Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-12-08 CPC Packet• i 'water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, December 8, 2003, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of November 10, 2003 AGENDA 1 Case No V/03-95 A variance to the sign regulations for additional canopy signage (one sign permitted) located at 601 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District Todd Weiss, applicant Continued from November 10, 2003 Planning Commission Meeting 2 Case No V/03-100 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 9 feet and 6'6" requested) for construction of a front porch and stoop located at 807 South Fifth in the RB, Two Family Residenital District Heidi and Chris Lottsfeldt, applicants 3 Case No V/03-101 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet requested) and to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 20 feet requested) for the construction of a residence located between 1419 and 1323 West Ramsey Street (a newly created lot) located in the RA, Single Family Residential District Tom Larson, applicant 4 Case No SUP/V/03-102 A special use permit for an accessory dwelling (800 square feet allowed, 820 square feet proposed) on a 22,590 square foot lot (10,000 square feet required) with a variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 6 feet requested) and to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 6 feet requested) located at 418 South Holcombe Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Brian Enright, applicant Other Items CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430 8800 City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 10, 2003 Present Robert Gag, Chair, Mike Dahlquist, David Junker, David Middleton, David Peroceschi, Paul Teske and Jerry Turnquist Others Commumty Development Director Steve Russell Absent Karl Ranum and Darwin Wald Mr Gag called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m Approval of Minutes Mr Junker, seconded by Mr Turnquist, moved approval of the minutes of October 13, 2003 Mr Dahlquist noted that he had not moved approval of the September 8, 2003 minutes as indicated Mr Turnquist said it was likely he who had made that motion Motion to approve the October 13, 2003 minutes as amended passed unanimously Case No V/03-90 A variance to the street setback (30 feet required, 13 feet requested), accessory building size (120 square feet allowed, 508 square feet proposed) for a second garage at 2440 Bayberry Ave in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Joe Fisher, applicant Mr Fisher was present He said his backyard abuts County Road 12, and he never thought setback would be an issue He said he is proposing an additional garage and attached shed because the location of utilities and a neighbor's deck made it difficult to do an addition to the existing garage He said the new structure would be used for storage only It was noted the applicant's proposal requires three vanances — for setback, a second accessory building and size of the accessory building Mr Middleton noted that the Planning Commission's position has been to deny garages as a second accessory building Mr Teske said he was concerned about the impact of the proposal on the character of the neighborhood, suggesting that the magnitude of the proposal is almost commercial in nature Mr Teske moved to deny Case V/03-90 Mr Middleton seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No VBM/03-91 The applicant was not present and later indicated to Mr Russell in a telephone call that he was no longer interested in pursuing the request Mr Middleton moved to deny the case based on the fact there was no response from the applicant Mr Peroceschi seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-92 A vanance to the street setback (30 feet required, 17 feet requested) for construction of an enclosed stairway to the basement at 523 W Moore St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Enca Flutz, applicant 1 City of Stillwater Nanning Commission November 10, 2003 Mr Flutz was present The agenda item indicated an additional request for a vanance for a front porch, that project has already been completed Ms Flutz explained that the original access to the basement has been closed off due to a mold issue The new, extenor entrance would be done in cinder block with a metal door, just above surface level, enclosing the entry The entry would be landscaped with shrubs Mr Middleton noted the property is on a corner lot, which