The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-06-03 CPC PacketP water THE BIRTH PLACE OF MINNESOTA June 3, 1992 THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1992 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET. AGENDA Approval of Minutes - May 11, 1992. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Case No. V/92-24 - Variance to the approved sign program for an internally illuminated 4' x 8" box sign for Croix Valley Glass Works in the River Heights Auto Repair Mall, 14366 North 60th Street in the Business Park Commercial District, BP-C. Croix Valley Glassworks, Applicant. 2. Case No. V/92-25 - Variance to the setback requirements for construction of a screened in porch 14 feet from the corner street (30 feet required) at 212 Deerpath in the Single Family Residential District, RA. Michael and Beverly Witt, Applicants. 3. Case No. BM/92-26 - Building Moving Permit for relocation of a two car garage from a lot located next to 1950 West Seventh Street,, St. Paul, to 726 West Linden Street in the RB, Duplex Residential District. Richard Orthmeyer, Applicant. 4. Case No. BM/92-27 - Building Moving Permit for relocation of a two car garage from 218 West Pine Street to 110 South Everett Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Carl and Kathryn Johnson, Applicants. 5. Case No. V/92-21 - A Variance for an existing six foot high cedar fence (42 inches allowed), 21 feet from the property line. The property is located at 623 West Olive Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Michelle Elliott, Applicant. (This item has been rescheduled from the previous Planning Commission meeting.) OTHER BUSINESS Input to the Levee Wall/Lowell Park Plan, Bill Sanders, City Park Consultant and Brad Bielenberg. Consideration of Zoning Amendment regulating outside music in the Downtown Area. Discussion of ravine protection regulations. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Date: May 11, 1992 Time 7 p.m. Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman Gene Bealka, Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott, Gary Funke, Rob Hamlin, Don Valsvik, and Darwin Wald Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director Ann Pung-Terwedo, Planner Absent: Angela Anderson Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Darwin Wald to approve the minutes of April 13, 1992. Seconded by Gene Bealka. Motion carried 7-0-1, Duane Elliott abstained. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No - 1 - Continuation of Special Use Permit to conduct a professional theatre with the service of coffee and dessert at 324 South Main Street (Grand Garage). Robert Halverson, applicant, appeared on his own behalf. Gene Bealka noted that the original application "guaranteed" the provision of 14 parking slots and expressed his concern that overflow parking might use the Esteban's lot. Chairman Fontaine pointed out that the parking lot was for the use of all Grand Garage businesses, not just Esteban's. Steve Russell stated it has been the City's policy to deal with (downtown) parking on a cooperative basis, and not limit start-up businesses based on parking. Darwin Wald asked Mr. Halverson if he had complied with the three conditions of approval. Mr. Halverson stated that he had not submitted the heaith and building inspection reports for the service of food as he thought the food vendor, Enos Bakery, was going to take care of that. He assurred commission members he would submit the required reports the following day. Several members complimented Mr. Halverson on his current production. Gary Funke made the motion to approve the special use permit with the three conditions as recommended; seconded by Rob Hamlin. All in favor. Case No. BM/92-2Q. Building moving permit to move a 2,000 square -foot, single-family residence from the corner of Pine and Fifth Streets to a 22,397-square-foot lot at the southeast corner of Cherry and Everett streets. Casey VanderBent and Kelly Davis, architect, appeared on behalf of the applicant, Hope House of the St. Croix Valley. Mr. VanderBent said Hope House representatives have met with neighbors to explain the site plan and plans for an addition to the residence. Mr. VanderBent said the intent is to minimize the risk to the trees on the property and to integrate the house and addition to fit the character of the neighborhood. He said later in the discussion that Hope House would work with neighbors to address any landscaping concerns. Two neighbors appeared before the commission to express their concerns. Carol Peterson asked to go on record opposed, not to Hope House, but to the placement of any kind of structure on the property. She spoke of the need to retain open space for future generations. David Vesall also stated he was opposed to any kind of structure on the property. Mr. Vesall said there was a need for Hope House, but also a need for open space and green space. Gary Funke noted the property has been sold to Hope House. Putting the property back on the tax rolls benefits everyone, he said. He agreed with the need to save the park (at Washington School) and the ravine area, but said he favored putting Hope House on the four lots in question. Rob Hamlin asked how the parcel fits in with the city's long-range plan for open