The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-05-16 HPC Packet AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North May 16th, 2018 * NATIONAL PRESERVATION MONTH * REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ELECTION OF OFFICERS III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of April 18th , 2018 regular meeting minutes V. ELECTION OF OFFICERS VI. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. VII. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Case No. 2018-13: Consideration of a Design Permit to install a wall and a projecting sign for Pearl and the Thief on, the structure located at 112 Main Street North located in the CBD district. Jose Val Leon of Leon Properties, LLC, property owner and applicant representing Joseph Pirri, of Pearl and the Thief. VIII. PUBLIC HEARING 3. Case No. 2018-10: Consideration of a Design Permit to demolish accessory structure on the property located at 914 2nd Street South in the RB District. Steven and Stephanie Schifsky, property owners. IX. NEW BUISNESS 4. Case No. 2018-11: Consideration of a Design Permit for a self-serve bicycle rental kiosk, an outdoor Commercial Recreational Business, on an undeveloped portion of the parking lot associated with 101 Water Street South, the Water Street Inn in the CBD district. Chuck Dougherty, property owner and Darren Dobier of Diro Outdoors, applicant. 5. Case No. 2018-12: Consideration of an amendment to Design Permit 2016-27 for the Crosby Hotel to be located at 232 Main Street South in the Downtown Design Review District. Anne Loff, property owner and Matt Hoefler, applicant. X. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION XI. STAFF UPDATES/FYI 6. Comprehensive Plan Historic Resources Chapter Update –No Packet Materials XII. ADJOURNMENT HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING April 18, 2018 7:00 P.M. Chairman Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Commissioners Hadrits, Krakowski, Mino, Steinwall, Chairman Larson, Council Representative Junker Absent: Commissioners Goodman and Welty Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of March 21, 2018 meeting minutes Motion by Commissioner Hadrits, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve the minutes of the March 21, 2018 meeting. Motion passed 4-0 with Commissioner Steinwall abstaining. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2018-07: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for new business signage for the property located at 214 Main Street South in the CBD District. Mike Lynskey, property owner and Kathy Lipps, applicant. Case No. 2018-09: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for window replacement for the property located at 101 Third Street South in the CBD District. Edward Schmidt, applicant. Chairman Larson requested that Case No. 2018-07 and Case No. 2018-09 be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Case No. 2018-07: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for new business signage for the property located at 214 Main Street South in the CBD District. Mike Lynskey, property owner and Kathy Lipps, applicant. Chairman Larson asked for clarification on the brackets to be used. City Planner Wittman said she assumed the design detail provided is a rendering of existing brackets. Chairman Larson said he has no issues if new brackets are used, since there is no existing sign package for the entire building. He suggested adding a condition of approval stating, if the bracket is replaced, that it be black metal similar to existing brackets. Motion by Chairman Larsen, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve Case No. 2018-07, Design Review Permit for new business signage for the property located at 214 Main Street South with the five conditions recommended by staff, adding Condition F stating that if the brackets are replaced, they shall be black metal in a similar style as the existing brackets. All in favor, 5-0. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting April 18, 2018 Page 2 of 3 Case No. 2018-09: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for window replacement for the property located at 101 Third Street South in the CBD District. Edward Schmidt, applicant. City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting a Design Permit to replace all windows on the structure with vinyl wrapped, wood Anderson 200 series windows in a sand finish to match the existing, upper story horizontal vinyl siding. The proposal includes a slight modification of the existing, lower level windows, as the 5’ wide by 6’ tall window opening is too large for a double hung window to operate efficiently. Therefore, the applicant is proposing the replacement of the single, double hung window with two, double hung windows separated by a grille. With the exception of the smallest openings, all first story openings on the north and east façades will be approximately 6’ tall. The openings, when finished, will have solider coursing and exterior mulleins in a five over five pattern, as exists today. The upper story windows, where possible, will be replaced 1:1 with the same level of detail and trim as the lower level windows. Exterior mulleins will be reduced to between four over four, down to two over two, depending on the overall window size. Staff recommends approval with five conditions. Edward Schmidt and Tim Brown, applicants, stated that they plan to replace the original windows, adding grilles on the top half. The bottom will be open so it looks more original. The openings won’t change. Chairman Larson questioned whether the muntins or grilles will fit the historic character of the building. He would prefer grilles to be located on the exterior of the panes if possible, as opposed to them being between the panes of glass. Mr. Brown said they could have the muntins on the exterior if requested. Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve Case No. 2018-09, Design Review Permit for window replacement for the property located at 101 Third Street South, with the five conditions recommended by staff, amending Condition D to state that the windows shall have exterior grilles in a similar pattern as, or as close as possible to, the existing divided pattern. Motion passed 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING Case No. 2018-08: Consideration of a Design Review Permit to build a new single family home with an attached two car garage located at 107 Everett Street South in the RB District. Mark and Karen Petersen. City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting a permit to construct a two and a half story, single-family residence at 107 Everett Street South, a vacant lot in the Neighborhood Conservation District. The house will have a single, front facing, asymmetrical 12/12 pitch, gable roof on both the house and its attached recessed garage. The house will be sided with a combination of dark gray, cement fiber, board and batten and lap siding in cedar or IPE natural wood. This will be carried on all four sides of the home. The roof areas will have composite shingles with metal accents over porches, walkways and protruding additions. Windows will be a gunmetal gray. The house will have an open, covered front stoop and porch with a rear yard screened porch. It appears that there will be little exposed foundation but what is exposed to proposed to remain as poured concrete walls. Staff finds that while this modern design would not fit within most traditional neighborhoods in Stillwater, it does not detract from the character of this dead-end street. With certain conditions, the project substantially conforms to the adopted guidelines and, therefore, staff recommends approval with seven conditions. Applicant Mark Petersen said he plans to raise the driveway about four feet but there won’t be much grade change on the south side of the house. Chairman Larson opened the public hearing. There were no comments. The public hearing was closed. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting April 18, 2018 Page 3 of 3 Commissioner Hadrits questioned whether the garage door design fits the home design. Mr. Petersen said he tried to make the garage look detached even though it is attached, to reduce the appearance of the massing. Chairman Larson said he appreciates how the scale and massing of the house fits the neighborhood and conforms to the Conservation District Guidelines. Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve Case No. 2018-08, Design Review Permit to build a new single family home with an attached two car garage located at 107 Everett Street South, with the seven conditions recommended by staff. All in favor, 5-0. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION National Preservation Month and Preservation Awards (May) Ms. Wittman led discussion of potential candidates for the annual preservation awards. Commissioners agreed with Ms. Wittman’s suggestions. Awards will be presented at the May 17 City Council meeting. STAFF UPDATES There were no staff updates. ADJOURNMENT TO JOINT HPC AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Motion by Chairman Larson, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to adjourn to the Joint HPC and Advisory Committee Meeting. All in favor, 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:47 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink, Recording Secretary HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 16, 2018 CASE NO.: 2018-13 APPLICANT: Jose Val Leon, property owner, representing Joseph Pirri of The Pearl and the Thief REQUEST: Request for a Design Permit to install a wall and a projecting sign for Pearl and the Thief on, the structure located at 112 Main Street North ZONING: Central Business COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of the following improvements to the structure located at 112 Main Street North, a contributing building in the Downtown Commercial Historic District:  The installation of one, 17” tall by 14’ long painted wood sign with 3/8” thick, black acrylic, pin-mounted letters that will read “The Pearl and the Thief”, the business name. Though the wall sign is proposed to have two of the business’s logos on each side of the pin-mounted letters, the applicant has indicated they are favorable to removing those letters. The sign’s backboard will be painted gold. Figure 1: Street View (via Google Maps - dated October, 2017) Case No. 2018-06 HPC: March 20, 2018 Page 2 of 3  The installation of one, 20” tall by 18” wide projecting metal sign to be hung from an existing bracket, underneath existing exterior lights. The sign will contain a black, 3/8” thick pin-mounted business logo on it.  The installation of a new wood and glass door to be painted gold. Though the applicant’s submission includes a door that has dividers, the desired door will not include this feature. APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS One hanging sign, no greater than six square feet, is permitted per business in the CBD. The sign ordinance further indicates projecting signs must be visible from the sidewalk and not be a hazard to pedestrians. If lighted, the sign must be externally lit. The sign conforms to these standards as well as the Downtown Design Review District guidelines. The Downtown Design Review Manual indicates:  Materials: Modern sign materials are acceptable provided their design is handled with an understanding of the Victorian spirit.  Color: Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. The relationship of the colors and tones used on new or improved structures must be compatible with the color and tone patterns already established by adjacent buildings. The tasteful use of color and accent can introduce variety and charm, whereas the indiscriminate use of colors and color combinations can overload the senses and produce visual conflict and chaos. The goal is to achieve an area-wide complementary blend of background colors combined with selected and limited uses of primary and focal colors. • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect. • Avoid colors which visually overpower or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established downtown color schemes as a whole. ALTERNATIVES Figure 2: via Google Maps - dated October, 2017 Figure 3: Proposed Door (No Dividers) Case No. 2018-06 HPC: March 20, 2018 Page 3 of 3 A. Approve, whole or in part. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District standards, and the standards set forth for Design Permits, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2018-13. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and on file with HPC Case No. 2018-13. 2. The wall mounted sign shall not contain the business logos. 3. The projecting sign shall be made of painted wood or metal. Vinyl cut lettering shall not be permitted. The sign shall hang a minimum of eight feet off of the public sidewalk area. 4. Each sign shall obtain a sign permit prior to the installation of the sign. 5. Disturbance to the exterior wall face shall be done in a fashion as to prevent excess damage. Any existing drill holes not utilized will be patched prior to painting. 6. Prior to painting the structure, the applicant or representative shall obtain a contractor’s license as well as any required and necessary obstruction permits. 7. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Downtown Design Review District standards, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request may be tabled to the following hearing. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The applicant’s projecting sign conform to the Zoning Code and Downtown Design Review District guidelines. On the basis HPC Case No. 2018-06 conforms to the Downtown Design Review District standards, staff recommends conditional approval of the wall and projecting signs to be installed at 112 Main Street North. ATTACHMENTS Applicant submission (1 page) HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 16, 2018 CASE NO.: 2018-10 APPLICANT: Steve and Stephanie Schifsky, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of the demolition of the accessory structure located at 914 2nd Street South ZONING: RB – Two Family COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR – Low/Medium Density PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of the demolition of an (approximately) 200 square foot accessory structure located at 914 2nd Street South, historically known as the Lindsley C. Everitt house and constructed in 1876. The property owner would like to demolish the 11’ wide by 20’ deep structure and reconstruct a functioning two-car, detached garage with an attached workshop. PROPERTY HISTORY AND CONDITION Washington County Recorder office records indicate the last sale of the property occurred in 2008. The 2003 City of Stillwater Architecture-History Inventory Form does not note the accessory structure but the building appears on the October, 1888 Sanborn Maps. No building permits are on file for the accessory structure. The use is not identified in any accessible city documents. The interior of the structure dimensional lumber and a dirt floor; the building was constructed on grade as there is no foundation and minimal evidence of anything greater than a single wooden support on the lowest portion of the building. While there is a cross beam in the structure, suggesting the structure had a second story or loft, the beam is at a height of approximately 5’. Therefore, the structure could not serve as modern vehicle storage unless it was placed on numerous courses of block. 914 2nd Street South Case 2018-10 HPC: 5/16/2018 The structure is in poor condition, having evidence of deferred maintenance: missing or fallen shingles, peeling, and cracking or missing paint on wood lap siding. At some point an animal access point was made on the western side of the structure. Because of inadequate framing, the western wall is significantly is compromised. This wall is situated almost directly on the property line. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION Comprehensive Plan Chapter Five, Historic Resources, indicates a program that “[t]he city shall locally designate those properties worthy of historic preservation”. Additionally, the Comp Plan indicates (referring to the Demolition Ordinance) “this ordinance promotes the protection of the city’s historic and aesthetic qualities”. As per Chapter 34 of the municipal code, staff had determined the structure as potentially a historic resource as it: a) is associated with a period of Stillwater’s history that exemplifies broad patterns of cultural and social history; and • This home was constructed during the following Historic Context(s): i. Stillwater and St. Croix Triangle Lumbering (1843- 1914) ii. Stillwater Town Planning and Development (1844-1945) iii. Development of Residential Neighborhoods (1850s – 1940s) o The 1996 Architecture-History Inventory Form lists the primary structure as eligible for local listing under this period of significance. b) contains distinctive elements of city and neighborhood identity; and c) embodies the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style. SITE VISIT AND ASSESSMENT In addition to viewing the property, historical and 180 degree aerial imagery, and submitted photographs, planning staff reviewed the neighboring surroundings in relationship to historic surveys, context assessments and designation studies previously conducted by the HPC. There are no known inventories or records of this accessory structure. 914 2nd Street South Case 2018-10 HPC: 5/16/2018 In addition to viewing photographs and historical aerial imagery, Building Official Cindy Shilts and I conducted a site visit upon request of the property owner. Based on the exterior assessment, the structure is a private property hazard, in a state of disrepair, and should be removed. An order for removal has not been made given the application was submitted, and accepted, by the City Planning Department. PUBLIC COMMENT The City has received no public comment. STAFF ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Before approving the demolition of a building, the commission shall make findings that the demolition is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the property, or that there are no reasonable alternatives to the demolition. In determining whether reasonable alternatives exist, the commission shall consider, but not be limited to, the significance of the property, the integrity of the property and the economic value or usefulness of the existing structure, including its current use, costs of renovation and feasible alternative uses. 1. Is the building or structure a historic resource? The code defines a historic resource as: “Any building or structure that is not currently designated as a Heritage Preservation Site but which is worthy of such designation because of its historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological or engineering significance.” While the structure is an example of a pre-1900 barn, the structure’s condition is exceptionally poor given its deferred maintenance that has occurred over time. In its current condition, it would not be eligible for local or National listing. 2. Is there a feasible alternative to demolition? In determining whether reasonable alternatives exist, the commission shall consider, but not be limited to, the significance of the property, the integrity of the property and the economic value or usefulness of the existing structure, including its current use, costs of renovation and feasible alternative uses. Costs for renovation have been explored. However, it has been determined that restoration is not a feasible option given it would require jacking the structure and laying several courses of block as well as constructing a new cross-beam support. It cannot be determined that, in its present condition, the structure would survive the modifications. Furthermore, the structure’s size might not accommodate a modern vehicle (with average vehicle lengths being approximately 18’ in length). The structure is not suitable for modern reuse and necessary modifications to make it a functioning garage would not only destroy an architectural character, they could also risk the structural integrity of the building. Therefore, staff finds there are no feasible alternatives to demolition. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION 914 2nd Street South Case 2018-10 HPC: 5/16/2018 Staff recommends the HPC open the public hearing to take public comment, including testimony from the applicant. Once all comments have been made, the HPC should close the public hearing and take action on the request. The Commissions must make one of the findings: 1. If the Commission finds that the property is not a historic resource (i.e. makes “negative findings”) or that the property is historically significant or a historic resource, but that there is no feasible alternative to demolition (i.e. makes “positive finding with no feasible alternative to demolition”), then the commission shall notify the building official that a demolition permit may be issued. In both of these circumstances, the commission may require a mitigation plan as a condition of any approval for demolition of a building. Such plan may include the documentation of the property by measured drawings, photographic recording, historical research or other means appropriate to the significance of the property. 2. If the commission finds that the property is historically significant or a historic resource, and that there is a feasible alternative to demolition (i.e. makes “positive finding with feasible alternative to demolition”), then the commission shall deny the demolition permit and direct the Community Development Director to prepare a designation study of the property. Staff recommends the Commission make the positive findings that there is not a feasible alternative to demolition and approve the demolition of the accessory structure located at 914 2nd Street South. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Applicant Narrative Existing Structure Photographs (4 pages) Proposed Development – Bird’s Eye View Proposed Garage Plans (4 pages) HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 16th, 2018 CASE NO.: 2018-11 APPLICANT: Darren Dobier, representing Diro Outdoors REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for a self-serve bicycle rental kiosk, an outdoor Commercial Recreational Business, on an undeveloped portion of the parking lot associated with 101 Water Street South, the Water Street Inn ZONING: CBD – Central Business District COMP PLAN: DMU – Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND As part of the exisiting and proposed Water Street Inn expansion projects, a parking lot has been constructed on a portion of the city block located north of the Myrtle Street, east of Water Street, and bordering the City owned trail adjacent to Lowell Park. The parking lot plans originally called for the construction of a trash enclosure to be located at the Southwest corner of the site. However, the approved hotel expansion project includes the future construction of portion of the hotel that will accommodate trash indoors. Therefore, a remaining portion of the parking lot, outside of the curb line, is undeveloped. Figure 1: View of SW corner of Water Street Inn Parking lot, bordering Water Street South and Myrtle Street East (Photo via Google Maps, dated August, 2017) HPC 2018-11 May 15, 2018 Page 2 of 4 REQUEST Darren Dobier operates Diro Outdoors, a local outdoor activities and gear rental business. He is requesting the installation of (up to) 17 bicycles at a self-serve kiosk facility to be located on the undeveloped portion of the Water Street Inn’s parking lot. While this business will be operated seasonally, the infrastructure improvements (including signage and bicycle mounts/locks) would be permanently installed on the site. There would be no onsite management but, rather, users would be able to rent a bicycle from their smartphone. The applicant is requesting consideration of: 1. A (approximately) 23’ wide by 27’ deep, natural and dark gray slab stamped concrete area surrounded by cedar mulched beds on the west and north sides. 2. Two signs: a) One, 16 square foot sign proposed to be inserted into a 4x4” cedar frame that will be charred for weather resistance. The sign, with lettering in Diro Outdoors signature green color, the sign will contain instructions on use, and a map of City of Stillwater, Oak Park Heights, and state trails. b) One small sign, affixed to the sign frame, which will indicate the area is monitored by video surveillance. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Municipal Code Section Sec. 31-509(f), Standards for Review, indicates the HPC shall utilize the following standards:  Site layout: The orientation and location of buildings and open spaces in relation to the physical characteristics of the site, the character of the neighborhood and the appearance and harmony of the buildings with adjacent development.  Architectural character: o The suitability of the building for the intended purpose. o The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines. o The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development.  Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development.  Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources.  Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following (abbreviated) guidelines:  Materials: Compatibility with similar exterior construction materials in the immediate area is recommended in order to maintain the distinct character and harmony of the area.  Signs and Graphics: o Materials: HPC 2018-11 May 15, 2018 Page 3 of 4  Use painted wood where practicable. It is the authentic material and will look appropriate against the weathered brick of Stillwater’s commercial facades. Modern materials that simulate wood may be acceptable, and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. o Color:  Choose subdued colors and dark tones in keeping with the Victorian tradition. Property selected combinations of dark brown and green, black, off-white and gold are appropriate.  Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. o Lettering:  Chose a bold and simple type style and use it on all appropriate signs. ANALYSIS Landscaping The landscaping features will improve this area, currently containing rock. The stamped concrete is designed to have a natural stone and railroad tie look. The combination of grays is consistent with colors found in the downtown core. The use of cedar mulch and landscaping plants is desirable. Signage The sign materials will be a lightweight, closed-cell, free foam, rigid PVC sheet known as Komatex with vinyl on the front. This type of material is not encourage in the Downtown Design Review District though it will have a similar appearance as an interpretative panel. However, due to the nature of the business, the applicant expects the signage will need to be modified on an annual basis. Additionally, the signage does contain more information than the Downtown Design Review District guidelines encourage. This is two-fold. First, this business is fulfilling a need in the community that is often provided by the public sector. As there will not be onsite staff and the business is not related to the Water Street Inn, the applicant is proposing signage that will allow for patrons to use the bicycles in a self-serve fashion. Therefore, the signage serve more of an informational purpose rather than for identification purposes. Secondly, to reduce the amount of signage needed to explain how the business works, the applicant is requesting the company’s website and phone number to encourage users to contact Diro Outdoors directly, in the event users need additional information. ALTERNATIVES A. Approval If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposal to be consistent with the Design Permit regulations, including the application of the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, the Commission could approve the Design Permit with or without the conditions. If the Commission finds the proposal is consistent the applicable regulations and guidelines, staff would recommend the following conditions of approval: HPC 2018-11 May 15, 2018 Page 4 of 4 1. The business sign shall be printed in a matte finish. 2. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Table If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds that the application is not complete enough to make a decision, it could continue the review for additional information. C. Denial If the Heritage Preservation Commission finds the proposal is not consistent with the Design Permit regulations and the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, the Commission could deny the application. The Commission should indicate a reason for the denial and state whether or not the denial is with prejudice. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed design generally conforms to the intent of the Downtown Design Review District guidelines. With certain conditions, the signage can conform to the standards for Design Permits and the Downtown Design Review District guidelines. Therefore, staff would recommend conditional approval of HPC Case No. 2018-11 for a Design Permit for Diro Outdoor’s serve self-bicycle kiosk facility. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Applicant Submission (19 pages) Sign Details IN TE R S TA TE H IG H W A Y B R ID G E E A S T M Y R T L E S T R E E T E A S T C H E S T N U T S T SOUTH THI RD STREETSOUTH SECOND STREETSTATE HWY 95STATE HI GHWAYS 95 & 36C S A H 2 3 SO MAI N STSOUTH WATER STREETA L L E Y C O M M E R C IA L A V E N U ENORTH WATER STREETSO UNI ON STALLEYALLEYC S A H 23BURLI NGTONNORTHERNRAI LROADUNI ON ALLEYN E L S O N A L L E YNORTH WATERSTE O L IV E S T S T A T E H W Y 3 6 N E L S O N S T R E E TSAM BL OOMER WAY350 350350350 350 350 350350 350350 204 333 212 305 200 101 232 425 102 107 324 220 123 208 106 302 124 402 275 214 201 101 242 221 301 114 130 251 110 113 301301 270 204 121 575 114 124 413 102 350 317 108 101101 101 302 103 229 201 218 102 302 204 321 209221 106 114 423 225 132 209 115 225 107 320 223 215 350 233 126 202 301 219 µ 0 310 620155Feet ^ General Site Location Site Location Map 101 Water St S Bringing The Joys & Beneﬁts Of Biking To Downtown Stillwater Darren Dobier 3/28/2018 The Plan: •Provide a self-serve bike rental station with 10 bikes to serve the needs of residents, visitors, and tourists •Location - Water Street Inn •Bikes are checked in and out with a rider’s smartphone •Bikes will be locked to rack within bike station to maintain clean and neat appearance •Bikes will be highly visible, inviting and fun to ride •Available during the spring, summer, and fall seasons from sunrise to sunset •Rental station will be landscaped and maintained by professional landscaping service to ensure it aligns with surrounding landscapes and businesses •Riders will be charged hourly rates Our Customers: Tourists Couples & Friends Families w/Adult Children Downtown Residents With the intentional efforts to make Stillwater a more bike friendly town, our bike rental station will help provide even greater access to this wonderful resource. Whether you’re a tourist in town for a wedding; a couple wanting a romantic afternoon; a family looking for fun and exercise; or a downtown resident who doesn’t want to buy and store a bike, we have you covered. How does it work? Find  Use the app to find the nearest bike station. Unlock  At the station, use the app to unlock your bike. Ride  Rental rates are determined by defined plans and pricing. Return  To end a rental, securely return the bike at the nearest dock. Bikes are found, unlocked, returned, and paid for through a rider’s smartphone phone which allows them to ride when it’s convenient. Administration  We can track which bikes are out, reported issues & much more all remotely It Starts With The Bikes  Fun, quality bikes with the maintenance free features you would want in a bike rental program. Stylish woodgrain background to acknowledge the lumber history of Stillwater Basket to carry lunch, beverages, and downtown purchases. Attached to bike frame to allow carrying of loads without impacting steering. Fenders to keep riders cleaner in damp conditions Bell to alert pedestrians and other bikers Dual kick-stand for stability even with heavy basket items 7-Speed internal shifting Rim brakes for reliable stopping on steeper river valley hills Puncture resistant tires Anti-theft features Solar powered locks  (not shown in mockup) Bright white frame with DIRO green accents for high- visibility and fun. Coordinated with station branding and colors. DIRO Branding Stand (black) dirooutdoors.com • 651-233-6059 Rack Instructions Located on top of each rack Additional Features Available Feature Notes Additional Payment Options Available  (daily, monthly, yearly, special event, …) Once hourly usage is understood additional options could be implemented to cater speciﬁcally to local and downtown residents’ needs Ability to add additional rental stations As demand increases, bike stations can be easily added without required minimums or need for onsite electricity Dock-less bike locking allows you to lock a bike without the need for a physical rental station Not intending to implement: Our bikes can only be locked to rentals station stands which prevents riders from locking bikes all over town and on sidewalks minimizing pedestrian trafﬁc issues Unisex and one-sized bikes Not intending to implement child-sized bikes Since bikes will typically be ridden without helmets, not offering small bikes for kids mitigates risk to young riders Business Discount Programs We are currently working with vendor to implement functionality allowing businesses and local lodging establishments to purchase discount programs for their employees or guests to improve wellness and amenities Rear Basket Design Location We have approval from Chuck Dougherty from the Water Street Inn to create a bike station on his property that resides between his parking lot and Lucky’s Gas Station on the corner of Water St. and Myrtle. •Highly visible and high foot traffic area •Sunny spot to locate the station and continually charge the solar locks •Existing sidewalk and curbs perfect for those using the staton •Available this spring/early summer •Professional and well maintained business •Site is large enough to support 18 bikes (starting with 10) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Site Plan Site Plan 3D (Showing maximum number of bikes) * Sign and landscaping designs in subsequent pages Existing Curbs Landscaping Plan * Designed, installed, and maintained by local landscaping experts Yardmasters to ensure it is always looking great. * Concrete work completed by local Stillwater company Giestone LLC. Grey natural slab stampled concrete Dark greys with natural shades to simulate railroad ties Natural cedar mulch Bike Station Sign Bike Station Sign Materials 7’ 4” 3’ 7” Wood Frame Details: Material: Cedar 4x4s Finish: Japanese Shou Sugi Ban Technique (charred cedar with oil ﬁnish) to ﬁt with woodgrain theme of printed sign and bike chainguard and lumber history of Stillwater. 100% natural being sign is close to water Wood Frame Details: Material: Sub 6 Mil Komatex Security 7’ 4” 3’ 7” Existing street light on location already. Additional security camera will be added from Water Street Inn. Bikes can only be unlocked from sunrise to an hour before sunset. Remote monitoring of the check- out and check-in of bikes. Ability To Grow With The Community Timeline June 18-25th  Launch   May 16th  Heritage  Preservation Planning  Commission  May 9th Application Approval  May 26th 3-4 Weeks May 28th  Order  Bikes Concrete Work Install  Sign Install  Racks Land-  scaping BIKE RENTALS $9/hr INSTRUCTIONS WHERE TO GO $7/hr FIRST HOUR ADDITIONAL HOURS •You MUST be at least 18 years old to rent a bike • • Follow all the rules of the road • Always ride in control • • Use of bicycle helmet is strongly recommended • WWW.DIROOUTDOORS.COM651.233.6059 Brown’s Creek Trail Spend part of your day in Stillwater biking along the beautiful Brown’s Creek Trail. This trail begins by following the St. Croix River and then climbs out of the valley through a dense canopy along Brown’s Creek. You’ll ride past historical buildings and markers, an audio listening station, parks, and golf courses as you make your way to the Gateway State Trail. For those seeking a longer ride, the Gateway Trail travels SW into St. Paul or NE to Pine Point Park. Distance: 5.9 miles one-way to the Gateway Trail. St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail Enjoy spectacular views as you ride along the St. Croix River in both Minnesota and Wisconsin. This loop (scheduled to be completed in 2019) will take riders across the historic Stillwater Lift Bridge and up to the beautiful Wisconsin countryside. The trail makes its way back across the river via the newly constructed St. Croix Crossing Bridge and continues along the Minnesota shoreline back to downtown Stillwater. Once completed, the trail may be ridden in either direction but until the Lift Bridge restoration is completed, it must be traveled counterclockwise. Please see anticipated construction progress in the accompaning map or follow the link below for current trail conditions. Distance: 4.7 miles Other Trails The St. Croix Valley has many additional trails available offering a wide variety of experiences. Travel along country roads, through quiet neighborhoods, or have a picnic in a local park. Many of these trails connect to one another providing riders with lots of options around time and distance. Distance: Varies Looking for more detailed trail information? Scan the QR code to the right with your favorite QR code reader or visit: https://dirooutdoors.com/pages/stillwater-bike-rentals Download the MOVATIC app from the Google Play Store or the App Store. Enter payment information. Go for a ride!Lock bike to rack at bike station by inserting the pin on the rack into the lock on the front of the bike. It will automatically lock. Select & unlock desired bike by number. Inspect bike & immediately return to rack & report in App if issues are discovered. 9 Find the nearest bike station. Open the MOVATIC App & end your ride by selecting Active Rentals at the bottom of the screen and selecting ‘End Rental’. 5 61423 7 Hours: Sunrise - Sunset To learn more visit: Otto BergMemorialPark Stillwater Oak Park Heights Houlton Brown’s Creek 35 64 95 36 96 E Brekke Valley ViewPark LinearPark Autumn HillsPark PublicWorks Park Brown’s Creek Nature Preserve Brown’sCreekPark NorthlandPark MeadowLark Park RamseyGrovePark Lily LakeRecreationArea SunrisePark BensonPark Washington ScenicOverlook Park Lowell Pa rk K o l l i n e r P a r kKolliner ParkB r i d g e v i ew P a r k St. Croix River Crossing BridgeLift Brid g e StaplesField PioneerPark Park Oak ParkCrossing Park Park S WATER ST Stillwater Golf Oaks TRAI L Club MYRTLE ST CREEKBROWN’S MCKUSICK RDGATEWAYTRAILBO U T W E L L R D MCKUSICK RD 75TH ST N MANNING AVE NSTILLWATER BLVD NGREELEY ST S N OSGOOD AVE OWENS STNEAL AVES T O N E B R I D G E T R 60TH ST N 56TH ST N 58T H S T NNEAL AVE N58TH ST N 1½¾¼0 SCALE IN MILES Restrooms Parking St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail Other Trails Brown’s Creek State Trail 2018 Construction Other Trails (On Street) N TRAIL SYSTEMS Lake McKusick St. CroixRiverNOVA SCOTIAEVERY rider needs a smartphone and a credit card in order to use this bike rental system. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 16, 2018 CASE NO.: 2018-12 APPLICANT: Matt Hoefler, of HAF Architects, representing Anne Loff, of Midnight Real Estate Group REQUEST: Consideration of an amendment to Design Permit 2016-27 for the Crosby Hotel to be located at 232 Main Street South in the Downtown Design Review District ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND In late 2016 the HPC conditionally approved a design permit for the Crosby hotel to be located on North Main Street. Since the original approval was granted, the HPC has seen additional design modifications that has necessitated new Design Permits. This request is a combination of certain design changes that staff has determined to be substantial and not in conformance with the originally-approved design permit, as well as improvements requested by the HPC to be brought back for review. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of certain modifications to the hotel’s previously approved design as well as approval of all mechanical components. The modified proposal includes:  North Elevation: o The addition of balconies on the second story that will serve as an overhang above a first tory entrance.  