Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017-11-07 CC Agenda Packet
REGULAR MEETING RECESSED MEETING 216 4d, Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us REVISED AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 2017 4:30 P.M. AGENDA 4:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Washington County - Upcoming Browns Creek Trail connection and 5 year County CIP Update !' ! • : ' . (Rescheduled to 12-5-2017 4:30 meeting) 3. Possible approval of proposal for Architectural Services for St. Croix Valley Recreation Center IV. STAFF REPORTS 4. Police Chief 5. Fire Chief - update on delivery of new Fire Engine 6. City Clerk 7. Community Development Dir. 8. Public Works Dir. 9. Finance Director 10. City Attorney 11. City Administrator 7:00 P.M. AGENDA V. CALL TO ORDER VI. ROLL CALL VII. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE VIII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 12. Possible approval of October 17, 2017 regular meeting minutes IX. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS 13. Badge Presentation/Oaths to Police Officers - Nolan Cornell, Laura McBroom, James Carter 14. Community Solar Gardens in Stillwater area - David Haeg, SolarMatch 15. Introduction of Major Eric Lewanski, Stillwater National Guard Readiness Center X. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. XI. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) all items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a council member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 16. Resolution 2017-213, Directing the Payment of Bills 17. Resolution 2017-214, approving Minnesota Premises Permit for Lawful Gambling for Eagles 94, located at 14200 60th St. N, Stillwater, Minnesota 18. Possible approval of Public Works Salt Shed Outside Storage (Shed Roof) 19. Resolution 2017-215, renewal of License for Stillwater Trolley 20. Resolution 2017-216, final acceptance of 2015 Street Projects 21. Resolution 2017-217, authorizing the preparation for and conducting of a sale of real estate - The Crosby Hotel XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OUT OF RESPECT FOR OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 10 MINUTES OR LESS. 22. Case No. 2017-43. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request by Happy Bridge, LLC, property owner and Scott and Luke Sodergren, applicant, for the Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, to allow a cigar shop and sampling room in the Central Business District. Complete property and legal description available upon request. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 29, 2017. (Ordinance - 1St Reading - Roll Call) 23. Case No. 2017-48. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request by Anne Stanfield of Ecumen and Our Savior's Lutheran Church for the Consideration of a Final PUD, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit for a senior living housing facility. The facility would be located at 114 Brick Street, and 1616 Olive St. PID 2903020420042 and 2903020420001. (Resolution - Roll Call) XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 24. Possible approval of Marine Circle Lift Station Project Bid Award, Project 2017-07 (2 Resolutions - Roll Call) XIV. NEW BUSINESS 25. Possible approval of Resolution Authorizing the call of the Outstanding General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C (Resolution - Roll Call) 26.Approval of construction staging ar a plan for the Lift Bridgc Convcrsion Projcct (To be rescheduled for future meeting) XV. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) XVI. COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS XVII. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS XVIII. STAFF REPORTS (CONTINUED) XIX. ADJOURNMENT r � � flu{IIIfoQll611ulllllll� �% ; �: I� N r r r "j r� Solar Electricity Without Panels on Your Roof Reduce Your Xcei Energy® Bili Learn More & Explore Offers From Different Providers So, la,rMatch MySolarMatch.com i SolarMatch Makes it Simple SolarMatch is a free service to help you learn about community solar and shop for a subscription. You can compare your options and get connected with a provider in minutes. UV Trusted Resource We provide honest information, reviewed by state agencies and non-profits. Learn Before you Decide Learn how community solar works and see if you're a good fit. We're available to answer your questions. Compare Available Offers SolarMatch provides a simple and thorough explanation of offers available in your area, including: • Detailed information about each solar garden provider • An estimate of how much each offer can help you save • Detailed description of how you can exit the subscription X X X rY, r y � M ,d � a ......_�._.......,..._ ... .� .............._� � _ Ce n rn kC Gomm 'SNI_ N NNEIM ONE== ONES= Learn More & Explore Offers MySolarMatch . com RESOLUTION 2017-213 DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF BILLS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the bills set forth and itemized on Exhibit "A" totaling $1,732,215.63 are hereby approved for payment, and that checks be issued for the payment thereof. The complete list of bills (Exhibit "A") is on file in the office of the City Clerk and may be inspected upon request. Adopted by the Council this 7th day of November, 2017. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: J. Thomas McCarty, Acting City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Page 1 LIST OF BILLS 3D Specialties Inc. Ace Hardware Action Rental Inc. Advance Auto Parts Advanced Sportswear Amano McGann Inc American Med Supply Animal Humane Society Aspen Mills Atomic Architectural Sheet Metal AutoNation Becker Fire Safety Services LLC BHE Community Solar Board of Water Commissioner Bolton and Menk Inc. Braun Intertec Corporation Breth-Zenzen Fire Protection LLC Brines Market CDW Government Inc. City of Brooklyn Center Cole Papers Collagiate Concepts Comcast Core & Main CoStar Realty Information Inc County Materials Corporation Coverall of the Twin Cities Custom Fire Apparatus Davids Hydro Vac Dell Marketing L.P. Diamond Vogel Paints ECM Publishers Ecolab Pest Emergency Automotive Emergency Medical Products Environmental Equipment & Services Erenberg Sarah Ess Brothers & Sons Inc. Fastenal Company FedEx Felsch Chris Fire Safety U.S.A. FleetPride Flexible Pipe Tool Co. Forestry Suppliers Inc. Supplies Supplies Mixing trailer and concrete Equipment repair supplies Uniform Metric multi space meters Battery Pound charges Uniforms Install new flashing Vehicle repair Extinguisher Solar Garden WAC Charges Marine cir Ift station Police project 2017 sprinkler inspection Funeral food Computer equipment Tech day seminar Janitorial Supplies Stainless bottles with black imprint TV Internet & Voice Sewer repairs Property professional Catch basin & riser Commercial cleaning services New engine Hydro vac Iift station Computer equipment Paint Publications Ant program Vehicle repairs Heartstart pads Sweeper Reimburse for mileage Insurance claims Equipment repair supplies Shipping Reimburse for fuel Supplies Equipment repair supplies Repair video cable Supplies 2,159.91 122.12 225.46 304.18 168.00 9,921.65 454.02 44.00 1,863.60 12,840.00 435.48 182.95 5,671.15 4,158.00 6,840.00 1,285.75 425.00 83.74 2,861.96 68.00 1,683.66 2,272.55 359.41 705.46 376.83 471.92 540.00 2,973.12 1,360.00 162.83 240.84 200.21 446.65 308.75 173.25 146,907.25 36.38 8,630.00 369.11 9.99 23.50 90.00 322.67 533.10 265.07 EXHIBIT "A"TORESOLUTION #2@17-213 G & K Services Galls LLC Goodyear Commercial Tire HagstronnBuilders Hardrives Inc. Henricksen PSG Heritage Printing Inc. Hi|di|nc Holiday Companies Home Energy Center HTS Fitness LLC I State Truck Center J.P. Cooke Co. iohnson Controls Inc. Joshs Paint Repair Junker Brad Lake Country Door LLC Lametti and Sons Inc Lano Equipment Loffler Companies MacQueen Equipment Inc. Madden Galanter Hansen LLP Mansfield 011 Company Marshall Electric Company McCarty John Thomas Melstrom Jeff Menards Metropolitan Council MetropoHtan Mechanical Contractors Mid-America Business Systems Miller Excavating MN State Fire Department Assoc NAPA Auto Parts National Reprographics LLC NPELRA Nuss Truck & Equipment Office Depot OnSite Sanitation O'Reilly Auto Parts Progressive Microtechnology Inc Regency Office Products LLC RJ Mechanical Robole Donna Roofing St Restoration Services Safe Assure Consultants 5afeFast/no Scott County Treasurer Mats Flashlight Tires Refund of SAC & WAC Street P'ect Police project Utility billing forms Actuarial valuation Vehicle washes Refund of Permit Fee Refund ofVariance Truck chassis Dog tags Police project Paint truck Reimburse for Halloween glow necklaces Repair door Remove buildings 1250 5 Main St Seeder Professional services & equipment Jetter/Vactor Labor Relations Services Fuel Lowell park Reimburse for conf expenses Reimburse for work boots Supplies Monthly SAC Maintenance agreement Mold Abatement 2016 Street Project 2018 Membership Equipment repair supplies Scan building dept plans 2018 Membership Equipment repair supplies Office supplies Portable restroom rental Equipment repair supplies Supplies Supplies Repair Reimburse for mileage - conferences Refund of Permit Fees Safety training Safety equipment Training Page 2 44.48 53.92 930.28 3,485.00 524,388.16 43,212.19 506.50 850.00 320.00 59.60 225.00 106,567.00 80.50 8,803.00 1,549.50 149.90 835.00 14,600.00 6,014.85 6,272.89 270,375.00 77.50 5,546.80 1,402.00 648.52 160.00 1,118.41 19,681.20 2,162.00 3,894.00 68,010.69 423.00 24.13 1,524.60 200.00 132.26 790.54 432.00 459.10 154.34 25.02 500.00 73.83 974.00 4,057.56 1,026.58 1,400.00 EXHIBIT "A"TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Siegfried Construction Company George SiteOne Landscape Supply Springsted St. Croix Boat and Packet Co. Stiliwater Collision and Mechanical Stiliwater Motor Company Streichers Stripe A Lot Doug McLean dba Sun Control of MN T.A. Schifsky and Sons T8E||nc/Crystee|Manufacturing Tri-State Bobcat Truck Utilities Inc. Turnblad Bill United Rentals North America USAb|eLife Verizon Wireless Veterans Memorial Washington Conservation Distr Washington County Road & Bridge Water Works Irrigation LLC Wenck Construction Were Bruce White Bear Tire & Auto Inc. Wold Architects and Engineers WSB & Associates Inc. Wulfing David Young Dan Ziebart of MN REC CENTER 1ST Line/Leewes Ventures LLC 4Front LLC AT&T Mobility BDI Gopher Bearing Corval Constructors Holiday Credit Office ISD 4*834 Stiliwater Area Schools Menards Nardini Fire Equipment Pepsi Beverages Company R&R Specialties Inc. Riedell Shoes Inc. St. Croix Boat and Packet Co. Stillwater Turf & Power LLC Twin Cities Dots & Pop City Hall stair repair Supplies Continuing disclosure services Ramp cleaning Repairs Vehicle service Uniforms & supplies Police parking lot Sun control window film Aggregate Equipment repair supplies BiIIy Goat F18 Wheeled Biower Tech drawer unit Reimburse for car rental Cable ramps Term Life Insurance Wireless service Super VaIu Parking 2nd & 3rd qtrs Shared Educator Traffic signal maint Trail improvements Police project Refund of UB overpayment Tires Police project Stormwater mgmt plan update Reimburse for K9 boarding Reimburse for fuel Rust protection on new vehicle Snacks for cancessions Graphics Cell phone Equipment repair Equipment repair supplies Fuel Community Ed Ad Supplies Equipment repairs Beverages for concessions Equipment repair supplies Skates Arena billing Repair supplies Concession supplies Page 3 20,772.90 45.30 3,400.00 810.00 16,414.43 95.68 1,002.86 350.00 275.00 1,085.76 70.72 1,950.00 1,800.00 133.89 480.00 444.00 2,865.35 8,694.00 625.00 98.16 1,750.00 31,554.36 294.95 916.97 922.50 4,004.50 100.00 22.00 627.50 402.70 250.00 147.90 815.41 355.00 6.61 700.00 349.12 102.25 283.12 77.65 217.59 43,129.26 192.37 949.23 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Washington County Dept of PubIic CREDIT CARDS Amazon.com Daokuroundcheokszonn Hamline University Graduate Log Me In MN Fire Srv. Cert. Board Network Technologies University of MN CCE Registration Walmart.com LIBRARY Baker and Taylor Brodart Co Culligan ofStillwater Demco Inc. ECM Publishers Gaytord Bros Inc. Master Mechanical Inc. MEI Total Elevator Solutions K4enards Midwest Tape Minitex Office of MN IT Services Petrie Angela Quill Corporation Security Response Services Inc Toshiba Business Solutions Troend|eMark ] Value Line Publishing Inc. Viking Auto Sprinkler Co. Xce|EnerAy LIBRARY CREDIT CARDS Amazon Superior Hiking Trail Assc OCTOBER MANUALS Century Link Comcast G&K Services Post Board Food & Beverage License Supplies Background checks Insights & Trends Seminar Sewer telemetry LogMetn MFSCBBulk Recertification IP video extenders Project mgmt class Equipment Materials Materials Water Processing Supplies Publishing - Board Posting Processing Supplies Preventative Maintenance Elevator Repairs Janitorial Supplies Materials Materials Phone - September Staff Reimbursement General Supplies Security Monitoring Maintenance Contract Relocation Expense Stipend Materials Annual Maintenance Energy Materials Materials Telephone TV Internet & Voice Uniforms & Mats Officer License Page 4 617.00 477.29 73.90 50.00 267.80 100.00 507.74 470.00 93.84 2,571.54 3,516.70 14.55 41.10 28.14 73.39 1,126.50 264.00 57.28 3,232.79 798.00 375.61 460.57 543.72 168.12 75.13 5,000.00 470.00 560.00 4,477.01 32.11 42,86 87.11 383.33 553.36 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Page 5 Postmaster Xcel Energy ADDENDUM Browns Creek Watershed District Century Link Coverall of the Twin Cities Gerard Joy Goodyear Commercial Tire League of MN Cities Magnuson David Metropolitan Council MN Dept of Public Safety Roberts Company Inc. Washington County License Center Xcel Energy Adopted by the City Council this 7th Day of November, 2017 Newsletter & UB billing Energy Paving Browns Creek Parking Telephone & alarms Commercial Cleaning Services Parking ramp refund Tires Workers Comp Claim Professional Services Wastewater Charge 18 Fire License Plates Name bars Spartan/Custom Fire Registration Energy 4,381.93 21,157.85 18,546.17 