Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-09-12 CPC Packet�►+ �Illwater. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, September 12, 2005 at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA 1 Case No SUB/V/05-41 A request for a subdivision of one lot of 14,982 square feet into two lots of 7,491 square feet each and a variance to the lot size regulations (7,500 square feet required) in the RB, Duplex Residential District at 203 St Croix Avenue Jeff and Heather Swanson, applicant (continued from the August 8, 2005 meeting) 2 Case No ZAT/05-01 A zoning text amendment requiring two or more adjacent lots that do not meet lot width or size requirements to be combined (merged) to meet district zoning requirements City of Stillwater, applicant (continued from the August 8, 2005 meeting) 3 Case No SUP/05-43 A special use permit for live entertainment at Northern Vineyard Winery located at 223 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District Robin Partch, applicant (continued from the August 8, 2005 meeting) 4 Case No V/05-49 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 15 feet requested) for the construction of a 6' x 12' front entry located at 1119 N 3rd Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Street David and Jaime Rorabeck, applicants 5 Case No SUP/05-51 A home occupation special use permit for a home photography business located at 720 South Second Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District John and Aileen Krozos, applicants 6 Case No V/05-52 A variance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 4 feet requested) for the replacement of an existing porch located at 915 6th Avenue South in the RB, Two Family Residential District Marek and Amy Mino, applicants 7 Case No SUB/V/05-54 A subdivision of a 22,500 square foot lot into two Tots, Lot A - 10,000 square feet with an existing residence and Lot B- 3,700 square feet developable with a variance to the developable lot area (10,000 square feet required) for the construction of a residence with shared driveway access from North Fifth Street located at 1913 North Fifth Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District Scott Junker, applicant 8 Case No SUB/05-55 A resubdivision of Lot 2, BIk1 Cochrane's Long Lake Addition into two lots Parcel A - 22,405 square feet (new lot) and Parcel B - 46,972 square feet (existing house) located at 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue in the LR, Lakeshore Residential District Richard and Leah Peterson, applicants Other Items Update Infill Design Review CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430 8800 City of Stillwater Planning Commission August 8, 2005 Present Robert Gag, chairman, Gregg Carlsen, Mike Dahlquist, David Junker, Dave Middleton, David Peroceschi, Paul Teske, Jerry Turnquist and Darwin Wald Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Mr Gag called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Wald, seconded by Mr Teske, moved approval of the minutes of July 8, 2005 Motion passed unanimously Case No SUB/V/05-41 A request for a subdivision of one lot of 14,982 square feet into two lots of 7,491 square feet in the RB, Duplex Residential Distnct at 203 St Croix Ave John Harvey, applicant Mr Russell said the property in question has been sold and the applicant is requesting a continuation of this case Mr Dahlquist asked if there was a time restnction for considering the case Mr Russell said this is now a new case, and the City could request an additional 60 days for action Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Dahlquist, moved to continue this case, with another 60 days for consideration Motion passed unanimously Don Empson, an interested resident, asked if affected property owners would be renotified when the Planning Commission hears the case While not required, it was the Commission's consensus that property owners receive another notification Case No ZAT/05-01 A zoning text amendment requiring two or more adjacent lots that do not meet lot width or size requirement be combined to meet district zoning requirements City of Stillwater, applicant Mr Russell explained that the amendment would require two or more substandard lots under one ownership be combined for development purposes He said the amendment will give the City more control and should tend to reduce the number of vanance requests for substandard lots He noted such a requirement currently is in effect in the Shoreland Distnct Mr Teske asked how the City would enforce the requirement and whether affected property owners would be notified of the change Mr Middleton suggested the requirement might require a title change and the properties would need to be re -recorded Mr Russell said the requirement only would be enforced if a property owner applied for a vanance for a subdivision There was a question about how many properties are affected Mr Russell said he was unsure of the number but suggested the matter could be continued and an inventory completed Mr Junker, seconded by Mr Tumquist, moved to continue this case Members asked for a legal clanfication of some of the verbiage as well as City responsibility for notification and enforcement Motion to continue passed unanimously 1 City of Stillwater Planning Commission August 8, 2005 Case No V/05-42 A variance to the parking regulations (96 required, 69 proposed) for a 1,330 square foot expansion of a restaurant at 1491 Stillwater Blvd in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Gary Sukopp, applicant Mr Sukopp was present He said he and his wife have the opportunity to expand their business into the adjacent space The additional space will be used for storage, kitchen and locker space and for 3 or 4 additional Hibachi tables that will feature Teppanyaki cooking He said he had done an inventory of parking spaces, included in his application, which shows there are quite a few spaces available dunng the evening hours, the Teppanyaki dining would only be offered dunng the evening, he said He also pointed out the space in question had previously been proposed, and approved, for a new restaurant Mr Middleton asked how many additional guests could be accommodated Mr Sukopp said currently the restaurant can seat 36 guests when completely full, the addition has the potential to accommodate 26 more people Mr Turnquist moved approval of the vanance request noting that parking is no problem currently and the Commission had previously discussed a condition that no additional restaurants be allowed in the center Mr Teske seconded the motion Mr Dahlquist said he voted against a restaurant use in the past, but said he did not think the expansion of the existing restaurant would greatly impact the parking situation Mr Dahlquist questioned whether the owner of the property had complied with a condition regarding landscaping Mr Russell said that condition had not yet been met Mr Turnquist pointed out the landscaping is the responsibility of the owner, not this tenant Motion for approval passed unanimously Case No SUP/05-43 A special use permit for live entertainment at Northern Vineyard Winery at 223 N Main St in the CBD, Central Business Distnct Robin Partch, applicant The applicant was not present Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Peroceschi, moved approval of the special use permit Mr Junker said he thought the applicant should be present and said just because the use has been going on for a year and a half was no excuse to give a rubber stamp approval Mr Teske said he thought the use was good for the community and had been working without a lot of complaints Mr Dahlquist suggested tabling the request until the next meeting Mr Middleton withdrew his motion Mr Turnquist, seconded by Mr Teske, moved to table this case until the September meeting Motion passed 8-1, with Mr Peroceschi voting no Case No V/05-44 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 19 feet requested) and side yard setback (10 feet required, 5 feet requested) for construction of a covered porch at 305 Stillwater Ave in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct David Yadgir, applicant Mr Yadgir was present He explained that he and his wife are restonng the home and want to construct as original as possible a porch across the front of the home, a 19`h century Itahanate He provided a letter signed by neighbors who supported the plans Mr Carlsen said he thought the proposed porch would help the design and pull the parts of the house together and moved 2 City of Stillwater Planning Commission August 8, 2005 approval of the vanance as conditioned Mr Wald seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/05-46 A variance to the tree preservation ordinance for the subdivision of two lots into 23 lots with an existing building at 1749 S Greeley St in the BP -I, Business Park Industnal District Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, applicant Case No SUB/05-45 A subdivision of two lots into 23 lots with one existing building and 21 new office lots at 1749 S Greeley St in the BP -I, Business Park Industnal District Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, applicant Present were Mike Black and Enc Ogren, representing the owners of the property in question Mr Ogren noted his family has owned the property for 25 years He said the property must be graded to accomplish the proposed development and trees removed Most of the trees are older white pine, he said According to the City's tree preservation ordinance, a tree inventory would need to be completed at a cost of as much as $5,000 Rather than pay someone to "count trees," he said they would rather pay that money to the City of Stillwater for its parks department or other use the City determined He said they plan an aggressive landscaping plan and plan to plant 103 trees around the penmeter and 92 in the center of the property Mr Russell said a tree inventory is needed to determine a starting point, and noted that the tree preservation ordinance is over and above any landscape plan requirements Mr Ogren also noted that this property is basically landlocked and not visible to the public Ruth Peterson, 812 Rainbow Court, said removal of the trees will have a significant impact, refemng to property values and wildlife Gail Sommerfelt, Everett Dnve, asked about the types and sizes of trees that the developer would be planting Mr Black said they are working with a landscape architect and a vanety of trees, including Northwood maple and white pine, are planned Ms Sommerfelt also asked about the grading expressing a concern about the impact on Bnck Pond Mr Ogren responded that a retaining wall will be constructed and a holding pond created so all runoff will go toward Greeley Street He said they are working with the City engineer regarding grading plans/runoff Glonanne Hatchel, 808 Rainbow Court, said the trees are the main