The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007-11-14 CPC PacketI (SI at er .k .., THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Wednesday, November 14, 2007, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA 1 CALL TO ORDER 2 APPROVAL OF October 8, 2007 MINUTES 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS 301 Case No 07-48 A request for a variance for the construction of a porch located at 518 South Fourth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Colleen and Del Blocher, applicants 4 OTHER BUSINESS 4 01 Annual Bed and Breakfast Review CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET • STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651 430 8800 • WEBSITE www cl stillwater mn us j City of Stillwater Planning Coninussion October 8, 2007 Present Mike Dahlquist, Vice Chair, Suzanne Block, Dan Kalmon, Taylor Luke, David Peroceschi and Charles Wolden Staff present Planner Pogge and Community Development Director Turnblad Absent Dave Middleton and Wally Milbrandt Vice Chair Dahlquist called the meeting to order at 7 p in Approval of minutes Mr Wolden, seconded by Mr Peroceschi, moved approval of the minutes of Sept 10, 2007 Motion passed unanimously PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No 07 46 A request for a variance for location of a pool in the side yard at 512 Sixth St S in the RB, Two Family Residential District Tim Freeman, Folz, Freeman, Enckson Inc, representing Jennifer MacDonald Mr Pogge reviewed the request and staff findings He noted that staff did find a hardship due to the topography of the lot which creates an issue for the placement of a pool in the rear yard However, he said staff did not find in the affinnative that a variance is necessary for the preservation of property rights Mr Wolden asked whether the pool and pool equipment could be separated Mr Pogge responded that if the variance is approved, staff is recommending that a condition of approval be that the equipment is setback 3' from the property line Mr Wolden asked if the proposed pavers were indeed pervious material Mr Pogge said this is a new technology, and the City Engineer has reviewed and approved of the pavers Mr Kalmon asked if plans must meet any watershed distnct requirements for storm events Mr Pogge stated that the City Engineer, who works with the Middle St Croix Watershed, has reviewed plans and found plans to meet all requirements There was a question about the proposed private fence in the front of the pool Mr Pogge noted that the proposed fence meets setbacks — it will be placed behind the front of the house and therefore can be 6' high, as proposed 1VIr Freeman said he started talking with the City Engineer immediately regarding pervious surfaces Because the pool itself is considered impervious surface coverage, he said the plan is to remove all sidewalk and part of the driveway and replace the existing material with the pervious pavers He also spoke to the hardship of having no real rear yard for the placement of a pool, and suggested that the ability to have a pool is a substantial property right He also noted that the only lot close to where this proposed pool will be located has an existing pool that is closer to the street than the MacDonalds' pool will be Mr Freeman stated that while it is more convenient to have the equipment placed in the immediate proximity of the pool, he said the equipment could be moved if the City finds that to be necessary City of Stillwater Planning Commission October S, 2007 Mr Dahlquist opened the public hearing No comments were received, and the hearing was closed Mr Peroceschi, seconded by Mr Luke, moved approval as conditioned Mr Wolden said he did not like the equipment placed on the property line It was noted that one of the conditions of approval is that the equipment be placed a minimum of 3' from the property line Motion passed unanimously OTHER BUSINESS Discussion of new proposed location for St Croix Preparatory Academy — Mr Turnblad introduced the discussion He noted the new site is directly across the street and north of the previous site The new location includes two parcels with 14 gross acres, lie said Before final details are developed, he said the Academy would like to get general reactions from the Planning Commission Mr Turnblad pointed out this site is within the City and is currently zoned TR, rather than RA He noted that the only different between the TR and RA zoning is that schools are a permitted use in the RA zone, but not in the TR zone Mr Dahlquist asked why schools were left out of the TR zone Mr Turnblad said he thought that was an oversight, noting that the TR zone was created as part of the Liberty development, primarily to deal with issues such as garage setbacks and streetscapes Mr Turnblad suggested that the Planning Commission might want to consider either changing