HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-09-10 CPC PacketIj1Water.
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF STILLWATER
NOTICE OF MEETING
The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, September 10, 2001 at 7 p m in the
Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street
Approval of Minutes of August 13, 2001
AGENDA
Public Hearings - 7 p m
1 Case No SUP/01-40 A special use permit for a Type lI Home Occupation Cosmetologist
home based business at 2360 Walnut Creek Dnve in the RA, Single Family Residential
Distnct Ron and Patty Johnson, applicants
2 Case No V/01-41 A vanance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 0 feet requested) for
the construction on a single family residence at 1511 North Main Street in the RB, Two
Family Residential District and the Bluffland/Shoreland District John Hoeschler, _
representing Elayne Aiple, applicant
3 Case No SUP/01-42 A special use permit for Oakndge Community Church for a K-12
Christian Day School at 6950 Stillwater Blvd in the RA, Single Family Residential District
Richard Bernier, applicant
4 Case No SUP/01-43 A special use permit for a mantal arts/dance school with one office at
215 North Williams Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Sara Gilberg,
applicant
5 Case No V/01-44 A vanance to the side yard setback (25 feet required, 14 feet requested)
for the construction of a two-story addition at 120 West Wilkms Street in the RB, Two
Family Residential District Mark Balay, representing Tom and Sherry Armstrbig,
applicant - - -
6 Case No V/01-45 A variance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 2 feet requested)
for the construction of an attached 2-car garage at 726 7th Street South in the RB, Two
Family Residential Distnct Daniel and Maria Pohszuk, applicant
7 Case No V/01-46 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet requested)
for the construction of a wrap -around porch at 1003 5th Street North m the RB, Two Family
Residential Distnct Todd Sharkey, applicant
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800
1#
r
8 Case No ANN/01-02 A request for annexation of 2 5 acres of land located at 8160 Neal
Avenue in the AP, Agricultural Preservation Distnct Greg Johnson, Manchester Homes,
representing John and Rebecca Chomiere, applicant
9 Case No ZAM/01-04 A zomng map amendment to rezone 2 5 acres of land from AP,
Agncultural Preservation to RA, Smgle Family Residential at 8160 Neal Avenue Greg
Johnson, Manchester Homes, representing John and Rebecca Choimere, applicant
10 Case No SUB/01-47 A subdivision of a 2 5 acre lot m to 4 lots located at 8160 Neal
Avenue in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Greg Johnson, Manchester Homes,
representing John and Rebecca Chouuere, applicant
11 Case No V/01-48 A vanance to the font yard setback (30 feet required, 13 feet requested)
for the construction of a porch addition at 504 West Hickory Street m the RB, Two Family
Residential District Jeff Velin, applicant
Other Items
-Fence Ordinance revisions
-Comprehensive Plan -Review-
-
,J
•
•
•
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission _ _
August 13, 2001
Present Russ Hultman, chair
Glenna Bealka, Robert Gag, Dave Middleton, Karl Ranum, Paul Teske,
Darwin Wald and Terry Zoller
Others Community Development Director Steve Russell
Mr Hultman called the meeting to order at 7 p m
Approval of minutes Mr Wald, seconded by Mr Gag, moved approval of the mmutes of July 9,
2001, motion passed unammously
Case No SUP DR/01-26 This case has been tabled indefinitely
Case No SUP/01-33 A special use permit for Tom Thumb Food Market to add another pump
island at 2601 -W Orleans St in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial Distnct Mike Eichel,
Tom Thumb representative, applicant
Mr Eichel was present He noted that the additional pump was in the onginal plans Because two
years had elapsed since the ongmal permit, the applicant needed an up-to-date survey Mr
Eichel said they had worked with City Engineer Klatyon Eckles regarding the curb cut
Mr Ranum, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed
unammously
Case No SUP 01-36 A special use for a home -based sewing business at 2337 Van Tassel Court
N in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Joe and Joan Tlustos, applicants
The apphcants were present They explained that all work is done by appointments, generally
one at a time Customers park on the driveway
Mr Wald, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed
unanimously
Case No V/01-37 A variance to the front (20 feet required, 17 feet requested) and side (5 feet
required, 4 9 feet requested) yard setbacks for construction of a residence at 3213 Summer Fields
Court in the TR, Townhouse Residential District David Dorn, Senn and Youngdahl, applicant
Mr Russell noted a vanance also is needed for the porch setback (6 feet, versus the required 10
feet) Mr Dorn explained the vanances are necessary due to a mistake caused by
miscommunication with a subcontractor The mistake wasn't discovered until the structure was
all framed up Mr Ranum asked if the applicant had put mechanisms m place to prevent similar
errors in the future Mr Dorn said now rear stakes are required as well as front stakes
•
•
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
August 13, 2001
Mr Ranum, seconded by Mr Zoller, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed
unanimously
Case No V/01-38 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 14 feet requested) for
construction of a 180-square foot deck at 906 Fifth Ave S in the RB, Two Family Residential
Distnct Maunce Stenerson, representing John Prosser, applicant
Mr Prosser was present, along with attorney Scott MacDonald Mr Prosser showed a senes of
photos of neighbors' views of the nver He suggested the only thmg neighbors may object to is
the support pose for the proposed deck Mr Prosser also noted that the view of the nver was
obstructed before he cleared his lot He pointed out that the three houses to the south of his have
front setbacks of 6 5 feet or less and can barely see his house Mr Prosser also raised the issue of
the adjoining property owner, David Hartung's, deck being 3 5 feet onto the city nght-of-way
He provided surveys highlighting setbacks and encroachments on properties, including the fact
that a portion of Mr Hartung's house is on his property -
Mr MacDonald raised the issue of Mr Ranum's participation in the discussion due to Mr
Ranum's previous association with Mr Hartung when this case was first heard two and one-half
years ago Mr Ranum subsequently abstained from the discussion/vote
Mr MacDonald discussed three legal issues involved hardship, need for a vanance, and any
detrimental impact on adjacent properties Mr MacDonald bnefly addressed the first two issues,
refemng to the configuration of the lot and slope of the property as a hardship He stated the real
issue is the question of whether Mr Hartung's view is being impeded Mr MacDonald suggested
that Mr Hartung's view of the nver is there because Mr Prosser cleared his property And, he
suggested that Mr Hartung's view could be lost at any time through perfectly legal means, such
as planting of some trees He concluded that the request does not represent an unreasonable
intrusion on neighbors' views
Mr Hartung, 910 S Fifth Ave , stated the proposed deck would be a significant impediment to
this view Todd and Audrey Hanson, neighbors directly to the west, also addressed the
Commission The Hansons stated they had no objection to the deck but wanted to know when
Mr Prosser was going to remove the shed which was a condition of approval when he was
granted a vanance to construct another garage Mr Prosser said he would remove the shed as
soon as the garage is completed and agreed to have the shed removed before Nov 1
Mr Zoller noted that the Commission had considerable discussion on this request when it was
first presented and denied two years ago, he questioned what had changed in those two years
Mr Zoller pointed out that property lines and encroachment on city nght-of-way have no beanng
on the request due to the fact that in old neighborhoods, where houses were constructed over 100
years ago, many of the property lines are incorrect, with the errors compounded as additional
i
•
•
•
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
August 13, 2001
houses were built Mr Zoller summed up that in this instance, neighbors feel the request would
be detrimental to their property
Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Teske, moved to deny the request Motion passed 7-0-1, with Mr
Ranum abstaining
Case No V/01-39 A vanance to the height regulations (35 feet required, 80 feet proposed) for
construction of a memonal to Stillwater High School veterans in the Riverview parking lot, PA,
Public Administrative Office Distnct Brian Larson, Larson Brenner Architects, and Memonal to
High School Veterans Committee applicants
Present were Bnan Larson and several members of the Memonal Committee, including Dave
Swanson, Dick Olsen and Gary Wisbar Mr Larson provided a brief history of the project and
sketches of the proposed memorial Mr Olsen noted the named has been changed to Veterans
Memonal for Stillwater Area Schools, so all veterans will be remembered Mr Larson also noted _
meetings had been held with neighbors to gain their input
Mr Zoller asked about lighting Mr Larson said the intent is to light the base of the memonal so
the names can be read and said the Committee is aware of the concern that the lighting not be
intrusive Mr Larson also stated the flag will be lighted with a tightly focused fight
Mr Ranum asked if any parking spaces would be lost Mr Larson said two handicapped spaces
will be lost but replaced, he said they could re -stripe the lot if need be Mr Ranum stated he was
concerned about the height of the memonal, and stated that if the proposed vegetation doesn't
grow, the memonal will be a plain stainless steel structure
Mr Larson reviewed heights of various adjacent structures, including the Histonc Courthouse
cupola, the Cub Foods entry, and the numerous church steeples He also explained why the
height is necessary to accomplish the desired design effect Mr Larson noted that many of the
adjacent trees are 35-40 feet high, and the feeling was that the memonal ought to have some sort
of presence above the trees Mrs Bealka pointed out that Master Gardeners would be helpful for
ideas for vegetation that might grow on the structure
Mr Middleton asked about the meeting with neighbors Mr Larson stated the meeting was not
well attended, but said Gudrun Nordby of the Histonc Courthouse and Dick Kilty, Oak and
Fourth streets, both favored the design One neighbor, who resides on Fourth Street directly
across from the Riverview parking lot, was present and stated she likes the proposed design Mr
Middleton stated he, too, is concerned about the height
Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, with the additional condition
that the memonal be a maximum of 80 feet in height Motion passed 6-2, with Mr Ranum and
Mr Middleton voting no
3
•
•
•
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
August 13, 2001
Other business
• Fence Ordinance revisions — Ordinances from eight other municipalities were included for
members to review Mr Ranum talked of the importance of sight tnangles and setbacks on
corner properties There also was discussion of Stillwater's requirement to have a fence one
foot off the property line and whether such a requirement -was needed or useful for
maintenance purposes Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Wald, moved to change the ordinance to
allow fences to be placed on the property line
• Comprehensive Plan — Discussion of Chapter 3 was postponed until the September meeting
• Mr Ranum asked for clarification of the Conflict of Interest definitions
Mr Ranum, seconded by Mr Teske, moved to adjourn at 9 25 p m , all in favor
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary
1
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO SUP/01-40
Planning Commission Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 2360 Walnut Creek Road
F
Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential
Zoning Distnct RA
Applicant's Name Ron and Patty Johnson
Type of Application Special Use Permit
Project Descnption A special use permit for a Type II Home Cosmetologist home
based business
Discussion The applicant is requesting a special use permit to conduct a home
business of Cosmetology (hairdressing) The applicant will be the only employee, and
will schedule one client at a time There will be no signage All parking would be on the
applicants' dnveway The hours will be
Wed 11 am to7pm
Thur 9am to3pm
Fri 9 a m to3pm
Sat 9 a m to 12 p m (every other Sat )
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Conditions of Approval
All revisions to the approved special use permit shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission
1 Hours are between 9 a m and 3 p m Monday -Saturday
2 No additional employees
3 Minimal traffic — one client at a time
4 All customers will be scheduled by appointment
5 All parking will be on site
6 There will be no sign on the property
7 Total floor area for the business is 154 square feet which is less than 20% of the
total gross floor area of the dwelling (2088 square feet)
8 The Planning Commission shall review all complaints
Findings The proposed use will not be injunous to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the
zoning ordinance
Attachments
Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan
1
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
Case No
Date Filed
Fee Paid
Receipt No
ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED Fees
XSpecial/Conditional Use Permit 00
Variance $ i/200
Resubdivision $100
Subdivision* $100+50/lot
Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
Zoning Amendment* $300
Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $70
Design Review $25
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and eng►neenng fees (see attached)
The appl►cant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any appl►cat►on All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc )
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the
application process
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Projecta736 d V l/m..6 (tee /V V C Assessor's Parcel No Z DO 30Z0 33 cz07
(GEO Code)
Zoning District Description of Project /fQ' r <SCt/1'),
1-0-r 1, ELK /, Scuser A D A/14-TrS
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used "
Property Owner IRrnn It kf l y -% h /1.SOr- Representative
Mailing Address a Ma,IllL{-(-c c e i t Mailing Address
City - State - Zip ; /Ju)"r I /h t nna 556V Z City - State - Zip
Telephone No (p 5/- / 39— 709 a Telephone No
Signature 16G�� j f- j Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lot Size (dimensions) /6Vx /30'
Land Area
• Height of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal 2-
Accessory -ey-
Total Building floor area Lo&S( square feet
Existing square feet
Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area 74fr square feet
No of off-street parking spaces 2.
