Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-11-09 CPC Packet• (S,.jjjjMwater JL THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNES0TA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, November 9, 1998, at 7 p in in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of October 12, 1998 AGENDA 1 Case No SUP/98-68 A special use permit to construct a three -slip dock, landing and parking area at 1513 North Main Street in the RB, Two Family ResidentialBluffland Shoreland District John G Hoeschler, representing Randy Boller, applicant 2 Case No V/98-70 A variance to the front yard setback (30 ft required, 28 5 ft requested) for the construction of a screen porch at 1234 Third Ave South in the RB, Two -Family Residential District Erik W Ogren, representing Margaret A Ogren, applicant 3 Case No CPA/98-2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment establishing greenway corridors, parks and open space and trails for City Expansion Area City of Stillwater, applicant • 4 Case No ZAT/98-7 Zoning Ordinance text amendment amending the Shoreland Ordinance requiring buffer areas along Brown's Creek and setbacks from wetlands City of Stillwater, applicant 5 Case No V/98-71 A variance request for an attached one -car garage (294 square feet) and detached 936 square foot garage (one garage of 1,000 square feet maximum allowed) at 123 Birchwood Drive in the RA, One -Family Residential District Gary Midbrod, applicant Other Items 1 Case No PUD/98-69 A final planned unit development approval for 98 cottage lots within the Legends of Stillwater located west of Long Lake and north of 62nd Street North'Ryland Homes, applicant r f z -t - r � f t y y f 3 �3 rl CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 Planning Commission Oct 12, 1998 Present Chairperson Jerry Fontaine Glenna Bealka, John Rhemberger, Don Valsvik, Darwin Wald, Terry Weidner and Terry Zoller Others Community Development Director Steve Russell Absent Russ Hultman and Kirk Roetman Mr Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p in Approval of minutes Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval of the minutes of Sept 14, 1998, all in favor Case No SUP/98-60 A subdivision request to subdivide a 21,000 square foot parcel into three parcels of 2,900 square feet, 4,200 square feet, and 13,900 square feet at 219 N Main St in the CBD, Central Business District Mainstream Development Partnership, applicant Vern Stefan and Tim Stefan were present for the discussion • Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Valsvik, moved to recommend approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No SUPN/98-59 A resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2,Block 2, plus a 10 foot easement area, McKinstry and Seeley's Addition at 404 S Grove St in the RA, Single Family Residential District into two lots of 10,095 square feet Russ Kurth, Kurth Surveying representing Frank Biedny, applicant Case No SV/98-67 A request for a street vacation of the south 25 feet of Oak Street, along the north side of Lot 1, Block 6, McKinstry and Seeley's Addition in the RA, Single Family Residential District, Frank Biedny applicant Mr Kurth and Mr Biedny were present for the discussion Mr Kurth questioned why the recommendation was for the south 10 feet only, he said he though the north half of the street was already vacated Mr Russell explained it was the city engineer's recommendation that 15 feet is needed to accommodate possible future repairs to the storm sewer Mr Russell said the exact location and depth of the storm sewer needs to be verified, based on that information, the easement could be adjusted Mr Fontaine suggested that perhaps the approval should be stated as 15 feet from the storm sewer rather than a 10 foot vacation (easement) Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved to approve the street vacation (easement) 15 feet from the storm sewer line, motion passed unanimously Mr Valsvik, seconded by Mr Rhemberger, moved approval of the resubdivision request Mr • Zoller asked if Mr Biedny would meet the lot size requirement if the street vacation is less based 1 • Planning Commission Oct 12, 1998 on the location of the storm sewer Mr Russell said the minimum lot size requirement would be met, if the vacation is less, it would limit the design of a new structure that could be built on the lot Motion of approval passed unanimously Case No V/DR/98-18 A variance to the side yard setback (10 feet required, 3 feet requested) for construction of a 55 ft x 55 ft two-story classroom addition and a 50 ft x 70 ft ambulatory addition at 214 Third St N in the PA, Public Administrative Office District James Whipkey and Bob Ayres, representing Ascension Episcopal Church, applicant Present for the discussion were James Whipkey, Bob Ayres and Jane Stillman representing Ascension Episcopal Church Mr Whipkey reviewed the design plans The addition will be constructed of the same type of materials and detailing as the existing structure The existing parish hall will remain, with additions constructed on both ends The additions would be no closer to the property line than the existing structure The Third Street access will be maintained Mr Zoller raised a question about parking Mrs Stillman responded that the addition will not increase parking needs, the sanctuary itself is not being expanded Also, the addition will not result in any loss of existing parking spaces Mr Valsvik noted that according to an SEH study, there is no parking problem along Third Street • Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved approval as conditioned Mr Whipkey said they were aware of all the conditions and had no problem with any of the conditions Motion passed unanimously Case No V/98-61 A variance request to bluff setback (40 feet required, 23 4 feet requested) for construction of an addition to a garage at 114 Lakeside Dr, in the RB, Two Family Residential and Bluffland Shoreland District Jon and Deanne Stratte, applicants Mr and Mrs Stratte were present Colleen Weiss, 107 Lakeside Dr, spoke against the request and provided a letter for the record (attached) Also provided for the record was a letter from the Lakeview Harbor Association signed by Mark Smith, president, indicating the Association was not opposed to the request Mr Russell noted the Stratte property is in the Bluffland/Shoreland District He said Mrs Stratte had taken pictures showing the addition would not be visible from the river He also said the addition would have no impact on the Weiss' view of the river Speaking in favor of the request were Mary Mann, who stated the Strattes' request is based on a necessity, and Pat Rousseau, 120 Lakeside Dr Bob Knox, treasurer of the Lakeview Harbor Association, said he did not sanction or write the letter from the Association, however after reading the letter, Mr Knox said he had no objection Mr Zoller asked whether the letter was • N • Planning Commission Oct 12, 1998 representative of the Association's position, Mrs Stratte noted that 12 of 15 neighbors had signed the letter Mr Russell reviewed the requirements for making a determination regarding a property in the Bluffland/Shoreland District He said an important consideration would be hardship Dr Stratte explained the request, which will provide for laundry facility and bathroom, is needed due to Mrs Stratte's medical condition, pulmonary hypertension As the disease progresses, the heart enlarges and it will become more difficult for her to carry up laundry from the existing laundry area, also handicapped accessibility to the existing bathrooms will become an issue To convert an existing bedroom, as had been suggested, he said would mean that their daughter would not be able to stay with them when she visits, and it would likely impact the salability of the home Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved to approve the request as conditioned based on hardship (inability to access uses specific to the building) to the property owner Mr Weidner noted the existing garage and house already are in violation of the Bluffland setback requirements He suggested incorporating findings that there are no violations of the • Bluffland/Shoreland regulations into the motion The motion incorporating the findings passed unanimously Case No V/98-62 A variance to the front and side yard setbacks (30 ft and 10 ft required, 0 ft requested) to rebuild a garage at an existing location at 808 S Fifth St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Steve and Dorothy Hooley, applicants Steve Hooley was present Mr Fontaine abstained from the case, and Vice Chair Valsvik temporarily assumed the chairmanship Mr Hooley explained that the existing garage is caving in The only thing that would be changed is the installation of a two -car door, rather than a one -car The rebuilt garage would match the house materials Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No SUP/98-64 A special use permit request for a massage therapy business to be conducted from a residence located at 148 Myrtlewood Court in the RA, Single Family Residential District Phil and Gayle Panzmo, applicants Gayle Panzino was present and submitted a list of neighbors who indicated they were not opposed to the proposal She said off-street parking is available, she would have limited hours and no employees • 3 Planning Commission • Oct 12, 1998 Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Valsvik, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No