HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-06 CPC Packetate
r S
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
June 6, 1990
THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, JUNE 11, 1990 AT 7:00
P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NORTH R H STREET.
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes - May 14, 1990.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. CASE NO. V/90-19 - Variance to the sideyard setback requirements for the
addition to an existing garage and conversion of an existing garage into
habitable living space at 1124 Parkwood Lane in the RA, Single Family
Residential District. David Widmyer, Applicant.
2. CASE NO. V/90-27 - Variance to the lot size requirements for the
subdivision of a 13,400 square foot lot into two lots of 6,700 square feet
(7,500 square feet required) at 1215 South Third Street in the RB, Two
Family Residential District. Wallace Nelson, Jr., Applicant.
3. CASE NO. V/90-29 - Variance to the rearyard setback requirements (three
feet proposed, 1en feet required) for the construction of a garage addition
at 321 West Olive Street in the RCM, Multiple Family Residential District.
Tim Parker and M. Calver, Applicants.
4. CASE NO. V/90-30 - Variance to the sideyard setback requirements (five feet
required, two teet proposed) for the construction of a garage addition at
122 South Sherburne Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
James Kallem, Applicant.
5. CASE NO. SUP/90-32 - Special Use Permit to conduct a mail order business
out of an apartment at 1451 South Greeley Street (Apt. 111) in the RCM,
Multiple Family Residential District. Cindy L. Multer, Applicant.
6. CASE NO. SUB/90-33 - A /PUD Amendment for Concept Approval of a sixty two
unit Planned nit Development on a thirteen acre parcel and final PUD
approval for the fourteen unit First Phase Development located between the
Green's Townhomes and the Townhomes at Oak Glen on McKusick Road in the CA,
Single Family Residential District. Bruggeman Construction, Applicant.
7. CASE NO. PUD/90-34 - Final Plat Approval for the first addition of a PUD
Amendment consisting of a fourteen unit Planned Unit Development between
the Greens Townhomes and the Townhomes at Oak Glen on McKusick Road in the
CA, Single Family Residential District. Bruggeman Construction, Applicants.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
Planning Commission Agenda (Continued)
June 11, 1990
8. CASE NO. SUP/90-35 - Special Use Permit for two offices in an existing
resi entta structure (Arlington Apartments) located at 160-200 South Third
Street in the RCM, Multiple Family Residential District. Richard Kilty,
Applicant.
9. CASE NO. V/90-36 - Variance to the front and sideyard setback requirements
for the construction of a parking structure along with improving an
existing street easement at 160-200 South Third Street in the RCM, Multiple
Family Residential District. Richard Kilty, Applicant.
10. CASE NO. V/90-28 - Variance to the lot depth requirements (83 feet
proposed, 100 feet required) for a subdivision of a 32,640 square foot lot
into two lots of 9,960 square feet (83 feet lot depth) and 22,680 at 801
West Pine Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. James and
Ingrid Lund, Applicants.
11. CASE NO. V/90-37 - Variance to the frontyard setback requirements (15 feet
proposed, 30 required) for the construction of a home on Willard Street
(refer to Case V/90-28) between William and Martha Streets in the RB, Two
Family Residential District. James and Ingrid Lund, Applicants.
OTHER BUSINESS
12. CASE ZAT/90-2 - A Zoning Text Amendment rescinding the IP-I Industrial Park
Industrial Zoning District and replacing it with a BP -I Business Park -
Industrial District. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
13. CASE NO. ZAM/90-2 - A Zoning Map Amendment designating lands in the
Stillwater Business Park BP -I, Business Park -Industrial District. City of
Stillwater, Applicant.
14. CASE NO. ZAT/90-3 - A Zoning Text Amendment rescinding the IP-Ci Industrial
Park Commercial One District and replacing it with the BP-0, Business Park
Office District. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
15. CASE NO. ZAM/90-3 - A Zoning Map Amendment designating lands in the
Stillwater Business Park BP-0, Business Park Office District. City of
Stillwater, Applicant.
16. CASE NO. ZAT/90-4 - A Zoning Text Amendment rescinding the IP-C Industrial
Park -Commercial and replacing it with the BP-C Business Park Commercial
District. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
17. CASE NO. ZAM/90-4 - A Zoning Map Amendment designating lands in the
Stillwater Business Park BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. City of
Stillwater, Applicant.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-19
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 1124 Parkwood Lane
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Dave Widmyer
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A variance to the sideyard setback requirements (ten feet required, six feet
requested) for a garage addition and conversion of an existing garage into
habitable space.
DISCUSSION:
T e request is to construct a twelve foot by twenty foot garage addition to
the front of a home and to convert the back half of the garage into a family
room. This case was heard by the Planning Commission on April 9, 1990 for a
variance to the frontyard setback requirements. The request was approved by
the Planning Commission and City Council on May 1, 1990 with the following
conditions of approval.
1. The roof drainage from the garage shall remain on the site.
2. As much as a nine foot variance to frontyard setback allowed (twenty
one foot setback).
