The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-02-11 Joint Board PacketAGENDA Stillwater City and Town Joint Planning Board City Council Chambers 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 5:00 p.m. Monday, February 11, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 24, 2018 MINUTES 4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.01 Request by Mark Guenther for a rezoning related to the subdivision of property at 8313 & 8393 Marylane Avenue North. 6. MISCELLANEOUS 6.01 Status of the Minar Neighborhood moratorium on land subdivision 6.02 Status of the City of Stillwater’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan update 7. ADJOURNMENT Stillwater City and Town Joint Planning Board Regular Meeting Minutes October 24, 2018 Present: Stillwater Town Board Members Dave Johnson and Sheila-Marie Untied, City of Stillwater Council Members Ted Kozlowski and Tom Weidner. Staff present: Stillwater Community Development Director Bill Turnblad Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:04 PM. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Weidner moved to accept agenda as presented. Kozlowski seconded the motion, which passed 4-0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Weidner moved approval of the minutes as presented. Kozlowski seconded the motion, which passed 4-0. NEW BUSINESS Rezoning for Nelson property - Case No. 2018-55 Turnblad summarized his report of October 16, 2018. Steve and Kathy Nelson have requested a rezoning of their property and a lot split. They plan to subdivide their 2.51 acre lot on 7770 Minar Lane North into a 1.31 acre parcel for their homestead and a 1.20 acre vacant lot for sale. The rezoning to RA, Single Family Residential is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. And, the proposed lot sizes are fairly consistent with the large lots in the surrounding neighborhood. Turnblad also said that the soils on the vacant lot were tested and will support a standard septic drainfield. Furthermore, all development standards applicable to the two parcels would be met as proposed. Turnblad stated that a moratorium preventing subdividing any lots in the Minar Neighborhood, including the Nelson property, recently went into effect. But, the Nelsons submitted their lot division request prior to the effective date of the moratorium. Therefore, the rezoning and lot split requests must both be reviewed against existing development standards. Therefore Turnblad recommended approval of the rezoning with the three conditions found in his report. Joint Board Minutes October 24, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Johnson opened the public hearing. Steve Nelson said the staff report and presentation explained his request and that he had nothing further to add. There being no further testimony, Johnson closed the public hearing. Untied asked about the split vote by the City Planning Commission to recommend approval of the request. Turnblad explained that two Commissioners voted against approval. Their dissenting votes were cast for several reasons. But, primarily they objected to what appears to be a spot zoning, and there was also concern about potential impact upon the Brown’s Creek system if all the lots in the neighborhood were allowed to split to one acre with on-site septic systems. Weidner mentioned that the purpose of the moratorium was in part to study whether a minimum lot size of 1.0 acre should be established, or whether a 2.5 acre lot size would be more appropriate. If it is 2.5 acres, no more septic systems would be introduced into the neighborhood except the one requested by Nelson. He also said that when the appropriate lot size is determined and a corresponding zoning district is added to the City’s zoning ordinance, the whole neighborhood will be rezoned. This could well include both Nelson parcels, so there may be no “spot zoning” issue after the moratorium. Johnson encouraged the City to find a way to prevent the Nelson property from being spot zoned when the moratorium ends. Weidner moved to approve the rezoning request with the three conditions found in the report by Turnblad. Kozlowski seconded the motion, which passed on a 4-0 vote. MISCELLANEOUS Johnson announced to the Joint Planning Board that he is not running for re-election to the Township Board. And said that one of his prouder achievements in his 30 years of elected service was his involvement in encouraging an agreement between