Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-09-03 CC Agenda Packet
216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651‐430‐8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 3, 2019 SPECIAL MEETING 3:30 P.M. I.CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III.OTHER BUSINESS 1.Curling Club Facility Discussion 2.Budget Workshop IV.RECESS RECESSED MEETING 7:00 P.M. V.CALL TO ORDER VI.ROLL CALL VII.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE VIII.PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS 3.Proclamation: Oak‐Land Middle School Educator and Stillwater Area High School Girls & Boys Swim and Dive Coach Brian Luke IX.OPEN FORUM ‐ the open forum is a portion of the council meeting to address council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. the council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. X.STAFF REPORTS 4.Police Chief 5.Fire Chief 6.City Clerk 7.Community Development Dir. 8.Public Works Dir. 9.Finance Director 10.City Attorney 11.City Administrator XI.CONSENT AGENDA ‐ all items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a council member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 12.August 20, 2019 Special, Regular and Closed Session meeting minutes 13.Payment of Bills 14.Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2019‐26 to consider a Zoning Text Amendment for the creation of a Rural Residential Zoning District – Ordinance 2nd Reading 15.Denial Resolution on CPC Case No. 2019‐36 PUD Amendment, Special Use Permit, Vacation Easement, and Preliminary Plat for New England Place PID # 3003020320099 – Resolution 16.Denial Resolution on CPC Case No. 2019‐37 Variance request to the maximum allowed building coverage and a Variance to lot size for second lot – Resolution 17. HKGi Parking Capacity Study – Resolution 18. Microsoft Licensing Renewal XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS ‐ out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 10 minutes or less. 19. CPC Case No. 2019‐43 to consider a request to amend City Code Section 41‐7, Seasonal Outdoor Sales. Notice was published in the Stillwater Gazette on Friday, August 23, 2019 – Ordinance 1st Reading 20. HPC Case No. 2019‐03 to consider a request by Reid and Julie Miller, property owners, for the consideration of the residence as a locally‐designated heritage preservation site. Property located at 615 Broadway St S in the Neighborhood Conservation District. PID 2803020440059. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on Friday, July 12, 2019 – Resolution XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 21. Oak Park Heights Annexation Detachment Memorandum of Understanding – Resolution XIV. NEW BUSINESS 22. Structure at 7940 Neal Ave N – Resolution 23. Harvest Festival Event Contract and Temporary Liquor License 24. Designation Study on Accessory Structure at 116 Harriet St S 25. Declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for hearing on the 2019 Street Improvment Project – 2 Resolutions 26. Declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for hearing on the 2019 Sidewalk Improvement Project – 2 Resolutions 27. Adopting the proposed tax levy for the payable year 2020 – Resolution 28. Adopting the proposed budget for the year 2020 – Resolution 29. Setting the Truth and Taxation meeting date – Resolution XV. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS XVI. ADJOURNMENT xr *x; J 7 Ili • • J r _ri r>> i 1 71 1 11n_ ,a272 n 1 1 _,_1 1 S3111,SS ■ ✓ a ra S P N M 4 I`l'T]1 N D O 1 ■ 1_l 0 DO F r L—! Ll aq C C C C C C C E11 1 it _ 0 3 3 0 3 N 0 ll r -^ 1 I 0 II 0 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! 1 1 00 1 I - - 1 — 1 1 r I 1 0 II 0 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I 0 0 I 0II 0 1 r I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 0, 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 I I — 1 1 N N 0, 2. cn t0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cs 0 0 0 W W' c p' r i 0 - 3 0 l I I 0 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 4 4 I 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 0li 0 1 1 1 i I 011 0 I I I l l I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 t 0 I 1 L S t 0 ri 0 1 1 I l I f I 1 4 1 I 010 Tur-1-7-1 0 1 o 0 61.-LL-L 333S I 1 0 I 0 i 1 1 l 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 0 Ii 1 0 l v i 0 0 Lg 4- 0 v • v 1.+-; > D cu v _ v E o ( v L] 4--J 0 u v • 0 -3 c L c 4- c • 2 4 (13 v a v L L � c v '( E Q 4- L V cc 0 v QJ u 0_ v 0 "E'l cr) O Net Income U1 00 0] N O ,- 0) J , 7 O N Q 7 7 U 1 m U rts bA w O O 1p u1 spuesnou O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 N 0] 0 N U 0 Q N 0 O Borrowed Cash f0 Ln � c-I U O Q N CO O N o O OLn O OJ O OL tr)- m (NI N ,--1 i-I t/} t/} i/)- tn- V} ih SaNVSflOHl Operating expenses increase 3-5% . . : : . • ;14:11.!.11i:.4...TM,MMPE-1:7.4.,,...,...-.:::::::=1111 ;i.; Totals 0 kri 01 0 `O 0 CD 0 O M 0 O 0 kris 7 0 kr-; 0 kr 90,000 90,000 95,000 0 r+ N 1' N G.O. Revenue Bonds ' 0 O 00 0 O O N 0 O O N 0 O O M 0 O O M " " ' 0 O 00 l Utility Fund O CT O `O O O O O Oh O O l-- O O 85,000 90,000 90,000 O O 1,021,600 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 N O N 2025 2026 2027 2028 N O N - O i N O N O N -•tAnnu. CU 7-1 • QU u 0 C�! 0 0 O O 0 O O Z Proposed Rate Increase EA - Crn- N- Cr) LO Co oci 1.0 tt3 E!} 0 0 o co cM Lf) mot' Billed Quarterly N O N 0 (.1 r N O N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N CO N O N O d9 M co (0 ti 00 LC) 0 O) C) O EA N co 400* Ed} ti co CO Lf) 6F} Lf) O Eft ff} O) O) M tA- 00 C1) co O ti co - O N N M ffa- N CO O 41* ti co o) O 00 N ft 0 ti Fixed Charge Volume Charge 7 4-1 cn CU CC a) cu U c c LT: V) U N c 4—J CU 0 C/) MMITOM 0 0 N M N O O 0 (.6 N O N O 0 Z Cr) N LO Lf) 00 Co LO N c� ao co N- Cr) CO CO Co I` O 00 CO LC) Billed Quarterly 0) 0 71C3 CY) 0 0 0 L 0) i_ 0) 0 0) 0 O O O A O N M O 0 O N 0) 0 L!7 co 0 c, Co 0 N OS '71- O 69- - N Lf ) M co b9 Co M 00 00 O ti Co Co Co O M CO 0 ti c Q) LO O O M O 00 00 O) tft O LO O M 00 ch 00 O O cd N O O ti Fixed Charge Volume Charge Total Quarterly Sewer Bill .47jC O c� C C N (13 C0 oU .5roE • ! 4I Ero' (13 coo rO `nUCO, rp 7^ +�-' E.. C v„"Q. N� ▪ ~ J C73. U L JtaA J Qj fo N.- ++ Li2 C L Q] 0 .? .Lnc 3ma� v�C.�4-- Cu CI - To E "0 O▪ '_ L C C▪ '3C if-�CO • c L C 173 E2 "0ro j,moa c17)r fll3N N C ��. d1 i an 47. fa • �_ nt„ 1 ff C 0) /TLo 4 MV/ VJ W CN! N N e. 303 305 307 2214 N 291 Z f , r7 10, :.1 202 _y Meadow Lark Park R0P� 406 Donation �Yk •4 0.,„pi(c\ 203G (1.9) Proposed Property 1%. Proposed Remova4 l, of Existing Trees 3316y IQ ?,..).:7\j‘....-?. 2110 i''''t: °'.c):'is,Ag‘\1\ep‘00\1\1S 2109 2117 C ';'---:,••*rviit 4Q15 Z � Fri' 2108 2115 409 rn 2Qi Feet E 0 60 120 240 CITY PROPERTY !/LLI PROPOSED DONATION September 3, 2019 Dear Abbi: When the Heritage Preservation Commission considered the 615 South Broadway designation as a potential heritage preservation site, we considered what now appears to be an incomplete information about the home's early ownership. The consultant report presented to the HPC listed an 1880 construction date but did not appear to explore earlier records. The basis of an 1880 starting point may have been the South Hill Stillwater Residential Area survey study, which did not generally consult deed and assessor records for individual properties. (As you know, more recent Stillwater neighborhood studies have concluded that 19th century construction dates in the Washington County database are often inaccurate, and that consulting deeds and tax rolls is a more accurate method of establishing early homes' construction dates.) Local tradition had held the house to be the birthplace of Bing Crosby's mother Catherine Harrigan. The consultant's report briefly considered this possibility, but drew on a Crosby biographer's description of Catherine Harrigan's birthplace to conclude that "it appears that any association with Catherine Harrigan is incorrect." By looking at deed and tax records, however, more information about the property's pre-1880 history can be discovered. In 1872, Lot 16 of Block 42 was assessed as "meadow" without a structure. The day after Christmas, Crosby's grandparents Dennis and Catherine Harrigan obtained a nine month, $200 mortgage from Catholic Bishop Thomas L. Grace and used it to the empty lot for $125 (X Deeds 205, I Mortgages 377). By 1874, tax records show that Harrigan's lot on South Broadway contained a house. It's not known why Bishop Grace funded the mortgage, however the Church of St. Michael was then under construction a few blocks away, and the Crosby biography indicates that Dennis "earned a reputation as a reliable, proficient contractor and builder, specializing in church architecture." Harrigan was a native of Ireland. Like many other early Stillwater residents including his cousin William Sauntry, Harrigan moved here from the Miramichi River area of New Brunswick. While the Harrigans owned the South Broadway house, their daughter Catherine (Bing Crosby's mother) was born, in 1873. Theirs was a musical home: According to the Crosby genealogy written by Larry Crosby (Bing's oldest brother), it was Katie who advanced the family's musical calling. In his account, she "not only baked a wonderful pie, but sang like a bird, and it was common gossip when she was out rowing on the lake, that either Katie Harrigan or an angel is out there singing." Her boys were raised to be practical. In Larry's account, Dennis "wisely brought up four of his sons to be respectively [a] lather, plumber, plasterer and electrician. They could build a house or win a fight, without any outside help." Singing was a pastime, hardly a profession. Two grandchildren of Ellen Sauntry, first cousins to Dennis Jr., "won renown on the stage," to the chagrin of their parents, who considered acting "unmoral." Dennis and Catherine Harrigan sold the South Broadway property to Nels Hanson in December 1876 for $700 (1 Deeds 283). The consultant's report also concluded that the home was not significant in the evolution of the neighborhood because approximately 50 homes were constructed in the South Hill prior to 1880. An earlier 1873-74 construction date would increase the house's significance within the early growth of the neighborhood. Because the report reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office and HPC did not include this pre-1880 information, the HPC did not take it into account we recommended a denial of local designation. Though the HPC has not had an opportunity to consider this information, the City Council should be aware of it. Matt Thueson Detachment/Annexation Detachment/Annexation:A. Canvas Health Detachment/Annexation:B. Washington County Campus Detachment/Annexation:C. Lookout Trail MINN. STAT. 463 - HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION7940 NEAL AVE. NO. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESS1. Building Official’s Report.The BuildingOfficial prepares a report on the status ofthe building to present to the City Council,articulating the facts that make the buildingor property hazardous. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESSThe statute defines “Hazardous building orhazardous property” as:“any building or property, which because ofinadequate maintenance, dilapidation,physical damage, unsanitary condition orabandonment, constitutes a fire hazard or ahazard to public safety or health.” (463.15subd. 3) HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESS2. City Council’s Order.Based on theBuilding Official’s report, the City Councilthen issues an Order that the ownerscorrect or remove the hazardous conditionsor raze or remove the building and provideareasonabletimetodoso. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESS3. Service of the Order.Once approved bytheCouncil,theOrderisservedontheowners, any tenants and all lienholders inthe same manner as a civil court action.Within 20 days, the owner or a lienholdercan serve an Answer specifying any facts indispute. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESS4. Default Judgment.If no Answer is servedand the owners do not comply with thetimeframe in the Order, the City must filetheOrderwiththecourtandaskthecourtfor enforcement of the Order as a defaultjudgment. The court will hear thepresentation of evidence and affirm ormodify the Order and enter a judgment. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESS5. Contested Cases.If an Answer is served,then the action must follow the Rules of CivilProcedure, which involves discovery, trialand a judgment. If the City’s Order isupheld following a trial, the court will entera judgment and fix a time after which thebuilding must be destroyed or repaired orthe hazardous condition removed orcorrected. HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESS6. Enforcement of Judgment.If a judgmentis not complied with in the time prescribedin the Judge’s order, the City may performthe work and assess the costs as a specialassessment. The City must keep anaccurate account of the expenses incurredfrom the time the original Order was made. 7940 NEAL AVENUE NORTH TIMELINE•January 12, 2015 - Owners applied for and receiveda building permit for the construction of anaccessory structure from Stillwater Township.•July 31, 2015 - Footing inspection was conducted.•October 9, 2015 - Foundation inspection wasconducted, with minimal progress.•2015 the property is annexed into the City ofStillwater TIMELINE•May 11, 2017 – Letter to Owners that Building Permitexpired as exterior work was not completed within180 days from issuance.•June 12, 2017 – Sent an email clarifying theinformation that would be required prior to theissuance of a new building permit.•July 11, 2017 – Letter from a structural engineerconfirms the garage was framed and partiallysheathed but noted there was no sheathing on theroof and trusses. Wall studs had been exposed toweather for extended period of time. Severalstructural issues needed to be corrected. TIMELINE•July 27, 2017 – City issued a new Building Permit withan expiration date of February 4, 2018.•February 13, 2018 – Letter sent regardingincomplete and noncompliant structure andreminding that the Building Permit had expired.•March 9, 2018 – Building Permit was reopened witha requirement that a framing inspection must becompleted within 30 days.•SinceMarch9,2018, no inspections have beenrequested. TIMELINE•The City has received numerous complaints fromresidents about kids playing at the construction site.•August 7, 2019 – Building Official and ZoningAdministrator inspected the Property, took photos anddocumented several deficiencies:Structure is made of wood that has been exposed to thenatural elements without adequate protection for such anextended period of time that the Structure and its supportshave been compromised.The wood beams, trusses and plywood are fading anddilapidated, showing advanced signs of deterioration.The construction site has not been properly maintained orsecured, and given its proximity to the public street, is adanger to the life, health and safety of the public. THE PROPERTY THE STRUCTURE HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESSThe statute defines “Hazardous building orhazardous property” as:“[A]ny building or property, which because ofinadequate maintenance, dilapidation,physical damage, unsanitary condition orabandonment, constitutes a fire hazard or ahazard to public safety or health.” (463.15subd. 3) HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCESSFinding:Because of inadequate maintenance,dilapidation, and physical damage thebuilding is hazardous as defined in MinnesotaStatutes, Section 463 ORDEROrder:The Owner must complete the Structure and have itapproved by the Building Official or remove theStructure on the Property, including the foundationand footings, and re-grade the construction site tomatch the existing yard by November 9, 2019. ORDERUnless an Answer is filed within 20 days of service, ifthe Owner does not comply with this Order, authorizea motion for summary enforcement of this Order tothe District Court. ORDERIf there is no compliance, the City would beauthorized to repair or remove the building on theProperty. The cost of repair or demolition of thebuilding will be a lien against the property, which willbe levied and collected as a special assessment.All costs to enforce this Order after tonight’s meeting,can be included in the special assessment. ACTION REQUESTEDAdopt the Resolution to Order to Repair or Remove the Structure at 7940 Neal Ave. N. , with all of its supporting documentation GDO Law A- Tor;% & August 30, 2019 Mayor Ted Kozlowski City Council of the City of Stillwater Stillwater City Hall Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: The Demolition Permit Application and Demolition Designation Study concerning an accessory structure located at 116 Harriet Street North, Stillwater, Minnesota; Case No. HPC 2019-09 Mayor Kozlowski and Honorable Councilors, Please be advised that I represent Dan and Allison Boblit in this matter. On or about April 26, 2019, my clients applied for a demolition permit from the Heritage Preservation Commission ("HPC"). My client's goal is to replace a decaying and deteriorating garage with a new structure of similar size and dimension. In addition to the demolition permit request,they also requested a setback variance for the new construction. The variance was granted by the Planning Commission on July 24, 2019. On May 15, 2019, the HPC found that the garage was a historic resource and that there was a feasible alternative to demolition the HPC's decision was partially based upon the possibility that the garage had once been the workshop of Mr. David Swain, a person of some significance in Stillwater's history. Critically, the report finds that the original building permit for the garage was issued within approximately two months of Mr. Swain's death making it unlikely that he ever used the garage as a workshop. On June 4, 2019, the City Council ordered the preparation of a demolition designation study. On July 2, 2019, the City Council reconsidered that decision, but ultimately decided to uphold its initial decision to fund a demolition designation study. Based on the Council's decision, the City's chosen expert performed an evaluation of the garage to determine if it should be designated as a heritage preservation site. The expert's evaluation applied the criteria found in the City Code at section 22-7,subdivision 4. In a very thorough report, the City's chosen expert reached the conclusion that the garage does not meet any one of the seven possible criteria for local designation as a heritage preservation site. P:1E & ", 4,!L I A: E S; 4770 VV ra g' P.;r,r VV TE. B LAKE, MN 55110 P. Locr.r,)N: 3,020 H pso r,E "vC , #10 , PL ;;)t,'ri, MN 55447 TE!E,"FiCrNE: 651-426 3249 " r !E 651 426 950; Page 12 The report does find that my client's home meets the criteria for local designation. But, of course, there is no request pending to demolish the home. The fact that the home may be eligible is not relevant to the business before the City Council. This matter is before the City Council concerning the demolition of the garage only. The City Council authorized a demolition designation study which was, again, limited to the garage. While I can appreciate the thoroughness of the historical expert, the City Council may not consider denying a demolition permit due to the historical significance of the home because the home is not part of the requested demolition permit. Now that the demolition designation study is complete, the Council may now "approve" the completed designation study and accept its conclusion that the garage is not eligible for designation. City Code, § 34-4, subd. 2(2)(b)(iii)(1). Or, the Council may "deny implementation of the designation." Id. In either case,the Code requires that the demolition permit shall be issued. The City Code only allows local designation when the demolition designation study contains a finding that the structure meets at least one of the seven criteria. There is no support in the City Code for the proposition that the City Council may reject the conclusions of its own expert and continue to pursue local designation under these circumstances. Where, as here, the garage does not meet any of the seven criteria, a demolition permit must be issued. Moreover, if the City Council does not act to approve the demolition permit now, it would only serve to delay the inevitable. My understanding is that if the City Council does not grant the permit now, this matter would go before the Planning Commission and the Heritage Preservation Commission before possibly returning the City Council again. The designation study's conclusions will not change in the interim. There is no factual basis to designate the garage at 116 Harriet Street North as a heritage preservation site. My clients have been waiting for more than four months for a demolition permit. They are still hopeful that it will be possible to rebuild their garage before the long winter sets in. I respectfully request that the City Council grant them permission to do so. Thank you for your time and attention to this letter. Sincerely, GDO LAW Peter J. Frank Attorney at Law cc: Allison and Dan Boblit Korine Land, Esq., City Attorney RESOLUTION 2019- ADOPTING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR THE PAYABLE YEAR 2020 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the sum of $14,609,703 is hereby levied against all of the taxable property of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, for City purposes for the payable year 2020. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the sum of $44,400 is hereby levied against all taxable properties within the WMO (Waste Management Organization) parcel -specific taxing district of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, for City purposes for the payable year 2020. The Levy consists of the following: GENERAL TAX LEVY: DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY: $ 10,587,577 Fund Required Levy for 2020 Amount 312 G.O. Capital Outlay 2012A 375,220 314 G.O. Capital Outlay 2014A 711,418 324 G.O. Capital Outlay 2014 (Armory) 85,000 326 G.O. Capital Outlay 2016A 823,883 327 G.O. Capital Outlay 2017A 401,696 329 G.O. Capital Outlay 2009D 311,128 318 G.O. Capital Outlay 2018A 486,431 339 G.O. Capital Outlay 2019A 427.350 Subtotal $ 3,622,126 New Debt G.O. Capital Outlay 2020 400,000 Total Debt Service Tax Levy $ 4,022,126 TOTAL TAX LEVY $ 14,609,703 PARCEL -SPECIFIC LEVY WMO Levy $44,400 Adopted by the Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST Beth Wolf, City Clerk Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2019- ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE YEAR 2020 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the proposed budget appropriations for the year 2020 in the amounts for the following funds: Fund Fund Name Amount 100 General Fund $ 14,776,205 200 Special Events Fund 73,000 202 St Croix Valley Recreation Center Fund 1,724,786 230 Library Fund 1,485,820 240 Parks Fund 1,068,275 251 Downtown Beautification Fund 15,000 255 Washington County Recycling Fund 35,260 285 Lodging Tax 209,222 Total $ 19,387,568 Adopted by the Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk Page 1 LIST OF BILLS Action Rental Inc.Equipment repair charges 221.00 Advance Auto Parts Supplies 469.69 Amano McGann Inc Equipment repair charges 1,133.00 Amdahl Locksmith Inc Chris Lock repair 194.50 Anchor Block Company Crack sealing project 669.00 Aspen Mills Uniforms 265.00 Beacon Athletics Park equipment 722.68 BHE Community Solar Solar Energy 6,321.91 Blue Tarp Financial Supplies 25.97 Board of Water Commissioners WAC Charges 6,831.00 Bolton and Menk Inc.Lift station repair 803.50 Brock White Co. LLC Road sealant 7,135.92 Brueghel Judith Reimburse for shipping 13.00 Burks Tree and Landscape Care Tree Care 1,903.00 CDW Government Inc.Supplies 599.30 Century Power Equipment Equipment repair supplies 36.78 Cintas Corporation Uniform & mat cleaning 578.70 Cities Digital Solutions Records retention 721.35 Cole Papers Supplies 393.93 Core & Main Storm sewer repair supplies 522.02 Dalco Janitorial supplies 195.08 Davids Hydro Vac Hydro vac services 1,670.50 Door Service Company Handicap push plate repair 354.00 ECM Publishers Publications 114.00 Fire Safety U.S.A.Streamlight LED Survivor 550.00 FleetPride Mower PTO shaft 1,723.86 Fleischhaker Dave Reimburse for work boots 159.99 Foremost Promotions Fire education materials 1,351.28 Frontier Ag & Turf - Rentals 400 gal water tank for truck 5,105.00 Gertens Wholesale Athletic mix 1,864.25 Goodyear Commercial Tire Tires 524.18 Graci Leadership Solutions LLC Supervision fundamentals 1,250.00 Grainger Equipment repair supplies 354.98 Greiner Michael Reimburse for mileage 165.18 Heritage Embroidery & Design Uniforms 39.96 Heritage Printing Inc.Parking enforcement door hangers 224.30 Hull ADR Services David Hoover vs City 1,225.00 Inspectron Inc Plan Review 27,950.00 Kuehn Michael Reimburse for work boots 160.00 Loffler Companies IT Professional Services 785.00 Madden Galanter Hansen LLP Labor Relations Services 48.00 MailFinance Inc Postage machine lease 455.01 Mansfield Oil Company Fuel 12,379.15 Marshall Electric Company Palmer Park meter 150.00 Melstrom Jeff Reimburse for work boots 160.00 Page 2 Menards Supplies 3,496.90 Metropolitan Council Monthly SAC 13,305.90 Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors Maintenance agreement 1,963.00 MN Rural Water Association Operator Expo 600.00 Modern Heating & Air MUA Public Works 340.00 MTI Distributing Equipment repairs supplies 336.55 My Alarm Center Alarm Monitoring Services 105.12 Nagell Appraisal 2019 Street Improvement 9,000.00 National Fire Protection Association Fire education banners and brochures 355.55 Northland Appliance Service Repair 183.45 O'Reilly Auto Parts Flasher for gate 20.89 Pearson Bros. Inc.Materials for seal coat project 41,791.00 Quill Corporation Office supplies 137.44 Reedy Jennifer Ford Refund of parking ramp permits 100.00 River Valley Printing Inc.Business cards 39.00 Robole Donna Reimburse for MPELRA conference expenses 556.20 Roettger Welding Inc.Fence 800.00 Service on a Shoestring Recycling Coordinator Services 10,596.00 SF Mobile Vision Car video system 4,608.00 Sherwin Williams Paint 633.47 SHI International Corp Software maintenance agreements 2,543.00 Simplifile LC Filing fee 100.00 SiteOne Landscape Supply Outdoor controller 256.53 St. Croix Boat and Packet Co.Ramp cleaning 810.00 St. Croix Recreation Fun Playgrounds Park equipment 1,268.00 State Historic Preservation Office SHPO Conference 300.00 Stillwater Motor Company Vehicle service 50.38 Sun Control of MN Sun control window film 19,794.00 T.A. Schifsky and Sons Asphalt 607.02 Tait Graham E Reimburse for lodging for APA conference 127.28 Tessman Seed Co. St. Paul Fertilizer 444.56 The Greater Dog Refund of SUP fees 225.00 Tri-State Bobcat Equipment repair supplies & rental 680.87 Verizon Wireless Wireless Service 2,324.58 Walmart Community Supplies 589.92 Wellner Wade Reimburse for Work Boots 160.00 Wolf Beth Reimburse for B&C picnic supplies 14.96 Xcel Energy Energy 33,264.58 Zee Medical Service First aid supplies 188.55 CREDIT CARDS Amazon.com Supplies 2,111.76 AMEM Annual Conference 225.00 ARC Document Solutions LLC Paper 107.96 Backgroundchecks.com Back ground checks 448.85 Breezy Point Resort Lodging for conference 615.00 Page 3 Dey Distributing Dishwasher repair parts 43.49 Dive Rescue International Inc Dive floats 90.99 Doty Belt Medical lifting belt 74.62 Dropbox Subscription for sharing lg files with contractors 450.00 Grand Pizza & Catering Training lunch 89.01 Landscape Restoration Inc Site cleaning in Bridgewater Park- materials 84.00 Lowes Home Centers Inc.Supplies 699.80 Pizza Man of Stillwater Pizzas for officers working case in Stillwater 60.00 Radisson Hotel Duluth Lodging for conference 293.80 Secure by Design Inc Ninite subscription 240.00 Washington County Parks Vehicle Park Pass 215.32 Wolf Marine Inc.Fuel 178.86 Zero Abuse Project Training - Vetsch 130.97 REC CENTER AT&T Mobility Cell phone 176.43 Becker Arena Products Equipment repair supplies 675.62 Brady Doug Reimburse for mileage 68.73 Cintas Corporation Mat cleaning service 103.00 Coca-Cola Distribution Beverages for concessions 525.36 Comcast TV Internet & Voice 373.65 HDR Architecture Dome Project 6,887.72 Holiday Credit Office Fuel 15.68 Jaytech Inc Cooling water treatment 718.88 Menards Equipment repair supplies 137.37 Riedell Shoes Inc.Skates 121.55 Sentry Systems Inc.Alarm monitoring 140.85 LIBRARY Advantage Computer Systems Hearing Loops Storytime Room 6,600.00 Annie Mack Music Programs 850.00 Brodart Co Materials 1,987.06 Creason Kaylin Staff Reimbursement 187.43 Hedin Sue Programs 91.06 Midwest Tape Materials 70.28 Office of MN IT Services Phone 143.70 Otis Elevator Company Elevator SVC Contract 579.42 Premier Lighting Inc LED Conversion 6,672.24 SHI International Corp Library IT Project 3,128.00 Thorager Natasha Programs 335.00 Washington County Library Materials 570.68 Page 4 LIBRARY CREDIT CARDS Amazon.com Supplies 180.92 Candyland Programs 30.00 Country Messenger Materials - Periodicals 26.00 Dream Host Web Hosting 15.99 Horizon Datasys Corp Library IT Project - Reboot Restore 1,010.10 River Market Co-Op Programs 30.00 TechSoup Adobe Acrobat Pro & Photo Shop 209.00 VistaPrint.com Supplies 71.95 ADDENDUM BlueCross BlueShield Retiree Insurance 3,164.00 Comcast Internet & Voice 279.60 TOTAL 283,574.37 Adopted by the City Council this 3rd day of September, 2019 200 Chestnut St E, #204 Stillwater, MN 55082 651‐439‐4001 www.GreaterStillwaterChamber.com Bridging Business & Community September 1, 2019 Stillwater City Council City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater MN 55082 Dear Council Members: The Chamber met with Mayor Kozlowski, Chief Gannaway, Mr. McCarty, and Cory Buettner, (representing Harvest Fest) last week regarding the increased cost of public safety for the Rivertown Fall Art Festival and Harvest Fest. Both events are family friendly bringing thousands of people to the City of Stillwater every fall. The art festival has been around for over 30 years and has become a legacy event for the community and Harvest Fest brings families and excitement to the valley. With the opportunity to allow visitors to enjoy spirits in the event venue space, the public safety costs have increased significantly. These additional fees have made a negative impact on the success of these community events. While we discussed the importance of public safety at this meeting and agreed this was not an area that could be modified, we did agree on the value of these events to the City of Stillwater, the economic impact to the businesses, and experience to its residents. We are proposing the City act as a sponsor for these historic events and consider a few options to do so. We discussed a fixed cost to operate legacy events that would not impact the labor costs to the City. For example, waive the $1,500 cost of the park fees would act as an in‐kind sponsorship to the events. Both events would consider this a sponsorship and the City of Stillwater would be recognized as such. This would demonstrate collaboration and partnership and would send a positive message to the community. We host these events to bring people to our beautiful river town and would like to find a way to do this in partnership with you. Thank you for your consideration. Robin Anthony, IOM Executive Director Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce cc: Mr. Tom McCarty, City Administrator Chief Gannaway, Stillwater Police Department Mayor Kozlowski, City of Stillwater Cory Buettner, Harvest Fest Beth Wolf, City Clerk 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651‐430‐8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 3, 2019 SPECIAL MEETING 3:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Curling Club Facility Discussion 2. Budget Workshop IV. RECESS RECESSED MEETING 7:00 P.M. V. CALL TO ORDER VI. ROLL CALL VII. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE VIII. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS 3. Proclamation: Oak‐Land Middle School Educator and Stillwater Area High School Girls & Boys Swim and Dive Coach Brian Luke IX. OPEN FORUM ‐ the open forum is a portion of the council meeting to address council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. the council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. X. STAFF REPORTS 4. Police Chief 5. Fire Chief 6. City Clerk 7. Community Development Dir. 8. Public Works Dir. 9. Finance Director 10. City Attorney 11. City Administrator XI. CONSENT AGENDA ‐ all items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a council member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 12. August 20, 2019 Special, Regular and Closed Session meeting minutes 13. Payment of Bills 14. Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2019‐26 to consider a Zoning Text Amendment for the creation of a Rural Residential Zoning District – Ordinance 2nd Reading 15. Denial Resolution on CPC Case No. 2019‐36 PUD Amendment, Special Use Permit, Vacation Easement, and Preliminary Plat for New England Place PID # 3003020320099 – Resolution 16. Denial Resolution on CPC Case No. 2019‐37 Variance request to the maximum allowed building coverage and a Variance to lot size for second lot – Resolution 17. HKGi Parking Capacity Study – Resolution 18. Microsoft Licensing Renewal XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS ‐ out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 10 minutes or less. 19. CPC Case No. 2019‐43 to consider a request to amend City Code Section 41‐7, Seasonal Outdoor Sales. Notice was published in the Stillwater Gazette on Friday, August 23, 2019 – Ordinance 1st Reading 20. HPC Case No. 2019‐03 to consider a request by Reid and Julie Miller, property owners, for the consideration of the residence as a locally‐designated heritage preservation site. Property located at 615 Broadway St S in the Neighborhood Conservation District. PID 2803020440059. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on Friday, July 12, 2019 – Resolution XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 21. Oak Park Heights Annexation Detachment Memorandum of Understanding – Resolution XIV. NEW BUSINESS 22. Structure at 7940 Neal Ave N – Resolution 23. Harvest Festival Event Contract and Temporary Liquor License 24. Designation Study on Accessory Structure at 116 Harriet St S 25. Declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for hearing on the 2019 Street Improvment Project – 2 Resolutions 26. Declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of assessment roll and calling for hearing on the 2019 Sidewalk Improvement Project – 2 Resolutions 27. Adopting the proposed tax levy for the payable year 2020 – Resolution 28. Adopting the proposed budget for the year 2020 – Resolution 29. Setting the Truth and Taxation meeting date – Resolution XV. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS XVI. ADJOURNMENT TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director DATE: August 28, 2019 RE: Curling Center discussion INTRODUCTION Curlers from the St Croix Valley area are searching for a location to construct a curling center. Their search for a site has led them to Stillwater’s recreation center property. If their concept is supported by the City Council, then the curling group would like to construct a state of the art eight sheet facility. The facility would include food and beverage service that would be available to the patrons of the recreation center, and meeting rooms that could also be used by the public. In return, for the public benefits, the curling group hopes the City Council would lease the land the building would sit on for $1 a year. REQUEST The curling group requests the Council to approve the concept of leasing land to them for $1 year. They are also requesting comments on the various concept plan elements. COMMENTS The primary challenge on the site would be parking. Currently there is a lack of parking for many of the hockey events. The curling club facility would increase the parking shortage, unless additional parking is constructed. So, regardless which concept site plan the Council may support, expanded on-site parking will be crucial. There are two basic site layout options. Option A would be to locate the curling facility south of the dome. Option B would be to attach it to the ice arena. The layouts for both options are attached. Option A is preferred by the curling club. Option B is preferred by the recreation center management. Curling Center August 28, 2019 Page 2 The City Engineer’s Office has studied the potential for a new parking lot similar to the one shown in Option B. The estimated cost of the parking lot improvements is about $750,000. This is about $3,340 per parking space. Staff anticipates that there would be some arrangement made for sharing of the costs of constructing this new lot, or the two lots in Option A. COUNCIL ACTION At the work session, the Council is asked to discuss the concepts presented by the curling club group. Staff requests Council to: 1. Discuss whether there is Council support for leasing recreation center property to the group for $1 a year. If the Council supports leasing for $1, is there a preference for Option A or B? 2. Comment on other elements of the concept plan, including destination of re- located skateboard park, retaining an outside ice rink, sharing of costs for new parking, etc. Attachments: Site layout Option A & B Letter from curling group bt -Created stand alone curling facility south of dome. -Skateboard park is relocated on-site. -Outdoor ice rink remains but is reduced in size. -New south lot has about 150 spaces. -New northwest lot has about 80 spaces. -Tota l new spaces is about 230. -Curling tournaments (bonspiels) wou ld generate need for about 140 spaces. , -General public gains 90 spaces during bonspiels. -Curling club prefers this option. Potential curling center layout Dome expansion area Relocated skateboard park 35 spaces 31 spaces 25 spaces 25 spaces 31 spaces 25 spaces 25 spaces 28 spaces Outdoor Rink Option B - Attach curling facility to ice arena. - Skateboard park is relocated on-site. - Outdoor rink remains but is reduced in size. - New south lot with about 225 spaces. - Bonspiels require about 140 parking spaces. - General public gains 85 spaces during bonspiels. - Food & beverage service conveniently located for ice arena. A A A A A A A A A A A 194'-8"99'-8"35'-0"60'-0"226'-0" 39'-0"39'-0"39'-0"39'-0"36'-0"34'-0" 156'-0"134'-8"VENDINGK-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINAK-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA MEN RR WOMEN RR MEN LOCKER 17' X 33' 110 LOCKERS (12X12) WOMEN LOCKER 15' X 33' 110 LOCKERS (12X12) ELEV JAN. OFFICE 12' X 20' TRASH 14' X 9' DELIVERY / STORAGE SPRINKLER 14' X 9' ELECTRICAL 14' X 9' MECHANICAL / STORAGE 52' X 26' H2O / MECH 14' X 9' VESTIBULE 21' X 9' VIEWING AREA 34' X 134' 4'-0"4'-0" 6'-2"145'-0"4'-0"4'-0"2'-4"29'-4"3'-0"29'-4"2'-4"29'-4"4'-0"13'-2" GUEST LOCKER 15' X 33' 115 LOCKERS (12X12) EXISTING HOCKEY BUILDING 29'-4"K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA ICE EQUIPMENT 24' X 42' OFFICE 12' X 17' CURLING AREA 21,097 SF STUDIO NOR C U S T O M D E S I G N PROJECT: ST CROIX CURLING CENTER PROPOSED AT STILLWATER REC. CENTER CLIENT: ST CROIX CURLING CENTER PHONE:651-600-2547 SCROIXCURLINGCENTER@GMAIL.COM ST. MARY'S POINT ICE ARENA 2489 ITASCA AVE S. LAKELAND, MN 55043, USA LOCATION: 1675 MARKET DR. STILLWATER, MN 55082 SHEET: STUDIO NOR DESIGN LLC. STUDIONOR.DESIGN @STUDIONOR.DESIGN PH: 651-271-1319 MATT@STUDIONOR.DESIGN COPYRIGHT: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS BUILDING ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF STUDIO NOR DESIGN LLC. AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESES PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DISCLAIMER: THE FOLLOWING PLANS AND DOCUMENTS CREATED WERE PREPARED UPON REQUEST BY A DRAFTSMAN WHO IS NOT A REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. STUDIO NOR DESIGN, LLC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRUCTURAL & DIMENSIONAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. THE CONTRACTOR / BUILDER / OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CHECK ALL NOTES, DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, AND FLOOR PLANS AND NOTIFY STUDIO NOR DESIGN, LLC. OF ANY ERRORS FOR POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO WARRENTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE SELECTION OF ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND OR CONTRACTOR WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN THAT JURISDICTION. A100 MAIN LEVEL A A A A A A A A A A A 194'-8"99'-8"35'-0"60'-0"226'-0" 39'-0"39'-0"39'-0"39'-0"36'-0"34'-0" 156'-0"134'-8"ELEV 4'-0" K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA K-3544HIGHLINEC_TOILETSVITREOUS CHINA BAR / ORDER 16' X 24' BEER COOLER 14' X 14' FOOD COOLER 14' X 14' FREEZER 14' X 14' DRY STOR 14' X 8'DISHWASHING 33' X 13' KITCHEN 53' X 46' MEETING ROOM 29' X 18' MEETING ROOM 38' X 18' MEETING ROOM 38' X 18' MEETING ROOM 38' X 18'CHAIR AND TABLE STORAGE 19' X 23' EXISTING HOCKEY BUILDING STUDIO NOR C U S T O M D E S I G N PROJECT: ST CROIX CURLING CENTER PROPOSED AT STILLWATER REC. CENTER CLIENT: ST CROIX CURLING CENTER PHONE:651-600-2547 SCROIXCURLINGCENTER@GMAIL.COM ST. MARY'S POINT ICE ARENA 2489 ITASCA AVE S. LAKELAND, MN 55043, USA LOCATION: 1675 MARKET DR. STILLWATER, MN 55082 SHEET: STUDIO NOR DESIGN LLC. STUDIONOR.DESIGN @STUDIONOR.DESIGN PH: 651-271-1319 MATT@STUDIONOR.DESIGN COPYRIGHT: THESE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS BUILDING ARE THE EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY OF STUDIO NOR DESIGN LLC. AND ARE PROTECTED BY UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT LAW. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESES PLANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DISCLAIMER: THE FOLLOWING PLANS AND DOCUMENTS CREATED WERE PREPARED UPON REQUEST BY A DRAFTSMAN WHO IS NOT A REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. STUDIO NOR DESIGN, LLC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRUCTURAL & DIMENSIONAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. THE CONTRACTOR / BUILDER / OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CHECK ALL NOTES, DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, SECTIONS, AND FLOOR PLANS AND NOTIFY STUDIO NOR DESIGN, LLC. OF ANY ERRORS FOR POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO WARRENTIES ARE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE SELECTION OF ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND OR CONTRACTOR WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN THAT JURISDICTION. A101 UPPER LEVEL ABOUT CURLING There is much more to curling than meets the eye, that is, throwing and sweeping rocks down the ice. The part that is not visible is the strong social activity that occurs after the game. By tradition players meet with their opponents in the players' area to discuss the game and socialize while having food and drink. In one season players could meet with sixty opponents. This is a great way to make new friends from one's community and others, and people from all walks of life. The need for activities where adults can interact has increased. Recent headlines read that 35% of Americans over 40 years of age are chronically lonely while 30% of households are single- parent, and suicides are up 30%, a proxy for loneliness. Often people today are leading lonely lives. The social aspect of curling fosters strong interpersonal connections that help address these issues. Who can curl? People of virtually any age and ability from 6 to 90! Junior programs begin at age 6 and the venues are packed with parents and family watching. Kids don't need to be the fastest, strongest or tallest to be successful. There is no physical interaction to cause injury or anger. Junior competitions include any teams that wish to participate and are played in their own facility or others in the region or in other cities. Good sportsmanship is taught at this stage according to tradition of respect for their opponents all through the match and after. Most World and Olympic athletes began in their local facilities as Junior curlers. And those older adults who can no longer crouch down can still play by using a special stick to deliver the rock. The facility will be open to the public . What does it cost? This activity is very affordable (about $300 per person/season). As a result people of all walks of life participate. Since one can play at any age or ability, people tend to do so all their lives, frequently as couples or family generations. This is truly a life-changing sport for all who play, especially for those who become empty-nesters, single again, widowed or simply lonely. How many people curl? Based on the 8-sheets in the St. Paul facility there will be 1450-1500 per week not counting spectators. On average this breaks down to 200 each evening, 50 during the day and 280 each weekend. The game and social time usually take about 3 hours or so. How is a strong, socially active community created? With a curling venue it takes thoughtful planning from an experienced group to implement the traditions and organize a well-run operation. The numerous events and tournaments require member volunteers to execute the scheduling, planning, hosting and planning to make an excellent product. This volunteerism tends to solidify personal relationships and a sense of belonging within this unique sport. Our Board is adamant the social aspects be well planned. Who are we? What have we done? All our board members and others have over 30 years of curling experience. We have curled in most MN and WI facilities and in cities worldwide. We have members and consultants knowledgeable in curling facilities and design, building and fund raising. Last fall we obtained agreement for ice time at the St. Mary's Point Hockey Arena Sunday afternoons, and the equipment, members and financing to accommodate 140 members. We have the same agreement for this fall and winter. The activity of curling is growing worldwide as reported by the USA Curling Association. Our board and members feel a dedicated facility serving the East Metro and western Wisconsin areas is very appropriate and needed since all others in the Metro are at peak capacity. Due to the good economy and this affluent area, we think the necessary funds can be raised for a dedicated facility. We believe that there is no better opportunity to reach a large, broad community group in respect to age, physical ability and financial capability than this social/physical curling activity. St . Croix Curling Center Board Al Taylor, President 2020 Proposed Budget - UpdatedCITY OF STILLWATERSeptember 3, 2019 2020 Proposed BudgetUpdated Information/Discussion ItemsProperty TaxpayersWho are they?All Funds BudgetTax ImpactDebt Service LevyIncrease of $13,450Based on Final Official StatementOther Discussion Items Budget FactorsProposed 2020$99,000 Increase/Decrease in Operating Expenditures1% of Levy1% Increase/Decrease in Health Insurance Premium$9,200Retiree Health Insurance8% of the LevyLibrary Operating Levy13% of the levyPersonnel Costs77% of the LevyCosts to continue4.21% Property TaxpayersWho pays the property taxes?76%23%1%Residential Tax PayersCommercial/IndustrialTaxpayersOther TaxpayersTax Capacity Generated by… All Funds Budget2020 ProposedFund/Fund Type Operating BudgetCapitalOutlayBudgetBudget TotalGeneral Fund $12,386,299 $3,356,850 $15,743,149Special Revenue Funds $4,683,249 $762,600 $5,445,849Debt Service Funds $4,867,114 $0 $4,867,114Permanent Improvement Fund $0 $6,475,000 $6,475,000TIF Funds $129,500 $800,000 $929,500Enterprise Funds $5,778,219 $687,000 $6,465,219Total $27,844,381 $12,081,450 $39,925,831General FundMayor & Council PoliceElections FireMIS InspectionsFinance Civil DefenseHuman Resources EngineeringAdministration StreetsLegal UnallocatedCommunity DevelopmentSpecial Revenue FundsEnterprise FundsSpecial Events Sanitary SewerSt Croix Valley Rec Center Storm SewerLibrary Signs & LightingLibrary Donations ParkingParks Parking RampParksCommunity BeautificationWaCo RecyclingLodging Tax Tax Impact Updated InformationFrom August 20thMeetingDebt Service LevyIncrease = $13,450Total Tax CapacityIncrease: +8.3% vs +7%Proposed Property Tax RateDecrease: 52.588% vs 53.777% Property Tax LevyOriginal vs Updated2019Adopted CITY‐WIDE LEVY2020 Proposed$ Increase/ Decrease% increase/ Decrease$9,914,425General Operating Tax Levy$10,547,146 $632,721 6.382%$3,773,801Debt Service Tax Levy$4,008,676 $234,875 6.224%$13,688,226Totals$14,555,822 $867,596 6.338%2019Adopted CITY‐WIDE LEVY2020 Proposed$ Increase/ Decrease% increase/ Decrease$9,914,425General Operating Tax Levy$10,547,146$632,721 6.382%$3,773,801Debt Service Tax Levy $4,022,126 $248,325 6.580%$13,688,226Totals $14,569,272 $881,046 6.437%Original (August 20th)…Updated Proposal (September 3RD)… Property Tax RateProposed 2020Note: Valuation numbers and fiscal disparity numbers are estimates with the following assumptions made:Assumptions8.3% increasein the City’s Taxable Tax Capacity.9.5% increase in the Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy.Formula: Total City Property Tax Levy City’s Taxable Tax Capacity = City Tax RateItemActual Pay 2019Proposed Pay 2020% ChangeProperty Tax Levy $13,688,226 $14,569,272 6.437%Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy‐$1,354,022 $1,482,654 9.500%City’s Portion of Levy=$12,334,204 $13,086,618 6.100%City’s Taxable Tax Capacity÷22,983,822 $24,885,334 8.273%City Tax Rate=53.665% 52.588%‐2.007% Property Tax RateLast Ten Years and Proposed (Estimated) 2020*0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020*Year Rate201049.432%201152.539%201254.674%201361.503%201458.216%201554.916%201656.996%201756.927%201853.421%201953.665%2020*52.588% Tax Impact-Residential2020 Updated ProposedActual Payable 2019 Proposed Payable 2020 From 2019 to 2020Market ValueTax CapacityActual City Tax RateCity Property TaxTaxable Market ValueTax CapacityProposed City Tax RateCity Property Tax $ Change % Change272,100 2,593 53.664% $1,391.53 289,800 2,786 52.588% $1,465.09 $73.57 5.3%93,900 651 53.664% $349.36 100,000 718 52.588% $377.58 $28.22 8.1%140,800 1,162 53.664% $623.58 