HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-09 CPC Packet•
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
NOTICE OF MEETING
The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, January 9, 1995, at 7 p m in the
Council Chambers of City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street
Approval of Minutes of December 12, 1994
AGENDA
1 Case No ZAM/94-64 A zoning ordinance map amendment to rezone a 7 5 acre parcel
of property from RA, Single Family Residential to RB, Two Family Residential The
property is located east of County road 5 and Croixwood Blvd John E Roettger,
applicant
2 Case No SUB/94-63 A major subdivision of a 7 5 acres parcel into 10-duplex lots
ranging in size from 10,800 sq ft to 18,900 sq ft The property is located east of County
Road 5 and Croixwood Blvd in the RA, Single Family Residential District John
Roettger, applicant
3 Case No ZAT /95-7 A zoning ordinance text amendment revising the sign ordinance by
reducing the allowed size and height of signs in business park districts City of
Stillwater, applicant
4 Case No PUD/95-8 A planned unit development permit for office business use with
parking located at corner the of South 3rd Street and Pine Street in the PA, Public
Administrative Office District CUB Food and City of Stillwater, applicants
5 Case SUP/94-6 Review of landscape plan for Good Samaritan Center, at 1119 Owens
Street North, Charles Huymk, applicant
6 Case No SUP/94-65 A special use permit to conduct an automotive repair business on
Lot 3, Block 3, Outlot C of the Stillwater Market Place The property is located west of
Market Drive between Orleans Avenue and Curve Crest Blvd in the BP-C Business
Park -Office District Robert A Frey, applicant
7 Case No ZAM/95-4 A zoning ordinance map amendment rezoning the 10 47 acre CUB
grocery store site at 2001 Washington Avenue from business park commercial, BP-C, to
Business park industrial, BP -I, Andersen Windows, applicant
8 Case No SUP/DR/95-5 A special use permit and design review for a light industrial,
office, warehouse facility at 2001 Washington Avenue in the Business park commercial
BP-C District, Andersen Windows, applicant
9 Case No SUP/95-1 A special use permit to allow a home occupation beauty shop in a
single family residence at 515 6th Street South in the Duplex residential R-B district
William Wahlberg, applicant
10 Case No SUP/95- 6 A special Use Permit for a 3-guest room Bed and Breakfast in a
single family residence at 704 1st Street South in the duplex residential RB district, John
and Eloise Anton, applicants
11 Case No SUB/V/95-2 A preliminary plat approval and variances to the front yard
setback requirements for a major subdivision of a 7 2 acre parcel of property into 36 lots
with one outlot ranging in size from 5,386 sq ft to 66,625 sq ft for construction of
twinhomes with zero lot line setbacks The property is located on the south east corner of
Shelton Drive and Tuenge Drive in the RB, Two -Family Residential District Schafer
Development, applicant
12 Case No SUP/DR/95-3 A special use permit with design review for an ice cream
parlor/restaurant, located at 215 South Main Street in the Central Business District, CBC,
Zone District, Todd Pelhzzer, applicant
o
F Ilk
•
•
•
PLANNING COMMISSION
Dec 12, 1994
Present Jerry Fontaine, chairman
Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott, Rob Hamlin,
Kirk Roetman, and Don Valsvik
Absent Dorothy Foster, Jay Kimble and Darwin Wald
Others Steve Russell, community development director, Ann
Terwedo, planning
Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m
Mayor Hooley appeared before the Commission and thanked members for
their support and for the gift
Case No. SUP/94-64. A special use permit to conduct an office use out of a
residential structure at 102 S Sherburne in the RB, Two Family
Residential District Ted Harms, applicant
Mr Harms appeared on his own behalf He said he owns a company which
produces educational materials and wants to relocate from the west coast
to an office here He said the business does not have any customer traffic
and would not create any traffic congestion He said he understood the
area was zoned residential, but said he thought the business would be a
credit to the neighborhood
Ted Gillen, 1011 W Myrtle St , said he thought operating an office out of a
residence would be OK only if there were no other commercial places
available He said he would prefer the house to remain residential and said
an office use would not do any good to the neighboring properties
Herb Kaplan, 106 S Sherburne, said a house/office would be acceptable,
but said he and his wife would object if the existing residence were to be
used only for commercial/office use
Mr Harms said the house would not be changed in any way There would be
no sign, he said, and no on -street parking The most traffic the business
would generate would be UPS deliveries, he said He had the opportunity to
purchase the house and it looked like it could have met his needs He also
said he would be happy to supply neighbors with character references
Mr Hamlin said he supports cottage -type industry But he ;aid this
proposal sounds like it should be located in an area zoned for business and
said he did not see any hardship in finding another location for the
business Mr Roetman agreed that the proposal was not consistent with
the neighborhood He also suggested that granting a special use permit and
not rezoning would be doing an injustice to other businesses paying
commercial property taxes
Duane Elliott, seconded by Don Valsvik, moved to deny the request, all in
favor Mr Fontaine reminded Mr Harms that he did have the option of
appealing the denial within 10 days
Case No SUP/94-65 The case was continued
Case No V/94-66 A variance to the front yard setback requirement (30
feet required, 4 5 feet requested) for a porch and second floor addition at
1656 S Greeley St in the RA, Single Family Residential District Richard
Ritzer, applicant
Mr Ritzer appeared on his own behalf He said there was some
misunderstanding regarding the setback requirements He said he was told
it was 20 feet, not 30, and he was requesting 6 6 feet, rather than 4
There was discussion about the zoning in_ the area and variance previously
issued to the Ritzers for construction of a large garage/storage building
The garage was connected to the residence, which was not part of the
variance initially approved
Staff had recommended denial of the request Mr Russell referred to the
issue of fire protection in having the buildings connected and said there
was a way of accomplishing the requested addition by keeping the
buildings separate
Mr Hamlin moved approval with the condition that a fire barrier, approved
by the fire department, be installed Mr Valsvik suggested adding the
condition that the existing structures be brought up to code Mr Hamlin
accepted the amendment to his motion, Mr Valsvik seconded the motion
Vote was 5-1, with Mr Elliott voting no
Mr Elliott expressed his frustration with trying to correct something that
wasn't done properly after the original variance was granted Mr Valsvik
agreed that there should be some follow-up when variances are granted to
•
•
•
make sure the conditions of approval are followed, he wondered if that
was the Planning Commission's or city staff's responsibility
Mr Valsvik suggested that Mr Russell prepare some possible
recommendations regarding follow-up on variances/conditions of approval
for consideration at the next meeting
Case No SUP/V/94-67 A special use permit to conduct a take-out
business at 210 N Main St in the CBD, Central Business District, with a
variance to the sign ordinance for construction of a 6-foot tall free-
standing sign, three feet from the front property line (15 feet required)
Mohanmmand-Ali-Salehi-Mischei, applicant
Don Broman appeared representing the applicant Gary Bressler, project
architect, also was present
Ann Terwedo told the commission one issue that wasn't resolved in the
Heritage Preservation Commission review was that of the sign material
Mr Broman said the applicant would like to take the traditional Domino's
sign and encase it in wood
Jay Michels, a member of the Heritage Preservation Commission, said that
group would prefer to have a wood sign, but the issue was left up in the
air, depending on what Domino's would or would not allow regarding
signage Mr Michels, who lives at 118 1/2 N Main St , later expressed his
concern regarding curb cuts and planned parking He said curb cuts as
planned would not large enough for parking and drive -through traffic He
suggested that traffic flow might be directed to Commercial/Second
Street
Mr Broman said the developers think the traffic flow should come off Main
Street He also said MnDOT had been contacted regarding curb cuts and a
30 foot curb cut is preferred But he said it is an issue the applicant
would be willing to take a look at
Mr Roetman noted that traffic coming off Main would be the same
situation as currently exists with the Fina station
Mr Fontaine said he would be reluctant to approve the request if using a
plastic sign in a wooden frame was not acceptable to the Heritage
Preservation Commission Roger Tomten, an HPC member, said according
to the Downtown design guidelines, the sign should be of metal or wood
Mr Tomten also noted that corporations are beginning to recognize the
value of historic districts in allowing exceptions to corporate policies,
such as signage standards
Mr Valsvik made a motion to add a condition that there be right hand
traffic only off Main, exiting on Commercial, Mr Roetman seconded the
motion Mr Elliott suggested that traffic engineers review the situation
instead of the Planning Commission determining the traffic flow issue
The original motion was amended to have traffic engineers review the
situation
Staff condition of approval No 8 was amended to require that the final
sign/lighting plan go back to the Heritage Preservation Commission for its
review and that staff review the external lighting plan
Mr Elliott, seconded by Mr Roetman, moved approval with the
amended/added conditions All in favor
Comp plan update
Hans Hagen gave a presentation regarding development plans for the
Staloch farm Large -lot single-family homes are proposed adjacent to
Long Lake, small -lot, single-family homes would be located west off the
main road All existing trees would be saved, and the northeast portion of
the area would be left as open space
There are about 76 acres in the proposed development, 10 acres of park
Seventy-nine large -lot homes are proposed, with 85 small -lot homes,
resulting in a density of about 2 2 units per acre
Mr Hagen also gave a brief presentation about a commercial area like
Season's Market which could be located somewhere in the URTPA He said
it it possible to have a shopping center in a residential development with
the proper design, he is not proposing one on his site
Marc Putnam, representing the Charles Cudd Co , gave a presentation
regarding a proposal for the Kroening property, 180 acres north of the
Staloch property The design proposal includes a large village green
connected with a number of smaller greens A school/commercial
alternative is built into the plan The proposed lot sizes may change
depending on the market, he said The current proposal has about 220
homes on the 180 acres, he said
A member of the audience asked why a one unit per 2 1/2 acre density
0
0
•
•
•
wouldn't work Mr Russell asked whether the concept of cluster housing
had been considered Mr Putnam said it won't work because it is
inefficient and the cost will drive producers elsewhere Mr Hagen agreed
that competition drives what developers can do
Larry Frank appeared representing Arcon Land Development Co Arcon does
not build homes, it develops lots with utilities/street and generally
markets the lots to individual builders Arcon is proposing to develop 131
acres of the Abramowitz property, between the Zephyr railroad tracks and
Boutwell Road A variety of housing is planned -- 133 single-family
homes, 87 small single-family lots and 29 townhouse units There would
be 42 acres of open space/wetlands, with one main entrance off Boutwell
Miles Lindberg outlined possible development plans for the Palmer
property, 173 acres located at Manning Avenue and Highway 96 The
proposal calls for the same three housing types as the Arcon proposal,
with 282 units on the 173 acres -- 2 1 units per acre There is a 6 5 acre
site for possible commercial development at the Manning/96 intersection
Other business
The Ward Network has asked for a written response to their
report/presentation Members were asked to get any comments to Mr
Russell for inclusion in the Commission's response There also was a brief
discussion regarding a letter members had received from Ward Network
representatives
Mr Hamlin, seconded by Mr Valsvik, moved to set a public hearing on the
sign ordinance and design guidelines for the West Industrial Park All in
favor
Glenna Bealka, seconded by Duane Elliott, moved approval of the minutes
of the special meeting of Nov 30, 1994
Mr Hamlin agreed to reappointment to another term on the Planning
Commission Mr Wald will be contacted regarding his interest in
reappointment
Don Valsvik, seconded by Duane Elliott, moved to adjourn the meeting at
1050 pm
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No ZAM/94-64
Planning Commission Date November 14, 1994
Project Location County Road 5 and Croixwood Boulevard
Zoning Distract R-A Single Family
Applicant's Name John Roettger
Type of Application Zoning Map Amendment
Project Description
The request is to rezone 7 25 acres of land from Single Family Residential R-A to Duplex
Residential R-B The site is located on the east side of County Road 5 across from the intersection
with Croixwood Boulevard (see attached location map)
Discussion
The proposal is to rezone the 7 25 acre property from R-A Single Family Residential to R-B Duplex
Residential The R-A zoning requires 10,000 square feet per dwelling unit, while the R-B zoning
requires 5,000 square feet per dwelling unit
The zoning in the area is Single Family, Multi -Family Residential (across County Road 5) and
General Commercial (Brooks/Kindercare) (see attached zoning map) Although zoned R-A, the
Cottages are built at a multi -family density The area to be rezoned is comprised of two lots One
lot currently contains a single family residence That lot contains 1 60 acres A second parcel
contains a total land area of 6 68 acres Of that land area, 3 68 acres of land is developable outside
of the wetlands area
A related proposal (case SUB/94-63) subdivides the two lots into 10 additional lots which could
contain 20 dwelling units
The proposed Duplex Residential zoning in consistent with the residential use to the south and west
of the site and its location next to County Road 5
Recommendation
Approx al
Attachments
Application and Map
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE Ft, ,M
rOCOVedi
(r3/3 191-/ T
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
IV Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No
Date
Fee Paid
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
•►th any application `� q��
Address of Project Assessor s Parcel No 0 96 3 Z - 3 C' a o q. 3
Zoning District Description of Project Gam s Au c-rib.J e r /O - -%•N /f�n�s
I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my
knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
Property Owner
Mailing Address A7 Z ICU fox .(
Si /kALes j /L1n1 .S"LH79
Telephone No
lit r" L� h �L,o rZ I 2 / 09'L
•
x
Signature
6.L /4-77 i-e._ N 6�
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten
Sc6 /477-A(--Ne,)
Lot Size (dimensions) x sq ft
Total Land Area 7 2.7 A4_,
Hight of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
{ - / Z 3
G-A y // E. Representative J G N-�. F
Gil 6 F
Go rev > Mailing Address y 3 9 Co s,-LRe l7( %R AIL
u
Si/wA1 �H,�bL oez 5; /Lk)*r„L /1,. �0OrG2-
�3 G/z Or? "9z' Telephone No 4/ 3 9 - /
Date of Public Hearing, is
gnature
calendar days othe date of the action
Total Floor Area :5G'L ' Li sq ft
Proposed floor area 20 u ni i_ sq ft 1 �`7((C 5 F
Building Coverage L u 0 sq ft V z
Paved Impervious Area if z7i_GOsq ft
Number of off street parking spaces 1/0
/%Zc s'
/3z46
• LOCATION MAP
,, ZAM/94-64 CR#5
St!Ilpar
•
• s
______Imemmi
0 300 600
ittai BAPTIST CHURCH
• 09032-3200
V707B Mg7ooS
i a eo
CONDO
/K
NO 61
COND
D4
2900
09032-3005
09032 - 3010
7v7
09032- 3015
01
e
9
2 s
OUTLOT C
27/12 T9
T I e % HY•y, ee
1Sa S3
S 3
CE
032— 3025
S89°; •
29
ti
Aefr
OUTLO
D
L/Lr L4R£ f[EMFVTARr
scHnoi. 3
M 0
09032-2445
o - N
Zrr� • `1
My(
2460
30
2800
N 88°56130"E
400 00
` -.
