Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-02-09 CPC PacketTHE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, February 9, 2004, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of January 12, 2004 AGENDA 1 Case No SUP/04-03 A special use permit for a gymnastics facility located at 1900 Tower Drive in the BP-0, Business Park Office District Bart Roskoski, applicant 2 Case No SUP/04-05 A special permit for Liberty Village retail/office condos located on C15 in VC, Village Commercial District Contractor Properties Developers, applicant 3 Case No PUD-F/04-06 Final PUD approval for Terra Springs, Building 4, 4-level,36- unit condominium located at 640 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District J Buxell Architects, applicant 4 Case No V/04-07 A variance to the street side yard setback (30 feet required, 8 feet requested) for the construction of a 432 square foot, 1-1/2 story addition located at 1521 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District Kirk Roetman, applicant 5 Case No SUB-F/04-08 Final PUD approval for Liberty Village 2"d Addition combining two lots, Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, into one lot, Lot 1, Block 1, 2"d Addition of 42,036 square feet located on CR15 in the VC, Village Commercial District Contractor Properties Developers, applicant 6 Case No SUP/04-09 A special use permit for a retail/takeout area, office area, kitchen production, storage and distribution space located at 1931 Curve Crest Blvd, in the BP-0, Business Park Office District Tasteful Thymes Company, Donna Tarras, applicant Other Items - Boutwell Area Transportation Study - Downtown Streetscape Enhancement Study CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Present Mike Dahlquist, Karl Ranum, Jerry Turnquist, David Peroceschi, Darwin Wald, Paul Teske, Chair Robert Gag, City Council Representative David Junker and Steve Russell, Community Development Director & staff assistant Absent Dave Middleton Mr Gag called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m Mr Gag stated that the order of the agenda was being changed somewhat — the hospital parking ramp discussion would be addressed before the Boutwell/Deerpath traffic study Approval of Minutes Motion to approve the December 8, 2003 minutes by Mr Wald Second by Mr Ranum Vote all in favor PUBLIC HEARINGS 1 Case No SUB/04-01 A Resubdivision of Lots 28, 29, 30, Block 1, Wilkins Addition into two lots Parcel A — 8,026 2 square feet and Parcel B — 8,675 square feet (7,500 square feet minimum) located at 1410 4th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Henry and Corhss Thomas, applicants Mr Corliss explained the request and stated that they always intended to sell the extra property Mr Gag opened the public heanng Jeff Johnson of the Hentage Preservation Commission expressed HPC's concerns that development following the subdivision might not match or conform to the neighborhood character Mr Corhss explained that the character of the neighborhood is very diverse, different style homes and lot/property dimensions Mr Gag closed the public heanng Mr Ranum asked if the applicants understood and met the conditions of approval Motion to approve Case No SUB /04-01 made by Mr Turnquist, second by Mr Ranum Vote all in favor 1 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 2 Case No SUP/04-02 A modification to a Bed and Breakfast special use permit for the relocation of two guest rooms from the main house to the carnage house and for special events (40 guest maximum) located at 306 West Olive Street in the RB, Duplex Residential District Jeff and Julie Anderson, applicants Mr Anderson stated that he and his wife live at 119 West Chestnut Street which is nght around the corner from the Rivertown Inn Bed & Breakfast for which the are seeking this two-part special use permit They currently have a special use permit for nine rooms in the facility and are now seeking permission to take two of those rooms and move them into the carnage house on the property The second part of the request is to permit special events The ongmal request mirrored one already approved for the Aurora Staples Inn and was for six special events per month After appearing before the Hentage Preservation Commission, however, they decided that they did not want to do six special events per month The request has been scaled back to four events per month The events in mind are pnmanly dinners and would be inclusive of the overnight guests This would then permit only 22 additional guests for the special events Since appeanng before the HPC, some concerns from neighbors were expressed about traffic and frequency (6 per month as stated in the notice) if this were allowed The request is being scaled back to 2 special events per month, hoping that this will address the concerns of their friends and neighbors Regarding the first part of the request, construction had already started when the Andersons were notified by the City that they would have to go back through the process The carnage house is currently occupied by the innkeeper and the two rooms being requested are on the north end of the carnage house, one on the upper floor and one on the main floor, replacing the garage area of the carnage house There are 9 parking stalls nght now and there will be room for 11 stalls (one for the innkeeper) Mr Junker asked where the special events would be held and was told they would be in the main house on the main floor, not the carnage house This, in fact, is why the request to move two of the rooms is being made Mr Anderson explained to Mr Wald that the end result will be seven rooms in the main house and two in the carnage house No rooms are being added Mr Junker asked if the Andersons were still comfortable with the 9 00 p m ending time He stated that they were and also with the other conditions that were placed by City staff Mr Ranum asked about the on -site parking or remote parking conditions that were set forth in Condition #2 Mr Anderson stated that this is definitely the most challenging of the conditions Because the property is on a corner and there are already ten parking stalls available in the property, he feels that ten or eleven vehicles would have to park on the street and most of them would actually be abutting the Anderson's property on Fifth and/or Olive Streets In no case would there be more than ten or eleven additional vehicles dunng the special events Mr Junker 2 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 asked if the special events would be scheduled on any particular night of the week and was told it would more likely be on a weeknight than a weekend night Nothing definite has been decided Mr Peroceschi asked how there got to be a guest room in the carnage house in the first place and was told that since the Special Use Permit stated "9 rooms at the facility", the Andersons always thought that it was okay to have some rooms in the carnage house It was news to them that they needed special permission to do so, especially considering that the City issued the building permit It came as a shock to the Andersons when told that construction had to stop A grapery is being built shield any noise and fight from the neighbors to the west and to shield the parking area from the street Mr Peroceschi asked how the Rivertown Inn can have nine rooms when other B&B inns are limited to five The Rivertown Inn was "grandfathered in" Mr Wald questioned how many rooms are operated at once Never more than the 9 rooms have been on the property or operated Mr Wald expressed his concern that even more rooms will be requested in the future Mr Teske questioned what percentage of coverage can exist on a property How much impervious surface is allowable9 Thirty percentage of coverage is allowable in a residentially zoned distnct Mr Russell stated that there are three city lots and according to his calculations, they are in compliance Mr Gag opened the public heanng Jeff Johnson, representing the Hentage Preservation Commission stated they reviewed this request on January 5, 2004 Since then, the special events request has been scaled down to 4 and then 2 per month The site was grandfathered in, has been used as a bed & breakfast inn since the early 80's, with approximately nine units HPC found no objection to the plan to move two of the rooms — not to exceed nine The HPC found that the site is large, being on a corner lot it can accommodate a higher use and has the street frontage to manage the use and it is fairly well screened from the street and neighbors The commission feels that in looking at the ordinance and how it has been interpreted in the past, especially by City Council, that it is compatible with what was approved for the James Mulvey Inn, actually less because no rooms are being added here Also, the special events of up to 40 people was approved for the Aurora Staples Inn and this request is no different The spent of the ordinance, in the opinion of the HPC is pnmanly to utilize these large, histonc homes in Stillwater Many of these, including the Rivertown Inn have been everything from farm houses to apartment buildings This type of use of a big, histonc home, is preferred It is a good and appropnate use of this type of property These properties can produce revenue that will keep them in good condition and on the tax rolls The intent of this request is within the guidelines Mr Johnson mentioned that although his is on the HPC he did abstain from voting because he lives in the vicinity of this B&B 3 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Lino Sullivan, north of the Inn He asked for the commissions support of the Anderson's goals in this project He and his wife feel that the Anderson's have proven to be impeccable neighbors and hosts He has had no complaints about the guests or the operation of the inn He is proud to live in the neighborhood of a classic, Victonan house He feels that every time forty people come to Stillwater and see the gorgeous homes in gorgeous neighborhoods, like this Inn, it increases the value of the entire community He asked the commission to support the Andersons in this venture and if there are any problems to address them immediately He feels they are and will continue to be reasonable and cooperative Leo Lohmer of 303 West Olive stated that whenever problems in the neighborhood came up, everyone worked together to quickly to resolve it He asked Jeff for two things and they were taken care of He does worry that people attending special events could be injured while crossing the street Some dnvers come up the hill as fast as they go down it He is concerned about the 18 or 19 cars that would be involved dunng a special event but if Mr Anderson says he can take care of it, then Mr Lohmer is sure that he will He asked if the old gas storage tank, under the dnveway was ever removed Jim Martin, 225 Chestnut Street West, stated that he is in support of the Andersons' request and believes that any parking concerns he has will be taken care of Katie Keller, 207 Sixth Street South, believe the Rivertown Inn is a good thing for the neighborhood It is being beautifully restored and maintained — a true showplace in Stillwater The clientele it attracts are up -scale and well mannered They have expenenced little or no problems with unruly behavior or noise Concerning the carnage house rooms, they trust that the additional lighting necessary for the handicapped accessible entrance, will be appropnate and not bothersome to them Ms Keller suggested a motion -sensor type of device be put in place so the lights are on an "as needed" basis She expressed senous concern regarding the increase in delivery truck traffic that would result from the special events portion of the request Mr Anderson assured that there would not be a increase in the traffic —just an increase in the amount of food, etc in those trucks She stated that increased parking is a concern and would appreciate that as many cars as possible be parked on site/abutting Anderson property She would like to see information on the dates, number of guests and number of vehicles parked on the streets for each special event would be a useful way for the Rivertown Inn to demonstrate conformance with the special use permit She asked the Planning Commission to require the Rivertown Inn, and others to supply this information and provide a summary in the annual B&B report Mr Russell stated that this has been performed on an irregular basis — on an individual basis when complaints are received This process, as required by ordinance, can be formalized Mr Anderson proposed that every time a special event is scheduled, he would invite a neighbor to monitor and participate in the special event This would relieve the Council and the Planning Commission of that duty and would allow the neighbors and fnends to see what is going on and if they have any concerns, the Andersons would have the chance to address them Ms Keller's 4 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 final concern is that any future owners might run the Inn as a hotel or restaurant Is this special use permit transferable to a future owner/operator other than the Andersons? Mr Turnquist informed her that it is not transferable Judith Lacy, 318 Olive Street West, feels that this affects her more than anyone else She expects to continue to live in a quiet neighborhood and asks the Council to ensure her a reasonable expectation to pnvacy Ms Lacy recited multiple dates and times that her quiet and pnvacy was disturbed by the water heater vent in the Inn She informed the Andersons and they said they would get the sound muffled Their attempts to muffle the sound did not meet with her approval She stated that she continued to call Mr Anderson regarding the problem until he told her not to call again She then registered a complaint with the City A decibel level test was completed and found that the sound did not qualify as a nuisance She hopes that the Andersons will get the noise level under control with a new muffler system being installed within the week After requesting the City's help to alleviate the noise level she is very concerned that there could possibly be two more rooms even closer to her She stated that the innkeeper has been observed stanng into their bedroom windows She wants no more rooms in the carnage house She is upset that no notification was given to her or any of the other neighbors when this latest construction project began She stated that the plans given to the Planning Commission are not the plans that the Andersons are actually using She is upset that she has had to live with all the noise for the last two and one-half years without being able to do anything about it She is concerned about the noise of the guests coming and going late at night Lighting is also disturbing and even though some lovely things have been done to the carnage house, she cannot erect a 20 foot wall between the properties She is looking to the Planning Commission to senously consider the plans, the actual plans before making any kind of decision in this matter She is concerned about her property value when it comes time to sell her home if there is a restaurant/hotel complex nght next door She does not like her family and friends being exposed to the liquor being served next door She asked the Planmng Commission to deny all of the Anderson's requests, at least until the next meeting She is willing to consider allowing the Andersons to have some special events but certainly not 4 times a month and especially not on Sundays That is a day of rest She would like to designate "no parking" in front of her house and in the area of her bedroom window The City should provide signage to that effect She thanked the Commission for their time and consideration Mr Anderson addressed some of the issues brought up by Judy Lacy There are no windows in the carnage house guest rooms visible to the neighbors to the west (Lacys) The grapery structure is designed with the Lacys in mind It reduces their visual observation of both guests and the parking area He has offered to reroute the venting system for the water heater if the new muffler system does not meet with their approval Mr Ranum asked the Anderson's for the total square footage of either the improvements or the entire property 8,200 square feet of house, carnage house and grapery 5 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Kathy Oertle, 118 Fifth Street South thanked Jeff & Julie Anderson for the wonderful restoration and upkeep of the property She appreciates that the special events request was reduced from four a month to two per calendar month She is concerned about the delivery trucks for both the Rivertown Inn and the Stillwater Residence Trucks have backed into her dnveway and broken off branches from their trees Mr Anderson said he will tell delivery dnvers to avoid backing into any of the dnveways to turn around She questioned where all the cars, including staff vehicles, would park She requested a review after six months of special events The commission told her that it would be a yearly review penod Ms Oertle said that most of the neighbors feared being "tattletales" so hesitated to say anything regarding these issues She was informed that issues cannot be addressed if no one is made aware of them Paul Lacy, 318 W Olive Street feels that Mr Anderson really intends to put a restaurant and hotel in the middle of a residential section of town He pointed out that only four of the 15 items on the special use permit were not violated He hopes that if any of the requests are allowed, that it is stipulated that all the events be held inside the main house He cited many lighting violations and signage problems and stated that the outside of the carnage house was completely modified without permission Mr Lacy fears that Mr Anderson is trying to change the character of the neighborhood He is already in violation on the special use permit and now wants more When the Dougherty's made similar requests they were flatly denied He said that no companson should be made to the Aurora Staples Inn or the Mulvey House because the locations are so very different He requested the Planning Commission deny this SUP or at the very least delay any decision Tim Parker, 321 Olive Street West, is interested in a safe, quiet but lively neighborhood He stated that the Andersons keep the neighborhood alive He doesn't know how you could support an histonc property such as this other than converting it to an apartment complex He has never had any parking problems or noise problems because of the Rivertown Inn John Oertle, 118 Fifth Street South, cnticized the lack of enforcement of special use permits and momtonng building activities He feels that the city has let the system fail He does have concerns regarding the lighting of the Rivertown Inn Mr Anderson stated that no matter how important the Inn is to him and his wife, it is nowhere as important as friends and neighbors are The property was restored to share it with the neighborhood The use they are seeking, at least the changes, is consistent with why they bought the property and how they intend to use it They value their friends and neighbors much more than their property 6 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Jeff Johnson, 309 Fifth Street South, (also on the HPC), commends Jeff & Julie Anderson for all that's been done to the property He feels there intent is to operate a business that makes the community better He asks the Commission to look to the requests as an appropnate use for a larger, histonc home, it's consistent with what the City wants as far as preservation is concerned, it makes a viable business that fits fairly well with a busy community/neighborhood The HPC Commission has looked at all of these issues, previous cases and feels that this is consistent with what has been reviewed and approved and is compliance with the permitting process Most building permits would not be subject to a public hearing if the fit within codes and ordinances The Andersons have appeared before the HPC at least 3 times since acquiring the property in 1999 Mr Johnson supports the project and hopes the Planning Commission will grant approval Before closing the public heanng, Mr Gag asked if any questions remained for the applicants Mr Ranum asked Mr Anderson how his property operation/business differs from a restaurant and hotel complex Because of their plans, he feels that there are no changes from what they have been doing all along Mr Ranum stated that there does seem to be more lighting on the property than before Mr Anderson reduced the voltage on the front porch fight and put it on a timer He will take down the outside lighting on the stained glass and take down any and all lighting that is not required by code Mr Gag closed the public heanng Discussion Mr Gag explained that the request would be broken into two separate requests and voted on separately Mr Peroceschi expressed his concern that the City Council had earlier decreed that there would be no rented rooms in the Carriage House and now there are two Mr Ranum is not overly concerned because no additional rooms are being added, just moved The onginal special use permit states 9 rooms, 18 guests Holding the line at 9 rooms/18 guests is his primary goal Mr Wald is concerned that this property has 9 rooms when the code allows 5 rooms He was told by Mr Turnquist that this particular permit was issued pnor to the code Mr Junker agreed that as long as there are no additional rooms, he has no problem with this part of the request Mr Teske has no objection because the carnage house use is not being changed and there will be no increase in the number of vehicles because two rooms are being moved from one building to the other Mr Ranum sees no impact on the site with moving the rooms Mr Dahlquist asked if this decision would affect allowing others to establish residential umts in their carnage house/garages Mr Ranum moved approval of the relocation of two guest rooms from the main house to the carnage house subject to the conditions set forth in the staff recommendations and adding the 7 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 condition that impervious surface coverage on the site not exceed the 40 percent figure that is allowed by current City ordinance Second by Mr Turnquist Discussion Mr Junker asked if any conditions regarding lighting need be added Mr Ranum feels that there are already conditions set on the lighting and it is for the City to review and enforce compliance Mr Dahlquist questioned the impervious surface condition He stated that there is already hard surface under the addition of the grapery so is not sure that there are changes to the existing impervious surface Mr Ranum reiterated that checking for compliance is necessary Vote 6 to 4 in favor Mr Wald and Mr Peroceschi dissenting Motion passed The second part of the request is permission to hold special events in the main residence The Andersons request to offer dinners to a maximum of 40 guests per event These events would be conclude by 9 00 p m The events would be based on a reservation only basis and be defined as business meetings, bus tours, bndal and wedding showers, anmversanes, weddings and wedding receptions and church functions Mr Teske expressed concerns regarding the parking problems that already exist in the neighborhood from both the Inn and the Stillwater Residence Allowing special events, even if only 2 per month, would escalate the problems It is clearly stated that no off -site parking that would affect the neighborhood, is allowed Mr Ranum is "flat-out" not in favor of the special events Parking for the events, accessibility for neighbors to their own parking, the noise factor with coming and going of up to 40 guests and the fact that this would be more like a - hotel/restaurant (not a proper use in a neighborhood) are all his deciding factors Mr Junker likes the aspect of the vitality this operation bnngs to the neighborhood He is definitely in favor of this He is concerned that some of the neighbors felt that if they voiced their opinions then they would be considered "tattle tales" He stressed the importance of expressing specific complaints to the City so they can be addressed immediately There is also the yearly review for these concerns If no one complains, then the City is under the assumption that there are no problems — "no news is good news" In turn, it is important to hear that all is fine He feels that the Andersons are very in tune with neighborhood concerns and are willing to compromise to address concerns Since the SLIP is nontransferable he is definitely in favor of this Mr Russell stated that it is important to clarify the requirements If you want the special events to be confined to the intenor of the main house then state that specifically If additional parking is to be restncted to either on -site or at a controlled, remote location then adhere to that condition He feels that this hasn't been discussed even though it is listed as item 2 in the staff recommendations for approval If that i If it is two special events per calendar month, then state "calendar month" in the permit Also, state that the special use permit will be reviewed by the Planning Commission in January of 2005 so everyone will have the opportunity to attend and 8 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 review how the first year has gone This gives everyone the chance to participate and express their opinions without feeling they are complainers Mr Peroceschi favors momtonng of the special events as Mr Anderson offered — guest monitors compnsed of neighbors Mr Dahlquist feels that the controlled, remote location parking will be as detnmental to the neighborhood as on street parking A maximum of 2 special events per Discussion to stnke item #2 from the conditions of approval Mr Ranum stated this permit is up for yearly review and that it can be reviewed upon complaint Therefore, rather than the Planning Commission being specific in the parking conditions, the applicant must find some solution to the parking issues He should leave with the knowledge that he should be attending to parking issues so he is not looking at complaints which would bnng them up for review Mr Turnquist moved approval of the special events portion of SUP/04-02 with the following changes to the conditions listed in the staff recommendation Condition #1 changed to read a maximum of two special events per calendar month Condition #2 be stnked Conditions #3 through 10 be retained Add Condition #11 to read that the noise from the water heater be reduced and feasible Add Condition #12 stating that this SUP will be reviewed by the Planning Commission in January of 2005 Reword Condition #7 to read all special events are to be held indoors Second by Karl Ranum Discussion Mr Peroceschi addressed the concerns of Mayor Kimble that this would become another restaurant, not simply a Bed & Breakfast Inn Mr Wald stressed that the limit of 2 special events per calendar month was "iron -clad" Vote 4 in favor, 4 against Motion denied Mr Turnquist, Mr Wald, Mr Teske and Mr Junker in favor Mr Ranum, Mr Dahlquist, Mr Peroceschi, and Mr Gag opposed Mr Russell stated that this may be appealed as a separate issue Mr Gag called a short recess at 9 25 p m Reconvene at 9 40 p m 9 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Other Items -Review of revised parking facility plans (Lakeview Hospital) Mr Jeff Robertson, Lakeview Hospital Administrator, presented the revised parking plans Mr Peroceschi asked if any changes were made since the City Council meeting and the initial presentation to the Planning Commission on October 13 Mr Robertson stated that the parking ramp size is reduced by 2700 square feet overall The exits on Everett Street decreased from four to one An internal transition from the upper level to the lower level is incorporated into the design Everett Street will no longer be used as a transition from one level of the ramp to the other level The setbacks along Everett Street increased from 37 feet to 77 feet and from 49 feet to 56 feet on the south side Earth berms were added between Everett Street and the parking lot Screening with walls as well as landscaping is now a part of the design Keeping as many of the existing trees as possible is a goal of the design They have also agreed to put a bnck facade matching the rest of the hospital on the south side of the ramp and the screening walls The neighbors across the street and directly south of the ramp are invited to take part in the detailed landscaping to ensure it meets with their approval The neighbors did request that one condition be removed from the seven conditions sent to the City Council The neighbors requested the hospital give the city a walking path easement to the south of the ramp but no longer want that Mr Robertson feels that many different options to the ramp were explored and that the concerns of the neighborhood have been taken into consideration - - Mr Gag asked to see the original drawings along side of the new plans and specifications Mr Teske asked about the walking path easement and the neighbors' request to remove this item The neighbors expressed concerns regarding vandalism and partying in this sheltered area Mr Peroceschi stated that this type of activity was reported before so the path would probably make no difference now He also expressed his concern if there is too much vegetation planted for screening Mr Robertson displayed a drawing depicting the screening plan Mr Ranum asked what the "15 Foot" marking, painted on the red house indicates He was told that that indicates the height of the