Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-11-13 CPC PacketIlwater • T HPLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Tuesday, November 13, 2001 at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of October 8, 2001 Public Hearings - 7 p m AGENDA 1 Case No V/01-51 A variance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 2 feet requested) for the construction on a 20 x 13 6 foot addition at 419 North Greeley Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Tim and Kay Guild, applicant 2 Case No SUP/V/DR/01-52 A special use permit for a 29 unit residential use in the Central Business District, CBD, with variances to the front yard setback (15 feet required, 5 feet requested), rear yard setback (20 feet required, 10 5 feet requested), parking spaces required (92 spaces required, 76 spaces provided) and height limit (50 feet required, 53 feet proposed) and design review permit at 501 North Main Street (Domino's Pizza Site) in the CBD, Central Business District and the FP, Flood Plain Jeff Wallis, applicant 3 Case No V/01-53 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 17' 6"requested) for the construction of a 2nd story addition to an existing structure at 1412 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District Brett Christianson, applicant 4 Case No SUB/01-54 A resubdivision of existing 6 lots into 4 lots of 12,436 49 square feet each at 702 St Croix Avenue West in the RB, Two Family Residential District Timothy J Freeman, representing Clark and Adam Nyberg, applicant 5 Case No V/01-55 A variance to the side yard setback (20 feet required, 8'5 5" requested) for the construction of an exterior exit stairway and two elevated decks on the east side of the building located on the south side of Olive Street between Second and Third Streets in the CBD, Central Business District Jerry Runk, representing Donald and Marianne Nolde, applicant 6 Case No ZAT/01-02 An amendment of Fence Ordinance and Supplemental Regulations Regulating the Location and Height of Fences in Residential Districts City of Stillwater, applicant 7 Case No V/01-50 A modification to approved plans including a special use permit, variance and design review for the St Croix Boat and Packet Co , Ticket Office located south of the Main Street Parking Lot (525 South Main Street) in the CBD, Central Business District Mark Balay, representing St Croix Boat and Packet Co , applicant Other Items -TH 36 Partnership Study process discussion -Swimming Pool Ordinance -Rivertown Trolley review -Andiamo Special Use .Parmit. Z1 review FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission October 8, 2001 Present Russ Hultman, chair Glenna Bealka, Robert Gag, David Peroceschi, Karl Ranum, Paul Teske Darwin Wald and Terry Zoller Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent Dave Middleton Mr Hultman called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Wald, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval of the minutes of Sept 10, 2001, as presented, motion passed unanimously Case No SUP/01-43 A special use permit for a martial arts/dance school with once office at 215 N Williams St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Sara Gilberg, applicant (Continued from Sept 10) Present were Ms Gilberg and Timothy Quarberg, the potential tenant Mr Quarberg explained his plans for the space and his philosophical view of martial arts Ms Gilberg stated she and her family live in the neighborhood and have tned to be careful in choosing the nght tenant Gary Stares, the property owner immediately adjacent to the building, asked if the city had inspected for parking spaces Mr Russell stated that according to the city ordinance, the proposed use requires 17 parking spaces, which can be accommodated in the parking lot Mr Starns shows photos of a yellow no -parking space that had been painted black He also raised a question about a garage door that had been installed Jana Vaughn, 722 Mulberry St , spoke on behalf of the Gilbergs She stated the neighborhood had improved since the Gilbergs purchased the property She noted they had put a lot of work and effort into the building and had gone to great lengths to find a tenant appropnate to the neighborhood Mary Starns said there are not 28 spaces in the parking lot She also stated the proposal will result in constant turmoil, parking and traffic problems and noise Mr Ranum asked if the garage door was part of the ongmal plans submitted by the Gilbergs Mr Russell said plans show a door at that location, but it doesn't look like a garage door Mr Ranum expressed a concern about the garage's impact on neighbors Mr Zoller stated the proposed use would have less of an impact on neighbors than other possible use He moved approval as conditioned, noting there was no reason not to approve the request Mrs Bealka seconded the motion Mr Hultman suggested adding a condition that the yellow no- • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission October 8, 2001 parking line be repainted according to the ongmal agreement Mr Russell suggested conditions could be added that all deliveries be made between 8 a m and 4 p m Monday through Fnday, that delivery vehicles not block the roadway or dnveway and that the garage door remain closed except when vehicles are entenng or exiting the garage Mr Ranum suggested adding a condition that signage be installed indicating delivery vehicles are allowed only between 8 a m and 4 p m Mr Ranum, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved the amendments to the ongmal motion Mr Zoller stated the amendments were acceptable to him Mr Ranum seconded the amended motion Amended motion passed unanimously Case No V/01-49 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 5 feet request) for construction of an addition to an existing garage at 115 N Hamet St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Mark Balay, representing John and Madeline Macindoe, applicant Mr Balay was present and reviewed drawings of the proposed addition He noted that with the addition, basically a garden shed structure, the garage will be under the 1,000 feet allowable for accessory structures Mr Ranum asked if the eaves on the new structure overhang the wall of the existing garage, and if they do, if it would be possible to change that in the plans Mr Balay said that change was acceptable Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, with the additional condition that no part of the new structure extend west of the existing building line Motion passed unanimously Case No V/01-50 A modification to approved plans including a special use permit, variance and design review for the St Croix Boat and Packet Co ticket office, south of the Main Street parking lot in the CBD, Central Business Distnct Mark Balay, representing St Croix Boat and Packet Co , applicant Mr Balay reviewed the requested changes to the onginal SUP The pnmary issue of discussion was the request for vehicular access to the upper plateau near the ticket office The onginal plans called for four parking spaces, and the request is to make that area available for drop-off for handicapped persons only Mr Balay said his client had no problem with staffs' recommendation that buses not be allowed to use the dnveway for drop-off Members' pnmary concern was one of safety due to cars backing up after dropping persons off Mr Ranum suggested the possibility of eliminating one or two of the parking spaces so cars could loop around, rather than having to back up There also was a suggestions to have the drop- off at the existing curb cut Mr Russell noted that with plans for development of the Aiple property, the goals is to keep as much congestion as possible off the pedestnan pathway planned for the Aiple property It was noted that the Downtown Parking Commission currently is undertaking a study of the use of Main Street for additional parking • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission October 8, 2001 After considerable discussion, Mr Ranum moved to approved the realigned pedestnan walkway, to limit the number of parking spaces in the upper plateau area to one and to temporanly close the ingress/egress to the site at the south end of the south city parking lot subject to further study by city staff with more recommendations to be made at the November meeting Mr Gag seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/01-41 A vanance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 0 feet requested) for construction of a single family residence at 1511 N Main St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct and Bluffland/Shoreland Distnct John Hoeschler representing Elayne Aiple, applicant (Continued from Sept 10, 2001, meeting) Present were Mr Hoeschler and Jack Moms, the potential buyer Mr Moms expressed his interest in constructing a single-family residence on the parcel in question He noted that with the 100-foot setback required from the nver and the 25-foot setback from the railroad tracks, he would be left with just 20 feet on which to construct a residence Mr Hoeschler suggested the question is what the city wants the ultimate use of the property to be He said the Manna has expressed interest in the property, as have potential developers of the Temtonal Pnson site to provide nver access for condo owners He said there is pressure on the property and some type of development will occur He suggested that a single-family residence would be the least intrusive use Mr Zoller said his personal preference would be for the property to be in public use He noted that a goal of the city has been to get the Temtonal Prison site back on the tax rolls, and he would look favorably on a use of the Aiple property that might encourage development of the pnson site Mr Teske also spoke in favor of putting the pnson site back on the tax rolls, and of providing nver access to more people than a single-family residence would Mr Russell noted the city had not received any response from the DNR on the proposal due to the state employees' stnke Mr Hoeschler also stated he thought the DNR would prefer a single- family residence as least intrusive He also noted that a single-family residence likely would generate more taxes than a homeowners' association use would Bruce Ahlers, 110 Lakeside Dr , who owns property to the north of the Aiple property, spoke in favor of the single-family use He said he was opposed to the increased traffic other uses might bnng Mr Ranum said the parcel is developable, even without the requested vanance Mr Ranum, seconded by Mr Teske, moved to deny the vanance Mr Zoller, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved to amend the motion to grant a 10-foot vanance from the rear setback Motion on the amendment failed on a 4-4 vote, with Mr Zoller, Mrs Bealka, Mr Hultman and Mr • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission October 8, 2001 Peroceschi voting for the amendment, and Mr Wald, Mr Gag, Mr Teske and Mr Ranum voting against Vote on the original motion to deny the vanance passed 6-2, with Mrs Bealka and Mr Peroceschi voting against Other items • Fence Ordinance revisions — Mr Ranum said members had previously talked about the sight line triangle for corner lots Mr Russell said there is wording regarding the provision in the city's supplemental regulations Mr Ranum, seconded by Mr Peroceschi, voted to include the language regarding the sight tnangle in the Fence Ordinance, motion passed unanimously Mr Ranum also expressed concern about allowing fences to be placed on property lines as proposed • Swimming Pool Ordinance revisions — Consensus was that the entire ordinance needs reworking Mr Ranum, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved to direct staff to reconsider the proposed revisions, motion passed unanimously Mr Wald, seconded by Mr Ranum, moved to adjourn at 10 20 p m , all in favor Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V01/51 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2001 Project Location 419 Noth Greeley Street --t,' - Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Tim and Kay Guild Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance to the side -yard setback (10 feet required, 2 feet requested) for the construction of an addition Discussion The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 13 6 x 20 foot second floor addition to an existing 1'% story home The original house appears to have been two stories, and over time a number of one-story additions were added The proposal is to construct the addition over one of these one story additions The pitch of the existing second floor roof would be adjusted to bring the ridge of the new roof to match The addition will be sided with the same siding of the existing structure Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 Drainage shall remain on site 2 Plans must be approved by the Building Official 3 All changes to the approved plan be reviewed by the Community Development Director 4 Addition shall be similar in architecture, matenals and color Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same distract and • L • • in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Floor Plan/Elevation Drawings Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED Fees Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 Vanance $70/200 _Resubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineenng fees (see attached) The app!►cant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (: e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with app!►cations Any incomplete applcat►on or supporting materia! will delay the application process COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 �c2 ac) y ``// PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 441q 4/ 6,e ee L e L/ S 1- Assessor's Parcel No 02gr—G D "� DO& QQ / (G O Code) Zoning District R6 Description of Project 2 nd FIDo r add, 0.9 "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner / 7,, : k 67 Lc ► co( Mailing Address 4/ 9 N i'e Let 5/- City - State - Zip / /wct_Je r- Telephone No (o -/ - 471 3 9 - 6/// a- S►gnature a.--y Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) 5'r x /20 Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area I i 9 / square feet Existing I'l ?7 square feet Proposed 26b square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H Mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 R_IK ru r r r9N rsN ti R_VW RI9W R. W R_Iu R_OW Vicinity Map 0 147 Scale in Feet 644 a44 "no boor. SMla m oneb more row en, m.o.. Cm./ rn mono .fer an comm.= Shim worm,.Coon SwmW ra Mu Masa en.K0 Nero m sent lnuWnA.9m 100 Wm Nee 0.0e. 4 PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM , 4.... iSu U f de No 991c • • um _ Timothy_Guild _ xdyAMIcss_ 419 Greeley Street North __ Stillwater Counly Washington dm St Paul Financial Center State MN ZipCMe 55082 FRONT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY REAR OF SUBJECT PROPERTY STREET SCENE 1 r101 Ap 1 1 (611) 1 6 PI 5 • /a,.5-- Ft F+ 2 • (7, 5- rr I L I IV\ 1\ 2a 1- iii Fx if 4, kk 3r-r LA oo rn 1, 2 4 FT • • • 240x/3-6 mz c/ezf- te,01Z- c-Fkut X a.4- Q a. • JLI EXSITROOF AREA JJ.!J-..J7 11.10 1 � LT]l EXSITING HOUSE EXSITING METAL ROOF NEW 2ND FLOOR ROOM EXSITING MAIN FLOOR AREA LEFT ELEVATION SCALE I/4" • 11-O" • • R ROOM LAIN FLOOR AREA • 011 IIMENIIIMMIIME ME or AI. lioNIIIImiMoor imiimamos NM Or r 111116 AJUST ROOF PITCI1 TO BRING RIDGE OF NEW ROOF AND EXSITING ROOF RIDGE TO MATCH APDX 8/12 LJ LJ LJ ■i LJ LJ L1 L._I FRONT ELEVATION SCALE I/4" • 1'-0° • • m 0 0 0 0 t „o-,l • WI 31'V78 11-0" AbmNIYi9 VNiiisx3 N m ✓ •n Tt# =�3X�z� 3mm.W1 8FA hIm m5 4 8°or zE0touu03ZN v Ntq4®=� <zmOw 010Ai X 22 fiN D Doo3Z m -� _ t r c104.. 