Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-08-21 HPC Packet AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North August 21, 2019 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of July 17th, 2019 regular meeting IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Case No. 2019-20: Consideration a Design Permit for a multi-tenant sign plan and associated signage for 610 Main Street North in the Downtown Design Review District. Alyssa Aguilera, applicant. Mike Bergum, property owner. VI. PUBLIC HEARING 3. Case No. 2019-03/19: Consideration of the designation of 615 Broadway Street South as a heritage preservation site. Reid and Julie Miller, property owners. 4. Case No. 2019-17: Consideration of a Design Permit for an infill home to be located at 615 Broadway St S in the Neighborhood Conservation District. Reid and Julie Miller, property owners. VII. UNFINSHIED BUSINESS 5. Case No. 2019-18: Consideration of a Design Permit for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project. City of Stillwater, property owner and applicant. VIII. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS 5. 2019 Workplan Update and 2020 Workplan Outline 6. 2019 Preserve MN Conference (September 11-13th) – Confirmation Requested IX. FYI 7. 2019-2022 Grant Updates – No Packet Materials 8. Heirloom Homes and Landmark Sites Website – No Packet Materials 9. WA County Historical Society future Heritage Center X. ADJOURNMENT HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING July 17, 2019 7:00 P.M. Chairwoman Mino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Mino, Commissioners Finwall, Larson, Steinwall, Thueson, Walls, Council Representative Junker (left at 8:25 p.m.) Absent: Commissioner Krakowski Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of June 19, 2019 Motion by Commissioner Thueson, seconded by Commissioner Finwall, to approve the minutes of the June 19, 2019 meeting. All in favor, 6-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA There were no items on the Consent Agenda. PUBLIC HEARING There were no public hearings. NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2019-18: Consideration of a Design Permit for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project. City of Stillwater, property owner and applicant. City Planner Wittman explained that the City of Stillwater will be conducting a riverbank restoration project between Nelson Street East and the southern City limit. The purpose of the project is to stabilize the shoreline and provide a riverwalk separating users to provide pedestrian safety in an area where there is significant pedestrian, cyclist, and vehicular congestion. As part of the project, the City intends to construct a Riverwalk from Nelson Street East, at the end of the existing levee wall, to the Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse. The project boundaries extend along the St. Croix River shoreline for nearly three-quarters of a mile. Extending from the southeastern edge of the Stillwater Commercial Historic District, approximately one-third of the project is located in the Downtown Design Review District. Connecting with the Army Corps of Engineers levee wall at Nelson Street East, the walkway will consist of a pile wall to accommodate a 10’ wide concrete walkway. The riverside of the walkway will separate users with a black pipe rail fence to match the existing MnDOT-installed railing in this location. Riverside riprap will remain and new riprap with vegetation will be installed to an elevation of 684’. The wall will carry along the river, around the Dock Café. From this point to the Shoddy Mill and Warehouse site, the 10’ pedestrian at-grade walkway will continue alongside the Loop Trail with vegetated riprap below. Three concrete overlooks will be installed. The first of the overlooks will be located at the St. Croix Boat and Packet loading dock. The primary purpose of this overlook is to provide for pedestrian loading and unloading in an area that is off both the street and the Riverwalk. A secondary function of the overlook is to connect existing and future gangways. The other two overlooks will be over existing stormwater outlets in Bridgeview Park. Details of Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 17, 2019 Page 2 of 5 the concrete finish have not been submitted to the City. The Commission is asked to determine whether the shoreline restoration project will impact the South Main Archaeological District and/or the Cultural Landscape District. Neither of these districts has been nationally listed but both are eligible. The site is well documented and has been significantly surveyed over the last several decades. The shoreline has been extended out from where it originally was, with mainly sawdust fill. The improvement will occur right along the shoreline edge, quite a distance away from the known historic resources which are mainly foundations associated with the former milling operation. The reason the archaeological district extends to the river is that the river was the eastern boundary of the activities that occurred, but it is not clear exactly where the river line was. Staff has determined that the proposed project will be in conformance with previously approved plans and will not negatively impact historical, cultural and archaeological resources. Therefore, staff recommends conditional approval. Chairman Mino asked, are there contingency plans if additional historic resources are discovered during the course of the project? City Planner Wittman said that is something this Commission would discuss. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the Army Corps of Engineers may have additional requirements, but the restoration project will be bringing in fill, so it is more likely that resources could potentially be covered rather than exposed. Councilmember Junker remarked that in the area from the Dock Cafe to the Bergstein Building, over a foot and a half of land has been lost to high water erosion since the trail was put in, so it is an absolute must to shore up the area. As the City continues working on Bridgeview Park, this will bring more exposure to existing archaeological findings. He would like to see signage and pictures indicating what was there historically. Commissioner Steinwall said the Commission may wish to consider building in some protection of existing resources from graffiti and vandalism, for instance, fencing or some means of protection. Ms. Wittman responded that the riverbank restoration won’t be near those areas, but the HPC could put this on an agenda to discuss the opportunities and constraints associated with this site in regard to a protection and interpretation plan for the mill ruins. Commissioner Larson asked, does the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or the National Park Service (NPS) review the plans? Ms. Wittman said the DNR has already reviewed the project. The Army Corps of Engineers reviewed it and is determining right now whether they will require any sort of 106 review or mitigation. The SHPO also will review it. Commissioner Larson asked how will bikes and pedestrians be separated? Ms. Wittman replied that the walkway portion will be for pedestrians. Signage has yet to be determined. There is a vehicular roadway through there, so part of the plan is to get pedestrians off the trail. Councilmember Junker added that there are 100 parking spots just south of the St. Croix Boat & Packet ticket office, so there will always be cars there. The area between the parking spaces and the shoreline will be widened. The shoreline will be expanded to the east which will put the cars further west from the trail, but it is yet to be determined if bikes will be allowed on the trail or if it will be strictly pedestrians. Commissioner Larson asked about the wall along the trail. He thinks it should be made to look as much like the existing wall as possible. This could be made a condition of approval. Ms. Wittman replied it will be a concrete wall. The DNR has requested the concrete on the overlooks be stained brown. The existing Army Corps of Engineers wall is concrete. Commissioner Finwall asked about the rip rap. It may a good opportunity to do something more naturalized, but if the intent is to stabilize the shore, she is OK with it. She would like to see the landscaping plans. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 17, 2019 Page 3 of 5 Ms. Wittman noted that the City has a very limited 10-12 foot easement right along the shoreline there. The City has landscaping plans but they were not included in the packet because the HPC is concerned with historic and cultural resources, not landscaping. Commissioner Larson said he is pleased the project is being done. He feels the biggest impact will be the overlooks, which will be very visible. The overlook servicing the docks is unique from the other two. As depicted, they seem highway-scale heavy and should be designed to sit more lightly on the river. He would like to see alternative designs that celebrate the river. Councilmember Junker commented that in the renderings, it’s hard to determine where the river level will be and how high the structures will be. Commissioner Larson added that if the overlook structures are fairly concealed by the water most of the time, they would be less visible and blend into the landscape and the river. If they are going to sit up high, then something special should be done with the design. Commissioner Finwall said that is why it would be helpful to see some landscaping detail. Chairman Mino commented that plans for interpretive elements along this entire area should be running parallel to these planning efforts. She would like to see plans for how to address resources that are discovered in the course of the project. Commissioner Steinwall agreed that the HPC should discuss how to identify, protect and segregate any additional historic resources that may be discovered in the course of developing the project. This could be a condition of approval. Ms. Wittman said the plans all show an elevation difference from land to ordinary high water (680’) of 15’ or less. The plans are at a fairly complete stage, so if the HPC has alterations then they should be stated very specifically. Commissioner Finwall remarked it would be beneficial to see landscaping plans. ie in front of the Dock Cafe and around the overlooks in regard to addressing the cultural landscape. Ms. Wittman replied there will be no landscaping in front of the Dock Cafe because that is private property. The City has a 10’ trail easement but does not own the land. There is existing rip rap in that location. Landscaping near the overlooks will all be grasses. The cultural landscape district is a very large area extending across the river. Councilmember Junker reminded the Commission that all the work will be done east of the current trail right along the shoreline. The land along the Dock Cafe is all fill that was not there historically. Chairman Mino suggested possible conditions of approval could be that the wall should mirror the 1930s Army Corps wall, and that the currently identified historic resources within the area will be protected should any of the work affect them. And that the work will not negatively impact the identified national register- eligible historic districts. Ms. Wittman said that the impact is up to the HPC to determine. She asked what does the HPC need from the applicant, the City, and the engineers to make that determination. Commissioner Finwall answered she would like to see the landscape plans. Commissioner Larson said he would need detailed information on grades, with water elevation high and low, to understand how much of the wall as currently designed would be exposed to view. If it looks like what has been presented, he would like to see alternative designs that are less bulky and massive, that either fit into the landscape or sit lightly upon the landscape. As currently seen the overlooks are visually distracting. They could be mistaken for barge moorings. Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Finwall, to table Case No. 2019-18, Design Permit for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project to address the information discussed. Commissioner Larson suggested that if a condition of approval is that the new retaining wall match the existing Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 17, 2019 Page 4 of 5 wall, he would like to know what that new retaining wall would look like because the rendering doesn’t look like what is being described. Commissioner Finwall asked, does the HPC want to add something about doing a separate process for historical educational components? Chairman Mino reminded the Commission the motion is to table. The HPC can still discuss if there is additional info they would like to request. Commissioner Steinwall acknowledged that the City wants to move this project forward and much of what has been discussed could be folded into conditions of approval that would potentially allow the City to go forward with the only question mark being the visual impact to the river of the overlooks. As a condition of approval, the HPC could request a contingency plan, conditioning the approval based on having the color of the levy walls match the wall at the north end of the riverwalk. With respect to the overlooks, the HPC probably has insufficient information at the moment. Commissioner Finwall asked, could the HPC approve most of the project but ask for the overlooks to come back? Ms. Wittman stated the project was hoped to be out to bid in September. The project still hasn’t made it through Army Corps of Engineers or SHPO review. SHPO has stated they won’t comment until the HPC has commented. Commissioner Finwall stated she is fine moving ahead but wondered if the HPC would like to add the educational signage component. Ms. Wittman replied that should not be part of this process, it may be a recommendation to the Council to look at an interpretative plan perhaps in next year’s work plan. Commissioner Larson agreed the signage and educational elements should be addressed in a different way than attaching it to this civil engineering project. Commissioner Finwall responded that if it helps meet the intent of the cultural landscape district, it should fall under this funding package. Ms. Wittman stated the funding is for the riverwalk. Chairman Mino stated if it’s not part of this plan and the HPC doesn’t make it a condition of this part of the project, it should be part of the plans going forward. Ms. Wittman said she has made a note to bring appropriate interpretative elements back before the Commission when work plans are discussed. Commissioner Larson asked, if the HPC approves the project with conditions, can the approval be with the exception of the design of the overlooks? Ms. Wittman replied if there’s an element of the plan that needs to come back before the HPC, it makes sense to table it because the project will not move forward until the plans are complete. Commissioner Larson noted he won’t be at the August HPC meeting. He reiterated that he would like to see something that either fits into the landscape better or sits more lightly and looks less massive. Ms. Wittman stated that Commission Larson can review the materials and provide comments in writing that can be included in the future discussion. All in favor, 6-0. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS Demolition Review Ms. Wittman stated that she is starting to review the demolition ordinance, however current planning has taken over the department’s time. She invited the Commissioners to call with their thoughts. The existing demolition ordinance is choppy and cumbersome to applicants and needs to be revised. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 17, 2019 Page 5 of 5 Recent Projects Ms. Wittman reported on recent cases. The Miller demolition at 615 Broadway Street South will be discussed in a public hearing at the next HPC meeting. Regarding 116 Harriet Street South, the Council voted 2-1 to move forward with a designation study which has just started. FYI The Saga of the Stillwater Lift Bridge Ms. Wittman stated that as part of the river crossing mitigation, MnDOT published a book about the historic lift bridge. She distributed copies. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Finwall to adjourn. All in favor, 6-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:43 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink, Recording Secretary PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-20 REPORT DATE: August 13, 2019 MEETING DATE: August 21, 2019 APPLICANT: Aylssa Aguilera, representing Edward Jones LANDOWNER: Mike Bergum, representing Prime Commercial LLC REQUEST: Approval of a Design Permit for a multi-tenant sign plan for 610 Main Street North and Approval of a 1.75’ tall by 11.5’, 20 square foot, wall- mounted sign. LOCATION: 610 Main Street North #100 DESIGNATION: N/A DISTRICT: Downtown Design Review District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION Edward Jones would like to install a pin-mounted mounted wall sign above their first-floor tenant space at 610 Main Street North, unit #100, a space that has been converted to multi-tenant use since the construction of the building. As the unit space had not been multi-tenant, no multi- tenant sign plan exists. SPECIFIC REQUEST a) Approval of a Design Permit for a multi-tenant sign plan for 610 Main Street North; and b) Approval of a 1.75’ tall by 11.5’, 20 square foot, wall-mounted sign to read “Edward Jones” in black, formed plastic lettering. ANALYSIS The multi-tenant sign plan conforms to the City Zoning Code, allowing one square footage of signage for every one linear foot of building fronting a street. The property may have 70 square feet of signage on each Main Street and the Terra Springs common area. Case no. 2019-20 Page 2 A total of four wall signs, not to exceed 20 square feet each, are proposed to be located above each of the unit’s set of windows. Unit two, on the corner, will be eligible for two, 20 square foot signs though the applicant has indicated no signage is proposed for this unit at this time. While the multi-tenant sign plan is minimal, it fulfills the basic requirements for allotment of total signage to multiple tenants. However, to help ensure design consistency on this building and to conform to the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, only black, pin-mounted lettering (ideally in the same font) should be permissible. If this condition of approval was made, then the proposed Edward Jones signage would be consistent with the approved sign plan. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: A. Approve the requested Design Permit with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed according to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, unless specifically modified by other conditions of approval. 