The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-07-10 CPC PacketZoning Zone i r_ 'i L j 9 THE BIRTHPLACE OF MIHHESOTA > July 6, 1989 THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, JULY 10, 1989 AT 7 00 P M IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS Cc CITY HALL, 216 NORTH FOURTIT STREET AGENDA Approval of Minutes - June 12, 1989 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 Case No V/89-37 - Variance to the rear and sideyard setback requirements Lc--anevato an_existing Carriage House into personal living quarters at 306 West Olive Street in the RCM Medium Density Family Residential District Charles and Judith Dougherty, Applicants 2 Case No V/89-38 - Variance to the sideyard and rearyard setback requirements (22 foot corner sideyard, 2 foot rearyard proposed, 30 foot J, corner sideyard, 5 foot rearyard required) for the construction of a garage at 620 West Pine Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Carl B Quist, Applicant 3 Case No V/89-39 - Variance to the sideyard and rearyard setback requirements (two foot sideyard, four foot rearyard proposed, five foot sideyard and five foot rearyard required) for the construction of a garage at 416 North Greeley Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Tom Eichten, Applicant 4 Case No DP/V/89-40 - Design Permit and Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of an awning sign, change copy on canvas sign and add three pennants on the Grand Garage Building at 324 South Main Street The property is located in the CBO, Central Business District Robert Tanner, Applicant 5 Case No SUP/89-41 - Special Use Permit to operate a Latch -Key Program (before and after school child care) at Stonebridge Elementary School located at 900 North Owens Street in the RA, One Family Residential District Independent School District No 834, Applicant 6 Case No SUP/89-42 - Special Use Permit for the placement of two portable classrooms at the Stillwater Senior High School The school is located at 523 West Marsh Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Independent School District No 834, Applicant 7 Case No ZAM/89-43 - Request for consideration of a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone lots 4 and 5 (currently designated 7 and 8) of Dallager's Estates from RB, Two Family Residential to RA, One Family Residential t CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 e t -r L J Planning Commission Agenda July 10, 1989 Page Two 8 Case No V/89-44 - Variance to the Sign Ordinance for additional signs for the new TCF Bank in the Cub Washington Avenue North hthe IP-C, Industrial Park Color Sign Systems, Applicant 0 10 11 Case No SUP/89-45 - Special Use Permit for the Oakridge Community Church, 610 County Road 7#5, Residential District Oakridge Community Church, et Case No SUB/89-48 - Subdivision of three 25lots totre aling w 16 �hOmodgifa re cat eon into two lots of 9,180 square feet and 7,4 t o 1 of—s i ze tall De str� ctat412 Stanl Stanley andBEWest zabethkins McDonal McDin the onald, scants' Two Family Resident Case No V/89-46 - Variance to the sideyard setback requirements for an ng 2 feet proposed, required) cat 412 W Streetest Wilkins in the RB, Two FamiyResidential District Stanley and Elzabeth McDonald, Applicants (Refer to SUB/89-48) the placement of two Foods Store, 2001 Commerical District placement in the RA, Applicant of a new sign at Single Family 12 Case No V/89-47 - Variance to the sideyard setback requirements (2 feet • proposed, 5 feet required) for the construction of a 16 foot by 22 foot singlewo car garage Stanley and ElizabethMcDonald, Applicants WStreet ilkins n the T(Referl ly Residential Resididential Des SUB/89-48) 13 Case No PUD/89-50 - PUD, preliminary plat approval for a subdivision containing 42 e RgB, Twos Fam°lyson 61st ResidentialrDestrictrectly behind Greeley Parlay Group (Richard Square) in the , Ernst II), Applicant 14 Case No SUB/89-49 - Subdivision request for forty two single family lots, with a zero theRB, TwosetbFamilyf new 61st Residential reet District re ctly behind Greeley DistrictParlay Group (Richard Square) in Ernst II), Applicant 15 Continuation of Case No SUB/89-35 - Preliminary Plat approval to subdivide an 8 68 acre lot into two lots of 2 87 and 5 81 acres at the corner of the Northwest cornCrest er of the Industrial al intersection oIndustrial tDistrict on Avenue anCurue Curve Crest Boulevard in Properties, Applicant r a STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Date June 12, 1989 Time 7 00 p m Members Present Gerald Fontaine, Chairman Glenna Bealka Jean Jacobson Judy Curtis Jay Kimble Mark Ehlenz Nancy Putz Rob Hamlin Don Valsvik Steve Russell, Comm Dev Director Members Absent Jean Jacobson Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Judy Curtis to approve the minutes of May 8, 1989 as submitted All in favor PUBLIC HEARINGS • Case No V/89-32 - Variance to the side yard and rear yard setback requirements for the construction of a bedroom addition at 1010 North Fourth Street in the RB, Two family Residential District Billy Jo Elliott, Applicant Ernie Fell, the contractor representing Mr Elliott presented the application The request is to construct a bedroom on the second story of an existing home No expansion of the first story is proposed The Commission found no problem with the application, but a concern was expressed that the home was formerly a gas station, and it is not known whether the gas tanks were ever removed It was determined that a fourth condition of approval be added Testing be done to determine if gas tanks are present, and that they be removed if present Motion by Rob Hamlin to approve the variance request with four conditions Mark Ehlenz seconded Motion carried 8-0 Case No V/89-33 - Variance request for the placement of an awning over a deck at Popeye's on the River (Stillwater Yacht Club), 422 East Mulberry Street Greg Lindow and Bob Marois presented the application • The application submitted to the Planning Commission for its consideration was for a temporary retractable awning over the deck The applicants stated their intent was an application for a seasonal, removable awning The awning would be used throughout the summer for protection from the sun as well as from rain 1 19 • • Stillwater Planning Commission June 12, 1989 There was further discussion regarding the discrepancy, and it was determined that the Commission should consider the application as it was written The awning would fit within the Bluffland/Shoreland Ordinance and the DNR guidelines only if it was retractable Motion by Rob Hamlin that the variance request be approved as written (a retractable awning to be used in inclement weather) with five recommended conditions of approval Nancy Putz seconded Motion carried 7-0, Don Valsvik abstained Don Valsvik made a motion that the Planning Commission recognize that the previous motion was not the intent of the applicants Rob Hamlin seconded Motion carried 8-0 Don Valsvik made a motion that the Planning Commission recognize that the applicants' intent is for a seasonal awning and that approval would be indicated if it meets all requirements of the DNR and the Bluffland/Shoreland Ordinance Mark Ehlenz seconded Motion carried 5-3 Case No SUB/89-35 - Applicant requested continuance Case No SV/89-34 - Street Vacation request for the remaining portion of Oak Street between Grove and Hemlock Streets Gerald Caldwell and John Doyle presented the application The Commission