Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-14 CPC PacketI water. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, April 14, 2003, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of March 17, 2003 AGENDA 1 Case No SUP/03-26 A special use permit for a mini storage facility located in the Business Park Industrial District, BP -I on the southeast corner of Curve Crest Blvd and Industrial -Blvd Steve Gaffney, applicant (Continued from the March 17, 2003 Meeting) 2 Case No ZAM/03-01 A Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment for properties located at the corner of Orleans Street and Greeley Street from RA, Single Family Residential to RB, Duplex Residential, Multifamily Medium Density, RCM City of Stillwater, applicant 3 Case No PUD/03-27 Planned Unit Development for 226 housing units, 15,000 - 20,000 square feet of retail/office space, 340 under ground parking spaces, landscaped archeological green, perimeter trail and interpretation area located at 608 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District Terra Springs, LLC, applicant 4 Case No SV/03-01 A street vacation request for a 330 foot portion of unimproved Meadowlark Drive (south of McKusick Lake) from Center Street to extended unimproved North Sherburne Street Tony Mutter, applicant 5 Case No SV/03-02 A street vacation request for a 200 foot portion unimproved North Sherburne Street between McKusick Lake and extended unimproved Meadowlark Drive Tony Mutter, applicant 6 Case No V/03-28 A variance to the front yard setback (30 required, 10'6" requested) for the construction of an addition to existing residence located at 308 North 3rd Street in the RB, Duplex Residential District Jim and Lee Thompson Kent 7 Case No V/03-29 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 23 feet requested) for the construction of a two -stall attached garage at 504 Greeley Street South in the RB, Duplex Residential District Ryan and Mya Williams, applicants 8 Case No V/03-30 A variance to the rear and side yard setbacks (5 feet required, 2'3" requested) for construction of a new garage at 712 3rd Street South in the RB, Duplex Residential District Kris and Bruce Amundson-Gritters, applicant CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 9 Case No V/03-31 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 12 feet requested) and bluff setback (100 feet required, 81 feet requested) for construction of a single family residence in the RB, Duplex Residential District and Blufand/Shoreland Overlay District at 122 Lakeside Drive Matthew McGuire and Andrea Saterbak, applicants 10 Case No V/03-32 A variance to the street setback requirement (30 feet required, 20 feet requested) for construction of a second story addition over existing residence located at 523 West Moore Street in the RB, Duplex Residential District Erica Fultz, applicant 11 Case No V/03-33 A variance to the RB, Duplex Residential District density requirement, 1 unit per 7,500 square feet allowed, 2 units per 7,500 square feet requested located at 320 North 2nd Street Deborah Asch, applicant 12 Case No SUP/03-34 A special use permit for transfer of existing three guest room bed and breakfast to new owners with no change in operation located in the RB, Duplex Residential District located at 704 South 1st Street Ronald and Cynthia Hannig, applicants Other Items CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Chairperson Hultman called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m Present Commissioners Hultman, Gag, Middleton, Peroceschi, Teske, Tumquist, and Council Representative Junker Late Arrivals Commissioner Ranum (arrived at 7 30 p m ) Absent Commissioner Wald Others Community Development Director Russell APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion made by Council Representative Junker, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to approve the February 10, 2003 commission minutes Motion carried unanimously Case No V/03-19 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 26 feet requested) for the construction of an addition to a residence located at 2938 Marine Circle in the RA, Single Family Residential District Perry and Carol Parendo, applicants Ms Parendo requested a variance to the front yard setback to expand the entryway (currently 3' by 6', new entryway would be 6' by 8') and to increase the size of the garage by moving the wall 3 feet forward The proposed entry way would create a front yard setback of 26 feet instead of the required 30 feet The addition to the garage would create a 28-foot setback instead of the required 30 feet setback from the property line Ms Parendo informed the Commissioner that the current entryway is not functional and the expansion would not protrude any further than the existing over hang Commissioner Middleton stated that the expansion would not be easily noticeable since the home is located on a cul-de-sac Motion made by Council Representative Junker, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to approve the variance to the front yard setback for the construction of an addition to a residence located at 2938 Marine Circle, with the following condition 1 The addition shall be similar in style, materials and colors as the main structure 1 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Motion passed 7 fore, 1 against Case No PUD/03-14 Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval for an 11 87 acre Liberty Village Development Design located in the V-C, Village Commercial Zoning District at the corner of CR 15 and 12 Contractor Properties, applicant Community Development Director Russell gave and overview of the Comprehensive Plan for the audience Homer Tomkins and Mark Puttnum gave a detailed overview of the PUD (design detail and guidelines, traffic, drainage, and land use) There was much concern about the impact the development would have on traffic Bill, 9, was concerned about the traffic impact and the bank drive through He was informed that the Comprehensive Plan calculated for the increase in traffic Pauline, 241 9, expressed her concern about the traffic, the additional water flow and the impact it would have on nature Felt the bank is not beneficial Sue, 121 9, was also concerned about traffic and the additional fumes from the cars, the gas station and the bank drive through She was also concerned about the garbage collection times for the bank and gas station Paula Croaning, stated she is looking forward to the commercial development Motion made by Council Representative Junker, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to approve the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval for an 11 87 acre Liberty Village Development Design located in the V-C, Village Commercial Zoning District at the corner of CR 15 and 12 Motion passed 7 fore, 1 against Case No SUB/03-15 Preliminary plat approval for subdivision of an 11 87 acre site into 9 lots and one Outlot A ranging in size from 35 to 1 47 acres located in the VC, Village Commercial Zoning District at the corner of CR 15 and 12 Contractor Properties, applicant The subdivision establishes easements, trail ways and right of ways Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the Preliminary plat approval for subdivision of an 11 87 acre site into 9 lots and one Outlot A ranging in size from 35 to 1 47 acres located in the VC, Village Commercial Zoning District at the corner of CR 15 and 12 with the following conditions 2 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 1 A detailed PUD framework landscape plan shall be prepared for approval and installation as a part of the subdivision 2 The nght of ways along CR 15 and 12 shall be dedicated to the City 3 County Road 15 trail improvements shall be installed as part of the subdivision 4 Perpendicular on street parking shall be provided for the retail sites 2 and 3 but no the residential site 5 Motion passed unanimously Case No SUP/03-16 A special use permit (final PUD approval) for a convenience, commercial gas station and car wash, 4,428 square feet and 1,665 square feet, respectively, located at the corner of CR 15 and 12 in the VC, Village Commercial Zoning District Contractor Properties, owner, Scott Teigen, Convenience Stores, applicant - Mr Teigen requested a special use permit for a 4,428 square foot Kwik Trip store, fuel pumps with canopy and a 1,592 +/- square foot car wash The plans submitted include a site plan, a landscape plan and elevation drawing The proposal attempts to keep within the New England style of Liberty Village The color themes of the buildings are "Crockery Cream" siding, gables and dormers will be "Muslin White", fascia accent "Colonial red" with white trim The single bay carwash was designed to resemble a covered bridge The fuel canopy will have dark shingles on the roof Lighting for the pump will be recessed into the ceiling of the canopy The landscape plan is consistent with the landscaping of Liberty Village All mechanical equipment, trash receptacles will be screened from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures There was no lighting plan submitted The light fixtures on the buildings and the lights above the signs are "goose neck" colonial fixtures There was some concern amongst the Commission with the hours of operation of the store and car wash Commissioner Peroceschi did not see a problem with the gas station being open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week Chairperson Hultman recommended that the gas station close at 11 00 pm and then be pay at the pump during the night Commissioner Ranum also thought the gas station should close at 11 00 pm 3 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Mr Teigen informed that Commission that if the hours of operation are restricted they may not do the project Council Representative Junker and Commissioner Middleton were concerned about the noise from the car wash blower Mark Puttnum informed the Commissioner that proper landscaping would limit the amount of noise Mark, 135 Rutherford, inquired about the number of carwash bays, hours of operation and the type of lighting on the canopy Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve the special use permit (final PUD approval) for a convenience, commercial gas station and car wash, 4,428 square feet and 1,665 square feet, respectively, located at the corner of CR 15 and 12 with the gas stations hours of operation from 6 am to 12 am in addition to the following conditions 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 A lighting plan showing fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shield from direct view and protected from damage by vehicles 3 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 4 Continuos concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas form landscaped areas 5 Handicapped parking paces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and stalled before final inspection of the project 6 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 7 The trash enclosures shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project 8 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 9 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 10 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 11 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before budding permits are issued 4 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 12 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, excluding directional signs 13 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 14 All security lights on the building shall be downlit 15 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Community Development Director 16 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 17 Lighting for fuel pumps shall be recessed in the ceiling of the canopy 18 The hours of operation for the car wash shall be 7 00 am to 10 pm Motion failed 1 fore, 7 against Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Council Representative Junker to approve the special use permit (final PUD approval) for a convenience, commercial gas station and car wash, 4,428 square feet and 1,665 square feet, respectively, located at the corner of CR 15 and 12 with the following conditions 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 A lighting plan showing fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shield from direct view and protected from damage by vehicles 3 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 4 Continuos concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas form landscaped areas 5 Handicapped parking paces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and stalled before final inspection of the project 6 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 7 The trash enclosures shall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project 8 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 9 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 5 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 10 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 11 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 12 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, excluding directional signs 13 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 14 All security lights on the building shall be downlit 15 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Community Development Director 16 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 17 Lighting for fuel pumps shall be recessed in the ceiling of the canopy 18 The hours of operation for the car wash shall be 7 00 am to 10 pm Motion passed 7 fore, 1 against Case No SUP/03-17 A special use permit (final PUD approval) for a 4,805 square foot bank with drive through located in the VC, Village Commercial Zoning District at the corner of CR 15 and 12 First State Bank, owner, Kanman Companies, applicant The applicant requested a special use permit for a proposed 4,8000 square foot bank with a drive through located in Liberty Village on the southeast corner of Manning Avenue and 75m Avenue The materials are mainly brick and cedar shingles There will be 24 parking spaces including one handicap parking space The mechanical equipment and trash will be screened from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures The landscape plan is by Westwood Management The lighting on the site maintains the character of the budding by using a decorative fixture with a "new England" style The fixture will be 15 feet high Two signs are proposed, a monument sign and a freestanding sign The 5-foot monument sign is culture stone and will be lit with ground lights The freestanding sign is also 5 feet high This is a wooden sign and will not be lit The hours of operations will be 7 am to 6 pm during the week and 8 am to 12 pm on Saturdays 6 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to approve the special use permit (final PUD approval) for a 4,805 square foot bank with drive through located in the VC, Village Commercial Zoning District at the corner of CR 15 and 12 with the following conditions 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 3 Continuos concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas form landscaped areas 4 Handicapped parking paces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and stalled before final inspection of the project 5 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 6 The trash enclosures shall be made of a sufficient or opaque material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project 7 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated in the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during construction activity 8 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 9 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 10 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 11 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 12 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 13 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 14 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 15 All security lights on the building shall be downlit 16 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Community Development Director 17 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 18 Canopy lights shall be recessed 19 Additional window shall be added to extend the wall 7 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Motion passed unanimously Case No SUP/03-20 A special use permit for a clinical therapy home business located at 620 West Oak Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Kay Flesner, applicant Ms Flesner requested a special use permit to operate a clinical therapy business out of her home Ms Flesner would be seeing people with a mental health diagnosis, martial problems, parenting and life adjustment issues for assessment, diagnosis and treatment The clientele will be primarily be adults, with an occasional child with their parents as well as adolescents Most often the applicant see on person at a time or couples The sessions are 50 minutes long The hours will be limited to no more than 20 per week There are two off street parking places The clinics hours will be Monday through Thursday from 10 am to 8 pm Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Peroceschi to approve the special use permit for a clinical therapy home business locate at 620 West Oak Street with the following conditions 1 No outside storage or display of products equipment or merchandise is permitted 2 Any retail sales must be accessory or incidental to the primary residential use 3 Customer must be scheduled by appointment 4 Off street parking must be provided for customers 5 No signs are permitted 6 Not more than 20% of the total gross floor area of the dwelling unit may be used for the Home Occupation or 400 square feet, whichever is less 7 Business hours are limited to the period of 7 00 am to 8 00 pm 8 No nonresident employees are permitted 9 No traffic that is greater then the normal residential area within the neighborhood 10 Type II Home Occupations are subject to review upon complaints from the neighborhood If in the opinion of the Zoning Administrator the complaints are substantial, a public hearing must be held at which time additional conditions may be added to this Special Use Permit or in the alternative, the Type II Home Occupation permit may be revoked Motion passed unanimously Case No V/03-22 A variance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 2 feet requested) for the construction of a two stall attached garage at 501 West 8 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Hancock Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Scott and Cindy Van Meerten, applicant Mr and Mrs Van Meerten requested a variance to the front yard setback to construct an attached 25 ft by 26 ft two car garage Mr and Mrs VanMeeten requested the structure be built two feet from the property line Mr and Mrs VanMeeten would like to build the garage 25 ft by 26 ft to make the rooflines match Because of budding codes the garage must be built more than three feet from the property line Commissioner Ranum was concerned about the additional water run off onto the neighbor's property The affected neighbor gave his full support of the project Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve the variance to the side yard setback for the construction of a two -car garage located at 501 West Hancock Street with the following conditions 1 The furthest point of the structure shall not be within one foot of the east property line 2 The garage shall be similar in style, colors and materials as the main structure 3 Drainage from the roof shall remain onsite 4 The existing one car garage shall be removed Motion passed unanimously Case No SUP/03-23 A special use permit for 125 seat restaurant with a variance for parking located at 601 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District Todd Weiss, applicant Mr Weiss requested a special use permit for a 125 seat restaurant and a variance to the required parking The restaurant will occupy the existing budding and the museum will be housed in the addition The museum addition will be 36 feet by 60 feet located on the south side A 32-foot by 36 foot shingle covered canopy would be added to the south side of the proposed addition It would be used as a drop off site The addition and canopy colors and materials will match the existing budding The variance is to the parking ordinance The ordinance states that for restaurants one parking space is required for every 120 square feet of floor area The floor area of the restaurant is 4,392 square feet, requiring 37 parking spaces 9 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 The depot has 75 existing visitor spaces and 20 leased employee spaces for the train and museum The sign will remain the same, the difference is that "Stillwater Grill" will be added to it Stillwater Grill will be red with a white background Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the special use permit for a 125 seat restaurant with a variance for parking located at 601 North Main Street with the following conditions 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed approved by the Community Development Director 2 No additional signage Motion passed unanimously Case No SUPN/03-24 Modification to a Bed and Breakfast Special Use Permit for construction of a two level, two stall addition (700 square feet) to an existing garage (1,020 square feet) with relocation of guest room from residence to garage and variance to rear yard setback for garage (25 feet required, 2 feet proposed) at the Aurora Staples Inn Bed and Breakfast, 303 North Fourth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Cathy and Jerry Helmberg, applicants Mr and Mrs Helmberg requested a modification to a Bed and Breakfast special use permit for the relocation of a guest room from the residence to the carriage house The Gallery (existing small guest room) in the main structure would be turned into a common room with a TV, games and a telephone for the guest The variance is to the side yard setback for the construction of a two -car garage (25 feet required, 2 feet requested) at the Aurora Staples Inn Bed and Breakfast and a variance to the permitted square footage of a second structure (1,000 square feet permitted, 1,232 square feet requested) Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the modification to the Bed and Breakfast special use permit to relocated one guest room to the carnage house located at 303 North Fourth Street with the following conditions 1 No more than five rooms shall be used as guest rooms 2 The budding official shall review and approve the guest room above the garage Motion passed unanimously 10 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Teske to approve the variance to the side yard setback for the construction of a two -car garage located at 303 North Fourth Street with the following condition 1 The building shall not be located within two feet of the east property line Motion passed unanimously Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Commissioner Ranum to deny the variance to the square footage requirements for the construction of a two -car garage 4 fore, 4 against Motion fails Case No SUP/03-25 A special use permit for relocation of the existing Trolley Ticket Office from Freight House parking lot to railroad right of way located at 400 Nelson Street in the CBD, Central Business District Bob Raleigh, applicant Mr Raleigh requested a special use permit to move the portable trolley ticket booth for the Stillwater Trolley from the Freight House Property to 8 to 10 feet onto the railroad right-of-way No other changes are proposed The Trolley currently uses two public parking spaces on Nelson Street for the Trolley loading and parking A special use permit (SUP/89-26) was previously issued for the use Todd Weiss, of the Stillwater Grill was concerned because they also lease land in the same area Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to approve the special use permit for the relocation of the existing Trolley Ticket Office from Freight House parking lot to railroad right of way located at 400 Nelson Street with the following conditions 1 The Trolley is limited to two permanent trolleys at the site at one time 2 A permit shall be obtained from the City Council for the use of the two parking spaces on Nelson Street for business parking Trolleys may park in the pay lot for no more than 20 minutes at a time 3 A parking permit can be obtained from the City for parking a Trolley in the permit lot off of Fourth Street 4 The ticket booth sign shall be a maximum of 8 square feet 5 The ticket booth shall