HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-12-09 CPC PacketW �,
water
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
December 4, 1991
THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1991 AT
7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NORTH llRj�� R ET.
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes - November 18, 1991.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. SUB/91-61 - Preliminary Plat Approval for the subdivision of a
1.33 acre site into three lots of 17,850 square feet, 20,473 square Feet,
and 15,681 square feet. The property is located north of West Orleans
Street, behind i251 West Orleans Street, between Greeley Street and the
Highlands of Stillwater in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Scott R. Grover, Applicant.
2. Case No. V/SUP/91-6 2 - A Variance and Special Use Permit to conduct a four
bedroom Bed and Breakfast at 622 West Churchill Street and to conduct a one
bedroom Bed and Breakfast at 807 South Harriet Street. The properties, abut
one another in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Truett and Jill
Lawson, Applicants.
3. Other Business.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
DATE: November 18, 199i
TIME: 7:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman
Angela Anderson, Gene Bealka, Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott,
Gary Funke, Don Valsvik, and Darwin Wald.
ABSENT: Rob Hamlin.
ALSO PRESENT: Steve Russell, Community Development Director and Ann
Pung-Terwedo, City Planner/Substitute Secretary.
The meeting was called to order by Gerald Fontaine at 7:00 P.M. Chairman
Fontaine welcomed new member Darwin Wald.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Gary Funke to approve the minutes of October 14, i991 as submitted.
Seconded by Don Valsvik. ALL IN FAVOR.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. CASE NO. V/91-51 - A continuation of a variance to the sideyard setback
requirements for construction of a garage on a corner lot (30 feet required,
17 feet requested) and to the size requirements for an accessory structure at
317 North Owens Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Donald
Hill, Applicant, presented the proposal.
Duane Elliott questioned the .large space for the storage of vehicles. Mr. Hill
explained he plans to fix snowmobiles and other recreational vehicles. He also
stated he prefers not to eliminate the parking area for his father's RV which
is parking on his property during the summer months.
Gerald Fontaine was concerned about the 17 foot setback from the street to the
garage. He felt there wasn't adequate room to park cars and allow room for
pedestrians to walk without walking in the street. There are no sidewalks on
this side street.
Gary Funke agreed with Mr. Fontaine. He would like to see the plan changed to
accommodate more driveway area thereby changing the work area of the garage to
the west.
Duane Elliott made a motion to deny the request as proposed, seconded by
Angela Anderson. ALL IN FAVOR.
2. CASE NO. V/91-50 - V/91-53 - A continuation of two variance requests for
the placement of a pylon sign and free-standing sign at ilU South Greeley
Street. The property is located in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Heidi Rosebud and Melissa Johnson, Applicants.
1
Mr. Russell presented the background on the sign proposal to date. The new
sign plan consists of two fifty square foot pylon wall signs. One sign will
face Greeley Street and the other will face Myrtle Street.
Heidi Rosebud presented the new sign program proposal and changes made from
the last Planning Commission meeting.
Angela Anderson questioned the illumination of the signs. Ms. Rosebud stated
that the sign would illuminate approximately 10-15 feet from the sign.
Mike McCarthy, 210 South Greeley Street, presented an alternate sign proposal
for the signs. He also presented a resolution from Rivertown Restoration
against the signs as proposed and support of the alternate sign proposal.
Mr. McCarthy stated that three issues stand out on this proposal.
1. The need for signage;
2. Parking lot lighting;
3. Character of the neighborhood.
Ms. Rosebud stated the sign plan, as proposed, met the concerns of the
Planning Commission.
Melissa Johnson, retail shop owner at the site, stated that signage for tale
building should also appeal to the younger generation.
Bridget MConnel, employee at the Stillwater Fitness Center, stated the sign
needs to be visual to all customers.
Mr. McCarthy stated that this type of signage in residential neighborhoods is
a problem throughout Stillwater.
