Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-05-08 CPC Packet
• 1 water. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, May 8, 2000, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of Apnl 10, 2000 AGENDA Public Hearings 7 p m to 8 30 p m 1 Case No V/00-16 A vanance to the Duplex Residential requirements for a 800 square foot addition to an existing duplex or a 8,437 square foot lot, 10,000 square feet required at 216 West Wilkins Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Marcia Kilbourne, applicant 2 Case No ZAM/00-2 A zoning map amendment to rezone from RB, Two Family Residential Distnct to CBD, Central Business Distnct, at the property located south of the Main Street Parking Lot Mark Balay, representing Andiamo Enterpnses, applicant 3 Case No V/DR/00-19 A vanance for a boat ticket office/storage building and a vanance to parking south of the Main Street parking lot in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Mark Balay, representing Andiamo Enterpnses, applicant 4 Case No SUP/00-20 A special use permit for a 100 foot monopole telecommunications tower and receptions of PCS telecommunications signals on Bnck Street in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Jaron Johnson, representing Spnnt, applicant 5 Case No V/00-21 A vanance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 4 feet requested) and rear yard setback (5 required, 4 feet requested) for the construction of a garage at 1337 South Second Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Russell and Jacqueline Saystrom, applicant 6 Case No V/00-22 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 24 feet requested) for the construction of a gazebo at 202 North Martha Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Kyle Weed, applicant 7 Case No V/00-23 A vanance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 3 feet requested) and a vanance to impervious surface coverage (30% maximum, 44% requested) for the construction of a two-story addition at 402 North Second Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Martin and Judith Hansen, applicants CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 • MEMO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Case No V/00-25 Date May 5, 2000 Case No V/00-25 is listed on the agenda In going through your packet you will notice there is no Case No V/00-25 After further review and information received from the applicant, it was determined that a vanance was not needed • i • • • 8 Case No SUBN/00-24 A resubdivision of a lot located at 1221 North Broadway into three lots consisting of Lot A = 17,292 square feet, Lot B=29,580 and Lot C=36,764 and a vanance to the slope setback in the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct Tom Brownson, representing George Middleton, applicant 9 Case No V/00-25 A vanance to the side yard setback for the construction of a garage with living space above at 923 South Sixth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distract Todd Anderson, representing Scott Junker, applicant 10 Case No V/00-26 A vanance to the front (30 feet requested, 8 feet required) and side yard (30 feet required, 20 feet requested) setbacks for the construction of a warp around porch at 126 North Martha Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Bnan and Serese Honebnnk, applicants 11 Case No V/00-27 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 0 feet requested) and the side yard setback (4 feet required, 0 feet requested) for the rebuilding/expansion at 517 North Owens Street in the CA, General Commercial Distnct Edward and Kathleen Schmidt, applicant 12 Case No SUP/00-28 A special use permit for the construction of a 4 unit, 3 story housing structure with 8 enclosed parking spaces on an existing lot on the south side of Olive Street between 2nd and 3rd Streets in the CBD, Central Business Distnct Donald and Mananne Nolde, applicant 13 Case No V/00-29 A vanance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 5 feet requested) to extend the width of the dnving lane at 1820 Market Dnve in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial Distnct David Reimer, applicant 14 Case No SUB/00-30 A subdivision of 22 75 acre lot into four lots consisting of 6 16 acres, 3 37 acres, 3 24 acres and 3 15 acres with two outlots consisting of A=2 49 and B=-4 34 at the northwest corner of Hwy 36 and Hwy 5 intersection in the CRD, Campus Research and Development Distnct Coen and Stumpf and Associates, Inc , representing Jim Bradshaw, applicant 15 Case No SV/00-31 A street vacation of the west 20 feet of Sunset Dnve to the southeast corner abutting Lot 5, Block 3, Rearrangement of Radley Sunnyslope Addition in the RA, Single Family Residential Distract Ryan Smith, applicant Other Items 8 30 p m -Review of Phase II Expansion Area plans for mixed use residential development (380 units proposed) located south of McKusick Road and north of Boutwell Road US Homes, applicant • 1 Planning Commission Apnl 10, 2000 • Present Jerry Fontaine, chairperson Glenna Bealka, Robert Gag, Russ Hultman, Dave Middleton, John Rhemberger, Darwin Wald and Terry Zoller • • Others Planner Sue Fitzgerald Absent Karl Ranum Mr Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Wald, seconded by Mr Rhemberger, moved approval of the minutes of March 13, 2000, all in favor Case No V/00-13 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 25 feet requested) for replacement of the front concrete stoop and steps at 1208 S Everett St m the RA, Single Family Residential Distnct James and Connie Schug, applicants Mr Schug explained the request He said the existing stoop and steps need to be replaced, the request is to dress up the front of the house with the addition of an 8x12' roofed porch The addition will extend the existing roof overhang by several feet Mr Schug noted that due to the topography of the area, most houses are built close to the front property line, there are several neighbonng homes closer to the front line that the proposed addition He said he had contacted all his neighbors, and none objected to the plans, Pat and Marty Rossini wrote a letter of support Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No SUP/00-14 A special use permit for the addition to an existing office building for office use at 808 N Fourth St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Gary Bressler, representing Consolidated Lumber Co , applicant Present for the discussion were Mr Bressler and Mr Dave Majeski of Consolidated Lumber Mr Majeski explained that there are fewer employees housed at the office than in the past, but there is a need for increased conference and training space Mr Majeski said conferences/training probably would be scheduled no more than once a month, with the hours of operation 8 a m to 5 p m Mr Bressler explained the existing roof is starting to show signs of detenoration, thus the proposal to add a second story The addition would be honzontal siding, with a pitched roof and gables to provide more of a residential look The fence along the north property line would be extended up the hill to Fifth Street, there would be five parking spaces to the rear (Fifth Street) of the building Mechamcals would be located inside the building, rather than on the roof Speaking in opposition were Matt Engstrom, 809 N Fourth St , Brad Hochalter, 820 N Fourth St , Bill Pappas, 720 N Fifth St , Cassie Ludwig, 820 N Fourth St , Nathan and Liz Wilson, 215 W Elm St , Jack Seal, 211 W Elm St , Joe Thompson, 206 W Elm St A letter of opposition was received from Jan and Jerry Brunsoman, 715 N Fifth St , Ms Ludwig also provided a petition containing signatures of residents opposed to the proposal Concerns centered on increased traffic and safety issues, especially 1 • • • Planning Commission Apnl 10, 2000 along Fifth Street, where there currently is no parking area, the impact on the residential character of the neighborhood, loss of view, appearance/height of the building In discussion at the table, Mr Middleton suggested the possibility of redesigning the parking area to accommodate all the necessary parking in the front to alleviate concerns about traffic/safety on Fifth Street Mr Zoller said he thought the plans would improve the appearance of the existing building and agreed that he thought it would be possible to address some concerns by revising the parking layout, Mr Hultman agreed with that observation Mr Rheinberger said even if the number of employees isn't increasing, the proposal represents an increase in business use in a residential neighborhood — a perception of an intensity of use Mr Wald spoke of the potential for increased traffic and future growth Mr Fontaine also expressed a concern about intensifying the commercial use Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Gag, moved to deny the request based on an expansion of conunercial use in a residential area Motion to deny passed 5-3, with Mrs Bealka, Mr Hultman and Mr Zoller voting no Mr Fontaine noted the applicant can appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council Case No V/00-15 A vanance to the side yard setback (30 feet required, 26 5 feet requested) for construction of a two -car garage at 401 N Third St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Howard Berg, applicant Mr Berg noted he could meet the required setback, however, he would like to keep the new garage m the same location as the existing structure because the north wall of the garage acts as a portion of the retaining wall along the north property line The garage will be gabled on the north and south sides for drainage purposes Mr Zoller suggested there would be a gutter to prevent erosion of the yard Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Rheinberger, moved approval as conditioned Mr Zoller asked that the motion be amended to include an additional condition that there be a gutter on the east side of the structure, Mr Middleton and Mr Rheinberger accepted the amendment to the motion Amended motion passed unanimously Case No V/00-16 A vanance to the Duplex Residential requirements for an 800-square foot addition to an existing duplex at 216 W Wilkins St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Marcia Kilbourne, applicant This case was continued Mr Fontaine allowed three neighbonng residents who were in the audience to speak to the case Expressing concerns about increased traffic and the number of cars already parking on the street were Todd Sharpe, 1003 N Fifth St, Brian Kogler, 1016 N Fifth St , and Jon Shimota, 1015 N Fifth St , directly across the street from the applicant Mr Kogler and Mr Shimota suggested the duplex currently is actually being used as a triplex Mr Fontaine and Ms Fitzgerald advised them they could make a formal complaint regarding the tnplex if they wished Mr Fontaine advised the three to phone City Hall to see if the case will be on next month's agenda Case No V/00-17 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 28 feet requested) for construction of a front porch addition at 125 S Greeley St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Dennis Harcey, applicant 2 Planning Commission Apnl 10, 2000 •Mr Harcey was present and bnefly explained his plans Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor • • Case No SUP/00-18 A special use permit for a temporary greenhouse (15x20) from mid-Apnl through the end of May for Valley Co-op at 215 N William St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Kerry Larson, applicant The applicant was not present Ms Fitzgerald explained the request is for a temporary greenhouse much like those at Cub and Target, she also noted the Co-op will be moving to its new downtown location in the very near future Mr Zoller suggested that the approval should be granted for the year 2000 only and only until the Co-op moves Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval as conditioned, with the additional condition suggested by Mr Zoller, motion passed unanimously Terntonal Pnson Trail Am Stefan reviewed concept plans for the trail She noted she is working with histonan Brent Peterson in developing four different interpretive themes for the trail The developers have agreed to maintain the trail Mr Fontaine asked whether it would be a walking path or one that could accommodate bikers Ms Stefan noted there was lots of room in plaza areas where bike racks could be placed, more thought will be given to that as the project develops further, she said Mr Hultman said he would encourage that the trail not be blacktopped Mr Middleton suggested adequate signage so people will be aware of the trail amenity Mr Zoller asked if there would be a trail along the upper wall Ms Stefan said that is an idea for future development, there are safety and ADA issues involved with that location, she noted Mr Hultman, seconded by Mr Wald, moved to adjourn at 8 50 p m , all in favor Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 3 • MEMO • ,• To Planning Commission / `/ From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Additional Information for Variance request for 216 West Wilkins Street Date May 5, 2000 This item has been readvertised for public heanng after withdrawal at the last Commission meeting The applicant has requested a 864 square foot, 3-stall garage with storage above rather than the onginal 2-stall garage Also, additional decking and stairs to the rear side and of the residence has been added The applicant has eliminated one of the entryways to Unit `B" Other conditions of approval in staff report for 4-10-00 CPC meeting remain Conditions of Approval 1 A utility easement as approved by the engineenng department shall be recorded before building permits are issued 2 All City Building Code requirements shall be met 3 This approval is for a duplex, 2 residential units 4 Any change in use or occupancy shall require City approval 5 The Y2 story under the roof of the garage shall be used for storage only 6 There shall be one entrance to Unit A and one entrance to Unit B 7 This approval is for a duplex 8 Any change in occupancy or use shall require City approval Attachment Staff report for CPC 4-10-00 meeting • • • Planning Commission Apnl 10, 2000 along Fifth Street, where there currently is no parking area, the impact on the residential character of the neighborhood, loss of view, appearance/height of the building In discussion at the table, Mr Middleton suggested the possibility of redesigning the parking area to accommodate all the necessary parking in the front to alleviate concerns about traffic/safety on Fifth Street Mr Zoller said he thought the plans would improve the appearance of the existing building and agreed that he thought it would be possible to address some concerns by revising the parking layout, Mr Hultman agreed with that observation Mr Rheinberger said even if the number of employees isn't increasing, the proposal represents an increase in business use in a residential neighborhood — a perception of an intensity of use Mr Wald spoke of the potential for increased traffic and future growth Mr Fontaine also expressed a concern about intensifying the commercial use Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Gag, moved to deny the request based on an expansion of commercial use in a residential area Motion to deny passed 5-3, with Mrs Bealka, Mr Hultman and Mr Zoller voting no Mr Fontaine noted the applicant can appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council Case No V/00-15 A variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required, 26 5 feet requested) for construction of a two -car garage at 401 N Third St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Howard Berg, applicant Mr Berg noted he could meet the required setback, however, he would like to keep the new garage in the same location as the existing structure because the north wall of the garage acts as a portion of the retaining wall along the north property line The garage will be gabled on the north and south sides for drainage purposes Mr Zoller suggested there would be a gutter to prevent erosion of the yard Mr Middleton, seconded by Mr Rheinberger, moved approval as conditioned Mr Zoller asked that the motion be amended to include an additional condition that there be a gutter on the east side of the structure, Mr Middleton and Mr Rhemberger accepted the amendment to the motion Amended motion passed unanimously Case No V/00-16 A vanance to the Duplex Residential requirements for an 800-square foot addition to an existing duplex at 216 W Wilkins St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Marcia Kilbourne, applicant This case was continued Mr Fontaine allowed three neighbonng residents who were in the audience to speak to the case Expressing concerns about increased traffic and the number of cars already parking on the street were Todd Sharpe, 1003 N Fifth St, Bnan Kogler, 1016 N Fifth St , and Jon Shimota, 1015 N Fifth St , directly across the street from the applicant Mr Kogler and Mr Slumota suggested the duplex currently is actually being used as a tnplex Mr Fontaine and Ms Fitzgerald advised them they could make a formal complaint regarding the tnplex if they wished Mr Fontaine advised the three to phone City Hall to see if the case will be on next month's agenda Case No V/00-17 A vanance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 28 feet requested) for construction of a front porch addition at 125 S Greeley St in the RB, Two Family Residential Distnct Dennis Harcey, applicant 2 PL —.NING APPLICATION REVIEW FOAM CASE NO V/00-16 Planning Commission Date Apnl 10, 2000 • Project Location 216 West Wilkins Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Marcia Kilbourne Type of Application Variance Project Description A request to expand the size of a legal non -conforming duplex by 800 square feet Discussion The request is to add 800 square feet to an existing duplex The Planning Commission previously approved a vanance to enlarge and relocate one of the duplex units (see Case No V/98-10 attached) In the RB Distnct, 10,000 square feet is required for a duplex This lot contains 8,437 square feet The current request is to add a two -level, 800 square foot addition to the existing duplex Four hundred square feet would be on the street or main level and 400 square feet would be added to the basement level Currently there are two units A & B in the structure Unit A, the front unit, has 3 bedrooms and 1 bath and •ontains 1,232 square ft Unit A would remain the same with the variance Unit B has three levels The basement level currently has two bedrooms and one bath The main or street level a bath The second level has 3 bedrooms The existing Unit B contains 5 bedrooms and two bathrooms in 2,116 square feet The proposal is for a two level basement and main level 800 square foot addition The main level would be a living room and bedroom In the basement, would be a family room and bedroom The proposed Unit B would contain 7 bedrooms and 2 baths and have 2,916 square feet The applicant is also proposing a two -car garage with storage above (under the roof) The review is for expansion of the duplex The proposal does meet setbacks, height and lot coverage requirements The existing lot size is 8,427 square feet, 10,000 square feet is required Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 There shall be one entrance to Unit A and one entrance to Unit B 2 This approval is for a duplex 3 Any change in occupancy or use shall require City approval Attachments Application • • MEMO • • To Planning Commission 1L From Klayton Eckles, City Engineer Subject Comments Regarding Case No V/00-16 Date Apnl 6, 2000 The Engineenng Department has comments regarding the proposed expansion at 216 West Wilkins Street The proposed addition would not be possible if the City had not completed the storm sewer project on the property last year This property was suffenng from significant flooding potential pnor to the project that included a storm pipe on the property Prior to the granting of a building permit, the applicant should be required to sign an easement over to the City for the storm pipe (Note The applicant has agreed to the easement) City staff will provide the easement document to the applicant for signature The other concern relates to the grading The proposed garage is in the area of a steep slope and close to the neighboring property A grading plan prepared by a competent professional or firm should be a requirement • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 va% 73/, ' ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance $70 Conditional or Special Use Permit $50/200 Design Review $25 Planned Unit Development* $500 �LVariance $7 200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Subdivision* $100+$50 Resubdivision $100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 2i6 J GO/L/(JA/ Assessor's Parcel No 02/ �. . , 3-4/ f'/ Zoning District Description of Project S/ 0' Sri Fr- 14O, / -7-r4A/ /NO ,616 S8 FT C'OUAVD/° 77() V/ "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith it - all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner /-4-eCix A-//e-te)seiV&' Mailing AddressZ" w /L<//" Telephone No 1,0-OW? Signature-,f?.-/< ' " Representative Mailing Address Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) 63 x ✓_ 3 t' Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal 2- /C,' Accessory 410 PRoPOS p / 8 Total building floor Area /D/!v X 3 sq ft Existing ✓ O /C sq ft Proposed 41� � 4/00 A/AE q f'TZ 'Y2 g 6,4RA ( Paved Impervious Area O sq ft 71.12XoE Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 STREET 22 36 Io 8'o w W cc 0) 1 B19 313 ' 303 209 11313 1307 314 308 304 ' I 216 210 0 07 1305 AVENUE < CA 403 1 § icfM 1 14 1207 04 1203 0, � ICI 1 STREET city 315 CO AV UE 309 M 1215 N N 1206 i _MC` CO,cO r; I1114 tiQ o r, h CV1 �e' r n M ' M M M o 7 I� City F5 NI r' 404 TREET STREET 1016 S 'DIes k 925 I 924 921 924 V/00-16 iW L921 0) rn 310 306 0 i0) • co o 0 d- d- a 406 211313 820 845 816 Location Map CO N 214 24 O N O rn 21 1 808 W 0) cc cc 0 cc 0 Z 0 820 Z 1224 1223 1218 1212 108 1206 106 WEST STILLWATER AVE 121 1124 11- 1120 120 106- WEST WI KINS STREET 1022 1016 07 ' 1001 WEST ASPEN STREET 921 920 903 WEST ELM STREET 821 807 R2IW R2OW RJ9W R22W R_IW R2aW Monty Map 0 201 Scale in Feet Tilt rYV h OwiMd mryisko .�a npaiatn W LEM:. r toy Carty =Fp be wad b realm. Sur Wd,.Cap Sways' Ma P•calas lard rennOrn - .... grim mm • IECEDWIE. APR 6 2000 D J --rb TEE PLANK t4b Cd rnM6_4:A t u\160J ..a_s_t_gf �— E x P1ZES� M4 CcINKft2N S W NTa RE6A2i74 "cam J t t o ( T14E 26-S`ACnic. Dioccr `S c2oSS 1-14E Sr2ET 20t- r-Y-e 1-Nc-14E coupLE, `YEARS 6.0k AtJ AN 2 TtocJ v.IAS M A 9 f -ro i U NS t-+ o M E C l-t A tJ G t NJ G IT r ao M A S t N/G L E 1-+1‘-•I61 INPro 011PLEx. T n10vJ A?'EtQS TWAT T t-u t 5 k Oki ` t-I 2NCD 10 A T 2 i -' L K, C1•10f T (-IC a) vLAiLigovES Arlo 3 sEPEgarE EwrrzAi\iCES, U.i00L9 1-14K nIEK_aDt rt»(-J-rUcZ&) ► r tPJ c� A F0J(Z-eLEx 1" µERE Aac AL2EAD'Y 3 -4 ADD\ ["‘otJAL CA125 PAt2 E 1 f�1 T4IC STt2EE1-- Cd c r AS Tc-EtZE t 5 Lt P-4 tt oa. • 1.10 v r ' i-a ET 14 (3 , AM CoN1 CEP.IZD T14AT San- S Lo€S dr TEE S-rrZEET W IT1-f CABS 4N`L Mc3CZ 26N TE 2� a. LLOvJED TD NlpVC: N Ni • tom} Suter NAAR-N cfE L -rafa c A►ZC AL(Z AO1 rto0 Manly PE&Lf v‘NJAr TNdt 5 LGCA-toi.J1 AND 'r %Ar NorwE2 ExPAS�ooJ vJoL)L_c OrJL9 A00 'CZ. T N E" Pao G. Le -'1 , • t'L€AS€ CoNJ4 t0EZ T O' S elE raizE APPcZaJcNJG -rNe UA2tCE f_444/ti 1c 5 , STH • /jS 0 • • Y 0tii f-/ 3 54- / /34-7-7t Ci`on el Uft. l t' TSu S- /) 2 Z Ij ij4 Elco k �l / 1�i �-. P��r ��A/� /�-c( I (-Li Z.14,13eor g 00 $ of h �",,'' /3.ed/ 4- 3 St-74,u. - "Y SF HOLISe /O/6 yc o 66Y 2280 S Q F i LOT /io=Lo/ 4-7 SQ Fr ExisT/NG @OME) SQ F T A OO iTio,-/ SQ FT GA%AGc TOTAL SQ rT 7dg oo FT OcCK $ 74 Sot hrt '17 'Jh OP ri/Vcn rlous E SNAOCO b • 11 �R�3 U w' u cal BRr bue fru/v a8 0 0 GRoNT /ST FL00A 2/6 ►W »'/LK,NS • • • 7-',........... - / i 6tb rbin—z- 9 oi( ti1' 1 EXtSTIMV- CASE El = NEW BeAsr= • • • v/JJLrEO CEILINGS -51 /b o Ex, ST/M- vHOUSE /IVSIOE Smi0E0 AA'A Ly6050( fl zo 0 KIr416N MST ING- HOUSC FRc DIN Zto Al1H0 - 0 F,c n t,r boor_ IrRONr UM"- 2,6 a w,ca nrs • • • • • • March 9, 1998 the existing property line, subject to a five-foot easement Mr Rhemberger accepted the amendment to his motion Mr Weidner seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/98-10 A vanance for relocation and expansion of a second residential unit on an 8,302 square foot lot (10,000 square feet required) in the RB Duplex Residential distnct at 216 W Wilkins St Marcia Kilbourne, applicant Ms Kilbourne was present She objected to the conditions of approval relating to grading/drainage She said she was not doing any excavation of the lot Mr Russell said that such a condition is standard procedure if the applicant is putting soil against the wall as shown in submitted plans Mr Russell suggested removing condition of approval No 3, since it is repetitive, and adding language "if grading is proposed" to condition of approval No 5 Ms Kilbourne explained that due to water problems, the duplex unit was moved from the basement, and a new unit constructed behind the garage The basement will now be used as a family room Mr Zoller asked why a vanance is required Mr Russell said a vanance is needed since the request involves enlarging/intensifying a non -conforming use, specifically increasing the duplex unit from one to three bedrooms The main point of discussion centered on the fact that building permits have been issued for the project Ms Kilbourne stated that she had the permits and was not told that a vanance was needed Mr Weidner said the only issue for the Planning Commission to consider is whether to allow expansion of a nonconforming use The issue of the applicant being granted building permits and not advised that a vanance was required is an issue for the City Council to deal with, he said Mr Wald said the problem is not the applicant's fault — she is caught in the middle Mr Zoller moved to approve case No V/98-10, eliminating condition of approval No 3 and adding language "if grading is proposed" to condition of approval No 5 (No 4), Mr Zoller said he was making his motion of approval based on the hardship created by the water problem and the fact that a duplex existed before Mr Rheinberger seconded the motion Motion passed 4-2, with Mr Weidner and Mr Fontaine voting no Case No V/98-11 A variance request for reduction of a drainage/utility easement to accommodate construction of a swimming pool in the rear yard of a single-family residence at 263 Pinendge Lane in the RA Single Family Residential Distnct Todd and Kristine Wilson, applicants j • MEMO • • To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director r2,--- Subject Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment Changing the Zoning of 63 Acres of Land from Duplex Residential, RB to Central Business Distnct, CBD Case No ZAM/00-02 Date May 4, 2000 The