Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-10-16 HPC Packet AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North October 16th, 2019 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of September 18th, 2019 regular meeting IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Case No. 2019-26: Consideration of a Design Permit for new business signage for the property located at 204 3rd St S in the RCM district. Dan Stoudt of Jassoy Block LLC, property owner and Gina Kazmerski of Image360-Woodbury, applicant. 3. Case No. 2019-27: Consideration of a Design Permit for new exterior paint for the storefront located at 224 Chestnut St E in the CBD district. Tomy O’Brien, property owner and Kathleen Schubert, applicant. VI. PUBLIC HEARING 4. Case No. 2019-24: Consideration of a Design Permit for an Infill residence at the property located at 1606 1st St N in the Neighborhood Conservation District. Zach and Meghan Hennessey, property owners. VII. NEW BUSINESS 5. Case No. 2019-25: Consideration of a Design Permit for an addition to the building located at 1862 Greeley St S. Property located in the BPI district. Washington County Historical Society, property owner. VIII. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS – NO PACKET MATERIALS 6. 2020 Preserve MN Conference Committee 7. Update on 2019-2020 Grant Projects IX. FYI 8. HPC and CC Special Joint Meeting minutes 9. HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendment Request for Proposals X. ADJOURNMENT HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING September 18, 2019 7:00 P.M. Chairwoman Mino called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Present: Chairman Mino, Commissioners Finwall, Krakowski, Larson, Thueson (arrived approximately 7:15), Walls, Council Representative Junker Absent: Commissioner Steinwall Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of August 21, 2019 Motion by Commissioner Walls, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve the minutes of the August 21, 2019 meeting with the correction of the word “worthy” in full paragraph 8 on page 2. All in favor, 5-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA There were no items on the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2019-21: Consideration of a Design Permit for a multi-tenant sign plan for the property located at 1400 (1570) Frontage Road West in the BPC District. Valley Ridge Holdings, LLC, property owner and Gordon Skamser Jr. and Francis Skamser Lewis, applicants. Ms. Wittman stated that in 1987 the City granted a variance allowing the property at 1570 Frontage Road West to have more than one business sign. In 2013 a multi-tenant sign plan was approved by the HPC and the City Council rescinded the original variance approval, clearing the title to the property for it to be subdivided to allow for the construction of the Dairy Queen building. Gordon Skamser Jr. has requested a Design Permit for the alteration of the existing multi-tenant sign plan to accommodate the installation of a new sign for Norman Quacks Chophouse. Ms. Wittman reviewed the proposed sign plan modifications. Staff has concern that the requested changes will make the plan difficult for staff to administer because there will be less clarity on how much individual signage is permitted for each elevation and zone. Also, there is concern that the proposed sign plan changes could increase visual clutter and set precedent. Francis Skamser Lewis, applicant, told the Commission they learned of the sign plan only last week. They realize some of the suggested revisions may make it more difficult for staff to enforce, and are open to discussion. Commissioner Larson asked the applicants to summarize their proposed changes. Ms. Skamser Lewis explained that their sign designer gave them the impression that the proposed Norman Quacks sign was in conformance with City ordinances. They later discovered there was a sign plan. The existing sign plan didn’t make sense because they are renting 5,000 square feet of space, 140 linear feet, compared with the average tenant who has 40 linear feet. They wanted to simplify the sign plan so that for every zone and elevation there is a maximum amount of square footage and it is up to the tenants to make Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting September 18, 2019 Page 2 of 4 sure their signs are in conformance with City code. Specifically, they removed 12a, the prohibition on signs with exposed neon/exposed bulbs, because they are not prohibited by City code, and 12e, the prohibition on exposed sign illumination or exposed sign cabinets or modules. They removed these prohibitions because they had seen those elements in existing signs that were on the property. They replaced the maximum sign square footage with a table that showed the maximum amount of square feet allowed per elevation and zone. Commissioner Larson asked how the suggested changes could be administered. Ms. Wittman said one of the largest challenges is that tenant spaces change frequently. If a particular zone is allotted 290 square feet, enforcing how that gets broken up by tenant is hard for staff to administer. The existing sign plan is one that staff uses as a model. The table clearly states what is allowed. Ms. Skamser Lewis said from a business standpoint it is very difficult to work in the old model because tenants consolidate and subdivide spaces. If you are the 5,000 square foot restaurant space, to have the same amount of signage available to you as the 50 square foot shop is inequitable; your signage is quite limited if you’re the last tenant to join your zone. Now that they understand the staff perspective, they would be open to a different plan that is reasonable and is more easily administered. Councilmember Junker noted that he opened up Anytime Fitness in 2006 with 4,600 square feet of space, then expanded gaining another 1,500 square feet but could not increase the signage. The Norman Quacks tenant space is essentially like an endcap space. Commissioner Larson suggested if the space is unique, can we address this space and still keep most of the existing sign plan in tact? Ms. Wittman replied she does not believe it is grounds for amending what looks to be complex sign language in the table - it has been easy for staff. If there is a desire to allot more signage for this tenant space then maybe there needs to be discussion of whether a new zone needs to be created. She explained that the current plan allows for three signs in that zone which runs from the right edge of one of the primary entrances to the mall, all the way to the corner, the theory being there would be a maximum of three tenant spaces. Norman Quack, the duck sign, is significantly larger than allowed and is on an architectural feature. Chairwoman Mino asked, if it were removed from the architectural feature, could it be accommodated elsewhere or is it over the square footage? Ms. Wittman replied it is over square footage for this zone. As proposed, a height variance would be required because the code does not allow the sign to go above the parapet or to obscure an architectural feature. The Planning Commission will consider the needed height variance. Ms. Skamser Lewis said their sign professional gave them 2-3 options for locations based on what he thought conformed to code. He interpreted the roofline or parapet being the top of the architectural feature rather than the line below. Another option is the space to the right, but it’s not visible from the road. They considered having the sign be smaller but visibility was a challenge. Commissioner Finwall commented that the sign is already up. It is hard for the HPC to approve a change if they don’t know if the variance will be approved by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Larson asked how did these signs get there without being reviewed by the City? Ms. Skamser Lewis said they hired a sign professional to create the signs and were under the impression that the signs complied with City code. Then they got a letter from the City notifying them of the issues. Ms. Wittman pointed out that to be compliant, they would be allowed to have 2 signs, one on each sign band façade area. The logo is the portion that is non-compliant. Chairwoman Mino said the restaurant’s signage in Forest Lake has the logo alongside the words and that could probably have been done here and not be out of compliance. Ms. Skamser Lewis replied the Forest Lake Norman Quacks location is much older. When they considered leasing the Stillwater space they had concerns that there has been a lot of turnover in that space over the Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting September 18, 2019 Page 3 of 4 years particularly with restaurants. They made a significant capital investment in signage to bring the space in line with their aesthetic and brand. They need visibility to the public. Mr. Skamser added that the restaurant in Forest Lake has been there 19 years and people still have no idea it is there. They did a bad job with signage in Forest Lake, and felt the architectural feature at this site gave the opportunity to express their individual business brand. Councilmember Junker noted everyone the City deals with would love to have as large a sign as possible. Unfortunately ordinances prohibit that. The restaurants there didn’t fail because of poor signage. It defaces the building to cover up the architectural feature. Commissioner Larson agreed that it’s a matter of being consistent. If every one of the tenants had a different sign it would be unattractive. To approve this sign would seem unfair to current tenants and does not follow the intent of the design guidelines. He would support a larger sign within the sign band, maybe consolidating the square footage area from both sides. Ms. Skamser Lewis noted that the zone and elevation includes Mongolian Barbecue, so technically Norman Quacks wouldn’t be able to have any signs. The Norman Quacks sign and the duck total 110 square feet. Ms. Wittman added that staff would interpret one of the Mongolian Barbecue signs to be illegally installed. Until early last week staff was unaware they had two signs. Chairwoman Mino agreed that the sign should be confined to the sign band area. Commissioner Larson said there is a lack of definition of the sign band. He would consider it being from the windows up. Ms. Skamser Lewis stated that they were confused by 12a and 12b because those are currently used by signs in the mall so they thought that was an antiquated gesture. It was articulated as exposed neon and theirs is not exposed. It is encased in a clear plastic cabinet. Ms. Wittman stated there is no prohibition in City code to exposed bulbs or neon, it was a condition of approval of the 1987 sign plan that was carried forward to the 2013 plan. Whether the clear plexiglass case makes it allowable or not is a great question. She suggested that staff work with the applicant on possibly amending the elevation plan for the building. She understands that the HPC is not favorable to covering up the architectural element in this location, that the HPC would like to see the logo of the duck incorporated into the business name, and is favorable to having a wider sign band in this area to accommodate the logo, and is more favorable to the duck dipping below the sign band but not going above the sign band. Commissioner Larson clarified he would support allowing the logo to go below the sign band in this one case but not rewriting it into the sign ordinance. It could be justified in this corner location. Commissioner Finwall said maybe an exception could be made for one tenant so when that tenant is no longer there it would not apply. Ms. Wittman agreed that the design permit approval could contain a condition that if the duck goes away the right to go below the sign band goes away. She would have to check this with the City Attorney. The only way to approve something for this applicant is to amend the sign plan because that is the only thing the HPC has control over. Councilmember Junker said the HPC could probably amend a certain zone. He has been in the mall 13 years and does not want to be inconsistent with other tenants. Ms. Skamser Lewis asked if the HPC would consider the sign to be exposed neon or not. Commissioner Larson replied if it’s not exposed and it’s cabineted, then it complies. Ms. Wittman asked if the HPC is OK with neon in the business district. The consensus was yes, it should all be covered, not exposed, with nothing broken or hazardous. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting September 18, 2019 Page 4 of 4 Ms. Skamser Lewis asked if it is possible to do an interim sign plan for a particular tenant, applicable to that location so long as Norman Quacks is the tenant. Ms. Wittman replied there are no provisions in the zoning code for interim sign plans. Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Thueson, to table Case No. 2019-21, Design Permit for a multi-tenant sign plan for the property located at 1400 (1570) Frontage Road West, directing staff to work with the applicant on amendments that would not jeopardize staff’s ability to administer the plan but would allow for increased signage opportunities for this business given its uniqueness All in favor, 5-0. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS HPC/City Council Workshop Feedback and Enabling Ordinance Discussion Ms. Wittman thanked the Commissioners for attending a September 10 joint City Council and HPC meeting. She was pleased to hear that the Council is willing to consider not requiring an outside consultant to do designation studies. This will allow local resources to be better utilized. Staff has direction to draft a request for proposals for a consultant to assist with ordinance amendment. A Request for Proposals will be distributed and citizens will be asked for input. Councilmember Junker added that the Council passed a 1-year moratorium on demolition applications. FYI 2019 Preserve MN Conference September 11-13 Ms. Wittman, Chairwoman Mino and Commissioner Walls reported on the State Historic Preservation Conference held in St. Cloud. She reminded the Commission that Stillwater is hosting the 2020 Conference September 16-18. She asked for volunteers to sit on the planning committee which will meet October 7. Other Ms. Wittman added the State is seeking input, via a postcard survey, to update its historic preservation plan. Northern Bedrock Preservation Corps is clearing invasive species south of St. Croix Boat and Packet and the Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse. Staff met with the Met Council’s subcommittee which praised the City’s comprehensive plan. Commissioner Larson recapped an American Institute of Architects meeting held in Stillwater. Commissioner Thueson invited Commissioners to the Washington County Historical Society’s fall dinner meeting at the new South Greeley Street history center building. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Walls, seconded by Commissioner Finwall to adjourn. All in favor, 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink, Recording Secretary PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-26 REPORT DATE: October 8, 2019 MEETING DATE: October 16, 2019 APPLICANT: Gina Kazmerski representing Image360 Woodbury LANDOWNER: Dan Stoudt representing Jassoy Block LLC REQUEST: Approval of a Design Permit for a 4.5 square foot projecting sign LOCATION: 204 3rd Street South DESIGNATION: Contributing (Jassoy Block) DISTRICT: Downtown Design Review District Stillwater Commercial Historic District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION Stoudt Law would like to place one, 4.5 square foot projecting sign on the building. The 27” tall by 24” wide 6mm aluminum sign will read “Stoudt Law Personal Injury” in a variation of blue with a white background. The business name will be painted acrylic dimensional lettering whereas the additional information will be printed on the sign. The projecting arm, installed perpendicular to the building, will be a flat black metal with Site Location (Source: CONNECT Explorer, May 2, 2018) Case no. 2019-26 Page 2 down-hanging arms which the sign panels will be adhered to; the downward-hanging arms will not be visible after sign panel installation and will secure the sign panels in a fixed position. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit for 4.5 square foot projecting sign. ANALYSIS The Downtown Design Review District (DTDRD) guidelines indicate: • The maximum area of the sin and minimum height above the sidewalk is regulated by the sign ordinance. • Use materials consistent with the period, such as wood signboards and metal brackets. The zoning code allows for projecting signs so long as they are not greater than six square feet in size. Traditional placement of projecting signs is (at least) 8’ above the sidewalk. This request is in compliance with the zoning code. The applicant is proposing an aluminum sign with acrylic dimensional lettering to be hung by a metal arm bracket, placed perpendicular to the building. The HPC has found that so long as the sign and its contents are not reflective, they substantially conform to the intent of the DTDRD guidelines. Both the zoning code and the DTDRD require multi-tenant buildings to have multi-tenant sign plans in place prior to the approval and installation of signage. While this multi-tenant building has no multi-tenant sign plan in place, no permanent signage exists on the building; at this time, this will be the only permanent sign on the building. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested Design Permit with the following conditions: Source: Google Maps/WSB (May, 2018) Case no. 2019-26 Page 3 1. The project shall be completed according to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, unless specifically modified by other conditions of approval. 2. A Design Permit for a multi-tenant sign plan shall be obtained prior to the review and Design Permit approval of any additional permanent signage. 3. All future signs shall obtain Design Permit approval to ensure conformance to the City Code, Downtown Design Review District Design Guidelines. 4. The sign and its lettering shall be non-glossy and non-reflective. 5. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the installation of new signage. B. Deny the requested Design Permit. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that, with certain conditions, the proposed request conforms to the City Code and relevant Downtown Design Review District guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends conditional approval of the Stoudt Law signage for the building at 204 3rd Street South with those conditions outline in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Narrative Request Sign and Arm Details Sign Specifications Arm Specifications cc: Gina Kazmerski Anne Stoudt October 1, 2019 Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 4th St. North Stillwater, MN 55082 To Whom it May Concern: The purpose of this letter/packet is to respectfully request the review of the attached documents in relation to a sign proposed at 204 3rd St. S., Stillwater, MN 55082 for Stoudt Law. The owner believes that the structure was built in the 1800’s but was not able to locate official documents. It is owned by one of the tenants (Dan and Anne Stoudt) and is in very good condition. The proposed sign is a simple arm sign (please see attached image) that will be attached to the building as shown on the proof. Two 6mm sign panels will be attached back to back on stable blades that hang from the cantilevered arm. Each sign panel will have a background graphic that contains the lessor design elements (tag line, bar, LTD) where the business name will be adhered to the panels in 3/8” custom painted acrylic to match the logo colors of the business, thus giving it a dimensional appearance. A similar panel is used at Revival Chiropractic (however, the Stoudt panels will be twice as thick as those used at Revival). Please advise if you should review additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Gina M.B. Kazmerski On behalf of Anne Stoudt, Stoudt Law, LTD President Image360-Woodbury 680 Commerce Drive Suite 140 Woodbury, MN 55125 PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-27 REPORT DATE: October 15, 2019 MEETING DATE: October 16, 2019 APPLICANT: Kathleen Schubert representing Medicinal Blends LANDOWNER: Tomy O’Brien REQUEST: Approval of a Design Permit to paint the tenant space LOCATION: 224 Chestnut Street East DESIGNATION: Contributing (Kalinoff Building) DISTRICT: Downtown Design Review District Stillwater Commercial Historic District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner SPECIFC REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval to paint the tenant space of the structure located at 224 Chestnut Street East, a contributing building in the Downtown Commercial Historic District. While the applicant has expressed an interest in having permanent signage, a separate Design Permit application will be submitted at a later date. The specific request includes changing the accent colors of the building from the existing orange to Sherwin Williams 6692 (Inkwell) and 9142 (Moscow Midnight), as shown on the following page. Site Location – CONNECT Explorer (May, 2018) Case No. 2019-27 Page 2 of 3 APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS The relationship of the colors and tones used on new or improved structures must be compatible with the color and tone patterns already established by adjacent buildings. The tasteful use of color and accent can introduce variety and charm, whereas the indiscriminate use of colors and color combinations can overload the senses and produce visual conflict and chaos. The goal is to achieve an area- wide complementary blend of background colors combined with selected and limited uses of primary and focal colors.  The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect.  Avoid colors which visually overpower or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established downtown color schemes as a whole. ALTERNATIVES A. Approve, whole or in part. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District standards, and the standards set forth for Design Permits, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2019-27. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and on file with HPC Case No. 2019-27. 2. Paint shall have a nonglossy (such as eggshell) finish. 3. Disturbance to the exterior wall face shall be done in a fashion as to prevent excess damage and water Street View – Google (May, 2018) Case No. 2019-27 Page 3 of 3 intrusion. All holes shall be filled and sealed. 4. Prior to painting the structure, the applicant or representative shall obtain a contractor’s license as well as any required and necessary obstruction permits. 5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Downtown Design Review District standards, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. C. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request may be tabled to the following hearing. FINDINGS The painting of a contributing building in the National Register listed Stillwater Commercial Historic District requires review. Many storefronts are all solid colors, including black, white and gray. The use of the chosen accent colors on the wooden storefront elements are in keeping with the Victorian tradition. RECOMMENDATION With certain conditions, the application does conform to the Downtown Design Review District’s guidelines. On the basis HPC Case No. 2019-27 conforms to the Downtown Design Review District standards, staff recommends conditional approval of the wall sign, painting, and light instillation at 224 Chestnut Street East. Attachments: Narrative Request cc: Kathleen Schubert Tomy O’Brien PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-24 REPORT DATE: October 3, 2019 MEETING DATE: October 16, 2019 APPLICANT: Zach and Meghan Hennessey LANDOWNER: Zach and Meghan Hennessey REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for a new residence LOCATION: 1606 1st Street North DESIGNATION: N/A DISTRICT: Neighborhood Conservation District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION Zach and Meghan Hennessey have requested Design Permit approval for the construction of a single family residence to be located on a vacant lot at 1606 1st Street North in the (Stillwater) Neighborhood Conservation District. Although the property is located in the Dutchtown Historic Preservation Planning Area, all of the homes along the 1400-1600 block of First Street North were constructed in the 1950s and 1960s, as shown on the attached Construction Year Map. The oldest home along the street, at 1406 1st Street North, is of pre-1900 construction but is located greater than 500’ away from the subject property. SPECIFIC REQUEST The specific request is for the construction of a 2.5-story single family residence with three-car, front-loaded attached garage. The house is a modern split-level design, proposed to be constructed into the slope of the property. The (front face) of the first floor will be clad in cultured stone and vertical lap siding; the remainder of the foundation will covered with 2” foam board per code and then coated with a pebble texture gray stucco. The main (second) level will be clad in 6” horizontal lap siding with smooth panel boards and 2” battens on the gabled ends. The upper level will be clad in smooth panel boards with 2” battens with shake siding on the gable ends. Case no. 2019-17 Page 2 Two 8” horizontal bands with metal drop caps will circle the home at the floor breaks. The home will have aluminum soffit and fascia boards, 4” corner and window trim boards. The front windows of the home are proposed to have an (optional) window grid design, though it is not shown on the plans; the applicant has verbally indicated the grids will not be installed. Concrete steps and an iron railing will be located at the entrance to the home where the main level deck and deck railing will be constructed of wood. The entire home will have asphalt shingles. ANALYSIS All infill homes in the NCD are required to follow the NCD design guidelines. These design guidelines recommend the following: Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. The home will have a three-story appearance from First Street North. Structures along this roadway are predominantly one- story ramblers with a few 1.5- and two-story homes mixed into the street design. To offset the additional story that can be accommodated by the grade of the property, the property owners are proposing to break the mass of the upper story by reducing it to the middle segment of the structure’s footprint. This helps create a stepped design from the adjacent structures, both located greater than 100’ from the proposed residence. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The porch is proposed to be located 30’ from the front property line, in line with the existing porch and other homes along this street front. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. Lower-pitched gabled roofs are present in the neighborhood. Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. A 12/5 pitched roof is proposed for all gables of the home. This low-pitched design helps reduce the overall height and mass of the structure. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. The property owners are proposing to construct the home into the sloping hillside. While mature trees exist on the property, the placement of the house will not impact significant trees. Any significant tree loss will be required to be mitigated. Respect the site’s natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill The structure is proposed to be constructed in the sloping hillside; hillside cuts will occur. However, as the applicant indicates, the cut is minimized by having narrow depth (apx. Case no. 2019-17 Page 3 and retaining walls. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. 28’) home facing the street. The house’s foundation will serve as a retaining wall at the back of the home but the front of the home will be predominantly exposed. The house’s stepped design, with the second story deck in front of the front façade of the house, helps create a stepped design. Building Site Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. Front-facing garages are common in this neighborhood with a three-stall garage directly across the street from the proposed home. The driveway, at the curb, is proposed to be 20’+/-; the City’s maximum driveway width is 18’ between the property line and back of curb. Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front. While a three-car garage is proposed, the property owners are proposing to step the third stall 11’ behind the front line of the two-stall portion. This helps reduce the garage mass. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. The property is greater than 22,000 square feet. The footprint of the home (approximately) 1,750 square feet. The size of the structure is compatible with the property. Additionally, there is 25’+/- drop in the slope of the property from the front to the back, therefore, the home will not appear to stand out as much as it would a flat lot. Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. A front porch, spanning half of the home on the primary level, is proposed. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. No new accessory buildings are proposed. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. With the exception of possible window grids and the combination of pebble stucco and cultured stone/exposed foundation, the proposed design conforms to this standard. Architectural Detail The façade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. The home’s details with multiple design elements is consistent with homes along this street. While this home will have greater detailing than many of the homes along the street, design components are not out of character. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. The elements of the building are in proportion to the residence, and are not in conflict with adjacent structures. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. The home’s materials, textures, and colors are consistent with patterns found in the neighborhood and on other buildings. The combination of multiple types of façade materials helps create visual interest and support the architectural style. Case no. 2019-17 Page 4 In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. However, the use of masonry and stone on a vast portion of the first floor façade will make this structure stand out within the neighborhood. When combined with the horizontal lap siding around the garage doors, the use of stone in this location is unbalanced. Use masonry and stone authentically. Stone would have traditionally only been used as a foundation element. Though the use of stone on this front-façade walkout is somewhat consistent with historic design practices, its application creates a heavy look to this three-floor structure. The heavy, unbalanced look and the fact the stone is not being carried around the entire building is not consistent with authentic applications. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: A. Approval If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposed application meets standards set forth in the Neighborhood Conservation District, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2019-24 with or without the following conditions. 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and found on file with HPC Case No. 2019-24, except as modified by conditions herein or other City of Stillwater Planning Commission and/or City Council approval. 2. Building permit applications for new structures on slopes of 12 percent or greater must include an accurate topographic map. The map must contain contours of two-foot intervals for slopes of 12 percent or greater. Slopes over 24 percent shall be clearly marked. No structure may be located on a slope of greater than 24 percent or within 30 feet of a 25 percent or greater slope, except that a structure may be administratively approved to be located within 30 feet of the toe of a slope greater than 24 percent if a soil engineer's report is submitted that documents slope stability will not be compromised by such structure. 3. Window grids, if installed, shall be installed on all windows on all four sides of the home. Grids shall be installed on the exterior of the window panes. 4. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 5. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. All lighting shall be down-lit or shielded as to have zero lumens at the lot lines. 6. A landscaping plan, to include tree replacement for the loss of any significant trees, shall be submitted at the time of the building permit. The grading escrow shall not be returned until the landscaping and trees have been installed. 7. The driveway shall be improved with concrete or asphalt, in conformance with City Code Section 33-5. The width at the curb shall conform to City Code standards. Case no. 2019-17 Page 5 8. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. C. Denial If the Heritage Preservation finds the proposal is not consistent with the, the Commission could deny the application. The Commission should indicate a reason for the denial and state whether or not the denial is with or without prejudice. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The purpose for the Conservation District and the review of the design of new structures is to help ensure the traditional neighborhood fabric is preserved. The review is intended to ensure new development does not contrast with the existing, historic character of the neighborhood it is proposed in. As noted, however, this property is not located in the heart of one of Stillwater’s historic neighborhoods. While the proposed project has been designed to fit with Stillwater’s traditional neighborhood design and serve as a standard for future new construction, certain design components will make the structure stand out along First Street North. With certain modifications, however, the design can conform to the standards set forth by City Code and associated Stillwater Conversation District guidelines. While something as minimal as window grids could potentially be overlooked, the application of stone on portions of the first floor is not authentic. The commission should discuss potential design solutions for the application of stone, potentially carrying the stone around the façade. If the commission finds a condition of approval pertaining to the stone application can be made, the commission should include that as a condition of approval. Additionally, staff would recommend conditional approval with those conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Site Location Map NCD Application Form (two pages) Certificate of Survey Site Plan Elevations (4 pages) Floor Plans (3 pages) Construction Year Map Neighborhood Photos (8 pages) cc: Zach and Meghan Hennessy Jason Timmers N BROADWAY STNORTH SECOND STREETNORTH FIRSTRIVE R HE IG HTS DRIVE E POPLAR STREET RIDGE LANE DRIVE DRIVENORTHSTREETHWYSTATESTREETNORTH MAI NRIVERCREST LN1421 1 7 1 5 51 101 6 6 1505 3051723 104 202 1605 1606 1421 1511 15041505 308 1503 14191421 1511 1422 1425 15241575 1801 1615 1509 1611 1611 141914141415 1621 1722 1721 1603 1512 1802 1710 1412 1410 1513 1406 1806 1408 µ 0 230 460115Feet General Site Location Site Location 1606 1st N ^ Te xt i SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING ,� J, jz S" HOZ BAND W/ METAL DRIP CAP .- - I.T 13..... . .. ?'...°:-I.�:�T�: T �/ ."i J. _ . p ? ' /f 4• I4. GUTTERS AND DOWN SPOUTS E' ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND FASCIA END BOX AT WALL (TYP.)?? f£ 11 - s r J..r:.:r * !• r* I:! - - .r;i..-� ,:I,: L. r I�: a ��r',-r,.l;r,r'=r ..r,rt:r�r;i.[zrr�" . .F.. gig'3 3'I'IJL': B" HOZ BAND W/ METAL DRIP CAP 6" EXPOSURE SIDING - ILfNG yQ 4" WINOOIU TRIM -- 5�;1 _ 4" CORNER BRDS. _ i5 .. 4" r B rr'Pl / 6 (POST "� I O � i� 8" HOZ BAND W/ METALDRIP CAP CONC CAP _ g CULTURED STONE FACE --- 14" RIM JOIST NOTES, , ❑❑UE00©❑ ❑❑❑❑ PROVIDE SOLID BEARING TO ALL POINT - a( aT$ E e; LOADS TO FOUNDATION.ff88 i STIMICR SUPPLIER TO VERIFY ALL STRUC❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ TURAL MEMBER BIB. ZO DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXTERIOR L J ❑ _❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LJ _ "._❑ ❑ ❑ STUDSF TO CENTER OF ON INTERIOR WALL WALLS. Q WINDOWS GIZES ARE LABELED IN FEET. M1 - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ "- ❑ ❑ W DOORS 61SSARELABELED BELE IN FEY. G-__________________________ _ _ _ J ALL HEADERS TO BE 2-7x10'S UNLESS ��/lU�� ELEVATION S"xS" BLOCK W/ Z NOTED OTHERUIBE. GONG. STEPS FRONT � Y bL� Y/ � E 0 V IRON RAILING CULTURED STONE FACE O ALL SILLS, POSTS, BEAMS AND RAFTERS TO HAVE POSITIVE CONNECTORS, PLANTER SCALE. 