HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-05-09 CPC Packett�
ar
THE BIBTNPLACE OF MINNESO1A
May 9, 1990
THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, MAY 14, 1990 AT 7:00
P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NHI3 uUR HSTREET.
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes - April 9, 1990.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. CASE NO. DR/90-2 - A Design Permit for upgrading an existing storefront at
202 South ain treet in the CBD, Central Business District, Local Historic
District. Katie Holdorph, County Classics, Applicant.
2. CASE NO. SUB/90-22 - A minor subdivision of a 32,005 square foot lot (Lots
a-nd 3, Peterson's Addition) into two lots of 10,000 square feet (Lot
7 ) and 22,005 square feet ( Lots 2 and 3) at 1911 West Pine Street in -the
RA, Single Family Residential District. Dorothy Gerson, Applicant.
3. CASE NO. SUB/90-23 - A major subdivision of three lots consisting of
21,750, , and 43,500 square feet into four lots, all of which will
consist of 21,750 square feet on Poplar Street between North Fifth Street
and North Everett Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Larry Dauffenbach, Applicant.
4. CASE NO. SUP/90-24 - A Special Use Permit to construct a 31,086 square foot
Auto _ervice an Retail Service Mall on the Northeast corner of Tuenge
Drive and 60th Street North in the IP-C Industrial Park -Commercial
District. Marco Construction, Applicant.
5. CASE NO. SUP/90-25 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a five bedroom Bed and
Breakfast -establishment at 319 West Pine Street in the RCM, Multi -Family
Residential District. Bruce and Vikki Brillhart, Applicants.
6. CASE NO. SUP/90-26 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a temporary food
vending business out of a popcorn wagon East of the Commander Elevator on
private property along Nelson Street in the CBD, Central Business District.
Kenneth Duneman, Applicant.
7. CASE NO. ANNEX/90-1 - An annexation petition to the City of Stillwater for
an 88.5 acre parcel of property (Benson Farm) located North of Orleans
Street between Greeley Street -and Washington Avenue, currently in
Stillwater Township. Jeffrey D. Benson, representing the Gilbert Benson
Estate and Steve C. Fiterman, Ground Properties, Petitioners.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
May 14, 1990
8. CASE NO. CPA/90-1 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment by adding 88.5 acres of
land, located North of Orleans Street between Greeley Street and Washington
Avenue, to the Comprehensive Plan Boundary and designate such land Single
Family Residential. Ground Development, Applicant.
9. CASE NO. ZAM/90-1 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment designating 88.5 acres
of land RA, Single Family Residential, 10,000 square feet/D.U. The property
is located North of Orleans Street between Greeley Street and Washington
Avenue. Ground Development, Applicant.
OTHER BUSINESS:
ZAM and ZAT - Zoning Map and Zoning Text Amendment for the Business Park
(formerly the Industrial Park) District (including IP-C, IP-C1 and IP-I).
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
DATE: AP R I L 09, 1990
TIME: 7:00 PIyI
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman
Glenna Pealka Warren Pakulsi
Don Valsvik Angela Anderson
Judy Curtis Duane Elliott
Jay Kimble
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
MEMBERS ABSENT: Rabb Hamlin,
The meeting was called to order by Don Valsvik.
APPROVAL 01= MINUTES
-------------------
Mot ion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Judy Curtis to approve the
minutes of the meeting of March 12, 1990, subject to the following
corrections:
1. Judy Curtis was present at the March 12, 1990 meeting.
2. Case No. V/90-15 previously omitted Don Valsvik as opposed to
the motion to the variance to the parking ordinance for expansion
of a restaurant tak-out business at 626 South Fourth Street.
All in favor.
PUBLIC HEAF2I NGS
---------------
CASE NO. DR/90-2-Design Review Permit for the renovation of a
storefront at Sherburn' s Jewelry store at 210 South Main Street in
the CDD, Central Business District. Sherburne's Jewelry, Applicant.
Discussion followed on the proposed location, size, and construction
materials for the storefront. Members reviewed proposed design and
suggested approval of the general plans as presented and recOmmended
review by the City Council due to the location in the downtown
Historic District.
Applicant's concerns surround security, maintainence, and visual
display. Applicant is willing to adapt the type of materials used in
the construction.
Motion to by Jay Kinble, approve the general plans a presented,
subject to City Council review and comments by the Design Review
Committee. Seconded by Warren Pakulski. Unanimously approved.
CASE NO. SUP/90-17-Special Use Permit to conduct small group tours,
small business meetings, ans small weddings at the William Sauntry
Bed and Breakfast, 626 North Fourth Street, in the RD, Two Family
Residential District. Duane and Marth Hubbs, Applicants.
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSSION
04/Q9/90
Applicants would like to expand the business to allow for small
weddings (E5-30 people) , small group tours, and small business
meetings. Conditions for tha special events was discussed by
members.
One audience member, Dean Miller, expressed disapproval, due to
the fact that the overnight Bed & Breakfast would be changed to a
small business in a residential district.
Discussion followed on the parking facilities and the improvement
due to the renovation in the neighborhood.
Motion to approve, subject to the following conditions:
1. A Maximum of six special events (large functions defined as
bridal and wedding showers, anniversaries, weddings and wedding
receptions, and church functions, inclusive of trolley tours) over
twenty persons would be allowed each month.
2. All special event visitors shall park on site or on the
residential side of the street.
3. Limit of groups: 50 capacity as approved unless approval is
obtained from the City Council.
4. Food must be served by a licensed caterer.
5. A 1 1 special events shall be over by 9: 00 P.M.
E. No open bar on premises for special events. Champagne on a two
person/one bottle limit.
7. Eliminated.
8. No outside entertainment or lighting for special events is
allowed.
9. No persons to leave the premises of the Inn with alcohol.
10. No live entertainment or loud reproduced music.
11. Innkeepers must be present and visible at all special events.
12. This permit shall be reviewed one year from this approval
(April 1, 1990) or upon complaint.
Motion to approve by Judy Curtis, seconded by Duane Elliott. Dori
Valsvi k opposed. Approved.
CASE NO. V/90-19-Variance to the frontyard setback requirements
(twenty five feet requested, thirty feet required) for the
construction of a garage addition at 1124 Parkwood Lane in the RA,
Single Family Residential District. Dave Widmyer, Applicant.
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
04/09/90
Applicant discussed the existing location of the house and the
planned addition to the garage. No audience discussion.
Motion to approve an 8 ' variance by Duane Elliott, seconded by
Angela Anderson. Unanimously approved.
CASE NO. SV/90-21-Request to vacate a portion of South Holcombe
Street, between Ramsey and Myrtle Streets n the RED, Two Family
Residential District. Ande and Muriel Haszis, Applicants.
Discussion followed on the right-of-way, the water main, and the
fire hydrant location. Applicant requests the vacation to satisfy
the requirements of the mortgage company.
Motion to approve by Jay Kimble, subject to the coordination by
the applicant with the City Attorney, Dave Magnuson, and presentment
to the City Council for approval. Seconded by Judy Curtis. Unanimous.
DOWNTOWN CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT
Steve Russell, Community Development Director, presented t h e
Downtown Capital Facilities Project to members in the form of a
slide -show. Discussion followed on the general concepts involved
with each planned Phase.
A public hearing will be held on April 12, 1990, and the
presentation will be presented to the City Council.
Motion to approve by Judy Curtis, seconded by Gerald Fontaine.
Unanimously approved.
Motion to adjourn at 9 : 15 by Gerald Fontaine, seconded by Duane
Elliott. All in favor.
