Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-13 CPC Packetwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA May 8, 1991 THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, MAY 13, 1991 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NORTH FOURTH STRECT. AGENDA Approval of Minutes - April 8, 1991. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Case No. SUB/91-17 - A minor subdivision of a 11.29 acre parcel into two lots of 4.96 acres and 6.33 acres. The site is located north of State Trunk Highway 96 in the RA, Single Family Residential District and Bluffland/ Shoreland District. Kenneth Seefert, Applicant. 2. Case No. SUP/91-19 - A modification to a previously approved Special Use Permit. The request is to construct a 22 foot x 24 foot two story addition to a group home residential facility at 310 West Myrtle Street in the RCM, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential District. Rodney Stivland, Applicant. 3. Case No. V /91-21 - A Variance to the five foot sideyard setback requirement for the construction of an attached garage with a zero sideyard setback. The property is located at 915 W. Abbott Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Raymond Loida, Applicant. 4. Case No. V/91-22 - A Variance to the frontyard setback requirement (thirty feet required, fifteen feet requested) and to the sideyard setback requirement (five feet required, three feet requested) for the construction of a screened -porch at 511 West Moore Street. The property is located in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Jeff Sherburne, Applicant. 5. Case No. V/91-24 - A Variance to the building coverage for an accessory structure (1,000 square feet maximum, 1,562 square feet requested) for the construction of an 832 square foot garage at 428 East Alder Street. The property is located in the RB, Two Family Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland District. Douglas Vollmer, Applicant. 6. Case No. SUB/91-25 - A major subdivision of a 29.5 acre parcel into two outlots and five developable lots ranging in size from 25,180 square feet to 44,600 square feet (Green Twig Way). The site is located off Eagle Ridge Trail in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Tim Nolde; Applicant. 7. Case No. SUB/91-26 - A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of a twenty square foot monument sign, eight feet from the property line, at 1672 South Greeley Street in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Larry Axdahl and Sheldon Pearson, Applicants. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 Planning Agenda May 13, 1991 Page Two 8. Case No. SUP/91-27 - A Special Use Permit for a guest house inn with three rooms and indoor/outdoor public dining. The site is located at 114 East Chestnut Street (the Brunswick House) in the CBD, Central Business District. Duane and Martha Hubbs, Applicants. 9. Case No. V/91-28 - (five feet rearyard requested) for the Third Street in the Applicant. OTHER BUSINESS: A Variance to the rear and sideyard setback requirements and sideyard required, two feet rearyard and sideyard construction of a 442 square foot garage at 808 South RB, Two Family Residential District. Daniel St. Claire, 10. Case No. SUP/90-17 - One Year Review of a Special Use Permit to conduct small group tours, small business meetings and small weddings (forty people capacity) at the William Sauntry Bed and Breakfast. The property is located at 626 north Fourth Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Duane and Martha Hubbs, Permit Holders. 11. Case No. ZAT/91 - Review and discussion of the reorganization and reclarification and minor modifications to the Zoning Ordinance, City Code, Chapter 31. STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Date: April 8, 1991 Time: 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman Angela Anderson, Glenna Bealka, Gary Funke, Rob Hamlin, Warren Pakulski, and Don Valsvik Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director Members Absent: Judy Curtis, Duane Elliott Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Warren Pakulski to approve the minutes of the meeting of March 11, 1991 as submitted. Seconded by Glenna Bealka. Motion carried 7-0. PUBLIC_ HEARINGS Case No. V/SUB/91-8 - Variance to the lot size requirements for a minor subdivision of a 3,528 square foot parcel into two parcels of 896 square feet and 2,688 square feet at 208 South Main St. Arlen Rivard, owner of the property, presented the request. This case is continued from lastmonth's meeting, at which time the Commission viewed a video of the property. The parcel contains three separate buildings, built at separate times, which house five retail outlets. Mr. Rivard stated that he has received an offer on the building which was formerly Estelle's. He has located a party wall agreement dating from 1867. There is a recommended condition of approval requiring separate water and sewer be installed at 208 South Main. Mr. Rivard stated he has obtained bids for the installation. Motion by Angela Anderson to approve the Variance and Subdivision request with one condition. Seconded by Warren Pakulski. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. sI!PL91-13 - A Special Use Permit for the placement of a twenty four by fourteen foot CT scanner modular unit on the west side of Lakeview Memorial Hospital (emergency entrance), at 919 West Anderson Street. Cory Kissling, Administrative Director of Professional Services, presented the application. He explained that he is in charge of all outpatient care, including X-Ray. He stated that the request is for a temporary scanner, as the Hospital administration is looking at different options for expansion in the future. They do not want to add on to the hospital at this time before definite 1 Stillwater Planning Commission April 8, 1991 plans are made for expansion, but the Hospital is short of space. The modular unit will be a plywood structure, located up against the garage on a foundation. Mr. Kissling stated that this unit will be the first and only of its kind in the upper midwest. At the present time a scanner truck comes to the hospital four days per week. That truck would be eliminated once the modular unit is built. Mr. Hamlin asked if there would be any problem with radiation emissions from the unit. Mr. Kissling responded that the walls will be lined with lead, and there will be no radiation outside the unit. Charles Hooley, 920 South Greeley, stated that he sees no problem with the structure, but feels that the hospital should have a comprehensive plan. Howard Lieberman, 914 South Greeley, asked when the parking lot will be landscaped. Mr. Kissling responded that he is not sure at this time, but he will find out and contact Mr. Lieberman to let him know. Mr. Kissling also stated that the exterior of the unit will be painted to match the exterior bricks on the hospital to help it blend in. It was suggested that this be required as a condition of approval. Motion by Gary Funke to approve the Special Use Permit request with one condition. Seconded by Don Valsvik. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. V 91-14 - A Variance to the frontyard setback require- ments (thirty feet required, twenty six feet proposed) for the construction of a garage/living space addition and a Variance to lot coverage for all accessory structures (1,000 square feet required, 1,183 requested), at 1019 North Second Street. Joe Samuelson III, owner of the property, presented the application. He stated that the greenhouse addition will probably not be an L-shape as indicated on the plans, because of cost factors. Mr. Samuelson was asked what his intentions are for the old garage. He stated that he is an artist, and uses that building as a studio in which to paint and store paintings. Mr. Russell explained that a Variance is needed for lot coverage of accessory structures and also size of storage structures (120 square feet allowed, 783 square feet requested) since the existing garage is to remain. Mr. Russell also stated that there is a question as to where the front property line is. The setback requirement is from the front property line, not the street. Laura Shely, 810 N. Everett, stated that the house is nice now, and this improvement will make it even better. Stillwater Planning Commission April 8, 1991 There is one recommended condition of approval. The Commission added a second condition: The old rear garage shall be used only as storage or shop space and not living space and no sewer shall be installed. Motion by Don Valsvik to approve the Variance request with two conditions. Seconded by Gary Funke. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. DR SUP 91-15 - A Special Use Permit for a miniature golf course at 204 N. Main St., in the CBD, Central Business District. Todd and Laura Shely, proposed owners, presented the application. Mr. Shely stated they are in the process of purchasing the property. There will also be a retail store. Mr. Russell stated that the plan was presented to the Design Review Committee this afternoon. The Committee approved the plan, but said the use was Inconsistent with downtown. Rick Schneider, business owner to the south of the property, stated that he would like to see them have a chance at this business. He also stated that the miniature golf course would not be noticeable from Main Street, and that the property would be cleaned up. Vern Steffan, business owner at 212 North Main St., asked if there would be a problem with contaminated soil under the property. Mrs. Shely stated that the gas tanks will be removed and the soil checked. An environmental fund will pay for all but 10 percent of the clean-up. Mr. Steffan stated that he believes that in the long-term, this would not be an acceptable use. He suggested that if approval is given, there be some limitation so that the City Council will review the Special Use Permit in a number of years. Jay Michaels, 118 1/2 No. Main, stated that he believes anything would be better than what exists at the location now, but he is concerned that it would set a precedent for the north end of Main Street. Mr. Hamlin stated that the golf course would have to be very low profile. Mrs. Shely stated that there will be no plastic and no bright colors used. There will be a two -foot wide, dark red brick planter with perennials used as a screen. The Shelys felt a five- year reviewal clause would be reasonable. Mr. Valsvik stated that he feels this would be a move to a Wisconsin Dells -type of atmosphere downtown. Glenna Bealka stated that the golf course would not be noticeable, and that approval will likely not lead to requests for a water slide downtown. Mr. Hamlin suggested a three-year sunset clause be written if approval is given. Mr. Shely stated that this is a way to beautify the property and Stillwater Planning Commission April 8, 1991 to have something downtown for families to do, and to add variety to the downtown area. Warren Pakulski stated that people come downtown for the business and shopping atmosphere and a recreational use would detract from that. Mr. Valsvik also stated he does not believe the use is appropriate for downtown. Mr. Hamlin stated that he does not have enough information to make a decision. Motion by Rob Hamlin to table the proposal and request more information such as elevations and more detail regarding the miniature golf course. Seconded by Glenna Bealka. There was further discussion before the vote was taken. The Commission was concerned that the Shelys will have to wait another month before a decision is made. Mr. Shely stated he would be willing to wait another month if there is any chance for approval. The vote was taken and was a tie vote. In favor: R. Hamlin, G. Bealka, A. Anderson; opposed: G. Fontaine, D. Valsvik, W. Pakulski. G. Funke abstained. Discussion continued regarding the appropriateness of the use and whether the applicant should be made to wait another month. Mr. Funke stated he would be willing to vote for denial of the request. Motion by Warren Pakulski to deny approval of the Special Use Permit. Don Valsvik seconded. Rob Hamlin objected on the grounds that the original vote was tampered with, and the 3-3 vote should stand. Don Valsvik withdrew his second and agreed with the 3-3 vote. Mr. Russell and the applicant will work with a design professional to develop a plan, and the case will be heard again next month. - - Review of Special Use Permit and report on 1990 Rivertown Trolley activities. Bob Raleigh, owner of the Trolley, was present, and reviewed the original conditions of approval. Cond. No. 1: The setback is currently under five feet, but the booth will be moving around this summer because of construction. Cond. No. 3 is eliminated. Cond. No. 4: October 15, 1991 was changed to November 15, 1991. Cond. No. 5: Mr. Raleigh requested eight square feet for the sign. Motion by Warren Pakulski to recommend approvel of the Special Use Permit Review, with changes in the original conditions as requested. Seconded by Rob Hamlin. Motion carried 7-0. Stillwater Planning Commission April 8, 1991 Report on Governmgnt Training Service Workshop on Planning and Zoning - Glenna Bealka stated that she learned at the workshop that abstention from a vote should be made only for financial reasons, and that the person abstaining should do so at the beginning and then leave the room. Angela Anderson stated that many cities are now adopting adult entertainment ordinances. Warren Pakulski stated that he learned that planning decisions affect the next seven generations. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Gary Funke to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Seconded by Rob Hamlin. Motion carried. Submitted by: Shelly Schaubach Recording Secretary 5 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUB/91-17 Planning Commission meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: Just west of Highway 95/96 intersection. Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Zoning District: RA Single Family Residential Applicant's Name: Kenneth Seefert Type of Application: Subdivision of two lots. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request to subdivi re a 11.29 acre parcel into two lots of 4.96 and 6.33 acres. DISCUSSION: The request is to subdivide a 11.29 acre lot into two lots of 4.96 acres (Parcel A) and 6.33 acres (Parcel B). The 11.29 acre site is located in the Single Family Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland Overlay District. No sewer and water service is available to the site. The character of the area is large lot single family development. The Bluffland/Shoreland District requires a 1.0 acre lot minimum with a 150 foot minimum lot width and 100 foot lot depth. The site, located approximately 1/2 mile from the river, is not visible from the river. Access to the site is provided off of State Highway 96 by two rough cut driveways. Both parcels have irregular topography with a stream running between them. Soil surveys were preformed for the two sites for a potential building location. Final septic system designs will have to be designed and approved before building permits can be issued. Because of the steep slopes it is recommended that the building plans for the two parcels be reviewed and approved before building permits are issued. The building plans, including driveways, shall show how the increased runoff from the development is handled minimizing the potential for erosion during and after construction. Because the subdivision is located in the Bluffland/Shoreland District, the subdivision request has been referred to the Minnesota/Wisconsin Boundary Area Commission and MN Dept. of Natural Resources for comment. No comments have been received from the DNR and MWBAC comments are attached. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions. FINDINGS: The request as proposed and conditioned is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, including Bluffland/Shoreland regulations. CASE NO. SUB/91-17 - Continued. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The building plans for construction on the lots shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director before building permits are issued for the construction of single family residences. The plans shall show any tree removal, grading, drainage and erosion control measures, and on -site septic system plans consistent with PCA requirements. 2. For recording, new lots A and B shall not be further subdivided without City sewer service. 3. This subdivision is not approved until it is certified by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. ATTACHMENTS: Application 7p 7p cation - Subdivision Plan. 1•A.: IUU Case Number Y 41 J�:�4 Fee Paid --------- CASE NUMBER Date Filed _ `-:. ------ PLANNING ADMINIS T IRA ` 6VS FORM Street Location of Property. ____Dellwood-Road-North & St _ Croix Tr_ N logal Description of Property: Pt__ of I_otl�_ Sec ._21�_ Tw�_#TO Rye : ##20 Owner: Name _ Kenneth Seefert-_ __-____--------------------- Address _Ns.: -------- Phone: _ � _:714J_____ Applicant (if other than owner): Name __---_____-----------------...__-__ Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------- Type of Request: ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat ___ Spocial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance ___ Other -__-__----_-_-___-- Description of Request: _S�lit_an 11,,.2,E acre lot into 2 parcels______ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Signature of Applicant:.����..r�� Date of Public Hearing: ----------------------..__-._-______---_-_-_.._- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. - 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. G :• . „ 7. Other information as may be requested. 31 el �. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ------ dute) subject to the following conditions: --___-_--.-_------------------------- Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the I sollowing conditions• ------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments. (Use other side), 1 waater THEnow BIRTH PLACE OF MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND PERMIT REVIEW AGENCIES FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 24, 1991 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 11.29 ACRE LOT INTO TWO LOTS OF 4.96 ACRES AND 6.33 ACRES LOCATED IN THE SINGLE FAMILY (RA) BLUFFLAND/SHORELAND (BS) DISTRICT. KENNETH SEEFERT, APPLICANT. CASE NO.- SUB/91-17) The City of Stillwater has received a request to subdivide a 11.29 acre site into two lots. (See location map.) The site is located in the Bluffland/Shoreland District and requires submittal to Review Agencies for comment. The item has been scheduled for hearing by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1991 and the City Council of the City of Stillwater on June 4, 1991. Please submit any comments you may have so they may be considered by the City in their decision on the request. ATTACHMENT: - Location Map - Certificate of Survey - May 3, 1989. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 ;;0011�1 5�h/q A2 gT0.� cpwn'S Co CK CORPORA�ELr5 14T E R a a CGUNTRY C L U B H-" MINNESOTA-WISCONSIN BOUNDARY AREA COMMISSION R 619 SECOND STREET, HUDSON, WISCONSIN 54016-1576 Serving Our Sponsor States on the St. Croix iinnesota Telephone and Mississippi Rivers since 1965 Wisconsin Telephone (612) 436-7131 (715) 386-9444 Office Hours: 8 A M. - 5 P.M Monday -Friday May 2, 1991 Steve Russell Community Development Director City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 RE: Subdivision Request -- Kenneth Seefert Case No. SUB/91-17 Dear Mr. Russell: In response to your letter of April 24, 1991 regarding the request by Kenneth Seefert to subdivide 11.29 acres lot into two lots (Parcel A: 4.96 acres and Parcel B 6.33 acres) we have the following comments: 1. We defer to the Minnesota DNR for regulatory comments on this request. 2. We have no objections if the Riverway ordinance of the City of Stillwater and the Minnesota DNR minimum standards can be met. 3. We are particularly concerned that the lots that would be created have sufficient space and dimensional and topographic features that would enable any future construction without the need for any variances from Riverway zoning regulations. We cannot support the creation of any lots that would later result in a request for a variance request by a subsequent builder in order to make reasonable use of the property. A hardship condition should not be created when it can be prevented in the process of establishing lot dimensions and configuration. Please enter these comments into the hearing record. We will not be present at the hearing. Please advise us, as well, of the final decision of the planning commission and council. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, >anMc �'e s Associate Executive Director cc: Molly Shodeen, MDNR PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUP/91-19 Project Location: 310 West Myrtle Street Comprehensive Plan District: Medium Density Multiple Family Residential. Zoning District: RCM Applicant's Name: Rodney Stivland & Dianne Addison Type of Application: Special Use Permit PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A modification to a previously approved Special Use Permit. The request is to construct a 22 foot x 24 foot two story addition to a group home residential facility. DISCUSSION: The request is to construct a 22 foot x 24 foot two story addition to a group home residential facility. This addition will add additional living areas to the facility but will not increase the number of residents. Presently, the structure is licensed for sixteen persons. The two story addition will add approximately 1,056 square feet of living space to the facility which will include meeting/living room areas. It does not include private sleeping rooms. The site plan shows where the addition will be located on the site. It meets the setbacks for the zoning district. According to the site plan, the addition will not take out parking spaces. There is 34 feet from the addition to the driveway. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: As previously conditioned. (See Conditional Use Permit issued May 20, 1986.) RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: TEie proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public. ATTACHMENTS: - Site Plan. - Application Form. - Conditions. PAC 100 CASE NUMBER Case Numb 11` � Fee Paid Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: __ 31UjJ, art] e StreetStillwater= [Hd 5508 2 logal Description of Property: See Attached ---------------------------------- Owner: Name __ ;Qc_IILey L _ stivland _ D ague H. Addison ------------ Address _�'���c) 1:nr,�,1 e bane, PI, Grove_ P�d Phone:---420-3643 ------------ Applicant (if other than owner): Name _-__-_--_--____----__-_.,______-___ Address ------------------------------ Phone: _______-___---- Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat _X_ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat ___ Variance ___ Other _________________ Description of Request. _Ue currently have a Special 'Use Perr�oit under the name of lia-rbor Shelter fx Couriseling Ctr./Stivland, Ilic. allowing us to house 16 adolescents in the bldp,. We seek to add a 22x24 addition onto the bldg. to be used for a�Z t oL I���ui are3�ceePii��; tTze �ota7 aceu�a — a— YG'�--- --- Signature of Applicant. _ __ _ Date of Public Hearing: ---__-__-_____..