Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-11-13 CPC Packet4 • 11 Ater. • THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, November 13, 2000, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of October 9, 2000 AGENDA 1 Case No SUB/00-69 A modification to the subdivision regulations for shape of lot for Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 4, Hersey, Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater (1330 3rd Ave So) into two lots, Lot 1 containing 7,566 square feet and Lot 2 containing 12,614 square feet in the RB, Two Family Residential Distract Thomas S Peulen, applicant (Continued from October 8, 2000 meeting) 2 Case No V/00-76 A vanance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 8 feet requested) for an existing residence at 1330 3rd Avenue South in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Thomas Peulen, applicant 3 Case No V/00-74 A vanance to the side yard setback (30 feet required, 18 feet requested) for the construction of a 12 x 12 screen house at 107 Lakeside Dnve in the RB, Two Family Residential District Colleen Weiss, applicant 4 Case No V/00-75 A vanance to the parking lot setback requirements for construction of parking lot with 10 foot setback from front property line (20 feet required) at 1709 Greeley Street in the BP -I, Business Park Industrial Distnct John Diana, applicant 5 Case No SUP/00-77 A special use permit for a Type II Home Occupation Permit for a massage therapy business out a residence located at 2160 Oak Glen Trail in the RA, Single Fammly Residential Distnct Mary Schulte, applicant 6 Case No SUP/00-79 A special use permit to replace an existing sign with an internally illuminated sign at 1616 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Pastor Steven Molin, Our Saviors Lutheran Church, applicant 7 Case No V/00-80 A vanance to the Zomng Ordinance height requirements to place two radio antennas on top of the Washington County Government Center at 14949 62nd Street North in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Berme Morency representing Washington County Government Center, applicant 8 Case No SUP/00-81 A special use permit use determination for 1655 Market Dnve to conduct a light industnal with retail sales use in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial Kelhson Company, applicants . Other items -Consideration of pnonty trail improvements CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 • • City Of Stillwater Planning Commission October 9, 2000 Present John Rhemberger, Robert Gag, Russell Hultman, Glenna Bealka, David Middleton, Gerald Fontaine — Commission Chair and Terry Zoller, City Council Representative Absent Darwin Wald and Karl Ranum Others present Steve Russell Community Development Director as staff assistant Mr Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m Approval of minutes , John Rhemberger, seconded by Glenna Bealka, moved approval of the September 11, 2000, minutes as presented, motion passed unanimously Case No ZAM/00-07 A Zoning Map Amendment rezoning 10+ acres south of Wildpines Lane between County Road 5 and Parkwood Lane from (AP) Agricultural Preservation to Townhouse Residential(TR) City of Stillwater applicant Steve Russell explained that this amendment request stemmed from an earlier request (SUB/00- 61) to subdivide a 2 2 acre lot into two 1 1 acre lots This case was continued from the 9/11/00 Planning Commission meeting Mr Russell also noted that the church along Wildpines Ln is incorrectly designated large lot single family so the commission might want to take that out of the recommendation if you recommend re -zoning it The Comp plan indicates that the area is designated townhouse and that was the reason for continuing SUB/00-61 The 2 2 acre lot in question had been in the AP Agricultural Preservation distnct, therefore the Zoning amendment request Comments Vern Hill 2800 Wildpines Lane- adjacent to the property in question, expressed concern for the property values in the area and future assessed costs for all of the expansion Steve Russell explained the process for zomng amendments and rezoning requests In this and other cases, the Planning Commission investigates the changes and makes recommendations to the City Council Mr Hill asked if there was a difference between the Townhome and Attached Single Family designations The are basically the same — 6 dwelling units per acre Mr Hill asked about access to these units — which are currently Parkwood Ln and County Rd 5 Cty Rd 5 will probably not continue to be a direct access road — there is a road off of Curve Crest that is a part of the Long Lk Villas that would provide access to the south end of this site Mr Hill asked about who would pay for any improvements needed to existing roads Mr Russell stated that this would be done according to our existing assessment policy Vern Hill asked for this to be continued and thought out more Jerry Fontaine stated that this has been looked at for 7 years and that the issue is not townhomes but re -zoning and that the commission had come to the conclusion that townhomes are best suited to this area and that it obviously fits with the comprehensive plan Terry Zoller explained further that this rezoning came about because of a homeowners request (case #2) to subdivide his property and that instead of doing this one area at a time, the commission decided to rezone this • • City Of Stillwater Planning Commission October 9, 2000 entire area This also protects the area from commercial development Art Junker asked if residents would be sent notice when developers come in He was told that residents would definitely be told John Rhemberger moved to approve, seconded by Robert Gag, motion passed unanimously Case No SUB/00-61 A request to subdivide a 2 2 acre lot into two equal lots of 1 1 acres at 1167 Parkwood Lane in the AP,Agncultural Preservation Distnct (continued from 9/11/00 Planning Comm Meeting and part of Case No ZAM/00-07 Applicant Mr Gary A Ritzer, applicant was present Mr Ritzer stated that a surveyor was presently working on this No one commented on this request Glenna Bealka moved to approve, second by John Rheinberger, motion passes 7 — 0 This will also be heard in November at the Council Meeting Case No V/00-67 A vanance to the side yard setback (5 feet required — 3 feet being requested) Vanance requested for the construction of an 8 foot addition to an existing attached garage at 1121 S Everett St in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Thomas J Schirber, applicant was present Mr Fontaine stated that the conditions of approval must be met These are that the garage shall be similar in style, color and material as the main structure, that drainage from the roof shall remain on site and that the plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official Mr Schirber stated that his neighbor had no problem with his plans and adding a 2nd stall to his garage would not stand out nor be a significant detnment to the neighborhood and it does not adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan No comments from the public Motion to approve made by Dave Middleton, seconded by Rob Gag All in favor Resident must wait 10 days before starting the project Case No V/00-68 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 13 feet requested) for the addition of a front porch at 709 West Myrtle St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Dennis and Mary Asp, applicants were present Mr Fontaine pointed out the two conditions of approval — that the style, color and matenals shall be the same as the main structure and that the plans are to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official Ms Asp stated that this request is being made to improve the appearance of their property Two large trees in the front of the house had died and been taken out, leaving the house looking like a box Mr Fontaine asked if the porch was going to be serviceable in terms of being screened in The owner stated that it was to be left open —just a floor, posts and the roof Discussion on property lines and the existing structure bemg out of vanance occurred No comments from the public Although staff recommended denial of this request, Mr Rheinberger recommend that this be approved for safety reasons He was somewhat • • City Of Stillwater Planning Commission October 9, 2000 familiar with the house and agreed that because this faced to the north and ice build up in the winter would be a problem, that some type of porch structure would be needed John Rhemberger moved for approval, seconded by Glenna Bealka Terry Zoller commented that the plan fits in with the community style and that it made more sense to allow a 6 foot porch than a 4 foot porch All in favor Case No SUB/00-69 A modification to the subdivision regulations for the shape of lots 7, 8 and 9, block 4, Hersey, Staples and Company's Addition to Stillwater (1330 3rd Ave S) into two lots Lot 1 containing 7,566 square feet and Lot 2 containing 12,614 sq ft in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Thomas S Peulen, applicant was present The applicant presented two options for the division of the property Option "A" features a straight line separating the two lots but would not allow for the 10 foot required setback Option "B" would feature an irregular property line but would allow for the 10 foot existing residence setback Mr Peulen stated that he would go with either option Mr Fontaine questioned the need for the 10 foot setback standard He was informed that it was for accessibility reasons Mr Russell recommended that the resident go with Option `B" because it would not require a variance request No comments from the audience Terry Zoller moved to continue, John Rheinberger seconded No discussion All in favor Case No V/00-70 A vanance to the accessory use regulations for construction of a 576 sq ft second two -car detached garage at 631 Hidden Valley Court in the RA, single Family Residential Distnct Peter and Jackie Brochman, applicants were present Mr Fontaine read three conditions of approval, that the roofline is the same angle as the existing house, that the building shall be similar in style, color and matenals as the main structure and that all changes to the approved plan be reviewed and approved by the Community Development director The resident that the garage would not be for everyday use, it would be used to store and restore some collector vehicles that he owned The resident produced some signatures of neighbors stating that they had no problem with this request Ms Brochman stated that in tounng the neighborhood, there were 6 second accessory buildings that exceeded the 120 sq ft maximum so this would not vary much from the surrounding properties No other comments came from the public Mr Russell stated that "if the building official made a mistake in issuing a previous permit, that that was not justification for zoning approval" According to guidelines, only 1 outbuilding of a maximum 10 x 12 ft size is allowed Russell Hultman moved for denial, seconded by Terry Zoller Motion denied by a vote of 7 to 0 Mr Rheinberger stated that he "felt" for these people, especially considenng that neighbors had benefited from previous errors, but that it may be time to "cut the city's losses" Other solutions are open to these residents, a three car garage or doubling back on the present garage • • City Of Stillwater Planning Commission October 9, 2000 Case No SUB/00-71 A subdivision to combine lots 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9, block 2, Kern-Pauley Addition for the construction of a new chmc located at 1701 Curve Crest Blvd in the BP-O, business Park office District Robert Nuffort, St Croix Orthopaedics, applicant was present, along with Andrew Jordan Terry Zoller commented that the city is under a lot of pressure regarding sidewalks on that street and that perhaps a sidewalk could be considered Mr Zoller requested an additional condition requinng a 6 foot set -back for signs, etc be included for a total of 20 John Rheinberger moved for approval of this subdivision as conditioned Motion seconded by Russell Hultman This will go to City Council in November Case No V/00-72 A vanance to the Slope Setback Regulations for the construction of a retaining wall and two -car garage that is located within the required 30 foot setback from a 25 percent or greater slope at 1307 North Broadway Street in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Kerry Townsend, applicant, was unable to attend Alan Kretman with MGI Engineenng firm represented the applicant The two conditions of approval are that the garage shall be similar in style, matenals and colors as the existing structure and that all plans, including the be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official Mr Kretman wanted to clanfy that the wall would stay on the owners property and that soil bonngs have been done by Braun Engineenng He also requested that they be allowed to dig down to bedrock and put the retaining wall on the bedrock and then build up above the grade allowing for a solid, stable structure There is already a lot of erosion on the NE corner of the property When the wall is being constructed, it will be necessary to remove the existing garage and the owners would like to replace it with a two -car, attached 26'by 24' garage that would be approximately 10 feet from the top of the retaining wall Mr Kretman pointed out that this would be in keeping with the neighborhood setbacks and be safer for the occupants Tim Casey of 1220 N Broadway asked what exactly is slope setback Mr Russell explained the slope setback requirements and the need for them Dory Chnstoffersen expressed concerns about the drainage from the retaining wall Mr Kretman explained the current and future drainage patterns Mr Fontaine explained that this application would be divided into two parts John Rheinberger moved for approval of the retaining wall, Russell Hultman seconded No discussion All in favor John Rheinberger moved for approval of the garage plans, seconded by Dave Middleton All in favor Case No SUP/00-73 A special use permit for a co -location 100 foot monopole telecommunications tower located at 1700 Washington Avenue in the BP -I, Business Park Industnal Distnct Steve Katkov, APT Minneapolis, Inc , applicant Peter Coyle was present to represent the applicant • 1 City Of Stillwater Planning Commission October 9, 2000 Conditions of approval are that the landscape plant and building and pale colors shall be reviewed by the Business Park Design Review Committee and that all tower conditions and construction requirements contained in the City zomng Ordinance, Section 31-4 shall be met Mr Coyle pointed out that the plan meets all of the city's stnngent requirements Don Rice, owner of the Stillwater Vetennary Clinic questioned what height restnctions were in town regarding buildings and/or towers Mr Russell explained these to him and that towers are different restnctions are different from building restrictions John Rheinberger moved for approval, seconded by Robert Gag No further discussion All in favor Other items Mr Russell reminded commission members of the October 16 joint board meeting/public heanng on the City Trail Plan Mr Fontaine called for a motion to adjourn at 9 30 p m Motion made by John Rhemberger, seconded by Russell Hultman, all in favor Respectfully submitted, Kathy Rogness Recording Secretary y. • MEMO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Vanance to the Side Yard Setback (8 feet proposed, 1 feet required) for a Lot Subdivision (Case No V//00-76) Date November 9, 2000 The first two cases on the Planning Commission agenda relate to each other At the October 9, 2000 meeting, the Commission reviewed the subdivision request (SUB/00-69) and preferred the alternative that requires the variance The variance (V/00-76) was not advertised or heard at the October 9, 2000 meeting At this meeting, both the vanance and the subdivision can be considered The City Council at their November 7, 2000 meeting in anticipation of your action approved Option "A" subdivision subject to Planning Commission approval of the vanance Recommendation Decision on vanance request (8 feet rather the 10 feet side yard setback) and subdivision (subdivision of 20,064 square foot lot into two lots of 12,614 and 7,566 square feet) Finding The proposed vanance and subdivision is consistent with zoning requirements and the intent of the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application and minutes and staff report SUB/00-69 • • MEMO To Mayor and City Council From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Request to Subdivide 20,064 Square Foot Lot into Two Lots of 12,614 and 7,566 Square Feet at 1330 3rd Avenue South Case No SUB/00-69 Date November 2, 2000 This item will be heard by the Planning Commission on November 13, 2000 A variance is required for this approval to the setback requirements for an existing residence (see staff report) Recommendation Approval of Option "A" subdivision subject to Planning Commission approval on November 13, 2000 for V/00-76 Attachments Application and staff report City Council Action on 11/7/00 +4-0 approval subject to Planning Commission approval of variance Case No V/00-76 • • I • City Of Stillwater Planning Commission October 9, 2000 familiar with the house and agreed that because this faced to the north and ice build up m the winter would be a problem, that some type of porch structure would be needed John Rhemberger moved for approval, seconded by Glenna Bealka Terry Zoller commented that the plan fits in with the community style and that it made more sense to allow a 6 foot porch than a 4 foot porch All in favor Case No SUB/00-69 A modification to the subdivision regulations for the shape of lots 7, 8 and 9, block 4, Hersey, Staples and Company's Addition to Stillwater (1330 3rd Ave S) into two lots Lot 1 containing 7,566 square feet and Lot 2 containing 12,614 sq ft m the RB, Two Family Residential Distract Thomas S Peulen, apphcant was present 1 The applicant presented two options for the division of the property Option "A" features a straight line separating the two lots but would not allow for the 10 foot required setback Option "B" would feature an irregular property line but would allow for the 10 foot existing residence setback Mr Peulen stated that he would go with either option Mr Fontaine questioned the need for the 10 foot setback standard He was informed that it was for accessibility reasons Mr Russell recommended that the resident go with Option `B" because it would not require a variance request No comments from the audience Terry Zoller moved to continue, John Rheinberger seconded No discussion All in favor Case No V/00-70 A variance to the accessory use regulations for construction of a 576 sq ft second two -car detached garage at 631 Hidden Valley Court in the RA, single Family Residential District Peter and Jackie Brochman, applicants were present Mr Fontaine read three conditions of approval, that the roofline is the same angle as the existing house, that the building shall be similar in style, color and matenals as the main structure and that all changes to the approved plan be reviewed and approved by the Community Development director The resident that the garage would not be for everyday use, it would be used to store and restore some collector vehicles that he owned The resident produced some signatures of neighbors stating that they had no problem with this request Ms Brochman stated that in tounng the neighborhood, there were 6 second accessory buildmgs that exceeded the 120 sq ft maximum so this would not vary much from the surrounding properties No other comments came from the public Mr Russell stated that "if the building official made a mistake m issumg a previous permit, that that was not justification for zoning approval" Accordmg to guidelines, only 1 outbuilding of a maximum 10 x 12 ft size is allowed Russell Hultman moved for denial, seconded by Terry Zoller Motion denied by a vote of 7 to 0 Mr Rhemberger stated that he "felt" for these people, especially considering that neighbors had benefited from previous errors, but that it may be time to "cut the city's losses" Other solutions are open to these residents, a three car garage or doubling back on the present garage 3 • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/00-69 Planning Commission Date October 9, 2000 Project Location 1330 3rd Avenue South Comprehensive Plan District Two Fanuly Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Thomas Peulen Type of Application Subdivision Project Description Request to subdivide an existing lot of 20,064 square foot lot into two lots of 12,614 and 7,566 square feet Discussion The request is to subdivide a 20,064 square foot lot into two lots of 12,635 or 12,614 square feet and 7,545 or 7,566 square feet The applicant is providing two subdivision options to chose from Option "A" shows a straight property line separating the two lots In Option "A", the existing residence is setback 8 feet from the property line, 10 feet is required Option "B" has an irregular property line but allows for the 10 foot existing residence setback Both options meet the lot dimensions and size requirements If Option "A" is selected a variance for the existing residence is required Recommendation Option `B" (requinng no vanance) Attachments Application and plans CPC Action on 10/9/00 Continued to November 13, 2000 CPC Meeting 4un 5 8 con 8 7 9 132 8 T LOUIS m m A r 43 ioo 3 1 5 A w 27 28 2.. 30 0 Ow Location Map CT 80 8 1 5 to fH 14)) 8 R♦f �� 8 1444 n )7fXI) h m 6 11 R 8 e RI 9 8 10 wmn 8 132 132 AIM 111MMIIIIIMIMMIal 8 132 11 n 132 4c0,) 8 a+ 17 8 ym)) re )) >� 8 115p) �1 >/ d 8 14 8 it 18 8 1 8 h 1e r,i 10 It — RI ,32 12 ,4 6 z;i1 12 11 I041� 8 75 par) A 1. ti 10 4Po) 13/ VACATED PBK 169 DEE 132 3 woo) STREET rnvcFSTILLWATFR <s. GTIOFOAK PARK I•€JOifS 8 1� 10 2Z.* 30 40 120 40 Z no 40 40 120 19 0 1; 7 18 15 14 1 1 9 8— too Ag 4m4 O O , IIIMIlloo3 � A AIIIDTU 40 r 11411W R20W R199. na R22w R2IW RAW Marty Map 0 155 Scale In Feet 4baabpbhnWd mrplmr re �dbrd mewlstwo mm b aa.9a. W a1Y V m Qvbdea 7r. baby .oN too told b rd..o bgYm brat Awn Im1)m69/ Nod 66 bawd ow AS= rtarmr a..,nmd. MinZm wvWd sg.rb.22 bmb • • Case No 50a ('D -6 Date Filed ®dO Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Fees _Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 Variance $70/200 XResubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $1 00+50/lot _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance Design Review $300 $500 $70 $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with apphcation becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 3 30 SRO AVE SD, Assessor's Parcel No ..7z/G.5cc [-2 _,; j 000 7 QQ (GEO Code) Zoning District U Description of Protect SUROIaD 'f 1D Lo i 2 ,r or- LOT (Pe-12.,L "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence subm►ffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " G S S PetAite0 Property Owner Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No S I — ((3,bj Signature Gw° Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions)S1 / x / 1 )— Land Area 7 5-6 b S . (//: Height of Buildings Storrgs Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION Notes "M " Ind measured value "R " Ind record value o Ind /13774 iron pipe set • Ind mon found as noted Offsets shown to existing structures are measured to the outside building wall line unless shown or noted otherwise Underground or overhead public or private utilities on or adjacent the parcels were not located CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY BARRETT M STACK STILLWATER MINN 55082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR Tel No 439-5630 Note City Sanitary Sewer Service and City Water Service are believed to be stubbed into Lot 7 111 4 Hersey Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater Verify the location and status of available City services with the City of Stillwater The exact loc of City services was not located in conjunction with this survey SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FORT Mr 'Thomas S Peulen 1330 Third Avenue South Stillwater MN 55082 DESCRIPTION, Existing Overall Parcel Description (per Doc No 619181) Lots Seven (7) Eight (8) and Nine (9) Block Four (4) of Hersey Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of Washington County PROPOSED PARCEL 1 DESCRIPTION (vacant land) Lot 7 and the North 6 00 feet of Lot 8 Block 4 Hersey Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater according to the plat thereof on file and of record as Document No 416049 office of the County Recorder of Washington County Minnesota PROPOSED PARCEL 2 DESCRIPTION (contains existing house and garage) Lot 9 and all that part of Lot 8 lying southerly of the North 6 00 feet thereof all in Block 4 Hersey Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater according to the plat thereof on file and of record as Document No 416049, office of the County Recorder of Washington County Minnesota Note This Minor Subdivision as proposed will require variances to building setback requirements as well as the review and approval of the City of Stillwater Parcel 1 contains 7566 square feet more or less Parcel 2 contains 12614 square feet more/or less FP Naery /" J0 Bz ;JI - 1 I14 /2 ti // tt /a 6 .rey'rc z/ k/ A..ve M/J2 sy-- • I• I, • • rr4 0 or l fosec </Y4 Jer r. rrr.o...s e'6 of Zr.. J. r PA,eceb 1 7 7506 . %r NB9'Se zr eaa Nary B) - er. • • .1J+ 1 , GAP -Craw der .r/��- ei z eid l�.er L OO Iff M /JZ F9 - - fezr ,-8a+ yI /1J0 8 � re 1 j-NB9/IG 2/r r - `` Egsr Ia t .ye:i, LG Zii; ssr v \ .4 _% _E x .44 r O I I a344 a` 1:411°. vs,I `% I O I 4 I k 1 1 I — 1.11 z a6 /.r. By.r e i o !o (" ei .v 6zr / 4-NO / /2 • 4"7 AeZEA#/$ 57 11!.vrrto d.PiE,o.✓s sr 1 hereby eendy that this survey plan or report was Prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Sute of Mmnesm •IG z / Date Sept 12 2000 Reg No 13774 Case No V/b7 � Date Filed 10114Ob Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Fees _Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 X Variance $70/200 _Resubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $1 00+50/lot _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material 0 e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with appl►cat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 3RD AUZI , 5 D., Assessor's Parcel No Address of Project t 3 30 Zoning District Description of Project -6ar,5 1 C_ i Sd/ "%7ii4/11 cr - it9fr "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner-TDMAS i UL../� Mailing Address l S'Q 320 Ai`r ,_"s. City - State - Zip f1W,JPff'ige___/ Ma 5332 Telephone No 30 - S►gnature 44J' 6' Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) 57, I x L - `i/ Land Area 75.6(0 SO,- 15 Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \MCNAMARA\SHEILA\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 l ,/ • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-74 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2000 Project Location 107 Lakeside Drive Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicant's Name Colleen Weiss Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required, 18 feet requested) and to the square footage of an accessory building (120 square feet permitted, 144 square feet requested) for the construction of a screened detached porch Discussion The applicant is proposing to construct a 144 square foot screened detached porch Placement of the structure was determined by a retaining wall right behind the house, a septic tank and a very large septic drain field The porch will be located at the nearest point 10 feet from the house The zoning code permits an accessory building in the side or rear yard to be at least six feet from the main building The second part of the variance request for a 144 square foot structure is due to the fact that the footings were poured before the applicant was aware of the square footage allowed for an accessory building Recommendation Approval of the variance for the setback of the accessory structure Denial of the variance for a larger accessory structure Conditions of Approval 1 All plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official 2 The architectural style, materials and colors of the screened house shall match the existing house Findings That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance • • • 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan RCPT# 7377 CHECK# r�`" Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Do-7 7(,A17 ACTION REQUESTED Fees Special/Conditional Use Permit NVariance Resubdivision Subdivision* $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance Design Review $300 $500 $70 $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (0 e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications LL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION , / Address of Project 47 ! /�S.