150,000 1,263 52.588% $664.18 $40.60 6.5%234,700 2,186 53.664% $1,173.11 250,000 2,353 52.588% $1,237.39 $64.28 5.5%375,600 3,722 53.664% $1,997.40 400,000 3,988 52.588% $2,097.20 $99.80 5.0%Assumptions6.5% increase in Market Value from 2019 to 2020Information is based on Residential Homestead PropertiesMarket Values are converted to Tax Capacity Values using Class Rates determined by the MN Legislature. Discussion Items Discussion ItemsPossible impacts to 2020 BudgetConsulting FeesPD Organizational Review TimingNew/Modified PositionsPriorities and funding optionsEnterprise Fund – Sanitary SewerRate Study Analysis / Establish Future RatesHistorical Society – Capital Campaign RequestOther Potential Revenue & Expenditure Adjustments CONSULTING FEES2020 Operating BudgetDepartment Purpose Requested Proposed DiscussionMayor/Council Lobbyist $25,000 $25,000 High PriorityMayor/Council Strat Plan Facilitator/Brand $10,000 $10,000 High PriorityMayor/Council Economic Development $10,000 $10,000 High PriorityAdministration PD Organizational Review $40,000$30,000 Priority – initiate in 2019Community Development Comp Plan Ordinance Amendments $25,000 $15,000 $10,000 funded in 2019Community Development Rec Center Master Plan $25,000 $25,000 Priority – fund through Rec Center Operations (non‐levy)Community Development HPC Matching Funds $5,000 $5,000 PriorityEngineering Prairie Park Plan $20,000 $10,000 Priority –revisedcost estimateMIS Enterprise‐wide software analysis $15,000 $0 Conduct internal analysis of existing financial software capacity during 2020TOTALS $175,000$130,000* $105,000 Levy Impact*Proposed Amount – 1.0% Increase in Operating Levy New/Modified PositionsRequested/Proposed Department Position Priority FTE Requested Proposed NotesMIS GIS/IT Technician High 1.0 $76,879$34,601 Push Start Date to 07/01/20Finance Accountant Critical 1.0 $83,646 $59,929 Reduce to .75 FTE Position Inspections Admin Assistant/Scanner Critical 1.0 $28,741 $14,371 Reduce to .5 LTE PositionPolice Police Officer High 1.0 $104,511$104,511 Revise Start Date ‐?Police Police Officer High 1.0 $104,511 $0Police Police Officer High 1.0 $104,511 $0Police Police Officer High 1.0 $104,511 $0Fire Data Specialist High 0.25 $17,912 $0 Increase to 1.0 FTEFire Firefighter Critical 1.0 $87,604 $0Parks Maintenance Worker II High 1.0 $54,726 $0 To Start 04/01/20Parks Park & Rec Manager Critical 1.0 $80,032$80,032 Add 04/01/20 ‐?Storm Sewer Environmental Tech Critical 1.0 $60,213 $60,213 To Start 04/01/20TOTALS 11.25 $907,797$353,657LEVY IMPACT $847,584$293,444 Sanitary Sewer Rate AnalysisConsultant Baker-Tilly Analysis & RecommendationsGoal – Provide recommendations for rates that will provide sufficient revenues to fund operations and capital maintenance of sanitary sewer system.Sanitary sewer fund currently operates with a net loss position.Two alternatives:Option 1 – increase rates by 15% for two years, then increase rates by 3% annually; debt issuance annually for capital projects.Option 2 – increase rates by 18% for two years, then increase rates by 3% annually; issue debt for capital projects in 2020, cash-finance future needs. *RECOMMENDEDNOTE: Met Council annual sewer rate increases must be added to above. Washington County Historical Society Capital Campaign Contribution Request$250,000 over 5 years requested from City of StillwaterOptions:Contribute “x” annually over 5 years from property tax levy (add to current $5000/yr. operations support funding). Provide one time contribution of “x” in 2020.Deny funding request. Discussion Items – Potential 2020 Levy ImpactsConsultant Fees – added cost for PD Operational Review.Position Requests – added cost for Parks & Recreation Supervisor position effective 4/1/2020.Historical Society Contribution – added cost. Total = $100,032 additional levy increase or 1% increase to current proposed 2020 budget and levy.Potential Adjustments to Revenues & Expenditures between September and December Truth in Taxation meeting could impact proposed property tax levy. Proposed Additions2020 Operating BudgetDescription AmountPD Organizational Review $10,000Park & Rec Manager $80,032Historical Society – Capital Campaign $10,000Total $100,032 Property Tax Levy2019Adopted CITY‐WIDE LEVY2020 Proposed$ Increase/ Decrease% increase/ Decrease$9,914,425General Operating Tax Levy$10,547,146$632,721 6.382%$3,773,801Debt Service Tax Levy $4,022,126 $248,325 6.580%$13,688,226Totals $14,569,272 $881,046 6.437%2019Adopted CITY‐WIDE LEVY2020 Proposed$ Increase/ Decrease% increase/ Decrease$9,914,425General Operating Tax Levy$10,647,178$732,753 7.391%$3,773,801Debt Service Tax Levy $4,022,126 $248,325 6.580%$13,688,226Totals $14,669,304 $981,075 7.167%Proposal 1 (September 3RD)…Proposal 2 (September 3RD)… Tax Impact-Residential2020 Proposal 2Actual Payable 2019 Proposed Payable 2020 From 2019 to 2020Market ValueTax CapacityActual CityTax RateCity Property TaxTaxable Market ValueTax CapacityProposed City Tax RateCity Property Tax $ Change % Change272,100 2,593 53.664% $1,391.53 289,800 2,786 52.990% $1,476.29 $84.77 6.1%93,900 651 53.664% $349.36 100,000 718 52.990% $380.47 $31.11 8.9%140,800 1,162 53.664% $623.58 150,000 1,263 52.990% $669.26 $45.68 7.3%234,700 2,186 53.664% $1,173.11 250,000 2,353 52.990% $1,246.85 $73.74 6.3%375,600 3,722 53.664% $1,997.40 400,000 3,988 52.990% $2,113.23 $115.83 5.8%Item Actual Pay 2019 Proposed Pay 2020 % ChangeProperty Tax Levy $13,688,226 $14,669,304 7.167%Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy‐$1,354,022 $1,482,654 9.500%City’s Portion of Levy=$12,334,204 $13,186,650 6.911%City’s Taxable Tax Capacity÷22,983,822 $24,885,334 8.273%City Tax Rate = 53.665% 52.990%‐1.258% City o~ ~ tiQQwate/l, uU iiu,egota cp /locQamatlon Brian Luke Day WHEREAS, Brian Luke is being inducted into the Minnesota State High School Coaches Association Hall of Fame on October 12, 2019. He is being recognized for his more than four decades of positive impact on athletes and the tremendous achievements by the girls' and boys' swimming and diving teams; and WHEREAS, Luke will become the third Stillwater head coach to enter the hall of fame; his father, Elmer Luke, was inducted into the MSHSCA Hall of Fame in 2005; and WHEREAS, Luke was previously inducted into the Minnesota State Swimming and Diving Coaches Association Hall of Fame in 2012; and WHEREAS, this will mark Brian's 45th year leading the girls' and boys' programs at Stillwater. • The Stillwater girls carry 158 consecutive dual meet victories dating back to 2003 and 135 straight against conference opponents dating back to 2002, breaking his father's record. The boys have 46 consecutive dual meet victories. • In 44 seasons, Brian has compiled a 374-53-4 dual meet record with 26 conference girls' championships. When you add the 319-88-3 record leading the boys, his everall mark is an impressive 693-141-7 with a total of 48 conference titles (26 girls, 22 boys), 35 MSHSL section championships (19 girls, 16 boys), 4 MSHSL state titles (girls) and 7 True Team state championships (girls). • Brian's athletes have also racked up 26 individual state titles (18 girls, 8 boys) and 8 state relay championships (7 girls, 1 boys). The girls won MSHSL state championships in 2005, 2006, 2008 and 2009 and have placed among the top 5 at state 11 of the past 15 years, including top-3 finishes 7 times. WHEREAS, Luke will also be honored with an Alumni Achievement Award by Southwest Minnesota State University presented to a graduate in recognition of their remarkable professional success and the positive reflection made on the reputation of all graduates of SMSU. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, I, Michael Polehna, Vice Mayor of the City of Stillwater, do hereby proclaim September 4, 2019 as -Brian Luke Day- in the City of Stillwater and encourage the citizens of Stillwater to congratulate Brian on his accomplishments. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Stillwater to be affixed this 3rd day of September, 2019. 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651‐430‐8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES August 20, 2019 REGULAR MEETING 3:00 P.M. Mayor Kozlowski called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. Present: Mayor Kozlowski, Councilmembers Collins, Junker, Weidner and Polehna Absent: None Staff present: City Administrator McCarty City Attorney Land Community Development Director Turnblad Police Chief Gannaway Fire Chief Glaser Deputy Fire Chief Ballis Public Works Director Sanders Finance Director Provos Human Resources Director Robole Library Director Troendle MIS Manager Holman City Clerk Wolf OTHER BUSINESS Lambert Pre‐Annexation Agreement Community Development Director Turnblad informed the Council that Central Commons, LLC has purchased approximately 32 acres in Stillwater Township south of State Highway 36 and east of Manning Avenue. The owner plans to petition the City to annex the property and develop the site as a mixed use Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD would include residential use, an apartment complex, as yet undetermined office or commercial, a grocer (HyVee is interested), and closer to Highway 36, retail pads and a retail store/gas station. Stillwater Township and the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan both support the annexation of the property into the City. Prior to annexation, the owner of the property would like to enter into a pre‐annexation agreement. If the City Council finds the pre‐ annexation agreement to be generally acceptable, then it would be placed on the September 3 Council agenda for possible approval. Mr. Turnblad explained two aspects of the proposed pre‐annexation agreement: 1) zoning and 2) potential tax abatement. The Highway 36 corridor is currently zoned as highway mixed use which is inappropriate for the proposed PUD. Staff is considering establishing a new zoning district based on the City’s business park commercial zoning district with a modification to state that if developed by PUD, a project may include residential as part of the mix. Five story buildings would be allowed; setbacks would be lowered; and allowable impervious surface could increase slightly because stormwater treatment areas could be consolidated. The developer is asking the Council to consider tax abatement to cover the City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 2 of 10 extra costs associated with extending services. More details will be brought to the next meeting. Councilmembers Collins and Junker noted that five story buildings may have too great an impact in the corridor. Councilmember Junker noted the tallest building along Highway 36 is the Washington County Courthouse. Mr. Turnblad replied that the five story building will be offset, lessening the visual impact. Councilmember Weidner remarked it looks like it will be staggered with buildings in front of it so realistically it will look like just one additional story. Mayor Kozlowski stated he has no problem with five stories in that area. Councilmember Junker stated he would like to see different scenarios for possible tax abatement and the financial impacts on the City. Mr. Turnblad replied that City Administrator McCarty has already begun studying that with the financial consultants and more detail will be provided soon. Budget Workshop City Administrator McCarty provided a presentation on the preliminary 2020 budget. He reviewed budget factors contributing to an overall proposed levy increase of 6.4%. Finance Director Provos reviewed the debt service and general operating levy numbers. She explained how the property tax rate is calculated. Mr. McCarty summarized all the departmental requests, including new staffing positions, their levy impacts, and which positions are being recommended by himself and Finance Director Provos. MIS Manager Holman offered justification for a GIS position to assist various departments with organization of data, files, mapping, and to support systems involving badges, cameras and other equipment. Police Chief Gannaway informed the Council this will be his last budget session. He stated that 42% of shifts last year were covered by only two officers; the department really needs three officers to cover a shift, especially at night. He recommends hiring two FTE starting in January. Fire Chief Glaser explained that he would like to establish a paid on call duty crew who will be required to spend 12 hours per week in the station. Currently, there are two people on duty at the station only 35% of the time which is inadequate. Mr. McCarty referred to the request by the building inspection department for a .5 FTE administrative assistant intern position. Mr. Turnblad stated the intern’s task would be to digitize a roomful of City records. Mr. McCarty went on to discuss emergency management, engineering, library, parks and street department requests. Public Works Director Sanders explained the parks and recreation manager and the environmental technician positions requested. City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 3 of 10 Mr. McCarty discussed the Community Beautification Fund, the County Recycling Grant, Lodging Tax, proposed Capital Outlay budget, and proposed street projects. Further budget discussion will take place at the next meeting. RECESS Mayor Kozlowski recessed the meeting at 6:04 p.m. RECESSED MEETING 7:00 P.M. Mayor Kozlowski called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Kozlowski led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. Present: Mayor Kozlowski, Councilmembers Collins, Junker, Weidner and Polehna Absent: None Staff present: City Administrator McCarty City Attorney Land Community Development Director Turnblad Finance Director Provos Police Chief Gannaway Fire Chief Glaser Public Works Director Sanders Library Director Troendle City Clerk Wolf PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS Youth Service Bureau Budget Request ‐ Robert Sherman, Executive Director Robert Sherman, Executive Director of the Youth Service Bureau, explained the work that YSB does in the areas of diversion services, mental health and chemical health programs. He requested $12,000 in City support for 2020. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. STAFF REPORTS City Clerk reminded the Councilmembers of the Boards and Commissions picnic Thursday. Community Development Director Turnblad asked for questions for the monthly Polco community survey. Public Works Director Sanders urged drivers to use caution because Lake McKusick is starting to overflow on McKusick Road. He informed the Council the ADA plan is being completed. City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 4 of 10 CONSENT AGENDA July 30, 2019 regular meeting minutes Payment of Bills Lift Bridge Bike, Run, Belch Event Resolution 2019‐086, a resolution amending Resolution 2018‐173, adopting 2019 Fee Schedule Knights of Columbus Temporary Liquor License Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS CPC Case No. 2019‐26: Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) for the creation of a Rural Residential Zoning District. Community Development Director Turnblad stated that on October 5, 2018, the City Council enacted a one‐year moratorium on all new subdivisions and lot splits in the “Minar Neighborhood”, an area including Minar Avenue North, Minar Lane North, 75th Street North, 77th Street North, and 77th Street Court North, to determine the appropriateness of increased density and to develop a corresponding Rural Residential zoning district classification. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended the minimum lot size for a new parcel in the Rural Residential district be one acre. Almost half the existing lots could physically do a lot split if the lot size were one acre. Staff recommends approval of the ZAT. Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Mayor Kozlowski closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to adopt first reading of an Ordinance creating Article 31‐301, Rural Residential District, and amending Article 31‐315, allowable uses in residential districts, of the City Code of the City of Stillwater. All in favor. CPC Case No. 2019‐36: request by Robert Hill, property owner and Todd Konigson, applicant, for a PUD Amendment, Special Use Permit, Vacation Easement, and Preliminary Plat for the property located at XXX New England Place. Community Development Director Turnblad stated that Todd Konigson of livwell.design would like to construct six residential units in two separate buildings on Outlot D, at the corner of Settlers Way and New England Place. The proposed units would have a first floor home office, each facing the respective streets, with a private garage in the rear. The residence would be located above the home office space, on the second and third stories. This necessitates the following requests: 1) a Preliminary Plat for the development of six townhome units on two parcels of land to be known as Liberty Village 5th Addition; 2) an amendment to the Concept/Preliminary PUD to allow for three stories (opposed to 2.5) while remaining under the maximum 35’ height restriction; 3) a Special Use Permit for residences in the Village Commercial district; and 4) a (partial) easement vacation request. He stated there is concern in neighborhood about the design. Staff is recommending a revision to Condition #3, regarding building design, requiring that the developer meet with City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 5 of 10 both the Liberty on the Lake Homeowners’ Association and the Liberty Village Commercial Association to discuss building design; and also requiring that before the application is considered complete, the presidents of each association must submit a letter to the City supporting the design. This is because staff understands that the private guidelines and concerns of the neighborhood are more detailed than those of the City. Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat, Concept PUD amendment, and SUP with 17 conditions. Furthermore, staff recommends tabling consideration of the easement vacation and requiring that a shared parking and driveway easement agreement shall be developed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the submittal of the Final PUD and plat. Councilmember Weidner asked if the associations, or only their presidents, must approve the building design. Mr. Turnblad replied the intention is that the associations approve the building design. He reiterated that in addition to the revised Condition #3, staff would like to table action on the easement for the parking and bring it back with the final plat application. Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing. Todd Remely, president of Liberty on the Lake Homeowners’ Association, stated that while the association members would like to see the land developed and support the concept of rowhouses, they are concerned that the aesthetic and design of the development do not fit the architectural standards of the neighborhood, which was carefully developed with a central New England design theme. He urged the Council to not allow a single developer to enter late in the game and take away what so many people create d. He asked that the Council table action until an appropriate design is submitted, and to facilitate the scheduling of a 30 minute meeting with each Councilmember over the next week to discuss the concerns. Dr. Ginger Garley, owner of Rivertown Animal Hospital, 135 New England Place, stated she opposes the development. She agreed with Mr. Remely’s comments but is also opposed to condos and would prefer to have it remain as a business site. She feels the scale, style and proportions of the proposed buildings do not fit the New England theme. She is extremely concerned about parking challenges. She has heard it stated that the business association supported this but they have not had a meeting about it or discussed it as an association. Darren Senn stated the original Liberty developers were very intent about creating something special that would stand the test of time. He commended the developer for bringing this creative housing type to the neighborhood, but questioned the design aesthetic. He would like to meet with each Councilmember about the design and how it does not fit with Liberty on the Lake. Isabella (no late name given), Ralph Bell’s sister, stated she would like to see more cameras put up around the Stillwater area because her brother went missing and cameras may have helped. Mayor Kozlowski clarified that the public hearing is for a neighborhood development. He encouraged her to come back and speak during the open forum portion of a meeting. Todd Konigson, developer, stated he hopes the associations have had the chance to review colored renderings. He oriented the buildings toward the square per Council direction. He changed to a gabled roof design which is like every other house in Liberty. He had included a standing seam metal roof but if the community would prefer shingles he does not have a City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 6 of 10 problem using shingles. He will do anything to make the project succeed. He intends to use the same roof pitch design, lap siding and color scheme which every house in the development has. The buildings would be 35’, the same as Patriot’s Tavern which is not out of scale. Regarding parking, the original PUD called for a commercial building. He is proposing a dedicated public parking area that he would not use so he is actually providing more improved parking for the local businesses. He stated that Michael Oreck, president of the commercial association, has been involved and has had all the information for several months now. Mr. Konigson understands they were supportive. He also understands that the proposal did not have to go to homeowners’ association because it is going into the commercial area. Instead of denial, he asked that the Council approve the project with contingencies. He would prefer not to have a whole neighborhood meeting. Mayor Kozlowski asked for clarification on neighborhood design regulations versus the City’s design guidelines. Mr. Turnblad replied that the concept PUD involves a fairly abbreviated design guideline that is the guiding document. Technically, the residential design guidelines do not apply to the commercial zone. Brent Pilrain, co‐owner of Patriot’s Tavern, stated commercial association meetings are scarce and this proposal has not been discussed. He knew it was being developed. He is excited to see this developed as a commercial property to complement the business district. His concerns are with basic look, style, size and footprint that do not seem to fit anything else that’s in the neighborhood. John Abbott, Liberty on the Lake resident and a registered architect in Minnesota, agreed with Mr. Remely’s and Mr. Senn’s comments. His main concern is height and design. The images and renderings do not look at all like anything else in Liberty Square. Mayor Kozlowski closed the public hearing. Mayor Kozlowski stated the requirements about association approval are confusing. He would like to make sure the developer knows what is required. Councilmember Junker stated he would love to see the lot developed but the developer should stick to a 2.5 story design. Councilmember Weidner remarked that the 2.5 story restriction has a purpose. He appreciates the new design better than the flat roof but feels three stories is out of character. He does not support the vacation of the parking easement. Councilmember Polehna stated he agrees with the 2.5 story restriction that other buildings were held to. Mayor Kozlowski stated he struggles to identify where the actual regulations are that tell the developer what size windows, what color siding, what color scheme and what design elements are acceptable for Liberty Village. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, to deny the PUD Amendment, Spe cial Use Permit, Vacation Easement, and Preliminary Plat for the property located at XXX New England Place. Mr. Konigson asked what he needs to do to make this project successful. He stated the reason for the three stories is square footage and the price point. He is willing to go to 2.5 City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 7 of 10 stories even though it will decrease the value of the units because the master bedroom will have a vaulted ceiling. He will change the windows to double hung. The building will have the same siding as Patriot’s Tavern. He again asked the Council to approve the project with contingencies. He added that he will be developing parking that has not been there for 20 years and there will be more parking for adjacent buildings than if a commercial building came in taking all the parking. Councilmember Collins asked if the Council could table action to give the applicant more time. Mr. Turnblad replied there is a time issue but the deadline can be extended to 60 days. City Attorney Land reminded the Council this is the preliminary concept plan and preliminary plat, the first step. If they want to add more conditions, they may do so. The developer may not apply for the final plat until he can comply with all the conditions. Councilmember Polehna seconded the motion for denial. City Attorney Land asked that the Councilmembers who are asking for denial please put their statements for denial in the record so staff can prepare a resolution. Councilmember Weidner noted that the proposed design does not conform to 2.5 stories. Motion passed. Ayes: Councilmembers Collins, Junker, Weidner and Polehna Nays: Mayor Kozlowski CPC Case No. 2019‐37: an appeal by Sally Studtman, property owner and Nancy Millard, applicant, for the reconsideration of a Variance request to the maximum allowed building coverage and a Variance to lot size for second lot for the prop erty located at 1422 Martha Street. Community Development Director Turnblad explained that the Edmund H. Studtman trustees would like to sell their homestead at 1422 North Martha Street. The home was built in 1888 and is situated on a parcel across Moore Street from Stillwater Country Club. The property is composed of 2 1⁄2 platted lots that were combined into a single parcel. The trustees hope to reconfigure the property into two parcels. Parcel 1 (the northern one with the existing house) meets the required 7,500 square foot minimum lot size, but it requires a building coverage variance, since there would be 27.3% coverage and only 25% is permitted. Parcel 2 needs a size variance, since it has only 6,337 square feet of area. The Planning Commission denied both variances in July on a 4‐1 vote. The applicants appealed the Planning Commission decision on the variances and are requesting the Council to approve the variances and the resubdivision. Staff finds the resubdivision and the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and with the key lot development pattern in the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends conceptual approval of the requested variances and resubdivision with six conditions. Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing. Lindsay Millard, daughter of Nancy Millard, stated the family understands that staff recommended the variances be granted because they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Her family is seeking a variance because her grandparents’ lot is bigger than many of the lots around it. She understands the Planning Commission had City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 8 of 10 concerns that the variance was solely for economic benefit. It is sought for variety of non‐ economic reasons. No one in her family wants to see her grandparents’ house torn down and a larger house built on the lot. They are trying to be thoughtful about what happens to the property. Mayor Kozlowski closed the public hearing. Councilmember Collins stated he has concern about creating a substandard lot. Mayor Kozlowski asked if there are other substandard lots in the neighborhood. He does not think the lot split would negatively impact the neighborhood. Mr. Turnblad replied yes there are other substandard lots in the neighborhood. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Collins, to uphold the Planning Commission’s denial of the variance request to the maximum allowed building coverage and a variance to lot size for second lot for the prop erty located at 1422 Martha Street. Motion passed. Ayes: Councilmembers Collins, Junker, Weidner and Polehna Nays: Mayor Kozlowski UNFINISHED BUSINESS City of Stillwater General Obligation Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 2019A Elizabeth Bergman, BakerTilly, stated the City got a very competitive rate on the bonds. She recommends approval of the sale of $3 million GO Capital outlay bonds for streetscaping, street improvements and general capital outlay. Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to adopt Resolution 2019‐088, resolution accepting proposal on the competitive negotiated sale of $3,065,000 General Obligation Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 2019A, providing for their issuance and levying a tax for payment thereof. All in favor. NEW BUSINESS Driveway Surface at 2005 Hazel Court Public Works Director Sanders stated that a requirement of a temporary Certificate of Occupancy is that the driveway be surfaced in concrete, bituminous, or pavers. The property owner is requesting the Council waive the requirement to allow for crushed rock surfacing on the new driveway. Staff recommends the Council deny the waiver request to use aggregate material for all or any portion of the driveway. However, staff would further recommend the Council authorize city staff to approve an alternative design that includes a portion of improved surfacing materials such as grass geo grid or turf block concrete pavers. Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to deny the waiver and authorize staff to approve an alternative design for a driveway surface at 2005 Hazel Court. All in favor . GreenStep Cities Workplan Community Development Director Turnblad reviewed the GreenStep Cities workplan. City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 9 of 10 Agreement between the City of Stillwater and Mahtomedi Youth Hockey Association City Administrator McCarty stated that the City of Stillwater and the City of Mahtomedi entered into a 20‐year agreement in 1999 whereby Mahtomedi agreed to contribute $700,000 toward the construction of a second sheet of ice at the Rec Center in exchange for guaranteed ice time over the next 20 hockey seasons. That agreement expires on April 1, 2020. The City and Mahtomedi Youth Hockey Association (“MYHA”) now desire to enter into a long‐term agreement whereby MYHA secures ice time at Lily Lake and at the Rec Center for its programs, and the City is able to rely on the sale of a minimum number of hours of ice time as well as receiving some revenue to assist with funding its Capital Improvement Program at the ice arenas. Doug Brady, manager of St. Croix Valley Rec Center, reviewed the general terms of the agreement which would start a year from now and continue for five years. Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Collins, to adopt Resolution 2019‐089, a resolution approving the agreement between the City of Stillwater and the Mahtomedi Youth Hockey Association for ice time at St. Croix Valley Recreation Center and Lily Lake Ice Arena. All in favor. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS Councilmember Polehna noted that the City lost a true patriot when the “last man” of the “Last Man’s Club” passed away last week. He also stated the Yellow Ribbon Pheasant Hunt is scheduled for December. CLOSED SESSION Motion by Councilmember Collins, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to recess to Closed Session pursuant to Minn. Stat. §13D.05 subd. 3(b) to discuss attorney‐client privileged communication regarding 121 Chestnut Street East. All in favor. The meeting was recessed to closed session at 9.04 p.m. Present: Mayor Kozlowski, Councilmembers Collins, Junker, Weidner and Polehna. Also present: City Administrator McCarty, City Attorney Land, Attorney Peter Mikhail and Community Development Director Turnblad. Motion by Councilmember Junker seconded by Councilmember Collins to re‐open the meeting. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Junker seconded by Councilmember Collins to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk City Council Meeting August 20, 2019 Page 10 of 10 Resolution 2019‐086, a resolution amending Resolution 2018‐173, adopting 2019 Fee Schedule Resolution 2019‐088, resolution accepting proposal on the competitive negotiated sale of $3,065,000 General Obligation Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 2019A, providing for their issuance and levying a tax for payment thereof Resolution 2019‐089, a resolution approving the agreement between the City of Stillwater and the Mahtomedi Youth Hockey Association for ice time at St. Croix Valley Recreation Center and Lily Lake Ice Arena Page 1 LIST OF BILLS Action Rental Inc.Equipment repair charges 221.00 Advance Auto Parts Supplies 469.69 Amano McGann Inc Equipment repair charges 1,133.00 Amdahl Locksmith Inc Chris Lock repair 194.50 Anchor Block Company Crack sealing project 669.00 Aspen Mills Uniforms 265.00 Beacon Athletics Park equipment 722.68 BHE Community Solar Solar Energy 6,321.91 Blue Tarp Financial Supplies 25.97 Board of Water Commissioners WAC Charges 6,831.00 Bolton and Menk Inc.Lift station repair 803.50 Brock White Co. LLC Road sealant 7,135.92 Brueghel Judith Reimburse for shipping 13.00 Burks Tree and Landscape Care Tree Care 1,903.00 CDW Government Inc.Supplies 599.30 Century Power Equipment Equipment repair supplies 36.78 Cintas Corporation Uniform & mat cleaning 578.70 Cities Digital Solutions Records retention 721.35 Cole Papers Supplies 393.93 Core & Main Storm sewer repair supplies 522.02 Dalco Janitorial supplies 195.08 Davids Hydro Vac Hydro vac services 1,670.50 Door Service Company Handicap push plate repair 354.00 ECM Publishers Publications 114.00 Fire Safety U.S.A.Streamlight LED Survivor 550.00 FleetPride Mower PTO shaft 1,723.86 Fleischhaker Dave Reimburse for work boots 159.99 Foremost Promotions Fire education materials 1,351.28 Frontier Ag & Turf - Rentals 400 gal water tank for truck 5,105.00 Gertens Wholesale Athletic mix 1,864.25 Goodyear Commercial Tire Tires 524.18 Graci Leadership Solutions LLC Supervision fundamentals 1,250.00 Grainger Equipment repair supplies 354.98 Greiner Michael Reimburse for mileage 165.18 Heritage Embroidery & Design Uniforms 39.96 Heritage Printing Inc.Parking enforcement door hangers 224.30 Hull ADR Services David Hoover vs City 1,225.00 Inspectron Inc Plan Review 27,950.00 Kuehn Michael Reimburse for work boots 160.00 Loffler Companies IT Professional Services 785.00 Madden Galanter Hansen LLP Labor Relations Services 48.00 MailFinance Inc Postage machine lease 455.01 Mansfield Oil Company Fuel 12,379.15 Marshall Electric Company Palmer Park meter 150.00 Melstrom Jeff Reimburse for work boots 160.00 Page 2 Menards Supplies 3,496.90 Metropolitan Council Monthly SAC 13,305.90 Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors Maintenance agreement 1,963.00 MN Rural Water Association Operator Expo 600.00 Modern Heating & Air MUA Public Works 340.00 MTI Distributing Equipment repairs supplies 336.55 My Alarm Center Alarm Monitoring Services 105.12 Nagell Appraisal 2019 Street Improvement 9,000.00 National Fire Protection Association Fire education banners and brochures 355.55 Northland Appliance Service Repair 183.45 O'Reilly Auto Parts Flasher for gate 20.89 Pearson Bros. Inc.Materials for seal coat project 41,791.00 Quill Corporation Office supplies 137.44 Reedy Jennifer Ford Refund of parking ramp permits 100.00 River Valley Printing Inc.Business cards 39.00 Robole Donna Reimburse for MPELRA conference expenses 556.20 Roettger Welding Inc.Fence 800.00 Service on a Shoestring Recycling Coordinator Services 10,596.00 SF Mobile Vision Car video system 4,608.00 Sherwin Williams Paint 633.47 SHI International Corp Software maintenance agreements 2,543.00 Simplifile LC Filing fee 100.00 SiteOne Landscape Supply Outdoor controller 256.53 St. Croix Boat and Packet Co.Ramp cleaning 810.00 St. Croix Recreation Fun Playgrounds Park equipment 1,268.00 State Historic Preservation Office SHPO Conference 300.00 Stillwater Motor Company Vehicle service 50.38 Sun Control of MN Sun control window film 19,794.00 T.A. Schifsky and Sons Asphalt 607.02 Tait Graham E Reimburse for lodging for APA conference 127.28 Tessman Seed Co. St. Paul Fertilizer 444.56 The Greater Dog Refund of SUP fees 225.00 Tri-State Bobcat Equipment repair supplies & rental 680.87 Verizon Wireless Wireless Service 2,324.58 Walmart Community Supplies 589.92 Wellner Wade Reimburse for Work Boots 160.00 Wolf Beth Reimburse for B&C picnic supplies 14.96 Xcel Energy Energy 33,264.58 Zee Medical Service First aid supplies 188.55 CREDIT CARDS Amazon.com Supplies 2,111.76 AMEM Annual Conference 225.00 ARC Document Solutions LLC Paper 107.96 Backgroundchecks.com Back ground checks 448.85 Breezy Point Resort Lodging for conference 615.00 Page 3 Dey Distributing Dishwasher repair parts 43.49 Dive Rescue International Inc Dive floats 90.99 Doty Belt Medical lifting belt 74.62 Dropbox Subscription for sharing lg files with contractors 450.00 Grand Pizza & Catering Training lunch 89.01 Landscape Restoration Inc Site cleaning in Bridgewater Park- materials 84.00 Lowes Home Centers Inc.Supplies 699.80 Pizza Man of Stillwater Pizzas for officers working case in Stillwater 60.00 Radisson Hotel Duluth Lodging for conference 293.80 Secure by Design Inc Ninite subscription 240.00 Washington County Parks Vehicle Park Pass 215.32 Wolf Marine Inc.Fuel 178.86 Zero Abuse Project Training - Vetsch 130.97 REC CENTER AT&T Mobility Cell phone 176.43 Becker Arena Products Equipment repair supplies 675.62 Brady Doug Reimburse for mileage 68.73 Cintas Corporation Mat cleaning service 103.00 Coca-Cola Distribution Beverages for concessions 525.36 Comcast TV Internet & Voice 373.65 HDR Architecture Dome Project 6,887.72 Holiday Credit Office Fuel 15.68 Jaytech Inc Cooling water treatment 718.88 Menards Equipment repair supplies 137.37 Riedell Shoes Inc.Skates 121.55 Sentry Systems Inc.Alarm monitoring 140.85 LIBRARY Advantage Computer Systems Hearing Loops Storytime Room 6,600.00 Annie Mack Music Programs 850.00 Brodart Co Materials 1,987.06 Creason Kaylin Staff Reimbursement 187.43 Hedin Sue Programs 91.06 Midwest Tape Materials 70.28 Office of MN IT Services Phone 143.70 Otis Elevator Company Elevator SVC Contract 579.42 Premier Lighting Inc LED Conversion 6,672.24 SHI International Corp Library IT Project 3,128.00 Thorager Natasha Programs 335.00 Washington County Library Materials 570.68 Page 4 LIBRARY CREDIT CARDS Amazon.com Supplies 180.92 Candyland Programs 30.00 Country Messenger Materials - Periodicals 26.00 Dream Host Web Hosting 15.99 Horizon Datasys Corp Library IT Project - Reboot Restore 1,010.10 River Market Co-Op Programs 30.00 TechSoup Adobe Acrobat Pro & Photo Shop 209.00 VistaPrint.com Supplies 71.95 ORDINANCE _________ AN ORDINANCE CREATING ARTICLE 31-301, RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND AMENDING ARTICLE 31-315, ALLOWABLE USES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. Article 31-301 of the City Code, Rural Residential District is hereby created as follows: (a) Purpose. The purpose of the RR district shall be to maintain large lot neighborhood design and characteristics in areas where urban services are unavailable. (b) Allowable uses. 1. See Table in Section 31-315 for the allowable uses within this district. (c) Detached accessory buildings. 1. No detached accessory buildings may be located within the required front yard. 2. All detached accessory buildings located within a side yard must be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side lot line in the case of an interior lot or 40 feet in the case of a corner lot. 3. All detached accessory buildings located in the rear yard must be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the rear lot line. (d) Massing regulations. 1. Minimum standards. 1 Lot area per dwelling One (1) acre Lot width 100 feet Lot depth 300 feet Front yard setback 40 feet Interior Side yard setback 15 feet (COS) Exterior yard setback 40 feet Rear yard setback 50 feet Maximum lot coverage 25% Height of residence 35 feet Height of accessory structures 20 feet and not exceeding height of main residential structure 2. Additional setback standards. 2 Trunk Highway 96 (Stonebridge Trail to Co Rd. 15) 100 feet McKusick Road (Neal Ave. to Co Rd. 15) 100 feet County Rd. 12 (Northland Ave. to Co Rd. 15) 100 feet County Rd. 15 (Trunk Highway 36 to Trunk Highway 96) 100 feet Railroad 75 feet 1 All standards are minimum requirements unless otherwise noted. 2 Measured from right-of-way line. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. Article 31-315 of the City Code, Allowable Uses in Residential Districts, is hereby amended to add the following: 14 Sales of fresh, whole, raw, or processed produce grown onsite only and sold onsite at a farm stand, at farmers’ markets or by delivery. 15 Storage of personal operable vehicles, including any car, truck or trailer, or self-propelled or pull-behind recreational vehicles, including, but not limited to, snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, watercraft, golf carts, etc. so long as adequately screened by fence or landscaped from roadways and neighboring views. No outside business storage is permitted. SECTION 3. SUMMARY PUBLICATION. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS RR Single-family dwelling 1 P Accessory dwelling (See Section 31-501) P Type I home occupation (See Section 31-500) P Type II home occupation (See Section 31-500) CUP Accessory building and use A Short Term Home Rental; Type A and B P Short Term Home Rental; Type C CUP Agricultural produce sales P14 Essential services P Small Wireless Facilities in the Right-of-Way P Personal Outdoor Storage P15 The ordinance amendment establishes a purpose for a new Rural Residential zoning district while establishing the allowable uses of, and the massing regulations and setback standards for new structures proposed within the district. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective after its passage and publication according to law. Approved this 20th day of August, 2019. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk Publish: Stillwater Gazette – ______________________ CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DENYING A CONCEPT PUD AMENDMENT, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, A PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND A PARTIAL EASEMENT VACATION PROPOSED FOR OUTLOT D IN LIBERTY VILLAGE CPC CASE NO. 2019-36 WHEREAS, the Todd Konigson of livwell.design has requested a Concept PUD amendment to allow for three-story buildings in Liberty Village; and WHEREAS, according to the established process, on July 24th, 2019, the Planning Commission heard the request and recommended conditional approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on August 20th, 2019, the City Council heard the request, took testimony from city staff, the applicant and members of the public and made the following findings: 1. The applicant did not comply with the original PUD conditions requiring Development Architectural Control Committee approval; 2. The submitted concept design proposed a 3-story structure, which exceeds the maximum height of the zoning district, which is 2.5 stories; 3. The submitted concept design is not compatible with the character of the design of adjacent development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council denies the concept PUD amendment for Liberty Village. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota this 3rd day of September, 2019. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2019 - CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DENYING A LOT SIZE VARIANCE AND LOT SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1422 NORTH MARTHA STREET CPC CASE NO. 2019-37 WHEREAS, Trustees of the Edmund H. Studtman Trust submitted a formal request for a variance and a subdivision of the property they own at 1422 North Martha Street; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the application was to create a second buildable parcel on the property that would have a size of 6,337 square feet, whereas the minimum required lot size for the subject zoning district is 7,500 square feet; and WHEREAS, on July 15, 2019 the Planning Commission considered the variance associated with the case and denied it on a 4 – 1 vote; subsequently the property owners appealed the variance denial to the City Council; and WHEREAS, upon City Council consideration of the appeal, a super majority of the Council Members found that though there are lots smaller than 7,500 square feet in the neighborhood, those lots were created in the distant past and that creating substandard lots is no longer common practice in the City nor is it supported by the current City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Stillwater denies the lot size variance and consequently also denies the requested lot subdivision. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota this 3rd day of September, 2019. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2019- RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRACT WITH HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, INC FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO CONDUCT A DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY WHEREAS, on July 30, 2019 the City Council of the City of Stillwater approved the selection of Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc (HKGi)to assist the City with the a parking capacity study for Downtown Stillwater; and WHEREAS, HKGi has submitted a contract letter dated August 27, 2019, which fairly represent the scope of services as requested by the City, as well as contractual terms and conditions, schedule, and other details as found acceptable to both the City of Stillwater and HKGi. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Stillwater City Council hereby approves the August 27, 2019 contract letter. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. _____________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk Creative Solutions for Land Planning and Design 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 August 27, 2019 Bill Turnblad Community Development Director City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Subject: An Agreement between the City of Stillwater and Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. for services pertaining to the Downtown Parking Efficiency Study Dear CLIENT; This letter outlines a Scope of Services, Fee Schedule and other elements which together constitute an agreement between the City of Stillwater hereinafter referred to as the CLIENT, and Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT for the Downtown Parking Efficiency Study, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT. The CLIENT and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: A. BASIC SERVICES The CONSULTANT’S basic services for the PROJECT are as provided in Attachment A Work Program. B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The CONSULTANT and the CLIENT may agree in writing to amend this Contract for additional services related to the PROJECT and compensation for such services. The following services have not been requested by the CLIENT but are available upon written authorization. 1. Meetings in addition to those specified in Paragraph A above. 2. Services or Deliverables not specifically identified in Paragraph A above. C. FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The CONSULTANT agrees to complete the scope of work contained in Paragraph A in exchange for professional fee compensation as noted below. The CLIENT agrees to pay the CONSULTANT for PROJECT services rendered as follows: 1. For the CONSULTANT’S Basic Services described in Paragraph A above, a fee based on the CONSULTANT’S current hourly rate schedule (see Attachment B) not- to-exceed $25,000 inclusive of expenses as noted in Paragraph A. Downtown Parking Efficiency Study August 27, 2019 Page 2 2. For the CONSULTANT’S Additional Services described in Paragraph B, a fee based on the CONSULTANT’S current hourly rate schedule plus incidental expenses or a negotiated fee. 3. Invoices will be submitted electronically (PDF form) to the CLIENT via email on a monthly basis as work is completed and shall be payable within 30 days in accordance with this Agreement. 4. The CONSULTANT reserves the right to suspend services if the CLIENT is delinquent in making payments in accordance with this Agreement. D. CLIENT’S RESPONSIBILITY The CLIENT shall be responsible for the following: 1. Assembly of background information including, but not limited to digital copies of all files, pertinent plans, aerial photographs, base maps, inventory data, available GIS mapping, limited to those that are reasonably available. 2. Arrangements and notification for public meetings and stakeholder meetings. 3. Reproduction and distribution of Project reports as deemed necessary and not otherwise specified in paragraph A. 4. Participation in team workshops as needed. 5. Presentation of draft materials to stakeholder groups as required. 6. Provide traffic and municipal engineering support to the project as needed. E. INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall maintain insurance of the kind and in the amounts shown below for the life of the contract. Certificates for General Liability Insurance should state that the CLIENT, its officials, employees, agents and representatives are Additional Insureds. The CLIENT reserves the right to review CONSULTANT’s insurance policies at any time to verify that contractual requirements have been met. 1. Commercial General Liability Insurance $2,000,000 per occurrence $3,000,000 general aggregate $300,000 damage to rented premises $15,000 medical expenses 2. Umbrella Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence $1,000,000 general aggregate $10,000 self-insured retention Downtown Parking Efficiency Study August 27, 2019 Page 3 3. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability a. Worker’s Compensation per Minnesota Statutes b. Employer’s Liability $500,000 per accident; $500,000 per employee; $500,000 per disease policy limit. 4. Professional Liability Insurance $2,000,000 per claim $4,000,000 annual aggregate F. COMPLETION SCHEDULE The services of the CONSULTANT will begin upon CLIENT approval and will, absent of causes beyond the control of the CONSULTANT, be completed within eight months of the date that the CLIENT issues a notice to proceed. The notice to proceed shall come from an authorized representative of the City. G. NONDISCRIMINATION The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate by reason of age, race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or handicap unrelated to the duties of a position, of applicants for employment or employees as to terms of employment, promotion, demotion or transfer, recruitment, layoff or termination, compensation, selection for training, or participation in recreational and educational activities. H. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT, in compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants for employment are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT shall post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided by the Government setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. The CONSULTANT shall state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. Downtown Parking Efficiency Study August 27, 2019 Page 4 I. INDEMNIFICATION CLIENT and CONSULTANT agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless, and their respective officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, to the extent such claims, losses, damages or expenses are caused by the indemnifying party's negligent acts, errors, or omissions. In the event claims, losses, damages or expenses are caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of the CLIENT and CONSULTANT, they shall be borne by each party in proportion to its negligence J. TERM, TERMINATION, SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS 1. The Term of this Agreement shall be concurrent with the work authorized and shall be in accordance with the schedule to be established between the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT. 2. Either party may terminate this Agreement by written notice to the other party at its address by certified mail at least ten (10) days prior to the date of termination. 3. Neither the CLIENT nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 4. The time schedule shall not apply and/or time extensions will be allowed for any circumstances beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by all applicable laws. 6. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to fees earned through the effective date of termination. K. DISPUTES In the event the CLIENT and CONSULTANT are unable to reach agreement under the terms of this contract, disputes shall be resolved using alternative dispute resolution (ADR). L. REVOCATION If this agreement is not signed and accepted by both parties within 90 days of the contract date, it shall become null and void. M. AUTHORIZATION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The CLIENT and the CONSULTANT have made and executed this Agreement for Professional Services, This day of , 2016 Downtown Parking Efficiency Study August 27, 2019 Page 5 CLIENT City of Stillwater Name Title Name Title CONSULTANT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Name: Title Name: Title ATTACHMENT A – WORK PROGRAM Phase One Tasks Task 1: Project Coordination One or two check-ins per week with City Staff via phone or email Task 2: Engagement Consultant will attend and facilitate up to three meetings with the Parking Commission. City staff will be responsible for coordinating and scheduling the meetings. The purpose and intent for each meeting is described below: o Meeting #1: Consultant will meet with the Parking Commission to discuss key findings from the utilization counts and peer review research (see Task 3). o Meeting #2: Consultant will present draft recommendations to the Parking Commission for their consideration. The purpose of this meeting is to reach a consensus on the study results. o Meeting #3: Consultant will meet with the Parking Commission to review the final deliverables and scope Phase II activities. Task 3: Exploration Phase Task 3.1: Data Collection and Mapping Data collected under this task will determine parking utilization rates by parking facility and provide a baseline for confirming parking concerns. Consultant will utilize existing utilization counts (provide by the City) to build base maps depicting the study area’s parking attributes and utilization rates. Findings will help identify potential parking reservoirs that are underutilized. The parking reservoirs may present opportunities for employee parking or mitigate the parking needs/requirements for new uses or redevelopment initiatives. Task 3.2: Review existing regulatory structure and funding strategies Zoning ordinance Funding/financing policy o Capital expenditures o Ongoing operations and maintenance Task 3.3: Peer Review Consultant will research up to five comparison downtowns for comparing their parking requirements, district-wide parking models, pricing structure and financing mechanisms. Findings from this task will help inform potential modifications to the City’s parking requirements, pricing and district-wide parking approach. Task 3.4: Employee Survey Consultant will work with City Staff to prepare an online survey to better understand the number of employees working in Downtown Stillwater during specific days and times. The survey results will help inform Task 3.2 and 4.2. The City will be responsible for distributing the survey. Task 3.5: Parking Generation Model Data collected under Task 3.1 will be integrated into a customized “parking generation model.” The purpose of the model is to help determine the parking needs for new uses or future redevelopment efforts. Model assumptions will utilize the city’s parking requirements and policies to determine the study area’s current and future parking demand. The model will be used to run future parking scenarios based on future land use and redevelopment assumptions and parking reduction factors (e.g., parking demand rates that reflect current utilization, best practices, or multimodal goals). The “parking generation model” will help determine when a new use or redevelopment initiative is unable to meet parking demands without building new off street parking supply. Task 3 Deliverables Base maps depicting the study area’s parking utilization and attributes. Memorandum documenting existing conditions and findings from the peer review. Development of an on-line survey for the City’s use. Parking generation model developed in Microsoft Excel. Task 4: Strategies and Recommendations Task 4.1: Event Parking Consultant will develop recommendations for managing parking needs during large events (e.g., Lumber Jack Days and Harvest Fest). Various parking strategies may include shared parking opportunities, shuttle services, and travel demand management strategies. Task 4.2: Employee Parking Consultant will develop recommendations for managing parking needs for downtown employees. Various parking strategies may include shared parking opportunities, shuttle services, and travel demand management strategies. Task 4.3: Enterprise Fund Evaluation Consultant will develop a funding tool that compares Downtown Stillwater’s Enterprise Fund (fee-in-lieu payments for parking requirements) against other models. The model’s assumptions will be based on findings from Task 3.3. Task 4.4: Parking Framework The main objective throughout the planning process is to focus on an action/phasing plan that outlines recommendations and strategies that maximize downtown’s parking supply. The recommendations and strategies will focus on the following: o Employee parking o Event parking o Parking solutions for new uses or redevelopment initiatives o Modifications to the parking ordinance (i.e., requirements and Enterprise Fund model) Task 4 Deliverables Memo documenting the proposed parking strategies and recommendations. Financial model developed in Microsoft Excel. Task 5: Final Deliverables Task 5.1: Draft Report Consultant will provide a technical memorandum documenting the study’s process and findings. Supporting materials used throughout the process (e.g., GIS files, spreadsheets, maps, and power points) will be provided as part of the final deliverables. Task 5.2: City Council Consultant will attend one City Council meeting and present the study’s findings and recommendations. Task 5Deliverables Consolidation of the Task 3 and 4 memorandums into a final report. Preparation and attendance at one City Council meeting. Phase Two Tasks Once Phase I activities are complete, consultant will prepare a detailed scope of work and budget for Phase Two which will focus on implementation measures, while formalizing a preferred district-wide parking approach. This will be done in close collaboration with City Staff and the Parking Commission. Potential activities may include: Stakeholder engagement to reach a consensus on the study’s recommendations Zoning amendments Wayfinding and signage plan Cost estimates for the recommendations Shared parking agreements STAFF REQUEST ITEM I Department: MIS I Date: 8/30/2019 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is) Approval of Microsoft Licensing renewal. This is a renewal year for our licenses with Microsoft. The number budgeted for this year was based on our previous agreement with Microsoft. Microsoft made some significant changes in their licensing structure and we had increases in the amount of licenses needed. FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request) Total amount of the renewal is $40,378.00. This is an increased amount than what was budgeted for this renewal. We will need an additional $8,378.00. By reprioritizing Capital Outlay dollars, we should be able to accommodate this increase in price. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED Yes X No --- ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. Submitted by: Rose Holman Date: 8/30/2019 Rt=.~ JV( J,\~ I) .ft,,p ~Vii L., ~ }111 ~ I G-r'l ~M/NIS~,i,,e_ f3C,{ 6lo t"{ MN CITY OF STILLWATER -- Rose Holman 216 N. FOURTH STREET ATIN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE STILLWATER, MN 55082 United States Phone : (651) 430-8804 Fax: Email : rholman@ci.stillwater .mn .us All Prices are in US Dollar (USO) Product CoreCAL ALNG SA MVL Pltfrm UsrCAL Microsoft -Part#: W06-01072 2 OfficeProPlus ALNG SA MVL Pltfrm Microsoft -Part#: 269-12442 3 OfficeProPlus ALNG LicSAPk MVL Pltfrm (NEW) Microsoft -Part#: 269-12445 4 WlNENTperDVC ALNG SA MVL Pltfrm Microsoft -Part#: KV3-00353 --- 5 WlNENTperDVC ALNG UpgrdSAPk MVL Pltfrm (NEW) Microsoft -Part#: KV3-00356 6 ExchgSvrStd ALNG SA MVL M icrosoft -Part#: 312-02257 7 SharePointSvr ALNG SA MVL Microsoft -Part#: H04-00268 8 SQLSvrStdCore ALNG SA MVL 2Lic Corelic Microsoft -Part#: 7NQ-00292 9 WinSvrDCCore ALNG SA MVL 2Lic CoreLic Microsoft -Part#: 9EA-00278 10 WinSvrSTDCore ALNG SA MVL 2Lic Corelic Microsoft -Part#: 9EM-00270 Pricing Proposal Quotation #: 17596253 Created On : 8/16/2019 Valid Until : 9/15/2019 Inside Account Executive Michael Williamson 290 Davidson Ave . Somerset NJ 08873 Phone : 800-4 77-64 79 Fax : 800-4 77 -64 79 Email : Michael_Williamson@shi .com Qty Your Price Total 170 $45.00 $7 ,650.00 80 $95.00 $7,600.00 65 $164 .00 $10 ,660 .00 80 $43.00 $3 ,440 .00 65 $56.00 $3,640 .00 1 $127.00 $127 .00 $1,213.00 $1,213 .00 4 $585 .00 $2,340 .00 26 $126.00 $3 ,276 .00 24 $18.00 $432 .00 Subtotal $40 ,378 .00 Total $40 .378 .00 Additional Comments Thank you for choosing SHI International Corp! The pricing offered on this quote proposal is valid through the expiration date set above. To ensure the best level of service, please provide End User Name, Phone Number, Email Address and applicable Contract Number when submitting a Purchase Order. SHI International Corp. is 100% Minority Owned, Woman Owned Business. TAX ID# 22-3009648; DUNS# 61-1429481; CCR# 61-243957G; CAGE 1 HTFO The Products offered under this proposal are resold in accordance with the SHI Online Customer Resale Terms and Conditions. unless a separate resale agreement exists between SHI and the Customer. PLANNING REPORT TO: Mayor & City Council DATE: August 26, 2019 TOPIC: Ordinance amendment related to the seasonal food vending process REPORT BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION Several seasonal food vending items were discussed by the City Council at the July 2019 work session. One item was to support a staff request to allow an ordinance amendment that would change the review process for seasonal food vending permits. Instead of requiring the Planning Commission to review and approve these permits, they could be done administratively by city staff. REQUEST Staff requests City Council to approve the first reading of the attached ordinance, which assigns review of seasonal food vending permits to city staff. Attachments: Legislative version Ordinance bt Sec. 41-7. - Seasonal outdoor sales. Subd. 2. Seasonal food vending. Seasonal food vending is allowed by annual permit only on private property as an accessory use within the CBD zoning district, subject to the requirements of this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision, "seasonal food vending" does not include food vending for events. Event food vending requires an event permit pursuant to City Resolution No. 2010-204 and any subsequent revisions to that resolution. The annual permit for a seasonal food vending cart or vehicle may be approved by the city subject to the following: (1) A completed permit application form must be submitted annually (including permit fee) to the community development department. The completed application must be submitted at least 60 days prior to the first seasonal usage of the cart or vehicle. To be considered complete, the application must include the completed application form, permit fee, and the following additional information. (a) Address of the private property upon which the cart or vehicle will operate. (b) Site and operations plans detailing at least the following: 1. Size and location of the area being occupied by the seasonal food vending operation. 2. Color photographs or renderings and dimensions of all four sides of the vehicle or cart, including exterior facade design. (1) If the food vending cart or vehicle is proposed to remain in place for a period of 20 hours or greater, the exterior facade design shall require a design permit as reviewed and approved by the heritage preservation commission. (2) The design permit standards shall include the following: (a) The food vending cart or trailer shall generally follow the adopted Commercial Historic District Design Manual and not be generic in design. 1. White utility trailers are not permitted without significant exterior design improvements. (b) The exterior of the food vending cart or trailer shall not contain neon colored/fluorescent paint. (c) The food vending cart or trailer shall not contain neon lighting, display any moving parts, be illuminated with any flashing or intermittent lights, nor may it incorporate any animation. No device may be illuminated to obscure or mimic an official traffic sign or signal. This includes indoor lighting which is visible from public streets. (d) The food vending cart or trailer shall not use outside sound amplification, televisions or other similar visual displays, nor may it use noisemakers such as bells, horns or whistles. 3. Location of exits from principal building on the property. The vending equipment and operation must not block the exits. 4. Storage location for vehicle or cart when not open for business. 5. Method of containing trash and recycling. 6. Pedestrian and traffic control safety measures. The sales area may not impede pedestrian or vehicular circulation patterns on or around the site. 7. Parking stalls. If parking stalls are being used by the vending operation, this must be indicated on the site plan. The total number of parking spaces required of the principal use of the private property shall not be reduced below the minimum number required by ordinance. 8. Miscellaneous operation details including: a) dates and hours of operation, b) merchandise or service being offered for sale, and c) contact information for the landowner, the applicant, and the manager of the seasonal vending operation. (c) Utility plan. Indicate how utilities will be provided to the operation. (d) Signage plan. The annual permit application must include details of all proposed signage. A drawing for each proposed sign shall be submitted. The drawing shall show dimensions and describe materials, lettering, colors, illumination and support systems. The proposed signage shall be reviewed against the following standards. 1. The total number of signs associated with a seasonal vending operation is limited to two. 2. All signage for the seasonal vending operation must be contained on the subject private property. 3. One sandwich board type sign may be permitted if it satisfies the standards found in the policy adopted by the city council on November 11, 2008, and updated on July 8, 2009, and any subsequent revisions to that resolution. 4. One sign may be painted or affixed directly to the vehicle or cart. 5. No sign associated with the seasonal vending operation is allowed to be on the subject property when the cart or vehicle is not present. (e) Signed agreement from the property owner allowing the proposed seasonal vending operation. (2) Submittal of a satisfactory inspection report of the proposed cart or vehicle from the Stillwater Fire Department. (3) Submittal of a permit issued for the cart or vehicle by Washington County health officials. (4) The annual permit for the first year of operation shall be reviewed by the planning commission. The first year permit shall be valid through December 31 of the year. (5) The annual permit for subsequent years of operation shall be reviewed by community development department staff, unless there are substantial changes to the site plan or operations plan, or unless there are substantiated complaints of a public safety or public health nature. If there are such substantial changes or complaints, the planning commission must review the annual permit application for that year. (65) Seasonal food vending is only allowed on private property. No seasonal food vending permits will be issued for operation on public property or public rights-of-way. (76) For public safety reasons, all seasonal food vending operations must close by 2:30 a.m. each day. Also, if during large events it is determined by the chief of police that downtown crowd control is necessary, seasonal food vending businesses may be required to close earlier than 2:30 a.m. during that event. ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 41, ENTITLED SEASONAL OUTDOOR SALES BY AMENDING THE REVIEW PROCESS FOR SEASONAL FOOD VENDING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. Delete City Code Section 41-7, Subdivision 2, Subsections (4) and (5) and replace them with the following: (4) The annual permit shall be reviewed by community development department staff. 2. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapter 41-7 shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this _______ day of September 3, 2019. CITY OF STILLWATER _______________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk PLANNING REPORT TO: City Council CASE NO.: HPC 2019-19 REPORT DATE: August 28, 2019 MEETING DATE: September 3, 2019 APPLICANT: N/A LANDOWNER: Reid and Julie Miller REQUEST: Consideration of the designation of 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site LOCATION: 615 Broadway Street South ZONING: RA, Single-Family Residential REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION On March 2, 2019 the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) considered a request from Reid and Julie Miller for the demolition of their residential structure located at 615 Broadway Street South. The HPC denied the demolition permit on the basis there was a feasible alternative to demolition of this historic resource. On April 16, 2019 the City Council upheld the HPC’s decision and ordered the preparation of a Designation Study (Study). Prepared by the 106 Group, the Nels Hanson home designation study is attached 615 Broadway St. South, Photo Credit: Google Images (August, 2018) HPC Case no. 2019-03 & 2019-17 Page 2 for Council review. The attached Study notes the Nels Hanson House was constructed during the Development of Residential Neighborhoods Historic Context period but that the property is not eligible to be listed under any of the City’s applicable historic criteria identified in City Code Section 22-7, Subd. 4(2). The 106 Group’s recommendation indicates “[b]ecause the Nels Hanson House does not meet any of the local Heritage Preservation Site criteria as an individual property, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site”. As the designation study was prepared as a result of the denial of a demolition, City Code dictates the City must hold public hearings regarding the designation of the structure as a heritage preservation site. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of the designation of 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site. ANALYSIS The adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies the goal to “safeguard the heritage of the city by preserving historic properties which reflect Stillwater’s cultural, social, economic, political, visual, aesthetic or architectural history”. Specific objectives, policies and programs include “encourage compatible remodeling, restoration, and/or reuse of historic buildings, including homes” and to “adopt housing/historic preservation regulations and performance standards to maintain the city’s existing housing stock”. Since the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City has adopted an updated demolition review ordinance (a preservation regulation tool) to help locally designate properties worthy of historic preservation. While the City has reviewed requests for demolition of structures 50 years old or greater since the mid-1990s, the existing ordinance requires the review of demolition requests for structures built prior to 1946, the ending of the era of the City’s periods of [historical] significance. This property was surveyed as part of the 1996 Stillwater South Hill Historic Preservation Planning Area survey. At that time it was determined the house was not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places though it did fit into the Development of Residential Neighborhoods in Stillwater, 1850s-1940s local historic context. This preliminary, reconnaissance-level survey was intended to cover a large neighborhood area. Though one area of the survey area contained a high concentration of homes and was identified as a potential historic district, this home was not in that area. Those findings, however, do not imply the structure was/is not locally eligible for consideration. When a Comprehensive Plan is updated and adopted, the City is required to update its Zoning Code, ordinances and other community policies to reflect the Comprehensive Plan goals. The City has adopted new preservation objectives and programs to help preserve and protect historic resources. The City has created a policy to hire an independent third party to assess the structure’s significance in relationship to the City’s adopted designation criteria. Though not required by City Code, the City’s Demolition Designation Study pre-approval process requires consulting firms and all agencies meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications HPC Case no. 2019-03 & 2019-17 Page 3 Standards (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983). Erin Que, 106 Group Architectural Historian, meets these qualifications. While much of the existing residence is not historic, the front 25’ of the structure remains relatively unchanged, Miss Que’s independent and impartial analysis has determined the site to not be eligible for local listing despite the known vertical plank construction type, “typical of originally company-built mining towns, lumber camps, tenant or workers cottages on farms, and summer resort communities that were popular around the turn of the last century”1. While staff and some members of the HPC and Council maintain the front portion of the home has local significance, if only as it retains similar character and that it sits in the exact location as it did when it was originally constructed, the City’s Heritage Preservation ordinance mirrors national standards. These standards require a greater level of uniqueness, character, interest, etc. As such, factors such as longevity (or other locally-determined values, priorities and goals) cannot be the sole basis for designation. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Recommend approval of the designation of the structure at 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site. B. Recommend denial of the designation of the structure at 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The process for review of the demolition and the subsequent designation proceedings is in line with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s identified historic preservation objectives, policies, and programs. However, the demolition of the structure is in conflict with the housing policies to maintain existing housing, including the preservation of homes in good condition. As the preservation regulations pertaining to designation criteria have not been updated to reflect changing local values, designation of this structure would be in conflict with adopted City Code regulations, ordinances and community policies. Heritage Preservation Commission At their August 21, 2019 regular meeting, the HPC held a public hearing regarding the designation. At the end of the public hearing, the Commission determined (in a 6-0) vote to recommend the City Council not designate the structure as a heritage preservation site. Planning Commission City Code Section 21-7, Subd. 4(3) indicates the Planning Commission (PC) must make a recommendation to the Heritage Preservation Commission to approve, reject, or to modify the proposed designation. On July 24, 2019 the Planning Commission discussed the proposed designation in relationship to the comprehensive plan, the effect of the demolition on the neighborhood, and other planning considerations which may be relevant to the proposed designation. The Planning Commission is recommending denial of the designation. 1 http://www.oldhouseweb.com/how-to-advice/boxhouse-plank-construction.shtml HPC Case no. 2019-03 & 2019-17 Page 4 State Historic Preservation Office In a July 23, 2019 letter from the State Historic Preservation Office, Michael Koop supports the 106 Group’s findings by indicating “we do not find that the Hanson House exhibits the qualities necessary to quality for local designation under any of the criteria listed in Stillwater’s preservation ordinance”. Staff Since the HPC’s public hearing, it has been verified the home was once the residence of Bing Crosby’s mother, this factor would not meet one of the criteria for local designation. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the designation for the Nels Hanson House, located at 615 Broadway Street South, allowing for the demolition of the existing residence to be demolished. Attachments: Stillwater HPC Historic Site Designation Registration Form GDO Law letter (July 1, 2019) Michael Koop, MN SHPO (July, 23, 2019) Boosalis Letter (August 13, 2019) Flodin Letter (August 13, 2019) GDO Law Letter (August 13, 2019) Resolution of Denial cc: Reid and Julie Miller John Kirk, Rehkamp Larson Architects Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Historic Site Designation Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name _________________________________________________________________________ Other Names __________________________________________________________________________ SHPO No. _____________________ 2. Location Street Address _________________________________________________________________________ City __________________________ State __________ County __________ Zip Code ____________ 3. Heritage Preservation Commission Certification The Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission determined that this site is eligible for designation as a Heritage Preservation Site. Chair Date 4. City Council Certification The City Council approved designation of this site as a Heritage Preservation Site. Mayor Date 5. Classification Ownership of Property: ___ Private ___Public-local ___Public-State ___ Public-Federal Number of Resources within Property ______________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions ___________________________________________ Current Functions ___________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Style __________________________________ Materials foundation _____________________________________ walls _________________________________________ roof __________________________________________ other _________________________________________ Integrity __________________________________ Narrative Description Describe the property on one or more continuation sheets. Name of Property________________________________________ 8. Statement of Significance Applicable Historic Criteria ___ 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Stillwater, State of Minnesota, or the United States.___ 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event.___ 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. ___ 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment.___ 5. Its identification as work of an architectural or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City of Stillwater.___ 6. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. ___ 7. Its unique location, scale or other physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, a district, the community, or the City of Stillwater. Applicable Historic Contexts ___ I. Precontact Period Native American Cultural Traditions___ II. Native Americams, european contact, Initial Setlement___ III. St. Croix Triangle Lumbering___ IV. Town Planning and Development___ V. St. Croix River, Railroads, and Overland Transportation___ VI. Late Nineteenth Century Agricultural Development___ VII. Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Industrial Development___ VIII. Development of Downtown Stillwater___ IX. Development of Residential Neighborhoods___ X . Development of Stillwater City, Washington County, and State Government Date of Construction ____________________________________________________________ Significant Dates ________________________________________________________________ Significant Persons _______________________________________________________________ Architect/ Builder _______________________________________________________________ Previous Documentation: Currently listed on National Register ___ Previous Surveys ___ Narrative Statement of Significance Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets. Name of Property________________________________________ Name of Property________________________________________ 9. Bibliography Use one or more continuation sheets as needed. 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property ________________ Property Identification Number _______________________ UTM References ___ ___________ _____________ ___ ___________ _____________ Form Prepared By Name ________________________________________________________________________________ Organization ___________________________________________ Date _________________________ Address _____________________________________________ Telephone _______________________ City __________________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _____________ Additional Documentation Maps A USGS or city map indicating the property’s location.A sketch map for properties having large acreage or numerous resources. PhotographsRepresentative photographs of the property. Property Owner Name ________________________________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________ Telephone _______________________ City __________________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _____________ Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 1 Narrative Description This one-and-a-half-story house with a partially exposed basement is located on the northeast side of Broadway Street South in the South Hill neighborhood of Stillwater (Map 1). The block on which this house is located is sited on top of a steep bluff that runs parallel to the St. Croix River to the northeast. A limestone retaining wall borders the front yard and features two concrete steps in the center to access the concrete sidewalk that runs to the front door (Figures 1 and 2). A concrete driveway is located along the northwest elevation of the house and slopes downward to the rear of the lot. The rear of the property was not accessible during field survey in May 2019; however, recent photos of the rear elevation were provided by the City of Stillwater (Heritage Preservation Commission [HPC] Staff Report: Case No. 2019-03, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, March 20, 2019). The house rests on a limestone foundation, is clad in vinyl siding, and has a front gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. It is oriented southwest-northeast, due to the orientation of Broadway Street South. The house was built in 1880 and originally was rectangular in plan. It exhibits characteristics of the nineteenth century vernacular architectural style found in Stillwater (Stillwater HPC 2013:12; Washington County 2019). Buildings of this era were typically clad in wood (Stillwater HPC 2013:4). On the southwest-facing façade, there is a one-story, full-width, enclosed porch that exhibits some characteristics of the Colonial Revival style (Figure 3). The porch features painted, square, wood columns; is clad in painted wood paneling beneath the windows; and has dentils beneath the eaves. The porch has a hipped roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. The primary entranceway is located at the southeast end of the porch. The windows on the second story of the house feature inoperable wood shutters. A third-story, square-shaped tower is centrally located on the northwest roof slope. Towers are not considered a character-defining feature of the nineteenth century vernacular architectural style in Stillwater. Towers were commonly built on high-style Stillwater homes (i.e. Queen Anne, Second Empire) during this time period, especially on homes with views over the St. Croix River Valley (Stillwater HPC 2013). The house has undergone several additions since it was constructed in 1880 (Washington County 2019). A one-story, full-width addition was built on the rear (northeast) elevation of the house in 1987 (City of Stillwater 1987). A one-story, bay window addition was built on the southeast elevation in 1996 (City of Stillwater 1996). A one-story, partial-width addition was built on the northeast elevation of the 1987 addition in 2010 (City of Stillwater 2010). The southeast elevation of the house has a partially exposed basement and multiple additions (Figures 4 and 5). The first story features a 1996 one-story, bay window addition in the southwest half (City of Stillwater 1996). This addition rests on a poured concrete foundation, is clad in vinyl siding, and has a hipped roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. To the northeast of the bay window addition, there is an attached pergola that is comprised of wood posts with wood latticework affixed to the top of the posts, and a gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. The construction date of the pergola is not known and could not be discerned from aerial photographs. A secondary entranceway beneath the pergola provides access to an above-ground hot tub. A tall, one-story, gable roof addition is located on the rear (northeast) of the house and projects beyond the original footprint of the house; it was built in 1987 (City of Stillwater 1987). This 1987 addition is clad in vinyl siding and has a front gable roof that is covered Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 2 with asphalt shingles. An exterior, concrete block chimney is located near the south corner of the original house, and is attached to the southwest wall of the rear addition; it was built between 2013-2015 (Google 2013; Microsoft 2015). A wood deck wraps around the southwest and southeast elevations of the addition and connects to a larger deck on the rear of the house. The construction date of the deck is not known, but may have been built in conjunction with the 1987 addition. Multiple additions are also located on the northeast elevation (Figure 6). The 1987 addition spans the full width of the northeast elevation. The wood deck is attached to the southeast half of the 1987 addition and is accessed by wood steps. A half-width addition was constructed in 2010 on the northwest half of the 1987 addition (City of Stillwater 2010). It is comprised of a fully exposed basement that contains a garage stall, and a tall, one-story screened porch above. The basement level is clad in vinyl siding. The screened porch has a wood frame with wood trusses that extend across the full width of the northeast elevation, creating a pergola over the wood deck. The porch walls are comprised of two-part aluminum screens. The openings in the outward-facing trusses are filled with glass. The porch has a shed roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. On the northwest elevation, the basement is partially exposed in the southwest half and fully exposed in the northeast half (Figure 7). Multiple additions are located on the northwest elevation, which is comprised of, from southwest to northeast, the two-story original house with a third-story tower projection at the northeast end, the 1987 rear addition, and the 2010 rear addition. The roofline on the original house was slightly altered in the 1990s to accommodate a second-story window, near the center (Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). The first- and second-story windows have inoperable wood shutters. The tower features a pyramid roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. According to City records, part of the siding on the tower is damaged and has been covered with plywood with decorative metal filigree and glass (HPC Staff Report: Case No. 2019-03, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, March 20, 2019). The northwest elevation of the 1987 addition consists of a fully exposed basement that contains a two-stall garage, and a first story addition to the house with a bay window and screened porch. The 2010 addition consists of a third garage stall on the basement level and an addition to the screened porch on the first story. The northwest elevation of the porch features a wood frame with two-part aluminum screens and a wood railing. Fenestration on the southwest-facing façade of the front porch, from northwest to southeast, consists of four one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over-one, screen windows; and a single-leaf metal storm door at the southeast end that is flanked by narrow, one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over-one, screen windows. Fenestration on the first story of the southwest-facing façade of the house, from northwest to southeast, consists of a six-over-six, double-hung wood window and a single-leaf wood door with four lights. Fenestration on the second story of the southwest-facing façade consists of two replacement, one-over-one, double-hung, wood windows that are slightly smaller than the original windows (Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 3 Fenestration on the southeast elevation of the front porch consists of three one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over -one, screen windows. Fenestration on the basement level of the house consists of a sliding vinyl window. Fenestration on the first story of the southeast elevation, from southwest to northeast, consists of a fixed, vinyl, octagonal window with faux wood dividers; a single- leaf door of an unknown material; and a vinyl picture window. Fenestration on the 1996 bay window addition consists of two one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers; paired wide one- over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers; and two one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers. Fenestration on the first story of the southwest elevation of the 1987 rear addition consists of a fixed, vinyl window with faux dividers. Fenestration on the first story of the southeast elevation of the rear addition consists of two vinyl picture windows. Fenestration on the second story of the southeast elevation consists of a fixed, vinyl, octagonal window; and two vinyl casement windows with faux dividers. Fenestration on the basement level of the northeast elevation consists of a vinyl window with faux dividers. The type of window operation could not be determined in the field. Fenestration on the first story of the northeast elevation, from southeast to northeast, consists of a tall, fixed, vinyl window with faux dividers; a large, sliding vinyl window; a porch access door of an unknown operation and material; and a tall, fixed, vinyl window with faux dividers. There is no visible fenestration on the second story of the northeast elevation. Fenestration on the basement level of the northwest elevation of the original house consists of three vinyl sliding windows. Fenestration on the basement level of the northwest elevation of the 1987 addition consists of two single-stall, steel, overhead garage doors. Fenestration on the basement level of the northwest elevation of the 2010 addition consists of a single-stall, steel, overhead garage door. Fenestration on the northwest elevation of the front porch consists of three one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over-one, screen windows. Fenestration on the first story of the original house, from southwest to northeast, consists of three one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers; and one vinyl casement window with faux dividers. Fenestration on the first story of the 1987 addition consists of three vinyl casement windows with faux dividers. There is no fenestration on the 2010 addition. Fenestration on the second story of the original house consists of a one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl window with faux dividers; and two vinyl casement windows with faux dividers. Fenestration on the third story of the tower projection consists of one vinyl casement window with faux dividers. The third story of the tower on the northwest elevation features a vinyl casement window with faux dividers on the southwest elevation; a vinyl awning window with faux dividers on the southeast elevation; two vinyl casement windows with faux dividers on the northeast elevation, and a vinyl casement window with faux dividers on the northwest elevation. Integrity The house retains excellent integrity of location as it remains in its original location in the South Hill neighborhood. The house also retains excellent integrity of setting as it remains surrounded by the Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 4 original houses that predate its construction, and is sited overlooking the St. Croix River valley (Washington County 2019). The integrity of design, materials, and workmanship have been compromised by several alterations and additions over time, including replacement siding in 1987 that is not in-kind; alterations to slightly reduce the size of the front, second-story windows in the 1990s; replacement windows throughout and new octagonal windows on the southeast elevation in the 1990s; the enclosure of the front porch in the 1990s; the bay window addition on the southeast elevation in 1996; the rear additions in 1987 and 2010; and the replacement and relocation of the original chimney in 2013-2015 (City of Stillwater 1987a; City of Stillwater 1987b; City of Stillwater 1996; City of Stillwater 1910; Google 2013; Microsoft 2015; Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). The house retains fair integrity of feeling and association as many of its nineteenth century characteristics have been obscured by alterations. Overall, the house retains poor integrity due to the significant alterations. Narrative Statement of Significance History South Hill Neighborhood This property was platted in 1848 as part of the Original Town of Stillwater, although the neighborhood was not settled immediately. The South Hill neighborhood is bounded by Myrtle Street to the north, Main Street to the east, Willard Street to the south, and Sixth Street South to the west. The oldest houses in the neighborhood are located in the north end (Roberts 1996:1, 25). Broadway Street South was not included on the 1884 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps; however, numerous houses were already built by this time in the South Hill neighborhood. In fact, 26 properties in this neighborhood were built by 1870, an additional 27 were built by 1875, and 11 were built by 1879 (Roberts 1996:23). The landscape and architectural design of the South Hill neighborhood reflects the picturesque aesthetic that became popular in the 1870s and 1880s (Roberts 1996:30). This area was generally settled by businessmen who worked at the south end of Stillwater as well as professionals, government employees, elected officials, and local tradesmen (Roberts 1996:30-33). Residences in the South Hill neighborhood exhibit a variety of popular styles from the 1880s, including Italianate, French Second Empire, and Queen Anne (Roberts 1996:40). This property is an example of the nineteenth century vernacular architecture of Stillwater. Vernacular houses built from 1845-1910 featured the following characteristics: one-and-a-half-story height; gabled roofs with wood shingles; rectangular plans with porches are later additions to increase living space; minimal ornament, two-over-two, double- hung windows, vertically proportioned; and a central chimney (Stillwater HPC 2013:7, 12). Some houses in the South Hill neighborhood also features limestone retaining walls and limestone foundations, as in this house at 615 Broadway Street South (Roberts 1996:40). After 1910, concrete block became more commonly used for foundations and retaining walls. Most of the early homes in this area were built with wood frames and siding. Wood shingles were also commonly used on roofs prior to 1900, before transitioning to asphalt or asbestos shingles (Stillwater HPC 2013:4). Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 5 Property History No original building permits for this property were on file at the City of Stillwater. Tract records on file at the Washington County Courthouse indicate that the land on which this house is sited was deeded to Nels Hanson in 1879 (Washington County Courthouse n.d.). According to Washington County records, the house was built in 1880 (Washington County 2019). The original architect or builder is not known. The property is first depicted on a Sanborn Fire Insurance Map in 1898. It included a two-story, wood frame dwelling with a shingle roof, an open one-story porch on the southwest-facing façade, and a one-story, rectangular wing at the rear that extended slightly beyond the two-story portion of the house. A one-and- a-half-story carriage house was located to the northeast of the house (Sanborn Map Company 1898). By 1910, the rear one-story wing was replaced with a square-shaped addition, slightly shorter than the width of the two-story portion, and it had an open one-story porch on the southeast elevation of the wing. Additionally, a one-story outbuilding was built to the southeast of the house (Sanborn Map Company 1910). In 1920, a building permit was issued for new shingles and general repairs (City of Stillwater 1920). The one-story outbuilding was removed by 1924 (Sanborn Map Company 1924). The carriage house was removed between 1949 and 1966 (NETR 1949; NETR 1966). The porch and part of the house were re-roofed in 1972 (City of Stillwater 1972). In 1981, a 12-foot by 21-foot deck was constructed on the rear of the house (City of Stillwater 1981). This deck is likely no longer extant due to later changes to the rear of the house. In 1987, a 24-foot by 24-foot garage and a second-story addition were constructed; this likely refers to the rear addition that is comprised of a basement-level garage and first-story addition (City of Stillwater 1987a). It may also include the construction of the tower projection, but this element is not described on available building permits. The previous square-shaped addition at the rear of the house was likely removed prior to the construction of the 1987 addition as the footprints do not match. Also in 1987, the house was re-sided with vinyl siding (City of Stillwater 1987b). According to the property owner, there were several changes to the house in the 1990s. On the southwest-facing façade, the porch was fully enclosed, the porch roof was altered, and the second-story windows were replaced and resized from the original fenestration. The roofline on the northwest elevation was altered to accommodate a second-story window in the southwest half. The octagonal windows on the southeast elevation were also installed during this period (Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). The one-story, bay window addition on the southeast elevation was built in 1996, possibly in conjunction with the other changes in the 1990s (City of Stillwater 1996). In 2010, an 8-foot by 12-foot garage addition with a screened porch above was constructed on the rear of the house, as an addition to the 1987 addition. This 2010 addition included a third garage stall and extension of the existing screened porch above the second garage stall, built in 1987 (City of Stillwater 2010). As of 2013, the house’s chimney was brick and located on the ridgeline; this was likely the original chimney. It was replaced by a concrete block chimney located near the south corner of the original house between 2013-2015 (Google 2013; Microsoft 2015). In 2015, the roof shingles were replaced (City of Stillwater 2015). Due to dense tree cover, historical aerial photographs do not provide additional detail about the construction date of the tower on the northwest elevation or the pergola on the southeast elevation. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 6 Occupant History Nels Hanson lived on Broadway Street South since at least 1880 along with his wife, (Eva) Christeen, and their children, Louis (Edward), Mary, Ida, and Albert (U.S. Census Bureau 1880). Hanson was first listed at 615 Broadway Street South in the 1887 city directory (Barrett 1887:129). Hanson owned a meat market (Hanson & Co., later Hanson Meat Co.) at 234 Main Street South and later 306 Main Street South and 210 Main Street South, all of which appear to remain extant (Barrett 1887:129; Davison and Moore 1882:203; R.L. Polk & Co. 1904:124). The house was presumably built for Hanson, based on tract records at the Washington County Courthouse; however, original building permits are not on file at the City of Stillwater. Hanson moved to Stillwater in 1865 and opened his meat market in 1875. As of 1882, four individuals are listed in the city directory as employees of Hanson & Co. Hanson Meat Co. was one of five meat markets in Stillwater as of 1882, along with Kirchof & Weisel (later Fulton Meat Market), O’Neal Bros., Severance & Stone, and Isaac Staples (Davison and Moore 1882:203). Both Hanson and Staples independently owned several commercial blocks in Downtown Stillwater. Staples had arrived in the St. Croix River Valley in 1853 and organized a lumber company the following year, which became very successful. Staples’ meat market was open in Stillwater by 1871. The oldest butcher in Stillwater was John Illingworth, who began his career in 1855 (Neill 1881:579; The Saint Paul Globe, 28 June 1898:3; The Saint Paul Globe, 14 October 1898:8). By 1890, Hanson lived next door at 609 Broadway Street South. Martin M. Eldred, Benjamin S. Miller, and Elizabeth Miller (a dressmaker) were listed as residents at 615 Broadway Street South, which suggests that the property was occupied by boarders (R.L. Polk & Co. 1890:107, 131, 191). In 1892, John B. Hardy, a collector for F.J.R. Aiple resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1892:142). In 1894, Christian C. Behrens, a bookkeeper for F.J.R. Aiple resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1894:53). In 1896, Albert Bussiere, a bookkeeper for J.J. Eichten resided at this address, and Alma Ponath was a domestic servant for this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1896:69, 211). According to the 1898 and 1900 city directories, Oscar A. Darbush (or A. Oscar Garbucsh), a clerk at Stillwater Hardware Co., resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1898:97; R.L. Polk & Co. 1900:113). However, the 1900 census indicates that John Corrigan, a foreman in a shoe shop, lived at the address with his wife, Sarah, their son, Charles, and Mary Luken, a domestic servant (U.S. Census Bureau 1900). By 1902, Louis E. Hanson (son of Nels Hanson) resided at this address and was a cutter at his father’s meat market (R.L. Polk & Co. 1902:125). By 1910, Louis was associated with his parents’ house at 609 Broadway Street South and Elmer, Mary, and Dorothy Reese rented 615 Broadway Street South (R.L. Polk & Co. 1910:112; U.S. Census Bureau 1910). In 1912, Frank F. Johnson, a travel agent, resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1912:110). Johnson rented this house until at least 1920, along with his wife, Mary, and their daughters, Mary and Jeanette (U.S. Census Bureau 1920). Louis (Edward) Hanson was the owner at the time, according to a historical building permit (City of Stillwater 1920). By 1927, Louis’ son, Howard, resided at the address and worked as a bookkeeper for Hanson Meat Co. (R.L. Polk & Co. 1927:65). Howard lived there with his wife, Margaret, and their children, Howard and Mary (U.S. Census Bureau 1930). Howard remained at 615 Broadway Street South into the 1940s, but by 1945, he was associated with 609 Broadway Street South. Earl Jones, an optometrist, resided at 615 Broadway Street South with his wife, Helen (R.L. Polk & Co. 1945:52, 62, 146). In 1948, George A. Sorenson lived at this address with his wife, Clara; George was employed at Grand Café and later the state prison in Bayport (R.L. Polk & Co. 1948:110, 147; R.L. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 7 Polk & Co. 1951:112; R.L. Polk & Co. 1954:108). Sorenson remained at this address through 1977 (City of Stillwater 1972; R.L. Polk & Co. 1977:38). In 1978, Terrence (Terry) and Sally Zoller resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1978:285). Sally worked as an appraiser for the County Assessor and Terry worked for the Minnesota Department of Transportation (R.L. Polk & Co. 1980:311; R.L. Polk & Co. 1985:325). The Zollers remained the owners until December 2018 when the home was purchased by Julie and Reid Miller (Edina Realty Title Inc. 2018). A “Stillwater Historic Homes Tour” brochure suggests that this house was built in 1870 and that Bing Crosby’s mother was born here; however, a biography about Bing Crosby indicates that his mother, Catherine Harrigan, was born in a boarding room above an old creamery, and lived in a large boardinghouse on Main Street in Stillwater and a house on Second Street before leaving the area (Giddins 2001; Rivertown Restoration 1984). Therefore, it appears that any association with Catherine Harrigan is incorrect. Significance This property was previously surveyed as part of an intensive National Register survey of the South Hill Stillwater Residential Area, which recommended a potential historic district in the west side of the South Hill neighborhood. Due to this property’s location in the east side of the South Hill neighborhood, it was not identified as potentially contributing to this potential historic district (Roberts 1996). Additionally, during this intensive National Register survey, this house was recommended not preliminarily eligible for listing in the NRHP (Zahn and Roberts 1996). This property was evaluated for local significance within the following historic context: “Development of Residential Neighborhoods in Stillwater, 1850-1940; Historical Context of the South Hill, 1850s-1940s” (Roberts 1996). According to Stillwater City Code, Section 22-7, Subd. 4, this property was evaluated for local significance under the following Heritage Preservation Site criteria: 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Stillwater, State of Minnesota, or the United States. This property does not stand out within the history or development of Stillwater, the South Hill neighborhood, Minnesota, or the United States. Residential development began in Stillwater in the 1850s and approximately 50 residences were built in the South Hill neighborhood prior to the construction of this property in 1880. The house directly southeast at 623 Broadway Street South was built in 1875, the house directly northwest at 609 Broadway Street South was built in 1876, a house across the street and to the southwest at 604 Broadway Street South was built in 1875, and two other properties on this block of Broadway Street South between Locust Street East and Walnut Street East were built in 1870 at 603 and 620 Broadway Street South (Washington County 2019). It is also not a distinctive example of architecture within the South Hill neighborhood, which is known to exhibit a variety of popular architectural styles from the 1880s including Italianate, French Second Empire, and Queen Anne. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #1. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 8 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event. According to local histories, this property is not known to have been the site of a significant historic event. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #2. 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. The earliest known owner was Nels Hanson, a butcher and owner of Hanson Meat Co., who resided at this house in 1880 and remained for about 10 years before moving into the property next door at 609 Broadway Street South. Hanson was one of several meat market proprietors and commercial block owners in Stillwater in the 1880s and 1890s. However, his contributions within the commercial history and development of Stillwater do not appear to have gone above and beyond the contributions of other similar businessmen in Stillwater at the same time. The house was a rental property from 1890 to 1902, at which point Hanson’s son Louis resided here, who also worked at Hanson Meat Co. By 1910, Louis moved to the property next door at 609 Broadway Street South. It was again a rental property 1927 when Louis’ son Howard resided here. By 1945, Howard moved to the property next door at 609 Broadway Street South. George A. Sorenson resided here from 1948-1977, followed by Terence and Sally Zoller from 1978-2018, and Julie and Reid Miller starting in 2018. Although some of the occupants had significant tenures at this property, none of these individuals are known to be significant within the history, culture, or development of the City of Stillwater. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #3. 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment. This property retains some characteristics of the nineteenth century vernacular house style in Stillwater including its one-and-a-half-story height, gabled roof, minimal ornament, and vertically proportioned windows. However, the property has lost several characteristics of this architectural style due to later additions and alterations, including the enclosure of the porch; replacement of the original wood siding and wood shingles not-in kind; the replacement of original windows not in-kind; obstruction of the rectangular plan due to additions to the rear and southeast elevations; and removal of the central chimney. Therefore, this property does not retain sufficient distinguishing characteristics of nineteenth century vernacular houses to be exemplary of the style. Although the porch exhibits some characteristics of the Colonial Revival style, the rest of the house does not and there is no physical or historical evidence to indicate that the house was originally designed in the Colonial Revival style. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #4. 5. Its identification as work of an architectural or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City of Stillwater. The architect and builder of this property are not known. Therefore, this property is not an example of the work of a master and accordingly, this property is not eligible under Criterion #5. 6. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. This property’s vernacular form by its nature does not exhibit significant elements of architectural design or detail, and therefore, it does not represent a significant architectural innovation. In addition, most of its Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 9 exterior materials have been replaced over time. The primary original materials that remain are the limestone foundation and the wood framing of the front porch. Therefore, this property does not represent significant use of materials or craftsmanship. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #6. 7. Its unique location, scale or other physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, a district, the community, or the City of Stillwater. The scale of this property and its general physical characteristics do not stand out within the scale and physical characteristics of the South Hill neighborhood. However, this property does retain its original limestone foundation and features a limestone retaining wall parallel to the sidewalk and the driveway. These elements are indicative of older building stock and building element found in the South Hill neighborhood. Only this property and the property to the southeast at 623 Broadway Street South feature these walls. It is not known if the walls were removed elsewhere on the block; however, the existing topography suggests that such walls were not necessary in other nearby properties. There are other examples of limestone foundations and retaining walls in the South Hill neighborhood and they are considered more prominent attributes in the North Hill neighborhood, by comparison (Roberts 1995:46); Roberts 1996:40). As such, the limestone walls and foundation of this property do not represent a distinctive visual feature among the properties in the South Hill neighborhood or the City of Stillwater. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #7. Recommendation Because the Nels Hanson House does not meet any of the local Heritage Preservation Site criteria as an individual property, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 10 Bibliography Barrett, E.F. 1887 Stillwater City Directory. E.F.Barrett, Stillwater, Minnesota. City of Stillwater 1920 Building Permit #1782. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1972 Building Permit #2452. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1981 Building Permit #5494. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1987a Building Permit #7753. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1987b Building Permit #7885. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1996 Building Permit #12169. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2010 Building Permit #2010-00215. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2015 Building Permit #2015-00187. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. Davison, C. Wright, and Anson J. Moore 1882 Stillwater City Directory for 1882-83. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, Printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Edina Realty Title Inc. 2018 Warranty Deed e-CRV No. 907968. On file at Washington County Government Center, Stillwater, Minnesota. Giddins, Gary 2001 Bing Crosby: A Pocketful of Dreams. The Early Year 1903-1940. Electronic document, https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/g/giddins-crosby.html, accessed May 14, 2019. Google 2013 Street View. Electronic document, http://maps.google.com, accessed May 14, 2019. Microsoft 2015 Streetside View. Electronic document, https://www.bing.com/maps, accessed May 14, 2019. National Environmental Title Research, LLC [NETR] Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 11 1949 Historical Aerial Photograph, Washington County, Minnesota. Electronic document, http://historicaerials.com/, accessed May 14, 2019. 1966 Historical Aerial Photograph, Washington County, Minnesota. Electronic document, http://historicaerials.com/, accessed May 14, 2019. Neill, Edward D. 1881 History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley. North Star Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota. R.L. Polk & Co. 1890 Stillwater City Directory 1890-91. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1892 Stillwater City Directory 1892-93. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1894 Stillwater City Directory 1894-95. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1896 Stillwater City Directory 1896-97. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1898 Stillwater City Directory 1898-99. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1900 Stillwater City Directory 1900-01. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1902 Stillwater City Directory 1902-03. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1904 Stillwater City Directory 1904-05. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1910 Stillwater City Directory 1910-11. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1912 Stillwater City Directory 1912-1913. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1927 Stillwater City Directory 1927-1928. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1945 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1945. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1948 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1948. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1951 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1951. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 12 1954 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1954. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1977 1977 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. 1978 1978 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. 1980 1980 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. 1985 1985 Stillwater Minnesota City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. Rivertown Restoration 1984 “Stillwater Historic Homes Tour” brochure. On file at the Stillwater Public Library, Stillwater, Minnesota. Roberts, Norene 1995 North Hill (Original Town) Stillwater Residential Area, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. Prepared for the City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. 1996 Final Survey Report for the South Hill Stillwater Residential Area, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. Prepared for the City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Saint Paul Globe, The [Saint Paul, Minnesota] 1898 “Isaac Staples Dead.” 28 June:3. St. Paul, Minnesota. 1903 “Stillwater.” 14 October:8. St. Paul, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company 1898 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. 1910 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. 1924 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission [Stillwater HPC] 2013 Stillwater, Minnesota: Preserving Historic Neighborhoods. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 13 U.S. Census Bureau 1880 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1900 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1910 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1920 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1930 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1940 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. Washington County 2019 Property Viewer. Electronic document, http://maps.co.washington.mn.us/propertyviewer/, accessed May 13, 2019. Washington County Courthouse n.d. Stillwater tract book. On file at the Washington County Courthouse, Stillwater, Minnesota. Zahn, Thomas R., and Norene Roberts 1996 City of Stillwater Architectural-History Inventory Form: WA-SWC-024. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 14 Photographs Figure 1. House, Facing East-Northeast Figure 2. House, Facing East Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 15 Figure 3. House, Facing Northeast Figure 4. House, Facing Northeast Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 16 Figure 5. House, Southeast Elevation, Facing Northeast Figure 6. House, Northeast Elevation, Facing Southwest (HPC Staff Report: Case No. 2019-03, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, March 20, 2019) Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 17 Figure 7. House, Northwest Elevation, Facing East WA-SWC-024 Map 1 Nels Hanson House 615 Broadway Street South Stillwater, Minnesota E Walnut StE Walnut St E Locust StE Locust StBroadway S t SBroadway S t S ¬«36 Map Produced by 106 Group 5/14/2019Source: 106 Group; MnDOT; Washington County 0 30 Meters 0 80 Feet [1:1,500 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia,© OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community ^_ WA-SWC-024 Inventoried Property *Property boundary based on Washington County 2018 Parcel data G OL w /\~fTOHNEYS f!--: /-\DVOCATES July 1, 2019 Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Heritage Preservation Commission Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 City Council of the City of Stillwater Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: The Demolition Permit Application, Demolition Designation Study, and proposed Designation of a Heritage Preservation Site concerning the real property located at 615 Broadway Street South, Stillwater, Min nesota (the "Property'~ . . Mayor Kozlowski, Honorable Councilors, and Honorable Commissioners, Please be advised that I am an attorney and that I ~epresent Reid and Julie Miller in this matter. On February 22, 2019, my clients applied for a demolition permit from the Heritage Preservation Commission ("HPC"). On April 3, 2019, the HPC found that the Property was a historic resource and did not immediately approve the application for a demolition permit. On April 16, 2019, the C_ity Council ordered the preparation of a designation study to determine if the Property should be designated as a historic preservation site. Based on the Council's decision, the City's chosen expert performed an evaluation of the Property to determine if it should be designated as a historic preservation site. The expert's evaluation applied the criteria found in the City Code at section 22-7, subdivision 4: a., The character, interest or value as part of the development heritage or cultural characteristics of the city, state or county. b. The location as a site of a significant historic event. c. The identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the city's culture and development. d. The embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment. e. The identification as work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the city's development. f. The embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship that represent a significant architectural innovation. MAIN O rn cE 8t fv1A1L11 % :-\DD REss : 4770 W HITE BrnR PA RKWAY O WHITE B EAR LAKE, ~JN .5511 0 iJLYIVIOUTH LO CATI O N: 3020 HARBOR LN,JE [\]ORTH,# 103, F'LYIVI OU TH, fVi~J 55447 l0 ELEPI-IOf~E : 65 'J -426-32.49 ° Fl'.CS IIVI IL E: fJS'l -426-9501 WWW.G DOL AW.COM Pa~e 12 g. The unique location or singular physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. The Demolition Designation Study was submitted to the City on May 24, 2019. The City's chosen expert reached the conclusion that the Property does not meet any one of the seven possible criteria for listing as a historic preservation site. Nevertheless, the City Council voted, by a 2-1 vote to "reject" the Demolition Designation Study and referred this matter to back to the HPC to reevaluate if this Property should be designated as a historic preservation site . . After the City Council's rejection of the study, the City Code contemplates that the Planning Commission and State Historic Preservation Office will consult the HPC. The HPC will then hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council as to whether or not the City should locally designate the structure. The City Council would then hold another public hearing and make a final decision. Each of the upcoming public hearings would require public notice and the additional investment of City resources. Moreover, the t:ity Code also requires the HPC to make recommendations concerning a "proposed program for site preservation" -yet another investment of City resources. My understanding is that the relevant sections of the City Code have been infrequently invoked and not amended for many years. I write primarily to make the City aware that state statute, together with a 2013 decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court, requires the City to issue the demolition permit that my clients applied for. Considering the involved and costly procedures required by the City Code going forward, and the lack of any evidence to support designating the Property as a historic preservation site, the City Council should simply reconsider its prior decision and vote to accept the Demolition Designation Study and issue a demolition permit. Cities must approve or deny a "written request relating to zoning" within 60 days of the application. Minn. Stat.§ 15.99, sudb. 2(a). If a city does not act within the 60-day deadline, the application is automatically approved. Id. Heritage preservation proceedings fit within the definition of a "written request relating to zoning." 500; LLC v. City of Minneapolis, 837 N.W.2d 287, 292 (Minn. 2013 ). Thus, my clients' demolition permit application is automatically approved unless it was denied within 60 days of February 22, 2019. More than four months have passed since the application was submitted to the City and there has been no final decision on my clients' application. The 60-day "clock" does not stop until a final decision has been made. Moreno v. City of Minneapolis, 676 N.W.2d 1, 5-6 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). Under the applicable provision of the City Code, section 34-4, subdivision 2(2)(b)(iii)(l), the application is still pending a final decision. The demolition permit would still be approved if "the completed designation study is not approved within 180 days of the commission determination" or "if the city council denies implementation of the designation study." Under the tenns of the City Code, the City Council could still approve my client's application-no final decision has been made. I realize that the City does not need a letter from me to explain the law. The City has an excellent city attorney to tum to in the event they have any legal questions. However, my clients and I felt it was important to make the City aware of this legal authority be.fore significant public resources Page 13 are expended in the futile pursuit of designating the Property as a historic site. The demolition permit has already been approved by operation of Minn. Stat.§ 15.99. Mayor Kozlowski and Councilmember Weidner were not present for the vote rejecting the Demolition Designation Study. It would seem that the most efficient way to address this issue would be for the City Council to reconsider its rejection of the Demolition Designation Study at the next meeting of the City Council and vote to accept the study and issue the permit. I respectfully request that Mayor Kozlowski and Councilmember Weidner move to put this matter on the agenda for the City Council meeting of July 2, 2019. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Peter J. Frank Attorney at Law cc: Reid and Julie Miller Korine Land, Esq., City Attorney rn, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE July 23, 2019 Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner City of Stillwater 216 4th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: Local designation of the Nels Hanson House, 615 Broadway St. South, SHPO File Number 2019-1960 Dear Ms. Wittman, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced designation. It has been reviewed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §471.193, subd . 5., and Sec.22-7, Subd. 414) of Stillwater's Code of Ordinances. Constructed in 1880, the Nels Hanson House is a two-story, wood frame, vinyl-clad dwelling with a gable roof and a full width, one-story enclosed front porch. Fenestration consists of a mixture of wood double hung sash windows, aluminum and vinyl double hung sash, and aluminum and vinyl fixed windows. The house has undergone several alterations: a one-story, full width rear addition in 1987; a one-story bay window addition in 1996; a one-story addition on the northeast elevation in 2010; a concrete block chimney in 2013-2015; and a wood deck at an undetermined date. The Hanson House is an example of a vernacular dwelling that has grown and been altered over time by · numerous owners. Unfortunately, these alterations have compromised the overall integrity of the house. The house was built for and originally occupied by Nels Hanson, the owner of Hanson Meat Market in downtown Stillwater. Research indicates that Mr. Hanson does not stand out as historically significant among early residents and business owners in Stillwater's history. For these reasons we do not find that the Hanson House exhibits the qualities necessary to qualify for local designation under any of the criteria listed in Stillwater's preservation ordinance. If you have any questions regarding our assessment of this property, please contact me at 651.201.3291 or michael.koop@state.m n.us. Sincerely, State Historic Preservation Office cc: Amy Mino, Stillwater HPC Chair MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue I Administration Building 203 I Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 I 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo/ 1 mnshpo(.@state.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND SERVICE PROVIDER Abbi Wittman From: Sent: To: Subject: Abbi, Tuesday, August 13, 2019 5:14 PM Abbi Wittman Miller home on South Broadway We would like to express our support of the Miller's right to build a new home on their property at 615 Broadway St. S. We believe the new home will enhance our neighborhood and Stillwater as a whole. Peter and Susan Boosalis 515 Broadway St. S. Sent from my iPhone 1 Received Community Development Department August 13, 2019 Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Heritage Preservation Commission Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 City Council of the City of Stillwater Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Community Development Department Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: The Demolition Permit Application, Demolition Designation Study, and proposed Designation of a Heritage Preservation Site concerning the real property located at 615 Broadway Street South, Stillwater, Minnesota (the "Property'~. Mayor Kozlowski, Honorable Councilors, and Honorable Commissioners, As you know, I represent Reid and Julie Miller in this matter. On August 21, 2019 and September 3, 2019, the Heritage Preservation Commission ("HPC") and the City Council respectively will consider designating the Property as a heritage preservation site. I respectfully submit this letter to urge the HPC to determine that the Property is not eligible for designation and to urge the City Council to decline to designate the Property and order the issuance of a demolition permit. On February 22, 2019, my clients applied for a demolition permit from the HPC. On April 3, 2019, the HPC found that the Property was a historic resource and did not immediately approve the application for a demolition permit. On April 16, 2019, the City Council ordered the preparation of a designation study to determine if the Property should be designated as a historic preservation site. Based on the Council's decision, the City's chosen expert performed an evaluation of the Property to determine if it should be designated as a historic preservation site. The expert's evaluation applied the criteria found in the City Code at section 22-7, subdivision 4: a. The character, interest or value as part of the development heritage or cultural characteristics of the city, state or county. b. The location as a site of a significant historic event. c. The identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the city's culture and development. MAIN Omu:: & MAILINC ADDRESS: 4770 Wc11n BEAR PARl<WAY ·WHITEBEAR LAl<E, MN 55110 PLYMOUTH LocATION: 3020 HA1mori LANC No1nH, #103, PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 rmPHONE: 651-426-3249 • FACSIMILE: 651-426-9501 WWW.CDOLAW.COM Page 12 d. The embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment. e. The identification as work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the city's development. f. The embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship that represent a significant architectural innovation. g. The unique location or singular physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, community or the city. The City's chosen expert reached the conclusion that the Property does not meet any one of the seven possible criteria for listing as a historic preservation site. At the July 2, 2019 City Council meeting, statements were made indicating that the Demolition Designation Study in this matter considered national criteria instead of the seven-factor criteria in the Stillwater City Code. Those statements were mistaken. The report submitted to the City, on the City's form, by the City's own expert, analyzing the criteria chosen by the City, found that there was no basis for local designation-not a single one of the seven criteria was fulfilled. Nevertheless, the City Council voted to reject the conclusions of the Demolition Designation Study and referred this matter to back to the HPC to reevaluate if this Property should be designated as a historic preservation site. Subsequent to the City Council's rejection of the study, the Planning Commission and State Historic Preservation Office consulted with the HPC to provide their recommendations concerning local designation. As of the date of this letter, both the Planning Commission and the State Historic Preservation Office have strongly recommended against local designation. The Planning Commission recommended against designation upon a unanimous 4-0 vote at the July 24, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. There is a simple reason that the Planning Commission, the experts at the State Historic Preservation Office, and the City of Stillwater's own experts and staff are all recommending against local designation: there is no factual or legal basis in the record to support designating the Property as a heritage preservation site. The City should not, and must not, take an action that is unsupported by the facts and by its own ordinances. Finally, pursuant to section 22-7, subdivision 4(6) of the City Code, if the HPC recommends local designation it must also provide the City Council with a "proposed program for site preservation." There are many wonderful and beautiful historic sites within the City of Stillwater. To the extent that the City has resources to expend on historic preservation, those resources should go to sites which meet the City's criteria for a historic site. The Property is not one of those places .. It would be wasteful to expend the City's limited resources on preserving a structure that is mostly the product of the 1980s and 90s. My clients do not waive their argument that their demolition permit has already been approved by operation of Minn. Stat. § 15.99. They remain hopeful that the HPC and the City Council will ultimately reach the correct conclusion based on the merits of their request for a demolition permit. Page 13 Again, I realize that the City does not need a letter from me to explain the law. I respectfully offer this letter to assist the HPC and the City Council in the process of reaching reasonable decisions consistent with the terms of the City Code. Thank you for your time and your attention to this letter. Sincerely, GDOLAW Attorney at Law cc: Reid and Julie Miller Korine Land, Esq., City Attorney CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DENYING THE LOCAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION SITE DESIGNATION FOR THE HISTORIC RESOURCE AT 615 BROADWAY STREET SOUTH HPC CASE NO. 2019-19 WHEREAS, Reid and Julie Miller requested an application for approval of a demolition permit for the residence located at 615 Broadway Street South; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 2019 the Heritage Preservation Commission denied the demolition permit, citing the structure was a historic resource and worthy of designation as a local heritage preservation site; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2019 the City Council upheld the decision of the Heritage Preservation Commission and ordered the preparation of a designation study; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2019 the City Council rejected the findings of the designation study, beginning the process of local designation; and WHEREAS, on July 24, 2019 the Planning Commission reviewed the local nomination and recommended the designation not occur; and WHEREAS, August 21, 2019 the Heritage Preservation Commission held a public hearing and determined the historic resource was not eligible to be designated as a local heritage preservation site; and WHEREAS, on September 3, 2019 the City Council held a public hearing regarding the local heritage preservation site designation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, finds that the historic resource is not eligible to be locally designated as a heritage preservation site. BE IT FUTHERED RESOLVED, that the Council denies the local heritage preservation site designation. Page 2 of 2 BE IT FUTHERED RESOLVED, that the Council hereby approves the demolition of the residence located 615 Broadway Street South. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota this 3rd day of September, 2019. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk PLANNING REPORT TO: Mayor & Council Members REPORT DATE: August 27, 2019 MEETING DATE: September 3, 2019 REQUEST: Approve MOU associated with concurrent detachment/annexation of properties along Stillwater/Oak Park Heights municipal boundary REPORT BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION Canvas Health approached the City of Stillwater about a future plan to redevelop their property on the south side of Orleans Street between Panama Avenue and Ozark Avenue. As it turns out, the property lies partly within Stillwater and partly within Oak Park Heights. So, Canvas Health has asked whether their whole property could be located within Stillwater. This would require the detachment of the area shown below in red-cross hatch from Oak Park Heights and annexation to Stillwater. Page 2 Oak Park Heights supports the detachment request if the City of Stillwater is willing to concurrently detach the right-of-way property that Lookout Drive traverses. This is important to Oak Park Heights primarily because it provides direct access to Highway 95 from one of its neighborhoods. The four parcels that they would like to have detached from Stillwater are shown in light blue to the right. In addition, the final parcel of the campus for the Washing County Government Center has been purchased. As with the rest of the campus, Oak Park Heights agreed that it would be annexed to the City of Stillwater. That will be done at this time as well. The location of this parcel is seen in the graphic below. Page 3 SPECIFIC REQUEST City staff is requesting the Stillwater City Council to consider and approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding that is related to the concurrent detachment-annexation actions described above. COMMENTS 1. The Stillwater City Council conceptually approved of the concurrent detachment/annexation on Jul 2, 2019. 2. Stillwater’s responsibility to maintain the MnDOT constructed trail along Lookout Trail will transfer to Oak Park Heights with the detachment. 3. Sanitary sewer and municipal water for Canvas Health’s redevelopment will be provided by Oak Park Heights. 4. Oak Park Heights would like to see no access to Ozark Avenue from Canvas Health’s redeveloped property. They would also like to see robust landscaping for screening purposes along Ozark Avenue. COUNCIL ACTION If the City Council approves of the actions and its associated MOU, the Council could adopt the attached resolution. Attachments: MOU Resolution bt August 27, 2019 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Concurrent Detachment and Annexation Cities of Oak Park Heights and Stillwater The Cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights have a mutual interest in the detachment and annexation of certain lands which provides reasonable benefits to each city. The following terms outline commitments and timelines upon which both parties can rely to contemplate and complete such transfers in a timely fashion. The Parties Agree as Follows: 1. The City of Stillwater will detach parcels/lands listed or shown in Exhibit A for concurrent annexation into Oak Park Heights. The City of Oak Park Heights will detach parcels/lands listed or shown in Exhibit B for concurrent annexation into Stillwater. 2. Pursuant to the Oct. 4th, 2005 Washington County Government Center Agreement - Sec. III, Part 6, Oak Park Heights will also detach the parcel shown in Exhibit C for concurrent annexation into Stillwater. The PID for this parcel is #3403020330106. 3. The City of Stillwater commits and warrants to Oak Park Heights that should any redevelopment, expansion or change of use be sought upon lands lying east of Ozark Ave, West of Panama Ave and South of Orleans Street the parties agree that: a. INGRESS or EGRESS access may remain from Ozark to serve existing residence at 14951 65th Street. b. At such time as the property at 14951 65th Street and/or upon directly adjacent lands lying west of Panama Ave and south of Orleans St. is sought for expansion or redevelopment, all access to Ozark Ave shall be removed and substantial berms and/or other landscaping shall be installed to prevent alteration and access. Landscaping, including for example low berms, evergreen trees and other traditional screening shall be installed along the westerly side so as to provide further visual buffers to the residential areas. c. At the time of redevelopment (or any replacement of fixtures) all building and site lighting shall and compliant with both cities lighting regulations – whichever is more restrictive, including the use of “full- cut off” lighting. d. There shall remain a minimum 30’ buffer from the eastern ROW line of Ozark Ave and no development may occur in in this area – (See Exhibit B) and shall remain as a wooded / natural area. This area also contains a stormwater basin that serves both OPH and STW and which shall not be altered without further written agreements. The eastwardly limits of this buffer area is approximately 60’ from the center line of the Ozark Ave roadway. e. Any storm water improvements from the Ozark and 64th Street drainage district shall be cost shared between both Cities based on the contributing drainage area from each respective City. 4. The City of Oak Park Heights commits and warrants to Stillwater that all lands transferred into Oak Park Heights shall remain in public ownership and that the City of Stillwater is not responsible for any further site maintenance of these parcels. 5. The City of Oak Park Heights shall assume all maintenance of the trail-way located along the eastern side of Lookout Trail relieving Stillwater of this specific obligation that may be found in the MOU Agreement dated 9/8/06, Part 8. Sec. e and/or its subsequent Agreements being MNDOT Contract No. 01433 and MnDOT Contract No. 04958. The August 27, 2019 City of Oak Park Heights shall work with Stillwater to initiate any necessary amendments with MNDOT regarding these agreements. These Agreements are incorporated by reference. In all cases, except for this specific trail area along Lookout Trail all other responsibilities found the Agreements remain with the City of Stillwater. 6. Subject to the approval of the Oak Park Heights City Engineer, the City of Oak Park Heights shall provide access to its sanitary, storm and water systems for any further redevelopment of the properties located at 6450 Panama Avenue, 375 Orleans St East and 14951 65th St, but such access shall be consistent with other policies and regulations that are in effect in Oak Park Heights. Any access to Oak Park Heights utility systems shall be subject to the review and approval of the Oak Park Heights City Engineer, but may not be unreasonably conditioned, withheld or delayed. The Developer of such lands shall be responsible to cover any Oak Park Heights costs, fees or permits typically required under Oak Park Heights regulations should access be sought. 7. There are no supplemental payments, transfer of taxation capacity or special assessment privileges provided for in this MOU. 8. The Public Works Department for both Cities agree to meet and discuss routine maintenance responsibilities of Ozark and 64th,Streets including street sweeping, pot hole patching and snow and ice control. Street rehabilitation or reconstruction project cost shall be split 50%/50%. 9. Oak Park Heights shall be the lead agency and shall initiate and proceed with the annexation and detachment process with the Office of Administrative Hearings. Stillwater shall cooperate with Oak Park Heights throughout the process. The Cities shall negotiate and finalize a Detachment & Annexation Resolution to be adopted by both parties. Final executed copies of the resolutions shall be attached hereto as Exhibit D. Each party will bear its own costs to complete this transaction. Each City pays half of the State filing fees or costs for the concurrent detachment/annexation. 10. It is the understanding of the Cities that all owners of the subject properties concur with the annexation/detachment proceedings and shall submit separate letters of support. CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Date Mary McComber, Mayor Date Beth Wolf, City Date Eric Johnson, City Administrator Date August 27, 2019 Exhibit A Lands to be conveyed from Stillwater to Oak Park Heights August 27, 2019 Exhibit B Lands to be conveyed from Oak Park Heights to Stillwater & Buffer Area August 27, 2019 Exhibit C Lands to be conveyed from Oak Park Heights to Stillwater – Parcel #340302330106 August 27, 2019 Exhibit D Copies of Council Resolutions. RESOLUTION 2019- RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING RELATED TO THE CONCURRENT DETACHMENT/ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS IN THE CITIES OF STILLWATER AND OAK PARK HEIGHTS WHEREAS, on July 2, 2019 the City Council of the City of Stillwater agreed in concept to the concurrent detachment/annexation of certain properties located along the shared municipal boundary with the City of Oak Park Heights and the City of Stillwater; and WHEREAS, both the City of Stillwater and the City of Oak Park Heights mutually benefit from the concurrent action; and WHEREAS, the City Councils of the respective Cities wish to identify the commitments and timelines associated with the concurrent action by means of the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Stillwater City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Memorandum of Understanding dated August 27, 2019. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. _____________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Beth Ward, City Clerk Date: September 3, 2019 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Tom McCarty, City Administrator Beth Wolf, City Clerk SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution and Order to Repair or Remove Structure at 7940 Neal Avenue North OVERVIEW: City Staff is requesting that the Council initiate an action for abating a hazardous structure at 7940 Neal Avenue North. The property owners applied for a building permit to construct a detached garage in 2015 from Stillwater Township. Later that year, this property was annexed into the City of Stillwater. The garage was started but has never been finished and has now been unprotected against the elements for several years, causing it to be in a hazardous condition. The Building Official has determined that the conditions of the structure render it unsafe due to abandonment, dilapidation, and inadequate maintenance. We recommend that the Council utilize Minn. Stat. Ch. 463 to issue an Order requiring the owners to remove the structure. The process to pursue an action against a hazardous structure is articulated in Minn. Stat. § 463.15 through Minn. Stat. § 463.251 and is as follows: 1. Building Official’s Report. The Building Official prepares a report on the status of the structure to present to the City Council, articulating the facts that make the structure or property hazardous. The statute defines “Hazardous building or hazardous property” as “any building or property, which because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical damage, unsanitary condition or abandonment, constitutes a fire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health.” (Minn. Stat. §463.15, subd. 3) The report includes pictures to support the conclusion. 2. City Council’s Order. Based on the Building Official’s report, the City Council then issues an Order requiring the owner to repair or remove the hazardous conditions or raze or remove the structure and providing a reasonable time to do so. 3. Service of the Order. Once approved by the Council, the Order is served on the owner, any tenants, and all lienholders in the same manner as a civil court action. Within 20 days, the owner or a lienholder can serve an Answer specifying any facts in dispute. 4. Default Judgment. If no Answer is served and the owner does not comply with the timeframe in the Order, the City must file the Order with the court and ask the court to enforce the Order as a default judgment. The court would hear the presentation of evidence, affirm or modify the Order, and enter a judgment. 5. Contested Cases. If an Answer is served, then the action must follow the Rules of Civil Procedure, which involves discovery, trial, and a judgment. If the City’s Order is upheld following a trial, the court would enter a judgment and fix a time after which the structure must be destroyed or repaired, or the hazardous condition removed or corrected. 