60<tgCI m jd m§ z012n6c, N m O iStSZSZStS6t3tS2StS2S2S2S23Z52 8 -O" z 00 3 7A 3 z 11 cmP fE -4 4 7 1/L LY EXSITING LOWER LEVEL EXSITING STAIRWAY SECTION THROUGH SCALE: I/4" • I -0" • • „NOTE.. NEW DOOR GOING INTO ADDITION WILL NEED TO BE FIELD VERIFIED ALSO EXSITING ROOF RALFTERS WILL NEED TO BE CUT BACK AND HEADERED OFF TO GET HEIGHT OF STANDARD DOOR IN WALL 13 -6" 1ST FLR ROOF AREA 1 r- - - -O x 2 -4gi" r EXSITING 2NU FLR LAYOUT PROPOSED OVER MAN 12 -I I45" l'11\+ 3'-0" O NEW ROOM AREA FLOOR FLAT ROOF �r 4r4" L 2-6" 4 3'-0" 1 3'-0" x 5'-0" 14'-119" r 2 -6" MAIN FLOOR FLAT ROOF AREA 1 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUPN/DR 01-52 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2001 Project Location 501 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Jeff Wallis Type of Application Special Use Permit and Variance Project Description A special use permit for a 29 unit residential use in the Central Business District, with variances to the front yard setback (15 feet required, 5 feet requested), rear yard setback (20 feet required, 10 5 feet requested), parking spaces required (76 spaces provided, 92 required) and height limit (50 feet required, 53 feet proposed) Background This case was reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission on June 4, 2001, and by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2001 It was conceptually approved subject to several conditions The Commission directed the staff to work with the applicant to refine the plans, including the engineering, landscape and flood protection plans Discussion The Special Use Permit has not been issued yet Residences of all classifications are permitted in the Central Business District Minimum front yard setback in this area is 15 feet The original plan (5/25/01) showed the building setback the required 15 feet Since that date, information has been obtained the shows MnDot has an additional 18 feet of property right-of-way, reducing the front yard setback to 5 feet The rear yard setback is required for an exit stairway on the back of the building The property angles to the west at the termination of the stairway, creating a need for the variance The proposed building is four stories high, permitted in this zoning district, the design of the building results in a total building height of 53 feet and 62 8 feet to the top of the building parapet, (50 feet required) The building height had to be adjusted after the grading plan was completed to accommodate the floodplain requirements Floodplain requirements and size of the lot create hardships that limit the number of parking spaces provided Poor soils and floodplain restrictions prohibit underground parking and the size of the site prevents the amount of surface • parking required The ordinance requires 58 parking spaces for the residential area of the building and 34 spaces for the retail portion of the property The applicant is showing 76 parking spaces on the site The residents would have 39 indoor parking spaces for the 29 condominium units and shared use of the surface parking The 34 surface parking spaces would be available for retail users during the day One of the conditions of approvals at the June 4, 2001 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting was that the lighting fixtures of the parking lot be the same as other downtown lot lighting, and the boulevard lighting will eventually continue with the same fixtures used south of the project They also rejected the proposed use of up lighting on the building columns, stating that the building lighting should primarily be confined to the first floor retail Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 Final Landscape Plan to be approved by the Planning Department 3 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 4 The surface parking spaces shall be signed for "commercial space customer use" when the commercial use is in operation 5 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 6 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 7 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 8 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy solid masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project and a detail provided to the Planning Department 9 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during construction activity 10 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 11 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 12 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 13 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 14 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 15 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 16 Lighting source shall be sodium 17 Parking lot fixtures be consistent with the approved Downtown lot lighting 18 No up lighting of the building 19 All security lights on building shall be downlit and a plan submitted to the Planning Department 20 A sign permit is required for signage 21 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community Development Director Findings Special Use Permit The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Variance 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Construction Documents/June 11, 2001 Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report HPC Action 11/5/01 Approval +6-0 with following conditions of approval 1 No up lighting of the building 2 Landscape plans reviewed and approved by Planning Department/ 3 Parking lot and boulevard fixtures be the approved Downtown Lights • . i • i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No v 046 l -$p- Date Filed v , / O j Fee Paid 9 - Receipt No PLANNING ADMIJISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED (Y.SpecIaWConditionaI Use Permit AVananc Resubdivision Subdivision* ._Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* _Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance ...,Design Review Fees $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot $500 $300 $500 $70 $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineenng fees (see attached) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted In connection with any application All supporting matenal (i e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan Is required with applications Any Incomplete application or supporting material will delay th apphcahon process (�,,OPPROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 501 NO4 1 O. in Assessor's Parcel No ag 03oa 0/ di003 3 ZoningDistrict eb n (GEO Code) Descnption of Project -Rea eve 1 c) trove* t' S -� e Q S a fie-i-a, l I ReS, de.r , c\ lic, l (II ri "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit If It Is granted and used " Property Owner Representative 3-c C oo..1.: ic Mailing Address Mailing Address atO fad. /0$1 Skeet 140E. City - State - Zip Crty - State - Zip 51-. PaALA M&) /p / Telephone No Telephone No ( _ —7. - : G 1 Signature Signature Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area 51 , 4P6 i Height of Buildings Stories Principal Accessory N/rt SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Feet 53 Total Building floor area square feet Existing '/ , coo square feet Proposed a9,C00 square feet rodt Pi (ti- Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces r( 3 H lmcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 fA )ITY OFa 8 PIONEER PA NgN,y2.2sP c' s s tr.\ 9 - tr. P 50 03031 s Location Map S ;mom s ® Aa Z 1 `g s $ . �' 5 14 9 e i+ \, b P - ▪ i N E 1 s a: 1 + i Ns i, '' tt a s ti ✓ P yRT 0 s� 4 Fa 18 P. 2 ssit 'A1 - O" E L v. t Z :' �# a . G4 a roes8 Z tl�- 1 r !+ s. L gym' a ` "iv a• tl • S• li'rnm sE / l lzl 6 �� sr a z r p °" Z m t •t i t s'+ E T?� ``E C� r n'. F� E1 s I LAKE ST CRC MINN DNR OM OF WATERS PROTECTED WATER at P 11. r ‚/‚-r a R_IW R-OW RI9W R_W R_IW R_OW Vicinity Map 0 219 Scale in Feet s. q a. .. a . co,w_�a 0, wan. .rgen Cooly *Thee T. Mho. *odd te i..aa�rwe �bVI mar..v .o...._.. C_... SWF.. O.,. 40. Parch doh weed. .. Mae w..a 2120 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/DR/01-26 Planning Commission Date June 11, 2001 Project Location 501 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business Distnct Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Jeff Wallis Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit for the construction of 29-32 condominiums Discussion Residences of all classifications are permitted in the Central Business Zorung District with a Special Use Permit Maximum allowed height of buildings in this area is 4 stones or 50 feet New buildings are required to have a 15 foot front yard setback, 20 foot rear setback and 20 total for two sides (10 feet — 10 feet or zero — 20 feet) The site for the proposed condominium is situated in the floodplain distract and will need to build within the floodplain regulations They will have to work with the City Engineer to determine the best way to build the structure and accommodate flood protection The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit for a 29-32, 4 story loft condominium project with 5800 sq ft of retail space on the first level The proposed building site is a former gas and service station currently housing a Domino's Pizza The site is 1 44 acres Intenor parking for the residential units is on the main level, behind the retail space City code requires that for 29 units 58 parking spaces be provided Twenty-four outside spaces are provided for the retail use Lighting of the outside parking lot will consist of 30 foot high poles with "shoebox" fixtures "Shoebox" fixtures are specified for wall mounted lights for the building Bulbs will be metal halide Building materials will be face brick m brown and tan colors (pnmanly brown), with tan (EFIS) trim The entryway will have a 3-foot overhanging canopy The facade of the building concept is designed with vertical columns approximately every 20 feet, with decorative square man made stone caps topping them off The windows are aluminum clad in "Hartford" green with honzontal muttons with clear glass A sign package for the entire retail space will be required before the spaces are leased out All mechanical equipment will be inside the building, except for the air conditioner generator, which will be installed at the back of the building The Hentage Preservation reviewed the application at their June 4, 2001 meeting and approved it with the conditions below Recommendation Approval as conditioned • Conditions of Approval 1 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 2 Work with City Engineer to ensure maximum flood protection 3 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 4 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 5 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 6 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 7 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 8 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy solid masonry matenal, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and matenals of the project and a detail provided to the Planning Department 9 Fencing, as indicated on the plans, shall protect all trees required to remain on site, or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage dunng construction activity 10 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 11 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 12 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction dunng the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 13 A sign permit shall be required for all project signs 14 Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including directional signs 15 All security lights on building shall be downht and a plan submitted to the Planning Department 16 A sign permit is required for signage 17 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community Development Director Findings The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Memo/Elevation Drawings/Photos/Site Plan/Landscape Plan/Lighting Plan HPC Action 6/4/01 Approval +6-0 with following conditions of approval" 1 Lighting plan be reviewed and approved by the HPC 2 Lighting source be sodium not metal halide 3 Consider space in front of building for pedestrians, i e Benches/landscaping 4 Landscape plan should compliment landscaping of neighbors to the north and south CPC Action on 7/9/01 Applicant requested continuance to the August 13, 2001 Planning Commission meeting • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission June 11, 2001 equipment inside of the apartment units and if there are any roof units, they won't be very large and won't be visible Mr Wald asked if there was sufficient parkmg for the new living spaces Mr Russell noted that while city ordinance requires two parking spaces per condomuuum unit, only one space is required for one bedroom rental umts Mr Gag, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No V/01-24 A vanance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 9 feet requested) for construction of a second story to an existing residence at 113 Bnck St S m the RA, Single Family Residential District John and Jessica Pack, applicants Mr Pack was present He explained the request is to expand the existing one and one-half story house to two full floors Mr Zoller asked is the garage would remain at its existmg location, Mr Pack responded in the affirmative The applicant also stated he would like to use lap siding and shakes rather than stucco, which is on the existing structure Mr Zoller moved approval as conditioned, eliminating the condition regarding color and matenals matching the existing residence to allow for the use of lap siding and shakes Mrs Bealka seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/01-25 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 13 feet requested) for construction of a deck at 424 S Seeley St m the RA, Single Family Residential Distract Justin and Traci O'Bnen, applicants Traci O'Bnen was present She explained the requested deck would be located at the southwest corner of the house and would be no closer to the property line than the existing structure Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Teske, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed 6-0, with Mr Middleton abstaining Case No SUP/DR/01-26 A special use permit for construction of a building housing 29-32 condominiums at 501 N Main St in the CBD, Central Business Distract and the Flood Plain Jeff Wallis, applicant Mr Wallis was present, along with a representative of the applicant's engmeenng firm who explained plans for meeting the Flood Plain requirements The mtent is to make the back wall of the structure thicker and essentially use that wall as part of the levy, Mr Zoller noted the Dock Cafe does that A survey is being completed, and there may be a need for stairs/patio for access to the commercial spaces on the Main Street elevation The applicant has agreed to provide native plant matenal m the open space at the rear of the building and accommodate a trail • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission June 11, 2001 s concept There also has been discussion of roof -top storage to control runoff rates The hope is to have more definitive specs and plans by July Mr Wallis stated plans have been presented to the Heritage Preservation Commission, and he has no problems with the 21 conditions of approval Mr Hultman asked about the proposed shoebox style lighting and asked if the apphcant might consider some more histoncally appropnate style, Mr Wallis noted they will be retuning to the HPC regarding light fixture styles, and he stated they are trying to use a lot of historically appropnate matenals Mr Wallis bnefly reviewed the retail space use, and noted that the HPC has recommended that the Main Street elevation be made more pedestrian friendly, the applicant will be working with the HPC on that concept Mr Middleton asked how the proposal fits mto the Riverway regulations Mr Russell noted Riverway regulations do not apply to the plan, only the Flood Plain and Central Business Distnct regulations are applicable Ron Anderson, 216 W Orleans St , commented on the proposed underground parking and suggested that the applicant might need some infrastructure to keep hydrostatic pressure at a minimum Bobbi Brohard, 919 S Fourth St , asked about the length of the building The building will be 240' across the front elevation Linda Amrein, 307 E Laurel, asked about the cost of the units and spoke about affordable housing needs Mr Wallis noted that is an issue and the applicant is looking at granting sources Ms Amrein also asked about the height, Mr Wallis explained the buildmg needs to be at the maximum allowable height, 50', to make the project work Mr Wald moved to give concept approval as conditioned, with the applicant to work with staff in refining design plans Mrs Bealka seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No CPA/01-01 A Comprehensive Plan amendment changing land use designation of 15 acres of land south of Boutwell Road and west of Boutwell Cemetery from Single Fanuly to Public Facility City of Stillwater, applicant Mr Russell stated the site has been purchased for a pubhc works facility The zorung district sets the performance standards, such as noise levels, landscaping and other requirements Ron Anderson, 216 W Orleans St , asked who would pay for the road improvements Mr Russell noted the street has been annexed to the city and is a potential State Aid Street, also he said