���'J (, Assessor's Parcel No / O20026/4oa37 (GEO Code) Zoning District f�_ Description of Project "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will comp) with file permit if it i granted and used " Property Owne Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature a Representative Mailing Address 5'5-'V- City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed t-0lx 1Z square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \MCNAMAPA\RHGu AUDI nninoo rave 1.. nn nnnn • • 0 roN a I eK rQ PGS�� b+ BK 177D3 PG 577 I v e SCHULENBUR 0033 IW AL_EY y Of a 11 DOC 494 77 U - • of ' _ . —lt LjL ■ L 1-- _1 il ILI L , _ L _iL u ■ _ Ell_ - L r- KEs , I -----[ -- -- I -J- L _ .-1 - IH--- I • I I � I I � • r i 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 I 1 __ t I I I I ! -l-1 -- - -L-- I I --.L -1 i _ ^I _L _! 1 ' i PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/DR/00-75 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2000 Project Location 1709 South Greeley Street Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Industrial Zoning District BP -I Applicants Name John Diana Type of Application Vanance Project Description The request is for a 13'5" to 9'5" setback for parking and dnveway, 20 ft required Discussion The applicant would like approval for the recently poured concrete dnve/parking area located at 1709 Greeley Street The application is for a narrower parking area/dnve setback from Greeley Street (see Map 1) No berm or landscape is provided in the plans to screen the parking area from the street as required by the Business Park Design Guidelines The purpose of the 20 ft setback is to screen the parking area, driveway area from the travel way improving aesthetics of the site The existing parking lot and dnveway as configured dominates the front view of the building The attached plan shows the required setback (cross hashed) The standard dnveway width is 24 ft and the parking space size is 9' x 18' City standards for parking space size, dnveway width and setback can not be met with the existmg configuration If the parking in front of the building is eliminated, space for parking is available to the side and rear of the building The applicant indicated that it is difficult to get out to Greeley from the northerly dnveway and the new dnveway controlled by the street light provides better access This driveway connection could be maintained An alternative design could be developed that eliminates the six parking spaces, provides through dnveway access and meets the setback and landscape screemng requirements The plans were reviewed by the Hentage Preservation Commission at their meeting of November 6, 2000 and they recommended maintaining the required 20 foot setback with buffer and landscaping as provided in the Business Park Distnct design guidelines Recommendation Denial of vanance as constructed/proposed Attachments Application form, plans, HPC staff report • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Fees _Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 / Variance $7` _Resubdivision $10 Subdivision* $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 Certificate of Compliance $70 yDesign Review $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and erg►neer1ng fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project / 70 > 6R6LGY SY Assessor's Parcel No33 050 ,20 t572 (GEO Code) di00 Zoning District JJ Description of Project %�/%'LXe-vt c, rtivit 9 /.5 ' 13 is-�i ,„ (. i;,co.' So //2 y vim �. "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and be/►ef, true and correct I further certify 1 will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner T2l- STA2 P 2oPE2Tl E S 1 c Representative Mailing Address 1 '7 0i G2CE l_Ey 5 i Mailing Address City - State - Zip St LL WA-re2 NIO City - State - Zip Telephone No 1 )F 3 0 l S9 Telephone No S►gnature ^_ S►gnature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces square feet H \MCNAMARA\SHEILA\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 • • • * ,_ TrEStar Properties ILO October 11, 2000 Steve Russell City of Stillwater 216 N 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr Russel Tri-Star Properties LLP located at 1709 Greeley Street in Stillwater would like to request a city variance to construct a cement parking lot with access to the existing stop light at Greeley and Curve Crest Blvd The enblosed drawing represents the setbacks from the curb and the access to the existing driveway to the south As of this date Mr Joe Lux of Washington County Highway Department has given a verbal approval to proceed Our neighbor to the south has been contacted and he also has given verbal permission to connect to the existing driveway, as this driveway is currently located on our property through a previous easement The two reasons for the variance are 1 Allow the parking lot to be closer than the minimum 20' setback 2 Access the stoplight to eliminate the difficult exit to Greeley Street is Tess than the minimum setback Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, John Diana Tri-Star Properties LLP Enclosure (1) JD/cmd 1709 Greeley Street Voice 165114301594 Fax 16517 3510272 • curb 1709 Greeley Street AftsmirdInitirifigirA f 1 • Building Driveway Vow" 411. C70N i 4ci -430 -/,9Y zz','T" • • • -Curb 1709 Greeley Street —Driveway P7.1 5 61 10506 w 6O ORLEANS STREET 6609 P3n 3662 15063 9 • 8 5 50 5003 6 5° 70 (59 7 4P6 8 0 8 8 a 17 6 1 3 2 50 3}636 EASTUIE6 THE WEST 50109 FT 0660 R 3030 wan 10109 8 FQAEi16LOCX2 'N RA66EV 6 CARI8t5 eae "mT+ R g a Pn a 1>ml 7226 • 12 dxav 5096 33 iLyy pmN� >Y 9 6P3V6 CL VAC STREET 6 R 5 VACATED ST CROIX ST DOC 672844 a 60 52 a RAMS LU 6 5 0 CREST P EIl,E141 EF 11V4N 6 UNE 6 LO154,5116 8LO0(6 RA65EV6 CARTERS Ap31101 BLVD D0C 406730 (2017) 0 N UNE CC 552 FT d6m 8 Ow co ohm 0 0 S ADD 2 1R LL w°60 aZ 4 s66 apla 301 65 09 MINN DNR DIV OF WATE PROTECTED WETLAND Al 811O(P 172.96 5566 66 0 FONT OFINTERSECIIQ4BETWEEN TIE NORTH LTE 611E SOJT1145106 FT AFC 72 E C8RER6TE 6 N41 TRAVE LED W DD D 0 U 601 Location Map 4000 CI. 6V CATED GROVE STRUT 6n6 R 6 OIIEMECIICNBETWEEN 77E NORM LINE CC TIE SQ75113027 FT AFC THE C84I630E CF NS TRAVELLEDROAD 5352 K 626.7 R22W R21W R2OW Varuty Map 0 173 Scale in Feet tts ma qe▪ d yWr. Oaary60ea 6 ym6tle•1.12900 rat Rao • m �5 a D6 Pad m bed 6n A6600 Ybnedm 6LYm S O0p0 Q y p • FRANK R CARDARELLE (612) 941-3031 • • Land Surveyor Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (trttficat f urDtv Survey For Ray Kennedy 1709 Greely Street Stillwater, MN 55082 suoTqeooZ quawase2 oN See page 2 for d&scriptionc Book Page File Sec .33,T30,R20 CREEL y 5TR,EET CD Romp ‘6 O NZ coo 0 0 VE %1-9 !at Dee -130 'No /t'V/ This plan, Specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and thad I am a duly l ecristered Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota. Signed this day of `I // _(% , 1995. Frank R Cardarelle State Reg No. 6508 • • • • • H P C APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO DRN/00-75 Heritage Preservation Date November 6, 2000 Project Location 1709 South Greeley Street Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Industrial Zoning District BP -I Applicant's Name John Diana Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review I Discussion The applicant is applying to the Planning Commission for a variance to the 20 foot parking lot setback The request is to construct a concrete parking lot to the edge of the street right of way The West Business Design Guidelines states that "Parking must be screened from the street by berming, bushes, low walls or changes in the grade of parking areas" The 20 foot setback is intended for those uses, not for driveways and parking Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the project, staff recommends the following condition of approval to be conveyed to the Planning Commission 1 At least 5 to 7 feet be designated for screening of the parking lot with plant materials that are mihimuni three feet high Recommendation Denial Findings The project does not meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines Attachments Application Form //- — o 0 ///-7 L 4- t.._ Gr kwGi /lt 7v/A-en-I.Gpv deiyw7 A-e76(4-it .A ike /5P—t i2e'.s 1 ZONINCI c Research laboratones d Business, professional and medical office services e Finance, insurance and real estate office services (3) Special permitted uses Special permitted uses in the BP -I district are as follows a Radio and television facilities b Printing, publishing and allied in- dustries c General warehousmg and outside storage d Outside storage (must be screened) e M. nistorage f Wholesale trade g Commercial nursenes h Retail sales of products manufac tured on the site so long as no more than 20 percent of building floor area is for retail purposes i Cultural or governmental facilities (movie theater, hbranes and fire sta tons) (4) Use determination A special use permit may be granted for other uses in the BP -I district determined to be of the same general character as the foregomg uses and which will not impair the present or potential use of adjacent properties The findings of same general character shall be made by the plannmg commission and a special use permit shall be approved and issued by the city council (5) General regulations General regulations in the BP -I distnct are as follows a Height of building maxi MUM b Minimum lot area c Setbacks Front Rear Side 40 feet 1 acre 40 feet 30 feet 20 feet Abutting residential distnct 75 feet (6) (Ord 'J5-0,p,1 J 31 d Lot area coverage maximum impervious 60 percent of lot area e Landscaped area minimum 20 percent of lot area f Front and side yard setbacks shall b cape esign regulations Design regulations fo the BP -I distract are as follows See West Busmess Park Plan Special Site and De- sign Regulations, pages 18-20 o 729, 8-7-90) ubd-21 1 l Horneoccupation s reguulairons The regulations contained in this subdivision with regard to home occupations are intended to con- trol over any,inconsistent regulations that might appear in this Code (1) Type I home occupations are permitted uses in the RA, LR, TR, CR or RB zoning distracts if the home occupation is in com- pliance with the following regulations a No outside storage or display of prod ucts, equipment, or merchandise, b No in person retail sales, c No traffic that is greater than the residential level of the neighbor- hood, d No separate business entrance, e No signs, f Not more than 15 percent of the total gross floor area of a dwelling unit or 300 square feet, whichever is less is devoted to home occupation use, g No activity or equipment may be used that creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odor, or electric or tele- vision interference is permitted if it is detectable by adjacent neighbors, h All Type I home occupations must be registered with the zoning admuus- trator on a form provided by the city, and 1 Any Type I home occupation use that exceeds the standards set forth in this section requires a special use permit Supp No 1 CD31 23 .16 • • • DESIGN GUIDELINES Design guidelines have been developed for the West Stillwater Business District to ensure consistent quality design The guidelines will be used to review new development proposals Architectural Standards 1 Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, standard concrete block or metal siding shall not be used as exterior materials for new buildings Architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels may be acceptable 2 All roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash storage areas shall be completely enclosed with building material compatible with the principle structure Low profile self contained mechanical units which blend in with the building design located to the side or rear of the building may be permitted. 3 Architectural consistency on all sides of the building is required in terms of colors, material and details Landscape Standards 1 Street trees shall be required for all new development The type of tree and their location shall be approved by the Director of Parks 2 All area of a lot not used or improved for parking, driveways or storage areas shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, flower and ground cover 3 All new trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from a growing site with a tree spade and be a 2-1/2 inch caliber for deciduous trees, 6 foot in height for evergreens and 1-1/2 inch caliber for ornamental trees 4 No more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be of one species No trees shall be American Elms, Box Elder, Poplar or Fearcele Ginko A minimum 20-foot wide landscaped front yard setback area shall be maintained along all public streets and 10 oo• si a yar landscaped area maintains on all o+her sides 6 A minimum of 10 percent of parking and driveway areas shall be landscaped with trees and shrubs 7 All utilities must be underground and utility meters screened or integrated into the building structure Signs 1 Signs and related building graphics shall be a part of the overall building and site design Sign size, height, 20 • • • location and material shall relate to building scale and design 2 Wall signs or low profile (maximum 6 feet in height) shall be permitted for office, warehouse, wholesale or industrial uses 3 Retail signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance 4 A landscaped area equal to twice the sign area comprised of bushes or flowers shall be provided around the base of free standing signs 5 Multi -tenant buildings may have a low profile free standing building or site location sign as well as individual tenant signs Site Plan 1 On -site lighting shall serve functional safety and aesthetic purposes 2 Overall lighting shall be directed down and shielded from adjacent properties or roadways All lights shall be contained on the property 3 Maximum height of parking lot lighting next to residential areas shall be 20 feet Parking shall be screened from the street by berming, bushes, low walls or changes in the grade of parking reas 5 All loading areas shall be located to the rear or side of the building and screened and buffered from building on adjacent lots 6 Parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent residential areas by a solid masonry wall or equivalent 10 feet of landscaped gutter on the commercial side of the wall 7 All outside storage areas shall be screened with opaque fencing and landscaping that will grow up th'ree years to cover 50 percent of the fence face area 8 Sidewalks shall be provided between residential areas and commercial destinations, schools and park areas 21 • • Nt ZONING 4 Entrance to and exit from the lot are to be located on the lot 5 No advertising sign or material is to be located on the lot 6 All parking is to be kept back of the setback building line by a barrier unless otherwise specif- ically authonzed by the city council 7 The parking lot and that por- tion of the driveway back of the setback line is to be adequately screened from the street and from adjoining property in a residential district by a hedge or sightly fence or wall not less than six feet high and not more than eight feet high located back of the setback line All lighting is to be arranged so that there will be no glare therefrom an- noying to the occupants of ad- joining property in a residen- tial distnct and surfacing of the parking lot is to be smoothly graded, hard surfaced and ade- quately drained 8 Such other conditions as may be deemed necessary by the city council to protect the character of the residential distnct Design requirements Design requirements shall be as follows a Parking space Each parking space shall be at least nine feet in width and 18 feet in length exclusive of an adequate y esigned system of ac- cess drive Dnveways_ for two-way traffic shall be 24 feet e:-.) Parking facility layout There shall be no off-street parking spaces lo- cated within 15 feet of any street 'right-ot-way or ten feet of any prop- erty line except -in the central busi- neiTaistnct where spaces may be allowed with an approved design per- mit CD3167 �311 c Access to spaces or facilities Drive- way design standards are as follows 1 Driveways shall be designed to conform with existing contours to the maximum extent feasi- ble 2 Dnveways shall enter public/ private streets in such a man- ner as to maintain an adequate line of sight d Aisles Circulation aisles necessary for maneuvenng within a parking facility shall be designed so that vehicles do not back out into a street, sidewalk or other public way, other 'than a residential alley In general, double -loaded aisles are preferred to single -loaded aisles urbing All commercial, industrial or multifamily residential parking lots with five or more spaces shall have continuous concrete curbing around the entire parking lot f Border barrtcades Every parking fa- cihty containing angled or 90-degree parking spaces adjacent to a street right-of-way shall, except at en- trance and exit drives, be developed with a solid curb or barrier along such street nght-of-way line, or shall be provided with a suitable concrete barrier at least six inches in height and located not less than two feet from such street right-of-way line Such wall, fence, curb or barrier shall be securely installed and maintained g Surfacing All off-street parking fa- cilities shall be surfaced with a min- imum of five inches of concrete, or P(2 inches of asphalt overlying four inches of base rock except temporary off-street parking facilities, which may be surfaced by placement of a single bituminous surface treatment upon an aggregate base, which bitu- minous treatment and base shall be subject to the approval of the direc- tor of public works All off-street �y • • 31-1 STI LLWATER CODE parking shall be so graded and drained as to dispose of all surface water from within the area, m no case shall such drainage be allowed to cross sidewalks h Marking Parking spaces within a facihty shall be clearly painted and delineated i Lighting Any lights provided to illu- minate any parking facility permit- ted by this subdivision shall be ar- ranged so as to reflect the hght away from any adjacent properties, streets or highways J ndscaping and screening Land- scaping shall be provided in new parking lot construction and recon- struction Landscaping is employed to diminish the visibility and impact of parked cars by screening and vi- sually separating them from sur- rounding activities and the street, to provide shade and relief from paved areas, to channel the flow of traffic, and generally contribute to good site design Trees, shrubs, ground cover- ing and earth terming shall be used for lot landscaping Every parking facility abutting property located in residential distracts shall be sepa rated from such property by a wall, planter or a view-obscunng fence, or a raised landscaped mound of earth, sand stones or the like, or by a permanently maintained compact ev- ergreen hedge, or a combination of any of the preceding treatments Such screening devices shall be six feet in height, measured from the grade of the finished surface of such parking facihty, along the abutting residen- tial property Subd 25 1 Off street loadtng factltttes Off- street loading facilities shall be regulated as fol- lows (1) Purpose The purpose of the regulations in this subdivision is to reduce street congestion and traffic hazards, and to add to the safety and convenience of the com- munity Adequate, attractively designed and functional facihties for off-street load- ing shall be incorporated as necessary m conjunction with new uses of land in the city (2) General provisions For every building erected, which is to be occupied by man- ufactunng, storage, warehouse, retail and/or wholesale store, market, hotel, hos- pital, mortuary, laundry, dry cleaning or other uses similarly requinng the receipt or distnbution by vehicles of matenal and merchandise, off-street loading areas shall be provided in accordance with the require- ments in this subdivision (3) Required areas Required areas are as follows a. Gross Floor Area 10,000 to 24,999 square feet 25,000 to 49,999 square feet For each additional 50,000 square feet or ma jor fraction thereof Required Loading Spaces 1 2 1 b Each loading space shall be not less than ten feet in width, 30 feet in length and with an overhead clear- ance of 14 feet c The space may occupy all or any part of any required yard or court space, except for any exterior side yards, and shall not be located closer than 50 feet to any lot in an R district, unless inside a structure or sepa- rated from such district by a wall not less than eight feet in height, pro- vided a conditional fence permit is approved (Ord No 831, 9-3-96) Subti-=26`'Sign- regulattons -Sign regulations= „,for_this section_are as follows 1 urpose Signs have an impact on the character and quality of the environment CD3168 �5 7 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/00-77 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2000 Project Location 2160 Oak Glen Trail Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicant's Name Mary Schulte Type of Application Special Use Permit for a Type II Home Occupation Permit Project Description A Special Use Permit for a Type II Home Occupation Permit for a massage therapy business Discussion The request is to apply for a Type II Home Occupations Use Permit to conduct a therapeutic massage business out of the applicant's home On October 14, 1996, the applicant was granted a Special Use Permit to operate her therapeutic massage business out of her home at 628 West Olive Street She has since moved to the above address and is requesting a permit to conduct the same business as she was granted in 1996 The attached letter from the applicant states that - hours are between 8 00a m and 7 30 p m Monday — Friday, -no additional employees, - minimal traffic, 4 —6 appointments scheduled throughout the day, - all parking will be on -site, -no outside storage or display of any products, equipment or merchandise, -any retail sales would be accessory or incidental to the primary residential use, - all customers will be scheduled by appointment, - there will be no sign on the property, - total floor area for the business is 337 sq ft which is less the 20% of the total gross floor area of the dwelling (1,026 sq ft ) The clients will enter through the front door and proceed to the second floor where there is an office, a session room and a guest bathroom Staff has received no complaints about the applicant's previous therapeutic massage business on Olive Street • • • Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 Hours are between 8 00a m and 7 30 p m Monday — Friday, 2 2 No additional employees, 3 Minimal traffic, 4 —6 appointments scheduled throughout the day, 4 All parking will be on -site, 5 No outside storage or display of any products, equipment or merchandise, 6 Any retail sales would be accessory or incidental to the primary residential use, 7 All customers will be scheduled by appointment, 8 There will be no sign on the property, 9 Total floor area for the business is 337 sq ft which is Tess the 20% of the total gross floor area of the dwelling (1,026 sq ft ) Findings The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter/Floor Plan/Photos/Site Plan/Petition/Letters from Neighbors/Minutes from 10/6/96 Planning Commission Meeting • • • Mr Roetman, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No SUB/96-62 A subdivision to subdivide Lot 10, Block 8, WIlkin's Addition into two equal lots in the RB, Two -Family Residential District William and Dawn Tunison, applicant Mr Tunison explained the proposal is to split the property into two equal lots, each 60 feet in width The required front yard width in the Two - Family District is 50 feet Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Valsvik, moved approval, all in favor Case No SUP/96-63 A special use permit for a sign at the entrance of Autumn Wood residential development located on Autumn Wood Way and County Road 5 in the RB, Two -Family Residential District John Roettger, applicant Mr Roettger was present He explained the design and location of the sign Mr Valsvik, seconded by Mr Charpentier, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor VCase No SUP/96-64 A special use permit for a home occupation use permit for a massage therapy business out of a residence located at 628 W Olive St in the RB, Two -Family Residential District Mary Schulte, applicant Ms Schulte said she had a petition signed by neighbors approving the business use The business would be part-time and by referral only She said there is space for two cars, only one client would be present at a time Mr Roetman, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No SUP/96-65 A special use permit for construction of an automotive oil change and glass company located on Lot 5, Block 1, Market Place 4th Addition in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Chad Junker, C & D Enterprises, applicant • • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED Fees Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 Variance $70/200 Resubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 $300 $500 $70 $25 Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance Design Review *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project e7/60 oak lr/e., Tiata Assessor's Parcel Nohf 3 (34.c I Oak c-4. (GEO Code)' kart Zoning District 79 Description of Project I—l/.e Jr Occ #,n1,jer#,v+ c c l!he / o 4 r nary Sc�c c.Ite J ✓74Sific. "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Y'7o.y ;7 k/Sc4u /4fe as of ///7/o3 Representative . -Le as o w' Mailing Address a/lam o Oak ! /e., /e ai / Mailing Address City - State - Zip 3 f) //1. ✓q"fr,, i'114/.S3-04,2 City - State - Zip Telephone No (6.N193...5 /— 0 'ate Signature , , SITE AND PROJECT DESCRI PTION .up'rQu/4 e .7Z Qu-t �In,s Lot Size (dimensions) ' x Total Building floor area /, cS_ a square feet/ Land Area 3 4, 06 G S F ..crr1 j� Existing square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed square feet Principal Paved Impervious Area square feet Accessory No of off-street parking spaces a c 4-s/ Telephone No Signature • • • Monday, October 16, 2000 Planning Commission/City Council City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Regarding Request for a Type II Home Occupations Special Use Permit for my therapeutic massage business at our new home located at 2160 Oak Glen Trail m Stillwater, MN effective Friday, November 17, 2000 I've successfully operated a home practice in therapeutic massage m Stillwater for the past four years at 628 W Ohve Street I'm a Nationally Certified Massage Therapist and have complied with the requirements of my existing special use permit Attached are letters from neighbors and clients confirming our standing as good neighbors during this time At our new residence clients will enter through the front door of our home and proceed to the second floor where my office, a session room, and a guest bathroom are located I will comply with the following conditions of the Type II permit • There is no outside storage or display of any products, equipment or merchandise, • Any retail sales would be accessory or incidental to the primary residential use, • All customers will be scheduled by appointment • There will be no signs and the property will retain its appearance as a private residence at all times • There is adequate off-street parking for cars in the driveway • The total floor area for the business is 337 sq ft which is less than 20% of the total gross floor area of the dwelling (2052 sq ft finished l vmg area, 1,026 Sq Ft foundation) • Business hours will be between 8 00 a m. and 7 30 p m. Monday — Friday, • There will be no additional employees • There will be minimal traffic from my busmess due to the small number of appointments (4-6) scheduled throughout the day at 1 'h - 2 hour intervals It's my sincere hope that I meet all the conditions and requirements to be granted a Type II Home Occupations Use Permit Photos of the property and room dimensions, a neighborhood petition, and letters from previous neighbors and clients are attached Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions Sincerely, J4 D.,,c_G/_ Mary Sc e Mary Schulte Therapeutic Massage 651/351-0906 00 x-c - • • • • Ojf:LC— °)1s1:4—"") Cc- 5CT cc Cl Mq J�f VOV14\ E Glo,;eT &-e" �o0-1/rx • • 2160 Oak Glen Trail, Stillwater, MN • /. a..s (2Seife+7 e' f 1 Ic, X c n EA/ i 3MO4..Si Ft 8.../4 n SS/b.clr 0 4 yet T. c-abe 4 tz 3O A IN • • ^ • • Petition Concerning Mary Schulte's Application for A Home Occupation Use Permit at 2160 Oak Glen Trail We, the undersigned, are neighbors of the residence located at 2160 Oak Glen Trail m Stillwater, MN We have been informed of Mary Schulte's desire to operate a home business in therapeutic massage We understand that the nature of her practice has been based largely on doctor referrals for the past four years, and that she mamtams high ethical and professional standards We also understand that Mary Schulte is a Nationally Certified Massage Therapist and a member of the American Massage Therapy Association We understand that the followmg conditions will exist if she is granted a special use permit for her business • There will not be any new structures or additions to the property that relate to her busmess, and it will retain its appearance as a pnvate residence, • There will not be any exterior signage, • There will be mmmmal traffic from her business do to the small number of client visits scheduled throughout the day Monday through Friday • There is adequate parkmg in the driveway, Therefore we, the undersigned, have no objection to the City of Stillwater granting Mary Schulte's Therapeutic Massage a home occupation use permit for her business at the above mentioned address NAME ADDRESS DATE 1 t .ur►.