request is to rezone 63 acres of land from RB, Duplex Residential to CBD, Central Business Distnct (see attached map) The request is made to accommodate the construction of a two -level, 2,400 square foot ticket office for the Andiamo boats The site is located on the west side of the railroad tracks just south of the South Main Parking Lot To the south of the site, the zoning is RB, Duplex Residential and IB, Heavy Industnal Further to the south of the site, the Aiple Property Park is planned for improvement in the future Access through the rezoned site to the park area is cntical to park access and pedestnan use of the park The rezoning is in part due to the need to remove the existing ticket office from the nver as required by the Corp of Engineers and DNR (see attached letter) Recommendation Approval Attachments Rezoning map Brian N Toder •Admitted in Minnesota and Colorado • • September 22, 1996 LAW OFFICES Brian N Toder, Ltd A Pnoresszortu. CORPosAT[oN SUITE 1622 PIONEER BUILDING 336 NoRru RoBERT STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (651) 224-5632 TELECOPIER. (651) 224 0390 Molly Shodeen Area Hydrologist Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metro Waters 1200 Warner Road St Paul, MN 55106-6793 Daruel Seemon U S Army Corps of Engineers 190 Fifth Street East Saint Paul, MN 55101-1638 RE DNR Perrrut Number 89-6206 U S Corps/Engs Permit 96-05280-IP-RJA Dear Ms Shodeen and Mr Seemon bnan®toder com This letter serves to memonalize an agreement reached at a meeting September 10, 1999 among the Corps, the DNR, Stillwater City Planner Steve Russel and my clients, St Croix Boat and Packet Company and Dick Anderson (collectively Mr Anderson ), with respect to the above referenced permits First and foremost, my client, Mr Anderson, has asked me to convey to use his most sincere apologies for failing to seek an authonzation from the DNR to reconstruct the docks that are the subject matter of the penruts He advises that he erroneously believed that, by acquiring permission to rebuild the ice -damaged docks from the Corps m 1997, he was satisfying his requirement to obtain concurrent authonzahon from the DNR He admits that he was wrong in so assuming, and assures you in the strongest possible terms that this will never happen again, he will deal with each agency independently as each permit may require He will provide his personal written assurances that this will never happen again The Docks It is our understanding that all parties agree that, since the new construction did not matenally reconfigure the docking scheme', an after -the -fact authorization from the DNR is either in l Tlie pernutted, wood docks were severely damaged by migrating ice and were replaced with steel docks of approximately the same dimensions • • Ms Shodeen and Mr Seemon September 22, 1999 Page Two place or will be forthcoming We would appreciate a letter from the DNR to that effect for our files The Green Float Mr Anderson will not apply to the DNR or the Corps for any kind of permit involving the green float, provided the two agencies advise that the green float may remain m its present situs until May 11, 2000 Mr Anderson promises to dispose of the float before that date in a manner satisfactory to both agencies he Floating Office Mr Anderson will use his best efforts to find a substitute shore -based facihty to replace the floating office To keep the agencies well-appnsed of his efforts, he will document the same and provide (at least three) reports of his progress The parties agreed that the end of the year would be a reasonable deadline Please be advised that a dialogue has already begun After the aforementioned meeting, Mr Anderson met with Mr Russel and had substantive discussions about constructing a new facility Mr Russel opined that the City would look very favorably at such a project and invited Mr Anderson to submit preliminary plans Mr Anderson agreed to contact an architect he has dealt with previously to get the matter moving y yours, Brian N Toder BNT/tdb cc Steve Russel A • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/V/DR/00-19 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location South of Main Street Parking Lot Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Mark Balay, representing Andiamo Enterpnses Type of Application Special Use Permit and Vanance Project Description A special use permit and vanance for the construction of a two -level, 2,400 square foot ticket office/storage building and to parking Discussion The application is for construction of a ticket office and storage area for the Andiamo excursion boats Other proposed improvements include paving an 8-foot pedestnan path and constructing a trash enclosure (on City property) A related zoning amendment would rezone the southerly portion of the site owned by Mr Anderson from RB, Duplex Residential to CBD, Central Business Distnct Vanances is needed for parking, two building signs and building setbacks A special use permit is needed for the office use Because the site is located in the Downtown Planning District, design review is required for all improvements The site proposed for development is owned by the applicant, City of Stillwater and Union Pacific Railroad (see property ownership map) The applicant currently has a lease with the City and railroad to use the property The site is next to the Flood Plain District and care must be taken to make sure the lowest level of the building is above the flood elevation 693 5' The proposal is to construct a two -level, 1,200 square feet on each level office building just south of the South Main parking lot and west of the railroad tracks A parking lot and 8-foot paved pathway is proposed to connect the boat boarding runways (north and south) with the ticket office This pathway could eventually provide pedestnan access along the nver connecting Nelson Street and Lowell Park with the future Aiple Property Park A new trash enclosure is proposed on the City property just south of the Bnck Alley trash enclosure (on City property) A portion of the paved pathway appears to be on City property as well The request for the office on land outside of the Bluffland/Shoreland District is due in part to the DNR's request that the applicant remove the floating ticket office from the nver As proposed, the ticket office is a walk out, two -level structure with ticket office on top level I • • • The building is setback 11 feet from the west property line and 8 feet from the east property hne Fifteen parking spaces are shown next to and south of the office building Other cars and service vehicles park on the City property on the north portion of the site Street nght of way is to the front of the site and railroad nght of way to the rear The unusual site shape provides a basis for a setback vanance The office building design and trash enclosure design was approved by the Histonc Preservation Commission on May 1, 2000 (see attached staff report) A major sanitary sewer line runs along the railroad tracks in proximity to the site requinng setback siting from the line As can be seen on the ownership map, the parking proposed for the site is accessed off of railroad property If the owner can not come to terms with the railroad, most of the parking spaces could not be used (parking vanance) Also, a variance is needed for the two signs proposed One sign is allowed by the ordinance HPC has reviewed the design of the trash enclosure This application is dependent on approving the rezoning Recommendation Approval as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 The siting of the building shall be approved by the City Engineer to protect access to the sanitary sewer line 2 An overall site drainage plan showing direction of and methods of controlling runoff shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Engineenng Department before building permit approval 3 A detailed landscape plan showing plant size and location shall be approved by the Community Development Director before a building permits is issued 4 The floor elevation of the basement of the office building shall be located above the 100 year flood level (693 5') as certified by a site survey 5 Lighting of the pathway shall be approved by the Community Development Director (fixture type and location) 6 Aesthetic trash enclosures shall be provided and maintained at key locations, i e , ramp Office parking to accommodate customer needs 7 The 8-foot pedestnan pathway through the site shall be available for public use and easement recorded 8 The restroom in the office shall be available to customers dunng regular hours of operation 9 The existing storage shed shall be removed and replaced by the trash enclosure to the north and 1,200 square foot storage area under the office 10 Parking spaces shall be a gravel pervious surface and not paved Attachments Application and plans Planning Admin Form Page 1 of 2 • • • PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 430-8820 Case No V Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No Action Requested Fee Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* Vanance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee $70 $50/$200 $25 $500 $70/$200 $500 $300 $100+$50/lot $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see Step 3, Filing the Application) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION f t'rft o,r Af 4dv sr Pq,e>til6-1--.02- Address of Project Gkofti.,0 j 1 ( T!}I1 t .Assessor's Parcel No r Zoning Distnct c 0 / Description of Project t'z— ' I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct If further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" 7444 i Property Owner t'7 I tmo' j�-Ee.)14 Representative 141 'RX S Mailing Address 3O l tea, L 4.0 Mailing Address ►/ D til-e Telephone No S i —Li 3 L7 ) Z3q Telephone No 4, 5 I -- 4/ 3d -- 3 1 Z Signature � _ Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION http //www ci st llwater mn us/cityhall/departments/comm_dev/planform html 3/19/00 • • • HPC APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/DR/00-19 HPC Date May 1, 2000 Project Location South of Main Street Municipal Parking Lot — no address available Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicant's Name Mark Balay, representing Andiamo Enterpnses Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of boat ticket office plans and signage for Andiamo Enterprises Discussion The Commission reviewed the concept of this project at the February 7, 2000 HPC meeting Architect, Mark Balay, has refined it according to HPC's and Community Development's suggestions Attached is a letter from Steve Russell The 1250 square foot building will be sided with corrugated metal sheeting — galvanized finish The various levels of roofs will have asphalt shingles There will be a walkout basement on the east side All windows will be non -reflective glass with cross -hatching detail All mechanical equipment will be inside the building except for a small condenser on the south side of the structure An enclosed dumpster is proposed near the Dock Restaurant's dumpster site A dark green wooden fence would be used to enclose the dumpster The applicant needs to procure the City Councils approval to place the dumpster at the shown location because it is City property Building lighting will consist of four "goose- neck" fixtures, two on the east side, and two on the west face of the building Any other lighting would be pedestrian lights along a planned eight -foot asphalt walkway The light fixture would be similar to the Downtown decorative lighting fixtures There is enough existing lighting for the parking lot The applicant will also be seeking a variance to the parking from the Planning Commission Signage if approved, will be on the north and west side of the building The signs would not be lit, and will be the same colors as the signage on the paddle boats The lettenng is red on a deep bronze background Conditions of Approval • • • 1 All changes to the approved plan would be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 2 No additional signage 3 Staff will review and approve the sign fabncator's final drawings and issue the sign permit 4 Landscape plan be reviewed and approved by staff 5 All landscaping shall be installed before final inspection Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The project is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines Attachments Application/Site Plan/Building Elevations • • • Date May 2, 2000 To Stillwater Planning Commission Steve Russell, Community Development Director Stillwater City Council From Mary' A 'and Ron I R Nelson 509 Broadway St So Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Re Case No ZAM/00-2 Request by Andiamo Enterpnses to Rezone from RB, Two Family Residential Distnct to CBD, Central Business Distnct We are opposed to the rezoning request of Andiamo Enterpnses as brought forth by Mark Balay Our reasons are 1 The area where the building will be located is too small 2 The building does not have public restrooms for their customers 3 With the addition of the new 500 passenger boat, there will be too much traffic in the area making it a safety hazard People come, wait to get on the second excursion of the boat The amving boat must debark its passengers before embarking the waiting passengers At a class reunion, we spent over a half hour waiting for the boat to return to shore In short, there are too many and too large a boats for the area 4 Andiamo Enterpnses has not been a good neighbor We have expenenced excessive noise up on the hill at hours well beyond normal waking hours (i e 2 30 AM) When we have requested one on one, to have this stopped we were harassed by Dick Anderson by his saying to us "Don't you come down here no more " 5 We have been told by Dick Anderson that he can not control the noise factor We were also told by Steve Russell that the noise factor probably can not be controlled 6 We have been awakened in the middle of the mght and prevented from getting back to sleep by people partying in the boat slips that Andiamo Enterpnses rents out Our fear is that with no one taking responsibihty for instituting or enforcing noise safeguards, the noise factor will escalate further with the proposed zoning change Currently, the property is zoned as Two Family Residential, a zoning change to Central Business Distnct will result in greater unruliness and louder noises at inappropnate hours 7 There are several long term planning issues that need to be addressed regarding this request A What is the overall plan for the Aiple property? B What is the encroachment factor for Andiamo Enterpnses on the railroad hne9 C Is granting the zoning request setting a dangerous precedence for additional rezoning requests that will move Stillwater's shorehne away from its natural beauty position • • • 8 What is the fiscal impact of Andiamo Enterprises on the city of Stillwater? It is our understanding that Stillwater receives $3000 total Federal reimbursement for Andiamo Enterprises' liquor license which covers all of their boats, compared to $2500 per tavern for liquor license Andiamo Enterpnses pays $6,000 dock fees for their prime river advantage Are they being good citizens and carrying their fair share for the costs of the community's infrastructure? 9 We are also experiencing the bright fights that Andiamo Enterpnses has installed to accommodate the new 500 passenger boat making five boats parked in a small area We are requesting that Andiamo Enterpnses place reflectors on these to hold the light down to the ground It is so bright on the hill that the little wrens don't know if it is daytime or nighttime, and sing to us around the clock The ambience that Stillwater is trying to generate is not one of rowdy parties in the middle of the night By working together to respect each other we can have the beauty of the boats and a bucolic community as well Thank you for your attention in these matters E • HW WEO GWie Mt4-rt.�1i'D'PI+ LY '� 8 D w Viet-e 2 AYR.I4t26� fh+8- C�4RJV..IA CJ 1�Yi4 OU LIMO 6VEt2 Aul?..5 BOND 12 0 A13.0V£41Z 40a" M 7Lt I71 woof:. EDGI�� Y I ROM if�LrwlcrT- v 'PVC/ LAY,. ._..wren- f e-LI -em.0 W / 3 D .rn yED L�^I'TEYLI h10 - O Ci �ID i1Er> E 04E L0O Co P IC4 12,6,42Kt NG WI- 4vur44ELw • fD-r 1. VEfl • t-W/EL — L_ Ul T L�VATJoN " 50 ekA VWCr PSoFF I"r Wt�tDrav-! � Doeiz �61NG= Wo01? W 0-41- 9a+r�I > �NISiI.- - jLL£X ED'�I-'Y �X+Ir —r J AS171+rst_-r _4 t+tNGt�� _ - _ JI ME"TtaV S-44E6TIt�lC - icM1.1ZC-8 FiN lSt} t&i a a� 00 SHEET r,o•61- EL-C-iArl7N %+°- I' 0" OF • • 0 0 0 II's 0m O 0 O 0 5_11LLVIATEI MN &WK S Y_ t} zrs _ _ 110 EA5-r MYRRH -51- - 6T1L-t-WRI , MN — cosl-L/3O 3312 0 m 0 0 A m /cc' -.0S r-l�al -Z Sn qS NJrt _ a��-l11,N_ -v of SJ?�N t� try w� S > ri-y vl NY-1 N+�-I 59I?:1tal-Nj 04JVIGN49i m a g i m o u m m m m N °m I on I L I I I ItO VI ,s4 2 2‘# tq 0S fW z 0 a 21s9-Q IY- L -zc3ca..9 NW `zi rlv 1 ij4 ' r v3 i`L42}}0W ' ...1-`3d. O1l-I • -AlI'�"i- ' •%�1-t� 9 '.il11 NI kJ (� /Y\-riUS' __!-1•I. W 340-1 .i' ct 3U' 0 le u x u 0 0 m m a N W�cF-�'v��� �Sf2391i t olt\IV1 Q'Nd 0,4 n»hnpvai ro,.6+.w soup-xw Ors/ r, 2166 061 (t69) Pi MSS AMAMI! n,,A015 an n s sans n+rn ton o Y1V i Ra S d°A I IIS A sLOil>tan V 1 V 8 NO041117530 11N! 3LV0 Have obi as +e MOO on 1]0U0C OO/--r J) .rw pZija Lb 3nSL VIVO 'DNA w S (I)0 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/00-20 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location Brick Street north of Ohve Street Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Jaren Johnson, representing Sprint PCS(personal communication system) Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A Special Use Permit for a 100 foot high monopole telecommunications tower and receptions of PCS telecommunications signals Discussion The apphcant is requesting a Special Use Permit to construct a monopole telecommunications facility located on the Northwest corner of the mtersections of Brick Street South and Olive Street West The leased area is 1 033 acres (45,000 square feet) The tower will be 100 feet high and will be available for co -location The unstaffed equipment electronic cabinets will be located on the ground next to the monopole tower There is an intensification of use of this area and with the lack of re -platting the site, a 20 foot drainage and utility easement along the west side of Brick Street should be provided to the City The easement will be recorded pnor to releasmg the building permit The application meets the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordmance, CD31 123, Subd 4, Antenna and towers m residential dristicts (RA,RB, RCM, RCH) See attached ordmance Conditions of Approval 1 All conditions of the Antenna Ordinance CD31 123, Subd 4 must be met and mamtamed 2 A 20 foot drainage and utility easement shall be provided on the west side of Brick Street pnor to releasing the buildmg permit Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The proposed use will not be mjurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the pubhc welfare and will be m harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Elevation Drawmgs/Antenna Ordinance r • • • • • Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area 45,000 square feet Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal 100 Accessory Revised 5/22/97 • Case No -31( Date Filed 31 66 Fee Paid Jai / B Receipt No '1?3 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance x Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unrt Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/430 $25 $5Q0 $70/3P0 $500 $300 $10Q♦$50/4 $100 *An escrow fee rs also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attacled) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supportlog material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Brick Street Assessor's Parcel No Zoning Distnct RB Descnption of Project Erection of monopole tower for transmission and receptions of PCS telecommunications signals, telecommunic atior "I hereby state the foregoing statements and ell data, information and evidence submitted herewith m all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comp*/ with the permit if ft is granted and used " Property Owner Bob Smith Representative Everest Group-Jaren Jo nson Mailing Address 3 Golf Villa Drive Mailing Address 2126 5th Street Port orange, FL 32124 White hear Lake, -nv 551 (r — Telephone No cin4-7hn_n41 7 Telephone No 612-578-6247 Signature Signature °t52-53 - SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total building floor Area sq Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided • rn 1- a 0 11 136 124 2411 281 320 STR FFr 112 100 125 113 101 224 218 212 1616 225 219 213 WEST 1807 —310 0 390 406- d1d- 1- w w 1- F OLIVE C) rn ti P- w 04 1'J 1- STREET 315' t 16 1708 WEST NA 1703 Location Mt 411 12' 417 /420 w w co w • 18 1612 320 2 415 404 414 0 a0 0 0 U re 113 1Y5 14 0 WEST r 0 CN 1524 0) 0 L00 32f 403 OAK 406 411 427 410 4 8 1 w w O R22W R2IW MOW Vianuty Map 0 220 Scale In Feet SAa dr*.b ihodmild ecai1 b �Yb�o nepudD SomortinAlcartaurfr,a. a!a • • • Application for Conditional Use Permit Brick Street Stillwater, MN 55082 March 31, 2000 Applicant SprintPCS 9801 W Higgins Road, Suite 220 Rosemount, Illinois 60018 Submitted by The Everest Group 2126 Fifth Street White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • • • OPENING STATEMENT In its pursuit of providing the highest quality digital wireless service, SpnntPCS ("Spnnt") proposes to construct a wireless communication facility located on the Northwest corner of the intersections of Bnck Street South and Olive Street West near the existing red and white colored guyed wire tower, within the RB (Two Family Residential) Zoning Distnct Spnnt will be leasing ground space to place the necessary antennas and ground space to place the accompanying unstaffed electronic communications equipment The equipment cabinets will be located on the ground next to the monopole tower The leased area on the ground encompasses 1 033 acres (45 000 square feet) The total amount of property owned by the Lessor is 3 5 acres (152,460 square feet) The entire antenna facility will be wholly contained within the leased premises The proposed monopole will have a height of 100 feet and will be available for co -location As part of Spnnt's ongoing development and improvement of its wireless network, system engineers have identified the need for a new facility to serve the area in and around the west -central part of Stillwater The required location for the new facility was determined by computer modeling that evaluates population density, topography and current antenna system capacity The potential location area is known as the "Search Ring" This Search Ring represents the area in which a facility must be located to allow it to function as an integral unit in the antenna gnd system After a thorough search of the nng the site located off of Bnck Street South was found to be the most appropriate based on technological and aesthetic concerns Spnnt's proposed facility will enhance the current uses and enjoyment of the surrounding property by providing wireless coverage for business, family safety and emergency situations The proposed facility will not cause harm to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare As a condition of its license from the FCC, Spnnt's technology does not cause interference with any other form of communication, whether public or pnvate To the contrary, Spnnt's technology provides vital communications in emergency situations and will be commonly used by local residents and emergency personnel to protect the general public's health, safety and welfare Wireless telephone technology provides many benefits to the communities it serves These services mclude, but are not limited to, the following . 