Don Valsvik made a motion to approve the sign prograM as proposed for the two
fifty square foot wall signs. Seconded by Gary Funke. Approved 6-2 wit►i the
following conditions:
1. All existing signage shall be removed.
2. No other permanent or temporary signage is allowed.
3. The illumination shall be of a moderate intensity approved by the
Community Development Director.
4. The sign shall be turned off by 10:00 P.M.
3. Case No. SUP/91-55 - A Special Use Permit to maintain a cougar on a
residential property within the City of Stillwater. The property is located at
1251 West Orleans Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Richard Sowers, Applicant.
James Anderson, Attorney for Mr. Sowers, presented the proposal. He discussed
his background with wild animals and his experiences with pheasants. He has a
great appreciation for wild and endangered animals.
3
Mr. Anderson reviewed the "conditions of approval" with the Planning
Commission. Changes were made -to the conditions to clarify the wording. These
include the following:
I. Mr. Anderson wanted to clarify what the cat did when not supervised and
was changed to read: " The cougar shall remain inside its confinement
space at all times when not supervised. Outside the confinement space,
on the property, the cougar shall be on a leash handled by an adult."
2. Mr. Anderson stated that Condition No. 2 was too strict. Mr. Sowers
wants to show his cat at special functions or other City festivals or
activities. Mr. Anderson suggested this condition be changed to have
the Police Departments or other City personnel approve functions the
cat way attend within the City limits of Stillwater. The condition was
changers to read "The cougar shall not be allowed to walk tide streets of
Stillwater, or be allowed in City parks or on City property, without
prior approval from the City Council or authorized personnel.
3. This condition was changed to read: "A detailed structure plan of the
new confinement space shall be submitted to the Community Development
Director for approval before building permits are issued.
4. This condition was changed to read: "The confinement space shall be
locked at all times when the cougar is in his cage."
6. This condition was changed to read: "No other cougars or other wild
animals or undomesticated animals shall be allowed on the premises.
Angela Anderson had trouble with the definition of "wild animal"
8. Mr. Sowers stated the owners of the property should not.have to giver
permission on this request. Mr. Valsvik stated that if Mr. Sowers
wanted a woodshop business in his house, he would need approval from
the property owners as stated in the Zoning Ordinance. This conditions
stands as stated.
10. The noise issue was discussed. The issue of defining noise nuisances
from a public safety standpoint was questioned. This will be reviewed
before the City Council meeting.
OTHER STATEMENTS AND COMMENTS:
Mr. Sowers stated he wants to walk the cougar around Stillwater.
Mark Hall, Mr. Sowers friend and resident of Oak Park Heights, stated
he was raised with a bear and feels that wild animals are not a threat
to the public.
Don Valsvik stated that this is a city of 14,000 people. The City needs
to have regulations.
Jerry Fontaine stated that there is an Ordinance now. The Planning
Commission is implementing that Ordinance.
Sis Casanova questioned if anyone can get a Special Use Permit for wild
animals.
Peter Bergerson, National Coordinator, Owners of Wild Animals, stated
animals can be in control on public property if properly controlled.
Jerry Fontaine closed the hearing.
3
Duane Elliott made a motion to approve the Conditions of Approval as stated
and revised. Seconded by Don Valsvik. APPROVED, 6-2, AS CONDITIONED.
4. Case No. SUB/91-57 - A 10 foot by 135 foot Minor Subdivision of Lot 13,
Block 11 to Lot 14, Block 11 of Churchill, Nelson and Slaughter Addition. Lot
13, Block 11 is located at 1020 South Fifth Street in tide RB, Two Family
Residential District. Dennis and Marge Galowitz, Applicants, presented the
proposal.
Mr. Galowitz stated that this subdivision would clear up the title on the
property since their garage is presently 10 inches over the property line.
Don Valsvik made a motion to approved the subdivision request. Seconded by
Gary Funke. ALL IN FAVOR.
5. Case No. PUD/91-58 - A Planned Unit Development and Resubdivison for the
construction of two duplex units at 310 North Second Street in the RB, Two
Family Residential District. BARK Properties, Applicant.
