HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-12-18 HPC Packeti11wa
tr.
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA j
AGENDA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North
December 18th, 2019
REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Possible approval of minutes of November 20th, 2019 special meeting
2. Possible approval of minutes of November 20th, 2019 regular meeting
IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects
which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the
statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out
of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less.
V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are
considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or
citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered separately.
3. Resolution HPC 2019-01: Adopting Findings of Fact for HPC Case No. 2019-21 (Available
Wednesday)
VI. NEW BUSINESS
4. Case No. 2019-29: Consideration of a Design Permit for exterior changes at the property
located at 217 2nd St N in the Downtown Design Review District. Midnight Real Estate,
property owners.
5. Case No. 2019-30: Consideration of a Design Permit for an exterior vent pipe on the
property located at 123 2nd St N in the Downtown Design Review District. Judd Sather
representing Frederick Real Estate Group, LLC, property owners and Sara Jesperson,
applicant.
VII. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS
6. Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Meeting in a Box
VIII. FYI
IX. ADJOURNMENT
i I I \ i's'Ater
THE OIRTIIPLACE OF NINNESOTA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
November 20, 2019
Special Meeting
Vice -Chair Steinwall called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
Present: Vice -Chair Steinwall, Commissioners Krakowski, Larson, and Walls
Staff: City Planner Wittman
Guests:
Excelsior Heritage Preservation Commissioner Tim Caron, Excelsior HPC Residential
Review Research Committee Members John Beattie and Bruce Noll, and Excelsior City
Planner Emily Becker
STAFF PRESENTATION
City Planner Wittman presented photographs depicting Stillwater home designs prior to the City's
creation and adoption of the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD). She additionally presented
designs of home designs after NCD review as well as outlined existing and future challenges the
Stillwater HPC is facing with NCD review.
EXCELSIOR RESIDENTIAL REVIEW BOARD'S RESEARCH COMMITTEE
City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commissioners outlined the challenges with the NCD review,
noting that the design guidelines are recommended but codified standards would be binding. The
City of Excelsior representatives inquired of the City's NCD review application and relationship to the
City's demolition review. City Planner Wittman advised of the current HPC ordinance update, design
guideline consolidation, and demolition review modifications project and its relationship to the City
Council's moratorium on demolition review of historic resources. City of Excelsior representatives
commented on the City of Stillwater's "massing to detail" review approach, noting good design has
been a result. City of Stillwater HPC Commissioners answered questions regarding the NCD.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Krakowski, seconded by Commissioner Walls, to adjourn. All in favor, 4-0. The
meeting was adjourned at 5:40 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner
i I I \ i's'Ater
THE OIRTNPLACE OF NINNESOTA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
November 20, 2019
7:00 P.M.
Chairwoman Mino called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
Present: Chairman Mino, Commissioners Finwall, Krakowski, Larson, Steinwall, Thueson, Walls,
Council Representative Junker
Absent: None
Staff: City Planner Wittman
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Possible approval of minutes of October 16, 2019
Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Walls, to approve the minutes of the October
16, 2019 meeting. Motion passed, 7-0.
OPEN FORUM
There were no public comments.
CONSENT AGENDA
There were no items on the Consent Agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
There were no public hearings.
NEW BUSINESS
Case No. 2019-28: Consideration of a Design permit to remodel the existing storefront at 218 Main St N
in the Downtown Design Review District. Michael Lynskey Sr., and Lee Bjerk, property owners, and
Dariush and Sarah Moslemi, applicants.
City Planner Wittman explained the application. Dariush Moslemi is planning to open a new
restaurant, to be known as the Rusty Mile, at 218 Main Street North. The Design Permit involves: 1) a
new hollow metal service door on the south elevation to match the existing service door; 2) a 4' tall ,
40 square foot Rooftop Unit (RTU) and 4' tall, 17' long Makeup Air Unit (MAU) that will have two
condensers on top of it; 3) a 40" wide, circular hood exhaust fan to extend three feet beyond the south
wall elevation; 4) a set of two wall signs, 24" tall by 10' wide, proposed to utilize the existing sign
brackets. Constructed of metal, the signs will have raised lettering and a burnt orange, white and
black color scheme to read "Rusty Mile Roadhouse and Nostalgia Bar" as well as possibly "HWY 95
Stillwater EST. 2019"; 5) a 52" black graphic design (i.e. mural/painted wall) sign to look like a bottle
cap. The mural is proposed to advertise the business name with the same language, color and font as
the front facade's wall sign. She stated that the applicant expressed willingness to comply with the
staff -recommended conditions, however the property owner objects to screening the rooftop units.
Staff finds with certain conditions the proposed improvements conform to the standards set forth for
design review and therefore recommends approval with 12 conditions.