2. All new signage shall obtain a Design Permit to ensure conformance to the City Code, Downtown Design Review District Design Guidelines, and to this multi- tenant sign plan. 3. All new signage shall be black, pin-mounted lettering. Lettering style should not contrast with existing tenant signage. 4. A sign permit shall be obtained prior to the installation of new signage. B. Deny the requested Design Permit. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that, with certain conditions, the proposed request conforms to the City Code and relevant Downtown Design Review District guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends conditional approval of the multi-tenant sign plan and associated Edward Jones signage for the building at 610 Main Street South Attachments: Zoning & location map Site plan of proposed garage Site plan of recommended garage location Application materials cc: Aylssa Aguilera Mike Bergum 610 Main Street North Multi-tenant Sign Plan Each tenant space, as shown above, shall be permitted to have a maximum 20 square feet of signage. 1 2a 2b 3 PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: HPC 2019-03 & 17 REPORT DATE: August 15, 2019 MEETING DATE: August 21, 2019 APPLICANT: N/A LANDOWNER: Reid and Julie Miller REQUEST: Consideration of the designation of 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site LOCATION: 615 Broadway Street South ZONING: RA, Single-Family Residential REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION On March 2, 2019 the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) considered a request from Reid and Julie Miller for the demolition of their residential structure located at 615 Broadway Street South. The HPC denied the demolition permit on the basis there was a feasible alternative to demolition of this historic resource. On April 16, 2019 the City Council upheld the HPC’s decision and ordered the preparation of a Designation Study (Study). Prepared by the 106 Group, the Nels Hanson home designation study is attached 615 Broadway St. South, Photo Credit: Google Images (August, 2018) HPC Case no. 2019-03 & 2019-17 Page 2 for Commission review. The attached Study notes the Nels Hanson House was constructed during the Development of Residential Neighborhoods Historic Context period but that the property is not eligible to be listed under any of the City’s applicable historic criteria identified in City Code Section 22-7, Subd. 4(2). The 106 Group’s recommendation indicates “[b]ecause the Nels Hanson House does not meet any of the local Heritage Preservation Site criteria as an individual property, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site”. As the designation study was prepared as a result of the denial of a demolition, City Code dictates the HPC must hold a public hearing for formal recommendation (to the City Council) regarding the designation of the structure as a heritage preservation site. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of the designation of 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site. ANALYSIS The adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies the goal to “safeguard the heritage of the city by preserving historic properties which reflect Stillwater’s cultural, social, economic, political, visual, aesthetic or architectural history”. Specific objectives, policies and programs include “encourage compatible remodeling, restoration, and/or reuse of historic buildings, including homes” and to “adopt housing/historic preservation regulations and performance standards to maintain the city’s existing housing stock”. Since the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City has adopted an updated demolition review ordinance (a preservation regulation tool) to help locally designate properties worthy of historic preservation. While the City has reviewed requests for demolition of structures 50 years old or greater since the mid-1990s, the existing ordinance requires the review of demolition requests for structures built prior to 1946, the ending of the era of the City’s periods of [historical] significance. This property was surveyed as part of the 1996 Stillwater South Hill Historic Preservation Planning Area survey. At that time it was determined the house was not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places though it did fit into the Development of Residential Neighborhoods in Stillwater, 1850s-1940s local historic context. This preliminary, reconnaissance-level survey was intended to cover a large neighborhood area. Though one area of the survey area contained a high concentration of homes and was identified as a potential historic district, this home was not in that area. Those findings, however, do not imply the structure was/is not locally eligible for consideration. When a Comprehensive Plan is updated and adopted, the City is required to update its Zoning Code, ordinances and other community policies to reflect the Comprehensive Plan goals. The City has adopted new preservation objectives and programs to help preserve and protect historic resources. The City has created a policy to hire an independent third party to assess the structure’s significance in relationship to the City’s adopted designation criteria. Though not required by City Code, the City’s Demolition Designation Study pre-approval process requires HPC Case no. 2019-03 & 2019-17 Page 3 consulting firms and all agencies meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983). Erin Que, 106 Group Architectural Historian, meets these qualifications. While much of the existing residence is not historic, the front 25’ of the structure remains relatively unchanged, Miss Que’s independent and impartial analysis has determined the site to not be eligible for local listing despite the known vertical plank construction type, “typical of originally company-built mining towns, lumber camps, tenant or workers cottages on farms, and summer resort communities that were popular around the turn of the last century”1. While staff and some members of the HPC and Council maintain the front portion of the home has local significance, if only as it retains similar character and that it sits in the exact location as it did when it was originally constructed, the City’s Heritage Preservation ordinance mirrors national standards. These standards require a greater level of uniqueness, character, interest, etc. As such, factors such as longevity (or other locally-determined values, priorities and goals) cannot be the sole basis for designation. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Recommend approval of the designation of the structure at 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site. B. Recommend denial of the designation of the structure at 615 Broadway Street South as a local heritage preservation site. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The process for review of the demolition and the subsequent designation proceedings is in line with the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s identified historic preservation objectives, policies, and programs. However, the demolition of the structure is in conflict with the housing policies to maintain existing housing, including the preservation of homes in good condition. As the preservation regulations pertaining to designation criteria have not been updated to reflect changing local values, designation of this structure would be in conflict with adopted City Code regulations, ordinances and community policies. Planning Commission City Code Section 21-7, Subd. 4(3) indicates the Planning Commission (PC) must make a recommendation to the Heritage Preservation Commission to approve, reject, or to modify the proposed designation. On July 24, 2019 the Planning Commission discussed the proposed designation in relationship to the comprehensive plan, the effect of the demolition on the neighborhood, and other planning considerations which may be relevant to the proposed designation. The Planning Commission is recommending denial of the designation. State Historic Preservation Office In a July 23, 2019 letter from the State Historic Preservation Office, Michael Koop supports the 106 Group’s findings by indicating “we do not find that the Hanson House exhibits the qualities 1 http://www.oldhouseweb.com/how-to-advice/boxhouse-plank-construction.shtml HPC Case no. 2019-03 & 2019-17 Page 4 necessary to quality for local designation under any of the criteria listed in Stillwater’s preservation ordinance”. Staff Staff recommends denial of the designation for the Nels Hanson House, located at 615 Broadway Street South, allowing for the demolition of the existing residence to be demolished. Attachments: Stillwater HPC Historic Site Designation Registration Form GDO Law letter (July 1, 2019) Michael Koop, MN SHPO (July, 23, 2019) Boosalis Letter (August 13, 2019) Flodin Letter (August 13, 2019) GDO Law Letter (August 13, 2019) cc: Reid and Julie Miller John Kirk, Rehkamp Larson Architects Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Historic Site Designation Registration Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name _________________________________________________________________________ Other Names __________________________________________________________________________ SHPO No. _____________________ 2. Location Street Address _________________________________________________________________________ City __________________________ State __________ County __________ Zip Code ____________ 3. Heritage Preservation Commission Certification The Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission determined that this site is eligible for designation as a Heritage Preservation Site. Chair Date 4. City Council Certification The City Council approved designation of this site as a Heritage Preservation Site. Mayor Date 5. Classification Ownership of Property: ___ Private ___Public-local ___Public-State ___ Public-Federal Number of Resources within Property ______________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions ___________________________________________ Current Functions ___________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Style __________________________________ Materials foundation _____________________________________ walls _________________________________________ roof __________________________________________ other _________________________________________ Integrity __________________________________ Narrative Description Describe the property on one or more continuation sheets. Name of Property________________________________________ 8. Statement of Significance Applicable Historic Criteria ___ 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Stillwater, State of Minnesota, or the United States.___ 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event.___ 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. ___ 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment.___ 5. Its identification as work of an architectural or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City of Stillwater.___ 6. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. ___ 7. Its unique location, scale or other physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, a district, the community, or the City of Stillwater. Applicable Historic Contexts ___ I. Precontact Period Native American Cultural Traditions___ II. Native Americams, european contact, Initial Setlement___ III. St. Croix Triangle Lumbering___ IV. Town Planning and Development___ V. St. Croix River, Railroads, and Overland Transportation___ VI. Late Nineteenth Century Agricultural Development___ VII. Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Industrial Development___ VIII. Development of Downtown Stillwater___ IX. Development of Residential Neighborhoods___ X . Development of Stillwater City, Washington County, and State Government Date of Construction ____________________________________________________________ Significant Dates ________________________________________________________________ Significant Persons _______________________________________________________________ Architect/ Builder _______________________________________________________________ Previous Documentation: Currently listed on National Register ___ Previous Surveys ___ Narrative Statement of Significance Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets. Name of Property________________________________________ Name of Property________________________________________ 9. Bibliography Use one or more continuation sheets as needed. 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property ________________ Property Identification Number _______________________ UTM References ___ ___________ _____________ ___ ___________ _____________ Form Prepared By Name ________________________________________________________________________________ Organization ___________________________________________ Date _________________________ Address _____________________________________________ Telephone _______________________ City __________________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _____________ Additional Documentation Maps A USGS or city map indicating the property’s location.A sketch map for properties having large acreage or numerous resources. PhotographsRepresentative photographs of the property. Property Owner Name ________________________________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________ Telephone _______________________ City __________________________________________ State __________ Zip Code _____________ Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 1 Narrative Description This one-and-a-half-story house with a partially exposed basement is located on the northeast side of Broadway Street South in the South Hill neighborhood of Stillwater (Map 1). The block on which this house is located is sited on top of a steep bluff that runs parallel to the St. Croix River to the northeast. A limestone retaining wall borders the front yard and features two concrete steps in the center to access the concrete sidewalk that runs to the front door (Figures 1 and 2). A concrete driveway is located along the northwest elevation of the house and slopes downward to the rear of the lot. The rear of the property was not accessible during field survey in May 2019; however, recent photos of the rear elevation were provided by the City of Stillwater (Heritage Preservation Commission [HPC] Staff Report: Case No. 2019-03, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, March 20, 2019). The house rests on a limestone foundation, is clad in vinyl siding, and has a front gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. It is oriented southwest-northeast, due to the orientation of Broadway Street South. The house was built in 1880 and originally was rectangular in plan. It exhibits characteristics of the nineteenth century vernacular architectural style found in Stillwater (Stillwater HPC 2013:12; Washington County 2019). Buildings of this era were typically clad in wood (Stillwater HPC 2013:4). On the southwest-facing façade, there is a one-story, full-width, enclosed porch that exhibits some characteristics of the Colonial Revival style (Figure 3). The porch features painted, square, wood columns; is clad in painted wood paneling beneath the windows; and has dentils beneath the eaves. The porch has a hipped roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. The primary entranceway is located at the southeast end of the porch. The windows on the second story of the house feature inoperable wood shutters. A third-story, square-shaped tower is centrally located on the northwest roof slope. Towers are not considered a character-defining feature of the nineteenth century vernacular architectural style in Stillwater. Towers were commonly built on high-style Stillwater homes (i.e. Queen Anne, Second Empire) during this time period, especially on homes with views over the St. Croix River Valley (Stillwater HPC 2013). The house has undergone several additions since it was constructed in 1880 (Washington County 2019). A one-story, full-width addition was built on the rear (northeast) elevation of the house in 1987 (City of Stillwater 1987). A one-story, bay window addition was built on the southeast elevation in 1996 (City of Stillwater 1996). A one-story, partial-width addition was built on the northeast elevation of the 1987 addition in 2010 (City of Stillwater 2010). The southeast elevation of the house has a partially exposed basement and multiple additions (Figures 4 and 5). The first story features a 1996 one-story, bay window addition in the southwest half (City of Stillwater 1996). This addition rests on a poured concrete foundation, is clad in vinyl siding, and has a hipped roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. To the northeast of the bay window addition, there is an attached pergola that is comprised of wood posts with wood latticework affixed to the top of the posts, and a gable roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. The construction date of the pergola is not known and could not be discerned from aerial photographs. A secondary entranceway beneath the pergola provides access to an above-ground hot tub. A tall, one-story, gable roof addition is located on the rear (northeast) of the house and projects beyond the original footprint of the house; it was built in 1987 (City of Stillwater 1987). This 1987 addition is clad in vinyl siding and has a front gable roof that is covered Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 2 with asphalt shingles. An exterior, concrete block chimney is located near the south corner of the original house, and is attached to the southwest wall of the rear addition; it was built between 2013-2015 (Google 2013; Microsoft 2015). A wood deck wraps around the southwest and southeast elevations of the addition and connects to a larger deck on the rear of the house. The construction date of the deck is not known, but may have been built in conjunction with the 1987 addition. Multiple additions are also located on the northeast elevation (Figure 6). The 1987 addition spans the full width of the northeast elevation. The wood deck is attached to the southeast half of the 1987 addition and is accessed by wood steps. A half-width addition was constructed in 2010 on the northwest half of the 1987 addition (City of Stillwater 2010). It is comprised of a fully exposed basement that contains a garage stall, and a tall, one-story screened porch above. The basement level is clad in vinyl siding. The screened porch has a wood frame with wood trusses that extend across the full width of the northeast elevation, creating a pergola over the wood deck. The porch walls are comprised of two-part aluminum screens. The openings in the outward-facing trusses are filled with glass. The porch has a shed roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. On the northwest elevation, the basement