the ordinance or changing the zoning of the site Mr Turnblad noted that this is not a public hearing, but the Chair could take comments if he so desired Mr Dahlquist noted that this was not a public hearing He stated he would hear from St Croix Academy representatives and then would accept public comments for 15 minutes or so He noted that if the Academy proceeds with plans, a full public hearing will be held Representing St Croix Academy were architect Ed Kodet, director Jon Gutierrez and Carroll Johnson Mr Kodet briefly reviewed the site and building plans He stated the plans have incorporated public input received during discussions of the previous site He noted that a height variance will not be needed, as this site will accommodate a walkout design He said a proposed road has been relocated to the north of the site, and traffic will come in off White Pine Way He stated all bus queuing will be on site, and the parking lot will be buffered from residential properties He also stated courtyards and landscaping will be used to diminish the scale of the building from the street front Mr Kalmon asked if they had talked with the Brown's Creek Watershed District Mr Kodet said they are working on obtaining necessary approvals Mr Kodet pointed out that the City has hired an independent traffic consultant to do a study that will look at Millbrook development at full build -out and the school at full capacity Mr Kalmon asked if they had looked at future expansion Mr Kodet said the proposed building will be full build -out, except for an additional 50 parking spaces in the future Mr Dahlquist asked if they had been in contact with the Millbrook developers, Mr Kodet said they had been working with those folks, and positive reactions have been received On a question from Mr Wolden, Mr Kodet reviewed the provision of parking — 132 spaces in the main lot, 12 staff spaces and 52 proof -of -parking spaces for future development 2 City of Stillwater Planning Commission October 8, 2007 After Mr Kodet's presentation, Mr Dahlquist invited comments from the audience, asking that comments be kept to questions or specific concerns Erin Lisle, 1841 Heifort Court, stated major concerns center around traffic She stated 150 residents objected to the previous plan utilizing the Heifort property and a lot of objections are not alleviated by the new site She stated there are still no incentives for traffic to come down Highway 96 to White Pine Way, and it will be impossible to get out onto Neal Avenue due to increased traffic She said there is a concern that parking will spill over into the neighborhood during large events Jerry Daniels, 1860 Oak Glen Dnve, asked for equal time to prepare an official position He asked for copies of the official meetings minutes and traffic studies Mr Turnblad said he thought the traffic study might be completed later in the week of the meeting, and said he would make copies available at City Hall for public use Chuck Benson, 1950 Oak Glen Trail, stated there are too many unanswered questions He questioned whether moving the location across the street changes much, stating the issues remain the same — traffic concerns What has changed, he noted, is the addition of a delivery entrance off Neal between Oak Glen Trail and McKusick Road John Van Tassel, 13093 McKusick Road, questioned how buses would be touted, noting that County Road 15 is a "disaster" and Neal Avenue is narrow He suggested the site in question is impractical and doesn t have enough room Ruth Bruns, 8790 Neal Avenue, expressed a concern about the steep grade on Neal Avenue and a concern about how buses would be routed, suggesting that the dirt road (Neal Avenue) cannot accommodate that traffic Robert Villesvik, 1960 Oak Glen Trail, said if neighborhood meetings have been held, as mentioned by Mr Dahlquist, they were never notified After neighbor comments, representatives of St Croix Preparatory Academy were given a change to respond to questions/comments Mr Gutierrez addressed a comment made by Mr Benson regarding the Council's negative vote on the previous site He noted that the Council never voted on the previous plans, the Planning Commission's previous action was due to the need for annexation, and this site doesn't need to be annexed — it's already in the City, he noted Mr Gutierrez also stated there is definitely enough land to accommodate the schools, students and programming He also stated school representatives have talked with the Watershed District and have complied with the Watershed District's new regulations and increased the buffer zone another 25' Mr Gutierrez noted that the major concern continues to be traffic, and he said he thought the new, independent study would address those concerns Ms Johnson also pointed out i City of Stillwater Planning Coinnussion October 8, 2007 the Academy has not held any formal meetings