HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-10 CPC PacketTHE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
The Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, July 10, 1995, at 7 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
Approval of Minutes of June 12, 1995.
AGENDA
1. Case No. DP/SUP/V/95-47. Continuation of a design permit and special use permit for
construction of structure containing three residential units with a 16 x 16 office space and a
variance to the side yard and front yard setbacks (0 ft. requested, 15 ft. required for the side yard
and 0 ft. requested and 10 ft. required for the front yard) and for parking requirements (5 spaces
required, 2 spaces requested) at 311 South 3rd Street in the CBD, Central Business District.
w
+• Brian Larson, applicant.
2. Case No. V/95-49. A variance to the sign height (25 ft. required, 30 ft. requested) for the
replacement of the Stillwater Inn sign at 1750 West Frontage Road in the BP-C, Business Park
Commercial District. Tim Balstad, applicant.
3. Case No. SUP/95-50. A special use permit to operate a three -dog kennel at 1656 South Greeley
Street in the RA, One Family Residential District. Stillwater Towing, Richard Ritzer, applicant.
4. Case No. V/95-51. Modification to previously approved sign program for placement of a 64
square foot sign at 14328 North 60th Street (on Tuenge Drive) in the BP-C, Business Park
Commercial. Kennedy Transmission applicant.
5. Case No. SUP/95-52. A special use permit for the construction of a 12' x 20' storage shed at 900
North Owens Street, Stonebridge Elementary School, in the RB, Two Family Residential
District. John Johnson, applicant.
6. Case No. SUP/95-53. A special use permit for business operation of Massage Therapy out of
home at 1202 West Myrtle Street in the RA, One Family Residential District. Lauren A. Fouks,
applicant.
7. Case No. V/95-43. A variance to the side yard setback (14 ft. requested, 30 ft. required) to
,IN expand an existing garage at 212 Sixth Street So., in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Brent and Wendy Johnson, applicants.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 12, 1995
Present: Chairman Jerry Fontaine, Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott
Dorothy Foster, Rob Hamlin, Kirk Roetman,
Don Valsvik, and Darwin Wald
Absent: Terry Zoller
Others Steve Russell, community development director,
and Susan Fitzgerald, planning
Mr. Russell introduced Ms. Fitzgerald to the commission members.
Chairman Jerry Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Darwin Wald, seconded by Don Valsvik, moved approval of the minutes of
May 8, 1995; all in favor.
Case No.SUP/94-6. Review of revised grading/drainage and landscape plan
-� for Good Samaritan Center, 119 N. Owens St. in the RB, Two Family
Residential District. Good Samaritan, applicant.
City Attorney David Magnuson and City Engineer Klayton Eckles were on
hand for the discussion. Mr. Elliott excused himself from the discussion
due to his former relationship with SEH.
Mr. Russell told commission members that since the Jan. 9, 1995, Planning
Commission meeting when neighbors expressed concerns about the
landscaping and drainage plans, the retaining wall and other issues, staff
has met with neighbors and Good Samaritan representatives on at least 5
different occasions.' Those meetings have resulted in 17 conditions of
approval. Several other issues have come to light since then, he said. One
neighbor is not satisfied with the landscape plan. The drainage design has
been approved by the city staff, Good Samaritan and affected neighbors; a
drainage easement is currently being prepared.
Joanne Loer, 1114 N. William St., showed a video of conditions prior to
construction, during construction and after a March 11, 1995, snowfall.
She asked that each of the neighbors to allowed to address the
,-� commission individually.
In addition to Mr. and Mrs. Loer, the following made comments: Mr. and Mrs.
Gerald Shepardson, 1208 N. William; Keith Hoffbeck, 1110 N. William St.; a
resident at 623 W. Wilkins St.; Mr. and Mrs. Robert Kent, 122 E. Hazel St.
Mr. Kent asked why the language in the 17 conditions of approval listed for
the commission's consideration was different than the language in a
"working memorandum" that had been developed after the meetings with
the neighbors.
The commission then went through the language of the 17 conditions.
• Snow removal -- neighbors wanted language that snow shall be
"removed," rather than "contained."
• Retaining wall -- Mr. Russell said there is no language in the conditions
of approval pertaining to the wall. The wall meets code and is really part
of the overall grading and drainage plan. Regarding standards for retaining
walls, Mr. Eckles said walls over a certain height must be designed by an
engineer.
• Employee parking -- neighbors wanted language added that employees
not park on William or Wilkins streets or Stillwater Avenue. It was noted
that there currently is some on -street parking because the parking lot has
not been accessible during construction.
- On -site storm sewer runoff -- Mr. Valsvik suggested adding language
that an easement for the Hoffbeck property shall be obtained. Mr.
Swanlund, 718 W. Hickory St., asked about the long-term maintenance of
the drainage system and who would be responsible if it turns out the
system isn't adequate. Mr. Magnuson said language could be added regarding
permanent responsibility for storm water drainage.
- South and east wing door -- neighbors wanted language that the doors be
solid wood and used for emergency purposes only.
- Sound barriers -- Mr. Russell explained that the emergency generator
won't be screened for noise. If there's an emergency, the generator will be
used.
y
• Damage to trees -= Mr. Russell said there have been some damaged trees
that are not included in the landscaping plan. It was suggested adding
language that the damaged trees be "repaired" before final approval is
given, and that newly planted trees be guaranteed for three years.
• Property values -- Mr. Russell noted this is a permitted use under the
zoning ordinance and therefore property appraisals are not the city's
responsibility. Mr. Magnuson pointed out that the issue of devaluation
generally does not favor adjourning property owners; the law favors
private rights.
Mr. Hamlin said when the Planning Commission reviewed the plans for the
addition a year ago, commitments were made. However, what ultimately �..
was built is contrary to what the Planning Commission approved. He said
he felt the retaining wall should come down. If "big-time' mistakes are
made, "big-time" measures should be taken to correct those mistakes. Ms.
Bealka said that is Mr. Hamlin's personal opinion and doesn't reflect the
opinion of the Planning Commission as a whole; mistakes have been made,
she said, and we have to go on from there.
- Certificate of occupancy -- neighbors requested that the certificate not
be issued until all issues have been resolved. Neighbors also requested
that they be notified beforehand and be allowed to review the paperwork
that is sent to the state of Minnesota. It was agreed to have Mrs. Loer
review the paperwork on behalf of the neighbors.