6. Enforcement of Judgment. If a judgment is not complied with in the time prescribed in the Judge’s order, the City may perform the work and assess the costs as a special assessment. If the structure is razed or removed by the City, the City Council may sell any salvageable and valuable materials at public auction. The City must keep an accurate account of the expenses incurred, including filing fees, service fees, publication fees, attorney’s fees, appraiser’s fees, witness fees, including expert witness fees and traveling expenses from the time the original Order was made, and can recover it from the amount, if any, received from the sale of the salvage, after asking the court for approval. If the amount received from the sale does not equal or exceed the amount of expenses, the court shall by its judgment certify the deficiency to the City Clerk for collection. If not paid by October 1, the clerk shall assess it as a special assessment against the property. A Resolution and Order has been attached which contains the Building Official’s reports, records, photos and other relevant information. RECOMMENDATION: Review documentation and adopt the Resolution and Order to Repair or Remove Structure at 7940 Neal Avenue North. SOURCE OF FUNDS: N/A 1 CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 19- RESOLUTION AND ORDER TO REPAIR OR REMOVE STRUCTURE AT 7940 NEAL AVENUE NORTH IN STILLWATER WHEREAS, the following facts support the Order to Repair or Remove as hereinafter provided: 1. Stephen A. and Patricia J. Ogborn (“Owners”) own the property located at 7940 Neal Avenue North, Stillwater, Minnesota (the “Property”); 2. On or about January 12, 2015, Owners applied for and received a building permit (“Building Permit”) from Stillwater Township (“Township”) for the construction of an accessory structure to be located on the Property (“Structure”) (see communication from Stillwater Township Building Official Exhibit A); 3. A footing inspection was conducted on July 31, 2015 and a foundation inspection was conducted on October 9, 2015, with minimal progress (see Exhibit A); 4. The building plans submitted by the Owners are dated August 14, 2015, and clearly state the following caution: “This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent,” a warning which is repeated for every type of truss used in the project (See Building Plans Exhibit B); 5. In 2015, the Property was annexed into the City of Stillwater (“City”); 6. On May 11, 2017, the Stillwater Zoning Administrator sent a letter to the Owners informing them that the Building Permit had expired because exterior work was not completed within 180 days from issuance of the permit (see Letter Exhibit C); 7. On June 12, 2017, the Zoning Administrator sent an email clarifying the information that would be required prior to the issuance of a new building permit, including an inspection by a structural engineer (see email Exhibit D); 8. In a letter dated July 11, 2017, a structural engineer confirmed that the garage was framed and partially sheathed but noted that there was no sheathing on the roof and the trusses and wall studs had been exposed to the weather for an extended period of time. Several structural issues were identified that needed correcting (see Letter Exhibit E); 9. On or about July 27, 2017 the City issued a new Building Permit (see Building Permit Exhibit F); 10. The Building Permit notes an approval date of August 8, 2017 and an expiration date of February 4, 2018 (see Building Permit Exhibit F); 2 11. On February 13, 2018, the City sent a letter regarding the incomplete and noncompliant Structure and indicated that the Building Permit had again expired (see Letter Exhibit G); 12. On March 9, 2018, the Building Permit was reopened, with a requirement that a framing inspection was required within 30 days to keep the permit active (see Building Permit Exhibit H); 13. Since March 9, 2018, no inspections have been requested and no additional progress has been made; 14. According to the Building Official, the City has received numerous complaints from residents about kids playing at the construction site, which is located at a busy intersection with a public street and is an open and obvious danger to the public; 15. On August 7, 2019, the Building Official and Zoning Administrator inspected the Property, took photos of the incomplete Structure (see Photos Exhibit I) and documented the following deficiencies: a. Although some work had been done, the workmanship was not completed according to the approved plans; b. The wood framing and trusses were inadequately unprotected, causing obvious deterioration to the building materials due to the extended exposure to the elements; c. No progress had been made toward completion, giving the impression that project has been abandoned; d. The Owner is in violation of City Code Section 38-1 subd. 2(2)ff for having an improperly maintained or partially erected building that is not properly protected; 16. According to the Building Official, the following life, health, and safety hazards exist on the Property: a. The Structure is made of wood that has been exposed to the natural elements without adequate protection for such an extended period of time that the Structure and its supports have been compromised; b. The wood beams, trusses and plywood are fading and dilapidated, showing advanced signs of deterioration; c. The construction site has not been properly maintained or secured, and given its proximity to the public street, is a danger to the life, health and safety of the public (see Building Official Report dated August 13, 2019 Exhibit J); 3 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council that these life, health, and safety hazards be removed from the Property; WHEREAS, on September 3, 2019 at its regular Council meeting, the City Council held a hearing on this matter and considered the evidence presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the hearing and the information presented, including the aforementioned facts, the Stillwater City Council finds that the Structure and construction site on the Property constitute a hazard to the public safety, health and welfare and the Structure is a hazardous building, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 463, due to inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, and unsafe conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED by the Stillwater City Council as follows: 1. Stephen A. and Patricia J. Ogborn, husband and wife and Owners of the Property at 7940 Neal Avenue North, Stillwater, Minnesota, must complete the Structure and have it approved by the Building Official or remove the Structure on the Property, including the foundation and footings, and re-grade the construction site to match the existing yard by November 1, 2019. 2. Unless an Answer is filed within 20 days of service, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 463.18, if the Owners do not comply with this Order, a motion for summary enforcement of this Order will be made to the District Court of Washington County. If summary enforcement is sought, the Court may issue a judgment giving the Owners reasonable time to comply with the City’s Order. If there is no compliance, the City will be authorized to remove the Structure on the Property. The cost of demolition of the Structure may be a lien against the real estate, which may be levied and collected as a special assessment. Adopted this 3rd day of September 2019. _________________________________ City Clerk Cindy Shilts From: Sent: To: JOHN T Kramer <INSPJACK@msn.com> Sunday, February 04, 2018 11:16 AM Cindy Shilts Subject: RE: Stephen & Patty Ogborn Accessory Structure located at 7940 Neal Ave. Hi Cindy, Thank you for the information regarding this property. I have only two inspections that were performed for the garage project. 1. Footing Inspection: 7/31/2015 2. 2. Foundation Inspection: October 9,2015. If you need anything else please let me know Jack Kramer From:JOHN T Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 5:54 PM To: 'Cindy Shilts' <cshilts@ci.stillwater.mn.us> Subject: Stephen & Patty Ogborn Accessory Structure located at 7940 Neal Ave. Hi Cindy, Mr. & Mrs. Ogborn applied for a building permit on January 12,2015 to construct an accessory structure prior to the final annexation date. As you are aware the structure has not been completed and I'm receiving calls from neighbors who are concerned on the status of the structure. The original permit began with a footing & foundation inspection, unfortunately his progress was minimal at best. He requested several extensions of the original permit which were approved ,again he made very little progress. Based on the current complaints I was planning to advise Mr. Ogborn that the structure was in violation of building codes and nuisance ordinances. I reviewed the violations with the Township Planner Sherri Buss and Town Attorney Soren Mattock and I was advised that Mr. Ogborn was originally issued a Certificate of compliance by the planner and revoked due to the fact the COC expired. The City Attorney indicated that the Township can no longer be involved due to the fact all permits have expired and the annexation that occurred. If you would like to speak with the Planner Sherri Buss she can be contacted at 651-292-4582. I'm "sorry" to give this problem to you, unfortunately due to the legalities, I can no longer work with the homeowner. If you need any information from me please feel free to contact me 651-351-5051. Thank you, Jack Kramer Building Official Stillwater Township. EXHIBIT 1 I . ' I JS, ·1 -......:1 ;r •• Servicing Construction since "'1962 555 Baker Ave. W. Winsted, MN 55395 Phone: 320-485-3861 FAX: 320-485-3000 I-Ship To 7940 Neal Ave N 1-D-96 1 put east of garage slab drive on yard Stillwater MN Washington County Sold To: Arrow B.C . Stillwater 2000 West Tower Drive Stillwater MN 55082 Work Order 412684 Ship No. Ship Date Littfin Job No. Group Group No . Order Dale P.O. Number .Load Run Location & Drop Truck Job Name Steve Ogborn Oraered By Chris Bauman Written By Dallas Yurek Salesman Gary Alleman Phone 651-439-3518 Fax 651-439-2720 Driver Fritz Lukes Loader Joe Helmbrecht Note1:f ok to drive on-the yard anci l o pu dlie trusses 6n 'the east s1defoflhe garage .slab ---,~~·· The following listed )lery1s have bee!J,receiv<;d in good condition (Exceptions noted) / /,tiV(il,-:-, '. / L J(~,-:r, Received by: L,,,,-7/i !.· J l.lJ,e ,'t·"' Jt1t .Y!,.,_u~.r1,_....___--="------- Date: {( /; // ~/"° • ·; df / ( !. Roof Trusses Profile QTY Label Span Slopes Chords Overhang Cantilever Family Max Width Top Bottom T/B Lft/ Rght Lft / Rght ~1111~ 1 A 26-00-00 12.00 3 01-00-00 Special Truss 09-10-09 12.00 4 01-00-00 ~ 2 A1 26-00-00 12.00 5.00 4 01-00-00 Special Truss 09-10-09 12.00 5.00 4 01-00-00 LT)l(I'\. 14 A2 I 21HJO-OO I 12.00 5.00 4 01-00-00 y ~ Special Truss 09-10-09 12.00 5 .00 4 - ~ 1 A3 26-00-00 12.00l_;j 4 01-00-00 Special Truss 09-10-09 12.00 5.00 4 01-00-00 ~ 1 B 26-00-00 8.00 4 01-00-00 .. Special Truss 09-08-03 8.00 4 01-00-00 ·- ~ I 5 I B1 l 26-00-00 8.00 l 4 01-00-00 . Special Truss 09-08-03 8.00 4 01-00-00 ~ 2 l_!~eclal Truss I 26-00-00 I :::1 l 6 I I 09-02-00 10 /~ 16 p 07-11-02 12.00 4 Special Truss 04-06-06 12.00 4 A 1h 2 P1 07-11-02 l 12.00 4 Special Truss 04-06-06 12.00 4 ,/.( ~ 1 V 18-07-10 8.00 4 Special Truss 06-02-09 8.00 4 -- ~ 1 I V1 12-07-10 8.00 4 . Special Truss 04-02-09 8.00 4 A~ 1 V2 06-07-10 8.00 4 l Special Truss 02-02-09 8.00 4 s 47 Roof Trusses EXHIBIT ROOF 447709 1 8/14/2015 412684 ROOF 438114 I 8/05/2015 58666!i . 8877 3 2 , 1 0234 Date: 8/12/2015 Time: 2:42 PM OFFICE COPY Dispatch Ticket (Rev. 001a) Work Order 412684 ROOF QTY Label Item No. Span I Fastener Depth .. ,d Type Oesaiptlor Max Height Series Thickness " z HUS.26 ~ I J Nails 12 ~ Hanger "*~ 002 fil:JS26 Heavy Single i .. ZN ' I I· I 5 HN16D ·, N_~i1$ 1 # 16d·Nalls for Hangers . Job Paci(- I I 1 Bracing and Installation Information . 18 011\er-Pieces Date: 8112/2015 Time; 2:42 PM OFFICE COPY Dlspaleh llcket (Rev. C Job , Truss Type ,412684 QROOF1 -Arrow--Steve Ogbcirr1 ···· QROOF1 CAP GABLE Littfin Truss Company , Winsted.MN. Joe R-:-- ---,Qty 117 I .JobReference(c1>lionalJ. _______ -----------------------______ __ _ i ----··-7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTek tndustnes, Inc. Tue Oct 27 14 :56:04 2015 Page 1 tD:co4qpl6uW1DeWeydl6aPXXyPAyy-JQxB05_gOT?TMZG4SFJvMWedlVUAKL7TuZqsF _yPAsf LO.II.DING (psf) TCL 35.0 (Roof Snow=35.0) TCOL 10.0 i I. 1 1 SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 Lumber DOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 0-0-0 L--- 12.00112" / / (0-1-10J(lf-i!f-1t1) 0-0-0 L,..._ ________ _ CSI. TC 0.04 BC 0.02 WB 0.02 (Matr ix ) 1.5x4 2-0 -0 4-0-0 ---···-----------~ _ __i Scale= 1 :12.3 ' ' T·\ ' ·, ' ' ·, 4 ·.._, 5 0 .... If 0 6 q 2x4 (0-1-10)(0-1-10) '"(0-1-10) 4-9-0 4:0·0 -------. DEFL in (foe) l/defl Ud PLATES GRIP Vert(LL) n/a n/a 989 MT20 197/144 Vert(TL) n/a n/a 999 Horz(TL) 0.00 5 n/a nla Weight: 12 lb FT= 20% BCLL 0.0 I BCOL _______ 10.0 ----· . -----------' -·-------·-------····--------··· LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2X4 DF-N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud REACTIONS. All bearings 4-0-0. (lb)· Max Herz 1=-34(LC B) Max Uplift All uplift 100 lb or less at Joint(s) 1, 5 , 2, 4 Max Grav All reactions 250 lb or less at joint(s) 1, 5, 2, 4, 6 FORCES. (lb)· Max. Comp./Max. Ten.· All forces 250 (lb) or less-except when shown. NOTES-(12-14) BRACING· TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 4-0-0 oc: puriins. Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10·0-0 oc br_a __ ci_ng=--·---- r Milek recommends that Stabilizers-arid required cross bracing be instai ied during truss-·· .... · erection. In accordance with Stabillz.er lnstallationgulde. ____ .... 1) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6.0psi; BCDL=B .Opsf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Corner(3) zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left end right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber D0L=1.60 plate grip D0L=1.60 2) Truss desig11ed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard Industry Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designer as per ANS 1/TPI 1. 3) TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pf=35 .0 psf (flat roar snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Cl= 1 4) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted. 5) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing. 6) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc. 7) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bonom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 8) Bearing at joinl(s) 1, 2 considers parallel to grain value using ANSJITPI 1 angle to grain formula . Building designer should verify capacity of bearing surface . 9) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss lo bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 1, 5, 2, 4. cBilii1•·iii!l~~l!breaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. ---·-· {()_,~;) t! c, ~:,'l '°\Jll ll , > 'Tn,ss /i '' I' .-"-: ',-.-/ ·< I . .,. ,; .• i) . : ~: :>,.::_..;.· . . -·--·-· ---· ., . 1..--,,:~~·;;1;~ ,· . -·, (L.;.,·· . ---·-i:-····,P iy'"·~-F 12 684QRO OF Ai row B Steve .Ogb.orn 1 j oROOF 1001 L----------------·------Lit tfi n Tn.:ss Coir~p:my . V•li ns:ted, MN, SwcJ -------·-· ____ IJ.!'!!.l~~!~.JQE.li~,~---. ·--:-·--.---~-.:--·· -----'-----· ·-·------------7 .600 s Oct 3 201 "1 r,A iTet lndm;lnu s, In c:. Y./cd Jan 21 0 3.59:10 .2015 rin!J U l 10 :iJMUcCvX OietqBUr1Xxo Mz~P-B2_jyAKUk8 6gaCM0Pkt8jk 9CMCeTMCWN YVaLVuzlAws 13·0-0 19-4-12 -26·0 ·U 27 ·0 ·0 -1-0-0 0-0·0 6-7-4 l_J,L......_ _________ ._L _ --·- ! LOADING (psi) SPACING-2-0-0 CSI. TCLL 35.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0 .78 (Roof Snow=35.0) Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.68 TCDL 10 .0 Rep Stress Iner NO WB 0.44 BCLL 0 .0 Code IRC2012fTPl2007 (Matr ix-M) BCDL 10 .0 LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No .2 BOT CHORD 2x4 DF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No.2 ·- -'·-··· ---· ·------··-· -.-.1 .. ---" ----·--------..1------.J 5x4 :::: . DEFL. in (loc) I/dell Ud PLATES GRIP Vert(LL) -0 .10 10-13 >999 240 MT20 197/144 Vert(TL) -0 .27 10-13 :,999 180 Horz(fL) 0.05 6 n/a nla Weight: 103 lb FT= 20% BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Structural wood sheathing di rectly applied or 3-3-7 oc purlins. Rigid celling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . Scale= 1.55 .5 WEBS 2X3 SPF Stud I Milek recom mends tha t St abili zers and req uired cross bra cin g be insta ll ed ducin g tru ss I i erec~on , in accordance wi 1h Stab iliter ln5l allat lon guide. · ___ ... I REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2=1520/0-4-0 (min . 0-1-10), 6=1520/0-4-0 (m in . 0-1-10) Max Horz 2=-178(LC 10) Max Uplift2=-27(LC 12), 6=-27(LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Ma x. Co mp.lMax. Ten.· All forces 25 0 (lb) or less exce pt when shown . TOP CHORD 2·12=-53 310, 12-17=-2071/17, 3-17=-;925 /51 , 3-16=-1827/36, 4-18=-1650/116, 4-19=-16501116, 5-19=-1827/96, 5-20=-1926/51, 15-20=-2071/17, 6-15=-533/0 BOT CHORD 11-13=-151/484, 10-13=-6211603, 9-10=0/1059, 8-9=011059, 8-16=0/1603, 14-16=-64/457 WEBS 3-1 0=-526/164, 4·10=-73/724 , 4-8=·73/724, 5-8=-526/184, 2-11=·646/0, 12 -13=-417/253, 11-12=-68810, 2-13=0/377 , 6-14=-646/0 , 15-16=-417/245. 14-15=-689/0 , 6-16=0/377 NOTES-(9-11) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-10 ; Vult=11 ~mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph ; TCDL=6 .0psf; BCDL=6 .0p si ; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed ; MWFRS (envelo pe ) automat ic zone and C-C Exterior(2) -1 ·0·0 to 2-0-0, lnteri or(1 ). 2-0-0 to 13-0-0, Exterior(2) 13-0-0 to 16-0-0 zone; cantile v er left and right expose d ; end ve rtical lefli:!nd right exposed ;C-C lor members and forces & MWFRS lor reactions shown ; Lumber DOL=1 .15 plate grip DOL=1 .15 2) TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pf=35 .0 psf (flat roof snow); Calegory II ; Exp B; Part ially Ex ~.: Ct= 1 3) This truss has been chec ked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 4) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof li ve load of 16.0 psf or 1.0 0 times flal roo f load of 35.0 ps i on overhangs non-concurrent w ith other live load s 5) This truss has been des igned for a 10 .0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 6) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 27 lb uplift at joint 2 and 27 lb uplift atjoinl 6. 7) This t:uss is designed in acco rdance w ith the 2012 lnternalional Residential Code secti ons Rso2 .11 .1 and R802 .10 .2 and re ferenced standard A NSt/TPt 1 B) "Semi-rigid pitchbrea ks includi ng heels" Member e nd tixily model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. 9) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corros ive or greater than 19 percent moisture , and moi sture of lu mbe r not to exceed 19 percent 10) II is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSI/TPI 1, Section 2. dcl~11iiueoi,1gV~~I! QOnditions, see Piggyback tr uss connection detail for ba se to cap truss co nn ec tions . · ~~~F -· ·--1~~~s ------~------·· __ -_--·1;~z;,Jl·· __ --··_·-·---·--·-··-----·-1 J I -----·-·, ---------··· ·-·-~Ply -· -·1· : 0 :~.::: 11 ::::,: Arrow.B Steve Ogborn ·-· -··-·· _J L1'.le r· Tr\Jso Ccn1 p2ny. Wrnst~d. MN, Swd 7 .600 s Oct 3 2014 MiTck lnuus lnes. Inc. WcrJ Ja n 21 08.5fi .19 201 5 Page 2 ID :iJMUcCvX_OielqBUrtXxoM2lAxP-82jyAKUk86gaCMDPk18jk9CMCel MCWNYVaLV117l/\ws LOAD CASE(S) Standard l41268•fOR6"6F1 A-rrow ·steve Ogborn · 1 i ./o b ORbOF1 ' ·TruSS I iA1 Littfin truss Company, Winsted , MN .' Joe R. - -. -__ 2. !Job Reference ~p)ionaJL_ ___________ .... ··-. __ ·---·-----___ ·····-· ·-·· ········-····· . --·· -·--i .630 s J~I 9 2015 MiTek Industries, Inc. Tue Oct 27 14:52 :40 2015 Page 1 tD :cu4qpl6uwfDeWeydL6aPXXyPAyy-HBc3aLWj3olPuDgtVPf45V8bJGfUXuHR_qP34pyPAvr 'a "' ' ~ C +~ C\l - ___ 11-.0-0 ___ 15-p -o 18~7-3 ___ ... _23.-,2~~ ___ .. __ 2_~-,°.:~,27-o-o -1-0 -0 0-0-0 . 3-9-11 7-4-1 3 I ·----·---·--••---- 6x6 ::. 3x5 -:: 12.00 ;1:f 1.5x4 :::. 4xB .· O-<?-O 7 ~,-13 131)-0 -13-0-0 -5-7 -3° 0-0·0 1·0.0'-------·-2G-0-0 1--. ·---------·--·· 6x6 ::: 27 1.5x4 ::::: 20 o-;H,(011-B) ~#10# 18-7-3 26-0-0 . ··--·-----·--·J 5-?-3 13-,0-0 ·-------l-..Q_-R Scale= 1 :69.8 Plate Offsets ()DJ-~~~-4;Q±g j: [I:0-4-4 ,0-1-12]. 11 1:0-7-3,0-3-2]. [_14 :0-4.:~·=·===== __ __.;c._.:.__ ___________ _ ---------- LOAOING (psi) SP~CING· 2•0•0 cs1. I DEFL TCLL 35 .o Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.74 I Vert(LL) (Roof Snow=35 .0) Lumber OOL 1.15 BC 0.85 I Vert(n) TCOL IO .O Rep Stress Iner YES WB 0.87 Horz(TL) in (loc) -0.33 14-15 -0 .64 14-15 0.94 11 I/dell >938 >491 n/a Ud 240 180 n/a i I PLATES MT20 Weight: 135 lb GRIP 197/144 FT= 20% :g~i 1~:~ Code MNSRC2015fTPl2007 ________ _5 Matrix~~--' -----··----··-------· -----···-····--··----- LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 OF 1800F 1.6E ·except• T2: 2X4 DF No .2 or 2x4 OF-N No .1/No .2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No ,2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud 'Except• W4: 2x4 OF Std or 2x4 SPF Stud SLIDER Left 2x6 DF-N or OF 1800F 1.6E 2-11-8, Right 2x6 OF-N cir DF 1800F 1.6E 2-11 -B REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2=1520/0-3-6 (min . 0-1-6), 11=1520/0-3-8 (min. 0-1-8) Max Herz 2=-229(LC 10) FORCES. (lbJ -Max. Comp./Max. Ten. • Al! forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 2-6-3 oc purlins, except 2-0-0 oc purlins (3-1-15 max.): 6-7. Rigid ceiling directly applied cir 10-0-0 oc bracing. 'M TTek recommends that Stabilizers and requ ired cross bracing be instalieifdtiring trus·s-···-··'.1 :_~tion0 _kl accordance w ith Stabilizer Installation gu ide. ---·--·· --···--· _ -··-····-·-· . TOP CHORD 2-17=-1410133 , 3•17=-751/65 , 3-4=-35161167 , 4-5"·3519/51 , S-24=-2886/0 , 6-24"·284B/O, 6-25=-3013/0 , 25-26=-3013/0, 7-26"--3013/0, 7-27=-284810 , 8-27"-2886/0, 8-9=-3519/0 , 9-10=-3516/0, 10-21"·751/31, 11-21=-141010 BOT CHORD 16-18=-203/1388, 15-18=-227/2762, 14-15=-84/2991, 13-14=012991, 13-22=012762, 20-22=0/1334 WEBS 5-14=-5541233, 6-1 4=01 1970, i -14=011970, 9·13=·51/262, 8-14=·5i7/254 , 2-16=-1120/69, 18-19=-759/63, 17-19=0 1606, 2·19=0/506, 16-19=-1306/41 , 3-19=-2915/90, 11-20=-1120133. 22-23=-759/7, 21-23=0/606 , 11-23=0/506, 20·23"·130617, 10-23'=-291510 . NOTES-(10-12) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-10 ; Vul \=114mph (3 -second gust ) V (IRC2012)=90mph: TCDL=6 .0psf ; BCDL=6 .0psf; h =231t : Cat. II ; Exp 8 ; enclosed ; MWFRS (envel ope) automatic zone and C-C Exterlor(2 ) -1-0-0 to 2·0·0 . lnterior(1) 2-0-0 to 11 -0-0 , Exterior(2) 11 -0-0 to 18-0-0 . lnterior(1) 18-0-0 to 27-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right ex posed :C-C for mem bers a nd forces & MWFRS for reactions shown : Lum ber D0 L=1 .15 plate grip DOL=1.15 2HtCL L:dASCE 7-10 ; Pf=~5.0 psf (Oil ! roof snow): Cateoory II ; Ex p 6 ; Partiall y Ex p.: Ct= 1 C6n inue on pag e 2 - 1 Job- ' QROOF1 ·i riuss :A1 I Littfin Truss Company, V\'insted , MN , Joe R. NOTES-(10-12) I Truss Type •• j·SCISSORS . -------··--·----··--·-..... ------ 3) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . Ply -·--i41 268•ro·RO OF1 ,,.,/row Steve.Ogbo rr1 2 1! _i ___ J ___ 1JobRererence(cW_ional)__ ___ '=' ______________________ -·-_ 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTe~ lnduslries, Inc. Tue Ocl 27 14 :52:40 2015 Page 2 ID :cu•lqpl6uwfOoWeydL6aPXXyPAyy-HBc3aL"'13olPuDgtVPf45V8bJGfUXuHR_qP34 pyPAvr 4) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 12.0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 35.0 psf on overhangs non -concurrent with other Jive loads . 5) Provide adequate drainage to prevent water ponding . 6) This truss has been des igned for a 1 o.o psf bottom chord live :oad nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 7) Bearing at joint(s) 2. 11 considers parallel to grain value using ANSI/TPI 1 angle to grain formula. Building designer should verify capacity of bearing surface. 8) "Semi-rigid pltchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. 9) Graph ical purlin representation does not depict the size or the .or ientation of the purtin along the top and /or bottom chord . 1 O) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greaterthan 19 percent mo isture, and mo ist ure of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 11) It is lhe responsib ility of the engineer of record to determine the su it ab ility of this component for this project per ANSI/TPt 1, Section 2. 12) For Piggyback conditions. see Plggybac.~ truss connection deta il for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S} Standard Job Trus s , Truss Typ e ,QROOF1 .A2 1 sc1ss_0Rs -,,Qty I ly- 14 ·-·-·--·· Littfin Truss Company, Winsted, MN, Joe R. 26 0-3-8(/:g 1-8) 6x8 II 0-0-0 -----5-7-3 ___ 7_-4_·,1_3 _____ 13-,0-0 _1~8,'-~7-·3 ___ _ 0.9:-0 ______ 5.7.3 -13 ,0-0 1-0-0-·-26-0-0 Plaie· Offsets (X . Y):--[2 :0-7-3.,0·3·2). (6 :0-4-4,o-·""1-c.1=-=2"").-=[7=-:o=--4--=.--4'"",0-.1-12), (11:0-6-15 ,0-2-10). (13 :0-4-0 .0-3-12] LOADING (psi) I TCLL 35 _0 I SPACING• 2·0-0 CSI . (Roof Snow=35 _0) j Plate Grip DOL 1.15 T 8 CC 0.74 Lumber DOL 1.15 0.85 TCDL 10-0 I Rep Stress Iner YES WB 0.67 BCLL 0.0 Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 (Matrlx-M) OEFL. In (Ice) 1/defl Vert(LL) -0.33 13-14 >836 Vert(n) -0.64 13-14 >490 Horz(TL) 0 .94 11 n/a 3X8 ·;; ___ 26·,0·0 13-,0-0 ·--1 Lid 240 180 nla I~ •J, I'° i i~J' ·o Scale= 1:69.8 PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 Weight : 133 lb FT= 20% SCQL 10.0 -----·-·------------- LUMBER· TOP CHORD 2x4 DF 1800F 1.6E •Except• T2: 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF·N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 OF·N No.1/No.2 WEBS 2X3 SPF Stud ·Except• W4: 2x4 OF Std or 2x4 SPF Stud SLIDER Lett 2X6 DF-N or OF 1BOOF 1.6E 2·11·8, Right 2X6 DF-N or OF 1800F 1.BE 2·11-6 REACTIONS. (lb/size) 11=1426/0·3-8 (min. 0-1-8), 2aa1522/0-3-8 (min. 0-1·6) Max Horz 2==223(LC 9) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max. Ten. -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . BRACING- TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 2·6-3 oc purlins, except 2-0-0 oc purlins (3-1-15 max .): 6-7. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc b_ra_c~in,..9~---.,----, MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracing be installed durfng t n.iss---'j ~ection,.!!l_accordence with Stabilizer lnstallat'9..!!..9Ulde~.. ·---··-··- TOP CHORD 2-20=-1411/41, 3-20=-751/68, 3-4=-3521/191, 4-5==-3525/76, 6·23=·2892/0, 6·23==·2854/0, 6-24=·3020/0, 24-25=-3020/0, 7-25=·3020/0, 7-26=-2854/0, 8-26=-2892/0, 8·9"·3535/0, S-27=-3442/49, 10-27=-3542/36, 10·16a:-872/53, 11-16=·1459/0 BOT CHORD 19-21=-223/1353, 14-21=-261/2766, 13-14=-107/2896, 12-13=0/3003, 12-17=0/2790, 15-17=-23/1346 WEBS 5-13=-5551232, 6-13=0/1975, 7·13=0/1975 , 8-13=·561/251 , 11·15=-1019/10, 17-18=-771/23, 16-18=0/715, 11-18=0/577, 15-18=-1323/33, 10-18=-2616/0, 2-19=·1122175, 21·22=-761170, 20·22=0/807, 2·22=0/506, 19-22=-1306/47, 3-22=-2920/112 NOTES-(10-12) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph ; TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=6 ,0psf; h=23ft; Cat. JI ; Exp B; enclosed ; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2)-1·0-0 to 2-0-0, lnterlor(1) 2-0-0 to 11-0-0, Exterior(2) 11-0·0 to 1B-O·O. lnterior(1) 18-0-0 to 26-0·0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vert ical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown ; Lumber D0L=1.15 plate grip D0L=1 .15 2) TCLL: ASCE 7·10; Pl=35.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 3l This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only . except as noted. C6ntinued on page 2 1~~oOF . 1 ~~~ · ~~:"" . ]~" _ ]' __ 1 !:,~::::,,::~: Acmw ~ Steve ~~bo,n-~-, _ _, ~-J Lil lfin Tr uss Coim,i,riy.\\lilslud , ,\\l~S-;:;a----------..... -···--.. ·-··------·· .... ---7 .00 0 s Ocl 3 201~ rAiTc l: ln <iustrles. Inc. Wed Ja n :tl 03 :~9 :o3 ,015 ~a¥.e ' . ID :iJMUcCvX. 01G1q8U11X,<0MzlAl<P-nlq?uzVGRRtl1FMRvD9vQH1lkniN1 ,odaPRmlE4 __ sl>r:.w, -1-0-0 0-0-0 13-0-0 26-0-0 27-0-0 '--L-----·--·· ---·-··----·----·-----------__ 1.--1 33 3x6 = 4X4:::: 11 ~~ 5M Scala= 1;69 .0 1.o.~ 26-0-0 ------------v~:~ =======================::;:=================================;::========================;===========-==~~--==-=======================:~=======:==:===================================== LOADING (psi) TCLL 35.0 (Roof Snow=35.0) SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TCDL 10 .0 BCLL 0.0 BCOL 1 0 .0 Lumber DOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner NO Code IRC2012!TPl2007 LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF·N No .1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No.2 OTHERS 2X3 SPF Stud REACTIONS. All bearings 26-0-0 . (lb). Max Hor22=-178(LC 10) CSI. TC 0.10 BC 0.04 WB 0.22 (Matrix} DEFL. Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD WEBS Max Uplift All uplift 100 lb or less atjoint(s} 2. 31 , 32, 34 , 35, 36, 37, 38 , 39, 26 , 27 , 26, 25, 24 , 23, 22 in (lac) 0.00 20 0.00 20 0 ,01 20 1/defl n/r n/r n/a Ud 120 120 n/a PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 Weight: 147 lb FT= 20% Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purllns. Rig id ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . 1 Row at midpt 11 -30 !Milek recommends tha i Stabilizers and require d crosl; bracing be installed during truss • l l~ection . in accordance y,illl Stab ilizer lnstallat;on guide. _____ _ Max-.~v .. All reactions 250 lb or less at joint(s} 2, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 29, 28, 27 , 26 , 25, 24, 23, 22, ~1) FORCES. (lb) -Max. CompJMax. Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. NOTES• (13-15) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; _TCDL=6 .0pst; BCDL=6.0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (emJ1~:,..;il ,utomatic zone and C-G Corner(3) -1-0-0 to 2-0-0, Exterior(2) 2-0-0 to 13-0-0, Corner(3} 13-0-0 to 16-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed;CC'-l!t t:ll!llr.embers and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber DOL=1.15 plate grip DOL=1.15 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only . For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard Industry Gable End De~~i'a; ,S3pplicabJe, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSlfTPl 1. 3i TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pf=35.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 4) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only , except as noted . 5) This truss has b_een designed for greater of min roof live load of 16.0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 35.0 psi on overhangs non-concurrent wilh ,g;;1:,,.;, s,:.2 loads . 6) All plates are 1 .5x 4 MT20 unless otherwise indicated. 7) Gable requ ires continuous bottom chord bearing . 8) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc . 9) This truss has beer, des :g·ned for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load ncnconOJrrent wilh any olher live loads . 1 O} Provide mech anical connectio n (by others} of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift .it j oint (s} 2, 31, 32, 34 , 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 28, 27, 26. 25, 24, 23, 22 . 11) This truss is designed in accordance wilh the 2012 lnlernational Res idential Code sections RS02 .11.1 and H802, 10.2 and refei'enced standard ANSlrTPI 1 dz~i/~,!,\si/J~!f:l:!breaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of lh1s uuss . j~~ooF ·-------J :O~ ---· Liitfin T ru ss Company, \.".'i1,ste d, f•llN, Swd ····=1;~~s~ype_:.=~~--· --------~~=r=J~ --1J:::: 1 ::n:::,:: 1 Arrow B Steve Ogborn --. -····· ______ ! ·-----·--···-------7.600 s Oct 3 201,11.l!Te;<. lntlu,lries, Inc. W~ct Jan 2108·5934 2015 Pago 2 ID :IJMUcCvX_OielqBUrtXxoMzlAxP·Fx0051Vu Cl7XIW?5nNRfquHl<6FYNM1tb?UeX XzlAwd 13) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 14) It is the resp onsibility of the enginee r of record to determine the suitability of th is component for this project pe r ANSlfTP I 1, Section 2. 15) For Piggyback conditions , see Piggyback truss connect ion de tail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard !Jo !, r ill$$ EOOF ---003 -·--·-- LiHfin Truss Company, \'\111sJed, MN . Swd ·----,~~~;~ -·------·----·---··· -·--1~1)~--__ I ly .Jto ~ ::,:,:,::: 1 :.:lArro ~-B ... :teve O~bor~---·.-· ---~ ---------7 GOO s Ocl 3 201~ MiTek hi<Ju,!nes. Inc . Wed Jan 21 Os.00.~9 21110 Pago 1 1D:iJMUcCvX_Oietq8Ur1XxoMz1AxP-rRpyl<XlgvJBJAVUb4XSvycTsWRz05G •. SxyyaJGzlAvc Plate OHsets rX ,Yl-- LOADING (psi) TCLL 35.0 (Roof Snow=35.0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0 .0 BCDL 10 .0 LUMBER· -1-0-0 0-0-0 ,_..,___ __ _ 12 V"t;:14 0-4-0~B) 5x1llcMf18H1'- ·-0-0 6-10-1 ~--· 12 :0-2., .Q.:;.01, (3 :0-0 -12,0-2-0J. {5 :0-0-12 .0-2-0], (£:0 -2-1 .0-3-0]. (9 :0-8-0.0-6-4 SPACING-2-0-0 CSI. Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.88 Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0 .60 Rep Stress Iner NO WB 0.91 Code IRC2012/TP12007 (Malrlx-M) 13-0-0 19-1-15 26-0-0 27 -0-0 -------'--' 6x10 MT18H II 4 DEFL. in (loc) I/den Ud PLATES GRIP Vert(Ll) -0 .21 8-9 >999 240 MT20 197/144 Vert(TL) -0 .39 8-9 >790 180 MT18H 197/144 Horz(TL) 0 .09 6 n/a n/a M18SHS 244/190 Weight: 321 lb FT= 20% - TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF 2400F 2.0E BOT CHORD 2X8 SP 2400F 2.0E • WEBS 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x-4 DF-N No.1/No.2 •Except• W3: 2x4 DF 1800F 1.6E BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Struc1ural wood sheathing direc11y applied or 3-7-7 oc purllns. Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2=10815/0-4-0 (req. 0-4-8), 6=10815/0-4-0 (req . 0-4-8) Max Horz2=-178(LC 10) Max Uplift2=·511 (LC 12), 6=·511 (LC 13) FORCES . (lb) -Max. Comp./Max. Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when s how;1. TOP CHORD 2-13=-11590/483, 13-18=-14412/648, 3-18=-1-1309/680, 3-18=-9903/510, 4-19=-8742/530, 4-20=-97421530, 5-20=-9903/510, 5-21=·14309/681, 16-21=-14412/649, 6-16=-11590/478 BOT CHORD 12·14=-662/12362, 11-14:;-581/11906, 10-11=-581/11906, 9-10=-581/11906 , 8-9=-479/11908, 8-17=-479/11906, 15-17=-549/12362 WEBS 3-11 =-180/4757, 4-9=-491/102B2, 5-8=-181/4757, 3-9=-4737/345, 5-9=-4737/346, 2-12=-84381359, 13-14=0/1107, 12-13=-1622/55, 2-14=-2706/197, 6-15=-8438/356, 16-17=0/1107, 15-16=-1622/47. 6-17=-2706/200 NOTES-(13-15) 1) 2-ply truss to be connected togeJherwith 10d (0 .120"x3") nails as follows: Top chords coMected as fo!lov,s : 2x4 • 1 row at 0-3-0 cc. Bottom chords connected as follows: 2xB -2 rows staggered at 0-6-0 oc. Webs connected as follows: 2x4 • 1 row at 0-9-0 oc. 2) All loads are considered equally applied lo all plies, except if noted as front (F) or back (B) face in the LOAD CASE(S) section. Ply to ply connections h~ve been provided to distribute only loads noted as (F) or (B}. unless otherwise indicated. 3) W ind: ASCE 7-10; Vull=1 i4mph (3-s econd gust) V (IRC20 12)=90mph; TCDL=o.Opsl. BCDL=6.0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II : Exp B; enclosed : MWFRS (envel ope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) ·1 ·0-0 to 2-0-0, lnterior(l ) 2-G-0 to 13-0-0. Ex terior (2) 13-Ci-O to 16-0 -0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed: end v;;nical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & M\l'!FRS for reactions shown : Lu mbe r DOL=i .15 p!aic, g rip DbL=1:15 4) TCLL : A SCE 7-10: P/=35 .0 psf (flat roof snow); Ca ,ego:y II : Exp B , Partially Exp.: Ct= 1 c6JirntiJH1~¥: i~M1z!n chec~ed for un iform snow 1o ad 011 1y . except as noted. Scale = 1 :69 .9 - --·--·-------~·-···----!J ob . Truss E._ROOF ! 003 Litt fi n Truss Company , W asl ed, MN, Swd ___ ]~ru~~~e ===--=~·-··· ···-=nPl1• 2 l~o~,~,:::n:::::rrow B Steve Ogborn --~~-----~~:--.~-I ------7 .GO O s Oct 3 201~ MiTeklrHJll~lri~s. In c. V,J cd Ja n 21 OU:00 :39 ::015 P.a ut 2 NOTES-(13-15) 1D :iJMUcCvX_OielqBUrtXxoMzlAxP-rRpykXlgvj8 .JAVU h•1 X5vycToWi<z0 5G_D,n~J(;z1 1\•.,·. 6) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 16.0 psf or 1.00 times fiat roof load of 35.0 psf on overhangs non-eoncurrent with other live loads. 7) All plates are MT20 plates unless otherwise indicated . 8) This truss has been designed ror a 10.0 psf bottom chord five load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 9) WARNING: Required bearing size at joint(s) 2 , 6 greater than input bearing size. 10) Provide mechanical connection (by others) or truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift atjoint(s) except ut=lb) 2=511, 6=511 . 11) This truss is designed in accordance with the 2012 International Residential Code sections R502.11 .1 and RB02.10 .2 and referenced standard ANSlfTPI 1. 12) "Semi-rigid pitchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss . 13) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture or lumber not to exceed 19 percent 14) It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANS!fTPI 1, Section 2. 15) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S) Standard 1) Dead+ Snow (balanced): Lumber Jncrease=1.15, Plate Jncrease=1.15 Uniform Loads (plf) Vert: 12-15=-735(F=-715), 1-4=-90, 4-7=-90 · l;o~F ________ ,~~: _____ ~:.:~~~~---';~'.~~~RS ---~~=-~--- Lit1fr n Truss Co111pn ny, Winsle ci, MN, Sw<I ----,~~. ·-1Ply 1 ' s O -------I 1:~:!::!::::!::~-~:__t:e---~bom _______ ··--. -,-··-- -----· ------7 ,500 s Oct 3 201 .: MiTnk ln c!us lnc s, In c. 1/.JGd JJO 2 1 09.0 I 01 20 1:; ?a~: 1 IO :iJlv1UcCvX __ Oielq8UnXxaM21Ax1-'-Cg8HM2Z fJU2Bpl9qNOU3rFNbMJ0ol'Uj0?NHk4 __ _z1AvG +0-00-0-0 5-10-11 13-0-0 20-1-5 26-0-0 27-0-0 ' . --1------------··---·-1----------__ _1.._.._ _________ · .• ...J 6xG =-= o-a~-::-S--10-11 1:;.o.o 20-1-5 ;-o-o ________ .,___ ___________ 2to.-o--_-_-_-_-_____ _ ,---,·------ Pl ate Otlsets CX , Yl (2 :o-1-:i .0-6-2]. [s :0-1.:,.0.s-21 . 111 :0-6-0 .o-:i-e1 LOADING (psf) SPACING-2-0-0 CSI. TCLL 35 .0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.92 (Roof Snow=35.0) Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0.92 TCDL 10.0 Rep Stress Iner NO WB 0.95 BCLL 0.0 Code IRC2012/TPl2007 (Matr ix-M) BCDL 10 .0 LUMBER· TOP CHORD 2x4 SP 2850F 2.3E BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF 2400F 2 .0E DEFL. in (lac) I/dell Lid PLATES Vert(LL) -0 .36 10-11 >871 240 MT20 Vert(TL) -0 .73 10-11 >425 180 Horz{TL) 0.62 8 n/a nia Weight: - Structural wood sheathing directly applied . BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . Scale= 1 :70 .4 GRIP 197/144 1151b FT= 20% - WEBS Jx3 SPF Stud ·Except' W3: 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No.2 SLIDER left 2x6 DF-N or DF 1800F 1.6E 2·11-8, Right 2x6 DF-N or DF 1800F 1.6E 2-11-8 MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross b'racing be insialle d d·uring truss ---------J erection . in accord~nce wilh Stabil izer Installation ouide . ---------I REACTIONS. (lb/si2e) 2=1520/0-4-0 (min. 0-1-8), 8=1520/0--4-0 (min. 0-1-8) Max Horz2=-178(LC 10) Max Uplift2=-25(LC 12), 8=-25(LC 13) FORCES. (lb)· Max. Comp./Max . Ten.· All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . TOP CHORD 2-14=·1141/42, 3-14=-765/85, 3--4=-3795/127 , 4·21=-3106/0, 5-21=-2937/0, 5-22=-2937/16, 6-22=-3106/0, 6-7=-3795/0, 7-18=-765/62, 8-18=-1141/2 BOT CHORD 13-15=-14211314, 12-15=-159/3246, 11-12=-167/3316 , 10-11=0/3316, 10-19=0/3246, 17-19=011314 WEBS 5-11=012601 , 4-11=-577/261, 6-11=-624/303, 2-13=-1021/50 , 15-16=-586/49, 14-16=0/544, 2-16=-7/480, 13-16=-1300/26, 3-16=-3143/17 , 8-17=-1021/33, 19-20=-586/15, 18-20=01544, 8-20=0/480 , 17-20=-130010, 7-20=-314310 NOTES-(10-12) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6 .0psf; BCDL=6.0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) aL1tomatic zone and C-C Exterior(2)-1-0-0 to 2-0-0 , lnterior(1) 2-0-0 lo 13-0-0, Exterior(2) 13-0-0 to 16-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed ;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber DOL=1 .15 plate grip D0L=1 .15 2j TCLL : ASCE 7-1 O; Pf=35.0 psf (flat roof snow): Category II: Exp B; Partially Exp .: Ct= 1 3) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 4 ) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 16 .0 psf o f 1.00 times flat roof load of 35 .0 psr on overhangs non-concurrent w it11 other live loads . 5) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psfbotlom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 6) Bearing al joint(s) 2, 8 considers parallel to grain value using ANSI/TPI 1 angle 10 g12in formula. Building designer should veri(y capacily of bearing surface . 7) Prov ide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 1 oo lb uplift al joint(s) 2, 8. ci!JilliU'cP~~ i~~\S~ned in accordance with the 2012 International Residen1ial Code sections R502 .11.1 and RBD2 .10.2 and rf:fe, enced stan dard ANSI/TPI 1 1 Jcb • · ·1 Tru ss · QROOF 005 [ ____________ _ __ ---_·J ~! __ --,pV ---~1-~l::~::A rrow a Steve Ogborn ---·_···--·-·. ·1 7 .6 00 s Ocl 3 2014 MITek lndusl!ies, Inc. Wert Jun 21 09 .01 .01 2015 Pag~ 2 1D:iJMUcCvX_OletqBUrtXxoMz1AxP-Cg8HM2Zl]UzBpt9qN9U3rFNbMJObFDjO ?Nfl~~ ,,,•.cf'.: tJ ltl in Tru ss Company . WinstQd, rvHO:, Swd NOTES-(10-12) 9) "Semi-rigid pitch breaks including heels " Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. 10) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 11) 11 is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability al this component for this project per ANSI/TPI 1, Section 2. 12) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss conneclions. LOAD CASE(S) Standard 1~~~0; . ~ 1~~; UUfin 1·n.:~:; c-·o-n-,p-~-!\y-_-Wi-,n-s-1c-d-. l-~N~. Swd [ ~Ii· j Ply 1 14'12684 QROO~ Arrow B Steve Ogborn I J !Jell Rclercnce (cp1io!!.e!J._ _______________________ _ ---------·-----·-·· -----------7.600, Oct 3 201~ MiTe~ ln<lusr,i es. Im:. WG<l Jan 21 09:01 :20 20 15 !'age I 10:iJMUcCvX •. OielqE!UrtXxoMzlAxP-vtl~UOHuPMnMMY 1 jOSKTORx?C YCcv4 OONC4 KgWwzlAu, ____ s.._19-11 -----------~0-0 ------20-.1-S --·-·· 26-,0-0 ?7-0-0 -1-0-0 0-0-0 ,_ . Gx6 :=c 0-8,'S ~ 5-10-11 13-0-0 20-1-5 .....J ____ _ j±-O:;_v ______________ __:2c::6-..:0c.::·Oc... ------ ~---------~-----~--·c-c,-,-.;..,---------- 26-0-0 1-0-0 Plate Offsets (X,Yl -[2:0-1-3 .0-6-2]. !6 :0-1-3 ,0-6-2]. 111 :0..s.o,c.3.eJ . LOADING (psf) SPACING-2-0-0 CSI. OEFL In (foe) I/den Ud TCLL 35 .0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.92 Vert(LLJ -0 .36 10-11 >871 240 (Roof Snow=35.0) Lumber DOL 1.15 BC 0 .92 Vert(TL) -0.7310-11 :>425 180 TCDL 10 .0 Rep Stress Iner NO WB 0.95 Horz(TL) 0.62 8 n/a n/a BCLL 0.0 Code IRC2012fTPl2007 (Ma!rlx-M) BCDL \0.0 LUMBER· Structural wood sheathing d irectly applied. PLATES MT20 Weight: 138 lb TOP CHORD 2x4 SP 2850F 2.3E BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF 2400F 2.0E BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Rigid celling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. Sc.ale = 1 :70 4 .. .. GRIP 197/144 FT= 20% WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud 'Except' W3: 2x4 DF No.2 or 2X4 DF-N No.1/No.2 OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud MiTef: recommends ihal Siabllizets and required cross bracing be in~talled during truss erection. in accordance with Stabil izer Installation uide. SLIDER left2x6 DF-N or OF 1800F 1.6E 2-11-8, Right 2x6 DF-N or OF 1800F 1.6E 2-11-8 REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2=152010·4-0 (min. 0•1-8), 8=1520/0-4-0 (min . 0-1-8) Max Horz2=-17S(LC 10) Max Uplifl2=-25(LC 12), 8=-25(LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Max . Comp./Max. Ten ,· All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-44=-1141/42, 3-44=-765/85, 3-4=-3795/127, 4-51=-310610 , 5-51::..2937/0, 5-52=-2937/16, 6-52=-3106/0 , 6-7=-3795/0. 7-48=-765/62, 8-48=-1141/2 BOT CHORD 43-45=-142/1314, 12-45=-159/3246, 11-12=-167/3316, 10-11=0/3316, 10-49=0/3246, 47-49=0/1314 WEBS 5-11=0/2601, 4-11=-577/261, 6-11=-624/303, 2-43=-1021150, 45-46=-586149 , 44-46=0/544, 2-46=-7/480 , 43-46=-1300126 , 3-46=-3143/17, 8-47=-1021/33, 49-50=-586/15, 48-50=0/544, 8-50=0/480, 47-50=-1300/0, 7-50=-3143/0 NOTES-(13-15) 1) \fl/ind : ASCE 7-iO; Vult=i1 4mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=S0mph ; TCDL=6.0psf: 8CDL=6.0psf: h=23ft ; Cat. II : Exp B: en closerl; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone 2nd C-C Ex1er ior{2) -1·0·0 lo 2-0-0. lnterior (1) 2-0-0 to 13-0-0, Ex terior(2) 13-0-0 10 16-0-0 zone : cant ilever le/1 and rig hi exposed : end vertical left and right exposed :C-C tor members and forces & MWFRS for reactfons snown: Lumber DOL=1 .15 plate grip DOL=l.15 2) Truss designed for wind loads in Ille plane or the truss only . Fo r studs exposed 10 win d (normal to the race). see Standard Industry Gable End Deta ils as appl icable , or co nsult qu2lir1ed build ing designer as per ANSlriPI 1. 3) TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pr=35 .0 psf (flat roof sr,ow): Ca tegory II : Exp B: Pa rti al ly Exp.; Ct= 1 4) This lluss has been checked for unifor m snow load only, except as noted . 5) This truss has been designed for greater of min roor five load or 16.0 psi or 1.60 times flat roof load of 35.0 psf on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads . eMl!iB1rJeanap~J/ll4 MT20 unless othe1w ise ind iC<Jl·od. · 1~~0-~F -__ ]~~= -----···--__ ,~~;~~~RS --=--=~~~~-~--__ l~ly __ ry ~1:~ ::r::n:::,:: Arrow 8 S teve Ogborn -~:~~~ __ ___/ Lit lf1n Truss Comp trny . V-/i ns lcd , !\lN. Swd 7 600 s Oct 3 2n,.~ M tTek In dust ri es. Inc. 'A'cd Jan 21 C9 :01 :2C 201 5 r:-agt: 2 IO:iJMUcCvX_OietqBUrtXxoMz1AxP-v1HUOHuPMnMMY1JOSKTORx?CYCC>l4QONC4KgWmt/\11, NOTES-(13-15) 7) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 cc. 8) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 9) Bearing at joint(s) 2 , 8 considers parallel to grain value using ANSlfTPI 1 angle to grain formula. Building designer should verify capacity of bearing surface. 1 O) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 2, 8. 11) This truss is designed in accordance with the 2012 International Residential Code sections R502.11 .1 and RB02 .10.2 and referenced standard ANSlfTPI 1. 12) "Semi-rigid pitchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used In the analysis and design of this truss . 13) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 14) It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this oomponent for this project per ANSlfTPI 1, Section 2. 15) For Piggyback conditions , see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S) Standard . r~~OOF ____ 1~~---_-_--__ 1;~~:yr,e·-··-·-----·-------· 1~t y r•'i, 1 1412684 OROOF Arrow B Stev e Ogborn --, J: , . Jo~ R~t~r.n.;.; j!,p11011al) __ ------_____ _ -·--·-·-· ----------•--·-·-----~O s Oct :i 201-1 MiTil• lndu str:es , Inc. Wed Jan 21 09 :01:51 i:015 Pau i: 1 Litt fi n Tr-.o!:!: Company , \-Vi nsh:d. r.·1N . S w d ID :iJMUcCvX_Ore1qBUrtXxoMzlAXP-klAArtlAqx1GSpZ_RlfOnlnSL 'vT1Xz?glV900q5itA11U • 1·0-0 0-0-0 13-0-0 26-0-0 27-0-0 '-'--· ----·----•----------~ 4x4 = Scale= 1:10 1.8 Plate Offse ts (X.Yl- LOADING (psf) TCLL 35.0 (Roof Snow-=35 .0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL 10 .0 LUMBER- 43 42 41 4x6 II 0-0·0 1rof 12.oor1i 40 39 3B 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 26-0-0 30 29 2B 27 26 25 24 4x6 11 26-0-0 1-0--0 I 12:0-1-E.0 -0-2], !3 :0-0-0,0-0-Cj. 19:0-2-0,0-3-01 . !15 :0-2-0 .0:3·0J . l21 :0-0-.0-0-0 . : ·1-B .0--0 1 122 O 2 21 SPACING-2-0-0 CSI. DEFL. in {loc) I/den Lid Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.10 Vert{LL) 0 .00 22 n/r 120 LumberDOL 1.15 BC 0.07 Vert(TL) 0.00 22 n/r 120 Rep Stress Iner NO WB 0.21 Hori(TL) 0.01 22 n/a n/a Code IRC2012/TPl2007 {Matrix) PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 Weight: 231 lb FT=20% TOP CHORD. 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 OTHERS, 2x3 SPF Stud 'Except' BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD WEBS Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purli!'ls. Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . ST1 O,ST9,ST8: 2x4 DF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No .2 SUDER Left 2x6 DF-N or DF 1800F 1.6E 1-4-5, Right 2x6 DF-N or OF 1 BOOF 1.6E 1-4-5 REACTIONS. All bearings 26-0-0 , {lb) -Max Horz 2=-266(LC 1 O} Max Uplift All uplift 100 lb or less at joint(s) 22, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39 , 40 , 41, 42, 32 , 31, 30, 29, 28 , 27, 26 , 25 except 2=-159(LC 10), 43=-156(LC 12), 24=-141{LC 13) Max Grav All reactions 250 lb or less aljoinl(s) 33, 34, 35, 37 , 38 , 39, 40, 41 , 42, 43, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24 except 2=345(LC 22), 22=309(LC 23) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max . Ten. -All forces 250 {lb) or less exc;;pt when shown. TOP CHORD 2-3=-436/265 , 3-4=-302/199, 20-21 =-257/173, 21-22=-379i271 1 Row at midpt , 12-33.11-34, 10-35, 9-37 ,·13-32, 14-31, 15-30 MiTak recommends that Stabilizers and required ccoss bracing be installed during lruss erection, In accordance wi1h Stab!llzer lnstallalion Au id e . BOT CHORD 2-43=-170/253, 42-43=-170/253, 41-42=-170/253, 40-41=-170/253, 39-40=-170/253 , 38-39=-170/253, 37-38=-170/253, 36-37=-172/253, 35-36=-172/253, 34-35=-172/253, 33-34=-172/253, 32-33=-172/253, 31-32=-172/253, 30-31=-172/253, 29-30=-170/252, 28-29=-170/252, 27-28=-170/252, 26-27=-170/252, 25-26=-170/252, 24-25=-170/252, 22-24=-170/252 NOTES· (13-15) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-,0; Vu11=114mph (3-second gusl) V(IRC2012)=90mph ; TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=6.0pst, h=23ft; Cal If; fap B; enclosed . MWFRS {envelope) 2u1om21 ic zone and C-C Corner{3) -1-0-0 lo 2-0-0, Ex1_erior(2) 2-0-0 lo 13-0,0 . Comer(S) i3-0-0 to 16-0-0 zon e: canlilever left and righl exposed; end ver1ical le /1 and right exposed;C-C for members and i orces & MWFRS for !eacii cns sho\'m : Lumbe r DOL:1. 15 plate grip DOL=1.15 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plan e cf thE trus s only. For sluds exposed lo w ine (normal to :he fa ce), see Standard lnduslry Ga ble End Details as app!rc;ib le, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSI/TPI 1. 3) TCLL : ASCE 7-1 o; Pr=35 .0 psf {flal roof snow); Category II : E:<p B ; Panially Exp.: Ct= 1 4) This trJss has been checke d fer uniform s no'.'J l oad onlv, exceot as noted. t 6Jtrn~i\1¥cn Wat~¥" designed for greater 01 min roar 1ive 1oad of 12.0 psf or 1 .00 un:ies t1at roof 1oad 0135 .o psi on overhangs non -concurrent with 01her live 1oacts . - l ~-~~~F ----·--1~~; ---------F~~~ypo -------···------·-. I T ---· -----··-·-----------· --_E ___ IP 1 1·····-·i to:~,~::":~:1~:Arrow B Steve Ogborn ---· ·----·--· !.i tifin russ Ccmpnr,y. Vvinst ed, MN. S-.·,'d 7 .0 00 s Oc! 3 20i •1 M1T c,\.:. fn m:s 1ri cs, In c. 'N ~d Jan 2 1 09:01 :5 I 20 !5 rant: 2 ID:iJMUcCvX_OielqBUrtXxoMztAxP-klAAr9AqxrGSpZ_RlfOntnSL YT!Xz?gll/900~fi7 !f"''' NOTES-(13-15) 6) All plates are 1.5x4 MT20 unless otherwise indicated. 7) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing. 8) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc. 9) Thi s truss has been designed for a ~0.0 psf botlom chord Jive load ncnconcurrent with any otner Jive loads. . 10) Provide m echani cal connection (by others) or truss to bearing pJatec capable ol wilhStanding 100 lb uplift atjoint(s) 22 . 33, 34 , 35 . 37, 38. 39.•lO.41 , ~2, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25 except Ot=lb) 2=159, 43=156, 24=141 11) Ttils truss is designed in accordance w itn the 2012 lni emational Residen lial Code sections R5D2.1 1.1 and R802 :10.2 and referenced standard ANSlrTPI 1. 