When the Widmyer's came in to pick up their building permit, a Certificate of
Survey was reviewed. The survey indicated that the ten foot sideyard setback
from the South property line was actually six feet. A ten foot sideyard
setback must be maintained for habitable living space.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Same as previously conditioned.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
For reasons stated, the granting of the variance is reasonable use of the home
and this is the minimum variance that will accomplish this.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Site Plan
- Certificate of Survey
C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 645-3646 •-
1361 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55108
FOR: .j
j ORRIN. C. THOMPSON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION J�(
0
-�N
1d 8.S
Lot 15, Block 5, Croixwood Second
Addition, Washington County, Minnesota
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY .OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY,
THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
Doted this 9rM day oF_%��;Q✓'f A.D. 19"-� C. R. WIND N 8 ASSOCIATES, N
by
Survayor, Minnesota' Rapisfrofion No.�
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-27
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 1215 South Third Street
Comprehensive Plan District: RB
Zoning District: Two Family Residential
Applicant's Name: Wallace Nelson, Jr.
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A variance to the lot size requirements for the subdivision of a 13,400 square
foot lot into two lots of 6,700 square feet.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to subdivide an existing lot of 13,400 square feet with an
existing house into two lots. The existing house is located on the north 6,700
square foot lot and the south lot will be vacant. The lot split will cause a
variance situation for the existing home sideyard setback (seven feet, ten
feet required). The owner plans to build a house on the vacant lot. The lot
size requirement for the RB District is 7,500 square feet.
The vacant lot slopes east from the front of the lot. A house built on this
site may interrupt the natural surface drainage. A grading plan should be
submitted showing where all surface water will drain.
IF APPROVED, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. If a house is built on the vacant lot, it must meet all setback
requirements for the RB District.
2. A grading plan must be submitted that shows no additional run-off on
the neighbors property if the lot is to be buildable.
RECOMMENDATION: Denial.
REQUIRED FINDINGS:
The granting of this variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Site plan.
PAC: 50o
. Case plumber
T ••
c
Fee Paid _-_
Date Filed
PLANNING ADMlN1S i ZAi 1VE FORM
1215 South 3rd street
Street Location of Property: ..___..__________________________-_____---__
Legal Description of Property: _LOTS 15_&_16 B3_C'��J�CRILL & iVELSON'S 2nd___
Owner: Name __UALLACE_D_ -L v6LSQ , JL:_--------------------------------
Address PO_i3On 156 _ STILLFWTIM _, iilJ 55082 _ Phone: B. 439 _2924- H . 439-1566
Applicant (if other than owner): Name _________________________________
Address -_- _______-- _________-_ Phone ----------------
Type of Request:' ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
Variance
_Would like to -split lot in half_( rasul:tiii- in two lots
Description of Request;
-50 ft x 134-ft and be^able to-build.on-e?:ipty^]ot----------------------
------------____---_..________________--s_-_-------_ _ �
9 P�_--___----
Signature of Applicant:
Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------------
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this form ox "}
tached, showing the following: r?ais�y3w
1. North direction.��
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. .[�l� �y _
3. Dimensions of front and side set-backs.y'i�g�0 •N
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. QQra
7. Other information as may be requested.
�1 C
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on ----------- (dd,
subject to the following conditions: ____________________________________
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to t;;e
following conditions. __�-___-__--__-___-- __-_______________________
___-_ e .
Comments. (Use other side),
"a::;114ngcon trounty
April. '27, 1990
0
JO ,-
St+�� �
t� �t
o' � W EGG n,SCr `AN0�1
ozlr _ �J
x� Cl
/1�It. 3-If
1b
v
PL" 6--3 8- ��-
The information relating to the dimensions and location shown on this exhibit are based upon the recorded Plat or map
in the County Records and/or inspection of the property. The liability of the issuing agent and the Company as to infor-
mation contained herein is limited to that contained in Endorsement Form No, 2071. THIS is NOT A SUitVEY.
National Title Resources Corp. 1310 East Highwat/ 96, White Bear Lake. MinnN,¢nta shin (47,) id?A.q,<7C
TOTAL P.02
v
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
CASE NO. V/90-29
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 321 West Olive Street
Zoning District: RCM, Multiple Family Residential
Applicant's Name: Tim Parker and Marilyn Calver
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description:
Variance to the rearyard setback requirements (three feet proposed, ten feet
required) for the construction of a garage addition.
Discussion:
e request is to add a ten by twenty one foot garage addition to an existing
twenty two by twenty one foot garage. The garage will then be a three car
garage, thirty two feet by twenty one feet. An average garage in the City of
Stillwater is twenty four by twenty four. The variance requested is for the
rearyard setback. The site plan shows that it is approximately three feet from
the property line. If it is less than three feet, no openings on that side of
the garage would be allowed according the the United Building Code. The
adjacent house to the south is only nine feet from the property line.
IF APPROVED, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. All roof drainage shall remain on -site.
2. There shall be no openings on the south wall.
RECOMMENDATION: Denial.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Application
- Site Plan
Case Number _K,17°_
Fee Paid __ J ------
Dote Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM -
32( WESC OL/UC Sr,2�T Sl-G—e
Street Location of Property: ------------------------------------------ .
Legal Description of Property: ----------------------------------------
//M � 2GCrANb /1/Ai V_14--V4 GA-e-V`
Owner: Name ___ _____-___________------------------------ __-___
3
Address 2 f W r$� C OL.106�c.Lt,.l'� —:_:;e one: __-¢3� 6/
__-_--
------------• -- 1 � -
Applicant (if other than owner): Name ---------------------------------
Address------------------------------ Phone. ---------------
Type of Reciuest. _-_ Rezoning -__ Approval of Preliminary Plat
_✓Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
--- Variance --- Other ----------- --------
Description of Request:
0/ -dive%- Cejc st��2�_
_2 0,`i__usl�q-- �e_rap¢ _wtio��------------
Signature of Applicant: �-fi_1 ___------
Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------------.