recommended that there be a pedestrian easement as a second condition of approval Mootion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Mark Ehlenz that the Street Vacation request be approved with two conditions as stated Motion carried 8-0 OTHER BUSINESS Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Glenna Bealka to approve a resolution for modification to Development Program and Development District #1 regarding Brick Pond Economic development district Motion carried 8-0 Motion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Don Valsvik to recommend that the City create an Ordinance prohibiting parking on grassy areas and green spaces downtown and that the City Council direct the Police Department to enforce the Ordinance Motion carried 8-0 Motion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Mark Ehlenz to adjourn the meeting at 8 40 p m All in favor Submitted by Shelly Schaubach Recording Secretary 2 • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO V/89-38 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION 820 West Pine Street APPLICANT'S NAME Carl B Quist COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT Two Family ZONING DISTRICT RB TYPE OF APPLICATION Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Variance to the sideyard and rearyard setback requirements for the cu tzt--uctlon -of a -garage DISCUSSION The application is to construct a garage approximately two feet from the rear property line and twenty-two feet from the west sideyard property line The zoning requirements are a five foot rearyard setback and a thirty foot sideyard setback The two car garage will be 22 feet by 24 feet There will be Pnough area on the driveway for additional parking The placement of the existing garage does not allow enough room on the driveway for additional parking The proposed placement of the garage will also allow for more green space on the property There is an alley adjacent to the north property line • so there is nothing within fifteen feet of the proposed garage CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 Run-off from the garage will remain of site or run to the street 2 The only entrance to the driveway shall be from William Street 3 The only lilacs removed, shall be for construction of the garage RECOMMENDATION Approval FINDINGS The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land and the buildings ATTACHMENTS - ite Plan - Building Plans 0 1' ,C 100 Case Number Fee raid ---s--__------- 6 i • Data Filed �_____ PLANNING ADMINIS -RAT IVE F04UI Street Location of Property ---------------------- LQgal Dascript►on of Property; Owner Name _(-- i� iS; Address ti --- Phone Applicant (►f other than owner) Name --------------------------------- Address------------------------------ Phone --------------- Type of Request ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat . Variance ___ Other ___________________ Desc•iption of Req_ uest _0 P-Ui LlD 1� G C-��. t�;'T- • cs1 Q `i_Z2! Ste_ 3 ACC of — ------------------------ Signature of Applicant. Dateof Public Hearing --------------------------------------------- NOTE S.cetc'i of proposed property and structure to be drawn on back oz t"-fornrTorat- tacnea, showing the following/9��r'/ 1 North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 1 3 Dimensions of front and side set -backs �' �;;.� vlr-veS 4 Dimensions or. proposed structureCo 5 Street names 6 Location oz adjacent existing buildings 7 Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho Planning Commission on _________= (date) subject to the following conditions __—________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to thie y • following conditions.--------_____---------------------------------- -------7-------------------------------------- 4 Comments (Use other side), _ - _ W ITN curet ra1T spv-&AC%i:S 1'D CN4Y HAVE /' (3ETW4P'J -ri4r. t>iLc.K 4 SIDA ch'- Nt-a) ChAO.ACmt 1 1 1 f 1 I t 1 I I a l l _ -- -- ---- — _ — I nor 1 c. I tv CI 15's ma/ 3o' FRoNT LING Orkig-tJCf. t 51®Cm1a?' Fr4oNT "I7 l tt •� e_. � ! 71F J 1 r{I 1 a I L i 15�ASPN NL7 FIELT C-ASPi4kLT S6ckLWMW 6HIP &L6m5 2 1&64 TRUS%t% 24 JJ µI�TaL 12.4:>OF f>;bGrL I— M ELTAL. 5Cf-FlT' 0 I 1"x4-` WT STUDS - VZ." LP WARD S14EAT e+ ING► Is* aSI- Ak�.g C-F�LT �CI-Of-ol- LA)h `D # --Al'TlEtJ S J Ih34- (MATC.+1 W005C-- 'IA4 13a FA? ' 1 4"CONC FLbOk 1ALl4 —tea is�IGH�2. @Jl 6 U ' e cG (P+r�y� VU�( ' CW a l r�S * r-- 1 t�r )MC 3 I FIN GtU.vE 4"MIAI S4WoJFILL Qs{ lit, t T'{ Pi C A L WALL ',i.CT 101\1 1 I 11 1 1 II.J _ -_ 11 . 1L L_ i NOIZ744 .7.: L-P--V � i I KW f ' ✓`� {1 r t r T rr rl �7' E a y f Me & MR CA RL ! U I ST - SI I IrL.WAJ+ K MK ` 1 M1 2i i 1 r ,t 1 , 3 1 ti r l� w r tl + 1 y r,r 1 rT P 1 r + , `< sit r F r 1 i � I } Ay 4 1 9 1 YJ ( i t ll wf 1 4 1 1 1 I i 5 rl i rc a+ 1 V , r jtg r 1 ` r aM1 9 4 f 11rtt1 r � � r ,• It y I � 1 t aC.i!cl-i I WcO -- -- t ------�-- 4 +0 N C F Lt? 4, xCv _IU/IO %VI% L Mtrq kLiJf (SIOYi< TO DU-)—) Ito o h 7 o 0VEV.1-{khJ-) vUK) L CONG laVl.U�I I — 1 _T I1 1 ~� III t_ __ — — _— ._. --r^._ I air 4 1 II I it �r Q) ! I 1 � ra r9aJ� 1� V I 1 8 I I r � V a W I i �p l 1 I,y J 1 1 t I 61 f i a ) 1 ?)f Y I 7 I t a n ' C N n � ' t ' 1 I S F LOOIZ 1 1 "LAIN I t+ I FC' 7 i it r r 4 r V ill 3 i I 1 v+� 1 J h y a I Y � i I u ; i ' 1 hll v t !} Y r Er lil a tl F ` w i X 1 {i c IE 7 r t i \ 11 i } S i ti y {T 11 1 1 it 11 II II �� 1{ II 1 I ! rl ' 1 , I , i Ir R 1 r I ! i e FEI i� fl � J1,11LIJ 11,11111 I I I I I I II I I I I I II II I ' I I I I I I I I I I I it II I I I I II I — I I I I I I L_ I I II I � IIII I I � I Ili - L I I I 1 i I I I I I El II I I II I- 1-1EJ III ��I li II I I i� i IIII it I I I �I II I I I I I I I' I -- I I Ili' I I I I III I i I III _l_Li L 1 1 Lf I I _I�= ClI TI I �I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I F::7 �1 == InI i;-►4,1 TT 114 i, 1, ' cv �9 0 lRy LE4AL Dd,%g ►% RoO -ors sir Is ani, 6Bwctc— i /� AS' RecvRXn IN -ME OKIn OE- 'THE- CyUn�Jy RFco2Pt,� WAs"I(Jc)TON (yoopT� I MINN, 2 se*z , � I� I it �I .I I -sue , I � 1 r`1 i� s 1 0 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO V/89-39 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION 416 North Greeley Street COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT RB ZONING DISTRICT Two Family Residential APPLICANTS NAME Tom Eichten TYPE OF APPLICATION Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Variance to the five foot rearyard and sideyard setback requirements for the construction of a garage with a two foot sideyard setback and a four foot rearyard setback DISCUSSION The request is to construct a 241x28' garage on the Southwest corner of the property with a two foot sideyard setback and a five foot rearyard setback The existing garage placement does not allow for expansion or access for a two car garage The proposed space in the yard allows for a larger garage with easier access from Greeley Street CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 The present garage shall be removed from the site 2 Parking will not be allowed in the present driveway 3 All run-off from the garage shall remain on site or run to the street 4 The timber wall must be in place before construction of the garage begins 5 The lilac bushes and shrubs shall remain on the West property line FINDINGS Based on the proposal and existing conditions, the granting of this variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or buildings and that the same is the minimum variance that will accomplish such purpose ATTACHMENTS - Site Plan - Letter from neighbors - Building Plan PAC iao Case Number q00- Fee Paid---.V---____-- G Data Filed - - ---- PLANNING ADMINIS i RAi IVS FOMI � I �L!r _L�=-- ��'_s;cy--------------- -- Street Location of Property __ C Legal Doscriptlon of Property: Owner Name---------------------------------- Addrass ��1.