The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-07-17 HPC Packet AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North July 17, 2019 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of June 19th, 2019 regular meeting IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. VI. NEW BUSINESS 2. Case No. 2019-18: Consideration of a Design Permit for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project. City of Stillwater, property owner and applicant. VII. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS – NO PACKET MATERIALS 3. Demolition Review VIII. FYI – NO PACKET MATERIALS 4. The Saga of the Stillwater Lift Bridge IX. ADJOURNMENT HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING June 19, 2019 7:00 P.M. Chairwoman Mino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Mino, Commissioners Finwall, Krakowski, Larson, Steinwall, Thueson, Council Representative Junker Absent: Commissioner Walls Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of May 15, 2019 Commissioner Steinwall asked that the page numbers be corrected. Motion by Commissioner Finwall, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall, to approve the minutes of the May 15, 2019 meeting with the page numbers corrected. All in favor, 6-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2019-15: Consideration of a Design Permit for new business signage for the property located at 405 Main Street North in the CBD district. Monty Brine, property owner and Paulette Wentlaff, applicant. The item was pulled from the Consent Agenda and moved to New Business for discussion. PUBLIC HEARING There were no public hearings. NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2019-15: Consideration of a Design Permit for new business signage for the property located at 405 Main Street North in the CBD district. Monty Brine, property owner and Paulette Wentlaff, applicant. Paulette Wentlaff, applicant, stated the proposed site alteration involves the installation of two signs: a) A 27 square foot, wood framed, metal storefront sign to read Magnolias; and b) a 5 square foot, hanging, metal sign to read Magnolias with four lines listing the products and services offered. She explained how she measured for the signs. City Planner Wittman explained the existing sign plan for the building equates to 17 square feet for each tenant. Any excess square footage would require the property owner to apply for a variance. It is unclear whether the South Hill Vintage sign is non-conforming or whether it was permitted. Ms. Wentlaff told the Commission that the current Magnolias sign is temporary. The sign she is proposing is about eight inches narrower but seven inches deeper than the existing sign. She added that she didn’t know about the 17 square foot per-tenant limit when she applied for the permit. The sign without the frame would have been 100 x 24” (about 16.5 square feet). Commissioner Finwall asked how signs are measured. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 19, 2019 Page 2 of 5 Ms. Wittman replied the area visually framed by the sign is considered. In this case that would be to the outside edges of the white frame. Councilmember Junker noted that it is important to maintain consistency in a building like this with multiple tenants, otherwise everyone will request bigger and bigger signs. Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve a Design Permit for new business signage for the property located at 405 Main Street North, with the five staff-recommended conditions, including limiting the size of the sign to 17 square feet following the sign plan for the building. All in favor, 6- 0. Case No. 2019-12: Consideration of a Design Permit for an exterior remodel. Property located at 1435 Curve Crest Boulevard in the BP-I district. Packard Properties, LLC, property owner and Stiglich Construction, Inc., applicant. Ms. Wittman stated the applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit for a 5,812 square foot addition faced in EIFS to match the existing painted rock face block building. With certain conditions, the proposed addition meets the City’s site layout, lighting and drainage standards, however the application design is inconsistent with the design guidelines, as two different exterior materials are proposed. The HPC should discuss with the applicant alternative design options, including painted rock face construction or the installation of EIFS on the primary portion of the building. If approved, the HPC should add a condition of approval specifically pertaining to the materials to be used. Robert Stiglich, Stiglich Construction, stated this is a very small addition on a very small building. To go to all rock face or all EIFS would add a significant cost that would make the project not feasible. The EIFS will have a clean look and will be on the back of the building. The addition will allow the trash enclosure, which is now outside, to be inside. They had to do additional improvements to meet Watershed District requirements, which added to the cost. Commissioner Larson asked about the colors proposed to be used. Mr. Stiglich replied the accent band will be a lighter color than the other surfaces. Commissioner Larson remarked that depending on the sun angle, the difference in texture may not be noticeable. His initial reaction was that the building should be all in EIFS or all rock face. But considering that the addition will not be significantly visible from the street, if a reveal could set off the two materials and separate the two surfaces, it may be something the Commission could potentially accept. Commissioner Finwall said she likes the fact that the addition will help with issues of exterior storage and trash containers. It would not be very visible from the public right of way. She has no concerns with an extension of EIFS and feels it would match up OK particularly since it’s in the back. Chairwoman Mino agreed that she could support the proposal if it includes a reveal joining the two surfaces. Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to approve a Design Permit for an exterior remodel of property located at 1435 Curve Crest Boulevard with the five staff-recommended conditions, approving the materials as proposed by the applicant, adding Condition #6 stating, “there shall be a reveal between the two materials, to be reviewed by the City Planner.” All in favor, 6-0. Case No. 2019-13: Consideration of a Design Permit amendment for the property located at 232 Main Street South in the Downtown Review District. Yaniv Abotbul of Happy Bridge, property owner. Ms. Wittman stated that Yanni Abotbul has submitted a Design Permit application for the installation of four, eight-foot 6000K LED lights to be installed under the existing awning. The lights have been installed. Staff has determined this to be a major modification to the original Design Permit. The existing, 6000K LED lights are a hazard to pedestrians and motorists and their appearance is not in harmony with adjacent development. Therefore, the application does not conform to the Downtown Design Review District guidelines nor the standards set forth in City Code. However, if the property owner is willing to reduce the Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 19, 2019 Page 3 of 5 bulb temperature to 3500K and place the light fixtures higher up into the awning, then the lighting may conform to the guidelines and standards. Chairwoman Mino asked if the applicant has indicated they need this lighting for safety reasons. Ms. Wittman responded they have not indicated that. Commissioner Larson commented that glowing awnings are not in harmony with existing guidelines. Councilmember Junker said no matter what kind of bulb is used, the lighting under the awning would still be nonconforming. Commissioner Finwall recognized that the applicant is not here to explain the situation. The lighting as proposed/installed does not look attractive nor does it meet historical guidelines. The applicant has the opportunity for lighting inside the store. Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Finwall, to deny a Design Permit amendment for the property located at 232 Main Street South on the basis that the installed lighting is contrary to the requirements of City Code, is a hazard to vehicles and pedestrians, and is not in harmony with adjacent development. All in favor, 6-0. Case No. 2019-14: Consideration of a Design Permit for a home remodel for the property located at 515 Third Street South in the Neighborhood Conservation District. ELIN Marco Group, property owner and Patrick Schmeichel, applicant. Ms. Wittman stated that the property has historically been utilized as a three-unit property; it is the new property owner’s intention to rehabilitate the house into a single family dwelling prior to selling the home. While the exact construction year is not known, the structure appears on the 1884 Sanborn map. The structure once contained a full-width front porch. As noted in the 1996 City of Stillwater Architectural- History Inventory Form, the house was a Queen Anne with open porches on the front, which “have been removed or have become a part of the house itself...the house has window changes and little historical physical integrity.” The specific request is a front porch addition, façade improvements, side alteration, a small five foot addition in the rear of the home, and the addition of a garage. With certain conditions, the project conforms to the standards set forth in City Code as well as the applicable Conservation District guidelines. Staff recommends approval with seven conditions. Commissioner Steinwall asked what material would be used for the top gable. Patrick Schmeichel, applicant, replied they will try to use materials that are as authentic as possible and hope to use wood shakes. Commissioner Larson asked what would be done with the foundation. Mr. Schmeichel replied they will try to use existing stone where possible. In places the wood siding will be brought all the way down over existing standard masonry block, they will try to mate the two surfaces. Commissioner Finwall asked if the corner board on the sides and around the windows will all match. Mr. Schmeichel responded they will try to use a white, teal and black palette with different color trim around the windows. The roof and all windows will need to be replaced. Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Thueson, to approve a Design Permit for a home remodel for the property located at 515 Third Street South, with the seven conditions recommended by staff. All in favor, 6-0. Case No. 2019-16: Consideration of a Design Permit for new windows and solar panels on south roof. Property located at 107 Chestnut Street East in the Downtown Review District. Matt Wolf, property owner. Commissioner Larson recused himself from the discussion and vote due to a business relationship with the applicant. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 19, 2019 Page 4 of 5 Ms. Wittman reviewed the case. Matt Wolf of CVII Holdings purchased the historic armory in 2018 and plans to rehabilitate the structure into rental units, office space and commercial area. The building is in reparable condition but many of the systems and components are failing. He submitted a design permit for structural alterations, including replacing all windows except some windows on the back of the building, and the installation of 100 solar panels on the southern roof of the building. The solar panels will be visible from the Third Street right of way for less than a half block. They will not be visible from the front façade. Staff recommends approval with eight conditions. Chairwoman Mino asked if there is glare from the solar panels. Mr. Wolf replied the panels will have as matt a finish as possible. They are pursuing tax credits for the project so if either of these elements harms the tax credits they will be changed. He provided a sample of the window to be used. Commissioner Finwall noted it is important to help businesses become more economically resilient. She commended Mr. Wolf for trying to match the panels as much as possible to blend in. Mr. Wolf stated the tax credits help bridge the financing gap. Motion by Commissioner Krakowski, seconded by Commissioner Steinwall, to approve a Design Permit for new windows and solar panels on the property located at 107 Chestnut Street East, with the eight conditions recommended by staff. All in favor, 5-0. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS HPC Ordinances Amendment Ms. Wittman stated that the City has been awarded two grants for 2019-2020 projects and events. She explained the anticipated timelines and associated work. One of the grants will allow the City to hire a consultant to assist with updating the HPC ordinances. Prior to starting the project, staff will work with the HPC and the City Council to rewrite the demolition ordinance. This project will start in July. Statewide Historic Preservation Conference Ms. Wittman stated that the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has approved a grant for Stillwater to host the annual statewide historic preservation conference in September 2020. The City will work directly with the SHPO to choose the location, breakout sessions, tours, etc. The Stillwater Chamber of Commerce, the Main Street Independent Business Association, and the Stillwater Area Convention and Visitor’s Bureau (CVB) have committed to being a partner or a consulting partner to this conference. Staff would like at least a few members of the Commission to participate on the steering committee. FYI 116 Harriet Street North Ms. Wittman stated the City Council upheld the denial of a demolition permit and authorized a designation study. Last night Councilmember Weidner asked the Council to reconsider this decision. The Council will reconsider the authorization of the study at its July 2 meeting. Councilmember Junker said he believes the main reason for reconsidering the authorization was spending $5,000 on a study of a garage. 615 Broadway Street South Ms. Wittman stated the 106 Group demolition designation study has been completed. It found that the structure is not historically significant. The Council voted to reject the findings of the study. City code says if the Council does not approve the designation study within 180 days of the denial, the demolition permit is automatically approved. The Code also says if the Council does not designate the structure after the preparation of a designation study then the demolition permit may be approved. If the Council would like to move forward with local designation of the structure, public hearings with the HPC and with the City Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 19, 2019 Page 5 of 5 Council would need to be held. She has sent the issue to the State Historic Preservation Office and the Minnesota Historical Society per code requirement. She also will consult the Planning Commission in July, to review it for conformance to the Comprehensive Plan. She reviewed the study findings which basically state that because the house does not meet any of the preservation site criteria as an individual property, it is not recommended for individual designation as a heritage preservation site. She will send the study to the Commissioners. This issue will be placed on the July meeting agenda but may run up against a notification deadline, so she may have to ask the Council to clarify their intention in rejecting the study. Bergstein Warehouse and Shoddy Mill Ms. Wittman informed the Commission that the Council directed City Administrator McCarty to prepare a State Capital Budget funding request to help rehabilitate the Bergstein Warehouse and Shoddy Mill buildings. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Finwall to adjourn. All in favor, 6-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:54 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink, Recording Secretary PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2019-18 REPORT DATE: July 11, 2019 MEETING DATE: July 17, 2019 APPLICANT: City of Stillwater LANDOWNER: City of Stillwater REQUEST: Design Permit approval for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project LOCATION: East Nelson Street to a point near the southern city limit in Bridgeview Park DESIGNATION: NA DISTRICT: Downtown Design Review District Stillwater Cultural Landscape District South Main Archaeological District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner INTRODUCTION The City of Stillwater will be conducting a riverbank restoration project between Nelson Street East and the southern city limit. As part of the project, the City intends to construct a Riverwalk from Nelson Street East, at the end of the existing levee wall, to the Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse. Additionally, overlook platforms will be constructed. The purpose of the project is to stabilize the shoreline while provide separating users to provide pedestrian safety in an area where there is significant pedestrian, cyclist, and vehicular congestion. SPECIFIC REQUEST A Design Permit for the Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk project. ANALYSIS City Code Regulations (Standards) and Guidelines HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 2 City Code Sections 22-7 and 31-325(f) require the HPC make the findings that the project will meet the standards of design review, secure the purpose of the zoning code, the comprehensive plan and the heritage preservation ordinance. The City Code further states the HPC shall take the following applicable standards into consideration:  Site layout: The orientation and location of buildings and open spaces in relation to the physical characteristics of the site, the character of the neighborhood and the appearance and harmony of the buildings with adjacent development.  Landscaping: o The location, height and material of walls, fences, hedges, trees and screen plantings to ensure harmony with adjacent development or to conceal areas, utility installations or other unsightly development. o The planting of ground cover or other landscape surfacing to prevent dust and erosion. o The preservation of healthy mature trees. o Usable open space in terms of quantity and quality of landscaping.  Traffic circulation, safety and congestion.  Drainage: o The effect of the site development plans on the adequacy of the storm and surface water drainage to both the site and adjacent property. o Connection with existing drainage system.  Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources.  Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. City Code Section 22-7, Subd. 6(3) indicates the following applicable guidelines shall be used to evaluate applications:  Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure or site and its environment or to use a property for its originally intended purposes.  The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features must be avoided when possible.  All buildings, structures and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.  Changes, which may have taken place in the course of time, are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right and this significance shall be recognized and respected.  Contemporary design for alterations and additions shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment.  Whenever possible new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in a manner that if the additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 3 Furthermore, City Code Section 31-209 indicates the HPC must take into consideration special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the City Council. The Downtown Design Review District guidelines indicates the following applicable guidelines:  Highlight important architectural features and structures by use of distinctive landscaping.  Visually and physically buffer parking lots from adjacent buildings and pedestrian walkways with groupings of plant materials.  Frame and edge existing and proposed building where feasible with appropriate types of plant material to achieve human scale. Proposed Improvements The project boundaries extend along the St. Croix River shoreline for nearly three- quarters of a mile. Extending from the southeastern edge of the Stillwater Commercial Historic District, approximately one-third of the project is located in the Downtown Design Review District. Connecting with the Army Corps of Engineers levee wall at Nelson Street East, the walkway will consist of a solider pile wall to accommodate a 10’ wide concrete walkway. The riverside of the walkway will separate users with a black, pipe rail fence to match the existing MNDOT installed railing in this location. Riverside riprap will remain where new riprap with vegetation will be installed to an elevation of 684’. The wall will carry, along the river, around the Dock Café. From this point to the Shoddy Mill and Warehouse site, the 10’ pedestrian at-grade walkway will continue alongside the Loop Trail with vegetated riprap below. HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 4 Three concrete overlooks will be installed. The first of the overlooks will be located at St. Croix Boat and Packet loading dock. The primary purpose of this overlook is to provide for pedestrian loading and unloading in an area that is both off the street and the Riverwalk. A secondary