the City and Township on annexation matters. Because of annexation requests, the relationship between the Township and the City was troubled. But, an amicable relationship grew out of the Annexation Agreement, which was a ground breaking agreement in the state that is now used as a model. ADJOURNMENT Weidner moved for adjournment, which was seconded by Kozlowski. The motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Bill Turnblad Acting Recording Secretary Planning Report REPORT DATE: February 7, 2019 CASE NO.: 2018-68 HEARING DATE: February 11, 2019 TO: Joint Planning Board DEVELOPER: Mark Guenther, Fenway Land Company REQUEST: Review of Marylane Meadows Preliminary Plat & Rezoning COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LMDR, Low/Medium Density Residential ZONING: AP, Agricultural Preservation REVIEWED BY: Shawn Sanders, City Engineer; Tom Ballis, Assistant Fire Chief; Karen Kill, Administrator, Brown’s Creek Watershed District Planning Commission; Park Commission, City Council REPORT BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director BACKGROUND Mark Guenther, Fenway Land Company, plans to develop two small acreage parcels on Marylane Avenue North (8313 & 8393 Marylane Avenue North) with a total size of 4.49 acres. The preliminary plat for the project, to be known as Marylane Meadows, shows 11 single family lots. In order to develop the property at the proposed density, a rezoning has been requested from the current AP, Agricultural Preservation District to RB, Two-Family Residential. SPECIFIC REQUEST The Joint Planning Board is asked to: 1) Consider approval of the rezoning of the property from AP, Agricultural Preservation to RB, Two-Family Residential; and 2) Review and make comments on the preliminary plat for Marylane Meadows. Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. REZONING Mr. Guenther has requested that the property be zoned RB, Two-Family Residential. It is currently zoned AP, Agricultural Preservation, which is the temporary zoning classification assigned by the Minnesota Municipal Board when the area was annexed. The expectation is that when development occurs, the property would be rezoned to a classification that is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The future land use map of the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan shows that the site is guided for Low/Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The LMDR classification is intended for developments at a density of 4.4 to 9.7 units per acre. The Zoning Districts that are consistent with this density range are CCR, RB and CR. Therefore, the requested rezoning to RB, Two-Family Residential is consistent with the future land use map of the Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning is also compatible with the neighborhood. The CalAtlantic neighborhood being developed directly across the street from Marylane Meadows is also zoned RB, Two- Family Residential. II. PRELIMINARY PLAT The 4.49 acre parcel is proposed to be subdivided into 11 single family lots. Two homes currently exist on the small acreage parcels. A. Minimum Dimensional Standards: RB District The front setbacks of the homes in Block 1 are 30 feet. But, in Block 2 the minimum setback is 35 feet for the northerly home and increases to 45 feet for the most southerly home. This is done in recognition of the approximately 45 foot setback of the existing home on the property to the south. Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 3 Massing Standards The proposed lot dimensions and building envelope details are all compliant with the massing standards of the RB Zoning District. B. Civil Engineering 1) All of the civil engineering plans shall be found satisfactory to the City Engineer, or revised to his satisfaction, prior to release of the final plat from City offices for filing with Washington County. 2) All electrical and communication utility lines are required to be buried. 3) The drainage and utility easements associated with the underlying plat will need to be vacated before the final plat for Marylane Meadows is filed with the county for recording. Application for the vacation will need to be submitted together with the final plat application. 