Mr. Russell presented the Planned Unit Development proposal in relation to
density, setbacks, and specific conditions of the site.
Mr. Briggs, reviewed the proposal with the Planning Commission.
Juff Orff, neighbor, questioned the easement when the neighboring property
owners sell their property.
Frank Rheinberger, representing neighbor Alice O'Brien, has concerns with the
tile system in the walls and the impacts of the development on neighboring
property.
Duane Elliott questioned the system on the property. Fie stated this system
outlet should be connected to the storm sewer and not the sanitary sewer on
Mulberry. Attention should be drawn to that concern.
The following conditions were added or changed:
1. No increase in run-off to the South.
2. Present retaining walls be maintained except for a sidewalk access to
North Second Street. These are the walls with the drain tiles.
3. The cistern drain line should be connected to the storm sewer.
Case No. SUP/V/91-59 - A Special USe Permit and Variance for the construction
of a multi -purpose addition to St. Mary's Church. The property is located in
the RB, Two Family Residential district. Richard Olson and Richard Huelsman,
Applicants.
Clark Engler presented the site plan for the proposal. He reviewed the color
and brick whicft will pick up details from the church. They also want to save
the two maple trees t the rear of the property. The new site plan will reflect
this.
4
Duane Elliott questioned the parking in the area. Dick Huelsman stated the
site plan has been changed to reflect the new parking arrangement. The change
in grade of the property on the driveway will be similar to Richard Kilty's
driveway.
Mr. and Mrs. Medberry, 210 West Pine Street, stated there only concern is the
wall of the structure. They would like to see the building pushed back 7-8
feet.
Jeff Johnson, 309 South Fifth Street, said he also had design concerns.
Mr. Kilty questioned a retaining wall, which would be two feet from the
sidewalk. He asked if the retaining wall is to protect the footings on the
building. He also questioned why a kitchen was incorporated into that specific
location. He also asked whey the elevator could not be relocated. Mr. Huelsman
stated the elevator needed to be located in an exit corridor.
Father Miller stated that this facility will meet the needs of a growing youth
population of the church community. It is also needed for funeral and church
functions at the site.
Mr. Huelsman reviewed the lighting which included pedestrian lighting to match
the lighting in the church.
Mr. Olson also said he would plant five foot shrubs to screen the property.
Drainage will also be corrected.
Mark Balay, neighbor, expressed his concern about the parking lot improvements
across the street. He said these issues have been identified and resolved with
the church. He has no problems with the project as proposed.
Mr. Fontaine restated the "Conditions of Approval" as written and added
conditions regarding drainage and driveway slope,'east instead of west.
CONDITION OF APPROVAi:
Gary Funke made a motion to approve the Special Use Permit and Variance as
proposed. Seconded by Darwin Wald. ALL IN FAVOR.
Jerry Fontaine made a motion to adjourn. seconded by Angela Anderson. ALL IN
FAVOR.
The meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Ann Terwedo
Substitute Secretary
5
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/91-6i
Planning Commission Meeting: December 9, 1991
Project Location: West of Greeley off end of West Orleans Street.
Comprehensive Plan District: Residential
Zoning District: Single Family Residential (R-A)
Applicant's Name: Scott R. Grover
Type of Application: Minor Subdivision (Three Lots)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Subdivide existing 1.24 acre lot into three lots of .41 acres, .47 acres and
.36 acres.
DISCUSSION:
Tne request is subdivide an existing 1.24 acre parcel into three parcels of
17,860, 20,473 and 15,714 square feet. Tne site is located in the Single
Family Residential (R-A) Zoning District requiring 10,000 square feet per
dwelling unit. The proposed meets the zoning lot size request for the R-A
District. No improved roadway, sanitary sewer or water service is currently
available to the site. These public improvements would have to be provided
before the parcels can be finally platted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approva with condition.
