Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-01-10 CPC Packetater. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, January 10, 2000, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of December 13, 1999 AGENDA Public Hearings �- 1 Case No SUP/00-01 A special use permit for residential use in a commercial district for a dwelling unit above a retail business at 125 South Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District Larry Nelson, applicant 2 Case No V/00-02 A variance for the following options "Scheme A" for an accessory building to exceed 120 square feet allowed, 480 square feet requested or "Scheme B" for a variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 10 feet requested) for the construction of a two -car attached garage at 906 5th Avenue South in the RB, Two Family Residential District John Prosser, applicant 3 Case No V/00-03 A variance to the sign ordinance to increase the size of the A in "Ace" of Ace Hardware (36 inches required, 36" plus requested less than a square foot) at 1650 Market Drive in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Arrow Sign, applicant Other Items CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800 Planning Commission • December 13, 1999 Present Jerry Fontaine, chairperson Russ Hultman, Karl Ranum, John Rhemberger, Kirk Roetman and Terry Zoller Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent Glenna Bealka and Darwin Wald (Tom Wiedner resigned effective December) Mr Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p in Approval of minutes Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Roetman, moved approval of the minutes of Nov 8, 1999, all in favor Case No PUD/99-54 and Case No SUB/99-55 Final Planned United Development and Final Plat Approval for 99 unit, 58 lot and 2 outlot development west of County Road 5 and north of 62"a Street North Tim Nolde, applicant Mr Nolde was present He stated he had worked closely with city staff in doing the roads and had made some changes in landscaping based on staff recommendations He said he was comfortable with all the conditions of approval • Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of Case No ZAM/99-2, all in favor Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of Case No ZAM/99-3, all in favor Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of Case No PUD/99-18, all in favor Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of SUB/99-19, all in favor Case No ZAT/99-1 A Zoning Ordinance text amendment establishing tree protection regulations City of Stillwater, applicant Mr Russell briefly reviewed the process to date and highlighted some of the changes made to the draft ordinance based on comments received at the several public meetings The ordinance applies to projects requiring a development permit — conditional use permit, special use permit, variance, plat approval, etc The ordinance allows up to 30 percent of the trees to be removed, with a replacement rate of 10 trees per acre, if the 30 percent limit is exceeded, the replacement is one -for -one Clear cutting is not allowed The regulations apply to slopes of greater than 24 percent, bluffland and ravines Forester Kathy Widin noted the most recent revision is substantially different than the first draft She said this revised proposal builds upon the original ordinance and reflects changes based on concerns/comments from people on both sides of the issue The penalty of $25 per diameter inch has been removed, for example Ms Widin stated that nothing other than the 30 percent removal threshold is stronger than the existing ordinance, everything else in the new ordinance is basically recommendations/education Planning Commission • December 13, 1999 Don McKenzie, 72°d Street, spoke in opposition and provided written comments with suggested language changes In addition to the 30 percent removal threshold, Mr McKenzie's primary objections centered on the language in (4)b of the proposed ordinance "Development must (be) conducted so that the maximum number of trees are preserved by the clustering and siting of structures or improvements in clearings " Mr McKenzie objected to the use of the word "must", preferring "may", he also noted the existing ordinance provides for some flexibility and creativity of development by allowing the "utilization of other site design techniques " It was the consensus of Commission members that the language providing for flexibility and creativity of site design be retained Marc Putnam, representing the "underlying property owners" of Liberty on the Lake, spoke in