Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-18 CPC Packet1water, THE BIRTH PLACE OF MINNESOTA November 13, 1991 THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER i8, 1991 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 21.6 NORTH FOURTH STREET. AGENDA Approval of Minutes - October 14, 1991. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Case No. V/91-51 - A continuation of a Variance to the sideyard setback requirements for construction of a garage on a corner lot (3u feet required, 17 feet requested) and to the size requirements for an accessory structure (1,000 feet required, 1,003 feet proposed) at 317 North Owen Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Donald Hill, Applicant. 2. Case No. V/91-50 - V/91-53 - A continuation of two Variances for the placement of a pylon sign and a free-standing sign at 110 South Greeley Street. The property is located in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Melissa Johnson and Heidi Rosebud, Applicants. 3. Case No. SUP/91-55 - A Special Use Permit to maintain a cougar (undomesticated animal) on a residential property within the City of Stillwater. The property is located at 1251 West Orleans Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Richard Sowers, Applicant. 4. Case No.SUB/91-57 - A 10 foot by 135 foot Minor Subdivision of Lot 13, Block 11, to Lot 14, Block 11 of Ciiurchi l l , Nelson and S1 aughter' s Addition. Lot 13, Block 11, is located at 1020 South Fifth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Dennis and Marge Galowitz, Applicants. 5. Case No. PUD/91-58 - A Planned Unit Development for the construction of two duplex units (four single family units with zero sideyard setbacks). The property is located at 310 North Second Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District, Downtown Plan area. BARK Properties, Applicant. 6. Case No. SUB/91-60 - Resubdivision of three lots of 25,984 square feet into four residential lots of 5,835, 5,232, 4,799, 4,799 and common area of 5,319 square feet at 310 North Second Street in the Duplex Residential District. BARK Properties, Applicant. Case No. SUP/V/91-59 - A Special Use Permit and Variance for the construction of a multi -purpose addition to St. Mary's Church with a street sideyard setback of 21 feet (thirty feet required). The property is located at 407 South Fifth Street i'n the RB, Two Family Residential District. Richard N. Olsen and Richard L. Huelsmann, Applicants. NOTE: PLEASE CALL SHIRLEY, 439-6121, IF YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS MEETING. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Date: October 14, 1991 Time: 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman Angela Anderson, Gene Bealka, Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott, Gary Funke, Rob Hamlin, and Don Valsvik Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director Ann Pung-Terwedo, City Planner Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Don Valsvik to approve the minutes of September 9, 1991, as submitted. Seconded by Duane Elliott. All in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. V/91-40 - This hearing is continued from the August meeting. James Waters, the applicant, stated that the original sign plan was more horizontal and would have intruded into County right-of-way. The sign was reevaluated and a more verti-cal sign was designed. The sign would be placed on the property line, which is 30 feet from Greeley Street. The applicant wants to avoid placing the sign in the parking lot. The sign would name the office tenants on the second floor. The first floor retail tenants have signage on the building. There are three recommended conditions of approval. The applicant asked that condition number one requiring 40% of the area of the sign be used for the center name be changed to 30-40% of the sign area. The Commission agreed with this request, and also agreed that a fourth condition be added requiring street addresses on all main level doors (in five -inch letters), and that the door to the second level list all the suite numbers on the second level. Motion by Gary Funke to approve the variance request, amending condition No. 1 and adding a fourth condition as discussed, with final approval of the sign by the Community Development Director. Seconded by Rob Hamlin. All in favor. Case_ No. _V/91-50 - A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of a 28 square foot free-standing sign for a retail use at 110 South Greeley Street. The case was presented along with Case No. V/91-53. Case No. V 91-53 - A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of an 85 square foot pylon sign, 18 feet in height, at 1 Stillwater Planning Corttraission Minutes October 14, 1991 110 South Greeley Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist. Heidi Rosebud, owner of the building, presented the request. Case No. V/91-50 is a request by an individual tenant of the building. Case V/91-53 is a request for a sign identifying the building and the tenants. Steve Russell explained that a sign program had been adopted for the building in 1987. The building now has a new owner and new uses for the building. Ms. Rosebud explained that she is the new owner of the building and she has renovated the inside of the building and brought it up to code. She now wishes to update the outside of the building with new signage. She stated that her customers have difficulty locating her building because of the lack of adequate signage. She stated that another purpose for the pole sign in the parking lot would be to help light the parking lot at night, when most of her customers use the parking lot. She has talked to most of the neighboring residents who have no objection to the lighted sign. The light would be turned off at 10 P.M. Members of the Commission felt that the sign was oversized and too commercial for a residential district. There was discussion regarding alternative signage programs, such as signage on the building with directional lights. Mike McCarthy, 212 S. Greeley St., three houses away from the hii i 1 rl i nrT i- i-Pri that hP FPP 1 G a 1 i cihi- Pa nvI nn 5 i an i s not appropriate for a residential neighborhood. Staff has recommended that the pole sign be denied and that the applicant be requested to work with staff on a building sign program before any new signs are approved. Motion by Don Valsvik to accept the staff recommendation and request that the applicant work with staff in developing a new sign program to be presented to the Commission at the November 18 meeting. Seconded by Duane Elliott. All in favor. casc� No._ - V/A��1 - The applicant has requested a continuance to the November meeting because he is out of town at this time. Motion by Gary Funke to continue Case No. V/91-51 to November 18. Seconded by Angela Anderson. All in favor. Ca e No. v 9 -5 - A Variance to the Sign ordinance for additional signage on a commercial retail establishment which includes 24 inch channel letters on the rear building facade, and 2 another additional sign mounted on a free-standing pylon. The property is located at 14304 North 60th Street in the BP-C District. Mike Dimond, cardinal Development, presented the application. He presented pictures for the Commission's