attraction to her property and removal will decrease the property value The residents of 814 Rainbow Court also expressed a concern about the loss of trees and its impact on their landscape and on animal life in the area, as well as the height of the proposed retaining wall Mr Teske, Mr Turnquist and Mr Dahlquist all spoke in favor of abiding by the tree preservation ordinance Mr Dahlquist noted that trees proposed as part of the landscaping plan don't count for replacement trees Mr Junker pointed out that Rainbow Court was all trees before 3 City of Stillwater Planning Commission August 8, 2005 development occurred, and noted there will still be a significant buffer for those houses Mr Russell noted there are some significant oaks close to the property line, which would not be that difficult to preserve Mr Middleton moved to deny the variance to the tree preservation ordinance Mr Turnquist seconded the motion Motion to deny passed 7-2, with Mr Junker and Mr Peroceschi voting no Mr Black reviewed the plans for the business office development, which will look much like a townhouse development, he said The buildings will be residential -looking walkouts Front and rear design elevations of the new buildings were shown The two new buildings on Greeley Street will be two stones and match the bnck of the existing building He said they are working with the engineers on the drainage plan He said the Hentage Preservation Commission suggested some parking spaces be eliminated in order to add more green space and plantings The lighting plan meets the ordinance regarding candle -foot power, and the lighting will be low sodium bulbs, as per the HPC condition of approval Signage will include small 2x2 signs outside each unit with the address and business name, along with a monument sign on Greeley Street There will be two trash enclosures, screened and of back exterior Mr Ogren said according to the staff report there are five issues One issue is that the plan exceeds the allowable impervious surface, by reducing parking spaces and adding green space as recommended by the HPC they will be able to meet that requirement Regarding park dedication requirements, he said they would be willing to work with the Parks Department and meet that requirement He said there also was an issue with slope setbacks He said there are no slopes greater than 50' and therefore the setback does not apply A final issue, he said, is the zoning of the Washington County HRA-owned parcel He said they thought the property was zoned BP -I with a required setback of 75' However, the HRA property is zoned residential with a 50- setback requirement, which they cannot meet Mr Russell suggested that the Commission can't act on the subdivision request until the tree survey and preservation plan are completed Carol Huber, 813 Everett Dnve, said she liked the design but would prefer if the units were scaled back to one story Ms Sommerfelt, Everett Dnve, asked how tall the parking lot fixtures would be and whether lights would be on all night Mr Ogren and Mr Black responded that the fixtures are shoebox, downlit fixtures so the light source is not visible, and there is no foot-candle illumination beyond the property However, they said it might be possible to photo cell the lighting to turn off at a certain time in the evening The resident of 814 Rainbow Court also said height of the units is an issue and expressed a concern about the appearance of the walkouts, which appear as three stories from the rear elevation She also questioned the vacancy rate of office space in Stillwater and asked if the 4 City of Stillwater Planning Commission August 8, 2005 developer considered scaling the project back Mr Ogren noted the height comes down to a matter of economics and said this type of development is what professional people are looking for and stated he has had many calls of interest He also said he would be willing to meet with residents individually to address concerns It was pointed out that the economic viability of a project is not something the Commission considers in its approval process Mr Junker spoke in favor of the project, saying the Ogrens were lifelong residents of Stillwater who want to bnng a quality project to the City Mr Teske agreed that the plans are nice looking, but additional details were needed Mr Middleton suggested the biggest issue is the setback requirement Mr Ogren said meeting the residential setback requirement would jeopardize the project Mr Dahlquist suggested looking are removing some parking, and possibly one unit, to meet the setback, while Mr Peroceschi noted a project redesign was not something that is likely to happen Mr Teske said without the tree survey the Commission does not have all the information necessary to take action Mr Turnquist, seconded by Mr Teske, moved to continue this case pending the tree survey Mr Dahlquist said there were other points he would like to see addressed, including the current alignment of the access from Greeley Street Motion to continue passed 8-0, with Mr Peroceschi not casting a vote Case No SUP/05-47 A special use permit for a 15,000 square foot addition and renovation for Lakeview Hospital at 927 Churchill St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Lakeview Hospital, applicant Curt Geissler, CEO of Lakeview Hospital, was present He said the addition will be used for ICU/CCU space and will result in some additional business, about one patient per day, most of the clients will be treated on an outpatient basis He said the small additional traffic will be far offset by the move of the adjacent Greeley Street Chmc The new addition is expected to open around July 1 of 2006, about the same time that the Greeley Clinic is expected to relocate He noted the addition is within the hospital's existing footprint He said a neighborhood meeting was held to explain the plans, with only one person in attendance Mr Turnquist moved approval as conditioned Mr Teske seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/05-48 A vanance to the fence regulations setback (30 feet required, 6 feet requested) for construction of a fence at 2345 Van Tassel Court in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Michelle St Claire, applicant Ms St Claire was present She showed photos of the property She said the fence would be constructed inside of the existing tree line and 33' from the road She noted the house is located in the middle of the street and not on a corner lot The house abuts two streets The fence will be constructed in the backyard, which is considered a front yard for fence regulations due to the 5 City of Stillwater Planning Commission August 8, 2005 house abutting two streets Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval of the vanance Motion passed unanimously Other items Mr Russell asked for volunteers to serve on the infill design committee Mr Teske and Mr Peroceschi volunteered to serve Mr Junker, seconded by Mr Turnquist, moved to adjourn at 9 45 p m Motion passed unanimously Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 6 Su?)14 f Gc-41 uzo Jim and Elaine Pederson 1106 No Second Street Stillwater, MN 55082 July 19, 2005 Dear Mayor Kimball and Stillwater City Council Members In the spring of 1973 we purchased our present home at 1106 North Second Street It was a great decision and we have enjoyed every year of living here Now we are preparing to downsize a bit and reduce items like snow blowing, grass mowing, gardening and periodic painting of the two buildings on the property We have become aware of an increasing move to subdivide lots, create rental properties where single families have lived for generations and otherwise, in our opinion, alter the historic character of the North Hill Neighborhood In the 32 years we have lived here we have seen countless homes that have been re- habbed, restored, or improved In fact the North Hill is a different place, a better place and a good place because of all the owner improvements that have taken place We hope this trend will continue Mr Richard Moe, the president of the National Trust for Histonc Preservation, and a long time friend of ours, makes a very persuasive case in a classic volume on Histonc Preservation that historic preservation is good economic policy, good for neighborhoods, good for cultural values and a very positive way for families and neighborhoods to help preserve our hentage that all too often seems to in a perceived contest with "progress" We trust that the HPC, the Planning Commission, and the City Council will listen carefully to the concerns of the long time residents of the North Hill as well as the newcomers who want to live here, in part at least, because of the histonc and welcoming atmosphere of this part of histonc Stillwater Thank you for taking the time to hear resident's opinions S cerely, and Elaine �e�,' 0 Pdiwer.) 06 No Second Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Sv61J cDs'-�-F� ?p Rex and Ann Martin 1112 N 2nd Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mayor Kimble and Stillwater City Council Members July 19, 2005 We purchased our present home in 1980 and in the course of the past 25 years we have invested much of our time and resources in restoring a house built in 1880 Our aim in restoration has been to respect the onginal architectural and aesthetic character of the house In fact, a photograph of the upper facade of our home was included in an article, ' Make Stillwater Your New Home," published in the Star -Tribune insert for Summer, 2005, "Stillwater Style " Why do we call your attention to these facts? 