EOR YOUR INFORMATION
DESIGN REVIEW
CASE NO. DR/90-3
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting: May 7, 1990
Project Location: 202 South Main Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: Katie Holdorph
Type of Application: Design Review Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The request is to upgrade an existing storefront. The project consists of
painting an existing storefront which faces Chestnut Street and Main Street.
DISCUSSION:
Country Classics recently moved into the building at 202 South Main Street.
This corner is one of the most visible buildings in Downtown Stillwater, due
to the fact it is on the Southwest corner of Main and Chestnut Streets. This
property is also a contributing property in the local Historic District.
According to the Historic Preservation Commission, Ordinance No. 22.10 (Color
of buildings) shall be reviewed as part of the Design Permit Process. Tnis was
included in order to preserve the character of the historic buildings by
defining the spectrum of colors which are appropriate to the era of the
majority of the buildings in Downtown. This era being the Victorian Era of the
1890's-1910.
The color chosen for this project is a Victorian blue. The applicant has
stated that this color would help define the entrance to the structure and
coordinate well with the brick. The applicant is aware of the color spectrum
of the Victorian Era and was very sensitive in choosing this color.
DESIGN REVIEW/HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Design Review Committee approved this color scheme or the facade of this
building. It is consistent with the design guidelines and preservation of
the local Commercial Historic District.
FINDINGS:
This Victorian color is very appropriate to the historic integrity of Downtown
Stillwater, especially Main Street.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/90-22
Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990
Project Location: 1911 West Pine Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Dorothy Gerson
Type of Application: Minor Subdivision
PROJECT LOCATION:
Fl minor subbrzvision of 32,005 square feet into two lots of 10,000 square feet
and 22,005 square feet at 1911 West Pine Street.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to subdivide a large lot under one parcel number (previously
three lots) into two lots. The size plan identifies Lot 7 as 1911 West Pine
Street and Lots 2 and 3 facing South Oakes Streets. The applicant has stated
she would like to sell the home at 1911 West Pine Street and retain lots 2 and
3 on West Oakes Street for sale at a later date. West Oak Street is not
improved and no utilities are directly available to the site. The lots 2 and 3
portion of the existing lot meets the 20,000 lot requirements for an unsewered
lot. Before Lots 2 and 3 could be developed, services would have to be
provided to the site by the owner.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
April 12, 1990
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
STILLWATER, MN. 55082
October, 1976 I purchased a home at 1911 West Pine Street, namely Lot 7,
Peterson's Addition, Parcel No. 10755-2300.
On March 1981 I purchased two adjoining lots prior to their going tax
forfeit which are Lots 2 and 3 Peterson's Addition (At that time they
were indicated as Parcel No. 10755-2050 and Parcel No. 10755-2100).
Following my retirement in 1983 I made application for the Minnesota
Tax Credit and they would only allow this credit on Lot 7, so at the
suggestion of Washington County they combined the three parcels under
one property number, namely 10755-2300.
I am proposing to sell Lot 7 where my home is located but I want to
retain the adjoining two vacant lots for sale at a future date. In
order to accomplish this I am informed that I must make application to
split off these two lots.
My request at this time is to split off these two lots as one parcel.
'AC 100
Case Number Stl� ' 2�
aG
Fee Paid
❑ate Filed
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
1911 West Pine St.
Street Location of Property: ----
Legal Do*scription of Property: _Lots 2_,_ 3_2nd 7_Peterson's Addition__ ----- -2300)
Dorothy R. Gerson
Owner.Name --------------------- .--------------------------------
St.
Address -------
West Oak--------------- Phone: -- ---- - -----
Applicant (if other than owner): Name ---------------------------------
Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Request:' ___ Rezoning ___ ApprovaI of Preliminary Plat
Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Pia;
___ Variance _K Other - Subdivision _-____
Description of Request: ___ See attached memo--------_-_----..___-_____
Signature of Applicant.
Date of Public Hearing: ___---__-________-_--__-----------....._-__-____
NOTE. Sketch. of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n 'pack of this ior.-n or at-
tached, showing the ;ollowing:
1. North direction. �'Le� /1�
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. r ` ';• .
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. tom` 1�caD
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. -
5. Street nanes. � o Lw�,T R 3
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. co LyYATYI �
7. Other information as may be requested.,) 5
yV
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on __�� (4cl*ate)
subject to the following conditions: ___-________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ---------------- subject to the
following conditions: _________________-_-_-_--- _-._._______--- ---_
Comments. (Use other side)
' ' 1
I
!
60
s r
a
a 73. 2.Z m 73. 2 Z' O
'°• pb •°, �o /00. 00 '
'tp
°
° o
0
° O
Q
\0-
.00 , O
l
o
m
NI r' 1
� •O
w
O
i
O
\ + /00.00'
%.Q } ,
o °
0
°
o
pb o
pb a
0•
s
Otl.oO'
/V0
° So.
0.���'S ST.eE�'T
a
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/90-23
Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990
Project Location: On Poplar Street between North Fifth Street and North
Everett Street.
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Larry Dauffenbach'
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A major subdivision of three lots consisting of 21,750, 21,750 and 43,500
square feet into four lots, all of which will consist of approximately 21,750
square feet.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to subdivide three lots into four lots as shown on the attached
site plan. The three lots presently do not have City water or sewer
connections due to the fact that there is no water or sewer extension to this
area of North Stillwater. The City requires that in order to have on -site
system, a lot must be 20,000 square feet. These 21,750 square foot lots meet
this minimum requirement.
The City Engineer reviewed the proposed subdivision with the applicant on May
3, 1990. It was concluded that no development should occur on the eastern edge
of Lot 4 in order to allow the drainage ditch that is presently located on
that lot from the drainage on the south side of Poplar Street could continue
to traverse in the same location. It was also suggested that a swale be
constructed closer to the edge of the Schell property so the drainage could be
diverted away from their drainfield. Lot 3 should be graded as to drain across
the northerly edge of Lot 4 in order to take advantage of the swale area.
The City Engineer also suggests that drainage should be maintained between
Lots 1 and 2 so that it would enter an existing storm water drainpipe behind
Larry Dauffenbach's house.
The applicant has submitted perk tests 'For each lot. They have been reviewed
and determined to be adequate.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The Subdivider shall submit a drainage plan that snows how existing and
increased runoff due to development can be accommodated without adversely
affeting properties between the site and Willow Street (see attached SEH
report. Drainage easements shall be provided as required.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed land division is consistent with the use and lot size require-
ments of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Existing condition site plan.
- Proposed subdivision.
- Engineer's report.
13AC 1GO
Case Number-S�,1/1�_,,�,3_
Fee Paid _ D_ _______
a �.
Date Filed _
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORA -
Street Location of Property: ___ 1824_N_ 5th St_ Stillwater Minn
-------------------------
Legal Description of Property: ____See Attached Sheet-----------------------
Owner: Name ___Botat�L9.f_catherine Peterson
Address ------------------------------ Phone ----------------
Applicant
Type
1L_1gLs'with _access_to-,_Poplar St________________^_rry
Signature of A ol• ------
-_-___
� f
Date of Public Hearing:-________-_____�------
___.�___________________
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on back of this form or at-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction. 3k 4 5
s
2. Location of proposed structure on lot.
} 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. r"l '( 1990
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.`
5. Street names. ��
6. Location of adjacent existing buiTciinjs. ' � ', CITY OF STaf i�'1�i,
STILLWA[TER ti
7. Other information as may be requested. TT s
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho'Planning Commission on --------- (date)
subject to the following conditions: ___-____-;______-___________--____-_
------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
following conditions: -------------------------------------------------
- ----- ------- ----- ----------------------------------- ----- -----
Comments. (Use other side),
Ad�SK54Efl
ENGINEERS lI ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS
May 8, 1990
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA SS 17 0 612490-2000
Mr. Steve Russell,
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
MINOR SUBDIVISION ON
WEST POPLAR STREET
PLANNING CASE REVIEW
As you requested, we have reviewed the proposed lot split of
three lots into four lots on West Poplar Street between North 5th
Street and North Everett Street. Our review consisted of walking
the site and adjoining properties with the applicant to review
grading requirements and existing drainage and the effect of the
proposed lot split and development on the existing drainage.