12) "Se m i-rigi d pitchbreaf:s including heels"' l•/l ember end fi xity model wa:; used ir, tl1c analys:s and design of thi s truss . 13) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 11? pe rcent 14) It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSlfTPI 1, Section 2. 15) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard ·, Joo Truss Truss Type Piggyback Base Supported Gable 01y Ply 'J : \ \ \~ ~ ( ~ "\{ C ROOF A Lillfln Truss Company, Winsted , MN , Dallas Yurek Job Ref~ren~e (9ptio0i;,.I)_ . . . _ . . -.. 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTeK Industries , Inc Mon Aug 1014:18:47 2015 Page 1 1D :eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1VJypl12-kkaSN1sV\OhkN04nyERLpNjonAwVVj5M7cBNzuOHypDpc -1-0-0 0-0-0 12.00 12 44 3X8 0-0-0 1-0_-6_ 3 4 43 Plat~ Offsets (X ,Y)--[9 :0-2--8,Edge], .[16 :0-2-4,0-1-12}, [22:E9ge):2~s) LOADING (psf) SPACING-2-0-0 TCLL 3 5 .C Plate Gr ip DOL 1.1 5 (Roof Snow=35.0) Lumber DOL 1.1 5 TCDL 10 .0 Rep Stress Iner YES BCLL 0.0 Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 BCDL iO .O LUMBER· 6 5 T,1 S'f3 42 41 8-5-10 17-6-6 3x6 5x4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .·, a T2 -1,1 ,. 17 7 18 19 s'f 6 sn s'r? s r1 sr, sri sir1 sirs 20 ST9 ST1 1 T 1 ST5 ST4 40 39 38 CSI. TC 0.19 BC 0 .06 WB 0 .21 (Matrix) 37 3x6 35 36 34 26-0-0 33 32 DEFL . Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) ST10 ' ST1 2 31 30 29 28 27 26 in (loc) 1/defl Ud 0.00 22 nlr 120 0.00 2°2 n/r 120 0,00 24 n/a n/a 26-0-0 27-0-0 . 3x8 21 25 24 26-0-0 j-0-0 'O ,- M d, PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 Weight: 177 lb FT= 20% Scale = 1 :65 9 TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 DF No .2 or 2X4 DF-N No.1/No.2 BRACING- TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purlins, except end verticals, and 2-0-0 oc purllns (6-0-0 max.): 9-16 . WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud REACTIONS. All bearings 26-0-0. (lb) -Max Herz 44=-198(LC 10) BOT CHORD WEBS Rigid ceiling directly applied or 6-0-0 oc bracing . 1 Row al midpl 16-30, 15-31 , 14-32, 13-33, 12-34, 11-35, 10-37, 8-38 M-ITek recommends that Stabilizers -andrequired cross bracing be In-stalled during truss _er~~.l!OIJ, in ~~~9r9ar,,C!! ~ilD Stabillzer lnsl~_ll_i1U9.n __ gu_iQe , Max Uplift All uplift 100 lb or less at joint(s) 24, 31 , 32, 33 , 34, 35, 39 , 40, 41 , 42, 29, 28, 27, 26 except 44=-101 (LC 8), 43=-117(LC 12), 25=-10B(LC 13) Max Grav All reactions 250 lb or less atjoint(s) 24, 30, 31, 32 , 33 , 34, 35 , 37, 38 , 39, 40 , 41, 42. 43, 29, 28. 27. 26, 25 except 44=261 (LC 21) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max . Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . NOTES-(15-17) 1) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6 .0psf; BCDL=6 .0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Corner(3) -1-0-0 to 2-0-0. Exlerior(2) 2-0-0 lo 8-5-10, Corner(3) 8-5-10 to 20-6-6, Ex1erior(2) 20-6-6 to 27-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber D0L=1.60 plate grip DOL=1 .60 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only . For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face). see Standard Industry Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSI/TPI 1. 3) TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pf=35.0 psr (flat roof snow); Category II ; Exp B ; Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 4) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 5) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 12 .0 psf or 1 .00 limes flat roof load of 35.0 psi on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads 6) Provide adequate drainage lo prevent water ponding. 7) AU plates are 1.5x4 MT20 unless otherwise indicated . B) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing . c?~JtfHa~cl'b~~9i\j\¥ 2heathed from one race or securely braced against lateral movement (i.e . diagonal web). Job ROOF Truss A Littfin Truss Company, Winsted , ·MN, Dallas Yurek NOTES-(15 -17) 1 O) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc. Truss Type : Piggyback Base Supported Gable 11) Th is truss has been designed for a 10.0 psr botlom chord live load nonconcurrent wit h any other li ve loads . Qty P!y Jol:_Reference (opt iona_l) 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTe~ Ind ustries. Inc . Mon Atig ID 14:18 :47 2015 Page 2 1D.eHeVEiAy CTA5e2 Wn 3u_ 1V Jypl 12-kka SN 1 sWDhkN04nyERLpN jonAwV•fiSM 7c6NzuOHypOr,c 12) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of tr uss to bea ri ng plate capable of withstand ing '!00 lb uplift at join:(s) 24 . 3 1, 32 . 33 , 34 . 35 , 39, 40, 41 , 42, 29, 28, 27 , 26 except Qt=lb) 44=101, 43=117, 25=108. 13) "Semi-rigid pitch breaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the ana lysis and design of this truss . 14) Graphical purlin representa tion does not depict the size or the or ientation or the purlin alo ng the top and /or bottom cho rd. 15) Th is truss must not be exposed lo environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture o f l umber not to e ~ceed 19 percent 16) It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSI/TPI 1. Section 2. 17) For Piggyback conditions. see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S) Standard job , ROOF Truss A1 Oty 2 Ply Truss Type Piggyback Base · Job R~fere!'~e. (opti<J nal) _ _ _ 7.630 s Jul 9 20t 5 Milek Industries . Inc. Mon Aug 10 1~: 19:0:, 20 1:, Pag e 1 1D:eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1VJypl12-DCgF9B4o_D?qar9QIDg16VVY;A BSdJ M5F KBKr1 Eyp DpK Lrttfin Truss Company, Winsted , MN , Dallas Yurek -1-0-0 0-0-0 4-4-1 8-5-10 12 .00 1/5x4 6 ;,', d i.. 18 17 15 3 4X8 5 W2 w, Bi 14 3x4 s.oo ; 12 o~~ 0-5 -10 J-0-.0 Plate Qffsets (X 5')-· [~:0-6-:4 ,0-1-1~]. [7:-0~6-4.f1-1 2J . LOADING (psi) TCLL 35.0 (Roof Snow=35.0) TCDL 10 .0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL 10 .0 LUMBER· SPACING-2-0 -0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 Lumber OOL 1 .15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2X4 DF-N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF·N No. 1/No.2 WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud CSI . TC 0.80 BC 0 .85 WB 0 .81 (Matrix-M) W3 13-0-0 17-6-6 ~,e~w. ;_ 4xa 6 7 7 T2 <-!I W4 ·v ,;3 ,'· ~-..:..: W2 13 6x6 ,. ..__. 12 3x4 13-0-0 17-6-6 ~6;g.:Q DEFL. In Vert(LL) ·0,20 Vert(TL) -0.35 Horz(TL) 0 .39 BRACING- w, ·B.1 (foe) 13 13 10 21-7-15 26-0-0 27-0-0 1 .5x4 8 T1 1/defl Lid >999 240 >904 180 nla n/a 9 24 3X5 20 _.. 1 o.'? t-1'{v1 2q -~1 2119 ° sxs :' 26-0-0 1 -0-0 PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 Weight: 120 lb FT= 20% TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 2·2-1 oc purlins, except 2-0-0 oc purlins (3-7-1 O max.): 5-7. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . Scale = 1 :66 .6 SLIDER Left 2X4 DF or SPF Std or Stud 2-5-8, Right 2x4 DF or SPF Std or Stud 2-5-8 MiTekrecom me-nds' that Stabiiizers and rti'quired c ross bracing be installed during truss : . erect[o_[!, iQ_ ac_co rda_l)_c_e Yfith §_t_abllizer fnsta.fl atig_n_gulde_._ REACTIONS . (lb/size) 2=1520/0-3-8 (min . 0-1-8), 10=1520/0-3-8 (min . 0-1-8) Max Horz2=-181(LC 10) Max Uplirt2=-26(LC 12). 10=-26(LC 13) FORCES . (lb) • Max. Comp./Max . Ten .· All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-16=-643/0, 3-16=-617/0, 3-23=-2468/100, 4-23=-2431/118, 4-5=-2186172, 5-6=-2519/22, 6-7=-2519/22, 7 -8=-2186/37, 8-24=-2431/70, 9-24=-2468/51 , 9-20=-617/0, 10-20=-643/0 BOT CHORD 15-17=-160/552, 14-17=-142/1784, 13-14=-61/1610, 12-13=0/1610, 12-21=0/1784, 19 -21=-11/525 WEBS 5-14=-25/297, 5-13=0/1349, 6-13=-416/97, 7-13=-110/1349, 7-12=-32/297, 2-15=-849/0, 17-18=-342/162, 2-18=0/496, 15-18=-952/60, 3-18=·2077/159, 10-19=-849/0, 21·22=-342/130, 10·22=0/496, 19-22=-952/56, 9-22=-2077/132 NOTES· (11-13) 1) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6 .0psf; BCDL=6 .0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II ; Exp B ; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) -1-0 -0 to 2-0-0, lnterior(1) 2-0-0 to 8-5-10, Exterior(2) 8-5-1 Oto 21-9-15, lnterior(1) 21-9-15 to 27-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber D0L=1.60 plate grip DOL=1 .60 2) TCLL: ASCE 7-10 ; Pf=35 .0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp .; Ct= 1 3i This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 4) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 12.0 psf or 1 .00 times flat roof load of 35.0 psf on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads. 5) Provide adequate d rainage to prevent water ponding. 6) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other five loads. 7i Bearing at joint(s) 2, 1 O considers parallel to grain value using ANSI/TPI 1 angle to grain formula . Building designer should verify capacity of bearing surface 8) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 2, 10. &Ji~~cf'lliiflp?ii1Ji!1~reaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss . Job Truss ROOF ,A1 Lrttfin Truss Company, ·Winsted, MN , Da llas Yurek NOTES-(11-13) Truss Type 'Piggyback Base 10) Graphical pur1in representation does not depict the size or the orientation of the purlin along the top and/or bottom chord . ·Ol y 2 Ply _Jo_l>. f3'!f.!!r~r:i<;e. iop_tiQIJ.~) . • 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTek Industries , Inc. Mor Aug 10 14 : 1S.05 2015 Page 2 10:eHeVEiAyCT A5e2Wo3u_ 1VJypl12-DCgF9B4o_D?qar9QIOg , 6WYj.4BS dJM5 FK8Kr1 Eyp0pK 11) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 12) it is the respons ibility of the engineer or record to de termine the suitability of this component fo r this project per ANSI/TPI 1, Section 2. 13) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggybac k truss connect ion de ta il for base to cap lr uss conne cti ons . LOAD CASE(S) Standard Job . ROOF Truss .A2 Truss Type • PIGGYBACK BASE biy 14 Pi)' Littfin Truss Company , Winsted, MN,'Oallas Yurek Job Reference (optional) · · ···· 7.630 s Ju( 9 2015 Mile~ lndus1r;es, Inc . Mon Aug 10 14:13:16 2015 Page 1 1D:eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1VJypl12-0JqPSxDi0c0GPXVXR 1 Mc3qVcMcCAOKntsOUww6ypOp9 0 0 6 LOADING (psf) SPACING -TCLL 35 .0 Plate Grip DOL (Roof Snow=35.0) Lumber DOL TCDL 10.0 Rep Stress Iner -1-0-0 0-0-0 12 .00 : 1f.sx4 3x5 22 3 19-iW1 2 / 21 20 18 o~§ 1-0-0 -- 2-0-0 1.15 1.15 YES ,. BCLL 0.0 Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 BCDL 10,0 LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No . 1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 WEBS 2X3 SPF Stud 4-4-1 8-5-10 4x6 5 'N3 W2 \11/1 ·B l 13 3x4 5.00 ·12 8-5-10 CSI. TC 0.80 BC 0.85 WB 0 .82 (Matrix-M) 13-0-0 1.5x4 .. 6 .:-r2 W4 .,. 12 6x8 13-0-0 _25-0-0 17-6-6 4x8 7 :__:; \"/3 W2 11 3x4 · 17-6-6 DEFL. in Vert(LL) -0 .20 Vert{TL) -0 .34 Horz(TL) 0.39 BRACING- W 1 61 (loc) 12 12 10 21-7-15 26-0-0 1.5x4 8 T3 23 1/defl Lid >999 240 >907 180 n/a n/a 3X5 9 15 0 H\IVo-.. ";It ,·. 0 161-l 6X8 ' 26-0-0 PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 Weight: 11 e lb FT= 20% TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 2-2-0 oc purlins, except 2-0 -0 oc purlins (3-7-8 max.): 5-7 . BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . Scale= 1 :66 .6 SLIDER Left 2x4 DF or SPF Std or Stud 2-5-8, Right 2x4 DF or SPF Std or Stud 2-5-8 ! MiTek recoiiimeriiis tiiai'StabilTzers and req uired cross bracing be installed during truss ~re~tioQ , ir,_ c1ccordc111<::~ w.tth $\~l)jlizer J~t!Qn guid_e . REACTIONS. (lb/size) 10=1428/0-3-8 (min . 0-1-8), 2=1522/0-3-8 (min . 0-1-8) Max Horz 2=175(LC 9) Max Upllft10=-12(LC 13), 2=-26(LC 12) FORCES . (lb) • Max. Comp./Mex. Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . TOP CHORD 2-19=-643/0 , 3-19=-617/0 , 3-22=-2471/110, 4-22=-2434/129, 4-5=-2190/83, 5-6=-2525/47, 6-7=-2525/47, 7 -8=-2185/66, 8-23=-2381/94 , 9-23=-2481/77, 9-15=-634/0, 10-15=-696/0 BOT CHORD 18-20=-168/542, 13-20=-155/1767 , 12-13=-75/1612, 11-12=0/1616, 11-16=-17/1800, 14-16=-26/555 WEBS 5-13=-24/297, 5-12=0/1353, 6-12=-416/97 , 7-12=-118/1349, 7-11=-32/299 , 10-14=-756/0, 16-17=-350/154, 10-17=0/470, 14-17=-943/78, 9-17=-2008/144 , 2-18=-850/0, 20-21 =-343/166, 2-21=0/496, 18-21=-953162, 3-21=-2080/169 NOTES-(11-13) 1) Wind: ASCE 7-1 O; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=S .Opsf; BCDL=S .Opst, h=23ft ; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) -1-0-0 to 2-0-0, lnterior(1) 2-0-0 10 8-5-10, Exterior(2) 8-5-10 to 21-9-15, lnterior(1) 21 -9-15 to 26-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown : Lumber DOL=1 .60 plate grip D0L=1.60 2) TCLL: ASCE i -1.0: Pf=35 .0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II ; Exp B; Partially Exp .: Ct= 1 3) Thl s tmss has been checked for un iform snow load only , except as noted . 4) Th is truss has bee n designed for greater of min roof live load of 12 .0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 35 .0 psf on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads . 5) Provi de adequate ·drainage to prevent water pond ing . 6) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 7) Bearing at joint(s) 1 O, 2 considers parallel to grain value using ANSI/TPI 1 angle to grain formula . Building designer should verify capacity of bearing surface . 8) Prov ide mechanical connection (by olhers) of truss to bearing plate capable ofwithslanding 100 lb uplift at jo lnt (s) 10, 2. c51~~mcfi!l,i,dpW1fiP~reaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. Job Truss Truss Type ROOF A2 . PIGGYBACK BASE Utfin Truss Company, Winsted. MN, Dallas Yurek NOTES-(11-13) 10) Graphical pur1in representation does not depict the size or the orientation of 1he purlin along the top andfor bottom chord . Qty 14 Ply , J.11!>.~~J~re_l)~ {Qe!iQri.a.t) . . . . . . . 7.630 s Jut 9 2015 Milek Industries, Inc. Mon Aug 10 14:19:16 2015 Page 2 1D:eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1 VJypl12-0JqPSxDiOcOGPXVXR1 Mc3qVcMcCAOKnlsOUww6ypDp9 11) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 12) It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSlfTPt 1, Section 2. 13) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S) Standard Job ROOF Truss A3 Truss Type ·GABLE Ply Job Reference toptional) . · ·7 .630 s Jul 9 2015 Milek Industries, Inc . Mon Aug 10 14 :19:24 2015 Page 1 Lllttin Truss Company, Winsted, MN, Dallas Yurek ID :eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wc3u_ 1 VJypl12-9sJRBgJjW307Mm63viWVNWqzNrx4Gyo2ieQMCeypDp1 -1-0-0 0-0-0 12 .00 12 0 c,o' ~ 3x5 4-4-1 8-5-10 4x8 5 13-0-0 6 ST11 -T2 - ST9 ST11 ~ 17-6-6 4x8 7 ST -Sr8 sf1 o . ,::, ST8 ST7 ; , 1 · ~ W3 ;, Wt. ,; W3 . ~t 6 STi2 .. ST1 2 '3x6 ·,. ST3 3x6 I :..:' 3 x6 WZ 4 :, Sii5 T~ .,, . 13 .... ~. 21 -7 -15 26-0-0 27-0-0 ST6 ST3 S'1'5 " 8 ,: .SJ4" ''W 1 '1°1 64 3X5 '7 ; 0) 63 ; :.,3xe?s 3 S!1 ST2 ST4 ; B1 ~ .. 3X6 ;: . 14 3X4 6x8 12 3x4 3}6 ST2 S:1 '8 1 3x5 LOADING (~SI) TCLL 35.0 (Rooi Snow=35 .0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL 19.9 LUMBER· 5&JW 1 2 ,. 56 57 55 o~~ SPACING· 2-0 -0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 Lumber DOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2X4 OF No .2 or 2X4 DF-N No.1/No .2 WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud 5.00 , 12 8-5-10 CSI. TC 0.80 BC 0 .85 WB 0 .81 (Matrix-M) 13-0-0 17-8-6 i s_:o:o ·-- DEFL in Vert(LL) -0.20 Vert{TL) -0 .35 Horz{TL) 0 .39 BRACING· (loc) I/dell 13 >999 13 >904 10 n/a Lid 240 180 n/a 26-0-0 -,.o-o PLATES GRIP MT20 197 ii 44 Weight: 167 lb FT = 20% TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 2-2-1 oc purlins, except 2-0-0 oc purlins (3-7-10 max.): 5-7. BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0·0 oc bracing. Scale = 1 :66 .6 OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud SLIDER Lett 2x4 OF or SPF Std or Stud 2-5-8, Righi 2x4 OF or SPF Std or Stud 2-5-8 , ·rvii''i'ei<-recorrimendst fiat siabilize'is and required cross.iiracing·ce 1ristaliec1 ·duri ng truss · en~<:_~Qn... in a_ccori:l_a~ce _with _Stat!ili~er (~$tallatlC>n guid.~ .. REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2=1520/0·3-8 (min. 0-1-8), 10:a1520/0-3-8 (min. 0-1-B) Max Horz 2=181 (LC 11) Max Upllft2=·26(LC 12), 10=-26(LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Max . Comp./Max. Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . TOP CHORD 2-56=-643/0, 3-56=-617/0, 3-63=-2468/100, 4-63=-2431/118, 4-5=-2186/72, 5-6=-2519/22, 6-7=-2519/22, 7-8=-2186/37, 8-64=-2431/70 , 9-64=-2468/51, 9-60=-617/0, 10-60=-643/0 BOT CHORD 55-57=-160/552, 14-57=-142/1784, 13-14=-61/1610, 12-13=0/1610, 12-61=0/1784, 59-61=-11/525 WEBS 5-14=-25/297, 5-13=0/1349, 6-13=-416/97, 7-13=-110/1349, 7-12=-32/297, 2-55=-849/0, 57-58=-342/162, 2-58=0/496, 55-58=-952/60 , 3-58=-2077/159, 10-59=-849/0, 61-62=-342/130, 10-62=0/496, 59-62=-952/56, 9-62=-2077/132 NOTES-(14-16) 1) Wind: ASCE 7-1 O; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V{IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6 .0psf; BCDL=S .Opsf; h=23ft; Cat . II ; Exp B: enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) -1-0 -0 to 2-0-0, lnterior(1) 2-0-0 to 8-5-1 o, Exterior(2) 8-5-1 o to 21-9-15, lnterlor(l) 21-9-15 to 27-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed: end vertical left and right exposed ;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown ; Lumber DOL=1 .60 plate grip DOL=1 .60 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only . For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard Industry Gable End Details as applicable , or consult qualified building designer as per ANSI/TPt 1 . 3) TCLL : ASCE 7-10; Pf=35.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp; Ct= 1 4) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 5) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 12 .0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 35 .0 psf on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads . 6) Provide adequate drainage to prevent water ponding. 7) All plates are 1.5x4 MT20 unless otherwise indicated . Continued on page 2 Job ROOF truss A3 Littfin Truss Company, Winsted, MN, Dallas Yurek NOTES· (14-16) 8) Gab le studs spaced at 1....1.0 oc . Truss Ty pe GABLE 9) This lruss has been designed for a 10 .0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. Qty 'Pl y Job R!!_lerence (o pt ccna)) 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MITek Industries. Inc. Mon Aug 1014"19 :2~ 201 5 Page 2 1D :eHe VE 1AyCTA5e2Wo3u _ 1 V JypJ12-SsJ?.agJjW307Mm63villWNWqzNrx4 Gyo 2i eOM Ceyp:J p I 10) gearing at joint(s ) 2 . 10 cons iders paralle l 10 gra in value us ing ANSI/TPI 1 angle to grain formula . Building designer should verify capacity of bearing surface . 11 ) Provide mechanical connecl ion (by others) of lruss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 2, 10. 12) "Semi-rigid pitchbreal:s including hee ls" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss . 13) Grapll ic31 purlln representation does not depict the size or the orientation or the purlin along the top and/or bottom chord . 14) 111is truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or grea ter than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 15) Jt is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determ in e the su itability of this component for this project per ANSlfTPI 1, Section 2. 16) for Piggyback condilions , see Piggybac k truss conneclior. detail for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S) standard Job Truss ROOF B Truss Type :coMMON SUPPORTED GAB Qty 1 Ply Littfin Tru'ss Company , Winsted , MN , Dallas Yurek -1-0-0 0-0-0 13-0-0 4x4 Jgb R~ference_ (9p!i.o_n~J) 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTe k Industries , Inc . Mon Aug 10 14:19:36 2015 Page 1 ID: eHeVE iAyCT A5e2Wo3u_ 1 VJypl 12-o92zf nSFhlvQoc 1 NcEjJt2KBRgEe4 W4pSVK _ cxypDor 26-0-0 27 -0-0 3x4 ·- Q.Q.Q 11 10 12 8.00 12 9 13 8 14 7 15 16 6 :r , s sTs sr s sas 17 4 ST6 ST7 . 1 ST7 ST6 · T,1 18 $T 1 -ST 4 ST5 ST5 ST4 ~-ST119 ST2 STJ ST3 SJ2 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 3x6 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 3x4 20 0 92d, c,i· • • 0 0 1-0 -0 -------··--·····-·· ___ . ______ ?-~-_o.q 26 ·0·0 -,.o.o LOADING (pst) TCLL 35.0 (Roof Snow=35 .D) TCDL 10 .0 BCLL 0 .0 BCDL 10 .0 LUMBER- SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 LumberDOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No .2 or 2x4 DF -N No .1/No.2 OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud CSI . TC 0.09 BC 0.03 WB 0 .22 (Matrix) DEFL. Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) BRACING - TOP CHORD BOT CHORD WEBS in (lac) I/dell Ud 0.00 20 nlr 120 0.00 20 n/r 120 0.01 20 nla nla Structural wood sheathin Rigid ceiling directly appl 1 Row at midpt LATES GRIP 1T20 1971144 Weight: 147 lb FT= 20 % ~ applied or 6-0 -0 oc purlins . l-0-0 oc bracing. Scale= 1 :57 6 .Milek· reco mmends tha, .:,,-.,c-,uLers and re qu ired cross bracing be installed during truss e~ection, in accor~an <;~ y.,!!_h Stabil izer lnst?llati?n. g_uid_e REACTIONS . All bearings 26-0-0 . (lb)· Max Horz 2=-178(LC 10) Max Uplift All upl ift 100 lb or less at joint(s) 2, 31 , 32, 34, 35 , 36, 37 . 38 , 39 , 28 , 27 , 26 , 25 , 24, 23, 22 Max Grav All reacti ons 250 lb or less at Jolnt(s) 2, 30 , 31, 32 , 34 , 35, 36 , 37 . 38, 39 , 29. 28, 27, 26 , 25 , 24 , 23 . 22, 20 FORCES. (lb) -Max . Comp./Max . Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . NOTES· (13-15) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-1 O; Vul t=114mph (3-second gust} V(IRC2012)=90mph: TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=6 .0psf: h=23ft; Cat . II ; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envel op e) automatic zone and C-C Corner(3) -1-0-0 to 2-0 -0, Exterior(2) 2-0 -0 to 13-0-0, Corner(3) 13·0·0 lo 16-0-0 zone : cantilever left and right exposed : end vertical le ft a nd ri ght exposed:C -C for membe rs and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown : Lumber D0L=1 .60 plate grip D0L=1 .60 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only . For studs ex posed to wind (normal to the face). see Standard Industry Gable End Deta ils as applicable , or con s ult qualified building designer as per ANSI/TPl 1. 3) TCLL : ASCE 7-10; Pf=35.0 psf (flat roof snow); Catego°ry 11 ; Exp B; Partially Ex p .; Ct= 1 4) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load on ly. except a s noted . 5) Th is truss has been designed for gr_eater of mi n roof live load of 16 .0 psf or 1.00 limes fiat roof load of 35 .0 psf on overhangs non -concurrent with other live loads 6) All plates a re 1.5x4 MT20 un less otherwis e ind icated . 7) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing . 8) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc . 9) Th is truss ha s been designe9 for a i 0 .0 ps f bottom chord li ve load nonconcurre nt with any other liv e loads. 10) Pro vi de mechan ica l conne ction (by others ) of lruss io bearing plate capable of withstand in g 100 lb upl ilt at jcint(s) 2, 31, 32 . 34 , 35 , 36, 37, 38, 39 . 28, 27. 26. 25 , 24. 23 , 22. i 1) Beveled pla te or sh im requ ire d to provide lull bear ing surface w ith truss chord at joint(s) 2. C~tit?&e'2l ·oi9iS,Rj!f~br eaks including 11eets" Member e nd fixity model was used in lhe anal ysi s and de!\ign .of this truss . Jo b Truss Truss Type ,Qty Ply ROOF COMMON SUPPORTED GAB 1 ' · · ·· 1_Jg9 R~!~renc:;e {5'E!iQl:l.aj) . Littfin Truss Company, Winsted , MN. Da llas Yurek 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MITek Industries , Inc . Mon Aug 10 14:19:36 2015 Page 2 ID :eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1 V Jypl 12-o92zf nSFhlvQoc1 NcE]Jt2KBRgEe4W4pSVK_ cxypOrn 13) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture , and moisture or lumber not to exceed 19 percent 14) It Is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSlrrPI 1, Section 2 . 15) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard JoD , Truss B1 Truss Type COMMON Oty 5 Ply ROOF Job Re!eren~e.(oplior.~I) . . . . . . . . _ __ . • 7.63D s Jul 9 2015 MiTek lndus!rie$, In c . Mon Aug 10 14 :19 .J o ~015 Page 1 1D:eHeVE iAyCTA5e2Wo3u _ 1 V Jypl 12·W5e il C aWr~pA ??8o16K vlG9 ~mg iV,~Q ?9Hm3!'/l'zMypDo h Littfin Truss Company, Winsted, MN , Dallas Yurek "'9 •N a, ' OJ en. • 1-0-0 0-0-0 17 12 11 4x4 0-0-0 i3 8 .00 12 1.5x4 81 6-5-1 w, 1-0·0 ___________ _ Plate Offs~ts_(X ,)').--[2 :Eqge,0-0-19], (B:°-:0·0,0-0_-101 LOADING (psf) TCLL 35 .0 (Root Snow=35.0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0 .0 El~DL 10.0. LUMBER• SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1. 15 Lumber DOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC20151TPl2007 TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No. 1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 -.. CSJ. TC 0.68 BC 0 .62 WB 0.43 (Matrix-M) 18 W2 10 9 3x6 13-0-0 Sx4 4 !:, 'N2 19-5-15 26-0-0 27 -0-0 19 Wi '.:.! B2 B 4x4 17-4-0 1 .5x4 5 T1 20 15 :~;i 16 140 4X4 26-0-0 ___ -1._s-0:cr . -----·--------~±0 -· ~ DEFL. Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) BRACING· TOP CHORD BOT CHORD . - in (Joe) 1/defi Lid PLATES -0.09 10-13 >999 240 MT20 -0 .26 10-13 >999 180 0 .05 6 nla n/a Weight: 103 lb Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 2-2-0 oc purlins . Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . Scale = 1 :69. 9 GRIP 197/144 FT= 20% WEBS 2x3 SPF Stud MiTel< r e co mmends th at Stabilizers and required cross bracing be installed dunng truss :~rec..\!fln_. in ~cco1d~~'1 ~ith ?taQlliZ~r Lnsta_ll_3-tior.i 9!J_i_Qe REACTIONS. (lb/size) 2=1520/0-5-8 (min. 0-1-10), 6=1520/0-5·8 (min . 0·1-10) Max Horz2=·178(LC 10) Max Uplift2=-27(LC 12), 6=-27(LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max. Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2·12=-542/0, 12-17=-2079/18, 3-17=-1798/51, 3-18=-1832/94, 4-18=-1654/114, 4-19=-1654/114, 5-19=-1832/95, 5-20=-1798151, 15-20=-2078/18, 6-15=-542/0 BOT CHORD 11 -13=-147/480, 10·13=-64/1811 , 9-10=0/1059 , 8-9=0/1059, 8-16=0/1611 , 14·16=-60/453 WEBS 4-B=-71/722, 5-8=-525/184, 4·10=-71/722, 3·10=-525/184, 2-11=-653/0 , 12·13=-402/242, 11-12=-691/0, 2-13=.0/379 , 6-14=-653/0, 15-16=-402/234 , 14-15=-691/0, 6-16=0/379 NOTES· (8-10) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=6 Opsf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed: MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2)-1·0-0 to 2-0-0, lnterior(1) 2-0-0 to 13-0-0, Exterior(2) 13-0-0 to 16-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions.shown; Lumber D0L=1.60 plate grip D0L=1 .60 2) TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pf=35.0 psi (fiat roof snow): Category II; Exp B: Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 3) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted. 4) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 16.0 psf or 1.00 times tlat roof load of :;s.o psf on overhangs non-concurrent with other live loads. 5) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psi bottom chord live load non concurrent with any other live loads . 6) Provide mechanical connection (by others) o f truss to bearing plate capable o f withstanding 100 lb uplift atjoint(s) 2, 6. 7) "Semi-rig id pitch breaks Including heels" Mem ber end fix ity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss . 8) Th is truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 perceni moisture , and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 9) It is the responsibility .of the eng ineer of record to determine the su itability of this component for th is project per ANSI/TPI 1, Section 2 crntfrftflci~YBiili~ ~nditions . see PiggybacK truss connection detail for base to cap iruss connecti on s Job · ROOF Truss 82 Truss Type Ply ROOF SPECIAL GIRDER Ltttfin Truss Company, Winsted , MN, Dallas Yurek ? : Job Rerer<!n_ce (optional) 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTek Industries , Inc . Mon Aug 10 14:20:02 2015 Page 1 ID :e HeVEiAyCT A5e2Wo3u_ 1 V Jypl 12-2Aco6gmZZkBkwcON7hBPwXPZX9z5A 77eRYd MXRypDoR 0-0-0 13 10 0 J:, 0 :·: 9 17 6xi6 0-0-0 Plate Of1sets (X, Y)-· [6:0-~·0,0-6-0). [S :0-3-0,0-8-0J. LOADING (psf) TCLL 35 .0 (Roof Snow=35.0) TCDL 10 .0 BCLL 0 .0 BC[)L 10 .0 LUMBER· SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 Lumber DOL 1 .15 Rep Stress Iner NO Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 6-6-1 8.00 12 14 2x4 2 T1 13-0-0 6x10 MT18H 3 15 19-5-15 26 -0-0 2x4 ~ -T 1 -W2 W2 ·~ w; B1 i_··-L 18 19 CSI . TC 0.43 BC 0 .59 WB 0.88 (Matrix-M) 820 7 8x8 21 16 W1 12 I :. . ~ 50 ____ 6 2 J:, c:', 22 23 6 24 25 26 2711 , 12x16 : 6X16 17-3-15 26-0-0 DEFL . Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) in (lac) 1/defl Lid -0.21 6-8 ,-999 240 -0 .39 6-8 >-787 160 0. 07 5 n/a nla PLATES MT20 MT18H Weight: 394 lb TOP CHORD 2x6 DF 1800F 1 .6E or 2x6 DF-N 1800F 1.6E BOT CHORD 2X10 SP 2400F 2.0E BRACING- TOPCHORD BOT CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 4-10-7 oc purlins . Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . WEBS 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No. 1/No.2 "Except• W1: 2x3 SPF Stud REACTIONS. {lb/size) 1=9854/0-5-8 {min . 0-4-1), 5=9854/0-5-8 {min. 0-4-1) Max Horz 1=162(LC 30) Max Uplift1=-159(LC 12), 5=-159{LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max. Ten. -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . TOP CHORD 1-10=-12986/159, 10-13=-13740/236, 2-13=-13666/257, 2-14=-13552/289, 3-14=-13372/310, 3-15=-13372/310, 4-15=-13552/289, 4-16=-13666/257, 12-16=-13740/236, 5-12=-12986/159 BOT CHORD 1-9=-224/10427, 9-17=·239/11416, 17-18=-239/11416, 18-19=-239111416, 19-20=-239/11416, 8-20=-239/11416, 7-8=-70/7520, 7-21=-7017520, 21-22=-7017520, 22-23=-7017520, 6-23=-7017520 , 6-24=-142111416 , 24-25=-142111416, 25-26=-142111416, 26-27=-142/11416, 11-27=-142/11416, 5-11=-127/10427 WEBS 3-6=-18517988, 4-6=-556/175, 3-8=-185/7988, 2-8~556/175, 9-10=-324/230, 11-12=-323/229 NOTES-(11-13) 1) 2-ply truss to be connected together with 1 Od (0 . 120"x3") nails as follows: Top chords connected as follows: 2x6 -2 rows staggered at 0-7-0 oc. Bottom chords connected as follows: 2x1 o -2 rows staggered at 0-9-0 oc. Webs connected as follows : 2x4 -1 row at 0-9-0 oc, 2x3 -1 row at 0-9-0 oc. 2) All loads are considered eq ually applied to all plies, except if noted as front (F) or back (B) face in the LOAD CASE(S) section . Ply to ply connections have been provided to distribute only loads noted as {F) or (B), unless o\herHise indicated . 3) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=E .Opsf; BCDL=6 .0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed ; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) 0-2-12 to 3-2-12. lnterior{1) 3-2-12 to 13-0-0, Exterior(2) 13-0-0 to 16-0-0 zone; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown ; Lumber D0L=1.60 plate grip DOL=1 .60 41 TCLL: ASCE 7-10; Pf=35.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 C6nt1nued on page 2 GRIP 1971144 2201195 FT= 20% Scale = 1 :73 .6 ROOF :truss 82 Littfin Truss Company, Winsled, MN, Dallas Yurek NOTES-(11-13) Truss Type ROOF SPECIAL GIRDER 5) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 6) All plates are MT20 plates unless otherwise indicated. 7) This truss hils been desig ned for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. Qt y Ply 2 ~ob 13er~re.!'c.~ (9P./J£naQ - 7.63 0 s Jul 9 2015 MiTek lndustnes, Inc. Mon Aug 10 14:20:03 2015 Page 2 ID :eHeVEiAyCT A5e2\No3u_ 1 V Jypl 12 -WMAAKOnBK2JbXlbZhOieTlykHZJKvaMogC Nw3lypDoO 8) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 tb uplift at joint(s) except Ut=lb) 1=159 , 5=" 59 . 9) "Semi-rigid pilchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of th is truss . 10) Hanger(s) or other connection device{s) shall be provided sufficienl to support concentrated load(s) 140B lb down and 32 lb up at 2-0-0, 1-108 lb down and 32 lb up at •\-0-0 , 1408 lb down and 32 lb up al 6-0-0 , 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at 8-0-0. 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at 10-0-0. 1408 lb down and 32 lb up al 12-0-0 , 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at ·1~-0-0. 1408 lb down and 32 lb up al 16-0-0 . 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at 16-0-0 , 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at 20.0-0. and 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at 22-0-0, and 1408 lb down and 32 lb up at 24-0-0 on bottom chord . The design/se!ectio·n of su ch connection device(s) is the responsibility or others. 11) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and mo isture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 12) It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitabili~f of this component for this project per ANSlrrPI 1, Section 2 . 13) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections. LOAD CASE(S) Standard 1) Dead+ Snow (balanced): Lumber lncrease=1 .15, Plate lncrease=1 .15 Uniform Loads (plf) Vert: 1-3=-90, 3-5=-90, 1-5=-20 Concentrated Loads {lb) Vert: 7=-1408 17=-1408 18=·1408 19=-1408 20=-1408 21=-1408 22=-1408 23=·1408 24=·1408 25=-1408 26=-1408 27=-1408 Job • Truss ROOF p Truss Type GABLE Qty 16 Ply Littfin Truss Company, Winsted, MN, Dallas Yurek 0-0-0 4-6-6 4x4 Jo)> Refe.-en ce (cp1io.nal) 7,630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTe k Industri es, Inc . Mon Aug 1014:20:07 2015 Page 1 1D:eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1VJypl12-07Qh9NqhNGp10NvKwEnadb6PoAnFr2iNbql7CeypDoM 9-0-12 0 ,... ,... 0 Plate ·offsets (X. Y)-iH-2-5.0-1-0), [4 :_0·2:6,0 -1 :OJ LOADING (psi) TCLL 35.0 (Roof Snow=35.0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0.0 BCDL _ 10 .0 LUMBER- SPACING -2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 LumberDOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015fTPl2007 TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No .2 BOT CHORD 2X4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 12.00 12 2 2x4 0-0-0 T1 CSI. TC 0.40 BC 0.14 WB 0.09 {Matrix) 3 I ·, ST1 6 1 .5x4 DEFL. Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) BRACING- TOP CHORD BOT CHORD T1 in (lac) -0.01 5 0.00 4 0.00 4 2x4 9-0 -12 Vdefl n/r n/r n/a lid 120 120 n/a 0 ,... .,... ' 0 0 LATES IT20 Velght: 31 lb Structural wood sheathing directly appl lec O oc purlins Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . !IP 7/144 FT= 20% Scale= 1 :36 .4 OTHERS 2X3 SPF Stud MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cro ss bracing be installed during truss , ereclion ,.in accordance with Sta9!li?er lnstalla\ion guide . REACTIONS. {lb/size) 2=331/7-11-2 (min . 0-1-8), 4=331/7-11-2 {min . 0-1-8). 6=27517-11-2 (min . 0-1-B) Max Horz 2=-82(LC 1 O) Max Up lif\2=-27(LC 13), 4=-31 (LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max. Ten .• All forces 250 {lb) or less except when shown . NOTES-(12-14) 1) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph ; TCDL:6 .0psf: BCDL=6 .0psf; h=23f\; Cat. II; Exp B: enclosed : MWFRS (envelope) au:omatlc zone and C-C Corner(3) 0-2-9 to 3-2-8, Exterlor(2) 3-2-8 to 4-6-6, Corner(3) 4-6-6 to 7-6-6 zone : cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and r ight exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown: Lumber D0L=1 .60 plate grip D0L=1 .60 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only . For studs exposed to wind {normal to the face). see Standard lndustiy Gable End Details as applicable , or consult qualified building designer as per ANSlfTPI 1. 3) TCLL : ASCE 7 -1 O; Pf=35 .0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp .; Ct= 1 4) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 5) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of 12 .0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 35.0 psf on overhangs non-concurrent wtth other live loads. 6) Gable requires con ti nuous bottom chord bearing . 7) Gable studs spaced at 4-0-0 oc. 8) Thls truss has been des igned for a 10.0 ps i bottom cnord li ve load nonconcurrent with any oth er live !omi s. 9) Provi de mechan ica l co nnection (by et hers) of truss to bearing plate capab le of withs tand in g 100 lb l lplirt at joi nt (s) 2, 4 . 10 ) ''Sem i-rig id pitchb rea ks 111clud ing heels" Member end fi xity model was used in the analys is and des ign or this truss . 11 ) See Standard lndus tiy Piggyback Truss Connection Detail for Connection to base truss as appl icable . or consul: qualified building designer. 12) Th is truss mu st not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture. and mois ture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 13 ) It is the responsibili ty of the engineer of record to determ ine the s uitability or th is component for this project per ANS lfTPI 1, Section 2. da~.f,?JlcJW'~gg ~ ¥'nd itions . see Piggyback truss conn ect ion de :ail for !)a se to cap truss connections. Job :ROOF Truss ,P1 · Truss Type ·GABLE Qty 2 ,Ply Ltttfiri Truss Company , IJl!insted , Ml{ DifiiisYurek ----------JQ b P,efer~fg;Jqf~tr~)2015-~11Teklndusiiies , inc: i:1 cn Au°g"10 14 :20:122015 Page 2 ID :eHeVEiAyCTA5e2lNo3u_ 1 V Jypl12·15DaD5uqCpRJ7 8nl)nN1 KepM KB\foA. Vl/rf 6k62 uu sypDc H 12) Th is truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of umber not to exceed 19 percent 13) It Is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determ ine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSlfTP 1 , SecUon 2 . 14) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard Job ROOF truss :V Truss Type Valley Lijtfin Truss Company , Winsted, MN:Dallas Yurek . !Job ~eferen_cE! (optional) _ .. . _ 0-0-0 9-3-13 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MITek Industries, Inc. Mon Aug 10 14:20:16 2015 Page 1 ID :eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1VJypl12-esS52SxLG1y1bl53ydRhUU_zlostScAifl\061dypDoD 18-7-10 0.00 ,·12 1.5x4 9 10 ST1 4x4 3 h::1 I 1 . · cs::·~Ls x a··g a cx:x::.~~-- 3x4 0-0-0 8 1.5x4 7 1.5x4 11 1.5x4 ,1 4 ST1 6 1.5x4 Tl 12 5 3x4 18-7-10 ---cc:-,~~---· ----·----·--·-···------·· - ·-·--······--·--·---··----------18-7-10 --------·-------·-- Scale= 1 ;46.6 ---·-------------. ---··-·--· ···--.... ----. CSI. TC 0.38 BC 0.16 WB 0.20 LOADING (psi) SPACING• 2-0-0 TCLL 35 .0 (Roof snow=35 _o) Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TCDL 10 0 LumberDOL 1.15 (Matrix) BCLL o:o Rep Stress Iner YES BCDL ··-_ 10 .0 ____ -·· ___ C~~-NSR~-~~~/TPl200? .... ---------· LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No .2 or 2X4 DF-N No.1/No .2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No. 1/No.2 DEFL. Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) BRACING- TOPCHORD BOT CHORD in (loc) I/dell Ud PLATES n/a n/a 999 MT20 n/a nla 999 0.00 5 nla n/a Weight: 83 lb Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purllns . Rigid celling directly appfied or 10-0-0 cc bracing. GRIP 197/144 FT= 20% OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud . MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracing be installed during truss '_ erection, in .accordance with Stabilizer lnstallatlon _guide._ ... REACTIONS. All bearings 18-7-10. (lb)-Max Hort 1=-112(LC 10) Max Up li ft All up lift 100 lb or le ss a! jolnt(s} excep t 8=-105(LC 12), 6=-105(LC 13) Max Grav All reactions 250 lb or less at joint(s) except 1=253(LC 1 ), 5=253(LC 1), 7=256(LC 1), 8=591 (LC 1), 6=591 (LC 1) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp./Max . Ten . -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . WEBS 2-8=-469/159, 4-6=-469/159 NOTES-(8-10) 1) Wind : ASCE 7-1 O: Vul!=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph: TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=B .O psf; h=23ft; Cat. II ; Exp 5; enclosed ; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Ext erior(2} 0-5-12 to 3-5-12, lntericr(1) 3-5-12 to 9-3-13. Exterior(2) 9-3-13 to 12-3-13 zone : cantilever left and right exposed : end vertical left and right exposed:C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown ; Lumber DOL=1 .60 plate grip D0L=1 .60 2) TCLL : ASCE 7-10; Pr=35.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 3) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted. 4) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing . 5) This truss has been desig ned for a 10 .0 psi bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 6} Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capab!e of withstanding 105 lb uplift at joint 8 and 105 lb uplift at joint 6. 7) •·semi-rig id pitchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design or this truss. 8) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture or lumber not to exceed 19 percent 9) It Is the responsiblllty or the engineer of record to determine the suitability of lhis component for this project per ANSI/TPI 1, Section 2. 10) For Piggyback conditions. see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard Job ROOF V1 . truss Type .. Valley . }Ply Ltttfin Truss Company, \tvin sied, MN, Dallas Yurii li : J<>_b_ Refe~ri<ee_(9p!(o_!:1 ~D--·--·-..... __ .. ... . . _ -· .. 0-9-0 6-3-13 4x4 .: 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MiTek lndushies, Inc . Mon Aug 10 14:20:19 2015 Page 1 ID:eHeVEiA yCT A5e2Wo3u_ 1 V Jypl 12-2R8 EhU _DZyKKSDpedm?067 cV\IIOuYl?FSLhF meyypDoA 12-7-10 1.5)(4 :, 2 Q ~T-1 3 I, STQ 10 n 1.5x4 :1 4 5 . 1 .. .-:·. ~~--. -· --________ :;L____ __. ___ .-;. ______ .''-:::: I • ~ 1" c. 81 · ' . YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYS 3x4 0-0-0 8 1.5x4 i ' 7 1.5X4 I , 6 1.5x4 :1 -·--···-·· 3x4 12-7-10 ------. 12-7-10 ------------------ Scale = 1 :32 .5 ----·-· ···--··--. ·--··---·---·· ··----·-. --····------ LOADING (psi) TCLL 35 .0 (Roof Snow=35.0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0.0 SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 Lumber DOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 CS!. TC 0.21 BC 0.11 WB 0.12 (Matrix) DEFL . Vert(LL) Vert(TL) Horz(TL) in nta n/a 0.00 (foe) 5 1/defl Lid PLATES GRIP n/a 999 MT20 197/144 n/a 999 n/a n/a I Weight: 40 lb FT= 20% . BCDL ____ . 10.0 ....... . --·-·----··-· . -------'----· -·--···--------········---- LUMBER- TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No .2 or 2x4 DF-N No .1/No.2 OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud REACTIONS. All bearings 12-7-10 . (lb). Max Horz 1=-74(LC 10) Max Uplift All uplift 100 lb or less at joint(s) 1. 5, 8, 6 BRACING· TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Max Grav All reactions 250 lb or less at Joint(s) 1. 5 except 7=324(LC 1 ). 8=399(LC 1), 6=399(LC 1) FORCES . (lb) -Max. Comp ./Max . Ten .• All rorces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . WEBS 2-B=-335/119. 4-6=-335/119 NOTES-(8-10) Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purllns. Rigid celling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. i MITek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross bracing be Installed during truss i . erectlon ,.in accordance with Stabilizer lnstallation _guide._ _ _ _____ ··--_______ .• __ _ 1) Wind: ASCE 7-1 o; Vult=114mph (3-second gust) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6.0psf; BCDL=6.0psf; h=23ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) 0-5-12 to 3-5-12, lnterior(1) 3-5-12 to 6-3-13, Exterior(2) 6-3-13 to 9-3-13 zone ; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactio11s shown ; Lumber DOL=1 .S0 pla te grip DOL=1 .60 2) TCLL : ASCE 7-10; Pf=35 .0 psi (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp.; Ct= 1 3) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 4) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing . 5) This truss has been designed for a 10 .0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 6) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 1 oo lb uplift at joint(s) 1, 5 , 8, s. 7) "Semi-rigid pitch breaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. 8) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture. and moisture of lumber not to exceed 19 percent 9) II is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component for this project per ANSlfTPI 1, Section 2. 10) For Piggyback conditions, see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard Job ROOF V2 Truss Type .valley 'Qty '1 1 ' _ I Job Refer~'lC.~.(op_tional) .. . __ _ ... ___ .. _. . ... Lrttfin Triiss Company;-wirisied, fi,;Coaflas Yurek . - 0-0 -0 3-3-13 4x4 7.630 s Jul 9 2015 MITek lndus1ries, Inc . Mon Aug 10 14:20:35 2015 Page 1 1D :eHeVEiAyCTA5e2Wo3u_ 1 VJypl12-alM3H2yAFntL2Ng2)Z:7HBmVGGzSMrPF9V1 B7c80yp0nw 6-7-10 LOADING (psf) TCLL 35 .0 (Roof Snow=35 .0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0.0 BCD_l __ 1_(!.0 LUMBER- SPACING-2-0-0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 LumberDOL 1.15 Rep Stress Iner YES Code MNSRC2015/TPl2007 TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF•N No.1/No.2 BOT CHORD 2x4 DF No.2 or 2x4 DF-N No.1/No.2 2 s.oo i i2 T1 T1 ST i 3 ... ·~;_;. __ , __ --------··--·-··-··-·--· '..::91 ~Y..s&56&5?..25?:Z9- 2X4 0-0 -0 4 1.5x4 I: 2x4 6-7-10 ___ -···-··-·· -·-.. -----·-····· 6-7-fo---::__-: .... __ ,, _________ _ CSI. DEFL. in (Joe) 1/defl Lid TC 0.19 Vert(Ll) nta n/a 999 BC 0.07 Vert(TL) n/a n/a 999 WB 0.06 Horz(TL) 0.00 3 n/a n/a ·---. -·-------·-- PLATES GRIP MT20 197/144 (Matrix) Weight: 19 lb FT= 20% BRACING· TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 ac purllns. Rigid celling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing . Scale= 1:19 .0 . .. -~ --·· --··- OTHERS 2x3 SPF Stud ' MiTe k recommends that Stabilizers and required cress bracing be installed during truss REACTIONS. (lb/size) 1=186/6-7-10 (m in. 0-1-8), 3=186/6-7 -10 (min . 0-1-8), 4:::253/6-7-10 (min . 0-1 -8) Max Horz 1=36(LC 11) Max Uplirt1=-15(LC 12), 3=-19(LC 13) FORCES. (lb) -Max. Comp ./Max . Ten. -All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown . NOTES· (8-10) l erection, In accordance with Stab:llzer Installation gu ide . __ -· ..... ____ .... -----· 1) Wind : ASCE 7-1 O; Vult=114mph (3-second gu.st) V(IRC2012)=90mph; TCDL=6 .0psf; BCDL=6 .0pst. h=23ft; Cat. II ; Exp B; enclosed ; MWFRS (envelope) automatic zone and C-C Exterior(2) zone; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C far members and farces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber DOL=1.60 plate grip D0L=1 .60 2) TCLL : ASCE 7-10 ; Pf=35.0 psf (Oat roof snow); Category II; Exp B; Partially Exp .; Ct= 1 3) This truss has been checked for uniform snow load only, except as noted . 4) Gable requires continuous bottom chard bearing . 5) This truss has been designed for a 1 o.o psi bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads . 6) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable or withstanding 100 lb uplirt at joint(s) 1, 3. 7) "Semi-rigid pitch breaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used In the ana lysis and design of this truss . 8) This truss must not be exposed to environments that are corrosive or greater than 19 percent moisture, and moisture of lumber not ta exceed 19 percent 9) It Is the responsibility of the engineer of record to determine the suitability of this component far this project per ANSI/TPI 1, Section 2. 10) For Piggyback conditions , see Piggyback truss connection detail for base to cap truss connections . LOAD CASE(S) Standard City of Stillwater 216 N . 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 May 11, 2017 Stephen & Patricia Ogborn 7940 Neal Ave . N . Stillwater, MN 55082 Stephen & Patricia: A complaint has been lodged with the City regarding an incomplete structure on your property. A building permit was issued for this structure by Stillwater Township prior to annexation into the City of Stillwater, but that permit has now lapsed as a result of no apparent progress being made on the structure for a period of at least six months. Therefore, it will be necessary for you to apply for a building permit with the City of Stillwater and to bring the structure into compliance with the City Code. Please make application for a building permit within the next 30 days and begin work to bring the structure into compliance. If application is not made and found satisfactory by the City, the City take further action to ensure that the structure is brought into compliance with City Code . If you are unable to have the work completed yourself, please respond to this letter with an explanation as to why. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me during regular business hours via either phone or email. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Erik Olson-Williams Zoning Administrator/Assistant Planner City of Stillwater eolson-williams@ci.stillwater.mn.us 651-430-8818 EXHIBIT (, Ma·ureen Geier -··------------------------------------------- From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Patricia & Stephen, Erik Olson-Williams Monday, June 12, 2017 4:08 PM 'pogborn88@gmail.com'; 'stephenogborn@gmail.com' Abbi Wittman; Bill Turnblad; Cindy Shilts; Maureen Geier 7940 Neal Ave . Garage Perm itting Process 4893_001 .pdf Thank you for calling today. I apologize for not getting this information to you sooner. To be in compliance with City Code, the incomplete garage on your property must be completed, and a building permit from the City will be required to do so . However, the City will not able to issue a building permit for this project until a structural engineer has inspected the existing structure and made the determ i nation that it is structurally sound. I've attached a list of structural engineers you could contact for assistance in this matter. Please let me know if you have any additional questions . I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Thank you, Erik Olson -Williams Zoning Administrator/Assistant Planner City of Stillwater 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8818 No Permit -Building Department I llllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111 lllll 111111111111111111 B 3003020110005 7940 NEAL AVE N EXHIBIT Q Larson Engineering, Inc, 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 -5126 651.4B1 .9120 Fax : 651.4B1 .9201 www.larsonengr.com i Larson July 11, 2017 Mr. Steve Ogborn 7940 Neal Avenue North Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: qarage Evaluation 7940 Neal Avenue Stillwater, MN LEI Project No: 11170693 .000 Dear Steve: On June 23, 2017 I made a visual inspection of the garage structure at the above address. The garage was framed up and partially sheathed. There was no sheathing on the roof and the trusses and wall studs had been exposed to the weather for an extended period. Although the wood was quite weathered, I observed that the truss connecting plates were intact and in good condition and there was no decay in the wood. In my opinion, the trusses have not suffered a significant loss in structural integrity and should remain serviceable assuming the construction is completed relatively soon. Following are a few additional observations requiring structural attention: • The studs in the back wall of the garage must be continuous from the foundation to the ceiling. Presently the wall is "platform" framed creating a "hinge" in the middle of the wall . Please refer to the attached sketches. • Diagonal bracing should be installed where the stud walls meet the ceiling as shown in the attached sketch (Detail 1 ). • There should be a minimum of three (3) king studs on each side of the large door . Presently there is only one (1) king stud. • If the ceiling is not sheathed, the bottom chord of the trusses should be braced with 2 x 4's at 24" on center, nailed to each truss with (2) 16d nails. EXHIBIT E I h0rn by certify !h at th i!; pl~n. specllicatlon , or rep on wag prepared by me or under my dlrect'sup,arvislon Md that I am a duly Licensed Profeealonal Englnefir tinder the laws of the State of Minnesota . · Print Name: l--\ ~ 1..J A.'