Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-04-13 CPC Packet(Stiliwater T PLIVNNINGTOMMISSION J CITY OF STILLWATER NOTICE OF MEETING The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, Apnl 13, 1998, at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street Approval of Minutes of March 9, 1997 AGENDA 1 Case No ZAT/96-4 A zoning text amendment changing the regulations regarding Home Occupation Permits, Type I, II and III City of Stillwater, applicant 2 Case No V/98-15 A vanance to the sideyard setback (2 8 feet requested, 7 8 feet required) for the construction of a garage with studio living space above at 1213 Fifth Ave So in the RB Two Fanuly Residential District Karl Nickeson-Ranum, applicant 3 Case No SUP/98-16 A special use penmt for a heating and air conditioning business from a residence at 1148 Parkwood Lane in the AP, Agricultural Preservation District David Krmkie, applicant • Case No SUP/DR/98-17 A special use permit to utilize the existing studio apartment as an additional bed and breakfast room at 626 North Fourth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Arthur and Elaine Halbardier, applicant 5 Case No V/98-18 A vanance to the side yard setback (10 ft requested, 20 ft required) for the construction of a 55 ft x 55 ft two-story classroom addition and a 50 ft x 70 ft ambulatory addition at 214 Third Street North in the PA, Pubhc Admuustrative Offices District James Whipkey and Bob Ayres representing Ascension Episcopal Church, applicant 6 Case No V/98-19 A variance to the sideyard setback (28 ft requested, 30 ft required) for the construction of a second stall to their garage at 709 West Willard Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District Robert and Lorene Bourne, applicant 7 Case No V/98-20 A vanance to the front yard setback (0 ft requested, 30 feet required) for the addition of a 3- foot catwalk to the north side of residence in conjunction with a deck at 911 Fifth Avenue South in the RB, Two Family Residential District Richard E McClain, applicant 8 Case No V/DR/98-23 A vanance to the sign ordinance for additional signage (3) at 14200 60th Street North in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Doug Lanham, Famous Dave's of Amenca, Inc , applicant Other Items - Discussion of Lakeview Hospital Parking CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 • • • Planning Commission March 9, 1998 Present Jerry Fontaine, chairperson Russ Hultman, John Rhemberger, Darwin Wald, Tom Weidner and Terry Zoller Absent Glenna Bealka, Kirk Roetman and Don Valsvik Others Steve Russell, Community Development Director Mr Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p m Approval of minutes Mr Hultman, seconded by Mr Rhemberger, moved approval of the minutes of Feb 9, 1998, all in favor Case No SUB/98-9 A resubdivision of Lot 6, Block 14, Holcombe's Addition Case No SUB/98-12 A resubdivision of Lot 5, Block 14, Holcombe's Addition Case No SV/98-13 Vacation of the east half of South Everett Street bounded on the north by the south line of West Anderson Street and bounded on the south by a line from the southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 14, Holcombe's Addition to the west lot of said Lot 6 Timothy J Freeman, Folz, Freeman, Dupray & Associates, Inc , representing applicants James Finnegan, 819 W Anderson St , Mark McGrorty, 813 W Anderson St , and Tom O'Bnen, 823 W Anderson St Mr Freeman explained the requests were prompted when a discrepancy m property lines was discovered when drawing up a legal descnption for McGrortys to sell their property He said the new legal descnptions reflect where the property owners currently are "mowing to" and maintaining as their property The new descnptions bnng the parcels closer into conformance with lot size requirements, he said All of the property owners are in agreement, the property owners were in attendance and all attested to that fact Mr Weidner asked if other property descnptions are in error Mr Freeman said he would "speculate" that it was an isolated problem involving these three property owners Mr Weidner also noted that in street vacations, property owners on each side of the street get half of the vacated property, rather than as proposed in this request It was noted that City Attorney David Magnuson could resolve that issue Mr Weidner also raised a question about the city engineer's condition of approval regarding the street vacation — that the west property line be located 10 feet west of the existing property line Mr Weidner and Mr Freeman suggested the intent is that the property line be located 15 feet west of the existing property line, subject to a five foot easement Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval of SUB/98-9, all in favor Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved approval of SUB/98-12, all in favor Mr Rhemberger moved approval of SV/98-13 subject to the city engineer's condition of approval Mr Weidner asked that the condition of approval state the vacation of 15 feet west of 1 • • • the existing property line, subject to a five-foot easement Mr Rhemberger accepted the amendment to his motion Mr Weidner seconded the motion, motion passed unanimously Case No V/98-10 A vanance for relocation and expansion of a second residential unit on an 8,302 square foot lot (10,000 square feet required) in the RB Duplex Residential distnct at 216 W Wilkins St Marcia Kilbourne, applicant Ms Kilbourne was present She objected to the conditions of approval relating to grading/drainage She said she was not doing any excavation of the lot Mr Russell said that such a condition is standard procedure if the applicant is putting soil against the wall as shown in submitted plans Mr Russell suggested removing condition of approval No 3, since it is repetitive, and adding language "if grading is proposed" to condition of approval No 5 Ms Kilbourne explained that due to water problems, the duplex unit was moved from the basement, and a new unit constructed behind the garage The basement will now be used as a family room Mr Zoller asked why a vanance is required Mr Russell said a vanance is needed since the request involves enlarging/intensifying a non -conforming use, specifically increasing the duplex unit from one to three bedrooms The main point of discussion centered on the fact that building permits have been issued for the project Ms Kilbourne stated that she had the permits and was not told that a vanance was needed Mr Weidner said the only issue for the Planning Commission to consider is whether to allow expansion of a nonconforming use The issue of the applicant being granted building permits and not advised that a variance was required is an issue for the City Council to deal with, he said Mr Wald said the problem is not the applicant's fault — she is caught in the middle Mr Zoller moved to approve case No V/98-10, elimmatmg condition of approval No 3 and adding language "if grading is proposed" to condition of approval No 5 (No 4), Mr Zoller said he was making his motion of approval based on the hardship created by the water problem and the fact that a duplex existed before Mr Rhemberger seconded the motion Motion passed 4-2, with Mr Weidner and Mr Fontaine voting no Case No V/98-11 A vanance request for reduction of a drainage/utility easement to accommodate construction of a swimming pool in the rear yard of a single-family residence at 263 Pinendge Lane in the RA Single Family Residential District Todd and Kristine Wilson, applicants Mr Wilson was present He explained that the vanance request does not just pertain to the pool, the requested vanance is needed to allow the Wilsons to utilize their backyard He said when they signed the purchase agreement there was no mention made of a conservation easement, the 2 • • • Wilsons thought the easement on the property was a typical utility/drainage easement The request is to fill 25 percent of the easement and place a drainage system under the fill Mr Wilson said if he had been told there was a conservation easement on the property, he never would have purchased the property Signe Cowan, Crestwood Terrace, stated neighbors were very concerned about protecting the wetlands when the development was proposed and worked hard to obtain protection measures Mr Zoller also pointed out that the City Council made an agreement with Trailhead Development Co to obtain the wetland protection measures Members suggested that Mr Wilson's real issue was with the developers Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Hultman, moved to deny the request, motion passed unanimously Other business Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved approval of the revisions to the draft Home Occupation Ordinance, motion passed unanimously It was agreed to schedule a public heanng on the proposed ordinance for the Apnl Planning Commission meeting Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Wald, moved to adjourn the meeting at 9 p m Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 3 • • MEMORANDUM • • TO Planning Commission FR Steve Russell, Community Development Director DA Apnl 9, 1998 RE Public Hearing on Home Occupation Use Permits - ZAT/97-5 This draft ordinance has previously been reviewed by the Commission The current regulations are very open and subjective without specific requirements to assure protection for residential areas (existing regulations attached in memo dated 9-4-96) The new draft regulations estabhsh three types of home occupation use permits Type one is allowed in the residential RA, LR, TR, CR and RB distncts No special review is required The Type I home occupation should be invisible to the residential area Type II and Type III home occupations use require conditional use permits (a public heanng) and have specific limits to the operation Type III use is allowed in the RB distnct In the Type III distnct, one nonresidential employee is allowed and retail sales accessory to the business are permitted To pubhze this item, an article was written for the paper Recommendation Hold a public heanng, hear comments, discuss, make appropnate changes and recommend to the City Council for adoption Attachment Draft Home Occupation Use Permit Ordinance 1 Type I Allowed in RA, LR, TR, CR or RB Zoning Distncts 1 No permit required 1 2 Registration required 3 No outside storage or display of 2 products, equipment or merchandise is permitted 3 4 No retail sales are permitted from the premises 5 No traffic shall be allowed which is greater than 4 that level normal expected within residential areas 6 No separate business entrance 7 No signs are permitted 8 No more than fifteen (15) percent of the total gross floor area of the dwelling unit may be used for the home occupation or 300 sq ft whichever is less 9 No activity or equipment shall be used which creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors, 9 electncal or television interference that is detectable to normal senses outside the dwelling unit or any accessory structure 10 Home occupation reviewed upon complaint 10 11 12 13 Home Occui Type II Allowed in RA, LR, TR or CR w Home occupation use permit and No outside storage or display of equipment or merchandise perm] Any retail sales limited to access occupation Infrequent hobby, craft or art sal maximum not to exceed 6 days 1 5 Customers by appointment only 6 Off-street parking required for a 7 No signs are permitted 8 No more than 20% of the reside maximum used for home occup, No activity or equipment shall t noise, vibration, glare, fumes, of television interference detectabl from the dwelling unit or any ac lam - 8 p m business hours h No nonresident employees No excessive traffic Home occupation reviewed upo • • • . N. MEMORANDUM iiPlanning Commission FR Steve Russell, Community Development Director DA September 4, 1996 RE REVIEW OF SINGLE FAMILY, RA