It appears that minimal grading will be required as a part of the
proposed development. There is a high point at approximately the
center of the area to be developed. From this high point the
flow on Poplar Street is easterly to an existing culvert near
North 5th Street. The flow in the westerly direction on Poplar
Street terminates at an existing low area on the lot line between
the two proposed westerly lots to be developed. The flow at this
low point is overland to an existing culvert in the back yard of
property owned by the developer just north of proposed Lots 1 and
2. The property owner states that he has never experienced
flooding in this existing culvert. This appears to be a 12" VCP
which runs in a northeasterly direction across the access
easement (Willow Street) to this property, which then outlets
into an improved ditch thence northerly to Hazel Street and then
overland into the ravine in Browns Creek.
I have calculated the existing runoff for the existing
conditions, with limited development to be 2.85 cfs. We have
calculated the additional runoff from two developed lots, that is
two houses with a roof area estimated at 24 feet by 50 feet, and
a paved driveway for each lot estimated at 30 feet by 12 feet,
runoff to be 0.6 cfs for each house or a total of 1.2 cfs for
both lots. We have calculated the total runoff at the culvert on
SHORT ELLIOTT ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS,
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN
Mr. Steve Russell
May 8, 1990
Page #2
the parcel north of the proposed Lots 1 and 2 to be 4.1 cfs. We
have calculated the capacity of the existing 12" VCP which
crosses Willow Street in approximately a northeasterly direction
outletting into an improved ditch to be 10.7 cfs.
We have calculated the runoff from Lots 3 and 4 in the same
manner with the same assumptions as the calculation for Lots 1
and 2. We have calculated the runoff from the golf course to be
5.5 cfs and with the addition of the improved lots for the roof
area and driveway at 1.2 cfs total, the total runoff on the west
side of North 5th Street to North Willow Street where it enters a
culvert and crosses under is 6.7 cfs. We have calculated the
capacity of the culvert under West Willow Street to be 17 cfs.
The developer should maintain drainage between Lots 1 and 2 so
that it would enter the existing 12" VCP behind the existing
house north of Lots 1 and 2. The developer indicated that there
had been no flooding problem with this culvert even in the spring
when it could be frozen.
If the easterly edge of Lot 4 adjacent to North 5th Street were
to remain relatively undeveloped, the drainage ditch that is
presently located on that lot from the drainage on the south side
of Poplar Street could continue to traverse in the same location.
However, once the drainage reaches the parcel north of Lot 4
which is noted on the developer's proposed subdivision map as
property owned by Schell, a swale should be constructed closer to
the easterly edge of the Schell property and diverted away from
their drainfield. The swale would then be on the easterly edge
of the drainfield and outlet into the 15" culvert crossing under
Willow Street. The culvert crossing under Willow Street at this
point needs to be cleaned out. When the swale on the edge of the
Schell property were excavated, a larger depression area could be
provided at the inlet end of the culvert such that it would
provide slight pooling effect and perhaps assist in keeping the
culvert clean. Lot 3 would more than likely be graded to drain
across the northerly edge of Lot 4 and take advantage of the
above mentioned swale area.
All of the natural drainage appears to flow in a northerly
direction from Poplar Street to the ravine in Browns Creek. It
is not anticipated that four new homes constructed in the area
will add appreciably to the runoff presently experienced in this
area. Since the streets are not permanent streets constructed to
City standards with concrete curb and gutter, and there is no
storm sewer available, it is not practical at this time to
require storm sewer construction more extensively than to retain
Mr. Steve Russell
May 8, 1990
Page #3
the overland flow status to the existing culverts. However, the
developer should provide the City with a plan or sketch
indicating how he would direct drainage across property which he
does not own into existing culverts. The City may wish to
consider some type of an easement agreement between the developer
and other property owners affected by drainage. This type of an
agreement could be prepared and signatures obtained by the
developer holding the City harmless.
If there are any other questions, please contact me.
Sin- ely,
r �-
Richard E. Moore, P.E.
City Engineer
REM/cih
cc: Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator
i
BROWNS CREEK
�1
I
I — - � SCtH�L,E�NBURG� i�ARK � ; �• �, � I141411Vr.4 -IV
� !
I 5vVA4.E
H
a
J
W
I •
L�
f Rs R HTS DR
i
1
LANE DR
I-
I1
� 1
oe
i
—r—
i
�,L4Ej j L p W ASPEN 57
Z
v1
a
s
E ALDU ST
E HAZEL ST
E WILLOW ST
E POPLAR ST
E BALSAM ST
E SPRUCE ST
E JUNIPER 57
E SYCAMORE ST
E ST CROIX AVE
E STILLWATER AVE
s
E WILKIN ST
1
t - E ASPEN ST
J ..Pa
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON POPLAR STREET�°--
PREPARED BY S. E. H. ` III= 600
MAY 8th 1990 b
CITY OF STILLWATER
FILE 89114 CITY ENGINEER
`p�E` S-
i
F
1pN o(y
v�
V '
Q
2
9
CL44
-
-
0
l
V
Y
i
m
s
a
T Q
^`--
0 3
a 1
IL
r
J
O
OQ
J
�1
IL
a
�1
I
�
7
Cl
t—
w
Q
J
�
r
T
�
9
Ca
5
C°
I
in N" IV m0'
i
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/90-24
Planning Commission Meeting: May 15, 1990
Project Location: Northeast corner Highway 36 Frontage Road and Tuenge Drive
Comprehensive Plan District: Industrial Park
Zoning District: IP-C Industrial
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Special Use Permit for 31,086 square foot multi use auto service center and
commercial retail uses.
DISCUSSION:
Tff& pa p ication is for a two building auto service center. The site is located
along the Highway 36 Frontage Road in the Brick Pond Special Plan Area. (See
attached Land Use Map.) Building "A" contains 17,836 square feet and houses
convenience stores on the North end closest to the residential area. Building
"B" has 13,250 square feet and contains auto service related uses. The
building sits on a 3.32 acre site. The proposed development site is a part of
a larger parcel of land that runs to the North to 61st Street (currently being
constructed). A storm sewer easement divides the two portions of the lot. A
minor land division spliting the lot is required as a condition of approval.
Lands to the North and West are currently zoned R-B Residential. An Evergreen
Tree vegetative buffer and six foot wooden fence is required to reduce the
visual impact and soften the appearance of the commercial use from the
residential area.
The building meets the setback, lot coverage and parking requirements with the
exception of Building "A:" setback from Tuenge Drive. Thirty five feet is
proposed, forty feet is required.
The landscape plan shows street trees located along the Frontage Road and
Tuenge Drive as required. Sod or seeding is provided in other perimeter
landscaped areas. It is recommended to improve the appearance of the
development, the landscape plan be modified to provide a 2 1/2 foot to 3 foot
berm around the street sides of the site and all grassy areas be sodded or an
irrigation system installed to ensure the growth of the seeded areas. Steeply
sloped disturbed area located in the Northeast corner of the site should be
sodded to control erosion. A guard rail shall be installed along the paved
areas to protect cars from the steeply sloped area. A trash enclosure is
provided at the Northeast corner of the site. This may be inconvenient for
some businesses. A condition of approval requires that all trash receptacles
shall be screened by a structure of similar rock face block materials as the
building. No mechanical equipment is shown on the building elevations. All
mechanical equipment shall be screened by approved landscaping or located so
not to be conspicuous from public view. It is recommended additional
landscaping be planted in front of the two buildings facing the Frontage Road.