be a maximum of 4' x 12' 6 The Special Use Permit shall be reviewed on a complaint basis Motion passed unanimously 11 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2003 Case No SUPN/03-26 A special use permit for a mini storage facility with a variance to the street setbacks (40 feet required, 15 feet and 24 feet proposed) located in the Business Park Industrial District, BP -I on the southeast corner of Curve Crest Blvd and Industrial Blvd Steve Gaffney, applicant Applicant requested a continuance until the April 14, 2003 meeting OTHER ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to adjourn the meeting at 10 45 p m Motion passed unanimously 12 Rpr 07 03 11 04a p 1 To Sue Fitzgerald From Steve Gaffney Prairie Winds of Stillwater self storage Apnl 7, 2003 Re Withdrawal of current site plan Dear Sue, Please remove my site plan request for the referenced project from your current agenda A revised plan will be submitted for next months schedule Thank you, '..k Qe& Steve Gaffney 1 Memorandum To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date April 3, 2003 Subject Zoning Amendment Study ni The City Council initiated a zoning amendment review for the area around the intersection of Greeley and Orleans Street (see attached study area map) The attached maps show existing land use conditions, existing zoning and Comp Plan are attached As can be seen, the area is a mix of multifamily, duplex and single family The proposed zoning map shows a change in zoning from single family, RA, to duplex residential for a portion of the study area The Brick Pond Apartments is currently designated single family The amendment would change the Brick Pond Apartments to multifamily, RCM A portion of Lily Lake Park is currently zoning multifamily, RCM This action is presented as a public hearing for Planning Commission consideration PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Case No Zres3 Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No _Special/Conditional Use Permit Vanance Resubdivision Subdivision* FEES $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot X Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 X Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (0 e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay th application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Orleans Street Address of Project L b t 11 . Block 1. P a r c h l A Assessor's Parcel No P e n ri , ng Linson Addition (GEO Code) Zoning District Description of Project Vacant Land Request to re -zone from RA Single Family Residential to RB Two -Family Distric Reason for re -zoning is to conform to the current land usage around said Rirheret y state a foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in ali respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply wit the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Robert & Carol Greethurst Representative Mailing Address 1602 S Greeley St Mailing Address City - State - ZipS t i l l w a t e r, MN 55082 City - State - Zip (h) 651-439-8844 Telephone No (cell) 6 51- 216 - 6 4 5 Telephone No Signature Lot Size (dimensions) _ x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory ,e. y (Signature is required) Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheda'PLANAPP FRM April 12 2002 R_IW R2OW RI9W R_W R_IW R2AW Vicinity Map 0 134 Scale in Feet ...a • of14.am..asap▪ p.ydI .a; a.'am.. • aay w.wa.e.c ny .. rpm.tl.aa.y.rowa. - Waapl.na_0.ad Of. Pave. (® I co®) Poo.. an A9.W Nmi.11m mont ..a•y Ym .W....a Ii.h27 SW 1 Memo To Mayor and City Council From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date March 28, 2003 Subject Request by Mr Greethurst for Waiver of Fees for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment Background Attached is application for zomng and comprehensive plan amendments for Parcel "A" The request is to rezone the lot, Parcel A, to Duplex Residential The attached existing land use, zoning and comp plan maps show existing designations for the site and area It is suggested that if the City Council wants to proceed with the request, the Council initiate a rezoning study of the area that will include the Greethurst property as well as lots on Linson Circle (duplexes - zoning single family) and Bnck Pond Apartments - zoned single family It would appear from an initial review, that a comp plan amendment may not be necessary Because this is a study and not a rezoning of a particular site, it will take two - three months to complete the review Recommendation City Council initiate a rezoning study of Orleans/Greeley Area Attachments Greethurst application City Council Action on 4-1-03 Authorized zoning amendment +5-0 t. — al,- i 1tivu' - -- Ll ~ — ! 11 I . 1 • Kc Locat on Map 1 T I r a2IW R2OW 1119W Vanity Map 0 346 Scale in Feet Ta.a...q a amY.. .nm.anmaw�a nmu uw woe. vos wa.vacammxn a.w...oq w...ya1Cov.. imams a..y..cmuw Savor w Npm Can, SO . ". OM Rom OS I man .a.am Ilea m.s.ao a.a.ea o.aa.a,i .awa mw Mg. aw.a .o.a mm H )(1' 1-/h4 L - , I IDLY LAKE PARK v.. \ — ST] j7 ADD ✓ — ,—; oar L — H ` J ,J Y �O A • I— ✓ ` _ 2 / c- 1 Location Map s 1� T ',I 1 LILY I AKg BEACH AND RECREATION AREA T WEST ORLEANS STREET_ H —00 • s ANDER50 400 naTTECUO LIN R2OW RI9W R.I. BAT' R29W Vicinity Map 0 1 Scale in Feet S 346 106 412 4/7-)//7 /7 Tti wI,7�C., w vnrram coup �w Asw ro ncuu�uos SouW v.n�r�cauip sur.,aki Oft ? �r ✓ 4� \44 •5 i — Y ✓ 1 1 ULY LAKE PARK r O a — r 2 S�LW- ATER 1 2 1 Il _1 L Location Map ULY LAKE BEACH AND RECREATION AREA _ ✓ ULY LAKE PARK 30 e _ —14 1/010 401111004.01/ soar gyro ae n ]N nIN n 0N n9N B1IW HZOW ¢4nw Vicinity Map 9 346 Scale in Feet a on eu nw mndreproduteo s�o, axmnr tr.wow nous wen�gm [over n v a..no 0o u used wrnanro Won. only w a+ aai Cowry m Sa✓u W smdon Carty Sw1HOh Rm 151UU255 Pert* ace PoaonA� .am4, a1Ca95 ,3 AW a 4003 8 — ULY LAKE PARK 2 �LATz12 Y' _ Location Map LILY LAKE — le O E. 1 i e a i, ULY LAKE BEACH AND RECREATION AREA i ULY LAKE PARK I —14 201010. NV • WIMPY R2IW K2OW RI9W T3IN 730N 1121W RIIW R20W nz. TIIN Vicinity Map 0 346 Scale in Feet m orwang ,saw .mwwm su reproa.ce na mem Vey wow ',ton on . crown, shwa ovoe... om w 41 041 C•ms.ty wm. mwr Sous. w.r.wo^ cunt. Saw, -' RCM 165 (4304 so MU " n.,.,, 1� Moo Mod Llecil mm PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO PUD/03-27 Planning Commission Date April 14, 2003 Project Location 608 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Downtown Commercial Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Terra Springs LLC Type of Application Concept Planned Unit Development Project Description Concept Planned Unit Development review of Terra Springs project on 7 93 acre site including 227 housing units in five buildings, 4,000 square feet of office use, 9,000 square feet of retail and 2 64 acres public courtyard, open space, landscaping and interpretive trail Discussion As previously presented, the City of Stillwater has selected a developer and is working with that developer on plans for the infill/redevelopment of the old territorial prison site at 608 North Main Street The redevelopment site is the land inside wall that defines the perimeter of the site Lands above the wall will be retained by the city as part of its open space system As shown in the attached development plans the proposal is for five buildings, buildings 1-5 as described below Building Date Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 Building 4 Two stories of residential over one level of half paring/half commercial 19 two story townhouses @1,500 sq ft average Approximately 38 underground parking stalls (2/home) 7,000 sq ft commercial/historical interpretive Proposed approximate building height (floor one to roofline) 45 feet Four stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking 44 condominiums @1,320 gross sq ft average mix of one and two story homes approx 62 underground parking stalls (1 4/home) proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 60 feet eight stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking 90 condominiums @ 1,2S0 gross sq ft average approx, Approx 153 underground parking stalls (1 7/home) Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 95 feet Three stores of residential over one partially underground level of parking 32 rental apartments @ 1,350 gross sq ft average Approximately 58 underground parking stalls (1 8/home) Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 45 feet Building 5 Four stories of residential over one level of parking and retail 42 rental apartments or for -sale condominiums @1,200 sq ft average Approximately 67 underground parking stalls (1 6/home) 6,000 sq ft commercial Totals 227 homes 13,000 sq ft commercial 376 enclosed dedicated parking stalls 145 on -site guest parking spaces Two hundred and twenty seven housing units are proposed in the five buildings In addition, commercial space of 13,000 square feet, 4,000 office and 9,000 retail is proposed Parking requirements for the residential use is two spaces per unit or 454 spaces Commercial space requirements is 58 spaces Totaling 512 spaces The plans show a total of 487 spaces, 342 covered and 145 surface Public access to the green and trial system will also require parking as well as pedestrian access The proposed height of the buildings is not clear The application indicates a maximum height of six stories and 65 feet The height limit for the CBD district is 50 feet The PUD would be developed in phases starting with 2003 and completing in 2005 The development plans include drainage and circulation have been reviewed by the city engineer, traffic consultant and fire chief The circulation plan will be modified to address fire concerns for building access The concept design plans were reviewed by the HPC at their meeting of April 7, 2003 They approved the building concepts proposed The detailed building design will require design approval before a design permit is issued Likewise, final PUD approval will require special building use description, composition of residential units and assigned parking The parking ordinance allows for modifications to the parking standards based on a specific site and use analysis The height of the proposed building(s) may require a height variance This will be reviewed when specific building design plans are proposed for building permits As a part of the proposal, an interpretive trail/facility plan is proposed The specifics of this plan/facility should be coordinated with the parks board/heritage preservation commission and Washington County Historical Commission Environmental Review A environmental review assessment worksheet , EAW, is required because the site is on the National Register of Historical Places The EAW is attached and will be notified for review and comment Recommendation / Attachments Application and plans V Telephone No 651-291 ;•591 Signature i PLANNING ADMINIS I utATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No 111.) Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED _Special/Conditional Use Permit — Variance _ Resubdivision — Subdivision* FEES $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot — Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _ Zoning Amendment* $300 X Planning Unit Development* $500 _ Certificate of Compliance $ 70 * An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineenng fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (0 e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 700 No Main (Terntonal Prison site) Assessor's Parcel No (GEO Code) Zoning District Description of Project "7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " ** Presently the property is owned by the city After the sale, property will be owned by Terra Springs LLC ** Property Owner TERRA SPRINGS LLC Representative BRIAN SWEENEY Mailing Address 180 East 5th St — Ste 160 Mailing Address (same) City - State — Zip St Paul. MN 55101 City - State — Zip (same) Telephone No 651-29 -3591 N-11., Signature (• igna ' r=(required) (Signatur required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area approx. 6 Acres Height of Buildings Stories Feet Pnncipal 2-6 stones 20-58 feet Acccssory ( total of 5 buildings) Total Building floor area square feet Existing 8.000 square feet Proposed 250,000 square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces — 342 H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM April 12 2002 Memo To Mayor and City Council° From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date Apnl 11, 2003 Subject review and Approval of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Notification of 30 Day Review The Temtonal Pnson is on the National Register of Histoncal Places The Terra Spnngs project will effect the histonc and archeological resources of the site As EAW is required to descnbe the impacts and to consider possible mitigation for the impacts The EAW process requires that the EAW is sent to review agencies and notice of review to the local paper With this approval, the EAW will be distributed as required Comments and responses to comments will be returned to the Council for final action with the project plans review in May Recommendation Approval of EAW for notification and distnbution Attachment Terra Spnngs EAW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to preparers This form is available at www mnplan state mn us EAW Guidelines will be available in Spring 1999 at the web site The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determme whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for — but should not complete — the final worksheet If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EAW is prepared electronically Note to reviewers Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of mformation, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS 1 Project title 2 Proposer Contact person Title Address City, state ZIP Phone Fax E mail 4 Reason for EAW EIS scoping If EAW or EIS is 5 Project location N'/2oftheNE Frauenshuh Sweeney Brian Sweeney President 180 East 5th Street - # 160 St Paul, MN 55101 651 291 3591 651 223-5652 BrianAfsweeney com preparation (check one) X Mandatory EAW Citizen petition 3 RGU City of Stillwater Contact person Steve Russell Title Community Development Director Address 216 N 4th Street City state ZIP Stillwater MN 55082 Phone 651-430-8821 Fax 651-430-8810 E-mail srussell@ci stillwater mn us RGU discretion Proposer volunteered mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number 31, and subpart name Historical Places County Washington City/Township City of Stillwater ''A Section 28 Township 30N Range 20W Attach each of the following to the EAW • County map showing the general location of the project Map 1 attached • U S Geological Survey 7 5 minute, 1 24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable) Map 2 attached • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features Map 3 attached 6 Description a Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor The proposed development of the 7 93 acre site is a mixed -use infill development The site as located on the north end of Stillwater's Main Street where the Territorial Prison once stood A fire last September destroyed the last remaining prison buildings The proposal is for 227 residential units housed in five (5) buildings of heights of 25, 40, 50 and possibly 90 feet A perimeter interpretive trail and large green courtyard is proposed as part of site design Planning applications required for project approval include Subdivision, Planned Unit Development Permit, Design Permit and possible variance (building height) b Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction Attach additional sheets as necessary Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities Existing structures will remain on stie, the new construction of five (5) new housing buildings will not cause significant manipulation of the environment or produce any hazardous waste The project consists of five (5) new multi -family housing buildings with approximately 13,000 square feet of retail space and with related site improvements See site plan, Map 3 and below for more specific building and project MJJJO 25 PT f I ih I. \ a_�'p� iii ��\. r-»ir1i��rii s PrAfil"�TeW -111-101/Illibiliti \-\ e � •I � � F i-��l a rangiteV,91,11114; ILII4 V \ 1% mg 7 \ „. (Houltonl 27 (a) Prinapal Arterials 51fe- N 4.9, 51 DOWNTOWN STILLWATER NORTH MAIN HOUSING INFILL • -, - - LOCATION MAP I `ry1�5 gWC Fj1`-, aim t � Y F � J BHfLIXELL ARCE LU E,LTD► 129 NORTH %"DV O 1REEr $101 MINNFARrIJS mrw.-Esor,5 401 lot 213 43771 r V(1e12008C04O URBAN PLANNING OPEN 1ACECOMMLINITIES ARO-ITECTURF LANVDCATE ARCHTTECiURF GRAPHIC I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH PLAN SPELIFILATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT AIPERVbION AND THAT I AM A DIILY REGISTERED ARLHITECr UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REC NO rom0 +.Rr. n u u.m1 uu. it 0 50 100 SCALE 1"=1OO' (m / -p3 BE !SIGNS PRELIMINARY SITE CONCEPT DATE 11.t22.002 PROJECT NO' 01 2$40 11111 DESIGN .uls,t.la. DRAWN ILLS. OF c Explain the project purpose, if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries Develop a medium density mixed -use development that will reuse a tremendously underutilized parcel of city -owned land in downtown Stillwater, Minnesota It will not only add to the economic vitality of Stillwater, but also will preserve and document the tremendous cultural, archeological and natural elements of this site In addition to the housing, retail and office Elements there will be an interpretive center and interpretive trails preserving and showcasing the limestone walls as well as the runs on the site d Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen9 _Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project timeline and plans for environmental review e Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project'? _Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development timeline and any past environmental review 7 Project magnitude data Total project acreage 7 93 acres Number of residential units unattached -0 attached 227 maximum units per building 90 Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space) total square feet Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet) Office 4,000 Manufacturing Retail 9,000 Other industrial Warehouse Institutional Light industrial Agricultural Other commercial (specify) Building height If over 2 stories compare to heights of nearby buildings Different building heights 25 feet, 40 feet, 50 feet and 90 feet (Highest building downtown 60-70 feet) 8 Permits and approvals required List all known local state and federal permits approvals and financial assistance for the project Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure Unit of government Type of application Status City of Stillwater Subdivision, Planned Unit Dev, In progress Possible Variance (Height) Design Permit, Access Permit 9 Land use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelmes The site was originally a Territorial Prison Over the years most of the prison buildings have been removed In September 2002 a tragic fire destroyed the last major building on the site A portion of a storage building remains and will be incorporated into the proposed site design The City's Comprehensive Downtown Plan and Downtown Plan call for adoptive reuse of the site and building City housing policy call for infill development, development where urban services are available The proposed use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning 10 Cover types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development Before After Before After Types 1 8 wetlands 0 0 Lawn/landscaping 2 64 acres Wooded/forest 0 0 Impervious surfaces 3 72 acres Brush/Grassland 0 0 Other (describe) 1 57 acres Cropland 0 0 TOTAL 7 93 acres If Before and After totals are not equal explain why EXISTING CONDITIONS Impervious — 4 08 acres Pervious - 3 85 acres TOTAL 7 93 acres 11 Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts None known b Are any state -listed (endangered threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site9 _Yes X No If yes describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts 12 Physical impacts on water resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration — dredging filling stream diversion outfall structure, diking, and impoundment — of any surface waters such as a lake pond wetland stream or drainage ditch9 _Yes X No If yes identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts 13 Water use Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)9 _Yes X No If yes as applicable give location and purpose of any new wells public supply affected, changes to be made and water quantities to be used, the source duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations, and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers if known Identify any existing and new wells on the site map If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine 14 Water -related land use management district Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district a delineated 100-year flood plain or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use districts _Yes X No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions 15 Water surface use Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body'? _Yes X No If yes indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses 16 Erosion and sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved acres 7 93 cubic yards 78,000 Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction Flat site that will balance with the placement of the buildings and site improvements Typical silt fencing and water control measures will be used 17 Water quality surface water runoff a Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans The developed site will improve water quality and decrease the quantity of storm water runoff from the site Approximately one-half of the existing site is surfaced with gravel or bituminous There is no rate control or water quality treatment facilities presently on site Runoff flows primarily from west to east toward Main Street, and into the city storm sewer system, which outlets to the St Croix River A comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan has been designed for the site We plan on minimizing pollution and runoff by providing on -site storm water detention facilities and storm water treatment trains Due to the site constraints, the proposed plan indicates utilizing natural measures for treatment, including ram gardens and grass swales Other site storm water treatment practices indicated by the proposed plan are by permeable paving stone, sump catch basins, underground water quality treatment structures and an underground sand filter dram field A Maintenance Program for the developed site will include a recommended schedule for cleaning and inspection of the storm water quality treatment facilities The Site Storm Water Management Plan anticipates meeting or exceeding guidelines set by the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program with these practices in place The quantity of runoff from the site will be significantly decreased due to site improvements Runoff reduction percentages are as follows 1-year/24-hour storm - 90% decrease, 10-year/24-hour storm - 50% decrease, 100-year/24-hour storm, 25% decrease b Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters Storm water runoff on site will be conveyed by pipe to the St Croix River With regular ongoing maintenance of on -site storm water treatment facilities, the proposed stormwater managment plans anticipates a 90% or greater Total Suspended Solids removal and a 70% or greater Total Phosphorus removal from storm water effluent Considering these removal efficiencies, the impact of stormwater effluent from the site will have very negligible impact on the river 18 Water gtrahty wastewaters a Describe sources composition and quantities of all sanitary municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site Residential waste water will be discharged into municipal system b Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment Identify receiving waters including major downstream water bodies and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters If the project involves on site sewage systems discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems Runoff rates maintained at or below current levels c If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes identifying any improvements necessary Oak Park Heights Meto Waste facility, adequate capacity per Comprehensive Plan, normal residential waste d If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure Identify any improvements necessary Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems None 19 Geologic hazards and soil conditions a Approximate depth (m feet) to ground water minimum average to bedrock minimum average Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map sinkholes shallow limestone formations or karst conditions Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards (Attached response Exhibit "A") b Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications if known Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination (Attached response Exhibit "A") 20 Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a Describe types amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation Identify method and location of disposal For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan describe how the project will be modified for recycling If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments Project will generate no hazardous wast Construction waste will be separated and recycled (cardboard, clean wood, glass, plastic) b Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission The construction project will not use hazardours or toxic materials in any quantity that will contaminate the groundwater supply c Indicate the number, location size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials except water Describe any emergency response containment plans None to our knowledge Site has MPCA, No Association and No Action Letters 21 Traffic Parking spaces added 350 Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) 200 Estimated total average daily traffic generated 1700 Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence 100 a m / 110 p m Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area discuss its impact on the regional transportation system (Attached response Exhibit "B") 22 Vehicle -related air emissions Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality including carbon monoxide levels Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts Note If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EAW Gurdelrnes about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed Recent use of the site was a bus repair storage yard for school bus fleet parking lot Additional new spaces added estimated at 305 The site is downtown mfill site with trail/sidewalk access to community and recreation services reducing need for automobiles 23 Stationary source air emissions Describe the type, sources quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guedelrnes for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone -depleting chemicals (chloro fluorocarbons hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride) Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices Describe the impacts on air quality None proposed 24 Odors, noise and dust Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation9 _Yes X No Construction will cause a normal amount of noise and dust City regulates control levels If yes, describe sources characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life (Note fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here ) 25 Nearby resources Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site'? A Archaeological historical or architectural resources9 X Yes _No (Attached response Exhibit «CI) B Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve9 _Yes X No C Designated parks, recreation areas or trails9 X Yes _No D Scenic views and vistas9 _Yes X No E Other unique resources'? _Yes X No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project -related impacts on the resource Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts A Archaeological, historical resource (see Exhibit "C") B Designated parks, recreation areas, and trails An interpretive trail plan has been approved by the City for the site The development includes a perimeter trail around the prison wall Park space is provided in the courtyard/green area 26 Visual impacts Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks9 _Yes X No Site is set below surrounding bluffs If yes, explain 27 Compatibility with plans and land use regulations Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan land use plan or regulation or other applicable land use water, or resource management plan of a local regional, state or federal agency9 X Yes _No If yes, descnbe the plan discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved If no, explain 28 Impact on infrastructure and public services Will new or expanded utilities roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project9 _Yes X No If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed (Note any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW, see EAW Guidelines for details ) Existing City utilities and roads service the site 29 Cumulative impacts Minnesota Rule part 4410 1700, subpart 7 item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects' when determining the need for an environmental impact statement Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form) This is a stand alone project, no additional development impacts are anticipated 30 Other potential environmental impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28 identify and discuss them here along with any proposed mitigation None known 31 Summary of issues Do not complete this section if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping instead address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document which must accompany the EAW List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions No impacts have been identified that would require mitigation beyond what has been described in the EAW Because of the fire on September 6, 2002, the site lost the key to the site's listing on the National Historical Register Therefore, the remaining elements of significant value include the Historic Prison wall, the archeological amenities, and remnant foundation of the buildings destroyed by fire Since the prison wall will be improved and repaired consistent with historical standards, it will not be moved or destroyed The wall will remain, rehabilitated for the viewing by pedestrian on a trail that will be constructed around the perimeter of the wall base The archeological elements have been identified and preserved in all feasible ways by preventing building on the most important sites within the development The remains and remnants of the buildings destroyed by fire will be included in a part that will allow viewing of the ruins in a controlled setting The project will improve public opportunities for viewing important elements by not only stabilizing the elements from further deterioration and neglect, but by creating public viewing opportunities in a safe and controlled manner None of these opportunities now exist for the public on this site Therefore, there are no known impacts requiring additional mitigation RGU CERTIFICATION The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor I hereby certify that • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge • The EAW describes the complete project there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions as defined at Minnesota Rules parts 4410 0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list Signature Date Title Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning For additional mformation, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St , St Paul, MN 55155 651 296 8253, or www mnplan state mn us 04/10/2003 18 16 FAX 8905883 INSTANT TESTING/ALLIED (a1002 6en/6,frk/94 ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY 7125 West 126th Street, Suite 500 • Savage, Minnesota 55378-1103 Telephone 952 890-5809 Fax 952 890-5883 Geotechn,cal Services • Commercial, Residential and Mvn ipal April 10, 2003 Mr Steve Russell City of Stillwater 216 North Forth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Subject EAW Question 19 Territorial Place Allied Project Number 03024 Dear Mr Russell, Here are appropriate responses for Question 19 19 Geologic Hazards and soil conditions Part a Approximate depth (in feet) to around water Minimum 2 2 feet Median used as average 4 7 feet Approximate depth (in feet) to bedrock Minimum 2 feet (below fill at western end of site) Median used as average 7 feet, with a range of 2 feet to greater than 26 5 feet Geologic hazards to ground water In the southeastern part of the site, a valley cut into bedrock and naturally filled with alluvial sands is geologically sensitive and might represent a hazard similar to a sinkhole Map is attached Measures to avoid of minimize problems due to this hazard Natural (existing) layering in the subsurface creates a high vertical impedance to downward flow of hazards This barrier might be enhanced by placing on -site clayey soils over the excavation base prior to the placement of fill to make grade or to act as a tile drain 04/10/2003 18 18 FAX 8905883 INSTANT TESTING/4LLIED tI003 EAW Question 19 Territorial Place Allied Project Number 03024 April 10 2003 Page2 Part b Describe the soils on the site, giving NRSC (SCS) classification. If known. 858C Urban land - Chetek 1039 Urban land Descnbe soil aranulanty and potential for groundwater contamination The urban soils are composed of granular fill soils, which cover the entire site The only area that underlies these soils and intervening mostly granular alluvial fill, which has a significant potential for groundwater contamination, is identified in part a of this question There is little if any potential for future groundwater contamination from the expected future use of this site In addition, the high vertical anisotropy of the soils could hinder vertical movement of any contamination Mitigation methods to prevent such contamination See paragraph in part a of this section Please call us with any questions concerning this material Our opinions were arrived at in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices currently in use at this time ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY I hereby certify that I am a duly Registered Professional Geologist under the laws of the State of Minnesota Michael E Schoenberg, P G , P Hg Professional Geologist, Minnesota Registration Number 41418 Project Engineer CC Ron Spoden, J Buxell, Fax 612-338-2818 +8.7 SO Boring 674341 Monitoring 1h911 c 1 . 8W.4 Surface Mar Station o I I1 Allied Test Dnllung Company 7025 West 126th Street Savage, MN 55378 1 Y� 7DS 7 1 4 C3 O 011 O Extent of Buuned Valley P��t e4 Temtorial Place by MEs Stdtwater, Nlnnesota 80 7s Base prowled by J BuxeU AQchttecture •91 04/02/2003 15 53 FAX Z1002/003 ti, h, f-1/3" AIPSal 3595 Vadnais Center Drive SL Pail MN 55110 5196 651 490 2000 651 490 2150 FAX architecture Engineering EnDi?Onmvata1 LranspOrtatron Apnl 2, 2003 Mr Steve Russell Community Development Director City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082-4807 Dear Steve RE Stillwater, Minnesota Temtonal Place Traffic Study SEH No A-STILL0101 00 14 00 We have reviewed the site plan for Terntonal Place on North Main Street as requested We previously met with your staff and the developer relative to a number of traffic concerns which we had with street dimensions, parking dimensions, and general circulation patterns We have not wntten a follow-up report nor have we seen any revisions since our meeting in February We have completed a traffic impact study of the development The 229 dwelling units within the development will generate approximately 1,700 vehicle tnps per day The commercial development will also generate trips, but we believe that most will be tnps by pedestrians who have left their vehicles m other parking areas of the City Some of the commercial traffic will also come from the development residents We believe that the maximum vehicle traffic developed in the site from the commercial areas will be 150 tnps per day In the AM Peak Period, we anticipate that the development will generate approximately 100 outbound trips onto North Main Street This is a rate of slightly less than two vehicles per minute This should be absorbed into Main Street without any traffic problem The major additional impact will be at the intersection of Main Street and Chestnut Street in the downtown area We do not believe this will add any noticeable delay to traffic in the intersection In the PM Peak Penod, we anticipate there will be approximately 110 vehicles entenng the complex and 40 vehicles exiting from it The exiting traffic, at less than one per minute, will not be noticeable anywhere along Main Street The vehicles approaching the site will create a noticeable left turn movement The volume of traffic southbound on Main Street at this time is not heavy and the northbound left turns should not create more than momentary delays We anticipate that approximately 100 of the 110 vehicles will make northbound left turns with the remaining 10 southbound nght turns The northbound traffic will come from eastbound Myrtle Street, or from northbound Main Street south of Myrtle Street We anticipate that there will be approximately one vehicle per minute added to northbound Main Street at Chestnut Street This again will not be noticeable in the PM Peak Penod which is already delayed We believe that some residents will use County Road 15 and County Road 12 to approach the area on Myrtle Street as an alternative route Short Elliott Hendnckson Inc LOCATION Your Trusted Resource Equal Opportunity Employer RX TIME 04/02 '03 16 30 04/02/2003 15 53 FAX J 003/003 Mr Steve Russell Apnl 2, 2003 Page 2 The development will also generate approximately 1,000 vehicle tnps on a Saturday With the much heavier volumes on North Main Street on Saturday, this volume will be more noticeable but will not add substantially to any delays anywhere along the street Traffic will be spread out throughout the day as opposed to weekday peak penod concentrations We therefore believe that the additional development will not create any noticeable traffic impacts on Main Street with the exception of northbound left turns in the PM Peak Penod at the entrance If you need any additional information or specific calculations for reports, please contact us and we will supply them If you have questions, please call us Sincerely, SHORT F T :EOTT HENDRICKS ON INC Glen Van Wormer, PE Senior Transportation Engineer sah WpCilp1U6pL\005411‘0101Mocone•poodmm4veaon040203 doc LOCATION RX TIME 04/02 '03 16 30 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED TERRASPRINGS DEVELOPMENT AT THE MINNESOTA TERRITORIAL/STATE PRISON (21WA96), STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA SHPO File Number 2002-3282 Prepared by The 106 Group Ltd for the City of Stillwater April 2003 I INTRODUCTION The City of Stillwater has requested an assessment of the potential effects of the proposed TerraSpnngs development on all histonc, archaeological and cultural resources within the development's area of potential effect (APE) in partial fulfillment of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) The purpose of this study is to determine the presence or absence of listed National Register of Historic Places (National Register) properties that might be affected by the undertaking Minnesota Histonc Sites Act (M S 138 661 — 138 6691) created a state register of hstonc sites Histonc sites are defined as properties named in the Act or listed on the National Register The Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Site was listed on the National Register in 1982 SHPO believes that the surviving components of the site include the walls, the building ruins, the archaeological resources, and the Indian Battle Ground marker and wayside rest Currently the proposed development property consists of vacant land surrounded by the onginal stone walls of the Temtonal/State Pnson All but two of the pnson buildings were dismantled between 1936 and 1939 and an arson fire reduced the two remaining structures to ruins in September of 2002 The effects of this fire severely affected the site, and at the time the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) indicated that the site might be de -listed from the National Register However, in a letter dated March 27, 2003, Dennis Gimmestad, the SHPO Government Programs and Compliance Officer, stated that the Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson "property continues to meet National Register of Historic Places (National Register) cntena The applicable cntena are Cntenon D (archaeological significance), and possibly A (for lustonc associations)" (D Gimmestad to S Russell, March 27, 2003, on file at the SHPO) II PROJECT DESCRIPTION The TerraSpnngs development consists of 227 dwelling units located within five buildings An additional 13,000 square feet of office/commercial space (including an interpretive center) is planned The structures include one 3-story building (#1), one 3 %- Minnesota TemtonaUState Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 2 story building (#4), one 4 'A -story building (#2), one 5-story building (#5), and one 8 '/A story building (#3) The massing of the proposed structures is based on the onginal pnson plan with the exception of a central green space/rum feature and Building 3 at the west end of the former pnson yard Partial or completely underground parking is planned for each structure Construction is limited to the 7 93-acre area within the lower prison walls HL METHODS BACKGROUND RESEARCH METHODS On Apnl 2, 2003, background research was conducted at the Minnesota State Histonc Preservation Office (SHPO) for information on previously identified National Register properties within one mile (1 6 lulometer [km]) of the project area The Wisconsin National Register database was also reviewed on Apnl 2, 2003 for resources on the east side of the St Croix River ARCHAEOLOGY AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT The APE for archaeology is the same as the project area and includes all areas where construction or other ground -disturbing activities related to the project might take place Based on construction plans available in Apnl of 2003, the entire area within the lower walls of the histonc pnson will be impacted by development activities ARCHAEOLOGY FIELD METHODS In order to assess effects to known or suspected archaeological resources within the project area, the proposed construction plan for the TerraSpnngs development was electronically supenmposed on a composite map of structure locations that have been identified through histoncal or archaeological documentation (Figures 1 and 2) ARCHITECTURE -HISTORY AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT The analysis of the architecture -history APE for the project is based on the following factors in conjunction with the descnption of the project undertaking and on preliminary traffic analysis • land acquisition, • changes in access to properties, • alteration in traffic patterns, • noticeable traffic volume increase, • perceptible increase in noise, • visual effects from changes in grade, • increase in vibration, • change in air quality, and Mmnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 3 • change in land use and a property's setting Analysis of APE Factors Land Acqutsitton The TerraSpnngs development project is limited to an approximately 7 93-acre parcel of land located on North Main Street in Stillwater The parcel corresponds to the histonc pnson grounds located within a natural hollow that is bound on the north, west, and south by steep, high bluffs These bluffs and the surviving histonc walls of the pnson mark the north and south boundaries of the property, while the west boundary extends to North Second Street and the eastern boundary is marked by Main Street Development is planned within the open land bounded by the innermost walls of the former pnson No additional land acquisition for this project is anticipated Change al Access to Properties Histoncally, the main access to the Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson property was through a gate off of Stillwater's Main Street This entrance corresponds to the current southerly access into the property A second entrance, through which railcars entered the pnson property, was located at the northeast corner of the pnson yard This access corresponds to the current northern entrance into the property that provides access to the histonc wayside marker The proposed access route to the TerraSpnngs development is a central entrance located to the north of the onginal main pnson entrance This access route forks into two separate roads that funnel traffic to the north and south of the former twine and shoe shop locations along roadways that existed within the histonc pnson Access to surrounding properties will not be altered during the development of the TerraSpnngs project Alterations in Traffic Patterns While the existing traffic patterns along Stillwater's Main Street will remain largely unchanged, the new entrance to the TerraSpnngs development is located immediately opposite the entrance to the Stillwater Depot Logging and Railroad Museum, which is home to the Minnesota Zephyr excursion train The train runs daily at 11 30 AM and 6 30 PM (5 30 on Sunday) The development of the TerraSpnngs entrance will create a new intersection along this portion of Main Street A traffic impact study for the development completed by Short Elliott Hendnckson Inc (SEH), notes that during the PM Peak Period there will be "a noticeable left turn movement" at this intersection, but this traffic "should not create more than momentary delays" (G VanWormer to S Russell, Apnl 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater) Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 4 Noticeable Traffic Volume and Norse Increases Along the Main Street comdor, increases in traffic (average volumes as well as increases in bus traffic and/or speed) will determine noise impacts to adjacent residences In general, if sound energy is doubled (i e , the amount of traffic doubles), there is a 3- decibel increase in noise, which is just barely noticeable to most people A 20 percent increase in traffic noise can result in an increase in noise of one decibel, which would be imperceptible to most people Up until two years ago the pnson site was use as a bus storage facility that generated a lot of bus traffic and associated noise It is estimated that the development will generate approximately 1,700 vehicle tnps per day associated with the residential portion of the development and 150 tnps per day from the commercial portion (G VanWormer to S Russell, Apnl 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater) It is not known what percentage this number of vehicle traps would increase the overall traffic volume on Main Street It is noted, though, that the vehicular traffic associated with the site dunng the AM and PM Peak Penods "should be absorbed into Main Street without any traffic problem" and "will not be noticeable anywhere along Main Street" (G VanWormer to S Russell, Apnl 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater) Based on these results, it is anticipated that traffic volumes would increase by less than 50 percent Noise levels are therefore not likely to increase by 3 decibels The APE for the project could conservatively include the first row of properties closest to development in order to account for any possible impact from increased traffic volume and noise on those properties Visual Effects The proposed TerraSpnngs development consists of one 3-story building (#1), one 3 '/2- story building (#4), one 4 '/2-story building (#2), one 5-story building (#5), and one 8 ''A story building (#3) These buildings vary in height from 45 ft to 95 ft with the tallest building located at the west end of the property The main cellblock buildings and associated shops of the histonc pnson were predominately three-story buildings with four-story tower accents, while the other buildings within the pnson grounds were one - and two-story structures A site visit to the project area revealed that, because the development property is located within a natural hollow that is presently well -screened by trees to the south and west, visual impacts are limited to those properties immediately adjacent to the project area to the north or south, or those that could view the proposed development through the open east end of the hollow Increase in Vibration The TerraSpnngs development project will not result in a perceptible increase in ground vibration except dunng the construction phase Minnesota TemtonaUState Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 5 Change in Air Quality Change in air quality is not expected to exceed state standards and, therefore, is not