Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-10-04 CPC Packet6114A� iWater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA October 4, 1990 THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1990 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 216 NORTH P. H STRIT-l7— AGENDA Approval of Minutes - September 17, 1990. I. RCM, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential District - Study results and zoning amendment recommendations. A. Case No. ZAM/90-6 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment changing the zoning on residential areas surrounding the Downtown from RCM Multi -Family Residential Medium Density to RB Duplex Residential. City of Stillwater, Applicant. B. Case No. ZAT/90-5 - Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment adding a new Public Administrative Office District, PA, to the Zoning Ordinance Land Use Designations. City of Stillwater, Applicant. C. Case No. ZAM/90-7 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment designating certain none3-lan s from a RCM Multi -Family Residential designation to PA, Public Administrative Office. City of Stillwater, Applicant. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CASE NO. V/90-60 - Variance to the sideyard setback requirements (twelve feet requested, twenty feet required) for the construction of an attached garage at 322 West Churchill Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Duane Arndt, Applicant. 2. CASE NO. V/90-61 - Variance to the Parking Ordinance for a residential/ commercial building at 220-224 East Chestnut Street in the CBD, Central Business District, Historic Commercial District. Shawn and Becky Otto, Applicants. 3. CASE NO. SUP/V/DR/90-62 - Special Use Permit, parking, sign variance, and design review or the construction of a train depot and parking lot at 601 North Main Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District, Flood Plain, FP, Downtown Plan District. David Paradeau (Minnesota Zephyr), Applicant. 4. CASE NO. ZAM/90-5 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment changing the zoning of three fourths acre of land from residential duplex, RB, to CBD, Central Business District located between the railroad and Main Street, north of Laurel Street. City of Stillwater, Applicant. OTHER BUSINESS 1. CASE NO. DR/90-7 - For your information and discussion, design review for the placement oI a temporary fence at 102 North Second Street in the CBD, Central Business District, Historic Commercial District. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Date: September 17, 1990 Time: 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman Angela Anderson, Glenna $ealka, Duane Elliott, Jay Kimble, Warren Pak ulski, Don Valsvik Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director Members Absent: Judy Curtis, Rob Hamlin Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Angela Anderson, seconded by Glenna Bealka, to approve the minutes of August 13, 1990 as submitted. All in favor. SIGN ORDINANCE_ Don Valsvik noted, for the Commission's information, that the State has adopted a sign ordinance pertaining to political signs which allows larger signs and a longer length of time for signs to be up than the sign ordinance adopted by the City of Stillwater. The State's ordinance supersedes that of the City. PUBLIC_ HEAPINGS Case No. SUB/90-51 - A resubdivision of two lots of approximately 8,105 and 13,800 square feet into two lots of approximately 8,905 and 13,000 square feet at 813 North Everett Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Herman C. and Shirley Duckworth, Applicants. The applicant, Herman Duckworth, was present to explain that he wishes to purchase eight feet of his neighbor's property, and his neighbor is willing to sell the property. There were no comments from the audience, and the Commission members had no objections. There is one condition of approval. Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Don Valsvik to approve the Resubdivision request with one condition. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. SUPZ90-52 - A Special Use Permit for the placement of a permanent forty square feet sign at St. Croix Catholic School, 621 South Third Street, in the RCM, Medium Density Residential District. Robert Mike, Principal of St. Croix Catholic School, presented the request. He explained that the students had raised the money for the sign, and a temporary variance was issued so that the sign could be put up for the opening of the school year. Stillwater Planning Commission September 17, 1990 Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Glenna Bealka to approve the Special Use Permit with one condition. Motion carried 7-0. Cas.Q No. YZ9 -55 - A Variance to the sideyard setback requirements (five feet required, two feet requested) for the construction of a 720 square foot garage at 617 West Olive Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Barbara Schmotter, property owner, presented the request. Motion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Angela Anderson to approve the Variance request with three conditions. Motion carried 7-0. Case, No. V/90-16 - A Variance to the 20,000 square foot lot size requirement for the placement of a septic system on an existing lot at 1911 North Second Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Jon Lentz, owner of the property, presented the request and explained that the older home on the property which was demolished had no septic system. He will be building a new home on the site and will require a septic system since there are no City sewer services in this area. Steve Russell informed the Commission that the size of the lot meets the PCA standards but not the City's. Also, a perc test has indicated that the soil is adequate for a drain field. The new home will be a one bedroom, one bath, with no garbage disposal. The lot is 100 x 150 ft. Motion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Glenna Bealka to approve the Variance request with two conditions. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. SUP/90-54 - A Special Use Permit for the placement of an overflow fifty four space parking lot on Greeley Street for Lakeview Memorial Hospital and St. Croix Valley Clinic at 919 West Anderson Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Gary Moody, Chief Engineer, and Mark Wilson, Assistant Administrator, presented the request. Mr. Wilson explained that this plan is seen as a temporary solution to the parking problem, and the plan did not call for paving of the lot because of the cost involved. He stated that the hospital is currently working on a long-term plan for the parking problem, but is not prepared to disclose that plan at this time. There was also discussion regarding the question of drainage. Mr. Fontaine opened the hearing to questions from the audience. A resident of 914 South Greeley, across the street from the hospital, asked what the property will look like during the temporary phase. Mr. Wilson stated that the hospital will be agreeable to a fence along the north side of the parking lot and 2 Stillwater Planning Commission September 17, 1990 evergreen shrubs along the Greeley Street side. The applicants would prefer to do landscaping as it would be less expensive than blacktopping and curbing. The applicants are agreeable to a one-year limit on the temporary parking situation, as the master plan will be ready by that time. City staff recommended nine conditions of approval, which were amended as follows: Condition No. 1 requiring surfacing of the lot was replaced with: Approval is for a temporary parking lot for a one-year period. A preliminary site plan or a paving plan will be required for review by July 1, 1991. Condition No. 2 requiring marking of the lot was amended to read: Parking spaces shall be clearly delineated. Condition No. 3 requiring curbing was eliminated. Condition No. 4 was amended to require a six foot minimum fence on the north side of the lot, and evergreen shrubs between the parking lot and Greeley Street on the west. Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Warren Pakulski to approve the Special Use Permit request with conditions as revised. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. SUP190-58 - Final Plat approval for Phase I, Forest Ridge Addition, including eighteen zero lot line duplex lots in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Lawrence Rose, owner, presented the application. The request is for 19 lots of the original 42 lots approved by the City Council on September 5, 1990. There were no comments from the audience. Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Duane Elliott to approve the Subdivision - Final Plat request with six conditions as stated. All in favor. Case No. PUDL90-57 - Final Approval for Phase I, Forest Ridge Addition, an eighteen lot Planned Unit Development (a part of the previously approved forty two lot subdivision) in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Lawrence Rose presented the application along with the builder, Mr. Gardner. Mr. Russell stated that there should be architectural design compatability with the project across the street. The Commission is concerned with this project setting a precedent for future development in the area, and therefore would like to set high standards for design. The builder agreed to submit design ideas for staff approval and then Planning Commission review at its October 8 meeting. There was also discussion regarding landscaping plans. 3 Stillwater Planning Commission September 17, 1990 There are three recommended conditions of approval which were amended to include reviewal of a landscape plan before building permits are issued. Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Angela Anderson to approve the PUD request with three conditions as amended. Motion carried 7-0. Case No. VZ90-53 - Variances to the east and west sideyard setback reejuire'lllent5 (ten feet required, six fret proposed) f i)r an eighty nine stall parking lot and number of signs allowed (one allowed, four proposed). This property is located east of Kangaroo Storage on Highway 36 Frontage Road in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Paul Pink and Associates, Inc. representing Bakers Square Restaurants, Applicant. There are five recommended conditions of approval. The Commission added a sixth condition: 6) The City Engineer shall review the drainage plan. Because of existing signs for other restaurants in the area, the Commission agreed to amend Condition 2B to allow a 100 Sq. ft. pylon sign, with a 15 foot setback