Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-18 HPC Packeti11watt THE BIRTHPLACEOFMINNESOTA -' AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North April 18th, 2018 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of March 21st, 2018 regular meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Case No. 2018-07: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for new business signage for the property located at 214 Main St S in the CBD District. Mike Lynskey, property owner and Kathy Lipps, applicant. 3. Case No. 2018-09: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for window replacement for the property located at 101 3rd St S in the CBD District. Edward Schmidt, applicant. VI. PUBLIC HEARING 4. Case No. 2018-08: Consideration of a Design Review Permit to build a new single family home with an attached two car garage located at 107 Everett St S in the RB District. Mark and Karen Petersen. VII. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 5. National Preservation Month and Preservation Awards (May) VIII. STAFF UPDATES/FYI IX. ADJOURNMENT TO THE JOINT HPC AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING JOINT HPC AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 7:30 P.M. i \ Ater THE OIRTNPLACE OF NINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING March 21, 2018 7:00 P.M. Chairman Larson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present: Commissioners Goodman, Krakowski, Mino, Welty, Chairman Larson, Council Representative Junker Absent: Commissioners Hadrits and Steinwall Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of February 21, 2018 meeting minutes Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Welty, to approve the minutes of the February 21, 2018 meeting. All in favor, 5-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2018-04: An update to the Design Permit for a signage, lighting and outdoor dining plan for the property located at 402 Main Street South. Corey Burstad of The Elevage Group, property owner and Christine Pecard, applicant. Case No. 2018-05: Consideration of a Design Permit for new business signage for the property located at 232 Main Street South. Yani Abotbul, property owner. Motion by Commissioner Krakowski, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor, 5-0. NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2018-06: Consideration of a Design Review Permit for new business signage and exterior painting for the property located at 226 Main Street South in the DBD District. Gabi Sabongi, property owner and Melissa Parkos, applicant. City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting approval of exterior painting of the existing sage and white facade elements to black, dark gray and cream; and the installation of one, 36" by 20" projecting painted wood sign proposed to be hung from the existing wrought iron mount. The sign would read "Jori & June." The applicant has indicated they may desire to have a metal sign in lieu of wood. On the basis HPC Case No. 2018-06 conforms to the Downtown Design Review District standards, staff recommends approval with six conditions. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting March 21, 2018 Chairman Larson suggested that the wood slats above the storefront be removed if that is possible to do without damaging the building. Commissioner Welty suggested if they can't be removed, they could be painted to match the brick. Motion by Commissioner Welty, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve Case No. 2018-06, Design Review Permit for new business signage and exterior painting for the property located at 226 Main Street South, with the six conditions recommended by staff, adding Condition #7 that the wood slats above the storefront shall be removed or painted to match the brick. All in favor, 5-0. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION Small Wireless future Zoning Text Amendment Ms. Wittman informed the Commission that staff has completed a legislative version of the Zoning Text Amendment which would amend six sections of the City Code. In addition to establishing a greater purpose for right-of-way (ROW) management, tying Design Permitting to the HPC, and an overhaul of the existing Towers and Antenna Zoning Code section, there are specific sections pertaining to design review and permitting. She provided an example of a micro -wireless facility. Commission consensus was that it would be alright for micro -wireless facilities to be approved administratively, if there were a limit on how many per pole. She will bring the proposed ordinance to the next meeting for further review. Environmental Resource Management Invitations to Comment Ms. Wittman reported that the City has received two Invitations to Comment from Environmental Resources Management (ERM) regarding the future installation of two cellular towers, one of which would be located in the City of Stillwater. The HPC should comment on the potential affect to historic resources. There are no historic properties within 500+ feet of the proposed location, therefore staff believes that the tower will not impact historic properties. The Commission was in agreement. STAFF UPDATES 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update City Planner Wittman stated that the City Council has approved a contract with Landscape Research LLC to assist the HPC with the update of the Historic Resources chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The update will be done in conjunction with an HPC advisory committee. Landscape Research LLC is preparing a final work schedule. It is anticipated the HPC and its committee will meet with the consultants in April, prior to the HPC's regularly -scheduled meeting. 2018 Commission Appointments and Nominations Ms. Wit man stated that the seats of Chairman Larson (appointed in 2012) and Commissioner Krakowski (appointed in 2009) will expire. Commissioner Krakowski has expressed an interest in continuing to serve. Two new applications have been received to date. She will check with City Clerk Ward about whether interviews are required and whether two Council members need to interview Chairman Larson for reappointment. Chairman Larson suggested the chair should rotate occasionally. Ms. Wittman said the chair is chosen in May. National Preservation Month and Preservation Awards (May) Page 2 of 3 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting March 21, 2018 City Planner Wittman noted that May is National Historic Preservation month, when the City awards individuals and organizations whose actions have furthered historic preservation efforts in the community. She led discussion of possible awardees. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Goodman, seconded by Chairman Larson, to adjourn. All in favor, 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:02 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink, Recording Secretary Page 3 of 3 fflwater !i F 6'.RTFV P14 T; E 91F MINNFSOITA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 18, 2017 CASE NO.: 2018-07 APPLICANT: Kathy Lipps, representing Our Bridal Shop REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for new signage at 214 Main Street South, in the Downtown Design Review District. ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU-Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit to replace an unlit, flat projecting sign at 214 Main Street South. The sign will measure 21" tall and 39" in length. The (approximately) 6 square foot, vinyl or painted aluminum sign board will read "Our Bridal Shop". This sign will replace the business's existing but the existing bracket will remain. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Projecting signs are permitted by the sign ordinance so long as the sign is no greater than six (6) square feet. = Municipal Code Section 31-509, Design permit states: • The Standards for Review, Sec. 31-509(f) indicates the HPC shall utilize the following standards: o Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development. o Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. The Downtown Design Manual section pertaining to "Sign and Graphics" is attached for Commission review. FINDINGS This projecting sign uses simple, bold type style lettering in colors that keep with the Victorian tradition. The sign has sufficient contrast between the black lettering and the ivory background. While painted wood is encouraged, painted aluminum signs have also been determined to be consistent with the Downtown Historic District. ALTERNATIVES The HPC has alternatives related to this request. A. Approve. If the proposed application meets the Design Permit standards and the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2018-07. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: a. The sign shall not be greater than six (6) square feet. b. If the sign is to be located in the place of an existing sign, the installation shall utilize existing drill holes for mounting. Any existing drill holes not utilized will be patched. c. The sign shall hang a minimum of eight feet off of the public sidewalk area. d. The sign shall obtain a Sign Permit prior to the installation of the sign. e. All modifications shall be reviewed and approved prior to be implemented. Major modifications shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission; minor modifications shall be reviewed by staff. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Design Permit standards, and the design review district guidelines, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request may be tabled to the following meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends conditional approval of HPC Case No. 2018-07 for the Our Bridal Shop projecting sign. 214 Main Street South Case No. HPC 2018-07 Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS Sign Design Specifications Downtown Design Review District Guidelines (pages 26-33) 214 Main Street South Case No. HPC 2018-07 Page 3 of 3 3/14/2018 storefront.jpg '] Ur IISA.CLUAr1 , - S Re\ act vrNe,r\k dh Cl-"^'re-ram- 21„hx39"w 48" wide bracket 1U011-u\ �l bkG k-C-Lr j.s https://mail. google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/ 15f92bdc28cccfe l ?projector=1 &messagePartld=0.1 https://mail .google.com/mail/u/0/#search/lebosi gn/15c70fe3330906d 1?projector=1&messagePartld=0.1.7 1/1 1/1 Signs and Graphics Background During the peak of commercial activity in Stillwater, the signs in the historic commercial district had a distinct character that was a part of the overall streetscape. Many of the historic buildings were built to accommodate a storefront sign band in their original design. The efforts of the Design Manual are not meant to turn back the clock, but rather to preserve and enhance that distinct and historic character of Stillwater. All signage is subject to Stillwater building and zoning codes. 1. QUANTITIES, LOCATION AND SIZE Background In the past, streetscapes had a variety of sign types that not only identified the business, but also the name of the buildings, dates of construction, etc. The signs were simple, bold and well Crafted. Lettering was in clear, no-nonsense styles, maximizing the contrast between the background and the lettering. Varying sign types can be found in the historic streetscape including: (1) architectural signs, (2) storefront signs, (3) window signs, (4) awnings, (5) projecting signs, and (6) painted wall signs and murals. Every building should select the most appropriate sign type for its architecture and location. Guidelines • The maintenance and restoration of any existing historic signs is encouraged in lieu of replacement. • Signage for a business not located within the building is not acceptable. a- • Only one sign that contains the business name or graphic logo is permitted per street facing side. The exception is that a window sign may be used in addition to other sign types. • Signage should be located in such a way as to not obscure any architectural features of the building. A projecting sign with two faces is considered one sign. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 26 Signs and Graphics a. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNS Backround Architectural signs are integrated into the building fabric and are constructed of permanent materials such as stone or metal. Names and the dates of construction were common signs included on the facade. They were typically located in the roof parapet detailing or in a cornerstone detail. These add a sense of history and place to the character and fabric of Stillwater. Guidelines • Preserve existing architectural signs. • Promote the use of the original building names in new signage. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 27 Signs and Graphics b. STOREFRONT SIGNS Backround Storefront signs are those which are located on the horizontal band dividing the storefront windows from the upper facade of the building. Guidelines • The storefront sign should be used to display the primarily name of the business only. Use only one line of lettering if possible, leaving out secondary information. • Use simple, bold lettering with sufficient contrast between the lettering and the background. • "Trademark" or "Logo" signs may not be acceptable if the color and character of the sign is not in keeping with the historic character of the area. • The maximum area of the sign is regulated by the sign ordinance. • Graphics in the sign are included in the maximum allowable area. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 28 Signs and Graphics c. WINDOW SIGNS Background Window signs are applied inside the glass of storefront windows, upper floor windows and doorways. Their main focus was on the approaching pedestrian; therefore the signs gave more detailed information about the business. Guidelines • It may often be desirable to keep the display space clear. In these cases, insert the sign at the base or the head of the window, or both. • Keep the lettering small remembering that the reader will be in close proximity to the sign. Use several lines where necessaiy and consider curving the top line at the head of the window. • Lettering formed with neon may be used in the inside of the window, provided the size, light intensity, color and style are consistent with the theme of the buildong. • Total sign area in the window should not exceed one-third of the window area. • Display street numbers on or directly above the door, and business hours on the inside of the door or in an adjacent window. 