�L_�1s=_1� r41=''_-------- Phone _ Applicant (if other than owner) Name --------------------- Address ----------------- Phone --------------- Type of Request Rezoning Approval of Preliminary Plat ___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Firal Plat Variance --- Other ------------------- Descript,on of Request----- _��--L/ L U�Lt , 1 ----------------------- Signa9 P ture or A plicant.L-----_--- -- --- Date of Public Hearing --------------------------------------------- NOTE sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn on bacx of taus form or at- j tacnea, showing the following 1 North direction. Z Locat.on of proposed structure on lot. t 3 Dimensions of front and side set -backs.+ 7 4 Dimensions or. proposed structure 5 Street names 6 Location oz adjacent existing buildings 7 Other uuormation as may be requestea. 68d 9 Approved ___ Denied __- by the Planning Commission on ----------- (date) subject to the following conditions --- -------------------------------- Approved . ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ sublet: to the following conditions.---------------- ----- ---------- ---------�----- -------------------- ---- --------- ---- --------------------- ------- Comments. (Use other side), I T 63 ,rq N1 • • - i- 7 C L' LL ..�� ,-C ,L1� h� �e 1. c �t ttl«l�e'A e - '.L 'IL tc Q-� C�.�c s �c � �h�.�✓ 1 �L «L} �=�� lc,J G� -+- 4� t �.0 ✓4Q �LQ t c � 4L �L �h de �1�� 7k A—e LLj - ! lrll:red_Ci�CiJ�-� 0 r ' / dC7 o V E,e/NANb _ _ - _ _ -- _ i F f o ✓E �NRNb- ml r8��x4V — ---- —'-- .7� ROcK 4�2A/NAErET L — -,7� I /FT / I - - - - - - - - - --- - \/6- O ✓Q2NAN6 Ov.-AMNlr S/QE V/g / - - - - - /SQ=/FT 8aTt1 S/a65 _ ,S yHMCT2/e L - - ` - - - - - -- _ — .29 - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- --- - - —On Ele/1TEN VIP No 6XEELEY ;I s � ♦ I Ler 7 QateA /A 5A4/N5 A40/TiON LeT SaL Sow i�o 1AL? RA/L fENGE TO AE /NJTA[cE4 ALlNb EAJ7 LINE 4N4 WoRr$ uN[ TO f[tNs of iLeNT PORe// L L \I PAAWAL PE0�AC✓ FENCE TO EE MSTALLEO ALCNb NORT/1 LINE fRew� K NEJT L/NE TO Aiffoa/MATELV /e Fft^f REAM F 11t LJE ' ' 3 /iaL J,OEwAlx6 To 4E eeMirEO ANO Cl✓L ACED w/TN GCAJS ANJ LAN4 SEAJ1Ntr — NEr d/4EL A C FerA FLONT STErl 7r STREET i Z I I ' 644 &ALAbf AN4 W/Md#W WILU 7o 4E fEtjr✓fd (i N4o ✓ELLS TO 4E BLeCCE4 /N) l 014 4,elve +AI To dE 304OE4 ANO LANd 5eAAd I` h i✓rm,E GLANS LNGLa•OE REHOY/Ntr OetjENT QACC ,,TE,�1 lemamA, eE REALAG/bb 4ACC POfCN /0/70 NE a EA'TaIANtE PAP aEST 314E W/Tt/ 0/4EcoALC LEA4/Ntr FfP. TNAT Po/NT To 6A1AbE 7 M 7#7 8d01 ,1 N, a 0 E a 0 v o + T r1 v � Y + 1 17 A -A 0 d ]I e 4 Y T i • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO DP/V/89-40 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION 324 South Main Street COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT Central Business District ZONING DISTRICT CBP APPLICANT'S NAME Robert Tanner TYPE OF APPLICATION Variance and Design Permit PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application to install awning sign at Nelson Street en�rance to Grand Garage, change copy on canvas sign along Main Street and installing three banners on the North side of Grand Garage DISCUSSION Esteban's currently has three signs on the Grand Garage, one is located over the entrance off the west parking lot, a second s a canvas sign hanging from a flag pole along Main Street and a third sign is located on a cnimney above the rear of the building The application is to add a 14 foot awning over the Nelson Street entrance with signage on the lower 18 inch fringe of the awning • on the east, south, and west sides In addition, the request is to change the copy on the front double faced canvas sign The new sign would list other businesses besides Estebans in the Grand Garage This is actually a reduction in signage for Esteban's The third element to the sign proposed is to install three six foot pennants on the north side of the Grand Garage (see attached plans) The ends of the front and back pennants would have graphic designs representing eating establishments DESIGN COMMITTEE REVIEW On June 28, 1989, the Design Review Committee reviewed the request Duane Hubbs indicated the building will probably be in a proposed Downtown Historic District, so care should be taken with signage on the building Commissioners discussed the request with the applicant The applicant indicated that exposure seems to be a problem with the existing business, particularly since the rear parking lot was closed Commissioners felt the proposal was consistent with the building design but felt the number of signs should not be increased The applicant indicated he would be willing to remove the sign from the chimney on the Nelson Street side of the building as a trade off for the awning With this change, the Design Review Committee recommend the application be approved RECOMMENDATION Approval 0 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 The chimney sign shall be removed and chimney repaired 2 The temporary sign on Main and Water Streets shall be removed ATTACHMENT Application and plans Y AC 100 • ti N { Case Number-� � -�6 Q Fee Paid _ � Date Filed _�;r'ef---- PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: Legal-Dascription-of Propertyf Owner Name ___ 't"' Address U_ b Phones Applicant (if other than ownerh Name M_M........... M- Address ' --------------- Phones_ Type of Requests ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat ___/Speual Use Permit Approval of Final Plat � - 1/_ Variance ' --- Other------------------_ Description of Requests 6�.�. /1 �// / � hQ �C /S olc "t= --- ham -- �- -- — —---%—C�------_--- Signature of Applicant. Date of Public Hearing --------------------- NOTE Sketch of proposed roe------------�—�~�--- - • p p rty and structure to be drawn on back of this farm or at. tacaeo, showing the foUowmg• 1. North direction. - z A CZ � 2 Location of propel structure on Iot 3 Dimensions of front and side set -backs. '�J 4. Dimensions of �,'J 6191 M77711c s. Street aasnes PAP°� structure. ti Y-:uvm7ZJ.$,4j,u10 6 Location of adjsemt eadstlng buildissgs.CIIJ 06Y 7. Other information as may be requested. � 686i Nnr 6 Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ______M(c�re� * \\^\ '/7 sublet; to the following conditions: `� ----------------------- ------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ------------ --_ subject to the following conditions: _ Comments: fUta „a%a. ,.•1_� _ 9 1�10 r ' I � N. r �o I- v+Cl -7 lk t J 6'7Y` r- p 0 R T o-F S T l L cv T �� T� 6-RtL T/t L WA7-F <kP?