AND DUPLEX, RB ZONING REGULATIONS The RA and RB Single Family and Duplex Zoning regulations allow certain types of commercial uses The uses are listed below The complete regulations are attached RA - permitted uses a Hospitals, nursing homes and resthomes b Public and private primary and secondary schools including accessory buildings and uses located upon property contiguous to that occupied by the main building or buildings c Cemetenes d Churches and other places of worship e Within a main building, the office of a surgeon, physician, clergymen, architect, engineer, attorney, similar professional person or licensed personal service practitioner who resides in the main building and employs • in the office not more than one nonresident office or laboratory assistant f Other commercial uses found not to be objectionable to the neighborhood in which they are proposed to located RB - permitted uses c Customary home occupations carried on for gain in the main building, provided that no nonresident help is employed for the purpose, no more than 25 percent of the total floor space of the building is used for the purpose, no articles offered for sale shall be displayed so as to be visible from any street and only articles made upon the premises shall be sold or offered for sale thereon Special Use Permit a All building and uses permitted by special permit in a One Family Distract as set forth in Subd 11(2) b Local retail businesses, of the "corner store" variety, normally required for the daily needs of the residents of the locality, such as establishments for sale of dairy products, delicatessen, fruits, vegetables, groceries meats and other convenience items, provided that provision be made for loading space c Multi -Family Dwellings d Bed and Breakfast establishments SEE CHAPTER 31 01 SUBD 25(1)(f) its recommended that the commission consider revising the regulation to further limit certain commercial uses in residential areas v PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/98y915 Planning Commission Date Apnl 13, 1998 Project Location 1213 5th Ave South Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicant's Name Karl Nickeson-Ranum Type of Application Variance Project Description Vanance to the side yard setback (7 8 feet required, 5 feet requested) Discussion The request is for a second accessory dwelling unit m the RB district The lot contains +10,300 square feet This unit size would be 26' x 30' or 780 square feet The garage location does not meet side yard setback requirements Seven feet, eight niches is required, 5 feet is proposed It appears from the plans other accessory unit RB requirements are met • If the Planning Commission approves the vanance, the Hentage Preservation Commission will have to review the project design before a building permit is issued Recommendation Denial - Does not meet requirements of Zonmg Ordinance Required Findings for Vanance Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the vanance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachment Application • • Case No V Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* xx Vanance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $500 $70/200 $500 $300 $1 00+$50/lot $100 S70.00 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engrneenng fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 1 71 1- 5 th Av s Assessor's Parcel No Zoning District RB Description of Project New 2 Car Garage (26 X 30) W/ Efficiency Studio Apt Above (Detachtd) "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Karl M and Michelle R Property Owner Nickeson-Ranum Representative Karl M Nickeson-Ranum Mailing Address 1213 5th Av S 55082 Mailing Address 1213 5th Av S 55082 Telephone No 612 430 12.4 Telephone No ' ` y6124 .1 4143 it/WiMi ///�,, "Mgr . Signature � APM.FRAWirriii,. Signature E AND PROJECT DESC PTION Lot Size • imensions) 7 8 _1 x 13 2 .4 9 Land Area 10 , 356 SF Height of Buildings Stones 2 Principal Accessory Feet 35+ Total building floor Area 780 sq ft Existing o sq ft Proposed 780 sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft 1 5 26 Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 1 • • • ORDINANCE NO 850 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain 1 Amending The Stillwater City Code Chapter 31, Zoning, Subd 12(4) is renumbered Chapter 31, Subd 12(5) Development Regulations a A new Chapter 31, Zomng Subd 12(4) is adopted that will hereafter read as follows "(4) Accessory Dwelling Unit An accessory dwelling unit is defined as a second dwelling unit on one lot, detached from a primary single family residence and clearly secondary to a pnmary residence (a) Accessory Dwelling units are Permitted Special Uses in the RB District subject to the following regulations 1 Lot size must be at least 10,000 square feet, 2 May be located on second floor above the garage, 3 The accessory dwelling unit must abide by the primary structure setbacks for side and rear setbacks, 4 The accessory dwelling must be located in the rear yard of the primary residence or be setback from the front of the lot beyond the midpoint of the pnmary residence, 5 Off-street parking requirements for an apartment and single family residence (4 spaces) must be provided, 6 Maximum size of accessory dwelling is 800 square feet, 7 The application requires Design Review for consistency with the pnmary unit in design, detailing and matenals, 8 The height may not exceed that of the pnmary residence, and 9 Both the pnmary and accessory dwelling unit must be connected to municipal sewer and water services and be located on an improved public street " 2 Savings In all other ways the City Code will remain in full force and effect 3 Effective Date This Ordinance will be effective after its passage and publication according to law S S S 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 a W " Z ga 8 8 132 EAST 132 132 132 6 6 132 132 6 6 8 18 1 02 116 • DUBUQUE STREET 132 132 02 8 18 1 • 8 - 6 6 • 18 06 17 — 2 a " 17 2 .7,7 " --1-- " m71A W 06 06 16 3 16 —_ 3 Z n 116q p �10 �'n CI 815 04 4 a4'a p p444 15 14 Om 15 9.5 14 14 5 14 13 9 q x 8 8 DI DIm 3 m6 q 8 13 6 sees seas sofa p 1 3 rai 12 014 11 7 33 8 10 IAA 8 9 N71) 132 66 8 9 13116 132 EAST mm 132 132 18 1 17 2 16 3 15 4 14 7 5 13 6 12 7 11 8 Ohl 132 132 VACATED PER BK • DEEDS PG 404 132 132 8 18 17 2 W pz 9 t 66 07 7 12 it 11 101619 10 ri BURLINGTON STREET 132 8 1188 "— 17 11 132 4148 2 " wet 16 Oa 3 d pita 4 q 04 \/a. \ , 5 PI ) CI13 6 CI n 12 06 7 8 es 1 8 8 PA; 'O 9 Si 1 2 132 EAST ST LOUIS 66 • • 132 1R 16 3 15 4 p�p 14 6 p 14 3 Y 6 p yak ,2 7 Location Map 8 5 4 p u2 18 06 17 006 16 04 14 • 13 u�A 12 04 11 STREET 15 66 8 ▪ 17 ▪ n 9 m� p 9 14 6 O LL 8 VACATED PER BK 5 4 R2IW R2OW R19W R72W 1221W RN)W Vicinity Map T 0 166 Scale in Feet 11 dn.,pn mud el.e.pra or.* or .e record. they seem moos Orire moan County offs The sin*. Yard to easel et :Wenzel. Tenses rent ww(pwCaney . w.1 -.m..p.. Is w 1mmur.ra Sw= W d.gai Cana n.n... ont. An..1,1 2) op.. p 9 10 9 10 V.rty * anent dews. F.bu.ry 70. a. • • • ALBERT E RANUM KARL M RANUM ERIC J RANUM RANUM LAW OFFICES P A. 104 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 March 25, 1998 Stillwater City Planning Commission Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 RE: Variance Request N.ickeson-Ranum 1213 Fifth Avenue South Stillwater MN 55082 Dear Sirs and Madam TELEPHONE (612) 439 4143 This correspondence is in relation to the above -referenced and previously submitted variance request for property located at 1213 Fifth Avenue South, Stillwater, MN 55082 The existing request is for a variance to the side yard requirement Based upon a conversation with Mr Russell, the City of Stillwater Director of Community Development, this correspondence is designed to amend the variance request previously submitted At the time of the submission of my last request, it was my understanding that the side yard requirements did require a 10 foot side yard set back for our construction of a proposed garage with studio living space above Our request is for a variance to allow a five foot side yard set back Subsequent to that request, Mr Russell indicated to me that it was his belief that a proper interpretation of the ordinances for the City of Stillwater would find that our construction consists of a second "single family" unit and that, therefore, the existing ordinance requires either a 10 foot side yard set back or 10 percent of the lot frontage Our lot frontage is 78 0 feet and, therefore, our required side yard set back would be 7 8 feet Accordingly, it is my request and the purpose of this correspondence to amend the contents of my variance request from a request for a variance of five feet (10 feet reduced to five feet) to a variance request of 2 8 feet (7 8 feet required to requested 5 0 feet) We have also consulted again with our architect regarding the issue of reducing the project 2 8 feet in size and he assures me that given the clear spans across the front of the structure necessary for the garage door and the utility door, that 26 feet is the minimum workable size in order to construct the necessary and structurally minimum sized vertical load bearing walls r • • • Stillwater City Planning Commission March 25, 1998 Page 2 Again, the minimum separation between the proposed structure and the nearest adjacent structure on the neighbor's property to the South remains in excess of 22 0 feet if the reduction to side yard set back of 5 0 feet is granted Very truly you RANUM LAW O F CES, P A Ka KMR lmw • • • RANUM LAW OFFICES P A. iO4 NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 ALBERT E RANUM KARL M RANUM ERIC J RANUM Stillwater City Planning Commission Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 RE Variance Request Nickeson-Ranum 1213 Fifth Avenue South Stillwater MN 55082 Dear Sirs and Madam TELEPHONE (612) 439 4143 February 24, 1998 Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 This correspondence is intended to accompany the Request For Vanance of Karl M and Michelle R Nickeson-Ranum for property located at 1213 Fifth Avenue South, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 The request is for variance to the side yard requirements wherein a 10 foot side yard set back is required for construction of our proposed garage with studio living space above and a five foot side yard set back is requested through this variance process As you may recall, in order to maximize and utilize the present "RB" zoning assignment of our property at 1213 Fifth Avenue South, we did design and hoped to build a garage with an efficiency or studio apartment above for rental purposes Since we are in a two farmly district and met the rmmmum requirements for lot size, off street parking availability, size accommodations for livable space, exterior design requirements and height restnctions, among other things, the Planning Commission did approve our concept and request and forwarded recommendations of approval and amendment of the existing Stillwater ordinances, redefuung the same and allowing construction of our project as proposed Our problem arose upon the final review of our plans with our architect and a review of the survey of our property As you can see by the site plan submitted with this application, we have approximately 36 2 feet between the existing dwelling on the property and the south lire of Lot 14, constituting the space available for side yard between the existing dwelling and the south boundary line of the property The proposed garage is 26 feet wide by 30 feet deep It was our initial belief that sufficient side yard space existed to locate the proposed garage in a detached fashion between the existing dwelling and the south boundary hne while leaving a minimum separation between the garage and the house of not less than 5 0 feet A close review of the distance available to us