V/98-65 A variance to the side yard setback (25 feet required, six feet requested) for construction of an attached garage at 109 Center St S in the RB, Two Family Residential District Dale Peterson, applicant Mr and Mrs Peterson were present Mr Peterson explained he was actually requesting three variances A side yard variance (4 feet), rear yard (18 feet) and square footage for accessory structure (32 square feet) to accommodate a three -stall garage, in addition to the house addition (kitchen, deck) He said he needed a third stall on the garage to provide storage for numerous pieces of equipment He said he would be willing to forgo the request to exceed the size of the accessory structure, however Mr Weidner noted that owning a lot of "stuff' doesn't constitute a hardship In the discussion, it also was noted that the request would create a great deal of structure on the lot Mr Rhemberger, moved to deny the variance for a three -stall garage and to approve a 13-foot variance to the rear yard setback to accommodate a two -car attached garage Mr Zoller seconded the motion, all in favor • Case No SUP/98-66 A special use permit request for a chiropractic/healing practice from a residence at 1055 W St Croix Ave in the RA, Single Family Residential District Margaret Mitchell, applicant Dr Mitchell was present Mr Fontaine noted this issue had been before the City Council previously The Council had granted a permit until March of 1998 Ms Mitchell explained that she did not practice in her home until August when an emergency situation arose that forced her to move the practice to her home She apologized for not appearing before the Planning Commission until this time She said she will not have an office manager contrary to what was indicated in the agenda packet She stated she would like to practice out of her home three days a week, two days a week from an office in the Cities Mr Rhemberger questioned whether the City Council had assumed authority in the matter, since the Council had reviewed the request and said there was no option for renewal of the temporary use it had granted Mr Weidner said if the applicant meets the standards for a conditional use permit, the permit cannot be denied Mr Fontaine noted that when the matter was heard before, the primary objection was the narrowness of the road Ms Mitchell's home is situated on and the proximity to a school and school bus stop Ms Mitchell responded that the road is a privately -owned road which she pays to have plowed, as indicated in a letter from the owner Nina Amundson She suggested that more 4 • Planning Commission Oct 12, 1998 traffic is generated because she has an eight -year -old son than is generated by her business, she only sees one patient every hour and one-half, she stated Marge Jordahl, 1115 Amundson Dr, spoke against the request She stated her concern about allowing the use in rental property on an unimproved road She said the business brings strangers into the neighborhood She stated she is opposed to setting a precedent of allowing commercial use in a single-family neighborhood, she added there is plenty of office space available for rent Ann Cummings, 1060 Amundson Dr, noted she has had to appear before the Planning Commission/City Council on three different occasions regarding this issue She remains concerned about kids using the street to get home from the bus stop She said she feels strongly that commercial use is not wanted in a residential neighborhood Rich Cummings, 1060 Amundson Dr and City Council member, noted that the primary reason the Council denied the permit was not because the Council is against commercialism, but because of the location of the home on an unimproved street He noted the Council granted Ms Mitchell an amount of time to find another location and now she is back with the request at "square one " The neighbors are concerned and object to the request, he stated • Also speaking in opposition was Shelly Michaelis, 1341 Dallager Court, who expressed a concern about the impact on property values, as well as the safety of the road, and Rick Coula, a neighbor, no address given, who reiterated a concern about safety Speaking in favor of the request were a neighbor, Bonnie Ramault, no address given, Gayle Panzino, who appeared before the Commission with a similar request earlier in the meeting, and two of Dr Mitchell's patients, Karen Kress and Joan Zeltman Mr Fontaine questioned whether this case represented a new request since the City Council had already made a decision Mr Russell responded that this was a new request The issue, Mr Russell said, is whether the use would generate more traffic that a strictly residential use Mr Zoller said since the permit had been denied by the Council previously, he didn't think the Planning Commission had the authority to rule on the request, he said he thought the matter needed an interpretation by the City Attorney Mr Weidner said he did not think the City Council could preclude the lawful use of the property as long as the use meets the criteria of the Home Business ordinance Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Zoller, moved to take no action and refer the matter to the City Council Mr Russell suggested amending the motion to refer the matter to the City Attorney for clarification due to the Council's previous action Mr Rhemberger and Mr Zoller agreed to amend the motion as suggested, motion failed 2-5, with Mr Rhemberger and Mr Zoller voting in the affirmative 5 Planning Commission • Oct 12, 1998 Mr Zoller moved to deny the request, motion died for lack of a second Mr Weidner, seconded by Mrs Bealka, moved to approve the request as conditioned Mr Russell suggested adding the condition that there be no non-resident employee as required by ordinance, Mr Weidner and Mrs Bealka agreed to add that condition Amended motion passed 5-2, with Mr Zoller and Mr Wald voting no Public Hearing on 62"d Street area plan Sheen Buss of Bonestroo, Rosene & Anderlik briefly reviewed the plan, highlighting storm water management, traffic circulation, land use, and parks and open space Jon Engelkmg, 1220 Nightingale Blvd, initially stated he was generally pleased with the plan He noted there had been some talk about the possibility of moving a green space area a little farther south Ms Buss said engineers will determine the exact location during feasibility studies Mary Jo Krenik, 1165 Nightingale, asked whether there had been any consideration given to a meter control gate for Brewers Pond Ms Buss responded there will be a control structures at the ponding areas, which should improve the water quality of Long Lake Ron Pinc, representing Mr and Mrs Sid White, owners of property at 6286 Stillwater Blvd, • asked that a two -acre parcel of property the Whites own along Stillwater Boulevard (Highway 5) be increased in density, to 18-20 units per acre, from the townhouse density as indicated in the plan Later in the discussion, Mr White asked that consideration be given to the request for increased density Tim Nolde, potential developer of the Whites' property, indicated a willingness to work with neighbors Richard Huelsmann, 12610 62"d St N , said he was satisfied with the proposed plan, but was surprised to hear of the proposed density change and would be opposed to any increased density He also stated he hopes that the cul-de-sac on 62"d Street will be constructed as soon as possible He also suggested that as part of the long-range plan, the two ponding areas south of 62"d Street and north of Highway 36 be included in the plan It was the consensus of members to add the future ponding areas to the plan Jon Engelking expressed his opposition to any increase in density, as did Phil Martin, 1018 Nightingale Blvd, a resident at 650 Nightingale, and Susan and Dan Whalen, 1180 Nightingale Blvd Art Junker, 1164 Parkwood Lane, asked about paths connections Ms Buss said the path/trail plans will be developed in more detail during the feasibility study Laurie Maher, 3018 Marine Circle, questioned the impact on the level of Long Lake if changes aren't made to the outlet at the north end of the lake Ms Buss and Mr Russell responded that • the AUAR is being followed 2 Planning Commission • Oct 12, 1998 0 0 David Green, council candidate from Ward 4, questioned the size of the proposed park/open space, spaces that are not accessible to residents as a whole, and suggested that in some instances it may be better to accept fees in lieu of park dedication Mr Fontaine closed the public hearing Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved to recommend approval of the plan as presented Motion passed unanimously Mr Wald moved to adjourn the meeting at 10 35 p in Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary I 7 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM • CASE NO SUP/98-68 Planning Commission Date November 9, 1998 Project Location 1513 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District Two -Family, Bluffland/Shoreland, Flood Plain District Zoning District RB Applicant's Name John G Hoeschler Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description A special use permit for construction of a parking lot and three -slip boat dock Discussion The request is for construction of a lighted 30-car parking lot, 20' x 20' deck area and three -slip boat dock Two slips are 30 feet and one slip is 65 feet in length The