a contnbuting factor in determining the APE Impacts to Land Use and a Property s Setting Currently the proposed development property consists of vacant land surrounded by the onginal stone walls of the Temtonal/State Pnson All but two of the original pnson buildings were dismantled between 1936 and 1939 An arson fire reduced the remaining two structures to ruins in September of 2002 A wayside rest and histoncal marker constructed in 1939/40 are located in the northeast portion of the property The proposed land use is pnmanly residential with some office/commercial and will impact the same proportion of the property as the histonc pnson Most of the proposed development structures share footpnnts with onginal pnson buildings and are of a similar scale, thereby maintaining the structural density of the pnson The only exception to this general development plan is a central green space/ruin feature and Building 3 at the west end of the former pnson yard APE Summary Based on the above -mentioned factors, the architecture -history APE for the Ten-aSpnngs project is generally defined as all of the first tier or adjacent properties that may be impacted by visual and noise effects The boundanes for the APE were expanded in areas where properties may be affected by changes in access, visual effects, and/or additional increased levels of noise Because the development property is located within a natural hollow that is presently well -screened by trees to the south and west, visual impacts are limited to those properties immediately adjacent to the project area to the north or south, and those that are in view of the proposed development through the open east end of the hollow The resulting study area for architecture -history contains three National Register listed properties the Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson, the Minnesota Temtonal Pnson Warden's House, and the Stillwater Bndge IV PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ARCHAEOLOGY In June of 2002, The 106 Group prepared an archaeological resources overview for the Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson property (Terrell 2002a) Extensive site -specific archival research using histoncal photographs, maps, and additional pnmary materials was completed for, and is summanzed in, this report Particular attention was given to evidence for the location and design of the original temtonal pnson buildings that were torn down in 1871 Based on the results of this study, The 106 Group recommended a Phase II archaeological evaluation of the prison should occur because of the high Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 6 potential for the area to contain intact archaeological deposits that could answer important research questions per National Register Cntenon D and the potential to uncover deposits eligible under Cntenon A Dr Scott Anfinson, SHPO National Register Archaeologist, concurred with these results dunng a meeting on July 10, 2002 Dunng August and September of 2002, The 106 Group conducted a Phase II archaeological evaluation of the Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson (Terrell 2002b) The archaeological evaluation of the site demonstrated that the entire project area contains intact archaeological resources including those that date back to the earliest temtonal penod In particular, the intenor and exterior foundations of all of the major structures on the property documented on the 1884 and later Sanborn fire insurance maps survive In addition, the excavation revealed a portion of the onginal 1853 stone wall that surrounded the temtonal pnson and a foundation possibly associated with a pre-1877 dwelling that was located to the west of the onginal pnson The 106 Group recommended that these foundations are eligible for the National Register under Cntenon A for their association with the development of the Minnesota Terntonal/State Pnson system and are therefore contnbuting elements to the National Register -listed site The survival of these foundations and their associated features, such as curbing and sidewalks, indicates that archaeological features, such as pnvies, wells, and trash pits, while not encountered dunng this survey, may also survive on the site Such resources would be considered eligible for the National Register under Cntenon D for their potential to answer significant research questions about the pnson In a letter dated March 27, 2003, Dennis Gimmestad, the SHPO Government Programs and Compliance Officer, stated that the Minnesota Temtorial/State Pnson "property continues to meet National Register of Histonc Places (National Register) cntena The applicable cntena are Cntenon D (archaeological significance), and possibly A (for histonc associations)" (D Gimmestad to S Russell, March 27, 2003, on file at the SHPO) ARCHITECTURE -HISTORY The City of Stillwater has numerous National Register properties, including the Stillwater Commercial Histonc Distnct Three listed National Register properties are located within the architecture -history APE the Minnesota Temtonal/State Prison, the Minnesota Temtonal Pnson Warden's House, and the Stillwater Bndge V SUMMARY OF EFFECTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES MINNESOTA TERRITORIAL/STATE PRISON Property Description The Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson is significant as the site of the onginal temtonal pnson (1853-1858) and subsequent state pnson (1859-1914) The "pnson site, walls, and remaining buildings" were listed on the National Register in 1982 At the time of the Mmnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 7 nomination, the former shoe factory, rebuilt after an 1884 fire, and an associated leather and twine storage facility, built c 1895, were still standing The other pnson buildings had been dismantled between 1936 and 1939 In September of 2002, an arson fire reduced the two remaining structures to ruins The upper and lower limestone block walls surrounding the property were constructed by convict labor between 1871 and 1892 The pnson walls and the ruins of the former shoe shop and the leather and twine storage building are the only above -ground resources remaining at the site from the pnson penod The archaeological evaluation of the site in 2002 demonstrated that the entire pnson yard contains intact archaeological resources including those that date back to the earliest temtonal period (Terrell 2002b) The foundations of many of the former structures are also visible on the ground surface Despite the fire in the fall of 2002, the site continues to meet National Register cntena Description of Effects Minnesota-Territorial/State Prison Historic Properly As a result of the TerraSpnngs development there is an overall adverse effect to the historical associations and nature of the property (National Register Cntenon A) The loss of this integnty as a result of the development, may lead to the removal of the site from the National Register Archaeology The planned TerraSpnngs development, associated grading, and utility work will impact the entire historic pnson yard and will therefore destroy archaeological deposits throughout the property that were demonstrated in the Phase II archaeological evaluation to include intact foundations and features dating back to the temtonal penod (Figures 1 and 2) Walls The current development plan calls for the City of Stillwater to retain ownership of the pnson walls The City plans to rehabilitate the walls through cleaning and tuck -pointing An approximately 100-ft long section of the wall located in the northwest corner of the property has failed This section will be rebuilt in front of the onginal location and a cnb and drainage system will be installed behind the new wall section Salvaged stone will be used to create a new wall that will, as near as possible, match the onginal wall in appearance Dunng construction the walls will be exposed to vibrations from equipment and construction activities Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 8 Ruins Portions of the walls of the former shoe shop and the leather and twine storage building survived the fire The TerraSpnngs development will incorporate the walls of the leather and twine storage building into the facade of Building 4, and utilize the remains of the former shoe shop as a landscape feature Proposed Mitigation Measures Minnesota Territorial/State Prison Historic Property As a result of the TerraSpnngs development, much of the histoncal associations of the pnson property will be lost and the site may be removed from the National Register To mitigate this effect, it is recommended that an interpretive program be developed for the property An interpretive space in Building 1 and an interpretive trail are planned aspects of the TerraSpnngs development Other aspects of this program might include a web site, article, public presentation, book, and/or documentary film The Washington County Histoncal society should be an active participant in the development of the interpretive program, if they so wish The existing marker, wayside, and associated landscaping elements are not formally listed on the National Register, though the SHPO considers them eligible for listing The wayside and maker should be formally documented (photographs and measured drawings) pnor to their removal As the marker is constructed of stone from the former pnson buildings, it is recommended that as much of the onginal fabnc and general appearance of the marker be retained at its new location SHPO has requested that because the Minnesota Histoncal Society (MHS) was one of the onginal sponsors of the marker, Tim Glines of the MHS marker/wayside program should be consulted regarding its future treatment Archaeology As the archaeological remains of the Temtonal/State Pnson are considered a contnbuting element to the National Register property, and as the proposed TerraSpnngs development will destroy archaeological deposits throughout the property the following mitigation measures are proposed Data Recovery A Phase III, full-scale, archaeological mitigation to take place in the southeast portion of the pnson yard where the earliest deposits associated with the temtonal-penod pnson are located (Figure 2) As no maps or images of the onginal pnson survive, archaeology is the only means by which to learn about the onginal temtonal pnson This excavation would last approximately three weeks and would focus on salvaging as much archaeological data as possible from the temtonal penod before the site is destroyed Minnesota TemtonaUState Prison Assessment of Effects Page 9 Construction Monitonng As the remainder of the pnson yard and its development is largely documented, only momtonng of construction activities in other portions of the yard is recommended The goal of the momtonng is to record the location of undocumented features such as pnvies, wells, and trash pits or previously unrecorded structures Monitonng would only occur dunng site preparation and utility trenching activities 72-Hour Emergency Recovery Plan In the event that a significant undocumented archaeological feature, such as a pnvy or well, is encountered dunng the construction monitonng, it is recommended that a 72-hour emergency recovery plan be implemented This plan allows for cordoning off the location of the feature and permits its excavation and documentation pnor to its destruction by site cleanng and construction Walls An onginal portion of the wall will be replaced because it has failed and is in need of repair The wall needs to be moved out to protect the slope from further erosion and vegetation removal The damaged wall section should be documented (photographs) pnor to its alteration The City of Stillwater has consulted with Charles Nelson, SHPO Histoncal Architect, regarding the replacement of the wall section While he would prefer the reconstruction of the wall at its onginal location, he supports the creation of a stone wall Just in front of the onginal location that will, as nearly as possible, match the original in appearance, and include salvaged stone Dunng construction the walls should be monitored by a structural engineer for impacts from vibrations or machinery It is also recommended that the walls and their associated features, such as the guardhouses be stabilized and maintained and included in the interpretive program Rums As the remaining portions of the walls of the former shoe shop and the leather and twine storage building will be preserved within the proposed TerraSpnng design plan, no mitigation measures are proposed The ruins, though, should be incorporated into the interpretation program MINNESOTA TERRITORIAL/STATE PRISON WARDEN'S HOUSE Property Description The Minnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Warden's House was constructed of locally quamed stone between 1851 and 1853 The present wood frame addition is one of Mmnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 10 several added dunng the building's history and the current version was finalized about 1910 The house is significant as the only remaining structure of the temtonal pnson and the only pnncipal structure left of the state pnson institution at Stillwater The building's penod of significance is 1853-1914, which corresponds to the prison's penod of occupation The building's areas of significance are architecture, social/humanitanan, and pnson management and it was listed on the National Register in 1974 Description of Effects The most notable effects to the Warden's House will be to the visibility of the property and the view from the property Building 1 of the proposed development, a three-story residential building, with 7,000 s f of commercial/interpretive space, is planned to the immediate north of the wall separating the warden's house from the pnson grounds Building 1 is located in the area of the onginal main prison house and cell block (1853- 1871), which was a 3-story (25-ft high) stone building This building was replaced by a 3-story pnson cell block (1872) and administration building (1879) with later cell block additions There will be no change to the property itself and there are no anticipated changes in local traffic (street alternations, traffic patterns, traffic volumes, accessibility, or parking) A traffic study by SEH concluded that traffic "will not be noticeable anywhere along Main Street" (G VanWormer to S Russell, Apnl 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater) As the development property is currently vacant, there will also be some increase in noise associated with the occupation of the TerraSpnngs development Dunng construction the building will be exposed to vibrations from equipment and construction activities Proposed Mingation Measures The Warden's House should be monitored by a structural engineer dunng construction for effects from the increased vibrations The Washington County Histoncal Society, which is housed in the Warden's House, should be informed of potential impacts resulting from construction and should be consulted regarding potential effects to the property The SHPO believes that the presence of the new development will have an adverse effect on the Warden's House Part of the mitigation for this property could be the re -writing of the National Register nomination for the Warden's House to include a better context, boundanes, and possibly the pnson walls Mmnesota Temtonal/State Pnson Assessment of Effects Page 11 STILLWATER BRIDGE Property Description The Stillwater Bndge is significant as a rare surviving example of a vertical -lift bndge construction of the Waddell and Hamngton type The vertical -lift bndge was completed in 1931 and listed on the National Register in 1989 Description of Effects The only anticipated effect to the bndge is a change in the view from the property From the bridge Buildings 1 and 5 of the proposed TerraSpnngs development will be visible Building 1 is the same number of stones as the former pnson building that was located in the southeast portion of the pnson grounds Building 5 is three stones taller than the former foundry complex that was located in the northeast corner of the former pnson grounds, but the estimated 60-ft height of the building will not nse above the 80-ft height of the bluff to the immediate north of the pnson property Therefore, as viewed from the bndge, the TerraSpnngs development will visually fill the area occupied by the former pnson at the time of the bndge's construction in 1931 The new development, as viewed from the bndge, will also blend with the general topography of this section of town Proposed Mitigation Measures It is recommended that the effect to the view from the Stillwater Bndge is minimal and therefore no treatment options are proposed REFERENCES CITED Terrell, M M 2002a Archaeological Resources Overview for the Minnesota Territorial/State Prison Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota Prepared for J Buxell Architecture Ltd and The Sweeney Group On file at the Minnesota State Histonc Preservation Office, St Paul and with the City of Stillwater 2002b Phase 11 Archaeological Evaluation of Site 21 WA96, the Minnesota Territorial/State Prison, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota Prepared for Temtonal Place, LLC On file at the Minnesota State Histonc Preservation Office, St Paul and with the City of Stillwater Former Structures Extant Pnson Walls Development plans Original Territorial Prison Area (1853.1867) Proposed Buildings Sources. Sanborn Map Comper)1884. 1888. 1891. 1898. 1904 1910 1924. 1956. 1961 Minnesota Territoria I / State Prison Project Assessment of Potentia I Effects Washington County Minnesota 0 100 200 300 40Qeet Proposed Deve I opment Over lay Figure 2 Outo Wa I I Completed by 1884 Lime Shed (c 1891 Tool House (e 1891) Hot Al KI In (c 1891 c 1898) 1 1 1 Greenhouses 1(c 1898 c 1910) 1 1 1 Criminal Insane Ward (1903 1924) \ Wood Fence (e 1877 c 1890) Leather and Twine Storage (c 1895 Present) We ehouse (1884) NO c 903 e4pois/on eoll e000 I_ (PI. O76g4ora9e p c 76g4) cll�tleg emp $ 0Inln9 R hey (188q) oom KEY Former Structures Original Territorial Prison Area (1853 1867) Extant Pnson Walls 08Q/c.9 (76,9 9 1936) Sources. Sanborn Map Company 1884. 1888. 1891. 1898 1904 1910. ]924 1956. 1961 Minnesota Territoria I / State Prison Project Assessment of Potentia I Effects Washington County Minnesota 0 100 200 300 400eet Former Structure Locations Figure 1 J BUXELL TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MN DEVELOPER FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY 180 EAST 5TH STREET, SurrE 160 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 CONTACT BRIAN SWEENEY 651-291-3591 5HEEr INDEX 00 0 001 ASD10 ASD1 1 COVER SNEEr AnuAL PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN SC 1 11 BLDG #1 COMMERCIAL SPACE & RESIDENTIAL GARAGE PLAN SC 112 BLDG #1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN SC 121 BLDG #1 ELEVATIONS ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET, SUITE 101 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 CONTACT 612-338-3773 SC 2 1 1 BLDG #2 GARAGE PLAN SC 212 BLDG #2 MAIN LEVEL PLAN SC 2 21 BLDG #2 ELEVATIONS SC 3 21 BLDG #3 ELEVATIONS SC 41 1 BLDG #4 GARGARE PLAN SC 412 BLDG #4 MAIN LEVEL PLAN SC 4 21 BLDG #4 ELEVATIONS SC 5 1 1 BLDG#5 RETAIL SPACE & RESIDENTIAL GARAGE PLAN SC 5 12 BLDG #S MAIN LEVEL PLAN SC 5 21 BLDG #5 ELEVATIONS CIVIL ENGINEERING BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429-2518 CONTACT Tom CESARE 763-843-0464 Cl 0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C1 1 DE1loLmoN PLAN Cl 2 GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL C13 UTn.rrY PLAN C1 4 STORM SEWER PLAN TO 501 BUILDING SITE Cl 5 DRAIN TUE PLAN C16 Ova DETAIL C17 Oyu. DETAIL ARCHITECTURE LTD 119 NORTH SECOND STREET •101 MINNEAPOL5 MINNESOTA 55401 (6, 2)336 3773 FAX (612)338-0060 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMINUTES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS an, 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT T165 PLAN SPECIFICATION Oft REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE HAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA EEC NO FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EVWONS COVER SHEET DATE 0228.2003 PROJECT • 01026 06 DESIGN JIU DRAWN RJS SHEET• 00 0 a J rotEmaN J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD 12* NORTH SECOND STREET • oi MINNEAPOUS MINNESOTA 55402 612)338 3773 11AX161 4338-0040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNMES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS arr HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAN SPECIFICATION OR. q.F-PORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OP. UNDER MY DIRECT RIPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA LC NO r/LOPIA. FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNSIONS AERIAL SrrE VIEW DATE PROJECT * DESIGN DRAWN SHEET* 02182003 01026 06 J H.B ELLS 0 0 1 J BLIXELL �lr��iil4il/00iv 4 ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET 101 MIV-0 NEAPOUS MINNESOTA5/ S01 (612I336-3773 FAX (61 M38040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACECOMMUNRI ARCHFCECTUR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREE GRAPHIC$ES an 4110t71* HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OK UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REG NO 0 8 30 60 90 VUF 1 50.0 rta FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION tVLA09S STTE PLAN DATE 02283003 PROJECT* 0102606 DESIGN DRAWN )ZJ S SHEET • ASD1 0 PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST IRY 6128 m1ry PIANT1WI RFNAIBIS r88B 1111 I giUM OAF. MAPLE AS/- ELM LS B&B 0 180. IM.Znow9T LII!>Zg D-_,1 -� 13620-1 BASSWOOD MAPLE LYBSB O n3. OOE•M== OW HAwnom OfEJERTIPLUM DOGWOOD All 6 T08D 79 IA 4RAC J A 8 "Per. lcI 5..6.., {tal 5e-t J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD 119 NORTH SECOND STREET •101 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55401 (61 2I338 3773 FAX (61 1038-0040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNMES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS onr 4go• 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REC NO 0 15 30 60 90 SCALE e90'-0' g 1 FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE PROJECT e DESIGN DRAWN SHEET 6 02282003 01026 06 3x9 RJS ASD1 1 1n rti Cb 2 4 21 W 149 95 '1 .S �„�,�,11-e I S. t 0 J 882s£ 229 96 S88gT_I 71.1.4393 Seo'73 00 S75S,16 - 83 99 C5 21 560.5> 40 E1 B°© QH r® U 66 S 8125 3TE' R U1 DEMOLITION PLAN r x S 79'5 256 7, S 80.34 32. E• PRO_OSED PLAN S'MB015 ABBREVIATIONS S 3rwr ss 3r� 10 1 5A)RTJ THE (APPROX.) •-•-• ROOK CWSTRUC110N E MANCE R DON FENCE CONCRETE RNO AL 91UUNOq RENO AL TIRE REMOVAL 5CA BMNCS BLDG BAN CONC- ELEENV A2 0 RRCPP0 Br1 i'D DCCmrrtls Yak GMiBala Lim Comma 1:601a An Pipe Eatungn Wad Rev D1r Intal Pcsrnam Yams madam Rana:m.a Cam. Pas v-ol-lay DEMO ITION ANDS RFMRVA NDTFS PRIOR 10 START 0f DEY00110L All ER0906 AND SEMEN, 071TROL NEASNES APE TO BE s5 ALLLO AND INSPECTED B ThE OTT 6 STD- TER 2 PRIOR TO 5 AR Cr mo10OL LL DORO ON PI 15 R00 0f 6 TO C9O9IN TE 5RM MIwME50 DEPARTMENT a TRANSPORT '10a R 5 t0E CONTR C10RY RESDONSBUIT TO ASCERTAO 1NE COG1101 OF ALL EOSTNG UTILITIES 111E COTTRACTOR SN LL WW1 ONE LOUTRYL 0.13 1100 AND ALL EOS1001 DUDES 09 OAS BER NE CONSRUC ION 5 NITS ME D005 t AROITEC CR 016ER DOES NOT CLARA TEE THAT N1 1NE U'a1113 ARE APPED CR P AP ED ARE SN01N CORRECTL COTT CT COTNER ST TE OE CALL 05 51-0002 f00, FIELD LOCATING D05 O UTILITIES CON C UTILITY ONER DAY .E COOJRS DUE TO COISTRUC110. 5 NCR TO 5T RT 6 CONSTRUCTION OSCONNEC ALL GAS AND ELI TRIO SERMCES COOED 1E OSCONNCC ON 0f EAOI 11'E1TT 11N 111E UTILITY OANUL ROUOvE A_ OAS AND ELECTRIC LINES O 142.0E BE 11ISCE4AN O15 MIS TO EE RDIOVED TN ARE OT 10EN161E7 O. THESE -A 5. TIE CON-RAC1M 6 -0 Y9 DC 911E ANC TNI-N 11R DOCUMENTS TO OB A20 DEAR UDDERS ANODIC S THE 001100E2 SCOPE Of Ngbt. KEYED NOTFS N1 0555 WAS NE ODOM B'p a RAN p SAME NO ROPE 0110515 0As7 Om, OWLS =N T CJD NO OOT7L1 A1E CWOEIE RA0R5 REMOTE WOVE ONO NO CUM ANT BR, TEAIRST AN NOV 91E LAMB PVN 1UO WY PLAN FOR P0001 LIES 6001 1 NL LION TN IOC NC x 0R O MUTT 101O1I AL 0-6 NO IE1M006 500 411116 N REM RGT-0 52 [ RE101 DOING SMb SERER TI NKOE 4101 BASK NNW NO ARTR1NAROS 41OI SAW RAN SSOE1 ARE ICI 10 E Mf1PH0 5-400I 1CP ST70 SITE 6 TO BE CAPPO WET 61 O OEM.t I14.96N0. 