improvements are slated in conjunction with the Settler's Glen development Mr Russell said he was not sure of the exact formula regarding the cost sharing of the street improvements, noting n .eRL ILANDIFOR1M O MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX A October 26, 2001 Sue Fitzgerald Community Development City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 RE 501 North Main Street, Stillwater, Minnesota Dear Ms Fitzgerald On behalf of our client, we are pleased to submit this application for design review permit and vanances to allow the proposed retail/residential building at 501 North Main Street The design review permit and special use permit were previously submitted and reviewed by both the Histonc Preservation Committee and the Planning Commission The special use permit was continued indefinitely by the Planning Commission to allow the developer to address a number of design issues The current plan is similar to the plan submitted earlier this year, but we have revised the plans to meet our client's needs and address the issues noted by the City We have summanzed the changes between the current plan and the plan that was submitted on May 25, 2001, as follows 1 A topographic and boundary survey has been completed by Landform and is included in this submission 2 We have completed the title work for the property and found that the total property area is 1 31 acres, not 1 45 acres as onginally noted The title work identified that an 18-foot wide stnp of land adjacent to Main Street is actually owned by MnDOT and is not part of the subject property as was onginally assumed 3 The proposed front yard setback has been reduced from 18 feet to 5 0 feet A vanance is requested for this reduced front yard setback 4 The proposed rear yard setback has been reduced from 20 feet to 10 5 feet for a small comer of the building and the patio exit stairway A vanance is requested for this reduced rear yard setback 5 The building was shifted north approximately 15 feet to accommodate additional parking on the south 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www landform net J Sue Fitzgerald Page 2 Re 501 North Main Street October 26 2001 • 6 The building height has increased from four stones and 50 feet in height to four stones and 53 feet in height to the rooflind and 62 8 feet to the top of the parapet A variance is requested for the increased building height 7 Mechanical units have been relocated to the roof and will be screened 8 The amount of retail space within the building increased from 5,106 square feet to approximately 6,700 square feet 9 The number of condominium units was conceptually planned for 29-32 units in the onginal submittal, we have now shown a total of 29 condominium units 10 The number of enclosed parking stalls has decreased from 59 stalls to 42 stalls This continues to exceed the City requirement that 29 stalls be enclosed 11 The number of surface parking spaces has increased from 24 stalls to 34 stalls This was accomplished by double -loading the parking area 12 The total number of on -site parking spaces has decreased from 83 stalls to 76 stalls A vanance is requested to allow 76 stalls on -site where the ordinance requires 92 stalls for the proposed mix of uses 13 A grading and drainage plan has been prepared and is included in this submittal 14 We are proposing to raise the elevation of the building pad to allow the finished floor elevation to be at 994 5, which is above the 100-year flood elevation 15 A NURP pond was added in the northeast comer of the property in compliance with City, state and federal requirements This was not shown on the previous submittal 16 The grading plan shows that the building pad will be elevated above the 100-year flood plain elevation This would comply with the flood protection ordinance 17 The landscaping plan has been revised to address issues raised by the Planning Commission 18 The lighting plan has been revised 19 A sign plan has been prepared 20 We have eliminated one curb cut onto Main Street (T H 95) as requested by MnDOT 21 The garage door has been eliminated from the front elevation as a result of MnDOT's requirement that one of the existing curb cuts be removed 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www landform net Sue Fitzgerald Page 3 Re 501 North Main Street October 26 2001 • 22 The property area has been reduced, therefore, the green space area has decreased from 37 percent to 26 percent of the lot area 23 A utility plan has been prepared and has been included in this submittal 24 Building floor plans have been prepared and are included in this submittal 25 The building elevations have been revised 26 A new exit stairway is proposed from the first floor patio on the garage roof at the rear of the building Secunty to the patio will be provided by an access keycard system on the secunty door 27 Several building structural changes were made as additional information was received and plans were refined 28 The use of EFIS has been limited on the building elevation as suggested by the City at the previous submittal 29 We are continuing to work with staff to ensure compliance with the City's flood protection plan At this time, we are proposing to construct a floodwall east of the proposed building for flood protection 30 We have added pedestnan connections from Main Street as recommended by the Histonc Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission 31 We have included a connection from the parking lot to the eastem edge of our property to provide a connection to the future City trail planned for the railroad nght- of-way We previously submitted the design review and vanance application forms, $225 00 application fee and the onginal version of this letter and vanance narrative Enclosed you will find copies of the revised vanance narrative and development plans It is my understanding that this item will be scheduled for the Histonc Preservation Commission on November 5, 2001 and Planning Commission on November 13, 2001 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www landform net Sue Fitzgerald Page 4 Re 501 North Main Street October 26 2001 Please call me at 612 638 0225 if you have any questions or would like additional information about our submittal I look forward to working with you A Sincerely, LANDF • RM* Kendra Lindahl, AICP, KL COPY Project File MR01001 ENCL Vanance Narrative Development Plans Landform Engmeenng Company doing business as Landform Engineenng 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www landform net , Variance Narrative We are requesting approval of the following four vanances to allow redevelopment of the property at 501 North Main Street 1 A vanance to allow a 5-foot front yard setback where 15 feet is required, 2 A vanance to allow a 10 5-foot rear yard setback where 20 feet us required, 3 A vanance to provide 76 on -site parking stalls where 92 are required, and 4 A vanance to allow a four-story building that is 53 feet high at the roofline and 62 8 feet high at the top of the parapet where the ordinance limits building height to 50 feet The vanances are required to redevelop this small, polluted former gas station site With a redevelopment site, it is difficult to meet current ordinance standards, as the property was subdivided under a different set of standards than exists today Approval of the requested vanances provides an opportunity for redevelopment of a site that is known to be polluted by a former gas station Vanances would be required for any redevelopment of the site, due to the site constraints, but we have tned to minimize the extent and impact of the four requested vanances The requested vanances meet the three vanance standards as follows 1 A hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists Personal, family or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a vanance The requested vanances are required to eliminate the unique hardships caused by the floodplain issues, shallow lot depth, relatively small commercial lot, poor soils and contaminated soils located on this property The proposed vanances are required in order to allow redevelopment of the site This shallow parcel is only 138 deep on the north side of the property We have tried to minimize the need for vanances, but vanances are required in order to redevelop the lot The additional 18 feet of MnDOT property adjacent to the Main Street (T H 95) nght-of-way appears to part of this property, therefore, the reduced front yard setback would not be noticeable from the adjacent properties The rear yard setback is required for the exit stairway on the rear of the building and would be separated from adjacent properties by the railroad nght-of-way and, therefore, would not be noticeable from surrounding properties 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www Iandfonn net Re 501 North Main Street October 26 2001 • Although the proposed building is only four stones high, as permitted in the Zoning Ordinance, the design of the building results in a total building height of 53 feet and 62 8 feet to the top of the'building parapet The hardship is caused by the Zoning Ordinance, which has both a maximum number of building stones and a maximum building height While our building would be only four stones, the total building height is slightly more than the ordinance standard because of the building code requirements, mechanical equipment design requirements and the requirements of today's consumer The size of the lot, the floodplain requirements and the ordinance requirements create hardships that limit the developer's ability to provide parking in compliance with ordinance standards One of the challenges of developing in histonc communities, like Stillwater, is that the lots were platted pnor to the nse of the Amencan automobile Consequently, the lot was platted without regard to the need for auto parking The poor soils and floodplain restnctions prohibit the developer from providing underground parking and the size of the site limits the amount of surface parking that can be accommodated The ordinance requires 58 parking spaces for the residential portion of the building and 34 spaces for the retail portion of the property We are proposing to provide a total of 76 parking spaces on this site, which we believe is adequate for the mix of uses The residents would have 39 indoor parking spaces available for the 29 condominium units and shared use of the surface parking The 34 surface parking spaces would generally be available for the retail users dunng the day, while many of the condominium owners are away from home The demand for retail parking spaces will be less in the evening when the condominium residents and guest will create a higher parking demand 2 A vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts, and, if granted would not constitute a special pnvilege not enjoyed by neighbors The setback and building vanances are required to allow the property owner to develop this property in a manner that is consistent with the City zoning map and the surrounding development The vanances would allow redevelopment of this currently underutilized site The parking vanance would allow the developer to improve the property consistent with other development in downtown Stillwater Given that the existing lot is small, it difficult to provide an economically viable project and provide the number of parking stalls generally required by the zoning ordinance However, we have provided a mix of uses that would be complementary and would allow shared parking 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www landform net Re 501 North Main Street October 26 2001 3 The authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and will not matenally impair the purpose and intent of this section or the public interest nor adversely affect the comprehensive plan The requested vanances would not be a detnment to the adjacent property, nor would they matenally impair the purpose or intent of the Zoning Ordinance or other city policies and requirements Furthermore, redevelopment of the property would allow attractive reuse of a currently underutilized property The proposed mix of retail and residential uses would improve the appearance of the property and would be an improvement for this area of Stillwater The requested vanances would not be immediately recognizable to a passerby, but the improvement to the property would be an asset to the neighborhood and the City of Stillwater at - large Furthermore, the vanances would not negatively affect adjacent properties, because Main Street (TH 95) separates the subject property from the properties on the west and the abandoned railroad property separates the subject properties from the Dock Cafe and the St Croix River 650 BUTLER NORTH BUILDING 510 FIRST AVENUE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 OFFICE 612 252 9070 FAX 612 252 9077 www Iandform net ®AREA LOCATION MAP SeALE 501 NO2IINNESOTA TH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, ;:_ 4 I Me ABBREVIATIONS & O tooAA YR. AA AD IDOL A0.1 AW AL Ault AAPHO L ARCH ALTO AVC Orr BIDE CB0F'T CPS. DC C.L Cl. DELI CD CDt CY CB LUNAR CML LTV LP COWL CCOPTT LENTIL COP oS CEC CUD CRL CEPT DN Ed E VS EL ELEV AFX ACE. EC ECTE Had MA T EST ETD FYI FDD 1.0 FD FD FAC FB HMO FOLD FON FES F91 ▪ OR ( ) CA COAL CALV 00 0 CR NP EUPEP ECT NORM NVAC O oe IRO ( ) FL hJ 100 Ye Hod Erma Ads 00A Aral Dos Ar CC0.2 3 Le Adoda Pada Move Mamma AaON clA/ MAduawd Araq themee Bawd Wm Beene Fkar F.rsa Thee (bee) Mho nee • Pe C.d. Feet Per S®d Caner O.ed Coed Jee Gee ease We w▪ . Cleat Cups O f e+es Le Yea Cad Ben Cad Move Cd. Roo `� DPP. Ce sem Come Cease O6e �3 Posse Deus Orem Thee Olean Doe Is Pp Doe Lee Etta Tease Joe Ewer eons Dade Nee Neel Eleven looMeT E:ns Fad Eves E°oKka [goL, Feb el had felled by Ohr Favor Ceh Floor Ons Fee D.psesn Caere Fe l Ve0 FTO Ores Fa Bases We Oa Pei Seel Loa Out Fed Ed Sea Feabd Pe nee Par Fen Cede e.aa Coe Cetrsar Gad CWmd Cues Far TL.vo CI® Ne n Ele Pont e ased Nab Pao P0_ Pp The Honed Nems Vonem Ar Cmaeas lode Dee been brae.* et Bee NV JT LF 18 LOd LONG LT HART 1113 FAIL MAL PTA rra. n1 nom "5.. El1L NO OR / N1S NWE NEIL 0D OE. OPEL Oi OPNG 05C PC PL PEI PL. OR P/L DD PSF PT PT PVL PVL PVT PE POD PERT - PREP PROD. PROP FVC PVr1T QTR. OTT RAD RD RE RD RP RCP RFIP REED REV RGU eft Pry sSAAN SECT Mae SEWO SLAT SENT SPEC 50. SIEN SID WHET 3yn T/C Tra M. TYP UN.0 VB. VL JP VEIL � t WPT WWF WOO VEIL V5 m YR S ee ▪ n Bee Jos Lel Poet La Pun / Lepd Thee Pad Leal Careen Us Weed M�v • L Red e el need Mean Pereete ./ rbel. Madero Mole Dees Of Tespuaaa Mee /Mode MOs 00 NOR er Cowes 00 Na to Se Noel Wooer EYraa Ned Van tavel O. Cane Onssr C>.emi Mahe liars Oared Odere Nh Woe Lend r Pale el Cease Pan N oeara Pan tee Lea P P/I PngvaPod or Iw Vaer Aar Foot Paeb Pe Sege ba Pe N loss Pee N Vase. Cesar Pea or ere kewew Pat N Vaal Tree =1"7 Peeve Puree Pease Peen Peed Poly-V (Fed 5* CloanT Rohn Roe EarRemo Ae 20* Ewe Raie be Rem Reece Pp• Rae} Sim Gavel Reed Re Rayed �/ Rove/ ftreen.Corarea u. Se• e Fe Seery Sas 9sw 9ele Ee Se Ea We Da Sae See SMakatm See Ste Am Meet Seeded St eeod Speed e Ta ar Caee ;ter Tif.Vol The / Toem. 1.2* Wee Need Mere Vapor Bra Toned O.r Vd h Feld erf Veraed Venble Wel Warta Pas Wale We Fdes Weh WUae Wok Oa Wee Woe Se OR LANDSCAPE SYMBOLS SYrea. Df9dNIGN o cv DEO:VO S TREE CO0EROD RER EDCNC LMOSCAPE !CULLERS SPELLS AfINAVMTEIN DRAWING SYMBOLS "(FOOL DE9CaPia! ®SITE SYMBOLS ENST*C NEW NOTE REfER0L:E PARSNG STALL COWT LARGE SHEET DUAL COORDINATE PONY EEVEION - ADODULLE N, ETC REVRO AREA (Me BAR) OESERPTEN 1 L ' b 0 I� 5 CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATES! MADNC CANOPY / OVERHANG 11DER44OF0 9TPLCI1RE RAL.ROM Ie y I CO :ROTE C0CRETE ODD EDGE CP PAVErENT Las .LOPE SECTS! tom— FENCNC GUARD RAL FETAMC WALL BCUDER/ RALLAR WALL S0. OOZED ▪ 000RWAY e.0 UM STAMPED TRAFFIC SCR ee POWER POLE BOLLARD ®EROSION CONTROL SYMBOLSEEMENS DESCRIPTION cB L_ SFDFENT CONTROL FENCE (51.0A1) SEMEN CONTROL FENCE (HEAVY DUTY) TEMPORARY SERVO PROTECTION REMIUTILITY SYMBOLS SYTT50. DE5COP1aN — EEC DEL 0-C--- -TEL Y W — —/iTIWC CRS - 7F09— =1.04 STORM SEWER SA.TARY SEWER WASTE FORCE NAN ROOF GRAN SYSTEM WATERMAN FEE LEE (F SEPARATE) FRE DFPARTI2NT COOECTION DOESTIC WAT22 SERVICE CLVERT & EED SECTION CAS LEE S0. SIRRAN MECTRC-0VERNEAO ELECTED -UN ERCROID TETE000-0VEMEAO TElEPOG E1l0ERC40)0 4WN SP0EIER SLEEVE WELL WATER PARE -ID COMENT1ER W TER CONDENSER WATER APPLY CODG6CR WATER RERJRN HEC 0. SWAY f Ei OL ENT SURVEY SYMBOLS • MOTES FOIAO ROA MONAENT + CVARD POST ▪ SAGA • MUTT POE • 18TER GUT WE 0 STREET LENT