proposal is located on the banks of the St Croix River just north of the Stillwater Yacht Club The site is located in the Duplex Residential Bluffland/Shoreland and Flood Plain District • The dock construction will require DNR and Corp of Engineers approval In order to avoid a variance, the proposed deck would need to be at ground level If the deck is a structure, then the 100 foot river setback requirement would apply The applicant indicates in his plans that the surface of the parking lot would be of washed stone to allow water to infiltrate into the soil The washed stone would allow infiltration, but when compacted, may become impervious The Bluffland Shoreland regulations allow 20 percent of the site to be impervious As proposed about 50 percent of the site is impervious if the surface material does not allow runoff to be absorbed The application indicates three slips for one boat Staff is concerned about use of the other two slips and the possible impact on parking It is suggested that one slip in addition to the Lady Chateau slip be allowed for Lady Chateau related maintenance purposes only and not for hire or recreational use The proposal includes a grading plan with erosion control measures A grading permit is required by the City before any site alteration occurs The plan indicates a lilac and evergreen hedge to screen the parking from river view Rather than lilacs, native riparian bushes that create a natural buffer should be used No advertising signage is proposed directed toward the river River signage is not allowed in this district No water and sanitary sewer service is proposed Because the project is located in the Bluffland/Shoreland District, the following findings and • standards must be met (see attached Findings and Standards) This application has been submitted to the DNR for comments as required No comments have been received as of this • writing Recommendation Recommendation of approval to City Council as conditioned Conditions of Approval 1 The deck shall be either setback 100 feet from the rivers edge or located at natural grade 2 A landscape plan indicating native plant material that buffers the parking area from the river shall be submitted for approval to the Community Development Director before building permits are issued 3 The project site shall be enlarged to maintain the 20 percent impervious surface maximum or pervious material used to surface the lot acceptable to the City Engineer and DNR Hydrologist 4 The dock shall have two slips, one slip for Lady Chateau and a second slip for a service vessel No leasing or rental of the second slip or vessel This approval is for a 70 passenger maximum Lady Chateau and not transferrable without City approval 6 Any tent erected shall be located on the ground level deck and shall blend with the summer • vegetation color of the shore and vegetation 7 The Hydrologist's computations shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer 8 A grading permit with erosion control measures shall be approved by the City before any site alteration occurs 9 The landscaping shall be installed before operation of the business begins 10 There shall be no advertising directed to the St Croix River 11 A lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director before installation Lights shall be directed down with the source of light concealed 12 Any required Corp of Engineers and DNR approval shall be obtained before City building permits are issued 13 This special use permit shall be reviewed in one year after approval for conformance with conditions of approval Attachments Plans n so ZONING § 31 1 c Accessory uses in general Accessory v A landscaping plan that uses are all appurtenances assocu- minimizes the visual im- ated with and customanly inciden- pact of the proposed project tal to permitted uses as viewed from the nver d Conditional uses Conditional uses and that visually screens are as follows all parking areas from the 1 Conditional uses are not per- nver The applicant must nutted in the urban districts of provide the community the St Croix Riverway unless with a performance bond it is determined by the city coun- for the cost of all landscap- cil, after a public hearing, that ing to ensure compliance the proposed use will with the landscaping u Preserve the scenic and plans recreational resources of vi The project meets all zon- the St Croix Riverway, es- ing and subdivision re- pecially in regard to the quirements view from and use of the vu The project requires no al- nver, teration or fill of the shore - Maintain safe and health- line, blufiland or floodway ful conditions, or vuu No lighted or flashing signs ui Limit erosion potential of can face nverward the site 2 Conditional uses must meet, in The following Fisted urban dis- addition to the dimensional and tnct conditional uses are con - other requirements, the follow- sidered conditional uses, per - ing standards matted by conditional use u The proposed use must be permit consistent with the city u All lawful businesses, in - comprehensive and area cluding supermarkets plan and be comphmen- u Manufacture of baked tary to the existing and goods, provided not more adjacent land uses than five persons are em- u The side and front set- ployed in the business back requirements of the uuu Department stores local zoning ordinance uv Establishments for the sale ui A parlang layout and site of china, floor covenng, plan which provides onsite hardware, furniture, or off-street parking spaces household goods and ap- for all employees of the pliances, paint, wallpa- project, an exclusive area per, materials and objects for leasing docks where re- of interior decorating quired by local ordinance v Establishments for the sale and off-street customer of books, magazines, news- parkung spaces as required papers, tobacco products, by local ordinance drugs, flowers, gifts, mu - IV Onsite grading and sur- sic, photographic supplies, face water runoff plan for sporting goods and statio- the site that minimizes soul nery erosion and degrading of vi Eating places, lunchrooms, surface water quality restaurants and cafete- CD3145 51 Oct-12-98 02:45P P.02 Case No 61e 9 Date Filed Fee Paid • Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM FEE • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Condtonal or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee $70 $54L200 25 0 20 $500 300 $1004501lot 5100 *An escrow fee Is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant 1s responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (I e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 1s13 ;Rf b � Address of Project j N inMaStrut Assessor's Parcel No 21-030-20-41-0 Zoning District urn Description of Project 3mat ', ng ,n Da=king aa_rea, °I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I viall comply with the permit if it Is granted and used " Property Owner Frank & Elayne Aiple Representative John G Hoeschler Mailing Address 1513 N Main Street Mailing Address 1400 AT&T Tower, 901 Marquette Ave City - State - Zip Stillwater, MN 55082 City -State -Zip Mtnneapolis MN 55402 Telephone No--4 Telephone No (n)"ol 305- - )g6P(o : Iy19 ` Signature I '6-e_W '- u� Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area under 1 acre Height of Buildings Stones Feet Principal Accessory Revised September 16, 1998 Total building floor Area sq I t Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided John G. Hoeschler, P.A. • Attorney 1400 AT&T TOWER, 901 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3264 (612) 305-1466 (Fax) 305-1419 MEMO TO City of Stillwater c/o Steve Russell FROM John G Hoeschler Attorney for Rand oller and Elayne Aiple DATE October 23, 1998 RE Permission for Parking and Landing for Lady Chateau Overview Randy Boller is the owner and operator of the Lady Chateau cruise ship Elayne Aiple owns the St Croix shoreline north of the Mulberry Point Marina The Lady Chateau is presently docked at the Mulberry Point Manna and Mr Boller would like to relocate its docking and landing facilities about 600 feet north to property Mr Boller proposes to lease from Mrs Aiple This is a request to obtain permission from the City of Stillwater to allow this use on that land Lady Chateau Operation Mr Boller has operated the 70-foot Lady Chateau for more than 10 years out of Stillwater during the summer season as a private chartered cruise boat All passengers come as part of private groups for day trips on the St Croix After a reservation is made, maps are sent to the guests to direct them to the boat The boat can hold up to 70 passengers, but the groups are more typically 20-50 passengers in size An analysis of this past season's use pattern is attached During the winter the boat relocates to Florida for the same function The boat does not accept walk aboard passengers who are not part of a prebooked group Mr Boller would like to move his dock and landing operation to the Aiple property about 600 feet upstream from Mulberry Point Manna in order to provide more privacy and to avoid mixing traffic with other Mulberry Point users Aiple Property Mrs Aiple owns approximately 3300 feet of the riverfront land north of the Mulberry Point Manna with the railroad tracks and Highway 95 (Main Street) on her western border Her home is located on the northerly % of this property The southerly 800 feet of this land lies between the Mulberry Point Manna and her entry road and front gate off of State