7 6s"J
At/
W
1—
7
NO "
■ 9 CJ PROICI
ST IC Co, YM.497
Mn o.IC Y AI.AGCYC
/ MICA
PO' 7£ /M/
}
i
NO 36
CROIXI000
c lo. s LL•
o �\
PARK f 2
STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO 36
ER_AO.EN .Rlv
14 I '
lLA
PUBIC
WORKS
STORAGE
AREA
•
fit
T
1 1 1
I Li_ I i.L
W
R A
3
► PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No PUD/SUB/94 63
Planning Commission Date November 14 1994
roject Location County Road 5 and Croixwood Boulevard
Zoning District R A Single Family Residential
Applicant s Name John Roettger
Type of Application Concept PUD/Subdivision Plan/Plat 10 lot
Project Description
The application is to subdivide 2 lots containing 7 25 acres into 10 lots (A rezoning request to rezone the property from Single Family
R A to Duplex Residential R B is being reviewed separately by the Planning Commission )
Discussion
The site is located east of County Road 5 A pond (wetland) is located next to County Road 5 on the site The site then slopes up toward
the east The site is covered with a variety of trees from Cottonwood to Oak trees The tree locations wetland and topography of the
site are shown on the site survey
The subdivision proposal shows 10 lots ranging in size from 18 900 square feet to 10 800 square feet Ten thousand square feet is the
minimum lot size requirement
The plan shows a 32 foot wide road accessway to the site from the north end off of County Road 5 Comments from Washington County
regarding road access are attached
Since the last review by the commission on November 14 1994 the developer has combined driveways and reduced the width of curb
cuts and relocated the access road out of the wetland The public works department requests that the maximum driveway width for a
combined driveway be 25 feet
It is recommended that the roadway width for the portion of road from County Rd 5 to the first driveway be reduced from 32 feet to 24
•feet to allow further setback from the wetland It is also recommended that the two units on the lot furthest north on the site be illuminated
or redesigned and combined with the second lot possibly in a triplex configuration The proposed structure on the entry lot does not meet
front or rear yard setback requirements and is located awkwardly on the site as would be viewed from County Rd 5
The first lot or a part of it may provide for the city park dedication requirements
Other project plan comments received from the Soil and Water Conservation District is that the detention pond should have an outlet at
its south end
The project requires a variance from the 50 foot roadway setback requirement from the wetland The plans show a sidewalk leading from
County Road 5 to Lily Lake School property The sidewalk and retaining walls should be constructed when the public improvements are
installed
The project design has attempted to deal with the wetland sloped condition of the lot and access limitations to County Road 5 The project
is consistent with the new Duplex Residential zoning of the site
Conditions of Approval
1 A sidewalk and retaining wall as shown on the plans shall be installed when public improvements are constructed
2 The first lot to the north of the site shall be illuminated or redesigned with the adjacent lot Subject to staff and council approval
3 Park dedication requirements shall be 7 percent of net developable land or as required by the Park and Rec Commission
4 The cul de sac street shall be 24 feet wide from the entry off of County Road 5 to the first driveway
5 All comments from Washington County Public Works shall be met
• 6 The pond shall have an outlet on its south end
7 A landscape plan shall be submitted showing one replacement tree for every two 6 or greater in diameter that are removed
Preferred replacement trees shall be oak
PLhANING ADMINISTRATIVE F...tM
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
l/ Other /7 i, t2,t(4,( 1 ( d
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No
Date
Fee Paid
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted m connection
.ith any application
/c
Address of Project J" �' Z
Zoning District �= 2
Description of Project
fL/4 r /"`A -Ai
Assessor s Parcel No G yG 52 - 3 - LG '
C Ai c- o OF /G _ /tJ,N //oM •s
I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my
knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
Property Owner / i r/ � z-/ a- OI Y
Mailing Address AT 2 P66,4 /
sa �4�f79
Telephone No S7
Glta.y /�o�v r Representative \)U /> nl o E7TG &
Cu AD yrT2 MailmgAddress 937t S.—c.2u/xp 1AJ
ST/ccw �i/h/' S��r� S% /LL4J.4 T bZ /L/is 550�:Z
2 - y /3 L, (v/Z 4/3y 6 yZO Telephone No 4}39- /Z} %S
Signature G E77. ATTkt_.N E , X Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days o the date of the action
Si 5 A%TA-C-f+CD
Lot Size (dimensions) x sq ft
Total Land Area 9 2. S ,-c,z 5 5
Hight of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Date of Public Hearing is
Total Floor Area ��c o tr0 sq ft
Proposed floor area z-c- uN r s sq ft
Building Coverage 366-4/0 sq ft
Paved Impervious Area 1/1/266 sq ft
Number of off street parking spaces 1-}-6
J5
APPEALS
BUILDING MOVING PERMITS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN
DESIGN PERMIT
i— GRADING PERMIT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ON -SITE SEWER PERMIT
I
1 1 SITE ALTERATION PERMIT
1 I
l '
VARIANCE
(-7 VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT
rx' ZONING AMENDMENT
I COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
I
OTHER
Record of Action on Application
Decision Authority
Date of Action
Decision by Authority
Appeals Period (date)
Appeal Filed (date)
Appeal Scheduled (date)
Appeal Decision Authority
Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date
Decision Complete (date)
•
s F
2 /6,6. Zq s,--
3 /Zz>)>G5;-
f l s
/347 5r
7 /2i s)=
/6 s/
? 6sF
•
/1,) 1-z.,' .S!9; cJ sft-h
/U�4J J •����`/Y /, G/6ySc-17 -
\h XZ'C
6vAj � ; 5 z cyL3
j�GG'sr
(�/�1L / 1- a,) /l2-5.4 -
•
(a)
0 S ci F,z 0
PA-0E-42 /1 EA
/z s:-
3 /Z '6
/Z",C`t 5�
/ 3 I/ 7 -5F
/,3 3 cs%-
3Csf
/a /6
4 E- s,vFtej<E1-It-
) 9206 c/ 6 oa
7Lr / / G��7GAri��SG/��� k)n'„nJ
v� 26( 5
ZG iS 2 3
0
��TkL j?AOFDA
1
3/9 71
s°
COT 1
11
W
'(v
\,
/ )mow
0 \ v
I1 /
\\, `i gig I 11
r 1 19 �n5 wc' saH"'
i Sjv G,,w°
ijW
/
1F1.0- P1-V)? Iry
S L A G E 1 /211' I00'3
CURD V/ 1IOW I7'orir PA,o,JECr
17 k1-Gg sr
125"
LoT
11 (93U5F
/2.6°
L br /0
0Uo
Gor4
/2G4'0sf
h,Rc.P
QiseI
Z
?/g
/000
N `t&lb 4IALL
qs°
L0T 5
/34P7ss�
/
Lar 6,
133665E
tie I (DO
9J24
7,,
80 d
/s
0
14)
9qo
20v
/ 2,5‘
0
y
z 4
i
•
•
MEMORANDUM
f0 Ste Russell Community Dexelopment Director
FROM Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
SUBJFCT Reviev. of Subdivision SUB/94-63 Located on County Road 5/Croixwood Blvd
DATF November 9 1994
1 hive reviewed the l O-lot subdivision and offer the following comments I o fully ex aluate the project
additional information should be submitted by the applicant
1'he plan shows a lot of hard surface that will result in runoff that will impact the
pond
Need more information to evaluate the effect of piping Lily Lake School drainage to
pond as well as de, elopment runoff
• The road could be moved further away from the wetland at the north end to save trees
and buffer wetlands This Mould result in loss of one lot
• Should use standard 42 5 foot cul de sac (this would result in probable loss of one lot
at south end)
• A runoff settling basin should be provided to catch sediment before it enters the pond
• A 24 toot roadway surface may be appropnate
• The sidewalk from 1 ily Lake School and school drainage improvements should be
coordinated with the school district
• Width of driveways may be able to be reduced to reduce hard surface and runoff
impact
In conclusion a stormy, ater drainage plan and revision to the road design should be considered further
before preliminary subdivision approval
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS • HIGHWAYS • FACILITIES
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH • STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 9573
612 430 4300 Facsimile Machine 612 430 4350
November 8 1994
Mr Steve Russell
City of Stillwater
216 N Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Donald C Wisniewsk' P E
Director Public Works/County Engineer
John P Perkovich Deputy Director
Operations Division
Donald J Theisen P E Deputy Director
Technical & Administrative Division
James D Hanson P E
Transportation Engineer
Edward Kepler
Facilities Operations Manager
John Roettger Subdivision Adjacent to Washington County State Aid Highway 5
(Stillwater Case No SUB/94-63)
Dear Mr Russell
We have reviewed the revised John Roettger subdivision and find it to be acceptable if the
following conditions are met
1 A Washington County Access Permit must be obtained for the connection to
CSAH 5 (Stillwater Blvd North)
2 A Washington County Utility Permit must be obtained for all work within County
right of way
3 Road plans, including cross sections, must be submitted to the County for approval
4 The connection of the access to CSAH 5 must be at a 90 degree angle
5 The developer must construct a right turn lane to serve the development This
must De constructed according to the specifications of the Minnesota Department
of Transportation and as follows The turn lane shall be 150 feet long by 14 feet
wide with a 15 1 taper at the south end The length of the turn lane may be
adjusted by the County based on the internal street design and traffic factors It
shall be constructed with a 6 thick Class 5 aggregate base a 2 Type 31
Bituminous base course, a 2 thick Type 31 Bituminous binder course, and a 2
thick Type 41 Bituminous wearing course Where necessary, the existing curb and
gutter must be removed and new B-624 curb and gutter installed to match the
existing curb
6 In conjunction with turn lane construction, the developer must modify the storm
sewer system to accommodate the width added to the roadway by the turn lane
and the stormwater added to the system by this development Any changes to the
wetland must be approved by the City of Stillwater Computations showing the
Pn fed o Recycled P p
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Page two
Letter to Steve Russell
November 8, 1994
runoff volumes must be submitted to Washington County and the Stillwater City
Engineer for approval prior to permit approval
7 All modifications to CSAH 5 must be completed prior to final paving of
S A P 82-605 10, the current construction project on CSAH 5 This work is
scheduled for late May, 1995
Washington County can construct the turn lane and storm sewer revisions as a
supplement to the contract for S A P 82-605 10, if it is acceptable to the contractor on
the job All costs associated with this work will be paid by the developer
Please advise us as soon as the City acts on this subdivision since it is essential to
coordinate turn lane construction with our construction project If you have questions or
comments, please call me at 430 4312
Sincerely,
Joseph Lux
cc John Roettger
Glenn Schreiner, SEH
Klayton Eckles, Stillwater City Engineer
Wally Abrahamson, Washington County Commissioner
Don Theisen, Washington County Public Works
Don Wisniewski, Washington County Public Works
\lux\roettger Itr
0
0
0
MEMORANDUM
•
TO Planning Commission
FR Steve Russell, Community Development Department
DA January 4, 1995
RE AMENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE FOR BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT
N
In November, the planning commission directed staff to review the sign ordinance for the
business park district due to the recent development of the Market Place project and concern for
signage along County Road 5
At the planning commission meeting of December 12, 1994, a draft sign ordinance with changes
was presented to the commission for comments The commission directed that no signage be
allowed from backs of buildings along County Road 5 Specific design guidelines for the Market
Place Planned Unit Development allow one sign per market place business (most likely located
on the front of the building) and the revised sign regulations (Section 12) limit signage on
County Road 5
These changes to the sign regulations will reduce new signage and bnng it into character with
signage allowed in the Market Place project and the business park generally
Recommendation
Recommend for approval to city council
Attachment
Draft ordinance
•
•
•
•
9 PERMI IED SIGNS DY A SIGN PERMIT IN
BUSINESS PARK DISTRICTS
All commercial, office and industrial signs in all Business Park (BP) Districts are
subject to the following requirements One (1) wall, freestanding,
awning or canopy sign per business tak'ee is permitted
subject to the following requirements
a Wall Signs
1 Area The gross surface area of a wall sign shall not exceed one
(1) square foot for each of building, parallel,
or substantially parallel, to the front lot hne
2 Location A wall sign shall be located on the outermost wall of
any principal building but shall not project more than sixteen (16)
inches from the wall to which the sign is to be affixed The
location and arrangement of all wall signs shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Community Development Director
3 Height A wall sign shall not project higher than the parapet hne
of the wall to which the sign is to be affixed or fifteen (1
feet as measured from the base of the building wall to which
the sign is affixed, whichever is lower
4 Special Conditions Where a principal building is devoted to two
(2) or more uses, the operator of each such use may install a wall
sign upon his/her proportionate share of the building wall to which
the sign is to be affixed A sign plan must be submitted for the
entire building containing the following information
a The total gross signage for the entire building shall not
exceed one (1) square foot for each teat of
such building face parallel, or substantially parallel, to a
street lot line or a minimum of twenty-five (25) square feet
per business
b The location, sizes, types, Color and elevation
drawings of all signs
c All signs shall be visually consistent in location,
proporation and scale
b Freestanding Signs
1 Area The gross surface area of afreellitianding sign shall
not exceed 3t2 square feet for each exposed face
2 Location A ground signShiblil be set back Et
tin INNER from front or side property line
3 Height A ground sign shall not project higher than six (6) feet, as
measured from base of sign or grade of the nearest adjacent
roadway, whichever is lower
4 One freestanding sign per
development site shall be allowed.
c Awning, Canopy
1 Area The gross surface area of an awning, canopy or marquee
sign shall not exceed thirty (3O) percent of the gross
surface area of the awning, canopy or marquee to which such sign
is to be affixed
2 Location A sign may be affixed to or located upon any awning,
canopy or marquee
3 Height An awning, canopy or marquee sign shall not project
higher than the top of the awning, canopy or marquee to which
such sign is to be affixed
d Multi -tenant Master Sign Program A building Master Sign Program
shall be required (for multi -tenant commercial buildings) besides the
individual tenant and occupant signs A building master identification
sign may be permitted according to the following requirements
1 Building master identification signs shall not contain the names of
any tenants or occupants of the center only the cenbagr
name
2 If the multi -tenant commercial building has a floor area of 40,000
square feet or less, the building may have a freestanding sign with
a maximum slarea of 40 square feet on each side
and s maximum with a maximum height of eight feet
3 If the multiple tenant commercial building has a floor area greater
than 40,000 square feet, but less than the 100,000 square feet, the
Wilding may have a master identification sign with a
•
•
•
a
•
maximum of square feet on each side and a
maximum height of CI NMI.