___. ---___-_____ _____________ NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. ?. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ----------- (dute) subject to the following conditions: ____________________ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------------------------ Comments: (Use other side), 3 i o i�t r y 4E fi -7v ti f { , 11 T � s L 75' ' J �L 1 I � I r , CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City of Stillwater, Minnesota PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: RODNEY L. STIVLAND, ACSW Date Issued: May 20, 1986 310 West Myrtle Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 ZONING DISTRICT: RCM Medium Density Family It appearing to the City Council of the City of Stillwater, that the Rodney Stivland Group Home Residential Facility located at 310 West Myrtle Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082, is both an institutional use and a boarding house and that such a use requires a Conditional Use Permit in the RCM Zoning District; and that since the residential facility is within 1,320 feet of an existing residential facility and as such the State of Minnesota, prior to the licensing of the home requires that a Conditional Use Permit be granted by the city in which it is located and that the City of Stillwater and the State of Minnesota are anxious to avoid the excess concentration of residential facilities within any city, so the City Council, therefore, by this permit imposes the following conditions which it deems necessary to protect the health and safety of the residents of the facility and also, because of the concentration of the facilities within a particular district, the City Council hereby imposes certain conditions for the protection of the neighborhood: 1. This Conditional Use Permit shall be effective only so long as the facility is a duly licensed residential facility within the meaning of Rule 8 of the Rules of Minnesota Department of Public Welfare. 2. This Conditional Use Permit shall be effective only as long as the residential facility serves and is licensed for 16 persons or less. 3. The facility must comply with all conditions imposed upon its operation by the Department of Public Welfare of the State of Minnesota. 4. That the facility must submit to the City Council any application a that it makes to the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare for a change in the status of its license. This shall be submitted to the City Council at the same time that the application is made to the Department of Public Welfare. 5. No identification, advertising or other signs shall be permitted except those specifically authorized by the City Council or permitted under the provisions of the Stillwater City Zoning Ordinance. That all reasonable measures should be taken to prevent residents from this facility from trespassing upon or through adjacent private property and the privately owned ravines that are adjacent to the facility. 6. This Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed and amended at any time after notice and public hearing to impose such further restrictions as may be necessary to protect the health and safety of the residents of the facility and the health and safety of the residents of the City of Stillwater. Passed by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 20th day of May, 1986. Harr/D. Peterson, Mayor Mary Lou bohnson, City 0 erk PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW_ CASE NO. V/91-21 Planning Commission Meeting: May, 13, 1991 Project Location: 915 West Abbott Street Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential Zoning District: RB Applicant's Name: Raymond and Bonnie Loida Type of Application: Variance. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Variance to tiie five foot sideyard setback requirement for the construction of a garage with a zero sideyard setback. DISCUSSION: The request is to construct an attached garage to an older home. The lot abutts Washington Park to the north where the attached garage will be located as shown on the attached site plan. There is an existing driveway on this side of the home. The twenty four foot area is large enough to accommodate the garage and is a reasonable area on the site for the placement of the garage. The applicants have not indicated how large their existing shed is and if they will continue to use the structure. The parcel is 16,500 square feet which is over two small City lots. There are also no adjacent structures abutting the property. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. Al drainage from the roof shall remain on site and not impact Washington Park. 2. A one hour fire rating shall be installed as per Building Inspector's coi,nments on the building permit. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: iiie granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. ATTACHMENTS: - App cation Form - Site Plan - Short Letter. kc 100 Case Number L01__ a f G° Fee Paid ____------ -� Dave Filed __/.)'� PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Straat Inr.ntion of Property: _ 15 _ a__4LLdTL 2L. Legal Doscription of Property: ------ Owner: NameGLon__L�C/1_ULC�CC_ ___--_— Address ------ Phone:=_ Applicant (if other than owner): Name ________ ------------------------- Address ------------------------------ Phone: __ Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary PIat ___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat ,- Variance ___ Other _-__________..-_-_-_ Description of Request: U � Signature of Applicant:�tz2�u___ Date of Public Nearing: ---------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn �n back .of"t:iis. corm or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. , 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. rrl7 t 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs., ? I 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street narnes.._, 6. Location of adjacent etisting buildings.` 7. Other information as may be requested.�j — Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ___________ (date) subiect to the following conditions: ____________________________________ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on _________.__._____ subject to tii Le followingconditions: __________________ ____--__--_______----__-_------------------------------------------------------------------ - Comments: (Use other side) --ILA ol� N e k-tu coo 75. fb lea f f r y f. l 1 I 4 Rouse. Clara _ PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/91-22 Planning Commission Meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: 511 West Moore Street Comprehensive Plan District: Residential Zoning District: RB - Duplex Residential Applicant's Name: Jeff Sherburne Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Variance to the front and sideyard setback requirement for construction of a 14 ft. x 10 ft. porch. DISCUSSION fF�e request is to construct a 10 ft. x 14 ft. porch addition to the front of an existing single family residence. Residences to the east and west of the house are setback 25 to 30 feet. The Sherburne lot is retained in the front by a concrete wall. The addition would be above the wall. The Stillwater County Club is located across the street. The addition would project out closer to the street then the houses on either side. A hedge and tree partially screen the addition from the neighbor to the west. The required front setback is thirty feet. The proposed setback is fifteen feet. The proposed side setback is three feet, the required is five feet. RECOMMENDATION: Denial. ATTACHMENTS: --Application - Plans. 