space. Steve Russell stated that the matter had been referred to the Park and Recreation Commission. The Park and Recreation Commission did not feel the parcel was appropriate for city purchase at this time, Mr. Russell said. Glenna Bealka said she thought the building fits in with the neighborhood, but that it takes time to get used to change. Gary Funke made the motion to approve the building moving permit with the recommended conditions; seconded by Darwin Wald. All in favor. Case No. V/92-22. Variance to the corner sideyard setback requirement (24 feet proposed, 30 feet required) for a house on the southeast corner of Everett and Cherry Streets. Gary Funke moved to approve the variance with the recommended conditions, plus conditions for the house addition specifying the slope of the roof; use of horizontal siding; use of double -hung windows; use of similar shingles and similar colors. Seconded by Glenna Bealka. All in favor. Case No. SUP/92-14. Special use permit to construct a pool and office addition to the existing Stillwater Senior High School along with a parking lot at 523 West Marsh Street. 3 Ken Grabow appeared on behalf of the applicant, ATS & R Architects. Assistant Superintendent Ken Pedersen was also present. Mr. Grabow explained that the pool would be constructed on the west side of the building. A 68-car parking lot will be constructed for pool users; a berm planted with 24 Black Hills spruce will screen the parking area from the residences to the south. Grabow noted that the addition of a bus loop should cut down on traffic that currently accesses the area from the south. Darwin Wald questioned whether 68 spaces would be adequate where there is an overlap of pool programming. Mr. Grabow noted that people could use other on -side parking areas in addition to the designated pool parking area. Mr. Pedersen stated that doors accessible to the gymansium area would be left open as an entrance for people who might have to use other parking areas. Mr. Grabow did have a concern with a condition limiting the maximum height of parking lot light fixtures to 20 feet. Mr. Grabow said plans call for 30-foot fixtures and felt th 20-foot height limit might require the use of more fixtures. Duane Elliott moved to approve the special use permit with the recommended conditions; seconded by Gene Bealka. All in favor. Case No. V/92-16. A variance to sideyard setback requirements for the construction of a garage (20 feet required, 16 feet requested) at 726 West Linden Street. Applicant Richard Orthmeyer appeared on his own behalf. Mr. Orthmeyer explained his request to move a 24 x 24 foot detached garage onto his property. He also questioned several of the recommended conditions of approval. Specifically, he said the condition that no tres be removed would be impossible to meet; some trees would have to be removed to move the building onto the property and to conform to the required 12-foot driveway. Mr. Orthmeyer said he had no objection to paving his portion of the driveway, but felt that a more reasonable condition would be to require paving the remainder of the drive when development occurs on the other parcels the roadway accesses. As far as the condition that an existing one -stall attached garage be closed off and converted to living space, Mr. Orthmeyer said that would defeat the whole purpose of his request -- he would like to have the equivalent of a three -stall garage. Karl Ranum appeared to express the Ranums' concerns, especially about the possible loss of trees. He also told the commission that they still plan to develop the parcels they own on Williams Street when economic conditions are favorable. A lengthy discussion ensued on the recommended conditions. Chairman Fontaine questioned requiring that the driveway be paved with asphalt considering that the use of gravel driveways is fairly common. Steve Rusell pointed out that asphalt has been a condition on more recent permits, using Hope House as an example. Mr. Russell also noted that the city does not usually allow two separate garage buildings on the same property. The tendency is to turn one of the buildings into some type of business use, he said. Chairman Fontaine said that should not be a concern, 4 since the city has no way of preventing someone with a one -car garage using it for business purposes. Duane Elliott pointed out that many new homes have three -stall garages. He also said the location of the property is such that the site could allow for the requested use. After Chairman Fontaine closed the discussion, Rob Hamlin moved to approve the request, excluding conditions 1 (that the 12-foot driveway be paved with asphalt) and 3 (that no trees be removed), with the additional conditions that a large oak tree be saved; that there be no commercial use of the garage; and that an existing storage shed be removed. Don Valsvik seconded the motion. The motion failed on a 5-3 vote. (Don Valsvik, Rob Hamlin and Darwin Wald voted in favor of the motion.) Don Valsvik then made a motion to also eliminate condition 2 (that the existing garage be converted to living space); seconded by Duane Elliott. The motion passed on a 5-3 volte. (Don Valsvik, Darwin Wald and Rob Hamlin voted against the motion.) Case No. SUP/92-17. Special use permit to use an