Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-06-09 CPC Packetiliwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, June 9, 2003, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of May 12, 2003 AGENDA 1 Case No V/03-49 A variance to the sign regulations (one allowed, two requested) located at 1200 West Frontage Road in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Koppy Motors, applicant 2 Case No V/03-50 A variance to the front yard fence height regulations (42" allowed, 60" proposed) at 828 West Willard Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Joe Thompson, applicant 3 Case No V/03-51 A variance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 5 feet requested) for the construction of an addition above an existing attached garage at 504 West St Croix Avenue in the RB, Two Family Residential District David P Ponath, applicant 4 Case No V/03-53 A variance to the street side yard setback (30 feet required, 11' 10" requested) for the construction of a two car attached garage located at 1101 South Fourth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Michael and Jennifer Peltier, applicants 5 Case No SUP/03-54 A special use permit for outdoor sales for 10-days located at 1801 Market Drive (CUB Parking Lot) in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Eric Robbins, applicant 6 Case No V/03-55 A variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 10 feet requested) for the construction of a three season porch and deck located at 1311 North Third Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Tom and Linda Furst, applicants 7 Case No SUB-F/03-56 Preliminary and final plat approval request for a 7 lot subdivision including two outlots as follows Lot 1 Blk 1 - 37,055 square feet, Lot 1 Blk 2 - 36,052 square feet, Lot 2 Blk 2 - 62,779 square feet, Lot 3 Blk 2 - 37,405 square feet, Lot 1 Blk 3 - 48,474 square feet, Outlot A - 107,559 square feet and Outlot B - 116,809 square feet located at 608 North Main in the CBD, Central Business District Terra Springs, LLC, applicant CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 8 Case No ZAM/03-03 A zoning map amendment to rezone 10 lots located along 62nd Street North from AP, Agricultural Preservation to LR, Lakeshore Residential Kevin and Roxanne Shoeberg, applicants 9 Case No SUB/03-61 A subdivision of a 3 03 acres lot into four lots of Lot 1- 40,946 square feet, Lot 2 - 26,000 square feet, Lot 3 - 26,000 square feet, Lot 4 - 26,000 square feet located at 12730 62nd Street North in the LR, Lakeshore Residential District Kevin and Roxanne Shoeberg, applicants 10 Case No V/03-57 A variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required, 20 feet requested) for the construction of a garage located at 603 West Churchill Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Scott and Lisa DeMars, applicants 11 Case No V/03-58 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 16 feet requested) for the construction of a entry overhang located at 607 West Myrtle Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Michelle St Claire, applicant 12 Case No V/03-59 A variance to the front yard setback (20 feet required, 11 feet requested) and to the side yard setback (6 feet required, 5' 6" requested) for the construction of a front porch located at 522 West Oak Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Mark Balay, applicant 13 Case No V/03-60 A variance to the front yard setback (15 feet required, 11 feet requested) for the construction of a porch addition to existing building at 106 E Chestnut in the CBD, Central Business District Mark Balay, applicant 14 Case No SUP/03-62 A special permit to conduct over the counter outside sale of pizza north of 241 North Main (Marx Wine Bar and Grill) in the CBD, Central Business District Mark Hanson, applicant Other Items CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Chairperson Hultman called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m Present Commissioners Gag, Hultman, Middleton, Peroceschi, Ranum, Turnquist, Teske and Council Representative Junker Others Community Development Director Russell APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Council Representative Junker to approve the March 17, 2003 and April 14, 2003 commission minutes Motion carried unanimously Case No SUP/03-26 A special use permit for a mini storage facility located in the Business Park Industrial District, BP -I on the southeast corner of Curve Crest Blvd and Industrial Blvd Steve Gaffney, applicant (Continued from the March 17, 2003 meeting) Mr Gaffney requested a special use permit for a mini -storage complex located on the southeast corner of Industrial Boulevard and Curve Crest Boulevard The site is 1 13 acres Impervious surface will cover approximately 25,126 square feet or 51 % of the property The use is for a self -storage facility that will have six buildings with individual units ranging from 40 to 300 square feet The buildings will have a "prairie" style design on the perimeter buildings using stucco and cedar The site will be fenced using a combination of the proposed structure's and ornamental iron fencing There will be a security gate with a user specific entry code combined with a video security system The landscape plan shows a combination maple, crab apple and junipers It is staffs suggestion that willow trees are planted along the most eastern building, by the retaining pond The willows will soften the space between the pond and the buildings Lighting in the site will consist of shoebox pole lighting and downlit wall paks There is no trash receptacle since this business doesn't generate trash The signage will consist of a wall sign on the corner on the northeast corner of Curve Crest Blvd and Industrial It will be bronze colored individual lettering saying "Prairie Winds of Stillwater" It will not be lit Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Ranum to approve the special use permit for a mini storage facility located in the Business Park 1 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Industrial District, BP-1 on the southeast corner of Curve Crest Boulevard and Industrial Boulevard with the following conditions 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 No snow, in winter, shall be deposited in the pond 3 Provide Engineering with water quality ponds 4 All security lighting shall be downlit 5 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 6 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 7 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 8 A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles 9 All security lighting shall be downlit 10 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 11 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 12 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 13 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during construction activity 14 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 15 Willow trees shall be planted along the building at the end of the site closest to the retaining pond 16 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 17 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 18 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 19 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 20 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Heritage Preservation Commission 2 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Motion passed unanimously Case No ZAM/03-02 A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 West Olive Street Jeff and Gina Melstrom and Tim and Jodi Larson, applicants Mr Melstrom and Mr Larson requested rezoning two lots from, RA, Single Family to RB, Duplex Residential The required square footage for RA is 10,000 The required square footage for RB is 7,500 The rezoning would allow the applicants to split their lots to create a total of three lots The applicants stated that a duplex would not be built on the third lot only a Single Family home The existing use and zoning for the entire area surrounding the proposed rezoning site is Single Family Residential This request represents spot zoning that is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or good zoning practice Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Teske to deny the Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 West Olive Street Motion fails 4 fore, 4 against Case No SUB/03-36 A subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District Jeff and Gina Melstrom, applicants Since the motion for Case No ZAM/03-02 failed This item was not discussed Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to deny subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street Motion passed 5 fore, 3 against Case No V/03-38 A variance to the front yard setbacks (corner lot) (30 feet required, 9' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at 1010 4th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential Distract Billy J Elliot, applicant Mr Elliot requested a variance to the front yard setbacks for the construction of a roof deck The lot and the house are non -conforming The lot is 3,208 square feet, 7,500 square feet is the minimum allowed for the Two Family zoning district The house has been built within the required setbacks and is very close to the corner Adding a roof deck would increase the house mass, therefore creating a greater imposition on the 3 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 street The house, shed, and concrete surfaces are greater than the approved maximum 30 % impervious surface coverage of a lot adding more to the non -conformity of the lot The highest point on the home would be 24 feet tall There would be no lights on the deck Commissioner Teske was not comfortable with the variance because is would increase the mass of the house Motion made by Commissioner Teske, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to deny the variance to the front yard setbacks (corner lot) (30 feet required, 9' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at 1010 4th Street North Motion passed 5 fore, 3 against Case No V/03-39 A variance to the front yard setbacks (30 feet required, 29' 6" requested) for the construction of an entry overhang located at 317 North Sherburne Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Jay and Teresa Libby, applicants Mr and Mrs Libby requested a variance to the front yard setback for the construction of an entry overhang There is an issue with the existing steps They need to be widened, as they exist they are too narrow to enter the house easily when the front door is opened, you have to step back down the steps to get around the open door The steps are also icy in the winter with melting roof snow re -freezing on the steps Mr and Mrs Libby feel that it would be much safer if a roof overhang covered them A majority of the houses on the street are closer to Sherburne Street than the applicant's house would be If the applicants construct the overhang entry, they would be seven feet closer to Sherburne Street, making the new setback 29'6" Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Teske to approve the variance to the front yard setbacks (30 feet required, 29' 6" requested) for the construction of an entry overhang located at 317 North Sherburne Street with the following conditions 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 The addition shall be similar in architecture, colors and materials as the existing main structure 4 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-40 A variance to the side yard setback, 10 feet required, 2 feet proposed and a variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 17 feet proposed) for the construction of a new basement access located at 309 East Willow Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District Daniel Kalmon, applicant Mr Kalmon requested a variance to the side yard setback and a variance to the front yard setback for the construction of a new basement access On September 9, 2002, Mr Kalmon received a variance from the Planning Commission to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 18 feet requested) to construct a new foundation The house is built below the street elevation and is having drainage problems The new foundation will place the house at or about street level, thus eliminating drainage problems On February 10, 2003, Mr Kalmon received a variance to the side yard setback to construct a enclosed stairway to the new basement Access to the basement is presently through an outside door on the back, south side of the house Currently the house sits 4 feet from the property line on the west side Mr Kalmon stated in his letter that the west side of the house is the only option as the east side has a driveway and a retaining wall The street limits the north side and the south side of the house has the septic tank directly behind the house Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Council Representative Junker to approve the variance to the side yard setback, 10 feet required, 2 feet proposed and a variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 17 feet proposed) for the construction of a new basement access located at 309 East Willow Street with the following conditions 1 All revisions to the approved project shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director 2 The enclosed stairway structure shall be similar in style, materials and colors as the main structure Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-41 A variance to the rear yard setback (5 feet required, 3' 1" requested) for construction of a two car garage with storage above located at 1323 2nd Street South in the RB, Two Family Residential District David and 5 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Jeanne Kensler, applicants Mr and Mrs Kensler requested a variance to the rear yard setback for the construction of a two car garage with storage above The existing one car garage is in disrepair and needs to be demolished A variance is needed because of the location of the house The house is situated too close for anyone to back out of the garage safely Beside the house there is a tree, a fence and a wall that could also obstruct access to the north parking stall John Leonard, was concerned about the changes of character to the back yard Mr Leonard is fine with the width of the garage, but he is concerned about the height of the garage He was also concerned about the increase drainage on his property Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Ranum to approve the variance to the rear yard setback (5 feet required, 3' 1" requested) for construction of a two car garage with storage above located at 1323 2nd Street South with the following conditions 1 The garage shall be similar in architectural style, materials and color as the existing house 2 All revisions to the approved project shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director 3 Gutters on the garage shall keep drainage on owner's property Motion fails 4 fore, 4 against Case No SUP/03-42 A special use permit request for retail sale of fresh cut flowers and associated merchandise located at 222 South Third Street in RCM, Medium Family Density District Bob Estelle, applicant Mr Estelle requested a Special Use Permit for retail sale of fresh cut flowers and associated merchandise Mr Estelle is an importer/broker of fresh cut flowers It is his intent to sell flowers handles by his firm as "quality check" at this location The business will be small, not a "full service" retail flonst Since inventory will be limited, hours of operation will be limited The hours of operation might be Tuesday through Saturday from 12 00 p m to dinnertime This will be a cash and carry operation There will be no deliveries Signage will be included in the existing signage on the budding Mr Estelle requested a "sandwich board" sign to be used occasionally The sign ordinance 6 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 does not permit