can create a hardship for meeting setbacks Mr Junker, seconded by Mr Teske, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed 6- 0, with Mr Peroceschi abstaining Case No V/03-93 A vanance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 1 foot requested) for construction of a 3-season porch, mudroom, tool shed, basement entry and replacement deck (partially completed) at 107 N Owens St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Jeffrey S Kartak, applicant Mr Kartak was present He said he has owned the property for seven years and is trying to make improvements He said he has replaced the windows He explained that a drainage problem under the deck prompted him to dig footings to get the water away from the foundation, and he started building Dave Froehner, neighbor to the north, said the applicant told him about his plans, and he (Froehner) suggesting installing gutters to avid drainage problems Mr Froehner was not opposed to the plans Mr Junker suggested that there should be some ramification for beginning work on a project of this scope without obtaining a permit Mr Middleton noted that the size of the lot , 35' x 126' feet, creates a hardship for meeting the setback He suggested adding a condition regarding installation of gutters Mr Teske noted the house is already out of compliance He agreed that there should be some ramification of proceeding without a permit and said if the apphcant had come before the Commission pnor to beginning construction, the plans likely would have been denied However, he said at this point, he can understand why the applicant aligned the structure with the property line He said he would reluctantly move approval as conditioned, with the additional condition that gutters be installed on the north side of the building Mr Turnquist seconded the motion 2 City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 10, 2003 Mr Junker asked the applicant about the timeframe for completion The applicant responded he wold get the outside completed as soon as the footings are inspected There also was some discussion as to whether the applicant would try to match the exterior of the onginal building or do all new siding Motion to approve passed unanimously Case No SUP/03-94 A request for modification of a special permit for additional services at St Croix Valley Life Care Center at 713 County Road 5 in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Nancy Kiolbasa, applicant The applicant was present The Center currently provides counseling services The request is to add pregnancy testing and STD testing and limited ultrasound testing Mr Teske asked if the additional services would change the Center's client use Ms Kiolbasa said the intent was to serve the existing clients better She said hours would not change, but they may need to be a bit more flexible in order to provide the new services Mr Middleton asked if annual review is a condition of the SUP Mr Russell said review is upon complaint Mr Junker moved approval as conditioned Mr Teske seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No SUB/03-96 A subdivision of two existing lots (15,000 square feet each) into two lots of 22,500 square feet and 7,500 square feet at 921 North Second St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Jim Russell, applicant Mr Russell said he realized the steep slopes of the property restrict use He said he has no building plans at this time, the intent is to legally descnbe the upper tract Kathy Baker, 1007 N Second St , a neighbonng property owner, was present for the discussion, but did not comment Mr Middleton noted that the new, lower lot has less than 6,000 square feet of buildable space when the slopes are excluded The applicant suggested that something might be able to be built there in the future Mr Dahlquist said he was concerned with creating a lot that would require a vanance in the future Mr Junker agreed that the slopes are too steep and approving the request would create a lot that isn't usable 3 City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 10, 2003 Mr Junker moved to deny Case SUB/03-96 Mr Dahlquist seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No SUB/V/03-97 A subdivision of a 10,800 square foot lot occupied by a duplex into two substandard lots of 5,400 square feet each (7,500 square feet required for single family residence) at 1002 Sixth Ave S in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Tony Lodge, applicant Mr Lodge was present He explained that the existing