case, the home is 3,154 square feet and has four original bedrooms The commission agreed that this home met these conditions Conditions of approval See attached Recommendation Approval Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance • Attachments Application package • • • Case No SUP/95-6 Conditions of Approval 1 All building and fire inspections shall be conducted p►ior to the business being conducted 2 A county inspection report along with other proof of operation licenses and state sales and use tax numbers shall be submitted to the community development department 3 No guest parking is allowed on the street 4 Guest parking shall be signed The type of signage shall be reviewed by the planning staff 5 The dining facilities are not open to the public including guests from other bed and breakfast establishments 6 City staff shall review the style, size and location of the sign The sign shall be four (4) square feet No other signage is allowed 7 A lighting plan including height and location for the perimeter shall be submitted and approved by the planning department • • • Steetwateit 90te Delievremeat Veal dace oil 7164eae4ota 20 9ete e January 2, 1995 Ann Terwedo Planning City of Stillwater Re Inspection 704 So 1st St Ann On December 27, 1994 I was requested to do an Inspection at 704 So 1st St to determine the improvements to be made to apply for a B&B permit I was met there by Gary Viznor, realtor, who toured me through the structure My findings are as follows 1) A wired interconnected smoke detection system needs to be installed with detectors on each level of the structure 2) Smoke detectors must also be provided in each room used for sleeping These need not be interconnected and can be battry powered 3) The rear stairway should have a twenty minute fire -rated door separating the basemet from the first level It shold also be fitted with an automatic self closer which shold be connected to the smoke detection system Also a like door should be placed to the third floor 4) A fire extinguisher with a minimum rating of 2A10BC shall be mounted in the kitchen area If you have any further questions feel free to contact me at 439-6120 Respect 62‘l Captain Robert C Barthol Inspections/Investigations Stillwater Fire Deptment 216 llama %uat! Soaeet SR,l1watac Well 550,2 (612) 439 6120 (612) 4391318 (612) 439-1313 jax (612) 439-0456 PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 910, Y,im,rh Ott - ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment Other X Engineering Review Fee Total Fee Case No J a/a, Date II : -; Fee Paid FEE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection •with an application Address of Project 704/ 1 S7" $ s0 Assessors Parcel No 93 0 s " o? 00 Zoning District /Q g Description of Project Sipe ci 4/ Ilse Rem, 4- -i-D dpei44-e /'e5, et/e,vc.e, 0.: 3 ues4- 1c"-i Bed and ,tg/tea_ it- -firms - t"sfa,b/shtie Al -A- I herebN state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted here ith in all respects to the best of my knoN%ledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used ' 1PoPosed Property Owner «7 h,v 4 Eloise, /9n0-1-04) Mailing Address dog 7 SfAfe Ad I/6 peep PARR-, wr 5-906 7 Telephone No 7/S- 076 9 - 53075 Telephone No y39- 7,06 • Representative G AQ R y V z e ivo /Q 7 A Mailing Address /91'3 So G,Iee/efre S74 Sw, # /913 //4 4 fe r,, /1/1/ s 56c'a Signature .�,a 2 _ 577 1/eSignature Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action Lot Size (dimensions) /35 x /D f sq ft Total Floor Area 3/5l/ sq ft Total Land Area /y e 9C Sg .-+ Proposed floor area figMe_ sq ft Hight of Buildings Stones Feet Building Coverage /an sq ft Principal 3 Paved Impervious Area /6CO sq ft Accessory oZ Number of off street parking spaces 5- Date of Public Hearing is • • • r 1 APPEALS LI F BUILDING MOVING PERMITS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN DESIGN PERMIT GRADING PERMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON SITE SEWER PERMIT 1 SITE ALTERATION PERMIT VARIANCE VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT ZONING AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1 ! 1 i OTHER Record of Action on Application Decision Authority Date of Action Decision by Authorm Appeals Period (date) Appeal Filed (date) Appeal Scheduled (date) Appeal Decision Authority Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date Decision Complete (date) 704 1st ST SO • • Proposed use and operation of Victorian Bed & Breakfast To Planning Commission/Heritage Preservation Commission Submittea before you on this date December 23, 1994 this application to request a special use permit according to the requirements of the City Council for the City of Stillwater, Minnesota A purchase agreement as been consimated between Frank and Jean Kubitschek (sellers) and John and Eloise Anton (purchasers) for the property located at 704 1st St So Stillwater Subject to approval of special use permit to