Mr. Magnuson said the discussion seemed to indicate three major concerns:
continued responsibility for storm water; that all damages, including
ress be repaired; and that landscaping be guaranteed for a three-year
D
period.
Mr. Fontaine, seconded by Mr. Hamlin, moved to table approval and hold a
special meeting with the neighbors and Good Samaritan representatives.
All in favor. The meeting was set for June 26.
Case No. V/95-38. A variance to the back yard setback (5 feet required, 0
feet requested) for construction of a garage/carport at 720 N. Martha St.
in the RA, Single Family Residential District. TJ Builder, Kevin Junker,
applicant.
Mr. Junker appeared regarding the request.
Mr. Elliott noted that with a 0 setback, Mr. Junker would have to get an
easement or written agreement from neighbors in order to maintain the
building. He also expressed his concern that the commission is often
making decisions based on sketches that are not drawn to scale. He
suggested requiring' a two -foot setback as a condition of approval. Mr.
Junker said a two -foot setback would be acceptable.
Mr. Elliott moved approval with the condition of a two foot setback (three
foot variance) and that drainage be maintained on the property. Mr. Wald
seconded the motion; all in favor.
Case No. SUP/95-39. A special use permit to conduct a three -bedroom bed
and breakfast and special events at 210 E. Laurel St. in the RB, Two -
Family Residential District. Douglas and Deborah Thorsen, applicants.
Mr. and Mrs. Thorsen appeared regarding the request. They said they have
reviewed the conditions of approval. Mr. Thorsen questioned the condition
that both owners shall be on site during all special events. It was agreed ~'
that condition should be that one of the owners be on site.
Neal Casey, 107 E. Laurel, expressed his concern about the impact on the
residential area. He questioned what type of special events were planned.
Robert Olson, 613 N. Third St., reiterated that concern, as well as a
concern about parking problems that might be created by special events.
Mr. Thorsen assured the neighbors that the intent is to operate a "quiet"
bed and breakfast. Special events would be in keeping with the historical
character of the residence. He also noted that there is on -site parking for
10 cars, and he welcomed neighbors to come to him with any complaints
they might have in the future.
Mr. Roetman asked whether the Thorsens _would be agreeable to reducing
the number of allowable special events; they said that would be
acceptable.
Mr. Hamlin moved approval amending the condition pertaining to special
events to allow 12 per year, not to exceed one per week, and changing the
condition that both owners be on site during special events to at least
own of the owners on site. Mr. Roetman seconded the motion; all in favor.
Case No. SUP/95-40. A special use permit to conduct a three-room bed and
breakfast and restaurant with outside dining at 114 E. Chestnut St. in the
CBD, Central Business District, Mark Hanson, applicant.
Mr. Hanson appeared regarding the request. He said he planned to operate
the business as is has been in the past. Other than the signage, nothing
would be different. He asked what needed to be shown in the site plan for
the outside seating area. Mr. Russell explained the plan should show the
number of seats, tables, access to the residence, etc.
Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mr. Wald, moved approval; all in favor.
Case No. SUP/95-41: A special use permit to expand a restaurant use to
the gas station/bait shop at 806 S. Main St. in the RB, Duplex Residential
District. Gary Carlson, applicant.
Mr. Carlson said the request is to expand the restaurant to the gas
station; the pumps have been removed. He expressed a concern regarding N.W.
the condition that the parking lot be repaved and striped within a year. He
said he did not own the whole building and repaving the lot would be
costly. He said he would patch the lot and stripe it. Mr. Elliott suggested
that at a minimum the lot should be sealcoated; that was agreeable to Mr.
Carlson.
Mr. Valsvik, seconded by Mrs. Foster, moved approval as conditioned; all in
favor.
Case No. V/95-42. A variance to the front yard setback (17 feet requested,
30 feet required) to construct a 9-foot tall fence at 911 Fifth Ave. S., in
the RB, Two Family Residential District. Richard and Sheridyn McClain,
applicants.
Mr. McClain and his mother-in-law appeared regarding the request. Six -
feet is the maximum allowable fence height. Mr. McClain said because of
the way the house is situated, a six-foot_ high fence is not adequate to
provide desired privacy. The trolley comes by the home continually, with
people looking into the home on a regular basis. No neighbors object to the
plan, and no one's view will be obstructed, he said.
The original request was for a trellis across the top of the garage, with
the fence along each side. The trellis is considered a structure, thereby
requiring the front yard setback. Mr. Elliott questioned the need for the
trellis.
Mr. Roetman moved approval with the condition that the fence be no more
than 9 feet high and consist of two separate section, with no connecting
beam and no trellis. Mr. Wald seconded the motion; all in favor.
Case No. V/95-43. A variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required,
14 requested) to expand an existing garage at 212 Sixth St. S. in the RB,
Two Family Residential District. Brent and Wendy Johnson, applicants.
Mr. and Mrs. Johnson appeared regarding the request. Architect Tim Stepan
also was present. Mr. Johnson said the family wants to stay in the
neighborhood but is running out of closet/storage space etc. ,The proposed
addition will be historically consistent with the 120-year-old residence.
The request is for a 20 foot setback, rather than the 14 indicated in the
planning review, he said.
There was some discussion as to moving the location of the addition in
order to meet setback requirements. Moving the addition to the side would
require reshaping a patio/retaining wall, Mr. Johnson said. Moving the
addition to the back would reduce a play area and would require excavation
due to a three-foot grade at the rear of the property.
There also was some discussion as to the location of the Johnson's front
property lines. Mr. Elliott noted it appeared the Johnson's driveway had
become part of the street.
An original motion to deny the request, made by Mr. Elliott and seconded by
Mr. Roetman, was withdrawn. Mr. Elliott later moved to continue the
request until the property line issue is clarified and to allow members to
view the property. The motion to continue the request was seconded by Mr.
Wald; all in favor.
Case No. SUP/95-44. A special use permit to operate a dog kennel at 235
N. William St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Rodney and Kathy
Nord, applicants.
Mr. and Mrs. Nord appeared regarding the request.
Paul Dickinson, 234 N. Everett St., expressed his concern that the Nords
might breed dogs if the license is issued. Mr. Landgreen, 222 N. Everett St.,
suggested that the dogs should be spayed.
Mr. Nord said they have absolutely no intention of breeding the dogs and
said he would be willing to sign a paper to that effect.
Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mr. Valsvik, moved approval with the condition
that there be no breeding on site. All in favor.