� ��/� otiLa, i/J/o20cD 2 r616 2 291 Oak 61241-fcti 1c3 /3) Zoo r 3 fa(moo 4 A,7J -111 G, ' 5 4.l- 61(J-4 c 1: (-.Tn,cto )312000 01111 0CUC 101����41 0) (S1 Cal 6( 6li,i /6 3/40 c-I -k O CCU( to 7 �1\k, Q3K-1‘3\ Gv‘kcjt„,I613/2Q-v • • (Occupation Use Permit Petition Continued ) a 8 &OIL. pThQrLvVt too 6A a ( IO/-/czJ 9 �i_ l I ' �� 011 S I L_ _v_i 1, /OA�c� ;6).;/) 10 11 12 4-4'41-4--/Ir .222t44,26.30 2 I k %` / 1G sue... 22S 07,it, (1 iV/3/vo 13 ,'ILi1 d-4" 6-7('1 C ,�' /D�-f/ is z,62&74.&4�,fx. 1950 ((Oak-h2&K_CA 45/60 15 ek2-1 ('�� I570 ocaQZ )9,11QQ...12 /a/s/oa 16 C900 CauAitlileurN -20 Ocki (--)(Q1,1 ita /°/5702) 17 /39 *lift Skih,figin 18 p aaSO ouK (a/eJAi0/s/oo 19 CAA-1eA,@___ zZIG 014-tom' Cee-,-CP *100 20 1J )35 v a <L 6 21 <cLW,Li-f--) bOrdlix, 3-C° orzi .e/-hti 67- 2 F) O'airii - 10151ru 22 rs��4n�ps eteMy_ <2Oo07nalliA-d- o?.51 64 414 17z 15/03 23 23 �( ��� 3 ✓c,ce�Pficif/l1 24 164 f I e - J - r( earIP �—, /(7/5 r • • 25 :%-tt. '( 26 1.404/7 /44,( V-e-1 4 /L (,-�t,.., )4,7/ Of? G1,2v La Lc 2 l q! d u !c G/,r w Tra i I • • • October 3, 2000 To Whom It May Concern Mary and Paul Schulte have been our neighbors across the street for the past eight years My husband and I have also known Mary as our massage therapist since she completed her training four years ago I highly recommend her for a special use permit to operate a busmess out of their new home In the past four years we have never had any problems m the neighborhood with excess traffic from Mary's business since she only sees one person at a time and the number of client visits seem to be spread throughout the day She maintains very high integrity in her practice and is professional at all tunes We sincerely hope she will be granted a special use permit for her new residence Sincerel ti De � Du� r � ��� 713 W Olive Street, Sti 1water, MN • October 9, 2000 To whom it may concern, We are neighbors of Mary Schulte We would like to confirm the fact that her in -home business has not effect the neighborhood m any negative way We forget it's even there Actually there is less traffic at her home than ours due to our children's many activities and is probably the case for most of our other neighbors Smcerely, Barb & Joe Schmotter • • • • From the desk of Lowell H Schmoeckel ‘,4e 7)/1-s-44- /4/ (A✓ O // Ir( (' unaFn.anwutt)tty Igigl,t.(!anWlar Or T r 1 ♦ Two YT Tian of %maw 1 n • J • • October 2, 2000 To whom it inay concern, Mary Schulte has been giving therapeutic to myself and my husband for the better part of four years, I have multiple sclerosis and Mary has helped me to keep myflexibility This is so important to my well being, My husband is the senior pastor at Trinity Lutheran Church and there are certain seasons, Christmas and Easter especially, when Maty helps him to relax and focus on the incredible job he has to do, Without her professionalism and confidentiality, we would not be able to continue wall massage, She is super and has the heart of an angel, She will be a wonderful neighbor and keeps her yard and house immaculate, We always feel very comfortable in Paul and Mary's home, The Schultes will be great neighbors Sincerely, (� a„ 1Z� 'ti Asz Pastor and Mrs, Lee Sather • • October 2, 2000 To Whom It May Concern We have known Mary Schulte for four years during which time Joetta has received her services as a massage therapist Mary is an excellent therapist and has very high ethical and professional standards We know she is very conscientious about her work and is someone who can be trusted by her clients and friends We highly recommend her as a massage therapist and someone deserving of a special use permit to operate her business out of her home Sincerely, Joetta Kuprian, Nurse Anesthetist C:7?-e4-4at.1.-• George Kuprian, Assistant Washington County Attorney • • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/00-79 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2000 Project Location 1616 West Olive Street Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Pastor Steven Molin, representing Our Saviors Lutheran Church Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit to replace an existing sign at Our Saviors Lutheran Church Discussion The request is for approval of a new sign for the church The sign will replace an existing ground lit sign The proposed internally lit sign is 6 feet by 8 feet "Our Saviors Lutheran Church" will not be lit The white panel with four lines of eight -inch Iettenng is backlit Color of the church name is aqua on a tan background Black Iettenng is on the white panel In order to make the sign compatible with a residential neighborhood, staff is recommending it should be installed directly into the ground instead in a raised planter eliminating two feet Also it is staffs suggestion that the sign should be installed without the cedar trim shown in exhibit B There are two reasons for this suggestion 1 Without the cedar trim it takes on the modern character of the church 2 The trim adds bulk and height to the sign There is at least one other existing sign with the church name on it It will be staffs recommendation that other signs be removed Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 All changes to the approval be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 Exhibit A shall be used without the planter 3 The sign shall be installed at ground level 4 To avoid the harsh glare of white bulbs muted white bulbs or low voltage bulbs shall be used 5 All other signage shall be removed from the site Attachments Application Form/Letter/Exhibits A and B/Site Plan HPC Recommendation 11/6/00 —Approved as Conditioned +5-0 • • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Fees XSpecial/Conditional Use Permit $5 00 --s# Variance $70/220 _Resubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $100+50/lot _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The appl►cant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with appl►cat►on becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Protect /(,/& G✓ - Oh 51 Assessor's Parcel No 9D DG 7�G04� Zoning District kei (GEO Code) Description of Project Ne.441 Ckuna. sr o v ert cc. 01 d sicr, 14 5 d Zv cart w.. (6.c au -se vsC ck w r z�rcr� 1 "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner (9(.4.1 Mailing Address /(91(, to OI1\/. SF City - State - Zip S4, /14.4 , Mt SS -all? Telephone No 'it `f 3g - 5 7 o Signature Representative I'ar,37k S e" titohii Mailing Address /L/6 64) O/ivy Sf- City - State - Zip 5+illwaskn, N o/ 5'5"'ab'7—_ Telephone No 5-/ Y35-5'705' Signature Pe.41 itIIA 63 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3C/ " / 4/ Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \MCNAMARA\SHEIL API ANAPP PRM I1in.99 9nnn v • • • Date Friday, October 20, 2000 To Members of Community Development Department From Pastor Steve Molin — Our Savior's Lutheran Church Subject New Church Sign To whom it may concern, Our Savior's Lutheran Church is experiencing an exciting period of growth and transition During this period of time, many of our members have commented on the condition of our old church sign Installed approximately twenty years ago, its wood posts are rotting and it is in a severe state of deterioration The board of Our Savior's Lutheran Church recently voted to replace the old sign with an updated and better quality church sign The proposed sign is the same width and height as the old sign The main difference between the two is that the new sign has a back -lit feature, which we believe will compliment the surrounding neighborhood Here are the reasons for this thought process • The new sign is much more attractive than the old sign As stated, the old sign was deteriorating and unsightly • The back -lit feature will be less intrusive for surrounding neighbors (the old sign utilized floodlights, which were brighter and probably more annoying) • The new sign utilizes florescent tubes behind the sign panels This will give off a soft light appearance, as with most signs of this nature • The panel where the lettering will be is only 33 7/8" high by 891/2" wide The colored renderings depict phrases that the sign company selected We do not intend to use these phrases Thank you for your consideration of this project If there is anything I can do to accommodate this request, please call me „274, vi„..,_ if, • • • 8' ; _ . ur Savior's FOUR LINES OF EIGHT INCH CHANGEABLE LETTERING OR SLIDE IN PANELS 10' • Rendenng of Sign Installed andikimmed with Cedar • 7 , / 1, e ....`,-, / 1. , 's. -9 „ i , ; 1.'"i'-- 1,..4 ‘,. r,;'.., .,-,5016 r t •,), J40,t 4 .c, „ ,,,,.., , A 1 4, ,j) :, 's ';',., ••• ,,,,lie ,-, , - ,,,, ij 2,..4., I 1 1,fr' a' { , s, 1 s , ,c, i 4 IF-ite.11-' / '-'0' "' ‘ ''' '` l VE' FOUR LI EIGHT I C LETTE SLIDE I ttt.‘c_rf. IAT-STL. oPTIok tr. 00 • • TO d 113101 35 Psr i 5 -O 3/8 10 -0 8/8" B 0 3/8 8 - 5 LAMPSON 12' CENTERS 3/8 SEIr TAP BOLES (6 REO 0) 1 1 INSTALL Y7 PHOTO CELL 60' 100 3/B' SCALE 3/4' = 1-0" j ID AREA 151"A gCl/Z1 4 I, � �/Zu etc Arebi 33 /g 4 X 1/6 SO TUBE 6/18 GA CAP E 0 - LEAVE IN 2X 4 00X 700)fr ORDER #13936A1 JOB #___�_ - FRAME #_-- - - FACE (REF) 5 -0 3/8 X 8 -0 3/8" D/F 8" PERSONA 1 1/2' FLAT RETAINER 2 - 4' SO TUBES (INCLUDED) BASE PLATE MOUNTS ELEC OUT - LEAVE IN 2 X 4 90X UL SPECS INCLUDE LAMPS INSTALL FACES PAINT LACRYL SERIES 95 MATCH DAR 23013 SMOKE BROWN INCLUDE LEGS CRATE SHIP FRAME/LEGS SEPERATE 5 X 8 FRAME 1 FROM INVENTORY (SA10176/178) NS 2 58 1/6 NS 4 47 1/2 81 ALUM RW 1 58 1/8 AWM RW-C 1 27 1/8' AWM RW-C 2 5 ( TUBE 2 119/16 -1/2' ?X 4X3/16 1/8 SO(LEG) PLATE 2 3/4 X 12 X 6 (SA10173) GUSSET 4 FROM INVENTORY (SA10196) 8 PR SOCKETS 2 472-AT BALLASTS (5 60 AMPS/120 V) 0�-- --13 9' 2/4 X 12 X 6 PLATES 1" HOLES/NOS' BOLTS SCALE 1 I/2" m 1-0" UM PRINT NOT TO SLUE ...T. a: l'uar+ MILM, IMM .a r-0 J/► II 0 —0 1/e �. iIM ■ n.. x Taim Mom. - am.. wr w SIGNS PLUS W. IMM 000Z-TZ-d3S DNI 1NOS83d TO/TO d TZSE Z88 SO9 T rmat 11 OPEN WOO WTI EXISTING 1 1111 I111 ■r_•i /.`■■ •i —p.•■ ■ 64111111 IRIS !ling!! ip "Aprivie C-..0'.r =■_7 r 0•1kI• O..,—r■.1. ■ iirls� N : 111611. .&-III..II'I ■■■aMWill itlllh111U1 l llI tttlslll!Itl:jliiIIi 1111111111116 Ci•:1111:111111 • • w■_■■■A ■ MAMA 174 1111111111 w i MIMI Mal Er New Sign to be positioned WEST OLIVE STRUT in same location as old sign 0 25 50 :'9CK STREE 1! ■1Stv nll ►, 100 1 OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA Sess ng Architects, Inc. • 190 Northpark Corporate Center • 6 Pine Tree Dnve • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55112 • (612) 490-1470 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-80 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2000 Project Location 14949 62nd Street North Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Washington County Government Center Type of Application Vanance Project Description A variance to the height limits for installation of a 17 foot and 22 foot long antenna Discussion The request is to install two antennas on the Washington County Government Center The antennas would be used by the Shenffs Department for communication The visual impact of the antennas is minimal from surrounding areas and the antennas are needed for public health and safety Conditions of Approval 1 The location of the antennas shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director to minimize visual impact of the installation Recommendation Approval as conditioned Attachments Application form and plans 1 t _ i AH c1 08810 CITY OF STILLWATER PAGE 02 • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Y)oo 8o Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit XVanance Resubdivislon _Subdivision* $100 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $ Zoning Amendment* $ Planning Unit Development * $ _Certificate of Compliance $ Design Review $ io ees 200 00 0 50/lot 00 00 00 0 5 *An escrow fee Is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attac d) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and suppo . ng material submitted In connection with any application All supporting material (: e, phot s, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project thin 6,74t a /J //wcr'Assessor s Parcel No 33030.20440003 toning D,s•r,ctP-A 6-147f'ri t Description of Protect .1 1 e? M «r (Gfo9ad®) o �.ra� S4..Cs a 0-v-4.- at f le 04.Q �61,-entt,riuz_..t,C�. . ° hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submlff herewith In all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I furth certify 1 will comply with file permit If it is granted and used " Property Owner MKS -%t ('.o Mailing Address /49 49 /.,2 0 i /v City - State - zip ,5-j' ww-+er M60$2_. I elephone ;a _; 7833 Signature !! � „ jl - _ Lot Size (dimensions) x L and Area Height of Buildings Stories Principal Accessory Representative 8 ern, e. Mare c 7 Mailing Address_/SD/5- �� t ${ City - State - Zip'7//Warr SSoez- Telephone No 4S'/ 4-3o - 7g-33 P Signature )t(�7 SITEND PROJECT/DESCRIPTION eet Total Building floor area squar feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces Decibel Products Accessones Photograph Page http //www decibelproducts com/netscape/net30799/db304/pdb304 hti r • • • byecrk 6G PD s-al Ltrte ti�r .F. dL'yyy`� Photo of Model ■XiDB304 Antenna Return to Model DB304 Data Sheet ALLEN TELECOM INC DECIBEL PRODUCTS DIVISION PHONE 1 800 676 5342 (214) 631 0310 FAX 1 800 229 4706 (214) 631 4706 1 of 1 10/24/00 9 33 AM Whip radiator Whip Insulat( Skirt — in (m Support pipe Maximum exi Lateral thrust Bending mon at 100 mpl Wind rating Survival wi Survival wi Overall length Net weight ( Shipping weic Mounting clay P e- tg, EP � UNITY GApg COAXIAL IN, 33-174 MHz (7 fev7 NTENNA An excellent performer in extreme conditions the DB205 is a heavy duty unity gain omiii antenna for 33 174 MHz Models are cut to frequency and tested at the factory however uncut models are available • Rugged Absorbs severe vibration and withstands rough handling ideal for oil well drilling and similar applications • Effective Design Includes a coaxial half wave dipole antenna with an upper quarter wave whip radiator a center insulator and lower quarter wave skirt radiator isolated from the antenna support pipe • Tough Insulator Molded of durable epoxy and virtually unbreakable • Moisture Resistant A feed through connector and top mounting stud are molded iiito the insulator which also simplifies the replacement of the radiator or feeder cable • Enduring Metals - The upper radiating element is spring tempered stainless steel the lower skirt is non corroding brass • Easy Mounting Galvanized steel DB365 OS Mount is furnished for mounting atop a tower, pole or building Ordering Information Use model number for correct frequency and specify termination if non standard Order jumper cable separately if desired MODEL DB205 FREO 0A111 ■'PATTERNEPl 150 MHz■''Plane —0-10,.- ik vror-----;------ t.%:. .4'4 ' 2; 5*.P1,,l- '•„II; 15 5 SSW 0 dBd Reference Gain 0 dBd 0 dB Models F and M are UPS Shippable Electrical Data� Frequency Ranges — MHf A = 33 5Il1B = 50 72 C = 72 88 E44 F = 144 175 Uncut models L = 33 50 M = 150 174 Bandwidth 2% of frequency VSWR 1 5 to 1 or less Nominal impedance — ohms 50 Gain (over hall wave dipole) — dB Unity Maximum power input — watts 500 Vertical beamwidth (half power points) 78 Lightning protection Direct ground Standard Termination Captive Type N Male attached to end of flexible lead Other fittings are available on special order If UHF connector is required an adapter is provided Mechanical Data 35 MHz 50 MHz 75 MHz 160 MHz 17 7 PH stainless steel rod it Molded epoxy m) Brass 2 (50 8) diameter — in (mm) Galvanized steel 1 (25 4) dia 24 (609 6) or more available for mounting 17 7 PH stainless steel rod Molded epoxy Brass 2 (50 8) diameter Galvanized steel 1 (25 4) dia 24 (609 6) or more available for mounting 17 7 PH stainless steel rod Molded epoxy Brass 2 (50 8) diameter Aluminum 1 (25 4) dia 24 (609 6) or more available for mounting 17 7 PH stainless steel rod Molded epoxy Brass 2 (50 8) diameter Aluminum 1 (25 4) dia 24 (609 6) or more available for mounting )osed area (flat plate equivalent) — ft2 (m2) 1 2 (11) at 100 mph (161 km/hr) — lbf (N) 48 (213 5) 1 0 (09) 40 (180) 0 7 (07) 28 (124 5) 3 ( 03) 12 (53 4) rent 12 (3 66 m) below skirt r (161 km/hr) — ft lbs (kg m) 188 (26 02) thout ice — mph (km/hr) over 110 (177) th 5 (12 7 mm) radial ice — mph (km/hr) 110 (177) 135 (18 68) over 125 (201) over 125 (201) 50 (6 92) over 125 (201) over 125 (201) 19 (2 63) over 125 (201) over 125 (201) _in (mm) 217 (5511 8) 206 (5232 4) 119 (3022 6) 71 (1803 4) /clamps) — lbs (kg) 38 (17 24) iht (w/clamps) — lbs (kg) 52 (23 59) nps (Galvanized steel) DB365 OS 36 (16 33) 50 (22 68) DB365 OS 27 (12 25) 35 (15 88) DB365 OS 19 (8 62) 26 (11 79) DB365 OS 10 All Eli TELECOM GROUP DECIBEL PRODUCTS DIVISION PHONE 1 800 676 5342 (214) 631 0310 FAX 1 800 229 4706 (214) 631 4706 Radomes Radomes are available for most Andrew antennas Radomes reduce wind loading to the tower while proved ing added protection for the feed from the elements There are two types of radomes flexible and molded Flexible radomes are provided on shielded antennas and molded radomes are options to standard and focal plane antennas All radomes have a standard minimum wind survival of 125 mph (200 km/h) Flexible Radomes Flexible radomes are either Hypalon or TEGLAR® material These materials are stretched and tensioned across the opening of the shield ' The radome flexes slightly in the wind shedding ice and snow in most environments Optional Colors Aviation Orange ANDRE W, Green Brown L/,', o i 14-f Hypalon is a rubber coated nylon material that is durable and suited for most normal environments The standard color is white Field painting is optional TEGLAR® is a polymer coated fiberglass material that pro vides the greatest protection in harsh environments A special version of the TEGLAR radome is available with high wind series antennas The standard color is white Optional colors are available TEGLAR radomes cannot be field painted FPHP antennas include molded radomes 4 ft (1 2 m) TEGLAR radome is pre tensioned Light Tan Gray Beige Customer Service Center Call toll free from USA Canada and Mexico 1 800 255 1419 4 and 6 ft Standard and Focal Plane Antennas Attachment Potnt for Optional Side Strut J Bolt Circle Diameter Optional Molded Radome Note Except for FP Type 2 7 GHz and Below Antennas Do Not Have Fine Azimuth Adjustments Rear View 4 5 in (115 mm) Diameter Mounting Pipe (not included) a4A #DREW Customer Service Center CaII toll free from USA Canada and Mexico 1 800 255 1479 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/00-81 Planning Commission Date November 13, 2000 Project Location 1655 Market Drive Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicants Name Chad Bouley - Kellison Company representing Heritage Embroidery Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit — use determination - to conduct light industrial with retail sales in the Business Park Commercial zoning district Discussion The request is for a special use permit —use determination- for Heritage Embroidery, that is planning to relocate from River Heights Mall Heritage Embroidery sells clothing (particularly sports clothing) with emblems embroidered on them The business has a retail sales area and an area where the sewing of the emblems occurs A sewing room is considered light industry and therefor needs a use permit There is no odor, noise or toxic produced in the sewing room The building will have an enclosed trash receptacle Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission for revocation if complaints are received regarding the sewing room Findings The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Construction Documents 10 QOCT 4oue 00a9 12 5 43088 Du AiKELLISON NO 4a1 CITY OF STILLWATER P 2/3 PAGE 02 • Case No Date Filed Fee Pald Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED Fees _Special/Conditional Use Permit '50/200 Variance : 70/200 _Resubdivielon ; 100 ._Subdivision* $101 +50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* .300 Planning Unit Development * ,500 _Certificate of Compliance ! 70 _Design Review ; 25 'An escrow fee Is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness And accuracy of all forms and suppokting matenal submitted in connection with any application All supporting materiel (I e , photos, sketches, etc,) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stlllwate A site plan is required with applications. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 215 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project i-or 2,43.eua3, 1gt Assessors Parcel No3 a3D77,032003 7 siit rik*ca s-e,,.�.toorneei (GEO Cade) Zoning District. tb+P-t_. Description of Project Akeirovi L aAC_1 L t Ty -- $L,oe14-1 �S_C d.Gnl�,griPie_ 0194G41.4r r aimIurA•LruiLiA[G EA- "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submlftpd herewith In all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with file permit If 1t is granted and used." Property Owner t-Sk LrAta6 &i .oit 6 y Mailing Address 14oD tc o .r- City - State - Zip An LA. !..v regR r owN SSVt2. Telephone No (S 1-4t0 . -Q z,;e Signature Representative Melling Address City - State - Zi Telephone No Signature, p SbM (A_ -- / Zoo 14%.)050i' > o 141Lt0t g w __cazi $ Sl-"L3o-ciao SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) _ x Land Area La? 4 (1 Height of Buildings Stgrles Feel Principal 1 Accessory — Total Building floor area 131Z15' square feet Existing _ square feet Proposed 13,11.5 square feet Paved impervious Are�quare feet No of off-street parking spaces Soo SYNIE3O1.a O IWP Alb DRAWING TITLE DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NAME PGOOR PLAN Ilea MINE DRAWING SCALE COLUMN LINE GRID and NUMBERS NEA COLLT4L NUNBIER EXISTING COLUMN !UMBER SECTION TARGET VS I.O' SECTION NUMBER SHEET NIP•SER DETAIL TARGETS SECTION NUMBER SHOT N NS5SZ SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER ELEVATION TARGET SECTION NUMBER SHEET WEBER ROOM NAME and ROOM NUMBER 1 I ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER DPFlLe MR5T FLOOR FLOOR ELEVATION TARGET ta_1O0a FLOOR OR LEVEL C:21 REVfSION TARGET REVISION AREA CLOUDED EIJILDINb DATUM ELEVATION LOCATION! MAP STILLWA I1ER MARKETPLACE STII.LWATER, MN. 4155REV I TWIT I ONS CODE DATA A AN ARBOR e0. AEA AODA! AL AYOR4TICAL AIO NR cAOITIL Id6 ACT AG044TVJL TILL A64 ADJOTABLE NO Aeo s r a4eO FLOOR A66 moieesAR ALT ALTGRMTG ALIA ALJ04.6. N1 MGM PALEN1110 APPROAAPAO mTe ClIVIA NLJI MIET CEL1nAMJ Aare AOTONAM wdAeGveRhse Avs BD BOAR • 00.0,4 BEAT =ON= Rev YVE-.10 ARIL eac60661 1396. M^ ^NO e4 nem/ N or 6Orr4M eRs BPAReo Roc No= B6MT BAYIS.I+r BS ROM SAon 650 GUT = TIOCNL GAB GAR1er GAP GAFMITY ca4 GEarr Gat rruw4 G6 CORNEA 6009 O.AM LNAAPBI OWN LRALKB 045 CAR ARC C6 GL •" CLN CM= GIRLUSEm+2 CONTROL .OAT LNLKIINO1 CORER WC GOLAN. GLOM Gt0AILA11CO Co GLGAMST GGa COOT.GRDD COL COLNM CONE COPdNATlOR COMP GONFO=5D9100D LONG. CO -RCM CO. GOI.NO.= EOM. c Nec,oN C06 Go6561TJGTIOI GORY COMMAS OR COORGOawCTOW CORK CORRDOR COT CARPOOL= C6 *RELEA e&MT 6.1 GA6ppr G =PA0016TLE PI CLEIG P GO OOr co vie BRIG /ACTS) CM GOLD PAID* ▪ DaIM DIY GCOt$lm AR- COPA5 DPe DCsw am DEER DBPAm•OR Orr =AIL VP OR1. 4D FOLNTAIM 71A ORA•!1ER MAO OAOOLAL Co. DOCSKN DtlP 00PE.1ER Av DNDON ON OWN DR 000R O S 00165PCOr MO DREAMED GAIT GAL EACH GAP 00. 00.AL60R 00.E 5. =VATI01 5L5L EEGT6IG(MJ NOV EEVATOR OAR a496606Y ERN 061051. m. GBAAL *FF BON TIONT INT 4TDVATE Btl 514TRIG rwm GO0.ER Ga EP019 GN IJo_ EIS cosmic. GA OPAA504. GAIT GXTNLOR 10 rLOOR ORAN riT4 PBAOATOI re rim EITNONSOt PET. Mac C%T•16061C1 LAMM. P15 IYWSt9 POOR d`YASCO MG PIRG MOM GAOIGT PR FINSt'6) M.E. PI.GGLie MIL MAJ4M1 FM NOONAN FLUOR 19.10RIIi2Rr !'1t PRAYED) (0.61 Pr POO7IRT) PTO POLTIMO PIA MLR= MOOD MIT MANE PVL rim VALVE &Maar 6w 6A4G6MOG 6ALV 6ALV.46im 6O OEVgVL CO6RACTLOa 60 IMAM CAMARO 6R 5*005RED) al 6.4546LAZER TP DOMPE M BOARD b TC Ira MOT NJ( Rabe BON RGL.r.6 GORE MLAADN. 