HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-12 CPC PacketS
water
I (�Ll w�w
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
April 7, 1993
THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, APRIL 12, 1993 AT 7:00
P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET.
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes - March 8, 1993.
AGENDA
1. Case No. V/93-17 - A Variance to the frontyard setback requirements (30 ft.
required, 12 ft. proposed) and the slope development standard (no
development on slopes over 12%) for construction of a 20 ft. by 24 ft.
attached garage at 118 Lakeside Drive. The property is located in the RB,
Two Family Residential District/Bluff land/Shoreland District. Michael and
Sheryl Meyer, Applicants.
2. Case No. SUP/93-18 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a sales office for
fitness equipment at 222 West Cherry Street above an existing garage. The
property is located in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Jeffrey H.
Palmer, Applicant.
3. Case No. SUP/93-19 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a theatrical
production in a 40 ft. by 60 ft. temporary tent structure. The property is
located at 501 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District.
Mary Lou Meagher-Gammans, Applicant.
4. Case No. SUB/V/93-20 - A Variance to the lot width requirement (75 ft.
required, 74.17 feet proposed) for a minor subdivision of a 22,244 square
foot lot into two lots of 11,122 square feet. The property is located on
Lots 3 and 4, Block 34, Carli and Schulenburg's Addition (the 1600 block of
North First Street) in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Robert E. and Sandra J. Walters, Applicants.
5. Case No. SUB/93-21 - A minor subdivision of a 75,625 square foot lot into
two lots of 38,500 square feet and 37,125 square feet. The property is
located at 1030 W. St. Croix Avenue in the RA, Single Family Residential
District. Doug Flory, Applicant.
6. Case No. SUP/V/93-22 - A Special Use Permit and a Variance to the rearyard
and sideyard setback requirements for the conversion of an existing garage
into a second residential structure. The property is located at 119 West
Chestnut Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. John S. Larson,
Applicant.
OTHER BUSINESS
Review of Ordinance establishing the Zoning Board.
Review draft Planning Commission Rules and Procedures.
Review of modification to development program for Development District #1 for
Junior High reuse project.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
Date: March B, 1993
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman
Glenna Bealka, Dorothy Foster, Rob Hamlin,
Kirk Roetman, Don Val.svik, and Darwin Wald
Absent: Duane Elliott and Jay Kimble
Also Present: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Darwin Wald, seconded by Rob Hamlin to approve the
minutes of February B, 1993, as submitted. Carried 7-0.
PUBLIC HEARINi3S
Case N❑. SUP 93-13 - A Special Use Permit to conduct an over -the -
phone and mail order travel agency business out of a residential
structure. The property is located at 1861 Oak Glen Drive in the
RA, Single Family Residential District.
Robert and Vickie Cicolella presented their request. There are
four recommended conditions which the applicants are aware of.
Mr. Cicolella stated that he will be retiring in two years, and
they plan to open their own agency upon his retirement. This is
a way to get established and build up clientele before setting up
their business elsewhere, such as downtown. Their neighbors have
no objections to the request. There were no comments from the
audience members.
Motion by Darwin Wald, seconded by Kirk Roetman 'to approve the
Special Use Permit with four conditions. Following discussion,
Condition No. 4 was amended to read: This permit shall be
reviewed upon a complaint basis or at least annually. Motion
carried 7-0 as amended.
Case No. SUP 93-14 - A Special Use Permit to conduct outdoor
gales from a cart in an existing private courtyard at 324 South
Main Street (Grand Garage) in the CBD, Central Business District.
Vicki A. Poisson presented her request. She is aware of the
condition of approval. She plans to sell only cookies from the
cart. Upon the City's approval, she will be granted a license
from the Department of Agriculture.
Motion by Dorothy Foster, seconded by Darwin Wald to approve the
Special Use Permit. Carried 7-0.
Case No. V SUP 93-15 -- A Variance and Special Use Permit to
1
Stillwater Planning Commission
March 9, 1.993
conduct a three bedroom Bed and Breakfast at 210 East Laurel
Street. The previous permit was rescinded by the City Council
upon request of the applicant in December of: 1992. The property
is located in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Clyde Jorgenson presented his request. lie stated that the house
was renovated to use the front as a Bed and Breakfast. They have
restored as much of the original home as possible. They
requested the Special Use Permit be rescinded temporarily when
mortgaging the home because the interest rate was lower as a
single family home.
Rob Hamlin questioned whether this home meets the ordinance
objectives of preserving older_ structures since there has been
reconstruction of the building. Mr. Jorgenson stated that the
front half of the house is original except for a new porch
railing.
Bruce Brillhart, 319 W. Pine, asked about review by the
Heritage Preservation Commission. Mr. Russell explained that the
HPC will review this request prior to the City Council public
hearing. The applicant met the deadline for the Planning
Commission meeting, but not for the HPC meeting.
Dorothy Foster stated that this is a perfect location for a B&B.
Don Valsvik noted that there are no other B&Bs within the three
block limit.
Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Glenna Bealka to approve the
Variance and Special Use Permit request. Rob Hamlin noted that
because of the history of this building, he is in favor of this
request, but would be negative to any future cases where
buildings are substantially changed. Chairman Fontaine agreed,
but noted that the ordinance was written after this restoration
had taken place. The motion carried 7-0.
Case No. SQP/93-16 - A Special Use Permit to conduct special
events (small weddings, receptions, business meetings, recitals)
out of a residential structure at 319 West Pine Street. The
property is located in the P.B, Two Family Residential District.
Vicki and Bruce Brillhart, owners, presented the case. Mr.
Fontaine noted that this request was previously approved by the
Planning Cormission, then denied by the City Council. An
o-rdinance was then written by a subcommittee of the Planning
Commission, which was subsequently denied by the city Council as
too restrictive. The Council determined that each case should be
decided on its own merit.
4
Stillwater. Planning Commission
March 8, 1993
The Brillharts are in agreement with the 12 conditions of
,approval. Mr. Brillhart noted that they have reduced their
previous request. They have expanded the parking lot to
accomodate 1_0 cars, and have screened the parking lot witil a
fence and shrubs. The home was previously a rental property and
is now a single family home. He has not had a complaint since
opening the business. He has improved the appearance of the
home.
Patricia Jewell Peterson, 320 W. Pine, stated that she has lived
across the street for 45 year; and never had any problems when
the home was an apartment house. She is in possession of a
Petition obtained during the previouS special use permit request,
and she has contacted all these who signed. They wish to remain
Oil the petition and a few more names have been added. They are
opposed to the request because it would be further
commercialization of a residential area.
Vicki Brillhart noted that a petition from neighbors directly
affected by the B&B and who support the request will be submiteed
to the City Council.
Mr. Hamlin stated that he fell business meetings and small
weddings would be private and quiet and would not affect the
neighbors. He asked Mrs. Peterson what sort of activity she
expected that would be disruptive to the neighborhood. She
stated that caterers, florists, delivery trucks, limosines, etc.
would be coming and going.
Pat Medbery, 2.15 W. Pine, stated that she is concerned that there
is so much going on in one area. She was concerned alDo1at the
parking, but is glad to see -the off-street parking.
Jeff Peterson, 320 W. Pine, stated that tie is disturbed about a
meeting and entertainment facility. It will increase the
activity on the weekends when neighbors want to use their yards.
He stated that the City should set some standards regarding what
kinds of businesses should be allowed irl residential
neighborhoods.
Motion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Darwin Wald to approve the
Special Use Permit as conditioned. Carried 7-0.
Don Valsvik suggested that, for future requests of this type,
four special events, and 30 guests should be considered the
maximum.
Case No. ,5UP/98-26 - Annual Review of Special Use Permit and
Report on 1_992 Rivertown Trolley activities.
Robert Raleigh, owner, was present. He stated that he is
continually changing the route in order to keep the local people
3
Stillwater Planning Commission
March 8, 1993
corning ):)ack. The Fte1yht House has written a letter giving
permission to run the business on their property, but Mr. Raleigh
wa;s not able to pick it up today as the Freight House is closed
orI Mondays .
Mr. Raleigh responded to a question about ringing the trolley
1-)ell by saying it is used for safety purposes, He normally rings
it only at intersections and blind corners.