100 Case Number Fee Paid L� ___-- � c Dale Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: Legal Description of Property:°TS-__ff,;2-gF-fko'r10 Wr_r-/NS AP2) 3R4 "J'4ki Owner: Name __ Vry �-_--------------_ Address __ //__L `_ �1fG+o _S :L��✓�%Phone: __ '4139_ P__ Applicant (if other than owner): dame _----_---------.-----.----- ---- Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------- Type of Request:, ___ Rezoning ___ Approval'of Preliminary Plat SUecial Usa Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat XVariance ___ 01 her ------------ . -_ oiJ7' Pop e r9J�lT/o�/ VfF e- Description of Request: -----------------------------------------� -N --- � ° --- ! -p on1 7' __ f"T - �`-'`�'----------------- ~y--_-_- Si nature of Applicant': g P, -- Date of Public Nearing: __--____--_- --------------------------------- NOTD: Snetch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back oz t1`ii.s form or at- tzcned, showing the following: 1. North direction. t . 2. Location of proposed structure on lot_ 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. _ 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. Ri 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent etiisting buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved _-_ Dcnied -__ by the'Planning Commission on (date) subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------------- ----- Approved -__ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the following condilions------------------------------------------------- Comments: (Use other side) VARIANCE: (a) There are special circumstances or conditions, fully described in the findings, applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings. (b) For reasons set forth fully in the findings, the granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or buildings and that the same is the minimum variance that will accomplish such purpose. (c) The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherise detrimental to the public welfare. In addition to considering the character and use of adjoining land and buildings and those in the vicinity, in making such finding, the City Council shall take into account the number of persons residing or working in such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the area among other considerations. PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/91-24 Planning Commission Meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: 428 East Alder Street Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential and Bluffland/Shoreland District. Zoning District: RB Applicant's Name: Douglas Vollmer Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Variance to the building coverage for all accessory structures (1,000 square feet maximum, 1,562 square feet requested) for the construction of an 832 square foot garage. DISCUSSION: The request is to build a new 832 square foot garage on a lot which presently has a 730 square foot attached garage. The garage on the property will be torn down along with an existing shed on the site. Tile applicant has stated this new garage will provide storage and a maintenance area for his vehicles. The location of this property is behind Wolf Marina in the Bluffland/Shoreland District. The property gently slopes up from the parking area of the Marina. The slope is not greater than 12% so the location of the garage cannot be defined as in the bluffline. The shoreline is over 100 feet from the location of the proposed garage. The Marina screens the property from the river so the garage will not be visually conspicuous from the riverway. Also, demolition of the shed and existing garage will clean up the site. There will be one less structure on this parcel after construction of the new garage. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The garage shall be blue to match the home and the Marina environment. 2. No additional structures shall be constructed on the site. 3. Comments from the review agencies on the St. Croix Riverway shall be considered for the project. 4. The existing shed shall be torn down before the garage is used. 5. No non-residential commercial activity shall take place on tine site. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: The granting of this variance will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and Bluffland/Shoreland Ordinance. The character and use of adjoining land and buildings will not be impacted. ATTACHMENTS: - Application Form. - Site Plan. PAC 100 Caso Number A _2 09 Feo Paid ------ CASE NUMBER Date Piled — 2�4_4L.____ PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: "I ----------- Locgal Doscription of Property:----A'0_ ----------------------------- Owner: Name --.-------------------------- Address Phone: Applicant (if other than owner): Name -_-___..____---_--- _-__----__-- Address _------------------------ Phone: --------------- Typo of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Variance :__ Other ___________________ Description of Request: 632- 5- Signature of Applicant. Date of of Public Hearing: _--------.._-_---_--..._________________________ NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. Alr� 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. ,.C�r Rik 1 c. 5. Street names. s 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.``!. , 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on --------- Cdate) subject to the following conditions: ____________________________________ Approved -__ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the followingconditions: ------------------------------------------------ Comments. (Use other side), �a v rn 0 LA 3 R 4 i I ! 51 i 1 ! G" -0 j �yo I I r_M m I PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUB/91-25 Planning Commission Meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: Off of Eagle Ridge Trail next to McKusick Lake. Comprehensive Plan District: Residential Zoning District: RA, Single Family Residential, FP Flood Plain Applicant's Name: Tim Nolde, ANCHOAYPRO, Inc. Type of Application: Subdivision - Five Lots. PLANNING REVIEW Request to sub -divide 29.5 acre lot into five parcels. DISCUSSION: Tile request is to subdivide the 29.5 acre parcel into five lots of areas indicated below. Lot 1 - 19,625 square feet above the 100 year flood plain elevation (FPE). Lot 2 - 14,380 square feet FPE, Lot 3 - 18,210 square feet FPE, Lot 4 - 24,369 Square feet FPE. Lot 5 - 35,690 square feet FPE. Total area: 112,265 square feet. The lands below the regulated flood elevation do not count toward the developable land area requirement for subdivisions. The 100 year flood elevation is indicated on the preliminary plat along with general site topography. A grading plan or utility plan has not been submitted for review but will have to be prepared and approved before final plat approval. Much of the parcel is within the McKusick Lake wetland. This area should be preserved in its natural condition by controlling grading and vegetation cutting. The site is zoned RA, Single Family Residential. The minimum lot area requested is 10,000 square feet with lot width of 75 feet and lot depth of 100 feet. The proposed subdivision meets the zoning lot area and dimensional requirements. The City's park dedication policy requires that for this size project, 8% of the land area be dedicated for parks. 