1 Because we, like our neighbors, are increasingly aware of requests brought before the City Council to subdivide lots on the North Hill In our view this is an encroachment on the historic character of this neighborhood, which the City Council should be dedicated to preserving Permitting such subdivisions encourages real estate speculators to scalp available properties for short term investments that will yield quick profits without regard for the permanent consequences these subdivisions have on the long-time residents less open space, more crowded yards less long-term commitment to the very properties from which such speculators seek to profit, less of the traditional look and feel of the neighborhood and the larger community 2 Along side of these requests to subdivide lots is another recent phenomenon real estate investors snapping up any property that can be turned into a rental umt at minimum cost for maximum gain In the block on which our home is located, one such investor has purchased two of these properties By his own admission, he will simply take these properties as a tax write-off if he can't rent them, play a waiting game if need be, and re -sell them for a profit as their value increases in the housing market Meanwhile 7 There is nothing illegal about this, we know, but neither this practice nor that of subdividing lots contributes in any way to building a strong neighborhood and maintaining its historic character We therefore ask that the City Council and the Planning Commission, together with the Heritage Preservation Commission, listee► attentively to the views of long time residents on the North Hill who have a great deai`stake in the decisions you will make about the future of our neighborhood n Thank you for listening to us Sincc,re Rex and Ann Martin 1112 N 2nd Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/V/05-41 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 203 St Croix Avenue Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Jeff and Heather Swanson Type of Application Subdivision and Variance Project Description Request to subdivide a 14,982 square foot lot into two lots of 7,491 square feet each (7,500 square feet required) Discussion This subdivision request was previously before the Planning Commission on June 13, 2005 The Planning Commission denied the request at that time No plans for development on the lots were submitted This application was referred back to the Planning Commission for variance review because of lot size At this time, a new applicant has submitted a request for the subdivision Concept development plans show a two story structure with an attached garage on the new lot A new attached garage is shown for the existing residence When the garage is attached to the residence, the garage has the rear yard setback (25 feet) of the primary dwelling Neither of the attached garages meet setback It appears that the proposed building locations preserves many of the large trees on the site Because of the need for a variance, conditions of approval regarding site and building design can be placed on the subdivision Recommendation Denial Finding The request does not meet lot size requirements of the RB Duplex Residential District Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material subm►ttea in connection with any application All supporting matenal (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If app/►cat►on is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with appl►cat►ons Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal penod Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 4013 5k. CRO1t Pwe E Assessor's Parcel Noa/03 O7y30057 (GEO Code) Zoning DistnctR Description of Project tYV ►0 6 )03 St. Clba f Avc niro "bASO CAo* S ' �11 R c e Viiic\%ky1r n -� ;re.L,; - ROe D 10 -t,4 e I - -L,qF "I hereby state the foregoing state ents and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner 3eff.t eA-1-467... Representative Mailing Address 60C1 SVOKik- Sake_€\' Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone S►gnatur� , 51-WD City - State - Zip 51- a15-1333 Telephone No Signature ignature is required) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dlmensions)9l Ix 1u11, Land Area if V°I% S Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal a Accessory —1--- A> Total Building floor area Afrg Z,' square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces Z H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM April 20 2005 MINOR LOT SUBDIVISION FOR: HARVEY WOODRUFF LLC S Was along t Lot 6. D TER, measured ierly lines of said PARCEL B The East Half of Lot 6, Block 1 7, CARLI AND SCHULENBERGS ADDITION TO STILLWATER, Washington County, Minnesota as measured along the northerly and southerly lines of said Lot 6. AREA SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA = 14,982 SQ. FT. PARCEL A AREA = 7,491 SQ. FT. PARCEL B AREA = 7,491 SQ. FT. DUE TO THE FOUND MONUMENTS IN THE FIELD THERE IS A SLIGHT SHORTAGE IN AREA FOR THIS LOT. IT WAS INTENDED TO BE PLATTED AS 1 5,000 SQ.FT. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota. DANIEL�L.�ft Rft RGES License. No. 25718 bate 6-23-05 1 60' R/W F Z 60' R/W FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE AT -- LOT CORNER MARKED STACK 0 0 L_ c9 0 ez 0 5 BITUMINOUS STREET ST. CROIX AVE: E. 4T890 19'446;rE 74.97 iv I T 16.4vti 0� 8.5 N EXISTING HOUSE 15.8 18.5 PAREL A 0' r (off CO 74.97 `OV Y 1 S r 21.5" EDGE OF BITUMINOUS ,A, 10.00 PLAT 149.94 17.4' EXISTING HOUSE REMOVE GARAGE Z 0.3 c.5 (n01 w m N (Y, rn � 74.97 uJ z J PARCEL B �9 ce a G�J 74.97 x FENCE 1 9.95 n FENCE N89° 19'31 "E 150.00 PLAT G NOTES: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT LOCATED OR SHOWN. EASEMENTS, IF ANY, MAY EXIST. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. <,, r r ) "• 0 , 0 ou oz 0 —X— — f4 FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE AT LOT CORNER 30 • i 60 SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET PROJECT LOCATION: 203 EAST ST. CROIX AVE. STILLWATER, M I N N ESOTA NORTH CATCH BASIN HYDRANT SIGN WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE TELE/ELEC BOX GAS VALVE OVERHEAD WIRES WELL MANHOLE CULVERT GAS METER FENCE CONCRETE • DENOTES FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE p DENOTES SET 1/2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS 25718 Suite #B100 200 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dlt-csls@ mcleodusa .net CORNERSTONE LANE) SURVEYING, INC A c h t cts 1 c EXCELSIOR MN 440 2nd Street 55331 Tel (952) 380 4817 Fax (952) 380 4818 l Dale Mulfinger FAIA Penapal r— I G dmulfinger®salaarc com i www SALAarc com 1 a ol' lb ki% z Z, cttsi X ?At e , V 7 i P T r roj b 1 b -74f- -,; "re''' r ' —k.— f e -1, {L " ' # J. { 4.1•• i t �kr, yw (4 r X } - 11.7 f t� x'F. Y lTf tt� sd y 4 f 1 L r� a1,477, ") --r �a G .1 rr ti ' v t — s ar �+r rti iF " i ciei,�r4,a 1,E o-aI .irr 'rti Tr ' x 't 4'"d_�i i `7 QA9t Rr , c, 'x ,,,,,,-,r ,^K— ,`s- ,.^rt g-lx-ml r1 'jr, s r.. ryI J N �yt",. 0,, i tl r, -;: rp -,\.f k �t 1 tr k k N. y 4" ti r .,f `k ap74'"' 1.1( a' `. iti J_ tFr e 11 l-YJ�!Y t-t1:4 rra t 7�jn'r ,�tia e w�t.1`; ad H'"^iaid trr` 7 c.?¢A,P.v i, m�,,, y I 1 4 t, x F` 3 i` �4- !`1{; " w`(i'a r1 q 1 `., , } '�S`t- t -, r ( 5'",i 7 1 , 4 ri "'YF i SS4 Rr -- lJ 1 f s rt Fi. ti �'' q.� ' -,,1' ! ,: c `+C +''l n �f q' mil-ir_{,„.,„ �� -1 4` rt 1 + tin 1 '.. r r'1 r x�9, It r4 , a o- r,, M1 t 1 9 w ' 1a 1 4 y' u r 1� iA ''' r1 n 1 r1 1 i zti� r dlt��1 -.+.s i-1 ��}- �t ��c��. S c`� 7ti 4- 4ty� T i t'','',.,,,, t J, } 1r + rM ';- � 'Y4 �t�a�c'` l� ! ✓i d 1 �, l a tis r + ��fy-� r.r. 1,, , 1,� d1. 1 1 - IL ��y u 1 p` ?s ' 1u {1 ,' ` .J,4,J s Qs� 5 f -' ; (7'''', r , F I{ t r 11 'r.. 1 J r 4 v r S-1 +k5 ! hf 1 T a7' i f, r?`� a s �k st. }y ,,rlc',V,4) d 1,,4,7.). b,, „.,� 1.f `" %� ' sriyC t } faty� � r r q t g r'".-- c yhi'PIN4 i 1 ,,1� ttv w t 1 w >, �fl 1 � rY ,iK 'khr4 71 W 1 s '� �' t F 1 )c _ jtt > 1y Ta +�t rr`iN 3 � t�1� +'a��l�.p 1 �S� �$ � r4 t�i J yt " ‘it:., t 'i '''':''t, . i � r� v i i �+"��'CtSfi' �ti n f i+ v t� rk # ,,'.^H Gti y}r'1'1 i`4' 3 .9, 1ir 9 F S #1 I , 'sty '7u t '''''‘I �' { Cr % d 11�St. �_f� (" ,� k r� ry �^�1 t rti �S "� h 1 s n.4 �h� J '� 1c' �f ` ��1, f4'� , N+t z `t 44 { 41'S,f� t, o trt, v i µ r,, i 6 f +,f 2e' Y ''f pt: .. ;1.�. f ?�:1 Ir 4Z Lit- V".^ `` ✓� , 7 i t 1 ittF 1� ! t �Y��T' r'p,�`�'' �`� �al 1S rf� ti r k,r f^ 1 '1 1 'E ��`� Ail ' ` 4 yj".t+itA� tt, h t"c� cy, (3 , i it .i 7 L 3 11 ,51, ,r\.j +, ft k� 4 1t 1 ... 3.� �. " p�. 14 S o rt, 1�1 r -r0,. j r =' x V U 4 jr. -t tRa. 1 1 " s i la .(any ` 1 tr. , S. ^ 9 'J.( � tV nr Q+1' 'r `� { s �f e i4` � � S 6 ,r3 ` 1 yY .7 ,I; as 'A,n'..� 1 r' F` s'� ' i lr 1.--,,, i �p Ya '#- �S r`\41''; t fr!'Y r 4n i ++i st,w.. , a.4 C.1 s r r,-;:'- Y' ii7+h v *g & nr1.5- 3i -•n•`� '.i . t c s r�1 �g ,,PH 1 q 14�t jar,, h ' q ff X jr,++�i {J 4 4 t i+ 4Cy 1,.. rs '7 1 h x a rtd it) 44 y + SA klot FA,iY1'n F 4 Y 1 wr11M11 4 irk S�, nt nfh +r , ty,`tnnw r C rare'di,r r Y S 4 Kp �1-b-{ 1"*.'�-��; Wit..... ' 5 4-.4 4 t 9`, 4 4 rr CA4 ar r '5 ,. S- �.}.� S rY I f { r q 7 i -f- r n tE 4J d - r r3 inn .4 r� S�4 r .1.. 4 rub ync°` ter'&x .., ;,t Fcgv , .114.�� 3 Mtk J r{„t1LL'r` �.2 `dV2%�•��y 'Pk r' f' 4 r 4 Y 4 } Y 4, i p t "-a.5 r a4=, -r -". •7 f ''a-'- F r y l (SR---:. ` r 1 4- _ IF�r S� yr" C -4 i, cif �. 4 4rc S� ..i-1. 3 4 Y 1 Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date August 29, 2005 Subject Zoning Amendment Lot Merger No additional information is available on this amendment It is suggested that the item be continued indefinitely until more information can be developed on the occurrence of substandard Tots of common ownership To some extent, the substandard lot situation can be addressed on case by case basis (variance) and possibly considered with Infill Development Guidelines Recommendation Indefinite continuance PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/05-43 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 223 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Robin Partch Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description Special Use Permit for live entertainment at Northern Vineyard Winery Background This case was continued from the August 8th meeting so that the applicant could be present at the meeting Discussion The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to use the winery premises, including the exterior deck for commercial recreational entertainment, primarily for music The events would be held on Sunday nights from 7 — 9 pm during the months May - September The applicant was not aware that a Special Use Permit was needed to conduct these events and has had them on a regular basis from May thru September since July 2003 They have also hosted several productions by Theater Associates in the last two years The deck occupancy is 49 Indoor events can accommodate 60 — 70 people The style of music they've been booking on Sunday nights is mostly singer/songwriter/guitar or keyboard, with an occasional jazz and small group vocals There will often be amplification, but the applicant states that because of the small space, the music is kept fairly low Wine by the glass, soda and bottled water are sold during the performances They encourage patrons to bring Tight snacks from home or from the River Market next door There will not be outside signage for these events Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved Special Use Permit shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 The Special Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission upon complaint 3 All required Building Codes shall be met 4 No exterior signage Findings Special Use Permit The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant PLANNING ADMINISTRt !ON APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No _ P 4a5' Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED f 7 2O3 Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and eng►neermg fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material subm►ttec in connection with any application All supporting matenal e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required /fapplication is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits Address of Project 02- /o r lA PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Vila if; Zoning District CBI) Description of Project /►✓e er,r fa fr1 l71e i 1 w►tier7 De-€w<<ses r i 5tc ak-nA 14-tea{-er- "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property OwnerIVW Vi)ineyrow4r5 CDPeravc Mailing Address 223 /V /%%arn S7- City - State - Zip -S/1Lf/�GUAI-e/i mt/ S. Z'� Telephone No _ (0s1-Y30 -/032 Signature (Signature is required) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Representative Mailing Address Assessor's Parcel No ¥O0(p1 f (GEO Coye�) do Pt ern ✓e ey aid S fob,, 5arfck 2 2- / / )%a i, 5 I - Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory City - State - Zip 1, //cAJ .