OTHER
Co►n:,r.ehen5ave Flan -
The Commission viewed a videotape of a presentation by the City
of Maplewood's Park and open Space Committee. Mr. Russell
Stated that park,. and open apace will be. part of Stillwater' new
comprehensive plan. It will include guidelines for future
development of open space, protection of the ravines and bluffs,
.and determination of need-s. for additional larks.
Dave Johnson of Stillwater Township wac, present for the
discussion.
U.1URNMEN'.i',
Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Kirk Roetman to adjourn the
meeting at 9:05 p.m. Carried.
Submitted by:
Shelly Schaubach
Recording Secretary
4
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/93-17
Planning Commission Meeting: April 12, 1993
Project Location: 118 Lakeside Drive
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential and Bluffland/Shoreland
Zoning District: RB, B/S
Applicant's Name: Michael and Sheryl Meyer
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description:
The request is construct a 20 ft. by 24 ft. garage with a 12 ft by 8 inch
frontyard setback on lands with a slope of greater than 12% in the Bluffland/
Shoreland District.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to construct an attached two stall garage. A variance is
required because the structure's setback is 12 ft. 8 inches. Using the
frontyard averaging, a provision of the Zoning Ordinance, the frontyeard
requirement is 20 feet.
The Bluffland/Shoreland regulations require the structure be set back 100 feet
from the river's edge and 40 feet from the top of the bluff. The structure
meets those requirements but is constructed on slopes of greater than 12%.
This requires a variance to the Bluff land/Shoreland regulations with review
and certification by the Department of Natural Resources after the City has
reviewed the request.
The applicant has indicated that by moving the garage location it will improve
the drainage/erosion situation of the lot and provide a safer and more
convenient access to the house.
The garage addition will be consistent in appearance with the house addition.
It is recommended that the storage shed located along the top of the bluff be
removed as a condition of this variance approval. No tree cutting or trimming
is proposed.
FINDING
The project will improve the drainage/erosion situation along the bluff of the
river and not significantly impact views of the shoreline from the river.
Case No. V/93-17
Page Two
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The garage addition shall be painted an earth tone color approved by
the City Planner to minimize the structure's impact as viewed from the
river.
2. Gutters and drain spouts shall be installed on the rear (river side) of
the garage directing the rain water to the street.
3. The asphalt driveway leading from the street to the rear of the house
shall be removed and grassy lawn area restored.
4. The shed located on the top of the bluff shall be removed from the
site.
5. The City's variance decision shall be certified by the Commissioner of
Natural Resources before the decision is final.
6. No tree cutting or trimming shall be allowed.
ATTArPMFNTC
CASE NUMBER_
Casa Nurnbor
6
Feo Paid
Date
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property:_
�f �1 � P/cal
Logal'Dosc p on^of Propertyc �'------ /�*�_ SC,•�/l /`�'.:
Owner: Name -----%%;, c 94� / -_-- g --
-------
/ l
Address _ �l _ L , ��c�S'� -t' -- �f-------_-- Phone: -- y3%-�3�ayq - T -
Applicant (if other than owner): dame--_---____-____-_----__--__--___--
Address------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request: ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
___ Spocic�l Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
_Variance ___ Other ..._______________
Description of Re est: -_-`--_-�` =_..
i� C- _ 4zr�Z:�
.
Signature of Applicant:
Date of Public Hearing: -----------------------------------------_---
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of ��is''�oi�ri�/ t-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
r
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set-backs.�+�
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. VL
5. Street names. 4 oJo )
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. rSl� m
7. Other information as may be requested.
Approved __- Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
subject to the following conditions: --------- _--------------------------
Approved __- Denied ___ by the Council on ---____-_-----_- subject to t';e
following conditions: ________..---------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments. (Use other side),
To: Steve Russell
From: Michael and Sheryl Meyer
Subject: Varlance for garage addltlon at 118 Lakeside Drlve
Date: 3-24-93
We would like to build a garage at street level in the location shown on
the survey map. The size would be 20X24 and the elevation drawings you requested
are included. A variance to build closer to the street is being sought.
We have three main reasons for wanting to build the garage at street level.
First is the safety issue, our current driveway is steep and it heads right for
the bluff and a 35 foot drop. During the winter the drive becomes icy and very
dangerous to use. Someone unfamiliar could find themselves sliding over the
bluff as there is nothing to stop them.
Preservation of the bluff is another major concern. Currently the entire
yard between the house and bluff line is asphalt. Every time it rains the
water comes off the house roof and also down the driveway and runs over the bluff
causing errosion of the bluff line.
Our house is the only one in the development that does not have a garage
at street level. We are not asking for anything different than what all the
other houses already have.
Our plans along with building the garage include removing all of the current
asphalt drive and landscaping the yard. This would be replaced with grass
so the water runoff has a chance to soak into the ground instead of eroding the
bluff. We would be making a natural fence of shrubs along the bluff line to
keep people from falling over but also to help hold the soil in place along
the bluff line. Flowers and other landscaping would be done further back from
the bluff.
We will be out of town from 3/26/93 to 4/13/93.
Michael Meyer
w r-
r- U
O c CC)
<
s 4-4) -
a wron
�r000�
n oa)
117 a Q) v) N
J "-� 3 5- a
�-- L a)
c� O 3 (1) n O
T a) C T
+� Lu .- L
a) C L C ro
'a O > a
C M 4 •
Ili O > a) U
O E
L w S- In (1)
tea)
L
fro
a
4- 'o n 4) ro
N C y4- +1 +1 +1
L
U a) O L
+� +-' a) C U 4� +�
C
Y C U a)
o) C-o O C ro 4- 4-
U• 7-+Dl
W
C
O O C ro
•-� "� i- o L
4-) U o
a "O O 4- 41 4�M O"
M O a) +,
< )n O 41 0 v)
,)
C L CT •--�
U ro ro o)-
Cl)
-M.r
4-) a) i-�
+-� N E C C O M oo
ro 4-
L T
o
M �03 o
a• ro T V)
N
`. ro +,
E L a)
N
co
N
4� 4- >,
ro C v) Lam+ ro' I I
O p
oo
a) O CT O +)
+1 a) m• 3 T
Y W
^ CD..
a) v) C ..-,
L ro L L 3 a) ro
V mho
,n
LQ;
s-_ Wvc)
4"M c +� O�>a
C
FZ
LID
o-of
U O a) •.. +> > ro
y
o
T
�
t- C L a) a)
a) 3>
vl C C v)
Ln Z V m h
a) ro
m
., O a) t
E O +)
xzC °v
Cv
U
w a4� 4 c
Jro
+�.nO
•.
)ZnE4�Wo
aa)) c
z
0H4� 4J
L/I E o a) aa)) o.�
x Q m Q d
L •.-.
¢ O a1 ro
C L •-� t a) L L O ro
a 3 z a F-
v)
ati
+ 3 +� ^.
a o +1 +� +1 c n a o
..1 Z
Q
a) J N CL
E a) a) a o ro O
a)J�
a)v))no Uw+1L3 c
(n
oa)
F
r—rooa
a)-caa)2� ccL
ro�
-Hco4-
al, ro ro >,o+�-0 U•-�O
L
C C v) a) C 7 C 74
U •'+
4-
T 2 C a) a)
-+ O C C) V) > (1) n 7 L
-. +�
L
+� O •-+ a
L L of: a) L E •� C
E V)
C)
L O N
ro ..-. W ._ 7 TL C o', O
o • -U 4- -
a) N C s- 'o a) U
'o .
Wm.