5R30 WAD NARDIONE 1GNOLNAL 1t4 ROLL.L6 METAL moo 10117.0M64. RF MemP 00 MR ROM M NE64T MO R5AT)6 MAC RGATE6A VERLLATCW LPL NOT RATER POD 5DRA14.IL O MOO AMNIA N 0S.IL4 6cL RULED). MD/ 6I'O EPDRMAAILM DOLL SCUMS= ECM ▪ W1vNOR JAIL ..Rn0R Jr .1NDr KOROC G,R 00414 R L L LOOM LAN L.ASORA CRY LAM LAMUN11:10) LA LATERAV. LAN/ LAVATORY LB 101*4D) LM LOT HMO LIB L MART LEI L.GAR LL LIVE LOAD L. LOS PORT LT L1M LTD UDDER LTL Lllaa. VR LONER N ... .LTA Ream LOT N COMaUCT POIN-L NOT 10 YA46 OA O ERAL1 CC GN CO.IEN01 OD M I5O= 0AUCRE4 OP COY= aM OVEN5AO Ono OPETOM OPI OMPOdT5 OZ A "MAW& •!O PARTICLE E BOARD PO PRWA3T CONGRne P EP PERFORATED) P ERM PEDMGTEt FL MATG P L PROPERTY LEG P LAT. n.AST4 LAMINATE M.AO PLASTER PLOT PUMMEL MP MOOS rex imam roar PML PANEL PO- P1 PR AIR PRSAB NRTABOGATCD) PRES PRVSG6G "RCM 5D.BLr10N PSP MUDS PER SWAM rear ►51 PC005 PER OBUJR 6610 PT PADRE)) FIN PAPER BC. 0I2PE10Ot pm ARMOR PT% PAPER TOSS INCEPTOR PVC PGLV6ITL BSA06 PL A) PLTMGaD 0 Or MARRY TILE Orr CRYOF1V R • RADO RAP RAWO RCP *001 1 raL116 FLAK R ROOF DRAIN REV RGVi91Pt45VLYID, RELP RZCZYTACLE REP L0 RDPIm99. RTERR LIVE REM. REMOTER REM ICOM'ORGBO) 61D) 044 ▪ R oroso OMIW 0 506(4 O RM. Revo RPM ROAR 045646 WIG RD ROAR oreulD 5 O 60VM SAM SAATARY *BED SCMMIL.E ED SOAP=PEBA '.SET SECTION eP &BURL FONTOBES S4L &Nets BIr sear SM SD4LAR 5T0 SAw5A0T NN4N OGME4OI DM 6AMTARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE E1BO Sr0CN1CAno4 66 IOVrm CD S1N'LG95 NOEL STD O NO.VPJ STL 0Rc 6TOt RT0LA0& 5n3.GT5TR41N1G 6RY6TAAL BOP A166*40 5E5Fe0Ea T v S'N, VAPOR GRILSE VD VINYL BAY VET 'RYL COAPGOm4N TILL' WO• O RETINUE K VDT/L. 11 0 vrRG V5T.L PAU. GOAEM4 rc • ADM N RIM A) MOOD MOM MOON AV AMOR. A• PMIEPRa0PN6 PVT MGILRRM PORT rD A:K.R PM' M3uDm Pert MARL Y Too YARD TR. YEAR BUILDING CLASSIFICATION TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FIRE SPRINKLERS ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA5 UBG 5043 ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASE EXIT REQUIREMENTS EXITS PROVIDED PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURE-5 REQUIRED TRAVEL DIST ALLOWED FIRE SEPFRATION MIXED (52 5 FI AND M) tIN YES 13115 SQUARE FEET (TOTAL) DROP 52 6494 50. PTJ 16K 0514 5RO.P FI 2146 50. FT/ Cbe 711 6R0.P E 2356 52 FT/ mC .14563 61ZJ0P M 214E6 111121C. 170916 TOTAL 10646 COFFLGS TRIPLE (X3) = 36,000 5F PER 1991 MG 5053 12,000/200.60 OCCUPANTS _ - EXITS REQUIRED PER 1991 Ui3G PER TABLE 10-A 100422 NO 4 - RETAIL 100422 NO2 - SEWING ROOM 4 TOTAL EXITS PROVIDED I WC PER SEX 4 LAV PER SEX I INC PER SEX 4 - LAV PER SEX I URINAL MOP 8 Or1HGE 6R110. M 1CTAIL 5ALE5 6WIOP 51 MINN R0014 6RWP a SALMI RETAIL TOTAL 1316 52. FT 2366 50. FT/ -GO 2141 50. FT/ •00 2146 50 Fr/ 2000 64345GL PT/5WO 25085/ 2 1255124 INCLUDES WATER COOLER 250 PER 1991 USG 100623 (SPRINKLED) ffig a TOM 92 TO B 52 TOR M TOR 52 TOM 11T00 52 TO 14 XPERA11014 REGVNED 11O NO NO NO NO 11.41'Y 517Oh9 9042 531n 3 NO 143 10135 1.014 12266 ISSUE RECORD 2 10-50. 0 I Or PION OOGLt4Ci8 NO TOAFM I 10-0-00 Kt3_0051 GOh4EN15 TOAI-AT . IS5 JE DATE QV D-^5CR PTION SHEET NO A REV mIS SHEET PROJECT DIRECTORY ARCHITECT THE AROI,ITEL/URA- hETYIORK 198I 6REE EY 5"R33 SOUTH STILLWATER . MN. 55082 PH (851)430-0606 FAX (651.4450-0810 PROJECT PRINCIPLE MICHA . 6 HOEFLER AIA PROJECT MANAGER JiMT HDEPFL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES K*4 LISON COMPANY 1200 W050N BLVD SUITE 320 OAKDALE, MN 55128 PRR (650730-0100 FAX (650130-0303 CONTACT CHAD BOULtY STRUCTURAL 5451NIERIN6 LARSON ENGINEE21N6 OF MINOESOTA 3524 LABORS ROAD MIHITC BEAR LAKE, NO, 55110 PH (850481,1120 FAX '651)481-4201 CONTACT AWN 6TRLUC DRAWING INDEX TO A51 A511 Al All A2 A3 A31 A32 A4 A5 A6 A7 TITLE SHEET ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL SITE DETAILS FLOOR PLAN/ INTERIOR DETAILS ENLARGED PLANS AND WALL TYPES EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WALL SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS WALL SECTIONS SCHEDULES INTERIOR ELEVATIONS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ROOF PLAN 50 STRUCTURAL NOTES 51 FOUNDATION PLAN 52 ROOF FRAMING PLAN 53 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 54 STRUCTURAL DETAILS MATERIAL. IND f C,AT I ONS l_d1_ ii Cti.rt�ti EARTH/COMPACT FILL SRAV2/FOROUS FILL CONCRETE SAND/MORTAR/PLASTER GOM4ON/FACE BRICK STOVE MARBLE i?i2tiitl?i >< STEEL / ALUMINUM FINISH WOOD PL". (DOD BATT OR SE}'0 RIGID INSULATION RI61D INSULATION ROUGH WOOD BL.00KIN6 / 5r1 M ARCHNET TEE AACEITIECNRAL NEIWORL D4G ARCHITECTURE PIAIMNG INTER OR 0SGN CONSTRUCTION 10064 LENT 1951 GREELEY 5Illt1 SOUTH GREELEY SQUARE SIILLWATER WI 55082 PHONE 651/4,30-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KELUSON CO ISL 50010500021312732011861231 >m MOM WAX SUCH 9AILL[ DMA TON32 Pr i 44062 OFFILS to Ram immommommimenEr Project HERITAGE EP SROIDE RT STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Project No 00-204 Drawn By J.*1 Checgea By MH Date 10130/00 Revisions Item Date I hereby urtdy 0. t 1N6 plan. peof! at6R or report was prepared try m or my direct esp4rn9an . . 1h - I am a duly Reg t red tmderF YW ;- ��/!',��� Sias orAft Sheet Title TITLE SHEET Sheet NJmoer TO 021363 The Arcs test Ed Network. Inc. 9 GWWT TO ALL FLAMER eoxes ROLE LINT OSITE PI -AN MI5 5F SPLASH E OCK 9 COOLET TO ALL RANTER eDi0E5 20,0. AO'C SPLASH BLOCK 00'-0 GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES AND INFORMATION L SE CML ORAR455 FOR TOP06RAPIFfi\L GRAD30 PRAM -NE AM MUTT PFCRATON 1 5E LAHO CAPE DRAA.R55 FOR ALL DC5726 AND FEN LA05CAPIRS DF01,04AT1ON 9 SL OEfDCRIOR R 66 FOR LDR5 ANTI LOCATION OFSTEDEPOLMOH M7RC 4 REMADE ENTIRE LOT Aa INOGAI® 03 Civil. DRAMAS PROVDE \FYI B13 AND BITMEHOa PRVAS PROVDE NEN PANG PARKAS LOT 5T121PIN6 A6 DOICATED ON 511E PLAN PATCH ALL 015T1. D AOdACBtT AREAS TO PATCH AHD/OR RE5RA02 AS REMAF® ALL AREa\9 BDIGLIED WTIF'90D' MALL BE PREPARED FOR PLnL@8R OF 900 SEE LAHOSCMR D IANNE& S CAITRAO OR t O11 NANNY AU. .W083ROVD arum' IOGA11 0 PRIOR TO LON9nl10TIDN 6 PROM EX15T 116 58MC8 LAB AYO RELATED TaLGT, tES EN ZDITER D 0103I5 EXCAVATION OF THE NE ACRE SOCH LINES AO STR. C11P8 HAVE am% LT090LIED PROVIDE 9ATAH.E 4.PPORI5. P DAAN5 D WAR RGH LI N 1 rIaICTLRE5 OR ARRANGE FOR TER. REPAR ANTIC PROPEFt AUOORI1Y T 5@ FLOOR FANS FOR EX51486 AIO PROPOSE FLOOR ELPVAT10N3 SITE FLAN E_EC.TRIGAL NOTES A PROVDE MO (7) 5665_ iAD POWUT 20' Th1 POLE ..6.IT5 54 PROVDE MO (2) 090 MTr DONUT 4ALLPACKS LOCATED PIM LI►84 SGEDIA.E. C PROVIDE THREE 0) 6ROfD NOIRn RXTLRES TO NAN NORM {ALL D PFG'VI'E 9' COMM AT DRIVEBARARCES 0 3CLIDECOWITm ALL FLAKIER 6 e PR. VIDE 9' COMET FPLM NORM PROPERTY Lae TO TIE D-MARK LOCATED Br DE SERVICE PANELS 9 401DAr TO ALL PLANTER EDAM 8-0 HI5.1 CHAN LINK FENCE MTH 6A1E AROU.D F RE ?vast PROVIDE P GUARDS a CORERS FOR PROTECTf0R ARCHNET THE ARCHITECTURAL NEIVORK, NC AROOTECILRE PLA.NNRC INIEROR DE5GN CWISIRI CRON MANAGEMENT 1961 GREELEY SIICtt SOUTH GREELEY SQUARE SNLWAIFR 10L 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KELLISON CO RAIL A4ID DEPOLAa7e A10 MMERIAM21 230® 8! EIZON BLVD. 91ED300 DILE ICI S10 PAZ ®'!a® €110901 Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARCETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Project No 00-294 Drown By Checkea By MH Date 10/3C/00 Revisions Item Date 1 her by esrtey that 1/18 plan, pemficaban or report woe prepared by me or under my direct eopervo on and at 1 am a duly Rea stared A ed ender the I.. of of YINNESOT VI1 It H• I►70EFLER Date 10/90. •14 • No M10 IMIRMENNNIMMEINEMEHHE Sheet Title ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Sheet NJmber AS1 02CnO Me Arch Le tural Net ork. Inc TO P r-0. 6 1 I II 1- e612 GPO&6IrT9i CAC. SLAB OR LANDSC JI•R:S-M6 WE PLAN BBU0NC19 PAYA6 O B612 CURB AND GUTTER 9/4 1-0 NOTE. SEE CIVIL FOR PAVM6 COI6TRLG7I0N W1U41406 PAVOK CLA.$ 5 BA.E 7-1 11=1 I=1 I I=1 I I=1 1 --C MFACTED N3 AR5 OBLOCK NOT USED O O BITUMINOUS PAVING DETAIL I -I C SYMBOL DETAIL 1 V2 r-0r TOOLED [ENROL .(NT PROVIDE V? RADP15 0 3000 SW ! s cone SI.Ae N 44.4 6a6A010 Pev1- .4 SEE PLAN FOR LOG REM' HMI l I I —III —• I 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 IJ I ACTED DRANLAR 1111111-Ti I I-11_11l 11 11- 1� AS RELa O SIDEWALK CONTROL JOINT 1 VT 1-0. • No SCALE I/2 1-0 6 DIA STL PIPE BOLLARD -P&L SOUP N COG (PAINT) LI DIA ccrv0. PT& STL PIPE BOLLARD DETAIL 1-0 IC 1-L OPARKING SIGNAGE A <Po4.. E PARKAS 5.611EE N »GTE LETTERS 6 6RAPtoC5 ON ell.E BACK416W'O TO LOWLY PV *LAMER IBM Cf a! STATE WLDIND.CODE VAN ACLE5310E St6N AT VAN AGCL9 SPACM TIP PA SPACE 2 VT PIA. STL PPE EMIR) TV 5n CAP PLNSN WE TOP TO. PORED CCM. POOTINS ARCHNET THE AR♦iUIECIUBAL NETWORK INC ARCF61EC1URE WANKING INTERIOR DES= CONSIRIICIION NANICINENt 1961 GREELEY STREET SOUTH GFEE EY MARE SNJ.IIAIER, YN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/4.30-0180 KELLLSON CO IIAL man LefamieIt QD Coaterml Oa Wan VOA ME OLc MIL WW1 1 z 01-ID4101 WEI l n04171 Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MIARCETPL4CE STILLWATER MBLL Project No 00-2cI4 Drawn By Checked By t IH Dote 10/30/00 Revisions Item Dote I heresy MA,/ that We plan. spaditcallon or report eas prepared by me or unbar my threat supervision •- - that I m doly Ragutered tool ;mbar the of .,•. at YINNESOT 1.4 0E 8R Date 10/ ^ -og No. 24210 Sheet Title ARCHITECTURAL SITE DETAILS Sheet Number AS1.1 5/4 1-0* 02000 The Arcnllectred Net oak, Inc Ar T R s 6.5 5 3 6 5 I � I 1i �i qii !i ii ii /`i 1 ,1 ii ii ii i, FO FOAM ED SEALS rr, rrirt‘‘,44‘v FOR AMLE SIZE �w`' e TIC ECI APAON 11111 034 Itt%ftft4,itry mamas `i I e I oTRASH 104 PRE BOLLARDS AS ODICATED PAN. SEE STASU GUMP RAIL AS MOAN® CAST N PLACE CO/CRETE Fr TO MATCH O41 PRE BOLLARDS AS 4DICATED PAIR See 0A611 1- b'.0 MIN OWN UIY. FBCE W GATE AR U4D FIRE RISER. PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARD AT COWERS FOR PRODICT10N DARK FIRE FUSER 6AS METER T LINFO08t 4 C06. SLAB PIBH CONTROL JOINT a G'-0' OL EA MY 14AX DASHED UIE INDICATES LITE OP OVER/CAD DOOR ABOVE TTP l SLPPLES STORAGE tOi MAO91® PROVIDE RIBBER PADS EBPATN EAG1 Main FOR VIBRATION r ISOLATION OP EACH LIST VERIFY LOCATION MVTN OMF.R 26T 1' ULB -4 5 Q 1 38AAT90 nor a TINED I UTE BR11Lb GLAZING N ANODI>ffi FRAMN6 6L. TO PANT PRAMT6 TO MATd11 GM 4 - i DRYER OALET 6L. TO PROVIDE I INSTALL LIVORY Te 75-0' METAL SNIP LADDER FOR ROOF ACCESS I I'6D.ATED MOM E7 TINTED UTE BROAte 6LADDS N AM:ALM j FRAMING 6L.TTOMPAINT FRAM S TO MATCH 04.11.1 DASfi0 L.OE 1LmI0ATE5 LUC OP BREAD ABOVE 0 4Ti 12-0 6B4ERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES A PROVIDE DIME 13U 6162IID MOLTT PiX1LRES TO M511 NORM TR` B FRONDS AN, OCTAL VC (2) 6@E AL OUIT O TLETS AAD 0ME CO DATA curter AT THE 134MARK IOCATIO. O BATTR0066 TO MUM 16P1 RECEPTACLE, MRRS OP FGIh-T FM 4 MOP LI6NOL6 (ELECTROWO EALLA5D AND SATOt D PROVIDE RECEPTACLE,. AND FICAR 0ATA SORES PER LODRAL ORS LAYOUT NO TO 1GLIIDE RECEPTACLES AT THE eR:AKRIXM FCR A COFFEE WRIER MD REFRIGERATOR NC A RECEPTACLE N re GCE AREA FOR A COPY MALNVE. E TO NCJIAE TNT P0Re16 IF AL1. RTUS LIFT /CATENA FM STROM AND ICRR MA -Et HEATER. WAG WOE DETECTORS. PRV AT BATHROOM. RIDS IST64ATED AT Ole b TON NV ONE 625 Mk P AIOTOCELL ON AND TDGCLOCIG OP FOR 'ITT TIC 51616 MDT EV DIMS Alm TIE 0(1eWOR LSNTDIS 6 TePU6.OBK NO FOYER. N TNo GRAM AT TIE EAST MALL FOR 516NACT GM BALDING MID T212 dooms AT'FE MET FALL POR 6NA6E ON Tie BAD216 26-0 TT 0 a I IIALATED (1.OM ET '37E0 UTE BRONZE GLAZING N MCDIZED PRAMS AL1 .ATE 9 5L. TO PANT FRAM S TV MATCH GM R ET A m yr ARCHNET TNR ARCIIIECIVRAL NE7W0RL1. INC ARCNOECRIRE RANTING. LNIE100R DESIGN CONSIRl1000V YAMMNEM 1961 CR"ELEY MEET 5001 CR EY S004RE SIILLWAIR IW 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FA% 651/430-0180 KKELLISON CO B4L ETES De0BO1®R MS 00eRLCfnI ®'® 00 MOM IVD. ILIA OLE 01181E 51 PAI 10911108 0B1ZH Mk13941:0 Project I4ERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Project No 00-214 imemmimmi Drawn By ,1.94 Checked By MN Date 10130/00 Revisions Item Date 1 hereby certify that thla pion. spool -cohort or report era prepared by m or under my direct aupenhl and 1 em o d Regulated Arehl d under the of MINNESOTA /1 _ Sheet T tie MOOR PLAN. Sheet Numoer OFLOOR PLAN I/8 I.O' Al 02C00 The Ara tecterel Net ark Inc • • • Na'alWWiPileaWiiW6PAPi0P I!AWiTiPi AWL TYPO 1 9 SW PETAL D NN 5/6 TYPE '%' 6YP BD EDFL502e 9 A WTT 615 ATION O MALL TYPE 5 516E 1.17AL 51305 M NN 9/6 TYPE 7e 6YP 90 EAO15f0EAND PIEE16LA55 BAT 019LITIOH POLY VAPOR BARRIER TO 6 ABOVE FINE119) OLd6 3 PM. TYPE 9 19/6" METAL 517105 YOU 5/1Y TYPE 'x' 6TP m AW PEEl6LA 5 GATT 56LLATIOM 1 POLY VAPOR 9AW6ER TO DECK ABOVE IT-0E ARP MP) IgLL ME 4 9 5/5. META. 5105 Petty 5/EF TYPE %' 6TP BO EAU MO TO DECK IT-0' APP NJPJ 5563IICILT533330 L USE MOISTURE RSISTIVE 61P MO AND RM. DEPTH SCUM BATT P6JLATIDN. TOILET ROWS. ].PROVIDE MOISTLRE RESISTIVE 6TP BD BBelp ALL PL1691H6 FIXTIMI5 APO O.T 9.PROVIDE BLOLKI96 FOR ALL TOILET ROOM 4LGE560R16E GRAB BANS. TOILET PARTRIWIS Alp LI6111016 4 PROVIDE RBHt6LA56 BATT 50J0 FOLATON 15RIR PARTITION MALL AT PLEICTER Of BOTH TOLET ROWB OPARTITION TYPES 4 NOTES 3/4 et HD' O ENLARGED ENTRY PLAN V4.1-0 00 9 4 v 4- 9.4 TPD T-10' ART PJID TPD T-Id � ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN V4.1-0 ARCHNET 19E A%IirlE AURAL TIEIWOM INC ARCIOIECTURE RAM NO INIExaR DESIGN CONSTRLCTION YANAGENENT 1961 MERIT STREET SOUTH GREELEY SQUARE STILLWATER MN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 051/430-0160 KELLISON CO MAL MOM IMMOMM1r No m.TOLTII! WAN DM HUMOR WADI SEMI >n OM DNA IB18i MX11916301 ORTME6ID09 Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Project No 00-214 Drawn By J.W Checked By MH Date 10/30/00 Revisions Item Date 1OAO/oo 1 hereby a rtry that the+ plan. epee Seaton or report as prepared by me under my direct supervision nd that I Om a duly R greened Are ect under the t State of MINNESOTA Sheet Title ENLARGED PLANS Sheet Number A1.1 92000 The Mci-tectud Net ark Inc PRRfMC/® YET_ GROIN 6L TO PROVIDE NO INSTALL DOCK SEALS RIND 8.1613t5 ATOP 01 Cal MALL 6706 9616LE SCORE B7WUFD BA10 B COURSES/ ES/ e 706 511104.E SCORE BUR`aS E0 BLOCK SATO C lar6)O V7176 ROOC FADE ON RA0m10goo 0 10'-0'700-0' I/E9LATED PRE- F003432 OVHaEAD DOOR COLOR TO MATCH 0 41 O �RUC>P OVER FLa'6 \EJF5. SYSTEM W I REVEALS 0 STOLE SILL INA - EFlS 515TEM0 TOP OF PER EL I.1-4 TOP OP MALL UST M PLACE CONCRETE -- PAW TO MATCH ON O eLp f U OF OPOLL 116-0 6'% 16 ROCK FACE O4 R IN6 WOO +LAST FLO R 100-0' 1O7Aiw 1 6 1 1 1 vai IRASI DCLAgFE 67t l6 POCK FACE C141 RWON45 BRAD 0 10-0 542-0 I101LATED PRE FDCSrED OVERHEAD DOOR CQtR TO MATGM cm 0 .usau«v. uuw. i 1 rlI 11 1 T r' 1 r,1 r t rr _ r 1( 1 1 r.1 I r r I •aie\slllrl�r" SOP OMa MALL 1e-0' 6 % 16 ROCK FACE CMR RU016B000— J)FAST Ft00t 100,0' 1 / I 1 d 1 tasserwilt PRE-FERS® per_ room 0171 O eLTER2iPat 07a6 MOLE WORE Elaaf27 BLOCK AT INS f1EVAT101/ IS TO BE 44 KT9UTATE THE BOr4OM COMES ES OCCUR FROM 101-4 r0 GRAD[ STEP AS RPA TE520 6706 SINGLE SCORE ELITHISiED BOCK BARD COI SMO 68AATE2 (tan E7 TINTED LT1E Mae! 6LA.1'teS N AN001 nu FRN010 O _TERNATC 60 TO PAINT FRAKHO TO MATCH CHU A 0 EL 116-0 TOP OP PIER S EL IBA' 6% 16 ROCK FACE CM1 Aware acre O 2 1t 4 LLISTOtE IOWA' 5TOh2 0 FIRST fiOCR FL CC -0' - 6706 56160E SAKE ELRYIS-EO BLOCK BAND L2 CO -REM 0 OEXTERIOR ELEVATION / 12d2 SLLPPM NON RAN LEADER — T 4-• T 1 I 1 7 ._SJL1 '•-1-•-I1 i t r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r l l r r 1 1 I I I i T T", -r r r r 1 1 LL 1. ?rlt:aPlH Ft( plll��o-lR(M1��tfY(H�,I�r�-�,I11Et(�al� t TOP CIF PIER TIRO- 63-4 rr 1-L— T L-- L-.- , rrr •- __ L' rLL J L_-_L_I .1 r� rT T r- I F8AATO (10n E) TNTED LITE 910QE 6LAZ I6 eV MOORING FRAMING 0 AL'9t'NTE 6 C TO PAINT PRAMON6 TO MATCH CKh el 0 IEXO SINELE 5COPE BUaaS(® BLOCK AT THIS F�VAT1021S TO B_ 44 ALTERNATE TIE BOTr0M GaR S OCCLR FROM 101-4 TO 6RAOe STEP AS P OOED° 1 1.1 , T 1 1 If . T L I L L 1 ITN r 4 1- .i) ililtlll!#* J l T -T1 1-1 I I .l T- r t 1 1 I.I.L._.rCt 1_1.r1,1_1,.L yiT e 11T1_J__— 11 ri I/8 1-0 FlC-FW}® METAL GROIN( (TTP.I TOP OP CMI MALL EL 116-0' ALTERNATE 67C6 EARLS SCOL asee5N® BARD 0.R B G.05)5e 7 ALTERNATE 6706 SNGLE SCORE EgSW (2 COMM g FINISHED FLOOR - EL 100-0 ...--- 6 % 16 ROCK FACE CAI RAMS OEXTERIOR ELEVATION mom iiI 1111111111111100"— V8 1-0 ROOF 04MN TOP OF MALL EL IID-0' PPE-410 100 INSTAL CROW O GIPS 5T5T97 WV 1 R`ve.k.e I] 1 65WATE0 M1OR E') RFLra, - - &LAZI I6 eV AN001ZV6 FLAMING _T52A1E 6L TO PAINT FRANKS TO NATOR CAI el 2 x LlE5TOrE ACCENT STOW 0 FIRST FLOOR 6 100-0 OEXTERIOR ELEVATION 6C TO PROVIDE 1 ?STA_ NAARO RAIL AS 11E011a'D va 1-0 GIPS EATEN W I REVEALS PRE-Po8JE7 MET_ CPOIW Ob TOP OP rtes- Y EL 1.6-0 \ � _ SIL IF_ 6'A08 5M:ORe BLKM51BLOCK EMIO B OQlaasIOT ALTERNATE 6Lso0SE0 6 ' 4 BANG (2 =R`E5) FRET FLOCK 04.0 EL 100-0' TR % 6 ROCK PAC6 7<'100L4.PAC 6 E CN R le6.15 BOND 0 POMP COTL0ETE rlA U. PAW TO WATCH EXTERIOR ELEVATION ARCHNET THE ARCHITECTURAL NETWORK TM ARCHITECTURE PLANNING. 641ERIOR DEc1.'V CONSTRUCTION MMUCEIIENT 1961 G.Ef9£' STR1T SOUTi1 GREBE SCIA, MUTER UN 5.C62 PHONE 651/4JA-0606 FAX 651/430-1780 KELLISON CO ILL area C19@IaRT APO aTa®I®/ Gam® mo 111109214 Bva aDID 24 WI DUE AIN S a Fa BMI4.® CMS Saab Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Prole..t NO OO-2°4 imommimmism Drawn ay .IH Checkea By 11H Date 10/30 00 Rev sicrs Item Date I hereby cerldy that this plan. spearcat.0n or report was prepared by 01 or ;Ie.:047T sagen a o a• o *Wy Registered MIits Wof M A � Dal 1. 301:1• NI 11 4210 e 2 Sheet - le EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Sheet NLmoer A2 Ve 1-0 (02 :2 The .Icn lectLral t(e1 or., h • • TUP or MALL ARMS 064' 11141 7DP F LP LOP 1000" ROOF LAP COSTRICTQ1 FP:3795HW METAL FCCP LAP 1 C OPN G26T W CLIPS EPDM Pe JtAAE 9A54 LP 1 OVER GAP 24 TReM 5L0P32 MOO % XIJI6 Rua* ca6TwJLnat 614AVEL BALLAST setXE PLY lE IER/IE 4 RID 65LLATICN 5/4 PFRLTIE I I/7 METAL DFLK BAR J015T SEE STRC11JRAL 6L TO SACK POCKET W CONCRETE APR A MUM EUSOS D ELaCK s *MATES Esm115432 BLOCK AND 540051 PACE AL' SCULE O EXTEROR YW1 O ROCK PALE CONCRETE P44504 RY 2 PART FORM FELLATION 61 COL'A.ES OF COMMIE MA SONZYO _MACE 4 LONG. SLAB W 6.6.10/10 MGM ON LOP 6RAV.LAR FILL 1/2' EJPN610/ JO60 EXTERIOR NY 1 _crgismrlrJJ_ 1P4'81 ? RLSO I6III.AT1a PstIMETER OVER 0' CONE 141629Y SEE STRICT PLR REP 121Q4 CONCRETE F00166 W MBAR SEE STRGTLRN. DRF6 � TYPICAL WALL. SECTION SCALE. 5/4 1-0' STOP OP HALL 66-0' J06T EAR66 AR1E5 (16-4' i11'-0') P16Da41EA0 weer 110'-0' nir`M21 FETAL RDLFar, 4ST W CJPS FLASH IP 1 SLPED 1tic9 9.OLK66 4 r }bNrra4 of Mtwat aim. ems. ID6o /aT'TOM OP Slow io4' TOP OP FLOOR TOO'-O' �6V2 RLnaJ LLAST i.e' e 4 RISIO 06LnTION 5/4 PFALPE: 1 5? `ETA- DECK BAR..VST SEE STRGTW/ . oTaP OF WALL 116,0' 12IST LEARNS 6 L TO SALK POCKET W APES (I04 -IIT-0 cave,. AFTER rea.A EXTERIOR WN 1 12 ROCK PACE CONCRETE MA.ORI' 2 PART Ft464 DE LAfl0/ 11 COPEES OF 60411 ETE MA504RY O 15/6 FETAL STIR 6 5/6 TYPE '6YP eo 5EPUNQ LINTEL SEE 5T16KTURAL DRAMS ALCM RA5a6 moon A440712ED NJ1N14 STOREFRONT MTN 1 INSLIATED 6&ATR16 Tow e') TYPE Lne BRONZE TI MD Q -PROV0e A 1534.M SILL exTa6ION AT SILL LOCATION 1 SEALANT 4 BACKER ROD Al ARa6D FRAMES A, TE AIM f1601rATE5 BE665N D ma* AIO 51,001)4 PACE ALTERNATE O SU. PlA511916 6.C. TO PROVIDE 1 INSTALL P-LAM 56J. AT 40100 + 15.223 4 CLPL. SLAB W 6.6-0/10 E6W al ROMP 6RAM.LAR PILL V2 0PAYSIC N JOINT KNi004 MNl1 rr.+4TRernrRN R1A'1 OWALL SECTION 2' R16I0 QO3LAn0N PERIMETER OVER Q' Cone. MASOARY SEE STRICT FOR REP 12 K24 CONCRETE FOOTING PV REB AR 5L STRG'VW. OR'6 WALE, 5/4 1-0' JTaP OP Rt0EAL 8_ 11445 70P or mem- IU'-4 +TOP OP REVEAL II0'-0' iPrraM oP 5T048 106-0 10TTO4 a' STOIe 1014' *TOP OF FLOOR I00-0' PREF514432 cAP, o exam L016T IV CLIPS EPDM !BERME FLASH LP 1 OVERLAP 2K TREATED SLEW moo 64.06a6 R0OP LOI6TR cTION SRAVEL 6AL1A5T 5u6LE1LY NSCPAE 4 RI6m 661LATION 5/4 PERLYIE 1 1/J' FETAL PERK BAR ,06T SEE STEW-LEAL 6L TO SANK POCKET YV CONCRETE AFTER 66NLBNTIO N EMBER HALL Lo16TRULnoN (ABONCEj 2 RIPS. O 851.1256 FELTS 1 MESH 6 LW 2 PART FORM NSLATION IV 60.R.E5 OP CONCRETE MAS2CY 1 Sib METAL STJD sir TYPEx6YP0D SiEPLWO ? THICK STOIC 60 DITER CR14411 La6'Rxn5F1EF1+J. 1? ROCK PACE c0Ncrrt1E MASONRY L 2 PART Paw INSULATION IN GORSES OF COGEF MASONRY 1 SIB FETAL 51ID 5/6 TYPE 7L 6YP ED PLAN &LT6MT6 *INDICATE!, BANNED 13OLK NO 910054 me ALTERNATE O 2 TICK STONE 4 r4L. SLAYS W6.610110 PM ON COW 6RANLAR FILL v7 DON610N JOINT OWALL SECTION 7 RAID IMP,4ATION PERMEIE R OVER D arc MA60hRY SIM STRICT FOR REP 12104 C CAOT! r9OT66 W REBAR SEE STRGTLRAL OR.6 SCALE 5/4 1-0 (VG? CP POLL .1715T BEARING �VARId 6I6'-4 -1T42 bTaP OF REVEAL n4-6 TOP LC REVEAL �EL III-4' 4/001 MEAD recta IIa-O' M14- 4 la 6orron OF 14.41101. PORE IO6'-0' �90TTOM OF STONE Ia-4' hTOP OF FLOOR IOO-0' 2 1- 5 3/4 mterres.so pun. ROer CAP 4 0 OROMN COMET W CLP5 EPDM 45413RANE P.AS4 IP 4 OVER CAP 2K TREATED SLOPED MOOD BLOOMS Roof La6TRGnoN 60AVa BALLAST Sdi61.E PLY i4aset.Are 4 4I622 66LLAT10N 5/4 PERJTE 11/Y METAL DECK BAR .015T SEE 51RIIDn5AL 6L TO SANK p lT LCPC ETE AFTER MCA erretort HALL conserznon L.earE) ? EJF5. O BALDING FELTS 1 FE511 D 04.1 2 PARR FOR4 DEL AVOW IN ra.R.ES OF LOMLREre 1446299 1 5/0 FETAL STUD 516 TYPE 'K GYP eo SEE PLAN 0 LINTEL SEE STRICT AIIAL DRANN6 Aux FL ASINM6 moon AMODI2» ALI49A4 STOR594041 MTh 04 16 9L.A.TED SLAMS nLn E TYPE we BRONZE TIDED -PROVIDE Auw1w SILL AT SILL LOCATION 4 SEALANT 1 BALKER Rao ALL ARcun PRA.FE5 6114121LA15 a1RN9® HOUR MIN 514O01N PALE ALTERNATE O 5LL 19.ASHJ6 6L TO PROVIDE 1 WALL FRAM SILL AT UNDO) O _BM 4 COL SLAB W 6.6-060 MOM ON OOP 661A414-09F5L I/P EXPANSION JOINT OWALL SECTION exrati0R 1W1 La6Trt1L,-0N 03A5L'1 2 R061D 1Ne.IL4n0N PE RPCTER OVER 0 LONG MASONRY SEE STREET FOR REP 12134 CO'LRET! FOOTW6 W REBAR SEE 51RGTLRAL VMS SCALE, 5/4 I -0 ARCHNET THE ARCIIMECR JRAL METWORKD)C ARCHITECTURE PANNING INTERIOR DESIGN COMM5T01CTION NAY4GE5E5T 1961 OREM STREET SOUTH GREELEY SQUARE SI6.LNAIOR RN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430 0180 KELLISON CO ERCE 6w6a'®a Alm RnamLTVM a>® DMOM N637RSITS eRaL[MEMNSSI PAZ e-0265 60 81-212a Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MILL Project No OO-204 sumemilimme Drown By AT Checked By MH Dote I0/9I/00 Revlslons Item Date 1 Mw.ey e.rury that Chu plan. .Reef o r u d r.po.t ra {lnparad or by m 0 Nu my direct supervbk that I am a d y RagbrWttot under the I• ` aT `4 tale d �NN�T rt�_,1 NI N 1i 44 D.10 10 ' T.' -'g Na 24210 Sheet Title WALL SECTIONS Sheet Number A3 02000 111E Nu,tectara Network, c • STOP OF FER IS 4' STJP CF YIALL IW-6 11C i2 52• MEAD Fe6Nr IiO . ^TOP W ARC loq-6 Agar1la4 OP MALL Joea e.ipBOTTO4 OP STONE a- Ion a BORoM OP STONE 014` TEr OP FLOOR 100'-0` me-s :AE0 FETAL ROW CAP 1 O CROFNtaET N CLAPS EPDX MEFHRAtE FLASH LP 1 OVER CAP 24 TREATED SLOPED MOO FLOCKS* STOP — a- IOFPER TOp OF MAI 116-0 tTYr.�.O OMT MARN6 ARM OW -4' -irraJ ENTRY ROLE COASTRJGTIOB .�.R��R:ti���.CaGin�i�'�i'i4+YliSitflt'RY.�s'. x•tir+�+� w••w1K�JG'��'K4S�xf}�Z��iG��aV;iR:�� `e 411•11a�RJ•�1Os4I.MINI11•11���t�-����������� III GRAVEL BALLAST 626LE FLY MEMSRAIE R160 PLSJATON SLOFE AS REMAREDD 5/4.eans I W FETM DECK 0 BAR JOIST 10 CHAHEr STEEL Y OIL 152 METAL DECK r EJP.S 1 2 NY ROOF GAP COIEYGTDN P RBRNO D Pe'N. RCDPGK 1 O CROFN CORN N C.PS EPD11 MEMBRNe FLAsu LP 1 OVER CAP 2r TREATED MOPED MOO BL W ARC GAP 2 UPS. a 5.4 DEA 6 MD STUDS 5/4 SEATO* ROOF C42GTRUCTICK CRAWL BALLAST SN6LE PLY 18EWNe 4 R161D e191LAT1ON 9/4 FESCUE 152 METAL DECK BeR JOIST WE STR1C-LRAL 49/4 I 41/4 2 VENT AS REOIDRED ENTRY MALL COSTRUGTION 2 EJPS 5/6 SiCATMRb 4 1/2 MTD SUDS l6 or. 5/6 SEA11016 FJPSO 7 THIOC SLOE O6 24 ROCK FACE CONCRETE I0506RYO 51D97N S 4 COM SLAB RP 696-I0A0 MU ON COW 6RANJLAR FILL 1/2` EJPAHNO1 J061T • r— EPDC ME6ER4NE 990 FLASHING WORM GP I6 FRO4 TOP OP ROOF DcosiloR w11,fohi-,arm ? A4r4,41 12 2 !JPS EULDN6 TS 1 MLR sue 2 PART FORM 5&.ATION R/ C/IRvi W CONCRETE MASONRY 1 52 FETAL 511.0 VD TYPE JC 6TP ED SEE PLA'. U LNTa SE STRJLTUR41. DABS ALLK FLASNE8 MOON AACOI ED ALW.M 5 OR EPRONT MITI O I RELLATED 6LAMS (IDA E7 TTTE LATE BROK1E TTMEO 10J -PROVIDE ALLMIAM ni FJt}EI�OI AT SILL LOCATION 1 SEALANT 1 BACKER ROD ALL ARLi1D FRAMES 4 CONC. SLAB N 646-10/I0 IW7 ON COW 6RAML.4R F/ L V7 9PAJ61O11O6fr STOP W POOTOK 961.0' • F21=100. MNL COW118&12 N n3A4 2 1216117 P19LATION PERIME792 OYER C01G MASORY SEE STRLGT r{R REP 12504 C06C6RE roams N REBAR SE STRLCTUA. DR1Li OENTRY SECTION SCALE 5/4 I-0' p.sp rAR ru TAN.M3 1 RIND 1I@L.ATION PHUF£TBR OVE R G CONC FVSONRY 5EP STRRCT FOR PEP 17G4 C0IYCRET` FCOONS W ROAR 5e STRUCTURAL DR/15 ARCHNET THE ARCHRECfURAL NH1gTOR$ D C ARc5l1ECNRE PIAMJPJG INTERIOR 0E5WN coNSIRUL110N SIANAGEUENT 1961 GREELEY STREET SOUTH GREELEY SOLARE SNIWATER, 69 5.,082 PHONE 651/430-G646 FAX 6 1/430-0180 KELT MASON CO UAL Hugs 1:0418fm4 sNa 045LLCR11®® tm SIESO4 aoq DES 24 041 DRS T01 m Psi 04Dc118 80= AID® Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER IN. liMINNEMEN Project No 00-294 Drawn By AT Checked By MN Dote 10/30/00 Revisions Item Date 1 honey cnttly that this pkm. pacification or repent Ras prepared by me ar under my direct sup ',Amon and that 1 am 0 d ly Regmte ad Arcta under the I tat. at Y0INESOTA. MeninsiNIMIIMMINIMENIMIn Sheet Title ENTRY SECTIONS Sheet Number A3.1 682^OO The Nct Lenora Net crk. Inc 1t2P OP GUARD RAINS 1044. SPAR:RAIL A9=Mal PANT TO MATCH GNI — �ror OF MALL O'4 4TOP GP DRIVE4N AMA VARJS LAST-IN-PLNT CONCRETE 1MLL PAPIT TO MATCH CHi SE 5174,G1VRAL GRAMM:6 e11UMR1N sarce ff SLIVa DN69. 7OP or OOCA AREA ti VAR ES C' X 24 cONLRETE FT6. N R®AR STEP FOOTIN6 AS RECURS, SIM 5111IICT DRAM A 9 TOP OP FOOTw6 �B VARIES 11111111111111 _I=11111111 I111 -111E111E111-111 •- - IIIIIII-111-1 El I 1-Ill-111-Ill ' EI I I-11 I -I _ _ _1-111-111 II-1 I -I _� ,11-III-1 1I1-III-11-III-� 1-111E-11 - _ 11 111E111-1II� -III-III 1-111-Ill-I _I -Ill 11-1 1- 4 4T,.T GP HALL wNo• 4 CONCRETE M.Aa ON COMPACT 6PANLAR FL - eV U • EXPANSION JOINT TOP OF R.00R O• ROCK FACE CONCRETE M SO'R'/ LAP O D ROCXFACECCALRETE MA501RY O 2 9TOAE SILL ES ELEVAT1016 O A-sERNAFE OO1GAMS 910.15107 BLOCK AND SMOOTil FACE ALTI311NTE 1 % 24 CONCRETE STI CT N R<$4 NCR STRIL'TUiAL ARCHNET THE ABCFff1EClJRAL NETWORK Die ARCHITECTURE F,ANNAC. NTER10R DcSIGN COSSfRUCTRRI LMebl(1]IENT 961 OREIIEY SRET SOUTH GREE EY SOUAR. SNIMTER, UN 5-082 PHONE 651/430-0606 A% 651/430-01E0 KF.LLTSON CO sea I;taisINNEILINENT A+ooIEE6311 1m MEECH L V. RUB m D L DNA VII EU &MEW ITpyiCE &'ZOOS Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MILL Project No 00 244 Drawn By AT Checked By MN Date 10/30/00 Revisions lterr Date I hereby car* that this plan. epeclflWmn or report woe prepared by me or under my direct perrlsm and that I am duly Reg stared _ " et Reeler th . tote MINNESOTA u ri G OE LER oats ton D -raj No 24210 Sheet Title WALL SECTIONS Sheet NJriber O CAST IN PLACE WALL SECTION SCALE. 3/4 1-0' O TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE. S/4 1-0 A3.2 r7 COD in Archnect oh Net ork Inc EL HO 913ETAL MAW- PRIM 4 PAINT 7M El 140.IG41METAL FRAME- PROM 1 PAINT OFRAME TYPES 121 DEEMED A2LL011 MET PAWT DO. PAR EXTERIOR STOREFRONT 4 ENTRANCE WASS LS 417E INZOOE TINTED LOI '2' &WS RSV EL PLAN 9JC✓ D BIRCH STAIN. 4 VARESI m 2 TYP ROOD FRAME POW 4 PAW V4 1-0 EL B4.CAD RAN SLICED BIRCH STAIN 1 VAR64 ODOOR TYPES D4 WALLI I META. IV VJ' TEMP DUES PAINT r 0�BLATED 1101224 METAL IV VJ' TETP 6LA95 PAW 10-0' r 060AT® OVER VEAD 6ARASE DOOR PRffiNEMED V4 I-O' LATER OVER IEAD 6.634.65E DOOR PR6R85I® DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR SIZE DOOR TYPE RAT INS FRAME TYPE HDYL 6RDLP COM1,gHT5 100 6-0SrT-0' D6 AJM 9 NOM= 5TOREFR01T Ill 51DE L1IE 1 TRAK04 101 7) 5'-044T-0' D4 F2 6 101A 1219-0110' 0 F2 9 102 3-0'T-0 0 F 2 IN- 13 WAWA METAL 7001 102A 0-01.17-0' C6 I 20 LATE7 OVERIEAD DOOR 1020 10-0Y0-0' Di I OELA'ED OV911EAD DOOR 103 3.O'T-0' D5 F2 6 103A 5-041-0' 03 Pi 1 10E8 4.0 "-0' D2 P3 I SLIME COOTS 104 3-0'0-0' 02 P2 4 I04A 3-010-0 DI PI 2 DI LATa2 42L101h1:TAL PRAMS 105 6-011*-0' F2 105A 5-017-0' 0 R 2 SQAATED 10.LON MTAL FRAME 106 3-014T-0' Ca P2 4 106A 5-01T-0' CO P2 4 101 3-01T-0 172 1.2 5 105 3'-01T-0' D2 P2 5 1011 6011-0' 1 BY 1194 5FM. SIMER 6ENE' AL HARDWARE NOTES L ALL NARCTPRE TO MET AMICABLE HANIDICAIMED AND ADMREDEREPE OS 2 ALL CLOSURES ON FOOD DOORS TO ee TMN601.1E0 NTH 119t BOLTS. O2TNN COWERS APPROVAL CP ALL ICBMO S REGUIRMENIS 4. PROMOS LATCH 6Aim9 ON N.J. EXTEROR IIOL.OI MR. DOOR ALUM NM FRAME TYPES L APPROVED MAOFAGIIRERS KA DER OR AP.ROVED MAL 1 PROVIDE REI WORW96t B FRAMES AT ALL RINSE Aim GLOSLRE LOCATIONS 9 PROVIDE SEALANT A4040 ALL FRAE3BOW INTEROR AND EXTERIOR. 