4 If the multiple tenant commercial building has a floor area of
greater than 100,000 square feet, the center may have a master
identification sign with a maximum area on 120 square feet on
each side and a maximum height of 113 #mot
5 No individual shop or business within a multiple tenant
commercial building shall have a freestanding sign
10 DIRECTORY SIGNS
Directory signs are used to guide pedestrians to individual business within a
multiple tenant commercial area and are permitted in Business Park (BP) Districts
subject to design review
1 Placement -
a must be placed on the site of the development
b shall be erected only in internal pedestnan access areas and not in
vehicle access areas
c directory sign area to be used for the purposes of direction and
identification only
2 Area -
A directory sign may have maximum area on one square foot for each
business listed on the sign and four square feet for the name of the
building or complex
3 Directory signs may be freestanding but shall not exceed six and one-half
feet in height
11 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION SIGNS
Automobile service stations are allowed one (1) wall sign and one (1) ground sign
subject to the following conditions
a Wall Signs There shall be no more than one (1) wall sign with a
maximum sign area of one (1) square foot for each two lineal feet of
building frontage
b Freestanding Signs There shall be no more than one (1) freestanding sign
for each principal building A freestanding sign shall be set back ft f
itS) from the front and side property line A freestanding sign shall not
project higher than eight 6) feet as measured from grade or
nearest curb height whichever is less or
contain more than G® square feet °feign oroa
c Service Bay and Island Identification Signs Service bay and island
identification signs are permitted providing direction or instruction to
persons using the facility but containing no advertising material of any
kind
12 SPECIAL SIGN HEIGHT SEM AND LCOATIONi LIMITS
a
Because of the character of the area, including existing and proposed land use
special sign regUietiOVIS for freestanding signs are required for certain
streets as follows
a Washington Avenue Crow' Tower to
Orleans t* Cures Crest Boulevard
from South Greeley to County Road 5 end
Orleans from Cures Crest Blvd. to County
Road 43 - Six (43) feet and 30 square toot
b County Road 5 from Highway 36 to Croixwood Boulevard and South
Greeley from Orleans to Highway 36 - eight (6) feet in
height and 60 square feet in area (no
sigage on rear of building toward County
Road 5).
H$ighy 343 Frontage Road from Oreeley
to Curve Crest Blvd. - 25 feet and SO
square feet.
13 NONCONFORMING USES
a Nonconforming signs that are lawful on the date of the adoption of this
ordinance shall have rights outlined in Chapter 31 01, Subd 9 of the
Zoning Ordinance with respect to their alteration, extension, restoration
and abandonment
b Any person violating or failing to comply with any provision of this
ordinance shall upon conviction thereof be guilty of a misdemeanor
14 VIOLATIONS
•
•
•
•
•
•
In all cases of violations of this ordinance which are unabated thirty (30) days
after written notice to record owner of the property on which the sign is located,
the City may proceed to abate and remove the violation and, if deemed necessary,
to have cost thereof specially assessed against the lot or parcel where the violation
was located
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No PUD/98
Planning Commission Date January 9 199�
Project Location 421 South Third Street/I06 East Pine Street
Zoning District Professional Admm District
Applicant s Name City of Stillwater/CUB Foods
Type of Application Planned Unit Development
Project Description
Planned unit development for 63 000 sq ft office building with 52 space parking lot and a 161 space public parking
lot
Discussion
The application is for a planned unit development application for a combined office building and city parking lot
The purpose of this permit is to review the parking requirements and provisions for the office use
The office use contains 63 254 square feet of floor area Fifty two (52) on site parking spaces are provided Based
on the zoning parking requirements 210 spaces are required The public parking lot located across Third Street and
a part of this application provides 161 parking spaces Total available off street parking on the two sites is 213
spaces The combined CUB/City site contains approximately 4 5 acres A 63 254 sq ft office building and 161
space parking lot currently occupy the site This PUD proposal would in no way change the use but condition the
availability of the public parking lot for office use during normal working hours At other times nights weekends
and holidays the public lot would be used by the non office public
By combining the parking lot use and the office building use parking availability can be conditioned to the office
use providing some security to the office user that the parking will be available
The Riverview Lot is a public lot and available at all times to the public This review does not make the lot
exclusively available to the office users but available generally to parkers in the area which is primarily the office
use
The office/parking use is consistent with the professional administrative zoning and the design of both the office
building and parking lot have previously been approved by the city
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Conditions of Approval
1 The public parking lot use (Riverview Lot) shall be available for public use as long as the adjacent 63 000 sq
ft office building is in use
Attachments
Application and plans
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No
Date / Z
Fee Paid r3
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
(With any application
Address of Project ,f2.1 `j /iurvi /EP/tile, 5r-- Assessor's Parcel No /UL— yy6, y Z.oc
Zoning District p j. Description of Project �� e be-i ,f)4i .<M5 (of
I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
Property Owner
Mailing Address
tt) Oc,�rc,vt.
6 Ai i /- 5�.1�(4 ,71 . _- eif;fmac,i7
/ { /I's 5, Mailing Address
Telephone No ' 39 4 ft.,
Telephone No 7 7 —Z
Signature Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action
Lot Size (dimensions)
Total Land Area
Hight of Buildings Stories
Principal
Accessory
•
Date of Public Hearing is
x sq ft Total Floor Area sq ft
' Proposed floor area (32 S ( sq ft
Feet p 1 y ,1 , Building Coverage _ _ sq ft
I Paved Impervious Area sq ft
/YI iT /r►' t (64 Number of off street parking spaces Li 2{E) — (cc>)
-5" 14-43 \-Cj v— pak,)4,i y ( 1--
/ — y ,'i 5- C.f.-7C-
z- -7-yam
•
•
APPEALS
BUILDING MOVING PERMITS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
—I CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
E —, GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN
I
DESIGN PERMIT
nGRADING PERMIT
1 i
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ON SITE SEWER PERMIT
r--I SITE ALTERATION PERMIT
1
n VARIANCE
VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT
I
ZONING AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
OTHER
Record of Action on Application
Decision Authortr
Date of Action 7 - 7- Cj v
Decision by Authority
Appeals Period (date)
•Appeal Filed (date)
Appeal Scheduled (date)
Appeal Decision Authority
Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date
Decision Complete (date)
l .IL 71( 211 ; 11 g// o"ll' »i
Pine Street
/
r-41-1
11
\--jr-- f.-- f---i
C
•
. ((Water
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
MEMORANDUM
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR R-----
DATE MAY 13, 1993
SUBJECT DESIGN REVIEW OF CUB OFFICE RENOVATION, 110 EAST PINE STREET (CASE
NO DR/93-11)
The proposed East Junior High School reuse/renovation plan was reviewed by the
Design Review Committee (Heritage Preservation Commission) May 3, 1993 and the
Planning Commission on May 10, 1993 The attached staff report and project
submittal document describe the project There are sixteen conditions of
approval recommended by the two City Design Review Agencies The conditions
basically require additional Design Review Committee review and comment on
project design details that are not available at this time
The office use is a permitted use in the Public Administrative/Office, PA,
Zoning District Required parking for the use is located on the east office
site (58 spaces) and west public parking lot (171 spaces) Fourteen of the
public lot spaces are located along Fourth Street It is proposed that they be
constructed as needed and not as part of the initial construction phase
The proposal has benefited from the public hearings and Design Review The
service area has been moved from the south (residential side) to the north
(commercial side) of the building The mechanical equipment has been relocated
to minimize visual or noise impact Parking on the east site has been
increased from 34 stalls to 58 stalls and other changes made to improve the
project
Details of design review, as conditioned, will have to be completed before
building permits for the project are issued
This review completes the Council plan approval for the project A related
action regarding the required TIF amendment appears elsewhere on the agenda
RECOMMENDATION
The Design Review Committee and Planning Commission unanimously recommended
project approval as conditioned
ATTACHMENTS
- Planning Commission Staff Report - DP/93-11
- Application and submittal - DR/93-11
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121
i
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO DR/93-11
Project Location 110 East Pine Street
Date May 13, 1993
Zoning District Public Administrative/Office, PA
Applicant's Name BWBR Architects, Inc
Type of Application Design Review
Project Description
The application is for renovation of and adaptive reuse of the East Junior
High Building for an office use The 1930 Junior High is a good example of a
Moderne Style school building that was typical of tne times The renovation
plans reorientate the building from the south (Pine Street) to the north
(Third Street/Downtown) by relocating the main entryway and constructing a
three story atrium
Changes to the extension of tne building are mainly on the north elevation
The emergency metal stairways are eliminated and replaced with windows
Windows similar to the existing windows are addea on either side of tne old
stairs are open on the building to the north A three story atrium entryway
opens the interior of the building to natural light and the sloped metal
roofed atrium lowers the profile of that new building element and merges it
into scale with the building The cupola on the building is reminiscent of the
Central School which once stood on this site
The west, south and east building faces remain as they currently exist
Rooftop mechanical equipment are shown in approximately the middle of the
roof This should minimize the view from the south or north sides Additional
consideration should be paid to the location of the mechanical regarding noise
and view
No landscape plan has been submitted This plan should coordinate with the
landscaping across the street on the West Parking Lot site
No trash storage area is located on the site plan The landscape plan is
conceptual only and lacks detail The parking layout shows a turn -around and
drop-off to accommodate off site parkers A lighting plan will be required
before final project approval The lighting plan should indicate fixture type,
location, height, and direct lighting down so the light source can not be seen
from adjacent streets
The color of the atrium should be a color compatible with the existing
building, possibly a brick, grey or dark green color No signage is proposed
If any signage is requested, it must go through Design Review If a sign is
desired, a low profile ground mounted sign along Third Street near the
driveway entry is suggested
1
•
•
It is difficult to see from the site plan but a sidewalk snould be constructed
from the entryway to Third Street connecting to the west site parking lot
Before final approval of the design, additional detail should be provided as
listed in the conditions of approval
Parking demand for the 67,199 square foot building is 224 spaces Fifty eight
spaces are provided on the east site and the public lot across the street will
provide 171 spaces, total 229 spaces
Recommendation
Approval
Findings
The renovation and adaptive reuse is consistent with the Downtown Design
Guidelines
Conditions of Approval
i' A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval
The plan shall indicate plant type, size, location as shown conceptually
in the proposed plans
2-- No trees by the ravines to the north and east sides of the building
shall be cut or removed without approval by the Community Development
Director
3 A light plan shall be submitted showing the fixture type, location and
lighting pattern Lighting shall be maintained on site and the light
source shall not be visible from adjacent areas
4 There shall be no night lighting to the south and east of the building
5 The color of tne atrium and window color shall be reviewed
6 A sidewalk shall be constructed from the north building entrance to
Third Street and West Parking Lot
►a
7 If trash is not kept outside, it should be screened by a structure
compatible with the color and material in the school building as
approved by the City
8 No signage is approved for the building Any signage otner than parking
lot directional signage shall require design review
9 The service entrance and access to the building should be located to the
northeast side of the building
10 The material of the mullion of the atrium and tne window alignment of
this atrium shall line with the existing windows
11 The mechanical equipment shall be placed on the roof behind the atrium
12 The service road on the east side of the building shall be remain as a
minimum service road
•
•
•
13 The east site shall accommodate maximum on -site parking consistent with
good circulation
14 The ravine area shall be cleaned up (dead trees removed and trash and
garbage removed)
15 There shall be no CUB employee parking on Pine Street between Third and
Broadway
16 The steeply sloped land shall be cleared of debris and dead vegetation
and maintained in a natural condition
Heritage Preservation Commission Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Attachment
Application and plans
Planning Commission Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
•
•
•
CASE NUMBER
Case 10 Tibor
Fee Paid
Date Fled
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property 110 Pine Street -
Logal Description of Property;
Name
Cub Foods, a Division of SUPERVALU, Inc
Owner
Address 126 Water Street Phone 779-2025
Applicant (if other than owner) Name BWBR Architects, Inc
Address 400 Sibley St , Suite 500 Phone
See attached sheet
222-3701
Type of Request; ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Proliminriry Plat
___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Pi..t
___ Variance ___ Other Design Permit
Description of Request Rgnovation of existing east junior high school to
Cub Foods Coruprate Headsuarters (See attached)
*NOTICE ENGINNEERING FEES MAY BE BILLED TO APPLICANT
Signature of Applicant
Date of Public Hearing HPC May 3, 1993, Planning Commission May 10, 1993
NOTE Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn on back of this form or at-
tached, showing the following
1 North direction
2 Location of proposed structure on lot
3 Dimensions of front and side set -backs
4 Dimensions of proposed structure
5 Street names
6 Location of adjacent existing buildings
7 Other information as may be requested
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on (date)
sublet; to the following conditions _
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on subiect to the
following conditions
Comments (Use other side).
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO PR/92-57
Planning Commission Meeting November 9, 1992
Project Location 110 East Pine Street
Zoning District Public Administrative/Office
Applicant's Name CUB Foods
Type of Application Parking Review
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Review of required parking for conversion of the East Wing of the Junior High
School to an office building -
Discussion
The proposed office use is a permitted use in the Public Administrative/Office
District The East Junior High School Building has 63,254 square feet The
space includes lunch room, locker rooms and gymnasium The parking requirement
for an office use is one space per 300 square feet or 210 spaces for the East
Wing Building CUB officials have indicated that, depending on relocation, 175
to 200 employees will be moved from their downtown location to the site
A parking lot is located north of the East Junior High Building The existing
paved area can accommodate approximately 70 spaces dependent on layout Tnis
lot could be affected by the reorientation of the building entrance a+tay from
the Pine Street residential area to the north The plans for the renovation
are not yet available for review in conjunction with parking
--z
CUB is purchasing the West Wing of the -Junior High site and giving that
building and site to the City The intent of the City is to provide parking on
the West Building site for the East Building office use and study the reuse
of the West Building
A review of the West site parking areas indicates that approximately 137
spaces can be provided in three locations (See attached maps ) The Lower
Third parking lot can accommodate 75 spaces with minimal retaining wall
construction As many as 87 spaces could be accommodated at this location with
major retaining wall construction The driveway and adjacent area to the South
of the school power plant can accommodate 35 spaces with the recontouring of
the sloped area North of Pine Street and removal of the garage behind the
school and boiler plant
The third West Building parking area is located just off Fourth Street behind
the school Depending on design, that lot can accommodate 27 cars All the
West building sites are within 300 feet of the office use as required by the
Zoning Ordinance The Fourth Street site may not be needed based on employee
relocation and final parking lot design
The total supply of East and West on -site parking is 207 spaces This number
may vary dependent on final parking lot design and construction As with other
•
•
development projects, this review does not include on -street parking, although
parking spaces are available on South Third and South Fourth Street The
parking situation will be monitored to make sure employees are parking in
designated areas and not impacting the adjacent residential area One way of
managing parking is to assign an actual space to each employee Other methods
of reducing parking demand, such as car pooling or ride sharing can reduce
parking demand Also, the parking lots can be designed for some compact space
which can increase the parking supply by 10 to 15%
The City of Stillwater is beginning to study the reuse of the West Junior
High The Stillwater Junior High Reuses Study prepared by the Preservation
Alliance is provided as background information A Task Force will study the
possibility of converting the school to a community center with a variety of
activities Current plans call for closing tne West Junior High after the
current 1992-93 school year A reuse decision should be made by June 1994
It is probable that the arrangement of parking described above will not oe the
final lot configuration and design for the office use and possible West
Building reuse The on -site soace can adequately provide for the initial year
of office operation After the West Building reuse study is concluded, and
its future use determined, a new review of parking will be required to make
sure there is adequate parking for the office use and West Building use
Dependent on West Building use, a shared parking arrangement may work for some
of the West Building use after normal working hours
RECOMMENDATION
Approval
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1 Two hundred on -site parking spaces shall be provided in the four lots,
East Building (70 spaces), Lower Third (75) spaces, Upper Tnird (35)
spaces and Fourth Street (27 spaces)
2 All office employees shall park in tne above designated lots
3 All lots shall be paved and striped with safe access as approved by the
City Engineer
4 This parking approval is good for one year after tne East Building
occupancy and shall be reviewed by the City in June 1994 to reconsider
the parking arrangement and future use of the West Building
5 The frontyard (Pine Street) and street sideyard (Third Street) of tne
East office site shall remain in landscaping and not be converted to
parking
6 The final plans for the parking lot improvements shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Director
ATTACHMENT
Maps
•
•
•
CASE NVS:R
Ccsc T(c,--ce- Teti-2 -.-5Z
Fee °c c TD ov
Z'!Dc'e
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORA',
Street Locct,cr of PrvCe, 7y
110 E Pine Street
City Of StillMater, Block 35, Lo's 8-22
-Lcccl Doscr,;,t,cr c; Pr cce
Owrer. Nc ,e
Indepence't School District #831-
Address i875 Creelef Street
,
Phcre 439-8230
Add-ers 127 Water Street P';cre 779-2052
iy; e c, Recuest _-- Recer ;g _-- Apprevcl o; Prel, ;;ir,c-y No:
Scec cl Use Perrnt7 ___ Approval of F,ncl Plc;
_-- Vc-,cr,cz _-- Other 14.- __ af-W3—
Descr ipt.on of Resuesi. re "ieW o f
__.k,.1.:y_na.tj.g_Sor approximately 200 enplo,rees parking. spaces
,
Will be planned for the East and West Junior Hign School Parcels
Sicnc7ure of Applicant. _.1 � DS
Data of PubIic hearing
NOT:..' Sk ch of proposea prover y a d structure to be czar% or. Coca OI 4:1 :Or= Or at-