O O-o
L
cD _C 4- Co-(--
:x
O
LC L
Y. CL L C
ocna)+�a)
+1= oo•.Coa)o-0-0,
>:a)
-'
L
C.7 +1 C In
4- � ✓7 E a) � +1 L "
U
L C
3 --• U C O U >, L
C
Z Y L L
O m )n L 3 0.0
U
✓'
C J J U i
41 ro O 0) U-0 O+� M
X
<
ro a)
ro U• N C C ro C L o C a
O
U 41 L
C ue ro a) 'o t ••• L 4, C
s:
c
z
�cn s-4-
a) c> 11)— a) U C a) v to n
Z
TiZ a)
L 24- OL nC a) Y. L
C -o-o
O o w O L Z 3 0=) 3 w 2
r
7 ro L C C
p U
H
C)< ro
C
J U > 4- <
Z
O SL9 '7- asld/YJ 1/91y
~� .H -2
1
�-
h
a,5:4
4
M
�
p
I
�I
u
N I
I
,
�
.
ozi F
II)
ti
�
F� 00'Ot
LL
a'N6•/%
nr��
;4
ems 1,.►ad �
y
�rnl/�
7�
ti
+I
r v:
•vvg aroirq lrrno] � � a hP
� � � I azn1 � six7 �•97a I ` hv3
C $ V � o
0
N
--
n � -
V
11
7f-
-,!-O�LL ALL
DESIC 7P4E:; AiNi' WP.RGRS CiR 01MISSIGNiS
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/93-18
Planning Commission Meeting: April 12, 1993
Project Location: 222 West Cherry Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Jeffrey H. Palmer
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A Special Use Permit to conduct a sales office for
fitness equipment out of a
second story of a residential structure.
DISCUSSION:
The proposal is to conduct the sales of fitness
equipment out of a second
story of a garage.
The applicant has stated that a majority of his business would be over -the -
phone. He would take orders, pick up his product at
a warehouse location in
Downtown Stillwater and make the delivery. He has
also stated there would
occasionally be customers coming to his home. This
would be by appointment
only. There is parking in the driveway.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. No more than two (2) customers per week are allowed to the home.
2. All cars shall park on site.
3. No signage is allowed.
4. This permit shall be reviewed on a complaint basis.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval as conditioned.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Application form.
- Site Plan
A !\V •VV
Case Numbo.� =J
Fee Paid
CASE NUMBER Date Filed 3V��
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property:
Logal Doscription of Proporty: wrbro� S�_Qo,c F sa_glk_T/4 nc4 ,t9anTH er, A _
Owner: Name i-'.------?--------------....__..___..__
Address _ '5AMC-- 144 _ vim __----__ Phone: _7��=33710__
Applicant (if other than owner): Name ..._________________-__________.. ---
Address ------------------------------ Phone ----------------
Type of Request: ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
-�L Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
___ Variance ___ Other -------------------
Description oil Request:
�� _�'rr14c�S C,�K3�.1_t'1 ��•� �.l � � _�,�C.�.,s _.Q.�.�� =�� _ A�'°� � °_` - _
4- - - -- - - - -
Signature of AP olicanL� �---
Date of Public Hearing:___W__-----_..___..----_----__..______________
NOTE. Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on b this form or at.
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot." h7AR 1993
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. nPAID
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. G. C�0F3'ijLLWAT5R
5. Street names. S#k WAMR,
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. M"V.
7. Other information as may be requested.
lyIN
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ----------- (duce)
subject to the following conditions: _-_.._____-___________...,..--------_
___________-___r_.,,_____w___w____________________-----______
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the
following conditions: -------------------------------------------------
Comments; (Use other side),
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/93-19
Project Location: 501 North Main Street
Applicant's Name: Marylou Meagher-Gammans
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
Project Description:
A Special Use Permit for a temporary tent structure and signage for the
Stillwater Shakespeare Theatre.
Discussion•
The request is to place a 40 ft. by 60 ft. temporary tent structure for a four
week production of Shakespeare. The site plan shows approximately where the
tent will be located. The entrance to the site will be from Main Street.
Picnic tables will be placed outside the area for intermission.
The parking demand for the use is approximately eighty one (81) parking spaces
according to the Parking Ordinance. The North Main Street lot has 100 parking
spaces and there is plenty of on -street spaces on Main Street. The Zephyr also
uses this lot.
The tent structure is white with a height of sixteen feet. There will be a
225-250 seating capacity.
The Design Review Committee reviewed the proposal for the tent structure and
signage at their regular meeting of April 5, 1993. The Committee did not
comment on the tent structure due to its temporary nature; however, they did
state that the north end of town is visually different from the Historic
District on the south end of town.
The Committee approved the signage with a condition that it be placed fifteen
feet from the sidewalk.
The applicants have also stated they will provide portable restroom
facilities. They will be serving beverages (no alcohol).
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The picnic tables shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee.
2. The sign plan shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee.
3. The occupancy of the tent structure shall be reviewed by the Building
Official.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval as conditioned.
Findings
The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines and Zoning
Ordinance.
Attachments:
- Application
- Letter
- Tent structure
- Photos of the site.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION
CASE NO. SUP/93-19 & DR/93-6
Project Location: 501 North Main Street
Applicant's Name: Marylou Meagher-Gammans
Type of Application: Special Use Permit and Design Review
Project Description:
A Special Use Permit and Design Review for a temporary tent structure and
signage for the Stillwater Shakespeare Theatre.
Discussion•
The request is to place a 40 ft. by 60 ft. temporary tent structure for a four
week production of Shakespeare. The site plan shows approximately where the
tent will be located. The entrance to the site will be from Main Street.
Picnic tables will be placed outside the area for intermission.
No sign plan has been submitted at this time.
The parking demand for the use is approximately eighty one (81) parking spaces
according to the Parking Ordinance. The North Main Street lot has 100 parking
spaces and there is plenty of one -street spaces on Main Street.
The tent structure is white with a height of sixteen feet. There will be a
225-250 seating capacity.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The picnic tables shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee.
2. The sign plan shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee.
3. The occupancy of the tent structure shall be reviewed by the Building
Official.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval as conditioned.
Findings
The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines and Zoning
Ordinance.
Attachments:
- Application
- Letter
- Tent structure
- Photos of the site.
Caso Number
Fee Paid
CASE NUMBER Date Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property:
Logal Doscription of Proportyc ----------------------------------------
Owner: Name !t`,\___-_____-_..__--_
Address --------- Phone:
Applicant (iT other than owner): Name
Ac?uress _�� -__- = t� `?.:# __ Phone:
Jew.-�
Type of Roquest:- __.. Rozoning ..._ Approval of Preliminary Plat
_ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
___ Variance ___ Other -------------------
Description of Request: __--_______....__--___--__--____-__-____--_-____
----_--_-__-_-__...__---------_-___--- M__- ___ -_- _ -- _ -------
.w
Signature of Applicant.
Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------------
NOTE. Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form or at-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (duce)
subject to the following conditions: ____________________________________
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ______________
following conditions:
subject to the
Comments: (Use other side),
Request for a special permit
for Stillwater Shakespeare
The use of Mr. Bill Stouvenal's land is to place a 401x 60'
white tent upon for use in a theatrical production.This event
would be located on the east side of Hwy. 95, just north of
Dominos pizza, and south of the Zephyr and city parking.Boarder-
ing the back end of the lot, parallel to 95, are the railroad
tracks.The production would run from July 15th to August 15th,
with the possible extension of two weeks depending on
demand.Please refer to diagram for entrances and exits.
This application should be granted in direct light of the
recommendations by the St. Croix Valley Task Force.However, the
initial vision of an ongoing repertory theatre, and recognition
of the need preceded any knowledge of the Task Force, or contact
with it.The two were met through a mutual interest in invigorat-
ing and developing this art's community.
In addition to the above proposal, Stillwater Shakespeare
intends to introduce an educational programme to area High
schools, focusing on the dramatic interpretations, including
workshops and discussions.
Presently Stillwater Shakespeare is working as a Non -Profit
501 C-3 status given to us by our fiscal agent, The Task Force.
Potential traffic generation is hard for us to say.Since our
activity is located on the North end of town, we hope to eFAse
some of the congestion from the South end.As far as parking is
concerned, we propose to use the city's parking lot of 150 spaces
which is located to our immediate north on Hwy.95.This presents a
safe and accessible location for patron parking.
The tent colour is white. The dimensions are 401x 60' , and
16' high. The doorway is 7'. The seating will be 225-250.there
will likely be a combination of hay bales and chairs.No tent -
floor will be installed.There will be hay sprinkled on the ground
in the tent to prevent dust kicking up. Miller excavating have
offered their services to fill and level the ground.There will be
a designated smoking area outside, and no smoking inside. No
alcohol will be allowed on the site.There is no water on the
site, but pop drinks and juice will be served. There will be one
Jiffy Biffy which is cleaned every week.The will be garbage cans
were needed. We would like to set up four or five picnic tables
for use at intermission.The nights of performance would be,
Thursday to Sunday with matinee's on Sat & Sun.ProductionC shall
not extend past 10:30 pm. Currently we are planning on live music
without microphones, however this could change. If it did, the
music would be low.