nL® TE4EP101 vox 0 SNITARY 301*00 112400E O CATCH USN O STORM serve MAHOt IM GATE VALVE je( FRE HYDRANT O VOTER MANtlI0 OVEEIEAR LJTNTY 0ES LAOERGROIID ELECTRIC -ae - LFCERTRO tO TE1EPK E a002=040 LAS c.V 120f402O10 CA0.t/TV L.o UFDEROtpM FORE OPEC WATERMAN SANTARY SEWER sn 5TOR11 SEWER LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE SLEET CLI SITE MAP ERODESIGN CONTACTS recce 0Aea. SERVICE COMPANY CONTACT PHONE an. ENC1FtR COT OF 511/WATER ELATION ecues Lb (651).30-583 FR0.ECT 0ICYIER WLUA11 d. (02)628-1905 A 053110T A0OITECTS PRJ.01 a (RS2)070-6007 PROEC1 LAOF001 .EFP d. (62)252-9070 LANDSCAPE AR011ECT MCDOE41.. RLA a (60)252-9077 PRO.ECT LAPOPOS 1 DAN aY (610252,1070 art. ENOEER N0lE9 ELT a (60)252-90P/ UTILITY CONTACTS SERVICE COMPANY CONTACT PHONE ELECTRIC 1LT1. MEEV Or/ GRANT 1.5 (651)7'3125 CAS YCEL EFERCT BRIAN rELLOW le (651)779-366 TMERLOE/ FIER DP1IC OWEST SCOTT CRESEACE Lek (01I)730 061 CAB. IV/ FEES OPTIC AT&T OROADBAM TOT POET ale (6E1)193/5.63 WATER 9AN6ART SEWER STORM SEWER OTT OF STLLWAT*R [LAYTON ECE1E9 a& (651)630-003I 01) CALL OEPORE YOU POI Gopher State One CaII MIN CS, AREA 651 ba-Odin TOLL FREE. 1 000 251 K6 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JEST WAILS 210 EAST TOTH STREET stint 250 SAM PAUL. MINNFSOTA 55101 TT 0511261-tr® FATBERRLA® CITY SHEET OIDET( tticzt EFEppop22 OVL n A>s .mTrr rmaoi contra 10:02•ELT YETI OWE IONLEFEIE LUTE EAT RE 14001 PLOW sOTc FLOOR FLAN ERE FLAN RE11910N HL5IDRY NANO MEN 00.Zcr° Q�ty e PROJECT MANAGER REVIBV er DOT =EMI antrocATION .yew yeeeereemers revue sr r. a Ko�ae�e ��� spea w ..ter PAT! TETE1 Tynan i+'1�Eea. r~W rs CITY SUBMITTAL OCTODER 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX SE EMI A**Ndk IldE eYap..b..0 Iaegl, el Nola ONIMEMOSII YE Fr a baa Pea IEEE... WLH peaa0Q.N1. MET CO STMN N1.124161.13d Innvlavikrnuut FILE NAME COODAROWNG PROJECT NO. IAEOIODI PREUMINARY CIVIL TITLE SHEET C0.1 • • Ar MANE faI !NNW* OF Tit OF N RELWATER A9 WORN Cal MRON9 SWARD" / PLRFPLTED PLAT OF TIE OTT CP / 9ILLWAOER DATED MAT 21. C74 • QOLIAL 9.OR1iJN9 OF 1IE OTT OF �l 51LWA1FR A3 9tl6N ON 11TROA / 9K0265 PERFECTED PLAT Cc- 11E CITY OF 311WAIPR DARED ENT 2t lel0. / 697 \ a• \\) \ \ 0 \ P. i i • ,f �� r e 8 GP' . i I I I I 'I I' R IR OP PPE fie EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION An that pert f Trot 2 as hacr6ed on Cent of Tele Nmber 65 oc ddnated upon he sap weed Edo 8 toted horn as the scat +carded h rr f th Roeder of T Ica 0 dot par f Reinter d Lad Sue y Number 28 on fie sad 0ffc f the Roeder of T les and all hat pat f anted Nash Water Street di Washed at Can y Mnesotet dorbed m fdbr. Cowman Je rneratcton of la Es erly cat f flan Streit and he Nertherty In of Lard Street as dean on de no of he wand on no City of S&Os or os mended by Myra Shepard Perverted Par of the C y of S R er da ed May 2L 187er thew Nor h 08 decrees 36 outs 08 seconds En mord beorna Ong sad Ees any Ind Ma. Sus 4800 f n hence South 81 deep s 23 mutes 52 second Es 18 00 fen. dery South 08 degrees 36 mot 08 seconds W pero0rl el. sad Easterly Me of fan Street 35L17 ran the posn r boons d3M parcel bead desrbeeb thec monad South 08 decree 36 men 08 records Ws 8688 f n nor sr Ins, the er0nen vah Inc rat parallel end de of 400 feet Seuthsterly (when meowed at d oodles) f ca Lh ...be or the We- an Ir eel across sad to,.. located ocr sad tract pro- December L 1935 hoc Northm sly do a. of 23 27 fee dud sond p.rdld ha on no women are anew the Nonhes hovel rodeo f 529.00 fee entrd r wye of 2 doge s 31 eons L9 seconds and chard of sod are bear North 52 deg s 02 erns 32 seconds Es the porn f necton vnA Or tram reread bed cod do a. 3400 fen Em Ely (Amen road m non nabs) f ca rod Easterly In f Mon Str et and p to of mono= boa tin Nor4hvexeiy caner of sad Ron reed Land SET y Weber 28. thew Sank 08 degree 36 mutes 08 seconds Wert rat neat sod on dad the Westerly In of sod Rage and Lad Survey Nudes 28 don....' of 253 10 fen he Nrtlnesteely caner of the Southerly 7 00 red f sari Rego eyed Lad Sry y Number 2& Mary South 81 decrees 23 rots 52 scrods Es along h Northerly In of sad Southerly 7 00 fen ad .0 Em erly p' Jew en 206 99 fen. thew Nor holy des Mee of 7648 f oleo can-Laeernd nes Loco to he East. h s4 rode.* or 2415% f anon aeon f 1 deg 48 runs 51 seconds and tte chord of sad cue bear North 08 dor s 07 manes 29 sends West. these North 07 degrees 13 dens 04 scuds Wes dad organ 12303 feet der. Nrthedy boon of 134.67 fen doe domed are moo the East, horn redo of 1,I0445 fen ad astral aye of 6 der es 57 nuts r7 needs the etenenon rah be etch bens South 81 decrees 23 ends 52 seconds Em fro the porn of bonnet dose North 81 decrees 23 o ne 52 scuds Wes along sod den no nod sad tore 138 67 f et the part f beyond floe per of T Lot A dnrhed briar iron A Then par or Tort No 2 en docrMd Book 1 f Rego or of ides at pays 48 as he sane on ff he ff of he County Recorder ad for W deacon Camay MnNsota, described as follows Bonen at de pun f inersectm of the Es hr f North Mon 5ueet as dam on the plat of the Orgnl T va doe C y of 9 firmer eh but no wand nth and deem 9 Res SouthstMy (rhea neon d m rein miles) fro the caner 6m of the spur ran boned cars sad tract par to October L 143S Ma rat NvJrsteiy along sad 9 foot prdkl lass to as terse e .ten nth be arparallel nth nandantdes n 34 fen s moored Eerly (rheas et min Odle) f ca Jon Es E. d sod Nrdh Mon St en here run Southerly p0r0E6 h the Es In or sad North Mon Su for de one of 100 fee then canes 9outhely 0 aht be along and Ica 601060d Corse to he En erly Ins f sod North Mon St et then+ no Nordarly nag sad En Scar o the port of begone A woad by Myron Sherd Perfected Plat f the C y of St/rutr dated flay 21. 1878 The eel her herd tee erects dewed by Cent or 1 1 No 34900 Wheh he Easterly of Lev I desrbed bent. Lem t Envying at the pant f mmenen of he Nor h Poe of T act A hero before destrbed rah to ran parallel rah and de cat 18 f eon erly r On East der or sad North Hon 5t et thence rat Southerly along sod parallel he Or 320 fen thence no Southerly t h Saud air of sod T oc A and then e ,ntrn Whim hs Nethely of the taboo descrbed o to-.._ Benno at Judea! LadrL named at h Neth..es eriy corer f th Southerly 700 fee of Regnered Lad Sr y No 28 Wades on Can y M nrson% od Jaded Laodevrk b ro th pan of began f he In been de erne? ere Wes sly along Wes erly proxntn of he Nor hey 1st f sod Southerly 7 00 fee draw of 16.01 f n .or or less t ash menenm rah hr dram proOd rah ad 1800 fee. Es sly of the Easterly Or of Nord. Mon St set as shorn on do plat f the Orroal Teen, nerd Coy of Sander Wod.4tm Canny Morena eel and be lefe Emote ®CERTIFICATION 1 he by emery Co.rmvedth Lad Tel h0emce Co -troy and Hondo Mnae.ent LLC that the true and omen. car y of (see Inn dscrptra as Bern on survey) ad correctly hors the lac Lon f ell er ee Onion ad tors and rproveaent on sad property Lit there or no odic saroectom1s onto o6Jo.my propert treats or alleys by 0y of de nd e4 beams true area or nprovenmis, der re ne webs y.-o(-voy or semen m sad desrb.d property other dot do.m therms and der re no de y alb or obi .hwodme.l war sad deacrb.d property by bolded true -ores or ono- orov rent faun .d en adjone property pt of show on fad war y DATE 9-28-01 DAI$ L MOMS 1AED TOR R.E9af LICENSE NO 25718 910VET ARLO POOL COREIED ANE 0. 7001 ®AREA SUMMARY TOTAL PARCEL AREA 5739A ULNAE FEET OR L3 AO2E-9 ®NOTES L MARK! ARE WA9Nl:TON warn COOAONMTE SYSTEM (NAP 83) 2 UL11ES 910. ARE FROM FEW rEA9 REMMT3 A.D AS -al PLAN MTARRO FROM TIE CDY OF Sue' 11R. OTNER n0ERCROM2 VR10E9 ENT EXIST TINT ARE NOT SOWN COe04EALTN tenant er Tea Lw00rr errear. Don. JAy 23 2001 a B kn. e0Ml7ENt Ib 0449 ®FLOOD ZONE TIE ENTRE SITE FAILS W101 008E AO PER FLOOD M ANCE RATE MAD C16U011y PANEL ram 273249 0003 C DATED FED L 1994 BASE 8000 HE Ann AMOR 64.3 BEY OSINERIDEVELOPER 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JfFF WAIIJS 210 EAST TERM STREET 9117E 250 SAINT PAUI.MINNESOTA 55101 cam DB-®r a®1$1-0333 CITY SNEET 70600 .nor nor11 eve oar WU MEG mw.in ▪ 31343•Mer LOOM PLAN AO Mat Kna OLYPI • MOM Ilan AS OAMINTAS REVISION HISTORY one rasa ems PROUELT MANAGER REE®Y es AMA Only ems CERT6YAT10N CITY SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota AIL LANDFORM MINNEAPOL IS PHOENIX InlarAeNmt orer.g 9044 h.WmraYay Ye CO !mines Yeae0.0 m.ni.1,m..lwmm NeattATMIS Inss eomemn ewre31031M31 p Fseyaimn Pst124941155 NO. 4 RTH WrrlaflLaRreY RLE NAME C1012A2011704 P ROJECT NO 14OI001 0 20 40 i905TIN000IWmONS PLAN SCALE IN FEET C 1 . 1 NeeNerniai • • 06WN. SNOFHJE OF THE CN OF STLLW TER A, SNWN ON FITRON9 1149M[05 PERFECTED PLAT OF HE CW CP 501I TER 0 E0 MN 2L 078 • FEET & MATCH HOMNG CON0ETE SSCRIM% PROTECT EASING PL6V TE U1EN t SIHCIIRE M 9TE LCNG (TTP) STOE WALK. EE & 11ATCN HOSING CONCRETE CURBMO CUTTER O FEET A MATCH EIES NG CONCRETE CURB NV CUTTER m STONE WALE 4E OE141UL SNORELIEE OF 1O1TT OF — a/ 51LLW TER AS SHOWN ON n RONS ffiBE/ 51EPA9 PERFECTED Pl OF E LL CTT OF SIE2 0 TEO RA 7) B7B / ESI 23 5 £ 222 99 / .7 I"I gRK I DESCI-I 1100112E E1TANNC WALL WNM RAEFC 6 n TIME ®NOTES BAG8/Sq►V P4. 56.TON TAKEN FE011 BOAOMT MO TOF00'APHT SULVET PERFORM) BY LANOF0 1 ENCEEE2NC COI1MT 19FEAWI5, 11NESOIA ON JIM 4 2001 EARESSLT FOR 06 8EOECT ACCOITNL U71.61 NFODIATF8N 910V1WAS PROMO BY 0711 OF FR/WATER 114E10TA A}blil 02AWNP5. UR= LOCA108 NO ELEVATIONS TO BE FE1D VFJSEO P6pt TO EXCAVATRN/C08Tg6CIg1 F ANT 05010CES A6E 4DR0 THE EEiEER 9OLAD LE FSEDIAIELT N01FF9 FOR EEILWIWt 2 OFENS015 SOWN ON rib PLAN ARE TO FMB OP CUB MO ESTE t AEE OF BUDNC LINOS ACTED OTHERWISE IPAAit WAILS TO BE STRPFD TAM WE TARE PANTED STRPE NANOCAP ACCE$ ABLES 0 BE PANTED WI14 WOE WNIE ANTED 91EPE IB' 00 AAR 1 45 DECREE N102.9 TO STALL 11E CLAMENT OCTAL HE W1404 CAN BE 00T4ED HEM THE ONQ2S.R• TO BE USED FOR ALL C08TR CTR1 STARC AO'IMN[S. F ANT 0602S:PAFILE5 BETWEEN THESE PLANS NO 11E DOTAL MS EXIST MOTET *E0EE2 69EOIATELT FOR RE50.V1I04 BE BLAZER FOOT8@N AS 94701 ON T16 PLAN. ATO ON BE OQTK FEE 9HTAU. BE COPARED TO TIE FNAL STRUCTURAL PLANS 91YRE0 BY TIE CONTRACTOR MDR 10 STAB6IG ARMIES. 5. BED COKSEIE 020 NO CUTTER B PROPOSED FOR IRRO1ID4f0O 116 RP0.LCT U4E55 NOTED OIICRWBE FEET A/O MA104 6N6ING CONCRETE ORB MO CUTTER. NO 6 PEOVOE 10 TRANSOM TO PROP090 BED ONES NO OX1ER F 6EC135N2T PARKING SUMMARY FEONEO PAR I N0 OE STALL PER 200 SE GE EE1AE. SPACE TWO STALLS PER 111T OF LAIC SPACE NM6CAP STALLS 10 FA 60 EA. 4 EA. TOTAL. PARENC STALLS EEOUREO 94 EA. PROVIDED PAFBUNC STANOA➢D STALLS (9'8) MAOLICM STALLS (9.19) HANDICAP STALLS (940) 77 EA 2 FA 2 EA. 101K PAPAW STALLS PEOYDED 76 6A ®AREA SUMMARY BIFFACE AREA (SOFT) ARF_A (AC) OULDNG 0439 SF 14410 5F 20407 SF 0.3 ACRES 034 AC7E5 0.66 ACS9 24 0% 26.0% 90.01E TOTAL 57254 SF UI ACRES ® DENOTES CREEK SPACE (LA,05CNE AREA) 00 0A ZONING SUMMARY TIE PROPERTY B 7000 CENTRAL Bu9Fs5 00 OCT MEOW SETBACK. 6FOg1A10+ 0 A5 Mims FRONT A20 0 REAR TAB) 20 FT WE APO 20 FT COMBED 50E PARKER SETBACK. NF00V110N 5 AS TOURS FRONT TARO 1 FT REM TWO 10 FT 50E TA® IO FT �O�Tma a4.o=_ NORTH 0 20 40 flinonimini SCALE IN FEET OWMERAXVIE OPER 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JEFF WALLIS 210 EAST TENTH STREET SUITE TO SAINT PAIR, AMOIEWFA 55101 TMENDIMISKI F 123I251.00J6 arr4ggi. SK EETECU 0137 f0F rnN iallc�mOm0m 0.01 w®1FM111F RMI canna 311 •1111.114111.1 'DMZ MO/ mcve ww MMF BM� MOT 01:011 MAN WOO ROM 001 11.11/0170 REY510N KISMET 90311 /14431 03011 PROJECT MANAGER RENEW In AMA CFRTO•ICJLTON Imo. tie.e.A.,_F,.... .._.,-- rr .e... —.�os.".e'r.r Sodom IL kimlea A olobs w 1101111 CITY SUBMITTAL 0CTOBER 26 2001 EM ELT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota �l� LANDFORM M INNEAPOL IS PHOEN IX 610PLYAsa rd1 46171190310600. FstRm Bttq 11RA6.R P014•=60006,141p 4W _154m1N0 NWsq*EOL4 M0es61304010 11m034334151 Fs011141717 Ps14064419 41s6Jt ETKITo IN FILE NMI CI011IX0I17IK PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY SITE RAN C2 1 NOTES SEE SPEOHCATOS FOR AODNWAL 4EOLREIENTS I. BACKMAN, 6F001ATON TAKEN ROM BOLDARY ND TOGOC APHY SURVEY PERFOSEO BY LAN:FORT EK EERAIC COVANY INFAG018. 1E1F5OTA ON JAE 13. 2001 EXPESSELY FOE TF1 PROJECT ADDITIONAL UAITY NPO@1AT10N 9004 rA9 Rama, BY CRY OP stun MR. ',BESOT AS-8AT ORAYNGS. Miff LOCATOS AM ELEVAT1046 TO BE FELD VEINED PRI04 TO EXLAV T01/CQBTELC110N F NR OBCREPANCE9 ARE 1D1E0 THE ENOEER 900LD BE TTEOUIELY WOWED FOR RESOLUTION. 2 PROPOSED NOT E1EVAI00S SOWN AT CIRd1ES ARE HA11E FJ.E AT1O8 LNEs9 WC TED Oi1FRNSE ]PANG SECTiaa BITV3JC16 P V6C (STANDA®) LS BMUFOTS HEAR ,MOOT TYPE A4 CO (T*DOT 2357) LS' BNURDUS BASE (MOOT TYPE 31) 6' CLASS 9 AGGREGATE BASE (1.001 913B) COIPACRO 9022ADE I= 1 mOr0OS P vNC (IEAVY OITT) 7 OtVTOTS YEAR ON001 TYPE 11) TACK CO T OIDOT 2357) 2' MEWLS BASE (MOOT TYPE 30 104 0A99 9 ARSLGAR OA10* 01 300) =MAL ED 9SCRA6E COLT✓f1E VAUEVAYS 4 CONCRETE WALL 6'1 6 6O WTI V FRE ACCQECATE BASE (MOOT 31441520) C09ACTFD 91SCRAOE 1 CONCRETE con APRONS/ NO 9.803 B CONL7&1E SLAB- /1 REAR Al E 0C C CLAY 5 AGGREGATE BASE (/D01 SOB) COIVACTCO 9SGRAOE 4 REFER TO EICOITE10A11OS N 1FE CEOTEO*CN. WORT FOR ANY A00102N1L 91E PREPARATION FFCRINI2I OR RQHlf is. 5. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT CATCH BLRS O1 1H0 PLAN 00 TOT REELECT T COSMIC HUT AND ACTUAL QT ILE A/008. SEE 9EET CIA FOR ACTUAL RH ELEV TOG. 6. PROTECT ALL 9AFACY 91E FE 1U RES NOT NOTED FOR REPTCNAL 7 E69TNC TREES TO BE FOR REMOVED SHALL BE REMOVE° N TIER ENIRETT NCUDLC ROOT STRL ELRES. AID PEEWEE, FROM 91E. NO CEEAPJC EFFORTS 934E BE STARTE0 Wna211 TIE CAREFM COORIT A101 r/ 116 00E65 REPRESENTATIVE TO 11AR TRY 10 BE SANO/EEFICNE0 B 11E FL/ SOLS SNOLLD BE RLALE0 At0 CO0ACTED USNG LET 114114ESA9 WICY1 ARE COVARABL.Y IIATCMO TO 11E TYPE OF NL AND THE COVACTO2 BENC USED THE CO19ACT7R SNOJD BE CAPABLE GP MIMING TIE RECOTEIDFD CO 166110 LEVELS 11R0001R TIE 14113E 114O0E19 OF THE FIL IF1 4 11E CONTRACTOR 9111 INSTALL AT 61162 MIR TO COTENL/6 CRAONC MINIMS AN1 SHILL MNITAN SAD FENCE FOR DURAT01 OF CQEIRUC101 ACTMTF9 U+ON ESTASWENT OF TURF 1FE CONTRACTOR SHALL RITOYE Si FENCE MD OSP09E OFFSITE 10 11E POD SHALL FIE EXCAVATED AS EARLY N THE COBi4UC110N PROCESS AS POSSE F PRIMO BY THE ENCr4(R. ENE CONTRACTOR 9UA1 REMOVE THE AT FROM THE POD AFTER 11RP B ESTAHHE0 N 11E MROECT LL AFTER LRApC S CO9ILTE TIE CONTRACTOR 9W.L 6STALL AT FORE, ROCK QES AHD STRAY BALES AS 9N0,51 ON NE PLAN TO I914E EROSION Q 11E CONTRACTOR WALL L011 10 ACI011E9 1O THE CEADNC Ll5T9 910,04 OJ 1FE CRD6C PLAN ALL CO611B1C701 AC1N1R9 SHALL CORM riM LOCAL OZRMILE Ll 11E CONTRACTOR 95411 9OEOLLE FS C0ERA100 TO PERM NE 11BIIR0ED AREA AT ANY CNN TIE ALL OBRRHD 10L1-STREET AREAS MALL BE RE3TORO WITH 4 Of 10P501.. AID SEED OR SOD AS SNOW ON 1FE LNOSCAFE FLAWS VRH1 72 NUR! of CO6IE101 OF 50.6 1C ACIMTY N THAT PARTICULAR AREA NORTH nirelem0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JETF WAWS 210 EAST TENTH SWEET SUITE TO SAINTPAUI, MIII`)ESUFA 55101 70191067♦551 P FM 913m COY SHEET WES SLIT Cal OIL ROL. SOH ell IOROI. Romano PLOI l®lMt1 SO MAO 0.1 1OLLreX ®1N1 =MOM R10I2. • IRELOOOT MR® v1PfHHa .w WOO FLOM PLAY NO MIST FLOOR ILAN • OFNP ROR RAY AR ORO FLOOR PLY ▪ 6.10/0400 REVISION HISTORY Itr MINN lick8 .ozie Qp4ffr P ROJECT MANAGER REYI0N ▪ lb. CERTIFICADON Roo MOW O...rAr s Affitg...e.. INN CITY' SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota AIL LANDFORM MINNEAPOL IS PHOENIX 1NwIAm1N1L 0.1.60910001.1611.030 N mltrHmmHm Fs11sm®1 tifUi117/7 1101.I3104-rr1L 141 10BOOS HHNNm Rm.AAL1101 Nrr J(r0111N wrJNHImmUW FILE NAME 00I1AROIDIAG PROJECT NO ►SOIC/01 PRELIMINARY GRADING RAN C3 1 NOTES • • C000NA TO • CB 1 ..6 NV.T68767 NVe6B] CITY of IPI�•ta 5.41 T/C 6900 W 6O323 R-1612 LADING 40 0A 6-0• PVC 00.51C EXTEND EASING D• SANRART SEWER 516 A5 SHOWN II MARK DEScN 1 5 COORDNATE VON AT&T •• 0 VERFY LOCATION A1V R0/TE TO foe PPE Re1 V 68 W PFE -66 90 L BAOLGtO.V IFOOTATON TAKEN F001 00.11VARY AID TWOGtARHT SIRVET PERFORM, 6T LAN/FORM EACFEERIC COPANT ISEENFOL6, IN050TA. ON NE 0. 2001 EXPRE59.T FOR 11.6 PRO.ECT ADOMONAL Lawry 1lD01ATIDI SHOWN IRAs PROVDEO DT COY OF STLLVATER r0EE30T5 S--0LLi GRAVR3. USNTT LOC 1DN6 TO BE FED VERFW PRIOR TO ETC NATION/COPD11UC1I011 F ANT 015021PANCEI ARE NOTED TIE f?ION£4 SCUD 6E ITEONTEL WIELD FOR RESOLUTION OMAR 75 COmut ON ALL NEW V 1E01NL 1 PPE IbLI2B SWATS ME 7EA1RFD FR4N CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF 51RULTRE 02 END OF HARED END SECTION. PPE MATERIALS WATER AN SAN SEVER a0F cam 5T001 SEVER 0P GLASS 52 Pvc SIR 95 PVC SCR 26 RCP CLASS 5 4£ ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN FOR AOOTDIVL STE ELECTRCAL FFO0IATDN 5. ALL CIXNS0A6 10 OTT MUTES TO ES N ACCORDANCE VON OTT OF STLLVAIE4 STMONDS. 