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on back or at-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. ry,
1 U. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. a` �Y
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. r— C ��.•�� ��
5. Street names.y'
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other iniormation as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied :.__ by the'Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------------
Approved _-- Denied ___ by the Council on
-subject tothe-':-,;
-
following conditions: ----------------------_______--__-__-__---------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other side),
o-
F-
Jb.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V190-30
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 122 South Sherburne Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family
Zoning District: RB
Applicant's Name: James Kallem
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A variance to the sideyard setback requirements for the construction of a
garage addition.
DISCUSSION:
1`he request is to add an addition to an existing garage, thereby increasing
the width and depth of the garage to approximately 24 feet by 26 feet. A
variance must be sought because the north wall of the garage is approximately
two feet from the property line as shown on the attached site plan.
The garage addition has been incorporated into the structure as it exists
today A need for a variance was determined after the garage project had
started. The work was directed to stop until a variance request was submitted
to the City of Stillwater and the proper review and determination on the
variance was made by the Planning Commission and City Council according to the
Zoning Ordinance.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. There shall be no openings on the north wall.
2. All drainage from the roof shall remain on site.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The granting of this variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the
building and this is the minimum variance that will accomplish such a purpose.
ATTACHMENT:
S to Plan.
7�
- - - -------
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
CASE NO. SUP/90-32
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 1451 South Greeley Street, Apt. 111.
Comprehensive Plan District: Multiple Family Residential
Zoning District: RCM
Applicant's Name: Cindy J. Multer
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Special Use Permit to conduct a mail order business out of an apartment.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to conduct a small mail order business out of an apartment.
There will be no customers or deliveries at the location. The applicant has
stated that she has a Post Office box, so no mail will actually be delivered
to the stated address.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. There shall be no sign identifying the business on the exterior of the
apartment complex.
2. There shall be no employees other than the applicant who resides at
the site.
3. The use shall be reviewed upon complaint.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENT: Letter.
Case Number�O = 3'�
Fee Paid .._ $50 ----------
Date. Filed _ May 31_, -1 9 9 0
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location or Property: ,�- 5South- __ Greeley Street Apt.111 Stillwater, MN
„ , 14__1_.�
Legal Doscripiion of Property:_1 __ bedroom - apartment -__--.__..__-____..__-
Owner. Name _ Cindy -J_- Multer---_._._.____-____-__-_-_- -_r__
��__ _ 1451 S. Greeley St. apt.111 430-3355
Aar, Cs�------------------------------ Phone ----------------
Stillwater, MN Ap•olicant (if other than owner): dame ____-----________________________
Address ------------------------------- Phone: -_------
Type of Request:. ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plc;
_X Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
___ Variance ___ Other ______-_____,.______
Description of Request- ___Please see-attatched paper.--------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Applicant: -if
____________
Date of Public Hearing: ________________---________-_--_____- -_.
NO=: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n 'back 02 t112 for.., or at-
tached, snowing the following:
1.
North direction.
2.
Location of proposed structure on lot.
�� [��
r
3.
Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
���n•
�_�
4.
Dimensions of proposed structure.
5.
Street names.
�5
+
6.
Location of adjacent e-xisting buildings.
7.
Other info=ation as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ----------- �d6
subject to the following conditions: --_-__-__________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council an
rollowing conditions: _________________
___r________ subject. to t:,e
Comrnents. (Use other side)
May 31, 1990
The City of Stillwater:
I am Planning to start a mail order business. I'll be work-
ing with a college financial planning service in California.
No inventory is required except forms that will be sent out
to students and other miscellaneous paperwork. There will be
no traffic in and out of my apartment since everything will
be done by mail. I will have a post office box to receive
any inquiries from students, so no mail will be delivered to
my apartment mailbox. I will also be applying for a certif-
icate of assumed name for my business, and abiding by any
legal rules that apply to me.
I hope I have been clear and concise with my proposal and
would appreciate your consideration. If there are any further
questions, please phone me at 430-3355. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Cindy J. Multer
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/90-33
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: North of McKusick Road between the Greens Townhomes and Oak
Glen Townhomes.
Comprehensive Plan District: Residential
Zoning District: Single Family PUD
Applicant's Name: Bruggeman Corporation
Type of Application: Subdivision Plan/Fourteen Lots
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Fourteen unit - fifteen lot preliminary plat.
DISCUSSION
Trie request is for a fifteen lot, fourteen unit, townhouse subdivision. The
fourteen units are in two unit or four unit configuration. New utility and
drainage easements will be required on the Final Plat as required by the City
Engineer. The proposal is consistent with the previously and new PUD plan for
the site.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDING
The Preliminary Plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and previously
approved PUD.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Utility and drainage easements as required by the City Engineer shall
be shown on the Final Plat.
2. The Final Plat shall be recorded before building permits are issued.
3. All new or relocated utilities shall be provided for before final plat
approval.
ATTACHMENT:
- Preliminary Plat.
7 100
.a...+ mf
•'� i a, � � Cs � 1
a p \0
o, LOT 15 a ,
BLOCK I
I ' /
14 �J
l
II 1
n _
o �
o �
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Lot I. )!lock 2 OAR GLEN 3RD ADDITION. ..co 21nq to th. --ded
pl.,cn.c.ol. R—y County. Ni+u —c..
,r 33' TYP.
q2!T,l.