'iiiIIIMil fl; Trill .1 1� 1 r ■ t �� 1 P 11 ` DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 29 Signs and Graphics d. PROJECTING SIGNS Background Projecting signs are at right angles to the building face, either fixed to the wall or hanging from a bracket. Their major advantage over storefront or window signs is their ability to be seen by pedestrians and motorists from a distance down the street. If they get too large, however, they can obscure each other, so it is important to keep them small and simple. Guidelines • The maximum area of the sign and the minimum height above the sidewalk is regulated by the sign ordinance. • Use materials consistent with the period, such as wood signboards and metal brackets. 45 DEGREES DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 30 Signs and Graphics e. PAINTED WALL SIGNS & MURALS Background Painted wall signs occasionally appeared on the side of buildings at comer locations, or where a low adjacent roofline exposed an expanse of plain brick wall above. As these signs were high on the building, the message was simple and the lettering was large and bold. In the time period of the 1920's — 1950's, there were occasions of painted advertising in these areas. More recently, there have been murals created on walls of "non- contributing" buildings, or on the bac of "non-contributing" buildings, or on the back walls of "contributing" buildings. These have been addressed on a case -by -case basis. Guidelines • Where existing painted wall signs can still he found, leave them exposed, or restore them to their original colors. • No new wall signs or murals should he introduced on historic "contributing" buildings. • Murals on "non-contributing" buildings have been allowed with individual review, provided they have a historic theme, and do not advertise an existing business or company. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 31 Signs and Graphics 2. COORDINATION OF SIGNS Backround At the time of the commercial boom in Stillwater (1870's — 1900's) most buildings were owned and occupied by single businesses. Merchants thought of their entire facade as potential sign space. For this reason, the signs were all well coordinated. Ownership and business use patterns have changed over the years, and many buildings now contain multiple businesses. It is important that tenants and owners cooperate to design a sign package, which will help to reunify the building facade. Guidelines • Multiple -tenant buildings should submit a Sign Package that includes building elevations (drawn to scale), sign types, locations and sizes. Do not put up signs piecemeal. View the building as a whole and plan a unified design strategy to take advantage of all possible sign locations. • Tenants and owners should use a common lettering style and color scheme on the building • Design the Sign Package to emphasize the whole width and geometry of storefronts and individual buildings. Avoid the use of unified signage across multiple buildings thai are obviously separate and of different and distinct scale or architecture. • Consider giving the entire building an identifiable name, i.e. "Stillwater Mercantile", with individual business signs near the entrances, or on a common directory. BUILDING SIGN PROGRAM 7-1 E. Tenant A: 14 sq. ft. sign Tenant B: 21 sq. ft. sign Tenant C: 28 sq. ft. sign Tenant D: 28 sq. ft. sign Tenant E: 21 sq. ft. sign DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 32 Signs and Graphics 3. MATERIALS Background Apart from architectual signs, the original exterior signs of Stillwater were constructed of wood and painted. Window signs were painted, etched or gilded. Today a great range of materials are available, including metals and plastics, and their unconditioned use can lead to a confusion of signage, which detracts from the unique character of Stillwater. Modern sign materials are acceptable provided their design is handled with an understanding of the Victorian spirit. An exception is made in the case of internally lit and back -lit signs, their nature is inherently foreign to the solid character of brick and wood Victorian architecture and they are bound to strike a false and distracting note in the streetscape. Guidelines • Use painted wood where practicable. It is the authentic material and will look appropriate against the weathered brick of Stillwater's commercial facades. Modern materials that simulate wood may be acceptable, and will be reviewed on a case -by - case basis. • Neon may be used as an interior window sign only. • Backlit and internally lit signs are not appropriate. • Supporting brackets for projecting signs should be metal, painted black. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 33 Signs and Graphics 4. SHAPE OF SIGNS Background The signs of Stillwater were forthright and utilitarian. Simple, framed rectangular boards were constructed to fill the available spaces. A common type was the long narrow sign, which stretched across the top of the storefront windows. Guidelines • Design the sign shape to fit and fill the available space. Consider using long narrow signs spanning the full width of the facade. • If a projecting sign is used, keep it simple in shape, small in size and utilitarian in design. • Window signs should be symmetrical in layout and position. Top lines may be curved. 5. COLOR Background The commercial structures of this time period did not use a wide range of paint colors. The palette was particularly narrow; dark green, dark brown and black were common. Signs were painted for contrast rather than for color -black letters on a white background, gold letters on a black background. Complete ranges of paint colors are available today, ranging from the jarring to the pastel. If they are used indiscriminately, the unique historic character of Stillwater will be destroyed. Guidelines • Choose subdued colors and dark tones in keeping with the Victorian tradition. Properly selected combinations of dark brown and green, black, off-white and gold are all appropriate. • Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. • Support brackets of projecting signs should be black. 6. LETTERING Background Most of the original signs in Stillwater were strictly practical -the lettering had to be large enough to have an impact at the required viewing distance, and clear enough to be readily legible. Generally the style was a plain bold or classic uppercase arranged symmetrically, and one style was often repeated on various signs applied to one building. Guidelines • Choose a bold and simple type style and use it on all appropriate signs. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 34 Signs and Graphics 7. LIGHTING Background In the nineteenth century, Stillwater would have been dimly lit. Today we expect our cities to be bright and lively at night. We must achieve an acceptable standard of lighting without compromising the essential character of the historic setting. Guidelines • Use incandescent indirect lighting and place spotlights discreetly, in such a way as to shield the source from pedestrians and vehicular traffic. • Neon lights are permitted in window signs only. Design them with respect for the historic ambiance of the area. • Do not use flashing, moving or intermittent lights. • Do not use internally or back -lit signs, either projecting, wall mounted, or hung inside the window. • Do not use changeable or movable letters or graphics. 