Case No. V/95-45. A variance to the landscaped setback requirement (20
feet required, 17'6" proposed) to add a 14-car parking area to the west
side of an existing lot at 1465 Stillwater Blvd. in the BP-C, Business Park
Commercial District. A. Peter Hilger, applicant.
Mr. Hilger and Dick Zimmerman were present regarding the request. Mr.
Hilger said the right-of-way has been replatted. The new lot is primarily
for customer convenience. He said that some portions of the final
landscaping for the entire complex hadn't been completed pending the
outcome of this issue.
Mr. Wald, seconded by Mr. Valsvik, moved approval as conditioned; all in
favor.
s +R.
Case No. SUP/95-46. A resubdivision of a parcel located at 501 N. Main St.
in the CBD, Central Business District. Harold D. Kimmel, applicant.
Mark Desch appeared before the commission. He and Mr. Kimmel have
purchased a parcel of adjoining property from MnDOT; the request is to add
the parcel to the applicants' parcels.
Mr. Hamlin, seconded by Mr. Elliott, moved approval; all in favor.
Caae No. DP/SUP/V/95-47. This case was continued.
Case No. SV/95-48. A street vacation for that portion of Elm Street
abutting Lots 3 and 4, Block 4, and Lots 4 and 1, Block 3, Carli and
Schulenberg's Addition in the City of Stillwater. Jessica Lange, applicant.
George Lange appeared on his sister's behalf. Mr. Lange said his sister has
purchased the triplex on Elm Street next to the home she purchased on
Fourth Street. She plans to convert the triplex to single-family use and
would like to remove the aggregate on that portion of Elm Street and sod
the vacated street area to make the two properties more like one property.
The portion of Elm Street in question leads to a ravine. Mr. Russell noted
the "street" is not a designated pathway and the nearby ravine was not
identified in the Comprehensive Plan. It was also noted there is access to
the ravine from several other nearby streets.
Donald Empson said he didn't think the City should vacate any streets. He
questioned giving away public lands to a private interest. Once a street is
vacated, he noted, it is vacated forever. Richard Kilty pointed out that Ms.
Lange could request that the street be developed, which would result in
more deterioration of the area than turning it into a lawn would cause. Mr.
Kilty also noted that he lives in a neighborhood with two platted streets
that are not used; the streets have become dumps, he said.
Mrs. Bealka, seconded by Mr. Wald, moved approval with the condition that
a storm sewer easement be provided if needed. Vote was 7-1 in favor; Mrs.
Foster voted no.
Case No. V/95-32. Continuation of a variance request to the rear yard
setback (20 feet required, 4 feet proposed) for construction of a 24x24
foot garage at 819 W. Olive St. in the RB, Two -Family Residential District.
Arthur and Lori Bjorkman, applicants.
The revised plans meet the required sideyard setback. However, to meet
front yard setback would require constructing the garage right up to the
base of an existing tree, Mr. Bjorkman said. Mr. Elliott noted the location
of the garage would be consistent with the neighbors to the south.
Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mr. Wald, moved approval, noting the Bjorkmans
had made concessions regarding the sideyard, the location is consistent
with neighbors, and the location of the tree prevents moving the garage
any farther back on the property. All in favor.
Other business
Mr. Russell gave a brief update on the timetable for the Comprehensive
Plan.
Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mrs. Bealka, moved to adjourn the meeting at
10:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recording secretary
`/
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO DR/SUP/V/95-47
Meeting Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 311 South Third Street
Comprehensive District: Downtown Plan Area
Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: Don Nolde
Type of Application: Design Review
Project Description
Design review for a special use permit, design permit and a
variance request for construction of three residential units and
office space.
Discussion
The project is three residential units with a 16' x 16' office in
a three-story structure. The bottom level includes a one bedroom
unit and two covered parking spaces. The second level is a
residential unit and the office space. The third level is a
1300sf residential unit.
The structure is set in the northwest corner of the site with no
setbacks to the west or north. The structure is setback 24 feet
from a rear retaining wall and within three feet of the south
property line.
Access to the parking is provided over driveway easement to the
adjacent property. The neighbor to the south has expressed
concern for the proposed design. From a review of the driveway
location and position of the garages it is difficult to see how
the garages will be easily entered.
A window well providing air and light to the front level is shown
to the front of the property in the city street right-of-way.
The city engineer said the windows would not be allowed because
of pedestrian safety and maintance.
The building design is a simple box with three large lower
windows matched by three small third level windows. The front
building material is brick facade with stucco accent panels and
rockface block base. The rockface block base would continue
around the entire building while the brick facade only appears in
the front (east) side of the building. A metal cornice is shown
on the front of the building only. Window details are not
provided. Awnings are shown over the three bottom front windows,
office and third level entry. A small 214" x 214" projection
sign is shown off the front of the building.
Conditions of Approval
The request was presented to the Historic Preservation Commission
at the July 6, meeting. Along with staffs recommendations are
HPC's suggestions for conditions of approval:
1. Prepare a plan that provides accurate access to back parking,
including use of neighbors easement.
2. Window wells will be removed from the plan.
3. Submit to staff details of material used and colors of
proposed sign.
4. Submit to staff sample of materials and colors for the
exterior building, windows, trim and awning.
5. All exterior sides of the building shall be the same color.
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned.
Findings
The proposal meets the intent of the CBD zoning ordinance.
Attachments
Application form
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
!!
COMh1UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
_ Conditional or
Special Use Permit
_ Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No.
Date: S ' 2 (o • ti S
Fee Paid 47-&=
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EA W
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
FEE
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
with any application.
Address of Project 12 k k /? . ITM (1-0 yT • Assessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District Description of Project 6,g a*trtrC1 6AtJetky
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used."
Property Owner QD*S Noupe,
Mailing Address !bk` Gr.TAft�L(-
U-IA N--rN1t ' SS'Ofn2
Telephone o. _ `f j5q , !A It
Signature
Representative ?�ZfRN j Af2eori
Mailing Address egeFM I LIP-�, w f <.,-,0 tMSS>
1�01
Telephone No.
Signature
I
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action.
Lot Size (dimensions) 115, x I sq:-fr."
Total Land Area -fi20D 't -'—
Hight of Buildings: Storiesi
Principal I-Attbfif-> q"
el)"A c�, y.k!• Cot►
�, etcvAfio�n,
� htyrit s
La bAck (FAIA) D
Date of Public Hearing is -
Total Floor Area sq. ft.