operate residence as a 'Bed & Breakfast Establishment John and Eloise Anton are long -respected homeowners of the New Richmond, UI community, Mr Anton is the owner of his own upholstery and antique furniture restoration business (Anton's Upholstery), having successfully owned and operated his business for 35 years Mrs Anton is the former clerk -treasurer of the City of New Richmond, Ui Mr and Mrs Anton have already successfully restored two historic homes in New Richmond, including the former Governor Knowels' mansion It is the intention of Mr and Mrs Anton to obtain a special use permit for the aforementioned property for the following reason Mr and Mrs Anton, in conjuction with their daughter, Susan Drury wish to operate the proposed property as a Bed & Breakfast facility, according to the restoration guidelines determined by the Heritage Preservation Commission and in full compliance with the Stillwater Code Section 31 01, Subdivision 4 (9) and Subdivision 25 (F) The residence will be operated in strict compliance with the community guidelines, including but not limited to the following facts which denonstate the interest in harmonizing with the immediate neighborhood The home would be offering only 3 guest rooms on a pre reservation basis II The residence is located within walking distance to down- town Stillwater, encouraging walking tours and downtown patronage Page Two • The residence is to be owner -occupied by Susan Drury who will at all times be responsible for the maintance of respectable noise levels and community harmony Ms Drury has proven experience managing a Bed & Breakfast facility, having worked for the Rivertown Inn and Cover Park Manor for a period of one year At which time, Ms Drury left to pursue purchase of this proposed family owned and operated Bed & Breakfast All particular details relative to site plan and diagrams are included as attachments to this application Most importantly, Mr and Mrs Anton and family demonstrated an enduring commitment to preservation of the valued historic treasures, irreplaceable to the greater community of the State of Minnesota and the St Croix River Valley The Anton/Drury family have clearly demonstrated their meticulous and stringent historical accuracy in the restor- ation of the former Governor Knowles' mansion The wish to pay homage to the spirits of the pioneers and forefathers such as James Mulvay who built this original home so long ago in 1890 to cradle the new generation of Americas children The Anton/Drury family wishes, indeed promises, to honor the historic house at 704 1st St So , not only as a place to provide a warm rest and refreshing meal to the cultural tourists visiting their history in Stillwater, but intends to carefully maintain this property, which has been home to ancestors of Minnesota for over one hundred years The spirits of the children raised in this home, from the family with 11 children, 5 of whom grew up to become catholic priests, to the Colemans or Pichardsons of the 19th century, should all be at peace with the knowledge that their home will be certainly maintained with love and devotion into the next generation • • 704 1st St South Proposed 3 guest Bed & Breakfast Conformity to Oriaance #768 1 Zoning The property is presently in the RB zoning district allowing a Bed & Breakfast establishment by special use permit 2 Distance from exsisting Bed & Breakfast establishments The closest existing Bed & Breakfast is the Heirloom located on the corner of 3rd St South and Hancock This would be approximatley 6 blocks away or 1800 lineal feet 3 Serving of Liquor on premises This proposal will not involve the serving of either liquor or wine 4 Lot and home size requirements This home is located on Lots 1,2 and the N1/2 of Lot 3 Blk 2, Churchill Nelson Slaughter Add measuring 135 ft x 104 ft square consisting of 14,040 square ft minimum requirement for a 3 guest room being 10,000 sq ft The home presently consists of 4 bedrooms with a total interior square footage of approximately 3,154 square feet It is proposed and felt that the unique floor plan of this home can facilitate 3 guest rooms comfort- ably, since approximately 80% of the premises can be utilized as guest space Please refer to the following pages for detailed interior measurements 5 Inspections and license requirements This proposal would include conformancy to all state, county, and local regulations Including proof of building, fire and planning inspections, application and obtaining of county Bed & Breakfast license and state sales and use tax number /QL/J 3+i ee+ 3cuf h • /lcLiA) Floor yL) ll =1, z 3 0 0 Q J -c d s4 7, 00 b L DINNIAt4 A60_M _ /y'6 LLP l\ c „.,#PY .coyei k+che,lJ z. / Jr oo M L,V,A) Root' —__ /6'G" PARLocc.R 4. Frio AJ4- ON+^ Y • _ 709 16+ 5+fcd+ Sa u+h and Floo ti. 7q":l' VraA1 4 r 9 oo tab /3ed000M _- • -- — / p'/o • u 3 0 +� 04W.Le/Dery /o' /0'' XL( 91/0" 1 C Jose lose + 'y6'10'I l3edr'oot-4t /3'/0'' ,,o/,9A r t aso 704 5+ s_fpcei- S4Lt -h 3 rd XI/ ii Poo • yy, • • /0' y" kn 5 0 GA fZi I ,9 — S howe r Becl Doom /0 /Do,y.i er 70L/70 1-1 534- + 50(,+h • • 5c0.. I e 1 " O0' Pnesem- S1 h+ ole+0.11 h I� 0 s vim. • • a9 b'r 1 I '* I Flow nr"� C re-b Pore- h CFI uert Crab 5+ Sa - - - H J' > / - re spr,.ce • • • 7O-/ 1 s+ ca I e 1 "= 0 0' S�-ree+ 50 EA+ h /9apoSeol Si h+ ofe+ai 1 show//79 Adpsed P1901-in /4/4ril Cl—C) FIo.r na crab Its `o 11, , 9,ee 99 Porch ';, I F1661.1, 5 ICrtib d I I I,E-I I� t1 I I I II vih Spruce JOY' _ 709 15+ Stree+ 30u+h a-e Floo- • 7y : -L , Pioposed ^08,i+hroot -upd A +ens 2 Q / Al (� , ,, 3 b5' 1 1 tf�i1 T Cl glycodd Pp Vade .A4_h • I ,Qed(1oo K 00 - - - - ia'/0 - - - - - - 2 3 0 v Locire c( 0 r 1 N41 t DooR Pro pa3ed Pr'vR4e _BAIA_ - /0 /0'' wi C lose+ m I iv qv' vI -- iG, y ,, Privkie Acc es.) Close- a x6'10't -1 i I3edPoo 1-1 1 , oi, 9 x r I 1aroID /3'/Di' - I • • • • v "44 1 L-- ""' fl71 „ 2H-Ot55.*"' - '12,1;=e)rf',—*, • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No SUB/PUD/95-2 Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995 Project Location Tuenge Drive and Shelton Street Zoning District Duplex Residential Applicant's Name Paul Schaefer Type of Application Subdivision/Planned Unit Development Project Description The proposal is a 37 lot (36 residential lot and 1 wetland lot) planned unit development A 37 lot subdivision is a part of the planned unit development request The lots are designed to have a zero lot line on one side and minimum 10 feet on the other side - 20 feet from the adjacent residence The residential Tots range in size from 5 386 to 20,098 sq ft Five Thousand square feet minimum is required in the Duplex Residential District R B The lot frontage range from 66 feet for corner Tots to 46 feet typical for interior lots A commercial center is located to the south of the project A fence and evergreens screen the commercial site from the residential site Vacant land is located to the east and the Forest Ridge Development across Tuenge Drive to the west The proposal project is a similar subdivision configuration as the Forest Ridge Development The project plans were referred to Public Works for review and comment Their comments include the need for a grading/drainage/erosion control plan particularly around the wetland and street and the grading impact on lots 3 - 4, 6 - 7 and 17 18, 19, 20 Also, the engineer is recommending that the combined curb cut for two driveways be limited to 25 feet and the cul de sac radius be increased to 55 feet minimum One tree is required to be plated for each lot Park dedication requirements for the land have previously been provided through land dedication A 50 foot setback is required for the designated wetland (not provided for in plan) As a result of these comments, the subdivision may need to be modified and result in the loss of lots Recommendation Approval of concept approval for PUD Approval of preliminary plat subdivision with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The combined driveway fro each structure shall be 25 feet maximum 2 The cul de sac radius shall be 55 feet minimum 3 A grading/drainage/erosion control plan shall be submitted for staff review before council consideration of the concept PUD or preliminary plat (this may result in the loss of lots) 4 An outlet shall be provided for the wetland Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date 42 Fee Paid 'ffgOO ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment Other Pre -Sub -division Engineering Review Fee Total Fee FEE $1900.00 $1,900 00 ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS X No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting maten with any application Address of Project Tuenge Dr $ 6 1 rst bt No Zoning District R2 Description of Project Plat land area into .36 Twin -Home and one Out -lot \\.\l:\ 4151 *O Q. D Lo c. o.t% ts, etbnAN niZction 1. u903. 2 ��✓ Assessor s Parcel No 0 9 0.3 j 2 3 5 /? .7 \-t' I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner Schaeter Development Mailing Address 2 5 81 Co Ra 7 4 St— C ud, Mn 56301 TelephoNo 6 2- 2 5 2 -7 345 Signature Th Any decision made on this proposal ca 5,000 + Lot Size (dimensions) x sq ft Total Land Area 7 2 Acre s Hight of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory .Date of Public Hearing is ,Tanuary 9, 1995 Representative Schaefer Development Mailing Addres _ 5 81 Co Rd 7 4 Clou. Mn_ 56.3U 1 Telep one No : 1 2-2. '-7345 Signatur be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action Total Floor Area sq ft Proposed floor area sq ft Building Coverage sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces I 1 1 I APPEALS BUILDING MOVING PERMITS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN DESIGN PERMIT GRADING PERMIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON SITE SEWER PERMIT SITE ALTERATION PERMIT VARIANCE 1-� VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT I I_ j ZONING AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT OTHER Record of Action on Application Decision Authority Date of Action Decision by Authority Appeals Period (date) Appeal Filed (date) Appeal Scheduled (date) Appeal Decision Authority Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date Decision Complete (date) 61ST STREET NORTH • 1 40 0 LiJ 0 Z LiJ 40 6t,2;638 03 Le100 To50 g365 66 01 7 44 46 01 - r 1-r 1 46 01 1 1 1 46 01 46 01 0 0 8 -J 14 15 O 46 01 46 01 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 46 01 46 01 7 N 0 LJ 16 0 17 0 46 01 O 46 01 1 1 1 0 50 100 150 o IRON MONUMENT SET o IRON MONUMENT FOUND BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM 121 93 IN a I� c o 0 5 46 01 46 01 46 01 18 46 01 1 L--- 0 19 46 01 0 21 05 cn 0 4 67 36 4 r �6 61 y6 L �� - 23 45 22 51 r\e 0 29 46 01 _ 6%34 -7 / —77 / //... 21 N 0 N L=32 01 2a6R 0 � , XI$TINC EA.aAENT UNin N In I I 46 01 49 98 46yQ1_ 41 LOT AREA LOT 1 8003 SO FT LOT 2-4 5659 SQ FT LOT 5 14C98 SO FT LOT 6-10 5981 SQ FT LOT 11 10 750 SO FT LOT 12 8638 SQ FT LOT 13-17 5981 SO FT LOT 18-19 6303 SO FT LOT 21 5842 SQ FT LOT 22 7949 SQ FT 28 II L LOT 23 9110 SO FT LOT 24 6390 SQ FT LOT 25 4948 SQ FT LOT 26 10 744 50 FT� I N C to LOT 27 19 661 SO FT LOT 28 9733 5Q FT LOT 29 20 0098 SO FT LOT 30 12 741 SO FT LOT 31-36 5953 SQ FT LOT 37 8508 SQ FT 46 01 65 121 1,0 80 EME 1.PROPOSED UNE / • 19 9 q /4361ADp Fr C- \ 137,01 \. 01 +/- o cn w LAND SUR\(L1'ORS Ro ST CL6UD MIN ESOTA 11sSOCIAS 1513 WEST ST GERMAIN ST CLOUD MN 56301 PHONE (612) 253-9495 FAX 253-8737 BUILDING SET BACKS NOTE TWIN HOMES WHICH WILL REQUIRE VARIANCES FROM STANDARD 30 FOOT FRONT YARD SET BACK TO 25 FOOT FRONT YARD SET EA(K ARE LOTS 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 do 29 30 FOOT FRONT YARD 10 FOOT SIDE YARD 25 FOOT REAR YARD 30 FOOT CORNER SIDE YARD • F-L SNAKES Fours C9-) tzg&'D rAIPITED PANEL SIM 5-T`tLE TO EKtST • •& 1 & ROT-W —_ op E-wn�ow s) -Area ' 6t6t119 It\inwpfL, oF bt 2fNt �-;- - o (1) h1&N5 ge6' o • AIrVe �1 .„2d-1°C eta. w65 Ei. ft\ . - nA 1 N STF E1 y2= I'-o z4 e y exvisbeD • • • J ‘916(c)4S7M' c r¢am ccle, lam/ \u i( 1 / 0}�_ HO1-2iz LisP cePA2 51O1Ncy EI 11_tvI1 erismpoestf 1GPi dLQOVl1L (ELM SN &1 Fou rz (9-) MAIKITE. D F'AOEL Shari 511.4 STYLE TO Ext<,T I&l1 1\WITh -- N5ON 6164,t t- ANT Ipf� h'� op ht 04>ZINb LD�Vf✓R- FAST -EVP�l -1 - wATag 7Fu 17 ' iEaN kT INTEP-I aft • • MC.N yr w 1 cooler \` woKW ri t p,>A.IGRi tl 5..l4H /roT wAst1 C HotMLIJT L— -I� ❑IF_ -Ie=1 ehl<E r_Y / Cisp Er< ICE. c r en ' Lii r r" I 1 t0 OIr O A 1)I l.. „fill IIJI_I 11 _Int 1.111°o00005%- O�i°1n.I_Io u t OTIII'LII(11,(�_ A Iv FOR.JJ ITUr E / EgUtT'I"IEtJT ?LA/4 - MAW LEVG-L (&) SEAT, -` /4- I o - o Pert To PELovJ t</ CDN AI McIJTL, Meet• vlr11r1ca 24 5EM+ of 1J 7D peLow MLEvE-L FUR- w'To E 'DL&(z4) 5Ear6 %43' ti 0° • &WVIvcaarsvlxcw.e REVISIONS PRINTED W Jtyl imwsssimnat ons a-n w-sIns — %AIM ' irccl The Design Department Inc 119 North Fourth Street Suite 204 Minneapol s MN 55401 612 3751643 MEMORANDUM • TO Joint Comprehensive Plan Task Force Members FR Steve Russell, Community Development Director DA January 6, 1995 RE UPDATED GUIDEPOST DOCUMENT Attached is a revised guidepost document The planning commission will tentatively meet on January 23, 1995, to discuss the comp plan and receive the township report if it is ready • • • • RESULTS FROM STILLWATER/STILLWATER TOWNSHIP JOINT TASK FORCE MEETINGS Guideposts for Joint Planning The following policies and principles were discussed and considered by the joint task force as planning guideposts for cooperation between the city and township The guideposts are the result of six -months of meetings and discussion and reflects a consensus of direction, although neither the City of Stillwater nor Stillwater Township have officially endorse the statements Overall Planning Determine the desired growth rate and phasing of urban services to accommodate planned for growth as needed for the urban -rural transition planning area (URTPA) for the 25-year planning period 1995 - 2020 NOTE The urban -rural transition planning area (URTPA) is the area west of Stillwater currently in Stillwater Township bordered by Dellwood Road (TH 96), on the north, Manning Avenue (CR 15) on the west and Highway 36 on the south This area represents the ultimate future planning area for the City of Stillwater Skeleton Framework New development will respect the environmental framework of the plan This framework includes wetlands, woodlands, windbreaks and sloped areas Natural drainage systems shall be used in new development areas to promote the recharge of water tables and to reduce the speed and amount of run off Views from major public roads of new development in the URTPA shall be screened by existing vegetation and land forms, new landscaping, wetlands and greenways Major public roads include Dellwood Road, Manning Avenue, McKusick Road, Boutwell Avenue and