( T Scf( crl/;zLS TO 7-J w N T—HI� G S -�' r a k l'Y1 I N i v URTocv�j �967D �Yf �I 1 / J C re a 0 v lc// c K rS 0 P, -- PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO SUP/89-41 Planning Commission Meeting July 10, 1989 Project Location 900 Nor n Owens Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name School District #834 Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description Request to Qperate a Latch Key Program (before and after school child care) at Stonebridge Elementary Scnool -- DISCuSSION The request is to conduct a before and after school child care program for school age children attending Stonebridge Elementary School This is a program designed specifically for working parents who, up until the present time, must seek child care for their children before and after a normal school day The -amp will provide child care with a minimum amount of formal structure It will provide a safe and educational environment with qualified staff The parents will be providing transportation for their children involved in this program There will be no additional bus traffic at Stonebridge Elementary School CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 The Planning Department be informed of enrollment of the Latch Key Program and a program evaluation be reviewed by the Planning Department at the end of the first scnool year RECOMMENDATION Approval FINDINGS The proposed use will not oe injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the Ordinance ATTACHMENTS - Letter from School District #834 U Effective Learning Through Excellence in Education 1875 SOUTH GREELEY STREET STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 439 5160 • V TDD June 16, 1989 Mr Steve Russell, Director Planning Department City of Stillwater 216-N 4th-St Stillwater, MN 55082 SUBJECT Request for Special Use Permit at Stonebridge Elementary School for Latch -Key program, 1989-90 school year Dear Mr Russell • Please find enclosed a form requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a Latch -Key program at the Stonebridge Elementary School during the 1989-90 school year The program will begin Tuesday, September 5 and run through June 7, 1990 During the school day, the hours of operation will be 6 00 - 8 30 a m and 2 30 - 6 00 p m On non -school days, full day care will be available from 6 00 a m until 6 00 p m The school district also plans to continue to operate a Latch -Key program at the Oak Park Elementary School in 1989-90 school year Because the program is set up as a non-profit program, I would like to request consideration of waiving any fee involved in granting Special Use Permits If you are in need of additional information, please give me a call at 439-5160, ext 225 Thank you fo Sinc J Jiran, ur help in this application HJJ lb L_1 • COMMUNITY SERVICES and RECREATION DEPARTMENT HOWARD JIRAN Director PAUL WESTMORELAND Assistant Director MAUREEN BOESEL, Program Supervisor An Equal Opportunity Employer PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO SUP/89-42 Planning Commission Meeting July 10, 1989 Project Location 523 West Marsh Street Comprehensive Plan District RB Zoning District Two Family Applicant's Name Independent School District #834 Type of Application Special Use °ermit PROJECT DESCRIPTION A Special Use Permit for the placement of two portable classrooms at the Stillwater Senior High School DISCUSSION The request is to place two additional portable classroom buildings on the South side of Stillwater Senior High School The clas,room buildings will be approximately 24 ft by 36 ft 8 inches, framed with iap siding They will be accessed from the outside of the High School Additional classrooms are in great demand at the Senior High School The school is at capacity and is operating with the Washington School site as a split campus The new classrooms will be staffed by current staff and will not intensify the present use of the school or the parking facilities The design of these buildings is such tnat tney can be moved when the demand for additional classrooms at the High School diminishes RECOMMENDATION Approval FINDINGS The proposed use will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in narmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance ATTACHMENTS - Letter from Mr Dan Parker - Site plan 0 0 Independent School District no 834 June 27, 1989 • City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Attention Ms Ann Pung-Terwedo Assistant Planner 1875 SOUTH GREELEY STREET STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 Phone 439-5160 V TDD Dear Ms Terwedo Re Special Use Permit -- Temporary Classrooms -- Sr High School Enclosed is the completed application and two copies of the Stillwater Sr High School site plan as requested District staff will be present at the July 11, 1989 Planning Commission Meeting and the July 18, 1989 Public Hearing to answer specific questions or concerns that you may wish to address Specifically, you have requested the following data r i U • DAVID WETTERGREN Superintendent 1) The proposed buildings will be 24' x 36'8" framed buildings The exterior will be lap siding, vinyl clad windows on one side, two doors and a pitched roof The basic design of these buildings has been used by the Rosemount and South Washington County School Districts for several years The plans have been revised to meet current building codes and have received State of Minnesota approval 2) The School Board has recently completed a facility and enrollment study One portion of this study centered on the High School being at capacity and operating with the Washington site as a split campus The use of these two structures will allow some flexibility and provide two additional classrooms The district is cooperating with Northeast Metro Tech and South Washington County Schools in a project that will utilize interactive TV in classroom instruction The temporary buildings will allow administration to free -up two rooms in the main campus buildings for interactive TV instruction MARY JO WEINGARTEN Assistant Superintendent Elementary Education KENNETH D PEDERSEN Assistant Superintendent Secondary Education MARV SWANSON DON J LOE WILLIAM E BJORUM Director Director Coordinator Personnel Services Special Services Data Processing An Equal Opportunity Employer DANIEL C PARKER Business Manager HOWARD JIRAN Director Recreation & Grounds City of Stillwater • Attention Ms Ann Pung-Terwedo Page 2 -- Continued The buildings will be staffed by current district staff and service existing students The use of these buildings should not intensify the use of core facilities or increase parking pressure The application does not specify a time limit for the use of these buildings The design is such that they could be moved if the need diminishes and they are needed in other parts of the district Please call me if you need any additional information is needed for either meeting Sincerely, Daniel C Parker Business Manager DCP be Scc Cabinet J Swenson r� U ' ter' THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO PLANNING COMMISSION FROM STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR • DATE JULY 7, 1989 SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM RB TO RA FOR LOTS 4 AND 5, DALLAGER'S ESTATES, LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF 1025 WEST SYCAMORE STREET — --The Planning Commission has received a request from the owner of the residence at 1025 West Sycamore to consider rezoning of two parcels, lots 4 and 5 shown on Map I These lots are currently zoned RB Duplex, eight dwelling units per acre, and the adjacent property owner would like them considered for single fam. ly A notice has been sent out to area property owners The lots are currently vacant and contain 31,418 square feet and 28,789 square feet each Land to the east of the two RB lots is zoned RB Lands to the west are zoned RA Single Family - - The Commission should consider the request, hear public comments and make recommendation on the rezoning to the City Council Either the RB or RA is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Letter from Joanne Kubala and DeWayne Nelson Map of area CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 GLEN p, —C-I e�z • i i LOT I _P ` 1 5 -LK OUT OT�yo 75 10 / 0 p ;"t y! � QO N 4 i !3 700 20, �17551; O �1 � I ��i955gFt - o OUT OT l�o p 40 \ 1 ..X� i�o ° 13, 5as4 ` • I goo �J 0 L'' - 9' s y Q- / n - =- - - 1 _ , ` 1---�L— z cn I X o.0 _ 41 $1 HIN OU I 170 E LI E OF THiL NE IN m i;1,4p�\ x qa rizz- �\� ' - - / 1 FA • 0 June 21, 1989 Planning Commission City of Stillwater ATTN Steve Russell 216 N 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Sirs We are new owners of the property located at 1025 West Sycamore St , Lot 5, Dallagher Estates, in Stillwater On either side of our property are vacant lots, #4, 6 and 7 of Dallagher Estates These lots are currently +--ied up in foreclosure proceedings and have also been served f1nal—notice of delinquent taxes It 1s our understanding that the lots will be sold by the person who initiated the foreclosure as soon as the legal proceedings are complete We have contacted this person to make him aware that we and several of the neignbors are interested in buying these lots Most recently, however, he has indicated a disinterest in talking to the ad3oining property owners about the future of these lots Rather, he has said he will most likely sell them to a contractor Additionally, there has been conversation that the plan is to -build _ townhouses on those lots There has been some confusion about the zoning in this area Before we purchased our property, I spoke to Steve Russell and asked if those lots were single-family or duplex lots At that time, (Feb ,89), he stated that there were no duplex lots in the area After hearing about the possibility of townhouses being built on those lots, I spoke to Steve again He then pointed out a zoning variance which was undated and approved two duplex lots in Dallagher Estates However, at the time, the lot lines were very different and the current #3, 4 and 5 lots were all one parcel, lot #3 The zoning variance names Lot 4 and 5, which today are the lots on wnich our house is located and the ad3o1ning land, which already has a small structure on 1t When these lots were re -divided, the Surveyor erred in his determination of the South line of our property, with the result that the lot line cuts diagonally across the front yard and through the middle of our driveway We are most anxious to negotiate with whoever becomes the owner of Lot 6, 1n an attempt to straighten out this mess 9 i The neignboring property owners are interested in purchasing these lots with the intention of keeping the wooded areas in tact, thus preserving the wildlife whicn habitates this area To construct multiple family dwellings on these properties would destroy the natural neauty of the neighborhood and produce a severely over -crowded situation We request that your committee review this matter and reconsider the zoning exception Dallagher Estates and the adjoining Oak Glen development is an area of fine upper -bracket, single-family h.mes,__and-xt-3 evident that duplexes or townhouses would be an ill fit in this neighborhood We are confident that after review of the current situation, you will agree tnat multiple -family housing is not appropriate for those two lots Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter Sincerely, Joanne P Kubala and PLtu - VV� DeWayne N Psen lie 10 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO V/89-44 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION 2001 Washington Avenue COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT IP-C ZONING DISTRICT Industrial Park Commercial APPLICANT'S NAME Color Systems, Inc TYPE OF APPLICATION Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Q_variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of two new TCF Banking and Saving signs at the Cub Foods Store DISCUSSION The request is to install two new signs for TCF Bank at the Cub Foods Store One sign will be placed on the free-standing "CUB Foods" sign below the "Pharmacy" sign The proposed sign will be approximately 23 square feet in size and 13 feet above grade It will be internally illuminated The other sign will be 28 inch fabricated channel letters with the words "TCF BANK" and 11 inch to 8 inch letters with the abbreviation 'Ifsb" These channel letters will be installed on the existing canopy to the east of the CUB sign on the building They will be neon back lit The 28 inch channel letters are the same size as the existing signs which identify the other businesses in the CUB building These signs were allowed by a variance granted in July, 1986 (Case No 656) The letters mounted on the fascia are designed to match the other retail tenants One sign of 25 square feet is allowed for the TCF use The proposal is consistent with the sign program for the building RECOMMENDATION Approval FINDINGS Baseeon -the size of the building and number of tenants, the request for the two TCF signs seem reasonable The request is consistent with the purpose of the Sign Ordinance ATTACHMENTS - Letter from Color System, Inc - Plans for signs yC Lk,j - • Case Number Qv Fee Paid Data Filed PLANNING ADMINIS i1-51,Ai IVc FORM Scree; Location of Property ____ --__--------------------------------- Legal Doscr►psion of Propertyi Owner N c •n e --_ --------- ----- Zcb� �.ss.6y�" -�" �2 Acicrzss---------------="z-------=----- Phone --------------- Applicant (if other than owner) dame 68G� w z /�� f�ud�`SVC - 3S7a Address-----____1___-- _ _-- Phone- _ AMU sT 6 Type of Request ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary PIat ___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance _-_ Other ------------------- 4 Desc-ipt.on of Request __ /-�-°_�_= ADDi/�oC__3z _5f�S�J.� %b _guts A lo_u 7-of �•yv�v f<v_A� a,J _ o-iFfdX S o cJ�a o� n�� --`See— - /,67s_ !c� - 6--S �ia,� 3 ,0�v 2 of 3 ----------- Signature of Applicant----- Dateof Public Hearing ----------------------------------------- NOTE S.cetc'i of proposed property and structure to be drawn on back or t1m fprliz tacnea, showing tre following 1 worth direction -- M ®a 2. Location of proposed structure on Iot. 2 L o o: -o^t c.^a .. de set-'oac'm ? 4 Dimensions oz proposed structure 5 Street names 7 Other Location ntormation as may be requested. ng buildings �191> Approved _-_ Denied ___ by tho Planning Commission on ----------- (date) subject to the following conditions __—________________________________ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject, to the following conditions -------7------------------------- ------------------- ------------- Comments (Use other side). - _ PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO SUP/89-45 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION 610 County Road #5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT RA ZONING DISTRICT Single Family APPLICANT'S NAME Oakridge Community Church TYPE OF APPLICATION Special Use Permit PROJECT DESCRIPTION A Special l,ae Permit for the placement of a new sign at Oakridge Community Church DISCUSSION The request is to place a new 49 square foot sign approximately 7 feet in height at Oakridge Community Church The sign will be burgundy with white lettering in the same location as the present sign and be internally illuminated It will be supported with metal posts A Special Use Permit is required for this type of signage in residential districts The reason for this new sign is to upgrade the quality and appearance of the sign and to improve the lighting As stated, the sign will be internally illuminated because of recent vandalism to the ground fixtures which externally illuminated the present sign The church feels the new sign will help with the goals and guidelines for attractive signs along County Road #5 There are three residential homes to the west of the site on County Road #5 These houses are in direct view of the sign The church and the slope of the property create a visual barrier of the sign to the other residential homes in the area CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 The illumination of the sign shall not be obtrusive to the residential neighborhood 2 All landscaping shall be in place before the sign may be illuminated RECOMMENDATION Approval FINDINGS The granting of this variance will be in general harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Sign Ordinance ATTACHMENTS Plan or Sign - Letter from Pastor Forsberg OAKQIDGE r COMMUNITY ttitual AN EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP 610 County road 5 Stillwater Mn 55082 612 439-4882 PASTOR LARRY FORSBEQC June 28, 1989 - - Mr Wally Abrahamson, Mayor W.