structure relative to the height of the red house The top of the structure will actually be lower than the existing house A security arm will be used at the Greeley Street entrance to prevent non -hospital personnel from using the ramp as a cut -through to Churchill or Everett Streets Mr Junker was told that the road width is 20 feet and will have two lanes 10 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Mr Gag invited the public to speak about the plans Tom Sherber of 1121 South Everett stated that the whole process has been confusing He commended Mr Robertson for being able to convince the community that the need for this ramp and the benefits outweigh the 80 to 90 signatures on a petition opposing it It outweighed the concerns regarding the traffic, air pollution, light pollution, noise pollution, and it outweighed a 9 to 0 vote of the Planning Commission He remarked that somehow people were led to believe that if the hospital did not get approval for this ramp that the hospital would leave He is concerned that the next time the hospital wants something that this (implied) threat will surface again He thanked the Planning Commission for their understanding and support although it was overturned Rich Soderholm of 1128 Everett Street South is concerned about storm water runoff Drainage will actually be greatly improved Drains from the ramp and open parking lots will divert water to two different holding ponds, not directly into Brick Pond Dr Karen Hofstrand of 1204 S Everett Street expressed her sadness about the decision and her concerns regarding light pollution She would like some guarantee that lights will be turned off when not in use She also stated that she would not want a walking path on the south side of the parking structure — it would likely cause more problems Mary Soderholm of 1128 S Everett Street expressed her concerns regarding the type of natural screening to be planted between her property and the parking structure She plans to taking part in the decision process She, too, does not want a walking path to be included in the plan Stuart Glaser, 1103 Everett Street South thanked the hospital for inviting lum to participate in the landscape design He is saddened by the City Council's decision in this matter and is disappointed that zoning ordinances did nothing to protect their neighborhood Mr Ranum asked Mr Glaser what changes he would most like to see in the plans He stated that the 15 foot boulevard is pretty narrow and does not know how large of a tree can be planted in that much limited space He doesn't know where the snow will go when plowed — will it slide back off the berm into the street? Mr Glaser also expressed his concern about headlights shining into their house He does not want a walking path between Greeley and Everett Streets Mr Sherber regrets that the neighborhoods ongmal plan for the parking ramp was rejected by the hospital He feels that this would have obtained unanimous approval from the neighbors yet was not presented to the Planning Commission or to City Council He also talked about the importance of the types of trees, not merely the size of the trees being planted Deciduous trees do not provide much coverage in the winter He wants the hospital to commit to the planting plan now 11 City of Stillwater Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2004 Mr Gag stated the Planning Commission is charged with reviewing the City Council's approval, the results of subsequent meetings and to make recommendations on some of the changes Mr Junker recommended removing condition #6 — pedestnan trail easement shall be provided connecting Everett Street to Gieeley Street Mr Teske recommended retaining the easement nghts for the future but not developing a trail at this time Mr Ranum asked how auto headlights will be screened from the neighbors to the south and east Mr Robertson stated that 3 % foot high walls in combination with landscaping will shield the headlights from the neighbors Mr Turnquist recommended adding an eighth condition for approval — Residents shall be involved with landscaping decisions/changes both now and in the future Mr Junker enhanced this recommendation further to include addressing the vehicle lighting situation Mr Ranum recommended it read "landscaping plan shall involve resident input concerning and including vehicle lighting and the screening of it Mr Russell suggested having the Hentage Preservation Commission review the final fighting and landscape plans and invite the neighbors Mr Ranum moved approval of the revised plans as presented to the Planning Commission including the conditions set forth on page 2 of the staff memo dated November 26, 2003 with the addition of Condition #8 — the landscaping plans -shall involve resident input and concerns regarding vehicle lights and additional screening thereof to the site Condition #9, Final fighting and landscape plan shall be reviewed by the Hentage Preservation Commission with inclusion of concerns directed at vehicle headlights and containment of on -site lighting Second by Mr Turnquist Vote all in favor -Continued discussion of Boutwell Area Traffic Study (Deerpath/Bnck) Mr Junker recommended tabling this discussion to another date He, along with Robert Gag, felt that this issue deserves its own meeting After discussion,_the meeting was rescheduled for Thursday, January 22nd at 6 30 p m Mr Turnquist moved to adjourn the meeting at 11 05p m Second by Mr Dahlquist Vote all in favor Respectfully submitted, Kathy Rogness Acting Recording Secretary 12 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/04-03 Planning Commission Date February 9, 2004 Project Location 1900 Tower Drive Comprehensive Plan Distnct Business Park Office Zoning District BP-0 Applicants Name Bart Roskoslu Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Descnption A Special Use Permit to operate a gymnastics facility — Flips Gymnastics Discussion The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a gymnastics facility The budding is an existing office/warehouse at the above address There is a 1,400 square foot office and a 9,080 square foot warehouse Flips Gymnastics will occupy the entire building The applicant estimates that there will be approximately 200 students a week They will employ about 10 people part-time The activities of the business will include a Gymnastics lessons — preschool gymnastics for children ages 18 mos To 5 yrs old Recreational gymnastics for children ages 5 yrs To 14 yrs old b Birthday parties c ProShop d Inflatable Rentals Hours of operation are Monday — Fnday are as follows a One preschool class of six students every 45 minutes from 10 am to 1 pm b Monday — Friday classes from 4 pm to 8 30 pm c Saturday classes from 9 am —12 pm and birthday parties from 3 pm to 6 pm d Sunday birthday parties from 12 pm to 6 pm The parking provided on site is 20 spaces They will be leasing 17 spaces from the neighbor to the east, Heritage Printing The applicant states in the attached letter that most of the activity is pick up and drop off The applicant has been operating another Flips Gymnastics in White Bear Lake for 15 years and will continue to do so along with the proposed new one The business in White Bear Lake is much larger than the one proposed for Stillwater Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 Applicant shall have a long-term contract that provides for required parking off site This contract shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 No additional signage Findings The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant and Building Owner/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings 01/05/2004 11 57 6514308810 CITY OF STILLWATER PACE 02 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 1' 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STIU.WATER MN 55062 Case No I / P i03 Sle d ed WILL' ' Fee Paid ilWo- Receipt No. , ACTION REQUESTED SpedaVConditlonal Use Permit Variance RssubdNtslon Subdivision' __Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment' Planning Unit Development' Certificate of Compliance The lies for requested action are attached to this application "An escrow lire is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering !lees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of ail forms and supporting material suMr ltfed In connection with any application All supporting material (1 e, photos, sketches, eta) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sbcteen (16) copies of supporting material is required lfapplication is strrbvn1tted to the city Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting rnaterial is required. A site plan is required with applications. Any Incomplete eppllcaton or supporting material will delay the applkatfon process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project I / 00 l ow ER Q (4 , Assessors Parcel No 3 20 3 o Z o14- 3 oo (GEO Code) Zoning Oishict 13 P - 0 Desc ripbon of Project Nn A/1c4J GdNJT Rd CTIO A/ O 2 Al/rat pT/0n1 S 4rn'i Vidnri r,02 ( Pgatel iT 70 OP,61ZAM. ,'W Tic S /=AC /Gl r 9 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be &w and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used PrdPerty Owner R- A/ I<F_N/V6 i y,k KENNitie',resentative ga RoS Ws1'-t Meiling Address 1100 TbW eR p (Z Mailing Address 3Sbs Co/ irn,orce U I vd City - State - zip wh /,R Bear Zc,kr,flA/SS1 Telephone No (SI- 777-'/7 76, Signature d) (Signature Is required) city - state - zip ci/LC(.t)Air& //IN St° 9a Telephone No (631) C/' 3 C/ - o 9- / Signature (Signature Lot Size (dimensions)I, .x ZZS Land Area 3 0,3 -7 S sa Ft Height of Buildings Stories Principal f Acoessory N/A. SIT Feet 19 ItVacriarriara‘shela\PLANAPPYRM May 1, 2003 E AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area, / O 14-8 0 square feet q-Q Existing /a,a square feet Proposed 0 square feel Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces 3 7 7- if /Act (ASS Aura kip/ 6 MJi4 L.-icn F2rn� Nttnnnad. paINT/N 6 OU LOT ■ ■ 2 s 1 • A 9 • sU USED • A 2 131 a STILLWATER 0911443E P01C010 EASEAEM BUC ffiS1 W 2 • • 1.211 • KERN-PAUL Y ADDIT] CD CO 10 • of co TOWER DRIVE Cj • ta^ 7 • ►, A tiiy ✓' oi, s 0 Location Map • 910 -RAP-AGE man, OVER HD OF 01 loaf II,EARTLAN CIC 144 Y ADDITION ss 41 OBIS STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK OUTLOTF • r MN DOT R/W PLAT NO 82 84"1;;T 13 • HWY PARCEL B HAN PARCEL nAml (00a) R_I W T7?1 17IN 17ON TAN TAN P7N R-OW R19W IL_W R_IW R_OW Vicinity Map 0 224 Scale in Feet Tho am, P. a ranol— .�aolooDoloo ofWOnos. an— Te:M.Yc fls&rdonoo OM DO, Plaicoolft or -0_ Bea W.61.0.1.1.1/ ,T.aBu Ro.(p 101160 AZO nnalso atom BW�1RP—OWAt 11AOPMm be/Y K3m1 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/04-05 Planning Commission Date February 9, 2004 Project Location New England Place in Liberty Village Comprehensive Plan Distnct Village Commercial Zoning District VC Applicants Name Jay Felder — KFPWR Properties Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Descnption A Special Use Permit for Liberty Village retail/office stnp center Discussion The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to construct an 18, 878 total square foot (first floor is 10,911 square feet) retail/office strip center The center has been designed have a small town village character about it The facade will be composed of many individual storefronts, each storefront will have bay windows Some buildings will have awnings, others will not, this will break up the front of the building The center is designed to be compatible with all the architecture in the area The siding material (Hardiboard) used will replicate the appearance of wood All mechanicals will be hidden on the roof The trash receptacles will be constructed with the same materials as the buildings (see a-4 1) There will be four light standards, they will look like the old carriage lights (see R-1) The antique "gooseneck" fixtures will be used to -light the signs- -Some signs will be wall signs and some signs will be projecting signs - The landscape plan is part of the continuous plan for the entire area Some of the proposed tenants at the writing of this report are a coffee shop, hair salon, gift shop, a martial arts business and a wine and spirits shop The proposed uses are consistent with the zoning requirements of the Village Commercial District Recommendation Approval with conditions 1 Conditions of Approval 2 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 3 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 4 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 5 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 6 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and matenals of the project 7 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during construction activity 8 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 9 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 10 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction dunng the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 11 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 12 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 13 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 14 A lighting plan showing the building fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted for Hentage Preservation approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles 15 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Hentage Preservation Commission 16 All security lights on building shall be downlit 17 A sign permit is required for signage 18 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Community Development Director Findings The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings/Landscape Plan/Lighting Plan Jan 16 04 09 59a JAY AND DONELL FEIDER 651-735-3020 CITY OF STILLWATLu P 2 PAGE 02 12/02/2003 14 20 6514308810 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 tease No Date Filed Fee Paul Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Vananie Resubdivislon SubdMsion* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development* Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application 'An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Ali supporting material (: e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes fhe property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (1 8) copies of supporting material is required If applicatron Is submitted to fhe City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting mafenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project VAC4,107 10110 Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Description of Project 1 (G"edVIVIL••-e) "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct l further certify 1 will comply wits the permit If it is granted and used " Property Ownerf_ottrgi b1 ' .O V i i~R$ Mailing Address VISIRTE tit city- State - Zip_ RO6SUIU.E. itita I i3 Telephone No (p5I - 55CD 4521 Signature Representative KFPWR 'PeTt5 Mailing AddressJ11_V City - State - Zip U JBuRY l_MN 55_iZr? Telephone No Signature 12423 5441 Pre (Signature Is required) (S gnature is required) Lot Size (dimensioqs � x ,A ` Land Area 4142. SIB Height of Buildings Stories Pnncipal Z. H Vnaiamara\shellAPIANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION I' Total Building floor area 43 219 P square fe Existing 0 - square feet Proposed Z3Z b(Q square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces 51 FL R^ W R19ve ILW 9.IW R W Vanity Map 0 285 Scale in Feet T__ --d m.em d Pope= -, —WI n...0ad�wmsY bioWp' Grey lweds tao Ae.(t! Ims over W�r�s/3�el.ws awn Vmp% ae..ar >® Yap pm. r+ra NM t k architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118 E 26th Street Suite 300 Mpls MN 55404 P 612 879 8225 F 612-879 8152 wwwtanek com January 23, 2004 Liberty Retail and Office Lofts Project Description Liberty Retail and Office Lofts project is designed to incorporate the imagery and mood of the small town village A significant source of inspiration for the project can be found in the small towns all along the St Croix River The Manne on the St Croix is a particular strong reference project The project includes both retail and professional spaces In order to capture the spirit of the small town village, we have developed a facade with unique and individual storefronts Each storefront takes orr a unique character which is reflected in each of the individual uses Overall the project creates a dynamic streetscape that is perfectly tailored for walking and window shopping The project will bring together the other buildings which surround the public square It will also provide many necessary services that the neighborhood will need The project is designed around the concept of a dense urban type project The project is located along the sidewalks coming from the housing developments It is the combination of automobile traffic and pedestrian traffic that will make this project successful The intention of the project is to utilize parking from across the entire retail association This will add to and create the atmosphere of an urban area with people parking in one location and walking from store to store Someone coming to visit the shops might stop first at the bank but then walk over to the coffee or gift shop With easy and convenient access this will be a reality The design will maintain a simple appearance with classic bay window displays and decorative brackets holding unique signage The construction will utilize Hardiboard to replicate the traditional and warm appearance of wood construction Utilizing a simple palette of materials and colors will create the charm and character of the small town village We look forward to creating this new town village at Liberty Sincerely, Nathaniel Shea NCARB, A 1 A , Principal Tanek, Inc FROM FAX NO 6517678696 n 24 2004 03 47AM P2 MONDO MANACCEMENT 1 /23/04 Project Liberty Retail, Liberty Office Lofts Dear Sue We would like to offer the latest information available regardmg the potential Tenant mix for our retail/office project, whuh will be known as I 'berty Village Retail and Liberty Office Lofts Mondo Management will be providing the Leasing and Sales Services for the Project We have received numerous inquiries for possible Tenancy within our project„ As we approach a final version of our building plans, we are preparing to pre -lease our space We would like to obtain a conditional use permit that would allow us to accommodate the following potential uses, Coffee Shop (Retail) Bakery/Deli (Retail) Cafd Restaurant with Bccr/Wnne (Retail) Tanning Salon (Lofts or Retail) Flower Shop (Retail) Take and Bake Pizza (Retail) Dry Cleaner (Retail) Jeweler (Lofts or Retail) Wine and Sptnts (Retail) Gift Shop (Retail) Lawyer's office (Lofts) Accounting Office (Lofts) Full Service Barber (Retail) Full servx.e Beauty Salon (Retail) Children's Barber (Retail) FROM FAX NO 6517678696 Jan 24 2004 03 47AM P3 Dentist/Orthodontist (Lofts or Retail) Real Estate Office (Lofts) Mortgage Company (Lofts) Ice Cream Shop (Retail) Nail Salon (Retail) Architect's Office (Lofts) Clothing Store (Retail) Our intention is to offer the main level of our building as "FOR 1 EASE" only space The Upper or Loft level would be available as "FOR SALL" Loft Condominiums We anticipate a total of 15-20 Tenants including both levels Elevator service will be available to our upper floor We would ask that the conditional use pernut allow "General Office" uses to be permitted on the Loft level whether on our initial list or not We understand that any other uses not on our approved list would have to receive permission prior to Tenancy Thank you for your consideration We are looking forward to adding another high quality building project to the City of Stillwater Please feel free to call with any questions or concerns Sincerely, 4/4,g Wallis Principal Mondo Management, L L C RESOLUTION NO 2003-86 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CONCEPT APPROVAL FOR LIBERTY VILLAGE WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 15, 2003 at 7 00 p m in the Council Chambers of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota ("City"), the Council met to consider the original Planned Unit Development permit for the Liberty Development included a village commercial center at the intersection of County Roads 15 and 12 and, in furtherance of that designation, the area was zoned Village Commercial and design guidelines were adopted and included as part of the Orderly Annexation Agreement between the Town of Stillwater and the City of Stillwater, dated August 16, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Developer applied for PUD concept approval for the design of the entire 11 87 acre Village Commercial Distnct and the Director of the Planning Commission determined that the application was complete, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the concept approval on March 17, 2003, and thereafter the Joint Board, comprising members of the Town of Stillwater and the City of Stillwater, reviewed the application at a public heanng held on April 2, 2003 and both the Planning Commission and the Joint Board unanimously approved the application for PUD concept approval, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Stillwater opened the public heanng and heard testimony on the application and thereafter closed the hearing and adopted the following resolutions 1 That Planned Unit Development concept approval is hereby granted for 11 87 acres of the Village Commercial Distnct located in the Village Commercial Zoning Distnct on the southeast corner of County Road 15 and 12, subject to the following conditions a that the Village Commercial design guidelines, land use and parking standards must be used to guide future final Planned Unit Development lot development with regard to each use b that a Special Use Permit, as well final PUD permit approval, must be obtained so as to permit design review for each individual lot Adopted by affirmative vote of all members of the City Council this 15th day of Apnl, 2003 • • PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGNMJDDI l Atm6 FEAR�p,ECTURE o GRAPl ncD�crl • Al urEcrut awsrrA CN TO Mr Steve Russell CC Liberty Village, Homer T, CPDC REGARDING Planned Unit Development Apphcation Narrative NEIGHBORHOOD Liberty on the Lake MUNICIPALITY Stillwater, Mn DATE FROM February 28, 2003 Marc Putman, A R.0 Member L Arch, pnnapal Putman Planzung & Design LIBERTY VILLAGE 1 CONSISTENCY OF PLAN FROM FIRST LIBERTY ON THE LAKE CONCEPT Liberty Village was conceived to provide the convenience shopping, office, dining and meeting opportunities common to Traditional Neighborhoods of our past This, to strengthen the cohe- sive nature of Liberty's neighborhoods The village stores were part of the original Liberty on the Lake site plan to also reduce burdens on perimeter highways for resident local, daily needs, purchases, errands that otherwise would require and longer driving, and added crowding to these larger volume roads Liberty Village was also designed m response to the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning , providing a needed local source for fuel, convenience groceries, banking, dining/pub/deli, office and professional services for the city, township and county residents 2 SHOPS ON THE VILLAGE SQUARE Liberty Village's site plan calls for a store design not common in the era of "strip commercial" shopping While the site at Liberty on the Lake's Northwest comer fronts on both highway 15 and 12, the shops will also onent "m" to the com- muruty/neighborhood This places added tasks on the design of the buildings and individual shop owner/operators floor plans, not unhke many stores m downtown Stillwater 3 CIRCULATION SYSTEM, TWO WAY ROADS, ON -STREET PARKING Liberty Village's site plan and road configuration has been studied, many alternates proposed and drawn, reviewed by traffic engineers, debated and re -reviewed numerous times 4 THE POND IN LIBERTY SQUARE With the recent refinement of the storm water runoff volume calculations, the central pond within Liberty square has been relieved of storm water storage "duty", and will be able to have a more stable water level, that is just 4 feet below the elevation of the perimeter street elevation Use of the above discussed boulder walls will allow the water to be brought doser to both the gazebo/pavilion and the sitting area south across the street from the bank A floating, tit, fountain will help provide visual focus and be an attractive amenity, drawing park visitors to both the park, pavilion and the bordering shops 5 ANTICIPATED USES OF LIBERTY VILLAGE The master site plan uses Liberty Square to both separate, buffer, but also link the "shops on the green" to the homes, townhomes and the residents The grading and position of the pavilion anticipate a vanety of park uses and functions The large open turf area, in addition to being an attractive, shaded park, will provide ample space for informal audience seating dunng musical groups and performances "Flea" market, farm- ers' market uses are also potentials We understand that the City receives requests that it can not fulfill with current park locations The gazebq pavilion will offer shelter for performers, while benches and game tables, both under and around the shelter, will also allow for casual daytime and evening conversation over- looking the pond and water fountain to the north In winter, there is a potential for this struc- ture to provide shelter for ice skaters The retairung walls and steps to the water will permit winter access for this skating, and in summer, could allow activities such as model (radio con- trol) boat/sail boat races for kids of all ages 6 BUILDING DESIGN Because each building must face both the penmeter and provide a welcoming front on Liberty Village, the Architectural Guidelines require each owner/business operator to respond with plans and designs and operational activity that is compatible 7 SHARED PARKING for CITY PARK USERS Parking space quantities and ratios include the use of on -street spaces shown on the site plans Liberty Village is a stand-alone Village Commercial area without the hkehhood of expansion m size From the initial concept plan drawn over 5 years ago, the sharmg of parking spaces was always anticipated between com- mercial users, employees, park users and residents (if upper level residential uses are provid- ed) 8 LIMITATION ON BUILDING USES To help assure sufficient parking of those who dnve (and park) to use Settlers Park, Liberty Square and the adjacent trail system, Building 8 will be limited to office use, day care use (within covenant restrictions), and potential upper level res- idential use potenhal May -Aug limitations on hours of operation may be put in place as needed This, to provide sufficient week end parking spaces for City Park users 9 BUILDING AREAS * Square Footages are based on Liberty Village Concept Site Plan and Prehm Plat, and may vary at final site plan and final building plan approval apphcahon. 