with neighbors, they have had informal discussions with anybody who has asked questions Commission members were asked for their initial reactions/concerns Ms Block referred to Mr Kalmon's previous comments about concerns regarding bias in the traffic study done for the previous Academy site and how to allay that perception of bias Mr Turnblad said while he does not believe any professional would intentionally provide misleading information, he explained that the City hired an independent contractor to for a new traffic study to "remove any smell of bias " Mr Peroceschi said he thought the property should be rezoned RA, and said he thought it would help a lot if Neal Avenue were blacktopped for access off Highway 96 Mr Wolden said his primary concern continues to be traffic — how the traffic is handled and what triggers City traffic control measures Mr Kalmon said he thought it would be important to work closely with the DNR and Watershed District as there are a lot of protected areas in close proximity to the site, and said he agreed with the comments regarding traffic Mr Luke said he was concerned with traffic especially during the morning and afternoon school traffic times and traffic stacking on site Ms Block said she would be interested in seeing the amount of impervious surface coverage for the school versus 25 home sites, she also said she was anxious to bee the results of the traffic study Mr Dahlquist reiterated that the vast majority of concern centers on traffic, he suggested that the Academy address concerns regarding the service entrance and parking during large school events Mr Dahlquist also suggested that anything that can be done to reduce the massing of the building as viewed from Neal Avenue would be a plus Mr Turnblad reminded Commission members of a joint meeting with the City Council, HPC, Parks Board and Planning Commission scheduled for Nov 8 Mr Luke, seconded by Mr Kalmon, moved to adjourn at 8 30 p m Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 4 DATE APPLICANT REQUEST LOCATION j a ter 1 H E R 1 R f H P L A f E O F M I N N E b 0 1 A • Planning Commission November 7, 2007 Colleen and Del Blocher CASE NO V\07-48 A variance to allow a porch and steps to encroach into the required front yard setback 518 Fourth Street S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT SFLL - Single Family Small Lot ZONING RB - Two Family Residential PC DATE November 14, 2007 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director • PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner AA4 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting a variance to Sec 31-308 (b)1 of the City Code in order to install a porch and steps on the home The required front yard setback in the RB district is 20 feet The zoning code does allow some projections to go up to three feet in to a required setback 1 However, porches2 are not permitted to project into a required setback The front of the home, excluding the turret, is approximately 20 5 feet from the front property line The request is to extend a porch/front stoop 4'11" out from the front of the home with two steps that extend beyond the front stoop If the minimum required stair run of 10" is used the steps will add an additional 1'10" From the foundation to the end of the steps the total projection will be 6'9" or an encroachment into the required front yard setback of approximately 6'3" ' Sec 31 514 Subd 3 a — Awnings sills cornices, buttresses, eaves, landmgs and necessary steps and similar architectural features may project into required yard a distance of not more than three feet so long as the projection is not closer than three feet from the property line 2 Porch — A covered platform usually having a separate roof at an entrance to a dwelling or an open or enclosed gallery or room, which is not heated or cooled that is attached to the outside of a building 518 Fourth Street S Page 2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST A variance may be granted only when all of the following conditions are found • 1 A hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists Personal, family or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance The property at 518 Fourth Street South is a regularly shaped conforming single- family lot The hardship is created by the original placement of the home and was not created by an act of the owner This hardship is particular to this property 2 A variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights, and, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege not enjoyed by neighbors This property is zoned for a single-family home and is currently being used as a single-family home Without this variance the property owner will be able to continue to use the property as a single-family home Staff does not believe that approval of this variance is necessary to preserve a