tic :ea, snowing tr e g
1 North aira_ton.
2 Loca..on o: proeosed str,.cture on Ict.
3 Dire' s.ors oI izont .nc s ce se-oacks
4 Dinens.ors oL proposes strt.cture.
5 Street na-es
6 Locator. o: ac ac0._nt east rg ouucargs
7 Other i:..:er ato - as may be ragLes`a.c.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Com,mics.cr. cn (date)
sJblec: to the following. c;,rc,-,crs.
Aap-cved _- De :sec' ___ by e Ccunc'I cn 1 +:.„
s.,blec4 .o ..,�
fcllow,r,g ccr.c,t,or.s.
Cc,-zre ;j.s n ica n+t+n. ,]„\
MEMORANDUM
TO Planning Commission
FR Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA January 4, 1995
RE REVIEW OF GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PROJECT CHANGES FOR
STILLWATER GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER SUP/94-6
Since the city approval of the special use permit, the final grading/drainage plan and landscape
plan has been revised The grading/drainage plan is being reviewed by the city engineer to make
sure that project runoff will not impact adjacent properties The landscape plan has been
modified to accommodate the revised grading/drainage plan `
Neighbors have expressed concerns with the project construction and have been notified of this
meeting
Recommendation
Review project changes particularly the revised landscape plan
Condition of Approval
1 Any erosion or siltation caused by site runoff shall be repaired or cleaned up by Good
Samaritan
•
17
/ -/
4
® // /
December 27, 1994
Mr Klayton Eckles
City Engineer
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Klayton
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE 200 SEH CENTER ST PAUL MN 55110 612 490 2000 800 325 2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
RE Stillwater, Minnesota
Good Samantan Center Drainage Investigation
SEH No A-DESIG9401 00
In response to the meeting held in your office on December 13,1994 with Dick Moore, Russ Rosa
and Ann Terwedo, we are providing the following information in advance of the January 9 1995
Planning Commission meeting to address runoff and screening issues
The residents adjacent to the Good Samaritan site have expressed apparent concern over the
function of the pond, the direction of discharge and a number of other issues related to runoff from
the site The attachment illustrates the project site relative to the adjacent properties and indicates
the current direction of drainage for the site As we have previously indicated, the ponding area
is designed to function in a wet/dry manner That is, the pond will temporarily detain runoff until
it can dram dry after a rainfall event The discharge from the pond is designed to control the rate
of runoff for both the 1 year and 100 year events to that rate which currently discharges from the
site in the undeveloped condition Referring to our computations dated July 11 1994, as previously
submitted to you, the 1 year and 100 year discharges from the site in the existing condition are 0 5
cfs and 4 4 cfs, respectively The second attachment illustrates the area contributing runoff to the
pond The pond is designed to control runoff to the pond to the rates currently discharging from
the site
Current runoff conditions from the site tend to pond water on the property directly to the south of
the site as indicated on Attachment 1 Under fmal grading conditions of the site, water is diverted
east and is contained in the pond which ultimately discharges along the property line and to an
existing swale through the backyards of the properties abutting North William Street
The pond out, a 24 culvert under the berm, was apparently 1 foot too high With the elevation
lowered, the pipe will discharge in a sump condition That is, water will flow out of the pipe and
then rise up to flow out in a southwesterly direction into the existing swale This condition will help
by reducing some of the energy of the discharge and will be less unsightly Additional landscape
screening could be planned around the outlet area to reduce the negative visual impact that may
be perceived by the residents
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC MINNEAPOLIS MN ST CLOUD MN CHIPPEWA FALLS WI
MADISON WI
Mr Klayton Eckles
December 27, 1994
Page 2
Implementation of the grading plan does not change the current rate of discharge from the site from
existing conditions Furthermore, the grading should be an improvement to the property lying
directly to the south of the site since runoff from the site will be contained m the pond and
discharged m a more southwesterly direction, reducing water ponding in the backyard as was
noted by the homeowner during our preliminary field visit in July of 1994
One fmal modification to the grading plan will be to grade a very slight low point in the berm that
contains the pond on the south and east sides The purpose of the berm will be to allow water to
overflow southeasterly in the direction which will prevent water from reaching the low property
to the south This overflow would function only in the event of a severe storm or plugging of the
outlet pipe The intention of the overflow would be to allow runoff to flow in the same direction
as the pipe outlet
Klayton, we are prepared to present this information to the Planning Commission on January 9
If you require any additional information in advance of the meeting, please call me direct at 490-
2028
Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc
-1411A^I'''
Mark L Lobermeier, P E
Project Engineer
tlo
Attachments
c Steve Russell, City of Stillwater
Dick Moore, SEH
Russ Rosa, Project Manager
•
•
•
•
�Illwater
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
December 27, 1994
RE SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Dear Property Owner
The City of Stillwater will review the landscape plan fro Good Samaritan Center at 1119 Owens
Street North, Charles Huyink, applicant Case No SUP/94-6
The Planning Commission will be reviewing this case at a public heanng on Monday, January 9,
1995, at 7 p m , in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street
If you have any comments or concerns regarding this review, please attend the meeting
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to call the Community
Development Department at 439-6121
Enclosure
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121
cl t M.t..u„ lorra ta
mat
r runt lot 14 raw
(I IIMa1A Asap suit]
SANDERS
WACKER
WEHRMAN
BERGLY
LANDSCAPE ARCiITECTS AND PLANNERS
365 East Kelogg Bc ievard
Sant Pal, Mnnesota 55101
612 221 0401 Fax. 612 297 6817
wr1lc Iar entrance
0 k 6tr..t
rM Bterst
--whka4 .ntr
rartal 1st 72 tpsces
(n h.ilne 4 h nd u p
stall J
mid Out pdwtrls
am r It
Prellmlrury Concept Ilan for the
West Parking Area
-.iL��lY1
L-t9 w e r (e I
LEGEND
MISCELLANEOUS
exietJng contours to remain
proposed contours
property line
haul poi t (epib • m y
M 1 4 deco Ms pal and
fnu t.1 Int. pretha
.h Mar a d/ r artwork)
r r*I a be
(I IdIt4h /lcp
ta�J
5rrE ELEMENTS
retaining wall
ornamental fence with 'tone columns
ornamental light standard
parking lot light standard
J I IL bituminous parking lot
Stillwater Minnesota
28 Apr111995
4 • d
North
Scale 1 e 3O
l t 1 concrete walk
paver surfacing
6tepe
SITE FURNf1URE
ornamental bench
ornamental bench with chairs
PLANTINGS
street tree In tree grates or pavans
columnar shade treed
evergreen trace
screen hedge
ornamental shrubs and perennials
r
•
•
f
_11
LH_
A f'�,tr r,\ /
Arip 1-1 C)/N,7
oo SNl'44il1 J2 [ID /
•
4t t 'AS
�— /A/ PLACE •
WEST 'N I L sro 01, 4�
/171-d'
-0EGL to &E. P_ 2 / 99
/ x/si A16
i1-CILlTi
r••
•
•OP•
•
•
•.•.
1
•
•••••11
• • • • • •••i
0
0
Los# • dia
Ci7;171 Po
�AT/V
6q-�E,4
Sue- 192E4
bO(%I DA41e.`'
Low /7fE4
.'lau
92S
ti
Akk/
ICETA /A/M16? WALL
t
J l
Dg,✓- wq y
- "rzz 'Nv 91,q I7
oo0 Sn r i ►11 f\J L IZ 11-rVieJ-1 M E /AT /\ ID 2
WEsi W► LI�►►�S
•
•
\J)
•
z
s -r r ! L. W ` ►? , M , IJ kJ g s o A
�„ _ 1/-o
"OLCrill P___ 21 l �a
•
•
•
To: Stillwater Planning Commission Jan 4, 1995
From: Frey Lube, Inc
Sub] : Meeting of Jan 9 1995
Case No SUP/94-65
Due to the replatting of outlot C of the Stillwater
Marketplace in November of 1994, there is now a resurvey of
that particular property currently in progress Therefore a
complete grading plan will not be available at this time I
hereby request that the hearing for the special use permit be
postponed until the February meeting Your patience and
understanding is, and always appreciated
e
Sincerely,
,(-)Pesie/it(2 2
Robert A Fr'ey
Frey Lube, Inc
0 MEMORANDUM
TO Planning Commission
40FR Planning Staff
DA January 199�
RE REZONING 2001 WASHINGTON AVE CASE NO ZAM/95 4
Background
The 1979 Comprehensive Plan Policies addressed the development of the Industrial Park to serve commercial and industrial
development The road system has been developed for these purposes
In 1990 the city adopted the West Business Park Plan an amendment to Stillwaters Comprehensive Plan This plan has established
goals and objectives for future development of the area which clearly provide an appropriate framework for industrial and commercial
development These policies include
• Encourage new land uses compatible with existing land uses
• Provide adequate land for industrial development of the next 20 years
• Provide foi compatible mix of industrial office service commercial and community uses through the area land use plan
The land use plan identified industrial (BP I) zoning north of Curve Crest Blvd and east of Northv.estern Avenue commercial land
uses were identified south of Tower Drive and along Highway 5 due to the existing land uses and visibility to major highways
Discussion
The proposal by Andersen Windows to rezone 2001 Washington Avenue from (BP C) Commercial to (BP I) Industrial is to allow the
land to be used for a light manufacturing warehouse and office use
•Presently the commercial zoning (BP C) does not allow for manufacturing or warehouse uses to be located in this area However
office uses would be permitted By rezoning this area manufacturing uses are permitted and warehouse uses permitted with a special
use permit
The adjacent existing land uses to the property include a motel and carwash to the east office service and a restaurant use to the west
office and retail to the north and Highway 36 to the -south as outlined General retail has shifted in the past year to the west at the
Stillwater Market Place location Rezoning this parcel from commercial to industrial would not affect land available for commercial
purposes
Also the policies outlined form the West Business Park Plan are consistent with the proposal Light manufacturing office and
warehouse uses are compatible with the adjacent land uses as outlined and would not negatively impact those uses The proposal
provides for a mix of uses in the area The road system in the Business Park and Highway 36 can provide for the proposed land uses
In fact the proposed use will have less of an impact on the existing transportation system
Findings
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the policies in the West Stillwater Business Park Plan an element of the Stillwater
Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons
I The proposed uses are compatible with the existing land uses
2 The proposed uses provide for a mix of industrial office service commercial and community uses
Staff Recommendation
Approval
•
0
•
EXISTING ZONING
Business Park
41
al
bp-c
bp-1
bp-o
c
ca
cbd
1 pa
r1
r4
I Ira
rb
rch
rcm
•
HWAY NO.36
Cra-
•
OPLE�NS ST
N L7
p►PCEL 1
co
0
L7
PLnCEL
rn
47
/r CP?_:r �1.1
0
cc
Gurl C1
FR
HIGHLt ND CT
0 , Cr
PARCEL 4
/ 1 r I 1
1 a
1-
TAGE RDAD
/41 1/vVAV 3
\E2 ►.11 IU �--
SV
i
T
-11
ApTAceNT
LAND
uses
IC[1'
\
11
1-11-111)
i' Y\ ZAM/95 -4
n
cnm?Arf <!A!lr5
Lor11c1 cN
t01L10< on
C1r111(L_LIILILQLY
Igw(1 on
--I I lI IJ 1
r I
C11410v B1 "C
110111 11U 0
SITE
I c cncf
<,< ,
•
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No SUP/DR/95 5
Planning Commission Date January 9 1995
Project Location 2001 Washington Avenue
Zoning District Business Park District
Applicant's Name Andersen Windows
Type of Application Special Use Permit
Project Description
A special use permit to conduct a warehouse light manufacturing, office use
/
C
Discussion
The request is to reuse the entire "old" CUB Store as a light manufacturing, warehouse office use
Andersen s will employ approximately 95 to 120 individuals at this location The warehouse use will employ 10 to 15
people on three shifts The light manufacturing use will employ 10 to 15 on one shift A majority of the employees, 75
to 90, will be in the office
Traffic
As outlined in the attached letter and analysis of truck traffic, according to Andersen representatives, there will be 2 350
less trips outgoing and incoming to the site per year or 34 less trips per weeks Also there will be no customer traffic
generated by this use since this site will no longer be a retail outlet CUB presently generals 4,800 cars per day
The local streets in the Business Park have been upgraded to four lanes with raised medians and signals The existing
road system can accommodate truck traffic directly to Highway 36 or to County Road 5
Parking Demand
The warehouse use in the structure will be 67,200 sq ft According to the Stillwater parking regulations Subd 26 of
Chapter 31 01 of the City Code the demand will be approximately 67 parking spaces The light manufacturing use of
16 800 sq ft will generate 51 parking spaces and the 9,500 sq ft of office space use will generate 47 parking spaces
There would therefore, be a total parking demand of 165 parking spaces The existing lot presently has approximately
597 parking spaces available The site can accommodate all the uses proposed
Trailer parking on the site will be located along the east side of the building as presently exists There will be no increase
in the trailer parking by the change from a retail use to manufacturing/office/warehousing
The rezoning request (ZAM/95 4) is to allow this use by a special use permit identifies adjacent land uses There will be
no exterior noise level or visual impacts which would negatively impact adjacent properties
The Design Review Committee reviewed and approved the landscape plan and signage proposal at their regular meeting
on January 5 199s They approved the plan and felt in would actually improve the site The report is attached
Findings
The proposal meets the policies of the West Business Park Land Use Plan and Industrial Zoning (BP-1)
Recommendation
Approval
Conditions of Approval
S
1 The phase II landscaping shall be done within 18 months
2 There shall be no outside storage of materials on site
Attachments
Application package
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO SUP/DR/95
PROJECT LOCATION 2001 Washington Avenue
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT Business Park Commercial
ZONING DISTRICT BP-C
FLOOD PLAIN No SHORELAND/BLUFFLAND No
APPLICANT'S NAME Andersen Windows
TYPE OF APPLICATION Design Review
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design Review for signage and landscaping for an
office/warehouse/light industrial use at 2001 Washington Avenue
DISCUSSION
The request is to use the "old" Cub Foods Grocery Store as an office/warehouse/light industrial
use The building will essentially stay the same with modifications to the signage and
landscaping Theie will be no additional air ventilation systems added to the roof of the
structure
All existing Cub Foods and tenant signage will be removed along with the pylon sign Andersen
Windows will then add one sign in the brown band area above the main entrance The sign will
be appiouimately 30 feet x 2 feet
Landscaping will be added along the east property line as well as in front of the main entrance
which will soften the look of this large parking lot The landscaping will be done in two phases,
the first phase includes all the landscaping on the east property line and the second in front of the
building The overhead lighting will be removed along the south border of the property No
other lighting will be added
FINDINGS
The pioposal meets the intent of the Business Park Design Guidelines and Sign Ordinance
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval
DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION Approval
•
s
ANDERSEN CORPORATION
December 23 1994
Stillwater Planning Commission/City Council
The following is a description of how the existing Cub facility would be utilized by Andersen Corporation