H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
5
I Patty Johnson would like to conduct my business as a Cosmetologist
(hairdresser) in my home I intend on having it fully licensed and insured I would
like to work no more than 23 hours per week I feel my business will not interfere
with the neighbors since
1 I live in a cul-de-sac with 95% of my neighbors working weekday hours
2 My house is the first house on the block, so my customers will not travel
through any of the neighborhood to get to my house
3 1 intend on working with one client at a time There will be NO signage or
other employees
4 My driveway will accommodate off street parking
5 My hours will be Wed 11 00 a m to 7 00 p m
Thur 900am to300pm
Fri 900am to300pm
Sat 9 00 a m to Noon (Every other Sat )
I have been a licensed cosmetologist for 20 years I have been an Owner
of The Golden Mirror Salon for the past 13 years My business partner and I
have decided to make some life changes Mine are to slow down and enjoy my
husband and 10 year old son
Please respect my wishes to feel somewhat of a stay at home mom who
has the esteem of being a financial supporter in the family
Thank you for your consideration
Patty Johnson
•
•
9'(
,I G
-x,8w / w"ea_ t'.'?7i17
&-V7-d
-1.7
f1/4 sM07 Of l (I-moo-7 (Qv7$5
?/99 d'� 7 Lr?/7t//'7
hSihJxl f S/ Woo?J
•
•
•
em
To Planning Commission
From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Jl�
Date September 6, 2001
Subject Request for Variance to Setback for Construction of Structure in Duplex
Residential/Bluffland Shoreland Distract (site is just north of Stillwater Yacht
Club) Case No V/01-41
This item has been advertised for a public hearing and the Commission can consider comments
It is recommended that the application be continued to your meeting of October 8, 2001 for a
related subdivision request and more complete site development information
This site is within the DNR Bluffland/Shoreland District and provides for their review and
comment
Recommendation Continuance to Planning Commission meeting of October 8, 2001
Attachments Application and plans
•
95
)� OF Amy TRACk OF
PACff,C RAJLWAy CO
•
•
a
•
4l
J
790 0
isi
CONId 3 °24 1 15" -
AMRE< ST O ZCRIPT - = . _ �- ��`-w o� =a R 289
o �
C ! I7T
1J V 1 x w
�
.t
lV
`
▪ 1
z
9
1 - . o ▪ S8 N87°323�"W_- _ PER ato- EASEMENT �.-
` � 1 ' ▪ • f00 11/R 1,Oa -- - �,
4.
�� TRACT � R tff1CRTE OF Ti TLC NO 4$ �- i x 1 `>3
- __s-�w _.� _0l - l _ - x Bye ----- c
WESTERLY SHORELINE OF THE
or
ST CROIX RIVER (LAKE ST CROIX)
AS FIELD LOCATED DECEMBER 14 1995
C124
ICE ELEVATION ON DECSABER 14,1995
(676 0 FEET)
-13SI3g QNV 63-1HDS
•
•
HOESCHLER & BEISEL LLP
/ ,TOR?EV''
John G floeschler
Ph 612 436 ,636
Fax 612 338 6600
lghoeschlei@msn con
Au6 st 77 200
Mr Sieve Russell Planner
gtilIscte CryHall
j 16 North Fourth Street
Sr111� afar, M rresota 55082
Re hiplc Property North of Mulberry Pomt Manna
Dea
282 US Trust Center
730 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis MN 55402 2444
Per our discussion Prlier + the rno- i enclose Mrs Aiple's application for a variance
from -ne re tr line sctbac k 1 equ11 ements foi any r eside ;t1ai structure to be built on hei pronert;
directly north of the r.4u1nPrry Point Mar is regara T enclose the following
1 Apr,licatiorf foal
2 Maps cc propert showing area ', question
Application fee of S 7C ,O
s recuest is basec t pon the pcoaliar ature o: she subject property and the surrounding
.lope '-ies it is Jegwri order is :,a''iC ns1y et'orlon-11c va Ow from the popery It is
occas oned 'Plough no fault of tie lartiownci t ,s *! e mrllnllani variance iecessary to solve the
proLlerr ctea*ec oy the st ict enfnlce w-n cf +1-e zoning code
As you will see fron the survey we are requesting pe-mission to establish a building
er�veione 150 wide rinning fiom the 100 front set hack line to die back hie of the property We
are not requesting a front (flyer) or sidcl rte /arta-ice While r believe ,�e should qualify foi a
iPrnr line ,,aJTance we do no +i bc:rr i ei1,b ci'cd it a protracted dispute with the DNR
We onlx desire a real line setback valiance in orae, to allow sufficient *oon, to build a single -
farm v res dencc ot1 the propert)
Mr Steve Russell
August 20 2001
Page Two of 3 hree
We de not have actual clans foi a sOecif^ vtructure because we wish to confirm in
adva le'e of that design effort that there- will be loom to build a reasonable home Therefore we
are simply asking for the vanance to confirm that .,ve cal, build an otherwise compliant structure
will„ t tl e bu 'ding envelope described On, general Diatn is to provide access from the north
over the existing access road to the piese'it Male dome No acditlo ,al railroad cioss.ng will be
real s-c I !i s ti'e ncrura, alio historic Kcress p i it r^ `his piopeity
T1,c e it re Arnie pal eel consists of almost fftee acres and stretches over 3/4 of a mile
along the St Croix River Tne present Aicie house is located it the northerly 3/4 of the parcel
and iq delineated by a forira' gate and Fels{ r , l he -'o-th sloe of the railroad crossing 1 he land
south ofille gate (the ` Sl biect") has bee', i1r'dcveloped for the oast ftf y years but in earlier times
was Tart or the industrial watcrfroni of St 1' \rarer The a id itself' is nigh enough above the liver
to be or subject to flooding The Sub,ec 3 bounded on the south by `hp no -th line of Mulberry
?on l` Martra. or, the west la; the old Nortne- 1 Pac,fL railroad tracks, or the east by fine river and
OD the north by the easterly prolongation of the lily SIO1 line bet weer Lots 13 and 14 Block 7,
Carl & Schuleriberg s Adaitlor The entr-e rle r' perty sic"uding the Subject, is withal the
city
7-lit property is zoneo RPs-Two i amll District 1 ,s served my public water and w 11
shortly be served by public sewer Tiie l _,f Jest of the property or he otlie- sidef
c ' r � e o_ Main
St`eet anti tl,e rallloa`t tracirs The of vailing setbacl' froio the river and the railroad tracks is
ectabl shed b; the Mulberry Pow,- Marina The Marina has buildings ai die edge of the river
sionc al o has de./elopes' all th-'wa, -c its boundary .vikt i,-le ra lroad
s Aie Aipies have ov-ned inic p opert / since the 1 95T s ' Flew year ago the City gave a
cordit olial use nelinit to alloy\ a narking lot aryl lasing foi' a commercial .coat, but the National
Park Service vetoed the tenuest or a ^ocb o lie grounds thai ine property deeded to be sold to a
snigle user Mille we felt that the veto was without legal basis no one wanted to spend the tune
o, mone/ requiied for a court appeal We is ;ow oeen approached by several parties
inieres'ed in pirc'lasl' g the prope o- foi a single farlhhy homestead f ik is buildable 1'he
combination o{ the 100' frond (river) setback ano a 25 rear year setback makes the property
subs'ahtraily unburldame
•
Mr Steve Russell
L->>Lus' 22', 2001
Page Three or Three
A valiance born the rear yaid setback will no- adversely affect the adjoining owner
because the railroad tracks sepaizte any s ruc u--e trom the SLbject and the tracks themselves are
ill`; e L1 ai 25 *eel from the prot,erly life
f'ie Subject is a beaul,fui piece of oro per+ / and ail parties would be best served by the
cc rstrixtio l of a stylish single faml'y nonic on ,, This would se7 its use foi the future and assure
rini a' impact upon +ne err ✓1-oiw en still ally ving meaningful economic use for the
property The Aiples have peen paying cares or th s =ope--ty fot nearly fifty years and deserve
Lo be able to realize some 'alue from
WP fheiefore rcciues+ a full Jan anc; 3 o r the lean yard sei bCCK tPat we car have
meznl-infui d scussions w th pc sslble buyers Thank you very much for your consideration
•
cc Elavrle Able
•
✓ e �, +; �! yours,
HOESCHLER & BEISEL, LLP
Joni; L r oesc�Lle=
_G F/rgb
Mr Steve Russell
August 20 2001
Page Three of Three
A iariance f-om tic rea- yaw se fact- wii' io a a'versely efect the adjoining owner
bccaise the railroad tracks senaiate any str_c ure from the Subject ane the tracks themselves are
riore thar 25 fees. from the properly line
Tape Subicct,s a beautifai piece of ororer'y ale ail parties would be best served oy the
ccnstri..ctoon of a stylish single family torn- or it This would its use for the future and assure
rr'nhlrai Impact upon fne „n ✓ironrnerr- std. allo \ring meaningful economic use for the
property The Alples have been pays 1g .area or this p-operty for Pearly fifty years ana deserve
TO be able to realize scree ralue frorr
We fheiefore redoes° d full iariance io r the rear far cl see back so that we car have
meaningful d'scussiong w tl' possible buy ei s Thank you ,ery much for your consideration
cc Eaiple
•
✓ei truly yours,
s-JOESCH Ef< & BEISEL, LLP
08/20/2001 i0 28 4308810
CITY OF STILLWATER
PAGE 02
Case No
Date Filed •
Fee Paid
Receipt No
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Fees
$50/200
$70/200
$100
$100+50/lot
.Comprehensive Plan Amendment` $500
__Zoning Amendment` $300
Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $70
____Design Review $25
*An escrow fee Is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (I e , photos, sketches etc )
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan Is required with applications Any Incomplete application or supporting material will delay th
application process
Address of Project IS = t
Zoning District k r2-
err
f J ri U R if 4hl l9 50u r ti (Jr--Thc- C 5 r i 0-.L1 /I, l 1.4 :e r d 1 � r 77 5 c. a yg '� ..� 1 1 ro Ef6it� A� u.�c`i�(
S C )i-, 7j d L.� a4 -�t r & ► $ �c G.�.{ � e l Add , e o 1'It. C,y, t C 5 'T
"I herebystate he foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submitted herewith fn all
respects to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file
permit If it is granted and used "251.,„,-1 6 /4)ec.`tC,-.
Special/Conditional Use Permit
V Variance
Resubdivlsion
Subdivision*
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
_)6 Tit 111 -w i'- - Assessor's Parcel No
(GEO Code)
Descnption of Project t aye C°it r e rl uE 114(4%,,.,i ?orilr
Lot Size (dimensions) Eele x
Land Area e //t)bdr ' )
Height or Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Z.74,'$ i L `' r Pi-t_
P operty Owner ,c'.. --, < f� w.c
F /
Mailing Address /-5 / 3J r/7/►io Sit ti ling Addres 1730 Szc,-,d , ,,►e Sc , -Sk 21
City - State - Zip ►/116,� i-e i- J 14 (a) S3a. F, City - State - Zip l ris', Bit et; SS cr a 4 - L it-4 Ci