6 COMMIE NTH rE11ANECM ORA`N1S FOR EXACT LOCATIONS 0 57470E CONE:CW.15 ANO CONMI5T1N OF SERVICES MINN SAME 7 ADJ6T MI STRUCTURES RAUL AND ORNATE, TO PROPOSED MACES WERE RSTUUTx0 C0PL1 WITH ALL REG.0b6TS OF MUTT CLEWS. 5116C11RES KW RESET TO PAVED AREAS TO 7PET OINE:R9 RECLIREFENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOACNC E VERFT ALL CQ+EC1D16 TO E STIK MUTT SERVICES PRIOR TO C06TIOC1gL 4 COORONAIE 517E ROGATION COTTRALTOR 10 PROLIX 4 50700.1E 40 PVC LAVN SPINIER SLEEVES AS RE61RED 10 CONTACT CORNER ONE FOR EXOTIC MUTT 10C 110E PaOR TO C66TOCIp1 ANT p6CREMRCE9 BETVEW LOCATED UTUTFS ANT NNE EX0EL C0 TNION PLAN 91AD RE N71FD AND FORWARDED TO TIE ENCK:EL IDSPRNOFR STSTFt1 TO BE SOLO MEOIMLT F401 6 CQTERGAL SERVICE UTILITY CONTACTS SERVICE COMPANY CONTACT PHONE EIECTOC XCEL EFERCT aJ GRANT Ib (6517/9-905 CAD WEE HFRLT 60AN I E110V r (651779 966 TELERIONE/ PEER OPTIC ORES 5C Le.(651)790-1%I CABLE TV/ FRIER WIC A & m0A005M T6A DUET ed. (651)499-5565 VA1ER. 5AI(TART SEVER ST001 %%ER OTT OF STUN/ATER RATTON E0U9 eb (630490-0691 CALL BEFORE TOU 91cd Gopher State One Call TUN CT' AREA. 651-484 0007 T01 FREE 606 D] 1166 NORTH O 20 40 VU SCALE IN FEET OVIMER/DEVELOPER 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JEFF WAILIS 210 EAST TENNI STREET 51117E Ed SAINT PAIR, MIIVESOTA 5101 mEa RD. PAT6S1`5F6135 CITY SHEET I NCE( oV PaN Gt CITY fH1 Cr PmIMeT 24 111N • 111111.116. VBm NAY ooN�eM1 ROM RAM • 111.010100 R151510N I0510RY PIM MIME OMNI PROJECT MANAGER REVIEW ▪ .11.1111 CFR1V'T ATION ASIs.;m �Trn a60 .te r Y•• •••_ ew NOD )10:60 CITY SUBMITTAL 0CTOBER 26 2001 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota ettIL LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX 0001.1 01A0d.004S9 N.q1TN NP8010 Ron N&>m1OCI P0067aOO NmN»mTRNL OIAM PO Pus 14 USR�e1A1Y90 Nn0@00N0 IeORBRL9 FILE NAME CSODAROI.DNG PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY unL IY PLAN C4 1 • • • TYPICAL WALL SIGN TYPICAL HANGNG SIGN 14 IONEAFOOT TEXT USIN :ss 15 14 -3i?S-NESS NAME 3L?S_NESS NAME 15 TYPICAL WALL SIGN NOTES L ALL SON BOARDS SNAIL M MACE OF r TAM ATM (VICAR COPPORAIVR 570 546-8251} T ARCNTECT TO FROM 5$PORT SY518/5 FOR WALL 506. 3 ALL 5106 SHALL BE PANNED CLAM ALL LET1E@IC 5.11 BE PANTED COLD 5 SWAM FOOFAGE FOR ALL PRCO0360 saes 0 AS FOLLOWS FAR RANCHO SIDS FAR WALL Sob TOTAL SF 0.60 St ® SF 0RLE0 SF G e5E0 0 LGINC FLAN ETJ FAR LUJIWA11TR I FO@MTML NO SCALP HANING SIGN TO BE BOLTED TO WALL TEXT TO BE 3 25 HIGH I DIAMETER STEEL ROD WITH I DIAMETER BALL TEXT TO BE I HIGH PAINTED GOLD BORDER I THICK LNE TOP OP WALL SIGNS TO BE 13 3 ABOVE WALKWAY TEXT TO BE 8 HIGH BOTTOM OP WALL SIGNS TO BE 113 ABOVE WALKWAY TYPICAL HANGING SIGN NO SCALE OMERxmEVEIOPER 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JEFF BALMS 210 EAST 7ENIH STREET SURE SO SAINT PAUL, MOCIF_SCITA 5510I 103*0767-641 FAWNS:SKIS a4Ahru SHEET FWD NNW 11.1 aaceat EEMPERe PRILIPS•drf SIR PLAN ROLFIVAT IMASISZO MM." RAN PROT FLOOR PLY SbCOO FLOOR RAN ROM FLOOR MAN 0.11.1.00 REVISION 1961ORY PROJECT MANAGER REVISMI FERTIHCA110N ` FlogRiaNa• ONANAA• Rom AN. immatem Rd or. copy CITY SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota ett IL LANDFORM M INNEAPOL IS PHOENIX 8068r.-11sq 0011s. N.rr. tls{ lemon. ~Obr4 KIS . Ye In ISsm00498IDE Fa..50.94164 I.11115a0F tiacHean6 wnHa1dlam111N FEE NAME 6200AROLTAVO PROJECT NO. IA101001 PRELIMINARY SIGNAGE PLAN S2.1 0 3 02 03 0 06 0 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 03 0 06 OE 03 03 05 0 J 5 03 03 O 05 03 0 O. B 3 0 06 03 04 OA 03 03 OA 0 03 OA 0 O 03 0 O OA OD 3 O1L(J 0 0 p 6 / OH 05 IDS 09 L 06 07 09 L2 Z. 3 O1 r 0660D LO 06 0 09 05 A 0D 05 OA 09 03 05 0 3 7 05 0T 03 0 05 0 3 0 05 0D 3 5 OD 02 03 05 0 02 05 0 02 03 03 02 3 0 02 3 0 0 0 01 02 02 0 O 0 0 0 0 03 05 03 0 OD LO O 0 0 0 05 01, 07 062 62 /1 D 01 06 Md03 C 0G 2 02 03 03 03 03 -- 0 0! 0 0- 1 r 1 0 0 2 1 03 03 O O 6 A R A 0D 0 0 06 0 09 0 0 2 0 05 03 02 01 2 05 0 03 02 02 05 0 03 0 of 0 00 o) 0 OI 0 IOI 0 0r 0 ! 0 12 01 _ 0 I 0 I 0(2 02 OI 0 0 21 02 1 0311 01 0J 11 0.2 103 0 13 03 §OY 03 0\\ co I 0611 I I of m_4 1 S1 ol 1 011 1 ao 10, 1�1 L 11 Il l�ioa'o_ 1 Lj b91 I 1 t I 101 COB I. —, 1 I I 1 I JPA1 6017 1 D •D 0.0 0.0 ' 07 0 OA 1103 I I I 1 0 gl 091 0 OT 66 0 0 0 0 0 9 03 1 03 MN LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 5Lb0 LIN Oe Caiq caber Derpm Loop lu.a I1F MDR 0 PP60 OOLOIC3 ELL 350 ( TUNE LSOV CLEAR NES 6000 on 25 TEAR DROP) 0 0 O B 7 4P7004P00001 as 950 (ATLANT 606, CEAR PPS 5800 l0 25 TEAR DROP) iP4 ®STATISTICS 6l 0 W ALL ALLE9 ARE MANTNE0 DESC®TOR L M1AI HR NA5/NER AVG/pN ENiff 9TE 3 FC 22 FC 00 FC N/A N/A ®LIGHTING NOTES L ALL NLOE1CA108 02 91.BB11MIOR0 BY TIE CONTRACTOR PEEWEE T1B 5L91TTAL OF PNOTOE1R1C5 PLAN TO THE ENC/EER MS (5) V0ILRNC DAYS PRIOR TO BD 9B111TAL 2 A3. FOOT LATEXES SOWN ON 1149 PLAN REFLECT PROPOSED 9I16 1.005 OILY NEESE SEE ARCOUSC 1RAl MAD FOR 090C LIORS AM LLREN9. nrs 1V SITE LIGHT POLE DETAIL NO SCALE 0 SITE LAMP DETAIL 9/ A0 002R M 0201W 0 0 PLAN NO SCALE B DWETER 0011.491E F0NDA1101 90UTIBE FORD ABOVE C9AOE (REMOVE F031 AFTER CONCRETE KA9 SET) RLt9ORCE VON ( )-04 BARS Ara p 1E5 AT IT ON CENTER. BASE PLATE /T 1HCI• VELD TO CQ!/1M ANCHOR BATS 4 MOO 2T TESL POLE PANTED BROLg ANCO R BELTS 4 RE9D 1E 004081=R 10 BE 2 ABOVE CRADE N PARING AREAS Ara 6• ABOVE CRAPE N 50D 0R PLANRLC BED AREAS OF CRAPE OR ESC A. PEES TO LLR PLC{ REFER TO NOEL 90EDL1E FOR SCE OF CONCUR Na CONAS10R9 DIEMEIER C0L'4E9B FQNDATINL SONAIIBE FORM ABOVE GRAPE. �POET AF 10 I4A9 SETT) RE9FORCE MTN (4)-/P BARS APO p TES POLE FOUNDATION PARKING LOT LIGHT BASE DETAIL NO SCALE LEADER IN LIGHTING SOLUTIONS 21 NORTH O 20 40 norimme SCALE IN FEET 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JEIF WAILS 210 EAST TWIN STREET SUITE EA SAINT PADL MI1CIESDTA 55101 'OL9miss FAX:31.91. Cm SHEET MEC MIT 11111 MIMIC COMM) 1.1.41.1 NSL11Nn fN BAN 41. CAT. Rlal w NW ROM Am 5XIM NPR. a1/N *OW ILMI REVISION HISTORY ORIM y OCV 00 cps le PROJECT MANAGER REMY O 11 CERTIFICATION CITY SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota AIL LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX 10RNASNIbq 4LON.=Nem, WeNusY 8 *9 P. P1sYly Edo US NEWoistLNpNs01 P1eoNAA2®O Nos 11I34ffis0 *9 *909f1 IAt4023211=I R.@{GMN •6110a91Tollnm FILE NAME ETDIAQ'CO(DPX PROJECT NO lAW1001 PRELIMINARY UGHIDJG PLAN E2 1 ®PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE S10E PAYERS SMALL 6 NEE COLOR LECTOR RIELUAR art P 7 11CGESS 7 J SF EACH SET N 4 SAW SASE 1 1 1 CITY OF STILLW4TER A \ 2 j. _ , 4/8,66,, / fa-.. E ----_-_,_-......osic, i e • WA,* ' ill Wri-- --";' live I 1 1 1 1 SWIM 1111MI1 I CQEIEAN NNE 9CEN1a NNE N1 COW. lI KUM mi FEATURES DECIDUOUS TREES ! SCALE A® HIDER TIIA AIERGANAMO ` NOL1E AiD' V 79 CAL Bd• 424 bOM ]OV FORM AL CONIFEROUS TREES F 7 RAM PILLS SPOKE NRA CLAIM OFt6ATA 1T In 40N 20W EVERGREEN SHRUBS C. Y 3ONARERRT61D1 O D Q 71 ® RED OSFR ROSE CLEM BAREERR ALPER VEILIZILM 1 CORMS SEROA mews R now PRECAPRANT MAW 7, MT 2 MT a I1T C M POT POT RN WN 211 Tl V`/ WV SW TW SERRES PERSIST WINTER COLOR YELLOW 'FELLOW FLOWN 9 CAPPED NEDLE CONIFEROUS SHRUBS Q 17 C1 8 OLD COD ,EWER Roam 6 WALES ,AVER AWER19 QFFIDB OD GOLD 300120 NOELOITNB 901-E 6 WART CAL SPREAD PCI PCI ST1 6N IV TV YELLOW NEW GROWER SPREAONC PERENNIALS * 73 0 38 • 33 D 2 71 N RN CRKEaN1C PHLOX FOAM FLOWER ELLE NA:NAL FLOWER MAOEfMAR FERN STR IA D ORO ILL D FA A PRO% ONARCATA 1DR.LA caeOFEAIA sPLamCA IONTUI PEDAMI 11ELLA 0 CRS NT CM- IOIL 1 CAL TNT 1 GAL ROE POT POT POT PCI PVT 1N 0'Hl rnl WM 011 1811 JW 7v 17w w DY eV !NAVE PLANT DARK OLL.E FLOWERS 1Y1fIE FLOWERS PLRFLE FLOWER sF,LE3 SIAOE PLANT FYELLO LOWERS NATIVE SEED MIX j/ DDIM. SEED NAT6E CRAS43 502 9. TLRF SOO wares sew 14 saw. SE SEWED 1 1IF R 1E 6 5 P01D5 PIKE WE MED (PL3) PER AGE MA1NE SEER 1M SMALL 001561 OF DE F010WNG !FECES. LITRE K ESTER (504001011 SCOPARet) P8900 0ROP5EED ESP0RO8OU6 NE1ER0119B) MAN GRAYS (S020A41O11 NI1AN3) ®LANDSCAPE NOTES L UNDSCWE COHMRALYGR PALL 1491 1TE 91E PRm 0 9AIMTRE C ® TO MORE FRIAR WITH STE 000I1106. 1TE LNDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SILL PAYE ALL I/DERBA/D O 11155 LOC TED POOR TO AWE PLOW. 1TE LAADYJPE CENTRAL -TOR PALL COOFOAIAIE NSTALLA1101 MRM C0FRAL CONTRACTOR 2 ALL PLANT MATERIALS PALL DDI90171I WIN TIE NEIIKAN ATIOCIATISI 6 RlSERY161 SIERRA A9 ND SMALL EE 6 WEEDY STOOK, FRS FROM DISEASE DAMAGE AW OBRGRATON F HERE 5 DISCREPANCY 0E11201 11E RISER 6 PLANT, ON TIE UST AW 11E 141182 SHOW ON TIE PLAZA 11E PLAN SHALL COVERS 7p91115 0E05 FRU. DE EDGED WON ME (6) NCH RACE 1411. E001C MALL arrow EAI APPROVED EO AL) AS AMMO 01 PLAN ALL TREES NOT PLACED WITN A SAID PLANTING LED 94111 LAVE A FEAR (4) F001 OWEITR 54PEC ED HARDWOOD PAR% 11A04 091 151NLE0 ARAM THE TREE p111d1 TO BE FAR (4)010, *REMO HARDWOOD BARK UA01 5 SOD ALL TOFF AREAS 1713IUAE0 0Y C06TOKYION. 6 WARMS WED ON PLANT 20EOU.E ARE TOTAL OIANTRS FOR OESIGL CONTRACTOR IS TO PUKE RANI, ACC60S TO LAYEAIT MIN PROPER SPACPC TIE AREA NOCAUD NO DE SPACNG 6 PLANTS PALL GOVERN FNAL OAHOIRS OVER SNNIITY N PLANT 9CIEAAE TpFLANINC SOL F02 13ACOELE0 PL.ANINC RES 91AN. COMM 6 TOME. TO 'WHICH HAS BEEN AOOED THREE (3) PRIM 6 c011RCAL F0RNIRR MO 1/S YARD 6 FEAT RAID PER CLIME YARD IS. PLANING SOL FOC LED ABOVE SHALL $ D. OPPIN N AGN SPECFED 01 PLANS 7 LEE LANDSCAPE CO TRACTOR IS 10 FOLLOW /JL LANDSCNE MEALS AS SSW 11AESS 01TERVIN N7118 ON PLANE ppCORRACTOR TO SEED 1A1M1E GRASS 1M 1 RAZE 6 5 POURS PLOT LNE 3EE0 PER ACRE NORTH 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET CAVNEVJPEVELCWEK 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JETF WALUS 210 EAST TLxfll STREET SUITE 250 SAINT PAUL, AO)CIESOTA 55101 MSS MILES PAffi19161E SIFT INDEX sm wsw a::tc EE2EE222@ aL Ima NW Aml•1rt m IDN mnm 1AA1♦T N1Ln1IUN m POST "API /LAY M. MAO REVISION HISTORY OWN PR UECT MANAGER REM., NPR Jai CERTIFICATION AYr+••r 161N r Orr 1.211 o,ora••• anr Re. a.... CITY SUBMITTAL OCIOBER 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota LANDFORM MINNEAPOL IS PHOENIX 11PMWAas1ANY DAPRPM DARR. 0. 1o1♦alA 1NWM 1han11fm0R1 4E011=01.11f1A NIA Pas MP.YR OR P...PP i91 Pla♦...MU ..5.031411.0 wasHonlorinna FILE NAME L2094ROLCMG PROJECT NO. WC01001 PRELJMINARY UWDSCAPE PLAN L2 1 tiZa • • • ENLARGED PLAN T 10 ®PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE VFW. GIANT I COMM WEE ,f.H11FC Wm I PLANING !R COM. MUM sot OOLEEMS SPEGAL (SEE 801133) FEATURES DECIDUOUS��SHRUBS L_ 3 GL�A/y O O O 46 ® AFERCAN �NR¢¢Tm� H9 OfR OOGW0V0 ROSE GLOW BARBERRY 200.BN11 fIROeIMFTSSIM CORMS 9EMLE BrgHB THESEPO YOB OLOV AALPEI9lA1 24 M 24 HT 00 M 4 HI POT .2E POT POT POT RN ON ION IOW TH JW So>r WME4 COLOR YELLOW FLOWERS CAPPED NEOGE CONIFEROUS SHRUBS 0 » OLD COLD JAPER ...weals CIOETS5 OLD COLD 1 CAL POT TL V MYELLOW E, GROWTH PERENNIALS * 0 • 0 23 SB SS 2 21 34 LADY FERN CPFBPNG PNLOII FOAM FLOWER MAE CARR4L FLOWER RAMMER FERN STELA 0 ORO TLLT ANTRIM A RIOT( ONARICATA 1A4ELLA CORDF9UA IDBF]LU SFNLI1YA MATT PE0A1U1 REMODELS ELS STELLA O ORO f HT 1 CAL CAL 1 CAL f M CAL POT POT POT POT POT POT JN JW RN Tv T214 LTV SETT OW ITN OW A11 1TW SHOE PLANT OAR 01E FLOWES S WERE FIDWTR9 PURPLE FIONER NEES SANE PANT FLOWERS ®LANDSCAPE NOTES l LAM/SLAPS CON(RACTOR SHALL Val TIE SNE PRIOR TO R0T1TNC A EED TO acme FAR1M WITH 91E 024011045 TIE WDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NAVE AIL UDER020 0 MUTES LOCATED PRIOR TO AR11 01CO1 . TIE LAMSC4DE COLRR4CTOR SHALL COOERNTE NSTALLATIW MN GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 2 ALL RANT MATERIALS SHALL C@FQPI WON TIE AlEItCAN ASSOM110N OF NRSERY1EN SIAM/ARDS AM SNALL EE OF MARDT S10CE. FREE f401 DISEASE EELIAGE AM Ob0ORAT1011 F THERE IS A CSCEPANCT BETWEEN TIE M16ER OF FLAMES ON TIE LST ND TIE WEER NONE ON 11E P1424 11E PLAN NALL COMA p90S BEDS SWILL ff EDGED WIM SR (6) NON EEAfX not f00EC (BLADE coma, C2 APPROVED EL IAL) AS FIXATED ON PLAN ALL TREES NOT PLACED MIN SKIS PLANTED BED STOLL HAVE A FOR ( ) FOOT GOMEIER AREOOED HARDWOOD BAR RNACN 05.1145114183 01201D THE TREE EOUASN 10 BE FOR (4) INN LREODC9 HARDWOOD BAg PLOP 5 SOD ALL T1S AREAS 0ST1RH0 00 COSIRIKf01 6. OIYVORES LS1E0 ON RAM SC1EOL E ARE TOTAL OUNIRITS FOR OFTEN C1OPACTOR N TO BALE PLANTS ACC04AC TO LATOff MIN PROPER SPAOTC TM ARE FOCAIED NO 11E SPA00 OF RANTS SNNL GOVERN FNAL OINAN1MES OVER MIAOW( N PLANE 501OLLE CRANING S0. FOE BA0F200 PLANING PIES SELL maw of winos. TO MA01 ALAS SEEN LADED 'IEEE (3) woos OP COMEYCAL FERTLDR ND 1/5 4141 CF FEAT FUNS PER CLEM YARD B PLANING S0. INMATE° ABOVE SHALL BE ET OEM N NEWS SPE:FED ON PLAN 4 TIE LAM15(APE C0111/ACfOR S TO FOLLOW ALL LNDSCAPE OHMS AS SNOW MESS 011ERWIM NORFO CH A400 DO!,RlTRACTOR TO SEED WINE GRASS 11% AT RATE O: D PO/OS PRE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. L SEE SLEET L2 1- PREII ER1 LN03CAPE PLAN FOR TOTAL OLMMME5 NORTH 0 10 20 MJ 501 NORTH MAIN LLC JEFF WARS 210 EAST TENTH STREET SUITE 250 SAINT PAN, MIPCE60TA 55101 TF3ID REHPFS E 865123100 CTIY SHEET PMEC OVL MIA MAI MST MSpnm PLANEWA, Aden PLY ma As AS REVISION HISTORY MOMS 0.4 41* III Os PR41ER MANAGER REVERY ▪ AYSI ▪ IMSSAM LF701FiCAT10N +� ~eii ao,r� ��Aararra Awq SAMNA ASrr. spa ▪ ®M w▪ •� CITY SUBMITTAL 0CT06EK 26 2001 PROJECT 501 NORTH MAIN STREET Stillwater Minnesota ettIL LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX IM PINANMANlA MM." W OT6MM Ims1I>9JmR 0403444141117 08T40124411404 Pat *0*2 �1D 00 PA.M ra0524 e.Lww hN04151NSI 10100110110111101 RLE NAME PROJECT NO. MR01001 ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN L6 1 SCALE IN FEET LANORISsi • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GA�OOR1TeD 0 0 0 0 o i L 0 0 0 0 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ISSUE DATE Typc Doc A9 BOLT DAM LOaMacaavus: OESOI DO/ FMVBM BmeLT POSIT FOIL DRAM 'T►T Data loused as GonbBal Dowment Datc REVISIONS Ik box CITY SUBMITTAL 10212001 SMUCKLER ARCHITECTS 7E0o VOMOOTONMOLE SLIM OM%MM®OTA MOO VOICE OMF214o FAX (0)MM7 Al • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN —t—t — 1— -J I- -1 ILI LIJ < cn z < cc F. 0 re z 0 10 IS) ISSUE DATE. TYPec MOULT 01108 �lIl,.'Ltl��,:ll:l,l ���i� mew= REVEW OESIGINCIEV PEW/EN ND BST 'EMT RI& Dam DRAVOt 7/7 REVIENEEt Dabs Wand es Contract DOCININIS1 Max REVISIONS Dakc CITY SUBMITTAL SMUCKLER ARCHITECTS TWTSNC ROI IMIOIXSTONAMBILIE KX/114 IFIMESOTA sap 'MICE OXXOXXX4101 FAX 0631)112111:07 A2 • 0 • • o 0 SECOND FILOOR PLAN/ 11111111 0 0 0 0 t 1 1• i_ j_ 1 1 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 , iii11111111 •-•4---_--- MA - — --=11--=-- t 0 0 1111111 [_111111X 51.1 0 EiN/MIZEINS/BIA ISSUE DATE. Typx Dstsc Oa NAT OVA38 eaEM= REVIBV fNINGSCIEV 011D1rEf NNW FINAL DRAM 17t REVILIVECt Osis Issued as Contmat Documest Delis REVISIONS Wee CITY SUBMITTAL 10-2520D1 SMUCKLER ARCHITECTS 766110111111101911 AMBLE 11101AM EOM WPM= Bpi vat= gril) OW= rAX obsocamow A3 • • • 0 • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ITHIRD FLIOR PLAN II II II •rik, arms —mom , 0 • • min sad. —,.--=-- —w-w • • • • • wI" t't shis man 11 �� Mil II .R G3r'3s�weM1ni� i - Filn4 • • w= • = f'1 • t kf II • ISSUE DATE TM= Dabs A7 KW °WOO CEEIGN OE REM/ COCONTI PERMIT AWL DRAWPt Trt REVIEWElk Dabs hawed as Casbact Docursaal Oahe REVISIONS Dabs CITY SUBMITTAL 10-2B-2001 SMUCKLER�RH ARCHITECTS AR415IECrSi oofi TWO *0.NIOTOIAVM. SMITE EOM, MMEOOTA WOO VOICE pm wax FAX p6'5000NA A4 • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i L , , I i I I I, li I i I I, 1 I , I , I I , I , , I I I I I I I I li I , I , I I , I I I I I I I L _j_ _ __4 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.:111111lllllll 1111 111111111111111111111111111111I11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I11111111IIlIll111I ;: 11 lull 111111111111111111I11111111I1111111111111111111111111111111111/11111::11111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111:11111111111111111111111 111111111111111 lIlIlIlIlIl 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111I111111111111111111111111I111111111I11 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA seseamessrdsms ISSUE DATE. bps Oder Alt 11ULTOVq/ SCHIBIATC REVIEW 0®I071 Clef m?YE111 VW BET PERMIT DRAW* 177 bets Mod as Contract Ooalmad Odic REVISIONS mac CITY SUBMITTAL 10-212001 SMUCKLER ARCHITECTS TOO WA 1/110701 AVENUE 1OUflI 131101.111111310TA f0tli VOCEi el5111OLt100 FAi (1114111/007 A5 a a a a a a a a a 0 a a a V1O33NNIW a3.LVMl1LLS 1331:11S NIHW H11:1ON 1,09 011 NIVIN HTON 1.09 JJ 0 a a a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a a 1::.. 1:::: a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a a a :a .... ...■ uo: 1q::O a a a a a a 0 a a 1::.. 