Highway 95 (1513 North Main Street) Mr Boller wishes • to lease approximately one acre in the north 250 feet of Mrs Aiple's southerly 800 feet Mrs Aiple is willing to lease the land to him as long as the following conditions are met City of Stillwater c/o Steve Russell • October 23, 1998 Page 2 1) The operation does not adversely change the character of her entry road off Highway 95 2) The use is only for a private group charter operation like that presently conducted by Mr Boller (Mrs Aiple does not want to see a public excursion operation or a public boat launch area) 3) The parking area is screened from her remaining property, the highway and the river by vegetation so that its presence is not obvious 4) Signage along North Main Street must be seasonal and rninimally necessary to inform guests of where to turn in No advertising signage will be allowed 5) The operation must be gated so that it cannot be used by others when the Lady Chateau is not present 6) The operation should lie lightly upon the land Mrs Aiple knows Mr Boller and believes lus use of the land directly south of her gate will make a good buffer between her and the commercial manna operation further to the south She is willing to lease the land to Mr Boller, but she does not wish to sell it and lose the control that ownership provides As between them, Mr Boller is responsible for all costs associated with this request and the construction 4p and operation of the leased area At the request of Mr Boller, Mrs Aiple joins in his request for the necessary City permission for the Lady Chateau land lease and operation on her land Proposal Mr Boller proposes to construct a three -slip dock, landing and parking area as shown on the attached plan prepared by Sunde Surveyors and Engineers The facility will involve principally a pervious parking lot (using washed stone — not class 5 gravel with a binder — to allow the majority of rain to soak into the ground where it falls) To the extent that there is runoff from the parking and driving area, it will drain either to the open Aiple land to the south or to a sedimentation pond on the north I The only structures on the property will be the landing, walkway and stairs and a 20 x 20 deck adjacent thereto where a tent shelter will be seasonally erected to protect waiting guests from rain The tent will be colored to blend with the vegetation The parking area is located more than 18 feet above the river level and behind a natural berm that will be enhanced with further soil and plantings The parking area will thus be below and behind the top of the riverbank The bank top will be planted with evergreens, lilacs and other leafy plants to screen the parking area from the river Where feasible, a tree spade will be used to transplant any quality trees and vegetation already on the site, but subject to removal to the top of the berm A natural buffer of existing vegetation screens the parking lot from Highway 95 on the west as well as from Mrs Aiple's home on the north and from the remaining Aiple property on the south This natural vegetation screen will not be removed If parts of it die off, Mr Boller will be required to replace it City of Stillwater c/o Steve Russell • October 23, 1998 Page 3 The parking area will be lit by fixtures that will not allow an obvious source of light to be seen from off the leased land It is anticipated that light poles will be located in the center of the leased area between the parking lot and the access roadway The dock, ramp and waiting area will be lit by domestic style down lights Clients of the Lady Chateau come and leave in clusters so that traffic on the access road tends to be one way The access road will be gated east of the tracks so that access to the leased land will not be allowed except when the Lady Chateau is present during the season Regulations The Stillwater Zoning Code classes the property as RB (two-family residential) The RB (like the RA -single family) zone allows a commercial use of the property with a Special Use Permit if it is not objectionable to the neighborhood The only neighbors to the leased property are Mrs Ample on the north and south (and the two marinas further to the north and south of her) and the NLnnesota Zephyr Dinner Train to the southwest The houses on the bluff several hundred feet above the site and beyond the railroad and highway are not part of this neighborhood The blu$lmne/shoreline ordinance does not allow more than 20% of the land within 100 feet of the river to be covered with impervious surface Therefore, both the deck and the parking area will be designed and constructed to allow water to substantially pass through into the ground beneath There is some spring seepage between the railroad and the access road within the leased area that will be allowed to follow its natural course southward into the unleased Ample property further south Runoff from the parking area will be collected in a sedimentation pond at the north end of the property The pond is sized to hold the runoff from a 2 5" rainfall event I Permission for the dock will be requested and obtained from the Corps of Engineers The Department of Natural Resources has been given preview notice of this proposal Summary Mrs Ample believes this is an attractive and appropriate river -related use for the leased property that provides her with a buffer from the more intensive manna use further to the south She wishes to continue to live in her home and, therefore, wants to keep control of the property by means of her rights and powers as landlord The dinner train has not proved to be a problem and she does not anticipate any conflicts between this use and it She, therefore, joins in Mr Boller's request for a special use permit and any other permission that may be necessary to allow her to enter into a lease to allow this use 9 0 • 9 0 y Chateau 2 612 430-2770 Ma 10/7198 (99 33 PM 1.Aa. A•q+e-p�tt 19 °18 l y% P / PASS e^,3e4. e0,4w1-5 J Pax Count 5/98 6/98 7/98 8/98 9/98 10/98 Total Percent 1-20 2 5 5 2 5 2 21 16% 21-30 2 9 10 16 6 3 46 35% 31-40 8 2 11 4 1 26 20% 41-50 1 4 4 9 2 20 15% 51-60 3 6 2 2 13 10% 61-70 1 1 1 1 4 3% Total 5 30 28 41 20 6 130 Percent 4% 23% 22% 32% 15% 5% R b 212 • • • LT +l4 / I I--_ \ AT A I ^..flVL / \ A !\f\ITI/'1A1 /'�VVI I IVI V I � I —�-- -- 7------------ I I A K A MAIN 57R££7 ST CROIX RIVER LAKE ST CROIX �... t n �� �1`r��'' .� ,, L ^f <.w '::;�,�: ,;_�t••..yf fib.•= �:'� - ,...^ � - - - - _, .as`1 r J''.. I�. r- :¢_ �': �,�,•,,•`. 'tit ► L: � -y -I +•, c ,.. _ t � F r �� s"'.r� -- +�` r! -�,�bi"� .r + .�",r�J 'r.. •+,o,�,_ +� Zt y't-";„ 7, ,� �' ��+i �: y� 't +' _ •�� - - �7"t��r�� ��-������ �_ e- �::',l �,`,�. . itir � � `� •}'. �r ,'Y r' . �- n � may_: � ..ram.'+_-_ � r, ate,, �.:,a�.- �y ;;� ,*�.4 %b� "'S,iG' �. I. �e•.{:-5,'��r"� �-,�'�+a� '-•+l' ��� . / .� �:11'" .�. �_ "�-� •..�f �_��` � .-,��-r:.__- _..�,_-� „r*''t' . 16 fq 7 F+�••+� ��+••�- �',r L ?1; s--�� r••s•+.r ����� -� .� 'e,r• ,. .�_�yr { +'.•. �j'f }�.c :.• , JT ,r,.r r .,' �ts_. ,%�--' ;s .�-- .--�4� s�f-'✓�'`r'"�.�`�� . _ '� .-tc- �_. '�sa: �:. ter-, - _�1. I,. � - �r ,r-1.���i_�,+G��,` � I - �• /�_.�;J. �`L�n:��i, :_ ..� �'. .v��,+ .% --���.,✓i!"� -��` '" �'c. - � ~+� -J ���+�. �?-Y•�.�_ -n /^i S,' �. �' _•' _— 'a , r'•I. So PT.- 4 ��,•_'�~�/ �,� ' r "I- y� , y r :��7+' � 4- • - *�i'� I 1 r�i. ` •' �r' _ '4. ' 'J +� .. ,� .�- �!r"i:�y�. S - �' - �!.. � _r:K��.� �.-��� ��.,L"'�t •S !.4 '�� •''' :: - _ y,�'1L'; +�'�1 4;,__,�yp �.. 4_.�a� �"� �;�.•_• a••.l ,•.\-% 1 .�•.: _ s— j�•,G,, .i'r _..I � ` _ �-�'•� :� =+-� - M,'.�I •• `�, �,�� 11 .�ri � � ;fir .. ^�'i�_�'r _ ter• • �. _ :1` _ �'" �b�= y` � -_ � ':S l��+:�.},1,���'i':����'�•.�7L'�r� n• fir- )�^Y�_=''-.�,�•� �• �fi .� 1. i' �J�N, S•-sY.:zi,.��7I .''. _`1�- '. aL a :f!' .r f .'�: �.n �A; .- ..r•7/._ �,y J 1 "/.. ��'A CFI,- ���{%!`t t _ ��•„-'�' '\y' J /!'S +' �,►-.(K-\`' �'/: - - 1.`_�•�•.i- JAl •.\• - 1 .1��' ^` .1� '�\`. '1 I I \ ., ��1}, �^w•_'i L \ \'��~ ' i �' • � �i- w •','-7 . ,,Y�1\� �� �f � ' V ! tti'-?'�C.. - /'^�• . � �"• J'tl ,-Rr� _'� =r'l i �� � ,..C- -" -w.'' . 'ii� - _. .�/a �.. �:, ;� r �:. y / ' -1 "�F;'� S' %rr- ..�' '!' YP •1 :" :d' ': „+y ;�`, \�_ • h~ R :.;' 1C -,�� \.,�` l . 1 r '��;'f�� .j r. .��1i_'��� 1• � •x' � _ ?.^�I„ y'n^/ �,', '`4 � ;v � �'�*'r�',' j S'�r�r.;•' .f "i�'��K-. '� •fi +•~�F ,QM y. r _ •CQ' !ti�7i71xr'3t�1�_j�r^{': ti c' „Kfr•„� •� - - ' .� �` ��.�- '.. .. w is � : ,r : .y �`'.�l�•��11.`�F>'k��ff( t � �+y r .r � +� . ,�. +- y '� 'r^- i. ,�. � ••f i - 'i �;--i ..�';.'`%•� � .I ,��,r 'F ++ii -�7 'g i � r f•• �r I �•q 1 8' f siC• l� '2 '+i � �!.0 •� 11J� ti ,y >L1• t• t G; j- '���. .� j 'r. rl. c, i' ,f�y�,�J:.i. •r.,r ' +,�� _ �' I� �ry � d '^�''j� , �I'I� �� •�� � rtil 4tl't �•r 1'r _:h �'3a,� I - :•• •�;.. �� �}.',F ti`:-i'"- r�,';tin. .. r�;•C{ - tom..,'. ..,�.it F 4'� M7Y� JSi IM MM 17 ` -�' !I fs'`?!` \ ♦'^s t^ �-:1 .,• .*�k'` I'i ,y. 11�ig tit �.�1M � .a � ^.}�' �C -� ,+;•? � ,. ;:i.r ,i i - I 'A :�j 66, r A,4 W 40. r A 60, w1v Ar t E6 'CF7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ♦.•� - ,.� 4 .) � •�_ 4 � �,- • x. iW-fit.{ ^� •z •' `�' Y,' � �.► - iwl. ! � a•�5�� ��;:� M ..''c'•�. c' .;• ; +�' - Ir7i"' { ' �/ � � •,y.' � y �.1. r, y� � 1 ��� r•-'r ..�. ,:+ '�':" s. �•�t "_r �S' ��"�3Ga �': _ -r ,3 .1 J'�_� �_ � , r �✓.Y � � .�..�. • i '_ s :.�. y �� e' n � r1'• .%r 1t l� ,,cyy�- y 1� �4` . •. •.. _ ••�i• •• atF� .r ~rw�. �; � 1 � 1.t.J .� '/I '•`2.x • .`.5�'C ,•vr r ,.