J
Due to the community's positive response, the St. Croix,
Valley Task Force assessment, and because of the encouragement of
local business', we feel that this is an appropriate and neces-
sary project for this community,and surrounding neighbourhoods.
D c( ffDTI 1 o ' 1
R
I
v
E
R
AREA lill9l
For L�d��
.R
{fitTV -F
�.
.1w %W Trees--L_
LAND S CAP'IN G
PARKING
1101
H
I
CT
H
Ti.)
H
i�
y
5
Mc-f `� .�
V
,-S����,��
'�e4�Ii n
ccr
rl/
Pendleton Company
2551 Wimbledon P1.
Woodbury, MN 55125
March 29, 1993
Ann Pung-Terwedo
City Planner
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Stillwater Shakespeare
Dear Ann:
I understand that Mary Lou Meagher will be making application
for a land use permit for operation of a summer theatre.
This letter is to verify with the City of Stillwater that I
have agreed to allow the tent theatre to operate on my land
on North Main Street for several months commencing in April
1993.
This Permission is subject to: A
written lease with The Pendleton
Company and written approval by
the City of Stillwater.
The land area to be made available to this project approximates
9,900 square feet, lying north of the metal rental unit, south
of the municipal parking lot, and from Main Street approximately
110 feet. There will be no provision for off street parking.
It is important to expect that City approval of the theatre
does not in any way limit the usage of prospective tenants at
my buildings.
Sincerely,
William E. Stouvenel
The Pendleton Company
Encl: Boundry Drawing
.�: rf• W�7i�A d-nits
.a ti
'{I s * ` yJt
it
• 1 � 7
�'' x i T v
L i
rB - sz 9. o o �� • IA / �l
Pv
r`V.
t
� r �1 �� .SLAB • �� BLOCy o'r?+a' �!~-ti;rR �� Ir�.
• l J /CJ V �/ 1 � � �t, � J� i7 O
t ,• I
AVk.
,y
7. oa Few le
I do i.Pi 4L4 Prrr �� ►
g s V
` o I � �
�� as -�,�' 1Q'' 4 •��►� V r `�Q
/�•l. � \ ►+ate , �.�� � `.1 !) � h ti ' r
p6.
IA
4
- � .. ly .�V�l. V � t /'��� •' +`' `y4y,,*41r •`�j�•+k �'nY;rM�-y..-+�. £r . � V .. ►�'l
' ' .. f: -•, . Au., � i. ��'-'- � •+^'.7 'Y' •r i ��Y�:i ';�G„ •tom.• �.
,
vt
MOTO
1p
Olt PI
, rt - .;k}i;n• �r 'C'����LRISGGG"' �'.t e
r � - - �i C-T j ,•, 55..4
. -} - - :� '. •' ! ,i , .. 1r fir. ��. x. n�, •_ ;
•.�_�_ �, • _ :s _ ,, r F !.L/f,•yam, •'�'y �' -i':. �
_ � � •p' ems. �• �r•� � '�`�' y•. +'' '1
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/V/93-20
Planning Commission Meeting: April 12, 1993
Project Location: 1600 block of North First Street
Comprehensive District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Robert and Sandra Walters
Type of Application: Variance and Subdivision
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Variance to the lot width requirement to subdivide 22,244 square foot lot into
two lots.
nTSrIlCCTnN
The request is to subdivide a 22,244 square foot lot into two lots of 11,122
square feet each. The proposed lot meets the minimum 10,000 square foot lot
area requirements and the 100 foot lot depth requirement. Seventy five feet
width is required for each lot, 74.17 feet is proposed, resulting in a .83
inch variance for each lot.
The applicant has included with his application a house plan that would be
constructed on the north lot. The house plan would have to be modified to
accommodate the westward slope of the lot.
FINDING:
The proposed lot split meets the lot area (10,000 single family) requirements
of the district.
CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
1. The site contours shall be maintained with the development of both
lots (no major grading).
ATTAr.HMFNTS
Caso Numbory J _,�O _
'
Fee Paid __ 14_-J__-__-
CASE NUMBER_ Date Filed �Iljlf3 -----
PLANNING A.DMINIS T RAT IVF FORUM
��xx -
i Cr A/
Street Location of Property: _ __________________-_-_-
Logal Doscription of Property: Lr_3_ � -3+ CARi-i 4 S�,NUt- 13EF.G�S-/ tVi'rw/\!
Owner. Name ----------
Address /5-/__ ---- - �_--- Phone:
Applicant (if other than owner): NameEN_^���Z.
Address 1�� Qt( (�C.l__ FZv1�., nl__�tr�.c��_ Phone: y 29_L 7��-----
Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
___ Special Use Permit -__ Approval of Final Plat
_Variance _ v01har..5!
�• t i
Description o, Reques,•. _7
Signature of Applic t: ��n
Date of Public Hearing:
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on r
� bl
at-
tached, showing the following:
1.
North direction.PPkiD
2.
Location of proposed structure on lot.
3.
Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
, CJTYOf
4.
Dimensions of proposed structure.
.5'pv'yYATM
5.
Street names.
6.
Location o: adjacent existing buildings.
7.
Other information as may be requested.
-- -
Approved -__ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ----------- (duta)
subject to the following conditions: -__-__
______________________f___-_____-__-_------------------____-----_-
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ sublet: to the
rollowing conditions:_-__-__--_w_-____-_--_____--___-- __-_-___
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other side),
April 1, 1993
Dear City of Stillwater Planning Commission,
The enclosed papers contain our request to :
1) Split one city lot roughly 150' x 150' into 2 lots
2) Request a variance of less than one foot in the width of the 2
lots - from 75' to just over 74'
Briefly here is the important data:
Lot dimensions East
South
West
North
148.33' (North 1st St. side)
149.95'
148.35'
149.97'
Average lot width = 148.34', 74.17' after split
The variance in width if for 0.83' less than the 75' minimum.
( 10")
Total lot sq/ft is 22,244; 11,122 per lot after the split.
I've enclosed pictures of the lot and a sheet describing the home we'd like
to build. The appraised value would be consistent with the neighborhood.
If you have any questions please contact me at 439-8784, or call the
Walters. Thanks for your consideration in this matter!
Sincerely,
Ken Bjo
m t
LOT r ►� ►zZ 4�
1y$�35'
LOT I� IZ,2
UA6ANT LAJD
5+�
&W&C-
�fdVSE
E--
Rr c.E�T
Fr2 M '7
148,33
NaRTN
ST
N �
tD
4'+ C
N
z
a O
to rt
U1 fD
O ..
rt
N N
ro I
rt N
N• w
O I
a co
rD
In
rD
rD
rt
N
ro
n
O
ro
0
to
p
3 ro
V) W
n
n
fD
N
v
lb
No• S�co.vlo Sr.
* n •Ca<9t.7/
ti•,yr -- M /QR 37
Z 23—
�► � I r
t
g o�
`°
h O
M
A
r
N
9 •a eb
cr
El
►n
fi
�dC GeV
n
r ei
ei
ev
7 0
a�
N
o p N
01 i
• 1976 sq. ft. The WILLIANtssuRG is a classic colonial style home with
• 484 sq. ft. garage a spacious floorplan, including an open kitchen with a
• 4 bedrooms center island, an expansive family room, formal living
• z'iz baths and dining areas, and an attached double garage with a
separate mud room. There are four bedrooms upstairs,
including a master bedroom with a large walk-in closet
and a private bath. It's a comfortable and functional
home with lots of windows for a bright and cheerful
interior environment.
MILES HOMES
-1,11, Nw
. . . .. . . .....
WR w
..... -----
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/93-21
Planning Commission Meeting: April 12, 1993
Project Location: 1030 W. St. Croix Avenue
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Doug and Beverly Flory
Type of Application: Minor Subdivision.
Project Description:
The request is to subdivide a 75,625 square foot lot into two lots of 38,500
square feet and 37,125 square feet.
Discussion:
The proposal is to subdivide a 75,625 square foot lot into two lots.
Presently, the proposed west parcel has a single family home on the property.
