The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000-03-13 CPC Packetl� 1 Ater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, March 13, 2000, at 7 p in in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of February 13, 2000 AGENDA Public Hearings 1 Case No SUP/00-11 A special use permit for a therapeutic massage and holistic skin care at 406 South Third Street in the PA, Public Administrative Office District Gary Howe, applicant for Colleen Geraghty -Behrendt 2 Case No V/00-12 A variance to the side yard setback (10 required, 4 feet requested) for the construction of a 2-story addition to the existing residence at 610 South Broadway Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Summer Kuehn, applicant 3 Case No ZAM/00-01 A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone from Agricultural Preservation, AP to Lakeshore Residential, LR at 7155 Melville Court North Rick and Karen Reidt, applicants 4 Case No ZAT/00-01 A Zoning Text Amendment limiting garage size to 1,000 square feet and three stalls in Lakeshore Residential, LR, and Traditional Residential, TR, Districts City of Stillwater, applicant Other Items CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430 8800 0 Planning Commission February 14, 2000 Present Russ Hultman, vice chair Robert Gag, Karl Ranum, John Rhemberger, Darwin Wald and Terry Zoller Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent Glenna Bealka, Jerry Fontaine and Dave Middleton Mr Hultman called the meeting to order at 7 p in Approval of minutes Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval of the minutes of Jan 10, 2000, all in favor Mr Hultman introduced and welcomed new member Robert Gag Case No SUP/00-06 A renewal of a special use permit to sell popcorn from a popcorn wagon at 401 S Main St in the CBD, Central Business District Jason Succo, applicant Mr Succo is owner of Stillwater Farm Store where the popcorn wagon is located Mike Bastien, owner of the wagon, was present for the discussion He said he is in his fifth year of running the operation There have been no complaints in the past • Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned for a period of three years, all in favor Case No SUP/00-07 A subdivision to combine two lots, Lot 8 and 9, Block 1, Myrtlewood, into one lot of 24,171 square feet and to vacate the drainage and utility easements existing between the common or shared interior lot line between the subject lots of 100 and 112 Myrtlewood Court in the RA, Single Family Residential District Richard Huelsmann, applicant Mr Huelsmann was present He said the request was prompted by the sale of the property to an individual who proposed to build one single-family home on both lots The structure will be subject to the same setbacks and covenants as others in the development Regarding the conditions of approval, Mr Huelsmann said approval of the city engineer is forthcoming Regarding the condition that a legal survey be recorded, he said he had talked with County Recorder Cindy Koosman who said her office would only need a letter stating that Lot 8 and 9 are to be taxed as one parcel Mr Huelsmann said he also had talked with City Attorney David Magnuson who confirmed that a legal survey would not be necessary since the area is already platted Mr Russell agreed that since this is a recent subdivision, with good legal descriptions of the properties, a legal survey need not be a requirement Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Ranum, moved approval, eliminating condition of approval is No 2, motion passed unanimously 6 Planning Commission • February 14, 2000 Case No SUB/00-08 A resubdivision of lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 1, Matt Hooley's Addition into five lots Lot 1, 12,000 sq ft , Lot 2, 24,496 sq ft, lot 3, 12,749 sq ft, lot 4, 16,786 sq ft , lot 5, 138,038 sq ft at 1765 Northwestern Ave in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Heartland Office Village, Leonard Pratt, applicant Larry Werthein and Ron Alwin were present representing the applicant They explained that in addition to the fact that the four existing lots don't