Telephone No 6 -9% -. 3 - 0 ) k Telephone No 6, E Z rf 3 t2 3�, .`
Signature Signature
Representative
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
Proposed square feet
Paved impervious Area square feet
No of off-street parking spaces
Icy
f I
— ry 1. I _ ,1— I+ — 1 I L-__ I
E. T.]
L
$ t J I
r146 4 09
sti-
S IU'JY.L-
P C
4/14wrsar4
N'/SCD s N
No, 95
i
rJ
A1N TRARAIL 1 AY CC
CK o 1
(o �
, — iR -7/t23;9234 191 75/1'
o 1
L3QI2Qij
v0
_, o
____,_„:
r
r
VNJ 7.4
N
o {
NJ
�Q rr'A, cn
o {� / �E
2 25 % i �S80° N�%°32r��r'yy/
o �� Res - !`, / °p 3� 100
i3,� I Q/,, TRACT CERTIFI�4TE OF
— — 93 00 ,
O
iN3YVf1N0Y1 NOM 13S
WESTERLY SHORELINE OF T-IE
SST CROIX RIVER (LAKE ST CROIX)
AS FIELD LOCATED DECEMBER 14 1995
ICE ELEVA 'ON ON DECEMBER 4 1995
6'60 FEET)
-41
T TEE
NORTHERN
J
MAIN srF
ROA)WAY ASEMENT PER IN 5S PC 00
VO 48
Op 75 00 0
m
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO SUP/01-42
Planning Commission Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 6950 Stillwater Blvd
Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential
Zoning District RA
Applicant's Name Richard Bernier
Type of Application Special Use Permit
Project Descnption A special use permit for Oakndge Community Church for a
K-12 Chnstian Day School
Discussion
The applicant is requesting a special use permit to conduct a K-12 Christian day
school at Oakridge Community Church In the past Oakridge Church hosted the
District 834 sponsored Adventure Club program School hours will be 8 00 a m
to 3 30 p m The calendar year will run from September 4, 2001 to May 31,
2002 There will be no school buses, the students will car pool Approximately
35 students are expected to attend the school There will be no extenor signage
for the school
Conditions of Approval
1 All changes to the approved special use permit shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission
2 The Planning Commission shall review all complaints
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Findings
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose
of the zoning ordinance
Attachments
Application Form/Letter from applicant
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Case No So P o
Date Filed
Fee Paid -=RCrICZ
Receipt No gAI30
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
DEPARTMENT
0442 6M4p Ch
Address of Project(D ry / S Assessor's Parcel No e2 0,30 a/ a6.3
G _ ,GEO Code)
Zoning District Description of Project �e 4
X Special/Conditional Use Permit
Vanance
Resubdivision
Subdivision*
Fees
$50' 0'
$70/200
$100
$100+50/lot
_,Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_Zoning Amendment* $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $70
_Design Review $25
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any apphcat,on All supporting material (: e , photos, sketches, etc) —
subm►tted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete appbcat►on or supporting material will delay the
application process
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used "
Property Owner 7r'.1,,.. _1 et,104.1,4,,,, Representative eicktid
Mailing Address ail i,4e Asnwiuc/i/ ' aot4 Mailing Address o?RS2 b/
City - State - Zip 6/0 6c44/1.1 £,/ S City - State - Zip Ik
Telephone No #4S/ — €3,39 -
Telephone No
Signature kQ,-} h .c, ,Z', Er,'c4 Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lot Size (dimensions) x
Land Area C 7 ,lcres
• Height of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal 7' /d 30
Accessory
Total Building floor
Existing
Proposed
Paved Impervious Area
No of off-street parking spaces /SD
ea Ate square feet
V3e;c3 square feet
square feet
square feet
H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
1
•
•
Stillwater Planning Commission
Attn Susan Fitzgerald
Stillwater City Planner
City Hall
216 N 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Planning Commission
This letter is written m order to request a change in the conditions of the property use permit for
Oakridge Community Church Oakridge Community Church is requesting that the use permit be
added to, to allow the use of the Church facility as a K-12 Christian Day SchooL
The Christian Day School named and incorporated in the state of Minnesota as Saint Croix
Christian Academy will be used to educate students in academic excellence with a biblical
perspective
The community will benefit from the school much like any other parochial or public education
organization In the past Oakridge Church has hosted the District 834 sponsored Adventure Club
Program. This program was run for 2 years in the Oakridge Church in this neighborhood
The school day will run from 8 00 AM to 3 30 PM
The school calendar will be from September 4, 2001 to May 31, 2002
The school will hold classes, during the year, very similar to District 834
The school inclement weather days will be based on District 834 announcements
The school will not be using buses, students will car pool There will be approximately 35 children
from grades 1°` through 10`h This represents children from approximately 20 families
Because the Oakridge Church facility meets the needs of the school, the school will be commencing
classes with out any alterations to the existing property
Thank you for hearing our request
Sincerely,
Richard Bernier
Oakridge Community Church
DeJDeJon
`5---
Saint Croix Christian Academy
•
•
•
Planning Application Review Form
Case SUP/01-43
Planning Commission Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 215 North William Street
Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential
Zoning District RB
Applicant's Name Sara Gilberg
Type of Application Special Use Permit
Project Description A special use permit for a marital arts/dance school with
one office
Discussion
The applicant is requesting a special use permit to operate a martial arts, dance
school and consulting practice The building has a total square footage of 4897
square feet The applicant will occupy 2547 square feet The remaining area of
the building is being used for an electrical company (received a special use
permit on 7/10/00)
The proposal is to offer a one -hour class in the morning (not earlier that 7 00
a m ), a noontime class, an after -school class, and classes in the evening
between 6 00 and 8 00 p m Maximum class size would be 30 students The
consulting practice would consist of administrative work on a one to one basis
The applicant's wife would conduct the dance and movement school for adults
only Classes would be once or twice a week dunng the hours the applicant
does not have classes
The applicant states in the attached letter that he does not plan of having large or
bright signage on the property, but plans to use "simple and tasteful signs"
(probably in the window) that will simply let people know that they have arrived at
their destination He states that he does not anticipate attracting business
through the use of signs It is staffs recommendation that all signage be inside
of the windows, to minimize the impact in the residential neighborhood The
parking lot has 28 spaces, 25 of the spaces are the applicants, which is required
for that type of use in the zoning ordinance
Conditions of Approval
1 Hours of operation will be between 7 00 a m and 9 00 p m
2 Any signage inside the windows shall not be lit
3 No exterior signage
•
•
•
4 All parking shall be on -site
5 All exterior lighting shall be downlit -- -
6 The Planning Commission shall review all complaints _
Recommendation
Approval as recommended
Findings
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose
of the zoning ordinance
Attachments
Application Form/ Letter
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Case No 5u 11011-13
Date Filed >.3I0
Fee Paid 4c...49100 , no
Receipt No
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
)( Special/Conditional Use Permit $5
_Variance $70/2
_Resubdivision $100
_Subdivision* $100+50/lot
Fees
Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
Zoning Amendment*
Planning Unit Development *
Certificate of Compliance
Design Review
$300
$500
$70
$25
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e, photos, sketches, etc)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with appbcat►ons Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the
application process
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 215 North William St
Assessor's Parcel No 28-030-20-31-0058
(GEO Code)
Zoning District RB Description of Project Martial Arts/dance school with 1 office
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used "
Property Owner William Properties
Mailing Address
City - State - Zip
215 N William St
Stillwater,
MN 55082
Telephone No (651) 439-7171
Signature
Lot Size (dimensions) 125x 126
Land Area 15750 sq ft
Representative Sara Gilberg
Mailing Address 215 N William St
City - State - Zip Stillwater, MN 55082
Telephone No
Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Height of Buildings 1 Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Total Building floor area
Existing 2350
Proposed 2547
Paved Impervious Area
No of off-street parking
4897 square feet
square feet
square feet
775 0square feet
spaces 2 8
H kncnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
•
•
•
Timothy A. Quarberg, M.Div., J.D.
1371 Dallager Court
Stillwater, MN
August 22, 2001
Stillwater Planning Commission
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re Special Use Permit Application for 215 North William Street
Dear Members of the Stillwater Planning Commission
I am the prospective tenant of the property located at 215 North William Street m the
City of Stillwater and am wntmg in support of the attached application for a special use
permit to operate a martial arts school and consulting practice at that site
My family and I moved to Stillwater this past June after living m Cambndge, Mmnesota
for the last seven years where I was practicing law and my wife was a hospital
supervisor While living m Cambndge I (and two of my children) were members of the
Cambridge Taekwondo Center where I attained the rank of second-degree black belt In
anticipation of our move to Stillwater, and after discovering that a Taekwondo school did
not exist in Stillwater, I determined to start a school where I could teach both Taekwondo
and Qigong (which is a practice similar to Tai Chi) Additionally, my wife Amy is
hoping to offer classes m creative movement I am also planning on using this space as
my office from which to conduct my leadership consulting busmess, HeartVenture
Consultmg After considerable searching and investigation we concluded that the
property located at 215 North William Street would be an ideal location for our school,
although a special use permit would be required
This property is located within the RB-two-family district Pursuant to Subdivision
12(2)(a) of the Stillwater Code all buildings and uses permitted by special use permit m
the RA -one -family district (as set forth in subdivision 11(2)) are penmtted by special use
permit within the RB-two-family district Among others, subdivision 11(2) includes the
following as penmtted uses by special use permit 1) Public and pnvate pnmary and
secondary schools, and 2) Other commercial uses found not to be objectionable to the
neighborhood in which they are proposed to be located I believe the use for which I am
seeking permission can be approved on the basis of these two provisions
A Public and Private Primary and Secondary Schools
It is somewhat difficult to classify a school for the martial arts as a pnvate primary or
secondary school The use I intend, however, shares with those entities a concern for the
education and edification of the youth of our community Many people are familiar with
the benefits that children expenence from practicing martial arts, especially being
•
•
•
enabled to focus and direct their energy and efforts toward positive goals I want our
martial arts school to be an adjunct educational facility for those children and families
who want to grow in ways not available through other educational opportunities As a
former pastor, and as an attorney who has had significant contact with the juvenile justice
system, I am keenly aware of how important such opportunities are Additionally, I am
hoping to offer classes and programs for cluldren dunng the after -school time of day
Because I want our students to feel like they are going to a "school" and not to a
business, and for safety concerns, I prefer to have our school located m a more residential
neighborhood than a strictly commercial area For these reasons I believe the use for
which we are applymg is at least analogous to primary and secondary schools, even if it
is not strictly within that classification
B Other Commercial Uses Not Objectionable to the Neighborhood
I believe that a martial arts school is the kind of use for the subject property that would
not be objectionable in this neighborhood Indeed, for the reasons cited above, I would
argue that such a use would be desirable I understand, however, the concerns that
residents may have for the nature of the use of this property with respect to traffic, noise
and other issues With respect to these concerns I do not anticipate that our school would
mtrude upon the neighborhood and its residents Traffic m the neighborhood would be
impacted to some extent because most students would either dnve or be dropped off for
classes That traffic, however, would be noticeable only at the beguuung and end of
particular classes and would not last for any appreciable length of time The availability
of parking spaces at the property would also minimize the need for on -street parking
Furthermore, our schedule of classes would be limited in scope during the day and would
be scheduled three or four days a week I am hoping eventually to offer a one -hour class
m the morning (not earlier than 7 00 a m ), a noontime class, an after -school class, and
classes in the evening between 6 00 and 8 00 p m My consulting practice would not
contnbute to noise or traffic inasmuch as the work I perform on the premises would
consist of administrative work and one-on-one leadership coaching In other words,
traffic would not be constant and it would not be present at times during which people
would be disturbed in their homes
I do not plan on having large or bright signage on the property that would detract from
the aesthetics of the neighborhood I hope to use simple and tasteful signs (probably m
the window) that will simply let people know that they have arrived at their destination, I
do not anticipate attractmg business through the use of signs
In conclusion, we believe that we can contribute to the continued improvement of the
Stillwater community and that this use serves that end We hope you agree and ask that
you approve this application for a special use permit at 215 North William Street
Respec3d1 ubmitted,
04.4475_
-- ,
Timothy Quarberg
•
•
•
Sue Fitzgerald
From Quarberg Tim [Tim Quarberg@westgroup com]
Sent Wednesday, September 05 2001 2 21 PM
To Sue Fitzgerald
Subject Conditional Use Permit Application
Dear Ms Fitzgerald
I received a message from Sara Gilberg regarding some questions you have
about our proposed use of the property at 215 North William Street I
understand you are wondering approximately how many students I would
anticipate being on the premises at any given time, and how many parking
spaces I would have available Additionally you are wondering how about the
hours of operation and number of students my wife's dance school may have
With respect to the martial arts school, I hope to have a minimum of 15
students enrolled shortly after beginning operation It would be unlikely
that all the students enrolled in the school would all be present at any
given class Because class size is related to the quality of instruction, I
would anticipate limiting classes to no more than 30 students per class
Whether the school will attract that many students is, of course, not
possible for me to state with certainty I understand from the Gilbergs
that there would be 25 parking spaces available in the parking lot I doubt
that I would use all these spaces because many parents drop their children
off and pick them up, thus limiting the need for parking In short, I
believe adequate off-street parking exists
With respect to my wife's activities, her plans are considerably less
ambitious than mine in that she would probably offer dance and movement
classes for adults only and probably only once or twice a week during hours
that I do not offer classes Again, I believe there is adequate parking to
serve any students who participate in any class she might offer
In general, I do not anticipate having heavy traffic to the property because
the nature of the activities we hope to offer are not the sort to have
constant comings and goings And, because this would be a new business, I
cannot predict how many students I will actually have Also, I will start
out offering classes only three (3) evenings per week but hope to offer more
sessions if demand is there However, I would not want to (and could not
afford to) limit my hours of operation beyond stating that I would not
anticipate having classes before 8 00 a m or ending classes after 9 00 p m
In no event would I imagine that traffic would ever rise to a level of
becoming a nuisance
I hope this is responsive to your questions If I can be of any more help
please do not hesitate to contact me You can reach me by replying to this
email or by calling me at 351-5343
Sincerely,
Timothy A Quarberg
+-S , l 1 1 M
fl
1"r dy-10 f9V
/ -.7) 9/ -77, ° ppi
10 /( ►b b(�J bu, p-as od Q.,d
'ia
l u 1 01.40.3
rP
epika
Itn. wos p
I -
_ 1 C
i
5
$1`
�
't
—] L
C,1 `V••Imc
'.r — wv1t6 z-'rrr
I
1?-
-
-
t
-
F
0
---415---u)
49
1407
1 408y'
401 1404
`.. ,
726 710
1 _ .__.