1/4'.I'-O" CONC. CAP LL UL ANCHORS, OR TIES PER BUILDING CODE. WINDOW GRIDS OPTIONAL ATECJ..�Ci CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD FRONT ONLY MEASUREMENTS FRIOR TO CONSTRICTION. 00 CAULK AND FLASH ALL EXTERIOR CU OPENMGB. FLASHING IS REGUIRED WERE ROOF AND VERTICAL WIRFACE6 MEET AND WHERE SIDNG MATERIALS CHANGE. �GapyRt hf. Q� QQ,,,,gg `1's a� yy Thee drewingee erg prol�cts+W under ALL Copyright laws. Thl. cirawln by Itne crncyt, dwlgn leyou6 end content within arm pr tectmd � dar all GopyrigM law.. It eamot bs reproduced in pan or M wf o by a of it'e ron Wit, dwlgn, layout, and conta+rt within otFier tMn the sole purpo.0 of Uv proJsU nem: Ileted on the uUe Ie punl.hebl* by law. Copyright Mldwwt Dretting a Dwlgn. 18x`�,d� sheetss= 4' CORNER BRDS. 4" WINDOW TRIM SMOOTH PANELS W/ 2" BATTONS 24" OC. 6x6 POST — WOOD RAILING 14" RIM JOIST S"xb" BLOCK W/ CULTURED STONE FACE _ CONC. CAP CONC. STEPS IRON RAILING -t DRIVEWAY BEYOND J ASPHALT SH 'U 5� iu I! ' Mr - o. RIDGE VENT SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING 8" HOZ BAND W/ METAL DRIP GAP 12 I I I I --------------------------------------------- RI H 9 ELEVATION SCALE. I/4".I'-V GUTTERS AND DOWN SPOUTS ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND FASCIA END BOX AT WALL (TYP.) S" NOZ BAND W/ METAL DRIP CAP 4" WINDOW TRIM 4" CORNER BRDS. 6" EXPOSURE SIDING S" NOZ BAND W/ METAL DRIP CAP 11 II no 11 �t yy I drawings are protected under ALL Copyright laws. This drawinngg by It-6 concept, daelgn, la ut, and eontent within ere protested under ell 19ht law.. It caret bs reproduced In pert or In whole. % use of It's sonsept, design, layout, aM rsntant within , then the eels purpose of the proJsct mme Ilelecl on the LIIIs Is punleheb law. CopylgM Midwest Drartkg 1 Dwlgn. 18v24 sheets 7 1 �- a I! o ' ASPHALT 9si!fY--�E9, RIDGE VENT SHINGLE SHAKE SIDING �J S" HOZ. BAND W/ METAL DRIP CAP 12 y� Tlyt;:t33 t'7' GUTTERS AND DOWN SPOUTS f l D 17a- ;.t• 7i- ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND FASCIA END BOX AT WALL (TYP.) jk rC I _ 4" CORNER BRDS. 4' WINDOW TRIM SMOOTH PANELS W/ 2" BATTONS 24" OC.'yyjjp�� e p Ir TC 2ifH Sj _ TI 24" �.caNr_ .• — � ���a �g� ® _ WOOD RAILING ................ .....'___..............._ S" HOZ. BAND W/ METAL DRIP CAP.._.___—_............_......................_..........._............_....................._..._LAI �� t 14" RIM JOIST .. ........... .... ........ ... ..... ...... _ r -g ;6 8"x8" BLOCK W/ CULTURED STONE FACEa CONC. CAP�•� r pp 4�J IRON RAILING LiL 4•i �i�_ �� `. DRIVEWAY p J _ BEYOND r------ ~ 1 > L----_______��___��___..._��--..�_ -. _,_,_�--- ------yw,_��--� L ------ W --------- W LEFT ELEVATION EGRESS � SCALE. 1/4"s1'-0' W PRO.�GT �i to IL to C Q4 �GapyRfr�h� These drewinge are protected unde ALL Copyight laws. This Gewirg� by it's t, deetgn, layout, and content within am protected under allfight Tams. It cannot, be reproduced in pen or yy '' y Design G�pt ing 4 Design in whole. ay we or it's mrncep6 design, layout, and content within OIFar then tin sops pwpaw or tin project name listed on the title a pwidra.c. �y law. Copyright Flidwset Drerung 7 Design. b lax24 sheets Man • 7eem PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-25 REPORT DATE: October 9, 2019 MEETING DATE: October 16, 2019 APPLICANT: Brent Peterson LANDOWNER: Washington County Historical Society REQUEST: Approval of a Design Permit for a 570 finished square foot entrance and exhibit area, reconfiguration of front façade openings, signage, and rooftop mechanical screening associated with a new Washington County Heritage Center LOCATION: 1862 Greeley Street South DESIGNATION: N/A DISTRICT: West Stillwater Business Park REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION Washington County Historical Society (WCHS) owns the property at 1862 Greeley Street South. The organization intends to convert the former industrial office building into a countywide heritage center which will contain exhibit galleries, a research center, a classroom, Aerial Image (CONNECT Explore, May 2018) CPC Case 2019-57 Page 2 of 5 staff offices, and archival storage. While interior changes will be extensive, exterior changes are minimal. They include the addition of a 570 finished square foot entrance and exhibit area, reconfiguration of the front façade openings, signage, and rooftop mechanical screening. SPECIFIC REQUEST WCHS is requesting approval of a Design Permit for a 570 finished square foot entrance exhibit area, façade signage, and rooftop mechanical screening. ANALYSIS The 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan has limited guidelines for the construction of new addition or for additions to existing structures. While the guidelines are minimal, “architectural consistency on all sides of the building is required in terms of colors, material and details” is required. The 570 finished square foot entryway addition will be constructed of glass at the northeast corner of the structure to help define the new entrance to the structure. The glass frames, overhang canopies and rooftop addition will all be white metal. While the addition will not be brick to match the existing structure, this was a deliberate attempt to separate the structure from other brick structures in the vicinity and to define the public entrance points. “All roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash storage areas shall be completely enclosed with building material compatible with the principle structure. Low profile self-contained mechanical units which blend in with the building design located to the side or rear of the building may be permitted”. The rooftop mechanicals are proposed to be screened Street View (Google – August, 2018) Proposed Design Rendering CPC Case 2019-57 Page 3 of 5 with industrial louvres in gray (though shown as red on the cut sheet). Additionally, an at-grade generator is proposed to be located at the rear of the building though it is not proposed to be enclosed. Instead, six bollards are proposed to separate the generator from the parking and drive areas. As this will be located along the primary pedestrian route from the parking area to the entrance to the building, an enclosure or screening should be installed. “Architectural consistency on all sides of the building is required in terms of colors, material and details”. The existing structure’s brick façade will be altered on the east (front elevation) to accommodate new, larger windows sets. However, the window opening size and total number of panes are inconsistent; this is to accommodate light access into the center gallery and classroom spaces as well as to allow for the construction of off-floor displays in the gift shop area. The applicant has additionally indicated the additional height of the northerly window opening provides a more open feeling for those approaching the new addition. The commission should discuss the window heights to determine if they should be consistent across the front façade of the existing portion of the building. Other applicable district guidelines pertaining to landscaping indicate: • All area of lot not used or improved for parking, driveways or storage areas shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, flower and ground cover. • A minimum 20-foot wide landscaped front yard setback area shall be maintained along all public streets and 10 foot side yard landscaped area maintained on all other sides. • A minimum of 10 percent of parking and driveway areas shall be landscaped with trees and shrubs. • A landscaped area equal to twice the sign are comprised of bushes or flowers shall be provided around the base of free standing signs. All existing landscaping is proposed to be preserved. Raised planter boxes will be installed along the perimeter of the entryway addition will be installed to help soften the entrance to the building. While most of the landscaping guidelines are being met, the applicant is not proposing any at-grade landscaping around the perimeter of the freestanding sign. This will need to occur. Entryway Rendering with Adjacent Window Height CPC Case 2019-57 Page 4 of 5 Signage on the property is proposed to be minimal. In addition to the 40 square foot freestanding sign, hardware for the installation of temporary signage is proposed to be installed in between the two southerly window openings. The signage size and placement is in accordance with the zoning code regulations and the district guidelines. All signage will require approved sign permits prior to the installation of temporary and permanent signage on the property. New and existing lighting has been reviewed through the Use Permit process. Proposed conditions of approval of the Use Permit are: • The LED light source for the freestanding sign’s ground mounted flood lights must be installed and aligned in a manner that prevents the LED light sources from being directly visible to passing motorists. • The wall mounted lights on the north, south and east sides of the building must have glare shields installed to obscure view of the LED light sources from all property lines. The district guidelines indicate “on-site lighting shall serve functional safety and aesthetic purposes. Overall lighting shall be directed down and shielded from adjacent properties or roadways. All lights shall be contained on the property”. Concern has been raised as to whether or not there will be sufficient parking lot lighting for public safety. A condition of approval of the Design Permit should include the requirement for installation of additional parking lot lighting if public safety becomes a concern. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Approval If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements set forth for Design Permit review and the 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan guidelines, the Commission could move to approve, with or without conditions. Recommended conditions of approval may include: 1. The project shall be completed according to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, unless specifically modified by other conditions of approval. 2. The at-grade generator proposed for the rear of the building will be enclosed or screened. If screening is proposed, screening shall be consistent with rooftop screening materials. 3. A landscaped area equal to at least twice the free-standing sign area shall be installed. 4. Sign permits shall be obtained prior to the installation of any permanent or temporary signage. 5. All lights shall be contained on the property. Submittal of a photometric analysis shall be submitted with the building permit to verify this requirement. 6. Parking lot lighting shall be installed if it is determined there are public safety concerns in the parking lot area. CPC Case 2019-57 Page 5 of 5 7. Changes to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department. Minor changes may be approved by staff where major changes must be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. B. Table If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds that the application is not complete enough to make a decision, it could continue the review for additional information. C. Denial If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposal is not consistent with the requirements set forth for Design Permit review and the 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan guidelines, the Commission could move to deny. If denial occurs, the Commission should state the reason for the denial and whether the denial is with or without prejudice. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION As indicated in the analysis, minimal alterations are proposed to occur to the building. However, there are some changes that are either not consistent with the guidelines or have not been addressed at this time. However, with certain conditions, the Design Permit application request can conform to the standards set forth for Design Permitting as well as the West Stillwater Business Park district guidelines. Therefore, staff would recommend conditional approval with those conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Narrative Request Site Plan Exterior Elevations Front Façade Rendering Rooftop Screening Level 1 Floor Plan Lighting Plan Lighting Specifications (3 pages) cc: Brent Peterson Emilie Kopp Kate Michaud PROTECT EXISTING MATURE TREES DURING RENOVATION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHARED DRIVE EXISTING BUILDING WASHINGTON COUNTY HERITAGE CENTER 1862 GREELEY STREET SOUTH STILLWATER, MN 55082EXISTING ASPHALT: MILL AND OVERLAY PROVIDED PARKING: 36 STALLS 2 ACCESSIBLE STALLS RAISED PLANTER w/ NATIVE PERENNIAL FLOWERS NEW SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL SIGN, 12'-0" x 1'-0" x 3'-4" BIKE PARKING (5) RIVER BIRCH 6" CURB, SEE CIVIL EXISTING CONCRETE PATIO, PARTIALLY TO REMAIN. SEE DEMO PLAN FOR EXTENT OF DEMOLITION. GENERATOR SCUPPER LOCATION NEW SCUPPER LOCATIONS BKR-01 BOL-01 TRASH SEE ROOF PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION GREELEY STREETACCESS EASEMENT28' - 0"DASHED LINE INDICATED FACE OF BUILDING BELOW ROOF OVERHANG. EXISTING OVERHANG TO REMAIN. EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED. SEE DEMO PLAN FOR EXTENT OF DEMOLITION. EXIT EXIT EXITEXIT EXIT EXISTING NATURAL GAS METER -TO BE SALVAGED AND REINSTALLED LOADINGLOADING CONCRETE SIDEWALK53' - 9 1/2"16' - 0 1/4"19' - 0"30' - 0"NEW ELECTRICAL METER SOCKET 246' - 5 7/8"49' - 3 5/8"453' - 7"100' - 4"EXISTING BDLG SF: 14,162 GSF ADDITION SF: 559 GSF TOTAL: 14,718 GSF TOTAL SITE SF: 80,965 GSF IMPERVIOUS SF:40,555 GSF NEW PERVIOUS SF: 2,442 GSF TOTAL: 38,113 GSF181' - 8"RTU ENCLOSURE PANELS AND STRUCTURE EXISTING RAMP AND RAILING TO REMAIN EXISTING STAIR AND TO REMAIN SALVAGED WHEEL STOPS; SEE CIVIL SCUPPER LOCATION 12' - 0"1' - 0"LEVEL 1 100' -0"1' - 7"3' - 4"10 1/8"11' - 0 5/8" 6' - 0" 12' - 0"5 7/8"CONCRETE w/ METAL STAND-OFFS; GROUND MOUNTED LIGHTING ON BOTH SIDES. SEE ELEC SITE PLAN. Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT SEAL DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. PROJECT PHASE Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Signature: Print Names: Date: License No: Paul Mellblom 26943 MSR MSR ISSUE / REVISION DATEMARK DESCRIPTION 710 South Second Street, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612. 375. 0336 9/26/2019 3:18:35 PMC:\Projects\201706_R19_Central_emilie.rvtA001 SITE PLAN 50% PRICING SET 2017065 9/11/19 Washington CountyHeritage Center1862 Greeley St SStillwater, MN 55082Architecture and Interiors Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineers MEP Associates, LLC Mattson Macdonald Young 901 N 3rd St #100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 | 651. 414. 4001 Civil Engineers BKBM Engineers 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 | 763. 843. 0420 860 Blue Gentian Rd #175 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 | 651. 414. 4001 Structural Engineers 1" = 20'-0"A001 1 SITE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A001 2 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A001 3 EXTERIOR SIGN ELEVATION NORTH / SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0"A001 4 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE - RENDER LEVEL 1 100' -0" APPROX ROOF LEVEL 113' -8" PARAPET 115' -8" 5 A201 1234567 H F B15' - 8"PROVIDE HOOKS FOR TEMPORARY SIGNAGE 14 A352 G BRICK INFILL TO MATCH, USE SALVAGED MATERIAL FROM DEMOLITION EYE SCREWS CAPABLE OF HOLDING >100 LBS 1' - 0"1' - 0" 1' - 0"1' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"0 EXIST GRAVEL STOP 114' -0" LEVEL 1 100' -0" APPROX ROOF LEVEL 113' -8" PARAPET 115' -8" 2 A201E ABCD 34 34 C 10215' - 8"122B 1 A352 EXIST GRAVEL STOP 114' -0" VERIFY WIDTH AND LOCATION WITH PREVIOUS OPENING. LEVEL 1 100' -0" APPROX ROOF LEVEL 113' -8" PARAPET 115' -8" 5 A201 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 100 D 14 A352 0 EXIST GRAVEL STOP 114' -0" LEVEL 1 100' -0" APPROX ROOF LEVEL 113' -8" PARAPET 115' -8" 2 A201 EABCD EA 116B 118 1 A352 127 EXIST GRAVEL STOP 114' -0" SALVAGED ROOF LADDER TO BE REINSTALLED IN EXISTING LOCATION LEVEL 1 100' -0" APPROX ROOF LEVEL 113' -8" PARAPET 115' -8" 2 A201A B OPEN TO ENTRY BEYOND 1' - 10"FRONT GALLERY 102 VESTIBULE 100 1 A352 EXIST GRAVEL STOP 114' -0" 1 1/8" 20' - 0" 5' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' -0" APPROX ROOF LEVEL 113' -8" PARAPET 115' -8" 5 A201 1 ENTRY 101 LOBBY 103 0 EXIST GRAVEL STOP 114' -0"Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT SEAL DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. PROJECT PHASE Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Signature: Print Names: Date: License No: Paul Mellblom 26943 MSR MSR ISSUE / REVISION DATEMARK DESCRIPTION 710 South Second Street, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612. 375. 0336 9/26/2019 3:18:40 PMC:\Projects\201706_R19_Central_emilie.rvtA201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & BUILDING SECTIONS 50% PRICING SET 2017065 9/11/19 Washington CountyHeritage Center1862 Greeley St SStillwater, MN 55082Architecture and Interiors Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineers MEP Associates, LLC Mattson Macdonald Young 901 N 3rd St #100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 | 651. 414. 4001 Civil Engineers BKBM Engineers 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 | 763. 843. 0420 860 Blue Gentian Rd #175 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 | 651. 414. 4001 Structural Engineers 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 1 BUILDING EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 3 BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 4 BUILDING WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 6 BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 5 EAST-WEST BUILDING ADDITION SECTION 1/8" = 1'-0"A201 2 NORTH-SOUTH BUILDING ADDITION SECTION Wind Speed Wall Force Horizontal Force Vertical Force HLC VLC 90 170.7 117.3 80.6 0.69 0.47 130 353.8 248.5 168.7 0.70 0.48 170 602.3 428.5 286.9 0.71 0.48 200 865.6 604.2 365.2 0.70 0.42 0.71 0.48 CATALOG NO. 450XPI Rev: JAN 2018 MODEL 450XPI STANDARD CONSTRUCTION  Material: Extruded Aluminum 6063-T6  Vertical Supports: 5” x 2” x .125” Aluminum Support Channels  Blades 4” (102mm) deep, .081” (2.1mm) nominal wall thickness  Blade Spacing: 5” (127mm) on center  Blade Angle: 40°  Finish: Mill OPTIONAL ACCESSORIES  Cap Flashing  Hinged Access Panels  Visible Mullions  Invisible Mullions for continuous blade appearance FINISHES  2 coat fluropolymer: Kynar® 500 / custom colors available in 70% PVDF (AAMA 2605). Living Building Challenge (LBC) Red List Free.  3 coat fluropolymer: Kynar 500 / Hylar 5000 custom colors available in 70% PVDF (AAMA 2605). LBC Red List Free.  Anodic finishes: Class I and Class II in Clear, Light/Medium/Dark Bronze, Champagne, and Black.  Prime coat SUGGESTED SPECIFICATIONS  General: Furnish and install where indicated on drawings 4” (102mm) Extruded Aluminum Inverted Equipment Screen Model 450XPI as manufactured by Industrial Louvers, Inc., Delano, MN.  Material: Extruded aluminum supports and blades shall be one piece 6063-T6 alloy. Vertical supports shall have a material thickness of .125” (3.2mm). Fixed inverted blades shall have a material thickness of .081” (2.1mm). Supports and blades shall be joined by stainless steel mechanical fastener.  Performance: Horizontal Load Coefficient (HLC) shall be no greater than 0.71. Vertical Load Coefficient (VLC) shall be no greater than 0.48. Equipment screen shall provide 100% visual screening from a horizontal vantage point. Free area shall be approximately 57.9%. Vertical Section Corner View Invisible Vertical Mullion VELOCITY PROFILE CFD DATA REFSB A201 3 A2011 A201 A201 6 4 2 A201 5 A2012 A301 5 A301 40' - 0"40' - 0"38' - 0"20' - 0" A503 2 A504 2 A503 9 138' - 0" E AB CD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 112 SF VESTIBULE 100 222 SF ENTRY 101 236 SF FRONT GALLERY 102 493 SF LOBBY 103 580 SF GIFT SHOP 104 333 SF RESEARCH CENTER 126 100 SF OFFICE 125 99 SF OFFICE 124 167 SF KITCHENETTE / VOLUNTEER 122 594 SF GALLERY 2 123 872 SF GALLERY 1 107 173 SF STORAGE 109 607 SF ARTIFACT STORAGE 111 1,469 SF GALLERY 3 121 1,114 SF CLASSROOM 106 215 SF WOMENS 108 212 SF MENS 110 147 SF ELEC 115 203 SF MECHANICAL 114 65 SF ACCESSIBLE TOILET 112 45 SF JANITOR 113 35 SF ENTRY 116 297 SF ISOLATION 117 339 SF RECEIVING 118 3,097 SF STORAGE 119 A503 12 14 A502 A504 6 A502 6 A505 1 10 1311 7 4 5 1 2 4 1 3 7 8 5 A502 9 12 11 10 13 16 15 14 A501 1 A50183 2 4 5 6 7 A5024 1 2 3 A501 14 A50112 13 16 15 9 10 11 3 A503 5 8 7 6 100 102 106B 110112 113 114 115 116A 117 119A 118 111 109 119B 121 122A 122B 124 125 126 107 116B A3 A F3 A6 A A3 A A6 A A6 A A3 A B3 A A3 A A3 A A3 A A3A3 A F3 F3 2 2 A3 A A3 A A3A3 A A3 A B3 A A3 A 1 1 A D C F H E 1 34 34 A151 13 A191 1 11' - 10 3/4" 16' - 0"20' - 0" 12' - 0" 12' - 0" 12' - 0"12' - 0"7' - 9 5/8"12' - 0"20' - 0"16' - 0"84' - 10 1/2"6' - 4" 11' - 6 1/2" 3' - 6" 5' - 10" 3' - 6" 24' - 11 3/8"99' - 8"1' - 1 7/8" V.I.F 3' - 4" 2' - 8 3/4" 6' - 4" 27' - 0 1/8" V.I.F 3' - 4"36' - 8"5' - 0" 24' - 3" 12' - 0" 8' - 6" 19' - 11"19' - 6" 1' - 9"12' - 3" 1' - 9" 10' - 0" 1' - 9" 5' - 6"34' - 6"6' - 3 5/8" 11' - 4 7/8" 72' - 2 5/8"6' - 4" 40' - 3 5/8"5' - 8 1/2" 12' - 10 1/4" 40' - 3 5/8"5' - 8 1/2"31' - 2 3/8" 3' - 4" 8' - 6" 6' - 4" 14' - 3 7/8" 6' - 4" 5' - 11 1/2" 1 A301 3 A301 6 A301 7 A301 4 A301 8 A301 9 A301 8' - 0"19' - 1 3/4"F3 A A3A3 A3 A F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 F1 A3 A B3 A 123 A352 8 A352 5 A352 7 A352 9 A352 13 A352 16 A352 15 A352 12 A352 11 A352 6 A352 4 A352 2 A352 3 A352 13 A552 2 A552 1 A552 3 A552 4 A552 5 A552 3 A552 4 A552 3 A552 4 A552 1 A552 3 A552 2 A552 1 1 A551 4 A551 7 A551 4 A551 10 A551 1 A301 1 A301 108 B R12 A552 6 12 A551 A352 10 G1 LOADING ZONE EXISTING ENTRY TO REMAIN GENERATOR 101 B3 A F1 F1 F1 G1 G1 G1 R12 ALIGN ALIGN ALIGN ALIGNALIGN106A TRASH G 6' - 4" GALLERY 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION BY SPLIT ROCK STUDIOS. SEE ELEC PLANS FOR LIGHTING AND POWER REQUIREMENTS. 0 F3 F1 A31 DASHED LINE INDICATES VB-3 @ TYPE B AND TYPE G WALLS DASHED LINE INDICATES VB-3 @ TYPE B AND TYPE G WALLS DASHED LINE INDICATES VB-3 @ TYPE B AND TYPE G WALLS A5053 5 6 4 41' - 0 1/4"1' - 9" 4' - 9 1/4"4' - 8 3/4"GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE CODE PLANS FOR RATED WALL & DOOR LOCATIONS. 2. DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ARE TO BOTH CENTER LINE OF WALL AND OUTSIDE OF FINISH FACE -CAREFULLY REVIEW BY LOCATION. 3. EXISTING WALLS ARE INDICATED BY DARK SHADE, NEW WALLS BY LIGHTER SHADE. 4. ALL METAL FRAMED WALLS IDENTIFIED AS ACOUSTIC ASSEMBLIES TO HAVE ACOUISTIC INSULATION (INSUL-4) EXTEND THEIR FULL HEIGHT. 5. PROVIDE IN-WALL BLOCKING/REINFORMCEMENT AS NEEDED FOR MILLWORK, SHELVING, TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES, ETC. REVIEW PLANS AND INTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 6. REFER TO A601 FOR DOOR AND DOOR FRAME TYPES. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A WEATHER TIGHT BUILDING. DETAILS AND OMISSIONS IN DRAWINGS, NOT WITHSTANDING DRAWING CONFLICTS WHICH MAY NOT ALLOW A WEATHER TIGHT CONDITION, SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF ARCHITECT. 8. PROVIDE PARTITION UP TO UNDERSIDE OF DECK ABOVE ALL GLAZING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALLOW FOR DEFLECTION AT TOP OF PORTIONS AT DECK, TYPICAL. 9. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR GLASS LOCATIONS AND GLASS PARTITION TYPES. 10. SEE MEP SHEETS FOR DEMO AND NEW SCOPE. 11. ALL PARTITIONS ARE TO UNDERSIDE OF DECK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BRING GYP FINISH UP TO DECK. ALLOW FOR DEFLECTION, FOLLOW DECK PROFILE WITH TOP OF GYP. 12. SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATION AND SIZE OF SHADES AND CURTAINS. 