match the actual building locations, the intent is to create a common interest development, much like a townhouse association, in which the common areas are owned by the tenants Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No V/00-09 A variance to the front yard setback for construction of addition (30 feet required, 26'2" requested) and third stall to an existing garage (30 feet required, 21'2" requested) at 1309 Hillcrest Dr in the RB, Two Family Residential District Jay and Renee Swanson, applicants, represented by Damin Lindquist, architect Jay and Renee Swanson were present They explained their plans are to construct an addition consisting of a master bedroom and walk-in closet on the south side of the home, a third stall to the existing garage, and to tear down and enlarge an existing deck on the rear of the home They said they had a petition signed by most neighbors supportive of their plans During the discussion, it was noted that the only variance required is for the rear yard setback Mr Russell stated the Swanson's garage can be as close as 20 feet, based on the average setback of the neighboring properties Mr Russell further noted that there is good reason for the variance in the rear, to keep the structure 30 feet away from a slope of greater than 24 percent Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Mr Swanson asked how long the variance is in effect, the Swansons were told the variance is good for two years from when a building permit is obtained Case No SUP/DR/00-10 A special use permit for construction of a 10,744 square foot warehouse/office building at 1900 Tower Drive (Lot 12, Block 2, Kern Pauley Addition) in the BP-O, Business Park Office District Stillwater West LLC, Ray Kennedy, applicant Mr Kennedy was present He stated he was aware of the 21 conditions of approval and had no problem with those conditions Mr Wald, seconded by Mr Rhemberger, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Mr Russell pointed out the proposal will got back to the Heritage Preservation Commission for further review Other items There was a request for a Planning Commission member to serve as a representative to the Lakes Links Trail Group Mr Hultman volunteered to do so 2 Planning Commission February 14, 2000 Mr Zoller again asked about scheduling a workshop Mr Russell said that will be done soon, perhaps in March Mr Wald, seconded by Mr Rhemberger, moved to adjourn at 7 40 p in Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary to LI 3 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/00-12 Planning Commission Date March 13, 2000 Project Location 610 South Broadway Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Summer Kuehn Type of Application anance Project Description Variance to the side yard setback (10 ft required, 4 ft requested) Discussion The applicant is requesting a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a two-story addition to the house The existing house is built 4 feet from the property line on the north side There is a large oak tree on the south side of the house, which would be damaged if the addition were built anywhere near it • The exiting house sits on a double lot If it were just one lot, the request would exceed the permitted lot coverage in the Two Family zoning district Maximum lot coverage allowed is 30 percent Conditions of Approval 1 The addition be similar in architectural style, color and materials as the main structure Drainage from roof shall remain on site 2 All plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Building Official 3 The double lot cannot be subdivided due to the impervious surface coverage of the house with an addition Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that • a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors • 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Photos/Elevation Drawmg/Floor Plan/Site Plan • 1 Case No C d Date Filed 60 Fee Paid r1 Receipt No _ PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED FEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Certificate of Compliance 70 CITY OF STILLWATER _ _ Conditional or Special Use