structure, although descnbed as a duplex, has been converted to a single-family residence He said he felt that constructing another small house on the property would "serve the community better than a poorly designed duplex " The resident of 1010 Sixth Ave S expressed a concern about the possible impact on property values and the proximity of an additional structure to her house The resident of 1009 S Sixth Ave also expressed a concern about the impact on property values Steve Russell noted he had received three calls all concerned about the request Mr Peroceschi noted that a vanance would be required to put a house on the newly -formed lot Mr Middleton pointed out that all the houses in the area are built on lots with 40' street frontage Mr Teske suggested that the proposal may be consistent with the neighborhood, but not necessanly desirable Mr Junker and Mr Gag felt the lots would be too small for two single-family houses Mr Junker, seconded by Mr Teske, moved to deny Case No SUB/V/03-97 Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-95 A vanance to the sign regulations at 601 N Main St in the CBD, Central Business Distnct Todd Weiss, applicant Mr Russell said the applicant had called and would be unable to attend the meeting because of an accident Mr Teske, seconded by Mr Middleton, moved to continue the case, motion passed unanimously Case No CPA/03-01 Downtown Plan update for area bounded by Myrtle, Mulberry, Main Streets and the St Croix River designating park land, flood protection location, parking, trail and pedestnan comdor between Main Street and the St Croix River City of Stillwater, apphcant Mr Russell bnefly reviewed four alternative plans that have been considered by planning consultants, vanous city commissions and Downtown Plan Coordinating Committee Option D is the recommended alternative Plan D, he said, provides for a strong connection from Main Street 4 City of Stillwater Planning Commission November 10, 2003 to the nver, a linear trail link, potential site for a visitors' center/public rest rooms, increased Lowell Park acreage, flood protection alternative alignment The plan moves a proposed parking structure away from the river to the slope of Second Street Mr Junker noted that a log of diverse groups and interests have been involved in looking at alternatives Plan D, he said, represents a good comprise Mr Junker moved to recommend the Plan D concept Mr Teske seconded the motion Mr Dahlquist asked about flood control structures/elevations Mr Russell said feasibility studies will further define the type of flood structure and locations Motion to approve Plan D, in concept, passed unanimously Other Items Mr Russell noted that developers of the Arbours have appealed the Planning Commission's denial to the City Council The developers have eliminated the penthouse and one story from their plans to stay within the 50' maximum building height requirement Mr Russell said Commission Member Karl Ranum has challenged the legality of the revised plans going before the Council, Mr Ranum is of the opinion that the new plans should come back to the Planning Commission Mr Russell asked whether the Commission would like an opinion on the issue from City Attorney David Magnuson The consensus was to request an opimon — five in favor, Mr Middleton and Mr Peroceschi disagreed Mr Russell reminded members of the Nov 17 special meeting regarding the Boutwell Area transportation study Mr Turnquist, seconded by Mr Junker, moved to adjourn at 9 p m , all in favor Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 5 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-95a Planning Commission Date December 8, 2003 Project Location 601 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Todd Weiss, representing the Stillwater Depot Grill Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance for additional exterior signage for the Stillwater Depot Grill Background This case was continued from the November 10, 2003 meeting in order to have the applicant attend the meeting Discussion The applicant is applying for a Variance to the number of signs and a Variance to an intenor lit canopy The sign ordinance for the Central Business District permits one wall, monument, awning and canopy or three-dimensional sign per business When a building or business abuts two or more public streets, an additional sign located on each street building face is allowed There is an existing freestanding monument sign for the Stillwater Depot Grill (Attachment