3.4 3A
4 UNIT BLCG- 2 UNIT'SLUG.
TYPICAL LOTS
13EF /UILDINO PLAN FOR DINpmOMI
SITE DATA
1ST ADDITKNI 28 ACRES
Md(USICK RO. LANE N. (EOCST. RCM 1.3 ACRES
FURhiEDEVEI.OPMENT B Q A R=c
TOTAL 13.0 ACRES
1ST ADDITION (14 D.U.) 5.0 D.UINET ACRE
gnnJ¢pEygLCq¢T{T (00 I.) 540L7_METACRE
TOTAL (62 D.U.) 5.3 D.UJNET ACRE
DRAWN BY
CAP
DATE
6 -1-90
REVISIONS
BOOK / PAGE
PROJECT NO.
0141
FILE NO.
SHEET 2 OF 3
Case Number �
aG Qo
Fee Paid
Date Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE: FORM
Street Locetion of Property: County Road-64 and-McKusick Road Lane North
Leccl Do'scrip,ion of Property; See Attached
Owner: __Bruggeman Construction Company_____________
Address _3564_ Rol 1 i ng_Vi Pw Dri y�--__--___ P„• one•
L. -- 70__981____--
Applicant (ir other tHomer Brug�iemnhan owner): cme _--____-- ___________--____--
Address------------------------------ Phone ----------------
Type of Request.* ___ Rezonina XX Approval'of Preliminary Plc: ($60.00)
($250.00) XX `� ___
c rmit Approval of Final. Plat
--- Variance _-- Other --------------------
Desc.iption of Reaves; SUP -for a_PUD Amendment and PreliminarY_PiaL_of____
Fairway Collection Pha _P_L------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Signature of Applicant:
Data of Public Hearing-- ---------------------------------
NOTEE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n'bacl, oz ttiis ioi 1 or
al-
6-a-ched, showing the following:
1. North direction �
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. CQ of��
3. Dimensions or. i_cnt and side set -bads. � �s���
a_ Dimensions of or000sed structure.
U 5. St_eet nanwsses. • /. �V
6. Location of adiacent existing buildings. �� Dt
7. Other infozzmation as rray be requested. 1, ,
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on -----______ (dct2}
subject to the following conditions: __---------------------------------
-
Approved _-_ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
;allowing conditions:-----------------------------------------------
----------------
Ca,;.ments: (Use other side)
tit
LEGAL DE RIPTZ N FOR CONCEET P D QNLY
Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2 OAK GLEN 3RD ADDITION,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota,
except that part platted as THE GREENS TOWNHOMES ON OAK GLEN and
that part platted as OAK GLEN TOWNHOUSE PLAT 1, according to the
recorded plat thereof, said Ramsey County.
Together with
Outlot C and Lots 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 Block 1 THE GREENS TOWNHOMES ON
OAK GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
LEGAL DESCRIPIMN EOR PRELIUTNARY PLAT ONL-Y
Lot 1, Block 2 OAK GLEN 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. PUD/90-34
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: Vacant property on the North side of McKusick Road between
the Greens Townhomes and Oak Glen Townhomes.
Zoning District: Single Family PUD
Applicant's Name: Bruggeman Corporation
Type of Application: Modification to Concept PUD approval and Final Approval
for First Addition (fourteen housing units).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Sixty two att�hed single family residences on 15.5 acres of land.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to modify a previously approved Planned Unit Development permit
(PUD) reconfiguring and reducing the number of single family attached unit
from seventy two to sixty two and final PUD approval for the fourteen unit
first addition. The previously approved PUD plans showed seventy two attached
units, twelve 4 unit structures and twelve 2 unit structures. The current
proposal is for sixty two units, four 4 unit structures and twenty three two
unit structures as shown on the attached plans and described in the PUD
narrative application.
When the Oak Glen Development was first approved, roads and utilities were
installed for the original planned development configuration. This modified is
in basically the same arrangement but some of the units are reoriented
requiring possible relocation of water or sewer lines. The City Engineer is
reviewing the plans and will comment on what changes will be necessary before
building permits can be issued.
The site plan shows the sixty two units in 2 unit or 4 unit buildings.
Frontyard setbacks for the project range from 50 feet to 20 feet. The minimum
distance between structures is 20 feet. Minimum rear setback to the Golf
Course show 20 feet and setback from McKusick Road 30 feet.
It is recommended that the following minimum setback be met.
Front -Garage 20 feet
Side between buildings 20 feet
From McKusick Roadl 30 feet
Rear -Golf Course 25 feet
This may require the repositioning of some structures or elimination of some
three season porches facing the Golf Course.
C IGO
Case Number ����� - 3 L/
c
Fee Paid
Dave Flied
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORS;
J � /
Street Location of Property:
Legal Do* cription of Property: _-_--_-_----____________________-----_-__
Owner: game ---X--J71'
--- �'? _________________--
Addres�' `__--_ Phone:
s ------------ =--
Applicant (if other than owper). Liam ___ -_____---________________--___-
Address ------------------------------ Phone: --------------
Type of Request: Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary PIat
Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Pla;
_-_ Variance ___ Other _---__-___-_•.______
Description of Request: -------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Applicant: ___sCl�yo �33_
Date of Public Hearing:
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back of tl-i fo-T or'at-
tamed, snowing the following:
1. North direction. ;'k. R'
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. •J�`+y•' y
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
a. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names. r!
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other iniorrnation as may be requested.
Approved _-_ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
sublet: to the following conditions: ------------------------------------
Approved --_ Denied _-_ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
following conditions:-____--_________________________.-.______-______--
Cornments. (Use other side)
JAMES R. HILL, INC.
PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
9401 JAMEs AVE. SO., SUITE 140, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 612/884-3029 Fix 884-9518
FAIRWAY COLLECTION
PUD NARRATIVE
Stillwater, Minnesota
Mr. Homer Bruggeman, Bruggeman Construction Company, has submitted an
application for a special use permit in order to amend the Oak Glen
Planned Unit Development. The subject property consists of 15.5 acres
located east of McKusick Road North, west of the golf course and between
The Greens Townhomes On Oak Glen plat and Oak Glen Townhouse Plat 1.
The property is legally described as the Oak Glen 3rd Addition and
Outlot C, Block 1, The Greens Townhomes On Oak Glen. This area was
originally planned for 70 attached townhome units.
The proposed Fairway Collection PUD is also single family attached units
with either four or two units per building. A total of 62 units are
proposed - 4 quad home buildings and 23 twin homes.
The property is designated for single family residential on the City's
Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map. The property is currently zoned
R-A single family residential. Planned Unit Developments are permitted
by special use permit in a R-A zone.
The following exhibits and plans have been submitted describing the
proposed Fairway Collection PUD:
1. PUD Concept Plan. (Showing the location of 62 units on the
entire 15± acres.)
2. PUD Preliminary Plan - Phase I. (Showing three twin homes
and two quad homes totaling 14 units.)
* Site and Landscaping Plan
* Preliminary Plat
* Preliminary Grading Plan
* Preliminary Utility Plan
3. Building elevations and general floor plans.
Bruggeman Construction respectfully requests Planning Commission and
City Council review and approval of the Concept PUD, the PUD Amendment
for Phase I and the replatting of Phase I.
i�
�D
FU
M
y-
AIR m $ A WAY COLLECTIONS P U D
T P c y IYILLMFAT"* MM r
D �1 James R. Hill, inC.
CONCEPT P U "- - w-r: {
FOR .,....:.».. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS
kl o BRUOOEMAN CORPORATION -�•�"y �'�' "" "' " "" "� """""
vn. •.....Y r(I vn�rr.wwm ■�AII LAR •,Ya �Hn �• fli/lll Ifll i.w nn
I�p33
- �
• �
• f
• I - I - I - I
. I
i
�1�1F4�1FIFf�1�i��
J
t
mN FAIRWAY COLLECTIONS 1ST ADDITION -_�' James R. HIII inc.
$ m o $ RTILLwAT[R, Yw .�.-.. ...-.. ..
n PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE / LANDSCAPE PLAN {
z Z; - o PoR ...�. j PLANNERS / ENGINEERS/ SURVEYORS
u •Jt �j. �. t- / 1111 I.— 1., I. 1.... M I..........
3t1 1f11�
R ,0 R000EMAN CORPORATION
o m
Itt. ROIIIrO Ylew 0111rt wNIT■ tt•A LAtt r14 I�IIt
m COLLECTIONS FAIRWAY COL1ST ADDITION
_ .,ILLx.=��, YY, James R. Hill, inc.
_ - n� PRELIMINARY UTILITY & GRADING PLAN �7:""^ �i
FOR PLANNERS,/ ENGINEERS / SURVEY
...........
ORS
$ R BRUGGEMAN CORPORATION z.'_••sf.� uu lun In . •• illli
o i m
w
w
f„4 POLLING YIlM OYI Yl,M"IT■ ■SAY LAR I, Y,L f,t,. -•••'[N•«inn ,11e 1,11,1� ••• 11•,111
|
m
L- '-
[l[---(|---|
u/_-_�/-__|
z
0
J
w
��
�c
W
w
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/90-35
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 160-200 South Third Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Multiple Family Residential
Zoning District: RCM
Applicant's Name: Richard Kilty
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Special Use Permit for two offices in the Arlington Apartments.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to convert the existing apartment units on the first floor of
the Arlington into two professional offices. One office will be 680 square
feet and the other 1,115 square feet. The apartment building was built as the
Jassoy Block in 1886. The original first floor of this structure contained
offices. The applicant plans to restore the facade of this structure to its
original state with a traditional front which reflects the era in which the
Jassoy Block was built.
The parking requirement for the office space and the six apartments is
eighteen spaces. Twelve spaces are required for the residential use and six
are required for the office use. The proposed plan for parking, nineteen
spaces, meets this requirement. Refer to Case V/90-36.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The exterior modifications of the structure shall be reviewed by the
Heritage Preservation Commission according to Stillwater City Code 2.10
and 31.01, Subd. 27.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
TFie proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
App cation Form
- Letter from Richard Kilty
.0 100
Case
S_ye _y�a , 3
Number
U�
Fee Paid------ �3 -------
Date. Filed ___-Z/
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORK%
Street Location or Property: _�' ��'S
r
Legal Description of Property:
owner. Name __--��•�'� �` �-��---________________--_____
Aadr ess /f-- ---- z _Phone:
Applicont (if other than owner): Name _
Address------------------------------ Phone:_______________
Type o' Request: ___ Rezoning -__ Approval of Preliminary Plat
.� Special Use Permit .___ Approval of Final. Plot -
Variance ___ Other __--____-__f.______
Description o-" Request: -----
zw
Sic
Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------- "_______�I_�____
NOTD: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be draw -a )n back oi '.his ;o.... or at.
tached, showing the following: r25
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot
3. Dimensions of front and side set-bac:�s. ►� � , cw
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. W J5.,
5. Street names. 0:
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. �S
7. Other iniorrnation as may be requested. s-,, C,,
c�
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on -------------- e)
subject- to the following conditions: ------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the
'allowing conditions: __
Cornnients: (Use other side)
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-36
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 160-200 South Third Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Multiple Family Residential
Zoning District: RCM
Applicant's Name: Richard Kilty
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Variance to the front and sideyard setback requirements for the construction
of a parking structure and using and improving existing Chestnut Street
right-of-way easement for a driveway.