4 ALL HOOD 904E ATE TO BE M015TIRE RESISTANT AND PR_ TREATED VERPY IN PIELD ALL Fi 4 9 ROLt5N1 OPBA''1165 ANC. BRAE PETAL D44361016. 6 ALL ERAa: METAL TO MAITCN FRAM M651L 7 ALL D1115E4016 ARE TO ROAN C.80465 LNLP59 NOTED OTI HARDWARE SCHEDULE 4Pr8P ALL HARDFA4E BY DOOR SUPPLER NIL OR ROOD DDOW B8214 ARP 652 EWER KNEES 4t2SA .6 106ER TMTESPOL.0 (8ONTFJ EPP,VA 1-36 M184 4146ER PAT ER-STRPPIN6 150R4X 96 NADER SA S'S 6103A 40' WEER DRIP GAP 059PD 010 626 SC41.A6- came 1 54134.660E 1GCKJET )S$9P-3 (BY ALI004H DOOR SF LENT (EATERIOR PAW A -HAM DrnamcPJDD MTh LATChSET ND.= 41.1.1100 erns PER 0 k14""sLP OR WAVY DAY PIVOT SETS 2 CL051305MP NORTON CR-0900 I PILL T67DI A 04/24 843.-CL.7 AMDIGAP ACG05115LP BRONZE) 19:T WATER STRIPPN6 4140 5,133.5 2 PAT DEVICE (VON -CURD, 549.66E RODS) A 9327 K. 6411L 01EM AL.) B. 9571 L (L.VER LATCH/ L. 932T EO F.1)T ONLY) INTERIOR 5046LELATG.0T (NCTFLA®.) E01214 ,RP 6.2 NAILER KNEES 4134P 626 61.7104.106C-0N ABr04ATG FL OOIBOLTS µICE SAT 62b 506.6.E 6114WE; PA55A6E LATGEET IX OR 5 651.E PRIVACY LGCK9ET 8104i443NJ BEM, ITV HA613l .0455E 3LP-1e0 10R-0i CLO`8t AL409 SAT 626 501.66E GRADE 2 PRIVACY LATCIE#T macaw PARLATAEET PG)4LAsa) 88.7R NRP 4ARDER EWES I SET AUTO FLEN 1 SOL'S W.TN4 J0116ON Pb1 OR F -8 I EA. 0.61PROO 51I4E 6 YIN .I214E04 CP-2 2 EA. G.0EET6 WREN 1600 1 EA COORDNATOR SAYAN 20144501 COR 2 EA DOOR STOPS PER 5PW 1 EA ASTRASAL BY DOOR MAMMA IIRER 1 EhLATOEET &AWES AD A 5 MGDE3'WAVY DV111 MOM IN108OR PAIR LOGK:ET Sic+-Lw 6J BBTP ARP NA69t IEi6E9 I SET AIRO FUER ECUS 6LYNN .1216014 Fat Ot F13-0 I EA RUSTPROOF 611/IC OLYN4 JOMBON DP-2 1 EA 3OORD3ATOR 6LY164 J24601COR NTN PILLER AND BRA4JSTS 2 EA DOOR STOP. Pat SPEC I EA -OCKEET (50L469 WANT OVIY Oaoo= IRMA MENTOR 506LE LLXXSET 0404LA154.) 0B1279 NPP 14461311466M CLP-16OI NORTOI.LOWR N.405 SAT 626 5GLA6E 6R412E2. PRIVACY LJL7QECT ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE ROOM NO ROOM NAME WALLS FLOOR CEILING COMMENTS MAIL FIN MAIL FIN BASE FIN HT 100 SAL� Ift-T101 6/6PAINT COG GT T C TCARPaT PAINT OPEN OPEN R SEE FLOOR AN (AU FOR DETAILS � P6 6 PANT COG CPT GP1 PAW CPD4 lea 5.,.„,E "WCI WM COL SEAL WPM PAW 0194 103 %%J)UY 5P6 PANT CONG. CPT CPT doe PNhT 8- ' 104 BREAK ROOM 5e6 PART COW VGT VIM PAW OPEN ICS O.FGE eREA 616. PAR COG CPT CPT PAW OPEN 106 ART ROOM 6F6. PARR LONG CPT CPT PAW CP54 101 PEN REST ROOM 6r6 CT/ PAW COWG T CT ErN3 P 8 -0 SEC SHEET A6 FOR DETAILS 10b REST6r6ROOM. P AINT COW G T CT PST 6 -0 SEE °0@1 A6 FOR DETAILS 109 TRASH FLOCK SEAL CO4G S J1L PARR OM Im ewer64 COW CO CPT CPT p wr 6-0 111 CLOSET 6118. PAW COIL CPT CPT re 6-0 KEY TO FINISHES - INTERIOR MATERIAL DESCRIFTION FINISH COMMENTS VWYL BAY O ARMSTROW C0.0R INRF6RATE0 AALL BASE OSLO% TBD ROOMS. SEE PLANS WY FIELD COLOR O A4MaT6ON6 RPE3061 TEX1161E STAHDA✓a EXCBLN COLOR TBD 9I. 12 X12 XVb ROOMS. SEE RA•6 P LAM FILED COLOR OCOLOR NL504 ART INTERNATIONAL TBD WATER TOPS ROOM 5M 1.1.4\5 CT P03D COLOR O KATEYD111E IPT JSA COLOR TBD 92C 12 X 12 X 546 TOILET ROOMS, SEE PL455 CONCRETE SEALER O ROOtS SEE PLANS PART CARET COOL TBD RO0M5 SEE RA)6 PANT O EEN.IL 944E WORE PAWS AWE' 461 ROO 5 SEE PVJS KEY TO FINISHES - EXTERIOR MATERIAL DESCRIPTION FINISH COMMENTS ROCK FACE CALL O ANCMOR BLOCK COLOR BRICK RED S ZE 6 X 16 RAg016 BOO SINSLE MOM 9J0404E7 mock O ANCMOR BLOCK COLOR. DARK GRAY SIZE D X 16 974612 SCORE RANOO 80140 DECORATIVE MA oKRY Oq. e 4.34TO1E CO OLENT GRAY R 2604E Rem 5TAGKED ECM AND 50L0Hi C011900 A ADOF FRAME O KANIEER CAT e. 94 X039 COLOR, TYPE FLROP011 ANODIaD ALD95.61 CGPU16 O M FR 6OLOR KLAD MDR TO MATCH ROCK PACE ON O CANLPY AND PARAPET EIF5- ORTV1T O TIE WTI CO DRYVIT COLOR L16W GRAY TEXTLFE. TBD AT CCAAOPY LOCATORS SLAMS O MPR VIRACON TYPE LOPE FOAMS, TNT LITE 83120E ARCHNET THE ARCFIIlECmR1L NETWORK, RTC ARCNITECNRE FLAMING. INTERIOR DESIGN CONSTRUCTOR YANAOER4NNT 1961 GREElEY STREET SOUTH GREE EY SQUARE SRLLWATER MN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KELI iSON CO DEL BUM L81W01@C uo 0241711.1¢01150121 III) RlE1 RFD. RUB 2R OM DAM RN 217 IOS 0132032 t>Dp3 0670MT Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERT STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER P'N. Project No 00-294 Drawn By AT Checked By MN Dote 10130/00 Revisions Item Da e 1 h ruby why that US plan. peafcotion ar report •aa prepared by m or uncle my direct eReatslered pastelan and that 1 o duly under e I!!-r• VS. (ate of LIINNESO IIIc A Dal 10/30 LE' Na. 24210 Sheet Title SCHEDULES IMINOMENNIMINMENIIIIMINNIMINE Sheet Number C) DOOR TYPES V4 1-0 A4 0 000 The Arch ect al N t rk Inc • • • 114 mac 46en rie11� A ODAAG Fig 32 Clear Floor 3 e at Lavatories '.I1? CIA 6. GRAB BARS 9 SEE SHEET 6/AS .1 FOR TTP MaMnN6 rELSIITS PIA N /NA/ Iii TPD IN.91j■•Ar o TOILET II //.. ,w\-il Y/ tiers. 6 CT 0 sst `e�1///// /veal ■/r!1N//////L M. m N 3/8 a 1-0 6YP ea Pr O 90' 46 MIRFER MAR COWER SEE %CET VAS FOR%41S ZgNI416 1E61PTD 501C4M1411SL GT BSB 6L. TO PROJICE NOD M6TA.- BRAG3l6 A9 REaA1RD (-1- TOILET ROOM ELEVATION WOMEN V4 1-0 (d Book Mole OADAAG Fig 23 6rob Barb at Water Closet 3/8 1-0' 9 m 9 SOAP DISPE]69t , 1 1 " 1 . P LAM CLOVER13 11 IV 9 II �Ii�-11 PAFHE TO18 Demean GYP BD PT O LROML P ILET P® M 1fl. TOILET ARRTIWL V7 Pk5rs GRAB BAR SEE SMMT 6/A5 FOR T1'P rourn IB 1e61TS TPD TOPJET 6 LT O9 6 CT BABEO 64. TO PROVIDE ARD INSTALL MALMO AS REGURED OTOILET ROOM ELEVATION HEN V4 1-0 Da fN ADAAG Fig 31 Lavatory Clearances BI L0 TYPE TO TO MAWR SPELPIGATI016 46G TO P1tP/IDE A1D INSTALL BPAGT66 AS REGLIFOW 61rm 3/8 1-0 611. ea PTO 90' 46 MIRROR PAAM COMER NENr.IGSPLA'!1 SEE SEET 6/A5 FORTYRTYP )•1q�7Q� 14106111319 SN4K4VINSUI- PIPMIb ---6 CT BASED II 'I I At' ' 64. TO PROVIDE ND R6TN.L BRAG7d AS REaARrD 6YP BD PT ® 101. DOOR E FRAME SEE FLANS IPPER 1 LOPER GABOET N ADJETABLE °%ELVES 1 1aRE PJJS 4 VINYL BASE O 6L. TO PROVLE AID a6TN- BPAC0a AS 16alRED OTOILET ROOM ELEVATION MIN V4 1-0 Ss/au Mtolrted defamer OADAAG Fig 2t (c) Toilet Paper Dispenser OWINDOW SILL 6L TO PpoVIDe AIm 06rALL saw N6 A9 PEOJRfD 3/8 1-0 BACXER ROD 1 SEALMT� WLROr1AVE 51E1P peao leoda y / / `104 or \ h 9 ! 4 m MICRO m �C� Rog P4.NGCBID / �6 WATER TOP,-.. N 4 BACK 9PASN S OBREAK ROOM V4 1-0 OADAAG Fig 28 Clear Floor Space at Water Gl000t6 3/8 1-0' 6L TO PRWIDE Mp 16TALL PirY1 ELL 4 EiOCKM6 REOIWED SCALE 3 1-0 lU WINDOW HEAD SCALE 3 1-0 ARCHNET THE ARCHOECTLRE PIAAN31C. WIETOR CUM CONStRUCION 11M00EYENT 961 GREFLEEY STREET SOUTH CFEIIF( SWAB S13IRATER, 11N 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KET T NON CO ®1L EI= ®1Hatmer AND III616CIa1 69009 TED IRJBa1 KM. 8018 9l OK 011H MN SEE RIX gi-IDOS 0101:11 5.763/ Project (HERITAGE E1BROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Pro ect No OO-2a4 imumumennilimimum Drawn By AT Checked By MFI Date 10/30/00 Revisions Item Dote 1 hereby caddy (hat the po epearwatbn or revert en prepared by m or under my ducat penman nd that I ern a day Repel. ed Itect under •, I• of ;' - tot of IC' l' 0 Date 10/ '.0 H0 ea No 24210 Sheet The INTERIOR ELEVATIONS Sheet Number OSHIP LADDER SCALE V4 ar-c' A5 0 000 The Arch test al Net ark In O6 REFLECTS, CEILING PLAN SYMBOL LEGEND O6 RS'SATE3 CE1d66 IE1614r API' LOW BAY METAL NAUDE 6G4 MAP SUPACE MOM II0KAlE3 NEFPCT FLUCREC01T LISLE FORMES u6Nr TO TEE MINTED a 14O' APP VERIFY 4E1614T rV OVER F�� <-^ 1. 5R ATES 6YP BD CGS BREAK ROOM l e4 1 40404 TO DESK &MET 11 I YP ED PT 6-0' APP MALL 1OP01 TO STILGIRE `+re `+ R4 MP V1P TL 6'O' APP r� Owr 6TP BD PT EL • -0' APP O6 MOMei 6r0 6'-0' APT. HEN 6hB • E.. APP 6 6 06 ART ID6 r' I I t 4 H MINS ROOM I etre; TO OL'OG N OPEN TO DEOG I- 1 �i CS rt aB \,/ RAJ_ PACKS CUTOFF TYPE r GUM FAN QG RECESS LAII L16NE INMATES GRAIN KM RJUORPLBR U61R FI%NRES Ln! TO BE W.NffD a 14-0' APP VEEP toms' IN OrMEIt �4t W :l' r "ems E INDICATES E1GI5T345 TO REMAIN OR OPEN TO ABOVE GENERAL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN NOTES 1 GOORDNATE IAY0R OF ELEC'wUt RKRRES NTH M6CNKGAL AND APLKT4SNG.V. DRANNOS 2. GOGRD NATE LAYOUT OF IECHAILLAL PKTIRE5 nTH E1L1RIGAL Alm ARC4T: RAL ORANN65 3 VERIPr THE DEPTH OP ALL MECHANICAL AND ELEGTWUL FIXTIALE5 ATM LEI1216 SPATE 4 ALL 04010 CEE.26 LNRBS TO BE PANTED 1E61E S VEFUPW COMM ALL Ll6MTIN6 AND EhER60.LY U ME. FQTN DAMNS LODE OFPLIAL Ale FRE GENERAL ELECTRICAL PLAN NOTES A PROVDE MO CU 5 N4LE ICAO DONUT 20' TALI PO12 LI61113 B. PROVIDE MO (2) 250 MATT 12041.1T WA .PACKS LOOA1E57 PER LIMN SCIWLE G. PROVIDE TF10 0) 50 r4ATT M 420 FIXTJFLB AT TIE ENTRY CANOPY ..AL D PROVITE TWEE '516R0.20 make P4X'NIE5 TO TI/V& NORTH BALL E. FROJ1E 3 =cuss AT !ERNE ENTRANCES TO mom CONCUR TO ALL PLANTER Li04E5 F PTLUV4E3' GONDLTYFRGNNCR1T PROPERTE LJIE1O TEED -MAUL LOCATED BY TIE 5ERVIGEPAlELS. 6 PROVIDE LOW BAY Ili FIKRR4 FOR ROOM 100 NO ROOM 102 K PROVIDE N0REGT FLLIORCGBR FIXTLRE5 AT ROOK 10. L PROVIDE CMAN KKAAN FLIORE`.LI37T F110IR:5 AT RCD143 104 105 Am 106 J. PROVIDE 1e4 RITORE5LE TAEC:9EE7 MITES AT R0014 KN. K. PROVIDE ND INSTALL. TWO (2) 60ERAL DRY CURETS Ale ONE NO DATA CUTLET AT 154E D-MARK LOCATION L BARROOM TO NCLLOE 1 6P RFCEPTACL- r4R1I6 OF 00VWT PAt 4 MAP LKN5316(HILTROML BAUA6T) Ale5WT0L M. PROVIDE RCSJB"ACLE5. AND R.OA/DATA BO)E6 PER CONTRACTORS LAYO/T AND TO MG.WE R.G0TACES AT TIE BREAKRGOM FORA COFFEE MAKER Ale REFFOSE tAT0t AND A RECEPTACLE M TFE OFFICE AREA FORA LOPE MACE@ K TO RGJOe THE ARNE. IF A.LRN5 LNT HEATERS, FIFE STROBE AND Noah 'N1021ENTHC INK. SPOKE DETECTORS PRV AT BARROOM RIDS EST:MATTD AT OE 10 TON Am ONE 625 TON 0 PHOTOCELL ON AND TPECLOGK OFF PLR TIE TAD 516N5 ON TIE MIDDLE. AND TIE 0TT0UOR L16N1116 P PROVIDE Pram mums FA6 AS 30IGA1PJ ON ThE 9.A S. O. FROVI0E AN ALTERNATE PLACE FOR 1 10' OP TRACK LINNET 6 2 20 OF TRACK L16XT11,4 AND 3 40 OF TRACK LL6HRN6 R. PRW17E ALTERNATE FOR ORE TO CORD DROP IODATED AT TIE OFPC2 AREA 5. TOP u6.4438 AND POKER T WC GROATS AT Tie EAST WALL FOR 516W16E ON BAD N6 MD 170 CIRQUES AT TIE ACTT WALL FOR 316NA6B Oh RC EMLD316 H O6 O6 OO O6 / O O O O 6 6 6 6 O REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE Va I'-O OFP Cr AREA 105 I OPEN TO OCK TLRALL SALES OPEN TO DECK itio ARCHNET THE ARO6ITWTURAL NSW= RAC ARCHITECTURE PURN.NG INTERIOR DE5X1N CONSTRUCTION YMLIGENE IT 1961 GREELEY STREET SOUTH GREELEY SQUARE SOLLWAIER ITN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 ITLLISON CO Emil was L6TRL16m7f IND O7BIEK ssi sown TO =DIRT BLVD. R®174 q4[ DLL$ ICU 1® MX ®Mam MRS ORTDmi Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE BTILLWATER MPL Project No 00-294 minammino Drown By AT Checkeo By MH Date 10// Revisions Item Date 1 hereby certify that thus pie epedReotn ar report was prepared by me o and my direct eupervlla., and that 1 am a duly Registered under the la of .* State of YWNESOT YIC 0 OEFLER Dote 10! ' ' No 24210 Sheet Ttle REFLECTED CEILING PLAN Sheet Number A6 m2'VO The Architect re Net oft Inc I I I I tWI 1 L 1 I I I © TA 1tIIIIIII III M II IIIIIIIIIIII - 146ERAAE RIIIiIIIIII` ItB T IO ZN SUPPER ILE rn • `IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII RAS5gp6t ri7Hrrn MTWEE ROOF SYSTEM EA/ER R16D LL CLASS A RATR6• LATION (-P6) %1 TAPERED NLATION / MP/ SLOPE 4 PER FOOT TAPS RStATICN AS REWIRED I I I I GENERAL ROOF P-AN NOTES L VERIFY AND COCTONAT° ALL ROOF PIDETRATO/B NTH AEC ANGAL MD 13EL1RjGAL DRAIRR55 1 MECAWIIGA- CGMRAGTOR TO PROVIDE ALL ROMP O ZIA5 AID YEW PIPE PECTRATION PTJSI146. 5 ALL ROOF' SLOPES TO EE M4 PER FOOT 14/04)4 MUMS NO'® OD6+N•f 4 FOX PADIT ALL 6ALVANZED MOMS, EAIA6T 1-00D51 01GT5, ETG. TO HATCH ROOF EAJ..ST S SEE 5n6CYRA. DRAr00166 FOB STEE 51ffi ELEVATIONS STD DESK DOID BEAM RENT-0 M DOr85, WARS, ETC 6 ALL MOD LLL00/4 TO 6E EXT�1CTt MO STFE TREATED AND FIRE TREATED T WAVERS TO BE PRE FIRMED METAL TO MATCH WPM Mr r IDa2 SOPBNTH RAN LEADDER TYP ThREE/ S6ED I i II AnTIaON APIISrtHYP{A• SLOPE 1/4 FOOT 5 - 1$43/A/E ROM / I SYSTEM OVER RIM INSUAn=N R 2B) IL CLAM ARATML SLOPE 1/4 PER FOOT TAPERED PSAATON A6 MODR D TTP rt / Ii SL.010 V4 PER FOOT // TA RE[�JIp� T RELLATION - ROOF DRAIN PPM6 DAYL16/O TO 6REEH AREA SLOPE V4 PER FOOT' TAPER`D RELATOR 1 A5 ITE2AF D TYP 1 I I i:OPPTIFt OV6t PL60 13 TYPJ I I I ROOF PLAN 1 SGAL2, ue 1-O I I I 1' ■ 6' OVER ELMS Sc0PEit (3 TYPJ ID' 6' OYER Fton 50RP0L (S TYP) DRAIN IN COLLfp SPILL GN GRADE RLN /EAT TAPE a MAIN i ARCHNET THE ARCH ThCIURAL NE111/D1$ WC. ARCHRECTLRE PLANING. PRET60R OESICN CONSTRLC1ON MANACEYENT 1961 OWLET 'TREET SOUTH MEELO' SQUARE STILLWATER MN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KELLITSON CO MI =MI DENEUMENT MD @OIILm1 EVEN ID1 IllIDXIN ELM SURE In al[ 0110 Lai= Eli LIDOS MICR 6ID001 Project NERITACTE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER I"tIL Project No 00-2414 Drawn By AT Checked By MH Date 10/31/00 Revisions Item Date 1 hereby caddy that Ou pi padReatTon or report • prepared by me or under my awed supeM ion and t 1 am a duly Rundea9Mrethe ed Are ctf State of aTral• IONNESOT MCA H0 L' Dote 10/30/ M No. 12 210 Sheet Titie ROOF PLAN Sheet Number A7 0 000 The Arclutect.,rel N t ork Inc 9 g API; g g 0 2 al py sy 45 V' v cl a`: m c 0< 0 m U ` L O W o 0 0 z 0 c C 0 N v 02C00 The Mch tectutci het or4 Inc 9i it t9s i§x If! 14010 1, gm§ git J121 1411140 ill iT11111111!Iiilililili dti J d p d d a J d 2 O 9 III h : 121 I: 11 g Ri t ig dr -g g; h P r gg 4g k pi to ' o 100 ai:01 !IIR 1 11415 11 1/ vi 014; : i54/ heirAlinIMItiaMill41 d J d - d. ! - 011 2' x01 lim 124- 1 45 ad g ) !.41 1;11!ii gil tl a tl s d 1?8 m R�kydjR+ °4 € mi � OP li yyi r : I°; Ili 1 9 6 i' N L o 1/ 01 Xg �` it gq a6 d PI 1 i i 11 :1 ;PI /1' iN:q ;<bg P 4 to,tm mP 1 1114 ig Al; � 3 ong � } b i 11 �O . 1i a d 9A90 Ala PO Pm�g 1 <5 PI ;®°� Mill 0 gi ¢ 09 OhR 9 $ham ¢� L40 ,ig 2 lion l4. or � < IV 041 MO I -e Y6p.ai 0 WIT 1 'in ,oi Mci n F F i �9irg nir 5§ig !R� eirih � ,0;p<igk � Ibgl x °� g m iliitygi l�'INI�4vogh LAW 9 Aga Iffii` �'�a iS Ot is 22< Os 4 d d .. d i d. .e - y tl tl 46 d • A 4 0, d tl 6 .. 9 d kkikk ig RR a' AL RtEns ig Y pi 11 I 1 4113M ffl 1! i .i o • • • A a • G) 5 VELT TO 546 PLATE 6R01./r 9a.1n 7.0'1d2 FT6 nt2.)S LOW TFr6 E1..•46-0 (2) 5 veer TO 846 RATE MAR =JD _ __ J �_r 55 VERT • 46 OL Td'T6 E.m46-0 5 (-r 5TEe FT6 5EE DETAIL I/53 1 . Pny/ID GANG. MALL Wof ems a 16 OL. EA. NAY 6 ELOGG MALL rV 5 VERT •45 2 -0 .12 T6 MR2) 5 cow TFT6 EL.46-0' T 6 _ B-4 5.5 4 6 3.5 (9 136 7-0'MT FT6 APT6 El.46-0 TA=TE. EL.Wi-B 4 GONG. 51.A8 eV 6$6 EO.4$624 PPP 046 GLTIPMTED 6RAlL AR PILL ON 6 MIL POLY VAP0L BAWER T/1A8 EL 103-0 (2) 5 VERT TO 15a6. PLAIS 6RAJT SOLID ---- I] et.rx 08.J. FY5 VERT •46 OL 7-05a2' PT6 1V(2) 5 GAIT T/PT6. ELA6-0 I2' OLOCK MAD. TO EL 106-0' at BLOC POLL ABOVE 55500• 97 OL T/PTE. EL 46-6 1 ii it iii.•.. 7-0klt' PT6. will 5 00NT 4PT6 ELA6 (21 $VERT TO 346 PLATE 6R0R SOLID 12 MOCK MALL TO EL 106'-0' 4 B BLOCK MALL ABOVE 5 VERT • 97 OL --t A .5 O 03t2 ROM, I ) ow TTT6 Fi.46'-0 I 6 SLOG(rtAUL yE\\\ I I I � • I 92 OL. I 05'-0' I I 7-0' 27-O' OFOUNDATION PLAN SGAL.E1 I/8 1-0 a-0 26-0' 9914 •(‘I 9 a 9 a \ \ vino 19_.4647 FOOTING SCHEDJLE MARK SIZE a REINFORCIiv 19.0 9.043-05d2 PT6 M9)'5 -A MT F4D 4-0'44-0712 FT6 6/(4) a5 EA MY P43 F53 Fir 4E44-0417 FT6 M4) 5 EA. MY 5-0,b-6 d2 FTC. 1449) 5 EA MY 6446-0'oG FT6 W(6) .5 EA MY PILASTER SCHEDULE MARK 1 SIZE a REINFGRG NG 24%04 MASONRY Pr1A5TER PI mat) *6 mows TT5 os OL 16 alb 5460NRY PLASM M4)5 VERT a e3 nes• 10 0.. COLUMN SCHEDULE MARK DESRIPTION BASE =L ATE 0I T5 9+b I/4 12 7 PATE N(4) 9. 0 AAX4 9GLT5 G2 T5 4.4.5R6 I0'4lO ,6 4 ELATE 4v(4) 9/4 0 MOOR 90L15 NOTE, SE DETAIL 194 FOR GONTRIOL 30615M El0GK MALL CD -o ARCHNET 1005 ARCHIIECIlJBAL NETWORK. INC AXCKTECNR PUNNING INTEROR CESICN CONSTROCI'ON Y.V54GEUENT 1961 MELLY STi.•ET SOOM GREELEY SOLARE STILL9ATER MN 53682 NONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430 016C KELLTSON CO IDR =OP 2094564 A4O 026131E631 �ffi 7271 BLOM1r.VD. R®1A cot tam te19a FAX 6•'m0:6 OMB 69416® Larson Wow En of I6lnamta 3524 Lc0ore Rood Mule Bar Iota Orme** S5110 651-481 9120 Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Project No 00-244 Drawn By AT Checkea By AS Dote 10 3O-0O Re Isions Item Dote I her by a reify that this pis opecdcabon o report roe prepared by ma or under my direst sup Melo and that I am a duly Reg toned Engi . under th Ia.a or the State or MINNESOTA 11.1 uVo4 Dote 1 /30/00 R g No 62.4141 Sheet Tit e FOUNDATION PLAN MBIBMENNINNII Sneet Number S1 1:12000 T Arc rt.-Loci Net o k. 1 c I A O .11 reteel WAN Tb'L JIb-1 U2 94' BH 15 TYPE B-22 6A / 0r34W 5415' SEEDET 8/9FOR DEGC AE' ilNb PATI301 X W8e40 SEAM MI6s91 ,'PAN 59 SPULEI COW L9i3d/4 NW* ELE`1AE ANGOOPS e24 0!. GYP) 2'4 1/P T? , ni rep ><n h • COAT L9+ON4' YVIlJ'e aye& ANCNOR9 024 04 (TYP) vs KASE BEAM T/5 JB. EL I16'-4 ri L BEAM rw,O6 SEAM TS'LeJl6 9I/7 9 < TIN SPJcB ROOF HATCH 116+55 BEAM 9-0'BM O ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE. V8 1-0 rue.asieekm MTh NLYO' .19. 8..116'-4 40 O • can Ls41d/4' MM • FOIE 4049 . ITTP LINTEL SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION BEARING PLATE U A1606 /WN4ir PLATE WELDED TO ear -cm 7 erS5/8 P EA 30 M2) I/2`0e4 LA sun ?BOW TO BORON L2 018a1811N4YP PLATE /ELDED TO BOTTOM 1' 776/8 PL. EA. DO NW 1/2 0.4 L5 51LV9 MELDED TO BOTTOM L9 AtQD P4/1/4741 PLATE r8DEO TO BOTTOM 77779/8 PL EA ENO 144'2) I/2 01r4 L6 5T.05 mow TO B07014 4 E 00.12 BENT ?V25 8 ER611• E10 BEARING PLATE SCHEDULE NARK DESCRIPTION 13P1 lad° x3/4' PLATE AIM V2'0;4 L6 51109 YELPED TO BOTTOM BPI 1' b 414 PLATE / W I/2 0 4 L6 511.05 YELPED TO BOTTOM OS 1 1 d/4' PLATE M2) IQ 0:4 L6 51105 MELDED TO BOTTOM ARCHNET THE ARCIIIT CWRAL NE1WORl r INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNNG• INTERIOR DESIGN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1961 GREELEY STREET SOUTH GREELEY SOUARE SELLWAT"JN NN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KFT.TSON CO OAL IVOR m1'EGII10 ARO0261n1GW » tm HIZIXN NM. 51218 1R 01c Dl1& TB4 m P17<0-ID00 CRIB 1141198 5 Larson 1msan Engmeeny a) YameT6te 3524 lit= Road IRIIIe hear late, Ulmleaota 55110 651 481-9120 Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. P oject No OO-2q4 mencommismimmi Drawn By AT Checked By AS Date 10/30/00 Revisions I em Date I hereby certify that this plan pe0HToatan or report else prepared by me or der my direct sup Moan d that 1 am a d ly Registered Engm nder thy Iowa of the State of MINNESOTA ►itoV L in) Ja+L Dal 10-S00-00 Reg No WA') Sneet Title ROOF FRAMING SCHEDULE Sheet Number S2 02000 The N le lurol Net ort, I c • • • 4 117130 NObd7 313Z10N07 117ff1 3132d0N00 307101 NI 1970 4; 1I71301NIOf aOOZi 117130 1ZIOddf1S Z131N3 9 z 4 m 0 E m r 6 -0 -� m 117130 010019 17 1N310.1302:10NI3c! 117tn 17 r a b r E z v 0 E r 1 z 4 TIT F EH Bp O 0 1 _ff ilii .4 ... m i r. P/4 r _ ITUIP 104111 15111i! 2 n x15 �aownN 7aa45 CP T 0 o p0 O 10 .53 0 0 0 `O Nm o ey- a 11 0 0 g-g/ 2m • S • If1 CO' MAIL MT) PILASTER (SEErP[AR) ROCK eocesLock PLASIB2 (ABOVE BRAE SEE ARCM) COW. S.AB (SE PLAS) COMPACTED BRAN .AR FILL (se PLAN) PT6 519E PLAN FOR 62E a REIFORG S OCONSTRUCTION JIONT NO SCALE ralmmak-xl"TF6ro 8 ,may BADOSe PAPT3t cam W MORTAR CONTROL .DINTS 57EEL GOA141 sEE PLAN OCOLUMN PLAN DETAIL BASE PLATE COIL. euc 3/4.1 -0' I) MAX 8PAGN6 34-0' (SEE AIW A FOR SPAGLY) 2) MR PAGE BRICK OCTAL SET' ARCM. SPEC.. CAMARO F3M APC,0 P7OYDE 9/4 CLEAR RAC JOINT EA PALE FMB ARGt SPEC.) OSTEP FTG DETAIL 5/4 ILO' ARCHNET THB ARCEITIECTURAL NEISVOR$ RtC ARCHITECTURE PLANUNG INTEROR DE MI CONSTRUCTION WANKEdER 1961 GREELEY STREET SOOT GREELEY SQUARE STLWATER WN 55082 PHONE 651/430-0606 FAX 651/430-0180 KELLISON CO DAL OUTS DDRO 55a AND III61KETal EMS Tm RUDIGI BLVD. Sly CM AU8 IQi 19a VAX 4iVID473 ORIDIbm� 5 Larson Larson Esglneeiing of Minnesota 9524 Labors float White Beer Lake Ylnossota 65110 851 481 9120 Project HERITAGE EMBROIDERY STILLWATER MARKETPLACE STILLWATER MN. Project No 00-2cI4 Drawn By AT Checked By A5 Dote 10/30/00 Revisions Item Dote I hereby certify that this pan, ep. l faatfon r report ea prepared by me o under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Registered Engineer ander the laws et the State at MINNESOTA 1. � ,1�\) r� Date 111/3O/OO Reg No. 15241.7 Sheet Title STEJMURAL DETAILS Sheet Number S4 02000 Tne Arctulect ral Net rk, Inc • MEMO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Pnonty Trail Improvements Date November 9, 2000 On October 16, 2000, after Joint Planning Commission/Parks Board public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Trails Plan map and revised plan It would be useful to staff and the City Council if the Planning Commmssion would review the trail map and indicate pnonty trail improvements At meeting time, staff will review trails that have been mentioned as cntical to the system The Parks Board recommended pnonty trails at their meetmg of October 23, 2000 • • Integrating Land Use & Transportation continued from page 9 create pedestrian- and transit -friendly streets redevelop old shopping malls into mixed -use walkable town centers and encourage in -fill residential develop- ment communities of all sizes are begin- ning to consider transportation and land use as part of an interrelated system in which mobility and livability are in balance The importance of integrating land use and transportation cannot be over- stated Thinking more strategically about land use -transportation relationships can lead to reduced vehicle miles of travel improvements in air quality increased levels of walking bicycling and transit use economic and community revitaliza non and the preservation of neighbor hood character — not to mention a more visually appealing landscape Transportations role in creating liv- able communities requires balancing mobility — the movement between places — and accessibility — the ease with which desired activities can be reached from any particular location Good mobility provides the economic impetus neces- sary for growth and investment such as safe and convenient transportation facile nes or services linking residential and employment centers Highly accessible places offer a diversity of development with activities in close proximity and connected with multiple travel paths We want good mobility and accessi- I Gainesville/Alachua County Urban Form Concepts Westward Growth Concept -""-" - — l 1 Compact Area Concept - Radial Development Concept m�7si"1. ��-- .7�7 ca x ecovapr da Figure 1 Four land use scenarios were developed and evaluated for the Gainesville MTPOs 2020 Trans portatlon Plan This picture illustrates the concepts tested as part of selecting a preferred land use and transportation vision for the community bility to go together For this to happen communities need to carefully consider the intended function and purpose of their roadways and the impacts they will have This is no small task given the wide range of groups that have an interest in the transportation network THINKING STRATEGICALLY IN GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA When the Metropolitan Transporta- tion Planning Organization (MTPO) for the Gainesville Flonda Urbanized Area gathered in 1998 to set annual funding pnonties it faced a dilemma widen SW 20th Avenue a congested roadway con netting a dense concentration of off - campus student housing to t)' University of Florida (as called for in the existing long range plan) or address the congestion by promoting alternatives to the automobile and building an intercon nected system of narrower roads to help create an environment more supportive of walking and bicycling To help resolve the question the Town/Village Centers Concept - Transportation Project _ J AI 1J Wa _� l J i1v9 Jam. r !. � I L_%lam � .