The overall operation will be a combination of warehousing Tight manufacturing and office personnel
The warehouse will utilize about 80% of the floor space and would operate on three shifts Items that
will be stored in the warehouse consists of hardware screws vinyl parts extension jambs and items
of this sort It will take approximately 10 15 people to manage and maintain the warehouse This will
occupy approximately 67 200 square feet of floor space
Light manufacturing will occupy the remaining portion of the floor space This will consist of a one shift
low volume assembly line which uses small clamps nailer drills and pumps This line is used to
produce obsolete items that we no longer manufacture on a continuous basis It will take
approximately 10 15 people to operate the light manufacturing area which will use about 16 800
square feet There will not be any industnal equipment (fans grinders filter systems etc) added to
the exterior of the current building
There is 9 500 square feet of office space on a mezzanine We would locate approximately 75 90
office personnel in this area These offices would be utilized on the day shift only which will range
from 6 00 AM to 5 00 PM
The material handling equipment that will be used to service the warehouse and manufactunng area
will consist of 5 6 electric forklifts (or equivalent type of equipment) We use electnc equipment
because they are quiet and do not emit carbon monoxide
Our truck traffic is based on operating Monday through Fnday with an occasional Saturday Two thirds of the
truck traffic will be dunng the day time hours The daily tnps will increase dunng our peak season (June
August) and will decrease throughout the rest of the year Andersen annual inbound tnps from outside
suppliers is approximately 2 600 trips per year or having an average of eleven tnps per day The trips
projected from the current Cub Building to the Bayport facility will be approximately 4 000 trips per year or an
average of 17 per day Our overall trucking will be approximately 6 600 tnps per year or 140 trips per week
The current truck traffic at the Cub facility is based on a seven day operation Their daily average tnps is 26
The weekly average is 174 or 8 950 trips per year In comparison between the two operations Andersen will
have an estimated 2 350 less tnps per year or 34 less trips per week
There would also be substantially less automobile traffic due to the change in how the property will be utilized
Approximately 150 200 parking spaces will be used for Andersen personnel with a few of those spaces
being dedicated to visitors Trailer parking will stay about the same as Cub s There are eight spaces allowed
on the North East comer of the building for parking trailers
The overall site will be reviewed in the future for further expansion needs
Sincerely
Jerry Larson
I00 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH BAYPORT MINNESOTA 55003 1096 612 439 5150
•
•
•
Operation:
- Warehousing and Light Manufacturing
• Warehouse 3 shifts
hardware, screws, vinyl parts, ext jambs, etc
• Light Manufacturing 1 shift
clamps, nailers, pumps, small assembly line
• Offices 1 shift
consist
- Personnel
• Warehouse 10 - 15
• Manufacturing 10 - 15
• Office 75 - 90
Total 95 - 120
- Material Handling Equipment
• 5-6 Electric Forklifts (or equivalent type of equipment)
Note:
There will not be any industrial equipment (fans, grinders, filter
systems, etc) added to the exterior of the current building
•
•
Truck Traffic:
- AW Annual Trips
• Supplier Inbound
2600 per year or 11 per day avg
• CUB to Bayport
4000 per year or 17 per day avg
Total 6600 per year or 28 per day avg (140/wk)
Note
1 Operating Monday - Friday with an occasional Saturday
2 2/3 of the truck traffic will be during the daytime hours
3 The daily trips will increase during the peak season (June -
August) and will decrease throughout the rest of the year
- CUB Annual Trips
• Supplier Inbound
26 trips/day x 6 days + 18 trips/Sun = 174 trips/wk
174 trips/wk - 7 days = 24 86 per day avg
24 86 trips/day x 360 days/year = 8,950 trips/year
- CUB Trips -vs- AW Trips
• CUB Truck Trips per year 8,950
• AW Truck Trips per year 6,600
Less AW Truck Trips per year 2,350 or
(174 trips/wk CUB - 140 trips/wk AW = 34 Tess trips/wk AW)
• There would also be substantially Tess automobile traffic due to the
change in how this property would be utilized
re
A:
ar. 11.•&-#i .f7,44V
•
•
s •
-', • '
,..77
„7,,,,
.4r.. p-,,w;--,4-
-/---, --
...0....1hr.,5., ...., .,..,- t...,
,,,x-,
---,,,,v",,, ,- , _3;5. f,,, ,
..-
#. 4
04.
4*-nrak#S71.---,..2gr..:# - 1_4_ •+•
•
e.X..#
• - ••i•
1.4`.
3 %
• "w- th,t-
- - • #6!#,e,..34ct,.. ?Ea' s• •
sr -
` -4•10L-4.~1%-^—e%- - ,
Ar'
y- - •1 -5,--"," "`-'1.-3'.1 DAPIlilibt '-r1P.." IPVIT:"' .-"'-'1
t ter— e- .....0, .3... 43b.44....k. ... if,. .1.-.4,,,,,:e • •
. _ I ,, r, 'SA' -....TAX•r—r% . ;77Lii-v----4-4161.01'.4" •:"
•Ve A " 1.6.7,.....,441aQ
Lr", "IA -•• -. . I .... t t .r.- 0 ... i",7 t• ',-.ii-
_ .
• '. 74 ....-1,er,....-i.,10 .1 A ...... 1f.. A { ,...... ... .....• ".. 41 .44 A. fifri fl... 44 ,e..7a4 A ,-.4. 1: -....X.f.&420, -fte''2;111.4. - . rf• ...TO: -• • • -• •-: .. ..' .7 ''.
ti .. _,.:,.„..„ .,........4:.. ......v..,....;„...,..,...:,....444,..:..:Fr,.-:::...e,..v.,,.....4.,..1... ...........,.,.:.;•-.:,:;:i,.-et.:::4.i.-_,,,,::.,,,--.g.,........
5.
, %49:004.4i1,-•. al. .,••• ,...," fr. -`; .f.f...-L.,-....kl.,... --.- Nr-,-..........
11##
• #1:###r;S:;:are,,-•
V6gelOPPW., *.13 Vart#47'
is-11.`r-C•
:147:
;Zak'
.e.
I:-
,- 34•:;-'1,e, .... .1.
ix isat„.
, ' , , i , 9 - - ---;itfka-41.4;tE gel
,. ... ...,.. ...., , ....;.c.
'4 - .,!, %"., 4-"--•.- •tr.t,....,h4i1".':, k...)-i'jr—
h-r `1:-.?, 4V1;5.. ;1.7.--,:-- -4-.:171-;c40,1;414-4t-tz.lrl-e-C -4 4 rA-4 er"4-,,-3-•V.-1
r#*"
1r A\
as.Vi 441 )1
C6144fT41)+.4,tr.
s a PP. Jr. ,r4f14
4 -tyr,,etrrkorn 1.14.2,14 -v.4
••••••At, `LP #
J.-# 6 xi-
4
41 tt.7 r-
-
tAT
roa.
7
# #:‘
4 c$1?1:k7;.;14:;:X. 4sto
44",po
.^.." -0 4 .‘
J Ir. "1 A? 1 ,.7.1!srzfor rl•
=iv; ..tbrialc'2141--kik444
t/c•-, •SP" 1
-strck
u 1/1 „rt., iictrIfF ,aay,42.
' A
x, 4
04.4- 11;4
Krat4;404.T.,,,ssl 1,
r# t
- Vt-¢
•
•
EKczY-1tJ4.• $ul b)
R\.
S-r
1aNte
• CJ,G44e t""+4 t •
•
Ex ASN
•
tx OAK.
Ex ASH
Ex MIAIT JULEP JiJAIIPER
Ex Couiritifift. (3vckTHoanl
Ell rEGHNEY nfiettIPV,rnt
Et DwF !SR►JTI ODGWOoo
-?,__, \,\,-v
?.._to Orr
P R R
CONCRtTF CUR (TpP)
It 1 N Cr
(_* -',\_) \ A---
1
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No SUP/95-1
Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995
Project Location 515 South Sixth Street
Zoning District RB, Two Family Residential
Applicant's Name William Wahlberg
Type of Application Special use permit
Project Description
A special use permit to conduct a beauty shop out of a residential structure at 515 South Sixth
Street
Discussion
The request is to conduct a single chair hair salon which would employ only the occupant of the
home The applicant has indicated that there are approximately four (4) parking spaces on the
site which could accommodate customer parking Staff visited the site and found this to be true
Mr Wahlberg will have a site plan prepared at meeting time for the commission's review
No one will be employed by Mr Wahlberg
Findings
The proposal meets the intent of the land use plan and zoning ordinance
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Conditions of Approval
1 No exterior signage is allowed
2 No employees shall be allowed
3 Proof of state operating licenses shall be submitted for the file
4 One salon chair is allowed
Attachments
Letter
Application
•
•
•
/2 - 7 -94/
70 \f /-I DM IT SAY CON ,
SUE RES1CT� uL_L_' REQUESI
PERM SS1 cN To oETP N P\ SPEE N
PERMIT FoR A or-PER5rnJ
NA1R CP\tME SHOP VvE \PNE PLENT
OF OFF - 3WEE T PARKING (3-F cJT
DR\V ExNp\`! CN E IN C ROT AS
CN L I ONE CAR No0 LD t.5u r\LL'1 8E
}ARE- \NE FEEL IT w0JL1 BE A
5E NEB IT To DOR nMMU N IT, 'P5
soN\EONE w01I-D ' PIRGUN.D
3NG THE DP'(- HELPFUL IF
NEI AEORNCC CNILF (ET
1�XED CC THE \oUSE ACC i bENi
ALLY, DR it) WA T cif FDR DUPC W
(5Ms
\NE ALSO FEEL - i 1�15 \ U )
NcT BE PS DIs vAi\nsa_ To
P CND THERE Ana mo SMELLS
CP NU5E OUST CAE OF OUR 43AL
NOPE you BRAN T US
TH15 PERMIT 4- 1F YOU
HIVE ANY QuEsT ►ONS,
PLEP\SE Ma. US,
'i30 -254/0 012 35) --71441
iNAN K you
bt Li_ `c\; AH LBERG
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
X Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No SUPA
Date 7"
Fee Paid i %Q `7"-
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
•vith any application
Address of Project 5 ic5 G -1 k 5T �D
Zoning District 4 Description of Project
,jinsi O'i scI1 Vc lows i CC ALL
Assessors Parcel No 9 3 05— U 3 I G
,rv-ic, II bee (.4.1 f me,-5
I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my
knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
Property Owner LC%11ic,,-v1 LA) C4%I1(bY J
Mailing Address 5 i j f� th St 50
Telephone No 3 S / 7',' 6r
Signature GO Ca. GcJ -ye
Representative
Mailing Address
Telephone No
Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action
•
Lot Size (dimensions) 6 x /50 sq ft ' 7UU
Total Land Area Cj qp- ct fl
Hight of Buildings Stoma Feet
Principal / Art, A 7 Zya
Accessory /
Total Floor Area gip, +160 sq ft bo-vh `iktap, 1150 Q t r 1
Proposed floor area 45c, Ae, , sq ft ork s J
Building Coverage,Pg, l,y.o sq ft
Paved Impervious Area 400 sq ft Jo x 30
Number of off street parking spaces 1- C A iCE
Date of Public Hearing is
APPEALS
BUILDING MOVING PERMITS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN
DESIGN PERMIT
t_J
GRADING PERMIT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ON SITE SEWER PERMIT
SITE ALTERATION PERMIT
VARIANCE
VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT
ZONING AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
OTHER
Record of Action on Application
Decision Authority
Date of Action
Decision by Authority
Appeals Period (date)
Appeal Filed (date)
Appeal Scheduled (date)
Appeal Decision Authority
Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date
Decision Complete (date)
0
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO SUP/95-6
• Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995
Project Location 704 South First Street
Zoning District RB - Two Family Residential
Applicant's name Gary Vizenor, Jr
Type of application Special Use Permit
Project description A special Use Permit to conduct a 3-bedroom Bed and Breakfast
Discussion
The request is to conduct a 3-bedroom bed and breakfast in a 105 year old Queen -Anne Victoiian home at 704
South First Street Major restoration of the exterior of the home has been conducted during the last two years
The interior main rooms are intact including all original pocket doors and stained glass windows The kitchen
has been updated along with major interior work on the attic It has been converted to a single bedroom
In order to provide for three bed and breakfast rooms, minimal work needs to be done These are shoe n on the
building floor plan and include opening two doorways into existing bedrooms from proposed or existing
bathrooms No structural elements will be changed
The applicants have stated that one individual will be living on -site as the owner/manager All other issues
relating to the bed and breakfast seem to be covered in the applicant's submission packet with the exception of
signage One four square foot sign is allowed
•The proposed parking plan includes developing four parking spaces for the bed and breakfast use This is
consistent with the ordinance Three parking spaces will be used for the bed and breakfast and one for
owner/manager An additional parking space will be located in the can cage house
Low perimeter lighting should be installed along the 16 feet walk between the parking lot and homes
Landscaping to include coniferous trees and low hedges should be planted along the north side of the parking lot
in order to buffer the parking lot from the street
Heritage Preservation Commission Review
The Heritage Pieservation Commission reviewed the proposal at their regular meeting on January 4, 1995 A
condition in the bed and breakfast ordinance requires that the Heritage Preservation Commission review bed and
breakfast proposals to determine if the size of the home and if the number of original bedrooms can
accommodate the proposed use In this case, the home is 3,154 square feet and has four original bedrooms The
commission agreed that this home met these conditions
Conditions of approval See attached
Recommendation Approval
Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance
• Attachments Application package
•
•
•
Case No SUP/95-6
Conditions of Approval
1 All building and fire inspections shall be conducted p►ior to the business being conducted
2 A county inspection report along with other proof of operation licenses and state sales and
use tax numbers shall be submitted to the community development department
3 No guest parking is allowed on the street
4 Guest parking shall be signed The type of signage shall be reviewed by the planning staff
5 The dining facilities are not open to the public including guests from other bed and breakfast
establishments
6 City staff shall review the style, size and location of the sign The sign shall be four (4)
square feet No other signage is allowed
7 A lighting plan including height and location for the perimeter shall be submitted and
approved by the planning department
•
•
•
Steetwateit 90te Delievremeat
Veal dace oil 7164eae4ota
20 9ete e
January 2, 1995
Ann Terwedo
Planning
City of Stillwater
Re Inspection 704 So 1st St
Ann
On December 27, 1994 I was requested to do an Inspection at 704 So
1st St to determine the improvements to be made to apply for a B&B
permit I was met there by Gary Viznor, realtor, who toured me
through the structure My findings are as follows
1) A wired interconnected smoke detection system needs to be
installed with detectors on each level of the structure
2) Smoke detectors must also be provided in each room used for
sleeping These need not be interconnected and can be battry powered
3) The rear stairway should have a twenty minute fire -rated door
separating the basemet from the first level It shold also be fitted
with an automatic self closer which shold be connected to the smoke
detection system Also a like door should be placed to the third
floor
4) A fire extinguisher with a minimum rating of 2A10BC shall be
mounted in the kitchen area
If you have any further questions feel free to contact me at
439-6120
Respect
62‘l
Captain Robert C Barthol
Inspections/Investigations
Stillwater Fire Deptment
216 llama %uat! Soaeet SR,l1watac Well 550,2
(612) 439 6120
(612) 4391318
(612) 439-1313
jax (612) 439-0456
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
910,
Y,im,rh
Ott
-
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
X
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No J a/a,
Date II : -;
Fee Paid
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
•with an application
Address of Project 704/ 1 S7" $ s0 Assessors Parcel No 93 0 s " o? 00
Zoning District /Q g Description of Project Sipe ci 4/ Ilse Rem, 4- -i-D dpei44-e /'e5, et/e,vc.e,
0.: 3 ues4- 1c"-i Bed and ,tg/tea_ it- -firms - t"sfa,b/shtie Al -A-
I herebN state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted here ith in all respects to the best of my
knoN%ledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used '
1PoPosed
Property Owner «7 h,v 4 Eloise, /9n0-1-04)
Mailing Address dog 7 SfAfe Ad I/6
peep PARR-, wr 5-906 7
Telephone No 7/S- 076 9 - 53075 Telephone No y39- 7,06
•
Representative G AQ R y V z e ivo /Q 7 A
Mailing Address /91'3 So G,Iee/efre S74
Sw, # /913 //4 4 fe r,, /1/1/ s 56c'a
Signature .�,a 2 _ 577 1/eSignature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action
Lot Size (dimensions) /35 x /D f sq ft Total Floor Area 3/5l/ sq ft
Total Land Area /y e 9C Sg .-+ Proposed floor area figMe_ sq ft
Hight of Buildings Stones Feet Building Coverage /an sq ft
Principal 3 Paved Impervious Area /6CO sq ft
Accessory oZ Number of off street parking spaces 5-
Date of Public Hearing is
•
•
•
r 1 APPEALS
LI
F
BUILDING MOVING PERMITS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN
DESIGN PERMIT
GRADING PERMIT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ON SITE SEWER PERMIT
1
SITE ALTERATION PERMIT
VARIANCE
VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT
ZONING AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
1 !