DISCUSSION:
is request consists of constructing a ten car parking structure, improving
an existing street easement (Chestnut Street) as a driveway, and re-
constructing a garage.
The required setback for an accessory structure in the RCM District is; front
45 feet, side and rear ten feet. For the parking structure, the plans show a
three foot frontyard setback and no setback on the side. The reconstructed
garage has a one foot sideyard setback and backs up into the hill.
Although the proposal does not meet setback requirements, it provides needed
parking and is consistent with the minimum setbacks that exist east along
Chestnut Street and in the Downtown.
The elevations and sections show the structure constructed of tan colored
keystone blocks with rock faced concrete block end posts and metal guard
railing. Acorn light standards, similar in design to those seen in Lowell
Park, will be used 'to light the lot. The finish of the block and railing
detail are not provided. The tan color should be similar to the natural
limestone seen in the area along the cliffs. The new garage will use the
existing retaining walls and have a brick veneer. The type and color of brick
facing is not indicated but can be considered by the Design Review Committee
along with parking structure materials and colors. The proposal uses the
extended Chestnut Street right-of-way for driveway access to the parking
areas. An existing stairs leading up the hill to West Chestnut Street runs
through the right-of-way. This pedestrian way should remain open during
construction.
Utility lines may be located on the project site. Their location should be
verified by the developer and construction in the area of the lines approved
by the Public Works Department.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The exterior design elements of the parking structure, garage and
pedestrian way shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee (July
1, 1990) before Council decision.
2. All utility lines shall be verified and construction in the area of the
utility lines approved by the Public Works Department before
construction.
3. A grading/drainage plan and landscape plan shall be submitted and
approved with the construction plans for a parking structure.
4. The parking spaces for the office use shall be clearly marked.
Case Number � �G �36
o C,
Fee Paid - -__-_-__-
Date Filed _ G__--_
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location or Property: __� �'_-��-_��/_�/1�1][sr- ----------
Legal Description of PPrroperty-------------------------------------____
Owner. game __ . �. _ -----.------------------_-___--_--
Address--_LLB��`�
Applicant (ii other thcn owner); Name _--______________________________
Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request.- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plct
Special Use Permit __- Approval or Final. Plat
_Variance ___ Other --------------------
Description of Request:-------
L�-______________---------------
Signature
of A olicant: �'r=wr•j��
Applicant: r -
Date of Public Nearing: --------------------- -------------- ---
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back d
tached, showing the following:
�e
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set-bac'-s. _
d. Dimensions of proposed structure. r-
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. s
7. Other iniorrnation as may be requested.
Approved __- Denied ___ by the*Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
sublet: to the following conditions: -____________________________-_--_--
Approved ___ Denied _-_ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
following con iions:------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other side)
Z� r,
751
/ 77,
f
Cf/ ,e O1� .
��-
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-28
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: 801 West Pine Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Residential
Zoning District: R-B, Residential Duplex
Applicant's Name: Ingrid and James B. Lund
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description:
Subdivide a 32,640 square foot lot into two lots of 22,680 square feet and
9,960 square feet with a variance to the lot depth requirement. 100 feet
required, 83 feet proposed.
Discussion•
The request is to subdivide a lot of 32,640 square feet (272 feet x 120 feet)
into two lots. One lot 189x120 square feet, the other lot 83 x 120 square
feet. The request meets the lot area and lot width requirements for the R-B
District, 7,500 square feet minimum area and 50 foot minimum width but does
not meet the lot depth, 83 feet proposed, 100 feet required. A reason for the
shorter depth request is the location of an existing older two stall garage
that services the residence. The garage is old and in need of repair. Also,
older pine trees border the lot at the 83 foot plus depth. These trees would
be in the rearyard setback area of the new lots.
Adjacent land uses would not be adversely affected by the smaller lot depth.
Lots on the block have been split at various depths.
In a related case, the prospective purchaser of the new lot is requesting a 15
foot variance to the frontyard setback requirements to develop the site. See
Case No. V/90-37.
The lot depth requirements could be met by relocating or reconstructing the
existing garage closer to Pine Street.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
1. The garage shall be repaired and painted to improve its appearance.
0 5 vlgq - z
5 LL
7S
7S
!
93z9
�� o
9.3z-9
z300
9320
zz
29329y3z9
S3 9
93
2200
205
0
8
7
b
S 4
3
2
c
t
t
820
8�8
JC�
v /0i`''
g
D�So �i
71.
J
1G
Se
7S'
75
.......
_ - --.-- -
WA reQ
`►-ygr,V
PINE
8z/
S/ 7
2400
/O 3S-6'
2500
/0:365
z 3 �o
4
/ 0 3 8 .�
O.
si
r
717
/03es ' /63e�6- 1
z zoS zzso
ors,
G „ W-4 r£4 M.41N ifl.e.,v
NU AQD
'AC 100
Case Number
Fee Paid 60 ___--_—___
1
Dave Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property: __8II West Pine_______
Legal Description of Property: .. Lot 3—in Lull's Addition to Stillwater
owner• Ncme __Ingrid S.—and James —B; Lund---- Y-------------------
1956
Address __801 WestPine
---- __ Phone:----439---- --
Applicant (if other than owiner): Name ----------------------------------
Address -----------------—_____ Phone:_______________
Type of Request:* ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plot
_-_ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat
_X Variance ___ Other --------------------
Description of Request: Southerly Portion of Lot_3 from —line drawn parallel to
Willard Street 6 feet south of garage and extending Southerly therefrom to Willard Street.