704
W
451
- ---
Cl
Ei HP-
--
• 4
A LINDEN
t
181.5 316
311 1 •
\NORTH b
I, , ~ —co
•'717 709iP
0
0
•
--
• c\I
titi
1j.
"'•
ti
•
• o
0
--
�03
•
I a
1
MULBERRY
817
234
235
234
2 1
238
229
•
t
232
230
.29
228
t
228
225
2z8
1 _
t225
',
216t
•
22
1219
' 241
.: ,�,
`\'
2181
1 •
-218r
t213
214
W
; -
STrFr
0
211
•
208
207
2'10
205
208
t
0
N
c�
r°
c�
'-
....
202
t
-�
204
1129
1202
RiE
W
_ WES
-
j
W
t 1241
1123
126
12
WEST RICE ST
1
8
z
• 120
_
.
VERETT
•
•11.
tt
116
. 1 —
1 i 1 tT4
t
-
4
•11-71
—
116
, •
1618--
t --1
-- f
6041
—
t t 1 . 1
111113138
•- _109 11b.
718 ' *o4
STREET
t
•
�jki3,--.s-�
1
NORTH
t
—1— — _ --
•
jd
1S
J
•
o
lc-
t
ti
- _
Location Map
813_
t•
Fr
•1/10
R_IW WOW R19W
R_'W R_ IW RIOW
Vicinity Map
0 172
1 1
Scale in Feet
01,3� 0,
.w
The _ynwa>wam
waawn
m0,0010 br,Yms
Prom .110.00
0,01 baudc0
s
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO V/01-44
Planning Commission Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 120 West Wilkins Street
Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential
Applicant's Name Mark Balay, representing Tom and Sherry Armstrong
Type of Application Variance
Project Description Revised — A variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet
required, 11 feet requested) for the construction of an addition
Discussion
The applicant is requesting a variance to rear yard setback to construct a 2 story,
2000 square foot addition The addition will connect the garage and the house,
have a kitchen, laundry room, bedrooms and bathrooms Existing topographic
site conditions and circulation within the house prevent the addition to be located
elsewhere
Conditions of Approval
1 The addition shall be similar in architectural style, colors and materials as
the main structure
2 Drainage from the roof to remain on site
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Findings
1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner,
exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits
and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance
2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and
in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special
privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors
3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detnment to
adjacent property and not matenally impair the purpose and intent of this title or
the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan
Attachments Application Form
Planning Admm Form
Page 1 of 2
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 430-8820
n
Action Requested
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or Special Use Permit
Design Review
Planned Unit Development*
Variance
Comprehensive Plan Amendment*
Zomng Amendment*
Subdivision*
Resubdivision
Total Fee
Case No
Date Filed
Fee Paid
Receipt No P L gq
v
Fee
of — `ill
$70
$50/$200
$25
$500
$70/$200
$500
$300
$100+$50/lot
$100
*An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see Step 3,
Filmg the Apphcation)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting
material submitted m connection with any application
Address of Project
Zoning Distract
i I 0 i frtygr .s-r,
5-60),)Kiii H L) \
Assessor's Parcel No
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Description of Project
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the
best of my knowledge and belief true and correct If further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted used"
Property Owner i DM 7 4 t P. t It A �(`N.' 14•4@ esentahve
Mailing Address 3 pDi ,r�`avi fie Bo �s {D tdd ge TX 7f `$/
Telephone No 2 r Telephone No
Signature �fi.� ..; Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lot Size (dimensions4x ISO Total building floor Ar
Land Area 2'f, -{ g 1 �.Q :FT i ll
Height of Buildings Stone-L-Feet2&-c
APLe 44f (5`1.16T11,JC I6J‘.
http //www ci stillwater mn us/cityhall/departments/comm_dev/planform html
sq ft
Proposed 5:isE)0 sq ft
2Q___ sq ft
Existing -3j C)
8/22/01
Mark S Balay, AIA
S t I I I w a t e r M i n n e s o t a
110 East Myrtle Street Suite 100
Stillwater Minnesota 55082
(651) 430-3312
8/23/00
City of Stillwater
Steve Russell
216 N Fourth St
Stillwater MN 55082
Dear Steve
7 tom. !
kJ)" A
AMIIINCTS
T42
�2
Michael E Balay, AIA
Indiana p o l I s I n d i a n a
6801 Lake Plaza Drive Suite C 305
Ind:anapohs Indiana 46220
(317) 845 9402
Enclosed are the design proposal matenals you requested on our submittals for the Armstrong Residence at
120 W Wilkins
Proposed improvements
Two story addition on the north end of the existing house
Variance request
The dimensions of the proposed addition are shown on the plans as 14 from the property line
Option A/We request a variance that this yard be considered a side yard
Option B/ We request a rectangular variance of 19'for a distance of 66 to the rear yard so that the
proposed addition can be placed in that area, as shown on our plans attached
Hardships _ 1) Existing Topographic site conditions
2) Existing Construction of wall, garage and house as histoncally placed on platted lot
3) Proper consideration for histoncal neighborhood development and existing open
space
Let me know if you need additional info
•
24 25 213 27 28
m07,
I �
It!) (oek)
✓'
■
24 5
4/
27
28 29 30
Obi
5
!o)
j0126)
01211
4/
25
mA,
011.2(
✓' ✓7
28 28 29 30
to%) .. m141 24.1 6
37
0
150
2
mb)
05
LET
4
2 24112
J•�7
5 1
2411) 2
8
e m..)
2472
CO - 50 aM
2
r 10W
3
2` ,58. 4
i0o 5o _I
5
6
Location Map
f -I
I
F.
8
841- 0
8
m®' 8
B0 7
75
8 4 3 8 8 4 3
cc m871 58 m14a
LU
LL _ 50 150 797 50
_
f0) ( STREET DEDICATED PER PLAT ) EAST
tY
0
Z
60
NW
1-
F-
150
6
150
8 l,s
8
R
8
tY
0)
8
4
mel
150
222
WEST STILLWATER AVE
m
150
• 6
2
50
2 8
3
mR3
100
8
WEST WILKINS STREET
50 50
3 400 Co 05
6 i 1
So/4a 41
tF
59 mbl
150
150
0
2
H
24123)
4
2.114
0',
cc
0
LL
150
WEST ASPEN STREET
I8
20 150
1 R1
m81) 8
150
8 5
/ 4
1051 ) ✓ .. 50
1
3
8 • 4 5---"*.3 8 R 4 4,''' mile
cc
0
Z
50
So
2 8 R 5 ,�7 5 2
8 I
8 n 6
24114
Y 78
f
so
202
ARL
11
70 2
0 )
150
758
8 6
mhl
(0008)
7 8
5
92110)
73
8 4 ✓ �)3
77 7 150
EAS
721
m41
6
8
70
3
1•4)
702
EAST ASPEN STIR'
1 70
R 6
8
4-4
150
,
f�5 CARLI
R_IW R_'0W RI9W
R_W R_IW R_'OW
Vicinity Map
0 160
r
Scale in Feet
�
4 9 *corn
Ow
a. W..ywCowry Woo
:'�rw ...u.m ra....
On.. only W....aarCom'y ea
mrow W.O.O..r.aarty 2.0.w m-. ),Io(0S
ASy*U.man,
rm4m
�..m ana
n.5o 7v.m CO. 22 200
KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC
LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING
721 OLD HIGHWAY 8 N.W
NEW BRIGHTON. t®MIESOTA 55112
851-831-0351
FAX 551-1331-8805
LEGEND
1h
oaeta Oonan UE
O01aa WO? MLYATEI
Page POLL
MTIR WANE
Elle= lean
TIIDIIW< RWn
£Staid RAS1 WMIQE
WA. 001
ar010 ONEID A SuPeC a
NW= aerie SWAMI
ONO= IMIENSOI melee
MING tie llr Seer
DONS NOma 0Q1MOR Ae
uuel •
Doe® SIT ow rause
wet car We® IN ER 1s10?
.411
gig
l�
r
AQN&TL�ONG MIDENCE
120 WEST WILKINS STREET
CITY OF STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA -
(SEE LEGAL CEICRIPION Bt1DM)
0010 2
Its 13714)
N.���
it/�\`}
j ••11'11•� \1' �
1)` � h.,i _
411,
.*a'1� h1111 �ihi�l
9 r--
y 1 willr."
if*
-J
. 89'40'0V E 200.00
i.ftrr�:
,
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
111137 ta,571)
as 1aD01Q1D1
t
wuwD Mw STRAP
NTH UM NLa
BC Saki A t
1 n sar1M or
CORNER
•
2
trace rllomml
S T
(ea eon a ewK eQ 000 mac a mlmDseq
2.
A POKE IN NIT N►
OF DC EAST IK6
2. BOON 12
i
PINT OF BEGINNING
OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A Parr 100 MT MT OF
110 SOWN= 03ee1 r
moat u
PREPARED F025
R. 111OILAS & CFERYL A. ARIAS
120 NEST WILKINS STREET
STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082
C/o PURCELL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
110 EAST MYRTLE STREET #102
STILLWATER. It TA 55082
PHONE 851-430-0778
1 seal mDM9 20 OUT
BASS Fie 1.11112001
n
areacom
len FOR B1M11o2
Tr an OF ref WORM
AT 1E CORM OF Esr
Erse SWEET PO am
seer mo n s
o avwt0ON OPINIQat
art r inalesl
ONION MERV&- 11e07
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 3141197
AB that part of Leta Teo (2) and Throe (3)
of Block Twelve (12) In Call & Scwdsnbarg e
Menke to Stillwater am eater bounded as folo
at a pant on the South tine of
Lot tides (3) in Block Rodin (12) of Cart &
Sdwienburq s Addition to Stillwater according
to the recorded plat thereof and of record
in the OfRee of Ilse Rester of Deeds In and
fr sold Waahtngton County, One Hundred (100)
feet West of the Southeast coma of said
Lot Three (3) thence naming Northafy and
and Ares es wit(3) to said Black One Hundrthe East Me of Lots Too ed and
y ( ) feet to a paint One Hundred (100)
feat Weal of the East 1h0e of said Lot Two
(2) thence Westerly and parallel with the
South tine of sold Lot Two (2) Fifty (50) feet
to the West the of sold Lot Two (2). thence
Southerly Wong the West 1Yro of saki Lots
Two (2) and Three (3) and with the
East UN of said tate Twoend Three
Oise Hundred and Fifty (150 2fest to the (3)
South One of said Lot tees (3) theme
Easterly along the South Rae of weld Lot
Throe (3) Filly (50) feet to the place of
beginning cod oleo Lot Four (4) and the
South half of Lot Five (5) In Block 12 of
Call & Sdnde,Mwp aAddilon to Stillwater
Wallington County. Minnesota.
PROPERTY TY AREA a991 SO. FT
t 0.6885 ACRES
NOTE SUBJECT RESIDENCE WAS UNOERCORIG
RETIOVAD01f AT THE TINE OF THIS 9JRVEY
AND OCROMONS SHOWN HEREON ARE AS THEY
DUSTED ON THE DAZE OF THE FETD SURVEY
OF MAY 11 2001.
VON
,.. MEN awn sahT VMS Meaty PIN•
� d' aR wart tat NiiSM® Mr WI ob
nNMPI 1 INAT
01 a y 11300? FAY .
Where l Meet set OF ME se
or imam
ISTiOc. `?.I
I'
r
•
O
1
0 0 0 _
nD
1
OS
11
s
Oems am our oasts is.
