Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-12-18 JPC MINMinutes of the Joint Powers Committee December 18, 1980 MEMBERS PRESENT Ann Bodlovick, Harry Peterson, Bill Lundquist, Bill Easton. STAFF PRESENT Dan Koehler, Doug Swenson, Michele Stanoch. OTHERS PRESENT Neal Skinner, Jim Torseth, Leonard Feely, Elizabeth Feely, Joseph Nolde. CALL TO ORDER Bodlovick, who chaired the committee, called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Peterson made a motion to approve the November 19, 1980 minutes as presented. Easton seconded. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Swager PUD Concept �aroval: Bodlovick stated that the Stillwater City Council had reviewed the draft approval (attached) and ordered their Joint Powers Committee members not to consider approval until two criteria were met. These criteria were 1) that Swagers petition for annexation to the city; 2) that Swagers pay the engineering and traffic study fees. The City Council was also concerned with the high density of the proposed Swager development. Bodlovick asked the approximate area Swagers proposed to develop. Koehler stated that it was two to three acres. Koehler asked if Swagers were present at the Stillwater Council meeting. Bodlovick stated that they were not. Koehler informed the Joint Powers Committee that Gary Swager did not agree to grant an extension to the committee to consider his proposal. Peterson moved to deny concept approval based on the expressed objection by the Stillwater City Council. Lundquist stated that he was unsure of seconding the motion since Swagers would not be able to reapply for six months. Easton asked if the city was opposed to conditional approval. Bodlovick stated the City Council was opposed to any conditional approval. Peterson moved to amend the motion to wave the prohibition of reapplication in six months. Easton seconded the amendment. Bodlovick asked for comments from the audience before the motion was voted on. Joseph Nolde requested that the density of the parcel be considered. Joint Powers Committee Minutes Page Two December 18, 1980 Lundquist questioned the city's requirements for annexation. Bodlovick replied that annexation would be consistent with previous development in the area. Bodlovick asked if there were any more questions from the audience. There were none. Bodlovick asked for a vote on the motion. Four voted aye. None opposed. Motion carried unanimously. Peterson asked whether the rezoning proposal was to be discussed. Koehler stated the rezoning proposal was not on the agenda but would be scheduled for the January meeting. Easton recommended that the rezoning proposal not be discussed unless Cathy Buck was present. Bodlovick asked whether there was any more business to be taken care of. Nothing more was brought up. ADJOURNMENT Bodlovick made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Easton seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. X f9= ly submitted, h er Planner