Permit 50/200 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET T Design Review 25 STILLWATER, MN 55082 y Planned Unit Development* P5500 1� Variance 200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* 300 Subdivision* $100+$50/lo Resubdivision 100 Total Fee --401`10 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 0 t) Assessor s��arcei No R. A , 030, dU, 0 UO7a Zoning District Description of roject Aaltw , 2 02 h!. "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner_ SLUIl1MC J7 [�ACLO Representative Mailing Add Telephone No Signature Lot Size (dimensions) 10 0 Land Area Height of Buildings Stones Principal Accessory xI cling Address Telephone No Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION VF 0 ` Total budding floor Area sq ft Existing 1, � Lf � sq ft Proposed 1 j 0 0 Ll sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 .y 3 ti �435 �,��s 437 z 441°p o = 438 G+ ig�REE� �° 0 'off m 501� ,6 6 06 O ° `N 064 — 206 620 ° J �-655° — ,660--- — , 70 Tri EAST WILLARD STREET C� i 715 71 Location Map 031 7 -Q9 —1 3 717I72n- 71,2 11 I ° 7-03—� —7 709 1 n �1 7 R �7 � 718 . 1Q1W R20W MW 13J1127N 73 n T2 n n R22W R21W R20W Vlanty Map 0 166 Scale in Feet m.e.+v.,wae. mab ra.o W�sry� bn! Date February 24, 2000 • To Stillwater Planning Commission/City Council From Summer Kuehn 610 South Broadway St Stillwater, MN 55082 RE Variance Request for Addition to Home at 610 South Broadway Street I am requesting that a variance be granted to the 10 setback, from my homesteads Northern property line I am requesting this to allow for a 2 story addition to the existing home's structure The purpose of this addition is to add a family dinning area and laundry room downstairs and 2 bedrooms and a bathroom upstairs We currently do not have a dinning room nor does my son have his own bedroom Our clothes washer and dryer are also currently located in our kitchen The addition will remedy all of these problems I believe that this addition will be a positive improvement not only to my own home but also to the South Broadway neighborhood as well I am requesting that a variance be granted allowing the addition to be built in alignment with the existing structure with only a 4 setback from the Northern property line My reasons for requesting this variance are 1 ) The requested positioning of the addition will allow for the best utilization of the homes existing interior space, in incorporation into the design of the addition 2) The requested variance will allow the addition to better reflect the "Grecian Victorian symmetries with which my home was designed and built in 1860 3) The existing home is already positioned 4 from the Northern property line as no such set back rules were in effect at that time (1860) 4) My neighbors to the North, who would be most potentially affected by the addition have their home • situated on the Northern lot (Lot 1) of their 2 lot parcel (Lots I & 2 of block 43) This affords them a one lot wide piece of land between their home and mine 5) The site of my proposed addition, still contains the large concrete slab from the ` Summer Kitchen that used to be aback the home The positioning of the former' Summer Kitchen was also 4 from the Northern property line There is also currently a small 'Play House positioned 4' from the Northern property line This structure will be removed from its current location, if the variance is granted for the addition 6) In the past 10 years numerous renovation projects have been undertaken in the South Broadway neighborhood, to improve the living conditions, while retaining the heritage of the neighborhood In fact, 6 of the 7 homes immediately adjacent to mine have undergone varying degrees of renovation in that time span I believe that the alignment for which I am requesting the variance is the best way to accomplish both of these ends For the reasons stated above I am requesting that a variance be granted, allowing for a 4 setback, instead of a 10' setback Granting this setback variance will allow for the most complimentary and functional positioning of a 2 story addition to the West side of my home located at 610 South Broadway (lots 3 & 4 of block 43 original City of Stillwater) Thank you or your consideration /Zko Summer Kuehn Home owner E QN. NEW Sy . . . . . . . . . . . ....... Em LAO t e _ y a �,6.