A) The applicant has installed a red canopy over the front entrance of the Grill The canopy is lit from the interior The words "The Stillwater Depot Grill" are pnnted in white on all three sides of the canopy creating an additional three signs for the business HPC conducted design review of the canopy at the 11/03/03 meeting and offered suggestions listed at the bottom of this page under HPC Action Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggests the following conditions of approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 No additional signage 3 The canopy shall not be internally lit Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a vanance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Elevation Drawings HPC Action 11/03/03 Approval of one freestanding sign for the Stillwater Depot and one sign on the canopy for the Stillwater Depot GnII — illuminated from the outside of the canopy with gooseneck light fixture, not internally ht. Directional signs to the dinner train and to the grill shall be 2 feet by 2 feet and shall not have the name of the business on it. +5-0 PLANNING ADMINIS ; ION APPLICATION FORA►, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Perri- , Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendn ? x Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this applcat,on *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting materia submitted in connection with any appbcation All supporting material (, e submitted with appl�cat►on becomes the property ,photos, sketches, etc) P p rty of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with appbcat,ons Any incomplete appl►catio supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project l'c l Mb Aawlg ST-, Zoning District D fl Description of Project S1 6 K w6 64 G o/ /✓ r42? ?I ) s?,«a14/sty- Zftri1 „ (it Assessor's Parcel Nop2&oW/ 4O& "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith ►, respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner T A•i Mailing Address to o c 14D t t tart k Sr • City - State - Zip S6Uw6lKr Telephone No Gf/ y,�0 ;36GL Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Representative "--tc t (o Qte,s Mailing Address t d / // /1,10N City - State - Zip ,� i14v4t o'er /ti1y 5 W Telephone No G S/ Signature (Sign ure is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing Height of Buildings Stories Pnncipal Accessory Feet Proposed Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces square feet square feet H \mcnamara\shella\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 LAKE ST CROIX 16101 DM DN OP WATERS PROTECTED WATER I . P PIONEER PARK LAKE ST CROIX P/MDIR DN OP WATERS PROTECTEDWATER IIIP Location Map R_IW R3JW RI9W R_W R_IW R.WW Vicinity Map --$�-- _ 1 DEMARS SIGNS INC 7865520 10/28 '03 11 53 NO 797 02/02 4o CO o, 0 /ifIA INO 1 a 0 Received Time Oct [8 11 59AM "---ci. 1-rc---14-b---1-3T- if3- • • 8 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-100 Planning Commission Date December 8, 2003 Project Location 807 South Fifth Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Heidi and Chris Lottsfeldt Type of Application Variance Project Descnption A Variance to the front yard setback ( 30 feet required, 9 feet and 6 feet 6 inches requested) for the construction of a front porch and a portico Discussion The applicant is requesting a Vanance to the front yard setback to construct a front porch and a portico The front porch would be built on the northwest side of the house where there is a door into the kitchen The intended porch would not extend past the existing front of the house The portico would be constructed on the west side of the house (front) over an existing step It would not extend past the existing step Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The addition shall be similar in architectural style, material and color as the existing structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings PLANNING ADMINIS I RATION APPLICATION FORA)] COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Pert )C Vanance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amend Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this apphcat,on *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineenng fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting maten submitted In connection with any apphcat►on All supporting material (0 e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies o supporting material is required A site plan is required with apphcat►ons Any incomplete apphcat► supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project '3o - - Q--)ct..