Dariush Moslemi, applicant, shared emails that property owner Michael Lynskey sent him objecting to
the screening, including pictures of other buildings whose HVAC systems have not been required to
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting November 20, 2019
be screened. The proposed location for the rooftop unit is in the center and back of the building so the
property owner feels it will be minimally visible from Main Street. Mr. Moslemi asked if he could
install the HVAC and then determine after installation whether it is visible and needs to be screened.
Commissioner Larson pointed out there are two ways to screen rooftop units - buy a unit that the
screen can hang off, which may be too late to do after installation, or put supports around it.
Mr. Moslemi said he will talk to engineers to see if the unit can be pushed further away from the south
side so it would be less visible. He also said he plans to remove the awning across the first floor of the
building and center the new sign sign on the building. Regarding the bottlecap sign, he asked if it
could include something such as "Stillwater, Birthplace of Minnesota" and the word "Roadhouse"
without exceeding signage restrictions. He plans to do a mural on the south side of the building.
Commissioner Larson noted that the Commission would encourage a mural as described.
Ms. Wittman added that murals are allowed provided they have a historic theme and do not advertise
an existing business or company.
Commissioner Finwall asked if outdoor seating is planned.
Mr. Moslemi replied he does not plan for outdoor seating at present but he may come back requesting
outdoor seating for a second phase. He also would like to place a circular projecting sign on the south
side.
Ms. Wittman confirmed that a request for exterior seating would have to come back to the HPC. She
suggested the Commission may want to table approval of the projecting sign until applicant comes
back with another request.
Commissioner Larson expressed concern about the side vent/hood on the south elevation sticking out
perpendicular to Main Street where it will be visible.
Mr. Moslemi said the vent can't go through the building internally as staff recommended, due to the
existing business upstairs. He would rather have it go up at an angle without having it go all the way
up to the rooftop. He might move it further to the west, away from the second story window.
Commissioner Larson asked if the vent could be run to the back of the building.
Mr. Moslemi replied the issue is the property line. He will try to incorporate the vent into the mural
design somehow.
Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Finwall, to approve Case No. 2019-28,
Design Permit to remodel the existing storefront at 218 Main St N, with the 12 staff -recommended
conditions, changing Condition #8 to state that the kitchen hood shall be incorporated into a mural, and
changing Condition #9 requiring that the rooftop units be screened from public view on south and east
elevations at a minimum, though screening on all four sides is preferred. Motion passed, 7-0.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Case No. 2019-21: Consideration of a Design Permit fora multi -tenant sign plan for the property located
at 1400 (1570) Frontage Rd W in the West Stillwater Business Park District. Valley Ridge Holdings, LLC,
property owner and Gordon Skamser Jr., applicant.
Ms. Wittman stated that in September the HPC reviewed a Design Permit request from Gordon
Skamser Jr. of Norman Quacks to amend the multi -tenant sign plan for Valley Ridge Mall. If approved,
the specific amendments would allow Norman Quacks to keep their illegally installed, nonconforming
neon sign in place on the building, on an architectural feature and above the parapet line. At the
meeting the HPC determined the sign may not obscure the architectural feature. The HPC tabled
consideration of the Design Permit for a multi -tenant sign plan for the property and directed staff to
work with the applicant on amendments that would not jeopardize staff's ability to administer the
Page 2 of 4
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting November 20, 2019
plan but would allow for increased signage opportunities for this business given its uniqueness. Staff
met with the applicant to discuss potential changes to the sign plan and advised the applicant to work
on the development of a new zone for their tenant space that could be incorporated into the approved
multi -tenant sign plan. Staff also indicated they would work to see if there are options for
modification of the plan that may be more fair and equitable to all tenants in the building. Later that
same day staff asked the applicant and the owner's representative to clarify the tenant map on file.
The applicant asked if it would be wise to move forward with their request if staff was exploring
options for a sign plan amendment. Staff advised they should proceed with the development of their
desirable zone changes. On October 9 staff requested the applicant submit their desired changes as
soon as possible for the October 16 HPC packet release. On October 10 staff advised material
submission (for the October meeting) was needed that day in order for the HPC to consider the
amended request at the October 16 HPC meeting. The applicant indicated they needed additional
time. Staff advised a deadline of noon on November 6 for inclusion in the HPC's November meeting
packet. On November 11 staff emailed the applicant asking for an updated proposal. To the date of
memo development, the applicant has not submitted any updated plans for staff. Because of State
statutory requirements, the HPC must take action on the original request. As the amendments to the
multi -tenant sign plan do not conform to City Code nor the approved multi -tenant sign plan, staff
recommends denial of Design Permit No. 2019-21.