CONDITION 0_F APPROVAL:
Road, sanitary sewer and water utility improvements shall be constructed
before the final plat is approved.
IIA
Case 1\umber
C-'
Fee Paid __-__.-----_--
Data F lled
Street Location of Property: ..____---__-_ _-------..__________________..
Logal Doscription of Property:
Owner: lame _.-_-___ _ _
� - j :a �z 3 - q,6131 0AM - 3:1e
Address 16JL L Nk0AL9� _ Phone: qW_-_d ZL____
Applicant (if other than owner): dame _______ ______ __ -______-..________
Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request ___ Rezoning Approval of Preliminary Plat
Special Uso Pormit ___ Approval of Final Plat
--- Variance Other -______- ____------
Description of Request: SJ.3%�lJ� _.!STJ11l .�a. _�_________
_--_- ___------______-w_-_--- �____---------------
Signature of Applicant: __________
Data of Public Hearing:----_---_..______..___w------------------- ----
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be draw:z,on back of this form'or at-'
tac'red, showing the following:
1. Nort:. direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. ► �,� A�'" -ter
3. Dimensions of front and side set-backs,�-��
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. „5(0',Y41`��'' cy
5. Street names. �T`
o. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
suolect to the following conditions: ____________________________________
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho Council on ________________ subject to tha
following conditions; _____________..__-_-__-_-_--_-___---__--_-__----_
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other sido),
BRUCE A. FOLZ & ASSOCIATES
LAND SURVEYING ■ LAND PLANNING
1815 NORTHWESTERN AVE. • STILLWATER, MINNESOTP55082 (612) 439-8833
November 6, 1991
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SCOTT GROVER
All that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE1/4 of NE1/4)
of Section Thirty-two (32), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West,
Washington County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the East Quarter corner of said Section 32 thence North 01 degree
13 minutes 23 seconds'West, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate
System,,South Zone, along the east line of said Southeast,Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter a distance of 230.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue North
01 degree 13 minutes 23,seconds West, along said east line, a distance of 268.00
feet; thence North 89 degrees 30 minutes 11 seconds West, parallel with the -south
line of said Southeast,Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 290.52 feet
to a point 2 feet east of an existing barbed wire fence which replaced the old high
board fence of the Stillwater Park Association race track (according to Mr. Gilbert
Benson); thence southerly along a curve, which is parallel with and distant about
2 feet east of said barbed wire fence, having a radius of 473.83 feet and a central
angle of 15 degrees 47 minutes 29 seconds a distance of 130.59 feet to the intersection
with a line which is 130.00 feet south of the north line of said tract herein conveyed,
as measured along said east line, the chord of said curve bears South 03 degrees
58•minutes 00 seconds West; thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 11 seconds East,,
parallel with said south line, a distance of 159.08 feet; thence South Ol degree
13 minutes 23 seconds East, parallel with said east line, a distance of-138.00 feet;
thence South 89 degrees 30 minutes 11 seconds East, parallel with said'south line,.
a distance of 143.22 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.33 acres, more or .
less. Subject to an easement and together with the right to use said easement for
road purposes described as follows: Commencing at said East Quarter corner of
Section 32; thence North 89 degrees 30 minutes 11 seconds West, along said south line
of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter'a distance of 143.22 feet being
the south line of this 30.00 foot road easement; thence North 01 degree 13 minutes
23 seconds West, parallel .with said east line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter a distance of 368.00 feet, being the center line of a 60.00 foot road easement,
and 30.00 feet on each side of said center line.