Proposed floor area �il2utkCa\3?Dy f.= 3q(op'-(pA7�,E�tvn�-?
Building Coverage . JXILV� =
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces
—two ceucvus J 'Wh ,-j s�tuS
0
0
y�
1
i
1
--,.
I 1
— 44
�I I
I
Y
� �
I
yl+d]Li
14'
1n�wsvi
L
�NI1 W.�1odd ��4'i�J Ti
ii�7L
fill
v
till -
_�
N
n PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/95-49
Planning Commission Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 1750 West Frontage Road
Zoning District: BP-C Business Park - Commercial
Applicant's Name: Gunnar Balstad
Type of Application: Variance for height of sign
Project Description:
The applicant is requesting a variance to the sign height (25 ft
required, 30 ft requested) for the replacement of the Stillwater
Inn sign at 1750 West Frontage Road.
Discussion•
The request is to place the new sign in the same place the
^ existing sign is now, only five feet higher. The location is
approximately five feet below the parking lot grade and would
appear to be the standard 25 feet high from the road. The
applicant is reluctant to move the sign to the front of the
building because of the conflict between the 15 foot setback
requirement and the three full grown Colorado Spruce trees that
are there now.
The existing sign is 130 square feet, the proposed sign is 100
square feet. The sign material and color are Best Western's
prototypical sign image.
Recommendation
Approval.
Findings
The sign as proposed meets the intent of the Sign Ordinance.
Attachments
Application Form
Sign Proposal
"IN
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
n
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
T Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
7 -A!�
Case No.
Date:
Fee Paid: $0
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EA W
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
FEE
the applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
.with any application.
Address of Project 1,160 W t'Il t1 ylpr
Zoning District Description of
ect
Assessor's Parcel No. / Q �(O�
30
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used."
Property Owner Go &kus
Mailing Address 11 o 'vJ Fi2 oyt/f G _
Telephone No. — 0
Signature •-tan
Representative ( Irv-, BI,L.5T7scp
Mailing -Address (-1$o %[ CW yystA 4 t✓ e4
511(,L,'A � �
Telephone No. Q 30 — ( 3 o o
Signature!
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action.
Lot Size (dimensions) x sq. ft:
Total Land Area
Hight of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Date of Public Hearing is
Total Floor Area sq. ft.
Proposed floor area sq. ft.
Building Coverage sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces
U
`»E m
M ♦�
V. o V
l x C �`xd b ipg of$ tCg�` �p Ey I� 41
G[ 4s C�
on
„a
k�
of
fl
b
�h
' m\
n`
h ♦lip 'p= �� � Pg dx
0
co
M
m M
J
U
Z
V)
J
m Z
D
o O N U
Z W
U
Q O
O {y
8 I W Off.
I rdmilO
ƒ
! !.
� 6!
: % G
R§
`■
�`
�
I'
}4 1
|
k
!
It
�
{ k
§ :
§ !
/
I
\2
|.
\\�
)
|
2ktz
/
.
—,—�--
\
-lo
|
&.�"
%}
2
�o
CA%
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No. SUP/95-50
Planning Commission Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 1656 South Greeley Street
Zoning District: RA, Single Family Residential District
Applicant's Name: Stillwater Towing Inc
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
Project Description
Request for kennel in residential district.
Discussion
The request is for a kennel (three dogs) in a residential district (Stillwater Towing,
Inc). The request has been referred to the animal control office for review.
The planning department has received no complaints regarding keeping dogs at the
residence.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachment
Kennel Lic No.
Fee Paid
($50 annual fee)
KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION
Kennel Owner (applicant) Property Owner (if different from applicant)
Name Stillwater Towing Inc. - Rick Ritze)game
Address 1656 S Greeley St Address _
Phone No. 43 9 - 5 744 Phone No.
Date Applied 6 - 7 - 9 5
Kennel means any place where three or more dogs or three or more cats over four months of age
are kept, raised, sold, boarded, shown, treated, groomed or a place where animlas are bred or
offered for sale at any age or in any number in the regular course of business.
Kennel licenses. Kennels are not permitted without a conditional use permit. No kennel license
may be isseud or renuewed unless the applicant has a valid conditonal use permit for the faiclity.
a. Existing kennels must be in compliance with this ordinace within 60 days after its effective
date.
Number of dogs/cats at site '.
For each dog:
Breed Name Sex Age Color
St Bernard Daisy Ritzer Fenale 27 Mo_ Brown/White
St Bernard Desi Ritzer Femadte 24 Mo Brown/4hite
St Bernard Dozer Ritzer P"Lale 36 116 Brown/White
Where are animals housed? 1656 S Greeley S t .
iow location on a map.
Signature of property owner
(if different from kennel owner)
Planning Commission Action
Date
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FOPN11
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No.� U
Date: S
Fee Paid:
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
FEE
'"tee applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
„ith any application.
Address of Project
Zoning District _
Description of Project,
Assessor's Parcel No.
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used."
Property Owner
Mailing Address
Telephone No.
Signature
Representative
Mailing Address
Telephone No.
Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action.
Lot Size (dimensions) _
Total Land Area
Hight of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
Date of Public Hearing is
x sq. ft.
Feet
Total Floor Area sq. ft.
Proposed floor area sq. ft.
Building Coverage sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW /
Case No. V/95-51
Planning Commission Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 14328 North 61 st Street
Zoning District:
Applicant's Name: Kennedy Transmission
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description.
Request to construct second Tx 16' sign on rear of building (west).
Discussion
The request is to construct a 4' x 16' sign on the west elevation of the building. A
sign program was previously approved for the building that allowed one sign on the
front of the building (facing east). A copy of the Master Building Sign Program is
attached. The proposal is not consistent with the sign program. The program allows
one sign per business, maximum height of sign 24 inches and individually lighted
letters. If this request is approved, additional similar requests can be expected.
Recommendation
Denial
Attachments
r
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
D sign Review Permit
tanned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
Case No.
Date: S
Fee Paid: D
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
FEE
►e applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
ith any application.
Address of Proj
Zoning District
Z` 3�-d' Ale, C'X M —s;-- ssor's Parcel No.
6, Description of Project tr�^__5
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used."
Property Owner ,%�6��'_Tl�`S Representative
Mailing Address %il '4vE Mailing Address / ��f,� /U6. rk r�1.