8% of the developable area equals 9,000 square feet. The Park Board has previously indicated they would like to provide a pathway along the old street car line (Outlot A) around McKusick Lake to the north. This subdivision proposal will be brought to the Park Board for their review of the parks dedication before final platting. The proposal has been reviewed by the City Engineer who indicated in his letter of review (attached) that detailed, grading, erosion control and utility plans must be submitted to complete review of the site but that utiltie4s are available in the area. FINDINGS: The single gle family subdivision as proposed and conditioned is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Flood Plain regulations and Subdivision Requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 A grading plan indicating building envelopes and the lowest habitable flood elevation for each lot shall be submitted before final final plat approval. 2. A pathway as finally determined by the Park Board shall be dedicated for such use to the City before final plat approval. 3. A street construction and utility plan shall be approved and constructed before final plat approval. 4. All building envelopes shall be setback a minimum of 25 feet for the flood plain level. 5. A grading permit, including erosion control provisions, shall be obtained before any construction begins. 6. The vegetative area below the rear setback shall not be disturbed. 7. A deed restriction shall be placed on the lot, maintaining the natural character of the Flood Plain and setback area adjacent to McKusick Lake. ATTACHMENTS: - Application - Preliminary Plat. Case Number Fee Paid CASE NUMBER Date Filed _ _ ��ZL______ PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORr1t`a Street Location of Pro ert 0_1-_�_ --d�__� F�� �f L Logal Description of Property: .r�! Owner: Name - _-------------------, ------- Address _3 0-__' - -Pft _-- __ ✓7 --------- Phone. __JZ/_L_ 7 App icant (if other than owner): Name _________________________________ Address------------------------------ Phone: ----------------- Type of Request: ___ Rezoning _2(_- Approval -of Preliminary Plat ___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat ___ Variance : Other ___________________ Description of Request: _2Llain1 y�v,_��� _ .. _arv- �/C�v TLoT- opt/ r-----------------------' _----_-----------------_--------------- - --- -- 7- -- nature of A nlicrr, _. g p, �___ _-_ _-__-_ �� Data of Public Hearing: --____----__________________________..______ NOTE. Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn -on back of this fora, or at- tached, snowing the following: 1. North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ----------- (date) subject to the following conditions: ---___-_- -__________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the following conditions: ------______________________________________ __ Comments: (Use other side), .AV Aow ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS r PLANNERS May 8, 1991 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000 RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA PLANNING CASE REVIEW GREEN TWIG WAY SUB NO. 9125 SEH FILE NO. 89114 Mr. Steve Russell Community Development Coordinator City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Russell: We have reviewed the preliminary plan for Green Twig Way as requested in your memorandum dated May 3, 1991. There is a trunk sanitary sewer which crosses their proposed cul- de-sac roadway which may be used for sanitary sewer service. This will require excavating to the existing pipe and constructing a manhole over the pipe. There is sufficient depth to serve the lots in the preliminary plat, providing a grading as not substantially lowered from the existing contours. There is a 12" watermain inplace in Eagle Ridge Trail. It will require excavating in Eagle Ridge Trail and replacing the surfacing and base construction in kind. City requirements are for the developer to submit a preliminary plan for utilities and site grading for approval. by the City. We cannot address erosion control and erosion control costs at this time until a preliminary site grading plan is received. It appears that the property can be served by public utilities and roadway access, as stated above. It appears there are no unusual conditions for this development. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 490-2016. Sincerely, Richard E. Moore, P.E. City Engineer REM/wrc SHORT ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN OVERALL DESCRIPTION - GREEN TWIG WAY EXHIBIT A (9029-3000) 27.56 acres part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 29, Township 30, Range 20 beginning on the East line thereof 13.26 chains South of Northeast Corner thence North 75 degrees, 30 minutes West 5.54 chains; thence North 20 degrees, 30 minutes West 11.58 chains to a point in North line 7.78 chains West of Northeast corner; thence West to Northwest corner; thence South to the Southwest corner; thence East to Southeast corner; thence North to beginning except 1.67 acres for right of way Interurban Railroad except part South of Suburban Railroad Highway easement. (9029-3050) Part of the Northwest :1uarter of the Northeast Quarter Section 29, Township 30, Range 20 being a 100 foot strip of abandoned right of way except South 25 feet. Subject to an easement. (9029-3200) .61 acres of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter Section 29, Township 30, Range 20 being that part of the East 70 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest kuarter of said Section 29 lying Northerly of i•?inneapolis and St. Paul Suburban Railroad and lying Southerly of a line drawn Westerly at right angle to East line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter from a point on said East line a distance of 760.02 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter together with an easement for ingress and egress and together with right to install sewer and water lines over and across East 70.52 feet of abandoned street car right of way formerly owned by St. Paul Suburban Railroad located immediately South of above described real estate in Northeast Quarter of+the Northwest Quarter of said Section 29. �� 4� Idomw ef I ENGINEERS+ ARCHITECTSJI PLANNERS December 5, 1988 222EAWLI(ILECANA011P0,10,Sri-: A41NNE,0IA55117 12 484-0:17z 4 J/i-.'ODD RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA CITY ENGINEER SEH FILE NO: 87007 Mr. Mark J. Vierling Edberg,_ Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling Law Offices 1835 Northwestern Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Vierling: As you requested, we are enclosing the "as constructed" information for sanitary sewer adjacent to the Granquist property. The sanitary sewer at manhole #150 indicated on the "as constructed" drawing, is approximately 20 to 22 feet deep. As I stated on the telephone, this is more than sufficient for depth for single family or multiple housing. We have also transposed the proposed cul-de-sac from the Certificate of Survey you sent this office on the "as constructed" drawing for your convenience. In addition, we have transposed the cul-de-sac and existing sanitary sewer on a topography map which is dated July 7, 1979. This topography map was taken from aerial contours dated April, 1976. This map was prepared by Bruce A. Folz & Associates as a part of the original Oak Glen Development proposal. The contour interval is 2 feet. We have outlined in red the even 10 foot contours on Mr. Granquist's site. This will give you an indication of the grading required.to develop the site. If there is any further information you desire, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Richard E. Moore REM/cih Enclosures cc: Steve Russell, City Planner, City of Stillwater SI LWI ELLIOTT I U_ NL7PICKSON INGJ 19 8 8 SI I�AUI, E;1,1 r-AI.L_;, (V 00 00 Jul O LIl �Y cn +- CD O M cB a; ul LLJ LL C I =D L__. Y— -I- cD ALL- L.CV Q) r- •+LLD JO-a Z 3 Y U O — — CD Or) Cf) a-- O M Q 'o 0 ++` i�d• Z � � �• fJ'�� :V N //J Z Z W O W Q: N Z U a J Un a- ♦4-- O W +-- a a- 2 +� t•5� �dJ 4 1, \� rLr A Ar�A aj 07 7, e Are 1 �/ r 0 V 2 75 J Oe.7viwe,- 6v 710 No. az-zo/y 0) To OMW 6770 0 10 j L\d SIV e9 lei zhp Vi nv tYfA Y041 &- '.lr4P iffy. $0 *Ire. XNV. —�4 2,9, ���.