Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-12-12 CPC Packetiliwater THE G � I T I �TbLELIW��SII�T A PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday December 12 2005 at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA 1 Case No CCN/05-50 A Certificate of Compliance and a variance to the rear yard setback (75 feet requned 35 feet and 67 feet proposed) for a 19 lot office condominiums development on a 5 14 acres of land located at 1749 South Greeley in the BP -I Business Park Industrial District Royal Oaks Realty and Ogren Properties applicants 2 Case No SUB/05-45 Preliminary plat approval of a 20 lot subdivision with a variance to the rear yard setback (35 feet proposed 75 feet required) on 5 14 acres of land located at 1749 South Greeley in the BP -I Business Park lndustnal District Royal Oaks Realty and Ogren Properties applicants 3 Case No SUB/05-70 A minor subdivision of Lots 35-38 Block 7 Carli and Schulenberg s Addition located at 1221 North Broadway in the RB Two Family Residential District George I Middleton, applicant 4 Case No SV/05-71 A street vacation of a portion of unimproved Holcombe Street abutting Lot 5 Blk 9 Thomas Parker and Mower s Second Addition James and Diane Kleinke and Ande and Muriel Hassis applicants 5 Case No SUB/05-72 A minor subdivision of Lot 3 Block 1 Joseph Wolf Brewery Addition into one lot of 1 200 square feet located at 402 South Main Street in the CBD Central Business District Steve Bremer 402 main Street LLC applicant 6 Case No CPA/05-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use designation of 8 0 acres of land Liberty West from Rural Residential to Cottage Residential located at 7135 - 7143 Manning Avenue Croix Capital Group applicant 7 Case No ZAM/05-01 Zoning Amendment changing the zoning designation from Agricultural Preservation AP to Cottage Residential CR of 8 0 acres of land Liberty West' at 7135 - 7143 Manning Avenue Croix Capital Group applicant 8 Case No PUD/05-73 Planned Unit Development for a 20 lot development on 8 0 acres of land located at 7135 - 7143 Manning Avenue in the Cottage Residential CR, District Croix Capital Group applicant 9 Case No SUB/05-75 Preliminary plat approval for a 21 lot subdivision on 8 0 acres of land in the Cottage Residential District located at 7135-7143 Manning Avenue Croix Capital Group applicant 10 Case No ANN/05-01 Annexation of 8 0 acres of land zoned Cottage Residential into the City of Stillwater Liberty West located at 7135-7143 Manning Avenue Croix Capital Group applicant 11 Case No SUP/05-74 A special use permit for auto sales business located at 1778 Greeley Street in the BP-C Business Park Commercial District Gary Starns applicant Other Items Downtown Height Study Neighborhood Conservation Program and upcoming meeting December 14 2005 CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Present Chairperson Robert Gag, Gregg Carlsen, Mike Dahlquist, Dave Middleton, David Peroceschi, Paul Teske and Jerry Turnquist Mr Gag introduced Suzanne Block, a new member Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent David Junker Mr Gag called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m Approval of minutes It was moved and seconded to approve the minutes of October 10, 2005 Minutes were approved unanimously Case No V/05-64 A variance to the Duplex Residential Zoning Regulations for a commercial use, therapeutic healing retail sales home business located at 104 North Owens Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Lisa Ann Clark, applicant Ms Clark was present She has owned the property on the corner of Owens Street since 2002 She said she initially couldn't tell what the property was built to be but finally figured out it was a duplex Ms Clark added that it was not safe structurally when she bought it There is an upstairs apartment Ms Clark is trying to figure out what to do with the downstairs since the lower area doesn't have plumbing other than a bathroom —no kitchen plumbing or appliances She's going to school for therapeutic horticulture at the Arboretum Part of her training is learning to make natural healing balms Ms Clark would like to sell therapeutic healing items at the duplex Ms Clark anticipated that most of her business would be from referrals Mr Turnquist wondered what Ms Clark was going to do with the apartment She stated she was planning to keep it Ms Clark said a family member would live upstairs Her business hours would be very flexible —she is willing to cooperate with the community Ms Clark doesn't anticipate parking issues because she doesn't believe there will be large groups of customers corning at the same time Mr Peroceschi asked if the variance stayed with the owner or the property Mr Russell advised that the variance stayed with the property Mr Gag invited the public to approach the podium Ted Gillen, 1011 W Myrtle, stated he lives across the street from the property in question He does not want to see commercial use of this building Right now there is a tremendous problem with traffic and parking because of the nearby store If the store property is sold and the owner decides not to have a store, it reverts back to residential use Mr Gillen doesn't feel the area warrants adding more commercial structures He noted the proposed use could be located elsewhere He knew the pnor owners and acknowledged part of the house was not in good condition There were facilities in the lower level for a kitchen Mr Gillen didn't City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 2 have a problem with the apartment However, he didn't think there was a second egress for the upstairs He objects to the commercial use due to the probability of (1) increased traffic and (2) the affect on adjacent property values Al Ruttger stated he lives across the street from Ms Clark s property He agrees with Mr Gillen's concerns and noted there is a lot of traffic There was no further comment from the public Mr Peroceschi stated that despite the ments, it's clear that the proposed use of the prop- erty is a use variance The code is clear that a use vanance is not allowed The Commis- sion would have to deny the request Mr Peroceschi moved to deny it The motion was seconded by Mr Turnquist Mr Teske commented that it was a nice business plan However, in the proposed area, it doesn't seem to be fair for the neighbors to have to deal with additional traffic The motion to deny was passed unanimously Case No SUB/05-65 A subdivision of Lot 3, Block 15 Carli and Schulenberg's Addition (15,000 square feet) into two lots of 7,500 square feet each located at 324 Wilkins Street East in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Scott Junker, applicant Mr Junker was in attendance The property is on the north hill There was a fire last year The City cleaned up the site and Mr Junker purchased it He would like to con- struct two homes, instead of one The house to the west (where water and sewer cur- rently is) would be about 2000 square feet, the house to the east 1400-1500 square feet Mr Junker would like to have both dnveways come off of Broadway The homes are similar to the one he built on Poplar by the golf course They would be similar to one another with two stories, porches and two -car garages There currently is a two -car ga- rage on the site that will be removed The public was invited to comment Brian McMann, 1107 North First Street, stated his backyard is contiguous to the property He moved to the north hill because he didn't want to live in a new development area The houses in the area are 100-150 years old He's afraid that the message will be sent that no matter where someone may live, if there's a fire, two, three or more houses could be crammed onto a piece of property and the overall effect would destabilize the area There being no further comments from the audience, it was brought back to the Commis- sion Mr Middleton commented that he was glad to hear there are no proposed variances He felt there was nothing that would stop the development as it meets the minimum lot size He moved to approve the application Motion was seconded by Mr Peroceschi Mr City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 3 Teske remarked that as he's gone through the neighborhood, he noticed a definite pattern of the houses on the corner lots He was hesitant to change the character of the neighbor- hood Although skeptical, he acknowledged there was a benefit of having two homes in- stead of one on the property Ms Block asked if either home was going to be for the ap- plicant s personal use Mr McMann said no Mr Gag noted that the application was a clear thought out plan with no variances Mr Peroceschi stated he had driven around the neighborhood and considered its charac- ter Some of the homes are on very small lots He still has some of the same concerns as Mr Teske Mr Middleton wondered if the assessment had been paid Mr McMann re- plied that was his understanding Condition #2 is a certificate of survey Mr McMann wasn't aware of it He wondered why he would need one when the property is already platted There being no further discussion, a vote was taken The application passed unani- mously Case No V/05-66 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 23 feet re- quested) for the expansion of a garage located at 928 South Greeley Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District Dennis Peters, applicant Mr Peters was present He wants to widen the garage by 6' He would not be building upward There is no other way to provide a two -car garage on the property which is for sale A two -car garage is a necessity today Most of the houses in the area have two -car garages Currently, the site has a 1-1/2 stall garage which was built in the early 1950's, not 1995 Mr Peters presented a series of photos showing current and proposed sizes He introduced Julie, a photographer from Woodbury, who explained each of the pictures Mr Russell acknowledged that the onginal garage does not meet the setback require- ments The proposed addition also does not meet the setback requirement Mr Gag invited the audience to speak Jim Qualey, 1014 South Greeley Street, stated there is a safety issue if the addition is added The visual at Greeley and Churchill is poor because of a large garage in the area Utility and telephone poles as well as vehicles line along the street The house is empty and for sale Mr Qualey didn't feel the vanance was good for the neighborhood as the lot (50') is too small for the size of proposed garage There being no further comments from the audience, it was brought back to the Commis- sion Mr Peroceschi asked where applicant parked his car Mr Peters rephed he parks in the garage —a vehicle is parked on the driveway would be on the sidewalk Mr Gag City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 4 commented that the garage seems too big for the size of the property Mr Turnquist agreed —it's too big now without the addition Mr Turnquist moved to deny the applica- tion, the motion was seconded and passed unanimously Case No V/05-67 A variance to the rear and side yard setbacks (5 feet required, 3 5 and 2 4 feet requested) for the construction of a garage located at 1006 West Pine Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Brian Roeller, applicant Mr Roeller was present He wants to rebuild the garage He is having problems finding a contractor to take the exiting garage down because it may fall on one of the neighboring garages Mr Gag invited comments from the audience There being none, Mr Dahlquist moved and Mr Peroceschi seconded to approve the application Mr Roeller agreed to the con- ditions The motion passed unanimously Case No V/05-68 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet re- quested) for the construction of a porch located at 315 West Olive Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Greg Stokes, applicant Mr Stokes was in attendance He owns a lovely Victonan home and wants to reconstruct the front porch —making it a wraparound He had a picture from the library of a similar porch The porch that was on the home was failing so he took it down Mr Gag invited public comment Judy Lacy stated she lives across the street She thought it was great that Mr Roeller was restoring the porch Paul Lacy remarked that Mr Stokes has done a lot of good work on the house Jeff Johnson, 309 South Fifth Street also agreed that Mr Stokes has done a great job in restoring the house He approved of adding the porch Mr Teske moved to approve the application, motion was seconded and passed unani- mously Case No SUP/05-69 A modification to a special use permit for the Rivertown Inn Bed and Breakfast for a 270 square foot kitchen addition located at 306 West Olive Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distract Mark Balay, representing Jeff and Julie Anderson, applicant Mr Balay, representing the applicants Jeff and Julie Anderson, was present He reported that the Heritage Preservation Commission approved the plan as historically accurate Mr Balay showed some floor plans Expansion is to the west Neither addition goes be- yond the onginal "footprint" of the building All of the addition is being placed on ex- City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 5 fisting concrete The rear entrance will be improved The east driveway is currently be- ing reconstructed The inn was closed November 7 The owners hope to have the kitchen addition completed in the next four months Mr Peroceschi asked Mr Balay to address the noise and venting Mr Balay stated a new, smaller hood will be installed An air conditioning coil will run like a residential coil (i e , quiet) Mr Balay noted the expansion would not increase the size of the parties that can be held at the inn as no rooms are being added Mr Teske inquired why there was a need for a larger kitchen Mr Balay said the existing kitchen is probably smaller than that in most homes The owners are trying to correct some architectural problems Mr Gag invited public comment He suggested that Mr Balay address all the questions at the end Judy Lacy, 318 W Olive, stated she lives next door to the inn She asked where the parking spaces were on the map She commented that she has gone through the appeal process for noise problems She wanted assurance that the vents, mechanicals, etc would be all new She also did not want anything on the south or west side of the B and B Paul Lacy pointed out the trash container area and parking spaces on the floor plan, nothing there is no provision for trash He said the reason the kitchen is small is because part of it was "lopped off' to make other rooms If the plan is approved, he would like a fourth condition that vents, fans, etc shall be located on the north or east side of the house He would not want mechanicals put on the roof Kathy Ertle, 118 South Fifth Street, stated that people should be able to remodel houses and kitchens She remarked that the property has become magnificent However, she did question the size of the addition, especially for a B and B and had concerns regarding the parking Over the years she has attended many Planning Commission meetings and the definition of this B and B has changed over the years There is no permanent resident There are evening dinners She and her husband have supported most of the changes but question what's going to happen in the future, especially if the current owners sell it They fear it may become a hotel or restaurant At some point, she would like the Plan- ning Commission to ask for a five-year plan from the B and B Over the years numerous variances have been granted to the B and B and that unfortunately has pitted neighbor against neighbor Ms Ertle noted there has been major construction in the neighborhood for the past three years due to work on the B and B and other homes in the area She also asked if the Planning Commission ever got any reports on the activities at the B and B She thought this was supposed to occur City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 6 The discussion was brought back to the Commission Mr Balay confirmed with the ma- son that the parking space did not exist previously in that location He also didn't think the City believes it's a parking space The trash has been brought inside The structure does not move closer to the property line Regard mechanical equipment and noise —the current plans address the Lacy's concerns The B and B ordinance has provision for an annual inspection which is occumng Mr Balay's understanding was that if the current owners sell the property, the new owners would have to get a permit to operate it as a B and B Mr Russell stated that was correct The inn is currently shut down There is a dumpster behind the house and there is a pod in the street He agreed that there has been a lot of construction in the neighborhood Mr Gag asked Mr Russell if the quarterly summary of reports had been done (#15 under Conditions of Approval) Mr Russell stated he didn't think so Mr Gag noted there seems to be a pattern with B and B's that they continue to grow Can the City ask for a five-year plan? Mr Russell didn't know if the City could require that It could provide information for the neighbors Mr Russell said it could be made a condition of approval Ms Block expressed surpnse that the owners don't live at the B and B Mr Teske said a B and B must have an on -site manager Mr Russell said this particular B and B has more bedrooms than what the B and B ordinance allows This is not a vanance but an expan- sion of the use permit Mr Middleton noted that the biggest concern the furnace location (if it will be on the roof) Mr Balay said it would have to be on the roof or in the basement Mr Middleton was concerned about the noise in a residential neighborhood if the furnace is outside Mr Balay said it could be put in the basement although it would be a little more difficult That could be made a Condition of Approval Mr Middleton would like to see vents and fans on the east side of the structure Mr Turnquist concurred that the furnace should be inside Mr Teske stated he didn't see the need for expansion He noted the B and B has been able to accommodate some pretty extensive parties in the current set up Mr Teske commented about the controversy and debate He stated that there constantly is a dump- ster on the street although it's not always for the B and B He didn't feel a compelling argument had been made for the expansion Mr Peroceschi wondered what the purpose of the B and B ordinance was Is the pro- posed plan necessary? Has there been any discussion of the purpose of the B and B ordi- nance by the Historic Preservation Committee? Jeff Johnson of the HPC said that they look at whether the addition or change reflects the character of the house —not the use They did not hear anything about the furnace being on the roof City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 7 Mr Gag admitted that the building is now a magnificent building He felt the applicants had, in the past, made a number of promises He acknowledged that the proposed addi- tion will probably look very nice However, Mr Gag felt the Planning Commission also was supposed to look out for the neighborhood's interests He would feel more comfort- able having a five-year plan Mr Gag acknowledged that B and B's do some great things, such as maintaining large homes that otherwise might fall into disrepair He was struggling with a decision but said it would be hard for him to approve the proposal Mr Carlsen noted he lives close to the B and B and understands neighbors' concerns He has never noticed any noise or parking problems and said he would probably vote to ap- prove Mr Peroceschi didn't see anything wrong with the proposal since the owners are not adding rooms for more guests —they just want to expand the kitchen to provide better service for the guests Ms Block wondered what would happen if the property revered to residential at some point Mr Balay acknowledged that was a possibility —the Lowell Street Inn was con- verted back to a single family residence and there was some construction involved However, he doubted the Rivertown B and B would revert to a single family home Mr Balay said that the county has grandfathered several things in for the kitchen If the owners gutted the kitchen, they would not be able to comply with all the county require- ments because there would not be room Mr Middleton moved to approve the application with the three conditions and adding a fourth that the furnace was not to be on the extenor and any vents would not protrude out the west and south sides of the home Mr Russell added that no parking space shall be lost and trash shall be in an enclosed area Mr Turnquist seconded the motion The mo- tion passed 5-2 Other Items Washington County presentation on Manning Avenue improvements Mr Russell stated that when the Comprehensive Plan Amendment was done in 1996, widening of Manning was anticipated A limiting restraint has been resources Phase growth will start in the next year or so The County will talk tonight about what's "on the boards " Joe Laux, Transportation Manager for the County, stated that Manning Avenue was built in 1961 Initial traffic was 350 vehicles/day and has now grown to 15,000 There are large delays every day He said there are problems making left turns and the pavement is City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 8 getting bad The County has proposed a four -lane divided highway There will be a trail on the east side and ditches on the west The County has sponsored two well attended open houses One of the main concerns of neighbors has been traffic noise and proximity to homes Options for mitigation such as berms would be intrusive into residential back yards There's a bike trail that doesn't meet standards If berms are built, all the trees between the homes and road will be removed There is no easy solution One possibility is to nar- row medians and turn lanes Others include (1) keeping the existing trail where it is, (2) moving the trail, or (3) moving the trail and adding a berm If a retaining wall is built, fewer trees would need to be removed The County is open to suggestions from the public Nothing is pending immediately The County applied for federal funding for 2007 which should cover 70% of the project The County and cities of Grant and Stillwater would also contribute The project will go from Highway 36 to 12 Mr Turnquist wondered why the trail is on the east side Mr Laux responded there is more use on the east side Mr Gag asked if the audience had any questions or thoughts Art Baumeister stated that the back of his house faces Manning and noted there's a blind hill He wondered how far down the road would be sunk Ms Cullen said that hasn't been considered yet The lower the road , the more significant impact there would be on Baumeister's property Mr Laux advised that the traffic study has not been completed Ms Cullen said that 62nd and Liberty does not have enough traffic nght now to warrant traffic lights Ms Block asked if it would be possible to repaint some of the streets Mr Laux said that has been done —there is a bypass lane An audience member asked what the next step was for the process —is there a way to meet with all the Liberty people? There have been separate meetings Mr Laux said there are different options for different neighborhoods The County has tried to separate things by similar concerns Mr Laux said he could hold a large meeting for everyone Mr Gag thanked the staff from Washington County for attending City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 14, 2005 Page 9 It was moved by Mr Turnquist to adjourn the meeting Motion seconded and passed unanimously Meeting adjourned at 9 35 p m Respectfully submitted, Barbara J McDonald Recording Secretary /bjm PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO CC/V/05-50 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 1749 South Greeley Street Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Industrial Zoning District BP -I Applicants Name Royal Oaks Realty Project Description Request for certificate of compliance (use) with a variance to rear yard setback (75 ft required, 35 feet to 67 feet proposed) for 19 lot office condominiums development on a 5 14 acres site Discussion This item was before the Planning Commission on August 8, 2005 At that meeting, a variance to the tree ordinance was denied and the preliminary plat continued until the required tree survey was prepared Other planning issues discussed at the August 8th meeting were drainage/impervious surface requirements, rear setback and landscape plan improvements In response to the concerns expressed at the August 8th meeting, the applicant has prepared a tree survey (enclosed) reduced the project size by three office sites and rearranged the site plan to preserve stands of Oak and Spruce trees The lot coverage requirement is met by the revised site plan The tree survey is shown on Page 2 of the application package Page C-2 is the preliminary site plan and maps L-1 to L-3 are the landscape plans The landscape plan shows existing trees along Greeley Street (Maples), the front south property boundary (Spruce) and rear south property boundary (Oak) being preserved Since the August 8th meeting, the following changes have been made 1 Three office condo's have been eliminated, 2 The site grading has been changed to eliminate several retaining walls, 3 Trees have been saved along the rear and south boarder of the site, and 4 The rear building has been moved further to the west (Greeley Street) to increase setback Currently, the proposal shows a rear setback of 67 feet to 35 feet It should be noted that beyond the rear property boundary is a deeded 180 foot open space wooded natural areas This in effect buffers the office project from the residences to the east The site plan shows 196 parking spaces for the 57,079 square foot office building per code The northeast building component, Lots 1-6, have a minimum 35 foot setback If the setback was widened to 60 feet, a clump of Oak trees could be preserved and site drainage to the rear better controlled (see memo from Engineering Department) The landscape plan shows existing trees along Greeley Street preserved with significant building foundation and parking island landscaping A nicely landscaped picnic area is shown between Buildings 16 and 17 The office use is a permitted use in the Business Park Industrial District No specific office uses are proposed at this time but depending on use may required additional review Recommendation Approval with conditions Findings for Variance 1 The use is consistent with the BP -I zoning district regulations 2 Because of the site conditions and adjacent woodland natural area separation and buffering the site from residential area to the east the purpose of the 75 foot setback is met (the separation between office building and residence is over 200 feet, 75 feet required) Conditions of Approval 1 The setback for the building component Units 1-6, shall be 60 feet minimum to accommodate runoff from the rear of the building and protect a stand of Oak trees 2 The landscape plan shall be planted before building occupancy 3 Any building signage shall require a sign permit 4 Before project grading, the existing trees that are scheduled to be preserved shall be protected by fencing 5 A preconstruction conference shall be held to review tree protection and erosion control measures before grading begins Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 5-0 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * X Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action am attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any apphcation All supporting matenal (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with apphcation becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project III 11 6RRr--L1 '7T T" Assessors Parcel No 3) 430-7L'3Z-DOo1{ 1 DOD $' (GEO Code) Zoning District P 1 Description of Project bk. - 1` 11[1(9 1 FF1t i3U uott-fC, Attu ZI IJ rvv TaWN o FFcc-e.S I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner 06RM Pf'ERJi %5 &1c )P Mailing Address Po Box I'5 City - State - Zip 611 LL--W►f R 9So0 Z Lot Size (dimensions) (vl ? x iI D (trregykr shisoel Land Area S 1 g At. /1 Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal .SCE_ PLI41-15 Accessory Representative I - ` ( 1-4 , Royft.origiAtihui Mailing Address 10170 'lam) R E , t)c7g f 50 City - State - Zip - iti'kEY1 E.14 t " I t4 5 5/ 2_62 Telephone No 10 i - 71 y 01 13 Telephone No 695 - 7 �� 3- SSA p, Slgnatu = i! ��� Signature /t— (Signature is '.uired) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area (711 10 square feet Existing j C O square feet Proposed Co3 (oZD square feet Paved Impervious Atea JIIo,3OS square feet No of off-street parking spaces -2.7-ei Royal Oaks Drainage on the backside of the buildings should be addressed more closely The concern the Engineenng Department has is that the runoff from the buildings has the potential to washout or erode the steep slope and quality trees behind the buildings This is the case in the Highlands Development where backyard runoff has caused a severe erosion problem down to Lily Lake ( see attached pictures ) and the City is looking at spending $100,000 + to correct the problem ° \ r\\11 5/fk7w1,6 y v / y/�" ,f / / �? \\ 7201 , �\t. r�vvA— / / i - 71 \\ - , / ' —10 � _— Qj R_IW R_0W R19W ` 0310 O \'\* , ,,1 �C`� 9/ `IY T3 N T3 N \\� 1 ems- i \ ii 1 _ = ILT,Q'uLf�`� ----- — STREE T31N T31N — -- , / — — --- — it till1THIME HIRE \\ \\ 1 / /I\..: - TJOV 'l \, ,\ / \\\ ('fj/ �� T29N . T29N / 1 �� / — } N , t / TBN w li PAN , \8 od_-- "� / / — 1 ! / �\'' �- \� T27N 1 T'�7N / I - \ ;yam...I.:,_ '' R22W R_IW R20W _,, Lill \ I— �C , �.