opposition to the proposal and agreed with Mr McKenzie's concern regarding the language in (4)b, specifically the word "must " He suggested the "must" be changed to "should " He also spoke against the replacement fee, and asked about an appeals process Mr Russell noted an appeals process is part of the city's Zoning Ordinance Laurie Maher, Marine Circle, and Nancy Brown, member of the city's tree task force, both spoke against changing the wording from "must" to "should " • Mike Brochman, McKusick Road, asked whether the regulations would apply to paving projects as would seem to be indicated in section (4)c Mr Russell explained the regulations would apply only if paving projects required a development permit It was the consensus of Commission members to add language clarifying that Bud Buchman, Boutwell Road, suggesting eliminating the language "similar to species removed" in section (6)f2 He suggesting clarifying the language "must preserve the understory" in section (4)d to more clearly state the desired outcome He also suggested using the term 30 percent of the tree canopy versus the number of trees Ms Widin agreed with Mr Buchman's reasoning for changing the language in (6)f2 Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Zoller, moved to change the wording "must" to should" in section (4)b Motion passed 4-2, with Mr Ranum and Mr Roetman voting no Mr Rhemberger moved to change the tree removal threshold from 30 percent to 40 percent Motion died for lack of a second Mr Roetman, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved to recommend approval as amended — changing must to should, retaining language allowing for some design flexibility, clanfymg language regarding the section on paving, and including Mr Buchman's recommendation removing "similar to species removed " Motion passed 5-1, with Mr Rhemberger voting no I* Planning Commission December 13, 1999 • Case No SUB/99-50 A minor subdivision into two lots, Lot A of 12,132 square feet and Lot B of 12,243 square feet, at 617 W Myrtle St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Dan and Tom St Claire, applicants Mr Rhemberger abstained from the discussion and vote on this case Both applicants were present They questioned the requirement for a turn -around Mr Russell explained that was determined by the city engineer Mr Zoller asked about the existing garage The applicants stated the garage meets setback requirements An easement for sewer and water is provided, they said Kathleen Charlsen, 728 W Olive St, stated she thought there was a moratorium on building in ravines Mr Russell stated there is no moratorium Kitty Johnson and Carlos Johnson, neighboring property owners, asked about the sewer and water easement, whether a lift station would have to be installed, and how that would affect their property Mr Zoller noted the requested subdivision meets all requirements Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Roetman, moved approval of the request as conditioned, all in favor, with Mr Rhemberger abstaining • Case No ZAM/99-4, Case No SUB/99-51, Case No SUB/99-52 Zoning map amendment and minor subdivision of 8260 Neal Avenue North and 8220 Neal Avenue North in the AP, Agricultural Preservation District Don Thron and Mitchell McKenzie, applicants Mr Thron was present representing both applicants He pointed out that the condition of approval regarding park dedication for both subdivision requests should be for two lots, not three as indicated in the staff memo, as there already is an existing lot Mr Thron also asked that condition of approval No 3 be changed so that rather than requiring the Creekside Crossing developer be compensated for road and utility improvements before any building permits are pulled, the applicants show there is an agreement in place with the developer for such compensation Mr Russell agreed that would be satisfactory Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Zoller, moved approval of Case No ZAM/99-4, all in favor Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of SUB/99-51 as amended, all in favor Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of SUB/99-52 as amended, all in favor Case No SUB/99-53 This case was continued to the January meeting Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Roetman, moved continuation, all in favor Case No V/99-56 A variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 18'3" requested) for construction of a solarium at 116 School St E in the RB, Two Family Residential District • Ronald and Kristen Lahner, applicant 3 Planning Commission