shows that m order to maintain a five foot separation between the existing dwelling and the proposed construction, we must reduce our side yard separation from the proposed construction to the south boundary line of our property from 10 0 feet to 5 2 feet We have considered reducing the size of the proposed construction but our architect assures us that we are looking at the very minimum of feasibly rentable size at its present size of 780 square feet • • • Stillwater City Planning Commission Community Development Department February 24, 1998 Page 2 We have also considered the possibility of connecting the proposed construction to the existing dwelling but have found the cost to be exorbitant and histoncally not within keeping of the styles of construction of garage and homes m this neighborhood We have also looked at the site plan with an eye towards locating the garage farther back on the lot but with the existing deck on the back of the property, it proves impossible to locate the garage far enough back without running afoul of the rear yard set back requirements A variance in reduction of the side yard set back on the south boundary line of the property from 10 0 feet to 5 2 feet seems to be the only feasible solution No growth or vegetation is jeopardized as a result of this adjustment and the clearance and separation between the proposed construction and the nearest adjacent structure on the neighbor's property to the south is in excess of 22 0 feet It is our continued belief that a project of this nature will only benefit the surrounding neighborhood in addmg increased value to and maximizing the value of our property, as well as those surrounding pieces of real estate, the proposed design and location is similar to neighboring construction and is consistent with the historical design considerations for the neighborhood, and does not generate any potential increase to traffic considerations or parking location issues Also enclosed with this correspondence and vanance request and the attachments thereto, please find the required check made payable to the City of Stillwater in the amount of $70 00 If the members of the City Planrung Comrrussion or City Staff in prepanng for this request have any questions or desire an opportunity to personally view the property, please do not hesitate to contact me for that information or to make arrangements to inspect the property Very truly Karl lmw Enosures #4,..r-14,- .3141,,V.t y lc 1.1. it" _•=4+1E.t.=, E VALLET.6Lp. AL 5, 5/0 jTq4JJt. 2s. 12, ‹irr :y n .7( otHEITze. PNA TT 11441::. Jet4fr Spfre-e. L.1,/ VEPIr 60 ML, re.ri.-•" V. r3/4x,' ec,i, _L-0,L7114 WALL rer1-7.KiC " PAT, rAMPPRrY. Y, t" C-1,11.) 1?-4 Ptt.--tr) 11,1'›Ut • ALL e.1.1 Pvt•IF, Ge'e,T11-J4, GI) 1,i0121-1-1tLVAflJ - 1111.1111111.111.111111111111111111111111111111111, 5Tupl o 't ," -"o r-ve 7 PLctmc t171- S i. ►4NP'p Fps GrNr-lz.S Irlr G•tk r.! Abor c-ot.te rht'• 0 4r+, .r • t1pk..Lre. 61415* =T"+W/ Ice 4. WI.TGo...44+ EL VAt.1.BYS 4- st-0' yr it a vu.s. t54h gRSAI74-104. ?x geolx KrratzThzC tme.tt,rdt6p WY' PP4�MtNSa, l Jrlli .►vwr. SPA -e 14/ Vo-KIr C+4n40 r 1 tis1.5 is MIL, P --'r VA "S/0" G rsc, 0 OAT, T?' frIPP'Rre 1^?t1 f" GM 1) •1" Rtt-try ALL .4 Got r✓ Gre11r•1t4 2L, t e,u T p��ncN-tJ,t,a, p bi r, 614017 F„GctiL' L,LCG� ^rI 61,-.1 . F'?', n r I ni 1 Ohl (.,' i I i".4 Kz #JTjr`F. Irl'fI:✓K.inv_ s_p,AcE �' 1+rt ✓F, i MR Fr - RI4TFC: �JC-L r —' /O' Tt ',e Y P. mx-e-.c ch 1 1,4t4 a, s i'rE-!L#►li lzEnrt,l {2ALL_ � y %-L° Col \r-Ar ICc sF A ILt-0' c;), MA lid rtne-11r! h1 aV- i l l/z� UMW SSA S 41V !z.0. it.,o, J 1 4zcti-t= 14, /wrw s 1414 C 04. 1911~E Ts I/ lc E. 4 4.1,4 4{} I Ei.D VALETS 51-n UK- E/ ".ts 5/0 I;.YT 64E#T 441W, 214 PZ^-F clrP 7Gn Pr 'E IcrJFD I f o1 IE¢t p A rT 14' lb/ to-1 Jcle-rr SPA 1,41 VE�JT ✓r r MIt- F' Jvs ►S/P GesD1-I 1 • 5-X1 i.l' LL ce vvsl 11 1• ,c,I4-11,+7 1� 1 ricI flf1 • vitr:rr FTr7 $ 7 .,44EP14 (1 24/. l i°Tfi lost I I 1 E, /x SF•p <-1* ti MIL p t-r `/3 d r(r-E r Gisr-t l I./zdA13 G' c oe GIN IS►tEo C,tZp.rr it AZ N012-1--1 A � rIA I r'14r �r1t t`l/ II 14g1.L e'er 1 TI INT P'\MPPP111_ Gh1 2^ RILrt' Ir,l -UI ALL- t4.1 c4- r i 1 (2EI11F C.At1... G Tt1Ir> ^� 171 L '/A-1-HH t I/4" NI JIi 1 mil 111�� �11�"l 1141-a ilk N. T1 i11 lvl vv 14J'7 L f 1 � v �Jdd W vtl i. » > 1141 (1J . r f I , 1-, n� a s- r ti rl ter+ 11 u : - -3--1 / 7.I , c-, X. "AdhL y/ra 5 rl L-� I, l--3I 5 �,.141 maOLurwa+w N l0 132 L E 1-- LL. LL 66 STA PL. N 10 1O 132 132 to BU RLIN GTON rr-\ FOOTBALL FIELD BASEBALL PARK 8 i8132 I321 �s to N N N 8 N to N to t in tri 10132 1329 g ST E e cv 10 132 132 FO 132 18 1320 1 3 In N to N to 9 N in I) 10 132 LOUIS 8 18 132 132 1 to tii 3 N to 5 N 0 N in N to t iii 1� 101.32 1329 to 0 237 Carson Min Compam Cop%rpi lit 1974 66 ORL EAN: o 18 132 1321 8 GAD© �' N � to N N to QN to w 3 inI0132 132 9 66 12 14 co I i32 66 ST s 1813211321 0 in rri F a N to 1 to I ice': co. a 810132 I329 Fri 132 -V — 4 ? 3 132 4 6 7 F' T �� � 0 �1:1 9 N to16 66 co 132 2 E • HILLCREST LOTS 238 I��� 30< Ra N ��•,,),4 ,`�'`'gi,1 , -,„1 ,. v., 0, oitveYMade4 For: CERTIFICATE OF. SURVEY 013,,kaf 1' Ranum ''``�'� i' t ` ¢ h ,` , '► BARRETTM STACK '�` Al beet E .h Ranum ' w STILLWATER, MINN 55082 , Noi th Ma i rO Street P t t MINNESOTA REGISTERED Pltl lute,;�,' MN 55082 �'' ' ` � M LAND SURVEYOR ' r _4 • 04 43-=,,'. e t 11 1til No 439-3630 �'�N 7 anumwP,ar!ce1,,Descr,iption:,t,,(as, desc.r on Doc. No. 785997) st118eie'anCtheIN1/2-°of'Lot'14,f)llocic'8,' Hersey,' Staples and Co's A Addition to Stillwater. fS Ikilgtoll Count)4* hlhhesotat:`4)' Pr: F� , '91 � � iiberit E. Ilaniim" Palrcel Description: (as described on Doc. No. 768160) L¢t° ill xteeti 16 )4 and the south twelve and one-half (12 1/2) feet of Lot Seventeen (17) 001,6c1c ,fight;k8)l ,Hehslay, Staples and Cos. Addition to Stillwatert Wash. Co., Minnesota: dteti 0;'14D41 cai 8S" l/2S E4DtPori rpipe§et ma tked with a plastic plUg inscribed RLS 13774. M. Indicaitds Mea�ifl ed V81ue. 'hR. Indicates record Value. 0fftets'shbwnPto eXibtiffig Structures are measured to the outside building wall line, g: itnlebtr shbwh'`btheOWisiei - Ofbjections from said hall lines such as eaves, sills, etc.. ,. swil1'decPease'these offsets accordingly. Underground or overhead public or private utilities on or adjacent the parcels were M w not located in conjunction with this survey, unless shown or noted otherwise. 't;,-t Existing driveways were not located, unless shown otherwise. �`� 1 Hersey, Staples and Co's. Addition to Stillwater is recorded as Doc. No. 416049, V"'' 1 office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. --- CIO S 4 Z3 2 L or/i for /7 .P/32 — ^'fires 2vz M zRe 41, — 4'# 4.41- /fi t- Lore*" — — /fedrori ie/'g t M• /1Z ¢s — — aZ Sao Ovrsiew d,al --- ..�...044e. LiarL- Lor /S • J 0 en Ler .12405 E Set 8,tc __ - - So Laver iY,3 Ler /it 7 h 7 4 E • Alai: ay. ,f4 ¢/60¢9 ••• • L/r LerILir SKIP for /5 v4 RANuM Art No 70510-7 �S �± - ....Saf erri iZ�~%(/ / 4 Mr 4C9 /P. /.P2 s= or /¢ I hereby certify that th s survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota gme t �CoOSX / !•a/ear - 1 • • • si MI OS Date. 4-17-1997 . Reg No 13774 0 T • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/98-16 Planning Commission Date April 13, 1998 Project Location 1148 Parkwood Lane Comprehensive Plan District Agncultural Preservation District Zoning District AP Applicant's Name David Krinkie Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Descnption Special Use Permit for a home based heating and air conditioning business Discussion The request is to operate a heating and air conditioning busmess out of the above address The applicant would have one work vehicle in his driveway There will be no signage on the property All business performed will be at the customers residence Bookkeepmg and phone use would be the only busmess at the applicant's home Conditions of Approval 1 The Special Use Permit will be reviewed by the Planning Commission upon complaint 2 No nonresident employees 3 The Special Use Pernut is issued to David Krinkie and is not transferable 4 No signage on site 5 No busmess supplies or merchandise shall be stored or sold from the site 6 All business shall be preformed at customer's residence 7 One work vehicle only shall be parked on site Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings The granting of this Special Use Permit will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare Attachments Application Form Letter from Applicant/Petition 3 -I — ap Luuz O Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM ACTION REQUESTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Certificate of Compliance CITY OF STILLWATER 1( Conditional or Special Use Permit00 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET Design Review STILLWATER, MN 55082 Planned Unit Development* $500 ri FEE Variance $70/200 Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Subdivision* $100+$50/lot Resubdivision $100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project //03 /9/9,e,— 6O0 `mac/ Assessor's Parcel No 3/ 103o 46 4/ CO'O, Zoning District Description of Project "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property OwnerD4fri] $,L(,P-/.c1X-/i - Representative Mailing Address /4/8 ,oi9t,Civ0c) IA/ Mailing Address Telephone No 357 ' 7876., Telephone No Signature �a..11-tielQ Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) /' 5' x %Ch7 Land Area 2, Ac S Iitht of Buildings Stories Feet nncipal Accessory Total building floor Area sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 e 7 N 9 a Y 6 A fO g age•• am / alla mm ►► G'� ti 10 P.die pot a a 9 / `C am 00 C • a� e 0 c a 96 00 ie i .in as p B m be ye 0 r�00O ♦� •• \ e ,/ •o e0 0 as \ \ • V0 / ;i °o P.2 ~� 12 e b y 0 a l' y \ / 00 a 'p 0 60 B 00 Op 0 • 9 'a mm _ 0 17 R21W R20W RPM •p J0 a e ,e 6 a 4 ma o ° ark,' •S d •i 'b a6r mm P. •• air s /e" ,s t7 • ( a • 7 C 0 6 • \ 5 00O\ nzNall n i� naa nM 1,2 cOre \ We ils HERE i7(N AIL • ye \ 6 0 0 PEI 0 ae C .P.0r FAV 'a TA '_ •0 '9 or1a 0 a t. a •► 5 a .1, $ 5 . a2 7 • 0 d a ° •m 'e 4 ► q Oa n ar noe • na 8 lit. T27N� T27N • MI A E B ea •a R22W R21W R20W S m — OJTLQT B ace, r p .in W le• 6 a.• R16 0 Y a ada a27W 6 a• •• ` T.� `8 li 'dMW Nts ` \ a Vanity Map 8� B ` .. . , W N. s 11 W{GY�N9176S R ECT®1£7L0D AREA 62 AV C' PIP as .in pe B ' 1 s, `'� y 1 B yar�B:::S cV0a ram/ 1 I{ - aiia 8 \ b @ C ° �/v 01tO .a. ° AB pe � B e • q air 3ni a � , 012 V 0 239 a, ;,`� �/ `, Scale in Feet \ EST A ` 01 _ e1. TES LONG LAKE ESTATES 2 .:r Y SECOND ADDITION 4' mm a° ma yy a c Qe 3e a44 �d �a E./' .�1 z cP d�/ -- se a /aC.) aoi..® a 1 ma 441'T pc,,,_8 Tni. •aAiO • Ps ..a a p.. .r •eea.ne a b ....341 ty aWV.s1. ..t006 .c•.arartd Ilia •..`e.a. a a..EC da.mra a.aoa•e a.y WeMpbn CamMIb i, Location Map _ w • 'e� _ • 04 4' °amaa ...a v.. C.Wa lea.a.�a ORB n� - m'• •Sao Pp.a eama mn.ga. mama ca c ed D • • • March 13, 1998 Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 To Whom It may Concern I David Krinkie would like to start my own Heating & NC business from my home I would have one work vehicle in my driveway I would have no signs on the property, and all the work I would perform would take place at the customers home All of my business would be conducted away from my property, other than the record keeping I would do in my office at home would appreciate your consideration in granting permission for this request Sincerely, David W Krinkie otii6W ‘0 • I have been notified by David Knnkie of his intentions of starting his own business of STILLWATER HEATING & NC INC I have no objections to the starting of this business / / , ,,Lc 'G 1,-_ 1141- FIN v3Do b �-t-� I 1 g-1- �; DZ LT`) 9)D 2//7-(---e--- C - ft-5c, /a o/U /__/__) -11 it P te4)3 0CDD t-T-1, • • ?frt._ R 1.