- Sm� Zoning District Description of Project Assessor's Parcel No -030 '2 I Z-(DO (G • Code) r etcionlr- ,f+11.0 41-) ?M\^ VICXtSe "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I t ill comp, the permit if it is granted and used " Property Ownei['r IS - E1 Mailing Address -)-- S 5�- City - State - Zip \k\\L &\-4,ip mN S b9)Z Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Representative 4-000 Mailing Addre City - Stated Zi • Telephone � M041 14 Signature 0\1 (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area Existing Height of Buildings Principal Accessory Feet H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 square fe€ square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet r\a- h` No of off-street parking spacesc.).„.t c-44- \"‘L*".'ilivo r WV— 1 111 fun) >/ 016 Yr IL_ 0073) 50 130 � 140 �1w1 110 181 0— .e 4---rvr A6 5„ 4R 30 3 pa3A BB 1 8 IF03 ) r 120 I 1 3 7 135 135 31 135 8 V e gaze) 1 30 1ss 13s 9 S 13s 29 1'a) e 135 135 0 0 28 04 g 135 11 . 135 9 27 ) 135 12 V 135 I 1 S�2 �1 135 . 25 135 1) e 135 14 V 135 J 24 1 •� 1s R 135 4 135 g 23 15.3) R 135 135 7 g031) J 1�m2) 13s ?I / f�M 18 $ 22 1 1 53 19 ex.* $ 82 D o D m as $ 2E I so es 1 g 2,4 t gf-^1 27 g I----E I F35 100 9 7 ,30) 4131) 9 r 135 g 24 135 135 1 5 „ 135 $ 7s2137) An) $ 135 g 135 11 7 ���111 135 $ e _ 313.0 135 110 m) 9 Location Map 135 9 135 10. — ..I 6 0 60 75 402 13;1 135 23 60 2 0,039 135 10 2 80 135 27 fozo 135 4 135 26 4102 1 135 SSA 135 OW 25 135 ) 135 24 5 470 11 70an 135 135 23 gaA 8 gaaa) 135 9 000.1 135 10 135 20 0) 11 135 135 19 fp A 1 135 135 18 135 13 135 17 f0 ) 14 135 135 16 135 28 135 27srso 5o 13) 135 135 OW/ 135 5 135 135 23 135 61 5) 135 do 34) 1 27 135 135 21 135 4p53) 481.0 135 9., 7) 135 135 10 60 30 135 2 71) 35 2� 135 2'pa) 135 25 135 2#0571 135 135 22 2 135 5) 20 135 1 135 135 35 135 27 es) 135 26 135 25 00m) 135 2�017) 115 23 comas) 135 135 2 135 a•) 20 135 1wan) R)W R'0W RIIW R—W Rlw RAW Vicinity Map 0 146 Scale in Feet 11s. a.., a FM. d cod .1„ ang smInAncel al WV nea.eM ,50 mam +oman mem.. r. Wore. .y wngm eCasty Maws „r.msr rA w.1.a.nCount, e.,d.Or. Pew (m )410601 f,rod data Mud en •9410 wee..n 14e.t.t tte..e_ 0.3m3 t-Y s _g S j9 t - c y - i 0 .. _,I , B C " 6 E S s j� °off � - C. c u 0 ®. 6)' e ') ° .-• a ° LL --? 0 d 45 .). J d 1 L- r g 4- 25) ° § -.2 (1) j:.---- " -1 Li._° 4c. 3 Fcq -6 t j ..Li- c su- c 41‘i) ' 0 0 Jd --5 c) 2 2 C c) --?_D-4)(-4-e 0 t_, v 1/4'--d_T-i, ,) c 9) , •) J --- (3--c 1 - ,g-g ,..,0_,_„..,..5.),), 6 —_.:7-)L,,F-)c)c-,. ), ),) --2, ,3 -0) )8,u, _,_ , vj�s_ 8,, 5 g & 9) 2 Vig t "1 e: Z.) cd i .-- -t-i'-.;Lj-.L .) 2 2 6 d 8- 3 "ci- - C c,g,: 4.) 3 S o d � o �- S -P .;)c ?. „4_ 6, 8 _c _i nct e-, c = 7 1- /3\ <egt, fbeeik --- -- toet Lsi frovy,„ put. t cc. •--1 crq' Crow\ hous-c, '1••Flt,t., E.:its1).Vb• Fwvikt, pLotilif6D7 ftdibA ...mo••••••••••••ea•••••••=•••••••• • • -- • --• • . • 1 +- 1 •c-71-1557 I -4115 PW4N) RZ,F tk.A.Q 2• % LQJE. Leva_ tb-i v.) 1JeVet. 4-• :•Atz•nt.)-(2 LefeK Leqe1.- • ElLiellt4& WEE0T riz4m013 (o-aNagivo -t.tr,tik-_ixeitzttetA i•axts-rozo vier eLENIAT700 e"-alcis-Thxv_ •xliTh 151001-1141 FanzMcr4 RAO Wol Legt— F* k • UPFEICkzEl, PLA,4 t. VIF7T ELEVA11or-1 ttik114 avArner0 14-* ET EA-L.4..71014 t7. 4004 e_EVAlltri3 (Cpciioy F I cp.-T-10,4S / M `r r r { r i (au �a 4 , r 4 r-� 4- w•••••"P r f- - w CD N w 7,,Formd5r, 5`rn-Lwa , M►�t , r i TOMTEN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 41 Judd Stv..t Map'na an St G.ari MN 55047 0272 I- 14 E 1 1 i 1 firiatkimais L.T 14tc. irni' ' 14nuAdAr 1 IJ TOMTEN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 41 JuLl Street Marne on St Go. MN 55047 0272 Z. 1 I r ►T� �+�� 'jr a..1E?4TICM5 'Ta Haw L4rrizarxr f 4c t G- r 40T. , o1 wAT , MN 1OMTTN ENVIRONMI N1AL DESIGN 41 J.41 Straot Margo St Cro,. MN 55047 0272 W -NNW, RIM Foc1r4& - V T #-4 Op, L D foxc# R)ST 2-2(6 TY1.t� FUTURE Fr.AN(M tROO FLOMPINCoi Rota W µ Fu1E '(D N©R1+4 WAU. 1. 9°z"cai tfgrC,?CE J it IJEW �GcEsS -p 2•8 GONSTILUCTN Cenh-TAucf70rJ ONEVEI 1 Fere-ri-.41,4 biu.v. Def.ic- • LI U1� D►►JiuC� 91f2"LPss eIL, `OC LSe, filoo1nY9 uPfet Lela t_aw.Y 12� — 1y EXU GONG GrooP O G Ui NeWot4510a10•1 VagEN !i 1 ri 4 ti Z-t.-rc 7= l b N Tom- o. %-rc 44 1C° 41.E IF/ D1e—Fl PL*t l 80 c� _J NEW Cor►ST 12 x d5 arsIRI)orIONI 19C0 EXIsT11 61?+-1t3 LEttEL. SZ'S 4EW T T L WI+1.i LPL 11Olog-41 131174 L.