- /VA/ 552g1— Telephone No (0S/ -- 4'3 0-/032 a �p Signature Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM April 20, 2005 July 22, 2005 Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Sirs Minnesota Winegrowers Cooperative dba Northern Vineyards Winery requests a Special Use Permit for their property at 223 North Main Street in the CBD allowing for the use of the winery premises including the exterior deck for commercial recreational entertainment We have had live music on Sunday evenings from 7-9 PM during the months May -September since July 2003, and we have hosted several productions by Theater Associates in the last two years Our deck occupancy is 49, for indoor events we can accommodate 60-70 patrons The style of music we book for Sunday evenings is mostly singer/songwnter/guitar or keyboard with occasional jazz and small group vocals There often is amphficatton but because of the small space is kept fairly low We sell wine by the glass, soda and bottled water, we encourage patrons to bring hght snacks from home or from the River Market next door Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, ,c;. ‘ C2-1)(-c RobinPartch, General Manager Northern Vineyards Winery al , PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/05-49 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 1119 N 3`d St Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name David and Jamie Rorabeck Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 15 feet requested for the construction of a 6 ft x 12 ft foyer Discussion The applicants are requesting a variance to the front yard setback to construct a 6 ft by 12 ft entry foyer to their split entry house The home currently has an entry depth of 41" with a 36" door The design of the house has cause the applicants to consider a new foyer would be safer than the step up, step down in order to open or close the front door The neighbors split entry house directly south of the applicant has a foyer that is closer to the street than the applicant's house would be after the addition Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a vanance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same distnct and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the pubhc interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings • Check list for Planning Applications Incomplete or unclear applications/plans will be returned to the applicant and may result in delay of application processing Check and attach to application Q The application form completed and signed by the property owner or owners authorized representative 2 Building plans clearly dimensioned and scaled (16 copies) VThe site plan showing exterior property lines, easements, lot width and depth and lot area building(s) location (See attached site plan example, a parcel boundary survey may be required) V'AII adjacent streets or right of ways labeled Ea/Location, elevation, size, height of building or addition, dimensions, materials and proposed use of all buildings and structures (including walls, fences, signs, lighting and hooding devices) existing and proposed for the site (if the site is in a Historic District, additional design detail maybe required) 4/ istances between all structures and between all property lines or easements and structures [V' Show Adjacent buildings to this application site and dimension from property line ri All major existing trees on the site (4 inch caliber or greater), giving type, location, size and other site coverage conditions Q Show existing significant natural features such as rock outcroppings or water courses (existing and proposed marked accordingly) GI Locate all off-street parking spaces, driveways, loading docks and maneuvering areas with dimensions for driveway widths and parking space sizes C3. Pedestrian, vehicular and service points of ingress and egress distances between driveways and street corners © Landscape plan showing number of plants, location, varieties and container sizes (landscape plan) NJ Existing and proposed grading plan showing direction and grade of drainage through and off the site indicate any proposed drainage channels or containment facilities N Required and existing street dedications and improvements such as sidewalks, curbing and pavement /(may not be required) GJ� Letter to the Planning Commission describing the proposed use in detail and indicating how this use will effect and compatibility with adjacent uses or areas 4 Applications for new structures on slopes of 12 percent or greater must include an accurate topographic map The map must contain contours of two -foot intervals for slopes of 12 percent or greater Slopes over 24 percent shall be clearly marked L Other such data as may be required to permit the planning commission to make the required findings for approval/af�he specific type of application AppliLant/owner signature I1—o� Date PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit )( Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The appl►cant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any apphcat►on All supporting material (0 e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with apphcation becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the appl►cat►on process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION j4 _0 0 _43 �( Address of Project 1 1 1 ik) 314 S` Assessors Parcel No ?l - Ci30 ;z)-4 --OOO8 jgE) OCe►Zoning District �� Description of Project �0tev" (id( f% .y X�wick_ ae District, -m -00)4+ QA-1 "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence suhln►tted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and bel,ef, to be true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner No d + j a; foe RorakCCk Representative SQ vwe Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signatur l t' g n l 2 v J3f ((00-2 SWB �sI -351=- '/ s re Lot Size (dimensions) eta x Land Area Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature / (Signs SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Height of Buildings Stpries Principal 16- Accessory Feet i` re la - Total Building floor area ). Id% square feet Existing /) 7 0 square feet Proposed ID. 431 square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM April 20 2005 August 16, 2005 Stillwater Planning Commission We are requesting a 5-foot variance to add a 6' by 12' foyer to our split entry home Our home currently has an entry depth of 41" with a 36" door We feel this is a safety issue as we have to either step up or step down in order to open or close our front door We feel this 6' by 12' foyer would enhance our home's appearance and be a good improvement for our neighborhood There is only one other split entry home in our immediate area That home (next door at 1111 N 3rd Street) already has a foyer addition, which is approximately 22' from the street Our addition would be 30' from the street Our garage is 27' from the street Although a variance is required, precedents have been set We love our neighborhood and look forward to making improvements in our own little area of it Thank you for this consideration David Rorab k Ja f'#ie Rorabeck I support David and Jaime Rorabeck's foyer addition as proposed at i119 N 3rd Street I do not feel a variance would adversely affect this neighborhood or my own property Name S gnature Address Phone 20 12 0 20 SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING TOP OF FLOOR 15 5 1/2 12 0 17 6 1/2 45 0 Cr M CI FRONT ELEVATION Scale 1/4 = 1 0 h cr VI n L EXISTING FRONT ELEVATI Scale 1/8 = 1 0 ASPHALT SHINGLES ROOF VENTS AS REQUIRED SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING TOP OF PLATE 00 a TOP OF FLOOR 60 3 0 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION Jcaie 1/4" = 1' U" TOP OF PLATE SIDING TO MA EXISTING TOP OF FLOG] 15 5 1/2 RZT A TTIIAT TOP OF PLATE SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING TOP OF FLOOR I JI f It ASPHALT SHINGLES ROOF VENTS AS REQUIRED 3 0 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION Scale 1/4 = 1 0 EXTRA RISER AND TREAD TO BE ADDED TO STAIRS NEW HEADER BEAM (SUPPLIER TO VERIFY SIZE AND MATERIAL) WALL TO BE RAISED AND LENGTHENED TO ACCOMODATE NEW FLOOR HEIGHT AND NEW TREAD RISER AND TREAD TO BE REMOVED FROM STAIRS 0 C; 1- M I k1 a I —I I I I 'S b ��► -- I farce + 2 j I i 1 I I I I -Ta-✓'CQ' - I —I i I I --� F-- I I iS 1b� I I I —, • 1 1 I 'I JJ p.vposl C� iT I I I 1 ' - � i I 9- 2 I { I I I I 1 I -g,jat-- I f` � ►ITS-67kift , , , i , 1 ( i ( , , , I I 1 ti t 9 r ,I_' 3r icti „S I I„ I ! „ I i 1 I 1 I 1 I I I ,I { I f 1421 ( )Jf`/I a 1 yi J � �1' �ti a V 1 �� �� -I `<� i�l� JII� ��L_!'-1 r� 1 RI W 10 I ) _0 — 1 vai® '-- = [ J T3ON 1 ) W) r 1 16 1.. II 4 ( � <`0 f:l. TN INE Rxxw R_1w R7N FLOW I Q cg r , .' _I 122 2 I = ; 1322 r �[ ] C f �� —� 1 203 1 2 y J � ), `.—� 22�-�12-1� . � . a� O " � C_� nL-112-15- rYn t15 j A Vicinity Map --- ,r2 , 1, 1 4 4 0 0 D . (( )1 1 - - 198 (--, 12Q2 -20/4 e i* TJ W —5� lo -d T ET—ST11 I°WATEE AR TI L—— zC_FE1 t= Lif 1 11 1 o �—I—[ =2121 149 11' 4 11 �,� L- ;•(1)rt ' 1— 0 174 ) O t ' 0 " Scale in Feet ), 0 �) )) 11 z. 11 ;120 4..4- '3e1 L� iii WEST WILKINS STREET H EAST 10 102� r 1022/ 1 G ?09/e 140 L p 1019 11 a w fY 1016 1022 -- 1005\`--- 11 po4 1007 `� 41001 1008 1003 0 VEST ASPEN S 1 REE 1 EAST'4SPEN STRE andw� � Location Map , W .--" I z I d `. ban _ _c i N q ( - I 1 / z ( LL \ ' R_IW R2OW R19W ���- / /Q / `� \ ` T32N IMPn2N ( / I / Ir 1 DU NI" J 200 76 2 26I TON111 729N T3UN i W. n� ` TON 1 721IN P AN" 727N ;� R_W R_IW R11W 1 �( — 715 6 ( 150 ) Vicinity Map -4.1 ( i I ti x ii �� ii3�/ ) I OO8) —4 1 15 � ) /i ( ,— 1 76 !, .. (( 0 0 46 I ( ) ( — 1 Scale in Feet o L Q -2-)X 2 � y ... �: 73 7 �, ,-) O Q, 1/ r (01 b w_ .m Im I 6_ mww NON)12 uMy 1.1 Location Map i J / / 1 ? Some Would..flurrome• Moo )"°°�� hromM. 