Gordon Skamser Jr., applicant, explained that in September, guided by City staff, he made a concerted
effort to adjust the sign plan for Valley Ridge Mall with permission from the ownership group. After
meeting with the HPC, he met with Ms. Wittman. He left that meeting feeling like he might have a
blueprint to go forward, but he did not get the amendments that staff said they may work on.
Therefore he didn't feel it was prudent to come up with an entirely different zone plan. He asked if
there is a path for him to make his case before the City Council. He thinks it's a great sign that
brightens the corner where it is placed.
Commissioner Junker agreed it's a nice sign, but because it is a multi tenant building, he is concerned
about making an exception for one business. He would rather see a smaller sign that conforms to the
sign plan.
Mr. Skamser stated that the current sign plan does not correctly identify the 5,000 square feet of
space he has as anything other than just another in -mall space. The other businesses have different
business models and different sign needs. It is not logical for that corner space to not have a sign
facing east. He also does not understand the critical nature of the sign band. He thought when he did
not get those amendment changes from staff, it was probably going to be another month.
Ms. Wittman stated that she said she could look to see how the sign plan could be amended, but there
are 30 tenants and she does not feel it is staff's role to amend the sign plan. The applicant also has a
variance that has been tabled pending the HPC's application, which has to go before the Planning
Commission next week. If the applicant would like to appeal, he could do so before the City Council
provided both bodies deny the application.
Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to deny a Design Permit for a
multi -tenant sign plan for the property located at 1400 (1570) Frontage Rd W, Case 2019-21. Motion
passed, 7-0.
OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS
2020 Preserve MN Conference Committee
Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office's CLG Coordinator & Historic Preservation Specialist Michael
Koop led discussion of the planning process for the 2020 Preserve MN Conference. He offered to meet with
the conference committee monthly if desired. He solicited input on recommended sites for the Friday tours.
Ms. Wittman's recommendations for tour topics are: lumbering in the St. Croix Valley, early social life,
Page 3 of 4
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting November 20, 2019
government, and the conservation district. The tours must have good quality, well known informed
presenters. An alternative to using buses would be a walking tour that would last about 3 hours. For a
keynote speaker, he suggested Autumn Rierson Michael of Davidson, NC. He encouraged Commissioners
and City Councilmembers to participate in the sessions. Scholarships are available for elected officials and
commissioners to cover the $100 registration fee. The City has a $13,800 certified local government grant
that will be used to pay for the keynote speaker, her travel expenses and other expenses.
Ms. Wittman encouraged the commissioners to think about session topics and keynote speaker content.
There will be a conference committee planning meeting at 6 pm December 18, one hour before the regular
HPC meeting. Chamber, Convention and Visitors Bureau and Independent Business Association
representatives will be invited to attend.
HPC Enabling Ordinance Consultant Recommendation
Ms. Wittman said the City received two qualified proposals to update the HPC enabling ordinance and
consolidate design guidelines at a not -to -exceed fee of $26,000. She reviewed the proposals. Staff
recommends the entering into a contract with HKGi and Landscape Research LLC.
Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall, to recommend that the Council enter a
contract with HKGi and Landscape Research LLC. Motion passed, 7-0.
2020 Work Plan
Ms. Wittman stated that the City has preliminarily budgeted $5,000 for the HPC for 2020 projects and
programs. As the Community Development Department updates its five-year work plan and 2020 projects,
staff would like HPC input on how to best direct 2020 resources.
Commissioner Steinwall suggested using the Comprehensive Plan to determine projects for the coming
year.
Ms. Wittman added that the Comprehensive Plan includes, over the next 1-3 years: revising regulations,
consolidating guidelines and standards, and analyzing and prioritizing designation opportunities. Staff could
review sites that are nationally listed with a view toward prioritizing efforts to list them locally. She also
noted the Hersey Bean wall stabilization, developing an overarching downtown interpretation plan, and a
plan for the Bergstein Buildings. Discussion will continue at the next meeting.
2020 HPC Meeting Schedule
Ms. Wittman noted that the September 16, 2020 HPC meeting conflicts with the first day of the 2020
Preserve MN conference. The Commission agreed to change the September meeting to September 22, 2020.