8. INSTALLATION Background With the high turnover of businesses in many of the historic buildings, signage has become temporary in nature. Efforts must be made to make sure that damage to buildings is minimized when signage is installed. Guidelines • The installation of any signage or graphics must have a minimal impact on the building and must allow the building to return to its original condition upon signage removal. • Reuse of existing mounting brackets, studs or holes is desirable. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 35 fflwater !i F 6'.RTFV P14 T; E 91F MINNFSOITA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 18, 2017 CASE NO.: 2018-09 APPLICANT: Edward J. Schmidt, property owner REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for window replacement for the structure located at 101 3rd Street South, in the Downtown Design Review District. ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU-Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit to replace all windows on the structure with vinyl wrapped, wood Anderson 200 series windows in a sand finish to match the existing, upper story horizontal vinyl siding. The proposal includes a slight modification of the existing, lower level windows as the 5' wide by 6' tall window opening is too large for a double hung window to operate efficiently. Therefore, the application is proposing the replacement of the single, double hung window with two, double hung windows separated by a grille. With the exception of the smallest openings (visually represented as the window on the far left of the applicant's exterior facade photo), all first story openings on the north and east facades will be (approximately) 6' tall. The openings, when finished, will have solider coursing and exterior mulleins in a five over five pattern, as exists today. The upper story windows, where possible, will be replaced 1:1 with the same level of detail and trim as the lower level windows. Exterior mulleins will be reduced to between four over four, down to two over two, depending on the overall window size. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES City Code Chapter 34, Building Demolition, indicates demolition is the removal of more than 20% of the front facade of a structure built prior to 1946 and worthy of such designation because of its historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological or engineering significance. While the owner is proposing removing some of the northern facade, this is to create larger window openings to not only bring greater amounts of sunlight and airflow into the building but to also help provide for greater design consistency on this facade. While this is not listed as a contributing building in the Stillwater Commercial Historic District, the property is subject to the guidelines set forth in the Downtown Design Review Manual. The manual specifically indicates: ■ The proportion of infill buildings should be sympathetic to the proportion of their neighbors. ■ Break Up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures. ■ Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent structures. FINDINGS The removal of historic material does not equal 20% or greater of the total northern facade. Additionally, the new openings and windows will facade details will not only help break up the building's mass but will also have similar design detail found on the building today. Additionally, the HPC has previously found vinyl clad, wood windows to be consistent with the design guidelines of the Downtown Historic District. ALTERNATIVES The HPC has alternatives related to this request. A. Approve. If the proposed application meets the Design Permit standards and the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2018-09. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: a. The project shall conform to the design plans submitted by the applicant and on file with this HPC Case No. 2018-09. b. The windows shall be trimmed in a sand tone finish to match the second story facade. c. All window brick openings will have the coursing detail as exists today. d. The windows shall have exterior mulleins. The patterns shall be five over five on the lower level to two over two on the upper level. e. All modifications shall be reviewed and approved prior to be implemented. Major modifications shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission; minor modifications shall be reviewed by staff. B. Approve in part. 101 3rd Street South Case No. HPC 2018-09 Page 2 of 3 C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Design Permit standards, and the design review district guidelines, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request may be tabled to the following meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends conditional approval of HPC Case No. 2018-09 for the window replacement project to be located at 101 3rd Street South. ATTACHMENTS Exterior Facade Details Window Specifications (3 pages) 101 3rd Street South Case No. HPC 2018-09 Page 3 of 3 The Home Depot Special Order Quote Customer: EDWARD SCHMIDT Address: 11205 ST CROIX TRL N STILLWATER, MN 55082 Phone 1: 612-889-9832 Phone 2: 612-889-9832 Email: EDATEKS@ICLOUD.COM ti Customer Agreement #: H2801-52205 Printed Date: 4/9/2018 Store: 2801 Associate: MICHAEL Address: 2360 WHITE BEAR AVE NO MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 Phone: 651-770-9600 All prices are subject to change. Customer is responsible for verifying product selections. Andersen `I 0 Cif 0 � tt b6; w ,?10044$•000515 d II awl oatr� AnWrk:an Crallsnlari r>Andrsen r •4 Pre -Savings Total: Total Savings: Pre -Tax Price: $2,038.06 ($305.92) $1,732.14 Price Valid Through: 4/11/2018 The Home Depot will not accept returns for the below produc Standard Width = RO: 28" I UNIT: 2 1/2" Standard Height = RO: 72" I UNIT: 7 1/2" Frame Width = 27 1/2 Frame Height = 71 1/2 uen##ty. 7 Tot7)•Sa\rings 100-1 200 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung Equal Sash , AA , 27.5 x 71.5 , / Sandtone - Pine Unfinished 100-2 Insect Screen 1: 200 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung 244DH2460 Full Screen Fiberglass Sandtone PN:0833418 Version:03/01/2018 100-3 Insect Screen 1: 200 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung 244DH2460 Full Screen Fiberglass Sandtone PN:0833418 Version:03/01/2018 $766.45 $ 651.40 $34.62 $29.42 $34.62 $29.42 1 1 1 ($115.05) $651 ($5.20) $2.9 ($5.20) $29 200 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung Overall Joined Rough Opening = 56" x 72" Overall Joined Unit = 55 1/2" x 71 1/2" Installation Zip Code = 55109 U.S. ENERGY STAR® Climate Zone = Northern Search by Unit Code = No Standard Width = RO: 28" I UNIT: 27 1/2" Standard Height= RO: 72" I UNIT: 71 1/2" Frame Width = 27 1/2 Frame Height = 71 1/2 Unit Code = 244DH2460 Frame Depth = 3 1/4" Venting / Handing = AA Exterior Color = Sandtone Interior Species = Pine Interior Finish Color = Unfinished Glass Construction Type = Dual Pane Glass Option = Low-E High Altitude Breather Tubes = No Begin Line 100 Descriptions ---- Line 100-1---- Glass Strength = Standard Glass Tint = No Tint Specialty Glass = None Gas Fill = Argon Unit 1 Lower Glass, 2 Lower Glass: None Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: Colonial Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: Grille Pattern = Colonial Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: Grille Bar Width = 3/4" Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: Exterior Grille Color = Sandtone Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: Interior