�� S. �`• 1 ._� /�'�. � \ L 7 , 1.1 a cr rm. -T Archer r 3 tat _t r am 1 /96 A Widening/new road N Narrow road to 2 la o Intermodal centers Busway �Y APExpress bus service-. ti N Bus service enhancements p, N New E W bus service ant c%f Feeder bus service !, - l _ Internal transit circulator system 4+ Park and ride bts awthorne Figure 2 Each land use alternative contained a unique set of transportation projects designed to sup port the intended future land development objectives The transportation system that would support the Town/Village Centeis concept is presented here MTPO sponsored a community plan ning charette The charette generated a vision centered on the concept of creat ing a walkable student village To imple ment this vision charette participants recommended keeping SW 20th Avenue at two through lanes building bicycle paths and wider sidewalks funding increased bus service interconnecting a series of smaller streets and installing roundabouts (a modern smaller -scale vanant of the traffic circle) at key inter- sections Stronger links between the res- 'dermal areas and a large (approximately one million square foot) nearby com mercial activity center were also recom- mended ) Facility Expectations & Guidelines The MTPO commissioners concurred with the charettes recommendations In a rapidly growing community with an urban area population of 190 000 and the states largest univer sity MTPO commissioners realized SW 20th Avenue was only one of many con troversial transportation projects they continued on page 12 Facility - Expectations & Guidelines Gamesvilles SW 20th Avenue charetteT, estabhshed facihty expectations centered - —_ on the concept of a "walkable student vi1= - lage These facility expectations include reduced traffic speeds wide sidewalks buffered from The roadway with shade trees bike lanes and buildings onented^ toward the street for -more convenient _ access to bus routes The next step will involve developing - operational and design guidehnes to sup- - port these expectations Enhanced" - - - - roadway cross sections will be prepared_: to convey the relationship of land uses to the roadway For example the cross sec- tions will show the setback and height of adjacent buildings and indicate the type - of pedestnan and transit treatments ` _ expected as well as landscaping and buffers Good illustrauons will be im portant in conveying to the pubhc what the guide hnes call for lessening any ambiguity The SW 20th Avenue area includes a densely developed off campus student housing area located just north of the sprawling Butler Plaza shopping complex in Southwest Gainesville Concerns about traffic congestion in the area originally, led to calls for major roadway expan lion projects until the charette focused on a series of interconnected collector roads and roundabouts at intersections to calm traffic as _ part of a "walkable student village" vision PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER �40 / FALL2000- 4 -▪ --- Performance - I Measures - One of the most cnucal steps of land use transportation uitegrauon is the establishment of performance mea sures to guide the selection of strategies w. As long as transportation decisions are, pnmanly based on compansons of traffic j volume -to road capacity or on measures js of travel speed along roads and delay at - intersections transportation and land use ` will always be addressed separately and rn relative isolation - - • Foc example many commumues 1 require adequateinfrastructure in place" concurrent with development approval The problem is not with this requirement ' but rather in how it is measured and - applied Most of these communities _ LL define adequate mfrastnrcture as available roadway capacity often in terms 'plan 1 acceptable level of service This type of ta i I measurement tends to promote roadway onented solutions such as adding turn ;, lanes which may not be supporuve of a s s desireto create a more pedestrian and ' transit fnendly environment The solution is to develop measuT res that effectively address progress toward _' _, T -' or away from the overall vision for an ' - area If a comdo is to emphasize mobil s ty then perhaps roadway level of service— - ~, and measures based o--2,n speed are appro --` prate However if accessibility and by ability -are -important (as they often will 1 be)�different measures must be used _� s - ▪ One example is the growing mterest 1 r in measures of"bicycle and pedestnan ;, 1 T level of service" - quantifying the walking r .,4' and bi `gin P e enence much the , J ' ciii- same way as the dnvui`rg expenence is cat_ 1 xM ri egozed m`the traditional roadway level „ „ i ,`of service Of course quite different van r abler are taken into account variables ._ i r, _ such as the width between the sidewalk; r,� s. - and roadway • the presence of an on pr ` --off "-tree[ bicycle path o`r lane the pres ,_% h _ ence and width`of a'sidewalk and posted -i traffic speed and average daily traffic vol 1 1 `= , ume ri the adjacent roadway [Note for, 41 - additional information on how Bicycle/ - {-n t Pedestnan Level of Service is being apphed - -L 1- in Gainesville and other areas contact £ o - ' Bruce Land& of Sprinkle Consulting, Inc '''' , at 813 949 7449 or blandis@scrworld.net) Integrating Land Use & Transportation continued from page 11 would face Emboldened by the out- come of the SW 20th Avenue process and recognizing the need to update the metropolitan areas long range trans- portation plan the commissioners decided to develop a strategic vision plan for transportation and land use This planning effort would examine alternative land use patterns and hous- ing options and consider transportation as a strategy for a new kind of invest- ment in community -building particu- larly in economically disadvantaged areas of the county Work on the Strategic Vision Long Range Transportation Plan for the Gainesville MTPO is nearing comple- tion Unlike traditional long-range transportation plans in which a fixed forecast of population and employment is developed and alternative transporta- tion system improvements are evaluat- ed the heart of the new plan is the development and evaluation of urban form alternatives Each of these alterna- tive development patterns rn order to be implemented would require a different set of transportation investments Before taking a look at the urban form alternatives however let me back up for a moment to touch on the start of the long range planning study In public workshops held throughout the county participants were asked to identify the top five issues or problems facing the regions transportation system Interest- ingly among all the workshops and responses from the public traffic conges- tion was a relatively minor complaint The worry many people have one workshop participant explained "is that Alachua County will if it continues on its pattern of growth one day resemble sprawling places like Broward County or Pinellas County rn South Florida - ugly congested polluted and high in cnme " The majonty of the comments related to unsafe streets for walking and bicycling a lack of street connectivity infrequent or nonexistent bus service and complaints about suburban sprawl limiting travel choices When you think about it these are fundamentally land use problems Addressing them requires a concerted land use -transportation strategy - not the tradiuonal method of develo a plan to widen roads because a 20- ar traffic projection says the road will become congested THE URBAN FORM ALTERNATIVES The urban form alternatives being evaluated in Gainesville represent differ- ent approaches to development Each is supported by a unique mix of trans- portation strategies with differing levels and characteristics of transit service bicycle and pedestrian pathways and roadway projects Figure 1 p 10 shows the four urban alternatives being consid- ered To briefly summarize each of the four 1 Westward Growth Concept - Would support the future growth and develop- ment of Gainesville and Alachua County through a regional transportation sys- tem that improves mobility and connec- tivity throughout Alachua County reduces automobile congestion and maintains a highway oriented to portation network within a primarily low density single family residential environment 2 Compact Area Concept - Would create a high quality walking bicycling and transit supportive environment with a focus on reinvestment in the tra ditional core area of Gainesville and the towns of Alachua County Reflects a greater mix of land uses and increased density of development Proposed trans- portation projects would include reduc- ing the number of travel lanes on certain roads to create a more pedestrian onent- ed environment enhancing bus service, developing on and off road trails and constructing a dedicated lane for transit vehicles 3 Town/Village Centers Concept - Would focus the regions transportation system on connecting a limited number of intensively developed mixed use cen- ters of activity located througho County and on maintaining the c c- ter of existing towns and neighborhood • • • FEATURE Integrating Land Use and Transportation years the transportation profession has emphasized mobility in the development of plans programs and projects This emphasis on mobility - moving people and goods conveniently and efficiently between places - has surely increased our societys productivity and economic wealth But it has also fostered the cre- ation of homogeneous and inaccessible places stnking in their lack of character comfort and vanety We tend to deal with mobility and liv- ability as separate often competing con- cepts The tools of the transportation planner are geared toward measuring and providing mobility While we have institutionalized measures of traffic con- gestion (volume -to capacity average travel speed and vehicle hours of delay) we have too often ignored measures of livability and community character - those factors that determine the quality of the places we are stnving to reach so quickly This article looks at the connec- tion between land use and transpor- tation - and how area Gainesville Florida has begun to rethink its ap- proach to trans- portation planning If All Your Tools are Hammers It has been said that if all your tools one metropolitan by Whit Blanton AICP This view of State Route 26 near the 175 intersection in Gainesville represents the familiar hind of road way development planners are increasingly seeking to avoid Accessibility The ease with which desired activities can be reached from any particular location by physical connections Mobihty The door to door expenence of traveling throughout an area or cor ndor measured in terms of travel time comfort convenience safety and cost Measures the ease with which mdivid uals can move about on vanous trans portation modes are hammers then everything begins to look like a nail Using traditional trans- portation measures based on travel speed and delay urban area transportation plans and corridor studies emphasize building new or wider roads or increas- ing the efficiency (read increasing speed) of existing roads They are Visine plans (not Vision plans) - as they seek to "get the red out" (red meaning severe (roads sidewalks buses etc) travel options and devel opment proximity The more activities available within a given travel time the better the accessibility Thus accessibility is a function of both land use patterns and the transportation system that serves them congestion on most transportation plan- ning maps) by using measures of speed to determine needs and project pnonues Such plans say nothing about the desired growth pattern or community character and only incidentally consider impacts on land use and the quality of the devel oped environment They rarely consider how transportation can support land use objectives to create highly accessible places with a true choice of travel opuons Too often quality of life or lrvabrli ty concerns are only considered as a reactionary response when neighbor hood groups protest a proposed trans portation project Until our planning processes for land use and transportation are more closely integrated we can expect more of the same PUTTING LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION IN BALANCE A growing number of communitie' are attempting to fundamentally change the process so that land use and trans portauon are better linked bnnging the concepts of mobility and livable commu nines into a single focus With efforts tc continued on page It - ----PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 Road Design continued from page 6 campus in East Lansing Many others are now being proposed Editors Note For more on the modern roundabout see "Round abouts What They Are & How They Work in PCJ #26 Another example of context sensitive design is the reconstruction of a twenty- three mile segment of U S Route 6 in the Brooklyn Connecticut area The state Department of Transportation first pro- posed the construction of a by-pass around the Brooklyn town center When this idea was rejected the state DOT next proposed widening and realigning the road through the town center This pro posal in turn generated considerable opposition on the part of town residents and officials in part because it would destroy portions of the town green an historic stone wall and several large trees Connecticut DOT officials agreed to take a fresh look at the entire project Meetings were held with town leaders local residents and state histonc preser- vation office staff to listen to their con Online Comment While incorporated clues and towns have their share of intense traf fic problems county governments have them too and solutions seem to be very cookie cutter in the typical Lets widen create more lanes and put a traffic light approach toward road improvements How do we get beyond these typical approaches? The states may have more involvement toward design but my atten Lion is always grabbed when I read solu uon based information along with methods for creating increased working dialogue between local governments and the state agencies (Regional and DOTs) that are charged with many of our highway improvements since communication is often the most difficult part of the process Certainly here in Citrus County we could start working more closely with everyone Involved to create more suitable road improvements — Larry Fury Community Development Man ager Citrus County Flonda cerns The end result the state DOT agreed to reduce the width of the paved shoulder in the town eliminate a pro posed passing lane and change the pro- posed alignment to save the town green histonc wall and large trees The revised design achieved the DOT project goals of reconstructing the road improving road- side drainage and upgrading the guard rails while also satisfying local concerns Unfortunately the flexibility shown by Connecticuts transportation depart ment is still the exception rather than the rule Many state highway departments continue to resist community requests for waivers or flexible application of AASHTO standards One big reason is a fear of legal liability if an accident occurs on a road not meeting AASHTO design guidelines According to the Boston -based Con servation Law Foundation this fear is unwarranted for two basic reasons First flaws in highway design" are usually considered within the scope of govern- mental immunity for planning and dis- cretionary functions While the law of governmental immunity vanes from state to state as a general rule a lawsuit against a highway department or public works office would succeed only if the design received no review was obviously inherently dangerous or was clearly made without adequate care Second the plaintiff who manages to overcome the presumption of govern- mental immunity must still prove the highway department was negligent Fail- ing to follow AASHTO guidelines does not itself constitute negligence — just as following the guidelines does not neces- sarily mean the highway department is not negligent The guidelines simply rep- resent general advice to be considered in the context of all the circumstances of a particular situation In fact Vermont s transportation agency has developed its own road design standards that are more flexible than AASHTO s The state s standards apply to all roads except those on the federal interstate highway system or part of the "National Highway System Like wise, the Oregon DOT has taken full L Resources: Take Back Your Streets How to Protect Communt L ties from {Asphalt and Traffic Conner- vauon Law Foundation -1998 - Limited supply available for $12 15 Call 617 350-0990 - ' - f 7-Getting it Right in the Right of Way 'Citizen Participation in Context - Sensitive Highway Design Scenic - Amenca 2000 Available for $5 00 Call 202-543 6200 , _ Flexibility in Highway Design - Federal Highway Adnunistration r _U 5 Department of Transportation [ Available free Call 301 577 0818 t" A State Highway Project in Your Town? Your Role and Rights A Pnmer. for Citizens and Public Officals Preservation Trust of Vermont 1995 Call 802 658-6647- advantage of flexibility within the Green Book when addressing design issues on the histonc Columbia River Highway In addition five other states — Connecti Kentucky Maryland Minnesota Utah — are working on a FHWA spon sored pilot project to develop context sensitive highway design standards The ultimate goal of context -sensitive design is to provide transportation facile ties that meet the needs of motorists while also addressing the concerns of the community that the road passes through At one time in our history we designed transportation facilities that were beauti ful as well as functional that met the needs of people as well as motor vehicles and that respected local communities That time may have come again • Edward McMahon is a land use planner attorney and director of The Con servation Funds "Amen can Greenways Program He is former president of Scenic America a nation al non profit organiza tion devoted to protecting Amencas scenic landscapes McMahons co appears regularly in the PCJ • Sketches were prepared from photographs of existing places in the community to Illustrate how the land use concepts might change the face of development in the Gainesville area This shows a pedestnan onented mixed use center adjacent to the University of Florida and a single family residential neighborhood villages Projects would include express bus service linking the region strategic road expansion projects and dedicated lanes for buses — which might eventually become a passenger rail corridor See Figure 2 p 11 4 Radial Development Concept — Would create a multi modal transporta- tion system serving highly developed mixed use centers located along major linear corndors linking outlying commu- nities with the Unn ersity of Florida cam- pus and downtown Gainesville — while preserving open space agricultural lands and lower -density residential areas located outside the corridors The emphasis of transportation projects would be on high -capacity bus and rail service into the University and down- town area As part of the planning process each urban form alternative was evaluated using both traditional and non-tradition- al methods For example traditional computer based travel models were used to assess each alternative s impact on regional travel patterns and on the effec- tiveness of transportation system strate- gies Along less traditional lines bicycle and pedestrian levels of service were con- sidered as well as regional and local accessibility transit service quality and the proximity of jobs to housing Performance Measures After considering the four urban form concepts the MTPO voted unani mously to adopt a hybnd that takes ele ments of the compact radial and town/village center alternatives and melds them into a long range land use/transportation plan for the urbanized area Called the Livable Community Reinvestment Plan it focuses on 1 re investing in the traditional core areas of Gainesville and the towns of Alachua County to develop walkable downtown centers 2 connecting a limited number of highly developed mixed -use centers and 3 providing a high level of premium transit service in the linear Archer Road comdor The Livable Community Reinvest- ment Plan also seeks to increase travel choices by developing better walking bicycling and transit environments maintain the character of existing towns neighborhoods and village centers and preserve agncultural lands natural areas and open space outside of highly devel- oped areas Since the city county Metropolitan Planning Organization is composed of all five elected Alachua County Commis- sioners and all five elected Gainesville City Commissioners the plan should have the strong potential to guide city and county land use policies and devel opment regulations SUMMING UP Properly integrating land use and transportation requires a clear vision and policy framework developed through active citizen participation Commu- nities must more broadly define the objectives of the transportation system and how its performance is measured We have to remove ourselves from the single minded notion that transportation plannings sole focus is on how to move the maximum number of cars with the minimum delay If this remains the focus transportation planning and land use planning will remain disconnected — with citizens wondenng why their com munitys development goals seem so hard to achieve • Whit Blanton AICP Is vice president of Renais sance Planning Group an Orlando Florida based policy analysis and trans portation planning consult ing firm which assisted the Gainesville Alachua Coun ty MTPO with its recent planning efforts He also serves as Chair of the American Planning Associations Transporta non Planning Division Blanton would be glad to answer any questions about the Gainesville Alachua County project he can be reached at wblanton@cittesthatworh com or at 407 893 8175 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT WORK Bringing the Plan to Life 44, • excitement that accompa- ny. s the adoption of a compre- hensive plan is very real Indeed, it is not uncommon for a planning com mission to celebrate once the plan has been officially adopted After all a quality comprehensive plan does not matenalize overnight A solid plan is the by-product of study analysis and reflection Accord ingly the decision to adopt a comprehen- sive plan generates a feeling of closure on the part of the planning commission as well as the community The adoption of a comprehensive plan however should not be viewed as an act of closure Instead the decision to adopt should be viewed as the initial step in the plan implementation process It is essential to remember that a com prehensive plan will not effectuate change if it is afforded trophy status and placed on the proverbial office shelf If a plan is going to make a difference in the life of a community it must be used and followed The balance of this column will highlight by Michael Chandler an eight step process a planning commis- sion can use to bnng the comprehensive plan to life Step One Involve the Public - and the Governing Body Management experts tell us that organizational change is less trau matic if the people affected by the change are involved in planning the change Because planning involves change it is crucial that the public be included not just in developing the plans goals and objectives but in focusing on how they will be implemented Members of the public must be challenged to see the con necnon between the dreaming phase of the planning process and the doing phase of plan implementation As I ve stressed in past columns it is also cntically important for the planning commission to keep the governing body informed and involved A plan simply cannot be implemented without the gov erning bodys continued strong support Step Two Convey a Message Our plans must convey a message the public will connect with Products sell because peo- Online Comments: A comprehensive plan is a bud get and like any budget must be reviewed and altered as needed The final step in any com prehensive plan must be a schedule for routine penodtc review and tnggers for review neces sitated by non routine economic events — Neill F McDonald MAI Member Savannah Chatham County Metropolitan Planning Com mission Savannah Georgia "A good concise article I especially liked the timeline idea — to be sure to get things done As an example our old master plan is being redone In it are items that sull haven t been accomplished because no one ever read it (except me and a handful of others) Its amusing to see some of these same requests coming up for the new plan knowing they were ignored before " — Christine Mueller Dearborn County Indiana An important question to consider is whether your Comprehensive plan is capable of being implemented You would be surprised at the number of statements in many Compre hensive plans that lack clarity or definitiveness and are therefore virtually impossible to imple ment — Ilene Watson Planner Regional Distnct of Central Okanagan Kelowna Bntish Columbia In our small community in Maine we do not have any professional staff Our Compre hensive Plan Review Committee will be dis banded when the plan is approved by the town We have decided to include an action step that creates a three member oversight committee That committee will advocate for action on the plan with all town committees and selectmen The committee will also be a link between the present comp plan commit tee and the future review committee which will convene in five years — Carol Adams Dresden Maine ple associate value with the purchase This marketing truism also applies to community planning To be successful comprehensive plans must convey in a clear and direct manner how the future will be different if they are followed Step Three Commitment to Outcomes A shortcoming common to many plans is the lack of a focused commitment on produc ing the outcomes set out in the plan Too often a planning commission will assume the good things chronicled in the plan will happen simply because they are good This assumption must be avoided The pre ferred future described in the plan will not happen without a commitment to plan implementation - including a commit ment to provide the staff and financial resources needed to carry out the plan Step Four Develop an Implementation Schedule It has been said that a journey of 1 000 miles begins with the first ste similar mindset needs to guide the implementation process For example if your plan features a twenty year planning honzon and several hundred operational objectives and strategies the planning commission must prioritize them A multi faceted strategy one that features short as well as long term action plans is preferable to a strategy that attempts to do everything at once Step Five Assign Implementation Responsibilities Knowing when a plan component or objective will come into play implies knowing who will be respon- sible for implementing it The best way to accomplish this is by assigning specific implementation responsibilities to panic ular departments of the town city or county government Each department can then be held accountable for what it is charged with implementing Assigning responsibilities has two other benefits First departments will be able to see how they fit into the bi ture - and how their role contnbut o the communitys future Second when PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 • Attractively designed bridges like Wilmington It Delawares Washington Street Bridge (left) used to be the noun in our cities and towns But well designed bridges can still be built today as seen in Hanover New Hampshire (below) tll�.,..,L��: y T9 .. ii`yi�FL�� Ill, r_IJUISiff1111f:lliiiISit El;11,0E1 t l i r ;tali al, e�asu�� �����,�-s■�,n�.'r� sir.. ".. Y _. mac. Ohemos Michigans first "roundabout" replaced a congested, signalized intersection Since the photo was tahen the chevrons on the central island have been lowered and several of the sign posts consolidated. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL �c Y 1 . - y Viz,,. L. f { r �A Maine- Perspective� f ,..6 by Kathy Fuller x' r ' a t< �;- :In�the early 1990s (Maine citizens, _ "men cttedthe Sensible TOrtsportat on Policy F A_ct_The law requires examination of a t r ,,range of transportation choices andz_ applies to transportation p• lanning capital - investment an_d project development deer `,sions-lt also seeks to`integrate transports z , non planning with social environmental 'and economic objectives - �u ,, a F> ' 1 Smce then the way the Mame Depart nmerit of Transportation (MDOT) delivers - t � ^=highway projects has changed Design : 4- ¢does nowt begin until after MDOT project „,managers hold a pre design "blank slate" a. ". �w i. -} apubltc,meetmg at which attendees are -. a invited to relAte their'=desires f_or the final M-- product Front neighborhood fnendlq"3"� " i▪ mpiovemen[s lilce sidewalks street light;-, 7, and landscaping to business needs for access4and free flow of goods and services`; Jthis process results in projects;that improve bothcommunity and transporta non Planning for parkways or bypasses incorporate pohcaes of a communitys-, ,. Comprehensive Plan during evaluation of _ - �x wappropnate alternatives `Addressing focal preferences }ioweyer t -.can create mterestmg challenges for the r,- transportation professional-�For example i € ,,communities that designate growth areas along an artenal - a logical market based, approac1 - are supportmgdevelopment patterns that can severely_undernune the, >Yfuncton of that roadway as a long disc x tance through travel economic comdor . • solution that works best fora pamcular ' wt community mot ayYnwork as well from a , _ Festatewide perspectie-Which should take prec Bence' At Mam-e,DOT the project .. development goal is to mtegrate these,„ _ u7, r loften opposing objecuves-However meet Zing these challenges requires more design - = time and often% m ro ,money - -v- ; ..Y " = Kathy Fuller AICP is Assistant Director. 4 of MDOTs Bureau of Planning Research and i Community Sernces Before joinmg MDOT s ,in` 1997 she worked asr'a municipal land `use= planner Fuller is also the Maine Directorfora �" the Northern New England Chapter of the i =PAPA and a past President of,the Maine Also nation of Planners For moretinformation " about Main -el public involvement process .w— n t IL -a 1 4 Q Y "t' , .. „ t ', , / NUMBERt40ti/ FALL 20'00- a - 4 T", a y _ � n ~ � -. -c .