As required by City policy, all landscaping shall be installed, or if not
practical, bonded for before building occupancy.
The site plan shows storm water running off to the Northwest corner of this
site. This can be accommodated by the existing storm sewer line that runs
along the back of the property. The Fire Department requires two way access
lanes to be 24 foot minimum. The travel lane in front of Building "B" shows a
20 foot travel lane and the driveway width next to the trash enclosure may not
be 24 feet.
No lighting plan was submitted with the application. A lighting plan is
required that directs light down or toward the buildings and away from streets
and residential areas.
No elevations or sign plan is provided for Building "B". The elevations for
Building "A" show the metal facia roof ending at the'North and South corners
of the building. The West elevation which will not have the facia will be
prominent from Tuenge Drive and vehicles traveling Eastbound on the Frontage
Road. This side of the building is in effect, the front of the building and
should be treated accordingly. The building facia should be continued around
the entire building for Building "A" and "B" and additional building
architectural detail added to that side of the building, possibly through use
of color and/or block detailing.
The Signage Plan is shown on the site plan and typical building elevations
for Building "A". The Sign Ordinance allows one sign per business with a
maximum sign area of one square foot of signage per building frontage. Because
of the building design, it is recommended to allow one square foot per
frontage of lease held space with a maximum of two foot letters. No signage is
shown on the Tuenge Drive or the East side of Building "B". A 192 square foot,
free standing sign is located in a driveway landscaped median . The maximum
permitted size for this type if sign is 100 square feet. It is recommended
that the free-standing sign be limited to 25 feet heighth similar to other
signs in the area and be a center identification sign with no tenant
advertising (one sign per tenant is permitted). The steel pipe base to the
free-standing sign shall be clad with block to match the building material or
redesigned in some way to complement the design of the building.
The plans have been referred to the City Engineer for comments. Comments from
those agencies should be contained in conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned.
FINDINGS:
As co��fioned, the proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the
general purpose of this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. A Certificate of Survey shall be prepared by the developer and approved
by the City before building permits are issued separating this site
from the parcel to the North.
2. The landscape plan shall be modified to include:
A. A six foot fence along the North property boundary;
B. An Evergreen Tree screen planted (thirty foot on center) to
visually screen the commercial area from the residential area.
C. Grass 2.5 to 3 foot screening berm around the Frontage Road side
and Tuenge Drive side of the site.
D. Sod in all area shown as grass.
E. Shrubs on bushes planted in front of the buildings along the
Frontage Road.
F. All mechanical equipment shall be screened by a opaque structure
or landscaping.
G. All landscaping shall be installed before building occupancy.
H. The landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy condition
as shown on the final plans or this permit may be voided.
3. An auto guard rail shall be constructed along the curb in the Northeast
area next to the steeply sloped site.
4. Building "A" shall be setback 40 feet from the west property line along
Tuenge Drive.
5. The trash enclosure shown on the plan shall be constructed of the same
material as the wall of the building.
6. All trash receptacles shall be contained in the proposed structure
located in the northeast corner of the site or concealed in the
business building. There shall be no trash receptacles along Tuenge
Drive to the rear of Building "A".
7. A lighting plan shall be submitted that shows fixture location, height
and design. Lighting shall be directed at the building or down so the
lens of the light is not visible from the public streets or residential
areas. (No wallpacks).
8. All two-way travel lanes shall have a clear width of 24 feet.
9. The building facia for both buildings shall be continued around the
entire building and additional detailing added to the West elevation of
Building "A" along Tuenge Drive.
10. The sign plan shall be modified in the following ways:
A. Each lease held space shall have a wall sign with a maximum area
of one square foot of signage per building frontage or lease
held space. Maximum letter height shall be 24 inches.
3
B. There shall be no advertising signage on the West side of
Building "A" or the East side of Building "B".
C. The free-standing sign shall have a maximum height of 25 feet
and area of 100 square feet. The Auto Center name only shall be
placed on the sign.
D. The six foot steel post shall be clad with material similar to
the building materials or modified with a design complementary
to the site.
11. Comments from the City Engineer are incorporated as conditions of
project approval.
12. A driveway permit shall be obtained from MnDOT before building permits
are issued.
4
"AC 100
Case Number, 52Q= £
Fee Paid __ .+�-'_ &--d --
Date Filed _: l _3 —/
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property: ---__-
Legal Description of Property. __,SF�F+. ATTAC HF.n
Owner. Name Gusto Partners ________
Address -__ 2233 N_ Hamline_,_#125_ Phone: - -----
M rco Cgnstruction
Applicant (if other than owner): ame ___� ____________________________
Address 2233 N _ Hamline Ave. #125 Phone: _612_639- 0060
-------------------
Type of Request:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat
___ Variance _X_ Other _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Description of Request.- Auto_Mall_in IP-C_District
------------------------------
------------- �,�__ __w--------------
Signature of Applicant:-
C
Date of Public Hearing:
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back o 4..-n or at-
tached, showing the following: 1 2��; 56
1
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. ry"Ay 1990
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. :PAID
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
CITY 1,��
5. Street names. STiLav'ATER,
6. Location of adjacent e-xisting buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested. Y
Approved ___ Denied -__ by the'Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
subject to the following coriditions:-____-___..w_____---__-_________--___
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subject to the
,allowing conditions: ------------------------------------------------
--
S1H913H )IHVd NV0
mmmw+r-Ww wiry
4'
0 0)
z ,09
a m
w0
i
om j
LL
•N�.:
.: 1�� 4�,• •1 !� Al �,
n: _T•t-•fir 1 ?� -
�
LU
LLU
108
w
LL^.
L.
V
Z,i
w '..
Q
in
ww
C7.
Q in
1
rn
O) O
1 N
-;
L� 0 1v
y I Mcli
4
N
O
Z C
_
I• 1
Z
co
1 IcrLU gj M
,[ri I cm
W N
41
ts..
a
14,
^'rill F.
1 r Q
a z
m 00,
0
R
z
w
W
Lij
T
L
O
U
Y
LL
LL
M
M
o
V/
N
D
rn
0
Z
dIHSNM01 831VM-1'111S
831VM"1"1115 30 J 110
MO
to
9C\j
I
In
M 0
O N
LL7 N
O)
w
fn
O
cO
Q
O
w
Z
_Z
2
cr
w
I—
J
J
H,^
Cl)
w
Z
Q
J
0
w
U)
d
O
T-
CL
l
RIVER HEIGHTS AUTO MALL
Stillwater, Minnesota
This development consists of tenants associated with the
automobile industry plus certain, high volume, drive in
service establishments that cater to residential areas.
Specialists in the automobile industry that usually frequent
this type of development are:
Tire sales and installation
Tune up specialists
Auto Body repair and painting
Wholesale auto parts dealers
Muffler and brake installation
Radio sales and installation
Upholstery repair
Van conversions
General mechanics and engine repair
Parts overhaul
The maximum number of employees for these types of operations
are usually one person for each repair bay plus one for
general office assistance. Auto parts sales is usually two to
four employees including the delivery service. Auto body
repair will usually use one employee for two or three work
stations as the wait for parts to be delivered.