Highway 36 Any new non-residential development shall be buffered from all adjacent residential uses, connected by trails to residential areas and appear visually subdued in a landscaped setting as viewed from public roads Design new subdivisions to minimize through traffic and when necessary design neighborhood collector streets with greater setbacks, landscaping and pedestrian and bike trails Create new neighborhoods in city growth areas that retain elements of Stillwater's small town 1 • • identity, appearance and character Develop special design guidelines and performance standards using the planned unit development process to implement visual screening, park, open space and trailway and natural resource policies Available Areas for Development There are approximately 500 acres of vacant land in the URTPA to be developed at either township and city densities Preserve historic resources and unique land forms in growth area to maintain elements of the areas past and provide and identity to new development Park, Recreation, Open Space Development Develop an overall trail system for the URTPA areas that connects new residential development areas to existing and proposed trials on McKusick Road, Myrtle Street and County Road 5 and connects all residential areas in the URTPA from Dellwood Road to 62nd Street New residential development areas should include desirable design elements from existing city neighborhoods including a mix of housing types, landscaped streets, accessible neighborhood parks and open space areas and a unique neighborhood images Require new development to provide 10 percent of the development residential land area or its equivalent for neighborhood (7 percent) and community parks (3 percent) City/Township Land Use Try to locate within the planning area an elementary school site, 10 acres, and community park, 25 acres (Good planning in either case ) Require a detailed environmental assessment of physical site conditions including plant and animal communities, topography, soil, drainage and wetlands before land development planning begins Density Use new development concepts, where appropriate, such as mixed use development and cluster housing, to provide life cycle housing opportunities, minimize the need for and use of the automobile and maintain open space Use ghost platting and cluster development to allow some initial growth with the opportunity for • • • urban density development in the future when desired and planned Establish lot size and other development standards for the URTPA areas in the township that accommodate future urban development according to the Stillwater comprehensive plan If new residential development areas are developed at city densities, design elements from existing city neighborhoods including a mix of housing types landscaped streets, accessible neighborhood parks and open space areas and unique neighborhood images Coordination and Implementation Structure Establish Joint Planning Board to coordinate planning between the City of Stillwater and Stillwater Township so both city and township plans for the URTPA are consistent Use orderly annexation agreements , joint power agreements and municipal urban service area extension agreements to coordinate and implement comprehensive plan growth phasing policy Elements of these agreements may include - Defining a rural taxing distnct so existing residents will be protected from unreasonable taxes - No adverse economic affects to existing township residents by MUSA extension into the URTPA for urban development - Establish 5-year planning periods for overall growth phasing - Any implementation of Comp Plan for the URTPA shall have input from the township and city Key Planning Concepts for URTPA The following key planning concepts provide direction for the preparation of the comprehensive plan The concepts will be a part of the comprehensive plan for the city and township and shall be used to guide special area planning Greenways/Open Space Definition Greenways shall be established along Manning Ave, Dellwood Blvd, Myrtle Street, McKusick Road and Boutwell Drive The greenways shall be 100 - 200 feet in width depending on the location and site conditions The purpose of the greenway is primarily to preserve the natural semi -rural character of the transition area by screening new development from major public roads The greenway shall appear informal and natural using native indigenous plant material adapted to existing topographic conditions Enhancement of existing topographic or vegetative i • i conditions is encouraged to the extent the enhancement appears natural Wetland mitigation sites may be used as part of the greenway Pathways may be located along side or in the greenway but not appear as a primary design element of the greenway The green way will provide a landscape separation between newly developing residential areas and high volume traffic corridors Trailways, Parks