911 program allowing motonsts to summon aid and report dangerous situations Support for emergency services by providing wireless communications to paramedics, firefighters, and law enforcement agencies The ability to transmit data allowing for immediate access to vital information A backup system to the land -line system in the event of a natural or man-made disaster Immediate access to national hazardous matenal data bases from the site of a hazardous material spill Communication capabilities in remote areas, enhancing the safety of travelers by allowing immediate access to emergency assistance Support for the busy lives of people in the city, reducing stress and mcreasmg productivity • • • SITE ANALYSIS Dunng Spnnt's site selection process it first determines what the requirements are from the governing municipality Once informed, the acquisition specialists search the area designated by the engineers at Spnnt In the city of Stillwater, towers that satisfy a conditional use permit process and demonstrate that all zoning requirements will be met in the location that the tower is to be constructed will be allowed In Spnnt's search for an acceptable location in the west -central area of Stillwater, only a few potential sites were discovered The New Heights school was an option, but is not as viable an option as the proposed site both for location and aesthetics The Stillwater water tank is another option but is nearly outside of the search nng and again is not as good a site as the proposed site Any height lower than what is required by the engineers or any site outside the optimum area of the search nng will most likely result in the need for an additional facility in the area The proposed location is on an RB zoned parcel of property, with other RB zoned property surrounding it There currently exists a guyed wire tower on the proposed location that would remain Therefore, to meet the coverage and capacity needs of the surrounding area, the best feasible location, for both technical reasons and aesthetic reasons, is on the property owned by Bob Smith located on Bnck Street South, Just North of Olive Street West • • • CITY OF STILLWATER Findings Required for Conditional Use Permit 1 The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations The special use will be in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Stillwater City Ordinance Wireless telephones provide an alternate communication system which has repeatedly proven its effectiveness in emergency situations and is commonly being utilized by police and fire departments to protect the general public's health, safety and welfare Therefore, the granting of the Special Use will be in conformance with the general and specific purposes imposed by the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Official Comprehensive Plan The proposed wireless facility will be located within the RB (Two Family) Zoning District There will be little impact on the character of the locality, with no adverse effect on existing or future development in the area To the contrary, enhanced cellular technology will have a positive influence on the development of this area 2 Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed The conditional use will conform to the applicable regulations of the RB Zoning District, Section 31-4 of the Stillwater City Code (Regulation of Radio and Television Towers), and any additional conditions necessary to protect the public interest Pursuant to the City of Stillwater Zoning Ordinance, Section 31-4, titled Regulation of Radio and Television Towers, proposed use is found under Subdivision 4 as an "Antenna and Towers in Residential Districts " The proposed facility will be built to conform to all City of Stillwater Zoning Ordinance/Code provisions, including the regulations concerning height, setbacks, and bulk regulations The only utilities necessary for this facility are electricity and telephone The wireless facility is an unstaffed facility and, accordingly, there will be no impact to the existing traffic patterns nor will there be any need for additional access roads Site plans submitted together with this apphcation, reflect that provisions have been made for utilities and access As this facility is unstaffed, no drainage, sanitation, refuse disposal, water and sewer, or school facilities will be necessary The facility is electronically monitored and connected to a sophisticated central computer system which will detect any breach of secunty or other danger Existing police and fire protection is more than adequate to provide security for this facility 3 The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community • • • The establishment, maintenance and operation of this PCS facility will be wholly contained within the leased parcel Due to the size of the lease parcel and the nature of the surrounding uses, this installation will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of any other property in the immediate vicinity nor will it be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare PCS technology does not interfere with any other form of communication, whether public or private To the contrary, wireless technology provides vital communications in emergency situations and will commonly be used by local residents and emergency personnel to protect the general public's health, safety and welfare This facility will not have an effect on the property values within the neighborhood, but rather, its presence will enhance and provide wireless communications to the residents of the City of Stillwater This structure is an unstaffed facility which will be wholly contained within the lease parcel Maintenance visits will occur no more than once a month in a station wagon or van -type vehicle Therefore, no traffic will be generated by the proposed facility The only utilities needed for this facility are telephone and electricity, both of which will be provided if not already available The facility will not generate any vibrations, smoke or particulate matter, toxic or noxious matter, odorous matter, fire or explosive hazards, glare, heat, liquid or solid waste or radioactive matenals It will not impair an adequate supply of light or air to adjacent property Therefore, no nuisances will be generated by the proposed facility Wireless telephone technology provides many benefits to the communities it serves These services include, but are not limited to, the following • 911 program allowing motorists to summon aid and report dangerous situations • Support for emergency services by providing wireless communications to paramedics, firefighters, and law enforcement agencies • The ability to transmit data allowing for immediate access to vital information • A backup system to the land -line system in the event of a natural or man-made disaster • Immediate access to national hazardous material data bases from the site of a hazardous material spill • Communication capabilities in remote areas, enhancing the safety of travelers by allowing immediate access to emergency assistance • Support for the busy lives of people in the city/villages reducing stress and increasing productivity • • • 31-3 STILLWATER CODE that the premises are left in a safe and sanitary condition All foundation struc- tures shall be removed to a depth of 18 inches below the finished grade of the earth (9) Cause any sewer line to be plugged with a concrete stopper and the water to be shut off if the original building is within the city The holder of the permit shall notify gas, electric and other utilities to remove their services (10) If the building is relocated in the city, complete within 90 days after removal, all remodeling, additions or repairs as indi- cated in the application, in any document filed in support thereof or in any bwlding permit issued in connection therewith (11) Take all reasonable precautions to secure the building and to reduce danger of any member of the public until the building is set on its foundation and any remodeling, additions or repairs, descnbed in the ap- plication, have been completed including, but not limited to a Locking all doors and windows, b Providing sufficient support or brac- ing so as to stabilize the building to prevent it or any part thereof from sliding, slipping, falling or moving, and c Erecting or maintaining a secunty fence or wall, the base of which shall be no higher than four inches and the top of which shall be at least four feet above the surface of the ground and which shall enclose the entire building as well as the excavation for the foundation Subd 7 Lcabiltty to city The holder of a per- mit shall be liable jointly and severally for any expenses, damages or costs paid or incurred by the city as a result of the issuance of a permit or the taking or failure to take any action by the holder of the permit of the city under this section The city may take or cause to be taken any of the following actions and may retain so much of the cash deposit necessary to reimburse itself for any costs or expenses incurred as a result thereof (1) If the city, in its sole discretion, deter- mines that the premises for which or to which the building is to be moved, if within the city, or the movement of the building through or within the city is unsafe or constitutes any other unsafe condition, the city, in its sole discretion may, but shall not be required to, take or cause such action to be taken to eliminate such unsafe conditions as it shall deem appropriate (2) If the premises from which the building has been removed are within the city and such premises are left in an unsafe or unsanitary condition or the provisions of this section with respect to such premises have not been complied with, the city may, but shall not be required, in its sole discretion to take or cause such action to be taken to remedy such unsafe or unsan- itary condition and to place the premises in such condition as to be in compliance with this section Subd 8 7In es specified No person shall move any building on any public street or highway within the city at any time other than those tunes specified by the director of public safety (Code 1980, § 31 08) Sec 31-4 Regulation of radio and televi- sion towers. Subd 1 Purpose. In order to accommodate the communication needs of residents and business while protecting the public health, safety, general welfare and aesthetics of the community, the city council finds that this section is necessary in order to (1) Facilitate the provision of wireless tele- communication services to the residents and businesses of the city, (2) Minimize adverse visual effects of towers and antennas through setting design stan- dards, CD31 122 • • amt • ZONING $ 31- (3) Avoid potential damage to adjacent prop- erties from tower failure through struc- tural standards, lot size requirements and setback requirements, and (4) Maximize the use of existing and ap- proved towers and buildings to accommo- date new wireless telecommunication an- tennas in order to reduce the number of towers needed to serve the community Subd 2 Definitions The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this section, shall have the meanings ascnbed to them in this subdivi- sion, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning Antenna means any structure or device used for the purpose of collecting or radiating electro- magnetic waves including, but not linuted to, directional antennas, such as panels, microwave dishes and satellite dishes, and omnidirectional antennas, such as whips Personal wireless communication services (PWCS) means licensed commercial wireless com- munication services including cellular, personal communication services (PCS), enhanced special- ized mobilized radio (ESMR), paging and similar services Public utility means persons, corporations or governments supplying gas, electnc, transporta tion, water, sewer, cable or land line or wireless telephone service to the general public Tower means any pole, spire, structure or com bination thereof, including support lines, cables, wires, braces and masts intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna, meteorolog- ical device or similar apparatus above grade Subd 3 Location preferences for antennas and towers (1) Water towers (2) Collocations on existing telecommunica- tions towers (3) Sides and roofs of buildings over two stones (4) Existing power or telephone poles (5) Government and utility sites (6) School sites (7) Golf courses or pubhc parks when compat- ible with the nature of the park or course (8) Regional transportation corridors Subd 4 Antenna and towers in residenticj districts (RA, RB RCM, RCH) Any person, fir= or corporation erecting a tower or antenna in a residential distnct must obtain a conditional use permit and meet the following requirements (1) Communication antennas, subject to the - following conditions a Satellite dishes for television receiv- ing only are subject to the accessorT structure requirements for residen- tial districts b All antennas must be designed anc situated to be visually unobtrusive screened as appropriate, not be mul- ticolored and may contain no signage including logos, except as requires by the equipment manufacturers o: city, state or federal regulations c An antenna placed on a pnmar. structure may be no taller than 15 feet above the primary structure Any accessory equipment or struc- tures must be compatible with the design and matenals of the pnman structure and not visible from a pub- hc street d Monopoles only are allowed in resi- dential distncts e Minimum land area for freestanding monopoles site in residential dis- tncts is one acre f A tower and any antenna combined may be no more than 75 feet in height, or 100 feet in height if colocated g A tower may not be located within 100 feet of any existing or planned residential structure h A tower must be setback from a street line a minimum of the height of the tower and any antenna, and CD31 123 • • • 31-4 STILLWATER CODE towers or antennas may be sited m preferred locations as listed m sub- division 3 of this section subject to design permit approval Subd 5 Stillwater West business park districts — Business park commercial, business park office, business park industrial (BP C, BP D and BP -I) Any person, firm or corporation erecting a tower or antenna in the Stillwater West business park shall require a conditional use perrrut and meet the following requirements of this subdivision (1) Exception Communication antennas at- tached to an existing structure or in pre- ferred location which are no higher than 15 feet above the primary structure and are allowed as permitted use (2) Conditions Communication towers and antennas are subject to the following con ditions a A tower and antenna may be no more than 75 feet in height, 100 feet if colocated b A tower may not be located within 300 feet of the property line of resi- dentially zoned property c A tower may be located no closer to a street property line than a distance equal to the height of the tower plus ten feet d Minimum lot size is 0 5 acre for a pnmary tower use e Towers may be located no closer than one-half mile to the closest tower or other colocation PWCS transmitting facihty f If a tower is erected on a site with an existing primary structure, the site must have a space of 1,200 square feet set aside exclusively for tower use The tower may not be located in the front or corner side yard setback area of the primary structure but to the rear of the site Subd 6 Central business district (CBD) and professional admtnistrattue (PA) district Any per- son, firm or corporation erecting an antenna in central business and professional admnustrative districts shall meet the following requirements (1) Towers are not allowed in the CBD and PA distracts (2) Antennas are allowed subject to design review The purpose of design review is to protect the histonc integrity, natural set- ting and character of downtown and its historic buildings and the national regis- ter histonc distnct (3) All support service equipment must be enclosed within an existing building or located and screened so as to be hidden from pubhc view from the street or above Subd 7 Bluffland/shoreland district No com- munication antenna or communication tower may be located in the bluffland/shoreland, shoreland or floodplain districts Subd 8 Performance standards All personal wireless communication towers erected, con- structed, or located within the city must comply with the following requirements (1) Colocatton requirements A proposal for a new personal wireless communication ser- vice tower may not be approved unless it can be documented by the applicant that the communications equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be accom- modated on an existing or approved tower or building within a one -half -Hole radius of the proposed tower due to one or more of the following reasons a The planned equipment would cause interference with other existing or planned equipment at the tower or building as documented by a quali- fied professional engineer, and the interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost b No existing or approved towers or commercialhndustnal buildings within a one -half -mile radius meet the radio frequency (RF) design cn- tena CD31 124 • • • ZONING c Existing or approved towers and com- merciallindustnal buildings within a one -half -mile radius cannot accom- modate the planned equipment at a height necessary to function reason- ably as documented by a qualified and professional radio frequency (RF) engineer d The apphcant must demonstrate that a good faith effort to colocate exist- ing towers and structures within a one -half -mile radius was made, but an agreement could not be reached (2) Tower construction requirements All tow- ers erected, constructed or located within the city, and all wiring therefor, shall comply with the following requirements a Monopoles are the preferred tower design However, the city will con- sider alternative tower types in cases where structural, radio frequency de- sign considerations or the number of tenants required by the city pre- cludes the use of a monopole No guy wires may be used b Towers and their antennas must com- ply with all applicable provisions of this Code c Towers and their antennas must be certified by a qualified and licensed professional engineer to conform to the latest structural standards of the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable reviewing agencies d Towers and their antennas must be designed to conform with accepted electrical engineering methods and practices and to comply with the provisions of the National Electrical Code e Metal towers must be constructed of or treated with corrosion -resistant material f Any proposed communication ser- vice tower of 100 feet in height must be designed, structurally, electn- cally and in all respects, to accom- CD31 125 f 31-4 modate both the applicant's anten- nas and comparable antennas at least one additional user To allow for fu- ture rearrangement of antennas upon the tower, the tower must be de- signed to accept antennas mounted at no less than 20-foot intervals g All towers must be reasonably pro- tected against unauthonzed climb- ing The bottom of the tower (mea- sured from ground level to 12 feet above ground level) must be de- signed in a manner to preclude un- authorized climbing to be enclosed by a six -foot -high chain link fence with a locked gate h All owners and their antennas and relative accessory structures must utilize building matenals, colors, tex- tures, screening and landscaping that effectively blend the tower facihties within the surrounding natural set- ting and built environment to the greatest extent possible No advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the. ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warn- ing and equipment information signage required by the manufac- turer or by federal, state or local authorities Towers and their antennas may not be illuminated by artificial means, except for camouflage purposes (de- signed as a hghted tower for a park- ing lot or a ball field) or the illumi- nation is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other authority k No part of any antenna or tower, nor any lines, cable, eqtupment, wires or braces, may at any time extend across or over any part of the nght-of-way, public street, highway or sidewalk. 1 All communication towers and their antennas must be adequately in- sured for injury and property dam- age caused by collapse of the tower 31-4 • • • STILLWATER CODE In All obsolete or unused towers and accompanying accessory facilities must be removed within 12 months of the cessation of operations at the site unless a time extension is ap- proved by the city council After the facilities are removed, the site must be restored to its onginal or an im- proved state n In addition to the submittal require- ments required elsewhere in this Code, applications for building per- mits for towers and their antennas must be accompanied by the follow- ing information 1 The provider must submit con- firmation that the proposed tower complies with regula- tions administered by that agency or that the tower is ex- empt from those regulations 2 A report from a qualified pro- fessional engineer shall be sub- mitted which does the follow- ing 1 u u1 1v v Describes the tower height and design including a cross section and eleva- tion, Demonstrates the tower's compliance with the afore- mentioned structural and electrical standards, Documents the height above grade for all poten- tial mounting positions, or colocated antennas and the minimum separation dis- tances between antennas, Descnbes the tower's ca- pacity including the num- ber and type of antennas that it can accommodate, and Confirmation by the pro- vider that the proposed fa- clhty will not interfere with public safety communica- tions 3 A letter of intent committing the tower owner or his succes- sors to allow the shared use of the tower as long as there is no negative structural impact upon the tower and there is snodis- ruption to the service provided Subd 9 Extsttng anten�uc irtowers wri enstce Anten- nas, towers and accessory as of July 1, 1997, which do not conform or to comply with this section are subject to the follow- ing provisions (1) Towers may continue in use for the pur- pose now used and as now existing, but may not be placed or structurally altered without complying in all respects withun this section (2) If a tower is damaged or destroyed due to any reason or course whatsoever, the tower may be repaired or restored to its former use, location and physical dimension upon obtaining a building permit, but without otherwise complying with this section Subd 10 Obsolete or unused towers All obso- lete or unused towers and accompanying acces- sory facilities must be removed within 12 months of the cessation of operations, unless a time extension is approved by the city council If a tune extension is not approved, the tower may be deemed a nuisance pursuant to Minn Stat ch 429 If a tower is determined to be a nuisance, the city may act to abate the nuisance eq� t s e removal of the tower at the property sharing expense In the case of multiple operators the use of a single tower, this provision will not become effective until all users cease operations for a period of six consecutive months After the facilities are removed, the site must be restored to its onglnal or to an improved state § 10-28-97) (Code 1980, § 3109, Ord No 848, 1, Sec 31-5 Conservation regulations Subd 1 Purpose The purpose and intent of the conservation regulations 1s to protect the pubhc health, safety and community welfare and to otherwise preserve the natural environmental resources of the city in areas having signs ficant CD31 126 1 2 3 4 3 6 7 9 9 10 A 8 C TOWER / EOUIPMENT DATA STRUCTURAL TYPE HEIGHT FOUNDATION TYPE LIGHTING CONFIGURATION GROUNDING COORDINATES TOWER MANUFACTURER CONTACT PHONE NO GENERAL CONTRACTOR ADDRESS CONTACT PHONE NO TRANSCEIVER STATION EOUIPMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO QUANTITY MOUNTING ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS GROUNDING MONOPOLE TOWER 1C0 -0 BY SPRINT PCS XXXX PER SPECIFICATION 45 03 15 98 LAT xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCS POWER & TELEPHONE CABINET NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES IN, MODEL NO QUANTITY MOUNTING ELECTRICAL REOUIREMENTS GROUNDING RADIO FREQUENCY FRONT END (RFFE) UNIT EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NO ouANT TY MOUNTING ELECTRICAL PEOUIREMENTS GROUNDING XXXX xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx SITE NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE COUNTY 92' 49 42 62 LONG PIN NUMBER CELL NUMBER SITE INDEX SIZE OF PROPERTY PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS PHONE NO ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTACT PHONE NO TELEPHONE COMPANY CON TAC T PHONE N0 PROJECT ENGINEER STREET CITY ST ZIP CONTACT PHONE N3 SSLP IMPLEMENTATION MANAGER SSLP PROPERTY SPECIALIST STREET CITY ST ZIP PHONE NO PROJECT NUMBER HOLADAY TOWER 114 BRICK STREET STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 WASHINGTON XXXX MS21XC935A 3 5 ACRES BOB SMITH 3 GOLF VIEW DRIVE PORT ORANGE FL 321 (904) 760-0417 NSP xxxx xxxx US WEST xxxx xxxx AEC ENGINEERING 400 FIRST AvENUE N SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 JERRY SLOBODNIK (612)-332-8905 FAX (612)- 34-3101 BRIAN WEGNER JOHANNA DE MARA 9801 WEST HIGGINS ROAD SUITE 220 ROSEMONT 0. 60018 MS21XC935A3200 VICINITY MAP CSAH SITE" 12 h 4A co Ramsey St W o/I ve St w NORTH Stillwater MN 0 3/20/00 RELEASED FOR ZONING 4 PERMITTING 1 PERT CCRTiFY TUT TIR5 DOCUYEN WAS PREPARED en ME OR UNDER MY MEET SUPER VISION AND THAT I • • DAAY REC5TEP0O PRO TESSION4 CNOINCER UNDER IPC U45 OF THE STATE 0 MI NESOT SK:NED MINNEAPOLIS MTA RADIO EOUIPMENT BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (BTS) APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS 126 W x 30 D x 72 H APPROXIMATE WEIGHT (WITH BATTERIES) 4700 LBS ANTENNAS (TX RX) SECTOR 1— 30 AZIMUTH (2 DOWN —TILT) SCALA AP17 1900 63D/DT2 SECTOR 2— 150 AZIMUTH (2 DOWN —TILT) SCALA AP17 1900 63D/DT2 SECTOR 3— 270 AZIMUTH (0 DOWN —TILT) SCALA AP17 1900 63D/DT2 INSTALL ALL ANTENNAS WITH MECHANICAL DOWN —TILT AS NOTED FOR ANTENNA DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHT SEE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS COAX CABLES ANTENNA TO BTS DIAMETER— 1 1/4 0 (NOMINAL VERIFY W/ APPROXIMATE LENGTHS SECTOR 1 125 FT SECTOR 2 125 FT SECTOR 3 125 FT A c �r+o No 200501-2784 i)4 UAIG KJS 'UA-C 3/22/00 VAWRye0A *meta IlYnt%Mo , Adam Ra. ma WeRIR SPRINT} SHEET T1 Al A2 A3 SPRINT SPECTRUM COVER SHEET DRAWNO INDEX TITLE COVER SHEET SITE PLAN LEASE COMPOUND PLAN LEASE COMPOUND ELEVATIONS HOLADAY MINNEAPOLIS MTA SITE 935 CAD FILE NAME XDWG\SPRINT\ 200501\2784\935T 1 SITE I D NO MS21XC935A 40 DATE REVISVNS AND RECORD OF ISSUE NO DATE REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE OAT' REG NO CATE AEC ENGINEERING O4 WING NO MSC935T1 T ACV I C 1 2 3 4 0 8 7 e 10 A B C 0 E r I 'Nerererw -s.au BLOCK 16 1 s,,,, ,,,,R I MCKINSTRY & SEELEYS ADDITION TO THE CITY 0 eusw/bnive !! ca0marS lPEr 40 0890uOuS TREE fear WRARD w 51199/1r0c0 Post 9GV 0Am7C/ODIm ▪ SON mlmc/0/A7R ® Art ear • NAAfp'sPPEM SIALL e P0C RSr e Y7wraa1C sell B emir ry tar 51 CAS LSir1 9 snowy roses Lassos I 1 B aircrew room Q s*Nrusr UAA.RxE ® SEWN atANa/I ▪ &Weld URN e459s • aAtsft Buss. a1 MAXIM 010 S RCN CONFCIE 5LeR,ACE O mew wAN10i£ m ra O.40.4 Dar O mn0aa 1AAwaE ® MAIM COMM( BOX l3 HMO HOLC mum weir Al SE1/4 S.C. 29 SITE PLAN SCAIL I = 30 0 LEGEND Smarr rim Go tuff 4 FOAM MAE ® atonic era M sitcom ✓ Ecom BE w 811mIG a War D0 tit O7 0 0 ant LUNG a OUrim N — ^— GAS ref GAS U E POW" 027.8A0 Pele UNDERara/N0 SA1IAP0 SEDER VERY worm rarr.oYE 0KInEAO - - -- wA7ERYAN ILNLE 101E OfOOL XIS mEE UM BLOCK 15 N5m1W EIM COR1D5OUS IerS Lad 0rtwera1r5 SUP(ACe NE arena ,� IS PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION (per Tax Legal) Port of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Sect on 29 Tomah 30 Range 20 Begnning of a pont on the South Me of sod North Half o/ the Southeast Quarter dstance I08151 feet rest of the Southeast carer o/ sad tract said point bang the Northeast comer of Sod( 15 of MCKINSTRY d SEELEY'S ADDITION TO THE CITY" thence rest an the South Imo of said tract a distance o/ 51043 &set to is point thence north and parallel w th the West line of Brek Street a distance o1 309 5 Met thence east and parallel with the South Imo of said tract a cisterns o/ 510 4...1 feet to the West me of Bnck Street thence south along the West Ina of Brck Street o dstance of 5095 feel to the pont Of beginning LEASED PREMISES LEGAL DESCRIP770N Ali Mat part of the following Part o1 the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29 Tomshlp JO Range 20 Begmnng at o powt on the South Ine of sod North Hdf of the Southeast 07rorfr distance 108151 feet west o/ the Southeast comer of said tract sod pent being the Northeast comer of Block 15 of MCKINS1RY k SEELEYS ADDITION TO THE 011" thence west an the South lino of sold tract a dstance of 51043 reef to a point thence north ,Ind parallel with the West Mort. of Brick Street a ddonee of J095 feet thence east and parallel with the South line of sad froet 0 dlsfance of 51045 feet to the West Me of Brick Street thence south along the West line of Brick Street o dafanee of 3095 feet to the pont o/ beginning Deserted as follow= Commencing at the said Ncrthe0sf comer of Block I5• thence North 88 degrees 32 minutes 19 seconds West along the South lire of the Mantis Hoff of the Southeast curter of sold Sect an 29 a distance of 32773 feet thence North 01 degrees 27 minutes 41 seconds East d dstance of 165.81 feet to the pant o1 beginning of the Leased P emises Site to be described thence contmung North 01 degrees 27 remotes 41 seconds East o distance of 3000 feet- thence South 88 degrees J2 minutes 19 seconds East a dstance of 3000 feet thence South 01 degrees 27 minutes 