The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000-08-14 CPC Packetf • ti • (a iliwater 141) THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, August 14, 2000, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of July 10, 2000 AGENDA 1 Case No V/00 -51 A vanance to modify a previously approved plan to convert a 3-season porch to a 4-season porch at 216 West Wilkins Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Marcia Kilbourne, applicant 2 Case No ZAM/00-1 A Zoning Map Amendment rezoning an approximately 12 acre area bounded by Melville Court and 72nd Street North to Lakeshore Residential (LR) from Agricultural Preservation (AP) Rick and Karen Reidt/City of Stillwater, applicants 3 Case No SUB/00-52 A subdivision of one 2 5 acre lot into two lots of approximately 9 and 1 6 acres located at 7155 Melville Court in the LR, Lakeshore Residential District Rick and Karen Reidt, applicant 4 Case No SUPN/DR/00-53 A special use permit, design review and vanance for a 170 room hotel, 3,014 square foot restaurant and 350 capacity conference center located at 606 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business Distnct Temtonal Pnson Coalition, Inc , applicant 5 Case No V/00-54 A variance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 2 inches proposed) for construction of access window wells at 838 West Willard Street in the RB, Duplex Residential Distnct Duane Ardnt, applicant 6 Case No SUBN/00-55 A resubdivision to increase lot size from 5,500 square feet to 9,250 square foot and a vanance to lot size requirements (10,000 square feet required, 9,250 square feet requested) for the construction of a duplex at 213 West Cherry Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Street Jean M Hamm, applicant 7 Case No SUB/00-56 A subdivision of a building into two condominium units at 150 South Third Street in the CBD, Central Business Distract Dianne Hark and Michael Rice, applicants 8 Case No V/DR/00-57 A vanance to the sign ordinance for an additional sign (two allowable, three requested) at 217 North Main in the CBD, Central Business District Joselyn Tilson, Valley Bookseller, applicant 9 Case No V/00-58 A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25'6" requested) for the construction of an addition to a garage at 718 West Churchill Street in the RB, Duplex Residential Distract Russell Hultman, applicant 10 Case No ZAT/00-05 A zoning text amendment allowing two familyre sidents in the Cottage Residential 411 Distnct, CA Contractors Property Development Co , Homer Tompkins, applicant Other items CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission July 10, 2000 Present Jerry Fontaine, chairperson Glenna Bealka, Russ Hultman, Dave Middleton, John Rheinberger and Terry Zoller Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent Robert Gag, Karl Ranum and Darwin Wald Mr Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval of the minutes of June 12, 2000, all in favor Case No SUP/00-37 A special use permit to change use of an existing nonconforming building from retail sales to mixed use at 215 N William (Valley Co-op) in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Country House Inc , Gregory Johnson, applicant Mr Johnson and Sara and Garry Gilberg, whose business will occupy a portion of the building, were present Mr Johnson questioned condition of approval No 3 regarding the trash enclosure Mr Russell stated a commercial dumpster would not be needed if trash is kept inside and taken out the day of pick-up Mr Gilberg questioned condition of approval No 2 requinng all space users other than his business be approved by the Planning Commission at a public heanng Mr Russell noted the property is zoned residential and a public heanng would be required to determine the appropnateness of use, once a specific use is decided on for the remainder of the building Mr Gilberg stated he is leaning toward residential use in the remainder of the building There was discussion as to whether a pubhc heanng would be required for residential use, and consensus was it would not Mr Hultman suggested changing the language of condition No 2 to require a public heanng for any uses other than the electncal contractor or residential The property owner at 214 N William asked about lighting Mr Gilberg stated there would be downht secunty lighting in the parking area, but lighting will be more reduced that is currently in use Mr Fontaine noted that neighbors must not see the light source Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval as conditioned with the amended language to condition of approval No 2 and eliminating condition No 3 if the trash is stored inside the building Motion passed unanimously Case No SUP/00-43 A subdivision to combine lots 20 and 21, Block 11, Churchill, Nelson and Slaughter's Addition into one lot of 10,800 square feet in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Scott Junker, applicant Mr Junker was not present Mr Russell stated Mr Junker owns both lots The subdivision request must before the City Council Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Middleton, moved to recommend approval of the subdivision as conditioned, all in favor 1 • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission July 10, 2000 Case No SUP/00-44 A special use permit to place a food concession wagon and/or popcorn wagon with outside eating at 314 E Chestnut St in the CBD, Central Business Distnct Mike and Sandy Hudson, applicants Sandy Hudson was present She stated she wanted to know what would be allowed before purchasing the property She said she would like to place tables and chairs and perhaps a vending cart on the site She said she plans to make the area look nice Mr Russell noted the Hentage Preservation Commission will review the site plans for landscaping and other design issues Mr Middleton asked about approvals for outside food serving, Mr Russell said that goes through Washington County Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval as conditioned, motion passed unanimously Case No V/00-45 A vanance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 3 '// feet requested) for construction of a 9x12' shed with a gazebo at 518 Dubuque St S in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Dannka Zizich and Steve Brown, applicants Mr Fontaine referred to the letter from Mr Seaquist in the agenda packet raising the issue of adverse possession and City Attorney David Magnuson's opinion, also in the packet, that adverse possession is not a valid claim in this issue The applicants explained that the shed is nearly 90 percent completed The structure was started 5 '/2 feet from the marker believed to be the property line, but when a survey was done, the property line was determined to be 1 '/2 feet to the east of where it was believed to be, thus necessitating the request for the vanance Mr Zoller noted that if the applicants hadn't had a survey done, the issue wouldn't even be before the Planning Commission Mr Russell said such issues are becoming more and more common in the older sections of the city, he said the City Council will be considenng whether to require a survey when a request is to construct a building is within 5 feet of the required setback Jim White, son-in-law of the neighbonng property owner, Gordy Handevidt, said Mr Handevidt want the structure to be in compliance with the 5 foot setback Mr Hultman asked Mr Handevidt if he knew where the correct property line was pnor to the survey, and Mr Handevidt responded that he did not Mr Fontaine noted the issue was one of miscommunication, and that the applicants had acted in good faith in beginning construction Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval for the vanance for the shed, motion passed unanimously The applicants also requested a 1 foot variance for construction of a gazebo on top of the shed Mr Hultman noted the gazebo could be moved over to be m compliance with the required setback, Mr Zoller noted the applicants could build a deck without a roof Mr Zoller, seconded 2 / • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission July 10, 2000 by Mr Fontaine, moved to deny the vanance for the gazebo Motion to deny passed 4-2, with Mr Rheinberger and Mrs Bealka voting no Case No V/00-46 This case was continued Case No V 00-47 A vanance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 12 feet requested) and side yard setback (5 feet required, 1 53 feet requested) for construction of a two -stall detached garage at 1342 S Third St , in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct John and Lisa Diedrich, applicants Mr Fontaine referred to the memo in the packet from building official Cindy Shifts regarding fire -proofing requirements for structures within three feet of the property line Mr Russell noted the proximity of the structure requires more fire protection and also precludes any openings on the north side of the structure Mr Zoller asked about drainage Mr Diednch said he planned a 1 foot overhang all around the garage, with gutters on both sides to bnng drainage to the front Mr Rhemberger moved approval as conditioned, with the added condition regarding the fire- proofing requirements Mr Middleton asked whether there should be an added condition requinng gutters on the east and west sides, Mr Zoller that wasn't necessary as one of the conditions is that all drainage remain on site Mrs Bealka seconded Mr Rheinberger's motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/00-48 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 28'6" requested) for replacement of an existing porch at 721 N Third St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct, Marley Smith, applicant Margaret and Marley Smith were present It was noted that all houses in the area are out of compliance with setback requirements The new porch will be exactly the same distance from the property line as the existing structure Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Rheinberger, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No V/00-49 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet requested ) for construction of a 2 '/2-3 stall garage at 721 S Greeley St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Steven and Nancy Breems, applicants Both applicants were present They stated the existing garage is 12 feet below street level, it is leaking and causing foundation problems It was noted that the new garage cannot exceed 1,000 square feet 3 • • • City of Stillwater Planning Commission July 10, 2000 Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval, eliminating condition of approval No 1 and adding a condition that the existing garage must no longer be in use Motion passed unanimously Case No 377 A review of a special use permit and possible modification to an existing special use permit for a self-service gas station with food market (approved m September 1980) at Croixwood Boulevard and County Road 5 in the CA, General Commercial Distnct Mr Fontaine said he had looked at the property He noted the back landscaping needs to be improved, some trash was scattered about, and the corner landscaping in front of the building has not been cared for Mr Russell said he has not received much cooperation from the property owner or the tenant in the past A letter from Steven May, president of Classic Home Designs, the adjacent business owner, mentioned five property maintenance issues Mr and Mrs Steve DeMars, 2307 Hidden Valley Lane, the residential property owners immediately behind the business, talked of ongoing problems Mr DeMars stated they had worked with Leo Miller, the city's code enforcement officer, in attempting to get the property owner into compliance, the DeMars have had to put up their own fence to screen the business view After discussion, it was consensus the most expedient way possible to get the issues addressed would be to have City Attorney Magnuson take legal action to gain compliance Mr Hultman, seconded by Mr Middleton, moved to direct Mr Magnuson to initiate legal action regarding code compliance, motion passed unanimously Other business • Mr Russell informed members that an informational meeting was scheduled for Monday, July 17, to receive input regardmg the Boutwell site, a site proposed for an active use park and public works building • Marc Putnam, representing Liberty on the Lake developers, was present to discuss a requested change in permitted use m one of the development's zoning distncts Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved to adjourn at 9 p m , all in favor Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 1 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-51 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 216 West Wilkins Street Comprehensive Plan District Duplex Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Marcie Kilbourne Type of Application Variance Project Description Request for 20' x 12', 240 square foot addition to existing nonconforming duplex