FYI
2040 Comprehensive Plan Adoption
Ms. Wittman reported that the Council formally adopted the Comprehensive Plan.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Walls, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall, to adjourn. Motion passed, 7-0. The
meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Julie Kink, Recording Secretary
Page 4 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. HPC 2019-01
CITY OF STILLWATER
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
RESOLUTION ADOPTING WRITTEN STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR
DENIAL PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, § 15.99, SUBD. 2, FOR A
DESIGN PERMIT APPLICATION TO AMEND THE MULTI -TENANT
MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1570 FRONTAGE
ROAD WEST
HPC CASE NO. 2019-21
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a request from the Applicant Gordon
Skamser Jr. for an amendment to the multi -tenant master sign plan for the property
located at 1570 Frontage Road West (PID 3203020440025) on August 28, 2019, legally
described as follows:
LOT 1, BLOCK 4, AND THAT PART OF LOT 2, BLOCK 4, LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE
DRAWN PARALLEL TO AND 100 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, ALL IN
STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK EXCEPT THAT PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, STILLWATER
INDUSTRIAL PARK, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the Applicant had requested an amendment to the multi -tenant
master sign plan to allow for increased signage allowance for South Elevation Zone-B
and to allow for the Applicant's 8'X10' (80 square foot) sign to be located above the
established sign band area; and
WHEREAS, the Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed and considered the
request based on the related documents shown in the Applicants' Application at their
regular meeting on September 18, 2019 and continued to November 20, 2019; and
WHEREAS, at the November 20, 2019, Heritage Preservation Commission
meeting, a motion was made by Commissioner Steinwall and seconded by Commissioner
Larson to deny the application. The Commission voted 7 in favor, with none opposing,
and the motion passed; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes, § 15.99, Subd. 2(c), provides that "[i]f a
multimember governing body denies a request, it must state the reasons for denial on the
record and provide the applicant in writing a statement of the reasons for the denial. If the
written statement is not adopted at the same time as the denial, it must be adopted at the
next meeting following the denial of the request but before the expiration of the time
allowed for making a decision under this section. The written statement must be
consistent with the reasons stated in the record at the time of the denial. The written
statement must be provided to the applicant upon adoption."
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Heritage Preservation
Commission of the City of Stillwater hereby adopts the following written statement of the
reasons for denial stated on the record at the November 20, 2019, regular Heritage
Preservation Commission meeting by Commissioners voting to deny the requested
Design Permit amendment:
1. The requested Design Permit was not consistent with all the standards for
granting a Design Permit as described in Section 31-209, Subdivision f, (1)
through (8) of the Stillwater Zoning Ordinance. More specifically, the
Heritage Preservation Commission members voting against the requested
Design Permit stated on the record at the September 18, 2019 and November
20, 2019, regular Heritage Preservation Commission meetings that the request
was not justified for the following reasons:
a. The City reviews and approves multi -tenant master sign plans for
consistent, uniform, fair, and attractive sign placement on multi -tenant
buildings.
b. The total number of signs for this business, their location, height and size
is not consistent with the multi -tenant master sign plan approved as part of
HPC Case No. 2013-42.
c. The size of the existing, nonconforming sign is not consistent with the
approved sign plan.
d. The location of the existing, nonconforming sign, outside of the sign band
area and on an architectural feature, is not consistent with the approved
sign plan nor City Code Section 31-509, Subdivision 3j.
Adopted by the Heritage Preservation Commission of the City of Stillwater this 18th day
of December, 2019.
Amy Mino, Chair
Attest:
Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner
Ilwater
T F1 E 6cRIH PEA C E Of M INNE S E T A
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-29
REPORT DATE: December 12, 2019
MEETING DATE: December 19,2 019
APPLICANT: Midnight Real Estate LLC
LANDOWNER: Midnight Real Estate LLC
REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for the installation of a fireplace vent
and ducting on the exterior of the building
LOCATION: 217 2nd Street North
DESIGNATION: N/A
DISTRICT: Downtown Design Review District
REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner
INTRODUCTION
During construction of the Hotel
Crosby, Midnight Real Estate LLC
acquired the property at 217 2nd Street
North to be used as a construction
headquarters. After the opening of the
Hotel Crosby, the building was
converted from the office space into a
mixed use building where guests of the
hotel were permitted to utilize the
building for private events. The
conversion requires review and
approval of a Design Permit for certain
alterations to the structure.
SPECIFIC REQUEST
217 2nd Street North (Front) — Google (2019)
Consideration of a Design Permit for:
1. The redesign of the main entrance to the building to include a recessed entryway to
accommodate an out -swinging, metal door finished in dark bronze;
2. The installation of a new metal
and glass storefront on the rear of
the building. The metal is to be
finished in dark bronze; and
3. The installation of a 20.7' by 30'
raised patio the back (easterly)
portion of the property. The patio
has been created from retaining
blocks and pavers. The patio has
a wood trellis on the southern
portion with amber colored string
lights.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND
GUIDELINES
City Code Section 31-209(f) indicates the
following applicable standards for review are:
Rear of Building (2010)
• Architectural character:
i. The suitability of the building for the intended purpose.
ii. The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines.
iii. The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development.
• Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping
of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards
and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development.
• Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources.
• Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city
council.