.'5z-4 e_r —76M - / lv - 5 S C Y �
Telephone y S/ - Telephone No. 6 / — =`?Y-0J
•o
Signature Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action.
Lot Size (dimensions) x sq. ft.
Total Land Area
Hight of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Date of Public Hearing is
Total Floor Area sq. ft.
Proposed floor area sq. ft.
Building Coverage sq. fr.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces
-10
6010+� A14:AzetAC..
NAZI m INc ?4tvwac10
l8�c 3jy,. �ac.uA�izEd stews
�i5 ode'cto � ,BGItE
(2-0.) M/sc.
66,OX tFrd- Nc��e
1 ter :.
a a ..
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: MARCH 1, 1991
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REGARDING SIGNS
AT RIVER HEIGHTS AUTO MALL.
The Project Owner is requesting a modification to the Conditions of Approval
regarding conditions that were placed in the project when the variance for the
free standing 100 square foot sign was approved for the project (letter
attached). The supports for the free standing sign in front of the center have
been constructed. The conditions of approval are listed below:
6. A coordinated sign plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by
the Community Development Director that meets the following guidelines:
A. Each lease area shall receive credit for .5 square feet of signage
per building frontage foot of length for their space with a minimum
of 25 square feet.
B. All signs shall be located facing toward the interior parking lot.
(No sign on front, back, west or east side of the building.)
C. One sign per business or leasehold.
D. Maximum sign letter height shall be 24 inches.
E. All signs shall be individually lighted letters with no exposed
raceways.
The attached sire plan shows the tenant spaces, the sign area allowed (A) and
sign area proposed, (P) according to the Conditions of Approval. Tire Plus is
allowed 40 square feet and propose 82 square feet. They also want their sign
in the front of the building which is not allowed according to Conditions of
Approval. Kennedy Transmission is allowed 26.5 square feet and are
proposing 70 square feet, Croix Valley Glass is proposing 12.5 square feet, 25
square feet allowed. Car Care is allowed 25 square feet and as of yet, have
not proposed a sign. ABRA is proposing 56 square feet and allowed 42.5 square
feet, Big Wheel Rossi has proposed 48 square feet and are allowed 30 square
feet.
Beside the larger signs, some of the tenants; Tire Plus, Kennedy, ABRA, Croix
Valley proposed cabinet type signs or proposed exposed raceway. (The River
Heights Plaza signage is what is required - individual letters with no exposed
raceway).
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
1
As was mentioned above, Tires Plus is also asking for a sign on the south or
front of the building as well as the east.
The Sign Ordinance without the reduced Conditions of Approval for the second
sign on the 1Ox10 foot free standing sign allows one square foot of signage
per frontage face of building.
RECOMMENDATION:
Consideration of request.
ATTACHMENT:
Proposed signs.
r
2
rci,,,,L—
y Date:
Fee: $25.00
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION -
CITY OF STILLWATER
Community Development Department
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Section 31.01, Zoning, Subd. 27 Sign Regulations
Applicant's Name:
Applicant's Address: 7M Telephone Numbe V,2�e. f,410
A licant's Signature:
Owner's Name: e er2��/�,/lye GG
`6wner's Address: tD 2/ %3:-`f 40C Telephone Number:(�%�
T
Contractor's Name: '� Telephone Number:
Street Location of Property: -<� Ws
Legal Description of Property (Lot, Block and Addition): Gf�y Kin, d �^' A
112, JZM : V 0 /3 & 10*11-eG 1,ovlo4imnrle-i�
Sign Plans: Attach plans showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is
to be mounted on a building, show an elevation of the building and sign.
Conditions of Permit Approval:
Approved:
Denied:
Community Development Director Date
.J
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No. SUP/95-52
Planning Commission Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 900 North Owens Street
Zoning District: RA, Single Family Residential District
Applicant's Name: Independent School District 834
Type of Application:. Special Use Permit
Project Description
Special use permit for construction of a 12' x 20', 240 square foot storage shed.
iscussion
The request is to locate a storage shed on the Stonebridge Elementary School site.
The school is a special use in the RA Single Family Residential District. As shown on
the plan, the shed would be located next to the east parking lot. The design and
construction materials of the shed is not included.
Recommendation
Approval with conditions.
Conditions of Approval
1. The design of the storage structure shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director.
Attachment
Site location plan.
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
_ Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Case No.
�'Y- ��
Date: P3 S
Fee Paid: W47V
FEE
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee=
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EA W
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
.-the applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
ith any application.
Address of Project 'Fdo A/a o/ O w cK.J Assessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District Description of Project ;jA7 ;•x,. .414
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used."
Property Owner evr l ezy Representative lain �o�ys.H
Mailing Address /gUr so dMailing Address gry N O N cM., S",
SX•//W.le, Mom/ SSo�.t S/:/�wafc• /hyY s 3"o d.i
Telephone No. 3S1 /2 Telephone No. 3 - - -P7O!
Signature�2 l� Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the eKte of the action.
src•�+
Lot Size (dimensions) x sq. ft..
Total Land Area 12 fe rej
Hight of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Date of Public Hearing is
Total Floor Area a 17Z sq. ft.
Proposed floor area Jyo sq. ft.
Building Coverage sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces /"
10N,
/CwnolH
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No. SUP/95-53
Planning Commission Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 1202 West Myrtle Street
Zoning District: RA - Single family Residential
Applicant's Name: Lauren Fouks
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
Project Description
A special use permit to conduct a massage therapy business out of
a residential home at 1202 West Myrtle Street.
Discussion
The request to conduct a massage therapy business out of
applicants home. The business would be on a part time basis, the
applicant will be going to the clients home and at golf
tournaments and special events at the local health club. There
are on -site parking spaces, typically there would be one customer
there at a time.
Conditions of Approval
1. No exterior signage is allowed.
2. All cars shall park on -site.
3. No additional employees.
4. The use permit shall be reviewed by the planning commission
upon complaint.
Recommendation
Approval as conditioned.
Findings
The granting of this variance will not be injurious to the
neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Attachment
Application package.
June 23, 1995
Planning Commission
City Council
Regarding: Request For A Special Use Permit Required For Business Operations Of
Massage Therapy Out Of My Home.