10 PARKING SPACE RATIOS ratios of parking spaces per 1000 square feet of building area required for categones of building use (ie 5 1 5 spaces per 1000 sq ft ), will conform to City - required amounts, the most restnchve ratios being the retail ratio of 51 and restaurant at 101 Where office or reszdentzal uses are planned, a method, acceptable to the City, of restricting the portions of buildings, (or whole buildings) so designated, will be part of the final approval If time limit and form of use limit is acceptable to City, applicable parking ratio(s) that may be lower than the generalized calculations (ie , 5 1) shown on the Parking Data chart can be applied and modify allowable building main and upper floor areas This information must then be part of subsequent purchase agreements & Association proceedings 11 ADEQUACY OF SPACES, "PROOF OF PARKING" DATA We must have enough park- mg Yet, we also should avoid having too many parking spaces, for the size and types of uses for the buildings and owner -businesses We also want to "build -in" the flexibility of building design, features and sufficiency of parlung to enable a variety of businesses to succeed at Liberty Village, over time The parking ratios, (and, therefore the parking space quantities provided) are conservative, for they apply (per City standards) to gross floor areas, not the common net leasable floor areas We propose, that, consistent with the PUD cntena of the Village Commercial zone, if sufficient and credible evidence shows that less than the number of spaces speafied in the City's gener- al ordinances are actually needed to allow the specific business to operate properly, then choic- es can be considered 1 The number of spaces required will be reduced for that particular building, or 2 The building floor area can be increased, or, 3 Another proximate building may be increased in size, by using the surplus spaces These potential increases in building size will not be allowed if they compromise the aesthetics or operational flexibility of the sidewalks and streetscape 12 EMPLOYEE PARKING Employee parking will be designated, and shall not use any on - street parking spaces This, to help provide an ample supply of short term parking spaces to encourage patronage of Liberty Village businesses, accessed from the Liberty Square side 13 AGREEMENTS FOR JOINT USE OF PARKING While some spaces for each build- ing/business operator will be reserved via agreement and signage, most spaces will be open to all users, as is common to most suburban shopping settings Purchase agreement clauses and Liberty Village Business Operators Association" covenants and guidelines will identify mutu- al use agreements covering parking spaces, o ens ace use, mamtenance obligations and P P PCity- Association maintenance and use responsibilities, park reservation mechanisms, etc ---"117 14 SIGNAGE, REFUSE ENCLOSURES, TRAILS AND IMAGE Liberty Village is bounded by trails on both the north and west sides, and the master site plan anticipated connections to these trails, leading into Liberty Village Other functional necessities of a commercial village include the need for sufficient signage to inform the primary buyers (those dnvers passing by on Manning avenue and Hwy 12) of the services and products offered within Liberty Village This is particularly important for Liberty Village since it is trying something new to the contemporary commercial market place stores that face both "m and out" Aware of the less than attractive settings that can result from straight buildings and straight rows of parking backing up to a highway, we have sought to design interest and visibility mto the plan Using the refuse dumpster enclosure -garages as another opportunity to show the New England architectural style, the plan shows these structures flanking the trail entry A trellis ele- ment with sign identifying Liberty Village offers a trail gateway The surfaces of these structures provide mounting for in -character signage, identifying businesses, services and products Picket fences attached aid in screening the cars parked beyond Other locations for signage, consistent with the Liberty Design Guidehnes are designated on the site plan Agreements for the shared use of these signage locations will be integrated into the owner/ operator and Association agreements 15 PLANTING PLANS The perimeter planting provides both screening of parking, overstory trees, and openings to preserve visibility of the shops and businesses Along both external park- ing bays and around Liberty Square, boulevard trees are provided to create an attractive "main street" scene 16 FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS Final site plans may be refined to include added parking spaces, and/or future potential, additional spaces via diagonal parking, added retain- ing walls, etc Building footprints may vary from those shown on the site plan but not to the point where they limit future sidewalk (seating) uses and flexibility in marketing Such refinements must meet intent of Architectural Guidelines and receive Architectural Review Committee and Architectural Control Comnuttee approval before City Applications BUILDING POTENTIAL NUMBER LAND USES MAUI FLOOR Lunnl. FC TAia'; UPPLR tr.vct j p�ap pr 12e0.Laooree 5apa¢es/10o0o.L al Rename na lit,. a IICCS o: 'sog:i8a�'"dl.. norod sat:once . IOIAI. IwnnuICI +SUU/RI° r LIi1TAC‘C' 4,1201" HEOtKING PARKING RATIOS WA wow: st ,pig e.� al REWIRED P NINO' CFACES: 20 +MBkiiirf spACF.•s p�S�gpEH 20 PAI�KIDR; BATIK pnOVIUE� 561 BUILDING' run, CONVENIENCE GROCERY,PHOTO ) • 1 nl A R It t T CAR WASH — 4120 Moparaaanna d4 - BUILDING OrrrcC, SLR�'ICF, i 2 ,,..„..N., I',\t Tnlf.h T,orTION5 RETAIL"]-.B,965 4150 6,200 9300 15166 18,295 Rena 6 mamma v. wd'¢a;on.' owarr /5 ' wed.,e.r2 qaa mlgar._ 71 76 71 to BUILDING' 4FrIcE, il:rlcC,rla.0 i rlolrasTONAL, RC MIL, 3 r AI'ARI':\IF.NT Or !IONS 108 41 aft olrelal. oitke8pd res. pis L720 a wawa pr TR6.Id. 7.l 2 ga.dap.,mnL BUILDING oANa;, OFFICE; stl;vlcl�, 4 I'ROFLSSIONAI, RETAIL, 4,850 na na 4 850 p' ae° Ica pre .'�aa�a { j mat 24 24 51 BUILDING RESTAURANT,ur'11, 5 p,.i, WITH DCr:lc C Sri)!:VALK VINING • Ol'TIANS 5,458 na na 5458 10 1 54 58 11 6 1 BUILDING Orricc, stroict, 6 t' I: ' F F' S I O N A 1., RE .'FA l l, U,\ItrnlfNT OrnUNS 2,080 2 080 4160 apse.':tea Opn�. � l�.es. 1RC goa.y Rrldrdid I apr.WaprYlwd 20 22 53 1 BUILDING Orr10E,SE1;1'ICC, I'ItOFISSIUNAL, I;t• I A11, . 7 AI'ARTML\T •rl'll)NS 2,400 2400 2400 to ' 4800 parrs s5rn q » ' e°e spacaaraparraBUILDING 24 24 5 1 OFFICk, SERPICL, . A l'I;UFLSSIONAI., LXJ n••Inrrvd UA1' CARE, AIARTMICNT OI'IIONS 4,700 2,800 7500 , 0 11,400) y tool e"°.'� > '�P. d0..°n°er7 q.co-Jgvall t 38 38 51 10 333 1 erty iliage .' • totals 32, 573 43,654'- 53 083' 251 IOL5 262 1o1°'e"°' NOTES 1 Square Foolages are based on Ubyly Village Concept Site Plan and Prelim Plat and may vary at final site plan and tina budding plan approval app katlon, 'Pang ratios tor antietpated uses w® conform to sboVe City required amaunlsC he moll resldeOva ratios being the retail ratio of 51 and restaurant at b I pdenllaty adjusted by "proof d parking' require/nerds d epecitlo ownerroperatorit. Where office and1ar resIderdlal uses are planned, a method acceptable to lho City d restrkung the poruos of buildings. (or whole bund- b 9) to designated, lvif be pad d the Mal apprbVaL Areas d main Dior and upper floods) can calculated rasing apptianbte pealing mib(s). 3. Parldng hallos are oorrservanve, for they apply (per Cry standards) to gross Door areas, nal ne4 poor areas. 4 Parking space quantities and rages Include oh.streel spears ahoam on the elle pans. Liberty Wlage is a stand-alone vigage Commercial area. Sharing d parking spaces Is anitelpated belviebn oormmerd l users` employees, park users and residents (11 upper level residential uses are provided) Building 8 wlm be limited 10 dike day care (wnhln covenant restrictions) and pdc1111a1 upper level realdenit0L May -Aug. &Matrons on hours d operation maybe put In place as needed 10 provide sulklenl week end parking spaces for Gay Park users Employee park Ind will be designated, and enforced and shall not use any on►atreel parking spaces. 5. Final ello parrs may bo'dined to include added parldng spaces, andtor future pdon0al addlional spaces via diagonal parking added relahNAg walls. do. Such ;alinements must meet Intent of Architectural Guidelines and redeye Arehlectwat Review ComrtDtae and Archledural Ccand Commllee approval before City Applkalbns. 0. Purchase agreement clauses and liberty Village Business Operators Association' Covenants antUror guideMes Will Identity mutual use egreemelde covering parking spaces openspace use maintenance obllgalloro and City-Assodldlon mandenance and Use respastemnes. park reservation mechanisms. eta LIBERTY VILLAGE PARKING DATA MARL. PUTMAN L ARCH PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN/ DDI 2.62001 2 20 2003 REV March 5, 2003 uatsaa B 2utuuejd 6289-18E-STG taek Q`pCEM4k$ "Tbe spirit o f a New En@(anO Viffage" Prepared for: Pozitive Development On behalf of: _CPDC CPDC Caitrafa Prqpaty Denzlq:esCcrriccny 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www. tanek. corn COVER LIBERTY VILLAGE I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota. name date license number: project # scale: name: CITY REVIEW 1/23/04 4 R-1 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS ROOFING MEM NIIOIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIUIINII BRICK DETAIL HAR DIBOAR D PAINT COLORS SIGNAGE WINDOWS BRICK t k a rchitecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118 E. 26th Street S uite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www.tanek.com MATERIALS LIBERTY VILLAGE I hereby certify tha t this plan. specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct s upervis ion and that' am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnes om. name date license number: project # scale: name: CITY REVIEW 1/23/04 M-1 taek Liberty Village cZiG��ziir Q} EBFRTY VLLAGE Liberty Village Libcr�yY�a�c Liberty Village LIBERTY VILLAGE - - ea9ry tiberty Village Liberty Village L1bC12Ty VzlLaqe Liberty Village Liert Village Ltber ]Liiibeirt/ Vili VI Iagce Ca l rton Alison Castellar NIT New Century: Willow Times Capitals Bodoni Talon Ii.n.i on Oxford Ly dian..MT Papyrus ee/ Caflisch Viva Liberty Village LIBERTY VILLAGE L 1 E. ftT itLLACIF Ltheii Ville Ltherfy ViRati�r1 Ytt&? ibPrEy ViQQa4r IJert2 Villoge /414- tik, V 7ry Tyndale Parrish Ambient Dard Hunter Salon .l Hopper (in Vinci Victorian Cezanne E Hopper Michelangelo Dearest 118 E. 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:612-879-8152 www. tanek. com FONT SELECTION LIBERTY VILLAGE I hereby certify that this plan. specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the state of minnesota. name date license number. project # scale: name: CITY REVIEW 1/23/04 S-1 EA5T ELEVATION ■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUUIUIUIIIIIIIMUIII11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIpIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIII1 LL m LIE 11 WEST ELEVATION NORTHISOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIII t k architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118 E. 26th Street S uite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P:612-879-8225 F:61 2-879-81 52 www.tanek.com COLOR DIAGRAM LIBERTY VILLAGE I hereby cerdfy that this plan. specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the slate of minnes ota. name date license number: project # scale: name: CITY REVIEW 123/04 M-1 :ONNECTION TO / VALK WA u© S • \' ♦�j� ` 4 4 * 77 1-17 L.� s-, ORNAMENTAL METAL RAIL 0 51 2 55 S v WrALK WAY S TENANT 1 COFFEE SHOP 2 080 SF TENANT 2 HAIR SALON 1 220 SF TENANT3 SIM 1 7446 SF 1 TENANT 4 AVAILABLE 1 511 SF S TENANT 5 AVAILABLE 1 117 SF TENANT 8 MARTIAL ARTS 1 707 SF 709 3 0 CONNECTION TO WALK'W,AY MAIN SECOND F sOR ENTRY IRST FLOOR PLAN >.< RAILING DET AT OUTDOOR SEATING 5000 RAILPLS 5555 01'R 00xE5 T Ea;l+1WPER RAIL 4 BUILDING RECAP FIRST FLOOR 10 911 SF SECOND FLOOR 7 887 SF TOTAL BUIDLING 18 878 SF 2 STORY MAX HEIGHT 38 architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118E 26th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis MN 55404 P 612-879-8225 F 612-879-8162 www tank com CONCEPT FLOOR PLAN LIBERTY VILLAGE STILLWATER, MN I OnOralyttal Ma ¢tllm mn alml pond lamm an311. dad am atice MI am Mlama .atu:ne rbrn db dab d amain ammo ae. IRA.. mnwr project # scale name CITY REVIEW 1/23/03 ARC REVIEW 12118/03 REVIEW 11/27/03 ,r v"-% OPEN TO BELOW re \ \ \ 3TAYt TENANT SPACE AVAILABLE 4,283 SF TENANT SPACE AVAILABLE 3804SF © 5ECCND FLCOR RAN an:M6eetun) specialty millwork virtual vision project management 118 E. 281h Sbeet Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P112.879-8225 F 812-879-8152 WWW lane* c% CONCEPT SECOND FLOOR PLAN LIBERTY VILLAGE STRIWATER, MN I tmlyftegiOdErpq WeallaimpalviCopaldbms fa km dbCrdimmola none daft Ivor mmmr project scale name OMMEMIT- ARC REVIEW 12/18/03 REVIEW 11127/03 architecture speclahy raMwork virtual vision Project management 118 E 23th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P112-879-8225 F 812479 8152 www tanek com CONCEPT ROOF PLAN LIBERTY VILLAGE STILLWATER, MN INay agbttbpR a dSzeto virdpb agr datombloeO toll ® My bond NbCglrbIs nem as Year moebr project scale name REVIEW 11/27/03 5 UCCC -w NRE FINISH PL-.x Rr AP SIDPG WOOD BALLISrRADE i WOODS UAL WEST tL vATION A41 I16 0 EAST ELEvATION 0 r O' IGN LCC DN SHADED TTPI AL BLOCK BSE 6 AP SIDING DC BLE AND t040O16 OECDRATIVE BRACKETS WATERFALL 5106 11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIiIINIII11IIIUNIIIIIIIiIIIIIYIIIIIII11IIIIInI11111MIIIIWIIIIIIWIIIIINIIIIIIIgIIImilli■ ION Ole -__- NORTH El EVATIAN In I SECOND FLOOR TENANT SICK UNDER E vE LIC76 PG AVE CAL�� Fl ED LWDOW DOOR REL 55ED - IL L WEST ELEVATION RASH ENCL05l,R- VS I NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATION i DECORATI AWNG ■u ■u MOO OleOle n. EAST ELEVATION i DECORA vE AWVNS m1111pIIII�I111u111111I I101 I'Il llMIN�lmi ■F/■ENE vERTICAL 50740 II architecture specialty millwork virtual vision project management 116E 28th Street Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55404 P 612-879-8225 F 612-879-8152 www tanek com CONCEPT ELEVATIONS LIBERTY VILLAGE STILLWATER, MN nowbr0.fdfb F.L .Johanna oral unpp.! n IT. vuera/netonestmN Ihno Beganniontnnonnonoloo arn.nod.I.® rum m Ems.n umer project # scale name CITY REVIEW 1123/03 REVIEW 11/27/03 a-4 1 . 004 , dil* / A i \ • .Miliiii r . I I I 14 \ ``IIIIII - ---- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMII 1/ PMVY�4 0 MONUMENT SIGN s _ ARM architecture specialty mllhrork virtual vision project management 118 E 26th Sheet Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 66404 P 612-8798226 F 612-879-8152 www tanek corn SITE PLAN LIBERTY VILLAGE STILLWATER, MN aldbme nple•ppeulpry et rob enr dlIG MP*23101 l Y l die mYdrtYsola name &ft llama mmeer project scale name CITY REVIEW 1123103 ARC REVIEW 12N6103 \0 L L_ 11 02003 Yestweood P ofess and Ser*ces. i c I i 40*.litiiif 6 PO % rr PI 1 a '0�,��j/ ! 7 4 iffOrl I PAIII 4141* ylVWwipt, iii 1 It I I I I II I II I I 3 RSC 1 sT Planting Details PO 1 Ski 20 JRW 200\ ...,raft • ram or.. .a'�eoo+m w a` r ... eiMeese.,era--+alli iL;,..,l��c-ern.v_- �Na����������������������N!�������\ , �.Q\\X\\5704\.Zswyt1�����������1���������.rAv, �� .�� i���,r_1�����t1�'�������� 4.10 cola 1000 0 a 1 I I I I to 30 1. 3 RS 3 SA O N. red at.e men sd ®S'•e e•ebwal sr ram. beim }era ;MO •bw'm r 4 mom•" r� b10101.: r me mos manta boa e be a® Nap P. .erb 1ono• vcoed nave . m ere oven be aa.q s m vaem d red. S O rb.1 m m mar ere• r ®• 0.011..a o r001. pm oar n•rclap 0001.— Nora a• 0 rat wow eaaY a Plant List Call 48 Hours before d aging - GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-45A-0002 Mn Toll ree 1-800-252-1166 KEY Ott COLYON/BOTANICAL YAMS Sr 10 So9a Rao. / Am mschemm 01 21 ..pay Yon .*meet / pedalo LI®dh0 von Womb Unocal., ABM 10 Auedsb Blaze vile / AmS free... refers.' SA 9 Soma. Ash / Fraehu, penes.., 'Sune.It PGA 12 Fa09aid Ath/Frodno 19r. F.09old PO 16 *Mon Pb Oak / Ouerato a1May0b AP 12 1Alte Pins / At. dhows 9145 3 Bier 11W Spur / Pleas slew. danaolo RSC 1s Red saetda Dam / Yalta 7t. *awe JR 4 4am10. Two L9ac/51m9R resonate O 140 band pascal/Calmn satom lmttr AV 32 Autumn Joe Ybumunirolsomum dada.. 'Ralph Sn& Ole 175 0.af Kogan alos/S.6199 mspl .P000. LPS 99 L1tty Prin.. Spa. / Sofro. pow . fade Pnb0ws .6t0 110 Jaw Rod Welgdo/W.I9tle flo . parson. Jaw Ref N A 121 Holmanp Areennee/Btafo a.ofettt.s lldrttatap Planting Notes SIZE 4 se r BB 4 se r BB r BB ® Tr Bs 6 BB 2529 a 921 0om0 5 Cat 5 am. 5 Doi 5Dm 5Dd 5 Cat trnaa0 maws. ow bleR as pro n a0r4Uq bet to tuwr,e bobby bear lath Pre W abndthb e b se npstamly a Pm maaaan to wormy m utd.v... Mm. 00000 one. m ere aw peon.%. so waling rl to hamea me m coeb9 b0 mmbueel Ira boat edmpl0Yd aue.epd env 110 Wawa. amb.ds Ord as raep.sy* r and cedrq par to .bYan operation Mee Is CCapatq we.0.. ao roomer or itl.b mom an A. p01 OM the bob a ebb Me., h do feel ra. tb. ebb e of erode am1 m Cie p..9 tam pbeeed.p. As doer. bad be e/ ae.mt obey eta aoeawd b 11r Leenerae erbtt.et ere der err le hnral.e Plebe Arm .re noon ede-debean eb be nabs M9aae berm rot tenant tn..m Pe .end e.on t .loam roam e. ban ann. dd9.mrs brat awes. W. ob... a ge erPh Plot loom Yost ups Lams rod 11 brae al ledmatlwa AS plats cool be roam. grew. Row e2 be"ta9. y a..y van pvrur9 ..allow at no rat to woe. The trot.• abases era blob at no ne . any van, dnq menob b eame.bm rodeth lah n d.. d sowpt the vet Mono pm from 0e Uhe or rod abbwtmwe by Me Urbane. MCNs. m Ile Ober Aa doe ram Ise raw on In nand e11lb*Cby warn cabman at 91e be 01 011 bomb ben >b Inch dap dr..a beamed and Nob ebb on .rod bar lobo .a ro nab been d1 bee net am ebbed den grebe over area be beret web manes. W ebb many .m be ram .day non .aaprool 0.1 pr000 mv.aeNa r Are proms Trm. am be mama ern be 2/1 on rare.. do 5/1 bee toy. a1 m oa Wart to .Yee. lid norm.. mlaveba era be reaelWe ra mabbhaq Lea In mesa caring male" r pond of Lew .bob Mabee banaln saw al been the odd pre to 5011. 10ba0110 Aldrbd 0 allow m b.lYOs ern to M9mae1. N ea ma n con be a se scowl asap" aeon. red .cosh Cannes ear be .,same r the .a0.r9 el all Obey band won boa Leto 41100011. After are .Into} tree ama m Le n aaeemy to on Sad ea 9aWd a® Saw. been reel rem al sea sod 2 bee be .pent to m sac ere no en brew.01 Oem q bmrt*Aa 9 0*000 ma. to be era Ran n wean pro r .earn ben amen tips. per ay amen mad room. AO dub Lao 0m now pals send .n0 4 ass peeand bon sneer. Ronne erlab Moment ooneby Owned as mallaa The aamm0aa ebb. abbe bblwtlen wean pan -r Mtn In pony ebaea a4 11. contactor Is maw.. w.an few pbwlmb9 oewwte • retie al bme•l parry boh.a . nremMea eeae Bona en w arrows. btu bomb era e®abd von perton ens Rano. es men how. ram bar a. 3• dr. Aebd molls. a pot rased I mod to Rep pod W mtltlb► 0 50 100 150' Westwood Wasq.. t'rolm.a Services bee 7599 A.m. One Ea. Proal0. YN 553.4 Proms 952-937 5150 L- 1.07 may era Mee plan � aba .ptry m. er •era Son mR'.raas rn a0.rbb1 ow as bey ARp01ECT beer the be a e 5 . Me a Pomona Cory L Meyer gate: 12/18/02 UOab. No 26971 ana/at rr...> Dee an el Ole.= Or . Recap DA0.m0 by/d to awl Dab Preps ad Tor Liberty Village Contractor Property Developers Compaiy`lberty on the La The Ouacrant Building 7100 Norhlana Circle Suite 106 Mi-ne000l s Minnesota c5428 Stillwater Minnesota S-2 201111 20011114RF1A110 oat" 4/30/03 Sheet 1 OF 1 0< Areal Landscape Plan .2003 Westwood Professional Serinces Inc. I FEI -917 PONDIB Nw1 -900.0 HWL-904 8 IFES-925 FES-919 CBMH-920 • 1 • EX.CBMH-536. CBMN-909'A / t,\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\� STMH-926 a MANNING AVENUE NOPTH CBMH-75 50 POV/54 GAS CABLE ELECTRIC VARIES 3 0$ I STREET WIDTH 40 6-B TELEPHONE 5 8 12 12 8 VAF ES PARKING 3 0% CONC WALK-" SEE STE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION BIT SECTION AS FOLLOVS 1 1/2 BIT 41 WEAR COURSE TACK COAT 2 1/2 BIT 32 BASE COURSE 8 CI ASS 5 (1007 CRUSHED AGGREGATr)- 24 SECT GRANULAR BORROW 3 0% PARKING 20 3.0% 131t/2 2% CROSS SLOPE ON SIDEWALKS (TYP ) �CONC. WALK (SEE SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION NOTES. 1 SUBGRADE MUST BE WITHIN t 10 OF PROPOSED ELEVATION APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER 2. SEE STREET PLANS FOR CURB TYPE DESIGNATION SETTLER S WAY - NEW ENGLAND PLACE 5 -3Y32 CONCRETE TYPE A -GRANITE AGO 4 CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2 1/2 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE. TYPE 41 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (1005 CRUSHED QUARRY STONE) SELECTED GRADING MATERIAL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE BIT TRAIL LEGEND FUTURE EXISTING PROPOSED Sanitary Sewer (3-4-0 Sanitary Sewer (3--<-0 Sanitary Sewer G.-4—{) Water — I — Water — I — Water — 1 — Hyd w\Valve —I—w¢ Hyd w\Valve Hyd. w\Valve Storm Sewer 0--44—a Storm Sewer C—ce--a Storm Sewer D--ee----a / , ` \ \ / ^ \ / /// // //r� \ \\ // / / i' 1 1> // / Y / / l / / / / / \� POND T NWLm902 0 HWL=906 6 FES-924 F'S-929 E BIT TRAIL h 1 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\K\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\. \�\\I STMH-927 \ I `\ 11� r® Y /1 �J1 4 Coll 48 Hours before d ggng GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn Toll F ee 1-800-252-1166 STORM S:WER CASTING SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NUMBER TYPE DIA. CASTING TYPE 900 FES 30 RCP 901 c8MH 78 R-3067 901A CBMH 48 R-3067 902 CBMH 46' R-3057 902A 903 CB STMH 2x3 54 R-3067 R-1733 904 CBMH 48' R-3067 905 CB 2x3 R-3067 906 907 908 FES CBMI- CBMH 12 54 48' RCP R-3067 R-3067 909 CBMH 48_ R-3067 909A CBMH 48 R-3067 910 911 CBMH C9 46 2n7 R-3067 R-3067 912 917 CB FES 2 x3 18 R-3067 RCP 918 CBMH 48 R-3067 919 FES 24 RCP 920 CBMH 48 R-3067 921 CBMH 48 R-3067 922 CBMH 48 R-3067 923 CBMH 48 R-3067 924 FES 12' RCP 925 FES 15' RCP 926 STMH 66 R-1733 927 STMH 60 R-1733 928 FES 24 RCP 929 930 FES FES 36 24 RCP RCP 931 FES 24 RCP 931A CBMH 48 R-4342 A FES-931 v y-, J. C�MM-931A fl FES-928 0 50 100 150 E-12 20011114 000AF1 DVM 1e' Iftestwood Professional Serl,fce.. Inc. 75 9 Anagram Dnve Eden Praise MN 55344 Phone 932/937 5150 Fax: 952/37-5C22 Iweby certify Mon iw 010 was vmwed by me win Ck.01 wew•am w4 Mc gm duly bawd ERai1ERills \Iws 1 Me 8 Sg 51 u a1 nrmbs \\eabbDra \Bob Roper• E. bean Jr I t_ D to 07/0 /CaReg No 40410 Ammons t14e/02/al i om 1m bow 1.- Ds" b6/03/31 rbtennm Mtoonoe.e 7/01/41 Ambit Sum 1rr Prepared Tor Conti-ac:or 'OD Combo The 0Jad a^ 3 11011 7 0" Nc hlan Cir le SJI e 10E N n opal- InI'1'lmsa a paL2E Dote 05/02/03 Sheet 2 of 5 Liberty on the Lake Retcil Area Overall °Ian b /Ga Stillwater Ir,Inresotc �IU A A A! * I A A a 1 1 DADA- A A A D A A I.$ ! 1 A 1 A J A A a A A JJJJJ RAP A a A! I A J AAA A A D! l J D A A A A A A! A A A J • A A A I AAA A a a a 1 A 1 A A 1 A A ! A A l I D A A • A A 1•/♦ a D A 1 A•! 1 a a a a- A A A A J ! e A A 1 a A 1! a a A A A a a a A A A A A A AAA AAA So a! • A A A J AAA A 1 J 1 1 a A 1 a A A A A! A A 1 A a A & A A A A A J A A a s A! APAR a ! D a 1 a 1 1 A• A I a A I A AAA A-1 al % i ...10 .12,. A A a! A! a A A A• s A a a A A A A A A 1 A D A 1 A. A A A A! I A A J l A• A A jaj 1 A 1 A a 1 A 1 1 p l A a • A a 1 A A 1: ! tttttt J a A A 1 a l D D A• A A A a A A a A A A A A 1 A A l A A A• A ISPA D A A A A ! A a! a .J A A A A a A a A l• A 1 A a l a ,8 1 A A- A A a a! l a A A A A A A$ A A A J 1 a A) A !! A a 1 J a A A 1 1 A l A A• A a J A A a A A a 1 A 1 1 AA a A A a a A! A a a a D 1 1 a)) D D A I a a A a D a J 1 A. A J J I A A 1 a A A a A Ate! AAA l a l A 1 ! A A ail A A • a* A J A 41 A AAA I a a AAA A a AAA A A ! A' a • A A A l a 1 A a A AO A a a A A * A 11 A a a IAA ! a A J 1 • AAA 1 J All ADA AAA A ! A * A + A a l l • a A A ! A A A l A A ! a A AAA AAA 4 l 1 A A A A a D A A A PAO l • t PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO PUD-F/04-06 Planning Commission Date February 9, 2004 Project Location 640 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Robert Engstrom Type of Application Final Plat Project Description Final PUD approval of Building No 4, Terra Springs, 36 Unit Condominium Discussion Terra Springs PUD concept approved for overall site development was decided by the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 14, 2003 and City Council at their meeting of June 3, 2003 (see PUD conditions of approval attached) Previously Building No 1 and 2 had received final PUD approval As originally proposed, Building 4 was 32 apartments, 3 stories and 45 feet The proposal is for 36 condominium units, four stories and 50 feet tall As a part of Building No 4 development, the central green and related trails will be constructed The proposed building meets zoning height requirements, 4 stories and 50 feet and, as conditioned, parking requirements (2 spaces per residential unit) The project design details were reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission at their meeting of February 2, 2004, and approved with conditions (staff report and conditions of approval attached) Recommendation Approval as consistent with concept PUD approval Conditions of Approval 1 The central green and trials on Lot 4 shall be constructed before Building 4 unit occupancy 2 Four on -site parking spaces shall be set aside for required owner parking Attachments Application form and plans, HPC staff report of February 2, 2004 JAN-20-2004 09 03 MES SALES 6128527702 P 03 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED 0q-cr Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdlvislon Subdivision' Comprehensive Plan Amendment' Zoning Amendment' _XPlanning Unit Development Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application 'An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted In connection with any application All supporting material (1 e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material Is required If application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan Is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Protect 4, 40 ra I A" -41-t-tT Zoning District CAD _ Descnption of Project .Co Assessor's Parcel No 2-Bolo2„01q-ctta (-3,4 rr AF..0 GO,,Ls-rrzyc-z10�J (GEO Code) 7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit If It Is granted and used " Property Owner f-"t eACI0-1 C.01rev! tr- Representative J Va-" -'-- t'acOo te'vae Marling Address `ieo 1 4ee1:1. $14T , S' 10t Malting Address �loo City - State - Zip S'- - V4 b7 t HO 554-1.-7 Telephone No 952 8°1S too Signature (Signature Is quired) Lot Size (dimensions) 2so' x 2og' Land Area 3-71't`to'-"sr}o S40 t-r— Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Sat'-(o" (c . Accessory 1 IP City - State Zap 1,i•t i . c' tS , r11.1 s sAto I , Telephone No ce►t 's3et, '3't'i3 Signature ef (Signature Is required) 4,rriE -i SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Budding floor area7S, 036 square feet Existing o square feet Proposed -15105s" square feet Pay- - square feet . g sp =ces !oo RE E JAW 2I 2004 i COMMUNITY DEVELO""FN P-RT/ TOTAL P 03 4 WILKINS Location Map STREET VACATED ASPEN ST ADDITION r Vicinity Map Scale in Feet Sorts w Coclemoilir S217:0 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/04-09 Hentage Preservation Date February 2, 2004 mil'°- "a Project Location 640 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan Distnct Central Business Distnct Zoning Distnct CBD Applicant's Name Mathew Brinza — J Buxell Archiceture, representing Robert Engstrom Type of Application Design Review Project Descnption Design review of Phase II of Terra Spnngs Discussion The applicant is requesting design review for a 36 unit, 22,076 square foot condominium complex located within the Terra Springs Planned Unit Development This building is known as Building 4, will be named Territorial Place The proposed building is three stories tall and includes the adaptive reuse of a portion of the existing masonry wall currently on the site Other exterior cladding materials include brick that is similar in color and texture to the histoncal masonry used, as well as fiber cement board lap siding, corrugated metal siding and asphalt shingles The landscape and lighting plans for Territonal Place are a continuation of that which was proposed for the entire Terra Strings Development Brick pavers are being used in the walkways around the building, including the site's interpretive trail The fight design includes decorative antique fixtures adjacent to streets, double head shoe box luminaries at the surface parking lots, recessed stair lights at all individual unit entnes, decorative lantem fixtures at the main entrance, and bollard lighting at points along the interpretive trail Downitt security wall pack lights are also being used at both the drive into the underground parking garage and at the stairway on the west side of the building All mechanical units will be in the basement away from public view Also, the trash receptacles will be stored in the basement Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from directview utilityadrelease protecto final project inspectiform damage by onvehicles No 3 All landscaping shall be installed before project shall be phased rubn'ness be mstalis granted by the Planning led to separate parking areas from Commission 4 Continuous concrete curbing shall landscape areas 5 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on budding permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 6 The street address of the budding shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 7 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdycompatible with the color and materials ofrthe ash receptacles screened from view and project 8 A11 trees required to remain on site, asshal be taken to prevent damage during indicated on the plans, shall be d by fencing or other necessary measures construction activity 9 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public \ 10 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 11 Construction projects shall conform to the City's excess dust poise ordinance Construction dunng the dry season shall mitigate ms 12 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 43 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before budding permits are issued 14 Sign package to be approved by the Hentage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 15 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 16 All secunty lights on building shall be downlit 17 A sign permit is required for signage 18 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community Development Director Findings The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments: Application Form/Draft Construction Documents JAN-20-2004 09 03 MES SALES 6128527702 P 02 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: 111A Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of ail forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (1 e photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is reaulred PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of ProjecteAo A 1 %MELT Assessor's Parcel No Z eo g 0 2a2o\% 0 lbw, SrtLI4 S Zoning District i'''J n Descnption of Project in detail Ste. Ott Tr Asv1 e. cAld-1 "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, informabon and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit !fit is granted and used" If representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature is reaulred Property Owner tolbCirr EAc &t \ Cep *his Representative .1 '13-+111-1-- xuatrisctogz Mailing Address4(801 N.Sesr 8FIIsr so Ile b l Mailing Address 900 A 3 ' Columi City State Zip 'g ttcip,14 M/J ssisi City State Zip 1,4.1t,s , 11 Telephone No _ 1s2 sets too i Telephone No. (-IL" US 3'113 Signature ‘1547' Signature 144421— IA ieW S'n.,.L1A C \DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS \DWARD\DESKTOP\DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT WPD February 5 2003 r Memo To. Mayor and City Council From Steve Russell, Community Development Director (i. Date: May 28, 2003 Subject Concept PUD Approval for Multi Phased 227 Unit Mixed Use Terra Springs Development, Terra Springs LLC, applicant Case No PUD/03-27 The application before the Council is concept PUD approval for the 227 unit Terra Springs Project The site is located in the Central Business District, CBD, and is a Planned Unit Development allowing flexibility of design The 227 units are contained in five (5) buildings Three of the buildings, 1, 2 and 4, will be a part of Phase I development starting in August Buildings 3 and 5 will follow All the buildings will require HPC design review and final PUD Council review The HPC reviewed the plans at their meeting of April 7 and the Planning Commission reviewed the plans and recommended concept approval on April 14, 2003 A site plan and building elevations are attached The height of the prposed buildings are No 1 - 19 HU's - 45 feet, No 2 - 44 HU's - 4 stories, fed feet, No 3 - 90 HU's proposed 8 stories 95 feet, conditional 6 stories, 60 feet, No 4 - 32 HU's - 3 stories, 45 feet and No 5 - proposed 42 HU's, 5 stories conditional 4 stories and 50 feet An interpretative center and trail is proposed along with a substantial public green area that retains the foundation of the old terntonal prison manufacturing building The existing wayside shall be relocated along the interpretative trail Comments from MnDOT were received Staff and the developer are addressing their concerns regarding site access An EAW was prepared for the project and considered seperately Planning Commission Recommendation: Approved as consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Plan Attachments Application, plans, staff report and minutes from CPC 4/14/03 C Ok c) .