With this subdivision, it is proposed that another home be constructed on the
lot to the west.
The parcel does not have sanitary sewer service or water service. If this
subdivision is approved, both properties should be connected to City services.
The Public Works Director has stated sewer services would have to come from
Amundson Drive adjacent to the property to the south.
The Water Department has not commented on the project.
St. Croix Avenue is not an improved street and does provide access to two
homes to the south and the home of the applicant.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The proposed home and existing home shall connect to City services.
2. St. Croix Avenue shall be improved appropriately to City standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval as conditioned meets the intent of the Subdivision Ordinance and
Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Application Form
- Site Plan
- Legal Description.
Caso Numbory3 :,2-/
G
Fee Paid __
CASE NUMBER Date Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property: A-�-e :_________
Legal Description of Property: ALI Crib.�___________________________
Owner. Name _ Q
Address -L-Phone:
Applicant (if other than owner): Name _________-_w__
Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
___ Spocial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
Variance _✓ her
Description of Request:
Signature of Applicant:r1�_ _
Date of
Public hearing: ________.._____________________________-______
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawa,on ba '} rr;, or at-
tached, showing the following: - ��a,'. •3r7
1. North direction. = j3
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. ^'r'
3. Dlme^.510^.S of i.vaat and SIde ul:l-Ui1ci.J. ►�v
PAID
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. «.���R
5. Street names. c -F77i W47&S,
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information. as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (duce)
subject to the following conditions:__--._-...__-_...w__--___________________
---------------------------T-----------------------------------------------
�� Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the
following conditions: _ __w____-_-____________________-__-_--_-___-__
_---_-_....__________________________.._______-----___-_-____________-
Comments: (Use other side),
6
r
cr
E�-LS T-71��ti
2-4
' I nQs--n�-r,
FAD f
s 1"
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/V/93-22
Planning Commission meeting: April 12, 1993
Project Location: 119 West Chestnut Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicant's Name: Jeffrey Anderson
Type of Application: Variance and Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Special Use Permit and a Variance for the restoration of a Carriage House
and the addition of a residential unit.
DISCUSSION
The proposal
is to restore
a Carriage House and
allow for a second residential
unit above the accessory structure..
Presently,
the main house is a duplex;
however, the
applicant is
restoring the home
for a single family use. Two
residential
units on this
25,200 square foot
lot does meet the lot area
requirements
for this zoning
district.
The Carriage House garage on the first level will provide the parking for both
units. No on -street parking is recommended because the property is adjacent to
Fourth Street which is quite narrow.
The Variance requests are to the sideyard setback (thirty feet required, less
than five feet proposed) and to the rearyard setback requirement (five feet
required, less than five feet proposed) for this reconstruction project.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Any residential parking shall remain on -site.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposal meets the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Survey
- Elevation of Carriage House
- Floor Plan
- Letter from John S. Larson.
CASE NUMBER
Case Nur'bor
J�
Fee Paid
Date Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property: c{
--------
Logal Doscription of Proportyt �__�-�! �._�=1 ..-�r-- ------ ,
Owner: fame - __ ____ ___ __ _ __-- -- -----------------
Address
1
Applicant (if other than owner): Nan e
Address �'_/J1_ _ _, __ �-- -- Phone:
Typo of Request:-, ^ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
4 Variance _ O1her ____ _ --_ _______
D cri ;ion of Request. .. _ _ --w ___-_ _ _ _ _____
Signature of Applicant:
Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------------
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be draysrn•on back of this form or at-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction. 1.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
oFZj =
c--; gel ' ;•�!. � � `.:
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the*Planning Commission on .._-'- (duce)
subject to the following conditions: ___________
-------`"--_------___--w-.----_------------.-.'-_-___----•-------------
Approved
___ Denied ___
by the Council on ________________
subject to the
following
conditions. ____
--------------------------------------------
Comments. (Use other side),
LAKE &LAND JAMES E. DANLEY R.L.S. President
1296 HUDSON ROAD
SURVEYING INC. ST. P776-82 5ti108
778 „
EXCLUSIVELY FOR:
JOHN LARSON
DESCRIBED AS:
LOTS 8, 9 AND 10, BLOCK 31, ORIGINAL TOWN OF STILLWATER
1-1
W
LU
Cn
AREA
25252 SQ FT
0.58 ACRES
1
CHESTNUT STREET
r - -- PUBLIC WALK 6 STAIRS _
FENOE y�y1 a� }
IRON X� -
�x M
` N72°24'27'E 150.00 --
_
1 1 i•
11 3
1�
PORCH
10 I I
it
� �
c
�04 1
RLS
vvv
Q� r,
#13774
1
co
�W
o�
/ - a
c+1
I v
8 h0 tr
/ N
Ap,r.1yDK i
DUMPSTER 8 SIDED ENCROACH FROM
/ SOUTH 6 EAST ON THIS CORNER '
S72°27'26"W 150.00
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a du Registered
Land Survey s the State of
finder the laws
l
BY
MI R.L.S. NO. 14887 r�
on the 10TH day of MAAl'_H _ 19 93
This certificate vali.? only to party named
hereon when stamped with impression seal.
7
- RLS
N13774
1
3
4
SCALE: 1" = 30 FEET
BOOK LF PAGE FILE NO.
O Indicates Iron Monument Set 5 Marked
R.L.S. 14807
•Indicates Iron Monument Found, Set By
Others
Bearings Are on an Assumed Basis
Improvements Located Only When Requested
DES.= DESCRIBED REC.= RECORD MEA.= MEASURED
DESCRIPTION: FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY
SHEET OF swEaya
JOHN S. LARSON & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS
2 April 1993
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minn.
55082
Dear Mr. Russell
As the Architects for the Jeffrey and Julie Anderson home
and carriage house restoration/renovation at 119 West
Chestnut Street in Stillwater, we have been asked by the
Andersons to seek approval from the City of Stillwater for
the reconstruction of the upper level of the carriage house
and it's conversion to a one bedroom apartment.
The carriage house, which we believe was built in the late
eighteen hundreds and at about the same time as the house,
originally contained three levels. The top level was
removed at some point, and it is our desire to return the
building to it's original appearance by replacing that
level.
We understand that due to the location of the building on
the property and because of current height and parking
restrictions, variances will be required. The intent of
this letter is to request that the necessary variances be
granted.
Drawings are enclosed that indicate what the finished
building will look like and how it will be used. It's the
Anderson's intention to employ a full time person to provide
help with child care and other domestic work. The apartment,
is to be for that person's use.
The middle or garage level provides parking for three cars
and the lower level is to be used for storage of lawn and
other equipment.
Should you have any additional questions concerning this
request, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely:
John S. Larson, AIA
241 NORTH THIRD STREET BAYPORT, MINNESOTA 55003 612-439-4022
Y c��_---- ..3 -4,
_ --•- ~— . .'.. � �--._ --- - - - - -_ _.— 5}lll=,r:t;: Tc MACH No'�: E
1 ,r. -
jj
- --------- (ATTERNED SuINGLE5
Tv MnTc►i No., SF-
,L�—
EAST ELEVATION 5C A L E. Y.
- WGOD TFIXA TO MATCH } Ov'
li •
I
WEST 'ELEVATION S C A
- - -• • — SToNi= TO MATCH )^TI,`ING
SOUTH ELEVATION 6c A L E % -- )'•o'•
4-
qN
NORTH ELEVATION I • S
[water
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
MEMORANDUM
TO: CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 8, 1993
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING A
ZONING BOARD
The City Council at their meeting of March 16, 1993,
passed for first reading an ordinance that establishes the
Planning Commission as the Zoning Board for certain
planning applications. A copy of the ordinance is
attached. State law requires that amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance be reviewed by the Planning Commission.
The new ordinance would establish the Planning Commission
as the final decision making authority for the City. The
decision of the Commission will e final unless the
decision is appealed by the aggrieved person to the City
Council. Because of their added responsibility and
authority, Staff has prepared Rules and Procedures that
would provide the basis for the Zoning Board (Planning
Commission) deliberation.