ANALYSIS
DETAILING, FACADE OPENINGS, AND MATERIALS
• The size and proportion of windows and
door openings...should be similar to
those on the adjacent facades.
• Facade should be composed of materials
similar to original adjacent facades.
The installation of the new door systems fit within
their respective openings. The dark bronze metal is
consistent with materials approved in the downtown
area and does not conflict with the overall design of
the building.
REAR ENTRANCES
• The rear facade entrance should be clean
and well maintained and present a
welcome appearance.
The rear portion of this building has traditionally
been a service area. The new patio helps the property
conform to this guideline.
ALTERNATIVES
HPC has alternatives related to this request.
123 2nd Street South
HPC 2019-30
Page 2 of 3
A. Approve. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District
standards the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2019-29. Staff recommends the
following conditions for approval:
1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development
Department on December 11, 2019.
2. The wheelchair lift shall be painted to match the trellis.
3. No additional exterior changes, including the installation of permanent signage, shall
be done without first being reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission.
4. HPC Design Permit approval does not constitute building permit approval. A building
permit shall be obtained prior to construction.
5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City
Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC.
Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the
Zoning Ordinance.
B. Approve in part.
C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Downtown Design
Review District standards, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the
basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would
prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year.
D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request may be
tabled to the following hearing.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds the proposed alteration is consistent with the guidelines and recommends conditional
approval of HPC Case. No. 2019-29 with the conditions outlined in Alternative A.
ATTACHMENTS
Main Entry Detail
Rear Facade and Site Plan
Patio Plan
123 2nd Street South
HPC 2019-30
Page 3 of 3
IMAGE 1 - EXISTING MAIN ENTRY
EXISTING WINDOW
LEAVE IN SITU
HISTORIC STONE SILL
EXISTING WINDOW
GYP. BOARD FINISH AT INTERIOR
NEW 2X6 STUD WALL W/ R-21
INSULATION W/ 16 GA RAW STEEL
FINISH OVER AIR BARRIER ON 3/4"
EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING AT
EXTERIOR
NEW RECESSED CEILING LIGHT ON
PHOTO SENSOR
n
II
RELOCATE EMERGENCY EXIT
SIGN ABOVE
DEMOLISHED DOOR
EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE
ON PHOTO CELL
RESTORE AND EXPOSED
EXISTING BRICK AND STONE
DETAILING
HISTORIC STONE SILL
NEW 36" MIN. DOOR AND DOOR
HARDWARE W/ 2" HM FRAME TO
MATCH EXISTING W/ PANIC
HARDWARE. NEW HM DOOR AND
FRAME TO MATCH EXISTING
STOREFRONT SYSTEM - DARK BRONZE
FINISH
MAIN ENTRY ALCOVE ENLARGED PLAN
1/2" =
EXISTING STAIR
TO REMAIN
co
L)
CV
CO
2
MAIN ENTRY ALCOVE SECTION
OWNER TO VERIFY
ATTIC ACCESS
RELOCATION
MODIFY SPRINKLER
SYSTEM
RELOCATE EXIT LIGHT
NEW RECESSED
DOWNLIGHT ON PHOTO
CELL
NEW 8' H CEILING
16 GA RAW STEEL FINISH
AT EXTERIOR W/
EXPOSED FASTENERS
POURED CONCRETE
SLAB ON EXISTING
STRUCTURE, SLOPED
1/8" PER 1'-0" TO
DRAIN, OVER 2 1/2"
MIN CONCRETE
OVER WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE ON 3/4"