December 13, 1999 • The applicants were present Mr Lahner explained they have limited choices for location of the addition due to the nature of the soils on the property Mr Russell noted a letter had been received from neighbors supporting the project • Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Rheinberger, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No V/99-57 A variance for an adoption agency to operate out of a residence at 721 Greeley St S in the RB, Two Family Residential District Eugene and Karen Lampi, applicants Mr and Mrs Lamp each addressed the Commission Mrs Lampi talked of the changing character of the neighborhood and asked the Commission to recognize the multiple -use character of the neighborhood The immediate neighbors have no objections to the use, she said Gary Williams and Carroll Rock, members of the HOPE Adoption board of directors, spoke for the request Mr Rock stated the board felt it would be advantageous for an adoption agency to operate from a home It was also noted that HOPE has been looking for other property, but rental is expensive for the non-profit agency Robert Richards, 905 W Abbott, spoke against the request, citing concerns about increasing traffic and pointing out that according to the City's ordinance, a home occupation must be incident to the residence and this request would not qualify under the ordinance Also speaking in opposition were Dennis Munson, 916 W Abbott, Ernest Peaslee, 1017 W Abbott, Richard McDonough, representing his mother, Mary McDonough, 1005 W Willard St , and Colette Preimesberger, 819 W Abbott St Concerns expressed centered on traffic, possible devaluation of properties, turning the existing backyard into a parking lot, possible lighting of the parking area Mr Williams and Mr Rock stated the use would not generate a lot of traffic at one time, and there is adequate parking for staff Mr Williams also noted that should the Lampis sell their home for a reduced price, that, too, would result in devaluation of neighboring properties In the Commission discussion, Mr Ranum stated he concurred with the comments regarding the changing character of the neighborhood, but he noted this request falls outside of the home occupation permit Mr Zoller noted the intent of the home occupation ordinance was to accommodate cottage industry, and Mr Fontaine pointed out that according to the ordinance, the residence must be occupied by the owner and have no more than one outside employee Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Ranum, moved to deny the request Motion passed 5-0 (Mr Roetman left at 9 p in ) 4 Planning Commission December 13, 1999 • Case No V/99-58 A variance to the rear yard setback (5 feet required, 1 foot requested) for construction of a detached garage at 1330 S Second St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Tina Strandberg, applicant Most of the discussion centered on questions regarding the property line and the appearance that a side yard setback might also be required Mr Ranum pointed out that staff had not presented any need for a side yard variance Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed 4-1, with Mr Zoller opposed Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Ranum, moved to adjourn at 9 30 p m Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 0 5 ldk PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/00-01 Planning Commission Date January 10, 2000 Project Location 125 South Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Central Business District Zoning District CBD Applicants Name Larry Nelson Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit for residential use in a commercial district for a dwelling unit above a retail business Discussion The applicant is requesting a Special Use Pernnut for a residence on the second floor over first floor retail at 125 South Main Street The space would be approximately 1,200 • square feet There will be no exterior changes or signage The city already has a number of residential uses above other retail businesses in the downtown area To staffs knowledge there have been no reported issues with these residences Conditions of Approval 1 Approval of the Building Official 2 Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the zoning ordinance Attachments Application Form/Letter AP Case No `5 U 00to �� I Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No L PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM I� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance 70 17 Conditional or Special Use Permit 50/200 Design Review 25 Planned Unit Development* 500 Variance 70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* 500 Zoning Amendment* 300 Subdivision* $100+$50/lc Resubdivision 100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Address of Project Zoning District PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Description of Project Assessor's Parcel No "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner V122±pRepresentative `,'-IA Ul,(4 Mailing Address 12.6 6D LI�i Mailing Address 1 If? GJD ��U/lit.'