Drive in service business for the residential community
generally consist of;
Pizzerias
Dry Cleaners
Liquor stores
Two to four employees is normal for each business with
parking required adjacent to the main entry. Pizzerias
generally have their highest demand in the evenings after
normal businesses have closed and therefore do not have a
high impact on the parking requirements for the mall as a
whole.
z
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP190-25
Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990
Project Location: 319 West Pine Street
Comprehensive Plan District: RCM
Zoning District: Multi -family residential
Applicant's Name: Bruce and Vikki Brillhart
Type of Application: Special Use Permit (Bed and Breakfast)
Project Description:
A pecia Use Permit to conduct a five bedroom Bed and Breakfast
establishment.
Discussion:
The request is to conduct a five bedroom Bed and Breakfast establishment in
the Hersey Bean Home on the Southeast corner of Pine and Sixth Streets. This
home is extremely large. It has been an eight-plex since approximately 1960.
The applicants have stated that they plan to restore the house back to a
single family dwelling and provide three Bed and Breakfast rooms on the second
floor and two on the third floor. They also plan to submit the home to the
State Historical Society for National Register nomination.
The existing lot is quite large as shown by the attached site plan. The plan
also shows where off-street parking will be located on the property. This is
adequate for the proposed Bed and Breakfast use. The lot will also be
screened from the adjacent property to the south with a wood fence and a hedge
on the west. A sign plan has been submitted with this application along with
the sign location as shown on the site plan. This 3'75" sign meets the sign
provisions in the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance.
There was an initial concern about the distance of the home to another Bed and
Breakfast Inn, in this case the Rivertown Inn. According to the Ordinance,
another Bed and Breakfast Inn shall not be within three blocks of another. If
a typical block in the City is identified. Its approximate length is concluded
at 300 feet (six lots all 50 feet wide). It is determined that the distance
between Bed and Breakfast establishments must be approximately 900 feet. In
this case, the applicants have stated that the distance between this home and
the Rivertown Inn is 350 paces or 1,050 feet which is well over three typical
city blocks.
The report filed by the applicant states each provison in the Bed and Breakfast
Ordinance and how they will adhere to each provision.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CASE NO. SUP/90-25
1. The manager of the residence shall live on -site.
2. Before use as a Bed and Breakfast, the building and cooking facilities
shall be approved by the County Health Officer, Fire Marshall and City
Building Official and a Letter of Occupancy received by the community
Development Director. (This may be done in stages as rooms are available
for guests.)
3. One parking space for each guest room shall be set aside and marked "FOR
GUEST ONLY". Additional spaces are available for owners use.
4. If provided, dining facilities for breakfast shall be available to
registered guests only (not available to the general public).
5. No liquor shall be sold on premises.
6. One four square foot sign is allowed on -site consistent with the
architectural character of the building.
7. Adequate pedestrian scale lighting shall be provided between the Inn and
parking area.
8. No general external lighting of the site that may impact the surrounding
residential area is allowed.
9. The Special Use Permit is not transferable. New property owners or
managers shall require a new Special Use Permit.
10. The Bed and Breakfast use permit shall be reviewed before the Planning
Commission and City Council for revocation if complaints regarding the Bed
and Breakfast use are received by the Community Development Director.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
See listed conditions.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and is in harmony with the general purpose
of the Bed and Breakfast Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Report
- Site Plan
- Sign Design.
5/4/90
Attachment to Special Use Permit Request for 319 W. Pine
Introduction
The city code of Stillwater Chapter 31/Subdivision 23
Supplementary Regulations/Section 'h.' sets forth=requirements
for applicants to meet,if they wish to be issued a Special
Use Permit to operate a Bed and Breakfast facility. The following
explanation is to illustrate our complete compliance with
these items. Each item listed directly corresponds to a
requirement listed numerically in Section W.
It is the intent of Bruce and Vikki Brillhart to make
319 W. Pine their home, and make the operation of their home
as a Bed and Breakfast a positive contribution to the historical
and commercial community of Stillwater. Furthermore, an
eventual goal of the rehabilitation of this historic property
shall be placement on the National Register of Historical
Places.
Explanation
1) Attached is a Preliminary Site Design Plan which illustrates
the proposed arrangement of the required seven (7) parking
spaces. These are arranged to provide minimum impact on
the major facades of the structure, and neighborhood.
2) Dining facilities shall be available only to registered
guests.
3) The proposed facility is located on the S. E. corner of
the intersection of Pine and 6th St.The closest existing
Bed and Breakfast facility , the Rivertown Inn, is located
one "long block" north and one block east on the N.W. corner
of the intersection of Olive and 5th St. The shortest
pedestrian travel between these two facilities is
approximately- 350 paces or 1,050 ft. Comparatively,the
length of the 300 block of W. Pine St. which is typical
to most Stillwater city residential blocks is about 110 paces,
thus a typical distance of 3 blocks would be approximately,
990 ft. This interpretation would place the two facilities
more than the required distance apart,and complies with the
intent of the supplementary provision.
4) Liquor shall not be sold on the premises.
(cont.)S.U.P. Request Attchment 319 W. Pine
5) The proposed location of a Four(4) Square Foot identification
sign is shown on the attached preliminary Site Design Plan.
A design sketch of the sign is also attached.
6) The proposed location at 319 W. Pirie-is in an RCM Zoning
District which is permissible to Bed and Breakfast facilities
by Special Use Permit.
7) The current confirmed age of this structure is 1884,when
Jacob Bean, a prominent business man, is recorded in the
City Directory as having his residence here. An illustration
of the house during his residency is attached. The house was
probably built by the Hersey family for E.L. Hersey shortly
before 1884,but definite historical confirmation is pending.
Historical note is made of the structure,in Looking.Backward
by E.L. Roney ,a historical pamphlet from the Stillwater
Public Library collection.
"Samuel Hersey never resided in Stillwater, although
two of his sons- did and they built three of the most
elegant homes in the city.... Facing each other at Pine
and Sixth, are the former Bean home, now made into
apartments,, and the home across Pine Street,.... They
and the Hersey -Staples block are the remains of the
Hersey -Staples partnership lauched in Bangor, Maine
115 years ago."
An illustration of these three homes is attached from a
1910 Sanborne map of the city.
8) The proposed facility will offer 5 bedroom units of varying
historical character in additon to the restored original
1st floor Parlor and Dining Rooms.
9) Area lighting shall be provided between the structure and
parking areas utilizing ground mounted bollard type fixtures.
This type of fixture provides safe levels of illumination
without illuminating the building facades unnaturally or
raisinglight levels of adjacent properties.
10) No additonal external lighting shall be installed other
than as approved by the city of Stillwater for Item 9 above.
11) The proposed facility will comply with all State and County
requirements for operating licenses and forward written
proof of compliance to the Stillwater Director of Community
Development prior to commencing operation.
12
0
t.Q
'l. ,0 JKY I � N I ✓�
4
I of
_4 Ow"00
71
7,
ow
k
®R
A6.a
49. %*%
ON.
Fri
-vi
N4-
.EA
N
��sl�fJL�
ezv
�is,� 2 :�15�'l�Cs►�
L oo�
48
kIT�vo
P/,/ 6TN rz
T I
{ ALL
--I
j� P�Lvcz I�xls�1 ��
31g W.-FI 4�-
5I'►FEFL`4-1
,1;2
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/90-26
Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990
Project Location: 421 South Main Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: Kenneth G. Duneman
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Special Use Permit to conduct a temporary food vending business out of a
popcorn wagon along Nelson Street.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to place the popcorn wagon which was recently located on the
corner of Main and Nelson Streets to a new location along Nelson Street. The
wagon has been located in Downtown Stillwater for a number of years and the
owner would like to remain in the general area.
This area along Nelson Street between Water Street and the river is very busy
during the Summer. The Rivertown Trolley is across the street from the site.