17 • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/05-51 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 720 South Second Street Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name John and Aileen Krozos Type of Application Special Use Permit for a Home Occupation — Type 3 Project Descnption A Home Occupation special use permit for a home photography business Discussion The applicant is requesting a special use permit for a home photography business She is a wedding and portrait photographer Most of the applicants work is 'on location' at wedding venues, churches, public parks, and clients homes The home would be used as a base to operate the business Operating the business would include bookkeeping, taking calls from clients and prospective clients, storage of camera equipment and at times meeting with clients Hours of operation are Tuesday thru Sunday, loam to 8 pm The permitted sign will be six square feet and will not be lit Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 No outside storage or display of products, equipment or merchandise is permitted, 2 Any retail sales must be accessory or incidental to the primary residential use, 3 Infrequent hobby, craft or art sales are permitted twice a year for not more than six (6) days per calendar year, 4 Any sign must be unlighted and smaller than two (2) square feet, 5 Customers are permitted by appointment only, 6 Not more than twenty percent (20%) of the total gross floor area of the dwelling unit may be used for the Home Occupation or four hundred square feet, whichever is less, 7 No activity or equipment may be used that creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odor, or electnc or television interference is permitted if it is detectable by adjacent neighbors, 8 Business hours are limited from 7 00 a m to 8 00 p m , 9 Off street parking must be provided for customers, 10 No more traffic which is allowed other than in a normal residential area, 11 No more than one (1) nonresident employee is allowed, 12 Type III Home Occupations are subject to review upon complaints from the neighborhood If in the opinion of the Zoning Administrator the complaints are J substantial, a public heanng must be held, at which time additional conditions may be added to this Special Use Permit or in the alternative, the Type III Home Occupation Permit may be revoked Findings Special Use Permit The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise detnmental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter from the Applicant/Neighborhood Petition PLANNING ADMINISTRk 4ON APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and eng►neenng fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits 'A, PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project T� 7 5 �1� SV ' 5 W Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District gY7 Description of Projec v OkAA "I hereby state tforegoing statements and all data, 1nformaf'on and ev►:fence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " U�v` Property Owner • . -WA AZ-05 Representative Mailing Address Z S 2A. Mailing Address City - Stat . zIp%Akv.kit RA S SOBL City - State - Zip Telephone 1 o (05 J- S 1 1 Telephone No Signature,g� 1111/1■l Signature .L c+r. / ,s, EOC.de) 6 ig s r wired) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\she!la\PLANAPP FRM April 20 2005 S 30 9 2sn 2 p w c fI as 26 4 an _- 27 at as 26 is 5 2 dot s NN 9 Is 2�n 1.9. IA s 21 .et 135 11 9 r 19 dm 1 1 13 is i 16 ss � a,°"t ®1 S 9 ' as 16 1 15 f!} - Location Map 3y°o>,i t C $ 29 las 3 � 28 J R i 27 ias '([ 4 4 hoar ` $ 9 26 a10. 35 as Vfj. 5 9 155 g s 35 9 L 24 as u as 723 8 p. 9 $ ss ss 22 ss 2o>ar 5 ss 9 9 cpal t 9 20 ss iJ f]�5° 16 4i: CHURC STREET ILIW FLOW R19W 11_2W R_1W R31W Vicinity Map 0 172 Scale in Feet Sow. Washing mwyarrryoM1 Ills Mao1 0467 Leigh Cavalier Photography 720 S 2nd st Stillwater, Mn 55082 651 439-1599 My name is Aileen Leigh Cavalier Krzos I have lived at the above address with my husband John sons Stefan and Jackson and daughter Jaime since 1991 I have been a Wedding and Portrait Photographer working out of our home for the last 4 years I am an "on location' photographer I mainly go to where my clients are Wedding venues churches public parks and clients homes use our home as a base to run my business which includes Managing my business, book keeping taking calls from clients and prospective clients storage of my camera equipment and at times I will meet with clients at my home I more often than not go to where my clients live My hours are Tuesday thru Sunday 10am to 8pm I must qualify this The majonty of contact with my clients is on the phone or on the Internet I shoot on location the only time clients actually come to my home is to pick up proof prints wedding or family albums, sign contracts or for a consultation More times than not I meet with my clients at they re home or place of business The reasons for showing my hours of business as being so long are that I make myself available to my clients on my cell phone dunng that time and clients need time after the normal working day to be able to see me I do not have a steady stream of people coming to my door In fact if you asked any neighbor they would be surpnsed to know that I've been running my business out of my home for the last 4 years I Photographers are in a constant need to sell themselves If I want my business to grow and suceed I must continue to take every opportunity available to me Thank you for your consideration Sincerely Aileen Krzos Leigh Cavalier Photography Petition to Display Business Sign We the undersigned understand that our neighbor Arleen Krzos is seeking to ask permission to attach a regulation sized business sign to the front of her family home at 720 S 2nd st , announcing her occupation as a photographer By signing this petition we are in fact stating that we have no problem with this request T rr; -YSmt��l��i nson 0&4/60 __4004ass 7 5 7z3 S 2d 717 41 d- 5+ S. 7ncj2 S sr s Petition to Display Business Sign We the undersigned understand that our neighbor Aileen Krzos is seeking to ask permission to attach a regulation sized business sign to the front of her family home at 720 S 2nd st , announcing her occupation as a photographer By signing this petition we are in fact stating that we have no problem with this request er/f- e2-,/ (77 Ps A 2 ny ST S 5 er $Db 5 Se olik et 5f- SFt( 4er-, M Ye 7 te/S7 5.614(kitef' //)9 goy a ^) 54 5 7i5- s 3)42 tea- PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/05-52 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 915 6th Avenue South Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name Marek and Amy Mino Type of Application Variance Project Descnption A vanance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 4 feet requested) for the replacement of an existing porch Discussion The applicants are requesting a vanance to the side yard setback, 5 feet required, 4 feet requested for the replacement of an existing second story deck with as addition of a new wrap -around porch, and the addition of a first floor porch directly beneath the second floor porch with a wrap- around porch The existing porch the applicants would like to replace is a 1980's style The proposed porches would match the original style of the house built in 1878 Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a vanance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not matenally impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings City - State - Zip , PLANNING ADMINISTRt ION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material subm►ttec in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with applicator becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If apphcatior is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with apphcat►ons Any incomplete appl►cation or supporting material will delay the application process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended the app!icanf w►ll receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 'Mr 6- , S 0 (41-1, Zoning District RE Description of Project gctCR Assessor's Parcel No '3`/ ° 3 O02 °922 Oo 02 7 Wr? _ iu o hik_C, (GEO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " ni n Property Owner / ►I fW-I f �S111 i ,4% / N o Representative E L F Mailing Address �l S 47-4 go IAA, Mailing Address J kJ /4,js4-042z Telephone No 64-1 y 30 — 7 0 Signature e is City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature equired) (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) 52 x 132- Land Area de / Height of Buildings . Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area - 6 square feet Existing t.p/occe X)o quare feet Proposed / square feet Paved Impervious Area 800 square feet b'' i cf'` / No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM April 20, 2005 1. 370 \ w H LL 0 f 703 1709 17i1 1 717 1861 704i •1 Z12 71� • r 1 80 1'7 • 304 81211 O M# 3171 19.15 9101 17 916/ 9 C9?3 9241 1007 1009 1013 11010 11017 1016 8 l op 1,03 11.02 1107 11'06 1109 • Location Map 11 1112 „6- 3( \XI6 � 408 Cfl F- 0 w v/o X F- 0 709 500 717 725 805 809 • • • 1dSON ST f 901 .907 906 911 910 9.19 / 918 923 927 924 931 935 93.6 EAST 1003/ / 1004 100/ 1008 1015 • 1101J 101� 1101 1024 / 1105 1032 1'113 1036 • 1- 0 w z LL .- 50 510 1 911 / . . 919 ) 920 92� 926 932 9.5 518 DUBUQUE 1005 1002 1°1°9 /1006 1015 /1014 11019 / �1022 1023�• 1030 506 5q$ RIW ROW RI9W R22W R2IW R2OW Vicinity Map 0 176 Scale in Feet *a�� cornpletton elon a�0.1 offices 0�wroAW.... b na. Waaripion Cm. & Or.. ?t (I5)43048 nW onh9W0 Home. nre Moo H.E 0 wn 00 203 woo A00 August 24, 2005 Planning Commission Members I am applying for a one -foot variance to the required five-foot side yard setback to replace the existing porch My intentions are to remove the 1980's style deck and to rebuild the new porch to match ongmal construction of my 1878 home PLY/ /1 A, `i p do/. YA— tc s /13774 iron set indicates iron found as noted aring system is an assumed datum • Indicates Measured value '4R • Indicates Recorded value -- 0U- Indicates overhead utility lines Underground or overhead public or private ut or adjacent the parcel were not located in with this survey unless shown otherwise he CERTIFLATE OF SURVEY SURVEY MADE FXCLUSIVEI Y FOR! NOTES Offsets shown to existing structures are measured to the outside building wall line unless shown or noted otherwise hereon Any projections from said wall lines such as eaves sills steps etc will Impact these offsets accordingly Note encroachments as shown Parcel description furnished by client contained no utility or driveway easements thereon (Doc No 3061672) Marek L and Amy L Mino 915 Sixth Avenue South Stillwater MN 55082 BARRETT M STACK STILLWATER MINN 35082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LANDSURVEVOR Td No 439 5630 ilities on conjunction reon DFSCKIPTION. As Supplied By Client (Copy of Doc No 3061672) Lot 15 Block 16 Hersey Staples and Co s Addition to Stillwater Hersey Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater is recorded as Doc No 416049 County Recorder of Washington County Minnesota 10INT MINO/ROSE DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS (Added July 31 2003) An easement for driveway and utility purposes with no p8rking permitted across the following described parcels of land The South 1 00 foot of the West 75 38 feet of Lot 15 Block Addition to Stillwater Washington County Minnesota Note PROPOSED (Mino Portion) (Rose Portion) Orr s v Z \1 0..