Discussion The request is to enclose a three season porch (under construction) to convert it to a four season space used as a living room There are currently two approved units in the structure The front unit enters the unit from the street and occupies the first and second floors of the structure The second unit enters the structure from the east side and rear two bedrooms area located in the basement with a living room/kitchen The first and second levels of the unit enter through the side and contain a kitchen/dining area used as living room and three bedrooms on the second level Overall the unit contains five bedrooms and two baths Separate entrance to the lower level is provided through the rear The request is to add a 240 square foot addition to the rear unit This will increase living space but not sleeping accommodations A combined rear unit access is recommended to more clearly, physically connect the rear living space Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 A rear door to the rear stairs shall be added to the back (north) of the four -season living space Attachments Application and plans i • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Do 5 FEE Certificate of Compliance $70 Conditional or Special Use Permit $50/200 Design Review $25 Planned Unit Development* $500 Variance $70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Subdivision* $100+$5 Resubdivision $100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project al tv (ti (,J I LK i Assessor's Parcel No -SASc3 C IHAA) 6ETD Zoning District Z F-a.4iLy Description of Project T Lf- .SE Si() PO(?C,(-M "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify ! will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner/A C► A k I l v02 jE Mailing Address Z Ito (-) i) I (it) City - State - Zip Sri Telephone No (051 _(?z0 -2(0 2 Signature Ir 1 Representative Mailing Address j�� City - State - Zip )-j It% CSD/A Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) 4 x .1, Land Area $5137 . FT Height of Buildings Stories Feet Pnncipal Accessory Total building floor Area Jd/ Co sq ft Existing /O/lo sq ft Proposed -/(o sq ft Paved Impervious Area C) sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided-- 4" 171 Revised September 16,1998 r2eati 3i4 &,7,44em) • ..a90-ue, ./6 76 ?72a4 4D-D•"-i- A°"2'-'5 ,tea a y s_ea. ,"or.c.0 • • • 41 7' /3s'O 4149// H) 0 2 • ti • • / 2V.0". PF r /? L. L 4 /Lx22APE e,K /2 x20 /? &1 •'\ ti \\ZL `\ L\ z0 1 T //ovsE • a C.I -"/VI 7/ (10' PLar PLAT( 2/6 W G(J/Li-of/ s77L L I /A 7 /? • • 31/37 SG FT LOT /O /6 50 PT ExisT/NG (004) ;5.76SQ Fr G-AA'AGE .$ - TOTA L. sQ /= 7- c� Fr D&GK • • .14 '�tr..� cep' 4 n,, *}'*... ` 2 1: �-. ^ ...c- r4;i1 .'.�11,'.t._i t- £'`1iC a`izr,C. t, Al DEc K 1!✓IL/ ,N ST.4r T IS /DE talAAR a-1 \\ 12c &N.s'i,f/S (GN/ r) 2 2/ 6 /4/I L/4/4 / Ufi/T z _ _ �s 4 • MEMO • • To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Rezoning of +12 Acres of Land Lakeshore Residential, LR, from Agncultural Preservation, AP Rick and Karen Reidt and City of Stillwater, applicants Case No ZAM/00-01 Date August 10, 2000 The City received a request from the Reidt's to rezone and subdivide their 2 5 acre parcel into two lots (see SUB/00-52) A planning review of the Melville Court area indicates there are four additional lots of similar size and zomng as the Reidt parcel The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows a large lot single family (LLSF) designation Other lots along Long Lake are zoned Lakeshore Residential with a minimum 20,000 lot area This is the first application for rezoning in this area and it is staff's recommendation to consider the whole +12 acre area rezoning a this point (see attached map) In order to develop at that density, follow up subdivision would be required This may happen over time as individual property owners decide to subdivide We have received a letter from a neighboring property owner indicating their concern for the rezoning and describing protective covenants and easements that apply to the area These are pnvate agreements and do not directly effect City land use regulations There is also concern for increased taxes based on the rezoning The County Assessor indicates taxes would not increase because of the rezoning alone Subdivision would result in higher taxes A rezoning requires Joint Board approval Recommendation Approval Attachments Map 1 • • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED 1,11 Ioo—i Fees _Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance Design Review $300 $500 $70 $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any appl►cat►on All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 7 ( me \ v ` \\ CA 0 Zoning District Description of Project Assessor's Parcel No 30 030,201-1300/I 4 ` (GEO Code) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit if it is ranted and used " Property Owner k c —k — r c.v.% :. — Representative Mailing Address `1 l 5-5_ 1'Y1ci'-' t1e. c.4 1..., Mailing Address City - State - Zip s}'►' \ w a# r XV\ N S -2:3z City - State - Zip Telephone No 5-1 ` 14 o _Z�r i 4o Telephone No Signature Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area Existing Proposed Paved Impervious Area square feet square feet square feet square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \MCNAMARA\SHEILA\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 • • • To The Stillwater Planning Commission RE Zoning Map Amendment From Rick and Karen Reidt Dear Planning Commission Members, This letter is to update you on our plans to subdivide our property As you know, in March we proposed to subdivide our lot by creating two additional lots With respect to the concerns of our neighbors, we have modified our plans to subdivide our property into two lots rather than the three lots as we had originally proposed We believe that our current proposal will not have a direct impact on the remaining lots The new lot will not have a common border with the Irvine property (Lot 1) We plan to restrict the building site on the new lot to the location in the vicinity of the old garage currently on the property This building site will not be visible from the Irvine (Lot 1) or the Hof (Lot 4) homes The building site is also located as to have a minimal visual impact to the Koester property (Lot 5) given the location and the row of evergreen trees A row of cedar trees planted on the Northwest border will provide pnvacy for the Svendsen property (Lot 2) Enclosed is a map that depicts the new lot location We are requesting that the lot where our home is located remain zoned as Agncultural Preservation, AP and the new lot be zoned Lakeshore Residential, LR S ly, �n w�� ck an en Rei • Location Map SUMMER FIELDS GREEN 12480 LONG LAKh U 12550° R2OW R19W n2N BIN R22W R2IW R2OW Scale In Feet ZizeTr=outy Straw. aim Pool dal bend aA / • • • August 5, 2000 To Stillwater Planning Commission City of Stillwater .,. 2 1 6 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 From Nancy and George Hof Jo ''A\ Re Proposed Rezoning Amendment We are writing in response to Stillwater Planning Commission's notice of a proposed rezoning of the 12 acre Jackson Estates subdivision, and the proposed rezoning of Lot 3, 7155 Melville Court North, a 2 5 acre lot within the subdivision Lot 3 is owned by Rick and Karen Reidt Both requests are to change the status of Jackson Estates Tots from 'Agricultural Preservation' to 'Lakeshore Residential' designation The meeting notice, received August 3, 2000, regarding the inclusion of the 12 acre Jackson Estates in the most recent proposal for rezoning is of particular concern because it includes parcels not requesting action The inclusion of our property in a rezoning request with eleven days notice of a meeting and no information on the implications of rezoning does not appear entirely reasonable If, however, as a Commission you are determined to rezone, it is our request parcels not part of the request be excluded On March 13, 2000 we appeared before the Planning Commission asking the Reidt's initial request to rezone their 2 5 acre lot be denied On March 13 we expressed concerns regarding the commission's intrusion into the arena of deed restrictions and protective covenants forbidding further subdivision of lots within Jackson Estates We also voiced a concern regarding precedent setting actions by the Planning Commission in rezoning protected residential property within the city Other concerns included the environmental impact on Long Lake, the prospect of further requests for rezoning, and the importance of protecting a historic Stillwater property These concerns continue to be valid Therefore we continue to oppose the request for rezoning Enclosed for your review is a copy of page one of the covenants governing Jackson Estates and a copy of our response to the Reidt's most recent, July 17, 2000, request to subdivide their lot Because of prior commitments we are unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for August 14 It is therefore our request this letter be entered into the record Thank you for considering the issues raised in this letter cc Sue Fitzgerald Steve Russell 657576 • • • DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS George M _ Hof and Nancy K F. ," lusband and wife, be-ng the fee owners cr the prem.ses described as �� Lots One (1) through =_ve (5) .^c1us►ve, Block c1-J Estates, according to the -ecorded plat thereof do hereby declare and impose the `ol1ow_nS protective covenants restrictions and easements upo^ said prem.ses wnicn are to- t`e _ benefit of and appurtenant to said premises and each and ejer' lot described ARTICLE 1 LAND USE AND BUILDING TYPE C.-a, ac'<so No lot shall be used except for residential purposes No new building shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain on any lot other than one si^gle family dwell_na, not to exceed two and one -'gal' stories in he.sht one accessory bu.ld►ng, not to exceed :000 square feet in area a-d ore woodshed and one gazebo The accessor/ Duilding snag'_ oe constructed of the same exterior materials and st/le of the main structure The exte-_o- b..►d►ng materials a^d co?o'-s of .ne mair structure and tie accasso' , bu_1d.rg shall be ccmpatic..e zr ident4cal No earth homes, _og homes, dome nomes, 'oar tomes pole barn or other uncommon t/pe st-uctures or houses A__1 be allowed Only ..►r►te o ea*.t`-,-tone colors will be allcwec on exter_o- surfaces The gazebo 'rust be constructed as an .nzegral part of the landscaping and shall blend with the environment ARTICLE 2 ARC-1ITECTURAL CONTROL No building, pence or wall shall be erected, placed or altered on any lot unt.1 the pla^s and speci'-cat.ons and a plan showing the locat_on of the st-'_ct..-e re*1ce or wall, have been approved by the Arcnitectara_ Cort .J1 Comm4ttee as to Gualit' of workmanship and mate-_a1s harno--y or external des_g,, type of external building materials and oc_ors w_th ex_sti^g st-.ictur es and as to locate- 4it'' aspect to topography and r►n_s ' grade elevation Appro,.al sral_ De a3 =rCv►ded ..r oa-agr ai o A-t_cle 14 '^ereof • • • July 20, 2000 --)kk To Karen and Rick Reidt Jl� y From Nancy and George Hof Re Request to Subdivide 71 55 Melville Court Because neither of us is able to attend the meeting at your house on August 8, 2000, we want to let you know our intentions regarding the proposed subdivision of your property We will continue to support the onginal covenants on the properties within Jackson Estates Issues considered which lead to our decision include the following_ • If a subdivision of 7155 Melville Court takes place there is no guarantee further requests for subdivision will not be forthcoming from new or other owners This is a precedent setting action we do not support. Once started, such actions would be difficult to stop Covenants were put in place to protect properties from the type of high density development currently underway in Liberty, and at the corner of 72nd Street ana Melville Court • Further subdivision of 7155 Melville Court will inevitably lead to continued requests and pressures to develop the Svendson property These requests have included a recent phone call from Homer Tomkins offenng us $27,000 in exchange for removal of the clause in the Svendson deed restricting subdivision • Finally, we are committed to preserving the integnty of the histonc Jackson property We believe we have an obligation to all current and future owners - as well as to our own investment We appreciate your efforts to make your most recent subdivision proposal easier for us to accept, and hope you can understand, if not agree with, our decision We will not be supporting your request to amend the Covenants for Jackson Estates copies Deb Irvine Kathy & Scott Koester Randy Svendson • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/00-52 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 7155 Melville Court Comprehensive Plan District Agricultural Preservation Zoning District AP Applicants Name Rick and Karen Reidt