these temporary signs Mr Estelle thought that the "sandwich board" sign would help regulate traffic Three 7ft by 9 ft flowerbeds will be planted with seasonal plans These beds will be located at the entrance of the building Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the special use permit request for retail sale of fresh cut flowers and associated merchandise located at 222 South Third Street with the following conditions 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 No additional signage 3 No "sandwich board" signage Motion passed 7 fore, 1 against Case No SUP/03-43 A special use permit (use determination) for an off ice hockey facility located at 2000 Industrial Blvd in the BP -I Business Park Industrial District Jennifer Cates representing Cates Construction, applicant Ms Cates requested a use determination for use of a portion +25% of an existing industrial building for a recreation facility The recreational facility would be a "hockey gym" It would be an off ice training facility for young adults and youth The training center is designed to give youth the equipment and time to improve their hockey skills The hours of operation would probably be longer during the summer The top portion of the building would be used as office space The application shows a parking lot with 41 parking spaces The total building size is approximately 9,000 square feet The required number of parking spaces is 45 The parking lot is in poor condition and parking spaces are not marked With marking, additional spaces could be provided Russ, DSR, inquired about the traffic flow Ms Cates informed him that she does not believe that there will be an increase in traffic Parents will drop their children off and come back a couple hours later to pick up the kids Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Teske to approve the special use permit (use determination) for an off ice hockey facility located at 2000 Industrial Boulevard with the following conditions CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 1 The parking lot shall be resurface and parking spaces marked by August 1, 2003 Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-44 A variance to the sign regulations for the placement of two signs, a wall and a pylon sign at 14430 North 60th Street in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Lisa Meyer representing Edina Realty, Inc , applicant The applicant requested a variance for a second sign for Edina Realty The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed and approved the building plans and a wall sign at the January 6, 2003 meeting The second sign proposed is a 25 foot high internally lit pylon sign The face of the sign would be 8 feet by 12 feet The size is permitted within the sign ordinance for this zoning district It would have a red background with white copy, similar to their logo The sign cabinet would be painted black The applicant stated that the building sits back from Highway 36 and a pylon sign would make them more visible to the traffic on 36 Shall also commented on the many business that have a wall sign and a pylon sign along the corridor She did not feel it would be fair to deny Edina Realty a pylon sign when there are several in that area already Motion made by Commissioner Teske, seconded by Commissioner Ranum to deny the variance to the sign regulations for the placement of two signs, a wall and a pylon sign at 14430 North 60th Street Motion passed 5 fore, 3 against Case No V/03-45 A variance to the side and rear yard setbacks (5 feet required, 0 feet requested) for the construction of a detached garage located at 111 West Cherry Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Mike and Venee Russ, applicants Mr and Mrs Russ requested no setback for the construction of a two stall garage Mr and Mrs Russ would like to build a two stall garage on the rear and side property lines The residence currently has a one stall tuck under garage With no setback drainage, fire protection and air and light to adjoining properties becomes and issue Commissioner Middleton informed the applicants that they would not have access to the back and side of the garage because it is not their property He is against zero lot lines and recommends denial 8 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Dwayne Secrest, 408 North 3`d Street was against the construction of the garage because it would obstruct his view, the impervious surface would be increased and there would be additional run off Owner, 408 North 3rd Street, felt that it is not in the best interest of their property to have the garage built She would like an environmental study done on the water runoff Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Gag to deny the variance to the side and rear yard setbacks (5 feet required, 0 feet requested) for the construction of a detached garage located at 111 West Cherry Street Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-46 A variance for a second story above a two stall garage for an art studio located at 921 1st Street South in the RB, Two Family Residential District Ronald and Jennifer LaMone, applicants Applicant was not present at the meeting The issue with the construction with a second story on the garage is that sometime in the future someone could install water and sewer It is against the zoning ordinance to have a habitable space at 5 feet from the property line A member of the audience requested to speak about the issue Elizabeth Ludkey, 215 East Churchill Street is against the construction of the second story on the garage She stated that a survey has not been done on the property The construction would affect the value of her home and she doesn't think the second story would be used as an art studio Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to deny the variance for a second story above a two stall garage for an art studio located at 921 1st Street South Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-47 A variance to the front yard fence height regulations (42" allowed, 45" to 6' proposed) at 1109 4th Street So in the RB, Two Family Residential District Judy Ferrell, representing Jeanne Anderson applicant Ms Ferrell requested a variance to the fence height regulations The property has an existing 45" white picket fence The rest of the fence is tapered on either side and eventually realigns with the existing 45' fence The main reason for the variance is for aesthetic purposes 9 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Motion made by Commissioner Peroceschi, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the variance to the front yard fence height regulations (42" allowed, 45" to 6' proposed) at 1109 4th Street South with the following conditions 1 All revisions to the approved project shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director Motion passed unanimously Case No PUD/03-48 Final Planned Unit Development, Long Lake Estates Phase II, for 14 townhomes (three buildings) located on Parkwood Lane in TH, Townhouse Residential District St Croix Development, applicant Mark Gossman gave a brief overview of the final PUD He shared color samples with the Commission A member of the audience stated that he was pleased with the design and he would like some reassurance about street improvements by the developer Another member of the audience did not know that the project was sold She would like to meet with the new developer Greg Wind, 6322 Stillwater, brought up his issue with his driveway It had not been resolved by the former developer Mr Gossman showed Mr Wind a map that showed that the pond had been moved and his driveway is no longer in jeopardy Mr Wind was satisfied with the solution Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Commissioner Teske to approve the Final Planned Unit Development, Long Lake Estates Phase II, for 14 townhomes (three buildings) located on Parkwood Lane with the following conditions OTHER ITEMS Review and approval of Tax Increment District #10 The city is currently amending its Tax Increment District to help with the redevelopment of the downtown area 10 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 12, 2003 Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approval the TIF District as consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown Plan Motion passed unanimously Discussion of results of Joint Oak Park Heights/Stillwater Planning Commission Hwy 36 Alternatives The Commission recommended that lower elevation, lower speed limit and plan F be brought to City Council Review of revised elevation for Settler's Glen 2nd Addition The Settler's Glen developer proposed to modify the approved house design to accommodate more three stall garages The City is concerned with the appearance of the three stall garages The garages should be recessed or turned and only two stalls viewed from the street Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the revised elevation for Settler's Glen 2nd Addition Motion passed 5 fore, against ADJOURNMENT Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Teske to adjourn the meeting at 9 30 p m Motion passed unanimously Respectfully Submitted, Bobbi Mortvedt Recording Secretary 11 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CAST NO V/03-49 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 1200 West Frontage Road Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicants Name William Minder, representing Koppy Motors Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the sign regulations (one sign allowed, two requested) Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to install an additional sign on the front of the building The sign ordinance states that all commercial office and industnal signs in all BP distncts are subject to the following conditions one wall, freestanding, awning or canopy is permitted The business currently has a 4 foot by 8 foot freestanding pylon sign The proposed wall sign would read "Koppy Motors" in 18" high yellow letters, a total of 32 square feet The sign would be mounted across the front of the building above the entry and would not be lit The Planning Commission imposed eight conditions of approval on this use when it became an auto lot (5/10/99), these conditions stay with the use until they are amended or a Vanance is given The conditions are 1 The design conditions in the West Business Park Design Guidelines must be met 2 No elevated cars 3 All lot lighting shall be directed downward 4 No flag banners 5 No exterior amplification 6 No parking cars on the Frontage Road 7 No more than fifteen cars for sale in front of the building 8 No sign on the building Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 2 All lighting shall be directed downward Application to work with staff on this issue 3 Either plyon or wall sign - which ever is approved by the Planning Commission - Heritage Preservation Commission approved design of each sign 4 No elevated cars 5 All lot lighting shall be directed downward 6 No flag banners 7 No extenor amplification 8 No parking cars on the Frontage Road 9 No more than fifteen cars for sale in front of the building Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings HPC Action — Approved the design of both signs presented +5-0 06/03/2003 18 32 6514309404 KOPPYMOTORSSTLWR PAGE 02 KOPPY MOTORS OF STILLWATER June 3, 2003 RE Signage Dear Sir/Madam Koppy Motors of Stillwater is requesting a variance to the sign regulation (one allowed) located at 1200 West Frontage Road m the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District The reasons are as follows 1) Our Competition has a sign more than twice the size of ours and it is also much taller, yet they have roughly the same size lot 2) Our Competitions building sits closer to the street for bctter visual exposute V S our building which has less of a visual presence due to the fact that it sits much flirther off the road Often times the customers will ask if we are part of our Competitors lot 3) We also are very close too and sit a bit back from the strip mall and get lost in all their signage We feel that if we could have our name on the front of our building as well as on the sign out front, that this would give us better identity for our facility and help us to even the Competition. Thank you for your consideration on this matter • William G Mind Koppy Motors of Stillwater PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION mu.. ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Case Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No (20 FEES Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/ Vanance $7 Resubdivision $100 Subdivision* $100+5C _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Planning Unit Development * $500 Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracyg ring fees submitted in connection with any application All supporting of all forms and supporting submitted with connection h becomesnyathe propertyePPorhes mat) material (� e, photos, sketches, etc) supporting material is required If application Isubmitted to eity of t/C City Council,llwater e w lve) 12 co lof e supporting material is requiredtwelve (12) copies o1 A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete appl,cat,on or supporting appl�cation process pport�ng material will deli PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project / • 06 � I't �1+`-assessor's Parcel No 2 �&: Zoning Distract P - C, `� ��%'�'� Description of Project V At? y,,,r` , s e _ (GEO Code) s �I • i "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evil respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further submitted herewith ii the permit if it is granted and used " certify I will comply Property Owner �'S��Cyoe %' 1�0/�.1 Mailing Address 6113 City - State - Zip Telephone No 6Cf 7 1 7- OS _ Signature (Signature Is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Pnncipal Accessory Feet H lmcnamaralshela1PLANAPP FRM Apnl 12 2002 Representative 'OPP(1 ` O-60Lc Mailing Address /aQO (1 4 - 4b IAF_ City - State - Zip l 1/iU K__ %% G50 Telephon - ► _ tr _ 9 QO Signatur required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces I. Page 1 of 1 18" high letters = total 32 sq ft tile. //C 1‘"DTDO`VS`L, 1p'LL'tcrs layout (1) jpg 4/28/03 r 0 0 m 0 m • B 1005 325 1 32523 28923 BLDG (0( 68(00115) CONDO NO 5 VIEW APTS 17553 a' wow $ 2922ij0N7amS '9 6 • - m ew00 g. a s a a 1 i g a 1 z 1 75 .00 125 V 1 .02 W 1 E 1W u.n 1WJ. 9 1 u B INDUSTRIAL VD • n FLY 14 1 e t- Zan BUD KE aW 591 AD ITION '- r i' a,n • 3 0 00 rJ IL 120 a _0 a m ISO a 1 4111 I Pritill gi i I 'II" leej Ul e1e39 • 0 4 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-50 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 828 Willard Street West Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Joe Thompson Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard fence height regulations (42" allowed, 60 requested) Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to the front yard setback to construct a 60 inch high fence The attached plan shows that the southwest corner of his garage is four feet back from the front of the house The applicant said it the attached letter that he could construct a fence that is greater than 42" in height as long as it extended four feet from the southwest corner of the garage into the front yard and it would not go past the front of the house This scenario has a setback, right where the fence would be installed is a large stand of trees Another reason the applicant wishes to install a 60" high fence instead of a 42" high fence is that he has a large dog that could jump over a fence of 42" A fence of the proposed magnitude would be imposing and impair the visual openness of the streetscape and neighborhood Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggests the following conditions of approval 1 All revisions to the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same distnct and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site/Letter from the Applicant/Site Plan 04„0s103 13 48 4308810 APR 30 2003 16 48 FR LINDGOJIST-UENNUM 143 P TO 2851#123123U0400 P 04/05 (,l I Y IJr ti..t—rer, Casa No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM Date Fto File e Paid Recelpt No. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 21, NORTH FOURTH STREET 811Li WATER, MN 05052 ACTION REQUESTED ,�pedal/Conditional Use Permit science RQ5Ubdivlsion , .SubdMilon' Comprehensive Plan Amendment _Zoning Amendment' —__Planning Unit De$5 velopment • 0 Certllkate of Compliance $ 70 FEES $501200 $70,200 $100 5100+60/1ot 'An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees. The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms end supporting material submitted In connection with any application. All supporting material (I e., photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stll!water. Sixteen (10) copies of supporting material /s required if application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material Is required A site plan is required with applications Any Incomplete application or supporting material will delay tl application process. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project SASS '1(War d 574 cod Asssssot's Parcel No4903A143 0/o 1-9 Zoning Dlstrlct 14 3 Description of Projec(��, t C $7/rvc `'' (e►-� Code)GEO — `I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith In al respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify/ will comply wh the permit If it is granted and used Property Owner �ce / yd,4rp S�►"� Malang Address .5ae._.b /6vc1.ST`c.4.) City - state - zip Sh/4A4 .echo 1s$ a___ Telephone No, 4 $l 351, O'rr7 S— Signature Lord (dimensions) `x Height of ci Buildings Stories Accessory Representative Mailing Address_ City - State - Telephone No Signature, red) (Signature Is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION (See 44-0.44, Total Building floor area , equaro feet EidatIng - w square feet Paved Proposed square feet Impervious Area — square feet No of off-street parldno specs Feet PtialielffnaligatidePlANAPP.IMM Ape 12, 20Q2 • APR 30 2003 16 48 FR LINDQUIST-VENNUM #3 P TO 2851#12312340400 P 02/05 JOE R. THOMPSON 828 W. VWILLARD STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 651-351-0475 ilill!Mm April 30, 2003 City of Stillwater Attention Sue 215 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Variance Request BY FACSIMILE Dear Sue Attached please find a Planning Administration Application Form for a variance to the front yard setback requirement for a fence Based on our conversations, it is my understanding that a fence may not exceed 42" in height if it extends into the front yard from the front of the home The attached site plan details that the southwest corner of our garage is four feet back from the front of the home Therefore, we could construct a fence that is greater than 42" in height so long as it only extended four feet from the southwest corner of the garage into the front yard thereby being flush with the front of the home Unfortunately, there are trees directly in the path of Line F (see attached site plan for all references to Lines) if Line E is four feet We therefore request, for the reasons descnbed below, that the City of Stillwater grant us a vanance allowing (1) the portion of the fence represented by Line E to extend at least ten, preferably sixteen, feet south from the southwest corner of the garage and be constructed at a height of 60", (2) the portion of the fence represented by Line F be constructed at a height of 60", and (3) the portion of the fence represented by Line A that extends past the front of the home be constructed at a height of 60" are The primary reasons supporting the City of Stillwater's decision to grant this vanance • The City wt11 be initiating and completing street repairs on Willard Street this summer and sidewalks will be added to our side of the street We have a large dog that can easily clear a 42" high fence and I am concerned that the added foot traffic caused by the sidewalk will entice him to do so • The west side of our lot has several trees and a cement slab If I could make it work under the current pelmet restrictions I would However, I would need to remove trees, and quite possibly a portion of their roots, if I were to construct the fence so that Line E was four feet or less Alternatively, we have a cement slab that extends the width of the garage which prohibits us from building a fence of any height behind the southwest Doc# 1760144\1 APR 30 2003 16 48 FR LINDQUIST-VENNUM 43 P TO 28514123123140400 P 03/05 April 30.2003 Page 2 corner of the garage Because of the tree placement the portion of the fence represented by Line E must extend at least ten feet • The fence, as proposed, will not adversely affect, but rather benefit the surrounding neighborhood The current fence is a white picket fence to very poor shape that currently extends approximately 25' south from the southwest corner of the garage Even though the variance, if granted, will allow us to construct a fence that is 18" higher, the fence will be a western, red cedar picket fence that will be at least nine feet further from the street I appreciate your review of this request If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Sincerely, Joe R Thompson V WEB�ST$R E4RO�THERS SEGO D IA OIT[ON 4 FERD] WEST OAK STREET '"" t MARTHA STREET ADDITIO! 1a 9 a TREET fsl 8 12 $ 11 0 a I I ea § 10 3 1➢ a w 8 47' w 1 1 e 9 w 7 1 62 C., w 8 R w 5 3 ®rm w 4 w 4 3 i 4..)..4 w 2 i IDw 1 4 IE 8 � � p to ? oy 61s 6i] xs el! os m] 111 Ie ,5 so 6.0 (o 39) (0037) () (0333) 7 a R J 1]E „ SOUTH WILLIAM G 3 .®I 9 206u 356A3 (�� 730 m 9 a a L g COUNTY 1 !0 mt J, w FOR'S p PLAT i5 IN 1w 0 9 a 111.2 R 4 J 8 9 4 611E 6i 7 8 s m 62 -- 8 5 CI 5 16 s p 13 7 8 8 7 6 43 a 5 w 4 w 75 2 75 1 (P.m 5 1m I WEST PINE STREET 2 3a 2 ® E�z 5 a LULL'S 4 a ADDITION 3 sl. , p TO w 2 _ STZLWAlliR R. 7 R w f Ei R w 30 30 30 01IS ® 7 8 7 R //� is 2 8 4P.I 40.117 a tp to 30 30 a.� F gym. R Io 1 p +fin 1t 11,.. ,— \ \\�� ® 6E _ �I1D + �'x'I W ILLARD STREET 60 2 w 41➢m' w 4 R w w 3 2 w y� 60 8 5 J__I 4 a pm,8141 3 aowg•A� i w YT 2 w 1 60 w 8 7 w a �= w I w iw 8 w w jot! t[ m 4 V 17�--- — 5 I , A I 6 4 7 70 A w 1 ` a 8 a 10 "mg 60w �.}� w 7 a..�, RVal 8 F .—. 11.—" ® �® B0 o a ARK 1 60 4 8 w 3 8 w 2R w 1R tF., 80 60 6 0 " 6 r, 5 w 4 w 3 R w 28 w 1? 60 6 0 6 0 w 8 xs 58 w 4 w 9 R 7, ..— 8 -, ADDI1 HOL9OM,BE'S 5 w 8- w 7 8 w 8 w ---.67 7 8 w 8 28 w w 10 ern R 1 7 w'�"f 8 1 SO 8 93 to 8 w it 8 w 12 8 w WEST CHURCHI)._ STREET o CO 20 Location Map w w so w w w w ® w hE R_1W R?0W R19W R_W R_IW ROW Vicinity Map 0 181 Scale in Feet 0305.53 rNd corpw — 5C0arwmm �slaiy Th▪ e cleam/Ap Paso .w .I.oaCm.n tol napratti• Own. Wr..aaCeviy EWvey. .om. Rer0w IOE®1 <....wlcmASw.mr.t, w w *� APR 30 2003 16 49 FR LINDOUIST—VENNUM 43 P 1 TO 2851412312340400 P 05/05 C 4°-.) ---0 ** TOTAL PAGE 05 you PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V03/51 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 504 West St Croix Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zomng District RB Applicants Name David P Ponath Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 5 feet requested) for the construction of an addition above an existing attached garage Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to construct an addition over an existing garage The garage has a flat roof Technically, an addition could be constructed to the rear of the house and no Variance would be required Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 The architectural style, materials, and color match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by lus neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings —PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Address of Project 51x1 W Case No V o3-57 Date Filed 5l5 /03 Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED FEES Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 Vanance $70/200 Resubdivision $100 Subdivision* $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any applcation All supporting pporting material (1 e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes theyo copies of supporting material is required If application Isubmitted to eSt, City Councllwater il, twelveen , (12)copies of supporting material is required A site plan Is required with applicat,ons Any Incomplete applicat,on or supporting material will delay t appbcat,on process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION sr trio, x Zoning District C, �691/ ext5 4 Ora Assessor's Parcel No 2 ►d324634tS9' Description of Project /1 Noino4 04 s t., ture, e JIr breve (GEO Code) ono i "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data,'nformat,on and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply wI the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owners t P,n City - State - Zip f'i / I }ry jfl jy 33-0 a Z City - State - Zip Telephone No Telephone No Signature (Signature Is required) Lot Size (dimensions), x Land Area I I , o }o Sduair f.Fr Height of Buildings Sr S ories Principal Accessory Feet Signature Representative Mailing Address5 -f ' SI Cpfx ,1 t. Mailing Address "a/f/Le (Signature Is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor ea 2. l7 i 0 square feet Existing js%if square feet Proposed 49 2, square feet Paved Impervious Area(r,i► square feet No of off-street parking spaces c%. H 4ncnamaralshedalPUWAPP FRM April 12 2002 5.01- W. Si. Croy Ae.) MiI/ Water, MN May 4, 2003 Dear Members of the Stillwater Planning Commission We have enjoyed hvmg in Stillwater for almost ten years In fact, we are the third generation to live here at 504 West St Croix Avenue Our home was built in 1948 by my husband's grandfather, a woodworker at Stillwater Manufacturing We hope to continue this tradition and pass our home on to our own children someday However, three children and a dog and frequent guests and visitors have made us feel somewhat crowded m our three bedroom, one and a half bath, story and a half home We decided to contact a builder and see about enlargmg our home with a simple bedroom and bath addition above our flat -roofed garage and an expanded entryway When our builder tried to obtain a building permit, however, he discovered that zonmg regulations require living spaces to be at least ten feet away from the property hne As our existmg garage is built five feet away from the east side of our property, a variance request for just five more feet is necessary for this project to take place We feel a variance would be m the best interest of our family, our neighborhood and the city of Stillwater for the following reasons As already stated, our family is beginning to outgrow our home m its current state We like the fact that our grandfather and great grandfather built this house and built it well Family hentage is important to us We lke our North Hill neighborhood We really do not wish to move away from what we feel is a good place for our children to grow up The space above the garage is the most logical, cost-effective and aesthetically pleasmg location for an addition. (The flat roof above the garage gives the house an unfinished look and is not the best kind of roof for Minnesota's climate) An addition will enhance our quality of hfe and the architecture of our house We chose an above the garage addition for another reason —we would hie to keep our yard as large as possible Our children and the neighborhood children often play here and we want them to have room to run, We have shown our plans and spoken with our immediate neighbors concerning the addition Jerome Petroski, our neighbor on the east side, does not mind if we build, even if it's five feet away from the property line His house is another forty-eight feet away from that hne anyway Our attached garage has always been there We are not estabhshing new boundaries or changing the footpnnt of the house We are supply building over an existmg structure "As long as you stay here," said Jerome Many homeowners m our area are renovating and expandmg their homes We do not anticipate any negative reaction to this project Finally, Stillwater itself will benefit Although both my husband and I work outside of Stillwater, we have chosen to live here because we love the area, the city and the house that Grandpa built We shop here, go to the doctor here, use the hbrary and the school system, the playgrounds and parks We pay taxes here and as you know, a project such as this will only increase the value of our home and the taxes we pay on it' Stillwater has many lovely homes This project will also add to the character of our home and therefore, the face value of our city Thank you for considering our apphcation We beheve we have a reasonable request and trust that you will deal with it fairly We will be happy to answer any questions you may have at the Planning Commission meeting on June 9 Sincere David and Ann Ponath ,fl I'" Ion /A kt. K tri 34 # &trQLi' Now- tp0 5?r.PS y 8 4- rolool �'ne +c Aditoe I+ONse, 8' 4 03, Csfl*oetJ f23- LAAhl 5TinET bar Map/ •F+ GE ✓4 444 CNrtR of cp24 r rrr• Apo_ elev. r:.r■rrrr rr; r. rrr r• r rrrr dad rrr 1COa"ik E�i_ X 1.v...1. rJLlr lrrr■e /Vg d rr�ir�rrrrl� P19)! ":kr ltrirJLJlt�lX2 r"1112411TLT�:�r24uJM�+= rjr.►1rrr.rrr■......rri■r■r■r■irr.rrr■r.rr`r..........rrrrrird i.rrrrr■ ■i■rr.rr�rr....................r■rrirr. .rrrrr■rrr■rrr■rr . rrr rrr . r r r r r ■ r r r r r r■■ rr rr r r rrrrr r• �r r■ r r r r A Ir11•r•1■rr11131•1•�■1.11r111r311i1013 .'1■3tr1r1r1.C8311:21.�.323r'1r`ii13■1.3■3r'i■rtrri■3:1■`r.`r:� �r�■C3:31r 34 rrrrrr■r.r■rrrr r rrr; rrr: r.r.r.r■r r r r.rrrrr� rrrrrrr■ lili$Ji.r.rrrJi.r1 4406.Ar.r.rrr.iJi•■.r$.r.r4 ..r.r.r.r.r.rrr.r.r �i�Ji . 4121 Lrrr�r�rrr.r_rr_rr.rrr.rrr.r_rr.r..rrrrr�r.r.r.r.r�r�r.r.rrrrr.r.r�r.r�r!rr.r.r.r.r.r.r.r�r!�!� �• r� r.rr�■rr,.iri!i!�� rrrrirlg �� rrir�r�� Nagger rrr �liggi�rr■a.r.rr�rrr•�•rrr•r•rrrrrr�� r� r.rrrrr'rrrr•rrrrrrrrr■rrrrr•r•r'r+■i•rrrr+rrrrrrrrrrrrrr.r.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■r■r■rrr. 214.411213211211.._._ rrrr rrr■rrrrr.rrr■rrrrrrrr.rrr■rrr■rrr■rrr: :rrr.1rrre. ,r:r•r.r.!rr!r.r.rrrrrr.r.r.rrrrr.rrr.r.r.r.r.rr` . ■.■ _�r�rrrrr rre -.-.� wrote W� �r�rr�■�■%■r■�.iir�.r'r�rrr�rrri.�■�.�r�rrrrrrr�•rr�■%.rrir�i:iiiVr��:rEWEI:iil■r■r.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■r �i_-irrrrrrrr■irr. "`` "` Jr r J-J-JMrJ<r rxtrxlrxyr xylLxrrtrxrlJr r r 1 Jl.r JArJM JArJM J——trxrrr PARIU Cr■rrrrr�rrrrr�rrrrrrrrr■r' y r rrr rrrrr r r r r r r r ■ r■ r r r r r r r r ,`abi rrrr■�r�.�.n■n■k■�, .rrrr�■ir�rrrrrrrr•rrr■rrr■r■r■irrrr.r■rrr■rrrrrr■r■r■rrr■rrrrr■rrr■dd ��� �irrrrrr■r■rrr. ryi�yrr�yy■itir`r�`r'r�r`r��_:�:.'�'liorrrrrrrrrrrr■rrrrrr■rrrrrrr■r■r■rrr■rrrrrrrr•r■rrr■r■r.rrr.rrrr:= �rw.ro rrrrrr. Yr? rrrrrr■■■rJ • `ititer_`r_'JM_`r`rtJM'JM`mst!zo r`r`mgri `11lr-'JM='t rr-'Jllltr_`r_'JM-`,M_tiNutrrrrrrr■r1"■rr`rf� .1Juu Rr; �; r� rrr; +�%r.r.• .rrrrrrriilrrrrrrrrrrr.r.rr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr•rrrrr■r■rrr•rrr■r.r•r.r•rrr. ,rr�.irrrrir+rrrr• � rrrrrrrrrrrrr•rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�■r!rrr�rrr; rrrrrrr; rrr; rrrrrrrrrrrrr.r.rrr.rrr.r.r: ENE MEM SEMI - -MEI ISJL III - MIN — NMI FRONT ELEVATION BACK ELEVATION rrebyinfrY ■■elo RIGHT ELEVATION INN ik AIld Vigr`xrxr 4r Ir: .4rtrrrrrJLrrWN `M-�rtJ�rxrx'xrxrrJN :yrJlr�lrrtrJLrrrrJ LEFT ELEVATION PAVE : ANN PONATH i?ESIDENG _ 4 TRADITIO"V OF CR 4FTSM4 VSHIP PROJECT ADDITION PROJECT NO 220qq SCALE 1 /8° = 1' DATE 2q APRIL 2003 SHEET 1 OF 6 NOTES VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS DRAWINGS/DESIGNS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MARTIN JOSEPH DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTRACTORS LICENSE A 5441 294b 294b 13'-0 1/2" 21-q 1/2' 60'-6" 12'-S' 2g40 2440 2g40 12'-q" BEDROOM 12 8 x 11 b 6„ co « CLOSET 012. 5 5 0 Z h ^ wx z z , BATH 7 1 x8 01 2868 iy LIVING 14 0 x 15 5 14'-1" 3446 CLOSET 71 x3 7�`fl 3068 10'-0" HALL 911 x3 1 3068 69 GLOSETc33p 2 4' 7 7 n cn S'-6" 4'-3" 4' 3" DO NOT REMOVE BEDROOM 120x116 '-q 15/16" CLOSET 8 x 1 e18 .O in n I - II II II '1 rUP to V i DINING as 9 5 x 15 5 o KITCHEN 11 2 x12 1 g' 6„ ENTRY 510x37 3446 4 '-6" 3068 6' 6" T-2" M:11!