� -._.(. •.. �� 4 is dam f yf�ir .ya• 1r '� te aN Qu .l � v t Y 4 r. ,x. •ems. ss;.�� `� � * aa � � -�.� ,:_:. �' '}}P i'h.,,x. F sf�-T+� .+e� } t �'i.`;s.�,,,,l,r a..•.wi3ix�wv-�-X a 1, 4' �'. �'t %` O' K ff a t ^'}t ^'- f . ZEY,S� / 3J �Y Z� ti�3 � .y .VRM '�.•, Z � 1��'� 'i" Ah R � l r S W? L -.• Ph IF'�•� •M�-!,1 .w,1� }. l ,�t+ tF^fi• `� -`f.. •iWM1 '1 Y � a,K'�r 'L''-. if .. ,7 � • x 3 4 � 1 T +tea � S, l Sougi4 buh w" s--r fDU TIDC WYLSIDE` whLIC sioL v� �`- � f I r � I i Y r G �2�U � C i ��'��n?J1S � �� `� - _- _ _ ,- _^ ,i_- ,, S - __ ` �� /�1 � �_ � � �----' ,, ' y� ,a -� i i ii } 1 � � ,, ,�� , � �, d,� �� ,--�� -, �., � � _�l � � - - = ' � �-�-� ld 4� a1 � ) �- �� = � _� , �. _ -= - J�x 30 V O N f I i 28 8 I I _ 18'-1 112". _ — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — I OPEN BELOW 4 " N I N ' � I co , I 1 DN LANDING MASTER BDRM ° 24sgft l 181sgft r----- M BEDROOM 125 sq q VANITY 40 sq ft N = i N e mN T i I N LIVING AREA o 478 sq ft m •i � I � i r - IV 6112" ` 1' 5 112 N l 28130 0 N N 0 • • SAWHORSE Dcyigners & BuddLry 4740 42"d Avenue North Mn 2382 Robhinaclile MN 55422 ,,.., i J 612533 0352 1 ax 612 533-26GS Post it- Fax Note 7671 oate' _Z 1 cee s► Y From COJDept Co Phone R 1 P J3^ Fax R SOO/TOO (n ONI HSHOMIVS 999'VCSZT9 Xva 9Z 9T RHI OOOZ/t-Z/ZO 2(74r 13 7 1/2' c 7 91/2' FUTURE DOOR 71 11 37-9' 7 2' J-�c- 6 1 (r 6-6 14 1 0 • • MENO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Zoning Ordinance Amendment Rezoning 3 45Acres of Land Lakeshore Residential, 20,000 square foot minimum per lot, from Agricultural Preservation, AP, Rick and Karen Reidt, applicants Case No ZAM/00-01 r, Date March 13, 2000 The request is to rezone lands within the 1,000 of Long Lake Lakeshore Residential, minimum 20,000 square feet per lot This designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Recommendation Approval Attachment Application/Map/Letter/LR Lakeshore Residential District Ordinance (Subd 11 1) Case No SAM Date Filed iv Fee Paidy Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance $70 Conditional or Special Use Permit $50/200 Design Review $25 Planned Unit Development* $500 Variance $70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 ,4— Zoning Amendment* 300 Subdivision* $100+$50 Resubdivision $100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 1(5c) Nifft I K- (�+ N Zoning Distric_A . Description of Project Assessor's Parcel Po t��tJ�10`��1 P- 0,`{�z�-c,lJ_0d p �i "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if ►t►sii.. granted and used " Property Owner _1 Ict 4 kv,4,\ ko A Representative Mailing AddressI105-me LU► (le- U Al- Mailing Address Telephone N 5 1- W (0 n Telephone No Signature r Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) Land Area Height of Buildings Stories Principal • Accessory x Feet Total building floor Area sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5366TM ODXgA-.V ..q = MW c.-.a s�AP��V VI��/M+O�Vi myp4RJ �P�M�W M �� Pldm PPrV9M'�4�V1 aaad U! aims NEWEa 6LZ 0 dqN AtioA A10Za1 A11ZN Mllaa HIu I XSEL NSEL NaL NXI. NIEL ICL HICL N A161U A%= MIZS WI AVERYO File Folder Labels Laser 5366TM 1/31/2000 • Clayton Eckles City Of Stillwater Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Clayton, This letter is to inform you of our preliminary intentions following a meeting with the residents of Jackson Estates and Homer Tompkins Based on proposed plans to improve Melville Court North with curb, gutter and city services, we support improvement of the entire street (versus only the portion that fronts Liberty on the Lake) With respect to the entire improvement of Melville Court, it is our position that we may subdivide our property to include two additional lots Each additional lot will have approximately 150 feet of frontage on Melville Court North Sincerely, Rick and Karen Reidt Cc Steve Russell E To Stillwater Planning Commission • From Debra R F Irvine Date March 3, 2000 Re Reidt Property Zoning Change