requirement. Motion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Glenna Bealka to approve the Variance request with six conditions as amended. Motion carried 7-0. Ca �� e No . SLJP/90-59 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a small office business out of a residential home at 2527 Interlachen Drive in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Thomas and Debbie Odell, owners of the home, presented the application. They explained that they recently purchased the home and moved their graphic arts studio into the home in order to be home with their two small children. They also made the purchase of the home because the mortgage payment would be less than the rent they paid for both a home and business space they previously rented. There have been complaints from neighbors that the Odell's business has caused increased traffic in the neighborhood. The Odells stated that there has been an increase in traffic because of friends and relatives helping them move in and coming over to use the pool. They have one part-time employee who works at the home business and one outside sales person. Scott Ulrich, 2516 Interlachen, across the street from the applicants, stated that he has seen the employee come .and go many times during the day, and there is an increase in cars parked on the street. He feels this is hazardous to area children who must walk around the parked cars because there are no sidewalks in the area. 4 Stillwater Planning Commission September 17, 1990 Bill Englund, 211 Edgewood, directly behind the odell's, asked for clarification of the City ordinance. Mr. Russell read the ordinance which allows professional services with one employee in a residential area. Chris Larson, 2580 Interlachen, stated that she has no objection to the business but is concerned about the increased traffic and the employees' cars parked on the street. The applicants stated that there is room for off-street parking and will direct the employees to park in the driveway instead of the street. They also stated that they foresee this as a temporary situation and as business increases, they will move the studio to another location. There are four recommended conditions of approval. The Commission added another three. Condition No. 5: The Planning Commission will review the Special Use Permit in three months or upon complaint and then again in three months. No. 6: One full-time and one -part time employee are allowed. No. 7: The Special Use Permit is for a two-year maximum without reapplying. Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Angela Anderson to approve the Special Use Permit with seven conditions as stated. Motion carried 7-0. OTHER The Commission set October 8 for a Public Hearing on the RCM Zoning study and recommendations. Motion by Glenna Bealka, seconded by Angela Anderson to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Motion carried. Submitted by: Shelly Schaubach Recording Secretary 5 ak1a. ter THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ANN PUNG-TERWEDO, PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1990 SUBJECT: ZONING STUDY OF RCM, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS AND ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS. During the Summer of 1990, a Land Use Study was conducted of the RCM, Medium Density Multi -Family Residential Districts. On August 13, 1990, Staff presented the results of this study to the Planning Commission. The Commission directed Staff to prepare these results and Zoning Amendment recommendations for presentation to the residents of these areas. Please review the study distributed to you at the August meeting. An existing land use map and a proposed zoning map are attached in order to let you compare land use with the proposed zoning as shown on Map "B". Be prepared to discuss these Zoning Amendments for recommendation to the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Zoning Map Amendments as presented. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 HAP 3 iMulberry North RCM F ' ' ' ' . • Existing land use ® Single Family Duplex Multiple Family Institutional Cherry Str eet Linden ' Street 0 Street rD 0 vacant/parking MAP 2 urQS I rr o N a s + n r c�-t --' X rD 3 ¢, C-+ Z3 _� rD to J W [ p II MAP B P �hN l S i A '44 Zoning Text A� dmenAkand ap Pfi r mendment recommm' dat' ns ' x , •� _� 1 1 � y 51 1� - 1-t •�• ,s � �t. 37 13 ' �� 'S❑ I 1 k r , -14 yi 1 a i 111i i- � �I _ ? tit a 2d .l!II 1..:1i- I- '�.. •.l Z �p A T' S� 1i. - 1 K t I � 1 � •z 1 N 3' �LY�� s ' 14� ! F •Y ' 7. 5-�1 -Proposed Zoning . r _ F \\KEYNAr .°°-_.. - PA -Public Admi n trati.ve Dist. � { SE��, 1r B-Two-.Family Residential Dist. CM-Medium Densit Multi- ' 4e q7 7 Resident 1 Dist. �• tea.. ram- ���r.� ;1 so �- -r \ I / j 7i �' . 117' �a it f 1 � - �._. �A_- � �•,\\ \\ 1 1 I I ' \ S T { g w . '. 7 6 S .. _ .. 4t =3 _ ?'