13. SEE RCP FOR AREAS OPEN TO EXPOSED STRUCTURE. CLEAN AND PREP DECK TO BE EXPOSED TO SPACE BELOW. REMOVE ALL UNECESSARY FASTENERS, HANGERS, PATCH AND PREP. NEW WALLS AND PARTITIONS EXISTING WALLS AND PARTITIONS WALLS AND PARTITIONS TO BE REMOVED WALL AND PARTITION KEY CMU WALLS AND PARTITIONS TO BE REMOVED Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT SEAL DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. PROJECT PHASE Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Signature: Print Names: Date: License No: Paul Mellblom 26943 MSR MSR ISSUE / REVISION DATEMARK DESCRIPTION 710 South Second Street, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612. 375. 0336 9/26/2019 3:18:38 PMC:\Projects\201706_R19_Central_emilie.rvtA101 LEVEL 1 50% PRICING SET 2017065 9/11/19 Washington CountyHeritage Center1862 Greeley St SStillwater, MN 55082Architecture and Interiors Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineers MEP Associates, LLC Mattson Macdonald Young 901 N 3rd St #100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 | 651. 414. 4001 Civil Engineers BKBM Engineers 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 | 763. 843. 0420 860 Blue Gentian Rd #175 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 | 651. 414. 4001 Structural Engineers 1/8" = 1'-0"A101 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN REFRN 109 EX FLOODLIGHT LUMINAIRE HP-1 / 19 r1 EX FLAGPOLE EX CONDUIT TO ELEC ROOM 115 NEW ELECTRICAL METER SOCKET EXISTING UTILITY TRANSFORMER EXISTING UNDERGROUND SERVICE CONDUCTORS NEW GENERATOR SEE CIVIL FOR PAD 3 2 1 AA1 HP-1 / 21 r2 NEW 1"C TO ELEC ROOM 115 NEW MONUMENT SIGN -SEE ARCHAC1 LP-1 / 25 r3 AC1-EM LP-1 / 25 r3 AC1-EM LP-1 / 25 r3 AC1 LP-1 / 25 r3 AC1 LP-1 / 25 r3 AC1 LP-1 / 25 r3 AC1 LP-1 / 25 r3 AC2-EM LP-1 / 25 r3 D2 HP-1 / 7 D2 HP-1 / 7 D2 HP-1 / 7 D2 HP-1 / 7 D2-EM HP-1 / 7 (2) D2-EM HP-1 / 7 D2-EM HP-1 / 7 (2) D2 HP-1 / 7 EXISTING LUMINAIRES TO REMAIN. REFEED FROM PANEL BRANCH CIRCUIT AS NOTED ON PLAN. PROVIDE NEW METER SOCKET AT EXTERIOR OF BUILDING. REFEED FROM EXISTING UNDERGROUND SERVICE CONDUCTORS, ROUTED FROM UTILITY TRANSFORMER ACROSS DRIVEWAY NORTH OF BUILDING. NEW ELECTRIC GENERATOR APPROXIMATE LOCATION. EC SHALL PROVIDE FOR NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD 8'-6" X 5'-4". REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION. SEE ONE-LINE DIAGRAM (E701) FOR FURTHER DETAILS ON GENERATOR EQUIPMENT. KEYED NOTES 1 2 3 1. SEE SHEET E000 FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES THAT APPLY. GENERAL NOTES A.FIXTURES SHALL BE COMPLETE WITH ALL REQUIRED MOUNTING ACCESSORIES FOR THE STYLE OF MOUNTING INDICATED. B.ALL LED DRIVERS SHALL HAVE 0-10V DIMMING CAPABILITY. C.LED PRODUCT LUMENS INDICATED ARE DELIVERED LUMENS. D.ALL EQUIVALENT PRODUCTS SHALL HAVE A LUMEN OUTPUT AND WATTAGE WITHIN 5% AS TO WHAT IS INDICATED. E.VOLTAGES ARE SHOWN FOR CIRCUITING REFERENCE. PROVIDE LUMINAIRES WITH MVOLT/UNIVERSAL VOLTAGE IF AVAILABLE. F.LUMINAIRES SCHEDULED REPRESENT BASIS OF DESIGN. PRE-BID APPROVED EQUALS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ALTERNATES WILL ONLY BE REVIEWED TO BE ACCEPTED 7 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BID DATE. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE TYPE DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER / SERIES MOUNTING TYPE LENS/REFLECTOR LIGHT SOURCE & DRIVER VOLT WATTS NOTES D2 RECESSED 4" SQUARE DOWNLIGHT POLYCARBONATE LENS, WET LOCATION RATED FOR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS SELF FLANGED, WITH BLACK TRIM GOTHAM ARCH DOWNLIGHTING -EVO 4" SQUARE OR APPROVED EQUAL RECESSED MOUNTING SEMI-SPECULAR FINISH LED -NOMINAL 2,000 LUMEN 3000K, 80 CRI 277 23.5 LUMINAIRES WITH EXTRA TYPE 'D2-EM' SHALL INCLUDE INTEGRAL 90 MINUTE BATTERY BACKUP UNIT, RATED FOR COLD WEATHER GENERAL NOTES AA1 GROUND MOUNTED FLOODLIGHT LUMINAIRE IP66 RATED FOR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS DARK BRONZE FINISH LITHONIA LIGHTING -TFX2 LED OR APPROVED EQUAL GROUND YOLK MOUNTED WIDE FLOOD DISTRIBUTION LED -NOMINAL 13,200 LUMEN 3000K, 80 CRI 277 94 AC1 WALL MOUNTED AREA LUMINAIRE IP65 RATED FOR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS DARK BRONZE FINISH LITHONIA LIGHTING -DSX2 LED OR APPROVED EQUAL WALL MOUNTED FORWARD THROW DISTRIBUTION LED -NOMINAL 6,000 LUMEN 3000K, 80 CRI 277 54 LUMINAIRES WITH EXTRA TYPE 'AC1-EM' SHALL INCLUDE INTEGRAL 90 MINUTE BATTERY BACKUP UNIT, RATED FOR COLD WEATHER AC2 WALL MOUNTED AREA LUMINAIRE IP65 RATED FOR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS DARK BRONZE FINISH LITHONIA LIGHTING -DSX1 LED OR APPROVED EQUAL WALL MOUNTED TYPE 2 SHORT DISTRIBUTION LED -NOMINAL 2,600 LUMEN 3000K, 80 CRI 277 26 LUMINAIRES WITH EXTRA TYPE 'AC2-EM' SHALL INCLUDE INTEGRAL 90 MINUTE BATTERY BACKUP UNIT, RATED FOR COLD WEATHER Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd.I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Engineer under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. ENGINEER SEAL DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO. PROJECT PHASE Drawing 2019 Copyright Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Signature: Print Names: Date: License No: ISSUE / REVISION DATEMARK DESCRIPTION 710 South Second Street, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55401 | 612. 375. 0336 9/26/2019 4:18:21 PMC:\Users\colinj\Documents\M10.19.05-WCHC-CENTRAL-MEP-R19_colinj8YN6B.rvtE101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN CITY PLANNING REVIEW 2017065 9/26/19 Washington CountyHeritage Center1862 Greeley St SStillwater, MN 55082Architecture and Interiors Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Engineers MEP Associates, LLC Mattson Macdonald Young 901 N 3rd St #100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 | 651. 414. 4001 Civil Engineers BKBM Engineers 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 | 763. 843. 0420 860 Blue Gentian Rd #175 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 | 651. 414. 4001 Structural Engineers CAJ DRD 1" = 20'-0" ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN1 TFX2 LED Rev. 09/16/19 Page 1 of 2 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-7378 • www.acuitybrands.com © 2019 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved.COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Catalog Number Notes Type Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. Introduction The TFX2 LED flood luminaire is a cost-effective, energy-efficient, long-life solution for replacing metal halide or HPS floodlights. Delivering 13,200 lumens, the TFX2 can replace up to 250W metal halide while saving 68% in energy costs. Reliable IP66 construction and excellent LED lumen maintenance will ensure a long service life; avoiding the multiple lamp changes of the metal halide luminaires they replace. The TFX2 is available with integral slip fitter and yoke mounting options. The slip fitter can be used for installation on 2 3/8” outer diameter tenons. FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The TFX2 LED floodlight is designed to provide a cost effective, energy-efficient solution for the one-for-one replacement of existing metal halide or high pressure sodium lighting. The TFX2 is ideal for replacing up to 250W HID luminaires in parking lots, signage, yards, and other floodlighting applications. TFX luminaires deliver a uniform, wide flood distribution. CONSTRUCTION The TFX2 LED floodlight features a die-cast aluminum main body with optimal thermal management that both enhances LED efficacy and extends component life. The light engines and housing are IP66 rated, and sealed against moisture or environmental contaminants. ELECTRICAL Light engine(s) configurations consist of high-efficacy LEDs and LED lumen maintenance is L90/100,00 hours. Color temperature (CCT) is 4000K with minimum CRI of 70. Electronic drivers ensure system power factor >90% and THD <20%. All luminaires have 6kV surge protection. INSTALLATION The integral slip fitter option (IS) mates with standard 2 3/8” tenons for pole-top mounting. The yoke mount (YK) option allows mounting to solid surfaces and has a 30” SO cord. TFX luminaires are suitable for aiming in any orientation. TFX is rated for installation on ground. Can be tilted from 0° horizontal facing downwards, up to 180° horizontal facing upwards. LISTINGS UL Certified to meet U.S. and Canadian standards. Suitable for wet locations. IP66 Rated. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) Premium qualified product. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org/QPL to confirm. WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/CustomerResources/Terms_and_conditions.aspx Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. TFX2 LEDFloodlights TFX2 with Slipfitter Mount Color Temp Lumen Output Input Power Efficacy (Lumens per Watt)Finish Voltage Mounting Catalog Number CI Code UPC Code 4000K 13,200 94W 140 Dark Bronze MVOLT Slipfitter TFX2 LED 40K MVOLT IS DDBXD *2552MC 193047670241 Yoke TFX2 LED 40K MVOLT YK DDBXD *2552ME 193047670234 5000K 13,200 94W 140 Dark Bronze MVOLT Slipfitter TFX2 LED 50K MVOLT IS DDBXD *2581FG 193048041545 Yoke TFX2 LED 50K MVOLT YK DDBXD *2581FK 193048041552 TFX2 with Yoke Mount Ordering Information One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2019 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 09/12/19 Page 1 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR generation 2 enabled 7 PIRHN Network, Bi-Level motion/ambient sensor 8 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (no controls) 9 PER5 Five-wire receptacle only (no controls) 9,10 PER7 Seven-wire receptacle only (no controls) 9,10 DMG 0-10V dimming extend out back of housing for external control (no controls) 11 DS Dual switching 12,13 PIRH Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enable at 5fc FAO Field Adjustable Output 14 Shipped installed HS House-side shield 15 SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 4 DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 4 L90 Left rotated optics 1 R90 Right rotated optics 1 Shipped separately BS Bird spikes16 EGS External glare shield16 DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white D-Series Size 2 LED Area Luminaire Specifications Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSX2 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The modern styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long-life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and lower power density. The Size 2 is ideal for replacing 400-1000W metal halide in area lighting applications with energy savings of up to 80% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. EPA:1.1 ft2 (0.10 m2) Length:40” (101.6 cm) Width:15” (38.1 cm) Height 1:7-1/4” (18.4 cm) Height 2: (max):3.5” Weight: 36lbs Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. W L H DSX2 LED Series LEDs Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting DSX2 LED Forward optics P1 P5 P2 P6 P3 P7 P4 P8 Rotated optics1 P10 P13 P11 P14 P12 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K T1S Type I Short T5VS Type V Very Short T2S Type II Short T5S Type V Short T2M Type II Medium T5M Type V Medium T3S Type III Short T5W Type V Wide T3M Type III Medium BLC Backlight control 2 T4M Type IV Medium LCCO Left corner cutoff 2 TFTM Forward Throw Medium RCCO Right corner cutoff 2 MVOLT 3 120 4 208 4 240 4 277 4 347 4 480 4 Shipped included SPA Square pole mounting RPA Round pole mounting WBA Wall bracket SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptor 5 RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor 5 Shipped separately KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 6 A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. H2 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2019 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 09/17/19 Page 1 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR D-Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The modern styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long-life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and lower power density. It is ideal for replacing up to 750W metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting applications with typical energy savings of 65% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. L H L H1 WW HH2 Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD DSX1 LED Series LEDs Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting DSX1 LED Forward optics P1 P4 P7 P2 P5 P8 P3 P6 P9 Rotated optics P101 P121 P111 P131 