„„Th--- FPro,v, • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO SUP/DR/98-17 Planning Commission Date April 13, 1998 Project Location 626 North Fourth Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicant's Name Arthur and Elaine Halbardier Type of Application Special Use Permit Project Description Special Use Permit for the modification of an existing bed and breakfast ordinance to increase the number of bedrooms from five to six Discussion On February 21, 1997 the applicants received a Special Use Permit to operate the William Sauntry Bed and Breakfast The Sauntry Mansion has been operating as a bed and breakfast since 1989 The Mansion is about 7000 square feet of living space, and originally had nine bedrooms (including the staff sleeping quarters) The request is to utilize an existing studio apartment as additional bed and breakfast unit This area has been used as an apartment in various configurations since the 1920's It was built in 1890 as living quarters for household staff The applicants believe using this area as an apartment is not compatible with their primary business There are currently nine parking spaces on site plus three more in the garage that are used by the applicants The parking ordinance allows one parking space per guest room and two spaces for the manager They have five extra spaces The Bed and Breakfast ordinance allows 5 bedrooms maximum The purpose of limiting the size of bed and breakfasts was to allow, but control commercial activity in residential areas The proposal in not consistent with the 5 room limit Enclosed is a letter from the applicant listing their rationale and reasoning for the request HPC Action • • • At the April 6, 1998 meeting the Commission recommended approval of the request The Commission's decision was based on the unique qualities of the site such as 1 The building has 7,000 square feet - the largest B & B in Stillwater 2 The only B & B in Stillwater with a rental apartment (which means it has bedrooms it is not using) 3 Use of the space would be pnmarily on weekends, no traffic all day and night 4 The B & B already has more off street parking than is required by the ordinance 5 The Mulvary B & B (which was granted a variance by the City Council for more rooms than the 5 room ordinance requirement - 6-3-97) are unique because they have more than 5,000 square feet 6 The Building Inspector said they would be able to use the additional space and keep it within the fire code requirements 7 Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 Visitor parking shall all remain on the applicant's property 2 All present conditions apply (SUP/97) 3 Special Use Permit will be reviewed by the Commission upon complaint 4 If six guest rooms are allowed, the use shall meet State fire code requirements Recommendation Denial Findings In approving a special use permit or conditional use permit, it shall be determined by the Planning Commission that 1 The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this title, and of the Comprehensive Plan, relevant area plans, and the riverway regulations where appropriate 2 That any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed, and • • • 3 That the use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detnmental to the public welfare of the community Attachments Application Form Letter from applicant Floor Plan Petition approving the request from surrounding neighbors HPC ACTION 3-6-98 +6-0 Approval Case No 50 kg / Date Filed 3 26 q- Fee Paid I-30 Receipt No 139 S PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance ✓ Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 $50/200 $25 $500 $70/200 $500 $300 $100+$50/lot $100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application Address of Proje Zoning District PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION t 62( //, .J Description of Project 6t -1,6 03402C /.3 7 Assessor's Parcel No /069Z — 2 700 "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct I further certify ! will comply with the permit if if is granted and used " Property Owner Mailing Address Telephone No Signature 3o-2,f diLte-4-€A- Representative Mailing Address Telephone No Signature TE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) /7s x /So Total building floor Area Xiao sq ft Land Area • G S eau-- Existing sq ft tight of Buildings Stones Feet Proposed sq ft Principal 3 36 Paved Impervious Area 3 .eo sq ft Accessory Number of off street parking spaces provided /2- Revised 5/22/97 • • • The William Sauntry Mansion Stillwater, Minnesota Date March 20, 1998 IQ City of Stillwater, Minnesota From Art and Elaine Halbardier Owners of The William Sauntry Mansion Bed and Breakfast Inn Subject Modification of our Special Use Permit to utilize the existing studio apartment in our home at 626 N 4th as an additional bed and breakfast unit History and Our Petition On February 21, 1997, we received City Council approval to operate a five -unit bed and breakfast at 626 N Fourth Street (SUP 97/5) We purchased The William Sauntry Mansion from the previous owners, Duane and Martha Hubbs, who established the inn and had operated it successfully since 1989 (SUP 89/15) The William Sauntry Mansion exemplifies the highest standards of the innkeeping industry • The Sauntry Mansion is the only bed and breakfast inn in Stillwater listed on The National Register of Historic Places • It also is the only inn approved by the American Automobile Association (and assigned a Three Diamonds rating) • Recently, the Sauntry Mansion was awarded a "Quality Assurance" designation from the Minnesota Bed and Breakfast Guild" Quality Assurance is "a voluntary program which stnves to ensure guests that approved B&Bs meet or exceed the level of excellence set by the Guild Participating inns are visited by Hospitality Consultants, who focus on the areas of cleanliness, safety, guest comfort and host professionalism and integrity " We are requesting permission to use the existing studio apartment in the house as an additional bed and breakfast unit in The William Sauntry Mansion Our home is umque among those used for bed and breakfast businesses We believe our request is respectful of our hnstonc property, and compatible with the city's ordinance and state codes Rationale and Information 1 The area of the building proposed for the new unit is an existing studio apartment This space has been used as an apartment in various confiirations since the • • • 1920's It was built in 1890 as living quarters for household staff, and is therefore part of the registered histonc configuration of the mansion 2 The proposed new unit is on the extreme west end of the building, shanng only one common wall with the remainder of the house There is a pnvate entrance from our parking area, and a second exit as well for emergencies The City of Stillwater building inspectors have visited the site, and have recommended approaches we should follow in remodeling to ensure that the unit will be safe and compatible with existing fire and safety codes 3 Nine off-street parking spaces are currently available for guest automobiles, in addition to three more in the garage for our personal use No negative impact on the neighborhood would be created by approving this petition 4 The Stillwater ordinance acknowledges the significant costs of maintaining a histonc home "Allowing Bed and Breakfasts is in recognition that the expense of owning and maintaining histonc homes has made them less suitable for single-family dwellings " The ordinance permits five guest rooms in homes of 5,000 sq ft or more which had six original bedrooms The William Sauntry Mansion contains 7000 square feet of living space, and originally had nine bedrooms (including the staff sleeping quarters) The mansion is, therefore, unique in that it is larger than the other houses currently used as a bed and breakfasts Of course, property taxes, expenses for utilities, insurance, maintenance, and labor all reflect that greater size In the past year, we have invested more than $35,000 in repairs and enhancements, to preserve and to make the property safer and more attractive Approving our petition will make possible the ongoing financial feasibility of our inn 5 We need to use this 500 sq ft of our house profitably Why are we not considenng renting the space as an apartment? Because we feel this use is not compatible with our pnmary business As a bed and breakfast unit, we are better able to manage the use of this space for the benefit of our guests and our neighborhood We are committed to continue to pursue the highest standards in operating our B&B We hope you will see in our request a reasonable next step for our business, and by approving it enable us to continue to contribute to our neighborhood and as a member of the business community • 6 • • The William Sauna Mansion. A Bed and Breakfast Inn 626 North Fourth St*t §uHwater Minnesota 55e82-4827 Phone (612) 4304653 Fax 412) 3j1 7872 Email sauntrymn@aol cpm 4/ We are aware tdse Elame and Art HaIbardte'r of . untry Mansion a7g asking Ihe Planting Commision approval to convert the is ing s u >�� apartment in their house at 626 N Fourth to an additional bed and breakfalt room, n , are not opposed to ihts request °R-naeQ-�P Signature (Zue6/1-- 7oZ A) 11414-) 0).Ak 0/41/ gv-t4 to 4os /or( /0 ti 67//-e-eop_57L, i • • 12 SECOND 25 FLOOR 14 24 1 3ooXvmW HALBARD I ER PROPERTY L 2.S 4TH STREET h" ST I LLWATER , MN 17 O �A T H B A T H 43 BATH BEDROO ATH BEDROOM BEDROOM 16 1 3ooXomW TF TF B A T H 22 BEDROOM 12' BEDROOM 15' 1 15 16' Measurements Total 11 0 x 56 0 = 616 0 7 0 x 71 0 = 497 0 12 0 x 66 O = 792 0 10 0 x 53 0 = 530 0 -10 0 x 41 0 = -410 0 10 0 x 36 0 = 360 0 -10 0 x 30 0 = -300 0 -7 0 x 3 0 = -21 0 6 0 x 14 0 = 84 0 5 0 x 20 0 = 100 0 -7 0 x 29 O = -203 0 -10 0 x 41 O = -410 0 Third floor 1,635 0 16 OPEN PORCH .easurements = Total 'leasurements Total 15 0 x 95 0= 1,425 0 15 0 x 95 O1,425 0 12 0 x 94 0 = 1,128 0 12 0 x 94 0 = 1,128 0' B 0 x 78 0= 624 0 8 0' x 78 0= 624 0 -7 0 x 64 0= -448 0 -7 0 x 64 0= -448 0 3 0 x 60 0 = 180 0 3 0 x 60 0 = 180 0 -3 0 x 53 0= -159 0 -3 0 x 53 0= -159 0 -1 0 x 49 0= -49 0 7 0 x 49 0= 343 0 -11 0 x 25 O= -275 0 -19 0 x 25 0= -475 0 1 0 x 43 O= 43 0 1 0 x 43 0= 43 0 -6 0 x 65 O= -390 0 -6 0 x 65 0= -390 0 /:4 1 a-i 1) b1143u .,33 JEMP PAGE 01 • • • Paz CORRcNr OFF s- Rt.:-& r RKrMax 0 r74 �o as 1 S 5D m SO m 9 10 50 2 an 1 S 010 10 4 S 5 a obi 8 9 10 11 12 a % Oh 65) Os) mild S m s 30 50 m 2 1: 3 adiz 6 8 ad.) a3 2 .1 655) 23 osta 9 a3 a3 m 5 4 az aeg! 10 St t * t t`ada d 8 a3 3 Q Q 8 1!K Location Map aiB S adla, 1 so ® so !!30 72 7l 0aa 12 S gam ae1 1 S 1� s S^ so 19 18 • Sla 4 art REF LIM 60 mill ®L S 4 3 5 V 8 4 190 2 m3 WEST ELM STREET ®aa (oED snil£TFER FUR ) uo se 1152 4 1 4 8 ae1 ad5n 8 8 S 193 14753 3 Oho lA �1 3 19 2 a60S N so 50 s p o. a ,50. 3/ a:51 6 N R 16 to 0) S a161 S 1I1 aLt1 so $ 8 0) 1P P 2 9! '1 m./ 8 adb 2 $ ss�� ! 