Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-01-11 HPC Packetjllwater. ,.......... THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission Tuesday, January 11, 2004 700pm City Council Chambers City Hall 216 North Fourth Street AGENDA Approval of December 6, 2004 minutes 1 Case No DR/05-01 Review of an application to operate a Bed and Breakfast Inn, the James Mulvey House located at 622 W Churchill Street Bnnt Butchart and Teary O'Hara, applicants — Tabled 2 Case No DR/05-02 Design review for signage for a Karate business located at 122 New England Place Troy Lewis, applicant 3 Meet with National Trust for Historic Preservation representatives, Christina Morns and Lisa Weissman and Michael Koop from The State Histonc Society to talk about your HPC and why and how it works so well Other items a Update on photo inventory for Staples and Mays Addition Architectural Study b Update on North Main Street banners c Update on Midwest Lumber pylon sign d Review of comments from Melissa Pfannenstem-project architect for Stillwater Mills CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651 430 8800 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 6, 2004 Present Howard Lieberman, chair, Phil Eastwood, Diane Hark, Jeff Johnson, Brent Peterson and Roger Tomten Others Planner Sue Fitzgerald Absent Patte Kraske Mr Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Tomten asked that the minutes of Nov 1, 2004, be amended to reflect the fact that the materials/information pertaining to the Stillwater Mills on Main update were not provided for distnbution in the Commission's meeting packet Mr Lieberman moved to amend the minutes of Nov 1, 2004, as suggested by Mr Tomten Mr Johnson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Mr Peterson, seconded by Mr Lieberman, moved to approve the amended minutes, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-41 Design review Mulberry Street and Main Street representing the applicant Present representing the applicant manager, Dave May and Andy May of revisions of matenals for Stillwater Mills at Melissa Pfannenstein, DJR Architecture, Inc , were Ms Pfannenstein, Scott England, project Included in the agenda packet was a letter from Ms Pfannenstein regarding "clarification" of HPC meeting minutes She noted there are no minutes of an Oct 4 meeting at the project's Design/Sales Center when the architects presented samples of masonry matenals and a booklet of electncal fixture cuts Mr Lieberman and Mr Johnson pointed out the Oct 4 meeting was not a regular HPC meeting, but was more of an informational or workshop session, thus no minutes were recorded Mr England asked if it would be possible to review and accept the matenals presented at the Oct 4 session at this time Mr Lieberman said because only three HPC members were present at the meeting at the Design Center, that would not be possible There was a bnef discussion of the requested use of Norman brick Ms Pfannenstem noted Norman bnck had been approved for use at the Lofts projects Mr England also spoke to some historical precedent Also included in the agenda packet was a list of requested revisions and actions taken at the Nov 1 HPC meeting Ms Pfannenstein noted that the proposal to use stucco on the balconies has been withdrawn Ms Pfannenstein reviewed each of the requested revisions There was a discussion of the requested removal of the public restroom from the retail lobby, which Mr Johnson and Mr Lieberman both said was a significant issue 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission December 6, 2004 for the city of Stillwater Ms Pfannenstein said public restrooms were not required in the development agreement, she also stated providing public restrooms is a secunty issue, as well as a cost issue Mr England noted that retail stores are required by code to provide restrooms open to the public Ms Pfannenstem reiterated that extra parking and public restrooms are not mentioned in the development agreement, and she noted that the conditions of approval have changed from what was signed Community Development Director Steve Russell, who was present for this case, pointed out that both the use permit and design permit contained conditions of approval, some of which were part of the original agreement with previous developer, Archnet Mr Russell also suggested that the Planning Commission, rather than the HPC, should consider the parking and public restroom issues Ms Pfannenstein asked for copies