_ '- 1 '- x 4r I 17 { [ I I Q �'k ,•X: B f I I 1 r-..U$V�7'.] -� ,_ S i } R 1•fil.. � - w 16 _17.. p 9 - Ia - // /7 - ... /3 • y /4 - •- -- /5 -.. /6 — ' � � '`• 1 I I I x 4i]BUrOUE ST. T It PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/90-60 Planning Commission Meeting: October 8, 1990 Project Location: 322 West Churchill Street Comprehensive Plan District: Residential Zoning District: R-B, Residential Duplex Applicant's Name: Duane Arndt Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Variance tovthe sideyard setback requirements (thirty feet required, twelve feet proposed). DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing a new two stall, 686 square foot, garage replacing an existing one stall garage. The proposed is to line up the garage with the house approximately twelve feet from the side property line. This would result in cars parked in front of the garage overhanging -the sidewalk. The house to the North on Sixth Street is set back at least twenty feet from the front property line. There is room in back of the proposed garage to set back further. It is recommended that the garage be setback twenty feet minimum from the back of the sidewalk to accommodate pedestrians. RECOMMENDATION: Denfal as proposed. Approval with twenty foot setback. ATTACHMENT: Plans. 10� Case Number ----- --- a'-o Fee Paid ___ �) __-- Date Filed 4-7 -------- pLARIITING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM ,I l Street Location o� Property: _ _`_ ��C'__ ______ __ ___ Legal Doscri Lion of Property: _ r __ _ ame ��rT t _ Owner: 1� _�._ ____ ____._ ______________...___________.. Address_ _�a_L`_'_-____�_ _w_____ Phone,33z:a_-, �;-qq Applicant (if other than owner): Name ___________________-_____-_______ Address ------------------------------ Phone: Type of Request:, ___ Rezoning ___ Approval 'of Preliminary Plat Special Usa Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat �_ Variance _ Other _ Descriptian Qf Reciuest: 4-1 �-,U- Signature of Applicant: Date of Public Hearing:______-_______-_____-__________________w��w__ NOTD: S retch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n 'back of t`i form or at- tached, showing the following: L North direction. 2. Location of proposed structure on lot 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. �. Dimensions of proposed s . ucture. 5. Street names. 6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved ___ Denied ___ by th©'Planning Commission on subject to the following conditions: Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on following conditions: __ (date) ________ subjee, to tl-,e Comm. ents: (Use other side) I J 8 ,riA)e LJ, 4-f PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. V/DR/90-61 Planning Commission Meeting: October 8, 1990 Project Location: 220-224 East Chestnut Street. Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District. Zoning District: CBD Applicant's Name: Shawn and Becky Otto Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A variance to the parking ordinance and design review for residential/ commercial use at 220-224 East Chestnut Street. DISCUSSION: The request is to restore the building at 220-224 East Chestnut Street. for first floor commercial/office space and second floor residential. The restoration as shown on the elevation is a planned certified restoration. The applicants are working with the Preservation Office on their certification. The parking demand for both the residential and commercial use is thirteen parking spaces. There is no on -site parking to provide for this use. The elevation plan explains the general restoration work on the building. Major facade improvements are to restore the original street level facade or inspect the glass tile facade at commercial level and restore that. The second level facade is intact. A porch was attached to the building at one time. A smaller porch is planned to be on this level. The restoration plan meets the intent of the design guidelines and purpose of the Preservation Ordinance. Signage is not shown on the elevation; however, the applicants have stated that window painting in period style, approved simple bracketed hangings sign and awnings, may be placed on the building. All signage must be approved. CONDITIONS_ OF APPROVAL: 1. Parking for the commercial use is designated to the assigned city parking lots. 2. A sign plan for the building shall be submitted within the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. 3. On -street parking for the residential use is allowed after 4:00 P.M. and before 8:00 A.M. Monday thru Saturday. The applicant may contract for off-street parking with private property owners at their discretion. 4. An engineer's report shall be submitted to the Building Department in reference to the porch on the second level. 1 FINDINGS: The proposed restoration meets the purpose of the Preservation Ordinance and Design Review Guidelines. Although the parking does not meet the parking requirements, the conditions of approval assigns alternate locations for parking. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION/DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The H.P.C. recommends the certified restoration plan for this project. It meets the intent of the design guidelines and Preservation Ordinance. This project is one of the first projects in Downtown Stillwater to take advantage of the tax credit for restoration. It is a great example for future projects of this type. There was concern about the extension of the porch on the second level. The applicant stated an engineer's report will be submitted to the Building Department before building permits are issued. ATTACHMENTS: - Elevation Plan. Y � I ! i f. .I• -pappop oq of Joloa v u! sleoa Z rolq P°B 1puq .Song lu!edox pug ozudaJd ZZ rJ Doren-g olunbJpu Surmvlgo to sasodmd arll JoJ '>laonoags .BIS Jo Smgleags qjTA\ pagnmd '8urr!