East Elevation: o Changing single doors to double doors on the 1’ depth balcony units. o Reconsideration of full-depth balconies proposed in 2017, and partially denied by the HPC, on the second and third stories. HPC 2018-12 May 16, 2018 Page 2 of 4 o Addition of a rooftop mechanical guard rail.  South Elevation: o Second story balconies, above a kitchen expansion approved by the HPC in 2017.  Mechanical and Plumbing: o The installation of five, ground-mounted air conditioning units on the north, west and south sides of the building. All indicate o The installation of a 1,200 MBH ground mounted air intake to be situated directly to the west of the property located at 218 Main Street North. o Air conditioner units (exteriors to be black) on all façades. o A series of rooftop heating units, all situated back from the 24” parapet. o A total of 15 rooftop plumbing protrusions that will be painted black. o Three, stainless steel kitchen vents located on the southern elevation. The applicant’s submission indicates there is a request to review a roof deck. No specifications or details were included in the plans. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Municipal Code Section 31-209, Design permit states: • The Standards for Review , Sec. 31-509(f) indicates the HPC shall utilize the following standards: o Architectural character:  The suitability of the building for the intended purpose.  The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines.  The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development. o Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development. o Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources. o Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. The property is subject to the guidelines set forth in the Commercial Historic District Design Manual, as identified in the Stillwater Downtown Plan. The following guidelines can help assist the HPC in determining compliance with the guidelines as well as design consistency, detailing and materials with the existing structure and the previously approved Design Permit. DETAILING, FAÇADE OPENINGS, AND MATERIALS  …architecture should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding buildings in window shape, cornice lines and brick work.  The size and proportion of windows and door openings…should be similar to those on the adjacent facades.  Recessed entries should be…required in new storefront construction. Four quasi-private balconies are proposed for guestrooms on the Main Street façade. The balconies extend from the front face of the building. While Main Street balconies exist on modern buildings to the north, they are not common in the downtown core. Furthermore, where balconies do exist, they are either recessed within the architecture of the building HPC 2018-12 May 16, 2018 Page 3 of 4  Painted wood doors and wood framing are preferred.  façade should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades.  New buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatible with the general area. or are Juliet balconies, protruding a minimal distance from the façade wall. This is a reconsideration request. At their May 15th meeting, the City Council will determine whether or not they are favorable to allowing the HPC to reconsider this request as City Code Section 31-204, Subd. 9 indicates the same request may not be made within one year of a denial. COLOR, LIGHTING, SIGNS AND GRAPHICS, LANDSCAPING, UTILITY AND MECHANICAL AREAS  Screen exterior trash and storage areas, service yards, loading areas, transformers and air conditioning units from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a manner that is compatible with the building and site design. All roof equipment shall be screened from public view.  Use architectural elements to screen mechanical equipment As noted, there are six at-grade mechanical units proposed. While the plans show these will be screened with landscaping, an updated landscaping plan has not been submitted. Rooftop mechanicals are situated closer to the center of the building, in areas anticipated to be out of view from Main Street and North Second Street. While there are three stainless steel vents to be added to the south façade, they are situated on a westerly return. They will not be visible from Main Street. FINDINGS According to City Code Section 31-209(h), upon a finding by the design review committee that the application, subject to any conditions imposed, will meet the standards of design review, secure the purpose of the Zoning Code, the comprehensive plan and the heritage preservation ordinance, the design review committee may approve the design permit, subject to conditions as it deems necessary. If a finding is made that the permit would violate the standards of design review, it must deny the application. Staff finds the plumbing and mechanical plans to be in general conformance with the standards of design review, is compatible with the character of the design of adjacent development. However, there is not sufficient evidence to suggest the ground mounted equipment will be sufficiently screened. Staff finds the setbacks and proportion of the façade openings onto Main Street balconies are not compatible with the character of the design of adjacent development. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION HPC 2018-12 May 16, 2018 Page 4 of 4 The HPC has several alternatives related to these this request: A. Approve. If the HPC finds the attached request conforms to the standards of design review for the Downtown Design Review District, the purpose of the Zoning Code, the comprehensive plan, the heritage preservation ordinance, then then Commission could move to approve 2017-38. Staff would recommend the following minimum conditions for approval: 1. All conditions of HPC Case No. 2016-27, 2017-28, 2017-33, and 2017-38 shall remain in effect. 2. The designs shall be consistent with those on file in the Community Development Department and dated May 1, 2018, except as modified herein. 3. All balconies and guard rails shall be of a similar design and materials as previously approved. 4. Main Street balconies shall be designed as “Juliet balconies” and be faced with a similar material and design as the black steel awning. 5. All wall vents and rooftop protrusions shall be painted or powder coated black. In the event the paint begins to chip, the property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the paint uniformly. 6. An updated landscaping and screening plan, adequately screening all ground mounted mechanical units, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of mechanical permits. 7. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between “major” and “minor” is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the standards of design review for the Downtown Design Review District, the purpose of the Zoning Code, the comprehensive plan, and the heritage preservation ordinance, then the Commission could deny the request with or without prejudice. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. The denial, with prejudice, would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until January meeting and direct the applicant to modify the request for greater consistency with the Downtown Design Review guidelines. Staff recommends conditional approval HPC Case No. 2018-12. ATTACHED Updated Architectural Plans Mechanical Equipment Plans Mechanical Equipment Specifications Plumbing Plans HPC SUBMITTAL 05-01-2018 HPC SUBMITTAL 05-01-2018 HPC SUBMITTAL 05-01-2018 C GGGG1 245 6 789101112 131415161 235 69101112 13141516ABCEFGHJKNRSTVXZEHJTUWZDMPYF.88.213.8 14.513.8 14.5LM.2N.5N.98.2F.3KINGKINGKINGKINGQUEEN QUEENQUEENQUEENKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGp1H.1M.1AA694PTAC-APTAC-APTAC-AA ACC UNIT152A ACC UNIT150B UNIT153B UNIT154A UNIT156A UNIT158B UNIT160CORRIDOR130C UNIT159C UNIT157C UNIT155D1 UNIT151EMPL SUITE125G. MGR OFFICE124EMPL. LOCKER123EMPL TOILET122JAN.121ELEC/PHONE120EXERCISE119CENTER118CORRIDOR129VENDING114KITCHEN111WATER/SPRINK112WOMEN117MEN116VEST102LAUNDRY105OFFICE106MEETING ROOM107SITTING AREA108L. CHUTE115ELEV127ELEV LOBBY131STAIR C126BAR / LOUNGE109WAIT110STAIR B128SUNDRIES104PTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-A(TYP OF 2)TRTU1HPU-3FC-3FC-41HPU-5FC-56ø80 CFMCD18ø180 CFMCD120/1212/24180 CFMRG18ø48X38" AIR INTAKE LOUVER WITH 36X12" OUTSIDE AIR DUCT FOR DRYER MAKEUP AIR WITH MOTORIZED DAMPER. INTERLOCK DAMPER WITH DRYER TO OPEN DAMPER WHEN DRYER IS RUNNING. T8/6135 CFMSG1(TYP OF 4)10ø10ø10ø12øECH-1ECH-21HPU-6FC-6T12/24600 CFMRG16/630 CFMEG18ø110 CFMCD1416/88ø8ø22/622/6FC-116/810ø(TYP OF 2)12/24600 CFMRG146ø10ø300 CFMCD11HPU-1TTHPU-220/1012/241200 CFMRG16ø50 CFMCD16ø50 CFMCD1EF-1158ø150 CFM8øEF-12150 CFM8ø16ø8ø8ø(TYP OF 5)16ø12ø777777777776/630 CFMSG18ø230 CFMCD18ø230 CFMCD14ø4ø6/650 CFMEG16ø6/630 CFMEG1EF-56ø84ø4ø6/64ø2" GAS METER BY LOCAL UTILITY; 4817 CFH; 2 PSIG LEAVING PRESSURETAMPER PROOF GAS COCKEUH-1MOUNT EUH UNDER STAIRSEWH-1EWH-212/8TG1(TYP OF 2)8/8150 CFMEG1LOBBY100ELEV. LOBBY102STAIR1018/12150 CFML116"X10" RETURN AND SUPPLY DUCTS TO/FROM RTU-1 IN RATED CHASE.16/16800 CFMRG2FSD16/108/6160 CFMSG18/6160 CFMSG16/88/6160 CFMSG18/6160 CFMSG110/814/810/8 DUCT IN BULKHEAD ACROSS CORRIDOR(TYP OF 2)ROUTE DUCT IN SOFFITROUTE DUCT IN SOFFITROUTE DUCT IN SOFFITFSD2MOUNT EF IN SIDE WALL ABOVE SHOWEROFFSET EXHAUST DUCT ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON SECOND FLOORRECEPTION103LOBBY1014FC-216/12330 CFML1EDH-38ø150 CFMCD18ø250 CFMCD18ø175 CFMCD18ø175 CFMCD18ø150 CFMCD18ø200 CFMCD120/106/670 CFMEG16/680 CFMEG16/650 CFMEG16/640 CFMEG16/665 CFMEG110ø8ø4øEF-1314/1016/1018/106ø9EWH-8EWH-9WELLNESSEF-4MAU-18/12150 CFMTG18" DIA DUCT TO ABOVE8ø8ø20/108ø2M1101 1/4" GTT12/181HOOD 1HOOD 2HOOD 4HOOD 358øHOOD 518"X10" SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS ROUTED UP THROUGH SHAFT TO RTU-4 WITH FSD'S AT FLOOR PENETRATIONFSDFSD16ø12/6240 CFMSG116øTRTU-5TRTU-426"X20" SA AND RA DUCTS FROM/TO RTU-5 WITH FSD'S AT FLOOR PENETRATIONFSDFSD26ø14ø8ø20ø48/383200 CFML110ø10ø10/810/810/88ø8ø8ø16/6305 CFMSG112/6225 CFMSG1(TYP OF 6)18ø(TYP OF 10)20ø16ø36/182200 CFMRG230/121200 CFMRG226/2018/10620 CFMRG216/811HVAC ENLARGED PLAN3FOR GAS ENLARGED PLAN10/101,200 MBH GAS1 1/4" GDRYER270 MBH GAS(TYP OF 2)1" GAS CONN (TYP OF 2); SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT (TYP OF 2); VENT TO OUTDOORS3/4" G1" GFIREPLACE40 MBH GAS1" GAS CONN; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; VENT TO OUTDOORSMOTORIZED DAMPER103/4" G63/4" GAS DN FROM 2ND LEVEL1" GAS DN FROM 2ND LEVEL1-1/2" GAS UP TO 2ND LEVEL2" GFC-511FC-611FC-111FC-2111KEYED NOTESPROVIDE REFRIGERANT PIPING LINESET SIZED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.MAINTAIN 10'-0" MINIMUM BETWEEN OA INTAKE AND EXHAUST FAN OUTLET.3/4" GAS TO 300,000 BTUH (EST) LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT (FUTURE).6" OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE THRU WALL. ROUTE OUTSIDE AIR DUCT ABOVE CEILING AND TIE INTO RETURN AIR DUCT WITH BALANCING DAMPER. TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC6 WALL CAP, COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT.8" EXHAUST AIR DUCT THRU WALL. ROUTE DUCT ABOVE CEILING AND TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC8 WALL CAP, COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT.8" OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE THRU WALL. ROUTE OUTSIDE AIR DUCT ABOVE CEILING AND TIE INTO RETURN AIR DUCT WITH BALANCING DAMPER. TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC8 WALL CAP, COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT.4" EXHAUST DUCT IN WALL UP TO ABOVE.6" EXHAUST AIR DUCT THRU WALL. ROUTE DUCT ABOVE CEILING AND TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC6 WALL CAP, COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT.8" EXHAUST AIR DUCT THRU WALL. ROUTE DUCT ABOVE CEILING AND TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC8 WALL CAP, COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT.10" DRYER EXHAUST DUCT DISCHARGE THROUGH WALL AT 4' ABOVE GRADE TO MAINTAIN 10' MINIMUM BETWEEN OA INTAKE OF PTAC ABOVE AND DRYER OUTLET. TERMINATE WITH WALL CAP BROAN MODEL 441 OR EQUAL, OMIT SCREENS. ROUTE FAN COIL CONDENSATE FROM PRIMARY DRAIN AND SECONDARY DRAIN TO NEAREST FLOOR DRAIN. 234567891011DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEETIssues and Revisions:PACKAGE DESCRIPTIONISSUE DATE:02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONSPROJECT NUMBER:Date: 10/10/2017I hereby certify that this plan,specification,orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of the State of MinnesotaLic. No: 21659SCOTT D. THOMASCROSBY HOTELSTILLWATER, MNM100SDTAJKMECHANICAL PLAN -FIRST LEVEL2017-17410/10/171/8" = 1'-0"1MECHANICAL PLAN -FIRST LEVEL# DATE DESCRIPTION2 11/07/2017 REV. RTU-2 LOCATION5 02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONS 1 245 6 789101112 131415161 235 69101112 13141516ABCEFGHJKNRSTVXZEHJTUWZDMPYF.88.213.8 14.513.8 14.5LM.2N.5N.98.2F.3KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKING KINGKINGKING KINGQUEEN QUEEN KING KINGKINGKINGKING KING KINGKINGKING KINGQUEENQUEENQUEENQUEENA ACC UNIT252A ACC UNIT250B UNIT253B UNIT254A UNIT256A UNIT258B UNIT260CORRIDOR230C UNIT259C UNIT257C UNIT255D1 UNIT251B UNIT261CORRIDOR229D2 UNIT265L. CHUTE215ELEV227ELEV LOBBY231E1 UNIT271STAIR B228A UNIT262A UNIT263A UNIT264B UNIT266B UNIT268B UNIT270A UNIT267A UNIT269E2 UNIT272E3 UNIT273E6 UNIT276E5 UNIT275E4 UNIT274PTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-APTAC-BPTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-APTAC-BEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-A314ø222222222222222111111111112"X12" SUPPLY DUCT DOWN FROM ABOVE IN CHASE16/16800 CFMSG116"X10" RETURN AND SUPPLY DUCTS TO/FROM RTU-1 AND FROM/TO BELOW IN RATED CHASE.2MOUNT EF IN SIDE WALL ABOVE SHOWEROFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOROFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOORSTAIR C226PTAC-AOFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOR1OFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOROFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOROFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOR1OFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOROFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOR1OFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALL ON THIRD FLOOROFFSET EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING TO ALIGN WITH WALLS ON THIRD FLOOR4øFC-7FSD14"X10" RETURN DUCT UP TO RTU-3FSD14/14800 CFMRG226"X20" SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS FROM RTU-5 AND TO BELOW IN RATED SHAFT ENCLOSURE3/4" GAS DN TO FIREPLACE ON 1ST LEVEL1" GAS DN TO DRYERS ON 1ST LEVEL1-1/2" GAS UP FROM1ST LEVEL & 1-1/4" GASUP TO THIRD LEVEL 1" G1" GEF-B25FC-922/8600 CFMRG212/8300 CFMSG1(TYP OF 2)22/622/612/622/6(TYP OF 2)12/8300 CFMSG122/8600 CFMRG2FC-1022/612/64ø4ø(2)4" OA DUCTSTO ABOVE4ø22/8600 CFMRG222/612/6200 CFMTG1ABOVE DOOR(TYP OF 2)6/6100 CFMSG1(TYP OF 2)10/612/1016/812/1012/86/6100 CFMSG1(TYP OF 4)6ø6ø51KEYED NOTES4" EXHAUST DUCT UP FROM BELOW, (2) 4" EXHAUST DUCTS IN WALL UP TO ABOVE.4" EXHAUST DUCT IN WALL UP TO ABOVE.4" EXHAUST DUCT THRU WALL WITH PRIMEX WC4 WALL CAP.PROVIDE REFRIGERANT PIPING LINESET SIZED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.6" OA INTAKE THRU WALL. TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC6 WALL CAP. MAINTAIN 10'-0" FROM ADJACENT EXHAUST OUTLETS.2345DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEETIssues and Revisions:PACKAGE DESCRIPTIONISSUE DATE:02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONSPROJECT NUMBER:Date: 10/10/2017I hereby certify that this plan,specification,orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of the State of MinnesotaLic. No: 21659SCOTT D. THOMASCROSBY HOTELSTILLWATER, MNM101SDTAJKMECHANICAL PLAN -SECOND LEVEL2017-17410/10/171/8" = 1'-0"1MECHANICAL PLAN -SECOND LEVEL5# DATE DESCRIPTION2 11/07/2017 REV. RTU-2 LOCATION5 02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONS 1 245 6 789101112 131415161 235 69101112 13141516ABCEFGHJKNRSTVXZEHJTUWZDMPYF.88.213.8 14.513.8 14.5LM.2N.5N.98.2F.3KINGKINGKINGKINGKINGKINGQUEENQUEENKING KING KINGKING QUEENQUEENKINGKINGKING A ACC