is partially exposed in the southwest half and fully exposed in the northeast half (Figure 7). Multiple additions are located on the northwest elevation, which is comprised of, from southwest to northeast, the two-story original house with a third-story tower projection at the northeast end, the 1987 rear addition, and the 2010 rear addition. The roofline on the original house was slightly altered in the 1990s to accommodate a second-story window, near the center (Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). The first- and second-story windows have inoperable wood shutters. The tower features a pyramid roof that is covered with asphalt shingles. According to City records, part of the siding on the tower is damaged and has been covered with plywood with decorative metal filigree and glass (HPC Staff Report: Case No. 2019-03, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, March 20, 2019). The northwest elevation of the 1987 addition consists of a fully exposed basement that contains a two-stall garage, and a first story addition to the house with a bay window and screened porch. The 2010 addition consists of a third garage stall on the basement level and an addition to the screened porch on the first story. The northwest elevation of the porch features a wood frame with two-part aluminum screens and a wood railing. Fenestration on the southwest-facing façade of the front porch, from northwest to southeast, consists of four one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over-one, screen windows; and a single-leaf metal storm door at the southeast end that is flanked by narrow, one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over-one, screen windows. Fenestration on the first story of the southwest-facing façade of the house, from northwest to southeast, consists of a six-over-six, double-hung wood window and a single-leaf wood door with four lights. Fenestration on the second story of the southwest-facing façade consists of two replacement, one-over-one, double-hung, wood windows that are slightly smaller than the original windows (Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 3 Fenestration on the southeast elevation of the front porch consists of three one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over -one, screen windows. Fenestration on the basement level of the house consists of a sliding vinyl window. Fenestration on the first story of the southeast elevation, from southwest to northeast, consists of a fixed, vinyl, octagonal window with faux wood dividers; a single- leaf door of an unknown material; and a vinyl picture window. Fenestration on the 1996 bay window addition consists of two one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers; paired wide one- over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers; and two one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers. Fenestration on the first story of the southwest elevation of the 1987 rear addition consists of a fixed, vinyl window with faux dividers. Fenestration on the first story of the southeast elevation of the rear addition consists of two vinyl picture windows. Fenestration on the second story of the southeast elevation consists of a fixed, vinyl, octagonal window; and two vinyl casement windows with faux dividers. Fenestration on the basement level of the northeast elevation consists of a vinyl window with faux dividers. The type of window operation could not be determined in the field. Fenestration on the first story of the northeast elevation, from southeast to northeast, consists of a tall, fixed, vinyl window with faux dividers; a large, sliding vinyl window; a porch access door of an unknown operation and material; and a tall, fixed, vinyl window with faux dividers. There is no visible fenestration on the second story of the northeast elevation. Fenestration on the basement level of the northwest elevation of the original house consists of three vinyl sliding windows. Fenestration on the basement level of the northwest elevation of the 1987 addition consists of two single-stall, steel, overhead garage doors. Fenestration on the basement level of the northwest elevation of the 2010 addition consists of a single-stall, steel, overhead garage door. Fenestration on the northwest elevation of the front porch consists of three one-over-one, double-hung, aluminum windows with fixed, one-over-one, screen windows. Fenestration on the first story of the original house, from southwest to northeast, consists of three one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl windows with faux dividers; and one vinyl casement window with faux dividers. Fenestration on the first story of the 1987 addition consists of three vinyl casement windows with faux dividers. There is no fenestration on the 2010 addition. Fenestration on the second story of the original house consists of a one-over-one, double-hung, vinyl window with faux dividers; and two vinyl casement windows with faux dividers. Fenestration on the third story of the tower projection consists of one vinyl casement window with faux dividers. The third story of the tower on the northwest elevation features a vinyl casement window with faux dividers on the southwest elevation; a vinyl awning window with faux dividers on the southeast elevation; two vinyl casement windows with faux dividers on the northeast elevation, and a vinyl casement window with faux dividers on the northwest elevation. Integrity The house retains excellent integrity of location as it remains in its original location in the South Hill neighborhood. The house also retains excellent integrity of setting as it remains surrounded by the Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 4 original houses that predate its construction, and is sited overlooking the St. Croix River valley (Washington County 2019). The integrity of design, materials, and workmanship have been compromised by several alterations and additions over time, including replacement siding in 1987 that is not in-kind; alterations to slightly reduce the size of the front, second-story windows in the 1990s; replacement windows throughout and new octagonal windows on the southeast elevation in the 1990s; the enclosure of the front porch in the 1990s; the bay window addition on the southeast elevation in 1996; the rear additions in 1987 and 2010; and the replacement and relocation of the original chimney in 2013-2015 (City of Stillwater 1987a; City of Stillwater 1987b; City of Stillwater 1996; City of Stillwater 1910; Google 2013; Microsoft 2015; Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). The house retains fair integrity of feeling and association as many of its nineteenth century characteristics have been obscured by alterations. Overall, the house retains poor integrity due to the significant alterations. Narrative Statement of Significance History South Hill Neighborhood This property was platted in 1848 as part of the Original Town of Stillwater, although the neighborhood was not settled immediately. The South Hill neighborhood is bounded by Myrtle Street to the north, Main Street to the east, Willard Street to the south, and Sixth Street South to the west. The oldest houses in the neighborhood are located in the north end (Roberts 1996:1, 25). Broadway Street South was not included on the 1884 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps; however, numerous houses were already built by this time in the South Hill neighborhood. In fact, 26 properties in this neighborhood were built by 1870, an additional 27 were built by 1875, and 11 were built by 1879 (Roberts 1996:23). The landscape and architectural design of the South Hill neighborhood reflects the picturesque aesthetic that became popular in the 1870s and 1880s (Roberts 1996:30). This area was generally settled by businessmen who worked at the south end of Stillwater as well as professionals, government employees, elected officials, and local tradesmen (Roberts 1996:30-33). Residences in the South Hill neighborhood exhibit a variety of popular styles from the 1880s, including Italianate, French Second Empire, and Queen Anne (Roberts 1996:40). This property is an example of the nineteenth century vernacular architecture of Stillwater. Vernacular houses built from 1845-1910 featured the following characteristics: one-and-a-half-story height; gabled roofs with wood shingles; rectangular plans with porches are later additions to increase living space; minimal ornament, two-over-two, double- hung windows, vertically proportioned; and a central chimney (Stillwater HPC 2013:7, 12). Some houses in the South Hill neighborhood also features limestone retaining walls and limestone foundations, as in this house at 615 Broadway Street South (Roberts 1996:40). After 1910, concrete block became more commonly used for foundations and retaining walls. Most of the early homes in this area were built with wood frames and siding. Wood shingles were also commonly used on roofs prior to 1900, before transitioning to asphalt or asbestos shingles (Stillwater HPC 2013:4). Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 5 Property History No original building permits for this property were on file at the City of Stillwater. Tract records on file at the Washington County Courthouse indicate that the land on which this house is sited was deeded to Nels Hanson in 1879 (Washington County Courthouse n.d.). According to Washington County records, the house was built in 1880 (Washington County 2019). The original architect or builder is not known. The property is first depicted on a Sanborn Fire Insurance Map in 1898. It included a two-story, wood frame dwelling with a shingle roof, an open one-story porch on the southwest-facing façade, and a one-story, rectangular wing at the rear that extended slightly beyond the two-story portion of the house. A one-and- a-half-story carriage house was located to the northeast of the house (Sanborn Map Company 1898). By 1910, the rear one-story wing was replaced with a square-shaped addition, slightly shorter than the width of the two-story portion, and it had an open one-story porch on the southeast elevation of the wing. Additionally, a one-story outbuilding was built to the southeast of the house (Sanborn Map Company 1910). In 1920, a building permit was issued for new shingles and general repairs (City of Stillwater 1920). The one-story outbuilding was removed by 1924 (Sanborn Map Company 1924). The carriage house was removed between 1949 and 1966 (NETR 1949; NETR 1966). The porch and part of the house were re-roofed in 1972 (City of Stillwater 1972). In 1981, a 12-foot by 21-foot deck was constructed on the rear of the house (City of Stillwater 1981). This deck is likely no longer extant due to later changes to the rear of the house. In 1987, a 24-foot by 24-foot garage and a second-story addition were constructed; this likely refers to the rear addition that is comprised of a basement-level garage and first-story addition (City of Stillwater 1987a). It may also include the construction of the tower projection, but this element is not described on available building permits. The previous square-shaped addition at the rear of the house was likely removed prior to the construction of the 1987 addition as the footprints do not match. Also in 1987, the house was re-sided with vinyl siding (City of Stillwater 1987b). According to the property owner, there were several changes to the house in the 1990s. On the southwest-facing façade, the porch was fully enclosed, the porch roof was altered, and the second-story windows were replaced and resized from the original fenestration. The roofline on the northwest elevation was altered to accommodate a second-story window in the southwest half. The octagonal windows on the southeast elevation were also installed during this period (Presentation by Reid and Julie Miller, owners, to the Stillwater City Council, April 16, 2019). The one-story, bay window addition on the southeast elevation was built in 1996, possibly in conjunction with the other changes in the 1990s (City of Stillwater 1996). In 2010, an 8-foot by 12-foot garage addition with a screened porch above was constructed on the rear of the house, as an addition to the 1987 addition. This 2010 addition included a third garage stall and extension of the existing screened porch above the second garage stall, built in 1987 (City of Stillwater 2010). As of 2013, the house’s chimney was brick and located on the ridgeline; this was likely the original chimney. It was replaced by a concrete block chimney located near the south corner of the original house between 2013-2015 (Google 2013; Microsoft 2015). In 2015, the roof shingles were replaced (City of Stillwater 2015). Due to dense tree cover, historical aerial photographs do not provide additional detail about the construction date of the tower on the northwest elevation or the pergola on the southeast elevation. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 6 Occupant History Nels Hanson lived on Broadway Street South since at least 1880 along with his wife, (Eva) Christeen, and their children, Louis (Edward), Mary, Ida, and Albert (U.S. Census Bureau 1880). Hanson was first listed at 615 Broadway Street South in the 1887 city directory (Barrett 1887:129). Hanson owned a meat market (Hanson & Co., later Hanson Meat Co.) at 234 Main Street South and later 306 Main Street South and 210 Main Street South, all of which appear to remain extant (Barrett 1887:129; Davison and Moore 1882:203; R.L. Polk & Co. 1904:124). The house was presumably built for Hanson, based on tract records at the Washington County Courthouse; however, original building permits are not on file at the City of Stillwater. Hanson moved to Stillwater in 1865 and opened his meat market in 1875. As of 1882, four individuals are listed in the city directory as employees of Hanson & Co. Hanson Meat Co. was one of five meat markets in Stillwater as of 1882, along with Kirchof & Weisel (later Fulton Meat Market), O’Neal Bros., Severance & Stone, and Isaac Staples (Davison and Moore 1882:203). Both Hanson and Staples independently owned several commercial blocks in Downtown Stillwater. Staples had arrived in the St. Croix River Valley in 1853 and organized a lumber company the following year, which became very successful. Staples’ meat market was open in Stillwater by 1871. The oldest butcher in Stillwater was John Illingworth, who began his career in 1855 (Neill 1881:579; The Saint Paul Globe, 28 June 1898:3; The Saint Paul Globe, 14 October 1898:8). By 1890, Hanson lived next door at 609 Broadway Street South. Martin M. Eldred, Benjamin S. Miller, and Elizabeth Miller (a dressmaker) were listed as residents at 615 Broadway Street South, which suggests that the property was occupied by boarders (R.L. Polk & Co. 1890:107, 131, 191). In 1892, John B. Hardy, a collector for F.J.R. Aiple resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1892:142). In 1894, Christian C. Behrens, a bookkeeper for F.J.R. Aiple resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1894:53). In 1896, Albert Bussiere, a bookkeeper for J.J. Eichten resided at this address, and Alma Ponath was a domestic servant for this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1896:69, 211). According to the 1898 and 1900 city directories, Oscar A. Darbush (or A. Oscar Garbucsh), a clerk at Stillwater Hardware Co., resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1898:97; R.L. Polk & Co. 1900:113). However, the 1900 census indicates that John Corrigan, a foreman in a shoe shop, lived at the address with his wife, Sarah, their son, Charles, and Mary Luken, a domestic servant (U.S. Census Bureau 1900). By 1902, Louis E. Hanson (son of Nels Hanson) resided at this address and was a cutter at his father’s meat market (R.L. Polk & Co. 1902:125). By 1910, Louis was associated with his parents’ house at 609 Broadway Street South and Elmer, Mary, and Dorothy Reese rented 615 Broadway Street South (R.L. Polk & Co. 1910:112; U.S. Census Bureau 1910). In 1912, Frank F. Johnson, a travel agent, resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1912:110). Johnson rented this house until at least 1920, along with his wife, Mary, and their daughters, Mary and Jeanette (U.S. Census Bureau 1920). Louis (Edward) Hanson was the owner at the time, according to a historical building permit (City of Stillwater 1920). By 1927, Louis’ son, Howard, resided at the address and worked as a bookkeeper for Hanson Meat Co. (R.L. Polk & Co. 1927:65). Howard lived there with his wife, Margaret, and their children, Howard and Mary (U.S. Census Bureau 1930). Howard remained at 615 Broadway Street South into the 1940s, but by 1945, he was associated with 609 Broadway Street South. Earl Jones, an optometrist, resided at 615 Broadway Street South with his wife, Helen (R.L. Polk & Co. 1945:52, 62, 146). In 1948, George A. Sorenson lived at this address with his wife, Clara; George was employed at Grand Café and later the state prison in Bayport (R.L. Polk & Co. 1948:110, 147; R.L. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 7 Polk & Co. 1951:112; R.L. Polk & Co. 1954:108). Sorenson remained at this address through 1977 (City of Stillwater 1972; R.L. Polk & Co. 1977:38). In 1978, Terrence (Terry) and Sally Zoller resided at this address (R.L. Polk & Co. 1978:285). Sally worked as an appraiser for the County Assessor and Terry worked for the Minnesota Department of Transportation (R.L. Polk & Co. 1980:311; R.L. Polk & Co. 1985:325). The Zollers remained the owners until December 2018 when the home was purchased by Julie and Reid Miller (Edina Realty Title Inc. 2018). A “Stillwater Historic Homes Tour” brochure suggests that this house was built in 1870 and that Bing Crosby’s mother was born here; however, a biography about Bing Crosby indicates that his mother, Catherine Harrigan, was born in a boarding room above an old creamery, and lived in a large boardinghouse on Main Street in Stillwater and a house on Second Street before leaving the area (Giddins 2001; Rivertown Restoration 1984). Therefore, it appears that any association with Catherine Harrigan is incorrect. Significance This property was previously surveyed as part of an intensive National Register survey of the South Hill Stillwater Residential Area, which recommended a potential historic district in the west side of the South Hill neighborhood. Due to this property’s location in the east side of the South Hill neighborhood, it was not identified as potentially contributing to this potential historic district (Roberts 1996). Additionally, during this intensive National Register survey, this house was recommended not preliminarily eligible for listing in the NRHP (Zahn and Roberts 1996). This property was evaluated for local significance within the following historic context: “Development of Residential Neighborhoods in Stillwater, 1850-1940; Historical Context of the South Hill, 1850s-1940s” (Roberts 1996). According to Stillwater City Code, Section 22-7, Subd. 4, this property was evaluated for local significance under the following Heritage Preservation Site criteria: 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the City of Stillwater, State of Minnesota, or the United States. This property does not stand out within the history or development of Stillwater, the South Hill neighborhood, Minnesota, or the United States. Residential development began in Stillwater in the 1850s and approximately 50 residences were built in the South Hill neighborhood prior to the construction of this property in 1880. The house directly southeast at 623 Broadway Street South was built in 1875, the house directly northwest at 609 Broadway Street South was built in 1876, a house across the street and to the southwest at 604 Broadway Street South was built in 1875, and two other properties on this block of Broadway Street South between Locust Street East and Walnut Street East were built in 1870 at 603 and 620 Broadway Street South (Washington County 2019). It is also not a distinctive example of architecture within the South Hill neighborhood, which is known to exhibit a variety of popular architectural styles from the 1880s including Italianate, French Second Empire, and Queen Anne. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #1. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 8 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event. According to local histories, this property is not known to have been the site of a significant historic event. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #2. 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City of Stillwater. The earliest known owner was Nels Hanson, a butcher and owner of Hanson Meat Co., who resided at this house in 1880 and remained for about 10 years before moving into the property next door at 609 Broadway Street South. Hanson was one of several meat market proprietors and commercial block owners in Stillwater in the 1880s and 1890s. However, his contributions within the commercial history and development of Stillwater do not appear to have gone above and beyond the contributions of other similar businessmen in Stillwater at the same time. The house was a rental property from 1890 to 1902, at which point Hanson’s son Louis resided here, who also worked at Hanson Meat Co. By 1910, Louis moved to the property next door at 609 Broadway Street South. It was again a rental property 1927 when Louis’ son Howard resided here. By 1945, Howard moved to the property next door at 609 Broadway Street South. George A. Sorenson resided here from 1948-1977, followed by Terence and Sally Zoller from 1978-2018, and Julie and Reid Miller starting in 2018. Although some of the occupants had significant tenures at this property, none of these individuals are known to be significant within the history, culture, or development of the City of Stillwater. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #3. 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment. This property retains some characteristics of the nineteenth century vernacular house style in Stillwater including its one-and-a-half-story height, gabled roof, minimal ornament, and vertically proportioned windows. However, the property has lost several characteristics of this architectural style due to later additions and alterations, including the enclosure of the porch; replacement of the original wood siding and wood shingles not-in kind; the replacement of original windows not in-kind; obstruction of the rectangular plan due to additions to the rear and southeast elevations; and removal of the central chimney. Therefore, this property does not retain sufficient distinguishing characteristics of nineteenth century vernacular houses to be exemplary of the style. Although the porch exhibits some characteristics of the Colonial Revival style, the rest of the house does not and there is no physical or historical evidence to indicate that the house was originally designed in the Colonial Revival style. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #4. 5. Its identification as work of an architectural or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the City of Stillwater. The architect and builder of this property are not known. Therefore, this property is not an example of the work of a master and accordingly, this property is not eligible under Criterion #5. 6. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represent a significant architectural innovation. This property’s vernacular form by its nature does not exhibit significant elements of architectural design or detail, and therefore, it does not represent a significant architectural innovation. In addition, most of its Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 9 exterior materials have been replaced over time. The primary original materials that remain are the limestone foundation and the wood framing of the front porch. Therefore, this property does not represent significant use of materials or craftsmanship. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #6. 7. Its unique location, scale or other physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood, a district, the community, or the City of Stillwater. The scale of this property and its general physical characteristics do not stand out within the scale and physical characteristics of the South Hill neighborhood. However, this property does retain its original limestone foundation and features a limestone retaining wall parallel to the sidewalk and the driveway. These elements are indicative of older building stock and building element found in the South Hill neighborhood. Only this property and the property to the southeast at 623 Broadway Street South feature these walls. It is not known if the walls were removed elsewhere on the block; however, the existing topography suggests that such walls were not necessary in other nearby properties. There are other examples of limestone foundations and retaining walls in the South Hill neighborhood and they are considered more prominent attributes in the North Hill neighborhood, by comparison (Roberts 1995:46); Roberts 1996:40). As such, the limestone walls and foundation of this property do not represent a distinctive visual feature among the properties in the South Hill neighborhood or the City of Stillwater. Therefore, this property is not eligible under Criterion #7. Recommendation Because the Nels Hanson House does not meet any of the local Heritage Preservation Site criteria as an individual property, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 10 Bibliography Barrett, E.F. 1887 Stillwater City Directory. E.F.Barrett, Stillwater, Minnesota. City of Stillwater 1920 Building Permit #1782. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1972 Building Permit #2452. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1981 Building Permit #5494. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1987a Building Permit #7753. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1987b Building Permit #7885. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 1996 Building Permit #12169. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2010 Building Permit #2010-00215. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. 2015 Building Permit #2015-00187. On file at Stillwater Building Inspection, Stillwater, Minnesota. Davison, C. Wright, and Anson J. Moore 1882 Stillwater City Directory for 1882-83. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, Printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Edina Realty Title Inc. 2018 Warranty Deed e-CRV No. 907968. On file at Washington County Government Center, Stillwater, Minnesota. Giddins, Gary 2001 Bing Crosby: A Pocketful of Dreams. The Early Year 1903-1940. Electronic document, https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/g/giddins-crosby.html, accessed May 14, 2019. Google 2013 Street View. Electronic document, http://maps.google.com, accessed May 14, 2019. Microsoft 2015 Streetside View. Electronic document, https://www.bing.com/maps, accessed May 14, 2019. National Environmental Title Research, LLC [NETR] Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 11 1949 Historical Aerial Photograph, Washington County, Minnesota. Electronic document, http://historicaerials.com/, accessed May 14, 2019. 1966 Historical Aerial Photograph, Washington County, Minnesota. Electronic document, http://historicaerials.com/, accessed May 14, 2019. Neill, Edward D. 1881 History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley. North Star Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota. R.L. Polk & Co. 1890 Stillwater City Directory 1890-91. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1892 Stillwater City Directory 1892-93. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1894 Stillwater City Directory 1894-95. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1896 Stillwater City Directory 1896-97. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1898 Stillwater City Directory 1898-99. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1900 Stillwater City Directory 1900-01. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1902 Stillwater City Directory 1902-03. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1904 Stillwater City Directory 1904-05. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1910 Stillwater City Directory 1910-11. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1912 Stillwater City Directory 1912-1913. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1927 Stillwater City Directory 1927-1928. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1945 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1945. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1948 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1948. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1951 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1951. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 12 1954 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory 1954. R.L. Polk & Co., St. Paul, Minnesota. 1977 1977 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. 1978 1978 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. 1980 1980 Stillwater (Washington County, Minn.) City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. 1985 1985 Stillwater Minnesota City Directory. R.L. Polk & Co., Kansas City, Missouri. Rivertown Restoration 1984 “Stillwater Historic Homes Tour” brochure. On file at the Stillwater Public Library, Stillwater, Minnesota. Roberts, Norene 1995 North Hill (Original Town) Stillwater Residential Area, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. Prepared for the City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. 1996 Final Survey Report for the South Hill Stillwater Residential Area, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. Prepared for the City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Saint Paul Globe, The [Saint Paul, Minnesota] 1898 “Isaac Staples Dead.” 28 June:3. St. Paul, Minnesota. 1903 “Stillwater.” 14 October:8. St. Paul, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company 1898 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. 1910 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. 1924 Fire Insurance Map of Stillwater, Minnesota. Sanborn Map Company, New York, New York. Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission [Stillwater HPC] 2013 Stillwater, Minnesota: Preserving Historic Neighborhoods. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 13 U.S. Census Bureau 1880 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1900 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1910 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1920 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1930 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. 1940 U.S. Federal Census. Electronic document, http://www.ancestry.com, accessed May 3, 2019. Washington County 2019 Property Viewer. Electronic document, http://maps.co.washington.mn.us/propertyviewer/, accessed May 13, 2019. Washington County Courthouse n.d. Stillwater tract book. On file at the Washington County Courthouse, Stillwater, Minnesota. Zahn, Thomas R., and Norene Roberts 1996 City of Stillwater Architectural-History Inventory Form: WA-SWC-024. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota. Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 14 Photographs Figure 1. House, Facing East-Northeast Figure 2. House, Facing East Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 15 Figure 3. House, Facing Northeast Figure 4. House, Facing Northeast Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 16 Figure 5. House, Southeast Elevation, Facing Northeast Figure 6. House, Northeast Elevation, Facing Southwest (HPC Staff Report: Case No. 2019-03, Prepared by Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner, City of Stillwater, March 20, 2019) Nels Hanson House Historic Site Designation Form Continuation Sheet 106 Group | 17 Figure 7. House, Northwest Elevation, Facing East WA-SWC-024 Map 1 Nels Hanson House 615 Broadway Street South Stillwater, Minnesota E Walnut StE Walnut St E Locust StE Locust StBroadway S t SBroadway S t S ¬«36 Map Produced by 106 Group 5/14/2019Source: 106 Group; MnDOT; Washington County 0 30 Meters 0 80 Feet [1:1,500 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia,© OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community ^_ WA-SWC-024 Inventoried Property *Property boundary based on Washington County 2018 Parcel data Abbi Wittman From: Sent: To: Subject: Abbi, Tuesday, August 13, 2019 5:14 PM Abbi Wittman Miller home on South Broadway We would like to express our support of the Miller's right to build a new home on their property at 615 Broadway St. S. We believe the new home will enhance our neighborhood and Stillwater as a whole. Peter and Susan Boosalis 515 Broadway St. S. Sent from my iPhone 1 PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-17 REPORT DATE: August 13, 2019 MEETING DATE: August 21, 2019 APPLICANT: LANDOWNER: Reid and Julie Miller REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for a new residence LOCATION: 615 Broadway Street South DESIGNATION: Pending DISTRICT: Neighborhood Conservation District Downtown Design Review District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION Reid and Julie Miller have requested Design Permit approval for the construction of a single family residence to be located at 615 Broadway Street South in the (Stillwater) Neighborhood Conservation District. The house is proposed to replace the existing residence, if that structure is not designated as a local heritage preservation site. SPECIFIC REQUEST The specific request is for the construction of an (approximately) 8,500 square-foot, four story single family residence with three-car, side loaded attached garage and street-facing, single car, drive through carport. The house is representative of Italianate design, with EPDM membrane flat/mansard and asphalt shingled hipped roof areas. The house will be constructed of full depth brick in a light sand color on a full depth, (approximately) 2,800 square foot, stone clad foundation; window sills and heads are proposed to be brick to match the exterior of the home. All Marvin Ultimate Clad (signature) windows, doors, trim, soffits, dentil blocks, brackets and mouldings, column surrounds, and open and enclosed porches will be wood or composite construction. Parapet wall caps, gutters and downspouts will be metal. ANALYSIS Case no. 2019-17 Page 2 All infill homes in the NCD, including those residences located in the Downtown Design Review District, are required to follow the NCD design guidelines. These design guidelines recommend the following: Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. Structures along South Broadway Street are predominately two and 2.5 stories tall with the exceptions being two, three story homes – four houses to the north (515 Broadway) and three houses to the south (657 Broadway). While the grades of properties on the eastern side of South Broadway often accommodate an additional story, the only other four-story home on this street is located at 515 Broadway Street South (constructed in 1989). The structure will sit taller than the adjacent structures. However, the structure conforms to the 35’ height requirement when the total height is measured from the average elevation of the front of the building. City Code requires measurement from the average elevation of the finished lot grade at the front of the home. Given an existing retaining wall in this location, the elevation in the front of the property (or even in line with the front of the home) varies. It could be argued that the front of the home includes that portion of the driveway. If this were the case, the height of the building does not conform to the maximum height requirement (of 35’) in this district. While the garage is located in the rear of the home, it is slightly oversized (1,114 square feet) for the zoning district maximum (1,000 square feet). When coupled with the square footage for the drive through carport (264 square feet), the scale of the accessory use is greater than what is customary for this district. Both the height of the structure and the total accessory (garage/carport) may require variances in order to be approved by the City. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The porch is proposed to be located 30’ from the front property line, in line with the existing porch and other homes along this street front. While a street-facing, drive-through carport is proposed, the three-car, attached garage is proposed to be side- loaded, in the rear of the home. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. Both mansard/flat and hipped roof portions are proposed. Both of these roof forms are visible in the neighborhood. Having both roof forms on a home is present on Broadway Street South. Case no. 2019-17 Page 3 Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. A 12/5 pitched roof is proposed for the upper most story. This pitch is keeping with the pitch of the hipped roof over the carport portion of the home. Mansard/flat roofs can help reduce the overall structural height. However, this was not the chosen roof form of all areas of the home, including those at the highest level. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. The property owners are proposing to concentrate improvements in already disturbed areas. Nearly all of the portions of the property proposed to be developed are already encompassed by structural components, imperious surfaces or accessory improvements. However, the site plans appear to have excess impervious surface coverage than what is permissible (25% total lot area) in this zoning district. While mature trees exist on the property, only one significant tree, located near the southerly property line in the center of the property, is proposed to be removed. Respect the site’s natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and retaining walls. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. The property and its current improvements are already heavily retained. The property owners are proposing to utilize the existing grade changes to accommodate for the new design. The ground area to the east of the existing improvements is not proposed to be changed. Building Site Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. The property owners are proposing to utilize the existing driveway to access the garage in the rear of the property. This is consistent with the existing onsite development. Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front. While the attached garage is located in the rear of the home, the attached drive-through carport does face the street. While drive-through carports are present in old Stillwater, the two- story design is not. The second story on this portion of the structure does increase the mass of this improvement though it is setback from the street. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. The property is 19,000 square feet. The footprint of the home with attached carport and garage is (approximately) 2,800 square feet. This represents less than the maximum 25% structural coverage permitted in this zoning district Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. A front porch, spanning the entire width of the front portion of the residence, is proposed. The porch is proposed to be 8’ in depth. This depth is consistent with traditional design. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. No new accessory buildings are proposed. Case no. 2019-17 Page 4 Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. The proposed design conforms to this standard. Architectural Detail The façade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. While Stillwater has residences constructed of brick, there are no brick homes along South Broadway Street. However, historic homes along this street frontage do have the same level of detail as the proposed residence. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. The elements of the building are in proportion to the residence, and are not in conflict with adjacent structures. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. The home’s materials, textures, and colors are consistent with traditional patterns found in the neighborhood and on other buildings. As noted, there are no other brick homes along South Broadway Street. The combination of the brick and the mass of the structure will have a dominating effect on this streetscape. Use masonry and stone authentically. Masonry and stone is proposed authentically. To date of the memo development, the City has received two sets of public comments. Those comments are in support of the demolition of the existing structure and the construction of a new home on this site. POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: A. Approval If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposed application meets standards set forth in the Neighborhood Conservation District, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2019-17 with or without the following conditions. 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and found on file with HPC Case No. 2019-17, except as modified by conditions herein or other City of Stillwater Planning Commission and/or City Council approval. 2. Prior to the release of a building permit, the property owner shall secure from the Planning Commission variances to the 1,000 square foot maximum accessory use (garage) requirement, the 35’ maximum height requirement, and the maximum lot coverage for impervious surfaces, if applicable. If variances Case no. 2019-17 Page 5 cannot be obtained, the applicant shall modify the design to conform to the RB – Two Family Residential zoning district standards. 3. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 4. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. All lighting shall be down-lit or shielded as to have zero lumens at the lot lines. 5. A landscaping plan, to include tree replacement for three significant trees, shall be submitted at the time of the building permit. The grading escrow shall not be returned until the landscaping and trees have been installed. 6. The driveway shall be improved with concrete or asphalt, in conformance with City Code Section 33-5. 7. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. C. Denial If the Heritage Preservation finds the proposal is not consistent with the, the Commission could deny the application. The Commission should indicate a reason for the denial and state whether or not the denial is with or without prejudice. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The purpose for the Conservation District and the review of the design of new structures is to help ensure the traditional neighborhood fabric is preserved. The review is intended to ensure new development does not contrast with the existing, historic character of the neighborhood it is proposed in. While the proposed project has been designed to fit with Stillwater’s traditional neighborhood design and serve as a standard for future new construction, several design components will make the structure stand out along South Broadway Street. First, even if the height of the structure conforms to the RB – Two Family zoning district standards, the three stories facing the front of the home presents a residence that is much taller than those around it. Massing issues at the carport are also present. While attached carports are present in Stillwater, construction of them with living space above them is not common; the design is out of character. When this is coupled with the brick façade, the structure will have a domineering effect on the traditionally lap sided homes along this street. Next, the accessory uses on the property – specifically the garage/carport space and the imperious surface areas to accommodate recreational needs do not (or appear to not) conform to the base zoning district standards. The large lot design can accommodate accessory uses and coverage, it should be in keeping with the base zoning district standards. As noted in the staff report, variances may need to be obtained if redesign cannot occur. Staff has recommended a condition of approval indicating will not be issued until such time as variances are granted. With certain modifications, the design can conform to the standards set forth by City Code and associated Stillwater Conversation District guidelines and, therefore, staff would recommend conditional approval. However, due to the State of Minnesota’s 60/120-day timeframe, the HPC does not have sufficient time to tabling consideration of the review, requesting additional Case no. 2019-17 Page 6 information. Therefore, staff recommends the Commission discuss the proposed design in relationship to the design standards set forth and determine appropriate conditions of approval. Attachments: Site Location Map NCD Application Form (two pages) Adjacent Structure Photographs Certificate of Survey Zoning Summary and Proposed Site Diagram Elevations (4 pages) House Detail Photographs (two pages) Floor Plans (4 pages) Material Schedule Public Comment (two pages) cc: Reid and Julie Miller Rehkamp Larson Architects E L O C U S T S T S O U T H MA I N S T R E E T S T A T E H I G H WA Y S 9 5 & 3 6 515 1250603 206 663 663 615 609 205 623 657 620 610 604 502 660 654 655 408 806670 522 516 300 509 651 525507 445 527 687 510 210 673 438 441 611 µ 0 170 34085Feet General Site Location Site Location 615 Broadway St S ^ Te xt 615 Broadway Street South | Neighborhood ContextHouse to Left House to Right 26' -012"3 0 '-014" 3 5'-0 " 1 0 4 '-0"REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONZONING SUMMARY ZONING DISTRICT: ·RB- TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ·NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT ·DOWNTOWN STILLWATER DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT LOT COVERAGE: MAX ALLOWABLE BUILDING COVERAGE = 25% MAX IMPERVIOUS SURFACES = 25% MAX TOTAL LOT COVERAGE = 50% TOTAL LOT AREA = 19,289 S.F. EXISTING TOTAL COVERED AREA = 7,461 S.F. EXISTING % COVERAGE = 38.7% SETBACKS: FRONT (STREET) = 20' OR ALIGNS w/ PREDOMINANT STREET SETBACK SIDE = 15' TOTAL (<5' ON EACH SIDE) REAR = 25' BLUFF = 30' HEIGHT: 35' MAX (MEASURED AT MID POINT BETWEEN EAVE AND PEAK, TAKEN FROM AVERAGE ELEVATION AT FRONT OF BUILDING) OR ALIGNS WITH WITH HEIGHT OF STREET N 1 EXISTING SITE DIAGRAM 1/8 = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/16" = 1'-0" on 11x17 A02 EXISTING SITE DIAGRAM Surveyor, RLA 26' -012"3 0 '-014" 3 5'-0 " 1 0 4 '-0"8098088075'-0"MIN SIDEYARD15' TOTALP R E D O M I N A N T S T R E E T S E T B A C K L I N E O F 3 0 ' B L U F F S E T B A C K 2 5 '-0 " R E A R Y A R D S E T B A C K 5'-0"MIN SIDEYARD15' TOTALP R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINEP O O L 8 0 8 .0 'T E R R A C E ~8 1 6 .9 ' - 8 1 6 .5 'M A I N L E V E L - 8 1 7 .0 '(L .L . 8 0 6 .5 ') P O R T E C O C H E R E 8 0 8 .9 'B L E N D G R A D E W / N E I G H B O R M A X 3 0 " D R O P D R I V E W A Y s l o p e d t o 8 0 6 .3 ' @ G a r a g e d o o r s 14'-11"10'-11"P E R I M E T E R O F E X I S T I N G H O U S E 31'-6"B O C C E 8 0 5 .0 'F O U N T .REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONZONING SUMMARY ZONING DISTRICT: ·RB- TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ·NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT ·DOWNTOWN STILLWATER DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT LOT COVERAGE: MAX ALLOWABLE BUILDING COVERAGE = 25% MAX IMPERVIOUS SURFACES = 25% MAX TOTAL LOT COVERAGE = 50% TOTAL LOT AREA = 19,289 S.F. EXISTING TOTAL COVERED AREA = 7,461 S.F. EXISTING % COVERAGE = 38.7% SETBACKS: FRONT (STREET) = 20' OR ALIGNS w/ PREDOMINANT STREET SETBACK SIDE = 15' TOTAL (NO LESS THAN 5' ON EITHER SIDE) REAR = 25' BLUFF = 30' HEIGHT: 35' MAX (MEASURED AT MID POINT BETWEEN PLATE AND PEAK, TAKEN FROM AVERAGE ELEVATION AT FRONT OF BUILDING) OR ALIGNS WITH WITH HEIGHT OF STREET A03 PROPOSED SITE DIAGRAM Surveyor, RLAN 1 PROPOSED SITE DIAGRAM 1/8 = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/16" = 1'-0" on 11x17 MAIN LEVEL SUBFL (EL. 817.0') LOWER LEVEL F.F. (EL. 806.5') SIDE ENTRY F.F. (EL. 809.0') UPPER LEVEL SUBFL ROOF TERRACE SUBFL B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS MID LEVEL SUBFL 8'-118"9'-118"8'-1114"1'-634"1'-634"8'-118"1'-634"8'-1" TO MID-LEVEL8'-0" TO MAIN LEVEL2'-6"5 12 7 12 8'-6"7 12 33'-934"TO MIDPOINT OF PLATE & RIDGE PER 31-101 HEIGHT DEFINITION 35'-0" MAX PER TABLE 31-308 (b) 7 12 5 12 UCA2036 UCA2036 UCA2656UCA2656UCA2656 UCA3272UCA3272UCA3272UCA3272UCA3272 UCA2448 UCA2448 UCA2448 UCA2448 UCA2448UCA2448 UCA2448 UCA2448 UCA2044 CUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOM 0 2 4 8 1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA20 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS JRL, JK MAIN LEVEL SUBFL (EL. 817.0') LOWER LEVEL F.F. (EL. 806.5') SIDE ENTRY F.F. (EL. 809.0') UPPER LEVEL SUBFL ROOF TERRACE SUBFL B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS MID LEVEL SUBFL 8'-118"9'-118"8'-1114"1'-634"1'-634"8'-118"1'-634"8'-1" TO MID-LEVEL8'-0" TO MAIN LEVEL2'-6"5 12 7 12 12 5 UCA2036 UCA2036 UCA3272 UCA3272 UCA3272UCA3272 UCA3272UCA3272 UCA3264UCA3264UCA3264 CUSTOMCUSTOM UCA2656 0 2 4 8 1 WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA21 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS JRL, JK MAIN LEVEL SUBFL (EL. 817.0') LOWER LEVEL F.F. (EL. 806.5') SIDE ENTRY F.F. (EL. 809.0') UPPER LEVEL SUBFL ROOF TERRACE SUBFL B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS MID LEVEL SUBFL 8'-118"9'-118"8'-1114"1'-634"1'-634"8'-118"1'-634"8'-1" TO MID-LEVEL8'-0" TO MAIN LEVEL2'-6"5 12 LANDSCAPE PATHS, STAIRS, WALLS & GRADE LINE TBD UCA2036UCA2036UCA2036UCA2036 UCA2656UCA2656 UCA3272UCA3272 UCA3272UCA3272 UCA3272 UCA3272UCA3272 CUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOM CUSTOM CUSTOMCUSTOM UCA2448UCA2448 UCA2656UCA2656UCA2656UCA2656UCA2656UCA2656 0 2 4 8 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 5 12 5 12 CUSTOMCUSTOMCUSTOM CUSTOM CUSTOMCUSTOM 0 2 4 8 1 SOUTH ELEVATION - TOWER 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 ROOF TERRACE SUBFL B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS 1'-634"8'-118"REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS JRL, JK MAIN LEVEL SUBFL (EL. 817.0') LOWER LEVEL F.F. (EL. 806.5') SIDE ENTRY F.F. (EL. 809.0') UPPER LEVEL SUBFL ROOF TERRACE SUBFL B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS MID LEVEL SUBFL 8'-118"9'-118"8'-1114"1'-634"1'-634"8'-118"1'-634"8'-1" TO MID-LEVEL8'-0" TO MAIN LEVEL2'-6"5 12 7 12 5 12 5 12 UCA2036UCA2656 UCA2036 UCA2656 UCA3272UCA3272UCA3272 UCA2648UCA2648UCA2648 CUSTOM CUSTOM CUSTOM CUSTOM CUSTOM CUSTOM UCA2656 0 2 4 8 2 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 5 12 0 2 4 8 1 EAST ELEVATION - TOWER 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 ROOF TERRACE SUBFL B.O.TRUSS B.O.TRUSS 1'-634"8'-118"REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA23 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS JRL, JK A A30 A 21 3 B 4 52.5 4.1 6 7 3.3 4 C D E TERRACE TERRACE UP 4R EXERCISE 3 CAR GARAGE BATH MUD MECH / STO LOWER MUD PORTE COCHERE UP 9+4R STORAGE (EL. 806.4) (EL. 806.5)DN 3R22'-10"ADD'L PARKING TV EXT WALL ABOVE R 2 1 '-6 " SLOPE DOWN ANY SLOPE IN THIS AREA?SLOPE DOWN LOWER LEVEL AREA CALCS FINISHED - 846 SF (INCL POOL BATH) - (746 SF previously) GARAGE - 1,318 SF (1,246 SF previously) UNFIN - 210 SF GROSS SF - 2,202 SF (EL. 809.0) (EL. 809.0) LANDSCAPE PATH / STAIR TO TERRACE LEVEL TBD 13'-0" LANDSCAPE EXT GRADE ~811.0'? 1' DEEP EGRESS WELL? 16'-0" POLISHED CONCRETE (IN-FLR ZONE 2) RESILIENT MATS OVER POL. CONCRETE (IN-FLR OK W/ MATS?)F.D.POOL PATIO SEALED CONCRETE (IN-FLR ZONE 1) STO ELECTRICAL IN FLOOR. LOCATION TBD PELOTON 809808807MECH SHAFT ABOVE TV4'-8"4'-4"4'-8"18'-0"F.D.(EL. 806.3) F.P.ABOVE ESTI ROOM TRACKED CURTAIN4' SLIDING DR POOL BATHF.D.4'-4" FD 24" U/C REF 18" D/W 24" U/C FRZ DWR OPEN SHLVS W/ TAMBOUR DOORS TO COUNTER VESTIBULE PAVERS PAVERS SEALED CONCRETE (NO IN-FLR HT?) COATS BENCH 4' SLIDING DR4' SLIDING DR 2' SHLVS12" SHLVS2'-7"STORAGESTORAGE 2' SHLVS2' SHLVS2' SHLVS18" SHLVSCOUNTER GARAGE LOUNGE11'-0"12'-0"20'-212"7'-4" COATS 12'-5"17'-2"6'-9"6'-2" 15'-2" ELEVATOR (36x60 CAB) ELEVATOR HYDRAULIC POWER UNIT & ELEC PANEL MANUF. REQ'D 36"x36" CLEAR SPACE 28"X72" BED FD BUILDER TO VERIFY EQUIP SIZE REQ'TS SEALED CONCRETE (IN-FLR ZONE 1) POLISHED CONCRETE (IN-FLR ZONE 2) WOOD (IN-FLR ZONE W/ MAIN) POLISHED CONCRETE (IN-FLR ZONE 2) RADON & SUMP PUMP 16'-0"GATEGATE2'8" 3'0"2'6"2'6"2'6"2'8"2 '6 "3'0"2'8"3'0"DN 3RREHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA10 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN JRL, JK 0 2 4 8 1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 N A A30 A 21 3 B 4 52.5 4.1 6 7 3.3 4 C D E TERRACE TERRACE UP 4+9R DN 4+9R OPEN RAIL KITCHEN ENTRY LIVING ROOM PWDR PTRY MUD BELOW SEE A10 PARLOR DINING PORTE COCHERE WOLF 486G ISLAND 11'-0'x4'-6" 4'-0" 24" SUBZ FRG D/W 5'-5" TERRACE CL. 11'-6"DN 5RBELOW SEE A10 HEARTH TV OVER F.P. MAIN LEVEL AREA CALCS FINISHED - 1,714 SF (+25) PORCH & TERRACE - 794 SF (837 SF previously) GROSS SF - 2,485 SF (2,528 SF previously) 20'-8" 10'-4"10'-4"5'-4" 15'-4" 2'-0"18'-0"2'-0" 22'-0" 12'-63 4"6'-51 4" 19'-0"8'-0" 11'-3"9'-5" 85'-0" 20'-8" 5'-0"5'-4"5'-4"33'-4"10'-0"4'-6"6'-10"17'-41 2"4'-2"3'-51 2"5'-8"8'-0"5'-8"24" SUBZ FRZ 1'-0"1'-0"12'-0"2'-0"13'-612"4'-6"HOOD ABOVE3'-7"DRAIN TO EDGE(OPT) MARVIN ULTIMATE5R 1L FOLDING DOOR24'-10"4'-6"4'-8" 3'-9"3'-6" WOOD WOOD @ ALL U.N.O. IN-FLR HEAT @ ALL3'-9"B.I. BUFFET WOLF STM OV BELOW MECH SHAFT 6'-712"WINE 8'-0"4'-6"6'-512"INSULATED W/ HUMIDITY CONTROL GRILL AREA DN 5R 5'-0" MICRO ABV C.TOP W/ UP SHVLS FRONT HALL STAIR CASUAL DINING6'-712"11'-101 2" 18'-01 2" OPEN RAIL ELEVATOR (ARROWLIFT SHOWN W/ 36x60 CAB) CASUAL DINING COFFEE U/C FRG BUTLER'S PANTRY 3 PAIR FR DRSW/ SCRNS4'-0"5"5" 1'-01 4" 2'-3" 4" 10'-4" 2'-3" 4" 2'-3" 4" 2'-3" 4" 2'-3" 4" 2'-3" 1'-01 4" 6'-51 4"5'-03 4"8" 2'6" 2'6"2'6" 36"2'6"2'8" 3'0" 3'-8"3'-8"REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA11 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN JRL, JK 0 2 4 8 1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 N A A30 A 21 3 B 4 52.5 4.1 6 7 C D TERRACE TERRACE UP 4+9R DN 4R BED B LAUND. OPEN DN 9+4R BED C BED A MASTER BEDWDW.I.C. HALL M. BATH BATH C BATH B BALCONY BATH A CL. UPPER LEVEL AREA CALCS FINISHED - 2,000 SF (1,997 SF previously) BALCONIES - 211 SF (No change) GROSS SF - 2,211 SF 12'-0"13'-8"11'-2"23'-0"14'-01 2"11'-8"4'-6"16'-13 4"13'-2"3'-6"4'-4"5'-612"5'-83 4"6'-0"5'-612"10'-6"MECH CHASELINE OF EXT WALL @ TOWER ABOVE 7'-11" TERRACE BELOW SEE A11 HOOKS +BENCHREID JULIE DRESSING BALCONY 12'-11"6'-0"5'-3"6'-0"12'-1"11'-6" 2'8" ELEVATOR (ARROWLIFT SHOWN W/ 36x60 CAB) 2'4" 2'4" 2'6"4'-9"4'-9"7'-11" 3'-9"4'-8"4'-111 2" WOOD (IN-FLOOR HEAT @ ALL, ZONED) WOOD WOOD WOOD TILE / STONE TILE / STONE TILE / STONE WOOD WOOD STONE STONE WOOD TILE / STONE MKUP CNTR 2'8" 2'8"2'8"2'4" 2'4"2'4"BENCH NO DOOR 2'4"2'6"2'6"2'8"2'6"2'4"2'8"2 '4 "REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA12 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN JRL, JK 0 2 4 8 1 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 N A A30 A 21 3 B 4 52.5 4.1 6 7 C D TERRACE TERRACE DN 3R OPEN DN 9+4R PWDR TV ROOF TERRACE42" H DESKROOF TERRACE LEVEL AREA CALCS FINISHED - 467 SF (480 SF previously) ROOF TERRACE - 566 sf (545 SF previously) GROSS SF - 1,033 SF PIZZA OVEN 24" D/W U/C FRG FLAT ROOF WORK TABLE 14'-93 4"17'-2"12'-312"16'-73 4" LOUNGE SANTA MONICA FIRE PIT TABLE 44x96x42 ELEVATOR (ARROWLIFT SHOWN W/ 36x60 CAB)2'6"3'0" WOOD IN-FLR HEAT STONE / TILE STONE PAVERS OVER PEDESTALS REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA13 ROOF & TERRACE FLOOR PLAN JRL, JK 0 2 4 8 1 PROPOSED ROOF TERRACE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" on 24x36 1/8" = 1'-0" on 11x17 N SITE UTILITIES ·GC TO ASSESS EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY ACCESS DRIVEWAY ·INCLUDE PRICE IN HOUSE POOL ·PRICE POOL RETAINING WALLS & ASSOCIATED SITE WORK & BACKFILL AS PART OF THE HOUSE ·REMINDER OF POOL & LANDSCAPE - PRICE SEPARATELY WALKS & GROUND LEVEL PATIOS ·POOL TERRACE TO BE PRICED AS PART OF THE POOL ·OTHER AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PRICED SEPARATELY AS LANDSCAPING FENCE/RAILS ·FUTURE LANDSCAPE PLAN - PRICE AS LANDSCAPING ·WALLS AT FRONT ENTRY - PRICE AS LANDSCAPING EXISTING TREES/LANDSCAPE ·FUTURE LANDSCAPE PLAN - PRICE AS LANDSCAPING ·WORK AROUND & PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES, SPECIFICALLY TWO FRONT YARD OAK TREES TO BE PRESERVED. ·VERIFY LANDSCAPE & WALLS TO REMOVE DEMOLITION ENVIRONMENTAL ·PROVIDE INFORMATION AND PRICING FOR NECESSARY ASBESTOS AND LEAD ABATEMENT AS REQUIRED O PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED BY LIFESPACE STRUCTURE (SEE “S” SERIES SHEETS FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING) FOUNDATION ·FOOTINGS & STRUCTURAL POINT LOADS PER S10 & A10. ·ELEVATOR PIT PER MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS, IF REQUIRED ·SEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PACKAGE FOR LOCATIONS & MORE INFORMATION ·DRAIN TILE @ ALL EXTERIOR & @ INTERIOR SIDE OF FOOTINGS O VERIFY ANY AREAS NOT TO BE DRAIN TILED. O IF POSSIBLE, DAYLIGHT EXTERIOR DRAIN TILE. ·IN-FLOOR HEAT AT ALL SLAB LOCATIONS, R-10 REQUIRED @ SLAB EDGES. O 3 ZONES ·POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS PER STRUCTURAL PLANS. (ADD-ALT: T-MASS WALLS) (ADD-ALT: ICF) EXTERIOR WALLS ·FULL DEPTH BRICK AND STONE OVER STANDARD 2X6 FRAMING (ABOVE FOUNDATION) ·VERIFY INSULATION METHOD(S) PER LOCATION, SEE FOLLOWING THERMAL INSULATION SECTION IN GUIDELINE (ADD-ALT: BUILDER'S PREFERRED INSULATION METHOD) ·AIR-SEAL ENVELOPE - FILL ALL ROUGH OPENING SPACES WITH LOW-EXPANSION SPRAY FOAM, SEAL ALL GAPS AND CRACKS (BETWEEN STUDS, ETC.) PRIOR TO INTERIOR FINISHES (GYPSUM BOARD, ETC.) ·SEE “S” SHEETS FOR SHEAR WALL LOCATIONS, PER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ·WHERE POSSIBLE, USE ADVANCED FRAMING TECHNIQUES AT CORNERS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INSULATION ·FINAL DETAILS TO BE ISSUED WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FLOOR STRUCTURE ● TYPICAL FLOOR - PRE-MANUFACTURED OPEN WEB TRUSSES, SEE SECTIONS & S SHEETS ● MAIN LEVEL TERRACE - PRECAST CONCRETE PLANK OVER GARAGE - WATERPROOFING ASSEMBLY TO BE DISCUSSED ● PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO ORDER. ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS REVIEW TIME. LOAD BEARING INTERIOR STRUCTURE ● PER STRUCTURAL PLANS ROOF STRUCTURE ● SLOPED ROOFS - PREMANUFACTURED ROOF TRUSSES PER PLANS ● EXTERIOR TERRACE / DECK AREAS @ UPPER & ROOF TERRACE LEVELS - PREMANUFACTURED FLOOR/ROOF TRUSSES ● PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO ORDER. ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS REVIEW TIME. EXTERIOR MATERIALS ROOFING ·ASPHALT SHINGLE? @ SLOPED ROOF AREAS ·EPDM @ FLAT ROOF AREAS (ADD-ALT: COPPER STANDING SEAM @ FRONT ENTRY ROOF, FLAT & SLOPED) ● VERIFY FLASHING MATERIAL / FINISH (ADD-ALT: COPPER PARAPET CAPS & FLASHING) ● VENTS OR GRILLS TO COVER ALL PENETRATIONS- VERIFY MATERIALS / FINISH SIDING/CLADDING (REFER TO ELEVATIONS - A20 SERIES) ● FULL DEPTH BRICK - SELECTION TBD, BUILDER TO PROVIDE $/SF ALLOWANCE ● TWIN CITY BRICK DISCUSSED AS A SUPPLIER ● FULL DEPTH STONE @ LOWER LEVEL (BASE OF HOUSE) - SELECTION TBD, BUILDER TO PROVIDE $/SF ALLOWANCE ● COMPOSITE OR WOOD PANEL FOR PAINT @ ROOF TERRACE LEVEL O ½” MDO (BUILDER SUGGESTION) ● PROVIDE EXTERIOR MOCK-UPS ● VERIFY MATERIAL & FINISH OF FLASHING & ANY EXPOSED PENETRATIONS (VENTING, ETC) TRIM ● WINDOWS AND DOORS @ PUNCHED OPENINGS (SINGLE UNITS)- 2” FACTORY APPLIED CLAD BRICK MOULD ● WINDOWS AND DOORS @ GANGED OPENINGS (MULTIPLE UNITS)- WOOD OR COMPOSITE TRIM FOR PAINT, PER ELEVATIONS ● TRIM BANDING UNDER SOFFIT, ASSUME SOME DETAIL, SUCH AS DENTIL MOULDING & WOOD/COMPOSITE TRIM PER ELEVATIONS ● SILLS / HEADS - BRICK, TO MATCH SELECTION OF HOUSE FIELD BRICK (ADD-ALT: STONE - PREFERRED BY CLIENT, AS SHOWN IN ELEVATIONS) ● COLUMN SURROUNDS TO BE WOOD/COMPOSITE, LOCATION/NUMBER PER ELEVATIONS ● WOOD OR COMPOSITE TRIM FOR PAINT @ ROOF TERRACE LEVEL SOFFIT/FASCIA/GUTTERS ● FASCIA - FOR PAINT ● SOFFITS AND OVERHANGS - BEAD BOARD FOR PAINT OR STAIN ● BRACKETS & MOULDINGS - WOOD/COMPOSITE, LOCATION/NUMBER PER ELEVATIONS ● GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS - HALF ROUND GUTTERS, ROUND DOWNSPOUTS, METAL (ADD-ALT: COPPER) ● PARAPET WALL CAPS - FACTORY FINISHED METAL OR STONE. VERIFY. WINDOWS (REFER TO SCHEDULE AND ELEVATIONS FOR WINDOW SIZES, OPERATION, AND MUNTIN PATTERNS) ● ASSUME ALL WINDOWS ARE OPERABLE CASEMENT STYLE ● EXTERIOR FINISH - CLAD W/ FACTORY FINISH ● INTERIOR FINISH - WOOD FOR STAIN OR PAINT ● ASSUME WOOD SCREENS TO BE PAINTED ON SITE ● MANUFACTURER - MARVIN ULTIMATE CLAD (SIGNATURE) ● WINDOW SIZES - SEE ELEVATIONS FOR MARVIN MANUFACTURER ID #'S, MOST WINDOWS STANDARD SIZES ● 5/8” MUNTINS, PATTERN PER ELEVATIONS ● HISTORIC SILL ● WINDOW SCHEDULE & DETAILS TO FOLLOW GARAGE DOOR (REFER TO ELEVATIONS) ·CUSTOM WOOD GARAGE DOOR - WOOD FOR STAIN W/ LAYOUT SIMILAR TO ELEVATIONS (IDC, DESIGNER DOORS OR EQUIV.) NOTE: PRIOR TO ORDERING, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT & OWNER FOR REVIEW. ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR COORDINATION AND REVIEW PERIOD. EXTERIOR DOORS (REFER TO SCHEDULE, ELEVATIONS AND PLANS FOR SIZES, OPERATION, AND MUNTIN PATTERNS) ● MANUFACTURER - MARVIN ULTIMATE CLAD (SIGNATURE) ● EXTERIOR FINISH - CLAD OR WOOD FOR STAIN, BASED UPON LOCATION, BELOW. COLOR TBD. ● INTERIOR FINISH - TO BE WOOD FOR STAIN OR PAINT ● LOCATIONS: ○ FRONT ENTRY DOOR: WOOD, CUSTOM ○ PORTE COCHERE DOORS: WOOD, CUSTOM ■ (ADD-ALT: CUSTOM WOOD DOOR (I.E. GREAT NORTHERN DOOR CO.): (VERIFY SIZE) WITH STILE & RAIL CONSTRUCTION, ARCHED/CURVED TOP.) ○ GARAGE TO MUDROOM DOOR: TO MATCH INTERIOR DOOR STYLE, MATERIAL, FINISH ○ CASUAL DINING DOOR: WOOD, CUSTOM ○ GARAGE TO POOL AREA DOOR: STEEL W/ WOOD FACING ○ GARAGE BATH DOOR: CUSTOM, LOUVERED ○ OTHER EXTERIOR DOORS: SAME MANUFACTURER AS WINDOWS OR PER GC RECOMMENDATION ● HARDWARE FOR EXTERIOR ENTRY DOORS TO BE INCLUDED IN HARDWARE ALLOWANCE ● PROVIDE ALLOWANCE FOR CUSTOM SCREEN DOORS TO MATCH DETAILS OF FRONT DOOR ● GREAT NORTHERN DOOR COMPANY, CDC OR SIMILAR NOTE: PRIOR TO ORDERING, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT & OWNER FOR REVIEW. ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR COORDINATION AND REVIEW PERIOD. MAIN LEVEL TERRACE (REFER TO ELEVATIONS AND PLANS) ● STONE WALLS & STEPS - TO MATCH HOUSE SELECTION STONE PAVERS: SELECTION TBD, ON PEDESTALS W/ DRAINAGE PLANE BELOW TO INTERNAL DRAINS (ADD-ALT: WET SET STONE OVER TWO STAGE DRAINAGE SYSTEM & LIQUID APPLIED WATERPROOF MEMBRANE) ● COLUMNS - CLAD, LOW MAINTENANCE. TBD DESIGN. FRONT PORCH / STOOP ● STONE WALLS & STEPS - TO MATCH HOUSE SELECTION ● COLUMNS - CLAD, LOW MAINTENANCE. TBD DESIGN. INTERIOR MATERIALS INTERIOR WALL FINISHES (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS) ● STANDARD FINISH - SHEETROCK & PAINT. LEVEL 5. ● WOOD WAINSCOT @ DINING ROOM FOR PAINT ● PAINT/COLOR TO BE DETERMINED ● MOCKUPS TO BE PROVIDED FLOORING (REFER TO FLOOR PLANS FOR MATERIAL LOCATIONS) ● WOOD: ENGINEERED OVER IN-FLOOR HEAT - MAIN, UPPER & ROOF TERRACE LEVELS ● TILE/STONE: SEE TILE/STONE SECTION FOR PRICING/ALLOWANCE INFORMATION ● CONCRETE: VERIFY FINISH PER AREA @ LOWER LEVEL & GARAGE CEILING (REFER TO 'E' SERIES SHEETS) ● MOST CEILINGS TO BE SHEETROCK & PAINT. LEVEL 5. ● VERIFY OTHER AREAS THAT ARE UNIQUE THERMAL INSULATION ·EXTERIOR WALLS. R-20 MINIMUM (ABOVE GRADE) ·FOUNDATION WALLS: R-15 MINIMUM W/ R-10 OUTBOARD (BELOW GRADE) (ADD-ALT: T-MASS WALLS) (ADD-ALT: ICF) ·OVERHANGING FLOORS: R-30 MINIMUM. BUILDER TO VERIFY TYPE. ·ROOF: R-49 MINIMUM ·BUILDER TO VERIFY TYPE @ ALL LOCATIONS & ENSURE CODE MINIMUMS ARE MET OR EXCEEDED. ACOUSTIC INSULATION ● ASSUME ACOUSTIC INSULATION WHERE POSSIBLE IN WALLS AND FLOORS/CEILINGS AROUND MASTER SUITE, BATHROOMS, POWDER ROOMS, UPPER LAUNDRY AND NEW MASTER CLOSET. ● RC CHANNEL @ MAIN LEVEL CEILING STAIRS (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS) ● SOLID WOOD TREADS & RISERS TO MATCH WOOD FLOOR SELECTION ● WOOD NEWEL POSTS FOR PAINT OR STAIN ● METAL BALUSTER INFILL @ GUARD RAILS ● WOOD HAND RAILS FOR STAIN, ASSUME SOME DETAIL CABINETRY (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS) ● CABINETRY STYLE: INSET W/ EXPOSED HINGES ● ASSUME THAT ALL CABINETRY IS SITE FINISHED (PAINT/STAIN) ● ASSUME THAT ALL PAINTED WOODWORK HAS A HAND-BRUSHED FINISH ● ASSUME ADJUSTABLE SHELVES IN ALL CABINETRY ● ASSUME ROOM IN BUDGET FOR SOME DRAWER ORGANIZERS (SILVERWARE DIVIDERS, ETC.), FINAL LOCATIONS TBD. ● UNDERMOUNT SOFT-CLOSE HARDWARE FOR DRAWERS ● ASSUME PANELED FRONTS ON ALL POSSIBLE APPLIANCES (REFRIGERATORS, DISHWASHERS, ETC.) ● SOLID WOOD COUNTERTOPS TO BE STAINED IN MOST LOCATIONS ● CLOSERS ON CABINET DOORS SHOULD BE ROLLER-TYPE CLASPS ● CABINET MAKER TO INCLUDE ALL BUILT-IN CABINETS IN PRICING NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS & CABINET DOOR MOCK-UP FOR ARCHITECT & OWNER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO ORDERING. ALLOW UP TO 4 WEEKS FOR REVIEW/REVISION PERIOD. COUNTERTOPS (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS) ● STONE: PROVIDE ALLOWANCE OF $120/ S.F. MATERIAL COST & INSTALLATION AT ALL COUNTERTOP AND BACKSPLASH AREAS. VERIFY EDGE & CORNERS; VERIFY SLAB THICKNESS AT BACKSPLASH AREAS NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT & OWNER REVIEW OF SLAB DETAILS & PLUMBING PLACEMENT. INTERIOR DOORS (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS) ● SOLID WOOD FOR STAIN OR PAINT ● SINGLE PANEL W/ STICKING ● 1 3/4” THICK @ MAIN LEVEL ● HEIGHTS: O MAIN LEVEL DOORS - 8'-0” O LOWER LEVEL DOORS - 7'-0” O UPPER LEVEL(S) DOORS - 7'-0” NOTE: PRIOR TO ORDERING, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT & OWNER FOR REVIEW. ALLOW UP TO 2 WEEKS FOR COORDINATION AND REVIEW PERIOD. TRIM (CROWN, FENESTRATIONS, BASE) (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS) - ALL FOR PAINT ● LOWER LEVEL ● BASE - SEE MAIN LEVEL FOR MUD ROOM(S), ESTI ROOM. RESILIENT BASE @ EXERCISE & GARAGE SPACES ● DOOR & WINDOW CASING - SEE MAIN LEVEL. ● CROWN - APPROX. 4” TALL. STANDARD PROFILE. METAL OR MINIMAL TRIM DETAIL @ GARAGE SPACES. ● POSTS - SEE MAIN LEVEL. ● NO TRIM IN GARAGE STORAGE & MECHANICAL SPACES ● STONE OR METAL TRIM @ POOL BATH ● MAIN LEVEL ● BASE - APPROX. 7” TALL. STANDARD PROFILE. ● DOOR & WINDOW CASING ~ 4” WIDE INCLUDING 1” BACK BAND. STANDARD PROFILE. ● CROWN - APPROX. 9” TALL. STANDARD PROFILE. ● BEAMS - 8” WIDE. SEE CROWN PROFILE ABOVE ● POSTS - APPROX. 8X8. ASSUME SOME DETAIL. ● UPPER LEVELS ● BASE - SEE MAIN LEVEL ● DOOR & WINDOW CASING - SEE MAIN LEVEL. ● CROWN - APPROX. 6” TALL. STANDARD PROFILE. TILE / STONE (REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS FOR PRELIMINARY INFORMATION AND LAYOUT) ·ASSUME $70/FT @ MASTER BATH FLOOR ·ASSUME $30/FT @ ALL OTHER INTERIOR FLOOR & WALL CONDITIONS INTERIOR FIXTURES APPLIANCES: ● PROVIDE ALLOWANCE OF $___________ FOR APPLIANCES - SEE WARNER STELLIAN SELECTIONS FIREPLACES: ● FAMILY ROOM ● MASTER BEDROOM ● ROOF TERRACE - PIZZA OVEN HARDWARE ● BUILDER TO PROVIDE PRELIMINARY ALLOWANCES FOR ENTIRE PROJECT. ● ALLOWANCES TO INCLUDE: CABINET HARDWARE, INTERIOR & EXTERIOR DOOR HARDWARE, BATHROOM ACCESSORIES ● SELECTIONS TBD CLOSETS ● SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS WINDOW COVERINGS ● BLINDS, DRAPERIES TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. ELEVATOR ·MANUFACTURER: ARROWLIFT, OR BUILDER PREFERRED? ·SIZE - APPROX. 3'X5' SHOWN IN PLANS ·5 STOPS, SEE PLANS FOR OPENING ORIENTATION & HEIGHT ABOVE FLOOR ·BUILDER TO VERIFY DETAILS REGARDING INSTALLATION MECHANICAL ● CONTRACTOR AND HVAC SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PROPOSED HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE HOUSE. SYSTEMS SHOWN ON PLANS INCLUDE HYDRONIC IN-FLOOR HEAT, WARMBOARD UNDERLAYMENT, FORCED AIR HEAT, COOLING & VENTILATION - SEE A PLANS FOR LOCATIONS. ● VERIFY VENTING FOR ALL BATH FANS, RANGE HOOD, DRYER, ETC. ● VERIFY LOCATION AND APPEARANCE OF ALL PENETRATIONS ● REVIEW GRILL REGISTERS FOR COLD AIR RETURNS & HOT/ COLD AIR SUPPLIES. IE. STEELCREST, REGGIO REGISTERS, ETC. PLUMBING WATER SUPPLY ● CONFIRM WATER QUALITY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREATMENT / FILTRATION IF NEEDED ● ALL HOT-WATER PIPES TO BE INSULATED PER CODE ● HYDRONIC IN-FLOOR HEAT AT SOME LOCATIONS - SEE MECHANICAL SECTION ABOVE ● CONFIRM FILTERED WATER LOCATIONS PER CLIENT ● CONFIRM HOSE BIB LOCATIONS @ EXTERIOR OF HOUSE ● CONFIRM POOL REQUIREMENTS FIXTURES ● PROVIDE ALLOWANCE OF $____________ FOR PLUMBING FIXTURES. (REFER TO ATTACHED 'ALLOWANCE WORKSHEET' FOR DETAILS) RADON ● PROVIDE RADON MITIGATION SYSTEM IF NEEDED ELECTRICAL (REFER TO 'E' SERIES SHEETS) NOTE: PRIOR TO WIRING, CONTRACTOR, ELECTRICIAN, ARCHITECT & OWNER TO DO WALK-THROUGH TO VERIFY LOCATION OF LIGHTS AND SWITCHES; PROVIDE ROUGH-IN BOXES ON WALLS & CEILINGS FOR WALK-THROUGH. ● CONTRACTOR AND ELECTRICIAN TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE HOUSE ● PROVIDE ALLOWANCE OF $____________ FOR DECORATIVE FIXTURES (REFER TO ATTACHED 'ALLOWANCE WORKSHEET' FOR DETAILS) ● ALL LED UNDER CABINET LIGHTING, RECESSED CANS AND CLOSET FIXTURES TO BE PROVIDED BY ELECTRICIAN. O ELECTRICIAN TO RECOMMEND PREFERRED UNDER CABINET LIGHTING TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT & OWNER. ● ASSUME STANDARD 4” RECESSED CANS AT MOST LOCATIONS O VERIFY LAMP TYPE FOR TYPICAL RECESSED LIGHTS (MR-16, INCANDESCENT, LED) ● PROVIDE LINE ITEM FOR LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM (LUTRON, ETC.) ● COLOR & MATERIAL OF SWITCHES, OUTLETS, THERMOSTATS, AND COVER PLATES TO BE DETERMINED O ASSUME SCREWLESS TYPE COVER PLATES?? ● ALL FLOOR OUTLETS AND JACKS SHOULD BE RECESSED WITH A FLUSH PLATE- VERIFY FINISH AND MANUFACTURE ● ELECTRICIAN TO PROVIDE UTILITY LIGHTING @ UNFINISHED SPACES A/V ● BUILDER TO PROVIDE ALLOWANCE FOR A/V ● HARD WIRED NETWORK JACKS ● PROVIDE WIRELESS COVERAGE THROUGHOUT HOME ● CABLE / NETWORK / TELEPHONE SECURITY ● VERIFY SECURITY NEEDS WITH OWNER ADDITIONAL TESTING ·COMMISSIONING: (VERIFY W/ CLIENT) -PROVIDE BLOWER DOOR TEST AT AN APPROPRIATE TIME IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS VERIFY PROPER SEAL IN THE HOUSE -PROVIDE THERMAL IMAGING TEST AT AN APPROPRIATE TIME IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS TO VERIFY ADEQUATE INSULATION ADDITIONAL ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN PRICING ·LANDSCAPING (SEEDING, SOD, PLANTINGS) ·ALL INTERIOR FURNISHES (FURNITURE, LAMPS, RUGS, WINDOW TREATMENTS) ·PROVIDE SEPARATE PRICING NUMBERS FOR POOL AREA & ASSOCIATED SCOPE OF WORK MATERIALS GUIDELINE REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC.2732 West 43rd Street, Mpls, MN 55410Tel. 612-285-7275 Fax. 612-285-7274DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PROJECT NUMBER:Julie & Reid Miller Residence 615 Broadway Street SouthStillwater, MN 55082PRELIMINARY PRICING 18-071 08/02/2019 - PRELIMINARY PRICING SET - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA04 MATERIALS GUIDELINE JRL, JK Abbi Wittman From: Sent: To: Subject: Abbi, Tuesday, August 13, 2019 5:14 PM Abbi Wittman Miller home on South Broadway We would like to express our support of the Miller's right to build a new home on their property at 615 Broadway St. S. We believe the new home will enhance our neighborhood and Stillwater as a whole. Peter and Susan Boosalis 515 Broadway St. S. Sent from my iPhone 1 PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-18 REPORT DATE: August 14, 2019 MEETING DATE: August 21, 2019 APPLICANT: City of Stillwater LANDOWNER: City of Stillwater REQUEST: Design Permit approval for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project LOCATION: East Nelson Street to a point near the southern city limit in Bridgeview Park DESIGNATION: NA DISTRICT: Downtown Design Review District Stillwater Cultural Landscape District South Main Archaeological District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Shawn Sanders, City Engineer INTRODUCTION The City of Stillwater will be conducting a riverbank restoration project between Nelson Street East and the southern city limit; the project boundaries extend along the St. Croix River shoreline for nearly three-quarters of a mile. The purpose of the project is to stabilize the shoreline while separating users to provide pedestrian safety in an area where there is significant pedestrian, cyclist, and vehicular congestion. The most significant work of the project will be the installation of rip rap and vegetation along the shoreline. Additional work includes the installation of a quarter-mile 10’ wide concrete Riverwalk to help improve pedestrian connectivity in this location. Overlook platforms will be constructed adjacent to the river, accessed from the existing Lower Loop Trail. Approximately one-third of the project, the Riverwalk as well as one overlook that will attach to the St. Croix Boat and Packet gangways, is located in the Downtown Design Review District. As per City Code, this is the cause for Heritage Preservation Commission review. Shoreline restoration work and the installation of two overlooks will occur on the eastern boundary of the HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 2 eligible South Main Archaeological District and the Stillwater Cultural Landscape District. These eligible districts are not designated as local heritage preservation sites; the City Code is silent on the HPC’s review of the work in this area. However, the State Historic Preservation Office has indicated they would like to have the local HPC review the project. At the Heritage Preservation Commissions regularly scheduled meeting in July, the Commission requested additional information from the City and its representatives. Specifically, the HPC requested: landscape plans, details of the proposed retaining wall, detailed grades on high and low elevations in the wall areas, and an accurate representation of platform sizes. Since the HPC’s last meeting, City staff has met with representatives from the MN Department of Natural Resources and the National Park Service’s St. Croix National Scenic Riverway to determine platform designs that will not only conform to City, State and Federal standards and guidelines but also provide for minimal long-term maintenance while not becoming a public nuisance. The plans have been additionally updated to reflect changes desired by the Commission. SPECIFIC REQUEST A Design Permit for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk project. ANALYSIS Proposed Improvements Constructed near the Army Corps of Engineers levee wall at Nelson Street East, a 10’ walkway will be constructed in one of two ways: 1. Remove existing trees in the City’s easement area and install a steel I-beam and precast concrete panel wall, painted to match the existing levee wall, with a black, pipe rail fence to match the existing MNDOT previously installed railing along the riverfront. 