review and stated that customers, especially those eastbound on Highway 36, cannot locate the Tires Plus store. He also stated that channel letters on the west side of the building would make the building appear less industrial in nature. The Commission members agreed that the business already exceeds the number of signs and total square footage allowed in the auto center, and therefore, cannot be granted two additional signs. It was suggested that the tire brand name signs be removed from the east side of the building and that one additional sign be allowed. Motion by Rob Hamlin to approve the Variance request with three conditions: 1) Remove the tire brand name signs from the east side; 2) Allow 24 inch channel letters on the west side; 3) No additional pylon signage allowed. Seconded by Glenna Bealka. All in favor. Case No. SIJP 91-54 - A Special Use Permit for a residential use on the second level of a commercial structure at 125 South Main Street in the Central Business District. Kathleen Granger presented the application. She requested that the second level of the building be converted to a 1,000 sq. foot apartment on the east side of the building. There will be a separate entrance to the apartment in accordance with the building code. There will be no changes made to the outside of the building. There will be parking required for only one vehicle. There are two recommended conditions of approval, the first being a list of building and fire code requirements. Motion by Rob Hamlin to approve the special use permit with the conditions as listed. Seconded by Gary Funke. All in favor. OTHER St, Croix Riverway View stuff`lyLEx-istinrs--_C�nr�it3.ons - Ann Pung-Terwedo explalined that in 1989 a lawsuit was brought against the City by the DNR for granting a variance to the bluffland/shoreland ordinance for the construction of an addition to a home at 120 Lakeside Drive. The DNR has now requested that the City conduct a view study of Stillwater from the St. Croix River. The Coriffftission viewed a videotape of the view of Stillwater front the St. Croix River. Next month, the Commission will discuss regulations. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. 3 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/91-51 Planning Commission Meeting: October 14, 1991 Project Location: 317 North Owen Street Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential Zoning District: RB Applicant's Name: Donald Hill Type of Application: Variance. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A variance to the sideyard setback requirements for the construction of a garage (30 feet required, 17 feet requested) and to the size requirements for an accessory structure (1,000 square feet required, 1,008 square feet proposed). DISCUSSION: The request is to tear down an existing house and replace it with a 28 foot by 30 -Foot garage, seventeen feet from the side property line. The garage will accommodate the residential home located on the same lot facing North Owen Street on which there is presently no garage on the site. However, there is a 21 foot by 32 foot slab which does accommodate off-street parking for the site. The proposed garage is larger than what is allowable for accessory structures on a residential lot. The garage could be reduced in size and still provide adequate space for the truck and working area. The other off-street parking slab should also be removed. The 17 foot area between the garage and the street is large enough to park cars. The Parking Ordinance limits two parking spots per dwelling unit, one of which is covered. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The garage size shall be reduced to 1,000 square feet. 2. The slab area next to the home shall be removed and sodded. 3. All roof drainage from the garage shall remain on site. RECOMMENDATION: Approval- as conditioned. FINDINGS: The proposed use as conditioned will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1'Ak: IOU Caso Number��_ Fee Paid CASE NU14BER Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE f=O UI Street Location of Property: __________ Logal Description of Property: Owner: Name __ au� ���___ �..��----------------------------------- Address ----------- Phone: Applicant (if other than owner): Name---_-W_---w-__--_-----_--__-___ Address ------------------------------- Phone: --------------- Type of Requestc ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat ___ Spocial Use Permit __- Approval of Final Plat AVariance ___ Other -------- ------- Description or Request: __�+'�C __.[.L�__���� £'__ ��------- ---- _0_r_c� - )�u Signature of Applicant: - 2--------------------- Date of Public Hearing: --_------..----------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on p } f=�tiis iorm or at. tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. a`��"► 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. Iso K 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. �Yp 4. Dimensions of proposed structure.' r`/ -' 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.!n 7. Other information as may be requested. C � Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ----------- (dote) subject to the following conditions: ____________________________________ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the following conditions; ------------------------------------------------ Comments: (Use other side), In addition to my house,I have a second house on my lot.I want to remove this second house and replace it with a two car garage of dimensions 28'x36'.I plan to remove the complete structure and concrete slab.Due to existing landscape this house each spring is flooded to a level which soaks the carpet inside the house.It is my plan to have the new garage slab to be 8" higher than present.y also plan to build the new garage with a ceiling height of 9' to equal that of my house.Access to my garage will be from LINDEN ST,with a concrete driveway 17'long and full width of garage. I have two other basic needs for this garage,inside storage/protection and the additional off street pa.rking.In the past I have owned boats, ry vehicles and presently snowmobiles.All these pieces of equipment were stored off my property when not in use which is an inconvenience when you wish to use them.Not only inconvenient DEC.1989 rriy 1988 Arctic Cat and double wide trailer were stolen from my yard the night before a trip to northern Minnesota.This past summer a. bicycle belonging to my brother was also stolen from my yard. Secondly, having a two car garage would increase off street parking from two spaces for presently six vehicles to four spaces for four vehicles. I see this as the most ideal situation for use of my lot and to help keep my vehicles out of harms way when not in use. variance. I wish to thank you for considering this proposal for a (��) . ll �, �j 61-�-CD�L -1- i � I 'I•• y•q til37 if JJ .'' �. r � '1 ' � '�� !- .... Srµ i� �k. : �• .Y;'''�I NN 'ti., - ..�,�'� ill �. r , •'-1r5S 'J �'1r 4• L j ice. ,��4C �' V��'{�•.t �-� Il�i[� I F r ;�5,�s^ . ; �Y .. -1 � �r � ,, ::: �'w.' • :.r G �'ra . ,f j...,.r','-7r ; 'ii e' t '. rf•'�il , 7.;' f / i I- . i I •' Y. $AS. � „�,�.. ,�6Z.k.''r>` •':�`:1. n �L71 's+r± . J' - ';� � -� iRi � t ss 4i"�:1•rr.