(rig 'IO 19 Washington County Minnesota in the Office of the over under and 16 Hersey Staples and Co s and The North 9 00 feet of the West 75 38 feet 14 Block 16 Hersey Staples and Co s Addition to Stillwater Washington County`lMinnesota (add covenants and maintenance agreements as needed) I�� L rev! f4•- N�A4 i "r a/ I tr _v a Jje- rb I/1 /A , /V OF/ -if r / 0 1 •r Gr (wrt ince r r si wwss) e r, ill Bear 17.0 Orr_vic "QV w.k Z..1 Ow) \c��CNT Hi N1 9/S \\\\\\\ LOT /G ,Jr — - - N69"XL 2/ E M /lI <9 - - - Wm, Fr Gil 4 / r A 01 exW4D r.aur 2 Sreer Fe4 ,2- . rr»r 2Vm& -K /ri/NQ Lor /S 49 1.fy Frt "Y.... w.. FMr R� t: r S /rl! 71 wovate ../rr `� ` .•`-"G /N /12 �9- - doe V `v./ 0 \i Ae.Po.5 .D SieVwr $d!'1�6 2/ (s' Lie vew.or Eioiser/yENr 1 e /..z a /rr EAt4,4 9 v1/7-. tww O !or/1 az /6 1 hereby certify that this survey plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a m/Bose of duly Registered eglMinnau land Surveyor under the laws ofedeciattig Date July 7,. ZQQ3 Reg No 1.3774 v J 08/15/05 c0) o C- CL co o CT cn E c c co 2 N v Ctl coo enE o O C � CD co c NOTE New porch columns to be selected from available manufacturer's stock, match drawing in general dimensions and proportions, select column to match front porch columns as closely as possible per owner Column to be structurally rated softwood Guard rails and spindles also to be stock items chosen by owners 3'-0" guard rail height 1 PORCH COLUMN PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OWNERS Marek and Amy Mind PROJECT ADDRESS 915 Sixth Ave S Stillwater MN SITE TELEPHONE (651) 430-2701 PROJECT ARCHITECT Paul Ormseth Architect 403 Landmark Center 75 W 5th St St Paul MN 55102 (651) 298-6789 L() EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE #915 SITE PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replace pre-existing second story wood deck with addition of a new wrap -around porch (added to existing wood -frame single family residence ) New EPDM roofing membrane at porch roof with wood decking installed over roofing membrane 132' proposed open-air wraparound porch wl upper level deck 6'-0" existing 2-car garage NORTH PROJECT INFORMATION Z 0 0 0 Z Q =W UQ 0 a J_ QC OC W Q Z N w�CL O CZ scale 1" = 1'-0" scale 1/16" =11-0" 1 08/15/05 111 — -' deck beam below joists joists cantilever to house (do not attach to ledger) SOUTH ELEVATION 8" dia footings L - wood lattice (not shown for clarity) 12" dia footings w/ 18" belled base L - _ J space guard-rail stanchions for (5) equal guardrail sections i I wood stoop with ti 1 1 cased stringers i t 1lilin111 I III I ;hill l l l l 1 U1IIIIIIIII 111 i (bear on shallow concrete pad) r-1 EAST ELEVATION new 12" dia conc post footings w/ 18" belled base scale 1/4" = 1'-0" ` / scale 1/4" = 1'-0" ELEVATION Z 0 0 0 U 0 ce Z W 0 w 0 Z_5 4 0_ N NVld 13n31 aNf1O2ID d0 L = .311. oleos NV1d 13n31 ZI3dd fl N 0 0) CD o. rn 0 co c m w c' o 5 8 m 3N (D0 v� o 0 ta O. CD 1-0" (to footing) 1'-0" (to footing) BEAM \ BEAM (see 2/5) (see 2/5) 9.5 o v, n a 0 align N 3. 0. 0 3 equal bays of • 13 N 0 5 2. c0 3cra a oCD 3 m 0 N 0. E co cln 1 new Marvin 2-8 6-8 french door (reframe opening with new header venfy 80" high door will fit here) new window per owners (new opening with header) i 8o o. CD CD 13 co CD CD O E• . • C O a ET 6"4- o � N c o moo 0 3 CT fa, O 3 3 CD -1E4 O IV MINO RESIDENCE REAR PORCH ADDITION 915 SIXTH AVE S STILLWATER, MN FLOOR PLANS PAUL ORMSETH ARCHITECT 75 W 5TH ST SUITE #403 ST PAUL MN 55102 (651) 298-6789 0 CO 0 u1 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/05-54 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 1913 North Fifth Street Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Scott Junker Type of Application Subdivision and Variance Project Description Request to subdivide a 22,500 square foot lot (gross land area) into two lots of 10,000 square feet and 3,700 square feet of developable land Discussion This request is to subdivide a 22,500 square foot lot into two Tots The 22,500 square foot lot currently has an existing residence located on it The portion of the lot that is being proposed to be subdivided is steeply sloped and does not have access to an improved public road The gross area of the proposed "new" Lot "B" is 12,500 square feet, of that area it is estimated from the submitted plan that 9,000 square feet or 75% of the land area is in slopes greater than 24% leaving 3,000 square feet of developable land Developable land area of 10,000 square feet is required to have sufficient land area to meet the 10,00 square foot requirement of the RA, Single Family Residential Zoning District The new lot would not have access to an improved public right of way The North Fourth Street right o f way is not improved because of steep slopes To get access to the new lot, a driveway easement is proposed along the north side of the Lot "A" the lot with the existing house In conclusion, the proposal does not meet the developable lot size requirement (10,000 square feet) of the RA District and access from a frontage on an unimproved public road is not available or provided Recommendation Denial Finding The proposal is not consistent with lot size requirements of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTRJ JON APPLICATION FORM Case No 5015/11/66-- Date Filed Fee Paid 'aen Receipt No COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit /Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineenng fees The fees for requested action are attached to this application The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal subm►tteo in connection with any application All supporting material (► e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan showing drainage and setbacks is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the appl,cat►on process After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project \I 13l SA') a/�30a�?4�0®/ Assessor's Parcel No 3 Zoning District Description of Project (G O Code) %Nc X-2200 ))— to 1 - b "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted a d used " Property Owner �V Representative Mailing Address P U & Mailing Address City - State - Zip k,J ,�( City - State - Zip Telephone No ' , 3 -7901. $ Telephone No Signature Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area c2a� (Signat Lot Size (dimensions) 'x Land Area ired) Height of Buildings Stories Principal 02 Accessory Feet aulA square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM April 20, 2005 UT 1Y 5 6 1 S CREEK 1 4 .00 PT OF TH NE OF TIE Nw J_ F— co STILLWATER TOWNSHIP CITY OF STILLWATER EASEMENT 2 a 8 8 8 O~P Nap D�� 6 G 35 M .0 6.8 6 ORA NAGE U 6 TY AND OADWAY ESM PER DOC318 2 D UFFEN 1 3 oo oa H ADDI 00 46 51 300 65506164 8 Il O U SLUE TTOS TEO MN RSHNAB DEVE PMEN EASEMEN PER DOC NO684273 433 PT EACH S DE OFDL6 OWN CREEK) 01,_L_hrt 6RPANE, Gip k\\N 300 8 Jm • 8 y��(JyI�V� '1y7,�S g 05 00 48476R 00 60 TH ST PER PLAT DEDICATED N F W re ce Q' 0 LL 2 I- �° R o Z R MENT 20 W DE 5 REET 6 5 ORM WATER EASEMENT PER DOC 34 467 PER DOD NO 313 30 Location Map 60 r0 DEDICATED W ALDER ST 8 8 8 so gam so 5 7 2 3 so 50 A 8 3 a re a. w 8 � a O c 3 ceW z 8 N SO 5 4 0* 3 a 8 4 8 3� MI so vArATFn DOC T25774 w N THIRD ST 4J 2 0 00 so So 6 8 0 0 8 2 8 4 3 so 8 WEST POPLAR STREET 222 OF DEEDS PAGE 293 VACATED BALSAM STREET R_2W R21w R2OW Vicinity Map 192 Scale in Feet .mnO,S*4 %wI..2 *5t p-M e s, vCowry ofb. ti mwro mJ , ro vu.Nax only w5Nrpm.pny b 0- Pn�.i0l c.p. 85.wy rr. Pan. Oa.. m O.S003 W m.. aru.J ...30 Jun.30. 303S ao PmIsd AWu 20 203 Cr ,7�a� 651 PO Box 727 Stillwater MN 55082 G)VOZA 61Li CIAO VAI1-\ Pnv_ k0 `J rJQ,VSI X-3O0 1 V-3\-- ° 0°0 (-\\ 1-0\- r2)) VCA-->(AA C"\‘ \CA \ ‘(411Th 4-1P1 44°‘ Slog -r � S w� Q�, \_„0\k/Lei_ R_IW fL IW RI9W R2_W R_IN R2OW Vicinity Map Scale in Feet ,li, ,._c ha mu of WWII - a noul wpm vium Wes Gourd ae. T. rani.w beuud>rmisname .Mw.ap an w.eqo. Co. nal awww Inn* Sawa w..royu. Cowl e•...ses, oiro Non RS 1430.E 1 r.RN ar. ewee �t w weerm ea,.. Wears kiln X09 Map nrea July MOS e8o d9 0 J i i i 8179 i i i wvai•,.••• \• ••N \ iNH11NNiiYHiiNMiNrOii�NiCNHiiHYii••H••iN•iHN•NN•ilLM•IRMi1�4•i•i• i•NINi�MM•NMi1�1•7i Hi•i•�M•i•INi1NNiNHi 1 \ \ \ 7J 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/05-55 Planning Commission Date September 12, 2005 Project Location 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue Comprehensive Plan District Lakeshore Residential Zoning District LR Applicants Name Richard and Leah Peterson Type of Application Subdivision Project Description Request to subdivide a 67,830 square foot (Net) Lot 2, Blk 1 Cochrane's Long Lake Addition, 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue into two lots of 46,972 and 20,858 square feet each Discussion This site was zoned Lakeshore Residential last year The zoning requires 20,000 square feet per Tots The proposal meets the lot size requirements A wetland (1,547 square feet) has been delineated on Parcel "A" Required setbacks for Parcel "A" are 85 feet from Long Lake ordinary high watermark (891 4') and 50 feet from wetland The building location will have to be moved to meet the required setbacks The site plan shows a shared driveway for both lots off of Mid Oaks to reduce the impact on the woodland and to Mid Oaks driveways Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 A grading, drainage erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and erosion control measures installed before site grading 2 Trees in proximity to grading areas shall be protected as required by City Forester 3 An easement shall be prepared and recorded with subdivision recording providing for a shared driveway access to Lots A and B with shared maintenance (this easement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney) 4 The new residence shall connect to city sanitary sewer and water services in Mid Oaks 5 Required development impact and park dedication fees shall be paid before plat recording Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No U DSO Date Fded 06— Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED x Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development* Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material sub:rnfted In connection with any application All supporting material (I e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material Is required If application is submitted to the City Counc►/, twelve (12) copes of supporting material ►s required A site plan is required with alppl►catlons Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 7/ 6 n V D OAth S A- V E Assessors Parcel No 3 O 030 2..0 q3 0003 (GEO Code) Zoning District L_ R Description of Project S r ' i P c. C= LOT s UM I V lS ho "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. 