1
i
OTHER
Record of Action on Application
Decision Authority
Date of Action
Decision by Authorm
Appeals Period (date)
Appeal Filed (date)
Appeal Scheduled (date)
Appeal Decision Authority
Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date
Decision Complete (date)
704 1st ST SO
•
•
Proposed use and operation of
Victorian Bed & Breakfast
To Planning Commission/Heritage Preservation Commission
Submittea before you on this date December 23, 1994 this
application to request a special use permit according to
the requirements of the City Council for the City of
Stillwater, Minnesota
A purchase agreement as been consimated between Frank
and Jean Kubitschek (sellers) and John and Eloise Anton
(purchasers) for the property located at 704 1st St So
Stillwater Subject to approval of special use permit
to operate residence as a 'Bed & Breakfast Establishment
John and Eloise Anton are long -respected homeowners of
the New Richmond, UI community, Mr Anton is the owner
of his own upholstery and antique furniture restoration
business (Anton's Upholstery), having successfully owned
and operated his business for 35 years Mrs Anton is the
former clerk -treasurer of the City of New Richmond, Ui
Mr and Mrs Anton have already successfully restored two
historic homes in New Richmond, including the former
Governor Knowels' mansion
It is the intention of Mr and Mrs Anton to obtain a
special use permit for the aforementioned property for
the following reason
Mr and Mrs Anton, in conjuction with their daughter,
Susan Drury wish to operate the proposed property as
a Bed & Breakfast facility, according to the restoration
guidelines determined by the Heritage Preservation
Commission and in full compliance with the Stillwater
Code Section 31 01, Subdivision 4 (9) and Subdivision 25
(F)
The residence will be operated in strict compliance with
the community guidelines, including but not limited to
the following facts which denonstate the interest in
harmonizing with the immediate neighborhood
The home would be offering only 3 guest rooms on a pre
reservation basis
II
The residence is located within walking distance to down-
town Stillwater, encouraging walking tours and downtown
patronage
Page Two
•
The residence is to be owner -occupied by Susan Drury who
will at all times be responsible for the maintance of
respectable noise levels and community harmony
Ms Drury has proven experience managing a Bed & Breakfast
facility, having worked for the Rivertown Inn and Cover
Park Manor for a period of one year At which time, Ms
Drury left to pursue purchase of this proposed family
owned and operated Bed & Breakfast
All particular details relative to site plan and diagrams
are included as attachments to this application
Most importantly, Mr and Mrs Anton and family demonstrated
an enduring commitment to preservation of the valued
historic treasures, irreplaceable to the greater community
of the State of Minnesota and the St Croix River Valley
The Anton/Drury family have clearly demonstrated their
meticulous and stringent historical accuracy in the restor-
ation of the former Governor Knowles' mansion
The wish to pay homage to the spirits of the pioneers and
forefathers such as James Mulvay who built this original
home so long ago in 1890 to cradle the new generation of
Americas children
The Anton/Drury family wishes, indeed promises, to honor
the historic house at 704 1st St So , not only as a place
to provide a warm rest and refreshing meal to the cultural
tourists visiting their history in Stillwater, but intends
to carefully maintain this property, which has been home
to ancestors of Minnesota for over one hundred years The
spirits of the children raised in this home, from the family
with 11 children, 5 of whom grew up to become catholic priests,
to the Colemans or Pichardsons of the 19th century, should
all be at peace with the knowledge that their home will be
certainly maintained with love and devotion into the next
generation
•
•
704 1st St South
Proposed 3 guest Bed & Breakfast
Conformity to Oriaance #768
1 Zoning The property is presently in the RB
zoning district allowing a Bed & Breakfast
establishment by special use permit
2 Distance from exsisting Bed & Breakfast establishments
The closest existing Bed & Breakfast is the Heirloom
located on the corner of 3rd St South and Hancock
This would be approximatley 6 blocks away or 1800
lineal feet
3 Serving of Liquor on premises
This proposal will not involve the serving of either
liquor or wine
4 Lot and home size requirements
This home is located on Lots 1,2 and the N1/2 of Lot 3
Blk 2, Churchill Nelson Slaughter Add measuring 135
ft x 104 ft square consisting of 14,040 square ft
minimum requirement for a 3 guest room being 10,000
sq ft
The home presently consists of 4 bedrooms with a total
interior square footage of approximately 3,154 square
feet It is proposed and felt that the unique floor
plan of this home can facilitate 3 guest rooms comfort-
ably, since approximately 80% of the premises can be
utilized as guest space Please refer to the following
pages for detailed interior measurements
5 Inspections and license requirements
This proposal would include conformancy to all state,
county, and local regulations Including proof of
building, fire and planning inspections, application
and obtaining of county Bed & Breakfast license and
state sales and use tax number
/QL/J
3+i ee+ 3cuf h
•
/lcLiA) Floor
yL) ll =1,
z
3
0
0
Q
J
-c
d
s4
7,
00
b
L
DINNIAt4 A60_M _
/y'6
LLP
l\
c
„.,#PY .coyei
k+che,lJ
z.
/ Jr
oo
M
L,V,A) Root' —__
/6'G"
PARLocc.R
4.
Frio AJ4-
ON+^ Y
•
_ 709 16+ 5+fcd+ Sa u+h
and Floo ti.
7q":l'
VraA1 4
r
9
oo
tab
/3ed000M _-
•
-- — / p'/o
•
u 3
0 +�
04W.Le/Dery
/o' /0''
XL(
91/0"
1
C Jose
lose + 'y6'10'I
l3edr'oot-4t
/3'/0''
,,o/,9A r
t aso
704 5+ s_fpcei- S4Lt -h
3 rd
XI/ ii
Poo
•
yy,
•
•
/0' y"
kn
5
0
GA
fZi
I
,9 —
S howe r
Becl Doom
/0
/Do,y.i er
70L/70 1-1 534- + 50(,+h
•
•
5c0.. I e 1 " O0'
Pnesem- S1 h+ ole+0.11
h
I�
0
s vim.
•
•
a9 b'r
1 I
'* I
Flow nr"�
C re-b
Pore- h
CFI uert
Crab
5+
Sa
- - -
H J' >
/
- re
spr,.ce
•
•
•
7O-/ 1 s+
ca I e 1 "= 0 0'
S�-ree+ 50 EA+ h
/9apoSeol Si h+ ofe+ai 1
show//79 Adpsed P1901-in /4/4ril
Cl—C)
FIo.r na
crab
Its
`o
11,
, 9,ee
99
Porch
';, I F1661.1, 5
ICrtib d
I I
I,E-I
I�
t1
I
I I
II
vih
Spruce
JOY'
_ 709 15+ Stree+ 30u+h
a-e Floo-
• 7y : -L ,
Pioposed ^08,i+hroot -upd A +ens
2
Q
/
Al (� , ,, 3
b5' 1 1 tf�i1
T
Cl
glycodd Pp Vade
.A4_h
•
I
,Qed(1oo K
00
- - - - ia'/0 - - - - - -
2
3
0
v
Locire c(
0 r 1 N41
t DooR
Pro pa3ed Pr'vR4e _BAIA_
- /0 /0''
wi
C lose+
m
I
iv qv'
vI
-- iG, y ,,
Privkie
Acc es.)
Close- a x6'10't
-1 i
I3edPoo 1-1
1
, oi, 9 x r
I
1aroID
/3'/Di' -
I
•
•
•
•
v
"44 1
L--
""'
fl71 „
2H-Ot55.*"'
-
'12,1;=e)rf',—*,
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No SUB/PUD/95-2
Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995
Project Location Tuenge Drive and Shelton Street
Zoning District Duplex Residential
Applicant's Name Paul Schaefer
Type of Application Subdivision/Planned Unit Development
Project Description
The proposal is a 37 lot (36 residential lot and 1 wetland lot) planned unit development A 37 lot
subdivision is a part of the planned unit development request The lots are designed to have a zero lot
line on one side and minimum 10 feet on the other side - 20 feet from the adjacent residence The
residential Tots range in size from 5 386 to 20,098 sq ft Five Thousand square feet minimum is required
in the Duplex Residential District R B The lot frontage range from 66 feet for corner Tots to 46 feet
typical for interior lots
A commercial center is located to the south of the project A fence and evergreens screen the
commercial site from the residential site Vacant land is located to the east and the Forest Ridge
Development across Tuenge Drive to the west The proposal project is a similar subdivision
configuration as the Forest Ridge Development
The project plans were referred to Public Works for review and comment Their comments include the
need for a grading/drainage/erosion control plan particularly around the wetland and street and the
grading impact on lots 3 - 4, 6 - 7 and 17 18, 19, 20 Also, the engineer is recommending that the
combined curb cut for two driveways be limited to 25 feet and the cul de sac radius be increased to 55
feet minimum
One tree is required to be plated for each lot
Park dedication requirements for the land have previously been provided through land dedication
A 50 foot setback is required for the designated wetland (not provided for in plan)
As a result of these comments, the subdivision may need to be modified and result in the loss of lots
Recommendation
Approval of concept approval for PUD
Approval of preliminary plat subdivision with conditions
Conditions of Approval
1 The combined driveway fro each structure shall be 25 feet maximum
2 The cul de sac radius shall be 55 feet minimum
3 A grading/drainage/erosion control plan shall be submitted for staff review before council
consideration of the concept PUD or preliminary plat (this may result in the loss of lots)
4 An outlet shall be provided for the wetland
Attachments
Application and plans
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Case No
Date 42
Fee Paid 'ffgOO
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other Pre -Sub -division
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
FEE
$1900.00
$1,900 00
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
X No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting maten
with any application
Address of Project Tuenge Dr $ 6 1 rst bt No
Zoning District R2 Description of Project Plat land area into .36 Twin -Home
and one Out -lot
\\.\l:\ 4151
*O Q.