and Open Space Areas Trailways, neighborhood and community park and open space areas will be provided throughout the URTPA The extensive Brown's Creek Wetland systems shall provide the framework for park and open space resources preservation in the north portion of the transition area Long Lake and existing woodlands and windbreaks shall be used in the southern portion of the site for trail locations An overall system of trails connecting new neighborhoods from Dellwood Blvd to 62nd Streets shall be planned along wetlands, new natural drainage ways and wooded areas Within neighborhoods pathways shall conveniently connect residents to neighborhood park and open space areas separated from auto traffic Any active community park, convenience commercial use or school site shall be clearly connected to surrounding residential areas by walkways and bike path, utilize and preserve natural areas for trail locations Development Pattern and Density The overall character of the transition areas shall be single family with selected locations of compact clustered attached housing The existing semi -rural character of the areas north of McKusick Road (Random Creek) and south of Boutwell (Spring Creek) shall remain with some in fill at rural densities Newly developed areas shall be large lot ( 1 to 1 5 dwelling units per acres DU/Acre), small lot (2 to 3 DU/Acre) or higher density attached housing—al-4 - 6 DU/Acre Large, lot single family areas are located in areas of sensitive sites Because of topography wetlands, lakes or timberland conditions the amount of site disruption is limited These areas tend to be located on steeply sloped or wooded shorelands or adjacent to sensitive wetlands or open space areas A cluster development concept could work in this area to minimize the impact on the land Small, lot single family areas tend to be in areas that are less environmentally sensitive These sites can be interior to the large lot area or setback form open space areas These sites are the flatter corn or hay fields of the URTPA The development density of the small lot area is typical of the existing city Attached or compact housing areas are located in pockets separated visually and physically from single family areas These locations have good direct access to major roads and are more closely tied to existing urbanized areas Sites for compact housing area located on County Road 5, 62nd near 15 Myrtle Street south and west of Long Lake, possibly McKusick Road (west of • • • mitigation site) and pockets south of Dellwood Blvd Convenience Commercial Locations The purpose of this use is to provide services and products for the surrounding residential areas to reduce auto use The sites should be clearly connected by pathways to adjacent residential areas, be of a residential scale and style compatible with the adjacent residential areas Office park or research and development areas These locations provide a job base for the surrounding residential areas and tax base for the community These sites should have convenient access to major roads, be visually and physically separated from residential areas, be attractively designed and landscaped to fit into the site conditions The plan will respect current uses as they relate to assessment policy and any required land use changes ALTERNATIVE "F" • Acres DU Land Use Residential Single Family Large Lot (1 0 - 1 5 DU/Acre) 98 100-150 Small Lot (2 0 - 3 0 DU/Acre) 265 530-795 Compact (4 0 - 6 0 DU/Acre) 125 500-750 Totals 488 1,130-1,695 • C \WPWIN60\WPDOCS\RESULTS SR • • • cXekileAlkeY ICE CREAM City of Stillwater Planning Commission/City Council 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Commission and Council, My name is Todd Pellizzer Recently, my two brothers and I purchased the Winona Knits building located at 215 Main Street We have been informed that we will need a special use permit to operate a retail store there With this letter we would like to request such a permit for that location Sebastian Joe s Ice Cream is a family owned and operated business We make all of our own ice cream in small batches and have been fortunate to win numerous awards Our menu would -consist of ice cream, coffees and baked goods such as muffins, scones and cookies Currently, the two stores we now have are neighborhood meeting places where young and old can share an ice cream cone and a cup of coffee or cookie We feel that we will become an asset to the existing retail mix currently in downtown Stillwater We are noted for being active and concerned members of our business communities Our busiest time of year would of course be summer We would hope to establish and draw our customers from the existing Stillwater residents and tourists Because of this we don t feel we would adversely affect existing traffic patterns or parking allocations There are no parking spots available other than the parking lot on Water street We appreciate your consideration of a special use permit for us and look forward to a mutually beneficial relationship in the future Sincerely, Todd Pellizzer Sebastian Joe s Ice Cream 4301 Nicollet Avenue South • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 824-3461 4301 NICOLLET AVE S , • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55409 • PHONE 824-3461 J i 4 C r �- 1 -6-a riti 1 u s - -)2•14 vM %w.