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K T1S Type I short T2S Type II short T2M Type II medium T3S Type III short T3M Type III medium T4M Type IV medium TFTM Forward throw medium T5VS Type V very short T5S Type V short T5M Type V medium T5W Type V wide BLC Backlight control 2 LCCO Left corner cutoff 2 RCCO Right corner cutoff 2 MVOLT 3 120 4 208 4 240 4 277 4 347 4 480 4 Shipped included SPA Square pole mounting RPA Round pole mounting WBA Wall bracket SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptor 5 RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor 5 Shipped separately KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 6 Specifications EPA:1.01 ft2 (0.09 m2) Length:33” (83.8 cm) Width:13” (33.0 cm) Height H1:7-1/2” (19.0 cm) Height H2:3-1/2” Weight (max):27 lbs (12.2 kg) Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR generation 2 enabled 7 PIRHN Network, high/low motion/ambient sensor 8 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 9 PER5 Five-pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 9,10 PER7 Seven-pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 9,10 DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outside fixture (for use with an external control, ordered separately) 11 DS Dual switching 12,13,14 PIR High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 15,16 PIRH High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 15,16 PIR1FC3V High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 15,16 PIRH1FC3V Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 15,16 FAO Field adjustable output 14 Shipped installed HS House-side shield 17 SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 4 DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 4 L90 Left rotated optics 1 R90 Right rotated optics 1 Shipped separately BS Bird spikes 18 EGS External glare shield 18 DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. Luminaire Type: Catalog Number (autopopulated): GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTING | 1400 Lester Road Conyers GA 30012 | P 800.315.4982 | gothamlighting.com © 2010-2013 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rev. 01/30/13. Specifications subject to change without notice.PAGE 1 OF 3 EVO-SQ-4-OPEN Gotham Architectural Downlighting LED Downlights 4” Evo® Square Open Downlight Solid-State Lighting FEATURESORDERING INFORMATIONNOTESOPTICAL SYSTEM • Self-flanged semi-specular, matte-diffuse lower reflector • Patented Bounding Ray™ optical design (U.S. Patent No. 5,800,050) • 55° cutoff to source and source image • Top-down flash characteristic MECHANICAL SYSTEM • 16-gauge galvanized steel construction; maximum 1-1/4” ceiling thickness • Telescopic mounting bars maximum of 24” and minimum of 15”, included, 4” vertical adjustment • Toolless adjustments post installation • Junction box capacity: 8 (4 in, 4 out ) 12AWG rated for 90°C • Light engine and driver accessible through aperture ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Fully serviceable and upgradeable LED light engine • 70% lumen maintenance at 50,000 hours based on IESNA LM-79-2008 • 120-277VAC, 50/60hz power supply with 0-10V dimming (10-100%); rated for 50,000-hour life • Overload and short circuit protected LISTINGS • Fixtures are CSA certified to meet US and Canadian standards; wet location, covered ceiling WARRANTY • 5-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/CustomerResources/Terms_and_conditions.aspx EXAMPLE: EVO SQ 35/10 4AR 120 Series Type Color temperature Nominal lumen values Aperture/Trim color Finish Voltage EVO SQ 27/2700 K 30/3000 K 35/3500 K 41/4100 K 06 600 lumens 10 1000 lumens 14 1400 lumens 18 1800 lumens 20 2000 lumens 4AR Clear 4PR Pewter 4WTR Wheat 4WR1 White 4BR1 Black (blank) Semi-specular LD Matte diffuse 120 277 347 Driver Options (blank)2 0-10V dimming driver. Minimum dimming level 10% ECOS23 Lutron Hi-Lume® 2-wire forward-phase dimming driver. Minimum dimming level 1% ECOS32,3 Lutron Hi-Lume® 3-wire or EcoSystem® dimming driver. Minimum dimming level 1% SF Single fuse LRC Lithonia Reloc® system TRW4 White painted flange TRBL5 Black painted flange EL6 Emergency battery pack with integral test switch ELR6 Emergency battery pack with remote test switch CP Chicago plenum NEPP Interface for Sensor Switch® nLight® network with integral power supply. Refer to TN-623-01. ACCESSORIES order as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately) ISD BC 0-10V wallbox dimmer. Refer to ISD-BC. ORDERING NOTES 1. Not available with finishes. 2. Refer to TECH-240 for compatible dimmers. 3. Not available with NEPP option. 4. Not available with white reflector. 5. Not available with black reflector. 6. For dimensional changes, refer to TECH-140. CITY OF STILLWATER REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Development of the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Enabling Ordinance Amendments Proposals Due: 12:00 p.m., November 1, 2019 RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Request Page 3 B. Objective of this RFP Page 3 C. Background Page 3 II. SCOPE OF WORK A. Overview Page 6 B. Professional Qualifications Required Page 6 C. Budget and Support Services Page 6 D. Deliverables Page 6 E. Project Work Plan and Timeline of Specific Tasks Page 6 III. PROPOSAL FORMAT A. Professional Qualifications Page 7 B. Required Proposal Contents Page 8 D. Fee Quotation Page 8 E. Optional Information Page 8 IV. RFP PROCESS A. Responders’ Questions Page 9 B. Proposal Submission Page 9 V. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION A. Overview of Evaluation Methodology Page 9 B. Evaluation Criteria Page 9 VI. REQUIRED CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 10 VII. RIGHTS RESERVED Page 11 RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF REQUEST The City of Stillwater (Stillwater), in coordination with its Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC), is seeking proposals from consultants to update the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission enabling ordinance and associated city code sections pertaining to HPC activities. B. OBJECTIVE OF THIS RFP The objective of this Request for Proposals (RFP) is to obtain proposals from, and enter into contract with, a qualified Responder(s) to perform the tasks and services set forth in this RFP. The term of any resulting contract is anticipated to run from November 4, 2019 through June 30, 2020. C. BACKGROUND To help protect the character and nature of the community and its historic resources, in 1987 the City of Stillwater developed an ordinance specifically pertaining to its Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC). The framework created remains mostly intact today with minimal modifications in the last three decades. However, certain activities of the HPC (or activities which the HPC may be required to be involved with) are also addressed in over one dozen other City Code Sections. A list of referenced City Code Sections is attached as Exhibit A. Within the municipal boundaries of the City of Stillwater, there is a National Register- listed historic district (the Stillwater Commercial Historic District), a Neighborhood Conservation District, a National-Register eligible archaeological district (the South Main Street Archeological District), a National-Register eligible Cultural Landscape District, and over one dozen structures and sites individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places, as well as numerous design review districts. In the last thirty years, the City has developed five different sets of design guidelines. While four have been adopted, only three are frequently utilized and one set of residential design guidelines has not been considered for adoption. With these guidelines in place, there are still certain designated properties, or those located in an established design review district, for which no guidelines exist. Additionally, these design guidelines are not specifically tied to the HPC’s enabling ordinance. This complex and disconnected system for the preservation of Stillwater sites and structures has made it difficult for the public to understand and for the HPC to administer. Consequently, City of Stillwater staff are challenged when assisting elected and appointed officials as well as property owners through specific application review processes and permit approvals. A complete list of all HPC-related City Code Sections, RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 4 code references, and existing and drafted guidelines is available at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/udr58o6xjyq8nl4/AABTTYBr8ibCB4DYbKctMUfaa? dl=0. On September 17, 2019 the City Council adopted a moratorium on the issuance of demolition permits for locally-designated heritage preservation sites and historic resources. The City has one year to revise demolition review processes which will be led by City staff. The final demolition review amendment will be incorporated into this HPC-enabling ordinance amendment. II. SCOPE OF WORK A. OVERVIEW In conjunction with its HPC, an outside consultant and a both small citizen advisory committee made up of business and property owners and the general public, the desire of the City is to: 1. Conduct a detailed and thoughtful review of specific City Code Sections pertaining to the Heritage Preservation Commission (listed as Exhibit A) and draft an ordinance amendment to clean up code inconsistencies, strengthen the connection between the City Code and the design guidelines, to better define HPC activities, as well as strengthen the connection between HPC activities and the City’s Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. 2. Combine all adopted and draft design guidelines into a single reference document. a. A specific goal of the reference document will tie established design guidelines to the standards set forth in the City Code. b. This will not involve significant alterations of, or additions to, previously adopted guidelines. B. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED With an understanding of Heritage Preservation Commission enabling ordinances, and a thorough knowledge of municipal codes and ordinance development, the Consultant or a member of the consulting team shall meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983). C. BUDGET AND SUPPORT SERVICES This project has been financed in part with funds provided by the Minnesota Historical Society from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund and the National Park Service’s Certified Local Government grant program, administered by the State Historic Preservation Office. A total of $26,000 will be available for all consulting services. Stillwater staff, including but not limited to the Community Development Director, City RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 5 Attorney, and City Planner will: 1. Lead the demolition review update portion of this project; 2. Serve as the primary point of contact for the consultant, coordinating correspondence between the city staff, the HPC, and members of the community; 3. Staff may also be available to assist with guideline consolidation, if needed; and 4. Administer the grant project. D. FINAL PROJECT DELVERABLES 1. Recommended ordinance revisions in electronic format. 2. Five printed copies of consolidated design guidelines. 3. One electronic copy of the of the consolidated design guidelines in MS Word format or other format, as agreed to by the City of Stillwater. E. PROJECT WORK PLAN AND TIMELINE OF SPECIFIC TASKS The process and timeline will roughly follow the following tentative timeline: 9/30/2019 – 11/1/2019 (Committee Solicitation): Staff will coordinate with the HPC to identify individuals to work with the HPC and the consultant on the enabling ordinance amendment. 9/30/2019 – 11/1/2019 (Procurement Period): Staff will develop a Request for Proposals, soliciting consultant bids on the ordinance amendment. 11/20/2019 (HPC Consultant Selection): Staff will work with the HPC on determining a consultant recommendation to the City Council. 12/3/2019 (City Council Consideration): Consultant contract anticipated to be approved by the City Council. 