2. Remove existing trees in the City’s easement areas and install a steel I-beam and precast concrete panel wall, painted to match the existing wall, and riprap to the existing shoreline. Under this scenario, no pipe rail fence will be installed; the walkway foundation will be at the water level. Under both of these scenarios, a small portion of the existing levee wall and railing is proposed to be removed. However, the City is exploring an alternative design that utilizes the Sam Bloomer/Nelson Street right-of-way intersection to connect an existing ADA ramp to the HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 3 trail without existing level wall or railing removal. The wall will follow the river, around the Dock Café. From this point to the Shoddy Mill and Warehouse site, the 10’ pedestrian at-grade walkway will continue alongside the Loop Trail with riprap on the riverside. Vegetation tolerant of intermittent flooding will include native grass (at and below elevation of 686’) & wet seed mix (at and above an elevation of 686’) will be installed. Where the shoreline straightens out, to the south of the Dock Café, tree removal will occur but riparian and prairie seed mix will serve as a groundcover for ferns, chokecherry, false indigo, dogwood, and willow spaced 4-6’ apart in rip rap fill. Where the land area narrows, to the south of St. Croix Boat and packet, a total of 36 Black spruce and mountain maple will be spaced a minimum of 10’ apart to replace existing trees that need to be removed to stabilize the shoreline. HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 4 Three 20’ square, 400 square-foot, steel H-pile and concrete overlooks will be installed. All three will be painted brown to blend with the natural environment. The City’s black, pipe-rail fencing will be installed on all three overlooks. This overlook design conforms to the riverway design principles and is supported by Department of Natural Resources and National Park Service’s St. Croix Riverway representatives. While a cantilevered design was considered, the three agencies determined that design could become a public nuisance with vegetation growth occurring under the platform. There is additional concern for vandalism underneath the structure. The first of the overlooks will be located at St. Croix Boat and Packet loading dock. The landing will rise approximately 11’ above the ordinary high water but be visibly blocked, from the river, by St. Croix Boat and Packet’s commercial tour boats. The primary purpose of this overlook is to provide for pedestrian loading and unloading in an area that is both off the street and the Riverwalk. A secondary function of the overlook is to connect existing and future gangways. The other two overlooks will be over existing stormwater outlets in Bridgeview Park. The middle overlook will be situated (approximately) 6’ and the southerly overlook will be situated (approximately) 3.25’ above the ordinary high water line of 679.6’. The Commission has expressed concern for the size of the improvements at low water level. The average flood elevation low is 676.5’. This means the middle overlook will be situated (approximately) 9’ and the southerly overlook will be situated (approximately) 6’ above the low water elevation. Area Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Resources A portion of the Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk project extends from the easterly edge of the Stillwater Commercial Historic District to the northerly boundary of the HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 5 Mortiz Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse site (Bergstein site), adjacent of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible South Main Archaeological District. The attached Map 1, Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project Boundary, Proposed Fill and Haul Road, and National Register of Historic Places, shows the designated and eligible historical, cultural, and archaeological resources in the vicinity of proposed fill and the haul road (which is the established Lower Loop Trail and an existing dirt access road located on top of the a sanitary sewer main). As indicated, the project work will occur within the NRHP-eligible South Main Archaeological District as well as within the NRHP-eligible Stillwater Cultural Landscape District. No work will be conducted in the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. City Code Regulations (Standards) and Guidelines As the Commission is aware, there are several sections of City Code that govern the HPC’s activities. Many of these code sections conflict with one another. One of the challenges for HPC review is the overlapping districts and the lack of review standards and guidelines in certain portions of the project’s boundary. For simplicity’s sake, City Code Section 22-7, Subd. 6 indicates the commission shall review and make recommendations to the city council concerning city activity that could change the nature or appearance of a heritage preservation site (any area, place, building, structure, lands, districts or other objects that have been duly designated heritage preservation sites by the City of Stillwater). The only heritage preservation site is the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. The City Code states the HPC shall take the following applicable standards into consideration of alterations to heritage preservation sites and those areas in the Downtown Design Review District:  Site layout: The orientation and location of … open spaces in relation to the physical characteristics of the site, the character of the neighborhood and the appearance and harmony…with adjacent development.  Landscaping: o The location, height and material of walls, fences, hedges, trees and screen plantings to ensure harmony with adjacent development or to conceal areas, utility installations or other unsightly development. o The planting of ground cover or other landscape surfacing to prevent dust and erosion. o The preservation of healthy mature trees. o Usable open space in terms of quantity and quality of landscaping.  Traffic circulation, safety and congestion.  Drainage: o The effect of the site development plans on the adequacy of the storm and surface water drainage to both the site and adjacent property. o Connection with existing drainage system.  Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources.  Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 6 Relevant Downtown Design Review District guidelines indicate projects should:  Highlight important architectural features and structures by use of distinctive landscaping.  Visually and physically buffer parking lots from adjacent buildings and pedestrian walkways with groupings of plant materials.  Frame and edge existing and proposed building where feasible with appropriate types of plant material to achieve human scale. Regarding the portions of the project located in the eligible districts, the City does not have guidelines or standards for review. However, if these were locally-listed resources, the following applicable guidelines would be used to evaluate applications:  Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure or site and its environment or to use a property for its originally intended purposes.  The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features must be avoided when possible.  All buildings, structures and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.  Changes, which may have taken place in the course of time, are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right and this significance shall be recognized and respected.  Contemporary design for alterations and additions shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment.  Whenever possible new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in a manner that if the additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Resource Impact The purpose for review is to two-fold:  to preserve, protect and perpetuate places, buildings, structures and other objects having locally recognized special historic significance, community or aesthetic interest; and to  secure the general purposes of the comprehensive plan, West Stillwater Business Park Plan and downtown plan, to maintain the character and integrity of neighborhoods and commercial districts by promoting excellence of design and development, preventing traffic hazards, providing adequate services and encouraging development in harmony with its neighborhood or planning area. Stillwater Commercial Historic District: Work proposed begin at the Army Corps of Engineers floodwall near the site of the former Bonson & Cover Warehouse. This is an area that, since HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 7 1924, has been filled. This can be seen on the attached Mapset 1, 1898-1924, 1924-1946, and 1946-1984 Shoreline Maps, produced by the Army Corps of Engineers as part of the Historical Reconstruction of the Riverfront: Stillwater, Minnesota. The area impacted in this located was historically under water. The new Riverwalk support is proposed to start at the levee wall, a contributing structure in the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. It is proposed to have similar materials and colors as the existing wall but will not be an identical match to the existing wall. The HPC has expressed a desire for the new wall to match the existing wall. However, the existing wall’s design is made entirely of concrete, where the proposed wall is both concrete and metal, painted to match the existing. The reason for this change in materials is the new wall is designed to better withstand water and ice pressure that this area is subject to over its lifespan. The existing Army Corps levee wall was replaced in 1996, approximately 60 years after original construction. The new wall is estimated to have a 100-year lifespan. The only historic structure potentially affected is the existing levee wall and railing. If no portion of the wall is removed, then the impact will be the continuation of a wall from the Nelson Street right-of-way and the wall’s visibility from the river. If the new wall is designed to sit at/near the water level, the relationship to the physical characteristics of the site will be in harmony with the existing wall. If the wall is constructed to have a railing, the painted metal and concrete materials will have a similar appearance to the existing wall as the materials, color and texture have been chosen to reduce the differences between the old and new walls. Moritz Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse: As noted, these structures were relocated to this site as part of the St. Croix Riverway project. The riverbank in this area was built up and filled prior to 1946; the shoreline was stabilized prior to the building’s relocation. No improvements proposed will affect these structures. South Main Archaeological District: This post-contact site once encompassed the Hersey & Bean Lumber Company complex constructed around 1853. Mill ruins mark the foundations of an office, sawmills and a planing mill. The complex was sold for salvage in 1906. Numerous wooden structure and wood decks and platforms, sometimes constructed on piers over the river, were all located within the proposed project’s boundary. An image of the site is shown on the attached Image 1, Hersey, Bean & Brown. As noted by Two Pines Resource Group, LLC, (TPRG) the Phase I/II archaeological investigations of the Hersey & Bean Sawmill and Planing site consisted of the excavation and clearing of foundations, and mapping of all the excavated features. As much of the main sawmill complex was a wood-framed structure constructed on piers, the excavation focused on features that were likely to have archaeological signatures, such as those structure’s identified on the Sanborn maps as having stone foundations. Mapset 2 identifies the NRHP-eligible South Main Archaeological District boundaries. TPRG’s found “the ruins of the mill exhibit excellent integrity of location, materials, and association” and further recommend “appropriate level of treatment of theses cultural resources be determined”. However, TPRG’s study defined the horizontal and vertical boundaries of each site, noting the mill structures were documented in photographs and on historical maps. As shown on the attached Mapset 3, 1884 and 1888 Sanborn maps, and supported by Two Pines’ HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 8 research, these foundations were located greater than 50’ from the river shoreline, west of the existing dirt access road proposed to be used as the haul road and City of Stillwater sanitary sewer main. This can also be seen on Map 2 of TPRG’s Trench #10. Given this, the project will not impact the South Main Archaeological District. Stillwater Cultural Landscape District: The NRHP-eligible Stillwater Cultural Landscape District (SCLD) addresses the relationship between the natural and built environments. According to the National Parks Service, “in the broadest sense, a cultural landscape district is an expression of human adaptation to and use of the natural resources in the area”. Barbara J. Henning’s Cultural Resource Investigation of the St. Croix River Bridge indicates there are three scales that define the boundary: the overall distinguishable landscape (i.e. the river valley, itself) and its clustered areas (i.e. Boomsite, sawmill areas, and the Stillwater community), prominent objects and structures that have been historically important (i.e. Stillwater’s stairs), and small scale elements (building texture, fencing, etc.). With regard to Stillwater’s development the “relationship among these resources [over time] that most often describes the ‘character’ of a landscape”. The report notes “the boundaries of the Stillwater Cultural Landscape District are the Original Town Plat [O.T.P.] for Stillwater. The O.T.P. …as a strong visual association with Lake St. Croix”. The report notes the historical development of industrial and commercial waterfront uses with residential uses climbing and topping the hillside. Henning’s nomination asserts three periods of significance: Industry (Lumber), 1860s-194, Social History, 1839-1940, and Architecture, 1848-1927), outlining contributing and noncontributing resources within the district. Vividly linked with the Lift Bridge, the [Lowell] park and bridge represent the shift from lumber town to the self-described “City of Stillwater on the Picturesque St. Croix”. HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 9 Aside from the South Main Archaeological District, there are no contributing resources within the project boundary. This is largely due to the fact that the area south of Lowell Park was industrial lands until the City officially designated the land a park in the mid-1990s. The impact analysis is weighted on whether or not the installation of rip rap, vegetation, the concrete walkway and railing, and the three overlooks as well as the tree removal and replacement will jeopardize the impact to the eligible district. The material installations (rip rap and plantings) along shoreline will keep the shoreline looking natural; this is consistent with other fill material placed along the shoreline in this area by both the City and other agencies. While the concrete walkway will be visible from the river, the improvement will help visually frame the separation between the water and land. This will help create a separate and distinct boundary in this area. The concrete walkway will be slightly above ground grade in this location. However, from the edge of the walkway to the shoreline, natural vegetation and riprap will be in place. Therefore, the Riverwalk will not have an impact on the SCLD. Additionally, railing (previously installed by MNDOT as part of the St. Croix River Crossing project) exists within the project boundary and is visible from the riverway; an extension would help create a more uniform appearance along the shoreline. Circa 1875, Runk #263 HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 10 One concern of impact to the SCLD will be tree removal and replacement between the levee wall and the installation. The shoreline between the Dock Café and the Bergstein site is dotted with (predominantly) volunteer but mature cottonwood trees. Removal of these trees to accommodate rip rap, vegetation and the walkway will have a visible impact on the shoreline until such time as new plantings are mature. This impact, however, is directly on the shore itself (an area that was historically industrial and lacked vegetation); vegetation removal will not creep into the parkland nor up the hillsides and steep slopes (much larger areas encompassed within the SCLD). The tree replacement plan will help ensure that a diversity of mature vegetation exists into the future. Therefore, though tree removal will impact the area, it will not impact the SCLD in perpetuity. The HPC’s largest concern has been the impact of the overlooks from the river. Overlook #1, on the north, will be blocked from the river by the St. Croix Boat and Packet charter boats. Overlook #2, in the middle and almost directly across the park from the Planing mill ruins, is located in an area where natural vegetation is broken up due to the storm outlet. As noted, the brown-painted concrete wall will be situated between 6’ and 9’ above the water line. The southerly overlook (also painted brown) will be located 3-6’ above the water line. The HPC’s concern is that the structures do not ‘sit lightly’ on the land and water. However, their design is intended to prevent damage from natural and manmade forces. The two southerly overlooks are 20’ long each. The length of these overlooks was chosen to accommodate a bench for trail users. City Code states “[c]ontemporary design for alterations and additions shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment”. While these improvements will be visible from the river, each of these structural improvements will be less than 1% of the nearly two-mile long SCRCP shoreline area and a small fraction of the district’s total half-mile square area. Circa 1897, Runk #169 HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 11 POSSIBLE ACTIONS The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: A. Approve the Design Permit with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed according to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, unless specifically modified by other conditions of approval. 2. Removal of portions of the Army Corps of Engineer’s levee wall is discouraged. 3. The new wall surface texture will match the existing levee wall texture. 4. Protection of the known historical cultural, and archaeological resources will occur in the area during the project. 5. The City shall develop a contingency plan for found historical, cultural and archaeological resources discovered during the project construction. 6. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Deny the requested Design Permit. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Henning’s Cultural Resource Investigation of the St. Croix River Bridge noted city officials and residents came to view the St. Croix as an aesthetic and tourism resource, not as an economic conduit for lumber and this remains true today. The installation of rip rap and vegetation along the shoreline will help stabilize the land for the proposed and existing trail system in an area that is still converting from industrial to parkland use. While steel and concrete is proposed, these materials are specifically designed to provide pedestrians with safe river-viewing opportunities in all seasons while withstanding natural elements. The site of the proposed Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk work is well documented and has been significantly surveyed over the last several decades. The proposed project will be in conformance with previously approved plans and existing site conditions. The installation will not negatively impact historical, cultural and archaeological resources. Therefore, staff recommends conditional approval. Attachments: AMI Civil Plans (Selected Pages) Wall Designs with Railing (4 pages) Wall Design without Railings (4 pages) Overlook Designs (3 pages) Wall Construction Detail HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 12 Landscape Plans (10 pages) Map 1: Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project Boundary, Proposed Fill and Haul Road, and National Register of Historic Places Mapset 1: 1898-1924, 1924-1946, and 1946-1984 Shoreline Maps Image 1: Hersey, Bean & Brown Mapset 2: NRHP-eligible South Main Archaeological District boundary Mapset 3: 1884 and 1888 Sanborn maps, Map 2: TPRG’s Trench #10 P I N E S T W BROADWAY ST S3RDSTS6TH AVE SMAI N ST SCHURCHILL ST W CHURCHILL ST E P I N E S T E H IL L S T µ0 400 800200 Feet Proposed Fill Area Haul Road Stillwater Commercial Historic District Mortiz Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse South Main Archaeological District Cultural Landscape District St. Croix River Stillwater RiverbankRestoration and RiverwalkProject Boundary, ProposedFill and Haul Road, andNational Register ofHistoric Places Map 1 SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER C2.0OVERVIEW SITE PLANCJO12/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 200400CIVIL SITE LEGEND:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.112/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 1020___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER TRAIL EASEMENT SITE PLANCJO CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.212/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 3060SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER SITE PLANCJO CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR---- ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.312/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 3060SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.412/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO 3060CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.512/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO 3060CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.612/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO 3060CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX Aug 15, 2019 - 1:54pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Soldier Pile Wall Exhibit.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SOLDIER PILE WALL EXHIBITSPW11812958/15/19SAJZLMORDINARY HIGH WATER LINEEL = 679.6'GRANULAR BACKFILLTOP OF WALLEL = 683.0'20' STEEL H-PILE,DRIVEN @ 10' O.C.TOP OF WALKWAY &PRECAST PANELSEL = 682.5'BENT STEEL PLATE PILECAP (CONTINUOUS)STEEL CLIP ANGLES FOR CONNECTIONBETWEEN CAP AND H-PILES8" THICK PRECAST CONCRETEPANEL INSTALLED BETWEENH-PILESEXISTING FILL Aug 12, 2019 - 5:11pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk w- railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC11812958/12/19SAJZLMTOP OF WALLEL = 683.0'CONCRETE TOMATCH EXISTINGRIP RAP TRANSITIONEL = 684.0'STEEL H-PILES AND PILE CAP,PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETEWALKWAYEL = 682.5'DECKEL = 689.0' Aug 12, 2019 - 5:12pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk w- railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC21812958/12/19SAJZLMTOP OF WALL EL = 683.0'CONCRETE TOMATCH EXISTINGSTEEL H-PILES AND PILE CAP,PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETETRANSITION FROM RIP RAP TO SOIL FILLED RIP RAP AT ELEVATION 684.0'NOTES:1.RETAINING WALL LOCATED BETWEEN STA 0+50 AND 2+202.FILL VOLUME BEHIND WALL = 280 CUBIC YARDSEXISTING WALL Aug 12, 2019 - 5:12pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk w- railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC31812958/12/19SAJZLM Aug 12, 2019 - 5:13pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk w- railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC41812958/12/19SAJZLM Aug 12, 2019 - 10:46amZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk - no railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC11812958/12/19SAJZLMTOP OF WALL EL = 683.0'CONCRETE TOMATCH EXISTINGTRANSITION FROM RIP RAP TO SOIL FILLED RIP RAP AT ELEVATION 684'-0"EXISTING RIP RAPSTEEL H-PILES AND PILE CAP,PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETE Aug 12, 2019 - 10:47amZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk - no railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC21812958/12/19SAJZLMTOP OF WALL EL = 683.0'CONCRETE TOMATCH EXISTINGSTEEL H-PILES AND PILE CAP,PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTINGCONCRETETRANSITION FROM RIP RAP TO SOIL FILLED RIP RAP AT ELEVATION 684'-0"NOTES:1.RETAINING WALL LOCATED BETWEEN STA 0+50 AND 2+202.FILL VOLUME BEHIND WALL = 280 CUBIC YARDSEXISTING RIP RAPEXISTING WALL Aug 12, 2019 - 10:47amZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk - no railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC31812958/12/19SAJZLM Aug 12, 2019 - 10:47amZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Dock Cafe\Riverwalk - no railing @ Dock Cafe.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RIVERWALK AT DOCK CAFEDC41812958/12/19SAJZLM Aug 12, 2019 - 5:21pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Overlooks\Overlook Options.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA OVERLOOK #1L11812958/12/19SAJZLMSTEEL SOLDIER PILEPAINTED BROWNPRECAST BROWNCONCRETE PANELFILTER STONERIP RAPSOIL FILLED RIP RAPOHWL EL 679.6'TOP OF SLAB EL 690.8'ACCESS FOR BOAT & PACKETGANGWAYSTRANSITION BETWEEN RIP RAPAND SOIL FILLED RIP RAP EL 684.0'11.2' Aug 12, 2019 - 5:20pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Overlooks\Overlook Options.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA OVERLOOK #2L21812958/07/2019SAJZLMSTEEL SOLDIER PILEPAINTED BROWNPRECAST BROWNCONCRETE PANELFILTER STONERIP RAPOHWL EL 679.6'TOP OF SLAB EL 685.8'LIVE FASCINESOIL BACKFILL6.2' Aug 12, 2019 - 5:21pmZ:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\1_Images\Renderings\Overlooks\Overlook Options.dwg SHEET:DATE:REV:DESCRIPTION BY:JOB No:DATE:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c Consulting Engineers P.A. 91 Main Street SUPERIOR, WI 715.718.2193 - amiengineers.com TWIN CITIES - IRON RANGE STILLWATER RIVERBANK STABILIZATION CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER, MINNESOTA OVERLOOK #3L31812958/12/19SAJZLMSTEEL SOLDIER PILEPAINTED BROWNPRECAST BROWNCONCRETE PANELFILTER STONERIP RAPOHWL EL 679.6'TOP OF SLAB EL 683.0'LIVE FASCINESOIL BACKFILL3.4' SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER C6.0---- VEGETATION PLANRRD12/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg 200400Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.112/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg 1020___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- VEGETATION PLANRRDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.212/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg 1020SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER VEGETATION PLANRRDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR---- ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.312/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg 1020SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER VEGETATION PLANRRDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR---- ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.412/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg 1020SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER VEGETATION PLANRRDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR---- ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.512/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg 1020SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER VEGETATION PLANRRDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR---- ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.612/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- VEGETATION PLANRRD 3060Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.712/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- VEGETATION PLANRRD 3060Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.812/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- VEGETATION PLANRRD 3060Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXXCIVIL VEGETATION LEGEND:KEY NOTES SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C6.912/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-VEG.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- VEGETATION DETAILSRRD ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX DIG HOLE FOR PLANTING ROOT BALL.SCARIFY THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OFTHE HOLE BEFORE PLACING THE TREE INTHE PLANTING HOLE. BACKFILL 23 WITHSELECT TOPSOIL BORROW ASSPECIFIED FOR THE SPECIFIC SOILCONDITION ENCOUNTERED AND WATERTHOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS.BACKFILL REMAINING 13 WITHIN 48 HOURSAND CONSTRUCT 4" HIGH EARTHSAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALLAND WATER THOROUGHLY.EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THATTHE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOPOF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THEROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BEREJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OFTHE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. ROOT BALLSDELIVERED WITH THE ROOT FLARE MORETHAN 3" BELOW THE TOP OF THE BALLWILL BE REJECTED.REMOVE ALL WIRE AND BURLAP FROMTOP 13 OF ROOT BALL OR TO 2ND RINGOF WIRE BASKET, WHICHEVER ISGREATER. REMOVE ALL PLASTIC WRAP,TWINE OR ROPE FROM ENTIRE BALL.TAMP SOIL AROUND BASE OF ROOTBALL FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURESO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOTSHIFT. PLACE ROOT BALL ON FIRMUNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL.EXTEND EXCAVATION ANDBACKFILL SOIL TO A POINTDOWNSLOPE EQUAL TO ORLOWER IN ELEVATIONSTHAN BOTTOM OFPLANTING HOLE TO ENSUREADEQUATE DRAINAGE INHEAVY SOILS. GRANULARSOIL MUST BE ADDED AS ABACKFILL IN AREAS OFPOOR DRAINAGE.NOTES:1.DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKENOR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED. HOWEVER DO NOT REMOVE THETERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN.2.SET TREE PLUMB AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS.3.DURING THE SPRING PLANTING SEASON, ANY CONIFEROUS PLANT DELIVERED WITH NEW GROWTH IN ADVANCE STAGE OFCANDLING OUT WILL BE REJECTED. CONIFEROUS TREES NOT FULLY BRANCHED FROM BOTTOM TO TOP WILL BEREJECTED AND THOSE WITH TERMINAL LEADERS EXCEEDING 300 MM (12") IN LENGTH WILL ALSO BE REJECTED.4.STAKE TREES ONLY AS SPECIFIED.5.WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY AS SPECIFIED.6.SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS.7.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANYPOTENTIAL DRAINAGE ISSUED PRIOR TO FINAL PLANTING. INSTALL APPROVED DRAINAGE MATERIALS AS DIRECTED.700 | CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING1" TO 6" DEEPERTHAN ROOTBALLMULCH AS SPECIFIED, DO NOT PLACEMULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OFPLANTING.MULCH AS SPECIFIED, DO NOT PLACEMULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OFPLANTING.DIG HOLE FOR PLANTING ROOT BALL.SCARIFY THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OFTHE HOLE BEFORE PLACING THE TREE INTHE PLANTING HOLE. BACKFILL 23 WITHSELECT TOPSOIL BORROW ASSPECIFIED FOR THE SPECIFIC SOILCONDITION ENCOUNTERED AND WATERTHOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS.BACKFILL REMAINING 13 WITHIN 48 HOURSAND CONSTRUCT 4" HIGH EARTHSAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALLAND WATER THOROUGHLY.EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THATTHE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOPOF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THEROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BEREJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OFTHE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. ROOT BALLSDELIVERED WITH THE ROOT FLARE MORETHAN 3" BELOW THE TOP OF THE BALLWILL BE REJECTED.REMOVE ALL WIRE AND BURLAP FROMTOP 13 OF ROOT BALL OR TO 2ND RINGOF WIRE BASKET, WHICHEVER ISGREATER. REMOVE ALL PLASTIC WRAP,TWINE OR ROPE FROM ENTIRE BALL.TAMP SOIL AROUND BASE OF ROOTBALL FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURESO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOTSHIFT. PLACE ROOT BALL ON FIRMUNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL.NOTES:1.DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKENOR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED. HOWEVER DO NOT REMOVE THETERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN.2.SET TREE PLUMB AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS.3.STAKE TREES ONLY AS SPECIFIED.4.SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANYPOTENTIAL DRAINAGE ISSUED PRIOR TO FINAL PLANTING. INSTALL APPROVED DRAINAGE MATERIALS AS DIRECTED.6.IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A CONTAINER AROUND THE ROOTBALL, SLICE SIDES OF CONTAINER AND REMOVECOMPLETELY. USE FINGERS OR SMALL HAND TOOLS TO PULL ROOTS OUT OF THE OUTER LAYER OF POTTING SOIL, THENCUT OR PULL APART ANY CIRCLING ROOTS.7.TO IMPROVE TRANSPLANTING SUCCESS, THE FOLLOWING VARIETIES SHOULD BE SPRING PLANTED ONLY: BIRCH, BLUEBEECH, ELM, GINKGO, IRONWOOD, OAK, PAGODA DOGWOOD, POPLAR, PRUNUS SP, RED MAPLE, AND WILLOW.701 | DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTINGVEGETATION NOTES:IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A CONTAINERAROUND THE ROOTBALL, SLICE SIDES OFCONTAINER AND REMOVE COMPLETELY.USE FINGERS OR SMALL HAND TOOLS TOPULL ROOTS OUT OF THE OUTER LAYEROF POTTING SOIL, THEN CUT OR PULLAPART ANY CIRCLING ROOTS. REMOVEALL ROPE TWINE AND BURLAP FROM TOPHALF OF ROOT BALL FROM BALLED ANDBURLAPPED SHRUBS.MULCH AS SPECIFIED. DO NOT PLACEMULCH IN CONTACT WITH THE PLANT.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OFSECOND WATERING.SET TOP OF ROOT BALLFLUSH TO GRADE.DIG HOLE FOR PLANTING ROOT BALL. SCARIFY THE SIDES ANDBOTTOM OF THE HOLE BEFORE PLACING THE SHRUB IN THEPLANTING HOLE. BACKFILL WITH MODIFIED PLANTING SOIL AND ADDANY SOIL AMENDMENTS OR FERTILIZERS AS SPECIFIED ANDCONSTRUCT 3" HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS.NOTES:1.DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES, RETAINING NATURAL FORM.SPACE PLANTSACCORDING TO PLANS702 | SHRUB PLANTINGEXTEND EXCAVATION ANDBACKFILL SOIL TO A POINTDOWNSLOPE EQUAL TO ORLOWER IN ELEVATIONSTHAN BOTTOM OFPLANTING HOLE TO ENSUREADEQUATE DRAINAGE INHEAVY SOILS. GRANULARSOIL MUST BE ADDED AS ABACKFILL IN AREAS OFPOOR DRAINAGE.1" TO 6" DEEPERTHAN ROOTBALL EXISTING AT THE END OF THE PERIOD OF THE PERIOD BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD AND IN 1984 KEY D Limestone IZ3J Rubble and Debris - Bluff ---14' 8" ---i Trench 10 r----- .... --- , · .... , \ I ._ , · ... -. ,.,,,. .... , i Slump - Dirt Access Road Loose Pushed Debris St. Croix River Crossing Intensive Literature Search and Phase I /II Archaeological Resources Investigations Washington County, Minnesota ~ - Ditch Loose Pushed Debris Manhole Site 21 WA92 -Hersey & Bean Planing Mill Plan of Mill Ruins ICIIII 0 feet 4 Figure 33 Two Pines Resource Group Field Notes , 2004 - 1 Abbi Wittman From:Minnesota Department of Administration <Admin_Minnesota@public.govdelivery.com> Sent:Thursday, August 01, 2019 2:21 PM To:Abbi Wittman Subject:Register for the 2019 Preserve MN Statewide Historic Preservation Conference! State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) August 1, 2019 Registration is open for the 2019 Preserve MN Statewide Historic Preservation Conference Registration is open for the 2019 Preserve MN Conference in St Cloud being held September 11-13, 2019. Isn’t it time to make preservation matter — or matter more — in your community? Attend the two-and-a-half day conference in downtown St. Cloud to learn, network, share, and strengthen preservation efforts in our state. The conference kicks off with an opening reception on Sept. 11 from 5-8 p.m. Join your colleagues for beverages and hors d'oeuvres and tour the beautiful Stearns County Courthouse, a 1921 Beaux Arts gem designed by Toltz, King & Day with interior murals by Elsa Jemne. Guided tours will be offered from 5-6 p.m. Donovan D. Rypkema will deliver the keynote on the "Economics of Historic Preservation." Get the full schedule on the conference website. Don’t delay — register today! We look forward to seeing you in St. Cloud! mn.gov/admin/shpo | 651-201-3287 | MNSHPO@state.mn.us Stay Connected with the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office: 2 Subscriber Services Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe All | Help This email was sent to awittman@ci.stillwater.mn.us using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: Minnesota Department of Administration · 200 Administration Building 50 Sherburne Avenue · St. Paul, MN 55155 Updated 8/16/2019 Historic Preservation Commission/Staff Work Plan (2019) Draft 2040 Comp Plan Historic Resources Chapter – Fall, 2018 I-3 years: Revise Regulations Consolidate Guidelines & Standards Adopt Standards Analyze and Prioritize Designation Opportunities (Local & National) 3-5 years: Analyze Public Structures Inventory Landscapes Identify & Protect Viewsheds Analyze and Prioritize Designation Opportunities 5-10 years: Complete New Context Studies 2018 Draft Work Plan Community Development Department Draft Work Plan HPC and Historic Resource Specific Projects – Tentative Timeline with Funding Notes 2019 Spring Summer Fall Winter HPC Ordinance Update1 X X Bergstein Buildings Business Plan1 X Lowell Park Pavilion Historic Structure Report3 X HHLS Website2 X X 2020 HPC Ordinance Update1 X Lowell Park Pavilion Historic Structure Report3 X X Host 2020 Preserve MN Conference1 X Assess Sunken Garden3 X Chestnut Plaza and Main Street Design1 Design Guideline Consolidation & Standards Adoption 4 X X Hersey Bean Wall Stabilization South Hill Historic District South Main Arch. District Preservation & Interpretation Plan4 Bergstein Building Design and Remodeling4 2021 Design Guideline Consolidation & Standards Adoption X X 1 Funded 2 Unfunded 3 Funding Requested 4 Grant Funding Eligible Updated 8/16/2019 Bergstein Building Remodeling Chestnut Plaza and Main Street Improvements Repair Sunken Garden X X 2022 Lowell Park/Sam Bloomer Design Teddy Bear Park Historic Structure Report4