= doJp pameJl-pooh a llvlrm oI ,Sressaaoo lT olvmrlso oleuJO11s apinoJd •SuTgleagg mJol!un Jol O! gJ1vd • vo!l¢lnsu! alenbape Jol uoTllppv Japmt BOrpo3 ,Sonv podsul TZ � •Surlloo goled p0v alglnWj !4OTI puo0as moJl sJr¢ls 1peq pa0npugqu omail OZ D ys mJ!OiL 01 JOOp rpJeq JOAO MopoTm 1110StiUll vT Jmd 6T rJ .' -Eon ARE u! s q'g.q poTlonum ologd E apuoJd •sJalam s pug yauad qns BOrrraol osnoq ouo pow sloped Suppor dam Ool 6 ql!m aawos duns OK moo op!AoJd ST 9 Z-v Jod wool ,(Jpunvl Jol Joop Mau apuoJd pug cm is Oopaegy pub lg8!I PoP!AIP q1!& Joop 1a219 luopvnmlJa Jo voIuSoIIgv:) mo!e-Onj ap!noJcl Z-d Jad uo.1vool omgc u! sOvm lg8raq TIOJ ql!m aavldo d •luomaseq OZZ of sJTels rpeq Jano poqs onomag •I. Li 7 •ole8 le pug 'dmvi to oovld OT Jas!J passogma mod • •Jassogma uJalled oaolsolggm qj!M )log olTgm dmel pug:. -: - alanu0a ql!m modal !,(Jvssaooa se pOvS •dmeJ 8orpnpm pug o1 1l¢M opeael mpg ',Saba le gels ParpwaJ aAomal;'.-7i i4 ' PaPpop aq oI Jolo, m!Jl paw osonls lured, pJeemep aagm uorlrppv rpeq mjiS uo!ufi is oaonls Jlgda�l ST ❑ •aauunodda Tva!S!Jo of wolsaJ 61 dJgssaaou so 1puq lmod pae 'chop ' i Pug '>(Juq mpg laTed poe a!lsam'aT.1 OAomaJ 01 prsodaid oleuJolly apuoJd •apwel 7pJTJq lem8uo of o8amep pug Sl!l!geJolsaJ uo salamTlso opTnoJd OoTlanalo laanS Inulsroq] JoAal lvolammm it opwarl op.1 Tml padsoT••:' }T f) ,shun Joddn Jot aauvrm ZZZ iv golel a!uo.rloap 'ql!M moolalar 91TJnan lrun-Z plw! pov opuurd ';. iT 3 ; •Jgllomleu.2u0 30 SurloOl pug 'Joloo'.Uaalq=03 'ainpro) IPIVN'13019 eJpra TeuTSuo airs-uo wog rla!Jq paleJoualap Jo 8mssrm vovldaJ Tslulo[Jv1Jom palviopolop Jo osool Tlv lmodrpny , Zi ly •papp.,p aq al omagas JOJOO Jad •aAllTPpg *IaJlasrad Jo 00 paasml Tim %91 Jamud lro 'rlgoa Z gstay pow amrld •mu10) 4gnrl 1olvd a!lvmoJgAclod JOIoo •V *P!AWd '.'TT I) •Su!pjOm gauq pug si-p'vmop- Jnuo;n lry drrlwaglvas pow llln4]•'.'OT'J' . L �8j Mimiluo ZZy 8urrlov!l slgSq 113903 ssesq p2f1011am•alo0 PIP ! pop'DPMgJ `' 60 H '. i •apoa I" Jad 8url!vJ a141 poi rad apTAOJd qw& owls to pan is Sonavg ovq "no ag pug uoggrs vuols of JaSPaI nJly -8a.4"p pal"Jl .9 x 6IS ql!.0 Aua3lnq pop-M p'alvon Jaddoa ,9 x.p palJoddns INico nnalsuo� Sp•r0r. ! •21e8 pug oauol von 1gSnoJm ,g Ovi" pug q—f polAls pound ql!m Sv!uodo moo Ino m!J•ly •!anal loons0aanls 1e umnloa rolq PUB sJOop onomO_d LO C) e •1812m loogs glut golgd pug ooruJm moll suo!suopra lnodsumop pouopuvgv anomaJ YJessaaou se 23MU03 Iv12m bays PaZ!oeAfVS JaplosaJ POE MM2J 'moJosoil '. go'd •rival An uT lno p20v3 sv gooeds Twnnmmoo gloq Jol a8eu8Ts laaplomm(s opuoJd of Jopuiluoo Iviouo f) •sSu!ume pug 'Yu is SuTSueq palarpeJq oldm!y panoJddv 'ol,Q9 po!Jad uT SurlO!ed mopOTm of Palrm!I a8auF!g ;oloN SO E) apeael 12nal hang Ieu>8uo oJolsaJ pug Va le Surumv onom?il VO f) '01,09 pug pound amgg to oftAles puns Jo doom mou palpm oral gl!m mrn papoJ aaeldw pve padcul CO D apvael leauolsrq a,uovaJd of Suoarvq 1e JOop mmis JOuaJul Mau-llnj apuoJd ' Zp D --Kopolm (ally Jot olnsvarn puv T sluomaJnmw IIv Aju*A plo!g •smop" mJolg uoflm al�u!gg aAO![1 TO flmmlmm NOI-LVUOiSAU LiOiU3-LXA NO S31ON IVU3N35 T Li r Y� 'I 1�1JIA5 I! .1� CJ ll; sl.l LNll'7rJ�i1S = •-�-'~ J (d,,, i.al DD:l )1:Id9'ti:��-:ri rl.•r.r. r:rY. -..... -....._.: _.._._ _ _ _ 7 1T ..;-- -- -- rc�nnonnri t3nt�nn[z .nnranniin��inTi n.nilri_rinauFjPrinrinnilnZIAM ILL,1=� ijir;ii----:nl.-uri.ni7i7tlnn.nnaiin.cnnn[1 _-- ___ ONI 1NIVd HS3Hd :HO1OVH1NOO WH3N39 tl3uxnH o�nlAvro 9Z96-LZ3 S311H3dOHd XANO :H3dO713A3a i NW 'H31VMll11S '-LnN.LS3HO 3 4ZZ-ZZZ-03Z 0351A3tl Ob/st/b :31V0 0110 WVHS :3lVos AB NMVtlO :AB 03AOtlddV NOIIVUO1S3d a31d11LIBO SNOI1VA313 :C-V vGeAllap 19 1us!a1l 'sexel 'sll[xusd aped 8 ao buipllnq 'uslnsu 'uollellr,suoo v uo161A1edns 'logel palllHs 'siglialevi lie apnioul of lesadoad 'suoll a!nbe1 I eeuilepinS laoal pus 'olels jejapal aigeo!Idde lie qj!M 63uepJ0030 u1 s!fgap V elsgM pOlemof lie to lenoujel lol elgfsuodsor sl 1owgJlum :aouslnoDo led uluf o00'0055 4ilM eouslnsul Alfliclsi pue duloo H1oM to loo1d opinold +g pesueoll eq 01 1oloealuoo !suoIla!nliaj pus sopoo 119001 tlllM eoueploaoe ul HJOM 110 I.uJ oNed pue sualsuaw!p Ilg /4!1aA ping 01 s1013e13uoo-cans pue 1opequOC ' ': ' ,..; '- • :� .. . • ' .ucppus2ajul 1oliclosil�Jo� lralaav>� _ eyl PUri U o* p1r 0q8 F3p Jj iiayl to 410M ai{y'-yaa►lg• Lnul.spJnpuels ss.ally:nAoy �ulpie6si'' ,'suogsenh.ens4 oqm slojoailuo0-qng'; sfiuJ�rinB ol1Q]sIN �u!]sIAl4aJlekl'�ol sr�repusi5;; s;rolleluI aul to f lu;aJoas S6101S poIm 8� 1 t[i!M aauepaoaas ui p'su)1o}rad eq al HJaµIIV [,tJOIPJrl; PJC)I!'dA3"13 1S3M ;W 4AW M :i21d � � I 1 r,rmr.rrJTlt v>r Y.'a W_-..rTffMi _ - -- _.. _ �_. _ ruU1';i:..r' ..... _..:is . " :'iTl7"+a;fidiRr,fi1] 1n.iu.sI3A313L10p r MIN PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. UP DR 90-b Planning Commission Meeting: October 8, 1990 Project Location: 601 North Main Street Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Zoning District: RB Applicant's Name: Dave Paradeau (Minnesota Zephyr) Type of Application: Special Use Permit PROJECT DESCR_I_PTION: The proposal is for a 4,500 square foot depot structure and 67 car parking lot on an 1.34 acre site. Twenty one of the parking spaces and landscaping extend on to the Highway 95 right-of-way and City property. The twenty one car parking lot and landscaping