PLYWOOD ON
EXISTING FLOOR
JOISTS
WOOD TRANSITION
THRESHOLD @
INTERIOR
R-38 INSULATION
INSTALL THERMAL BREAK
EXISTING STONE
FOUNDATION WALL
1/2" =
BLUE-PENCIL COLLECTIVE
226 Myrtle Street E.
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 968-4487
www.bluepencilcollective.com
THE STILLS EVENT/MEETING CENTER
217 2ND STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082
ADDENDUM 2 - HPC REVIEW
CHRIS DIEBO, MIDNIGHT REAL ESTATE LLC
(612) 987-2024
chrisbiebo@comcast.net
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
Signature: 4001-444r
Typed or Printed Name: Cynthia Marie. AIR
Date: 12/11/2019 License Number: #57314
MAIN ENTRY ALCOVE
Project number
00034.01
S
K 1
Date
12/11/2019
Drawn by
KC
Checked by
CM
Scale 1/2" = 1'-0"
Copyrighted by BLUE-PENCIL COLLECTIVE 2020
IMAGE 2 - EXISTING PATIO @ COMMERCIAL ALLEY
ST. CROIX RECREATION
PROPERTY LINE
NEW ELECTRIC TO ADA LIFT
OPTION 1: NEW ADA CHAIR LIFT
MFG: SPECTRUM
PRODUCT: AQUA BUDDY 350 POOL LIFT WITH ANCHORS
NOTES: 24" X 49.25" FOOTPRINT W/ 36" X 48" ADA CLEAR SPACE
OPTION 2: NEW ADA VERTICAL PLATFORM LIFT
MFG: ASCENSION LIFT
PRODUCT: PROTEGE
NOTES: LIFTS UP TO 42" H;
48" X 61" FOOTPRINT;
WITH OPTIONAL OUTDOOR USE PACKAGE
/ AND UPPER LANDING GATE
PROPERTY
/ /////ii//i
COORDINATE W/ XCEL ENERGY FOR REMOVAL OF
ABANDONED ELECTRIC POLE/
/ / / / / /
EXISTING FENCE
COMMERCIAL ALLE
%///////
LOWER LEVEL PATIO FUTURE LIFT ENLARGED PLAN
1/8" =
BLUE-PENCIL COLLECTIVE
226 Myrtle Street E.
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 968-4487
www.bluepencilcollective.com
THE STILLS EVENT/MEETING CENTER
217 2ND STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082
ADDENDUM 2 - HPC REVIEW
CHRIS DIEBO, MIDNIGHT REAL ESTATE LLC
(612) 987-2024
chrisbiebo@comcast.net
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state
of Minnesota.
Signature:
Typed or Printed
ame: Cynthia Marie, AIA
Date: 12/11/2019 License Number: #57314
PATIO ADA LIFT
Project number
00034.01
SK2
Date
12/11/2019
Drawn by
KC
Checked by
CM
Scale As indicated
Copyrighted by BLUE-PENCIL COLLECTIVE 2020
2ND STREET N
Group B Occupancy
R- Accesso'y Use (Sect -on 303.1.2.2)
Gross SF: 1593
OCCUPANT LOAD
Meeling Area (705 SF / xx nel)
Mechanical/S-orage (430 SF / 300 net)
TOTAL OCCUPANTS
217 2ND STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082
Lower Level Code Compliance Plan
Max, 7 peoole
Qf peoole
Max. 7 peoole
EGRESS PATH
EXISTING FENCE
ST. CROIX RECREATION
EASEMENT
CLSs S "
(LE I K - JV b if3 f. 0 occ
' v o
-NU Pov(. ics p'O'
To s T o a 05,1�.0"_)
•
PUBLI :',BHT
OF W•'
COMPLIANCE NOTES
1 Install new sp-inkier system at 'owe- level.
3 Exit discharge to public rght of way.
4 Fire separalion /05.2 miligal-on compliance to be confirmed.
5 Existing nxight of pc-io is 295" A.F.F. Ow" xr to install c 30" -sigh guardrail
6 New 36" high hamdreil with 12" extensions at botn sixes of steps
12a Install emergency exil I-ghl fixlure (w'Ik ballery backup) cl Iwo egress doors and al slcir larding on lower levelG
12 b Install exterio' light on timer or motion sensor system to he operctional curing business ho.irs
21 Install a 2" stone landing material to reduce 9" riser to 7°
COMMERCIAL ALLEY
BLUE-PENCIL COLLECTIVE 226My--IcStreet ESt'llworer,MN.,S082 6_,I-968-'1'8/ www.clucpene'Icollcctiveccm
O,ten�1 fr
r DO D
Ilwater
T F1 E 6cRIH PEA C E Of M INNE S E T A
PLANNING REPORT
TO:
REPORT DATE:
MEETING DATE:
APPLICANT:
LANDOWNER:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
DESIGNATION:
DISTRICT:
REPORT BY:
Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-30
December 13, 2019
December 18, 2019
Sara Jespersen
Judd Sather, representing Frederick Real Estate Group LLC
Consideration of a Design Permit for the installation of a fireplace vent
and ducting on the exterior of the building
123 2nd Street North
Contributing
Commercial Historic District
Downtown Design Review District
Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner
INTRODUCTION
In May of this year Sara Jespersen of
the Lumberjack Bar requested a
Design Permit for certain
modifications to the building at 123
2nd Street North. One of the exterior
modifications included the installation
of a fireplace on the inside the
building, necessitating the installation
of a fireplace vent on the east facade.
The HPC conditionally approved Case
No. 2019-06; a condition of approval
was that "any exterior venting shall be
painted to match existing stone or
brick". As noted in the May, 2019
staff report though, the fireplace may
not vent on the eastern property line.
As a result, the business has amended
the design for the fireplace vent.