t herel•y certify zhi:t this sur kivY, I:.- c;. r_
wa3 prepared L,�- ir: nt
r.ii-i-ter niv
Land C"w' Vey!; ( UIIU'-:r V.x It,ws
o
�If11 iC.'i01n,
'
BRUCL A. FULL
Qsto. �/ �- 9� Peg. No. _ 9 Z 3 2_
J
v
W
_
L
Id
ry
f
UI
pN
y
y
W
(nvwi
z`
W7
Z¢
W
d
w
p_
#;nl_z
lI O
,ax
61
yu
o'n
m j
R
N
z v
E
ZI F rl
LL
2z
W CL
jY q z H
n
r7
V'
n
-
vl
y
til
w
,r >
cn CCYY
�
c
o
J
a„sz,
F/o ro
s
Ar -- -
--l/ .sroa .a�ja�
'a -. ii71 'aJ//» %,aoJYJ/i O/O 10 C�UY�VII/mil:
U)
U)
Z
Q
w
0
.RC01��5 rv'r
---OO'86fs zsr�dr6-t__—._"• �., ?,5 -_y ; ;� ��y,: sj?� I _ �.
24 'L L.• .� '� c i ZE_•.�aS �iL`_.S 'p`-•r� f ::lr / s'r,3 N I• �,. A A
tt l
6
OD
crjW
, Y
O\92 +••i
y p.
Srlav
i rq t S uau.nsvi► avy }.
3�
r
�j
I �
•N � `— Q r pip �� d r
IZ
-OQO• ��
V)
C
LL-
00
aC
C
Z
a
Cl. ]! �V .
U z Lei
w >
J _ C
J
w Q
0 L0
O Lf-)
I'n
H
w p
w r1r)
o G)
w L>�
U a
Q r_RI
< c S 7
Q wF-"-
IYF-c
Ld w � O C\.
U) - U
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/SUP/91-62
Planning Commission Meeting: December 9, 1991
Project Location: 622 West Churchill Street and 807 South Harriet Street.
Flood Plain: No Bluffland/Shoreland District: No
Applicant's Name: Jill and Truett Lawson
Type of Application: Variance and Special Use Permit.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A Variance and Special Use Permit to conduct a four bedroom Bed and Breakfast
and a one bedroom Bed and Breakfast in another structure on an adjacent lot.
DISCUSSION
The request is to conduct a four bedroom Bed and Breakfast in an historic home
on Churchill Street and then add a fifth Bed and Breakfast room on an adjacent
lot which is under the same ownership but listed as separate parcels. The
definition of a Bed and Breakfast according to Stillwater Ordinance No. 681 is
Bed and Breakfasts "An owner/manager occupied residential structure used as a
lodging establishment where a room or rooms are rented on a nightly basis and
which only breakfast is served as part of the basic compensation." Under this
definition, it means one structure may be used as a Bed and Breakfast, not two
structures. This request is therefore for two Bed and Breakfast
establishments. The Variance is needed because these structures are within
three blocks of one another.
The site plan shows enough off-street parking for the four bedroom Bed and
Breakfast off Harriet Street. There are three off-street parking spaces in
front of the garage and enough parking for five cars in the drive-thru area.
These parking spaces should be signed for the Bed and Breakfast use.
The application report shows where the location of the low voltage lighting
will be located. The applicants did not show the type of lighting and the
intensity level.
The interior plan of the homes shows how the structure will be used for the
Bed and Breakfast use. A bedroom is identified for the owner/manager.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
See at-fichedcon- i d' ions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval 176_r the four bedroom Bed and Breakfast.
Denial of the variance for the additional room in the Carriage House.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use for the four bedroom Bed and Breakfast will not be injurious
to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be
in harmony with the general purpose of the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
-- App] cation package.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
BED AND BREAKFAST
CASE NO. V/SUP/91-62
1. This Special Use Permit is issued to the current property owners, Truett
and Jill Lawson, and shall not be transferred, assigned or conveyed to any
other firm or successive owner.
2. Any adult members of the Lawson Family, or a comparable person, shall be
on site at all times for the purpose of managing the facility.
3. The permitter shall comply with all Health, Fire and Safety Rules and
Regulations of the State of Minnesota and the City of Stillwater.
4. That a maximum of four bedrooms and eight guests per day shall be
accommodated at the facility at any one time.
5. No alcoholic beverages are to be sold or otherwise provided by the owners
to the guests on the premises.