function of the overlook is to connect existing and future gangways. The other two overlooks will be over existing stormwater outlets in Bridgeview Park. Details of the concrete finish have not been submitted to the City; it is anticipated the City will have this information by the HPC’s July 17, 2019 meeting. Area Historical, Cultural and Archaeological Resources A portion of the Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk project extends from the easterly edge of the Stillwater Commercial Historic District to the northerly boundary of the Mortiz Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse site, adjacent of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible South Main Archaeological District. The attached Map 1, Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project Boundary, Proposed Fill and Haul Road, and National Register of Historic Places, shows the designated and eligible historical, cultural, and archaeological resources in the vicinity of proposed fill and the haul road (which is the established Lower Loop Trail and an existing dirt access road located on top of the a sanitary sewer main). As indicated, the project work will occur within the NRHP-eligible South Main Archaeological District as well as within the NRHP-eligible Stillwater Cultural Landscape District. No work will be conducted in the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. Resource Impact Stillwater Commercial Historic District: Work proposed will connect to the Army Corps of Engineers floodwall near the site of the former Bonson & Cover Warehouse. This is an area that, since 1924, has been filled. This can be seen on the attached Mapset 1, 1898-1924, 1924- 1946, and 1946-1984 Shoreline Maps, produced by the Army Corps of Engineers as part of the HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 5 Historical Reconstruction of the Riverfront: Stillwater, Minnesota. The area impacted was historically under water. Mortiz Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse: As noted, these structures were relocated to this site as part of the St. Croix Riverway project. The riverbank in this area was built up and filled prior to 1946; the site was stabilized prior to the building’s relocation. South Main Archaeological District: This post-contact site once encompassed the Hersey & Bean Lumber Company complex constructed around 1853. Mill ruins mark the foundations of an office, sawmills and a planing mill. The complex was sold for salvage in 1906. Numerous wooden structure and wood decks and platforms, sometimes constructed on piers over the river, were all located within the proposed project’s boundary. An image of the site is shown on the attached Image 1, Hersey, Bean & Brown. As noted by Two Pines Resource Group, LLC, (TPRG) the Phase I/II archaeological investigations of the Hersey & Bean Sawmill and Planing site consisted of the excavation and clearing of foundations, and mapping of all the excavated features. As much of the main sawmill complex was a wood-framed structure constructed on piers, the excavation focused on features that were likely to have archaeological signatures, such as those structure’s identified on the Sanborn maps as having stone foundations. Mapset 2 identifies the NRHP-eligible South Main Archaeological District boundaries. TPRG’s found “the ruins of the mill exhibit excellent integrity of location, materials, and association” and further recommend “appropriate level of treatment of theses cultural resources be determined”. However, TPRG’s study defined the horizontal and vertical boundaries of each site, noting the mill structures were documented in photographs and on historical maps. As shown on the attached Mapset 3, 1884 and 1888 Sanborn maps, and supported by Two Pines’ research, these foundations were located greater than 50’ from the river shoreline, west of the existing dirt access road proposed to be used as the haul road and City of Stillwater sanitary sewer main. This can also be seen on Map 2 of TPRG’s Trench #10. Stillwater Cultural Landscape District: The NRHP-eligible Stillwater Cultural Landscape District addresses the relationship between the natural and built environments. The proposed project encompasses the installation of rip rap and vegetation. Additionally, there will be in the installation of three concrete observation area which will be stained to match the shoreline materials. Lastly, there will be a black metal guardrail in front of the Dock Café and around the three observation areas. The material installations along shoreline will keep the shoreline looking natural; this is consistent with other fill material placed along the shoreline in this area. Additionally, railing (previously installed by MNDOT as part of the SCRCP) exists within the project boundary; an extension would help create a more uniform appearance along the riverway. While concrete is proposed, this additional material is specifically designed to provide pedestrians with safe river- viewing opportunities. Henning’s report noted city officials and residents came to view the St. Croix as an aesthetic and tourism resource, not as an economic conduit for lumber. This remains true today. POSSIBLE ACTIONS HPC Case no. 2019-16 Page 6 The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: A. Approve the Design Permit with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed according to the plans on file in the Community Development Department, unless specifically modified by other conditions of approval. 2. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Deny the requested Design Permit. With a denial, findings of fact supporting the decision must be provided. C. Table the request for additional information. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The site of the proposed Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk work is well documented and has been significantly surveyed over the last several decades. The proposed project will be in conformance with previously approved plans and existing site conditions. The installation will not negatively impact historical, cultural and archaeological resources. Therefore, staff recommends conditional approval. Attachments: AMI Plans (Selected Pages) Map 1: Stillwater Riverbank Restoration and Riverwalk Project Boundary, Proposed Fill and Haul Road, and National Register of Historic Places Mapset 1: 1898-1924, 1924-1946, and 1946-1984 Shoreline Maps Image 1: Hersey, Bean & Brown Mapset 2: NRHP-eligible South Main Archaeological District boundary Mapset 3: 1884 and 1888 Sanborn maps, Map 2: TPRG’s Trench #10 SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRXXX XXX ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER T1.0---- TITLE SHEETCJO12/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-TITLE.dwg CIVILSHEET INDEXKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDESIGN TEAMOWNEROWNER CONTACTCITY OF STILLWATERSHAWN SANDERSSSANDERS@CI.STILLWATER.MN.US216 4TH ST NSTILLWATER, MNT1.0-1.1 TITLE SHEETC0.1-0.2 GENERAL NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTIONC1.0-1.6 DEMOLITION PLANC2.0-2.7SITE PLANC3.0-3.9GRADING PLANC4.0STORM MANAGEMENT PLANC5.0STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)RIVERBANK STABILIZATION ANDRIVERWALKSTILLWATER, MNVICINITY MAPPLAN ABBREVIATIONS:NOT ALL ABBREVIATIONS SHOWN ARE USED IN THIS PROJECTPLAN SYMBOLS:PLAN HATCHES:CIVIL ENGINEERAMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.KAREN KEENAN, PE, LEED APKAREN.KEENAN@AMIENGINEERS.COM3640 TALMAGE CIR. SUITE 200VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55110651.472.1274PLAN LEGEND:SURVEYORAMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.RON ALWIN, PLSRON.ALWIN@AMIENGINEERS.COM3640 TALMAGE CIR. SUITE 200VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55110651.344.8783RENDERING SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER C2.0OVERVIEW SITE PLANCJO12/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 200400CIVIL SITE LEGEND:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.112/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 1020___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECRELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER TRAIL EASEMENT SITE PLANCJO CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.212/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 3060SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER SITE PLANCJO CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR---- ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.312/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg 3060SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.412/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO 3060CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.512/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO 3060CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX SHEET:DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:DATE:JOB No:REV. BY:REV:DATE:DESCRIPTION COPYRIGHT ~ AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS P.A. : 2006c I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE:LIC. No: Consulting Engineers P.A. 3640 TALMAGE CIR. VADNAIS HEIGHTS 651.344.8783 - amiengineers.com SUPERIOR - IRON RANGE MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER C2.612/19/2018 11:37 AM Z:\2018\181295 Stillwater Riverbank Stabilization and Riverwalk\Civil\3_CAD\181295-SITE.dwg SAM BLOOMER ST. STILLWATER, MN 5508207.11.2019ECR181295RIVERBANK STABILIZATION AND RIVERWALK CITY OF STILLWATER ---- SITE PLANCJO 3060CIVIL SITE LEGEND:KEY NOTESKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ELI RUPNOW ___________XXXXX P I N E S T W BROADWAY ST S3RDSTS6TH AVE SMAI N ST SCHURCHILL ST W CHURCHILL ST E P I N E S T E H IL L S T µ0 400 800200 Feet Proposed Fill Area Haul Road Stillwater Commercial Historic District Mortiz Bergstein Shoddy Mill and Warehouse South Main Archaeological District Cultural Landscape District St. Croix River Stillwater RiverbankRestoration and RiverwalkProject Boundary, ProposedFill and Haul Road, andNational Register ofHistoric Places Map 1 EXISTING AT THE END OF THE PERIOD OF THE PERIOD BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD AND IN 1984 KEY D Limestone IZ3J Rubble and Debris - Bluff ---14' 8" ---i Trench 10 r----- .... --- , · .... , \ I ._ , · ... -. ,.,,,. .... , i Slump - Dirt Access Road Loose Pushed Debris St. Croix River Crossing Intensive Literature Search and Phase I /II Archaeological Resources Investigations Washington County, Minnesota ~ - Ditch Loose Pushed Debris Manhole Site 21 WA92 -Hersey & Bean Planing Mill Plan of Mill Ruins ICIIII 0 feet 4 Figure 33 Two Pines Resource Group Field Notes , 2004 -