HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-09-13 CPC Packeti water
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
September 13, 1990
THE STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 AT
7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 21 NOR H OUR H STREET-.
AGENDA
Approval of Minutes - August 13, 1990.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Case No. SUB/90-51 - A resubdivision of two lots of approximately 8,105
and 13,800 square feet into two lots of approximately 8,905 and 13,000
square feet at 813 North Everett Street in the RB, Two Family Residential
District. Herman C. and Shirley Duckworth, Applicants.
2. Case No. SUP/90-52 - A Special Use Permit for the placement of a permanent
forty square feet sign at St. Croix Catholic School, 621 South Third Street,
in the RCM, Medium Density Residential District. Robert Mike, Principal,
Applicant.
3. Case No. V/90-55 - A Variance to the sideyard setback requirements (five
feet required, two feet requested) for the construction of a 720 square
foot garage at 617 West Olive Street in the RB, Two Family Residential
District. Joe and Barbara Schmotter, Applicants.
4. Case No. V/90-56 - A Variance to the 20,000 square foot lot size
requirement for the placement of a septic system on an existing lot at 1911
North Second Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Jon
Lentz, Applicant.
5. Case No. SUP/90-54 - A Special Use Permit for the placement of an overflow
fifty four space parking lot on Greeley Street for Lakeview Memorial
Hospital and St. Croix Valley Clinic at 919 West Anderson Street in the RB,
Two Family Residential District. Gary W. Moody, Applicant.
6. Case No. SUB/90-58 - Final Plat approval for Phase I, Forest Ridge
Addition, including eighteen zero lot line duplex lots in 'the RB, Two
Family Residential District. Lawrence Rose, Applicant.
7. Case No. PUD/90-57 - Final Approval for Phase I, Forest Ridge Addition,
an eighteen lot Planned Unit Development (a part of the previously approved
forty two lot subdivision) in the RB, 'Two Family Residential District.
Lawrence Rose, Applicant.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
Planning Commission Agenda - Continued
September 17, 1990
8. Case No. V/90-53 - Variances to the east and west sideyard setback
requirements (ten feet required, six feet proposed) for an eighty nine
stall parking, lot and number of signs allowed (one allowed, four proposed).
This property is located east of Kangaroo Storage on Highway 36 Frontage
Road in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Paul Pink and
Associates, Inc. representing Bakers Square Restaurants, Applicant.
9. Case No. SUP/90-59 - A Special Use Permit to conduct a small office
business out of a residential home at 2527 Interlachen Drive in the RA,
Single Family Residential District. Thoulas and Debbie Odell, Applicants.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Set October 8, 1990 for Planning Commission meeting for public hearing on
RCM, Zoning Study and Recommendations.
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
Date: August 13, 1990
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman
Angela Anderson, Glenna Bealka, Judy Curtis,
Duane Elliott, Jay Kimble, Warren Pakulski, Don
Valsvik
Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director
Ann Pung-Terwedo, Planner
Members Absent: Rob Hamlin
Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order.
APPROVAL DF MINu-rEs
Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Warren Pakulski, to approve
the minutes of July 9, 1990 as submitted. All in favor.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. V/90-43 - Variance to the maximum lot coverage for all
accessory buildings on a lot (1,000 square feet required, 1,350
square feet proposed) for the construction of a 960 square foot
garage at 936 Fifth Avenue South in the RB, Two Family
Residential District.
Thomas Corman, owner of the property, presented the request. He
explained that the foundation for the garage has already been
poured because he did receive a building permit. The permit was
withdrawn after the building official became aware that the
existing caboose and proposed garage exceeded the 1,000 square
foot maximum allowed under the ordinance.
There were no audience comments.
Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Angela Anderson, to approve
the variance request. Motion carried 8-0.
Case No. SUB/90-44 - Subdivision of two lots in order to add
approximately 32 feet to the width of one lot and decrease the
width of the other lot by 32 feet. These lots are located on the
Northwest corner of the Frontage Road and Tuenge Drive in the IP-
C, Industrial Park Commercial District.
Richard Brackey, property owner, presented the request. He
explained that there are buyers interested in the lot, but they
require 160 feet. He agrees with the three conditions of
approval.
Condition No. 3 should read: A six foot drainage easement shall
1
Stillwater Planning Commission
August 13, 1990
be shown on the North, West, and East sides of the site.
Motion by Judy Curtis, seconded by Warren Pakulski to approve the
subdivision request with three conditions. Motion carried 8-0.
Case No. DR/V/90-4.5_ - Variance to the size requirements for the
placement of a projecting sign (six feet required, twelve feet
proposed) on the Southeast corner of the Grand Garage at 324
South Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District.
Bob Tanner, owner of Esteban's, presented the application. He
explained that he continues to have a visibility problem with the
restaurant in the back of the building. The sign will not be
lighted from inside and complies with the sign ordinance. It is
the same sign which was used for the two previous restaurants at
this location.
A fourth condition of approval was added: All temporary signage
will be removed from the building prior to placement of the new
sign.
Motion by Glenna Bealka, seconded by Duane Elliott to approve the
variance request with four conditions. Motion carried 8-0.
Case No. V/90-46 - Variance to the fence height requirements on
a street side outside the building line (42 inches required, six
feet requested) for the placement of a fence seventeen feet from
William Street a.t 901 West Pine Street in the RB, Two Family
Residential District.
Rahul Mehra, property owner, presented the request. He explained
he was unaware of the need for a variance, and has already
started putting up the fence. He is requesting the fence to
provide privacy and a noise barrier from the street.
There were no comments from the audience.
Motion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Angela Anderson to approve
the variance request. Motion carried 7-1. Duane Elliott opposed
on basis of the ordinance, and to avoid setting a precedent.
Case No. SUB 90-47 - Minor subdivision of a 22,800 square foot
lot with a multi -family residence, five units, and residential
Carriage House, into two lots consisting of 7,600 square feet
with a home and 15,200 square feet with a residential Carriage
House at 506 West Pine Street in the RB, Two Family Residential
District.
Clark Nyberg, owner of the property, and John Harper, the
proposed buyer of the property, presented the request. Mr. Nyberg
explained that Mr. Harper is having difficulty finding financing
for the five-plex. He has found financing for the Carriage House
2
Stillwater Planning Commission
August 13, 1990
and Mr. Nyberg is willing to carry a CD on the five-plex, but the
County requires that the lot be split.
The Commission discussed the problems involved with this
subdivision. Of main concern was the possibility that, if split,
this property could have two separate owners in the future.
The following conditions of approval were discussed: 1) That the
parcels could not be sold separately in the future. 2) Property
width of Carriage House lot is to be 48 feet. 3) Separate
utilities to be extended from Pine Street to the Carriage House.
4) An easement on the North property line for access to the
Carriage House.
It was questioned whether a hardship had been shown, and if
creating a substandard lot could be justified in this case. The
Commission members stated they are sympathetic to the request,
but that it is inconsistent with the zoning ordinance.
Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Judy Curtis to deny the
subdivision request, based primarily on the inability to come to
a conclusion on conditions to make the request work. Motion to
deny carried 7-1; Glenna Bealka opposed.
Case No. V/90-49 - Variance to the sign location requirements (15
feet required, one foot requested) for the placement of a four
foot eight inch monument sign at 1809 Northwestern Avenue in the
IP-CI, Industrial Park Commercial One District. James E.
Kellison, Curve Crest Properties, Applicant.
Mr. Kellison explained that the location of the sign is similar
to that of all the other signs on the block.
Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Don Valsvik to approve the
variance request. Motion carried 8-0.
Case No. SUB/90-48 - Subdivision of an 8.7 acre lot into two lots
of approximately 2.5 and 6.2 acres at the Northwest corner of
Washington Avenue and Curve Crest Boulevard in the IP-I,
Industrial Park Industrial District, James E. Kellison, Curve
Crest Properties, Applicant.
There are three recommended conditions of approval. It was
determined that condition No. 3 should be changed to require
drainage easements on the north and west, but not on the south
side.
Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Warren Pakulski to approve
the subdivision request with three conditions as discussed.
Motion carried 7-1; Judy Curtis opposed.