6. No pets of guests shall be allowed at the facility.
7. Meals may be served only to guests of the facility.
8. That all guest parking shall be provided on site with assigned parking for
each guest room 'and owner/managers.
9. There shall be no additional external lighting of the site or residence.
10. The premises shall not be used as a rooming house, boarding house, hotel
or motel.
11. The Bed and Breakfast is allowed one identification sign not exceeding
four (4) square feet and shall be located on site. The sign plan snall be
reviewed by the Community Development Director before installation.
12. The applicant shall submit the type of lighting and intensity level for
the walkway lighting.
VOW
1101111
jai It
pp,
fill
I qI-I
AIM
'30
JAMES A. MULVEY RESIDENCE INN
BED AND BREAKFAST
A. Request
W1e, True ttt almid Jill Wvison, request a special. use pe uit to operate
DEC and br akfast on. our propert i at 62211i. Cj}�� 1 l (Lots 5;'�t�:�f�:
S1 :S, alaa� h Addition--Still�r�ater according to all the rep + ; taQ in
Section 31.01 of the Stil Iwater Citu Cade, Subd.13(2)(d) an"; Suhd.
1bt:i:�tc�.
. Historical Importance
The abcue pFopert� wal.the home of Jams. Sul =1elj and hiphe;
dr3
fr011m the: ml01 its co� 1� 1� 4��� i n he a 0 , 1nt.-J ia_ k si l ' TAi c�� Mete un,t. !Y ilify 1� i.
tka qummac 9RU 1113f n�•�s ire lgran} 1i recnolsibie fog• 11%
Y17L IIVIIVI Li S:.�I1111151 !1 V 1, 11�1 LI S ill ��l SL� 1 ng sp ,: 3 l h
remarkable condition of this home.
Hulve�j, a loindoner: become one of the seven most successful
f umber -man ;i7 1is al•�a. 1Ln�V� �! l�r�a�iIlI�iitM�11jsIN I0nIm
regiment, gears before he become a U.S. citizen.
Mulviou's house is a stunning example of Italianate Victorian
a; chit ecture. The Carr icge house behinid it (converted to a re}iye ce i n
1973 : is 0 iGHi ir1j 3trudture that has the remarkable feel of tie
of 1;uIveu cd C"gloand -,lith vines coverin, In the ummalr.
Bull, the most) unique par.- V1 i► his hous r. is the fireplace. 80"filei, I'
between 1905 and 1913, the Vulveu's purchased and installed a tiie
Tirepiace f=•t'm the Grueb!j Potteq and Tile Compowi of Boston, ?has}. The
onl!j other known Gruebu Tile fireplace was removed from a Ouiuth hone
bpi a Helvi York -dealer and has recentlg been purchased b!j the yinneapolis
Institute of Art.
A legend came with the house regarding the black walnut trees an the
lots. The stor•g is that after the Civil War, Hulveq returned with
certain momentos including several black walnuts. t4hen he bought the
Churchill St. propert�j; he planted them for us all to enjoy.
,A
C. The Procertu
qq I�1e Teel .j%i� tnr'i1�let'Tl� i� ODA f T Tne nKeU GSSe,S tI!at :ilaKe- our!' nmo all
idlao ba.d aidbr'eakfast. T^e ��;ll�afj glace i'ias locaYLd Yn fi�ie viv�� tots
#�a%7ii ig '� t, � n�i �'3;1 G rc. On file .,.rune of C�!urLd ii11 and iini'i'iei,, 1W e
,oroperi t'j lilies extend fr gill the corner 1510 fee, east down Churc4il I .'It.
nnU - � � f:AIF'i(wn HnrrJ.er, to -1)P Pd a- h;i rriVi no. i 3 hnuse fac;r�
~12 t nn�+ the carriage house., ar'r''�t i Alt ntoi'es` ��',or's
vuv. vr� sa k v:�u r i i awl,. r 1 11,.ia
house art;'; el1 ovei 11,30i from our house. The entire front ha fi of tiie
Pr�.pervu is surrounded bu itsnoriginal ,victor ran iron fence. I hel'e is no
red and breakfast residence near (3 blocks) our hone.