Request To Whom It May Concern Please take notice that I oppose the zoning change requested by Rick and Karen Reidt to be heard before the Planning Commission on March 13, 2000 I am unable to attend this meeting and request that this letter be accepted instead I own and reside at the property north and east adjacent to the Reidt property at issue Our neighborhood is comprised of three single-family dwellings (all part of the original historic farm property) and two lots (as yet undeveloped) These five properties operate under covenants agreed upon by all owners when they purchased their property These covenants prolubit the sub -division of the lots and allow only one dwelling per lot They were written in order to guarantee the rural, private character of the neighborhood The owners in this neighborhood opposed annexation by the City of Stillwater We all came to Stillwater, attracted by the character of the area and sought to retain it After attending almost all of the City and Township meetings regarding the annexation, our wishes were overruled by the City's and the developer's interests to make this rural area a • city We were forced to accept a less than appealing annexation agreement, which offers some economic guarantees for those of us former residents of the township Now we are being asked to allow the development that we so strongly opposed to encroach further upon our solitude by allowing one of the landowners to subdivide their property If this owner is allowed this zoning change, it will create a domino effect with the undeveloped lots Once the character of this rural island is invaded by one landowner, it will be gone forever Further, while the annexation and consequent development may be seen to benefit Stillwater significantly with hundreds of new homes, this change in zoning will not significantly benefit the City It will however, greatly impact those of us who live there and value the current composition of the neighborhood It is my understanding that the Reidts are concerned about future assessments they may incur due to road improvements to Melville Court The Annexation Agreement precludes this from happening, therefore their argument is moot I encourage the Planning Commission to recommend not granting the requested zoning change It is time those of us who came to Stillwater for its character win one Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 430-3311 1 will be returning to Stillwater on March 18, 2000 0 Cc George and Nancy Hof 6 AsSMATES _ ErIN^ JA C K S O N E STATES INNESOTA OWNERc RTT KNOW ALL MEN B1 THES OR `L WAS G 0 COON C M 9E [ w Drop! ty 6 LUAIBd Neshl g AT N CORNER S C 30 E T e C 0 Z p 3 T 3ON 420w O M s rE 0 w* L 0 0 ST 899 FEE w ST OF T E The m^ Pe t of the So to me SSF ET SO r95 E0 1s 0 Oar E ST CO ER OF E w 5 35000 S f o the follow n des r E oe E w FEE O T E SEl4-SE O NW 04 E4 [OR O 0 C SO 9 CO4 R n 5 SE S T S E E T O Beg as I a th 0 SE gp. / S 5 C 3I 9] 3 EET a uta 15 de76 SEC 30 S; ITS 8 w I � a tl stars C! Of )BC 5894G SY��^t�:� / t� ''� // 9415 thetceaSouth 2Ce 94613E 5 T9 _� 1 c�}'� T� 292 06 fee (rem E R 72 j\TD a80940 Ec� Sy Il r 1�Ty I 9-3 �Z__-_- / - tl a t I d a C A T E � ' � j Oua Le ed6 C jP 509 09 Also that oa t Of the �- — as 0 eE-_�-- 5 ..5 0 r88 2248 8 / ACC O E I"' SEC SO Beg ng a Lne W I I _ m utes 15 6epor _-- 5C4T c E 3 $w i4 Nryl 9lb. 6T° Ce N _ \\ 6Outhea SLe y al np ai I I 40 M II%1 BASEMEN OOR O1 34 009 e05 1E p!P ELEVATION 8938 F ET ��; m along ten°e T J m I I a Lam' cm t z \ 0 380 OC fee Dec Des 00 m1 t O 0 2 50 AC + ��642 C w05 1neo t e �I 6 42 AC + I \ o a gle to the a S '� seconds Eas so WI tnence Nortr B S `\ J �/ L _ ✓ f J , , e?$00 I 1 X � Ir° 2 411 of the e5 O A-te Or She SK)UthaeS el`� \l In2 W h 4W o He a Ca sed t e same tt b 0Utl C Ud fD VB Ine fiLFe! Oyto �I W 3 p ti, a 1 w tna58 -he eor sad 9Gec Of r 4 V O `'O ^n I MwaAUM BASEMENT FLOOR ^ de 03 9 ^i W 2 Q' 0 of BY Geo 9e HO o I ELEVATION 893 a FEET 3 16 E d O C 9 S C J� 1P. \O C 32 300 4 `7 s2 = STATE OF MINNESOTA r O tPq f v >l O O y COUNTY OF cBaa ' 3 Orb J JJ �\ Ie 35 3 45 AC /W y U v` b Geo ge M Hp a a 4Jase A 1 d \S B4N /-,- so JSC Jp �I O4Jw _ _-� _ _ 0 3 JLb_ _ _ N 99 6 w / i V ,P^ / Note y Pu0 C �f Cot 300p T _ =_38 a• Q' W W \ ' __ _ • OCN O 2 O woo Ib d 220 00 ` 2 O w y d C 32863 SURV YOR C2! 