-Steve Russell, City Planner 216 No Fourth St Stillwater, Mn 55082 Dear Sirs, We want to take this opportunity to thank you for your part in making Stillwater a fine place to live It is our desire to be a helpful part of our our community by offering training for children and families that promote an atmosphere of love for all people and guidance in key areas of life The purpose of this letter is to explain our church sign and the changes we would like to make. s our desire to comply with the goals and guidelines for attractive, readable signs along ty Road #5 The sign we currently have has-been in place for -approximately 20 years --The ---- size of the sign is 7' 8" wide by 6'_ 22" high The wooden posts are 8' 5" high It is lit by two flood -light type fixtures in the ground Our two-sided sign has served us well We would like to upgrade our sign to be more attractive and readable and to display our new name, Oakridge Community Church (formerly First Baptist Church for over 100 years) Over the years, our sign has been vandalized several times. The ground lighting fixtures have been broken off several times and light bulbs stolen or broken In order to correct this continual problem, Suburban bighting has proposed to build a new two- sided bexan interior lit sign made of metal framing and plastic The location would not change nor would the dimensions change significantly. The only change we are proposing is to add 10" to the height of the sign to make the reader board (place to show times or services) a bit larger so people can read it while driving by Our current letters are too small for passing motorists to read easily The added 10" would help us provide an easy readable sign thereby assisting passing traffic. The actual square footage remains approximately the same because we are reducing the width by 8". As we have observed other signs along County 5, many business have reader board signs with the same dimensions and materials The only changes on our new sign we are proposing are to add 10" to the existing height, reduce the width by 8" and add interior lights rather than ground lighting We thank you for your time and helpful spirit in this regard r Y Sincerely, Pastor rs n = SHAPING MESSAGE OF GODS LOVE FOPCIVENE68 AND HOPE L 9 1 Provide two 4" x 4" steel sqaure tubing, embedded in concrete, enclosed with wood trim 2 gabinet made of metal and steel painted 3 races of 187 thickness lexan a tower portion of sign to be changeable copy and covered with additonal lexan face to avoid vandalism of letters Internally illuminated, UL approved. J -6�� i 00� Co t Efrce� n 17 a ti , } l P 9 OAKQIDGI COMMUNI'I`Y AN EVANGEJLICAL FELLOW811D 9: �5 AM MOLE STUDY W:40AM AMAKWOKEY 7:00 PM% AZI, PWRCKRILEY P;1bTOR IAQQY C0Q515CQC t� k � a! z1Z, toLRt�> BA cX &RrjU,riD -R�M)n G w r EM 4- 'bysTo N LoC-Ks RaW S Mi OAMID(I'24 OMMUN ITY chuQCff AN EVANCE' AL I'ELLOW8HP M AM MOLE STUDY W:4® AM JO hiCK99MY 7: 0® PM M1 F CK90LEY 11DA P, I[1I,-)pY FOQ6, bEQ)G il IWO This sign will remain at the same location facing North and South as traffic passes on County Road #5. The sign runs perpendicular to the street so as to view the sign It is a 2 sided exterior lit sign now our proposal is to light the sign from the inside with fluorescent -t ng The dimensions of the sign will be 7' x 7'(total outside dimensions) Our current s is 6' 22" high by 7' 8" wide The toal area will remain the same We already have electrical service to the sign We will run conduit to the new sign PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NOS SUB/89-48, V/89-46, V/89-47 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION 412 - 418 West Wilkins Street COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT Two Family Residential ZONING DISTRICT RB APPLICANT'S NAME Stanley and Elizabeth McDonald PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS The project has three planning reviews, a resubdivison to modify a property boundary (SUB/89-48), a variance required for the existing garage that results -rrum the location of the new lot line (V/89-46) and a variance for the construction of a new attached garage (V/89-47) SUB/89-48 - The request is to resubdivide two lots (lots 25 and 26 of 11,070 square and lot 27 of 5,535 square feet) into two lots marked Lots A and B on the site plan of A = 681x135' = 9,180 square feet and lot B 55'x135' _ 7,425 square feet The single family lot size requirement is 7,500 square f eet Existing lot 27 is 5,535, so the modification brings one lot more into conformity with lot size requirements V/89-46 - One variance is for the existing garage that would be located on new Lot A The proposed sideyard setback is 2 1/2 ft, 5 ft is required V/89-47 - A second variance is requested to construct a new attached garage to the existing residence at 418 West Wilkins Street The proposed garage is a sixteen ft one stall garage The proposed setback is two ft The adjacent residence to the east is approximately 30 ft away It would be possible to reduce the width of the garage to fourteen ft and for the garage to accommodate a one car stall RECOMMENDATION 1 SUB/89-48 - Approval 2 V/89-46 - Approval 3 Approval with possible reduction of width of garage to 14 or 15 ft FINDINGS Because of the existing structure location and small lot sizes, the proposed is consistent with the intent of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance ATTACHMENT Plan a 0 0 16' x 22' SINGLE CAR ATTACHED GARAGE PACKAGE Designed to match your home s construction with a box 3 enclosed overhang Provides a protected passage from your home to the car j 3 r t L= V _.0 100 G g O _ Case Number _`l s F W p �J ee Pc,d�-------- • Date Filed --- -/3°/t`L--- PLANNINt ADMINIS T RAT IVE FORM Street Location of Property _�11 �____� 8 _ .L�1 �.�s11�bct_✓_ ST 12, 6 6 4.k 7 W�� lds Legal Doscnption of Property: Owner Name ?f �__/ -L A— cress ------------ Phone _,�_�4 =4 22 L _ A-policcnt (►f other than owner). Name -------------------------------- A d dr e s s ------------------------------ Phone ------------ -- Type of Request ___ Rezoning ,X_ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat ___ Variance ___ Other ------------------ Desc-ipt,on of Request ---� ----5 F -- =-- �. e--------------------------- Signature of Applicant. Data of Public Hearing ------------------------------------ NO',. S,cetc : or proposed property and structure to be drawn on back or this forte or at- tacnea, showing *e following- 1 North direction. 