��F.'A i i` g� y�.;�j-r., •, _ .4. -'3C i�•tis 1 �• SY'►1''-:i �i3'r 5ry�` 1 • 1 l -•... �. r -�. 1-'�-fir'. ,�r .. E I .,l�]'�i'�fi r�j�.r 22 FT -F-- 11 FT �28 FT� N 0 R T H 0 W E N S S T R E E T WEST LINDEN STREET 138 FEET 28 X 36 = 1008 SO. FEET EXTENDED CAB PICKUP 19'9" 5 FEET NSP POWER POLE WEST LINDEN STREET N water THE BIRTH PLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 1991 SUBJECT: CONTINUED CASES - V/91-53 and V/91-50, SIGN PROGRAM FOR STILLWATER FITNESS CLUB BUILDING This item was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 14, 1991 and continued to this meeting to consider additional building Sign Program options. The proposal is a building Sign Program. All existing signs would be removed with the placement of (2) forty nine square foot internally illuminated signs. The two proposed signs would be located on the Greeley Street (east) side of the building and the Myrtle Street side (north) of the building. Beside "Fitness Center" signage, all other building signage would be'on the two signs. RECOMMENDATION: Design a Sign Program. ATTACHMENT: - Proposed sign plans - October 14, 1991 Planning Meeting. - Staff Report. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 IPA Pal �ro Ay,5le- 4--ao-kc.A T") s(4Pip 0 Bay�� 0oo a{ ,mooX fa -Trig si"h/ ,,Zip�o PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUP/91-55 Planning Commission Meeting: November 18, 1991 Project Location: 1251 West Orleans Street Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Residential Zoning District: R-A Applicant's Name: Richard Sowers Type of Application: Special Use Permit Project Description: Special UsePermitto maintain a cougar (undomesticated animal) on a residential property within the City of Stillwater. Background: On August 6, 1991, the Stillwater City Council passed an Ordinance requiring that persons obtain a Special Use Permit to maintain wild animals within the City of Stillwater. The purpose of this Ordinance was to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Stillwater from undomesticated animals. By requiring the Special Use Permit process, each wild animal request can be reviewed on a case basis. A review can then be made on each specific animal, if it posses a danger or nuisance to the community or if it is well cared for. Findings then can be made if the animal can live in harmony within the urban environment. The Ordinance, as attached, contains submission requirements that are used for review of wild animal cases. (Attachment A). DISCUSSION: This request is to maintain a cougar on a residential property at 1251 W. Orleans Street. This cougar, known as Ziggy, is a two year old male and weighs over one hundred pounds. The site on which the cougar resides is a large residential lot approximately one acre in size. The location of the confinement space for the cat is setback approximately one hundred feet from the street lot line and twenty feet from the side property line. Trees and brush buffer the site to the east and north. The present confinement space for the cougar is small. A tarp is used as a roof for the area. The cage area is made of metal fencing with a swing gate. Mr. Sowers plans to build a new confinement space which is later described in this report. The issue of noise has been a problem at this location for the past two years according to police reports. These issues are outlined and appear to be tile area of greatest concern. There have been no confirmed reports of tine animal injuring a person or any acts relating to the health and safety of the public. Many residents and non-residents of Stillwater support the cougars residence in the City of Stillwater believe that its well cared for. A petition with over 400 signatures (residents and non-residents) was submitted to the City in support of the cougar. On t'rre other hand, some neighbors feel threatened by 1 the cougar with its yelling and screaming. Some residents have been frightened to see Ziggy in the City parks. This Special Use Permit request reviews the cougar moused on the property at 1251 West Orleans Street. It deals with the safety of the public from a wild animal and the ways in which the cougar can live in harmony with the neighborhood. This permit also considers the cougar in public areas of the City. The City Council must ultimately decide whether the cougar is a potential hazard to the public.'This issue is dealt with in the conditions of approval. OVERVIEW OF THE COUGAR: The next section outlines reviews issue areas stated in the Wild Animal Ordinance and general issues relating -to zoning and Special Use Permits to the cougar, including confinement, insurance, and impacts to the neighborhood: FEDERAL AND STATE PERMITS: The on y permit required -Tor a cougar is from the game farm where it was purchased. This game farm is licensed with the DNR (Attachment ). There are no other public health agencies or state agencies which issue permits or inspect wild animals. However, a program of veterinary care must be established under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Attachment D). BILL OF SALE: The game farm registration is also the Bill of Sale (Attachment B). EXISTING CONFINEMENT SPACE AND WASTE: The twenty toot by eleven foot confinement area is shown on the site plan along with the location of the new confinement space (Attachment C). This new space will be a twenty one foot by sixteen foot structure with a six foot, ten inch cage height with a roof. An eight foot high perimeter fence will then surround the area three feet from the cage structure. There will also be scattered doors in the perimeter fence to the structure for additional security of the animal. The floor of the pen will be cement which can be cleaned easily. The applicant has stated he removes all fecal waste from the site. Mr. Sowers plans to start cun7,trucLiurl w Lhin Lhe hexL month. QUALIFIED VETERINARIAN CARE: Ziggy has been taken care of by Dr. Matthew Sturmer, Parkview Cat Clinic, of Mendota Heights (Attachment D). According to the file, all vaccinations are up-to-date. PROOF OF INSURANCE: Triere has been a � ,000,000 general liability policy issued by the Lester Kalmanson Agency, Inc. of Maitland, Florida. The confirmation of insurance has been submitted to the City of Stillwater (Attachment E). We are in the process of receiving the full conditions of the policies. NUISANCE COMPLAINTS: From Marc O to August 6, 1991, sixteen incidents were reported at their residence at 1251 W. Orleans involving the cougar (Attachment F). Thirteen of these were noise related nuisances. Five tickets were issued. One incident involved a possible injury which was not confirmed. 2 PROPERTY OWNER PERMISSION: As h this review, the property owners of 1251 W. Orleans have not submitted written permission to allow this use to occur on the property. Planning Application Review Case No. SUP/91-55 Page Three CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1, he cougar shall remain inside its confinement space at all times. Outside the confinement space, on the property, the cougar shall be on a leash handled by an adult. 2. The cougar shall not be allowed to walk the streets of Stillwater, or be allowed in City parks or on City property, without prior approval from the City Council. 