-�.NNING APPLICATION REVIEW F M CASE NO PUD/03-27 Planning Commission Dates April 14, 2003 Project Location 608 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Downtown Commercial Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Terra Springs LLC Type of Application Concept Planned Unit Development Project Description Concept Planned Unit Development review of Terra Springs project on 7 93 acre site including 227 housing units in five buildings, 4,000 square feet of office use, 9,000 square feet of retail and 2 64 acres public courtyard, open space, landscaping and interpretive trail Discussion As previously presented, the City of Stillwater has selected a developer and is working with that developer on plans for the infill/redevelopment of the old territorial prison site at 608 North Main Street The redevelopment site is the land inside wall that defines the perimeter of the site Lands above the wall will be retained by the city as part of its open space system As shown in the attached development plans the proposal is for five buildings, buildings 1-5 as described below Building Date Building 1 Two stories of residential over one level of half paring/half commercial 19 two story townhouses @1,500 sq ft average Approximately 38 underground parking stalls (2/home) 7,000 sq ft commercial/historical interpretive Proposed approximate building height (floor one to roofline) 45 feet Building 2 Four stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking 44 condominiums @1,320 gross sq ft average mix of one and two story homes approx 62 underground parking stalls (1 4/home) proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 60 feet Building 3 eight stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking 90 condominiums @ 1,250 gross sq ft average approx, Approx 153 underground parking stalls (1 7/home) Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 95 feet Building 4 Three stores of residential over one partially underground level of parking 32 rental apartments @ 1,350 gross sq ft average Approximately 58 underground parking stalls (1 8/home) Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 45 feet Building 5 Four stories of residential over one level of parking and retail 42 renta ..Nartments or for -sale condominiums mow_ _00 sq ft average Approximately 67 underground parking stalls (1 6/home) 6,000 sq ft commercial Totals 227 homes 13,000 sq ft commercial 376 enclosed dedicated parking stalls 145 on -site guest parking spaces Two hundred and twenty seven housing units are proposed in the five buildings In addition, commercial space of 13,000 square feet, 4,000 office and 9,000 retail is proposed Parking requirements for the residential use is two spaces per unit or 454 spaces Commercial space requirements is 58 spaces Totaling 512 spaces The plans show a total of 487 spaces, 342 covered and 145 surface Public access to the green and trial system will also require parking as well as pedestrian access The proposed height of the buildings is not clear The application indicates a maximum height of six stories and 65 feet The height limit for the CBD district is 50 feet The PUD would be developed in phases starting with 2003 and completing in 2005 The development plans include drainage and circulation have been reviewed by the city engineer, traffic consultant and fire chief The circulation plan will be modified to address fire concerns for building access The concept design plans were reviewed by the HPC at their meeting of April 7, 2003 They approved the building concepts proposed The detailed building design will require design approval before a design permit is issued Likewise, final PUD approval will require special building use description, composition of residential units and assigned parking The parking ordinance allows for modifications to the parking standards based on a specific site and use analysis The height of the proposed building(s) may require a height variance This will be reviewed when specific building design plans are proposed for building permits As a part of the proposal, an interpretive trail/facility plan is proposed The specifics of this plan/facility should be coordinated with the parks board/heritage preservation commission and Washington County Historical Commission Environmental Review A environmental review assessment worksheet , EAW, is required because the site is on the National Register of Historical Places The EAW is attached and will be notified for review and comment Recommendation Approval to Council Attachments. Application and plans CPC Action on 4/14/03: +5-1 approval yltim ,= situ 227ho eson793acres a 29homes/ e ol expo impact upon the city echo district Minimal Impact In 227 omes here, may see about 5 school -age children total stratifi . tion of residential use number of omes single f mily detached 0 single-f- rnily attached 0 multipl= family 227 staain • olart Budding 1 constructio u start autumn 2003 occupancy Autumn 2004 Buliding 2 constructio start autumn 2003 occupancy ate 2004/early 2005 Building 3 constructio start late 2003 occupancy pring/summer 200S Building 4 constructio start autumn 2003 Bulldin9 5 occupancy ' ummer 2004 constructlo start autumn 2004 occupancy autumn 2005 gross _• uare_footage of commercial f oor space 13,000 f resld „ aldwelltoa unit by number lof bedrooms 227 unl approx unit mix 80% 2 bedroom + 104 3 bedroom + 10% 1-bedroom or studio equals approx 458 bedrooms If l l It Ii £ d 0610 ON n.t.'r unxV 'myna r7t snn7 b Lflhu EAST STILLWATER Location Map T1LA I•a RAW R]1W Yamty Map Scale In Feet ,r..-...,.... esill.. .+wss.mawor.ww ww.w.wr.po..q.m.a .rwr a.y..wY¢orgY.. ...... b.. wmwYa w.O�arr.ft� J.BUXELL CC «< < .,n[c{E -IUI EFE E INERMISI ERR OWNER ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES 4801 WEST 81 ST ST. SUITE 101 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437 CONTACT: BOB ENGSTROM PHONE: 952-893-1001 IEEE EF Cr E EEE 1 1_'n , 1 IIIIIIIIIIII,IIIII,I�� 100 0 999 TERRITORIAL PLACE STILLWATER, MN ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE J. BUXELL ARCHITECTURE 900 N. 3RD STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 CONTACT: JACK BUXELL PHONE: 612-338-3773 GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHAW LUNDQUIST ASSOCIATES 2757 WEST SERVICE ROAD ST. PAUL, MN 55121 CONTACT: TOM MEYERS CRAIG SANDEEN PHONE: 651-454-0670 CIVIL BKBM 5930 BROOKYLAND BLVD. NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429 CONTACT: TOM CESARE PHONE: 763-843-0464 STRUCTURAL HANUSCHAK CONSULTANTS 26 EDMONTON STREET WINNIPEG, MB CANADA, R3C 1 P7 CONTACT: BILL HANUSCHAK PHONE: 204-956-2200 C�MM�A ���4� \)\)-`( 1 ENS ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NORTH THIRD ORB. NMNRAPOUR N AX1612 A 55401THHLL1612B311•TT]5 RAY1612030 0040 4,44,004411.00.4 URBAN PLANNING OPIPISPACECOURIUNIMIS ARCRRRGR000IRR LANDRCAPR ARCNRELTURS GRAMIR9 MUM.. 0111/EfOLT.S. Me/AM HT MUM Mall NV =NCI SUIERVISION :Ammer woman. usear MARK RYAN ItOKATlik MIS 17428 STILLWATER, MN DEVELOPER: ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE: PROJECT NR: DESIGNED: DRAWN T230a 01020 40 JHB,MJB NJ0 A0.00 1 J BUXELL I IF +r SHEET INDEX AO 00 COVER SHEET AO 01 SHEET INDEX & BUILDING DATA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LANDSCAPE PLANS LO 00 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH L1 00 SITE PHASING PLAN Li 10 SITE PLAN L2 10 DIMENSION PLAN L3 10 IRRIGATION PLAN L4 10 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN L4 11 BUILDING LANDSCAPE PLAN L5 10 AMENITY PLAN L5 11 PAVING PLAN L6 10 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L6 11 SITE DETAILS L6 12 SITE DETAILS BUILDING PLANS Al 00 Al 11 Al 12 Al 13 Al 14 Al 15 GARAGE PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN FOURTH FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN BUILDING SECTIONS A3 10 TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL SECTION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A5 10 EAST & SOUTH ELEVATIONS A5 11 WEST & NORTH ELEVATIONS TERRITORIAL PLACE EXTERIOR MATERIALS material square feet of building exterior fiber cement board siding brick corrugated metal siding stone glass 15,997 5,844 5 106 1,326 5,377 33,650 48% 17% 15% 4% 16% BUILDING FOUR AREA CALCULATIONS residential gross square feet enclosed parking gross square feet residential net salable square feet 52,960 square feet 22,075 square feet 46,297 square feet BUILDING FOUR RESIDENTIAL MIX 1-bedroom studio homes 1-bedroom plus den homes 2-bedroom homes 2-bedroom plus den homes 3-bedroom homes total number of units total number of bedrooms 1-bedroom studio homes 1-bedroom plus den homes 2-bedroom homes 2-bedroom plus den homes 3-bedroom homes average home size 7 7 12 5 36 average s f 723 square feet 1,206 square feet 1,331 square feet 1,505 square feet 1,710 square feet 1,265 square feet BUILDING FOUR PARKING DATA enclosed underground parking spaces 52 standard 8 tandem 68 total parking ratio 1 9 per dwelling unit ARCHITECTURE, LTD Soo WOMB THIRD MEET aVNPaPo1JS. AMINVEttt1 SRO MLA 2034 r/13 AMA 1]]11 ado UFL M.ANNINO OFINSPACE COMM NM. CFITTECTUA LA MCA Pa RCJIRTITUo FLAP n Rumor 1.0200:110.. NARK RYAN w.. 17428 d 0 DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 SHEET INDEX GENERAL NOTES FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. PROJECT NR DESIGNED DRAWN 12304 01026 40 JIB nee Hle A Q91_ IMP SUNVtY YNtYANtU TUN W spark Corporat on c/o Mr Greg M Iler Reg canal D rector 333 South 7th Street S te140 M neapohs M nnesota 55402 FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION Zon C (areas f min mal flood ng) Federal Emerge cy Management Age cy Flood I sura ce Ra e Map Revised 2/1/1984 C ty of St Ilwater Wash ngton Cou ty M nnesota Comm nrty Panel Number 275249 005 C a O m z O 0 0 .. West Elm St Do r) ab H Y 0 m 17- o U a) (/) w 8 o0 r— — L..-Lot F� I I Block Six a 9 1 CARLI & ESCHUk6I�IBURG S 5 ,�- "taro / N 3 1 6 5 8g - S88154 21 W 149 95 0 e0 O1 w+ 3 e T. \ Block Seven 2 51 _ TCOS ORNO'S 1 1 tin N M v.sss� 3 �d.55A R tV2 6 _ 8 - I OZ — -_ — _ East i -_'" L ;`\par w. - s k vi _ 5881V 21 W / 149 93 1 -1 L �� 588144 1 f 267 20 - - art m Moos S - urF I UPUVKAF'HIL SUKVLY Lot 1, Block One Territorial Prison Addition Part Of Former Minnesota Territorial Prison Grounds Stillwater, Minnesota SURVEY NOTE The graphic information shown outside the confines of the intenor pnson walls of the former Territorial Pnson and easterly of the westerly nght-of way of North Main Street are not part of this Topographic Survey The aforementioned graphic information is part of a previous survey which was used as a base map for the Topographic Survey ADDITION / — `N 4/ - /// a ori ry 720 5 I ^n N6 'W- _wa - eLa s.en lost La a.. \, _ sum Um rattan SVen LL f F�� v / — 3p n�o —— �Hs> 79 11JJtre�Sx. _ - 1 L �� • 49 %t7 �y - 23 / \� w -11°e Maw ^O l 1 3 1-714 _now /r'�37r r !g SAND BRUSH=�-T7 _._- 161 / TREE ' / ,a , Government 4.13 /)lei I - r / 7105 -/ Lot One O I z _ 33 7123.--3750 COon I 33 6 CO^ 3 U1 w , '�`° LOT 1 0 W \, 5 42 Acrest /3 w�- `w\ / iD7�3 W o 7'4 / g W brow Shop. W r4'""'lt>ks v714 12 / w\OLOCK i— ` 709J \ - — �>2a79 _ / .7067 SCALE 11 r1-off t 23 ( 6 706 B - 707 9 / yD :292 \\ 706.7 hty J 1\ s 4 4.w� �1- 7D2 66 , 03 - 1 I ANO BRUSH P ea. B1}Sun by `e 7oz 1 oars f Il _ �� F n ° �� s y-- I 714 8 p Sr 8'* 'Xi F an / 3 n'/ o �a 6 \� \ I1 / Qa /re 8,46.9 t76-` W —iiif's W 8760 46 w w ) i w` �Jv k' . w�1�7 I, W; �amrtD / J / % �6 I / o� ('' - w n z 1 st�ye \ J nab s W \ Z, a@gs703 6 rt"o�wkif W,� w/! —/� I 9x� / ry�z15) 8Q Section 28 W w�-W® ��° o `O"i,m I / o0 696 48 W 44 70, 7� ti �l w; o, a i� `>>\ ri1M / 10+ aAe 0 hsr, 'pp�� ) \ \ w� \ \ tow -m695 3 / / 1I1gg uww N ( l j • l �� a W �� Ti m A ,y l? �, \ J �- p l ' TREES ANO aRUS -\` _ H \ � had" \ i, (� 718-m,,v062Tli ) °'o'-"i {_ _ _ E6vemh Tract _ s7215 - ljpol \) Twelfth rau \ \ --DYw3nPAR 6 229 96 -—,-_$�-I la 643 Wge 17 l40 g 4 Nvr- sad 26 54 / r \ I �) 1 _ _ rz f1308E ) S7j2879 1 ��mot i59 51 E \ 56 61 83 99 � / \ TE ! S7 145 21 E 1 580,57 40 E N Kammer. Set A \ - is a These Lao Due T V mm S Cep L m scone O Ma 12 (NOw C\(yl OF ?AOC.' \ And Crumbled Stone T3ON ,FOwN 892 7 1 m 3 I 3 s69\ Cm) `i`1 CON) Po k8 � � ZO dock 5" I _Roam -1 1 usFy 1�r►�\�u�Dz.°-=—"7D � OQ\G\NPR 4 92.1 Qss > I • I I 1 / t 69 Be I I // yip \�77tI �� 696 Surrace oa\ e, � I � / s ciao p - I �003 �� - i I Iu I 70 3 \ hds 7 p ~ { II ti_ I 10 I - ���l 6s 956 1 \ 8G9926 / 1 ,�d l''i C /I $''A / -\\ -/ / ¢E 3 f/ 11 (� ') l�A , 7, -/ rlL3 �- / _ gyp, Y I 3 A 37 \ �I �c� t 0 / �G��pO�i % -_---------,/- -' ~ i3' / NI � v/ ::9# '_pa � / %a69e e N ( / i IL ) - _- 3 wG� vF^�� / 3 / o_ i s " WI 1� ) 1 I i) l / rL� d ,/Be n (I 'e . I 1 , ) I (9i' ) �L--'10 \ ai 1 t :ti — "°/ 1� 98.e-./ / r i t/I I / v/ IW w &&IH-�?2/5 J I I NE�� ,�� � W 933 $ 08ts, 31EO// 7B3 5 \\ > 33 zz _lQQ / d R a�".f/ W,` �'r\wnv'��;---'>a.n�//lifiv �d 11 J I m W N, ( / ca.d Swat,/R S Ca s - -LI 3 ij.,------- /W f 3 l4)1 f I O Li,, �7--,,,,W - W- J -.'7/ / ) / i / / o687 /4 ) Z- ^ / \ I I iI II I 1� 3 3 401 I I �`) 3 1 3 I� I I I (Rol y 3 I 3 48 w O Grev 1 ti 1� VdN Ss�l cc, 1 • once w w Area / ODe Maw gat \ salt, 37 - — = 26 . w i _\ / TREES Ag° a -\I ss I I hit _ /� 10 icP . 5 it - Ss ' ss 3 1 52 1(RURER®CB 692 08 I R2OW- \ \ s 7915 \9 \5 2 E 256 75 tom" dd.' 96 h Pp' 692 8 ti...wow - w� y - i - - -. --°"^ oast I 80 76 S 80,34 32 E I'I 11) n Peer II 3 1 !I Folz, Freeman, Dupay & Associates, Inc lA LAND SURVEYING LAND PLANNING y-' 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 ro (612) 439 8833 Nth Technical Asslaten.a rrvn Eta eat M Stack. RLS 1377 Stack La d SurveroB SURVEYOR S REPORT A. A d par Mort was node to Prate end hew d N mprovemema to th property Taro are areas at heavy brat% wroth rd tat Don on U. M I pm8b4 that pear on/movements or remnants f past improvements Wit that were not found this survey B V bk indict re of ware m ns. nth LW hydrants were m looted thb urw.y TM Wat Deperbnen f th Oty f S Water has f mod m that Owe subnandard Mt. ma Fla on the hat awn rot is acceptaNa fin use by fly future dmeloprnent t the property They also indicated hat the available crops and records of do firths water ro were were.-ew water senora red be prawded I have alternated to rh w th y where tM w liable maps d reor0 bdlcate there is mtrp mum I C Surface I demos of °the sifted re Mown hereon The uhder9rwd bcsd of flee and ss u dc.n ere demownate wy The apron m IDamon based on avSahle m p8 nd records supplied by th Public World Department of th C ty of Stllwater (storm lid as rery sewer) nd ut lay flap Roca res (gas el nc rd oN teems ) suppled by Gash State One Can ley Craton F more speak formate rep rang the u0Moa 00d or ndersoird heaves Contact the leave/Liar authorities !theme WOtlea directly D There speed to be on es on too red eb ed)anap prnpertsa Sane or hese 0Rmps no hove ground In riddles Accord 9 t the records of th Pub1C WNW Dept of th Sty r S lost th rate limed the p bi stern one system off ere The btotnns of these sir, as re not deortted on the map Th wale shown lwe0 are of mamas acres The Weer base of the me interior) arson wan wa bored cast where s908900 y labeled atherwoe Th thclmra f these wain va as led unknown There may be nrlors from thaw wa ls No smart totem m made rearing ownership f the wills the property 'me Na pe06 rtrtemen made rep ring emoa0ments f the wee from co onto this moody There tad nes t One caws Yong th south Im man have been how The ownership of these haves d to me There dons not apes t be any that arsaas to these vas nth to from the Iaoparty N Weans on nos supplied m reyrdP9 nose NOTE NOTES DENOTES 1 /2 INCH IRON PIPE NONLINEAR SET AND MARRED WTIH A PLASTIC CAP 9IOCRSED "FREEMAN RLS 16989 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE DENOTES 1 /2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND AND MAIMED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED AS NI GATED W DENOTES APPRO8INATE LOCATION WATERMAIN —5 DENOTES APPNOSNATE LOCATION SANITARY SEWER SS DENOTES APPROIN4ATE LOCATION STORM SEWER DENOTES ELECTRIC, GAS CABLE TELEVISION ELEC G CAN —flow DENOTES CHMMELOED WATER FLOW ORIENTATION OF TH S BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF TERRITORIAL PRISON ADOm° HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DRAWING 15 A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THIS SURVEY AND ALL MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN PLACED N THE GROUND AS SHOWN. THIS SURVEY OR PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SLA0EYDR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRACE A FOL2 TMOTHYJ FREEMAN DAVID L OUPAY MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO 9232 DATE MINNESOTA REGISTRATION N0 16989 MINNESOTA REGISTRATION N0 17252 OFFICIAL COPES OF THIS MAP ARE CRIMP SEALED 1999 F I Freem 0 pay & Assoc Inc - All Rlghta Reserved • • r - WV¢4 L y✓ s .54 x ,a iS- id'•. t Y S� r r kxy^a �^ ✓{3 �' u r rt �f t J' { dst�g4 7 ir,� y i ' < n s , 7 a,. -� _ 1r-L-'✓fi jy� .ti M r -4- r' �$ c 1 „� t �t _ ,. �� ,r ; ` r 'f i J �. f� >� x'tt3r rr r✓�f r' t t •-A -4- r.� X„ 1 'F' r;� r "�i'"�a `µ"�,, u. x � si,a tr jjT�. i1 1 ti : u r 1 1, vc`'; t .rN it ✓ 4. 1„1 , ., M P . r b ,...,:pe rtr r-'✓ q� .,11 � 'IX� l - i l'$ 4. r i 'Tu I' rt � ru - " 1 &+v r y N V. _ A xy �- ^ . 7 - I t - n tr ,S-u�s i 9 ,s .-t k u sty^' ^J ,� sY ry a .k,. .7,� o n+ �, e ;'"' 4 ,r `" f4 a }2,i- \ .�,� i"i. °w� d err 44 '1 i;:' �r7 6- t i, '" '' R! ,y r -t x '� ,w t,. .,. `lti a s 1 t•^'r SF,.,,�cty,t -,. P •, a a) n 3 't k r a .t �' 7 r� tf t4 4� '4''' ���t ! q rt : a a ar 1 ^✓ ff *�" 1 :Tie .7011 r a�N Ft'ter✓ .k -�.H�,. r,H" t�`��~ Fr7 u^R '4- A�y1Y Y1 %+. 14 1 Y A rye, "5.,� J' ^+1 ✓ •f Y �.: d G, F �` ;f l/.�Jt� i.' " ,j. � �' 7;4rQ S 1rV• !'rAr , -`aY ��f i 1 }'�3,, %.aii<! �"= 'S ]" 1{,*yV!r yl "LPG J, (�''r'W 2h i it , r '� 'S r t I 1�L 4NDi l v ta^ k cu & dR; w'E��''7$rrvr.�t�Til f � � s N Y }�'�..sf `T �y'�t-' S 1..() ?�' � gi rr -.3' �piscS k�I{1Z•�, �, � s t tY' e,M R 9 t t Y.t ^ , "� a•r i r yr r.v, s� 1?LF � n K r :w� afrtrt -.�-, "'�,� s '� �,3..\ i9�4� f .�5+� � �'�'�:1111111;:41::, �,� � tee. F � ,r �yr r, ,yT.� �,- �� t' -�4� re� J,�t t„.�.,,..c-•,�t✓i r'y4i kSrr a � f .a���c t + 23 �,. 'A�.an (v .y-. N ?` raj ti i ,.} .r... 'J -'A�' �•- a 1 1`-1,yvF ar 3 7 fi s .r ? i '"���'r =,K-P 3 €.-•� 'Pa 7`t`r °r ^'���� �.�r J ✓ i� "tr7 -afi�z! •a�� i •�„y.c�z� jd _� � t-"��r lo-s�^iw C•f 1r ` , ,�,y`f �} $ F.• � m h� 4r� '�m '� r k% yz ,�<. �' 5J� �.h.�s -•�•%P + C �ue-t.+I `Z'' rSk.. ti .tcy. 7� �+�- t t y r� _�4 rot.._'�E A !., '' w- t ,�I Y�t �i' S t "'1F i.'�' }S _* a ` .r •i. • «.-.Yr Y s 1 t!' t '�• `✓.> �. �•�`� ,4 v._r 1�,r+u� .^l, ,T •�w ,i, ry.- ,� r fw t 4 �� � rf T` � .t � f(K } " r _ {d ' , Y -y."'��n �` ��� '71 k�"A' f Xt {��4 r' � ,u 3h � 4` ..d' T fi •..y. Par" �'" k ',�S- Fr � ti-^G� r,vI--• `i � p `1( 4•t''�bAA �t e�, 411i A. i' ~ ' -, sa L -, t a 4 t e{ a7 r .S.Mo✓ �}, 4 k F 'Y e! airrtiGi+,�S�� r lk`lt,, G' "rtr .s•r, n fr(3 ', i rf, r brr F•r-•2.. �k .� k x ,} c rt �.o C.� tit }.ti�r.� N yrn F v.�s x xt},R, 2 'r.F^7.rr '� \ ` '- .� ' attr h14 ti S•<- 4 '444 'h } �'3 •1` 1 i 1. 5 t .�'" { r ,y. �Ja)''',(1 r �.• �a { ^ r 7,13 ., b r'.'1'r` nc hd t "'t+, r t s a ' 0.- Mar; '-'L ' M n'` ; r v >'w�s Fc` t,q*-c.'r3 q.e t q t 14 ,r-$' % Y '� r, t x *? 7 1^"•e� y sy r '! yr .. tW. r w i-Y V it '� f air J l i Ar__ ti R T J� I'l ..T' i rSi r`•.s"�f-. u/ •ii . )i ., �'� r '� )r 1 r ✓{ !r h� e•-".t..P�' `rrr S 1f" tR' \ t \ z �- r „t >,-F .• 'yY• a •g t r� r' ��dd 1.,-,,,,- -,r P ��' 1 r ✓,. 3r"' k2,f Cr ^ a �� F' ss; t7 1 „ v., { p r ^ tT L ; r 4 U 4 i" n,%`! ( i "y �> '� n fa 7r 7F f 1i.•a'u.a r ',t,P J 7r L� �I t' v( T T' E a 7 'S� a ,"t �. 5 01 f ,�,� s rrt 'L 'i�t .c i .ri e ,4t &1 if �t h �i f 7 j tS °-'-«i�441 �' 7 i f r ^sy4� ti s c# c va ,,!,"4:".: -.- .. trfr t A v rf< a tt r ,3 !�ma�y, 'rL r ,,, �' ' "et ).an' �'-;r„ 3 t r Y P -�c. "° a , t,,,._-- r *u5' r ' { 4a " Kid "( F !z 1 4 3..... �in t✓ ^7 .. 7'tr f "�S +;.fir i ' d T e x f1 t y i c.. 'et r p 1 40' r " ,Z ' S ark' r ° r. s F t,..D y• r S C ,may C'v r F'JL Li 1', Y 1 C, ' hl '¢ !�'" a `c � � y�{`' �• , .'i` r " y'f 4-. '' j,- y -i 4j S e/ <:: i., 9 ic y '�" y\ ,q .,. r7r 'Y s r a,_ a W �a ''"'TIT.; [ i i' C 4 i, � mo. ' e a.. '� ft a 1 Y qE. t , e r� r _ �. •.t Z 1Tt f y-�'' ,t;,,, r`-' t Y} -tt,d-, ,./'ter '� 4 •,Ar�" Tt t '/ ; J F ? M} F r �3 r I �' i' �i y, 1.. t fi 1r `l "�4i `n' y 4 c P } h� i Et~cly" z c i } Y x 7 ro4'j• �t r5 a Sb r 1.-�i ! Y 'f r d� o J•ir�b ,� ray a r vL(`4"t k �r'f L .r T � ti r,-..t a 3 g, '} r ti r t 441 F, t` r r h.r .�f Y , ,. t es C r t r 44 7 . r > at n t41 i .-'t" t 4,i ,_ ) f !, - ,. Y L 1k. 44 `�..,Ry L., 'L.'t , 1*; i V'7 r `) `., N4' t 1,' , 1 a v s / r� '•'3x� '" e ' ` ..rz5 tl .••i xM1 '� `rr tL Y�9'?r� I, ¢ 4 su7p� r ^' ems l$t' ° j t+}iTr �� i -41'1 G'i4 - I t 7 .. au ) 4 } '�� w va x i t 11 o' �� a •,� rr£ r is '. J -i aP }t r t t t1 i v N- v" rj,1./z7 r� f t y i' t.s 1 K �„ s..? y y M4 .r i H )yam r ,), .x > i1 �, 1 !a .1 r ry 'rr : 4 r S 3 F LL t 4 ',;4-.)1, F y i 4 t .' c " us i 1 7 t k;Y� f• is{; '. tC -�::h %`.. , IA-1' 1.� 4 A!t 1✓ 1 * •'�' �r r�` w 3 t rf d;yt� tea. rti + ` r 'a ,r �r ai t '4�r a..:i�•' � � r � : �,�', r a j tp�+. 4 k �°'4 ,ti'rr y� w� �,st�F S ! t �, F 4 t 1, �,„. ,K l} t S 4i .f i va s . s r„,i 1> �'. 2 tp Yy r g tip V ' -1 _Y , A _4 3s r4 1t r4 tz a + b s T} 4 K1Ti l } L V �1e d Q� ttif r. i .�, �. r�L 7�y'Kr�. + �,�,5.• a� �r^h'i i,�4 J(Y+ r I 7Y ✓ r ; ry y. �y�K�C. `` I r 4 iS 1-r„ � 1 sic �. tiTf x'Y o- q ♦ '._ 1. r s s J� G .J:,.t a• z v s r' 1 S'° y ti fGr 1,44 0.! w ;i- ri d' , (� .`�` � T: , Ja s '45 -4L a » ! 1 r ?ecS �Yx_JrxjBh jr 7rrfj/ ,`� 3 �.� �9► { tit �1 r 4 t�,..•e'f� } F �l r t fad r # t 4 1tlr' i + "" ."•�." - ' F.„„r5. ,A1 t kr -Tfh r (51 r / 7•„ r ...,;`•,�.;i .'••+., r £, + is t! � ;$'p ' $ �y hw tw fi � °rt . `f Jr .^tya. t , a ...> re s -4'a ,r, , z s2 rp r > +t ly � , t .1 rs -..- > � sf V t 1. Iii.% -4-, ,1 r 1' o-," fir, r ^-li yykx J! 'y` `-. 7" ,," S t 1 `� K ., r t •4 if#t - aX��t r 3'r'sr r J ! ',r'-!' t �,r . t . ,,,,?t i n ° A, ,, "^,* I1 'G `S Ya rY x rt'"-C .Ns ''1:;.; ^J ,. 1 r ri) rx � 'r 4' ' 34" �r .. �+ 5- n i ,i} - r 1 r t a• tc FL y 'r + `^ Yr - w r^ , i „ a i u- 1 3F r 2 'Sa v 1 5 fit' 3' fa,r x '1- r 4 ,, y,• ,at r 1 - < M� 4x ri ff *� §! �;-" r a 5 3 r► ! at - k 1� 3 ±r .• r > f ; t 5 ! �� x a �a�l s s#i�t ::: r�i3Yi"t r D 4Af`7'� �4+1tcr, �� t R�'"� ''".,�t,rhr>"}�"h-arPf` " Z J :IC: . 5' r -4 -}? tir' * {r} aV MmL T ''' i4' y ��-' S 1 ? t,��*4 k T j,i- ^ # C%{t h�N 4Y rv41 ri�crh L 1tiif, r r' 1.'r i tom" , �.is` •�f. f. t t.. i`Ly r'1 £.•� „q � i . 1tS�5- Je ti tr ; �J 1 4 6 t' 1 t + y54 h _ 7 e t,., yl n- 1 iwy�,.a;' Y' ix.3' " ^ �w T� ,thy �r�t e ,`„ a t sEr".t,✓' '1-'. i r *'a lr }ti p c ''� it -:::::-..-ill,,,,,,,,, r ;P 5 ✓' I r t 5.s- J r[ f, Y� ,. 4. 1, ...TAYly- F •• r- > ,r et* F� (r' f 4h Fkrs , .' y fi e i rye r # r .,/,...,'���f..y , 7,~ ! nr ^y 147, ' sr r+�'"e S3 m ret"1�j `�y. #i Ja '°FY v ✓' r� t `9 �.nt s c.. r>�' .bi, a +ft,`Jti rSt '"J i. tV,,,, '1. _ _a '- iri:4 t qb sY� �ixYsw }dyti - 1 �rjr� > L3f�y��r �.r` ,.A.� o iJ r,f 1a•N r r v rC wa <„. ,a-...,M t r^t' F rt^r f'J".c eS �l r,7�,, SSr73t- 3Y 5a/f1 ^-i?i -,r .tar a at1�` n �hr� �E^r � Y' w ti "T•4 { p F i ,.J -r -IL ..., -r z4 or [ -t ,EL `I''''' ar'V <'.AS�„ 3' ^rr s. y �y ciPryN � t{ rE-r1r v rt,l f S7 �m '3�.4.-y4`r � .�.YLj"19 r ✓;. ) ,; 4 .- .. r '., J r. i a ra Y i i w S'' _fi .e' w, Aid r1 4r 1�'' r�yt �' �rti'� r ? itt -,}_•- " n ..,, s� rrs. ,�y, „'! r M 1 r' i r b t A. t! -: �4 t Z.-.< w 1 y cw t !' 1,, I., i .L rk,r l t y+ 1• `v 7G i. f y ) yam Y 4 Z`� S t` tY' R �r S. ' - t v'4r' f +M1'1 •,. 'P' t ) '43t7 n o r r n ,t. '! ..' t s r i-� k a } t t IK - _ ,.y ' r' ro s 4 { a �• t f� l a ,, `,- s fit' z ts� q tsar ��: 14.ai r .' a e.) 1i"'- �Y ` = r)� t `F r-t`>r 4 .- ,..- ti .,r e a R. x _r ) �,• E- x A* 1 �r 4� c}, '6 c r sty _�,.:t t ' 7' y ,� j ri` `6 . i2 � <`.-`1 r ' i'T, 1 rC �� t �' r r Yp f a. 2 % p .,"- o- - .. ^ ti 7 s 1 'S.•, F t �'j ac t✓ i j f k t s ` t✓tits j e` t!�� ^ rr T & y P1 V,- 'c '11rM 4. .w ,5 '''` r G4,F tY n , v 7 S3 i"rr a J �✓ ]f s1- to I, FR f' "v^r. rTN ,-; ?,- r* t ' t.,' ccrti r ; 0 <a r r 7r t z 4 't t }� f3 `� r tcM cVf r.3 ` r 4�� � 'L" 1 at f M r s -' n/, i 414'',,tt�" +j''�T )Af'Y '�rC`7� jz n•.•s S P r 'i f 5 33 £rrrL+ ✓ $ lrJ.y s�1 7 a+ � 1. tri„ tis ^z / 4? I t vs' r"` r ,- _.ti ^ Hw y tt .. x t i�{^T "'r r,4 ,1-'tia 1 It, r�{0�' , ^+mot'^ e . l ter`- , „ t" , .r.= ^,.r' =•'`; Yac _ 4,2- t-' } ..54 t^ ;r ` h.a' 3 .31• '!S vY 1 li S v r 3- t s w_i q4 l`4 x is R7 3- Y i 4 L:J G i �s 4'44„ ' — ,'4• �• F �-- 1 isr K Y k s 1-1 :t 3 41 " s o )/-. r S ti c S { a ✓rr 73 TERRITORIAL PLACE STILLWATER, MN ...j.1 R , g A IV 1 e A PHASING PLAN Scale 1 =30-0 • ♦ ♦ A • ♦ • 4- • ♦ • 'ea,v♦Fad �` map I PHASING LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION IDBTB AREA NOT N CONTRACT 0 15 30 45 CO EFAIEET:-;: J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NORTH THIRD STEM MTNNBAFO %MINN taT 541 LI 12700 370 n)016 2212 0040 com URN LANNIN Oh2+6FACEONMMUN TES CHrTEC UE u UTI,FE Arrerrt fNAFl t9 rwn MARK RYAN mrt .. 17422 &VISIONS ADDENDUM I AtC Oa F DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 PHASING PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. 0122 04 PROTECT NR 01021 42 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS K K L1 00 1 1 J BUXELL .AL STONE RIAL WALL(TYP ) CONE SRCK wcyy4 DESIGNATED OROPOFF ZCN W CONTRASTING PA NG AREA WI SOLDIER COURSE BANDING (TYP ) PHASING LIMITS 400 GARAGE AREA EXHAUST VAULTS (TYP) DST CORRUGATED METAL E CONNECTED TO STD CONC MANHOLE BY COUNTY CO CRETE LOC TGNS ARE FOR BID PURPOSES 6 FINAL LOCATIONSSIZES WILL NEED COORD NATION EE 4A.8 11 W TIDIER COURSER BANDING(TYP) CONCRETE BR CK PAVER CROSSWALK SOLD ER COURSE HAM) NO (TYP ) • - NSTORICALSTONE —11 TERRTDR AL WALL) YP ) — PHASING LIMBS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS RES DE CE PATIO (TYP) •� VERTICAL CURB ALON▪ G THIS SIDE OF ROAD ONLY TERRITORIAL \GARDENS \\ / \ \� N STORICAL PRISON BUILDING REMNANT WALLS(TYP 1 \ ��v v v \\ \ \ \/! \\ 2 \ \ \' FAtTORVIBLL GRUOSRYP1—\.\ ) 4°4— PEARPA �7? e0/O�NG PO/MI / • LIMESTONE RET WALL ��/\\\� '�' • F /� SEE I/` 1BYClA�STALLSPAVER (ry0IGNATEO I SNOW mi. D COURSE / /\�� `�`'` \ ♦ \ r.nNCTaurrvw\ 1/UJrtc, VERTICAL CURB ILO G THIS S DE OF ROAD ONLY 1 WOOD EETALRAILING (TYP REFLICTION POOL • VERTICAL CURB ALONG • THGS DE OF ROAD if4L — CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT SITE PLAN Scale 1 =20-0 I � 0 10 20 40 HISTORICAL PAISON BUILD NG REMNANT WALLS(TYP 1 1 "C SPRING( ) DES GN TED DRDPOFF ZONE CLAY PAVERS W SOLDIER COURSE BANDING Aft SIBLE CURB (TYP ) en, Stip /VF ACCESSIBLEGURS (TYP) ETE 01 ♦ ♦ ♦ HIST() CAL STONE TEARrtOR AL WALL(TYP ) RESIDENCE r— PATIO (TYP • RMciB<E • ppVER ,• Snyp, - = \CO ♦CO DES ONATED DROPOFFZONE • WI CONTRASTING PAVING • ARE W SOLD ER COURSE SAND` (TYP ) SITE LIMITS LINE ALSO PERTAINS TO IRRIGATION LIMITS ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NORTH THUM STREET MIVNSAPSUS, MINN VET SO LLL 1 1 )33 STT AIL(6 SBW9 0040 v.++ Hn me UNNM OPINSPACL COL. TILS CHTTCNS LA DRf PE TTPITIR RAM CS AM EMT 11.1./.61,112130 MARK RYAN ru Lunt 17428 JLFVLSIONS ADDENDUM DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 SITE PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. 0123 04 PROJECT NR 0102642 DESIGNED JNB DRAWN RS KS L1 10 1 1 J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD NO NORTH 7H®D SIHPST MNNEAPOLI9,MINN 9(11( Sb rtll 1103 733 AIL( 12)33 -OM 19\ / oy °4 °9 Ter op / ry o tea_"'-i�-.-►yam►'� '� SPRINGNek ) ♦� _ _ '__ —_ - Jam--' �y �"� ♦ter /• • •� • z _ % PHASING LIMITS i�� v/r" r• • —I ` 1 l�'7 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT DIMENSION PLAN Scale 1 =20-0 0 10 20 40 Jr� • • • • • • • • S4D1 /♦ 0. %♦ k / --♦ / .„4...\ / '/\ \\ 1 / / ( UP LANNIN OPLNSPAOf COS. TOs CNPrncnm LA WAVE RUM Fan 15 w.xw MARK RYAN loam DATIL nw 17428 REVISIONS ADDENDUM I DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 DIMENSION PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 012904 PROJECT NR 01028.42 DESIGNED JMB DRAWN RS KS L2 10 rip 1 1 Quantity 212 49 65 148 114 59 57 5 II 19 I 738 2128 8877 1629 Symbol e • O 0 • N/A SPRINQr 1 Description Ram Bud 8H 1804 Ram Bad 10H 1804 Ram B rd I2H 1804 Ram Bud 15H 1804 Ram Bird ISSST 1804 Ram Bad 3504-PC 1 5 Ram Bud 5004-PC 2 0 Ram Bud 5004-FC-4 0 Ram Bud 100-DV Ram Bud 150 PGA GI be Rai B d ESP 24LX Pump Stau 1 Class 160 11/2 Class 160 2 Poly 100 1 Poly 1001 1/4 2 • • • 4i -�—rr • e PHASING LIMITS 2 i -1.' 