existing 7,289 square -foot medical office building at 375 East Orleans Street (Stillwater Clinic) for an office/counseling center. Richard Gager appeared on behalf of the applicant, Human Services Inc. of Washington County. He stated that in the future -- a year or more -- a modest addition is planned to the existing building if funds become available. Also appearing on behalf of HSI were Paul Wolff and Dr. Bob Butler. Dr. Wayne Carlson of Stillwater Clinic was also present. Commission memberfs felt the proposal would be a good use of the building. Gary Funke moved to approve the special use permit with the recommended conditions; seconded by Darwin Wald. All in favor. Case No. V-92: 1$. Variance to the Bluff land/Shoreland Ordinance to construct a single-family residence on slopes greater than 12 percent at 14490 Dellwood Road. Applicants Dennis Evavold and Gail Englund appeared on their own behalf. Mr. Evavold stated they were aware of the recommended conditions of approval and had no objections to the conditions. Steve Russell stated that because the proposed residence is in the Bluffland area, it requires more specific review criteria. He said he was not sure if the Department of Natural Resources would become involved in the review or not. Mr. and Mrs. Johjn Schultz, neighbors to the north side of the Evavold/Englund property, appeared to express their concern about the steep grade and possible erosion problems if the slope is disturbed. 5 Chairman Fontaine pointed out that the conditions of approval requiring the preparation of a grading/drainage/eriosion control plan represented a pretty good safeguard. Gary Funke moved to approve the variance with the recommended conditions; seconded by Gene Bealka. All in favor. Case No. V/92-21. A variance for an existing six-foot high cedar fence (42 inches allowed), 21 feet from the property line, at 623 West Olive Street. Applicant Michelle Elliott did not appear, and the case was continued until the June 8 meeting. Case No. 0-„P8192-2. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include the Brown's Creek Surface Water Management Plan and the Middle St. Croix River Surface Water Management Plan into the City of Stillwater's Comprehensive Plan. Ann Pung-Terwedo explained that the two watershed districts have been working on developing their management plans since 1986. The management plans have now been adopted. The intent is to amend Stillwater's Comprehensive Plan by taking the goals and policies from the watershed districts' management plans and applying them specifically to the City. There was a brief discussion intitiated by Rob Hamlin's concern about the problem of having policies, but no provision for enforcement. Specifically mentioned were problems with on -site septic systems in the remaining unsewered areas in the older sections of the City. Ms. Pung-Terwedo told commission members that water samples would be taken of Lily Lake, McKusick Lake and Brown's Creek this summer. She also said there are plans to meet with the Soil and Water Conservation District to determine how much of Stillwater's water contributes to Perro Creek and Perro Pond. Don Valsvik made the motion to recommend adoption of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, along with the recommendation the city look at enforcement of policies. Duane Elliott seconded the motion. All in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Just prior to adjournment, Judy Gulden appeared and made a brief statement about the importance of planning. PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/92-24 Planning Commission Meeting: June 8, 1992 Project Location: River Heights Auto Service Center Comprehensive Plan District: Business Park Zoning District: Business Park Commercial, BP-C Applicant's Name: Jim Junker, Croix Valley Glassworks Type of Application: Variance Project Description: Modification to approved sign program for shopping center to allow internally illuminated box sign. DISCUSSION: Trie request is for a four foot by eight foot, thirty two square foot, box sign on the front of the Croix Valley Glassworks building. The sign program for the Center allows one square foot of signage per building storefront or a minimum of twenty five square feet. Thirty two square feet is proposed. Maximum sign height is twenty four inches according to the criteria. The proposed box sign is four feet in height. Individual lighted letter signs are also required, not box signs. The Council granted an exception to the sign program criteria for Big Wheel Rossi. St. Croix Glassworks currently has a twelve inch individual letter sign comprised of covering a 12.5 square foot sign area. Twenty five square feet is allowed. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of new box sign, twenty five square feet maximum. ATTACHMENT:_ Plans. T CASE NUMBER V9z Caso NumberV�? `f _ �L Fee Paid -------- Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: ��I-'M 1j4' Logal Doscription of Property: Owner: Name Address . �- �_, -y _ .,. Phone. _7 Applicant (if other than owner): Name J .Y2?1� _1�2!/Y' _..�Ze!5-t'-L-L Address ��.�� _ ��__ �_'� _�__� ____ Phone: _`ma ---------- Type of Request:. ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat • ___ Special Use Permit _-_ Approval of Final Plat ___ Variance ,, ___ Other _______..