•!1111111.1.11111=11 MN IRE 0 0 2g30 LIVING AREA 60'-6" tr n DECK 77x38 6068 16'-0" 2g40 EXPAND ENTRY ENTRY 8 4 x 14 0 _ 30.8 m n O 3446 r GARAGE 154 x23 4 FIRE RATE GARAGE WALLS'> & CEILING O et tr n 0 9 dJ 4'-0" 8'-6" -I. g070 16'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN DAME & ANN PONATH RESIDENCE 4 TRADITION OF CRAFTSMAVSHIP PROJECT ADDITION PROJECT NO 220qq SCALE 3/16" = 1' DATE 2q APRIL 2003 SHEET 2 OF 6 NOTES VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS DRAWINGSIDESIGNS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MARTIN JOSEPH DESIGN 8 CONSTRUCTION INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTRACTORS LICENSE it 5447 36'-0" 6O'-b" 4'-3" 8'-8" 16'-0" 4'-3" 6'-3" -- 3' 6" b'-3" iinn STORAGE 35 4 x b 4 REMOVE WINDOW & DOOR CLOSET 6 4 x7 11 BEDROOM 16 8 x13 11 BUILT INS 8'-0sI CLOSET 116x28 BUILT INS OPEN BELOW —_ I114x210 tij n q'-01' HALL 183x57 1 PONATH 23 �244O — —H — — _ 3446 __3446 frL \\ LINEN 24 71 26b k_42068 o BA 85x76 2468 �1 HALL 85x30 :--- CASED OPENING (PAINTED) REMOVE WINDOW & A C 18'-8" BUILT INS ..�.\\\ --CERAMIC TILE tes .fl HARDWOOD FLOORS TUB/SHOWER CLOSET 85x54 N 2 \\\.\..\\\\\\\\\\\. \\\\..\\L\. \ \ LIVING AREA 1iti"R MASTER BDRM 154x218 OPENING FOR A/C / \ / \\>x\\\\\-\\\\\ EXTENDED ROOF SUSPENDED CLOSET 24'-10" 1 d 0 a SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4 TRADITION OF CR 4FTSMAVSHIP PROJECT ADDITION PROJECT NO 220gq SCALE 3/16" = 1' PATE 29 APRIL 2003 SHEET 3 OF 6 NOTES VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS DRAWINGS/DESIGNS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MARTIN JOSEPH DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE * 5447 HAND FRAME ROOF IN/ 2" X 8" SFP RAFTERS & 2" X b" SPF CEILING JO5T5, TO ACT A5 "COLLAR TIE" FOR CEILING 5/8" 05B ROOF SHEATHING CEILING HEIGHT TO MATCH EXISTING FRAME DORMER WITH 2" X 8" 5PF RAFTERS CEDAR SHAKE SHINGLES ON DORMER EXTERIOR 240 LB 3-TAB SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING 30 LB FELT WITH ICE DAM BARRIER I5T 36" SIX ROOF VENTS EXTERIOR WALLS 2" X b" SPF OR BETTER INTEROR WALLS 2" X 4" 5PF OR BETTER WALL SHEATHING 1/2" 05B 3 PLY 11 1/8" MICROLAM BEAM IN GARAGE 2" X 10" FLOOR JOIST "SHOULDER" TO EXISTING 2" X 6" RAFTER 3/4" T&G PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR SOFFIT & FASCIA TO MATCH EXISTING 8" STEEL WOODGRAIN SIDING, EDCO BRAND WHITE FIELD VERIFIED EXISTING FOOTING DEPTH OF 44" WITH 8" CONCRETE BLOCK 4 IN 12 PITCH 4 TRADITION OF CRAFTSMA VSHIP PROJECT ADDITION PROJECT NO 22099 SCALE 1/4" = 1' DATE 29 APRIL 2003 SHEET 5 OF 6 NOTES VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS DRAWINGS/DESIGNS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MARTIN JOSEPH DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTRACTORS LICENSE* 5441 73 FEET LOW fO IS7M ? C ld' re Od 1 I 2.0 I • 17, I b' i ■. DO�� �� 9 w I- Lr li 1.7 y 10 _ w.v1 n1r ear w �r _ G..� h ,� J Y �--G u 1. n..�w rw. mmo -- 11 FEET a8 r v7C, _ 5 FEET 4 '1J -I Od I WO Od' 1 S M WOtw VW WO' ti.SC w WO 30 FEET ST C OIX AVE A TRADITION OF CRAFTSMANSHIP PROJECT ADDITION PROJECT NO 220gq SCALE DATE 2q APRIL 2003 SHEET 6 OF b NOTES VERIFY ALL MEASUREMENTS 17RAWINGS/DE5tGN5 ARE THE PROPERTY OF MARTIN JOSEPH DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTRACTORS LICENSE # 5441 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-53 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 1101 South Fourth Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Michael and Jennifer Peltier Type of Application Variance Project Descnption A Variance to the street side setback (front- 30 feet required, 11' 10" requested) and a Vanance for impervious surface coverage (30% required, 65% requested) for the construction of a two car attached garage Discussion The applicants are requesting approval of Variances to the required setback and for the amount lot coverage of impermeable surface The lot size is nonconforming Minimum lot size in this zoning distnct is 7500 square feet, and the applicants lot size is 5450 square feet Due to the size of the lot, any more construction would create a serious problem with water run off (see attached letter from City Engineer) Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggests the following condition of approval 1 The architectural style, materials, and color match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings . PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 5508 *An escrow fee 1 als The applicant is res • o oMMv e for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in conne ion with any apphcat,on All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with apphcat,on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If apphcat,on is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete apphcat,on or supporting material will delay apphcation process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No akaC FEES $50/200 -SFefEeersi $100 $100+50/l $500 $300 $500 $ 70 Address of Project 1 ► 3 ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit 7Vanance )Ob _Resubdivision _Subdivision* _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* _Zoning Amendment* __Planning Unit Development * _Certificate of Compliance e costs of attorney and engineering fees So 4h' s.-riz+r-st-z' Assessor's Parcel No 33a2...10016/490kh Zoning District Description of Project Any, LEV ILL o ,ov tee, �XGEO(Code) o►ae. Z e-f• X 2.051 FOOD fa G {a -t i Z.4 x Z pjb A.*-b 0 0 C�ivw�ar-nr"c. Li es4 IO X1O� "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, mformat,on and evidence submitted herewith in respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply v the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner hi' I `^,,,tel a �` �� ���4Q-S-- .i/S�P..l' Representative L Mailing Address (I D 1 , LT \ 5 f - Mailing Address t oz o IMo.,rF:, &J. Av+- City - State - Zip a UJa e r � 1 j� c' a City - State - Zip .Sri �w a.-rd o 5 2 50 8 Telephone No S/ Z130 q. 9 Signature L !gnat / e is required) (Signature Is required) Telephone No GS(-4r39- C? t b Lot Size (dimensions)»o9sx _EQ Land Area s4`7SS Height of Buildings Stories Principal IYZ Accessory Feet z4 H Imcnamaralsheila1PLANAPP FRM April 12 2002 Srgnatup» SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area 3332 square feet * Existing 2c 7 o square feet Proposed z e z- square feet Paved Impervious Area z53 square feet No of off-street parking spaces 0 t Cyu2s4 97...5 sf pF gSMT r 0 8 0 z m m m Y N w Y 50 50 e5 9 1281R 8 A 9 1287/2 A 01 32 1 Y co 33 4 05 088 %7 nL' m m 43 a5 m 18 50 MARS 50 50 354 s m mom' CD 9.9 m 50 6 10 25 m m 50 JD TION T Y Y Y 01 . �(n A79 50 50 m mom' Y � m m 6 no m 50 VA 50 50 m m Nw m m 05 STILL\\ Y Y 2 Y 50 B 3 m m 1N 0 AT 0 JUUI1 40 w 0 ���y Fn' A g �yYI� Yn m I 10 40 40 m rlr 1 n SOUTH FOU TH 39w Jib 40 I� V 40 I m 40 1w 40 40 40 to 10 10 10 0IKGGI STREET' 10 >n �v I5 10 50 40 *N 10 l 40 1 m 20 (0 A 9 0, 10 m 40 is 10 g 10 40 'ma`s m A 6 0 6 0 iw ei e SOUTH 0 0 THIRD STREET 0 CSAH 23 01 ex 15 �' ® !4 >n I b I 467 ae e d + a2 m u a e u in Y i u k !� u a QO Y m Y 6 ,��- Y g p o Y Y u *� I S a u i� m !w �n !w rn w �— `• VD' 9 So 0 40 !e 9� 2 20 it 20 {3 m a tr U 40 g 9 s� g V. g 9� 9 g 9 g 1 9 50 m m m m l m m m m I I ( r lee j w eleoS 0 0I W 11 1 Memorandum To Sue Fitzgerald / From Klayton Eckles, City Engineer 4Ls' ✓ Date June 6, 2003 Subject Importance of Impervious Surface Regulations The City of Stillwater has impervious surface regulations in the City's ordinances that regulate the maximum amount of impervious or hard surfaces on individual lots The purpose of these regulations is not just centered on aesthetics, greater impervious surfaces yield much higher rates and volumes of runoff Blacktop and rooftops cause water to runoff much faster Also these surfaces reduce the area available for water to pool and infiltration of water into the ground Failure to observe the impervious surface regulations can cause two senous problems First localized flooding and erosion can occur in the immediate vicinity of lots that are highly impervious City staff spends a significant amount of time workmg with residents concerning local flooding and erosion problems Often times these are caused by new construction or changes in the drainage area The second problem relates to the City storm sewer system Much of the City's storm water system was designed and installed 30 to 100-years ago Large portions of our system, especially in the old town, are senously undersized and do not come close to today's standard for design Additional impervious surface in these drainage areas puts a significant burden on a storm sewer system that is already marginal By ngorously enforcing impervious surface standards, the City may ultimately avoid major infrastructure improvements that could be necessary to handle additional storm water runoff and flooding problems By way of example the City has spent well over $1 million on storm water retrofitting in the ravines and historic portions of Stillwater m the last five years Often times when viewed on an individual basis the impervious regulation seems insignificant but when viewed in a broader context and considenng our system is on the verge of inadequacy, small changes can result in major impacts For these reasons the Engineenng Department supports the implementation of the current impervious regulations May 9, 2003 RE Request for vanance Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Community Development Department, I am wnting to request your consideration to grant a variance to our home We would like to add a two -car garage and an addition to the second floor of our home The house is already in non-compliance because it is not set back 30 feet from the front That is because the ongmal structure was built in 1880 We feel it is necessary to have a garage due to the inconvenience of parking on the street dunng the winter months We occasionally park in the yard but that is not possible when the ground is soft In order to comply with winter parking regulations we plow the snow in our back yard so that we may park off the street but that results in very little grass being able to grow because of the scraping of the topsoil leaving an unsightly mud pit when it rains At some point in the past the previous owners of our home sold 25 ft of the back of our lot to the neighbors behind us It is partly because of that sale that in order to fit a two -car garage on the existing lot we must get within 10 feet of the neighbors property line There are currently no existing structures on the neighbor's property near where we plan to put up our garage We would also like a variance to add an addition to our home In order to add two average size bedrooms to the second floor of our home the house would need to be cantilevered out 1' 10" on each side of the house I believe the improvements done to our home will enhance the current neighborhood Our house is currently the smallest and most unadorned house in the neighborhood This project will put our home on par with its current neighbors by adding architectural elements such as gabled windows that will enhance it's esthetic appeal to those who live in the area and for those who dnve past Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Michael and Jennifer Peltier PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/03-54 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 1801 Market Drive Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicants Name Eric Robbins, TNT Fireworks Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit for temporary sale of fireworks Discussion The request is for a 10 day permit to sell fireworks from the CUB parking lot The lot is oversized and can accommodate the temporary use A nonprofit organization will see the fireworks Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 The request shall be approved by the Fire Chief and Police Chief 2 The permit is good from June 25 - July 5, 2003 One time only Attachments Application 05/16/20a3 09 24 4308810 CITY 0c STILLWWER rtiut r�l PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Pald Receipt No 71'76/ SDP D3�3 FACTION REQUESTED /� SpedaUConditional Use Permit Vananoe ResubdMsion Subdivision' Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment" _Planning Unit Development " Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this applicatlon engineering des 'An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney end eng ng The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (I e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material Is required If application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copof or supporting material Is required A site plan Is required with applications Any incomplete application supporting material will delay the application process C/14 f0» 1 Address of Project g I A ftek p(?. Assessor's Parcel No PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION � .. 0Code) frft1dflkftrZoning Distnct Description of Protect 144 "1 hereby state the foregoi statements d all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in ail respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used - _Mir Propertyowner St2 ihcaRepresentativeE.Lia eolin�- ,FIRE i ���� Mailing Address ��-I/ Mailing Address ?ills E v 57 .14 �0 City - State • Zip City - State - Zip 1 Pad! if i /0 / t57—Zt-- /500 Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) _ x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Principal Accessory H Vna►arnara4.heI8VLANAPP7RM Telephone No Signature (Signature Is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area Existing square Feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces May 1, 2003 feet square feet ) D Location Map NATER HEIGHTS NMI MOUNT e. m DEEDS EG STILLWATER MARKET CURVE CREST B TOWER DRIVE STILLW. WEST FRONTAGE F WEmaao WSW. CODE EASTBOUND MOWN CENTS 6OTH STREET NORTH POINT eta FT W R_IW ROW RI9W R_ W R_IW R.OW Vicinity Map Scale in Feet Iles ammo L. ....W iaw .mWm* n A.. WsWpna Corts dre. TM up .a s um, b nr..le Aswan ass W.Www Ow, a moans. my assuarsow 9F.. W.Y.yun Os., S Of! Aw INS I OO. P. i wA�wwm.