+, ',. �: r'•,:y�.� ��`v: � a .�-���.•'!., t�S� -;r,� 1,� ;'�,-r �: hit w'�`y. -r • �lri". � � ^r, "•r ..` .,� `r,�i�j �,,.`�s Y - f 'a' -; j �i � � � .1 '11,j.. i ' •�}� jjj��� 'il •� ' .. ,',:�r.r.': ' _ ij c•,�,� ��f i. '' t .-•:I -_ t-.' - lq' oi1 Jt .T � I .�\•,•.'' .. ��_. A'�� r R,\ :,�-�'r, r�' ` ��,�� 4 _' - � _ ir��c�•.ra?j+� r..'`�1rii, tom. r :h =\_ ,.. , _ _ •�.• •.( .L �) r '.`'' .: -1..•� -,,, �+!'�„-i `y. ,►emIP s .�'_" r,,,,i'_�-.-.`Gt �,�• ♦ .s �.., - f =� .' � A• �. - .:x' ,.. �' �.sK�a ''.. .t{` � e, qw �: •'•.• .�.. .ff c �. r,�ltf'+`_;'�.-��. .� � t .r•. 1 •!t'1.�►y�'.4t�=� :;�, t;•'�� � r�ti. f' ',.,. �" �� �`: ;�� � r ' � �� �ct�;° E i�• . r.' i .� 4, �,ut `X"J. -64 •� c. �• YS, sy o `fir ! i. y�-," \.'i� '�_ 4.� w D -!" � .ti• r v. ++�c�1 F. r{�a! i' �'^f{�iJ�, ?s f�. •R� �. �.,�:� �L}��,!�!��3;r .1l• ,X +, r• i► �:�yy yet � �,�} IN �� 7,� +'A I,.' �Lx' � � : i't tvU��� � 1�1►"'� .1 •` :;iY� •�1,'+^ ��"F--:•�� �i�` � .,a. ,�.e�„N - :'���t� �'�'�.T' it' h, !`-; ".. �' +;��`r. ''�''"'• ��r'r:i. a� .yii'+�:�.+lw� _4t1�ti�� '� ,� S. t.. �+.v 'y1�l K'-��Y.�' �\. ��.,'. �[�•C�'sr• �. -�' �LL1i: �. .�� t. i ��•.:- .�.'r�� ���' .Y. :�~+r:�i.';'ti..�.,, fi!iw }aGGG?'�3�.�- 1? Ry +� nt' - •'S ��.i'��tir I .iw� `''�,'+' �' k1 j:.'i' te As Y_ t' „;. " •�; •� '=•;: •Y 1: ,. � fir.• �.�_ 't �y �. � ,r.. Lett' -tf ♦'�,i.. .:�'=�(9•t..� _ t •i. .t,--.�. ' .i : •ice. ti �. - .+c'CY.v, r } r?F�T� -,�.L..�'.�-- --s �:..;�r. ','�-"�"` `.,r.'le4„f`cTi�,�'Y sjF�.• .. ::k, J..-� - [ �J ice- _ .�•n�` 7 {,�` �?+ ` r :�C'• �� . '' /.ti_ i �- x Yy �l�,�.`�.,v�Y �>,Sa! .zv � � t`�f-•�J` r �i�i�t'r ' r f . � t� - , 1 r I ;; i E r ri � . � � a � i TrLJ+�'. � •- '.� � r , � L ` �-+e � t C a.� ''� ' , � � ,Aj�, arx � • I ^ 1= � 1 h � '+� 4 n : 1. 4 . l L 1. � � �r�` � iy� � �` L l�tl",���1 � ��F+ ._ h �`: �;5.. r T, � k. ^��� ;�� :�lY-� � n r 4� •-�(� + ,.. . .,,_ � �, �' 1r � � � ;;,a' -•1r� .r; r"ee ` �, '��',k ''•r �� +_ � ` • � •1� r.� �i'ti r ' 3` � �� .-A�'7y" k- • � • t x /r r -'� �i�� ��y�r i' � �1 _ 'l i «y�sr�F •}►� t ,� t - .,'r „ �.f� ��t, � •-J}�j'' e � �,� Lbw ,�{��?-.ti �T\r3 t `� �i4'c'•r,�i! i ; �rC •^� T r `a' •�' r�1 ,'+ }SJ�^ `a�;f+ ��� �� �,< �t �r 4 ''t�.� '+ � � 7 � � �' W �!� �� Y 1 �� i i` {.►gyp: K7v .,,gin,.},�ri '^` - �.:'•�r .rt �?`. • 'moo .. — -' _ �� Y��-� r��...:s_.�_ _ �` T ,�. ,.:r.!!�ti y"K�rr,/ 17':t ar'7 �: '•"IR'r- f �_ � �" i:'�•. _ r• r �.�,.f ��`.'<:vl'�*. !•.' {I y i vi i�. �`�'i'- �• �1 t �'4 ''���� �'�y��� F`~V15�ii'c�ti .i�'fC r' ��''a1.� �' e { - y '.Q ,.M•t,M�t�r ry4-iy �.�✓�' ���i, r.�. ��� � .i .�. elf ..� M���<��' S� �1L-'', �a!� `� � �l %+' •�' ,:>. �• '.�t•'. '�`� t ETiah �,ff"'f JI,F�'t�"P,•►f.`, ;��-•Kl�dr� � •`1 •'� T h- at. dt t`_kyi��uY�ty. C.. ?i .� rir';'•'� i 1•ir a �.� -.a 'i F. �� Fr: 1 �`' l} �� r' � ��,F'.��.•,�ry-,. r _�_ fl(�'i L rv..y'- f ra . '����,: ;?fir � . �,'� c.� �'�r �� a..: �L 4-�4r � �xf�'�� l.� y�� �/� • �. y .+ �•. .: F' 4. it ,r r . � "It.; ' i o , _ - IF, .may c• � � ',`ys•�t. a _Icr�ll: ..4 - .'a .a /'f �. ,� i •td Hi. �.: r ,� .�..:�t�.r � �. 4 t',''FS 4; � a4 �y� �y,. �� � �h. <. .•� I�lf�' N' _y. '!• �+•. v. :�,?s� Ly`G�lc.f �fca-,� r� .'.� r.;►, E'_�''+. r. ��,�\f.•� ]i l►�� �U4 ``, `��'"' .,- .f_1 /�^',•l' f.fy v. ;, r•F�.lS �,•-� �1 `, �.�,rnP fy. C; .�F s,' •��'� ,..•,• .G,.: n'-. -�,,, r {��. ;�, t SS � �� f �� �•;. :.r' �.,,� at = .''r•['' `y �' . '' ; •1: *' •� ��F +!'L ' '�,,t 'aT ' � y ' .� i '�c' _,+ �jh? y;, � .. f. +� o �.u.' �5+- •y* �' ,...ri :Jfin,f In '✓�r'+ri"'ir v -"a ` �'"� jt, rIv•�. r4'fi'+� -� a'•'�'... �:'aG .� r• 17'� 3 +'^ }. am `���,, {�5:. �Y 7 •- 1 r.l-.� .ti r `;�' t�� ' R'+. -.j 5��� �:.' .c• ^ ..v / } i tr f r •� 'u•,, ( ,�I`Fli: � � r�,..: c r „, ,'.� : W r rt•[- 1P, Y�'�S� • J- t r1�'_ s .r�-: 't M �' r ;J '' ?. a �_ �. -z �.7� ;: •7y" Ilff FILE COPY MEMO To Molley Shodeen, DNR From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Special Use Permit for Boller Family on Aiple Property North of Stillwater Yacht Club Date October 23, 1998 Enclosed is the application submittal information for a parking lot and boarding dock for an existing charter boat operation This item will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of November 9, 1998 Any comments you have should be submitted by November 4, 1998, so they can be considered by the Commission 11 0 LIN • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V98-70 Planning Commission Date November 9, 1998 Project Location 1234 Third Avenue South Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Erik W Ogren, representing Margaret A Ogren Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback (30 ft required, 28 5 ft requested) Discussion The request is for a 1 5 ft variance to construct a 8 ft by 10 ft screened in front porch The existing house is set back on the site far enough that adding the front porch would make it have about the same setback as the house directly north of it The porch will be architecturally compatible with the existing house Conditions of Approval 1 All materials match the existing house 2 Colors match the existing house Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan • Attachments Application Form/Elevation Drawings T 1, G �,ase No V Date Filed Fee Paid D Receipt No �i PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance 70 Conditional or Special Use Permit 50/200 Design Review 25 Planned Unit Development* 500 X Variance 70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* 500 Zoning Amendment* 300 Subdivision* $100+$50/lot Resubdivision 100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project /2 34 % " AVE S Assessor's Parcel No ?46_3191720a?.3 005;. Zoning District Description of Project 10OL-1-0 Li,eC ,9 11A.-z Ir4.j L�45 of 1 e S Fero y11 %pO�aLH "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner Representative pUoC--J Mailing Address PC S-1/2- Mailing Address 1609 City - State - Zip &T'ie-L z&jl�-rC-Z Mil/ SSOi;z City - State - Zip 5: is-ccy�9 /�-tN S'�c82 Telephone No &57 IS q / 9 Telephone No 6, 5 / L/3 4 /80 �- Signature Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions)13..? S x 72 S • Land Area 9 7 03 SOFT Height of Buildings Z Stones Feet Principal Accessory Total budding floor Area sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided _ Revised September 16, 1998 • • • "t 25 ,zs Z g ?cn b S 50 51 5+ 52 52 52 51 1 51 1 50 A 66 50 51 51 52 FOURTH AVENUE UTH FO ,� 30 33 � S o 0 4 �_ 1 �O 1 �N A �W AVENUE SOUTH THIRD 66 THm fi 59 89 ,a 138Z O Q V M 88 fl9 m �� J Co 135 � P,m, r\�o �� ,ate 10 SECOND AVE S all J0 3 a o A R 5o s/ s sz s2 sz� s1 s+ so J se 31 u w s, s, sz se sz 5+ 50 So 51 51 52 52 S? 51 50 i i`%j �j% so s, � sz u - u ..FROM C PHONE NO 4302922 Oct 28 1998 01 47PM P2 �1 SOLIID START Simgm ricon Stredgwer C*Uhv& Wln=G ton hortt• CCMOIMC( (910) 762-9875 ■ (800) 099 9105 I'OrtEY NevCda (702) 57&5700 - (800) 223-W7 LPI Joists ■ Gang-Lccn LVL ■ 'rinerZecd r�kn Board a EnVl aced StIAS CInd BOWdS ■ Vv`b0d-E Softwcxre _ Z I • r x S /+ JOB NAME !A44S C jg-�— JOB A LOCAMN HEFT OF SALESMAN DATE OCT-28-1998 12 35 4302922 97i P 02 .FROM C PHONE NO 4302922 Oct 28 1998 01 47PM P3 io 29/08 12 OS 'BOO 1',4 lzil STOCK LLMBER EkG 10001 G02 r SOLD START- Q9 sbmgrear doom st ht*r edlingL Wamingtcn North CmoL- = (910, 7624&76 a (800) 999 9106 Fernley Nevada (702) 57@ 570C ■ (830) 225 5647 LPI Zoists c Gang -Lam LVL ■ huie-r-Secri Ihm Bomrd a F*1Q1rA—.-iK7. Stua5 and. Bo=cls ■ JVoc-d-E Softwc3re E JOB NAME JOB # LOCATION SHEET OF • SALERAAN BY DATE .mac ro+ sn, OCT-28-1998 12 35 4302922 97i P 03 ,FROM C PHONE NO 4302922 Oct 28 1998 05 09PM P2 10/1S/}!b 11 JR VSL2 454 1'11 STOCK LLAB ER EAG Z 001 001 • SOLID START Wt=arQ*Qn V=th CMOLr= 91L7762 98 /8 • (800) 909 910: Fernley Navada (702) 575-6700 ■ (800) 223 5647 LPI Joists C-.=g-Lam LVL • hu1er-Send R1rr Bo�Yrc� En � r8d I oV -e S I 1 co ! l i I V7 I I I _ g Cy r� 5 � Studs cut B=ds ood}E Sof Ovule I I I 4� tl !� 1 JOB # LOCATION sHFET CP SALESMAN BY _ DATr ly161 ON Vy OCT-28-1998 15 57 4302922 97i P 02 I 0 MEMO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Comprehensive Plan Amendment Establishing a Greenway Corridors, Parks and Open Space and Trials Detailed Plan for the City Expansion Area (CPA/98-2) Date November 5, 1998 The Greenway Corridors, Trails and Open Space and Parks map has previously been reviewed by the City of Stillwater Parks Board, Open Space Committee, Joint board and Planning Commission All the review committees responded favorable to the development of a more detailed mapped interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan Natural Resource and Trails Policy Once the greenways corridor, trials and parks and open space map is adopted by the City it can be used to review projects and obtain trail easements/improvements and parks/open space dedications Briefly the Greenway Corridors, Trails and Open Space and Parks recognizes existing natural physical conditions, planned and existing trial systems, activity areas, City park dedication requirements and zoning regulations are used to identify areas as greenway corridors, trails and open space and parks areas Trails are located to link neighborhoods from north to south and east to west and to provide access to natural areas As can be seen on the map, the greenways follow wetlands, Brown's Creek and it tributaries and natural wooded areas A greenway designation along with required natural area buffers and building setbacks will help preserve