0. of A PAT �i \ \ \ '�i`A 7 SO F 7S 3 p \ co \ aab - 101tbl \ \ \ \ 1!0 d 7� a 0 d1 17 9 OAR — 10 3 2 540) Ws" tl 00 sal 15 66'n 160 so, 1P 1a is soaito 4 5 $3 as R21W R20W R19W 132N R22W R2114 MOW Vicinity Map 0 182 Scale In Feet �a•./l40. nasal svmY0 a..mvann 01.53 meads au.1 am. .e. linplen Candy men 7). a._..Lama wad lar lrnm a.p.a ady Wa0Yya Candy Y ad iapaa-Y b any Imsw.M Spam VM** a7sdy !warp? Me Rom 5 l 473115711 Pm. dal. armada p.a... ! ON • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/98-18 Planning Commission Date April 13, 1998 Project Location 214 Third Street North Comprehensive Plan District Public Administrative Offices Zoning District PA Applicants Name James Whipkey and Bob Ayres representing Ascension Episcopal Church Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the side yard setback (0 ft requested, 20 ft required) for the construction of a two story classroom Discussion The applicant is proposing to construct an approximate 2,500 square foot addition to the existing church building It would have two stories above ground and a basement level The need to expand is for more classrooms There is a competition between architectural firms for the final design So the approximate 2,500 square feet of the footprint is subject to change Parking spaces for the addition will be an issue, as will drainage of the site It is hard to calculate parking spaces until we know the number of rooms that will be developed The zoning ordinance for number of parking spaces for classroom is based on three parking spaces needed for each classroom Drainage is an issue since most of the parcel is impervious surface and there will be no easement for water to flow or pond if the applicant has a zero lot line Recommendation Denial Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 1 All utilities shall be completely screened from public view 2 A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval All lighting shall be • • • directed away from the street and adjacent properties Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles 3 All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission 4 A detailed drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer before building permits are issued 5 Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape areas 6 Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project 7 Any trash enclosure shall be made of a sturdy solid masonry material, with trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and matenals of the project 8 All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage dunng construction activity 9 No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public 10 All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface 11 Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance Construction dunng the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems 12 A sign permit shall be required for any project signs 13 Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer 14 Any sign package to be approved by the Hentage Preservation Commission 15 Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission 16 All security lights on building shall be downlit 17 All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community Development Director 18 A design permit from the Hentage Preservation Commission is required before a building permit is issued Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a variance • • • 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same distnct and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvdege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the vanance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public Attachments Application Form Site Plan 'flailing Address Telephone No Signature Property Owner Aht.e10ti1 EQic,c47p4 CA.1mad-141 Representative QAm£5 v1+i1P l`124"P'' 57-4`274sET h- Jri1Wesialtilailing Address 15z141) = t. td `Ybci 2.UDo'j Telephone No Ltai 8'Tf 2gLo a " I `� Signature .a . AvcA.m,s of LeNua1 32,0 Gs 4Mo 3c§1,AND G AvErtG CF 6J1crna 127 VS ANa 114 `S Lot Size (dimensions) 'boo x 11-7 Land Area 3c,100 5 F Height of Buildings Stones Feet inclpal cessory Revised 5/22/97 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Total building floor Area 1)o, 19Lo sq ft Existing 'Log 't%''n sq ft Cur-ahN) Proposed 10 . ^_= c sq ft (i i-0,-,) Paved Impervious Area 11S7 sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided 4- )04 rl G mar. ,3,, f- Lea , r•i� yr���'L 1�, u Ti �� Ili r✓ • Case No v Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No LBO 0 PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Lfryrbmr�ez> ld Rica. i-,f 'IAti1 A NI.E Foam r2.0 't.v , 0 Q1.oNL J1C:W1H Pn ,FSY4I a V14g• ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit Design Review Planned Unit Development* �X Variance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE $70 S50/200 S25 $500 S7s 00 S500 S300 5100+$50/lot S100 *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Z11 Na 3"4 STn --r Zoning District 1A' Description of Project Assessor's Parcel No ���`o `11°2O° ?/ =71S10N aT csF Exvklnx. 0,11a-f (f owivHlp) HALL- 3 STo�1� r �� �-�tiy , = lei n4- fiurro _I,. A!f-� initcG--S ,� `x o'-An, oLALerTowY a 50 511 cr )1AjN CA -Math ere ysta e er go rig s at�ments and �l dada, rnf rmatron and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct / further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Lj 1 rr1 C,Acovei I! t Eli i 1 1K� Ik y ALA rain aee.c /f/a r f � L/•78 f2 N„ro /yes Ater 7' 94t 7.. tor rr... 1•r to 1.iaotaimmi it/ n� ^a 1ti • 714 q --- — 4/7JDO "zz'E .ter �✓..� „g0 i y44e / ett1� VK 1 ,Co r /.z3 � •4�F ,xty' / 1111 - - -- - �orx T ov_XMColo ti �j2 "r, IAwa c ,e ;moo /f 3000S s»e�crr 4ievre El eve3 ,ivrc X6N f( 45-0 069 IA•r /o m AL'c - — dr/ foe Cfr F 47z Etept Rio - SnrOof /,4,0,40se GAITS fc R 67 d0 I.vv Si) " 6/�/ 0664 o t XJ I?fP'r1 CTf s -- — d.,1G'Tf/O4- G1lAtc (Tr?) i( ON fAan Zane,- SW S7l.ss :i6 "!i! /°! 30D D¢ - — - - 4;1+4 /I , No Ai 4e 6 .4r_tar E.rrss' Cb.r ELQY a Go /a 9D*gzo . yi'fo 4/ Co/'r to 2 ¢ S9l- 5X l4sTh.Lo A LD I NL FL - ,del.. C91%c" f-r, .1, LnJ. ♦ 1 /n eXCL,.11 L, . Ir 7.r A-�rT 11 2 55 93 0 2 17 3 16 0 4 15 5 6 14 W tUNITS a CARAC-ES Pam) COW/CN (now i) PIEA gab pMCP ,P 12 Pffn 2 7 west 11 10 8 93 6 15 - 10 Location Map 12 13 22 8 3 E ENs040 CITY OF93 STILLWATI 09, 10 OD) P:91) GARAGES gosscam ,5, 26 2 pi53) $ 3 P) 9R3) 'v 8 J Paz 4 P44 aen $ ,� 3 B L P� 9 CITY OF STILLWATER 2ica 23 3 Pam% Pam) 1 1) 55 55 P44) ,CA 10 $ • 1✓ P43)> 9 '8 ,tlo 8 P19A 7 93 (061) 6 $ 'c N GSP R2)W R2OW R19W R22W R21W R2UW Vicinity Map -t- 0 152 Scale in Feet ▪ d as a., a aa.w= n od wed.. al b yawns yea.. Walleye=Caa.ry Damn 11▪ .• barley .aaea by is., b N..ev MYNA. a.4 WWI.. Oaf. Y net rayon: sis-. b.m.si 2 aea. w.r,e.a1�.� ab..P 1l=awasent v.aem named u.e,ya re.a.l xa. sa • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V98-19 Planning Commission Date April 13, 1998 Project Location 709 West Willard Street Comprehensive Plan District Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Robert and Lorene Bonine Type of Application Variance Project Description A Variance to the side yard setback (2 ft requested, 5 ft required) for the construction of a second stall to their garage Discussion The request is to construct a second stall attached to the existing one car garage The dimensions of the proposed garage is 13 ft by 20 ft There are pnmanly requesting the vanance to accommodate their six year old son, he has been diagnosis' with Hypotonia Attached is a letter from their son's physical therapist with an explanation of Hypotonia and accommodations needed No trees or large vegetation will be disturbed When the construction is completed they will plant more vegetation The applicant has enclosed a petition from the surrounding neighbors supporting the request Conditions of Approval 1 The addition be similar in style and colors as the existing house and garage 2 Drainage from the roof remain on site Recommendation Approval Findings • • • 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same distnct and in the same vicinity, and that a vanance, if granted, would not constitute a special pnvilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authonzing of the vanance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public Attachments Application Form Letter from Applicant and Physical Therapist Petition Photos so 50 a a a 50 25 122 122 122 CPPMENT 93 122 13 125 12 03 103 tit /1, 114 th 134 25 13135 13035 50 (502 1502 1030) PM) 10031) (T) 5; 9 ) 7 O/fa ) 8 ) 1 6160) 1322 1302 1503 1503 9 75 150 53 to �SF'O s 1toa11 Am, 250 1321 Imo) 55z) ^ 2 13a1 ��15pQ05 — 15II5 �, 175 L R 9 pm) s• A A 0mo1 3 �g 1a to a(2O 150s ■ 150s so 75 75 100 52 4 52 W941 • • �04,0.2 502 502 502 79 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 70. 4 9 707 6 5 10�2) fait,, 91�7) N91) 51 , S� 10ta) Q — 91t9) (0t71 81- 1mb) '9 Ji � �w 50 75 75 100 25 51 S 5( 50 51 3293 119 51 99 % 50 5033 5033 5033 5133 as VEST PINE SngET 8 R 8 1211 3 t1) 0 93 Oda) 120 311 9366 as 2 321 15 131 701 Nit.) 521 50 A tots) 50 63 P—. (0)86 ado) 8 06) 2 9 120 R 30 30 122775 O 10131 8 O Nlk 0 0 17125 12 Peal 83 FIVE 3 1 25 0 06) 0 61 25 0 R 60 150 6 5 s 9 ACRE �IN 4 gSIU14 1 No'1 3 2 N1g3) 0 y 12 1 150 150 50 IR0) 5 0) (5 4 Nits 35 3 15 50 50 Nit.) 2 1 335 a.. 21) 15 8 = 9 10 goso • so 15 9 5 11 12 Nt51 50 50 • so Nab) 8 5 4 6 8 9 so a so 3 S1 28 1 2 IOt91 51 51 g 10 11 12 - 53 so 5) m a 50 Location Map 6 0 e0 60 SD >0 12 a \ 50 5l68 58 4 - 9/ 8 1F tom) 00) toes) a 12 2 = 7 8 8 9 3 10 8 11 ! 12 = Nit) 03) 50 53 50 50 50 5 50 25 (0*) 9 50 50 50 6 5 4 3 s 2 s 1 s S 5v OW 9100) a 7 8 8 2 )5316 0.0) 7 tab) 9 A 10 F 11 5i 12 (cai9) 80 6 0 60 s = 6 A (06 O 31 s 4 8 016 m 3! 50 2S1 a 7 s 8 06 a R s 10 11 9 10te) O 55 9 sa so a 50 50 Nt0 4 3 2 (0050) Nit) 8 7 5i 8! 98 108 112 (ol0) Nab) nag) 6 0 50 5055 50 so 6 0 50 5 50 20 a 0 0 m m m a 6 0 5o 50 so to n m 6 0 50 9 5D 53 a ;'S ADDITION 5, s =6 s 5 4 s 3 s 2 s 1 s -51 6 s 5 4- 3= 2- 2 1 Ni) Nits) 9oiln 03) Ndb) Nabs Nita) pab) 3TP R2)W R2OW R19W n2N R22W R2)W R2OW Vicinity Map 0 163 Scale in Feet n a.eeel9 ti mull a mad. End ewefuabnS b neafe es9les mow ctovwMabn comfy offices T. oft.. be be ..d b1 Mem. pees. wesM9e Comfy es1 moms. he wn.mara 9a.0 waYgle.1 cw.1, a ereeet. O1k. fie.(11 ).0.75 Parmi *ea am.ef IkeWk Flnay T a34 03/09/1998 10 36 4308810 CITY OF STILLWATER PAGE 02 • Case No - Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED - Certificate of Compliance — Conditional or Special Use Permit - Design Review Planned Unit Development` $ Vanance - Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Subdivision' Resubdivisron Total Fee FEE $70 $�QJ200 $25 $500 $70/200 $500 $300 $100+$5Q/lot $100 'An escrow fee ,s also required to cover the costs of attorney and englneering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION •ress of Project 709 W cU, (lard St, 5i;llliocat-1 Assessor's Parcel No 33- 3v- O �Cj Zoning District Re?-Iden4-La 1 Descnptron of Project d4i i-, o rl o f cz cXLr 9a rcL5 . "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct 1 further certify I will comply with the permit iffn if is gra�nted and used " Property Owner r�°batl/r Boni ne_ Representative L_ U (211. 2br r € Mailing Address 101 W rU , ttarc44-f SII(Iwakr Mailing Address -1 Oq W r,(,) , lta.rd St) Telephone No -OLl3c1-$-7' ( rt.) 3S'l-L 3.. Telephone No 14IJf S 81' I . I-130 - b-1 Signature 2crt,- 0, „,„„A_ Signature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) b C) x 150 Land Area Height of Buildings Pnncipal Accessory • Revised 5/22/97 Stones Feet Total building floor Area Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided A.