UNIT352A ACC UNIT350F2 SUITE354A UNIT356A UNIT358B UNIT360CORRIDOR330C UNIT359C UNIT357C1 UNIT355CORRIDOR329L. CHUTE315ELEV327ELEV LOBBY331MENS375E1 UNIT371STAIR B328F1 SUITE362F2 SUITE366B UNIT370F3 ACC SUITE367E2 UNIT372E3 UNIT373STORAGE379E7 UNIT378WATERELEMENT377PTAC-APTAC-APTAC-CPTAC-APTAC-APTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-APTAC-BPTAC-BPTAC-APTAC-BEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-AEF-A16"X10" RETURN AND SUPPLY DUCTS TO/FROM RTU-2 ON ROOF16"X10" RETURN DUCT TO RTU-3 ON ROOFBULKHEAD ACROSS CORRIDOR24/12800 CFMSG116"X10" RETURN AND SUPPLY DUCTS TO/FROM RTU-1 AND FROM/TO BELOW IN RATED CHASE12223232222222411141111112/24800 CFMRG1FSD16/1016/1012"X12" SUPPLY DUCT DOWN TO BELOW IN CHASE2MOUNT EF IN SIDE WALL ABOVE SHOWERSTORAGE349WOMENS374STAIR C326EF-AEF-934" DIA DRYER EXHAUST UP THRU ROOF 10'-0" MIN FROM ROOF EDGEDRYER EXHAUST UP THRU ROOF 24/12TG1EF-10PTAC-APTAC-C5FC-816"X10" SUPPLY DUCT FROM RTU-3 ON ROOFPTAC-C26"X20" SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS FROM RTU-5 AND TO BELOW IN RATED SHAFT ENCLOSURE(TYP OF 2)18"X10" SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS FROM/TO RTU-3 ON ROOF AND TO BELOW IN CHASEB-1BOILER EMERGENCY POWER OFF SWITCHFIREPLACE40 MBH GASFIREPLACE40 MBH GAS600 MBH3/4" G3/4" G3/4" GAS UP TO RTU-2 ON ROOF1-1/4" GAS UP FROM 2ND LEVEL & 3/4" GAS UP TO RTU-1, 3, 4, & 5 ON ROOF1" GAS CONN; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; VENT TO OUTDOORSGAS PRESSURE REGULATOR. VENT TO OUTDOORS3/4" G1" G1" GAS CONN; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; VENT TO OUTDOORS1" G1" G1" GP-2EF-B3EF-B3EF-B3EF-BEF-B21 1/4" HWR1 1/4" HWS1 1/4" HWR1 1/4" HWS4M110P-151-1/4" HWS AND HWR LINES TO SNOW MELT MANIFOLD IN STORAGE ROOM WITH WALL ACCESS PANEL. ROUTE (6) SNOW MELT LOOPS WITH TUBES 6" APART IN SHADED AREA INCLUDING POOL DECK AND POOL COPING.4" OA DUCT UP FROM BELOW4ø(2) 4" OA DUCTS UP THROUGH ROOF4øPTAC-AFC-1124/10800 CFMRG210/614/816/820/820/86/675 CFMSG1(TYP OF 4)6/6100 CFMSG1(TYP OF 5)6ø6ø624/820/812/810/66/690 CFMSG1(TYP OF 2)6/6110 CFMSG1(TYP OF 2)8/6120 CFMSG1(TYP OF 5)22/10750 CFMRG212/8250 CFMRG218/824/88ø8" OA DUCT FROM ABOVE1KEYED NOTES(2) 4" EXHAUST DUCT UP FROM BELOW, (3) 4" EXHAUST DUCTS IN WALL UP TO ABOVE.4" EXHAUST DUCT UP FROM BELOW, (2) 4" EXHAUST DUCTS IN WALL UP TO ABOVE.4" EXHAUST DUCT IN WALL UP TO ABOVE.(2) 4" EXHAUST DUCT UP FROM BELOW, (2) 4" EXHAUST DUCTS IN WALLPOOL EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED IN STORAGE ROOM 349. REFER TO POOL EQUIPMENT DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.6" OA INTAKE THRU WALL. TERMINATE WITH PRIMEX WC6 WALL CAP. MAINTAIN 10'-0" FROM ADJACENT EXHAUST OUTLETS.23456DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEETIssues and Revisions:PACKAGE DESCRIPTIONISSUE DATE:02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONSPROJECT NUMBER:Date: 10/10/2017I hereby certify that this plan,specification,orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of the State of MinnesotaLic. No: 21659SCOTT D. THOMASCROSBY HOTELSTILLWATER, MNM102SDTAJKMECHANICAL PLAN -THIRD LEVEL2017-17410/10/171/8" = 1'-0"1MECHANICAL PLAN -THIRD LEVEL5# DATE DESCRIPTION2 11/07/2017 REV. RTU-2 LOCATION5 02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONS 1 245 6 789101112 131415161 235 69101112 13141516ABCEFGHJKNRSTVXZEHJTUWZDMPYF.88.213.8 14.513.8 14.5LM.2N.5N.98.2F.311111111111111111111111114"X10" RETURN DUCT ROUTED UP THROUGH DOGHOUSE ON ROOF AND OVER ROOF TO RTU-3 WITH FSD AT SHAFT PENETRATIONRTU-2RTU-3RTU-120"X10" RETURN AND SUPPLY DUCTS TO/FROM RTU-2. TRANSITION IN CURB TO 16"X10" FOR RTU CONNECTION.40 MBH GAS16"X10" RETURN AND SUPPLY DUCTS TO/FROM RTU-1. OFFSET DUCTS IN CURB TO ALIGN WITH CHASE BELOW3/4" GOA INTAKE THIS SIDE OF RTU-2. MAINTAIN 10'-0" CLEARANCE FROM ADJACENT EXHAUST OUTLETS.MAINTAIN 10'-0" CLEAR BETWEEN RTU AND EDGE OF ROOF.25HPU-7HPU-814"X10" SUPPLY DUCT FROM RTU-3 DOWN THROUGH ROOF10/14EF-1EF-2EF-3RTU-45RTU-518"X10" SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS ROUTED UP THROUGH DOGHOUSE ON ROOF AND OVER ROOF TO RTU-4 WITH FSD'S AT SHAFT PENETRATIONFSDFSDFSD26"X20" SUPPLY AND RETURN DUCTS FROM RTU-5 DOWN THROUGH ROOF TRANSITION IN ROOF CURB40 MBH GAS40 MBH GAS60 MBH GAS250 MBH GAS13/4" GAS UP FROM THIRD LEVEL3/4" GAS UP FROM THIRD LEVEL3/4" G3/4" G3/4" G3/4" GGAS CONN & GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS CONN & GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS CONN & GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS CONN & GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; SEE GAS CONN DETAILSGAS CONN & GAS PRESSURE REGULATOR -2 PSIG ENT; SEE GAS CONN DETAILS16" DIA BOILER VENT AND COMBUSTION AIR CPVC VENT THROUGH ROOF. VENT PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. TERMINATE WITH GOOSENECK. AIR INTAKE MIN 30" ABOVE ROOF, VENT MIN 12" HIGHER THAN AIR INTAKE. MIN. 3' SEPARATION BETWEEN VENT AND OA INTAKE.2HPU-922HPU-10(2) 4" OA INTAKE DUCTS UPTHROUGH ROOF. TERMINATEWITH GOOSENECKS. MAINTAIN10'-0" MIN FROM EXHAUST OUTLETS.HPU-1128" DIA OA INTAKE TO BELOW. TERMINATE WITH GOOSENECK. MIN 10'-0" FROM EXHAUST AIR OUTLETS.1KEYED NOTES4" EXHAUST DUCT UP FROM BELOW. TERMINATE WITH GOOSENECK.PROVIDE REFRIGERANT PIPING LINESET SIZED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.2DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEETIssues and Revisions:PACKAGE DESCRIPTIONISSUE DATE:02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONSPROJECT NUMBER:Date: 10/10/2017I hereby certify that this plan,specification,orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of the State of MinnesotaLic. No: 21659SCOTT D. THOMASCROSBY HOTELSTILLWATER, MNM103SDTAJKMECHANICAL ROOFPLAN2017-17410/10/171/8" = 1'-0"1MECHANICAL PLAN -ROOF# DATE DESCRIPTION2 11/07/2017 REV. RTU-2 LOCATION5 02/08/2018 PLAN REVISIONS Certified Drawing for RTU-1-2 Project: Crosby Hotel 02/22/2018 Prepared By: 09:46AM Certified Drawing Packaged RTU Builder (Bryant) 1.29h Page 5 of 52 Certified Drawing for RTU-4 Project: Crosby Hotel 02/22/2018 Prepared By: 09:46AM Certified Drawing Packaged RTU Builder (Bryant) 1.29h Page 15 of 52 Certified Drawing for RTU-5 Project: Crosby Hotel 02/22/2018 Prepared By: 09:46AM Certified Drawing Packaged RTU Builder (Bryant) 1.29h Page 25 of 52 Certified Drawing for RTU-3 Project: Crosby Hotel 02/22/2018 Prepared By: 09:46AM Certified Drawing Packaged RTU Builder (Bryant) 1.29h Page 45 of 52 9DIMENSIONS -- ENGLISHWhen installing, allow sufficient space for airflow clearance, wiring, refrigerant piping, and service. Allow 24 in. (609.6 mm) clearance to service end of unit and 48 in. (1219.2 mm) (above unit. For proper airflow, a 6–in. (152.4 mm) clearance on 1 side of unit and 12–in. (304.8 mm) on all remaining sides must be maintained. Maintain a distance of 24 in. (609.6 mm) between units or 18 in. (457.2 mm) if no overhang within 12 ft. (3.66 m) Position so water, snow, or ice from roof or eaves cannot fall directly on unit. NOTE: 18” (457.2 mm) clearance option described above is approved for outdoor units with wire grille coil guard only. Units with louver panels require 24” (609.6 mm) between units. On rooftop applications, locate unit at least 6 in. (152.4 mm) above roof surface. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 161 2 3 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16ABCEFGHJKNRSTVXZEHJTUWZDMPYF.88.213.8 14.513.8 14.5LM.2N.5N.98.2F.36" ERD6" RD6" ERD6" RD6" RD6" ERD6" ERD6" RD6" ERD6" RD4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR44" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTR4" VTRDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SHEETIssues and Revisions:PACKAGE DESCRIPTIONISSUE DATE:01/31/2018 PLAN REVISIONSPROJECT NUMBER:Date: 10/10/2017I hereby certify that this plan,specification,orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed ProfessionalEngineer under the laws of the State of MinnesotaLic. No: 21659SCOTT D. THOMASCROSBY HOTELSTILLWATER, MNP1035&65&65&65&6,&-,&-,&-,&-PLUMBING ROOFPLAN2017-17410/10/171/8" = 1'-0"1PLUMBING PLAN -ROOF '$7( '(6&5,37,21 3/$15(9,6,216 2018 01 29 Plumbing Coordination Set.pdf 5 2/14/2018 10:23:35 AM