of the permit documents After discussion, it was decided to take action on the requested revisions individually, by elevation Mr Johnson stated he did not have a big concern with the proposal to remove brick pavers from the east plaza retail boardwalk However, he suggested that something be done with the Joints to prevent a big run of concrete Mr Peterson moved to approve the removal of brick pavers from the east plaza Mr Eastwood seconded the motion Mr Tomten asked about the public sidewalk Ms Pfannenstein said the sidewalk would be replaced after construction is complete Motion of approval passed unanimously East Elevation — Main Street Mr Johnson said he remained concerned about the use of Norman bnck on the Main Street elevation, suggesting the patterns/style is not in keeping with the architecture of the building Mr Lieberman said he shared that concern Mr Johnson moved to deny the use of Norman brick on Facade B and G, to approve replacing the arched octagon opening at Facade G to a flat top opening, and deny the use of stucco at balconies and the removal of metal railings and trim Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously South Elevation — Mulberry Street Mr Tomten moved to approve the use of Norman brick at Facade J and the removal of the miscellaneous ornamental metal at facades J, L and M Mr Eastwood seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously North Elevation — Alley Mr Johnson noted this elevation represents a challenge as it carnes around to the Main Street elevation Mr Peterson agreed, noting that this elevation is visible to those coming into town from the north Mr Johnson moved to deny the use of Norman brick at Facade G and to approve the replacement of the arched octagon openings and domed ceiling to a flat ceiling as applicable to Facade G on Main Street Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Ms Pfannenstein requested that the Commission consider the use of Norman bnck on Facade H Mr Johnson noted that Facade H is something of a transition area and the use of Norman 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission December 6, 2004 might help make the transition Mr Johnson moved to amend his motion regarding the North Elevation to include approval of the use of Norman bnck on Facade H Mr Peterson seconded the amendment, amendment passed unanimously West Elevation/Plaza Mr Tomten moved to approve the four requested revisions — removal of one set of double windows in the 30 and 36 bay of units, omit coloring of concrete plaza, utilize Norman brick in lieu of modular, utilize a red Glen-gery brick in lieu of Belden Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Mr Johnson noted the use of Glen-gery versus Belden was a supplier issue, and will not result in any visual change Retaining Wall Mr Johnson noted that according to Condition of Approval No 17, the city engineer is responsible for approval of the retaining wall construction However, Mr Johnson moved to direct the applicant to submit design plans for scale and appearance of the wall to the HPC, suggesting that the face units be in proportion to the height of the structure and that the top be capped Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Retail Lobby The requested revisions include the removal of the unisex restrooms, replacement of porcelain tile with stained concrete, and removal of brick walls Mr Lieberman suggested the issue of requinng a public restroom is more an issue for the Planning Commission Mr Johnson noted that if restrooms are not required, then the retail lobby changes are not relevant to the HPC Dave May suggested that the lobby is a private space, not a public space, and is beyond the scope of HPC review Mr May also spoke of the real concerns of providing public restrooms due to security issues Mr Lieberman made a motion to refer the restroom issue to the Planning Commission and to ask the applicant to return to the HPC, as a courtesy, if restrooms are required Mr Johnson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously The 23 Conditions of Approval were reviewed HPC members expressed a concern that Condition No 1 might imply the buildings could be higher than four stones It was agreed to change the language to Limit parapet to the 4th story Regarding Condition No 2, details of the first story public space and merchant space shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC, Mr England asked about the possibility of bricking off a window if