` sq ft • • • March 27, 1998 Planning Commission Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 N 4th Street Stillwater MN 55082 Dear Planning Commission Members We are requesting a variance of 22 inches to add a second stall to our garage Please refer to the drawings and pictures of our single family home for details This garage will be utilized to park our second vehicle inside The reason for the request, besides the usual advantages of having both vehicles inside, is to assist our son in getting in and out of the vehicle One of the diagnosis' our son has is Hypotonia Attached is a letter from Matthew's physical therapist with an explanation of Hypotonia and accommodations needed The only vegetation that will be disrupted by the addition is a small hedge of Alpine Current, grass where the proposed garage will be, and a small strip of flowers No trees, or other large vegetation will be disrupted Upon completion of the construction we will plant appropriate flowers/shrubs to add a finishing touch to the project The added garage stall will not create additional traffic, or parking needs, and should not be injurious to the neighborhood The biggest affect will be that those passing by will look at a garage door instead of into our back yard Also attached is a letter signed by neighbors stating that they have no objection to the granting of a variance for the addition of the garage If you need any further information please feel free to contact us at your convenience Lorene is the most available during the day at her place of employment (430-8607) Bob is a teacher and can return calls during his free period You can leave him a voice mail at 351-6932 Thank you for your consideration of our request Sincerely, Robert A Bonine i-zg(,te_47 8AA,/,.., Lorene M Bonine • • • 3/24/98 The Community Development Department City of Stillwater To Whom It May Concern I have had the opportunity over the past couple of years to work with Matthew Bonine, a 6 year old boy with developmental disabilities, in both a rehabilitation facility and in school Matthew has limitations in his gross motor skills due to hypotonia (low tone) with resultant impairment of balance and compromised muscle strength Because of his immature motor skills, Matthew has difficulty maneuvering on ice and snow and has a tendency on these uneven and slippery surfaces to lose his balance and fall He also has difficulty grading (adjusting) his movement, making the opening and closing of heavier doors unsafe - he opens them too wide or can close them without meaning to - this kind of activity can also cause Matthew to experience a loss of balance and fall I understand that Matthew's parents are planning on building an addition to their garage For Matthew's safety, it would be beneficial for him to have more room to maneuver than other children his age due to his difficulties with coordination and balance Sincerely, - Lee B Williams, PT • • • I, the undersigned, have no objection to granting a vanance for an addition of a second garage stall to the house located at 709 W Willard Street, Stillwater, MN Name & Address (piNolro-• Ko i (g r 7e 3 (.2/ -z�� -4 I -E-cu-v--(;,.Sf _.S V/— / 7 / so. C"-thy S T/c, 7/ 7 Vila,/ f 5 -2/I/%"* _ /7 ,ta, Mfaj-y1_,A 4feLe Date 7/2-3- 799,g 3ize/9e .3/.25/y/ 3/ems197 dV• , • 'al, a .4511111- PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/98-20 Planning Commission Date April 13, 1998 Project Location 911 Fifth Avenue South Comprehensive Plan Distnct Two Family Residential Zoning District RB Applicants Name Richard McClain Type of Application Vanance Project Description A Variance to the front yard setback 0 ft requested, 30 ft required) for the addition of a 3 foot catwalk to the north side of the residence in conjunction with a deck that is being replaced Discussion The request to construct a 3 foot catwalk on the north side of their home This catwalk would connect a deck that is being replaced on the northeast side of the house to the entry level of the house The configuration of the house is unique in that the main level of the house is at street level on the westside, and is the third story on the east side (see photos) The applicant states that due to the topography and elevations around the deck, a stairway is not a viable solution If they were to construct a stairway it would have to go down about 3 1/2 floors to a somewhat level area of ground The house and lot are nonconforming according to the current zoning ordinance Due to the severe topography, the house was built 2+ ft from the front property line some thirty years ago Thirty feet front yard setback is the required distance Conditions of Approval 1 All deck and catwalk plans be approved by the Building Official Recommendation Approval as conditioned Findings • • • • 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance 2 That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form Survey/Elevation Letter/Photos 03/25/1998 15 42 4308810 CITY OF STILLWATER PAGE 02 • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED FEE Certificate of Compliance $70 Conditional or Special Use Permit $50/200 Design Review $25 Planned Unit Development* $500 J/Variance $70/20 Comprehensive Plan Amendment` $500 Zoning Amendment* $300 Subdivision' $10Q+$50/lot Resubdivision $100 Total Fee *An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project // 1/4571/ail Se44 Assessor's Parcel No 31/D300202o7O4&S Zoning Distnct M5 Description of Project 3 - ; ' )7 C4414z-/‘ /Wx97- / L44/:F_ o!= Aera.se QlLvdrv� /�C/sS 77 Oi c/e "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and behef, true and correct 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used " Property Owner /ef/�--rr , (' 'L '4/ Representative Mailing Address 9// /4/e- -S $ //-"2h' Mailing Address Telephone No - 930 - 9 /7 Telephone No SignaturSignature SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lot Size (dimensions) x Land Area Height of Buildings Stones Feet • Pnncipal Accessory Total building floor Area sq ft Existing sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided Revised 5/22/97 • • • (14,11.,,, olott,-, v.11,rk„ '' a Itill'i„:,'',:i,:lkissii...i.c;.''' , , t41\5 4 IA '4 0" 1 % 0 ! r 4 1 fl. ,,T,i. , cil -r v i )-1., ‘ v Nrpir, i . t f ,i,4., i • /-. I. 1 . 11.4 I / N‘;‘'. ', 14,ol/ttl.) ‘. k tf ^ ) '41 e L.V.. r , i ce ei 0 - rk ‘A(.1 X o. , • 1, • -...-.1.,!,,,--;,:c.-:',..,,r,:.,,:-. '.:gf,';:..•,-,-.7.':Wigi!1•41-,,;:-.'...gi....'r • 4c� 12oft 4� F 6655 66661 1z13 11 4 OF' 9 9 10 22 39 ' 2187 PAR °175 S 26 33 8 14 33 115 10363 7667 4010 r LINE m14 264 VAC 148 DEEDS PG 233 2 VAC556340 0 _HI )DSON STRFFT VAC ®(146 DEBTS PG 61 132 18 8 17 42� 16 15 a�1 14 13 1 12 Pik 132 PAP 3 4 6.666 5 6 7 8 ,d2 a1 P 9 10 Pea EAST t12 B 18 8 8 17 64561 16 10451 15 14 15 P�1A Location Map 8 9 132 8 2 3 1a�'A 8 2 5 GI 132 dada 4 (ado 6 6646 8 66 66 10 Pik 91 a 132 (cello 5 Iolk 132 132 8 -o 8 8 8 14 alA) 13 17 16 2 3 15 Pen 14 4 A d9 132 132 01141 2 3 4 1c�A 5 6 8 Al 8 LOT 2 EAST OF EASTERLY ICAGO 8 NORTMNESTERNIRR TO NSP EASEMENT 15DEEDS PG179 LOCATION) 66 66 8 W LL 8 8 8 STREET 1]2 18 6,114 17_ 2 16 *o 3 15 4 P*' 14 Pg+ 135 13 6 4121N R21W R20W R19W R22W R21W R2OW a Vanity Map A �r 0 167 Scale in Feet In ermine M mad d amebae ad regaled. el r Nome v Ng n1m. Wee age. Gerdy ages The * g .muu be ome a ragas pupae erg Weenpm Grey r..mmer a Ng yrarraaa Source Wahine he Casa Swage 011b Mir (4 2) U0m1! 7 12 1027 12 P. 7 red dale erne lloargh abed. 2 Sell dot • • • 26 March, 1998 Members of the Stillwater Planning Commission We are requesting a variance to add a 3-foot catwalk to the north side of our house in conjunction with a deck we are replacing on the northeast corner There was a deck attached to the house when we bought it 4 years ago, but it was in such poor condition that we had to remove it The original deck had no access except from inside the house We thought this was a safety issue, and we decided that when we replaced the deck, we would provide easy access and escape routes in case of a fire The configuration of our house is unusual in that the main level of the house is at street level on the west side, but is the third story on the east side (See photos) Due to the topography and elevations close to the deck, a stairway is not a prudent or viable consideration, nor would it provide as quick an evacuation route The original deck was approximately 20 feet above the ground, with no way to get down The proposed 3-foot catwalk would provide quick access to the street level on 5th Ave South in case of an evacuation The main issue is that our house was originally built without regard to present day 30-foot setback requirements (See survey ) The lot elevations and the proximity to the edge of the bluff dictated that the house be built in its present location, creating a hardship in that the 30 foot setback from the west property line actually passes through the center of our house This hardship requires a variance for anything we do to the house west of the setback line We previously applied for a variance for a privacy wall on the west side of our house, and this variance was approved The proposed 3-foot catwalk is almost completely obscured by the privacy wall and the trees on the west property line It is also east of (behind) the privacy wall, and therefore impinges to a lesser extent on the setback than the existing approved wall The pictures provided show how obscured the northwest corner of our house is from the street The 3-foot catwalk does not impinge on any views or access on 5th Ave South, and we have polled our neighbors and they have no objections to our project 5th Ave South is a dead end street, so traffic considerations are not an issue Many residents and visitors come to the end of our street to enjoy the view of the river Our catwalk would not affect that view in any way It is also noteworthy that most of the homes on our street have a similar problem with setback I invite the planning commission members to come and look at our house, and I'm sure they will see our dilemma, and that our project will provide an additional level of safety without causing undue infringement on 5th Ave South For these reasons, I feel our request for a variance is reasonable, and respectfully ask for your approval Sincerely, Richard E McClain enclosures f- • • • View of old deck structure looking southwest from northeast corner of lot View of old deck structure looking southeast from north driveway • • • View looking east from 5t Ave South ^+�T+v+JJANSSA JmY fk' shows privacy wall and obscured northwest corner of house Additional view looking east Additional view looking southeast past dead end barrier • • • View from north looking at north side of house Catwalk would lie between line of picture windows and span across width from east to west Note trees on west edge obscuring view from 5th Ave South J0I9-1 s I z o . Ir4x LJ Is'Ts6'ILoo. L TPT L.Lu E: LAI• �6AM x Le-,< l Z4 G`- '%'ie- Srtc F2Al Zrz 4rjP1C f.�AliA,T-t5 x LO II41'_I' L00 LI pan ALL, t-•I1-I vc:L1- , ,q-o goc te r IL 4 Si L 3015.1*- ► I' x IJ� I 1 e.W -tJO LIFA. 114V-0" L 11> Ll AvE. LiOA-rr Md K""� SCALE: S 1J o"r APPROVED BY DATE: 3 I i a 1 I V Ave. tr 14o. rAuL, I4''-i!o" • • Survey Made For Sheridyn and Richard McClain 911 5th Avenue South Stillwater MN 55082 tel (612) 430-9349 Notes CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY "SBL" Indicates bldg setback line Orientation of this bearing system is assumed "M " Indicates measured value "R " Indicates recorded plat value o Indicates 1/2" I D iron pipe set marked with a plastic plug inscribed RLS 13774 • Indicates Judicial Landmark found in place as noted Note JLM No 13 is missing Note encroachments as shown or dimensionally noted hereon Note Adjudicated boundary overlap as shown Discuss this matter with legal counsel for Underground or overhead public or private utilities on or adjacent the parcel were not located conjunction with this survey, unless shown otherwise Note plowed road loc across adjoiner W'ly Offsets shown to existing structures are measured to the outside wall line at waist level PARCEL DESCRIPTION Lor ¢ I io r BARRETT M STACK STILLWATER, MINN 55082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR Tel No 439-5630 /‘ /9s y.g,‘ 7 Loc W000 FE wee p P,e,v 1VILL koN NA IAA Avg'. (5®. A:41/Ei+7.E,c/T of aNC eiVES PRE✓ 144474L E4Ye-f Overall Parcel Area C to the Ajudicated Pro 20146 Sq Ft ± tt • N I ,eer J IQ6 - - f '/ 39'E Toe lculated erty Line' Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 17, Hersey, Staples & Co's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota (Plat record Doc No 416049) .eisz M/5'3/ -- SLoPE - - -ft/ /9Z Z/ - - NO"4/ 39' 1 1 7/1 ag 4- \ r \ , is/ /er a2 -- s�ooE '� \1 \111i1 14NP2,7rrEo L, 2/1 os �! 