71
OF
JO
{
3
�1 rf.: - 0
1
aysi, \ - \
yrigtamesewl,
\e
eitri
cogiraiakb
1=
op
1.4'r Ct
•
gi
22,
OF
1
a
4TH STREET NORTH
1
1
0
e cc&
A[was K- Mai 'rss Roca le,
% t i l l el II °°° t elk
'w�I VRICV
DATA
mr in
au® w
5
Dag
De
MEM=
,, ` \
eWM
fil a
:MN i
MN WOW.BALAY
ID
1,01 IR
uoeen
fit0141311
n
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO V/01-45
Planning Commission Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 726 Seventh Street South
Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential
Zoning Distnct RB
Applicant's Name Daniel and Maria Poliszuk
Type of Application Variance
Project Descnption A variance to the front yard setback (10 feet required, 2 feet
requested) for the construction of an attached 2-car garage
Discussion
On July 9, 2001 the Planning Commission approved a variance to the side yard
setback from another structure Since the approval, the applicants proceeded to get
building permits and had a survey completed on their property to legally find their
property lines The property lines were not were they had originally thought The
proposed attached will be 2 feet from the side yard property line instead of the
required 5 feet V�,u„,�
The staff report of July 9, 2001 stated that a two car garage could be sited where the
existing one car garage is now and recommended denial of the variance
Conditions of Approval
Should the Commission grant approval staff suggests the following conditions of
approval
1 The garage shall be similar architectural style, color and materials as the main
structure
2 Drainage from the roof shall remain on site
3 The existing garage shall be removed
Recommendation
Denial
Findings
•
•
•
1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner,
exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and
neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance
2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same
vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvilege of the
recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors
3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public
interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan
Attachments
Application Form/Letters from the applicants/7/9/01 Staff Report/Site Plan
i
•
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Case No
Date Filed
Fee Paid
Receipt No
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
DEPARTMENT
_Special/Conditional Use Permit
)( Variance
Resubdivision
Subdivision*
Fees
$50/200
$70/200
$100
$100+50/lot
Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
Zoning Amendment* $300
Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $70
Design Review $25
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal 0 e, photos, sketches, etc)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with applications Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the
application process
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 7 Z6 7 141 f o -S'?i--C%-«'e-
Assessor's Parcel No 33 -03-° - 2a -11- -o 013
pp8 (GEO Code)
Zoning District I` Description of Project a 1 c[tt cr Z-carja rave
"1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify 1 will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used "/j
Property Owner NI N tittle? is/It (!0 /iJ avA_ Representative
Mailing Address 7it. J' efJ-7L Mailing Address
5-0.81-- City - State - Zip
Telephone No
Signature
City - State - Zip S%r1-c. (^,q F'( /`l''
Telephone No 6 s' - 35 i - 03 id
Signature /4
Lot Size (dimensions) Ji! x 143
Land Area
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Height of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No of off-street parking spaces
H lmcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
•
•
•
Stillwater 24 August, 2001
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission Review Members
We hereby apply for a second variance to build an attached garage on the north side of
our property located at 726 7th Street South in Stillwater
The first variance has been granted and filed under Case No V/01-30
We need the vanance because after having had a land survey on our property done, we
found out that our property lines where not where we thought they were Building this
garage under this condition would be in violation of Stillwater Ordinance 5b3 —
Development regulations / Exceptions / Side yard Once our proposed attached garage is
built we will 2 (two) feet from the property line on the adjacent lot
We have stated our reasons for having this garage built on our previous vanance
application Please see attached
4/1:--:,
Sincerel
D Maria Poliszuk
7 7t' Street South
Stillwater, MN 550820-5719
(651) 351-0318
•
•
•
Stillwater 20 June, 2001
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission Review Members
We hereby apply for a variance to build an attached garage on the north side of our
property located at 726 7th Street South in Stillwater
We need a vanance because by building this garage we would be in violation of
Stillwater Ordinance 5b3 — Development regulations / Exceptions / Side yard Once our
proposed attached garage is built we will be at least 5 feet from the property line, but only
9 feet from the nearest structure on the adjacent lot
We feel that this is the most appropnate place on our property for this garage to be built
for the following reasons
(1) The house was designed and built with its entrances on the east side (the street side)
and on the north side
(2) Placing the garage on the north side of the property and m back, would take the only
sunny area of the yard, which is wanted for vegetable gardening and simple enjoyment of
the sun
(3) Placing the garage on the north side of the property and in back, would also cause a
good portion of the back yard to be paved for driveway
Sincerely,
Darnel & Mana Poliszuk
726 7th Street South
Stillwater, MN 550820-5719
(651) 351-0318
1
0
0
s.
8
N ~
8�8
m a
SOUTH
8
}tl
- fti �Y
_
I
6 0 8 m NA __
HOLCOMBE
tl b 40 y b 40 40
�►
I Y
� I I
t t }mt m It 148 t 1t }f3
L ,
I I
co
t}Nt},toe }tlt'1it10
I
SOUTH SEVENTH
40 40
b 1 b
Lea $iam alma 2' k
}b
%wa ak=a c a)os a
40 `b `o
SOUTH
A 40
}m
b 1 tl
40 2.
SIXTH
e}Q
tl 1 tl b
8a81 yak }a
S
REET
Y
0
a
8
m
fJ
m
6 0
} a
8
m
ICT, n
dy
G
IE $N 1 co " g'2
t-s•
30 y
8
NmE
30
SOUTH
30
80 C
0
62
f,y m
b A
11
HOLCC
b b
8
t yt
4
F m t-
tl 1 00
7
le
1" n
t� E
I
4
'e N
40
40 40
ti
la
tl b A
20 40 40
3 !
a a 6
oI
tl 40 20
}b
a0 6 6
20 40
}f"
$w
}
m05
a
6
8
s}>1;
8
b_ A
}
ss
a m a fT" a sIr aN el}
—a
I I_
ti 04 .o L
_ bib 40 n—
STREET,
40 b 40 1 b
N 140I.N 1 124.3 I
tl I tl `;
E
4
m a I I
6 0' b I b tl
a m a#N
a 6)w
a
}N
s
a
b
ss
6 0 C b b n n tl tl tl �q as yI n.
n �`. �� `a• I �� � I 1 1
CialYa k' oa le o.NilYomo to V'�p
�t�tl 0
°° 'II
Et w VS I
•
•
r
I8 a' :':
m• a
8
8
8
APE NOT 20000E0
0 0�oE \ 3 °»4
90
n }0 1
8
4
as A�
8
97:1 c/J1 }N
laaj ui also
V
(O
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO V/01-30
Planning Commission Date July 9, 2001 _
Project Location 726 South 7th Street
Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential
Zoning District RB
Applicants Name Daniel and Mana Poliszuk
Type of Application Vanance
Project Description A vanance to the side yard setback for the construction of an attached
garage
Discussion The applicant is requesting a vanance to the zoning requirement of setback distance
to another structure The proposed attached garage would replace an existing detached single car
garage that is scheduled to be demolished
The Zoning Ordinance states that for an attached garage on one side of a dwelling, the garage
setback from the side property line is five feet, provided that no habitable floor area is closer than
ten feet from the property line and provided that the garage is a minunum of 15 feet from the
nearest structure on the adjacent lot The nearest structure on the property adjacent to the
applicant would be 9 feet away
The lot has a number of mature trees and a 5 foot sharp slope going through it These two
circumstances make it difficult to build a two car garage anywhere else A two car garage could
be sited where the existing garage is now The applicant's state in their letter that constructing a
garage where the existing garage is now would result in to much concrete for a dnveway
Installing a driveway would not exceed the maximum lot coverage by ordinance which in this
zoning distnct is 30 percent
Conditions of Approval
1 The addition shall be similar in architecture, color and matenals as the main structure
2 Drainage from the roof shall remain on site
3 The existing garage shall be removed
Recommendation Denial
Findings
1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In
this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring
violations are not hardships justifying a vanance
2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property
rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that
a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvilege of the recipient not enjoyed
by his neighbors
3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent
•
i
e
property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest
nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan
Attachments Application form/letter/site plan/elevation drawing
CPC Action on 7-9-01 +7-0 approval
Ll�ax h,,t,yT,�,11 Alt t �\ 1, ,1\ lt`Iga��6
lVA 1%\4'3r A`�`�tt,i
�,I�l',1,'ll`1TiT`\l
TTT ' n ,
•
,
,
,,l
a, 'z L s. y
•
•
I.I
' '
I i
I ! , 1 I I I I
1
-1
1
I
I
1
-
i ;�ti1� �I1i
( ,ay
1 1;:!
, 1 ; 1 1 ,
- 1 - -- - - -
I �I
/, �
i'I
,
i
'
-�
I
I
1
- I 1
i1
4_
III
1
1
-
I
I
r- ; ;--4-
I , ;
I I f l!, 1 , I
i
(
�-
I
i
I- -
_,,
1
I -
;
,; I �,
-;
I
!,
_1 1
, I
C—
-
--; —
I
--
--
—
-I—
I
1 -
I
1
I - --
-
-
- I
_
'
! I
'
, , 11
I
I-'
r
' S. : 11 -1,' il — —I, r L 1 t _.. _
I'I I r j , , ; �-I
i , -- r , -
,_ 1
1
-1
_1
1
t
__
1
1
L — — (�'—-1
1 —'
I it ' i J
i- —-f-
-
---'-- -
I
I_'
-
I 1-
f
J.
—
i
-1-Li-,
(
i
J
-
1' -_
L
I
I
1-,-
( I.
1 i 1
�' _ I I ' , I I I
I
'
j
. I - - I_ I I_
I
-i-____--�-.�
I , 1
a
1
-
—I
-{- ,-- I l
I
t I
I i
_
I1 — ' —
_I
— --
I
't
- _ I-- '-
4
}---
- ' ' I ` —*— f— I 1 — I ' +' ' -� I F-
[Slope
' I
�7
—�
t -r-' _I
,
'
' '-\ I I I
- t
I
'
—i
,i-
I I 1 I I — f
----`
1 , i_
t
(-1--
1
--f
T—
i ;-
1
I '—
i;----,
t
1
' I
!
�DCo13 F -
I T
T
_ - I -�
1�
,
,
`-�
��y I) 1
j
I
I I
1-
-
-
I
- !
---I
1 ' I _r
►
I I
1
I '
r-I i
,
.1.__ , -L-,
r
- -I---[-
-1—�--
_'
_ _
-'
1
I
'
'
!
L
'
1 1
, I
- 1
I
I i i
l
1 1 t 1
1
1
_
I 4-
I
�'
'
1
I
I I �—}-
I 1
, I
—t
1 i 1
1
,
i ,
,
-�—
r— J— 1
1
I
I
I
I , 1 31
I
,
I
Iliii
I I I
,
1 1 I
1
I
i
I'
I'
i
'
I
I i
1 I
I I I
I
1
-1
I
I
1
0'
1
' ' 1
,
---,-
'
1
I
I !
I I
!
,
I
j
I I
I
I
z
I
I r I'
'
I
I
0 I I I
I I
rt
s
1
f
i
, 1
I
I
I
I
I
F
1
I
I_
11
I
!
I
,IIT
I
I!
`
I
'
i 1
I
f
I
' I
!
11
I I I
,
'
I I 1
I
I
1
I
!
j ,
,
,
!
`
1�
i
I I I'�
4ft;
1 1
l
i l
k 1
----{
1
,
-II
-
1
1
I
1
i 1
!'
I
I
,
I
1
,
I '
1 I� i
1
I
( !
h 1
! j
'
I
43s-
--E-43rN(
,x
I
Ls
I
I,
•
1
'
I
I
Q P. 1
I
I
W
I
, ,
I ! I I
ICI
I I
1� iL'
l
,,,,
!
I�
1
,
I
,LI
I I ,
`4�
;
; ;
IIII
I
►
I I I
___t
, j
f l
11 l I 1 I I I 1 1 1
I
1 1
I
A
I
I
I
` ---- — , — I—
-
-
--I
-
--
—
--
1---1- -
_
— ` ,�
— �—
--
' 1
1 1
Iit
; I I i
-II i
—
•
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO V/01-46
HPC Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 1003 Fifth Street North
Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential
Zoning District RB
Applicant's Name Todd Sharkey
Type of Application Variance
Project Description A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet
requested) for the construction of a wrap -around porch _
Discussion
The applicant is requesting a variance to rebuild a wrap -around porch The intent is to
construct a porch similar to the one that existed at some time in the residence's history
The porch would have wooden columns with a railing around the penmeter Colors
suggested would be either a dark green, or Tight yellow, with white lines It is staffs
suggestion that whatever color chosen be compatible with the main structure
Conditions of Approval
1 The style, colors and materials be compatible with the main structure
2 All revisions to the approved project be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Findings
1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists
In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and
neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance _
2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property nghts possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same
vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the
recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors
•
•
•
3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public
interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan
Attachments
Application Form/Elevation Drawings
•
•
�/�"� 1✓fit /;- /// /
Case No
Date Filed
Fee Paid
Receipt No
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Fees
$50/200
$70/200
$100
$100+50/lot
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_Zoning Amendment* $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $70
_Design Review $25
Special/Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Resubdivision
Subdivision*
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (0 e , photos, sketches, etc )
submitted with appl►cat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with appl:cat►ons Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the
apphcat,on process
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project /00 3 /1/ Assessor's Parcel No al 039 o71 02/ COOL/
n /
Li
Zoning District(GEC) Description of Project d✓{ RAJ c,p�,,/�.y�q� Code)
a"-CC,4
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used "
Property OwnerOwneriel r9,Liks A444e.t./
Mailing Address
City - State - Zip 44 1(wc-,,4ri1 M4/ 2gZ
Telephone No (9la 1- i3'- *pi
Signature
SI
Lot Size (dimensions) _ x
Land Area
Height of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Representative
Mailing Address
City - State - Zip
Telephone No
Signature
ND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No of off-street parking spaces
H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
'5
991)
16b"."....417 16 16 20
Nil)
(0a)
AVENUE
21 22 23
9s.)