3
Stillwater Planning Commission
August 13, 1990
Case No._ 1UP/_90---50 - - Special Use Permit for wholesale auto parts
distribution for use located on the northwest corner of Curve
Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue in the Business Park
Industrial District. Curve Crest Properties, Applicant.
Mr. Russell informed the Commission that they must make the
determination if this is a wholesale business, as there is
currently no definition of wholesale in the zoning ordinance.
NAPA has indicated that 75-80% of sales are wholesale and the
rest is retail. A wholesale business requires a special use
permit; retail is not allowed in the BP -I District.
After discussion, the Commission determined that 80% wholesale
sales would be the minimum required to define the business as
wholesale. Two additional conditions of approval are required: 2)
80% of all sales are wholesale. 3) NAPA is to provide proof that
80% of all sales are wholesale.
Motion by Don Valsvik, seconded by Duane Elliott to approve the
special use permit with three conditions as discussed. Motion
carried 8-0.
Case No. SUP 90-51 - Special Use Permit for retail sales of
products manufactured on site for use located on the northwest
corner of Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue in the
Business Park Industrial District. Curve Crest Properties,
Applicant.
This case was previously approved by the Planning Commission, and
no action is required at this time.
OTHER
Ann Pung-Terwedo presented an Existing Conditions Report and
Zoning Amendment Recommendations for the RCM, Multiple Family
Residential District. In recommending rezoning some of the RCM
districts to RB, Two -Family Residential, Ann noted that there is
currently a trend towards changing some of the large multi -family
homes back to single family or two family residences.
She will study the impact of the RB rezoning on individual homes
and report on this impact at the next meeting.
Also, a public hearing will be held at the next meeting regarding
rezoning, and notice will be sent to all those affected.
Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Don Valsvik, to adjourn the
meeting at 9:45 p.m. All in favor.
Submitted by:
Shelly Schaubach
Recording Secretary
4
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/90-51
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 813 North Everett Street.
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: R-B
Applicant's Name: Herman and Shirley Duckworth
Type of Application: Resubdivision
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A resuboivis�€on o —two lots of 8,105 and 13,800 square feet into two lots of
8,905 and 13,000 square feet.
DISCUSSION
The request made by the applicants at 813 North Everett Street is to purchase
approximately eight feet of the neighbors property to the south on Hickory
Street as shown on the site plan and survey. This resident would like purchase
this piece of property in order to plant trees and bushes. The home at 813
North Everett Street does not visually infringe on the neighbor's property.
Both lots affected by this proposal meet the lot size requirements for the RB,
Two Family Residential District. The land division will not create substandard
lots and will not affect the setback regulations.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A new Cerificate of Survey showing the subdivision shall be submitted
to the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed land division is consistent with the use and lot size
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Survey
- Site Plan
- Application Form.
I
i
�
f '
I
Z
- - S3 F7
� � �
BeTw�tN g2r29r
x l
AND MY PrvptrTr�
I
�
I
r I
pry o ,
I
� t
1
I
`
�Y — -- - ► 38 Feel
OF,; �' F r
�a
v
a
a
a 71
y
n
s
G
fi
S,"Tne1� t.
i
O
So FT
C 100
Case �6/Q �9 t�lumbe S
CO
Fee Paid ---------------
Data Filed ------
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Street Location of Property: ___ IF ee%f
Legal Description of Property; �� r _��� ��� '74e N��� �l Z� re< t
P y;--_--------____,-..__ - -- -
y 1�1eC✓ lP a-f srojelf 1144y S 4��r`tr'cry �e y��'Tlwa�eH
Owner: hcme �? S �_ a _ wifkA,� r _ �,4, J ALI/ALAi'
-__- _ Z------
Address kf' --L �Ic'v^r _ s�___-__-__ Phone0_L4. _ �l3 lT y_2P/
Applicant (N- other than owner): Name ____________________
Address _________________________ Phone: -- - _--__---__
Type of Request:* ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
___ Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final. Plat
___ Variance _K_ Other --- Lo
Description of Request:
6,v �� _Ald,,—)A o- _
LofS _% 4-;-
lock
l�_—sT,+PIej,
4 w2f}�+S — 4 (�,�f� ow/
_Whi,�A wi���
Azn �Lvt. /he 14,e Nora 20 L-"_eL Lo�s'� �'� ,yow_ou,,.) Tlie No✓7� 1x ft o�Lots ��fl
�IaNT RG� �' 'C,f —d �u ��G/ o+d ey
Signature of A plicant:
P
Date of Public Nearing: ____-____-----------------------------------
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn )n 'back of this fo
1 JVtgq,
tamed, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed st—ucture.
5. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.
_z
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the *Planning Commission on ----------- (date)
subject to the following conditions: ------------------------------------
-
/9,V
4 � 'y-, o
CI
C7
��
O
V
., r�t
�� a
a•
OJ
:J
W
z
F�
U
a
a':
�
n
t,
Y,
O
'a
r
V
:n
T
C
1,3 -
e, r.
:7 nJ
s ro
O Q O
C ti
J M r,
LH J= ••i
.=I j
7 O
.: U
! C
>,00
C
a, -H
U .c:
V O to
r~ �M
%D r ri
x
J-: ,
O O 0
a.; aj
e: r
C•t
F W N
in
d "
„ o
Qr�i 0 v v
v J W
a F t o v o
azz
oW0 r
. Z u n ° a
W N t > • „
N tf N tj'LL9Z 3„SO, hSe00 S
--sF - •
III
zp4 /�1zZ,�Sp00 N t�� o v)
—Z— o
1 ! � �6,L� f o W !r � Q� O • � c
z7u� aNru 1 Z r
rt0 W 4 O � n' W � � ' 1 � '�•. � •
Lu
i l `
zo�3 ��4ti � a
I
W C(
uo
I
_ 4
z
I O
VW
W
W k
Its J
M,
QQ
1
z
zxda y
ar.0 I� ---- ui
D
a
W
N W !
114
,JW
U nz
O
�i
V
d0
z o
W 00
.
=tia:
z o4
` d�— t uv�o r
� h o A W --• OS• 7�H--- -
-� , - WSS
Z&o00 S
w
`U
!
OD
ri n
o
tp
m
u
z z
I =
o
h
o LJ 0¢
T¢
CO
NIQU
-Ot
�
(1-77e-L 9V .�?if�!^/ 0�11b'idJ O
�O
133�J1S 113y3A3 H1&ON
- i
W
Z
N
mz
Eq
J
E�
b
A
e �
,a u
a^
c
0 0.
u
tVV u
.0 y
U
a
�b
gr
Cl
w
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/90-52
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 621 South Third Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Multiple Family Residential
Zoning District: RCM
Applicant's Name: Robert Mike, Principal, St. Croix Catholic School
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Specs a}se Priiri t for the placement of a forty square foot sign for an
existing grade school.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to place a forty square foot sign on the south face of the St.
Croix Catholic School on Willard Street. This sign will be a permanent sign to
identify the school. Presently there is no other identification signage for
the school on the site. A building identification nameplate sign is located
above the front entrance.
The sign has been placed on the site as stated in the attached letter. The
blue sign was purchased from money raised by students. The sign does not cover
any architectural features of the building.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. No other signage is allowed without prior City approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
Tproposed sign will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and is in harmony with the general purpose of
the Sign Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Drawing of the sign.
- Letter.
ST. CROIX CATHOLIC SCHOOL
621 SOUTH THIRD STREET
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082
August 23, 1990
To whom it may concern:
Enclosed you will find our application for a special use
permit regarding the installation of a new sign identifying
St. Croix Catholic School. You will also find a drawing of
the proposed sign. It is my understanding that final
approval for the sign will be given at the September 10t
Stillwater City Council Meeting.
The purpose of this letter is to request a temporary
variance allowing the school to have the sign up by
September 4th, the first day of school. This past school
year students collected loose change to raise money for the
new sign, and it was Our hope to have the new sign up when
the students returned for the new school year.
Thank you for considering our request. If you have any
additional questions regarding our request for the variance
and/or the proposed sign, you can reach me at 439-55B1.