4F'%ti 1616,16111 6 NOT 10 BE 06TUR® [ 1-0EI DRAB[ 6 TO BE WPC 5_101 MESI O MEWL SELMNA 3 POT 10 S 06 FED C ROM E STORY 9101 PPE CM 161 96 6 OMEN OT.S MUTE All 6E400 5004. PEW 1 1DN FOR R5TA14TO0 6 T!R PPT REID TO MR RUN p MOTE SURNn WNW NO MG ID x EAST AS 110ESSTAT F01 OrN41W O 111 SA1 ART 6.10E MIR IO UNIT P1NL MOTE MI -NOT E05OROSS NJ 4-101 DIM p OR AM 6N50 NO SAGS 9O NO AMMAN= INN TO EVER ❑ MO KIM H COMM t001[1E 90E6111 6 ND110 E MDUEO UEESS NOTED 01WOSL p NUN POE 5 01 10 BE WNW p 0050*7E R0dOvAL AND 06C95E0001 Cr CASE TY OECNC 05 No 102.1501E APR®RA1E UILIIT 0505 All CAW 11 OSCTRC GAS NO 1E.01.04 6 Al ROOTED 40I 9M NO ECNl 06P0O 6 OFT 9r p OSWNECI OOS= PTO SEVMS 10 K STEM OTT 6 SDLLN1O S1N0005 ANO SPE61OT0S N. NATO SERYS W MI X59ON1S Aa0 019010 0 05 ARE TOE Mae NO LEGAL ECNOSm 6 OR STE COOO 001! N3 NON IN 06 CD 6 STUNNER p DI11 P013 ME 00 IX RO MEO NO LORI 0645 6 6F 91L ▪ DMN BATTLE 00005 NORM911 NO 11.09010E WA ARE 10 R S4YLLZD A10 REMMC 10 OPE p I0 TEENC 5115 ME 10 Et 5BA406 PER S 1E 6 M060' 69MRBd1610111 13 YD 004106 o DOOM PADS ME ID If 1006 NC LTG. WO= 6 m 91. IIWPO400 Ma TAM 6 10 BE MATED NO WAIL OSIOvm 7 6f 91 0000 0 1 NE F0LO5 ALL Ip5S 05AR1PJ 6 IEN11 FILES NO REDLAD06 © NOR 10 STAIN 6 01616160. DE =TRAM 6 TO 001111 P0901 AO SROOm1 N 140011100 ANY (61 f SO. TIE 0 W 1O 6 10 BR®A16 ONTAO DE MOLRCE ® CORM TEION Ml 00100100 NO TIOTNC ® MOEE SSE TORTE 0640 1160C 6 N0 10 E DS-O® ® ROA NE ENCLOSED LOOM 0001 ND ROOT= COOOMAIE RETONL LIM WIN DR ARO,E NO SMCIIIN DONOR ® IE1101E CASDC 001011 0 01,. 00100R ROOM LOTS 61 16 NOMWO NO 6110 JUL 00011 ▪ OXIDIC DAM INS TED BOW ODM BUT 501E DIMS VT_ ROAN TAXING KY MIS ARE TO CONMN 0051106. D0 BAST DEERS IMS MN RECORD r D0RS ® calm "WI ME 10 rem O06NEID ® CAWS NE TO R OA 110611/E01 ® N1 IRIS EOM MO COBS NE 10 SE ROOM NO am. =Porno war 901E ® ALL 005D10 111110100 P 661 NO 00 ORE I0 BE 1606 MD EGN0 0709D O 6T MIL IE ILL 006 PADI1 GAPS 160 31 5 AIE TO BE ROOTED ANT ESN1 CASTO0 6 OT 9R © OD BA1I5 IRE 10 Mum UNDSM® ▪ SEMM GLAD IWSE 6 10 TOM LR6N®. J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET B101 MINNEAPOUS MINNESOTA 55f01 (61203B-3773 FAX(612)3300040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNrES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS BKBM 05-rm- Prom0•RMLNIS9 An "01114•0e. smati M ass .kr Inn dn. man ass Isc,s, Latassa Mamma ma.. TNw R K asnme BMW Bunt so menu. far el aemadx n Mn m m. ens f." N. _Marv.Ws TM s oar ataF aw..umM and s . aft ferment., r a0,a '.01> .w .. m...� we -"A :Dnn AN am de.0 0 30 CO 120 180 SCALE 1"- 691 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS: DEMOLITION PLAN DATE PROJECT A DESJONt DRAWN SHEET P 0221.03 02217 CO TJC 6LR C1 2'D a Record S.Lr.it0i :t MIRC `Alp OV4WALL R. n 0 ■ 04- 06 OR 4T4 11111114r_ • • M ▪ la a LA. 1R U U U GRADING, DRA NAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN as . 05.5 ' r Mit OR so.. STEEL ma Pam POSTS Smi. • arty . N M CO. a Rum R earn. DO 0 106 Ago coos. 1710 TH SIN SEDIMENT FILTER COTATRI. FENCE (ORANGE-001 ORFD) CoSIM l CPS sal ss Tyr►` Jl.�► � yr .�' fr '.. n S. 1. l5* T/ a FOO OH mm:1.01 R TOMOCE1 ACC. 12 o4..YPP 0 010 .i® ROCA ¢Tu1.2 A•e wake IOT4 CP_SO PET ATO Mn 0 4224 0224 ALL w MO OASSMw YORE RcaA n 4mrO T M1 SATO.. mlrr w w EtOgieSTRUCTION ENTRANCE Jf I L I PROPOSFO PLAN EYMBOI5 SETE 6 W.E - - - - PROERTT )AE - - - P OPOSEO CONTOUR -• --- SROT STOR CRTC ORON/NARNOIE • ■ St. **1ECE ROOK O 1CSTNC a ER TRAP Y�r ABORFVIAT)ONS BLOC - 64. ma • Caten Doe n Men an o=Om DIST Enome Dao S. 1Y AM= =Teo. Cow � m mY De GF\ERA NOTES CAIRAC9 w.0 COR tor'sm. ST IS CM -Mal. Tq 14641221 MIS WO A aG •a .10= Ca61RCCT0. PC 04T10 Qi1M1 )0*10 TAO DO ROO 4( 0 wpm w ( )) MT- w Ofa= aC1.. 1.0000.0 TAMS ma1DCAO01 a MO MD .2 1.6 030100.. AQPO M 04 IOMOw� AISO TN II .� RAY a COMMA ▪ OTV.'lw •*4L I6D-�CVT M IM O P T. Cr 6520 MOTTO 1. TOPC004 0 6.611 CwV06 YP M RCI APT CV 0160 T 606.6 Co Y101PYD M COMM >Y'Aft Ouone MTDnx Sues =ST s An Da 006.1100, w M R Sin M mourn a not, . TO P1Am.[ N. 1110. A COOT Y16TMALLw f =0 L 4'41 . 0010 M4L EC 4e.CAO 5001Aa ODA T. MAD OE 0031131 WO= AMR W 00 .p* 0PII1 AT TAOJT0 PRIM= Da TO DD. STELP06 TO 60.0 001 M DM Da SULL 1[ M*0LO Rosuen es 10� m OMi001 i. v1. 0000 wma 00111.Ale 101 ?A11 I22. TS =AS 4TOERCD TIC =TROLR 6. 4TwO CR Duel PUCE L0 06.04 1 COW 46.03 u10uM 45 MTw eARR RSTWV V. AS SC. VIM PLO. Y COOT1w RSO1 Cam ER SM. �-101 PR n.An DwE�6= 04b1224 OEM (0100 w) O TOPS. TO . YEAR IM O N Ol�1T• 001 R,OL4S Y0ODmi rt. YL TOaw Y u0 202224 COMPS 06 OAS TILLS 13,6110 aM.4aVP M 9I*05 Off T 044. 6.O6 TO 16Lw PRwa. ea. •1uT 410606 .00 swn AP 4r . MO(. o C OUTa 0 71 RCUM w.a TO SAw.T On Tai 4n 6. Smart .. SToWU 113.0 4O OM.= Ou TOfm 6E00 T 06.101 11Ginc sera Tout CO aa4LLa OECD=RRol R6 11oi WPC.. Kona. Nowa Na c SIR T �s 0 00= SWA e[ =AM OPRR MT 712142 aa.RlRuelel MODS 3 100N5L60355 Cr M CCM= R1n0T *T1W01 PEW A. SCR 06TY.2 M*ER41 MALL 000O M =MD =T5A21w 4O 016 R CORM IO4L MU R a IL 605 110014 SRC 0 1O w01 Of1w 0L MOS OeY 1O P.MC van (10.4 ID0 =CR= an u.. 016 m m e . won 000.E POP 101/00 sirnf as m.+a•w Mal .STALL 1.6 ,u. W RD= M 15 6301, OwAOI M Y4 CLOW= WRAMC no MVO Ale PREY. s1Au mm PTO MI 44,1m 60. DOD TA.m rw os UC•22 44,2 COAT.¢ 1412 ,aws AWAY O.DIAC. VAII 10'A4 M Tv 0 S100ATER .rr aPAi 11436106 Y 10 1 OF.00 Pw M TL D w Ttu ySRPM. 1u51 ORSEME u O. wTMO w EL 04 M Y DIOR 00 TT1 )• \ COOL 1O5 TO L616 TUF JCL 1001.1. YO 03603 C1 V •T01 0 .d1u 60/OR 00616, awe A10 w1rz +16110 06 CO OTT o TUMOR aCCM.a =160 L4 TO COOL m MO w.ic 1Pa0e.SVC* s1..T .rmuw. PPP= T 0. 1®1u DLOAS= IC. 0171 A4TUTT 0000 ID LI= ADO OTT De TAD 6 Y-CR Oa m 41. MO * OT00670 SA4 TO R1pO2 M 004T MOOR• O ERO'[D1 R.p 4 .�PC .0,i40YA CC. C 0, Mu0m A04 066 nY w OW 0 TRut Itvv. 24 4- Sa ST.00 OD 10 Co Ce3006 R• 01 .061 04 YL NOT 0 S® WU ■ 6E0 MO FRCSNIA WV Au 02-124 mT'.a 4: TO la IC ACRID LP. CS ILICR Are v TIES =TAW m.Mo Oi 60=3 C?7n 006 RO M a.1060 O 91▪ 1006 QaO ra0T.w1G T4Tww rz T WI 0.6 APO ▪ La Dir[ O 4 ]TSD CO00 RR. All PO= =DM 1C Sw4 4 4 =m Kfw A1AC5 OA4A m.M AC. TOS OCOCO 4QSSM 510 CM OR MT1RPm ODO ..m w or. M 000. Z IC d 06 M 4oJET 0, DO0../OR Orz.00 Rout. WALL K M O[T 60 ■O.. O. M Y.= OUMO 0.M 1036 PRA MuceAL Poo RN y TO O■ TO TM TTLO! 0 RIC.. K VM PO. 1604501n T10 rON Tuse1.a1 0 O= 6.i DV PRO M4n w m4.*) SAW EC lmna 41m.011 1a. YSN:9 APO TPS TO PROM TRA.900 0 SO= W'.W qs i 4 CR w 19* P.O C*a nla TO.0l 10216 00.6. CO O+ES c w COS SOME,�4w rnmi M It w 0 e*. ROADS T 00 R06.1. 06 Sow EC su.eD To 0661 Raw .CC TM 001 06010 AO R04.0. Ma. T A.SOLS IOTA KA. 94 94w.m 01010 1 a um . caiolTn er CM u uvs®.. DOOM SE 624122 OAK 4 01.11Tnn n Oo Cor OW. 0Ai100 14.4 II R1f060 PPO.. .O 0.000 40.14 4./OR Y 00 0, M OTT 0 MTOPO 0 1361014 COMM 006 low 0 DOD 613 u ARO ram M apt Raw s S TE CO6'NCOT OPERATOR C .1.6 STOATS 6.0 w YIERPD• nM C OPOS. 0RM 1O. 6= TIC 4 SE T0✓Q r 1C0 1w MOP e=MOS LAo. M w AS ROW AOA A IS C.T.. suarTa. a4. Y NOT ACM. LACIER01 OR AREAS MA NALL . S WA 0 Oma u0 Y.am 6 ( TV �>k. =TRACTwOR WV 0.6 Or. T. noo TT .O .A101346 R. TO AP.SICAlk. w We, ue 14 w Sm0 ARCO MaL • 0.0 .D 06C-Y000 w COMa T A.aa u.¢n PR-11.0 SRO LAOS. 5 1*4*16 CO POMMOT sou I OD A100P0 .R 222422 As 2 RAZ or .D 1css 50 I Tn To6 PER , v' a .O uT 06 TM CO.. M 1 TO V0.* ARC TO TO T 4-OSN®/0 00 1OPCM 0004 OCRS a OF =CO CCM. . Cr OAR = DC 00000 MD nen r Kna APIA au TOII 000.010 PTO REM CR= Tor SO IDM .Ro.mE PER n tM COO CP Sm .01.4 oar SO RATE 0 SO PO= PO ACC 0.06 OCRS OR DOAla IINm 1Wu .T4TAPm r.nL TM 6 COMM=.O 3ta4A4 01 * 0Y T 61 O .wm 0 4*040 5 n o M ufluTE CEswrow01 4 8090 0nNra-a us. ADD smw'.c'MT COMM. MAceca XS rz..ca.R2400 41TT. To.en�0 0.-SITE S OT. MI 6 iM WPm. +. 101 Cu ST MOO DMA Q Ruwa •Pn 0 .[.= MOE 0166� RM=CR 1w MVO PROM= T1(. A4 .01 W OO a.PC O.SOKTwO ON 4raLR. PTO R O.= 00.0 0.6 16= V A.0 0 R[ TOO M T� OO root TOW IC TWO buls ARm .Rau o 4L f 1 w10 M urc 1C 001 40 out. tarmacs MVO. TO et, aaTOKR TAIL A.ROTO R.S amour_ M � R WO lA M - TO COT. ° a .u. RA SE =CPU ALSO ROARS sty Qu00.3.. naC1611 . 0.61 1c. awwu• SD. Man wR16 so t0 0 ...A OF V= SIM 40 140E sot. tic ATIO =APSo SE POTWO TnMT COMM. Rm 01 .L Tm s4+ amni Mu uo Am M0 O OSTAALa 111. iW41OTAO M 440 O OMAPDO'. RO RCS =�=a1a�u0wCRS040 .Y : To0 *03Oi m0 LA DAMAsAO M e P OO o OR. 4Twa II 46. 794EMI6 AR.T M C Mo .mDO amrT 50W 6nwTMC w 4w'703 Seel mom °561m .a .o .4o OWL a w4m ewn1m 03.16. CI 06. 0.1116 MOILS20** BE 1001a a Y066T MET4o/w VAT.. M K YED NOTES p v.c alne n A.ws wen AO Roam Em s m m cur. R RA4n m* MTw .O. w 0.6 r ORTER TO 6 : CoS6 lad ma 4v WC. m�'io.�a c 0. 60 tarot TO RUM =1n 40 omo Row.Row... v.w TA ▪ >R oNOCR .ARE TACIT AM.m a 10. R. -w M PER OTT T..4m MO p RO° a m.a 06T /n PTO MSS SM.. 160.0 T. PRAua W. Aw T0.60 ❑ ROT) 10 r R. 0 0 CO.00Tl M M09 Hw M10 UTE TD M Em7P0 -ww T. LTD DI Ars T. ❑ Raw a try �yen /0 PTO sou arose IIa5a.11a p REID 10 x1AA OCR /CT PV SO= CROSS TCTO. K ❑ RFD TO AL ■c. 10 PTO 0e1• SS aoo-a. ❑mw Axw»m1 /0 61 OCT Cos =T.TO. -2 D M.ww 40.0 ID TA.A M a .a ON TOY 21E Rah TO ARM R41 0 p 100wA n105 1,011.10 en cum at Y YP.o.. E... DISTURBED AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 7 93 ACRES J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET ,101 MINNEAPOUS MINNESOFA 55401 (612233013773 FAX (612)336-0040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNRIES ARCHTTECFURE LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTURE GRAPHICS eKsn� Pa....015600210 Pe<m 4 aN v.e1 rro leg Gam. n. G A4 Do III a3 pv Y u•A9u a Vans,0 co V Knows WW d m too. re Too 118-.1 AOMA V mar to Pon+.h w Pau Oun.. en T ay.r r.TM forma m Mb r the ri. lr w. Rr taaran 0 30 60 120 180 SCALE 1 30' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS[ GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DATE PROJECT* DESIGFt DRAWN SHEET 0. 0221.03 02217 CO TJC SLR C1 2 5 ,,l,,,, tf41 5<1- U13UTY PLAN 39 KnP wows az Sc u0P. 06 D scrum F.O.m10 r Stmia.lef a•V 2 [O P031 r5.0. MS On 0 ra PRP. NO 6T 0170114, M P.rus a-wp 2P / %oe< a 5* TN. 60m 00. 77. worm • mu. O soar 40 000 1L *0 2 mc" C. 06 ..0c .0.06 n7a9 �wm�Ec CONT90. 0.0. 00 . R. yP 91.om 104 0NON00 NO 0mr41 Am Ip ACDOOD 0 OO7e® Lv.®7a (3] *NL 4-.EN Sea oA 715 OT. 0401 •0d ❑ S. or.. -Oa, PT SEMI 5+751 r.m •ILLOD CC.. D7 LOCA. 00 U17 0. OM *00440.. ▪ eTN1 A1n 1Pr�..1 .AO 0010 •P D-7 0 rum/0 5*wwa m 000 Toa ❑ .O1.0 FPO t0O 60 4 LP r110 10 hw0, ad1t ¢0 11.0 00 ws ❑ .6TNL 0..040 OUP PO Po w7 RP ❑ MTNL snot PP ...1 6u .1O 000P 4.7 uan Rao. 0e.s.9 000Pcs.•.77 148,m01011209 ❑ .BALL O-FW h.w CI m .O 00m 61m. POP TO W0OL11.0.0 *4800 .OI 8.'E77r57 sR N.O.n r9.a Apm.OD Pf CAMP Poo ®'Q'u rod OOP To 1. a�0 CC.. /00 KO Po. NO 9• 0a 0 'PEEP O m DP O TMC7a. TNt 030/10 P tO00 Awo T.w7 0.. a.0 m.71m 0 MPG 0-00. 9 Ma.N1 DP 087 m NO YID to OPP DPP PP. O PLUCK ELL WISP NO PO 011 Pa. f0 .T451 01C0110 11 18 ION .405 09.060.4.0 NO 7N POP 0 UIN 0 0 P. m 000 PA 0 um.0 un 040 IN 0 Q1 4F.417 a 0a.0 fta0 m e[ m0 .L. 0+0 ..c OGLE 5-41' ...C. ' L1E7 70..n 7. .0005 D.C1 Poo EN MO LP DE. 17m + 0040/ . COO7.'.m POOL TODO mOTNCFa er P T`a'..ea 5 CP .. P n e�ON90 cup... i9090� R o.cr .wnd m9 aw RL M, C~S,4PO P.. Car .C1m PP TO Ltu 10070110 70 7*160 00*01[ DP wG m MP RAM D OPm ld .1 1..0Wu os swum �*m ammo P TO �007 0 CM.. DUCT 10Fn. NO DP 1714 ▪ *ten. SHP PLa x�E2mn+'�2.c*a0.a'm m sus W6�m mega 00*075 Kvcr LOU. No .L1RT 5 611▪ .P `07ro .e1Ro-Nw CCP. m�.mO A 51.R7 m'OF*ODDL.IC IO 7ma CC.. 11. .wtn, .r9 ® .6. yd LC. re. LEI. ta7 Om 0 0. matt 6Y7 Om ss 4W&T? Fvtt SEICPEN .O P EN EP.. a0. 1OaN. 110+01011 MK. m STM OF 07a011ro 2 t9• ar. r-am .m s10 LIA3v M 00.1 O.Co.O PP EP 00 7013S. COOau2 DP Fc.to. Aro .0.7 65.1. Ov .mwax CPO.. MOT m 510 Or f IDL9d E.T r5N (. 7-00. f10aC... ren 00 ernes . 71 0K7. 0 0a[uC7.a00 MDT.wo T =7, m Pp 14005 Hem m... Sm0omte. >R 0.R ▪ 04.6 2.4m OP TM DM OOLP. CP.. PO T. O700 61 wTai0 COCK. mtOP Ne R2 DLY P7 MI Ia t.�.c nnc�wa.1ca POD TOO S. a 010.0111 .TNA CEO.. DPad7u1 CPI.. ® 00 070 PAN T01 Pam m *TN. /LT .P Lam Aso CONS 7440mma.�pu MCI Two 5 POY1 .O 0 700 .7 0.e0®0 PLOD O 0.031 CORIG® 7[10 .P.O TOP ® Low..PO mu mr9L.' qR s 00 07 sow: 0r6m 0 minim 0 *000 m•0.10 TR.. 9an6 ItIM 00 m 6*7.. /0 cm c 1010510. 0 ,a pun e.96 M tve.st r1E T.m 0910.F7 CI.. 0a .IOC vw0.a 0 700m 80 •FP TO D. FP *OP ® ..0. 6aPL PRO05m Er-.m APrim sna CUM 00 ran. PC O*..a DTP WW1 PEP 886 "▪ "Q7 MP TO .DELVE P. TA 60*1 240 08 w u. oRa GUILE+ m s 40.iD) 1 STOW11•1OA,Pmirt. fA77.1 r9UCN4 .OR a PP u'P d706O 90. TO 6[ DP. 1P 110.04 ® ID• Pp Urn m0aL n CIP..0R SIOU . TO6ro.0 THE 171.186 101. OR1Yman.KibCODS roe me as won 0 tror u11P mNW En101- m OE 000.0 Natm-wm ..0. O (.1501ER WV 7Al. 011 01.0. EC4n m4Tm T.w Go-aW] a6 TO 00. M SnK10! PPP ENE K.▪ AT70T a7P r10a 01001 m701 e51a750a01 • O 10 7..a z roe ..9111.21 RPM DO 4CT0 • 5810 vs (APPwoa) ABBRV1ATIONS Mte 1M Iwo Prow. Pt" IL0 amp .00 pp.. Dm D.. En 00 SF awe ND TS TN. e`..e Ye C STRUCTURE 0ENT81r1TION STR�CiWE (NC ES) NEENAN.... TM CAVING ELE9 D0 WERT ELE7 710 PPE IENG DARTER SLOPE EK1 950EN1 57R CURE SA. / OB 733 8959 f �08808 3 0i C MC O 0.08. SAN. 12 SM. 12 48 33 696 CO R 6199 00 89 or r P.0 0 0.00. 9611N 13 Swan 0 46 R 1 33 69820 E 669 58 7l686 78 60 BLG )ee pF y 00 �} S� / 5 692 1 1 0 IF P8,1 029 OI SAv 11 Sun. / DE DROP 88 R 33 7066 E 692 95 69860 DrBLDG 60 OF C ME O 0�0 5.76 15 A /5 .6 33 7 02 SrS E 727 38 0 r 9.'C 0 200 , BLDG 5.80 /6 O.T50E CROP N 733 698 1t 1260211p6 5[ /9288 9 OF P+C O %99'6 YIN" /7 i0 of 6�P.0 o xa01t (LULL SANG 17 6 R 733 0 S 695 60 25 OF C PVC 0 7 DOD BLDG J BUXELL ARCHITECiURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET 8101 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55601 (6111338-3773 FAX (612038-0060 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNITIES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS BKBM PPaPr Omso r. .. .rvr..e.+ 90.0 a x[ SRJCNRE DCF99CATO B1 BC"L E D 0L913" (MC NEEr7Al, CAS, 7.. W E.F/ CoOr. OK. 70N PE LENG0 DONE1ER TX E 6 'co UPORI ST1Eu1 SCFIIRE C0 / 60 342 6)253 EFIE. 7 i CS 2T O 010.000CB CO 1 60 43 7 694 2 0, RRCCPP 22p L 99 F 09 222.0' P 0 0 75%0'.g5y/N36I2 5N 12 68 R 733 6973 q.,? 1117779 LL4r O 0p�p6.x OeEM-Ni 579 13 66 13 7888 jPSE,( pa71T gW�9C y0 29 L . A 2r RT 8 OD;. 7)C 7'IN D. PEED (SEE 0') (SLT DTL) (SEE c "' a9�'71"0 l5� s L M r PV' a O DOS, SKN ! Pm MK (SEE 020 (SEE on.) (SEE 3 ) 60 1 F 0r ?0 RCP 0 1 00% CB /I2. (SEE 011.) (SEE DV (SEE 7L) WE 69B 5 g9�8�176 5 L8 S RAC a 6.81 90 155 5DC ++MR (SSNnOE)) 40 33 70 0 E 69 B Lr W r Pr 0 L OOP!. OCT .9: (S JE .8 R 733 7050 }}3 5ME 55a r W S RC 0 opo5, 5T0. /a , 51P /6 .e R 733 8699]5 i 61 3B •70.3 eJ k Oi f RCP 8 bJO 009 5. 99 CO /7 2 36 R 3360- 7030 S 99990 0 L 0r 6 PKC O 05v0 CB 13 C9 1a 2 36 R 3360 0_0 0000 S"10 /9 .e 506 058 S E990t 12 LLss pyy PrCC Y ,8 FE 119 CB / 0 2 36 3360 706 F 02 95 703C5 OL W C e.E OOSOR CB1 B 1 2 36 R 3360 706 703 0 B 12 *0 R 342 05 S. 183s 722.010 C Mt 0 O. 0/CB ! 3 a13 b 3.3 053 E 69999 60 L OF C MC 0 0.00. C9 / ..8 /� 68 .3•2 02 700 00 3 po l b 33 06 N F q 5 3 3 L .DOFF TY M.P 0 0 SR 5129 1 6 C. / a Fa 733 70.9 1 .1 51 L 4 cI 8pT'P55 O O'ASpi, S Y ! 7 8 33 05 YYpp^I�� 699 9 g5015 pOfF 50 LF or 0 0401 O OR CB 122 B 12 2 Ji 3067 7056 E 7075a N 02 5 0 Ld OF C N: O 0 not CB 1 9 CB / 2 36 3360 705.6 5 702 110 09 120 2 36 R 3160 7030 6889995 LF or C P.01 0 0505, 00 12 CO 1 2 36 R 3360 7030 0000 CB 122 se R 342 0 6 5 6999 38 0 C NC O 0500. CO /23 C58123 9 342 7036 70060 (S 1712R) 48 (SEE D1L) ( EE 07) E 7%1 8 8 LF 0 It RC 0 00% FES 12 917' 120 / / / E 702.00 O.TLFT 125 / / / 5 70.50 99 F of r NDPE O 0501 CO 126 CB /26 *8 0 342 7080 E 705500 7060 236 L 0 r NWC 0 0.707 CO 12 00 171 *8 03 7 E 70950 25 LF OF IT 70 0 000/ (la /2B CB fa.8 3 7 25 5 70950 FES /29 / / / S 0600 29 F OF r RCP O 200 ROOF 3 00721 130 / / / 706.50 38 LE W 5 RCP 0 0758. ON /3 /3 / 733 7 E 107 m N 7C7 0 8' P,C 0 0 2R C0 02 9 L K. 1OF )r RCP 0 2OGk ROf)F : CO 132 / R 9 7 9 Ne 710 0 LP. W C .yp 0 0.402 CO /33 CB /33 s8 R 342 7 0 SE 707.02 FES 13• / / / E 7200y000) 3 LF W Y RCP O 20016 ROOF 2 CB /38 48 R 342 6 55 N r9Qq.p7 B6 Li 0 2*' RC 0 0505. C8 /3 co /3 .a R 342 70 0 ii 6y000 20 L 0 s 9/08E 0 100%. CB /38 CO /38 60 3.2 7023 E 69. 20 R 69929 16 Lf W s NDPE 0 002 CB I39 CB 139 00 3.2 A35 E j9pp95 29 L . 0 S OP'e .008 CB /.0 CB I..e R 3 2 23 7pg30 116 L 0 C PVC 0 1 000 GUY / 1 VIM I 48 R 33 90 E 500 68 LF OF C Pot 0 0508 CB / 2 CB 12 .B R 32 796 E 76.34 FES /43 / / / 5 70500 39 LE W I' CPO 200A ROOF FES /N / / / 3 70300 3 LP OF 2' RCP 0 2001 ROOF 5 FES 1 5 / / / Pew 6693 50 37 LF W r 770E O 0000 09 146 CB 1 2 36 0 33E0- 6969 4 B 3 (01i OF C WC O 0503 CB / 7 CB 1 2 K 36 3360- 6969 Y 893 Fa /.e / / / SR 693 75 30 Li 0I Y 00C O 0.503. CB 9.0 CB 2 36 3560-6 6 9 NE 69J 90 SR 69390 0 LI 0 C Pl: O OSOE. CB ! 03 050 2 36 1360- 6969 E 6966)13p.9j5 /5 N/ / 69 aSUB 8"O966 4,3 LF OF C PE HOPE O 000. CB /52 CB /52 DTL 5/C 6 / 8929 E 699 2 30 Lf W 6 PEP NEPE 0 002 08 /53 CB 153 IR5"R 10 5/C 6 / 6932 E 69927 0 76 2J. M C E WE 0 005 CB /Ss 03 154 p0EGF DEL y/[ 6 / 6956 895 E 6955656 73 I f OF C PFR POPE 0 4.11118 1-. 155 08 159 PI/CO 6 N/ 699 E RRW+VSMWN .3 R 1 33 692.0 66699978 566'8!/ 1 L, pf p0�, 511p pale? BC '*4 0 2 50. CO /59IS7 '.,UF1N50RMN •e R 33 692.5 566Vyg 66999 2.8 L OF E 0.0 0 .201 CO 158 CO /58 / / 6996 S5 W 8g9g6) 126 LF OF P.0 0 1203 DUMAN DRAM CO 159 / / 69 0 N 66693 49 L OF B- NC O 2 SI CUR4NN DRAM 17 S THE CONTR C70R 5 RE9PO15e)177 10 ASCER AN THE 0C T0. OF All E0511NG DUDES ME CONTRACTOR 9-ALL 9E9E9 1IC OCA1I01 ELE9 110. 70 ARK ALL EOS11.G DUTIES 40 OURS BE -ORE 00N51RUC ON STOATS. THE E"0NEE2 AR007EC0 01 0.71ER DOES 0 OJ 9M7EE 14 ALL THE MARES ARE AMP 01 UPPED ARE 9/0. COROEC11. OM CT OWNER 5 TE 04 CALL 05 5 0002 F10 i1ELD LOC MG EB57Lv0 L 7 5 CON CT UTUTT OVER F ACE 0001R5 DUE 0 C015T171.417071 �90 0000004 BMW En Bs.w e a Oar en al Da90 10 T9a m9 an cop▪ a. au Deg 0 DT .nee..4_ TM ma ▪ bm 0 .b9. . D.2LF cm ▪ a na be 03 ee9W PI b ne coo on C*P90 2000 0 P mar. 0 30 60 120 lea SCALE Ta 30' EBIN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SZVISIOM81 UTILITY PLAN DATE PROJECT 17 DESIGN DRAWN SHEETS 0221.03 02217.00 TJC Cl 3 5LL1.... isc .l 54- oa ae Zoos UTILITY PLAN -w KEYEn NOIFS, EOTO Now FIE NB . K O o. m5 NA. ❑ .NP W 04 o 06 . P00 IOC 1n1I.AcIO1 m MM. a.DI.K MPS. Wool 4K1 EEL CCM. 11. [WINS WATER uE Y41 NO E1000 ALL KC190 9p001 OR W.S 9WS IAIA. ALARM OF KV SMS P SKI 00 .q R011 05i UA WCSISLEAMI APO MOr ODTOII 11xm100 01 MOM= MO WE CA M MACE AO MOW ILL K®MR AMMO S� 4T10 O STOW 400 YO MICRON MOVE O MER ow MARES P 1 01001 OOAREO. V" M00Vn TOW STAMM= AEO SRPW001 MOM d• 41P KL i SOW. © ORME 4104 000 Si NO oTT ` ERAS 00 n 0*00 ALL 6 .w A. MOMv o-.m LINKER K. 100 Mee - CU Cowes CCM wYEnL CALMIME n R4010:1 Sm ei WTc vc lon O I0W04 Ire PM. OM 10 10191 corr.. T R 101E CONTR CTOR'S RESP0151IJIY TO ASCERTA T14 OCAIIQ. OF ILL ERRING U TILIZES NINE COETRACIOR DOLL YEWS1 TEE LOCATON ELEV 010N AND MARE ILL MST G LIMITER AI HOLES BEFORE C0.51RUCTIW STARTS RE ENGINEER ARCI1IECT OR DINER DOES NOT GUARANTEE TN T ALL 1N_ VIW11E5 ARE MAPPED 04 IF RATED ARE SNOB. COIIECTL CON C CORNER ST It ONE CALL 65 5E-0002 FM FIELD LOCATING COSMC BRUMES CON C UTILITY WRIER F DAMAGE OCCURS DUE TO LYJNSIRUCTCN PROPOSED PI AN SYNSO S PIEVCRIV d1a 6010011 W S1OM ECM 02000 ROM AIRE MI MEOW RAMO LAE 10010 ) S • ABBR0\ATI0NS s.e CB ® ONh E% Se. AO. • 100001 CLAN i▪ 0N.1 Trz dir.rod FloorOrr bawl rodarr Grc ITS Sb.S 4" SEA. J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STR.E1T 1101 MINNEAPOUS MINNESOTA 55401 (612036 3773 FAX(612)338-0040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNMES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS BKBDwry" cm a. Lerrero ...,rocro prow CESAA- nw TM n..trnmemns 000 IAN> E0 or Ed rron 0100,0 0, 0- Or I. moots. ero Au .o b R r IN SRI from, "I "roar, 01 pert. roan .n s or no ad roar roar la 0v. M> WI AA A0011 . rot ram ormo.a -op En loon ^0 vrea 0 30 BO 120 180 SCALE 14 30r O N NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS' STORM SEWER PLAN TO 501 BUILDING SITE DATE. 0221.03 PROJECT It 0221700 DESIGN TJC DRAWN SLN SHEETC1 4 J BUXELL 303, U DRAIN TILE PLAN SN PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS OAT. 030 POO .0 010 43300.N104 • ■ • 8-- ABBRFVIATIONS Do. Om OPAN. • Do.nn O 6. 3.11 RR DODD Om 13. O W 3,301 PO ▪ Da. 3.4 IMOD DRAN TILT GENFRA NOTES REFER TO DETAL 6/0 6 FOR T11R.R RAI WDEN DRAIN 14E 5STN0A1101 0W 7LLE B RAW OMOEN/LOW AREA GREEN AREAS ARE TO BE CONNECTED 10 U1ON BASINS MOSE SUR00 SS, TON PROVIDE POST* DRAINAGE IN DRAIM nu ALL TIMES. GROUT SEAL ALL PE70-12 'IONS 1 REF01 '0 DETAILS 7/C 6 B/CI R 9/C 6 AND 0/CI 6 FOR CRAW TILE UNDER ROAD TS DRAIN O E 5 TO BE COdEC1U TO STORM SERER CATCH BASINS 014 STORM SEVER 40101E ABOVE THE SUM WV 0'1 PROVIDE P09 OK DRAW GE 9I 0RAN 111E I ALL TIMES. GM SEAL ALL PONETR ORS 3. REFER TO CET LS /C16 2/C16 MD 3/C 6 OR DRAW TILE WSIALEA11O6 T BUILDING PER5ETER AND NOER L06ER LEVEL FLOOR SLABS COGRDW 1E CORECTT° 10C TRW MD 41,1 O. MTN NE0440CAL CONTRACTTDL 9. R07 TO DETAIL /C 6 0R CUR AIN DR. MOUND PERIMETER OF STE WORDS TE MUTTON ARO ELLV TON 0 CONNECTION 0 00TEAMAL USE MIN The MECHANICAL COA0ACTOR 5 THE CORM C10R5 ESPoNSBRI TT TO SCERTA0 THE LOCATION 0 ALL MONO U1)1ES THE WNIRACTOR 91ALL VERIFY TE LOCATOR ELEV 1I0N AND 4B ALL Ely C UTILITIES b HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION S' RTS TIE ENGINEER M01 TEC 0R MINER D00 0 WMMIEE TN Al TE UTILITIES IRE APPED OR IF NEED SHOM CORRECT CONTACT GO E ST 'E ONE CALL T 65 54-0302 FOR EU) OUTING EOSIWG 71.11E5 MST CT 10.1Tr OMER IF DAMAGE OCCURS DUE TO WNSTRJCTON THIN DRAIN DATA — NORT LOUTION 6EM01U OA Ef1SNd GLIDE ELEV 'ION R0005e0 OWE ETV '10N 10, CURTAIN ELEV 110 B0TTO CURTAI ELEV '10A 7205 7200 7 60 7 0 2 790 200 7 0 7100 3 700 55 725 7055 4. 20 7 0 7090 7020 5A 095 70 0 7040 6990 6 707 0 703 5 70 5 606 0 711 7043 7030 70 0 69 0 6 7020 7025 7005 6960 ATA — SOUTH IDUT10n DENIIUTON El6 FRG GRADE ELEWITO PR0o05ED 010E ELEV.T100 0P CU6W ELE0 PC BOTTOM CLWIANR ELEV 0 s 7203 720 7 70 7 00 25 7 90 7 0.0 7 0 090 35 7 B 7 6.5 7 5 707 0 5 7202 7 35 7 05 7020 55 7 3.6 7 0 0 703 0 70 A es 709 0 700 2 7062 700 0 75 7043 7010 7000 09 0 05 7000 6995 697.5 6955 90 695 695 5 693 5 690 0 DUDE r NARM rnrs.1 20 DOMu a NORA MI6 ODD 03 PAP GDRAII�RTAIN AROUND BOTTOM PERIMETER OF WALL NOT TO ARCHRECrUKE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET 5101 MINNEAPOUS MINNESOTA 53901 (612030-3773 FAX (6120380040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNMES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS BKBM 30231333.3.034.44 Rees 11•31003.30 DE 8030. .N a.7 Dos .In Il eac .NN BNB a0.s an DO3P 0, en 033 0o0;a or DPP., aIW9 au 0T u erma m�unw rcvm 10a us. Dew MINea Dm 03 Ow end 1. nO p 10 so rHy a 1w.33 .1 No DOD Anw. we Du or 10 Canal 001'P 2006 4 400 Dora 0 30 60 120 160 SCALE 1 =30' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISIONS' DRAIN TILE PLAN DATE PROJECT I - DESIGN DRAWN SHEET IP J BLIXELL Rees d 5i,b,.37CeD 5„i- 01100704 ..TIO ma..10 OOP TO v nm new LMa M.O. CROSS -SECTIONAL LAYOUT P.OVWI[D E'1E ONO MO Rm.am ___ -_ u w 1 am ��c 00 ma 010 Ent NN1!! 04 RT0 QDRoRrAgZI.R.1)SCHEMATIC OE MOTs saE SFCTION E2220 Ea. 00111.a =TLTK 4m T.' a L.610. u] P 12. .al lW042.0 M .r14 00 9.IP.a 00 m eihgeftt4TREET CROSS SECTION C-C u ▪ n.M arm IM MEms SLOPL Puss sort RP OM 000.30 ow CV 0SO 1m Ora rzm SOLO MC / mw� .OLD ..c ...Da PLAN eV OP 10 T10fs.. 0000 0.13 3,EIT ui* I. 07.0 9APa0110 E 1' D1Eram .ac M 3733 TIE 00 vum .. 110 PVC 01.1102 OAS w0 tuns, 2.0 a 0.2ss 1.0 LP .vwar 41110.6, 0110 E220. 1CO- *o+t SS.i ©01101 L 43SXMCE m4 WM mspeg TO M. YP A TREET CROSS SECTION D-D a 009 SLPC LP 0.01141.412 am... sna.M 0040O E .Lta Lvrm 4- CP Ma arnE .Ero mieM^SS .�.0'?iiFrPr 01.04 PALL -- K .0303I.tm om 0c.(TM) ©IVI4,4 gDFN TYPICAL SECTION 0. auE i ya 4 00070 ro TO STOP SPIT 0 CT. 0.0.0 m 0.0a1a aew.a� STOW 0 10•40 S• `amu a 00 0 no (Cr .J-A THROUGH PARALLEL STORM AND SPRING WATER SWALES rTOP wr. M.q 4.40 .TO 37006T0 R 44-040 P r. 0400 raTEN PPE OMICPER .L,. 0722 STOOrs TM 00111.1 P TREET CRASS SECTION B-B Y a}TM[ SM. =Q.. .am D.Ewrt.e, 431E .m/a 10a mP010 a uE YOIC 0 MO.. /T IbM LnP 10ne U[S TIMM mum Ma - MCP Sw (ELM 240179 � ..10 oa9w 4.rt D'QRt L- PIM ro uuc .s mO 02. 1000 11 aIiI�IWUTSIDE PERIMETER AND UNDER FLOOR SLAB DRAIN TILE COPSE 00 m/m ra ITO UNDER DRAIN �gUTNDDaATIIN DRAIN TILE AROUND OUTSIDE PERIMETER OF BUILDING a TM CP OP t ST.T3 MOP MO 0100 MM +.E 40.45 601C 110 CO 0 roa000.1310 Ern-0 .41 1.00 VMS LD¢UTE 4K0PM 11./101SE 1n MOM MOM n e4P PPL , ua. PME1Rn im TO 0037 011160.10 E.- A N TRUNK LINE CONNECTION oo 0717n.E -- ^t 3Eas nm .4.00 4n 009 00 412E 070 TO P.a.c .OS aron SLOT ..0 [rP TIT l4.PC O4x `034 mre V34101.h W .P .. n MOM uO 01102 .AW. .Rro M sus m > m 1.3201 ®70 ama ©°O00i *1O =4.10 ..r 434 .EM/1E m GAL PARKING LOT CROSS SECTION F-F SO rt u a 003 saEE 003 a Cross 9wE TO mROMb.m ®uM Ptr4D( 9W a ©MMO 4m Q E37.0ME use .EOM _aMOSS SLOT COOP nrr•SLO KE ire snv m in Cross saE Cam,. PPE m W CUM MI 13.1710 90E0 %geoUTREET CROSS SECTION E-E LOP OPMaNn 9/10.0 2, 4.10 TO 90440704 EaT TOTE 004. 001 Mml 001.0 Owiw ro 0 Pea ELME __ a MOa svc a PCss aPE -� - f MO COM 40.100P.m .TM LP E[9[a1.4.0 4101.0E Pw11L m( TO 01110•1131 ..4Er LEVOTLE MY..EO wr1I0 `0MM0407 004 MANTLE ESE TO m rsm .0 Eo m- E a CROSS ELME • raSOIS• C'' ee91u PPE TO m smEr 000 ®oRMTAIN,roC91TAIN AROUND BOTTOM PERIMETER OF WAIL arm Om w. MOW OG .M 271044. . via Eua.L MIMI TO SOO. MP WY 0.01 wms CCTw C0.0.4+1113 ME .SE ITV TOE, ERTYPICAI PIPE�DRAIN BASIN a'a.G 00.0. .11.29.M nOPPE Or LP.