is on City of Stillwater property. A portion of the site is located in the Flood Plain District. During preparation of the Downtown Plan, this site was designated Special Use #2. Use and design guidelines were specified for the site (attached). The use proposed for the site is consistent with the Downtown Plan guidelines. The design guidelines specify that the site landscaping complement the North Main Street streetscape plans. Based on the proposed improvements, most of the landscape screening is located on the road right-of-way and not the project site. The State must give the applicant permission for the project to encroach on the right-of-way. The 21 car parking lot located North of the existing railroad spur is owned by the City. The City has indicated they will consider leasing the land to the developer for employee parking as long as the parking is completely screened from highway viewing. The developer would be responsible for improving the parking lot and landscaping the site screening the lot. A railroad spur currently separating the City land from the project site. In order for the project to work, the spur will have to be abandoned by the railroad. DESIGN REVIEW: The tirst evel of the depot will be constructed of quarry stone, similar to stone walls located in downtown Stillwater, redwood siding, and redwood brackets will be accent materials at this level. The roof line of the depot is similar to depots built early in this century and the GAS timberline shakes are modern copies of roof treatments on early depots. The dormers and central atrium area add interest to the design. A Stillwater sign will be located on the north and south elevation of the depot. These are simple signs characteristic of railroad signs for stations. The round arched windows and the elements of the dormers are reminiscent of the Union Depot in Stillwater. The preliminary site plan shows where the depot will be located on the site and parking for the use. The site shows sixty seven parking spaces. The lighting on the site will be similar to the light posts in Downtown Stillwater Plan along with similar decorative benches. The proposed landscaping was appropriate on the North entrance into Stillwater. PROJECT ANALYSIS Tne project does not meet the development requirements (setback, parking, signage) for the district. The site is in the R-B Duplex Residential Zoning District. (A change in zoning is being proposed, Case No. ZAM/90-5.) A thirty foot setback is required for the building. The proposal is setback less than twenty feet from the front property line. The parking requirement for the depot if considering the train as a restaurant using one space per 2.6 seats is 88 spaces. The applicant has indicated that 120 spaces are necessary for employee and customer parking. If the highway right-of-way spaces are subtracted from the project, 46 spaces are available for the use. This is 42 spaces less than what is required and 74 spaces less than what is needed. The plans show 21 spaces on City property North of the site and 26 spaces on Highway right-of-way, bringing the total to eighty nine (89). The City is planning on constructing a 70 to 80 car parking lot on the property across Laurel Street directly South of the site. REgardless of MnDot's determination, parking will be available for the use with the construction of the parking lot. The landscape plan shows a landscaped area on the MnDOT Highway right-of-way between the parking lot and NOrth Main Street. A five foot sidewalk is shown next to the street with a space for three feet of landscaping before the parking lot begins. This minimal sidewalk and landscaping improvement for section of the street frontage. If permission for use of the right-of-way for private parking is not granted, adequate land will be available for parking. A design guidelines on the Downtown Plan indicates that parking areas shall be screened from Main Street view. It is recommended that a ten foot landscaped area be required between the parking area and the street or a 2 1/2 foot screen wall and landscaping similar in the stone used in the building be used to screen the parked cars from street view. This site is particularly important because it is the first City development as one enters from the North. The site plan shows Laurel Street (Yacht Club driveway being relocated to the South and use of the right-of-way for parking and landscaping. This would have to be approved by the Yacht Club and Burlington Railroad. No lighting plan has been submitted and a location for a monument type free-standing sign is shown directly in front of the depot (in the Highway right-of-way). RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. A detailed signage plan showing signage detail shall be submitted for Design Review Committee approval. One free-standing monument sign is allowed on the site which shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet and not project higher than six (6) feet. The sign must be setback fifteen ( 15 ) feet from any point of vehicular access, public roadway, or property line. The area around the sign shall be landscaped. This plan shall be submitted to the City for review. 2. A lighting plan shall be submitted for Design Review Committee approval. 