Signature of Applicant: __
Date of Public Hearing: ____________-__
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back o-6 this or at-
tached, showing the following:
a
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. c�ci
3. Dimensions of iron, and side set -backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.?
5. Street names.
t.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ___---
subject to the following conditions: _—__________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject. to the
following conditions: ------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other side)
to Sr- (t 1 e
Cb,.M,* 1 e%r 7
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-37
Planning Commission Meeting: June 11, 1990
Project Location: Portion of lot at 801 West Pine Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Residential
Zoning District: R-B
Applicant's Name: James B . Lund
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description:
Request for ti teen foot frontyard setback.
Discussion:
The request is contingent on approval of Case No. V/90-28. The request is to
build a new house on the proposed 83 foot by 120 foot 9,960 square lot with a
fifteen foot rather than the required thirty foot frontyard setback. A reason
for needing the variance is lack of lot depth which is caused by the lot size.
The lot slopes up from Willard Street and the slope of the driveway over the
shorter setback distance is of concern should the variance be approved. There
are several mature Maple and Pine trees on the lot. It is recommended that as
many large trees as possible be preserved to buffer and screen the new house
from the neighbors and maintain the neighborhood character.
Because of the sloped frontyard and driveway length necessary to park a car on
private property, a minimum of twenty feet frontyard setback is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval.
CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
1. The minimum frontyard setback should be twenty feet from the front
property line.
2. The site plan for the building permit shall located existing treese and
show which trees will be left on the site.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Application Form
- Site Plans
IAC 100
Case Number��
Pee Paid ---------
Date Piled
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property: - _--w__.—.______—____—_____
Legal Description of Property:
Owner: Name ►'L.rj_------------
Address _ _y_v_ IA e_--------- Phone: _ -41 _1��-�---
Applicant (if other than owner); Name ---------------------------------
Address__-- ------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat
_If Variance __,� Other _
Description of Request: _CU�' Lc_� ��J�1�✓_l1�-� -�Q✓� h E_ ��arf4,1_--
_ I/vV FiJ1�r�__�_ ��,�zr,,� n
---- __ _ _ _ _ _ � glvac?� - yowl J1-------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Applicant:
Ci
Date of Public Hearin
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back of t`iis foran or at-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on ___w_______ (date)
subject to the following conditions: __________________________-_________
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
following conditions: -___________________-
Comments: (Use other side)
` •„ 01
M
� ,ca•7l,2
i
1
t
1
NEW
NORM
�.■gee = = ■■ww
1 ■a■w� = ■ ummul own=
■■ww, ■�-■w■■wi -�- ■■w■i -- --� ■■w■ —
�_ ■�■■_ �_ ■■WII� �■ = ����1_ = ii� irk_ = N�
C �■mow � � � � ^ ■r.� � � �� ■� � • � ����� �,
WIN
1�
1 � ■�■ems � / w ■v.i� � ■�O ~ � � '■A®■ = � � "ice � /
Wm
OWN
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
i I d (0 ter
06��
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JUNE 7, 1990
SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR THE STILLWATER
INDUSTRIAL PARK.
DISCUSSION:
OOn February 6, 1990, the City Council amended the Comprehensive Plan by
adopting the West Stillwater Business Park Plan. This plan was compiled after
seven months of study under the direction of the West Business Park Steering
Committee. As a goal of the plan, specific land use recommendations were
established. Zoning Text and Zoning Map Amendments were identified to reflect
this land use plan.
On June 11, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed these Zoning Map and Zoning
Text Amendments, then directed Staff to set a public hearing date for the next
regular Planning Commission meeting.
The six cases, (ZAT/90-2, ZAM/90-2, ZAT/90-3, ZAM/90-3, ZAT/90-4 and ZAM/9u-4)
before the Planning Commission are the Zoning Amendments for not only the West
Business Park but all commercial and industrial lands east of Greeley Street
and the Frontage Road east of Oasis (Forest Ridge).
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve each Zoning Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment with
recommendation to the City Council.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING
IP-I INDUSTRIAL PARK INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT
1. Chapter 31.01, Subdivision 22 entitled IP-I Industrial Park Industrial
District is rescinded and is hereafter enacted bo read as rol ows:
Subdivision 22 entitled Business Park Industrial District.
(1) PURPOSE: To provide a district for light industrial and office uses.
(2) PERMITTED USES:
The ollowing are permitted uses:
(a) Limited manufacturing conducting a process, fabrication, storage or
manufacturing light materials including electronic components and
accessories.
(b) Automotive painting, upholstering, tire recapping and major repair
when conducted completely in an enclosed building.
(c) Research laboratories.
(d) Business, professional and medical office services.
(e) Finance, insurance and real estate office services.
(3) SPECIAL PERMITTED USES:
The ollowing uses are permitted by Special Use Permit:
(a) Radio and television facilities.
(b) Printing, publishing and allied industries.
(c) General warehousing and outside storage.
(d) Outside storage (must be screened).
(e) Mini -storage.
(f) Wholesale trade.
(g) Commercial nurseries.
(h) Retail sales of products manufactured on site so long as no more than
twenty percent of building floor area is for retail purposes.