I
1312 11
to45)
role
18 10
1
24 25 26 27 28 20 30
pas)
99)
role
0126)
21 22
silo)
8
(04)
23
445)
4 25
1o9 ,
5
rva,
26
roan
A1n
3
28
to41,
H8 1---
CC I
0 1
0 WEST STILLWATER
cog )0 O
30
9*) 6
3r
ST' EET
0
150
4 5 6
10-0)
7 8
99)
3
7•—+8
50 I
9
m4e)
150
1
(043)
4
(ole)
10 1 11
rraaaalr
60 I 50
150
S 21 ro9n
t 1- f
3
8 role)
7
(09 1
8
roan
9
roes
Location Map
w 1 8
tole)
4 8
ea 1
10)
10 I 11 12
(0e) toes) roe)
50 1 50 50
8
60
60
S 3 4 5 1 H
Oi95) 1011) S W
8 W
�`��� Ce
1-
) CO
a76
°o
e°
6
toils)
m
a e5
3 1 8
' ro44)
as
8
to9n
0e z
I 72 1e
I 2
1
8 990) (ale)
g 4 9
--L
"
5
as
1 8
sale)
Weil)
6 7 8
i REF UNE
.----* I S roe+) 3
S )�) °�
7PPAREN OP — —
50 50 50 03 IN
2
0
W
♦—
0
Z
60
arat
150 —
(094)
4
150
12
8
0 1 - T WILKINS
m
150
2100
150
1095) .�
150
WEST ASPEN REE
0
m
50
6
(09 )
150
150
150
roe)
4
150
WEST ELM STREE
150
4
(09)
8
so
19
3_
men
156
(0011)
22
150N
( 9q 9 99.) et')
R_W RIW R2OW
Vicinity Map
0 156
Scale in Feet
rntl w ro a w ctara areasam
wa to ma/ kr 0.
ratans. wry vi won.. Corny rat
napantitte tcr ray armor-0
eo.fa w...oaco.n eo00r Der.
40eee
Para a.basal ,,0400as...a
v. ]e Ail
We Ada aa0 AU
•
•
•
Todd C Sharkey (property owner)
1003 5th Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082 _
651 439 4991
City of Stillwater
Aug 24, 2001
Project Description Rebuild a front, and side wrap -around porch
My goal for this project is to rebuild a wrap -around porch that existed at some time in
the properties past
I have had some contact with a person that used to live in this house some 75 years
ago, and she told me that the house used to have a wrap -around porch attached This
same women told me that she might have some photographs of the way it used to
look, but at this time I haven't received any as of yet
With this project I'm, only looking to restore the property to its original charm that
Stillwater is know for
Colors, At this time the colors that I'm looking to paint it with, are either a dark green,
or light yellow, with white time
Thank you for your consideration
Todd C Sharkey
• • •
12"
4" 1
Ext Treated
Wood Trim
Existing
Grade
i-
7'-6"
El
New Porch Columns
New Porch Rai ing
New Porch Deck
Ledger
Existing Exterior Wall
New Ledger Board
Exist Joist
Treated Wood Support
(anchored to foundation)
I
I
New Typical Porch Foundation
j (to 42" below grade)
I
I
Existing Stone Foundation
PROPOSED PORCH ADDITION
TODD SHARKEY 1
TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH 'PORCH
no scale
• • •
i
J
4 Porch Addition
7-6 II
Exist
Grade
Exist Entry
Door
Stair Railing
Stairs
Typical
Existing
Window
WEST FACING PORCH VIEW PROPOSED PORCH ADDITION
no scale
TODD SHARKEY
•
•
•
I
I
1
I 1 i
i ! I
I
Exist
Grade
New
Window
New
Window
I
I I t
Existing Atrium Door
I
I 1 II
1 ! I
i
I
—i
Existing Deck
L
Sbteeh Pdrdt
•
SOUTH FACING PORCH VIEW
no scale
PROPOSED PORCH ADDITION
TODD SHARKEY
•
Original Garage 4
16 -4
r T-6
I
30-4
r♦
Onginal House
24 -0
♦
c �
i St,Proposed ,_
i EPorch t
t
25-6
-Froposed
6 Poioh
44 -4
40 10+
44-4
!Deck , 3T-0
59 -6
S eewaik�'
52'-0
25 -0
♦
•
48-4
40 10
melee
Street
Y Y
Street £ehtef
J
�SVkaytewalk
i�`yy3�j1_K�f(L,
•
SITE PLAN
no scale
J
1
y
PROPOSED PORCH ADDITION
TODD SHARKEY
1003 N 5th STREET
STILLWATER MN
•
•
•
To Planning Commission
From Steve Russell, Community Development Director
Date September 6, 2001
Subject Annexation, Rezomng and Subdivision of a 2 5 Acre Site located at 8160 Neal Avenue
The site is 8160 Neal Avenue Three streets define the east, north and west boundanes of the lot,
Neal Avenue, Eagle Ridge Trail and Creekside Crossing The site was onginally subdivided with
the intent of further subdivision when City services were available Parcels to the east, west and
north of the stie are in the City
The planning review has three parts, annexation, rezoning and subdivision as discussed separately
below
Annexation
The request is to annex the 2 5 acre parcel into the City of Stillwater The stie is adjacent on three
sides to the City and the property owner is petitioning annexation of the infill lot To date (4) similar
lots along Neal Avenue have been annexed
Rezoning
The site, when it is annexed to the City, comes in with a Agricultural Preservation (AP) designation
The request is to rezone the 2 5 acre site Single Family Residential (RA) similar to Oak Glen and the
newer Creekside Crossing neighborhood to the west
Subdivision
The request is to subdivide the 2 5 acre lot into four new lots The proposed lot sizes are 15,957 sq
ft , 13,852 sq ft , 12 640 sq ft and 14,243 sq ft all above the minimum 10,000 square feet RA lot
standard The existing house meets standard setbacks for the new district designation The proposed
subdivision shows drainage easements along the nght of ways and property lines A sidewalk/trail is
required to connect Neal Avenue and Eagle Ridge Trail to the trail along Creekside Crossing It is
not practical to require a portion of the site to be dedicated for park land, so in lieu, park fees shall be
required Creekside Crossing utility improvements that benefit the site will need to be paid before
final plat signing The City Engineer may have additional comments on the subdivision request
Recommendation
1 Approval of Annexation, ANN/01-02
2 Approval of Rezoning, ZAM/01-04
3 Approval of Subdivision, SUB/01-47 with the following Conditions of Approval
•
•
•
Condition of Approval for SUB/01-47
1 The -annexation shall be approved by the City Council
2 The Zoning Map Amendment and subdivision shall be approved by the Joint Board
3 Park dedication fees shall be paid for the four lot subdivision
4 A trail/sidewalk shall be constructed along Eagle Ridge Trail
5 All comments by the City Engineer regarding utilities, grading/drainage and easements
_ shall be met before final plat recording
Attachments Application and plans
•
•
Mailing Address s I M Cr.k d /1-1-Uf
City - State - Zip SI; ((wc►. ,r vvi `v riSo$Z
Telephone No
/Or
etoz cc/c.e)
Signature
Case No
Date Filed
Fee Paid
Receipt No
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Fees
_Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
Variance $70/200
Resubdivision�`� $100
.nx Subdivision* d°- (l K `�6 � $100+50/lot
omprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_Zoning Amendment* $300
Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $70
Design Review $25
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any apphcat►on All supporting material (0 e , photos, sketches, etc)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with app/►cat►ons Any incomplete app!►cat►on or supporting material will delay the
application process
Address of Project pl
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Assessor's Parcel No /9' 0300 W O O6
(GEO Code)
Zoning District Descnption of Project 3ueA, n. 2 c Iz c
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used " I
Property Owner ZGnrn £ e beCCC1 C Lt ow► c ere Representative Pkvw,C\g.chire.cr kAb ,t 1 Y�C_
Mailing Address (9150 S4-i if , 'I de)
City - State - Zip Ski 1(I,uc& e ,?n vv SSo?
Telephone No (oS 1 - 3(e, a
S►gnatur. i �
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIM
Lot Size (dimensions) — x
Land Area
Height of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
O.N-v.So V,
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No of off-street parking spaces
H \mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
•
•
•
THIS PETITION IS MADE THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST 2001 BY JOHN AND
REBECCA CHOINIERE
1 PROPERTY JOHN AND REBECCA CHOINIERE ARE THE OWNERS OF
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8160 NEAL AVE LEGAL TO GOVERN
(LENGTHY LEGAL) ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THERIN ON FILE AND
OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER AT
WASHINGTON COUNTY -
2 ADJACENCY THAT THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER IS NOW WITHIN
THE TOWN OF STILLWATER AND IS ADJACENT TO AND SHARES A
BORDER WITH THE CITY OF STILLWATER (THE "CITY") ALL IN
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
3 ORDERLY ANNEXATION THAT SECTION 4 09 OF THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER AND THE TOWN OF
STILLWATER FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT, ORDERLY ANNEXATION
AND THE EXERCISE OF JOINT POWERS FOR PLANNING AND LAND
USE CONTROL, DATED AUGUST 16, 1996 (THE "ORDERLY ANNEXATION
AGREEMENT") ALLOWS OWNERS OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE
CITY THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF THEIR PROPERTY TO THE
CITY
4 REQUEST THE OWNER THEREFORE HEREBY PETITIONS THE CITY
FOR ANNEXATION OF HIS PROPERTY TO THE CITY PURSANT TO
SECTION 4 09 OF THE ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
DATED
g
J L CHOINIERE
8-023-0/
/ ci9,42.
REBE(SCA L CHOINIERE
T LLWATER TOWNSHIP �
2`0 00
OF STILLWATE
COURT r.
72 34._
14 0 p 30394
�'. V)C1
W �
15 re us
s. 0 m
Location Map
STILLWATER TWI:
a.
CITY "°°
AL MEADOWS 2ND ADDM0114
EAGLE R 'GE TRAIL
SUNSET
A WALNUT CREEK
RIVE
R_IW 920W R19W
T7.N
T3IN
T3ON
r9N
r28N
rn+
R_W R_IW R_'OW
Vicinity Map
Scale in Feet
Tt.. ,.�..o e. e
e e� ea my
pneses only Wei*. Carry rol
nap. kor amour.
er. am Nama a
noon Ihrdlgll -"200
L O T .1
LOT h
t
L (1 T 1'1
IL
I
uI
LA
Neal Meadows 3rd Addition
Preliminary Plat
L +1 F f l
rue
4
CEPJ9L N8991a 24'E _- p'— —_ ti��1� b8 -M .-- - -/f
C t* 167 b4 i__ �' 15674 % '
___ --- 1 Iwr®
1 I es i
r_
+I
I¢ I I
I I -41
L_
l.-
-1 11 I
' 1 \�� 1 �I III
9�- � 159 24 ' ` 11' a' ••• — �
r
I—
L".
�f1
�< ^hr
( I �T Ig *PM ow I i8
I
I'N C
IINWI (-2 44'
-18 ° i a 11
BL0 1d 3/rf
I3 I 4.4
L� ' �b '� 1 �({ I
/j�47yr7��yj Jw
y041
SY�Y{a a I_I_
-b 1
�e 19: "'11\.an 'nee 9
( SQ919124"W
I�ji
Irr /
lj,
I h
I LI
i
rr
II
11
I I
II
Z
3134,
1 O T r
I r T 8
4-
Site Location
0 IS a0
Jahn & Rebecca gldnl.e
13160 Ned Armee North
sIB.a1. wl, 52062
Pd (051)351 5112
NORTH
120
DEK40PER
Manchester Names. Inc.