41 seconds West, a dstance of 2000 feet to point hremolfr referred to as Point A thence continuing South 01 degrees 27 ,inn Ns 4/ swards West a defence of 10.00 feet thence North 88 degrees J2 minutes 19 seconds West a distance o/ J0.00 Met to the pont of beginning Together with o 2000 Not easement for access and ufA)(Y purposes ore= under end 0a0s1 the abo w desc bed property the cents lin of which is dnrnbed as follows Beginning of the above deserbed Point A thence South 88 degrees J2 minutes 19 seconds East o d stance o1 10934 Met thence South 48 degrees 46 mnutes 44 seconds East o distance of IJJ87 Met thence South r7 degrees 16 minutes 59 'mauls East o distance of 406J feet Merles North 89 degrees 27 minutes 17 seconds East a dlstonce of 6986 feet to the Pest Rght of Way Ine of 8 irk St eet and sad centerline the a terminating. DETAIL SCALE t = 20 -0 NO DATE RCVISIONS AND RECOnn OF ISSUE 0 3/22/00 RELEASED FOR ZONING & PERUI7TING NO DATE RE -VISIONS ANO RECORD OF ISSUE I HEREBY CERTIFY TrIAT THIS DOCUUENT DAS PREPARED Bo YE 0R UN00, IP MCI SUPER VISOR ANb nor 1 AM DULY PEG STEREO PRO FISSION.. ENC NEER Invm Tlq LADS or n'E suit Or YYHESCTA 0GREO DAIR etc NO "EL Nu "° 200501 —2784 kJ5 DATA — 3/22/00 CK 0ATr DArr- -- Illweeem1 I Alders , Derma VisIWA1nNI AEC ENGINEERING 3883219 E 30 00 SPRINT SPECTRUM SITE PLAN HOLADAY MINNEAPOLIS MTA SITE 935 CAD 11LE VAR E \DWG\SPRINT\200501\2784\935A1 S TE D NO MS21XC935A DR r'NG NO MSC935AI p • / 100 MONOPOLE (ET OTHERS) (ANTENNAS NOT 5 OWN FOR CLARITY SEE 2/42 OR ANTENNA PLAN) CABLE BRIDGE BY SPRINT PCS EOUIPMENT PLATFORM O ENLARGED SITE PLAN Az SCALE I/O - 1 —0 (SEE S1 FOR PLATFORM DIMEI61ORS) 6 —0 FENCE W/BARB WIRE 144kL NORTH 30 —0 NO DATE REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE 0 NO 3/22/00 DATE RELEASED FOR ZONING & PERMITTING REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE 1 MEREST CERT!r, THAT MS DOCUMENT WAS PPEPAREO Br rE OR JNDEA MT INFECT SUPER 1151ON ANC THAT 1 AM A 00AT RTI)STEREO PRO— STATTEOOOf PANRAL N0SSOOT u DER THE LAIRS OF TNC SIGNED DATE REC 40 EDGE OF 30 —0 30 —0 LEASE AREA o c �Nw "u200501-2784 OR NJS 3/22/00 PHASE 1 BUILD —OUT ANTENNAS TVP O (3) SECTORS PHASE 2 FUTURE ANTENNAS TSR O (3) SECTORS ANTENNA PLAN Az SCALE 1/2 = L —0 4 NORTH 10 T—ARM ANTENNA MOUNT TTP (3) Sptint ADP A ® M24PLOPti /426PRIIIIVIPPfa Rd.no+d WP AEC ENGINEERING SPRINT SPECTRUM LEASE COMPOUND PLAN HOLADAY MINNEAPOLIS MTA SITE 935 GAO 4LE AA, \ DWG \SPRINT\200501\2784\935A2 TF D NO MS21XC935A CP N NG NO MSC935A2 REV 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 e e 10 ti A 8 B C 0 T ARN ANTENNA MOUNT (TYP) ELEVATION Or SPRINT PCS ANTENNAS J PHASE 1 BUILD-0AJT ANTENNA (TP ) q ELEVATION OF PROPOSED SECOND CARRIER PROPOSED MUM: ARON BY OTHERS 6 -0 CHNN LINK — FENCE W/BARB WIRE n n n n n w_ w. � .N u N OA3 n n UICROFLECT TRH -BRACKET ASSEMBLY yrl n n n i r Ar d u u PROPOSED 100 0 MONOPOLE BY OTHERS PCS ICE BR BY SPRINT ( 4, EQUIPMENT PLATFORM (SEE DWG SI) J BIS I I IDLE Il TOWER ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH r ( CONCRETE MR) 3 DEEP COMPACTED AGGREGATE SURFACING OVER GROUND STABNZATION FABRIC NOTES 1 LOCAT10NS OF EOUTPUCNT SHOWN ON DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE VARIED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENG NEER 2 ROUTE ELECTRIC TELEPHONE AND EOUIPMENT CABLE/CONDUIT ALONG UTILITY EASEMENT SEE PLAN 1/At AND OWG Al FOR TELCO & ELECTRICAL SERVCES POINT OF DEMARCATION BURT UNDERGROUND CONDUITS A MNIANM OF 1 -6 BELOW GRADE, PROVIDE PULL ROPE IN EACH CONDUIT PROVIDE WORKING CLEARANCE AROUND ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AS REONRED BY THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 3 ALL E ANTENF4A PANEL NA AS A ELEVATIONSBE ORIENTED AT 30' 1 a 1RTH RESPECT TO TRUE NORTH (0 ) ALL ANTENNAS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MECHANICAL DOWN -TILT AS NOTED SEE COVER SHEET T1 FOR ANTENNA AND DOWN -TILT SPECIFICATION 4 FIELD ADJUST THE ORIENTATION OF THE ANTENNA MOUNTING FRAME PER TOWER MµUFACTURER S INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCOMOQATE THE INSTALLATION OF THE ANTENNAS AT THEIR MIN AZIMUTH 5 THE ANTENNA MOWING FRAME SHALL BE SUCH THAT TNT DISTANCE BETWEEN ANTENNAS OF ADJACENT SECTORS 5 4 -0 I NIMUM 6 THE PHASE 1 BUILD -OUT ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR $TWILL BE INSTALLED AT 12 -0 SPACING THE AI4ENL1 MOUNTING FRAME SHALL BE SUCH THAT A TOTAL OF FOUR ANTENNAS AT 4 0 SPACING CAN BE INSTALLED AT EACH SECTOR 7 APPROXIMATE COAX CABLE LENGTH FROM BR TO ANTENNAS 5 125 -0 FOR ALL SECTORS 6 INSTALL UGIONING R00 SUPPLIED 1WTH TOWER 50 R EXTENDS 5 -0 (*) ABOVE TOP OF ANTENNAS 9 INSTALL 4 EQUAL LENGTH NO 2 AWG GROUND WIRES FROM THE TOWER TO THE GROUNDING GRID INSTALL A N0 2 AVG GROUND WIRE FROM EACH RFFE TO THE GROUNDING GRID VERIFY WITH SPRINT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF RFTE 5 TO BE INSTALLED 10 INSTALL A 8 -0 HIGH RESICENTNL GRADE GALVAMZED STEEL SLATTED CHAN LINK FENCE AROUND THE LEASE AREA PER PROJECT SPECIFCA110NS THE FENCE 5 TO WAVE A 12 -0 WIDE DOUBLE GATE 11 INSTALL MICROFIECT OR APPROVED EQUAL, CE BRIDGE/CABLE TRAY 9/PIPE COLUMN SUPPORTS FROM TOWER TO EQUIPMENT PLATFORM INSTALL AND SUPPORT THE ICE BRIDGE PER MANUTACNRER 5 RECOMMENDATIONS NO DATE REVISIONS AND RECORD OF ISSUE O NO 3/22/00 DATE RELEASED FOR ZONING & PERMITTING REVISIONS AND RECORD OF *SUE 1 HEREBY CE4IF1 THAT TARS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY DIRECT SUPER VISION AND THAI I AN A Duly REGISTERED PRO- FESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER DE CMS Or ENE STATE Or AIMNESOTA SIGNED DATE REG NO EC PNO 200501-2784 KJS Cm UA 3/22/00 Di APP DATE • ASsmardw MINtOGIR AEC ENGINEERING SPRINT SPECTRUM LEASE COMPOUND ELEVATIONS HOLADAY MINNEAPOLIS MTA SITE 935 t CAD VLF. N INE \DWG\SPRINT\200501\2784\935A3 TE D NO MS21XC935A DR wNG V0 MSC935A3 R0CV PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM • CASE NO V/00-21 t--* • • Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location 1337 South Second Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Russell and Jacqueline Saystrom Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the sideyard setback (5 feet required, 4 feet requested and a rear yard setback (5 feet required, 4 feet requested) for the construction of garage Discussion The apphcant is proposing to construct a 980 square foot garage, to replace his existing one car garage that is in disrepair The existing garage is located 2 feet from the rear property line and 4 feet from the side yard property line A new garage could be moved in 2 feet more from the rear property line, but moving it any farther to the north on the side yard property line would create a tight maneuvering space for a car to get in and out of the north side of the garage Staff cannot reach the applicant at the wasting of this report to ask the applicant if he can move the proposed garage 2 feet more from the rear property line creating a setback of 4 feet, why it couldn't move it one more foot There would be no reason to request a Variance for the rear setback if he could locate the building 5 feet from the property line The upper floor will be used for storage There will probably be a hght fixture and a couple outlets, nothing else m term of making it habitable Conditions of Approval 1 The garage shall be similar m style, color and matenals as the main structure 2 Dramage from the roof shall remain on site 3 All plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official Recommendation Denial of Variance request for rear yard setback Approval as conditioned of Variance request for side yard setback Findings • • • 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties m the same district and m the same vicuuty, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and mtent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings • • • Case No V Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED OO — Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $500 $70/200 $500 $300 $100+$50/ $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 057 SO 21‘1' ST' Assessor' Parcel No Zoning District Descnptign"of Project Peimcv- old s,mq /l Ca (-49-e, N arac 141111 z IbI or 9g5 "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner RSS (( + Ja tJdiAt -C S4v‘Representative MailingAddress 1337 So 2"" S Siellis7cr MailingAddress , Telephone No Li30.0y25 Telephone N Signature Signature z pieces 1233 c30 ZO 1 `( Oo 9S R33 03o zo ,M oc,9y SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION °A d Pa` ce ( ,� Lot Size (dimensions) 101 x l!*1 2- Land Area Height of Buildings Principal Accessory Stories Feet IYL 20-2g f' Total building floor Area Existing COD sq ft Proposed WO sq ft Paved Impervious Area -sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided 9F6 sq ft Revised 5/22/97 1221 EAST MARSH H w STREET w 1303 1304 ' o uarlrAM ° SOUTH SECOND 1 1305 312 • NM MI ilia 09 1314 1IM1;= 1322 IMMK- ® 1329 RIN 1330 13•33 \` 1318 o a -- -c>_LK_ , Ui -1 UM 1346 1345 i SAH 23 65TH STREET REET Oa-k Park Location Map I MOUND STREET 64TH ST N EAST ORL 1214 1218 NS STREET R2OW RI9W R1W R2„W IOW Vicinity Map Scale in Feet Pea, losMad al w9.n0.m,nalm Ibn awd°ip Apil 0 mourn am City of Stillwater, 1 the next few months I would like to tear down my old garage as it is leanmg pretty badly and is too small I came down to City Hall recently and was given a plat map of the neighborhood by Shawn, so that I could locate my property lines With a metal detector I was able to locate 2 of the south side property hne stakes I measured to my existing garage and determmed the measurements mdicated on my plan view of my lot The reason I am asking for a variance is that I have very limited space to swing my car into the left hand garage stall if I shift it the full 5' from the south property hne, and the further I move it to the west, (forward) the harder it becomes to get mto the garage stall, because of a small hill with a full grown tree I'd hke to keep To my calculations, I am gomg to be 4' from the back property line, and approx 4' from the side property line Further, I had a new driveway mstalled about 4 years ago and it will still line up with the new garage if I am able to keep the south side of the new buildmg m the same place as the old one I am not asking to build the building any closer to my neighbors property, only that the south side be m the same line as it presently is, and I will move the new buildmg 2' further onto my own property from the east property line • • Thank you for your consideration, Russ Saystrom 1337 So 2nd Street Stillwater, MN 55082 • N I • (07' Dashed Ines I'(I rale exisdi'i, gGroDt- (to be fe At IJe d) Sollrl (,Y\es 111dreale jC pro() e I /JCL) So.( 7 L1ti6 544 ,ireksH'II\ ion' I i Added AsO\OI4 40 mee4 _'\\ lei, c�, f;lit )'rk rfC vs I337 So 2n(1 Sf I 3 7 ,S 2_1\4 {rc To ir Prdrf1 Dr v( )rL') �t 1 _4 / I 00 t� Lot, 1 ill- ] Sou -H,1, 2. id ' 1- #i T NORTH f Garage Shoe 9gg ``6� J 1 S-bt L JC. Garacs e 9' -- 4 ,1' 9' - -7t 7L • • • 9- a I r 1 I I_ I I I -L t I I I I0,i iI 1 I l 1 1 �/ Ito_ -,I �- --I- I_._ -I r verIe Poeas - Id • 9' r 3% x a $� WOO obvLv to WEST &Lev 26' ,-e 9' • • Z1trt _I i 1 i 1 I I I I I I I--%� ! I LIL LLiL I-L -I' i' I _ _t I ___I i i L l 11 1 II1' 'lt I I, ' II I I � /T 7 I w1 rl SouTN CIEV • • • K Y / % d___T L__ l_ __1 1 .ez1'�I�_ �_ L 1 I_ -1-►--1-� - ___I - _T_-= --I--1 r 1 1-1 I 1 1 l 1- _I - 1- _ -1 -1-- -1 - _E __1 r � � L `T" _1 1 Z 1_-__, 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 }- 1 1. 1 L T I i I 1 1— I 1__ L L I 1_ _ 1 ! i I__ ___C_�L-= L-1 1-=1 - : f I" _1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1( 1 T 1 -1 _ 1_ -�` 1_� �- -1 1 1 �-�- - r T 1 =1= 1 _ l- f 1 , 1- I I 1- ] -1 :T- r 1 1 1 _i_ L 1 i= 1 1 1_ 1 1 �.i!. 1 ^ _--1 I - , _ 1 -] T 1 1- 1- _ I 1 f 1- - T--- -I-- —_i_ �_ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 _ 1`_1____--r 1 7 i r] 1 �--I- I_ 1 1 -1- 1 _I_ L I 1 L I l I 1 a 3L/ I jgs-f EIeva iov\ ,fi • • 7 NN� I I I _— J- I __r___1-r- I r I I_ ► I - f- 1 I �-- ---I /--L r I I f_ I_I I i I - -I f-� 1 r-r- __ _ 1 I_ :I I I r -1 T _1 i _ 1_ 1 I ,4 -i 11 �_—► r .1 I 1 II r \� I r-1-�__,_ ` 1 I . 1 I I N.I I I' I--7- _ L ---- J-- T L I I I + I' ( — I— 1 T T1 t L NoKr!I ELEV, FriMcd SgakPs Amid houSG a�iP 5..t;., . }r� �.t� f � .r rya_. • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-22 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location, 202 North Martha Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zonmg District RB Applicants Name Kyle Weed Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 24 feet requested) for the construction of a gazebo G'i Discussion The request is for a Vanance to construct a gazebo attached to the house m order to create the effect of a tower on the house It would be a 10 feet diameter octagon and would be 22 feet high The top of the tower would stop at the second floor eaves The apphcant felt that if it were located farther to west on the site, it would not have the tower look to the house The gazebo would be open with eight upright wooden poles supportmg the roof Roof shingles would be brown to match the house The poles would be pamted to match the house Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the Variance, staff suggests the followmg conditions of approval 1 Architectural style and matenals be the same as the mam structure 2 All plans shall be approved by the City Engmeer and the Buildmg Official Recommendation Demal Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbormg violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and m the same vicinity, and that • • a a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the pubhc interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Elevation Drawing 17 CO ti 70? ti 0 ti MULBERRY 5 9 234 208 202 126 RICE TREET 11 51 • 8 104 110 Location Map cc W w 411 407 614 ; -t. 506 0 1 229 O • COCO 232 228 224 —218 N 210 WEST 6 th LQ CO 0 C0a oz oN _618_ •114 • O 617 2 1- 0 Z STREET Cr) Lai 225- 219 215 1209 207 208 201 202 0 1- W RICE STREET Q 125 •126 1.21 122 516 104 WEST 517 Po 1 115 112 H 0 Z JTH HARRIET STREET N 42 MR 0 R_IW R2OW RI9W R22W R_IW R2OW Uaruty Map 0 163 Scale in Feet 1100.60 tire. a mrp�Nm mrtc000r abrtl rmmaM r�p�rr b Am Wrnpmncu.go•m. llsfWrV YOMM udb rdnno .-.b �etla bry Bwa4WMpenfa�t/ yM1d d!u I�v.Imgao®s a.r.a m • • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* )O Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $300 $1 00+$50/lot $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater Address of Project Zoning District PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Q I� V\ata.L. Assessor's Parcel No 203Da03/0/3 Description of Project "I hereby state the all respects, to the with the permit if it Property Owner Mailing Address City - State - Zip Telephone No (o Signature foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply s granted and used " W R Representative I•�o Mailing Address \lv.l t,„-W^ M City - State - Zip Lot Size (dimensions) Land Area Height of Buildings Stones 11 Feet Pnncipal Accessory H-10 -7-10Q0 Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION x_ Total building floor Area 100 sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area _ sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided _ Revised September 16, 1998 • • • Kyle Weed 202 North Martha Street • Stillwater, MN 55082-4855 (651) 430-2600 • Fax (651) 430-1726 April 18, 2000 Community Development Department City of Stillwater We would like to build a gazebo to give the effect of a tower on our house To create this effect we would construct a 10' diameter octagon gazebo with a steep pitch roof This would be the formal entry to our porch and into our house We feel the gazebo will add a lot of visual interest to the house and neighborhood The gazebo would be in line with the current porch This places it 24' from the curb, which is the same distance as the existing porch Placing it any further back than this eliminates the tower effect and instead just looks like an added gazebo Please feel free to call me at the number above if you have any questions • • • r • 1- • • .‘‘ • tv • w: ww*TwLE �� i�A` �+r2�=«'S �:-:.1 0'tGlet, w•• • 2 0 Z1�TE-kCa- 4- \\t ____.4 • T • iat f� 4 i 1 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-23 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location 402 North Second Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Martin and Judith Hansen Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 3 feet requested) and a Vanance to the impervious surface coverage (30% maximum, 44% requested) for the construction of a two-story addition Discussion The applicant is requestmg two Variances The first request is for a Vanance to the rear yard setback The applicant is proposing to construct a two-story addition connecting the main house and a proposed new garage The lot is a non -conforming lot, it is approximately 4350 square feet and the ordinance for the Two Family Zomng Distnct requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet So the ongmal house is approximately 11 feet from the rear yard setback, which by code should be 25 feet The impervious surface coverage with the request is at 44 % coverage and the required is 30% Since there is no viable way to retain the drainage on the site, it is staff's suggestion if the Commission approves the project, that the apphcant pay a fee of $1000 to the Stormwater Utihty Fund Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the requests, staff suggests the following conditions of approval 1 All plans be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official 2 A fee of $1,000 shall be paid to the Stormwater Utility Fund prior to obtammg a building permit Recommendation Denial Fmdings • • • 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifymg a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties m the same district and m the same vicm ty, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizmg of the variance will not be of substantial detrunent to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and mtent of this title or the public mterest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan i • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid 7 Receipt No 7.26-- , z PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance $70 Conditional or Special Use Permit $50/20C Design Review $25 Planned Unit Development* $500 Variance (170120C Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Subdivision* $100+S Resubdivision $100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attachec The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 4o Z. A/ zAla Sr Zoning District Ra tF.4 ,14y Description of Project 2. ,fr„z.,, 4.®5•,7-1o.., 77, Di.✓-'$p 5 "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Mir„u Jwp/rw i, ,; ft v Representative S,c.,,E ,¢, Ow.v Mailing Address 40 z- Al. z.p Sr. Mailing Address Telephone No (6 'i) 4 3 9 -3Gs y- Telephone No Signature 1,1I., I.I f" a _ Signature Assessor's Parcel No 1Q n o;o. Z6. 13. DOS SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) So' x _ 77 Land Area gsso Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal z 26'± Accessory Total building floor Area Z7oo sq ft Existing /73/ sq ft Proposed 9657 sq ft Paved Impervious Area 7'7? sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided z Revised 5/22/97 Proposed two story adaition to the single family home at 402 IV 2no St • by Martin & Judith Hansen This home has been in the Hansen family since it was purchased by Christian John Hansen in 1914 Four generations have lived here The house was built on a small corner lot (50'x87') in the original city on block 11, lot 12 There are no houses across 2nd Street from this property The rear lot line is a sandstone cliff approximately 15 ft high The area for the proposed addition currently consists of a concrete patio slab & a concrete slab for a dog kennel with a chain link fence enclosure Rain water run off remains unchanged with run off going to 2nd Street & Linaen Street sewers As present owners we have made a series of improvements since 1958 A two car garage replacement was done in the fall of 1970 with a varience granted by the city council (case 29) Because we would like to continue to live in this house as long as possible, we would like to make the proposea addition between the house • & garage 1 Remodel the present kitchen & create an informal dining area adjacent to it 2 Move the laundry area to the first floor (now in the basement) 3 Have a family room on the second floor which will allow having a bedroom on the first floor at some time in the future 4 Allow access to the patio on the garage roof from the famil} room & eliminate the present outside stairway 5 Add space for an office/computer room • ..... O.". I i 4 1- I *."-- f % 1 1 1 ...ebi;r 0 , 4 _ _1 11---i - q- .7...f0-..'— __ jr e ei _ 411":4-75'1.b.; 14. licoco-Rim•P'—e.-cm-..mtmtwii,s.r".4.tut.-,oase.,-,zr•vA.tar,--p-Feralta.72.1vz",m-1,1-eulowaxemoziaA4Yeavliviqt.Pz-vrpziri,z4n-seTif,Nr-e+A..mootirsmixtekisp1/44 • • WE HAVE REVIEWED THE PROPOSED TWO STORY ADDITION TO THE HOME OF MARTIN $ JUDITH HANSEN AT 002 N 2ND STREET & HAVE NO OBJECTION NAME `61,,AQ„„9 • Alm' )-)7( • ADDRESS 40(nf 92teD If ISLAo DATE yrzzi.07,i jicf J-/(2_÷) g/24c-o Ad cS Wo 6 2 - 0 • • /YE/s/Bvz Yagv A-Bokr ;$ o E1ia-ale.e 87-0 /4.1/ E L'tipEA) Sr Sb A/W 0 n 1 0 0 Noar i )1/ 1o7 riO .18 °S 27t 6 O J1-61 'l. a ort /t 14 w e A t N r=61 ? /3 # htie i — -SAaPs forvE ,e J r2 =10 1.4 v LA/ /4LK 9-9 v / Sro2Y c z.- /3 0 i A zo -r S o I / DPO /Nr LR t' � E J f t Maw 570..sE W. li a oizasi.J4 L S/t[.o 0899) op T P.E.o poSEo 2 STo._y Ape AI Exrsr 23 -7 ENE C R rVGE z4 -6 t .Bove /sr F-ceo,2 ,eE51P ,,cE 2 s7-02y (wove Ae.9A4L) Ec€[!}Al E Fes¢.v j4C( OxMAa!r tAg rvhe ❑ gas 30-4 06 -6t Ab k �-4 IsrJ, MkrEeAdeizA I O S 6f4Qi4G•C J a GA-JZRGE / Sro 20-o �'. c AG o.I 77, P 0PI6-.4esrgE 0 Y 03 r-8 Ala LO wssex 9 .4ct 7 P ��.vE 4.1 d r 0 s 0 STO4,G WA L V Go.vc24 re W.ac_� ry AN 84uc0c Ca4p� 1 U v t tft W PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/V/00-24 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location 1221 North Broadway Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name George Middleton Type of Application Subdivision and Variance Project Description Request to subdivide a 83,636 square foot lot into three lots of 29,580, 36,764 and 17,292 square feet Discussion The request is to subdivide a 83,636 square foot lot into three lots of 29,580, 36,764 and 17,292 square feet The proposal requires a vanance to the conservation ordinance because a slope greater then 24 percent runs through the middle of the middle lot A moratonum on development and subdivision is also in place for this North Hill area because of lack of City sewer service (moratonum attached) This Public Works Department has recently received Council direction to prepare a feasibility study for providing City sewer and water to the North Hill Area Further, staff does not support the vanance to the conservation regulations This would eliminate one lot Recommendation Denial Attachments Application and plans • • • ORDINANCE NO 8 8 2 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE EXTENDING A MORATORIUM FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF STILLWATER BY RESTRICTING AND PROHIBITING BUILDING DEVELOPMENT OR SUBDIVISIONS ON PARTS OF THE NORTH HILL 1 Findings a For the purposes of this Ordinance, the North Hill is descnbed as follows Beginning at the intersection of the north line of St Croix Avenue and County Road 5, thence northwesterly along County Road 5 to the south line of the Minnesota Zephyr Railroad Tracks, thence east along the south line of the Minnesota Zephyr Railroad Tracks to the north/south centerline of Section 21, Township 30N, Range 20W, thence north on the centerline to the north line of Section 21, thence east on the north line to the shore of the St Croix River, thence southeasterly along the shore of the St Croix River to the north line of Laurel Street as extended, thence west along the north line of Laurel Street to the west line of Highway 96, thence north along the west line to a point 150 feet south of the south line of East Poplar Street, thence west along a line parallel and 150 feet south of the south line of East Poplar Street extended to the west line of North Second Street, thence south along the west line of North Second Street to the east line of Sycamore Street extended, to its intersection with the west line of North Fourth Street, thence north along the west line of Fourth Street to Moore Street, thence east along the north line of Moore Street to the west line of William Street, thence south along the west line to the north line of St Croix Avenue, thence west along the north line of St Croix Avenue to the point of beginning b The North Hill, as defined in this Ordinance, has no sanitary sewer or water facilities and a storm sewer system that is either nonexistent or wholly inadequate c That much of the North Hill was developed more than one hundred (100) years ago, leaving only marginal property that is difficult to develop and a threat to the health, safety and welfare since it must be developed without municipal sanitary sewer or water facilities d That further in -fill development on the North Hill could have a serious impact on the North Hill itself and the surrounding area and remainder of the City e That within the past calendar year, the City has experienced a significant expense involving correcting ravine washouts on Hazel Street, erosion at the end of North Third Street, rutting and washouts on Hazel Street and Schulenberg Park, failed septic systems, contaminated wells, numerous washouts, pothole repairs and minor flooding problems f Until the City completes a feasibility study or a master plan for development of the North Hill, in -fill development will create more problems and make existing problems more difficult to correct, and budget constraints have not allowed the completion of the needed study during the year 1999 2 Moratorium Based upon these findings, it is hereby determined that any in -fill development, building permits, or subdivisions within the North Hill be and the same hereby are prohibited for an additional period of eighteen (18) months from October 1, 1999 3 Savings In all other ways the City Code with remain in full force and effect 4 Effective Date This Ordinance will be m full force and effect on October 1, 1998, and after its passage and publication according to law Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 5:4` day of (V ,) 1999 CITY OF STILLWATER Jav .. '. ATTEST IX- .., e, ayor Moils Weldon, Clerk Published Stillwater Gazette October 11, 1999 • • 2 } BROWNSON, BONNER, MUHLENPOH< z a dSSOCIdtes� r As- • • Transm ittal To City of Stillwater Planning Commission From Jim Brownson Date 04/21/00 Re Proposed Subdivision 1221 North Broadway The attached information is the preliminary work in an effort to subdivide the property at 1221 North Broadway The parcel is currently combined under one property I D (R21 030 20 44 0003) However it includes 5 onginal plat lots ( 75 X 150 ) and parts of 5 other onginal plat lots The highlights of the property include 83 636 square feet of area 357 feet of frontage on North Broadway The development plan includes Subdividing the existing parcel into 3 separate Tots Bnnging city specified sewer and water with approved hydrants and manholes from connection points in First Street down Stillwater Avenue and along Broadway to the property Creating a new dnveway to the existing house at 1221 North Broadway Building homes on the two newly created lots Thank you for your consideration I look forward to presenting this project at the May 8 meeting ti • Page 1 11343 39th St N Lake Elmo MN SSo4z Office 6si 773 300o Fax 6 i 773 3030 • • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE ning Amendment* Subdivision* $100+$50/Ic Resubdivision $100 Total Fee ``f 270 9O Certificate of Compliance $70 Conditional or Special Use Permit $50/200 Design Review $25 anned Unit Development* $500 Variance $70/200 Corliprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 $300 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application I PROPERTYIIIDENTIFICATION E1�.Z ���G► 2.1,Ja sc esso s Parcel No - Description of P o e�5 d.