-mac W.446 'ROL be) e 1•AMl1 LEVEL. "CM-Mr/4 z :z � z Q � F Jf U r z z 0 c z p C 0 • 0 10 10 (46i 4-1 F L ADI'TII. 45 f AL?VATIOWS To aigle Alti- IDI LonuDTD �- �'1 SCUM R F 14 'T `TII..UA1ATE,e MI.1 u tIN 1OMTI=N ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 41 JuJJ Street Mar neon St C o MN 55047 0272 AQDrnot 15 4.606KATIale ir) L.+49.0 f E.0 i L.61 5FEu rr i l3c- 501 gates 1.11.1 1OMTTN ENVIRONMCNTAL DESIGN 41 Judd Street Mar ne o St Cro MN 55047 0272 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/V/03-102 Planning Commission Date December 8, 2003 Project Location 418 Holcombe Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential District Zoning District RB Applicants Name Brian Enright Type of Application Special Use Permit and Variance Project Description A request for a special use permit and setback variance for construction of an accessory dwelling unit in second level of existing garage Discussion The proposed site is located in the Duplex Residential District, RB, (see attached dwelling regulations) Accessory dwelling units are allowed in the RB District if certain development criteria are met One of the criteria calls for the accessory d welling unit to meet the primary use setback requirements For the RB District, a 25 foot rear yard setback and a 10 foot side yard setback is required The garage currently exists and has storage on the 2' level The existing garage meets garage setbacks but not accessory dwelling unit setbacks The size of the proposed accessory dwelling is 542 square feet within the 800 square foot maximum allowed No unique site circumstances are apparent or presented to make findings for approval The Heritage Preservation Commission did approved the design of the existing garage Recommendation Denial - the proposal does not meet setback requirements for an accessory dwelling unit Attachments Application and plans PLANNING ADMINISTF (ION APPLICATION FORM iY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No V SvOa3—o ACT ON REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit . Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete apphcation or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project k-V'c _tot3e �-`— Zoning District Description of ProjectT� t r\i U�3o *O (� O dq e) cU&_ Q , Assessor's Parcel No ?ff 2 0e Z "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct / further certify I will comply wit! the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner %rE N e t}- � Representative Mailing Address 14 tK Mailing Addre City - State - Zip S-rt LL_W p� � itA k} SSC60-City - Stat Telephone No (1SI - ?,(7 - 3C1� &Sl� / —Ye Signature ignatur' is r=' uired) Lot Size (dimepsions) x Land Area i , kcx _ Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal 32OO AccessoryU Telephone Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces nature is required) H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 11 10 b 6 9 a � 8 5 7 6 q 5 0.4 due 'Fos.) WEBSTERS ADDITION 50 20 30 50 50 50 60 10 8 9F. Nr 50 TO TILLWP TER 6 e7 6 A 5 0.3* F.2) 122 61 8 �n 04.) RD N P SCHULTZ 25 0.4 FIVE 0 25 0 8 3 ow) 70 3 y 9 2 .375 2 g r 122 0.4 O N 51 9 ACRE 10 40n1)e (0053) )D I ON TO T 9 51 86 HIE CITY 0 13035 50 ,�, 1— Ct 302 ttJ �r�co F- 130 1 130 7D79 19 s 4 f0 ) 122 5 2 32 93 60 4 51 88 6125 2 ® m) 1 f— re 50 60 3 0.) 122 STIT L .WA 52 1502 2 w ER APPARENT GAP 122 9 a a 50 33 a 150 3 50 Q7 8 60 33 1 5033 10 4, n 1 DN 6 502 1 502 5 6➢0I 50 33 1 5033 150 6 5 �1 9 4 0sd) 3 602 4 g 100 ®33 e 01 1 � 11 0 19 2 0 3) 12 150 1 150 O 5 I(�106) to is 25 72-� 25 25 m 2 0 U J 0 25 t- 0 30 30 sot 10 is9 ) 15 14 w , s .2) TKO 1� ) 1 13 12 60 50 M„ 50 TIO i Aso 6 (sow) 11 10 4,00 40100 50 6o 9 4, 75 WEST WILLARD S ro i4----,4----,6 60 6 60 - 10 r^ 60 00 00 00 30 30 47 120 i.+�f 20 H g 1�7' 40 10 "1 i+T 4...4-.f 0 W Location Map A R _ e _ 5 SS a _ Sl 3 _ 2 R - ode)0, 1 - 9 7 �,® 6 5 ,,,dim. 4 3 2 1 Isom ILIW RSOW R19W 1L_W R_IW R2OW Vicinity Map 0 154 Scale in Feet nW w1..y 8.no. a -m .,e1.4.0sIket NWOW rr mete telw 11 0 S9 Oe.amc P.wemq Wtemphai Canty neau¢n b q mete Saxe Wtel.pen Cou178wxVn OP an. 0.424 teP.m.14 SOW Enright 418 Holcombe Street Stillwater, MN I would like to bnng water and sewer from my main house into my detached garage The purpose for this action is to install a sub sink in the garage, and potentially a future bathroom above the garage in the playroom q, d -1 t i (Ay, +`- 1- On L j SL, tkvl ace Qc_ co f y o f' -2_ C C"Q aiptr) b {\-C c tic < Cn d L,Q .0. 