a tenant requested The consensus was that would be OK if done from the interior of the space It was agreed to change the wording of No 2 to "details of the exterior of the first story public space " 3 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 6, 2004 Regarding Condition No 3, screening all utilities, Ms Pfannenstein pointed out that the transformer cannot be screened Regarding Condition No 5, landscaping, it was agreed to add submission and approval of a landscape plan Regarding Condition No 9, trash enclosure, Ms Pfannenstein pointed out all residential trash will be stored within the building However, she agreed that condition could be retained as it applies to commercial trash, if any is stored outside the building Ms Fitzgerald said Condition No 11, parking, should be eliminated Members agreed that Condition No 23 should include the wording "reviewed and approved by the HPC " Mr Johnson moved to approve the Conditions of Approval with the aforementioned changes to No 1, No 2, No 5, No 9 and No 23, deleting No 11, and adding wording referring Conditions No 17 and 18 regarding wall design and materials to the HPC's earlier motion pertaining to the retaining wall Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-66 Design review of signage for Cub Foods at 1801 Market Dnve Kay Reiter, Leroy Signs, representing the applicant The applicant was not present Ms Fitzgerald explained the request is to change the colonng of an existing sign Mr Eastwood, seconded by Ms Hark, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed unanimously Case No DR/04-67 Design review of building conversion and signage for Herberger's at 2001 Washington Avenue Bob Bowman, Chipman Adams Ltd, representing the applicant The applicant was not present Ms Fitzgerald explained that weather problems prevented the applicant from attending the meeting The applicant will be at the January meeting to present landscaping plans, she said Ms Fitzgerald said there will be no more signage that for the existing use The existing bnck will be painted a tan color Mr Johnson moved approval as conditioned, with an additional condition that a landscaping plan be submitted and approved by the HPC Mr Peterson seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously 4 City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission December 6, 2004 Other items • Ms Fitzgerald said the city is in the process of doing designs for Schulenberg and Settler's parks The Park Board would like a recommendation from the HPC regarding an historical marker for Schulenberg Park recognizing the site of the Schulenberg School • Mr Tomten updated members on the results of a meeting he had with the contractors for the proposed resurfacing of the rear elevation of the Sammie's space There also was a written update in the agenda packet Mr Johnson said not much progress has been made with the renovation of the Labor Temple Members questioned why the HPC had not been involved with the review of plans for Tim's Corner Market at Churchill and South Fourth Members felt that the HPC should be involved in a review of all commercial uses, regardless of the location • Mr Johnson raised an issue with signage at Whitey's, the old John's Bar • Ms Fitzgerald stated light cuts for Terra Springs Building 3 had been submitted • There was a discussion of the trash enclosure for the Water Street Inn Ms Fitzgerald said, while not masonry, the enclosure is an improvement Because the enclosure will have to be moved when improvements to Lowell Park are done, Mr Russell approved the enclosure, Ms Fitzgerald said Members were in consensus that the proposed trash enclosure does not meet the previous conditions of approval for the site Mr Johnson moved to indicate to the applicant that the HPC has received drawings for the proposed trash enclosure, that the drawings do not conform to the original conditions of approval, and that the HPC took no action Mr Lieberman seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Mr Eastwood moved to adjourn at 9 20 p m Mr Lieberman seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 5 • i .1. Case No DR/05-01 has been tabled to a later date HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPUCATiON DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DRIO5-02 Heritage Preservation Date January 11, 2005 Project Location 122 New England Place Comprehensive Plan Distnct Village Commercial Zoning Distnct VC Applicant's Name Troy Lewis, representing