► i� Ir'r" P_ ! I l P,?c S 1 �lq, Dos Address of Project I .030 2o.44.NmZoning District p Jrin G t sav�t- seer 2., v z -6 Y to "1 fMreby state th foregoing statements and all data, ►nfdrmation and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Mailing Address Telephone No Signature 4qD 1 or+l. S Lo51- 43-2571 NWV Representative &vl Mailing Address 1154?) lq 3ci t .55042 Telephone J j (4' - 179 5' Signat SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) 375' x2l " (& ) Land Area 63 <03� sq. Height ER - Height of Buildings Stories Feet / Principal 1 2 (e.00 Accessory Total building floor Area 6 o0 sq ft Existing ,2G900 sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area (00O 0 sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 Existing Property Line Proposed Subdivision Buildable Area 100' P 140' North Broadway Limestone Retaining Wal To match Existing 117' 1 rNOMIII of m. Mann mum ..e.wl et be reprasoe L Olmatle4 or wed m any J.bod the w4.aeasq due .maraca. lYOatlaa Scale- I' = 30 10 20 Site - 3 Limestone L n\\\\\\ Slope Greate xisting Prop roposed Sub 100' d e an 24% rty Line -vision 140' North Broadway 117' 6 bwbgb andW. &d4hall a Os et Um Hone SACv -. shall x a . O.M1 d.a..x.ny dura Me Irina. awmia .I bs sn.a.s nmrma Scale.' = 30 10 20 Site-2 Existing Sanitary Sewer Existing Water Main 1 2 0 2' Z. r■ N rt LI 14, CD ID pp st. Croix Avenue New Hydrant New Sanitary Manhole Bloc 16 New 8 Sanitary Sewer Connected to manhole in First Street New 6" Water Service Connected to main in First Street New Hydrant New Sanitary Manhole East Stillwater Avenue Connect New Sanitary to Existing Manhole Connect New Water Line to Main • All new sanitary and water service Supplied, installed, and paid for by Developer • Total Lot Area 83,636 Square Feet 68' Ms *nip b. am! Man ae„ ;„a m m. Hen.mmm and AM Ya macaw..p .. .L.....e.ary - a. the..b.a.coma: ..tic Revisions Date Description i. a.. Plat Utilities Scale-1 = 50 50 10 20 Site-'6 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-26 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location 126 North Martha Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Brian and Serese Honebrmk Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front (30 feet required, 8 feet requested) and side yard (30 feet required, 20 requested) setbacks for the construction of a wrap around porch Discussion The request is for a Variance for the construction of an 8-foot wide wrap around porch At some point in the history of the house there was an 8 foot by 10 foot porch on the east side, it has since been demohshed The house is located on a comer Corner lots have 30 foot setbacks on both street sides The applicant is proposing an 8 foot wide porch that would extend from the entire 20 feet of the east face of the house and wrap around the 8 foot by 9 foot inset The east face of the house is 20 feet from the property hne, which means it's within 10 feet of the required setback, by adding an 8 foot addition it becomes 18 feet into the required 30 foot setback 30 feet minus 18 feet is a 12 foot setback The north section is in the mset and does not extend pass the front of the house, which is 10 feet from the property line, when it should be 30 feet from the property line The porch will follow the character of the house It will be open with railings extending between posts The posts will be duplicates of the posts that are at the southwest comer of the house The colors will match the color of the house Conditions of Approval 1 The porch will be similar in style, color and materials as the house 2 Plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official Recommendation Approval Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties m the same district and m the same vicuuty, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and mtent of this title or the pubhc mterest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings • • • • /i,L IC P.i RCPT # / CHECK # [o 0 gy Case No ✓ f o Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* \ Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $500 70 00 $500 $300 $100-1-$50 $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION • Address of Project k N/c&Tf{ 1 b(t, . �-sr. Assessor's Parcel No 7263/e/2,, Zoning District hip, Description of Project LEA- 9 -NC) RA c; (r "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewitn in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " • Property Owner-t— Mailing Address Telephone No t G t Signature 1-L6 (v, ktik r 45r epresentative Mailing Address Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Feet Principal Accessory Total building floor Area (2-G Existing car sq ft Proposed �16 sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided _ sq ft Revised 5/22/97 318 31'4 8-10- 804 72-4 710 702— &26 622 61 610 0 ry 0 60 • 516 N SOUTH HARRIET STREET CO CODID 0 • m w cNfl 0 m m NORTH N 0) 4N• 0 0 EVERETT o O 6.19 _615- F. NORTH -611— m 133a1S H1aON •. 01 ST ET N W cn 620 • 618 • 612 6ARTHA 01 0 •_0 0 •: TH n m m HARRI < N 0 O W CO .. COW STREET NNNN� 2 (If co /57 L 5; 3 N 2 N N N N. N a' 507 563 STREET c r CO m 0) m 728 317 722 718 712 .1 o co 704 703 NORTH VI 411 01 CS) 504 0 NORTH HARRIET SIRE 424 0 0 gl • • • • • Letter to Planning Commission — Request for Variance Addi CNN 126 North Martha Stt eet Project Wrap -around Porch This reque't for variance is for the expansion of a previou,ly existing enclosed S x 10 porch (extended 8 feet from the east face or front of the house by 10 feet from the south edge of the east face) The proposed l,iap-around would extend the entire 20' of the east face and vtirap around to the 8 x 9' inset at the wwtheast cornea of the house see elevations and map — Note the elevations show a tow er in the 8' x 9' inset This tower is to be added in the future at the same time that an addition on the west end of the house is completed 1 The S foot porch depth follows along the sight line of front porches on adjacent houses The valiance 1s requested since botl, the east and north edges of tills proposed wrap -around porch he within the 30 foot minimum required distance to the property line The east face of the house is 20 feet from the assumed pioperty line (30 feet from the center of Martha street which also is close to the west of inside edge of the front sidewalk The east edge of the proposed porch would therefore be 12 feet from the property line The north edge of the porch will not extend past the north face of the house which is 10 feet fiom the assumed property line (30 feet fiom the center of Rice street), but 17 feet from the edge of the street The porch details will follow the, character of the existing house details The porch will be open with railing extending between posts that will be duplicates of posts found on the porch at the southwest corner of the house The paint scheme, w ill follow the paint scheme of the rest of the hou,e Effort ha, been taken to paint the house with the same colors as those onginal to the house The trim will be painted Dark Brownstone with Black Old Gold Indian Red and Medium Graystone added to post and baluster details ti IU (0048) 9 (0047) 126 126 0 in 12 126 126 11 N j 43 65 0 sec10‘)\14 , 11 4365 4365 , 4365 UJ/ LL (0139) 5 ���/� 4 (0136) (%) r� 2 1 0 3 (0138) 53 , A 11 43 53 43 53 WEST 1110.01 435 14 2953 435 5 4 3 '6) (0125) 1 (0124) 434 14 2953 434 6 (0141) 5 (0069) 126 8 126 10 126 12 (0070) 126 14 26 Location Map (0137) AREA OF DISCREPANCY 0 0 LO IU (0031) 126 12 126 (0033 (0035) 14 126 (0036) 16 (oos6)_ "' WLINEOFBLK2 126 W z v 18 43 53 1- 126 w < RICE L.L Z __ < 126 M 2 N 126 7 N (0067) 0 .i 126 9 0 Z 126 11 (0068) 126 13 126 0 c) 60 ,� co c) N 126 (004 (0072) W LINE OF BLK 7 0 6 (00 4) 126 (0006) 2' R2IW ROW RI9W R22W R2IW R20w vanity Map + • 0 69 Scale in Feet This diming b.a istd anbYmn ndl.pnaObrd loaf nmm — anw, lo n.ba Mrhloyon Carty dham lb dewing .latl b Leal b afa.,— papaws aMs yyor Out/b afl iapvd0b b wry haa. is !ma[ yMSMga�Cm.ry 9.ay.M1 0lba Pawl slob aw.ninayc WM r mm • DC 1 Dd • • r • • • • • it Y J LI I 1 1 r • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/ 00-27 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location 517 North Owens Street Comprehensive Plan District General Commercial District Zoning District CA Applicants Name Edward and Kathleen Schmidt Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 0 feet requested) and side yard setback (4 feet required, 0 feet requested) and a Variance to the parkmg ordinance for the restaurant/bar and for a housing unit for the rebuilding/expansion of the Harbor Bar Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to construct a new Harbor Bar There are a number of issues the applicant is realizing that constitute the need for a new building Some of the main considerations are a sagging foundation, no disability access and potential health department concerns The apphcant believes the problems cannot be solved without a new buildmg The front yard setback would be the same as the existing structure is setting back from the property line The side yard setback is the same as the existing building, with one exception, he proposes to construct a 1320 square foot second floor apartment over part of the new construction An enclosed area on the north side in the front of the buildmg will house the dumpster, since there is no access to the back of the building The applicant is also showmg an outside deck on the north side The building design, materials and color will be very close to the adjoining buildmg to the south The facade will be stucco with a cedar shake awning The buildmg will be in line with the adjoining buildmg and the parapets will look the same A Variance to the parking ordinance is need for the restaurant/bar and for the housing unit above For the restaurant/bar the code states that one parking space is provided for each 120 square feet of floor area up to 5,000 square feet, one for each 100 square feet of restaurant area over 5,000 square feet The applicant has 1,800 square feet of floor area for the restaurant/bar, so 15 parking spaces should be provided There are no parking spaces on site A housing unit is required by code to provide two parkmg spaces per dwelling unit of which one is covered The applicant has no parking spaces Conditions of Approval 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view N I O • • • 2 A hghtmg plan showing the fixture type, height, location and extenor lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Dffector approval All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles 3 The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street 4 The trash enclosure shall be screened from view and compatible with the color and matenals of the project 5 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 6 All gutters, downspouts, flashmgs, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 7 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 8 A sign permit shall be required for all signs 9 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are issued 10 Extenor hghtmg plan to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director 11 All extenor modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community Development Director 12 A Special Use Permit will be needed to conduct outside eatmg and drmkmg Recommendation Approval as conditioned for the Vanance to the front and side yard setbacks Demal of the Variance for the housing unit, due to the intensification of use of the site and the lack of parking Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardslups justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzmg of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the pubhc interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings • • • Case No V O Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance _ _ Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $500 $70/200 $500 $300 $100+$50/ $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 577 0 0 W tr► S Assessor's Parcel No "..IF) 030 ,)0.�3 o0o b Zonin`CQ District Description of Project 'Reri-,3ve bu.A “N01 ci,nrl [2.-eBu.►I<, V \ - \\. o.N "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner P\wos-A ee}S Aviv- \c»\- Re&rese t tive Mailing Address \\` -10 ��\�Wuao� ��+\\v Ma?ng Add er ss 5 u Telephone No (Q- IkVt-Scia-9‘ Telephone No 4 /.2- PR9 — Signature aklocuqc Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions)%b x / /3 Total building floor Area 3 4{pt sq ft Land Area ,16. 0 � Existing /3,v sq ft Height of Buildings Stories Feet Proposed i9 pO s ft l�i�lb "'`?�le G Principals Paved Impervious Area sq ft Accessory Number of of street parking paces provided ON Revised 5/22/97 • M CO CO 724 716 0 CO CO CO ;11- 00 706 704 WEST 819 8115 61 co U 822 804 s co 6 1 LC) r- 0 724 R. 716 722 � ti CV ti cO ti C�J p c fl ' � 6 4 604 MAPLE CITY PARK I v 518 . ° 504 ° • 500 424 4�0 . 4 416 412 408 1016 404 w w 1- 313 cc Dcation Map T 312 310 _ co ell s STREET • r 00- W w 7 6 ti cu Q ti CO 602_ 60 WEST LAUREL • 512 515 506 513 9(14 509 . . 428 505 424 4 4.16 409- 410 403 408 60' 0 41-5412 � du' 401 404408 CLUj WEST (9 315 315 318 • 311 3,12 305 308 815 311 RTH WILLIAM 132N nIN T3O T29N T2Iw 727N R22W R2Iw R20W \lanity Map 0 Scale in Feet 110 RWpb C�m=1d ca.010m NlgafmmdW ▪ —mM w -�btan Wes1•0.1 - ▪ . kr 'Anna moralewY Co. bof �• Ig Idrgto mo, any Says,00 Rood Gm be. m A4A= Howe , 2CO3 MpPns2 bum. 169 NM0O W� • 0 _ 11 2 J ui 2 0 1 .• r h A 1- id 2§ • W. P ELEVA.ZIOK (a : i'- o i it 4 z SLEVA-C1©N. l8-.1 tL 0 Z V► t- 6 — a N 5 • • • • • ego �i1"1`�tM�a1S „a Neh �-i1�lON O O3r 4- O ZZ n/Y\_ 1alSdM(d �2101.5 OMl ,1:1 Kam} 6� oy.._ 09 do awvh / f a)rta stxa o NOZIA 'v\ tC _L____- Q r r PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/00-28 • Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location Olive Street between Second and Third Streets Comprehensive Plan District Central Business Distnct Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Don Nolde Application Special Use Permit Project Description The request is to construct a 4-umt, 3-story building with 8 parking spaces on an infill lot in the Central Business Distnct with a special use permit • r• Discussion The Central Business Distnct requires a special use permit for residential uses in that district The proposal meets setback requirements for an infill lot The height of the building is 42 feet as measured from the downhill (east) side of the building and 30 feet from the uphill (west) side of the building The garage level has space for 8 cars The proposal meets City zomng requirements Because the proposal is located in the Downtown, design review was required On May 1, 2000, the Hentage Preservation Commission approved the design of the proposal (see attached memo and conditions of approval) Conditions of Approval The Conditions on the Design Permit shall apply Recommendation Approval Attachments Application and plans 7600 Wayzata Boulevard April 21, 2000 4 Unit Housing Project Olive Street Stillwater, Minnesota Developer: Don and Marianne Nolde 311 South 3rd Street Stillwater, Minnesota (651) 439-2645 ARCHITE612512CTS, LTD. --1850 FAX: 612-512-1845 Suite 200 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Site: The site is an existing lot located on the South side of Olive Street between 2nd and 3rd Streets. The site is owned by the developer and at the present time is undeveloped. Proposed Development: The proposed project is a 4 unit, 3 story, residential structure with 8 enclosed parking spaces. The housing units consist of 3, two bedroom townhouse style units, and one 2 bedroom, single level apartment. Enclosed parking is provided in a semi -underground parking garage located below the housing units. Zoning: The site is presently zoned CBD. • • • HPC APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/DR/00-28 HPC Date May 1, 2000 Project Location Olive Street, between Second and Third Streets Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning Distnct RB Applicant's Name Donald and Marianne Nolde Type of Application Design Review Project Description Design review of 4-Unit housing structure Discussion The applicant is requesting design review of a 4 unit, three story residential structure with eight enclosed parking spaces The housing units consist of 3 two bedroom townhouse style units, and one two bedroom single level apartment The enclosed parking is provided in a semi -underground parking garage located below the housing units The total building square footage is 14,234, this includes the parking area Conditions of Approval 1 Landscape Plans, Lighting Plan and any signage for the site will be reviewed by the HPC 2 The Conditions of Approval regarding landscape plan, signage shall be met before building permits are issued 3 All utilities shall be screened from public view 4 All landscaping shall be installed before final inspection 5 The brick facade shall be dark brown or dark red to match buildings in the area 6 All exterior modifications are to be reviewed by the Community Development Director 7 All security lights shall be downlit and Tight source not seen from public view Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The project as conditioned meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines • • • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance X Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 LOLL_ $70/200 $500 300 $100+$5( $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and eng►neer►ng fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Siv.e�� Assessor's Parcel N6jf0Vicia5//0-/i1 Zoning �D1 istnct C_ 13'p Descri tion of Project 4 (il, t tk o u 1/N1—GL, e. 2�L c� O {�rit��-�� • r "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith ►1 all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner MiA IP.N7I MAK'I lid/ye /I/o keRepresentative Mailing Address .j// as c /;4874TPe Mailing Address Telephone No "/-?? 5 Telephone No Signatur ae� 6z«ei Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) (0I5.4 x 3 Land Area %4071 Height of Buildings Stones Feet Pnncipal Accessory Hoostm-a., 140.5`io Total building floor Area / ka.3 `I sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area I-1d sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided . Revised 5/22/97 • • Case No Date Filed Receipt No Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 5ive,e7f Assessor's Parcel No !;a8&3001D*d/ie Zoning District C—eta) Q Description of Project 4- UtA IA() u 5 vSi✓v �v--e--, G_1•% c_10 5-til tPOl.'t S ra-c-e.:- "I hereby state the foregoing statements and al! data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct ! further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner 'NA/p �' f o Q-IWMr 4L/4epresentative Mailing Address J%hf!_ /J� � Mailing Address City - State - Zip 09" / /U'?17Ki 55"0 Ka City - State - Zip Telephone No 6 S /, 11/ 3 i - f9G Yc Telephone No Signat deel) Signature Revised September 16,1998 4 UNIT 4OUSINC PROJECT OLIVE STREET ST 1 LLW4TR, MINNESOTA DEVELOFDEE) 5Y: pON 4 MARIANNE NOLDE 311 SOUTH 3rd STREET STILLUJ,4TER, MINNESOTA 651-439-2645 4Ck I tE CT: KMR ARCHITECTS, LTD. 1600 UJA`t'ZAtA !BLVD. SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA i63-512-1850 • isiglairoimililoolOntimpti wi J ARCHITECTS LTD 612 512 1850 FAX 612 512 1845 4 UNIT HOUSING PROJECT OLIVE STREET BETWEEN 2nd & 3rd STILLWATER MINNESOTA 600 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 200 Minneapolis MN 55426 • • r L II 0 2Z 0' ST-0 e e e e e e a.r a e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e ...r e 4 2 STORAGE D 0 STORAGE D 0 STORAGE UTILITY -1'01 ee ee ee e• e===, ee ee •e ee ee e• ee —..a- ee e• t GARAGE LEVEL PLAN - ELEV 136' - 13131 NVp'` Y 1- 4 0 REVISIONS A SHEET TITLE 1 3 SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE SHEET 2 OF - FILE • • • B9 O 2m -O e4 -CD tem L - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T _ 1 4 DINING u Lr I STORAGE L LIVING PAT O 8TOR YIILII I STORAGE ICIT EN DINING LIVING TO &TOR 1 UTILITY STORAGE DINING LIVING GLO ...M... ... ■.■ ... ... ... ■.■ !OEM ...EMM MEM DEN LEVEL ONE PLAN ELEV 148' _J _ ��� I ��C•�: E-� d Z SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 4/2V00 SHEET OF — FILE • • • ire 20 0' ea0 I L 0111 01 10 01 V 1 1 BEDROOM IS X 12 BEDROOM 14 X 14 01 011. 0 BEDROOM IS X 12 ov nX BEDROOM 22 X14 T LINEN CLOSET _e 0_ ONSM 10 40. 001 MEININD 01, 01 0. 101P 01 40 01 01_i LEVEL TWO PLAN — ELEV 158' 10 1 _J tu-N1 I faj El YR a REVISIONS SHEET TITLE F H SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 4/2V00 0' 4 e SHEET 4 OF — FILE • • • 11S 0 20 -0 84 -0 1 ® -0 L CiIE8T OEDROOI'1 13 X 12 DIU I CLOSET MASTER BEDROOM 20'X14 KrralEN 13 X10 6 MIMED 40 INIMIM OFF UTILITY E DINNG DEN co LIO ISMIMMI IIMMIP 01 rr O LIVING ROOM 20')C16-6 •.) COVERED DECK 23 X S 6 OFEN DECK 12 X14 _1 - - - - - - - - - - - �' - - - - - - - e - - - -.� - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - LEVEL THREE PLAN - ELEV iron' _J 4 8 REVISIONS Z SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 4/2V00 SHEET 5 OF - FILE • .4S • • • MANUF STONE COPING FACE BRICK !Nui • Mil IN III! II ■I■■ 1CI ice■um ■�! 1a1 METAL FLASHING — PAINTED FACIA PANEL 1 ■ 111 E ME !N Irfll-j y`,4 - ■ EME E: -_--.:_ .____:- ii i.: i— -NU 1111 MN 2121 = ■■ _ ■mum=____________■.�— i.i ��ss������ �!�' mimmonsummlrms mlimmommisam— i. MANUF STONE COPING BUILDING IDENTIFICATIONM 4 DATE FACE BRICK W I RAILING NORTH -I ELEVATION ROCK FACED CMU 4 8 SCALE AS NOTED • DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 4/1Vm0 SHEET 6 OF — • FILE -1 • • • I • .... .""^••••.rimmtiii ETE-2 sramia Min= IME 111111111111111111111111111 I 11 11 I I 1 I 1 1 1111 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 1 1 1 I1 1 1 1 I 1 111 1 T11 1 I I I I I FE Ill" 111 tilt 1 r 1 1 I T 1 1 I I F_F111111 11 1 1 r"firli ILIII ri-rir 1 i 1 I -I 1 1 I1 1 11 11 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1**-4111 Ea' .70 E • Mr 3 0-7:-.M EMMI .11M.INON 111111•12a1MI 1.111.1 11 11111111 11.1111.1111 11111111111111 "....."911M11111A.411 El7ig I ITI I I 1 II II 1 I I 1 1 I 111111111011 th. 11411.11 wittM11111111/0 v4imilmilartuipsam. ....... nomnammsnirtrumi ilminlmsonsimournlYs.mniiiimZ= aarTfkl.-13 EZidtS,./ 2SalIaEJ11K-J. I. 1 ,INCWrAarE I T I 1 I I 1 T 11 1 1- 1 f I 1 1 II 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 F 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 -1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 11 I 1 IJ I_ 1 I_ 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I F I I -1 II 1 I 1 1 1 11 IJ r 1 1 1 I 1 III IIT 111 T 1 11 11 I I1 1 1 1 1 1 I III I 1 II I L I 1 1 I I I 1 11 T 1 I I T 1 f 1 1 11 I I 1 1 1 I 1 11 1 1 I11 I f 1 I 1 r 1 1I I 1 11 I 1 1 11 I 1 I I 111 -11T 1_L I 11 II J I 1 1_1 I 11 I L 1I1111 1 I 1 11 I I 1 I 1 I 11-111111 1 II • 1 I 1 I 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I rLF1-1-1T11-1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 11 1 1 I 1 1 1 f 1 1 EAST ELEVATION I 1 1 I 1111 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1.111 11 T 1 f I 1 111_11-1 L I 1 I 1 1 11 I I I I 1 I F1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 11 I 1 1 L I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I LI 1 1 0 4 8 12 LJ 1— ;1 4'1 E-1101:-F--, a Ili co 6 SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 412V00 'SHEET 7 OF FILE • METAL FLASHING - PAINTED FACIA PANEL 1,1 • • 11. r T T r r 3 STUCCO MODULAR FACE BRICK CLOTH AWNING DOUBLE -HUNG WINDOW 4111111111111111i 1111111111 MIME EN WI RAILING ROCK FACED CMU SOUTH ELEVATION REVISIONS a Z SCALE A9 NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 4!?V00 0' 4 9 SHEET 8 OF — FILE • • • mil METAL FLASHING PAINTED FACIA PANEL L r o 00 HH � 1 IT HH o WEST ELEVATION STUCCO MODULAR FACE BRICK CLOTH AWNING DOUBLE -HUNG WINDOW a, ÷.1)% 1- 4 C REVISIONS cr z SHEET TITLE SCALE AS NOTED DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER DATE 4/2Vo SHEET OF - FILE • SECTION • OLIVE STREET N cc • REVISIONS 0 Z SHEET TITLE SCALE I -t2 0 DRAWN BY CHECKED BY JOB NUMBER ROS DATE 5/VGDO 11 i i i ■■■•■ i i I ri-i i i i- •/ r tr r SHEET 10 OF — FILE • • • //i PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-29 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location 1920 Market Dnve Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicants Name David L Reimer, Urban Associates Type of Application Vanance Project Description Vanance to the side yard setback Discussion A 5 foot vanance to the side yard setback is requested to accommodate emergency access on the west side of the site A landscape area is next to that property border allowing the request Recommendation Approval Attachments Plans J • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* XVariance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $7 $500 $300 $100+$50 $1 00 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION • Address of Project 1820 Market Drive • 32-030-20-33-0008 Assessor's Parcel No 32-030-20-33-0016 Zoning Distnctcomm -PUD Descnption of Project 11,015 SF Restaurant and Retail ('anrPx "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Urban Associates/Stillwater Property Owner Marketplace III, LLC David L Reimer P rtY Representative 3601 Minnesota Drive, #880 3601 Minnesota Drive, #880 Mailing Address M,nneapolis. MN 55435 Mailing Address Minneapolis, MN 55415 Telephone No (952) 921- 2 , Telephone No Signature 4.