___. Descrip►ion of Request: _ 1�� . _ _______ ____ _____ _ __ -____ ___ ------ 1 Signature of Applicant. ~~.. Date of Public Nearing: ___________w_____________ ._______ .-!-w_______ NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn -on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. MAY 1�'9? 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. tan PAII) 5. Street names. ,Fry (Ys7ItWArEF 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. r 3�1t w�rFt' 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho Planning Commission on ------------- (duto) subject to the following conditions:___-..____;____..N_________________-__ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to t;-;e following conditions: ___ -______I_____________________________________ Comments. (Use other side), I I0 \11,11 I 1\ ;00)\\ I\ (I IM( ()t \I). N I I\\\, "W WA $ pl� I NA 1:% V, \),I R GUSTO PARTNERS OF STILLWATER CIO KARCO CONSTRUCTION 3460 N LEXINGTON-STE 307 slioREVIEW MN 55126-8001 62 STILLWAM CITY CAR,RT SORT — C907 GUSTO PARTNERS OF SlILLWATER C,10 MAR(,(j CONSTRUCTION 3460 14 LEX114GTON-STE 307 SHOREVIEW MR 55126-8001 REAL ESTP.TE 9033.2350 33 - 03o - 20.34 -0010 PT SEI/4-$M/4 S33D0R20 DESC AS FOLL:COM AT THE S 114 CORNER I V\ I S PA)A 1) 0 rp. bl I Iv :11 :1. M lol2l NA 5 NA Comm Post-W* brand fax IrLp.,-Ismillal 1116,mo 76/1 Not P99tt- it Fro 00 Dept. rPlsartek IF al ji fox 0 (612) 484-5506 FAX# (612) 484-5701 A PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V192-25 Planning Commission Meeting: June 8, 1992 Project location: 212 Deerpath Zoning District: RA, Single Family Residential Applicant's Name: Michael & Beverly Witt Type of Application: Variance Project Description: Screen porch addition to side of house. DISCUSSION: The request is to construct a porch addition to the side of the house facing Deerpath Court. The required setback is thirty feet. The proposed setback is fourteen feet. This structure would appear close to the street as compared to other structures fronting on Deerpath Court. No special or unusual conditions are apparent from the request. The subdivision is a recent subdivision and the lot meets the lot size requirements of the district. REQUIRED FINDINGS: VARIANCE (a) There are special circumstances or conditions, fully described in the findings, applying to the land or building, for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings. (b) For reasons set forth fully in the findings, the granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or buildings and that the same is the minimum variance that will accomplish such purpose. (c) The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. In addition to considering the character and use of adjoining land and buildings and those in the vicinity, in making such finding, the City Council shall take into account the number of persons residing or working in such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the area among other considerations. RECOMMENDATION: Denial. Case Number Fee Paid ---- --------- CASE NUMBER 0J— Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FOIR Street Location of Property. _y2 ! ��Y. .�� L ______________________ Logal Doscription of Property: ________________________________________ Owner: Name __ SJ't �_�l ._ ��(--- -- -----_--_w_---_--- Address ! __� P F V_ a ------- Phone: _ J Applicant (if other than owner): Name---------------__-----_---------- Address------------------------------- Phone: _----_-----_--- Type of Request• ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat _ Variance Other ___-____------- Description of Request. __ , __- �- -- --_ -- X - — __-__ Signature of Applicant: -------------- Date of Public Nearing: --------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following:Js J 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. Vol 4. Dimensions of proposed structure.` 5. Street names.4� 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. ?. Approved ___ Denied ___ by thoPlanning Commission on ----------- (d• te) subject to the following conditions: ______ ------------------------------- --------------`.----- _r--------•-.-----.-.-__. -_.. ----_-------.--..__-- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to tine I ollowing conditions:---__-__-_---______________________--------_- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments. (Use other side), 6�, --::I Al L/ / o V A <4- aj- 7 ! 4 r water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: JUNE 4, 1992 SUBJECT: MOVING PERMIT FOR GARAGE TO 726 WEST LINDEN STREET The variance for the garage location was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council at their last meetings. The request before the Commission is to review the moving of the existing garage from St. Paul to 726 West Linden Street. Pictures of the existing garage and a description of its physical condition will be presented at meeting time. RECOMMENDATION: Review of pictures and report to determine its compatibility with the neighborhood. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 PAC 100 Case Numbor Fee Paid __- NO_ CHARGE___ CASE NUMBER Date Filed _June_3s_1992_ PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: ------ 726-West-Li nden_Street-�_--_--_----- Locgal Doscription of Proporty: ____PIN _#_11080_5510_ ------------------- Owner: Name _____ RICHARD ORTHMEYER-- - --------------------------- Address _____726 West _Linden -Street__- Phone. __439_0862---_- Applicant (if other than owner): dame __-__Ri chard-Orthmeyer_-_---_____ Address ------------------------------ Phone ----------------- Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Pic;, - Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat ___ Variance . X Other'_ B u i 1 d i ny_ M o y g____ Description of Request: ------- -------- _------------------------------ ----_------r __ a ►�_x a__ 2__�. ___ ��-------,-----_ ___------------=----- Signature of Date of Public Hearing: --------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn -on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (duce) subject to the following conditions: __----___-_______________________ -- _---__.------ -'---------r------------------------------------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------------------------ Comments. (Use other side). PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/92-16 Planning Commission Meeting: May 11, 1992 Project Location: 726 West Linden Street Comprehensive Plan District: Residential Zoning District: Duplex Residential, RB Applicant's Name: Richard Orthmeyer Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Request for Variance for corner lot setback requirement. DISCUSSION: The application is to construct a 24 foot by 24 foot free standing garage off unimproved Williams Street right -of way. The purpose of the corner lot setback requirement is to have a uniform street front setback for structures along all street faces and to provide space for parked cars in front of garages without blocking driveways. Since there are not other structures at this time along this vacant right-of-way, the need for the 20 -foot setback is reduced. A study of the development potential in this area conducted last year, when a lot across the vacant right-of-way requested access, showed there was potential for two or three lots to develop along the right-of-way. The applicant has a garage attached to the existing residence at 726 WEst Linden Street. That garage would have to be closed off and converted to living space. The applicant would have to get the approval of the City Council to use unimproved Linden Street for a driveway. FINDINGS: Conditions unique to the site - unimproved street and absence of adjacent structures make the request create a special hardship. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. There shall be no commercial use on the property. 2. The Oak tree shall not be removed for construction of the driveway or garage. 3. The applicant shall receive approval from the City Couancil to use the William Street right-of-way. 4. This driveway maybe used by Lots 6 and 7, Block 11 of Sabin's Addition for driveway access. 5. No additional residential units shall be constructed on Lots 8-9-10, Block 10 of Sabin's Addition. 6. The garden shed shall be removed. ATTACHMENT: Site Plan. PLANNING CQMMISSLON RECQMMENDATION: Approval. N. SHERBURNE N. 1 >c~ 50 { ,v `- � A N �` Ln o r 1 �^ 1 S T. 50 75 ' N j Oo D� _ m O 50 7 �' 50 50 50 7 S • 4 I� r 1 ) 1 /gyp 1 O / r 1 o � r D c GRCENLEY ST/ "J/ m / S0 IU 0 P N. WILLIAMS-7 " Si. / / 100 125 1115 CD too N. EVERETT 250 0 -ON. WILLIAM � J WK 1;5 r 150 7c 0 6� W :.n V 0 1 so N. MARS HA 0 __4 1 SO I So I I I _'.1,_ Ia -- , - 7• i � I f _FIrI i_� IT-L t I I I I—� r��•• �'--I--! '11 �I01r O ----II I 2. 1 1 1 T qj p H —._L1.:S�,c;�tc,�_. � `` • I� I—i � I ! � I I I �^ I i t I FT :�� _ 3. i I I r ter P THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING STAFF DATE: JUNE 4, 1992 SUBJECT: MOVING PERMIT FOR TWO STALL GARAGE FROM ST. MARY'S PARKING LOT TO 110 SOUTH EVERETT STREET. The request is to move the garage a couple of blocks to 110 South Everett Street. A site is shown. The garage must be set back a minimum of five feet from the rear and side lot lines and a small shed on the lot removed or attached to the new garage. The garage appears compatible with the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of request with recommendation to the City Council. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The garage must meet minimum setback requirements. 2. The small shed must be removed from the site. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 Caso Number BIJ Fee Paid CASE NUP4BER_ _ _p Date Filed _ ____ PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FOR Street Location of Property: ____1 __Sa :�{ __ ° �r `'?_____.._-______ Logal Doscription of Propertyi _____________--____________ Owner: Name Address _.� 1_ - _ _ Phone: Y 3-Z Applicant (if other than owner); Name --------------------------------- Address ------------------------------ Phone: ___----________ Type of Request.- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plc; ___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance Other__t-- . . Description oft Request. Signature of Applicant:.__ _ Data of of Public Nearing: --------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on back of ` 'I' im or t=, Cached, showing the following: 1. North direction. �1 , A S 2. Location of proposed structure on lot.; 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure.a��- 5. Street names. Location.6. 