USA Karate Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of exterior signage Discussion The applicant is requesting design review and approval of two 2' by 20' wall signs for the Karate business that is going into the center They will be placed on the east and west sides of the building The signs have a tan background with red lettenng USA letters are red, white and blue, with a black karate belt painted around it Both signs be lit externally with gooseneck fixtures Recommendation, Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 No additional signage Findings' The proposal meets the intent of the Planned Unit Development Attachments: Application FormjElevataon Drawing 12/02'2004 11 13 6514308810 CIT" OF STILLr1ATER PAGE 01 Case No `a5" O. Date File - 2,a- Receipt No,' 1N Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Photos, sketches and a letter of Intent is required All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of stallwater, Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required All following Information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project i z2 nle.,, C,3 In ?Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District, Description of Project in detail 3 r\ s-i-a4 / 5 VI f 11� MOut- r�. vA-v�c� C -C9 lit ss 161— Gam- -Y- .`mil }-cr�- "Shereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and balref, to be true and correct, f further certify .F will comply with the permit if it is granted and used? If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature Is required Property Owner IrRerri esentative 4. &L..J, S Mailing Address 7 trc l vukA-r, (> Mailing Address.31 L City State Zip eb Imo" 5 l ?T City State Ziptaarll(ou -1 , Mil/ S Iz S Telephone No l l p- 7 d 3 — S { Lin Telephone Na H \ntcnamara\.shellajxpoz\design review permlt wpd April 12, 2002 I v � t c A?ri(c.o_i Dec 1,,,j- ��� Yl 91-.< THE POWERFUL ALTERNATIVE 2110 Eagle Creek Ln Suite 550 Woodbury, MN 55129 RE: Letter Of Intent For Installing signage To whom it may concern: K.A.K. Inc, DBA USA Karate Intends to install signage above main front entrance and rear entrance at the space we will occupy at 122 New England Place, the Liberty Village Development. All drawings and color schemes for the intended signage are attached. Sincerely, K.A.K. Inc. DBA: USA Karate By: Title: Date: v � I,/ a a( 0%1 33 01/2" • b �� `NUM — ■■■■ -_ .... _ — .... -�-- ■■■■ = -- ^ = ■■■■ = , — — _ •- L-D fr e e Vr n vr-e '' we. b I— s e yr -- �� 4 SIGNCE BY --- I UV r4IN r e UV N MU Ma D' n Yd TIOvr - 1? — co o. 0. - x _ La 5-8 ;rr, ae ,rr, 6 W 33 0 1/2" ra' 42 { r MIME -r. , = OMEN Ff _ NMI r P2 P! -4_1__ —10'1 b IVr F. II IBI 10!VJ 4.0' U -0' 5-s rr ri se 66 I I 1 E s s 1 _V 4 .. al C$- 0- Hip pliu 1 I 1 IOa 1... Is t ..a J i 1 1 71 LI t c 1 8 "--ct8.0 el el 1' ilinteli iive in r-i I/r Details: Sandcarved in HDU, shaped and painted per artwork shown above. Dimensions - 2' high by 20' wide by 1-1/2" thick (in two sections, each 10' wide) Attached flush to building exterior. Externally illuminated. 12/07/2004 17 39 6514394035 I Sett Sy Dahlen S qr. Co GSCC 952 888 7178, Doc 7 04 a 50PIA, PAGE 01 Page 1/1 ON OR I EAR THE CORNER OF N MAII' AND MULBERRY ST EAST siDE OF STREET (CRAMER WEBSITE ON BACK) (Z(7 /Of ACROSS FROM THE SHOPS IN THE STAPLES MILL BUILDING (2-SIDED) UCU—U (—GUU4 1 UC U4 GO CI i CLCI ICIY I O, 111U rHA IYU (00 G1U (IOU r U1 i ELEMENTS, INC • 10044 FLANDERS CT NE SUITE 100 • BLAINE MN 55449 Ath 1-800-223 2788 (763) 210-7747 • FAX (763) 210 7750 • www elementsinc com Fax Transmittal Cover Page Date 12iJci To ate f 5-11111. A FX: 0i-y30-sr/o ff‘Phtitelf 'The nation s leading provider of signage for builders developer; and the multi housing Industry (763) 210 7747 Office (763) 210 7750 Fax (800) 223 2788 Toll Free jimcarisoneeiementsInc com From JIM CARLSON ACCOUNT MANAQER ELEMENTS INC • 10044 FLANDERS CT NE STE 100 BLAINE MN 65449 Comments Gcpj or fr:;510 the MinLvmeig, Total Pages including this cover page 'THE NATION S LEADING PROVIDER OF SIGNAGE FOR BUILDERS, DEVELOPERS & THE MULTI HOUSING INDUSTRY Westbrook Midwest Lumber 9/30/03 i J 3 01 8 3' X 8' Illuminated Low Profile Monument Sign Westbrook Development Attn Greg Watson 651-646-1967 (fax) 646-6445 3040 Woodbury Drive Woodbury, MN 55129 SIGN SYSTEMS, INC. Job Site Midwest Lumber Stillwater, MN DESIGN 4 FABRICATION 4 INSTALLATION 0 SERVICE 5680 Flint Troll Wyoming, MN 55092 651-462-2613 (Fax) 651-462 2492 £00Z-L0-100 1N3NdJ13(13Q `100Z1H1Sal