3 -_-_ _ \� Vn ° E Im 1 `� 4P M1ti \ \ I B Ce A FOIL he Soy C It `° c '� 3p� \ �\b o �mz c a v j ° \ \� \ foSotAo ISsne net D at hthatl ail Is i A \ I ,j f �W h a / \� o s gneled on to Dla a d tr ^ \\ L iqo° , v ¢ q' 1 O O �¢ " 1 / the eon T t D T' N\\ `v O n / \ (\ 00 MINIMUM BASEMENT FLOOR o\\\ 0 675 AC A Icz / / 1 = \ \ Ce A O 2 M nne50 to O t ELEVATION 8938 FEET o$\ \ -"MINIMUM BAS M NT FL00 / STATE OF MINNESOTA n i 5$ \ \ i ^ELEVATION 897 B FEET i 1 \ COUNTY OF 1 4 \ \ me a Not ry Publ c th s _ \ 5 92 AC it Notary public LL b \ it cP COUNTY SURVF .1 'G'sGgY <w r`"/Ood„ V 1, o P suant to Chapter 820 LeN Ey 2000 0 1A V P $ r\\ h f vWi r J?� ^ J By Washington County But 5 sr N /` / EL^NEJ \ \ N\\0000. i ,Vv 1 TOWN OF STIt- _ \ �y I ( r 0 16400s1 �� NNf L OOQF� Appro ad by the Town Board =Oy Minnesota Statutes Section 5( I (�I 51g ad Chairman z i°O E R, O ;,o heT \ 9 `!' G W y 2 31"0 1 Re leveed by the Town of Stll NO -0 R 1i t N A I S 1 e.\ v Qti�ai �J f_ Signed o^ E E T< w �$i I "u3Q 1 et man EC 30 T30N R20w z� �( G A 9 NI N `\ �`' I N I 2� •y� I PO rorsr r seo FEET CE UNTY BOARC 11 i EST OFT E 50 r AST CORYER o C T Ewe9T 350 OO FEET OF TwE Alp roved by the Board O} Cl E1/ SE I/4 199 By \off' 1;�: a'Ts/o o Chairman County Bcn 3Sw CDR A SEC 30 M 'g0 \ EA Sr � 9° ad JJ 10 J 42C ` 63 �i� 0 9 t W SH GTON COU T C M 50 TN L E I e f 4+ pT SE CDR E9 SEC 30 CQ N Y AU T ,,SEC Sow 35903\ �� awl SO T L E T30 R Ow --�= - S Q�-- 2 0 17 863 S. SE \ NO delinqu t to as and t n _ 260 0] \ 9500 5 00 1 SEC 30 1 3 63 211515 \` _ By % \ S/363 --fir -_B W 9 iny[On 'county PU SE 4 ER BIO 23 2 q 20 SE 4 S. es 8 E 55 s e a �Ol/NTY TR�JSS • w 5 CDR ER ECr30 ~ `- e9 a E I T JON Rzow STRLET r�-5 C ant t eS due and p J 1 O DE OTES 1/2 INCH IRON PPE MO J- T L E S SFT NO M%RKEO WITH A PLA TN C P --1 I By 1I LOTL E Washington County SCR EO RI $ 9272 UNLES HUwY ((p l OTHERWISE _1_- _ II-__ _-__ D T FS SHOwN TO FEET 110 30 ETCJ COIJN T_-F3 FS,C 12 ARE EX ACT EATRNSIC V LUE FEET xume t Number 10 ORR ATO OF rHS 6E RNG S St M IS ASSLN FO I At AGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT I53 eby i t fy th s Ost R TE 5 0 F L O 4E 91 COON G D 29 D ER AND U0 FEET Nr WIDTHANo ADJONNG STREET LNES yY i S FEET INwOTH AND ADJO �r SIDE A 0 511 Ito -County F S I T LNNES UNLESS OTNERW" SPOwN §311 • • STILLWATER CODE be the average of the setback of the two adjacent main build- ings, or 1f there 1s only one adjacent main building, the set- back of the main building shall govern, but in no case shall a setback less than 20 feet be allowed or greater than 30 feet be required 2 Corner yard For corner lots where the corner side yard set- back or front yard setback for the main building on the adja- cent lot on the same street is less than the required setbacks, the corner lot setback for the adjacent main building shall govern, but in no case shall a setback of less than 20 feet be allowed 3 Side yard When there is an attached garage on one side of the dwelling, the garage set- back is five feet, provided that no habitable floor area is closer than ten feet from the property line and provided that the ga- rage is a minimum of 15 feet from the nearest structure on the adjacent lot 4 Side and rear yard An acces sory structure located entirely in the side yard at least six feet from the main building shall have a minimum side and rear yard setback of five feet (Ord No 669, 9 15 87, Ord No 860, § 1, 5-19 98) (4) Development regulations N • Supp No 1 Provision Subd 111 LR lakeshore residential district (1) Residential buildings and uses In the Lakeshore district, the following build ings and uses and their accessory build ings and uses are permitted a Dwelling houses each occupied by not more than one family b Parrs, playgrounds and other open space areas (2) Permitted uses ivith special use permits In a Lakeshore residential district, the following buildings and uses and their accessory buildings and uses are permit- ted by special use permit a Home