�.n ti • R/'M •.•••.. • 1•i •. Nor. ... W..x..._...-. N� 1�I ..__.. .1 yr....� y'4.-N w ,• N 1n a I • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW Case No SUP/DR/95-3 Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995 Project Location 215 South Main Street Zoning District CBD, Central Business District Applicant's Name Todd Pellizzer Type of Application Special use permit Project Description The sign plan for an existing structure at 215 South Main Street and a special use permit for an ice cream parlor/restaurant Design Review/Signage The Heiitage Preservation Commission reviewed the proposal at their regular meeting on Wednesday, January 4, 1995 They approved the projecting sign for the Main Street face along with a wall sign for the Water Street face similar to the existing Winona Knits sign The signs will be black and gold None of the transom area window signage will be included Special Use Permit The approximate square footage of the proposed use is 2600 square feet This includes the main level and mezzanine The building inspector will need to review the use of this level as it relates to the building codes The parking demand for the restaurant use is 21 spaces Parking is limited in the immediate area of the downtown and the public lots It cannot accommodate all the demand for parking In the future, if additional parking lots are constructed in the downtown, property owners will need to assist the city in providing these facilities Findings The proposal meets the intent of the downtown Design Guidelines, Sign Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All employees shall park in public permit parking lots Attachments Application Plans Lettei Photos PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Appeal Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Permit Planned Unit Development Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment Other Engineering Review Fee Total Fee Case No 60//9 Date /d' ? Fee Paid le 6e- FEE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION Environmental Review EAW EIS No Special Environmental Assessment Required The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection •with anv application Address of Project c,7/5 /1d//✓ er Assessor's Parcel No /t6f2 — 230 0 Zonj...nz District Description of Project 4'/'%Oe0E (.- c7��� C" CJ _A et C E u `► ? //iir .^7 ,,,_,A" F ri= c�c, se-c.) v'£ • I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner <4' 6" frj '" " "`G�c rt' £ Mailing Address 4'3C/ /‘./( c 7- ac-/ /V/0/.s, /-9 - SS` 7 Telephone No & /2 - e5.24 - 3'/E / Signature /' c-f—A-47/ � to the best of my r/�ii'" Representative /�= �v" ZZf Mailing Address #v30/ Ai' /£7 UJ �`-) �,b 6 / j1 53-110 Telephone No�(�/.2 �5���'' �6 / Signatures / �-,����`YY' Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action Lot Size (dimensions)) '2' x /20 s ft Total Land Area r/�i �/9t' Hight of Buildings Stori��e/ss Feet Principal :2 %4 Accessory A_)""1"L l36, Total Floor Area ,37sq ft Proposed floor area 2.31(c sq ft Building Coverage 237( sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces Date of Public Hearing is metal BRINES 0 i00 lig erd,Sk " -4 4.01 , • e = 200 1" = 200' 400 600 DA -IF OF PHOTOGRAPHY APRI1 1991 800 f* f„. 4 1,"4.'74,41#442, • "4"41:2,.. " • ' ,`,",',.****..**,,,r-tt5,-* TX"-r*,04011,44 5.,A;r4 s 4 WASHING ON CO6NTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE MINNESOTA OUTLOT C 300 100 /00 2 51 298.09 :7* f""*","*"-• 41'4' • 4:- , JO 5 503 r 404,-= • ‘,!"1,*-t OUTLOT v!, RECTIFICATION BASED ON - TARGETED CONTROL POINTS 0 PAUL E. WELLEN & ASSOCIATES, z 0 'ON 2SNZOI7 0') CD 0 CD CD W Nglil H CI 0 H L) h..) H. to CO hl hi(TlhiMPI 2t Z § § § § -61 Z N.) 43 M W 0 0 1-3 0 8 .('-1 il En NJ tn 1 d 0 in it r4 M H tcl . '71 oq )V Nj Cj (1 0 • CD W H 65 65 PP Pq d G7 EA Iv hi OC 01 LW C) gp H r4 'n 8 1 hi 0 10 st,NEChi < N) 0 En ' " t1 ''.). E fin VD 4-3 0 8 c. xi cc En /4 trj zjs < 1-1 0 4-3 en H tKI Pci Z c-4 to cn64-3 )..c) 5 (-) 0 0 H H Z H H 0 F3 I?) 2 F3 1C (/) 0 Hi btijj iCjdZ H Wt11011010 in 0 Ht0o- rn Z 70. 0 0 r3 h3 C) m) hl 1-3 uo g tg CD Z H C) • 0 hi " 5 01 0-4 R 8 ta H H 0 ›, 1-3 Z'-<tiCI (") ' 11 0 r. 0. - 01 rr 0 xi 0 0, 1J 13 0 0( 6' rt (t) c) 0 en m et rt rr 0' PI 0 (D 0 0 r. a 01 12' ) , rn t.c1 01'• .4 0 0, co 0' rt 1-• 2 m m z 0 h 0 co rt lel PI- 3. KD th m c n m a H. M rt 10 ID h 0 M '1(3. M 0 to n ro• hom o n m t h a m H. M "4 0 O. ho r- F" 0 1•5 g g 8 0 ID H tt. 0 0 5. 1- g PJ ) 17.• 0 4 7 0 0 I-• m 0 NJ 00161 M 0 Lc et rt 0 0 D. 0' M (0 Z 0 CL ri 4 m o m 0 m 7 - NJ P 74 F. 0.1 tS 4 0 0 7 ID 4 Cm sl 0 0 0% M rt 0 P 7 • 1-" (0 3. 