D
Lo c. o.t% ts,
etbnAN niZction
1.
u903. 2 ��✓
Assessor s Parcel No 0 9 0.3 j 2 3 5 /? .7 \-t'
I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my
knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
Property Owner Schaeter Development
Mailing Address 2 5 81 Co Ra 7 4
St— C ud, Mn 56301
TelephoNo 6 2- 2 5 2 -7 345
Signature
Th
Any decision made on this proposal ca
5,000 +
Lot Size (dimensions) x sq ft
Total Land Area 7 2 Acre s
Hight of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
.Date of Public Hearing is ,Tanuary 9, 1995
Representative Schaefer Development
Mailing Addres _ 5 81 Co Rd 7 4
Clou. Mn_ 56.3U 1
Telep one No : 1 2-2. '-7345
Signatur
be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action
Total Floor Area sq ft
Proposed floor area sq ft
Building Coverage sq ft
Paved Impervious Area sq ft
Number of off street parking spaces
I
1
1
I
APPEALS
BUILDING MOVING PERMITS
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
GENERAL BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND/FLOOPLAIN
DESIGN PERMIT
GRADING PERMIT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ON SITE SEWER PERMIT
SITE ALTERATION PERMIT
VARIANCE
1-� VEGETATIVE CUTTING PERMIT
I
I_ j
ZONING AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
OTHER
Record of Action on Application
Decision Authority
Date of Action
Decision by Authority
Appeals Period (date)
Appeal Filed (date)
Appeal Scheduled (date)
Appeal Decision Authority
Apeal Decision Approved Denied Date
Decision Complete (date)
61ST STREET NORTH
•
1
40
0
LiJ
0
Z
LiJ
40
6t,2;638 03
Le100
To50 g365
66 01
7 44 46 01
- r
1-r
1
46 01
1
1
1
46 01
46 01
0
0 8
-J
14
15
O
46 01
46 01
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
46 01
46 01
7
N
0
LJ
16 0 17
0
46 01
O 46 01
1 1 1
0 50 100 150
o IRON MONUMENT SET
o IRON MONUMENT FOUND
BEARINGS ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM
121 93
IN
a
I�
c o
0
5
46 01
46 01
46 01
18
46 01 1
L---
0 19
46 01
0
21 05
cn
0
4
67 36
4
r �6 61
y6
L �� -
23 45
22 51
r\e
0
29
46 01 _
6%34 -7
/
—77
/
//...
21
N
0
N
L=32 01
2a6R 0 � ,
XI$TINC EA.aAENT UNin
N In
I
I
46 01 49 98
46yQ1_
41
LOT AREA
LOT 1 8003 SO FT
LOT 2-4 5659 SQ FT
LOT 5 14C98 SO FT
LOT 6-10 5981 SQ FT
LOT 11 10 750 SO FT
LOT 12 8638 SQ FT
LOT 13-17 5981 SO FT
LOT 18-19 6303 SO FT
LOT 21 5842 SQ FT
LOT 22 7949 SQ FT
28 II
L
LOT 23 9110 SO FT
LOT 24 6390 SQ FT
LOT 25 4948 SQ FT
LOT 26 10 744 50 FT� I N C to
LOT 27 19 661 SO FT
LOT 28 9733 5Q FT
LOT 29 20 0098 SO FT
LOT 30 12 741 SO FT
LOT 31-36 5953 SQ FT
LOT 37 8508 SQ FT
46 01
65 121
1,0 80
EME
1.PROPOSED
UNE
/
•
19 9
q /4361ADp Fr
C- \
137,01 \.
01
+/-
o
cn
w
LAND SUR\(L1'ORS
Ro ST CL6UD
MIN ESOTA
11sSOCIAS
1513 WEST ST GERMAIN
ST CLOUD MN 56301
PHONE (612) 253-9495
FAX 253-8737
BUILDING SET BACKS
NOTE
TWIN HOMES WHICH WILL REQUIRE VARIANCES
FROM STANDARD 30 FOOT FRONT YARD SET BACK
TO 25 FOOT FRONT YARD SET EA(K ARE
LOTS 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 do 29
30 FOOT FRONT YARD
10 FOOT SIDE YARD
25 FOOT REAR YARD
30 FOOT CORNER SIDE YARD
•
F-L SNAKES
Fours C9-) tzg&'D
rAIPITED PANEL
SIM 5-T`tLE TO EKtST
•
•& 1 & ROT-W
—_ op E-wn�ow s)
-Area ' 6t6t119 It\inwpfL,
oF bt 2fNt �-;-
- o (1) h1&N5 ge6' o
•
AIrVe
�1
.„2d-1°C
eta. w65 Ei. ft\ . - nA 1 N STF E1
y2= I'-o
z4
e y
exvisbeD
•
•
•
J
‘916(c)4S7M'
c r¢am ccle,
lam/
\u i(
1
/
0}�_
HO1-2iz LisP cePA2
51O1Ncy
EI
11_tvI1
erismpoestf
1GPi dLQOVl1L
(ELM SN &1
Fou rz (9-)
MAIKITE. D F'AOEL Shari
511.4 STYLE TO Ext<,T
I&l1 1\WITh
-- N5ON 6164,t t-
ANT Ipf�
h'� op ht 04>ZINb
LD�Vf✓R- FAST -EVP�l -1 - wATag
7Fu 17 ' iEaN kT INTEP-I aft
•
•
MC.N
yr
w 1 cooler \`
woKW
ri
t
p,>A.IGRi tl 5..l4H /roT wAst1
C HotMLIJT
L— -I� ❑IF_ -Ie=1
ehl<E r_Y / Cisp Er<
ICE. c r en '
Lii
r r"
I 1 t0 OIr O A 1)I l.. „fill
IIJI_I
11 _Int 1.111°o00005%- O�i°1n.I_Io u t OTIII'LII(11,(�_
A
Iv
FOR.JJ ITUr E / EgUtT'I"IEtJT ?LA/4 - MAW LEVG-L (&) SEAT, -`
/4- I o
- o Pert To PELovJ
t</
CDN AI McIJTL,
Meet• vlr11r1ca
24 5EM+
of 1J 7D peLow
MLEvE-L FUR- w'To E 'DL&(z4) 5Ear6
%43' ti 0°
•
&WVIvcaarsvlxcw.e
REVISIONS
PRINTED
W Jtyl imwsssimnat ons a-n w-sIns
— %AIM ' irccl
The Design
Department Inc
119 North
Fourth Street
Suite 204
Minneapol s MN
55401
612 3751643
MEMORANDUM
•
TO Joint Comprehensive Plan Task Force Members
FR Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA January 6, 1995
RE UPDATED GUIDEPOST DOCUMENT
Attached is a revised guidepost document The planning commission will tentatively meet on
January 23, 1995, to discuss the comp plan and receive the township report if it is ready
•
•
•
•
RESULTS FROM STILLWATER/STILLWATER TOWNSHIP
JOINT TASK FORCE MEETINGS
Guideposts for Joint Planning
The following policies and principles were discussed and considered by the joint task force as
planning guideposts for cooperation between the city and township
The guideposts are the result of six -months of meetings and discussion and reflects a consensus
of direction, although neither the City of Stillwater nor Stillwater Township have officially
endorse the statements
Overall Planning
Determine the desired growth rate and phasing of urban services to accommodate planned for
growth as needed for the urban -rural transition planning area (URTPA) for the 25-year planning
period 1995 - 2020
NOTE The urban -rural transition planning area (URTPA) is the area west of
Stillwater currently in Stillwater Township bordered by Dellwood Road (TH 96),
on the north, Manning Avenue (CR 15) on the west and Highway 36 on the south
This area represents the ultimate future planning area for the City of Stillwater
Skeleton Framework
New development will respect the environmental framework of the plan This framework
includes wetlands, woodlands, windbreaks and sloped areas
Natural drainage systems shall be used in new development areas to promote the recharge of
water tables and to reduce the speed and amount of run off
Views from major public roads of new development in the URTPA shall be screened by existing
vegetation and land forms, new landscaping, wetlands and greenways Major public roads
include Dellwood Road, Manning Avenue, McKusick Road, Boutwell Avenue and Highway 36
Any new non-residential development shall be buffered from all adjacent residential uses,
connected by trails to residential areas and appear visually subdued in a landscaped setting as
viewed from public roads
Design new subdivisions to minimize through traffic and when necessary design neighborhood
collector streets with greater setbacks, landscaping and pedestrian and bike trails
Create new neighborhoods in city growth areas that retain elements of Stillwater's small town
1
•
•
identity, appearance and character
Develop special design guidelines and performance standards using the planned unit
development process to implement visual screening, park, open space and trailway and natural
resource policies
Available Areas for Development
There are approximately 500 acres of vacant land in the URTPA to be developed at either
township and city densities
Preserve historic resources and unique land forms in growth area to maintain elements of the
areas past and provide and identity to new development
Park, Recreation, Open Space Development
Develop an overall trail system for the URTPA areas that connects new residential development
areas to existing and proposed trials on McKusick Road, Myrtle Street and County Road 5 and
connects all residential areas in the URTPA from Dellwood Road to 62nd Street
New residential development areas should include desirable design elements from existing city
neighborhoods including a mix of housing types, landscaped streets, accessible neighborhood
parks and open space areas and a unique neighborhood images
Require new development to provide 10 percent of the development residential land area or its
equivalent for neighborhood (7 percent) and community parks (3 percent)
City/Township Land Use
Try to locate within the planning area an elementary school site, 10 acres, and community park,
25 acres (Good planning in either case )
Require a detailed environmental assessment of physical site conditions including plant and
animal communities, topography, soil, drainage and wetlands before land development planning
begins
Density
Use new development concepts, where appropriate, such as mixed use development and cluster
housing, to provide life cycle housing opportunities, minimize the need for and use of the
automobile and maintain open space
Use ghost platting and cluster development to allow some initial growth with the opportunity for
•
•
•
urban density development in the future when desired and planned
Establish lot size and other development standards for the URTPA areas in the township that
accommodate future urban development according to the Stillwater comprehensive plan
If new residential development areas are developed at city densities, design elements from
existing city neighborhoods including a mix of housing types landscaped streets, accessible
neighborhood parks and open space areas and unique neighborhood images
Coordination and Implementation Structure
Establish Joint Planning Board to coordinate planning between the City of Stillwater and
Stillwater Township so both city and township plans for the URTPA are consistent
Use orderly annexation agreements , joint power agreements and municipal urban service area
extension agreements to coordinate and implement comprehensive plan growth phasing policy
Elements of these agreements may include
- Defining a rural taxing distnct so existing residents will be protected from unreasonable
taxes
- No adverse economic affects to existing township residents by MUSA extension into the
URTPA for urban development
- Establish 5-year planning periods for overall growth phasing
- Any implementation of Comp Plan for the URTPA shall have input from the township
and city
Key Planning Concepts for URTPA
The following key planning concepts provide direction for the preparation of the comprehensive
plan The concepts will be a part of the comprehensive plan for the city and township and shall
be used to guide special area planning
Greenways/Open Space Definition
Greenways shall be established along Manning Ave, Dellwood Blvd, Myrtle Street, McKusick
Road and Boutwell Drive The greenways shall be 100 - 200 feet in width depending on the
location and site conditions The purpose of the greenway is primarily to preserve the natural
semi -rural character of the transition area by screening new development from major public
roads The greenway shall appear informal and natural using native indigenous plant material
adapted to existing topographic conditions Enhancement of existing topographic or vegetative
i
•
i
conditions is encouraged to the extent the enhancement appears natural Wetland mitigation sites
may be used as part of the greenway Pathways may be located along side or in the greenway but
not appear as a primary design element of the greenway The green way will provide a landscape
separation between newly developing residential areas and high volume traffic corridors
Trailways, Parks and Open Space Areas
Trailways, neighborhood and community park and open space areas will be provided throughout
the URTPA The extensive Brown's Creek Wetland systems shall provide the framework for
park and open space resources preservation in the north portion of the transition area Long Lake
and existing woodlands and windbreaks shall be used in the southern portion of the site for trail
locations An overall system of trails connecting new neighborhoods from Dellwood Blvd to
62nd Streets shall be planned along wetlands, new natural drainage ways and wooded areas
Within neighborhoods pathways shall conveniently connect residents to neighborhood park and
open space areas separated from auto traffic Any active community park, convenience
commercial use or school site shall be clearly connected to surrounding residential areas by
walkways and bike path, utilize and preserve natural areas for trail locations
Development Pattern and Density
The overall character of the transition areas shall be single family with selected locations of
compact clustered attached housing The existing semi -rural character of the areas north of
McKusick Road (Random Creek) and south of Boutwell (Spring Creek) shall remain with some
in fill at rural densities
Newly developed areas shall be large lot ( 1 to 1 5 dwelling units per acres DU/Acre), small lot
(2 to 3 DU/Acre) or higher density attached housing—al-4 - 6 DU/Acre
Large, lot single family areas are located in areas of sensitive sites Because of topography
wetlands, lakes or timberland conditions the amount of site disruption is limited These areas
tend to be located on steeply sloped or wooded shorelands or adjacent to sensitive wetlands or
open space areas A cluster development concept could work in this area to minimize the impact
on the land
Small, lot single family areas tend to be in areas that are less environmentally sensitive These
sites can be interior to the large lot area or setback form open space areas These sites are the
flatter corn or hay fields of the URTPA The development density of the small lot area is typical
of the existing city
Attached or compact housing areas are located in pockets separated visually and physically from
single family areas These locations have good direct access to major roads and are more closely
tied to existing urbanized areas Sites for compact housing area located on County Road 5, 62nd
near 15 Myrtle Street south and west of Long Lake, possibly McKusick Road (west of
•
•
•
mitigation site) and pockets south of Dellwood Blvd
Convenience Commercial Locations The purpose of this use is to provide services and products
for the surrounding residential areas to reduce auto use The sites should be clearly connected
by pathways to adjacent residential areas, be of a residential scale and style compatible with the
adjacent residential areas
Office park or research and development areas These locations provide a job base for the
surrounding residential areas and tax base for the community These sites should have
convenient access to major roads, be visually and physically separated from residential areas, be
attractively designed and landscaped to fit into the site conditions
The plan will respect current uses as they relate to assessment policy and any required land use
changes
ALTERNATIVE "F"
•
Acres DU
Land Use
Residential
Single Family
Large Lot (1 0 - 1 5 DU/Acre) 98 100-150
Small Lot (2 0 - 3 0 DU/Acre) 265 530-795
Compact (4 0 - 6 0 DU/Acre) 125 500-750
Totals 488 1,130-1,695
•
C \WPWIN60\WPDOCS\RESULTS SR
•
•
•
cXekileAlkeY
ICE CREAM
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission/City Council
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Commission and Council,
My name is Todd Pellizzer Recently, my two brothers and I purchased the Winona Knits
building located at 215 Main Street We have been informed that we will need a special
use permit to operate a retail store there With this letter we would like to request
such a permit for that location
Sebastian Joe s Ice Cream is a family owned and operated business We make all of our
own ice cream in small batches and have been fortunate to win numerous awards Our
menu would -consist of ice cream, coffees and baked goods such as muffins, scones and
cookies
Currently, the two stores we now have are neighborhood meeting places where young
and old can share an ice cream cone and a cup of coffee or cookie We feel that we will
become an asset to the existing retail mix currently in downtown Stillwater We are
noted for being active and concerned members of our business communities Our busiest
time of year would of course be summer We would hope to establish and draw our
customers from the existing Stillwater residents and tourists Because of this we don t
feel we would adversely affect existing traffic patterns or parking allocations There
are no parking spots available other than the parking lot on Water street
We appreciate your consideration of a special use permit for us and look forward to a
mutually beneficial relationship in the future
Sincerely,
Todd Pellizzer
Sebastian Joe s Ice Cream
4301 Nicollet Avenue South
• Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409
824-3461
4301 NICOLLET AVE S , • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55409 • PHONE 824-3461
J
i
4
C
r �-
1
-6-a riti 1 u s - -)2•14
vM %w.�.n
ti • R/'M •.•••.. • 1•i •.