!'f' fi11LUGl � Telephone Signature Telephone No Signatu SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION (dimensions) g ✓ 5�2-g sq ft Lot Size dimensions Z� x 12� � Total building floor Area Land Area Existing sq ft Height of Buildings Stones Feet Proposed sq ft •Principal Z Paved Impervious Area sq ft Accessory Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 I. A .. I' Y N I. I. 5: N F�A.WvvovIl �k vs rwtA �vl1--�u.t— 40 buctA a livmq MVt -� U17 luc� --:r- wotia Id occN P v� , a -I" /�AGe--- 1� 0V-1 -rGvZ. hec.av�d �r(ooY'' I'5 61Cr I,) ZOO Z-7 f- yVp C�'�A-�VII�j�S WJLnld wf-1e-� k0 kke, �uc�de a� +ke bWauAq • k"j �\w /-w-'/ 121) SCOU 11 MAIN ST 5 T I I IWi>,TE12. MV SbCo"ll2 T E 1 6 S I- 3 S I -2 9 S 9 1:AX 6 S I- 3 S I- 2 7 6 3 I'r 5° N:.A s fM3M w 7� � 18 REFU9. �1 s� 75 1B v • � 1�' 10 � N jUOloo�l $ iga N/� � 1p7 1 / 7 2 g5 15 ' b, �pj0'm s 0 Y2 = a 'L V la 7,1 ND"� °0b) 101 y CONDO N RYGG 9 p9 1 W Was) 7) N m o m, 6 _ NosS] (0103) PARIA 6 '25/1 Z'o `� � m .w NNE 36 55 2 '` � S� PTE 3 � Nis 5 Nil tG Noo+l 30 70 59 q0 „5 CO N Nil �t � '0 50 so m" m = 2 4MSD) a 1) 3 S 2 S 31 G a U i l 59 4 � m o $ (0079) 5o ; yOm Noel �m S ` 28 (93sl w u NN/ 8 �5� tl 8 mu) ,, min 7 pal) 9�,9 10 S A 1.7) G,99 s` 9 Ey PE BKB9Gµp5 8 Ime+l IoCar10n Map o s10 ' R21W R29W RI9W n n2N ni nIN v°FTIIN naN n9N 729N 727N R22W R21W R2°W \unity Map 0 149 Scale in Feet �J �4mdbt dbdi@ib n M' PFo+e �/ „��1Wm Canlyb ny �epvuW brry�r�da Rv�l� ,®16P5 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM • CASE NO V/00-02 Planning Commission Date January 10, 2000 Project Location 906 50' Avenue South Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name John Prosser Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance for one of the following options "Scheme A" for an accessory building to exceed 120 square feet allowed, 480 square feet requested or "Scheme B", for a variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 10 feet requested) for the construction of a two -car attached garage Discussion The applicant is requesting a variance for "Scheme A" or "Scheme B" "Scheme A" • would add a two -car garage (520 square feet) to the west end of the existing residence It would have a second story family room above it The existing garage would remain The existing one story addition would be removed Adding an attached two -car garage to the residence would make the existing garage to be an "accessory" building Accessory buildings can be up to 120 square feet according to the zoning ordinance The existing garage is 480 square feet, which would mean the accessory building is 360 square feet larger than permitted by the ordinance There is an existing driveway on the immediate north side of the residence that would be used to access the garage "Scheme B" would require a variance for a three car attached garage to the west side of the house creating a 10 foot rear yard setback instead of the required 25 foot setback This scheme would have a second floor fanuly room In this scheme the existing garage would be demolished Conditions of Approval Should the Comnussion approve one of the requests above, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 The addition shall be similar in style, color and materials as the existing residence 2 Drainage shall remain on site 3 All plans shall be approved by the City Engineer and Building Official Recommendation • Denial of requests, a two -car attached garage could be constructed, the existing garage demolished without the need for a variance • Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form/Letter/Photographs/Site Plans _vl av—�- / -7D Fee: $25.0( • DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FO RM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and suppoi material submitted In connection with any application All supporting material (10.2 ph* sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project ` o 4 * 2* Al) E"-Iv E S Assessor's Parcel No • Zoning District Description of Project P(� Po SGt7 AR-r-pr�{'6 (�Vbo scq r-r) "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all