2 Location or proposed structure on lot. 3 Dimensions or front and side set -backs 4 Dimensions or proposed structure 5 Street names. 6 Location or adjacent easting buildings 7 Other inrormatma as may be requestea. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho Planning Commission on ___________ (data) subiect to the following conditions ----------------------------- —___ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ sublet to the following conditions. Comments. (Use other side), _ w fps/ 7 -t _ _- - - — --- -- GJ� 4&rnJ s �, a I I � I 12 - — �xrs7T..va--- --' -G' R qr-m — -- — — - -- cC SIZ - - --- - ---- -- ---- — -- - - - - - Ho N — - —o paN - -- I - I Ll I I I i I I I I I I P I I ir/o �Q 1 /7 n L. c= I I !_- 4 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NOS PUD/89-50 & SUB/89-49 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 10, 1989 PROJECT LOCATION South of new 61st Street and Tuenge Drive COMPREHENSI'E PLAN DISTRICT Multi -Family Residential ZONING DISTRICT RB Duplex APPLICANT'S NAME The Parlay Group TYPE Gr APPLICATION Planned Unit Development Concept Approval PROJECT uE:;-0R:WTION Forty two lot Planned Unit Development with zero lot line on one side of lot BACKGROUND A Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved in 1987 for the Brick Pond Planning Area (see attached map) The plan changes the land use designation of the existing site from Industrial Park - Industrial to Duplex Residential/Eight dwelling units per acre • The proposed Planned Unit Development comprises 42 lots The lots are designed to have a zero lot line on one side and ten foot setback - 20 feet from the adjacent residence on the other The lots range in size from 4,921 square feet to over 7,000 square feet for the corner parcels The shaded area shows the building envelope for each site The width of the building envelope ranges from 13-21 feet for the corner lots to 28 feet for a typical lot The 13-21 foot building envelope frontage is narrow None of the submitted building designs could fit on the lot It is recommended that the minimum building envelope width be 25 feet This could accommodate a typical townhouse design without a variance Particularly lot 32 with a 43 foot frontage should be reconfigured With the 30 foot setback from 61st Street and the cul-de-sac, only 13+ of footage is available at the setback line The overall project density is within the RB Duplex density limits The road alignment, grading and utility plan is being reviewed by the City Engineer A park dedication fee is required for new residential subdivisions the fee could be used to purchase neighborhood park land designated across 61st Street The Greeley Square Commercial Center and commercial land along the Frontage Road to the south should be buffered from the site A solid wood fence and landscaping was constructed along the western boundary of the site as part of the Greeley Square project and additional landscaping is shown, consisting of Norway Pine Trees, between the fence and the residences It is recommended the trees be planted to help separate the southern boundary of the site from the commercial land along the Frontage Road as were When the commercial land develops, a fence can be required 9 r • The building designs are shown as typical, or possible, building designs but not the exact design of the lots FINDINGS The PUD application as submitted and conditioned is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance RECOMMENDAT WN Approval CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 An in lieu park fee shall be paid equal to 15% of the current market value of the property 2 A detailed landscape plan showing the location, size and planting schedule shall be provided before final PUD approval The landscape plan shall provide a landscape buffer for the project on the west and south sides of the site and one tree per lot 3 The minimum building envelope lot width shall be 25 feet with the standard 30 ft frontyard and corner sideyard, 10 ft sideyard and 25 ft rearyard setback shall be met 4 Any comments from the City Engineer regarding grading, drainage, or utilities shall be shown on the plans submitted for final PUD approval 5 A schedule for development of the site, i e site preparation and housing development shall be submitted with final PUD approval information 6 A Development Agreement providing for site improvements shall be entered into before final PUD approval 7 All utilities shall be undergrounded and street lighting shall be installed as a part of utility installation 8 The Final Plat shall be presented for approval when the Final PUD is presented for approval ATTACHMENTS - Preliminary Plat - Grading and Drainage Plan and Topo Map - Typical Building Elevations 11 �,a r 211 Q� Case � .,jmber _ ,5v ' 1-50 00 - Fee l aid _---------- Date Filed PLANNING ADMINI5 T RAT IVE FORM 61St Street & Tuenge Dr_____________ Street Location o Property __------------- see preliminary plat ________ Legal Doscription of Propertys ______ re 1 j m nary _-- -- The Parlay Group (Richard Ernst II) _____________ Owner Ncme ----------------------- — Ernst Phone 7.77— 4-4 B-------- er Name ---------------- Aooliccnt (if ctl►�r than owner) --------------'-- Adcress ---------------------------- Type Phone --------- of Request ___ Rezoning X_ Approval of Preliminary Plot Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat --- Variance --- Other ------------------- Descript,on of Request _Applicant req,uests_apprayal of �re�.im�n�ry_plat —___containing, 42_single_family__°Z"_lot_line_�ursuant to _City__ Council eoncegt_approval 6/6/89______________________ ------------------ Signature of Applicant ------'---- Date of Public Hearin----------------------- ----------------- NOTE Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn on back of this fora or at. tached, showing the fonoanng I I North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3 Dimensions of front and side set -backs. ^� 4 Dimensions of proposed structure '�,�` "o t 5 Street names. 6 Location of adjacent existing buildings `3 aLi 7 Other =ormation as may be requesteo- UW f�� Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ----------- (day subject to the following conditions ____________________ ---------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ sublet` to *8 following conditions ---------------------------- -------T--------------------- _ Comments. (Use other side). - THE PARLAY GRC�P, INC - - - P O Box 441 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 • June 30, 1989 Mr Steven Russell Community Development Director City of Stillwater 216 N Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Steve Thank you for your phone call of June 21, 1989 regarding the Forest Ridge Addition To review that conversation, the items we discussed included Additional information needed by your offices in connection with the Forest Ridge Sub -Division You requested we proceed on the basis for P U D approval for the development and a minor sub -division Among the additional information you requested, you included the following shadowing the building area of each lot with specific attention to the front yard set back measuring 25-30 feet and side yard set back measuring 10 feet — Additional plantings along the westerly Greeley Square boundary Elevations of example residences which could be part of the development Please find attached the additional information relevant to your request including a letter from Rose Floral Inc confirming the existence of a valid Purchase Agreement for part of the property included as part of the Forest Ridge Addition Sincerely, - THE PARLAY GROUP,_INC Richard C 45st II- -_ President_- -r RCEI I/ml - r - Enclosures i = -Check #2027 _$250 00 ^_, `— J..t4 f!' �� i �� _ iT %— -+•d74 -i+." � i^s. =C-'a xi ..