3. If the employee parking area North of the site is constructed by the applicant on City land, the six spaces on the East side of the lot shall be eliminated. 4. Parking lot landscaping shown on the site, Highway 95 rigrit-of-way and City land shall be installed by the applicant before project completion and occupancy. 5. The applicant shall agree to be assessed for the City parking lot to the South of the site, based on on the site parking demand. 6. The City Engineers shall review the plan to relocate Laurel Street and the City shall obtain BN and Yacht Club approval as needed before building permits are issued. 7. The first floor elevation and all mechanical equipinent shall be elevated above the regulated 100 year flood level. 8. The development agreement between the City and the developer shall be modified to include these conditions. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSIONIDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The design of the depot and the site plan meet the intent of tiie Design Guidelines. The depot design incorporates old architectural elements into new design. It is very sensitive to the visual image of Stillwater. ATTACHMENTS: '-- S plan . - Building Plan. 3 Case Number Fee Paid Date Filed . PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM - Si. 1 yM'i----� I V6 tt eety Location of Property: 1 Legal Description of Property: _-_-________________________-________..__ Owner. game -- ___-- _----�.------� -- Address --______________ Phone:(a Applicant (if other than owner): Name _---_-_------__--___---_--_-___-- Address------------------------------ Phony: ___-____-_____- Type of Request:' __- Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat X Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat __- Variance __Other Description of Request: ----��ylf�----.i��i�/�v•`_ ,_7------------ Signature of Applican�: — __ _------- ------ Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------------- NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn,on back of this form or at- tached, showing the following: 1. North direction. rL`��-�j'456���� 2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs. Srp ige 4. Dimensions of proposed structure. PAID 0 5. Street names. _ G,+,w.0 6. Location of adjacent e--ustin buildin s. fi �x��" 7. Other information as may be requested. Approved _-_ Denied ___ by the Planning Commission on ------ may'?_ (dae)� subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------ _______ Approved ___ Denied _-- by the Council an l ----===--=----=-"subject tot ,e=:.. following conditions: _----_-----------------------------------------_ Comments: (Use other side), ch v CD-0me�rhr1-CLCD un o '9 w m rn -hn w o -moo —X m o= w —o O C!1 -h CD C1 w — m to CD — rh rt �. �• h O V7 C c* (A O c r I — CD CD Co C) CD rr -+ -, CD rh w -1, -1. CD -1 Cn w p -�• i..r C) O rr I CD C) CD - �. Ca < CD CZ CD Ca CD C -S CZ CD ::E CL rh CD CD (D -M ...i. CD CD w CD O a;p N N rr C) rr CL (A r rr rh a �. _, p N CCD rr w CD O OJ C-P p CD CD w C (A N =r O a CA n -» C) O w O y d e-h CD 0 CD rwf. c n w O vpi sw c = �', a CD p �• O IT CD �, � O O O CD U] d C CD 0 O= n Ca O � CCD gin c 1 -h 0 w rr O. CZ CD 3 CD • rh CD -Z M < CD w cD cn m z � � A O c* -O p CCD CD rr N O 'O CD a �. w-0 O _ N = O O CD N � 0 Z c'1' C3 CDrr I(A O O O O r} cl, =r CD O C -h =r rf l"f � rr rr CD CD w • w - 3 N i = CD to 7r = w J. =r � J. ww�wC-+U3 Ln�, C/7 -0 rt N rt' l� c'F Ln CD rh -7 CD w �. O - c�•r 'z �. CD CD w w n N -a R CD a �c � O 4 O C N � �. O rr _,. fD << O -h ? CD w N r* o m m=3 SU n CD C -•h 0 O n CL CD rh -'h CD O N to CD CD Z I N �. -7 C-h = = O O w -0 (A O' w O 3 O w w 9rr a -h _0 erg CD " n -1 n CD < O m=r O :F- =r CD I IG 1 CD CD n C1 CD I cn n fD C) w N CD N O O -h C N t0 3 O Cn CD w I CD rl' O rr O O CD CD =r -a O CZ w !a N -+• w w Q "s rr m C ar a r rr p O co -S N O f- =r rf -h —0 rr CD o OO n � n N C) O CD to C+ CD CD Ln cr O Cr w --h CD O ct C1 w rt c �. CD c O 'r a a N � CL �. e-r Ln w O C N O -0 N • d w 1 N w CL O CA = C. n E n a o CD rr '1 O O CD n 10 CD O rp rr w CD V C1 rr rr CD - �-a w n CD o a O CD CD fD N � • CD m � CD n � rD � n � CD �t N � CD n � J O C) X O �< M CD C � N -h CD O N � IC3 C) 3 -V p< N C C --• rt 'O to n O •--1 Cy rh C -S C N 0 N S n W C -h a S S — 7C" CD rC' CD -h < r+ '9 CD CD CD • O to ") �• CD CA CL 'D "3 i CA CD • • '-h -3 C LSD CD CD -1 rF = - N to O tv N -S CD a = .0 a rr Ai rr = --• -- C� r O C C< C"f rt CD C1 CD :F_ CD G> > C< (n CD a as ;^<< r- CAD a�� m c � CD 'h CD C1 C L o CZ CD f �. �• = = p' -% U3 cD r+ v OLq C °' = �. CD rr O � CD C1 -h O C)C O CA 0 (A y_= Ali C O p C9 -' '� O G+ 00 N CD rC• N Ln CD CD =O O rF 7C" CD CD -) O = O CL a CD trt ca Z lv O e r -h CD S O rh A� O O r) O -3 .r. to -h CS -i r+ �• o rt C) arr cn �O CD =rf�H S 717 0 CD C L _ O [D O O CO CD A) qt w I CD 'TCD — rr �W _ = wo CD �N )•CD r+-1 CA CD 0— N 3�— = 0 y N 0 a C-+ � C a a CD CD CD A' A) CD r+ ...