Type of Application Subdivision Project Description Subdivide a 2 5 acre lot into two lots of approximately 9 and 1 6 acres Discussion The request is to subdivide an existing 2 5 acre lot (net) into two lots of approximately 9 and 1 6 acres each The current zoning is Agricultural Preservation, AP, requiring 10 acre lots This is a "holding" zoning for annexed land until rezoning This request requires approval of lot rezoning Case No ZAM/00-01 and Joint Board review Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 All drainage and utility easements shall be shown on the final lot survey as required by the City Engineer 2 A park dedication fee shall be paid 3 The subdivision shall require Joint Board Approval 4 The property owner must be rezoned for this approval to be effective Findings The subdivision meets the development regulations of the zoning and subdivision ordinances 2 52 t '1' BARN 1, rl 3 3 Act 8888co (o7 4/ To+ak I Aire] tq7 i l 1 / 3 5 Act i bovq. 888 8 NI eh�',,r it Ce 5Ac } Jro+a I Ames, I0 0 of r.ar `�J� 89�5�` t ��1 (/ ) V LING Ck A' • e MEMO • • To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Application for 170 Room Hotel with Conference Center and Restaurant Case No SUP/DR/00-53 Date August 10, 2000 Background Proposed The proposal is for a 170 room hotel with a 350 capacity conference meeting facility and 3,014 square foot restaurant Two -hundred and eighty three parking spaces are provided The site area is 5 41 acres The Temtonal Pnson site is on the National Register of Histoncal Places and the developer is renovating the structure to receive histonc tax credits following histonc guidelines The City's Histonc Preservation Commission review the request at their meeting of August 7, 2000, and recommended it for approval with conditions (see attached staff report) Analysis The hotel project has previously been before the City The previous hotel was for 129 rooms The conference center and the restaurant use is smaller Parking requirements for the mixed use project is 242 spaces 283 are provided The North Main Street Parking Lot with over 100 spaces is located across the street The developer and City are working together on a drainage plan for the site and area The pnson wall will be repaired as a part of this project No landscape plan is provided but will be needed when final site development plans are prepared The recently approved temtonal pnson park trail plan improvement should be coordinated with hotel site improvements and landscaping to the maximum extent The project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Plan Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 The utilities, grading, drainage plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer before building permits are issued 2 All conditions of the Design Permit as listed below are incorporated into this approval 3 The Temtonal Pnson trail shall be graded and landscaped as a part of the project development (paving by City) • • • Planning Commission Page 2 August 10, 2000 HPC Conditions of Approval 1 All hotel, conference center and restaurant signage shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC before project completion 2 The new building addition and site alteration shall be reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office for design and archeological impact approval before building permits are issued 3 An extenor fighting plan shall be reviewed by the HPC 4 Final site plan and landscape plan integrating the proposed use with the City of Stillwater perimeter interpretative trail shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC before project completion 5 All mechanical equipment shall be screened and noise buffered from surrounding residential areas as required by the City=s Noise Ordinance 6 Existing mature trees shall be preserved 7 A strong pedestnan connection shall be provided between Main Street and the front entrance to the building 8 Any extenor changes to the building shall be reviewed by the Planning staff and if deemed significant returned to HPC for review and approval Attachments Application and plans H P C APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/V/DR/00-53 • Heritage Preservation Date August 7, 2000 Project Location 606 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business Distnct Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Temtonal Pnson Coalition, Inc Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of the modified conceptual plan for a 170 room hotel, restaurant and conference center e • Discussion The onginal design approval given on 9/8/97 was for a 129 room hotel and 225 seat restaurant and a conference center Then on June 7, 1999, the concept was altered from hotel to office building Since then, the applicant has decided to go forward with the onginal concept of the hotel, restaurant and conference center They have added forty-one more hotel rooms by attaching a three story building to the north west side of the conference center/restaurant building The new building matenal is lap siding with a rock face concrete block base The new structure is behind the main pnson building A recently approved Temtonal Pnson Park and Trail Plan should be coordinated with site grading, drainage and landscape improvements Conditions of Approval 1 All hotel, conference center and restaurant signage shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC before project completion 2 The new building addition and site alteration shall be reviewed by the State Histonc Preservation Office for design and archeological impact approval before building permits are issued 3 An extenor lighting plan shall be reviewed by the HPC 4 Final site plan and landscape plan integrating the proposed use with the City of Stillwater penmeter interpretative trail shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC before project completion 5 All mechanical equipment shall be screened and noise buffered from surrounding residential areas as required by the City's Noise Ordinance 6 Existing mature trees shall be preserved 7 A strong pedestrian connection shall be provided between Main Street and the front entrance to the building 8 Any extenor changes to the building shall be reviewed by the Planning staff and if deemed significant returned to HPC for review and approval Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The request meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application form, letter and drawings 003/004 002/003 e,AGE 02 r1 r" 24 2000 M0N 16 26 FAX 605 399 0267 MCGARRITY - RICHARDSON N7 24 _UUU MON 14 08 rAA 651T690 5545 FINN DANIELS ARCHITECTS 37 24'200e 08 50 430881 CITY OF STILLw • • Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED 4Speciai/Conditional Use Permit Variance �Resubdrvision _Subdivision' Comprehensive Plan Amendment' $5D0 $3( 0 $5( 0 $2:""4 Zoning Amendment* _ _Planning Unit Development' .Dert,flcate of Compliance esign Review P)ess $$CLi .� $74/200 $1U 0 $100+ 0/lot °An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (I e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A sate plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION //jy Address of Project Mi rl ST Assessor's Parcel No./1Vg0YA)2D/ / Disirlc (GEO Coda) Zoning �D Description of Project ��L RACI6 o 4 1-irmS%- "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence submlffee herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct / furthe► certify l will comply with file permit If /t Is granted and used " Property Ownaral Representative LLC Mailing Address Aes.ve, r� . ,-pn City - State - Zip,7I72/S_ ilf/ ss-you-y)-A Telephone No 6/2- _ 2i-34/ rf Signature G SITE AND PROJECT DESCR1PY1ON Lot Size (dimensions) x =apt-- Total Budding floor area 115, 442- square feet Land Area 10 VI Auuss -town., rareL a►rt s4( Existing `7-7 47:1, square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed jl F,, 44z_, square feet iihoaq Principal 454' Paved Impervious Area 121,4.15square feet ip.a,,,oao Accessory _l _ Zlo No of off-street parking spaces 2a� (2,6o4 e, RooMe,J 3 li wtCNAMARkSHEILA'PLANAPP.FkM June 22 2000 RADISSON HOTEL & CONFERENCE CENTER 606 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA PROJECT DIRECTORY OMER B RC N.1.08 LLC CA4Rl A Y@ 500 51N STRICT TONERS 50 SCUM 51N STRUT M1EAP0.T5 MN 55402 OANER'S GARRITY A CNM050N LLC REPRESENTATIVE 909 SI JOSCPN STREE 6600 0. B0A 62 (RAND C(O(T)AC 1 td 6NCTIAA(A CON (6600SS) 399 000 E' (TwALSWIE) GENERAL CONTRACTOR IOAUS ANDERSON 200 WAND AMC 5 PAM. N 55 01 CI%IIM 01 AC • BEI ( (655))) 290-6 20 (((AACTORL0) AR0IIRCT NM DANE W0 5i1RNR SUITE 701 S A1R LN 55 (L91) 1. DAN OEM 5(65) 690 5525 55A5 (690 rAACSWRE) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OV2 ENGINEER 4501E J011 SON A SOL ERMAN I 3 NE1D4 N 50701 5011M WO1AP01451N 55406 COH CT RO1 401615(7( ((6 2)611 6 50 SOLI) (6 1107 6305 (r CSONE) DARR 00 1110NC CO919A11 IDO T45 771N STREET 9991E000.1155 b1 55 35 4803 CON AC STEW N (5' 632 eo ((M0C621TU) SYMBOLS LEGEND DETAL V pA1 Ma TAAt Re ELEVATION A NA `Tw O lea Va. 91A Ma ROOM NANE/N0. en No 00131AL NOTE o Fe DETAL TITLE OFLOOR P AN Illarii!u i u I !:Sti 2 I 1 7 A SOIL/EARTH BITUWNOUS SAND R10D INSUL BATT INSUL CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK 1 • REVISION KILME 1 A HEW OT10 O o EXIST ORD a6N ELEVATION BENCH RORK PARTRION TYPE i" v%%i =�r 1a/ia ineeee BRICK STONE LUMBER PLYNOOD FINISH N000 METAL ACOUSTIC TILE GENERAL NOTES All 00491RUCNM SNAIL CONFORM 10 ALL COOTS APPIICABLE 1 MT THE Cr TERM ISSUANCE M149 L 001011095 OF 1195 C01R1AC N 00P114N A-10 MALL BC WC AR Cr THESE 000114NR B AULTONCI. 6060.1 1 ATIMAI.14MRAL A 9060D1 CONTOAC ORS 0 PROVDE LTTONRNCEL a TO ALL CWM 015 AN RE910140. 01 09 NAM A141 Tor O 7N09 OM PtMAT5 UCRNSES A10 NSLNANCES COTIRAC101 91AI COMM. TT on R. WRf111 C000a5 AND 014149015 ClEO N MESC 00000*15 ALL 01SC6E ANOES SNAIL BE BROOM TO R4 LTC ON Cr 158 0•LC !MDR TO AN C0(SEOVE RAL TR:R DRAWING INDEX INDEX T I TIRE MEET NRVEY CIVIL 0-1 PAVF]OET DESIGN 69 URDES ARCHITECTURAL A-L1 A-21 M29 A9, A-9.4 A-9.6 A•26 A-27 A.21 A-82 M71 A 3.4 MSD A-41 A-42 A-43 ML4 DI 0( 2 EN S AENI17E01131AL SRI PLAN OVERALL BULD00 PLAN BOLES A FLOOR RAN LEVEL 1 M D00 A FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 9 01005 A FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 9 OULD00 A FLOOR PUN LEVEL 4 BLLm10 V FLOOR PLAN BUDD'C FLOOR PLANEEV0.8 L A 4S 0E70ICA ELEVATIONS BILONO A E7(1EAOR ELEVATIONS BULONO A 0(10LO0 DEVATIONS IA1L1 LEO T5' EXT00061 ELEVATIONS HALO BEVATION BLOW UPI BUDNO SECTION • BIODNO A EAST HALF SUDNO SECTION 6 BUID5(0 A NEST NALP 07.03N0 SECTION O BUD6(0 7F 8111:00 SECTION 6 MEMO C BULLED A 089TN0 BOOR RAN MAN LEVEL BULONO A E10S1N0 FLOOR RAN MD LEVEL I UPPER LEVEL BLOOMS 40 069TII20 FLOOR RAN STRUCTURAL 8-1 FOU:ATKN FRET FLOOR FRAMNO RAN MUM A 8-9 BECO0 FLOM FRAM% RAN BUDFO A 8-3 MUD ROOK FIRAAOO PUN BUIDIO A 8-4 8-6 841 8-7 3-8 FOURTH ROOK FRAA0D PLAN BU DMD A ROOF FRALMO PLAN RADOA A Fl7UDATON RAN BUDO(0 W ROOF FRAFOO PUN BULLED F FORCATIOI(L RU15OD PLANS BULDNO'C KEY RAN FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIOTL 0'1 20 00 • P.a.. R1 N ]V Tr4 10.457 0.1 Or TITLE DIO N T-1.1 M rall s .tole Ralf e„m.ume e.r /_,r of Immortal Am..) n...�e._. Nab 4 / z L I , a I If - c =I o u "Peal Cr c crri Si k✓1 I I ftr§ e � . t carol srNu cNau+t s ny ^ it $ f 1de ;144l L. _ a >iI TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Lot 1 Block One Terrf.tori.al Prison Addit%on � Part Of /Pormar dHn ssolartal Stillwater Minnesota on Cans) I__. wr w arr.r.__..rn...r err %Mr �_rw_p.rM ww An01 ❑ON 1° r Ns not. so 04.....1 r N Mom,,,,, \---. , ogoNAL to sow e ,9 tie� r ATI I or 1 II Ns, t}eeman. Dnpay & Associates Inc Uno 8MVEYIN WEIF44..._ r � tYOM1110.50 Noe 0 en -test v ur r.A 5010001111 REPaT r_�_...r.r..l.,n.. r. .2117. NO713 meteptqa MO InIKSI WAIN. RI FA e WM. o.°....mWR! OW 1202ffa .M • l._e N. — Ir — W nn. Awl My N. H/.ao • • • SRR 64 21 Ir _ 149 1 West Elm Street 0 • to Z � o 0 t a lA -'b S8r54 21 N O x 149 89 • 15718 S62.29 85 4O 25 54 �� C 1. 6 9S70de 5( A. 890 SBdV3 �hq p A4,0 45 2( SBO 67 , y North First Street ) S8 2i N East — s5 8 A I25 J7 , m o P..mw SOUS 9T.1 BE r WOK ( Mtn sow I16 1,03r1 n®m-c 1a1 1. loran. OF IDIF0111 MOD aDTT1n COMB DO ,tea 1aI. game Mr.cw,T3111 DOUT.TTO „an, (WONT Sa Ax ) Ta t run or smut. Su.ID COrDreTTOTURD Ira a BS TO 001 Or OM.rIMOTTOTT°DOM 11110.f THE lovDI .a. sau a C0#*,rn To loss STAMM PROVED ODOR 1T9.OTw MOM satyrs (upw Sao 003, ) THE TOP MT Q 93110aa gas a TO 5U/4M00 ODOR MD 9s1s) Y TOOT. COMM Cr MD 01O506 .1I TO w01 O 406 TOT* D.11 MO corm Tn011! 13. ITr Not 0 D.T1 a amm D. w 0D1 R Coo TO cnw. r MOT Dm 46*CXT �P"TJ L."wr. S79•65 2z 6, NB)•!0 8%,g S60 SI% VQel `pit.• t EpgA -113 sr Km coast. ML ,idler O¢ y IDWITENT OD m11 . 