--N- �t---- Signature Lot Size (dimensions) IRR Land Area 93,251 SF SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION x Height of Buildings Stones Principal 1 Accessory - Total building floor Area Existing ° sq ft Feet Proposed 11,ois sq ft 25 ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided 3 11,015 sq ft Revised 5/22/97 DELETE ONE ; ' • STILLWATER MARKETPARKINGSTALL PLACE RETAIL CENTER PHASE III PAINT PARKING STALL & INSTALL SIGN EMERGENCY VEHICLE PARKING ONLY MAKE PARKING STALLS 8 0 WIDE x 24 0 LONG MOVE SIDEWALK BACK fro TO BUILDING CORNER Off TENANT BUILDING AREA 11 015 SQ FT MECHANICAL AREA 121 SQ FT PARKING STALL DATA TOTAL 138 parking stalls standard parking stall 9-0 x 18 0 standard HC stall 96 x 18 0 with 60 space on side OTHRU REVISIONS APPROVED BY STILLWATER BUILDING DEPARTMENT & STILLWATER FIRE MARSHAL ON 4/24/2000 0 20 60 GRAPHIC 2/7/2000 • 120 SCALE 200 z ADD ONE PARKING STALL TRASH AREA 2 • MOVE TRASH ENCLOSURE 3 0 BACK FROM CORNER ADD 5 0° TO DRIVE MAKING THE TOTAL WIDTH 20 0 4 96 wide H C stalls with 260 wide space tween ro t • I • • • Memo To Steve Russell From Kim Kallestadf�/ c Date April 28, 2000 Subject Requested Variance for Stillwater Marketplace Phase III Approval of the requested five-foot variance on the northwest end of the Timberlodge Restaurant is needed to widen the proposed driveway If the variance is not approved, either the proposed building will have to be moved, which would cause the whole site to be redesigned, or emergency vehicles such as ambulances and fire trucks will not have safe vehicle access to the property Please convey my concerns to the Planning Commission, and let them know they are welcome to contact me if they have any questions 5- • Urban Associates, Inc. • s • 3601 Minnesota Dnve Suite 880 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone (612) 921-5822 Fax (612) 921-5801 Apnl 25, 2000 Steve Russell City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re Stillwater Marketplace III Stillwater, MN Dear Mr Russell Enclosed please find the application for variance and a check for the required $200 fee Also enclosed is a copy of the site plan showing the changes which we discussed at our meeting this morning If you need any additional information, please call Sincerely yours, David L Refiner President cc Kim Kallestad (via fax) Bill Sievers (via fax) Juns Cunskis (via fax) • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUB/00-30 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location Northwest Corner of County Rd 5 and TH 36 Comprehensive Plan District Campus Research and Development Zoning District CRD Applicants Name Jon Stumpt for Jim Bradshaw Type of Application Subdivision Project Description Request to subdivide 22 75 acre lot into 4 lots and 2 outlots Discussion The request is a 6 lot subdivision, 4 developable lots and 2 outlots The site is located at the northwest corner of CR 5 and TH 36 and runs along TH 36 to the west The site is in the Phase I Comprehensive Plan expansion area requinng review by the Joint Board The area is designated Campus Research and Development in the Comprehensive Plan and zoned Campus Research and Development Attached is the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 1), Zoning Map (Map 2) and Campus Research and Development Zomng Ordinance These documents provide the policy basis for reviewing the project The project is within the Brown's Creek Watershed District and will have to abide by the recently adopted Brown's Creek Watershed Distnct rules Other City policies that effect the development of this land include the recently approved 62nd Street North Area Plan and Tree Preservation Ordinance The Proposal The plans submitted include a location map, aenal photograph of the site (L-1), existing conditions map (L-2), development plan map (L-3), site plan map (L-4), preliminary grading and utility plan (C-1 and C-2) and tree inventory (C-3 and C-4) The proposal is to subdivide the 22 75 acres of land into 4 lots and 2 outlots The development lots are 6 16 acres (Bradshaw lot), 3 37 acres (Lot 1), 3 24 acres (Lot 2) and 3 15 acres (Lot 3) Outlots A and B of 2 47 acres and 4 34 acres are shown The outlots would be maintained in their existing open condition with trails Outlot B is covered with pine trees and slopes steeply to the west Outlot A separates and buffers the site form the residences to the rear (north) Joint dnveway access is proposed for Lots A, D and C Stormwater infiltration ponds are located in outlot areas A six foot aggregate trail is proposed connecting to the existing trail to the north and extending to the westerly outlot The trail forms a circular path for recreation use of the site Curve Crest Boulevard is extended to the western lot on the site The development plan shows desired setbacks for the development as 15 feet front, 15 feet rear and 15 foot side These are different from the CRD zomng setback requirements as discussed below A drainage/grading plan is provided but no landscape plan or tree impact calculations or tree protection plan as required by the new tree protection ordinance Analysis The site is in the Campus Research and Development zomng distnct, CRD The distnct regulations prescribes the future use of the lots and also include lots size and setback requirements The minimum lot size requirements is 5 0 acres Three of the four lots are smaller than the requirements Setback requirements are 50 feet front, 20 feet side yard and 75 feet rear (residential) The proposal shows building setback of 15 feet front, 15 feet side and 15 feet rear The rear setback is extended by the open space outlot and the front setback for lots 1 and 2 is extended by the stormwater drainage area The trail and open space areas frame the site mcely and extend public access and use of the area The trail system and open space complements city policy regarding preservation of natural open space areas, Highway 36 Stillwater entry landscape and residential buffenng and extend the expansion area CR 5 trail system A landscape plan with selective trees, scrub planting and ground cover planting would improve the appearance of the open space area particular outlot A and the stormwater area The trail along Curve Crest Blvd should be an 8 foot bituminous trail to connect to a further extension to the west and east Shared driveway easements should be provided with the final plat The dnveway access at the corner of CR 5 and TH 36 should be further considered for site distance and safety The City Engineer has reviewed the engineenng aspects of the project and has prepared a wntten comment (attached) The plans have been referred to MnDot, Washington County Public Works and Stillwater Township for comment There comments will be incorporated into the preliminary plant review before it is heard by the City Council Recommendation Approval Conditions of Approval 1 The setback for Lot 3 shall be 25 feet front, 40 feet west side, 15 foot rear and 15 foot east side 2 A parking area shall be provided for trail access 3 Outlots A and B shall be dedicated to the City as part of park dedication 4 The trail along the access roads shall be 8 foot bituminous trail • • • • • 5 The dnveway access at the corner of CR 5 and 36 shall be reviewed for safety 6 A detail landscape plan for the drainage area and Outlots as appropnate shall be provided and improved by the Community Development Director with subdivision improvements 7 The trail and landscaping shall be installed with subdivision improvements 8 A tree impact table and tree protection plan shall be provided before final plat approval 9 Comments from the City Engineer shall be incorporated into final development plans before final plat approval 10 Comments from Brown's Creek Watershed District, MnDot, Washington County Public Works and Stillwater Township shall be incorporated into plan before final plan approval 11 The Parks Board shall review and approve dedication of Outlots A and B and trail improvements in heu of park dedication 12 Future lot development shall require administrative design review Attachments Application, plans and maps PP. 1 ,LIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 1 APPLICANT Name Company - Address JONI STVMPF /,ore..14 4- S'rJr11PF + AS.soc,IATES 1 INac, 40O Fti i r AV*. N Si)rrE $ 11D City M I I-wlsart, GIs State M Rl Zip Code. c r,4 b Telephone ( ilny ll Soto (FA-)4r'A 59o7(H) 2 PROPERTY FEE OWNER J 1 M clAR-A.'p514 A J Name Company Address FEE PAID 'l dv6 14A.vJ Fv1.ti✓L- S Eriv1 [.otpi osemoov AV N City STIG14-m.r State MI`l Zip Code S5o % - Telephone M. .4e .3,.} ,1 (FA f(1)t 4 ?ioiZ(H) 1 3 SURVEYOR Name Company Address 1 Aso k 11- (e oR-) MMpNS - oL MLR- Zt-e-sovR-Let5 '228.2.5 L-AeL.Mo Ave_ IJ City LAy K LM o State MN-1 Zip Code Ss o 1-i 1- Telephone (Wtf 1)?Ro .'44 >zi(FA1 r"s1)770 w2(H) 4 Property Location Legal Description Nv.t t..012-ceQ. hF +l 476, t. HIca14v.~ 5 Inrre-0-ssoc.-r1o'4 17A1z--r of -roe s 'fy op-reke st='/4I oN. 31 1 T *n WAS f.{ 1►J LrTo ►.1 C-a UNTY 1-1 1Nt4ES cr A 5 Name of development Number of lots Current land use Proposed land use Current zoning Proposed zoning Anticipated project completion E. 4t',t4 U - TV-ap•F.ft-TY N1.1£ 15VS iN G 5 PAR AM'Pv9 'R- 7'F.Ag- 4-k - D eVE,LAPMEt Ci12-17 - C.RMYvg 12-SSEAR-tA4 k_ 'De.vEWPM•GrT 6 SUBMITTAL REQU1 EMENTS (14 copies and 1 reduced 8' " x 11") x Preliminary Plat (PP) Tree Preservation and Landscapmg Plan (TLP) �- Street and Utility Plan (SUP) 74 Grading, Drainage, Storm Water and Wetlands Plan (GDSWP) Other Information (01) 8 1" x 11" Transparency I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are complete and accurate per City requirements I .:: and that the application will be processed when it has been found to be complete and adequate by the Community elopm nt Director Property Fee Owner(s) Signa Apphcant(s) Signature(s) Date Ai 20 orb PLEASE NOTE. If Property Pee Owner is NOT the applicant, the Apphcant must provide written authorization b Property Fee Owner in order to make annlicathnn 3l .019.0413.06 1) &opY • • • PA 1 Name Address PRE -APPLICATION FORM Jim Bradshaw, Bradshaw Funeral Service 6061 Osgood Avenue North Stillwater, MN 55082 Telephone 612-489-3467 (W) 2 Name of proposed development pending (H) Bradshaw Development Number of lots fire 3 Legal descnption part of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 31, T30, R20 Washington County, Minnesota Size of property in acres approximately 2316 acres 4 Current use of property- no current use Proposed use of property small business park Current zoning of property CRD Proposed zoning of property CRD campus research and development Natural resources located on property mature red pine forest, mixed hardwoods, grasses Historic resources located on property NA 5 Submittal Requirements - Sketch Plan (SP) Appli Date (1479 R2IW R2OW R19W P 2W R2IW R2OW Mandy Map 0 443 Scale in Feet Tlia draft Iv Pe aCr d minlroads 1N wpm In reps w �Nb A Owing !wood Mom at Wa1v{}n Cary Is rat rapvvdY6 �Ymna. FMa(l01���4�# Gh ina+ el. Imo m AS03 YinrMm �a�ne rep m ai�oa mm • City of Mto • • • \q� RR OP Phase IV* — 2015 RR RR 1 Sill RR L Phasc l j 0 Sisl L 1996J�vs - - t \ .+L Ph ISC 1 1996 SFSL SFLL Ci L Pest t SFLL 3.\ iwater COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Proposed Land Use Pioposed L Intl Use (Cat)) Rcsidcnti il SI7 L s ngl Family large Lot SI.SL S nyle Familt Small Lot 3 \SI \tta hod Single Familk - \IT \lulu 1 amdv Count iclul 4'9 \ \ ighborhood Comm rcial C Lommuntty Comm atal Busin P irk I3PC Bu mess Park Commerc al - B'0 Business Park 019ke 4.0 kdmmistrati ti Office BPI B .:.O K.14 nitactctyl�� RDP Rcs arch di De% lopman Park) Institutional NM SS Secondary S hool I S Flom nlan S hool CF_\l Coin tap Public - PM \lartna . 1 P\ \ ghl orhood 1 arl. - PC Comm niu 1 ark 1 PC t olf Coors U ate:* � '3 .11and area OPS Op nt Spa e RAIL Railroad ROM. Right of \\ ay TOTAL SFLL Y Section Linea f Cit Limns Railroad // Streams Acres 1 236 37 727 49 75 3 64 65 137 44 09 141 66 23 95 4561 11831 28 07 4396 5190 38 77 14 00 9\ 59 78 32 301 15 6108 60 52 10141 29 7d 705,0 Percent 2( 38 15 8n u 99° 141 U 0° 0)6 3 08° 0 5)° 0 99' 157' II61 096 1 la 084 0 11 10 06 6 55 I 18 1 2° 10 0 65 15 a d 599 25 100 00% 7 City of Mater Zoning Map Zoning Classifications ACRES PERCENT RESIDENTIAL AP AGRICULTURE 221.27 4 76% ( ) - ONE FAMILY 1444 10 31 26% TWO FAMILY 922 63 19 97% ® MEDIUM DENSITY FAMILY 38 31 0 83% © HIGH DENSITY FAMILY 1 44 0 03% CD COTTAGE RESIDENTIAL 68 31 0 61% ® TRADmONAL RESIDENTIAL 82 26 1 78% ® TOWN HOUSE 47 60 t 02% CA LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL 45 38 0 98% BUSINESS PARK 41210 BUSINESS PARKCOMMERCL.L • BUSINESS PARK INDUSTRIAL ® BUSINESS PARK OFFICE ® GENERAL HEAVY INDUSTRY CO CAMPUS RESEARCH & DEV CIAL CD PUBLIC CV O) (fa GENERAL COMMERCIAL CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES RAILROAD LAKES & RIVERS Right -of way shp ISLANDS 135 13 2 93% 11768 255% 31 51 0 68% 445 010% 2806 061% 479 010% 2806 061% 933 020% 87 0 50% 59 0 55% 610 i 13 20% 73235 1585% 30 48 0 66% 4,659 13 100 00% PHASE IV' • • • 31 1 STILLWATER CODE the lapse of the specified re- sponse penod notify the land- owner to restore the land to the condition which existed pnor to the violation of this subdivi- search.andevel research and devvl; c s aUJ e-regulated as folloiON (1) Purpose The purpose of the CRD d s nct is to allow a mix of office, research and development and light manufactunng uses with limited retail and service uses in a planned business park setting designed to provide for low -density, high -quality de- velopment with increased amenities and open space (2) Special use permit required' No building, structure, land or premises in the CRD district may be used and no building or structure may be directly constructed, ex- cept for the following uses, that are per- mitted by a special use permit a. Administrative offices associated with other permitted uses b Manufacturing, processing, fabrica- tion or assembling of limited com- modity except junk or storage c Laboratones d Printing and publishing e Photo processing f Research establishment of indus- trial, medical or scientific nature g Chemical laboratories h Service uses including advertising, consultant services and engineering, arclutects and designers i Funeral homes Any other use or service establish- ment determined by the planning commission to be of the same gen eral character as the foregoing spe- cially permitted uses and which will not impair the present or potential use of adjacent properties CD3140 (3) Height and area regulations The maxi- mum height of buildings and structures and the minimum dimensions of lots and yards in the CRD district are as follows a. Maximum height of all structures, 40 feet or three stories b Minimum setbacks 1 All buildings or structures must be set back a minimum of 50 feet from any pubhc street nght- of-way forming the penpheral property line of the business park 2 All buildings must be set back a minimum of 30 feet from any internal street nght-of-way 3 All buildings or structures must be set back a minimum of 75 feet from the property hne of any residentially zoned prop- erty, where adjacent property is already developed for residen- tial use or is designated resi- dential on the city's comprehen- sive plan 4 All buildings or structures must be set back a minimum of 20 feet from any penpheral prop- erty hne other than a street nght of -way line or residen- tially zoned property 5 All parking areas must be set back a minimum of 20 feet from any street right-of-way 6 All parking areas must be set back a minimum of 30 feet from the property hne of any residen- tially zoned property, where ad- jacent property is already de- veloped for residential use or is designated residential use on the city's comprehensive plan 7 All parking areas must be set back a minimum of ten feet from any penpheral property line other than a street right- of-way or residentially zoned property • Li7 ZONING (4) Parking and loading regulations Parking and loading regulations in the CRD dis- trict are as follows a Each establishment must provide suf- ficient off street parking spaces for all employees, customers and visi- tors The number of parking spaces must be determined at the tune of preluninary development plan ap- proval, but in no event may there be less than three spaces for each 1,000 square feet of total floor area or portion thereof shown on the plan and in no event may there be less than 3 8 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of total floor area of office and research buildings Some parking may, at the discretion of the plan- ning commission or city council, be built in stages b Each estabhshment must provide an adequate loading space within a building or in a side or rear yard, in a way that will allow all storage, standing and maneuvering of trucks to be off the public right-of-way c No portion of a parking or loading space, including maneuvenng area, except the necessary dnves, may be located closer than 20 feet from a public street nght-of-way (5) Development and performance standards Development and performance standards in the CRD district are as follows a The minimum parcel size of property is five acres unless a parcel is part of an overall development plan for the area b All operations must be conducted within a fully enclosed building c No outside storage of materials, prod- ucts or equipment is permitted other than in trash receptacles which must be completely screened utilizing the same building matenals as the main building, unless the outside storage is specifically approved as part of a preliminary development plan �311 d No use may produce or emit from vent, stack, chimney or combustion process any smoke darker than Ringlemann No 1, except that smoke darker than Ringlemann No 2 is permissible for a duration of not more than four minutes during any eight -hour period if the source of the emission is not located within 250 feet of residentially zoned property e Noise levels may not exceed 80dB(A) at repeated intervals or for a sus- tained length of time measured at any point along the property hne f No activity is permitted that creates any electrical disturbance that ad- versely affects any operations or equipment other than those of the creator of the disturbance or which otherwise causes, creates or contrib- utes to the interference with elec- tronic signals (including television and radio broadcasting transmis- sions) to the extent that the opera- tion of any equipment not owned bye the creator of the disturbance is ad versely affected g The minimum landscaped open space ratio for the CRD distnct will be 30 percent h No loading dock may face any street unless a screening plan therefor is approved as part of final plan ap- proval (6) Design permit A design review permit is required for all CRD campus research and development distract uses according to the design review standards of this section (Ord No 828, 9-13-96) ubd^23 _Bluffland/shoreland overlay dts t F a�idlsTioreland aav�s cis hall big ate'tl'as follows - IPuipore'"Tlinin-poibes of this bluffland/ shoreland overlay distnct are as follows a Designating suitable land use dis- tncts along the bluffland and shoreland of the Lower St Croix River CD3141 Lie • • Memorandum To Steve Russell, Community Development Director From Klayton Eckles, City Engineer )L6-� Date 05/03/00 Subject Proposed Development of the Bradsaw Property DISCUSSION I have reviewed the proposed development concept for the Bradsaw property located at the intersection of County Road 5 and Highway 36 Generally, this project accommodates the City's ultimate plan for a frontage road connection along Highway 36 from Highway 5 to County Road 15 The project also includes innovative design concepts for storm water management and environmental protection From an engineenng perspective however, there are a number of issues and details concerning the proposed design that need further attention Each of these issues is presented below The access road is shown as a 24 foot wide street However, the proposed frontage road design will be to State standards and consists of a 36-foot wide street The proposed access road also stops short of the west end of the property Since the frontage road will ultimately be a through street providing access to this development from east and west, any street project in this area should be completed up to the edge of the property The proposed nght-of-way dedication only supports a 24-foot wide access road, which again is not acceptable In this case, additional nght-of-way would be needed (approximately eight feet) The development shows a number of trails through the area that should provide excellent recreation opportunities for the public The trail shown along Curve Crest Boulevard frontage road should be shown as an eight -foot wide blacktop trail Regarding the other trail layout and design, it may be desirable to involve the Park Board on this issue All trailways on pnvate property will require separate trail easement document filed with the plat The storm water management concept for this project involves the concept of infiltration basins as opposed to storm water management ponds Infiltration basins are somewhat expenmental and innovative The concept is that rather than allowing water to run off, the water will percolate into the ground This concept requires May 3 2000 greater ponding areas and improved maintenance over a typical design It appears that this design does include additional ponding areas, however, the Engineenng Department would like to review the calculations for the sizing of these ponds and a maintenance plan should be provided The storm water plan shows overflow discharge from the infiltration basins flowing onto Mn/DOT nght-of-way This concept would require approval from Mn/DOT as well as a permit Historically, Mn/DOT has been reluctant to grant these types of permits The proposed project shows watermain serving the site from the east This concept would result in a 1600-foot long dead end line serving this development Ultimately, a watermain loop to the west into the Bergmann property would be appropriate Therefore, the proposed watermain should be shown to extend toward the western edge of the property At this time, the City has not received a petition for any of the actual improvements, nor has a detailed discussion taken place on the timing or cost recovery of these improvements Based on the plan provided, it appears that the developer would be responsible for all of the underground utilities and approximately half the cost of a commercial street design The developer should consider shared parking use for these sites Although at this time it is premature because we do not know the actual uses of the sites, shared parking can reduce hard surface areas, which is an environmental benefit Most of the Engineering Department comments at this time surround the pubhc utilities that will serve this site and other sites to the west It appears that additional discussions need to take place with the developer to resolve these issues, because nght-of- way widths and easements can affect the way the site is developed • 2 • • • • • i i 17; Sn IwN �v�. r�rr r n4<h *um SfW u' XIV coc + mpf. SA A ',71.4140K Bradshaw Property'-n 1 I wf , yYC 9q 004 IRS/1n0.SE Jaam 3 T 2. V0 pr .ry now 411 ar a 1r,f 44 4-3 --v�4t Kk r+cT Wo.htewpv",0 4 >n15 } preliminary plat documents for Bradshaw Property cr r / r 4uu to ❑IIO1I NW corner of highway 36 and highway 5 nterterseclion sheet index cover L1 L2 L3 L4 Cl C2 C3 C4 ldc_rton rnap aerial photograph existing conditions devolopmelt plan site plan proltmrnary grading and access road profile prelims 1ary Jtrltty plan tree inventory overall tree inventory N E dt.tail Sr in. ID3o. sheet index & location map Aim cover `1A Ift '_w 1. •�1:%k�' •�x ttlaialk w �+ •'44 '.t. .,. r y,n• fir • p tjm.s wsi raaJly4..' 1 raiatOl11o/4 YreJ,rr�VwV'ac+ l !a) Y kmow nd 4) pf L 14 SALA hJ Iy. e Bradshaw Property oI t J iJILL w41 Jen 114 tarialtY �x 9 jp or ^e i �» loci r w , aict• 'mow' } ir.440 1 7 d — aerial photograph '4 y. W-t€^l�y' s; �rjx':r 2.ZYYR::� yy 4.400.4IV M4 L • • • • • 1 1 p op a.ieerahnvgr aurwuae.Y�I�noComm. Yalf ored H.• ate. NOR coon + stump( tol 1-1/4 ro a...w:•0,01m no }la 1eA V I1rlIW SALA- --; •it name samara h highly y o a6 a1 o n 1 o.J IDur ,d{ wish g bradshew property approximate y 23 16 acres anent Song of the property is CAD (campus research end development) Bradshaw Property Stillwater Minnesota IEex mmxfbtbi Pad d er SIR of Er SE W dw Serena 3 733.1620 wMFpnd Carry Unman nmwr gum ( V Soda Ire CO Imo dv. existing conditions L2 fret pr pre ty 7- � \ l 1 pry 44- 1,��',}'A 4 � .. t ois r vtnurITnp¢ta- — — f cm111/111 prep rt9 � Vl II op t .00 r I, p tr I 10.100. 1h0mu p b Ipso p pe tYt{�+��'. �{,� PO 91 P party tgioe '1 Y ,ice f517yipti 1, k hi i tom, n_{�y��4� ..''� 0'� �ATA 4 iR'aa�s � LeN�'1 .� I ' �s •' ` w.p d �' Y"p,Ln.w-V.tf rigor — oPPP — / r i — `sl properly attained through dervelapmem gt property sold for fuhae development Y / f /). / ` \\ / -ear ..vs.z7X. •:r?'nrle•.� Y.':..-;':"7t,. ;. �:. r1.±ref .r. ...�w.erc�'4..a FT.rT'_F' ,7F_ r_ ?,ttrr.Aw7:?LEsc.3._ RS���%�7- "';.;•LL ru,r�+,s ':se:1�.:.4t.1�,ryL �l4+r,,. _,.r _.td:.-,.,Nx.J7 _�..r.,r tM, n*r+r_.u.r ._�,u. v. ....,s Ln Breddw araa,ravw arm Coen + stump( ri$I`^t''/"+t'S'4 00 gm w. u 0 S wa mower ssro ✓ -8 rams tsTvsw Bradshaw Property Stillwater Minnesota t Desoir.a, Arid o.avl Who SE r datum d T70. il20. Woollen Cane 1Un.m development plan L 3 nw.d+w..r • • • • • • p.pm1 / AIM -asomeale. mils 1. i ~oft I. m . I •rpitl.Os.M r..1..m41l soma pro/Wq Is / 5 DEt141711E41 a./.p/sa1 Yeas MO ✓ ▪ ,�� .u. ,p. MD-O.r i` Dolton J J - boo . al 11.00. D.m.wm. •mmlm /OOIRAILrw nee SW. ▪ " Omni Pp•W maW Pas.. RAWbwmem soma moss. moo ma m O 001 RPM Drmlma. MOO w Midways,' Wpm / nY / vs./®teP a ROP ma lb al Otl / / erne ot.pr myIAA _and ✓J• m1 mm Wa►lNrralb Mos d /` / J / /l MMus ILIA W.mmma,ge.aAAA put f /reirt �r wD Dm+ el row Mom rep. Damp. r... w R.•rps rood i .sass / Rf WYeeo MIA Doi NAIL -7 AV a proposed 9lmm aler management areas la sae / / / /a P.•utl•mile p1pR.•nrDA \ med.rm4 Ma /\�Y {{ ,r �95�F i}� i Rm RAF errs 'NM ms 2 oo. 1P mlnlesum F L ISi aJ 3,_ .10 a .. ..o.•1 24 I z M se wr6R4 NOW Q.r popo..d nt r _SV twat fens 011116 miaow A � le tiT .A��f�i _ _raj 0 bit rta IWe. r1m maao0aw r..r howl owl 0•=111.• Mo.* W Orr MD coon + stumpf 00 R..wes& rib W Nim.4.Sere we r Ai ADD r -MOW SALA---1 .00.1 14.0 e• ..vam ••mm.a NM Bradshaw Property Stillwater Minnesota Per<ROOSEiMD 20 alto L .dsmm 91 170.0n1 Ovary 91 Iarravois site plan L 4 , �II s 4y r IF r 1� .r tip+•% L - - 'War 40 ACCESS ROAD PROFILE 1 Iw wr ah .. Il T= 1 T pB] ` ; - �' .6'� r s I I — mr s. m — '— I � mY w i B i LI'"`��L l; ~F 1 ; i -ieI a — —�-1— - — , -1 L5o -i --- - , , a 1 I 1' I 1 1—j L p�w.d .... pl21 4 I I --w-1'I t- t 1 — —T— ) —I j—T—icae MOE I I I I Is Wil 20 11 1 frti ar —or / i/�, y / 7 ' LEGEND 1--0 L p.- - -.