Si ncerel ,
fro ert M ke
Principal
"I�'+•'�i�,'. iF:7Tc1,'s"f'�'f%�sP.'�•�,�:fy::,t'a�'4•:i'r•'r=i.�':ii.,...;.�,-,.: .. � � . . ... ... .. ... _ .. ... .. '
f �, •yr ,� .. � .. -��i is::: -
.e
V ! ti •-
...i . J. ebb. .:\'�• . .,f .tip• _
I/ J
�`���r��� •• �� � ill � '�'
rrJ r�
(�r
.'.+i: -. wry"p ,• ...
Y.
•r'L w l:
u'14 �s
.xs•• }
a.
Ynl,. -1
f
J �e� •} .r.-
�.. ', SI:.. :; i.: •�
� .`tR4a--
n[ •
. i
..
-
'•Yid .
y� a
a 1 "K� g 'ham,• � ..� =!• ,,
F' t
.+. r.-fir s
�
.�•=•
.hh Y}
icwns
r. • i4
',
V
_
•
.L: .. 'iy. .,
r-•'.jti .. ,.sr...-..-.S�F•'r.:L �:�.r'�i:r'•.:
ti.
rn .... .n - ..
.. _ _'rh:�'.-•.:A.•X_::
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-55
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 617 West Olive Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicant's Name: Joe and Ruth Schmotter
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A variance to the sideyard setback requirements (five feet required, two feet
requested) for the placement of a twenty foot by -thirty foot garage.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to construct a 720 square foot garage approximately two feet
form the west sideyard property line. The proposed three car garage will
accommodate the duplex use on the property.
AS the owners of the property have stated in their attached letter, due to an
embankment on the west property line and the narrow eight foot driveway, the
placement of the garage at this location best accommodates vehicular access.
The owners want to provide off-street parking. Olive Street is quite narrow.
The existing 10 ft. x 20 ft. shed will be removed.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. All drainage from the garage shall remain on site.
2. There shall be no openings on the west wall.
3. The garage shall meet the UBC code for one -hour fire rating on the west
wall.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The granting of this variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land
and buildings. This is the minimum variance to accomplish this.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Letter from applicants.
- Site Plan.
The property at 617 West Olive Street is a duplex and the reason for construction
of a three car garage is to provide off street parking for both us the owners, and
the upstairs tenant. Currently there is an embankment consuming the full five (5)
foot setback. This in turn makes the driveway a narrow eight (8) foot wide. By
reducing this setback to two (2) feet and constructing a retaining wall along this
driveway, this will solve several current problems.
1. Provide off street parking that is accessible in winter.
2. Eliminate the current erosion of existing embankment.
3. Provide a sitely appearance to garage, driveway, and retaining wall.
4. Provide width needed for thirty (30) foot wide garage.
NOTE: Watershed drainage of surrounding properties will not be affected. (See
elevation on drawing).
w
dl it
>
0
rr�
�
v
s
6
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-56
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 1911 North Second Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Residential
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Jon Lentz
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT LOCATION:
A variance to the lot size requirements for the placement of a septic system
on a 15,000 square foot lot.
DISCUSSION:
The request is for a septic system on a lot which requires 20,000 square feet
for a septic system. The 15,120 square foot lot, located in Dutchtown, has no
City services in the area. An older home was demolished on this property in
1990 in order to build a a new home on this site. A new home on this site will
further improve this area of Stillwater.
This area of Stillwater has no City sewer services. A study and survey was
conducted in 1989 to determine the feasibility of City services to this part
of town. It was determined that the residents of this area did not want the
services due to the high assessments.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The system shall meet the City requirements for septic systems.
2. The owner shall connect to City services when provided.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land. This is
the minimum variance that will accomplish such a purpose.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Application Form
- Site Plan.
. .. ... FeePaid_ _-_o_- -_-jyG
Date Filed __ --- y 6
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM -
S;ree; Location of Property:
(V�c2' 4�C4� ff J
Legal Description of Property: --
Owner: Name_ s14 --__--L =`J! =--------___--_-___-_--------------
Address _-�/03 -------- Phone:
Apaliccnt (if other than owner): Name __-___-_-_
Add,ess------------------------------ Phone: ---------- -----
Type of Reauest:' ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
Spacial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat -
Variance --- Omer ----------- ----------
• r
Description of Request: _1�1�r�cG�di.'_d--��•�1,¢�^_� --------
U LfILQ _..._
---------------------------f---_----------.------__-------------------------_
-_----_--_-_-----------_-____-__----__--_- -_- ��__-___--_-
Signature of Applicant: __1`1-
_w__ -----------
Data'
_ of Public Hearing. -______--------_--_
Nc)=: Snetch of proposed proiperty and structure to be drawn. on bac: o- this fa-= or at-
tac,.,ed, showing the following:
1. North direction.` l f
2. Location of proposed structure on lot..
3. Dimensions of front and side set -backs.
_ �'..:
p0_
d. Dimensions of ro0sed strL,ctU._e_ �C*
5. St-ee: narnes.
6. Location of :adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other information as may be requested.-
����'
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on
subject to the following cendi;icns: ____________________.-- ____�__-_
Approved _-_ Denied - by the Council on to the
following conditions:-----------------------------------------_—__-___
--------- � .
Comments. (Use other sic'e),
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO.SUP/90-54
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 919 West Anderson Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicant's Name: Gary W. Moody
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Spe-cia-T Use Permit for the construction of a fifty four stall parking lot in
a residential district.
DISCUSSION:
The request is for a Special Use Permit for a parking lot at Lakeview Memorial
Hospital/St. Croix Valley Clinic. This fifty four stall parking lot,
constructed this past summer, is to provide for overflow parking during the
busy daytime hours at the hospital and clinic. Hospital administration feels
that there is not adequate parking for employees and patients. Vehicles have
been parking on Greeley and Everett Streets during peak hours. Residents of
the adjacent neighborhood have been concerned with the increase of on -street
parking on Everett created by the hospital staff and the Stillwater High
School. The hospital/clinic is located in the RB, Two Family Residential
District; therefore a Special Use Permit is required for this parking lot.
In order to adequately identify the off-street parking need for the hospital,
the Parking Ordinance was reviewed according to the hospital and clinic use.
The total off-street parking for the hospital/clinic without the new existing
lot is 242 spaces. According to the Parking Ordinance, the parking demand for
the whole site is 254 spaces. With the new 54 space lot, the parking demand
for the whole hospital/clinic complex is met with an additional 37 spaces.
The Stillwater off-street parking regulations requires that parking lots be
constructed with curbing, proper screening, surfacing and adequate markings.
These requirements will be listed in the conditions of approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Surfacing. The lot shall be surfaced with a minimum of five (5) inches
of concrete or one and one-half (1-1/2) inches of asphalt overlaying
four (4) inches of base rock.
2. Marking. Parking spaces shall be clearly painted or delineated.
1
Case No. SUP/90-54 - Continued.
3. Curbing. The lot shall have continuous concrete curbing around the
entire parking lot.
4. The area between the fence and the parking lot on the north shall be
screened from the adjacent residential district through landscaping or
other screening measures according to the off-street parking
regulations.
5. All other off-street parking regulations pertaining to this case shall
be met.
6. The City Engineer shall review the parking lot improvement plan.
7. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit for the work conducted.
8. The Greeley Street side of the parking lot shall be planted with shrubs
or a hedge to screen the parked cars from the residential area.
9. This lot shall not be lighted.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to public welfare.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Site plan.
- Letters from Mr. Moody.
2
Case `lumber ------------
Fee Paid__-
��7
Date Filed
PLANNING ADMINIS i CAI IVE FORM
Sir eet Location of Property: 919 West Anderson Skeet _________
Legal Doscription of Property: Holcombe' s-Add-__Block_22. Lots_10,.11,, 12
Owner: game --Lakeview-Memorial Hos.-tal ----------------------
A ddress _919 West Anderson Phone: - 439w5330
�� Gar W. Mood
Apaliccnt (i; other �ncn owner): �(cme ---Y-------y--_------_------_____
Address _919 West AndersonPhone: _------
Type of Reeuest:- ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
_ X Special Use Permit __- Approval of Final Plat
--- Variance --- Other _---_--___--___-___
Description of Request: �L�_^LdCLt_tOJL.�d�Ct_�f_1ats1Q,.L1Y12T_Eat�-f-��ley
Street and north of West Anderson Street for overt low j2X.tLIlp�iaQ
Signature ok Applicant:_ off _ ..-
DGte of Public Hearing: wk_
NOTE: Sketch of aroposed property and structure to be drawn.on Dark. oI l.: s for-- or a:-
tacnea, Snowing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Locatioa of proposed st7.:cture on lot. ' y
1 ' Dimensions of iront ana side set -backs.