Buses often unload passengers in this area for the Andiamo Boats and other
visitor attractions, and five restaurants are located within a half -block
radius. Adding to this congestion may cause additional traffic problems in the
area. There are no sidewalks along Nelson Street in this vicinity so there is
no definition between pedestrian space and the street.
This Special Use request is similar to requests made for peddlers licenses in
Lowell Park with the exception that this will be located on private property
along a public street.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The electric hook-up shall be inspected by a Stillwater Building
Official.
2. The popcorn wagon shall be setback ten feet from the property line.
3. The popcorn machine shall be removed by November 1, 1990.
4. A trash can shall be placed near the service counter.
RECOMMENDATION:
Determination of request.
FINDINGS:
This i s a very intensively used area in Downtown Stillwater. Adding an
additional commercial use to this area may cause a conflict with pedestrians
and vehicles.
ATTACHMENT: Site Plan.
1 I
or�h line l
1 - �ry,n� /share o F (CL.*e
r �Q,scf file or/1fC/farJStl.-ere ��caCx orn Faye -373
—
0\�3 i90 - `�1 \ 'Vec. 1-27-Ia75
Y> _ N73o�o 33p'9a -
R 54
�f o•DS , . l�l O ff dot �Or� fee G p ���� Jon ,( fPP.
�v Pgrce/ comer cez` 1` // S� lie C°n N3'H� _ L7 Oo k 1• ,
Corner of bu:/ce.�ZF \ 1 a{ / N 90
'00
e p+d e
� C� n�^� 71
r � ,on vy � �o n ,S�cG fed
- e ! re
1 1 {herlJ�ed
5 6` �w
o Jdck - �y d SSPP Z r+
o c.8 Ajy Pla�? _ a' Comoro
cLore
co- f
❑S Q' o �`�� E le- va-tor
[j75_J W0.lI�
,�{ ( a.li ca: >? Wes "IryRp/wo{rm4°r
}}�� J///�6�r et Long daf,o� �L'� '� rQa fwu�CTr rlss�er a �.
u, o�Al yy
c s�
C'o. o { 3zi//Grfc�t�Cr
� � _ Pp � •Q4, /roar.d ���
1 C'onC. WoLlk ThG �••on d � ycn,,1G
r
N ot�•
ltl7 . D n I
ert fr 4r ❑ 4 nG �o
❑ETA I L G • j�D V� Snhm G'orner iS
aIf verhar3 tear 4 �oP eccye �'r y° g0 ter
O ,C rcl&t e� W 7 i' ease c y{p p �j o / , row a�' a %
pnt-gam ek wOi! ! �� l5 3 / ba �bocct -no
o2r
cent r»4le- � d
//o/4y inP/tic C
S$ Loa!/ o.lo J1'or �•, . p 4 , R �: �� �� ' /' r(
��. rJ01 of (3/d9.Cornac
0
X C E e d n S �`,, Noee: T.,,.-r 1' e� O ro
r, b O'C6 encroachment -, C 4K
d,� BpOKe 3'J� ,0� / n �rMgrk,•n � � 1"r 4.
DE /vo sea/e -
0i'A'.e' a&030 r ,�� Ay
1 ❑ o .S� Sr ��-
o PPS
�erLe/ �'a `s
k Cl r
s.4 Gra ss
P.P.
N.SP.
T1-0_ ns /'orrn e r
.St c,.ti 0/7
r,
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. ANN/90-1
Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990
Project Location: North of Extended West Orleans and South of Lily Lake -
Benson Farm.
Zoning District: Stillwater Township R-A
Applicant's Name: Steven C. Fiterman - Ground Properties
Type of Application: Annexation Request
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Annexation request to add 88.5 acres to the City boundary. The area is known
as the Benson Farm.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to annex the Benson Farm to the City. The old Benson Farm is
completely surrounded by the City of Stillwater and street access and
utilities are available to the site.
The annexation application is part of a three part application including a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA90-1) and Zoning Amendment (ZAM/90-1). The
proposed use of the site is single family. The single family use is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan. A detailed PUD and Subdivision request consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan is required after annexation. Two parcels of land
to the North, currently in the Township, of the site are not a part of this
petition and should be considered for annexation. (See map)
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with annexation of additional lands to the North of the petitioned
area.
ATTACHMENT:
- Annexation Site.
Mom 4
10-imuc ���/ 1 .� _I! K.. _�l •N ;!, H 1i
- FTrT-
Y'
(WORKS
AREA
DARK V 7 'STORAGE + ''�- �,w • Y j�-''`[�
�$L-._. 4 -• - •fir i� ��-�J;- r� .
� , - ;, r CSAN� �7 � • �I il-- �Fr'. ��1 rl '[r'• yA • �{ .
Tr 1
•.�� i r"f J Ij�...... .r v- „r _�y!_,- 'N•, �.A7: g r �}
ITT
i
RD
• � �:Ril ,_ � � ! .: L _ . � 1"� �� '��' _ ar.- •: -� _- .lrr • +� s• � r-- � r � � .-a y. L
11 fe -19 Z I
40 T '•ri ` �•�, r2E �7 9' 1#"" �Jl/ ' .�S a '-'! I.-1 .3Y �r .. I 'P
LjLj
e ��_ NI•• i i ; .
i I �; _ �� o- a • .,F 3 ��, .�, �L s. �^ Cr�r ,� � ' la k' I
f -'1 1 - r3 ',-dui .•�FCFY ` i ^� 47-7 ALIIE! !
rn
./ ■ • `r`'; -ICE ARENALILY LAKE
LL
j,�I • Ste" ! \ ST 7 (RECREATION ^�
CENTER) MCA
• ` RA
COIi 10PAre CIM17$ +.—T c { r '0 ±'• • i i
P—' erT ■ I ' "
_ :rr�r y _ ■
+cu +,.n� r rsraa s rAeeu . ' . R %� — F-
R- iA'A S 1
'r 1 r 3 3 4 ,
4
P c 1' '
RB
r
i � o j NINI I i ice,
• = r WTI°T . 11 dLEPr/ON I i � TaR►E.�! I P}� mow'
I . /
STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. M
WA:.I N NI I I IIN
AV L.
r ti
m
�m
ON
O
MZ
m
-� D
-4m
3
r
�
r
<
�
% a
�
m
o
a
� �
z
a
'
£
a a
a
a z
z
1 >
T
x T
a
0
y
o �
o
z
w a
> a aN
m N
in
m` I m F n
a
10
N O
w w u n N
T
� y
1 1
on on n � n
n a a a a a
N N N N N IT/1
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. CPA/90-1
Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990
Project Location: Benson Farm - North of West Orleans, South of Lily Lake.
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family and Multi -Family Residential
Zoning District: Township R-4
Applicant's Name: Steve Fiterman - Ground Development
Type of Application: Comprehensive Plan Amendment
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment adding 88.5 acres of land to the City Plan
boundary describing the area land use single family and adding the land to the
City of Stillwater Urban Municipal Service Area (MUSA) boundary.
DISCUSSION:
The amendment site is located in the recently approved Stillwater Business
Park Plan Area. The single family designation is consistent with the
residential land use designation for the area (see Land Use Map). Tile Business
Park Plan designates the South portion of the Benson site multi -family
residential. The proposal is for single family residential. With that
designation, it is particularly important that care be taken to buffer the
single family use from the commercial use located South of Orleans.
A Subdivision Plan submitted with this application shows a possible
development concept. A neighborhood park located to the South of the site
would provide for project park needs as well as buffer the residential area.
The property abuts Lily Lake to the North. Lots are shown adjacent to the
lake. The Business Park Plan indicates the slopes around Lily Lake shall be
protected and maintained. Some of the lots along Lily Lake will have to be
reconfigured to maintain the sloped areas.