0 to 0 (-'0 ts) P. 0 M t• H (l) 10 01'' (11 lu 0. 0 tr C (t pua qsaa t•-• It) to 0 hi 7' 0 P1 ft. (-1,11. 1-• O. 11) 0 e0 0 (1) z et 0 0 h rt () ••••••••••••0...".... 0J CJ NJ Ln un NJ 0 0...) N.) 1-4 C...) 4n. to) Ul £ 0 (010, 01 (0(10 0 10 31 F1 0 htt Cn L-1 0 o CD 0 cn 1-3 0 • (.: .' f_1::,,,--;. ' 1 ' 2 ',... . „ 7 1 / •-"-7-‘9,--;•:- , (:.:3-', ( to Z o rt rt n o c e o- c. n m c 0 o et 0 rt 7 a (00. 7 rr n 1••• CL W 11 P 0 C t. I-, Pr, Z M 13 4 LO hA I 0 01 m:re. thZ U5 0 00000 0 M et (10 hh M 0 51 ft LI LA 115 M rt - 03 7 •-1 05 I ID 7 I-- up LJ X 1.-. E Ri 0 0 t, . a fll O. 1-• C 4 01-4 0 41M 0. I-D". Z o eu I- i-, M 4 7 .< is, h ID ('1 01 M 0 H M h ID fD 6 0 rd o (0(0 o--cAt..., rt 0 n .a. 0' 1-, et h. X" 1,5 7 Ai Af htf 0 5-1 1.-, 0 X CD 0 0 tl -.1 hi P. I-. 9 LA 0 0 0 "R. 2 5' 13 !: 0 A'ID P C 0 c 5. .8 m .... 0 M 0 F" M . l U; Mr a10 ih 00 ;t9Z7 oo: 0 C 6 05 5.1 AI er .•4 7 tri rj ZSP 4s rt 0 rt 0 re 61 •••• 21 M to M 0 ID 4 0 n 0 0 0 fl 0 0 In O. (1(61 14 4 P. X M 0 rt ri• M X I-, M TaTTeJed qaa; rt 3. 21 rt 21 a 61 0. ID 51 5.1 61 CA 0 11) 01 H. a 4-• rt. va t. n 0 m N 0 ft M. ID 11 0. 0 0 X o- M H fD (00.0. salnuTw 0 0 61 o. 0 ro 0 10 3. 00—ES9 auTI ID ID 4aa; ET-ZSZ auTT 4sam ID z m 0 n n m m r• W V 0. 0 it 0 h r• hi 0' rt Ch rt I M 0 o i-t, m 1< ;TPH 4saM 0 LA 0. m ('1 51 3E n m Nri 0 7 H 0 H. 61 7 MU' ; Lj: •Or'CL' 0(00(00101 '1.010 7 rt. rt a m o 0100 m M P. E o 0.0110601 o 7 4 o - 10 C 7 0 Ul CA 0 M Ul 51 11 C rt 0 0 9 fD It 7 M IA ID O. 0 KD n tr o m m n rr el ID (0 h 4 0 61 et o 0161 H. CL n 0 c ID :3 a (0 t' 0 z et 21 ID 4sam144nos et 0 ;o aouaqsTp P 7 Ll 61 M W n 0 m c z h, 0 m m • 0 0 )0 51 IA CD X 1 C (0(00-1(00101 ID 0-1-1 11 h, rt F- M M CL IDD ID M M M rr Z 0 C) 0 MOtu hh n r. 0210' M rt) 2110 Co 0. Z •.0 0 rt 0, Pi 01 CL et M M 7 0 4 eh rr to h 0 CD 0 M C rD 0) 0 w 0 CL h- 7 ID htt Lc, IA 10 0 .. h o r. m n qsaatnnos ato, ;o Ja4aen0 Ln o rn cn 0 qsamqqnos atp 'EE uo74,DaS L.) Z w £ • LA 0 X E D 1- m 0, H. 0 AD H. 0 0 11 01 21 (0061 (I en 0 10 rr -elosauuTw 0) 0 1-3 Orj cn 0 ;IPH qsaa atp KD rt 01 ID (11 (10 01 00 0 c 61 lsam aql Jo JTE-1 4sP3 a41 lseaqqnos agq 0 0' 11 0 rt ID 0 0 ID lc) 31 61 61 H 0 H En Pi H 1-3 0 0 Z Z 1-30 1-3 Cn 1-3 11J HL-4 Z H 0 (z) Z 0 1-11 1-< H En tj 0 0 Z pj v) g: I :1 I in" I >101 r- lz I min (ow CO' 14*' bo 0 (-) H tri cn 7J F-3 Grailip I aNI SSIM H tKi zZtll 0 H H C) H Z )>. '-11 1-3 0-1 `..1) :IJ :11 H Z 0 1-4 H 0 P00. C-4 1-3 0 H ZIi ZH 0 0 4.". ti 0 0 (11 C-1 1-3 Cn 0 (/) H t RO 0 En tri cn m 1 0) ,9•17.66' N 1 Co i 0 cn N 01°13' 58" W WEST UNE OF THE E1/2 W1/2 SE1/4 SW1/4 S 01°14' 11" E 451.00 WEST LINE OF THE NORTH 300.00 FEET ............... OF THE SOUTH 350.00 FEET W1/2 E1/2 SE1 /2 SW1/4 chi 0 0 1 L 01 N 01°14'17" W DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS 'OS 90L'6Et 0 0 0 fn r3 1 'OS IOO'OL 1-3 0 0 0 H CD 01 4, VD I-, 03 N "el:\ 35 O. 0 0 '9 C, 451.00 0 ................ ........ H 0 c0O0000000O0O0O00000O0 4-3HHHHHHHHHH1-34-31-31-3•-31-31-30-30-30-31-3 LO LO Lo hi IV N5 hi hi hi hi hi NJ I-, t, t, CA Ln ho 1-3 r, c7 VD CO .4 ch tri 4, LO hJ t, C) CO LO hi t, I I 1 i I h, 1-4 0 1-1 ch sIou aasoamia ao 'ia 'OS SOL'69E Ch I-, hi t, t, 01 03 tn NJ CD 4 VD CD Ln 01 VD -A CN Ln VD .4 CD .4 CA Lo Lo (e hi CD L.) 13. VD 01 CD CO QD .0. tn oo ho co to 1-' ch ch c) cD (0 En u) m u) u) m m un m En u) u) 0 40 10 /0 10 10 10 10 10 +0 10 10 • 6 • • • • • • • • • • '11 111 el el 111 hd el hi hi hq hi hi 1-3 1-3 '-30-30-30-30-30-3 1-' 1-' Ln CA CA Ln CO CD tn tn 03 s . CO CD Li LO Ch -A Q0 VO CA CD ,3. ,4 CD 00 to tri co Q0 tn c) h) -.4 to 1-' co c) ho co (0 Lo En Ui Di In 01 Di Ui Ln En En 10 10 10 tO i0 10 10 io • • • • • • • • • • hl hl hi h5) h] 1-1 •-3 1-3 H H 1-3 H 1-3 1-3 1-3 0. • • • • • • • • • • 10 • • • • 6 tl C' 133A NI 31VOS 0 I I 0 11 m m I- s•• •-- I ....4 I 1 1 I .... : -. ....! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ _i _ _____I _ _i _ .1.. _ L g ...... _ WEST LINE .............. EAST 1/2 WEST 1/2 to 4. S 01°13' 48" r . .0 SECTION 33, T3ON, R2OW toe* 0 909.28 TOP GAST 93;4 903.69 11-64ERT 1°14' 07" E I (cg I I CD 100.94 : o 4- CD 52,90 -T1 X IN) c,3 col - Z 0 (.4 rri r-- C rul 1. Cn0 m I (11 a) co G4 4" 0 cn 130.02 130.02 S y6T JF Nr3E cor UNE •••• ••••• 123.02 1. •••••1171, 1-'1 1-1 17. i...1 1 I Ot".4 1 1 1 I ONE.. 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I__I _ _ ____L ____L_---- TUENGE DRIVE ........ ............................... (bOCUMENT NUMBER 69a73 128.85 30 30 128.96 0) - 12104_ g b 143. 0 129.44 (D 0 C 58.00 EAST LINE OF THE 719.94. WEST 1/2 EAST 1/2 4, SOUTHEAST 1/4 SOUTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 33, T3ON, R2OW 44 73 1) 116e 0 z • tzi A 619.96 S 01°14' 00" E 116.15 11 11 II 11 Lo 0 0 • c7 ..!„ Co co .17 cn - on (LL17969 2:13GIVN 99.00 0 70 ISV3HICIOS 3Nfl 3mHinos 169.01 ...................................... 3 ,,Lg lgo613 N 111IS AO A110 041 01 094-210