these natural resources in the expansion area When the City adopted the AUAR for the expansion area, it called for the establishment of Greenway/Trail Corridors The adoption of this plan fulfills that requirement Recommendation Approval of Greenway Corridors, Trails and Open Space and Parks Plan Attachment Map 0 4B, .......WE .. _ZA.14 %h[WW _ will REFfi:;.4,L9.. � i io. 0 MEMO To Planning Commission From Steve Russell, Community Development Director Subject Zoning Ordinance Amendment Requiring Buffer Areas for Brown's Creek its Tributaries and Boundaries Case No ZAT/98-7 Date November 5, 1998 This amendment to the Shoreland Ordinance will required a 100 foot buffer area from Brown's Creek and its tributaries and a buffer area of 25 feet from wetlands The ordinance provides methods of protecting the buffer area from disruption and requires marking of the area The ordinance amendment will further the natural resources protection policy of the Comprehensive Plan and Expansion Area AUAR Mitigation Plan A draft ordinance has been referred to the DNR and Stillwater Township for review and comment Their comments have been addressed in this final draft ordinance 0 Recommendation Approval and recommendation to the City Council Attachment Shoreland Ordinance Amendment ZAT/98-7 0 Draft Shoreland Ordinance Amendment Wetland protection natural buffer zone (a) Scope of Application This section shall apply to any property included within any subdivision or building permit for which an application therefore was filed on or after the effective date of this section This section shall not apply to any of the following (1) Structures located within a wetland buffer zone on the effective date of this section or the remodeling, reconstruction or replacement of such structures provided that it does not take up additional land within the wetland buffer zone (2) The construction or maintenance of public drainage facilities temporary erosion control improvements (3) The construction or maintenance of public utilities, provided there is no other practical alternate location (4) The construction or maintenance of public or private trails provided the trail surface is not of impervious materials and the buffer zone is expanded, where possible, in width equal to the width of the trail, including disturbed areas (b) Wetland Buffer Zone Required On all public and private property which abuts a wetland, a wetland buffer zone shall be preserved or established and maintained in accordance with the following requirements (1) The wetland protective natural buffer zone shall mean the area between a line delineating the wetland edge and a line parallel to and upland one-half the distance of the required setback For Brown's Creek or tributaries of Brown's Creek, the buffer zone shall be 100 feet form the middle of the creek If a wetland is associated with the tributary, the required buffer area shall be 100 feet form the center line of the tributary or creek or 25 feet beyond the edge of the wetland which ever is greater (2) Any buffer zone that is to be preserved in a natural condition shall have the natural plant growth inspected and approved by the city (3) Any buffer zone that is disturbing shall be reestablished with natural plantings approved by the city, (4) A silt fence shall be installed and maintained protecting the buffer zone until land disturbing activities are complete and disturbed areas reestablished, (5) All subdivision applications shall have wetland delineated and buffer zones established 40 and required wetland building setbacks mapped (6) The owner or occupant of any property abutting any wetlands shall not conduct or permit any of the following activities within the wetland buffer zone without City approval I vegetation alteration, including clear -cutting, ii topographic alteration, including but not limited to grading, filling, excavation and extractions, iii construction, placement or installation of any structure, iv dumping or disposing of any material foreign to the natural state of the wetland, and (7) Land disturbing activity that is proposed outside of any established wetland buffer zone which may impact the buffer zone and/or wetland, shall required approval by the city before the activity begins (c) Wetland Buffer Zone Identified The wetland buffer zone shall be identified by permanent markers, approved by the city, at each lot line, but in no case more than 300 feet apart All markers shall be correctly installed prior to final plat approval 0 0 • MEMORANDUM To Planning Commission Fr Steve Russell Da November 4, 1998 Re Case No V/98-71 Attached is a letter from the applicant asking to reschedule the Variance request until the December 14, 1998 meeting 40 F 0 November 4, 1998 City of Stillwater Planning Commission 216 North Fourth St Stillwater, MN 55082 RE Case No V/98-71 This letter is in reference to the variance that I have requested The hearing for the variance is scheduled 11/9/98 when I will be out of the State Please reschedule my request for the next regularly scheduled meeting so that I can attend Very truly yours, qa,-�e4ei4 f, eT Gary S dbrod 123 Birchwood Drive Stillwater, MN 55082 • November 6, 1998 TO Mayor and City Council Planning Commission FROM Steve Russell (v Community Development Director SUBJECT Final PUD Approval for 35 Cottage lots as part of Phase I Legends Development PUD/98-69 BACKGROUND In January 1997 the preliminary plat and PUD concept plans were approved for the Legends development In June 1998 the final plat for the first phase (65 lots) of the Legends project was approved The first phase includes 15 lakeshore lots, 15 traditional lots and 35 cottage lots Because the traditional and lakeshore lots will be developed by custom home builders design review for conformance with Zoning regulations and design guidelines will be performed by planning staff when building permits are issued For the 35 cottage lots in the first phase of development, this final PUD review will serve as the final design review of the project Ryland Homes has purchased 35 cottage lots from the developer and has subntted the enclosed plan for design review Design review requirements and guidelines are found to the Cottage Residential Zoning District and Citv of Stillwater Phase I Expansion Area Design Guidelines Staff has met with the building and developer on three occasions to go over the City development requirements and to review their concept elevations The Cottage Residential (CR) Zoning Ordinance and selected sections of the Expansion Area Design Guidelines are enclosed for reference Staff and the City's design consultant toured a Ryland development in Maple Grove Comments on that project are also enclosed and are used to analyze the aspect of this project that are not shown in the submitted house front elevation drawings The intent of the Expansion Area Design Guidelines and Zoning Regulations are to, along with the streetscape improvement, provide a friendlier pedestrian oriented neighborhood with minimal automobile appearance 11 November 6 1998 The Zoning Ordinance has specific requirements for setback of garage as it relates to residential as listed below 25% of garages setback more than 6 feet from front of house 25% of garage setback a minimum of 2 feet from front of house 50% of garages may project as much as 6 feet in front of house half of that 50% must have living space above garage and half must have functional porches (6 feet wide or greater) From what was presented it is impossible to know how these setback requirements will be met To review garage setback for conformity the builder will have to present a plan that shows how the design of houses and location of garages will be situated or each house will require staff design review to ensure setbacks meet the requirements The Ryland submittal shows eight front elevations of homes No side or rear elevations are shown (refer to Tompton letter of August 4, 1998 for side and back house design concerns) You can not tell from the elevations how the house and garage will sit on the lot All the front loaded garages have living apace above the garages and all have porches The depth of the porch can not be determined from the drawings to make sure it is functional Other zoning requirements related to the front of the home requires the driveway to be 12 feet at street right-of-way and the design guidelines call for the front sidewalk to be connected to the front door of the home by a sidewalk These items are listed as conditions of approval A master development landscape plan and typical landscape plan are submitted The master landscape plan was approved as part of the final plat approval Additional street trees and rear property line trees have been added to relieve the view of the backs of the houses from the ends of the blocks Typical site landscaping has also been proposed The actual lot landscaping will use the City native, and recommended plant list and be installed before project occupancy Other design issues covered in the Tomten letter are roof color, front wainscoting, and shutter size Staff recommends a variety of shingle colors be used rather than one color If wainscoting is required to be carved around the residence sides, it will probably not occur The development had indicated that shutters are decorative not functional and the size can not be increased to t functional size The remaining 63 cottage lots will follow this first phase of