occupations subject to all pro visions of the zoning ordinance reg ulating home occupations (3) Accessory buildings and uses Uses and buildings incidental to permitted or spe cial permitted uses are subject to the following regulations a All accessory structures must meet the requirements for the bluff and shoreline set forth in subdivision 33, shoreland management regulations b No retaining v. alls may be con- structed to create yard areas or sites for swimming pools No accessory buildings or uses that result in the cutting of trees or clear- ing of vegetation are permitted Area, setback, and height regulations Maximum building height Main buildincr Accessory building (garages) Minimum lot area CD31 12 Single Family 21/2 stones and 35 feet 1 story and 20 feet 20,000 square feet C 2 ZONING Prouision 3 Minimum lot width 4 Minimum lot depth 5 Minimum front yard requirements Front yard —House Front yard —Garage (front facing)' Front yard —Garage (side loading) 6 Side yard Interior House Garage Corner House Garage 7 Rear yard (any building) 8 Frontage Requirement? Single Family 80 feet 170 feet 25 feet 32 feet 20 feet 10 feet 5 feet 25 feet 25 feet 85 feet from OHW 35 feet §311 'Front facing garages must be setback at least six feet more than the front wall or porch line of the house Houze and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for variety of garage types and locations (front loaded side loaded and recessed) and front and exterior side house elevations 2NVhere two or more adjacent lots do not meet street frontage requirements the driveways must be combined (5) Design reutew Administrative design re b Accessory dwelling units are permit view by the community development di ted special uses in the TR district rector is required for all permitted and subject to the following regulations specially permitted buildings or uses in 1 Lot size must be at least 10,000 the Lakeshore district Building siting, square feet grading drainage, tree protection and ero- 2 May be located on second floor sion control measures must be reviewed above the garage by the community development director 3 The accessory dwelling unit for each development site (Ord No 854, § 2, 2-17-98) must abide by the primary strut ture setbacks for side and rear Subd 112 TR traditional residential district setbacks (1) Permitted buildings and uses In the tra- 4 The accessory dwelling must be ditional residential district, the following located in the rear yard of the buildings and uses and their accessory primary residence orbesetbacb buildings and uses are permitted from the front of the lot beyond a Dwelling houses each occupied by the midpoint of the primary not more than one family residence b Parks, playgrounds and other open 5 Off-street parking requirements space areas for an apartment and single (2) Permitted uses with special use permits family residence (four spaces) In a traditional residential district, the must be provided following buildings and uses and their 6 Maximum size of accessory accessory buildings and uses are permit- dwelling is 800 square feet ted by special use permits 7 The application required de a Home occupations subject to all pro- sign review for consistency with visions of the zoning ordinance reg- the primary unit m design, de- ulating home occupations tailing, and materials Supp No 1 CD31 13 /3 i • MEMORANDUM To Planning Commission From Steve Russell Date March 13, 2000 Subject A Zoning Amendment limiting garage size to 1,000 square feet and three stalls in Lakeshore Residential, LR and Traditional Residential, TR, Districts The amendment is to regulate the square footage of garages in the above districts This regulation will resemble the ordinance for garages in the Single Family Residential • District (RA) Recommendation Approval Garage ordinance amendment ZAT/00-01 Garage Regulations for Lakeshore Residential LR and Traditional Residential, TA Districts The maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings including attached and detached private garages and other accessory buildings shall be 1,000 square feet or ten percent of the lot area, whichever is less