CA p��y�3�
V.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. , Q �s y ,
ja g buildings.
6. Location of Sa Cerit e�:i5�iia
7. Other information as may be requested. _�-
yr
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the'Planning Commission on
subject to the following condilicns:_____________________-------_-------
Approved --- Denied --- by the Council on ;o the
following condltians:------------------------------------------------
- Ccmments: (Use other side),
LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
919 W. Anderson Street, Stillwater, MN 55082
September 7, 1990
Mr. Steve S. Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN. 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
The purpose for the additional parking lot west of the St. Croix Valley Clinic is to
accommodate the daytime overflow parking from the clinic and hospital. This lot will
be used by employees of St. Croix Valley Clinic and Lakeview Memorial Hospital allowing
better access to the clinic for patients.
The overflow parking problem is only evident during daytime hours therefore I do not
feel added lights or signs will be necessary. The lot will not be utilized in the
evening hours and head lights should not pose a problem for neighbors facing the lot.
The lot will remain gravel surface.
For your information, I am enclosing copies of letters of explanation recently sent to
both the city and neighbors of Lakeview Memorial Hospital.
I have included a copy of the parking plan. If you have any further questions, please
feel free to contact me at 430-4339.
Sincerely,
Wr
Gary W. Moody
Chief E gineer
GM/rs
Enclosures
e- u - -C
kAfill,
I
r � ..-...- -: --- - - •---P �_.._.._.__ ._:�_� • _�
--- py
)YV
Ir
PY
@, LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
v Pu
sa n 919 W. Anderson Street, Stillwater, MN 55082
August 30, 1990
Mr. Karl Schoene
814 West Anderson
Stillwater, MN. 55082
Dear Mr. Schoene,
On behalf of Lakeview Memorial Hospital and St. Croix Valley Clinic we wish to thank
our neighbors on West Churchill and Anderson Streets for your patience and
understanding regarding our parking problem. We realize the disturbance the overflow
parking in the residential areas has caused and wish to assure you, we are looking into
resolutions.
Immediately, parking space will be added to the West of the buildings. This project
will begin in early September and provide an additional 54 parking spaces. As the
hospital and clinic grow, plans will be continually reviewed to improve and expand
parking conditions.
We apologize for any inconvenience experienced and again, appreciate your consideration
while the problem is being remedied.
Sincerely,
e� bertson-
dm s r
Lakaviia�,A
-Memorial Hospital
Yam- `
.]on Pedersen
Clinic Administrator
St. Croix Valley Clinic
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUB/90-58
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 61st and Eastridge Court
Comprehensive Plan District: Duplex Residential
Zoning District: R-B
Applicant's Name: Lawrence Rose
Type of Application: Subdivision - Final Plat.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Nineteen lot Final Plat for a portion of the Forest Ridge Addition.
DISCUSSION:
A Ana Plat for the forty two lot Forest Ridge Addition was approved by the
Council September 5, 1990. Since that time utilities and streets have been
installed but the Final Plat has not been recorded. This application is for
Final Plat approval for a portion (nineteen lots) of the original forty two
rot subdivision. All of Eastwood Court is included to coordinate access to the
lots on the west side of that street not in the First Addition as well as the
lots in the project on the east side of the street. The site borders land
zoned commercial to the south. To buffer the two uses, a solid fence and
landscaping should be installed to screen the two uses. The site has been
rough graded. A final grading plan should be submitted to show how site
drainage will be handled for the project.
The park dedication requirements for the subdivision require dedication of 9%
of the residential land (8,352 square feet) and a maximum of 7.5% of
commercial land area (8,917 square feet) for park purposes. The Comprehensive
Plan for the Brick Pond"Area show a neighborhood park located north across
61st Street. That site is owned by the applicant. It is recommended that a
portion of the land be dedicated to the City for a neighborhood park.
Although the public improvements have been constructed, the City departments
are reviewing the plans and will comment before Final Plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A solid fence and landscaping shall be installed along the south
boundary of the site before Final Plat approval.
2. A final grading and utility plan shall be submitted to accommodate site
runoff.
3. The park dedication requirement shall be met by dedication of land
across 61st street for a neighborhood park.
Plan Review - Continued
Case No. SUB/90-58
4. One tree shall be planted per lot when building permits for residences
are issued. The trees shall be planted before occupancy of residences.
5. Street lights shall be installed before Final Plat approval.
6. Comments from the City departments shall be incorporated into the Final
Plat.
ATTACHMENT: Subdivision.
�
Cn�
W
�crr
i
i
In N
N
DD N V)
rn�
nNN
V)
u Zc
s
QS'014 M„10,41eION
'or i Tr 'gas' do t/iMs a:u eo
g 8 if i *I)mS ?NJ so HNn LLr3
>N
51s z
IC'LLP N,II,fI.IN
— — •• r i 8 'OC1 YC ':3f !C YIIKS 7!IL A3Nn J53M
4
^1
IV
n I
I
of
g
F
b-
3
CL
rJ
M 11y
V
Li
I
o
S
I b0 3,9N3n1
I
96'0'C 3,.f1,
Ov'O!, 3„f1,41,1OS
'a
0 R�
F
co 4
n
' to�r
x °
a^
F
I
I
$
EI
�:allr--'Mn�
�loWIT
-
���-
-vcr.j
'us--
vY,-- ,�z ce•ec•^
�n•fa
.a+''
Ln
00
s lbnoo 3oaiblsd3
R
0
4
�
�
d
3
� s
N
h
VC3
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. PUD/90-57
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: 61st Street and Eastwood Court
Comprehensive Plan District: Duplex Residential
Zoning District: R-B Residential
Applicant's Name: Lawrence Rose
Type of Application: Planned Unit Development
Project Description:
Final approval of First Phase of Forest Ridge Planned Unit Development.
Discussion•
The original Planned Unit Development for the site was approved September 5,
1989. Since that time, street and utilities have been installed but no Final
Plat recorded or residential construction begun. The current owner of the land
would like to proceed with the project. A related subdivision (Case No.
SUB/90-58) should accompany this review.
With the existing project ownership situation, it is important for the City to
make sure that the overall project building design and improvements are
coordinated. Of particular concern is drainage/grading and building design.
A final utilities and grading plan is required as a condition of approval for
the final plat.
To assure quality compatible design of the nineteen lot attacned single family
homes, it is recommended that the Planning Commission review the site plan
and design of typical duplexes before building permits are issued. The PUD
regulations require park dedication. This requirement is addressed in the
subdivision staff report and conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The park dedication requirements shall be met before final approval.
2. The minimum building envelope lot width shall be twenty five feet with
the standard thirty foot frontyard and corner sideyard setbacks, ten
feet sideyard and twenty five rearyard.
3. Elevations for typical residential structures shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Commission before building permits are
issued.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-53
Planning Commission Meeting: September 17, 1990
Project Location: Lot east of Kangaroo Storage on Highway 36 Frontage Road.
Zoning District: BP-C, Business Park - Commercial.
Applicant's Name: Paul Pink and Associates for Bakers Square.
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Variance to setback requirements for a parking lot and variance for the number
of signs.
DISCUSSION:
The application is for a 5,640 square foot restaurant in the Business
Park -Commercial District, BP-C. The site plan shows the structure setback
thirty feet and fifty four feet two inches from the side property lines and
forty feet from the front property line. The structure meets the setback
requirements but the side parking areas do not. The Parking Ordinance requires
that parking lots be setback ten feet from the property line. The proposal has
six foot setbacks for the parking lots. The required setbacks are shown by a
dashed line on the site plan. The purpose of the parking lot setback is to
provide adequate space for sideyard landscaping. The landscape plan shows a
variety of shrubs, trees (deciduous and evergreen) and ground cover. A six
foot block wall separating the commercial use from residentially zoned land
to the rear (north). Boston Ivy will be planted along the base of the wall to
cover it in -time. Accent landscaping comprised of a variety of shrubs and
bushes is provided around the front and entrance side (east) of the structure.