(i) Cultural or governmental facilities (movie theatres, libraries, fire
stations).
(4) USE DETERMINATION:
R Special Use Permit may be required when any other use or service
establishment determined by the Planning Commission to be the same
general character as the foregoing uses and which will not impair the
present or potential use of adjacent properties may be permitted.
(5) GENERAL REGULATIONS:
(a) Height of buildings:
- Maximum 40 feet
(b) Minimum lot area 1 acre
(c) Setbacks:
- Front 40 feet
- Rear 30 feet
- Side 20 feet
- Abutting Residential District 75 feet
(d) - Lot coverage 60%
- Landscaped Area 20% of lot area.
- Front and sideyard setbacks small be landscaped.
Adopted by Council this day of
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Publish:
1990.
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
SECTION 31.01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED
ZONING/ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, does ordain
that the Zoning Map is amended as indicated on the attached map
marked "Exhibit A".
Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council:
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk
Publish:
a
� • ''� • � - '3nr _ ntl3153r�nArsfl.t � ,
Vf �
F
j I
a f
xi
�I
W v
� O
o
s
I ! 1 1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING
IP-C INDUSTRIAL PARK
COMMERCIAL ONE ZONING DISTRICT
1. Chapter 31.01, Subdivision 19 entitled IP-C1 Industrial Park Commercial
One District is rescinded and is hereafter enacted to read as o ows:
Subdivision 19 entitled Business Park Office District.
(1) PURPOSE: To provide a district for office uses.
(2) PERMITTED USES:
Tne following are permitted uses:
(a) Business, professional and medical office services.
(b) Finance, insurance and real estate office services.
(c) Research facilities.
(3) SPECIAL PERMITTED USES:
Tne following uses are permitted by Special Use Permit.
(a) Governmental and educational institutions.
(b) Day Care facilities, including preschool.
(c) Wholesale trade.
(d) Retail - general merchandise.
(e) Eating and drinking places and cafes.
M Cultural facililties (theatres, libraries, museums, art galleries,
etc.)
(g) Warehousing and inside storage.
(4) USE DETERMINATION:
A Special Use Permit may be required when any other use or service
establishment determined by the Planning Commission to be the same
general character as the foregoing uses and which will not impair the
present or potential use of adjacent properties may be permitted.
(5) GENERAL REGULATIONS:
(a) Height of buildings - maximum 40 feet
(b) Minimum lot area - 1 acre
(c) Setbacks:
- Front 40 feet
- Rear 30 feet
- Side 20 feet
- Abutting residential district 75 feet
- Lot coverage 60%
(d) Landscaping:
- Area minimum 20% of lot area
- Front and sideyard setbacks shall be landscaped.
Adopted by Council this day of
CITY CLERK
Publish:
1990.
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANICE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
SECTION 31.01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED
ZONING/ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, does ordain
that the Zoning Map is amended as indicated on the attached map
marked "Exhibit A".
Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council:
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk
Publish:
W
z
0
�a
�a
H
U
N
Dq
W
Z
O
H
H_
U�
W
t�H
U
00
H
H
a
a
a
VJ
aH
pHp��
E
E-a
W
z
H
H
W
z
W
Lo
a
a
4
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
SECTION 31.01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED
ZONING/ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
Section 1: The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, does ordain
that the Zoning Map is amended as indicated on the attached map
marked "Exhibit A".
Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council:
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk
Publish:
M7mTmh
;14 It.
1-4
7z 117'.7
CD
ccc
r-4
•ram ` - M' -•�; r l f.r s � � 1
o
L)
0
P4
P
114
114
P4
Lo
V)
to
z
tn
AWE
V)
0
P4
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING
IP-C ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA DOES
ORDAIN:
1. Chapter 31.01, Subdivision 18 entitled IP-C Industrial Park Commercial
District is rescinded and is hereafter enacted to read as fof ows.
Subdivision 18 entitled Business Park Commercial District.
(1) PURPOSE: To provide a district for general community commercial and
o t� cuses.
(2) PERMITTED USES:
The following are permitted uses:
(a) Wholesale trade.
(b) Retail - general merchandise.
(c) Specialty retail.
(d) Food - retail.
(e) Eating and drinking places and cafes.
(f) Finance, insurance and real estate office services.
(g) Personal services (dry cleaning, beauty salons, etc.)
(h) Business, professional and medical office services.
(i) Fast food outlets.
(3) SPECIAL PERMITTED USES:
The ollow-ng uses are permitted by Special Use Permit.
(a) Retail trade not previously specified.
(b) Cultural facilities (movie theatres, libraries, art galleries,
theatres).
(c) Auto repair and related services.
(d) Day care facilities, including preschools.
(e) Hotel/Motels.
(f) Outside sales areas.
(g) Drive through business.
(h) Commercial nurseries.
(4) USE DETERMINATION:
A Special Use Permit may be required when any other use or service
establishment determined by the Planning commission to be the same
general character as the foregoing uses and which will not impair the
present or potential use of adjacent properties may be permitted.
1
(5) GENERAL REGULATIONS:
(a)
Height of buildings - maximum
40
feet
(b)
Minimum lot area -
1/2
acre
(c)
Setbacks:
- Front
40
feet
- Rear
30
feet
- Side
20
feet
- Abutting residential district 75
feet
(d)
Landscaping
- Area minimum
20% of lot area
- Front and Sideyard setbacks
shall
be landscaped.
Adopted
by Council this day of
,
1990.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Publish:
MAYOR