12/4/2019 – 1/15/2019 (Inventory): HPC, Committee and Consultant review of Stillwater preservation ordinances and design guidelines. Consultant will coordinate with the HPC and staff on at least one public visioning/listening session. 1/16/2019 – 3/2/2019 (Ordinance Drafting): Consultant develop recommendations for ordinance amendments. 3/2/2019 – 4/30/2019 (Ordinance Revision and Guideline Consolidation): HPC, City staff, members of the public, MNHS, and SHPO to review draft ordinances and work with consultant on appropriate amendments. Consultant to draft consolidated guidelines. 4/30/2019 (Final Draft Submittal): The consultant will submit final ordinance draft RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 6 and consolidated guidelines to the City. 5/20/2019 (HPC Review and Recommendation): The HPC will review the proposed ordinance amendments and consolidated design guidelines, and make a formal recommendation to the City Council. 5/27/2019 (Planning Commission Review and Recommendation): The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to review the proposed ordinance amendments and consolidated design guidelines, and make a formal recommendation to the City Council. 6/2/2019 (City Council Consideration): The City Council will hold a public hearing on the 1st reading of the proposed ordinance amendments and associated Resolution(s). 6/15/2019 (City Council Consideration): The City Council will hold a public hearing on the 2nd reading of the proposed ordinance amendments and associated Resolution(s). III. PROPOSAL FORMAT A. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 1. Provide a brief description of the consultant’s capability, history and organization. 2. State the full name and address of your organization, and the branch office or other subordinate element that will perform or assist in performing the work hereunder. Indicate whether it operates as an individual, partnership, or corporation; if as a corporation, include the state in which it is incorporated. If applicable, state whether it is licensed to operate in the State of Minnesota. 3. Identify the executive and professional personnel by skill and qualification that will be employed in the work. Show where these personnel will be physically located during the time they are engaged in the work. Indicate which of these individuals you consider key to the successful completion of the study or project. Identify major responsibilities of individuals and their respective areas of expertise. 4. Identify the name of the person designated as the contact person for this proposal with mailing address, telephone number and e-mail address. If not the contact person, include the name and phone number of person(s) in your organization authorized to negotiate/expedite the proposal contract with the City. 5. Describe how the consultant or organization is in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for history, architectural RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 7 history or historical architecture as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983. B. REQUIRED PROPOSAL CONTENTS 1. Develop a Project Work Plan and schedule for the proposal in accordance with the Overview, Timelines of Specific Tasks and Project Deliverables, above. 2. Within the schedule, identify the minimum of three site visit meetings anticipated to occur. Given the partnership, identify the location and purpose of site visit meetings with the City. 3. Identify opportunities for engagement with the City and community including conference calls with city staff. 4. Identify similar projects completed by the consultant or consulting team, including contacts that can be used for reference. C. FEE QUOTATION 1. Submit a fee proposal, which includes your firm’s “not to exceed” fee for the total project. The consultant shall provide a separate cost for each product. The quoted fee shall include estimated reimbursable fees. The quoted fee shall also include sales tax, if applicable, and provide the detail. 2. Signature of authorized firm negotiator/expeditor. D. OPTIONAL INFORMATION Include any other information that may be pertinent, but not specifically asked for elsewhere. IV. RFP PROCESS A. RESPONDERS’ QUESTIONS The Stillwater staff member listed below will be the contact for all inquiries related to this RFP. All questions or requests for information should be sent by email to: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, awittman@ci.stillwater.mn.us All inquiries received by email before 12:00 pm (noon) on October 11, 2019, will receive responses. Responses which involve an interpretation or change to this RFP will be issued by addendum, e-mailed to all parties recorded by Stillwater as having received a copy of this RFP or those who have notified the City of Stillwater of their obtaining of the RFP. All such addenda issued by Stillwater shall be considered part of the RFP. Any addenda will be issued in writing by email by 4:30 PM on October 18, 2019. This is two weeks prior to the proposal submission deadline. Only additional information provided by formal written addenda will be binding. Oral RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 8 and other interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect. B. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION To be considered, each firm must email one complete pdf copy of their proposal. The subject line of the email is to be: “Stillwater HPC Ordinance Update Proposal”. Email the proposal to Abbi Jo Wittman (awittman@ci.stillwater.mn.us). All proposals must be emailed by 12:00 PM, Friday, February 1, 2019. Proposals sent after that time will not be considered. V. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION A. OVERVIEW OF EVALUATION METHODOLOGY The proposal selected for award of the contract will not necessarily be the lowest cost. Rather, the selection will be based upon the proposal that is most responsive, responsible and the most advantageous to the City. The City intends to award a contract, subject to the terms of this RFP, to the consultant that offers the best overall value. Proposals will be evaluated based on past experience and performance, current performance capability, fees and other criteria as outlined in this document. B. EVALUATION CRITERIA Proposals will be evaluated by the City on the following: Qualifications  Consulting experiences with similar types of projects.  Demonstrated understanding of the Scope of Work.  Work experience and educational background of assigned staff members and their direct knowledge/experience specific to the Scope of Work. Proposed Project Work Plan  Overall content and concept. Cost  Overall cost, including reimbursable expenses and the ability to produce the final products within the budget limitations identified in this RFP. Time Schedule  Ability to comply with the proposed time schedule for the project. VI. REQUIRED CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. The City, or members thereof, is/are not liable for any cost incurred by Responders in the preparation and production of a Proposal. Any work performed prior to the issuance of a fully executed contract will be done only to the extent the Responder voluntarily assumes risk of non-payment. RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 9 B. All materials produced by the consultant during the course of the project will be owned by the City of Stillwater. C. The contents of this RFP and, by reference, the proposal will become a part of any subsequent formal agreement if a contract ensues. D. All information in a proposal, except fee quotation, is subject to disclosure under the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 13 “Minnesota Government Data Practices Act”. E. The consultant acknowledges that in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work on the project that no contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, by reason of race, creed, color, religion, national original, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local commission, disability, sexual orientation, or ago, discriminate against any person or person who are citizens of the United States, or resident aliens, who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. No contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in previous section, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age. F. The consultant agrees any publicity releases, informational brochures, publications, studies, reports, presentations, files, audio visual materials, exhibits, or other material prepared with grant assistance will contain the following acknowledgements: “This project has been financed in part with funds provided by the State of Minnesota from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund through the Minnesota Historical Society.” “The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Parks Service, 1849 C RFP: Stillwater HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendments, Page 10 St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20240.” VII. RIGHTS RESERVED Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the City and members thereof, reserve the right to: A. Reject any and all Proposals received in response to this RFP; B. Disqualify any Responder whose conduct or Proposal fails to conform to the requirements of this RFP; C. Waive any technicalities, informalities, or irregularities in any proposal at its sole option and discretion; D. To request clarification or additional information; E. Have unlimited rights to duplicate all materials submitted for purposes of RFP evaluation, and duplicate all public information in response to data requests regarding the Proposal; F. Select for contract or for negotiations a Proposal other than that with the lowest cost; G. Negotiate as to any aspect of the Proposal with any Responder and negotiate with more than one Responder at the same time, including asking for Responders’ “Best and Final” offers as to price, technical provisions, or both; H. To award a contract or to re-solicit proposals; I. Cancel the Request for Proposal at any time and for any reason with no cost or penalty to the City or members thereof. HPC Enabling Ordinance Amendment, Page 11 EXHIBIT A City Code Title Brief Description Section 22-7 Heritage Preservation Commission The original, but modified, HPC enabling ordinance. Addresses HPC functions, site designation, Conservation District review processes, site alterations and preservation programs. Section 31-101 Definitions The definitions found in the Zoning Code. Section 31-209 Design Permit Identifies requirements of a Design Permit, the most commonly utilized form of HPC review. Section 31-214 Sign Permit Identifies requirements of a Sign Permit. Section 31-215 Site Alteration Permit Addresses the purpose of the Site Alteration Permit and states standards for review and approval of activities. Section 31-308 RB – Two Family Residential District A zoning district which encompasses much of the old residential housing stock. It was once consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation District. Section 31-504 Bed and Breakfast Identifies standards for B&Bs and addresses requirements of the HPC. Section 31-509 Sign Regulations Indicates standard requirements for signs, including that of design review and/or design permit. Section 31-515.2 Large Projects in the CBD Zone Applicable to redevelopment of large tracks of land or buildings within the community core. References both a Design Permit and Site Alteration Permit. Chapter 34 Demolition Includes definitions relevant to Zoning. Section 41-7 Seasonal Outdoor Sales References standards for food trucks in the Downtown Design Review district. The City Code utilizes Design Review, Design Review Permit, and Design Permit rather interchangeably. The following Code Sections reference or require a design-based action though it is note determined who conducts what process for review and approval. City Code Title Section 31-303 Lakeshore Residential District Section 31-322 Campus Research Dev. District Section 31-501 Accessory Dwellings Section 31-503 Accessory Structures Section 31-512 Towers Section 31-310 Townhouse Residential District Section 31-311 Cove Townhouse Res. District Section 31-318 Village Commercial District