Cottage Development With experience, the builder may want to add building designs to the selection Staff recommends that this can be accomplished administratively with staff review so long as Zoning requirements and design guidelines are met RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned with concept PUD approval Cottage Residential Zoning Requirements and Expansion Area Design Guidelines with the below listed Conditions of Approval 2 November 6 1998 1 The garage setback shall be reviewed by planning staff to ensure the percentage of garage setbacks are met 2 All driveways shall be 12 feet at the street right-of-way 3 All houses shall have a sidewalk running from the front entrance to the street 4 If any fencing materials is used it shall be the "Traditional" fence design approved for the traditional and lakeshore areas 5 Educational material shall be provided to all residents describing yard maintenance practices to minimize the impact on Long Lake 6 The city's native and recommended plant list shall be used for individual lot landscaping 7 Additional landscaping with "Theves poplar" shall be considered along rear property lines to screen and breakup backs of houses 8 The builder shall provide the City with the criteria for locating the various house elevations next to and across the street from each other to provide variety of design and color 9 A pallet of shingle colors (4) shall be used for roof color 10 Other similar floor plans and home elevation may be built as approved by the Community Development Director 11 The rear and sides of all residences shall have window openmgs 12 Outside mechanical equipment shall be screed or located from neighbor and public view 13 The site landscaping shall be in before residence occupancy 14 All front yards shall be sodded 15 The Declarations of Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements for the Legends project shall apply to the Ryland Cottage Development Attachment Application and Project Plan Memos from Roger Tomten, August 4 and November 4, 1998 Cottage District Zoning Regulations Expansion Area Design Guidelines Traditional Fence Design Poplar Tree Specification 3 • Temten Environments_I Design_ �5 � � �����r bT�� �..„��� �y .w nc � `�,„c�-r-r.rx�,,,�t�,->•—,L©�°', Y � �Y-a�y t �c �.f,�w. r � Y � �%� � ���.`�rr^„„-E�,�,:�+"^y�riP,� o :..,. 3an.r Y �.rtiu-,........n�— A 3-at'.1 .,,b-7aa� a- tit e+�,.+.L x.r-'" f..a3. y-Y ,1.�. ,.,.�:tZ,J•1n�a. E�a..t'.,ad ka'e,'n�-.s 51 Judd Street P O Box 272 Marine on St Croix MN 55047-0272 November 04, 1998 ❑ Phone 433-5600 Fax 433-5601 To Steve Russell, City of Stillwater Community Development Director Re The Legends of Stillwater "Cottage Lots", Final PUD Submittal by Ryland Homes Twin Cities I have reviewed the Final PUD Submittal regarding the above referenced project The first part of the review is based on the City of Stillwater Zoning Code, (specifically Ordinance No 854) The second part of the review is based on the amity of SbllwaterPhase One Wansion Area Design Guidehnes. and past discussions with Dan Herbst of Pemtom, and Wayne Soojian of Ryland Homes Twin Cities City of Stillwater Zoning Code, Ord # 854 • The Final PUD submittal illustrates three basic floor plans, each with various options for elevations and alternatives in the plan to provide variety to the streetscape The developer has briefly described the company policy relating to the disbursement of plans throughout the development The ordinance requires a mixture of plan types in the way the house and the garage relate to the street It is not clear whether the developers policy will also meet the city ordinance Further definition of the developer's internal policy or continued monitoring of plans will be required to ensure compliance with the ordinance The ordinance indicates a driveway width maximum of 12 feet The plans presented did not specifically address this item 11 The guidelines indicate a need to vary facades to provide visual interest to the neighborhood The developer is providing variety in terms of architectural elements (gables, roof massing, siding material, etc) and colors, however, they have indicated a single roofing material and color for all the homes This is not consistent with the intent of the guidelines to provide variety The number of roofing color options should be similar to the number of options for siding colors The guidelines indicate that in no case should a building facade consist of an unarticulated blank wall No information was submitted regarding the side or rear elevations of the houses, however, a concern was expressed in past meetings regarding blank side walls The developer has indicated that options for additional windows in the standard plan are permitted The developer should make every effort to eliminate blank walls on the model homes constructed, and could show options in 40 their marketing plans that show additional window placements to reduce blank walls • The Design Guidelines spend a fair amount of time discussing the importance of the garage -house -street relationship Regarding the number of front facing garages allowed on the streetscape, the guidelines are more stringent than the city ordinance It was hoped that the ordinance would represent a bare minimum of effort and the guidelines would be an achievable goal I am concerned that this submittal represents the bare minimum to meet the ordinance and would like to see another plan or two with fully recessed garages as defined by the design guidelines With the focus on trying to reduce the impact of the garage on the streetscape, the use of single garage doors in lieu of double -wide doors is encouraged This would not be as much of a factor for the plans that have fully recessed garages (not visible from the street) Some of the single garage doors presented in the submittal indicated grilles in the windows These seem unnecessary and emphasize a horizontal proportion in lieu of a desired vertical proportion The walkways should extend from the sidewalk or street to the front entry in lieu of from the front entry to the driveway This continues the emphasis on the front entry and the pedestrian, rather than the garage and the automobile The plan with the garage fully recessed behind the house most successfully resembles the intent of the guidelines in terms of the house -garage -street relationship Because of this, it would be appropriate to build one of the model homes using this plan Seeing as the corner lots have so much more visibility, and tend to set the stage for the entire block, it would seem appropriate to use this plan on all corner lots With slight plan or site modifications, this plan could even be used on comer lots designated as walk -out lots When changing siding materials, make the transitions at major facade elements (i a entire walls under porch roof, entire gable end wall, etc) Wainscots of masonry at only the front elevation are inappropriate Masonry piers supporting columns should be masonry all the way to grade (unless sitting on a concrete slab) Shutters should be sized to match the width of the entire window opening Do not use shutters on multiple window openings Elevations represented as MDL-2100 indicate a large picture widow unit at the front porch This unit should be broken into a smaller scale with a pair of double hung units or a grille pattern If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at 433-5600 Sincerely, ]�;— 35-w��� Roger Tomten Tomten Environmental Design Tomten Environmental Design s+ ` �Z iK3�v r r �� d f-'"7r +ram �^-,n �"i" ` ��,.� �ti t " :� �a�-�yti 4 �'��+?'"'�� � ,�y�'.y' -rr^ u'k�v �yi'�� •rat sr.�'r �s�'+=-''��.x�:�..��'.i� ir'��`'ia`�_..we.",�� t..et+?a ��a'tif'�Z'::� s,�-,,.®�+�� �x��-�. a t ���..ra �a..� cr^..... c.Y'� ��3's a3�.'°`'�•.t..n'% 51 Judd Street P O Box 272 Manne on St Croix MN 55047-0272 El Phone 433-5600 Fax 433-5601 August 04, 1998 On Thursday, July 30th 1998, Steve Russell (Community Development Director, City of Stillwater) and I visited Hidden Meadows in Maple Grove The purpose of the visit was to tour and view an existing residential development and the corresponding single family homes that have been built by Ryland Homes The following comments were made as they would relate to the proposed single family development, The Legends, in Stillwater • There was a general concern relating to the one blank side wall of the plans visited It was suggested that the models developed for The Legends incorporate options for windows or other elements on these elevations to break up the long blank exterior walls • It was noted that the units that were most successful at downplaying the garage, were the units with living space above the garage Equally as important was the use of similar siding and door colors to downplay the garage doors, as well as the absence of any roof "eyebrow" over the garage door The roof element especially seemed to accentuate the garage rather than downplay it • From an overall development standpoint it was noted that all roofing colors were the same at Hidden Meadows It was felt that allowing different roof colors woy)d be more successful at portraying a sense of diversity within the "cottage lots", and creating a greater sense of continuity within the entire development Regarding window grilles in the windows themselves, it was felt that the actual number of divisions in the glass was not as important as the final proportion of the division Most