26 8/ Oo /¢3- f\ !Y4°0339'4' - Z 2 9G - an opinion in - 2.7 z 9 79s i ` 11 11.41 ` �.e._ JLM#// I hereby certify that this survey plan or rcport was prepared by me or under my direct cupervision and that I am a duly Registered Land SuncyoJ under the Taws of the State of Minnesn '1 • Date G-2-7`1 7 / #40-7VO/CATEo BOaseav,eV Ovn,eh',° v'g 1774 Official co i�,1f this ma are crim. sealed .1 • • • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM CASE NO V/DR/98-23 Planning Commission Date Apnl 13, 1998 Project Location 14200 60th Street North Comprehensive Plan Distract Business Park Commercial Zoning Distract BP-C Applicant's Name Doug Lanham, representing Famous Dave's Restaurant Type of Application Vanance Project Descnption A Variance to the sign ordinance for additional signage for Famous Dave's Restaurant Background The Sign Ordinance allows businesses in the Business Park Commercial Distnct to have one sign, budding sign or a freestanding sign Famous Dave's submitted a sign package for design review to the Hentage Preservation Commission at the June 2, 1997 meeting The request was for a pylon sign and signs of the east, west and south sides of the building The Commission voted to approve the pylon sign and the south non -illuminated building sign On June 9, 1997, the Planning Commission approved a variance for two signs, a south facing budding sign along with the one allowed pylon sign Discussion Famous Dave's is again requesting design review for additional signage, three wall signs One sign is proposed for the south side (front) of the building The sign would be backlit with neon ruby red can letters and a white plexiglas face The applicant said they would be wilting to remove the existing pylon sign if they could have three building signs The sign ordinance states that a wall sign shall not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parrallel or sustantially parallel to the front lot line The budding is 78'6" long, the proposed sign is 78 26 square feet Two additional wall signs are requested for the east and west sides of the budding These sign requests were denied by both the Planning Commission and HPC last year Both would say "BAR-B-QUE" They would be backlit neon ruby red can letters with a white plexiglas face These signs are 21 square feet each, and the building is 92'6" long The applicant stated they could remove the pylon sign if they could be approved for three building signs • • • • Along with the above requests, the applicant is suggesting an exposed ruby red neon roof band on the upper and lower facia If it can be determined it is part of building signage or lighting it is subject to design review by the HPC HPC Action At the Apnl 6 1998 meeting, the Commission denied the request and suggested that they keep their pylon sign in place and install a lit "Famous Dave's" sign (square footage of the sign that is permitted in the sign ordinance) on the front of the building The Commission felt that when the land to the west of the site is developed, any signage on the side of the building would be lost Also, they stated that most of the businesses on Highway 36 (in Stillwater) were granted a front building sign and a pylon sign, but no signage has been approved for side signs except when the business is on a corner The sign ordinance allows businesses in this zoning district signs on the street sides Conditions of Approval Should the Commission approve the above request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval 1 No additional signage be allowed 2 As per the sign ordinance no sign shall extend above 20 feet as measured from the base of the building wall to which the sign is affixed 3 The pylon sign shall be removed before the new signs are installed, or a cash deposit acceptable to the City, filed with the City for the cost of pylon sign removal Recommendation Denial Findings 1 That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists In this context, personnel financial difficulties, Toss of prospective profits and neighbonng violations are not hardships justifying a vanance 2 That a vanance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property nghts possessed by other properties in the same distnct and in the same vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors 3 That the authorizing of the vanance will not be of substantial detnment to adjacent property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan Attachments Application Form Letter from Applicant Elevations Minutes from June 2, 1997 HPC Meeting June 6, 1997 Planning Commission Meeting • Case No Date Filed Fee Paid Receipt No PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 ACTION REQUESTED Certificate of Compliance Conditional or Special Use Permit V Design Review Planned Unit Development* Vanance Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment" Subdivision* Resubdivision Total Fee FEE 70 50/200 $500 300 $100+$50/lot $100 2- .'S *An escrow fee Is also required to cover the costs of attomey and engineering fees (see attached) The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project /'{)-GO (oO g 7(' 1/� 1 0 / Assessor's Parcel No Zoning Distnct 810 Description of Project Fi ii'uit S N.,,o.Pis-/c.-e.fl ,u4&rs>Z% C-r 6 -cQ "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct 1 further certify / will comply with the permit ifftit �►s granted and used " Property Owner /1WUS ha.182 JkC� 5 -- P �YRepresentative U� LI1Gt 1�V1 l Mailing Address `1a-79 F Di Or Mailing Address i Ste' J 'de-vA p r r j {'!,, n1 Ss 3 l Telephone No _ i Telephone No `�J Signature r � 3G Signature 1 9 Lot Size (dimensions) Land Area a 3(P e� Height of Buildings SITE AND r / x, a. Stories acncipal cessory PROJECT DESCRIPTION Feet Total building floor Area -- 4 ) sq ft Existing 5 2 Sid sq ft Proposed sq ft Paved Impervious Area low noo sq ft Number of off street parking spaces provided )17 Revised 5/22/97 • t rTh- PLA-rvN 1 11\-q GOt*C\rCN%5S tON - (, -c1- q 7 square -foot addition to an existing single family residence at 2318 Boom Road in the RA, One Family Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland District William C Messner, applicant Mr Messner was present for the discussion He said the existing garage is 15'3" from the property line There was some question as to whether the roof over the requested upper porch would be enclosed Mr Messner explained the request is for a roof/eaves only to keep the weather out Mr Russell said if both ends of the upper porch are open, he would not object to the proposal Mr Russell noted the request has been sent to the DNR for review, the DNR comments had not been received at the time of the meeting The request also has to go before the City Council Mr Zoller, seconded by Mr Roetman, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed 6-1, with Mr Wiedner voting no Case No V/97-29 A variance to the front and side yard setbacks for a 6 foot extension of a porch and the construction of a two -car garage with a shop above at 602 N Fifth St in the RB, Two Family Residential District Amy Senn, applicant The applicant and her husband, Jason Ruddie, were present for the discussion Ms Senn presented a list of 33 signatures of neighbors indicating there were in agreement with the proposed project She said the space above the garage primarily would be used to store tools as the couple is in the process of restoring their home, the space would not be used for any business purpose Mrs Bealka, seconded by Mr Rheinberger, moved approval as conditioned Mr Zoller said he thought the proposed improvements would add to the entire neighborhood, and Mr Fontaine noted the setback encroachment already exists Motion passed unanimously Case No V/DR/97-30 A variance and design review for four signs, one allowed, for a restaurant located at 14200 60th St N in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Prowood Signs Inc , applicant Tom Steinke, representing Prowood Signs, was present for the discussion He explained the requested sign package and provided colored drawings of the requested signs i r Jim Blichfeldt, developer of nearby twin -homes, expressed his concern •about the requested sign on the western elevation of the building He also questioned the use of block on the rear elevation of the building Wayne Branum, no address given, asked how far the request deviates from the sign ordinance Mr Russell noted that the requested pylon sign is within the ordinance guidelines He also noted that adjacent businesses, Baker's Square and Rose Floral, also have signs on the front of the building, in addition to a pylon sign John Bourdaghs, Shorty's Cleaner, pointed out that when he opened his drop-off business in River Heights Plaza, he was not allowed to put a sign on the front of the building The only signage he was allowed was a "cleaners" sign on the main Plaza sign He suggested that if the city has an ordinance, it should be enforced Ken Muller representing Famous Dave's restaurant noted that the restaurant closes at 10 p m and the sign lights will be turned off at that time He said the request is for nothing more than already exists on Highway 36 businesses He further said if something has to be eliminated, the developers would prefer to eliminate the signs on the side of the .building Mr Steinke said he thought the front entry signs served an important function Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Valsvik, moved approval of the requested pylon sign and the requested sign on the front elevation Motion passed 6- 1, with Mr Wiedner voting no Case No SUP/V/97-31 A special use permit and variance for construction of a detached two-story garage structure with an efficiency dwelling unit on the second level at 1213 Fifth Ave S in the RB, Two -Family Residential District Kari Nickeson-Ranum, applicant Karl Ranum represented the applicant, his wife, and made a presentation outlining their proposed plans He said the request for the efficiency apartment on the second level of the garage was merely to take advantage of the two-family zoning The only variance issue is the height of the structure which is 24 feet versus the allowable 20 feet (Later in the discussion, Mr Russell said the height of the structure meets the ordinance as it is a gabled roof ) • HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 2, 1997 Present Roger Tomten, chairman Katherine Francis, Jeff Johnson, Robert Kimbrel, Howard Lieberman (7 15 p m) and Brent Peterson Absent Jay Michels Others Sue Fitzgerald, planning Chairman Tomten called the meeting to order at 7 05 p m Approval of minutes Ms Francis noted a correction in the minutes in Case No SUP/DR/97-23 The motion of approval as conditioned was made by Ms Francis and seconded by Mr Kimbrel, motion of approval failed 2-3, with Ms Francis and Mr Kimbrel voting in favor Mr Johnson, seconded by Mr Peterson, moved approval of the minutes of May 5, 1997, as corrected Case No DR/SUP/V/97-24 Design review of the renovation and addition of residential apartments at 124 S Second St Jon Whitcomb, applicant Present for the discussion were Mr Whitcomb and Dave Brooks Mr Whitcomb provided architectural renderings of the proposal, along with photos of the existing site Mr Whitcomb explained that the plans as shown have been changed some, specifically, the north elevation as shown would be the front elevation After some discussion, members agreed they could do little more than reiterate the concept approval given at the May meeting Mr Whitcomb was advised that he needs to provide the HPC with detailed elevations, color and materials samples, lighting plans, the design and location of the trash enclosure, etc , before the Commission can give project approval Case No DR/97-7 Design review of an exterior signage and awning at 229- 233 S Main St Will Rogers, applicant Mr Rogers was present for the discussion He provided color and lettering samples The awnings are being replaced on both buildings, the logo will not be on the new awnings • r^ Mr Kimbrel asked about total square footage Ms Fitzgerald said the applicant will have to be held to the allowable lineal square footage Mr Kimbrel also asked about lighting Mr Rogers said he would