1 further certify I will comply with the permit !fit is granted and used " 12 i c c-FA2p 11- Pcr-E-/ snw Property Owner L c= t /1 5 G° F' r EJZ -1' iv Representative S c_ Mailing Address i/ C 0 ri I t D OA.KS 4 v E Mailing Address 5 A 0-1 City - State - Zip SD r c-L- r-'' A 7 E/Z 14/ N S -y^O 8"2 City - State - Zip Telephone No 6 S'/- 3 s / '° ca. Telephone No Signature R G o Li} 2 - - SITE AND PROJEC Lot/Size (dimensions) Q� x 00 r- ?o o Land Area I / S/ 9 5-7 ,- Q F-r Height of Buildings Stories Feet Pnnapal - LAJI w(d"r 30 Accessory Signature (Signature is required) T DESCRIPTION &-xf f T' Pi Total Building floor area 3. O a square feet Existing 3/ S' d O square feet Proposed ifforprciDsP square feet Paved Impervious Area 3/900 square feet 'i` No of off-street parking spaces 9 1` a r ► s 6 h/U E Richard & Leah Peterson 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue Stillwater MN 55082 August 26, 2005 Planning Commission City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater MN 55082 Re Application for Resubdivision 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue Members of the Planning Commission We are applying for approval of a resubdivision of our residential property to create an additional lot about one-half acre in size for the future construction of a new residence We have not made final decisions for a new residence and are not applying for any approvals for a with respect to a new residence at this time The proposed pad shown on the survey is for general information to show the possible location and size of a new residence We plan to sell the existing residence on the remainder of the property We believe that an additional lot and residence will not adversely impact this large lot neighborhood because of the lot size, distances between the properties, the terrain, and the wooded nature of the lots We plan to retain most of the large trees, and we propose using a shared driveway easement for the new lot in order to preserve the existing large trees shielding the building site from the road Thank you for your consideration Si nrely yours, Richard A Peterso • ILIW R21W RI9W 77J'1 T3 IN III ■I. 772N 77IN STREET �Ew.- ... • THIN VON 1 1D ME 1EAE rig T29N ��L -11 I NOWT 72BN Tars, LONG LAKE T27N R_ W R21 W T27N R2 W mAO rot OW OF TER PR 1ET E W TER ARE •m a, Vlanity Map CO ` V 1\ 4111\ .\\ NNS N` ��, r •" o~ Pogo _ PR rE rE WE LAND- am �,r,' 0 262 •" Scale in Feet 9 • • m a • S q MID r or \ q R --\ 04.. ° fi q O. 44. o wr RR 0.N OR IT OUR a oun a„ n — m \ Or Or I . raw, III. ,II.T II:. own, rancus Wezhinpan Co. el I Ices Purim.. W ae no on Pau no Location Map , ♦ / w..l w' ww� Com Purwr., . ga ^°m \t us_ 4 ! wPw.".e 2 200ws FOUND I/2 \ OPEN RON 40 PIPE ON LOT \ LNE FRO'1 T1k pRNER opSLOT L7 N7 602 40 NORTvoRLY 100E OF LOT 2 PARCEL A ZONED tR Wo mNm$g? � m f 554 13 — S87 08 35 E O 1 WESTERLY CORNER V w e dJ ^gym OF LOT 2 64454 Wy` Se6n1856 W ‘*41 dog O $o v gq2 SYMBOLS CCUHOLE VERT GAS METER - FENCE I— J CONCRETE DENOTES FOUND 1/2 IRON PIPE / / / / / / M CATCH BASIN HYDRANT SIGN WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE GAS VALVE�x OVERHEAD WIRES 1 WELL 0 FOUND 1/2 OPEN RON PPE ON LOT LNE \ ( I- Y SURVEY NOTES ZONED AP OWNER DAVID & HEIDI BURNS 7190 MID OAKS AVE N 0 4) A7 { 1 �1 0 A7.a�0 0—Ftnc7�6P5�°Ea1�2P�' 892 0 p5P 0 r• OPY- 000 J FOUND 1/2 - OPEN RCN PIPE 07 SE LY OF LOT CORNER PARCEL B 290 00 360 00 S86 50 50 E P..-_ ,-._� cR 1¢eee III 0-}r le 7GARAGE O'�,G q,SsyO,, LL:51542 36 52 ELEFLOOR d 225 4 -848 5 ON -b4B 6 � OWNER ZONED AP DONAL & KAY PETERSON 7130 MID OAKS AVE N THE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF CHOCHRANE 5 LONG LAKE FIELDWORK WAS PEFORMED FEB 8 & 9 2005 TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE SHOT TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES DESPITE SNOW AND ICE CONDf1TONS SEWER INVERTS WERE TAKEN AS CLOSE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STRUCTURE AS POSSIBLE THROUGH THE ICE AND SNOW BUILD UP PIPE SIZES WERE TAKEN FROM CITY AS BUILT PLANS WHERE EVER AVAILABLE DUE TO THE DIFFICULTY SEEING THE INVERT SIZES UNDERCROIMe7 - 00117741CATION AN0 SEWER EASEIENT PER DOC NO 37404 Faro FENCE POST / / / / / / / BENCHMARKS ELEVATIONS BASED ON INFORMATION FROM THE CITY OF STILLWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS MINIMUM LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION 89 5 VICINITY MAP nAN SITE 8 CITY OF STILLWATER MINNESOTA LOCATION OF WATER AND SANTAY SERVICE PER CITY CONSTRUCTION DRAWNCS / / / / / / ZONED RA OWNER ROANALD & GAIL KRANZ 7181 MID OAKS AVE N I1 / 30 RCH/� O RCP / / WILLIAM & \\ SUSAN OAKS AVE N DUSTIN \ / ZONED RA A A / / PROPOSED BUILDING PAD AREA SUBJECT TO CHANGE EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot Tw (2) Block 0 e (1) COCHRANE S LONG LAKE ac ord g t the pl t th reof o file nd of ecord the office of the Registrar of Titles In and for Wash ngton County Minnesota PARCEL A PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Lot Two (2) Block One (1) COCHRANE'S LONG LAKE according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Ttles in and for Washington County M nnesota descnbed as follows Beginning at the northeasterly come of sa d Lot 2 thence on an assumed bearing of South 31 degrees 24 minutes 25 seconds East along the easterly I ne of said Lot 2 a d stance of 125 00 feet thence South 73 degrees 27 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 134 44 feet thence South 54 degrees 04 m nutes 35 seconds West a d stance of 139 15 feet thence South 86 deg ees 08 m nutes 56 seconds West a d stance of 644 84 feet to the most westerly corner of said Lot 2 thence North 79 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds East along the northe ly line of said Lot 2 a d stance of 602 40 feet the ce North 54 degrees 04 m nutes 35 seconds East along the orthe ly I e of sa d Lot 2 a d stance of 280 00 fret to the POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL B PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of Lot Two (2) Block One (1) COCHRANE'S LONG LAKE according to the plat thereof on file and of record the off ce of the Reg strar of Ttles n and for Wash gto County M nnesota descnbed as follows COMMENCING at the northeasterly corner of sa d Lot 2 thence on an assumed bearing of South 31 degrees 24 minutes 25 seconds East along the easterly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 125 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING the c S th 73 deg ees 27 m tes 24 a ds W t d stanc of 134 44 feet thence 5o th 54 degrees 04 m notes 35 seconds West a d stance of 139 15 feet thence South 86 degrees 08 m notes 56 seconds West a distance of 644 84 feet to the most westerly comer of said Lot 2 thence South 87 degrees 08 m nutes 33 seconds East along the southerly line of said Lot 2 a d stance of 554 13 feet thence So th 86 degrees 50 m nutes 50 seconds East along the southerly 1 ne of sa d Lot 2 a distance of 360 00 feet, thence North 24 degrees 09 m notes 10 seconds East along the easterly I ne of sa d Lot 2 a d stance of 40 00 feet thence northerly 118 17 feet along the easterly line of said Lot 2 being a tangential curve concave to the west having a adius of 121 86 feet and a central angle of 55 degrees 33 minutes 35 seconds thence North 31 degrees 24 m notes 25 seconds West along the easterly I ne sa d Lot 2 a d stance of 71 23 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING PROPOSED DRIVEWAY EASEMENT Gopher State One CaII TWIN CITY AREA 651 454 0002 TOLL FREE 1 800 252 1166 An easement 30 00 feet n w dth fo ngress egress and driveway p rposes over and accross Lot Two (2) Block 0 e (1) COCHRANES LONG LAKE accord rig to the plat thereof on fle and of record n the office of the Registrar of Ttles n and for Washington County M nnesota the center) ne of said easement is descnbed as follows Beg n rig t the ortheaste ly come of sa d Lot 2 thence o a assumed bean g of South 31 degrees 24 m nutes 25 seconds East along the easterly I ne of said Lot 2 a distance of 134 04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the centerline to be described thence South 42 degrees 20 minutes 26 seconds West a distance of 28 13 feet thence westerly 52 54 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a radius of 36 52 feet a d a central angle of 82 d gr es 25 m n to 47 s conds thence North 55 degrees 13 m n tes 48 seconds West a d stance of 30 00 feet and said line there terminal ng DEVELOPMENT DATA TOTAL AREA LOT 2 =115 957 SQ. FT TOTAL AREA OF PARCEL A = 46 028 SO, FT TOTAL AREA PARCEL A ABOVE LONG LAKE 0 H L = 22 405 SO, FT TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND PARCEL A = 1 547 5Q FT TOTAL AREA OF PARCEL B =69 929 SQ FT TOTAL AREA PARCEL B ABOVE LONG LAKE 0 H L = 46 972 SQ FT NORTH 4C ITY OF ST1 LLWATEI2 OWNERS RICHARD & LEAH PETERSON 7160 MID OAKS AVE N SILLWATER MN 55082 PHONE 651-439 5108 COUNTY WAS1-111%.1GTON COUNTY SEAL THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEAL CERTIFICATION I he eby reify that this plan was p pared by m o nd ,ny dl a supervl I and that I am d ly Lice ed Land Surveyor nd the law of the stet of MINNESOTA D I L Th m R g keno N 25718 D t 2 21 OS REVISIONS DATE REVISION 2 21 05 ORIGINAL SURVEY 8 25-05 REVISED PROJECT LOCATION 7l 60 MICI OAKS AVE N P I D #3003020430003 Suite #8100 200E Chestnut Street Stillwater MN 55082 Phone 651 275 6969 Fax 651275 8976 d8-csN® mcleodilse net CORN ERSTON E LAND SURVEYING INC FILE NAME PROJECT NO SURVZZ82 ZZ05082 MINOR LOT SUBDIVISION WETLAND DELINEATION PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. Graham Environmental Services, Inc. Wetland Delineation Report Stillwater Delineation Prepared for: Dick Peterson Stillwater, Minnesota Wetland A Looking East March 31, 2005 GES Project No. 2004.028 1 ( Vr www.grahamenvironmental.com Graham Environmental Services, Inc PO Box 189 Ellsworth Wisconsin 54011 Wetland Delineation Report Stillwater Delineation Prepared for Dick Peterson Stillwater, Minnesota March 31, 2004 Background Graham Environmental Services, Inc (GES) has completed the wetland delineation of a site located in part of the S %2 SE'/ Section 30, T3ON, R2OW, in Washington County, Minnesota Mid Oaks Avenue North borders the property on the east Long Lake borders the property on the west Private and residential property is located on the south and north (Figure 1) The topography is relatively flat according to the U S G S Stillwater Quadrangle (Figure 2) On May 18, 2004, GES conducted the delineation of one wetland on the property The approximate site and wetland boundaries are shown on a 2000 aerial photo in Figure 3 Methodologies The wetland was delineated using the methods contained in the "Routine Determinations" section of the U S Army Corps of Engineers "Wetlands Delineation Manual' (Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987) This