\\ i 920, \\ \ , I-- —_ \ 1041 Vicinity Map �\ \ __ �/ r /j%-*`-A'' N\\N �- �1 - --r vA �_ \� n� ^ \\ \ \ �'\\ \ \ , / i �`•-� 11'1 \\\\\ k'rY� \\ , N\`\\ : it 9 �� ` ` ��\ \\\ \\��, l \ �,! {al it 1 _ , _ �_ 7 _ �`_ _Ir -__- y Fri i t� _ ;Yt ��\�� 27 ,,Iii lit rr ~ \�'` : t 4 , �` r'� 1 \' ~�4�� �%,\ / i 1372 \ v - O / 0 \\ r \ 0 280 f I ER��' �'_ �'i 1'�`,\ , \, _� Scale In Feet .�^1TRO .—/ lam' \ y ) �-rllei'i)+gi _ ,�t y j 0, � \ ^ \ _� �✓�� �' i0' •1 1 y� lry }���„iII�(�, X 1 1 r�� �,,,,,--j. ," 1_402 . = 4 1 ~q \ ,,\\kZ \ 1 6 a i= \--�� � 4i �� ,,4 \\\ - �M ` 1 I --- ' I �1 N�\ ��iv� — ,1,', 7 „--_,--_,_1 -' 1 k\- f�ia/7 -_ ,`-�_' f 40'i , ,1, ,-..I �y ' _\ 1Tt -_ 1 I \' y 1 h i,, i" l L a 1 1451 1 1 w -a\� ; • L — = �,'E �' MI�'1504 ' 1 `I ..,. . f 0' J / ` I\j li( — - r' fJ /-%ll'��-7-- - , �.�. :. y _ ` �\ \ �\ n°. .way w a rae• - aL 4 ' x. r :J—'—r , t ORLE a$=S�TKE T— _ --- \\t, .or --1- ' .a all. -May // rr ,s •�� I`� , - 60'� Aww\v b Location Map/-/j ,' v,v r •- I 1 ' ll '!� I my N — \ \\ o\ �o/ i ` \ \ . ma Wash —C.ay Suns. Off 1,a..1 306575 k\ ` _, IP- 5 i 6�19I \ , \V. Ma ook#N5 ue Stove. �}23- j 17b r eye S $ii� S 1 I -I- -re/Ce 1 NS-F,..( I .G.O to d # n 1 Yl, fA 4v P o „A- w1'ILI Sew, e5 0� S-0'"" r " ,, 5, 14-‘e.i(1- TN 5 +a 1(c...4 k o" CETI1CTE CP LvEbr FOR: ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 WEST COUNTY ROAD E SUITE 150 SHOREvIEW, MN 55126 TELE: (651) 453-5515 CURVE CREST BLVD. 7 8 4- 33 J- 0o f' ed 1 ET SPIRE OF: STILLWATER TOWN OFFICE SITE SITE ADDRESS: ri4gCREELEYST.S STILLWATER, MN 55052 • BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY AND PARKING I -FOUNO .Xd4 33 1 E. G. RUD 4 SONS, INC. Land Surveyors 9180 LEXINGTON AVENUE NE. CIRCLE PINES, MN. 55014-3625 Tel. 163-186-555e. Fax '163-TI86-1aG '1 PROPERTY OWNER: OGREN PROPERTIES GROUP P.O. BOX 15 STILLWATER, MN 55052 'Fr ND 1/ „I; ?crtY9 y� •dYy �' ... .4f FpND I.P. .�1> "S ��"• as, r3ns - 6'dct',dr�ye11.�,r� e FOUND_1/2" I.P. �DESCRIPTIOfVS MOWED CREAN,, .. AP'ONN COMMON NNE 690.89 (665 DEEO)j f--UNE PARALLEL iII1Ni THEsou*UNE Cr THE NW 1/4 OF; TNEi SW T/4 OF SEC. 33 • T S C BITUMINOUS PAYING /7 (672.9 DEED) ,-CORNER OF BUILDING N89 47'54"E ON LOT LINE —'-- SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW I/4 OF SECTION 33. T. 30, R. 20 t/ FpIND 1y2. 1 FOUND 7/2 L'P. NOTE: Greely Street location and alignment token from survey by Joel T. Anez lost doted 10-14-88 The distances of 455.98 and 302.7 feet in the property description are measured perpendicular to the South line of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 33. Bench Mark: MnDOT Brass Disk stomped "OSGOOD 1974" at Southeast Quadrant of Trunk Hwy No. 36 and Osgood Ave. N. Elev. = 903.15(NAVD 1988) 1 hereby certify that this survey, pion or report wos prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. E. RUD Date: 9-/9-BooS License No. 47578 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Certificate of Title No. 27872, Register of Titles Office, Washington County, Minnesota All that part of the Northwest Quarter of Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30, Range 20, described as follows, to wit: Beginning at o point on the center line of the traveled rood locally known as Hospital Road of a point 455.98 feet north of the South line of said tract, and running thence east on on o line parallel to said South line of said tract 665 feet to an iron pipe monument; thence northwesterly by o deflection ongle of 95 degrees 34 minutes to the left 97.85 feet to an iron pipe monument; thence by a defection angle of 57 degrees 25 minutes to the left 115.6 feet to on iron pipe monument; thence by a deflection angle of 2 degrees 30 minutes to the left 197.8 feet to an iron pipe monument; thence by o deflection angle of 30 degrees 14 minutes to the left 155.4 feet to on iron pipe monument; thence by a deflection angle of 8 degrees 12 minutes to the left 218.4 feet to the center line of said rood; thence south along said center line to the point of beginning, subject to the public rood above referred to. All of the foregoing lying and being in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, and containing 2.26 acres, more or Tess. Also the following described of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30, Range 20; Beginning at a point on the center line of the traveled road locally known os Hospital Rood at a point 302.7 feet north of the South line of said tract, and running thence east on a line parallel to said South line of said troct 672.9 feet to on iron pipe monument; thence northwesterly by a deflection angle of 95 degrees 34 minutes to the left 153.9 feet to an iron pipe monument; thence west on a line parallel to said South line 665 feet to the center line of said road; thence southerly olong said center line of said road 153.28 to the point of beginning, subject to the public road above referred to. All the same lying and being in the County of Washington and State of Minnesota, and containing 2.26 acres, more or less. • 61 O (DEED) SURVEY NOTES Field survey completed by E.G. Rud and Sons on September 9, 2004. Curb shots ore of top and bock of curb. Bearings shown are on the Washington County Coordinate System. This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements or encumbrances moy exist other than those shown. Survey subject to review upon receipt of title work. VICINITY MAP LEGEND DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT DENOTES EXISTING TREE DENOTES CATCH BASIN DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES GATE VALVE DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD DENOTES TELEPHONE PEDESTAL DENOTES TELEPHONE MANHOLE DENOTES ELECTRICAL MANHOLE DENOTES RECORD DISTANCE OR BEARING AS RECITED IN CERTIFICATE OF TITLE DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LAND MARK NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE www.egrud.com ( IN FEET ) JOB# 044628T M IL TREE INVENTORNr StILLWAtER tOUJN OFFICE BITE DEVELOPER ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 WEST COUNTY ROAD SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 TELE (651) 483 5518 / / \ / E SITE ADDRESS 1749 CsREELEY ST S STILLWATER MN 55082 DEED *�- -,4' �ALKE1 — f —918— _/b_,� 1 — 1 I / I C� RUD 4 SONS, INC Land Surveyors 918CD LEXINC:TON AVENUE NE CIRCLE PINES MN 55m14-3625 Tel 763 186 5556 F8x163 186 6301 PROPERTY OWNER OCsREN PROPERTIES GROUP PO BOX 15 STILLWATER MN 55082 \ II SE3 54 02 W 1 \\ )55 50 - -_____ \ _ -696- 1 - 6 15 ¢ �'-} \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ -^ / \\ \ \ \ N z./ a` m n -, •9 Jry' l 4 / /—mRAID �9p4_ _ bL / \ a„ ) r \ \a, Y14; \ \-- de N. J — /mil — '2n'"'z —906— \ / \ r �� \ r \ \ • \ / \ \—/ \ \\ \ \ \ \2 `ae \'"� i,- \\ \\ \ N \ \ o y a Fe \teas Aso \ \ \ \ \ \�6',' / ` \ \ \ \\ \o \ \ e1- \ OIEIWY6 \ �12� \ \1`aans\ \ \8›s\ \ _ \ \O E9Rr4°'a \ \ N \ wr¢e \ \ \ '4e\ \ \\ \ \ \9 \ \ UM \ \ PWa \ \ \ \ 8j \ s° \ \ \ \ \ N. \ \ "ra j �\ ,\\\. \\ \ \ 22 \ \\ \\ \�\w N 1>\\ \ \ \PaPntz\ \ \ \ \ w \ uee m\ 2 — \ \ \ .y .f . \ \ \ \ \ \ea"• \ 2zae \2u ae R� \ \ \ \ \ 4in '\PeQ 2 'No 222 \L\ta\\ ls\ \ re�� \ / / \ \/ \\ wa,\�\\ \ I• vt�sl\ t° ' \ p�1�"�\ „cloy s��{\f2v/ PP \\ — _�/ \`\ \\ x/ \ \ �0.3 44 l l / \ \r� '0�••4•\re4\ \ d'bwe\ \ \ \ Sz \ \ \ 1 r \ \ a 1Am \ 1 O7c� \ \ N \ GRAPHIC SCALE www egrud com y5 / // l / ll \\ „fi• 3 } a \ aau4� // l / / / N \ 'uEs Pere � �„ � �'F n \ T ve \ / / / / / / \ PO H \ PWE O ' 7 4' 1\ \ 1 1 ° \ Pi \ .D / C 1 I PWErt 4{ mPP�m 4 \°" / / / I 1 I �wt PNE 23 I I \ \ —s7D—� ////r/// I I / / I �I u �a I P.I dw1 \ J5 1 1 \ /i9\9\b////////J\ // / /lA 11 r�2r an„ \\ \I \ I3 PwE 1 ////i9\s //// 11 I, / i o .w. \ \ / // / / / /9 / b I IwE FW 4* —'//_ �/�/// ////�g2°/ 1 \1PW� \1 ICE I �I� P 2\I II 11 �.1 / 2 ~ ' ' / / / / > �PWE G6YEY ae 1 I �I I FwEake \gr \ : A.+... P•® \ i 2027 Piik 01. p },ry2 YrK`"" PWY �PWE `w/F • W ` P� 1 PME i M �\ / '� C. — — .s\. \ — — T DRANK BY O2W CJ4EC7 BY .ER JOB NO 04462 IDAIE 09/08/05 04162 TREE INVENTORY 2 NO DATE DESCRIPTION 9Y 673 69 (672 9 DEED) N89 47 54 E R `0 EIA16f \ 23 \ °w%( T WI �s999 \ \ d ESP I hereby certify that this survey plan or report was prepored by me or under my drect supervision and that I om a duly Registered Lond Surveyor under the laws of the State of M nnesota 101NESOT4 J400N E 600 576 \ CIRCLE FINES. L e\ 4r �S� ( IN FEET ) Lmh 30 fL NORTH NOTES - FIELD WORK COMPLETED BY E G RUD AND SONS ON AUGUST 18 19 AND 22 2005 - ALL TREES 6 IN CALIPER AND GREATER ARE LOCATED ON THIS SURVEY LEGEND • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT •O DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LAND MARK DENOTES ELM/MAPLE/CHERRY TREE DENOTES OAK TREE DENOTES PINE TREE DENOTES BIRCH TREE DENOTES CEDAR TREE TREE INVENTORY LIST NUMBER TYPE/SIZE 2000 POPAL22 2210 CEDAR9 2358 PINE14 2001 ELM7 2211 POPAL20 2359 PINE6 2002 MAPLE8 2219 E1047 2360 E12410 2003 MAPLEII 223J OAK6 2364 PINE6 2004 MAPLES 2234 OAK8 2367 ELM72 2005 BIRCH7 2235 ELM11 2368 PINE10 2006 MAPLE9 2236 OAK14-2 2371 PINE9 2008 SPRUCE12 2237 OAKY 2374 PINEI2 2009 SPRUCEII 2238 OAK8 2375 CEDARI2 2010 SPRUCEI4 2239 OAK17 2394 CEDAR? 2011 SPRUCE24 2240 OAK17-2 2397 PINE9 2012 SPRUCE22 2241 CHERRY6 2398 CHERRY6 2013 SPRUCE20 2242 PINE 73 2398 ELM6 2014 SPRUCE24 224J PINEII 2401 PINE1 2077 PINEI3 2244 PINEI2 2403 ELMS 2018 PINE)) 2245 PINE14 2405 EL46 2019 PINEY 2246 CEDARS 2423 OAK10 2026 CEDAR8 2261 PINE9 2425 PINEII 2027 CEDAR6 2263 OAK13 2426 P774E10 2088 CHERRY6 -2 2264 OAK9 2428 PINE? 2117 PINE14 2265 OAK9 2428 PINE? 2118 PINE14 2266 ELM7 2430 PINE10 2126 CHINESE ELM6 2267 OAK12 2128 PINE16 2268 OAK13 2431 MEW 2129 PINE14 2270 OAK8 2432 P1NE12 2130 PINE10 2271 OAK10 2433 P774E70 2133 PINE8 2273 OAK'S 2434 PINE13 2134 PINE71 2276 PINE9 2435 PINE? 2135 PINE14 2277 ELM9 2436 PINE10 2136 P774614 2278 PINE10 2437 P774E13 2137 PINE8 2279 P774E14 2438 P79E16 2138 PINEI3 2280 PINE7 2439 OAK6 2139 PINEI4 2281 PINE71 2440 OAK7 2140 PINE19 2282 P774E70 2441 047<13 2141 PINE9 2283 PINE9 2442 OAK6 2142 PINE10 2284 P774E9 2443 P774E13 2143 PINE10 2285 PINE70 2444 PINEI3 2145 PINE14 2286 PINEY 2445 PINEI3 2146 PINE6 2288 ELM6 2446 PINEIO 2147 PINE10 2289 ELMIO 2447 PINE10 2148 PINE7 2295 PINEII 2448 OAK15 2149 PINEY 2296 PINE71 2449 PINEII 2150 PINE9 2297 PINE8 2450 PINE71 2162 P774E7 2298 P774E72 2453 OAK12 2454 OAK12 2163 P774E18 2299 PINE104 2164 PINEI3 2300 PINEII 2454 OAK 2165 PINE9 2301 PINE14 2455 OAK6 245E ELM? 2166 PINEII 2304 ELMS 245 2167 PINE9 2312 CEDARS 2768 PINEII 2314 ASH6 2468 OAK8 8 3 OOAKS 2460ELM7 2169 PINEII 2326 ELM11 2170 PINEI3 2338 PINE6 2461 ELM6 2462 ELM6 2171 PINE14 2339 PINElO 2465 ELMS 2172 PINE10 2340 PINE6 2466 P774E18 2173 P774E8 2345 ELM9 2467 E1046 2174 PINE13 2346 PINE14 2175 PINE15 2347 PINEI2 2176 PINE10 2348 PINE9 2177 PINE10 2349 PINEII 2350 PINE10 2178 PINE10 2351 PINEI2 2179 PINE18 22352 PINEI2 180 PINE8 2354 P7NE13 2181 PINE10 2354 PINEI2 2182 PINEI3 2355 PINE12 2189 ELM10 2356 PINEI2 2190 PINE10 2357 PINE12 2191 PINEI2 2193 PINEI2 PINE ROW A INCLUDES 9 PINE TREES WHICH ARE 1 7 1-72 3-10 4 9 PINE ROW B INCLUDES 18 PINE TREES, WHICH ARE 1 70 7-9 6-8 2 6 2-7 Dote 9 8 Zoos License No 47578 — — CENTERLINE OF S CREEL ] ROAD AS TRAVELED ®s a - = a 7470 COUNTY 9'7z 1-fIGNWAY NO 66 �3e> S GREELEY L-irs92 STREET 153 64 (153 28 DEED). Ii- 08 4, 8 Ica 8 0 tv 1 1 A N- mOtO m co -a V a)ca -a n (- -- ., tv --a - O (0 0, V O,Na W N'a 0 a LOT AREAS O to 0 cr. b u O N Ol t0 co a 00 N N N t0 N a co0000005'D Na N t0 tD a a N N N t0 a a 1, N t0 Nt0 N N N N t0 N N O) a N N t0 tD N N OOl N N N t0 N A t0(., N N b N a N W t0 N t o t0 O N rnC Arn tin. m m a a. a v t O 0 a to 0 O STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN City of Stillwater Minnesota PROPERTY DESCRIPTION C rtilk0f / RO N 27872 R gl t / Plies Off e. Washington Car Or Mm All N t part I th Northwest Quarts I Southwest Warta). / Sec1:0n 33, r wnshlp 30 Rang 20 described as fan ors 1 e1L Beginning 1 paint 0n th center II I th trawled rood locally kn .w H solid Road t p MI 455.98 leaf orth I N 5 1 On I sold Ira 1 and m In TOO east 0n on I parallel t said South IN I Bold Iry ! 665 I (1 an Iron pip 1 then ortnwa.ledy by deflection anal / B5 degree, 34 minutes t th It 9785 h 1 l an Iron pip monument thence by d faction ongl 157 degrees 25 mlnut t th I R 1156 feet an man pas monument th nc by deflection angl 12 degrees 30 'abates t th 1 ft 1978 feat t on hen pm monument th ce by 0 0 ton anal 130 d gr es 14 min lee t lh It 55 feet t an hen pip man leant. th y d fl Hon ang 18 d grew 12 min 1 t th left 2Id4 feet L th enla Ion I M road, (n oath along said cents lln t th point I begin Ng subject l th public ro d thaw bred to AI f (h foregoing lyn9 and being in th County I Washington, St t I MN meta, and sat inin9 226 auee. mow or Also th log Ng described I sold N0159.0 t Quarter I N South est Quarts I Se II 33 7 snsldp 30 Range 20 Beginning ! point an the center tin I th trawled road lewdly known as Hospital Ro d ! post 3027 feat north I N South IN I said tract and running thence Bost on M pool el sold South tin I rod tract 8729 Teel 1 an don pipe man m0M Nan lhwesterly by 0 8ecUon 9 195 degree 34 sal 1 t th 1 ft 153 9 feat t on bon pipe mamas t than 1 on N parallel I ! said 5o al lin 665 1 t t M ter Inf said rtherm0. therm autherly Wong sold center tin 1 said road 15318 1 Ih paint I Cou ly beginning. Wo t0a an0 public nibs so a ab Im,ddto. Alf Ur erom contorig 226 Ove& more 0 Ise.and beIng th PID'S 33-030-20-32-0005 33-030-20-32-0004 SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING BP-1 PROPOSED ZONING BP-1 GROSS AREA = 5 14 AC NET AREA = 4 92 AC TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 282 AC (57 27) EXISTING BUILDING = 3565 S F NEW BUILDING = 53 514 S F 57 079 S F TOTAL — 300 S F/STALL 190 PARKING STALLS REQUIRED 196 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED II II 11 II II II II II 11 II II II 11 II II 0 J 0 U SCALE 5 R II 11 11 II II 11 u 11 11 II a \ II IL II II II 21 4 21 —11 4 L1 J I 19 3565 S F OUSTING BUILDING (TO REMAIN) 5 J EE 9' 15 2368 S F 18 2368 S F EXTEND SEWER & WATER SERVICES INTO BUILDING 0 LOCATION DETERMINED BY OWNER 2368 S F 18 2368 S F 0 R4 583 54 02 W 155 50 (155 4 DEED) 12 2368 S F 13 2368 S F 14 2368 S F TRASH ENCLOSURE iJ �vgy 9y�9� ?? 673 69 (672 9 DEED) N89 47 54 E 47 !is i, s 041- Lwa4L...ws�dta°en yh 5514.l dal I ' 1 I M y lli$gwl .!G'f�pl. WM SS Y 1, J ► ,4T.o4W,T5s 3, it l t l tri W VICINITY MAP W an orsLj. �1S1TE " l j � @"'�, �, y .f tabu aCIN en; N ^ ',Ls"! t,rl}Vr SITE ADRESS 1749 GREELY ST S STILLWATER MN 55082 3890 S F 8 3054 S F 3054 S F 3890 S F 3054 S F 1 la h= 30 IL 0E370NED BY CWP OPAWN BY CAUL CHECKED BY. C.WP 9/ 2/05 St boo PRWECr NO. 04875 n1E I h reby certify that Vu plan oat p p red by m nd my d at suprnm dlf111 m d7 Lfce dProf I Eng ear under th low I th St t / M t0 Ch les W PI wa DATE 10/10/05 UCENSE / T8277 9IE P800000 tN8NEER9l0 PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC 91610 IEXINGTON AVENUE NE CIRCLE PINES MN 55014 3825 PRONE f63) 073 NC P 736-6007 ARCHITECT MOONFBJ/ HAAGEN 1415 E VA2crtaTU LsGRO Oo Wyatt MN 55391 P7.n7 (882) 3- B86 Pon Wow 73- .110 PREPARED Mit ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 County Rood E W t 5h ran MN 55126 FROND (66) 481 56 8 801E 7/22/05 Cl STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN City of Stillwater Minnesota GFNFRAL NOTES. ME ON SLOTH ON THESE CONCERNING * LOCATION COSTING 0NO GUARANTEED TOO BE UR 110 0R ALL N0LMVE THE CONTRACTOR 5 RESPONSIBLE FOR MARINO S OAN DETERMINATION AS TO THE TYPE AND 10CA ON OF U111 E5 A5 Y BE NECFSSM 10 MD DAMAGE TO THESE utI111fS. 2) CONTACT GOP ER ST 1E ONE -CALL AT 85 454-0002 FOR DIMING UR111Y LOCATIONS 3) THE CCNIRACIOR SHALL FIELD NERVY SZE LOOM..., AND ETEV 110N OF COSTING SANITARY SEMEN R 1FA SINN. AND STERN SEWER AND OTIFY ENGI EER OF ANY D SCPEPANCIES PRIOR 10 TIE START OF MSTNLAT101 INSTALLATIONS SHALL CMIFOR TO THE OTT OGINERS ASSO0 110N OF YNNE50T (CEIW) STANDARD UIWTY SPE0F1CATOHS (199 ED111ON) AN THE Ott CV s11LL ATER STANDARD SPE0fCA11015. DDEEPARTQNTT TRACTOR AT ((8851) 4300-B8330FT Ott A 28MI 1 OF PUBLIC PRRIIOE 10 AN NIERRUPI1N OF SANITARY SEWER OR IS TER SERVES TO COS 0 HOMES ON BUSINESSES STRFFT ANO ITUMINOUS NOTES I) SAM-OUT EIBSTNG NIUYNOU MD CONCRETE CURB TO OVIDE BUTT JOINT 2) REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL Of DOMINO STREET MATERIALS AS REWIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION IS INCIDENTAL 3) RESTORE DISTURBED STRUT 10 DIMING OR GETTER SECT AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. ) OON1RAC10H SHALL USE TRAFBC CONTROL MEASURES (N ACCORDANCE NMI TH laxraz501 ARUN. OF NIFOR TRAFFIC O011R0. DEUCES') AS NECESSARY WHENEVER OGONO UTI UIY OR VI WERA11E15 O0tEA0H ONTO MN COT STREETS CURB NOTES. BACK FIWNO OF ORBS MIN ON SIE M TE IA13 N MODEMAL 10 CURB CON51WC11Utt 2) CURB AND CUTTER SHOWN SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OINERMSE NOTED ON PLANS. STORM SFWFR NOTES. ) STORM OMOM SEWER MALL ON BE RCP PUNS (CLASS FEMUR) OR HOPE UNLESS 2) STORM SERER IDIOMS 41000E THE LAYING LENGTH OF THE APRON. SCALE LEGEND _» _ El —980- 980- — s — x8B085 t mh= 30 ft P oposed Reta I g W II Exist ng Storm Sewe Pr posed Storm Sewer Exist ng Hyd ont Proposed Hydrant Existing San tory Manhole Proposed Sanitary Manhole Proposed Catch Bos n/Manhole Direction of Surface Drainage P oposed Conto r Exist ng Contour Existing Gas L ne Existing 0 erhead W es Silt Fence Proposed Spot El at on (N to P p ed sp t elevation sh g d eu 7 es bit m eu ( or gutter II leas ih I t d ) VJ..N. Existing Spot Elevat on =v=e v213.4 46 90A 441 II II 11 II 11 0 OT 305 REMOVE COSTING BITUMINOUS I CURB & GRAVEL (REPLACE W/TOPSOIL & SOD) 819- EMOVE EXI511N0 BITUMINOUS CURB & GRAVEL (REPLACE W/ TOPSOIL & SOD) 948 �Ty9H' BBeB9'4 P0itD NWL 899 30 HWL 909,48 tpg0BD 1 1 +*° 60 i I I + ,52 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE r MF WALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES to meows Poen el moon t MCr ra � wa m.'gw a.mmfr. �MS-z.mPANIM lmA4A.rs.aw.w Seam =A. E..— _,..,. SILT FENCE 0>B 89 0 8880 +BIT 4690. UESICNEO BY CWP 9/12/05 SR layout & grad" 9 rem Ions 10/07/175 00d1ng revision atom, sewer re isions DRAWN BY CALA I h reby rtly th t this p1 prepared by rn de my Erect superns d Ih t I m d ly LA: 1190CProt a nal EEn^nglnneoo d //,y,Ay/���0la7 the 0770tf F My I 1 511E PENDING 001EERNG PLOWE ENOINEERINg INC 9780 LE.0140704 AVENUE NE CIRCLE PINES]] MN 55014 J625 MOND 763 IOU FAX('762) 788-6007 ARCHITECT.4Os.FTEN HASSEY 14A E� TE CRAUL GROUP S to 200 Wyrato MN 55391 Rana Fare (9E2)) 3952) 3-- 3s PREPARED FOR ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 Cou ty Rood E West Sh0 w MN 55126 PEi0M0 (as) 405-35 6 DATE 7/22/05 SHEET C2 CHECKED BY C MP PROJECT O. 04075 DATE RLVOoN DATE 10/25/05 UCFNSE 78277 STILL WA TER TOWN OFFICES PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN City of Stillwater Minnesota GENERAL NOTES. 1NE INFORM nON SHOWN ON THESE 0RATING5 CONCERN TYPE AND LOCATION OF COSTING MUTES 5 0 GUARANTIED TO BE CCURAIE OR ALL INCLUSIVE THE CONTRACTOR 5 RESPONSIBLE FOR MING H5 MN DEIaaD M ON AS TO THE TPE AND LOCATION OF UT1U11E5 AS Y BE NEC05SIA TO AVOID DAMAGE 10 RIESE MITES. 2) CONTACT GOPHER ST 1E ONE -CALL 65 151 -0032 FOR EXIST G MIT LacAnW S. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL non VERIFY SIZE. LOCATOR AND CEV TON OF COSTING SAHrTAR SEWER TER AN• MD STORM SEVER AND N011FY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR 1 THE 5 AR OF INSTALLAIUNS ) NSTMUTONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINN60 (CERA) STANDARD U TT SPEOFICA DNS ( 99 EDI ON) AND 111E OTT OF STO.LWATER STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 5) CONTRACTOR SHALL OTIY CITY OF 5'IOLW HER PUBLIC WORKS DEPAIr1MEN T (651) 430-663D M08110 Ci 2 HOURS PRIOR 70 ANY NIEW6IPIION OF SANMAA FIVER OR 1Oi SEA CE 10 COSTING HOMES OR BUSIIIMF-S STRFFT ANDJ)ITIIM(NOILS N0TF4 1) SAW -CUT COSTING BINWNWS AND CONCRETE CURB TO PROVIDE UTT JOIN 2) REMOVAL AND 0L405AL OF F305TW STREET MATERIALS AS REWIRED FOR COxSDWCTa S N00EM AL 3) Es10RE D511R1® STREET TO COSTING OR BETTER SECTION AS APPROVED R EIONEEFLL ) DO11000T0R SHALL USE 1RARIO CONTROL MEASURES (N ACCORDANCE YAM TIE 'M NNESOTA MANUAL OF UN FORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES) AS NECESSARY WHENEVER GRAD 0 UT( 0 0NG OPERA ONS ENCROACH CARD ADJACENT STREETS CURB NOTES. ) BACK CURB C IRO OII 61TI 01-9TE MATERIALS 15 MOORAL 10 2) CURB AND GrnER 910VN SHALL BE 6812 UNLESS 01161V1SL DIED ON PLANS WATER MAIN NOTES 1) MMNIAIN M NUM OF 7S FEET OF OVER OVER WATER SERACE. 2) W TEA SIR CE TO BUDDING SHALL BE DIP CUSS 52 GALES OIHFABISE NOTED. 3) REID VERIFY SS AND LOCATION OF COSTING WATERMNN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER W ANY GS0EPANCES PRIOR TO TIE START OF C0N51R CRON. SANITARY SFWFR NOTES. 1) 00511 0 5AN•TAR SEWER LOCATORS SNAIL BE WIRED N FIELD BOOR TO COHSIR000ON 2) SANITARY SEWER SERVILE 10 BU 1NN0 SHALL BE 6 PVC STERILE 40 0NLIMS °T110919 E NOTED 3) FIELD VERIFY LOCATION SIZE AND DIVER ELEVATION OF DOSING SANITARY SEWER AND TOY ENGIEFR Of AN NSCAEPA6GES PRIOR TO THE START IN CONSTRUCTION SCALE 1) h=30 (L LEGEND Existing Waterma n E sting Son tary Sewe E 'sting Storm Sewer Proposed Watermaln Proposed Sanitary Sewer Proposed Sto m Sewer • Ex st ng Hydra t Proposed Hydra t t( E 'sting Sa tory Manhole ® Proposed San tary Manhole 0 ® Proposed Catch Basin/Manhole EX MH RE 9035 IE 890 TEE 891 CNNECT TO EXISTMG WATERMMON W/ 8 X 6 TAPPING VALVE & SLEEVE RESTORE STREET EQUAL OR 06571N0 5 CONNEC1 J00 l0SW1OC=bf W/ 8 PORE DRILL RE 90285V\,A,VA ILl1• & E 899.�T- ES', IR IESW 893 07 t l�t'kk A IRE) 03 _>d E z71I11111 A TEE .91 9_ DeTECr�ORE P y �(+ SEWER (42 b 2$ L') (a lltJa`T ry - GY v REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING BIT AND CURB AS REQUIRED FOR UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION 15 STORM SEW (ARV 892 30) 6 PVC SAN SEW (TOP OF PIPE EL 890 95) AT CROSS EXTEND SEWER & WATER SERVICES INTO BUILDING ® LOCATION DETERMINED BY OWNER 45 15 HOPE 0 4 60X Op aM B�1 E 903 .14 " y�+9I�` IS BEND 12 STORM SEW (INV d 900 48) 6 DIP WATER (TOP OF PIPE EL 897 12) AT CROSSING '" "} "f •F STORM SEWER SCHEDULE R E INV DESCRIPTION CASTING CB 1 903 70 IE I E 899 06 (N & E) 899 50 (SW) 48 0 NEENAH R-3067V CB 2 905 40 I E 901 48 2 X 3 NEENAH R-3067V CB 3 904 20 I E 899 34 48• 0 NEENAH R-2668 CB 4 904 68 I E 899 88 48" 0 NEENAH R-2668 CB 5 905 30 IE 900 08 48 0 NEENAH R-2668 CB 6 904 75 I E 901 00 48" 0 NEENAH R-2668 CB 7 905 00 I E 901 20 48" 0 NEENAH R-2668 f R 8-65 4r� Imr41PEf .t " gs ry 90 •+E�r�a %V60 0y9 y1 •, 751 .21 M � M15y` Lry IEi90D O,LB J �N�.�N. J;3 �(I..,��nx'L.1) G'6.'•4x"'". id 19"-I �g (� A iuj� `y �a� t <4 `Ti ss h` h8"4 L hl •a R1 't^L `!��S llw•�-. 'l>I��11`I,,y�,, s 2' n •1r ,Lr e XOAATEvVAyF.iy k ° yp�' r;s h �'�aV3L �'` P P^ �[�`•zt _¢ � `( T "l`FIFIt° 'N� <{ � 11 J^��iV'"•�7•',�'W'1$'�i k��{, 4N' ,N it ''VAR 9' 'T .,07)•. J ° a x� err FN) x..ry ts.l 1 ¢ 1G2s ltbs .4"9. o,1" {`rs f x ler�1 eK e — e ) ( la Cfr K ryr �T�ti H>,'rDY'F�w'sasC'r s,�h'1�4i4 �i bc'•�� . 5'`(v}�i Y��i-�, l,Il, ,y"+R7 v[ 1 v L Y• �x'ti�`41?��A`r 2 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP W/ FABRIC 7 B PVC DRAIN NOTE INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES 0 MINIMUM SLOPE (1 07) TO BUILDING 9/ 2/05 Oredlng revisions 10/07/05 Eroding newtons, et •m Boer m4 orM I h by erldy th t th pl prepared by m der I SITE PI.WwNG my direct sup m Ian d Ih t l m d ly Lae d Prof w I Engird lh I I th St 1 I MI sot OES.0 ED BP GW P DRAWN By CAU CHECKED BY GWP PROJECT NO o4B 5 042 DATE Pb 10/25/05 Limn. O 18277 ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING INC 9180 LEXNGTON AVENUE NE CIRCLE PINES MN 55014 3625 mate 83.T)3) 780 04AX 3 ARCNRLT MOQAH1511/ HANSBd ARCHITECTURAL GROUP 1415 E Wyzat BI d S t 200 Wyz t MN 55391 Fer BOO A 34D PREPARED FOR ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 C tyR d EW 5h row w MN 55126 PRONE (es) 461 SS DAZE 7/22/05 SHEET C3 NOTES. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR PLANTING IN ALL R0 W LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY EFFECT HIS WORK CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 681 484 0002 (METRO) 800 282 1166 (MN TOLL FREEI LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHERS AT 917E AND COMPLETE HIS WORK PER OWNERS CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED ONE (11 PULL YEAR UPON TOTAL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER WITH ONE TIME REPLACEMENT AT APPROPRIATE TIME OR UPON REQUEST OF OWNER REPLACEMENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE CLEAN FREE OP STONES WEEDS AND OTHER UNDESIRABLE DEBRIS PLANTING SOIL MIX (INCIDENTAL COST ITEM( 1 MIX 1 LB 5 20 20 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER PER CU YD TOPSOIL 2 THOROUGHLY MIX 1 PART SAND AND 1 PART PEAT MOSS WITH 5 PARTS FERTILIZER AND TOP SOIL USE PLANTING SOIL AT ALL LOCATIONS PER DETAILS THIS SHEET MIN 18 DEPTH IN ALL PERENNIAL PLANT ZONES LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY TOPSOIL DEPTH AND NOTIFY OWNER OP ANY DEFICIENCY SOD SHALL BE CULTURED WITH PREDOMINATELY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED OP RECENT DISEASE RESISTANT INTRODUCTIONS NO GUARANTEE ON SOD EXCEPT ANY SOD NOT SATISFACTORY AT TIME OF COMPLETION INSPECTION SHALL Be PROMPTLY REPLACED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OP JOB STAKE SOD ON SLOPES 51 AND GREATER EXISTING TREES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION STAKE HIGH VISIBILITY POLY FENCING AROUND EACH TREE AT DRIP LINE REMOVE DAMAGED DISPI0URE0 AND DESEA9E0 BRANCHES PRUNE POR HEALTHY GROWTH HABIT WHERE EXISTING CONCRETE/ ASPHALT AREAS ARE TO BE REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPING PROVISIONS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COORDINATE EXCAVATION OP SUBSOIL TO A DEPTH OF 2 WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR REPLACE WITH COMPACTED TOPSOIL ALL AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED SEEDED AND SODDED SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH AND EVEN LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR I9 RESPONSIBLE FOR SODDING ALL AREAS WHICH ARE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ALL R 0 W AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES BOULDER STONE OUTCROPPINGS SHALL CONSIST OP DULUTH BLUE STONE ROCK BOULDERS VARYING 18 60 IN DIAMETER STONE SHALL BE FIELD PLACED AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VARY HEIGHT AND BURY DEPTH TO CREATE PLANTING POCKETS AND ROCK CASCADES PILL VOIDS A9 NEEDED WITH to 8 BLUE STONE GRAVEL/ COBBLES LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 8 DEPTH NATURAL CULTIVATED EDGE BETWEEN LAWN AND MASSED LANDSCAPE AND PLANTED AREAS USE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (PINE SHREDDED PINE BARK OR OWNER APPROVED EQUALI INSTALL 4 DEPTH NO PILTER FABRIC UNDER ORGANIC MULCHES ORGANIC MULCH TO BE PINE STRAW OR DECOMPOSED ORGANIC COMPOST LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR I9 RESPONSIBLE FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION PER CITY LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IRRIGATION DESIGN SHOULD ENCOMPASS ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WITH 50D AND/ OR PLANTINGS PROM CURB TO CURB RO W SHOULD BE IRRIGATED PROM SPRINKLER HEADS LOCATED WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARY CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN VICINITY OF ALL WALKS AND DRIVES TO MINIMIZE OVER SPRAY COORDINATE INSTALLATION OP ALL PVC SLEEVE UNDER DRIVE AREAS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR IRRIGATION DESIGN NOT LIMITED TO DRIP SYSTEMS IN ALL LANDSCAPE FEATURE AREAS AND IN Al L PI OWFR/PERENNIAI PI ANTING RPns, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ALL PAVEMENT AREAS AFTER ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE AND ACCEPTED BY OWNER GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO SWEEP PAVEMENT AREAS PRIOR TO TURN OVER TO OWNER NATIVE PLANT MIXES SPECIES LISTED FOR THE MIXED GROUPINGS ARE SUGGESTIONS. OTHER NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL MAY Be SUBSTITUTED OR ADDED MIXED PERENNIALS Attu logla conadonele (Condo Columbine). Aster poeclee. Comoanulo epeelee. Echlnaceo species Goum epee es. Puleonlla oaten. IPoeaue flower). Rudbookta epeelee MIXED GRASSES Corex oensvlvanlco (Pennevlva la Sedge). Ceechomp.ta ceeeolteea Muffed Ho r Grose) $chlzochvrlum ecooartum var. ecoo0Mum ILdtle Dlsavetoml, Sporobolue hate oleole IProtrle drooeeed) MIXED GROUNDCOVER A ctoetoohvlos uvo urel IBearberrvl. Aearam gonodo so IWdd singer) Cornue conadene 'Bauchberrv). Wald.tel la frogo IO dee vor jragorioldes (Barren etrawberrv) I T. I I o 161 1 I III I LANDSCAPE MASTEN PLAN BOULDER RETAINING WALL LOCATION AND HEIGHT PFR NG 0 A INOS SCALE P ■ SOLO, ro..04 avert Ann 44.441. • I4.317 Ca NERGENTrvvErLAND raeE snv.nnc NAME SEE0O4 nw•ds svr vrva..�R adu RATE WAIMMALIAMEWM Rumen MuMgLarimEIMM KW On WASS marillam MWM MANWIWITCTE clYfr IV SLR MU 1.4▪ 1 14.0044 WeammoMPSWIm MYCMAWMM CICULAC um Len um sen 144 LI) Sus 0o moo 4e --HR DDT O BA K UL jt ALL PLA }R AREAS AND PARKING LOT SLANDS SOD IMM 4 SHREDDED BARK M ALL PLANTING AREAS PARKING LOT ISLANDS KEY 'aj BOULDER OUTCROPPINGS NATIVE UPLAND SHORT GRASS/ WILDFLOWER MIX WETLAND PRAIRIE MIX NO MOW WOODLAND GRASS MIX BOULDER RETAINING WALL LOCATION AND HEIGHT PER ENO ▪ • RAWINGS tl 1- 0 N DRAINAGR REA AIN OAR 1 BOULDER RETAINING WALL LOC4ION AND HEIGH PER ENG DRAWINGS 1 PLANT MATERIAL KEY QUANTITY SIZE ROOT COMMON NAME TYPE BOTANICAL NAME PLANT MATERIAL KEY QUANTITY SIZE ROOT COMMON NAME TYPE BOTANICAL NAME O 24 2 CAL B&B NORTHWOOD MAPLE 63 61 }2 118 SPRI POT ANDORRA COMPACT JUNIPER A k retinue Norway C Jun e h zo tol Campo 1111 16 6 HT B&B PANE 61 05 112 SPRI POT BUSH HONEYSUCKLE PED DI rvll I n a 14 6 HT BOX EPXTRAn BLUE PINE 28 07 150 SPRI POT SPREADING SCOTCH PINE Extra P u eyly t H II ds C e p r' 24 05 190 HTI POT DWARF EASTER WHITE PINE PI ue rr buts No a O 15 18 CAL B&B QUAKING ASPEN P p I t mul d ill% 86 5 HT POT GRAY DOGWOOD IT P rml ® 225 01 POT MIXED NATIVE PERENNIALS C u r ma 197 01 POT MIXED NATIVE GRASSES 331 01 POT MIXED NATIVE GROUNDCOVER INSITTES 57E BANNING IANDSCME AKMIT TURF. 9905 A DI Ed P I MI 763 4 6 9573 55 37 Stillwater Town Offices Stillwater MN prdlea and bcayon 1 0706105 S lel L d capo R n 3 5 8 110 ul d notes ere 7 came maw pia apamnia ap ed wasod preperaa 7 me mo rtry foamed wmmo mma Ian, 147 Ind d tamarca. AJlad e w al me State NE M mob. D le \ $IOnpd Red N 14306 R b n J M II Landscape Plan h tdlle �\ �emN 1 30-0 draw I tes ch eked 1 tes ` ` del 07/22/2005 L3O1 Twee MASTER PLAN SCALE } ■ 90'-00 EXISTING TREELINE TO REMAIN NOT DDT 11.D. LnptK OVG CAD AOI CRDQ BLANC: CO, w ino MAMMAL Tee POOL DO NOT M rw LEA= AEYD'/E DEw MAD BAD eMxLMn AS 10E0E0 T¢ ww • PLANTDP2 DO. O CT BALL OP DElrw YAG' DC ewe art w¢wcn •PTCA TOED PLAmEn ACT BM - UNDCA DOT BALL ACT! weDAwD TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE EXISTING WOODLINE TO REMAIN 13 PINE 13e0AK PINE PLANT MATERIAL KEY QUANTITY SIZE ROOT COMMON NAME TYPE BOTANICAL NAME PLANT MATERIAL KEY QUANTITY SIZE ROOT COMMON NAME TYPE BOTANICAL NAME O 24 2 CAL B&B NORTHWOOD MAPLE f 61 82 115 SPRI POT ANOORRA COMPACT JUNIPER A sr rs brum IN rmwood Junlp rue h z TM Compa to 16 6 HT B&B RED PINE 61 83 (12 SPRI POT BUSH HONEYSUCKLE P us re nova DI rvlle I I o 14 6 HT BOX EXTRA BLUE LIMBER PINE �..f 28 87 (30 SPRI POT SPREADING SCOTCH PINE Prw fl I EAtr BI PI ylv t I H II d C p r' i1 24 85 130 HT) POT DWARF EASTER WHITE PINE PI b N o O 13 19 CAL B&B QUAKING ASPEN P p 1 I mul d SIP 4�' 56 5 HT POT GRAY DOGWOOD 1Tre F ml ® 223 81 POT MIXED NATIVE PERENNIALS o m e 41k* 187 81 POT MIXED NATIVE GRASSES 331 01 POT MIXED NATIVE GROUNDCOVER INSITES 5 TE PLANN NC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURES A905 A Ed P I MI 55 37 763 76 9573 J Stillwater Town Offices Stillwater MN 59 McAdoo 2 I Oct05 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 10 S tedL d cape on /h m y dad y Na NI pa pedlolbn or / pa as p ea me ode my Owl pa nd Ih I m *Icemen L M cape Arc I ad b of Slab I MI MO. Dt \ Sbnnd ReD N , 193013 RbertJM 11 "Landscape Plan Tree Master Plan h ItIOe J emle 1 30-0 drawn Insltes h kd 1st 1 data07/22/2005 BOULDER OUTCROPPINGS ITYPI HAND PLACE 24l 60 BOULDERS TO PORM FEATURES AND OUTCROPPINGS 1/3 TO 2/3 BURY 6 DEPT.H_ UI SRA PINT SHREDDED BARK MULCH OR OTHER APPROVED ORGANlr MULCH TYPICAL Al I PLANTING BEDS FOR THIS DEVEI OPMENT UNI Poo STATED OTHERWISE NO FILTER FABRIC UNDER ANY nRGANir M10 rH MAINTAIN MULCH DEPTH 1 BELOW WALK HEIGHT 0 1 l LANDSCAP! MATURE DETAIL 15 4 11 14 29 1.3 l SCALE 1 • 10t-01 NATIVE PLANT MIXES SPECIES LISTED FOR THE MIXED GROUPINGS ARE SUGGESTIONS OTtjEjj NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL MAY Be SUBSTITUTED OR ADDED MIXED PERENNIALS Aaudeala canadeneie (Canada Columbinel Aster soeelee. Camoanula species pehlnacea eoaove Geum epodes Pulex:mile. patens IPoeque flower), Rudbackla soectee MIXED GRASSES Carex oensvlvanlea (Pennev(vanto sedge) Deechamoela caesoltoea ITuftva Ha Gravel. San zachvnum e000ar um var Decoct -tom (Chits Bluesteml. S orobolue heterol•ols IP a r • el coasted) MIXED OROUNDCOVER Arctoetaohvloe uva urel IBearberrvl, Asarum canadvnee IWIId flu ger). Cerny* yanoaenele lbunchb•rrvl. Waldstelnta fragerloldee var frapariold•e (Barren ptrowb•rrvl } lc • 12 13 14 too t6, L! It 1I1 Lt.r 8et rr BOULDER OUTCROPPINGS ITYPI HAND PLACE 24 60 BOULDERS TO FORM FEATURES AND OUTCROPPINGS 1/3 TO 2/3 PI tier tIPP R 1 �1. Ir11 4, Wel Jr, TYPICAL UNIT PLANTU O Ob 6 DEPTH ULTRA FINE SHREDDED SARK MULCH OR OTHER APPROVED ORGANIC MULCH TYPICAL ALL PLANTING BEDS FOR THIS PEVELOPMENT UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE NO FILTER FABRIC UNDER ANY ORGANIC MULCH MAINTAIN MULCH DEPTH 1 BELOW WALK HEIGHT KEY 11, B 0 f : 14 30 25 52 SCALE f • 10L01 PLANT MATERIAL KEY QUANTITY SIZE ROOT COMMON NAME TYPE BOTANICAL NAME PLANT MATERIAL KEY QUANTITY SIZE ROOT COMMON NAME TYPE BOTANICAL NAME O 24 2 CAL B&B NORTHWOOD MAPLE 43 61 '02 118 SPRI POT ANDORRA COMPACT JUNIPER A ruhrum N maw etJ Ape u h Iz tal IC mp a '> 16 6 HT B&B RED PINE 61 !3 �12 SPRI POT BUSH HONEYSUCKLE PI re w DI r Ala to 1 ra 40 14 6 HT BOX EXTRA BLUE LIMBER PINE !"'4 �..f 28 07 130 SPRI POT SPREADING SCOTCH PINE PI n Al bar et P eyly t 1 H 11 de Cre p r 24 15 (30 HTI POT DWARF EASTER WHITE PINE P et obu N a, O 13 15 CAL B&B QUAKING ASPEN P pul (rem 1 d A .0. ' 56 5 HT POT GRAY 000W00D IT P ml ® 223 01 POT MIXED NATIVE PERENNIALS m a * 197 1.1 POT MIXED NATIVE GRASSES 331 01 POT MIXED NATIVE GROUNDCOVER INSITES 5 tE PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCH TEC111RE. 13905 A D I Ed P II MI 55 31 763 76 9573 Stillwater Town Offices Stillwater MN P led d location 1 Oct05 2 9 5 6 7 6 9 10 S te/L d aloe \ d otos / m r eb7 uP 1b3d pod 1.69P a port es pleas e0 y m n0e my nod Penrew nil ern dutytowmd Landscape A2Nlotl new metees dal slab Ilet oeaa SIpOffi Ran N 9306 R t7ert J M eh /Landscape Plan Planting Details heeldlte �\ dole 1 30-0 drown 1 tes checked 1 tes 0) ea 07/22/2005 K\JOBS\R y 10 k \ t11 1 1 1 1 L L 1 L 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 b. L 5.7.7.7 L L L L L L L 1 1 L L b Is L L I. 1 1 L L L 1 L L L L L 1 1 1. 1 L 1a L L L b L L 1 1 L m L 5. L L 1 1 1 1 m b. L I. m L L la 1 1 L L 1 1 L L b. L 1 1 1 L 1 L L L L h 1 1 b L L L �P)_ L bS L 5, 1 5 7 L L 5 1 1 6. L 1 1 Sc-L-I b L 1 1 1 1 1 1 La 1 1 1 1 la L L 5 b m b L 1 L 1 L m 1 ba m 1 5 1 1 1 1 7 L L b L as 1 1 I 1 1 m m la L 1 L m L L L L 1 b. L L L b be m 7 1 1 b 5 h L 1 1 1 b 1 0 • L b 1 L m m L 8 1 1 b L L L 1 L m L L L L L L 1 1 1 L 1 h L L L L L 1 1 L 1 1 b 1 1 L 1. 1 1 1 1 b I. L 1 1 5 L 1 • 1 1 1 1 L 5 L L 5e L 1 L 5. --. L It L la 1 L 1 5 la i7 � .\L L 1 la m 7 L L SEE L Its 1 b 1 1 L 7 5 1 1 b ba L L L 1a L 1 L b. „ L L BIRLDNG D REVERSE l b 1 L L 1 L b 1 1 1. 1 L 1 7,7.7,5 L b 1. la 1 1 b 1 L� _- 1. L 1 L L 1 L L L L L m b Ls 1.h b 1 b 7 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 L 1 b ha s1 1 laL b 1 1. la 1a -.. 5 7 1 Its 1 1 1 1 L )a Its1 L 5 b L 1 If5 L b L 1 L IA1 L 1. IS L I. 5 5 L 5 m L 5• •5• L L b L 1a 5 5 .ram=. 5. 1, a v s, 1 1 1 ter 1 1. 1 m 1. L 5 1 ha 1, L La L 1 1. .. Is la L \ S m le Is Is L b 1 IA L 1. L 1 I. L L 5 L 1 „ as 1 1 L b. a L la la L L 1 L 1 13 L 5( BIADING E _ h L L la L h b 1 L Is1 L 131 1, 0 Vs 11 L m L L 1 L L L L 53 \ ,_,,. L ▪ L bd L 1 1 1 5 5 5 le laL y L t ' 1 „ .+ .• - I. 1 la 1... laY 5. 1. 1 5. lee5 1 1 -1-1 1. 1 la 5. a '1� y�0- L 1 L 1 1 1 1 L 1. „ 1. L 5 1. 1 la_ Its L L L 1. L L L lab 1. 1 L S. L 5. L 1. 1J 1l L b I. L la I. La b la. la EXISTING BUILDING L 1. L 5.L 1 L L L L 1 1 m L 1 b 1 1 1 1 1 1 b 5 7 1 7 1 m 1 1 1 L L L L m 1 L 1 L m L 1 L 1. I L L L L L L 1 1 L 1. L L 1 L L L 1 1 La 1 L b. b L L 1 L L be L L L 1 1 1 1 L L as 1 1 1 1 L L 1 1. L L L L L L m L b b 1 5 1 1 1 L L L L 1 L 1 1. 1 5 L 1 L m 1a 1 1 1 1 1 L b L 1 1 5, L 1 L L L 1 L L L L 1a L L b 1 L 1 7. L L L 1 L L L L L L L 1 L 1 L 1 1 L L I. L 1 L b L b 7 7 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 m b 1 1 1 L 1 L 1 7 1 1 la 1 1 1 5. 1 1 b L L 1 1 L 1 L 1 L L L 1 1 1 L 1 1 5 L 5 , ._ L L 1 1 L b L L 5 7 L Is Y m L L L 1 m L L L h m L l SL a '1 L 5 5 1 1 1 „ 1, 1, 1 5 1 1 559E ,,b ba bo bo 1 ] t. 5, ,. 1- ] 5 1 la 5. 5 1 i�Y\� L 1. 5 1 1 1 L L L 1. 1 1 I `\41 7 ] - L la 1, i 1 5 1 5 5 I �I L la L i L 1 L 1 ] L 5 L - L L L 1 1. 1 L 1 5• 5• 1 8UDDNC ii A 5 L L5 1 L11 L bs L L 1 1 L 1 L 1 I 1 ) m 1 1 1 5 i ]) 1 1 5t' L 1 „ 11---'r,- h L L L L L „ L L L m L 5 L L L L L L L L L L L 5 1 L 1 L L L L L 1 5 -1-Th- 1a 1, L Sa ba L 1 I. L 7 L L L L L 1. L L 1 1 L b. 1 b 1. L L L L L 1 1 L L L L L 1 I. L 1 L L 1 1 L 1 ih 1 1 1 b 1. 1. 1, 1 L 1 L L L L b L L b b 1 1 1 1 5 L 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 b 1 1, L 1 5 L 1 L +- 5 7. b L. b. b. b. la 6, 5, 5, 5. 1, 1. .. ., 5. v. 1. 1. i. v 5 5 5 v a . . 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1. 5, 1. 1. 5. 5. 5. t. h. t. L 1 1 1 1 L 1 L 1 L I. L L 1 1 L 1 I. 1 L L L L L 1 1 L L L L L 1 L 1 L L L L L L L L L 1 L L L L L L L 5. L L 13 1 1 1 L L L b L L L L 1 I L 1. L 1 1 L L L L L L I. L 1 1 L L L L L L 1a L 6731691. 1 L L L L L 1 1. L b. L L L b. L L L L L L L L L 12 L L L 5. 1 1 1 7 h 1 1 1 l 7 1 L 1 L 1 L 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 L 1 1 L L L 4672 6 4E6I))L L Ise b. b 1 7 L L L 1. 5 L 1 L 1 1 L L b L L L 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 7 1 I. 1 L b 1 1 L I L 1NQ9 . 7 4 1 L L 1 1 1 I 1 I. L 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 L L b L L L L L L L 1. L 1 L L L L L L 1a 1 L L I. L L L L L 1a 1 L L 1 L L 1 1 L 1 L m L 1 L L m L L 1 L L L L L L L L 1 L L L L 1. 5 1 L 1 L 1. b I L 1 1 1 5 L L L L L L L I L L 1 L 1 L 1 L L I. I L L La 6. 1 1 1 1 L L 1 L L L 1 1 1 1 L L 5 L 1 b L 1 L b L L 1 1 L L L 1 L L b. L I. L L L L 1 1 b 1 L L L L L 13 L L L 1 L L L 1 1 L 1 L L L L L b 12 I. 1 L 133 1 L L L 1 1 1 L 1 L L L L 7 L L L L L L 1 1 L 1 1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN 1 30 0 AC/PR S des 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 L 1 1 L L L L b L L 1 5 1 L m 1 b L 1 L la L m L 1 L b b m b 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 m 1 1 1 1 5 1 1. L L b. L L 1 1 m 1 L L L 5a L L 1 1 1 L L 1. L 5 L L L L 1 7 b b L 1 1 L 1 5 7 1 1 1 1. 1 L 1 1 L L L 1 1 1 L L L L m L L L b b. L 1 L L L L I. L 1 L 5 1 L 1 L L L L m to 1 1 b b. as 1e m b 1 L L b 1 1 1 L L 1 I. L 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 L L 1 1 L L b L L 1. L I. L L 1 L L L 1. 1e L L Q L 1 L L 1 1 1 1 - L W L L L L Ui L 1 1 1 1 L L C^O1 5 1 L 7 L' g CO 1 1 L 1. tLJ L L L L gs �6 L b b L L L L 1 L L 1� L L L L L 1 L L 1 L L L h L L m L 1 1 m L 1 1 1 1 b L 5 L L L L L L 1 L L L L L L L L. L L b L 1 L L 1 I. 12 L 7. L 1 L b Is L L L L L -. L b 1.1 L L le L L L L 1 L 1 L L 1 L 1, L 1 L I 1 L 1 L L b. m 5. 11 L 1 L L L L L L 5N F._ g 1 L L 1 L L L co in L Ito Q3 to 1 1 5. L to L L LT bad L L 1 ll7 CO L L L m 5. 1 Zball m 1 L L to 5. L 7 L L L L L 1 L L L 1 1 L L L 5 L L .- L 1 1 L b 1 L L 5 b 1 1 b L L L L L 7. 1 L 1 1 1 In L L L L L L 5 1 L 12 L L 1 1 1 1 L L 1 L 1 1 L L L L b L L L t b 1 h L L L 1 1 L L L la L 1 1 L 1 7. 1 1 L L 1 L b L b L L L L L L 1 L L h L L snare Ln Only unenenee Bale ) MWnwnb 1e urn .0 V. tl Rao. ImWIn Rtl9e] M W„„<mRRm LAM .0043. Reese Mounting Heb1N. seq EOM 22001 noel Seeene 02 cm") nee 9+Psi Rm, R948.D 909 ,aa1. Ramwesee 1r.., ;redo using man ter. r.w.S,wr, AM 0,013 5.0 Cale Rm. I r II no I 0210 RUUD LIGHTING 5- 1JyRry Sic 92O Weeningem venue grew WVNSVmn DW 97 DVS hemmer 502 91D ED R1a++ LeWe W DICK m Nara. wnmrm roe. Lmean S9L..a, wa Re. 07(19e5 Rev VED ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW, MN w 55126 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER MN = Mohagen MH Hansen Architectural Group 5 E Ikeda 2C0fm052/731390 WWmta RN 55391 .molr909199acren I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY RE DR UNDER WY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAYS OF THE SLATE OF MINNESOTA. x TOD0 MOHADD1 MA REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 1HE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEFILED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEW RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL C011110N LAW STANIORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIOH15 INCLUDING COMMIS W THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO DESCRIPTION DAZE 1 Q REVISION 1 102425 • PROJECT NUMBER 0516SORYR OMWN BY RW0 CHEODD BY L NISEN DATE 72005 COMPUTER DIRECTOR! KSJOBAROYAL 0.113 SITE LIGHTING PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N Al2 eD ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUTS PROVIDE SPLASH BLOCKS AT ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS ASPHALT SHNGLES FIBER CEMENT 9DING ALUMINUM FASCIA W/ CUTTERS PAINTED COMM COMPOSITE TRIM CULTURED STONE STONE SILL CULTURED STONE t_L 6 PAINTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM TYP 0 DOORS a WINDOWS S -1 JC FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING A a -L FIR DEPT KEY BD( (TYP 0 EACH DOOR) B01 OF FASCIA 43 110' 10. 1BOT OF FASCIA 43 109' 4" ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUTS _�.•—•w^--_-•^ ••-- •^—� _ i _ L'TIS i PROVIDE SPLASH BLOCKS COMPOSITE TRW TYP 0 WINDOWS r —JJ AT ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS r — Jr ASPHALT SHINGLES ALUMINUM FASCIA W/ GUTTERS PAINTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM PAINTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM FIBER CEMENT SIDING PAINTED E(TERIOR COMPOSITE TRW STONE SILL CULTURED STONE ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUTS -PROVIDE SPLASH BLOCKS Al ALL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS 6 PANTED DOER OR SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING A .L 1/B 1 0 6 PAINTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM TYP 0 DOORS & WINDOWS REAR ELEVATION BUILDING A I•uuiDiii Iiur���iLIilIl�uil E!fl�!!l llli . _L B0T aF FA50A 115' 10 - B0T OF FASCIA 110' 10' CBOT, OF FASOA 43 I 109' 4" 4 TI 6 PAINTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRW TYP 0 WINDOWS 1-� SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING A 1/8 1 0 JI 1/8 = 1 0 EXTERIOR MATERIALS BR I CULTURED STONE I CULTURED STONE CORPORATION WLESHORE RIVER ROCK SCV 2004 METAL 1 PRETINISHED ALUMINUM SOFFIT FASCIA, CURERS TO MATCH ALSCO ALUMINUM DESIGN COLLECDON COLORS 179 ALMOND FIBER CEMENT SIDING JAMES HARDIE PRODUCTS HARDIE PLANK SELECT CEOARMILL OR EQUAL 6 EXPOSURE COLOR TO MATCH OLYMPIC PREMIUM ACRYLIC LATE( STAIN SOLID COLOR BEECHW000 REFER TO MANUF FOR STORAGE & INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS TRIM MRA TEC 5/4 PANTED TREATED EXIER0R COMPOSITE TRIM (0R EQUAL) COLOR 10 MATCH ALSCO ALUMINUM DESIGN COLLECTION COLORS 179 ALMOND (AS I) )SHALT SHINGLES CERTNNTEED INDEPENDENCE 9LWGLE, DRIFTWOOD SS 1 STONE SILLS CULTURED STONE 9LL, COLOR TO BE BUCKSKIN (SW1 1371) CS 1 STONE WALLS CULTURED STONE WALL, COLOR TO BE BUCKSKIN (SWT 1371) PC I PRECAST CONC 9LL5 SHAPES & SIZES PER DRAWINGS COLOR TO MATCH CULTURED STONE BUCKSKIN (SWT 1371) PILASTERS FIBERGLASS COLUMNS PAINTED TO MATCH ALSCO ALUMINUM DESIGN COLLECTION COLORS 179 ALMOND CONTACT DUANE 0 UNIVFNSM PLASTICS 763 424 6882 ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 C R E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER, MN Mohagen WIT Hansen Architectural ALL Group 1 5 E Wayzata er8 Tel 952 731995 Sub 200 Fax 0524731340 Waymm N 55391 o.. aMo9mlmw.wm I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVSION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE S1A1E OF MIINNESOTA. X 109D MONACEN ALA REGASTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHIECT SHALL BE DET11ED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW SIATUIORf AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 A 3 REVISION 1 102405 PROJECT NUMBER 051650RYR DRAWN BY N. SCHNEIDER CHECKED BY I. NISSEN DATE 72005 COMPUTER DIRECTORY ILAIOSVtOYAL OAKS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING A CITY SUBMITTAL A21 T. 31 7 14 8 22 8 4 8 31 7 6 7 16-0 8 4 8 4 4 11 8 6 8 8 8 4 16 0 6 7 LE II r 110 0 MIN 0 AIIN C1 en10 i L iLJ I h II Q = ° of 4 - 1 i �_ :dill 1 - 1 a 1 1!,: ).+ 4 5 • o 7 11 4 5 I ( LJ s a_..... I 5 0 5 0 8 4 7 8 5 8 12 8 4 4 7 8 8 4 5 0 5 0 2 8 10 0 8 16 0 5 4 22 8 5 4 16 0 • 6' 10-0 2-B 98 0 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/8 = 1 0 AJ BUILDING A ` 314 4 8 22 8 4 8 31 4 2 5 4 13 6 8 4 8 2 Ig 5-4 8 10 5 8 8� 8 4 13 6 5 4 4 2 �� 1 1_1 r u/ n' 14-0 L3 0 10-0 9 4 7 8 I I 6 5 4 5 I I I 11 I I 0 6 5 t10 5 4 5 I 0 0 y 1 I. 13 3 I I I 1 rT -'L--- _, I 1 • • pi I �' I m\ �I 0 n � I ( gyp¢ Iv L. wH� J • ' =�"- te 7 8' 10 0 2 8 16 0 5 4 22 8 5 4 16 0 2 e' 10 0 2 -8 96 0 © LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING A 1/8 - 1 0 SHEET NOTES 1 UPPER LEVEL SPACE IS OPNONAL SEE INDMDUAL UNIT PLANS FOR LAYOUTS 2 FINAL RESIROOM AND MECHANICAL ROOM LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY INDMOUAL UNIT LAYOUTS 3 ATTIC ACCESS PANELS SHOWN ONLY FOR RENEW PURPOSES ACTUAL LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED ON INDMDUAL TENNAT PLANS 31 4 9 0 6 8 6 8 9 0 EL) I 19 4 I E0 I Ir1 LJ 4Tr� a iiiflhllooI n- - 9 4 6-8 I 6 8 9 4 32 ff 0 fff UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING A 1/8 I 0 ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW, MN ,u 55126 F. STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER, MN Mohagen WIT - Hansen r. Architectural Group 1 15 E War to 81N Tel 952. 31985 Sub 200 Fm9524731340 W9Ymlo MN 55391 ,mM9Mmsm.mm I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN SPECIF1CARON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERASION, AND THAT 1 AM A DULY UCENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. i R T000 MOH40EI NA REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE 0EDAED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF DEW RESPECTIVE 015TRUME9T15 OF 5E7MCE AND SHALL RETM AIL COMMON LAW STAMORY AND OTHER RESERVE) MGM INCLUDING C0PR4GHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NO DESCRIPTION 041E 1 Q REVBEN 1 102405 PROJECT NUMBER 0516S0RYR DRAWN BY K SCHNEIDER CHECKED BY I N55EN DATE 720.05 COMPUTER DIRECTORY K8JOB5YROYAL OAKS LOWER, MAIN & UPPER FLOOR N & ROOF PLANS BUILDING A CITY SUBMITTAL A2 0 6 PAINTED II DRERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM T1P 0 DOORS & WINDOWS OJ17.3 FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING B 1/8 1 -o ASPHALT SHINGLES FIBER CEMENT SIDING ALUMINUM FASCIA W/ DRIERS PAINTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM CULTURED STONE STONE SILL CULTURED STONE f„ L 6 PANTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM 1YP 0 WINDOWS 02 SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING B �) 1/8 — 1 0 ASPHALT SHINGLE _ ALUMINUM FASCIA s's— _—_ W/ GUTTERS — — PANTED EXTERIOR _ — — COMPOSITE TRIM PANTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TROD FIBER CEMENT SIDING PANTED EIOERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM STONE SRL CULTURED STONE ALUIANUN DOWNSPOUTS PRINIDE SPLASH BLOCKS AT AL DOWNSPOUT LOCATIONS K \does\Roy Oak \ t II 6 PANTED DROWN COMPOSITE TRIM TYP 0 DOORS & WINDOWS A23OREAR ELEVATION BUILDING B 1/8 - 1 -o J 80T. OF FASCIA 110'10 1801 OF FASCIA 109' 4' T 1 6 12 III* IRO ;awn rev sue. /M '111M1110- 41110 -=_® eirT MAIN 041 100' 0' - L B0T OF FASCIA - 110' 10' 43 � B01 OF FASCIA 109 4' 'air® ft _ o �rS119 �r _® I 00 9 3 4 6 PANTED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM 1YP 0 WINDOWS O SIDE ELEVATION 0 BUILDING B EXTERIOR MATERIALS As, c55 +0 C5 1 CULTURED STONE 1 CULTURED STONE CORPORATION 1AKESHORE RNER ROCK SCV 2009 METAL 1 PREF1N15HED ALUMINUM SOFFIT FASCIA. GUTTERS TO MATCH ALSCO ALUMINUM DESIGN COLLECTION COLORS 179 ALMOND FIBER CEMENT SIDING JA ES HARDIE PRODUCTS HARDIE PLANK SELECT CEDARM8L OR EOUAL 6 EXPOSURE COLOR TO MATCH OLYMPIC PREMIUM ACRYLIC LATE( STAIN SOLID COLOR BEECHW00D REFER TO MANUF FOR STORAGE & INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS TRIM MIRA TEC 5/4 PANTED TREATED EXTERIOR COMPOSITE TRIM (0R EQUAL) COLOR TO MATCH ALSCO ALUMINUM DESIGN COLLECTION COLORS 179 ALMOND ASPHALT SHINGLES CERTAINTEED INDEPENDENCE SHANGLE DRIFTWOOD STONE SILLS CULTURED STONE SILL, COLOR TO BE BUCKSKIN (SLUT 1371) STONE WALLS CULTURED STONE WAIL, COLOR TO BE BUCKSIOII (SW1 1371) PC 1 PRECAST CONC SILLS SHAPES & SIZES PER DRAWINGS COLOR TO MATCH CULTURED STONE BUCKSKIN (51Y1 1371) ® PILASTERS FIBERGLASS COWMNS PANTED TO MATCH ALSCO ALUMINUM DESIGN COLLECTION COLORS 179 ALMOND CONTACT DUANE 0 UNNERSAL PLASTICS 763 424 68E12 ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER MN Mohagen Hansen 11.11 _ ArchJteGNra/ Group JILL 1 15 L tyxato SW Tel 952471 955 Site 200 fax 052.4731340 WOYo0S0 10K 55391 ennWcgWv...mm I HEREER CEROFY MAT THIS PUN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY NE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSEO ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF 1HE STATE OF MINNESOTA. X T000 MOHAGEN NA 666/10ATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEFILED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THOR RESPECTIVE 0151RWINT5 OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAN AL COMMON LAW STAMORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NO D600P110N DATE 1 L REVISION 1 _ _ 102415 PROJECT NUMBER 05165ARYR DRAWN Bf IC SCHNEIDER CHECKED BY 1 NISSEN DATE 7.2005 COMPUTER DIRECTORY IC0306SMLOYAL OAKS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING B F. CITY SUBMITTAL AEA23 \ ly 6m tt I\05165 A2 2 DWG 4 8 4 4 32 0 22 8 11 8 6 8 DECK SUPPORTS 4 8 8 4 31 7 31 7 16 0 6 7 ---- `-- 'l REV 0 0 IN Id d --� MII— In o e� r 1 m SIM r 7 11 4 5 w._.i _ I _ I IJ )_ — u TYP �/ L III REV 7 8 8 4 5 0 5-0 5 8 12 8 4 4 5 4 22 8 5 4 16 0 2 8e 100 2 8" 64 Aei OAZZ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING B 1/8 = 1 0 A23 32 0 32 —0 4 8 22 8 4 31 4 e 2 10, 5 4 8 10 58 4 13 6 5 4 4 2 • 4 22 6 5 4 16-0 10-0 2 8 64 OAll LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING B 1/8 .1 0 0 31 4 4427 °UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN BUILDING B /8 - 1 0 SHEET NOTES 1 UPPER LEVEL SPACE IS OPTIONAL, SEE INDMDUAL UNIT PLANS FOR LAYOUTS 2 FINAL RESTROON AND MECHANICAL ROOM LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS RI BE DEIEAMINED ETY INDMDUAL UNIT LAYOUTS 3 ATM ACCESS PANELS SHOWN ONLY FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ACTUAL LOCATIONS TO BE DETOURED ON INDMDUAL TENNAT PUNS ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER MN Mohagen WI Hansen Architectural Group 14 5 C Wayzata Blvd TN 952 73 955 Sul 200 1 952 473 1340 Waymto MN 50391 mohoper nn.en.aem I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. X TODD IMAGER AN REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OMER RESERVED RIGHTS INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Q REVISION 1 102405 PROJECT NUMBER 051650RYR DRAWN 80 K 56)NEIDER CHECKED BY L N65EN o11C 720.05 a COMPUTER DIRECTOR( K4I0BMOYAL OM LOWER, MAIN & UPPER FLOOR & ROOF PLANS BUILDING B CITY SUBMITTAL Ci"k22 TOP OF BRICK • 129' 4• oik TOP OF BRICK • 1213' 0' t 10P122' 0 OF BRICK OCD LEVEL ak SECOND • 112' 0" pi FIRST LEVEL 100'-0. 