6750 Stillwater Bhd
Slants: SIN. 55092
deg Ph. ((6511143Y 2414 Fa (661)439 3254
SMISSMITHES
McComb, Fronk Roos Aesoda s& In.
15050 23rd Annie North
47 PR (763)476-6(110 Fax (763)476-6532
Lel 4 Nock 2 Ned Meadows AND Outlet t; L}eelalde 0060hp,
accord") I the receded plot& Wadd tin Cozad Wnuwt&
RI a
Let 1 . 15257 Sq. FL or 0.37 Ave,
tat 2 . 13.052 Sq. F1. c 032 Aces
lot 3 . 12640 Sq. FL or 0.29 Aces
Lot 4 . 14 243 Sq. FL or 033 Acre,
Total Area . 56.692 Sq. FL or 130 Ara
No Scans
Enghecblp Planning Serrating
caw toi Mr— MomoR le0h S44
,ewv 1e4r 111-611I[-Md
Cider
Manchester Homes Inc
Sollwater MN
Project
Neal Meadows 3rd Addition
Washington Cblmty INN
Shad Tdao
Preliminary Plat
a'e v rurdv mI'btcl �+o>M m e.4 act ej
1 en 1,neral A. mind
.4w Re lam of 1m1 Slat d
'metro
.one
lbt Our P4 1es1e
0aeo.a
Del DP /01
00.4 PIA
Nwa.b
Revlzloao
Nor aah BY Remwee
Sbe et Rawl®
rj/
I
MFRA FILE NO 13414
•
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
To Steve Russell,
Community Development Director
From Shawn Sanders, 4 -c y
Civil Engineer
Date September 6, 2001
Re Neal Meadows 3`d Addition Preliminary Plat review
The Engineering department has reviewed the plat for the Neal Meadows Addition and
have the following comments
1 A sidewalk easement shall be dedicated on the north side of Lots 1 and 2 for
future sidewalk construction
2 All lots shall have an individual connection for City sewer and water
3 A grading and erosion control plan and utility plan shall be submitted to the
Engmeermg department for approval pnor to construction Included in the
plan, shall be innovative drainage system in the easements area to control
storm runoff
4 Trunk charges and Storm Water Annexation Fees set by the Engineering
Department shall be paid at the time of final plat submittal
i
•
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO V/O 1-48
Planning Commission Date September 10, 2001
Project Location 504 West Hickory Street
Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential
Zoning District RB
Applicant's Name Jeff Velin
Type of Application Variance
Project Description A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 13
feet requested) for the construction of a porch
Discussion
The applicant is requesting a variance to the front yard setback for the
construction of a porch The Planning Commission granted a vanance to the
same request on November 8, 1993 with a vote of +7-0 The applicant did not
know a variance expires two years from the date it is issued, so he is reapplying
for the same variance to construct the porch
The proposed setback is 13 feet from the front property line, 30 feet is required
Staff recommended to the Commission in the staff report of November 8, 1993 to
consider approval of the variance The recommendation was based on the site
conditions and setbacks of other residences in the neighborhood, it would not
impact adjacent residents The porch will have a roof with wooden columns
every 8 feet It will be painted the same color as the house
Conditions of Approval
1 The porch shall be similar in style, colors and materials as the main
structure
2 The Building Official shall approve all plans
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned
Findings
1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner,
exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits
and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance
•
•
•
2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of -
substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and
in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special
privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors
3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or
the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan -
Attachments
Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Staff Report and Minutes from 11/8/93
Meeting/Site Plan/Elevation
•
•
•
Case No
Date Filed
Fee Paid
Receipt No
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
_Special/Conditional Use Permit
Vanance
Resubdivision
Subdivision*
Fees
$50/200
$70/200
$100
$100+50/lot
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_Zoning Amendment* $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $70
_Design Review $25
*An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting matenal
submitted in connect►on with any application All supporting material (i e, photos, sketches, etc)
submitted with appl►cahon becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
A site plan is required with appl:cat:ons Any incomplete application or supporting matenal will delay the
application process
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
/
i4 y o2v /� of (/ 02.O0C/�
/00%i
Address of Project � � y �t/ /C /�02 Assessor's Parcel No
(GEO Code)
Zoning District /e.6 Description of Project (%2C/-/ /9j T/64)
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file
permit if it is granted and used "
Property Owner O/ 6 1" SG/Ai Representative _SF
Mailing Address SO i/ a CT/cietw V Mailing Address Sn-"jT
City - State - Zip cT/G /. 1,/476 �� S5-04q City - State - Zip
Telephone No 6 6- 9' % 02 ur Telephone No
Signature
Lot Size (dimensions)%S'x la()
Land Area
Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Height of Buildings Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No of off-street parking spaces
H \mcnamara\sheda\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000
RN
203
020
200
200
2220
(AR
242 e5
(02
2m
more
)010)
1EFEREN(
le(E
dM 8
m2
632
650
me
f 8 WILLIAM 41
me
31
R
8 6
3
3
7
B
14 5
n
545
_
(Cle)
n
04
4 45
0 1 m
3
1,
12
m.e)
4 35
8,
40 40
m44m
40�" 40
3 3 4 5 6 7 8 I
10e5 4 a 1.AZ 1
BAT QI 3
)
50 ...-' m 50 I 50 `• e0 50 j so So 1 60 60 50 60
3 4
53 6 7 8
WEST
50 50
3 12 1 3
3 (AR 3 gift 4 men
3
13
ASPEN STREET
2 6 5 w
m6 w
co
, 2 (am .�,
1 7 8 9 10
I �
9
11 12
ma» 3
WEST
ELM
50
50
2 2
1 3
3 3
4 J
2 e;)12
Ba:5) 1 3
ttan
7
8
9
10
11 12
mda
mdn
mdn
Ba•,
.,, 1 ',3:
mm
_
WEST
56
e0
y6
5
m.,
S
7
8
9
10
11
12
m4h,
m.n
min
m.n
Ba.n
m4k)
3
m
. 60
e0
m
w
...
40 m 40
225
11 110 9e 8
Z I
(0044) a
2-
edn $
6 36 137 38a
225 I'
I
mdn m
40 40 10
Location Map
2
o
man 3
1 !
1939 40
g meta
m I m
^ I
67 I 8
..,5a„ lean
40 40
5 4
man 6.1sn
m
3
mde)
m 42 e5
2
oleo
6An
1 a.
41
40 t m
42
Bann
40 15
3 44 45
alit)
code,
48
mesa
3
25 m I m 4245
m
m
w
50
2
0ee51
3
3
3
20
00
Ram
10
(02
20 60
ET
50
11 12
man
50
3
2'
8
e.n
mdm
�
3 3
main3
�
ON
�
46
14
11
3
10
11
12
7 ,--+ 8
ow 1
md)
Ba!)
mdn
�y
50 50
5050
50
50
HICKORY
2
cc
0
z
60
60
60
STREET
so
2
m.e
50
m.n
3
6
7
4
Balk)
,8
td
3
3
cc
3
2
cm
i
3
60 1 5
4255 42e5 4265 00
8 7 1 6 5
(off , and )
13
m.a
lv
I 2 55
14
m!n
4265
15 16 17 18
m. , (AS) ode,
a es
2e5
2e5 i ae5
1
cm
19 20
mdn m.4)
2e5
2
I ro5
50 I
40 II
m ( 40 m 4285 I 60 xes xes xes 1 xes f20I axes I 2e5
a
ILIW R2OW RI9W
R W ILI W R'UW
Vicinity Map
0 168
Scale in Feet
d im.4iam W 2,.mb M
wow man
arp. Canty oh.
The raw, Nail to wallow Wog.=
Sean waw.eu,Caen, e....p OR.
Panto )aroa
a
urml0.aeV, Foe 30 240
.w Ease Ma20 240
de/42 AL4A)/t/ (/ v c Co /Li m fss/t, A ) ,
•
//v7f /f 5 Q U65T/tJ 4 /, i ci f'o2
74716 �2csAi 7 Y44 J S6- T /34 C /c F'D/e Th`6
Co, 7'r2 (.1cT/0/t) 4IF /4 PeMC/-74 3 0
g e? cli2a i 7 3 f-.7- Ao.a G? 6 .7-6e ,
/'*s U4/e//9-Jlc� 4 s /4, 10,00 ,4 £ ThL
(i 191` /./ /V cV /t)V(/ / rw iJ - 57
•
00/4 /c/or ��vg T/1g 77/AT6
TO C0Al C7/ to Cam-- %'/S /°07 C / tJ/T///.c%
T/IE T/ l'lE Z,// V /TS / 6✓d4
S. NO -I- ,i4111t96
O
(IL
•
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO V/93-57
Planning Commission Meeting November 8, 1993 -
Project Location 504 West Hickory Street
Comprehensive Plan District Residential
Zoning District RB, Duplex Residential
Applicant's Name Jeff Velin
Type of Application Variance
Project Description
The request is to construct a porch addition to an existing residence
Discussion
The request is to construct a porch addition to an existing residence The
proposal is set back 13 feet from the front property -line (30 feet is
required)
Based on the site conditions and the setback of other residences in the
neighborhood, it would not impact adjacent residents
Recommendation
Approval
Findings
Because of site conditions and setbacks of other residences in the area, the
addition could not be relocated on the site without negatively impacting the
character of the residence
Attachment
Application
•
•
•
•
Stillwater Planning Commission
November 8, 1993
There were no comments from the public
Motion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Dorothy Foster to approve the
Variance request Carried 7-0
/
Case No. V/93-57 - A Variance to the sideyard setback requirement
on a corner lot (13 feet requested, 30 feet required) for the
construction of a porch addition The property is located at 504
West Hickory Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District
Jeff Velin, owner, presented the request
There were no comments from the public
Motion by Glenna Bealka, seconded by Duane Elliott to approve the
variance request Carried 7-0
Case No._ V/93-58 - A Variance to the sign Ordinance for placement
of a 33 square foot free-standing multi -tenant sign The property
is located at 1675 South Greeley Street in the RA, Single Family
Residential District
Andy Hansen, representative of Attracta Sign Co , and Jennifer
Lee, property manager, presented the request They stated that
the location of the existing sign creates some confusion There
will not be much excess lighting from the sign because it is a
dark background with white lettering The light will shut off at
midnight Neighbors on both sides approve of the plan
Motion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Dorothy Foster to approve the
Variance request as conditioned Carried 7-0
Case No. SUP/93-59 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a small
computer consulting and design business out of a residential
structure The property is located at 231 North Everett Street
in the RB, Two Family Residential District
Charles and Amy Buchwald presented the application There will
be no additional traffic caused by the business, and no signage
Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Kirk Roetman to approve the
Special Use Permit as conditioned Carried 7-0
Case No. BM/93-61 - The applicant has withdrawn the request
OTHER BUSINESS
Review Shoreland Ordinance -
Ann Pung-Terwedo reported that the City Council felt the
Shoreland Ordinance was too restrictive as it was presented The
section regarding trimming of vegetation was broadened
Motion by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Glenna Bealka to approve the
• • •
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
BARRETT M STACK
STILLWATER, MINN 55082
MINNESOTA REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR
Tel No 439-5630
JOI3 NOI None
SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR, David and Sue Broberg, 16348 So 7th Street Court,
Lakeland, Minnesota 55043
1)FSCRIPTIONI Proposed Utility Easement Description
An Easement for underground utility purposes over, under and across all that part of the
South Half of Lot 11, Block 12, Staples and May's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County,
Minnesota, as amended by Myron Shepards Perfected Plat of the City of Stillwater dated
May 21, 1878, said easement being 15 00 feet in width and 7 50 feet on either side of the '
following described centerline
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Block 12, thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 44
seconds West, assumed bearing, along the southerly line of said Block 12, a distance of
89 26 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline of the 15 00 foot wide easement
being described, thence northerly and northeasterly 43 50 feet along said centerline on a
non -tangential curve concave to the East, having a radius of 73 38 feet, a central angle of
33 degrees 57 minutes 45 seconds, the chord of said curve bears North 14 degrees 29 minutes
58 seconds East, thence North 31 degrees 28 minutes 51 seconds East along tangent and along
said centerline 39 88 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of said South Half of Lot 1 1 ,
and the end of the easement being described The side lines of said easement are prolonged
or shortened to terminate on the outside boundary of said South Half of Lot 11, Block 12,
Staples and May's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota
NOTES The above description is intended to be used to define the easement referred to in
Book 314 of Deeds, Page 832
The above description is based the location of the underground water service to the
to the existing structure located at 810 North Everett St The location of this
water service was marked on the ground by others utilizing electronic location
equipment It is assumed the sewer service to 810 North Everett was constructed