Nor. ... W..x..._...-.
N� 1�I ..__..
.1
yr....� y'4.-N
w ,•
N
1n
a
I
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No SUP/DR/95-3
Planning Commission Date January 9, 1995
Project Location 215 South Main Street
Zoning District CBD, Central Business District
Applicant's Name Todd Pellizzer
Type of Application Special use permit
Project Description
The sign plan for an existing structure at 215 South Main Street and a special use permit for an
ice cream parlor/restaurant
Design Review/Signage
The Heiitage Preservation Commission reviewed the proposal at their regular meeting on
Wednesday, January 4, 1995 They approved the projecting sign for the Main Street face along
with a wall sign for the Water Street face similar to the existing Winona Knits sign The signs
will be black and gold None of the transom area window signage will be included
Special Use Permit
The approximate square footage of the proposed use is 2600 square feet This includes the main
level and mezzanine The building inspector will need to review the use of this level as it relates
to the building codes
The parking demand for the restaurant use is 21 spaces Parking is limited in the immediate area
of the downtown and the public lots It cannot accommodate all the demand for parking In the
future, if additional parking lots are constructed in the downtown, property owners will need to
assist the city in providing these facilities
Findings
The proposal meets the intent of the downtown Design Guidelines, Sign Ordinance and Zoning
Ordinance
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Conditions of Approval
1 All employees shall park in public permit parking lots
Attachments
Application
Plans
Lettei
Photos
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No
60//9
Date /d' ?
Fee Paid
le 6e-
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
•with anv application
Address of Project c,7/5 /1d//✓ er Assessor's Parcel No /t6f2 — 230 0
Zonj...nz District Description of Project 4'/'%Oe0E (.- c7��� C" CJ
_A et C E u `► ? //iir .^7 ,,,_,A" F ri= c�c, se-c.) v'£
•
I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects
knowledge and belief true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
Property Owner <4' 6" frj
'" " "`G�c rt' £
Mailing Address 4'3C/ /‘./( c 7- ac-/
/V/0/.s, /-9 - SS` 7
Telephone No & /2 - e5.24 - 3'/E /
Signature /' c-f—A-47/ �
to the best of my
r/�ii'"
Representative /�= �v" ZZf
Mailing Address #v30/ Ai' /£7 UJ �`-)
�,b 6 / j1 53-110
Telephone No�(�/.2 �5���'' �6 /
Signatures / �-,����`YY'
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action
Lot Size (dimensions)) '2' x /20 s ft
Total Land Area r/�i �/9t'
Hight of Buildings Stori��e/ss Feet
Principal :2 %4
Accessory A_)""1"L
l36,
Total Floor Area ,37sq ft
Proposed floor area 2.31(c sq ft
Building Coverage 237( sq ft
Paved Impervious Area sq ft
Number of off street parking spaces
Date of Public Hearing is
metal BRINES
0 i00
lig
erd,Sk "
-4 4.01
, •
e =
200
1" = 200'
400
600
DA -IF OF PHOTOGRAPHY APRI1 1991
800
f*
f„. 4
1,"4.'74,41#442,
•
"4"41:2,.. " • '
,`,",',.****..**,,,r-tt5,-*
TX"-r*,04011,44
5.,A;r4
s
4
WASHING ON CO6NTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE
MINNESOTA
OUTLOT C
300
100 /00
2
51
298.09
:7* f""*","*"-• 41'4'
•
4:-
,
JO 5
503
r
404,-= • ‘,!"1,*-t
OUTLOT
v!,
RECTIFICATION BASED ON
-
TARGETED CONTROL POINTS
0
PAUL E. WELLEN & ASSOCIATES,
z
0
'ON 2SNZOI7
0')
CD 0 CD CD W
Nglil
H CI 0 H
L) h..) H. to CO
hl hi(TlhiMPI 2t Z
§ § § § -61 Z N.) 43 M W
0 0 1-3 0
8 .('-1 il En NJ tn
1 d 0 in
it r4
M H
tcl . '71
oq )V Nj Cj (1
0 • CD W
H 65 65 PP Pq
d G7 EA Iv hi OC
01 LW C) gp H
r4 'n 8 1
hi
0 10
st,NEChi <
N) 0 En
' " t1
''.). E
fin
VD
4-3
0 8 c.
xi
cc
En /4
trj zjs
<
1-1 0
4-3 en
H
tKI Pci
Z
c-4 to
cn64-3
)..c)
5
(-)
0
0 H H
Z H H 0
F3 I?) 2 F3 1C
(/) 0
Hi btijj
iCjdZ
H Wt11011010
in 0 Ht0o-
rn Z 70. 0 0 r3
h3 C) m) hl 1-3 uo
g tg CD
Z H C)
•
0 hi
"
5 01
0-4 R 8 ta
H H 0 ›,
1-3 Z'-<tiCI
(")
' 11
0
r.
0.
-
01
rr
0
xi
0
0,
1J
13
0
0(
6'
rt
(t)
c)
0
en
m
et
rt
rr
0'
PI
0
(D
0
0
r.
a
01
12' )
, rn
t.c1
01'•
.4 0 0, co
0' rt 1-•
2
m
m z 0
h 0 co rt
lel PI- 3. KD
th m c
n m
a H. M rt
10
ID h
0 M
'1(3.
M 0 to
n ro• hom
o n
m t h
a m H.
M "4 0
O.
ho
r- F" 0 1•5
g g
8 0 ID H
tt. 0 0
5. 1- g PJ )
17.• 0 4 7
0 0 I-•
m 0 NJ
00161
M 0 Lc
et rt 0
0 D. 0'
M (0 Z
0
CL ri 4
m o m
0 m 7
-
NJ
P 74
F. 0.1
tS 4 0 0
7 ID 4
Cm
sl 0 0
0% M
rt 0 P
7 • 1-"
(0 3.
0 to
0 (-'0
ts)
P. 0
M t•
H
(l) 10
01''
(11
lu 0. 0
tr C
(t
pua qsaa
t•-•
It)
to 0
hi 7' 0
P1 ft. (-1,11.
1-• O. 11)
0
e0
0 (1)
z
et 0
0 h
rt
()
••••••••••••0..."....
0J CJ NJ
Ln un
NJ 0 0...)
N.)
1-4
C...)
4n.
to) Ul
£ 0
(010,
01
(0(10
0
10
31
F1
0
htt
Cn
L-1
0
o
CD
0
cn
1-3
0
• (.: .' f_1::,,,--;.
' 1 '
2 ',...
. „ 7 1
/ •-"-7-‘9,--;•:- , (:.:3-', (
to Z o rt rt n o
c e o- c.
n m c 0
o et 0 rt 7 a (00.
7 rr n 1•••
CL
W 11 P 0 C
t. I-, Pr, Z M 13
4 LO hA I 0 01
m:re. thZ U5
0 00000 0 M
et (10 hh M
0 51 ft LI
LA 115 M rt - 03 7 •-1
05 I ID 7 I-- up LJ X
1.-. E Ri 0 0 t,
.
a fll O. 1-• C 4
01-4
0 41M 0. I-D". Z
o
eu I-
i-,
M 4 7 .<
is, h ID ('1 01
M 0 H M h
ID fD 6 0 rd o (0(0 o--cAt...,
rt
0 n .a.
0' 1-, et
h. X"
1,5 7 Ai
Af htf
0 5-1 1.-, 0 X CD 0
0 tl -.1 hi P. I-. 9
LA 0
0 0 "R. 2 5' 13 !:
0 A'ID P C 0 c 5. .8
m .... 0 M 0
F" M .
l U; Mr
a10 ih
00 ;t9Z7 oo: 0 C 6 05
5.1 AI
er .•4
7
tri
rj
ZSP
4s
rt
0
rt
0
re
61
••••
21
M to M
0 ID 4
0 n
0 0 0
fl 0 0
In O.
(1(61
14 4
P. X
M 0
rt ri•
M X
I-, M
TaTTeJed qaa;
rt
3.
21
rt
21
a
61
0.
ID
51
5.1
61
CA
0
11)
01
H. a 4-• rt.
va t.
n 0
m N
0 ft
M. ID 11
0. 0 0
X o-
M H
fD
(00.0.
salnuTw
0
0
61
o.
0
ro
0
10
3.
00—ES9 auTI
ID
ID
4aa; ET-ZSZ auTT 4sam
ID z
m 0
n n m
m
r• W V
0. 0
it 0 h
r•
hi 0'
rt Ch rt
I
M 0
o
i-t,
m
1<
;TPH 4saM
0
LA
0.
m
('1 51
3E
n m
Nri
0 7 H
0 H.
61 7
MU' ; Lj: •Or'CL'
0(00(00101
'1.010 7 rt. rt
a m
o
0100 m M
P. E o
0.0110601
o 7 4
o - 10
C
7 0 Ul CA 0
M Ul 51
11
C rt
0 0 9 fD
It 7 M IA
ID O. 0
KD n
tr o
m m
n
rr el ID (0
h
4 0 61
et
o
0161
H.
CL n
0
c
ID :3
a
(0
t'
0 z
et
21
ID
4sam144nos
et
0
;o aouaqsTp P
7 Ll 61
M W n
0 m
c z h, 0
m m • 0 0 )0
51 IA CD X 1 C
(0(00-1(00101
ID 0-1-1
11 h, rt
F- M M CL IDD ID M M
M rr Z
0 C) 0
MOtu hh
n r.
0210'
M rt)
2110 Co 0.
Z •.0
0 rt 0,
Pi 01 CL
et M M
7 0 4 eh
rr to h 0
CD 0 M
C rD
0) 0 w 0
CL h- 7
ID htt Lc, IA
10
0 ..
h o r.
m n
qsaatnnos ato,
;o Ja4aen0
Ln
o rn
cn
0
qsamqqnos atp
'EE uo74,DaS
L.)
Z
w £
• LA
0 X
E
D 1-
m 0,
H. 0
AD H.
0
0
11
01
21
(0061
(I en
0
10
rr
-elosauuTw
0)
0
1-3
Orj
cn
0
;IPH qsaa atp
KD
rt
01
ID
(11
(10
01
00
0
c
61
lsam aql Jo JTE-1 4sP3 a41
lseaqqnos agq
0
0'
11
0
rt
ID
0
0
ID
lc)
31
61
61
H 0
H
En Pi
H
1-3
0 0
Z Z
1-30
1-3
Cn
1-3
11J
HL-4
Z H
0
(z) Z
0
1-11
1-<
H En
tj
0
0
Z
pj
v)
g: I
:1 I
in" I
>101
r-
lz
I min
(ow
CO'
14*'
bo
0
(-)
H
tri
cn
7J
F-3
Grailip I aNI SSIM
H tKi
zZtll
0 H
H C)
H Z
)>.
'-11
1-3 0-1
`..1)
:IJ
:11
H
Z 0 1-4
H 0
P00.
C-4
1-3 0
H
ZIi
ZH
0 0
4.". ti
0 0 (11
C-1 1-3 Cn
0 (/)
H
t RO
0 En
tri
cn
m
1
0)
,9•17.66' N
1 Co
i
0
cn
N 01°13' 58" W
WEST UNE OF THE E1/2 W1/2 SE1/4 SW1/4
S 01°14' 11" E
451.00
WEST LINE OF THE NORTH 300.00 FEET ...............
OF THE SOUTH 350.00 FEET W1/2 E1/2 SE1 /2 SW1/4
chi
0
0
1
L
01
N 01°14'17" W
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS
'OS 90L'6Et
0
0
0
fn
r3
1
'OS IOO'OL
1-3
0 0 0
H
CD 01 4,
VD I-, 03
N
"el:\
35 O. 0 0
'9
C,
451.00
0
................ ........
H
0 c0O0000000O0O0O00000O0
4-3HHHHHHHHHH1-34-31-31-3•-31-31-30-30-30-31-3
LO LO Lo hi IV N5 hi hi hi hi hi NJ I-, t, t, CA Ln ho
1-3 r, c7 VD CO .4 ch tri 4, LO hJ t, C) CO LO hi t, I I
1 i I
h, 1-4 0
1-1 ch
sIou aasoamia ao
'ia 'OS SOL'69E
Ch I-, hi t, t,
01 03 tn NJ CD 4 VD CD Ln 01 VD -A
CN Ln VD .4 CD .4 CA Lo Lo (e
hi CD L.) 13. VD 01 CD CO QD .0.
tn oo ho co to 1-' ch ch c) cD (0
En u) m u) u) m m un m En u) u)
0 40 10 /0 10 10 10 10 10 +0 10 10
• 6 • • • • • • • • • •
'11 111 el el 111 hd el hi hi hq hi hi
1-3 1-3 '-30-30-30-30-30-3
1-' 1-'
Ln CA CA Ln CO CD tn tn 03
s .
CO CD Li LO Ch -A Q0 VO CA CD
,3. ,4 CD 00 to tri co Q0 tn c)
h) -.4 to 1-' co c) ho co (0 Lo
En Ui Di In 01 Di Ui Ln En En
10 10 10 tO i0 10 10 io
• • • • • • • • • •
hl hl hi h5) h] 1-1
•-3 1-3 H H 1-3 H 1-3 1-3 1-3
0. • • • • • • • • • • 10 • • • • 6
tl
C'
133A NI 31VOS
0
I I
0
11
m
m
I- s•• •-- I
....4
I 1 1 I .... : -. ....!
1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
_ _i _ _____I _ _i _ .1.. _ L
g ...... _ WEST LINE
.............. EAST 1/2 WEST 1/2
to 4. S 01°13' 48" r .
.0 SECTION 33, T3ON, R2OW
toe* 0 909.28 TOP GAST
93;4 903.69 11-64ERT
1°14' 07" E I (cg
I
I CD
100.94
: o
4-
CD
52,90
-T1
X
IN)
c,3
col
-
Z 0 (.4
rri r--
C rul
1.
Cn0
m
I (11
a)
co G4
4" 0
cn
130.02
130.02
S y6T JF
Nr3E cor UNE
••••
•••••
123.02
1.
•••••1171,
1-'1 1-1 17.
i...1 1 I
Ot".4
1 1 1 I
ONE.. 1 1 !
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
I__I _ _ ____L ____L_----
TUENGE DRIVE
........
............................... (bOCUMENT NUMBER 69a73
128.85 30 30
128.96
0)
- 12104_
g
b
143.
0
129.44
(D 0 C
58.00
EAST LINE OF THE 719.94.
WEST 1/2 EAST 1/2 4,
SOUTHEAST 1/4 SOUTHEAST 1/4
SECTION 33, T3ON, R2OW
44 73 1)
116e
0
z • tzi
A
619.96
S 01°14' 00" E
116.15
11 11 II 11
Lo
0 0
• c7 ..!„ Co
co .17
cn - on
(LL17969 2:13GIVN
99.00
0
70
ISV3HICIOS 3Nfl
3mHinos
169.01 ......................................
3 ,,Lg lgo613 N
111IS AO A110 041
01
094-210