Grille Color = Sandtone Unit 1 Upper Glass, 2 Upper Glass: 3W2H Grille Alignment Type = Standard Grille Alignment Lock Hardware Color/Finish = Stone (Factory Exterior Trim Style = None Extension Jamb Type = None Re -Order Item = No Room Location = None Unit U-Factor = 0.29 Unit Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) = 0.29 U.S. ENERGY STAR Certified = No Clear Opening Width = 24.56 Clear Opening Height = 32.95 Clear Opening Area = 5.62 Insect Screen 1 Part Number = 0833418 Vertical Factory 0.5" thick, 71.5" length SKU = 290067 Vendor Name = S/0 ANDERSEN LOGISTICS Vendor Number = 60509030 Customer Service = (888) 888-7020 Catalog Version Date = 03/01/2018 Page 1 of 3 Date Printed: 4/9/2018 12:10 Applied) Window Opening Control Device = No Security Sensor Type = None Insect Screen Type = Full Screen Insect Screen Material = Fiberglass Insect Screen Color = Sandtone ---- Lines 100-2 to 100-3 have the same description as line 100-1---- Andersen si wiNDuws•Doans 11rr eric in .,.._.ice Crs�ismail _ End Line 100 Descriptions 200-1 200 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung Equal Sash , AA , 35.5 x 71.5 , / Sandtone - Pine Unfinished 200-2 Insect Screen 1: 200 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung 244DH3060 Full Screen Fiberglass Sandtone PN:0833434 Version:03/01/2018 00 Series Tilt -Wash Double -Hung )verall Rough Opening = 36" x 72" lverall Unit = 35 1/2" x 71 1/2" nstallation Zip Code = 55109 J.S. ENERGY STAR® Climate Zone = Northern search by Unit Code = No standard Width = RO: 36" I UNIT: 35 1/2" standard Height = RO: 72" I UNIT: 71 1/2" :rame Width = 35 1/2 :rame Height = 71 1/2 Jnit Code = 244DH3060 rame Depth = 3 1/4" tenting / Handing = AA :xterior Color = Sandtone nterior Species = Pine nterior Finish Color = Unfinished ilass Construction Type = Dual Pane ilass Option = Low-E $379.77 $322.77 $37.43 $31.81 Begin Line 200 Descriptions Standard Width = RO: 36" I UNIT: 35 1/2" Standard Height = RO: 72" I UNIT: 71 1/2" Frame Width = 35 1/2 Frame Height = 71 1/2 Ot ($57.00) ($5.62) $322.77 $31.81 ---- Line 200-1---- High Altitude Breather Tubes = No Glass Strength = Standard Glass Tint = No Tint Specialty Glass = None Gas Fill = Argon Unit 1 Lower Glass: None Unit 1 Upper Glass: Finelight Grilles -Between -the - Glass Unit 1 Upper Glass: Colonial Unit 1 Upper Glass: Grille Pattern = Colonial Unit 1 Upper Glass: Grille Bar Width = 3/4" Unit 1 Upper Glass: Exterior Grille Color = Sandtone Unit 1 Upper Glass: Interior Grille Color = Sandtone Unit 1 Upper Glass: 3W2H Grille Alignment Type = Standard Grille Alignment Lock Hardware Color/Finish = Stone (Factory Applied) Window Opening Control Device = No Security Sensor Type = None Insect Screen Type = Full Screen ---- Line 200-2 Description is the same as line 200-1 -- End Line 200 Descriptions Insect Screen Material = Fiberglass Insect Screen Color = Sandtone Exterior Trim Style = None Extension Jamb Type = None Re -Order Item = No Room Location = None Unit U-Factor = 0.29 Unit Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) = 0.29 U.S. ENERGY STAR Certified = No Clear Opening Width = 32.56 Clear Opening Height = 32.95 Clear Opening Area = 7.45 Insect Screen 1 Part Number = 0833434 SKU = 290067 Vendor Name = S/0 ANDERSEN LOGISTICS Vendor Number = 60509030 Customer Service = (888) 888-7020 Catalog Version Date = 03/01/2018 age 2 of 3 Date Printed: 4/9/2018 12:10 PM Andersen, WINDOWS• DOORS Art erican Cri Ismail bAnrMisrn .,;` 300-1 400 Series Double -Hung Equal Sash , AA , 44 x 71.5 , / Sandtone -Sandtone Pine Unfinished 300-2 Insect Screen 1: 400 Series Double -Hung TW 44 x 71.5 Full Screen Aluminum Sandtone Version:03/01/2018 00 Series Double -Hung lverall Rough Opening = 44 1/2" x 71 1/2" )verall Unit = 44" x 71 1/2" lstallation Zip Code = 55109 I.S. ENERGY STAR® Climate Zone = Northern earch by Unit Code = No tandard Width = Custom tandard Height = Custom rame Width = 44 rame Height = 71 1/2 'enting / Handing = AA xterior Color = Sandtone xterior Sash/Panel Color = Sandtone iterior Species = Pine iterlor Finish Color = Unfinished amb Liner Color = Gray ilass Construction Type = Dual Pane ilass Option = Low-E4 ligh Altitude Breather Tubes = No $730.33 $620.71 $54,84 $46.61 Begin Line 300 Descriptions Standard Width = Custom Standard Height = Custom Frame Width = 44 Frame Height = 71 1/2 1 1 ($109.62) $620.71 ($8.23) $46.61 ---- Line 300-1---- Glass Strength = Standard Specialty Glass = None Gas Fill = Argon Unit 1 Lower Glass: None Unit 1 Upper Glass: Finelight Grilles -Between -the - Glass Unit 1 Upper Glass: Specified Equal Light Unit 1 Upper Glass: Grille Pattern = Specified Equal Light Unit 1 Upper Glass: Grille Bar Width = 3/4" Unit 1 Upper Glass: Exterior Grille Color = Sandtone Unit 1 Upper Glass: Interior Grille Color = Sandtone Unit 1 Upper Glass: 4W2H DP/PG Upgrade = No Hardware = None Lock Hardware Style =Traditional Number of Sash Locks = 1 Lock Hardware Color/Finish = Stone (Factory Applied) Window Opening Control Device = No Security Sensor Type = None Insect Screen Type = Full Screen ---- Line 300-2 Description is the same as line 300-1-- End Line 300 Descriptions Insect Screen Material = Aluminum Insect Screen Color = Sandtone Exterior Trim Style = None Extension Jamb Type = None Stool Option = None Re -Order Item = No Room Location = None Unit U-Factor = 0.3 Unit Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) = 0.28 U.S. ENERGY STAR Certified = No Clear Opening Width = 40.296 Clear Opening Height = 31.11 Clear Opening Area = 8.706 SKU = 289185 Vendor Name = S/O ANDERSEN LOGISTICS Vendor Number = 60509030 Customer Service = (888) 888-7020 Catalog Version Date = 03/01/2018 age 3 of 3 Date Printed: 4/9/2018 12:10 PM fflwater !i F 6'.RTFV P14 T; E 91F MINNFSOITA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 18, 2018 CASE NO.: 2018-08 APPLICANT: Mark & Karen Peterson, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for a new residence to be located in the Neighborhood Conservation District at 107 Everett Street South, in the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD). ZONING: RB-Two Family COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a permit to construct a two and a half story, single- family residence at 107 Everett Street South, a vacant lot in the Neighborhood Conservation District. The house will have a single, front facing, asymmetrical 12/12 pitch, gable roof on both the house and its attached, but recessed garage. The house will be sided with a combination of dark gray, cement fiber, board and baton and lap siding in cedar or IPE natural wood. This will be carried on all four sides of the home. The roof areas will have composite shingles with metal accents over porches, walkways and protruding additions. Windows will be a gunmetal gray. The house will have an open but covered front stoop and porch with a rear yard screened porch. It appears that there will be little exposed foundation but what is exposed to proposed to remain as poured concrete walls. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GUIDELINES AND ANALYSIS All infill homes in the NCD are required to follow the NCD design guidelines. These design guidelines recommend the following: Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new A two and a half story home is proposed. The front elevation of building should be the home is (approximately) 15' lower in grade than the front of compatible with neighboring those homes to the North. The half story look out will be structures. situated to the east, giving the appearance of a two-story residence from the roadway. Respect the existing rhythm This property is "tucked away" from most other residences of the streetscape. along Everett and Myrtle. Given this, there is not a prevailing Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. street pattern in this location. The applicants are proposing setbacks consistent with the zoning code regulations and existing homes. The attached garage will be set back from the face of the house. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. Aside from the asymmetrical design, the proposed gable roof is consistent with the neighboring houses. Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. The height of the building is consistent with the zoning code regulations, as well as the design standards for the district and adjacent property. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. The lot largely flat but gradually slopes to an area of steep slopes on the property. The property owner is proposing to excavate the property to have a lookout design on the east and south. There is one significant tree on the property proposed to be retained. There is concern from the adjacent neighbor of the future health of the tree, if its roots are damaged in the construction of the driveway. Additionally, there was a mature black walnut that was recently removed from the top of the steep slope. This was legal and no permitted was needed. Removal was due to way the tree was leaning onto the land. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. Respect the site's natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and retaining walls. Retaining walls are proposed on the front of the home. This is to accommodate for the lookout design proposed. If these walls are greater than 18" in height, they would be considered structures and would be required have variances prior to construction. While the site does slope to the east and south, the property owners are proposed significant cut and retaining walls for the construction of this home. Building Site Locate garage and driveway While the garage will face Everett Street South, it will be to respect existing street and situated at greater than 30' from the property line and neighborhood patterns. (approximately) 20' behind the front line of the home, minimizing its impact on the neighborhood. New driveways may only be 16' at the property line and curb. Therefore, the applicant will need to reduce the driveway width, which will help reduce its impact in this area. Minimize garage impact on While the garage will be visible from the street, it will be set 107 Everett Street South HPC Case No. 2018-09 Page 2 of 5 new structure massing and street front. back and located on the side of the home. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. The proposal appears to meet all lot coverage requirements for this zoning district and conforms with the size and mass of the single residence located at the bottom of South Everett Street. Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. An open front stoop is proposed. However, no porch is proposed. That said, this is not a traditional neighborhood streetscape. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. The attached garage is proposed to have the same materials and details as the primary structure. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. This guideline has been met. Architectural Detail The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. The proposed design is more modern but does not detract from the neighborhood. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. The proposed design is similar in scale and context to neighboring residences though, with the lookout to the south, the structure's two and a half story appearance on this facade will be larger than any adjacent property. That said, the property's adjacent southern neighbors are located on top of the bluff, looking down onto this property. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. The design is consistent with the architectural style. The applicant's use a variety of materials and window styles to help break up the facades of the structure and blend with the natural setting. As there are minimal structures in the immediate vicinity of the proposed residence, there is little relationship to analyze. The neighbor, directly to the north, will be the most impacted. The asymmetrical roofline creates a large roof mass along the northern property line. Use masonry and stone authentically. No masonry or stone is proposed. PUBLIC COMMENT One comment has been received to date. Laura Beale (617 Myrtle) has, as noted, expressed concern for the tree located adjacent to the subject property's western property line, approximately 4' from the proposed driveway. 107 Everett Street South HPC Case No. 2018-09 Page 3 of 5 With the reduction of the driveway to 16' in width at the curb and property line, construction activities should not be located on the tree's root zone, thereby reducing the potentially negative impact to this tree. RECOMMENDATION The HPC has alternatives to the proposal: A. Approve. If the proposed infill design review meets the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2018-08, with or without conditions. Staff would recommend the following minimum conditions of approval. 1. With the exception of the conditions outlined herein, plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department. 2. All 18" or taller retaining walls located in the Front Yard Setback area shall require a variance prior to construction. 3. The driveway width shall be reduced to 16' at the curb and property line. 4. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 5. A landscaping plan, to include tree replacement, shall be submitted at the time of the building permit. All significant trees removed shall be replaced. 6. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled to the next meeting. FINDINGS As noted in the Stillwater Conservation District Design Guideline Manual, The guidelines are intended to serve as a framework to guide the design process, while allowing for individuality and creativity in architectural design. While this (more) modern design would not fit within most traditional neighborhoods in Stillwater, it does not detract from the character of this dead- end street. With certain conditions, the project substantially conforms to the adopted guidelines and, therefore, staff recommends approval of HPC Case No. 2018-08 with conditions. ATTACHMENTS 107 Everett Street South HPC Case No. 2018-09 Page 4 of 5 Site Location Map Applicant Narrative Design Review Checklist Site Photographs Certificate of Survey Site Plan Elevations Window Detail Floor Plans 107 Everett Street South HPC Case No. 2018-09 Page 5 of 5 H ',,,, ' _• < 209 , H 207 - Ct 0 z 1 I (water , , - - -, ,.. t—.. , --.1..- 16.-- WEST RICE STREET w 2 r t_ztakiii > UJ ICE ST "0 _...4i• n9t. it' .....c....... -' . ;-- • ! ,e. H The Birthplace of Minnesota I ' — \ WTE 1 4 r _ z,. 1 ,s4 „ .., ...,, , „... ,, ,,.., / 1,. , . .. , , WEST . ' + ' N\N( Site Location Map ... , - , _:, ; • ' . —r I* CO 107 Everett Street South Cn H MI 2 Cn H u) _1 w ILI 2 —I Et 0 115 230 460 Feet Et F— f ', 7 ILI Ct I: < < General Site Location ' ' , i r 1 , 2 , . ... /, ......