0r0 TM 6300 ,.a COO NIX 11DX0ROODE OTT T.AT Sao C00.0 TO 0m O S9x0901 PROCTOR 01191, m NOD 1 1a CaO.LTOI 11111013ADITS fDA OA XSOP wpm, TMT 0.0611 NU* nor su ON /r r WM ITPI O 13 DT r um - AGO DM Sm. IOT. row 0019i DT 9R axon am1 06 DET.o 610310.11 .1 OPAraDrt No w FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING ONLY NOT FOR CONSTROCIT01 111 "go lig! 11� 1 I C-) W it L 7 1 I CD CY z z a 2 z 3 op TO F to TOP. w —1133 IrT1 T1.1Ya — — PAVEMENT DESIGN C-1 • • p H Z 133�g5� 0 ■ oa0o5 Lo�aS 90' 1c F �1�cN ffi 1 °Iv NO North _ 472 Ma n Street — Trunk oe k HI9h way W.16 wlJ I SOM North Second Street SO51829 E 95 We 82 4w N00 99 2EW � o roa' a / _ ft 1011 N00.97 49 W North First Street I r NA. I Or i FIR SIBA1VNV 3000 9 a ili I ` { 118 Radlsson Hotel & Conference Center 808 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER MINNESOTA ........ ,„ liaii f�aruels f I_r.a-snerrA-crre aue rare w`.v srt• —. a am �..... M. 1 0 AOf000 IM 000 ELS 0400ITERI. [DC m O m 0 m O 0 0 0 0 0 ®©©©O ©e ® O a! rill; .1; m_$ :II G 11 sp 31 Rc a 1 b 1 ii 1 a a1 s R i R di. 94a $ e€9 se sR 6 1' I sa a a9I11 sa alp 1 1 1 9gff pRa 0! 1 1f3 : pegl: 1i1 1i a111 2: g Asa' d a R i if R Ev ! [c ii%1 lE R 1 S aA s is i a i s l 1 p 7 i it i i a as a. g1 g 9 1 Q i p 114 / i I$X Fp` A! 4 9 055 IT R 9 a 79 R 1 1 a b R I 16i1 as D i 1 li b£ ' a IR 3 a ay v 44 " " a e R e 1 i 1$ go € 1 � g i as C E 1 !! E ea 1 t $ 15 11 la 1 1' € '. i 9 a p 0 1 n ! b R1 go 1 ! _ 1 a1 E1 '! a a; 6 1 ea t $ a "5 1" r i s R i 5 v 9 s O m 3 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 5 R 7, s pi3 pt7 pi s p f " • 1 • i 1: :1 lig t II! a1! I1 t 11 5 R a 19 fe 1 p1@:;1 •pl.� sy1 15 1 1 a Ip b11 b 1 1 1 1 gig1 @e 1'1 e $ 61 g IR 1 1 Fg 5 1 IA 11 i 9 p1 li q1 it ap i a P11! e� b,x�15p1�1 1 S 1 a $1 El "# aI, al'� "I 0 9i li l5 1 1 ao li o a 11 P 1 1i 11I11/ 11li11 � 1114 1R9e 1$ a �Pl: 11E11 11 1 R 1 1 0 ©0 0 ©0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; la i E i 1 ; it 7 1'1 it 11 q'1 tl Aal l 'gas 1 1 5 39i6 r Ci i ii! 111 / Z 5 ! �1a l 4 �! ay 1p A1s 1 !p s 5j L f C -ea 1 1 1 1 R: 1: 1 1iaia ':s 1 1 t1 1 € t o ! 1 1, i 5 b s 1 q 1i t 1 g 1; 1 1 1 1-Q 1 1 ii a 1 1 a s a 1 1 e 1 Ili ill`4 R t o 1 1 p! E t8 1 a 5 5 1 1, a pi e a6a @ P 1E a E 9 n P 1 i 1 Sat g $ 6"1 a 1 � $ G/ D 0 55y2 ,1S a ,r3 a3 13 p o aft Ili pJ 4 • , 4iY,hk• S I , k1/' - i ba 1 ha r i ! # E ' 9F' � jl .i rt ; I111 j,$) eiti f4-ria r t �I h r A i- -. „�e' t � 1 1 1I ift ,, e1 1�4tiY'e'i _ T 111= 1 IMOI 410 1T'S'f.`I'TTI� Al 9� tie 8 ay. TITTT C 7 1 1- 1 F1 Ye l s it UI11i0 BM Egp ):13 IIEEED 4 Ili 0 rrr err [1:543M ME CM rIOs$r"3 $pda F J 1 �o $ ga E 0 I 1 1 r �, I t " Radlsson Hotel & Conference Center BOB NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER. MINNESOTA I. Finn daniels zdal 00 0. 0. PaLd. �� ta MIN �P°= MAW �..w..sr+rea. rs • 11 BUILDING A t1 w i 111 111 u 111 11 NORTH ELEVATION ° B U I L D I N G ill EAST ELEVATION w fri iii nil' I.11'.9$ le 0-14-13 ITS n1 11� ED fnl 111 ).w co 111 BSI 1 F�3x1 i L c4 r s r 7.-ee(• ryF�'ryy brr9 ' ' �• 11 111 111', y vim. 4. • ti � f iii 11 ' Prep 1"1,1X u'I 1�1. 1111 1111 lN1 --® FOR PRELIMINARY PRILOIC. ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRIIGTION. 012000 40 iI 111 1u�1' 111 u1 111 BUILDING A WEST ELEVATION 1 Per II k Li] 1 Radisson Hotel & Conference Center Prep" ``-- - craw ORLOOR ELEVATIONS A-3.2 w • • n .1 3 0 /i A 1.0 0.1 u uro. CCTS IK @ c 0 to c yr 0 z a m r m 0 c — 0 z 0 m r m D 0 X. P 43 13 O o W 1 r x=� 1 Radisson Hotel & Conference Center SOS NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA fiaui Daniels n0e Pad .w..r. eve. am mm�wueW --- — 4.......... a.. aaaa..0..as MVO d riPSS 1.II 1111 1111 111 Ou SOUTH ELEVATION BLDG C v. 11111 INN 11✓11 11'1 o 0 OU NORTH ELEVATION BLDG C YP • \, uAr V4 0 FOR PRELIMINARY PRICING ONLY NOT FOR CCNSTRICTIOL 01 20-00 xA - Jf . i. i Tin iY[ ilT:Tite._., ,....-..ti:iY.l12b :Th u, u O WEST ELEVATION BLDG C P NE a 11i 111 .+M es n- 4� D. h woe ma BUILDING'C NLNVATIONB A-3.4 r 0 0 m 2 Sm 0 0 z CB CD 0 A ilm 0 2 0 II r t 1{.:d kyyV�� E1 t I L W14 / II + /Vw, 1 IrI Il�sp 1, I C ' CI808 Radisson Hotel Conference Center NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA M-�= m ; �el � aa+ 410uavn eooesde Mr... %a ..�mnme.rer+.m i 1 to 1 I 1 1 i i •1 1 1 • TA„Al , 7y4(/p' ,. - /Z (S (-1,,(1 Issues Analysis Archaeological Issues In developing a plan for the reuse of the Territorial Prison site, the consulting team analyzed a number of key issues which affect the preservation and devel- opment of the property These included archaeological, environmental, owner- ship, open space, interpretation, and lands use issues The Territorial Pnson site presents a unique archaeological opportunity to study temtonal lifeways at a site that has been spared from major modern develop- ment While a pnson is not representative of common residential patterns, many activities camed out at the site may be representative of activities found through- out the region This would include dietary patterns, building construction methods, manufactunng techniques, sanitary systems, and the like The onginal buildings of the Temton al Prison occupied the southeastern portion of the site beneath the current entrance road These buildings were torn down in 1871 and no subsequent construction besides the roadway took place at this location There is a good chance that building foundations and artifact deposits remain intact beneath the road Areas with high archaeological potential to study early pnson life and other Post - Con tact Period problems include the manufacturing complex areas in the north- ern and western portions of the site, the prison complex in the southeastern part of the site, the kitchen -laundry complex along the east wall and the hospital site in the north -central part of the site Foundation rums of many of the buildings are surficially apparent at the site especially in the southern and western portions Native Amencans lived in the Stillwater area for at least 10,000 years prior to white settlement and the Prison site was no doubt occupied many times by a variety of Indian groups The 1839 battle is said to have involved a Dakota attack on an Opbwe overnight camp Although the Prison site was landscaped several times in the 19th century, much of this landscaping probably involved filling which would help preserve abonginal archaeological deposits The 1870 Ruger panorama shows numerous small dwellings occupying the hollow to the north and west of the original pnson These are homes of early Stillwater settlers Structural and arh factual remains of this residenhal complex may also be preserved beneath the site The archaeological remains not only offer opportunities for archaeological research into the state s past, but offer nch interpretive opportunities The Indian past, Tern tonal settlement, early manufacturing history, and prison life could all be interpreted at the site with active archaeological digs providing an attractions centerpiece The one-story warehouse building could beused asbothan interpre- tive center and an archaeological laboratory 1 17 • • Environmental Issues Ownership Issue 18 Because the site is such a rich storehouse of archaeological remains, no ne construction should be permitted on the site without pnor archa testing in areas to be disturbed eologi� Ideally, an archaeological reconnaissance survey should be undertaken to bett define and evaluate the archaeological potentials of the site The costs for Six a survey would probably range between $5,000 _ lustoncal ante $10 000 Because the site'gnty is so dependent on the entire parcel of land encompassed b the prison walls, it is likely that any new construction would have an advers, affect on both the physical remains and the setting itself It is likely that the StatE Historic Preservation Office would o existing buildin ppo� any new construction ou tside of the gs with the possible exception of surface parking lots and necessary roadways The Prison site housed a number of industnal uses over time, some of which could have contanunated the ground and/or remairung buildings If the site is polluted the type and amount of contamination would have to be determined and the method for mitigation will deterrrune the market value of the site Although there has been a good deal of debate about who ultimately will be responsible for any polluhon clean-up the bottom line is that before the City or any other new owner considers acquisihon the property should be evaluated for possible contaminants This evaluation should include information on the cost of clean up the duration of any effort to purify the site, and a legal evaluation on who is responsible for the restoration A Phase I & II EPA evaluation should begin to answer these questions In addition to the invisible contarrunahon that may exist on the site, there are visual pollutants at the Prison site Until recently, the Prison site had been somewhat isolated visually from Stillwater's downtown However with the growth of commercial tou ism to the north along Main Street, the Prison site has become more connected, and more noticed In its isolation and industrial/ warehouse use by Maple Island, it was used for some outdoor storage Al- though, not a serious problem, the storage area should be cleaned up It is almost essential that the owner, Maple Island be a willing participant in the evaluahon process (I say almost because there is an exception to be discussed later) Only with a willing seller and a realishc askin economic recommendahons be developed g price can feasible Maple Island presently uses the buildings on the Pnson site for storage A portion of the factory building is in turn rented out for repair of school buses • MEMO • (-eztA //-171.M 44/1- 7/14-cypet-KL-fiy /1 To Mayor and City Council From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Trail Plan for Temtonal Pnson Date Apnl 28, 2000 ti- Background In January, the City Council authonzed the preparation of a Temtonal Pnson Trail Plan to provide guidance for construction dunng project development and stormwater drainage improvement construction and information to present to the state legislature for possible funding Mr Cain was able to use early versions of the plan for presentation to the legislature In developing the plan, input was received from the Planning Commission, Histonc Preservation Commission and Parks Board The Parks Board approved the plans at their meeting of Apnl 24th, 2000 The Temtonal Prison developer's representative was at the Parks Board meetmg to review the plans With the plan in place, it may be possible to include phases of plan improvement, funding, landscaping, paving, etc as part of site work The owner of the Temtonal Pnson site will maintain the trail and landscaping after construction Recommendation Approval of Temtonal Prison Trail Plan Attachment Plan • • • Minnesota Territorial Prison Interpretive Information When the first Minnesota Territorial Legislature convened at St Paul in 1849, they placed the Capitol there, the University at St Anthony, and the Pnson at Stillwater At no time is it recorded that Stillwater had a "choice" of either the Pnson or University Construction of the prison began m 1851 with $20,000 appropnated from the Federal Government It was constructed at the North end of Stillwater m a ravine known as "Battle Hollow " The area got that nickname because of a fierce battle between the Dakota and Ojibwa Nations m early July 1839 The prison was completed in 1853, and its first Warden, Frances R Delano, moved into the Warden's House Delano's administration was extremely corrupt Escapes were numerous and prisoners were let out of prison when counties failed to pay the amount of money to keep the prisoners incarcerated Because of this, Frank Smith took over as Warden in 1858 Smith, however, resigned the post just a few months later, and Henry N Setzer took over and served until 1860 During the 1850s, the convicts were few, and to identify them, the convicts simply had their heads half shaven However, when John S Proctor took over as Warden, he instituted the "penitentiary stripes" to the inmates for proper identification The prison began to fill as more and more people came to this "new" area known as Minnesota By the end of Proctor's tenure as Warden, the Prison was passed its maximum capacity, and an appropriation of $14,500 was given to the pnson for enlargement A series of Wardens came and went at the Stillwater Pnson from 1868 to 1874 Henry Jackman, who was appointed Warden in 1870, oversaw the largest smgle expansion of the Pnson It was a $74,000 expansion that mcluded more cell blocks, machine shops, and wood shops Another $5,000 of improvements followed just a couple years later makmg the prison basically a city within the ravine On August 3, 1874, Warden John Abbott Reed was appointed He served one of the longest terms as Warden, 13 years Reed was a Civil War Veteran, a State politician, and came from Blue Earth County, Mmnesota Albert Garvin took over as Warden in 1891 He was the first Warden to be appointed that had any prison work m his background He left the post the following year becoming the Pohce Chief of St Paul Henry Wolfer replaced Garvin Wolfer, who also had pnson experience, quickly