—ro I� LMM 4S WI L101f0 RCM WAVE / YK LS ellOa:m SAM 01.01929 / Yx t a COSI= COMA NOM° coma MOM= WO 11L0w99111 L Y YI f M. MI WNW. 2(?!— /. WWI e.s< TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD SECTION (OKI. a MM. ) PTV &per MUM.aWI W. womb ui br Ir O .2. adic4.. Coen + slump *mak mel. HOl YYILYID bOLEEYO SAL - - — e >�.I P auula r 1 s�ps.es9 sump La 1.1 pdemtpld Lmi est. 20J24 ) RIoaon' Property $1JI V Mumesoto nILb9LY44u Scan n➢ladlp. CqY® lamr.rwalganraalm. NE. NEWNARY GRADING FLAN 8 FRONTAGE ROAD PROf4E Cl • • • • • • L,.________ ...........„ ,t, __� t �, "77. 1 I / C., k 1..) ,_ (:". / 1 //j / 1 fir( �� �- I�L , i �l� .. ` / , / 1 Ilf 111 I q\,_ I !t .. v-TA(- w �-�l'-� �y �,"y�` / S r / + '/ a/I I I Y �' 'L..- 1 • __,, J , 1 (i 71r ... ' f ; ,rI T . / r / { /A / �/ I - \ J 0/1 oliao Ime rm r 109. r a ma ATur on Roe r w. sue /ruc V w w 'd �� / / / /�_ 1 r e 1 00 VY, �s t�ma ducrag ) /I' o. OM �r -- =J I 60 ava r m / / w av >ti i / / / / / / / LEGEND J PROPOSED r.tOr.r / EL MOW. TEAM fl_•_ maosm S1N M Yu / tln —0_ _ PROPOSED OM sM / C6 • i S. -+--. MOM ulquur / G rm.Tt • MOMS —n+—v— MING SWIM S.ER / Yl. 0 — eo510 VOW SYO / R. CIA • RES O 1 Y m m 0 la a OrIM. POO in auhn= 110.10. m a.nm 10.0101 1. Plana coen f alom1l qrS ewe ow IA TO Ponoinawdeb e s align ■=UP mgwrFq upping g.&nmq 01 000 Balim Properly $hllwda Almneso10 narfvarau�d OIRg41YTON mama lawn. MAMA PR9IAUNARYRUN RAN C2 1 �\ Ii r G J� �jr R ! / / 0 / /j ` try 1 r` l�ir/ / � IR / — it - --- —\ ^ l , i 1 i — , u ` 1 1 / / I I i' ' 1 11j r 1 ,'� /y� i ( Si�1 II ilr �1— -rN ! / // / I 11 I I i _i I r_ �� f� I 1 h 7~ �� /1� // /y i___ _ _ — - _ — \ �' / / f r ~ I I I I - // MATURE aEts \ //> L / W-LJA TR E - SEE SKEET c 6FOR DETAILED �// I INFORMATION ON TREES PI MS AREA El, / / / �� "\ to, �y'�y�y / r PERCENT COVERAGE O' TREE SPECIES geSl at}� %,� �� / /�' 1 ,SIZE TREESPECIES % i�lS��'� // 1 I r r rnw» / / / / 1 t r J/P w.TA N... / w rn000 / i i % r () I r U !TRIO '' i `' "ri14 J l' / L r ' I �^ ' NMI awl i' S ��'LP_ — ^, /per r i ` r r eeOXMO i, fl 3 d r �� L J r clEw t? / ( L..: I rvRr 6— / / r. \ �� 1 I fATUR-7R ES It _ — — "' -- / / /\ \ �� ' �__ _ _I_ _ _-_-'— 'I r / /� / �- 1 --J-- -_ -� / i L-- _ —_ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - 1 _,_ LEGEND �' �•• TREE UNE INOIVIDUAL DECIDUOUS TREE 413 INDIVIDUAL CONIFEROUS TREE P a m m Offer in Dothan I1WoIffeorffelel�` eNrne e. Orr rr SOW .1rMahn coen + slump! +n me. IS O - DURAN bWJRaa adReedr S A I ---� A et forff I engeNocg / aasgng ircv pefMur pld doommU &oislww Property %hater Minnesota Fr St/MIMS Nall IN RI coy WOOS f einv F. ens aoonenl TREE MIRY COVERNE) RAIN • • • • • • /:, ,}s,, ° / //, h�ex r / /f r t 1� J ▪ - " F34 4, / ,../ / - / t .4 � f 4 O / �/Q' / -er. �,p...__ r S _t / // // \/ / fro/ ,z ✓ o i �,� / e / / / d r Q/ / // ' / / / s .1 / / // / . i j,/ / ' f �. // r' // 6 JUNI— _ iW // / ( / - ° _ _ // 1 1 ) / ) LEGEND / TREE UNE NDMDWL TREE (SEE TABLE FOR SPEOES & SIZQ r y v 0 o Errm TREE INVENTORY 01 slm/— RUM POLO 041 33.1 11301 0001 11113 omr 10.0 KUM 101 0 IA DM WU om ▪ 011 Ea UM as PNm O WO 0 OM 1301 1°"P ▪ 1100 oom 0/0 0300 ▪ 0.013 u•1 u nom 011 NM 0 ▪ 001 10 UM 100 r• • Om om O M 01 O OM 101 0 UM 00 MA ▪ 1311 ▪ Plia 133 MI 10 II 113411 Ili 010 dom rum /orl) Ira • l•nm 131.1.1 MA 601 dMO mWO Mu 0113 _m nnm 02 03 oom 0. us Its 103 me no 0.010 011.1 tos OA om ro• 00 SD KM MO mom vm./orl Y DM num Ma 603 om® as ,N Bmdm amisTaosit 100 ar* - IIOQ Goer s stump) IN 6d suss as ID — r.00 03 a • ovnao r fli. SAL — MUM 1100:4, 11030 1 •qu0 y suunly mr dn,m,yw de,..•r Bradshaw properly Stillwater Minnesota hoop FadnswdtsSEVi emmmmorgp Cudmideus keno ▪ Am 0.04.01000. ✓ ▪ 1u.� 2`054 TREE 114YENTORY ME DETAIL( OUPOLCO C4 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SV/00-31 Planning Commission Date May 8, 2000 Project Location The west 20 feet of Sunset Drive Comprehensive Plan District Single Family Residential Zoning District RA Applicants Name Ryan Smith Type of Application Street Vacation Project Description A request to vacate the westerly 20 feet of Sunset Dnve north of Sunnyslope Lane Discussion The request is to vacate the westerly 20 feet of Sunset Dnve A wetland is located in the right of way and the City Engineer does not object to the vacation request It is recommended that the Commission continue the request so that vacation of the entire nght of way can be reviewed as recommended by the City Engineer Recommendation Continue to the 6/12/00 for public hearing on vacation of Sunset Dnve from Myrtle end of dnve north of Sunnyslope • Memorandum • • To Steve Russell, Community Development Director From Klayton Eckles, City Engineer K-5 Date 05/03/00 Subject Proposed Vacation of Sunset Boulevard DISCUSSION Engineenng has reviewed the proposed street vacation of Sunset Boulevard The vast majority of this proposed vacation is of a wetland and adjacent to City parkland Therefore, the majonty of the land will actually transfer from the City to the City The proposal only includes the western half of the nght-of-way The Engineenng Department does not see any compelling reason to not also vacate the eastern portion, however that portion is not part of the public heanng, therefore can not be completed as part of this process The only concern that the department would have regarding this vacation is near the cul-de-sac We would wish to maintain access from the road to the pond and maintain sufficient easements over the City storm sewer that controls the elevation of this pond tllwater v � • THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA of CITY OF STILLWATER PETITION TO VACATE PUBLIC STREET (20 ir0 The undersigned hereby petition that all that portion of114c Oes 4 4' / JjLt k Y'v 1-iI- VO Vso.f.?i `V✓11.v.- AO. C j 3 / e i abutting Lots , Block 3 ���•,� 01-19 Addition, in the City of Stillwater, hereby be vacated • Name Address 44.„ , Z 9- P4,4 v+--otre D.- Al *Attach a map showing the street to be vacated Fee $100 Receipt No CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 • Ryan Smith Brandon Smith City Hall Planning Commission 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 Dear Planrung Commission Members 127 Birchwood Dnve North Stillwater MN 55082 Telephone (651) 430-2479 May 2, 2000 My name is Ryan Smith, and I, along with my brother, Brandon Smith own a house at 127 Birchwood Dnve North in Stillwater We have requested that the City of Stillwater vacate the West half of the northern portion of Sunset Dnve in the Rearrangement of Rages Sunnyslope Addibon to Stillwater (see attached maps) The legal descnption is Westerly twenty feet (20ft) fdlowing centerline to the South Easterly comer of Lot 5 Block 3 Rearrangement of Rages Sunnyslope Addition to Stillwater When the ongnal development was platted in 1956, and the rearrangement of Radles Sunnyslope Addition in 1958, the Wetlands Act of 1979 was not fully in effect Since the ad was not in effect, the developer, Mr Rade, platted the northern part of Sunset Drive in a pond and wetland After the Wetlands Act came into effect, ponds and wetlands could no longer be filled Currently, ninety percent (90%) of the northern portion of Sunset Dnve is under water and is not suitable for bolding This platted street was never constructed and a cul-du-sac was built in its place This has left an unused nght of way in our backyard and has caused unnecessary lot line radiuses These lot line oddities were created Men the rearrangement was created Before the rearrangement of Radles Sunnyslope Addtion the back line of our lot was straight, which is where we are proposing the vacation retum it to The vacation of half of this nght of way will make our lot a traditional rectangular lot and let us use the portion of our land that the platted nght of way has made useless We are petitioning only a partial street vacation in order to maintain nght of way for the existing street, utilities, and legal access to pnvately held properties The Easterly half of Sunset Drive has a storm sewer pipe located in a portion of it to control the pond elevation The aty may deade to maintain the easterly half of the nght of way since it contains a small portion of the auldu-sac and would provide for future street maintenance and snow storage This half of the nght of way would also offer twenty feet (20ft) of legal nght of way access to the two remaining pnvately held Tots on the easterly side of Sunset Dnve (which is underwater) The other remaining lots are property of the aty parks department and have other access pants There is also a small stnp of land connecting these pnvately held Tots to the cul-du-sac All of these pnvate Tots are owned by Swager Brothers who originally developed the surrounding properties and are on a slope of thirty percent (30%) or greater I have also contacted Swager Brothers to inquire about the vacation, and they feel rt should be completely vacated and that the vacation of the nght of way would have no consequence to them or their tots These Tots are also to be published for tax forfeit this week and placed in public auction by August The City of Stillwater wll most likely purchase the lands for parkland at that time and would benefit from the street vacation I have also discussed this vacation with klayton Ecldes the City Engineer and the City's Engineenng Department would have no reservations against a partial vacation City Engneenng would only require an nacement around their storm sewer pipe that is on the eastem side of the street Mr Ecldes expressed no reservation about a full vacation should the commission deem that necessary We know rt is non-tradbonal for the city to vacate only hatf of a nght of way and has only done partial vacation's a handful of times We have spoken with the majonty of our neighbors within five hundred feet (500 ft) and have their signed letters of support for the vacation We hope that the planning commission wll see the logic behind a partial or full vacation and grant it We greatly appreaate your time and consideration If there are any questions or concems, please feel free to contact Ryan Smith at 430-2479 (home) or 430-8833 (work) or Brandon Smith at 430-2479 (home) or 275- 1936 (work) �T ,•--, 3 Map Design by Ryan Smith (651) 430-2479 1 LINDE water ri 3 37 12 27 12 ,--1±2 L e WEST MYRTL ST Proposed Area of Sunset Drive to Vacate 200 0 200 Feet • 1 \-� 1 1.9 • cc 1 w • • • 0 PARK =xs Proposed Area of Sunset Drive to Vacate Map Design by Ryan Smith 100 0 100 Feet (651) 430 2479 • • Letter of Support I / We hereby support the vacation of the portion of Sunset Drive listed below I / We have seen and understood the area to be vacated I / We were explained to what a street vacation actually is and fully support the petition 2 1.13 i` SUNNYSLOPE—LANE— \ ' T { r 1 } { t 4 ,,, ,d" 'al icy T __ _WEST MYRTLE / A portion of Sunset Drive as follows The portion that Ices west of centerline of Sunset Drive and north of the Southerly Right of Way line of Sunnyslope Lane ending at the South Easterly corner of Lot 5 Block 3 Rearrangement of Radles Sunnyslope Addition (127 Birchwood Dr N) We the undersigned support the partial vacation of Sunset Drive YNa> r A tess 4tQL_L \ \-1 6 i1pL)& tw4l Ukcl 16/06 Tic/ ti�16AltrA<A_ /5i2 Ign • Letter of Support I / We hereby support the vacation of the portion of Sunset Drive listed below I / We have seen and understood the area to be vacated I / We were explained to what a street vacation actually is and fully support the petition «3 101 14`}9 r--1 r rC a 124iiidp7 WEST MYRTL(, / A portion of Sunset Drive as follows The portion that Ices west of centerline of Sunset Drive and north of the Southerly Right of Way line of Sunnyslope Lane ending at the South Easterly corner of Lot 5 Block 3 Rearrangement of Radles Sunnyslope Addition (127 Birchwood Dr N) We the undersigned support the partial vacation of Sunset Drive Name Address Sign A n I_ /I 1‘11$67f a; �1 wad &i W /.. ` 13 2- c.,Q.w a.�.. f a - ' e"�iz di? -'' o U 404 �L�ir�-� �' .e �4 5 e. 4by$ �o , p4 . fizr#11M_ 2,26_,44,,iii .. /47 ,'% _ 2 ���J 212_ / J,1 v v( eple ` _ ate,,, '�(V� f,2 3 f� ��,.,..� 0 ►.►� z 7-211---- j.~rt� " ��� l Ri }ARRANGEMENT -OF~ RADEE 51 } 51/N,tk.5 .OPE ADDI7?ON rl.-.3 � iR j. 4 - $$P'FZ' Y 1/EJT 0/ BLOCA /ISO % - �5 r tlf..r„ i r, 9 6 "r•e, .Ws Sr 1 w4rCR M/NNLS6rds / • IwaewrtJ !war Seine / Lvre /Oo !der �Nf14l T s Annin.^A. J! .7 rower .Soiverow MYRTLE STREET sit to - 171^A. ► 1 bar by certify t hawing worry d the pr ➢e y d eeribed • thi plat • st-an.1myl>af 07 Mattllt I sum atOPm a3R10I WMMT 07 H10CL 10 1 and ha s plan d Irons at tha s roar • abovn nd so 1 • est Tee 1 no Iva t ground nor &or %totaled road • ease nt es r sem except • bovvaw / menu .7Y tAi C gtifieet Me 7�y Nlanos to Mat f Minneeet baat7 of ka hingto t 0a lid 5r4, day f Juno 1958 b f tha and r lga d p messily pp •r d Jam a 1 Ciao t a km so t k tee p doe 10 C Sa and woo cat a too f go lag 1n tram at asd aekea 1 dg d that ju ex at d tha sow hi f ant a*d d a. Qe�.....t Q nAe..w.o-h.. Notary Mlle a tangs* Cony, talon w asset i z rpl Del- J.r Ice/ solo is to e rt1f7 that goer? J Hall and C1ar* L Meg. bn bond and oil eve of the fell..tact all sr ladle • SawN Slop addttlos to th City of $illlvst r Mloa sots Wanyod sad platttd and now so fit and of roe a In the etflo of tha Mogl tzar f Titles Of Washington Cerny Minn ea that 11 v t of 31 ek D• One of said Mad1. Manny nape bait! a � vita COT�py71 ahilDITII1 formed O7 and p31 07 MOas1 a td bar tbbs City t Mt111v*1 Mter known tm- T Soots. top shows by thl plat and ha bf dsdteat to the public ern f r the oshli m fersrer all the St sot Pet n lanes Part and 7largreund • shove. Wlteets Our band and es1_3d_ day of t/ ✓w F�1�9955jg�'rI' 72,'6 tanPpint,°.__°_ f"na4LZ,t #. ti st•a et. Rnnosoa Co®1X b=,Taehlogt a 419L5T Y Mats of Minnesota Don y f W shingt City f Stillest r at • a ttcg f the Cty Camo11 f the City f Mtillvater day f 9j6 the plot hareem delt0eat d to sppre d nd as I her try 0 rtif7 tint ter f th lee 7 ,aid od tra .tar eater d this Noy r . E fill City C1 rk /937 es lead h r t Coma/ rre•ear W ehingt Corny Mi ay of 31 r Corny &altar a htagton Cerny M I ha yy try tot the tasty= t on tht ha t vats fl=d M lo th- dry A.D.1958 t 2e41et f Titles_ • • J • RA DL E S SUNNY SLOPE ADD/T/ON TO THE C/T v OF ST/L L ✓VA TER M/NNESOTA / a ,• - Nr / r 7Ci owe' Je.4 / NEX. /9S6 o%dieet1JPI7! /- Jecd9 4 . PION /Ion/ Scale / /00 1� d W MYR E -r r S r Li 4 Ly i vl --w— • • MEMO • • To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director �--- Subject Introductory Review of Phase II Development Proposal for 152 33 Acre Site Date May 3, 2000 Background The Comprehensive Plan (1995) and Orderly Annexation Agreement (1996) provides land use and timing or phasing direction for development of this vacant City expansion area The land use plan indicates the area under development for Phase II development meaning the area could develop as early as January 1999 or anytime thereafter The Phase I area and adjacent land took longer to develop then was expected The Orderly Annexation Agreement prescnbes the maximum number of new housing units permits that could be issued per year The number was set at 120 DU/year For 2000, a total of 600 permits could have been issued approximately 150 of the 600 permits have been issued to date This year will probably see the largest number of permits issued due to the availability of vacant developable lots Two maps are attached The first map shows the overall comprehensive plan expansion area and locates the Phase II expansion area under consideration The Phase II area is compnsed of 152 acres In the past, the area has been referred to as the Abromovich (126 acres) and Rivard (26 acres) Properties Land Use Plan - The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan shows the Phase II area m three residential land use distnct, single family large lot, 2 du/ac, single family small lot, 4 du/ac and townhouse residential, 6 du/ac The predominate land use for the area is single family small lot residential (109 acres) Single family large lot compnses of 26 acres and townhouse residential of 19 acres Wetlands and sloped areas are not calculated in the developable land acreage The following type and number of housing units results from the proposed land use map Land Use Map Acres Dwelling Units Single Family Large Lot 26 52 Single Family Small Lot 91 363 Townhouse Residential 16 94 Total 133 509 Du's 1 • • • Planning Commission Page 2 May 3, 2000 Parks and Open Space - A review of site conditions shows that of the total 152 33 acres, 18,98 acres is in wetland based on a recent wetland delineation No areas are in slopes greater than 24 percent (24%) A tree survey is being prepared to locate significant trees and to evaluate tree impacts The recently approved Tree Ordinance will be used to review the development It does not appear that tree removal will be an issue The area designated park (16 86 acres) contains a wood lot and woody npanan vegetation appears along Brown's Creek tnbutanes The City's shoreland regulations protect wetlands and stream areas requinng special setbacks and buffering These wetland protections are reflected in the site plan As a part of locating the Brown's Creek Natural Area (designated park preserve) a detailed natural resource inventory was conducted for the entire Phase II site A summary of the inventory is attached for Commission information The inventory was used to identify the Brown's Creek Natural Area and site area development Most of the areas shown for development are now crop fields or pasture Other Comprehensive Plan land use policies of special significance to development of the site include site access from both Boutwell and McKusick Road, greenways buffenng along County Road 15, special Brown's Creek tributary protection, acquisition of the Brown's Creek Nature Preserve, trail development within and through the site, park dedication of 10 percent (10%) of net developable land, 13 3 acres Other specific site planning issues relate to the proposed subdivision design and streetscape, relationship of house to street and open space amenities, garage location and site preparation (drainage, grading, infiltration) Proposed Development - The proposal is to develop 380 housing umts on the site Of that number, 221 units would be single family small lot units and 160 units would townhouse residential units This is below the Comprehensive Plan allowable maximum of 509 dwelling units The location and number of townhouse residences is different than the proposed land use map The land use plan allows 94 townhouse units while 160 are proposed The units are located at the corner of Boutwell and CR 15 rather than along McKusick Road This change requires a Comprehensive Plan amendment as a part of the planning development review The proposal shows 47 73 acres of land in parks and open space Of that number, 16 86 acres is designated parks preserve (Brown's Creek Natural Area), 6 62 acres neighborhood park and 24 25 acres pnvate open space (wetlands, setbacks and buffers) The issue of parks and open space will have to be discussed further, 13 3 acres of park space is required The plan shows sidewalks and trials paralleling through roads and along some natural areas More consideration of trail location is needed based on the Expansion Area Parks and Greenways Plan by the Parks Board and Planning Commission before final review • • • Planning Commission Page 3 May 3, 2000 For this Planning Commission presentation, the Stillwater Township Planning Commission and Town Board have been notified and invited to attend the Planning Commission meeting At the Joint Board meeting of Apnl 18, 2000, the following schedule for review of Phase II development was approved Apnl 18 - Joint Board determination of necessary project review elements and schedule May 8 - City Planning Commission initial review of project June 12 - City Planning Commission public hearing review necessary Comprehensive Plan amendments, rezomng, planned unit development and subdivision review (public heanngs) June 15 - Stillwater Township Planning Commission review project June 22 - Stillwater Town Board reviews project July 6 - Joint Board holds public heanng(s) and reviews project July 18 - City Council holds public hearings for project approval (Comprehensive Plan, rezoning, preliminary plat, concept PUD9) On June 12th a Planning Commission public heanng will be held to review the development plans The planning reviews required include Comprehensive Plan amendment, zoning amendment, PUD and Preliminary Plat Recommendation At this meeting, Commission members should make sure they understand the project and ask questions regarding Comprehensive Plan Policy and project design No action will be taken Attachments Project plans, Natural Resource Inventory, Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan 1 h Ise I 1996 RR \ JI RR R RR Phase IV" 2015 [/� ( LL s- `IPtOpwed L toil Use (OW p `M ! � - RR - Rcsldentl d I S17 L Smgle'amity Luce 1 nt __ ��!/ — �� 1 net t c.... r...,. l. Small Lot F�/��_ _ / (JLL I«7 Phtsel u f �~ iN 1996 P9� //i4 SFLL — 6f SL Commercial rd) , �� SFLL . C\ \ ghborhood Comm rt 1 v l . I _— --_-- I CC L.o nm it) Co nm r al su — l 1 — Business P irk JJ SFLL ) f I3PC B sinew Park Comma al t r -�\ I �" 1 �- ,L�, t✓ st'i.� 13P0 Bus ncss Part. OtIce __„, \ r r 3 \O Adm=train- 011t e RR SFLL SFLL -- -SFLL P SFLI I SFSL L L SFLL Ir\ \ i ;Pie Ph ist, 1 LLL ,_ \ srJa siu ri SFL �Cltti Limits — — -- — SFLL I SFLL Institutional SFL ►a \sl - SFLL 12221 \IT ,_ _— _1 SFLL / --:—)M SS Secondary S hool 1 SELL, SFLL SFLL I I I �1I lI Alt J L �\L% > SFLL }�- �iy` CC sFu SFLL ` t I IT f • II � A SF LL SFLL/ ISF ern \Lu hal Sing! Famih \I IL 1 amity I3PI Busm -s Park Industrial RDP Res arch & Des lopmcnt Para. LS Clem nary S hoot CF_3.1 Cem tar) Public - P\I briria EMS P\ \eighborhood Part. PC Community Park PrTi PG Coif Course \\ater i. elland Area E OPS Open Space - RAIL Railroad C RO\\ Right-of\la) * As in e\Leptton to tilt Phastnl; S..hedulL du. Ca\ may anne\ prey ert\ riot des.nbud in Phases 111 or III br RLsoluttou it thi. propt.r- u ad)aLLnt to the Ctt\ tS p(tittonLd tor by onehundrLd pert.ent (101 of the property owners witlun the area to be anne\ed and 11 th . resulting atint\atton will not create a IL\t1 of growth that e\ct.eds t- onL hwidrotl twenty (120) d\\elling units per rear limitation SFLL Mater COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Proposed Land UsF Act es Pcice- 1 2 6 37 2r c- 71749 Is i= 75 41 0 6465 1 - 13 71 0 4109 141 66 23 95 45 61 118 1 _ 2807 41 96 0 5190 1 877 03- 1400 0_ 9359 2.- 2882 0= 301 15 6 fr 610 8 1 6032 101 41 2. 29 71 0 705.40 13 TOTAL Section Lines City Limits 4,599 25 100 00 Railroad N Streams Iamik- ease— 1 I i ,) I • Phase III 2002 Phase IV 2015 .0.4ITIF-1 wir L AK { { ej t i'� ri ae — 4. ? • 1 6 1 1 1 1 i 1 f 1 Report for Natural Resources Inventory Phase II Annexation Area Stiliwater, Minnesota July, 1999 File No. 510-98-802 AEABonestroo Rosene vil Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects 1=231itilE31 ,,,so-.