The attached Ordinance is a rough draft and will have to
be changed to be consistent with the City Zoning
Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
This item has been referred to the Planning Commission by
the City Council for review and comment.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE CREATING
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN:
I. Creating. There is hereby created a new chapter of the
Stillwater City Code that shall hereafter be known as Chapter 32,
Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Chapter 32 shall hereafter read
as follows:
"CHAPTER 32
1. BOARD CREATED. There is hereby created a Board of
Adjustment and Appeals. The Planning Commission as created and
comprised by the ordinances and City Code of the City, shall be the
Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Staff services for the Board
shall be furnished by the office of the Community Development
Director.
2. PROCEDURE. A majority of the Board shall constitute a
quorum and a majority of all the members as necessary for any
decision of the Board. Subject to the provisions of this
ordinance, the Board may adopt rules necessary to the conduct of
its affairs, the chairman, or in his absence, the acting chairman,
may administer oath to witnesses. All meetings shall be open to
the public. The Board shall keep minutes of its proceedings,
showing the vote of each member upon each question or as absent or
failing to vote. The Board shall keep records of its examinations
and other official actions.
3. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD. The Board shall have the
power and duty of hearing and deciding, subject to appeal to the
City Council and herein provided, appeals or requests in the
following cases:
a. Appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any
order, requirement, decision or determination made by an
administrative officer in the enforcement of the zoning
ordinance.
b. Requests for variances from the literal provisions of the
zoning ordinance in instances where their strict
requirement would cause undo hardship because of the
circumstances unique to the individual property under
consideration.
C. Requests for variances from the literal provisions of the
subdivision ordinance in instances where their strict
enforcement would cause undo hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under
consideration.
d. Requests for special use permits or conditional use
permits where the use is expressly permitted by the
zoning ordinance within the zoning district.
4. HEARING AND DECISION BY THE COUNCIL. The Council shall,
at its next regular meeting after the filing of an appeal to it
from a decision of the B , set a date for hearing thereon which
shall be not later tha 3❑ days after the meeting. After hearing
the oral or written views of all interested peroons, the Council
shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified
future meeting thereof.
5. FORM OF ACTION TAKEN IN RECORD .THEREOF. The Board and the
Council on appeal shall provide for a record of its proceedings
which shall include the minutes of its meetings, and the action
taken on each matter by it, including its final order. The City
Clerk shall maintain a permanent record of the disposition of all
appeals to the Council from decisions of the Board."
II. Saving. In all other ways the Stillwater City Code shall
remain in full force and effect.
III. Publication and Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in
full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
according to law.
Enacted this day of March, 1993.
Charles M. Hooley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk
MAGNUSON & THOLE
LAW OFFICE
LICENSED IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN
THE GRAND GARAGE & GALLERY 324 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE #260 P.O. BOX 438
TELEPHONE: (612) 439-9464 TELECOPIER: (612) 439-5641
April 2, 1993
DAVID T. MAGNUSON
ERIC C. THOLE
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Creation of Board of Adjustment and Appeals
Dear Steve:
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Legal Assistants
Gall A. Mahr
Shelley L.Sundberg
The creation of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals will require an
amendment to the zoning ordinance and contrary to other ordinances,
the Minnesota Statutes contain specific directions about its
amendment.
Minnesota Statutes S 462.357, Subd. 4, requires that if the
amendment to the zoning ordinance is not "initiated by the Planning
Agency", it shall be referred to the Planning Agency for study and
report and may not be acted upon by the governing body until it has
received the recommendation of the Planning Agency or until 60 days
have elapsed from the date that the report was submitted to them.
Accordingly, we have no choice but to send the proposed amendment,
once decided upon, to the Planning Commission for its review. Call
me if there are any questions about this.
Yours very truly,
David T. M nuson
DTM/sls
cc: Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator
Mayor and City Council
1
water
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
MEMORANDUM
TO: CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 8, 1993
SUBJECT: RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF
PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS
The City Council has directed Staff to prepare the
necessary Ordinances and Procedures to establish a Zoning
Board. The Zoning Board would be the Planning Commission
as it relates to planning requests (i.e. variances,
special use permits, subdivisions, etc.). Only appeals
from the decision of the Zoning Board would be heard by
the City Council.
Because the deliberation of the Commission will become
more important and come under more scrutiny, it is
important that the Planning Commission (Zoning Board) have
written out procedures to insure consistency in reviewing
the various planning requests. The attached resolution
details Rules and Procedures for the Commission. They are
presented for your review, comment, and adoption.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adoption of Planning Commission Rules and Procedures.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
NAME
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
PLANNING COMMISSION RULES AND PROCEDURES
ADOPTED UNDER AUTHORITY OF STILLWATER MUNICIPAL CODE
AND STATUTES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING RULES AND PROCEDURES
GOVERNING THE ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER
f 'lei 4�1F VA a 4
1. The name of this organization shall be the Planning Commission of
the City of Stillwater hereinafter referred to as the Planning
Commission.
ARTICLE II
POWERS AND DUTIES
1. The Planning Commission has the following duties and powers:
a. Hear and decide matters relating to the application of the
zoning ordinance and as assigned to the Commission.
b. Hear and decide matters relating to the application of the
subdivision ordinance and as assigned to the Commission.
C. Hear and decide appeals from decisions of the Community
Development Director or City Planner.
d. Develop and maintain the Comprehensive Plan and specific or
area plans and policies.
e. Undertake studies in the area of zoning and planning and make
recommendations to the City Council and other city
organizations.
f. Review the Capital Improvements Program.
g. Develop and maintain the zoning and subdivision ordinances.
h. Perform such other functions as the City Council may assign.
ARTICLE III
MEMBERSHIP AND TERM OF OFFICE
1. Membership, term of office and procedures for removal of members and
the filling of vacancies shall be as established by Stillwater
Municipal Code and by City Council directions.
2. The Chair shall notify the Mayor when any Commission member has three
(3) consecutive absences without notification and/or been absent with
notification for more than six (6) regular meetings per year.
1
3. Commission members shall notify the Chair or the Secretary to the
Planning Commission in advance of any planned absence.
ARTICLE IV
!)PVTr 1l C
1. As soon as is practicable following the first (1st) day of January
of every year, there shall be elected from among the membership of
the Commission, a Chair and a Vice Chair.
2. The Community Development Director is designated to act as Secretary
to the Planning Commission.
3. Should a vacancy occur in the office of the Chair or Vice Chair prior
to the next annual election of officers, a special election shall
be held to fill that office for the duration of the unexpired term.
ARTICLE V
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
1. Any member may nominate a candidate from the membership for the
position of Chair or Vice Chair; nominations need not be seconded.
2. Each member may vote for any eligible person whether nominated or
not.
3. A member may withdraw his/her name, if placed in nomination and
announce that, if elected, he/she would not be able to serve; but
he/she may not "withdraw in favor of another member".
4. Once the nomination are completed, any member may move that the
nominations be closed; a second is required.
S. Unless a majority opposes, the Chair then declares that the
nominations are closed; and the members proceed to the election.
6. The voting may be by ballot or by voice vote.
7. The candidate who received a majority of the votes cast than holds
the office of the Chair.
8. The same procedure is followed for the election of Vice Chair.
9. New officers shall assume office at the next meeting.
ARTICLE VI
DUTIES OF OFFICERS
1. The Chair shall preside at all regular meetings and hearings and
2
shall call special meetings of the Planning Commission.
2. Except those matters controlled by statute, ordinance and these rules
and procedures the Chair shall decide on all points of order and
procedure during the meetings; and his/her decision shall be final
unless overruled by a majority of the members present.
3. The Chair shall sign all official minutes of meetings upon Planning
Commission approval.
4. The Chair shall represent the Planning Commission before the City
Council whenever the Chair or the Commission considers it necessary
or desireable.
5. The Vice Chair shall assume all Commission duties of the Chair in
his/her absence or disability.
6_ In case of the absence of both the Chair and the Vice Chair from any
meeting, an Acting Chair shall be elected from among the members
present.
7. The Secretary shall receive and file all exhibits, petitions,
documents or other materials presented to the Commission in support
of, or in opposition to, any question before the Commission.
8. The Secretary shall sign all notices prepared in connection with
Planning Commission business and shall attest to such records of
actions, transmittals and referrals as may be necessary or required
by law.
ARTICLE VII
rnMMTmmFFc
1. All committees of the Planning Commission which may be deemed
necessary to carry out the functions and purposes of the Commission
shall be established by the Chair or by a majority vote of the
Commission.