became known as the leading penologist m the county He tned his hand at reform, instead of just punishment • • • The old prison finally became to small for the need to house inmates So m 1914, a new prison was completed just south of Stillwater m what is now Bayport The remaining convicts from the old prison were chained together and marched down Stillwater's Maui Street to the new facility The old prison was left to rot and decay In 1936, a National Youth Administration Project torn down most of the prison buildings and the stone was used to line the Mississippi River banks to fight the erosion problem Two buildings were spared The Twine Factory and its warehouse were not torn down, but used for storage The State then sold the buildings and land to Maple Island Dairy Co in 1941 That same year the State signed over the old Warden's House to the Washington County Historical Society, and it is now a county museum The prison site was again sold m 1996 to the City of Stillwater In turn, the City plans to lease the site to two developers who will restore and renovate the old historic buildings and create inside, a 100+ room hotel and convention Center The grounds are planned to be groomed and a hnstoncal walkway within the old prison walls WARDEN HENRY WOLFER THE "MODERN" WARDEN Wolfer began his prison work m Joliet, Illinois in 1872 He moved on to several other prisons, and then he became a deputy warden at Stillwater in 1885, and served in that capacity until his appointment as warden in 1892 He was born at Munith, Michigan on March 23, 1853, the son of John and Sarah Wolfer He was educated at the common schools and at a commercial college in Joliet, Illinois Wolfer believed in the good time law, that is, a prisoner could take time off his sentence by doing "good" time, not breaking rules or otherwise getting in trouble He believed that the convicts should try to use their time behind the walls of Stillwater's prison to educate and make themselves better The Warden worked endlessly after the turn of the twentieth century to have a new prison built The old prison was crowded and falling apart The ventilation and dampness of the old limestone buildings were taking its toll, on the moral of the guards and the health of the convicts With appropnations from the State Legislator m 1905, 1907, and m 1909, Henry Wolfer set out to create the most modern prison m the Umted States In 1914, the "new" prison was entirely occupied, and it was lauded across the country as the prison of the future With his job seemingly done, Wolfer resigned as warden in October 1914 He became known across the county as the leading penologist in the United States He retired to Long Beach, Cahforrua with his family • • At Northfield the citizens rallied and squashed the robbery attempt Although the James Brothers escaped, the Youngers were captured two weeks later and pled guilty to Murder m the first degree They were sentenced to hfe imprisonment at the Stillwater Prison and entered the facility m November 1876 While m the Stillwater pnson the Youngers conformed to pnson disciplme and were model prisoners Only after eight years m prison, the Youngers were given weapons to help escort other prisoners from the fire that engulfed the cellblocks m January 1884 In 1887, it was the Younger Brothers who helped establish the prison newspaper called the "Mirror " Cole Younger was for a short time the assistant editor of the paper The youngest brother, Bob, completed his hfe term m September 1889 when he died of TB The other two, Cole and Jim, were two of the first hfe convicts m Minnesota to be paroled They were let out of pnson m July 1901 Jim Younger died m 1902, but Cole was given a conditional pardon m 1903 He returned to Missouri and became a born again Christian, he wrote is autobiography and toured the country lecturing on how crime doesn't pay Cole Younger, the last of the Wild West Outlaws, died m Lee's Summit, Missouri m 1916 at the age of 72 Father Solanus Casey, Capuchin He was born Bernard Francis Casey in Prescott, Wisconsin on November 25, 1870, confirmed in Stillwater, he became a part-time guard at the Minnesota Prison He later worked as a street car motorman in Stillwater then moved to Supenor, Wisconsin where he found his calling In 1896, at the age of 26, Casey entered the Capuchin Order, receiving the name Solanus He was ordamed a priest July 24, 1904 m Milwaukee, Wisconsin and celebrated his First Mass on July 31, 1904 The first twenty years of his priesthood was spent m the New York City area He was assigned to St Bonaventure's Friary m Detroit, Michigan, in 1924, remaining there until 1945 During this period his reputation of holiness spread far and wide After ten years in Huntington, Indiana, he returned to Detroit where he died on July 31, 1957 His last words were "I give my soul to Jesus Christ " • • • On December 2, 1919, Wolfer was driving to an oil field near Atascadero, Califorma, to investigated investment opportunities While attempted to pass another vehicle, the car Wolfer was driving went off the road, rolling over The two other passengers were slightly injured, while Wolfer was crushed by the steering wheel, and was killed instantly Prison Fires of 1884 The first fire took place on January 7`b and broke out in the Northwestern Car Company shops mside the pnson The buildings that caught fire, which were only fifty feet away from the prison cellblocks, included pattern shops, hardwood and softwood shops and the engine room Gus Lmdahl, a night watchman, discovered the blaze but was unable to extinguish the fire After the fire department arrived and the fire was finally put out, about 300 men lost their jobs and the damage was estimated at nearly $300,000 The fire that occurred on January 25, 1884 reached into the cellblocks, and although not as much damage would occur, the threat of the loss of lives loomed larger than it did before This is where the Youngers would be tested As the fire was raging that night, Warden John A Reed told his deputy to gather twenty- five of the most trusted pnsoners they had and arm them so that they could help escort the other convicts out to safety Among these twenty-five were the Younger Brothers The next morning had the Stillwater militia, Company K, on hand to help relieve the guards and help with the clean up of the fire's aftermath Additional help came from the St Paul militia, Companies C & H The following day after the fire, the Youngers were taken to the Washington County Courthouse and placed in the county jail After the fire was put out and the convicts counted, only one did not answer the call A search of the cellblock uncovered convict Henry Lempke dead of suffocation m his cell Lempke was known to have "periodical fits of insanity" and was found on the floor of his cell with the door open He was from Germany and buried in Fairview Cemetery m Stillwater Younger Brothers During the Civil War and outlaw band of raiders headed by Quantrill road through the rmddle part of the Nation Branded as war criminals, all those who road m the group where hunted down as outlaws well after the war was over Among those m the group were Frank and Jesse James, and their close friends, Cole, James, and Robert Younger The two sets of brothers robbed banks and trams in the 1860s and 1870s and their crime spree brought them to Northfield, Minnesota m September 1876 • The Prison Wall and Caves The ongmal prison was a three story stone structure surrounded by a lugh board fence This did not change for over a decade Then as more convicts were mcarcerated m the facility and the more escapes that were made, a call by the warden and the prison inspectors went to the Minnesota Legislature to construct a stone wall In 1867, the plans for new walls around the prison where begun The wall near the warden's and deputy warden's homes on the south side of the pnson grounds would remain unchanged for the time being, the rest of the walls would be removed and "a substantial stone wall around this enclosure would cost ten thousand dollars " The stone would come from the nearby quarry Just north of the prison site itself This plan did not get the attention of the state legislature and m 1868 the Annual Report of the Inspectors of the State Pnson stated "The walls surrounding the yard are in many places about falling down, and a part was removed a year ago, and the yard extended by enclosing it with a plank fence The whole should be removed and replaced with a substantial stone wall, and to take down the present walls and old office and rebuild them so as to enclose the entire yard in a substantial manner, thirty thousand dollars will be required " In the Warden's Report of the same year, he mentions that "the duties of Deputy Warden and Guards are exceedingly onerous, under the present situation of the wall and board fence around the Prison yard, that on the north side being nothing but a board fence By 1871, nothing was done with the prison wall The Warden reported that although much construction was being done at the pnson, he states that "all this has been accomplished with nothing but a plank fence enclosing the yard, and while the yard was bemg enlarged, we were sometimes -- at some points -- without any fence " Finally in 1873, the legislature appropriated $40,000 for the building of 520 fee of wall, with gates and grated windows This only did a partial job and the Warden and the pnson inspectors requested the legislature to continue the process One solution was to cut mto the bluffs, making a sheer cliff as one part of the wall This was later done Warden John A Reed in his report to the legislature in 1874 wrote "In regard to the old crazy fence that surrounds a portion of the yard, it is only necessary to say that is still stands there, and if we have no high winds or freshets may last another year " The stone wall is finally finished in 1892 A httle more than ten years later Warden Henry Wolfer makes a call for the state legislature to start setting aside money to construct a new prison In 1914, the last of the prisoners from the Stillwater prison are transferred to the new facility in South Stillwater • • • • The front wall [east] is torn down m the 1920s, and the stone prison buildmgs torn down by the National Youth Administration in 1936 Battle Hollow Interpretive Information Battle of 1839 This event created the nickname for the ravine in which the prison was built as "Battle Hallow " This is a documented Native American battle site m which 21 Chippewa braves were killed and another 29 injured Other possible Ideas National Youth Administration This group that was formed to put youngsters to work during the depression is the group that tore down the main prison buildmgs in 1936 / PRISON HISTORY INTERPRETIVE ,3-: i/--/ n • • • CAVE INTERPRETIVE • • • ' i?''#. WALL INTERPRETIVE I • • • PRISON CELL BLOCK INTERPRETIVE • PRISON CELL BLOCK INTERPRETIVE_ • • i `s^11 r d 1. ,-. Z___,-7L__________ /------\c-------T,F— 2/--- --\ ziri/s-ri)c-b-IT-4$,c \ .....r........, ......7...-.-........-. BATTLE HOLLOW INTERPRETIVE • } • ___ JK, ___ • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-54 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 838 West Willard Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Duane Arndt Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance t the side yard setback (10 feet required, 2 inches proposed) for construction of access wmdow wells Discussion The applicant has remodeled an 1880's barn that had been converted to a duplex m 1918 A partial basement was put under the structure at that time The latest remodeling mcluded constructing a full basement under the building The buildmg documents show three windows m the basement The applicant states m his attached letter that the windows comply with the building code access requirements Mr Arndt continues m his letter that the State Code requires a wmdow well that is at least 3 feet by 3 feet This statement is true accordmg to the city building official if sleepmg rooms are located in the basement There are other floor space arrangements that would not require the variance, or wmdows relocated to other basement locations Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the followmg conditions of approval 1 A Certificate of Survey shall establish the property lines with corner markers, and be approved by the Community Development Director before a n occupancy permit is issued Recommendation Demal Fmdings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties m the same district and m the same vicinity, and that a f • • • variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and mtent of this title or the pubhc interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter from Applicant/Site Plan 0bilo,21]3 1e _1 4=t]a319 CITY C= STIL_A-.