substantial property right which has been denied The homes both north and south of this home are setback at or behind this home If the applicant is perrrutted to build the plan as proposed the home will extend in front of other homes in the area This would create a special privilege that is not enjoyed by the neighboring properties 3 The authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the purpose and intent of this section or the public interest nor adversely affect the comprehensive plan The purpose of this code section is to provide a harmonious street appearance In this case the property owner is proposing to install a porch and steps that will extend beyond other homes in the block and beyond the required front yard setback By granting the variance the purpose and intent of the code is adverted The building code requires only a 3' landing at the front door with 10" step runs If the landing is shortened to 3' the total projection will be reduced from 6'9" to 4'10" The encroachment into the required front yard setback would also be reduced from approximately 6'3" to approximately 4'4" Staff believes that by reducing the front landing is more in spirit with the code and if the Commission desired to grant the variance it then should be minimized to the greatest extent possible C, 518 Fourth Street S Page 3 FINDINGS • 1 That the hardship is peculiar to the property and that it is not created by any act of the owner In this context, personal financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not factors involved in justifying a variance 2 That a variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district 3 If minimized, the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission has the following options 1 Deny the requested variance to encroach into the required 20-foot front yard setback [31-308 (b)11 since an affirmative finding on the required conditions for a variance could not be made by staff 2 Approve the requested variance to encroach into the required 20-foot front • yard setback [31-308 (b)11 If the Commission chooses to grant the variance the commission needs to make an affirmative finding on the required conditions for a variance Additionally, staff would suggest that the following conditions for approval a All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director b That the front landing be reduced to 3' and that the encroachment into the required front yard setback be no more than 4'10" 3 Continue the public hearing until the December 10, 2007 Planning Commission meeting The 60 day decision deadline for the request is December 18, 2007 RECOMMENDATION Since an affirmative finding could not be made for the three variance review criteria, staff recommends denial of the requested variance Attachments Applicant's Form and supplemental material 0 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No V o I Date Filed I/ L `' • Fee Paid _ `� Receipt No i ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with anyappl►cat►on All supporting mater►al (► e , photos, sketches etc ) submittedwith application becomes the propertyof the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting materialis required Ifapplication is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals there is a 10 day appeal period Once the 10 day appeal period has ended the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits p t • PROPERTY S4llr�IDENTIFICATI ��tiP J�d Sri t4 Address of Protect �% C� � As essof s Parcel No , Zoning District V�b-Description of Protect see Q'ffaC—Ar& (GEO Code) I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief to be true and correct / further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner_ Mailing Address 5/ ``yam+ e� City State Zip 7�� / PAJ S�-OZL Telephone No k9 3S/ — /'25,O Representative Mailing Add City State Zi Telephone No Signature C% "►L`IQ Signature (Signature is required) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION c� I Lot Size (dimensions) t O x �� Total Building floor area � G/ Zp C square feet Land Area Existing square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed square feet Principal _ r Paved Impervious Area square feet Accessory 1t f No of off street parking spaces H \mrnamara\[hPda\PI ANAPP FIRM June 9 2006 Variance Request Colleen and Del Blocher 518 South Fourth St Stillwater, MN 55082 Home (651)351-1250 Office (651) 275-1620 Our home located at 518 South Fourth Street, was built in 1877 The house is situated next to two commercial properties, Simonet Law Office and the Washington County Historic Courthouse Historically the house included a wrap around porch that no longer exists The purpose of our proposal requesting a variance is to build a simple awning like structure to provide for better protection to the foundation There is a wet condition in the basement that is eroding the foundation