Sbb99b9tS9 DEC-07-2004 TUE 04 28 PM ELEMENTS, Y N STRINGERS ❑ 0 CORNER RND ❑ 0 EXTENSIONS 0 0 1 0 2 ❑ S❑ ®SAILV6U45115D Cara Sfifj w/crai _ b SCAALLE 3/4°=1 1_0" o 96%) TO txl 95 J 91" midwest Iumber minnesota, inc. 2+ (056,0 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE _ PLEASE DELIVER TO FROM ELEMENTS, INC FAX (763) 210-7750 121124.90 05147IW To MAU, Eutaw. Cars builtrg PROJECT NAME CLIENT REVISED 10044 Flanders a Ste 100 ■ Blaine MN 55449 • (800) 223 2788 • (763) 210 7747 4•-j TO OF PROPOSAL © ELEMENTS, INC 2004 THIS DESIGN IS THE PROPERTY OF ELEMENTS, [NC AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION 0 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN DJR ARCHITECTURE INC December 22, 2004 Steve Russell, Community Development Director Sue Fitzgerald, City Planner City of Stillwatei 216 N Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 333 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 UNION PLAZA MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 PHONE 612 676 2700 FAX 612 676 2796 Re Requests for Corrections to Design Review Permit Case No DR/04-41 HPC Meeting 12/6/04 Dear Mr Russell and Ms Fitzgerald, The following is a list of corrections that DJR Architecture, Inc the representative for Stillwater Mills On Main, LLC is requesting to the Design Review Permit from the Hentage Preservation Commission meeting from December 6, 2004 Attached is a redlined copy referencing the following items Page 1 1 East Elevation — Main Street There was no request for review nor action taken pertaining to the last item Ornamental metal pn front (east) Please remove this item 2 North Elevation — Alley Facade `H' utilize Norman Bnck was approved not denied, please revise as approved Page 2 1 West Elevation/Plaza Spelling correction for Glen-Gery 2 Retaining Wall and Retaining Lobby After reviewing all documents related to this project There are no requirements under the list of Conditions of Approval as approved by the City Council on November 18 (Resolution 2003-241) and the Development Agreement that requires HPC approval of these five items, please remove from the list 1 Page 2/3 3 Asterisks item This project was denied approval for a Conditional/Special Use Permit by the Planning Commission The approval for a Conditional/Special Use Permit was approved by the City Council on November 18, 2003 without requirements in the Conditions of Approval requinng public restrooms 4 Conditions of Approval Melissa Pfannenstein provided HPC with a copy of the approved Design Review Permit from June 7, 2004 and indicated that several of the items that were included in the Conditions of Approval had not been part of the Development Agreement nor the previous Conditions of Approval from the Design Review Permit, dated June 7, 2004 Steve Russell indicated that they were part of the onginal Conditions of Approval Melissa Pfannenstem indicated that she was willing to accept the revisions to the Conditions of Approval, assuming that they were part of the onginal Conditional Use Permit Please, revise the list of Conditions of Approval to reflect the Conditions of Use Permit, Design Review Permit dated June 7, 2004 and the Development Agreement Please maintain all enumerations as indicated in the Design Review Permit from June 7, 2004 Only those that are part of the onginal agreement may be addressed From the agenda list from December 6, 2004, HPC motioned for items 1 and 11 to indicate not used Item 8, was to include the words, "or located inside " 5 In response to extenor modifications the documents that are approved read as follows Resolution 2003-241 November 18, 2003 T All extenor modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by HPC Design Review Permit June 7, 2004 16 All extenor modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Cominumty Development Director Development Agreement June 17, 2004 P 4 Minor modifications and modifications that do not change the extenor of the size of any structures may be approved by the Community Development Director 2 • DJR requests that all items relating to extenor modification be approved by the Community Development Director as indicated in the Development Agreement At the Community Development Director's discretion we will submit items to HPC for approval However, when there are small items of concern or time constraints we will ask for the Community Development Director's response This may entail the Community Development director contacting HPC outside