- r t i x Wider & Straighter, But `Safer? When arguments are made for why a local road needs to be widened or straightened - improved safety is almost always at or near the top of the list. Many of us automatically assume that road straighteningand widening projects will lead to a dramatic reduction m accidents After all with wider lanes theres more room to maneuver sharp turns are elm' naied and the number of intersections is often reduced Evan Manvel Director of Education and Research for 1000 Fiends of Oregon offers some cautionary notes about this line of rei somng _ _ _ 4 "If we are concerned about everyones ,- safety - dnver passenger pedestrian and cyclist - we find evidence that traffic engineer mg which controls speeds so called traffic calming is much more effecuve than widen mg roads at reducing road accidents Wider straighter roads with more open sight Imes inspire faster dnvtng-Dnvmg at unsafe speeds is already a factor in almost a third of acci dents According to the U S Bureau of Transportation Statistics 85 percent of the fac tors conmbuung to motor vehicle crashes were attributable to driver action 10 percent involved the highway and 5 percent mvolved the vehicle The road environment was found to be the sole factor in only 3 percent of crash es road users in 57 percent In 41 percent of all fatal crashes alcohol is involved' Visibility problems and dnver fatigue are also major contributors to accidents Attention _ to these serious problems is a better way to address traffic safety than road widening and `straightening -Decades of expenence with traffic calming (engineenng roads slow traffic down) and programs aimed at driver behavior have demonstrated ways to improve safety other r than creating huge roads These efforts are usually cheaper and more effective dollar per dollar than realigning or widening roads NHTSA studies_ demonstrate a benefit cost -. ratio of 9 6 1 for traffic safety programs while the highest hfeume benefit rano even road lob- byists estimate for road widemng is 2 7 1 = Studies of ioads before and after traffic calm ing efforts show dramatic decreases m acci dents while actual benefits from road widen mg and straightening are often less than predicted " 1 These numbers are from Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1996 2 Moving Amencans More Safely " NHTSA, Sept. 1991 p u A familiar scene a road being widened. Road Design continued from page 5 without regard for community or envi ronmental impacts Federal law says these standards can be applied flexibly and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has produced an easy -to read manual that thoroughly discusses the issue of design flexibility in federally funded road pro jects This publication entitled Flexibili ty in Htghway Design can be obtained from the FHWA ICA Resources p 8 Context sensitive design is a collabo rative interdisciplinary approach invol ving all stakeholders to ensure that transportation projects are designed in harmony with the community and pre- serve historic scenic aesthetic and environmental resources — while main taining safety and mobility But until recently most communities had to fight to get anything but the off the shelf" design Consider one example bndge rail ings For over a century bridges have been some of Americas greatest engi veering and manufacturing achieve ments Bndge railings were often works of art metal trusses concrete balu strades decorative stone and other var ied matenals However in recent years the standard bndge railing — regardless of the type of bridge or location — has become a Jersey Bamer This has hap- pened despite the fact that there are dozens of approved crash tested alter- natives to Jersey bamers While maintaining a safe driving environment is fundamentally impor tant to highway design there are a range of legally acceptable solutions to almost any road design problem Just consider two recent projects in Brooklyn Con- necticut and Okemos Michigan In Okemos Michigan a busy inter section at the corner of Marsh • Hamilton near the local mall was pro posed for improvement to eliminate congestion that sometimes resulted in thirty vehicles backed up at the red light The conventional approach would have added new lanes to facilitate and separate left turns from nght turns and through traffic Instead the County Road Commis sion constructed a new two lane round- about — a modern smaller scale vanant of the old-style traffic circle Despite a great deal of initial skepticism the roundabout has proven to be both popu- lar and efficient In place of the traffic light the roundabout now safely moves more that 2 000 vehicles per hour with less delay than the old design Local res- idents say they like the roundabout and the most vocal cntic has even changed his mind A second larger roundabout designed for more than 3 500 vehicles per hour opened to traffic in A t 2000 on the Michigan State Univ�y continued on page 8 • • departments know that they will be called to account for their assigned responsibili ties they will be more inclined to carry them out in a timely manner Step Six Establish a Timeline This is a logical byproduct of the preceding two steps A reasonable timeframe needs to be established for each phase of the plan implementation process A plan featunng hundreds of strategies and policies cannot be implemented in a single year Instead a multi year implementation cycle will be required By assigning a timeline to each phase of the implementation schedule the planning commission governing body and members of the public will know when each component of the plan should be completed Step Seven Link the Plan with the Bud get Linking the plan with the multi year capital program and annual operating budget is another way to assure plan implementation One way to achieve this outcome is to calculate the costs associat ed with the vanous objectives and strate gies referenced in the plan Where appropnate these costs should be includ ed in either the capital or the operating budget As management expert Peter Drucker is fond of saying the real value of a plan can be measured by an organiza tions willingness to back it with money The Capital Improvement Program Step Eight Document the Difference A final step involves documenting the differ ence the plan is making on behalf of the community Taking the time to inventory the vanous impacts the plan is generating and then sharing this information with the community puts accountability into the planning process Most importantly it also lets the public know that the plan is being used — and that all the time that went into developing the plan was well spent • Michael Chandler is Professor & Community Planning Extension Special tst at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg VA Chandler also conducts planning commissioner training pro grams across the country and is a frequent speaker at workshops His column appears in each issue of the PCJ 'Measuring Performance tby Catherine Avon Hilton Michael Chandler m Step Four notes the importance of adopting alongside the plan an implementation process commit- tmg the community to the plans orderly enactment W thin that quietly spoken truth is the implication to skillfully devise measurable objecuves by which to assess the adopted plans effectiveness Planners understand the reasons why Step Eight. _ Document the Difference is impossible to achieve without first doing the homework However daunting the task associated with Step Four initially appears to be pro fessional and citizen planners must provide for companson of changed conditions over time The inherent difficulty is m finding appropnate performance measuring sticks that can accurately gauge the plans useful- ness validity and common sense What is measurability? In its most sim plisuc form if the question of achievement of an objective can be answered "yes" or "no scored "one" or "zero " performance has been measured Even on that scale a community can test and evaluate its adopt ed planning policies Developing pohcy is an inexact art However by consistently emphasizing quantitative parameters it will be easier to evaluate the success of the plan at a later time Countable cntena (i e completion date percent change size den sines or benchmarks ) are indicators of - the achievement of such intangibles as _ community "livability" "safe neighbor hoods and good schools Quantitative indicators are essential to evaluate plan performance with regard to quality of hfe issues whereas descnpttve qualitative cnte- na are better used within the vision state- ment or as long-range goals r `� How much time is required to complete Step Four to include a set of performance measures? The answer is of course up to the community prepanng its new plan -Yet clearly the painstaking work at the front end of the planning process to establish measurable objectives will be offset by time - and cost savings over the life of the plan Cathenne Avon Hilton AICP is a Senior Planner with the Tn County Regional Planning Commission in Peona, Illinois The Capital Improvement Program Zoning and subdivision regulations are the most famihar "tools used to implement the comprehensive plan Another important implementation tool is the capital improvement program usu ally referred to as the CIP The CIP is a management and fiscal planning tool communities can use for financing and constructing needed public improvements and facilities Properly designed a CIP enables a community to identify its capital needs rank them by pnonty coordinate their scheduling and determine the best method of paying - for there within the cormunitys fiscal- _ - capacity Baseline requirements for C1Ps mclude that the CIP be based on the - comprehensive plan and that it schedule capital improvements over a specific number of years (commonly three five or six) Usually the planning commission annually prepares a recommended CIP and then forwards it to the local govern ing body for adoption Project requests should be based upon a set of guidehnes and be submit ted by the vanous municipal (or county) departments The engmeenng financial or planning staff is usually responsible for providing assistance to the other mumct pal departments in completing project request forms Project requests are exam med to see that they are complete accu rate and in conformance with the community's CIP guidelines This review also assesses proposed projects as to their feasibility pricing and consistency with the comprehensive plan Excerpts fmm Michael Chandler's series "Capital Improvement Programs " in PCJ - #2527 r PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMMIrSSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 ETHICS & THE PLANNING COMMISSION Making Your Opinion Known drticipation in public affairs and engaging in civic discourse are well -established traditions in our democracy As a planning commis- sion member you are probably interested in a wide range of public policy issues and often would like for your individual oice to be heard beyond the planning commission chambers However are there ethical constraints to how you can make your opinion known as an individual? Consider this hypothetical situation a proposed development project is heard by your Planning Commission on several zomng and site plan approval issues The Planning Commission ulumately recom- mends approval of the project to City Council (in your state the governing body makes the final decision after receiving the planning commission rec- ommendation) You were in the minonty having voted against the project because you believed its parking layout failed to conform to certain design cntena in the zoning ordinance As part of the proposal the applicants are also requesting certain tax abate- ments Under your ordinance decisions on tax abatements are not considered by the Planning Commission and are with- in the sole review of the Council As an Individual you oppose the use of tax abatements to encourage development However this was not a factor in your vote as a planning commissioner When the project comes before your Council you decide to appear as an indi- vidual and voice your opposition to the tax abatements You also urge the council to require the developer to revise the pro posed parking layout You are surpnsed however, when a City Council member becomes upset that you are appearing before the council to voice an opinion about the project The council mem ber tells you that your testimony is by C Gregory Dale AICP inappropnate since you have already had your say in the process as a Planning Commission member As a new planning commissioner you are confused and per plexed by this reaction MAKE—AA-DIST=IN C—T ION— ETWEEN_:THE -QUESTION_ OF -WI -TETHER OR NOT YOU - "-HAVE -THE RIG HT". TO ENGAGE IN• CERTAIN ACTIVITIES, AND THE QUESTION OF ._ WHETHER IT IS "THE RIGHT THING TO DO." Is the city councilor right? Was it inappropnate for you to tesufy - or did you have the nght to express your views? "THE RIGHT THING TO DO" By the way of background as I have Indicated in many previous columns you have a responsibility as a public offi- cial to protect the integnty of your office The bond of trust between the planning commission and the community is para- mount as is protecting your credibility as a planning commission member Hav- ing said this does this mean you have "forfeited" your right to express your opinion as an individual outside of the context of planning commission meet- ings? As a general pnnciple I believe it is important to make a dtsuncuon between the question of whether or not you have the nght to engage in certain activities and the question of whether it is "the right thing to do Certainly you have the right to engage in a wide range of activities even though your conduct may not necessanly be the right thing to do under the circumstances In the hypo- • • thetical situation I posed what is the nght thing to do? Let me offer some thoughts to help work through this question A starting point is to consider whether your comments are related to an issue that comes within the purview of the Planning Commission If your remarks are unrelated to planning mat ters you should feel comfortable in speaking out as an individual For example the way in which your local government handles a labor issue in the Police Department is a public policy issue on which you may have a strong opinion Voicing that opinion to your governing body is completely appropri- ate and should not raise any concerns Similarly in the hypothetical posed since the Planning Commission has no say in tax abatement decisions (please no e this is only for purposes of the hypo ical - there very well may be planning commissions that do have a role in this!) you should be able to speak before the City Council on this issue i As a Planning Commission member you do not give up your ability to speak out on a range of civic issues You should be careful however in how you do so You should make it clear that you are not speaking as a Planning Commission member but as an Interested citizen Even so do not be surpnsed if some peo- ple believe you are using the mantle" of the Planning Commission to give your comments greater impact than those 1 This would clearly be the case if you were speaking about tax abatement policy m general However since you are raising the issue with respect to a specific pro- ject your commission reviewed you are edging closer to an area which might be inappropriate for you to comment on Much depends on the norms of your community as l will discuss in the balance of the aru cle However I would find it unusual for a commum ty to consider it inappropriate for a pia commissioner to be able to speak out before thgell emmg body on an issue that was not before the com mission for consideration • • A In Vermont as in many states older bridges which seemed to fit naturally into the landscape have been replaced by bridges with far less char acter Above is a view of the 329 foot long metal truss bridge spanning the Lamoille River in West Milton alongside its recently built replacement There still is a chance the 98 year old bndge may be preserved for use by pedestnans and bicyclists No such possibility exists in Waterbury Vennont where the 1928 "Smiths Store" steel truss bndge carrying U S Route 2 over the Winooski River (opposite page lower left) was demolished and replaced by a typical highway style bndge in the early 1990s deft) to use their own design standards in sensitive locations Federal law also makes it clear that highway projects should be developed with respect for social environmental and cultural resources The origin of most state and local road standards is the publicauon A Polt cy on Geometric Design of Streets and Highways also known as the Green Book This publication by the Ameri- can Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) sets out recommended designs standards on all federal aid highway projects Contro- versy over design standards often arises when state highway departments take the Green Book standards and apply them in a ngid and unyielding fashion continued on page 6 f , Road. Capacity & Induced 'ravel - :� tee.- � -A recentreportbythe Surface phenomenon known as induced travel, k jTranspoirauon Policy Protect (STPP) has Y,� 4 occurs,when load capacity is ezpandedand`I t found that in'p.c`reasing road capacity leads to 'dnvers Elock,[o the new facih ho into . increased traffic load`s-Analyzing data pro , -save time The new roadways also tend t'o 24'Y—C i 1 i��ti` vtded by the Texas�Transporta�n institute _ draw people who would otherwise avoid - x r STPP found that every 10 percent increase a k congested cotichuons_or take alternative R=i - fin the highway network resultsziin a 5 3 per- _ modes to their destinations "- ` Half of the -'cent increase in the amount of dnvin`g` #over -new ry = F ` y _ _ highway capacityhas been filled with,, a 'and above an increases caused o lation , �. y �� �' Y ti driving that would not have occurred &the <i t r 'growth or other factors In addition the { ' T road spaces.'had not beenradded 'Iitthe ', r ' anal sis concludes that road buildin has , z ' y -.. - 4 . , g , -� along run ,this encourages additional devel i not been an effectiveicongestion-fighting '`'''. . p n�. -~ ,r -, j e e r , opment: nearby,ancUthat leads to even more, measure In fact STPP found that those E- - :y f „a ti vvOct 4tc., , 'traffic" I` - / r -„4--z ..•` r =metro areas that�added the most highway ; x ; F _ �" - -' ; r , - The report, Why Are The Roads So,_,,t space per person saw con estion levels risen �� , As the report notes` One explanation J for this outcome is that new and wider' roads tend to generate new traffic This at a sit lit! lit her rate than areas'that ,- Congested? }A Companion Analysts of -the - l~� w �a-n k °`Y r � r ' g s, y g = v� „ r t Texas Transportation Institutes Data Ong ,-;'- added few roads per residen'tt ,:r e ' ham, ort , Metropolitan Congestion is available from r- As the STPP report descnb_es "We spbt i , �` .,' the Surface Transportation Policy Project at } --the 68 metro areas included in Texas Trans- ' _ , " k - = (202) 466-2636`or on their Web site. ` 4 portation`Institutes studyinto three groups ., r _ ` ? and comparedlthe congestion fates for the-2'' , uwww transact org A Fr r -t lugh and low group-Thejhiggh roadsbuild " _ Noted transportation policy expert , -mg areas increaseddroad capacity per person` Anthony Downs has also noted that ^ by 28 percent while the low -road building "authorities improve highways+to fight con i areas actually decreased road capactty per gestion but then those improvements cre Z_A-i "`person by 11 percent Despite this vitae dz., -,- ate incennyes to (1) increase automobile - - crepancy the rush-hour con`gestton profiles f vehicle ownershtp and use and (2)Achan"ge - gas measured by the Travel Rate Index for the location and form of both resndetitial `l- reach'group are almost identikcal�lnterestmg „ J; ▪ and nonresidential growth " From Stuck m =- lithe !ugh road building ai eas show slight ' _1 Traffic Coptrig" W th Peak Hour Tra fic Con_,�� -ly lugher,congest on levels than the low,y µ " gestion (Waslung�on-D�C The Brookings v., road building areas throughout the period " - s, lnstituti_on 1994) p 31 ` -- - -, a . { K Y-',nF PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMM NUMBER 40-/FAIL 42600„ems f `Yr so, t .1� 1 - � �.:. bi n>' .; _ c FEATURE Road Design your local government ev=r been notified that the state highway department is planning to improve" a rural scenic road recon- figure a congested suburban intersection or replace a histonc bndge in your com munity? Each year Amencan communities are presented with plans to expand or rebuild streets roads and bridges Whether the community is rural or sub urban in Eastern Oregon or Northern Virginia the explanation is almost always the same A road that local people are accustomed to is said to be deficient It does not conform to the latest stan- dards It is not wide enough or it has too many curves Unless something is done motorists will experience delays or unsafe conditions Plans are presented that call for a road that is straighter flatter and above all wider than before The highway department calls the project a road improvement but many local citizens are opposed to the project Why? Because conventional road widening and bridge reconstruction projects often damage scenery natural resources and A Turn Ahead by Edward T McMahon community character for little or no real benefit The conventional approach to road design aims to move more traffic faster at the expense of everything else In her book The Living Ctty author Roberta Gratz tells the story of a small town that seeks help with repairs to an aging bndge only to be told that repainng the bridge is not cost efficient Only by widening the two-lane bridge to four lanes would federal funds be available Adding two lanes however will require widening and straightening the road that provides access to the bndge This will • in turn require using adjacent parkland cutting down a row of 100-year-old trees and demolishing several histonc build- ings When local residents oppose the out of -scale soluuon they are accused of opposing progress and are told federal rules require the new wider bndge Does this sound familiar? Well it should because this scenario in one form or another has been repeated through America Over scaled over- priced highway projects are imposed where smaller less expensive equally useful and more environmentally benign solutions would do r c_ ,i,--t, t di, .,.- ._ S)' ,}-- - 3 4-7, i I.�.. y i t, • >4c rx�T' y .ebY1" _ 7� While environmentally harmful oversized highway projects are familiar to us all the good news is that this all - too common way of designing roads and bridges is being challenged A growing number of citizens planners and local officials are demanding that local trans- portation improvements incorporate context -sensitive" highway design (also known as "place sensitive or flexible" highway design) to preserve community character and environmental resour Whats more federal transportation legislation now gives states the flexibility from an average citizen " But what about the second part of the hypothetical where you addressed the council about a site plan issue that was • considered by the Planning Commission and on which you were in the minonty? Was it appropnate for you to address the Council about this? COMMUNITY NORMS OF APPROPRIATE CONDUCT Your first step should be to consult with your Commissions legal counsel There may be instances in some states where it is not appropriate to engage in this activity particularly when your commission acts in a quasi judicial capacity If there are no legal restrictions I would suggest you need to consider the norms of your community In many communities when a planning commis sioner is involved in review of a project it would be considered inappropriate for that commissioner to try to have a sec and bite at the apple by going before the governing body to argue for another out come Remember the planning commission should expresses its opinion in written findings and recommendations that the governing body receives When a com missioner in the minonty feels strongly the appropriate place to make note of this would be in a minonty or dissenting statement attached to the commissions decision or included in the minutes A judicial analogy is helpful In those states where planning commissions make final decisions subject only to court review the court will ordinanly not allow a dis sensing commissioner to appear in court to testify and argue that the commissions decision was wrong There are other communities howev er where the norm may be that it is acceptable for planning commission members — including those who disagreed with the majority decision — to appear before the governing body to explain their position This is often the case in smaller counties cities or towns where a plan- ning commissions wntten decision is cur- sory in nature without a detailed explanation for its recommendation But even in some communities where the planning commission does provide the governing body with a well -reasoned written recommendation the community norm may be that it is acceptable for plan- ning commissioners to come before the governing body to voice their opinion And then there are the communities where the norms are unclear or have never been articulated Thats where most of the problems — and hard feelings — will anse In any case should you choose to come before the governing body to voice your opinion you should expect that some may view your efforts as an abuse of your authonty BEING PROACTIVE As with many of the issues I have addressed in this column over the past ten years the best approach is to be proactive — that is to know how to han dle anticipated situations before they occur Your planning commission may find it helpful to discuss in a work ses sion how minority views can be expressed — coming up with guidelines for what is appropnate Better yet bnng up the subject at a work session between commissioners and governing body members Both bodies can then reach an understanding of what will or will not be considered appropnate thereby clan fying the communitys norms 2 Having the ground rules spelled out in advance will not only avoid hard feelings in the future but make it easier for new (or potential) commissioners to know what is expected Let me be clear in highlighting the role of a communitys norms of acceptable conduct 1 am not approaching this from the standpoint of your legal nghts If you have a question about whether there are legal restncuons against certain behavior please consult your planning commission attorney or other legal counsel If your desire to speak out on an issue ultimately conflicts with the norms of your community you will need to bal- 2 A Joint session might also consider the converse question not covered in this article are there times when it is inappropriate for a governing body member to testify before the planning commission on a matter, ance the effect your action will have on the credibility and integnty of the plan- ning commission against the importance of your expressing personal views on the issue In balancing these remember that when you accept appointment as a plan ning commissioner you are accepting responsibility associated with being a public official — and being part of a body which needs to work together on a van- ety of important matters • C Gregory Dale is a Principal with the plan ning and zoning firm of McBride Dale Clarion in Cincinnati Ohio Dale manages planning projects and conducts training for planning officials through out the country He is also a former President of the Ohio Chapter of the Amer tcan planning Association Taking a Closer Look. Ethics Taking a Closer Look is a collection of Greg Dales Ethics & the Planning Commission columns from the past nine years It includes articles on conflicts of in terest ex parte contacts bias accept ing gifts and many other concerns Now available for $14 00 ($12 60 for PCJ subscnbers) Either call our office at 1 888 475 3328 (toll free) or order from the PlannersWeb www plannersweb coin PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 