Landscaped islands in the parking lot are provided to -break up and improve the
appearance of the parking lot. The landscape plans show the location of the
parking lot lighting fixtures. The lenses of the fixtures should not project
below the light cabinet. Lighting intensity to the rear of the site should be
cut off so it does not shine on the residential areas. The landscaping will
help screen the light when it grows up. The maximum light fixture height is
for private parking lots is twenty feet. A lighting plan has been submitted
that shows lighting intensity.
The site plans show the trash area located behind the building on tale west
border of the site. The letter of application indicates that the trash
enclosure shall be made of the same materials as the building. Air
conditioning and mechanical equipment shall be located on the roof of the
structure, screened by a six foot parapet wall.
The sign plan for the project show a twenty four foot tall, from frontyard
level, one hundred square foot free-standing sign and three thirty five square
foot wall signs on the east, west and north side of the building. The
free-standing sign is set back ten feet from the property line (fifteen feet
is required). The Sign Ordinance allows one sign, free-standing or wall. It is
recommended that as a possible trade off for two signs, the free-standing sign
be reduced in height and size to a monument type ground sign. With this
modification, a second sign on the east or south elevation may be acceptable.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The drive-thru shall be used for occasional use only, twenty to thirty
sales per day - not as a fast food restaurant drive-thru.
2. A. One sign shall be allowed, pole or wall sign; or
B. Two signs may be allowed, one wall sign as proposed and one monument
type free-standing sign, maximum ten feet in height, seventy five
square feet.
3. Four street trees of a species consistent with the landscape plant
material shall be planted along the Frontage Road.
4. The parking light fixture height shall be a maximum of twenty feet with
flush or recessed lens and light cutoffs at property lines no more
than 1 fc/sf.
5. All landscape shall be installed before building occupancy or June 1,
1991.
ATTACHMENT: Project plans.
t"1
to
22"6"
27
-i
N
MI
--.
1--•
O
V
m
01
ICI
N U
_
o
o,
r
X
a
X
a•+
N
1-+
G'1
Ol
1--•
►-
r
o
.�
c
a
P.
=
m
p
(A
r
X
rn
c
p
•w
It
-T+
a
o
a
tT
CD
m
p
o
�
o
�
rn
a
a
v
O
C
rn
to
R N
to N
t0 ►+
to w
V
A
c N
a A
m c
m a
z
m m
m
m m
-t rn
m
--t
mien Bakers Square
Address
City Stillwater
State MN
Y
V
co
cn
A
C
A
x
m
-n
m
m
Scale
1/411
Drawn by
SB
Salesperson
RS
Date
9-06-90
/06""
Revisions
to ;o S
CD c o m
a c x
+
x
T
Rl •--• O
x
p N R
A � b
a n
M c
m m m N
-n ..
o z
o n
(.4
N
Custortxr Approval Date
a
r
r
z
U)
0
z
Tl.�, D•.. -, is *. r.pwlr �(
Schad -tract' signs
173 M:w..c•+u A.e N. I�III E Oifl Rl I
o..,• . MN SM0,036• 5—.4, -4N' 5313% I
OUT) 367-1431 µ li 914-1421
• MAGNUSQUARE63I
[.9
A
TAP
%vow
Ughling
ORDERING INFORMATION
ARM MOUNT
I.E.S. Type
Catalog Number'
Mounting
Source & Wattage
Distribution EPA
Weight
U,= Y 111 m2
lbs. kg..
FLAT LENS
MSM-A250S-2X8-1'
Arm
H.P.S. 250
P
W
47
212 2.0
.19
MSM-A400S-2X8-1'
Arm
H P.S. 400
P
W
52
23.4 20
.19
MSM-A250H-2X8-1'
Arm
MH 250
P
W
52
23A 2.0
.19
MSM-A400H-2X8-1'
Arm
MH 400
P
W
57
25.7 2.0
.19
DROP LENS
MSM-A250S-2D8-1
Arm
H.P.S. 250
-
D
46
20.7
2.0
.19
MSM-A400S-2D8-1
Arm
H.P.S. 400
--
D
51
23.0
2,0
.19
MSM-A2501-1-2138-1
Arm
MH 250
--
D
51
23.0
2.0
.19
MSM-A400H-2D8-1
Arm
MH 400
-
D
56
25.2
2.0
.19
'For distribution type replace (X) with P-Type 11,11I. W-Type 2.
Above units are QUAD -TAP" 120. 208, 240. 277 volt. If 480V is desired change '8' to "5 . (50 Hz 220!240 volt available - consult factory.)
Above units are bronze. For other finishes change last digit from 1 to Black-2, Gray-3. While-4.
FOR CEILING MOUNT, change A to C in Catalog Logic. Example: MSM-A250S-1(X)8-1 to MSM-C250S-1(X)8-1.
YOKE MOUNT
I.E.S.
Catalog Number'
Source 6 Wattage
Distribution
EPA
Weight
R,M Y
1112
m2
lbs.
kg,.
FLAT LENS
1l1ASM-Y250S-2X8-1'
HPS 250 P
W 1
2.0
.19
65 29.3
MSM-Y400S-2X8-1'
HPS 400 P
W
20
.19
70 31.5
MSM-Y250H-2X8-1"
MH 250 P
W
2.0
19
60 27.0
MSM-Y400H-2X8-1'
MH 400 P
W
20
19
65 293
DROP LENS
MSM-Y250S-2138-1
HPS 250
-
D
20
.19
63
2114
MSM-Y400S-2D8-1
HPS 400
-
D
2.0
.19
68
30.6
MSM-Y250H-2D8-1
MH 250
D
2.0
.19
58
26.1
MSM-Y400H-2D8-1
MH 400
D
2.0
.19
63
28A
'For distribution type replace (X) with P-TypeU,III, W-Type2square.
Above units are Quad -Tap 120, 208, 240, 277 volt. It 480 volt is desired, change "8" to "5". (50 Hz. 220/240 volt available - consult factory.)
Above units are bronze. For other finishes change final digit from 1 to Black-2, Gray-3, White-4.
OPTIONS (Factory Installed.)
Suffix
Description
-F(X)
Fusing
-PC(X)
Button type photocontrol (120-277V), TWIST-LOCKIE (480V),
-P
Polycarbonale drop lens - Type 2 only.
For current fusing and photocontrol, replace (X) with: 1-120V, 2-208V, 3-240V, 4-277V, 5-480V.
ACCESSORY (Field installed - flat lens only.)
Catalog Number Description Wel hl
s. gt.
MSO-SPC Polycarbonale shield 4 1.8
CATALOG LOGIC
MSM-YT-250S-1P5-1-P
. __........ _ ..
Series- �^
T
MSM - MAGNUSQUARE'"
Series
Options
P
P - Polycarbonate Drop Lens
A -ArmMountin
A- Arm
-F(X) - Fusin (Replace X with
C -Ceiling
1- Bronze 1-120V, 2-208V, 3-240V,
1 -
Y -Yoke
l4-P77V, 5-480V
2 -Black )
Wattage
3 - Gray -PC(X) - Photocontrol (Button Type.
250
4 - While Replace (X) with: 1-120V.
400
2-208V, 3-240V, 4-277V-Twisl-
Volte Lock-5.480V)
SS - High Pressure Sodium
5 - 84 volt
H - Metal Halide
8 - Quad -Tap
(120. 20B, 240, 277V)
Ballast Type
1 - Alegulaled High Power
Factor
Beam Distribution
4 P - Type 11.1U (flat lens only)
W - Type 2, SO (IlaI lens only)
D - Type 2, SO (drop lens only)
r
MAGNUFORMOII
,'. , [ .:+'
.. � 'S-l�"`•�
♦
•ifs •+.
•�.i.
+r.'�+'�;�� :are:
.'� �•
,�fi.••
Lighting Division
Specifying Information
RCS
Available Distribution by
Field Adjustment (✓)
Weight
EPA
Type II Type 11 Type III
Type III
-amp
Standard
Cage
Catalog Number
Dlstrfbutlan
Short Medium Short
Medium
Iba
kgs
Ft'
M-
Metal Halide'
175
RCS-0175H-lP8-1"
Type Ili Medium
✓
✓ ✓ sid.
26
11.8 1.7
.16
250
RCS-0250H-1P8-1
Type III Medium
✓
✓ Posd.