4110 m /f CID Ins IETAMiamam &F/C _ MOEN ISITa vn. TITr.. i MIMI1 Ta__ ■$o/�if.7m00,7i7 �I P'� 7�YO:gtp1=I :1.31 INIM mmmmm IlLASSIM oremurgelomarnornmsonowmmeamommonase Ark CJ CJ 1.1 CEO ial) 41319 O/Q,5 FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING C 1/8 = 1 0 • TOP OF BRICK 122' 0' oilk FIRST LEVEL • 100' 0• CJ 02 FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING C qLr 1/8 = I 0 plik TOP OF BRICK • 129' 4' of/ATOP OF BRICK 126' 0• alk TOP OF BRICK 122' D' YikSECOND L------'��=�-- • 112' 0• _'�■----;■�� I ice- -_ _ CJ FRST0' L 100' K \JOBS\Roy lOok \ III O�SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING C ,I/8 1 -0 CB Ij CJ CJ PROVIDE SMOOTH BLOCK BEHIND CANOPY N0 SMOOTH BLOCK TO BE EXPOSED 7- CJ CJ PROVIDE SMOOTH BLOCK BEHIND CANOPY N0 SMOOTH BLOCK TO BE EXPOSED 1�) T 2 LOP OF BRICK 122' D• SECOND L V 112' 0' �FlRST L 100' 0• CJ OAyg FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING C 1/B - 1 D CJ EXTERIOR MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS NOT USED NOT USED CB 3 SETTLER0T0NE 2 SEII.ERSIONE CONCRETE BLOCK ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA 1� SETTLFRSTONE 3 SETRFRSTONE CONCRETE BLOCK W/ B SCORE ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA CB .9 CONCRETE SILL I CONCRETE ACCENT SILL. ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA KEYSTONE 1 CONCRETE KEYSTONE BLOCK ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA ® ANCHOR BRICK 1 ANCHOR BRICK ANCHOR BLOCK (HELD COLOR) COLOR NORTH OAKS BLEND AS 2 ROOF 1 ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CERTNNIEED COLOR ROYAL BARK ® METAL 1 PREFINISH0 ALUMINUM SOFFIT FASCIA AND GUTTERS COLOR ORE PREFINISHE0 ALUMNUM DOWNSPOUTS COLOR TO MATCH NORTH OAKS BLEND ® METAL 2. PRETIN@TED METAL FLASHING COLOR HE11L00( GREEN ® METAL 3 PREFINISHEO METAL CANOPY UN4 CLAD KTT'IAR 500 FLUOROCARBON STEEL, COLOR HEMLOCK GREEN ® METAL 4 PAINTED METAL STAIRS COLOR TO MATCH HEMLOCK GREEN ® MEAL 5 PAINTED METAL ACCESS DOOR AND GARAGE DOOR COLOR TO MATCH NORTH OAKS BLEND C--� TRIM 1 FIBER CEMENT TRIM COLOR TO MATCH KASOTA ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER MN Mohagen WI Hansen Architectural Group AIL 1 15 E WynW ®r. Tel 952. 731965 548 200 Fax 9524731340 Wapaln MN 55391 or..rrallagenhcrseesam 1 HEREBY CERTIFY TNAT THIS PEN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPEIMSION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. X TODD MOHAGFN NA REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND 5WJJ. RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS INCLUDING COPYPoGMIS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 RLV610N 1 102405 PROJECT NUMBER 0516S0RYR DAWN FT( K. SCHNEIDER CHECKED BY J. NISSEN DATE 7.20.05 COMPUTER DIRECTOR( K410901ROYAL OAKS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING C CITY SUBMITTAL (i!k 5 1 8 6 8 ). 5 4 B 32 0 4 4 20 -0 5 4 3 4 3 4 8 6 8 5 4 8 8 0 32 -0 6 8 2 8 5 4 6 8 5 4 3 8 3 20 0 5 4 32 0 B, 5 4 e 4 a 6 B 2 8 5 4 f8 FUR OUT & AROUND SPRINKLER PIPING FIELD VERIFY SIZE rr Li GYP TYP I----, el L -1` J@' DN El Li L F—, 1 1 — 1 DN J F ON I -- 1 FIXTURES PARII110N5 DOORS HARDWARE, STARS ETC TO BE PROVIDED & CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE TENANT BUILD OUT SHOWN HERE I FOR INFORMATION ONLY TYP El LJ I 1 I WW TO BELOW CAP TOILET AND CHANIGL ROOMS SPACE W/ 0IS15 0 16 OC 3/4 PLYWOOD DECO !- OPEN TO ON ��WYY _� OPEN TO 8 iii I �WWYY AND 5/8 GYP BD TOP OO 1 MATCH SECOND FLOOR ELEVATION 8 4 /-8 3 4 6 8 2 8 5 4 2 8 5 4 20 0 3 4 8 3 4 5 4 6 8 4 4 a 5 4 6 8 2 8 6 8 O0%4 UPPER FLOOR PLAN BUILDING C 1 /B - 1 -0 96 -0 3 4 5 4 2 8 • • 5 3 8 5 4 3 4 1 20 0 2 8 6 8 32 0 32-0 32 0 8 6 8 8 6 8 20 0 13 4 6 8 ,2 81 6 8 6 8 2 81 { { 14 FUR OUT & GYP AROUND SPRINKLER PIPING FIELD VERIFY SIZE TYP LJ ACCESS PANEL IN CEILING FOR SPRINKLER S0SILM TYP COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION W/ SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR TYP VERIFY SIZE OF REQUIRED SPRINKLER ROOM I L „ —I Bj 2 8 6 8 2 6 6 8 6 B 20 0 02 MAIN FLOOR PLAN BUILDING C nza 1/8 1 0 UP r� LJ 6 8 3 4 2 8' 3 6 8 20 0 2 8 6 8 6 8 L_ _ r-- 6 8 2 8 6 B UP LI 4 L FA UP 2 8' 6 8 8, 6 8 FIXTURES PARTITIONS, DOORS HARDWARE STARS ETC TO BE PROVIDED & CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE TENANT OUT SHOWN -HERE — F0R INFORMATION ONLY TYP N (1 4 6 8 20 0 2 8 6 B SHEET NOTES 1 FINAL RESTROOM AND MECHANICAL ROOM LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY INOMDUAL UNIT LAYOUTS 2 DO NOT POUR FLOOR SLAB UNTIL INTERIOR PLANS ARE FINAJZED ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN w 55126 E STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER, MN Men VT Hansen MI _ Architectural Group 5 E art. Bed 1 952 731985 696 200 Fax9524731310 Wayzata 101 55591 nnArnallagenhaneencorn I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ORS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY - - ME 0R UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERJISION AND THAT I AN A DULY UCFNSE➢ ARCHOECT UNDER THE TAWS 00 THE STATE OF MINNE50TA. X 1000 MONAGEN AA REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AU1H0R5 AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SDMCE MD SHALL RETAN AL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS INCLUDING COPII6GH75 OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 ° REVISION 1 1024.05 PROJECT NUMBER 05165.0RYR DRAWN BY K SC/NEIDER CHECKED BY 1 NISSEN DATE 720.05 COMPUTER DIRECTORY K0JOBAROYAL OAKS MAIN & UPPER FLOOR & ROOF PLANS BUILDING C CITY SUBMITTAL °A24 AT129OP' 4 OF BRICK .TOP126' OF0BRICK CB 4 pik TOP OF BRICK 122' 0" tap Cif SECOND LEVEL 112' 0- pik FIRST L 100' 0" (CB 4 CB 6 � 1 IMF W IYY.111111GIO1•111 wA Ink 1•1111C 'WAC27CCC 7C9S7L7�C� � _ Han—_—rW�m_ rr IMMMUM ! ssI� i—= E . j jw a ! _i�11' -- '11'llllUI--- el, iiiElievosuk• Rine .,or CJ , CJ O�] FRONT ELEVATION BUILDING D I/O - 1 0 AT OP OF BRICK 122'-0" CB 4 C8 5 7\ SECOND L 112 0 diFIRST LE/D. 100' 0" M. �Mt . 4.01E) *ID = 41 ' y� II.II I' l I 1 L4 a1J L 1 11111 1 SEM CJ i . 1 GCB 4 02 SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING D �) 1/8 1-0 CB 4 clk TOP OF BRICK 129' 4" ATOP OF BRICK 126' 0" odk TOP OF BRICK 122' 0" CB 6 SECOND LEVEL112' 0" 611, FIRST L ND•-0" r114 IIII1 I1kA ( 1T J SIGNAGE OA27 REAR ELEVATION BUILDING D 1/B - 1-0 . LPrc T.. r.'I r. J T CJ / CJ CB 4 .TOP OF BRICK 122.-0" oak SECOND L 112' 0" 1FIRST L 100' 0" CO 101R sYOYY RN ]OOO; ui 111112121:10111 1 g H o000a��'t �oo—ea ›.)•& CJ O,� SIDE ELEVATION BUILDING D - 1 0 CJ EXTERIOR MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS NOT USED CB 2 NOT USED 4� SETTLERSTONE 2 SETRERSTONE CONCRETE BLOCK ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KAS01A CB 1 SETTLERSTONE 3 SETITERSIONE CONCRETE BLOCK W/ 8 SCORE ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA CONCRETE SILL 1 CONCRETE ACCENT SILL ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA KEYSTONE 1 CONCRETE KEYSTONE BLOCK, ANCHOR BLOCK INTEGRALLY COLORED (ACCENT COLOR) COLOR KASOTA ANCHOR BRICK 1 ANCHOR BRICK ANCHOR BLACK (FIELD COLOR) COLOR NORTH OAKS BLEND AS 2 ROOF 1 ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES CERIONIIEED COLOR ROYAL BARK ® METAL I PREFINISHED ALUMINUM SOFFIT FASCIA AND GUTTERS COLOR WHITE PREPNI2HE0 ALUMINUM DOWNSPOUTS COLOR TO MATCH NORTH OAKS BLEND METAL 2 PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING COLOR HEMLOCK GREEN ® METAL 3 PREONISHED METAL CANOPY UNA CLAD KYNAR 500 FLUOROCARBON STEELCOLOR HEMLOCK GREEN ® METAL 4 PAINTED METAL STARS COLOR TO MATCH HEMLOCK GREEN ® META 5 PAINTED 9E1AL ACCESS DOOR AND GARAGE DOOR COLOR TO MATCH NORTH OAKS BLEND CID TRIM 1 FIBER CEMENT TRIM COLOR TO MATCH KASOTA ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 C R E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN 55126 E. STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER, MN Mohagen WIT Hansen lill Architectural Group 1 5 C 9oymlo 9.l T 952. 731995 9,66200 fa 9524731340 Wayzata MN 555391 r...molmatamAmn I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THLS PUN SPECIPCOTION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. R TODD MOHAGEN NA REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF MDR RESPECTIVE INSTRWENTS OF 5FR110E AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW 5G111TOR( MD OTHER RESERVED RKH15 DICLUDINO COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 ° REVISION 1 102405 PROJECT NUMBER 05165.12YR DRAWN BY K SCHNDDER CHECKED BY 1 NISSEN DOTE. 720.05 COMPUTER DIRECTORY K0J0951ROYAL OAKS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING D CITY SUBMITTAL (_/6.k27 64 0 32 0 32 0 8 6 8 5 4 `8 8 3 4 5' 20 0 8 5 4 6 8 2 8 5 4 6 8 A2 8, 6 8 3 4 8) 5 4 48), 5 4 48 FUR OUT & GYP AROUND SPRINKLER PIPING FIELD VETBFY SIZE TYP r1 LJ i OPEN TO BELOW DN ON -w 1 IJ r1 LJ OPEN TO BELOW Ti1P TOILET AND ECHANICAL ROOMS SPACE W/ STS 0 16 0 C 3/4 PL D DECK AND 5/8 GYP BD TOP‘TO MATCH SECOND FLOOR ELEVATION Y 4 5 4 3 4 8• 6 8 2 8 20 0 01 UPPER FLOOR PLAN BUILDING D A26 I/O — 1 0 8) 0 64-0 6 8 8 8' 5 4 `8 a 5 4 oc8 6 8 2 6 8 3 4+ 0 32 0 32 0 2 6 8 2' 8 20-0 13 4, 6 8 2 8, 6 8 2 8, 6 8 ,3 4 4 FUR OUT & GYP AROUND SPRINKLER PIPING FIELD VERIFY SIZE. TYP ACCESS PANEL IN CEILING FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM TYP COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION r W/ SPROKLER CONTRACTOR TYP LJ CNI VERIFY SIZE OF j REQUIRED SPRINKLER ROOM 4 2 Er 20 0 MAIN FLOOR PLAN BUILDING D 6 8 81 6 8 13 4 1/8 1 0 SHEET NOTES 1 FINAL RESROOM AND MECHANICAL ROOM LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY NDMDUAL UNR LAYOUTS 2. D0 NOT POUR FLOOR SLAB UNBL INTERIOR PLWS ARE FINALIZED ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW, MN W 55126 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER MN Mohagen VT Hansen Architectural Group 4 5 E a,aab M id 652473 985 520 200 Fax 9524731340 Waymle MN 5539 aMngeNquen.mm I HOIEEY CERTIFY TNAT THIS PUN SPECIFIG80N OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY - - ME 0R UNDER MY DIRECT SIPERASION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA X TODD MOHAOEN A91 REGISTRATION NUMBER 18074 THE N4CIRTECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE 015TRUMENTS OF SERVICE MD SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON L4W STATUTOR( AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS. INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF TIME ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Q REVMON 1 102485 PROJECT NUMBER 051650RYR DRAWN BY K SCHNEIDER CHECKED BY I N65EN 9. DATE 7.20.05 COMPUTER DIRECTORY r24500SVIOYAL 0A16 RMAIN& UPPER FLOOR l' & ROOF PLANS BUILDING D CITY SUBMITTAL A A2 6 20 8 ENLARGED PLAN 0 TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/4 1 -0 NOTE VERIFY PUN W/ SANITATION COURIER PRIOR TO COAST SITE SIGN 1/4 1 0 2-0 SI3 SIGN AREA 00 1 10 11 0 Suitt 12345 6 DIAL PAINTED BOLLARD 12 ANCHOR BRICK W/ HORIZONTAL ROW ALTERNATE COURSES WALLS TO MATCH ADJACENT BUILDINGS PROVIDE 6 THK. REINF CONC SLAB OVER 4 COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL SLOPE CONCRETE PAD TO FROM 1/8 PER FT 3/4 DIAL BY 1 1/2 DEEP RECF54S FOR GATE CANE B0115 PROMO( TWO EACH AT GATE IN CLOSED AND OPEN POS6ON FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION 8 DIA STEEL POST PAINTED 6 DI PIPE PAINTED BOLLARD CONCRETE FILLED SEE DETAIL 10/A1.3 BRONZE FRAME BY SIGN VENDOR 1 6 HIGH LIMNS BY SIGNAGE VENDOR INTERNALLY UT BOX SIGN BY SIGN VENDOR PRECAST CAP TO MATCH AQNCENT BUILDINGS BY CONTRACTOR 12 ANCHOR BRICK BASE TO MATCH ADJACENT BUILDINGS BY CONTRACTOR �1 _LL LLJ1 11_111� TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION 1/4 - 1 0 BRONZE FRAME BY SIGN SUPPUER 12 ANCHOR BRICK TO MATCH ADJACENT BUILDINGS 22 0 X 6 -0 CONC FTG REINF W/ 15 BARS 016 0C G WAY SITE SIGN & SECTION 1/4 = 1 -0 ©TYP UNIT SIGN / LIGHT DETAIL 1 1/2 = 1 0 SIGNAGE 12 18 1/8 ALUM SIGN W/ WHITE LETTERS ON BLUE BACKGROUND REFLECTIVE SHEETING TO READ 'HANDICAP PARKING ONLY ADDITIONAL 12 6 1/8 SIGN TO READ $200 00 FINE' ADDITIONAL 12 6 1/8 SIGN TO READ "VAN PARKING SEE SITE PLAN FOR VAR PARKING STALL LOCATIONS 5 SIDED SIGN POST OR 1 1/2 DIAL GALA POST DRIVE 5 SIDED POST INTO GROUND 0R SET PIPE PO IN CONC BASE 1 SIGNS 10 BE A MINIMUM OF 12 18 1/8 2 RED LETTERING ON WHITE FIELD 3 3M OR EQUAL ENGINEERS GRADE REFPECTIVE SHEETING ON ALUMINUM 4 WORDING SHALL BE N0 PARKING FIRE LANE 5 SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED AT Ei6L31 END OF THE FIRE LANE AND AT LEAST AT EVERY 75 FOOT INTERVAL ALONG THE FIRE LANE 6 ALL SIGNS SHALL BE DOUBLE SIDED FACING THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL (PERPENDICULAR W/ CURB) 7 POST SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 12 BUT NOT MORE THAN 36 FROM THE CURB B FIE LANE SHAH BE REQUIRED DR FRONT OF FIRE DEPARTMENT 12 TO 36 CONNECTIONS EXTENDING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE AND ALONG ALL AREAS DESIGNATED BY THE FIRE CHIEF ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING/FIRE LANE SIGNAGE PROVDE PTD WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL AT EACH DESIGNATED HANDICAP PARKING STALL CENTER SYMBOL IN STALL. ALL LINES TO BE 5 WIDE ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL 1/4 1 -0 6 DIA PAINTED lc' STEEL POST FILLED W/ CONC ROUND TOP 1/4 1 0 E!!!!!!! !!!!!! E IE !!!!!!•U!!'!!!E III"�1 ��1111�]�_ .ion. �� &l U E��C�I •II L�R�/ RECEMNG SLEEVE FOR 1/4 BOLT W/ 5/16 INSIDE OWA 3 LONG (GALA) I/4 DIAL BARREL BOLT 7 LONG SET IN SLEEVE W/ 5/16 INSIDE DIAL 3 LONG (GALA ) PREF1N METAL FLASHING 12 ANCHOR BRICK WADS MATCH ADJACENT BUILDINGS 1X6 CLEAR CEDAR SLATS (N0 KNOTS) 0 6 0 C OVER 2X4 STEEL ANGLES -UMBER TO BE STAINED IS 2X2X1/4 (PAINT) CONCRETE FOOTINGS FOR 6 AND B STEEL PIPES C1/2 OWd BY 3 0 CANE BOLT (GALA) 3/4 DNA STD PIPE SLEEVE 2 004 X 1 0"D CONC FIG RBNF W/ 2 CONE 15 TARS BRONZE FRAME BY SIGN SUPPLIER INTERNALLY LT BOX SIGN BY SIGN SUPPLER PRECAST CONC CAP PROVIDE CONE FLASHING & WEEP HOLES 024 0C UNDER PRECAST CAP DOWEL CAP INTO MASONRY 12 ANCHOR BRICK W/ RIGID WIRE WALL TIES ALTERNATE COURSES PROVIDE 2 AIRSPACE BETWEEN BLOCK & CONC. BARN UP PROWDE COAT FLASHING & WEEP HOLES 024 0 C ABOVE GRADE GROUT AIRSPACE 5000 BELOW GRADE BITUMINOUS PAWN EARTH 0R CONC (SEE SITE PLAN) GRANULAR FILL 1 0 DIAL POURED CONC FOOTING 15 6 ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 CR. E WEST SUITE 150 SHOREVIEW MN i 55126 _= STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES STILLWATER MN Mohagen Hansen til - Architectural Group 5 C 6AYAab ®M Tel 851471 915 9.6 200 Fm651477.1340 Ma MN +Mnpn+wmmn I EETEB/ CEROFY THAT TANS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR READILY WAS PREPARED BY BE 0R UNDER E% DIRECT SUPETMSION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCH1ECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA X 1ODD MOHAGO4 ALA REGISTRATION NUMBER. 18074 THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSERUMENIS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STAIUIORf AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUIEENIS NO DESCRIPTION DATE 1 Q REVISION 1 1024.05 PROJECT NUIL000 051650RYR DRAWN BY K. SCHN0DER CHECKED BY L N5SEN DAZE 7.20.05 COMPUTER DIRECTORY EEV0851ROYAL OAKS SITE DETAILS E CITY SUBMITTAL A13 STILLWATER TOWN OFFICES SIGHT LINES City of Stillwater Minnesota r SECTION A -A 920 970' 900 890 880 870 8601 840 I -f I -I I I f) 1 -�+20 -3+00 -2+80 -2+60 -2+40 SECTION B-B 920 91011 900 8901 880 I 870 860 r 850 840 62 -2+20 -2+00 -1+80 -1+60 1 f _1 - - - -- I - -- '- -- I - L - - 1 - -1+40 -1+20 -1+00 -0+80 -0+60 -0+40 -0+20 0+00 312 L -3+20 -3+00 -2+80 -2+60 -2+40 -2+20 -2+00 -1+80 -1+60 -1+40 -1+20 -1+00 -0+80 -0+60 GRAPHIC SCALE 9,1 / ( IN FEET ) 1 In 20 EL AERIAL PHOTO SCALE 1 = 200 —I GeS I I 920 S\O�'SNC:0 G�- of I I - _ I _ 910 I 900 890 t— - - t -I- -- -- -E - I - r r 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 a I ' I I I ' 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 880 2+40 2+60 2+80 920 910 900 890 880 870 860 850 840 DESIGNED 9r DRAWN BY CAU CNECI(ED BY CWP PPG/EC! 0- 04875 641E REM. 1 h by rbly th 1 Mrs pi p p red by m der 511E PLANNING ENGINEERING A0CY81ECE my d act peroc d N l l m d Iy L. ed P1c/essronol E 9 it r d '° I we o5 Eh St t ' t PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC GROUP E ��'Ly/ 9180 LEXINCTON AVENUE NE. 1415 E Wyz 1 Blvd 5 1 200 Chad W Pb pRIXE PING MN 55014-J825 Wyzot MN 55391 DATE 10/25/05 LICENSE / 18277 PIANE (/87) drier Phm. (950 7.952) 7E- .5- 0 FAX 5) 788-8007 PREPARED FOR ROYAL OAKS REALTY 1000 C ty RodEW t Sh rem w MN 55126 FNoNe (851) 49.5-55 9 MiE 10/f0/05 �Dl PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/05-45 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 1749 South Greeley Street Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Industrial Zoning District BP -I Applicants Name Royal Oaks Realty Project Description Preliminary plat approval for 20 lot subdivision (19 condominium office Tots and common area) Discussion The request is to subdivide a 5 14 acre site into 20 lots, 19 office condominium Tots and a common area This item was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at your meeting of August 8, 2005 and continued for completion of the application submittal (tree survey) and modification of plans to accommodate impervious surface requirements The previous submittal had 22 office lots including the existing office structure The current proposal has 19 lots including the existing office structure Project Review The subdivision request (SUB/05-45) is related to the Certificate of Compliance and variance (CC/V/05-50) The preliminary plat shows a townhouse office site plan with coordinated access parking landscaped areas Along with the site plan utility/drainage and grading plans have been submitted and reviewed by the Engineer Department (memo attached) Of particular concern is for the drainage from the rear of buildings 1-6 With the reduced setback (35 feet rather than 75 feet) it will be difficult to manage rear roof runoff This condition has resulted in erosion problems in other similar areas in the City A condition of approval is recommended to adequately address this engineering concern Access to the site is off of CR 66, Greeley, requires review by Washington County Major access to the site is at the Curve Crest/Greeley intersection that may require some modification to the driveway design to align with the intersection and stop Tight This will be the responsibility of the developer Commercial subdivisions require park dedications An in lieu fee will be collected before final platting To protect trees and the site before grading a preconstruction site meeting is required and early installation of silt and tree protection fencing Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 Buildings 1-6 shall be setback 60 feet from rear property boundary to accommodate rear building roof drainage or an alternative to control drainage provided as approved by the City Engineer 2 All utility and drainage easements as required by the Engineering Department shall be provided 3 Modification to the intersection of CR 66 and Curve Crest Blvd shall be provided as required by Washington County 4 Silt fence and protective tree fencing shall be installed before a site preconstruction meeting with representatives from the Engineering and Planning Departments 5 The common area association documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney to protect City interests 6 A park dedication fee of $38,000 shall be paid before plat recording 7 Comments from Washington County shall be incorporated into final development plans Findings The project as conditioned is consistent with the City zoning and comprehensive plan Attachments Application and plans City - State - Zip Telephone No Signatu PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No 60 Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdiwsion —Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * )K. Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal (, e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the apphcation process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project ill E11 GKEv--'7TK JT Assessors Parcel No 33-030-7L'3Z ZA it ubl ¥000 S RR T (GEO Code) 1 Zoning Distract IJP .i. Description of Project Otle. I✓11511 d G Dr -ALE J3UiL4 I(}(0 Atio Z.I hl!✓W ToWt,1 FFtc-g.S 1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct l further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used Property Owner C)(�RM Prier iI%5 &1c F Mailing Address Po BUX 6Ti LLW ,1I 9Soe Z. (o5/-711-1--d/(3 (Signature is Lot Size (dimensions)41�- x 31 Land Area Ss I `i At Height of Buildings Stories Principal �EE Accessory Representative PI (t-E' L3LM1t.4, , I`OyPL O L7V5 t, Mailing Address 1000 r R E ' Ol7g /50 City - State - Zip %litT% I EV'I L 1t `] 5i Z(v Telephone No ('f Signature I L— V uired) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION D (Irre.ykr sluice.) Total Building floor area ILO isquare feet /J Existing 3,5'60 square feet Proposed (03 ((ZD square feet Paved Im pervious A/ea )Ilo,3a5 square feet No of off-street parking spaces 2.7-8 Feet PL 5 VI.) (13 Ulric Lv\,,xi1/4,--e.,0.- Lv1 XL' ✓ I r r y �1 1$ �To • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/05-70 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 1221 North Broadway Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name George Middleton Type of Application Subdivision Project Description A minor subdivision of Lots 35 — 38, Block 7, Carli and Schulenburg's Addition Discussion The proposal is to resubdivide lots 35 — 38 Block 7 of Carli and Schulenburg's Addition to create lots consistent with the RB Zoning District standards The minimum lot size in the RB district is 7,500 square feet (50 feet by 100 feet) Each of the parcels contains a platted lot along with some portion of a platted lot to the east of it For example, Parcel A is the existing Lot 38, with a portion of Lot 4 being added to it Parcel B is the existing Lot 37, with a portion of Lot 5 added to it (see attached map) There is an existing home on Parcel D that encompasses a portion of Lot 6, and is larger than the rest of the parcels There are slopes greater than 18 % on the east side (rear side) of the parcel, these slopes were not calculated into the square footage of buildable area All of the minimum zoning requirements have been met for this zoning district This includes the lot area, lot width and depth, and all required setbacks from front, side, rear and bluff lines The driveway serving the existing home on Parcel D will be relocated as shown on the attached map This driveway will not exceed the maximum 12% grade required in the ordinance Individual sewer and water services to each of the parcels were installed last year with the North Hill improvements Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The applicant must present proof of paid Assessments and paid Deferred Hook Up charges to the Community Development Director and Finance Department before the subdivision is recorded Findings Proposed subdivision is consistent with zoning requirements for the RB District Attachments Application Form/Letter from the Applicant/Site Survey • I PLANNING ADMINISTRj 1 ION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No 6..►U Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No OD ACTION REQUESTED Mc Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and eng►neering fees The fees for requested action are attached to this apphcation The appl►cant ►s responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required /f application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits 03od-�`1/oao.3 Address of Project 1 5O) Lin -I 57- Assessor's Parcel No 21036201 36o34 /; a/ N 5,Eo/1� P)PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Zoning District R5 Description of Project ' w si N (GEO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner GEc2G-E r, M(ppLErv,v Mailing Address 1901 N rW ST City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature trIlf II u e i required) Lot Size (dimensi Land Area Height of Buildings Principal Accessory STLL.waT A,(N 657- 704- too SsO82 Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Stories Feet Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM April 20 2005 P 320s8 1b A 8 or. DP" Cr ar IP v? 2A s 1- LL cc 0 z B � 3 ADDITION 2 OK 5C STREET G• 23 z <EPPtY 2- 20 LL 2- 0 z AVENUE T�xt> ®. 8 ADDITION r' 1G 1 .?. VENUE Cr r STREET 23044 w srm CA D A5 E S tPE DOC 555450 Location Map if" BROADWAY z n z9. arw E ST® 42 ext> AR OF 0,4Am. a® A LAKE ST MN DNR I PROTECTED W LAKE ST C MINN ON DN FW 70 PROTECTED W TE 8 111nw OU AR5 RERS zwat TSON 1110. T28N R7N R_W R2IW R2OW Vicinity Map 239 Scale in Feet rawno no an m. .am m pa Non WbNn on Canty alpcw 'a nMnp MI bmod .rem.