2. The Chair shall serve as an ex-officio member of all committees.
3. The Chair shall make all committee assignments and shall appoint the
Chair of each committee.
4. Committee meetings shall be held upon call of the Chair of the
committee.
5. A verbal or written report may be made at any meeting of the
Commission by the Chair or a member of a committee on any subject
under consideration by a committee; or a report may be requested by
the Chair of the Commission.
3
ARTICLE VIII
MEETINGS - GENERAL
1. All regular, work session, special and adjourned meetings of the
Commission shall be open meetings to which the public and the press
shall be admitted.
2. Notice of meetings shall be given as required by law; and the purpose
of, or the business to be transacted during, such meetings shall be
stated in the notice.
A. Re ular Meetings
1. Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held on the second
(2nd) Monday of each month and shall be evening meetings
beginning at 7 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall of
the City of Stillwater. Meetings shall be adjourned by 10:30
p.m., unless the Chair, with concurrence of the Commission,
extends the time of the adjournment.
2. In the event that the scheduled date for a regular meeting
falls on a holiday, such meeting may be rescheduled; the exact
date and time of such rescheduled meeting shall be determined
at the preceding regular meeting.
3. If a majority of the membership deems it necessary or
desirable, a scheduled regular meeting may be cancelled or
rescheduled at the preceding regular meeting, unless a public
hearing has been noticed previously.
B. Work Session Meetings
1. Work session meetings of the Planning Commission may be held
from time to time. The exact date and time of such meetings
shall be determined at the preceding regular meeting.
2. In the event that the date scheduled for a work session meeting
falls on a holiday, such meeting may be rescheduled or may be
cancelled; such action shall be taken at the preceding regular
meeting.
3. If a majority of the membership deems it necessary or
desirable, a scheduled work session meeting may be cancelled
or rescheduled at the preceding regular meeting.
4. No final action shall be taken at a work session on any matter
which is required by law to be the subject of a public hearing
or which is the subject of any application or appeal pending
before the Commission.
C. Special Meetings
4
1. A special meeting may be called by the Chair or a majority of
the membership.
D. Site Tour
QUORUM
1. Planning Commission members may convene to inspect sites of
applications before the Commission in order to familiarize
themselves with the existing conditions of the site.
ARTICLE I%
1. A quorum shall consist of five ( 5 ) members of the Planning Commission
for all matters.
2. In the absence of a quorum at any meeting, such meeting shall be
adjourned to the next regular meeting date by any member present;
or, if no member is present, by the Secretary of the Planning
Commission; or if the Secretary is absent, by the Recording
Secretary.
3. No meeting may be declared adjourned for lack of a quorum until a
15-minute period, after the scheduled time of the meeting, has
elapsed.
ARTICLE %
CONDUCT OF MEETINGS
1. At the time and place established for a meeting and with a quorum
present, the Chair shall call the meeting to order.
2. The normal order of business shall be as follows:
a. Roll call.
b. Approval of minutes of previous meetings.
C. Oral Communications - The Planning Commission will hear brief
(3-minute maximum per topic) oral communications on items not
listed on the agenda.
d. Consent calendar - These are regular items scheduled on the
Commission agenda which are recommended for approval or
continuance by staff.
e. Public hearings - These are items that require public hearings.
f. Unfinished business - Review of recommendation on old or
unfinished business and action on same.
5
MnTTnNS
VOTING
g. New business - Including, but not limited to planning items
that do not require a public hearing.
h. Motions and voting.
ARTICLE XI
1. Upon conclusion of discussion on a matter or at such time as any
member may feel that all points have been sufficiently reviewed, the
Chair may call for a motion or one may be offered by a member. In
the event no motion is offered, the Chair may offer a motion.
2. The Chair shall receive all motions and shall call for a second to
the motion if none has been made.
3. If, after a reasonable time, no second has been offered, the motion
shall be declared dead for lack of second, and this shall be so
stated by the Chair.
4. After a motion has been made and seconded, the Chair shall call for
discussion on the question. All discussion shall be limited to that
of the motion only. At the close of discussion, the Chair shall put
the matter to a vote.
5. The Chair may, at his/her discretion, limit debate on any motion;
except that each member shall have the opportunity to speak at least
twice on each motion for a period of not more that five (5) minutes
at a time. If a member has already spoken on a motion, the Chair
may restrict that member to five (5) minutes.
6. Should a motion fail to pass, the Chair shall so state and call for
a new motion on the matter.
ARTICLE XXI
1. All questions shall be resolved be roll call vote; except that the
Chair may, at his/her discretion, call for a voice vote. Should any
member request a roll call vote, either before or immediately after
a voice vote, a roll call shall be taken without further discussion.
2. Upon acceptance of a motion and completion of discussion thereon,
the Chair may instruct the Secretary to read the motion and to poll
the membership for a vote.
3. All votes shall be verbally stated by each member at "Aye" or "No"
and shall be so entered into the minutes of the meeting. Should
he/she so desire, a member shall be given an opportunity to state
0
the reasons his/her vote, which reasons shall also be entered into
the minutes.
4. A member may be permitted to abstain from voting only when he/she
has a disqualifying conflict of interest or bias in the matter; and,
where he/she is aware of such disqualifying interest or bias, he/she
shall state his/her disqualification upon call of the matter on the
agenda. If a member becomes aware of a disqualifying interest or
bias during the hearing of the matter, he/she shall immediately so
indicate. A disqualified member shall not participate in discussion
or voting in the matter.
5. Adoption of a motion shall be by a simple majority of the members
present, except as otherwise provided herein.
6. The Chair shall vote on all matters, except where he/she has a
disqualifying interest or bias.
7. A tie vote, taken during the absence of one or more members or a
vacancy on the Commission shall automatically continue any item to
the next meeting.
8. A tie vote, resulting from the abstention of one or more members,
with no members absent and no vacancies on the Commission, shall
automatically result in the defeat of the motion.
9. All questions, except those failing as a result of a tie vote
pursuant to Section 8 of this Article, shall be resolved by the
affirmative passage of a motion. Should a motion fail to pass by
a majority vote, the Chair shall declare that the motion has failed
to carry; and he/she shall call for a new motion on the matter.
C_1;4kyUNM—A"001
ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
1. All oral communications between members of the Commission and those
seeking to convey any information relevant to any matter of
Commission business shall take place at a public meeting of the
Commission.
2. Written communications with members of the Commission must be
submitted to the Staff of the Community Development Department prior
to the agenda deadline, in order that it may be included in the
agenda packet.
3. Letters or other forms of written communication received by Staff
after the deadline shall, whenever possible, be duplicated for the
individual Commission members and distributed at the meeting. If
this is not possible, the original correspondence shall be voted by
the Staff or the Chair during consideration of the matter.
7
ARTICLE XIV
POINTS OF ORDER
1. All points not covered by these bylaws shall be determined by
Robert's Rules of Orders.
AWI!ICLE XV
TMV71 ilMV?.TTQ
1. These bylaws may be amended from time to time as the need may arise,
by resolution adopted by the favorable vote of a four -fifths (4/5)
majority of the full membership of the Planning Commission.
ARTICLE XVI
ADOPTION OF RULES AND PROCEDURES
1. Immediately upon favorable vote of not less than four -fifths (4/5)
of the full membership of the Planning Commission, these rules and
procedures shall become in full force and effect; thereby
invalidating any and all provisions of previously adopted rules or
procedures which may be, totally or in part, in conflict herewith.
2. These rules shall not be considered or construed as superseding any
ordinance or directive of the City Council, nor shall they preclude
and preparation and adoption of further procedural manuals and
policies by which the Planning Commission may direct its activities.
Approved this day of , 1993.
Attest:
Community Development Director
A
Chair
Vice Chair
1 wate,
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
MEMORANDUM
TO: CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 8, 1993
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATION AND
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #6 FOR CONSISTENCY WITH
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Redevelopment law required the use of Tax Increment Funds
be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
This review and modification to the Development Program is
for the renovation and reuse of the east wing to the
Junior High and the City's demolition of the west wing and
construction of a 150 - 180 car parking lot to provide
parking for the office use, surrounding area, and Down-
town.