4) The developer will be responsible for paying development impact fees based upon the net developable acreage of the project, which is 4.40 acres (4.49 gross minus .09 for the trail outlot). The fees will be payable prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. a. Trout Stream Mitigation Fee: $6,283/acre (2019 fee). Total of $27,645.20. b. Trunk sewer and water fees: $11,274/acre (2019 fee). Total of $49,605.60. C. Tree Preservation & Landscaping Two applicable development standards exist for trees on this project: 1) street trees and 2) tree preservation. 1) Street trees The subdivision code requires an average of three trees per lot along the street, though they are to be planted outside of the platted right-of- 1 Width is measured between side lot lines at right angles to lot depth at a point midway between front and rear lot lines 2 Average distance between front and rear lot lines. 3 Total of both side setbacks must be a minimum of 15 feet, with a minimum of 5 feet on each side. RB Standard Min. requirement Proposed Lot area: single-family 7,500 sf 17,140 sf min. Lot area: two-family 10,000 sf 17,140 sf min. Lot width: single-family1 50’ 65’ min. Lot wide: two-family1 75’ 65’ min. Lot depth2 100’ 268.6’ min. Lot frontage on public road 25’ 65’ min. Front setback: house 20’ 30’ min. Front setback: garage 30’ 30’ min. Side setback 5/15’3 7.5’ min Rear yard setback 25’ 140’ min. Maximum lot coverage 50% (25% bldg.; 25% other) TBD Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 4 way4. 33 trees are shown on the landscape plan for the 11 lots. All species are indigenous, acceptable, likely to do well on the site, and are located outside of the platted right-of-way. 2) Tree preservation a. The City’s environmental ordinances allow 35% of the tree canopy to be removed without any replacement. b. The tree preservation plan shows the removal of 34.48% of the canopy. So, no replacement is required. D. Environmental Issues 1) Wetlands – The property has no wetlands. 2) BCWD – A grading permit will be required. 3) Floodplain – The property includes no FEMA identified floodplains. 4) Shoreland Overlay District – The property does not lie within a shoreland overlay district. E. Park & Trail Dedication The Comprehensive Plan shows neither trail, nor park land required on the site. However, a trail segment across the property would be very beneficial. It would connect the Settler’s Glen trail system through the proposed subdivision to the sidewalks in Rutherford Station and then to the regional trails on Manning Avenue and the Brown’s Creek Trail. (See map on next page.) This would create a number of trail loops for the neighborhood. Therefore, at staff’s recommendation an outlot is proposed to be platted and improved with the bituminous trail segment. The standard park and trail fee for this project would be due on 9 of the 11 lots. The existing homes are exempt. The park fee for a single family home is $2,000 and the trail fee is $500. Therefore, if no improvements were needed, $22,500 would be due for park and trail fees. However, the developer’s cost of building the trail (excluding land costs for Outlot A) would be credited against the park and trail fee for the project. So, the balance of the park and trail fee would have to be submitted to the City prior to release of the plat from City offices for recording with Washington County. The Park Commission reviewed the subdivision and recommends requiring the connecting trail segment to be built by the developer and credited against the required park & trail fees. 4 City Code Ch. 32, Subd. 6(3)q Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 5 Trails in Settler’s Glen Neighborhood F. Miscellaneous The Joint Planning Board is required by the Orderly Annexation Agreement to review and comment on all preliminary plats in the annexation area, and to approve or deny rezoning requests. Typically that occurs prior to City Council consideration of the case. But, due to scheduling difficulties, the Council considered the requests first. Two of the conditions that the Council attached to their approval are that if the Joint Planning Board recommends changes of substance, the preliminary plat will have to be reconsidered by the Council. The other directly related condition is that the approval of the preliminary plat does not become effective unless the Joint Planning Board approves the requested rezoning. ALTERNATIVES The Joint Planning Board has several available alternatives: 1. Approve rezoning – Comment on the preliminary plat and approve the rezoning. 2. Deny – If the Joint Planning Board finds the rezoning to be inconsistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, or inconsistent with the neighborhood, or other reasons, deny the rezoning request. Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 6 RECOMMENDATIONS Planning Commission The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary plat with the conditions found below. (Note: Condition 10 has already been completed.) 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the following plans on file with the Community Development Department, except as may be modified by the conditions herein:  Preliminary plat Sheet 3 of 7 Dated 12/20/18  Preliminary removals plan Sheet 4 of 7 Dated 12/20/18  Preliminary site & utility plan Sheet 5 of 7 Dated 12/20/18  Grading & erosion control plan Sheet 6 of 7 Dated 12/20/18 2. All civil engineering plans shall be found satisfactory to the City Engineer, or revised to his satisfaction, prior to release of the final plat from City Offices for filing with Washington County. 3. A Development Agreement found satisfactory to the City Attorney and City Engineer must be approved by the City Council prior to commencing any tree removal or grading on the site, and prior to holding a pre-construction meeting with the City Engineer for the project. 4. At the time of final plat application, the developer must submit a written request to vacate the underlying drainage and utility easements on the property. And such vacation request needs to be approved by the City Council prior to release of the final plat from City offices for recording with Washington County. 5. The developer shall submit a grading permit application to Brown’s Creek Watershed District, and the permit must be issued prior to submitting the application to the City for the final plat. Any permit conditions that the City Engineer finds necessary to include in the final plan set shall be included in the final plat application package. 6. The developer must construct bituminous trail over Outlot A connecting Marylane Avenue to the Settler’s Glen tail system. The developer’s cost of building the trail will be credited against the park and trail fee for the project. The balance of the bid cost of construction (if found satisfactory to the City Engineer) will be credited against the total park and trail fee and the balance must be submitted to the City prior to release of the final plat from City offices for recording with Washington County. 7. All electrical and communications utility lines shall be buried. This shall be specified in the plans submitted for final plat approval. 8. The Developer will be responsible for paying the Trout Stream Mitigation Fee of $27,645.20 and trunk sewer and water fees of $49,605.60. If these fees are not paid in 2019, rates will increase and the higher rates will apply. These fees will be due prior to release of the final plat for recording with the county. 9. If the Developer desires to have a neighborhood entrance monument for the subdivision, plans for it must be included within the final plat application materials. Otherwise, such a sign will not be permitted in the future. Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 7 10. A tree removal plan, with inventory if required by the City, and code compliant landscaping/tree replacement plan must be submitted and found satisfactory to city staff prior to submission of final plat application materials. 11. Materials may not be stored in the critical root zone of trees to be saved, nor may equipment or materials be leaned or stacked against trunks of trees identified to be saved. 12. Approval of the preliminary plat will not become effective until the developer submits an application for rezoning of the property to RB, Two-Family Residential and the City Council adopts an ordinance approving that rezoning. 13. If an Accessory Dwelling Unit is desired for any lot within this subdivision, the future owner of that lot will need to make application for the Special Use Permit and receive approval from the Planning Commission prior to constructing the detached garage and Accessory Dwelling Unit. Park Commission The Park Commission unanimously recommended that the developer be required to develop a bituminous trail on Outlot A that connects the Settler’s Glen trail system to Marylane Avenue. And that the cost of the trail construction be credited against the required park & trail fees of $22,500. The balance of the park & trail fees would be due and payable to the city prior to release of the final plat from city offices for recording at Washington County. City Council The City Council approved the preliminary plat with the conditions found above. They also added two conditions regarding the Joint Planning Board review. 