-� fn r. �-3L eK'e! r.ny,Rasa �k y�l ~'L +. Y X x+a `..'--•r_�� .s.T..I.T l _ J..zv vim= +. .�.i[.`i ._ 1 f � —' Z _� Y h n. 'x" � `y, y'Y L.: .:1. � � ^fy..��.isJ .R � "xr',Y N Y"vt� _ r .. v, .T era _Y�^7'S t � ` L" 3 iti" n r. Lyr. -�-, �r�•+� 3 ` �J.� (� .iL Y} � '� SF 4 �.�- "�, J y t.� `}� nA.. �-+''..m. �i v �.rw�f Y� �}" "Y` �`nY T ih ��R'v5X 'L4y l�� r��i 9..4...`_^.w.�-:'C~�Jw..�'f'm_..�?'i'�a...-, k+iJg'"3¢Gr.+.bY `'lS� Y J �w ti. � .t- �� r� ..f� --1� � '"�..a^..+ti�'T�•- w � "'aM �, �sn 0 Rose Floral & Greenhouse • 1321 South Fifth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 • n U June 28, 1989 Mr Stephen Russell Director of Community Development City of Stillwater `Z15-N- 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr Russell This letter is to confirm that there exists a valid Purchase Agreement, dated May 18, 1989, between Rose Floral Inc and The Parlay Group, Inc , for that land shown outlined in red on the attached exhibit This Purchase Agreement is in full force and effect and provides for Rose Floral Inc , joining in the plating as it relates to it's land Sincerely, f � i F t G 1 I 4 1 (2360A) 62I09033 123609) (1 91AC) 12 TOAC) 61 A 4 AC to I R 62-09033 62-09033 2351 235T 146 AC 196-95033 B) 325 AC (2250A) I 2250 (3 96 AC) (596 (2 14 AC) I e 10 AC %-95033 62-09033 2100 2356 I 6 72 AC. u 96 92520 3 96-95033 0000 2150 090M 09033 2354 2353 121 AC 403 AC 076 AG � r 094 AG i f TRUNK HIGHWAY NO 36 , i NON -ASSESSABLE AREAS u no FOREST HILLS FRONTAGE ROAD & SOUTH GREELEY AREA ®S��f I STILLWATER, MINNESOTA �12009 PARCEL MAP .-w• --��. + ��-/ a s�ra�ik�hY "' ti.v}�c.k+ ksu. �7 ae�-r�^wrr,� %t ,� r u�_..� .�a.w. -� "-�1�.0 t-v ^' .� q �^Lsrt^$i+Y��} .�.�wi.•a � �v� q RO SE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 531 DET ION Ay �•,� _, 7` �), *»� ,y,) a BAST ) z'1` Y)i }�? qti k,� , �) • '!^►+ 62 -09033 ; •` 4' '� �', yam' r �,' �T? �:'syl� NO SCAL QD 2360 �j O rr,62r 09033 - — — � 62-09033= I I DEDIC2351 ATED R/W.� ', r`962250 33 IVIED UM DENSITY ULTI FAMILY 96 -95033 1 I I w i x 2100 y GREEN BUFFER •� y 3 Y t + A Ct r i� „''A - , �.c PROPOSE r. a aye o BASIN WAREHOUSE 'a I MARKET ai 3 INDUSTRIAL PA K COMME I L DISTRIC 0 09033 09033 I 3uiIlla- � (I II i 2ti3� 5�\4 a23O5J 5 (Q CROWN 62 090395033- 95033 96-95033 2210 2200~w2150 a2353 Io03 I AVTO60th STREET LEGEND .� ZONING DISTRICTS ----CITY LIMITS PROPOSED LAND USE DATE 6-16-87 �� STILLWATER MINNESOTA FILE 87068 r I • APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO SUB/89-35 Planning Commission Meeting June 12, 1989 Project Location Northwest corner of the intersection of Washington Avenue and Curve Crest Boulevard Applicant's Name C R Hackworthy COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT Industrial Park -Industrial ZONING DISTRICT IP-I TYPE OF APPLICATION Minor Subdivision Project Description Preliminary Plat approval for the subdivision of an 8 68 acre site into two lots of 2 8 acres (24,886 sq ft ) and 5 81 acres (253,176 sq ft ) at the Northwest corner of the intersection of Washington Avenue and Curve Crest Blvd Discussion The request is to subdivide a large Outlot in the Stillwater Industrial Park into two smaller lots One lot of 5 81 acres will remain vacant A 35,238 sq ft office/warehouse/retail building will be constructed • on the 2 87 acre parcel with parking for approximately 50 vehicles The proposed lots meet the lot size depth and width requirements The lot coverage meets City requirements It also meets City requirements for parking and parking lot accessibility CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 The Final Plat shall include the City Engineer's comments regarding drainage, easements, and other requirements RECOMMENDATION Approval FINDINGS The proposed land division is consistent with the use and lot size requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan ATTACHMENTS - Certificate of Survey - Site plan for subdivision - Case Number _ --i= -Woft too Fee Paid _-1 ------ Date Filed ______________ PLANNING AIDS' INIIS i SAT IVI FORM 5IN- eet Location or' Property Northwest Corn, , .�,uters aasi£lda5b1n aAve & Curve Crest Boulevard Lac,ol Doscr►pt►on of Property Parcel 2_of outlot A� Sr}.11,dij ex Irud� Ls�raal Perk Owner Name Curve Crest Properties----- ------------------------ Address 1809 Northwestern Ave Stillwater Phone _L6121 430-1500 __ Applicant (if other than owner) Name _cR_ Hackworthy___________________ Address1809 Northwestern Ave- , Stillwater phone _L612j 43QQ-1500__ ---------------- - Type of Request ___ Rezoning X_ Approval of Preliminary Pict __- Special Use Permit, ___ Approval of Final Pict ___ Variance Other Desc-ipt.on of Request ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------__----------------- Signature of Applicant _ ________________ ---- Data of Publlc Hearing --------------------------------------------- NOT,- S&etc'i or pronosea property and structure to be arawa on back or thrs corm or at- tacrea, showing tre foilowmg 1 North auect.on. 2 Loca, on of proposed structure on lot. 3 Dimens ons or front and siae set -backs 4 Dimensions or proposea structure 5 Street na.: es 6 Loca,.on or ad]acent e%isting bLudings 7 Other inrorriation as may be reques`ea- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ___________ (date) sublet- to the following conditions __—_____________________----------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Approved __- Denied __- by the Council on ________________ sublet' to *e following conditions -------- ------- -------------------------------- --------- Comr:.ents (Use other side). Ir J M •A 29M EMVSAE H ENGINEERS N ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS June 12, 1989 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612 484 02 72 Mr Steve Russell CuMuTtanity Development Director City of Stillwater 216 N Fourth Street City Hall Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr Russell RE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA PLANNING CASE REVIEW PLANNING CASE SUB/89-35 As you requested, we have reviewed the proposed lot split for Outlot A Stillwater Industrial Park This parcel -is -located at the intersection of Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue The parcel to be split off is irregular in shape with 413 55 feet on the west side and 341 33 feet on the north side Our review consisted of possible drainage easements and/or any other easements required for City purposes involving the lot Split The City code requires a 6 foot easement along both property lines for drainage This has been the practice in the past on other parcels within the Industrial Park It appears the drainage for this particular building could be contained within the parking area and drained to the street However, we would recommend securing a 6 foot easement on the north and west sides at a minimum to accommodate any possible needs for drainage on adjacent parcels in the future If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned Richard E Moore City Engineer REM/cmb SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS HENDRICKSON INC MINNESOTA WISCONSIN