I, Lauren Fouks, a professional business person presently residing at 1202 W. Myrtle
Street would like a request for a Special Use Permit to operate my newly formed
Massage Therapy Business out of my residence. As stated I presently live in the lower
walk -out unit of my tri-plea at the above said address. Over the last two years I have
been improving my home and lot for my anticipated business use. In August of 1994 I
had Brochman Blacktopping pave a circular outlet driveway with two additional off-
street parking places. A total of 8 off-street parking places including two car garage are
available for convenience and safety reasons. In June of this year I had J.G. Hause
Construction re -roof my home. Hopefully I will be able to complete further planned
improvements of painting the exterior and finishing the landscaping started by
Abrahamson's in April of 1994. Since I am the owner/landlord and a respected business
professional in Stillwater I feel the community and my neighbors will be enthused to
support my professional Massage Therapy Business. My neighborhood is residential
with a mix of duplexes and another tri-plea. I take great pride in my home and believe
that my neighbors would appreciate the fact that I am an on -site owner/landlord who will
tend to regular maintenance and require peace and tranquility in my home and business
operations.
Presently I am enrolled at the Minneapolis School of Massage & Bodywork in
Minneapolis and will be Certified on July 11, 1995 as a Massage Therapist. I have taken
the necessary steps with the State of Minnesota regarding:
Business I.D.Number: 41-1807686
Application For Business Registration
Sales and Use Tax Registration
S Corporation Formation: Wizard of Massage, Inc.
I am requesting a Special Use Permit to do Massage Therapy occasionally for my clients
out of my home. However, as a service to my clients I will be doing massages at my
clients homes (Portable Massage Table) and setting up my Seat -A -Chair (Portable) at
+. ` golf tournaments and special events at our local health club..
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding my new business
venture.
4'"
,y'r.�,'•Y,T.�. 'I;n1 iin;;'
h'u 1Ul wu u'w u luuu uw lwui u� ww l+u ww uw uu' Yuu Uuu1#hhuhbl f
' of � Y � i n o�.r��� ..
. . . . . . . . . .n�
SECRETARY OF STATE
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
I, Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State of
Minnesota, do certify that: Articles of Incorporation,
duly signed and acknowledged under oath, have been filed on
this date in the Office of the Secretary of State, for the
incorporation of the following corporation, under and in
accordance with the provisions of -the chapter of Minnesota
Statutes listed below.
This corporation is now legally organized under the
laws of Minnesota.
Corporate Name: Wizard of Massage, Inc.
Corporate Charter Number: 85-502
Chapter Formed Under: 302A
This certificate has been issued on 05/30/1995.
Secretary of State.
EXHIBIT A
{ •fir.:,
��• A11 that part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1I6
of Section 29 in Township 30 North, of Range 20 West of
�!<<'. �' tV • o .the Fourth Meridian, described as follows: �
Beginning at a .point 60 feet North of the Northeast
corner of Lot 1 in Block 1 of Sinclair's Addition to the t
—~ City of Stillwater, according to the plat thereof on file ,� r
and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of I
Washington County, Minnesota: thence West along the North+N.
line of Myrtle Street in said addition 150 feet to a
point; thence North on a line parallel with the West line ^� r•. �-,
of Center Street in said addition, extended North, 100
feet to a point; thence East on a line parallel with the
North line of said Myrtle Street 150 feet to a point;
thence South a long the West line of said Center Street, `
} extended North, to the plat of beginning.UK
3.�` ',,r'_'.�y,F �a'a".�-1—�...+� + _l.._... � �'•
CD
c ur .p .v`+ •N a�. oo v m; _ 1 N �j,.
-1 CS
•°._. 'SUNSET DR
CD
u oP.o > > a jar ss ino.r jod:r3 �..
ISO
W
fro
�N.I � tseq
1.4�, it• '� � � � �'—.• l� :ll 4 of � r � �.•
Cz
v ry , rse y z . t.. j:.,r ,, " �, o•
,..eALLS� S 0 ��
. --` ,
1. t�� le• •• Y
' • • .r• N,: •., In 1° Y
W s wt•/�N s. N N Itl. s <.
it
- N '' „ CONDOMINIUM NO.- 43
C M� STERLING WAY ?
0 '1 ' wki t+ldG. S D1Ati A v
�� m ` m
0 Jt
01
y 1
�+ •(w'�t•rb fJ •"' ft .., ' �.: ,. .. d�'�1R�ro' ..._ �.dl $rs �>tl�
i � 1. +' � � "."-.ate...,.-.•......,,.��-....�.. 4
il��b 7'>K{�\ i�+rP.�,'t,(�° Fti f'E3 1 r x{ r a� P•,s '"'.-�..+.-�,� �....._..__ ._ .. \�
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM
Case No. 5
Date:
Fee Paid:
ACTION REQUESTED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Appeal
CITY OF STILLWATER
Certificate of Compliance
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
Conditional or
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
Variance
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATI01\
;Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
_ No Special Environmental Assessment Required
FEE
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
any application.
Address of ProjectAlr1le ss ssor'
Zoning pistrict C Desai:ption of Ikoject
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is gran d and used."
Property Owner Representative
MailiaQ Address/ /�/-2,2 61_ YRY Mailing Address
Tele
Sigrl
Any
No.
Telephone No.
Signature
ision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the acti
Lot Size (dimensions)�D x L sq. ft.
Total Land Area / 7;p 1^ -
Hight of Buildings: t Feet
Principal ��
Accessory
of Public Hearing is
Total Floor Area /�U-
Proposed floor arcs �
Building Coverage
Paved Impervious Area
Number of off street pa
x
xx
sq. ft.
sq.
sq.
Usq. ft
g paces ly
A
xx
0
4
VA
lb
m
t ,r40` ' ++ ` ' `ry�e f� `7 �., • �
,�a �, f '!� r' t .. �J 44
r,�v Jt.+i 4 �., �1i t = i. ,r. • �3t , >/
"''rl4�
of
� Lr. lip ♦ "S lrl i, %-.
• r
r y�
/ / � � � its �w�k;/���'',, ,t .�•q ��}k�,� � �i t •�
� Im ' t
wftmw
o a«
3
tfxora flet
te,
^a; t
�f l4
] 1
;t
i
i
• ' i 'i
-„ 1
II > s+
.C;
►'GQO /ti
►P4
�~
O
�E•22
a
00
a,
..
Q,j
n a c
00
U y O
c
y
c.
c.