1: IJJ .100 1320 1 1e 5 a W� � CO Vmd CO no 1111 D 1 1 a 0 0 0 0 a a a a 0 0 1 0 0 a Kfi 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a a 1:::: Ij: a a a a a a a a a a a a a InOMO MIMS o� a a a a 0 a 0 a 1: 1:: a 0 a a 0 0 a a a 0 a a 0 a a a 1 I7 .1 ❑ 1 ❑ 1 0 0 0 a a 17 0 i a ti a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a 0 o a 0 0 0 .se 1 1 1 • • • 1 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/01-53 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2001 Project Location 1412 West Olive Street Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Brett Christianson Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 17'6" requested) for the construction of a 2nd story addition Discussion The request is for a variance to the front yard setback to construct a second floor addition to his existing 1IA story home The existing house is 17'6 from the property line The proposed addition will not alter the existing foundation The 'A story will be removed and a full 2nd floor will be added, creating two bedrooms and a full bathroom Many of the houses in the neighborhood are 1 to 1 'A story high, but there does not seem to be a consistency of 1 or 2 story structures in the neighborhood Height of the existing house is 17 feet high, the proposed addition would be 22 feet high Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the variance, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 All plans be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official 2 All revisions to the approved plan be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 3 The addition shall be similar in architectural style, materials and color 4 Drainage shall remain on site 5 Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance • • • • 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Photos/Floor Plan/Elevation Drawings 10/18/2001 14 28 4308810 CITY OF STILLWATER • • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt Nosy PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED _Special/Conditional Use Permit LvVanance ,Resubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $100+50/tot _Comprehensive Plan Amendment $500 Zoning Amendment' $300 ,Planning Unit Development " $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 'An escrow fee is also required to the costs orattorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (1 e, photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PACE 05 v/oi-53 Fees $50/200 $70/200 A site plan Is required with applications Any Incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION pp Address of Project / ve S7' SA (lw4t-e Assessors Parcel No. 1\ --2 9 , 0.55 z o (IL/ Zonin Distnct 7 6 o I lu ' Scree., (GEO Code) 9 Description of project �a��� G�//I����i3�.�ib� calb9ve o '115 rr//i '1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify 1 will comply with file permit Nit 1$ granted and used " Property Owner tEl r /l Chi Mailing Address / 6772 Gil O /,` ve Sf City - State - Zip Gvc.dec -/74/ Telephone No 6 s'i- 357 1.- zG j(37 —z yk--/?ssL Representative. Mailing Address Crty - State - Zip_" Telephone No Signature f ,f�(�Y Signature Lot Size (dimensions) 7° x US - Land Area 'iS1o50 s�.�.,� Fr Height of Buildings Stories Principal / /z. Accessory SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Bufldin floor are & "'Sr-'9squard feet Existin 0 :—h s kej square feet Feet Jr, Proposed /56� N aed square feet / 7 Paved Impervious Area (0 square feet No of off-street parking spaces H•Vnanam8releheealPLANAPP FRM June 22, 2000 • • • To whom it may concern, 10-25-01 I'm wntmg to you today asking for a variance, so I can make some improvements to my house What I want to do, is build a screen porch on top of my garage, which would be a four season porch at sometime in the future,the screen porch will have a new master bedroom above it I also want to change from a 1 '/2 story to a full 2 story In the new 2nd story, would be 2 bedrooms, a master bathroom & a full bathroom, & the master bedroom above the screen porch On the main level, I would be changing the bathroom to a''Y2 bath, & moving it to the front of the house I would be movmg the stairs to the east side of the house, (they are now in the middle), and the NE corner would now be a dmmg area, redo the kitchen, and the main level would be 1 big open area, giving the house a much more spacious feel to it I'm hoping you'll grant meet this application, because the house needs a lot of work, & though it would be less expensive to Do the necessary repairs, it would still be very costly, so I d rather put the money into making it a nice home The garage roof is now Span Crete, & it leaks a lot The cost of getting it sealed up properly wouldn t be much less than the cost of the matenal for the screen porch My roof has seen it's last winter, the house desperately needs new siding or a paint job With the new project, I would be using cedar siding in front, & vinyl siding on the rest of the house I believe it would benefit the neighborhood, as nght now my house is an eyesore, & if I can do this project it no longer would be I believe it would help their property value as well as mine My house is very small I have 3 people living here full time , & 2 more every other week Thank you for your consideration Brett Christianson 1412 W Olive St Stillwater, MN 55082 651-351 1026 651-248 9781 88 �cen m ° 2 1 p�05 W Ob, m s0 m 8 50 05 0000 10 9 8 9 8 - m /' m e 502 4 5026 9 m 8 5 - 4 44,1 4 77 3 2 C 1 • 4'P0") g 1 gco.) 8 15iiFoN 8 �5mt 50 14 �)0 8 25 , 50 50 b 54 _ — — 77 '—- n --- 2 mu S5 5 75 ---- 50 — WEST MYRTLE 8 7 9 6 5 8 50. 9 WES 25 17 a 0 as 2 19 a 21 22 0 0 R A $ $1 8 r�AMbtY' em 50 m 4 - 3 2 1 9 8 9 �Am 23 - 24 25 26 bFRttl a 2 0 m m �5 2 12 3 I 20 50 ;0 .cw 2 66000 1m60 3 m) Ww 4 n 5 p54 w (0061) as 5 w 90 eo n AND 60 2 1 m 8 10 9 n 12 13 41.7. m m 60 `fir E 3 ' 2 41 1 i st — g. —8 CSAH 5 5 4 SEE i LE"'S 1 �) m 7 m 9 12 9 STREET 43 5 m— 50 50 m 50 60 0 I— .�5$ 4° 3 W 6 so� 2 1 Q. 8 8 9 6 8 9 e 9 0 I— fil ro ADDITION 550 1 9 w 0 tY ACATED WES OAK STREET. 4.... 171 m so1 1 41.44 try 10 9) 3 e) 10 VW g_ ..�—' 9 �) R 4- — e 9 9 10 11 I _ _ - ag Y e $ U 9 8 5 T a� Q �0n 2 W 9 8$ *can 5 • y _1> i 444- 7 5 m Fn 5.w 9 ai 6 so °0 I p 60 1- Q co w w 1n 665 2 9 75 T5 10 11 12 50 50 p0I 26 9m 07 6 5 4 3 ADD ION 2 n 160 2 12 a 0J $ _ 2 11 I' ) 10 2 1 so so 12 12 Location Map epee) ()ow)8et 8 jai ? 9 f YED6 BOO SWm9 PAGE S� AC 1 m .1DR S 000679E5 r 1 R_IW VOW R19W T324 T IN TION r9N r8N ✓ 7N R_W R_IW R_OW Vicinity Map — 0 166 Scale in Feet rm m..ro or roma pan own ...en WV Mow or. oft. e. ram —waroet Coo. Stow, On. clato ,....,.,5.3..com.ion nom. Moot. Aug. 200 .w n.a onto. a m r • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/01-54 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2001 Project Location 702 St Croix Avenue West Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicants Name Timothy J Freeman, representing Clark and Adam Nyberg Type of Application Resubdivision Project Description A resubdivision of existing six lots into four lots Discussion The applicant is proposing to resubdivide six lots into four lots of 12,439 square feet each The proposed lot size and shape meet the requirements of the RB, Duplex Residential Distnct Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 Approval of City Engineer 2 Legal survey to be recorded Findings The subdivision meets the development regulations of the zoning and subdivision ordinances Attachments Application Form/Survey • Case No SU Date Filed Fee Paid B a/ -s Receipt No g3sa/ PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 _Special/Conditional Use Permit Vince L esubdivision Subdivision* Fees $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance Design Review $300 $500 $70 $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (► e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with apphcat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with app!►cat►ons Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the application process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project -70 0119 Assessor's Parcel No a/6 50,70 3306 € ( Zoning District ,i -off Description of Protect Ami. ch q� P ,6 � [off. EO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I w►ll comply w►th file perm►t if it is granted and used " Representative'-z Fge A^; Ouf'iry kj4J°L Mailing Address /8/5-AherNivrsrs.z., %vd' City - State - ZIpiS''LL JA -ex! M,J 53798Z. Telephone No 5139-8833 Property Owner (1Jc r' k 4-A-c -a /v Mailing Address /9q'(9 O &nee' City - State - Zip Sq-tiliikiiee, /H SSD 8 Z Telephone No / I-q3 `t-1797 Signature CeAti k SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) _ x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 9 n 8 )DITIO 2,7 ET • 0 N _ J <r VACATED 73800 w Tn w 0 ❑ f 12 WEST SYCAMORE 2 ••• ST ST CROIX 10 e0 4 F w w to 0 0 z Q f0 J R w a C o Q 0 w a ❑ STREET In 4- I 111911151 ro ••• /..1 IP.' / Ow AVENUE MEADOWVIE ADD`— w 1. 0 0 z -e>Pn ((����0) eo STIM9ATER AVENUE VACATE▪ D STILLWATER AVE ` VACATEDSTIL ATER AVE it, PER BK 15 M SC PG 113 _ i I I PER BK 15 MISC PGA r TfL,pT,9� I ,�'\ �/ _ r _ 2 /�i.1,3 ' 4 ` 2 ✓ ems f [i, w - I r 5_ - G ▪ - '''a .79 __ 1 i _13_ ro t 1 TPa — _•—% , z s , 2 pQ •...\ til > _., " •. 1122. r t VAC•WILKINS DOC3820133 WEST 8 _ -_— Location Map b •a • • 20 IS to • • , 8 30 30 ✓ — 38 30 30 30 • e �I 8 8 e — • I 8 1 I° I P • • R_IW R_'0W R19W LW R_IW R_'OW Vicinity Map 209 1 I Scale in Feet Ada . a•r a wens.=Casa: WoosWoos2ai__wwae...ab ..w Was.* rat Prow 4t•de • 0 200 Mop nal oa,m• A 2C0 /4 • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/01-55 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2001 Project Location Olive Street between Second and Third Streets Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Marianne and Donald Nolde Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance to the side yard setback (20 feet required, 8' 5" requested) for the construction of an exterior exit stairway and two elevated decks Discussion The applicant received a Special Use Permit (5/8/00) and Design Review (5/1/00) to construct a four -unit three story residential building At this meeting, the applicant is requesting a variance to construct an exterior stairway and two elevated decks The stairway is as per building code A 8 foot by 30 foot exterior deck is proposed for the second floor on the east side of the building A 8 foot by 22 foot exterior deck is proposed for the east side on the third floor Conditions of Approval 1 The Community Development Director shall review and approve all revisions to the approved plan 2 All conditions of approval from the May 8, 2000 Planning Commission meeting still apply Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors i 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Architect/Construction Documents HPC Action November 5, 2001 - Approved +6-0 with following conditions 1 Poles for the decks shall be metal, not wood • • 10/15/2001 14 57 4308810 CITY OF STILLWATER PAGE 03 • • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid U� Receipt No (S 7 7 5 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED __ Special/Conditaonai Use Permit ,Variance _Resubdlvislon __.Subdivision* _Comprehensive Plan Amendment" $500 Zoning Amendment" $300 Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 "An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attomey and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (1 e, photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Cl _6S DEPARTMENT Fees $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/1ot A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the appllcatlon process PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project ('1 1 v e SiVe-el Assessor's Parcel No 13\ 28 ()30 2c 101 1 ON. (GEO Code) ZoningDistrictistrict C._ P D Description of Project A- (LiiTt i-J o' t Si K S 'v -✓ �-✓-€1 "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with file permit if It is granted and used " Property Owner OO,vl�`Hav'Ic.-h 4 e NoU2tepresantabve Ij Mailing Address 311 s 3 vomit tv-€4 Mailing Address k City - State - Zip 51 � 1 Iw�� tN 5-;pp Z city - state - zip A-30V b ,(c z.aZ i I L1 Telephone No 1— 4 S °I — 2J.0 Telephone No H r t 5 - .44-9.—C, Signature G�G�1 '7 Co Signature PTIO SITE AND PROJECT DESCRI Lot Size (dimensions) b I x115 Land Area _ C( G 7 Scv e-(, Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal 3 3 Accessory H'MenamaMshella\PLANApp FRM June 22 2000 Total Building floor are Existing Proposed Paved impervious Ar No of off-street Id cj /-may" e711 �/ D square feet par ng 5� may v4 < -74-i a I %9 _1 square feet square feet square feet spaces £1 7600 Wayzata Boulevard Oct 25, 2001 4 Unit Housing Project Olive Street Stillv‘ater, Minnesota LUCK DUIECUO, 11719 763-512-1850 FAX 763-512-1845 Suite # 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Developer Don and Marianne Nolde 311 South 3rd Street Stillwater, Minnesota (651) 439 2645 Site The site is an existing lot located on the South side of Olive Street between 2nd and 3rd Streets The site is owned by the developer and at the present time is undeveloped Proposed Development The proposed project is a 4 unit, 3 story, residential structure with 8 enclosed parking spaces The housing units consist of 1, two -bedroom townhouse style unit, and 3, two bedroom single level units Enclosed parking is provided in a semi -underground parking garage located below the housing units (this is a change from 3 townhouse style units and 1 single level unit) Zoning The site is presently zoned CBD A conditional use permit was previously applied for and granted by the Planning Commission on May 801 ,2000 Variance Required The building foot print and location on site is basically the same as presented to and approved by the Planning Commission on May 8th of 2000 As the plan has developed and the market for single level units rather than two level units has been recognized, the need for an escape stair from the third floor unit and exterior deck space for upper level units have been identified The variance requested is to allow the construction of an exterior exit stairway and two elevated decks on the east side of the building over the roof deck of the basement parking garage Neither the deck nor stairway eliminate any green space and are located on the side of the building adjacent to the Qwest commercial property 0 Location Map 0 UN s1.I 7 36 4 N CITY F 6 u R_IW R2OW RI9W R_ W R_IW R2OW Vicinity Map 0 160 Scale in Feet Own. 2202.2020 . a02.022602 01.2 a 222.2 *as .iwewww 20 us.bw.nY006 P aps. • � so.r. w....gnwn .. �cs.... On I 41000 0. �;2.2200 1.0 22200 011111.0.=.1m. 411•0.• .1•11. • ••••-...,1 KMR Architects, Ltd. 7600 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 763-512-1850 Fax 763-512-1845 k//1/1/0 1111.1.1111.11.1 .111 1111111111111111111!.111111111111 L "1111311111111flaqt • • mesioniz•Anume• •,..4 .....91101. amommin or -9 Is APAVIIMII III 1•11111111-7.1. "ilr IP .711P-A11111111111111.3 111111116Th • 3 d St eet i" U S WEST 4 UNIT kCUSINC POJECT OLIVE ST1EET STILLWATER MINNESOTA DEVELOPED 51': DON 4 MARI,dNME NOLDE 311 SOIItN 3rd STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 651-439-2645 ARCHITECT: KMR ARGI-IITEGTS, LTD. 1600 UlAYZ4TA BLvD. SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 163-512-1850 SECTION 61 OLIVE STREET r 3rd Street • • L • 14 -0' MANUF BTONE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III 14 0 MOCUL4R FACE BRICK 4 0 FACEEBRBRICK 18 -8' 20 8' DENTAL FACIA MOLDNG FYPON NO 846-II BRICK IETBTCNE F'ROJ 1' PROJ 3/4 8' 14IG14 BRK ARCH PROJ. I/2 Y1-8' 1o1DULAR FACE BRICK PROJ 3/4 94-0 UJEST 1BUILDING ELEv TION 0 4' 8 12 1 w H a Z 0 0 Z W It ti SCALE I/4 I-0 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER ROD FOR 'b--o \ o= CERTIFICATET AND DECIMALS �M�SURVoE1Y (MEASUREMENTS SHOWN I HEREBY CERTIFY TENT THIS SURVEY PLAN OR REPORT VAS PREPARED BY MC OR UNDER MY DIRELI SUPLITVISION TAND THAT OFATHE/�TATELjENC=D LAND MI 1SOTA ST�IiVEUIi UNDER Randy L Kurth L L S No 20770 Russell J Kurth L L S No 16113 OL_ 0 l0 SCALE IN FEET 0 i to M 757 LJZ?7 ^M�(12GO (P) 11)1k ibacAL. o c- `j(9CWaL'A x �o.sv 4, .l1 fL KURTH SURVEY. NC 4002 JCFI CRSON ST NC COLUMI)IA I ILIGI I1 S MN 55421 (012) 100 9169 I AX (612) 700 7602 unit: Jut--1' Zoo 0 = 112014 MONUMENT -� Ya H 3 o r v A-clotl elm ti 1 1 1 \ t�c.T�1PJIN( WItL f8 s' _ (0 —_ -� bo (?) 2 S �,`-�C2-- f- `.,t-li 1�(L-,� oi•A ��V i �-( j�'� t� - itio `C �J L OG'� .1 0 0cam Qo y Q V o .