appropriate would be a division that produced a vertical or square proportion in lieu of a horizontal proportion Also, in keeping with the idea of treating all four sides of the house similarly, any grilles should be continued on all four sides of the house • It was noted that the abundance of walkout lots left a lot of unadorned three story facades on the interior of the blocks It was suggested that the landscaping plan look at ways to screen these imposing facades Perhaps strategically located mnnd rows of fast-growing vertical trees located at the back property line would be appropriate n LJ • There was a reinforcement of the idea of extending walkways from the front door to the street, in lieu of from the front door to the driveway This continues the emphasis on the front entry and the pedestrian, rather than the garage and the automobile There was a question about the lack of mailboxes at Hidden Meadows It was thought that at The Legends (where mailbox groupings of 2 to 4 were discussed) the design of the supports should reflect the design of other landscaping elements in the development (i a gazebo, entry signs and landscaping trellis) in lieu of utility elements (i a light poles and street sign poles) It was felt a more utilitarian, simple design was more appropriate for an element that will be repeated so often throughout the development • It was felt that further discussions regarding the grade and finish of vinyl siding may be required to reach a consensus However, it was felt that the exposure, or tap width, as seen in Hidden Meadows was acceptable If other widths are considered, a narrower exposure would be more in keeping with the vernacular of old Stillwater If there are any questions or comments, feel free to contact me Sincerely, 0 lz;�— ( 7� Roger Tomten Tomten Environmental Design cc Steve Russell Wayne Soojian, Ryland Homes Dan Herbst, The Pemtom Land Company 11 2 7 Rear yard House 25 feet Garage 3 feet 8 Frontage Requirement' 35 feet 5 Design Review Design Review is required for accessory dwelling units or duplex developments subject to Traditional Development Design Standards 'Seventy five percent of front facing garages must have the garage setback at least 6 feet from the front wall or porch line of house House and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for variety of garage types and locations (front loaded, side loaded and recessed) and front and exterior side house elevations 2Where two or more adjacent lots do not meet street frontage requirements, the driveways must be combined " 4 A new District is addEasf"Subdivision 11 CResidential District 1 Permitted ui a Residential District the following buildings and uses and their accessory buildings and uses are permitted a Dwelling houses each occupied by not more than one family and with a garage no larger than two (2) stalls b Parks, playgrounds, greens and other open space area 2 Permitted Uses with Special Use Permits In a Cottage Residenntial District, the following buildings and uses are permitted by Special Use Permit a Home occupations subject to all provisions of the Zoning Ordinance regulating home occupation 3 Accessory Uses No more than two accessory buildings, one private garage and one accessory building 90 square feet maximum may be located in a residential premises 0 � 1 4 Development Regulations a Area, setback and height regulations Provision Single Family 1 Maximum building height Main building 2 stones and 28 feet Garages 1 story and 20 feet 2 Average lot area (for PUD) 6,000 square feet 3 Minimum lot width 50 feet 4 Minimum lot depth NA 5 Minimum front yard requirements Front yard House 15 feet Front yard garage (front facing)' 20 feet Front yard garage (side facing) 15 feet 6 Side yard Interior House 5 feet Garage 5 feet Corner House 15 feet Garage 15 feet 7 Rear yard House 25 feet Garage 3 feet 8 Frontage Requirement' 30 feet 9 Driveway width maximum 12 feet 'A minimum of 25 percent of lots must have garages completely recessed (more than 6 feet from front of building), a minimum of 25 percent of lots must have garages setback 2 feet oilmore and a maximum of 50 percent of garages may project a maximum of 6 feet out from the front wall of the residence Of that 50 percent, 25 percent must have habitable space above the garage and 25 percent must have front porches extending m front of the residence House and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for variety of garage types and locations (front loaded, side loaded and recessed) and front and exterior side house elevations 'Where two or more adjacent lots do not meet street frontage requirements, the driveways must be combined " 2 Ity of Stillwater Expansion Area • Phase One • G Guidelines BUILDING Residential Building Facades -Building facades shall be vaned and articulated to provide visual Interest to the neighborhood ,The primary residential entry and frequent window openings should face the street Front porches, bays and balconies are charactensbc of Stillwater's existing housing stock -In no case shall a building facade consist of an unarticulated blank wall or a series of garage doors -,Provide main floor elevation that is raised 2 to 3 feet above the street elevation Split entry or split foyer plans are inappropriate -Provide a minimum of 501/6 of residences with a functional front porch (Minimum 6 feet deep) oriented to the street. 0 City of Stillwater Expansion Area • Phase One Design Guidelines 0 SITE Residential Garages -Garages shall be positioned to reduce their visual impact on the street, this allows the active, visually interesting features of each house to dominate the streetscape -Garages may be sited in several ways In the rear, accessed from an alley, from shared drives off an alley, from a segmented alley, or shared driveways from the street. STREET STREE T 8 City of Stillwater Expansion Area • Phase One • Design Guidelines E • -By recessing garages, more active living areas can overlook the street, allowing residents to keep a watchful eye on playing children and participate in neighborhood activity Methods of recessing garages •Fully Recessed (i a set back from the Front Loaded, Side Loaded front of the house a minimum of V2 the depth of the house) For every four fully recessed garaged, one front loaded garage is allowed, provided that H 1 The garage is set back a min of 6 feet from the face of the house or porch 2 The width of the house face to the " street is 140% the width of the garage 3 Dormers or other architectural elements are used to break up the mass of the roof line 4 A 60 foot min lot width is provided 5 Other front loaded designs are not adjacent or directly across the street �--- HouSE � House i For every four fully recessed garages, o L� one side loaded garage is allowed, , ,. provided that . 1 A 60 foot min lot width is provided 2 Dormers, bays and other architectural o elements are used to break up the mass of the garage wall and the roof line qJ v ti ► ' 11 —Ai' 98 1� 0�0 -SIGN FORUM INC t� Yorkshire Tradlotimonal B ufftecb's Traditional style fence is durable yet ekMi It gates an ambience of nostalgic style combated with good old fashioned American erafmmanehip Maintenance fin vinyl is nnper►icus to weather, thus it will never chip fade crack Of (Ot. It never Deed, pauiting allowing you to enjoy its damcal appearance year after year Buff cchs wide seleaton allows you to choose a fence to meet your needs See the chart below to seloa the picket width type and spacing you prefer to addition to straight or concave Select the style of your choice r t ' I Colonial Mi—L7L- = j L nn r ~ � i J a IL Hudson (Concave) iVIREtets er`>r'tieclion i itkel ize int a icice� vinte p' o ar �p i1e13 kk gM� Cowve ancave All TradltrOnal styles are available in white only Picket Styles Available 1 Pinched' Pentad -Dog &e Picket Cal) Cap November 6, 1998 Poplar Tree for Screening Hedge Populus nigra "Afgharnca° Theves Poplar 5 — 6 ft high Height 50 — 60' Foliage Deep green Spread 8 —10 ' Fall Foliage Insignificant Shape Spire -like Zone 2 Fast growing, spire -like Longer lived and more disease free than Lombardy Poplar 0 0 Case No POD I -10 — 1 Date Filed lord Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance 70 Conditional or Special Use Permit 50/200 Design Review 25 Planned Unit Development* 500 Variance 70 200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* 500 Zoning Amendment* 300 Subdivision* $100+$50/lot Resubdivision 100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application All supporting material (i e , photos, sketches, etc ) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Protect 7mE opL !�rrt c.` war,gi2 Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District Description of Protect q S a21%&,CeE GoTs wrT�r� _FC,✓ds axm Aliz_c_ &.✓Arrm�eS i0a0_ "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify / will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner 1214 Lei n JLm E,Representative Mailing Address 900 Aearyf 7qeA Sl' SarTr, /01 Mailing Address City - State - Zip City - State - Zip Telephone No Signature Lot Size (dimensions) &o' x 132 AveFs k-& , Land Area _ %ow >;,G iyjk,s„�,,,E Height of Buildings Stones -L Feet Principal Accessory Revised September 16 1998 �v Telephone No Signature CT DESCRIPTION Total building floor Areai6an ro zy,,P�o sq ft Existing Alk sq ft Proposed wit" sq ft Paved Impervious Area N.-a•✓5 Number of off street parking spaces provided .AmeKD