3. A detailed structural plan of the new confinement space shall be submitted to the Stillwater Building Inspector for approval before building permits are issued. The owner shall submit a completion date for construction of the confinement space, but no later tnan May 15, 1992. 4. The confinement space shall be locked with an approved lock and secured at all times. 5. Mr. Sowers shall submit a yearly medical care report and vaccination record to the City Planner. 6. No other cougar or wild animals are allowed on the premises. 7. The Special Use Permit shall be reviewed by the City Council on an annual basis. F. Written approval by the property owner to maintain the cougar on the site shall be submitted before City Council review of this request. 9. This Special USe Permit is non -transferable to any other tenant of the premises. 10. Any tickets issued on noise or other public safety matters relating to the cougar shall be reviewed by the City Council for possible Special Use Permit revocation. 11. The City Planning Staff shall make periodic inspections to determine if these conditions are being met. RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned. FINDINGS: Tnis proposed use of a wild animal on residential propeerty will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to public welfare if all conditions of this approval are met. ATTACHMENTS: A - E. 4 VAl: IUU CASE NUMBER Caso Fee Paid _2-0 -- __-____- Date Filed ___ 01-ImAol-___ PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: Z 4/�� Logal Description of PrProporty:---------------------------------------- Owner: Name ___ ='� �1 __ So CJ __...__________.._____--__ Address /ZS/ _�.f�.,, �ju�/L Phone:i ss-os� Applicant (if other than owner): Name --------------------------------- Address ------------------------------ Phone: __________-____ Typo of Request:- 'azoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat _Y_ S ecial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat P ___ Variance ___ Other _____-_____________ Description of Request: -- /-2- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Signature of Applicant; 4,2-2u- .. �---�� Date of Public Nearing: _-____.._-__------__...___--____________________ NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. t 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (duce) subject to the following conditions. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the following conditions: __w� ._'___w..____________________________________ Comments: (Use other side), N 5-4ac k ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO. 746 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 27.01, SUBDIVISION 15 SUBPARAGRAPHS 1 AND 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: 1. Amending. The City Code of the City of Stillwater is hereby amended by adding the following sections that shall hereafter read as follows: "Chapter 27.01, Subd. 15, Subsection 1. Wild Animals: _S ecial Use Permit Required. No person shall harbor, maintain or control a wild, dangerous or undomesticated animal within the City of Stillwater without first having been granted a Special Use Permit by the City Council. Subparagraph 2. A wild, dangerous or undomesticated animal shall be that which is not of a species customarily used as an ordinary house pet, but one which would ordinarily be confined to a zoo, or one which would ordinarily be found in the wilderness of this or any other country, or one which otherwise causes a reasonable person to be fearful of bodily harm or property damage. Fish and birds are not included in this definition." Subparagraph 3. The application shall be made on a form provided by the City Clerk and shall be administered in the same manner and according to the procedure that applies to all other Special Use Permits provided for in the Stillwater City Code. Subparagraph 4. In addition to the submittal requirements required for Zoning Special Use Permits, the application must contain or be accompanied by the following information: A. Copies of all Federal and State permits that are required by law. B. A copy of the Bill of Sale or Receipt for the purchase of the animal. C. A statement of the amount of money or other consideration paid by the applicant for ownership of the animal. D. A complete and detailed description and diagram of the confinment space proposed for the animal. E. Written proof that a qualified veterinarian has committed to the owner to provide care to the animal and to advise the owner regarding its care. F. Proof of insurance together with an underwriting memorandum stating knowledge of the exposure that will protect the public against bodily injury or death caused by the animal providing for limits of $1,000,000 per person, per occurrence and for notice to the City within 30 days of its cancellation or renewal. Subparagraph 5. In addition to the standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance for the grant or denial of a Special Use Permit, a permit may be denied for failure to satisfy any submittal requirement set forth above, for failure to provide a safe and sanitary confinement space for the animal; or if it is likely that the animal will bark, howl or cry in a manner that will disturb the neighbors. Subparagraph 6. The Permit, if granted, shall not permit the breeding of the animal. Subparagraph 7. The Permit may be revoked by the City Council after a hearing preceeded by 10 days notice, if the animal becomes a nuisance or a danger to any person, if any condition of approval of the Permit is violated, if any other law or lawful rule is violated or if the health, safety and welfare of the public is threatened. And, a new Subd. 18 is added that shall read as follows: "Subd. 18. In addition to the other remedies and penalties provided in the ordinance, city officials, after approval of the City Council, are authorized to file appropriate civil actions for a temporary restraining order, temporary injunction or permanent injunction against any person violating this Ordinance." 2. Saving. In ail other ways the Stillwater City Code shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council the 6th day of August , 1 991 . - ia4 Wally Mrahamson, Mayor ATTEST: Mary Lru Johns o , Clerk Publish : October 10, 1991 _. �......>�.,.issxa.rx..c:.zz��.s..:;:;xt�•._.. ---..__.•-__. ».'.7._�. :s'. ..rk�`_�......a[".in..:.._.�—' of A d�dmic. of WOW W66i fti ' ,ATTACHMENT B Of Pvlbibq bf h914 ANb WILbLIP1 M• 1.»:.. M1 T� �Yffib SOLO A '-.LJt�Mii uhnbsf:� A re Prodiplfiali R.ul1„ y"� 7� i + Lirin� No, 6i FurChliiF 3.- 4 `i! iold:,f T4 � a �MwAd ,# i eo: 47, SW e.. ayow,1td,'JL PW Wa4021 . �. • : �:Y `CLUE Cb0Y.,*t0CAL CONS9�L{ k BIN 6A.z = ;'�"; •,. [� tib.. . ATTACHMENT C 5-40c k ATTACHMENT D f.. United States Animal and Regulatory Wrth Contral Scctor Department of ' Plant Health Enforcement Butler Squaru, Au01n 625 Agriculture Inspection and Animal 100 N. 61h Street Service Care Minneapulls, MN' S540:1. 