28
12.7 1.7
1
.16
400
RCS-0400H-1P8-1"'
Type III Medium
✓
✓ ✓ std.
33
14.9 1.7
.16
High Pressure Sodium
100 RCS-0100S-1 P8.1
Type III Medium
✓
✓
✓
std.
25
11.3
1.7
.16
150 RCS-0150S-IP8-10
TypelllMedium
✓
✓
✓
std.
28
12.7
1.7
.16
250 RCS-0250S-1 P8-1
Type III Medium
✓
✓
✓
std.
35
15.8
1.7
.16
400 RCS-040OS-1 P8-1
Type 111 Medium
✓
✓
✓
sid.
42
18.9
1.7
.16
RCM
Available Distribution by
Field Adjustment (✓)
Weight
EPA
Type II
Type II Type Ili Type III
Type V
Lamp
Standard
Wattage
Catalog Number
Distribution
Short
Medium Short Medium
Square
lbs
kgs
Ft'
M�
Metal Halide'
400 1 RCM-0400H-2P8-1
Type III Medium
I ✓
✓
✓
std. -
46
20.7
2 7 25
400 RCM-0400H-2W8-1
Type V Square
-
-
-
- sid.
46
20.7
2.7 .25
High Pressure Sodium
;250
RCM-0250S-2P8-1 Type III Medium
✓
✓
✓
aid.
51 23.1
2.7
,25
250
RCM-0250S-2W8-1 Type V Square
-
-
-
-
std,
51 23.1
2.7
.25
400
RCM-0400S-2P8.1 Type III Medium
✓
I
✓
✓
std.
-
56 25.4
2.7
.25
400
RCM-0400S-2W8-1 Type V Square
-
-
-
-
std.
56 25.4
2.7
25
RCL
Available Distribution by
Field Adjustment (✓)
Weight
EPA
Type II Type II
Type III
Type III
Type V
Lamp
Standard
Wattage
Catalog Number
Distribution
Short Medium
Short
Medium
Square
lbs
kgs
Ft� M'
Metal Halide'
1"
RCL-1000H-1G8-1
Type II Medium
std.
-
-
58
26.3 2.7
.25
1000
RCL-1000H 1P8 1
Type III Medium
--
-
std.
-
58
26.3 2.7
J,..25gh Pressure Sodium
1000RCL-1000S-lG8-1
Type II Medium
std
-
62
28.1 2.7
1000
RCL-1000S-1 P8-1
Type III Medium -1.
-
std.
-
62
28.1 2.7
Luminaire finish Is bronza For alternate finish substitute correct linal dig it of catalog number: black-2, gray-3, while-4.
To specify 4W volt ballast, substitute a 5 for the Bin catalog number. (50hz, 220/240V available -consult factory)
Mercury Vapor lambEt may he operated on metal halide ballast
" MUSS use universal W ruing lamp
e Must use ANSI S55 volt lamp
•"Shipped v41h [amp
RCJ
Forward
Weight
EPA
Lamp
Throw
Wamgs
Catalog Number
Distribution
lbs.
kg&
Ft'
M'
Metal Halide'
175
RCJ-0175H-lT8-1"
Type IV
27
12.2
1.F
250
RCJ-0250H-1T8-1
Type
30
13.6
1.400
RCJ-0400H-1T8-1"'
Type IV
33
14.9
1.
High Pressure Sodium
150
RCJ-0150S-1T8-1A
Type IV
28
12.7 1.7
.16
250
RCJ-0250S-lTB-1
Type IV
31
14.0 1.7
.16
400
RCJ-0400S-1T8-1
Type IV
36
16.2 1 7
.16
RCT
Lamp
Wattage
Catalog Number
Forward
Throw
Distribution
Weight
EPA
Ibs
kgs.
Metal Halide'
400
1000
1 RCT-0400H-1T8-1
RCT-1000H-1T8-1
Type IV
Type IV
42
49
19.1
22.2
2.7
2.7
25
.25
High Pressure Sodium
4011
1000
RCT-0400S -IT 8-1
RCT-1000S-1T8-1
Type IV 42
Type IV 62
19.1
28.1
2.7
2.7J
rnaire finish is bmnza For alternate finish substitute correct final dlgil of Waft
me black-2, gray-3.whita-4,
;pecily 48(3w11 bal]asC s�ubvitute a 5 for the 8 in cala log number, (50hz, 22=40V
avei ebl!,t4=sutl factory.) - -
Mercury Vapor lamps may be operated on metal halide ballast
"Must use universal burning lamp
A Must use ANSI S55 volt lamp
''Shipped vAlh lamp
a
DIMENSIONAL DATA
RCS
RCM
RCL
A
161/4"
221/2'
22W
413 mm
572 mm
572 mm
B
231h"
30 /4"
30 h"
591 mm
768 mm
768 mm
C
6"
10'
10"
203 mm
254 mm
254 mm
DIMENSIONAL DATA
RCJ
RCT
A
161/4'
22 h"
413 mm
572 mm
B
23 /4"
30 /4"
591 mm
768 mm
C
8"
10"
203 mm
254 mm
4
SITE LOCATION MAP
SITE AREA: 66,048 S.F. — 1.52 ACRES
(EXCLUDING R/W)
RESTAURANT: TOTAL GFA 6,640 S.F.
PARKING REQUIRED:
1 SPACE/100 S.F. G.FA 56 SPACES
PARKING PROVIDED . - 100 SPACES
0 20, 40' 100'
H
MEN
Paul Pink and
Associates, Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
426 00 0—a •h..1
Mw.r.00" Mr'6403 3200
rtr•871•5111/6
1 h—by ewll/r 1h.I IN. pw...y--ft- %
Mw'/ww 1 1. b7Iun.
. p•r1...tl IA..r M Iw.
11 M
Q4galer
n1 r6lrllrrl rl u.el Hla
D.ft r-n�o
or... by: PN
CMdM by:
SHEET TITLE
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
SHEET W MEER:
J{
co.�/�
❑
•"/
z
ci
m
Z
n
Q
w
W
x
''irt
v
• W
U
T
2
L
2Q
Y
Z
D
Pl'e ant rl_ � r A.. uy LIIJ -VLJUrjLN—
et T a r v i7 rws.
0 20' 40' 100'
MEN.
Paul Pink and
Associates, Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
.26 Dd O.o••'Slr••1
W—p"...rl S54M 2200
612•471.561!
I M�•61.w1i111M11.�1 VM •.•.rKwgM1
.•pwl ....�ro•,•a ti ... a ray �•I
e.•c1 wo•� •�•n. •^a n.w i wry . M
.•yal•� a ,�HltaYre-�C w...� w.lw•
a 1.. 1•u er .c l.�vKl70TA
wafer
1.1 1111111.11 •I ■1..1111.
Gomml..lon No 00730-1
D.1• 0-12-90
Dr... b.
CMc1.0 b1
R.•I.lorr I N. I D.1.
SHEET TITLE:
GRADING, DRAINAGE
UTILITY PLAN
&MET NUMBER:
OFFICE II RECEIVING
.. .. --- — �j MECHANICAL
MECHANICAL ROOM
NOT INCLUDED IN
FLOOR AREA TOTALS
N 0 0 WOMEN 'v----
0 0 I
COOLER
i L---' PREPARATION
RESTROOMS NOT
INCLUDED IN FLOOR
AREA TOTAL/
DISHWASHING FREEZER
I
I KITCHEN
r 1
TOTAL KITCHEN AREA - 2,140 Si.
zmI
TRAINING
- — — _j
SERVING AREA
CASHIER AREA NOT INCLUDED
IN FLOOR AREA TOTALS
I I CASHIER
BCALE 1/4' a 1'-0'
33 STATION
B S'- 0'
DINING AREA
TOTAL DINING AREA - 8,812 Sr.
DL- WAITING
VESTIBULE
CONVENIENCE
WINDOW
Paul Pink and
Associates. Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
428 Oak Oro.. Sb..1
r. YY+o.e.. MN 88403 2200
81u•lr1•/11s
1 . b, c.rIK. W.11%1. W-, I—Ifkmim
M r.pW w. p—mod by 1 u > 11r10.1 mlr
6rK1 wpw�+on .nA Ih.l 1 Yn . AAl
I.yH«►f ✓Wi Is. Iw.
v o...t.I..[
BAUDC!