The proposed office use is consistent with the Public
Administrative Offices District (PA) Zoning District. This
zoning was established as implementation of the Downtown
Plan. The new public parking lot would provide parking for
the east wing office use during the work day, the adjacent
churches and courthouse after the normal work day and
weekends. During Summer weekends visitors to the Downtown
would use the facility.
The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and zoning use of the site and area. (The specific plans
for the Junior High Building renovation and parking lot
come to the Commission for design review at your May
meeting.)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Development Program Modification Plans and
establishment of Tax Increment District #6 as consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan (resolution attached).
ATTACHMENT:
Plans.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION OF THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDING THE CITY'S MODIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMEN I
PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, THE MODIFIED
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NOS. 1 THROUGH 5, AND THE
PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR PROPOSED
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 6, ALL LOCATED
THEREIN, TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN OF THE CITY.
WHEREAS, the City's proposed modification of the Development Program for
Development District No. 1, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax
Increment Financing District Nos. 1 through 5 and the Tax Increment Financing
Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 6, respectively, within
Development District No. 1 have been submitted to the Stillwater Planning
Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134
and Section 469.175, Subd. 3 (c), respectively and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Modified
Development Program, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and the Tax
Increment Financing Plan (together, the "Plans") to determine the consistency
of the Plans to the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stillwater Planning Commission,
that the Plans are consistent with the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted: April 12, 1993.
Chairman
ATTEST:
r
�`-�1'ik�1 � :��I•� ��?� 1II(L 11 � � 'I�j'. r'�;��uti. � ' -�
1�lir�{''Ll
;II�H'HCtt:...1�Ri�»'..�3f�'�• ;r, j• �• r y +L �ti 1
^.F: .} " ��ii� /.;- LL'r� r. }. • L. If...:, EIFE iL1�L1.1w:J4.^ f
i, lf����,-,,�.,�1 tX, y�R'��.`f 1 r"• ......'-�� `� 3 `FI �11
� Lf�F3 1 u, „I'� .
LEE!
1�.6 `fit
M041111kCC QQ v 1e/o,o />y !/) r-
O�37xIq
CITY OF
STI LLWATER, M I\ \ ESOTA
SECTION II.
MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
(Downtown and Industrial Park
Scattered Site Redevelopment District)
(AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989)
NOTE: As of February 21, 1989, the City has determined to
implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment
financing districts located within Development District No. 1. Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1 was established and its Tax
Increment Financing Plan was approved on May 7, 1985. The Tax
Increment Financing Plan was subsequently modified on October 1,
1985, December 12, 1985, November 3, 1987 and February 21, 1989.
This Section II is provided to combine all modifications into one
document. Attached as Exhibits IIA, II-B, II-C and 1ID are
portions of the original plan and modifications through November 3,
1987, which are not required to be provided in the Tax Increment
Financing Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175,
subdivision 1, and therefore are not reflected in this Section II.
Subsection 2.1. Statement of Objectives_ See Section I,
Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1,
Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives.
Subsection 2.2. DevelopmentProgram. See Section I,
Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1,
Subsections 1.1 through 1.15.
Subsection 2.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1. The following parcels located in the
City of Stillwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota:
(AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985)
Parcel Identification
Number
9028-0020
9028-0050
9033-2364
9033-2374
9033-2378
10200-2300
10200-2325
10200-2350
10200-2550
10690-2000
10690-2050
10690-2150
10690-4050
Fee Owner
Muller Boat Works
Maple Island Farm, Inc.
UFE, Inc.
Beim Construction Company
H & I Wood Specialties
Goetz, James B.
Goetz, James B.
Kern, 0.; Skinner, N.; et al
Meisterling, Orn & Powell
Atwood Forge & Foundry Co.
McGuire, Michael G.
Muller Boat Works
ABS Co.
2-1
SECTION VII.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 6
Project Summary
The tax increment revenues_ generated through new
development in Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 (Cub Foods
Project) will be used to induce the redevelopment of a portion of
the former Stillwater Junior High School in order to preserve an
historic building within the City. It is anticipated that
Stillwater School District #834 will convey the property to Cub
Foods, who in turn will convey the west wing to the City of
Stillwater. Cub Foods will renovate and rehabilitate the east wing
for use as its corporate offices. The City will demolish the west
wing and convert the property into a public parking lot which will
provide parking to the east wing as well as the general public.
Subsection 7.1. Statement of Objectives. See Section I,
Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1,
Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives.
Subsection 7.2. Development Program. See Section I,
Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1,
Subsection 1.1 through 1.15.
Subsection 7.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment
Financing District No. 6. ^The following parcels located in the
City of Stillwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota:
The West Wing
Lots 3 through 12 inclusive, Lot 2, except the North it feet of the
East 70 feet thereof, all in Block 36 of the original Town, now
City of Stillwater, according to the perfected plat thereof on file
and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington
County, Minnesota, including all that property lying between Lots
15 through 22, Block 35 and Lots 3 through 6, Block 36, original
Town, now City of Stillwater, according to the perfected plat
thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder,
subject to an easement for street and municipal utilities created
by the dedication of Third Street.
The East_ Wing
Lots 8 through 22 inclusive and that part of Lot 7 described as
follows: Beginning on the South West corner thereof, thence North
along the West line a distance of 14.8 feet to a point, thence in
a straight line 150 feet more or less to a point on the East line
thereof that is 13.8 feet North of the South East corner thereof,
thence South along the East line to the South East corner thereof,
thence West along the South line thereof to the point of beginning;
7-1
all in Block 35 of the original Town, now City of Stillwater,
according to the perfected plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota.
FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO
BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 6 CAN BE
OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
Subsection 7.4. Parcels in Acquisition, Properties
identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order to
accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce
blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of
blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsafe, and
unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards;
provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities;
remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental
uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or
redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in
this plan.
The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified
in Section I, Subsection 1.14 of the Development Program.
The following are conditions under which properties not
designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date:
(1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication,
condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in
order to achieve the objectives of the tax increment
financing plan; and
(2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is
assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and
related costs.
Subsection 7.5. Development -Activity in the Tax
rnC.:rement Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed.
The following contracts have been entered into by the City of
Stillwater and the persons named below:
(As Contracts are entered into with the City of
Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.)
Subsection 7.6. Other Specific Development Expected to
Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District. The City
anticipates that the following development will occur within Tax
Increment Financing District No. 6:
(1) renewal and renovation of the east wing of the
historic Stillwater Junior High School by Cub Foods
to be used as its corporate offices; and
7-2
(2) construction of a parking lot on the former west
wing of the site.
(As other specific development is expected to occur, it
will be inserted into this Subsection.)
Subsection 7.7. Estimated Cost of Project. See
Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs
associated with the Development District.
Subsection 7.8. Estiimated Amount of Bonded lndehLedness .
It is anticipated that bonded indebtedness may be incurred in an
amount so that $ in net proceeds will be available with
respect to this portion of Development District No. 1.
Subsection 7.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement
costs, acquisition costs and other costs outlined in the Estimated
Cost of Project (Subsection 7.7 above) will be financed through the
annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is
anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated
from Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 to pay for costs
outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program.
Subsection 7.10. Original Tax Capacity; Estimated
Captured Tax -Capacity. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 1 of the
Tax Increment Financing Act, the original tax capacity for Tax
Increment Financing District No. 6 is estimated to be $24,040 for
the year 1992 payable 1993, based on the tax capacity of all
taxable real property within Tax Increment Financing District No.
6, and assuming the market value of the east parcel to be $522,600
and that the west parcel will be owned by the City and considered
tax-exempt property. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 4,
of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the County Auditor of
Washington County (the "County Auditor") shall certify in each year
the amount by which the original tax capacity has increased or
decreased as a result in a change in tax-exempt property within Tax
Increment Financing District No. 6, reduction or enlargement of Tax
Increment Financing District No. 6 or changes in connection with
previously issued building permits. In any year in which the
current tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 6
declines below the original tax capacity, no tax capacity will be
captured and no tax increment will be payable to the City.
Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section
469.177, Subd. 2, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the estimated
captured tax capacity in Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 at
completion, 1994 payable 1995, will be approximately $127,760.
This estimated annual captured tax capacity value is determined in
the following manner:
7-3