° 4A2N0 11004 110 Or w R ® 3 XV Or 43aa li��.+pp/ppaG- Wff ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET 3101 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA SS401 (612)339-3773 FAX(612)336-0060 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNUTES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS BKBM IMan se Ott 10001 oMe P. _ ITT Immo. aft. Eno an .'ae .ti ,.... a n.e.. nOw avaE fip44 m en S9 rr0 ma man N � 131MenP°OM. "mOn m 000.0 PPa am pea me ea ow�maw' m m wn.m .. qE. ma nol oocurom '.1E4 0 per to ay0 SsMnomons ea w . .wr rot M ma a o0.e 02. oro in.. e7ae3 .aoflm sago .o 0 30 60 120 M0 SCALE 1b 30' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIO\ REVISIONS' CIVIL DETAILS DATE. PROJECT P DESIGN DRAWN SHEET P 0221-00 02217 00 TJC SLX CI61 J BUXELL POMO PM 0 0001 n 001-1 II Or se uN 0000 Pao m 00 Pam m 00.940 0 sr zroaor 04.00 ®TYT .PPAFVYDRANT WITH GATE VALVE AND BOX 7 NO 00101 PLAN 90 BEND SECTION A —A PLAN 72 1/2 BEND Fu-nFa TO .O.•Sa w m nno 3.. , PLA\ 45 BEND 1 DI E S DNS TABLE ARE BASED ON W TER PR SSLRE C 150 P 5 AND AN E RT RESIST NCE OF 1 70 PER SCJAF FOC D NENSIONS C C11 SHOULD BE URGE E 0.G1- TO AK AE 0 EOU TO OR ARGER TN 45 3 01.E SON A Al SOULD BE A5 URGE 5 POSS E TOT Dui TITER -ER G TN 11.J BOLTS 9H P OF B 04 OF BUTTRESS V R 5 LEN 5 OUR S W S FR UNDISTURBED EARTH 0055 DIMENSIONS 110 OW Me v ~ STFe 00 1 1 3 3 r r r r -r r r r r ar r r-. 0 -Cr r y -r -a r r r c r-r r r r r TZRA TDCK DETAIL FOR MECHANICAL PIPE BENDS r r FRONT VIEW 11 zif NING FOR DRAINAGE SWALE PROFRE VIEW OF STRUCTUBF ® (IER r roLCCONTROL STRUCTURE #24 MMSf.L PLAN 61130,01 1v {4 aoPo.mOR n3w SECTION A A 75T TURF REINFORCEMENT MATERIAL STABII IZTION ( 1i(PROPOSED Su 00 C RISER ®SFWREANOUT rn 003 r 40 LASS TO M0LS MP CATCH BASIN 1610 00010 733P IS CIF CCM. _ r¢R .PAROH➢ 0 00 MOT 00 00000 000. 0i 'o / • MIER COOLS0. arw oLLr HIOa. 000▪ 1 sc Wall w.0 0701 TO.Sa 3. 5+3740w3 -Cr MO 00101 SOROS ravPIN D .c 00 OP .a .¢v FM. AI MOM 90 1.0401 H SUMP MANHOLE 0110 0001 Ism 1•050101 10 100 N rum w'm JF1L TPipItiSdNEC aRry PNE 0100 FOR IMP a ON -Vs imv 000001110 003, MPT Pet 4440 Hop.- PUFF RFOOPIL M 0000 SOSC 004 CONLF3 Val_ mm �I pE REDOING SECTION ads .au Fa a 0, 001D 300 n:a VI PS 0 FMu�30 rro47 .14 P0I avvS r 1300 en. P am r31 70,770 300. nq RN03 0100eav •AWl SVS .M�FT O 130 MOT05 474 50( 110,0 0 /2 Cr 0 PR 0010 iv[ 00 .001 m.uia 000013 01 IINa.3 0.1 0 00.1 ALL MIPS 00.1034r ro runt PIS 90L ¢ a v w rtYw an..6 a r nw a n.004 n. v004 114eo413 04 LW Pa IVPurt —1 H ANITARY MANHOLE J e.voOAS � 0. O P w¢ ruua use sal 3R 1.1 Pt100141 OF MOIL 0.0.103 10910 s 0LCM3 0707711713 C013.• TO a ;�nN as • 00.s P u 0,110 13,3 10131 030 0001a.T3 006 Po. w��H scO 00. s PLAN SEC , ON PAR A R r1dEP 000 SLCPC MSS Cal. IOC RI CATO, 0031. 4 X 36 SUMP CATCH BASIN_ 000, ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET 0101 MINNEAPOIS MINNESOTA 5S401 (6121336-3773 FAX(612E138-0040 URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMIINIIIES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS Me 001•00/440 BKBM 1 " ..oPm Om _ Mr FR[6Y ob'1100 ewyd a Mu [RN UN 10 001F e. R.a Mars e. MI Fr 000 00 on ea40, 1000 A. ry-- 0 30 60 120 180 SCALE 1 30' NOT FOR CO\STRUCTION REVISIONS; CIVIL DETAILS DATE PROJECTP DESIGit DRAWN. SHEET P 0221 CO 02217.00 TJC C1 7 j 1 BUXELL T1 ES��RM, ATFR TRFATMFNT k PONDING AREAS_ ROna OLr M/ 0RT11TT1EATMF_NT TT RAN GARDEN R28 RP MR PI &LP OP OK aA mntr so 0Itar POP PIrra pregar Ina @r r r (01R ie00ea Nan e vert aMR TKNw rFrfK V PP 10 OWL Da MR Ao-rta Nrd ▪ RMR P PS Sat I Re PP RAN GARDEN R2A RO00 MY Mat. pry RO IP ann A 0fa01 N-iN r-4K N ra0 *pea I OP OP A�(Ojr PO. so a j a m Pa Of Ina ODrart. nalR 110 OW a Mat rat9K N OA o.ra 6n Ar n P fa art CMR RAN GARDEN RIA ar Ats an PATO1 A110) Bros (VP R tap P. r r (O7 0.1 *SO ar TPA N.0 ▪ N xOI KO- TAP N rag n 700 111101 On art MR M Oa MR A art aPra ROMP an AI RAN GARDEN RSA RP MP Pa Mr OUT Oa )@M are APO PPS PPP Porryil Mots OP LOKI r- (aL OYOOt N-ww PLO mMIR sTRNasp (0-71K N r644 Mtr sirla M0. At[[ ro gar 002 TOTS. ROOF AREA 55705 SF (126 ACRES) NORTH THE 114(NT IRAN SUMMARY TOTAL HARD ARE 24 671 Sr (057 ACRES) TOTAL GREEN AR A 12 584 C F. (0 7S ACRES! TOTAL A 112360 Sr (258 ACRES) 0 wI 1 yea 003 CS ape 029 073 nRltr 008 COS span 040 CS 0 a. 1CPa. 476 75 pp 033 CS mats 008 CS TOMS 517 On 0 w 100-Tea 755 CF5 pp 033 CS bats 008 CS spm9 796 CY5 an) R .ARDEN ROA1 Ae M 10 01.4N1 rS Oran RAO 00077 u mam 07 r r (ns) • art n MP a WIT@MR L A all @M A an a Mn RAN GARDEN R3B AO. m art4 T O17 A SC OMtAIL arrow 417. MOSS 00-.0.014 Ta rat Lira P Syr (Pa Ala art .Ent Z. line sb aMa or OR sr R a- K nOR 1 a SEP Inn On SO aMR S at Oa MR. la 0' ROMP ary Al POW) 0.0 UlaA an ay pIv Asa a>, Oil A PPP nits 0020.0 IIOr aiP r (a (Og) Mra ta-ras ESN 10577 raps RR 1 CA AMA FOS 0 SUMM R TOTAL ROOF ARrA 52848 SF ((7 21 ACRES TOTAL 90EWAL2 ARE 21522 SF (0.54 ACRES TOTAL CR"TM AR A TOTAL AREA- 703.377 Sr (237 ACRES) pARKI.G LOT TREATMENT AREAS ROMP an Az RAN GARDEN NPA b aro Al art OUR O(a Ala (IP ea Al 11.011 M0R rear a@ UTl ✓ Ave (O11 I-3R NN a-TK N 1v A1N AVM MR Os PR Oa 01 Mn of TK NMaw sa ea OS Are Da OO MR, v:(O ROMP GP Al RAM GARDEN NP8 ra arr m OL4 Ole A(a RSV ion I ( 1 I LEVl 0 - -(050 TK Nam 1 An 1 r0- KNW e1rrtK N MA a 00 OS MILER a0100061 OS Mn 0 Om1M 602 OS M0. CO Or ROMP WV At RAM GARDEN SPA wan >s OLP Os an nun VT MY 101 PM Pan 70e0 ma SOP Mtn r r. IPA) PR Nsin/ Aso AIL Os AMOR o-rtK N.0 • O]Iei OR OS MR 00-100. otr Om OR Art OR OS M0. O Ca fair 00011:70 aft, Al RAN G RDEN SP8 A• SP A\ an OP an Asa Oran AS RPM MS I Saar PSI r..(WSJ / MP KM 7030 ASP 00 VOID! ar OS PPE 000 MOOR I0)-TAR N Tan 101 Ora.. Pe 6@T,MR. PARKING L.TS TREATMENT SUMMARY TOTAL PAVER ARE 32 77 Sr (anACRES) 230 SF TOTAL GREEN AFAAG N 17 (000 AOCRESI ACRES) TOTAL APEA 3600. 5F (0.82 ACRES) 0 out 7 7e0/ 000 CS pip 006 CS pFAs . 006 CS 0 out 10-Jeg 247 CS pa 0.08 CS MEAD 249 COS 0 out 100-2ev 187 J57P2 0OB CFS rat, 195 CF5 ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET 1101 MINNEMOUS MINNESOTA 55402 (612036 3773 FAX (612036-0040 URBAN PLANNING OPEPPSPACE COMMUNITIES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS BID) Qmru►-.on Pam TM Saba> OROSYSOcs pat w wl_ PO. CL rya say attar Lit tnarpsy :a rav b s Pane sagsppespen ara span. so al pi roa rot pear PPP Os spa. =Prop meat pi PPrem ter lmnvt m y •Rre1 ansp +0-*PPP 0 .a0.p 0 JO 60 120 760 SCALE I 30' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVIBIONSI STORM WATER TREATMENT & PONDING AREAS DATE. PROJECT t DESIGN DRAWN. SHEET t CI 8; YO- WATERSHED DATA SHEET 10' PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOIS SETS CR UNE — — PFOPERTY E — — — PROPOSED 009708R — — SPOT 0.05 RCM SWRN SEMA > > CATOI RASP/MANHOLE • ■ SILT RCP /D10E 8 RRV c0957Rucn0N WASHINGTON COUNTY RELEVANT 24-HIT STORM EVENTS USED FOR DESIGN TUTOR W UM' EWNT YEAR 0-YEAR PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOIS PROPERTY LOO — - - PROPOSED °AMUR SPOT DEV RCM STONL WWI CATCH RAS ATANNTAE • ■ PARED 00 SECTION • EPA0ACE RO ARROR — SILT TI0R wax SA*N1 RATE (04R00.) Tr EI7571NG DRAINAGE AREAS ABBREVIATIONS 087 O Mq M 4wd T... ▪ OM0 Pu. n�E MTn. ▪ 0.01 4101 000 '.�.fl 1...0. 0 rr.. DA Team TOTAL YmER40U5 ( 07ES) TOTAL P07M07 (ACRES) TOTAL ( cars) ENTIRE L75Sn G STE A08 185 703 TOTAL 08 385 793 FI8ST)NO STORM WATER RUN(YF 8IMMARY 0 out 1 I9Or 11 99 EFS 0.19 CFS wino 1218 CFS 0 out 10 tear - 20000 CFS 0.19 65 spn9s 2819 LYS 0 Out. 100 rm. 44 59 LYS + 019 L75 >a 4.97 44 78 175 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA DESCRIPTIONS QRAINAGE AREA I AMMENITY POND AND IRRIGATION DETENTION QRAINAGE AREA 2 - NORTH TREATMENT TRAIN THROUGH RAIN GARDENS QRAINAGE AREA j - STREETS AND PARKING LOTS TREATED TFIROU..H DRAINFSELD RAIN GARDENS AND PERMEABLE PAVERS QRAINAGE AREA 4 - STREETS TREATED THROUGH RAIN GARDEN QRAINAGE AREAS UNCONTROLLED FLOW OFF -SITE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS J BUXELL ARCHITECTURE LTD 129 NORTH SECOND STREET PT01 MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 5540t (612121313-3773 FAX (6121336 0040 IMPERVIOUS (ACRES) PERVIOUS (ACRES) TOTAL (ACRES) 0 out (CFS) st Tm ueOt 2 00 2 40 4 15 5.90 DRAINAGE AREA 1 1 75 062 237 000 026 159 340 DRAINAGE AREA 2 088 0 87 1 75 0 74 0 29 3 45 8 35 DRAINAGE AREA 3 2 35 037 2 72 036 0 36 719 17 33 DRAINAGE AREA 4 0 36 0 33 0 69 0 02 0 05 0 65 0 92 DRAINAGE AREA 5 0 18 0 34 0 40 0 23 0 40 I J4 2 44 70747. 5 29 2 64 7 93 0 75 1 36 14 22 32 44 DISTURBED AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 7 93 ACRES URBAN PLANNING OPENSPACE COMMUNITIES ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GRAPHICS r.a.w0004011 ti"® nae. P em.IMOu . 04 en r A no. .. 0.0 Al 000.n TN. 0 Gem 01- moue .0000 > mm 0TA40 000 04 .0 to nmr.. 120 180 SCALE 1 311 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV ION WATERSHED DATA SHEET DATE. PROJECT" DESIGN DRAWN SHEET" 0221m 02217m TJC SLK Cl 9 3, r ;PH "g aLlit TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 4 sl ILO 4 Id r_ 0' Q TI 1 J � f � I -!1 L. I 1 1 .�- I , ,--,.-- _ 1 1 - i !_, _,f TF...., I t 1 I��.,,„ ,, i — -- I '-1 0 1 I - I J_ 1 4 i `' _ L TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 1 q r Q a uritl!lIuIr11111ll[l11ll L=-= 11:___=I. _- i %I 1111 II" i I, 1'12/ Ili I 7 I 1 wargitg AIM I�ii a 11 1 4 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 1 o .3% 1 1 cP 9 1 0 4 _, 1-. r 1 I I 1 1 . -_1 I _ 1 1 - 11 I , 1. - J / ' J 1 1 L I y 1 ' I - I _ -._r - , I i 1-1. I 7, I__ _I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I _I r I � 1� ! 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I ' - t I i j 1-_ I i _ { LI-I _ d--+. - 1 1 1 1 f- 1 I I 1, 1 r r i I 1 1-- 1 I I ! 11 I 11 ... - 1 l 1 I'I - - 1 1 1 -1 -I -_ 1- } ' I- I 1 1 1_ , 1 1 11 1 r- 1 I 1()1 I '?ia,-SS-A 1 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN I I I I 1 1 d 1 1- 1 =,____ f I 4 C ii3 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN II ' I I I 1 'r I v I 1 1 0 I c I t I I1 1 I I— I 1— I 1 1 1 I — 1 a gta 5 L , I VI 1 4 l" I .A I 1 r Y 1 a —1 I e. ts I I t I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 1— ; Z 1' 4 r Z 4.4.!I 711r1 \Y 1. �� S%"N F t n rt r III › aTERRASPRINGS zipl L sp NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN ^" ii i J BfXRE LPL ,29 .101 1 I 1 1 4- a l+ 1 I 'a. 1 1 1 1 I l 1 I i 1 11 I I 1 — s+� J 1 1 1 4- + 1 1 1 - t 11 1 1 i l 1 1 1 I 1 1 5 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN P I !3' 1 1' 1 11YY M "4N,Yr' 1 r ntl r 'CJ CJ7'111rvra I I rmt r - ,1+*durxmn+neprrnrrrr+a-¢ m11wnj g 'Mt - rmn re *71 rinr+ aril f v r1 ri r 11 • s n .dkiv*4 f rr r -J r 1 1 ^yf — �J (� I J I nTXVi'V't ,› r 4 ti r4 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN NF t I_ I I I I I i I I I ++I I t 1 1 1, I 1 I 1 1 I i I I I I I I I. { I I I 1 II I t I _I I I l t 4 1 � I f I I I _I I I l 1 • I '' r I I r rI Iv- 1 I '1 J N I 1 p r { ' I 1 t I 1 I t t I t I I I t I � I I TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN glort;1] I t-. 4 1`f 1 �O g J. t t11 ; 1 4 1 1 .1' 1 1 1 1 1 --- - 4 -�, I 1t I - 1 I I _ ' I I I 1 I 1 1 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN S ► itEET STILLWATER, MINN I , t f I I 1-' — _ I i I +' I I { i , 1 I I I _ L'_I _I I, - 1 II C I I_ ,— _I I— 1 I I I 1 — —s — 1 r —y I --I-I 1 - I_ _ ' I I - - 1 '1 — I { , 1- I I I a 1 L I�I, r 1'- I I r I TI'— a 1_ - - I I , —- I" 1 — 1 r _I I 1—I r I I I 1 — ttr ,I a I I I - -1- I r- 1 - I ' 1 , i I I 1 I' 1 1 I r I 1 CP 1 a• ' 13 I I ' 1 I I C —SS—% it 1 ti J TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN r r K r r 1 -i '1 I I 1 - I 1 ral 1� 1 1 I 1 L. irtk 1 f _ _ 4- i Y TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN I I I I 1 1 I '_ 1 I I _I I , ' , I I I , I 1 4 1I-r i_ r I t I ' I 1 _ -I r L r 11 ' I , L I I - 1 _ I 1 1 1 ni I --i t ' gos ' 1 .. -► - -I r 1-01 IS r - - 1 SR.'ia_!t _0 ' - I 4' 1 1 ` 4 a I I 11 ' I ' I 1 , 11 I f� T11 I 1 1 _1 111I t I 1 I I 'I I - r- I 1 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 511 51100 Z 4 r 7 II!IIIII11 111 Ili!I�lilli �, � �,tsiaG�_I �I rY .I�J�f IEIA - i 1���1 III—IJ I r L���I��►i'� 911i1114�"c �i1•I�1I .,,I: u1 ilfl I 1iu �:arn►s :`p,ll"'�'�1 1:411,III I III i a I7I k�0 u i- 11..litii�i11a�.�u-� `II�V�I 44, ^ ^ �, r ., F39srn r{ TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 5 5r CA 5m 1 I ' e' Zi —, 1 1 J 1 - 1 1 r • I , I 1 a 4 1' 4- I i r 1 1 1 � 11 r I-1 II IJ- 1 I-- J 1 eafe r - 1 1 1 t I _ II i 4- } 1 I ' II I 1 1 11 I 11 1 i 1 t 1 _ 1 I I I i 1 I I I" I 1 I I I' I 1 i I 1 1 I 1 ' , 1 I 11 I , 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I i 11' I.I 11 I II I - ' , I I r 1- II t Ii 1 I i -I I j 1 1 - 1. Ii I I 1 I r 1 I I 1 1 i I r 1 I."{ ..-.i t I , 1 1 1 I I __I 1 I 1- 1 1 —1 i + 1 I _ �_ I t Ir —, TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN co c i , r7 ph 1 IJ ma.a.rwm L -* rs1TR fl vr.r.RCI G,TZr1."FRI rrnmr4Tsr-ru rend-Ls-rr tra,serrranrrrriR194rrrorywrl rrorufx rt.If] rnfn -4 1Rr a'r (T r -r 1 ^' ,tnrrlr Ur 1A 1 •• rt.% Mara+1 fFrrrfr rwririvrAnwrri (aa Et�Y }�y( s 1 r ri r!. frir�S ru� ')Ii44' ,+'t7 a45i'rsr fis P1 ry a l3lr`44 a k.�` i��(1'�axf��lY.il6iri �dh��+ r�'',y�Y�s•'A'�� •' I i ' I 1 �> te_ /1�_ tr is r.41, TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN 1'I �— 1-1 i r i 1 I 1 I , ! • I ., I I 1 I —1 1 I — — I .1) I r 1— � t l I F I 1 i I I I ^ 1 , _ _1 J. i — t 1 ri T r , I 1L i J I 0 ! - 1 I I I I L I,'I I ' I e I I L I I I r t I a 1 g1 I t _ '-.t t i i II -r _ I 5 _1 I 1 I ' I , 1 f , I I 1 I I I + J , I —51 —I.I-- 4. -J r- 1 l 1— , — I { i , i_ • I 1 1 —I I t r 1 I— I L , I 1,11 111I 11I I _ I I I f I ' 1 t I I i I, I I _ ' 1 04.4 TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINN I I I 1 ' i I Ir I 1 I 1 , 1 I t .jti s..., ; 1 — '-r 1 r --I _ —I r- l 1 • A I I —1 } I- • I I— t_... 1. 1. 1. _1. 1 ! I 1, r - �_'�!�_�, 1 - —r t I - I • 1 I 1 a� I II ft 1 1 I - --• I i 1 t I I t • I ' i I11 A I 1 - T • 1- • 1 1 1 • i I I t • • I• , _ I — I I k 1 1 II — I -+ 4 I 1 ! 1 11 r TERRASPRINGS NORTH MAIN S i MET STILLWATER, MINN /,J r PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SV/03-01 Planning Commission Date Apnl 14, 2003 Project Location Unimproved portion of Meadowlark Dnve (south of McKusick Lake) from Center Street to extended unimproved North Sherbume Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning Distract RB Applicants Name Tony Mutter Type of Application Street Vacation Project Descnption A street vacation request for an unimproved area of Meadowlark Drive (south of McKusick Lake) from Center Street to extended unimproved North Sherburne Street Discussion The request is to vacate an ummproved portion of unimproved Meadowlark Dnve Attached is a letter from the City Engineer that states nght of ways and easements should be preserved for vanous reasons Recommendation Denial of request Attachments Application Form/Letter/Map 5 v/D3_a/ i1Mter THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PETITION TO VACATE PUBLIC STREET The undersigned hereby petition that all that portion of _ Ova% 2/2/12/ad A Pte abutting Lots ,) 3l 13) I LI �//2'5 Name cf (/ f // , Block /4/ Addition, in the City of Stillwater, hereby be vacated Address //v 4Vabt)h/-1 ,6'/!' //4 ' ftadb/A)Jaci /e ell -53"eer2AY S 7-1,7L *Attach a map showing the street to be vacated Fee $100 Receipt No CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 I i Reason for Wanting to Vacate Meadowlark Drive The present homeowners of 1104 Meadowlark Dnve and 503 North Center Street are proposing the city of Stillwater vacate Meadowlark Dnve, for the reasons of • Meadowlark Drive has been used as a dump site for many years and due to this the natural beauty of the ravine is being overlooked • There is a sewer pipe that runs under Meadowlark Dnve, that pipe only services one house, 1104, the present and future homeowner's do not foresee any problems with giving the city clearance to maintain that pipe or any other future maintenance of underground utilities that my come about • Both houses (1104 Meadowlark Drive and 503 N Center Street) are presently using an easement from the city, in order to enter their properties via the non -vacated part of Meadowlark Dnve 1 MEMORANDUM To Steve Russell From Klayton Eckles y-1. Date Apnl 8, 2003 Subject Requests for Vacation of Meadowlark Dnve and N Sherburne Street DISCUSSION The Planning Commission has received a request for a street vacation on Meadowlark Dnve and N Sherburne Street As an overall practice Public Works and Engmeenng recommend that we take a strategy of trying to preserve nght-of-way and easements whenever possible Right-of-ways are used for street construction and in addition provide areas for public utilities and stormwater conveyance and management systems Finally they provide valuable sidewalk and pedestnan routes throughout our town The particular request proposed would give up a large portion of right-of-way in the immediate vicinity of McKusick Lake This nght-of-way may have important future benefits for access to the area around the lake including meeting the objectives of the comprehensive trail plan RECOMMENDATION The Engineenng and Public Works Department recommends denial of the vacation request, with the exception of perhaps the vacation of that portion of nght-of-way where the home encroaches R2I W R2OW RI9W T32N T3IN T3ON T29N T28N T27N R22W R21 W R2OW T32N T3 I N T3ON T29N T28N T27N Vicinity Map N 0 100 Scale in Feet Thh drawl 9 Is the ream of compllaro and reproduction of land records s Slay appear In various Wa 1dr9ton County Mee The drawing ahonld be used far reference purposes ordy Washington County b not responsible for any Inaccuracies Source WaehIngto County Survayees Office Phone (651) 4304875 Parcel data based o A8400 informatia anent tluougfr: Janis ry 31 2003 Map prated March 25, 2003 R.OWAO0 2A0ELEIR PER 002 2 P01Q= P° 01 a OCK'$ SECOND AIEDITIIN I m >w P O TI L�VA e 000 a 1 TER` a10 all 12 P ,P Pn 14 P4 0 V— .. 9 C m 4 v� 20 � I •„4 i 2 P'y 11. 21 P 0* 0 22 14 m 7 15 K 0 118 4 3 Pa 17 le 19 Be.. WEST to in U • MAPLE m ■.,. a9 - 2 1 • 21 i PO Gtwaetnren RA OF MOO AOy LAKE MCKUSICK . AI PHOTn a SENNDNRDN OF WATERS Gt 2021 ,pl•• AM PAmptn a PROTECTED WETLAND AREA 82-20W 220 13 91 4. SM'03- 2 b S ro 12 a A P, 10 J Im' PPS 9 0 ARK Pu STREET VACATED PER OrtY RESOLUTION 4/511904 20 a 10 17 10 t10 14 Pa 13 a 12 ae 1 1, , 4k39a 2 P. MU n0 PLAYGROUND 09 a Location Map OLDG A • -cam e 2 10 r0 .1 ! 2 I a 15 e 5 N w D re w S 00 9 e a's, 1 •,y 6 1-4 1 10 ray mew + x 02+ • a I,4 TA i q t1 0 9 b+ a e0 2 P4 4 a i.0 PTM MA 10 20 4 3 5 a a 420, 10 a0 • RAW 2 W R19W R_W RIW R'OW Vicinity Map 0 198 Scale in Feet nary no44 -- ssrem.:rbe.m..P. n:....w..�w�t* s..y 4m. IswrIs 0*04 .4 P.... s41 w..y.OMq wd eb.v w44..y.04.P y..p1e4. 0010 ,0007 P.b04 00 6.0.OtlP011. P4..4..1..4.7 u.P.s. 10.1.1 mm 4 b PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SV/03-02 Planning Commission Date Apnl 14, 2003 Project Location Ummproved portion of North Sherburne Street to Ummproved Meadowlark Drive Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name Tony Mutter Type of Application Street Vacation Project Descnption A street vacation request for an unimproved area of North Sherburne Street Discussion The request is to vacate an ununproved portion of North Sherburne Street Attached is a letter from the City Engineer that states nght of ways and easements should be preserved for various reasons He goes on to suggest that a portion of the nght of way be vacated where home encroaches Recommendation Denial of request — Approval of a portion of nght of way to be vacated where home encroaches Condition of Approval 1 A legal survey shall be submitted to engineenng showing area house addition encroaches nght of way Attachments Application Form/Letter/Map f sv/o3 -oa• 4 THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PETITION TO VACATE PUBLIC STREET The undersigned hereby petition that all that portion of /1/DrM Shrorkfiwe .�rPP/- abutting Lots 6 c , 3) /. q j 2 Block /3 /2/ ,5Q /hS Addition, in the City of Stillwater, hereby be vacated Name Address %%2di'1niS n i ,//(K- //,/AQ�/w/¢v/_ 4v cn �mt !m�c/D VS Siff A/Drf/ /4}8 S6-6/- &Weer) i fdi. "1 1,4e1Difdeli-Z- "6/7-e *Attach a map showing the street to be vacated Fee $100 Receipt No CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 • • • Reason for Wanting to Vacate North Sherburne Street The home abutting North Sherburne Street is 1104 Meadowlark Dnve, which back m the 70's built an addition to their home, which actually was partially built on Sherburne Street, with supposedly only a handshake for an agreement between the homeowner and the city of Stillwater Now in order to avoid possible future conflicts between the present and future homeowners of 1104 Meadowlark Dnve, we would like to petition to have part of North Sherburne Street vacated, per attached map R21W R2OW RI9W T32N T3 IN T3ON T29N T28N T27N R22W R21 W R2OW Vicinity Map 100 Scale In Feet This drawing b the muq of compilation and reprmlrtlm of bn0 records as bey appear In v.rbu. Washington County offices The drawing should be used for r to nt:s purpose or.. Washington County b not *appestbts to tiny naocuredes Source Wasbngton Canty Stamp% 011c. Phone (651) 43o4a7s Puul data based an AS400 nfomuSo aces 0nugs Amery 01 2003 Map pined March 25. 2033 r MEMORANDUM To Steve Russell From Klayton Eckles jl.-►% Date Apnl 8, 2003 Subject Requests for Vacation of Meadowlark Drive and N Sherburne Street DISCUSSION The Planmng Commission has received a request for a street vacation on Meadowlark Dnve and N Sherburne Street As an overall practice Public Works and Engmeenng recommend that we take a strategy of trying to preserve nght-of-way and easements whenever possible Right-of-ways are used for street construction and m addition provide areas for public utilities and stormwater conveyance and management systems Finally they provide valuable sidewalk and pedestnan routes throughout our town The particular request proposed would give up a large portion of nght-of-way in the immediate vicinity of McKusick Lake This nght-of-way may have important future benefits for access to the area around the lake includmg meeting the objectives of the comprehensive trail plan IN RECOMMENDATION - The Engmeenng and Public Works Department recommends denial of the vacation request, with the exception of perhaps the vacation of that portion of nght-of-way where the home encroaches PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-28 Planning Commission Date April 14, 2003 Project Location 308 North Third Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Jim Kent and Lee Thompson Kent Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (30' required, 10'6" requested) for the construction of an addition to the existing residence Discussion The proposal is for a Variance to the front yard setback to construct an addition to the top floor of the house The house is setback from the front property line 10'6" instead of the required 30 An addition to the height of the house is adding more mass structure in the 10'6" setback Also, the zoning ordinance for this district does not permit three (3) stories in a private residential dwelling, two and one half (2 '/2) stories is the maximum stories permitted, that would mean two (2) stories and a attic or attic space Recommendation Denial — the zoning ordinance allows for a maximum of 2 1/2 stories Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggests the following conditions of approval 1 The style, color and materials shall be the same as the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings/Photos PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No FEES Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 X Vanance $70/200 Resubdivision $100 Subdivision* $100+50/1 c Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Planning Unit Development * $500 Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with appl:cat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If apphcat►on is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete appbcat►on or supporting material will delay appl,cat►on process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 3og Nov+c, 3�z SfrJ Zoning District -R3 Description of Project Assessor's Parcel No,- 6 36 d 61 3 /a-?' A-+,o^ r (GEO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, ►reformation and evidence submitted herewith in respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify l_will comply' the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner -L, Lea- K ..,t Mailing Address 1$ N City - State - Zip S' 11.