+A.ra stoIAD>* Was mBOOS� Permit Related Information Account Executive - State of Minnesota Eric Robbins 235 East 6th St , Suite 204 St Paul, MN 55101 651.228.1500 (office) 651 228 1400 (fax) encrobbins@gwest net Dear City of Stillwater, Mayor, and City Council Per my conversation with the city offices, we wanted to inform you of our upcoming non-profit fundraiser at Cub Foods parking lot from June 25 to July 5\th Attached you will find useful information regarding the sale As Account Executive for TNT Fireworks for the state of Minnesota, I would like to inform you of some key intentions and points regarding our sale 1 The date of sale will be June 25-July 5, 2003 2 The hours of operation will be approximately 9 a m to 10 00 p m 3 Twenty-four hour secunty will be in force 4 TNT Fireworks is the largest retailer of consumer fireworks and we have over 6000 locations nation-wide 5 We will obviously be selling only those items allowed by Minnesota State Statutes 6 Our tents are professional, clean, and flame retardency certificates are attached 7 We have enclosed everything required if anything is missing, please let us know 8 We have a contract with Cub, whom we also supply their inside fireworks stock as well Our non-profit group, Redeeming Love, and I will be at the upcoming public hearing and are looking forward to sharing this vision If you have any questions, please feel free to call me anytime I would like to further make myself available for anything else you need and want to stand true to our mission points of safety and clean family fun Thank you again for supporting our non-profit fundraising campaign Sincerely, Enc Robbins TNT Fireworks Account Executive 235 East 6th Street #204 St Paul, MN 55101 651-228-1500 office 651-228-1400 fax AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS INC PO BOX 1318 • 4511 HELTON DRIVE • FLORENCE AL 35630 PHONE (256) 764 6131 • FAX (256) 760 0154 www tntfireworks com O Ctib FOODS May 15, 2003 To Whom It May Concern TNT Fireworks is an approved Vendor for the year of 2003 to conduct Fireworks Tent Sales on our stores' parking lots The promotion will run 10-14 days, plus a few days before and after for set-up and tear -down Pnor to the opemng sales date, Enc Robbins, TNT Account Executive for the state of Minnesota will call on you to introduce himself, discuss the event, and the placement of the selling unit in your parking lot He is also responsible for obtaimng all necessary permits and/or licenses Thank you, in advance, for your cooperation in this matter and if you have any further questions please contact Enc Robbins at 651-228-1500 Sincerely, Cub Foods Bob Greenwald Category Manager kJ i YllorL1 1.11ALY ad t' +x 0 23\A 4 v -fra 1 Jai pfroofroJ vivo 94,E i 11 -c7,14i-----4 (in -vnti Iliti 44-nui -› 1 c? iiititlz-f- ''y-ou,' 7'7' °'bl +f 18 7'19"-I LIV i lid] 1v,/ `T I hial I �r am - _fir`st Anderson business was opened as a small news stand m 191 T--- orence,Alabama = _ _ �_ = - - _ __ - ma'su--___--_ _ FIREWORKS is the largest d-stributor of 1.4G CLASS C COMMON - ORKS in the United States TNT® -currently services over 11,000 ores across the United Sates, including ALASKA 1k HAWAII._AS Ieade_r11 :Iri lie wholesale distribution for 1.4G Class C Fireworks f0 ov_er� _ _ 0 years; TM® -makes it a policy to give each customer tndnndual -`== grams tailored to their individual customer base needs _ In order to- we up to this policy, TNT® is dedicated to our rinssion for = -_ - --_ _—_ ITMENT, QUALITY, AND TEAMWORK at all times _ _ T = _ _ - = w erson Companies currently -have over 75 distribution _and ware� - - .; .. rig facilities throughout theUnite_d States _which,_when combined T /--:. ,?'.fit _ loves 3--million square feet of space: 7 = _ _- ethe key to TN IIR_EWQRKS successors the_number one w necegof FIREWORKS PROMOTIONS is -a of threemam �ngred�ents:� QUALITY _ _ _ - _ - --TEAMWORK. __ There is NO substitutefor-tluatrtyr_ Another unportant element for Every customer wants the best = --building a suuessful worlang productatttebesf`pncaTMt�1'r - relahonship,steamworkjoT offers for quaity moved wdh fuIIy capnoEze on potii+he�for�ivW our reputahon of being theIeader PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-55 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location, 1311 3rd Street North Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Zoning District RA Applicants Name Thomas and Linda Furst Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance to the rear yard setback for the construction of a three season porch and deck Discussion The request is to construct a raised deck and porch 8 feet from the rear property line, 25 feet is required No special circumstances is provide by the applicant for the variance other than the addition is adding a "great space to the house" Recommendation Denial Attachments° Application and plan PLANNING ADMINISTL,TION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No V Date Filed r n E. Fee Paid /Di Receipt No 03 - 7igit ACTION REQUESTED x Special/Conditional Use Permit Vanance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application o supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project / 3// , RP .S Ply Assessor's Parcel No -9/613DQ6.3G975 (GEO Code) Zoning District Description of Project 3 3ea C 6 Yt pre -II 1- D6C k "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and belef, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply wi the permit if it is granted and used " Property OwnerThomas tt L-l>vda St rsr Representative Mailing Address 13 II 3" 5+ N3 - i Mailing Add City - State - Zip 5t ,11 LX-k r WI I ik) & 6OS2 City - State - Telephone No (t)/-q30 r?7.? /2-- W- /4, 9'7 7-0,77 L'e// Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions yOdx SO Land Area o ff72Cfe Height of Buildings Stor� Feet,/ Principal yy 15 Accessory / Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing /; Proposed Paved Impervious Area No of off-street parking s uare feet i�� >;r • square feet square feet spaces H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 VACATED JUNIPER STREET ( STREET DEDICATED PER PLAT ) 150 6 150 1 S g 5 23 2 8 ,Foss) ) 4 3 g 150 150 ( STREET DEDICATED PER PLAT ) g 150 6 150 $ #oe I S 1 8 M T 5 2 g g ) g S)4 006 3 ) — 150 150 o WEST STILLWATER AVE Location Map 791 g 6 ipox1 f 150 gnu) 1 $ �CARLI 18 2 781 0 5 dposo 3 772 J 4 48085) 3 R 4O57) 78.2 )756) 150 & BK 10 MISC EAST SYMOR ST CRO EAST STILLWI R21W RIW R19W R_W R.IW RAW Vicanity Map Scale in Feet �a ., e ▪ rr. SW Dear Planning Commission; We would like to add a 3 season porch (14x10) and a deck(10x 10 with a 4' landing and stairs). We would like you to grant this variance because it would add a great space to our house, opening up our eating area when the doors are open and giving us a room to go and relax. It will also give us an exit out of our upper since the original deck had to be removed. The structure would enhance the appearance and increase the value. The neighbors I think would like it if the house had a more finished look to it. I can not see any adverse affect to putting this structure up. Thank You Thomas and Linda Furst 1311 3rd St. N Stillwater MN 55082 s-e 7 08 AtVad vd VS.? v p q Q 4- $as ova g Ii4vn a4.3-1\-r ,00 1 f yeti gm, pi FrOOd N p 4-- 17.90(Vii vi -� -- — I ti 1 1 1 I T --1- -, =� '— \ -1 — I' G` __ .11 MATCH EXISTING SIDING LEFT ELEVATION I /4°= I' 0 2' G 12 12 a C MATCH EXISTING SIDING 1 FRONT ELEVATION 3 1 • I / 4"= 1'-0" MATCH EXISTING SIDING ROOF VENTS AS REQD PER CODE jfII- RIGHT ELEVATION I /4' = 11 0° a o, Lc r 0 0 (0 W J G1 41 N C 15 C15 r C15 /71 It SI— NEW 4'0' FRENCH DOORS REMOVE EXISTING PATIO DR T I2 I 12 2 INT It\T 2 IA-SEASONI POACH VAULTED J N PW02961 I AR T (V C15 N 1V0296 I I AL k (V �DECKJ GW5050 W/• GO I G TRAP ABOVE 41-3' GW5050 vr/ GO 1 G TRAP ABOVE 51--r' 0 41-3° 101-0' 14'-0' 1 4'-O' 41-Ou 2810' b 0 • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB-F/03-56 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 608 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Terra Springs, LLC Type of Application Subdivision Project Description The request is to subdivide the Territorial Prison Site, 10 13 acres, into 7 lots, 5 developable lots and 2 outlots Discussion The preliminary plat subdivision request is a follow up to the concept planned unit development approved previously by the planning commission on 4/14/03 The subdivision will create 5 developable lots and two outlots The 5 developable Tots will contain 5 structures and the 227 housing units a part of the PUD The two outlots are the wall and uplands and the courtyard archeological green Outlot B, 2 68 acres, will be owned by the city and Outlot A will be open to the public as a part of the park amenities An interpretative trail will encircle the site and connect to interpretive opportunities, caves, relocated wayside, interpretative center and possibly the wardens house Th site plan and utility plans are being reviewed by the engineering department and the roadway system has been reviewed an approved by the Fire Chief The subdivision has been referred to MnDOT for comment The developer will be installing all sewers and utilities The planned unit development use is consistent with the CBD zoning and the subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance and Downtown and Comprehensive Plans Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 Utilities, trails and public open space easements shall be provided as needed by the engineering and community development director 2 The street plan shall be modified to meet the fire chief's conditions of approval 3 The interpretative center, trail, archeological green shall be provided in lieu of park dedication 4 All utility plans shall) be reviewed and approved by the city engineer Attachments Application and preliminary plat P.ANVING ADMINISTR/ .ION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No 5 Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED — Special/Conditional Use Permit — Variance — Resubdivision X Subdivision * — Comprehensive Plan Amendment * — Zoning Amendment* — Planning Unit Development* — Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any apphcat on All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete appbcat on or supporting material will delay the appllcaton process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 608 No Main (Terntonal Pnson site) Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District CB Descnption of Project Mixed -Use Development (GEO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner CITY OF STILLWATER Representative TERRA SPRINGS LLC (Brian Sweeney) Mailing Address 216 No Fourth Street Mailing Address. 180 E. 5th Street — ste. 160 City - State — Zip Stillwater. MN 55082 City - State — Zip St Paul. MN 55101 Telephone No 651-430-8800 Telephone No 651-291-3591 Signature Signature (Signature is required) (Signature is re; t� ed) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION see next page H \mcnamara\she la\PLANAPP FRM April 12 2002 PLANNING ADMINISTR/..ION APPLICATION FORM Page 2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No Lot Sizes LOT ONE / Block One 37,055 SF± Total Building floor area square feet 0 85 AC+ LOT ONE / Block Two 36,052 SF+ 0 83 AC+ LOT TWO / Block Two 62,779 SF+ 1 44 AC+ LOT THREE / Block Two 37,4405 SF+ 0 86 AC+ LOT ONE / Block Three 48,474 SF+ 1 11 AC+ OUTLOT A 107,559 SF+ 2 46 AC+ OUTLOT B 116,809 SF+ 2 58 AC+ , Land Area approx. 6 Acres Existing 8.000 square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed 250,000 square feet Pnncipal 2-6 stones 20-58 feet Paved Impervious Area square feet Acccssory ( total of 5 buildings) No of off-street parking spaces — 342 H mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM Apnl 12 2002 SCALE: 1 Inch = 50 Feet West Ll... Street l O DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED FREEMAN RLS 16989', UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. ❑ DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND AND MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED 'FREEMAN RLS 16989', UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. • DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND. SIZE AND MARKINGS AS SHOWN. ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM 15 THE RECORDED PLAT OF TERRITORIAL PRISON ADDITION VICINITY MAP SEC. 28, T3ON, R2OW 4 11 (NO SCALE) TERRA SPRINGS i I ♦, 1 NI 6D% _ �I Block �` A pl ,' s a I l$ I ^nl 111 rn 1^r I/��^ S88"54'21 "W N 1L.1 J I �_ ` I JvnL.L.0 Ydvh / --149.95-- ---- North Line Of The South BOO ; �l a Feet Of Lot 2, Block 6, C '1i 3 Block Seven ape SyA ^. h and Schulmhurg s Addition I "•i 1. A PEE t °`AapO e ) p S88"54'21 "W \ o o O (Described in Book 3o—� `" a� • $ i 149.93-- y ; Z S88"44'11 "W Eds� ^ B°ed P \ 31�so fir' _ : -- 267.20 -- a, a�?\ --- South Line Lot 2, Block 6 n '--South Line East Elm Street \ u/\ 8 yPrison WolL �i^, \ Lot Comer Falls On ---:' Set At Corner. Monument r� • __- , ?,1 \ \ J N85 04'53"E o� 407.94 07 qC e-a7,56, �91g. \ 230.93 ----- _ �sr• L_ \ • t77.01 __�- -------- 6 St."ere,`. V`A_ OUTLOT B S3 4zo 5� ,�' LOT THREE ›9? 6F �'� ti�ry BLOCK TWO LOT TWO LOT ONE A r1rl?1-I/1AI rl✓✓1 1 IVI v OUTLOT A LOT ONE i5`6--- I • \ Air 34- 2%$A3 `, h to.a (1 db 157. t.,o\ y LOT ONE 1 °0.8 A `ib S'99 45 1» :see 79g86 _'--» ''Sao>s 43 E BLOCK ONE I Y TERRA SPRINGS LAND PLANNING FE E SURVEYING ENGINEERING 5620 MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH, ST ILLWATER, MN 55082 Phone (651) 439-8833 Fax (651) 430.9331 Website: www.ife•inc.com Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets SCALE 1 Inch = 50 Feet 25 50 rt, West GI El"' cJ�a'22 s 4c LE- C .3 NOTES O DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED FREEMAN RLS 16989 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE O DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND AND MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED FREEMAN RLS 16989 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE • DENOTES IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND SIZE AND MARKINGS AS SHOWN ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS THE RECORDED PLAT OF TERRITORIAL PRISON ADDITION It VICINITY MAP SEC 28 T3ON R2OW C TERRA LgSPRINGS � 2 2 WI I AT LAUREL STR - 2 C5 CSAH 5 L- Ix 60 0 CI L7 0 oco ti to r+ 0 S88'54 21 W 149 95 Bo� PRELIMINARY PLAT TERRA' SPRINGS 0. 6 (y _ _ 4 en i A 1I 1i r11 \L 1 A 0, L._- N th L Of Th S th 8 00 1 I F t 0l L t 2 Block 6 C rl 50 I.�qo d5h 1 b g Addt S88'54 21 W o o L 149 93 y z 6l. -/ �.F1VL L L v1`1 7 A rl1'\IT (l6 1 , 1LJL71 I IL/I c* 0 (D bd Bok30_77', S88 44 11 W East Inge T\ 8 - South-Chre'L t 2 Block 6 L t Cor er Fall On P W 11 N Mon ment S t At Cor 116 809 SF± 2 68 AC± I L_1 \I \ 60 \ L/ South L E I Elm St eet 700 23093 ---- -- -- ,/ 37 40 SF± 0 86 ACf BLOC TWO 62 779 SF± 14IAC± i A 1 1/—I S82" / )25 72 48 25 E i 6 y r..%i 5, T/ 1 06 c ti� 1, S7g 5/21 E SB0B57 40 ' 66 g o = 560 n0y N5Ri2 ,P ! 25 37 E THE---, LO AND (S 9232 Y,P \ ' n ? m NO MON SM EE� LMESTONE CLIFF7RL5 92321 A ,f�fl\ �� \ N..- \ " NO CRUMBLED 510tIE \ r ) rr ✓r�� I It i i G ! / G \� - r / I J / n^ l r+\ 7 II/ / m / � 15718 \ 60 \ \ \ v \ r /`t":1" I I \ o \ \ / 6I�L ` JI11 7�1 / / / \ t0r / 60 \ \ 0 \ s,\ 9e 9.7 i, j▪ 9 \ 35s s f9 *'\ T 9 Sj 6 AC Suth„y(S79556 75 7 0 '22 E d C° (rh wd P M W // 15� sett a S8O 1 3 669 •^ice t 7<� 511} LOP III0 Folz Freeman Erickson Inc N LAND PLANNING E SURVEYING ENGINEERING 5620 MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 Phone (651) 439 8833 Fax (651) 430 9331 Websue www ffe me com ti. \ S/nn1 vi \ e7ei \ 1 BLO THREE P4 ss 6 0 } 01 / C}re ✓re an 57� / / / I /1 O 3 co v.co I 1 Qa �2 I I I I I I I -ZsI I I I I I I 66 ICJ O) TERRA SPRINGS OWNERS CERTIFICATE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That the City of Stillwater A home rule city of the third class a Minnesota municipal corporation fce owner of the following described property situated in Washington County Minnesota Lot 1 and Lot 2 Block One of the TERRITORIAL PRISON ADDITION on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder Washington County Minnesota Have caused the same to be surveyed platted and known as TERRA SPRINGS and do hereby dedicate the easements created be this plat for drainage and/or utility purposed only In witness whereof the City of Stillwater A home rule city of the third class a Minnesota municipal corporation has caused these presents to be signed and sealed by its proper officers this day of 200 CITYOFSTILLWATER By By Jay L Kimble Mayor Morli Weldon Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 by Jay L Kimble Mayor and Morh Weldon Clerk of the City of Stillwater a home rule city of the third class a Minnesota municipal corporation on behalf of the Corporation (Signature Of Notary Public) (Pnnted Name Of Notary Pubbc) Notary Public Minnesota My commission expires SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE 1 Timothy J Freeman hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as TERRA SPRINGS that this plat is a correct representation of the survey that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths ofa foot that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat and that there are no wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 505 02 Subd I or public highways to be designated on said plat other than as shown Timothy J Freeman Minnesota Registered Land Surveyor Registration No 16989 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ) The foregoing certificate by Timothy J Freeman Registered Land Surveyor was acknowledged before me a Notary Public this day of 200 (Signature Of Notary Public) (Pnnted Name Of Notary Public) Notary Public Minnesota My