* w oNT Wwinplm Cow., N nwen crony Inaccuracies eI Waal. opp Ca.. Maw,. rlica n arc Puma a Area Homan wlm may. Se .nb 00 m! minima Np..ne.r 200 Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. , LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING Middleton Minor Subdivision Narrative September 22, 2005 The proposal is to add property to some existmg platted lots m Block 7 of CARLI AND SCHULENBURG'S ADDITION, to bnng them into compliance with existing city standards for buildable lots The property lees within the RB Two Family Zoning District No change of the zoning is required or requested Each of the parcels contains a platted lot along with some portion of a platted lot to the east of it For example, Parcel A is the existing Lot 38, with a portion of Lot 4 being added to it Parcel B is the existing Lot 37, with a portion of Lot 5 being added to it Parcel C is the existing Lot 36, with a portion of Lot 6 being added to it There is an existing home on Parcel D that encompasses a portion of 6 different lots, and is quite a bit larger than the rest of the parcels The City of Stillwater has installed individual sewer and water services to each of these parcels already in the past The assessments for these services have already been paid by the property owner As demonstrated on the attached Certificate of Survey, Minor Subdivision map, all of the minimum requirements for lots m this zoning district have been satisfied This includes the lot area, lot width and depth, and all required setbacks from front, side, rear and bluff lines The existing dnveway serving the existmg home on Parcel D will be relocated as shown on the map This existing driveway will not exceed the maxunum 12% grade required in the ordinance This request is considered a Minor Subdivision, even though several parcels are shown all on one map because there are less than the required amount of parcels being created from each existing tax parcel, of which there are several included in the request 5620 Memorial Avenue North Stillwater MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439 8833 • Fax (651) 430 9331 • Website www Re inc tom aruce A Pol;1S 1939 2001 Timothy I Freeman, LS Todd A Enckwn PE President Vice Resident if PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SV/05-71 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location A portion of unimproved Holcombe Street abutting Lot 5, Blk 9 Thomas, Parker and Mower's Second Addition Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name James and Diane Kleinke and Ande and Muriel Hassis Type of Application Street Vacation Project Description A street vacation of the west twenty (20) foot portion of unimproved Holcombe Street abutting Lot 5, Block 9 Thomas Parker and Mower's Second Addition Discussion The request is to vacate a portion of Holcombe Street as shown on the attached survey The request has been reviewed by the public works department They have concerns for loss of public access to possible future lots Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 All lots owned by James and Diana Kleinke shall be combined into one parcel before recording the parcels Attachments Letter from Applicant's Attorney/Petition/Map 09/01/2005 10 43 FAX 6517651982 UL MPLS LES IJUUL I THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA • Fee 250 Receipt No. / )-/ City of Stillwater PETITION TO VACATE PUBLIC STREET The Undersigned Hereby Petition That All That Portion of LA r1 1 ►%T C R O V e d ABUTTING LOTS P4 A1(ept, "e Mewero Second vacated NAME f ~lasso o) cornve 5tr{eet (c.)& , Block / o 744)7s0 J Jeghnle 5tr) Addition, in the city of Stillwater, hereby be ttac Pets l o e J )24 5 J]o I c, Ain. 1 e 5try e e f aKa ADDRESS I/ G ti 5 tReer 5 fi Ilwct tee? iyr1V 5g°�2 I ZZ 5 001 c-0 rnloe Gi-- !►to S $t3C+„ S ShIlwaie( "rJ et �t L S t rc.� Sfo 2-01 (6 °1- - c 11wz .,/ I'll Li `` \ \\) � •I nt /deft tl0P7e/7 is . S-tRep-{ �el o f Pert lfione4 1A R S 5 1a a e. -1 a maps owing the Beet to be vacated S \Planning\street vacation application petition wpd CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651 430-8800 I PETITION OF JAMES KLEINKE AND DIANE KLEINKE (HUSBAND AND WIFE) AND ANDE HASSIS AND MURIEL HASSIS (HUSBAND AND WIFE) FOR THE VACATION OF A CERTAIN UNOPENED UNIMPROVED STREET To The City Council Of City Of Stillwater, Washington County, State Of Minnesota The Petitioners, JAMES A KLEINKE and DIANE L KLEINKE (husband and wife), (hereinafter referred to, collectively, as `Petitioner") with ANDE and MURIEL HASSIS (husband and wife), (hereinafter referred to, collectively, as "Joint Petitioner") state and represent 1 Petitioner and Joint Petitioner hereby request vacation of that certain unopened ununproved public street in the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, known as Holcombe Street (a k a Jeannie Street), as shown on the attachment which is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A" and descnbed as follows The West Twenty (20) feet of that part of unimproved Holcombe Street lying South of the North line of Lot Five (5), Block Nine (9) of Thomas, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota extended Eastward to the West line of the East Ten (10) feet of that unimproved Holcombe Street and lying North of the South line of the North Ten (10) feet of Lot Seven (7), Block Nme (9) of Thomas, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota extended eastward to the West tine of the East Ten (10) feet of that unimproved Holcombe Street (hereinafter called the "Subject Street") 2 The Petitioner and the Joint Petitioner own the land abutting the Subject Street 3 The said portion of the Subject Street is platted to the land owned by the Petitioner as shown by the County Auditors Plat attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "B" 4 The Petitioner is the underlying owner of the said portion of the Subject Street 5 That on May 1, 1990 the City of Stillwater vacated a parcel of land which is legally descnbed as follow, to -wit The East Ten (10) feet of that part of unimproved Holcombe Street lying South of the North line of Lot Five (5), Block Nine (9) of Thompson, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater extended Eastward to the East line of Holcombe Street and lying North of the South line of Lot Seven (7), Block Nine (9) of Thompson, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater extended Eastward to the East line of Holcombe Street That the resolution vacating said part of Holcombe Street was recorded in the office of said County Recorder on June 15, 1990 as Document No 633503 6 Resolution No 8280 pertaining to the above vacation states "Whereas, at the meeting duly called for that purpose, the City Council did on the 15` day of May, 1990, determine that the proposed vacation would not interfere with or defeat the public interest or adversely affect the public, and that it would be m the best mterest of the City of Stillwater that a portion of the street be returned to the tax roles " 7 Whereas, based on the same conclusion, the Petitioner and Joint Petitioner have presented this petition asking for vacation of a portion of Holcombe Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota 8 As to provide notification and clarification, any portion of unimproved Holcombe Street lying South of the South line of Lot Five (5), Block Nine (9) of Thompson, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater should not be vacated The unimproved Holcombe Street lying adjacent to Lot Seven (7) and Lot Nine (9) of Thompson, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater needs to remain a nght- of-way as the Petitioner needs and requires access to their property located at Lot Five (5), Block (9) of Thompson, Parker and Mower's Second Addition to Stillwater Furthermore, the certain tract of the unimproved Holcombe Street located adjacent to Lot Seven (7) and Lot Nine (9) noted above needs to be maintained (snow plowed) by the City to allow the owners of Lot Seven (7) and Lot Nine (9) access to their property dunng the winter months Petitioner /4L / James Klemke Date %D - /F - O3 Petitioner 0Diane Klemke Date /O-/5'DS i Joint Petrtio, � J,, _ / • Hassis Date _ j4 �G( Joint Petihar�%i unel Hassis Date f -(4 D5' / 5 JO25 - e -7c7c, I'nod' °'d e1-t ttone$2 'Xlei )(e- /'? 2 / - 5) 3O - gIein Ke 7 /I221 - 52O' " 5114°Y� ` IQ' ^ (Pohl'�''v`` / 2 ,J / /�J oc bee ))4 15 v 26) 0 0 I // 58 � . 29 50� e fly IJ !� r 3o1M t 'et'f, vrle a i ItICt STREET N . 7 • Jaw. e WE, e v 11 R 1s, 1) r j R y � n J a 1 a R) R a A e R. 41 a e.• ice^ % Fla WEBSTERS ADDITION • II TO STTT T WATER 2 -- n •— I r1 \ND'8c`11l L17_11VI ACRE "'In )1 0.4 e n 2 e .S L.. W R.I W P.M% VlcInly Mep 0 178 Scale In Feel r w.v .. .e . �. n. .�iau - iv\ i11 I1�1„ Ii Irt,1-1,4, 1�ICu�Cc`, 'G ► . WVuilforspl -m 7 _ ?-rtAdd1 6r -to -rpm T ie' PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/05-72 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 402 South Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Steve Bremer Type of Application Subdivision Project Description A minor subdivision of Lot 3, Block 1 Joseph Wolf Brewery Addition into one lot of 1,200 square feet Discussion The applicant is requesting a minor subdivision of the Joseph Wolf Brewery Addition The property to be subdivided is part of the first floor on the northeast corner of the Joseph Wolf Brewery Building with the address 402 Main Street South The site is approximately 30 feet by 40 feet Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The request shall meet all Building Code Requirements Findings Attachments Application Form/Letter from the Applicant/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings ivov c< <uuo I Lsrm e per Lonstruction Inc No 4743 P 2 402 Main Street, LLC 215 Wabasha Street South Saint Paoli, MN 55107 November 22, 2005 Community Dcvclonmcnt Dcnartmcnt City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 To whom it may cum= 402 Main Street LLC submits for review and approval, the subdivision of Joseph Wolf Brewery Addition, Lot-003 Block-001 for the purpose of sale This property is located on the North -Fast Comer of the Joseph Wolf Brewery Building with an address being 402 Main Street South, Suite 1, Stillwater, MN, 55082 As per the enclosed drawing, the size of this space is approximately 30 feet wide by approximately 40 feet deep Rt,spcctfully submitted Stephen C Bremer Chief Manager • Ph 651-430-3494 • Fax 651-430-3529 • PLANNING ADMINISTL,TION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Casello 606 Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No i MitEr ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Xl Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs_ of attorney and engineering fees _ The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (► e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project go? .5 z'S.A4ZI.Assessor's Parcel No ago W0/3A p (GEO Code) Zoning District D Description of Project S ct b - cf1 c, -r-r s 5 "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply wit/ the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner 4(O 2 t'-'- Representative -� Mailing Address 2-/S- 5eux/YX". WQ%R,,c, -- Mailing Address City - State - Zip Sr Pa.4„�f-�.�. V (0 7 City - State - Zip Telephone No GL S( - -ZZ y - (i; ! r/ Telephone No Signature (S gnature is required) r )Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) _ x Total Building floor area square feet Land Area Existing square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed square feet Principal Paved Impervious Area square feet Accessory No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\shella\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 WES LINE OF CITY EVES DESC BK46 DEEDS PG R.IW R2OW ROW D2N TJ IN THIN T29N T2SN T27N R2 W R21W R2OW Vicinity Map Scale in Feet -res. M .. aan a na as WPM wa▪ % Tabu. WaNgCooly m Cfy dlb. TM «`a a ormanrc. w nip m i W PCom Powwow t. wary Mammies 6pom. Wa.Mryan co 6mv.ph 6a P. I 1 t-ae a ma m Ae.ro n( nman • Me ph B.Mmnn. 30 U06 .dap pM.¢ harm. 22 NO t r p • �4 rta a V Cr THE BREMERS Stillwater Minnesota P 651 430 3494 F 651 430 3529 Developer Contractor r A J Joseph Wolf Restoration Stillwater Minnesota WCL ASSOCIATES INC 952 541 9969 Architecture Inte tors Joseph Wolf Restoration RENOVATION DESCRIPTION n 0 AREA RETAIL 1 200 SF RESTAURANT 6100SF GRUMPY STEVE S COFFEE 1 200 SF CAVES AND RELATED SPACES 6 000 SF NELSON STREET RESIDENTIAL 1 414 SF FIRST FLOOR TOTAL AREA 15 914 SF The Bremers Stillwater, MN 651-224-8319 Developer .1",,J BREMER CONSTRUCTION, INC Ph 651-224-8319 Fax 651-224-0059 6,5140 OFFICIAL PLAT JOSEPH WOLF BREWERY ADDITION o L 7 T !It I 111 a Ft t 1t 74, nrn ai - .en d TT 2T SwIlmer ..� non N7▪ 2 25 48 E 300 00 3 6 ti4 9¢ /6 ea fuo- Yr Y 7 -t 96 cml al 24. Ice }4T .72 wN 5 10T 1 ealMa, Cr. ta A. n1 IA T BLOCK 1M if Je l y N72 26 13 E , 300 00 6 8 Tm e 3 For lh p rp I t. Ut w wl Bock 29 Orl9l e T on 0 y 15t1 wo w h awn d l beer N 17' 734 02 0wroln /2 eh IB Ph Iran pip N9 pi p 9 lampea L S 30 t with year 1 naweary h p On /2 cF ben Oa lam 91 t caner witthout ern n Nunn ar ma ea with hl 9 .w 8 a 8 z N72 1228 E 1819 X7 L F' i N51 10 23 W 3- 13.34 b a ti ��6a1 x \ L �'1w` 1 g10 nrua: , x E ¢ ss nw r t a ',my: t 2 t 1 ri, alJ 13 R8 V !, V?' 1 10 9A ern f :ram/ an •� 1 / / / / 4 LOT e. w trarn. Iwor.ly O.N ter O. lb n. OT 11 0 ^T 1 warp n� m a�inau� i —21353 N72 1228 E N1 IZ y I U InPEHEQ I 1 0T 14 VICINITY MAP SEC 28 TWP 30 8NG 2D NOTE TD lT 0 *Own M won e Wen demand u.camn 3 9077am 93892 will .pen lh wing Nl pl1 - -- Deno, e. eomb.e .ae Dow N 3177509 & 3257 52 — — D In Il 9 w.wn Iti • SCALE IN FEET 2O 0 20 o 5w 20 ee John Oltver & Assoc%ates 11 i f3 I 1 I'1 t 4 Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director P---- Date December 8, 2005 Subject Comprehensive Plan Amendment (minor) Case No CPA/05-01 Background When the Comprehensive Plan was amended in 1996, areas outside of the Phase I, II or III expansion area were designated Rural Residential because the land owner did not have plans for development and the site was in the Phase IV, 2015 expansion area Analysis Because of the proximity of this site to the Liberty Project, the site was "master planned" as a part of the Liberty Planned Unit Development Streets and utilities were extended to the site anticipating future development The current Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the site is Rural Residential consistent with being in Stillwater Township It was anticipated when the land was annexed to the City, the land would be designated as urban residential consistent with the surrounding land use The site is surrounded by the Liberty Development To the north is townhouse development and to the east is single family development The requested small lot single family designation is consistent with the adjacent Liberty Master Plan PUD Recommendation Amend Comprehensive Plan land use map to redesignate the 8 acre Liberty West site to small lot single family (City) from existing Rural Residential (Township) Attachment Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map C/4/o r— a f Location Map 7245 7 35 75 7;15 ��rs Tlrlti 14iW ]1e5 1)44100441/ Cm;t44--- LIBERTY KINSHI GREEN OMEST •D360 GREEN 3645, 1 36 36651_ 13625 � I 594 21 oI co A;b \ A " l 0/1 �11 �, 0 1 I 1 rl —1 tt M'I �I MI M N o M M • 325 / 34 ARM HIL GREEN LIBERTY AVENUE c0) , r�h�pt��iT'9C 3415 614 B2O R21 W R20W R29W T12N T3IN T30N T29N TUN T27N R22W R21W R20W Vicinity Map 4+_ 0 300 Scale in Feet amwa an • .m weft ewer weenft n ovly ekes 71w mere 0 i0e be ea rnr0 Woos W5>tsdon nu" loo,a0Ie r50neeare Savae w e1mOT CabH &Novae fr. O 0,0 0 (05 1 30457 rw ae MMa,A5e00 Imraem, osre maw 0der1 2005 beaalr050 0ecen0er0 200 Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date December 8, 2005 Subject Zoning Amendment for 8 0 Acres of Land Located at 7135-7143 Manning Avenue from Agricultural Preservation to Cottage Residential Case No ZAM/05-01 Background The site requesting rezoning is located next to Liberty Development During Liberty development, two streets were extended to the property boundary contemplating eventual development of this site (Liberty West) The proposed Cottage Residential zoning is the same as the single family zoning of the development to the east of the site The Agricultural Preservation designation is the initial designation of all lands annexed to the City Findings The zoning designation is consistent with surrounding Liberty Planning Unit Development and will help to preserve heritage trees located on the site and buffer the development from CR 15 expansion Recommendation Recommend to City Council for rezoning site from Agricultural Preservation, AP, to Cottage Residential, CR Attachment Zoning map amendment request v J 7671 • I, y J • 12092 /N7N` Location Map • • • 12323 12115 12363 124!4 12377 • f -- I (r' • ? 12360 • I 12490 • cSAr 12 • 7i41 STaee 024r) 4 ' "I / ! d I✓ ✓ N I• ,1253 I. • • • 75 35T5 125 31*71 a • • 12525 7155 715i -^• • 715( nnw R31w mow Vicinity Map 0 603 Scale in Feet anew on Ana y� m neon. vWCU4bWnym, Lay es �� � dlerence y Panoses a• wnn ym uvy no iesWm M recwn Sir W mnyon a 9rvryor Omc Fmn f65) 508 on Inn. on IamNm M moo,. 1 dr o led am.' MOS ZONING § 31 1 7 Detached accessory structures to cated on corner lots shall have the garage doors turned away from the side street 8 If there are two garages on site a minimum of one garage shall not face the street or streets if a coi ner lot (4) Development regulations Area setback, and height i egulations Provision Single Family 1 Maximum building height Main building/accessory dwelling Garages accessory building 2 Average lot area (for PUD phase) 3 Muumum lot width 4 Minimum lot depth 5 Minimum front yard requirements Front yard —House 20 feet Front yard —Garage (front facing)1 27 feet Front yard —Garage (side facing) 20 feet 6 Side yard Interior House Garage Corner House 15 feet Garage 20 feet 7 Rear yard House Garage 8 Fi ontage Requirement2 9 Maximum garage area 2'/s stories and 35 feet 1 story and 20 feet 10 000 square feet 65 feet NA 10 feet 5 feet 3 feet if in rear yard 25 feet 3 feet 35 feet 1 000 square feet 'Seventy five percent of front facing garages must have the garage setback at least six feet from the front wall or porch line of house House and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for vai iety of garage types and locations (front loaded side loaded and recessed) and fi ont and extenor side house elevations 2Where two or more adjacent lots do not meet street fiontage requirements the driveways must be combined (5) Design review Design review is required for accessory dwelling units or duplex developments subject to traditional devel opment design standards (Ord No 854, § 3 2 17 98 Old No 876, § 1 6 1 99, Ord No 892, § 1 4 18 00) Supp No 13 CD31 15 S . d 11 3 CR" cottage 1 esidential district (1 ted buildin_ s ane cot ta: . .Rowing build ings and uses and their accessory build ings and uses are permitted a Dwelling houses each occupied by not moi e than one family and a garage no larger than two stalls wide § 31 1 STILI WA PER ( ODE b Parks, playgrounds and other open space areas c Two family residences on corner lots (2) Permitted uses with special use permits In a cottage residential district the fol lowing buildings and uses are permitted by special use permit a Home occupations subject to all pro visions of the zoning ordinance reg ulatmg home occupation (4) Development regulations Provision (3) Accessory uses No more than two acces sory buildings one private garage and one accessory building 90 square feet max 'mum may be located in a residential pi emises Area setback and height regulations Single Family 2 stories and 28 feet 1 story and 20 feet 6 000 square feet 9 000 square feet 50 feet NA 15 feet 20 feet 15 feet 5 feet 5 feet 15 feet 15 feet 25 fect 3 feet 8 30 feet 9 12 feet at the street right of w1y 10 All garages for two family residences must be set back 6 feet from the front of the residence Only two stall gai ages at a maximum are allowed on two family residences and each garage must be accessed fi om driveways on different streets 11 Two family rear yard garage set back 5 feet 1 Maximum building height Main building Garages 2 Average lot area (for PUD) 2 a Average lot area for two family resi dences (for PUD) 3 Minimum lot width 4 Minimum lot depth 5 Minimum front yard requirements Front yard —House Front yard —Garage (front facing)' Fi ont yard —Garage (side facing) 6 Side yard Interior House Garage Corner House Garage 7 Rear yard House Garage Frontage Requu ement2 Dnveway width maximum A minimum of 25 percent of lots must have garages completely recessed (more than six feet from front of a building of porch) a minimum of 25 percent of lots mu t have the guages set back two feet or mole and a maximum of 50 percent of garages may pi oject a maximum of six feet out horn the front wall of the residence Of that 50 percent 25 percent must h ive habitable space Shove the gai age and 25 percent must have front porches Supp No 13 CD31 16 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO PUD/05-73 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 7135-7143 Manning Avenue Comprehensive Plan District Rural Residential Zoning District CR Applicants Name Croix Capital Group Type of Application Planned Unit Development Project Description The request is for a 20 residential lot Planned Unit Development on 8 acres of land Background/Setting The 8 acre site is located on Manning Avenue, a two-lane county road scheduled for widening in 2007/2008 To accommodate the widening a 110 foot right of way easement will be required along the west property boundary The site is surrounded by the Liberty Development, a Phase I expansion area site, to the north, east and south The Liberty Development contains a range of single family housing types, Lakeshore, Traditional Cottage and Townhouse Residential The residential unit type surrounding the subject site is Townhouse Residential to the north and Cottage Residential (small lot single family) to the east and south (see Cases CPA/05-01 and ZAM/05-01 for additional background) The Site The 8 acre development site is composed of two parcels of land each containing a single family residence A demolition permit is required for removal of the residences if they are over 50 years old The site is heavily forested with a variety of evergreens and deciduous trees (see tree survey) Of special note are the large Oak trees (estimated at over 200 years old) Existing trees buffer the site from Manning Avenue to the north and cottage lots to the south Storm water flows through the site from Grant under Manning Avenue and flows to the north Zoning As proposed, the zoning for the site is Cottage Residential A copy of the district regulations is attached to the zoning amendment staff report (Case No ZAM/05- 01) The proposed subdivision meets the lot size and dimension requirements for the cottage zoning district To buffer development from Manning Avenue, a 100 foot special setback from the road right of way is required The proposed development is setback 25' to 75' As indicated in the application, the existing tree stand buffers the site from the road A retaining wall is shown on the development plans to narrow the right of way needed for road improvements and maintain the tree buffer The site development plans shows combined driveway access to 11 of the 20 lots This approach fits the cluster development to the site and helps buffer the housing from CR 15 by placing the garage between the house living space and the road and conceals the auto from the front of houses and pedestrian space (see Engineer's comments on private drives) Park Dedication The park dedication requirement is 10% of net site area or 6 acres Open space area "C" around the base of the large Oak trees is 5,294 square feet Other open space areas not including the right of way totals 88,478 square feet or 2 acres This area contains trails, amenity water features and drainage ponds A 43,335 square foot right of way dedication is required Active recreation use of the open space area is limited It is suggested that the lot between Area C and the existing Liberty Development be considered for additional active neighborhood park space See attached site data table for averages Public Utilities/Drainage Road and utility services are extended from Liberty Development to the site The City Engineer has reviewed the development plans and offer the attached comments The comments range from temporary site access during construction to grading, road improvements and drainage Engineer comments are incorporated as conditions of PUD and preliminary plat approval and will need to be addressed in plans before final approval Landscape Plan A site development landscape plan shows the existing trees to be preserved and extensive street and site landscaping The landscape plan indicates vegetative type, size and number Site landscaping shall be coordinated with subdivision and building site improvements to ensure planting at the appropriate time before residence occupancy Because street design and location of some of the units, across a creek, guest parking may need to be provided off some of the private drives as shown for the south building cluster A fence and landscaping should be provided to screen and buffer the driveway from the rear of the Liberty residences to the south Building Design No individual building design has been submitted for the residential lots As a part of final PUD approval, examples of building designs should be submitted for review to maintain compatibility with the Liberty Development City design approval of individual lots house and landscaping will be required before building permit approval 10 60 120 J 40"E / GROSS SITE AREA EXISTING HWY 15 R.O W PENDING ADDED R.O W T SITE AREA PEN SPACE AREA A OPEN SPACE AREA C OPEN SPACE AREA A & C % OPEN SPACE 1 & 2 OPEN SPACE AREA B TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA MAJOR TREES PRESERVED RETAINING WALLS OPEN SPACE AREA 1 OPEN SPACE AREA 2 OPEN SPACE AREA 3 ADDED AMENITIES FOOT BRIDGES HWY 15 BIKE TRAIL DENSITY AVERAGE LOT AREA REQUIRED LOT AREA / AREA -SF 339 738 00 36,052.00 43,335.00 259 988 00 88 478 00 5,294 00 43,335 00 137107.00 9 SF 148 SF 6755SF 842 SF QUANTITY 3 7 1700 LF 740 LF 29DUPER GROSS SItE 33 DU PER NET SITE 6,665 SF PER LOT 6,000 SF PER LOT �,' AREA -AC 7.80 0.83 0 99 5 97 2 15 27 00% 0 99 315 CF GI CHI 6428 STIL PHC FAX CC SE' OA PU EN AI\ PI A preliminary plat accompanies this concept PUD approval and provides for the subdivision and improvement of the lots Comments from the City Engineer apply both to the concept PUD approval and preliminary plat This subdivision is located on Manning Avenue, a county road The preliminary plat has been submitted to the County Public Works Department for comments As of this writing, no comments have been received Construction access from Manning Avenue and retaining wall improvements made by the developer will have to be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer No direct road access is provided to Manning Avenue to the site The PUD and preliminary plat is before the Planning Commission for review and recommendation to the City Council The Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board will act on the project before final review and approval by the City Council Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 