The size of the yard provides a sense of privaq ideal for pat,'1-:iis and
neighbor's. The priol is nestled in a low area in the -haul{ of the 1a;,
surrounded bg a 6 foot (the plan) feryae,
R. The A;Dplicants
Jil and Truett 'ow-lon moved het a 1,`'Gul o�1t�'Yr' i �aiii ornla in
as%tt fiber of 1990. Truett is tilt Executive Minister of tiie n1prIeSDIA
Conference, a denomination of 148 Barntist Churches in Minnt{;l .n, He k
also on the ward of Regents of Bethel College. Jill is a registered
nurse and Works at Lakeview hospital.
file have collected antiques al 1 our lives and bought a historic home
for that reason. Jill loves the iiter'ior decorating. Truett is an
advanced collector of American 9rt Ceramics. These qualities wi11
enhance the ambience of our bed and breakfast.
E.. The Operation ++}}
We have a good size famillu With three cn:! ar en (age:1 HMO) sL1: 1
listing with us. Our plan would be to live in both the main house and the
carriage house, securing the main house with an overnight familu member.
We would do our meal preparations for guests in the main house kitchen
and our familg's in the carriage house kitchen.
rrla would rent five rooms eventual19, with limited future remodeling,
Without expanding t,lc siLc of the house. Foul Vf those r VU .2 �°fUIJIU UC i"
the main house alus a coal -side roam in the lower level of the carrirvie
house. the feel this is all we will eater be able to handle and thus f
completLl!j supportive of the cities limitation. (See Plan)
�'n�•Linn dam na mi 1 inhting - - -
1
urrentl u:' pr er �' 1}mare than ode --ate far' cif street H, s11C2.
Our two cars can be accoiru?dated in the carriage house garage. Two spots
are available in the garage in the main house. Faur.spots are available
beside the garages. A turn -in drive is also available. Lose range, we
trill develop the area north of the carriage house behind the ravine.
This is ideallg suited to virtualDj invisible parking.
Our lighting plan includes the present lighting (carriage tope) on the
house, plus low voltage lighting on the walkwou arteries. (See Site
Plan)
Our plan is to integrate a signpost into the gate in the vic4orian
fence directlu in front of our house. We will adhere strictlu to the size
restrictions.
11
V PLC t4 LL_
sY'S}Ffoov
S
eCo�nc� �-Pn�w
'�y
Pf(b;7-j E i7
IJl��a
l ✓ ��Y�c30 W��Z
�Ed r'ocw 3
1z-`17
y o VO4 1 • IVW
s
i
�j roovA A
<<2 3
a o-&Rbm
x 17
J 0 56 6 eW t ID LEVEL--
ILI
12
W..
wo CQwe�v�5
Ov C�fT•vw'r GcR� 1f ICS.�� il�i��.t3
•�.� 4�ro�,Sp�Q irtaw Vmt-}��e/ I%Ochs .
r �
/1
'
L y
1'AC 1JJ
• k
CASE NUMBER
Case Number -----------
Fee Paid
Date Filed ---------_____
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE 1VE FORM
Street Location of Property: - _ t q__ ...-____-- -..
Logol Description of Pro lff: Owner: Name Name �TRut,"f t J -
Address ! Z __ __ �_`''`Y�-�"=i�__ Phone: 34��
Applicant (i► other than owner): Name ________ KIA -___-___-__--__-_
Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
_2-f Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
Variance . ___ Other _______ ______
Description of Request: __ kk-F�' _
--- - [-- ►rh o-y - — Sfoow►S-----------------------
Signature of Apolica----------
Date of Public Hearing: -------___---______________________-________-
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn•on back of this form or at.
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
subject to the following conditions: --------- _--------------------------
---------------------- r-------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
following conditions: ________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other side),