-ER PACE 9 • • • Y`r G ADM NI • \ ) • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 DEP RTMENT Case No Date Fled . i fee Paid C43 Reaelpt No RATIOZvi FORM ACTtp'1V REQ TeD1 F =E _ Conditional or Special Use Permit • Design Review Planned Unit Development` . Variance $.'0/200 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment' $ I00 - Zoning Amendment' S 100 Subdivision* $ , 00+$5Q Resubdivision $100 Total Fee Certificate of Corliance $/0 $ j01200 $ :5 $ 00 'An escrow fee Is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted In connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 838 West Willard Assessor's Parcel No R 2 8- 0 3 0- 2_) 3- n 0 6 2 Zoning Distnct Description of Project Variance to allow basement access window wells within set back on side of building 1 hereby state the foregoing stet:. en and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my kn • wled• - - nd belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will ccmp1y with the permit Ifi is granted a use • Property Owner u a n e E r n d t 1 Representative Mailing Addres 1E11=11=]111111 Mailing Address Telephone No �Lt IIII Telephone No Signature /1/�' ��♦.��-AMEI Signature AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) �„2 0- X - Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory 1 1 Revised 5/22197 Total building floor Area 2800 sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved impervious Area sq ft, Number of off street parking spaces provld td 2_ • • • 811 West Pine Street Stillwater, Minnesota July 27, 2000 Planning Commission City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Planning Commission This is a request for a side yard variance to allow placement of two window wells in the side yard This request relates to remodeling and reconstruction of the building located at 838 West Willard The original structure was constructed in the late 1870s or early 1880s as a barn and stable It was originally placed on rock on the surface of the ground In approximately 1918, it was converted to a duplex by the second owner, and a partial basement put under the structure The property has needed renovation To facilitate that renovation, a basement under the structure was undertaken The draftsman of the basement plans provided for three windows in the basement to comply with the building code access requirements State Code requires a window well that is at least 3' X 3' The plans provided for the appropriate window size and appropriate window well size During construction, the masonry contractor was advised by the City Inspector that a window well could be used that would go adjacent to the property line Later, the contractor and I were advised that the zoning ordinance should be interpreted to classify a window well as an appurtenant structure which required minimum clearances from property lines The window wells had already been put in place pursuant to the original contact with the City Inspector The latter interpretation of the ordinance was what brings about this request for a variance At the time this was disclosed, the masonry opening in the basement walls had been constructed by the masonry contractor This request for variance is to allow the window wells, that would comply with building codes to be used I respectfully request that the variance be allowed for the • • • Planning Commission July 27, 2000 Page 2 following reasons 1 The windows will comply with the building code access requirements, and this was the intention when the design was originally contemplated 2 The window wells are within the property line, and will not be significantly visible or obstructive to the area adjacent to the building 3 It will avoid additional masonry construction and waste of windows sized for the openings 4 Use of the window wells will significantly enhance the light and usefulness of the basement structure which was the intention of the improvement in the first place 5 The plans were prepared by a draftsman who was familiar with requirements of the building code and who did not believe that a window well constituted a structure that required a variance Regardless of whether this belief was well-founded or not, the basement walls have been constructed to allow a building code access window The only way that the windows which are at the site can be utilized, is if the window wells can remain in place 6 Occupant safety and safe use would be enhanced by allowing window wells, in compliance with the building code, to remain in place 7 The placement of the window wells will not adversely effect the adjoining property owner, nor the manner in which the adjoining property owner will, or can, use the adjoining property The adjoin property owner's residence is a distance of 30+ f et om the property line Additionally, • e proper y .'ner has recently placed a dirt berm i mediatel t•/ the west of the property line DEA/clm enclosure R ' pectfu y1/ Duane E Arndt / • • Variance requested is for window wells marked "A" /� 9 7' E�'3'/_ slit 2�/1" 1/1 1 W • A r 20' 18' Ca 1 A. K 31' 6" 33'6" . Garage 24' % 26' alazouoo 2u-fasTxg 120' WILLARD STREET 9' r Scale 1" = 10' • • i August 6, 2000 Stillwater Planning Commission City Hall 216 N 4t street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Vanance Case V/00-54 Dear Mr Russell This request for a vanance puts us in an uncomfortable position because we are new in the community and neighborhood We are opposed to the request of vanance V/00-54 because of the following concems, first, to our knowledge Mr Ardnt has not had the property surveyed to locate the property monuments Secondly Mr Ardnt has attempted to establish a lot line by stringing a line between two old black posts that he thinks represents the so-called lot line This he has done twice and on both occasions the line he strung was in a different position Thirdly in earlier June the city inspector notified us that Mr Ardnt was not in compliance with established property set back measurement Mr Ardnt had already dug and installed, without a vanance, two means of egress basement windows Mr Ardnt did this pnor to the June inspection In addition Mr Ardnt after the crty inspector told him he was not in compliance, went ahead and installed large galvanized window wells Forth, pnor to the above Mr Ardnt s contractors on many occasions have used our property to access the West Side of this building without Mr Ardnt asking our permission At this time we request Mr Ardnt be required to 1 Have a legal property survey done by an independent licensed certified surveyor approved by your commission to establish property monuments 2 Supply us and the commission with a set of legal survey documents to prove said property monuments We thank you for your time and we will be at the August 14 meeting Sincerely, C. Richard & Jafni$'LaRon e 846 W Willard Street Stillwater, MN 55082 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUBN/00-55 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 213 West Cherry Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Jean Hamm Type of Application Special Use Permit and a Variance Project Description A Resubdivision to increase lot size from 5,500 square feet to 9,250 square feet, and a Variance to lot size requirements (10,000 square feet required, 9,250 square feet requested) for the construction of a duplex Discussion The request Is to increase the existing parcel of 5,500 square to 9,250 square feet by adding 3,750 square feet The transfer land would be from an adjacent 15,000 square foot parcel at 414 North Fourth Street This parcel has a common boundary with the south side of 213 West Cherry Street The Subdivision would make the small 5,500 square foot lot conforming and not render the 15,000 square foot lot nonconforming The request for a Vanance is to construct a duplex on a nonconforming lot size The minimum lot size for a duplex in the RB Two Family Zoning District is 10,000 square feet Variances are not given to lot size requirements There are no special circumstances to approve the density variance Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the requests, staff recommends the following conditions of approval Resubdivision 1 Approval by City Engineer for utility easements and drainage 2 Certificate of Survey with easements and corners staked for the utihty easement be prepared and then reviewed by the Community Development Director before resubdivision is recorded at the County Recommendations Subidvision — Approval Variance — Denial Findings for a Variance • • • 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel fmancial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifymg a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties m the same district and m the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the pubhc interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Petition/Map • Case No S Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance S70 Conditional or Special Use Permit S50/200 Design Review S25 Planned Unit Development* S500 X Variance S70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* S500 Zoning Amendment* S300 Subdivision* S100+$5( Resubdivision S100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION a 8a3aa/3113 • Address of Project .2/3 UYEsr CHt'RRY STgEeT Assessor's Parcel No 0113 Zoning District RB -2 Descriptilon of Project sgResubdtu cc eis - imrease, Io+ Sa2 (ielr, cow ffik c,t aJ mirage in3 et sec Simi. "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith i all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify / will comply • with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner t J7 %11 Ha rh w► Mailing Address Q13 kleSt Cher] St Telephone No 4'37— Zg.l Signature it4S-frn Representative Mailing Address Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x /00 i 115 Ile Land Area 500Sj trare feety er,D.SO $.3 Height of Buildings Stibnes Feet Pnncipal Accessory Add 5ecarid Pe we cQtpott lobs tf e_. Skbwk and 101- couerage ve Wremenf s-ft 6eC6mplle wci, Total building floor Area IiSt0 �ao�fri' q ft Existing 4000 sq ft Proposed 3).600 sq ft Paved Impervious Area no sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 (00%5) 150 • 15° 45 102 \ (60e1) (0$52) 1515 65 — o \5 N + \ G 150 �F,,,uF NLY ko- i a — vNes� _ ,4 ,So 100 (Odle) (Od13) 16 e` O+ 6• . C 012,_ 1 \ (o}Iq 0▪ 0 t% 1025_ `S %)60 ------ 2 '6 , \ 64_ 5 (p ' 100 \ �011. is'� g0/ \ ▪ ) 50 \ �Os, lr 50+I \ 12\ F9 eC 9� \ ti ��7 \ \ ° c \ (odR3) 3 �\ \ F� (Dell,) \+ N \\ \ \ '8 (01,1) w \\ 1°O \ \ `S \ \\ 25 \ ,+— (01112) \ \\ \ \ \ \\ i+I, i - 1p0 \ 50�1i (00112) .ATED STREET pERP�p,�l 50 50 C1 21bon Map 1 N toll 6) 3 - _i \c — 50 12 (OA3) 50 \ 50 +l 6-0 -11 5 2 20° 151 (offo) 15 (01e6) 115 100 (01e5) / 150 ) (ORa) (Oh) \ 11 v 10 4 4 4 °0 50� ' l 9 (0 R21w R20W RI9W T32N�� T32N 171N ■M T31N� T3ON 1V� 130N 129N • •�� R9N .MR.t -Air V RAN R33w R21w 1230w Vicinity Map vntl hcaw►t dw611 n5 0 106 Scale in Feet Tb doing en no..capra .,,.,melm r hod mods am. ,ar.er. wwoMCompcacao. n0 firm.. we. l.mad rwrs papaws dlaw vV Vb � Dom 11Y.YWl Coolly (Urgers Oes Fs. 81112) M7 Fuel moaten [Naugle qua0. SOS SLUTOLWp1NG (\REF* 1 • • • 213 West Cherry Street 1 Resubdmston 2. Permission to Build a Duplex July 28, 2000 1 Resubdivisron to Increase Lot Size This resubdivision will increase the lot size of 213 West Cherry Street from 5,500 s f to 9,250 s f , bnnging the lot into conformity with minimum lot sizes The resubdivision will transfer land from an adjacent large lot (15,000 s f) to 213 West Cherry Street The adjacent lot, which is 414 North Fourth Street, will be 11,250 s f after the resubdivision The parcel to be transferred from 414 North Fourth Street has a common boundary with the south side of 213 West Cherry St The parcel is the back end of a 200 foot deep lot The parcel measures 50 feet east to west on the common boundary and 75 feet north to south The parcel does not have any street frontage 2 Vanance for a Duplex Permission is requested to build a duplex on this site, 213 West Cherry Street The duplex will be constructed by adding a second story to the existing one-story structure In addition, the car port will be replaced with a garage and the garage will have a second story which will be part of the upstairs duplex Set back and lot coverage requirements will be complied with (less than 40% coverage, 10 foot side yards, 5 foot set back for garage) A vanance is needed for lot width and lot size Lot size is 9,250 s f versus 10,000 required for a duplex Lot width is 60 feet on Cherry Street and 50 feet in the back on the south boundary, versus 75 feet required The proposed duplex conforms with the neighborhood Three of the six houses on this block of Cherry Street are multi -family four-plexes The Four-plex adjacent on the east boundary is on a smaller lot and has no off-street parking The other two multi -family dwellings on this block of Cherry Street are on larger lots and have off street parking A duplex on a lot of this size fits comfortably into the existing usage • • • WEST CHERRY STREET (Ai 1 0 0 1 • I4---5O'--4I1 E EXlstaysi Lot Stz's © a13 w Cherr 5+- 5,5ao s f ® yiy N LOA S - 15, 00o s f'o Posed `}raps- tv U.'RP JT S1TtiffTt o&) =SOJ rLl z8, 2O0_a 20h;113=R3-2 • • 213 West Cherry Street - Application for a Duplex Vanance - July 28,2000 Information Permission requested to build a duplex by adding a second story to the existing structure The carport will also be replaced with a garage, providing two off-street parking places Stillwater Planning Commission petitioned for a vanance for two factors (1) lot size is 9,250 square feet versus 10,000 in the code, and (2) lot width is 60 feet on Cherry Street and 50 feet in the rear (south boundary) versus 75 feet in the code The duplex will comply with setback requirements 10 feet side yards, 5 feet set back for garage and less than 40% coverage of the lot by the building Signature By signing below, I acknowledge I am familiar with this request and do not object to it /2"a.r.:11e AC-10,G Address /ao 4/1( ` A/ 174a 47 fri' 2.4,4K 1}Sr"3 a % Li c__ItNa--) .2 z.