Designs for housing sites shall be reviewed with final PUD approval 2 Site landscaping shall be installed and coordinated with subdivision improvements and individual site improvements 3 Each building design and landscape plan shall be approved by the City's Community Development Director before a building permit is issued All landscaping shall be installed or security provided before building occupancy 4 Comments from Washington County Public Works shall be incorporated into development plans 5 Comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed and approved by the City Engineer before final plat approval as listed below 6 Access to the site during grading and utility construction shall be on County Road 15 and not through Liberty Development 7 The overall grading plan should show the proposed contours for the entire lot including the building pads Because of limited space for access and storing excess material, the site should be mass graded 8 No storm runoff shall drain into the Liberty Development 9 Connection to the existing storm sewer at the northwest corner of the property should be made to the pond The outlet pipe from the pond (27" RCP) should be no bigger than the existing pipe (24" RCP) The result of this may change the conditions of the pond This will have to be reanalyzed 10 Provide water quality information on all the ponds 11 Provide soil borings and permeability information 12 The HWL of pond Pro P4 encroaches into the building pad of the adjacent lot The plan should show a retaining wall at this location 13 A minimum 3 1 slope is required for all pond locations 14 All sidewalks shall be a minimum four feet from the curb 15 The centerline street radius on the north end should be increased to 48 feet 16 Stormwater plan should be submitted to and approved by Browns Creek Watershed District 17 Plans should be submitted to Washington County for approval Staff noted that minimum setbacks from the county have not been met Such a proposal should be reviewed carefully, given the inherit conflict with road noise that will result 18 Right -of Way minimum width is 60 feet 19 Retaining walls along the curb should be pulled back, preferably to the right-of- way line This will allow for utilities and snow storage 20 Dedicate utility and drainage easements for the alley ways and trail easements 21 Construction access plan for the property sites the make use of an alley 22 Open Space Area C shall be expanded to include lot to the east to meet park dedication requirements as reviewed and approved by the Parks Board 23 All impact fees shall be paid before final subdivision/ PUD approval 24 Grading limits and tree protection shall be clearly defined and grading controlled by sturdy snow fencing No grading shall begin until fencing is installed 25 Construction traffic, subdivision and building shall enter the site directly from Manning Avenue to minimize impact on the Liberty neighborhood 26 A solid wood fence and landscaping shall be installed to screen the south combined driveway from cottage residents to the south Findings The proposed Planned Unit Development as proposed and conditioned is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Policy and Zoning Ordinance requirements Attachments Application and plans Memorandum To Steve Russell, Community Development Director S-S From Shawn Sanders, Assistant City Enigneer Date December 8, 2005 Re Design review comments for Royal Oaks Realty and Liberty West Liberty West 1 Access to the site dunng grading and utility construction shall be on County Road 15 and not through Liberty Development 2 The overall grading plan should show the proposed contours for the entire lot including the building pads Because of limited space for access and stonng excess matenal, the site should be mass graded 3 No storm runoff shall drain into the Liberty Development 4 Connection to the existing storm sewer at the northwest corner of the property should be made to the pond The outlet pipe from the pond (27" RCP) should no bigger than the existing pipe (24" RCP) The result of this may change the conditions of the pond This will have to be reanalyzed 5 Provide water quality information on all the ponds 6 Provide soil bonngs and permeability information 7 The HWL of pond Pro P4 encroaches into the building pad of the adjacent lot The plan should show a retaining wall at his location> 8 A minimum 3 1 slope is required for all pond locations 9 All sidewalks shall be a minimum four feet from the curb 10 The centerline street radius on the north end should be increased to at 48 feet 11 Stormwater plan should be submitted to and approved by Browns Creek Watershed Distnct 12 Plans should be submitted to Washington County for approval Staff noted that minimum setbacks from the county have not been met Such a proposal should be reviewed carefully, given the inhent conflict with road noise that will result 13 Right -of Way minimum width is 60 feet 14 Retaining walls along the curb should be pulled back, preferably to the nght-of- way line This will allow for utilities and snow storage 15 Dedicate utility and drainage easements for the alley ways and trail easements 16 Construction access plan for the property sites the make use of an alley PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Vanance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* —Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted In connection with any application All supporting material (l e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the C/ty of Saltwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan Is required with applications Any Incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION o Zp C0( it Address of Project 114 k 1(35 Mitia1tt,10 Alg ►S, Assessors Parcel No 441,332- (GEO Code) Zoning Distnct Descnpbon of Project OP�ptJ IS(DIJ ©F `U6t�ehf 013 IRS G' 6(116 J "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify ! will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner c15 WAM015 Representative Mailing Address QQ L 24 Mailing Address City - State - zip 611LIVA , V4+IJ 55432 City - State - Zp Telephone Np--(Q Signature I 4' Telephone No Signature ature !red) (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area 1 8 k SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Budding floor area square feet Existing square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces LIBERTY VILLAGE 3RD ADD � d SETTLERS ENGLAND ERTY ON THE LAKE 6711 °KINSHIP GREEN HOMESTEAD 1 GREEN a' Location Map L4 i 61 4 i i- R_IW R2OW RI9W R22W R_IW RAW Vicinity Map 0 335 Scale in Feet This r.an era ma.am ,mpmaram. ethey ws.wowxalbsa nomanp Mod bed a vMvmu WO0o N/ wonlmmm can aM mpwl am rcu.clo Source wm.mm Cot. W Ilb Phan. p3 1430® • 1 water. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will meet on Monday, December 12, 2005, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider a request from Croix Capital Group for Planned Unit Development for a 20 lot development on 8 0 acres of land located at 7135 - 7143 Manning Avenue in the Cottage Residential, CR, District Case No PUD/05-73 All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this meeting Steve Russell Community Development Director Publish December 2, 2005 CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 4. 4 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/05-75 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 7135-7143 Manning Avenue Comprehensive Plan District Rural Residential Zoning District CR Applicants Name Croix Capital Group Project Description Twenty residential lot subdivisions located at 7135 - 7143 Manning Avenue Discussion Subdivision is analyzed as a part of the the Planned Unit Development review, Case No PUD 05-73 Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 Designs for housing sites shall be reviewed with final PUD approval 2 Site landscaping shall be installed and coordinated with subdivision improvements and individual site improvements 3 Each building design and landscape plan shall be approved by the City's Community Development Director before a building permit is issued All landscaping shall be installed or security provided before building occupancy 4 Comments from Washington County Public Works shall be incorporated into development plans 5 Comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed and approved by the City Engineer before final plat approval as listed below 6 Access to the site during grading and utility construction shall be on County Road 15 and not through Liberty Development 7 The overall grading plan should show the proposed contours for the entire lot including the building pads Because of limited space for access and storing excess material, the site should be mass graded 8 No storm runoff shall drain into the Liberty Development 9 Connection to the existing storm sewer at the northwest corner of the property should be made to the pond The outlet pipe from the pond (27" RCP) should be no bigger than the existing pipe (24" RCP) The result of this may change the conditions of the pond This will have to be reanalyzed 10 Provide water quality information on all the ponds 11 Provide soil borings and permeability information 1 i 12 The HWL of pond Pro P4 encroaches into the building pad of the adjacent lot The plan should show a retaining wall at this location 13 A minimum 3 1 slope is required for all pond locations 14 All sidewalks shall be a minimum four feet from the curb 15 The centerline street radius on the north end should be increased to 48 feet 16 Stormwater plan should be submitted to and approved by Browns Creek Watershed District 17 Plans should be submitted to Washington County for approval Staff noted that minimum setbacks from the county have not been met Such a proposal should be reviewed carefully, given the inherit conflict with road noise that will result 18 Right -of Way minimum width is 60 feet 19 Retaining walls along the curb should be pulled back, preferably to the right-of- way line This will allow for utilities and snow storage 20 Dedicate utility and drainage easements for the alley ways and trail easements 21 Construction access plan for the property sites the make use of an alley 22 Open Space Area C shall be expanded to include lot to the east to meet park dedication requirements as reviewed and approved by the Parks Board 23 All impact fees shall be paid before final subdivision/ PUD approval 24 Grading limits and tree protection shall be clearly defined and grading controlled by sturdy snow fencing No grading shall begin until fencing is installed 25 Construction traffic, subdivision and building shall enter the site directly from Manning Avenue to minimize impact on the Liberty neighborhood 26 A solid wood fence and landscaping shall be installed to screen the south combined driveway from cottage residents to the south Findings The subdivision is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Policy and Zoning Ordinance requirements as amended in Case No CPA/05-01 and ZAM/05-01 Attachments Application and plans 14 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/05-74 Planning Commission Date December 12, 2005 Project Location 1778 Greeley Street South Comprehensive Plan Distnct Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicants Name Gary Starns Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Descnption A special use permit for an auto sales business Discussion The applicant is requesting a special use permit to operate an auto The businesses name will be Oakgreen Auto He will use five (5) spaces in the lot to display the autos that are for sale The hours will be 8 00 am to 5 00 pm signage will fill up to 1/3 of the inside window of the building, there will be no Recommendation Approval with conditions sales business existing parking At this time the extenor signage Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved permit shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 No more than five (5) autos shall be for sale at one time 3 All exterior signage requires design review by the HPC 4 No banners, pennants, nbbons, streamers, stnng of light bulbs, spinners, or similar devices 5 All autos shall be parked on paved surfaces 6 No autos shall be elevated 7 Existing pylon sign shall be removed 8 A landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director before permit is issued 9 All parts and equipment shall be screened 10 Trash area shall be screened Findings The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise detnmental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter from the Applicant/Site Plan PLANNING ADMINISTR -ION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed ePaid / W 6C Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED z <SOP/03---71./ lip31,05?-.1 /Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and eng►neermg fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal (► e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the appl►cant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project / 775 612-e-e L-Qy SD Assessor's Parcel No L..5-iQ(3o7OQ4_ Zoning Districtb f [_Description of Project (GEO Code) "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct / further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner C 4+ems Got dczvci`i , Mailing Address?magi-it/S City - State - Zip Olajoitti j2/1,1550g2— Telephone No 4 9-3K‘-ill Signature Representative 1,9Iy S744VNS Mailing Address Siti%, 079-KIDE.EE )J 4j City - State - Zip S4/ 1lli,4eg, 144-, _Isztr - Telephone No r - -off% Q,5.--3k Signature ,evyA, (Signature is required) (Signattii a is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area i2b0 square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM April 20 2005 1 Qm' 1.01 9Pm 49. i OA WEST ORLEANS STREET,,. s, 3 MIT A d .9 K U Z O^R d01 aaa tl �r l� 0' BPo 0 tnta e A ca. AC STMTT VACATED S MOD 91 DOC BTtlW RA SE ant O`. 4r. 2 O. 1 Location Map --— CURVE 151 a^+ cR ST w ewz'" a BLVD Doo or' W‘\X\X A A V Y^ a�« O. O U RS AD 19 TI.E60.11.1 ail IT CA 0/ CATO ROAD EA ENE ER Doc eoaaw V. 0 A SHELTON A ®` Ae a 8^ / / T ig ery r / ILIW R-OW RI9W R_ W R-IW R_OW Vicinity Map 254 Scale in Feet wMw . t. tlm ewer arc.. w. mdw mu conutnaDID d W ��mca.^ry ,col mn �.racles curt Wasting county Survey. Rea n^. I 88 art am.:1m /54100 Informal., mphamm 34 200 w Rot. !Yoram w 20D gy,/ (uaaa9tio /7114r/v470,x4 Lo-rJ1-04 o)0-4 1°1,J • L977 CUrra3 ti (Kaa-av0 Pq, ,r_rwi/u4n/ oThr- TA-€40 '71/y r?-piy.?f)-6y--ro-yr1)-2ff 071 'pr ry-r_'" vox) fie pf .v7ve • Tvaia-rQ 5(A-7t7 7-)3P0P mi)/ A47-1P,7° Vh awor -q77-vaztr270-0/ pOlf QIT/0 • r?-,A 4f2/13", 017 rpr TOW 0-7110??. W'_era" vrrr-0 (fr f>2ry rpiAA/rd Zrrr 07907,0 Th(0 err Irr-P-(Y) 01Y)-Qo P4p') ,44/47e Q41/ ('a'a'zewo 5Q � // T ' c Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director /1/ Date• December 8, 2005 Subject Annexation of 8 Acres of Land Located East of Manning Avenue Adjacent Phase 1 Annexation Area located at 7135-7143 Manning Avenue Case No ANN/05-01 Background The subject site is located in the Phase IV annexation area The Orderly Annexation Agreement allows owners of property in the Phase IV area to petition the City for annexation at any time It is then up to the City to decide if the annexation can be accommodated is appropriate and consistent with City planning policy Analysis The site is surrounded by the Phase I Liberty Project Street and utilities were extended to the site to accommodate future development and the proposed land use is consistent with surrounding area land use The proposed development is consistent with the amended City Comprehensive Plan and Cottage Residential Zoning Recommendation Recommend annexation to City Council Attachment Annexation map Location Map / M 4 s' ( 150 MANNING AVENUE • 7 A • MANNING AVENUE i Gt A A A 15 t CSAH 15 r r cm % OggO \ W CA 01 S :: S' l ul Aal m m m= 3640 6 m m 436 '_ ' o rn ` `z � z � - � £,�7 (n � , -wae qlitaC j —a�ee Z m �� 45. .82 �''000 6�� LP!. ` �'� S� E6S �3 - _ .666 �zse , o\�•Z� ��'' d'�. .. O 76 cr 9 w 2� .; 366� 3667r1� 3654 61 o) Ca � � `�'i�• Ve < r '!�� � _ \ cr i cn 2 0 '� z c3� 03 N GF p w�+4 64 'A • m `364 / ` i < ' 7� fr. ,. �I co rn O ��ti 1)1 ..`' GL 1 �� 1 i • 6' 2 1 M3495 1. Oi, ov : CA _ ' ► mEr�� w • • 11L,'P „ ,s j�s`; 0 � 7 ti S �2� 3S �w \ 1 l 3475 - " S a co Ql ; ! \ w 1Z co w \' • oy coa' o Opp �, � `� `� ` "'00 .�.S�� ^ 330 cP ~ \� `�(Sp ly' 312 �'' 1 tivc4 i ` `°.� �� ` i Vol•o l - VAIN/3 - 448 _ ` 3436 1 , 313 449 rO 34' m 1f�2i '`� vi C • O D . ��etc 3317 3412 _ •� `2` ► i� a� \ °' oo w'° _ i o G� u' 3320 No , i -ay Rjy oo� N �,� �� • m - ` Ir --� 0 ' j ' 332 �� 1 N wf AL i,`9� 3NI R 2 2 2 Z NX s13Y aV� - � r �� �i 14A @n Y m -11 al '�iq1 § 7 E, E IIIIIIIPP04- Imo , z PM z z 1 ) Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines . ,,,,.....„.,„ '".s."-• ' '"'" • "• • E,' ,‘,7'..": f- ' ''' •"''''' ii'ag:.r..t,1:41:q6.4•:;•7:4:.f.-9:7."."5,tSir...;:z7;:...,Y,,....',,,'4 '7. ' ''''''' January 15, 2006 Table of Contents Introduction 4 • Conservation District Purpose and Map • Design Review and Guidelines Purpose • Conservation Distract Area Background andHistory Design Review Process • Types of projects needing review • Design Review considerations • Design Review process steps ,p3' o Preliminary Review Meeting o Application and Design Checklist Subrriission o Planning Staff Review and Report o HPC Public heanng o Approval/Conditional Appro.WUDisapproval o Building Permit o Appeal o Enforcement Design Guidelines • A Bnef History till, alerArchitectural Styles • Stillwater ArchitecStyles • Neighborhoods and Stre+es o Rhythm, Massing and Scale o Streetsqap and Frontage o RooFonns -tlnd Height • o Presring Puplic Views Building it`ua o Designing with Natural Features o Building Location and Setbacks o Garage Location and Character o Drainage Considerations • Architectural Detail o Facade Doors, windows and proportions o Details supporting style o Materials, textures and color • Summary Design Checklist and Application Form Appendix o Conservation District Map o Stillwater Neighborhood Historic Architectural Surveys and Map o Glossary o Resources 6 8 12 15 20 24 Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 3 Introduction Stillwater, the "birthplace of Minnesota", is a historic town with a rich and varied character and architectural heritage Influenced by its presence on 1.10 St Croix River and its unique topography, Stillwater's neighborhoods and streetsces showcase a range of residential architectural styles Much of the architecture thatlna1Cttllwater unique was developed m the prosperous Lumber Period of the late 1800's, ranging from ii dest worker's houses to elaborate 19's century "lumber baron" mansions Conservation District A Residential Conservation District has b established to help protect and preserve unique character of Stillwater's residential neighborhoods, by regulating and providing Design Guidelines for new mfill development within the District Its purpose isAtKplserrve the traditional neighborhood fib fad future mfill development within thh9 trict, and discourage unnecessary demolition of structures that contribute to the district's historic character A CRItsgrvation District helps preserve local c pride, and property promote and sustain affordable homes and econo area „aFghborhood IFlso helps verse range of is vitality of the In the conse atioTr trict, new construction projects a reviewe using standards that emphasize c� b development in terms of size, massing ands elationship to the larger neighborhood context, and to a lesser degree, specific architectural features Design Review The purpose of the Design Review is II rsf.rm■ffi MEET. • 13.�rt,. r. •� a lwoRE=ram Skffingt omlt iAlwLA g ,A, ti,t��lammaim 1 =!L Ltr4 * ..i ULl4 ! See appendix for more detailed map Design Guidelines These Design Guidelmes serve as a common reference for all those involved in the process of new construction m the District • Property Owners, Neighbors and Establish a method by which those Residents involved or affected by new residential construction in the District can work together to preserve that which makes Stillwater's neighborhoods unique • Provide guidelines to help educate and inform the public about key issues regarding history, neighborhood and context m new infill development • Promote "Good Neighbor" considerations for new infill projects regarding design and privacy of adjacent properties ■ Architects, Designers and Builders • City Staff, Heritage Preservation Commission and City Council members The guidelines are intended to serve as a framework to guide the design process, allowing for individuality and creativity in architectural design Stillwater Conservation District 4 Design Guidelmes Context Introduction Stillwater Conservation District Area Background and History The area included in the Stillwater Conservation District was built between 1843, when the first lumber sawmill was constructed, and 1914 when the/tot log floated down the St Croix River During this era (1843-1914) Stillwater was a typic#Aliejulnbering community of the nineteenth century - a place where logs were shipped and hunter was cut to build cities as distant as St Louis The Conservation District is a unique, pedestnan-oriented area with porches, mature landscapes, sidewalks and boulevards, built before the age of the automobile The Conservation Distract is intended to conserv4 'the older nineteenth century residential structures and historic neighborhoods In the first three decades of Stillwater's existen e . ost of the building took place downtown, in "the original bowl" as it was called However, during that time, the more affluent built their homes on the hillsides surrounding downtown —above the fray The remainder of the old city was built in the 1880's and 1890's-wben the national economy and the lumber business was good Although the neighborhood avd ge of residence sizes, there is a preponderance of smaller houses (many smce added o 'that served working and middle-class residents While people think of Stillwater in terms of i umber baron mansions," the smaller vernacular houses deserve an equal amount of attention in evaluation of new construction iY 4ia.�' Ongtnal Neighbor1` • North Hill bounded by downtown on the east and south, by Laurel Street on the north, b Fi eet on the west Y • South ill boun 4 by downtown on the north Yeast, b illard Street on the south, by Fo treet on the west • West Hill bounded by downtown on the east, by Sixth Street on the west, by Myrtle Street on the north, by Pine Street on the south Within the Conservation District, there are a few neighborhoods which merit particular consideration " Pine Street In the late nineteenth century, Pine Street was considered the finest address in the city Today it likely has the best concentration of large well-preserved homes of any street in the city Infill on Pine Street should be subject to particular care Holcombe's Additions Located between Greeley Street and Holcombe Street, between Willard Street and Hancock Street, is the oldest residential area of the city outside of downtown Typical of the 1850's and `60's, most of the homes were small, and many of them have since been replaced with newer housing Infill housing, particularly those adjacent to the older houses, deserve special attention and care Dutchtown Dutchtown, or Charlottenburg, was a isolated community for much of the nineteenth century built around the Schulenburg & Boeckeler Lumber Company It was the classic "company town" with almost all small houses of two and three rooms, for laborers at the mill Today, though most of the houses have been replaced or enlarged, the narrow streetscape still recalls its history In the design of new construction, the historical antecedents of this area should be considered Stillwater Conservation District Degign Guidelines 5 Design Review Process Design Review and Public Hearings are conducted by the City of Stillwater's Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) The seven member HPC is appointed by City Council, and meets on the first Monday of every month • Projects Subject to Design Review Infill new construction in Stillwater's Conservation District will require Desi Review Infill projects are new residentia commercial structures built on undevelop lots or previously occupied lots (where an existing structure exists and would be demolished), within the district The HPC uses the Design Review Guideline��t here to review proposals v Additions and alterations to existing buildgs are not subject to design review However, it is suggested that the , ,fit n guidelines presented here also be : ed ue in the design of additions an to ions, given the impact such renovations ve on adjacent residences, the streets pie and the neighborhood Note that all District is s for the site Zo elope ect to Ci nt in the Conservation Zonmg Regulations onservation District sites is Smgle family Resident RA, Duplex Resident RB or General Commercial CA Design Review Considerations Key elements of Design Review are • Massing; scale; roof forms • Design character in relationship to neighborhood, street, and adjacent houses • Siting and existmg natural features • Details, Color, Materials, Landscaping _ The goal of the guidelines is to help Infill projects become a "good neighbor" by enhancing the unique character of the neighborhoods, the visual harmony of the streetscape, and the prevailing patterns of neighborhood houses Design' eview Process 1 Initial Review Meeting with City Planning Staff The goals and intent of the Design Review process will be explained, along with the guidelines, application requirements and schedule 2 Application and Design Checklist Submission The checklist indicates how the proposed Infill development will relate to adjacent neighbors' houses, the streetscape and the neighborhood (this form is included in the appendix of this book) Required scaled drawings include Building Plans, Site Plan showing location of sidewalks, setbacks from property lines and street Elevation Drawings of each face of the building should indicate materials, color and general design character The design application should be submitted according to current deadline and meeting schedule, which can be obtained from the Plannmg Department 3 Planning Staff Review and Report This report will be sent to applicant and the HPC Stillwater Conservation District 6 Design Guidelines Design Review Process 4 HPC Design Review and Public Hearing The HPC shall hold a public hearing on all infill design review applications The public will be notifie in the local paper and notice sent t property owners within 300 feet of site At the meeting, the applicant will present the proposed infill, after discussion and public input, the HPC will either approve, approve with ► . tions, or