1) if the Joint Planning Board recommends changes of substance, the preliminary plat will have to be reconsidered by the Council; and 2) the approval of the preliminary plat does not become effective unless the Joint Planning Board approves the requested rezoning. It should be noted that the Council will not hold its hearing on the rezoning until the final plat is submitted. City staff City staff recommends approval with the 12 remaining conditions from the City Planning Commission recommendation and the 2 additional conditions from the City Council. cc Mark Guenther Attachments: Zoning Map Development Plans bt Marylane Meadows February 7, 2019 Page 8 f:\jobs\7741 - 7760\7757 - rivard addition\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\7757_prp.dwgSave Date:12/20/18FENWAY LAND COMPANY13925 Fenway Blvd. NorthHugo, MN, 55038of3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE,Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comMARYLANE MEADOWSStillwater, Minnesotaenvironmentalengineeringsurveying···PRELIMINARY PLATThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:12/20/1840361DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1809KCM12/20/18VICINITY MAP73LEGENDOWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER: OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER: SITE DATA MARYLANE MEADOWS / / / / / / ( I i" Carlson 1 · environmental ~ M C • • engineering c a1n . surveying / / / / 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 Fax: (763) 489-7959 www.carlsonmccaln .com Save Date: 1 20 18 t :\jobs\77<1 1 ·7760\77S7 •rtvardaddltlon\cadc3d\englneertng\prell mlnary\7757..11 r.dwg I hereby certify that this plan , specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota / / I I / I 1- 1 t!1 I ~ U) I 1- / ~ ;i II f11!tt : "'~~ I II I ~ I" I" 1 I I 1 I I "'°"f HJ, I I I I I I Revisions : Print Name : Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Signature:~ A..&# , Drawn :~ 1. Designed:~ Date : 12/20/18 License#: 25063 Date: 12/20/18 INSTALL SILT FENCE AFTER " I DITCH GRADING IS COMPLETED as I I I I I I I I I I I FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 i ~I lliH _!_ "1 "II infill "I : TII I 11 I !ii u MARYLANE MEADOWS Stillwater, Minnesota GRAPING PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE ------ CURB 8l1UMIN0US CONCRETE 10' CONTOUR 2' CONTOUR ,-?--;----;-., ._ ____ '_ _ _j --MO------- v.£Tl.ANO LINE ------ PROPOSED __ .,. __ ----- STORM SEVIER ----<<--------<<-- FD/CE EMERGENCY OYERFlOW SILT FENCE lREE FENCE .... ~···++ 000.0 ......... lillillillillillillillillillil . --- ,c I ::!'l' if I I I z ... + ~ I I 15 30 60 I I BENCHMARK I 1. MNOOT GSID Station 133746 (Ncmed: S11UWA1ER 2 AZ MK) I Elev.= 949.04 (NAVO 88) 2. MNOOT GSIO Station #103258 (Named: I SQUARE) Elev.• 911.93 (NAW 88} I PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 of 7 ----,-/ ;\ )\ -(- -> ~I' '-c._1 I --- 'f-~~\-- \ \ ,,.--- ' s ')JI I / _ SB 1 _j-/ 'I> + --,/ ~++_ -~Q)2 I I / q I / I I ' :, \ ' I I I I I I I I I I I / ,,-.1,···-,. '-' I I I I -> \; > \ I l -----,> LI I -> I I I I I I -1-1 ' :, ~ ,' I I' I I ' 'I ' I I I -- I I I I I I I I ,, J _ -----.,. II ~ I \ I I I I I I I 4 --_> .. >- =--=> ;;-=--->·>-c~i ---<< ~ --<_-_,..._ ----_ '· -<-._ < -------;;,----- ----«----_;:;,,<----<<- (/)Carlsqn ~,J McCain • environmental • engineering • surveying 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763) 489-7900 Fax: (763) 489-7959 www.carlsonmccain.com s,:ive D.ite: 01/31/19 f:\jobs\7741 -7760\7757 -rivard .iddition\cad c3d\engineering\prelimin.iry\7757_tree_preserv.ition.dwg / I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota <----<<---<<- Print Name: Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E. Signature: ~ "1.-~'z( , Date: 1/31/19 License#: 25063 5 s '' SB 2 I I I I I I I I I-I -- I I I I I ' I I ~-I I --+ -+ ' 1++++4- i-~ -~ + t/ t::-+ 1+-=t-1 +;c -+ 'k + + -t;/_+ -> _I_ --> -1 <<- Drawn: KRO Designed: BJK Date: 1/31/19 -T<1-~' I l!:J ,, ~ en 1-:c: (!) -i Revisions: 1. ' <<-1- 9 >- ir , I 1/ :='.I I:------\- 1// 7 t l: /Ii ; J~/~ 1:-_ -' 'I -r I,.' I I I ! '"'" I --..... r I ·. - -,,' ., -- ---91.f.