N
O
y c� •_
m 3 n•'�o
a�
u � `� N •t7 L
O O
CZ
E cj
30 C C1
T7 p 1
On
C N
- cis
o
0
-0c
E x � " = �
o—
�
O
o
u
ac, o° o v
O N
3
V
o
v,
u G c n o0ia
0
0
ui
M
e-1
O
O to
O O
Ill H
N O to
w o to
z x
H n a
4 w
to
a o
x
o z z
x o 0
N W W
x x
.-t E•4 H
'�1 H
co
H p
►,� x cn to
En ►'D H N tf1
Enwwr4 a�
o���
►�' z
[may aaAWN HH
:3: H NO H
a C
U
CV
..
a�
ul V Q
WwN
0,0
aco
�o,v
o
E
El)W
H o
:s Di
>' in
_=
L!
�i►X.fir'N
wLO
4 a ono
c H
U) i 3 E'H N
t11
n' E v
O ouoc-�
C H •� N
.O
"=j
cn0 N
;
W
a
o a8
E h
o H C3 3 v
y o
•ern
x
-d
a
o �•__ H o
i
0 tnv
�o55E
oQ.2
Az N
EH.E4
uA
or- ra
O
C 4 N co O
O
►� G4
N H
c a.�
N(A
vu°E
U
�a�c
Vi y C
N O
.0 U vVi
W.
..
u
...
� .. •
..,ems �,
� Y•
•
~ •
`• r
E+O
H
•�•�`.(
a H
aw
�•
U z�
.
Hw
or
.
�•�•
* 49 * *
WIZARD OF MASSAGE
LAUREN A. FOUKS
CERTIFIED MASSAGE THERAPIST
(612)439-1222
1202 WEST MYRTLE STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
*CODE OF ETHICS*
THE BASIS FOR TRUE PROFESSIONALISM LIES IN INTEGRITY. I
WILL BE ETHICAL, HONEST AND SINCERE, AND PROVIDE
CONFIDENTIALITY FOR ALL OF MY CLIENTS.
1. I WILL KEEP ALL OF MY AGREEMENTS MADE WITH MY
CLIENT.
2. I WILL BE TRUE TO MY PRINCIPLES OF BEING
UNCONDITIONALLY COMMITTED TO HELP YOU
WITH YOUR CHOICES AND GUIDE YOU ON YOUR
PATH TO A LESS STRESSFUL LIFE.
3.• I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO NOT TREAT ANYONE
WHOM I AM NOT ADEQUATELY TRAINED TO
PROVIDE FOR.
4. I WILL BE TRUE TO MYSELF IN OBTAINING MY
PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY.
PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY
NOTHING WORTH ACHIEVING COMES EASY. SUCCESS HAS TO HAVE
HARD WORK AS A MAIN INGREDIENT..... -I LIKE TO WORK HARD, MAKE
MONEY AND HAVE FUN WHILE DOING IT.
I PLEDGE TO YOU, MY CLIENT, MY HONESTY, HARD WORK AND
HOPEFULLY SOME FUN ALONG THE WAY. I WILL ACHIEVE MY
PROFESSIONAL GOAL ONLY BY HELPING YOU FIND YOUR PATH TO A
LESS STRESSFUL LIFE THROUGH MASSAGE THERAPY
LEVELS OF-':NIErV1BERSH�p
T = • • • �p
0m
A � � m m
u m
cFu m 3
v � a+mruv�i
N
'Z•i Dl •D N
Nf A n (C
m
ID t a n J
c N
3 m rt± nUJ
Q bID
<'
m :u
ll' m
f3.�
0 .�
i
a
eel
Lo
.s
00
r
00
OO
'p •a
:D
w m
92,
o H 0-
ap,
�p1 e
'n
fu
m,
.•s m
y �•
V ?
a ynawN - A • •
N3
3
��3 Aaa m to
Z 9 m m
dad � m Q• "
a 0 a•
n
a is n N
Q
°h
�.a
(NU N
fiaa
CML
3 g a
_ a c�
�3 SO
og
Sa Z
0 {
,-..
A
N
A
0
N
m
h
0 K
a
.<
0! 1 fp ti -.H �-n obi,• b�' .�
�
fD�
cL
rn
�• �D :.: :
1 01 O .-t• •a„tom) • V'�
.N „
o
0
`
?�'`'D
N�
J
Ir
cx
10
"a
O f
1►�
�
� � � Y� try � r-•rAr:
.1 .'
` <. •-� a
(- SQi 0 '� mr
zi
eo
� •
O
c
•/ N
��
�y aN�
x N C
m� o,
e+i •Y ,� N
O
N
7 N l �
•ONi a
m N
3—
x m c
no w
v
K
m m ^ O
S
7to
N
CD
C
C7
" m 0 d
�
a ;
°
A X,7
O
0 m
J
Q
0m PO�
to
<
ro
0
m-
o r=
N
o
o^IA
Dv^ �D,,,
03w -�
-Q3DD
"t
o D
o ti►z
Q
m N 7 � �.O 7 m rp
7 O•..:
°i
fD ro o,
c3
R
° m<S
$cn
3 °5! 3 O
a
J`''•
fi n J a 0' to o
< YE
0' 7 y p
0ID
m
s i
Q
a C}
um cc
DJ 0,� �o
�.
w 0� O
3 to a m
to
a
NFy
wto m N N l0
� '
a
.
D ip °—' D fD a m
��
Lt
N
J
n•i• n D '_ 3C
N N
N W
3 o
m �3
c jgDa'4.:
4 r^D ('U
m
0 o. D '� 2
�- lm0 CU - N <
-
m I r. n O m
O "
m n
o � m 01
0 C J
ti N
J
COMPETITION
•
* .SISTER GE ULTNJSSG ��
*KIM MARIE�S i
r
TOUCH
* 'SUSAN KATHERYN SMITH
•
* LYNETTE NEWMAN-GENTLE TOUCH m {
'� t 1 G�
r 431- O� ��
0
NO
.4:
' Af�
cn"
rj) 3
r o CD
(A o' o 7 (.0r
0 CA
�;o
CD fi.
".0. (1) (A Put" "M-
C>`
on 0
..0 CD (D
CD e o
V
CD. 0. (1) 0 Q 0'. cn
(n •(D� CD
�j
A) CD
c)
0
En
Cn
0 (D
�31 CD rj)
Cv.
En Cr
V..
0: (D' CD 0.1
0. (n ":3.
la
CD
En
(A
r
Srermain e'Perreaul
herapeuticimassago 'T
',A 34740dttage� riv
{Stillwater M N: 55082f,
31
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No. V/95-43
Planning Commission Date: July 10, 1995
Project Location: 212 Sixth Street So.