date, inform flon eltd evidence submitted here ith In ail respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will com y with the permit if it Is granted and used " Property Owner, -%ol+n� A frlpsasiX Representative Mailing Address-40& Mailing Address City - State - Zip_ gAgV b Z- City - State - zp Telephone No _y51- 43jo--j o ZS Telephone No Signature e Signature &sad September 16, 1998 /99 17 21 FAX 651 351 7327 CY AT Planning Comnussion/C►ty Council City of Stillwater Minnesota • Re A garage addition to the Prosser residence 906 5th Avenue South Stillwater, Minnesota The existing single family residence is a two story wood flame structure The first floor is 1496 square feet and houses a living room, dining room, kitchen, entry hall, guest bedroom/den, fill bath and family room The second floor is 1254 square feet and has three bedrooms, two baths, and a sitting room/hall The existing garage (480 square feet) is an earth sheltered structure of concrete block and reinforced concrete on the north west corner of the property with access from Hudson Street Scheme A, with drawing attached, is to add a two car garage of 520 square feet on the west end of the existing residence with a second floor family room and to maintain the existing garage described above The approach to the new garage is an existing driveway on the immediate north side of the residence The existing one story addition to the house is to be removed. The alternate scheme S, with drawing attached, is to request a vanence for a three car attached garage with a backyard setback of 10`-0' and to remove the existing concrete block and reinforced concrete earth sheltered garage A second floor family room would maintain a 2:7-0" backyard setback. The approach is as scheme A and the existing one story addition is to be removed • Photograph #1 The existing house (now with siding) and earth sheltered garage (under temporary storage shed to be removed) as viewed from 5th Avenue South Photograph #2 The existing earth sheltered garage (showing temporary storage shed to be removed) viewed from Hudson Street Photograph #3 The west end of the existing residence and yard planned to recieve the two car garage and second floor family room addition 0 �.. c j Y • . w : :j y OF � � �% i �' % { t T �;{♦fir Rt�rf+_ II, � c. . f �) j;5rf� �•1,. �':i �7 r 'c�. y�1r�M � f1r ; 1, c L.. ��j1� ..` art• ' �, 1+ ; ,_ , y ti,t "' �sr ),ter+ y � rM ,f yv•.:�. r; I l\��,� L � '•�o:. ,i• '. 1, y 1� r�`�'r S � �l Ll � , -tr 't � �l• r �. C i � Ij ' �'-� ku'+~� La 2 �1111� y r 1: ry.L � -.�1 t a M Ulf �,,��}},. � t �,)L � r �. - cry '•'1 �- � rl \I-ft T-P M 7- 11 0 0 Tb l A1- r oT AF-eP IS, 5" 5Q FT I-OT COV F K-A � F- 22ce `q E x i ST i nti, 4lR a -Pc, e L-M 60V w- ,,bA E 400 iDT Lor eeviE:,tL Pei 1-7,sj!5 0 _�"o s 4kyo,�,orj -jr R, oli v-t rG+r-,iJ - _ T cWk 11I'NRII & al a,?- TOTAL LOT A?-eP- I qI E;Q Pr, (�F�lpEt� i ATrPe-MV-P 4AaACjr I_o-r e-Ove*-,Nz,E ubo �Q ram. XDT,64- Lar e*jw-AG, E h, S4 zti pp�"- It, , n i PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM • CASE NO V/00-03 Planning Commission Date January 10, 2000 Project Location 1662 and 1650 Market Drive Comprehensive Plan District Business Park Commercial Zoning District BP-C Applicants Name John Reiter, representing Ace Hardware Type of Application Variance Project Description A variance to the sign ordinance to increase the size of the letter A in "Ace" Discussion The applicant is requesting approval to install a 36" sign on the east side of the building with the "A" in the word "Ace" be a little larger The tip of the "A" would extend slightly above the allowed 36" height, it would be less than 1 square foot The 24" IS lettering on the west side would be the same The slightly larger "A" is part of the corporate logo of Ace Hardware Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggest the following conditions of approval 1 No additional signage Recommendation Approval Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardslups justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of tins title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan • Attachments Application Form/LetterBuilding Elevations I Case No WOO - 3 Date Filed 0� Fee Paid A00 Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED FEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Certificate of Compliance 70 CITY OF STILLWATER _! Conditional or Special Use Permit 50/200 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET -� Design Review 25 STILLWATER, MN 55082 Planned Unit Development* 500 - Variance 70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* 500 Zoning Amendment* 300 Subdivision* $100+$50/lot Resubdivision 100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project d '­&V-6 Assessor's Parcel No 30OZOsa40 Zogir)g District Description of Project "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify 1 will comply with the permit If It ►s granted and used " Property Owner c%.