+. N c+CCDD COD Cl ctd r=* pi F' ru rr C+ � '% C CD O p.CA C 0 O X pe = rDD CD to A' a r+..rr--a N rro `o a a o = row H = �' c a �•o CD -- 3 CD C1� Cn = = I C+ a = N ID C L A) =. -'• n � A) n CD O O fl O CD < rF -s < to --• CD — Cl CD CD CA r+ C L CZ C L CD A) CD = CA (.n "3 O CD N -I < — C+ C C r CD -% iL = rr r+ (D CD rr- CD n o n r+ S S C1 -f CD N r+ W rr -+• O CD fi rC • a C-) '-`o CL CA-1 o SCD -� CD 1 I CD CD = CD C1 N CD C /) p D CD CD O O O O O N 0 �. a_ = w+r= 4c CD tn a = o w rrl-= _ CZ 1 N CZ :c n -S CD L7 CA a (A c 1, _ 7T CD C �• O CD CD -n rr Oj CD �• v CDCDCOD "3 CDCDCCDD O f d Ca C`A CD (L :E N O O N A O •--� =ik N C-r 10 — rr CZ n C1 CL L- .. W _0 O G) rr -3 'D p � -z -o O = Cy-1 a �.CD Cl CD 0 CD CD -b a Un to rD M �� �� v= o � �•� O03 CD to S Cn rF < G) _ = CA CV �+ r+ S CDC O C) CJ1 --� CD PJ O CZ S O -0 d fl Cr ct 9 -+ -I D CD --• O CD CD _'• M r+ O N n = - O rh CD CMD N CD CD CD -3 O N n W 'l -3 O = S Z = < CD CD O O O CD --• n -0 C") CZ CD N M Cr rr C CD N rt S CD �. A) = a 0 � M = •3 rr CD O Ca CD n N << tit � a -h lv CD O O CD CL N d CD V7 co Cn E3 fi rr CD c 3 e-r -0 a n. N N � -b -3 a -" �• CD CD CD B A' < CD r+ CD x a CD -+ N (n = = (Arh rr C cr � CD — CD rr A) w B N cOr a N rf CD rt CD -h = a Cl CD CD rr N i f — '' dill1water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1990 FROM: ANN TERWEDO, PLANNER RE: ZONING AMENDMENT - RB, TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO CBD, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. The property located at 601 North Main Street is presently zoned RB, Two Family. This zoning does not reflect the existing train attraction use of this property. Also, the Downtown Plan identifies the land use and subsequent zoning of these areas as CBD, Central Business District as shown on the attached maps. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the City Council that the attached zoning map amendment be approved. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 .is LnNLS3HO IS 3%d :�` LW-211 I ---------- k J. 0. -1 ft , to -19 -M a ff - wm I .., m ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE SECTION 31.01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED ZONING/ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The Zoning Map is amended as indicated on the attached map. marked "Exhibit A". Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by Council this-- day of 1990. -- Wally /Abrahamson, Mayor Attest: Mary_Lou Johnson, C! rk a3 Publish: �4j rp 18 1J 7/6 /9 fGY + U- —... S �1 I 11A N AVE. AJER 12 1.3_ 14 13 "EXHIBIT A" L i i Asp �`. 4]1 ... •^+— -... ' -•--• �3 ?ram -- - 6 — f `jam. .. 4 J J 2 xa J_ti`- s 'r i ZAM/90-5 _ T 4, l CBD, Central i Hess i strif t E ' '! i A I lt-: ,4; a , . —16 —14 12 H4 "" '2Q rA ko —21 La .� �� r • 3J ... a PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. DR/90-7 Planning Commission Meeting: October 8, 1990 Project Location: 102 North Second Street Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District Zoning District: CBD Applicant's Name: Lowell Inn, Inc. Type of Application: Design Review PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design Review for a temporary four foot chain link fence in the Lowell Inn parking lot. DISCUSSION: The request is to place a four foot chain link fence in the Lowell Inn parking lot in order to control the Inn's parking from the adjacent public parking lot to the north. There has been problems with public parking on the Inn's private lot. The design of a chain link fence does not meet the intent of the design guidelines nor does it match the proposed fencing in the Downtown Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The fence shall be removed when the City lot is improved or not to exceed one year. 2. Coordinated fencing shall be placed on the site when the City improves their parking lot. FINDINGS: They chain link fence does not meet the intent of the design guidelines. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION/DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: The H.P.C. recommends that the temporary fence on the North property line should be of dark green or back vinyl material. This type of fencing will be less obtrusive to the area. The chain link fence along Second Street is not acceptable. It does not meet the intent of the design guidelines. Whatever type fence that faces Second Street should draw architectural elements from the Lowell Inn, such as the picket fencing or wrought iron in front of the Inn. Another suggestion is to use a similar design consistent to the fencing shown in the Stillwater Downtown Plan. ATTACHMENT: Site plan. Ile, scale- In Fe-e-L -1 0 %'0 20 LA 0 Z; -11.� 1 10 end Y 12 7- z. 10 12- 1 10 13 8 LU z 2 0 v c rj L4- PROPO.SED AL ct Y, 0 z .3 4 L) 4 0 +ypie-z Ex s f; nj Plan BY: BrLi,--- A. .4T-7 rem.,,, s+'ce'� FW-RDAP - N - SHIP P.O. BOX 610 STILLWATER, MN 55082 (612) 439-2333 City of Stillwater 216 4th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 Attn: Steve Russell Subject: Temporary Signage October 2, 1990 Effective October 1, 1990 the 212 Main Street North location of Wrap-N-Ship will be undergoing demolition and renovation. Therefore, we request temporary Signage approval for both 212 Main Street North and at 114 Main Street North. The sign at 212 Main Street North is instructional only,directing customers to our temporary location at 114 Main Street North. This sign is; 15" X 14' 6". The temporary Wrap-N-Ship sign at 114 Main Street North is; 24" X 13' 6". Both signs will be removed by December 1, 1990, at which time Wrap-N-Ship will be returning to 212 Main Street North. We request temporary City approval for both of these temporary conditions. Regards, Vern Stefan/Owner Wrap-N-Ship WE OFFER OVER THE COUNTER SERVICE - FOR ALL YOUR SHIPPING NEEDS