commission expires COUNTY SURVEYOR Folz Freeman Erickson Inc LAND PLANNING SURVEYING ENGINEERING 5620 MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH STILLWATER, MN 5)082 Pho (651) 439 8833 Fa (601) 430 9331 Webs wn If c com Pursuant to Chapter 820 Laws of Minnesota 1971 this plat has been approved this day of 200 By By Washington County Surveyor CITY OFSTILLWATER Approved by the City Council of the City of Stillwater Minnesota this day of 200 The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 505 03 Subd 2 have been satisfied Signed Signed Mayor Clerk Approved by the City of Stillwater Planning Commission this day of 200 Signed Signed Chairman Secretary COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER There are no delinquent taxes the current taxes due and payable for the year 20 have been paid and transfer entered this day of 200 By By Washington County Auditor/Treasurer Deputy COUNTY RECORDER Document Number 1 hereby certify this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 200 at o clock_ M and was recorded in Washington County Rccords By By Washington County Recorder Deputy TERRA SPRINGS Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date June 5, 2003 Subject Zoning Map Amendment Changing the Zoning of Nine Lots Containing Approximately 25 acres from Agricultural Preservation, AP, to Lakeshore Residential, LR, 20,000 Square Feet Per Lot Kevin and Roxanne Shoeberg, applicants Case No ZAM/03-03 Background This area was annexed to the City in 1996 as a part of Phase I city expansion Per City Land Use Policy, the property came into the city zoned Agricultural Preservation as an initial holding zone for further study and specific urban designation The AP zone district requires a 10 acre lot size and for this use requires additional planning study, rezoning before subdivision Proposed Rezoning The proposed zoning is for changing the zoning from Agricultural Preservation to Lakeshore Residential The district being proposed for rezoning is nine large lots of 2-3 acres located north and south of 62nd Street (a related application from the applicant for the zoning amendment proposed subdividing a 3 acre lot into four lots Case No SUB/03-61 ) Analysis The application is consistent with the single family large lot land use designation of the comprehensive plan The whole area is being considered for rezoning to coordinate public utilities and to have consistent land use Utilities can be provided from the surrounding area Zoning amendments require Joint Board approval Recommendation Approval of the rezoning Findings The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application and rezoning map PLANNING ADMINISS`. .TION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No 7701 /03- 0 3 Date Filed S/asj/ p3 Fee Paid SOO Receipt No 707010 ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Vanance Resubdnnsion Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment x Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engmeenng fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any appl►cat►on All supporting matenal (i e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If appl►cabon is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application o supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 12730 - 62nd_Street North Assessor's Parcel No i _ nIn _ 9n 43 0001 (GEO Code) Zoning Distnct AP Description of Project Rezone to Lakeshore Residential et "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify 1 will comply w►i the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Kevin & poxanne Shneherg Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No . 1- 4 3 0- 9 0 3 8 Telephone No Mailing Address 12730 - 69nd qt reet NrLth City - State - Zip st, 1 lwa t- e r f MN 55087 Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) _ x Land Area Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed square feet Principal Paved Impervious Area square feet Accessory No of off-street parking spaces Rezoning Rezoning The property shown on the attached exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein is currently zoned Agriculture Preserve This zoning designation is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the current use of the property which is single family residential We are requesting that the property be rezoned to Lakeshore Residential a residential zoning designation which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the current use of the property By way of background the property shown on the attached exlubit A was annexed to the City of Stillwater in 1996 pursuant to an annexation agreement between the City of Stillwater and the Town of Stillwater The property was suppose to be rezoned to a zoning classification that represented the current use of the property The AP zonmg is not consistent with its uses and allows uses which are not consistent with the area or adjacent zoning districts The area is currently used for single family residential homes A few of the properties within this area are larger (2-3 acres) and therefore capable of being subdivided into single family residential lots m order to properly and efficiently utilize municipal services within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area The Lakeshore Residential zoning classification would allow the properties to utilize appropnate setbacks which are consistent with residential single family homes Under the AP zoning the setbacks are greater because the district contemplated large lots which did not have the charactenstics of a urban neighborhood As a result of the annexation the property is clearly urban in character and the property owners are entitled to the appropnate zonmg classification The adjacent properties have substantially greater densities and most of the adjacent areas have been rezoned to residential or multi -family residential zoning classifications We are requesting that the property be rezoned to allow us to effectively and efficiently use our property The zoning classification will provide us with the appropnate setbacks and allow our respective property to be subdivided into single family residential lots consistent with the City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan and the adjacent properties We are also requesting that the City waive and refund to us the apphcation fees required for the rezoning as this expense to rezone the entire area should be born by the City and not an individual property owner The City has done this in the past for other property owners and given the annexation of the property it would certainly make sense to have the costs for the rezoning borne by the City MNDOT W W PLAT NO 82 83 Cm of STUW TER }r_� Rowe.. Ow read wrola w el r.wymer dun rms ewe wren _wytl.rpa Clardy � The wwe•• ewya a road b raw.o • wry rmym cony reovmlY b wry rmwle B}9 egg 1824 4 2e17 6� noy 051 �Sp 2606 $ 2663 ( 6 9 �t 28 �`! � 076 0 2664 927 f�a 2697� � H 'NOGL up 2 ^owe 1807 261/6 961 dAn _ F 1013 242 1102 1610 416 1624 Ile.moonisrapaa. GNAT Oft* Awn. OM IAA Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director V Date June 5, 2003 Subject Subdivision of 3 Acres of Land into Four Lots of 20,000 Square Feet Minimum Located at 12730 62nd Street North in the AP, Agricultural Preservation District Kevin and Roxanne Shoeberg, applicants Background This application is dependent upon the previous rezoning case If the rezoning is not approved, the subdivision cannot be approved because the proposed subdivision would not be consistent with zoning The application is to subdivide three acres into four lots of 94 acres (existing residence), 60 acres, 59 acres and 59 acres A 31 acre parcel along the existing park to the north is proposed for dedication to the city as an expansion of the existing park It is recommended that the shape of the dedicated park land be parallel to the rear lot to coordinate with further dedication on adjacent lots to the west line Urban services are available as shown on the subdivision preliminarily plat Water service is available in 62md Street North and sewer service is available from Long Lake Villas A grading, drainage, infiltration plan will be required before final plat approval Park and trail improvements are required according to the Park Dedication Policy as proposed and conditions Recommendation Approval (only is site is rezoned Lakeshore Residential, LR) Findings The proposed subdivision is consistent with Lakeshore Residential Zoning Conditions of Approval 1 Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as required by the City Engineer 2 A grading, drainage, infiltration plan shall be provided for City Engineer approval before final plat approval (Browns Creek Watershed District) 3 A paved trail shall be installed connecting 62nd Street to the Long Lake Villas trail on the adjacent city land 4 All lots shall be connected to city water and sewer service 5 Drainage impact fees shall be paid before final plat approval 6 Existing assessments shall be paid before final plat recording Location Map STATE HIGHWAY 36 ITION aim 1I WHammes R_IW RX,W RI9W R_W R_IW now Vicinity Map Scale In Feet ~ reel Read.aarm m.s.war *ti—a.+.Mid s wet kr tm Mew ah W - lam lama YIaia41a1tawl Oro,.OS= neafq Iowsrrs h i..a..* Marl `.awake a▪ 1 m� w PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Vanance Resubdmsion Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment x Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engmeenng fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal (0 e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application of supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 12730 - 62nd Street North Assessor's Parcel No nln 7n _ 43 n001 (GEO Code) Zoning District AP Description of Project Rezone to Lakeshore Residential "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, reformation and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify 1 will comply wit the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Kevtn & Roxanne Shoeberg Representative Mailing Address � 7 3 0 _ 6 2 nd s r' e No h Mailing Address City - State - Zip st , 11 water, MN 55087 City - State - Zip Telephone No . 51- 4 3 0- 9 0 3 8 Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Pnncipal Accessory Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces Rezoning Rezomng The property shown on the attached exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herem is currently zoned Agriculture Preserve This zoning designation is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the current use of the property which is single family residential We are requesting that the property be rezoned to Lakeshore Residential a residential zoning designation which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the current use of the property By way of background the property shown on the attached exhibit A was annexed to the City of Stillwater in 1996 pursuant to an annexation agreement between the City of Stillwater and the Town of Stillwater The property was suppose to be rezoned to a zoning classification that represented the current use of the property The AP zoning is not consistent with its uses and allows uses which are not consistent with the area or adjacent zoning districts The area is currently used for single family residential homes A few of the properties within this area are larger (2-3 acres) and therefore capable of being subdivided into single family residential lots in order to properly and efficiently utilize municipal services within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area The Lakeshore Residential zoning classification would allow the properties to utilize appropnate setbacks which are consistent with residential smgle family homes Under the AP zomng the setbacks are greater because the district contemplated large lots which did not have the charactenstics of a urban neighborhood As a result of the annexation the property is clearly urban in character and the property owners are entitled to the appropnate zoning classification The adjacent properties have substantially greater densities and most of the adjacent areas have been rezoned to residential or multi -family residential zonmg classifications We are requesting that the property be rezoned to allow us to effectively and efficiently use our property The zoning classification will provide us with the appropnate setbacks and allow our respective property to be subdivided into single family residential lots consistent with the City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan and the adjacent properties We are also requesting that the City waive and refund to us the apphcation fees required for the rezoning as this expense to rezone the entire area should be born by the City and not an individual property owner The City has done this in the past for other property owners and given the annexation of the property it would certainly make sense to have the costs for the rezoning borne by the City PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Vanance Resubdivision Y Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and eng►neermg fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal (0 e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 12730 - 62nd Street North Assessor's Parcel No 31.030.20.43 _ non 1 Lakeshore (GEO Code) Zoning DistnctRcsldcntial Description of Project N71 q, on "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply wit the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Kpvi n & Roxanne Shneherg Representative Mailing Address 1 2730 - 62nd Street North Mailing Address City - State - Zip Stillwater, MN 55082 City - State - Zip Telephone No 6 51-4 3 0- 9 0 3 8 Telephone No Signature _ Signature (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area 3.03 Acres SITE Height of Buildings Stories Feet Pnncipal Accessory (Signature is required) ND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM Mav 1 7nnz Long Lake View Estates Preliminary Plat Subdivision We are requesting that our property which is currently 3 03 acres m size be subdivided mto four (4) residential lots in a plat to be known as Long Lake View Estates The lots will range in size between 94 acres to 59 acres Each lot has between 89 and 140 feet of frontage on 62nd Street Lot 1 is currently occupied by our home The remaining three lots would be used for single family residential homes Private covenants would be placed on all four lots The lot sizes are consistent with the area and the Comprehensive Plan for the area Utihties for the property are available to the property The sanitary sewer line is currently in the northeast corner of the property Construction of a samtary sewer lme to serve all four lots would be along the northern portion of the lots This would serve the four lots and would allow the pipe to be extended in the future to area to the west The City water line runs adjacent to the southern boundary of the lots Lot 1 has the stub installed for the water service but we are proposing to be able to utilize the well on the property until such time that this is no longer adequate Lots 2 through 4 will be required to stub into the water tine of the City Gas and electric are available to the property and would be installed when construction occurs on each individual lot The lots would have ingress and egress driveways off of 62nd Street and some trees would be removed to gain access to each lot Each lot would have sufficient access to the public streets and utilities in the area As part of the subdivision we propose to dedicate additional land to the City along the northern boundary of the property which is adjacent to the City of Stillwater's current park area This will meet the park dedication requirement �r During construction of the lots each lot would have silt fence and necessary construction ' matenals installed to minimize the erosion until appropnate seedmg has stabilized the area The silt fence would be removed as directed by the City Engineer STUB (Future Connec or Parcels So f 62nd Street) PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-57 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 603 West Churchill Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Scott and Lisa DeMars Type of Application Variance Project Descnption A Variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required, 20 feet requested) for the construction of a garage Discussion The applicants are requesting a Vanance to the side yard setback to construct a 22 ft by 24 ft garage The existing garage is located 8 feet from the existing property line Part of the dnveway access pad to the garage is located on City nght of way The City is in the process of installing sidewalks in their area and parking their cars on the pad will not be an option To have a garage on this property, the access has to be off of Holcombe Street There is not enough space between the house and the property line to construct a dnveway off of Churchill Street They are showing the proposed garage on the attached site plan at the rear of the lot The neighbors' garage to the west of the applicant is located about 25 feet from the proposed garage There is a small shed on the property where the garage is proposed that will be demolished Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggests the following condition of approval 1 The architectural style, materials, and color match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of tlus title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings scoEt. arlet 1,c444--s (903 W. Cb tcr— hr` 1( . 