disapprove the proposed de 5 Approval When the applicati is approved, a Design Permit will be issued to the applicant and Builsting Department 6 Appeal The apant�f nsatisfied with the HPC actsn,�ay revise and resubmit the application f;the HPC or, within 10 days of HPC action, may appeal the decision to City Council 7 BuildinPermit Once approved, the plans maYt"tiomp$ ted and submitted to Building Off i' for Building Permit review At this point the plans will also be reviewed for Design Permit compliance 8 Enforcement The Community Development Department will monitor compliance with Design Permit approval Violations are enforced in accordance with City's Zoning Ordinances ' DesigiAeview Goals and Intent In summary, the Design Guidelines and Design Review Process should not be proscriptive or burdensome to the applicant The guidelines are intended to provide a flexible framework of design considerations that can help educate and guide the infill of our unique existing neighborhoods with new structures This process cannot guarantee good design, but ideally will prevent infill that is insensitive, incongruous or detrimental to the nearby homes and the neighborhood Put simply, applicants are encouraged to consider the impact of new mfill construction and what it means to be a "good neighbor" to adjacent houses, the established streetscape, and the overall neighborhood character Design Review Process Summary 1 Initial Review Meeting with City Staff 2 Complete Application and Design Checklist*, submit with drawings according to current schedule 3 Planning Staff review and report to HPC 4 HPC Design Review and Public Hearing Approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval 5 If approved, Staff will issue Design Permit 6 Submit for Building Permit 7 If dissatisfied with HPC action, revise *See Appendix for Application and Design Checklist Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 7 Design Guidelines Stillwater Architectural Styles Early History The general layout and plan 9,gi4j1water was based on models evolving cejtielaiting of the first towns of Nd land The original plat of rectilinear strre rid blocks organized residential and commercial development roughly parallel to the St Croix River Later adtttons to this central downtown area ere lasitt, ut according to standard north/stiu, surve es, resulting in a shift of the grid �b >Fty ocks Small lot sizes allowed dense development of residential and commercial uses, with larger buildings required to occupy multiple lots Stiliwater's numerous ravines and steep hillsides created breaks and discontinuity in the grid, opening valuable green s d overlooks Often, prominent lilufflines Architectural Styles Many of the first structures built in Stillwater were vernacular workers' houses, designed and built by local carpenters Labor was cheap, but materials expensive, so the houses were often small, 1-1/2 stories, with gabled, wood shingled roofs Most ongmal houses were simple rectangles, but soon porches and other additions made to mcrease hvmg space formed the familiar "L" shaped plans that we see today With the use of architectural pattern books, more sophisticated styles popular in other parts of the country became common in Stillwater Greek Revival, Italianate and Gothic Revival were among the first to take paces an root in the 1850's-1880's, followed by popular "Victorian" styles in tthe 1880's- became the building sites for the city's most notable civic structures and residences Locally milled white pine framed and sheathed the buildings, and locally quarried limestone formed most of their foundations _ _ 1900's, mcludmg Second Empire, Stick Style, and Queen Anne The following pages introduce and bnefly _describe several of the most common styles seen in Stillwater Stillwater Conservation District 8 Design Guidelmes Design Guidelines Greek Revival (1845-1880) Stillwater Architectural Styles 19th Century Vernacular (1845-1910) The Greek Revival style emulates the Greek J�ernacular Houses of the 19th century are Temple with proportion and formalimerous in the district, modestly sized, and arrangement It was popular with both public' of side construction They may have been and domestic architecture in the mid- designed by carpenters or by the owners nineteenth century The designs of the Greek themselves, and built with locally milled and Revival could be very simple or complek manufactured products These houses depending on the level of articulation Mast f; originally had minimal ornamentation and in Stillwater were detailed simply AY - ; 4 often have very simple plans and elevations -t.\ Local examples are often 1-1/2 stories Characteristics may mclude • Primary low-pitched ga`t}i'' �z with returns at the eaves `; • Square or rectangular plan 3 • Single or 1-1/2 story massing' • Promment, proportional columns and pilasters e; • Secondary Cft) rf§-�vr porches, portico at e • Entry door with sitvl ghts and narrow transom • Simple, flat trim at corners and frieze M ar4 beneath eaves • Evniy spa windows Characteristics may mclude • Front gable or side gable • Rectangular or L-shaped plans • Close proximity to neighboring houses • Lap sidmg • Minimal ornament — of standard millwork (turned or stamped) • Standing seam steel roof material or wood shingles • Receding or minimal additions at rear • 2 over 2 double -hung windows, vertically proportioned • Chimney in center between rooms Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 9 Design Guidelines Stillwater Architectural Styles Itahanate (1850-1885) The Italianate style was commonly built in Midwestern cities in the mid to late 19th century Often these houses are two or three stones Itahanate houses follow a more casual Interpretation of ideas that influenced t formal Italian renaissance houses of Eur_ Much effort was given to the decor I've elements, especially at window & d"&t� openings and eave details Characteristics may include • Low pitched hip (often trulited) roof • A square plan • Full two story mg • Symmetnca wmdows • A porch roof ed by square posts (with chamfered co ers), which rest on low pedestals • Singltpmaired brackets at eaves • D oratid ornice line • Ettlborate window and door trim nt of 9 Queen Anne (1880-1910) e Queen Anne style became popular toward the,,_of the 19th century and continued mto the fir decade of the 20th century Pattern books, mail-order plans, manufacturing, mass production and distribution were popularizing the notion of architectural style Manufactured products, doors, windows, and spindles, were used in a more decorative manner Decorative patterns of masonry and wood siding matenals are also common in the Queen Anne style Charactenstics may Include • Multiple steeply pitched roofs • Asymmetrical plans and facades • Porches with lathe -turned and sawn trun •—Numerous-ornamental elements • Variety of window shapes and sizes • Textured wall surface treatment • Extended, decorated upper gables • Patterned masonry chimneys Stillwater Conservation District 10 Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Stillwater Architectural Styles Gothic Revival (1840-1890) p American Foursquare (1900-1930) - Steeply pitched central gable or pairs of j jypically 2 or 2-1/2 stories, relatively small gables, Dormers as extension of walls, 17square plans, regular facade, low pitched pointed or arched windows, vertically whipped roofs, with hipped dormers, full - enhanced proportions egth front porch with square columns French Second Empire (1850-1885) Mansart roof (straight, flared, concave, or convex), Molding/tnm at the break line between roof planes, scrolls at sill of window trim, Italtanate cornice, brackets, and eave details East Lake -Stick Style (1860-1890) Steep roof pitches, multidirectional wall texture (usually of board siding), exposed gable trusses, rafter tails and bracketing Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 11 Design Guidelmes Stillwater's neighborhoods are composed of pedestri Y. nented streetscapes with a wide variety of architectural styles Originally, some neighborh. t s were populated with modest homes of laborers, while others had more elaborate residenc - • suri'b ed by open spaces Gradually, many of the smaller homes were modified and added onto, an many open spaces and lots were mfilled with a variety of homes The result is an eclectic mix of residential styles and sizes that can be seen on most streets within Stillwater' Conservation District One primary Design Guideline goal is to n mfill structures relate to their streetscape and neighborhood, as well as to individual house cent to the infill site The intent of these guidelines is not to provide a Sect set of rules, but rather general design considerations and principles to help guide development of these sites The next section contams the De*Imes for mfill lots These Design Guidelines are organized by Neighborhood and ire :k Guidelines 1-5), Building and Site (Guidelines 6- 15), and Architectural Details/Goo s w' eighbor Considerations (Guidelines #16-27) Neighborhoods and Sheets Consider neighbonng structures on infill lots Guideline # 1 Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures The massing and scale of new buildings should try to follow the predominant pattern of the neighborhood Special consideration should be given to adjacent structures, especially if they are consistent with the pattern of the neighborhood The scale and volume of the new building should respect its context and adjacent neighbors, not overwhelm them or stand out _due to inappropriate size A well designed building and site has a proportional relationship with adjoining properties and maintains the rhythm and scale of the streetscape by using similar massmg, proportions and details Stillwater Conservation Distnct 12 Design Guidelmes Design Guidelines Appropnate'fill new house maintains overall massmg rhythm, sideyard spacing, aligns with predominant street setback Guideline #2 Respect the existing rhyt streetscape New inftll construction should attempt to maintain the exist `i" _ attern and rhythm of the stre Uniform narrow lots na set up a strong rhythm on the streetfront, and many design aspects of new construction should be considered in relatmg to that rhythm Building massing, scale and orientation, roof forms, porches, building setbacks, garage and driveway locations, and landscaping all can contribute to the new structure's compatibility with the existing pattern and rhythm of the streetscape Neighborhoods and Streets propnate Infill new house is more massive di is rhythm along street, does not follow existing alignment Guideline #3 Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties One Important component of street rhythm is the building -front alignment and setback from the street and boulevard On many blocks, there is a predominant setback or alignnient that, when followed, helps reinforce a feeling of unity on the streetscape In most cases, relating to the predominant alignment is appropriate, even if some existing structures may not follow it Varying lot sizes, corner lots, and other considerations should be examined on a case -by -case basis to determine where, and to what degree vanations from setbacks are appropriate Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 13 Design Guidelines Neighborhoods andfttzets Appropriate infill roof forms height an&tail compatable Guideline #4 Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of cmting roofs in the neighborho�� The perceptio, massmg and the rhythm of a builduig4s greatly affected by its roof form and height Though a vanety of roof forms may be seen on a street, the new building's roof should appear compatible in scale, pitch, onentation and complexity to those surrounding it Oversized roofs due to unduly massive building volumes, or large unbroken roof surfaces parallel to the street, are examples of roof forms to be avoided If the infill building is larger than those nearby, consider adjusting the massing to allow the larger roof forms to be more articulated and broken down into smaller, well -scaled components Inappropriate Infi11 roof forms not compatable large unbroken surfaces • Guideline #5 Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context Building height alone isn't adequate in considering the relationship of adjacent structures Two buildings of the same height can be perceived quite differently in terms of scale and compatibility, depending on the overall massing ofthe building, its articulation and its roof forms Certain=architectural=styles=are=more appropnate than others when considermg roof forms that fit a site and its context Consider the pitch, slope and orientation of primary gables, and the use of hip roofs, in adjusting the apparent building volume, mass, and —height, as appropriate to building style and - context Consider usmg projecting elements, roof forms, shed roofs, dormers and gables, when appropriate Stillwater Conservation District 14 Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Building and Site In Stillwater, many sites have natural features, sloped `pography, and existing mature trees Building and site design should respond to and be building to the land rather than the land to the building ced by natural features, adapting the Appropnate Adjusting the building to respect existing vegetation and slope %tea. Guideline #64, Building and site -design should respond to natal features Locate builduc o ,., ¢on the site to work with exist 1;'ignific trees, slopes, and other natural - C r1es onsider locations of walks, driveways attdarages that will minimize site disruption, erosion or damage to nearby or adjacent root systems Guideline #7 Respect the site's natural slope m new building design minimize cut, fill and retaining walls When possible, locate structures to follow the natural contours of the property Organize the building's massing to step down and work with the gradient, rather than creating an artificially flat building pad with abrupt retaining walls (Note refer to City's Slope Ordinance for restrictions on slopes greater than 25%) Inappropnate clearing the site using cut and fill and retaining walls Guideline #8 When retaining walls are necessary, minimzze their impact Design of retaining walls should minimize grade change by creating gradual steps or tiers Consider the form and material of existing walls in the neighborhood, especially where visually prominent (such as along the boulevard and street frontage) Use landscaping to soften and minimize visual impact Guideline #9 Preserve significant trees The design and sitmg of the building should consider existing trees on site and immediately adjacent Consider the tree canopy and root zone, and avoid excessive removal of topsoil from building site Consider permeable materials for paths and driveways in sensitive areas Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 15 Design Guidelines Building and Site Most homes in the Conservation District were ongmaJ built without garages Often, detached garages were added m the back yards, with the hous ade emphasized at the street front Garage and driveway location and design characte as ortant impact on site, building design and compatibility with the neighborhood Special co )deration should be given to size, mass and location of the garage m new construction, and its relationship to the building and the immediate streetscape Appropriate Recessed h age 't played emphasizing house at stre Appropriate Garage massing design and details relate strongly with house Guideline # 10 Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns Because of the impact garage location has on streetscape and building massing, consider existing neighborhood garage/ — building/site relationships in new infill site and building design Garage design should relate strongly to the main structure Inappropnate Garage dominated snout house Inappropnate Garage form unrelated to house Guideline # 11 Minimize garage impact on new structure massmg and street front Design the garage to set back and defer to the main building massing Consider tandem garages, or side -loaded or backyard garages - where site permits Avoid oversized garages that dominate the site and street frontage on narrower lots Consider dormers, windows and other design elements to help break up blank garage roof forms or walls Minimize driveway paving area Stillwater Conservation District 16 Design Guidelmes Design Guidelines Building and Site Many areas within the Conservation District have bui gs that are relatively consistent in proportion to their site size This proportion of buil'g to site contributes to a sense of unity on the block, and is related to Guideline # 1' nppropnate Abrupt chang4 of se Appropnate Maintains scale/pattem of neighborhood Guideline # 12 The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property Consider the open space around a structure, and how it relates to the pattern of the neighborhood Provide enough space to allow for sunlight and air, enhance privacy, and preserve the character of the neighborhood Inappropriate Abrupt change of scale Appropriate Maintains scale/pattern of neighborhood By using less than the allowed maximum lot coverage, and by varying the building footprint withm the required setbacks, a more interesting structure can be created, with a variety of outdoor spaces Maximizing lot coverage and building out to setbacks can result in a structure of inappropriate bulk and mass, relative to the streetscape Stillwater Conservation Distnct Design Guidelines 17 Design Guidelines Building and Site Front porches are generally desirable design elements uti ew structures Front porch elements are found on many of the District's homes, both large an small, helping provide a transition from the public street to the private realm of the hou� e .'Po`t?shes help break down the scale of a front facade, and encourage mteradtion between the street a cl4i use Guideline #13 Consider front porch elements in the design of infi l structures Part of the rh e existing streetscape may include, ont poi elements, including open or enc�a story porches or minimally, entra`ite orticos New infill structures should reflect the pattern of the neighborhood and adjacent structures with respect to porch elements and design Guideline #14 Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building Accessory buildings (including garages) should strongly relate to the main building design, including roof pitch, windows, trim details and materials This relationship increases in importance with the visibility of the accessory building from the street Accessory dwelling units, where allowed, promote affordable housing Accessory dwelling units, where allowed, can promote affordable housing 18 Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Guideline # 15 Design and detail new construchon a four-sided architecture Four-sided architecture mean Y , tains the building's style, design and d it o a s, not just the front facade I - , ' izes that all sides of a house are visible air ect the neighborhood, especially those sites a jacent Four-sided architecture, regardless of style, is also more authentic bz 4ng a character that is more consiste withik character of existing four-4 ed dg ign in the neighborhood Roof forms, location and style of window openings, siding materials and texture, trim and detailing all play a role in creating consistent, honest, four-sided design Building and Site Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 19 Design Gui lines Architectural iittaiis Some architectural details and building elements can have a strong effect on the perceived compatibility of a house with the streetscape Although building massing, setbacks, and height may have a primary role, the careful use of details, materials, color and lighting can also help the new structure's fit m the neighborhood Appropnate Guideline #16 The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and chRter to the houses of the streetsca Wmdow and door placeme ortions, and size can affect a buildmg's coin b ,lity with adjacent structures If the houses on the street tend to have a consistent vertical or horizontal emphasis in their m ents, this should be incorporated, the nee�`�t ructure design Guideline # 17 Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context Building facades should provide visual interest and a sense of human scale Door and window proportions should relate to the style of the building, and facade design and detail should be consistent in all elevations of the structure (see Guideline #15) Tall narrow window openings are appropriate with some traditional styles of architecture, while larger openings may fit more contemporary styles Avoid large area of blank walls, disproportionate gables sizes or shapes, minimal detailing Features such as bay windows, bump -outs, dormers, and masonry chimneys Tali help add detail and enliven facades 20 Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelmes Design Guidelines Architectural Details A creative use of architectural details is encouraged trip w construction Details that develop and support the architectural style of the house will enrich the appearance of the house and help its fit with traditionally detailed homes in the neighW:1 ockd Appropriate / 11.111111k ='!1 _ 11= -if =!t1 Ell P. 11= Appropriate Guideline #18 Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style Architectural details, such as columns, brackets, rails, window, door and corner trim, watertable and horizontal banding, frieze and fascia boards can greatly affect a building's design and compatibility with adjacent structures An absence of detail, especially in traditional styles, conveys a sense of cheapness or lack of authenticity Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelmes 21 Design Guidelmes Architectural Details Materials usage, texture and color also affect important role m developing the architectural within the streetscape and neighborhood the appear' ce of a new structure and can play an style, an whether the new building fits well Lap siding Board and batten siding Guideline # 19 In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and t[erP litionship to other buildings l;the nei "borhood Developing a• ati ship of building materials to prey al ng materials of the streetscape can help unify old and new structures of the neighborhood Traditonal matenals may mclude stucco, stone, bnck, and horizontal, board and batten, and shingle siding The=use=of=natural=materials,=rather=than simulated, is preferred Color, though a matter of personal choice, should complement the structure and streetscape For traditional styles, consider historic color palettes — - - Shingle sided gable Metal roofs Guideline #20 Use masonry and stone authentically Masonry and stone materials, especially thin - veneer types, should be used carefully, and in an authentic way Their primary use as a foundation element relates well to the traditional use of local limestone and brick in historic Stillwater structures A secondary use may be enclosing exterior chimney massing, starting from the grade up When masonry and stone is used as cladding for wall elements, care should be taken to define=building=mass=elements=with--it, typically terminating it at inside corners Avoid its use on single wall planes ending on outside corners, which creates an artificial, applied effect 22 Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Good Neighbor Considerations Many of the design guidelines presented here are base n the simple goal of helping a new tnfill project be a "good neighbor " to adjacent existing hous and neighborhood In addition to visual design compatibility, other considerations shiridadressed, including maintaining privacy, access to views, light and air, and drainage issues Guideline #21 Locate taller porti,s minimize obstruct>< adjacent yards and rooms Guideline ##2` Consider and size of ne "Aid gs to sunlight to ews in placement mg elements Guideline #23 Windows, balconies and decks should be located to respect privacy of neighboring properties Guideline #24 Minimize the impact of exterior lighting on adjacent properties Use recessed downhght fixtures or shields Avoid floodlights and non- shielded point source hghts Use motion sensors and timers to control fixtures Guideline #25 Consider using landscape elements and fences to buffer views and maintain privacy between properties Guideline #26 Design grading and impervious surface drainage to minimize water run-off impact on neighboring properties Guideline #27 Contain debris and respect noise restrictions during construction Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelmes 23 Design Guidelines Summary The applicant submitting for new construction infill pry3te�cts is encouraged to begin the process early, meeting with planning staff to better understandlhe concerns and questions that may be raised during the review process These Design Guidelines are intended to provide background on the special nature of the Conservation District, and a common basis and framework for evaluating proposed designs The Design Review Process is mtended to help th pplicant understand the Design Guidelines, improve the quality of design, and provideja;procIs in which concerns of neighbors and those affected by the infill can be heard `} The Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines are by intent not mandatory requirements, they need consideration and interpretation in the context of each site's unique circumstances Guidelines alone c t�nre good design, at best they can provide general design direction and intent, introd�, g' +*points for discussion during the design process Stillwater is a unique city, defined by a+imbination of natural features, neighborhoods and streetscapes that showcase a rich architectural heritage The Stillwater Conservation District is intended to preserve somepf the character and features that make our town so memorable fi ,17 Stillwater Conservation District 24 Design Guidelines Design Guidelines Resources Death of a Dream Classic Minnesota Farmhouses 1y William Gabler e Guide to the Architecture of Minnesota by Davidebhai and Tom Martinson Minnesota Houses by Roger Kennedy A Field Guide to American Houses by Vir a ad Lee McAlester The Old House Journal (Published bi-montii Main Street, Gloucester, MA 01930 Traditional Building (Published bi-monthly) 69A 7th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11217 Preservation Brief Series For those interested in preserving t er rucfures, The US Department of Interior publishes over forty Preservation Briefs on many asper,,t of buildmg conservation These are available online w at wwcr nps gov/hps/tps/briefs/presbrm htm DiscovertnR the History of7Your House and Your Neighborhood, by Betsy J Green, 2002 ,t; Draftini a House