is the methodology currently used by both the U S Army Corps of Engineers for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and by local government units administering the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act GES classified the wetland under the U S Fish and Wildlife Service's (FWS) Cowardin system and Circular 39 methodologies Subsequent to wetland delineation field work, the flagged boundaries were located by the project surveyor Soil colors described herein follow 'Munsell Soil Color Charts" Phone 715 647 5110 / 888 279 2070 Fax 715 647 5209 / 888 279 2069 Stillwater Delineation Wetland Delineation Report GES Project No 2004 028 March 31 2005 Page 2 Results Wetland A Wetland A is a small isolated basin located in the northeastern portion of the property Dominant wetland vegetation consists of reed canary grass (Phalans arundinacea), smartweed (Polygonum spp ), Iris (Iris spp ), sedge (Carex spp ) and red osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera) (planted) Upland vegetation consists of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), box elder (Acer negundo), reed canary grass, white oak (Quercus alba), quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), stinging nettle (Urtica dio,ca), currant (Ribes spp ), American elm (Ulmus amencana) and paper birch (Betula papynfera) The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Figure 4) does not map the wetland GES would classify the wetland as temporarily flooded, palustnne, emergent (PEMA), which equates to Type 1 seasonally flooded basin under the Circular 39 system Soils in the wetland were examined approximately six feet from flag A-1 and were found to contain black fine sandy loam over grayish brown fine sandy loam with few dark yellowish brown mottles over gray fine sandy loam No surface water was observed in the lowest portion of the wetland and no free water was observed in the wetland soil pit Upland soils were examined approximately eight feet from flag A-1 and were found to contain very dark grayish brown fine sandy loam over brown fine sandy loam No free water was observed in the upland soil pit The Washington County soil survey (Figure 5) shows the soils in the vicinity of the wetland to be Mahtomedi loamy sand The Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Inventory (Figure 6) does not map the wetland but does map Long Lake as Protected Water #21 P Jurisdiction The enclosed wetland delineation data forms indicate whether wetlands are isolated or not for purposes of U S Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act This determination is made by GES in the field at the time of the delineation and is essentially our assessment based on the portion of the particular wetland we observe In some cases, only a small portion of the wetland edge is evaluated If no inlets or outlets are observed in the evaluated area, and none are apparent on available aerial photos or the USG S topographic map, we are inclined to determine the wetland is isolated However, since the entire wetland is sometimes not assessed, it is possible that inlets and/or outlets do exist and that the wetland has a surface connection to a federal Stillwater Delineation Wetland Delineation Report GES Project No 2004 028 March 31 2005 Page 3 navigable" water and, thus, falls within the jurisdiction of Section 404 Therefore, a determination by GES of whether a particular wetland is isolated or not should not be considered a final determination with regard to Corps jurisdiction A copy of this report should be submitted to the Corps of Engineers the Local Government Unit administering the Wetland Conservation Act and, if DNR- protected waters are present on the site, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources It is also possible that the city or watershed district has wetland ordinances which must be complied with Supplying these reports will serve the dual purpose of determining which agencies have jurisdiction and beginning the process of obtaining concurrence with the delineated wetland boundaries Prior to construction that could affect any of the on -site wetlands, any necessary permits should first be obtained Additional information regarding each wetland s vegetation, soils and hydrology is included in Appendix A A ground photo of Wetland A is included in Figure 7 The information contained herein represents the findings of GES during wetland delineation activities conducted on May 18 2004, at the referenced site Graham Environmental Services, Inc dr Georg Callow Date Wetland Scientist Enclosures 79 Sawmill Golf Club Approximate Project Location ti 17 66th-St7u a 0 z — 80th-S outwell metery 75th St14- 1341 m Oak Glen Golf Course l m �9te '9044e/I 1 --I1? did N ' 1 _ I UV Myrtle St - 72nd z _ interiachen Dr _ - w , I1 SUlivrater L— I - L l' -1-571 = � �� , " l __:_-_=VV-PIne�Str -,--- D ,.-a _i ,▪ i �+IU "e°0pa I, 1 ,P ., +i Cn I r s + t I-- I u4 I I eJ �5 z t ,� -6 • 7 a 1 'r / Lily Lake_ St Crow I 1 1 - itecreabnn 'UI _ Vineyards i a I w fl , Ares i sf + 4 moans St i r+' r ii �f 11 - - , al i 1 r`- — �' - 2nd -St N Curve Crest_Blvd W -611 Applewood Hills u�l n Tower Dr W + Golf Club 1 , A,`- - St-N Oa-arkffeights 1 60th St N } �s Stillwater Country Club W Linden St wz Ot S N I--CapeJYlEngMo— sies - .� A N Not to Scale S\ Graham Envn onmental Services, Inc Figure 1 Site Location Map Stillwater Delineation Stillwater, Minnesota GES Project No 2004 028 a,/ -moo 1) ' \ Approximate r . Project er 4151 Location 1 I A N Not to Scale E S Graham Envnonnzental Scrvzcec Inc Figure 2 U S G S Stillwater Quadrangle Stillwater Delineation Stillwater, Minnesota GES Project No 2004 028 1 r 500 0 500 Feet Figure 3.2000 Aerial Photo Stillwater Deluneation Stillwater, Minnesota n Approximate Site Boundary Approximate Wetland Location Approxiamte Transect Location x GES Project No 2004 028 z TM t Not to Scale 1 i i A N Not to Scale 4444 S Graham Envn onmental Services, Inc GE Figure 4 National Wetlands Inventory Stillwater Delineation Stillwater, Minnesota GES Project No 2004 028 A N Not to Scale Legend 454C- Mahtomedi loamy sand (6-12% slopes Typic Udipsamments) GE S '4444 Graham Envrionmental Services, Inc Figure 5 Washington County Soil Survey Stillwater Delineation Stillwater, Minnesota GES Project No 2004 028 j F L Approximate Project Location .%, % . Xr { 1 1' r ' ,1 L,�y L J :.rr rr f, f �% J JJ AL. ed. ! � JJ 1 ▪ % %A 1 . %>0 1+ . } •y 11� �� - S ti jJ+..�I.e.:rJ• ter- f st ti •� ;-. 4. ri rti�t .tis *:t'i { JJ ' `1fti {t L' r • �.f r ! r r r rf% J r �._.: �. .� ti" J , i M is ✓ '` f a ; '} V J e 4•1TTAT r A N Not to Scale Graham Enuenoremental Services, Inc Figure 6 Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Inventory Stillwater Delineation Stillwater, Minnesota GES Project No 2004 028 Wetland A Looking East A N Not to Scale NG S N Graham allllonmental Servtces Inc E, Figure 7 Ground Photo Wetland A Stillwater Delineation Stillwater, Minnesota GES Project No 2004 028 Appendix A t i DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DELINEATION Project Stillwater Delineation Applicant Dick Peterson Delineator GWC Wetland ID A Transect ID Date May 18 2004 County Washington State Minnesota VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland ` Stratum '` % Areal Coverage ` Indicator Status Common Name i Scientific Name Reed canary grass Phalan arundinacea H 70 FACW+ Smartweed Polygonum spp H 5 Ins Ins spp H 5 Sedge Carex spp H 10 Red osier dogwood Corpus stolonifera S <5 FACW Bare ground 10 , v _ Dominant Plant Species Upland _ _ " ` ' f .- r' Stratum rr % Areal Coverage Indicator' Status = ' Common Name k Scientific Name v t Common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica S 30 FACU Box elder Acer negundo T 30 FACW- Reed canary grass Phalans arundinacea H 10 FACW+ White oak Quercus alba T 10 FACU Quaking aspen Populus tremuloides T 10 FAC Stinging nettle Urt►ca dioica H 5 FAC+ Currant Ribes spp H 5 American elm Ulmus amencana T 5 FACW Paper birch Betula papynfera T 5 FACU+ Page 2 Wetland ID A HYDROLOGY — Transect 1, Pit 1 Fla a No A-1 Field Observations Depth of Surface Water NA (in ) Primary Indicators Depth to Free Water in NA Pit (Transect 1) (in ) Depth to Saturated Soil NA (in ) Inundated Saturated in Upper 12 Water Marks Dnft Lines Sediment Deposits Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Wetland Hydrology`Indicators - Secondary Indicators Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches X Water Stained Leaves Local Soil Survey Data X FAC Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Inches Soil Profile WETLAND (Pit 1, Transect 1) (6 feet from flagged boundary) Depth (inches) Horizon - L ' Matrix Color , (Munsell,Moist) d Mottle Colors,, r (Munsell ' MolSt) Mottle Abundance/ Contrast x Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc ", 3 E , , 4 0-4 10YR 2/1 Fine sandy loam 4 12 10YR 5/2 10YR 3/6 Few Fine sandy loam 12 18 10YR 5/1 Fine sandy loam Soil Profile UPLAND (Pit?, Transect 1) (8 feet from flagged boundary) x r " - ,i 0 10 10YR 3/2 Fine sandy loam 10 18 10YR 4/2 Fine sandy loam Hydric So I Indicators , ;,_,,. ', J ,t - 1 i + > Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils X Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydnc Soils List X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydnc Soils List X Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks) WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydnc Soils Present? X Yes X Yes X Yes No No No Cowardin Classification PEMA Is this sampling point within a wetland's X Yes No Remarks Photo Aspect East Number of Flags 10 X Isolated Non -Isolated Describe connection Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director fi-------- Date August 30, 2005 Subject Infill Subcommittee Update Update The Subcommittee of the Planing Commission and Heritage Preservation Commission met on August 29, 2005 to begin discussion of infill design guidelines The result from the infill questionnaire and sample design guidelines from other communities was reviewed The Committee felt the infill assignment had two parts, to educate the community on the significance of the older neighborhood and good design and second to provide guidelines that can be used by developers and the City staff and committees in a design review process The Committee discussed possible consultant assistance and public participation process in developing guidelines This could effect the amount of time to prepare the guidelines and community acceptance of the guidelines The next meeting of the Committee is scheduled for September 12, 2005 before the Planning Commission meeting Dave Peroceschi, Paul Teske and Rob Gag are Planning Commission members on the subcommittee along with Heritage Preservation Commission members Roger Tomten and Jeff Johnson Don Empson, Historic Consultant was also present