•......... i 8 1 , ' AIi, L .-`41' 1'"'' '-li4t,.:• 1 72. 8 7• 2. 4 • - 410 • o..' 02 8 i 7, l6. 2,J -,-„t.. 1kt,'' / WEST , . ° •kte— . r1'el'11l a1-c1-.,maaI i111 ,0 ..•/ am/4i ,, ..'.-'--r—' '. . •• t. i , ,•,,,'• i ' 0 i* N. ., .6 N. • 1,1, ,-.,......... . , • ..... I., — ' t - -, - ."4:•is A A 1 .. ,•,,,, ;-,,,•.,..\ •,,. = -.,,i, -- , gi 11 r1 . .. Z 4 . --- 7 , 1 ' .• , " . , * # 4. ' ,.... 4. Ail . I: exlir- •—• , • I .011.: fir ...,,, ri, ".._ All,,, =11-r ;,—••—.1. .tir• • ••-• , rt —4 r Supplement to Design Review Application Mark & Karen Vidlock Petersen 107 Everett Street, South, Stillwater Introduction Mark & Karen Vidlock Petersen propose to construct a two story home with attached two car garage on a lot having 12,278 square feet, with 10,998 sf being above steep slopes as defined by City code. Site The subject vacant lot is the second lot south of Myrtle Street on Everett Street, which is a short cul-de- sac at this location. The lot is relatively flat sloping from the NW (highest) to the SE (lowest). There is a steep slope running along the south side and part of the east side of the lot. Adjacent to the south is City -owned ravine with no structures. The homes beyond the ravine (on Olive St) are much higher than the subject lot. The site will need to be raised somewhat on the north side to the elevation of the garage floor. Grading, cut and fill will be minimal on the south side of the lot. Design Considerations and Exterior Finishes In designing the home, particular attention was given to making the house and attached garage blend in with the character of other Stillwater homes, while still projecting a modern, new house aesthetic. The two story portion of the house is only 18 feet wide. At ground level, the house has north and south "wings" that have 4/12 roofs to mimic porches common in the City. While attached, the garage has the appearance from some angles of being detached, because the roof of the north "wing" is kept low, which gives the appearance of separation between the house and garage similar to a detached garage. The overall height is also kept lower by dropping the wall height on north sides of both the house (5') and garage (8') below customary heights and employing parallel trusses with a 12/12 pitch to provide internal volume. The house will be sided in a combination of dark gray board and baton (main house and garage) and lap siding in either cedar or IPE natural wood. Decks will be either IPE or a TREX equivalent. Deck railings will be steel with pulled cable. The board and baton areas will be cement fiber board. No vinyl or similar products will used. Design details are carried through all four sides of the home. Roofing materials for the lower sloped portions will be either standing seam or click seam steel in a medium gray. Steeper pitched area will be a similar but darker colored asphalt shingle. Again, this gives the lower sloped area a feeling of being a porch, even where over conditioned space. Windows with be Marvin in gunmetal (dark gray). Window detail is provided in the packet of materials submitted. Except for lighting on either side of the garage, all exterior lighting will be in soffits. The two lights on either side of the garage door will be downlit. The driveway will be asphalt. Impervious Calculations The subject property is Zone RB, which allows for up to 25% of the area above the slope to be structure and an addition 25% to be other impervious surface. The area above the slope is 10,998 sf, and thus the resulting limits are 2749.5 sf. The structure (including house and attached garage) is approximately 2310 sf. The propose driveway is approximately 1330 sf. Other impervious (patios, sidewalks, stairs, retaining) will be less than 500 sf. Setbacks The proposed home is set back 20 feet from the front lot line. The garage is set back more than 10 feet from the front of the house as required by code. Code also requires all structures to be set back at least 30 feet from the slope on the south and east sides of the lot. As proposed, the screen porch and SE deck stairs encroach inches into this setback. There is an existing variance for the lot that allows a detached garage to be within 15 feet of the steep slope, but this variance is not being relied upon. Landscaping and Trees Several dead and undesirable trees have already been removed along the east boundary of the lot. A significant black walnut will be removed on the south lot line because it leans precariously toward the proposed home. Six to eight trees, a combination of pine, birch and maple, will be planted behind the garage on the east side of the lot. Further, four to five maples and seedless ash will be added along the ridgeline and in the front yard. River rock will be used on the north side of the garage and under all deck areas. The driveway will be the width of the garage door from the street and be asphalt. Foundation plantings will be in cedar mulched beds with a combination of shrubs and perennials. It is currently planned that retaining walls will be poured at the time the foundation is poured. Because of the design of the walls, they will be only minimally viewable from the street. While the guidelines encourage natural materials, we believe the poured walls will be aesthetically more in line with the design of the home. Design Review Application and Checklist This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form Contact: Stillwater City Planning Office 651-430-8821 City Hall 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 w w w. ci. stillwater. mn. us Project Address: ) 07 cirdt rl r' Applicant name address, telephone: ir7 :lC t K42en/ f li r t 2r6"- tl 2T TO A ,v i2 €)> 2'Vi 4,4 VN' 1. Neighborhood Architectural Styles: k Vernacular r P h V ❑ Italianate Queen Anne L- ❑ Gothic o Greek Revival ❑ Second Empire o American Foursquare a Stick ?i, d s /` a Other: Cos rev- h I e r f� 2. Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback: (Guidelines #1, #2, #3) Prevailing setback on block (est.) 4 / 1 ri- Average setback on block (est.) Proposed new house setback - U 44 3. Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1, 1-1/2, or 2 stories high? (Guidelines #4, #5) Stories 1 1-1/2 House on right /vh ❑ ❑ House on left ❑ ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ ❑ Prevailing opposite block ❑ ❑ Proposed new house ❑ ❑ $� witti �O N 4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your neighborhood: (Guideline #13) Front Porch None House on right n���} ❑ ❑ House on left �i ❑ House to rear ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailing opposite block k ❑ Proposed new house !a' ❑ Notes: 5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) Front Rear Side House on right House on left House to rear Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ Garage Garage Garage ev ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) 1 stall 2 stall 3 stall Garage Garage Garage N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �C ❑ ❑ ❑ House on right House on left House to rear Prevailing on block Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ '4 ❑ 7. Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house? (Guideline #14) Uts 8. If the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighborhood and streetscape? : ("An-13 .L I 73/.