Zoning District: RB - Two Family Residential
Applicant's Name: Brent and Wendy Johnson
Type of Application: Varience to the side yard setback to
expand an existing garage
Project Description
A variance to the side yard setback (14 ft requested, 30 ft.
required) to expand an existing garage at 212 Sixth Street South.
Discussion
The applicant orginally requested a varience to the side yard
setback (14 ft requested, 30 ft required) to expand an existing
garage at 212 Sixth Street South. The request was continued from
the June 12th meeting and the applicant and architect took
another look at what they might do. They were able to take two
feet off the proposed addition and create more room for cars to
park outside the garage.
Attachments
Orginal sketches 5-25-95
Revised
shetches dated 6-28-95
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
Case No. V/95-43
Planning Commission Date: June 12, 1995
Project Location: 212 Sixth Street South
Zoning District: RB, Two Family Residential
Applicant's Name: Brent and Wendy Johnson
Type of Application: Variance to the sideyard setback to expand an existing garage
Project Description
The applicant is requesting a variance to the side yard setback (14 ft. requested, 30 ft. required)
to expand an existing garage at 212 Sixth Street South. The proposed addition would increase
the existing floor area from 480 sq. ft. to 740 sq. ft. - to increase the first floor and add a upstairs
level for storage. See attachment.
Discussion
-� The garage is behind the house in an alley and is parallel with the back property line. Although
the proposed addition would not obstruct traffic or be detrimental to the adjoining properties and
the additions exterior finish and roof line will be consistent and in character with the existing
house the proposal does not meet zoning requirements and unique site conditions have not been
presented .
Findinizs
The request is not consistent with the zoning ordinance.
Recommendation
4
Denial
10 ��
PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE F0F.M
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Case No.
Date:
Fee Paid:
ACTION REQUESTED FEE
Appeal
Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Permit
Design Review Permit
Planned Unit Development
X Variance(Mm6e Se- w)
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning Amendment
Other
Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
`*t applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection
..,Lh any application.
Address of Project '1K (OT" ST. So
Zoning District Description of Project,
Parcel No.
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used."
,N w.d``�� �"
Property Owner 6V_:w �o�Sovt Representative Ttrtn Sit 'e-Ea�,tfwsOf� C.
Mailing Address 4.k2 (og— S+. Mailing Address
Sbflw4w Kia eF170%a yt-ijiw rttJ 5�h2
Telephone No. Telephone No. blZ .9'30.ODS
Signature Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action.
Lot Size (dimensions) IC; x 124'
Total Land Area
Night of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory (�2 (6 ^6" r'Ntp PptNT
ap &AW G)
Date of Public Hearing is
sq. ft.
Total Floor Area 'tE sq. ft.
Proposed floor area 1t0 sq. ft.
Building Coverage sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area 124 sq. ft. f/_
Number of off street parking spaces t
APPLICATION
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
For each box
checked elow a handout describing the
application submittal
requirements
for that planning permit is attached. Make sure complete information is
provided with
the application.
1.
1 1
Appeals
2.
F___j
Building Moving Permit
3.
F-1
Certificate of Compliance
4.
�-j
Conditional or Special Use Permit
5.
General Bluffland/Shoreland/Floodplain
6.
(__j
Design Permit
7.
j
Grading Permit
8.
f j
Planned Unit Development
-
9.
On -site Sewer Permit
.-� 10.
j^(
Site Alteration Permit
11.
Variance
12.
Vegetative Cutting Permit
13.
(__(
Zoning Amendment
14.
F1
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
15.
( ;
Other
4
RECORD OF ACTION ON APPLICATION
Decision Authority
Date of Action
Decision by Authority
Appeals Period
(Date)
Appeal Filed
(Date)
Appeal Scheduled
(Date
Appeal Decision Authority
Appeal Decision Approved
Denial (Date)
_ Decision.°Complete
- - ate-)
Community Development Director
May 25, 1995
Planning Commission
Stillwater, Minnesota
Dear members of the Stillwater Planning Commission;
We are applying for a variance to expand our existing garage
for storage purposes all of which represent a hardship for
our growing family.
* We have very limited space in our 110 year old
home. We have.no attic storage space and a very
small, rustic cellar and -as with all historic
homes, very small closets. Storing seasonal clothes -
and -accessories has always been very challenging.
* We are expecting our second child in December and
though we have three bedrooms, we will convert the
third bedroom from a storage room/guest bedroom to
a nursery. This reason alone necessitates more space
and storage.
* We currently have'a two stall garage with limited
extra space for bicycles, lawn mower, recycling,
garden table and garden tools not to mention extra
boxes of storage...-Chi-10 n-_s toy storage is needed also.
* We are proposing a four stall garage to avoid parking
on the dirveway full time and to gain additional
storage for the above listed.
* We are a very close neighborhood and we all really
look out for eachother. We are confident that our
neighbors will support and appreciate our interest
in creating an historic carriage house to compliment
one of Stillwaters' earliest residences. By granting
this varience, our family can continue to live in a
neighborhood that we have valued for eight years.
Thank you for your consideration !
Sincerely,
/10��' C1it��fJ� v
Wendy and Brent Johnson
212 South Sixth Street
Stillwater
Le -3D - `--;
'N
�6,3%6�ya-�
V Atio Ttg&WSRN68
ADDI TfoN
0 , (
BRH'[1t3'V &hMEC
\
N
AoOlitoN
N SIX",
,.
'✓
��H� «��
�\
AS1' *.'T
AvoD�Ttiot� 'e
TF60
/
l `� ��
toy Zo reww6
?.•}
tteuse
NOTMOT
S!DSWM,�
y
f�oT Pt�tNT
m
m
=fib
o r
N
E+Lls'�i(Jb G
exwmad Abe
Ze' x 1,1V
U 3o - 9S
Z2!--ou
To Pg*f�-TTT LING
AvDi-noN To
gonirwN h�
bN.vewr"{ J
Y
1/
6ImwIri.1c
(1-M `IT.
r,. 410 N%.WGIKMS
T
I k-N
cr
—:3r
'"-
ttLo M
(o-Cl} sT
J oHW�oa 4�D Alt e 1* sT s.
�. 4.6 �5 _STg��J -_l,Ba�so N Rssoc�ri�S
Lot ou