1 L-0 7412 e 1oc- 6 4 -CT = `f2 r � , C& \1 a.bo oe. o cArre -Q - ytm 0-bcAs 14s �1 (&i) —L (N/Pt — NOT eA i g Vs. h Nor @d kJ(Q+frt( 91-t'Lri CA_ V\ 1 CA V1,` - 11 R 10 dFoor 40 50 10 8 6.4 5I 8 3 1 5 7 5 6 Om) ? 5 WEBSTE3S ADDITION 20 TO SIILLWA 2 6 dol.) 1 a 57 60 3 6 :) TE 5 .2021 12 150 25 25 .r. 2 9P3) 1 150 0 30 30 0 50 WEST WILLARD S 50 10 i�f 50 0 O 50 LEI 5S 6 S1 Ou09 5 1 50 S1 4- 50 4.----1 3 51 00 i�l 2 R Wm) 50 30 30 - Q �yl I 20 0 2 b dm) 0 1 Location Map , 7 6 5 5) 4 3 _DSQ^ R_IW R'a1W RI9W R_ W R_IW R20W Vicinity Map 0 154 Scale In Feet d. Ma rvea�e = �s��a �s. war �- n TM arem use1 for mimeo nmestar gYms - W <be.. Sun,.Oaks .b.In I 004,17 veal... tend a am. Dos* =eO.s* ap. e•.a tom kr.en..0 wmeex as Main House Enright 418 Holcombe Street Apx 1/2 acre 6 ' to lot/Ine " -9, f IL( II 11 3Y i 11'x14' 1 J 5 JJ /2 z 1y 3 v /s ,)", -- 7, 23 12'x19Y2' 11'x14' Enright 418 Holcombe Street Although NOT to scale measurements are accurate interior square footage 542 sq ft HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM CASE NO DR/03-76 Hentage Preservation Date December 1, 2003 Project Location 418 Holcombe Street Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential District Zoning Distnct RB Applicant's Name Brian Enright Type of Application Design Review Project Descnption Design review of an accessory dwelling unit Discussion The applicant is requesting design review of an existing garage that would have the upper floor converted into an accessory dwelling unit A Vanance from the Planning Commission is being requested by the applicant at the December 8, 2003 Commission meeting The ordinance for dwelling units states that the unit must have the same setbacks as the primarysstructure,which existing 25 foot structure srsetback and 6 feet from the�ea�andt or l0% of 6 feet lot width for the side setback from the side property line Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the project, staff suggests the following condition of approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission Attachments. Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Photos 1-1 VC, PI) G11 b 1•i ' (i to 3 -)' .--13 • ,e5 20/7/7- ZONING Subd 12 RB two family district RB two fam- ily distncts shall be regulated as follows (1) Permitted buildings and uses In the RB two family district the following buildings and uses and their accessory buildings and uses are permitted a All buildings and uses permitted in the RA -one -family district as set forth m subdivision 11(1) of this section b Dwelling houses, each occupied by not more than two families c Type I home occupation use permits (2) Permitted uses with special use permits In the RB two-family district, the follow - mg buildings and uses and their acces- sory buildmgs and uses may be permitted by special use permit from the city coun cil a Type II, home occupation permits b Multi -family dwellings c Reserved (3) Accessory uses In the RB district uses and buildings mcidental to permitted or spe cial permitted uses shall be subject to the following regulations a The maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings including at tached and detached pnvate garages and other accessory buildings shall be 1,000 square feet or ten percent of the lot area, whichever is less b The total ground coverage of the accessory buildings shall not exceed the ground coverage of the pnncipal building c No more than two accessory build mgs, one pnvate garage and one other accessory building, 120 square feet maximum, shall be located on a residential premises § 31 1 d An accessory building shall not be designed or used for human habita ton b . ' - or industrial acces accessory as a second dwell ing um • . ne lot, detached from a pn mary single-family residence and clearly secondary to a primary residence Acces- sory dwelling units are permitted special uses in the RB district suibject to the following regulations a Lot size must be at least 10,000 square feet, b The accessory dwelling unit may be located on second floor above the garage c e accessory dwelling unit must abide by the primary structure set backs for side and rear setbacks, accessory dwelling unit • . • e located m e rear yard of the pn mary residence or be set back from the front of the lot beyond the mid- point of the primary residence, e Off-street parking requirements for an apartment and single-family res- idence (four spaces) must be pro vided, f Maximum size of the accessory dwell mg unit is 800 square feet, g The application requires design re- view for consistency with the pn mary unit in design, detailing and materials, h The height