% 0 1000 Feet Key 1 Prairie 2 Wetlands sedge meadow wet prairie and shrub carr 3 Old field 4 Woodland 5 Old fields 6 Woodland .141'7= i•Z' .;.. City of Stillwater Natural Resource Inventory -*:"477:1:%12A2 '"•-• jji Elonestroo Rosene ECCI 1-41 Anderltic & Associates Engin s & Architects k n !NI i n 1p 1 1 • Community #1 Type Old Field Acres Grammoids Bromus inermts Poa pratensis Andropogon gerardi Andropogron scopanus Panicum virgatum Carex sp Forbs Monarda fistula Scrophulana lanceolata Euphorbia corollata Oenothera bienms Solidago canadensis Artemesia absmthium Achillea millefohum Anemone canadensis Solidago nemoralis Verbena hastata Potentilla arguta Fragana 1, irginiana Sisymbnum altissimum Ascelpias synaca Rudbeckia serotina Trees/shrubs Populus tremuloides Salix sp Rubus occidental's Ecological Rank N/A Smooth brome Kentucky bluegrass Big bluestem Little bluestem Switch grass Sedges Bergamot Figwort Flowering spurge Evening primrose Canada goldenrod Common wormwood Yarrow Canada anemone Gray goldenrod Blue vervain Prairie cinquefoil Wild strawberry Tumble mustard Common milkweed Black-eyed susan Quaking aspen Willow Black raspberry C C o O O C C C C C C O O o O O O O C C C Descnption Small old field adjacent to railroad tracks Includes patches of prairie grasses and forbs in a matnx dominated by smooth brome and Canada goldenrod Shrubs and small trees are invading from the north and west Tlus old field is of higher quality than other old fields on the site, with a higher proportion and diversity of native species It is adjacent to diverse wetland communities (emergent marsh, sedge/wet meadow, and shrub communities) and to Browns Creek, and adds some upland habitat to this complex It is adjacent to a comdor of praine grasses along the Zephr railroad track Disturbance Indicators The old field was probably grazed m the past, which is suggested by the dominance of the brome, bluegrass and goldenrod, and relatively low diversity of native species Occasional fires sparked by trains have helped to keep a larger proportion of prairie Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 13 1 • • grasses close to the railroad tracks With a cessation of bums and cutting, small trees and shrubs are beginning to mvade the old field from the adjacent wooded wetland areas Management Recommendations A regime of controlled bums, including spring and fall bums, is recommended Interseeding may be added to increase the diversity when results of several burns have been analyzed Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area Community #2 Wetland Complex — Browns Creek Tributaries Community Types Wet Meadow, Acres Sedge Meadow, Willow Swamp, and Shrub Carr Rank B and C The wetland communities along the tnbutanes are highly interspersed This inventory considers the communities as a single ecological unit based on the high degree of interspersion and functional unity Trees/Shrubs Corpus stolonifera C sencea C foemina Salm rugra Alnus rugosa Spirea alba Acer negundo Acer sacchannum (small) Viburnum lentango Sambucus canadensis Prunus amencana Rubus occidental's Rhamnus cathartica Robinia pseudo -acacia Grasses Phalans arundinacea Scirpus cypennus Scirpus validus Typha latifolia Andropogon gerardi Schizachynum scopanum Carex stncta Carex sp Poa pratensis P compressa 1 Forbs Onoclea sensibihs Thelyptens thelypteroides Thalictrum dasycarpum Solidago canadensis Comandra unbellata Fragana virgimana Bidens frondosa Heuchera nchardsom Veronicastrum virginicum Geum aleopicum Red -twig dogwood Grey dogwood Stiff dogwood Black willow Speckled alder Meadowsweet Box elder Silver maple Nannyberry Elderberry Wild plum Black raspberry Buckthorn Black locust Reed canary grass Wood grass Soft -stem bulrush Cattail Big bluestem Little bluestem Tussock sedge Sedges Kentucky bluegrass Canada bluegrass Sensitive fern Marsh fern Purple meadow -rue Canada goldenrod Bastard toadflax Strawberry Beggar -ticks Alumroot Culversroot Yellow avens C C C c C C O O C C O O O O C C O C O O C C C C C C C C C C C O O C Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 15 Equisetum sp Anemone canadensis Hypencum pyramidatum Monarda fistula Helianthus tuberosus Lathyrus palustns Asclepias synaca Asclepias incarnata Urtica dioica Solanum dulcamara Verbena hastata Descnption Horsetails Canada anemone Great St Johns wort Bee -balm, monarda Jerusalem artichoke Vetchhng Common milkweed Swamp milkweed Stinging nettle Bittersweet nightshade Blue vervain The wetlands along the Browns Creek tnbutanes are a relatively wide complex of sedge meadow, wet meadow and shrub carr communities, including willow swamp and alder thickets In some areas the communities have been invaded by reed canary grass and the diversity reduced, but in many areas the quality is high Even in late October in a dry fall, there is significant flow in the tnbutanes, suggesting the presence of spnngs One such "spnng" area may be located just to the west of Old Field 5, near a patch of willows and cattails On October 23, the stream just downstream from this point had a noticeable mass of suds and a small oil slick Is there a problem septic system in the area9 The southerly tnbutary is about one foot wide and 8 inches deep at the point just south of Woodland 6 It has a strong flow at this point and defined channel Disturbance Indicators Some areas of the wetlands adjacent to the old fields have been grazed, and invaded by reed canary grass Cessation of burns in the area is allowing buckthorn and locust shrubs to gain footholds in the wetlands near woodlands Management Recommendations Management recommendations include burning these areas to control exotics, protecting them with wetland buffers and nummizing disturbance If a trail system is built along the tnbutanes, it should be built on one side only to leave some undisturbed habitat for birds and other animals Every effort should be made to keep these comdors intact as the area develops to allow for wildhfe movement along the tnbutanes and to protect the water quality of the tnbutanes Trees, shrubs, and tall grass areas should be maintained to cool the water in the tnbutanes that flow to Brown's Creek Regular water temperature momtonng on the tnbutanes that was established in 1997 should be continued Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 I 1 • 1 Community #2A Type Wet Meadow with Acres Tamaracks Trees Lanx lancma Betula papynfera Salix mgra Shrubs Cornus stolomfera Alnus incana ssp rugosa Prunus amencana Rubus sp Lonicera sp Rhamnus cathartica Ground Carex sp Poa palustns Scirpus cypennus Calamagrostis canadensis Scirpus validus Solidago Achillea millefolium Gentiana andrewsii Eupatonum perfoliatum Eupatonum maculatum Aster nova-angliae Helianthus grosseratus Lobelia siphilrtica Coreopsis lanceolata Potentilla recta Ranunculus acns Rudbeckia hu-ta Lespedeza capitata Lycopus amencanus Sagittana lahfoha Impatiens capensis Onoclea sensibilis Fragana virgmiana Thalictnun dasycarpum Galium boreale Anemone canadensis Polygonum sp Zizia aurea Tamarack Paper birch Black willow Red -osier dogwood Speckled alder Wild plum Raspberry Honeysuckle Buckthorn Sedges Fowl meadow grass Wool grass Canada bluejoint Soft stem bulrush Rank C O O C C C O C O C C C C O Yarrow 0 Closed gentian R Boneset 0 Joe-pye weed 0 New England Aster 0 Sunflower 0 Great blue lobeha 0 Lance -leaf coreopsis 0 Sulfur cinquefoil 0 Tall buttercup 0 Black-eyed susan 0 Round -headed Bush clover 0 Bugleweed 0 Arrowhead 0 Jewelweed C Sensitive fern 0 Strawberry 0 Purple meadow -rue 0 Northern bedstraw C Canada anemone 0 Smartweeds C Golden alexanders 0 Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area • Community Description Small "island" of tamaracks at bend in tributary, with an understory community of wet prairie The area is adjacent to shrub fringe along tributary and Diet meadow Heavy invasion by buckthorn and reed canary grass, but tamaracks are interesting and unique Old beaver dam nearby may have helped to create hydrology that supports this community Disturbance Indicators Low diversity and community dominants suggest that the area was grazed in the past Reed canary grass dominates the wet meadow community, and buckthorn is invading among the trees and shrubs Management Recommendations Fall burns that are hot enough to attack the roots may help to control the reed canary grass Will require a fire break or other protection for tamaracks Several years of burns may help sedges and other ratives to return Area could also be interseeded The tamaracks are unique (may have been planted), and may therefore have a higher local pnonty for protection than the wet meadow community alone Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 18 Communities #3 Community Type Old Field Trees/Shrubs Grammoids Forbs Acres Quercus macrocarpa Rhamnus cathartica Cornus sencea Populus tremuloides Corylus amencana Bromus inermis Poa pratensis Andropogon gerardi Andropogon scopanus Setana glauca Phalans arundinacea Solidago canadensis Achillea millefolium Ascelpias synaca Centauea maculosa Coreopsis lanceolata Potentialla recta Ranunculus acns Rudbeckia hirta Lespedeza capitata Thalictrum polygamum Helianthus divancatus Euphorbia corollata Teucnum canadense Hieracium canadense Aster encoides Verbascum thapsus Ambrosia artimisiifoha Cirsium discolor Vitis npana Artemesia absinthium Helianthus divancatus Physahs virgimana Potentilla simplex Fragana virguuana Rose arkansa Rank N/A Bur oak Buckthorn Red -osier dogwood Quaking aspen Hazel Smooth brome Kentucky bluegrass Big bluestem Little bluestem Foxtail Reed canary grass Canada goldenrod Yarrow Common milkweed Spotted knapweed Tall coreopsis Sulphur cinquefoil Tall buttercup Black-eyed susan Round -headed bush clover Tall meadow rue Woodland sunflower Flowenng spurge Amencan germander Canada hawkweed Heath aster Mullein Common ragweed Field thistle Wild grape Common wormwood Woodland sunflower Ground cherry Cinquefoil Wild Strawberry Praine wild rose O O O O O C C O O C O Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 19 • Description Old field dominated by smooth brome and Canada goldenrod A bum regime may bnng back some diversity, or overseedmg could be used to increase diversity over many years A higher diversity of prairie grasses (mcluding Big bluestem, Little bluestem, Switch grass, and Cordgrass) remain along the railroad tracks at the north end of the field The old field grades to shrub communities along the east and south near the Browns Creek tnbutanes The two old field areas are nearly identical m species mix Highest quality at north end near railroad tracks and along tnbutary corridor An interesting community at the southeast end at the bend in the tnbutary includes Tamaracks Tamarack area includes the following species Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 20 Commumty #4 Community Type Woodlot Canopy Shrubs Ground Acres Acer sacchannum Acer saccharum Ulmus rubra Robinia pseudoacacia Populus nigra Malus sp Quercus macrocarpa (1) Quercus alba Sambucus canadensis Rhamnus cathartica Rubus sp Lonicera sp Carya cordiformis Glechoma hederacea Malva neglecta Arctium minus Stellana media Bidens frondosa Bohemena cyhndnca Geum aleppicum Athynum fihx-femma Anemonella thahctroides Rank N/A Silver maple Sugar maple Red maple Black locust Lombardy poplar Apples Bur oak White oak Common elderberry Buckthorn Raspberry Honeysuckle Bitternut hickory R 0 C C C O O Ground ivy C Mallow C Burdock C Common chickweed C Sticktights C False nettle Yellow avens Lady fern Rue anemone Natural Resources Inventory — Phase I1 Annexation Area 21 • Description Open woodland with canopy of large Silver Maple and some Sugar Maple Silver maple canopy trees over 100 feet, and some greater than 36" dbh Silver maple were planted on a grid Sugar maple and elm are smaller One large Bur Oak at southeast edge has dbh approximately 30" Northern end of woodland is higher quality —more open, and less invasion by buckthorn Southern and western edges have large clones of black locust and larger buckthorn, plus lombardy popular, honeysuckle, and other exotics Birds present include chickadees, woodpeckers, and vireos (late October) Disturbance Indicators The plant community is not a natural one, but appears to have been planted, perhaps has a farm woodlot The ruins of small farm buildings remain on the southern edge of the woodlot, as well as pieces of farm equipment The southern and western edges have large clones of black locust and buckthorn Several other exotic shrubs are part of the subcanopy in these areas The northern part of the woodland is more open, and has a higher diversity of native plants in the canopy, subcanopy, and ground layer Management Recommendations The Woodlot could be improved by removal of buckthorn, locust and popular, and controlled burns to suppress these and other non -natives in the understory The Woodlot provides good habitat diversity in combination with adjacent oldfield and wetland communities along the tnbutanes The woodlot could be managed to achieve a more natural woodland structure and plant diversity, or it could be managed to recall its histoncal use Woodland is interesting because (1) lustoncal associations with agncultural use of the area, (2) the major trees are native and would have been typical of floodplain forest communities in this area, (3) the woodlot provides habitat diversity within the whole natural areas complex along Browns Creek Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 22 Community #5 Community Type Old Field (#5) Grammoids Forbs Shrubs Description Acres Bromus inermis Andropogon gerardi Andropogon scopanus Setana glauca Phalans arundmacea Poa pratensis Sohdago canadensis Achillea millefolium Ascelpias synaca Centauea maculosa Aster encoides Verbascum thapsus Ambrosia artimisiifoha Cirsium discolor Potent'lla simplex Quercus macrocarpa Rhamnus cathartica Cornus sencea Populus tremuloides Ulmus rubra Ulmus chinensis Rank N/A Smooth brome Big bluestem Little bluestem Foxtail Reed canary grass Kentucky bluegrass Canada goldenrod Yarrrow Common milkweed Spotted knapweed Heath aster Mullein Common ragweed Field thistle Cinquefoil Bur oak Buckthom Red -osier dogwood Quaking aspen Red elm Sibenan elm C C C C O O C C O Species list is nearly identical to Old Field #3 and condition is similar Old field is dominated by smooth brome and Canada goldenrod Locust, maples, and chmese elm are invading from east adjacent to woodland Juruperus virginiana are also occasional on this old field Area grades into sedge meadow and shrub wetland along west and south ends near tnbutanes to Browns Creek South of the tnbutary, the old field is much the same, though no areas of native grasses are evident Old field has many deer paths and beds Highest diversity and native species is at the north end near railroad tracks, and at south and west near tributaries Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 23 • Disturbance Indicators Like other old fields in the study area, this area may have been tall -grass praine onginally Grazing and planting have reduced species diversity and favored aggressive species such as smooth brome and Canada goldenrod With the cessation of regular fires that helped to maintain the open praine and its plants, woodland plants such as buckthorn, Chinese elm, locust and jumpers are now invading the area Management Recommendations Management recommendations include development of bum regime including spnng and fall bums, and overseedmg with native tall grass praine species, or tall/mid grass species on dner south -facing slopes Cut out locust, buckthorn, and other larger trees and shrubs before burn Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 24 • i Communities # 6 and 8 Community Type Acres Farm woodlots Canopy Acer sacchannum Populus deltoides Ulmus rubra U arnencana Pmus strobus (1) Quercus macrocarpa Prunus amencana Shrubs Cornusracemosa Acer guinala Rhamnus cathartica Descnption Rank Silver maple Cottonwood Red (slippery) elm American elm White pine Bur oaks Wild plum Gray dogwood Amur maple Buckthorn C 0 0 C C C C C These are small farm woodlots with limited species diversity Some areas are low and damp, and dominated by silver maple and cottonwood Drier areas close to Boutwell Road have bur oaks and plums Disturbance Indicators Buckthorn invasion is heavy in these areas, and there is little diversity in the understory With their small size and limited diversity, the areas have limited habitat value Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 25 Community #7 Community Type Mixed Hardwood Swamp and Sedge Meadow Canopy Populus deltoides P tremuloides Ulmus chinensis Ulmus rubra Acer negundo Salix nigra Alnus rugosa Shrubs Cornus stolomfera Rhamnus cathartica Lonicera sp Sambucus canadensis Ground Onoclea sensibilis Scirpus cypennus Carex stncta Phalans arundmacea Bromus inermis Poa pratensis Solidago canadensis Plantago major Rumex cnspus Solanum dulcamara Vitis npana Descnption Acres Cottonwood Quaking aspen Sibenan elm Red (slippery) elm Boxelder Black willow Speckled alder Red -osier dogwood Buckthorn Honeysuckle Common elder Sensitive fern Wool grass Tussock sedge Reed canary grass Smooth brome Kentucky bluegrass Canada goldenrod Plantain Curly dock Bitter nightshade Wild grape Rank BC C C C C C C O C C C C C C C C C C C O O O O This is a complex of shrub, forested, and sedge meadow wetland in the middle of a corn field A small creek flows through the area, with a central depression m the woods with a few inches of standing water As the creek flows from the wetland to the east, the vegetation resembles that of the other Brown's Creek tributaries Large numbers of deer tracks noted in the wetland and in the cornfields surrounding it Disturbance Indicators The area is heavily invaded by buckthorn and reed canary grass It is isolated from other wetlands m the area by the surroundmg cornfield Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 26 I t • • Management Recommendations Removal of the buckthorn and regular burns to control the reed canary grass are recommended to improve the quality of the wetland Connections to Brown's Creek tributaries should be maintained if the wetland is to function for wildlife habitat as it does now Natural Resources Inventory — Phase II Annexation Area 27 COUNTY ROAD NO. -611 (McKUSICK RO-AD NORTH) CURVE TABLE Legend: Total Number of Units Total Number of Townhame Units Total Number of Lots Minhmun Lot Size Average Lot Size GROSS ACREAGE LESS: WETLANDS 7,000 s.f. 10,394 s.f. STEEP SLOPES NET AREA PARKS / OPEN AREAS: Preserve Park Active Park Private Open Space Total Park / Open Areas 381 160 221 152.33 Acres 18.98 Acres 0.00 Acres 133.35 16.86 Acres 6.62 Acres 24.25 Acres 47.73 Acres n I _...41i7MMEM 4*.V.IMIKVOMMIM -..Allnii• In.' ..aLlAIALA- -..6M11/101i47." .4.11‘01151., 4N/N=Mir*MLAWN \ ,REINifoi, MIN=M.IM ./Wak2M-4r0F/Ne •IN/4//1/11// IM A. .ANILLIAMIN Ilk *WNW MN. ....iNNIMMNIMININUNNUMILM 'MNIIIIIMNIkillik NM ...42._ .NNIIMIIIIIMII =01111M/1111•114111M6, `‘Mi.-41111•41101•16. Nliik ...1=4.7. , \ BEM gilltZ4V ''' -d/1110AMIIPMWIIIIIIIIIMI worwommeicrAisaammumemrr • -4111.w- Vr/PAY011~S.SSI.1111-4/ial 'aWit=4.1K1400.i, 11111.1." Wit4AMEMIIMMVIONIMMIMIllr' MitMLIMMIIIMilallr. fOr..*Tee,41411 IWYJAMIIMMMIW IMMINSMNIMM44-11//tefirJER11171=1411141M1=1;204/4Pflie7.141., IIIIIMINNI.Iii211611G:PYT411.'4.1111114-41411111111{/I111747/ MIIIMINWIMIIIIMINIM.1,1W.....~..141rAINIMIIIIIIII4W/111/111KM/ , 1111MO111411.81111M1. I +OM III 1P4P.IN! MIS Mit.,..R LW- .....1111MOWUDAIIRr ' V.: 41111=111111141.110111.M I 1144 If Ts I 4 l• MEP WWI '; l41/ S..P.IPS.SIMILIII Fr , .........._ .......... - ,.,..,eW WICON=MitifkILW/A11=1IMM 4 ...le.zikaar - `43.1111MM..:-.41=44111MMIMMW4..` '- iM////1•1/ -^44•14.1111111.--,.. 144MMIIIIIMMIMMIllh." -.4., `104/4=MW.EKIVI/l4, --.0 ..714//1/4.-'IMINIMINIIIIMN WV ..41•11...\111111 ,41•.- ,1,41Metr- 4111,== W ...Q.11.11bw.'...11,AVNOIJAINNICL.W.WAQ,:edr, 4k.Sfit,t.';.- 1' -70110111764.-'71 ....4t4t/4ti ITAMIM501/Ria,1"..Viiliiii6W//41.'" lir 44 1110,41411WW" --.4414.44241414.1.1111P'" 441114' SIM \ biro& INN= Ik J01111=111 4IMIIIIMAlik MINIMMININk. .101=11=1:11111 MINIIIIMMIIMMillemomman rirl:=MillEAMM 111.11.1".."6.--.!'"iiIII104. 'AMIIIIILIMMIIIIIII=111///!r„Ar-.-... =NW ■//,'7. .-.' ,M I 41.Mil MI, 1=Ir" ....-WAI=11111113111Mlie_ ammilinglialmarram!, ,rI LI WV MI _WI .W.M11'!.. MIN IIIIIP/=4/.11r.......•444%k.. 4 ,...114 QIE MI Ini MI IV NMI MINOIMIMILIIIM la Irf4.7-rMEINC, .1 4 4 ;• 4 4 immorimaissomonwirm. n:;?: 'I' , * 4 =7Z.= ........... Af'74' Pi .......... -miniammagOliiiiiiit SWAMI "''''Illiiii."0'.4.7•11WA,ONIMWALNo...4... .., 757 SZ *••;t7Alttelatatir ANINNLAALLs.e.....e.411•Eisei7.7.- ASO ALUMNI-. .W AI IN 411111M-ILLIND *PLMLNIP • • AiNAIMM111.1 Al=1111111; Mt.*" "* menursimsta 114 11 AININIMI'AMMAMMUIPMMl MIN I NINON I.L.111•1 INGO AL •±7.111INIMIN IIMICarak141•1114•115111MIIIIIMIIIMMNIIMOW *114141114IIIIMMWMIPARMINIIIRIEWAT0111 Jetrolt11.4 M. 4/1/11111/NOMMISNIWIMI1111-114AMIlillM1111111.114M. afillM44aRFAIIIIIIWBNIMMVERM101/2 4/N1454/-444EMAR1,72///WILIFIKUIS 41/091441•4¢41.:1LIIIININEWAPIIG-1.14-., Vhf.. womisawkwwitiscrotaa 111•11MANW3TALIVUI•XL••=. 11.1....--"•••1111111MMINM1111/..., *IIMILVILV/14522MIIIA ft ,4f1 -"%11111..a.,INNI./.1111111I 41LINVAVIMa 11WENLINLWIILIAL 1444r*ALW1114•41/filZ WM& .111MMMININMINGIMMIIINIMMS d11/- AMINE 4111MOIL.441114.401W-11141111. /==lif/111MIL.41111MINIIIIFAMMIIIIIVA.4, MEI §s, :141. No L58.4 7' 223.02' 147.70' BOUTIATLIN ROAD -..41argramo- -414.11111%-...71,4111101.....- _.1144,..444.Z".03.01P.i,d.W.411, 1.,44'1/43SIniONM1-4AIM1:44.7.411111111111 ...ii71-ranr".2MAITALVAIIIMII. -..;--,,,C iVklir`...MIIIMUWANNiarkiATR,...1151MPIIKIIIIIMIlit..- ,d1M=1617"-iitIliONS:11117"...if IVAINIIIIII....- vf W"--ailMIIIMIIIPAI7A1MilOMV?Mii -Ali,M11.10,111,411111=11W2MIAIL:VM! ...011111W-VIIIIVANIIIWW14Jr*MMMILMAIIHISIONI - ,,4•'..,MMO/IMMAII/1111.1. -.....11iNIIIMill11.4.11INIIIIIII{MY -,..g11111111111IIINNIIIIIIIIIIIIII2 `1442W.911i. _....1FAIMMIIIIIigIA14:4.44i43111MEMINIIrl/WININir* ..0.44biS.1.4414.- :-...1111M11:414114111.14111141/Antili=e1MV*7-ili ....'.411it,I1f3littlIW:11011=1147fr.F.--'144141411%1NY_INIIIME _.-..141111111!2t::i,„r..,.,- ---aggra,:', 74:',/, \ N141FMNIIIIMOINIIIMMAIEV,MMUIMINI ..SPAIIIIIMIIG.,... . .7... MI,_WW4,..W_TM*7.:', .5.5i4,'.;k41471111IIIIIMIWANIMP Aiill.W' "A'IIIIP"',7,A"4•111L . MUNI AIniA MANN •••.----allein" AgliiIIIIM6'=',. ..glIrieillIrrnZ ' Lmaiir -./..MB/Pi•L /MI 1!!RRIii .RAJELIPMW=DWagiAIMMEr r 1 * ffjW. 2ilIf M wrml. == ..4101111. ARMIN IL _....40MU./...4.41,', IfiirAlrii,.4. 1 AIIPR .S.VMMIGNMIN .- :"...-.'11111P• -OW AINIZTA=1111 7 npra,m4." lalePL'- . o AniM.711 i, . ..7•-.1klik alEllb. r /1111111111•111111,/kilii40111111441 '40101/61~611111•11111IMMINNIIINIII `11:404/M1WEIMINIU 444it, 411.7411412110.4.,'Y, '4.11111E1;..4S4W1., III•041Z:71J= IIINIMIMMLit.W.:1441101P1MIIIR /0/1.7•Sena:431Mt 111111L 111111iMMIMOMN*1 1111•111111•1111 IM111011117111MI •••11■111111MFAMONIIIIIIIIM 111.2 MIME \111111111 WMMINIL AMIN MOM `MML ONIIIMME VIM1MI 11 1- MINIKUIMA I • • SM_ imamc 4 ,fflmommC NMUINIL IMMINNIk INNE Min MINK HAM \IIIMM.1M1111. 11•14111IMUI MWMNIIMEL 11.1•1111111MOIMI 1PRIVIAINIMIIIM=0111 `51WARMNI1111111. VM94•MIIIIMMEMOMINOMIL VMMIft.."411111.. ,.‘AbinNUNINIMNIMI6-1•1111111aML 1 h.\ I I I I I I I • 6.7 .7 I I\ IN I I I I I \'..NIMMNOMMI..NE I I I I h, • I .1=1111MINIlk. IMINIMIk,IMINI 1.11 11NOMINIMMON1111111WIN67/ ••.111111M01=111iWENIMI ft..M•MO I 7. • • I I I • I LW 1111 0110111W- -•••1=0MOIWNNIM7 11.711111. 0!4/4.-11MMIL • I! • ..\INNIIMINIINNI WWWIMM -.4•Ir_1•41h.\ NIMMMMIUMM Radius 1 270.00' 2 250.00' 3 400.00' 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 400.00' 180.00' 500.00' 180.00' 200.00' 290.00' 260.00' 150.00' 150.00' 400.00' 60.00' 50.00' 60.00' 30.00' 60.00' 290,00' 260.00' 320.00' 350.00' 250.00' 30.00' 30.00' 60.00' 80.00' 90.00' 250.00' 60.00' 60.00' 90.00' 40.00' 60.00' 60.00' 250,00' 150,00' 90.00' 200.00' 200.00' 175.00' 120.00' 120.00' 200.00' 250.00' 240.00' 240.00' 200.00' 600.00' 110.00' 400.00' 50.00' 21 00' 250. ' 205.00' 320.00' 0.00' 00' 350. 170.00' 170.00' 400.0 150.0 150,01' 0 . 6 50. 6 OG.0 1' 71 \72 \\ 40r! 75 509 00' 1)01 8 8 1t701:0; 7 7 Delta 62°0356" 56°45'27" 52°34'39" 44°18'57" 52°13'15" 76°14'20" 24°32'38" 45°30' 16" 10°03'51" 17°02'25" 11°02' 01" 57°07' 14" 14°46' 18" 27°57'02" 38°12' 02" 11°55' 15" 85°00'00" 47°55'34" 06°36'59" 08°36' 10" 59°24'47" 50°00'45" 39°44' 06" 92°53'18" 66°07' 13" 17°55' 11" 28°54' 55" 13°35'22" 44°00'45" 02°14' 12" 38°28' 12" 30°00'00" 39°25' 13" 15°09'04" 37°11'01" 10°37'43" 11°13' 48" 22°59'23" 12°07'57" 06°58'28" 14°14'52" 23°12' 13" 23°14' 18" 14°16'59" 06°42'59" 14°16'50" 13°37'41" 00°40'03" 11°03'46" 105°31'29" 18°00'38" 73°28'21" 51°44'23" 54°15'54" 21°37'42" 1°14'27" 76 '03" 30°04 " 06°47'29 76°03'45" 3140" 2 '56" 42°22' 86°20' 156 122°05' 357 00°24' •..10' 49" 8" 17°36'05" 26°53 37' 13°12 4S' 24'55'46" 2649'06" 8°38'34' t4M-040:01W W. 4 FI .4.ISWR .i01111, -1.'41•1•.--... , "OUNIMIN4241WZMW,.,-*17.51LVECP. ,IIM•IMMINIIII W.WMMWWWWM .."41ONIM...IMIIIIIIIIIIIIIM "l4L!Va•flOMBIMMEMILW: '''INIMIM4-,1=11NIMMIIIIIIW . _ '"Vh:4/1"iii•AMIWISI . ..1411MMIii...\ MONIIIIMMI..11Ift. M WEMMMMSMMMIMM WMMIMIN 4UNNI.--\ MOIMM./L \ MMIN.._'..MIO1111.-'1Ofl 'MM=4.WVIED!flifIMEI 111•11.--"IMINIMIL 4NNIIM.,&417:Mi -.... ^4.414MINNOMM ,Vel.14WIFA .... ' "...CM MI,',1111=11M1 ""..4.2Eir../i .....ilEM11114. '4•ZINEbb.`MIr-4416. w. 111N/N/0.- 11 \ IMINNAh...... Length 292.48' 247.65' 387.06' 309.38' 104.06' 665.31' 77.11' 158.84' 50.94' 77.33' 28.89' 149.54' 103.13' 29.27' 33.34' 12.48' 44,51' 50.19' 33.49' 39.04' 331.83' 305.51' 173.38' 48.64' 34.62' 18.77' 40.37' 21.35' 192.04' 2.34' 40.29' 47,12' 27.52' 15.87' 38.94' 46.38' 29.40' 36. 11' 42.35' 24.35' 43.52' 48.60' 48.67' 49.86' 29.31' 59.82' 57.08' 2.33' 115.85' 202.59' 125.74' 320.58' 225.76' 236.78' 77.38' 230.33' 335.47' 131.25' 41.49' 5.68' Chord 278.39' 237.65' 354.32' 301.73' 158.44' 617,30' 76.52' 154.70' 50.87' 77.04' 28.84' 143.43' 102.84' 28.98' 32.72' 12.46' 40.54' 48.74' 33.47' 39.00' 317. 16' 295.90' 169.92' 43.48' 32.73' 18.69' 39.95' 21 .30' 187.35' 2.34' 39.53' 46.59' 26.98' 15.82' 38.26' 46.31' 29.35' 35.87' 42.27' 24.33' 43.40' 48.27' 48.34' 49.73' 29.29' 59.66' 56.95' 2.33' 115.67' 175.15' 125.22' 299.07' 218.16' 228.03' 76.93' 225.39' 310.86' 129.75' 41.46' 209.47' 78.01' 153.55' 6.34' 2 31.79' 4' 44.27' .07' 10.05' 90' 295.43' 97: ' 97.0 23 38' , 22.8 245 76' 21 0' 117.:•5' 116 27 6\7' 27 52.21' 51 18. 0'1,5.08' ,a491111111MEWIE -aCJIMEMOMIF :ki.VMS'S"'", .e.aftligh. .,.." ..61,11(14MIIIV/WW. •I- :19.1111MINOINIIV6.11...W16.Malfalilh. \IIII.Nliit.f.r103171411111111111.41 41Mt7-'1■MMEI Pro- AINSWMIVIRMIW MN ••'--..•• 4 /5 .11M1711111111.1111%.-27117/rms~TIF iiraleCKIW-4,1i/3 41=01111, AVM /7.4111•111.7r - IMININMIIIIIIII IMILINIMWANIIIVALLULANT2*--.M.F.W2ePOLINMIN • - AIIIIIIIII..- • I I I IFAMIMILAWMAINLMWMNINEFAIIMI '41.11,411.4111\1//11111411 At:MO/ ANENIIIMINI.1 ANUMMIII ANIS= AMMIWAIIIIIII= 14!: illai - lt AllillilLMMIWI"PrI NM a WM.:1n MK • 9 WWMil IVIRWtaridraimr, &9 .' ----v24611CP-MAIWiilifiklMMIINVIA/1 -...nwrAir,,,A, 4Atm... .W. W. WIMMNI MAIIrr4"7.1ri'llMril7r# dill W JAW 'NO or WiNrikwumilp:.ar, ii..MMMIIIII AIWA/ ..itt W.' 12V 11We 'irafit -7, Air ,INNOMME .4M/IMNON/ _ 1 4=11MIIIMPINWAIrAilah.7.GiaS.:1 NIL NOW01 7.:../MAIN /1171M111/16.. ;;,=.11; ANIIMINIIII-L.:..W......0.,' ==//7/1/N/2=111MIZ •17/////ifialiflata. -- VP:...o..7. '..,_ -adlIMMNIP! Atsassoimaatrmssimmemoneln% migr Iss -....--,......, ,..-- •iiATA, -..mmilieumwe• W.WdLIN UBM ALk ANEW ifIL --:w-okiNe- ..mor7. NIVIIIIMM7/ iNLMIVIUSW IV L NUMMI \NMI IMIW MINIIW.WININNIIIII•i--_,ALMMEM............r-WAMMIr.7* I' 71 A101i74.11POINIMInININESIIIII MEM MIIWI-A■11111UP-ALIIIINIINW Ai' ......_`. AL•••• ININNINILL i‘Wit7P.'..?..a ',..11M I 7-2..' I /MN/ IIMMION O''''-..• 1 a MM In MOMMINII 4/401101•11111.11M=.111..11111111Illr AEI A MINI 19.1 WNW =ALIN= • BIN W Mr IS-AANININNWW1, =" amaimosuare,,.-..NIMMIN M.110ile.VIINIC.,:i1GA IlliallIN wr IM,AWW• IIW 11111111MMINMMIN ONION M • Immu meat."1..,4 -4•14a4411 ll V IMIII•Lb.... liki.75 L•Nailill IIIIIIIIIIWNWINtill/W'AMMIIIIIMIW INNMI '1111111INWANINIMIINilIf IIIIIINI 1=1INIAA•RWIIII WI IWIFII.IMI ''ILMOSANIf NIIII=IM WI! NW IW.,..ZMWAINOMFJNIVINMIM .MIL/,••1•Mr /1///SIWASFAN.Z".:11.4I/MIIIINI/fS II I IIIII' AlIWAINWA LIC.IWINIMWINWIIII I' MIANIII • /11111111111111W4/ S.;....Alr/IIN II1111/ PAM AN& NNMIIMIANIM 1.01,.•r•" JIM Ileralk.,INMIIIIM /M =I. rAwmumeiwasor IN 411116-1U1I.V.M1W /M 411/7/=/1/ I/ IMM.`_711 maistrirrwa MINI WIWI NINWINIWEN1 /If III MIN MWINIMINNW NM MAW/ ILINIIIIN VII WWI II Intl% • IIIIIINI I IIIIII•Ar" INNOININRILMLNI f IIIIM 0 =MIIINNIMZIPLI, ' AMIN' 1!..170.1Ft11/1771 NIMBI MIM!'Ate IMOD I NWIFIS1‘111M1 //1111/ AN/IINVItiMiNiil /20/ ' INIIIMMILLINZAIIIIMIln. ININMI WIIIIIIIMI INIIII AI 1"..IIMMII ,1M IIII1 ANII 111W• .MI IIII III x7/7/ /II ,_. MIN BMW asswg SW 741111 NW / ./2411/1 /V Ma= MN/ 0 AMILIV/ iiM. //NM i JIFAIM1MW IIIIM IIMINIIII ..1,4ff .•611111 II 47 II ..0, Site Design 8100 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 (612) 595-0055 FAX: 595-0080 Dallas Office: (972) 385-9251 Corwriaht 2000 Pick garrison 71e -esion Corporation Tangent 162.44' 135.05' 197.59' 162.89' 88.22' 392.32' 39.15' 83.88' 25.54' 38.95' 14.49' 81.65' 51.85' 14.93' 17.31' 6.26' 27.49' 26.67' 16.76' 19.56' 182.57' 163.25' 90.34' 31.55' 19.53' 9.46' 20.63' 10.72' 101.04' 1.17' 20.94' 14.33' 7.98' 20. 18' 23.26' 14.75' 18.30' 21.25' 12.19' 21.87' 24.64' 24.67' 25.06' 14.67' 30.07' 26.68' 1.16' 58.11' 144.72' 63.39' 186.59' 121,23' 128,11' 39.16' 120.41' 198.45' 67.18' 20.77' 132.97' 40.07' 78.23' 172.43' 58.14' 375.22' 4.15' 5.0 154.51' 48.88' 12.32' 123.86' 59.77' 13.90' Chord Bearing N 26°17'30" E S 28°56'45" W S 70°42'21" W N 74°50'12" E S 56°39'25" W N 59°06'48" W N 04°05'19" W S 14°34'08" E • S 42°21'12" E N 38°54'54" W N 43°03'01" E S 31°47'39" E N 52°58'08" W N 19°05'38" W S 44°31'59" E S 31°23'35" E S 17°04'02" W S 61'19'00" E S 52°43'47" E N 51°44' 11" W S 14°42'38" W N 24°26'21" W N 75°40'00" E N 09°07'23" E S 88°37'38" W S 37°23'33" E N 71°06'35" E S 44°21'43" W S 62°33'39" W N 57°07'51" W N 63°48'08" E N 75°34'02" E N 75°43'21" W N 40°38'41" W N 76°50'28" W S 33°26'38" E N 07°10'56" E N 02°56'16" W 5 88°47'57" E N 81°38'50" E N 64°16'03" W N 52°05'47" W N 75°19'02" W S 56°05'14" E S 42°06'59" E N 51°10'20" W N 37°13'04" W N 04°59'57" W S 10°49'45" E 5 50°29'34" E N 06°44'08" W N 87°28'02" W N 25°17'53" W S 77°51'48" E S 85'52' 15" E S 35°36'59" E S 17°21' 16" W S 36°07'40" E N 52°50'28" W N 43°33'55" E N 07°43'48" W N 41°36'46" E N 54°16'35" W S 21°51'07" E S 38°25'40" W N 84°54'04" W N 15°56'34" W N 89°04'07" W '48' 50" W N 76° '7" W N 52°12'48 S 79°4100" W '07'20" E S 8 2" W S 81°27 4 S 79°1645" E N 29°35'28" W S 89°33 5" E N 6 53" W N 0°25'38" E 411-t ues A Planned Neighborhood By: L.S. -onne Corporction r