in essentially the same location as the water service The firm that installed
the utilities, C & P Excavating, is no longer in business and the exact
relationship of the water line to the sewer line is not known
Orientation of this bearing system is assumed
No boundary survey conducted as of April 19, 1989
No improvements located other than as shown
Q44. le
\ a
, NORTH / `"PP Rom', GO'
•
n r
0\
0�
0
- - N88oSG ¢2E
.4/r�l /'5
1ti
/OD OO -- -
•
41 39 =
0A
CE,vsEct-�Ns
a rvices is
Ocsc
EsMr
/A
1 �6
A
0
i
r a
17'o '7CoI
,
Satiny
Cow ♦ Sipe wenic
O�_ ,r2r t.'..ea ,
5- LorS //6/2
„/ Exij7#a/&
Z STDee Y
Ale mf /,�DvsE
/ii.e
CA*
7
Imvic,orDs
uvr-r27a
B<o0 //AL F
WALL im's
err,)
Al
8926
- 588°56'44"Ld
MD Oa
i
4ST
♦
ti
SE ar
.a /e
-= 20
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or rclur was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of'
the State of Minnesota
Date APrAl 19, 1989 Reg No 13774
•
0
71,
4.1
1
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
To Planning Commission
From Sue Fitzgerald, Planner
Date September 10, 2001
Subject Fence Ordinance Revisions
- Staffwas directed by the Commission at the August 13, 2001 meeting to change some of
the text in the current fence ordinance that have caused some issues m administering the
ordinance
Amendments to Zoning Ordinance 31-74 sub M (4e 5m)
1 m-5a - All fence posts and supporting members shall be placed witlun the
property lines of the property on which the fence is located
2 m-5a - On corner lots, no fence shall be permitted within the intersection sight
distance tnangle
0
•
•
1181-1
STELLWATER CODE
c Front yard 50 feet when not within
a PUD
d Rear yard 25 feet when not within a
PUD
e Building and impervious surfaces
60 percent when not within a PUD
f Landscaping and open space 40 per-
cent when not within a PUD
g Additional setback regmrements
When a property within this district
is directly across a street or thorough-
fare or adjacent to any residential
district, all parking and loading fa-
cilities must be at least 20 feet from
the property line and buildings and
structures at least 20 feet from the
street The setback space must be
permanently landscaped
h Other requirements All uses shall
be conducted wholly within com-
pletely enclosed buildings, except for
service stations, parking facilities and
other outdoor uses when appropri-
ately located and designed as ap-
proved by the planmng commission
(4) Design permit A design review permit is
required for all village commercial uses
The country village architectural and de-
sign guidelines, set forth in Exhibit E to
the Orderly Annexation Agreement be-
tween the City and Town of Stillwater,
dated August 16, 1996, are the standards
that must be applied to this design re-
view
(5) Planned unit development These develop-
ment requirements may be modified based
on an acceptable planned unit develop-
ment for the entire village commercial
distract area
(Ord No 830, 9-3-96)
Sobd 24 , :le r-egula ons�.Supple-
inen : regulations govdnurig thus section areas
RiA s
Exceptions, additions or modifications The pro-
visions of this subdivision are subject to the
exceptions, additions or modifications as set
forth in the following
(1) Essential services Essential services, as
defined in this subdivision, are permitted
in all distracts
(2) Soil stripping No person may stnp, exca-
vate or otherwise remove topsoil for sale,
or for use other than on the premises from
which it is taken, except in connection
with the construction or alteration of a
building on the premises and any inciden-
tal excavation or grading
(3) Vacant lots of record Notwithstanding
the limitations imposed by any other pro-
visions of this subdivision, the city council
may permit erection of a dwelling on any
lot (except a lot in an industrial district),
separately owned or under contract of
sale and containing, on May 1, 1974, an
area or width smaller than that required
for a one -family dwelling, provided that
munici • : - : • wer an • : - ervice 1s avail-
CD31 56
to the
e
Clear •rners On a corner lot m
residential distract no fence, wall, hed
or other structure or planting more than
three feet in height may be erected, placed
or maintained within the triangular area
formed by the intersecting street lines
and a straight line adjouung the stree
hues at points which are 40 feet dis
from the point of intersection, pro
that this regulation does not ap
s trimmed to a height of
above street grade leve
t
: 1
Y
vi
ed
Y to
feet
Substandard lots No lot, yard, court or
other open space, already containing less
area than the minimum required under
this subdivision, may be further divided
or reduced
(6 :„Bedand break ]`asi=The.city council recog-
nizes t at bed and_breakfasts are an aBset
(5)
V
•
•
•
1. E\ceotions to Height Re u1at,ons
1 Roof Structures The maximum height specified in Paragraph One may be
exceeded by church spires, belfnes, cupolas, chimneys, ventilators,
skylights, water tanks, bulkheads and similar features and by necessary
mechanical appurtenances usually cames above the roof level, provided
such structure is an integral part of a building
2 Maximum Height of Accessory Buildings in Residential Districts In
residential districts an accessory building shall not exceed 20 feet in height
or the distance from the accessory building to a main building or potential
location of a main building on adjoining premises in a residential district
whichever is less
1 Land Reclamation Regulations
- a "Land Reclamation" is the reclaiming of land by depositing or moving_
material to elevate the grade The term "Land Reclamation" shall not
include landscaping done by or under the direction of a property owner
that does not affect the drainage pattern or alter or intensify the flog into
or upon public or private property When applicable land reclamation
shall be done in accordance with the Flood Plain Ordinance, Grading_
Ordinance and City Code Section 31 04 regarding Itietlands
b Land reclamation shall be permitted only by special use permit The
permit shall include as a condition thereof, a finished grade plan which
will not adversely affect the adjacent land and as a condition thereof, shall
regulate the type of matenal permitted, program for rodent control, plan
for fire control and general maintenance of the site, controls of vehicular
ingress and egress and for control of matenal dispersed from runoff, wind
or hauling of material to or from the site
m Fence Regulations
1 Purpose The purpose of this section is to provide for the regulation of
fences in the City, to prevent fences being erected that would be a hazard
to the public, or an unreasonable interference with the uses and enjoyment
of neighboring property and are compatible with existing uses and other
zoning restnctions
l
2 Definitions For the purpose of this ordinance, the following definitions
shall apply
Chapter 31- 74
•
a Fences shall be any lineal structure used to prevent access by
persons or animals or prevent visual or sound transference
3 Permit required No fence shall be erected without first obtaining a fence
permit Application shall be made to the Community Development
Director along with a fence permit fee m the amount of $25 The
Community Development Director is authorized to issue a fence permit if
the application indicates that the fence will be in compliance with this
chapter The council shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged that
the Community Development Director was in error The appeals shall be
taken as prescribed in Chapter 31, Administration
4 Fences may be permitted in all yards, subject to the following
a Fences in excess of six (6) feet above the ground grade shall be
prohibited unless the abutting neighbor consents to a higher fence
and permission is granted by the Council
b The side of the fence considered to be the face (finished side as
opposed to structural supports) shall face abutting property
c No fence shall be permitted on public right of ways
d No fence shall be erected on corner lot that will obstruct or impede
the clear view of an inter -section by approaching traffic
e In residential districts, fences located in the front yard beyond the
building line shall not exceed 42 inches in height
5 Fences may be permitted along property lines subject to the following
`l a Fences that require continuing maintenance such as wooden
privacy fences shall not be erected within one foot of a property
line
b Fences in commercial or industnal districts may be erected on the
lot line to the height of six feet, to a height of eight feet with a
security arm for barbed wire
6 No existing fence in violation of this section will be allowed to be replaced
or rebuilt Should an existing fence be replaced or rebuilt, it must come
under the regulations of this section
Chapter 31- 75
7 No fence shall be erected where it will impede a drainage way- or drainage
easement
8 Violations of this ordinance may be enforced by injunction and the city
shall be entitled to the remedy of abatement in order that a fence erected in
violation of this section may be removed
- n Swimming Pool Locations All swimming pools or appurtenances thereto shall
be located in the rear yard at a distance of at least ten (10) feet from any property
line (see City Code, Construction of Swimming Pools, 33 02 for additional
requirements) - �� T,,
o Purpose To ensure that any grading conducted for the purposes of building
construction is done according to the grading plan for a subditi ision as approti ea
by the Stillwater City Council To avoid drainage problems which may occur as a
result of building development
- Every proposed new building requires a grading plan to be submitted with the
building permit plans The following items are required to be shown on the
grading plan
1 The location of the building, driveway, tree cover, wetlands, drainage
ways or ditches, city streets, neighbonng structures, and other significar,
features
2 The e'isting elevation of the building pad, neighboring structures, top of
curb at the driveway, wetlands elevation, all lot comers and any drainage
structures
3 The proposed elevation of the first floor, lowest floor, garage floor, walk-
out (if any), high or low points (breaks in grade)
4 Drainage arrows showing the route of run off across the lot with proposed
elevations of drainage swales
5 if the lot is adjoining a wetlands, the plan should show how erosion will
be controlled Normally a silt fence or other erosion control method will
be required along the flow path to the wetland
6 Any retaining walls, steep slopes, or other special grading features should
be denoted
A cash escrow in an amount established by resolution shall be paid before
Chapter 31 - 76
Engineering • Planning • Surveying
1 .
1 1 1
�. ♦i
L
•
•
s
L1J
1
1. .
r
•/
I•
r♦
•.
-
I •
-1-
1 1 1
♦ / 1
•
A .•
1 t.
i
18" RC;p .
0
Neal Meadows 3rd Addition
•
—ide
ONO OOP
OM — —
/ •
0.
•
EMT, Iv/vs
I.L.=884.67
tNv=878.23
t
CURBISTOP
Preliminary Plat
r A iN I r
1- - J 1 -1 1 1- -
L4 %.i L..
gi:24"E
1s7.4
xiS
kl6
— t-
159.24
4
L. 887.4O
V=878.38
,f
-� )A6_,74
S89'19,,24 W
1cb
c1. /•
V �f
J-
`r
---887-
`x' V (TYPICAL) �6,89
7 -.- PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY ES vTT. - -'1 c ' 12
co / 00
r‘ /' r-
1-f 1 11--
I ♦ 1 L./ 4I
---887-w-- -- �-.._.
-1- r 'ti A I I
1 II-f /. 1 1
--L ! ♦ 1 ♦ I L -.
319409-- — 888
88..M 156.74 ,\
I�
PP
887
----
,,r
I O,CLIAN OUT
r JV .00LEAw
--a 1— - / f` ram- —
‘) - it
,/
O 1N.
1
13-1,61<itictED
7♦
♦
♦ •
vI SEI
N.
A
- O I,4®WELL
♦
I•
1
co
313.49
GAS MTR.�
CV
-T
DRI'WAY
`50.6
Op
00
12
O
N
0
z
cc
O
M
d
3
of
U
w
L.
O
N
w
v)
Li
O
w
z
J
N
w
•
•
•
•
•
NORTH
0 15 30 60
OWNER
John 8c Rebecca Choiniere
8160 Neal Avenue North
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
Ph. (651)351-5112
DEVELOPER
Manchester Homes, Inc.
6750 Stillwater Blvd.
Stillwater, MN. 55082
Greg Johnson
Ph. (651)439-2414 Fax (651)439-3254
Site Location
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North_
Ph. (763)476-6010 Fax (763)476-8532
120
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lot 8, Block 2, Neal Meadows AND Outlot C, Creekside Crossing,
according to the recorded plats, Washington County, Minnesota.
AREAS
Lot 1 = 15,957 Sq. Ft. or 0.37 Acres
Lot 2 = 13,852 Sq. Ft. or 0.32 Acres
Lot 3 = 12,640 Sq. Ft. or 0.29 Acres
Lot 4 = 14,243 Sq. Ft. or 0.33 Acres
Total Area = 56,692 Sq. Ft. or 1.30 Acres
No Scale
PARIA
McCombs Frank Roos
Associates, Inc.
Client
Manchester Homes Inc.
Stillwater, MN.
Project
Neal Meadows 3rd Addition
Washington County, MN.
Sheet Title
Preliminary Plat
I hereby certify thot this plan was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Signature
Name
Date License No.-10938
Designed
Checked PAJ
Drawn FHZ Approved
Date 8/24/01
Revisions
No. Date By Remarks
Sheet
Revision