1,)811 PRQGRAM OF VETERINARY CARE A PROGRAM OF VETERINARY CARE (PVC) HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BETWEEN: Licensee/Registrant ame Business Name USDA tense/ eg s ra on um er ai ng ress ZI ty btate Lip Coae. to -unD one Number(Home) one Number (Business) Ae erinarian nit a e icense Number Business-Addrets L 2� �04Q. nn city Q State Z i p a e one Numuer (business The Animal Welfare Regulations, Title 9, Subchapter A, Part II, Subpart C, Section 2.33, Subpart D, Section 2.40 and Part III, Subpart F, Section 3.110 require a Program of Veterinary Care (see Pages 5 and 6). The attending veterinarian shall establish, maintain and supervise programs of disease control and prevention, pest and parasite control, pre -procedural and post -procedural care, nutrition, euthanasia and adequate veterinary care for all animals on the premises of the 'licensee/registrant. A writtgn program of adequat veterinary care between the licensee/registrant and the doctor of veterinary medi cine shall be established and reviewed on an annual basis. By law, such programs must include regularly scheduled visits to the premises by the veterinarian. Scheduled visits are required to monitor animal health and husbandry. Pages or blocks which do not apply to the facility should be marked N/A. If space provided is not adequate for a specific topic, additional sheets may be added. The completed form is to be sent to the Sector Office. The veterinarian and licensee/registrant 'should retain a copy for their files. I have read and completed this Program of Veterinary Care, and understand my responsibilities. Regularly schedufied visits by the veterinarian will occur at the following frequency: (minimum annua a f� Signature ot Licensee/Registrant Date / P - - Az /l %;/Grgnature etetiarl ate AP111S Pmti•c lino Amenc an Ayncullum USDA APPROVED BY: _fACONIF'IRMe:�Y10N OF— r f I� -X- X xc -X- -X- -m- ac -X- I*- -I*- X- -X 46 -3 X- -3* -iK X- -X- -X- -X- -m- Al.at:,:NCN: L..EE-')TE_R 1•1::AL.MANi" ON AGENCY I NC: ` 6 7 y MA I "I"LAIN Avt_ 0 w'. d � �w MAY"!'L..ANtJ, F Lt�t=:tX]A ��:7'���I•—c;rc:rr;r;� lJ. �. A. � �� ��'�� FAX: 401-645-.2810 r)ATla;.. 1 r-'OL.Ii ;Y/C:EF:T. : +;L'.3X)` ;X N (+:::+;::t;]I✓X)FaNi;::lc. WITH YOUR I N 1-RU+: T I ONS WE_ }LAVE? r_F-FEC 1'ED '•f I••Ir F i7I_L oW Il�� J:I�ISI.1r::l1Ni C�" C:0VEF:A1._JE. 1-1--i rIRE%IUUM FOR "I"}'11S' IIV il.1r:AN+=:C: IS I'tJEE- 61ND F-'AYAK.E Af.::, 01 '1"FEE A•1'"X_nC:1--IMI_-NT i)ATI,:.IJI'dl.••f�4��"3 f.)'I'}IL::I�;W;Cw�f_ Af'.'I :t::E'X). NAMED F:t;:::HllRD ;30WEPrG WEST iJr;;"[-EANS ;JTREET ST I L_L_ WATC:P:, MN `,`;c:r82 1 N9L.JI:<ED LOC:A"! TON: SAME AS ABOVE PERICID OF IN >UP,':ANCE: Fk:f,'Iv. 10/XCr/':1J TO: Itr11�>/'� (ANNUAL) (1--'(0TH DAYS FIROM 12: r:r1 1.111 LOCAL s'rANUAPD TX11E) 01"' I nISURANE::s,W . (-GENE r,:AL.. L.1: AD I L.I TY FOR 1 C:000:iAP,' AV A "7I6ay" FIC)L.I i'N FL'?NM. (]WNIFI.RS' , L..AN1)L.0l DS. TENANT 3 `-QR,M L.. I I"11 T Of" I.. I AF111_- I TY: s 1 , UcrcD, (;Joo PEr: C)+`:r /A+- X)i. X)U+::•"I" T X:il .l'; . $1 , ;'750() . CXD B I / r:'X) PE-j"i, CLAIM f='r F'M X'UM 3 $ ON F• I LE WITH i :Af:F: I E}<: f TO F'C.JL_ X . Y TENI 15 , C.OND I T I f.)NS AND Wl.7F.X) I NQ ' + ADDITIONAL,. NONE AT I NC'':CF''; I UN . ' omivit`NTS. TNFUPR.AN+`:I;-' TO C:C3VFF: 1 C;0U+3Ar;' Al;l1 "1It�l,aY" I)0)3 :riJl_Y 1, 1':38'i'1, +;:,AI'-:} : I i=_1'? 1 Nf':3UP'ANF'E PLC'.: I IVT!n_nIDED AS EV;I: DEI\Jf";l THAT THE' I NISDUf'.ANt::E DESc.R,18ED [--IE:;I✓EUN1)1:; (;: I IN13 BEEN E'FI-ECTED AS STATEM . I ivilvIE'D I �A'I"r_ ADV I I: C V�iU'�i'! IrtE! GIVEN C•)i'- ANY D 1 �i%::l ;f :l '(a1V+;::[ EG, :E Nrif t:::lJ1 (yip I C:;:� t�f; IVC:�":�: 3�iFal ,"f + :HP Ner- HEL•. E;(`L.11 ANSIDN a/(9 0 DAVID MAWHORTER PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR POLICE CHIEF THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF POLICE m GORDON SEIM FIRE CHIEF Incidents involving the cougar at 1251 'A. Orleans St.: Date ICR 4/Type Action taken 1 3/28/90 90-2172 IR Information regarding cougar 2-8/24/90 J90-7714 IR " " to -�5/10/91 91-3481 IR Noise complaint - not heard by officer 5/25/91 91-3992 IR - ticket issued t" J 5/26/91 91-4018 IR " - not heard by officer 5/28/91 91-4076 IR " - ticket issued 5/28/91 91-4082 LE W - not heard by officer Y 5/30/91 91-4177 IR - (report not turned in) 5/31/91 91-4189 IR - not heard by officer �6/1/91 91 -421 6 IR - ticket issued 6/1/91 91-4239 IR - not heard by officer :6/2/91 91-4259 LE (U) - not heard by officer _6/6/91 91-4446 IR - ticket issued /a 6/10/91 91-4605 IR " - ticket issued ' 7/21/91 91-6097 IR Possible injury - not confirmed 10 8/6/91 91-6600 IR Noise complaint - not heard by officer 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Police Phone: 612-439-1314 or 612-439-1336 Fire Phone: 612-439-6120 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUB/91-57 Planning Commission Meeting: November 18, 1991 Project Location: 1020 South Fifth Street Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential Zoning District: R-B Applicant's Name: Dennis and Marge Galowitz Type of Application: Minor Subdivision PROJECT DESCRIPTION A 10 toot By foot minor subdivision of Lot 13, Block 11 to Lot 14, Block 11 of Churchill, Nelson and Slaughters Addition. D PP CIISSTnm The request is to subdivide a 10 foot wide strip of property froin one property, Lot 13, to another property, Lot 14. In this case, the additional ten feet of property will make the width of this lot meet the width requirements as stated in the Zoning Ordinance. However, the lot will remain a substandard lot at 6,750 square feet. The maximum lot size in the RB, Two Family Residential District is 7,500 square feet. The reduction of the ten feet on L6t 13 does not affect the structure on this lot. The home still meets the sideyard setback requirements for the RB District. FINDINGS: Tnis subdivision meets the purpose and intent of the Subdivision Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. �^ ATTACHMENTS: - Application Form - Survey Caso Numbo- do Fee Paid ---JM--__—_-- CASE NUMBER Data Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FOR.M Street Location of Property. __1020 South Fifth Street_ Stillwater _ Minnesota_55082 Logal Description of Property: b2..4�r..114.L_BlacltElevllLL�bursha.�1s Nelson & Slaughter's Addition to Stillwater Owner: Name _—Leslie PetersonF-aoIlLr�-,- -VzIL" ULIiain _La �12tL! on.,_ygt�dge_ Address -i -31. li&xtb-_ U 19-ti:ee� ...__- P%one:...._ __----_---_--_ Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Applicant (if other than owner): Name __ Dennis and Marge .Galowitz --------- Address _ 1020_South Fifth -Street ___— Phone: Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Typo of Request.- ___ Rezoning Approval •of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance _ X Other _Minor Subdivisionw-- Description of Request: reguest a Minor_Subdivision _ — — _to resolve —a boundary disLute__ Peterson/ sEerson own an ��roximatel.y ten, (10)•'- foot wide strip of Lot Fourteen (14), Block Eleven (11), Churchill, Nelson & Slaughter's Addition and they see7F( deed it to the Galowitz so the Galowitz own all o'T Lot Fourteen (14), Block Ele en (11), C u chil�l, Nelson Slaughter' Ad on llwater.. Signature o ppiic t .. _, Z Tracey A. lowa.tz r --- - Attaxney or I?ennis and Galowitz Data o, Public Hearin _ - •Y�,: • - NO EE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn. on ba,4I t03;,.t is iorm'or at- tached, showing the -following: i. North direction.2. t�•'���, �;;, Location of proposed structure on log. . • � S��L.4.:r�;. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. , G► ;1► �Z�S,It*fib �J 5. Street names. 6. Location o-f adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the•Planning Commission on (date) subject to the following conditions: ---------- ----------------------r------------------------------------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subjec: to the following conditions: -------- Comments: (Use other side), W lac C/Mw' / N LL Y ¢ m s c z o F v_~�e W> T LUee ffrr F a w o o z x<av Q <<.3] Z jCc I.L W C) (V q N O LO 3 O o �a a.., C7 V) Cl) a) c 07 C �L Iv M4� etl C ~ U 41 CI In c • r?'� iY •.] �li� o�Y -�kp -�6� .r �x mr•,Z- 9 Zl I V\ V I 1 v \ N ^ II � V h Q � O , Fo•p . er. rl�rr � h ; tiJos •»a 3— �L7COD ti LU j I V ; v f la� cwui Y V II '\ lk Q N � 3 � w Q h . •r, o v 3 u h V 1 �t� �t qVW`' Y•; it 0 w� t PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE N0. PUD/91-58 Planning Commission Meeting: November 18, 1991 Project Location: 310 North Second Street Comprehensive Plan District: Multi -Family Residential Zoning District: R-B Duplex Residential Applicant's Name: BARK Properties, Bob Briggs Type of Application: Planned Unit Development, PUD Project Description: A -Planned Unit Development for the construction of two duplex structures housing four single family attached dwelling units on five lots. Discussion: T'tie request is to construct two duplex structures, each housing two 1,436 square foot three bedroom residential units. The site is located in the Downtown Plan District Area and will require Design Review by the Heritage Preservation Commission (Dec,2i-,i1)er 1, �991). As a related action, the existing threw lot site is being resubdivided into four residential lots and one lot owned in common (SUB/91-60). The Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit process is being used for this relatively small half acre site because of the unique conditions including the existing retaining walls, shared access easement to the rear and the attached housing developed configuration. The proposal is for two units in one residential structure in the upper terrace of the site, Parcel B & C. The residential structure has a 12.67 feet and 14 foot sideyard setbacks and a 38 foot (Parcel B) and 45 foot (Parcel C) frontyard setback consistent with RB zoning regulations. Access to the site will be over a shared twenty foot access easement off of Mulberry Street. The north end of the access easement will provide space for a turn around and access to Lot 2 to the north of the project. Even though the lots face Second Street, access is not provided from Second Street because of the topography and retaining walls. The design of the proposed residences is similar to the design of some of the older residences io the area. A steep 12 foot x 12 foot pitched roof, lap siding and multi -pane windows. The design of the proposal will be reviewed by the Design Review Committee at their December meeting and comments and recommendations made to the City Council as a part of their review. Parcel D and C are proposed for a similar design duplex residential structure. Sideyard setbacks are shown at 10.6 feet. Again access to these residences would be by the rear driveway. Parcel A will be owned in common by the owners of parcels B, C, D and F and provide driveway access to all tree residences. The combined driveway is necessary because of the difference in elevation from Second Street to the lots. Maintenance of the drive will be shared by the property owners. The proposal is consistent with the Duplex Residential Density Standards and the zero interior sideyard setback is necessary to accommodate the attached townhouse design. RECOMMENDATION: ro Appva�—.____ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The esign of the proposal shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. (December 1, 1991) 2. The driveway width shall be a minimum of 12 feet and be paved. 3. The mature Maple Trees shall be maintained and protected during construction. 4. A copy of the covenants for maintenance of Parcel A shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. 5. The Subdivision Request (SUB/91-60) must be approved and subdivision recorded before building permits are issued. ATTACHMENT: Certificate of Survey and typical front elevation. BRUCE A. FOLZ & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVE. • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 * (612) 439-8833 October 28, 1991 LAND DESCRIPTIONS FOR ROBERT G. BRIGGS PARCEL A The West 20.00 feet of Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, and the East 25.00 feet of Lot 10 all in Block 16 of the Original City of Stillwater in the perfected plat of the CITY OF STILLWATER, recorded as Document No. 416049 in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. PARCEL B That part of Lot 3, Block 16 of the' Original City of Stillwater in the perfected plat of the CITY OF STILLWATER, recorded as Document No. 416049 in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota lying easterly of the West 20.00 feet thereof and lying northerly of the South 12.00 feet thereof. Subject to a walkway easement over the North 6.00 feet of the South 18.00 feet of the East 22.00 feet of said Lot 3 and over the North 16.00 feet of the South 34.00 feet of the East 5.00 feet of said Lot 3. PARCEL C That part of the South 12.00 feet of Lot 3, Block 16 of the Original City of Stillwater in the perfected plat of the CITY OF STILLWATER, recorded as Document No. 416049 in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota lying easterly of the West 20.00 feet thereof. Also, that part of the North 28.00 feet of Lot 4 of said Block 16 lying easterly of the West 20.00 feet thereof. Together with a walkway easement over the North 6.00 feet of the South 18.00 feet of the East 22.00 feet of said Lot 3 and over the North 16.00 feet of the South 34.00 feet of the East 5.00 feet of said Lot 3. ROBERT G. BRIGGS DESCRIPTIONS October 28, 1991 Page -2- PARCEL D That part of Lot 4, Block 16 of the Original City of Stillwater in the perfected plat of the CITY OF STILLWATER, recorded as Document No. 416049 in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota lying easterly of the West 20.00 feet thereof and lying southerly of the North 28.00 thereof. Also that part of the North 14.00 feet of Lot 5 of said Block 16 lying easterly of the West 20.00 feet thereof. PARCEL E That part of the Lot 5, Block 16 of the Original City of Stillwater in the perfected plat of the CITY OF STILLWATER, recorded as Document No. 416049 in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota lying easterly of the West 20.00 feet thereof and lying southerly of the North 14.00 feet thereof. f hvs:lu-'I ccrUfy th it V 3 SF;r,,,*v., was prepal -d b]vor Ij En.� �I.iry�.:� �� Uiirl "1• t':$ is :l,. Ci .,�,I' _,.