There is existing rot of the main supporting beams, particularly in the turret which has caused it to sink This needs correction Our plans are to rebuild the foundation, replace rotting beams and provide protection to the new foundation The property provides a physical hardship in that there is a minimal pitch between the foundation and the city boulevard and sidewalk The turret roofline does not adequately hang over the side of the house Extending an awning from the front steps around the turret would help to divert rainwater and moisture and provide for drainage away from the foundation wall This would help correct the wet condition The front stoop measures 51/2 feet from the foundation The proposed awning would extend 4 feet 8 inches from the foundation The posts supporting the awning would be 3 feet 8 inches out from the foundation and rest one foot back from the proposed roofline Our home is an historic property Our proposal will guarantee to preserve the life of this house which compliments the Historic Courthouse Our home is the only historic property left standing directly across from the Historic Courthouse on Fourth Street l+1 I 1 'I I1� '' / " I I p 1 I I�I ' It T {r{� "4 I ' /I j Y? I ; ! • II 1 Z , � / /t � 1 1 V � x II 1 • I If n d 6// i j i I cJ.4"!H JlA / , I Fl I 11 I I/ I �'I��1 f"3 � '� U � • IJr D I / I41r (II 1 / If I 1TC' � s/e f 46 38 1 t in I , t E° y 1 J ' ij Of I I I ` SU , .rJ � ` `,/� J e M feet , 100 1so�-H ' sT-. �I 1 I�;Ii1 � �•�`• , I Ow Al 47 I'� I y II t 1 1 a t � Ij III , / • P 1 I I 1 f t 1 I i t �'�}f' i t lwl IBC 11 ,rl I i I a In c I 9 w 1 6 c y 0 n i W couNly SECTION-TOWNSHIP41ANGE INDEX VICINITY MAP�,��,�WLII� LEGEND � 7 — T- 2003020 2103020 2203020 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DNR PROTECTED WATERS _ L —1 SURVEYAND LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION • • • • • • • • • • . DNR PROTECTED WETLAND * =LOCATION OF , 14949 62nd Street North, P.O. Box 6 — — DNR PROTECTED WATERCOURSE 129=2012803020127030201 THS MAP + NORTH �— —�- SBIlwaler, Minnesota 55082-0006 MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY (651) 430-6875 PARK BOUNDARY F StY1F ,omit surveyor&o.washington.mmus SCALE: 1 inch = 40 feet w.3203020 3303020020 I3403= ,* wwco.washington.mn.us L— —1 — L JI PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FORMAT (GEOCOOE) SECTNMI T0IYIS p PMYU WNM SPECIFIC MWBER WI R WJQEA OUIRTEA P,NCEL as too to xa to## (0001) •un wwoKursorPxn Enn ®EunFIUTox xu,eEn m THIS DRAWING IS THE RESULT OF A COMPILATION AND REPRODUCTION OF a LAND RECORDS AS THEY APPEAR IN VARIOUS WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICES. WASHINGTON COUNTY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INACCURACIES. PROPERTY LINES AS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES AND MAY NOT _ REPRESENT ACTUAL LOCATIONS R MAP LAST UPDATED: July 31, 2007 NO ADDITIONAL CHANGES HAVE BEEN REPORTED TO DATE 8 0 DATE OF CONTOURS: April, 2000 DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY: April, 2005 1 3 g (0004) (0053) \ i s 0 10 (0056) s Zpp 4 �5p 1 C �5p � 9 s o \ 12 �5 2 �15p (0077) cr 15p 1 0 15p 00 (0055) 4 WA T Ei (0 54) 9 5 s �5p Cn � \ �5p (0076) (0108) y (0079) / 6 /p 9p 7 150 6 (0060) \ \ so / \ \ `Q (0059) o 1 o G (0061) G 45 s 19 a 007) (0006) \ 0058 oe I 1 _ I 18 (oos2) TA / J1 \1A y � � f� � 165 } I " \ 15p o (0057) o 0 \ 17 4 k (0063) S-��EE �55 Jr �0081) ` (0065) \ o (0014) (008) , N �' PPr�Nv� / \Z so 2� �" p �s \ o \J► j (0069) �� \ (0066) (ooso) o /24 i dSiri tmCOLINTY THIS sEcrwWTOVMSRiP�wcE INDEX wcmm YAP SECTION VICINITY MAP LAND DRECORDS AS THEY APPEAR IN VARIOUS WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICES E PUBLIC WcoiiORKS D LEGEND Fi0� 2f03020 P2o3o U Fri PROPSarrmamcrATIONW mERwnwTPEOCODE) WASHINGTON COUNTY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INACCURACIES N �µ + PROPERTY LINES AS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES AND MAY NOT DNR PROTECTED WATERS _ "I" I �T4N� ,., w aria � REPRESENT ACTUAL LOCATIONS SURVEY AND LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION DNR PROTECTED WETLAND * LOCATION OF L 8## so 1490962rdS"NAbrM PO Barb — — DNR PROTECTED WATERCOURSE I2903020I2803020I2103020I THS MAP T MAP LAST UPDATED Juy31 2007 W SDP&21v iawsata 55082-0006 �; ms� MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY NORTH ---T _ T— L (ppp�� VE mM.A�vaoren (651)430�6875 - PARK BOUNDARY F I I � Sim � � NO ADDITIONAL CHANGES HA VE BEEN REPORTED TO DA TE awreyo@w waMhVton mn.La SCALE 1 Rxh - 80 feet 3303020I3103n at TS rgwmnus DATEOFCONTOURS W 2000 DATEOFPHOTOGRAPHY W 2005 a $ 300 16 S ILL-WAITR 15 5p 12 (0038) \ y (0039) 11 54 p40) �� o (0037� \ 2 (00?6) � Q o 15p \ (00 7) o � (� 7 \ 79- so 15p J WSW off i I s a P ♦'cb p 1 1 p 1 � I t 1 i I � t I I i j � � t � i tj L- } i t r ' Kf y� or I y IL It -�i-air►= - --- r j� is= �rpewe�wrw Ys