6& GU Wei A4 ,v' sseP? 2. RC, Proe,25ed neu,9cx., e_. i/a.r1a.vice. relues-&- n 3 °x 6° 9 W1Nt-..--01,E -1°o44 'DooP_ 3o 1,U1 N6OW r-T i 2 z' ►1- 1��; `C.,A t..t'P :►t 1AN(1 4'271 IM1-1 I ______ f�J 1 I i I 1-- —I I r 1___ W�I-lT£ -retM I,t�f�ciL Done.. ' PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED FEES $50/200 $70/200 $100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $5 0+50/lot Zoning Amendment* $300 Planning Unit Development * $500 Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any appl,cabon All su submitted with appl�cat�on becomes the propertypporting material (i e, photos, sketches, etc) copies of supporting material is required If application isubmitted the to eof t,C City Councllwater il, twelven e (12)copies supporting material is required p s of A site plan is required with appl,cat,ons Any incomplete apphcat,on or supporting matenal will delay appbcat,on process ti PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project �TT-IA N I Assessor's Parcel No33 030 00s17 Zoning District Description of Project �Q�106e. �� Ss JQreye anA s/.ed 41e4(GEO Code) b„ 14 new o' +bock reoh s n ♦ e n s •' e "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, mformat,on and evidence submitted herewith in al respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply wit the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Sca Qrs Mailing Address 6'03 GLrat/ City - State - Zip Telephone No 1{3C— 0 g-iq. Signature (Signature Is required) Lot Size (dimensions& x ISo Land Area SOO Height of Buildings tories Feet Pnncipal Accessory L_ Special/Conditional Use Permit .X_Vanance Resubdivision _Subdivision* Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Budding floor area Existing ?9d Proposed Paved Impervious Area No of off-street parking square feet square feet a oic! - *.L-4' square feet NeW square feet spaces im con H bncnamaraksheilaT ANAPP FRM April 12 2002 Scott and Lisa DeMars 603 West Churchill Street Stillwater, MN 55082 May 22, 2003 Steve Russell, City Planner Stillwater Planning Commission City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Request for a "corner lot street" side yard set back variance 30' setback needed,askung for 20', setback variance of 10' Steve Russell and the Planning Commission, As you know, the City of Stillwater is making a lot of necessary road improvements this summer One of the streets included will be Holcombe Street, which runs on the east side of our property The proposed improvement includes widening the road approximately 1 foot, and addmg 5 foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the street Our existing garage is only 8 feet from the city's roadway easement and our 22' driveway is mostly on city property With the new sidewalks, we won't be able to park m our dnveway, as our vehicles would be parked over the new sidewakc Therefore, we need to move the garage, or build a new one m a different location With a 24' deep garage, a 50' wide lot, and a 5' side yard set back from the adjacent property, the garage would be approximately 20' from the city's roadway easement (12' further from the road than it currently is) We would be ehmmatmg a hundred year old 12 x 22 orngmal garage structure and removmg a poorly built 22 x 24 garage which is located within 8' of the house which could present fire code hazards under current buildmg code By grantmg this variance, the neighborhood would not be adversely affected for the following reasons The new garage street side set back would actually be greater than the exnstmg set back, and would be greater than many others m the area It would allow us, and our guests to contmue to park in the dnveway, instead of on the street, and Churchill and Holcombe are busy streets The new location is also further away from Churchill/Holcombe intersection If we build a new garage, it would have a more appealing extenor than the current garage Thank you for your time, Jr_.,-1,-P Scott and Lisa DeMars Ai, -,co„( , Notes: o Ind. #13774 iron pipe set • Ind. mon, found as noted. Bearing system is assumed datum. Offsets shown to existing structures are meas. to the outside building wall line, unless shown or noted otherwise. Underground or overhead public or private utilities, on or adjacent the parcels, were not located in conjunction with this survey, unless noted otherwise hereon. Overall parcel contains 15021 sq. ft., more or less. SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR: Scott and Lisa DeMars, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY BARRETT M. STACK STILLWATER, MINN. 55082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR Tel. No. 439-5630 603 West Churchill St., Stillwater, MN 55082 DESCRIPTION: As Supplied By Client: (copy of Doc. No. 994826, Wash. Co. records) Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcomb's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. 1 89.,.I s,, /O N k v° -- /1/89°Z9:30 "E -_ - So. 0 7T— — J a 3 It FU.-r u et_ lc T Z 9. G'4- Y LOT 2 79. rT N L N It .3'oy®z9 "s"A-kv // ti L Sr e/aa /00./1 -- or 50.07-- \\ :G✓HG.,c). a.Z'+ 1 /Z.o /7,7 /4-.5 N N /; t\ a N //o. /1/0. G03 2 �/DL/SE Z.4a. Lot-. aF OureioE .BLO4 / /Aii.G L// / �JYP/cy[� LOT N e CA,e,g k Tb BE R.L Moveb \ \\\ IU r KJ 24' B, r. -- _0.07 Al, ,40.0t /4 �. /ao /Z 4-01 x/ F^'' )e "/. /' zz N', /9w. A • ti Noe7y /"=Z0" i 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. , T /7o0, it/o. 4/649 Date...August..21.,..2002 Reg.No...1.37.7.4 If PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASK NO V/03-58 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 607 West Myrtle Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Michelle St Claire Type of Application Vanance Project Description A Vanance to the front yard setback (30feet required, 16 feet requested) for the construction of a entry overhang Discussion The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to the front yard setback to construct a entry overhang over the front steps The overhang would not extend any closer to the property line than the existing concrete steps The applicant has given several reasons in the attached letter why she needs protection over the stairway Mainly, she is getting water in her basement when it rains The water runs down the north face of the house and into the basement She hopes this entry will alleviate the problem Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The architectural style, materials, and color match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same distnct and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings 05/22/2003 08 23 4308810 CITY OF STILLWATER PAGE 02 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CTTY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED .�Special/Conditional Use Permit ✓_Variance �Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment' Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted In connection with any application All supporting matenal (1 e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (IS) copies of supporting material Is required /f application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A she plan Is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project i 0 7 r e S r i,: Asses-so�Parce�I ITo 2X - Zoning DistrictDescription of Project a.�) (GEO Code) Wti L¢ti a3 L 9 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submi ewlth in ail respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply witl the permit If it is granted and used Property Ownery l l /(1 - Sf % &lee, Representative_ Mailing Address_ 6,0 % tti M U p f /e. St, City - State - Zip Ja 4l/V 55City - State - zip_ Telephone No 5) �39- 956r3 signature�C�� (Signature Is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Principal Accessory Telephone No Signature Mailing Address (Signature Is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces Feet H \malamara\shella\PLANAPP FRM May 1, 2003 126 4 126 3 do,29) • 126 2 40128) 126 1 60127) 126 , 46 40,06 40110) 46 80 3 d0107) S 80 0I I2) 126 12 7 40,14) 126 dlls) 126 .0118) 126 53 • a, -r 11 134m2l) V ATED STREIT DO • 265745 104 10 40000 W 1- W w co 40 40 �-r 9 8 dams BERNHE 1 40 60 IME 40 601 4353 A Ou ) 401es) 4353 4353 4,0137) 4353 01 435 6 do128 434 435 5 434 14 2953 4 14 295y 435 40124) 414 435 14 435 1 F 414 61 a doles) I126 iZ 126 ^' 01 8 7 1 0067) S 126 & I 126 10 6 f 126 I\l/ 9 f D 126 12 5e (p70)8) r 126 11 126 I 9i J 14 7 126 13 126 v fD 126�6 2 r 126 6 YI i126 440146) 4• 4 4. 47 §,o74s) 126 S 8 11 126 • 126 4710,) S 126 53 10 401029 e' 61 126 126 8 1aot35) Po) S f126 7 14 126 126 1 13 7 0 126 to 60 W LINE OF BLK 2 126 126 18 126 down) 17 126 dooa WI 4007I) 126 1 126 own) 5 126 93 72 1 2 4 S 5 d S 72 126 10 40733) 126 12 126 54 1 40088) 1 * 8 126 07 d804) 1 .L.-T 9 12503 126 3 (008 126 0090) 126 128 1 26 1�92) 126 13 126 DEDICATED STREET PER PLAT OF THOMPSON PARKER & MOWERS SECOND ADD ION 40 43 7 6 40004 R'S ADIITI 40 43 40 40 Yy5 40003 40 3 40 2 40 40 40 40 40 0 o I30 43 17 40 11 40 40 TO STILLWAT i to 9 40 I 8 40012) 40 7 40 R 6 40011) 30 5 10 40 4 40610) 40 3 40 2 elm 40 1 Location Map b AREA NOT GEOCODED 14 0090) 27 2 41 72 12 30 5 20 STREET 11 40 10 60087) 50 35 50 50 13 co a 12 1 2 10 22 doom 6� -a 3 0 R_IW 0-OW ROW R_W R_)W R_OW Vicinity Map 0 126 Scale in Feet The etsing rem., con.atei Nn9 C..C..deem W ▪ ear .d ti-.,s 01., Menne. Clem la Weene.e,wu.,®..,d. • 4....4a4400..a.10. cum. wee. 0. wfllo� MICHELLE ST CLAIRE May 23 2003 To the City of Stillwater Planning Commission I am requesting a vanance from the City of Stillwater to build a small porch on the front of my home at 607 W Myrtle Street I have enclosed a diagram of the proposed addition The reasons for this request are *My current concrete steps are detenorating and need to be replaced (They currently extend 42 out from my front door and are 48 wide) I would like to replace them with wooden steps the depth would remain at 42 but I would like to extend them to 120 wide *I am getting a large amount of water in my basement when it rains The water runs down the north face of my house because there is no roof over this part of the house I would like to add a 42 x 120 roof with support posts over the proposed step area. *My mail gets soaked every time it rams The proposed new roof would prevent this from happening I have discussed this proposed addition with both of my immediate neighbors and neither have any problem with my building the porch on my home (I have enclosed statements from both of them sharing their feelings) An added note My neighbor to the East Cindy Nord has a similar porch on the front of her home By adding my porch our two porches would be the same distance from the main sidewalk Thank you for your consideration on this project and look forward to discussing it with you at your June 9th meeting Sincerely k Olai)Lt) Michelle St Claire 607 W Myrtle Street Top view' • L W Current s'airs concre%e.k4-h€y re pr) ()( 48) Pro posed rep Inee.imerit of steps Wood and widen•xW A roof would be. also be. placed over Thee, top step kre��y The s-teps are. e or rer*-1 would stay sue. "the_ house. -Lha-t- 4voutd Q.l so rernai n the sa,v32. 10` from 4-he, si dewcctK, --}rot steps cu_rrerit e.�fi-endl -10 mains, walk Prope.rb1 t, Ytz, i I 2 l icd' Curr stps J20 col i d i i►tie. Yefres.enfs ori ins l Sirv,�c.fure Iiskci line represents prciosed�gdd_nt-imh i;. r�re5er�t5 profod posts fold, tke_ r-ma-€ gyp. Vrort Vt ern/ -From the �tre�t main S� dsz w«.I V. QI--- prope rt-y 11 L-- ��1 4-2."x� , (42.» x6:1) Dokble.. Dtsh&i I 112.refreSe{'1fS 412- proptcl ro\ovf (qfx IVY) 5-aa-Os YY L _2.cc-v \ a -ac-- - -v-, _ cam- t,vous_c-Q Cri-e,,,,- A-t_ iy\.),4,-- cLis- -(LeJ- .5,cc-c, _ n/L urV_k_x_ _ _ _ -S/L.c_5`_T- a-vv, 0)-.o3L ' .Lvti 3 p May 22nd 2003 To Whom it May Concern, We have no objections with Michelle St Claire budding a roof onto her porch or any other construction that needs to be completed based on the water issues associated with her home Thank You Patrick & Christine Welsh 617 Myrtle Street Stillwater MN 55082 r y PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-59 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 522 West Oak Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name Mark Balay, representing applicant Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (20 feet required 11 requested) and to the side yard setback (6 feet required, 5'6" requested) for the construction of a front porch Discussion The owner of the above residence has asked Mark Balay to prepare a concept design for removal of the existing covered stoop that is deteriorating, for something that is more functional, aesthetically pleasing and histoncally sensitive The proposal is for a new 6ft porch across the south front of the house The design is intended to replicate as much as possible, the original porch which appears on several old turn of the century plat maps attached to the house This replacement will require encroaching one foot further into the front yard than the house to the immediate west on Oak St It will also encroach 6 inches into the side yard setback on the east in order t line up with the existing southeast corner of the house Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval The architectural style, materials, and color match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings t Planning Admin Form Page 1 of 2 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 430-8820 Action Requested Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Umt Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No Fee $70 $50/$200 $25 $500 $70/$200 $500 $300 $100+$50/lot $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see Step 3, Filing the Application) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Address of Project Zomng District PROPLR 1 Y WEN 111U 1CA 1 1ON o O A g s 772 7— Assessor's Parcel No o/�f Ot9.319p030098 Descnption of Project Pop -( D) -)zD J is /- 11/4P K 7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct If further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner KARL- 1,1E4tIM RepresentativeHAltK5 Brif.Hy �L_NIm-c ST,� Mailing Address 522 w OAK- ST , 5rtt ua mg Address l i oF- H ypaij sir i,L ._1 Telephone No��1)St - 3 g t F32 Telephone No bra - o — 3 Signature 2x� Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) b 1' x lgJ' Total building floor Area _j/0 ewigota ft Land Area W 5' i 5,f Height of Buildings Stones - - Feet Principal--- - 2 - 2_ Existing sq ft Proposed ilda c440)4}Sg ft Paved Impervious Area IVA. sq ft http //www ci stillwater mn us/cityhall/departments/comm_dev/planform html 5/21/2003 r• t Mark S Balay AIA , t e r hl i n n c sot 110 East Myrtle Street Suite 100 Stillwater Minnesota 55082 (651) 430 3312 5/23/03 City of Stillwater Community Development Department 216 N Fourth St Stillwater, MN 55082 Michael E Balay AIA Indian a p o I i s 1 r d r 1 6801 Lake Pla a Drive Suite C 305 Indianapolis Indiana 46220 (317) 845 9402 RE 522 W Oak St / Variance Request Enclosed are all matenal to support our request for your approval The owner of 522 W Oak St must replace or repair an existing covered front stoop He has asked us to prepare a concept design for removal of the old solution and installation of a more functional, aesthetically pleasing , and historically sensitive solution The proposed project will include installation of a new 6 ft deep porch across the south front of the house The design is intended to replicate as much as possible, the original porch which appears on several old turn of the century plat maps, attached to the house This replacement will require encroach one foot further into the front yard than the house to the immediate west on Oak st and also six inches into the side uard requirement on the east ►norder to line up with the existing south east corner of the house We find this to be a continued step forward for another Stillwater historical residence, and ask for you support of all necessary approvals and variances to carry out this project Please do not hesitate calling if you have any question or require additional information Sincerely, Mark S Balay 8 1 �1) 126 8 103 126 9 126 12 126 14 doom) 126 11 126 8 13 126 10 14 13 0090) 27 2 417 25 25 25 12 8 20 STREET 11 2 ewer 40 8 10 4p0e7) 60 8 g) 1 1651 t o 7 16651 g g 10 i 165 10e2) 165 g 12 whibi 165 1 16006q 165 g t— 49 1649 ) ns 8 8 40000) 3 6 13°55) 5 4) WE1 STEZS ADDI" 'ION 20 30 J50 50 50 50 3 doom) 70 7 505 00) m 0 00 W W cc 0 1 W m 2 0 U -J 0 30 812 I03971' (( 098) rJ 8 '1 g 50 10_ 2 4Y 5o 9 4 4o0e� 2 50 TO 8 40094) A STILLWATER P-7 71 _ -T-+ 50 6 f0o9N II 50 5 (pm- vi 25 �4 5 25 g 50 `—' 3 a 59 2 0 ip:o942 50 1 62 60 122 61 60 62 122 0052) g 0 6 iW44) 0 f0045) F 7 _ wow ERDINANL 410047) SC 410049) 9 &050) ACRE 10 1006) m 8 (0053) ,2 10 ADDITION TO TIE CITY OF STIILWA'ER 122 130 35 8) 5186 2 1301 130 52 5186 6 5186 77) 4 40042) 122 130 35 140on) 3 122 50 f w 'Si3o2 LQA CO 32 93 1301 19 52 r0075) 70 79 4 8 40076) 5186 Location Map 50 An 1 50 33 2 Sato) 62 1590� 2� 1?jpon) 150 3 11410071) 502 Po7 8 410052) .1.-••••••44 dt•-••••••* 50 33 50 33 1 4039) APPARENT GAP 122 502 5033 150 2 150 3 iimon 3 150.E 502 9T 50 33 g 50 4 50 33 0 0 30 25 25 25 co 662 40137) BAA 106) 6.05 15 R_IW R2OW R19W R_W R_)W R2OW Vicinity Map 0 133 Scale in Feet 'aMum we .m — .nd 9.am4419 wemgm Cary no b.e Wwoew Cary Sawn. 091c• 9.0 ba.., 1 � We � k T PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-60 Planning Commission Date June 9, 2003 Project Location 106 East Chestnut Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Mark Balay representing The Mortgage Company Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (15 feet required, 11 feet requested) for the re -construction of a porch and accessibility ramp Discussion The applicant was asked by the owner to prepare a concept design that would remove the existing complicated ramp system that was installed several years ago, and replace it with a functional, aesthetically pleasing, histoncally sensitive solution The solution includes three main elements 1 A replicated wrap around 9 foot deep porch on the south side of the building, designed in the same matter as the existing histoncal building There would also be a traditional set of wooden steps in front of the main entry (see attached plan) 2 A "bridge" walkway from the public sidewalk to the entrance of the building 3 An additional parking space will be created for short-term deliveries to the building Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval The architectural style, materials, and color match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and, riot materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affpct #ie Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plans/Photos HPC Action Approval +6-0 w/condition — All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC r J PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED special/Conditional Use Permit \ Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance The fees for requested action are attached to this application *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal (► e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required if application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 01 80.30c7OP O (oL} Address of Protect I 0 to £ GF/A-5T14117' 17P 7 Assessor's Parcel No n1 0 Z ��°°.}}�� ���� (GEO Code) Zoning Distriq Description of Protect_f6 nG/-1 MOP 1710N 'I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. 1 further certdy l will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner ,7o3-IN 14 -y Representative h1ARK 5 (9/4I.d4YA j Ti5C-13) Ilk Mailing Address 1 Ob C 4 jt/vr 5T Mailing Address 11 6 E r2 >'/21LE Sr City - State - Zip STfu,14ft77 P) j-1 /\1 £5vp,..1___. City - State - Zip57-1l4,4441T-12- — N1l( — 55052_ Telephone No bS 1—it 3 0- 7 9 ad Signature (Sig quired) Lot Size (dimensions) /55 x 100 Land Area Telephone No 651- 4-3 0- 3 31 2-- Signature ( ignature is required SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area Existing Height of Buildings Pnncipal Accessory Stories square feet square feet Proposed quire feet Paved Impervious Area quare,feet No of off-street parking s Location Map RIW ROW RI9W R_W RIW ROW Vicinity Map Scale in Feet ION & q um mot al ma.r.a. me Mon _mood. d. II, nom. tome Wog,. Corry &Ws woar tot, WoOontico Casty m t000moltio to toy norm* m... wd... oa.c.m.y m iny.r. ITa Prom OSS 1430-® Mark S Balay AIA II r it r NI 110 East Myrtle Street Suite 100 Stillwater Minnesota 55082 (651) 430 3312 5/23/03 n n 5 0 t 9 City of Stillwater Community Development Department 216 N Fourth St Stillwater, MN 55082 Michael E Balay AIA I n d i 9 n 9 p o I i s 1 n (1 r e 6801 Lake Plaza Drroe Suite C 305 Indianapolis Indiana 46220 (317) 845 9402 RE 106 E Chestnut/ Design Review and Variance Request Enclosed are all matenal to support our request for your approval The owner of 106 E Chestnut must replace or repair an existing complicated entry ramp system that was installed several years ago, due to deterioration He has asked us to prepare a concept design for removal of the old solution and installation of a more functional, aesthetically pleasing , and historically sensitive solution The proposed project will include three main elements 1) a replicated wrap around 9 ft deep porch on the south side of the building executed with the same historical details that make up the existing building There would also be a traditional set of wooden steps in front of the main entry as depicted in plan 2) A bridge" walkway from the public sidewalk which will improve accessibility to the entrance of the building 3) The creation of an additional parking stall for the building which shall be used to get delivery/ short term vehicles off Chestnut St We find this to be a continued step forward for a building which was one of the earliest rehabilitations in downtown Stillwater, and ask for you support of all necessary approvals and vanances to carry out this project Please do not hesitate calling if you have any question or require additional information Sincerely.. mil/ Mark S Bala 12 13 150 3 .0087) P088) 150 150 140108) 2 8 31 Location Map 17 ice) 400 g0 ooso)15 40061)14 g0 0 40062) o 10 60 40 010s rn 40103) GEOCODE REF 150 4 393) 494) 40125) ' n i 9 w 0 9 — — 40095) O Te, '-', 50 2 0 40096) / 0 N 0 0 0 0 40100) 150 10 0107) 8 N 40740) 4 40098) 5 45 25 23 49 5 401106 e0111)� 0 60 1o081) 2- 60083)0 26 50 50 100 40111) 4 6 50�- 1o0 L� _ 40113) S1 JO �P 25 - 3 R_ I%% R.ON RI 8 R. N R[IP RtDA Vicinity Map 0 92 cale In Feet r' ,r era.rc�vw y Ry..-a m a� �w�wa uxs rgl Feu > .ƒj a&■ A& -\ \ n�/\{t : \in \■ #�m.� 040 : k■ } l k \: \i fA\ j\ PULL -IN / DROP OFF EXISTING BUILDING A / / / / /I RAMP I I PUVVER 4. COURT YARD AREA A 3R STD -FT EST\,_,T STRFET PULL -IN / DR❑P ❑EE EXISTING BUILDING / / / / / / / / / \ / \ / \ / \ PLANTER RAMP PLANTER a w U c J 94 2 • • • wr1 C X r N t7 —1 GI GI Z Z IL. SIDEWALK EAST EST\ T STREET 9 DWG aax o-n._ T/w Marl is Still t VI 1 JOHN HARVEY 106 EAST CHESTNUT ST STILLWATER MINNESOTA lit �mAPIEP q > p pw 'meo. p DMA Drum err o¢CI® en IIARI( MlE IN? SCR T1DN ALA Y Marts May eu N,,, 1 REVB DMA umo¢crs PPas it 430-o 3312 9 I d p II I a MEMORANDUM To Planning Commission Fr Sue Fitzgerald, City Planner Date June 9, 2003 Re Case No SUP/03-62 Case No SUP/03-62 — The applicant has tabled his request until a further date PLI Article "Understanding Spot Zoning," by Robert C Widner Page 1 of 2 PlannersWej, vv-ww.planncrsw eb.com PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL Planning Law Primer: Understanding Spot Zoning by Robert C. Widner, Esq. Other Articles Online "Understanding Spot Zoning" is included in our .Ph'nninij Law'Prirner printed collection of articles 11+rum 1ssuc 13 pagc 17 of the PCJ Winter 19941 Most planning commissioners have heard the impassioned cry that rezoning decision will constitute an invalid "spot zoning " This llegation particular typically arises where the community is considering the rezoning of a single lot or small parcel of property held by a smgle owner and the rezoning will permit land uses not available to the adjacent property Because spot zoning often focuses on the single parcel without considenng the broader context, that is, the area and land uses surrounding the parcel, it is commonly considered the antithesis of planned zoning While rezoning decisions that only affect a single parcel or small amount of land are most often the subject of spot zoning claims (as opposed to rezonmgs of larger areas), a locality can lawfully rezone a single parcel if its action is shown to be consistent with the community's Iand use policies As I will discuss shortly, courts look to the community's comprehensive plan, or to other planning studies, in determining whether the rezoning is, in fact, consistent with local land use policies Of course, whether a particular rezoning constitutes an unlawful spot zonmg depends largely upon the facts surrounding the zoning decision and upon the judicial decisions of each state However, courts commonly note that the underlying question is whether the zoning decision advances the health, safety, and welfare of the community A zoning decision that merely provides for individual benefit without a relationship to public benefit cannot be legally supported Where a particular zoning decision is not supported ulic purpose, the zoning decision is arbitrary and may be subject to invalidation as unlawful spot zoning http //www plannersweb com/articles/wid060 html 6/4/2003 PUJ Article "Understanding Spot Zoning," by Robert C Widner Page 2 of 2 Although courts throughout the nation differ in their specific approaches when reviewing spot zoning claims, the majority consider 1 the size of the parcel subject to rezoning, 2 the zoning both pnor to and after the local government's decision, 3 the existing zoning and use of the adjacent properties, 4 the benefits and detriments to the landowner, neighboring property owners, and the community resulting from the rezoning, and 5 the relationship between the zoning change and the local government's stated land use policies and objectives This last factor -- the relationship of the rezoning decision to the community's land use policies and objectives -- is perhaps the most important one As a result, when a planning commission (or governing body) initially considers a rezoning request it should determine whether the request is consistent with the comprehensive or master plan Many communities' zoning codes also require a separate planning study that examines the ments of the proposed rezoning This further ensures that any rezoning is consistent with the community's land use objectives, and not a case of spot zoning The bottom line is that courts will give considerable weight to evidence that the locality's rezoning decision reflects thoughtful consideration of planning factors It should be noted that there is one situation where a rezoning decision that does not conform to the comprehensive plan may nevertheless be upheld That is where there is evidence showing significant changes in the community since the adoption of the plan that would justify a rezoning of the property This is especially true where a review of other factors, such as benefit to the community and the size of the rezoned parcel, indicate that the rezoning was not merely intended to confer a benefit to the property owner Please note that this article is copynght protected by the Planning Commissioners Journal You are welcome to download or pnnt the article for your own personal use -- or to provide a link to this article from another Web site For other use of the article, please contact the Plannin Commissioners Journal PlannersWeb ww:planncrsweb:coin PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL http //www plannersweb com/articles/wid060 html 6/4/2003 what is spot zoning? Page 1 of 3 FreeAdvice Looking for a MORTGAGE? Home - Find a Lawyer - Law Bulletin Boards - Legal Forms - s 11111111.1 WHAT IS SPOT ZONING? Spot zoning occurs when a small area of land or section in an existing neighborhood is singled out and placed in a different zone from that of nei hbonn g property For example, a park or school might be allowed in a stnctly residential area if it serves a useful purpose to the neighborhood residents In some areas of the country the courts have found spot zoning illegal on the ground that it is incompatible with the existing land use -zoning plan or in an overall zoning scheme for the community Whether the exception carved out is reasonable and supported by the facts, often turns on public interest, the effect the spot zoning has on the current uses of neighboring properties, and any ramifications created by the zoning leis Question -> WHAT IS SpnT ZnyING? -> WHAT IS CONTRACT ZONING? — > WHAT IS DOWN ZONING? —> WHAT IS ESTHETIC ZONING? — > WHAT IS A SUBDIVISION? —> WHAT IS BUFFER ZONING? Click Here for More Q&As in Real Estate Law ( Zoning Related Topics I Agricultural Law I Sell A Homo I Commercial Real Estp+o I Constructbn I Condemnation I Landbrd �� T L+ I Mortgage Matters I Zoning For All Legal Topics Click Here Find A Lawyer Find a Qualified Attorney at AttorneyPages com The Leading Lawyer Directory for Consumers and Small Business Endorsed by FreeAdvice com Get a Le al Form Enter a key term and select your state All States and US and US All States Special Offers Looking for a Great Deal on a Loan? Mortgage Loans Home Equity Loans Refinance Realty Services Loans links 411.11111111111110 Use the pull down menu to find a lawyer who can help you Find Zoning and Condemnation I lawyers in 'Alabama I Find a Lawyer I Q&A Law Forums I Legal Chat Live! I State Law Center 1 Legalaa1 Links (Le Articles ( ( Media I Free Email I Site Ma g I Privacy Policy I About Us I Contact Us I Post Your Case 1 FreeAdvice is the leading legal site for consumers and small businesses It provides general legal information to help people understand their legal nghts in 100 legal topics but is not a substitute for personal legal advice from an attomey You are welcome to view FreeAdvice for your own personal non-commeraal purposes AS IS subject to our disclaimer and conditions of use FreeAdvice is a unit of Advice Company (c) http //www real -estate -law freeadvice com/zomng/spot_zoning htm 6/4/2003 51`.1c / ft/ -e"-6 - : .isir-, Ammic=seozsr.r...*— arestec:•:_ i >c? • 11 _s Li 8 r itglAce ;00+ Pr 1.n4— Oij hOl 'v- " Pr 61or•t+ 915 W S -t)oc\Ov"-C, (17 13 5 t