�_.. .;'` GFiUCEA. FQL4 �a-z�-9, Date Reg. No. Qz3Z or p .... . . . .... - 77. PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUB/91-60 Planning Commission meeting: November 18, 1991 Project Location: 310 North Second Street Comprehensive Plan District: Multi -Family Residential Zoning District: R-B, Duplex Residential Applicant's Name: BARK PROPERTIES, Bob Briggs Type of Application: Resuddivision PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The request is to resubdivide tnree existing lots into five lots (four single family residential lots and one lot owned in common. Proposed lots are listed below: PARCEL NOS. Parcel A Parcel B Parcel C Parcel D Parcel E TOTAL AREA SQ. FT. 9 _._ 5,232 5,835 4,799 4,799 2� D TMFNSTnms 38.65x130.77 sq. 40.01x130.77 sq. 36.70x130.77 sq. 36.70x130.77 sq. USE Common Area ft. S.F. Residential ft. S.F. Residential ft. S.F. Residential ft. S.F. Residential 4 S.F. Residential The residential parcels do not meet the lot width requirements (50 feet) and Parcels D and E do not ineet the lot area requirements (5,000 square feet) but when a portion of the common area is added to each lot the 5,000 square foot area requirement is met. The Planned Unit Development process allows for flexibility in setbacks, and lot dimensions as long as the proposed use and intensity of use is consistent with density requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: The resubdivision is consistent with the zoning requirements and City Comprehensive Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The resubdivison sna]1 be filed with Washington County within six months. r Case Numbor �� U Fee Paid - CASE NUMBER Date Filed --------- PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINIS RATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: ..__-.-.._-..._----------------------- ____--- Logal Descriptioq, of Property, ____-_.._--_.,__--_____..___..__..___________ Owner, Name -------- _-..________________ Address _f .T klvrc t� ��ys ( 4.ti -------- Phone: __ ____________ Applicant (if other than owner): dame_--_____-_-__w___-____-_-_--_-__- Address------------------------------ Phone ---------------- Type of Requests- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance ` ___ Other ----------- ---_,__.. Description of Request _..__ �`/'�` _-- _Sr------ ' --_ `-- .- -- ______ -------------------------------------------- �,W- 77 Signature of Applicant: ______'__ �_=�.;,.r _v Date of Public Hearing: ______--____-__-_______-....__________.,___..___.. NOTE: `Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form or 'ached,at- tuh �iYln'T ti V fa�/11 V,I� ill~• b b• 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. � 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. �- 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. }'1 Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on _-- -_=_�� subject to the following conditions: __________________________.._________ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on following conditions: --------------------- ------------- subject to the ------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments. (Use other side), PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUP/V/9i-59 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: November 18, 1991 PROJECT LOCATION: 407-423 South Fifth Street COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Multi -Family Residential Zoning District: R-B, Duplex Residential APPLICANT'S NAME: Richard N. Olsen and Richard L. Huelsmann TYPE OF APPLICATION: Special Use Permit and Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS: Request is to construct a 40'x72', 2,880 square foot multi -purpose room, kitchen, related facilities and 15 car parking lot on existing church property and 75'x15O' adjacent corner lot. DISCUSSION: The proposal is to construct a 2,880 square foot multi -purpose room, kitchen and related facilities in addition to a 15 car parking lot to the existing St. Mary's Church Complex (refer to application and parish center project addition (Description attached). - The purpose for the addition is to provide expanded facilities for existing church activities that do not currently occur on the site. The improvement would also make the existing educational building as well as the addition accessible to the handicapped. The existing site is currently used for driveway and parking (on church property) and a family residence on the corner of Fiftii and Pine Streets. Tile existing residence would be removed to clear the site for development. A mature Maple tree on the southwest corner of the residential lot would remain as shown on the site plan. Circulation to the parking behind the existing church and addition would be provided by a one-way driveway off Fifth Street. The driveway would access the site north of the existing church run behind the church. Fifteen GO degree parking spaces with two designated for handicapped, next to the handicapped walkway to the church. The driveway would exit onto Pine Street mid -block between Fifth Street and Fourtri Street. The parking space closest to Pine Street is approximately ten feet from the Pine Street lot property line. An existing cyclone fence and proposed new cyclone fence would separate the site from residents to the rear. ANALYSIS Churches and related church uses require a Special Use Permit in the Duplex Residential R-B District. The purpose of the Special Use review is to ensure that the proposal is compatible with the dominant residential character of the area. The proposed project removes a single family residence and replaces it with an extension to the existing church. 1 The zoning requires a 30 foot setback from the Pine Street property line. The proposal shows a 21 foot setback. The multi -purpose addition as viewed from Pine Street is 24 feet tall. The site sits up from Pine Street increasing the apparent height of the building. The appearance of the multi -purpose building south elevation (viewed from Pine Street) is a flat, plain brick surface with no windows or other design detailing. This elevation is probably the primary public view of the site and additional architectural treatment should be considered to make this side of the building more interesting. The proposed site plan shows 15 additional parking spaces in 34' to 38' wide area behind the building. Sixty degree parking is proposed off a one-way driveway system. The minimal width for this type of parking arrangement is 36 feet and this does not allow space for snow storage. Also, the plan shows an existing chain link fence and new chain link fence separating the parking area from the residence to the rear. This does not allow for screening with a fence and bushes or hedges to soften the appearance and block headlights of tide parked cars from the residential areas. In residential districts, according to the Zoning Ordinance, parking lots are to be screened by a hedge or sightly fence or wall from the adjacent residential uses and located in back of street setback lines unless approved by the City Council. It is recommended that a different parking configuration be considered, possibly parallel parking, or mixed parallel and angle parking, so that adequate space can be provided for auto and pedestrian movement, parking, landscaping and snow storage on the church property. The site plan includes a conceptual landscape design. No ground cover is shown for the yard area around the Maple tree on Pine Street. A landscape plan showing plant location, type, and size should be submitted for approval. Lighting is proposed for the pedestrian areas. The location and design of lighting is not specified. FINDINGS: Based on the proposal and conditions of approval, the application shall not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in general harmony with the purpose of this Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The south elevation of the multi -purpose building shall be modified to provide architectural detail compatible with the design of the associated buildings. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted showing the plant type, size and location for all landscaped areas. Additional landscaping shall be added along Pine Street and ttie west and south yard areas sodded. 3. The parking plan shall be modified to provide adequate space for parking and a five foot buffer/screen/fence area between the parking lot and the residential property to the west. 4. The parking lot shall start behind the thirty feet required setback on Pine Street. 5. Any additional lighting shall be reviewed before building permits are issued to make sure it does not shine on the adjacent residences. 6. A demolition permit or building moving permit shall be obtained from the City before the existing residence is removed. ATTACHMENTS: - Application, plans and project description. 3 Caso Number _------___- Fee Paid -_-_-----_-_-_- CASE NUMBER Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property. _407_423 South -Fifth -Street/218_West-Pine Street — Lots - - -- - - ----- -------------- 8 through 12, Block 37, and Lot 7, Block 37, of the Original Town, logal Doscription of Property: now City of St: 17 ,::r.er Owner: Name --- Saint Marys Church --- ------------------------------- Address -- 407 South Fifth Street------------- Phone; ___439-1270 __-_-_ Applicant Of other than owner: Name _ Richard N_Olsr_nr Richard L. Huelsmann ----------- 1902 South Greeley Street Address ___Stillwater_Miru�esota-5508____-____ Phone• 439-5410/334-4535___ Typo of Recluest:- _ x Rezoning ___ Approval of Prelirn-inary Plat ___ Spocial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat _:L_ Variance :__ Other ------------------- Description of Request. _ To construct addition to ctnir�hJs�s Ly_____ owned church'prop� with addition exrenri;-)ry into ro r to be ac red at 218 West Pine Street. ..---------------�---� LY-------------------- -- ------.----_--------- --- ---.-----_---------- r __ _.--- Signature of Applicant: ----- -�'=�7�••,_ Date or Public Hearing: --------------------------------------------- NO ': Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this fora or at- tacred, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street namnes. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved -__ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ----------- (date) subjec; to the following conditions:---_-------------m_---____-_-------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to t! e following conditions: ------------------------------------------------ Comments: (Use other side), SAINT MARY'S CHURCH — STILLWATER, MINNESOTA Proposed "Fari.sh Center" Addition and iandicapped/Accessibility Project Summary ° Proposed construction of grade level 2880 square feet "multipurpose room", along with connecting hallways, entries, kitchen and storage areas. To be located on current church property and a 75' by 150' parcel at the northeast corner of Fifth and Pine Streets that the church intends to purchase. ° New enclosed stairwell -- from second floor to basement of Religious Education Center (replaces external open air fire escape) for enhanced safety and easier entrance and egress. ° Elevator to provide access for handicapped and elderly from ground level of connecting hallway to first and second floors of Religious Education Center - makes all facilities totally accessible. ° New toilet areas -- completely handicapped accessible and equipped. Arch.itecturaltDesi n Constructed of brick and stone to match existing, including design detailing. ° To look as if it were original -- same architect, same concepts as used in 1989-90 Rivertown Restoration award winning church restoration project. Retains 100+ year old maple tree at Fifth and Pine -- park -like p1cLLd/Wd11ZWc1yS Q11U 1c111LLSl.GpCU Cllcd3 at C.Oriler, ai3v ur%:Fi ua.twccai i.aaulcaa and Religious Education Center will be a landscaped park. Purpose ° To provide for safety and accessibility to existing Religious Education Center -- elevator, enclosed stairwell, new toilets. To provide a social/recreation area for the parish that is accessible to all -- with the St. Croix Valley Catholic Religious Education program using existing school building full-time, the addition will accommodate wedding receptions, funeral luncheons, recreation activities, etc., that are presently restricted due to unavailability or inaccessibility. Traffic Flow/Parkin ° Traffic congestion reduced by "one-way" travel entering north of church, exiting on Pine Street (possible "right turn only"). ° Parking for handicapped with easy access to buildings provided along east property line. • Allows convenient, sheltered "drop-off" for elderly and handicapped passengers. • Pine Street exit to be landscaped and coordinated with adjacent property owner. Set Sacks Zonin ° The property at the northeast corner of Fifth and Pine Streets is presently zoned "residential" and contains a duplex. • Church intends to acquire property and remove existing house and garage. ° Pine Street and Fifth Street setbacks will generally coincide with that of present house, except that it appears that the south wall of the addition will extend approximately one foot beyond the existing house (waiting for survey report). ° Fifth Street setback will be considerably more than existing garage which will be removed from site -- west side to be plaza/walkways area. LiQhtin� • Additional lighting will be minimal. Wall mount and pole fixtures will be added to the west side of the addition -- both between the church/school area and at Fifth and Pine Streets -- all to match existing. ° Lighting only to extent necessary for safety will be added to.the rear of the complex and impact on neighboring residences will be minimally incremental in relation to existing exterior lighting. Conclusion ° Addition and accessibility enhancements, along with removal of existing house and garage at Fifth and Pine Streets, will improve the area and provide needed space and accessibility. ° There will not be any significant increase in traffic or usage at any one time; funerals are now held in the church -- luncheons will extend the time; weddings are now held in the church -- the addition will allow receptions there; currently parish activities are held at the Religious Education Center, the addition provides for convenience, accessibility and safety. The addition and accessibility enhancements are a continuation of the Renovation and Renewal Project which began in 1989 whereby a full city block of historical "old" Stillwater will have been maintained, renovated and enhanced for many years into the future. Conclusion — continued ° The three existing Saint Mary's buildings -- each over 100 years old -- will have all been externally renovated with emphasis on architectural integrity and construction -- the "look" will be maintained. ° Adjacent property owners have been informed of the project and no opposition has been expressed.