may not exceed that of the pnmary residence, and i Both the primary and accessory dwell mg unit must be connected to munic- ipal sewer and water services and be located on an unproved public street Supp No 13 CD31 16 5 S. T // r PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-101 Planning Commission Date December 8, 2003 Project Location Between 1419 and 1323 West Ramsey Street Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Tom Larson Type of Application Variance Project Descnption A Vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet requested) and to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 20 feet requested) for the construction of a residence Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to the front and rear yard setback to construct a single family home The use proposed is single family residential, consistent with zoning use requirements A Variance was granted by the Planning Commission for the size of the lot at the June 3, 2003 meeting (see case No SUB/03-36) The required lot size in the RA zoning district is 10,000 square feet This lot is nonconforming because it is only 7500 square feet It is also wider in length (100 feet) than in depth (75 feet), another contnbuting factor to its' nonconformity If a house were to be constructed on the land and follow the required setbacks, it would have a depth of 20 feet In making a building permit recommendation to the City Council, the Planning Commission should consider the following items -Compliance of the building and use with zoning and land use regulations -Conformance of the design of the house with the existing or future pattern of development in the neighborhood to which the building would be built Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval 1 The design of the house should be compatible with the neighborhood Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a vanance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan/Elevation Drawing PLANNING ADMINISTF i ION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process 2 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project l<3# ill5ey. St Assessor's Parcel No Nett) io-f Zoning District RA Description of Project Va %/ Q lard se-Ehac k GEO Code / iY t r "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify I will comply witl the permit if it is granted and used " Ilib v�rk Property Owner s 1,1„, Representative C1,y,y,12._ Mailing Address % 5 p p W of:;.) i \,R__ Mailing Address City - State - Zip S- -,\.t \•',' SSc Z City - State - Zip Telephone No.(c / -'f3D 3 lj )' 4i) %-7 i9O Telephone No SignatureSignature (Signature Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed square feet Principal Paved Impervious Area square feet Accessory No of off-street parking spaces SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIO Total Building flo• ark square feet Existing square feet H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 11/21/03 Members ot the Planning Commission, We are wrrtmg 10 request a variance to the front yard set back (30 ft required 23 ft requested) and_the rear yard seLback (25_ ft required 19 ft requested) Between 1419 and 1323 west Ramsey (a newly created lot) for the construction ofa new home With the front yard set back ot 30 ft and the rear set back of 25 ft that only leaves 20 ft Our hope with the variance is to build a new house that will further enhance the beauty of west Ramsey and the surrounding area Thank you tor your consideration Cross RwerBuilders, 11 c Thomas Larson managing,,a nt 0 o -'0 N .E 6 d 3 ?1- AIL •,,,,,,,e. " ,,,,, IMIMP.- INF • ANEW ',7',, -'• " -- 41."..;; •,..4. ''',;.; .,';',.. vAr.• •••:,,, . t • •/#4e. /..... ',..? IIIMIL,e1Mr 'i. '11-=-11., 't 111M1WeAce.." .11= dfe,,,,,, - •••••• caf, 100011111 11.111 I ...p.'"•••••• , !. • • tro • , • . pip • oisraist ' 11.11 111 I so It s. 11111111111111111 1111411 Den Living Area Plan Designed For Sioping Lot { ,ari"'fi ' � k �✓ trt, "' n s+-.: a .c.C�+Yx{' '4"-a po is `fit" t Ir e:4 :�.'kt x "h ,4 • tfr fr- =S' i t y4 } Fht ek-3( .ma �, Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date December 4, 2003December 4, 2003 Subject Boutwell Traffic Study Based on the Boutwell Transportation Study Meeting of November 17, 2003, you may have questions regarding the report recommendations If you have data or information needs, they can be discussed at the Commission meeting and the information provided for your December18, 2003 Boutwell Transportation Study Meeting ,1A;St ,A4.44.t