2 �� !%--- 11/4/ 1 1/4 4.4---b,»-i�r i .. r 2 1 ,/»I�.� J1 f--_\2 If — _ ( . ., ,,,, - / �'Y/ aI [fj 1 1/4`R 2 4 11 / 5,1114 I 1 TAT 2 S �1u4 1 �* 0 1- � 1°Ilesmne �• 1 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTROS OF CONSTRUCTOR WMTM AREA NOT a CONTRACT IRRIGATION PLAN Scale 1 = 30 0 0 15 30 45 4.1 OD N U U SPRING/ ) • RE -1114/1112 • I 14a - i .19 • • 1 M1/4 / •�4 •11a ♦ •v 1a V ♦"♦ fib) • d SITE IRRIGATION TO BE UNDER ONE CONTRACTOR FOR ALL TERRA SPRINGS DEVELOPMENTS CONTRACTOR TO BID BY SITE LIMITS VJ czt Li TA 0 Sae P.IaA® GPM MIN Siam PR la Pvr4 J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD 903 OATH TEEM STREET MINNRAPOLI% MINN N Sall LL( Lt MS AX(( U Oal Immjp(r. men IM PLANNING oPINSPACuCOMM INS CHTPCNR LA COCA PC CHMI NRS RAPT CS 1112191CCISIN TKO IMAM,. OINIICATIN MINIM WA. PLII1,111{1 /JONAS NI ILL DAINTEMILI Japan." (MOM OriLM110090 0.1 lawn JIEVICAINR, ADDENDUM 1 a H aEm DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 IRRIGATION PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. 01 23 04 PROJECT NR 01020.42 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS RCS L3 10 1 1 J BUXELL (6) CF (7) GT East (6) GHH (1) EA (3) GHH r.J • o I PHASING LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT AREA TO BE SODDED SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN Scale 1 = 20 -0 0 10 20 40 (1) HB yr— AM —710 rC (4) VC (3)VN 5) CF (�(5) GT (1)TCH -- (2) PP • • (4) VC (3) GB (1) HB (1) GHM — • e�U ace Us (1) GB - (3) EA 2RB SPRING( sr e (16) PO — FOR RFFFRFN(:F TJ111 Y CONTRACTOR SHOULD BID WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARCHITECTURE LTD 90NORIR YHBD smear MNNEAPOLISMNN SOT .0 'Ol-Y 1118310 JUL( 9111210E10 ME UMAIN OPLNSPACI COMM 1111S CRRPCIIN LA 10SC.1PE NPCil'Rj RAPT CS eusaan moral, ran nm1111.1.0 NC MA} AkI SMII•11111.121 MARK RYAN .18 nu 174213 JtEVISJONS ADDENDUM I 4tc Pi* 1-4 AtC F � aE-1 `W l DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 SITE ,LANDSCAPE PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 0123 04 PROJECT NR 01028.42 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS KS L4 10 J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD --� _--,--..� am—i_ r r — —_ r— 1 PHASING LIMITS p, COMMERCIAL GRADE POI EDG NGGYP ) (28) DC (2)WC 18) DC —Oa (2) 6M ()AD— kba / •• CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT AREA TO BE SODDED BUILDING LANDSCAPE PLAN Scale 1 = 20 -0 I 0 10 20 40 6RREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (TYP) 1 (8) DC (8) DC • — (1G) DC —( 0)DC • • • ..th'�.Z . 1 . id • �^1 SPRING( ) v, v (9) SM (9) HA SHREDDED HARDWOOD (B(TAYRCH pK MUL COMNERCIAL GRADE POLY EDGING (TV) (17 DC \; • I 1 1 PLANT LIST 4m • • -1 •` II • U, • _kkk.i • �—ey •—r>♦, KEY COMMON NAME (BOTANICAL NAME 512E IQTY (REMARKS DECIDUOUS TREES j HS I SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST I GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS V INER SKYCOLE 2 1/2 BB 11 I I I EVERGREEN TREES C HA HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE THUTA OCCIDENTALIS HOLMSTRUP #5 2 CONT 9 SHRUBS DC DWARF EUROPEAN CRANBERRYBUSH VIBURNUM OPULUS NANUM #2 CONT 1521 SM MELLOW YELLOW SPIREA SPIRAEATHUNBERGII OGON #1 CONT 7 PERENNIALS [AG I GHOST FERN ATNYRJUM 0I10ST #1 CONT 14 AV I VISIONS ASTILBE ASTILBE CHINENSIS_VISIONS CONT 7 SO I STELLA D ORO DAYLILY HEMEROCALLLS_STELLA D 0R0 _.#1 A l CONT 4 I L— VINES VC I VIRGINIA CREEPER __PARTHENOCISSUS QUINQUEFOLIA #2 CONT 2 NOTE ALL PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE 4 OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH 9u0 ETHTHIRD SIRE. MPNEAPGLIS MINN ILL-( 4 3 Sb I( p m AX( 201A OMO ykrkoJinv 09 PLANNING OPLNSPACI. COMM GIS GIGTACITm LA D9CAPE (SIIh l CRAP( GS MARK RYAN arkru CIAlk NaX 17428 REVISIONS ADDENDUM( DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 BULLDING 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN FINAL PUD SUBNRTTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 0123 04 PROJECT NR 01026.42 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS KS L4 11 1 J BUXELL • l r--r -00 ems_---�-- 00 �ii /�� PHASING LIMITS — _._-1- , fte / CONSTRUCTION LIMITS NOTE AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT AMENITY PLAN Scale 1 = 20 0 0 10 20 40 IMMO • 40. .7 — • \` 6EN' \�� SEE 44_612 / -•TI___ _____ , • INTERPRETIVE MARKER • • • • 1 ay1�♦� 00, SPRING(`) ,.._ .... • •_ • • 4._ SPEED l MR ONE WAY 00 NOT ENTER AMFSSBLE ONLY PARKING STOP NOTE SIGNS MAY BE ONE OR TWO-SIDED STREET SIGNAGE Scale 1/4 = 1 -0 / DROP OFF ONLY YIELD ♦ ♦ INTEI M BENCH TREX LAMINATED PANEL IN TAN NOTE INTERPRETIVE TRAIL MARKERS 8 BENCHES ARE NOT IN CONTRACT ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NORTH T®D 6BHRT MNNRANf IS,MMNESDT 590 L_( 19 TO AX( I2)33 009 m ha o•e 3 LSNN 0 01112.14SPACLaouMU rus CNrrr.C11/11 L.A MrAre .RRTl'N MN LR MARK RYAN DOM nn 7422 NI REVISIONSREVISIONS ADDENDUM I DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 AMENITY PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 0123 04 PROJECT NR 0102642 DESIGNED JNB DRAWN RS KS L5 10 pr 1 - __ CONCRETE COBBLE PAVER INTERPRETWE TRAIL .._ am--�_ an 1-111I 1- 1 _I _I PAVING PLAN Scale 1 =20-0 CONCRETE COBBLE PAVER NTERPRETIVE TRAIL CLA PAVER BAND NO EVERY B (T VP ) A I • t/ B B „♦ • Fes- 0 10 20 40 SIDEWALK 8 VERTICAL CURB SEE CIVIL CLAY BRICK PARKING STRIPPING — ALTERNATED WITH COBBLESTONE STREET PAVERS COBBLESTONE STREET CONC VALLEY GUTTER — 0a SEE DIMENSIONING PLAN PARALLEL PARKING BANDING Scale 1/2 = 1 0 Fr CLAY PAYER BANDING EVERY C (TYP ) K • • • REA • • • • ' CLAY PAVER BANDING W SAY MORTAR JOINTS \ r- 2 MORTAR SETTING BED 4 CONCRETE SASE REINFORCE �(— AS REQUIRED a ( — AGGREGATE SUBBASE ( — PREPARED SUBORADE SPRING( ) • ♦�� BRICK PAVER ON CONC BASE Scale 1 /2 = 1 0 ♦ PARALLEL PARKING STRIP WS NGLE ROW OF CLAY BRICK PAVERS A i • ♦ NIA A we„ C4� ♦ KEY A CONCRETE COBBLE PAVERS LAID IN A COBBLE SERIES PATTERN (CROSSWALKS INTERPR TRAIL) B CONCRETE PERMEABLE PAVERS (ROAD) C CLAY PAVERS (BLDG ENTRIES SIDEWALK INTERSECTIONS) D POURED CONCRETE (SIDEWALKS) E NET PAVE 50 (ANGLED PARKING STALLS) NOTE ALL BRICK BANDING & DETAILS TO BE DONE IN CLAY PAVERS NOTE INTERPRETIVE TRAIL NOT IN CONTRACT FOR REFERENCE ONLY J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD r 9113 ROHIB TROD STREET BAPDLN . NMNESOT 340 111-4 In 3m AK(( N ONO •Anojko can UB NANN NG OPLNSPACL CONN TILS CNTrnLTVRR CRC -APR f] OUT / CRAP! CS RN truser AND INAS AM uft MARK RYAN NAM 17428 WINISIONN ADDENDUM DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 PAVING PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 01 23 04 PROJECT NR 0102642 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS ICS L5 11 1 1 J BUXELL =L III... I= .arr EII�lrr. 1\ffi =11�`I''._ � �,L-1 I- 7I,I= . II'_' _ —� —__1 I h11 =I I� = �I - II I-, 11J= I; Trf- 1! - ----a-----:,,--.-:1 .LL= F j I`I 0 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE =1111EIII 'ir" =nii=nR m=mom ::::;: UIEnu= ='RILL 111 II llo=nN III=IIII= I -11i =iii = :. !•Il-0(Il- -IIII=IIII= 1IIII=1111EIIII=111 =)III-IIII III=1111II_ Il11'. III I E BII=1111=1111E. 1111EI III=IIII= =1111E1111= 1=1111=1I1-1111=IIII— IIII=1111EUII (_ E L AMP U - j) r P r A ) L.RL 1 I - C l 1 >T VII F If AL � m HE J IL A A ML 2 AI J FAS EN TRUNK TO STAKE WITH FABRIC TREE TING IF REOUIRED LOCATE ANCHOR STAKE 18 AWAY FROM TR E TRJN( ON SIDE OF PREVAILING WIND RAIL IRON 5 AKE OR ACCEPTABLE WOODEN SUBSTITUTE ANCHOR F RMLY CROWN OF ROOT BALL SHALL BEAR SAME RELATION (OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE) TO FINISHED GRADE AS IT BORE TO PREVIOUS GRADE SHREDDED BARK MULCH 75mm (3) NIN CREATE SOIL SAUCER W TH TOPSOIL 50mm (8') MIN. CUT AND R MOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP IF NON BIODEGRADABLE WRAP S USED REMOVE TOTALLY REPARED TOPSOIL MIX OR CLEAN SUBSOL COMPACT SUBSOIL 10 FORM PEOE5IAL AND PREVENT sETTUNG NOTE STAKE ONLY ON WINDY SITES OCONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DIAME-ER OF EXCAVATION TO BE MIN 300mm (12 ) BEYOND SPC DF RO OTS 41/' -IIII 111 — — EII11_1111 _ _ �01 �.> IIII IIII iii—ilii— =1111=1111-1111=111 1111=IIII= 111=311— =1111=1111—111=1111 IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=11111111=111 IIII—IIII=III@IIII=IIII=111E-1111—IIII=IIII—IIII=IIII-1111— =1111=11110111=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=IIII=1111EIIII=IIII PRUNE 1/3 OF CROWN BY THINNING AND SPACING BRANCHES 00 NOT CUT THE LEAO4R FASTEN TRUNK TO STAKE WITH FABRIC TREE RING (SEE NEW PLANTING TECHNIQUES) T RAIL IRON STAKE OR GALVANIZED 1 0 D PIPE ANCHOR FIRMLY SET TREE HIGHER IN RELATION TO N W GRADE AS TO PREv1OUS GRADE SHREDDED BARK MULCH (MIN 2') CREAT SOIL SAUCER (MIN 6 ) WITH TOPSOIL CLEANLY PRUNE ALL DAMAGED ROOT ENDS AN TO SOIL MIX AROUND ROOT SYSTEM AND WATER IN LAYERS OF SOmm (6 ) NOTE SOAK ROOTS IN WA ER OVERNIGHT BEFORE PLANTING 3ODECIDUOUS TREE BARE ROOT PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE = 1 — = b1= —1 — __ —111-1 = = ON SHRUB PLANTING ON SLOPE DETAIL 1 OMULTI STEM TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SOIL SEPARATOR FILTER UATERYIL 100mm (4-) PERFORATED PIPE WHERE APPLICABLE PERFORATIONS WO DOWN UNDER DRAIN IP L C P JF L A RJBBER HOSE ON JkCH MAJOR STEM ALL MAJOR STEMS SHOULD BE WIRED TOGETHER SET THE AT ORIGINAL GRADE MULCH PINE BARK OR WOOD CHIPS 75mm (3-) MIN SOIL SAUCER LSE PREPARED TOPSOIL 150mm (6 ) MIN WOOD STAKES (3) IN FIRM SOIL ROP 5 Al LOP OF BALL SI-ALL B CUT R MOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP NON -BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE TOTAL " REMOVED PREPARED AOMIXIURE BACKFILL PREPARED SURGRADF P DES AL SOFT VELCRO OR OTHER FABRIC WRAP 3 GUY WIRES IF REQUIRED WHITE FLAG ON EACH TO INCREASE VISIBILITY AVOID TIGHT CUY WIRES AS THEY PREVENT NATURAL SWAY TURNBUCKL (3) GALVANIZED 0R DIP —PAIN ED SET REE AT ORIGINAL CRAOE MULCH SHREDDED BARK OR 75mm (3) MIN SOIL SAUCER USE GOOD TOPSOIL 150mm (6') MIN WOOD DEAOMEN (3) ROPES AT TOP OF BALL SHALL BE cur REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP NON -BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL SHALL 6E TOTALLY REMOVED PREPARED TOPSOIL MIX OR CLEAN SUBSOIL COMPACTEDSETTLING SUBSOIL TO FORM PEDESTAL 70 PREVENT NOTES 1 00 NOT ALLOW 4R POCKETS TO FORM WHEN BACKFILLING 2 LEAVE 250mm (10 ) 0 STAKE ABOVE GRADE FOR REMOVAL 3 TREE PIT TO STREET PIT UNDERORAINAGE CONNECTION WHERE APPLICABLE ♦ TREE SHALL BE SECURED WITH 3 CLAY WIRES SPACED 120 DEGREES APART TREE SHALL STAND PLUMB GUY WIRES TO BE REMOVED AT END OF GUARANTEE PERIOD 5. TREES NEED TO 8E WIRED ONLY WHERE EXTREME WIND (1-3 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL OR VANTLUISM MAKES sucH SUPPORT NrrrssATr NOT TO SCALE — 11=III Ilk_'II11= III=1�1- = 11 =IIII } •: � ::ti•; —IIII IIl III 111— -1111 1 II .,. N;=/N1— 111=1111 r 1111=111=IIII=11' �=IIII=IIII 111E1111=ii1r •111=1111=1 nI=1111=1111-1U11=IIII= I11—UII—II I= I =1f 1=1 I— IIIE 1= I = 11 PLANT LIST SITE 4 KEY COMMON NAME _I BOTANICAL NAME_.. SIZE QTY REMARKS DECIDUOUS HB TREES HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDPNTAI IC 7 1/7 BB I 2 PO RB PIN OAK RIVER BIRCH QUERCUS PALUSTRIS 2_1/2 B8_J_16 IBETULA NIGRA 2 1/2 BB 12 SWOJSWAMP TCH WHITE THORNLESS COCKSPUR OAK QUERCUS BICOLOR 2 1/2 B8 3 HAWTHORN CRALAEGUSCRUS GALLIS V INERMIS 85 CONT 1 I SHRUBS I EA I DWARF BURNING BUSH EUONVMUS ALATUS COMPACTA 6 1 4 II IlM_DANDL• WINTERBERRY ILEX VERTICILLATA JIM DANDY 118 IR RED SPRITE N R IVEPP R-AG11 GLOBE BLUE' T Rj N , VRC N • NIAj BE R IL., NTI NANNYBETRRV N I PERENNIALS 1 BL CF G BLACKBERRY LILY BELAMCANDA CHINENSIS #1CDNT 120 CARDINAL FLOWER LOBELIA CARDINAUS #1 CONT 111 GOATSBEARD ARUNCUS DIOICUS #1 CONT 4 GRASSES I GHH HAENSE HERMES SWITCH GRASS PANICUM VIRGATUM HAENSE HERMES #1 CONT 19 GHM HEAW METAL SWITCH GRASS I PANICUM VIRGATUM HEAW METAL #1 CONT I 1 TUFTED HAIR GRASS I DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA #1 CONT 1 12 _GT 1 _VINES VC VIRGINIA CREEPER PARTHENOCISSUS QUINQUEFOLIA #2 CONT I 8 NOTE ALL PLANTING BEDS TO HAVE 4 OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH EVENLY DISPERSE WETLAND PLANTS PER AREA 18 ON CENTER ARCHITECTURE LTD 900 NORTH TAD MOST MINNRAPOI" MTNN69K1T 040 (114 433 TA AX16 03 004 1.1mA= can A LAWN OPL SPAO.COMMUNmlS ORIFCTVII avara TTPrn RA LS 111=1160141-rt. MS MUM.. .,. MARK RYAN 441 run DAM 17428 REVISIONS ADDENDUM t; a a g a F DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 LANDSCAPE DETAILS FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE PROIE(.T NR DESIGNED DRAWN 01 23 01 01026.42 JHB RS KS L6 10 1 1 J BUXELL 8 FINISHED GRADE T1—'�, IIL g 3-0 38' /- DIAM GRATE SIMLLAR TO EXTERIOR STAIR TREADS ON BLDG SEE SPECIFICATIONS n r I 4 SPLIT FINISH ONTONE LL AEXPOSED NE SDES (VIP ) —FINISHED GRADE (TVP ) FASTENED 4 4 3RS ANGLE METAL BAND TO STANDARD 3-8' DIAM CONC MANHOLE 3 DIAM STANDARD MANUFACTURED CONC MANHOLE (TYP) _ 32' DIAM METAL / CORRUGATED PIPE L I 2% r WASHED GRAVEL (TYP ) 8 COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE (TYP) 6 FOUNDATION DRAIN TILE EXHAUST VAULT DETAIL Scale 1/2 = 1 0 i r 25 RIGID INSULATION 3AX TYPE Y GYP BOARD ).J 12' CNU FOUNDATION WALL SEALANT 0 INTERIOR & EXTERIOR JOINT ENT MECHANICAL Al INTAKE LOUVER 318' TYPE Y GYP BOARD PAINTED ON EXIwEO GARAGE SIDE SEALANT 0 NTERIOR & EXTER OR JOINT 5/8 EXT TREATED SHEATHING ADHERE TO R38 INSULATION 2 3 5 CONC GARAGE SLAB — SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR FOOTING 6 FOUNDATION PLANS (TVP) —) 12' CMU FOUNDAT ON WALL (TYP ) r —6 POURED N PLACE CONC (TYP ) SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR EXHAUST VAULT OILS 6 S 2E (TYP ) —SCREEN EXHAUST VENT SET INTO WALL — SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR REOUIRED OPEN NG 6 VAULT SIZE (TYP ) l_ 6 PERFORATED DRAIN TILE CONNECTED TO FOUNDATION DRAIN TILE EXCAVATE CENTER OF MANHOLE FOOTING BASE & PLACE UNCOMPACTED PEA GRAVEL IN CENTER FOR DRA NAGE (TYP ) BLOCK IS 1 OFF PROPOSED FLOOR ELEV 5 CONC GARAGE P SLAB (TYP I SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR FOOTING & FOUNDATION PLANS (TYP) 4— SEE STRUCTURAL FOR HEADER L( HEAD 0 EL 714-2 ALIGN WOARAGE DOOR HEAD , ( — HEAD 0 EL 7 ALIGN W/GARAGE DOOR HEAD I� I H \� I ld, SECTION @ AIR INTAKE LOUVER CONC SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL CAPS !� CONC. SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL UNITS SILT BACK OF TOP EXPOSED LAYERS OR I — STACK UNITS BACK TO BACK AS NEEDED FINISHED pGRADE / 771 1) -6 COMPACTED BASE PERF DRA N TILE IN SOCK CONNECTED TO TRENCH DRAIN IN DRIVE ENTRANCE PEA GRAVEL STONE MULCH DOWN TO DRAIN TILE Scale 1 /2 = 1 0 1 T SAW CUT OR FORMED DRA NAGE CHANNEL FLUSH WI CONC GUTTER APRON (TIP ) — 5 CONC DRIVE (TYP ) COMPACTED BASE (TYP ) DRAINAGE CHANNEL DETAIL Scale 1 = 1 0 1r 2 DELT CAST CONCRETE CAP REBAR WELD ROUND PLATES TO WHALER 6 STEEL FBEAM W/ ( POURED CONCRETE 1 ,B EXISTING STONE WALL 3-0" DIAM CORE DRILL \ STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR EXISTING STONE WALL WALL SUPPORT Scale 1/2' = 1 0' DRAINAGE CURB DETAIL Scale 1 = 1 0 /-5 —1— —1 2 CAST IRON ORATE A FRAME NEENAH R 4881 DX 6CONC DRIVEW 1 SO SAW CUTS SEE DRIVEWAY PLAN — CONC TRENCH DRAIN WI I4 120 C }ao LAT&BOC LONG 1 6 6 COMP GRANULAR F LL — TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL 1-Ise-1 B CONC RET WALL (TIP) STANDARD B5/12 CURB & GUTTER (TYP ) SAW CUT OR FORMED DRAINAGE CHANNEL FLUSH WICONC GUTTER APRON (TYP BOTTOM OF CHANNEL (TYP ) —SCONC DRIVE(TYP) COMPACTED BASE (TYP) SEALANT OVER BACKER STL INSUL GARAGE DOOR PAINTED SEE SCHEDULE 1IY STEP IN SLAB BELOW DOOR 1 12' RIGID INSULATION COMPACTED SUBGRADE OR UNDISTURBED SO L Scale 1 = 1 0 ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NOBTR THAD main MNNTAPDLri, MTNN SOT 1141 U4 311 ) S AX ( 11.13 ASS m me UP. LsNNIN OPLNSPAdf CO,MNUN UR LA MCA PE CJ1I/ 0.0 SAFI fCS Www n 11112,16,110230..MARE RYAN INTL 0 17426 $EVLSIONS ADDENDUM DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 SITE DETAILS FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 012301 PROJECT NR 01020.42 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS KS L6 11 1 PLAN SIDE ELEVATION NIC SIDE ELEVATION PLAN SIDE ELEVATION END ELEVATION PLAN VIEW FROM BOTTOM \ 1 CURVED BOTTOM TAPERED LEGS �I ml • 1 348„ 12' EXTENSION 3 — ALONG BOTTOM OTY 13 ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS Scale 1 = 1 0 g▪ ,3,,, 1412 /4 2 3 12' / INTERPRETIVE BENCH ELEMENT A S1 / 13 / OTY 2 GO. INSIDE BEA 3 (12 INNSIDE BEAM) INTERPRETIVE BENCH ELEMENT 13 N9# 1 1/4 33_ 11 , g,_-8' 11/ 2-111? 3J_LI/2 1/, 8 —/ 1/4 11 1 f1 1 5 /4 /- — 31LI2 ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS Scale 1 = 1 0 NIC OTY 11 3 NIC NIC PLAN 61t 2 2 2 112 / 2 Se -OVERHANG rLAMINATED BEAM 0 0 c 0 / L LAG BOLT W/SPACER 8 WASHER FRONT / 1 $_14 ELEVATION INTERPRETIVE BENCH 'A' OUARRIED ST CRO X LIMESTONE BASE, DRESSED FINISHED ALL EDGES ROUNDED 8 WEATHERED IN APPEARANCE r PAVING SURFACE 1P m\ r \ /4 1 1 11 / ?1 1�412., 11 SDE ELEVATION (3) 2 X 8 GLUELAM BEAN — 14 2' SPACER — (8) 2 X 8 GLUELAN BEAM Scale 1 = 1 -0 3 19' 0 0 0 PLAN 10 3359' LT CI 34 5/8 OVERHANG LAM NATED BEAM / 0 0 134 OPEN LAG BOLT WI SPACER & WASHER OUARRIED 8T CROIX UMESTONE BASE DRESSED FINISHED ALL — EDGES ROUNDED 8 WEATHERED IN APPEARANCE r PAVING SURFACE INTERPRETIVE BENCH 'B' Scale 1 =1-0 FRONT / ELEVATION 2 5 1 4 r • GLUE LAM TO FIT INS DE _ BEAM POCKET -(3) 2 X 6 GLUELMI BEAM —1/4 1?SPACER (B) 2 X 8 GLUELAM BEAM / SIDE ELEVATION / C5) NIC NIC W �, C1A��i`�cYXvk' 'S el1 .1 ✓y / .,� 70 k.4,6 A b l ▪ 'e 3'� c 4" - 1 7 _o ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS PHOTO Not to Scale ARCHITECTURAL PEDESTAL PHOTO Not to Scale FOR REFERENCE ONLY J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD 90O NORTB THIRD STR28T MINNBAR/Mq MINNERM SAO w 111 3773 AIL( -ONO ...JaP USA IANNIN OPLNSPACII COASSIONITIS CNRPCTu4 LA I3ICAPE MlrERL 8 GRAB CS MO THAT .1117121.10 MARK RYAN ▪ rin w a.41 17428 REVISIONS ADDENDUM I DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 SITE DETAILS FINAL PIN SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 0123 04 PROJECT NR 01026.42 DESIGNED JHB DRAWN RS KS L6 12 J BUXELL L. (H` 8 // 130 8 13 18 4 IIIIIIII)1II11IIII111111)II1)IIIIIIIIIIIIII11IIIIIIIII11 —74 / 1 -8 / 3.4 /— / 4- 4 (D�— (C, UP Ill `Jl (c� *GB SLOPE DOINN 19 m Ir as U.,d 9 7 MECHANICAL 8-8 ❑ (L_ 92' 8-B. ❑ (( 92 L—)ll 9 T 9 2' 9 2' B-8 OOOOOJOOOOOOQOOOa I I IU_) Im I 1 I IIm I i C3, 1 /L,) I ry I ; Im C ELEVATOR EOU P ILL 1Q u II» UNEXCAVATED 4 • te (H) 19 / 24 '2) GARAGE FLOOR PLAN 22 075 GSF Scale 1/8 =1 0 3 15 1 (3) (4) (5) 12 (6) (7) 2L I I I 9 199 ( 8 ) (9) 16 e 12 / 6i (12) (13) 26 8 11 19" (15) (15) ) — --(A) ARCHITECTURE, LTD 906 NOR H TH91D MEET eINNEAPOLIS, MINVEVYI Sm 11116 UWS 3713 A.16 11 5010 ...den m. UR LA NM) OPNSPACL COMM Nine9 CMIF.CRIP LA MSC CHITEPTIM *? CR6AP CS macreCEIErvbArnSIMILLAVAL Noll. AM ma LArArnArL. AlliarisuraASOLL na DATA NARK RYAN 17428 DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 GARAGE PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. 12304 PROJECT NR. 01026 40 DESIGNED 318111.18 DRAWN NJ8 A 1 to J BUXELL (H� 74 4 i3_4 4 /3 1 / 3d_/! 538 / 3-6-/ UP 16 „Zr/ 3-9 / 3-0 / 3-4_/ 34 .-/_ UP 37-8 fa 9 8_ L 1 UP UP 74 7-4 / a / 8 / 10. _�'4 i 4$ 3 �r Tr ❑ _r/ 3 0_/ 3 8_/ 347_, UP /2 r/ 38 T 1 34 / 74% 7-0 / 1741H 9-51N 1,516; 3'-' , 3-8' / 5 1N / 341 3-P / 343 4 11 _/ 3� / 3-0_/ 736H �� P n3' '3\ 1� a 00.00 0. 00 , 0 00 JP DN (A) IT� UNIT L1 47I eli UNIT D LOWER LEVEL 44-81 4 UNIT F3 UNIT L1 REVERSE CM814 46 a N. /S 8314 / 7-0_/ S / S L12' / 36.4, 3 5_/ 51518 /_5/ 3 5 / 3-8_„ if 714 / 7S 7815- 4 7$_j 3-8 _a 4 5/ 34_/ 3-8 „ 5_45. 3_-e/ 3-8 / S 7 1M / 3-8_/ 3 SS 141 SS 141 3' UNITE 17. UNIT C LOWER LEVEL UNIT FI 44 10' 512' STOR STOR STOR 5 7A1L, S 1 7,8_, 5 1 13_, S 1 793p 5 1Y Jr- STOR N� ei STOR - Nt mil 5 4112' UNIT Al UNITGI (REVERSE) 34 1034 UNIT G I PLANTE PLANTER UP - UP PLANTER UNIT El 37 JANITOR UP I ON \\I UP LORRY MAIL ROOM 45 14 14 LANTE P a Rz UNIT B1 W, PLANTE UP 8/I/9/3•41 / 4 /34 / 4 33d / FIRST FLOOR PLAN 16 890 GSF Scale 1 /8 = 1 0 UP 34 / 4_/ 3i/ 4_/ 34-/_ /3� / 4 /34 / 4 /34 • -/ 3-4 / 4_/34 / 4 /74 j 4 31 A_f 3-4 j 4 UP 3-4 / 4_ / 34 / 4 / 34 34 / 4 / 3J /L$/ 3-/ 3'• /-/ 3;___ 1a 10' / 1! ARCHITECTURE LTD 900 NORTHIHE(D MEET MMNE.IM V1NNESOT 3540 ILL( 311111 l)I A1C(6 D 0040 merJewel mm UR PLA NIN D910v59ACL COMM WT1115 CRITFGTUP LW:K M PCNIIC RAA M C9 MARX RYAN 17428 4tt a O ` Iu^W DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 FIRST LEVEL PLAN FINAL PIMD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. 12304 PROJECT NR 0102$ 40 DESIGNED AWL MA9 DRAWN M33 A111 J BUXELL UP UNITF tommici r 7 r UNIT F2 UNIT E5 UNITC UPPER LEVEL UNIT O UPPER LEVEL UNIT l2 REVERSE o oer I SECOND FLOOR PLAN 16 384 GSF Scale 1 /8 = 1 0 STOR STOR STOR JJ UNIT E2 STOR ay STOR STOR UNIT A2 UNITM 1 MECHANICAL/ ELECTR CAL UNIT L2 1 UP ON UNIT 92 ARCHITECTURE, LTD 903 NORTE TIMID STR00 1.411.13.111.1% VINNESOT sw 111y6121116 ]TI7 AIl1 1111 ONO • mo mJ man R PLA 'NN OPLNSPACllC060.1 NI11LLS CIRITCIVOR LANISSCA 111,11131 GRAD C9 MARK RYAN MIL wp 17428 d 0 H DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 SECOND LEVEL PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 12304 PROJECT NR 0102540 DESIGNED JIB MJS DRAWN MJS A112 J BUXELL oI It:::: tt il t 1 k Y f UNIT FS LOWER LEVEL UNIT K 11rt11 r11i3 1 11111 11111� radaJYGYdi i UNITG2(REVERSE) UNIT G2 lact 11l t31 UIIY TT1 113 11{11311 UNITG2(REVERSE) UNIT G2 UNIT J UNIT G3 UNIT H LOWER LEVEL x —a 1 UNITH LOWERV REEL SE) _3 —4— UNIT H LOWER LEVEL MECHAN CAL/ ELECTRICAL UNITOWER L3 RELEVVERSE) LEL UN T E3 LOWER LEVEL -�{;+;;iil+i;'++— J. I; 1111511111111 I1tr_,_J 1:11111 UNIT l3 LOWER LEVEL tiltfil 111rt1tlit Li LL1Lli"1lLLJ D UNIT G3 ARCHITECTURE LTD S00 NORTH THIRD STREET NV M43 71778IJS, M EKf TTl1 3,R Z{1)R 7T) ARC W C010 UR LA NES13 OYINSPACI.MAN VITLL9 CTT1111 UR lA CSC B RCHRITT<W,LR MAP CS NUJ RN AY CUL MARK RYAN DAM 17428 DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 THJRO LEVEL PLAN FINAL PUD SUBhIITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE. 12304 PROJECT NR 01026 40 DESIGNED JIB 11.68 DRAWN MJR A113 THIRD FLOOR PLAN 16 775 GSF Scale 1re = 1 -0 0 J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD 996 NORTH THIRD STREET OINRAPOL , AGNNEVTT 940 111I6 WS 371 AIy )LT UDW L UNIT K UPPER LEVEL UNIT L3IREVERSE) UPPERR LEVEL ATTIC SPACE 7 728 GROSS SF UNIT E3 UPPER LEVEL UNIT L3 UPPER LEVEL UNIT UPPER LEVEL UNIT UPPER LEVEL (REVERSE) UNIT H UPPER LEVEL UR LA T11N OPLNSPACE CORM WT1119 CRTTWTUR OSTUR CARS CARS RCHTRZRIRR GRAN C9 CT ICOR CCU./ HARK RYAN 47428 rek 0 W F F 1:0a DEVELOPER ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 FOURTH LEVEL PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 17304 PROJECT NR 01076 60 DESIGNED A18 HJB DRAWN HiS A114 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 2 493 GROSS UNIT SF Scale 1/8 = 1 0 J BUXELL OD OD ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ED OD ED OD ROOF PLAN Scale 1/8 = 1 0 ep ARCHITECTURE LTD 900 NORTH THIRD STREET MINNU PO 9, 1mrvo9m 910 TLLY6ESUM TI AR/ 11E trwg,JM 99n UR PLANNING OP1115PACI COMM `OTOS CRiwwcT7R LA 119CA P9 MHREYT7R RAM B RCULEADLIN OK Wall AS DLITALIID AICDMICULDIDODI D. LAN IV DUE AIL DO 110411501, MARK RYAN uFa 17420 DEVELOPER ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 ROOF PLAN FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 72304 PROJECTNR 0I02040 DESIGNED AIB MJO DRAWN Ma A115 FT r J BUXELL • w 44. 11 / i III TRANSVERSE BUILDING SECTION Scale 1/8 =1 0 II UR ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NORTH THIRD MEET AIM.*muq MINN m 0441 ILL16 7338 71 .46 TV 0040 Ir-J0wt1 tam RIR MA NIt° OPINSPAGL OOMN WTRl9 arrTACTURR LA[SCAN 0.CHMUTErT71R R GRAM C9 MICE UNDER MI' IELIC71121,.. MARK RYAN DAM a 17418 a a � d Oa w DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 BUILDING SECTIONS FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 11304 PROJECT NR. 01016 40 DESIGNED ABMS DRAWN PUB A310_ 0 LONGITUDINAL BUILDING SECTION Scale 1/8 =1 0 ASPHALT SHINGLES J BUXELL ROOF DECK 144 TFFE N dis THIRD FLOOR LOFT N, 1475•FFE A THIRD FLOOR Y 1315FFE 4' SF_CONDFLOOR 19 1 FFE FIRST FLOOR A UPPER LEVEL Y OS-4 FFE 1M �B' FIRSTFFFER LOO LOBBY-O S 100FFE A AMOE —\ Y VARIES f WE 011 L CEMENT BD LAP SIDING TYP — FACE BRICK ,MJ • .I LI!!h 16Ipoig 11111111 9T— 11111 111 IIMECEIMEI w1 WI NE W6 �v\ El W2 v2 W2 W1 WI v nnrnnnn.(� ri IP1 [11111_I 11111� 111 11111 raa 1111111�I 11111 I'1 EAST ELEVATION Scale 1/8 = 1 0 ASPHALT SHINGLES TYP CEMENT BD LAP SID NG TYP PREFINISHED MTL COPING TYP FACE BRICK 0 STAIR TOWER —� A ROOFDECK \ ,2T LOFT 1RD5'M _ A THIRD FLOOR 31 5 FFE SECOND FLOOR 1B 1 FFE FIRST FLOOR ALIIPPERLEVFI Y N 5 F F E F1RST FLOOR 104 OBEY 00-O• FFE A GARAGE Y VARIES n\ STAINED CEDAR TRELLIS SYSTEM O 3RD FL BALCONIES TYP \itG R JI CEMENT BD TRIM 0 WOWS TYP 10 0 HEAD (CURVED 0 3R0 FL ) 1 4 0 SILL 1122 0 JAMBS OALV CORRUGATED MTL PANELS ATTACHED VERT TYP ASPHALT SHINGLES GALV CORRUGATED MTL PANELS ATTACHED VERT TYP PREFINISHED METAL COPING STAINED CEDAR TREWS SYSTEM 0 3RD FL BALCONIES, TYP POWDER COATED ALUM RAIL SYSTEM, TYP CEMENT BD TRIM OWDWS TYP 1K8 0 HEAD (CURVED 0 3RD FL ) 140SILL 1R 0 JAMBS CEMENT BD LAP S D NO TYP PRECAST CAP w CONT JOINTS 0 4-0 0 C TYP EXISTING BRICK WALL POWDER COATED ALUM RAIL SYSTEM TYP PRECAST CONC SILL, TYP STEEL STAIR TYP PATCH B REPAIR EXIST DOOR OPENING w/ SALVAGED BRICK TO MATCH ADJACENT EXIST NG WDW OPENINGS CEMENT BD TRIM O BALCONY DOORS TYP TOO HEAD 112 ®JAMBS ASPHALT SHINGLES TYP :�••.•.•—•••••••—•••••••�— ••• ••••••••••• ••• ••••" • ••' "'•" •':::: ATTACHED VERT ABOVE FLAT ROOF ii�`1�3gtfi$f;33b#�1�;4#ii�B#mix# c# i ESSif;1IIIR3�'J qk�)#NSII R3'SAC#NE#t IRbiz##Sgb#Ib ISK IE##E'• K't&.#'! S 11'M'1MWW2:11hY15WWMIRYVt t1tNV/NEIWRIRSNWJR;.7.1R.WRR.1W':.WRl7l'fllRhYNN�LWVl:1R:hWlR.ttYYA11L5W!! :.YlW11B5YA'7R11M(llf jtY�IlA�LWllllhWXA�11Y::fH111YN7/RStW:T111WJXR.YLW111111WfXA:Y1PlR.111WfA115YX:1A551M'AIMY'fR.5WWJ11l15YLYlAf.SMA.f ::fW .._ \ •.h wM#1W jtYl awasW1�lf lwlll*\WV� Afl WVJIWWXLNY1:tYJVNhMt..YK•:AVllA151�INMLY.%XlAW7JY7.'7l.:YVMY.tWJJIX7JW.5KW VlIIIRYVllhtt{..%AR{lY}J%1lVJWN.WW.tMtYWIRhSYYAW.5aN W::.:WR55YVAYMYY fMWWAR:WJAIWNYI}ALVAYXAIY:WAN#51YlAIrWIffMIVY ..itlXllM YAVAI... an iii (Cr:: f �>�Sf Ff +?s i�Rti� 1: sx t # > i�ya s v1: , rsir lAwf r «�I�11>$'s; s s" tsar ' Hirai i lEa� " # 11 Tern _.. • 5 W 1 tNNtWfANWYYYA YlAWVYl.'•' AW■1 "' YY'MLtSYY • 51VAI 415E """'-'•�. �JRM1.— N i "' Y S 11 'A. i5"8 f IYIJ lh l• !• Al11IL.5"li 1l1 t� 4\1W 4R l Y� Y_\ __ _.._.__ A ___ fA -- __rl _N�"""�' ♦<' '/R W... �RN91VJl: L 5W WI W1 W1 W1 = W1 STEEL STAIRS TO PATIOS TYP — RRAILLSYSTEMER ATED ALUM SOUTH ELEVATION Scale 1/8 = 1 0 IIIII III 11111(11 II I HILT 1111111 111111 11111 IIIBI 1.1 IO PIMP a WiA Wt I IN 5WA =A I F-1 IE1 alI. W�A 1 W A i 1 V MA _ 1 1 $] II1 C >M) 1 w1 � w SVII wv w1 5N1 E w+l ! 1 w1 CIw1 I YJI 1 wl C f 1 d-1MI1 I-T_. �—� _ x PRECAST GONG SILL TIP — / STRUCTURAL BRICK 0 PERIMETER PATIO WALLS ABOVE CONC SLAB. TYP BR CK VENEER@ PERIMETER PATO WALLS BELOW CONC SLAB, TYP PRECAST CONC CAP TYP -- FULL- UTE INSUL FIBERGLASS DOOR / 01ST FLOOR PAT OS TYP OPEN' O ARCHITECTURE, LTD 900 NORTH 12IDID STREET NINNRAM1Ll4 M1NNESOT 34O 11J4 12133E 3713 AX-16 2133 4019 weLenox corn LIR CANNING OPLASJAa. COP. N17E13 CRRFCRRR LA DSCAIR RERUN GM/ f3 MARK RYAN DATIL 17428 W a At 0 DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 BUILDING ELEVATION FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE 12304 PROJECT NR 01026 40 DESIGNED 2718 MAI DRAWN RJe AS 10 ASPHALT SHINGLES, TYP J BUXELL OOF DFECFEK THIRD FLOOR LOFT IIYSFFE •FLOOR THIRD 131 5 F F E SECOND FLOOR 110 I1 FFE F RST FLOOR L UPPER LEVEL 1. 085 FFE LO 134FIRSTFYFFOER 4 ILDO-0'FFE GARAGE VARIES — O1 TL-JC IIIII .IIIIIII R=111E111 11111 I L__ JIWIJ JUUI W4 W4 L. 94 E IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII WI wl =A 9 WI w WS WS III II I I ' III FACE BRICK 0 PERIMETER PATIO WALLS TYP -- WEST ELEVATION Scale 1/8 = 1 -0 Y 14ATFFE ROD; DECK 1 $ THIRD FLODR LOT THIRD ROOEK Y 131-5 FF A SECOND FLDOR� Y 11911 FFE FIRST FLOOR UPPER LEVEL 08-8 FFE OPEN THROUGH — PRECAST CONC L NTEL FACE BRICK 0 STAIR TOWER TYP GALV CORRUGATED MTL PANELS ATTACHED VERT TYP STAINED CEDAR TREW S ABOVE 3RD FL BALCONIES TYP CEMENT BD TR M 0 WDWS TYP 1 r8 0 HEAD (CURVED 0 3RD FL ) 1R406LL 192 0 JAMBS CEMENT BD LAP S D NG TYP POWDER COATED ALUM RAILING TYP STEEL STAIR TYP FACE BRICK 0 PERIMETER PATIO WALLS TYP OPEN THROUGH W6 r— n •FIRST FT" 019 FFE 4i r rs I -�LOBBY • _ _ II Y 100-0 FFE R d GARAGE �\ Y VARIES i1 BB Wt I W1 W11 w W1 w1 1N1 W1 r IOL 1 I 11 W1 W3 W3 IIIIIIIIIIIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIII W1 WI 11 W nnnne W3 vet W1 w1 w1 7I Of 1 WI W1 WI WI 091 1 nnn rir 111111 111111I 111111� I IIIIIII w1 121 11 1111111111111'11111111111111 1 T N W V)t W1 w1 WI 4k ASPHALT SH NOLES TYP GALV METAL PANELS ATTACHED VERT TYP STAINED CEDAR TREWS 0 9RD FL BALCONIES TIP PREFINISHED METAL COPING. TYP CEMENT BD TRIM 0 WDWS TYP 140 HEAD (CURVED 0 3R0 FL ) 1940 S LL 1R 0 JAMBS CEMENT BD LAP SIDING TYP FACE BRICK 0 STAIR TOWER PRECAST CONC CAP TYP STRUCTURAL BR CK 0 PERIMETER PATIO WALLS AVOVE LONG SLAB, TYP FACEL BRICK 0 PER METER PATIO WALLS BELOW CONC SLAB TYP FACEL BRICK 0 PERIMETER PAT 0 WALLS BELOW CONC SLAB TYP PRECAST CONC SILL TYP STEEL STAIR TYP ARCHITECTURE, LTD 90 NOATB T®1D 5D1PPT INNEAPOU%NINN POT 3.10 IA 13311 )m ARX 11 0040 mJ (Am UR LA OPLNSPACRC5MN T1119 CRDPCNR LA ISCA CJIRTCIVR GRAD CS I.0111.1 PA Old ILUSITJAD Amor Nun:1MA DAR NARK RYAN 17478 DEVELOPER. ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES BUILDING 4 BUILDING ELEVATION FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE L2304 PROJECT NR 07026 40 DESIGNED JHB NJB DRAWN N)B A5 11 NORTH ELEVATION Scale 1/8 = 1 0 PRECAST CONC LINTEL PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/04-07 Planning Commission Date February 9, 2004 Project Location 1521 West Olive Street Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Zoning District RA Applicants Name Kirk Roetman Type of Application Variance Project Description Request for street side yard setback (30 feet required, 8 feet proposed) Discussion The -request is a variance to the street side yard setback The addition - would be in line with the existing residence A large pine tree is located on the west side of the site that limits some other locations Recommendation Approval Attachments Application form and plans PLANNING ADMINISTT TION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 RECEIVED JAN 2 2 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Case No Date Flleti Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED L.ilf:-YN1 1✓ Special/Conditional Use Permit _ �C', Vanance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment' Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (r e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application o supporting matenal will delay the application process Address of Project ► s- Zoning Distnct PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Assessor's Parcel No fig0//// o74- �t i2' (GEO Code) Descnption of Protect Zt.' -.•/ s/ ..J fit / iZ sue./ may 1en "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and bebef, to be true and correct 1 further certify I will comply wiz the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner 4 r Z� `4•��r. Representative ..' Mailing Address ►s a- v\ "SV Mailing Address (<sa. C)' s} City - State - Zip S\- , z City - State - Zip .\\'" ti -sTo �s Telephone No Le s k - LI 3 4 - R CQ s to (Signature Is required) Lot Size (dimensions) h'9x /tor Land Area / 7, 4/73 s1. Height of Buildings Stories Feet Pnncipal / 1/z I T No so tfr Accessory i I y) s6 ft SITE AND PROJECT Telephone No Ce S' I - << 31'- _ [o' u Signature (Signature Is required) DESCRIPTION �� Total Building floor areaKo.t. re feet Existin , >g 3 quare feet Proposed 11.1 square feet Paved Impervious Area /G as square feet No of off-street parking spaces 3 H \mcnamara\sheila\pLANAPp FRM May 1, 2003 Attached for your approval are plans for the remodeling project of our home which is located at the corner of Brick St and W Olive St. The original house was built in the 1890's Since then, a back porch was removed and a deck added by a previous owner Another owner then added the existing addition as a three season porch We enclosed the structure as a year round addition However, the foundation under this section is post set in cement for the deck. Our remodeling project will include the addition of a foundation built in compliance with the local building codes to alleviate structural problems currently experienced and serve as the foundation for our new addition The current addition and decking (to the South of the home) will be removed and replaced with the new addition and deck. The existing addition is 10' x 24' or 240 sq ft single level The new addition will be 18' x 24 or 432 sq ft and will be 1 '/% stories During this project, the kitchen and bath on the main floor will be remodeled as well as adding an additional bathroom to the second floor The current structure is approx 8' off the property line to the West which will be the setback for the new structure as well 5 0 43 • �y we w re 0) U_ m 2 H 60 50 15 . WEST 51 11 8 f saos 2 12 50 3 0 13 • 50 15 10 9 O 2 R • 8 7 2 so 6 5 14 m 0 5 50 25 7 6 O a 50 30 25 17 18 a 3 O 2 0 • 25 r.r ✓4. r ]9 20 a 9 0 m RAMSEY 21 22 9 9 • 23 STREET 5 • • • 50 • • 54 • so • 50 • 0061> as 90 • 90 O TO 0 STREET CSA R 0 ES 50 w w re 0) A 6 I 5 '• 52 7 8 • 3 2 I 1 8 ✓.r l'IcKINST 2Y 52 52 45 , f 14 9 10 5i • 2 Ak SSTREET w w D_ cn - 8 • 9 75 04 29 8 9 • 10 11 12 13 • 2 • 1 • so 4 s9 00 • 5 9995 13 6 • 99 95 00 9994 U SO 0 • m 1 m 3 2 m 2 • 94 3 • 9 9• 10 • 9 I 10 11 4 O 92 m 50 60 w w re en STREET BY 5 K 4 SEE.L 7 —7 m 0 VAC D WEST OAKIS1 0 m 12 • "' 11 10 • 9 0 —6, E SO 5L BOOK V BONDS. P WEST PINE STREET 99 95 0 8 Location Map W 2 0 9a12 T 50 9994 1 0 00 3 04 05 50 AREA OT OE ®PD 3 2 1 B 79 64 11 502 1 6 2 79 50 m O 1n R I\5 RZOW RI9W R T R10 RW Vicinity Map C 0 168 Scale in Feet rmO d card c. Moor Mrw.W s s vfMTa/ Nola ricedit Ma Pdr, 90▪ 0�. W. Cars s...w e 5 • asi wow on MAIM *mom uvour Wombs, 3.1 ECG MMso v..Jam,a taw J 1 R_IW R2OW RI9W R._W R_IW ROW Vicinity Map 0 40 I Scale in Feet '1 LIIs guy C7 2 a0 i 6>5 VI z Location Map $1000 ..�2�tprx1, 1 ec i u F` 6T .r.. Y'e x E" 31 i ' v Tz �", ::5 J �. f 47;7 IA b`, F e cL 'Y..sG.'-v tea- t7f„a. :c-S� �Lrk tom'✓ 4 •] �r "-' - -! `t ` 'G S 1 .F c-r St .� - .y' + y,, xoh at :ram .�' i" r _S .r'• '^� F. ` f-r, a.,, •,�"-� '; ±C i F � di e `�' �ra"',t^� a, s •, iY�^Y ys ' P � -,3.' as -I, s aL x 4 u a yFi < Ty N4�� T,ie..r !'�2 a r �: d >Fy te. ,i,_ . �.: F r ., s S to a >+ _ s ti 4 • vs,. '-e r 4 a '-a,�du i ,;. „ i ". h -f -4.;* F t 1 �Y �4. �71�. y� r .µ'di WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT SURVEY AND LAND MANAGEMENT DMSION 1494962TdShi#N th,POBOxI Motet PAnnesca 55002-0006 (651) 430-6875 �irtm LEGEND DNR PROTECTED WATERS DNR PROTECTED WETLAND DNR PROTECTED WATERCOURSE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PARK BOUNDARY NORTH SCALE 1 mch = 50 feet xs-k�.„t } i taw CaDlrY WNW MAP * LOCATION OF TINSWP SECTION %AMI YMAP PROPERTY IOBf16iiV CINMOB FOMMT(GFDCON) BrCIOI TOMOW ma GLOATER SQL SUM IMO M EER SPRIER PAWL #f Ri I/ (OOpM) UST an omen RO9RP= 4 a ,yam )y THIS DRAWWG S THE RESULT OF A COMPIATION AND REPRODUCTION OF LAND RECORDS AS THEY APPEAR IN VARIOUS WASHNGTCN COUNTY OFFICES WASHINGTON COUNTY S NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INACCURACIES PROPERTY LINES AS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES AND MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL LOCATIONS MAP LAST UPDATED ARrgus131200.3 NO ADDRTONAL CHANGES NAVE BEEN REPORTED TO DATE DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY 442000 FiNlS lEi° PrPC -!WA-'Y M0 W00D 7- FL&X, Pt,4,'V scALE //y" = /'-0 36 Lx/s 77,V cc) NEW toANT-2.U(77DN Q-7 7/LL FGOOK iY-W 77Le fGOOIL 77iP0O611 kiTCY/EN DW RE/N01/- Ex/Sr/A/G ExoloUfr e&r WINDOII - AIMZµ )xisnNe WALL E,114 T /11/� UT / ITG/l#/V fvg. Dowv cE/uNo io M4TCh NEW RgF i1/ / IMA/S7F(/CT/0/V .4) • G8GND Xf47/Nl(q WfrUGS ,V W W1105 Z Vf /lo"D G, MW Err WAILS ZX(o /(o "D. G. — — — Er/ S ri ve 7o //1aclt D — sMic7ugAG BfAM /a4/6Ptx r 7V f0L1NIMMAJ Oft 6/2Dt e BEimi f /V L /VGPV (--(//V r ' • • 1 .. .da /q, t vt-g-/FY I � � I yr1 1 j �FYuun- MI1Z-N EX/SI/A/6 /200P S YS /N 7 /S /M/1649/4M A L o#-D BAA-2. 2-3— A/6 YVA- sl XISr/AM co V 7 i L Q e4 tZ tkk qk-$ isnz LEC�E,f/,D E,//ST/A/b WALLS NEW Gt//7GL 5 ZX1/ /& "O.C- ��NEN/ ,Txr WA/,LS 2A, /("OG - t1/5r/i1/6 )11/1-1-1S TO Be oeetrov6D S MRm L 13E,�4.. k/u/ocs r -ro FOUAIO pi? te.4 YY! N\° c so kk 4c„1 k 4/0—, ,,h/l -97v-75 A' ' c' /V OLL6.4 C /I o/ snonN/JJYQ JI 4 4 02 '4/)9 7 7/v02,,2/ 54a7 i — Ude )Na) (iX gh x gh • • • • ,¢ODmolJ PpUgvk71oN ��- ,r� _51/5tarx1 2 b eT vi /S_Z! �l' OL(vE 51- Sr��Lw k-r_, NI nl Ktvf5tD 1 ECgori3OE 2003 f f� //°/1=//A// -7-k+;5 NOLLf1A 373 //1,005- NOU- ?07 Aill4A — Smo4NJM 9N1151 X 3 '71 LL.YN1'2Y • C 51J iiO A' 7/JYG 1 I — 0 7 i I YsK I FY UNIT MJD IAca-non' IVVU CONS7R.UCT1LN / It-ST ELEVATION - SCALE l/y"= / '- 0"1 A-001771W t kw-A/DV1177Di/ FrigICV21/ E 5 USA-M ,'oErtilAlV' /521 W O1 /VE ST S-r'7LLW/ TEY NIA( // J /L % Z 003 6S/l/ PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB-F/04-08 Planning Commission Date February 9, 2004 Project Location Liberty Village/New England Place Comprehensive Plan District Village Commercial Zoning District VC Applicants Name Contractor Property Developers Type of Application Final resubdivision of Lots 2 and 3, Blk 1, Liberty Village Project Description The request is to combine two Tots into one lot (one owner has purchased the two Tots) Utility easements and zoning regulations will not change Recommendation Approval Attachments Application form and plans RN-20-2004 10 52 CPDC Of LVVY CJJ Jl IJJL`.JUU J.V ar ..r J. 11—a—rr1 La, 651 P 02/03 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 •Case No W D8 Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED SpeciaWCOnditionai Use Permit Variance 12Resubdiws►on Subdivision* mprehensive Plan Amendment* ____Co Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees of ell forms and supporting material The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy photos, sketches, etc j submitted In connection with any application All supporting material (i e , p copies fc of the City of StrlIwateT Si t,, en (113) (12)oes of of submitted with application becomes the propertyliC9bon supporting matenal is required. if application is submitted to the City Any incomplete cop supporting material is required. A site plan is required with app supping material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION N� (iVJ'P Address of Protect Zoning District J C Descnption of Project r. rtwo ► C.,sJe,\_ Assessor's Parcel No L.T--11=F�rt-1 - J (GEO Code) "1 hereby state ibe foregoing statements and all data, informatinformation and�� 1ct evidence sr ubmitted certify I will oherewith I respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and the permit if it is granted and used ' Property Owner Cor.l:'nAeav (- Woe_ x s.x9 Mailing Address3t>L' L Pcr0 City - State - ZipPosG r , /AA SSI1 S Telephone No Co S ( - U(, - `f -7,-- — Signature 1A (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area rJ I square fet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces, Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area '1z,"; co 4 Height of BuildnlgS Stories Pnnapal Accessory _ _ _ Feet Representative E Mailing Address_.... City - Tele i r Ar c UBEeTy bN AEU b3[tDI • �+a A STII uAI 75TH STREET NORIN LIBERTY ON THE LAKE 6T11 A STILLWATER TOWNSHIP Location Map Vicinity Map Scale in Feet m. um l..l s a...= owl a2...�a.. :wi naa..o Ma he urs0 .i..o .n w.u.pa. Oa.., nit nsimnalft or an no* aa.a. Msumpn.Co..y ew.r.Ome. Row (SS iuOen Pnei a.. ea. 0 .9.a0 Nomme . o2023 Yap +a a ma PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/04-09 Planning Commission Date February 9, 2004 Project Location 1931 Curve Crest Blvd Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Office Zoning District BP-0 Applicants Name Donna Tarras Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A Special Use Permit for a retail/takeout area, office area, kitchen production, storage and distribution space for Tasteful Thymes Company Discussion The request is for a Special Use Permit to operate a retail/takeout/kitchen production and distribution for the Tasteful Thymes Company The applicant is submitting two options for the business at different locations in the same building Option A shows a 3200 square foot space Option B shows a 3896 square foot area The applicant seeks approval of both spaces and will select one based on which one is available first Option A would have the most significant changes/additions to the building to accommodate Tasteful Thymes needs to operate efficiently A side glass main entrance and window would have to be installed Along, with a new side service door, and a back exit with stairs to ground level would also need to be constructed Materials for these changes would duplicate current windows and doors that are currently on the building The rest of the warehouse area would be divided with a firewall Tasteful Thymes Company area would be divided to accommodate a small retail area, an office, kitchen production, storage and distribution space Option B would require no alterations to the extenor of the building The retail space would have street frontage The retail space would have four tables accommodating 8 people Parking spaces for the two options are as follows 1 Option A — 5 spaces for the warehouse and 8 spaces for the retail area totaling 13 spaces 2 Option B — 3 spaces for the warehouse and 8 spaces for the retail area totaling 11 spaces The applicant will apply at a later date to the Heritage Preservation Commission if exterior signage is needed Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The applicant is to notify the Community Development Director which option is eventually chosen 2 All extenor alterations to the building shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 3 Signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 4 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry matenal, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the main building Findings The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan — Option A and Option B/Building Photo 01/23/2004 15 12 6513511945 01/23/2004 09 15 6514 - 910 TASTEFUL THYMES CITY OF STILLWP PAGE 08 PAGE 01 /PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 218 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWA1 R MN 53082 Case No. 50P Date Fled Fee Paid Ftaceipt ACTION REQUESTED Specgal/CondibonaJ Use Permit , Vanance _ R subdnnsion Subdn�ision* Comprehensive Plan Amendnnenr _,Zoning tent* _Planning Unit Development * ,_,Certrficate of Compliance The fees fbr requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the cow of attorney and engineering fees. The applicant rS responsible for the camrRp/atone s and accuracy of all forms end supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Ail supporting material (i a., photos, sketches, etcj submitted with application becomes ties proper& of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (18j copies of supporting material is required if application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting maternal is required MOW plan is required whit applications Any Incomplete application or aupporb►eg material will delay the application process. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project OW (Fete (k s7` Zoning tit g P—r) Description of erect Assessors Parcel Noaoa0WW/ (GEO Code) 'I hereby stab the foregoing statements and all data, infotereatron and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and ballet, to ba frue end correct 1 further certify l will comply wItt the permit if It is granted and used" Propel Owner l -e4 mire Re Mafing Mdress_ ,q4' , Mailing Address ) ( /6/ City - State - Zip �.¢u h ,f -l/% City - State - 4p Telephone No. 4,5/ 017' - 75' o g/ .4r Telephone Pld 6;4'i: 3t/ Signature..._. - Signature I/ �� ,�.►� 7 e 5 (Signature Ia requited) i~gnatumm Is required) Lot Ske (dimensions) _ x Lend Area_ Height of Buildings Stories AccessoryPrincipal sITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Bdsting square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feat No of off-street perking spaces _ Feet Ht May 1, 2003 m 1 0 30 • O to o Nwe a vows �� DOC m 00 STILLWATER T DIWNAGE a PDXDING EASEA£M DOC 30253 0 5 • a w02 9 Niiiiiitilig, „\t_ 1 yti 230 12 • ssm 2 KERN-PAULEY 11 • nm 10 • am • • TOWER DRIVE a 1 • —m-- mm 2 • nm mm loom mm m a • 0 r r- ....„. • • Location Map o I 0 189 Scale in Feet crynplauan �_ �_�as ry ryas Oov▪ a o Ouna _� Wrangel Caul, nmacoutry ea any naonanooa Saws w_0., .s n� W ry m_ bin 203. 01/23/2004 15 12 6513511945 TASTEFUL THYMES PAGE 02 January 23, 2004 TO City of Stillwater City Hall North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 FROM Tasteful Thymes Company 322 North Main Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-351-0993 SUBJECT Special Use Permit Application Property at 1931 Curve Crest, Stillwater, MN 55082 Tasteful Thymes Company currently leases in the North on Main Property at 322 North 1Vldin Street This property will be torn down for new development downtown and Tasteful Thymes Company must relocate The attached drawings have been created by Tasteful Thymes They are as close to accurate as possible but not accurate m perspective Please bear with us Tasteful Thymes Company has chosen to relocate to the warehouse space at the west and south section of the building at 1931 Curve Crest (behind the Gazette offices) Tasteful Thymes will take 3200 square feet of the 6300 square feet of warehouse space available Sec attachment #1 Additions/changes to the building exterior to accommodate Tasteful Thymes Company would mclude additions of a side glass main entrance and window, a side service door and a back exit with stairs to ground level Matenals used for these changes would duphcate current windows and doors on the building exterior See attachment #2 and #2a The existing warehouse space would be divided with a firewall Tasteful Thymes Company arca would be divided to accommodate a small retail area similar to current dimensions, an office area, kitchen production, storage and distribution space See attachment #3 Construction will be coordinated by Dan Register, local building contractor, and Tasteful Thymes Company We are currently working with the following companies in bidding process Steve McNally, plumbmg , Presage Sheet Metal- hoods and mare up air, Bruce Djock - refrigeration, Hoffman - HVAC, Lipner Electnc - electric If you have any questions, please contact Donna Tawas or Pam Karpesh at Tasteful Thymes Company, 651-351-0993 Thank you 0.41-0 ear W.0 10 130r 0/.104 COZY GIhL ern uar � 1Jn 13 1 r norobat r In+Jr M 170t A, J0147 lalsrietA mite LtL, la PC r. P -r LA7 GwP,a r-- 11.40 •AT Ca+uns to rslur caw IOIAO I11 41 I I� a et L!n I 1ieNOla/0 l�O cued. 't' -- -- -- --- sac -If --1- 11e t 1pd7 Ibtd ��ep4f Ind u v as friaittCh ;f►;„y ;pace 150,010.. 0 -0 T a+w^ar eI 10.0n 6.110 12 Pr fro rn rr ,a, raL _____ O—�f �4 C 70:31 7 11A I UT 0.al dlt ow acr uorsr M ClatuarmiTraiS Patted y CURVE CRE PROPERTIE 1901-1931 CURVE CRE 3l1L WATEF 1) Project 110 $1 211 Brovn1 By Clinched By Bute Ravi to 1 t !tern 1 Nam' nutty U.a this 0, newt w p kna4 by ""r sopa 44" oM 1 �+.lmed Q /ad lew Dale— Re9 SI ned ` t611s"FP /laud!P t Sheet Pale AU e t 4, ? IFJActpceepetSC(oIC w�4 fir tl bit. 1117 Lin rsM b O 10 001 CO »O 11 b,y 1C1 ctwuT b'4 ♦CT G/w1 nri CUR :liI;i!Id''lj; Y6?-fII1IW 11,1e WWIa J,116 OF rf1C&. 1sf- m L) 1 4A4IS4Y run 1 un I awn 5asc I u a.htet4 6tua l mtu 6041 qr III 0 i '.lii:kn 1 .7•.i:IIG "II'Lcnl6!Iil'i! IJlilihl!Ilni�d':diGii. �,,:;;{ll'1:7.4Yc''•".$ r 1 1 oppic 4 � lr t7 a-'M ober�p 1 IMA76 .0.ri4 lA1b I _OM 0 4' 4.41-13 eme. a 1 141t1UC6 unuII b o 101,01 Co 40ti1 r aodGr G.avr • CReer 01.14) L I 1.1n lup ----#Wattafh I veAw 143 - e-erAra auwor 1 TECH fPq c6 ?79. o SF W0.-0' 00 oar 00 d0,e1 me: I9esxcr uuc9 019 0( 0Y/ d67 Gr. olCa /cam sf aslal tb'l eQ a[� 091 1/ -0' LCI Ct7a- 1 la-0' 14 Yap sgNraa,Vk e C 1a7. turar 00 G7 0 0 4fi GAT ar'1?iq:n t ict v1/409.A- cpx;11,4�� i,vot, II a� Oleo G'rLe4 ;ALP 1¢ P7 a01)411ovcU Q 0203 [0741:E1 t, N' 11/ 1 ,r 'B otot 9-0 00X G1Rt47 1 rj't (tll c e 4-r I I'Rti Gr 1 totitratmuseEtst Project CURVE ORE PROPERTIE 1904-1931 CURVE ORE 871LLWATEr ritegmasaw_taes Plajeat t7o %1 211 kinutzzamsati Drown Chocked By Deto RCNe o le Rom Date R9- I ►hiuelF 1 "t 1 1 4 J a fit a t ii J ts- op rfl Memo 141441pr To Mayor and City Council From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date January 28, 2004 Subject Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council Regarding Recommendations in Boutwell Transportation Study Background For the past six months, the Planning Commission has worked with traffic consultants from SRF, Washington County Public Works Staff, MnDOT representatives and City of Stillwater Planning, Public Works and Police Department staff in developing a transportation plan for the Boutwell Study Area that addresses existing traffic conditions and provides for future growth As a result of the six month study, the traffic consultants prepared the enclosed Boutwell Area Traffic Study with short and long term recommendations regarding future improvements (enclosed) The Planning Commission held workshops on September 24, 2003 and October 13, 2003, to provide opportunity for study area residents input into the study On November 17, 2003, the Planning Commission held a public hearing from 7 p m to 10 45 p m on the transportation study recommendations -(the minutes of the meeting are attached) After the public hearing, the Planning Commission convened to two workshops on December 18, 2003 and January 22, 2004, to consider and discuss the public hearing comments along with the traffic consultants recommendations before taking a position on study recommendations Listed below are Planning Commission Boutwell Area Transportation Study recommendations The Planning Commission's consideration of the Neal Avenue extension and Deerpath improvement was difficult at best but the Commission felt direction and decisions should be made at this point so future traffic can be planned for, managed and improvements made to better accommodate traffic increases Planning Commission Boutwell Area Transportation Study Recommendation 1 Orient new Phase III expansion area development access to Manning Avenue by providing major project access from TH 96 rather than Neal Avenue .1 • 2 Designate Neal Avenue a collector street and connect Neal Avenue from Boutwell Road at the existing County Road 12 at Northland Avenue 3 Construct sidewalks along Neal Avenue from TH 96 to County Road 12 4 Manage access to Manning Avenue between Highway 36 and Highway 96 and actively support improvements that provide a high level of mobility on this important arterial facility 5 Work with Stillwater Township and the Bergmann Family to plan for and implement a north frontage road connection along Highway 36 between Manning Avenue and Stillwater Boulevard The frontage road should be implemented as soon as possible and be designed to a minimum of 35 MPH 6 Deerpath should be designated a collector and improved with sidewalks and possible traffic calming measures and street traffic enforcement 7 Sidewalks should be constructed along one side of Brick Street from CR 12 to Pine Street 8 Encourage Washington County to improve site distance and design of CR 5 west of Deerpath and construct sidewalk connection on est side of CR 5 from Deerpath to Fairmeadows 9 Deerpath should be designated as part of their Municipal State Aid System to enhance the funding options available to implement the improvements to Deerpath 10 Monitor traffic conditions on Maryknoll Drive/Oak Ridge Road, Northland Avenue/Croixwood Boulevard, Neal Avenue, Boutwell Road, Deerpath and Brick Street and consider traffic calming measures should the volume and speed of traffic on these roadways become a concern The Planning Commission feels traffic is a growing major concern in many city neighborhoods and that a coordinated city wide traffic management/calming program should be considered for development to better manage future traffic increases and protect neighborhoods Recommendation Consideration of Boutwell Area Traffic Study Recommendations Attachments Boutwell Area Traffic Study, minutes CPC 11/17/03 Memo To Planning Commission From Sheila McNamara, Community Development Department Date February 6, 2004 Subject Downtown Streetscape Enhancement Study Attached is the proposal from Lane Design Group for the streetscape study These booklets are for you review and Steve will be collecting them at the end of your meeting on February 8, 2004 City of Stillwater Building Inspection Department CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1900 TOWER DR 3203020430005 KERN-PAULEY ADD Block 002 Lot 012 STILLWATER WEST LLC, KENNEDY RAY 1200 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER, MN 55082 a a Lane Design Group Inc 135 Lost Lake Court Mahtomedi Minnesota 55115 1866 651 653 3839 tel 651 429 0689 fax Mr Steve Russell Director of Community Development City of Stillwater Minnesota 216 N Fourth Street Stillwater Minnesota 55082 Mr Russell Thank you for contacting Lane Design Group Inc regarding a streetscape study for the City of Stillwater January 5 2003 We have prepared this proposal for design services with a multidisaplinary team approach which we believe is most beneficial to the study and design of Stillwater's unique and growing downtown streetscape environment Our team has worked together on vanous projects and many in the Stillwater area We look forward to being a part of Stillwater's constant attention to historical character design retail development and environmental improvement Although we as a team represent a broad design and analysis capability we believe that interaction and participation by you and your assoaates the advisory committee and the entire community will play a very important role in both the analysis and design phases of the project Thank you for this opportunity to present our thinking design approach and our team to you If you have any questions regarding this proposal please call me Sincerely v s \ Robert J Lane Principal www lanedesigngroup com a SJ1 liwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA City of Stillwater, Minnesota Department of Community Development Downtown Stir'eetscape Enhancement Study A Proposal For Design Services January 5, 2004 by Lane Design Group, Inc. 135 Lost Lake Court Mahtomedi, Minnesota 55115 651 653-3839 651 429-0689 fax www.lanedesigngroup.com Lane Design Group, Inc. has been requested to prepare an outline of tasks and related costs for preparing a study of Downtown Stillwater to include Main Street and adjacent two block strip either side of Main Street from the Northern to Southern limits of the business district, an area that is, for the most part, within the Downtown Historic District and subject to the City's special development criteria and guidelines for the area. Prior to this recent request LDG was charged with developing sign standards for the municipal parking facilities including 13 surface lots, and a Municipal Signing and Wayfinding Study for Stillwater. These studies are currently ongoing and will be integrated into this proposed Streetscape Improvement Study. This Downtown Streetscape and Improvement Study will include all aspects of the streetscape in the interest of creating more appealing, user friendly and appropriate solutions to the vehicular/pedestrian environment of the Downtown Commercial District. Paramount to the study is the recognition of the City's and the Study Area's character and heritage. Any program to study and recommend streetscape improvements must preserve this character and address the variety of environmental conditions and needs that exist and are planned for the future. The study will present design concepts to enhance the "Stillwater experience" both visually and functionally, for visitors and residents alike. The design tasks will first focus on the evaluation of the existing streetscape and then present opportunities for improvement. Based on the analysis of the existing conditions, the study will develop a model scenario for improvement that will focus on both specific and comprehensive streetscape issues. The recommendations will focus on appropriate refinements and solutions to fit future growth and change. It will consider the use of physical spaces, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, street furniture, public art and theme graphics, wayfinding and signage needs, landscaping elements, architectural refinements, historical identity, special event and interactive opportunities. These recommendations will be presented in a series of sketches and virtual design imagery, where appropriate, to demonstrate before and after comparisons of the design concepts. The work will require the participation of the community, its municipal representatives, commercial and retail interests and an experienced design staff. In addition to our experience in environmental graphics, experiential theme studies and thematic street furniture design, we are proposing the addition of a small group of collaborative designers and consultants to help us better explore and resolve the streetscape improvement issues. Our "team" will provide the interdisciplinary expertise in street graphics and wayfinding, architectural and historical integrity, landscape design, and retail marketing considerations, needed to conduct the Study and prepare conceptual design recommendations. The end result will be an enhanced Downtown Commercial District streetscape environment that is unified, functional and appropriate, as well as one that reaffirms the City's vision - its identity, its pride and its heritage for years to come. The Downtown Commercial District will be the primary focus of the study and include the area bounded on the North by East Elm Street and the South by 600 South Main. The East boundary will be the St. Croix River and the West boundary will be 2nd Street. Where recommendations appear to be applicable to areas outside the study area they will be so noted. Proposed Study Area A proposal for streetscape improvement design for the City of Stillwater, Minnesota page 2 Lane Design Group, Inc. Scope of the Stu In conjunction with current sign studies for parking and overall City points of interest identification, the Streetscape Study will consider all variables that contribute to the street environment as well as opportunities that can help improve the character and function of these pedestrian/vehicular spaces in the Downtown Commercial District. The environmental elements to be considered include such things as street signs and graphics, information displays - both permanent and temporary, architectural facades and details, landscaping, lighting and street furniture elements. Additionally, the study will consider requests and opportunities for sidewalk cafes and criteria that might facilitate their expansion within the Downtown Commercial District. A study of existing conditions in this downtown district will include the understanding of various codes, policies and plans that contribute to those conditions. Often existing conditions are a direct or indirect result of those guidelines and practices whether they are intentional or not. By understanding the intention of the various plans, criteria and practices, the analysis and recommendation work will be based on realistic goals that consider all the influences that impact elements of the streetscape. Considerations will include such criteria as MDOT sign standards, Historic District design guidelines, Commercial and Municipal Building Codes, the Downtown Plan and the new Plan Update, the new Flood Protection Plan, Municipal Parking Code, new municipal parking plans, proposed commercial developments, snow removal practice and policy, special event practices and policies, and other criteria of that may be influential and relevant. While the professional design services of our team will ultimately provide detailed recommendations for an improved streetscape for Stillwater's Downtown Commercial District, the design product will carefully consider and reflect the interests, needs and experience of the commercial, residential and municipal stakeholders within the study area. Their representation can be through elected officials of the City, blue ribbon committees formed specifically to interact in the design process, or focus groups assembled to provide early input and involvement. Our fees will vary depending on the preferred process. -1j rn,{�•al Rnfnrrrv,;'- Stillwater, Minnesota has developed a strong reputation for maintaining a unique shopping, and even tourist -attracting, image or identity. While other cities have given in to the many vehicular and commercial demands and changed according to various developmental influences that replace historical environments and infrastructure, Stillwater has recognized and largely preserved its original character - its esthetic heritage. This is obvious in many parts of the City including the downtown commercial area (where demands are often most influential). This attention to detail and character has contributed greatly to the success of retail and commercial business, and the City's appeal. It has also provided a unique and pleasurable experience to visitors and a sense of pride to its residents. Significant considerations in the design and evaluation process will be improvements that enhance Stiliwater's historic character, the user's experience and the vitality of the Downtown Study Area. Proposed Study Area Focus Visualization Area - - Future Planning Considerations: 1 Downtown Plan Update 2 Lowell Park Improvements 3 Flood Wall Development 4 Proposed Park 8 Museum 5 Residential/Retail Development 6 Residential Development 7 Stillwater Bridge Renovation 8 Aiple Property Park Plan 9 Residential/Retail Development i of uo C n' ILCC CGfaSJII.!IIIV: 1• t . 