a �nr.ue� r�m t r' l a ter 'zo. " • IHE Bi R f H VLA rF OF MINN E S OIA • 0 Planning Commission DATE November 8, 2007 ITEM Annual Bed and Breakfast Report to the Planning Commission PC DATE November 12, 2007 REVIEWERS Community Dev Director PREPARED BY Michel Pogge, City Planner M DISCUSSION As part of the bed and breakfast Ordinance, each establishment is to be reviewed annually by the Community Development Director and a written report is to be made to the Planning Commission and City Council in November of each year Staff conducted a full review of each bed and breakfast in the fall of 2006 This year staff conducted self -reviews completed by the owners of each bed and breakfast to ensure that they are still in compliance From these self -reviews, staff has determined that each of the bed and breakfast remains in compliance with their respective conditions There have been no changes to the Bed and Breakfast's in the community since last year There are currently seven active B&B's which is the same as last year Additionally, Staff did not receive any complaints this year related to any of the bed and breakfasts in the community STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission receive and file the attached bed and breakfast annual report and take no further action Annual Report of Active B&B Is Name Owner Rooms Special Events Address Date Owned Current SUP Case # Ann Bean Mansion Jeremy and Erin Drews 5 guest rooms A maximum of six (6) events 319 West Pine Street 3/15/2004 (large functions defined asbusiness meetings bus tours 2004 11 CPC bridal and wedding showers anniversaries weddings and wedding receptions and church functions) over twenty (20) persons allowed per month Aurora Staples Inn Cathy and Jerry Helmberger 5 guest rooms (4 in A maximum of six (6) events 303 North Fourth Street 7/1/2002 main house and 1 in (large functions defined as carnage house) business meetings bus tours 2003 23 CPC bridal and wedding showers anniversaries weddings and wedding receptions and church functions) over twenty (20) persons allowed per month James Mulvey Inn Cynthia Hannig That a maximum of five No 622 Churchill Street West 11/13/2006 bedrooms at the 622 Churchill St West 200656 property at any one time James Mulvey Inn Jill and Truett Lawson 2 guest rooms in the No • 807 Harriet St So 12/9/1991 carnage house 200565 Lady Goodwood Bed and Br Ron Hannig 3 guest rooms A maximum of six (6) events 704 South First Street 4/7/2003 (large functions defined asbusiness meetings bus tours 2003 33 CPC bridal and wedding showers anniversaries weddings and wedding receptions and church functions) over twenty (20) persons allowed per month Rrvertown Inn Jeff and Julie Anderson 9 guest rooms (7 in the Two special events a month with 306 West Olive Street 9/23/1999 main home and 2 in the a limit of 18 people staying at the carnage home) Inn and 18 other people totaling 2005 69 CPC 38 people per event The Elephant Walk Rita Graybill Four guest rooms No p 801 West Pine Street 7/12/1992 2005 31 CPC William Sauntry Mansion Thomas and Sandra Lynum 6 guest rooms A maximum of six (6) events 626 North Fourth Street 10/21/1999 (large functions defined asbusiness meetings bus tours 1999 43 CPC bridal and wedding showers anniversaries weddings and wedding receptions and church functions) over twenty (20) persons allowed per month isThursday, November 08, 2007 Page I of 1 /*l I Ater THE BIRTHPLACE OF M I N N E S 0 1 A Memo Community Development Department To: Planning Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Thursday, November 08, 2007 Re: 2008 Meeting Dates Message: Commissioners - The following are the meeting dates for 2008. If there is a conflict please let me know so we can make a change before the City publishes the dates. Thank you, Mike Monday, January 14, 2008 Monday, February 11, 2008 Monday, March 10, 2008 Monday, April 14, 2008 Monday, May 12, 2008 Monday, June 9, 2008 Monday, July 14, 2008 Monday, August 11, 2008 Wednesday, September 10, 2008 Monday, October 13, 2008 Monday, November 10, 2008 Monday, December 8, 2008 From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Sji Iwa ter THE BIRTHPLACE OF M I N N E S 0 1 A Community Development Department To: Planning Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Thursday, November 08, 2007 Re: 2008 Meeting Dates Message: Commissioners - The following are the meeting dates for 2008. If there is a conflict please let me know so we can make a change before the City publishes the dates. Thank you, Mike Monday, January 14, 2008 Monday, February 11, 2008 Monday, March 10, 2008 Monday, April 14, 2008 Monday, May 12, 2008 Monday, June 9, 2008 Monday, July 14, 2008 Monday, August 11, 2008 Wednesday, September 10, 2008 ' Monday, October 13, 2008 Monday, November 10, 2008 Monday, December 8, 2008 From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us