The Development Concept provides most project access off of West Orleans
except for eight lots adjacent to Pine Tree Trail. Other policies in the
Business Park Plan related to the site pedestrian access to Lily Lake School
and Lily Lake Park. (See section from Stillwater West Business Park Plan
attached.)
At this point, the proposed development arrangement is a concept project.
Changes regarding access to Pine Tree Trail and bluffline protection can be
made before specific project (PUD) submittal.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
Tn ee rr quest is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
�.. (D m
G1 n rt. ro r- N F✓ rt cn
v, m r- r M
?{ P.
ro rt
O O O N N O O O r•
a a c n rr
F•• rr w r-
w kn m X r,-
Ll, (D
h ro :3 C] rt a rr (D
p c m (D
m r
CLn O t3'rt �3'
plw w m
roc
(D O o m h7
ai N N 7 I
(D m
(DR7
rr (
n N
n m m
wkLQ
w �+
IDa
-<moamoa
m
pi ay
°
m
O
m
g r' rr� ryt
}. �
o,
r�¢n
rrr n x m❑
w to
acc
:3 P-0(oya
aa a.
m a
a r c nc� w n
m a
N o d
n o, L.J.
rr Fr
(D U]
] (D(Dm (tr D Mn
m n ° N
c ro rr
(^ E
P�' a m N£(D y
N m 7 C
O (D
in
m m N• r- N r• (D
:Irr
a m r+
m N� O
N r•,
r
'* r-r (D W
7 r '
Pi
o
H
a r
a rfi O rr =
] O r.> r' N o
n W
m� n'
n
L1 n U] (nj w~=
F N
rr rr N N
C a N m pi
Ri
r G
° n c
(n m r N m rl
Bpi
�' m m '�
G �C
os N
r• �.
x N i rr G
a r. o F a
�" n O G m
ra
rrt
w
m P. w N m rt w rr a �.
n rl
a' fD m
a.A.
c P.
O m n� ro °'
7 m m a m
m
rh rt rs m
°
N m;
by 0O N.
O+
O
F
rr C- m F G Lo
n n
CD
ka ~
"ho a'rr
N r�a
m ~rtm
'* c
r• m c m r(D
N
rt a
o rr n rr N r• a
] 7 '� N
fn N N W
r r W rt
w
r
o ro
w m a c
o r'
o r* .
(rr D (DEL
w m
amen
a(D
(Dro O Fw rh
r N rr
Na.
ro(D -In N•
" m 4
m�
°rt�ma(�
Z F•b
.,
h3 cu O
m N w a F N �C
P.
rr m 0
N
(�D
N rn La
m
m
(D a i0 ° a
rt
OCli
rt a
o
Ortm
O
rt a,m rr
Nw
T
� C ro°
m
r•rfid+Cl.
�m O O a
rr
OA
rr F.
w m
(D a rr ro r• co r•
ro (o cL r, m F_
° y
r• (D
ro (D N "rC
p'
5
C7 o-C
a (D P.
rr O a R,
F '
(y. 0
rrta
7
o� n,o°n r.
c-oc
m'�r
wpm
p~000w'<�'
n (D
rr
o w
a
n
x10
O G
rtma,rtroxa W
p'
r,
a
r•
F
w N r cn
] n ro ° I rt CL
rr a
m m
Vrl
er
~prcWwnw�h
m
n ~ r( o m
w�y�
nnFwmGr
°' cu
yn
W'
G6n
NOw aN (D
1<II.
F-y Z
NO
m¢anm
0
rm
?
w PJ N
+ mmc
P. a
G
Gcn En x NI
rr a pr~O
1�0�
0
w��0 aN
rrF+•b
ri-
tln
°mM
r
M
I
ro� mCrr w
� m m O L
_1
P. A O .En
►
ro
•
ro m rr
a
a rr m O n� rt c
tcl
mr
H
r - O+ rt. � m m rr
h
WA.IIIINIsI%IN
AVI.
r 5 �
m
o
a
x
� � a
o a a z
y p c a
n cv4 O m� s� i y M N
r
'•o � _ yiar b m
ti•, � n''^ tI rn i y� O
►O Y A -�
O
� ■ b V
Y Y
ti t l A A A A A
a a
b Y M b b Y
r
ter
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Planning Department
DA: May 11, 1990
RE: ZONING AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR BENSON FARM. ZONING SINGLE-FAMILY PUD.
CASE ZAM/90-1. STEVE FITERMAN, APPLICANT.
The request is to Zone the 88.5 acre site Single -Family Residential, R-A. The
proposed zoning is consistent with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan
for the site. See Comprehensive Plan staff report.
Recommendation:
Approval.
Condition:
Zoning shall not go into effect until after land has been annexed to the City
and the Met Council has approved the City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan
Amendment request.
Attachment: Ordinance
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
6
y0
iF Ir ;;WA
MALLA
PARK
A
' �� '�_ L - rr�- yam. a 1��\`. ��rr��r'� K '3•
DRIY -
fMCA:.i.N
LPAP 4 i
� 2• i • PAPK
r N'•�• - s r •
r2
I
4a(RE0
Lp
� Y
?�h
i rwrar
.3
Ix-
2eV '
H 'z2 lT1 Q r 3 �t' I RA
V 1 •MCA .
y1
Lr•
• ra
y
4 i'r p I r
'v PARK
Al
4, r
5 T !�
' II1 3
_ � N
,I..
IND SCHOOL DISTRICT e34 PROP, a
Tr
PUBLIC 1I• -'
• N3 a ��� __/5_ �/r
WORKS
STORAGE I
AREA ', _ •Y _ _. µI
1 •I$
Iz - 3 0 _ �� .+ 4 s .•
,PaI+D
�
� ' z
p ,► ;j f I r I, rjT'
' w OLItiE
i-T 9 • 2a T -a- `- 2. 7
'-4 x
z G.
Ire
17
-
Iry PINE
1 .
- 1. � _ � � • �.. --y`�` � 1
a I• l
i` �R Ll r l L c
SCHOOL
47.7
rjl477.7 IC,�
ACRES
p , OUTLOT A P~1
3
PARCEL ' PARCEL 2 PA R{'EL 3
a CURVE CREST BLVD W
K
' N
1 2 3 4 t 3 6 g
12 41 10 9! e l T F
'CRATE' LIMITS
T B
PARCEL a
]UT'.OT A ml a-!rWT C
Ia
(LILY LAKE
RECREATION
CEN TER )
Case Number ZAM I _/
Fee Paid ___.LC?_- -------
-
h
Date Filed _ _�1-��
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Str eet Location or Property: _ O-� \c�� ��=-.---------------
Legal Description�O Property. `�` R_
C
Owner: Name _------`____ __-_. __________ _________________
Ad _ _dress -- __-- -_ _ ___ Phone: y=
r�u+rlicarlt (i� G+tiiei iiiaiw7 4er): ainB
��`e�.. i S�U4. t �` -2 BLS
' �- j1v Phone: �'
Address _�SJ_5_----------------_ - -----_
Type of Request:' Rezoning __- Approval of Preliminary Plat
Special Use Permit Approval of Final. Plat
___ Variance ___ Other ----_----___.._-----
Desc. ip<<on a: Request: �_ --- ----------------- ��`_ S,v�,��.
Signature of Apo c
Data of Public Nearing: ----------------------
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n back ot. this form or at-
tached, showing the following: �n
1.
North direction.
2.
Location of ;ropased str-.:ct::-e or. lat.
2,
3.
4.
Dimensions of front and side set-bac-z.
Dimensions of structure.
R
proposed
`-eet
ti
5.
S names.