1iS r roo7 Mig ET .4' iciraga- Composite photo elevation - Mulberry to Laurel, on Main, looking West A proposal for streetscape improvement design for the City of Stillwater, Minnesota page 3 Lane Design Group, Inc. Defining Today, while the impression and identity of the City and it's commercial district are positive, there are constant demands related to growth and development that will (as in all communities) tend to alter the appearance and impression of the City and its downtown. There are also varying needs of retailers, their customers, and even residents that can be considered, which are needed today - and will be applicable to future growth. This study will not only focus on needs and deficiencies, and how to resolve them, but it will define the opportunities and refinements that will keep the commercial district unique, authentic, and enjoyable - by visitors and residents through its present and future development. Orientation and Analysis The process for developing streetscape concepts and refinements for the Downtown Commercial District will involve a thorough review, block by block, of the range of existing conditions along the public right of ways, sidewalks and open spaces to understand their attributes, needs and opportunities. The design team will gather, from the City, input regarding improvement issues, requests and considerations, as well as any planned developments that will impact streetscape character, circulation and user needs. These considerations, attributes, improvement opportunities, and needs, will become the basis for design of the streetscape concepts. At the conclusion of this first phase of work, a clear statement of design objectives, regarding street graphics, landscaping, architecture, circulation, retail interests and any other influential factors, will be defined and presented for review. Concept Development The design team will carefully prepare concepts and improvement alternatives as needed to meet the design objectives. Key to the development of design concepts will be an understanding of the unique, historical and experiential qualities that must be preserved while improving the visual and functional street and walkway environments. The concepts will be presented in sketches and computer renderings including typical applications within the study area. They will further be defined by type, typical use/location, and cost/funding implications. Concepts regarding phasing and implementation priorities will be discussed and presented at the conclusion of this phase. Design Application To further study and demonstrate the streetscape concepts, we are proposing to present the concepts as they would appear if applied to a specific, focused area within the study area. The focus visualization area (shown on page 3) 360'composite photo elevation - Nelson and Water Street intersection "Virtual design" elevation - City Market, Kansas City, Missouri A proposal for streetscape improvement design for the City of Stillwater, Minnesota page 4 Lane Design Group, Inc. contains a mix of use, and physical characteristics that would test and validate the proposed design concepts. The focus area would be presented with before and after "virtual design" techniques using photographic imagery with embedded improvements. Areas that include planned development changes will be as well presented in renderings to show the integration of the design concepts with these planned future environments. This application process will further demonstrate the appropriateness, effectiveness, and value of the design concepts and help insure a seamless integration of streetscape elements as the Downtown Commercial District develops in the future. Additional Studies and Involvement The estimated fees shown are based on our understanding of the required tasks and scope. Our team is always be open to suggestions, requests and additional studies, presentations and involvement as may be beneficial to City of Stillwater. If changes are required during the design contract work, we will provide scope and fee estimate revisions accordingly. Our team has the expertise and ability to carry the design concepts to final design and bid documents, in phases or portions, as may be needed for implementing the Streetscape Improvement Program. We are committed to insuring the involvement of the same design team members, as may be needed, throughout this implementation process. Thr: We are proposing a multi -disciplinary approach with a team of designers and consultants with individual responsibilities that are combined to provide a holistic review of and recommendations for the Study Area. Environmental graphics and wayfinding review and concept development will include, but are not limited to, such elements as: Overall image and identity, pedestrian and vehicular direction and information, thematic imagery and art display, special event and decorative banner usage and retail marketing display, within the Study Area. Landscape review and concept development will include but are not limited to such elements as: Street trees, plantings and landscape buffering elements, thematic landscape design, decorative and pedestrian lighting, curbline alterations, and pavement materials and finishes, within the Study Area. 180°composite photo elevation - Public parking Tots, looking North to Chestnut Architectural review and concept development will include but are not limited to such elements as: Architectural detailing, facade refinement, public amenities, and space utilization / refinement to better serve commercial, retail, residential and public interests, within the Study Area. Street furniture elements will be reviewed and conceptually developed as a coordinated graphics, landscape and architectural effort. Retail environment review will include considerations for retail needs, opportunities and trends as well as the integration of experiential factors and streetscape amenities that contribute to successful retail destinations. Particular attention will be given to the uniqueness of Stillwater's retail experience and how streetscape improvements can best preserve and enhance it. Historical context and background considerations will be addressed throughout the review, analysis and concept development to insure appropriate and relevant design within the Study Area. The team members are: - Bob Lane, Lane Design Group, Inc., Mahtomedi, MN - Dewey Thorbeck, FAIA, Thorbeck Architects, Minneapolis, MN - Sandy Stein, Stein Trending.Branding.Design LLC, Minneapolis, MN - John Lauber, Minneapolis, MN - John Larson, ASLA, SRF Consulting, Minneapolis, MN See attached firm and individual profiles and related experience. Anticipated Design Fees Environmental Graphics Consultant, Team Leader Architectural Consultant Retail, Trend 8 Marketing Consultant Historic Preservation Planner Landscape Consultant Fees and other expenses for the Review, Analysis, Design and Visualization of the Enhancement Study are anticipated to be total $69,710 which include $59,810 for design fees, $4,300 for web site link (optional) and publishing and $5,600 for printing, presentation materials and other project related expenses. These anticipated costs include a specific time allocation for presentations and reviews including two four-hour community reviews during the analysis and the concept development phases. Fees and expenses may be increased if needed to accommodate any additional presentations that may be requested by the City. The fees will be billed for time expended and will not exceed the anticipated $65,410 amount unless additional studies, reports, or design scopes are requested by the City. Project Deliverables All meeting notes, background studies, reports will be periodically documented for the City's use. Design concepts will be prepared in presentation board format (30" x 40") and in hand-out form (11" x 17") for the City's record and use. One set of presentation boards, and 14 sets of handouts will be provided at presentations. Additional printing of the handouts will be billed as additional expenses to the amount shown above, as requested and approved by the City. A final review and summary document will be provided in14 sets as well as digital pdf format for additional reproduction by the City. A proposal for streetscape improvement design for the City of Stillwater Minnesota page 5 Lane Design Group, Inc. ocshz" cTask Descriptions Schedule in weeks) c .*.Qg" Zia1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 City of Stillwater Minnesota January 5, 2004 Downtown Streetscape Enhancement Study Hrs 72 18 30 42 18 12 I Orientation and Analysis • • • • • • • • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • l • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A Identify the image and esthetic goals of City planners and representatives — r T - 1 T 1 B Review current downtown design cntena for signs sidewalks and storefronts - r I _ L_ _ L _ I C Identify and discuss client concems with existing streetscape -= r r 1 r D Identify commercial owner/tenant issues that should be addressed by the study r- r E Identify municipal issues and future plans that should be considered by the study — - F Review historical context of the study area - — - - r r- L r G Survey/inventory existing and planned conditions of the study area and _ r — r r L -L r I - identify and describe general streetscape needs deficiencies and opportunities relevant to r -r- r j I - r - 1 0verall Identity and Image - r-- L = - - L 2 User Experiential Issues 1 r r r 3 Architectural Integrity and Facades 1 r _ r L 4 Environmental Graphics Orientation and Wayfinding 1 - r L 5 Landscaping Pavements and Public Utilities L 6 Street Furniture r - - T r - r - r .r -_ _ 7 Vehicular and Pedestnan Circulation f T T r r �- H Document and organize findings issues and identify design objectives r - r - 1 T- IIM=IMMINSOL1 I Review with Client and Advisory Committee followed by Community presentation (4hr) r , -L L _ r - - I _ r r _J r - r - - r r L L L 1 - ] L L r Hrs 102 34 36 40 10 6 II Streetscape Concept Development • • • • A Illustrate and descnbe recommendations related to observed and anticipated streetscape needs deficiencies and opportunities as defined in task I G above • • • • • • B Organize and team review determine hierarchies of needs and recommendations • • • • C Identrfy costs and funding implications of recommendations • • • • • • D Prepare visual presentation of recommendations and team review • • • • • • • E Review with Client and Advisory Committee (additional presentations to be determined) • • F Amend edit as needed and publish r _ --r T 1 _ L_ - T r - Hrs 154 56 20 24 10 10 III Design Application to Focus Area • • A Prepare composite base imagery of the focus area elevations perspectives and detail • • • • • B Review base imagery views with team and Client amend as needed • • C Prepare before and after simulations of recommendations using approved base imagery • • D Prepare plan reference drawings and suggest implementation sequence • • • • • • E Team review and revisions • • • F Prepare cost and implementation summary and recommendations • • • • • • G Present to Client and Advisory Committee followed by Community presentation (4hr) • • • • • • • H Prepare summary review booklet to document the project recommendations and studies Hrs 328 108 86 106 38 28 Totals Phase I II b III L T T _r r -17 Nemom Fee '� o' � r...)O .A It N ..4 Co oo -co V O O OW O co NO cm O Fee Total $59,810 Expenses 5 600 Web Site Option 4,300 Total $69 710 IV Study Implementation (scope to be determined) A Guidelines and/or code preparation and approvals (scope to be determined) B Final design and bid packages (scope to be determined) C Implementation/installation progress reviews (scope to be determined) 11 A proposal for streetscape improvement design for the City of Stillwater Minnesota Lane Design Group Inc Web Site Link (Optional) In addition to presentations to the City and the Community during the project a Zink can be established from the City's web site to a project web site The project web site would include an introduction and overview of the project including a description of the process scheduled duration and key meeting dates of public interest As the project develops the findings recommendations and visual presentations would be posted for review and comment by the public Public feedback would be organized and distributed to the City and team members for consideration The web site would provide access to project information that could be reviewed or downloaded at will and provide input from the interested public that could be gathered outside of public meetings It would not however provide a discussion forum The information to be published to the web site would be subject to the Citys review and approval Additional fees associated with creating and maintaining the web site would be billed on an hourly rate of $50 00 per hour and are estimated to be $4 300 Lane Design Group's webmaster could create the Zink to a discrete project page on our web site or could upload the files to a discrete page on the CitVs web site Either approach should not require additional web hosting costs Project Duration We anticipate the time required to complete the Streetscape Enhancement Study to be approximately 24 weeks but may increase depending on scheduling of reviews and approvals by the City Attachments Task Descriptions & Schedule with Fees Design Team Resumes and Related Experience A proposal for streetscape improvement design for the City of Stillwater Minnesota page 6 Lane Design Group Inc u Lane Design Group t a j y Wti tip} a QA. } 7 h r Q N a Diverse, Responsive, Professional From our associated offices in Minnesota, Colorado, Los Angeles and Chicago, we deliver a broad range of capability, experience and resources in visual communications using innovative design methodologies and technologies In today s economy design services must solve many different types of problems in cost effective ways and often in a very timely manner Through small and medium size offices with reasonable overheads we are able to extend our services to a broad audience in a very responsible and responsive manner resulting in superior design products that meet the time and budget demands of our clients Our design management staff has over 40 years combined experience in corporate identity and brand development, product promotion, environmental graphics and exhibit design We have developed innovative solutions to problems in many industries including medical, financial, food, entertainment, hospitality, transportation and e comerce We bring clear thinking, great ideas and experienced project management together to get the job done Lane Design Group, Inc Combining management, design and production through regional offices, Lane Design Group provides a broad scope of experience and design disciplines with current and expanding technologies to meet the broad and dynamic needs of comprehensive graphics programs co Los Angeles April Greiman Carolyn Glasser Freelance Assistant ♦AAA OD 000 444 Denver Steve Keller Ted Zorich Freelance Assistant ♦♦A♦ 00 00 s y n e r g �y - Saint Paul Bob Lane O Eric Swenson CAD Assistant ♦♦,_.A♦♦ 00 , 00 o Chicago Bill Bohnhoff Audrey Daras AA 00000 Tasking Disciplines A Project Management 0 Environmental Graphics Design Management *Identity A Concept Development r MultiMedia A Design Development Q Package Design • Documentation 0 Web Publishing S CAD *Print key personnel Robert J Lane Principal Bob is a Principil ind design duLctoi it Lane. Design Group Inc and responsible for design and project management of environmental graphics programs in the Saint Paul office His design expenencc' includes coipoiatr identity corporate communications product promotion package design exhibit de ign and environmental graphi"s His work involve'- do ign and project management with c'lents that iangc from corporate executives to municipal department head, to small business owners and he often directs the graphic design component for large interdimciphnary design projects Bob s expel ience include envuonmentil graphic, marketing design corporate communications and exhibit design with a broad range of Fortune 500 companies and has directed design programs for the municip dittes of Chicago Illinois Kansas City Missouri and Dade County Florida Following his graddation from the Kansas City Art Institute he joined InterDesign in Minneapolis as a graphic designer and went on to head the graphics department of CRS an architectural firm in Houston Texas He later became a founding partner of Keller Lane & Waln in Chicago where he worked on numerous print and environmentaI graphics programs including the comprehensive graphics standard, for Chicago 0 Hare International Airport Mr Lane was a founding membu and board member of the Society of Environmental Graphic Designers He his received iwaids for design excellence from American Corporate Identity and Piogressivc Architecture dad contributed to numerous award winning architectural projects LI key personnel Steve Keller Pi uiapil Steve has be en dcveloprng design and communication solutions for over 30 years After graduating from the Institute of Design in Chingo and completing graduate studies in Europe as a Fulbright Scholar he worked for Contain, r Corporation of America and the Center for Advanced Research and Design Steve also c stablithed a graphics and environmental design department for the architectural firm of C F Murphy & Associates HP was the founding partner of the Chicago based design firm of Keller Lane & Wain earlier know as The Graphics Group where he directed numerous print identity and environmental graphics programs for such c bents as Quaker Oals, Steelcase American Hospital Supply 0 Hare International Airport and thc J Edgar Hoover FBI Building He later joined Genesis in Denver as a partner and design director where he worked with Lane Design Group on several graphics programs including Arlington International Racecourse and Keystone Resort sign program He reu•nt work includes the de iqn and project manage n enl for the graphic program for the Pepsi Center in Deny( i Hiving rccc ntly rejoined Lan( Design Gioup Steve dircels design and develops marketing and environmental graphics from the Colorado based office in Colorado City He contributes significintly to the firms environmental graphic. exhibition design and multimedia capabilities In addition to iecognilion and award for his iorl• Mr Ke Iler Iris been invited to lecture to stucfentc his peels Ind prof sional issoci it on thc ,pecihcs of large interdrsapliniy p ojects p o r t f alto Elmhurst Art Museum Elmhurst Illinois Analysis Design of identity interior and exterior signs donor galley plaques for DeStefano+Partners Chicago AIA Chicago award I G 07-7 The City Market Kansas City Missouri Site analysis graphics master plan, tenant sign criteria theme graphics bid documents estimating for Piper Wind Architects & the City of Kansas City MO p o r t f olio Casino Graphics, Tunica Mississippi Kinder Louisiana Biloxi, Mississippi Design of venue identity wayfinding standards for various new construction and renovation programs for Grand Casinos Inc Minnetonka Minnesota and Park Place Entertainment Las Vegas Nevada portfolio In ! rr f " .ffi SIA � _ o 4kor_4 A yet eArAf tr" 9 t 't 1('• 2w a r to yer' / ,r..' �i,r` ! at - 3i 4. J7 .Le U`F � t`r11J • I 1+i1tNJs•�• �� 1 i g A .'.1Y ll ... I - --0 ) lr -.r t r7 1 r rr Zl iI vF 1 r Y Lt , 1 ,t r t LI II ILI f�, .- �� I .ra Its 1. i f r't 1 \'7, I ' ", r' " r — I t {I � 1 r 1 I f Jy' 1 L 1 Ali` l'T`�rf�S O�\ � J !�I I riJ i i � /(�'t. K V • t` 74. t It. r - yr Y,,i,w ? _ 1 d ( 4 / 1 VA. Sri � ♦ I •;♦ 'rR rl — r e J Icy t 1 rr+ `',J r ..4 TI„ a..1 4r Imaginarium The Children s Museum of Ft Meyers Identity, imaging exploration experiential event conceptualization facilities reclamation and master plan exploration for a commission to develop an entertainment and educational experience for the youth of Ft Meyers Florida cifs„k r 12 1 L 1. y 4 it 4 �'w * , i �, ;1 �� i �.� e . rTsff� J p or t f o l i o Soldier Field Chicago, IL Analysis, and design for rehabilitation of Chicago s landmark stadium including wayfinding and theme graphics in conjunction with Skidmore Owings Merrill who prepared construction documents for C F Murphy Associates Chicago IL 0 rlAf 'ffl`e/ 1 Pepsi Center Denver Colorado Image and identity development visioning design of wayfinding signage interactive displays and exhibits for Genesis Inc Denver CO p o r t f o l i o 1,\\,%cC 44, r MEM Keystone Resort Keystone Colorado Site analysis graphics master plan resort and villages identity retail sign criteria theme graphics and highway signs for Genesis Denver CO 1 thorbeck ARCHITECTS EDUCATION • Umversity of Minnesota, Bachelor of Architecture • Yale University Master of Architecture • Rome Prize Fellowship to the American Academy in Rome Italy PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Principal m charge of architectural design for all of the firm's work Project expenence includes • Punna Farms for Ralston Punna Company, St Louis, MO • Woodbury Indoor Central Park/Washmgton County Library, Woodbury MN • Agncultural Science and Industry Facility Penn State Umversity State College PA • Fort Snelling State Park Visitor Center, St. Paul, MN • Animal and Dairy & Foods Processing Center, Milton Hershey School Hershey, PA • Fontana Concert Society Performance Hall, Kalamazoo, MI • Sons of Norway International office renovation, Minneapolis, MN • International Wolf Center Ely MN • Agncultural Operations Management Center Umversity of Mmnesota/Crookston • Kiehle Hall Remodeling/Restoration, University of Mmnesota/Crookston • Studio Additions and Remodeling for Minneapolis College of Art & Design • St Paul Farmers' Market design studies Registered Architect m MN and number of other states NCARB Certificate COMMUNITY • Past President, Minnesota Society of the Amencan Institute of Architects • Past President of the Norwegian/Amencan Chamber of Commerce, Upper Midwest • Member of the Board of Torske Klubben • Member Lambda Alpha International TEACHING • Director, Center for Rural Design, and Adjunct Professor of Architecture, University of Minnesota, lectured nationally at universities and symposia, and served on a number of regional and national architectural award Junes DEWEY THORBECK, FAIA, FAAR ARCHITECT, PRINCIPAL PUBLICATIONS Progressive Architecture Architectural Record Architecture Minnesota Architecture d'Aujourd but France Idea Japan Art and Architecture Iran Aftenposten Norway Smithsonian Magazine Better Homes and Gardens House Beautiful American School Administrator's Journal Architecture Dairy Today Design and Environment Farm Journal HONORS • 2001 Good Neighbor Award from WCCO • 1994 Honor Award from AIA Minnesota for Agncultural Center at U ov M - Crookston • 1992 Graham Foundation Grant for book on Architecture for Agriculture • 1990 Cue Award from Minneapolis Committee on Urban Design for Fourth Precmct Station • 1989 Amencan Association of School Adm,mcirators and AIA Exhibition Award for River Falls High School • 1987 Interior Design Award from AIA Minnesota for Purina Farms, Gray Summit, Missoun • 1986 Honor Award from AIA Minnesota for Pura Farms, Gray Summit, Missoun • Elected as Fellow of the Amencan Institute of Architects, 1984 • 1979 Award from the Minnesota Society of Landscape Architects for Central Square Project m South St Paul • 1978 Honor Award from the Minnesota Society of Architects fo the Minnesota Zoological Garden • 1976 Award from Minnesota Society of Architects for Augsburg Park Library • 1975 Award from Design and Environment for the Minnesota Zoo • 1972 Design Award from Progressive Architecture for the Minnesota Zoo 1409 willow street minneapolis mn 65403 612 871 7979 fax 871 8088 thorbeck ARCHITECTS SELECTED EXAMPLES OF RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Anderson Center at Tower View Red Wmg, Minnesota On the National Register of Histonc Places the Anderson Center is a regional resource and histonc destmation for the convergence creation and mtegration of the arts sciences and the humanities A Master Plan has been prepared for the 330 acre property and a Barn Restoration Plan for the histonc 1916 barn as a year round multi use facility providing a perfonnance/banquet facility in the loft, and art gallery gift shop and cafe/bistro in the lower level A Studio Village consisting of five cottages will provide studio spaces for the Residency Program or be rented out as working studios to local artists II v fit i }r- r Kiehle Hall Addition and Renovation University of Mmnesota Crookston, Minnesota Built in 1910 Kiehle Hall is ehgible for mclusion on the National Register of Histonc Places The renovated buildmg will function as a community and campus venue for theater music, film, lectures and art exhibitions It will also provide a central location for campus technology systems The renovated building and addition will become a gateway for visitors alumni and students families with a more user friendly environment The $5 0 million project will be completed m 2002 thorbeck ARCHITECTS SELECTED EXAMPLES OF RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE A NEW STILLWATER PARK Stillwater MN The overall design of the Park is to have it relate to and connect with the unique arclutectural history and landscape character of Stillwater Most of Stillwatei's histonc buildings date from the Victonan era and one can see this m the histonc homes on the south hill as well as commercial buildmgs m the downtown area The Victorian style will predominate the appearance of the Park However the goal is to create a park that is attractive both because of its Victonan features and because it accommodates a large number of mterestmg educational entertaining and relaxing activities Brooklyn Park Historical Farm Brooklyn Park, Minnesota Usmg old photographs and vigorous research into construction methods and common building practices around the turn of the century this 1890s farmstead was stabilized, restored, and renovated Missing details were recreated and the structure restored from foundation to weathervane The Minnesota State Histonc Office has nominated the farm to the National Register of Historic Places. CoNsui.n c GROUP INC John A. Larson, ASLA Senior Associate Areas of Expertise Urban Design Site Planning and Design Land Use Impacts Public Involvement Urban Redevelopment Master Planning Registrations No 40709 - Landscape Arclutect (Minnesota) Landscape Architect (California) Education B L A University of Minnesota Affiliations Amencan Society of Landscape Architects Overview• Mr