7. Otherisnformation as maybe requested. 1ZU�e Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (dUte) subject to the following conditions: ________ ---------------------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to tha following conditions: ________________________________________________ Comments; (Use other side), c6�-e 1-11 -) PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/92-21 Planning Commission Meeting: May 11, 1992 Project Location: 623 West Olive Street Comprehensive Plan District: Residential Zoning District: RB, Duplex Residential Applicant's Name: Michelle Elliott Type of Application: Variance. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for construction of a six foot tall fence, nine feet behind sidewalk along Martha Street. DISCUSSION: The request is to secure a variance for an existing a six foot tall fence. The fence is located on top of a hill approximately nine feet behind the existing sidewalk (see enclosed pictures). No special reasons for the variance were submitted with the application. RECOMMENDATION: Consideration ❑f request and review of any special circumstances. ATTACHMENT: Application. 'AC 100 CASE NUMBER Case Numbor11' Fee Paid ___ -------- Date Filed. J�Z_-_w_ PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: ________ to "rz a 1= �� r' J/ r 444 d� �cT /..-2 %LJ� 2 Logal Description of Property: ------- Owner: Name --- ��-�__--_--_-----__-- Address -- �� -_�'__ ----- Phone: __Z�� _-- Applicant (it other than owner): Name __________ Address ------------------------------ Phone ---------------- Type of Request:. ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance :__ Other -_-__-___-_----__-_ Description of Request: ------------- Signature of Applicant: Date of Public Hearing: NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form -or at- tached, showing the following: ` 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested.4 / Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho "Planning Commission on ------------- {cute) subject to the following conditions: -_________________________--____-___ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to t;,e following conditions: ----__--__-_____--_..---------------------------__ Comments: (Use other side), _ ��. III l..�. ; i- i I-.._�-- �.-.I 1�-.-�-' I..-Y..• i.---; --_ I � C _f_L,� -!3,0 / 70 AMR Ct. ' }.:�i* i1��11'''fi'•r:�r,:r•1!N(frrl�rr''� ,,�"''+°" water mom THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STAFF DATE: JUNE 4, 1992 SUBJECT: LOWELL PARK STUDY The Lowell Park and Levee Wall Study began in mid -May. Presently, historical information is being gathered along with other pertinent material from the following public and private organizations and individuals: Fire Department Parks and Recreation Department Police Department Water Department Andiamo Stillwater Yacht Club P.D. Paddy's Music on the Waterfront/Lumberjack Days Art in the Park Dock Owners Association Northern States Power Co. Mike McGuire Rivertown Trolley Downtown Council The role of you, the Planning Commission, is to review the existing land uses of Lowell Park, Mulberry Point and adjacent parking areas along with the Aiple Property and Kolliner Park. Please review the following questions and be prepared to discuss them at meeting time: 1. Are the present recreational uses of Lowell Park adequately defined? Are there other opportunities to provide additional areas for defined recreational activities? What about vendors in the Park? Should the City allow this activity? 2. What should be done with Kolliner Park? Should this property be used as part of the City's park system? What about the Aiple Property? 3. What types of land use opportunities are there for Mulberry Point? 4. Where should the Andiamo be located? Are there other possibilities for additional transient boat dockage and tour boats? Along with Consultant Bill Sanders, Brad Bielenberg, a recent graduate of the University of North Dakota, will present his under -graduate thesis project which he did on Lowell Park. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 wa-ter A THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING STAFF DATE: JUNE 4, 1992 SUBJECT: MUSIC IN DOWNTOWN At the City Council meeting of June 2, 1992, the Council directed the Planning Commission and Staff to consider a policy on exterior music in the Downtown area. This includes amplified music and live music on the street, such as a piano player. Is outdoor music a problem, and should it be regulated? CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 r a 1 water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STAFF DATE: JUNE 4, 1992 SUBJECT: RAVINE PROTECTION ORDINANCE Recently, the Community has become aware of how important the City's ravines are. This has led to a clean-up campaign to clear out much of the garbage which has been accumulating in these areas through the years. The development of housing may also negatively impact these ravines. Should we be concerned about this impact? There are development regulations which can be placed on the ravine areas to protect them. Staff will review such policies at meeting time. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121