Street View (Google Images — August, 2018)
SPECIFIC REQUEST
Consideration of a Design Permit for the installation of a fireplace vent and ducting on the
exterior of the building.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES
As the property has been designated as a Heritage Preservation Site due to its significance within
the Commercial Historic District, the commission's decisions must use the following
(applicable) guidelines (as found in City Code Section 22-7: Heritage Preservation Commission)
to evaluate applications for site alterations:
• The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its
environment must not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical material
or distinctive architectural features must be avoided when possible.
• Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties is not
discouraged when the alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical,
architectural or cultural material and the design is compatible with the size, scale, color,
material and character of the property.
• Whenever possible, new additions or alterations to structures must be done in a manner
that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the original structure
would be unimpaired.
Furthermore, City Code Section 31-209(f) indicates the following applicable standards for
review are:
• Architectural character:
i. The suitability of the building for the intended purpose.
ii. The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines.
iii. The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development.
• Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping
of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards
and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development.
• Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources.
• Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city
council.
ANALYSIS
The fireplace is proposed to vent out the eastern wall into an elbow and run parallel to the alley
way, affixed to the building. It will be located 10' above ground grade and painted either black
or the color of the stone, whichever the HPC prefers. At the southeast corner of the building, the
pipe will turn and run parallel to the southern wall to a point that is three feet (3') from the alley.
ALTERNATIVES
HPC has alternatives related to this request.
123 2nd Street South
HPC 2019-30
Page 2 of 3
A. Approve. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District
standards, and the standards set forth for Site Alteration Permits, the HPC should move to
approve Case No. 2019-30. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval:
1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development
Department on December 10, 2019.
2. Any exterior venting shall be painted.
3. All intrusions to the stone or brick shall sealed as to prevent water intrusion.
4. Any required bracketing or straps will be minimized and painted to match the ducting
and vent.
5. HPC Design Permit approval does not constitute building permit approval. A building
permit shall be obtained prior to construction.
6. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City
Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC.
Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the
Zoning Ordinance.
B. Approve in part.
C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Downtown Design
Review District standards, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the
basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would
prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year.
D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request may be
tabled to the following hearing.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff finds the proposed alteration is consistent with the guidelines and recommends conditional
approval of fireplace vent and ducting associated with HPC Case. No. 2019-30 with the
conditions outlined in Alternative A.
ATTACHMENTS
Design Submission (2 pages)
123 2nd Street South
HPC 2019-30
Page 3 of 3
V
6. Use appropriate length of pipe sections — telescopic or
fixed — and install. The sections which go through the
wall are packaged with the starter kit, and can be cut to
suit if necessary.
7. Guide the vent terminations 4" and 6-5/8" collars into
their respective vent pipes. Double check that the vent
pipes overlap the collars by 2" (51 mm). Secure the
termination to the wall with screws provided and caulk
around the wall plate to weatherproof. As an alternative
to screwing the termination directly to the wall, you
may also use expanding plugs or an approved exterior
construction adhesive,
Figure 3.13 - Horizontal Length Requiremen
NOTE: Support horizontal pipes ev
metal pipe straps.
Figure
-To
5' (152 cm) with
nyl Siding Wall
Cap on a Vinyl Siding Wall
Vent Termination Below Grade:
Install Snorkel Kit #SLP-SNORK when it is not possible to
meet the required vent termination clearances of 12" (305
mm) above grade level. The snorkel kit will allow installation
depth of down to 7" (178 mm) below grade level. The seven
inches is measured from the center of the horizontal vent
pipe as it penetrates the wall. If the venting system is
installed below grade, a window well must be installed
with adequate and proper drainage.
NOTE: Be sure to maintain side wall clearances and vent
run restrictions. Refer to Figures 2.3 thru 2.6.
1. Establish the vent hole through the wall.
2. Remove soil to a depth of approximately 16" (406 mm)
below the base of the snorkel. Install a window well (not
supplied). Refill the hole with 12" (305 mm) of coarse
gravel and maintain a clearance of at least 4" (102 mm)
below the snorkel, Figure 3.16.
3. Install the vent system as described in Figures 3.2 thru
3.9.
4. Be sure to make a watertight joint around the vent pipe
joint at the inside and outside wall joints.
5. Apply high temperature sealant around the inner and
outer snorkel collars. Join the pipes and fasten the
snorkel termination to the wall with the screws provided.
6. Level the soil to maintain a 4" clearance below the
snorkel.
7. If the foundation is recessed, use extension brackets
(not supplied) to fasten the lower portion of the snorkel.
Fasten the brackets to the wall first, and then fasten to the
snorkel with self -tapping #8 x 1/2" sheet metal screws.
Extend the vent pipes out as far as the protruding wall
face, Figure 3.15.