�¢v of O'c' 2 7- 1 N 7 y3 8 • • • L_ 20' _0" STORAGE UP STORAGE STORAGE % STORAGE /1. • ELEVATOR LOBBY ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT L f J 1 1 j U 0 PARKING GARAGE I L' C:D i) 0 D 0 ao • ^`' T _ _ ONIMM ry 1=10 1=1•IP 4=1•MMI ..kMb =11• O.M/ SEIM• MMIM• •INIMD II•1 ••••••• 6•1=1 61=1•1•1 11=111 ••••••• 4•1=Mr PROPERTY LINE SITE AREA 6,961 SQ FT GARAGE E LEVEL PLAN GROSS BUILDING AREA 4141 SQ FT PLAN NORTH MN IN II 0• IVY M. 1 1 • 1 1 T 201 -0° 801-0' 151-0a b io - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M. - - - - - - - - - 1 s. 1 612111. COI- —ICV r CA -IN r 0 0 DECK a ELEVATOR LOBBY BUILDING LOBBY x I -4 j } 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEVEL. ONE PLAN - EL V 1001-0" GROSS 'BUILDING AREA 3,016 SQ FT PLAN NORTH 0. w w w t. 41 l ., i C 1 Sc DR CII' 0 Da L 201-0° __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ SO'-0° 151-0° w cn DECK eisTEILCOL. DINING / LIVING °lDOD DAM* * RPH9.Aci o mL RA°.°n LEVEL TWO PLAT ELEV 1101_8II ems COL WEIL COL GROSS UILD INCH AREA 3,01i7 SQ FT WEIL COL a 81189. COL efMIIL COL PLAN NORTH i 1 I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I _J • ZOOM 0• rr w IOW L 20'-0° CO _______• _ _ 80'-0° 15'-0° f^� • • BEDROOM 14 x12 _ ____41_ BEDROOM DECK LAUNDRY' t UTILITY KITCHEN ©0 ©© STORAGE 111011. HOME OFFICE COATS U TOI T« / c ELEVATOR -'- LOBBY // ////// DECK LEVEL THREE PLAN - ELEV 1211_4II • GROSS BUILDING AREA 2,902 5Q FT PLAN NORTH 1 -8' 5 -0 1-4' BABE t BALL BY FYPON NO 431 BALL BASE - NO.490 15 DIA. BALL MET FLASHING BOX FLUTED COL m 9 cl 11111 111 == 11111 11111111111IIII E IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII=- STONE COPING n 2-0-- W. I RAILING DENTAL FACIA MOLDNG FYPON NO 846-11 W. I i >r-__�v---'i MANUF STONE COPING MANUF KEYSTONE FYPON- • 428 U.I. I RAILING >r� W. I RAIL PA 8' SOLDIER GRS 2 o�un,1�Th,,,J MOOI FACE 16 NIGH BRC ARGN 1- LLD OR COMP PANEL _-- ���``�\ Ul/ SCROLLS SEE DET _ _ PCXIRED MALL a --. GARAGE DOOR •MB UM 1I 2 4 POURED WALL MODULAR FACE BRICK NORTH UILD INCH ELEVATION 0 4' 8 12 4?- 6 1 i 2'-4' 8 HIGH DI (. ARCH MET FLASHING ..ICc�: 5..: radi• 22 8' DENTAL FACIA MOLDING FYPCN NO 846 11 CLOTH AWING Ire FLZSa 3-f13: 3l.: 20 -8 94 0 8'HIGH BR .A ttw°n01mu mmi o„ua�,\ 18 -8 EAST 5UILDINGELEVATION 4 0 0' 4' 12 14 -0 MANIP STONE 2'-4' STONE COPING 14 -0' — J FACE BRICK 4q "44°. Ihm DENTAL FACIA MOLDMCi FYPON NO 8464 I 1- BASE 1 BALL BY FYPON NO 431 BALL BABE - NOA30 WB' DIA. BALL MET FLASHING 8 CLOTH AWNMG • DBBL. HUNG mopuLAct FACE EIRJCK MODULAR FACE BRICK CLOTH AWNNG 1Fe„s+�:j/_-'„set,- �i he 1 I� POURED WALL 1-0 W. I RAILING BOX FLUTED COL } MEIg PAINTED W. I RAILING 11 PAINTED PANELS LLi 1 RAILING DBBL. HUNG WINDOWS 9 r1=----I L J SOU I1-1 15UILEDII C ELE i A I 101 L — J 0 4 8 12 1111 CFvQ+IltflieakRe44 11 ,j • MEMORANDUM To Planning Commission From Sue Fitzgerald, City Planner Date November 13, 2001 Subject Fence Ordinance Revision Attached for your review and approval is a revision of the Fence Ordinance (Subd 24 Sec 16) The revision is for Subd 24 Sec 16, d (4) allowing for clear comers on corner lots Recommendation Approval Attachment Draft ordinance • • DRAFT -11/8/01 (16) Fence regulations Fence regulations are as follows a Purpose The purpose of this subsection is to provide for the regulation of fences in the city, to prevent fences being erected that would be a hazard to the public, or and unreasonable interference with the uses and enjoyment of neighbonng property and are compatible with existing uses, other zoning restrictions and dramageways b Definitions For the purpose of this subdivision, the following definitions shall apply Fences means any linear structure used to prevent access by persons or animals or prevent visual or sound transference c Permit required No fence shall be erected without first obtaining a fence permit Application shall be made to the community development director along with a fence permit fee in the amount of $25 00 The community development director is authonzed to issue a fence permit if the application indicates that the fence will be in compliance with this subdivision The city council shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged that the community development director was in error The appeals shall be taken as prescnbed in subdivision 29 of this section d In yards Fences may be permitted in all yards, subject to the following 1 Fences in excess of six feet above the ground grade shall be prohibited in residential districts 2 The side of the fence considered to be the face (finished side as opposed to structural supports) shall face abutting property 3 No fence shall be permitted on public nghts—of-way 4 • fe i 1 �fi0-Tcii1TTTT`dITTT-rR'Iti'[�fi Ili 1 fiirilrif eta nr�t e�rir����' e ......0 1 ti Clear corners On a corner lot in any residential district no fence, wall, hedge or other structure or planting more than 42 inches in height may be erected, placed or maintained within the triangular area formed by the intersecting street lines and a straight line adjoining the street lines at points which are 40 feet distant from the point of intersection, provided that this regulation does not apply to trees trimmed to a height of eight feet above the street grade level shall not cxce,es-nrheight In residential districts, fences shall be limited to a height of 42 inches in the front and exterior side yard required setback area. (Ord N 815, 8-1-95) 6 No fence shall be erected before all lots within a drainage system or platted block have had the final grade established and approved and all lots within the system or platted block have had turf established with grass seed or sod e Along property lines Fences may be permitted along property lines subject to the following 5 r 1 Fences in residential distracts may be erected on the lot line provided the footings are within the lot line 2 Fences in commercial or industrial distracts may be erected on the lot line to the height of six feet or a height of eight feet with a secunty arm for barbed wire f Existing No existing fence in violation of this section will be allowed to be replaced or rebuilt Should an existing fence be replaced or rebuilt, it must come under the regulations of subsection (1)p of this subdivision g Impeding drainageways and easements No fence shall be erected where it will impede a drainageway or drainage easement h Violations Violations of subsection (1)p of this subdivision may be enforced by injunction, and the city shall be entitled to the remedy of abatement in order that a fence erected in violation of subsection (1)p of this subdivision may be removed • • Memo • s To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date November 8, 2001 Subject Andiamo Drop Off At the October Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission approved modifications to the Andiamo ticket office site plan with direction to staff and the applicants representative to propose a specific design for the south end of the Main Street Parking Lot adjacent to the Andiamo office Since that meeting, I have met with Mark Balay to come up with a design A graphic of the design will be presented at meeting time The substance of the design is to • widen the parking lot entrance and move the curb line of the lot further to the south (this may require repositioning the Stillwater entrance sign) • providing a raised curb or island separation the drop off area from the parking lot access dnve (this may eliminate one or two parking spaces) • constructing a sidewalk connecting the drop off area to the boat access walkway • provide one or two handicapped spaces next to the drop off • eliminating handicapped spaces from the office site With this proposal, there would be no vehicular access from the south end of the parking lotto the nverfront A bus drop off would be supported by the City and proposed for TH 95 Main Street (this may require some street widening and sidewalk construction) A plan showing these changes will be presented at meeting time Recommendation Decision on design for parking lot drop off area • Memo e • To Planning Commission A From Steve Russell, Community Development Director /v Date November 8, 2001 Subject TH 36 Partnership Study Lynne Bly, Project Manager for the TH 36 Partnership Study, will be at the meeting to discuss the scope of the partnership study and study schedule The Planning Commission, as a whole, will represent the City in preparation of the study Attached to this report is the scope of work and general descnption of study process Recommendation Discuss TH 36 study process and committ to study schedule Attachment Memo of October 31, 2001 and scope of work • • TO Stillwater Planning Commission FROM Steve Russell, Community Development Director Lynne Bly, Mn/DOT Project Manager, T H 36 Partnership Study DATE October 31, 2001 SUBJECT T H 36 Partnership Study Background One of the central issues left unresolved by Mn/DOT's May, 2000 T H 36 Corridor Management Plan was what the intersections on T H 36 between T H 5 and TH 95 should be like in the future to better fit with local plans and business needs, accommodate future traffic (through - traffic AND local travel), improve safety, and provide better connections for pedestrians and bicyclists The T H 36 Corridor Management Plan had evaluated two "hybrid" alternatives that adjusted frontage roads and that contemplated removal of one signal, but these scenarios were focused on managing the state highway and did not attempt to analyze local traffic implications That much -needed work will be completed as a cooperative effort between Mn/DOT, the cities of Oak Park Heights and Stillwater, and Washington County It is that additional, locally -oriented analysis that is now being started through the T H 36 Partnership Study At the Stillwater City Council's meeting of July 17, 2001, the Council adopted a resolution pledging the City's participation in and support for the T H 36 Partnership Study — a planning process that is geared toward providing " needed facts to fully evaluate plan alternatives in developing a consensus vision for the T H 36 corridor " At the Council's meeting of October 16, 2001, participation in the study was again endorsed Purpose of the Partnership Study The T H 36 Partnership Study anticipates that there will be a need, at some point in the future, to eliminate signals at the T H 36 intersections of Norel/Washington, Oakgreen/Greeley, and at Osgood The Study's purpose is to analyze various configurations of grade -separated or at -grade intersections and, determine which options best meet local as well as highway needs, both long- term and as interim measures Partnership Study Status and Approach SRF Consulting Group, the consultant who conducted the Downtown Stillwater Traffic Operations Study, has been selected for the T H 36 Partnership Study A scope of services has been developed by staff from Stillwater, Oak Park Heights, Washington County, and Mn/DOT that emphases identification of local impacts of alternative intersection or interchange configurations for the three T H 36 intersections between T H 5 and T H 95 (A copy of the scope is attached ) The study analysis will address local traffic, business, pedestrian, emergency services, and other impacts throughout the study area from T H 5 to T H 95 and from CSAH 12/Myrtle Street south to CSAH 14 To help ensure that the study accurately reflects local concerns, considerations, and consensus, a Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) will help guide the study Through monthly meetings, beginning in December, this PAC will be asked to identify relevant issues, identify potential alternatives, and to evaluate study findings, and to make a consensus recommendation to the two cities, the county, and to Mn/DOT regarding preferred intersection designs The study is scheduled to be completed by June of 2002 • • The 9-member Stillwater Planning Commission has been asked to serve as the CIty's representatives to the PAC Oak Park Heights has asked 2 members of its Planning Commission, 2 Park Commissioners, 1 Council member, 2 business representatives and 2 citizens to participate on the PAC Washington County has asked staff of the Pubic Works Department to participate During the course of the study, two public open houses will provide opportunities to identify issues, review study analyses, and gather perspectives regarding alternatives and their identified effects (impacts and benefits) Meetings will also be scheduled with key stakeholders (such as businesses and schools), and occasional briefings of the two city councils will also be scheduled Key project milestones are identified below T H 36 Partnership Study Project Milestones • first PAC meeting in mid December, history/background for study, purpose, goals, etc go over existing conditions and some discussion of future conditions • consultant s existing conditions technical memo presented at January PAC, also firm up future conditions and begin preliminary ID of the 6 initial alternatives for screening • by mid February consultant present no build findings and first cut screening of the selected alternatives • mid March open house focus is on the results of the screening analysis of 6 alternatives including consequences of no build and also info about existing and future conditions • end of March, PAC chooses 3 scenarios for detailed analysis • mid April, 2nd open house, consultant presents analysis findings, PAC begins consensus discussion • by mid May, complete consensus discussions • end of May consultant completes draft report • early June PAC review and comment on report • end of June, consultant completes final report • • • 12/12/01 1 /8/02 2/12/02 3/20/02 4/9/02 5/8/02 6/12/02 • TO Stillwater City Council FROM Steve Russell, Community Development Director Lynne Bly, Mn/DOT Project Manager, T H 36 Partnership Study DATE October 11, 2001 SUBJECT Local Cost Share for T H 36 Partnership Study 7--__-- 1/I76 frii-(-7thvitY' q-zA44) Background At the Council's meeting of July 17, 2001, the Council adopted a resolution pledging the City s participation in and support for the T H 36 Partnership Study — the planning process that is geared toward providing `the needed facts to fully evaluate plan alternatives in developing a consensus vision for the T H 36 corridor " Partnership Study Status and Approach SRF Consulting Group, the consultant who conducted the Downtown Stillwater Traffic Operations Study, has been selected for the T H 36 Partnership Study A scope of services has been developed by staff from Stillwater, Oak Park Heights, Washington County, and Mn/DOT that emphases identification of local impacts of alternative intersection or interchange configurations for the three T H 36 intersections between T H 5 and T H 95 (A copy of the scope is attached ) The study analysis will address local traffic, business, pedestrian, emergency services, and other impacts throughout the study area from T H 5 to T H 95 and from CSAH 12/Myrtle Street south to CSAH 14 To help ensure that the study accurately reflects local concerns, considerations, and consensus, the Stillwater Planning Commission and the Oak Park Heights Planning Commission will be asked to serve together as a Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) to guide the study Through joint monthly meetings, beginning in December, this PAC will be asked to identify relevant issues, identify potential alternatives, and to evaluate study findings, and to make a consensus recommendation to the two cities, the county, and to Mn/DOT regarding preferred intersection designs The study is scheduled to be completed by June of 2002 During the course of the study, two public open houses will provide forums to identify issues, review study analyses, and gather perspectives regarding alternatives and their identified effects (impacts and benefits) Meetings will also be scheduled with key stakeholders (such as businesses and schools) and to provide occasional briefings of the two city councils The study will cost $125,000 Mn/DOT will provide $100,000 of this amount, with $25,000 to come from the two cities and county Washington County will pay $10,000, leaving $7,500 to be covered by each of the two cities Actions Requested 1 That the Stillwater City Council pledge the City's support for and participation in the T H 36 Partnership Study, 2 That the Stillwater City Council request that the City's Planning Commission assume the responsibility of serving as the city's representatives on the T H 36 Partnership Study's Policy Advisory Committee, and 3 That the Stillwater City Council adopt a resolution that will authorize an expenditure of up to $7,500 for the T H 36 Partnership Study 474/6/ t y 0 1OM 112001 WORK TASKSAND PERSON HOUR ESTIMATE PAGE I 0T0I a39 I99 NOIld90-1 90 ZT T0, TT/OT CLIENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT TH 36 IRC PARTNERSHIP STUDY TASK NO