SQUARE
4gaiter
T1/ /11 t.p1.11 .t .I111111•
003 0-1
D.1. 8-8-80
Dr— by:
CNKM.d by:
SHEET TITLE:
FLOOR PLAN
SHEET N!"BER:
I
i !0' BAKERS SQUARE'
F:E-STA—'t; 1hIT _P�lE�9�
KALE 1/4' . V-O'
i
i HIGII PAKArej
w N
NA6
tl?u, rANcu
MEN
Paul Pink and
Associates. Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
ua D.k Or"* Strw
W.r..o.w. ►N 66400 .1i00
61:-671.54 u
1 0..96.-101 IMI MI. IW-..MCMW110A
�w ti d .y r.r p wW.r my
e.«i ..a.•-�bn w
rpir�«p wwS.� IM Iw•
✓.M aliMM
L
BAMDQ
-SQU RE:
lj ater
.., ,, .r.....�. i
C...r..j« N.. 90700-1
Date •-4-90
Dr..n by: '�fs
Ch.aw by:
I
SHEET TITLE I
NORTH & EAST
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
SHEET WMBEIC
5
sot
SCA
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE 1/4' - V-0'
Paul Pink and
Associates. Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
Ore 0.6 or.v. ea...
+a1+.9d1W4 FIN sawn aae0
612yyt•/elf
MrMy -=Y Ih" tnl. pl.n, .v.cHlulor.
w r.gerf .a vr.v.r.6 Dv m. a Y " my
Alr.cl rr..rm an rd IMI I .m. dA
rpillwµ -dw IM I—.
.. �. I..F M..
BnMRs
SQUARE
Qigcaa ter
tu...T.....a a a..1..ra
Data 9-4-80
Dr— by: PO
Cn«..a by:
SHEET TITLE
SOUTH 3 WEST
BUILDING ELEVAT)ONS
SHEET NUMBER:
A�101111111111
412.32'
Li••�0�
P A
•� •R •\•n
n •+•
ri
:
A :
A
A
l♦i
• h
�
• n
rl
•NT•
:
.s
h ri
rqqi
0
ri ri
• F
h
••N
: ri
ri
e
ri
ri
•n • M •�
' ri i a ri 1{.I .i
ri i
ri Y
.r- »
/rid�
'.1—wF-
• r
• f • N
• w
• f
1riy
• ■ O
• r
• N
• w
• w
• A • r
M N
• r
M
/ m • n
w
•
• h
N
N"
• • • ■N• 2 • •
+ +_ w w N �" r
O •
I �
• a ► N i
� �
ri A
A
N N
w
N
N
M A
'P
N
N
N
N
w
N
N
Y
N
N N
A
m
•1
A
ti
.1
•i
• •s 0 .: .m .s
w=
a� - _ 1+-
• ,� ■ A
A
• h
j
M
• h
A
N
► tl
N
N
• h
• � • f
.: i�
J
• m
1 A
• h
` N
r
• n
ai
(•y�
• O
N
h
• h
N
I
• r
.i
•
yy
• • f
N
r
n
N
h
• F
N
r
• h
m
•
m
N
h
1n� F ' F F P ry
• � P � .��"j w,3 ��1{V
r i, i i n i n ri
-.
f
r
:n •s
.e
•ei
s
.ra7
•► =
♦n
v
�
•ri
•..
,J
■
• •�
m
•�i
•n
.
I
.: •h
•N
.�
s
�
�
.^
.Y
:^
:�"
� �� i Jig �
.n •r♦•
•i
•i
•w
.
•
•�i
A
n
•m
•�
A
•s •
• a
N
�
A
•i
.1
•t
f
•�i
—n--.�-
•i
i
M
.I � �t
ff
• n • P
ryry
•.1
♦
yy
•r6 •
N N
•�
N
•
M
•
• 4
Y +
N
N
9
N
N
• r
N
• N
N
H
•P •
N N
•
N
•w .Fj
A A
I
A
r�11
• •1�
■ N
•N
• r
r
I
+
I
11
r
O
•`a
•�
•9 •i
•�
•W
N
+_ ■
N N
N
•:
N
•$
-
.•°
•« •�
N N
•n
A
6.1 •n
:
•a
n
•n •:
Ay/
.oh
fy
•Y
•rh
no
A
•
Iw
• F •
• r
N Y
• N • A
-
■ N
• N
. IF'1 • r
A
• +
A
•
A
• N
A
•
• P • B
}i
• !
A
p♦p�
• P • F
A :
• J
♦�f
• O • n
r�
■ p
n
•
f
P
N
• 1
"'
• •
■
•
• nf
.fir
:
a
r
h
A
w
oo
• B:
.+Nu
h
J
•f
.a
W�
••
•
IYI
■
PN
•m
A
w
FA
Nf
•u
A
e
r:
•n
A
♦
F:
•n
A
AF
•o
ri
a
A.1
•�
i
r
F F r F N r 1J
r
A A 0; A :
•9 •+ ►i n •n 4n
d d : ri A i i �ri n j'z
r n J a
N
n
.�
w
f
rw Fl
A Nf MN
•i •n
A A .i
.•
�_��
�T
+
ti a
m
♦
�•
+ a
_N
--
— _
--
N
:
1� Y : ■i N_ ai N N A � �
A A—�.:
0 20' 40' 100'
N
cl0
SI
W
V
W
w
K
w
z
z
0
1
r
Paul Pink and
Associates. Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
425 O•. Oro•• 81r••1
N♦•mr•al• 1N 66403 3260
61f•6rl-1216
l lur•41 [r Ir1. mm 11.11Irr yCrIKNwR
r r•p•rl w•• •r•/rN O. �. w vnMr rrrl
FKI•.Vr^•'••rJ II.N 1•T• 9
•1 M •1N• N ,
WN ___ •H Ir• �__ _
R.L. FEIG & ASSOCIATES. M
CONSULTING ENGMlEERS
9740 IRVING AVE $0. '
BLOOM1NOTOK MK 66"1
(612) W-4276
BnMDQ
SQUARE
j r411ter
1/• •Ir1rlll l! /1 •1•+1rr 11
C•arrNWF No D0330-1
D•1• 6-26-60
CA•[••• by: -
IM♦1•bn•: I No. I D•1•
SHEET TITLE:
LIGHTING PLAN -
SHEET NUMBER:
0
h
3I
+'-o MMw�PL
` I KI�• WM+
IS Ivy
a •i
r
Z r
w 1 _
i ]A
NOTES
ANT §QHEDULE
1. At S03 AREAS, PLA NY, NG 0ED$ AND PLANTERS ARE TO BE IRRIGATED' `-
- UK GrrY U COMMON hAMIE
S l F4MAMM "
WITH 100 PERCENT COVERAGE. SELECTION OF A OUALIFIC❑ IRRIGATIO
,� F � �•, •,�• �y,N, I,,,, W'/ kw,•, N. �m
- 'At•y
� •+•++ - •�` uy�" i . .
CONTRACTOR SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
•t -
`I
FU } .2 a.sGriwa. wwmss ncwrs'werr.r•: / r.w�n. +wYu+ew _.:.
` 9w
'•"+'' "". f
A. a B TREES AND SITYTUAR 69 E GALLED AND SL1Rl Al EA.I
is _ ; i .:: ! Yr 1. Ww«w 'w.Iw �r A� / Ir.w• ww* 1+ a�� - w
".. iY•Sr _
-�t.. r� -- - -
-.�. * r .a.•.c A�Pta' -� � •~
'- E � - --r•.*M;Ij .r. •
-
�� • - �'
3. NO PLANTING WILL gE INSTALLCO UNTIL ALL GRADING
"•
1< IMAµA 'slw+.•A-AW /4•r •N7rA.-I A1A+tl Rr+,rsa,y, rJN _... --
WW,-.+.+n.. j AAj
:4►'Aa
", 'yrpc.•M.J
`- '•;
CONSTRUCTION 11AS Be EN COMPLETED IN 1MAf EDIATE AREA,
T
!
�"►�+'sw Er.�rr,vr fir.. vawoaw rLPVA +. rr.►
;" 1."."