-·------~ / '··,,' / (---- ,I :, 'I : I : I I I t "-2 ~~ _/ ·,., __ -I _3 ) 4 -\ I I L' I I : I 'I I I <::i I 11-. C:- 1 r -1 -- I I \l'~r,__- ---1 1 'c _ --I I y_:}.:.;,, 11 I ,_ -->-- '. :/A ::) :, I ( I I I I I I I I I I ___c;;rs11(2,2 -, I ----\ : I I ~-I I ,, 'I )I,,! ,-:\ -, -J _J-~; l I, \ 1 ,-l ,I I ~- ' \ii 1\ \:'\'1 ·1 L : I I I I I I I I I I L I ~II; I '. ----~ llf ~1 I I -I I I \·-..,.,..-ii-·,_. ,·. -, ,.'.'1· ( -·-+ 1~--I -J1(, A_ =-, ----~-~ I- I ,-- r<'--- h/bU -_, I ,,- ' I~ - I _J 1 I '-/ ,- - I _,_ -11 --1r· ,, --,,,, --.,.,~\ ---1'l' -~1; ""' ---, \,-. I <µ --~------_-- -~,---j cir -__ ~- ~ --,~ ' I '·. --• ', ·----------I 11 ,, J----1~ I ---- ------1 _j _ -J---~ i\ I 're-'-=-=-'c:~ -_:z en ~~-=-=_-{,, _L. -X:----_ _::, __ I -~,-;cp ------Fr:; (,q-,::-5,--~--;;-+ ,;:--=-----c,,. ' ;..-" _, . / _ :,-L_-x .,_.,_I ___ ,,.......__~n 1-1 E! MARYLANE A-VENUEff\J -, -<1;., _, ---I ---1-----::I_ -_ -_I ---I-----1-_"-. -1- -;, -,-, -> -_;, -- -</ ~ -~----------::;;._ ~~-..::...r=-=--=----= ~ ------_/ -~<..._----~ LEGEND PROPERTY LINE CURB BUILDING SE"TBACK LINE Bl"TUMINOUS GRAVEL CONCRETE EXISTING 1 O' CONTOUR --'1CC1-- 2' CONTOUR ----se2---- SILT FENCE 1REE FENCE 1REE LINE 1REE SAVE AREA TREE REMOVE AREA PROPOSED ----'.j()C,---- '392 • • • • • • • • • "'-.A.AA.A.AJ" ~ \:++++) + + * + FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 -I // ' " -- -I I ' "----<r- I +.-V _2, I -<< I I /\ I ,, ,;:-·::2 I L I /1--( r- / I 11 ~I TREE TOTALS TOTAL 1REE AREA TOTAL 1REE AREA REMOVED TOTAL TREE AREA SAVED 1.74 AC 0.60 AC (34.48%} 1.14 AC (65.52%) MARYLANE MEADOWS Stillwater, Minnesota -<, -> ' -"-- ·----, -- , I ,.I /' '/ ) ,- I I -I,/' ./', /, j I ' ./ ' > ~1 />/ ,-- -d,oc· -~ -/ I ____.<::' --~ '-1 : <<---<<-__:'._"""~"' -<< I: 0 50 N 100 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK 200 1. MNDOT GSID Station ;1!33746 (Named: STILLWATER 2 AZ MK) Elev.-949.04 (NAVO 88) 2. MNDOT GSID Station #103258 (Named: SQUARE) Elev.-911.93 (NAVO 88) 1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of 1 SEE "TYPICAL STREET SECTION"ON THE GRADING DETAILS PLAN FOR SEED/SOD IN THE BOULEVARDofof3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100Blaine, MN 55449Phone: (763) 489-7900Fax: (763) 489-7959www.carlsonmccain.comf:\jobs\7741 - 7760\7757 - rivard addition\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\7757_landscape.dwgSave Date:01/31/19environmentalengineeringsurveying···Revisions:1.MARYLANE MEADOWSStillwater, MinnesotaFENWAY LAND COMPANY13925 Fenway Boulevard NorthHugo, Minnesota 55038Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaJames A. Kalkes RLA1/31/1945071JAK JAK1/31/19PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANL11·OVERSTORY / EVERGREEN TREES··MINIMUM OF TWO TREE IN THE FRONT YARD PER LOT=22 TREES··MINIMUM OF ONE TREE IN THE REAR YARD PER LOT=11 TREES(11 Lots x 3)=33 TREES=33 TREES·TWO TREES IN THE FRONT YARD AND ONE TREE IN THE REAR YARD SHALL BE INSTALLEDBY THE BUILDER/HOMEOWNER.CITY of STILLWATER LANDSCAPE CODEQUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN.PLANTREE WRAPBACKFILL MIXPAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGEWHITE FLAGGING (TYP.)DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE8" 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS8' STEEL TEE POST-4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCHFROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALLREMOVE BURLAP & ROPEUNDISTURBED SUBSOIL4 INCH DEEP SAUCERNOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE.12"6"2'(MIN.)6"6"3 REQUIRED AT 120BOTANICAL NAMEDECIDUOUS TREESKEYCOMMON NAME2.5"BB5SIZEROOTQTY.2.5"BB6Gleditsia triacanthos SHADEMASTER HONEYLOCUST2.5"BB8Celtis occidentalisHACKBERRY2.5"BB10Acer rubrum 'Nothwoods'NORTHHWOODS MAPLEvar. inermis 'Shademaster'Quercus bicolorSWAMP WHITE OAKWOHLHBRMLANDSCAPE LEGENDSTRAIT LEADER NO "V" CROTCH2.5"BB4Acer saccharumSUGAR MAPLESM15'50'INSTALLHEIGHTMATUREHEIGHT10'50'15'50'14'50'14'50' NATIVE WET PRAIRIE MN SEED MIX 34-371 (OLD BWSR W3) WETLAND FRINGEMN SEED MIX 33-261 (OLD BWSR U6) COMMERCIAL TURF - SODHIGHLAND SODMNDOT 260MN SEED MIX 25-131 (OLD MNDOT 260) &ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT INTENDED (USE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETSODDED, OR RETENTION BASINS FOR SLOPES OVER 3:1) MESIC GENERAL ROADSIDEMN SEED MIX 25-131FOR GENERAL STABILIZATION (USE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETOF PAD AREAS FOR SLOPES OVER 3:1)HARDWOOD MULCH (NATURAL COLOR) 1/4 yd PER TREESHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SEED MIXTYPESYM.SEED MIX LEGEND (FOR ALL SHEETS)