FEATURE THE EFFECTIVE PLANNING COMMISSIONER Planning Commissioner Perspectives • THE MOST IMPORTANT ATTRIBUTES OF A STRONG PLANNING COMMISSION Diversity; Outreach; Constructive Recommendations by Monica Craven From my perspective the three most important charac teristics of an effective planning commission are (1) a vanety of exper use among commissioners (2) suc- cessful community outreach and (3) the ability to formulate constructive recommendations to the govern ing body An effective planning commission is composed of members with different backgrounds and expertise A commis sion too heavy in any one profession be it lawyer architect planner developer economist or any one point of view — preservationist environmentalist pro development anti -development — only limits the effectiveness of the commission An ideal planning commission has a blend of backgrounds and interests that reflect the vanety of opinions in the community as a whole An effective planning commission reaches out to the community and does not limit its interaction with the commu- nity to a single public heanng With the help of the planning staff the planning commission can organize and participate in outreach efforts such as public forums and walking tours to name a few Com- munity input into a proposed project before the public heanng can also lead the developer to improve the project By involving the community early in the process the effective planning commis sion also lays the groundwork not only for more relevant public testimony but for a more cohesive discussion of the issues among the commission Itself The third charactenstic of an effective Editors Note In the last issue of the Plan ning Commissioners Journal you heard six planning board members offer some advice to new members In this issue three more planning commissioners speak to the question of what mahes for an effective planning board We asked them to dis cuss what they felt were the two or three most important attributes of a strong planning commis sion The final short essay by Teresa Levitch looks at the role of the commissions chairperson We hope to run addition al perspectives from planning commissioners in future issues of the PCJ I hope some of you will consider sharing what you ve learned with your colleagues across the country Please call or e mail our office (1 888 475 3328 toll free pcj@together net) and we can discuss whats involved in submitting a short essay planning commission is its ability to give constructive recommendations to the governing body A planning commission that merely rubber stamps the recommendation of the planning staff or is not well educated on the issues at hand is not in a position to make a recommendation that will be of any use to elected officials However a planning com mission that has done its home work throughout the process can discuss the issues knowledgeably After public testimony has been given it can hone in on the rele vant outstanding concerns discuss each separately and thoroughly and after all issues have been aired consider a detailed motion that includes all aspects of the project The effective planning commis sion concludes the public heanng not just with a yea or nay vote but with specific recommendations that will give the elect ed body a framework for its own delibera Loons Monica Craven has been a member of the Arlington County Virginia Planning Commission since 1994 and charred the Commission in 1999 She serves on the Commissions Long Range Plan rung Committee Site Plan Review Subcommittee and chairs the Zoning Oidinance Review Commit tee In her "other life she is Administrative Assis tant to the Superintendent of Schools for the Catholic Diocese of Arlington Knowledge; Willingness to Listen; Objectivity by Carl FW Kohn Three important charactenstics of an effective planning commission are (1) a working knowledge of local zoning ordi nances in relation to the local history and the comprehensive plan (2) a willing to listen to the public without com miring local planning pnnciples and (3) the ability to be objective in making plan ping decisions These charactenstics are not totally mutually exclusive but represent dtf ferent facets of how an effective plan ning commission does its job First of all planning commissioners must know the communitys guiding laws — its zoning ordi nances Such knowledge can not be merely a memorization of the ordinances Rather it must involve understanding the ordinances in the context of what the community has been and become what has contributed to its success and what has pre vented inappropriate growth and development The second charactenstic of an effec rive planning commission is a wilhn to listen with sensitivity to the pub tc Neither the planning commission nor the • • Getting Out to Where the People Are We re Having a Public Event at the Shopping Mall Won t you Drop by and Tell us What yo �Think about the Future of our Town? Ott vas a sunny Friday People were at their local mall as usual, shopping, strolling, meeting their fnends and neighbors Prominent among the storefronts in the center of all the activity was something new a display about Our Town — what it is and what it might become depending on the plan ping decisions that soon would be made Maps and drawings and possible alternatives m simple text were displayed attractively Staff and commissioners stood nearby to engage onlookers in con- versation and entice them to participate People were invited to stay as long as they liked — to wnte their comments on the displays and handy pads of paper talk to planners fill out questionnaires and otherwise participate in a low key but important exercise to help determine their communitys future Compliments abounded "No one ever asked my opinion before! Thanks for coming out to the mall 1 never have time for meetings Its great that you 11 be here after work 111 be back with my husband Seniors dropped by and wrote down their opinions all the while remi- niscing about days gone by Teen rappers and mall employees were quick to point out what they liked and did not favor about the suggested alternatives A diverse variety of people was obviously comfortable and familiar in the mall environment and willing to participate when asked For the organizers it was a long exhausting yet exhilarating day We were at the mall early in the morning before it opened to set up the displays and on our feet until 7 that evening At umes we felt like barkers cajoling people Just look or Try it You might like it Most people by Elaine Cogan did at least take a peek and many stayed to take advantage of the many non- adversanal ways to voice their opinions Some held intense conversations with their fnends or members of the planning commission and staff But it was all in a spirit of goodwill and civility In that environment it would have been unthinkable to behave otherwise From more than 25 years expenence designing and facilitating public partici pauon processes it is obvious to me that the most successful are those where we go out to the people — not expect them to come to us Only the most committed or zealous citizens will come out to a public meeting just because the planning board or staff think it is important Why the mall? Because that is where the people Online Comment Its very true that you have to go out to where the people are — and when they re there When we do charrettes and similar activities in small towns that don t have malls 1 ve found that coupling the events with pan cake breakfasts or fish fnes at the local vol unteer fire department usually help get the folks out Food is always a great way to draw a crowd I also find that if you have pictures (especially ones taken by local residents with disposable cameras we give them) and maps and let folks write on and/or draw on them it makes it even more real for them —Jim Segedy AICP Muncie Indiana Chair Small Town & Rural Planning Division APA are! I have arranged two events in shop ping malls such as descnbed above and the success has been phenomenal If you are not so inclined or ambi nous there are other ways to take your planning show on the road Put up mini displays at the local library or communi- ty center always with opportunities for the public to comment Organize a speakers bureau and make presentations to your local neighborhood and civic organizations Get on the Web Nearly every community has a Web site some more ambitious and attractive than oth ers Post your information and invite comments In all these ways and more you probably can think of you will reach people who may never otherwise be involved in civic activity Public involvement that truly engages the hearts and minds of the citi zenry in a civil manner is increasingly difficult to obtain We all know people with strong opinions will make their voices heard at public heanngs and other formal occasions But what about all those umes it would be valuable to learn what people think before the controversy erupts or perhaps to defuse it entirely in an environment that encourages dia- logue and conversation? Be creative in choosing venues that encourage such interaction and you will be well rewarded With these approach es it is even possible you will avoid enurely the yelling and polanzing meet ings that benefit no one ♦ Elaine Cogan partner in the Portland Oregon planning and communica tions firm of Cogan Owens Cogan is a consultant to many communities under taking strategic planning or visioning processes Her column appears in each issue of the PCJ PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 FROM THE EDITOR Almost Ten I want to share with you a few thoughts about the Planning Commissioners Journal as we near our tenth year of publication As you may know we are a small independent publication - we re not affiliated with any other business or organization Our mission is to provide the most useful information possible to citizen planners" - pnmanly members of town city county and regional planning and zoning boards - though we re also pleased to hear that w many professional planners read the PCJ We re about the release a publication I think many planning departments will find especially useful to provide to new commissioners Titled Welcome to the Commission A Guide for New Members the 40 page publication is divided into two parts The first provides a series of helpful tips for new members while the second part looks at how planning commis sions fit into the "planning universe " The Guide includes selected short excerpts from past PCJ articles with illustrations by Mark Hughes See the back page for more details As I mentioned we re also neanng our loth anniversary in print We would like to cele brate this milestone by taking a cross country tour" in our 10th anniversary issue - high lighting some of the concerns communities and their planning commissions are facing and how they re being addressed But we need your help! Please consider taking the time to be interviewed over the phone by someone from our staff later this Fall or Winter For more on whats involved see the note enclosed with this mailing (only one note is being sent to each subscnbing community) or call our office at 1 888 475 3328 Finally you ve probably noticed the online comments" accompanying many of the articles we publish Over 300 visitors to our Planners Web site have signed up to receive by e marl drafts of articles submitted for publication in the PCJ There is no obligation to comment on any article - but the feedback we receive often results in improvements to the final article For more on this go to wwwplannersweb com NOTICE ,1124.A. Wayne M Senville Edttor FEATURES © Road Design - A Turn Ahead by Edward T McMahon Too often new roadways have been designed to be wider and straighter without much consideration being given to the character of the surrounding community In recent years however there has been a gradual turn towards more thoughtful "context sensitive roadway design Edward T McMahon looks at whats behind this change in direction 0 Integrating Land Use and Transportation by Whit Blanton A growing number of communities are recog nixing the close relationship between trans portation planning decisions and land use In these places transportation planning involves more than just providing for better mobility Transportation planner Whit Blanton reports on how one metropolitan area has begun to put land use and transportation in balance ® Planning Commissioner Perspectives Planning commissioners from Virginia Pennsylvania Utah and New York offer their perspectives on what makes for an effective planning board and on the role of the chair person DEPARTMENTS © The Effective Planning Commissioner Elaine Cogan looks at how a shopping mall became the locauon for a creative planning event na The Planning Commission At Work Most planning commissioners realize that all the effort spent on prepanng a comprehen sive plan will only pay off if the plans pohcies and objectives are implemented Michael Chandler offers an eight step process for helping assure that your plan is brought to life n3 Ethics & the Planning Commission Are there any constraints on when a planning board member can speak out publicly as an individual rather than as a representative of the board? Greg Dale looks at some political and ethical considerations L`A `N N I N`G M I-S Stl O `N E R'S, ,1 F.- 'Champlain-Planning Press Inc r P O Box 4295 Burhngton VT 05406 Tel 802-864-9083 • Fax 802-862 1882 - j E mail pg@logether net } _ , i __ S plannersweb coin r 1 f r _ Editor _ Assistant Editor' - a - Wayne M Senville Dean L PierceLAICP1 L, i r Project Manager Editorial i —Ehzabeth M Krumholz_ !'"Advisory _Board,_ ,-1 " - Jeanette Carr . PCJ Columnists , ' North Muuni Florida _ a 1 l t '' Elaine Cogan — a { Portland Oregon — 1— Call FW Kohn , 503 225-0192 - --Carroll Valley r 1 ! ~' „cocplans@aol com - Pennsylvania - 1 -Michael Chandler -- Lee A Krohn AICP , 1 ,Blacksburg, Virginia ; Manchester Vermont ` I r 1 rmchan@vt e94d r-Steve Langworthys 1 Grand Rapids Michigan ,^� !i C Gregory Dale AICP L i Cincinnati Ohio 1- " 513 272 5533 GregDale f @compuserve com Edward McMahon Alexandna, Virginia 703 525 6300 Wayne Lemmon r 1 Silver Sprang, Mary` land King Leonar ICP' - Lompoc Ca a Ross Moldoff, Salem New Hampshire -emcmahon a @con3ervauonfund org Y Quay AICP Phoenix, Anzona `Design Iry Schiffinan Ned Corbett Chico California r Femsburgh Vermont Bryan Stumpf AICP r Cover Illustration-_ r Indianapolis indianarc Paul Hoffman r Barbara Sweet Greenfield, Massachusetts- Hyde Park New York 4 r Sub`scnption Information 1, ,,,Published 4 times/year Standard Rate $55/year Addition al subscriptions matled to the same address $9 each/year Y ISSN 1058 5605 Postmaster and Subscribers Send - address changes to Planning Commissioners Journal, P O Box 42951Burlington, VT 05406 [e Editonal Policy Articles and columns contained in the Journal,do not- necessanlyrieflect the views of the -Journal The Journal is kcopynght'protected by Champlain Planning Press 2000 For peimtssion to reproduce or distribute any portion of theJoiu C nal contact the Editor This publication is designed to provide r,-accurate and authontative mforrmatiion on the subject matter 1 covered It is sold with the understanding that thtsher is not engaged in rendenng legal accounting or profes sional services If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought communitys zoning ordinances came into being or operate in an isolated stenle or Ideal environment Despite a working knowledge of the ordinances (and per haps an inclination therefore to issue deci sions as Zeus would from Mount Olympus) the planning commission members need to know the perspectives of the citizens who live in the midst of the situation the decision would affect The third important charactenstic of an effective planning commis sion is in some ways the obverse of the first It is the planning commissions ability to be objec tive in making decisions remain ing faithful to local ordinances and plans despite public pressure to decide a matter in a particular way The effective planning commission needs to be aware of such pressures but not be swayed by them in mak ing a decision Carl FW Kohn is a member of the Carroll Val ley Pennsylvania Planning Commission and a retired United Methodist pastor He also serves on the Planning Commissioners Journal s Editorial Advisory Board Working Relationships; Community Education; Ethics by Jim Hams An effective planning commission must enjoy an internal harmony in order to work with other groups such as elected officials and professional planners and ensure good communication between its members The commission should work together Organizations which experience internal conflicts seldom perform well and are less likely to unify their energies towards meeting their goals In addition to maintaining good inter- nal communication the commission must have good working relationships with other organizations in the community The most important group the commis- sion deals with is the city council or other legislative body It is important also to work effectively with other governmental organizations and agencies such as school boards highway departments federal agencies and even other planning com- missions A commission must interact with citizens and special interest groups to assure that planning is consistent with community needs and desires A planning commission should also take the responsibility to educate the community Citizens cannot be expected to be familiar with zoning ordinances and planning matters but the planning commission through the use of public hearings public meetings and joint work sessions can effectively com- municate and educate the public Public hearings and meetings allow two way communi- cation between the commis sion and the community The result should pave the way for improved possibilities for public support Last but not least establish good integnty and a code of ethics and abide by them For example avoid conflicts of interest and refuse gifts and favors from anyone if they are offered You should also avoid political activity in which your position as a planning commissioner may bnng tnflu ence As a planning commissioner you hold an important position of public responsibility Jim Hams is a planning commtssioner for the City of North Ogden Utah He formerly worked as an engineer and master planner and now oper ates his own photography and graphic design business THE ROLE OF THE COMMISSION'S CHAIRPERSON Chairing the Board by Teresa Levitch Being appointed the chairperson of a town planning or zoning board means that you have a different responsibility than just attending meetings As the chairperson your new responsibilities include making the community feel they are a part of the process communicating with the other town boards and educat- ing the public about the planning process Many people who attend town plan- ning or zoning board meetings do not know the process of a public meeting You have a duty to make sure the meeting is planned in an efficient and democratic manner Many people attending the meet- ing may not know the proper way or time to address the board The chairperson should have a detailed well prepared agenda and follow it It is helpful to the public to have extra copies of the agenda available especially at controversial pub lic heanngs The chairperson is responsi- ble for maintaining order This means enforcing the riles so the board can work in the most expedient and impartial man ner Reading a guide to Roberts Rules will provide you with an outline to follow Communication with members of other town boards is another important job of the chairperson One way to do this is to request copies of each boards min utes You should also have a copy of your boards minutes sent to the other boards This will help ensure that everyone is aware of the principal issues facing the town The chairperson should also seek assistance from other organizations when the planning or zoning board needs some help in doing its job In my town in upstate Nev‘ York there are a variety of groups we can draw on including the Board of Health the County Planning Board the State Department of Environ mental Conservation the Coopera tive Extension Service our State Association of Towns and the Ne s York Planning Federation Organizations like these can provide useful information on a range of issues as well as training opportunities to help board members in their role Chairing your board or commission is an exciting ven ture You will have an important role in the communitys devel- opment and land use decision making process The decisions Ili,you make and your ability to communicate with members of your own and other boards make being the chairperson a challenging job Teresa Levitch is Chairperson of the Zoning Board of Appeals in the Town of Unton Vale locat ed in Dutchess County New York She lives in a Hamlet Zone with her husband and two daughters PLANNING COMMISSIONERS J OURNAL / NUMBER t40 /'FALL 2000 ¢� PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 Welcome to the Commission! A Guide for New Members In conversations we ve had with Planning Commissioners Journal subscnbers we ve heard many plan ning directors and long time com missioners express the desire for a publication that could be handed to new planning board members to give them a head start on the role they re stepping into We ve tned to meet this need with our newest publication Welcome to the Commission I — A Guide for New Members The first half of the Guide is orga nized around 10 key tips for new mem bers The second half introduces new commissioners to some of the most important players in the planning universe — starung with a look at the role of the planning commission itself 10 Tips for New C 1 Listen! 2 Do Your Homework 3 Be Pohte And Patient 4 Ask Questions 5 Avoid "Ex Parte Contacts 6 Educate Yourself The Guide for New Members is 40 pages long and incorporates carefully selected excerpts from past PCJ articles and columns Illustra- tions by cartoonist Mark Hughes help highlight points made in the text At the ommissioners 7 Recogmze Conflicts of Interest 8 Attend And Contribute 9 Be Independent & Informed 10 Make A Difference The Planning Universe • The Planning Commission • The Local Governing Body • Citizens • Planning staff • The Law (and Lawyers) • Developers & Builders • The Media • Nearby Comm unities end of the Guide you 11 also find an annotated reading list noting books of particular interest to new commis- sioners We believe the Guide for New Members is a publi- cation you 11 want to provide to new members Ordenng informauon can be found inside your mailing envelope In case you don t have the order form simply call our toll free number 1-888-475-3328 or e mail us at pcj@together net Order collections of article reprints from back issues of the PCJ focusmg on • Sprawl �t ds ape • Ou • p. • • • Et, Co aw lay :.n c tinging Society l ring Law Pnmer ign & Aesthetics nsportation Planning cs & the Planning ission • New Dev Traditional Pa e s • Green Infrastructure Each attracuvely bound collec- tion contains between twelve and fifteen articles related to the topic For details or to order contact the Planning Commissioners Journal at Phone (888) 475 3328 Fax (802) 862 1882 E mail pcj@together net www plannersweb com PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER LQt 4 In Coming Issues of the • • • PLANNING COMMISSIONERS gamer on the' juseiof zoning eveloping 3f�'1��.f p�lementtng ��designgui_deli{nesTr roac4ening citizen Artapation,in planning I onomic d elopment issues fucingrtplanners 1; •rMore essay�sibytplanning oommissioners x YIgL L9+24.0 0 0' w`Cl • • PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NEWS & INFORMATION FOR CITIZEN PLANNERS Which Road III We Take? PLANNING COMMISSIONERS JOURNAL / NUMBER 40 / FALL 2000 ^47 rtx ) l 4 S Elaine I - :ano�fl-ri�:�r pnersxcame ' f oppeli ma11E� _ # 7 s_ J K `'. i� s24'- oad Desmil ,; ► m4Ahead . strmghterF wuerate oo? aw3c -4 e atmg ` n d Useira d ansportation y )v on�metro area.'' .s- a tng tom nitider,-„ ' e policies in: its brtahon plans ''z . illift.flannifit'i Commissio_n� At�WOrk��, °�'� F::: etgR[ step,process , otp implement you , rrehenAlton'; r,- .5 t E ICS , R, le` -- 8the Planning "Comfloslon r m eagv - a k�- .. vealiing out on civic jsueslcangraue harrd r ::e..„11-::::::_TEt! Planning_x .Commissioner 4 -espectnes`Y iatgmakes for an egpi inning board y rboutoour, ,, '. toudde4or + Plann/ng i'Olein'iSSlonel'S mµlit:' 1fi ria ;,..7444141..••••• r4i,' tr Irl I. • ' 401 • s••rr • • 1 4 4' i/2.1' PLY SCOP.D LOX U.0 AA Prt11-5 1E14. ASPI-I • FELr ..spm sHINGLa TAL DPP DC.,6" „ 4.) 4.1 CAI P S 06. PLY5.PD • e. 4" BLit- 9" 8L.K. coN.T. geiNfoacE° copa..Proonsc. 1444 9" CONC. LOCR i(b-10/10 MSc C.4.AVEL. FILL • ••••••••••••• WALL SECTION --- otirkw. DeP1 TO MEET CoDE RIGHT PI FVATION .111=••••••• ••••••••••••• ••• GO ••• • ••••••••• ea.. • •• • • •••••••••••.•••••••••••• eqpirpoo•••••••• 41•9••••••••01. • • ...e.g.. • - ••• wee. ••••••••••"••=n0E111.••••• • • •• •••••• 01••••• • MN •••••11••• •.•• • /Purim ••••• • • • wag • • ••• •••••• ••••••••••••••• •••••• 4. 17 41 re. . • • •••• •••••••••••• ••••••••• 111 ••=11D 00 .14 ••• ••••••••••• • •••• •••••• •••••••• • • • • • • •••• •••••• ONO Oa • •••••••=11 •••••=, • P... MO •••• • OP. Os • •••••••••• ex IMO.. OOP 11•••••••••• NO. 1111111111111111111110 Ni•••• •• ••• •• • r•• ••• •• 11•••••••••••••• • ••••••••••• •••••••• r.torn*•,/* ▪ •• IINIMISINEO o• • MO • • • 0*. o••••• War • • •• MM. .• ••• ••••• •••••••••••••• • • .....vq.vv•••••••.• ••••••••• •••••••• • GIMM. • ••••• ••••••••• MI•1110.. ••••• ••••••• • • ••••••••••1 • •• on. •••••••• •••••••• .O•P=. OEM= •••••• •• • • • ••••••••• •••••• •• • Oi•o••• • • • ••••••••• fp is 01101•1••••••• • • • • • •••••••I .1. • von ••11•1110..••• ••••••• •••••••• ••••• • onoomI OM • OM ••=/•••O•Ovon ••• ••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • rapv•••••• •• • • •••••• oro••• • • • • • MP • ••••• eon. •• •••••••••••••••=0 ••=1.••••••••• 1=110•• • •Oilmi,....••• •••••••11••••• • • • Pp. MINIM •• • • NO NNW • • ••=4••• • Ol••••••• •••••• OOP/ • 01•••0••••••••• •• • • 111•••=11••••••••••• ••••••• • M111•1111••••••••••• • IMOD • NINDIM=. • •••••••.• •• 1••••=• ••••••••••••••••••••• 00 OM •••••••• =MOO • •• 0•••••••••• • ...OMR • • • ONO • •••••••••=r • • •••• • ••••••• OD. • • 1••• • ••••••••••••/• •• •••••• • •• 1••••••••••••• ••••••••••• wog ••••• ••• •••••• •••• • • ••••••••• ro•voo o • ... IMMIDINIONOINFINION 11•=1••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••• • PIM. • •••••••••••••••••••• • ••••••••••••• 4114111.1411.11.140111.11111.6 •••••••••••• ••./g• fikoturEawnoti_ OP mif • ••• .0 • • 1 • IP 4...1 Rif/. 41444 • • • solo •• ••••• •••••• amr . • ••••••• ••• "4%44.,/ • • Ira" AIWA C4 71r• • • •• • •• MOJI ION • ACV' MED 16111 • r -L.! Jr 4- Liar 7 • 414-- /4 4 II 94 •••••••••••• •• •••••,.. • ,P4 a• 18 &dose& ait /0 Oa 4.... 0 11 u 41 4 r 111/11112 ;'1111111111111111121 111.11111.1111 r , 0 g • 41' • O. ItKr ?to. .1,r vr, • r rit• fr • t "14 44'4* .0rr „ 4 *'‘ /14 4. f, 44 ,1 ••• • • °N-------1 EIY 13.oQFIN6 fQ 1,14.15.1 ItYG 1 so Arlo pR E dirOlee.".... .�- .3 wOoG AI A it- /I, ick 1 506e •fl -1 Sobs ZXi2 6 X 6 PO r loPT NZ tn SJL TEP co �z 31f x5 Goois ISt( ►sane Ay pook L 24 2t.T C•R• orb 24 x'.o Z' - 4•" MO TI 0 N ACTT V1►Tk O 1.-1GMT 1 3z'-04 N 5 CAL 6 I/4"=I1-04 • -07:3a aNE Y1 121 Awal 1-4 ‘f OATS SCALA (/+,, .!/ o'' dos NO. OF 3 RMI8TI I.NIP NO. 1 OSA-1 OA *4 lotm DRAWN OHOOKOO 11111S5511111 MEEEPAIII JOU NO. SMOOT OP 3 OP4OOTO