Recessed Wall
Sheet Metal
Screws and
Bracket
Wall Screws and Anchor
Anchors
Waterproof S
Around Pi
vles"c4et,.=> c),
stop
Finishing
Collar
7" Pipe
Wall Plate
Figure 3.15 Use extension brackets to
recessed wall.
unt snorkel against
19
Vermont Castings • Stardance SDDVT Installation Manual_R10 • 10/19 3-90-30007467
ERROR: ioerror
FFENDING COMMAND: ima
Pr osedtumberjack
fireplace vent
10' above grade,
3' from building and
painted black to disappear.
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MEETING DATE: December 18, 2019
REGARDING: Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Meeting in a Box
PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner
The Statewide Historic Preservation Plan (Plan) is in the process of being updated. As part of
that update process, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has requested the Stillwater
HPC devote a part of a meeting to host a Meeting in a Box. A Meeting in a Box is a small group
gathering to generate conversation and solicit feedback on the Preservation Plan for Minnesota.
The purpose is to raise awareness of the Plan and allow you to share your thoughts and
experiences that will help direct the vision and future of preservation in Minnesota.
The SHPO has provided staff with the tools to help facilitate the dialogue. Attached to this
memo are four worksheets that will be used to help guide our discussion.
PT°Jc4 Mcdahac�4�
W¢6cvai¢ 8 iRwN4 yva!
Thank you for participating in a Minnesota
Statewide Historic Preservation Plan meeting
in a box. While the Minnesota State Historic
Preservation Office leads the statewide plan
update effort, the process is dependent on
input from people like you.
Your input today will help identify issues about
historic preservation that may need to be
addressed within the updated plan. Moreover,
your voice will inform the Statewide vision
for the future of preservation in Minnesota —
along with planning goals and objectives —so
that preservation challenges can be met and
overcome at the community and state level.
We encourage you to stay involved in the plan
by visiting the MNPreservationPlan_2030
webpage and comment on the future draft.
Sincerely,
MNSHPO Statewide Historic Preservation
Planning Team
Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office
Warm-up
Answer one of the following questions:
What is one Minnesota place,
location, or site that you want
preserved in order to pass on to the
next generation?
Why do you want to get involved in
the Statewide Historic Preservation
Plan?
What is your favorite historic site?
DEPARTMENT OF
i ADMINISTRATION
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
page 1
gMdpgaR Mat:Th=1HO.
EXERCISE TASK #1
As a group, you will complete an exercise to rank the things your group sees as the biggest threats to historic
preservation.
Step 1: Review the list below and circle your
top three things you see as threats to historic
preservation. Be ready to share your votes with the
large group to inform the top three popular votes.
1. Public does not value historic preservation
highly
2. Lack of understanding of existing and
potential resources
3. Low lawmaker interest in historic
preservation
4. Economy
5. Too much emphasis on development
6. In -and -out migration of rural communities
7. Too many other priorities
8. Shifts in the state's racial and ethnic
makeup
9. Not enough people do preservation work
10. Underrepresentation of certain groups or
cultures
11. Perception that new is better than old
12. Safety concerns (code issues, school safety,
active shooter situations, etc.)
13. Natural disasters or climate change
14. Site vulnerability
15. Housing needs, including affordability
16. Gentrification and displacement
17. Public infrastructure changes and needs
18. Changes in worship, recreation,
transportation, and other cultural norms
19. Other
STEP 2: Deep Dive
After the larger group has identified the top three popular
reasons, divide up into groups of four to decide which
one of the top three you would like to discuss in-depth.
Ask your group:
Which reason will we discuss: #
"What could be done to address these
threats?"
Disscussions should last about five to ten minutes before
sharing your small group thoughts with all.
MDEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
page 2
Nacri-joEM MCDTBZ0h (WAIN".
EXERCISE TASK #2
Step 1: As a large group, rank the reasons listed
below that illustrate why historic preservation is
important:
STEP 2: Deep Dive
After the larger group has identified the top three popular
reasons, divide up into groups of two and discuss:
Rank "Which one of the three reasons most
resonates with you"
Allows for community focused public
spaces (Placemaking)
Economic vitality
Ensuring future generations have access to
historical resources
Good urban design
The ability for individuals to learn about
Minnesota's history
The ability to conduct historical research
The ability to teach others about
Minnesota's history
The preservation of cultural identity/
heritage
The preservation of sacred places or space
Other
"How can the importance of historic
preservation in the State of Minnesota be
better promoted."
rnDEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
page 3
PuggripEnia MCDfth9G110411111111
EXERCISE TASK #3
Personal reflection followed by open discussion.
Step 1: Take 3-5 minutes to reflect and write on the question:
"How could a statewide preservation plan assist you personally, your organization, or
your local government?"
Please return all your completed
worksheets to the meeting host.
Thank you.
m
DEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
page 4