� �y� , 1 , � ;.1 t ` bSc-: � K vf . 4Z; W-r Lot 5 < 7; 3 5r 6 goo rr 6� C4 716 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/91-26 Planning Commission Meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: 1672 South Greeley Street Comprehensive Plan District: Industrial Park Zoning District: Business Park Commercial, BP-C Applicant's Name: Larry Axdahl and Sheldon Pearson Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION:_ Modification to sign plan and variance to the Sign Ordinance for two signs (one wall and one free-standing sign, one permitted) and variance to tree setback requirement (fifteen feet required). DISCUSSION: The request is for a five foot by four foot, twenty square foot sign. The sign would have the name of the two tenants. This would be considered two signs for each tenant. Other similar uses in the park have one wall or free-standing sign per business. RECOMMENDATION: Denial. ATTACHMENTS: - Application - Plans. Case Number ��� = �2�__ Fee Paid _--___-w_ Data Filed______ .PI-ANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: egal DQ'scription of Prapert� y ----------_-___------------------------ Owner: Name ----------------------- -------------------------------- Address ------------------ Phone: 3q -a4�c0 Acipliccnt (if other than owne,): acme �e �Zt 1 ' �. _ Phone. __� Add_11�_� �_ ----- - ---------- Type of Request:- ___ Rezonina ___ Approval "of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plot _ Variance _-- Other ____------- S i' h ea.r a u l e V a+rdl — Description o-' Request:------------------------------------5 e E'_ , - �__- _ ----- -._____ Siancture of A oliccnt: Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------- NOTE: Snetch of proposed property and structure to be crawu �n bac oz t.`�.s�c�r;`0-�- tacned, showing the following: 1. North direction. Ile-' � h �a. 2. Location of proposed str acture on lot - Dimensions of iron' and side set-bac''-s- a. Dimensions of proposed structure. y�� •' �:,,, �,��' 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent e--sting buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ___________ (date) subject to the following conditions: _-_______________________________ Approved _-_ Denied __- by the Council on _ rollowing conditions: subiect to t:,a Ccim,ments-k- (Use other side) pq� f 7 ON L 1'. 1 . . I Loc- o-+ ' o it\ oh 40 vv%e- -Dee-., PI Pn(Le-lm t. m Legal Description 1672 South Greeley Street East 183 feet of the North 260 feet of all that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Sec. 33 Township 30 North Range 20 west Washington Co. Mn. described as follows to -wit: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said tract, and running thence NuiLh along the West line of said tract 822 feet to a point, running thence East at right angles, 489 feet, more or less, to the centerline ,mf the traveled road running northerly and southerly across said tract; running thence South along the centerline of said traveled road to the South line of said tract, and running thence West along the South line of said tract to the place of beginning. CkL-A C72 z � 01 r e i f 3. Dimensions of front and side set backs 8 ft. from sidewalk 4. Dimensions of prop)sed structure Length - 5 feet width - 4 feet . _ :`�t. ::; �..�s: yr^iJ�'•f '.��:--: 5�sr.tf.• �. i�' " •i"'.. _ : �. ra�i",�.'i � ,. PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUP/91-27 Planning Commission Meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: 114 East Chestnut Street Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District Zoning District: CBD Owner's Name: Martha and Duane Hubbs Type of Application: Special Use Permit Project Description: A Special Use Permit for a guest house inn with three rooms and indoor/ outdoor public dining at 114 East Chestnut Street. Discussion The request is to conduct a three bedroom inn and small restaurant at 114 East Chestnut Street. The commercial use of this house will compliment the existing commercial uses in the Downtown. The three bedroom inn will provide overnight accommodations within walking distance of businesses in the area with minimal impact on parking. The site has approximately four parking spaces to accommodate this use. The restaurant use on this site is proposed to accommodate between forty to sixty customers. Indoor/outdoor dining will be provided. The Fire Department must inspect the first level of the structure in order to determine the occupancy capacity. Other building related items must be reviewed. Parking on Chestnut Street, Second Street and Third Street is less intense than other areas of the Downtown. If a parking ramp is constructed on Second Street and Olive Street (Auditorium Lot) it will provide additional parking. The parking generation for the indoor restaurant use is approximately eight parking spaces. Additional parking will be needed for the exterior dining use. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A site plan for the eating area shall be submitted to the City before the business opens. 2. No live bands shall be permitted outdoors. 3. A sign plan shall be submitted for Design Review. 4. A report from the Public Health Department shall be submitted for this case file. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public welfare Central Business District. ATTACHMENTS: tion Form - Development Report - Survey. injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise . The use will be in harmony with the CBD, PAC 100 CASE NUMBER Caso Numbor,4. /q�J_ Fee Paid Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location of Property: 114 E. Chestnut S t i I lwa to ram_ MN ________ Legal Description of Property: ---..___. - ________________-____--_-___- Owner: Name __Duane_& Martha Hubbs Address _626_N__4thi_Stillwater.,_MN_-_ Phone: - (612) 430-2895 Applicant (if other than owner): Name____-____-__-_----_-_-_________-- Address------------------------------ Phone: --------------- Typo of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat xxx Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat -__ Variance . __ Other ___________________ Description of Request: __and_indoor_Public_dill for_appro; iuL tL forty __ In addidtion, __garden_dininZ_ to_be_.Provided_ May thru Septemiaer __ Comp,lete rehab of property included in project. Signature of Applicant: _L -..._-_-_--____� -� Date of Public Hearing: --------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this tached, showing the following:, 1. North direction. rf 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. ' 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. -, 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. .: 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. 4� Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (duce) subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------------ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the followingconditions:------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments. (Use other side), RE: Development •- 114 E. Chestnut St. Stillwater PROPOSED USAGE - Three guest rooms will be developed on the second floor and interior furnished and decorated to its appropriate 1848 period. Modern facilities will be tucked in to accomodate guests. A Victorian style restaurant will be developed on the first floor which will also be decorated and furnished in the appropriate period. Seating will be limited and should be 40 to 50. Exterior garden dining will be provided during spring, summer and fall season. Anticipated exterior seating to be approximately 60. Victorian High Teas and appropriate summer fare to be included. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - EXTERIOR - We anticipate no exterior changes to the building. (other than standard maintenance items such as painting and roofing). Development of formal gardens, pathways and patio areas plus addition of gazebo structure - all appropriate to the period of this building. TVTFRTnv- First floor - We anticipate no major structural changes in floor design. The formal parlour and dining room will be developed into two dining areas, the current bath will be re -aligned to accomodate seperate male/female facilities and the current kitchen area will be redeveloped to its original configuration. Second floor - We anticipate no major structural changes in floor design. The current format (less current temporary walls) is compatable to proposed usage. Each bedroom will include a private bath in side rooms which currently exist. Basement - Commercial kitchen will be developed below grade and will have no impact on the main structure as this area currently has no use or function. a 11 va% 'Px �5 L, u o 0 7 L 0 0 f) Tell Ln -53 el * 6 I i water, THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA mrMnIPAND11M TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING STAFF DATE: MAY 8, 1991 SUBJECT: GARAGE VARIANCE - CASE NO. V/91-28 Allen Zepper, Building Official, reviewed the proposal for 808 South Third Street. He felt the neighbor's garage to the south would be much too close to the proposed garage. Problems will arise with the overhang on the new garage with the overhang on the neighboring structure. Mr. Zepper recommends the garage be placed with at least a three foot setback on the side property line with the fire rating as conditioned. The gutters are to be installed so drainage will not impact the neighboring property. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/91-28 Planning Commission Meeting: May 13, 1991 Project Location: 808 South Third Street Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential Zoning District: RB Applicant's Name: Daniel St. Claire Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A Variance to the sideyard and rearyard setback requirements (five feet rearyard and sideyard required, two feet rearyard and sideyard requested) for the construction of a two car garage. DISCUSSION: The request is to construct a two car garage in the rearyard of a property. The site is located on South Third Street and has a large home on a small lot as are many homes in this area of Stillwater. A driveway is placed on the north side of the lot which presently provides access to an existing one car garage. The existing garage has less than the required setbacks. Due to the small rearyard area, a two car garage located on the site of the existing garage is reasonable. It will provide a small open space between the garage and the home. A garage located to the south of the parcel also has substandard setbacks. These 'two garages are between three to five apart. Due to this spacing, the garage will have to be built with a one -hour rating as per the Uniform Building Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The new garage shall be constructed with a one -hour fire rating and other Uniform Building Code regulations. 2. All drainage from the roof shall remain on the site so the adjacent properties will not be impacted. 3. There shall be no openings on the south wall of the property. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: The granting of this variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land and building. This is the minimum variance to accomplish the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: -a n - Application Form. 1'AC 100 Cush Numbor _ � � �•� Fee Paid __- ------------- CASE NU14BER Date Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FOI% ' Street Location of Property: ---------- Legal Description of Property: Owner: Name _-__-_--_____--_____-__ Address __ Ds ___ ____ Y___ — _ Phone: Applicant (if other than owner): Name_-__-__--___________________-__-- Address------------------------------- Phone ---------------- Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat Other __w________________ Description of Request: __2e :v ; Signature of cant: A plip, - _ Date of Public Hearing: --------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn, on back of this fora -or, at- tached, showing the following: '. •t 1. North direction. a 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. _ 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. c 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. . 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by the 'Planning Commission on ----------- (duce) subject to the following conditions: ________________..______-_______-____ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the ,ol owing conditions -------------------------------------------------- Comments. (Use other side), RT 10, IA o 1water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ONE YEAR REVIEW SPECIAL USE PERMIT 626 NORTH FOURTH STREET BACKGROUND On Apra 1, 1990, the Stillwater City Council approved a Special Use Permit to Duane and Martha Hubbs to conduct small group tours, small business meetings, and small weddings at the William Sauntry Bed and Breakfast, 626 North Fourth Street (Case No. SUP/90-17). Due to the controversial nature of this Special Use Permit request, a condition was placed on the permit which states "This permit shall be reviewed one year from this approval (April 1, 1990) (or upon complaint) at a notified public hearing. It has been one year since this Special Use Permit was issued. DISCUSSION Tne City has received no complaints on the small function use or the Bed and Breakfast use at 626 North Fourth Street. All "Conditions of Approval" as attached have been followed. The Hubbs operate a quality establishment and their business has been a positive addition to the City. Tile Hubbs have no complaints with the City of Stillwater. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Condition No. 11 be changed from "One Year Review" to "Upon Complaint" only. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CASE NO. SUP/90-17 1. A maximum of six special events (large functions defined as business meetings, bus tours, bridal and wedding showers, anniversaries, weddings and wedding receptions, and church functions) over twenty persons allowed per month. 2. All special event visitors shall park on site or at a controlled remote location. 3. Limit of groups: 40 capacity as approved unless special approval is obtained from the City Council. 4. Food must be served by a licensed caterer. 5. All special events shall be over by 9:00 P.M. 6. No open bar on premises for special events. Champagne is allowed on a two person/one bottle limit. 7. No outside entertainment or lighting for special events is allowed. 8. No persons to leave premises of the Inn with alcohol. 9. No live entertainment or loud reproduced music shall be allowed. 10. Innkeepers must be present and visible at all special events. 11. This permit shall be reviewed one year from this approval (April 1, 1990) (or upon complaint) at a notified Public Hearing before the City Council. 12. Duane and Martha Hubbs, owners of the property, shall be on site during all special events. This use is not transferable.