of their typical approved meeting time for review (For example, we have two separate buyers that are combining units This combination of units may result in relocating a balcony door or omitting an air conditiomng grille) These items will have a time urgency related to signing purchase agreements and are items we feel the Community Development Director can make with out requiring HPC review Please call if you have any questions Sincerely, Me issa fannenstein Project Architect 612 676 2741 3 ORIGINAL CITY OF STILLWATER Case No DR/04-41 HPC Meeting 12/6/04 DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT Heritage Preservation Meeting Date December 6, 2004 Description of Project Design review modifications of Stillwater Mills on Mains Condominiums Applicant Melissa Pfannenstein, DJR Archtecture Applicant Address 333 Washington Avenue, North, Suite 210, Minneapolis MN 55401 Project Address Southwest Corner of Main and Mulberry Property ID No N/A Zoning District CBD Project Descnption Design review of modifications to Stillwater Mills on Main Condominium Project Action by HPC on Requested Revision 12/6/04 East Plaza Retail Boardwalk • Remove brick pavers Approved East Elevation — Main Street • Facade "B" — utilize Norman brick in lieu of modular brick Denied • Facade "G" — utilize Norman brick in lieu of modular brick Denied • Facade "G" replace arched octagon openings to flat top Approved • Brick to remain at balcony conditions for Facades "B", "D" & "F" Approved • rlrnamantal maf al nn front (e �l ll g0 iv10TtO4 iii "`.111'1 South Elevation — Mulberry • Facade "3" — utilize Norman brick in lieu of modular brick Approved • Remove miscellaneous ornamental metal at Facades "3", "L" & "M" Approved North Elevation — Alley • Facade "G" — reduce amount of Rockcast and replace with Norman Brick Denied Approved Approved Denied • Facade "G" replace arched octagon openings to flat top • Facade "G" replace domed ceiling of octagon to flat ceiling • Facade "G" utilize Norman brick In lieu of modular • Facade "H" utilize Norman brick eni v ED West Elevation/Plaza • Remove one set of double windows in the 30 and 36 bay of units • Omit coloring of concrete plaza • Utilize Norman brick in lieu of modular • Utilize a red Gle rick in lieu of Belden gel Retaining Wall • Examining reducing heights of retaining wall • Replace Recon wall with Keystone wall Retail Lobby • Remove unisex restrooms • Replace porcelain tile with stained concrete • Remove brick walls Approved Approved Approved Approved No Action* No Action* No Action* No Action* No Action* *The Heritage Preservation Commission recommends to the Planning Commission that the public restrooms not be removed from submitted proposal Conditions of Approval (1 oN ,A&r Naas NCsr use-p� 11) Details of first story exterior public space and exterior merchant space shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC (I)Z All utilities shall be completely screened from public view se DKP u 1 04-- (2),3' A lighting plan showing the building fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted for Heritage Preservation approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles Sa i -P li -1 04- (3)4' All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission CAW Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas Cf)&- Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project Obyl The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street (1)fr The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project oF- °AT LS) gr All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during construction activity 010 o No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 00) 0 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 00 i/Z Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems u2)]' A sign permit shall be required for all project signs C'3)J,4 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued Cj nor tze 60 I r-ez7, P R. pP - ri tycoav , G t l P-W/1 PA iel— O F Pe'�LOP1-1501— Ad EE r1 N-1T t, r1 04-- ( (j01- " Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs Qt5)18 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission c1S),1 All secunty lights on building shall be downllt 0) 20 A sign permit is required for signage CID) jel the HPC 155- PEP— t v!rW1:11 14T .66-et riet-T We accept the conditions of this permit We understand that any changes from these plans must be resubmitted for approval Owner or Representative Date 12 .Daa L. 041—