Larson has 23 years of expenence working on redevelopment, urban design, and parks and site master planning in Mmneapohs, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Indianapolis He has contributed to the creation of a number of significant urban open spaces, including many with important historical significance Mr Larson is skilled at communicating in an open, collaborative design process that includes residents, city officials and design professionals He has frequently collaborated with artists to infuse urban projects with uruque meaning and character Selected Project Expenence Stillwater Library Expansion Stillwater, Minnesota Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, Chanhassen Minnesota Hamet Island, Saint Paul Minnesota Riverfront Park Master Plan, Stillwater Minnesota Lakeville Art Center, Lakeville Minnesota Histonc Hamm Site Vision Plan Saint Paul Minnesota Avenue of the Arts, Mmneapolis Minnesota Frankfort Parkway Streetscape, St Michael Minnesota Hubert H Humphrey Terminal Site Plan Mmneapohs-Samt Paul International Airport, Minneapolis Minnesota Columbia Heights Downtown Plan Columbia Heights Minnesota Village Plaza Redevelopment Plan, Eagan Minnesota Sibley Street Streetscape, Saint Paul, Minnesota Nokomis East Streetscape Master Plan, Minneapolis Minnesota Eagan Streetscape Master Plan Eagan Minnesota Phalen West Redevelopment Plan, Saint Paul Minnesota Shoreview Commons Master Plan, Shoreview, Mmnesota Northside Jobs Park, Minneapolis, Minnesota Roosevelt Homes Public Housing Renovation, Saint Paul, Mmnesota University of Minnesota Archives Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota Anoka Ramsey Community College, Coon Rapids, Minnesota Amencan Express Financial Advisors, Minneapolis Minnesota Yerba Buena Gardens, San Francisco, California Plaza Las Fuentes, Pasadena, California Grand Hope Park, Los Angeles California Hope Street Promenade, Los Angeles, Califorrua White River Park Indianapolis, Indiana San Mateo County Health Center, San Mateo, Califorrua VA Medical Center, Palo Alto, Califorrua Ohio Veterans Plaza, Columbus, Ohio Fireman's Fund, Novato California SRF CONSULTING Cnour INC CLIENT City of Saint Paul SIBLEY STREET STREETSCAPE SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA The Sibley Street streetscape project from Warner Road to 5th Street provides a strong pedestrian connection between the Lower Landing promenade, where nver boats dock, and Mears Park in Saint Paul's historic Lowertown Distract The streetscape improvements are intended to encourage pedestrian movement up and down the sloping grade between Warner Road and 5th Street through a 200-foot-wide railroad overpass and across busy Warner Road As lead consultant to Saint Paul s Department of Public Works, SRF Consulting Group Inc coordmated the work of planners, engmeers and designers, including Shuler and Shook, lighting consultants, and Marjorie Pitz, landscape architect The final design includes an innovative nver flow' paving pattern of colored granite and glass chips that is accentuated by a colored hghting display mounted to the ceiling of the railroad overpass Street trees and streetlights sumlar to those used throughout the district add to the pedestrian experience, as do widened sidewalks at intersections, which shorten pedestrian crossing distances The Sibley Street streetscape project is funded in part by the Federal government through the TEA 21 program, supporting mtermodal transportation enhancements ri EAGAN STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN - Rgy EAGAN, MINNESOTA CONSULTING GHOUi iNE CLIENT City of Eagan SRF Consulting Group Inc assisted the City of Eagan in developing a thematic treatment for streetscapes in the downtown and other locations The project s goal is to unify the City's primary commercial districts enhancing the City s image Working with City staff and the Eagan City Council SRF developed a thematic style utilizing tuneless and classic design elements Streetscape features include • Intersection gateways that create a unified image at key intersections with the use of wrought iron fencing, brick and architectural concrete pillars, and colorful plantings • Street tree plantings • Custom street lighting • Planted medians on selected streets to create a parkway effect SRF developed implementation plans for approximately two miles of streetscape at two locations which are currently under construction eir II i rpl !' qil il,ii,plIIIl Il I In uuum ; I Illllill�ll:;all�;.II!Old11 ill?;ICI;II:I!II :. iiiiiilliiiiiiji,, SRF CONeucmG Gaour`livc Cum City of St Louis Park EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD STREETSCAPE PHASE III ST LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA The City of St Lotus Park retained SRF Consultmg Group Inc to provide a full range of planning, design and in -construction services for streetscape improvements for the segment of Excelsior Boulevard between Quentin Avenue and Monterey Avenue The project includes • Roadway narrowing and bump -outs at intersections to slow traffic and improve pedestrian safety • Transit plazas with landscaping identifying monuments and custom shelters • Expanded medians with landscaping banner poles and bollards • Concrete sidewalks with a decorative scoring patterns and concrete paver banding • New boulevard trees and ornamental street lighting • Imprinted bitummous crosswalks • New traffic signals The project has required extensive coordination with the City of St Louts Park Hennepin County Metro Transit and the developer of an adjacent property Significant public involvement has included open houses and individual meetings with each property owner along the corridor dunng the planning and design phases to seek input The project is currently under construction SRF M AIPLE PROPERTY AND KOLLINER PARK STILLWATER, MINNESOTA Ca SULTLNG CRO1WWe' da se, mU ZY VY/4 YY YQAIAa'a) ..wo u M~F o 2- MIMI I. Vt l ty"ter, I to l', 47rA * 1999 MASLA Award * Award of Merit for Public Planning MASLA CLIENT City of Stillwater a�NTrer.• mwamcmr..e. w 1 SN4 YJ4 Y4.5 CMK4ei low w Ru4 Ol b" nor 4/tlY AO s..lavfrsY+4-4 wnn s --MS t FOYow ✓. s. ar+ �.� tiw rr Y Y.a\ r-rYYf1Y.Y IM R `w a Miro ES a =4. OO, 4mYaeSu GYIRGSS rra .44 44 esurw41S- r T49- . T m p4Yq +aw4a ` +aA.iw.r1 4 VV. RGVV.J ALMA . `I*te L� rt 1+.. �'i S r 1/ �$ ��L'y"'o1 i .f�4M ��$ i�.t��`�.n,�$� .z'�F.�.'�'E�4?h�" �.''i\"�d@'�s The Aiple Property and Kolliner Park represent an outstanding opportunity for the City of Stillwater to expand its park and open space system, while creating a umque relationship between downtown and the Lower St Croix National Scenic Riverway These two sites offer differing opporturuties, but each will have a significant impact on the future of downtown Stillwater by preserving and enhancing its unique histoncal, natural and recreational environment SRF Consulting Group, Inc prepared phased master plans for the two sites, directing a design process that utilized local radio, newspapers and public open houses, and gathered input from numerous agencies responsible for development along the Lower St. Croix River Portion of the master plan for Aiple Property An artist s character image of proposed trad improvements The approved master plan for the Aiple property includes a 1 5-mile hiking loop, picruc shelters, wildlife viewing spots and historical markers describing important local rums A public dock provides nver access and serves as home to the Cayuga Barge which will be come a permanent exhibit describing the site's industrial past El CoNsu mw G¢oimiuc O z CLIENT City of Stillwater STILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY EXPANSION STILLWATER, MINNESOTA arm auseemei. ml1111lrle111yll SRF Consulting Group, Inc is currently developing site construction documents for the expansion of the hnstonc Stillwater Public Library The project integrates the Library expansion, on -site parking, stormwater management and a flexible use community plaza while respecting the historic setting and front elevations of the ongmal Carnegie Library building In collaboration with Miller Dunwiddie Architects, SRF developed the concept for a 50-car parking ramp and a 10,000-square-foot on -structure plaza to maximize the potential for use of the Library for community events and to generate revenue The plaza includes decorative plantings, fixed and flexible seating, and a trellis structure It boasts spectacular views of the St Croix River and will accommodate temporary tents and gatherings of 300 or more people John Lauber 3220 Edmund Boulevard / Minneapolis MN 55406 / 612 722 3922 / jlauber@mn rr com SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS I meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for work in history and architectural history I have more than 11 years of practical experience in preservation including fieldwork, research documentation planning and project implementation I have extensive knowledge of building materials systems and pathology I know the players and the places Since 1992 I have averaged 30-45 days each year on the road working directly with property owners built environment professionals and public officials in every corner of Minnesota and nearby states I am skilled at communicating through the wntten and spoken word and through pnnted and electronic media I have more than 25 years expenence in public relations advertising and marketing communications PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Histonc Preservation and Community Planning Consultant Minneapolis MN 2003 present I entered private practice in July 2003 specializing in reuse studies historical documentation and community based planning efforts intended to help people in small towns and rural areas find practical solutions to preservation issues affecting their communities Among other projects I am currently helping to develop a histonc context on Minnesota farming and famisteads for the Minnesota Department of Transportation and am documenting the histonc campuses of the Willmar and Fergus Falls Regional Treatment Centers for the Minnesota Department of Administration Minnesota Histoncal Society State Histonc Preservation Office St Paul MN 1996 2003 Education and Preservation Outreach Coordinator As the first and only incumbent in this position I was responsible for a wide vanety of activities intended to build awareness of and appreciation for Minnesota's histonc resources Dunng my tenure at the SHPO I provided education training and technical assistance to both preservation professionals and members of the general public Equipped with a small and often uncertain budget I achieved these goals through enthusiastic collaboration with property owners community groups public officials agencies and organizations in every comer of the state Planning Redevelopment and Technical Assistance Activities Managed and expanded the SHPO's Histonc Properties Reuse Study program to help communities find viable new uses for threatened histonc buildings Promoted preservation as a tool for economic revitalization through work with the National Main Street Center and the Minnesota Design Team Planned focus groups in eight Minnesota communities to help revise the Statewide Histonc Preservation Plan Participated in staff review of National Register nominations and grant applications Awareness Building, Public Education and Marketing Communications Activities Conceived publicized and produced a vanety of public events including Minnesota's annual Statewide Historic Preservation Conference the annual Histonc Preservation Week celebrations and the popular Archrtalks lecture senes Fostered stewardship for cultural resources in rural areas by planning field workshops on Bam Preservation and Histonc Rural Landscapes Helped develop a management plan for the Nansen Agncultural Histonc Distnct in Goodhue County Promoted departmental events and increased awareness of current preservation issues by developing new contacts with pnnt and broadcast media Developed a family of pnnted materials describing departmental activities and services Played a key role in obtaining a Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources grant to develop a senes of web -based documentanes featunng John Lauber Minnesota properties listed on the National Register of Histonc Places Created new partnerships with other agencies and organizations including the Preservation Alliance of Minnesota the University of Minnesota AIA Minnesota and The Fnends of the Minneapolis and Saint Paul Public libranes John Lauber 3220 Edmund Boulevard / Minneapolis MN 55406 / 612 722 3922 / jlauber@mn rr com Hess Roise and Company Minneapolis MN 1992 1996 Senior Research Histonan For more than three years I did archival research scholarly writing and project management for one of Minnesota's most respected histoncal consulting firms Projects included Histonc Amencan Engineenng Record documentation National Register and National Histonc Landmark nominations cultural resource surveys histonc context development and preservation planning These projects covered topics in architectural technological and social history and took me to 13 states and Canada Clients included the National Park Service the U S Army Corps of Engineers several State Histonc Preservation Offices public planning agencies and engineenng firms Minneapolis Planning Department St Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development Minneapolis MN 1992 St Paul MN Summer 1991 Preservation Planning Intern As a planning intern in Minnesota's two largest cities I was responsible for reviewing building permit applications in each crty's histonc districts to ensure compliance with established design guidelines Dunng my internships I worked closely with architects contractors and building owners I also reviewed architectural drawings conducted field inspections at building sites prepared staff reports and administered public hearings Minnesota Public Radio St Paul MN 1981 1990 Manager of Advertising and Marketing Communications For nine years I was responsible for planning creating and deploying a wide range of communications programs and matenals for the nation's foremost public radio system I completed projects for every MPR department including membership and development as well as A Praine Home Companion the Fitzgerald Theater and Public Radio International Duties included marketing copy writing project management staff supervision and departmental administration including budget planning Mohawk Advertising Mason City Iowa 1977 1980 Creative Director As part of a small staff at this full service advertising agency I had an opportunity to develop and hone my skills in many aspects of advertising, marketing and public relations My responsibilities included copy wnting art direction media planning budgeting and account management for a vanety of agncultural industnal and service clients John Lauber EDUCATION Cornell University College of Archrtecture Art and Planning Ithaca NY 1990-1991 Master of Arts Degree in Histonc Preservation Planning 1998 Completed coursework in 1991 and thesis in 1998 University of Iowa Bachelor of Arts Degree in Religious Studies 1974 Iowa City IA 1971 1974 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Histonc Properties Reuse Studies This program bnngs built environment specialists together with community leaders in an effort to find viable new uses for threatened historic properties The process combines features of a histonc structures report, a community visioning process a market study and an economic analysis I have served on 19 reuse teams since 1996 conducting condition assessments interviewing community residents writing historical narratives and issues analyses and participating in public presentations Kasota Village Hall Kasota MN 1996 St James Opera House St James MN 1996 Red VVng Central High School Red Wing,1998 Dania Hall Minneapolis MN 1998 Winsted City Hall Winsted MN 1998 1999 St Louis County Jail Duluth MN 1999 Chaska High School Chaska MN 2000 State/Lync Theater Virginia MN 2000 Spina Hotel Ironton MN 2000 George's Ballroom New Ulm MN Hoist Bay Resort Voyageurs National Park MN 2000 Baker Backus Schools International Falls MN 2000 Duluth Armory Duluth MN 2001 Moms High School Morns MN 2001 First Church of Chnst Scientist Fairmont MN 2001 Fergus Falls Regional Treatment Center Fergus Falls MN 2001 2002 Minnewaska Hospital Starbuck, MN 2002 Willmar Regional Treatment Center Willmar MN 2002 Ah Gwah Ching Center Walker MN 2002 Countryside Exchange The Countryside Exchange program was established in 1986 as a collaborative project between the US National Park Service and its counterpart agency in the Unrted IGngdom the Countryside Commission Utilizing hand-picked multidisciplinary teams of mid career built environment professionals with a common interest in preserving rural and small town life and a demonstrated commitment to community based problem solving, each exchange gives participants an opportunity to learn from each other while working closely with residents of a case study community John Lauber Walton on -the Naze Essex England September 2003 The exchange I participated in took place in Walton on the Naze a community of 6500 located on the east coast of England Once a popular resort for blue-collar workers from London's east end Walton's fortunes as a traditional destination have declined in recent decades due to changes in the European tounsm industry Blessed with an abundance of natural and histonc resources but faced with a set of issues that ranged from severe shoreline erosion an aging population a deteriorating central business distnct and potential loss of a crucial rail link communrty leaders asked the team to develop strategies for downtown revitalization and economic development through herrtage and eco tounsm In the Walton exchange I served as the historic preservation planner on an international team that included an environmentalist a geologist a community organizer a recreation planner a university tounsm professor and a county administrator Minnesota Design Team Visits Combining a communrty based planning exercise and a design charrette this program bnngs teams of planning professionals to small towns for a highly interactive session of information gathenng, visioning comprehensive planning/physical design Pillager MN May 1997 Located in the heart of the booming Brainerd lakes resort area this tiny village was struggling to maintain its distinctive identity and control growth while dealing with tremendous development pressure from rapid expansion of tounsm activity Cass Lake MN October 1997 Located within the Leech Lake Indian Reservation this community struggled with downtown decline an eroding tax base and a complicated junsdictional structure including tnbal city township and county governments as well as the U S Forest Service St Peter MN Apnl 1999 A 1998 tornado devastated vast portions of this histonc Minnesota River town but also gave community an unusual opportunity to rethink rts comprehensive plan with histonc preservation as a major componentJohn Lauber 3220 Edmund Boulevard / Minneapolis MN 55406 / 612 722 3922 / Ilauber@mn rr com SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS North Dakota State Institutions Mandan Jamestown and Grafton ND 1995 1996 Dunng 1995 1996 I completed four separate projects as part of an ongoing effort to document the history of publicly funded custodial institutions in North Dakota These projects were completed for the State Historical Society of North Dakota Division of Archeology and Histonc Preservation Specific studies included —National Register nominations for a histonc distnct and a dairy bam at the State Reform School in Mandan —Intensive level survey and histonc context development for the State Hospital for the Insane in Jamestown Portions of my survey were subsequently incorporated into a National Register historic distnct nomination for a portion of the complex —Intensive level survey and histonc context development for the Grafton State School (formerly the School for the Feeble Minded) at Grafton Central Comdor Transit Survey Minneapolis and St Paul MN 1994 1995 I researched and wrote a senes of histonc context narratives as part of a cultural resource survey of a proposed light rail route between Minneapolis and St Paul This project was completed on contract to BRW Incorporated Minneapolis for the Minnesota Department of Transportation Specific topics included —The evolution of transit links between the Twin Cities —The history of urban renewal efforts in downtown Minneapolis and in the area surrounding the State Capitol in St Paul —The development of architecture in downtown Minneapolis between 1880 and 1945 John Lauber Minuteman II ICBM Launch Facilities Vicinity of Wall SD 1993 1994 revised 1997 researched and wrote a National Histonc Landmark nomination for a Minuteman II intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) installation attached to Ellsworth Air Force Base Completed for the Rocky Mountain Regional Office of the National Park Service as part of the Legacy Resource Management Program The U S Congress designated this property as a National Histonc Landmark in November 1999 The National Park Service is currently developing the facility as a histoncal park Titan Missile Test Facilities Denver CO 1993 I conducted extensive pnmary and secondary source research in order to prepare level 1 Histonc Amencan Engineering Record documentation for the first fully integrated intercontinental ballistic missile production and test facility in the United States The 72 page narrative included a histoncal overview of the development of the Amencan ballistic missile program dunng the Cold War era Completed for the Rocky Mountain Regional Office of the National Park Service Rath Meat Packing Plant Waterloo IA 1992 1993 I completed level 1 Histonc Amencan Engineering Record documentation for one of the nation's largest beef and pork processing plants The study included an in depth discussion of the evolution of packinghouse technology and design Documentation included more than 140 large format photographs three sheets of process drawings and a 56 page narrative John Lauber 3220 Edmund Boulevard / Minneapolis MN 55406 / 612 722 3922 / jlauber@mn rr com Bluewater International Bndge Port Huron MI 1994 Lead researcher for a level 1 Historic Amencan Engineering Record documentation of an international bndge between Port Huron Michigan and Ontano Canada Erected in the mid-1930s this unusually graceful cantilever truss bndge resulted from a collaboration between Philadelphia architect Paul Cret and the prominent Harrisburg Pennsylvania bndge engineenng firm of Modleski and Masters Research sources for this project included original engineering drawings archived at the Ontano Ministry of Transportation in Toronto drawings photographs and correspondence files maintained by the offices of Modjeski and Masters papers from the Paul Cret collection at the University of Pennsylvania archives and a personal interview wrth Paul Cret Harbeson of Philadelphia son of Paul Cret's business partner Trafton Avenue/Millionaire's Road Historic District Malta MT 1993 Determination of National Register eligibility for a comprehensively planned bungalow development built in an early twentieth century railroad town on the banks of the Milk River Completed for the U S Army Corps of Engineers Omaha Distract Atlanta Town Hall Bruce WI 1992 Determination of National Register eligibility for a rural township hall Research proved that this now isolated property was onginally built as a rare two -room school that stood at the center of a thriving lumber town Completed for the Wisconsin Department of Transportation John Lauber MPR Radio Tower Survey Savage MN 1995 To help the client meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National Histonc Preservation Act of 1966 I completed a cultural resource survey to identify National Register eligible properties within the viewshed of a proposed radio tower site and assessed the project's visual impacts on the resources This project was completed on subcontract with System G Environmental Consultants St. Paul MN on behalf of Minnesota Public Radio Gray Cloud Lime Kiln Cottage Grove MN 1994 In-depth study of an early lime burning kiln located in one of the early focal points of European -American settlement in Minnesota The project document includes a thorough context narrative explonng the history of lime burning in Minnesota and descnbing the evolution of lime kiln technology Completed for the Minnesota Historical Society TRENDING BRANDING DESIGN LLC STEIN 0 430 FIRST AVENUE N SUITE 640 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 6123383339P 6123383275F W W W STEINLLC COM Sanford B. Stein, W.D., Presider* Sanford B Stem has gained national stature for design that is on the innovative edge m the retail mdustiy From specialty retailers to mass merchandisers, Mr Stem has assisted chents in successfully and creatively reaching customers through design solutions that are tactile, expenential expressions of the retailer's marketing strategy and brand positiomng Mr Stem founded SteinDesign in 1981 to focus on the challenging and ever -changing field of retail planning and design. Twenty years later in recogmrion of the retail industry's virtual and actual reinvention STIIN Trending Branding Design LLC recognizes the holistic and complex nature ofretaihng m the new millennium As President and Design Director, Mr Stem has been responsible for over 300 retail design projects rangmg from regional and national prototypes to mche and retail service concepts Stem's client list mcludes Andersen Renewal, Carlson Wagonlit Travel, Red Wing Sloes, Brunswick Billiards, Formica, Levolor, and Select Comfort As an avid student of contemporary culture, Mr Stem's sensitivity to retail trends and mche concepts can be seen in some of the most unique stores m the world-renowned Mall of Amenca, mcluduig the Red Wing Shoe Store and Runkel Bros Amencan Garage Sanford's thorough command of all aspects of trending and brand application has made hun a popular and sought after speaker on three continents Mr Stem has presented to standing mom only audiences at the National Retail Federation Convention & EXPO m 1999 and again m 2000, as well as Associacao Brasdeua de Marketing Dueto, Sao Paulo, Brazil (2000) Latmo Amencano Cnadores de Moda, Rio de Janeiro (2000) and TrendCongres 2000 m the Hague, Netherlands (2000) Quotations and excerpts of Mr Stein's addresses have appeared in such diverse pubhcations as Metropolis The Seattle Times Minneapolis Star & Tribune Women's Wear Daily's The Business Newsletter and Crain's Chicago Business Mr Stem has wntten or contributed to over 60 articles appearing m a vanety of publications mcludmg Interior Design Interiors Visual Merchandising and Store Design Retail Store Image Japan's trend monitor Pronto World's Best Store Designs Retail Reporhng's Stores of the Year and the acclaimed design textbook Interior Design by John Pile Mr Stein is a certified mtenor designer m the State of Minnesota. DISTINCTIONS Keynote Address ANTAD, September 2000 National Retailers Association of Mexico Annual Retailers Convention and Trade Show "Re -retailing - The Reinvention of Specialty Retailing for the New Economy" Mexico City Mexico Article Cram's Chicago Business, February 2001 Weighing Anchor TRENDING BRANDING DESIGN LLC STEIN Keynote Address Retail Direct Marketing July 2000 1st Latm-Amencan Congress for Fasluon Developers Rio de Janero, Brazil Keynote Address VEDIS and HBD, June 2000 Trendcongres 2000 - Retailing in the eEconomy The Hague, Netherlands Article VM & SD, June 2000 Can Stores Survive the Net? Article Meio & Mensagem (Brazilian Advertismg/Marketmg) May 2000 Keynote Address ABEMD n Brazilian Direct Marketing Association, May 2000 2nd International Seminar on Retail Direct Marketing Sao Paulo Brazil Article VM & SD, March 2000 Brave New World Presentation Design Futures Council February 2000 Re -retailing Remventmg Retail for the New Economy Cordillera, CO Article Arclutecture Minnesota, January/February 2000 Face to Face Presentation National Retail Federation, January 2000 89th Annual Convention & EXPO New York, NY Keynote Panel Amencan Institute of Architects of Minnesota, November 1999 65th Annual Convention & Products Expo Article VM & SD, October 1999 A Wing and a Player Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc Article Metropolis, May 1999 The Mall Doctor Article City Business, May 1999 "Malls Turning Inside Out" TRENDING BRANDING DESIGN LLC STEIN Articles Web/DNR Specialty Stores, March 1999 Busmess Newsletter Success Strategies "Retailing for the Next Millennium" Award Chain Store Age, February 1999 Smgle Umt - Auto Fun Presentation National Retail Federation, January 1999 88th Annual Convention & EXPO New York, NY Presentation Painting & Decorating Retailers Association, 1998 Convention St. Louis, MO Article VM & SD October 1998 Retailing for the Next Millennium Article Real Estate Journal, May 1998 Keeping Pace with Today's Consumer Andersen Renewal Lecture Museum Store Association, 1998 National Meeting St. Lours MO Guest Lecturer Stout State University March 1996, 1997, 1998 Career day Article Stores of the Year 10, 1996 Runkel Bros Amencan Garage Everything But Water Juror General Electric Edison Awards, 1996 Nela Park, Cleveland, OH Article Retail Store Image, October 1996 "How to Design Stores for Service Retailers" Article Retail Store Image, September 1996 "A New Look for Andersen Windows" Article Retail Store Image, September 1995 "Retro Retailing" Runkle Brothers Amencan Garage