-) vv' 1._, dt.0S$ 30 / w //�,c, -X T- 3oi id S.f 4,0 N). zp2-} -r-c 24 2. w CAN e..ine . /(ttatte,,4( 6,5,e,c>r _570 4) 5--o4.s./ yizi AL zo- si, Zzt pll citour r 0 — p 15 10 ice \ /J 15 P/ a O I. Coate) 1 20 585'1 .15a to. 1). 19 1 8 (od14 o-� T \ 17 16 • • (OA2) • :ATED STREET 50 50 3 2 1 (oflo) 21ton Map ory (oats) - 150 0 150 P tp,Vf Aso �A 150 ��S (Op00 V ro*4) ` (009) n). . \i �»'VVVV \� y' � 1_ ,0it" NA 1301 N 10 , l 50 r°° 1 _• so�� 1 -�j 1�\\ ' 1 �O tN175 100 �( V / \ 15 ' 4 s 4, \ O$ , q---- �� c , k \,X.311...4 .- ‘. ,7 \ .U1 , \ I�.\ A0, -is, \ Oc.1 --/ — - /;50 1 (oils) -------A00 (owe) • • 12 S r' \ 11 (ollo) /--� `S `-'----- w --- �� 4�! 10 � 114 1ao� (0A7) 9 / co- 921W 92OW 9,9W 9IIW 931W 970W Viandy Map �=r beiftaweveAtt 0 108 Scale in Feet 14dldk‘rec,ss $haw k C& 7b71 ofs.' vs �1. ,1..r.,.eewad .. mow.. Tim pera � P.�... w...�on..... :.rfor mr XL 211X, ) SAWIVIANANNG RE14 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/00-56 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 150 South Third Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Dianne Hark and Michael Rice Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A Special Use Permit to create a condominium umt Discussion The applicant is requestmg a special use pernut to construct a 1840 square foot condominium on the upper south side of the existing commercial property at the above address It would have two bedrooms and two baths The entire building will be sprinkled The only exterior changes proposed are installation of wmdows in the south wall, providing there are no buildmg or fire codes that would prevent it Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 Approval of the Fire Chief and the Buildmg Official 2 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 3 Landscapmg shall be improved Plan to be reviewed and approved by Commumty Development Director 4 The trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy sohd masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the project 5 Extenor hghtmg plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 6 Existing portable/plastic sign m front of building to be removed immediately 7 Two parking spaces shall signed for residential umt Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings Special Use Permit The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be m harmony with the general purpose of the zomng ordinance Attachments Application Form/Site Plan i .,use No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Fees XSpecial/Conditional Use Permit $50/200 Variance $70/200 Resubdivision $100 _Subdivision* $100+50/lot _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 _Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (► e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project /3D S 'T// / .S [e Assessor's Parcel Noon d VG? 1407 (GEO Code) Zoning DistrictA Description of Project Q it)- 0 -alit' Fk Sa - N4LF of B1-466', "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, Information and evidence subm:ffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and be/,ef, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner, Mailing Address /&D Vii Rib, _S City - State - Zi Telephone Signature / le,g Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \MCNAMARA\SHEILA\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 Te draft bread carp... gni trd roads as spur F �Wdepn fMYdEm The *mina add b used Ic• Pies Wdeder Cwgb ee gvebbb ey Ymde Swum Wdeeer Cesy9urph CRa Peas 165 Ica®! Pm* et. bs!m AS= Noe.. Mop midst JMm SO) 1tw -rt Ica OA LZ L .11•+5v4W4.14 ice, 5 ':--rv-eY 7o2 Coo I\ 0.-ft2 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/DR/00-57 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 217 North Mam Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Busmess District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Joselyn Tilson — Valley Bookseller Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the sign ordinance for an additional sign and logo at the Valley Bookseller Discussion The applicant is requesting a variance to the sign ordinance for a 1' 6" by 30' 8" wall sign for the south side of the building The sign would not be lit Colors of the sign would be white and "salmon" with a stencil of their V logo m the background The ordinance for the Central Business District states that when a building or business abuts two or more pubhc streets, an additional sign located on each street building face is allowed There is a city parking lot butting on the south side of the Bookseller, which creates an expansive space The request for the variance on the west side or Mam Street side is for a V logo on the upper nght area of the front of the building It is backlit and is 3' 6" m diameter The sign that is shown on the awning is permitted by the sign ordinance The logo is separate and considered another sign Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 No additional signs 2 South sign shall not be lit Recommendation Denial Findings 1 That a hardslup peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbormg violations are not hardships justifymg a variance • • • 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties m the same distract and m the same vicuuty, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizmg of the variance will not be of substantial detrunent to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and mtent of this title or the public mterest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Photos/Elevations/HPC Mmutes HPC Action signage July 5, 2000 Approval +7 — 0 w/discussion of approving additional • • RCPT # CHECK # c,_.a No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Special/Conditional Use Permit XVariance Resubdivision Subdivision* Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Planning Unit Development * $500 _Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material 0 e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater 1site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Assessor's Parcel Nog zp-1-0Q6v (GEO Code) Zoning District C6 P Description of Project * -acc KS wee 5c`y-NC"\6 Address of Project 2-1-4- i\1 /tea- S} Fees $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot /2/,ems . de to 66,..4-egz_7_,_(:)„ "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submiffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner ,)o- v\ -1TYsen Mailing Address 2- NI ,(A.a_; e\ S} City - State - Zip Ski l\ Wc-v , YN f\ 5Z Z Telephone No 4- 51 - c-t-3/) _3 Z Signature (,r_. - Representative Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stones Feet Principal Accessory Total Building floor area square feet Existing square feet Proposed square feet Paved Impervious Area square feet No of off-street parking spaces H \MCNAMARA\SHEILA\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 08/10/00 THU 13 38 FAX 8514303185 VALLEY BOOKSELLER rm001 • • • THEVALLEYB00KSELLER Fax T° Sue Fitzgerald From Joci Tilsen Fax 651-430-8810 Pages Phone Date Re Hardship cc Sue — Let me know if this is adequate Thanks Joci Valley Bookseller needs a vanance for signage on the south side of the budding because It is the most visible part of the building, due to the southern exposure and adjacent city owned parking lot Driving or walking from the south, the building is fully exposed (except for some trees) for more than one block, not having identifying information limits Valley Bookseller's accessibility to customers, by their inability to identify the only bookseller in Stillwater with new books In addition, from the casual observers perspective, it appears that Commercial Street dead -ends on the South side of the building, creating an expectation of identification of the building Valley Bookseller needs a variance for the west side of the building to have a sign with several components, one of which is a large V contnbuting to the identity of Valley Bookseller In order for an independent bookseller to be successful in the current economy, one must create a sense of brand identity, so that people remember where they have been and what the name of the store is We have designed a unique shopping expenence and an essential component is the V It is repeated throughout the store and in order to accomplish our goal of creating brand identity, it is vital that it be in the front of our store The sign design for the front, is unique, consistent with the architectural integnty of the building, broad in its reflection of the early part of the century and accomplishes our business goals 2.1- tiuliTH MAIN Si ItEFr ,TMti.ArrR, MFN.LbOTA 5,482 TF1.1311074F 651430-3385 NV 651 439 $135 0. Y \' %,ti.4.tY..J') bLLfR LJ. 4 joci@valleybookseller com • • • Awning detail see 3/G5 Painted Graphic see 4/G5 ii�� xrw a '` fh 'f'q" t �Y x4CIt I} ° ' • ih^X 1 r ti �t Lx1. 7/V, 9,,5 1 4rfre%e 6 p�g7�r,;,_ 7 4.4 U-tj K [ry — r ‘,•-i' { t.,re .� Side View looking North 11 �1 tit t� The Valley Bookseller Exterior Graphics Treatment Prep° ed by Ian Deng Cv p Inc M htnmed MI 1651 653 303Q t Dnng IK M cep 1 MI1 612 3 8 333Q o w J 23 200(1 I) R d G2 • • • The Valley Bookseller Exterior Graphics Treatment Design Review Submital 217 North Main St Stillwater Minnesota Pap edhy lane Nag Go p 1 M Monied Mfl 651 653 3030 Sin Deng Inc M neap Its MI I 12 3313 3330 D.a 1 23 2000 Rev sod • • • Awning/Sign see 1 /G4 I']lli\'ALLL•Y1A5bX i Front View looking East Logo Detail see 1/G5 1 Side View see G2 The Valley Bookseller Exterior Graphics Treatment P pa ed by Una Dosg Go p Inc M htomed MI 1651 653 3030 tta De q Inc A copal MI1 612 330 339 D 1 23 701 0 P d D g Gl • M • City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission July 5, 2000 Ms Fitzgerald noted the applicant is requesting both a logo and sign on the front elevation, and will be seeking a vanance from the Planning Commission for signage on the south elevation Dunng the discussion, it was noted the south elevation faces the city parking lot which could be considered a public way which would allow signage on that elevation Regarding the request for both the logo and sign on the front elevation, Ms Tilsen noted if the V is removed, it leaves a large empty space due to the height of the building She also noted the logo in needed to create an identity as an independent bookseller HPC suggestions included using the V in Valley Bookseller for the logo, somehow physically attaching the logo to the sign lettenng, or incorporating the V in the signage as proposed in the design for the east elevation Mr Johnson also suggested introducing a color band to break up the height of the building, m lieu of the logo Regarding the request for verbiage on the awning on the south elevation to promote vanous sections in the store, Mr Tomten noted that verbiage is generally limited to the awning valence, rather than the awning itself Mr Lane agreed that it should be possible to add a valence to the awnings Mr Johnson suggested the lighting on the front elevation looks a bit high Mr Lane said he would look at that Mr Johnson moved approval, clarifying condition No 1 to approve the sign and tapered canopy, excluding the V logo, allowing the shepherd's hook lighting on the west elevation, the awning on the south elevation with verbiage to be placed on the valence and recommending that the Planning Commission grant a vanance for the requested signage on the south elevation, that the square footage of the signage equal one square foot per lineal frontage, and approving the color pallet for the building and awnings as presented Mr Eastwood seconded the motion Mr Johnson later said he would be amendable to amending his motion to allow the V logo if placed on the same plane as the lettering on the canopy, incorporating the logo into the one allowable sign, Mr Miller seconded that amended motion Discussion ensued as to the appropnateness of the HPC recommending signage in excess of what is allowable Mr Tomten expressed his concern about doing so, and Mr Lieberman agreed that giving such direction to the Planning Commission may diminish the role of the HPC Mr Lieberman