Histry,Wy Barbra Bezat, 1979 4q�1 House Histories a Guide to Tracing the Genealogy of Your Home, by Sally Light, 1989 Washtnoon unrrifistortcal Society PO Box 167_Z. 602 Main Streeitorin� Stillwater, MN 550$/v Telephone (651) 439 5956 WCHS has a significant research collection on Stillwater and Washington County The research library is located in the Carriage House of the Warden's House Museum Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 25 Stillwater Conservation District Map CONSERVATION DISTRICT Stillwater Conservation District 26 Design Guidelines Stillwater Neighborhood Architectural Survey Map STILLWATER NEICiIIBOR11OOD HISTORIC ARCIIITECTURAL SURVEYS A DUTCIITOWN ADDITION 13 CARLI AND 4CIIULENBURGADDITION C STAPLES AND MAYS ADDITION D NORTII HILL (ORIGINAL TOWN) E (IREELEY ADDITION F SOUTIII!ILL 0 I IOLCOMBE S ADDITION 11 WEST IIALF OF THE CIRJRCI!ILL, NELSON SLAUGHTER ADDITION I EAST IIALF OF CIRJRCIOLL NELSON SLAUGHTER ADDITION 1 'JERSEY STAPLES ADDITION Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelmes 27 Design Review Application and Checklist (p 1 of 2) This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form Contact Stillwater City Planning Office 651-430-8821 City Hall 216 N 4th St Stillwater, MN 55082 www ci stillwater mn us Project Address and Neighborhood 5 Prevailing Garage Location pattern in your neighborhood 1 ❑ Neighborhood Architectural Styles Vernacular Queen Anne Greek Revival American Foursquare Italianate Gothic Second Empire Stick 2 Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback Prevailing setback on block (est) Average setback on block (est) Proposed new house setback 3 Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1, 1-1/2, or 2 s high9 Stories-1/2 House on nght ❑ House on left ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on bloc ❑ ❑ Prevailing blocs ❑ oppose ❑ Proposed new �❑ ❑ 2 ❑ 4 Prevailing Front Fort pattern in your neighborhood House on right House on left House to rear Prevailmg on block Prevailing opposite block Proposed new house Notes Front Porch ❑ None House on right House on left House to rear Prev Pre Pri Front Garage g on block ❑ g opposite block ❑ w house ❑ Rear Side Garage Garage ❑ ❑ O 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ 6 Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood se on right Ho ise on left House to rear Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailmg opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ 1 stall 2 stall Garage Garage O ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 3 stall Garage 7 Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house' 8 if the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design Character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighborhood and streetscape9_ Stillwater Conservation District 28 Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist (p 2 of 2) 9 Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property' ❑ Structure sited parallel to slope ❑ Building deigned to reduce cut and fill (minimized retaining walls) ❑ Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes 10 Are there significant trees on the property' Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction' ❑ Types of trees ❑ Heights ❑ Trunk dram Notes Good Neighbor Considered n� SK 1 Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunlight in adjacent yards, patios or rooms' House to right House to left House to rear Notes How will you mitigate any negative sunlight impacts on neighbors' ❑ Locate structure on lot to minimize impact ❑ Adjust building height, or portions of building, to minimize impact ❑ Other 2 Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy' House to right House to left House to rear Notes How; it itigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? ❑ Offset/locate windows to reduce impact ▪ Use obscure glass in window ❑ Locate balconies to minimize impact At ❑/ Use landscaping elements for screening Other 3 How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors' ❑ Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property ❑ Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property ❑ Other To be included with this Application and Checklist ❑ Site Plan mclude location of proposed buildmg(s) on property, property lines, street/sidewalk location and approximate location of adjacent structures Indicate proposed outdoor deck/patio and landscaping features ❑ Building Plan ❑ Buildmg Elevations indicate building height, windows, matenals, and color on all elevations Indicate proposed exterior lighting Regular Planning Department Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelmes 29 Design Guidelines Acknowledgements Stillwater City Council • Jay Kimble, Mayor • Ken Harycki • Dave Junker ▪ Wally Milbrandt • Mike Pohlena Infi11 Design Guidelines Subcommittee • Paul Teske (Chair) • Bob Gag ▪ Jeff Johnson • Dave Peroceshi • Roger Tomten Heritage Preservation Commission • Howard Lieberman (Chair) • Phil Eastwood • Jeff Johnson • Brent Peterson • Roger Tomten Stillwater Plannmg Commission • Robert Gag (Chair) • David Junker (Council 0 • Gregg Carlsen d' ■ Mike Dahlquist • David Middleton • David Peroceschi • Paul Teske • Jerry Turnquist • Suzanne Bo. Stillwater City St fi� ■ — Steve Russell, Duector_of_Commumty Development Consultants ■ Don Empson, Empson Archives • Brian Larson, AIA, Larson Brenner Architects Credits • Minnesota State Preservation Office • Rivertown Restoration 6 Stillwater Conservation Distri ct 30 Design Guidelmes i; L s t Memorandum To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date December 7, 2005 Subject Downtown Height Regulations Last Spring after considering the Lofts and Terra Springs Building No 5 North Main Street projects, the Planning Commission reviewed the City's height standards The Downtown is unique in that much of the Downtown Area east of Main Street is in the Flood Plain and new buildings must be elevated to accommodate possible flood conditions Currently height standards for the Central Business District are Height of Buildings Maximum 4 stories 50 feet Minimum 2 stories 25 feet Infill Buildings within 10% of adjacent building For vacant lots with adjacent buildings (next to) an existing building, the standard relates the new building to the height of the adjacent building to fit the new building into the character of the streetscape or site This standard may need to be defined further to clarify its application Based on the physical conditions of the Downtown and Central Business District, some sites can better accommodate tall buildings without adversely impacting views or the character of the site or area while other sites are more sensitive to tall buildings (next to river or Lowell Park) The attached Map No 1 shows area sensitivity to height The areas along the St Croix River and Lowell Park are very sensitive The area between the Lowell Park or old Burlington Northern Railroad right of way and Water Street is highly sensitive The Main Street corridor from Water to Second Streets is dominated with 2 story buildings and is moderately sensitive The block area west of Second Street and east of Third Street has low sensitivity because of its location at the base of the hill and the rising land elevation to Third Street Currently, there is one height standard for the entire Downtown area Based on height sensitivity and to preserve historic character, it is recommended that a height overlay district be established that relates the allowed height of buildings to the site location within the Downtown A draft proposed height overlay district is presented as Map 2* If the Planning Commission feels this more detailed consideration of height is appropriate and needed to safeguard the historic character of Downtown, a height overall zoning district can be prepared fro public hearing Recommendation Consideration of height review and direction regarding ordinance revision Attachments Height Maps *For the Downtown it is recommended that height be measured from the front street level rather the average finished grade elevation 8 I I Z- W 422 711en `, 610 , .„ _ _____ram I }-1 W r vi �Y _ 703 60 QAI ve,, R2OW R19W 1k 661 �18 21O 422TS cL t'*J - � k1 A. 107 1 516�110 ' I 50, l Z ` p 11C 1 -- 778N 4• 12 N 510 p �' 1 RRV SSR��f O 410 , m vK �U o ASS CHE , ri P. 0i ,i9 402 ��,. iT \ N. A1,\c ` \� Na 410 ff Z' �q\ tijt'i �. azzw Rzlw nry R2ow 40 � �' sc, 1 115 �� 323 318 1312, \ 15 _ N. ' 105 , ` `6 `� 1 Vicinity Map \ -308 ' � �: �' 210 225 'i O ~ 0 � 1251 \ 24 •, 2J1 ` " 73 23T �� ` , \.... 232 • �1 Rip.Y• ' 15 .li •� �i1 1 oraL sVE,, . 21 01✓ v�COMM P 5 Gre--- ` \215 214\AJ 1• o ! / \ �r. 123_, <, 103 iIire, gl (/'t (� \rt s \ (P 1 `` no o, : EO .a \N�R -- /" pI ---A0 S a�i06 `;3) h01 p \ .• ,8 110 3 ca ,1 19 • ► i V 107 201I c 10 ; 1 i . 102\ O 200 > 1 SS MYR i, �• 1�% \\ SS GHSS S Y4 i ` 'ilz V"• 209`, �r �' `� 1 --�eT 0 414 �i , \a� 7 -\ 11, 150_. a\ �`S .� N �\ , \S �,2 Q 221 1220 Se�.1 ~r m esS GHE \ 208 i\O7.-1 -.. �30� 205 `"li9 \ \ �� �i 225 - \ -\"218L \ , �� 30'f\ i .4% 7 A •---1--,•��/./a - 208 �\ 1,0 i EO o ta�\ •" �• 326 r es � � n 7 fie\ 2 2N0 \220 SSRe5S 1 302 ca 301 �,\ ,2 324 L�V6 -n 114 �- 310 � - `�\ v 219\ \wi. C. , -f�2_ �� -/ 1 g� O xit\ --- - 1-te - '\\3:--- t cael ._ a-1 i 0 N ' 30& ESS, 404n �, 11 Q' \ 437,930 l 44g1 . \ a m� % .: nay , _ aoa `„fir ' T 416- " ' - y Se'tn 501 \`_ ° �, f ` 407 Oy\ 51 , • \ Sple In Feet Wow, renal comp] . °eV reOrod.r.o ...I mores Ins M°a~ es us,r, Location Map ; EES t 509 6 y 51 , i� Y O 1 1 �� __- SSR \ '�o ^� 1 424 cote \ 21� a 18 .¢S `�9 \ 16" �517\ 322 6 \ Sean W .m a c w o ffoc cron.msl we �. m WOcn 5.00 Nm.m current M" Doom., 1.0 y 805 GI 422 ' 711 __ - _ - --„/ ,-, it --- -1-01\ �" 5 1 -Ft vJ 4- y - � R , �� / V fy a2ow621 210 33 I II f ' s I TT ® I TS� T31N 61 EPS / /520 1 y0� �6 5 0.Q 41116/ 1 771N 731N h w .312 Z /' 2 3 l it 1 oN n0� S 516 r 114.1=1 7/9N ail 719N \518 ''\1 �, N �I 1101 D\ I r . I 501 Z 01 1 �O / _i , 1 1 jjj MN ' neN I / 510 AO N RRY STRR ZO 410 -' ; �f 5/ 120-, �^ V e om '01 `/ / • . 727N eckS� GHR 1 ' / ,, j m r -1 w� 9 402 ' �,OIL' i \ \ 13 1'14 \ 13 /- r V (4 BM, �1w Bow ` \ AA RRR M Ail ... - c\ EA3T�, 115 i -.1\vi l��'i, (RRR� 1 3 g� 6 318 319 /! `,� 315 , 1/t/,/TI/V t+ �`� 1 \c312 �\ 105' 3 - Vicinity Map p 23 - ��` L. 232 . 221 \ \ , ARV• = 25 - 11 `. -v 1, _ r '409 215�\ 21i 20�mpr vaa1o.MRRG1 ^Pit- • % Ge ,o l / I \ . / 1� �o� it0. •mot R;<�06 '�® 204 G +`, (g % 5okee- n,•t �Ag'i�yd� c0 i`" 1 1. �F,'�,� ��i� 6 Tt- 102‘ %'"1f�L i O 200 '"a 132 , ST N® WRSS M� \\�'a .'• E�S�NNR 209 • '•'� ' � I ' 1 0 414 \N\.- 7- - ♦ l 1/ �� p, ©� 0 `, w 9 y. 221 \Zs+� - t120 C s P' i 214 . 1,z GNRS � 204 C\1o7% — - '0 . � % es � 119-� \08 = -‘ I`v �: `' 1 14 . 225_; zo5 21 1 1 OA 30r ;. `% , t , _/90 zoa ,o ' sooV r OS T 210 220 StRREt 302 0 3011 illi" -n 114` 310 Wawt 1 • \ Y N 21g`1 `�Q}� GG� \.'4Si12 — IPA�� �` / - 4 :2 I, �� C \ 31 SSRR° '8 /` , « f 't �J ` '�)g2�d pPK r�� .�.. `'�q 0 0 ',spa- WRgS y / - G 1.�d, As-- 404 m� / 110 \4371410 ` . 418 \ O -407 (f1 \ 1 519 y j- i= v 1 . , Scale in Feet .�a,weNnpmCooly .mc.. aan wma.,co,.+ rot Location Map 424 ` STRRR \ O .-7-' 1` `� 51 i 8 �aS / ptN — 116 ��` $22 i 5� �,4, ` .mom... ps m: `IAans ." Sw wr rt< N 01 based al AS•00 NmWm cm.. WW1 Ocher 3 2005 . aw.a December 2005 \.1 9 Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director ,'�/ Date December 8, 2005 Subject Neighborhood Conservation Program Background Since August, a Joint Planning Commission/Heritage Preservation Commission Infill Subcommittee has been developing Infill Design Guidelines with the assistance of consultants Brian Larson and Don Epsen The tasks of the subcommittee is to development design guidelines to help preserve the character of our older neighborhoods Beyond infill guidelines a historic residence recognition program and zoning changes will broaden the City's neighborhood conservation effort The Neighborhood Conservation Program will apply the to "Old Stillwater" area surrounding the Downtown (see map) Neighborhood Conservation Program The Neighborhood Conservation Program has three components as described below "Heirloom" Housing Program Conservation District Design Guidelines RB Zoning Ordinance changes Heirloom Housing Program The Heirloom Housing Program is a voluntary program developed by the Heritage Preservation Commission to help highlight exemplary historic houses in the Conservation District The owner of the historic house applied to the City for certification, the Heritage Preservation Commission reviews the request based on eligibility criteria and a list of historic structure provided by the City's Heritage Preservation Commission Heirloom houses could be listed on the City's web site and owners provided a certificate The City's web site would also have links or references to various resource information that can be used to better understand Stillwater history and special historic character Conservation District Design Guidelines The second component of the Neighborhood Conservation Program is the Conservation District Design Guidelines The guidelines are the subject of the Infill Task Force and will be presented at meeting time The guidelines provide direction for building design as related to neighborhood 1 character and streetscape, site/building design and building detail A design permit would be required for new infill development A public hearing would be held by the Heritage Preservation Commission to review project consistency with the guidelines The design guidelines and review process can be considered an educational process to help accomplish "good neighborhood" infill development Zoning Amendments In order to accomplish the goal of preserving the Conservation District Area, some changes are proposed to the Duplex Residential Zoning District regulations The changes provide more flexibility to building setbacks and relate building height and size to lot size The zoning regulations would apply to all development in the RB District not just "infill" development The three components to the Neighborhood Conservation District Program provide a three pronged approach to preserving Stillwater's older neighborhoods through recognition and education, design review and regulations The purpose of the December 14th public meeting is to review the conservation program and in particular the design guidelines and RB zoning changes for possible public hearing at the January 9th Planning Commission meeting Attachments Heirloom Housing Program, Conservation District Map, Draft Design Guidelines and Draft RB Zoning regulation amendments Memorandum To From Date Subject Planning Commission and Heritage Preservation Commission Steve Russell, Community Development Director December 8, 2005 Possible Changes in Development Regulations for Conservation District RB District Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Minimum Yard Setback House Front Side Corner,side Rear Garage Front Corner side Side Current Standards 7,500 sq ft 50' 100' 30' 10' or 10% lot width 30' 25' 30' 30' 5' Rear 5' Maximum Impervious Lot Coverage 30% Maximum Building Coverage 0 Height Lot Size 2 Stories and 27 ft 21/2 Stories and 35 ft <14,999 sq ft > 15,000 sq ft Possible Changes 7,500 sq ft 50' or70' (corner lots') 100' 20' Total 15' two sides 5' minium 20' 25' 30' minium and 10' behind front of house 20' 5' or 3' if garage in rear yard behind house 5' or 3' if garage in rear yard behind house 35% 25% Special Use Permit Multifamily Eliminate multifamily Notes 'For substandard single family residential RA lots in the Conservation District, the RB single family zoning development standards shall be used 'For new corner lots in the Conservation District, the lot width shall be a minimum of 70 feet •ANt 4`14.740P,,,45"'i) SlisSINO.A+1111,Z NtlIV.P4i,VOWV°Who'AVA,t,Ap ;:fekliAke*,x'4, Ar.§ tA, -A.' InlithA.,./74.44140:W-+" ofgslintANA.; AV " INC OPlifillif I I*471,4 10111,1;1"i.: iniiiiiihnlAWrri MUM iiti111011 _ itmigitql111-With... Mk I daitliSil __APIFin.l. , R4 INIMPWIVP11 L 4ar Lt3.:i ME Alilli ;S'ili...., t'UP,i 4-111 Me $141P-11111 MS g \41, urn :+iip iv -4.13C in a PihIS 4 • We would like to propose the following The three crucial parts, for which we would like your permission, are underlined in #1, #3, and #9 Thank you for your consideration Designating Stillwater's Historic Houses The purpose of identifying Stillwater's historic houses is A) To acknowledge and reward those owners who have preserved or restored the integrity of their old houses B) To serve as an educational tool that will inspire and encourage other owners to preserve or restore the integrity of their old houses C ) To preserve the historic neighborhoods —the defining characteristic of Stillwater —to ensure that Stillwater maintains its identity and appeal as a historic river city and tourist destination Because there is little staff or money available, administrative costs have to be kept at a minimum, and any process must require a minimum of time Instead of the traditional method of identifying homes, using plaques and nominations —which require considerable and consistent administrative support and H P C time —we would like to suggest the following method 1 ) We will select homes in Stillwater built between 1843 to 1914, (the period of Stillwater's greatness as a lumbering city) that have a good deal of their original integrity remaining We will choose a variety of house styles, large and small, that are representative of nineteenth century Stillwater We will next identify the owners of these homes and send them a letter requesting their permission to use a photograph of their house along with the address of the house on the city's H P C web site If we have the history of the house that also will be added 2 ) The letter to the homeowner will explain our purpose in using their house, and further inform them that this is simply a way of promoting the preservation of the older houses in Stillwater that there are no financial rewards, no grants or tax reductions, nothing other than the prestige and extra effort of owning and maintaining an historic home in Stillwater 0 'd j43 CD CD '.O �' et 0o g oo v o y w D 0 0 ox CD d ► -cr d F, `C cr ¢ d P CD CD CI) - CD O.• ,_,, CD 0 o"CrCi 0 xarK ¢'`K° 'd CM td O w O Cn 01 CM imm. w 0 nrt *,0 0 c¢ 0 co Cn w w " 0 0 : 0.' R• 51 'd 0 e7 r CDr.3 Cn CD " o Cn c r 0 0 w c0 O. G. c* �, a G O 0 e* ''� eT 00 Cn o Cr CD CD 1•1¢-'� cCDD oq CD $ w o O ,.., RR. °, 0 o w 0 CD CD • 0 its CD 0 00 0 A9 En 00 CAD r R+ CD O 0 'ti,i. w o 0 )-0, St' 'i o o P 0 ° CD a et 0 0 0. cn '-s 0 c f P.'CrD - 0 0 a'� El o w 0 e* 0_ w 0 e~+- '0 0 m P. a 0 w 0- w wd w O el- 0 0 5 p- 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 CD o ey- w co CD c°DD 0 0 a cr 0 0 CO 0 0 CD 0 Cn e* 0 0 0 O et 0 0 0 0 cm) 0 0 Cn 0 E 0 0 0 K 0 m 0 oCD P 0 1- 0 Cr 0 CCD D 0-, 0 0 - w e* CD cfl w o eD 0-1•a D K o" CD II 0 Cn 0 �' Cn 0 CD 0" cn o o o 0 m e 0 0� 0 a 0 0 e* ° " K o 0 Cn 0 c a ,0 0 p, 0 0 m ~' Cn o 0 — w• 1 o cmi- 0 w a o o o 0 Pm. cm 0 cr CD 0 0 0' CD a OCo max; O rn e., w �' 0 o PI O K 0 0 ¢' a o' - Cno� O k o I qC 0 PC10) 0 0 Co 0 CD CDC 0 Cn ee* 0 0 CD 0 < e=t7 CD 0 P.• R' 0 ''d CD pPm 0 G�• ... co e 00 imq Cn R- ew* K w o c 0 `►3 r w 2 1 CD Z P CD CD CD '0 0 CD 0 R. Cn CD m o 0 x 0 Cr. 0 0 'd m '0 "fC1 CD 0 P ►0 0 CD et w CS `d '' 0* o CD �,i CDcD P 0 In-0 • o, �. 2 0 a' o* e Cn 0 c-r w ¢ 0 c w 0 �' 0-. x C 0 0- 0 O carCD 5 0 o 'rFi �. ' 0 coo x o 0 w 5 St- 0- ei- o cn 0'' 5 C 0" 14 w c CD �'' 0 0 o o 5 CD CP:J'� p. 0 .s Cn c(14 CD 0D K 0 r, et a, CD O �J O n a a 0 0 c o P it c cn ~' P o w o w 0 Id w K 0 0 0 5 � 0 P0 a cw-r cti c*'d 0 O 0 x O O CPw o ¢'� cn o o 0- cr. CD CD Cncn - e�- Cn CD 0 w et ¢w• 0 cp) b car CD 'd o CD o.5 eT e* 0 o im.g0 hCi CD 0 CD CD O ~ a. cxpc- n K 0 a. -0 0 e x� d o w 0 Cn o w R• r DRAFT Application Letter for "Heirloom House" Designation (to be on the web site) I would like to have the Heritage Preservation Commission of Stillwater consider my house for designation on its web site as a Heirloom House of Stillwater I understand there is no financial compensation for this designation Name Address Do you know the history of your home9 Why do you think your house should be included on the web site as a Heirloom House9 Please submit this form to the Heritage Preservation Commission, (address,) etc Thank you for your interest in our program If you would like to be present at the discussion of your application, please check here and we will notify you If you have questions, please contact (Sue or me9) at telephone/e mail N ,,,.........,...................-•----- STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 s Phone (651) 439-8833 Fax (651) 430-9331 ORIGINAL SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET 0 30 SCALE IN FEET L/ 60 4 CERTIFICATEOF S UR VEYFoIZ, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. MINOR SUBDIVISION LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING U 50 � oENGINEERING A � o GIMMIDDLETON PARCEL A: The North Ten (10) feet of Lot Thirty-seven (37); Lot Thirty-eight (38); and all that part of Lot Four (4), lying westerly of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and fifty (150) feet distant Westerly from the East line ofBlock Seven (7) and south ofa line parallel with and Two hundred and Eighty-three (283) feet Southerly from the North line ofBlock Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May 21, 1878, according to the plat thereof PARCEL B: Lot Thirty-seven (37), except the North Ten (10) feet thereof, The North Fifteen (15) feet of Lot Thirty-six (36); and all that part of Lot Five (5), lying westerly of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and fifty (150) feet distant Westerly from the Fast line ofBlock Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May 21, 1878, according to the plat thereof. PARCEL C: Lot Thirty-six (36), except the North Fifteen (15) feet thereof; The North Twenty (20) feet of Lot Thirty-five (35); and all that part of Lot Six (6), lying westerly of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and fifty (150) feet distant Westerly from the Fast line ofBlock Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May 21, 1878, according to the plat thereof. PARCEL D: Lot Thirty-five (35), except the North Twenty (20) feet thereof, Lot Thirty-four (34) except the South Eighteen (18) feet of the West Seventy-five (75) feet; The North Eighteen (18) feet of the East Seventy-five (75) feet ofLotT rty=threern-A1Ti71at LMSeP' r(7), lying westerly off`t line drawn parallel with and One hundred ant/lift-0-50) fe td ant Westerly from the Fast line ofBlock Seven (7)• The West 68 feet of Lots Eight (8), Nine (9) and Ten (10), Block Seven (7), CARL1 and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May21, 1878, according to the plat thereof. r_- ^7` 1 )/1/\/ A I / L_. .� I • 6o liI \ lJl/\ / 1 V L_. -7 I I A/ A Tr-1) A I L_. 60 I IL_L_ V V /-1 / L_l \ '-1 V L_. C� 60 10 - N 83'11'31"1 N 89'21'31" E ttl 150.0 A Li `t Litt 150.0 150.00 150.00 1N �' •a 447 �� t. ii '' D 37800 SQ. FT 72 75.0 Satre '"1r v 0I co cc H 0 if?' EA TETRiv_.: TH 1 ' 100.38'28"W 22.09 L- 48 / l 1tJ LEGEND DENOTES J¢ INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "FREEMAN LS 16989", UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT, SIZE AND MARKINGS AS INDICATED EXISTING DRAINAGE NOTES 1) ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF N. BROADWAY AVE. WHICH BEARS N 00'38'20" W Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Minimum Lot Coverage Minimum Yard Requirements Front Side Rear Blufiline Setback 7,500 sq. ft. 50 feet 100 feet 30 percent 30 ft 10 ft. or 10 percent of lot width 25 ft: 40IL TAKEN FROM THE CITY OF STILLWATERS ZONING CODE 195 (/) v M Z I • E. Sll 6 239 —1 NE OF THE BLOCK 7 T68FEET OF VICINITY MAP SEC. 21, T3ON, R2OW (i) (n < LLWATE AV 0 v c N NOT TO SCALE 1 '1 TE c X O U . Map No. 05-137 D MIDDLETON N N ORIGINAL SCALE 1 INCH = 30 FEET 15 3'0 SCALE IN FEET 60 CERTIFICATEOF S UR VEYFoIz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. MINORSUBDIVISION LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING ♦ ENGINEERING RTH !1' T � .f MIDDLETON � � � � wE S56TII,LWATERMINNESOTA MEMORIAL AVENUE �5 082 PARCEL A: The North Ten (10) feet of Lot Thirty-seven (37); Lot Thirty-eight (38); and all that part of Lot Four (4), lying westerly of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and filly (150) feet distant Westerly from the East line of Block Seven (7) and south ofa line parallel with and Two hundred and Eighty-three (283) feet Southerly from the North line ofBlock Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May 21, 1878, according to the plat thereof PARCEL B: Lot Thirty-seven (37), except the North Ten (10) feet thereof, The North Fifteen (15) feet of Lot Thirty-six (36); and all that part of Lot Five (5), lying westerly of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and fifty (150) feet distant Westerly from the East lme of Block Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May 21, 1878, according to the plat thereof. PARCEL C: Lot Thirty-six (36), except the North Fifteen (15) feet thereof, The North Twenty (20) feet of Lot Thirty-five (35); and all that part of Lot Six (6), lying westerly of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and filly (150) feet distant Westerly from the East line of Block Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May 21, 1878, according to the plat thereof. PARCEL D: Lot Thirty-five (35), except the North Twenty (20) feet thereof, Lot Thirty-four (34) except the South Eighteen (18) feet of the West Seventy-five (75) feet; The North Eighteen (18) feet of the Fast Seventy-five (75y feeruf Lut Thu ty-thi ce (33); -Afl that part ofLot Beven (7), lying westerly -of the line drawn parallel with and One hundred and -fifty (150) feat -distant Westerly from the East line ofBlock Seven (7); The West 68 feet of Lots Eight (8), Nine (9) and Ten (10), Block Seven (7), CARLI and SCHULENBERG'S ADDITION to STILLWATER, Minnesota as amended by Myron Shepherd's perfected plat of the City of Stillwater, dated May21, 1878, according to the plat thereof. • PROPOSEfJ �%Stt,-F ._' ELEV 831 • Phone (651) 439-8833 Fax (651) 430-9331 LEGEND 0 DENOTES J¢ INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "FREEMAN LS 16989", UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT, SIZE AND MARKINGS AS INDICATED EXISTING DRAINAGE NOTES 1) ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF N. BROADWAY AVE. WHICH BEARS N 0018'20" W Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Minimum Lot Coverage Minimum Yard Requirements Front Side Rear Bluffline Setback 7,500 sq. ft. 50 feet 100 feet 30 percent 30 ft. 10 ft. or 10 percent of lot width 25 ft. 40t TAKEN FROM THE CITY OF STILLWATERS ZONING CODE NOT TO SCALE Map No. 05-137 D MIDDLETON