WORK TASK DESCRIPTION 10 PROJECT MANAGEMENT (64) I 1 Coordinate and organize work, document discussions end decisions prepare meebng agendas end minutes SUBTOTAL TASK 1 2 0 DATA COLLECTION / BASE MAPPING (24) 21 Assemble wising base mapping beyond existing corridor bouidaries up to Myrtfa Street on North CSAH 14 on South TR 5 !nib on West. and TH 951New Bridge on East 2 2 Conduct field review to identify ptysicai / environmental constraints (new plats andlor budding tocatbns) Update base mapping 2 3 Assemble andlreview previous studies Inducting TH 36 Corridor Study Stillwater Bridge Supplemental Drell EIS community oomprehensive plans end current land use plans 2 4 Data Co isogon (24) Collect L p b (our addrbonal tube counts Consultant Re I aonsibd rhea Assemble data col acted by MrvDOTlPartners MrdDOTiParinl r Resoonslblllies Provide prevous studies concept layouts and land use plans (In electronic formal P1rcrostabon Arcview). Provide personnel to conduct travel lime runs and or additional inberseotlon counts SUBTOTAL 3 0 LAND USE STUDY (41) TASK 2 3 1 Using adopted oaaeprehenslve plans and Issues/redevelopment goats identified in stakeholder meetings develop a future land use scenario (2020) to be used to evaluate Interchange concepts, including Irail=operations analysis Assumes creation of one 2020 bnd use nap for review by the Policy Advls I Comm Nee. 3 2 Provide one Illustrative plan -view stretch of the preferred access and land use altemabve that shows intersedioMnterchange configuration development patterns and two perspective sketches of development types (to be completed after Task 6 0) Consultant Re Inonsibi dies Prepare map showing future land use scenario for discussion by Policy ArMsoryCommittee Prepare illustrative sketches for use during alternatives evaluation phase "ESTIMATED PERSON -HOURS"" File mdtTH36subarearevxls ESTIMATED PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE SR PROF PROF TECHNICAL CLERICAL TOTALS FEE O 4 20 D 0 2 28 O 4 20 0 0 2 26 $1.80e 95 .rry co or r LO ZT RHI TOOZ/TI/OT 0 2 4 30 0 0 36 cn co N r o O 4 8 10 30 0 52 r 0 cn O 4 10 10 0 0 24 H 7d� 2 0 8 0 16 0 26 to .,o 0 H 2 10 30 50 46 0 138 18 467 78 4 4 4 20 20 8 0 56 10 30 0 40 0 84 S•NSULTINGGROUP INC ENGINEE•D PLANNERS MINNE MN t�2001 WORK TASKS AND RSON •HOUR ESTIMATE • AGE 2 0T0T Z8S TS9 NOIlti901 CLIENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT TH 36 IRC PARTNERSHIP STUDY TASK NO WORK TASK DESCRIPTION hi WDOT+Per tner Resaonsibdchess. Partners Io conduct additional Internal rreebngs as needed to faafitate decisions regarding future land use scenario File mdITH36subarearsv xis " ESTIMATED PERSON HOURS "" ESTIMATED PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE SR PROF PROF TECHNICAL CLERICAL TOTALS FEE SUBTOTAL TASK 3 8 14 50 20 48 0 140 59,237 10 4 0 CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES (15) 4 1 Dom ment (map larmat) TH 36 subarea Isst.es based on stakeholder 1 3 0 4 30 0 38 meetings Including safety connectivity delays aesthetics lard use etc 4 2 Doot,ment exist ng and future conditions as Identified by previous studies 1 3 10 20 0 0 34 including traffic volumes growth trends safety issues diversion patterns Icenbfy any changes 10 conditions based on updated lratlk/safely information 4 3 Doc ntent exish rg conditions in Technical Memorandum 2 8 20 20 t0 0 58 4 4 Based an idenbled problems physical constraints Icca1 and regional goals 2 6 10 16 0 0 34 and objectives develop potential access concept aitemabves to TH 36 (Assumes maximum of 6 Initial alternatives ) 4 5 Evaluate potential access alternatives on a conceptual level to determine 8 18 20 40 10 0 94 what concepts are feasible how the concepts accommodate local and f3r1 regional traffic patterns (assumng two scenarios current river crossing and new SL Gobi Rig er Crossing) and what general Impacts the concepts have on land use r--• 4 6 Prepare presentation of concept altemaUves for Protect Management 4 4 8 8 8 0 32 r—` Committee 1- O Consultant Responsibilities Assemble Issues map for public meetings, 2 develop technical memorandum docume-ding ®fisting conditions. I j In/DOT/Partner Resnansiblrtes Mn/DOT 10 provide tribal Issues map 10 O SRF based on fnrbal meetings wrin partners MrvDOT to review and Q1 comment on existing condttons memorandum SUBTOTAL TASK 4 1e 38 68 108 58 0 290 519 639 89 80 ZT MIL T007./TT/OT MN IS OTOT Z8S TS9 XYd NOIIVIHOdSI VHI SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS MINNEAPOUS MN 10/11/2001 WORK TASKS AND PERSON -HOUR ESTIMATE PAGE 3 0T0T Z89 TS9 NOIld901 CLIENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT TH 36 IRC PARTNERSHIP STUDY File red1TH36sub6rearevxls "' ESTIMATED PERSON HOURS`'' TASK NO WORK TASK DESCRIPTION 5.0 ALTERNATIVEIEVALUATION(05) 51 Assemble MrvDOTs mom detailed concept drawings for up to three access 0 0 0 40 20 0 60 altemalnes anderdentrfy potential modifications/options for land use 5 2 Conducl more detaied evaluation on mosi promising access altarnatwes (assumes a maximum of 3 alternatives) Analysis would include Assess L attic operellons i pa:.is (see Task 8 bela4 ) Assoss benefits scenario Assess benefits and/or impacle to current lard uses and future land we and/or impacts to pedestrian n and/or other modes Develop planning -level estimates of improvement costs. Idunhfy potential obnbuctluns to bnplemelUna different oltrxnaUvus Identify potential safely Issues andlorcoricems Assess effeds to TH 36 achievement of IRC performance targets 11 5 3 Assess benefilslandror impacts to Individual stakeholder concems List of 8 6 42 0 0 0 58 concerns to be assessed and level of analysis to be determined following Xi X stakeholder meetings Topics Identified e1 this time Include Effects to Lakedew Hospital emergercy v vehicles 3 MI Effects to Deer Pass Road 5 4 Assemble evaluation mlo coripadson matrix document analysis. findings 4 12 24 0 0 4 44 ESTIMATED PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE SR PROF PROF TECHNICAL CLERICAL TOTALS FEE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 4 16 20 0 a 42 90 at TO, TT/OT and recommen labons Consultant Resconslbllibes Anal/ta existing ooncepls minded by Mn'DOT Concepts will be evaluated 8 i documented in comparison matrix. MNDOTT Partner ResaonslbDtie4 Prcmde ccocepts to SRF In electronic format with UTA1 coordinate system M vDOT to assist with LWD cost analysts SUBTOTAL TASK 5 6 0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS (76) 81 Assess tragic operation at critical Intersecbons including LOS queuing merge/diverge (PM analysts) Three alternation plus No -Budd under boll mdstIng and new SL Croix River Bridge conditions. SUBTOTAL 7 0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (39) S•NSULTING GROUP INC TASK 6 O 0 0 t0 0 0 10 2 2 0 30 0 0 34 U 2 n 0 0 0 It 2 2 6 e 0 0 18 2 0 4 0 0 0 6 20 30 9B 108 20 4 280 $19,477 45 1a 10 28 80 64 24 0 204 28 60 64 24 0 204 $14,072 69 ENGINEE•D PLANNERS taNNFllip MN c TOOZ/TT/OT NOIIVIHOdSMV LL 1t 001 WORK TASKS AND SON -HOUR ESTI? IATE •AGE4 c OTOT Z85 T59 NOIld901 CLIENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT TH 36 IRC PARTNERSHIP STUDY He mdfTH36subarearev xis ' 'ESTIMATED PERSON -HOURS " ESTIMATED TASK NO WORK TASK DESCRIPTION PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE SR PROF PROF TECHNICAL CLERICAL TOTALS FEE 7 1 Identify shod -term and long4erm changes that would be required to work 2 toward Implementation of the preferred aooess4and use aitemattve 7 2 Identity responsibilities of agencies and steps required to resolve additional 2 issues 7 3 Tran.portatlon Planning (78) SRF will review alment county highway designations In the study area end apply establuhed Jurisdictional criteria to determine potential jurisdictional changes In the area. Cons.rltant Responsibilities Identfy Implementation strategies and responsibilitles De/alcp metro' Identifying hay existing county routes fit Junsdicional criteria J.1vDOTiPariner RespansibiTtes Review sr. pplemeniabon strategies and responsibilities SUBTOTAL TASK7 8 6 10 10 0 0 28 6 10 10 0 0 28 0 24 0 0 0 32 12 12 44 20 0 0 88 56,762 70 8.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (58) .�.,t `-. 81 Coordinate and lead discussions of Technzal Advisory Commdlee (TAC) 5/ � f" 2D 50 50 0 20 C 140 meetngs Assume four (4) meetings f`� 8 2 Coordinate and lead diswsslons at tip to eight (8) Po8cy Advisory )/4-i 10 28 20 0 20 0 78 Corneille(' meetings Coordinate and lead diswsslons at two seta of stakeholder meetings Initial 0 20 20 0 0 0 40 set to be done at beginning of study to determne key Issues second set to bo done to discuss alternatives Conduct two open -house meetin ,one to confirm Issues end the second to provide Input Into Mal alternatives Attend up to lour (4) additional meetings with stakeholders and+or City Council r eeUngs to address spa viand use Issues and discuss alternatives ana ysts. 8 6 Provide elecronic graphics ties on Eri B 163 B 183altemakves fix local (Cnewspaper Insert. ` / _ �� Cons4ltant Resnons8dn]es Develop presentation materials Attend and (� lead discussions at meetings Review end comment on meeting minutes Provide electronic files from graphics boards for newspaper Inserts kimDOTlPartner Responsibilities Prepare meeting agendas. Coordinate meeting locatlons/9adlhtles Document meeting discussions prepare meeting minutes Prepare layout end make graphical revis ons for newspaper Insert Arrange for production and distribution of newspaper Insert 0 20 20 0 50 0 90 12 24 12 0 10 0 58 0 4 10 0 0 0 14 TOOZ/Ti/OT NOI.LV1IOdSNV L SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ENGINEERS PND PLANNERS MINNEAPOLIS PIN 1W1112001 WORK TASKS AND PERSON -HOUR ESTIMATE PAGE 5 0T0T Z8S TS9 NOIld901 90 ZT TO, TT/OT CLIENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT TH 36 IRC PARTNERSHIP STUDY TASK NO WORK TASK DESCRIPTION File mdtTH36subare8rev xls ""ESTIMATED PERSON HOURS"" ESTIMATED PRINCIPAL. ASSOCIATE SR PROF PROF TECHNICAL CLERICAL TOTALS FEE 9 0 FINAL REPORT (59) 91 SUBTOTAL TASKS Prepare 12 copies of the draft report that summarizes sludy process analysis Endings end recommendations Obtain comments from 7AC and make re talons 42 146 132 0 100 0 420 $32,450 71 4 12 60 10 30 6 122 9 2 Prepare 75 00 lies of the final report one photo -ready cop) end are 1 2 0 4 4 4 15 eledronrc copy Consultant R IaansIDilitles Develop draft and final report Mn/DOT,Padn I ResoonsibIlides Review and comment an draft report SUBTOTAL TASK 5 TOTAL ESTIMATED PERSON HOURS AVERAGE HOURLY PAYROLL RATES ESTIMATED LABOR ESTIMATED OVERHEAD COST TOTAL ESTIMATED LABOR AND FIXED FEE ESTIMATED OVERHEAD DIRECT NON SALARY EXPENSES TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE 14 60 14 34 10 137 88,892 72 117 294 502 384 330 10 1723 S47 00 535 25 $26 25 32300 $19 00 $15 00 S5 499 00 510 363 50 $15,277 50 $8 83200 36 270 00 324,3 00 546 482 00 13206% S81 384 13 $107 866 13 12% S12 943 94 $4 170 00 $124 980 07 acccocao TOOZ/TT/OT NOIIYIHOdStY L MN IS 0T0T Z92 T29 SINSULTING GROUP INC ENGINEE•D PLANNERS MINNEA. MN c 1.2001 WORK TASKS ANORSON HOUR ESTIMATE *PAGE 6 OIOI Z85 I99 NOIld001 CLIENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SUBCONSULTANT PROJECT TH 36 IRC PARTNERSHIP STUDY File mdtTH36subarearev xis "" ESTIMATED PERSON HOURS" TASK NO WORK TASK DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED PRINCIPAL ASSOCIATE SR PROF PROF TECHNICAL CLERICAL TOTALS FEE ESTIMATE OF DIRECT NON -SALARY EXPENSES MILEAGE 3000 Miles ® 0 345 per mile $1 035 PARKING $1 0 PRINTING Report and Plan Pnntng 12 Draft Copies ® $25 00 5300 75 Final Copies ® 52500 51 875 Cannon Colo( Copes (200 copes) 5200 COMMUNICATIONS Mad Express Etc 550 SUPPLIES Graphic Arts Supplies S50 Photographic Supplies 550 MISCELLANEOUS (Obfique AIr Photos Helicopter Flight) S600 —I EST MATED DIRECT NCNSALARN EXPENSES $4 170 Rn ZT IIA.T. Tnn7./TT/nT N3h IS 0T0T Z92 TS9 YV3 NOIIVJ OdSNVLL SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS MINNEAPOLIS MN • Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Date November 8, 2001 Subject Swimming Pool Ordinance ft- This item was continued for discussion from your October meeting The Building Official has provided additional views on the need for an ordinance revision • • r • • • MEMORANDUM TO Planning Commission FR Sue Fitzgerald, City Planner DA October 8, 2001 RE Aboveground Swimming Pool Ordinance Amendment Attached for your review is a revision to the Construction of Swimming Pools Ordinance (Sec 33-2 Construction of swimming pools) The change tightens up the fence requirement for all pools in all districts, as Subd 14 Fences will be added to the text of Subd 16 Aboveground swimming pools Recommendation Review draft changes and set public hearing on Construction of Swunming Pools ordinance for Planning Commission meeting of November 12, 2001 Attachment Draft ordinance N o o oit' • Subd 7 Main outlets Pools must be equipped with facilities for completely emptying the pool and effecting surface drainage (by gravity if elevations permit) The drainage system must be constructed m conformance with the provisions of the state plumbing code and under the supervision of a licensed plumber, and shall not discharge directly on the land of an adjoining neighbor or in a manner that threatens or endangers fish or wildlife Subd 8 Water supply Water supplies serving all swimming pools must be safe, sanitary and be aacceptable to the public health authonty The installation of the pool water supply piping and connection to the source of supply must be under the supervision of a licensed plumber Subd 9 Electrical requirements All electncal installations provided for, installed and used in conjunction with residential swimming pools must conform to the state electncal code and must be inspected and approved by the state electncal inspector No current -carrying electncal conductors must cross residential swimming pools, either overhead or underground, or within 15 feet of a pool, except as necessary for pool fighting or pool accessories Subd 10 Heating requirements Permits are required for all heating units used in conjunction with swimming pools Installation must be made by installers licensed by the city and m accordance with any lawful code in effect at the time of installation Subd 11 Pressure relief valves Pool contractors must certify that they have examined the construction site with respect to the water table level and potential soil saturation If it is determined to be necessary, in the opinion of the building official, pools must be designed and constructed with under -drain systems and pressure relief valves to prevent pool flotation Subd 12 Shielding lights Lights used to illuminate swimming pools must be arranged and sluelded to reflect light away from adjoining properties Subd 13 Location All swimming pools or appurtenances must be located m the rear yard at a distance of at least ten feet from any property line Subd 14 Fences All swimming pools must be completely enclosed by a non - climbing fence All fence openings or pomts of entry into the pool area must be equipped with gates The fence and gates must be at least four feet m height and constructed of a minimum no 11 gauge, woven -wire mesh, corrosion -resistant matenal or other matenal approved by the building official All gates must be equipped with self -closing and self -latching devices placed at the top of the gate or otherwise be inaccessible to small children All fence -posts must be decay or corrosion -resistant and set in concrete bases or other suitable protection The • • • MEMORANDUM TO Steve Russell, Community Development Director FROM Cindy Shilts, Building Official �',1 DATE November 8, 2001 SUBJECT Fence Restnctions I believe fences should be required around above -ground pools since the Building Department has seen numerous occasions where the ladder was not removed from the side of the pools when not in use, creating a hazardous condition It would be near impossible to enforce the removal of the ladders on above -ground pools, therefore, I recommend the fence ordinance be amended to require fences around all pools regardless of in- or above -ground pools r • Memo To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director /v Date November 8, 2001 Subject Annual Review of Trolley and Andiamo Special Use Permits Notices have been sent to the Trolley and Andiamo owners requesting an annual report of activity and any changes in operation or suggested changes for the coming year The annual review is required as a part of the special use permit Recommendation Set annual reviews for December Planning Commission Meeting •