( \t-1 V "t \4 Sfgnatute: ll~ w . V p ±L. Date: 1-I I -17 ____ . --'· Llcem1, # l.£'Z.4.-1 • ,!;,),•," . ·.:.: ;, Mr. Steve Ogborn 7940 Neal Avenue July 11, 2017 Please review the attached sketches and give me a call with any questions. Sincerely, Larson Engineering, Inc. l1a, W -J .~ Henry W. Voth P.E. Principal enc i Larson 2of2 11170693 .000 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labore Road While Bear Lake, MN 55110-5126 651.481.9120 Fax: 651 .481 .9201 www.larsonengr.com i Larson · ( 3) \(\Wl.,. ( ~ (I \ Th\1"'1':'\~(~ :,coSU"-"B""'JE=Cc.:...T _-,~C).:_4....e....,:O~......;':.....:-J~'i..:..../~:....:·L=-----SHEET NO. l OF '1.. ----------------PROJECT NO. \ l \ "1 c'..)C:,O, 3 ----------------BY l~~, .... JJ PAJE 'I-IH1 _____ .... -----1 r-· ---....... , . ------··· ··, I I -P LA 1-.j 1 1 ,, -0 \5 I , :-i '.I lj Larson Engineering, Inc, 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110-5126 651.481.9120 Fax: 651.481.9201 www.larsonengr.com =SU=B=JE=C~T _1_0i_4_0 __ 1.j __ (;--".p.,_t.... _____ SHEET NO. '2..-. OF L ---------------PROJECT NO, I I l JO (;,")"3 ______________ BY\~\/ PAJE 0 l -! 1·0 ~ Larso n ,, ~ Z.x4e. 48 o. ~· C9 i _ t 'I-f::, e I ~ . c.. a i-i, '..s I , . ' Fou)-..l o ~·~......, : .. . .. . i I I I ADDRESS PIN LEGAL DESC PERMIT TYPE PROPERTY TYPE CONSTRUCTION TYPE VALUATION CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH 4TH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082- (651) 430-8825 FAX: (651) 430-8810 7940 NEAL A VEN 3003020110005 NIA LOT O BLOCK 0 BUILDING RESIDENTIAL -OTHER THAN NEW CONST. GARAGE DETACHED $47,505 .12 APPLICANT PERMIT FEE OGBORN STEPHEN A & PATRICIA J 7940 NEAL A VEN STILLWATER, MN 55082 PLAN REVIEW STATESURCHARGE(BLDG) LICENSE VERIFICATION ISSUED: 08/08/2017 EXPIRES: 02/04/2018 Permit#: 2017-00797 TOTAL 624 .05 405 .63 23.75 5.00 1,058.43 OWNER OGBORN STEPHEN A & PATRICIA J 7940 NEAL A VE N STILLWATER, MN 55082 AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT I hereby ce11ify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinanc~s governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. This permit becomes null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced . Signature of Applicant Date Payment(s) CHECK 6585 1,058.43 EXHIBIT £ B rammI11Ullllilllll lllll lllll lll1Ullillll *2017-00797* SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. (SjhY~ Building Inspection ") I JUL J 3 2017 I C IT Y OF STILLWATE ~1onc BUILD ING DEPARTM ENT BUILD ING PERMIT APPLICATION City of Stillwater 216 4th St re et North , Sti ll water MN 550 82 651-430-8825 Fa x: 651-430-8810 www .ci .stillwater.mn.u s INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE REJECTED PROJECT ADDRESS (INCLUDE SUITE NUMBER) :7 °) y O tJ ei:.. I Ave N .9-/, 11 \,./...fev f'/1/'YJATE. ___ 1,_-__;l;.._.':S.._-__,_I ,-'---_ PROPERTY OWNER/TENANT 5 ±ep h~ A i-f 0:"1v-1' '-' G-r 05 bo.,-v-. PHONE ft;s I L/3C/-lr'I $ (p STREET ___________________ CITV,STATE,ZIP ________________ _ CONTRACTOR NAME .s+~r ~e~ 05 bbvv-. PHONE~ ~ 12 5'J'1 G,og I STREET 7<:JJ L/ O N ~cJ Ave 'N s+; \ \ vJc"--h?v-/vi w CITY, STATE, ZIP s+~ I \ We,-k;..-fl\N ss-og1. .. APPLICANT'S NAME S :k f. h;t"'-A 05 hov-\1\ EMAIL ADDRESS Ste? ~~~3 bC?~v-..@ ~ ~"-; \ •C1:iiv-. LICENSE It NIA-LEAD CERTIFICAT ION 11 ____ .,_f/_,,/-'-!f:\..,_ ______ _ PROPERTY USE:· COMMERCIALD._RESIDENTIAL_D_ ~PE OF WORK (CHECIU2f'IE) NEw0ADD1T10NWREMODEL_Lj_REPA1RilMoVE...LlDEMOLISH D DECK/PORCH D SQFOOTCALCS: 1ST FLOOR / /qG:, 2ND FLOOR /V./1.J. ADDITIONAL STqRIE~_ /v /A i ,. I I, Dc+-c,h.a~ / FINISHED BASEMENT NIA UNFINISHED BASEMENT fV /A GARAGE .5 "-01::> ) • I _______________ t _________________________________________ _ VALUATION (LABOR & MATERIALS) . S'1) 3.:2. ~ ~ '-( 0 '' DESCRIPTION oFJOB (l!lm p }ek 8\,lJ f .,..°._)C L-+ $-i c-.A et.A u l--c{.e-..-·+o k.li-..$h,'p p:e't@v\ ,\- COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL-COMPLETE THIS BOX OCCUPANT LOAD _______ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ________ OCCUPANCV CLASSIFICATION ______ _ NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY (ALL PROPERTIES) -COMPLETE THIS BOX PARCEL ID# 30, o·so.10, i ,_ 0005 LOT ___ BLOCK __ _ TRACT--------------------------------------- Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilating and air conditioning. This permit becomes null and void If work or construction author- lzed Is not commenced with in 180 days, or If construction or work Is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at anytime after work Is commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provis ions of laws and ord inances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not . The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating constru cti on or the perform ance of construction . PRINT-ICANT'S NAME ,. A j}"'V'" DATE ,-Js-r7 APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (. ~tL..-( ~,._.. ./ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS OFFICE USE ONLY APPROVALS PLAN REVIEW YES _NO -ENG IN EER IN G WILL BE REJECTED SAC UNITS -PIJ\NNI NG4 U.1/).lJ---1.k!.~-- I I i .I i I /~/::,:. I F-' /~~-· I l.f... . /~· / / <' ::_ : ' . I .:: -v. . / . "-'''· I /j ·< / /; :. {.' J , / •• ' . ~-,. .. .. ' \ \. I I \ ... ~ 0 \ \ , . ._. --- qC\' \ . . -~ .....:. ··-:°S •{b .. .._ ---i ·- -----··- City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 February 13, 2018 Stephen & Patricia Ogborn 7940 Neal Ave . N . Stillwater, MN 55082 Stephen & Patricia: This is your second notice regarding an incomplete and noncompliant structure on your property . A building permit was issued for this structure by Stillwater Township in 2015 prior to annexation into the City of Stillwater, but that permit expired as a result of no progress being made on the structure for a period of at least six months. Therefore, a second permit (#2017-797) was issued by the City of Stillwater on July 27, 2017. Since the issuance of this second permit, however, numerous additional complaints about the structure have been received and no recorded progress or inspections have been made. Therefore, this permit has now expired for lack of progress. Therefore, please remove the structure to the slab or resume work bringing the structure into compliance within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If work is not resumed or the structure is not removed within this time, the City will take further action to ensure that the structure is brought into compliance with City Code. If you have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me at the phone number or email listed below. Sincerely, c.{~ Erik Olson-Williams Zoning Administrator/Assistant Planner City of Stillwater eolson-williams@ci.stillwater.mn .us 651-430-8818 EXHIBIT b ADDRESS : PIN : LEGALDESC : : PERMIT TYPE : PROPERTY TYPE : CONSTRUCTION TYPE : VALUATION : NOTE : 3/9/18 PERMIT REOPENED. CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH 4TH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082- (651) 430-8825 FAX: (651) 430-8810 7940 NEAL A VEN 3003020110005 NIA LOT 0 BLOCK 0 BUILDING RESIDENTIAL -OTHER THAN NEW CONST. GARAGE DETACHED $ 47,505 .12 ISSUED: 08/08/2017 EXPIRES: 02'04/2018 Permit#: 2017-00797 MUST SHOW RECORDED PROGRESS (FRAMING INSPECTION) WITHIN 30 DAYS TO KEEP PERMIT ACTIVE OR REMOVE PER 3/13/18 LETTER FROM ERIK OLSON-WILLIAMS . APPLICANT OGBORN STEPHEN A & PATRICIA J 7940 NEAL A VEN STILLWATER, MN 55082 OWNER OGBORN STEPHEN A & PATRICIA J 7940 NEAL A VEN STILLWATER, MN 55082 AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. This permit becomes null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. Si gnature of Applicant Date PERMIT FEE 624 .05 PLAN REVIEW 405.63 STATE SURCHARGE (BLDG) 23.75 LICENSE VERIFICATION 5.00 TOTAL 1,058.43 Payment(s) CHECK 6585 141706 1,058.43 EXHIBIT ti B IIIDIBlillll lllmHrlmtltllllfflJIII *2017-00797* SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. Permit#: 2017-00797 PIN: 3003020110005 Site Address: 7940 NEAL A VE N City of Stillwater Permit Inspection Report Applicant: OGBORN STEPHEN A & PATRICIA J Inspection Type Status Sched Date ROUGH-IN ELECTRICAL Open FRAMING Open FINAL ELECTRICAL Open FINAL Open 111 111 111 * 2 0 1 7 -0 0 7 9 7 * Time Insp Actual Date lnsp 7/25/2019 EXHIBIT ,.5{;ill wat er I B . ~~ ~---.,.. ........__ ' i ti E B I R 1 H P L A t: l: 0 f-M I ~~ N I: ~ 0 I A J Community Development Department DATE: August 13, 2019 SUBJECT: Impartially built garage is considered a hazardous building PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7940 Neal Avenue LANDOWNER: Stephen & Patricia Ogborn REPORT BY: Cindy Shilts, Building Official Graham Tait, City Zoning Administrator BACKGROUND The property of 7940 Neal Avenue was originally in Stillwater Township until that area was annexed in 2015, at which point this property was within the City of Stillwater. A building permit was issued for this structure by Stillwater Township in 2015 prior to annexation into the City of Stillwater. After being annexed into the City of Stillwater, the permit issued in Stillwater Township expired as a result of no progress being made on the structure for a period of at least six months . Therefore, a second permit (#2017-797) was issued by the City of Stillwater on July 27, 2017, after a structural engineer approved continuation of the project, as per the City of Stillwater's request. Proceeding the issuance of the second permit, numerous complaints about the structure were received and no recorded progress or inspections were been made. Therefor the City of Stillwater established contact with the owner, including a letter sent February 13, 2018, requesting the property owner either remove the garage or complete construction of the garage. Since this correspondence no progress has been made. FINDINGS The Community Development Department declares that the structure in question is a hazardous building based on the definition in Minnesota Building Code. -Minnesota State Statute "463 .15. Definitions. Subd. 3 . Hazardous building or hazardous property. Hazardous building or hazardous property means any building or property, which because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical damage, unsanitary condition, or abandonment, constitutes a fire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health." Due to inadequate maintenance and abandonment, the unfinished garage is a public safety hazard . The Community Development Department repeatedly receives call of residents complaining about young kids and teenagers playing and "hanging around" in and around this partially built structure. The structure, which sits at a prominent intersection, has large openings making it welcoming to 7940 Neal A venue August 13, 2019 Page 2 kids and teenagers to enter. Additionally, the exposed frame and the scaffolding present make it particularly welcoming for young people to use the structure as sort of a playground and climbing mechanism. Lastly , the structure poses a fire hazard, particularly to the unauthorized kids/teens using the space. The following are some of the complaints expressed to the city that constitute this structure being a health hazard: • Young kids and teenagers congregating there, especially at night. • Kids climbing the walls and scaffolding. • Teenagers smoking and using lighters inside the structure. In consideration of the City deeming this a hazardous building, this property is in violation of the following City Codes: -"Sec . 38-1. Subd. 2 . (2) ff. Improperly maintained or partially erected or demolished buildings not properly protected." -"Sec. 38-1. Subd. 2 . (2) i. Dangerous structures ." Lastly and very important to note , even though the structure is potentially not structurally hazardous as of now, leaving it unfinished and unprotected to the elements will continually further its diminishing structural integrity, inevitably leading to it becoming structurally hazardous as well. The City requested a structural engineer report be provided in order to assess the integrity of the structure. This report by Larson Engineering , dated July 11 , 2017 , stated "the trusses have not suffered a significant loss in structural integrity and should remain serviceable assuming the construction is completed relatively soon. However, that report was created over two years ago and the construction was not "completed relatively soon". Therefore, it is the City's belief that , even as soon as another winter of being exposed, the structure will not be structurally sound. TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Beth Wolf, City Clerk DATE: August 30, 2019 RE: 2019 Stillwater Harvest Fest Summer Tuesdays Inc. has made application for a Special Event Permit to host the Stillwater Harvest Fest on October 12th and 13th 2019 in North Lowell Park. The Harvest Festival will be open to the public on Saturday & Sunday from 10 am to 7 p.m. Set up begins at Noon on Friday, October 11th. Tear down will occur from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. on Sunday evening. All parking spots in Lots 5, 9 and 10 plus Mulberry Circle will be reserved all day Friday through Sunday. It is proposed Harvest Fest will have a beer tent with no fenci ng rather the ability to consume alcohol venue wide. Police officers will be on duty during the time of alcohol sales and consumption as well as for traffic control on Saturday and Sunday and the kiddie parade on Sunday. The Downtown Parking Commission reviewed the event and use of parking spaces. Lots 5 and 9 will be used for vendors. Lot 10 will be used for the pumpkin growers. Mulberry point will be blocked off for the entire event. A high water plan is in place moving activities to Lot 11 and using Water Street Inn private lot in addition to Lots 5, 9 and 10. The Organizer has requested a waiver of the base fee for both days and the load‐in fee (see attached email). Staff recommends Council only waive the base fee for one day to be consistent with previous requests from other Organizers. Fees for City services, materials and parking will be charged according to the 2019 Fee Schedule. The Organizer must provide the City insurance certificate, agency permits, coordination with Police, Fire, and Public Works by September 20, 2019. ACTION REQUIRED Council should review event application materials and request for fee waiver. If Council wishes to approve the event they should pass a motion approving the 2019 Harvest Fest Special Event Contract and Temporary Liquor License. Page 1 of 7 2019 STILLWATER HARVEST FEST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, between the CITY OF STILLWATER, Washington County, Minnesota (“City”), and SUMMER TUESDAYS, INC., a Minnesota non‐profit corporation, (“Organizer”) 1. Harvest Fest & Giant Pumpkin Weigh‐Off. The City has encouraged Harvest Fest & Giant Pumpkin Weigh‐Off (“Event”) in order to foster and promote tourism and encourage commerce that will ultimately increase property values and the quality of life within the City. 2. Dates and Hours of Event. Operations are limited as follows: Setup: Friday, October 11 – Noon – 6:00 p.m. Event: Saturday, October 12 – 10:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. Sunday, October 13 – 10:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. Cleanup: Sunday, October 13 – 6:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Load In/Load Out: Organizer will coordinate the Load In/Load Out times for the event with the Public Works Department by September 20, 2019. 3. Event/Alcohol. Harvest Fest has been granted conceptual authority to dispense intoxicating liquor at the Event. This approval is subject to the Organizer applying for and being granted a Temporary Liquor License and Consumption Permit as allowed by the Stillwater City Code and State Law. All Licenses must be a pproved and proof of Liquor Liability Insurance Coverage must be submitted to the City Clerk by September 20, 2019. This Agreement will set forth the terms and conditions that will control the dispensing of Liquor at the Event. The event will have a alcohol sales Saturday and Sunday from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. a. The Area. The area where dispensing of Liquor will be permitted in a contained area as advised by the Police Department. b. Fencing/Demarking of Venue. The Venue Area must be demarked by the Organization. The demarked area must be adequate to insure that alcohol sales and consumption remain inside the venue area. A breach of the venue area is grounds for the Police Chief to terminate all alcohol sales in the area. c. Tents. The Fire Department shall inspect all large tents (beer garden, etc.) d. Security. For the purpose of this plan, the Organizer shall increase the paid private security and/or increase the Stillwater Police presence to ensure that the alcohol stays with the venue area. The Police Chief will determine the increase in the Stillwater Police Department presence. A paid professional security guard/police personnel must be in place to insure that no beer or liquor enters or leaves the Area. e. Types. No Liquor is allowed in the Area except that Liquor which is sold by the Organization. The Organization is responsible to see that no other Liquor is brought in the Area. The Organization must not allow bottles, containers or coolers to be brought into the Area. Page 2 of 7 f. Signs. The entire venue MUST be posted with signs that state NO ALCOHOL BEYOND THIS POINT at regular intervals (50-75 feet apart); signs should be a minimum of 18 x 24 in. The number and content of which must be approved by the City Police Chief describing the regulations prohibiting Liquor outside of the Area, as well as prohibition against participants bringing their own Liquor into the Area and the requirement for identification bracelets must be worn to consume alcohol. g. Identification. The Organization will provide liquor identification bracelets. The Organization will permit no one to consume Liquor unless they are wearing an identification bracelet. The Organization will be responsible for the issuance of bracelets and that the bracelets are given only to those who are legally entitled to consume Liquor. h. Compliance. The Organization shall obtain a temporary liquor license for beer/wine tasting on Saturday, October 8 and also obtain an alcohol consumption permit for the same days with respective fees paid to the City. Prior to open ing date of the Stillwater Harvest Fest, the Organization must develop a management policy or program regarding all aspects of alcohol compliance, including the problem of under‐age consumer, sales after hours, over‐serving and the recognition of false identification. The City Police Chief must approve the policy before implementation. The Organization must train all alcohol servers with regard to the policy, including instruction by a professional recognized in the area of alcohol awareness before the opening date of the Event. i. Inspection. The Organization acknowledges that as a liquor license holder for the Celebration, it is subject to Stillwater City Code §43‐8, which authorizes that all premises from which intoxicating Liquor is offered at on‐sale, are subject to inspection for alcohol compliance by any police officer, health officer, or other designated officer or employee of the City during all hours the Area is open for the serving of alcohol. j. Liquor Liability Insurance. The Organization agrees to provide the City an insurance certificate for Liquor Liability during the event by September 20, 2019. 4. Trail. The bicycle and pedestrian trail from Laurel Street to Myrtle Street must remain open to the public and unobstructed during the Event unless approved by City Staff. 5. Noise Control. The Event is responsible to control the noise emanating from the Area at a level that will not interfere with the peace and repose of the residential area on the bluffs on the north, west and south edges of the downtown. 6. Police Power. The City reserves the right to order a shutdown of the Area in the event the Chief of Police determines, in his sole discretion, that the public safety is threatened or any condition of this Agreement is violated. If requested by the Chief of Police, the Organizer will assist the police in the clearing of the Area. 7. Security. Lessee shall confer with the Chief of Police as to the advisability of closing the Mulberry Street (Mulberry Point Circle) and shall hire any security personnel/police personnel the Stillwater Police Chief requires. Should the City have to hire outside agencies, the City will invoice the Organizer for any additional costs. Page 3 of 7 8. Use of Parking Lots. The organizer is aware and will inform all vendors and event participants that staking into the asphalt, etc. Is not allowed (any damage repair will be paid for by the organizer). The Event is given use of parking Lots 5, 9 and 10 and Mulberry Circle on Fri‐Sun. The Organizer agrees to pay the City for the use of the parking lot according to the parking space fees designated by the City Council. The City prefers the Association to stage the event in Lowell Park rather than in public parking lots. If Lowell Park is not flooded and is not recovering from flood waters, then it should be the primary event venue. Use of public parking lots will be approved only as an alternate or if sufficient space does not exist in the Park to accommodate all event activities. If in the opinion of the City, public parking lots will be needed, then the preferred lots for use would be Lots 5, 9, 10 and 11. These lots will be available to the Association exclusively from Friday AM until Monday AM of the Event weekend. 9. Event Fees. The Organizer agrees to submit event fees as stipulated in the 2019 Fee Schedule payable to City by September 20, 2019. The Organizer shall ensure that no vehicles drive on the City’s park property. In the event that damages occur to the City’s property, the Organizer shall pay for any restoration of the park as determined by the City. 10. Irrigation System in Park Property. Lowell Park is maintained by a buried irrigation system. This system cannot be damaged by stakes or posts that are driven into the ground or by equipment and vehicles running over irrigation heads. For that reason, stakes or posts longer than 12 inches and more than a quarter inch in diameter may not be used in the park. Public Works will provide irrigation locates in areas where tents will be staked on Friday, October 11, 2019. 11. City Costs. Organizer will prepay the City for the estimated costs of the City Police Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Department estimated as determined by the City Administrator for city services and materials, needed to safely conduct and maintain the Event or any supporting activities. The payment of estimated costs and costs incurred at the time of the billing (i.e., neighborhood meeting expenses and/or city equipment) shall be received by the City no later than September 20, 2019. Failure to make the payment will result in the cancellation of the Event. In the event of a cancellation of this Event after the deposit or fees are made, the City will be entitled to deduct actual out of pocket costs incurred in preparation for the Event, before returning the balance to Organizer. 12. City Services. The type and amount of materials needed for the Event will b e determined by the Public Works Superintendent. The Organizer shall be required to provide portable toilets to augment the existing facilities, barricades for street closure, trash removal and electricity for vendors. The Organizer may contact the City to arrange rental of materials and will be charged for use according to the City of Stillwater Event permit fee schedule. a. Portable Toilets. The Organization must furnish at least 8 portable restrooms, with hand sanitizing to facilitate expected crowds. Additional portable restrooms must be provided by the Event Organizer if deemed necessary to protect public health as determined by the Public Works Department. Page 4 of 7 b. City Public Restrooms. City Public Restrooms on the Pedestrian Walkway will remain open during the Event and the City will supply and equip the restroom, however, the Event Organizer will be responsible for maintaining, cleaning, security and supervision for the restrooms. If the Event Organizer does not have the manpower to maintain the public restrooms, the City will provide staffing or a contractor with the costs (overtime rate) to be invoiced to the Event Organizer. The City shall be notified 2 weeks in advance of the Organizer’s intent on maintaining the City restrooms. c. Barricade Placement. i. The City will place notices of parking lot closures 24 hours before October 11, 2019 and place notices of no parking for all on‐street parking requested in this agreement. ii. The Organizer shall place reflective standard barricades no later than 8:00 a.m. on October 11 at the parking lot entrances as designated by the Public Works Department. This will inform users of the parking lot closure for the Event. iii. To ensure traffic and pedestrian control the Association must place standard reflective barricades according to a plan approved by the Publi c Works Director, Police Chief or their designees. Barricades may be supplied by the Association, or by the City. Charges for the City supply of barricades are set forth in the current City Fee Schedule. The City may place additional traffic control barricades to protect public safety at City expense based upon a plan developed by the Public Works Director and Police Chief or their designees. The plan for placement of additional public safety traffic control barricades shall be shared with the Organizer by September 20, 2019. d. Trash Enclosures. The Organizer shall furnish dumpsters or roll‐off boxes and trash receptacles in sufficient quantity to contain the accumulation of trash generated by the Event. The Organizer shall make certain that all trash is picked up during and after Event daily. The Organizer shall remove any excessive garbage that does not fit within the receptacles and dispose in trash dumpsters. The City reserves the right to require additional receptacles should the Organizer not remove excess garbage from the Event. If possible, Organizer will provide recycling and organics containers for the Event. e. Electricity and Water. i. Each electrical box needed for the Event will be opened by the City on October 11, 2019. The Organizer shall be charged for the use of each electrical box according to the City fee schedule. ii. Organizer agrees to meet with the City and/or the State electrical inspector a minimum of 1 week prior to event to ensure all vendors using electrical service comply with the Minnesota Electrical Code. Inspection costs (if any) shall be the Event Organizer responsibility. iii. The City shall provide the Organizer a key for the water shut off valve. The Organizer shall provide a $50.00 deposit for such key and will be reimbursed upon return of said key. Page 5 of 7 f. Cleanup/Removal. Organizer shall remove all barricades, and portable toilets by 3:30 p.m. on the Monday following the event. Organizer shall remove trash, additional trash enclosures no later than Noon, Monday following Event. If the above items are not removed as stated above, the Organizer will reimburse the City for costs incurred in removing the items. 13. Vendors. NO CAMPING. The Organizer agrees to inform any vendors that there is no camping in Lowell Park or any City parking lots. a. The Organizer agrees that any vendor using cooking facilities will be inspected for safety by the Stillwater Fire Department and Washington County Public Health and Environment. Inspection costs (if any) shall be paid for by the Event Organizer directly to the agency/person doing the inspection. b. The Organizer agrees to ensure that all vendors waste water be discharged into a holding tank approved by Washington County Public Health and Environment. Vendors without an approved holding tank shall discharge into grey water barrels provided by the Organizer. Disposal costs are the responsibility of the Organizer. For no reason shall grey water barrels or holding tanks be disposed into the City’s Sanitary or Storm Systems. c. The Organizer agrees to provide 2 hand washing station to facilitate the expected crowds and vendors as deemed necessary to protect public health. 14. Other Agencies. Organizer is responsible for obtaining all agreements and permits with outside agencies (e.g. MnDOT, MN State Patrol, Washington County, Washington County Sheriff, MN Department of Natural Resources, Lakeview EMS, and any other agencies requiring permits for the event) and must submit copies of permits to the City from other agencies by September 20, 2019 15. Insurance, Hold Harmless, and Indemnity. The Organizer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City with regard to any claims, causes of action or demands that might be brought against the City arising out of the events authorized by this Agreement, except for those claims, causes of action or demands that arise out of the sole negligence, gross negligence and/or willful misconduct of the City or any of its agents or employees. Organizer also agrees to provide to the City evidence of insurance coverage of at least the statutory liability limits for municipalities covering claims that might be brought against the Organizer that arise out of the events authorized by this Agreement and to name the City as an additional insured on their policy "as their interest may appear." Insurance Certificate must be received by the City no later than September 20, 2019. The insurance protection will have the following limits: a. $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, and to name the city as an additional insured "as their interests may appear." b. Comprehensive Automobile Liability: i. Bodily Injury: $500,000 Each Person and $1,000,000 Each Occurrence ii. Property Damage: $100,000 Each Occurrence c. Worker's Compensation Coverage. Page 6 of 7 16. Event Application. The Event Application (not attached to Agreement) including revisions, correspondence, site plans and insurance for the Event as submitted by the Organizer is considered part of this Agreement. Any representations of the Organizer or conditions imposed by the City are restated as if fully set forth in this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands this 3rd day of September 2019. SUMMER TUESDAYS, INC. ______________________________________ Cory C. Buettner, President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) On this ____ day of ___________________ 2019, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, appeared Cory Buettner to me personally known, who, being duly sworn, did say that he is the President of Summer Tuesdays, Inc. and that this instrument was signed as the free act and deed of the corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public CITY OF STILLWATER ____________________________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) On this 3rd day of September 2019, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, appeared Ted Kozlowski and Beth Wolf, to me personally known, that they are, respectively, the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Stillwater, and that this instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of the City by authority of its City Council, and they acknowledged the said instrument was the free act and deed of the City. ____________________________________ Notary Public EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION RECEIVED JUN -5 2Dl9 City of Stilfwate r Adm inist ration THE IIITH,LACE Of IIIINIHSDTA 216 North 4th Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 Telephone: 651-430-8837 Fax: 651-430-8810 Incomplete applications or applications received after deadline will not be accepted. See Event Instructions for application deadline and fees. Date of Application : _J_un_e_4 _. 2_0_1_9 _______ _ Event Information Title/Name of Event Event Date/Time : Set up: Date Friday Oct 11 Actual Event: Date Sat & Sun, Oct 12 & 13 Clean up: Date Sunday, Oct 13 Location (Address} of Event: North Lowell Park (If in Lowell Park please specify north or south Lowell park) Office Use Onlv Date Application Received ------ Type: Event Special Event Event w/ Contract Time Noon to 6 pm Time 10 am to 7 pm Time 6 pm to 9 pm (Events after 10:00 p.m. require a variance from City Council Description of Event (please be specific -this information will be used to promote the event on the City of Stillwater website) Stillwater HarvestFest is home to one of the premier Giant Pumpkin Weigh-Offs in the world . Fun activities throughout the weekend for the entire family. The event kicks off with the Stairs of Stillwater and continues with live music, vendor market, Chili Cook-Off, Kiddie Tractor Pull, Beer and Wine, Giant Pumpkin Regatta (yes we make boats out of giant pumpkins). Each day, the event ends with a Giant Pumpkin Drop at 5 pm. Come for a Smashing good time! Estimated Attendance (participants and spectators): 500-1200 daily Applicant Information (Person/Group Responsible) Sponsoring Organization Name: Summer Tuesdays, Inc. Mailing Address: 101 Water Street South City, State, Zip Code: Stillwater, MN 55082 Primary Contact/Applicant Name: Cory Buettner Phone Number: 651 295-4725 Fax: na Cell Phone: (651) 295-4725 Email Address: CoryBuettner@gmail.com Website Address: HarvestFestStillwater.com Name of contact person during event: Cassie Mclemore Cell Phone: (651) 587-8970 Alternate contact during event: Chuck Dougherty Cell Phone: (612) 414-0865 Refer media or citizens inquires to: Cory Buettner Phone: 9651 ) 295-4 725 Site Plan: A site plan is mandatory for all events. Please provide a map of the site layout. Include any tables, stages, tents, fencing, portable restrooms, vendor booths, trash containers, etc. If event involves a parade, race or walk, please attach a route map highlighting route. Include rest stop stations, crossings, signage and indicate route direction with arrows. Event Features Will any signs/banners be put up No D Yes [ZJ Number and size : 6-8 in Lowell Park Will t~ere be any inflatables? No D Yes ~ Insurance certificate from rental vendor is required Will there be entertainment? No D Yes [ZJ What type : Live Music Fees for electricity may apply see Instructions Will sound amplification be used? No D Yes I&] Hours and Type: 10-7 Sat & Sun Will a stage or tent(s) be set up? No D Yes I&] Dimensions : Tent 40 x 80 Will there be temporary fencing? No D Yes I&] Will merchandise/food items be sold? No D Yes ~ How many 30 Merchandise Fees for electricity may vendors expected : 6-8 Food/ Snack apply see Instructions Will food be prepared on site? No D Yes I&] Contact Washington County Health Department, 651-430-6655 Will cooking operations be conducted? No D Yes I&] Contact Stillwater Fire Department, 351-4950 Will alcohol be served but not sold? No D Yes [ZJ See Alcohol Regulations in the Instructions Will alcohol be sold? No D Yes ~ See Alcohol Regulations in the Instructions Will there be a fireworks display? No I&! Yes D Permit required, contact Stillwater Fire Department, 651-351-4950 Describe power needs and location of power source. Amphitheater, Grey boxes in Lot 5, 9 , and Pole on lot 4 and Gazebo Describe level of advertisement (ie, radio, flyers, ads, tv, press release). Attach sample if available Social media, Newspapers, Flyers, Press Release, etc City Services (After reviewing the event application, City services may be requrled for the event.) Will event use, close or block any of the following: If yes specify location on site map. City Streets or Right-of-way No D Yes ~ Start/End Time: Friday 4 pm Date: Sunday 8 pm City Sidewalks or Trails No [ZJ Yes D Start/End Time: Date: Public Parking Lots or Spaces No D Yes ~ Start/End Time: Friday 12 am Date: Sunday 10 pm Will event need barricade(s)? No I&! Yes D Number needed: Fees may apply see Instructions Will extra picnic tables be needed? No IZl Yes D Number needed: Fees may apply see Instructions Will portable restrooms be needed? No D Yes ~ Number needed: uf.:; /)1561 f5 Fees may apply see Instructions Will extra trash receptacles be needed? No [&] Yes ~ Number needed : -1!)-Fees may apply see Instructions Describe trash removal and cleanup plan during and after event: Maroney Sanitation will remove trash as needed during and after the event Will event need traffic control? No ~ Yes D Contact Stillwater Police Department for assistance, 651-351-4900 Describe crowd control procedure to ensure the safety of participants and spectators: Security officers will coordinate with Stillwater Police Department Will "No Parking Signs" be needed? No D Yes I&] Number needed: Fees may apply see Instructions Show location(s) on site map Will event need security? No D Yes ~ If event is overnight, security will be required. If using private secruity, list Security Company and Contact Information: Security Specialist Inc; Sam Ehlenz (651) 439-8440 Will event need EMS services? No D Yes l&l Contact Lakeview EMS, 651-430-4621 Describe plans to provide first aid, if needed: First Aid kit available at the information kiosk and at the Water Street Inn. Describe the emergency action plan if severe weather should arise: The Water Street Inn will be available if severe weather should arise. List any other pertinent information: The sponsor(s) of this event hereby agrees to save the City, its agents, officials and employees harmless from and against all damages to persons or property, all expenses and other liability that may result from this activity. Depending on the size of and scope of the event a "Certificate of Insurance" may be required. If insurance is required, the policy must be kept in force during the event of at least the statutory limits for municipalities covering claims that might be brought against the event that arise out of the events authorized and to name the City as an additional insured on their policy "as their interest may appear." As the sponsor or authorized representative, I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge and agree to pay the permit fee for this event based upon the information provided in this application. I realize my submittal of this application request constitutes a contract between myself and the City of Stl/1.i--.,.,,.e_r_a~e of Llabili June 4, 2019 Date j .. \ - Lot 11 \ ) Event Border -Jersey Barricade Type 3 Barricade 6/4/2019 IMG_3828 .jpg Lot 11 -Jersey Banfcade -l'ype3 Banfcade https://mai I .google .com/mail/u /0/?tab=rm &ogbl#search/in %3Asent+HarvestF est+map/FMfcgxvzLDqmrN Gp THQTjKtF GPPBBlbV?projector= 1 &messag ... 1 /1 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-20 1-7500 Fax 651 -297-5259 TIY 651 -282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of or9!!1lzatlon Date organized Tax exempt number ~IL..3:-~c~;n:~:~(:.,,,::12:;:""-~a..~:v:?:,d::-=/::.....,..;'f?:=. ========1,=1 2;.;.;,.cz..;,...1'-l"'--Z-rz-ot_:t___,I I 'tf-2t.31tr t Address City State Zip Code I ,/)/ /~.L <+ e:-:: I 1£7r,Jkrr~,,_ I !MN 11 i?5'o&'2 I w/.;...::.tJ....c..L-...!:::v...:..,£.,,_...:;:..![-'-D-=-~ ;;....,,,,. ~--;;)-'-:.., j ~--· ...c;z ____ ___._ . . . . . Name of person making =tlon Business phone · W..e phone 6,,p' ul &....::::1,o;.t::.;c...,v.,_~$.:.=...;,:..!:;.~~~~-v _______ ___,! l6/-35f-.3 1~31 I ~5/ Z?;;,--~7?i Oate(s) of;ent Type of organization ,;;;.1 =a.;..;,L;,;--;--C:.;....6_2_r __ ,tt;; ____ l--,--/=2-?'_2_0_1_1. __ --,I D Club D Charitable D Religious Organization officer's name City _S_ta_te ____ _, Zip Code ~ Other non-profit I._... U2..-.:....,.YV~J5'..c..:"'=-=t!'"""'zbtr=;....:;..=...:;..__ ____ ____,l l.fr,i/##!~---I !MN 113i?c;~2 I r • OrgfUzation officer's name Oty State Zip Code L.11'10-"-"':A.'""""'ud~-ffi~zK.L.:~~f-<-+IJ------'1 1 al fiyi)k~MN I l750S2 Organization officer's na~ City State Zip Code ...... I ?A...._. 'lc.cZ: __ '/e_· _..,#...__.~==«..;.'/1,""""112""""r. ....... e _____ _.! [5.6dLwh v I E __ ..... I l~Cr.52. O~lz.ation officer's name Oty ~l.zs;...:a..<-!l-1<'-.r.uk.e&.~n..__/-d~~~.6-~~~~-___.ll.i%~ovr State Zlp Code I !.__MN __ __..l I -!iSa:>3 Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. /U>d/. 4a~// ~y~ -u~~,;,/~,,, .#7/uU?ft!',y ~il/ If the applicant will contract for Intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. /1,;Y/-; If the applicant will carry li quor liability Insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. M,~/ L5e,._)fa.5?tv~nce., 'fhl,.~~ APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL ANO GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approved Permit Date City or County E-mail Address Gty or County Phone Number Si gnature City Cle rk or County Offlclal Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE~ Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLV. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS All TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL E·MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE,TEMPQRARYApPUCATION•STATE,MN,US 1 Beth Wolf From:Cory Buettner <corybuettner@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 28, 2019 3:09 PM To:Tom McCarty; Beth Wolf Cc:Chuck Dougherty; Brandon lamb; Cassie McLemore Subject:Stillwater HarvestFest 2019 Hello Tom and Beth, Tom thank you for the opportunity to meet with you this morning. I am writing to submit a formal proposal that the base fee and load-in fee (2 @ $500 and $500; totaling $1500) be waived from our 2019 invoice. The reasoning behind this request is due to the increased expenses associated with having "Free-Range Beer" throughout the event boundaries. If approved this would be treated as an in-kind sponsorship of our event which includes the following benefits: ● Optional Space at the event. ● Inclusion in select event publicity as “Event Sponsor” ● Small Logo on sponsor posters (visibility from August 2019 - October 2019) ● Small Logo on event banner displayed both days ● Logo & Link on website (visibility through Summer 2020) ● Emcee Mentions throughout the event ● A thank you and link on our Facebook page ● 10 drink/popcorn tickets ● 4 beer, wine & chili tasting tickets Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you, Cory Buettner President Summer Tuesdays, Inc. Cell (651) 295-4725 PLANNING REPORT TO: City Council CASE NO.: HPC 2019-09 REPORT DATE: August 28, 2019 MEETING DATE: September 3, 2019 APPLICANT: N/A LANDOWNER: Dan and Allison Boblit REQUEST: Consideration of approval of a Demolition Designation Study LOCATION: 116 Harriet Street South ZONING: RB, Two-Family Residential REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION On May 15, 2019 the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) considered a request from Jim Barton of Barton Construction Services, representing Dan and Allison Boblit, property owners, for the demolition of the garage on the property at 116 Harret Street North. The HPC denied the demolition permit on the basis there was a feasible alternative to demolition of this historic resource. On June 4, 2019 the City Council upheld the HPC’s decision and ordered the preparation of a Demolition Designation Study. The Demolition Designation Study was prepared by the 106 Street View (Google Images – August, 2013) HPC Case no. 2019-03 Page 2 Group, and submitted to the City on August 5, 2019; the Study is attached for the City Council’s review. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consider approving the Designation Study (Study) for the Swain-Hooley Garage, located at 116 Harriet Street North. ANALYSIS The Study notes the Swain-Hooley garage was constructed during the Development of Residential Neighborhoods Historic Context period but that the garage is not eligible to be listed under any of the City’s applicable historic criteria. The 106 Group’s recommendation indicates: “The Swain-Hooley Garage does not meet any of the local Heritage Preservation Site criteria as an individual property. Therefore, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site. However, the Swain-Hooley House is recommended eligible for individual designation under Criteria #1 and #3. The Swain-Hooley Garage is recommended eligible as a contributing resource to the Swain- Hooley House only under Criterion #3 for the property’s association with David M. Swain and Matt Hooley. It is not recommended eligible as a contributing resource under Criterion #1 because its construction is not associated with the development of the Greeley neighborhood”. In other words, while the garage is not eligible to be locally listed as a heritage preservation site, the residence is and, if the residence is listed, the garage should be listed as contributing to the site. That said, the designation study was a result of the garage’s demolition request. POSSIBLE ACTIONS City Code Section 34-4, Subd. 2(2)(b)(iii)(1).“if the city council denies implementation of the designation after completion of the designation study, then the building official shall issue the demolition permit”. The City Council has the following options: A. Approve the Study. If the Council approves the Study, it acknowledges the structure is a historic resource but not independently eligible for local designation. If the Council approves the Study, this would mean the Council may: 1. Move to authorize the demolition of the structure; or 2. Move to table consideration of the demolition of the structure for determination to be made no later than November 11, 2019. B. Deny the Study. If the Council denies the Study, then it does not accept the Study findings and will continue to pursue individual listing of the structure. If the Council denies the study, this would mean the City must begin designation implementation. Under this scenario, the HPC would need to hold a public hearing (with 30 days advanced legal notice), consult with the State Historic Preservation Office, and solicit input from the Planning Commission prior to making a recommendation for designation HPC Case no. 2019-03 Page 3 to the City Council. The City Council, too, would need to hold a public hearing prior to their consideration. If the City Council denies the implementation of the designation (i.e. elects to not locally designate the structure), then the demolition permit may be issued. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The City’s demolition designation study process was created to determine if structures should be locally designated opposed to being demolished. As the demolition is proposed for the garage and not the residence, the findings of the report indicate the structure is not currently eligible to be locally listed. Therefore, following the process outlined within the City Code, the structure should be permitted to be demolished. Therefore, staff would recommend acceptance of the designation study and move to approve the demolition of the structure. Attachments: Stillwater HPC Historic Site Designation Registration Form cc: Dan and Allison Boblit Jim Barton Peter Frank Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Historic Site Designation Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name _________________________________________________________________________ Other Names __________________________________________________________________________ SHPO No. _____________________ 2. Location Street Address _________________________________________________________________________ City __________________________ State __________ County __________ Zip Code ____________ 3. Heritage Preservation Commission Certification The Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission determined that this site is eligible for designation as a Heritage Preservation Site. Chair Date 4. City Council Certification The City Council approved designation of this site as a Heritage Preservation Site. Mayor Date 5. Classification Ownership of Property: ___ Private ___Public-local ___Public-State ___ Public-Federal Number of Resources within Property ______________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions ___________________________________________ Current Functions ___________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Style __________________________________ Materials foundation _____________________________________ walls _________________________________________ roof __________________________________________ other _________________________________________ Integrity __________________________________ Narrative Description Describe the property on one or more continuation sheets. Name of Property________________________________________ 8. Statement of Significance Applicable Historic Criteria ___ 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Stillwater, State of Minnesota, or the United States.___ 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event.___ 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. ___ 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment.___ 5. Its identification as work of an architectural or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City of Stillwater.___ 6. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. ___ 7. Its unique location, scale or other physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, a district, the community, or the City of Stillwater. Applicable Historic Contexts ___ I. Precontact Period Native American Cultural Traditions___ II. Native Americams, european contact, Initial Setlement___ III. St. Croix Triangle Lumbering___ IV. Town Planning and Development___ V. St. Croix River, Railroads, and Overland Transportation___ VI. Late Nineteenth Century Agricultural Development___ VII. Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Industrial Development___ VIII. Development of Downtown Stillwater___ IX. Development of Residential Neighborhoods___ X . Development of Stillwater City, Washington County, and State Government Date of Construction ____________________________________________________________ Significant Dates ________________________________________________________________ Significant Persons _______________________________________________________________ Architect/ Builder _______________________________________________________________ Previous Documentation: Currently listed on National Register ___ Previous Surveys ___ Narrative Statement of Significance Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets. Name of Property________________________________________ Swain-Hooley House only Swain-Hooley House, to which Swain-Hooley Garage is a contributing resource Name of Property________________________________________ 9. Bibliography Use one or more continuation sheets as needed. 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property ________________ Property Identification Number _______________________ UTM References ___ ___________ _____________ ___ ___________ _____________ Form Prepared By Name ________________________________________________________________________________ Organization ___________________________________________ Date _________________________ Address _____________________________________________ Telephone _______________________ City __________________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _____________ Additional Documentation Maps A USGS or city map indicating the property’s location.A sketch map for properties having large acreage or numerous resources. PhotographsRepresentative photographs of the property. Property Owner Name ________________________________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________ Telephone _______________________ City __________________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _____________ Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 1 Narrative Description The Swain-Hooley Garage is located at the northwest corner of the property at 116 Harriet Street North in the Greeley neighborhood of Stillwater (Map 1). The associated Swain-Hooley House is located to the east-southeast of the garage, near the center of the property. A brick sidewalk runs from the garage eastward to the house. This property is sited on top of a steep bluff, overlooking downtown Stillwater and the St. Croix River valley to the east. The Swain-Hooley Garage, built in 1918 for David Swain, faces Rice Street and is accessed by a concrete driveway (City of Stillwater 1918). This one-and-a-half-story building rests on a poured concrete foundation, is clad in horizontal wood siding, and has a front gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles (Figure 1). The roof was originally covered with “roofing felt” (City of Stillwater 1918). The north elevation, facing Rice Street, features two single-stall garage doors: a paneled wood overhead garage door with six square lights to the east, and a replacement steel overhead garage door with five rectangular lights to the west. The wood door is also likely a replacement because of the garage’s age, but the original door was also likely wood. The upper half-story features a single-leaf wood door in the center. The east elevation, facing the house, features a single-leaf wood door that is flanked by two-over- two, double-hung wood windows (Figure 2). The south elevation features a two-over-two, double-hung wood window at the east end and a single-leaf wood door on the upper half-story (Figure 3). There is no fenestration on the west elevation (Figure 4). The interior lumber is stamped with “Gould LBR CO. Seattle, Wash.” The Swain-Hooley House, built in 1878 for David Swain, is one-and-a-half stories tall and designed in the Gothic Revival style (Empson 1997a; Washington County 2019). The house faces Rice Street. It rests on a cement block foundation, is clad in horizontal wood siding, and has a cross gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles (Figures 5 and 6). A one-story, half-width, open, wraparound porch is located in the west half of the north-facing façade and is accessed by wood steps. The porch has a hipped roof, square wood posts with brackets, a wood railing, and a wood floor. There is a gable within the hipped roof at the east end of the porch with a simply decorated vergeboard. This gable accentuates the primary entranceway to the house. The second story of the façade features paired gables with decorated vergeboards and pointed windows. The east elevation features a one-story, partial-width, enclosed porch surmounted by a balcony in the north half and a bay window in the south half (Figure 7). The east elevation also has paired gables on the second story with decorated vergeboards. The southernmost gable also has pointed windows. The south elevation as a bay window on the first story and a gable with a decorated vergeboard on the second story. The center of the west elevation features a full-height projection that is gabled with a decorated vergeboard and has pointed windows on the second story (Figure 8). There is a one-story projection on the southwest corner of the house that contains a secondary entranceway and provides access to a deck. The deck has a wood floor and wood railings, and is accessed by wood steps. The west elevation also provides access to the wraparound porch at the northwest corner of the house. Visible fenestration includes two-over-two, single-hung, pointed vinyl windows; two-over- two, double-hung vinyl windows; wood French doors; a single-leaf wood door with six lights; a single- Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 2 leaf wood door with six square lights and three rectangular lights; and a single-leaf wood door with nine lights. Integrity The property retains excellent integrity of location as it remains in its original location. The property also retains good integrity of setting as it remains in a residential neighborhood, with few changes to the setting since the garage was completed (Washington County 2019). The integrity of the garage’s design, materials, and workmanship has been slightly compromised by replacement garage doors and roofing. The integrity of the house’s design, materials, and workmanship has been compromised by the replacement foundation, replacement siding and windows, and additions/alterations throughout the house. However, some of the additions were constructed to replicate the original design of the house, including the gables with decorated vergeboards and pointed windows. The property retains fair integrity of feeling and association. Overall, the property retains fair integrity. Narrative Statement of Significance History Greeley Neighborhood This property was platted in 1856 as part of the Thompson, Parker & Mowers 2nd Addition, which is part of the Greeley neighborhood (Empson 1997b:15-16). Only two houses were built in the Greeley neighborhood between 1856-1861 (Empson 1997b:21). In the 1870s, 31 houses were built, including this one; most of the houses were one-and-a-half to two stories tall and developed primarily around Olive and Myrtle (formerly Spring) Streets (Empson 1997b:22,25). The 1880s saw a building boom in the neighborhood, with 87 homes built (Empson 1997b:30). The neighborhood was almost completely developed by the end of the 1800s (Empson 1997b:33). Most of the residents were blue-collar workers; the few independent businessmen included two attorneys, a harnessmaker, two barbers, and a few retail business owners (Empson 1997b:36-37). From 1900 to 1940, many of the earlier houses were enlarged and remodeled (Empson 1997b:44). There was not much new construction in the Greeley neighborhood in the first half of the twentieth century. However, a second building boom occurred in 1950 when 26 new homes were built (Empson 1997b:30). Many of the houses in the Greeley neighborhood were designed in the nineteenth century vernacular style, along with some examples of Gothic Revival, Queen Anne, and Stick Style (Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission [HPC] 2013). Property History This property is located on Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 8 of the Thompson, Parker & Mowers 2nd Addition plat. In 1856, after the lots were platted, the land was granted from Levi E. Thompson et al. to Elam Greeley. In 1857, the land was granted from Greeley to Joseph A. Russell. In 1878, the land was granted from Russell to David M. Swain (Washington County n.d.). Swain-Hooley House The house was built in 1878 for David Swain (Washington County 2019). There is no original building permit for the house as building permits were not issued in Stillwater until 1886. According to a bird’s eye view map from 1879, this property was the only one built on Block 8 at that time. This house, along Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 3 with three houses across Rice Street on Block 1, were the only houses in the Greeley neighborhood located north of Myrtle Street and east of Martha Street (Empson 1997b:28). Parcel data indicates that the adjacent property at 115 Harriet Street North was built in 1872, but it is not depicted on the 1879 map (Washington County 2019). In 1919, a building permit was issued for a two-foot by twenty-foot porch; the builder was George D. Hill (City of Stillwater 1919). This porch may refer to a one-story, shed-roofed, screened porch on the north- facing façade, visible in a 1997 historical photograph taken during the previous survey, or a one-story, shed-roofed, open porch on the east elevation, visible in a circa 1977 historical photograph (Figure 9); both porches were replaced in 2015 (Empson 1997a; Washington County Historical Society n.d.). A building permit was issued for an addition in 1992; the location of the addition is not known. It may refer to a one-story addition on the west elevation, visible in a 1997 historical photograph taken during the previous survey; this addition was later replaced in 2015 (City of Stillwater 1992). As of 1997, during the previous survey, the house had vinyl siding, which replaced the original siding (likely wood) at an unknown date, and new windows throughout. Also, in 1997, the house’s tin roof was replaced with cedar shakes (City of Stillwater 1997; Empson 1997a). In 2015, the house underwent a major renovation. Its original limestone foundation was replaced with cement block and the house’s vinyl siding was replaced with wood siding, likely in kind with the original wall cladding. On the north-facing façade, a second gable with a decorated vergeboard was added in the west half and the porch was replaced with an open, wraparound porch. A one-story addition on the west elevation was removed and replaced with a larger, two-story addition (City of Stillwater 2015a; City of Stillwater 2015b; Empson 1997a). During the 2015 renovation, all of the windows were replaced, some with pointed windows in kind with the original pointed windows on the east, south, and west elevations, according to historical photographs, (Empson 1997a; Stillwater Public Library n.d.a). The remodel also included removing a one-story, partial width, enclosed, shed-roofed porch on the east elevation and replacing it with a flat-roofed porch. Additionally, the bay window on the first story of the east elevation, which had been removed at some point after 1977, was reconstructed (Google 2013; Stillwater Public Library n.d.a.). The upper-story window above the porch, which was originally a pointed window and had been replaced with a double-hung window at some point after 1977, was replaced with a set of French doors (Empson 1997a; Google 2013). The interior of the house was also extensively remodeled (City of Stillwater 2015a; City of Stillwater 2015b). The roof was likely redone at this time, replacing the cedar shakes with asphalt shingles. The decks on the east and west elevations of the house were built in 2017 (City of Stillwater 2017). The house exhibits characteristics of the Gothic Revival style, which was common in Stillwater from 1845 to 1880. These characteristics include its steeply pitched roof, pointed windows, and front-facing gables with decorative vergeboards (Stillwater HPC 2013:9). Swain-Hooley Garage The garage was built in 1918 for David Swain as a “storehouse,” according to the original building permit. No builder is listed on the permit (City of Stillwater 1918). No later building permits for the garage are on file at the City of Stillwater. The windows and wall cladding are original. However, both garage doors have been replaced at an unknown date. The easternmost door is in kind as a wood door, Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 4 while the westernmost door is not in kind as a steel door. The pedestrian door on the east elevation has also been replaced. The garage was reroofed in 2005 (City of Stillwater 2005). The garage does not exhibit characteristics of a known architectural style. No additional information was found on the Gould Lumber Company, or its connection to Swain. However, because the lumber industry in Stillwater and the St. Croix Triangle collapsed in the early 1900s, it is not surprising that lumber from another state was used to build the garage (Vogel 1993:20). Occupant History Swain Family The original owner of the property was David M. Swain, for whom the house and garage were built. Swain was born in 1841 in Golden Prairie, Illinois. Swain married Juliana (Anna) Ainsworth in 1868 in Illinois before moving to Minnesota; they went on to have seven children of which five survived to adulthood: Percy, Gertrude, Maude, Verne, and Fred. When Swain came to Minnesota, he initially worked as a steamboat engineer in St. Paul. Through this experience, he decided to become a boatmaker in order to improve on the design of side-wheeler steamboats and the efficiency of standard steamboat boilers. In 1872, he opened a foundry and machine yard in Stillwater, Minnesota. This was the first business of its kind in Stillwater. By 1873, he operated his business from an old warehouse on Main Street (address is not known). His business was known by multiple names over the years, including D.M. Swain’s Marine Engine Works, Swain’s Foundry and Machine Shop, and Swain Iron Works. The business moved to 106 Third Street South (non-extant) in 1874. The company succeeded initially through the construction of sawmill rigs to support the booming lumber industry (Barnum 1935:1,7; Buck 1990:85; Peterson 2018:A2; R.L. Polk & Co. 1898:295; Stillwater Public Library n.d.a.). Swain built this house at 116 Harriet Street North in 1878. Swain was considered one of the most affluent residents of the Greeley neighborhood in the 1870s-1890s, and likely beyond, based on the value of his personal property (Empson 1997b:27). In 1881, Swain employed 20 men and his company manufactured marine engines, mill machinery, and related equipment (Neill 1881:521). Soon after, Swain began building steamboats. Swain’s first steamboat was named Percy Swain and was built in 1882 using a secondhand hull. Swain implemented many of his design ideas on the Percy Swain, including cross-compound engines placed with a high- pressure engine on one side and a low-pressure engine on the other side, and a lightweight jet condenser. He built his second boat, Verne Swain, in 1886; it was similar to the Percy Swain but also had a multi-flue single boiler and a “fan blower for better stack draft” (Buck 1990:86). Both boats were sold and operated on other rivers in the Midwest and South. In the 1870s-1880s, Swain was the only manufacturer that could build a complete boat with hull, engine, and all other components (Barnum 1935:1,7). By 1887, Swain’s company furnished the machinery for nearly all of the boats built in Stillwater, many of which served the local lumber industry. His next boat was the Borealis Rex, built in 1888, which helped Swain begin business along the Illinois River between Peoria and La Salle, Illinois. The company continued to thrive into the early 1900s and developed a strong following in Stillwater and in Peoria, Illinois (Barrett 1887:13; Buck 1990:87-88; Peterson 1996). However, because of World War I and the diversion of freight traffic away from the river, Swain was forced to close his company in 1918 for financial reasons. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 5 Swain got sick while traveling on the Verne Swain with its new owners to Pittsburgh and passed away on July 3, 1918 (Buck 1990:90). It is estimated that he built approximately 265 steamboats during his “building days,” before he transitioned into company operations (Barnum 1935:1,7). Anna remained at 116 Harriet Street North until her death in 1928 (R.L. Polk & Co. 1930:133). Hooley Family Matt and Alva Hooley purchased this property in 1929 (HPC Staff Report: Case No. 2019-09, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, May 15, 2019). Matt was the son of Dennis J. Hooley, who had opened a meat market in the South Hill neighborhood of Stillwater in 1876 (Peterson and Thilgen 1992:27). In 1901, Dennis moved the market to 902 4th Street South, which today is owned by Hooleys Corner LLC but no longer operates as a market (Washington County 2019). Hooley’s market had several names over the years, including D.J. Hooley’s South Hill Meat Market, Public Provision Co., and Hooley Meat Co Inc. (Peterson 2013:49; Polk & Co. 1924:69; R.L. Polk & Co. 1927:69). Matt was born in 1898 and joined the family business as soon as he was old enough, along with his brothers Roy and John. In 1921, Matt married Alva Ellen Wright; they went on to have three sons John “Jack,” Charles “Charlie,” and Thomas, and three daughters Jean, Marjorie, and Dorothy. In 1925, Matt opened Hooley’s Grocery Store at 108 Main Street North in downtown Stillwater, in addition to running the family’s market with his brothers. By 1927, Matt was vice president of the family’s business. In 1933, the downtown store moved across Main Street in 1933. In 1938, Matt succeeded his brother Roy as president of Hooley Meat Co. Inc. Also, in the late 1930s, Matt remodeled the store and it became the first self-service store in Stillwater. In the late 1940s, the downtown store moved again to a different location on Main Street, north of Myrtle Street, and the business also expanded to the City of Red Wing, Minnesota, and the City of Hudson, Wisconsin. The store’s fourth downtown Stillwater location, at Myrtle and Water Streets, opened in 1961 as Hooley’s Supermarket. The Red Wing and Hudson locations closed in the early 1970s, and the South Hill location closed in 1976. The downtown Stillwater location remained open until 1993 and was demolished in 1995. During his lifetime, Matt was also active as a member of the Board of Directors of the Farmers and Merchants State Bank, the VFW, BPO Elks Lodge No. 179, Knights of Columbus, Disabled Veterans, American Legion, Bully Beef Club, Rotary Club, and Stillwater Board of Education for District No. 834. Matt passed away in 1971; at the time of his death, he was Chairman of the Board of Directors for Hooley’s Supermarket (Courier News, 23 December 1993; Empson 2002; The Evening Gazette, 3 April 1995; Lebens 2018:A1; A13; McCormick 1986; Peterson 2013:49; R.L. Polk & Co. 1924:69; R.L. Polk & Co. 1927:69; Stillwater Public Library n.d.b.). In 1968, Matt and Alva’s sons Jack and Charlie co-founded Consumers United for Buying (Cub Foods). The business was described as “the first warehouse-style grocer with high volume and low prices,” and greatly impacted the grocery industry (Peterson and Thilgen 1992:27). Cub Foods was sold to SuperValu in 1980 and remains in operation today with locations throughout the country (Lebens 2018:A13; Peterson and Thilgen 1992:27). Alva Hooley passed away in 1996 and ownership of the house passed to her daughter Marjorie Ann Hooley (Dorsey & Whitney LLP 1997; Stillwater Public Library n.d.b.). Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 6 Present-Day The house has been owned by Daniel and Allison Boblit since 2014 (First National Bank 2014). Significance This property was previously surveyed as part of a National Register survey of the Greeley neighborhood. The house was preliminarily recommended as not eligible for listing in the NRHP (Empson 1997a; Empson 1997b). The focus of this local designation study is the Swain-Hooley Garage. However, the garage is an accessory structure to the Swain-Hooley House. Therefore, the garage was evaluated for local significance individually and as a contributing resource to the Swain-Hooley House. This property was evaluated for local significance within the following historic context: “Development of Residential Neighborhoods in Stillwater, 1850-1940” (Vogel 1993). The “History of the Greeley Neighborhood” narrative was also consulted (Empson 1997b). According to Stillwater City Code, Section 22-7, Subd. 4, this property was evaluated for local significance under the following Heritage Preservation Site criteria: 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Stillwater, State of Minnesota, or the United States. The construction of the Swain-Hooley Garage does not stand out within the history or development of Stillwater, the Greeley neighborhood, Minnesota, or the United States. It was not uncommon in 1918 for properties in the Greeley neighborhood to have detached garages (Sanborn Map Company 1910; Sanborn Map Company 1924). This garage is also not indicative of the heritage or cultural characteristics of Stillwater or the Greeley neighborhood. Therefore, the garage is not individually eligible under Criterion #1. The Swain-Hooley House is one of the oldest houses on Block 8 in the Thompson, Parker & Mower’s 2nd Addition, and one of the early residences in the Greeley neighborhood. Built in 1878, it preceded the neighborhood’s major building boom of the 1880s. Therefore, the Swain-Hooley House is eligible under Criterion #1 because of its role in the development of the Greeley neighborhood. Because the Swain- Hooley Garage was built in 1918, well after the 1880s building boom, it does not contribute to the Swain- Hooley House’s significance under Criterion #1. 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event. According to local histories, the Swain-Hooley Garage is not known to have been the site of a significant historic event. Therefore, the garage is not individually eligible under Criterion #2. Additionally, the Swain-Hooley House is not known to have been the site of a significant historic event. Therefore, the house is not eligible under Criterion #2. 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. The Swain-Hooley Garage was built by David M. Swain, a prominent local boatmaker and the founder of the first foundry and machine shop in Stillwater. However, the building permit was issued about two Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 7 months prior to Swain’s death and, therefore, could only have been used minimally by David (Buck 1990:90; City of Stillwater 1918). Therefore, the garage does not illustrate David’s contributions to the City of Stillwater. His wife, Anna, resided at the property until her death in 1929. However, local histories do not indicate that Anna significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. Therefore, the garage is not significant for its association with Anna Swain. Finally, Matt Hooley, a prominent local businessmen/grocer, resided at the property from 1929-1971 and his wife, Alva, lived here from 1929-1997. However, local histories do not indicate that Matt used the garage in a distinctive way or in relation to his business. Therefore, the garage is not illustrative of Matt Hooley’s contributions to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. Additionally, Alva is not known to have significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. Consequently, the garage is also not significant for its association with Alva Hooley. Therefore, the Swain-Hooley Garage is not individually eligible under Criterion #3. The Swain-Hooley House, however, is eligible under Criterion #3 for its associations with David M. Swain and with Matt Hooley. Swain significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater through his successful foundry and boatmaking business, which directly supported other local industries by furnishing machinery and boats. His renown extended to Illinois and likely indirectly supported development in Stillwater through its reputation as a maker of quality boats. Swain is associated with two properties in Stillwater: his residence at 116 Harriet Street North and his foundry and machine yard at 106 Third Street South from 1874-1918. However, his foundry and machine yard are no longer extant. Therefore, the Swain-Hooley House is the best representation of Swain’s contributions to the culture, history, and development of Stillwater. The Swain-Hooley Garage, built for David M. Swain, is a contributing resource to the Swain-Hooley House for its association with David M. Swain, who was a prominent figure in Stillwater at the time the garage was built. Matt Hooley was a second-generation grocer in Stillwater. His father’s business began in 1876 and operated continuously through two subsequent generations until 1993, under Matt’s leadership and that of his sons, and led to the creation of Cub Foods, a statewide and nationally known company. Matt led the expansion of the business locally, starting in 1925, and, while serving as president of the family’s business, introduced the concept of self-service grocery in Stillwater in the late 1930s. He also led the company’s regional expansion to a total of four locations in the late 1940s. Within Stillwater, Hooley’s business operated from several locations along Main Street, of which only his first location at 108 Main Street North appears to remain extant. Hooley’s grocery store operated at this location from 1925-1933, which encompasses the early years in his career and not the most significant years in which he expanded the business and assumed the presidency of the company. Consequently, this location does not illustrate the continued growth and impact of Hooley’s contributions to the history of Stillwater. Matt resided at 116 Harriet Street North for the majority of his life, from 1929 until at least 1968, prior to his death in 1971 (R.L. Polk & Co. 1968:86; Stillwater Public Library n.d.b.). Due to his long-term residence at 116 Harriet Street North, during which time he grew his business and implemented new ideas, the Swain- Hooley House is the best representation of Hooley’s contributions to the history of Stillwater. The Swain- Hooley Garage, as part of the property during which time Hooley achieved his significance within the history of Stillwater, contributes to the house’s significance under Criterion #3. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 8 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment. The Swain-Hooley Garage does not embody distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form, or treatment. Therefore, the garage is not individually eligible under Criterion #4. The Swain-Hooley House does embody distinguishing characteristics of the Gothic Revival style, including its steeply pitched roof, pointed windows, and front-facing gables with decorative vergeboards. However, the house has undergone various renovations, alterations, and additions. The 2015 remodel did reconstruct some original elements of the house’s design in-kind, but it also expanded the building’s footprint, particularly in the west half. Although the house mimics the Gothic Revival style, of which there are few examples in the Greeley neighborhood as most of the surrounding houses are vernacular, the house does not retain sufficient historical integrity to be eligible under Criterion #4 as a distinctive example of the Gothic Revival style. 5. Its identification as work of an architectural or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City of Stillwater. The architect and/or builder of the garage is not known. Therefore, the garage is not an example of the work of a master and accordingly, the Swain-Hooley Garage is not individually eligible under Criterion #5. Likewise, the architect and/or builder of the house is not known. Therefore, the Swain-Hooley House is not eligible under Criterion #5. 6. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. The Swain-Hooley Garage does not exhibit significant elements of architectural design or detail, and therefore, it does not represent a significant architectural innovation. It also does not represent significant use of materials or craftsmanship. Therefore, the garage is not eligible under Criterion #6. The Swain-Hooley House, before and after its renovations, exhibits standard elements of the Gothic Revival style. However, it lacks more distinctive elements of the style, including turned porch columns, finials on the gables, decorative crowns over windows and doors, and castle-like towers with parapets (Stillwater HPC 2013:9). Therefore, it does not embody significant elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship, and does not represent significant architectural innovation, and it is not eligible under Criterion #6. 7. Its unique location, scale or other physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, a district, the community, or the City of Stillwater. The Swain-Hooley Garage is sited at the northwest corner of the property, facing the nearest street intersection. However, its location and scale are not unique, and its physical characteristics do not represent any established and familiar visual features of the Greeley neighborhood or the City of Stillwater. Therefore, the garage is not eligible under Criterion #7. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 9 The Swain-Hooley House is perched on the top of a bluff and has an unobstructed view of downtown Stillwater and the St. Croix River valley. However, it is not highly visible within the Greeley neighborhood due to dense tree cover and because the house is tucked away from the nearest street intersection. It is also not highly visible from downtown Stillwater due to dense tree cover on the bluff. Additionally, there are other bluffs throughout the City of Stillwater on which houses are sited. Therefore, the house’s location is not unique. Its scale is larger than many of the neighboring buildings, but comparable to other examples in the Greeley neighborhood and in the City of Stillwater. Finally, the house does not exhibit an established and familiar visual feature of the Greeley neighborhood or the City of Stillwater. Therefore, the house is not eligible under Criterion #7. Recommendation The Swain-Hooley Garage does not meet any of the local Heritage Preservation Site criteria as an individual property. Therefore, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site. However, the Swain-Hooley House is recommended eligible for individual designation under Criteria #1 and #3. The Swain-Hooley Garage is recommended eligible as a contributing resource to the Swain- Hooley House only under Criterion #3 for the property’s association with David M. Swain and Matt Hooley. It is not recommended eligible as a contributing resource under Criterion #1 because its construction is not associated with the development of the Greeley neighborhood. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 10 Bibliography Barrett, E.F. 1887 Stillwater City Directory. E.F.Barrett, Stillwater, Minnesota. Barnum, Charles E. 1935 Boats Built By Swain Made River History. The Stillwater Gazette 7 November:1, 7. Stillwater, Minnesota. Buck, Anita Albrecht 1990 Steamboats on the St. Croix. North Star Press of St. Cloud, Inc., St. Cloud, Minnesota. City of Stillwater 1918 Building Permit #1683. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1919 Building Permit #1714. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1992 Building Permit #0077. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1997 Building Permit #9700439. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2005 Building Permit #2005-01012. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2015a Building Permit #2015-00773. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2015b Building Permit #2015-00567. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2017 Building Permit #2017-00553. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. Courier News [Stillwater, Minnesota] 1993 “Chapter in city history is closing.” 23 December. Stillwater, Minnesota. Dorsey & Whitney LLP 1997 Personal Representative’s Deed of Distribution #945414. On file at Washington County Government Center, Stillwater, Minnesota. Empson, Donald 1997a City of Stillwater Architecture-History Inventory Form: WA-SWC-515. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. 1997b A History of the Greeley Residential Area, Stillwater, Minnesota. On file at the Stillwater Public Library, Stillwater, Minnesota. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 11 2002 The West Half of the Churchill, Nelson & Slaughter Addition Residential Area, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. On file at the Stillwater Public Library, Stillwater, Minnesota. Evening Gazette, The [Stillwater, Minnesota] 1995 “And the walls came tumbling down.” 3 April. Stillwater, Minnesota. First National Bank 2014 Real Estate Mortgage #4012926. On file at Washington County Government Center, Stillwater, Minnesota. Google 2013 Street View. Electronic document, http://maps.google.com, accessed July 24, 2019. Lebens, Alicia 2018 Local business leader, former mayor Charles Hooley dies at 89. The Gazette 21 June:A1, A13. Stillwater, Minnesota. McCormick, Elise 1986 Charlie Hooley as busy, or busier, than ever… The Stillwater Gazette 6 February. Stillwater, Minnesota. Neill, Edward D. 1881 History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley. North Star Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Peterson, Brent 1996 The three Davids of Stillwater. St. Croix Valley Press 22 February:9. Stillwater, Minnesota. 2018 David Swain: Plying the River. The Gazette 25 May:A2. Stillwater, Minnesota. Peterson, Brent T., and Dean R. Thilgen 1996 Stillwater, Minnesota: A Photographic History 1843-1993. Valley History Press, Stillwater, Minnesota. R.L. Polk & Co. 1898 Stillwater City Directory 1898-99. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1924 Stillwater City Directory 1924-1925. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1927 Stillwater City Directory 1927-1928. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1930 Stillwater City Directory 1930-1931. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 12 1968 Polk’s Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) Directory 1968. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company 1910 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. 1924 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission [Stillwater HPC] 2013 Stillwater, Minnesota: Preserving Historic Neighborhoods. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Stillwater Public Library n.d.a. Swain clippings file. On file at Stillwater Public Library, Stillwater, Minnesota. n.d.b. Matt and Alva Hooley clippings file. On file at Stillwater Public Library, Stillwater, Minnesota. Vogel, Robert C. 1993 Stillwater Historic Contexts: A Comprehensive Planning Approach. Prepared by Robert C. Vogel & Associates. Prepared for the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Washington County n.d. Stillwater tract book. On file at the Washington County Government Center, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2019 Property Viewer. Electronic document, http://maps.co.washington.mn.us/propertyviewer/, accessed July 25, 2019. Washington County Historical Society n.d. Swain clippings file. On file at the Washington County Historical Society, Stillwater, Minnesota. Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 13 Photographs Figure 1. Swain-Hooley Garage, Facing South-Southwest Figure 2. Swain-Hooley Garage, Facing West Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 14 Figure 3. Swain-Hooley Garage, Facing North Figure 4. Swain-Hooley Garage, Facing South-Southeast Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 15 Figure 5. Swain-Hooley Garage (at left) and Swain-Hooley House (at right), Facing Northeast Figure 6. Swain-Hooley House, Facing South Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 16 Figure 7. Swain-Hooley House, Facing West Figure 8. Swain-Hooley House, Facing East Swain-Hooley Garage Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 17 Figure 9. Circa 1977 photograph of the Swain-Hooley House, taken by River Town Restoration, Facing Northwest (Stillwater Public Library n.d.a.) WA-SWC-515 Map 1 116 Harriet Street NorthStillwater, Minnesota W Myrtle StW Myrtle St S 6 th S tS 6 th S t W Rice StW Rice St N 5 th S tN 5 th S tN Harriet StN Harriet StInventoried Property Map Produced by 106 Group 7/24/2019Source: 106 Group; MnDOT; Washington County 0 30 Meters 0 80 Feet [1:1,500 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia,© OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community ^_ WA-SWC-515 House Garage MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Reabar Abdullah, Assistant City Engineer DATE: August 30th, 2019 SUBJECT: Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll and Calling for the Hearing on Proposed Assessment for the 2019 Street Improvement Project (Project 2019-02) DISCUSSION The contractor is progressing on the 2019 Street improvement Project. The project is scheduled to be completed by the end of October. Based on the work completed and estimating the cost of the remaining work, staff has projected the total cost of the project to be $2,439,991.81. The assessment roll needs to be prepared and a hearing held. It is proposed that that the hearing will be held October 1, 2019. This will certify the project to the County this year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council declare costs, authorize the preparation of the assessment rolls, and call for a hearing on the project. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass the following resolutions: 1. RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2019 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2019-02). 2. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2019 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2019-02). RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2019 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2019-02) WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined for the improvement of streets and utilities and the contract (bid) price for such improvement is $2,159,377.9 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $280,613.91 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $2,439,991.81 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby declared to be $1,029,084.61 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $1,410,907.20. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2020, and shall bear interest at the rate of (2.75%) Two and three quarter percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolutions. 3. The city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in their office for public inspection. 4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. Adopted by the City Council this 3rd day of September 2019. ______________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2019 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2019-02) WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 3, 2019, the city clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for the 2019 Street Improvement Project. The following is the area proposed to be assessed. Properties abutting 2nd Street N (Laurel St. E to Wilkins St E), Oak St W (Sherburne St. S to S Holcombe St), Sherburne St N (Pine St W to Myrtle St W), William St S (Pine St W to Oak St W), Martha St S (Pine St W to Olive St W), Country Side Ct, Hidden Valley Ct, Hidden Valley Ln, Hillside Ln, Parkwood Ln, Sunrise Ave, Sunrise Ct, Evergreen Ct, Knollwood Ct, Broadway St S (North of 6th Ave S), 6th Ave S (Churchill St E to Broadway St S), Willard St E (Broadway St S to Locus St E) (Triangle Park), Locus St E (Broadway St S to Willard St E), Walnut St E (2nd St S to Broadway St S). WHEREAS, the clerk has notified the council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 1st day of October, 2019 in the city hall at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He/she may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer; (in whole or in part) the remaining principal balance, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the City Council this 3rd day of September 2019. _______________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Shawn Sander~1'r:ctor of Public Works August 27, 2019 2019 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project (Project No. 2019-06) Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll, and Calling for the Hearing for: DISCUSSION: One of the last steps in the Public Improvement Process for the 2019 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project is to declare costs, order the preparation of the assessment roll and call for the hearing. The total project costs are estimated to be $67,814.20. The proposed cost for the sidewalk rehabilitation and the amount to be assessed to the affected property owners is $33,907.10. The remaining amount would be paid by the City through its bond sale. It is proposed that properties would be assessed based on amount of sidewalk removed and replaced at a rate of $7.47 per square foot. The date of the assessment hearing is scheduled for October 1, 2019. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the preparation of the assessment roll and call for a hearing on the above project. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the recommendation, Council should pass a motion adopting the following resolutions: 1. RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2019 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 2019-06). 2. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2019 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 2019-06). RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2019 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 2019-06) WHEREAS, a contract has been let and costs have been determined for the rehabilitation of existing sidewalks and the contract (bid) prices for such improvement is $56,071.20 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $11,743.00 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $67,814.20 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the city is hereby declared to be $33,907.10 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $33,907.10 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2020, and shall bear interest at the rate of two and three-quarters percent (2.75%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolutions. 3. The city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in their office for public inspection. 4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. Adopted by the council this 3rd day of September 2019. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2019 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT (PROJECT 2019-06) WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 3, 2019, the city clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost for the 2019 Sidewalk Rehabilitation. The following is the area proposed to be assessed. 101 3rd St S, 102 3rd St S, 104 3rd St S, 106 3rd St S, 108 3rd St S, 110 3rd St S, 112 3rd St S, 114 3rd St S, 116 3rd St S, 118 3rd St S, 120 3rd St S, 146 3rd St S, 148 3rd St S, 150 3rd St S, 204 3rd St. S. 506 4th St S, 901 4th St S, 319 Hickory St W, 323 Hickory St W, 1025 Legend Blvd, 1035 Legend Blvd, 709 Linden St W, 717 Linden St W, 1216 Macey Way, 102 Main St N, 103 Main St N, 108 Main St S, 112 Main St N, 124 Main St S, 127 Main St S, 212 Main StN, 214 Main St S, 219 Main StN, 221 Main StN, 223 Main StN, 232 Main St S, 270 Main St N, 317 Main St S, 321 Main St S, 324 Main St S, 333 Main St N, 402 Main St N, 423 Main St S, 450 Main St N, 501 Main St N, 512 Main St N, 520 Main St N, 602 Main St N, 607 Maple St W, 308 Melville Ct N, 613 Newman Tr. AND WHEREAS, the clerk has notified the council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in the office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILL WATER, MN: 1. A hearing shall be held on the pt day of October, 2019 in the city hall at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He/she may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer; (in whole or in part) the remaining principal balance, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the City Council this 3nd day of September 2019. ATTEST : Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2019-____ ADOPTING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR THE PAYABLE YEAR 2020 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the sum of $14,569,272 is hereby levied against all of the taxable property of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, for City purposes for the payable year 2020. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the sum of $44,400 is hereby levied against all taxable properties within the WMO (Waste Management Organization) parcel-specific taxing district of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, for City purposes for the payable year 2020. The Levy consists of the following: GENERAL TAX LEVY:10,547,146$ DEBT SERVICE TAX LEVY: Fund Required Levy for 2020 Amount 312 G.O. Capital Outlay 2012A 375,220 314 G.O. Capital Outlay 2014A 711,418 324 G.O. Capital Outlay 2014 (Armory) 85,000 326 G.O. Capital Outlay 2016A 823,883 327 G.O. Capital Outlay 2017A 401,696 329 G.O. Capital Outlay 2009D 311,128 318 G.O. Capital Outlay 2018A 486,431 339 G.O. Capital Outlay 2019A 427,350 Subtotal 3,622,126$ New Debt G.O. Capital Outlay 2020 400,000 Total Debt Service Tax Levy 4,022,126$ TOTAL TAX LEVY 14,569,272$ PARCEL-SPECIFIC LEVY WMO Levy $44,400 Adopted by the Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. ______________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2019-____ ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE YEAR 2020 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the proposed budget appropriations for the year 2020 in the amounts for the following funds: Fund Fund Name Amount 100 General Fund 14,735,774$ 200 Special Events Fund 73,000 202 St Croix Valley Recreation Center Fund 1,724,786 230 Library Fund 1,485,820 240 Parks Fund 1,068,275 251 Downtown Beautification Fund 15,000 255 Washington County Recycling Fund 35,260 285 Lodging Tax 209,222 Total 19,347,137$ Adopted by the Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. ______________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2019-____ SETTING PAYABLE 2020 TRUTH-N-TAXATION PUBLIC MEETING BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the Payable 2020 Truth- in-Taxation meeting shall be at 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 3rd, 2019. Adopted by the Council this 3rd day of September, 2019. ______________________________ Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Beth Wolf, City Clerk %2$5'$*(1'$ %RDUGRI&RPPLVVLRQHUV )UDQ0LURQ'LVWULFW 6WDQ.DUZRVNL&KDLU'LVWULFW *DU\.ULHVHO'LVWULFW :D\QH$-RKQVRQ'LVWULFW /LVD:HLN'LVWULFW 6HSWHPEHU $0 Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 5ROO&DOO 3OHGJHRI$OOHJLDQFH &RPPHQWVIURPWKH3XEOLF Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it to the County Board Clerk or the County Administrator. The County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and city of residence, and present your comments. Your comments must be addressed exclusively to the Board Chair and the full Board of Commissioners. Comments addressed to individual Board members will not be allowed. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. &RQVHQW&DOHQGDU5ROO&DOO9RWH Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action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ssistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 6KHULII V2IILFH'RXJ%HUJOXQG(PHUJHQF\6HUYLFHV0DQDJHU $ $GRSWDUHVROXWLRQUHFRJQL]LQJ6HSWHPEHU DV1DWLRQDO3UHSDUHGQHVV0RQWKLQ :DVKLQJWRQ&RXQW\ *HQHUDO$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ0ROO\2 5RXUNH&RXQW\$GPLQLVWUDWRU &RPPLVVLRQHU5HSRUWV&RPPHQWV4XHVWLRQV This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting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ashington : :County %2$5'$*(1'$ %RDUGRI&RPPLVVLRQHUV )UDQ0LURQ'LVWULFW 6WDQ.DUZRVNL&KDLU'LVWULFW *DU\.ULHVHO'LVWULFW :D\QH$-RKQVRQ'LVWULFW /LVD:HLN'LVWULFW $XJXVW $0 Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 5ROO&DOO 3OHGJHRI$OOHJLDQFH &RPPHQWVIURPWKH3XEOLF Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it to the County Board Clerk or the County Administrator. The County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and city of residence, and present your comments. Your comments must be addressed exclusively to the Board Chair and the full Board of Commissioners. Comments addressed to individual Board members will not be allowed. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. &RQVHQW&DOHQGDU5ROO&DOO9RWH Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action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ssistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call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his period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting. %RDUG&RUUHVSRQGHQFH $GMRXUQ 5HFRPPHQGHG%XGJHW:RUNVKRSV $ 5HYLHZWKHUHFRPPHQGHGEXGJHWIRUWKH'HSDUWPHQWRI3XEOLF+HDOWK (QYLURQPHQW DQG8QLYHUVLW\RI0LQQHVRWD([WHQVLRQ %5HYLHZWKHUHFRPPHQGHGEXGJHWIRUWKH&RPPXQLW\6HUYLFHV'HSDUWPHQW %RDUG:RUNVKRSZLWK$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ.HYLQ&RUELG'HSXW\&RXQW\$GPLQLVWUDWRU $5HYLHZ2UJDQL]DWLRQDO$VVHVVPHQWUHSRUWUHFRPPHQGDWLRQV Washington : :County