-t Q,,, j Ht.) 55081 Telephone No 43o - o 5 4 Z Signature Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature (SI'gnature is required) (Signature is required) Jinn r�IS 311 - b53(s9 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x ►�o Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal 22, $ Accessory i 4 Total Building floor area square feet Existing I2-ov square feet Proposed 1650 square feet Paved Impervious Area il4 square feet No of off-street parking spaces z H Mcnamaralsheila\PLANApp FRM Apnl 12 2002 no ean/p d caw .�a eeeen.e pies as mortis try Mae ..a. Carry cam The Own. aloha e. Wedbrr..e -ew w Inman* v.nti- Sew* wssp.meq ems. was P.m Asa r.aum v.si eoern s •9.oa eissue eon. a.epre..Sy NCO Yap e...a We. A MD Application for Variance for 308 North 3rd Street Owners Jim Kent and Lee Thompson Kent We are the current owner residents at the property Our project goal is to add a 3rd bedroom to the house, creating a bedroom of what is currently the attic, and to remodel the main bathroom We understand that because our house does not have adequate setback that we are required to submit an application for variance so that we can eventually receive a permit to build This house is currently 2-bedroom Most, if not all the houses in this section of town are 3-bedroom homes We would like to expand the house for our family without having to move Our plan is to turn the unused space that is currently the attic, into a master bedroom This will require changes to the roofline as documented in the materials It will raise the existing roofline by 4-5 feet, maintaining the aesthetic quality of the current structure The new roofline will be at approximately 33 feet, which should keep us below the maximum of 35 ft that we believe is the limit in residential Stillwater A new stair will be built from the 2nd floor to the new 3rd floor The second floor will be renovated but will stay essentially the same The current plan keeps the footprint of the house the same and maintain the landscape of the home, including several trees that have been in place for approximately 20 years We have explored other alternatives to this project, including increasing the footprint of the home, by expanding to the north, as this would keep the roofline the same Initial estimates show this to be cost prohibitive There is also an easement (9) That prevents us from building within 20 feet of the property line on the north side of the property Survey Stake 3ft } 13ft Garage ma 78ft Carriage House from the Aurora Staples Inn 182 ft I Sunken Yard I11R Deck 113 ft 308 North 3rd Street 127 ft 10-6 Front Walk I12R i 127 R I170ft 8R r a �cv c > =/'" M ti a.110 R p... Linden Healthcare Facility Survey Stake Retaining Wall 3 ft (from edge of sidewalk to Top of Wall) 10ft 12 R 172 ft 78 ft Sidewalk Curb Centerline of 3rd Street North Site Plan for 308 North 3rd Street • V S c oi4 p 0 1/61 tr. 6! !— 4 T7=RV low STOP. T kI (I WLC. 1 M �EIIP`QoM _ l brrrx wit(' f l(l P Y Loo ms r l.-A 1,1 4 Y8" i'- pi, SIH t I A s ❑ MINNEAPOLIS 43 Ma n Street SE 11410 M nneapol s MN 55414 TEL (6121 379 3037 FAX (6121379-0001 EXCELSIOR 440 Second Street Eacektor MN 55331 TEL 19521380-48I7 FAX 19521380-4818 ❑ STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street St Ilwater MN 55082 TEL 16511351-0961 FAX 16511 35T 7327 www SALAarc corn KEN f-E 1 'E-NcE: - 6CH 1:NiE Z. w AA 5.ASI ELEN A`f 1orl Ilej / I r- bar 7 .-.-A `ENT I,.E:t, f��;\1 i R LI j4Yvf [ I_1iJv I 1 1 L 1 4 i ii „ ,E,—; I — 7 a .A. . ^..... Nogfl4 E LtiI?T Ror1 'it "- 1 -oi �Lktjr. SIHIR A h MINNEAPOLIS ❑ 43 Mato Street SE 8410 M nneapol s MN 55414 TEL (6121 379 3037 FAX (6121 379-0001 EXCELSIOR 440 Second Street f celsux MN 55331 TEL (9521 380-4817 FAX (9521 380-4818 STILLWATER ❑ 904 South Fourth Street St Ilwater MN 55082 TEL (6511351-0961 FAX (6511 35T 7327 www SALAarc com VVET E LEVt\Tiorl I`-o" K EAN.1 g,.L IG�NLE SR 1BL ❑ MINNEAPOLIS 43 Man Sheet SE 1410 M nneapoln MN 55414 TEL (612) 379 3037 FAX (6121379-0001 EXCELSIOR 440 Second Street E celaor MN 55331 TEL 19521380-4817 FAX (9521 380-4818 ❑ STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street SI Ilwater MN 55082 TEL 16511351 0961 FAX (651135T 7327 www SALAarc com SOUTH E. ENNT-101.1 ic,,Lisx10 C {tv& - S L1--rEM s j.1oIJVA3-13 1SV3 0 7% Nlo IJ V A 313 0 7 '1 i -I 41- 1:1! f LT1 z,- N o m o = '°2_ v r g W; g 3 A > g.T g a Z !F47 Oil 111 i! 11 KENT RESIDENCE EXISTING CONTITIONS r. 'P -_[f Ti""4p v 0 EOM IMP m E IV 6- s, PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-29 Planning Commission Date April 14, 2003 Project Location 504 South Greeley Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Ryan and Mya Williams Type of Application Vanance Project Description A Vanance to the front yard (30 feet required, 23 feet requested and rear yard (25 feet required, 14 feet requested) setbacks for the construction of a two -car garage Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to the front and rear yard setbacks to construct a two -car garage The existing garage is 16 feet by 21 feet, not large enough for their vehicle This garage would be converted into living or storage space The garage doors will have to be removed and a three-foot door shall be installed The existing house on a corner lot and has been constructed 23 feet from the property line The front of the garage would continue at 23 feet from the property line The proposed garage would extend 11 feet into the rear yard setback of 25 feet Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The style, materials and color of the garage shall match the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a vanance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings • PLANNING ADMINISTRATION AP Case No PLICATION FORM Date Filed /07k/ Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED FEE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/2 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET . Resunce $70/2 STILLWATER, MN 55082 Resubdivision $100 Subdivision* $1004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Planning Unit Development * $500 Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The appl,cant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting mat( submitted in connection with any application All supporting submitted with appl,cat,on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen, (16) copies of supporting material Is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copses supporting maternal is required A site plan is required with applicat,ons Any incomplete application or supporting material will c application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project r-EZoning District - S€ P� Description of Project Assessor's Parcel No JuVNk•023 C prQ�G T pN�1 -ha� (GEO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewi1 respects, to the best of my knowledge and bebef, to be true and correct I f her certify I will com the permit if it is granted and used " e. N lt---1 t LL, p„^As s tot y01- w , Uu -.SjLL.. (0s l 3Z) Si2 Mailing AddressS4- City -State -Zip S,(IL(Ipet r_ til S Z Telephone No S— (IDS-6 Property Owner Signature e Is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x _ Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Pnncipal a, Accessory Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Cj yO Total Building floor area square fE Existing 0.3 L10 square feet Proposed (00($quare feet Paved Impervious Area 759 square feet No of off-street parking spaces / H lmcnamaralshela'PLANAPP FRM April 12 2002 504 South Greeley Street Sti)Mrater NBI55082 Fnday, March 28, 2003 City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth St Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear City of Stillwater, I am writing this letter to gam permission to build an addition onto our residence at 504 S Greeley St. The addition would consist of a two car garage (24' X 25'), as our vehicle will not fit mto our existing garage We have enough square footage withm our lot and we would be m accordance with Historic Stillwater setbacks The addition would be built by professionals m an aesthetically pleasing manor to blend m with the elegant neighborhood. My wife and I have discussed this idea with the majonty of our neighbors and they are very supportive of our plans and I hope the aty of Stillwater will be as well I appreciate your time and concern. I have enclosed a rough sketch of what the addition would look hke laid out from a top view Please contact me at your earliest convernence to estabhsh the next step Sincerely, (4 L.-D-V-g--- Ryaa iilliams Phone (651) 275-4050 Apr 02 03 03 21p Ryan M Williams 651-275-0759 P 2 41 L ' \ 1 QOB� }- � � �! �i , ' ��-- - - --- -_- - - _ I 1. 1 -=_--_ _ ,— __co , ,-- ,--1 f _ET , _FPE t�y„1�-/� AMBIGUOUS R OFFICIAL LEGAL 1878 DE t i ` e M_ l0 —CITE ,,,_ f l`N. P ` : _ - ' t i , 1 I' , - 3 ___, '- -+ ( 1 126 \ 0 '' , - -±11 1 1 I„kpp.'hL� It - _ _ _ _, - -_- I , .(0 , 83) ; 1 U0 . i _1_ __ ___ _ __ ` 5I J__ r___ '- --_u, '- _ ___ , - Uri) ,_, -___126 r- _ ` ,7 , ` / t `�,126 I t `� / l ./ ( I-- 1, ICth i , I 1 40086)1 (_o ^ ' Location Map 1 47L2 ' ICIW 0.4Y MOM RSW 0.IW RIM vdnity Map 27 Scale in Feat tro . wow.— GloGOWCWOrow, -me _- Gs OnwrillwriwG ...,. ...r taw la RI n...r. ram• aft4.. s___m.m Maw..... wr.rawq�ma. m.w mrrwrwr ..r.r.w wrpm adr .a .o.rrwrmomr Isom w.xr..owir Iswpf• wm.m laean Oft. Oft war rori 1021 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-30 Planning Commission Date April 14, 2003 Project Location 712 Third Street South Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Kris and Bruce Amundson Gritters Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the rear and side setbacks (5 feet required, 3 feet requested) for the construction of a garage (Revised from applicant's letter and drawings) - Discussion The request is for a Variance to the rear and side yard setbacks for the construction of a two -car garage The applicants' are proposing to replace an existing 18 foot by 20 foot deteriorated garage with a 24 foot by 26 foot garage utilizing similar side and rear setbacks The existing garage is 2' 3" from the property line, the proposed garage would be 3' 1" from the property line The new garage will similar in style to the house, with a modified hip roof, a gable dormer to match the dormers on the house It will have narrow lap siding and wood garage doors to match the architectural style of the house The garage will have a small storage above the garage In the attached letter, the applicants state a number of reasons they are requesting a variance 1 They live on Third Street South, a busy street They want to provide a turnaround area so they can drive out on to the street, rather than backing out 2 There are established trees that restrict building area 3 They have a shared driveway Moving the drive would be difficult 4 There is an existing garden shed that would be difficult to move Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The style, materials and color of the garage shall be similar to the main structure Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings Kris and Bruce Amundson Graters 712 Third Street South Stillwater, MN 55082 651-342-0302 home / 612-342-0172 work March 28, 2003 Planning Commission Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Setback Vanance for 712 Third Street South Dear Commissioners We are wnting to request that you consider granting a vanance to the side and rear setback requirements in connection with our plans to replace the existing detenorated garage on our property with a larger garage Due to the unique charactenstics limiting our site, we are proposing to locate the new garage utilizing side and rear setbacks of 3 feet 1 inch (slightly greater than the existing garage side and rear setbacks of 2 feet 3 inches ) Descnption of Project The new garage will have a positive visual impact on the area The existing 20 feet by 18 feet garage is sagging, the concrete floor is crumbling and missing in some areas, suffers from dry rot from the ground up to 3-4 feet, apparently has had raccoons occupying the eaves at some point, and has been through at least one fire The new garage we hope to build -will be styled and colored to match the house, with a modified hip roof, a gable dormer to match the dormers on the house, and will have narrow lap wood siding and wood garage doors to match the house architectural style The garage needs to be larger to accommodate two vehicles, lawn and garden power equipment, snowblowers, icehouses, bikes, baby joggers and other misc items Initially, we hoped to build a 28 feet by 28 feet detached garage, but soon realized that site limitations, even with variances, would not accommodate that size We have reduced the garage size to 26 feet by 26 feet, which will allow for better vehicle maneuvering as well as some ground floor storage/workspace We also intend to construct a small storage area above the garage The interior of the garage will not be finished, nor will utilities other than electricity be present In other words, we do not intend to make the space "habitable " 712 Third Street South Page 2 March 28, 2003 Issues In order to construct the reduced -size garage on our property in the most effective manner to maximize the utilization of the recreation space and to minimize the paved area necessary to reach the garage, it is necessary to locate the garage as close to the shared dnve line and the rear lot line as possible Although it would be feasible to locate the new garage closer to the lines than the existing garage, the proposed location would sufficiently minimize the negative impacts on the use of our property, while improving upon the existing setbacks such that there will be no greater negative impact than presently exists As a side matter, we also have an 18 feet by 12 feet garden shed/playhouse with similar architectural style as the house built many years ago (but in great shape) that is over the allowable 120 square foot second accessory structure limit We do not plan to do anything to this structure, but would like any granted variance to reflect that the continued existence of the shed is allowed Special Circumstances Supporting Request There are special circumstances relating solely to our property that support our request, including natural amenities, established access points, and existing buildings that restrict the location of the proposed garage 1 Third Street South For safety reasons, there is a need to provide a turnaround area so that it is possible to dnve onto the street rather than backing out, as is currently required Existing trees and shrubs limit the turnaround area Also, traffic and noise restncts the useable family outdoor recreation area to the rear yard, so the natural desire is to minunize paving and to maximize grass area available for recreation for our toddler 2 Established trees and planting beds restrict the approach and turnaround area to approximately 13 feet assuming the current setbacks are followed 13 feet is well below the minimum 20-25 feet turnaround area normally required by design cntena and will require "jockeying" to get turned around Any further enforced setbacks will further shank this already substandard but vital area 3 Established access to the detached garage is via a recorded shared dnve easement on the south lot line No other practical access point to the rear of the property exists Moving the garage over from the side lot line to enforce side setback requirements runs contrary to the intent of the shared access— mimmizing paving to access the garages serving the two properties 4 The existing garden shed further limits our ability to shift the garage from the side lot line Such a shift would not only require more paving, but also would render the current flower garden space between the garage and shed unusable With existing side setback of 2 feet 3 inches, the space would be approximately 12 feet wide Anything much less than that would be too shaded and cave -like to be of any use 712 Third Street South Page 3 March 28, 2003 We are excited about the prospect of replacmg the existing run-down garage with a thoughtful, useful, and attractive structure designed to blend with our house and the neighborhood In order to maximize our return on this significant mvestment, we respectfully request that you grant the requested vanances Sincerely, s and B ce - undsoGntters F PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 $50120C $70/200 $100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500+5( ._Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The appl,cant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting submitted in connection with any apphcat,on All supportinghes mates submitted with appl�cation becomes the property material (i a ,photos, sketches, etc J ies of supporting material Is required If apply anon issubmitted o the City Council, the City of Stillwater en (12) copies supporting material is required P c A site plan is required with appbcat,ons Any'ncomplete appl:cat,on or supporting material will de applicat,on process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 7i L. 31 D Sr GOV Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Tw o fr,,. Description of Project tom. _. _tt 5r.. _ _ (GEO Code) .6 Fj) EPL Gr l4J Rc.-E,� D6-ra(.0) %€ "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comp) the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner �Tiet,S Representative Marling Address 3,�„ ,c5- - Gfo�t City - State - Zip Telephone No Lot Size (dimensions) Et x l 3l', Land Area 0 09 Height of Budd ngs Stories Pnncipal '.— Accesso tv: H lmcnamara\shelaTLANAPP April 12 2002 SITE AND tie55) Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED FEES Special/Conditional Use Permit .,Variance _Resubdivision _Subdivision* (Signature is required) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area Existing PO Proposed fc 1(p Paved Impervious Area No of off-street parking Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature square fee )2 +a18= 140 square feet square feet square feet spaces 'L�' . Z. Lam. ktt.' . 1' l 186 N' ea- 4 Ofr61 X 1 31 Existing Garage Setbacks: Side - 2'3' Rear - 2 3 p. CreAk144 (r,11w 5r- 53 19 Existing Garden Shed/Playhouse Existing Garage 0 N 182 tki 181 —30- - 1111 �o�zt.if 712 3rd Street South Residence 30 OLitiv rAgkit NIC S1 tNF c1JO 1_IC A 0. LA./ SLAB. '(t = I' Proposed Garage Setbacks Side 2 3 Rear 2 3 'le," Ovezkv- it ,opecrY (oo') 4 ) 26 Qk Proposed Garage 4-keati ' 201 4^;N".) 116 Co N 0 0 0 0 D Existing Garden Shed/Piayhous 182 N c0 cer N —J18 t— 30 --11 t co v 712 3rd Street South Residence CO —O in 30 -ru FR- >Ot,—c'L1 r PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO. V/03-31 Planning Commission Date. Apnl 14, 2003 Project Location 122 Lakeside Dnve Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Zoning District RB/BS Applicants Name Matthew McGuire and Andrea Saterbak Type of Application Variance Project Description Request to construct residence with variance to Bluff and Front yard setbacks Discussion The proposal is to remove the existing residence and to reconstruct a new residence The new residence- would meet the 100 foot shoreland setback and the main residential structure meet the 40 foot bluffline setback requirement A proposed 274 square foot deck would extend a maximum of 19 feet into the bluff setback The structure and deck that is being removed does not meet either the bluff or shoreline setback A variance to the front yard setback for the new structure is requested to move the residence away from the river A setback of 16'5" is requested for the front facing garage and a stair well/entrance as proposed would be setback 12 feet Besides the rear deck, a third level roof deck is proposed for the structure The roof deck could effect neighborhood privacy and be a new design element for the neighborhood It is recommended that if the variance for the first level deck is approved, the roof deck would be eliminated from the design Recommendation Approval of first level deck bluff variance and front yard setbacks with removal of the roof deck Proposed Findings The proposed development replaces the development impacts on the St Croix Riverway Conditions of Approval 1 The colors of the house shall be earth tone as approved by the Community Development Director 2 A drainage plan shall be reviewed by the City Engineer before a building permit is issued directing drainage away from the bluff 3 The condition of the on -site septic system shall be inspected and certified as up to date for size of structure by a licensed inspector 4 The owners shall commit to connecting to city sewer services when services are available 1 5 A landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted to the city for review and approval that screens the deck and stabilizes river bank areas 6 A drainage /erosion control plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved with building permit application to protect the site from construction activity and control runoff Attachments Application plans and DNR comments Mailing Address »� I akeside Drive City - State - Zip Sti 11 water, MN 55082 Telephone N '51-430-1223 Signature at re is required) Lot Size (dimensions) Land Area 57 S Height of Buildings Pnncipal Accessory SITE X See Attached Ft Stories Feet See attached secti H Vncnamaralsheila\PLANAPP FRM Apnl 12 2002 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER _Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET X Variance $70/200 STILLWATER, MN 55082 ._Resubdivision $100 Subdivision' $100+50/I( Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _ Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineeringfees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracyof all forms submitted in connection with any appl►cation All supporting and supporting submitted with app/icat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater material material (i e, photos, sketches, etc) supporting material is required If apphcation is submitted to the City Council, Sixteenwelve) 12 c s of copies supporting material ►s required ( ) opies of A site plan is required with apphcations Any incomplete appl,cation or supporting appl,cation process p g material will delay PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 122 Lakeside Drive Bluffland/Shoreland Zoning Distnctover1ay Dist !Ascription of Project Case No U Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED FEES Assessor's Parcel No R21 030 20 14 0025 Reconstruction of existingEh�omeode) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence sub respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further cert ►yedh il h in the permit if it is granted and used "atthew McGuire fvccomom ply v Property Owner Andrea Saterbak Representative James F Lammers Mailing Address_18a5Nnrth Western Av City- State - Zip Sti 1 lwater, MN 55082 Telephone No 651-439-2878 Signature AND PROJECT DESCRIP Survey Total Budding floor area M F Existing 1368 square feet on M F Proposed 1539 square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking sp spaces 2 square feet 44 gna ure I required) ►V• N Steve Russell From Molly Shodeen [molly shodeen@dnr state mn us] Sent Friday April 11 2003 9 50 AM To Steve Russell Cc John Linc Stine Subject Mcguire variances I agree that the deck would be more appropriate on the riverside than to raise the roof to accomodate a stair structure to a roof deck Without the roof deck structures, the roofline elevation would not change much from what is currently there We do have concerns about the amount of impervious surface, is it under the 20%' The plans I received show existing impervious surface at 22%, but do not show proposed calculations We also have concerns about the septic adequacy I don't think the city should allow a structure without adequate septic capability unless there is a guaranteed plan and construction timetable for sanitary sewer In these days of tight budgets, it is difficult to make guarantees There have been a lot of problems with septic adequacy and site suitability in this subdivision and we would oppose a variance if the septic is not up to code and certified to accomodate the increase in bedrooms I would also recommend that a landscape plan be developed that includes plans to stabilize any areas of the bluff that may be eroding The site must be heaviliy protected with erosion control during construction, including street cleaning if material is tracked off site The use of heavy equipment on the bluff side must be minimized The color of all trim, roof and sidinig materials must be earth or summer vegetation tones Please include my comments in the hearing record I plan on attending the hearing When will it be on the agenda' 1 i James F Lammers Robert G Briggs * Mark J Vierling • 4- Thomas J Weidner •4- Susan D Olson 4- David K Snyder Timothy M kelley