6.
Location of adjacent existing buildings.
C
bus
7.
Other information as may be requested.
`fin
U
Approved ___ Denied __- by the'Planning Commission on ________
subiect to the following conditions: _____-_-.____--
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on _____-_-
following conditions: ____________________________
Comments: (Use other side)
subiect to the
ORDINANCE NO. ZAM/90-1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY
ZONING AN 88.5 ACRE TRACT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "RA"
The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain:
1. Zoning. The 88.5 acre tract of land annexed to the City by action of
the Minnesota Municipal Board in concurrent detachment/annexation proceeding
and that is the subject of a comprehensive plan amendment as set forth in
Resolution #8039 adopted by the City Council on March7, 1989, is hereby zoned
Single Family Residential "R-A'
2. Amending. That the zoning map as adopted by Section 31.01,
Subdivision �t the Stillwater City Code is hereby amended to include that
tract as Single Family Residential "R-A". The tract is shown on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
3. In all other ways, the City Code shall remain in full force and
effect.
4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council:
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
NJary Lou Johnson, Clerk
Publish:
r ter
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MAY 8, 1990
SUBJECT: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT,
STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK.
DISCUSSION:
On February 6, 1990, the City Council amended the
Comprehensive Plan by adopting the West Stillwater Business
Park Plan. This plan was complied after seven months of
study under the direction of the West Business Park
Steering Committee. The plan established specific goals and
objectives for the area, a land use plan was developed
along with zoning recommendations and design regulations.
The Implementation Program states specific land use, road
system, utility and parks, and open space actions in order
to carry out the plan.
As first action in the implementation phase of the
West Business Park Plan, a Zoning Text Amendment and Zoning
Map Amendment for the 'area should be reviewed and
discussed. If Planning Commission feels that these zoning
changes reflect the policies established in the Business
Park Plan, a Public Hearing will be set for the next
regular meeting of the Planning Commission and following
City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and be prepared to discuss the proposed Zoning Map
and Zoning Text Amendments.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING
IP-I INDUSTRIAL PARK INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT
1. Chapter 31.01, Subdivision 22 entitled IP-I Industrial Park Industrial
District is rescinded and is hereafter enacted to read as follows:
Subdivision 22 entitled Business Park Industrial District.
(1) PURPOSE: To provide a district for light industrial and office uses.
(2) PERMITTED USES:
Throwing are permitted uses:
(a) Limited manufacturing conducting a process, fabrication, storage or
manufacturing light materials including electronic components and
accessories.
(b) Automotive painting, upholstering, tire recapping and major repair
when conducted completely in an enclosed building.
(c) Research laboratories.
(d) Business, professional and medical office services.
(e) Finance, insurance and real estate office services.
(3) SPECIAL PERMITTED USES:
The following uses are permitted by Special Use Permit:
(a) Radio and television facilities.
(b) Printing, publishing and allied industries.
(c) General warehousing and outside storage.
(d) Outside storage (must be screened).
(e) Mini -storage.
(f) Wholesale trade.
(g) Commercial nurseries.
(h) Retail sales of products manufactured on site so long as no more than
twenty percent of building floor area is for retail purposes.
(i) Cultural or governmental facilities (movie theatres, libraries, fire
stations).
(4) USE DETERMINATION:
A Special Use Permit may be required when any other use or service
establishment determined by the Planning Commission to be the same
general character as the foregoing uses and which will not impair the
present or potential use of adjacent properties may be permitted.
(5) GENERAL REGULATIONS:
(a) Height of buildings:
- Maximum 40 feet
(b) Minimum lot area 1 acre
(c) Setbacks:
- Front 40 feet
- Rear 30 feet
- Side 20 feet
- Abutting Residential District 75 feet
(d) - Lot coverage 60%
- Landscaped Area 20% of lot area.
- Front and sideyard setbacks shall be landscaped.
Adopted by Council this day of , 1990.
ATTEST:
CLERK
Publish:
R
T
A
0
z
-1
D
n
m
Al
01 ,q
O
= n�pR7NwE5TER!
�AA�w�4 E
LAN
�,{ I. L
y��0 ro
sr+ausTRiaL aL�o.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING
IP-C INDUSTRIAL PARK
COMMERCIAL ONE ZONING DISTRICT
1. Chapter 31.01, Subdivision 19 entitled IP-C1 Industrial Park Commercial
One District is rescinded and is hereafter enacte to read as o ows:
Subdivision 19 entitled Business Park Office District.
(1) PURPOSE: To provide a district for office uses.
(2) PERMITTED USES:
The following are permitted uses:
(a) Business, professional and medical office services.
(b) Finance, insurance and real estate office services.
(c) Research facilities.
(3) SPECIAL PERMITTED USES:
The following uses are permitted by Special Use Permit.
(a) Governmental and educational institutions.
(b) Day Care facilities, including preschool.
(c) Wholesale trade.
(d) Retail - general merchandise.
(e) Eating and drinking places and cafes.
(f) Cultural facililties (theatres, libraries, museums, art galleries,
etc.)
(g) Warehousing and inside storage.
(4) USE DETERMINATION:
A Special Use Permit may be required when any other use or service
establishment determined by the Planning Commission to be the same
general character as the foregoing uses and which will not impair the
present or potential use of adjacent properties may be permitted.
1 (5) GENERAL REGULATIONS:
(a)
Height of buildings - maximum
40
feet
(b)
Minimum lot area -
1 acre
(c)
Setbacks:
- Front
40
feet
- Rear
30
feet
- Side
20
feet
- Abutting residential district
75
feet
- Lot coverage
60%
(d)
Landscaping:
- Area minimum
20%
of lot area
- Front and sideyard setbacks snall
be landscaped.
Adopted by Council this day of
CITY CLERK
Publish:
1990.
p�Akw�0 LAKE
.e � L
L�R p v
1
r
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RESCINDING
IP-C ZONING INDUSTRIAL PARK COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA DOES
ORDAIN:
1. Chapter 31.01, Subdivision 18 entitled IP-C Industrial Park Commercial
District is rescinded and is hereafter enacte to rea as to ows:
Subdivision 18 entitled Business Park Commercial District.
(1) PURPOSE: To provide a district for general community commercial and
o t uses.
(2) PERMITTED USES:
The following are permitted uses:
(a) Wholesale trade.
(b) Retail - general merchandise.
(c) Specialty retail.
(d) Food - retail.
(e) Eating and drinking places and cafes.
(f) Finance, insurance and real estate office services.
(g) Personal services (dry cleaning, beauty salons, etc.)
(h) Business, professional and medical office services.
(i) Fast food outlets.
(3) SPECIAL PERMITTED USES:
The of owing uses are Permitted by Special Use Permit.
(a) Retail trade not previously specified.
(b) Cultural facilities (movie theatres, libraries, art galleries,
theatres).
(c) Auto repair and related services.
(d) Day care facilities, including preschools.
(e) Hotel/Motels.
(f) Outside sales areas.
(g) Drive through business.
(h) Commercial nurseries.
(4) USE DETERMINATION:
A Special Use Permit may be required when any other use or service
establishment determined by the Planning commission to be the same
general character as the foregoing uses and which will not impair the
present or potential use of adjacent properties may be permitted.
(5) GENERAL REGULATIONS:
(a) Height of buildings - maximum 40 feet
(b) Minimum lot area - 1/2 acre
(c) Setbacks:
- Front 40 feet
- Rear 30 feet
- Side 20 feet
- Abutting residential district 75 feet
(d) Landscaping
- Area minimum 20% of lot area
- Front and Sideyard setbacks shall be landscaped.
Adopted by Council this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Publish:
MAYOR
all