{M- Representative Q (Z,/i Oil) Mailing Address iling Address _b&t:�N 11►4M L4 w Telephone No 09301 -5 Telephone No ASS - 2 (i�% 3 'M Signature _� Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRI T Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stones Feet •Principal Accessory Total building floor Area sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 Stillwater Ace Hardware Request for variance to install 36" Ace Hardware logo according to the Ace Hardware • Corporate Signage Criteria Ace Hardware neon channel letter signage is measured by the height of the letter "E" in The Ace Logo All additional text is to be the same height as the top crossbar of the letter "E" The additional text is to be in Helvetica Italic upper & lower case text The original meeting of the Heritage Preservation commission dated August 2, 1999, was attended by the builder (Mr Jun Kellison) who represented Ace Hardware He was granted a sign package stating Ace Hardware would be allowed 36" and 24" lettering on the East building Elevation and 24" & 18" lettering on the West building elevation Our variance asks that we be allowed to install a 36" Sign according to Ace standards which would have 21" lettering "Hardware — Paint & Rental for the East Elevation and A 24" Ace with 14 5" lettering Hardware Paint & Rental for the west elevation This would put the tips of the "A's" over the 36" & 24" heights by less than one square foot per sign The alternative sign approved by city code would allow 36" ACE and 24" HARDWARE — PAINT & RENTAL would be much larger and have a greater impact on the property This sign would be less preferable as it does not conform to the Ace Standards Please direct any questions to John Reiter @ Arrow Sign Company 612-755-8873 E r 7 w 4 d 'tea a 7 6 8 s.a n 9 'DO It 0 g'® a a� �w LANE a OUTLaTB i z; ®m an db a 0 PER 10 BK32 D4,:4f , -b •AI" ¢ S �m ,r a g Is e ERffNT PER DOC 1=234 9 DM xs �' om 48mas N a °4q�°oc so r J o Ipm PAJ ILLWATER 6 OUROT �a 1 � 5 �1 o� 2 �QQ- \off � � a 2 DRAINAGE ANDunuT/ /aV 9 EASEMENT > 'Qro OUTLOT F nm 92 a A mx A so 0&0 we 20 FT WIDE DRAINAGE AND EST BLVD 1 s Location np 9'1T11 I SAE A � -- R21W R20W R19W 77 732N n T31N 770N ,W ARE 729N 724N T11N 72IN 723N J 727N R22W R21W R20W Vlandy Map 0 187 Scale 1n Feet ab JrYp=-=a mrPlaYn .�a�mmaab�a�mebM .�i: a�rwa pup>ary Nb1iVm Gavrybiv nyo��b�ryYm� tj _ f 18 1-3/4 WEST ELEVATION NEON CHANNEL LETTERS SCALE 1/4' =1 PAINT bF RENTAL 118" 19 3-1/2 LOCATION STILLWATER MARKET PLACE DATE-CUSTOMER APPROVAL SKETCH # 7013rr SALESPERSON DRAWN BY THIS IsaNORIGINaLBYJR EKE-9TZWATSRl TB ARROW SIGN CO RIBSign C® Aberdeen St m Lake MN 55304 (812)75:%873 12)7551473 NOT TO BE REPRODUCED ORPAGES COMEDMHOMTHE13735 CONSENT OF ARROW SIGN 00 ®COPYRIfiiT1B8BBYMROWSIGNCO DATE �O WEST ELEVATION NEON CHANNEL LETTERS SCALE 1/4 -1 ' DENOTES 24' HEIGHT LETTER E " DENiTES HEIGHT THAT 'A EXTENDS OVE: E LOCATION STILLWATER MARKET PLAGE REVISIONS 11/18/99 APPROVAL SKUCH # 7613 DRAWN BY THS IS AN ORIGM By gPAGEs ARROW SIGN OD IT IS Sign CoTB 13735 (Abend �7r a 2)78551479 NOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIEDWRHOUffTHE OONSENi OF ARROW SIGN 00 ®COPYRIGHT18988YARROWBIGNCO FILE ILL KE�nI I ��� pAT �O 25-0" 3roI.ICE.Na EAST ELEVATION NEON CHANNEL LETTERS SCALE 1/8" =1' WAREI24 25 -3 24IFAINT & RENTAL LOCATION STILL -WATER MARKET PLACE REVISIONS unit-twlvMtrinrrnvvnL 5Kk-IU 0 11/2/99 N BY 7613 OrrSALESPERSON DRAWTHSISANORIGINALBY JR 'B ARROW SIGN 00 rr IS �',,, co NOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR PAGES DAT OOPIEDWITHotnTHE FILE 13735Aberdeen Str mLake MN 55304 OONSENT OF ARROW SIGN OD AaSTUAIER (612)755-887 12)755.1473 ID ®COPYRI(iF1T169881ARRow9GNC0 KlEi� 5cs.., i `— 21-ro 2-81-7/8 EAST ELEVATION NEON CHANNEL LETTERS SCALE 1/8' =1' ' DENOTES 305" HEIGHT LETTER E " DENJTES HEIGHT A' EXTENDS OVER E LOCATION 5TILLWATER MARKET PLAGE REVISIONS 11/18/99 Orr DATE -CUSTOMER APPROVAL SKETCH # 7013 SALESPERSON DRAWN BY THs IS AN ORIGM By JR ARROW SIGN CO rr IS r. Sign 4o 13735 Aberdeen St am Lake MN 55304 (612)75S-88812)7551473 Co�BmER�ROGmoR THOUrTHE DAT ODNSFNT OF ARROW BMW 00 �� ©COPYRIGMIBM SYARROINSGN60 �/ c FILE KE-5¶LLWq� PAGES