suggested adding language to the motion that while the HPC has no opinion regarding the vanance for the south elevation, the HPC does find the proposed design of the signage appropnate Mr Johnson accepted that language as a friendly amendment to the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No DR/00-21 Design review for Harvest Inn, Dawn Wagenaar, applicant • • • City of Stillwater Hentage Preservation Commission July 5, 2000 Present Howard Lieberman, chairperson Beth Diem, Phil Eastwood, Jeff Johnson, Robert Kimbrel, Dean Miller, and Roger Tomten Others Planner Sue Fitzgerald Mr Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Kimbrel noted the vote on Case DR/00-15 was not recorded, the vote for approval was unanimous Mr Lieberman moved to accepted the minutes of June 5, 2000, as corrected, all in favor (There was no second to the motion ) Case No SUP/DR/00-44 This case was continued to the August meeting Case No DR/00-19 Design review of extenor modifications for pool addition at Stillwater Inn, 1750 W Frontage Road Tim Balstad, applicant Mr Balstad was present He said in order to keep his business competitive he planned to add a swimming pool to the motel He said the same architect who designed the onginal structure is doing the plans for the addition The addition will be of the same matenals and colors as the main building, but the exterior tnm will be lightened some, he said Mr Lieberman suggested that Mr Balstad consult with staff regarding paint colors Ms Fitzgerald asked if there would be any additional outside lighting Mr Balstad said he may use/move some of the existing lights, but there will be no more illumination that there currently is Ms Fitzgerald said even if the existing lights are moved, the lighting must be downlit Mr Johnson noted that conditional of approval No 2, review of extenor lighting, applies even if the existing lights are moved Mr Johnson asked about ventilation units All mechamcals will be inside, Mr Balstad said, and vents will be located at ground level to the rear of the building Mr Lieberman moved approval as conditioned, with the final paint color and lighting to be reviewed by staff Mr Miller seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously X. Case No DR/00-20 Design review of extenor modifications for Valley Bookseller at 217 N Main St Jocelyn Tilsen, applicant Ms Tilsen, her husband and co-owner, and architect Bob Lane were present Ms Tilsen said the front elevation of the building presents a challenge due to the setback from the street and the height of the building i • • 1 Plan View Awning 3/8 = 1' 0" N Awning support bar above Low Voltage recessed downlight Fluorescent up Tight, paint facture to match bnck Note Refer to SteinDesign drawings for awning construction details 2 Front Elevahon Awning 3/8u=1'0" 18-4 Awning support 1 sit bar through bnck wall w beanng plates both sides of bnck Painted letters to match clr anodized alum Painted letters ` Painted letters to match to match prrs 137 2096 clr anodaed alum Letter support template, 1/4 alum , paint to match bnck 3 Section n t s Top of awning roof 15 10' face letters pattern by Lane Design l- ♦— Fluorescent up Tight, O point facture to match bnck I• Face tnm of awning, alum clr anodize fin The Valley Bookseller Exterior Graphics Treatment Prepared by Drown June 23 2000 Drawing Lane Design Croup Inc Mohtomedi MN 651 653 3839 Revised G4 Stein Design Inc Minneapolis MN 612 338 3339 • • • Warrn white neon behind reverse channel logo 3/16 alum logo weld and gnnd all retums, paint to match dr anodized window trim 1 Logo Detail n t s regional. 3 Cloth Awning Graphics South Elevahon 1 /2" = 1' 0' Sunbrella 4626 Salmon fabnc awning matenal removable, over bldg standard awning frame Dark blue wave pattern silkscreen to fabnc Off white text, five different messages one per awning Five awnings total THEVAILIE D FAO 1KSEILIER 3-color graphic, hand painted w acrylic polyurethane paint over stucco fin wall see G3, color match samples will be provided by designer 134ft 4 Painted Wall Graphic South Wall 3/8" = 1' 0" The Valley Bookseller Exterior Graphics Treatment Prepared by Drawn June 23 2000 Drawing Lone Design Group Inc Mahtomedi MN 651 653 3839 Revised � � SteinDesign Inc Minneapolis MN 612 338 3339 . 3 6 max 1 Typical Wallwasher Style n is 3-color graphic, hand painted w acrylic polyurethane paint over stucco fin wall see G3, color match samples will be provided by designer THEV ILLEY .79D 14-0 2 Painted Wall Graphic Rear Entrance Wall 1/2" = 1' 0" 64 3 Cloth Awning Graphics Rear Entrance 4 0' x 14' 6"" 1/2" = 1' 0" Sunbrella 4626 Salmon fabnc awning matenal removable, over bldg standard awning frame Dark blue wave pattern silkscreen to fabnc The Valley Bookseller Exterior Graphics Treatment Prepared by Lane Design Group Inc Mahlomedi MN 651 653 3839 SterDesign Inc Minneapolis MN 612 338 3339 Drawn June 23 2000 Drawing Revised G6 r • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-58 Planning Commission Date August 14, 2000 Project Location 718 West Churchill Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Russell Hultman Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required,25' 6" requested) for the construction of an addition to a garage Discussion The applicant is requesting a variance for a 396 square foot addition to the existing 352 square foot single car garage The zoning ordinance requires a 30 foot buildmg setback from the property line The existing garage is located 25' 6" from the property line Architectural style, color and materials will match the existing garage Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 The garage shall be similar in architectural style, color and materials as the existing garage 2 Drainage from the roof shall remain on site 3 All plans be shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and m the same vicuuty, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors I, • • • 3 That the authonzmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and mtent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan 1 • • Lot Size (dimensions) I DO x (SO Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory .Ise No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Special/Conditional Use Permit )< Variance Resubdivision Subdivision* _Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 _Planning Unit Development * $500 _ Certificate of Compliance $70 _Design Review $25 Fees $50/200 $70/200 $100 $100+50/lot *An escrow fee is also required to the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting matenal (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater A site plan is required with applications PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Protect,i 4(g'1") C41-1 ill ST Assessor's Parcel No 3S-e�ao a i oo 1/6 y� Code) Zoning District Description of Project A -CtrtJ O� $X G 4Praft9 e�`�` VOXZ "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence subm►ffed herewith in all respects, to file best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with file permit if it is granted and used " Property Owne‘155 1- --ri��ijl 4-4) Representative Mailing Address (Ai Cb{UViCt r tk SA--, Mailing Address City - State - Zip Si-itbA i 110,-) S0g Z City - State - Zip // Telephone No Coc (- 4 35- 7"DCo 1 Telephone No Signature - Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total Building floor area .748 square feet Existing 35 Z square feet Proposed 3° t,, square feet Paved Impervious Area squar feet No of off-street parking spaces S H \MCNAMARA\SHEILA\PLANAPP FRM June 22 2000 i 120 120 120 50 6 50 I� 5 4 15 35 — l 1" 3 115 7 ' 8 P. 50 1 50 3 35 Its 50 50 2 1 15 35 I 3s A 12 9 110'. 11 1 12 6 HOLCOMB 7 8 9 1 I So 10 50 8 8 11 12 50 8 30 3 12 121 25 1 6 0 50 38 1 . 50 50 6 0 6 0 E'S 8 6 0 El 5 v 4 3 • 2 21 1 7 50 9 50 8 10 50 8 8 6 0 SI < 12 = • I-.. 50 50 2 WEST 50 50 50 11 40 50 - 6 - 5 4 3 8 2 A 1 F_ 0 • 0 0 • 10- • 9 • S 7 8 9 - 10 11� 1 1 R073) 50 50 50 PODERSON 8 6 50 F 5 8 9 50 50 4 F 3 8 2 8 50 1 � Lncattpn Map -IANC C)CK STRFFT 8 75 75 6 0 STREET 5o 2 8 8 6 0 cn 50 5 8 5o 4 1 3 m 5 50 2 50 8 8 6 0 7 150 8 150 I 6 53 5 36 8 4 8 3 4 a 28 50 10 11 ii 12 7 8- 9 8 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 6 25 7 F 6 50 5 8 • so 1 so • 4 QI 3 St DI 10 50 • 10 50 2 N 50 8 8 so 1 8 0 12 50 60 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 m F" w W6 0 Iz w_ rY 160 12 150 50 8 6 6.3 5 5 10 50 4 7 0 8 R 9 50 6 8 3 4 8 9 8 6 • 50 4 7 8• 8 8 9 50 5 0 1C 50 50 50 1- 1n _r _w 0_^516 5 4 130 7 10014 R2IW R2OW R19W T)ON 128N R22W R2IW R2OW Mandy Map 7 0 150 Scale in Feet 11b OaY9bbia.d adiyrWat dIramothatry 1.•i: nadwa. waskinalm Coolly e a1 i..o°3' nspra• t�a Wdom 0arrybny Pray (GI )4304510 5 Pod da.4 a+♦9•a am ] nm n brta ati o.at8 are t�,est aaa 2[00 • • 1 0 -h t (t, P 4- C E NA 74 r 1 IT , P ,c , e> e. 04. a oe x' N N LA Cr P I Y ^L'"'l..r F.r `Nib • 0 LO 0 (0043) /Vi/a-a‘- 25 (0044) _LL—,_ 5 (Q046) 501 9 50 kl 0-1-uEc c_L 5� 10 7) U.) 6 0 50 50 50 hard WOOD WINDOW'S Hurd Millwork Co! -my 575 S Whelen Ave Medford 154451 (715) 748 2011 Date Trapezoid & Direct Set •stomer Name Customer P 0 # Product Description Quantity Signature Page of . _I-`7 —-veiv)-hMQ M PIA 7fiJ4 sr, a. Z zz• r c X -13. Dimensions must be basic unit size Trapezoid and Direct Set Unit orders are non -cancelable 1 • MEMO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Zoning Amendment Allowing Two Family Residences in the Cottage Residential Zoning Distnct Case No ZAT/00-05 Date August 10, 2000 An informal request was presented by Mark Putman at the Planning Commission meeting of July 10, 2000 The change would allow attached two family residential uruts on corner lots in the Cottage Residential Distnct The mum lot size for the two family structures would be 9,000 square feet and located on corner lots only Separate garages would be required to face separate street faces Recommendation Approval Attachment Draft ZAT/00-05 • • 1 4. • • • Ordinance No 00- ZAT/00-05 7 Rear yard House 25 feet Garage 3 feet 8 Frontage Requirement2 35 feet 5 Design Review Design Review is required for accessory dwelling umts or duplex developments subject to Traditional Development Design Standards 'Seventy five percent of front facing garages must have the garage setback at least 6 feet from the front wall or porch line of house House and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for vanety of garage types and locations (front loaded, side loaded and recessed) and front and extenor side house elevations 2Where two or more adjacent lots do not meet street frontage requirements, the dnveways must be combined " 4 A new Distnct is added as follows "Subdivision 1 Ld CR Cottage Residential Distnct 1 Permitted Buildings and Uses In the Cottage Residential Distnct the following buildings and uses and their accessory buildings and uses are permitted a Dwelling houses each occupied by not more than one family and with a garage no larger than two (2) stalls b Parks, playgrounds, greens and other open space area c Two family residences on corner lots-3 2 Permitted Uses with Special Use Permits In a Cottage Residential Distnct, the following buildings and uses are permitted by Special Use Permit a Home occupations subject to all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance regulating home occupation 3 Accessory Uses No more than two accessory buildings, one pnvate garage and one accessory building 90 square feet maximum may be located m a residential premises 4 Development Regulations a Area, setback and height regulations ♦ • • • Provision Single Family 1 Maximum building height Main building 2 stones and 28 feet Garages 1 story and 20 feet 2 Average lot area (for PUD) 9,000squarefeetduplex 3 Minimum lot width 50 feet 4 Minimum lot depth NA 5 Minimum front yard requirements Front yard House 15 feet Front yard garage (front facing)` 20 feet Front yard garage (side facing) 15 feet 6 Side yard Intenor House 5 feet Garage 5 feet Corner House 15 feet Garage 15 feet 7 Rear yard House 25 feet Garage 3 feet 8 Frontage Requirement' 30 feet 9 Dnveway width maximum 12 feet 'A minimum of 25 percent of lots must have garages completely recessed (more than 6 feet from front of building), a minimum of 25 percent of lots must have garages setback 2 feet or more and a maximum of 50 percent of garages may project a maximum of 6 feet out from the front wall of the residence Of that 50 percent, 25 percent must have habitable space above the garage and 25 percent must have front porches extending in front of the residence House and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for variety of garage types and locations (front loaded, side loaded and recessed) and front and extenor side house elevations 'Where two or more adjacent lots do not meet street frontage requirements, the dnveways must be combined " 3All garages for two family structures shall be setback 6 feet beyond the front of the residence One two stall garage maximum shall be located on each corner street