like to fix the existing lights if that would be permitted, if not, he will leave the lights as is -- non functional Ms Fitzgerald said the assumption was that the lights would stay not working Mr Johnson said given the proximity of street lighting and the questionable effectiveness of the awning lettering to pedestrian traffic, he would have an objection to allowing the lighting Mr Kimbrel, seconded by Ms Francis, moved approval as conditioned, all in favor Case No DR/97-8 Design review of exterior signage at 324 S Main St Chuck Dougherty, applicant Mr Dougherty was present for the discussion He explained the request is to re -use an existing, internally lit sign Mr Johnson asked whether there was any lighting planned for the north side Mr Dougherty said there is one existing light on the north side of the building, he may request an additional light over the entrance at a later date Mr Dougherty explained that he is painting the existing white sign a cream color to take care of the lighting intensity issue Mr Johnson provided some suggestions regarding the sign graphic Mr Peterson moved approval with the additional condition that staff review the cream color of the sign to ensure it takes care of the brightness issue Mr Kimbrel seconded the motion, all in favor 30 Case No DR/V/97 6 Design review of exterior signage at 14200 60th St Famous Dave's of America, applicant Karl Steinke, representing Edison Signs, was present for the discussion Ms Steinke provided color drawings and explained the requested sign package Mr Johnson said he felt the requested pylon sign made sense given the location, and he said he could agree with the sign on the front of the building and the two small entry signs However, he said the two 2 x 9 • OP MOP 000144010414,4131 OP ate 01 COPP J O^ Lee '•, •. 4. ..n t .1� a ^v Ogg ti ep ao 4. YR oakm _ . a R B t " • t It a e . ✓u Y : • .11 nth § N96MHOa 0Qn0®a onotoLoomooen as, wnaPSINenveR RPm MOOS PG 601H SHitt I NORTH R SFELTCIN POOP ^ 4 qa e waauaE ARD PER aimsrwitwa a• 1410434.11 OTY651I11WATBa 3BTOi. � a a 5 tl t4 t 13, S1CNO61 R NCTCPoA COURT R CALIBRE RIDGE TWINHO a5 a BOTH Location Map 413,4 4 1� C 4 e/ a A / 4' R/ 8 m R 4 MVP PT OPP MP 4 Peel IMO POPO 00.04 41. PI POO COTO a A 6 R2IW R2OW ROW R22W R2IW R2OW Vanity Map sIRttI NORTH 14 0 270 Scale in Feet 1bSdrobbe YI. Fouls cern010 .a e.ameas.a b bee. � solosU.. oleo. Wu ntlbt Rarw. The droop .ee.0 be need b Nen ;moat.s e*M Co ro m moo.. b 05 Ynm..[K Slav W. OlVmC O. Smoot Mee Pone (S TI C0.667S .ea ere amre i4 .g3 f.s.q 20 Ps • • Ms Sue Fitzgerald City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Sue The purpose of this letter is to request a design review and variance for proposed sign additions and neon banding to the Famous Dave's on Highway 36 in Stillwater Specifically, our proposal is three -fold 1 Add "Famous Dave's" sign, utilizing script lettering -only logo, on the upper front facia of the building in back -lit neon (ruby red) can letters with white plexi face 2 Add "BAR-B-QUE" sign, with capitalized letters, to each side of the building, in back -lit neon (ruby red) can letters with white plexi face 3 Add exposed ruby red neon roof banding at upper and lower roof facias Per my understanding of the city's requirements, attached (or provided in the case of the sign sample) are the following • Completed application for design review and variance along with a check for $225 to cover the $25 and $200 fees, respectively • Exterior elevations with dimensions of proposed signage • Photos of signage on building • Full size sample of "Famous Dave's" sign letter, showing color and material • Written paragraph on "what we want to do" and a description of the "hardships and goals " If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please let me know Sincerely, 4, Howard Polski "1997 HOT CONCEPT" "BEST BBQ JOINT IN THE TWIN CITIES" "BEST BBQ RIBS" Nations Restaurant News Mpls/St Paul magazine Minnesota Monthly Reader Poll FAMOUS DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC 7279 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRE IErE MN 55344 (612) 833-9300 FAx (612) 833-9301 www famousdaves com • • • HISTORY, HARDSHIPS AND GOALS During Famous Dave's initial consideration of the present building site, we were aware that the visibility of our building would be a challenge, particularly for cars traveling from the west towards Stillwater With our building well past the Greeley intersection, and with cars approaching that intersection at speeds of 50 mph or more, we knew strong signage would be vital As we proceeded to the design and city approvals phase, we found ourselves making many compromises regarding our signage and building's exterior, each time reassuring ourselves that Stillwater is a wonderful market, and we can overcome the challenges of poor visibility Now, having been open since July, we have found we were wrong Our sales are well below our expectations, and we hear countless stories of people dnving by who cannot see us Our carryout sales are also well below our norm — no doubt hindered by people who cannot see the restaurant, or see us after they've passed, eliminating most impulse traffic The simple fact is we need the city's help We understand the city's stnngent design requirements to maintain the "purity" and "integrity" of the downtown historic district We applaud those efforts However, we sincerely believe that Highway 36 — a world apart from the downtown district in every way -- should be judged differently, and respectfully ask those charged with protecting the beauty of Stillwater to take that into consideration, as well as the economic value of a prospering business -- paying taxes and employing Stillwater residents Famous Dave's continues to believe that our Stillwater location can be an excellent one In addition to our willingness to invest in signage and neon banding to improve our visibility, we are prepared to make further investments in the property to better serve our Stillwater customers Our plans include the remodeling of the dining room, including the addition of a comfortable bar/waiting area, and converting our current counter service to full -service We believe such a conversion could result in the hiring of 10-20 or more employees — undoubtedly, with many of these individuals from Stillwater In closing, our guests must be able to see us and find us We believe the building identifiers we have proposed, consisting of signage and neon banding, is reasonable Along with the simplicity of the neon banding, the signage has been designed to be as "clean" and "crisp" as possible, with no pigs or other art that some might find objectionable Thank you for your consideration • • cpc444 ter \p THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA (v� l \(31 S<( 4>5)() 6\j N ' Q.\e,,), April 1, 1998 \ �l' off' RE VARIANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW \ Dear Property Owner The City of Stillwater has received a request from Doug Lanham, Famous Dave's of America, Inc , for a variance to the sign ordinance for additional signage (3) at 14200 60th Street North in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District Case No V/DR/98- 23 The Planning Commission will be considering this case at a public hearing on Monday, April 13, 1998 at 7 p m in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street If you have any comments or concerns regarding this request, please attend the meeting All persons wishing to be heard in reference to this request will be heard at this meeting Steve Russell Commun'ty Development Director Enclosure CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612 439 6121 5.1? .'s^ % I. ti } r')1$ 'g ] e�t'1 m�aw, t w t- g� 1, ; P� 7 h G e}..Y �.. � � r }�un'c� �G l ia..y 1k c r ' Xv :9 .asj r1` r °'' I'' `'' I , ' s 14- 1 1 t. 4 y t ' r ? !1 T -w r.. ' • fi „ 2 >t`t xVia 7.1066) �".. r�...�. r _„ 7 " �i�4kr �fd'ti 4 a f13S�c. t- , , „� ". ' }e.,$rq' L y ..y .� rr �• � s ` " ' re. A y:174may+ �.,4' J7'i' .464r_*� F Vi_ f �-l��r C l� 4M14..,ilFri fi a 03p-lu .prv, i �r t�PfoSf�� io r • • • • • 4 t. • .,,,, 0:,„,:t,..3.:„tiei,,;,,,,,,tt 1: f'-.3•,,,-kgrt.:' '...,:- 1: ?' V.Y:kriri.;;.:.,,,.."1,riM;::,../262):::::,7f- • • .:-; '4 T.- ' 1_,:°) , _ .,.....- .,.../ r * . .41.• 4 r '.1.,... Vit, 4... ".111 ,. .011 / ". p',,„--,rh,t, , 14_4,, 4--, ( ,.- "4; A.&itp,Ate,-6A), 5 ",-"li ' r..-,4 fill tite: '4 -4 , I N. 4. , r ,--1' %WW1'. r'fi AIN ,,yls Tr fh;:441i+k tikei; V 44s,' r P,C Vt‘j'AIL h? r•r!'r rIg Nvir arat—t Z 1. ,tArrir r'LT " i. cr'" 3,,V1 yft7 1141-4.4-4e4,-":41? C MV1713175kr,r1,4:4,-, 1.4 — Dr. )0.,--"Q•, tif qgw"i4L 17'-t4C20)3•'''.r:4_ ,,r,Ailtro • li I , LL - � I / L _ — r, 1 T 3 S1GI4 LITE 1•1 5 o f,)(Ro t3Y D) CAN L -TTE , w/ wuET-E. R€Ka > 31 4"x 23=Co" (18 2(0 SF) 1 — - rl� 1_1_1T1 1 FLF-1-I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 11 1 I I I 1 1 I 1• 1 1 1 1 1 ,-11-1 1 1 L 1�1� 1 1 I 1 1 I_ L I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T I I r l l I 1 Lr_L.r L 1 1 1_ 1 _.1__ wy 111 K I / a r I 1 11 11111 / --- - /-- —r / / / - / z- - / - - e.x?os Eb g. sy RE. D HECN4 PooF i3A4t>1 41 Al UPPV-I- LowE12. 1zooF FACIA I I I t F - 1 _ _ J $A�KC�r sIEoo (12-usi Rv.t) CAN L.E.Tro.24 w/ wt.lyte FLEX, FACE 14-L o " (2.1 SF)} 6.ft F s 13AcacL1T iJ Eom ('Ru 1Vf g ) CA/4 LETTER-4 w ( wN 11TE PL 1 FACE_ ��wnX 14-I oII (21 r7F 1 '( , ' EXro sab g v gY ��� N N -, 7 cF �APJbfac1 AT 0 P- 4 jE)LoER. ''eoF rAc.4A'5 1 II 11 I _!1 r v Mt 41111MMESIIIIIMIIMBIMINNI =mem Etl•I; onmaimmins1��� =m �� 1 _IIi ������ � �� �mmuLi/m I 1 I l 1 1! I �/NE au I I ! I I I1 I I I r-Lr-^! A 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L, 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 L I I 1 1 I I 11 11_ 1 1 I 1 1 [ 1 T I YYYYIAII•IMINIMINEMMI ammo imeminom ---- ---- 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 i I I I T �I i` l I 1 ) I 1 1'4 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I L 1 l_ 1 I 1 1 1 1 L 1 L I L t 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I ' 11 1 L 1 1�1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1-1 1111 1-1 1 [ 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1L1llhIi1111I111111I111111111111111111 l 1 1 1 t 1 _1 1 1 1 1 1 l_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1'1111 II 111111 1I111111I11111I11111 ` 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 I_ 1 I 1 1 1 1 Il1_fI1I1IIIIIIII 1 I I I I I I I L_I_�111I11I11I11111111111111111I1I 1 1 III 1 __LliiL 1 1 t 1_I i r — 1 1 1 1 1 1`111'1'1 1 111 lI 11111 1111 =11111=1111MMIONIIIMENII -------- r 4J rs ar a 5i-1 (1 waciEr__ M 1 /*4_, /9/$ (444e/tP2; (/ • • LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL D Lakeview Hospital s Mission is to deliver superior quality service in cooperation with others to meet the diverse healthcare needs of individuals families and communities of the St Croix Valley March 5, 1998 Mr Gerald Fontaine Plaruung Commission, City of Stillwater 216 N Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr Fontaine I would appreciate an opportunity in the near future to meet with the planning commission to review Lakeview's conceptual plans in regard to expanding parking for the hospital My goal would be to share details on current properties owned by Lakeview and our preliminary thoughts in respect to the potential use of these properties I would also hope to get input from the Planning Commission on how to resolve parking problems and meet residential needs of the neighborhood Please contact me at your earliest convenience to let me know when such a meeting could be arranged I am hoping this can be accomplished within the next few weeks I can be reached at 430-4502 Thank you, I look forward to our discussion JJR/rs 927 West Churchill Street • Stillwater • Minnesota 55082 • Phone 612-439 5330 • Fax 612430-4528 • Home Page www lakeview org