Sean P Stokes Balers Fleeren LAW OFFICES OF Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling, P.L L P 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, Muinesota 55082 (651) 439-2878 FAX (651) 439-2923 Direct Dial (651) 351-2115 March 26, 2003 Steve Russell Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Matt McGuire/Andrea Saterbak Setback Vanance Request 122 Lakeside Dnve, Stillwater Dear Steve Paul A Wolff (1944 1996) LA lc J Eckberg Of Counsel •Qualified Neutral Arbitrator *Certified Real Estate Specialist +Qualified Neutral Mediator As you are aware, I represent Matt McGuire and Andrea Saterbak who reside at 122 Lakeside Dnve in the City of Stillwater My clients desire to rebuild their existing home and m order to do so, setback vanances are required Enclosed please find their Application and in support of their Application, 16 copies of a Site Survey, a Partial Site Plan and a Preliminary Section of the proposed new home As set forth on the Site Plan, the existing residential structure encroaches into the 40 foot bluffland setback and the 100 foot shoreland setback It is the desire of my client to bnng the proposed new residential structure mto compliance with the bluffland and shoreland ordmances, and in order to do so, it will be necessary to demolish the existing home and rebuild it A total of 274 square feet of the existmg residential structure is in violation of the current bluffland and shoreland setbacks and will be removed 191 square feet of the existing structure presently encroaches on the 40 foot bluff land setback and 83 feet presently encroaches on the 100 foot shoreland setback In addition, the existing deck, which is 381 square feet in size and which is presently located totally within the shoreland and bluffland setback area will be removed The area of the proposed new deck is 274 square feet and that will require a variance of 19 feet from the 100 foot shoreland setback The proposed structure will also require front yard setback vanance of 13 5 feet since it is proposed to be constructed with a setback of 16 5 feet and the required setback is 30 feet A narrow stair tower leadmg to a proposed potential roof deck would also require a front yard setback vanance since it is proposed to have a 12 foot setback With the exception of the narrow stair tower, it is the intent to reconstruct the residential structure so that the roof line of the new structure will be at or near the roof line of the existing dwelling The new structure will have three bedrooms similar to the existing structure The existing drainage pattern will not be significantly changed Every attempt will be made to direct roof water toward the street, rather than toward the nver No modifications of the septic system will be required regarding this project and the existing septic system was installed in 1999 My clients desire to hook up to city sewer as soon as it becomes available The home is proposed to be built of natural wood and St Croix Valley limestone The proposed new home will continue to be visually inconspicuous from the nver No existing trees are proposed to be affected by the construction project and there will be professional landscaping done as a part of the project The new home will be setback further from the St Croix River than the neighboring homes on each side and the front yard setbacks will be approximately the same as the neighbonng homes To the best of my clients' knowledge, none of their neighbors have any objections to the new structure, as proposed Because of the various setback requirements, this 13,457 square foot lot is unbuildable without the requested vanances I believe my clients have shown that they have made every reasonable effort to comply with the bluffland and shoreland setback requirements, but as a result, they will need a vanance for the deck and the front yard setbacks I believe my clients have shown that they would like to use their property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the Ordmances Specifically, regarding the findings that the Planning Commission needs to make, I submit the following A Because of the overlapping setback requirements, a residential structure cannot be located on the subject property without vanances being granted My clients have made every reasonable effort to fully comply with the bluffland and shoreland setbacks and as a result, they do require a variance for the deck which will be much further removed from the nver than the ongmal deck, and front yard setbacks B The use of the subject property for residential purposes cannot happen without variances being granted and the plight of my clients is due to the circumstances unique to this property and not created by them 2 C The vanances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality since the proposed home will be set back further from the river than the neighboring homes and will set back a similar distance from the street as the neighboring homes D Stnct enforcement of the setback requirements is impractical since the result would be that no home could be located on this property E The vanances, if granted, are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of my client's property rights and, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvilege not enjoyed by neighbors F The grantmg of the variances would not be of substantial detriment to adjacent properties and would not entirely impair the purpose and the intent of the City Ordinances or the public interest or adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan G I am also aware that the provisions in the Zoning Ordinance relating to substandard lots, provide in relevant part that lots in the bluffland/shoreland overlay dzstnct that do not meet requirements, such as setback requirements may be allowed as building sites when the dimensional standards are complied with to the greatest extent practicable As set forth above, we believe we have met this test because the setback standards from the nver have now been met, with the exception of the deck, and the requested setbacks from the street are the muumum setbacks needed in order to construct the proposed home Should you need any additional information or should you have additional questions regarding the requested vanances, I would appreciate you giving me a call Thank you for your excellent cooperation to date regarding this matter JFL alm Enclosures cc Matt McGuire Andrea Saterbak Kelly Davis Yours very trul/v4t4 es F Lammers 3 Lo\v►1 rL°o. 1 _ - --------—-- i+AIR\vELL METAL Dick ItAIL 1-MIcAL Ex15♦1H; )4oulf 74 Bt pM6vtr2 �Asi- ELEYni'1op '; 'w1N', pktLIMINAPI, MAScUJJc 1-poM )Ivtp_ _ \VooD SIDJN, --- M`ciiim S^i-Ep^ i Notes: Notes: o Indicates #13774 iron pipe in place. Bearing system is an assumed datum. Offsets shown to existing structures are measured to the outside building wall line, unless shown or noted otherwise hereon. Any projections from said wall line such as eaves, sills, steps, etc., will impact offsets shown accordingly. "T" Indicates metal fence post guard stake. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR' Underground or overhead public or private utilities, on or adjacent the parcel, were not located in conjunction with this survey, unless shown or noted otherwise hereon. Verify location of all utilities on or adjacent the parcel prior to any construction or excavation on the parcel. "&" Indicates trunk centerline of tree as noted. Tree canopies are not shown. Matt McGuire and Andrea M. Saterbak, 122 Lakeside Drive, Stillwater, MN 55082 BARRETT M. STACK STILLWATER, MINN. 55082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR Tel. No. 439-5630 DESCRIPTION' As Supplied: (copy of Certificate of Title No. 55795) Lot Two (2), LAKEVIEW TERRACE, according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said Washington County, State of Minnesota. ii/OdS.6- /t 1, /2¢ A \\ is- N s78,7 NOTES: The BENCHMARK, and spot elevations shown hereon, are based on National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) 1929 Adjustment. Do not use spot elevations for any purpose other than general site information. Use the BENCHMARK for future h site development. Ta EXISTING SITE AREA CALCULATIONS: 'tom / 1 1 - - ti "4t7'zi y� 67/. S LA/00 0 G9t f ;. -O ausH rl ' ` a h /lik4 /0" 7es.7 O I APPLE M I. TI, o I 4 h" — 1 a \\\ fig' i L) Zo, 3 M ens —As A` f cZrece- X 757.r 1� 6�R. EA7ey 7/c.fi Z/.6 //iN l CONC. l7ei✓z • N Dg'• c� Overall Parcel Area: Existing Hardcover Area: Existing Pervious Area: 87.67-- .Pc . W.ut F LI in I I it I v I skA � I g• aI $pMf 707.8 • 54. Z/ //, / /7474L S/1 A'.4 5Y1/RS U o. 0, /22 LA.r / 7a/7 /srFk.e. 7/7.7/ �7 /.3 Ij Pere e 709. / UNOIE _ 1 I �709/i 1 /7.0 7°`, 7 708.72 Bterr/ ti // YZ,G lj�.�-_ -/6.9 -r /200� l ..7i1739. , 7/4, 7 . co,vc. . li g L AieE 8. 4 ..97 ©e v.••tve' ZO.d6 dc/ssr 7/5,a7 7/4.3 ��: — — A/0°J�'3SW R Q oPJo S/DE T��k 1 Jap pi) �Gtia 6767 --- I I 1 � ti 0\ I 7/6.8 .Z,vv. 67d7s/OZ- ITYPic) 13457 sq. ft. 2954 sq. ft. (21.95%) 10503 sq. ft. (78.05%) ‘75 C.2 FA lc let cz 7.1 D•PivE • FOA/( . 7/G,30 RECEIVED MAR 2 3 2003 COMMUNITY .. I hereby certify that_shiafrvey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of theStatr of lldinncanta... ■ ®- i >A �' Date ASUIRIEW TREV4S1ON l tX14tI145 DE4-1‘ _ _ FxiStIN, )4 vft 6� Olutt i EthA« to 0 I1 00 f y4- J .16 s —c _ v >o at— cL :) ExIStINg, H°vtt 4 cA1W (-4v c1,2 '+I 3' 1 R 1 V F uv r Y -� 2 AY 0 )0. WAVel �xIStiNS 4 Bluff - ¶ FrAek _ fxlSt►ht4 Hav5E — SEfPi/lc.k MMcuIRE/SAilM AL SI+E o q )6 — 7 .cEASt EOC, t 'r Cu►,r, i L ^ k E S 1 D 4 h PR Iv 1AXIM'IM ALLOW/%61t )+El514t _ fxIS+I1J4 0 M ExISt,N4 ik°°P ScHtMntic. SEcf- I _ Lovk1N5 50u3-)4. E➢ `�' \vlb* St'AIRkvULL 13ENIND _ _IfxiStiRc M IDtHc E 4 KE ikEMovEP _ _ pRDtof .D ixiSf (vRIS —7 _SRnue RtlaH_D M�JRe/SAtEtAlc 4, r PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/03-32 Planning Commission Date April 14, 2003 Project Location 523 West Moore Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Erica Fultz Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard (street) setback (30 feet required, 20 feet requested) for construction of a second story addition Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to construct a second story addition over the existing kitchen A Variance to the front yard setback was granted December last year to add on to an existing porch A second story has been added to the east side of the house, not needing a Variance The applicant is on a corner lot, which means each side of the house that faces a street is considered a "front yard" The kitchen is on the west side of the house, this side 20 feet from the property line and is abutting William Street, creating need to request a Variance to the required 30 foot setback There are a number of two story homes in this area Adding a 2" story would conform to the neighborhood Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The addition shall be similar in style, materials, and color as the existing building Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors w 3 That the authonzing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 //03 30 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED peciai/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision _Subdivision* $100+50/Ic Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and eng►neenng fees FEES $50/200 $70/200 $100 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any appl►cation All supporting submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of) supporting material is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting matenal is required A site plan is required with appl,cations Any incomplete apphcation or supporting matenal will delay application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Zoning District 1(LkAb f(dtL Assessor's Parcel No Description of Project OCICI 6 mo/ Oaf -- cry.) soiAGElfi;/#1,yde) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in respects, to the best of my knowledge and belef, to be true and correct ! further certify I will comply r the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Mailing Address City - State - Zip, Telephone No Signature e is required) Lot Size (dimensions) x2I7 Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Principal ,`Z Accessory — SITE AND Feet 021. Representative L) P A-6 c 0- �� ✓ i' i i ►' t. Mailing Address 7 t LAJ kr2`—p S'f City - State - Zip c 7A'%/'c't/tV re�Y- 77.'1 5 s Telephone No l 3'I—c 'V c Signature (Signature is required) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area Existing a Proposed 3 06 Paved Impervious Area No of off-street parking 0-0 square feet square feet square feet squale feet spaces ,,I H Wmcnamaralsheila\PLANApp FRM April 12 2002 AVENUE 150 d 1 150 $ 2 11 5 6P3e41 Location Map 10 A re poNO MINN DNR DIV t PROTECTED WETLANDS 10 FT WIDE ROAD EASEMENT PER 241 DEEDS WEST 41 41 29 �f 10 9 4P^251 1 21 29 00321 34 1 24 41 29 MOOR 10 1 41 27 7 WEST SYCAMC 20.5 ,0 21 0030) 24 5 4 26 27 464 g WEST ST CROI 15 A 14 12 9 7 elan 4 R_IW R20W R19W R_W R_IW R-1)W Vicinity Map 0 151 Scale in Feet nW dna, mull al mapW., mi apse.. al Imisl reads as fty ems. .._-_aas s.a r.ti..e P.oss vp Wsraymm.a. as a.wrssa.n.em as Seem w __Burr,.Mks Res 1 ommeg a.WarRim SOmMD ---iCX itr---NY)4131_ _ - - - ---- I 4-' ct-P3 ----? azam - ea _ 1 vsmilami- 7i-u. ►: -6:1 i.\\N\\*\\NN. \ el,. ,, U-i b 114 : %•1 a- 1510 -- F12114)29- -...Nc:4...eik..........,1 i L., �— SI 101 114 41.191 — i i 036 1sUc- 1 4I PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO. V/03-33 ei"- Planning Commission Date April 14, 2003 Project Location 320 North Second Street Comprehensive Plan Distract Single Family, small lot Zoning District RB Applicants Name Deborah Asch Type of Application Variance Project Description Variance to density requirements to allow duplex on 7,500 square foot lot Discussion The lot area requirements for a duplex is 10,000 square feet The site contains 7,500 square feet The variances are not granted for density A zoning amendment could be requested, but the site was recently zoned RB consistent with the Downtown Plan Proposed Findings The proposed development is inconsistent with RB Zoning density requirements Recommendation Denial Attachments Application PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No ACTION REQUESTED peCial/Conditional Use Permit ariance Resubdivision Subdivision* _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any apphcation All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting matenal is required If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay t application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project gap Ai 9 JVro Assessor's Zoning District � Description of Project le;rUO id o,,,, &01,,,v, covv 140 ,c.,1,\I cx is- +,--, vlei i ,-1- FEES $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot Parcel No ,;L7 6, 7 6;6 - (GEO Code) LU / try t'f CAP e) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in a respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply wi the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner PT \Pc iro\ k AkCir Mailing Address f ‘,N ' 4 ' 0 City - State - Zip 454.,t_\, t f A Telephone No&9 a y� 63r� 'B' 'd t / Signature�Q j�.1((j /�{j�t 2._ (Signature is required) Lot Size (dimensions)S0 x I �C) Land Area 7 5ne_7/ Height of Buildings Stories Principal Accessory i Feet . H \mcnamaralsheiia\PLANAPP FRM April 12 2002 Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area square feet Existing /o s q square feet Proposed / s square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces 2 To the planning commission- 3-30-03 I am requesting a variance on the statute that states a requisite amount of ten thousand square feet of land for development of duplex structures I am presently on a lot that is seven thousand five hundred square feet and intend on building an "up and down" condo The lots next to mine have double dwellings and the development of a duplex on my lot would fit m well I believe that my houseis presently out of scale and by making this improvement to the lot I would fit m more with the neighborhood If at all possible I would hke to build on the existmg foundation and mamtam the North Wall Thank You, Deborah Asch ,b1Q.ofet Uth`f gel A-tv\) IA vAt,L i °LA /k u1 rf ; i ► Q) ibuce Nortfrts/O', Above brace fET/I`ktic 41-.5 } S i0 a- WALK SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDU Brower Asch Pn perty Address 320 2nd St N City Stillwater Lender Mortgages Unlimited, Inc State Mn PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/03-34 Planning Commission Date Apnl 14, 2003 Project Location 704 South First Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name Ron and Cynthia Hanmg Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Descnption A Special Use Permit for the Lady Goodwood Bed and Breakfast Discussion - The request is for a Special Use Permit to conduct a three (3)-bedroom bed and breakfast in a 113-year-old Queen -Anne Victonan home at 704 South First Street This building has been used as a bed and breakfast since January 1995 The new propnetors will retam the name of the inn, Lady Goodwood Inn, and they plan to operate the inn the same way as the previous owners There are four on -site parking spaces for the bed and breakfast use Three spaces will be used for the bed and breakfast and one for owner/manager This is consistent with the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance There are an additional two parking spaces are located inside the carnage house The Hentage Preservation Commission reviewed the application at the Apnl 7, 2003 meeting There recommendation is approval of the Special Use Permit, along with the Special Events Permit, together with the following conditions of approval Recommendation Approval with conditions Conditions of Approval 1 The manager of the residence shall live on -site 2 Before use as a bed and breakfast, the building and cooking facilities shall be approved by the County Health Officer, Fire Marshall and City Building Official and a Letter of Occupancy received by the Community Development Director 3 One parking space for each guest room shall be set aside Two spaces available on site for manager 4 If provided, dining facilities for breakfast shall be available to registered guests only (not available to the public) 5 No liquor shall be sold on premises If wine is sold, a wine license must be obtained from the City (Ord #768 Adopted 10-22-92) 6 One four square foot sign is allowed on -site consistent with the architectural character of the building (maximum height four feet) 7 Adequate pedestrian scale lighting shall be provided between the bed and breakfast and parking 8 No general external lighting of the site that may impact the surrounding residential area is allowed 9 The special use permit is not transferable New property owners or managers shall require a new special use permit 10 The bed and breakfast use permit shall be reviewed before the Planning Commission and City Council for revocation if complaints regarding the bed and breakfast use are received by the Commu.mty Development Director Special Use Permit for Special Events 1 A maximum of six special events (large functions defined as busmess meetings, bus tours, bndal and wedding showers, anmversanes, weddings and wedding receptions, and church functions) over twenty persons allowed per month 2 All special event visitors shall park on site or at a controlled remote location 3 Limit of groups 40 capacity as approved unless special approval is obtained from the City Council 4 Food must be served by a licensed caterer 5 All special events shall be over by 9 00pm 6 No open bar on premises for special events Champagne is allowed on a two-person/one bottle limit 7 No outside entertainment or lighting for special events 8 This permit shall be reviewed upon complaint 9 Cynthia and Ronald Hannig, owners of the property, shall be on site dunng all special events This use is not transferable Findings Special Use Permit The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zomng ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan HPC Action 4/7/03 +6-0 •Ftrk actt Ce t %S 3 o1 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No FEES X Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 _ Vanance $70/200 _Resubdivision $100 Subdivision* $100+50, _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $ 70 *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees The appl,cant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting maten. submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (► e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with appl,cat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Sixteen (16) copies of supporting material is required If appbcat►on is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies o supporting material is required A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will del application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 7O y �o �}-titi ;r- �- ��-F Assessor's Parcel No 30S — Z4 LAC Zoning Distnct BP) Description of Project __DpeC-1 al L15 C. F t- m i.+, ;EO Code) �e5i l-�C,e aL, a 3-Lie sf room tie(a "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct 1 further certify I will compl the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner gnnnkd��{✓\i-L1 -- c, r )11 j Representative Mailing Address f v; U)pAf- ��o s-hrj t JJ Mailing Address City - State - Zip 5-}-I t11t! ri pit ;\) ` 5 2_ City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature Signature Is requir d) Lot Size (dimensions)13Sx ►01 Land Area I►-110L)O 599 Height of Buildings Stthles Feet Principal 3 Accessory Telephone No Signature (Signature is required) SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area 3 1 `5H square fee Existing 1 i 2- 8l , square feet Proposed 5 square feet Paved Impervious Area 1, io o Csquare feet No of off-street parking spaces 5— H \rncnamaralsheila1PLANApp FRM Apnl 12 2002 Ron and Cynthia Hannig 613 West Oak Street Stillwater, MN 55082 (651) 351-9081 March 28, 2003 Planning Commission Hentage Preservation Commission Re Special/Conditional Use Permit Application To Whom it May Concern Enclosed please find the Application Form and supporting documentation for a Special/Conditional Use Permit A purchase agreement has been entered into between us (Ron and Cynthia Hailing, the buyers) and Nick and Susan Chaves (the sellers), for the property located at 704 South First Street, in the city of Stillwater Ownership will transfer on May 12, 2003 We are requesting a special use permit to continue the operation of the Lady Goodwood Bed and Breakfast We have been Stillwater residents and homeowners for seven years, and have two children m the Stillwater schools, as well as one preschooler _ We have a vested -interest m the prosperity of the community Ron is a Systems Engineer for United Defense and will continue working there Cynthia is currently teaching part-time at the Mahtomedi Alternative Learning Program and will assume most of the operational duties of the bed and breakfast We will operate the mn m the same way the previous owners have, m strict compliance with community guidelines, and in harmony with the neighborhood The residence will retain operating with three guest rooms, be owner -occupied, and we will at all times maintain the residence and grounds in a responsible manner and in harmony with the neighborhood and community Planning Administration Application Page Two Cynthia has extensive expenence in the food service and hotel industry, working in the past as a cook, waitress and hostess in vanous hotel restaurants She is also currently spending time with local innkeepers becoming familiar with the routines and procedures of the inn keeping life She ran her own consultmg business for a penod of two years Additionally, Ron and Cynthia have owned a rental property in Coon Rapids for eight years and have extensive dealing with business transactions related to real estate We began our courtship in Stillwater ten years ago, and it has inspired us ever since — to the point that we bought a home and moved here seven years ago We have stayed in many bed and breakfast inns, and have always dreamt of running a Victorian mn ourselves The Lady Goodwood is the fulfillment of those dreams, and we intend to honor the Victonan traditions of this grand old home, and this grand community Smcerel , Ron and Cynthia Hanitrg 1 REAR YARD PROF #; LINE TPROP.1 tifARAGE1 ____1 r3 'toil EXISTING HOUSE GIP 1 s FR 011�IT YARD -709 firs-' w'`- 5CLA I.L PROPERTY ADDRESS 1 ) i N O f x CL UCENTERLINE OF S SAMPLE SITE PLAN __ INDICATE ALL DIMENSIONS AND SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINES AND BUILDINGS