�1 CL/ 047 7 , r— l- vt- 4( fie. 4- p f/ 4/ €Cf4t i4ocsE Stillwater Conservation District (p 1 of 2) Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist 9. Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property? (Guidelines #6, #7, #8) X Structure sited parallel to slope 'y(' Building deigned to reduce cut and fill (minimized retaining walls) 1zt Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes: 10. Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? (Guideline #9) ❑ Types of trees ❑ Heights ❑ Trunk diam. Notes: ,<.e✓t✓o d Qwc e J s EP'o or Le) Aoot._ w,7/ /a-e J Good Neighbor Considerations 1. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunlight in adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) �/ House to right: House to left: _ 62 _ House to rear: 4/0 Notes: How will you mitigate any negative sunlight impacts on neighbors? 14 Locate structure on lot to minimize impact \u Adjust building height, or portions of building, to minimize impact ❑ Other: 2. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines #22, #23) House to right: House to left: 0 House to rear: /' U Notes: How will you mitigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? ❑ Offset/locate windows to reduce impact u Use obscure glass in window Locate balconies to minimize impact. X Use landscaping elements for screening ❑ Other: 3. How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors?(Guideline #25) 196 Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property ❑ Other: To be included with this Application and Checklist: ❑ Site Plan: include location of proposed building(s) on property, lot area; indicate impervious surface, property lines, street/ sidewalk location and approximate location of adjacent structures. Indicate proposed outdoor deck/patio and landscaping features. ❑ B wilding Plan: dimensions, first floor area square footage. ❑ ng Elevations: indicate building height, windows, materials, and color on all elevations. Indicate proposed exterior lighting. ❑ Photographs of site and streetscape. ❑ Regular Planning Department Development Application Form Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines (p 2 of 2) Photos of Adjacent Properties 110 Everett St S — Across Everett from applicant Built year unknown (circa 1880) Extensive remodel in 2004-2006 3 car detached garage (behind house) added 2006 703 Myrtle St W — SW corner of Everett & Myrtle — across and N of applicant Built 1955 Walkout rambler with two rental units 617 Myrtle St W — SE corner of Everett & Myrtle —adjacent to S of applicant Built 1868 2 car detached garage (not shown) added to rear in 2004 114 Martha St S — Adjacent to applicant to east (rear) Built 1875 Detached 2 car garage with lean-to car port. Site and Streetscape Photos CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: MARK PETERSON LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AS SHOWN ON STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY AS ISSUED BY ITS AGENT, LAND TITLE, INC. TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 544938, DATED SEPTEMBER 5TH, 2016) Lot Six (6), except the North 3.0 feet thereof and Lot Eight (8), Block Eleven (11), Thompson, Parker, and Mower's Second Addition, Washington County, Minnesota. Together with a utility easement over, under, and across the East 20.00 feet of Lots 2 and 4 and the North 3.00 feet of Lot 6, all in Block 1 1 . Abstract Property AREA: TOTAL LOT AREA 12,278 SQ.FT. AREA TO TOP OF STEEP SLOPE = 10,998 SQ.FT. LEGEND 8g1 884. S8 0�8 N' 0 WALL CO 63 00 ai b.- 0,: PP' 59 I , 0" / 885.48' 6S 03 ' CS' X885.6 33, Q5 766 X 882.7 882 881. SS\ , pif 879.7 0 X880.0\6 NORTH 20 CERTIFICATION X 880.6 40 X 881.7 X 881.4 • ND 1/2" IRON PIPE MA•. : RLS 5718 X 879.5 PROJECT LOCATION: 107 EVERETT ST. S. STILLWATER, MN PROJECT NO. MPL1 6005 03 4) X 885.9E 88. 63 U m Iw I-OUND 1/2" 24"-- RON PIPE MARKED RLS X877.3 25718 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA. DANIEL L. THURMES X 877.7 874.8 AN WEST MYRTLE STREET UTILITIES SHOWN PER PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER, VERIFY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. 26 53 F- Q z SIDEWALK APPROX. ELEv - =865.3 3' UTILITY EASEMENT AS 126.00 PLAT RECITED IN LEGAL V DESCRIPTION. S89°52'21"E `I`� 5.2126.00 i`, 4 x 5" ! 'ARD SETBACK LEGEND: X 882.6 X 880.7 TO 25% SLOPE X 678.7 876.5 ELINE SETBACK PER CASE NO. 2012-26, I � DEP AS DOC. NO. 3N1043g8 / 1/ TOP OF 24% SLOPE - 8/6, / X 876.2 - 7-853.6 126.01 N89°51'21"W 126.00 PLAT SYMBOLS • X=G131.6 30� DESCRIPTION PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE DENOTES IRON MON. FOUND EXISTING ELEVATIONS EXISTING CONTOURS X 872.2 20' FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS 25718 - 881.2 X 880.2X X 875.1 \\ 79.1 1 X 875.4 876.4 Suite #1 6750 Stillwater Blvd. N. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dan@ cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE License No. 25718 Date: 11-3-16 LAND SURVEYING, INC. XX885 6 X 883.0 X881.7 886.0' .MIN1i i i 875.33' X 24" X877.7 �� X 877.3 c' GARAGE SLAB: 884.67 CO DOOR X 876.2 X: .6 O/_.6 n 4 X 882.6 X 880.7 X 878.7 X 876.6 881.2X / X876,0� co 107 Everett St S Stillwater Minnesota michael huber architects 03.15.18 West Elevation 107 Everett St S Stillwater Minnesota michael huber architects 03.15.18 South Elevation East Elevation 107 Everett St S Stillwater Minnesota michael huber architects 03.15.18 North Elevation Typical Window Trim OP 1 Alt 107 Everett St S Stillwater Minnesota michael huber architects 03.15.18 1x2 Trim Jambs & Head -Paint to match siding Marvin Window - Finish: GunMetal 1x4 Trim Sill - Paint to match siding 7/z. r c t 11 [II 111 II LOWED LEVEL FLOO DLA\ 1 j C3 NORTH CA". Petersen Residence New Construction 107 Everett St. South Stillwater, MN 55082 ARCHITECT: michael, 351 Highview Road Hudson WI 54016 651 . 442 . 3771 huber architects STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Bunkers & Associates 6687 Forest Street Farmington, MN 55024 651.366.2853 Copyright 2018, michael huber architects All Rights Reserved. Copying, reproduction or distribution prohibited without express written permission. Project No.: Date: Revisions: 3/6/18 Title LOWER LEVEL PLAN Sheet Number Al 2 I— L ../ I o 1 1 rn 0 7 IJ 111 111 1I Ir J n n n n n L V AI \ LEVEL ELOO PLA\ L C 1 —I — NORTH C.. Petersen Residence New Construction 107 Everett St. South Stillwater, MN 55082 ARCHITECT: michael 351 Highview Road Hudson WI 54016 651 . 442 . 3771 huber architects STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Bunkers & Associates 6687 Forest Street Farmington, MN 55024 651.366.2853 Copyright 2018, michael huber architects All Rights Reserved. Copying, reproduction or distribution prohibited without express written permission. Project No.: Date: Revisions: 3/6/18 Title MAIN LEVEL PLAN Sheet Number A2 1 /4"=1'-0" r F L 1 11 11 11--11 11--11 1 t r -w 11 I L 0 17 1 UPPED LEVEL ELOO PLA\ /4"=1'-0" --J J NORTH ("A". Petersen Residence New Construction 107 Everett St. South Stillwater, MN 55082 ARCHITECT: michael 351 Highview Road Hudson WI 54016 651 . 442 . 3771 huber architects STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Bunkers & Associates 6687 Forest Street Farmington, MN 55024 651.366.2853 Copyright 2018, michael huber architects All Rights Reserved. Copying, reproduction or distribution prohibited without express written permission. Project No.: Date: Revisions: 3/6/18 Title UPPER LEVEL PLAN Sheet Number A3