' 1 ;11 +►
SrrrY+wJ_. ..
4. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL LLiiLIT'IES ON PROPERTY.
_I .
.;� ;lR. J t I e•rr...A Fwwr'k� J�h-w�/.k t� TPm uv'4., - - -;
_ I r'nO
IVM Ww '...
S. IF THERE IS R DISCREPANCY AETWEEN THE NUMOCR OP PLANTS SHOWN
ON THE PLAN ANO THC NUI.IBER OF PLANTS SHO'NN IN PLANT LIST•,
I. 00Tom- AVM #L-cA Plrrr+`n.'DL^c -. ww sroam. � �'�
od Wf•' - .- ,Arr'Irl.r f. "�''�`F "A1 wF1"k+ ad D& __ .
1.7 so w 40140 -
_r-.s.n. "+"' •'+' WNI-v •• -- .. ..
NUMBER OF PLANTS ¢FIOWN ON FLAN VOLL TAKE P7iErc,, oEW-s
`; MJ _.I_-T .�; _ ✓+►..fawt 1Wr.+•+Th.� •iAlar�i' % 1t n1Ys Jw,PIf+L
=� 0 .lu. �_y.F fi' f/t•Ms
i
WITH THE 'OF•TH
'•j � �' liwl..w•.•sr�'sw•dM••11+1'!1M {•PrfrJ•JW++iM.._.-'__
M"-y_I11b,W w"Opw
d
E. ALL MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY LATEST ECNTTON
AMERIC At? STA NOARD FOR NURSERY STOCK- AM FRICAN ASSOCIATION O}
--'A.wrlrll►.Ts
'1 Ty _ s _-_ ... 'T7••n+L • +'Vr`A''IMvfJM'J Yf►Af �j
;IS'NT
I
!kA IT_ v.rns "*u.nrr.J wnf'/ WPmb j W..ri_A+rwM:�
NURSERYMEN.
"'ptov
-. ` H ,--�� An�IN � - ��'� j.�Y kKA� l.Mr'✓M1�HL�--._.. .f+ Rrr —
7, REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO ",OPERTY FROIA PL"M. gPEM-0 SAT Hp[
COST TO TriE OWNER. I..
Ik
�•
Pew wrr<w+�
%Tna.+ I POOO,2 wwr I/ d~n om w~
-• f • •- -
GVARANTEENEW PLANT AATE RIALTNROUGHONECALENAARYEARFRO N
r•: .yam--'.7L,
•_.....� , WW16d0 fiV % .. .. _ _..:" _
- .H•� ...
TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE.,
_... _
R1ftA. �,lJ•I'iA•Allmf�l'siil Pf•wMM-',laTtW :.T.�-�W.1Lµ�If1YN 11P� 1b'
TE
'a. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL eE LOCAD CAREFULLYAS SHOWN O
/Is
d
•K - _ �. " +P'' �'�"" •B� ^'� w%�'
' '
�'rw
THE PLANS. ." _ ,• . •_
_ CAA•.
It. %•« dkr kgfr A avvy", A' / 4mft" ar A- rNF cL
S•1/ Rr ..
412.32'
•
A•r
_
_`
a
__
+'
_
� •
_
`tires
S Ty
im
1 Wf 1kJ * '. I YK.
t
j �♦
Cri
1
+x;
19;a R.
k*
jaf
� Rut,
rJ
L/LISYINO•�-1PJIL
••r 4p
.
_
.QYSa+
-
DEPTH OF XAIti -q
'
.rwcrwe ra.rAa
1 tc m.c .l.rl■
r.-
.IG
COPVYT.&-�I
ROCK 0!"3-
.an.•Iwr .'
fIL7
-
1,�.G �•r.; -•jl
PLANTING SOIL 1/3 PEfti
.5�
j w.cow P.vr.Iar
p„yA
2/3 TOPSOIL AND FERTLI2[
WITH 12 12:12_
�' I •., T. i h
;.
• }
►Runk
— I
i SHRUB�PLANTkJG
,
_:•TYPICAL
�.o nl.tll loa
•n,� a .us. r...r
..•a f.a rar u 1 -
M .I.wY .. A•14
AMA
bi
0 f0' 40' 100' -
.rTF T.aa Tt
"r,.o.
PLW
r�,I
PKA-M1a
I
-
DECIDUOUS'fREE RANTING DES — I '
TREE PLANING MAIL
cry n ►le$QWY SCREEN WALL DETAIL
-
_
_
:CONFEAOUS
H
'K_ . I•
_
Paul Pink and
Associates. Inc.
ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
INTERIOR DESIGNERS
.28 O.A Ur.r. 81-1
612-//1-9619
1
I
,
I
1 I.P I — 1..111 d y rp.cllKNwl
npwl ... P..•...d er •» a .r•d.r ..,
01
.w.•..o, .,w sn.i
�.f�.l.�.a w._.w�in.r w•.., u. Iw•
N M •I.MN M•'.wM•rw
M.t-4 9-4..---,As�A
I. Jr.14.
ALAN KRETMA ASSOCIATES, NC.
Bias
SQUARE..
l ovater.�dz-i�N
cwnnl •.1«I la. soaao-•1 '
D.I• __ 8-4-90 .---
Dr.- by: AKCW.J
C,vc1.d by:
SHEET TITLE:
ANDSCAPEPLAN.
i
SHEET gUMSER:
I
r
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/90-59
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: September 17, 1990
PROJECT LOCATION: 2527 Interlachen Drive
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Single Family ZONING DISTRICT: RA
APPLICANT'S NAME: Thomas and Debra Odell
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Resubdivision.
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS:
A Special Use Permit to conduct a small office business in a residential area.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to conduct a small office business out of an existing
residential home in a single family neighborhood. The use is a non -re tail. The
applicants have stated they have one employee who does not reside in the home.
There is parking on site to accommodate an additional car considering the
owners of the home presently have three or less cars.
The City Planning Department was notified that this office business has been
conducted without a use permit this summer. The attached letter to the
applicants explains the visit made by City Staff in early August.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. All parking shall remain on -site.
2. Deliveries outside normal mail deliveries are limited to three per
week.
3. No customers are allowed at the home.
4. There shall be no business sign on the site.
RECOMMENDATION: Determination of request.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use is not injurious to the neighborhood if the conditions are
met.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Application Form.
- Letter to applicants from Mr. Russell.
Lase Numoer
r�
o Col_ _
Fee Paid
Date Filed
PLANNING ADMINIS i IRAi IVE FOIRM
Street Location of Property: c�]_4��1�r����'�_______________
Legal Description of Properly: --------------
owner: Name __ .�� �_ 1--------------------------
Ac! a55 J 1 Y �0.� �_� v Phone: L13c 9 `133
Appliccnt (if other than owner): Name ---------------------------------
Address ------------------------------ Phone: ---------------
Type of Recluest:, ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
__. Special Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
Variance ___ Other -------------------
Description of Request:
1041L
_aLQ4_'�_-----------------
G�f� .
Signature or Applicant: _ �_____________
Date of Public Hearing:
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back o; this form or at-
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. 1.6 SEP 1.9C -
1 3. Dimensions of front and side sel.-backs.
v �
g Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street nar..es. v,-y�OFSTV_:
6. Location of adjacent e-xisting buildings. N.rtdR; "
7. Other information as may be requested. c3ry' �v7 67/
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the 'Planning Commission on ________;�'° a'c;e)
subject to the following conditions: ____________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on to the _.
following conditions: ------- -----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Comments. (Use other side), '
.ter
r+ � a
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
August 9, 1990
Debbie Odell
Rainbow Printing and Promotions Company
2527 Interlachen Drive
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Debbie:
This letter is written to confirm what I went over with you
on Monday, August 6, 1990. A review of City planning files
indicates that we have not received an application for a
Special Use Permit to use the residence at 2527 Interlachen
Drive as a business. The current use of the residence is
illegal without a Special Use Permit. At this time, you are
not allowed to operate a business at your residence.
When I visited the site Monday there were six cars parked
in the driveway and on the street. I have also received
complaints about the operation from your neighbors.
Enclosed is an application for a home occupation Special
Use Permit. The filing fee is $70.00. Until you receive
City approval, you cannot operate your business from this
residence.
Sin erely,
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Enclosure: Application Form.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121