322.66 1,772.00 10.00 605.02 1,943.81 19,449.16 142,290.96 54.00 91.80 21.75 20,305.62 TOTAL 1,732,215.63 Abbi Wittman From: Cameron Murray <ctmurray@mac.com> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 2:14 PM To: Abbi Wittman Subject: Fwd: Objections to the ZAT for a tobacconist So here are my objections, sent to Dave Junker and Mayor Kozlowski. Please inclu record. I won't be able to attend live. Thanks for the information about the meeting. Cam Begin forwarded message: From: Cameron Murray ctrratrrra y,ltp4p,c m Subject: Objections to the ZAT for a tobacconist Date: November 3, 2017 at 12:55:29 PM EDT To: David Junker <cljttnker(ci ci.stillwater.a n.us>, Ted Kozlowski -'tkoyjowskr(j ci„stiliwater.mn.us (t/ aMe N0.1011-477 As noted in your packet, I spoke against this ZAT in the planning commission meeting. A ZAT has a high bar to be enacted, as outlined in the staff report: As noted, a ZAT may only be approved when public necessity, the I ener ti community wob and goodzoningpractice permit the amendment. I don't believe that a tobacconist shop could be defended in a court of law as being a necessity. The reason this is not a necessity is that it has many CONS, and no real general public benefit. STAFF CONS: The staff report mentions issues with smoke infiltration into other adjacent buildings. The applicant says they will put in HVAC and scubbers with a negative pressure, but not a sealed room. So there is no guarantee that the smoke wont leak. We will only know after they have moved in. Please read Building Official Shilts summary of the situation in your packet. The staff report also highlight that you will be making an exception to the MN clean indoor act. Again how would such an exemption qualify as a public necessity. CAMS CONS: (I have thought of some others) Won't bars want similar exemptions so their patrons can smoke indoors? Bars will lose business to this operation, people could bring their own alcohol to the tobacconist and have a smoking bar. Bars then might want to re-classifying themselves as tobacconists,. The staff report notes that this definition could be vague and open to interpretation. i Before the the MN clean indoor act fully prevented indoor smoking bars did try the "HVAC system capable of removing all traces of smoke" and these did not work. I think this will increase smoking outdoors along the narrow sidewalks nearby. This was dismissed out of hand at the Planning Commission but I think human behavior is on my side. Certainly it will bring in more smokers. And once they have sampled something they might buy it and smoke outdoors on a nice day. Now smoking is fine outdoors, but it is not currently an issue on the sidewalks. But this shop is one store from the busy corner of Chestnut and Main, a place that is crowded with pedestrians. So someone smoking a cigar after leaving this shop will be a nuisance to many. Again not a public necessity. The city of Stillwater is turning from one of bars to one that will be more influenced by bicyclists. I don't think we should be encouraging negative social behavior by authorizing this ZAT. I would strongly recommend you go with your staff recommendations. The slight addition to the diversity downtown is not worth the ZAT. City Staff: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION As noted, a ZAT may only be approved when public necessity, the general community welfare and good zoning practice permit the amendment. In its current form, the ZAT does not meet those requirements. Additionally, a purpose of the Zoning Code is to provide "minimum requirements for the promotion of public health, safety and welfare. To protect the public, among other purposes, the provisions are intended to provide for adequate light, pure air, safety from fire and other danger..." Allowing for a use that would include indoor smoking, which adjacent tenants would not be protected from secondhand smoke, is in conflict with the Zoning Code. Cameron Murray 350 Main Street North Stillwater MN, 55082 2 November 5, 2017 Re: Case # CPC/2017-25 Mayor and City Council, FYI ft/,t/e Ntololii 'ECEIVED V 6 2011 This development was a foregone conclusion from the beginning but we will still state our objections. 1. If this was a hotel it would never be built in a residential area. Make no mistake this is no different than a three story hotel, with a veil on it, of course there will be more employees. 2. No meaningful modifications were made by your planning commission. 3. The planning commission couldn't answer simple questions? What density (units) is proper for this size building on this small piece of land? What distance from the West property lines should this be acceptable? Is this type of housing over built? When will this building in the next 10-20 years turn into low income housing and become a future ghetto? How this will affect future property values? 4. This city has had large concerns in the past over sightlines and heights when concerning river views, why don't we get the same consideration with what we will be staring at? I know this is all about the money for the City, Ecumen, and the future expansion of the church. We are very disappointed with the process and so little consideration for the adjoining Stillwater residents. Jim and Barb Ylinen 201 Deer Path Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Abbian 11111.01116. From: Sent: To: Subject: Jenn Sundberg Monday, November 06 2017 8:09 AM Abbi Wittman FW: City of Stillwater Case #CPC/2017-48 Original Message From: Barb [mailtomnsn.cum] Sent: Sunday, November 05 2017 7:15 PM To: ]enn5undberg"jxundberg@cistiUxvaternnnus> Subject: City ofStillwater Case #CPC/IOl7'48 City of Stiliwater Stiliwater City Council Stiliwater Planning Commission Re: Case #CP[/3O17-48 Members, We are deeply disappointed in the Stiliwater City Council and Planning Commission. Regarding the proposed senior living facilitylet's be clear: The best interests of the resideritsin the immediate neighborhood were at no time taken seriously. Our concerns, our hours spent at meetings, writing Ietters and emails, and voicing our objections and concerns fell upon deaf ears. THERE WAS NEVER A CHANCE THAT WE WOULD BE TREATED FAIRLY OR TAKEN SERIOUSLY. At the Iastmeeting one council member actually had the nerve to tell us that we were lucky that this giant, horrendous eyesore would be right behind our yards, instead of residential homes. This was one of the most moronic, offensive and insulting comments that we have heard in this process. Our residential neighborhood will now host an ugly, boxlike monstrosity which does not fit into our neighborhood. We will be staring up into it every day and night during the remainder of the time we reside here. The Stillwater City Council and the Planning Commission have failed the hard working,loyal, |avv-abiding,long time residents of this neighborhood and city. Period. In addition, my husband has also submitted an email on this topic on our behalf. Barbara Ylinen 201 Deer Path The Birthplace of Minnesota REGULAR MEETING RECESSED MEETING 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 2017 4:30 P.M. AGENDA 4:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Washington County - Upcoming Browns Creek Trail connection and 5 year County CIP Update 2. Discussion on Downtown Event Policy 3. Possible approval of proposal for Architectural Services for St. Croix Valley Recreation Center IV. STAFF REPORTS 4. Police Chief 5. Fire Chief - update on delivery of new Fire Engine 6. City Clerk 7. Community Development Dir. 8. Public Works Dir. 9. Finance Director 10. City Attorney 11. City Administrator 7:00 P.M. AGENDA V. CALL TO ORDER VI. ROLL CALL VII. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE VIII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 12. Possible approval of October 17, 2017 regular meeting minutes IX. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS 13. Badge Presentation/Oaths to Police Officers - Nolan Cornell, Laura McBroom, James Carter 14. Community Solar Gardens in Stillwater area - David Haeg, SolarMatch 15. Introduction of Major Eric Lewanski, Stillwater National Guard Readiness Center X. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. XI. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) all items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a council member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 16. Resolution 2017-213, Directing the Payment of Bills 17. Resolution 2017-214, approving Minnesota Premises Permit for Lawful Gambling for Eagles 94, located at 14200 60th St. N, Stillwater, Minnesota 18. Possible approval of Public Works Salt Shed Outside Storage (Shed Roof) 19. Resolution 2017-215, renewal of License for Stillwater Trolley 20. Resolution 2017-216, final acceptance of 2015 Street Projects 21. Resolution 2017-217, authorizing the preparation for and conducting of a sale of real estate -The Crosby Hotel XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - OUT OF RESPECT FOR OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE, PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 10 MINUTES OR LESS. 22. Case No. 2017-43. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request by Happy Bridge, LLC, property owner and Scott and Luke Sodergren, applicant, for the Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment, to allow a cigar shop and sampling room in the Central Business District. Complete property and legal description available upon request. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 29, 2017. (Ordinance - 1St Reading - Roll Call) 23. Case No. 2017-48. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request by Anne Stanfield of Ecumen and Our Savior's Lutheran Church for the Consideration of a Final PUD, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit for a senior living housing facility. The facility would be located at 114 Brick Street, and 1616 Olive St. PID 2903020420042 and 2903020420001. (Resolution - Roll Call) XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 24. Possible approval of Marine Circle Lift Station Project Bid Award, Project 2017-07 (2 Resolutions - Roll Call) XIV. NEW BUSINESS 25. Possible approval of Resolution Authorizing the call of the Outstanding General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C (Resolution - Roll Call) 26. Approval of construction staging area plan for the Lift Bridge Conversion Project XV. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) XVI. COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS XVII. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS XVIII. STAFF REPORTS (CONTINUED) XIX. ADJOURNMENT iliwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: Mayor & Council Members DATE: November 2, 2017 SUBJECT: St Croix Valley Recreation Center — Selection of Architectural/Engineering Firm Request for Preliminary Approval of Selected Firm FROM: Doug Brady, Facility Manager, St. Croix Valley Recreation Center Staff is requesting preliminary approval to negotiate a contract with the architectural firm selected by the review committee for the Recreation Center remodel and expansion project. The following process was utilized to review and evaluate proposals submitted for the project: An RFP for architectural/engineering services for the Recreation Center remodeling and expansion project was issued in September 2017. Sixteen interested firms attended a mandatory pre -proposal meeting and walk-thru at the recreation center on October 4, 2017. Of those sixteen firms, the following nine submitted a proposal: 1) 292 Design Group 2) Busch Architects Inc. 3) DeVetter Design Group 4) hw2 design 5) HDR, Inc. 6) HTG Architects 7) ICON Architectural Group, LLC 8) Kodet Architectural Group, Ltd 9) JLG Architects A selection committee was formed to review and rank the proposals submitted by these nine firms. The following four finalists were chosen to be interviewed by the selection committee on November 1, 2017. Included are each firms cost proposals. 1) HTG Architects: Fixed fee $206,250; Reimbursable expenses $0. 2) HDR, Inc: Fixed fee Phase 1 - $24,200; Phase 2 - 6-8% for cost of construction; Mileage and printing costs $600. 3) 292 Design Group: Fixed fee $245,000; Reimbursable expenses $3,500. 4) Busch Architects, Inc: Fixed fee $210,000; Reimbursable expenses $3,000. After the interview process and follow-up discussion the selection committee chose HDR, Inc as its choice for the most responsible architectural firm for this project. Staff is seeking preliminary approval to negotiate a contract with HDR, Inc. A resolution and contract will then be brought to City Council for final approval on November 21, 2017. Stt 1 Iwater The Birthplace sof ,Minnesafa 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES October 17, 2017 REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M. Mayor Kozlowski called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.rn. Present: Mayor Kozlowski, Councilmembers Menikheim, Weidner and Polehna Absent: Councilmember Junker Staff present: City Administrator McCarty City Attorney Magnuson Police Chief Gannaway Community Development Director Turnblad Finance Director Harrison Public Works Director Sanders Engineering Secretary Wolf PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Kozlowski led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. TOUR OF POLICE DEPARTMENT Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to adjourn the meeting at 6:36 p.m. to tour the Police Department. All in favor. Mayor Kozlowski reconvened the meeting at 7:08 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of October 3, 2017 regular and recessed meeting. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to approve the October 3, 2017 regular and recessed meeting minutes. All in favor. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS Greater Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce — Robin Anthony Robin Anthony, Executive Director of the Greater Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce, reported on the activities, programs and goals of the Chamber. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. City Council Meeting October 17, 2017 STAFF REPORTS Community Development Director Turnblad indicated that the University of Minnesota/ Minnesota Department of Transportation annual workshop is being held in Stillwater, using Main Street as a case study. City Administrator McCarty informed the Council that State legislators met with City officials yesterday about funding for St. Croix riverbank stabilization. He reminded the Council of the November 29 League of Minnesota Cities annual meeting; October 25 Dementia Friendly work training sessions; and a Clean Energy event series October 29 and November 12. CONSENT AGENDA Resolution 2017-204, directing payment of bills Resolution 2017-205, approval of agreement with SafeAssure Consultant, Inc. for OSHA and Safety Consultation Resolution 2017-206, approving assignment agreement with the Veterans Memorial Committee for 2018 Resolution 2017-207, approval of Changer Order #2 for 2016 Street Improvement Project (Project 2016-02) Possible approval of quote for security improvements for Public Works facility Resolution 2017-208, approval of dental and health insurance rates for 2018 Possible approval of gate purchase for Public Works Possible approval to purchase camera license upgrades for Fire Department, Recreation Center and Lily Lake Arena Possible approval of utility bill adjustments Possible approval of temporary liquor license — Washington County — Christmas at the Courthouse Resolution 2017-209, resolution supporting St. Croix Riverbank Restoration Project in the City of Stillwater Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Weidner, to adopt the Consent Agenda. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None PUBLIC HEARINGS A public hearing for the assessments associated with the 2017 Street Improvement Project (Project 2017-02). Public Works Director Sanders explained that the 2017 street improvement project is near completion. The bid came in about 15% lower than estimated, which will result in lower assessment rates. During construction, Brick, Seeley and Hemlock Streets were changed from a partial reconstruction to full reconstruct due to the pavement being worse than anticipated. The final construction cost of the project is estimated to be $1,524,333.30 and the total project is estimated to be $1,780,358.05. Properties in the project area will be assessed according to the following percentages: street reconstruction, 70%; mill and overlay, 80%; water and sanitary sewer replacement, 100%. The balance of an assessment after November 18 will be put on Page 2 of 7 City Council Meeting October 17, 2017 property taxes to be paid over a 10 -year period at 4% interest rate. It may be paid off any time in that 10 -year period. A total of 4.25 miles of streets were improved, involving 350 properties. Mr. Sanders further stated that 20+ objections were received from property owners. Property owners may appeal to District Court. State law and City Code allow for deferred assessments for homestead property owned by persons 65 or older. He added that Stillwater Country Club is not receiving an assessment because staff did not feel the cost of the assessment would benefit the golf course. Individual assessments are not increased because the golf course is not being assessed - the amount shows up in the City contribution to the project. Mayor Kozlowski asked how it is decided whether to replace a water service, and Public Works Director Sanders answered that the Water Board has a list of properties that still have galvanized water services, which tend to leak. Staff feels that street reconstruction is a good time to replace galvanized services. On a question by Mayor Kozlowski about the change in assessments for streets that were changed from partial to full reconstruction, Mr. Sanders replied that the assessments for those properties went from $5,600 to $7,200. Mayor Kozlowski asked Mr. Sanders to explain assessment rates for State Aid roads, and Mr. Sanders responded that homeowners on State Aid streets are charged at a lower percentage (50%) due to heavier traffic, making those streets deteriorate faster. Mayor Kozlowski opened public hearing. Alan Kantrud, attorney, indicated that he was asked by several residents on Moore Street to speak on their behalf. He told the Council that assigning a 70/30 split in terms of cost for these projects is by definition, arbitrary because the City may only assess an amount equal to the benefit conferred. His second objection is having the City pick up the golf course assessment, which he asserted is also arbitrary. His third objection is to the project itself. Assessing per unit makes sense, but those whose curb and gutter is not replaced should not be assessed the same amount as those whose curb and gutter is replaced. Jim Markall, 1336 Surrey Lane, expressed concern about the Benson Addition mill and overlay. He asked what will happen next year when the cracks reappear like they did in the section that was done last year; and Public Works Director Sanders answered that as a flexible pavement, asphalt will crack. Next year, the City will do crack sealing. The City stopped its sealcoating program in 2012 when it became apparent that a chemical reaction between the asphalt and the sealcoat was causing stripping of the top layer of asphalt. Jeanette Nelson, who owns property at 1325-27 South Sixth Street, voiced that the project did not benefit her because the old curb was not worn out. She would like a reduction in her assessment. She suggested the City repair Curve Crest Boulevard which is in very poor shape. Frances Myran stated she and her husband did not know they were getting assessed for their property at 1521 Olive Street West. They sold the property in July, so they paid $3,500 for a street they do not use. Public Works Director Sanders responded that neighborhood meetings were held during the last part of 2016, and notices went out in February for the public hearing on the project in March. Jan Wheeler, 320 South Brick Street, referred to a notice that stated the project would increase the valuation of her property. She asked the Council how that can be, since it is a street. City Attorney Magnuson responded that this year there were no separate appraisals done on any of the Page 3 of 7 City Council Meeting October 17, 2017 parcels in the project, partially because the City has done 4-5 appraisals every year for the last 4- 5 years. The projects are similar, the values are similar and the appraisers routinely give the opinion that the market value of the homes is increased at least by the value of the assessment. Ms. Wheeler inquired why she should receive a double assessment for living on the corner. Mr. Sanders replied that corner lots are assessed for a half a unit for each side improved. In the future when Olive Street is improved, Ms. Wheeler will get a half unit assessment for Olive. Roxanne Olson, 403 Hemlock Street South, stated she just has front footage but is being assessed the same as a corner lot. There is no street between her and her neighbor. She questioned how the property value of individual homeowners could increase but not that of the golf course; Mr. Magnuson replied that the appraiser was asked whether he thought the value of the golf course would be increased, based on its use as a golf course. The appraiser stated he knew of no precedent that would sustain an assessment to the golf course. Carol Gapen, 215 Moore Street West, asked that her two letters of objection be included in the Council's deliberation. She feels that City Attorney Magnuson is misinterpreting the Supreme Court case. Don Loida, 1705 Oak Street West, expressed that nothing has been done to the street in 30 years and now he gets a huge assessment. He feels he paid taxes to have the street maintained. He would like to know why his neighbor, who drives big trucks that deteriorate the road, is not assessed more. Monica Jones, 410 Hemlock Street South, asked why the water service assessments increased; and Mr. Sanders answered that the bids came in with a cost that was higher than estimated. The cost relates to economy of scale. Last year, 16 water services were replaced, but only five this year, so the price went up. Kalen Danley, 1221 Olive Street West, informed Council that he had some curb and gutter replaced on his driveway that had nothing wrong with it. He questioned why he was being assessed the same as someone who had complete curb and gutter replaced; and Mr. Sanders responded that staff and the contractor must determine if the gutter has adequate drainage for runoff, and that in a lot of instances on this project, the curb and driveway were integral with each other. He offered to meet with the homeowner to look at his property. Terry Hatchitt, 1619 Oak Street West, pointed out that in a four-year period, there have been three watermain breaks in that block. The company that paved did a great job, but the company that did the patching did shoddy work; and Mr. Sanders remarked that the Water Board is a separate entity from the City. They are responsible for the hiring the contractors to repair the watermain breaks. Ryan Bastyr, 1706 Oak Street West, stated the contractor did a great job with the asphalt, but he feels the costs are too high and that the City is not allowing for any middle ground with varying assessments. Mr. Sanders explained that Mr. Bastyr's property was part of the section that went from partial to full reconstruction. When the feasibility study was done, they did one boring on every block. This indicated a thin pavement section but 12" of aggregate underneath. However as the project got going and the contractor stated removing asphalt, it was discovered that the entire section did not have 12" of aggregate under the pavement. So the contractor had to place 6" of gravel, 4" of pavement on those sections, and also had to do some subgrade in some sections. A resident who did not identify himself asked how the City determined 4% interest. Finance Director Harrison replied that the interest rate was determined by the City a long time ago by Page 4 of 7 City Council Meeting October 17, 2017 adding 1% to the bond interest rate. Typically the City has been receiving about a 3% bond issue rate. LaRae Stiner, 1611 West Oak Street, indicated that her curb and gutter were not replaced, but she received the same assessment as everyone else. She questioned the total project cost and the total assessment amount versus the number of property owners being assessed. Public Works Director Sanders invited her to call him to go over the numbers. Geoff Crandall, 417 Moore Street, asked about a long pipe that was on Moore Street. Mr. Sanders explained that the Water Board had a separate project to connect the watermains on Williams and Poplar through the golf course. There were no service connections involved. Mr. Crandall asked if the residents are paying for the curbs on the golf course side. Mr. Sanders replied a catch basin was installed in a low area on Moore Street just west of Martha which made it necessary to raise the road up on the north side to get the curbs to match for better drainage. Mr. Crandall pointed out that at least 50% of the traffic on Moore Street is golf course traffic including delivery trucks. He feels the street project benefits the golf course. Mayor Kozlowski acknowledged that if Moore Street were not there, the golf course would lose significant value, but he added that the City Attorney, past history, and the appraiser all agree that the golf course should not be assessed. He mentioned that he wished the City did not have to assess property owners. Stillwater does not have the ability that larger cities do in looking at the minute details of every single assessment for every homeowner. Matt Olson, 1556 Driving Park Road, commented that if the Council is so offended by the golf course not getting assessed, then they should fix it. He also asked why the 1% is added to the assessment interest rate on top of the bond cost. Finance Director Harrison reiterated that adding 1% has been City policy since 1983 to cover administrative costs. Mayor Kozlowski closed public hearing. On a question by Mayor Kozlowski about why some curb and gutters were replaced and not others. Public Works Director answered that to keep overall project costs down, it was decided to replace only damaged curb. If property owners were to be assessed based on how much curb was done individually, it would take more computer time and staff time to figure that out. Councilmember Weidner inquired if existing curb and gutter fail, will the property owner be assessed again; and Mr. Sanders responded if a failure occurs before 20 years, they would not be assessed again. The City would tie the replacement cost into the operational budget. Mayor Kozlowski pointed out that he would not mind revisiting the assessment policy or considering other appraisers. There are pros and cons to how different cities handle assessments but there is no easy solution. Councilmember Polehna indicated that the City could not afford to pay 100% of the cost of street improvements. Lowering the assessment rate now would be unfair to residents who have been paying assessments for several years. Mayor Kozlowski asked if the Council could change the term to 15 years; and Ms. Harrison answered yes, the rate could be changed without affecting the bond rating. Councilmember Menikheim remarked that the larger problem is how to pay for streets. He inquired if it would be possible to make streets a line item budget and levy the whole City for all the streets. Page 5 of 7 City Council Meeting October 17, 2017 Councilmember Weidner acknowledged that the appeal process gives residents recourse which they would not have if the Council decided to do a blanket levy over the entire City. He urged property owners to take advantage of the appeal process if they do not feel their property has increased in value based on that amount. He would like to revisit the 1% interest rate. City Attorney Magnuson commented that there have been past projects with many appeals, for instance the South Hill project where assessments were $15,000 to $18,000. There are fewer appeals now because assessments are lower than they have been in the past. He explained the appeal process. On a question by Mayor Kozlowski if the Council should set a workshop to discuss the golf course, appraisals, and possibly doing different types of appraisals every year, Public Works Director Sanders responded that in future projects, staff could get 3-4 appraisals and look at getting different appraisers. Councilmember Menikheim stated he also wants to look at potential impacts of levying the cost of street work across the entire City. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to adopt Resolution 2017-210, resolution adopting assessments for the 2017 Street Improvement Project (Project 2017- 02), L.I. 413. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None UNFINISHED BUSINESS Stillwater Public Library Director Library Director Mark Troendle thanked the Council for welcoming him to the City. Possible approval of parking agreement with The Crosby Hotel City Attorney Magnuson explained the agreement memorializing public parking on the deck of the parking ramp that will be built by the developers of The Crosby Hotel. The agreement allows the developers to own, manage and maintain the public space, and to charge market rates for the public parking. Further, while some hotel and restaurant parking is allowed on the deck, it must not displace the public's use of the space. The developer is given the right to conduct events on the deck space, provided that an event permit is secured if needed, and the event use does not unreasonably displace the public parking. Lastly, the developers have agreed the public rights as outlined in the agreement are in perpetuity. The draft agreement was negotiated by City staff who recommend it for approval. Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Weidner, to adopt Resolution 2017-211, resolution approving Parking Agreement with the Crosby Hotel. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None Page 6 of 7 City Council Meeting October 17, 2017 NEW BUSINESS Discussion of sewer rate increase Finance Director Harrison led discussion of a possible sanitary sewer fund rate increase. The Met Council raises rates 3-4% every year and the City has not kept up. She added that during fiscal year 2016, the bottom line net loss was $344,000 and there are some major capital purchases coming in the near future. She explained three options for rate increases. Staff recommends Option 1. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to adopt Resolution 2017-212, resolution amending Resolution 2017-017, 2017 Fee Schedule. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS There were no Communications/Requests. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS Councilmember Polehna reported that Beyond the Yellow Ribbon had a successful hunt for 100 troops just returned from Iraq and Afghanistan. Another hunt is set for December 2. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to adjourn the meeting at 9:34 p.m. All in favor. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: J. Thomas McCarty, Acting City Clerk Resolution 2017-204, directing payment of bills Resolution 2017-205, approval of agreement with SafeAssure Consultant, Inc. for OSHA and Safety Consultation Resolution 2017-206, approving assignment agreement with the Veterans Memorial Committee for 2018 Resolution 2017-207, approval of Changer Order #2 for 2016 Street Improvement Project Resolution 2017-208, approval of dental and health insurance rates for 2018 Resolution 2017-209, resolution supporting St. Croix Riverbank Restoration Project in the City of Stillwater Resolution 2017-210, resolution adopting assessments for the 2017 Street Improvement Project (Project 2017-02), L.I. 413 Resolution 2017-211, resolution approving Parking Agreement with the Crosby Hotel Resolution 2017-212, resolution amending Resolution 2017-017, 2017 Fee Schedule Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Page 1 LIST OF BILLS 3D Specialties Inc. Ace Hardware Action Rental Inc. Advance Auto Parts Advanced Sportswear Amano McGann Inc American Med Supply Animal Humane Society Aspen Mills Atomic Architectural Sheet Metal AutoNation Becker Fire Safety Services LLC BHE Community Solar Board of Water Commissioner Bolton and Menk Inc. Braun Intertec Corporation Breth-Zenzen Fire Protection LLC Brines Market CDW Government Inc. City of Brooklyn Center Cole Papers Collagiate Concepts Comcast Core & Main CoStar Realty Information Inc County Materials Corporation Coverall of the Twin Cities Custom Fire Apparatus Davids Hydro Vac Dell Marketing L.P. Diamond Vogel Paints ECM Publishers Ecolab Pest Emergency Automotive Emergency Medical Products Environmental Equipment & Services Erenberg Sarah Ess Brothers & Sons Inc. Fastenal Company FedEx Felsch Chris Fire Safety U.S.A. FleetPride Flexible Pipe Tool Co. Forestry Suppliers Inc. Supplies Supplies Mixing trailer and concrete Equipment repair supplies Uniform Metric multi space meters Battery Pound charges Uniforms Install new flashing Vehicle repair Extinguisher Solar Garden WAC Charges Marine cir Ift station Police project 2017 sprinkler inspection Funeral food Computer equipment Tech day seminar Janitorial Supplies Stainless bottles with black imprint TV Internet & Voice Sewer repairs Property professional Catch basin & riser Commercial cleaning services New engine Hydro vac lift station Computer equipment Paint Publications Ant program Vehicle repairs Heartstart pads Sweeper Reimburse for mileage Insurance claims Equipment repair supplies Shipping Reimburse for fuel Supplies Equipment repair supplies Repair video cable Supplies 2,159.91 122.12 225.46 304.18 168.00 9,921.65 454.02 44.00 1,863.60 12,840.00 435.48 182.95 5,671.15 4,158.00 6,840.00 1,285.75 425.00 83.74 2,861.96 68.00 1,683.66 2,272.55 359.41 705.46 376.83 471.92 540.00 2,973.12 1,360.00 162.83 240.84 200.21 446.65 308.75 173.25 146,907.25 36.38 8,630.00 369.11 9.99 23.50 90.00 322.67 533.10 265.07 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 G & K Services Galls LLC Goodyear Commercial Tire Hagstrom Builders Hardrives Inc. Henricksen PSG Heritage Printing Inc. Hildi Inc Holiday Companies Home Energy Center HTS Fitness LLC I State Truck Center J.P. Cooke Co. Johnson Controls Inc. Joshs Paint Repair Junker Brad Lake Country Door LLC Lametti and Sons Inc Lano Equipment Loffler Companies MacQueen Equipment Inc. Madden Galanter Hansen LLP Mansfield Oil Company Marshall Electric Company McCarty John Thomas Melstrom Jeff Menards Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Mechanical Contractors Mid-America Business Systems Miller Excavating MN State Fire Department Assoc NAPA Auto Parts National Reprographics LLC NPELRA Nuss Truck & Equipment Office Depot OnSite Sanitation O'Reilly Auto Parts Progressive Microtechnology Inc Regency Office Products LLC RJ Mechanical Robole Donna Roofing & Restoration Services Safe Assure Consultants Safe Fast Inc Scott County Treasurer Mats Flashlight Tires Refund of SAC & WAC Street Project Police project Utility billing forms Actuarial valuation Vehicle washes Refund of Permit Fee Refund of Variance Truck chassis Dog tags Police project Paint truck Reimburse for Halloween glow necklaces Repair door Remove buildings 1250 S Main St Seeder Professional services & equipment Jetter/Vactor Labor Relations Services Fuel Lowell park Reimburse for conf expenses Reimburse for work boots Supplies Monthly SAC Maintenance agreement Mold Abatement 2016 Street Project 2018 Membership Equipment repair supplies Scan building dept plans 2018 Membership Equipment repair supplies Office supplies Portable restroom rental Equipment repair supplies Supplies Supplies Repair Reimburse for mileage - conferences Refund of Permit Fees Safety training Safety equipment Training Page 2 44.48 53.92 930.28 3,485.00 524,388.16 43,212.19 506.50 850.00 320.00 59.60 225.00 106,567.00 80.50 8,803.00 1,549.50 149.90 835.00 14,600.00 6,014.85 6,272.89 270,375.00 77.50 5,546.80 1,402.00 648.52 160.00 1,118.41 19,681.20 2,162.00 3,894.00 68,010.69 423.00 24.13 1,524.60 200.00 132.26 790.54 432.00 459.10 154.34 25.02 500.00 73.83 974.00 4,057.56 1,026.58 1,400.00 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION *2017-213 Siegfried Construction Company George SiteOne Landscape Supply Springsted St. Croix Boat and Packet Co. Stillwater Collision and Mechanical Stillwater Motor Company Streichers Stripe A Lot Doug McLean dba Sun Control of MN T.A. Schifsky and Sons TBEI Inc/Crysteel Manufacturing Tri-State Bobcat Truck Utilities Inc. Turnblad Bill United Rentals North America USAble Life Verizon Wireless Veterans Memorial Washington Conservation Distr Washington County Road & Bridge Water Works Irrigation LLC Wenck Construction Were Bruce White Bear Tire & Auto Inc. Wold Architects and Engineers WSB & Associates Inc. Wulfing David Young Dan Ziebart of MN REC CENTER 1ST Line/Leewes Ventures LLC 4Front LLC AT&T Mobility BDI Gopher Bearing Corval Constructors Holiday Credit Office ISD #834 Stillwater Area Schools Menards Nardini Fire Equipment Pepsi Beverages Company R&R Specialties Inc. Riedell Shoes Inc. St. Croix Boat and Packet Co. Stillwater Turf & Power LLC Twin Cities Dots & Pop City Hall stair repair Supplies Continuing disclosure services Ramp cleaning Repairs Vehicle service Uniforms & supplies Police parking lot Sun control window film Aggregate Equipment repair supplies Billy Goat F18 Wheeled Blower Tech drawer unit Reimburse for car rental Cable ramps Term Life Insurance Wireless service Super Valu Parking 2nd & 3rd qtrs Shared Educator Traffic signal maint Trail improvements Police project Refund of UB overpayment Tires Police project Stormwater mgmt plan update Reimburse for K9 boarding Reimburse for fuel Rust protection on new vehicle Snacks for concessions Graphics Cell phone Equipment repair Equipment repair supplies Fuel Community Ed Ad Supplies Equipment repairs Beverages for concessions Equipment repair supplies Skates Arena billing Repair supplies Concession supplies Page 3 20,772.90 45.30 3,400.00 810.00 16,414.43 95.68 1,002.86 350.00 275.00 1,085.76 70.72 1,950.00 1,800.00 133.89 480.00 444.00 2,865.35 8,694.00 625.00 98.16 1,750.00 31,554.36 294.95 916.97 922.50 4,004.50 100.00 22.00 627.50 402.70 250.00 147.90 815.41 355.00 6.61 700.00 349.12 102.25 283.12 77.65 217.59 43,129.26 192.37 949.23 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Washington County Dept of Public CREDIT CARDS Amazon.com Backgroundchecks.com Hamline University Graduate Log Me In MN Fire Srv. Cert. Board Network Technologies University of MN CCE Registration Walmart.com LIBRARY Baker and Taylor Brodart Co Culligan of Stillwater Demco Inc. ECM Publishers Gaylord Bros Inc. Master Mechanical Inc. MEI Total Elevator Solutions Menards Midwest Tape Minitex Office of MN IT Services Petrie Angela Quill Corporation Security Response Services Inc Toshiba Business Solutions Troendle Mark J Value Line Publishing Inc. Viking Auto Sprinkler Co. Xcel Energy LIBRARY CREDIT CARDS Amazon Superior Hiking Trail Assc OCTOBER MANUALS Century Link Comcast G&K Services Post Board Food & Beverage License Supplies Background checks Insights & Trends Seminar Sewer telemetry LogMeln MFSCB Bulk Recertification IP video extenders Project mgmt class Equipment Materials Materials Water Processing Supplies Publishing - Board Posting Processing Supplies Preventative Maintenance Elevator Repairs Janitorial Supplies Materials Materials Phone - September Staff Reimbursement General Supplies Security Monitoring Maintenance Contract Relocation Expense Stipend Materials Annual Maintenance Energy Materials Materials Telephone TV Internet & Voice Uniforms & Mats Officer License Page 4 617.00 477.29 73.90 50.00 267.80 100.00 507.74 470.00 93.84 2,571.54 3,516.70 14.55 41.10 28.14 73.39 1,126.50 264.00 57.28 3,232.79 798.00 375.61 460.57 543.72 168.12 75.13 5,000.00 470.00 560.00 4,477.01 32.11 42.86 87.11 383.33 553.36 270.00 EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION #2017-213 Page 5 Postmaster Xcel Energy Newsletter & UB billing Energy 4,381.93 21,157.85 RESOLUTION 2017-214 APPROVING MINNESOTA PREMISES PERMIT FOR LAWFUL GAMBLING FOR EAGLES 94, LOCATED AT 14200 60TH ST. N., STILLWATER, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Eagles 94 have submitted an application to the City of Stillwater requesting City approval of a Minnesota Gambling Premises Permit application located at Eagles 94, located at 14200 60th St. N., Stillwater, MN; and WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated that the organization is collecting gambling monies for lawful purposes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Stillwater approve the local gambling located at Eagles 94, 14200 60th St. N., Stillwater, MN. The City Clerk is directed to attach a certified copy of this resolution to the application to be submitted to the Gambling Control Board. Adopted by the City Council for the City of Stillwater this 5th day of October, 2017. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane F. Ward, City Clerk MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG214 Premises Permit Application 6/15 Page 1 of 2 Annual Fee $150 (NON-REFUNDABLE) REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS TO LG214 1. If the premises is leased, attach a copy of your lease. Use LG215 Mail the application and required attachments to: Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity. Minnesota Gambling Control Board 2. $150 annual premises permit fee, for each permit (non-refundable). 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Make check payable to "State of Minnesota." Roseville, MN 55113 Questions? Call 651-539-1900 and ask for Licensing. ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Organization Name: E49 it d le -5 -r License Number: 400/5.41 -ca 1 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) B06 PAA -4-0/‘41 Daytime Phone: to IA -39u, - 6,110 Gambling Manager: ArCI-CA1n4.. C A ra LI Daytime Phone:'715 ' &' O e/5Z 1 GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATION Current name of site where gambling will be conducted: EC(.G Lo 5 cl 4-1 List any previous names for this location: Street address where premises is located: 1y260.- ( 0jf. No. (Do not use a P.O. box number or mailing address.) City: OR Township: 5h 1 t r County: Zip Code: has ti .051 -or) 5s0$ a— Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? Lawful Gambling Activity. StYes No If no, attach LG215 Lease for A lease is not required If only a raffle will be conducted. Is any other organization conducting gambling at this site? Note: Bar bingo can only be conducted at a site where another zation or another permitted organization. Electronic games Has your organization previously conducted gambling at this Yes %No Don't know form of lawful gambling can only be conducted at is being conducted by the applying organi- a site where paper pull -tabs are played. No LJDon't know site? 1Yes GAMBLING BANK ACCOUNT INFORMATION; MUST BE IN MINNESOTA Bank Name: Bank Account Number: Bank Street Address: City: State: MN Zip Code: ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT OFF-SITE STORAGE SPACES Address (Do not use a P.O. box number): City: State: Zip Code: MN MN MN LG214 Premises Permit Application 6/15 Page 2 of 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT: APPROVAL BY RESOLUTION City Name: Date Approved Resolution (If none, Signature CITY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located within city limits 5 1 1, 11 'i COUNTY APPROVAL for a gambling premises located in a township County Name: /e—r IJVJm � by City Council: / ail _ Date Approved by County Board: ^� Number: d UTL ' Resolution Number: _o f attach meeting minutes.) of City Personnel: (If none, attach meeting minutes.) Signature of County Personnel: Title: Date Signed: Title: Date Signed: TOWNSHIP NAME: Local unit of government must sign. Complete below only if required by the county. On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying to conduct gambling activity within the township limits. (A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minnesota Statutes 349.213, Subd. 2.) Print Township Name: Signature of Township Officer: Title: Date Signed: ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND OATH 1. I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, 6. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of the Board or its agents, and the commissioners of all activities to be conducted. revenue or public safety and their agents may enter and inspect the premises. 7. I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota governing lawful gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if licensed, 2. The Board and its agents, and the commissioners of to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to revenue and public safety and their agents, are them. authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of 8. Any changes in application information will be submitted to the current gambling rules and law. Board no later than ten days after the change has taken effect. 3. I have read this application and all information submitted to the Board is true, accurate, and complete. 9• I understand that failure to provide required information or providing false or misleading information may result in the 4. All required information has been fully disclosed. denial or revocation of the license. 5. I am the chief executive officer of the organization. 10. I understand the fee is non-refundable regardless of license approval/denial. Signature of Chief Executive Officer (designee may not sign) Date Data privacy notice: The information requested on this information when received by the Board. Minnesota's Department of Public Safety, form (and any attachments) will be used by the All other information provided will be Attorney General, Commissioners of Gambling Control Board (Board) to determine your private data about your organization until Administration, Minnesota Management & organization's qualifications to be involved in lawful the Board issues the permit. When the Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Auditor, gambling activities in Minnesota. Your organization has Board issues the permit, all information national and international gambling the right to refuse to supply the information; however, provided will become public. If the Board regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to if your organization refuses to supply this information, does not issue a permit, all information court order; other individuals and agencies the Board may not be able to determine your provided remains private, with the specifically authorized by state or federal law organization's qualifications and, as a consequence, exception of your organization's name and to have access to the information; individuals may refuse to issue a permit. If your organization address which will remain public. Private and agencies for which law or legal order supplies the information requested, the Board will be data about your organization are available authorizes a new use or sharing of able to process your organization's application. Your to: Board members, Board staff whose information after this notice was given; and organization's name and address will be public work requires access to the information; anyone with your written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format, i.e. large print, braille, upon request. An equal opportunity employer RESOLUTION 2017- 215 RESOLUTION GRANTING LICENSE TO STILLWATER TROLLEY FOR THE OPERATION OF TROLLEY TOURS ON CITY STREETS WHEREAS, Rivertown Transportation LLC, dba Stillwater Trolley, made a request to renew their license to operate trolley tours on City roadways; and WHEREAS, Rivertown Transportation LLC has requested, as it does annually, two reserved on -street parking spaces for the trolleys; and WHEREAS, Rivertown Transportation LLC operates a ticket booth that through a grandfathered set of circumstances is on City property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Stillwater City Council hereby grants license to Rivertown Transportation LLC to operate Stillwater Trolley subject to the following conditions: 1. Two on -street parking spaces are hereby reserved in the locations shown in Exhibit A, providing that a $1,290 reservation fee be paid the City annually ($645 per space). 2. This license is valid for three years, but fees will be reviewed annually. 3. During periods of flooding, the City uses the area immediately surrounding the ticket booth and trolley parking spots for levee construction and flood fighting. Therefore, during these times the tours will not be allowed to operate from this location. 4. Stillwater Trolley operates its ticket booth from electricity provided by the City. The costs of relocating the electrical infrastructure will be the responsibility of Stillwater Trolley, as will be the monthly cost of electrical usage 5. Rivertown Transportation LLC must carry $5,000,000 of public liability insurance for Stillwater Trolley, as required by State law for "Common Carriers for Hire" and Rivertown Transportation LLC must name the City as an "additional insured" in the policy. 6. All trolleys must meet safety inspection requirements as established by State law. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 7th day of November, 2017. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Exhibit A Re-Irncated Current ticket booth Future trail rolley parking space 2 Trolley parking space 1 Sffl1wae! :HL BIRIHPIACE O C AIIHNCSOTA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Shawn Sanders, Public Works Director/ City Engineer DATE: November 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Works Salt Shed Outside Storage (Shed Roof) Background The Public Works Facility currently has an existing salt shed for salt storage that is also utilized for storage of equipment both inside and outside along the north wall. Salt/sanders and plows are stored outside in the elements and deteriorate from sun, rain and snow. Staff budgeted $25,000.00 in 2017 to construct a shed roof on the outside of the salt shed to protect equipment from the elements. The shed roof was designed by a structural engineer at a cost of $4,800.00 which left $20,200.00 for construction. DISSCUSSION Staff has received quotes for the construction of the shed roof and a low bid of $26,250.00 was received by J. B. Contracting of Stillwater. The bid puts the project over budget by $6,050.00. Cost to furnish and install top cap for the public works building came in under budget by $12,160.00, a portion of that money could be used to complete the shed roof project. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of J. B. Contracting of Stillwater for the construction of the shed roof for $26,250.00. Funds will come from the Streets Capital Outlay Shed Roof and Top Cap Fund. Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council From: Shawn Sanders, Director of Public Works Date: November 3, 2017 Subject: Acceptance of Work and Final Payment 2015 Street Improvement Project (Project 2015-02) DISCUSSION The work on the above project has been completed. The contractor has submitted their application for payment and required information to allow for final payment. If Council accepts the work and authorizes final payments the one-year warranty will begin. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council accept the work and authorize final payment to Hardrives, Inc. in the amount of $11,410.83. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with staff recommendation, Council should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 2017- , ACCEPTING WORK AND ORDERING FINAL PAYMENT FOR 2015 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2015-02). ACCEPTING WORK AND ORDERING FINAL PAYMENT FOR 2015 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (Project 2015-02) WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed between the City and Hardrives, Inc. for improvement of the 2015 Street Improvement Project (Project 2015-02) and their work has been completed with regard to the improvement in accordance with such contract, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the city clerk and mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment of $11,410.83 on such contract, taking Hardrives, Inc. receipt in full. Attest: Adopted by the Council, this 7th day of November 2017. Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Ted Kozlowski, Mayor RESOLUTION 2017-217 AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION FOR AND CONDUCTING OF A SALE OF REAL ESTATE WHEREAS, a purchase agreement was approved for the sale of a City Parcel to Midnight Real Estate Group and finalized along with a Development Agreement by Resolution No. 2017-211, and; WHEREAS, a closing on the purchase described in the Purchase Agreement has been tentatively scheduled for November 8th, and it is necessary that deeds be prepared for the closing and that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the deeds for delivery to the buyer, and the that the City Attorney be authorized to attend the closing and to insure that funds are either deposited to the City account by electronic transfer or paid by draft, in which case the City Attorney is authorized to take possession of the check for delivery to the City Finance director; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute any deeds or other documents necessary for conveyance of the City owned land that has been held for redevelopment, to the Midnight Real Estate Group as called for in the Purchase Agreement, and; 2. That the City Attorney is directed to prepare necessary documents needed for the closing or to review documents prepared by others and to attend the closing to insure that funds due the City from the closing be deposited with the Finance Director. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 7th day of November, 2017. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane F. Ward, City Clerk -fit 'water El q" i I °. A F p f M I N N F S 0 1 A CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 7, 2017 CASE NO.: 2017-43 Planning Commission: October 11, 2017 APPLICANT: Scott and Luke Sodergren REQUEST: Request for a Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) to allow for "Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products" to be permitted in the Central Business District as well as to define Tobacconist in the City Code ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN: Downtown Mixed use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND Scott and Luke Sodergren have applied for a Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) to add the following to the Zoning Code: Amending Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding the following Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco -related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate walk-in, on-site humidor.? Alter Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by adding ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC C O BP -CRD PA PWFD PROS Tobacco products, P ' Bold, underlined, and italicized is proposed to be added. All text without special font is existing. Case No. 2017-43 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 2 of 5 general, non- specialty1; sale of Tobacconist P operation; sale of specialty tobacco productsl On October 11, 2017, the Planning Commission heard this case and forwarded on a recommendation of conditional approval. If the Zoning Text Amendment were approved, the applicant would then proceed with the opening of a cigar shop at 209 Main Street North. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Municipal Code Section 31-205, Zoning Map and Zoning Text Amendment, indicates amendments may be made when public necessity, the general community welfare, and good zoning practice permit the amendment. The following findings must be made before an amendment to the zoning map or text is made: • That the public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered; and ■ That the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN During the development of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, plan workshop participants indicated a lack of diversity of businesses was a weakness of the downtown area. If approved, the proposal to allow for premium tobacco products in the Central Business District would not only help diversify the types of business but it would also help further the City's efforts to achieve: ■ The Land Use and Downtown Urban Design goal two to "encourage a viable and compatible mix of community and visitor -serving activities that builds on the assets of downtown..." (page 6-24) • The Local Economy policy 5 to "encourage downtown as a relocation destination for successful businesses" (page 6-63) DISCUSSION SUMMARY While the applicant has provided a specific plan for the future use of the aforementioned parcel, this is not for the Council's consideration at this time. The application before the Council is whether or not the proposed Tobacconist definition should be added to the Zoning Code and whether or not Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products should Case No. 2017-43 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 3 of 5 be an outright permitted use (not requiring a Special or Conditional Use Permit) in the Central Business District. The applicants have indicated it is their desire to provide the community with "the opportunity to purchase and enjoy premium cigars and pipe tobacco." The applicant has verbally indicated their desire to have a sampling (smoking) lounge associated with the retail sales. A draft ordinance, based on the applicant's proposal, is attached for the Council's consideration. The retail sales of tobacco in the Central Business District is, generally speaking, in conformance with the requirements set forth by the Zoning Amendment regulations. However, staff concerns are: • "Specialty Tobacco Products" is not defined and could result in a Zoning Code definition that is open to interpretation (such as including flavored tobacco, vapor oils, or specialty cigarettes); and • The permitting of this type of Central Business District business could have the following negative implications: o The general community welfare in relationship to the unintended permitted use of indoor smoking exemption from the Clean Indoor Air Act; and o Provisions for public health respective to the seepage of secondhand smoke; and o The structural and architectural integrity of buildings in the downtown core that could occur if modifications are necessary for the creation of sampling lounges. The Planning Commission discussed the diversification of Stillwater's economy as an important factor in consideration of this ZAT. They also determined general nuisance and public health effects of indoor smoking as a plausible grounds for prohibiting the indoor sampling areas. Draft minutes of the October 11, 2017 are attached for review. PUBLIC COMMENT Since the Planning Commission meeting, public comments were received from Cameron Murray, 350 Main Street North, unit #346. Mr. Murray is not in favor of the ZAT, citing it is not a public necessity. ALTERNATIVES The City Council has the following options available: A. Approval If the City Council finds the public necessity and the general community welfare warrant the Zoning Text Amendment and that amendment is in general conformance with the principles and policies set forth in the comprehensive plan, then the Council could approve the first reading of the attached Ordinance. Case No. 2017-43 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 4 of 5 B. Table If the City Council finds that the application is not complete enough to make a decision, it could continue the review for additional information. C. Denial If the City Council finds the proposal is not consistent with the requirements set forth for Zoning Text Amendments, the Council could deny the first reading of the Ordinance. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION As noted, a ZAT may only be approved when public necessity, the general community welfare and good zoning practice permit the amendment. In its current form, the ZAT does not meet those requirements. Additionally, a purpose of the Zoning Code is to provide "minimum requirements for the promotion of public health, safety and welfare. To protect the public, among other purposes, the provisions are intended to provide for adequate light, pure air, safety from fire and other danger..." Allowing for a use that would include indoor smoking, which adjacent tenants would not be protected from secondhand smoke, is in conflict with the Zoning Code. Planning Commission The Planning Commission recommended approval of the applicant proposed Ordinance with the amendment Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products would be permitted by Conditional Use Permit. Staff Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance with the following amendments: 1. Alteration of the proposed Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by indicating: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC BP- C BP- 0 BP- I CRD PA PWFD PROS Tobacconist CUP operation; gale of tobacco specialty product3 2. With a condition of approval that Section 41-2, Licensing of tobacco sales; possession and use by minors, Subd. 11, be amended by adding Subpart (8) to read: Case No. 2017-43 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 5 of 5 (8) Indoor sampling. It is a violation of this section for any retail tobacco shop, specialty tobacco products shop, or in any tobacconist operation proprietor to allow for tobacco sampling or the use of a tobacco related device indoors. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Applicant Narrative (2 pages) October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Staff Report Draft Planning Commission minutes Public Comment Draft Ordinances (3) , , , ,N.� �� 5 , i -�-_ --fillwater The Birthplace of Minnesota v PEEN a Lo iptire w :41 Won . -- _ y' v • `:! � 221 �N�P0•04 Site Location Map < �\ �. `i, REE s sc MYR1`�s (f)� N t©1 m S1 -- 2 �Pm y 2 X36 C ` '�y• V ' O I. o vv� i♦ N\ S� 37, 23 �' m G s P `` �(c\ \, Z � - tea m� 209 Main Street South 0 160 320 640 Feet ^ li, i i1 * 5 \ 'o� �z General Site Location V cn ^tr.\ � Al ,� ; ' 1 �• gym.: 1 E ^^f 0, SSR �� w S�N I. ' , . %, , c. @4 1 ��(. ,� Ai'�.m^ R i �1 T CP G m . 1 L.. -� ' iOp •may .7 ,O-w `„,...,01,N0` \` CP C. S ,, ; , Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 September 7, 2017 Dear Community Development Department, We are requesting a Zoning Text Amendment to be able to provide the residents of, and visitors to, Stillwater the opportunity to purchase and enjoy premium cigars and pipe tobacco. Currently, cigar and pipe smokers must travel to St Paul or Hudson to make their purchases, thereby taking revenue away from Stillwater, and bringing it to other communities. The typical premium pipe and cigar smoker is the ideal visitor that Stillwater seeks to attract. These individuals tend to be affluent and middle-aged, people who enjoy restaurants, shopping, lodging and have disposable income that the other businesses in downtown Stillwater would love to see. Certain types of tobacco shops attract elements that may be deemed as less desirable. These are shops that feature discount cigarettes, glass pipes, hookah, and other products that don't belong in an upscale and historic business district. We assure you that we will never carry such products; we will only carry premium hand -rolled cigars, premium pipe tobacco and ancillary products for the discerning tobacco enthusiast, such as professional grade humidors, cutters, lighters, etc. In an effort to help in this regard, our trade association, the IPCPR, has crafted language that would allow premium and upscale tobacco retailers, as we propose, while disallowing other less desirable tobacco -related businesses from opening. The language is similar to what has been used elsewhere in other municipalities to help solve this dilemma. Here is the language they propose: Category one: Tobacco products, general, non -specialty; prohibited Category two: Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products; permitted Definition: "Tobacconist" means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco, premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco -related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate a walk-in, on-site humidor. This language obviously amends allowable use 11 from a total ban on tobacco sales in the CBD, to a ban on shops that sell cigarettes, rolling paper, glass pipes,etc., while allowing the "tobacconist" to conduct business that is of similar appeal and professionalism to shoppers who frequent other retail businesses in the CBD. By adding this amendment, the city can continue to prevent the opening of these undesirable shops in the CBD. We hope to open by Jan 1, 2018. We currently operate a premium cigar and pipe shop in Osceola, WI, called "Sodie's Cigar Shop". I encourage you to visit our shop, check out our website (www.sodiescigars.com), or contact the City of Osceola to find out about our shop there. We currently own and operate a successful staffing company with seven locations in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and have done so for the past 28 years. We have a track record of success and longevity in business. For this cigar shop we will be hiring, in addition to the store manager, 2-3 full and part-time employees who will go through extensive training by our manager and by us. We have an experienced local carpenter prepared to build the walk-in humidor, we have an experienced manager hired and ready to work. And we will soon be reaching out to the state to procure all the proper licensing required. A high-end tobacconist shop is a welcome addition to any community due to the customer base it draws. I hope the city will recognize our proposal as a benefit to the community; creating customers and adding jobs while adding to the unique and vibrant downtown Stillwater shopping experience that has been created and grown over many years. Sincerer, Scott Sodergren and Luke Sodergren Sodie's Cigar Shop Proprietors fflwater H E 6. R T H P 1. A C E Of MINNFSOIT A PLANNING REPORT MEETING DATE: October 11, 2017 APPLICANT: REQUEST: Scott and Luke Sodergren, Sodie's Cigar Shop CASE NO.: 2017-43 Request for a Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) to allow for "Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products" to be permitted in the Central Business District as well as to define Tobacconist in the City Code ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN: Downtown Mixed use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REVIEWED BY: City Attorney Magnuson APPLICANT REQUEST Scott and Luke Sodergren, of Sodie's Cigars, would like to expand their Osceola, WI, business by opening a retail store at 209 Main Street North in the Central Business District. While the Zoning Code allows for tobacco sales as an accessory use (such as in the gas station or in a bar), retail tobacco sales as a primary use is not permitted nor are they allowed by Use Permit. The specific Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) request, as noted below in bold, underlined italics is for: Amending Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding the following Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco - related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate walk-in, on-site humidor. Alter Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by adding ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC BP- BP- BP- CRD PA PWFD PROS While not indicated in the aforementioned proposal, the applicant have indicated it is their desire "the opportunity to purchase and enjoy premium cigars and pipe tobacco." The applicant has verbally indicated their desire to have a smoking lounge associated with the retail sales. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS City Code Section 31-205, Zoning Map and Zoning Text Amendment, indicates amendments may be made when public necessity, the general community welfare and good zoning practice permit the amendment. The following findings must be made before an amendment to the zoning map or text is made: • That the public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered; and ■ That the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. The retail sales of tobacco in the Central Business District is, generally speaking, in conformance with the requirements set forth by the Zoning Amendment regulations. However, the permitting of this type of business could have negative implications in the Central Business District. Staff does have concerns for the general community welfare in relationship to unintended permitted uses, provisions for public health, and the structural and architectural integrity of buildings in the downtown core. Unintended Permitted Uses The applicant's business would be licensed as a Tobacco Products Shop' with the State of Minnesota. In State Statue, there is no separation between different types of Tobacco Products Shops. As the City will not be able to confirm the percentage of sales for this businesses, or any other 'Tobacconist Operation" that would want to open in the Central Business District, allowing this use as an outright permitted use would prevent review of any Tobacco Products Shops prior to them opening. While the applicant is aiming to establish a difference between cigars and other types of smoking products and accessories, "pipe tobacco and tobacco -related ' MN Statute 114.4167, defines a Tobacco Products Shop as a "retail establishment with an entrance door opening directly to the outside that derives more than 90 percent of its gross revenue from the sale of loose tobacco, plants, or herbs and cigars, cigarettes, pipes, and other smoking devices for burning tobacco and related smoking accessories and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental." Case No. 2017-43 CPC: 10.11.2017 Page 2 of 6 C 0 I Tobacco products, general, non -specialty; P sale of Tobacconist operation; P_ sale of specialty tobacco products While not indicated in the aforementioned proposal, the applicant have indicated it is their desire "the opportunity to purchase and enjoy premium cigars and pipe tobacco." The applicant has verbally indicated their desire to have a smoking lounge associated with the retail sales. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS City Code Section 31-205, Zoning Map and Zoning Text Amendment, indicates amendments may be made when public necessity, the general community welfare and good zoning practice permit the amendment. The following findings must be made before an amendment to the zoning map or text is made: • That the public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered; and ■ That the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. The retail sales of tobacco in the Central Business District is, generally speaking, in conformance with the requirements set forth by the Zoning Amendment regulations. However, the permitting of this type of business could have negative implications in the Central Business District. Staff does have concerns for the general community welfare in relationship to unintended permitted uses, provisions for public health, and the structural and architectural integrity of buildings in the downtown core. Unintended Permitted Uses The applicant's business would be licensed as a Tobacco Products Shop' with the State of Minnesota. In State Statue, there is no separation between different types of Tobacco Products Shops. As the City will not be able to confirm the percentage of sales for this businesses, or any other 'Tobacconist Operation" that would want to open in the Central Business District, allowing this use as an outright permitted use would prevent review of any Tobacco Products Shops prior to them opening. While the applicant is aiming to establish a difference between cigars and other types of smoking products and accessories, "pipe tobacco and tobacco -related ' MN Statute 114.4167, defines a Tobacco Products Shop as a "retail establishment with an entrance door opening directly to the outside that derives more than 90 percent of its gross revenue from the sale of loose tobacco, plants, or herbs and cigars, cigarettes, pipes, and other smoking devices for burning tobacco and related smoking accessories and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental." Case No. 2017-43 CPC: 10.11.2017 Page 2 of 6 accessories" could include products not related to the type of business the applicant seeks to establish. Additionally, Tobacco Products Shops (where 90% of the "gross revenue from the sale of loose tobacco, plants, or herbs and cigars, cigarettes, pipes, and other smoking devices") are exempt from the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (MCIAA) meaning they may allow customers to sample (smoke) tobacco products indoors. While "sample" is defined as "a representative part or a single item from a larger whole or group especially when presented for inspection or shown as evidence of quality," sampling has varied interpretation. It can be argued that smoking a cigar is sampling a portion of the business inventory. Cigar lounges, where patrons purchase and enjoy their products onsite, exist in (at least) Lilydale, Minneapolis, St. Paul and Wayzata. In discussions with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), it is their interpretation theses businesses are not compliant with the exemption provisions as these businesses have a model where a patron may purchase a product and enjoy it in the lounge. However, MDH staff indicated that once establishments of this nature are open, the state law cannot be used to alleviate negative effects. Therefore, if the ZAT was approved as proposed, then indoor sampling would be an outright permitted use in the Central Business District. If indoor sampling is outright allowed by State Statute, then a cigar lounge could end up being an unintended, outright permitted use. Provisions for Public Health The MCIAA aims to further protect employees and the public from the health hazards of secondhand smoke. However, the MCIAA does not regulate smoke drifting from an area where smoking is unregulated. This is staff's largest concern with the outright permitted use retail use, which could allow for the right to smoke tobacco indoors. Most of the structures within the Central Business District were constructed in the 1800s. In addition to brick and mortar construction, which has so many unidentifiable penetrations and voids, most have shared walls to residential, restaurant, and other retail uses. As these structures are not airtight, secondhand cigar smoke will seep into adjacent tenant spaces without significant modifications to the structure. According to Building Official Shilts, if a business of this nature is proposed in a structure that is not structurally independent or has additional tenants, a smoke wall, ceiling or floor that would resist the passage of smoke (i.e. "smoke tight") should be required. This type of building construction may be able to be achieved in one of two ways: by sealing all existing and future penetrations (including, but not limited to, all brick and mortar joints) or by constructing an entirely new tenant space within the building's shell. Furthermore, Shilts has indicated the City should require all businesses to install an engineered HVAC system capable of removing all traces of smoke in the tenant space. Architectural Integrity If tobacco sampling is permitted, and certain structural improvements are required, there is risk that the interior and exterior modifications to the structure will jeopardize the structural and architectural integrity of some of Stillwater's designated historic resources. To achieve an "airtight" unit, interior modifications will require sealing the tenant space. However, Shilts has Case No. 2017-43 CPC: 10.11.2017 Page 3 of 6 indicated she is not aware of any smoke -tight sealants that could be used on brick and mortar; any hairline crack will allow for the seepage of smoke from one unit to another. Therefore, the construction of a new sealed space within the building's shell will be the only way to assure the unit is airtight. Constructing a new airtight unit will have impact to the interior brick and mortar, floors and ceiling of the structure. There is risk the installation, access to and maintenance of original infrastructure, as well as future removal could negatively impact the historic resource. HVAC units would need to be installed in a way that they conform to the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, necessitating review and approval by the City Heritage Preservation Commission prior to installation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN During the development of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, plan workshop participants indicated a lack of diversity of businesses was a weakness of the downtown area. If approved, the proposal to allow for premium tobacco products in the Central Business District would not only help diversify the types of business but it would also help further the City's efforts to achieve: ■ The Land Use and Downtown Urban Design goal two to "encourage a viable and compatible mix of community and visitor -serving activities that builds on the assets of downtown..." (page 6-24) ■ The Local Economy policy 5 to "encourage downtown as a relocation destination for successful businesses" (page 6-63) This is offset with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies that encourage the preservation of the integrity and architectural character of the community's historic resources. ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission has the following options available: A. Approval If the Planning Commission finds the public necessity and the general community welfare warrant the Zoning Text Amendment and that amendment is in general conformance with the principles and policies set forth in the comprehensive plan, then the Commission should move to recommend approval of Case No. 2017-43 with or without conditions. B. Table If the Planning Commission finds that the application is not complete enough to make a decision, it could continue the review for additional information. C. Denial If the Planning Commission finds the proposal is not consistent with the requirements set forth for Zoning Text Amendments, the Commission could recommend denial of the application. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION As noted, a ZAT may only be approved when public necessity, the general community welfare and good zoning practice permit the amendment. In its current form, the ZAT does not meet Case No. 2017-43 CPC: 10.11.2017 Page 4 of 6 those requirements. With a definition that is open to interpretation and the potential risk of the sale of other types of "specialty tobacco products," there is a significant risk if the City does not, at a minimum, consider "Tobacconist Operations" to be permitted specifically by Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, if an amended ZAT was approved, the Commission would have site- specific development review and the opportunities for public input would occur. A purpose of the Zoning Code is to provide "minimum requirements for the promotion of public health, safety and welfare. To protect the public, among other purposes, the provisions are intended to provide for adequate light, pure air, safety from fire and other danger..." Allowing for a use that would include indoor smoking, which adjacent tenants would not be protected from secondhand smoke, is in conflict with the Zoning Code. According to Minnesota Department of Health, Local governments retain the authority to adopt and enforce more stringent measures to protect individuals from secondhand smoke. Therefore, staff would recommend indoor sampling not be permitted if "Tobacconist Operations" were determined to be an appropriate use in the Central Business District. Staff finds that in its current form, the ZAT is not consistent with the Zoning Code, the Comprehensive Plan, nor the findings necessary to approve a zoning amendment. Therefore, staff would recommend denial. However, if certain modifications were made, then staff finds the amended ZAT would be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and the findings necessary to approve a zoning amendment. Staff would recommend the following: 1. Amending Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding the following: Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco -related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate walk-in, on-site humidor. 2. Alter Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by adding: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC BP- C BP- 0 BP- I CRD PA PWFD PROS Tobacco products, general, non -specialty; sale P of Tobacconist operation; sale CUP of specialty tobacco products Case No. 2017-43 CPC: 10.11.2017 Page 5 of 6 3. Amend Section 41-2, Licensing of tobacco sales; possession and use by minors, Subd. 11, by adding Subpart (8) to read: (8) Indoor sampling. It is a violation of this section for any retail tobacco shop, specialty tobacco products shop, or in any tobacconist operation proprietor to allow for tobacco sampling or the use of a tobacco related device indoors. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Applicant Narrative (2 pages) Case No. 2017-43 CPC: 10.11.2017 Page 6 of 6 THE 1INTNYLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 11, 2017 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairman Collins called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Collins, Commissioners Fletcher, Hansen, Kocon, Lauer and Siess Absent: Commissioner Hade and Councilmember Menikheim Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of September 13, 2017 regular meeting Motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to approve the minutes of the September 13, 2017 regular meeting. Motion passed 6-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2017-42: Consideration of a Variance to the maximum fence height in the exterior side yard of property located at 823 Fifth Street South. Michael Hinman, property owner. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Michael Hinman is requesting a 30" variance to the 42" maximum fence height in exterior side yard setback areas for the construction of a 72" fence. He is proposing to place the footings for the fence in a retaining wall on his property and adjacent to a public sidewalk. The wall is existing and in a dilapidated state but would be rebuilt at the time the fence is installed. The wall is approximately four feet tall at its highest point, so the top of the fence would be about 10 feet above the grade of the subject property's rear yard at this point. Staff recommends denial on the basis that if granted, the variance will alter the essential character of the locality and is contrary to the intent of providing an open streetscape. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Luke Hobbs, 811 Fifth Street South, stated he supports the granting of the variance for privacy and safety reasons. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 Commissioner Kocon said he supports the variance because the sidewalk looks down into the backyard. He sees the fence as ornamental and feels it will not impact traffic sight distance. Commissioner Siess stated she agrees with the code as written and opposes the granting of the variance. Commissioner Lauer noted it is difficult to see how the fence as proposed will fit into the neighborhood because despite the open bottom, it will look like a solid mass. Chairman Collins said he has a hard time supporting the variance due to the massing of the fence. Commissioner Hansen recognized there is a uniqueness to the neighborhood due to the commercial uses. He feels that the character of the neighborhood would not be altered by a six foot fence relative to the massing of the painted cinderblock building next door. He cited the safety and privacy concerns of the applicant due to the difference in elevation of the sidewalk versus the yard. He supports the variance. Commissioner Fletcher stated the proposed gaps at the bottom of the fence may not completely solve the safety issue. She understands the privacy concerns and is undecided about granting the variance. City Planner Wittman confirmed there would still be a grade differential from a proposed six-foot gap in the fence. The sidewalk is located on the applicant's property. The City was unaware of the grade change prior to the application. Commissioner Kocon noted the applicant was not present to discuss alternatives. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, to table Case No. 2017-42, Variance to the maximum fence height in the exterior side yard of property located at 823 Fifth Street South, to allow the property owner and the City to determine a design that will achieve the applicant's desires and protect the public from falls. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. Case No. 2017-43: Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment to allow a cigar shop and sampling room in the Central Business District (CBD). Happy Bridge, LLC, property owner and Scott and Luke Sodergren, applicants. City Planner Wittman stated that Scott and Luke Sodergren, of Sodie's Cigars, would like to expand their Osceola, WI, business by opening a retail store at 209 Main Street South in the Central Business District (CBD). While the Zoning Code allows for tobacco sales as an accessory use (such as in a gas station or bar), retail tobacco sales as a primary use is not permitted nor is it allowed by Use Permit. The specific Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) request is to amend Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding the following: "Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more of the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco- related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate a walk-in, on-site humidor." Ms. Wittman added that the applicant has verbally indicated their desire to have a smoking lounge associated with the retail sales. She further stated that Tobacco Products Shops are exempt from the from the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (MCIAA) meaning they may allow customers to sample tobacco products indoors. The MCIAA does not address smoke drift. Because the structure dates to the 1800s and shares common walls with other structures, there is the potential for smoke drift and second hand smoke. Therefore, Page 2 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 according to Building Inspector Cindy Shilts, smoke -tight construction would be required along with certain HVAC improvements. Staff finds that in its current form, the ZAT is not consistent with the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Plan, and recommends that the Commission recommend denial of the ZAT as proposed. However, if certain modifications are made, the amended ZAT could be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Applicants Scott and Luke Sodergren introduced themselves. Scott Sodergren explained why they want to expand to Stillwater and create a destination cigar shop. Their shop in Osceola has grown and done well. In Osceola, there is an apartment above them and another shop next to them. There has never been an issue with cigar smoke. They do not have a sampling room nor any indoor smoking at the Osceola shop due to state regulations in Wisconsin. Luke Sodergren stated he is buying the cigar shop business from his father Scott. The shop would sell cigars, pipe tobacco, and related items, but no cigarettes, e -cigarettes or vape accessories. They plan to install a strong HVAC system with air scrubbers. It would be challenging for them to have a profitable business without having a cigar sampling room. Chairman Collins asked if the applicants would be willing to seal off their smoking room. Luke Sodergren replied with two air scrubbers and a strong HVAC system to create a negative pull, it probably wouldn't be needed but they are willing to do whatever is required. Commissioner Siess asked if they looked at any other locations in downtown Stillwater. Luke Sodergren said they looked at other locations but what drew them to the proposed location is its size, view of the river, the stone wall with the fireplace and its aesthetic appeal. Cameron Murray, 350 Main Street North Unit 346, urged the Commission to deny the application because it does not further the public necessity or general community welfare. It would bring more smoking and more smokers to downtown and have unintended health consequences. Luke Hobbs, 811 Fifth Street South, said if the HVAC system is negative pressure, he would support the request as long as neighboring businesses are not affected by the smoke. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Chairman Collins remarked that he likes the diversity represented by the business, but feels that if permitted, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) should be required. Commissioner Kocon said he understands the Building Inspector's suggestion of building a shell and putting the shop inside it. He feels it is wise to require a CUP as opposed to it being an outright permitted use. He doesn't think any business in town wants people loitering outside their front door smoking. He could support the ZAT without a ban on sampling. Commissioner Hansen said he sees both sides of the issue. He understands the desire not to overly modify the historic buildings in downtown Stillwater. He feels a CUP should be required for all districts for such businesses. Page 3 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 Commissioner Lauer commented the business is a perfect fit for downtown but a CUP should be required. Commissioner Fletcher stated she supports the shop because it adds business diversity to downtown. Commissioner Siess stated she has no issue with the use, but she has an issue with the space. Motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to recommend that the City Council approve Case No. 2017-43, Zoning Text Amendment to allow a cigar shop and sampling room in the CBD, with staff -recommended language modifications: 1) defining Tobacconist and 2) adding Tobacconist operations and sale of specialty tobacco products, as well as tobacco, general, as an allowable use in the CDB and all other zoning districts with a CUP. Motion passed 5-1, with Commissioner Siess voting nay. Case No. 2017-47: Consideration of a Short Term Home Rental License Type B for the property located at 1004 Fifth Street North. Joseph Widmer, property owner. Ms. Wittman stated the applicant is requesting a Type B Short Term Home Rental License. The case is before the Planning Commission because a neighbor submitted a letter of objection citing concerns about the number of bedrooms and guests, and parking congestion. Staff finds that the request meets all conditions of the vacation rental ordinance and recommends approval. Commissioner Hansen expressed concern with the family room labelled additional sleeping space in the proposal. He feels this should not constitute additional sleeping space because it reduces the common space and this should be clarified in the code. Commissioner Kocon also questioned the labelling of the family room as a guest bedroom. Commissioner Siess stated that there will always be this problem, for instance houses that have lofts which are not dedicated bedrooms depending on how they are designed. Ms. Wittman said since it meets the code requirements for a sleeping room, staff felt the family room met the requirements for a bedroom but she can understand the Commissioners' concerns. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Joe Widmer, applicant, stated he was not planning on making the family room into a sleeping room. He is fine with five bedrooms. They do not intend to rent their home very often. Any socializing can spill into adjacent Staples Park and not onto other properties. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Chairman Collins, to approve Case No. 2017-47, a one- year provisional Type B Short Term Home Rental License for five guest rooms for the property located at 1004 Fifth Street North. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. Case No. 2017-48: Consideration of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit (SUP) for the properties located at 1616 Olive Street West and 114 Brick Page 4 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 Street South. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, property owner and Anne Stanfield, Ecumen, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Anne Stanfield, representing Ecumen, and Pastor Dale Stiles, representing Our Savior's Lutheran Church (OSLC), have submitted an application to develop a 15.01 acre site located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West. The City approved a Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this development in August 2017. Ecumen will be the owner and operator of the proposed Senior Care Living Facility and OSLC will continue to own their existing church structure on the site, which is proposed to be expanded in the future. The site would be developed in two phases: 1) Ecumen Stillwater, a 143 -unit senior living building, all parking, drive and pedestrian improvements for the two uses; and 2) a future Our Savior's Lutheran Church expansion. Ms. Wittman discussed the proposed plan in regard to parking, landscaping, covenants, pedestrian and traffic improvements, massing of the building, and signage. She summarized City staff comments and developers' revisions to the plan since concept approval was granted in August. A letter from a neighbor was received opposing the architectural design. City staff met with Washington County regarding traffic patterns which need to be discussed further. Ms. Wittman summarized written concerns received from neighbors: letters were received from Jim and Barb Ylinen, 201 Deer Path, regarding traffic, preservation of natural resources, noise, smells, and obstruction of views; and from Mike Miskowiak, 314 Hemlock, regarding loss of green space, traffic, noise, and light pollution. Staff recommends approval of the Final PUD, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat, and SUP with 12 conditions. Commissioner Siess asked who reviewed the geotechnical engineering services report. City Planner Wittman responded that Public Works Director Shawn Sanders reviewed the report. His comments and two suggested requirements are listed in the staff report. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Anne Stanfield, Ecumen, explained the intent to create a shared campus to support intergenerational programming between the residents of the senior living facility and Our Savior's Lutheran Church. Developers are prepared to comply with the staff -recommended conditions and have responded to neighborhood feedback. Mindy Michael, Kaas Wilson Architects, reviewed the current design of the project with images indicating revisions since concept approval. She emphasized the demand for senior housing. Chairman Collins asked if a pitched roof was considered so the structure is not so boxy. Ms. Michael stated they are bound by the height restriction of 35 feet. A pitched roof would preclude three stories, thus they are planning a flat roof. Chairman Collins asked about the plan for screening on the west side. Ms. Michael stated they propose planting trees as large as feasible. They would be willing to relocate more of the proposed trees to the west side if they would fit. Commissioner Siess asked about the chemical -type odor found in the soil, of undetermined source, noted in the geotechnical report done in March. Ms. Michael stated no further testing was done; it was believed to smell somewhat like fertilizer but it was not strong, it was mentioned in case it needed to be investigated further. Commissioner Siess asked Ms. Wittman if the City were to investigate it, what would happen? Ms. Wittman replied it would be an untraditional request and she has not dealt with that sort of request before. Page 5 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 Ms. Stanfield added the smell is in an area of poor soils where there will not be any building activity. They have avoided any disruption in that area. It only appeared in that one location. Commissioner Siess noted there are a lot of water pockets in Stillwater. On page 20, the geotechnical report discussed some water concerns. She asked if engineers looked at how neighboring areas have dealt with with water. Ms. Stanfield replied they investigated only the proposed site, no additional properties. Anecdotally, when taking the photo from 181 Deer Path, she did see their backyard was quite moist and they said they have quite a bit of drainage going into the pond north of their house. Commissioner Siess remarked there is a lot of discussion about senior housing but not about affordable senior housing. She asked if this facility will be considered high end or affordable. Ms. Stanfield replied that Ecumen has a range of housing from affordable to market rate senior housing. Their intent for this project is not HUD -subsidized but they want it to be financially accessible to a broad range of potential residents. Barbara Ylinen, 201 Deer Path, spoke in opposition, stating that she and her husband have lived in their home for 33 years. This enormous facility is all she will see from her windows and her backyard. The proposed modification is not significant enough to be an improvement. Commissioner Siess asked Ms. Ylinen to elaborate on odors she mentioned in her letter. Ms. Ylinen replied she was talking about the odors from an industrial kitchen which are a real concern. Dan Zenk, 261 Deer Path, asked how close the proposed building is to his property line. City Planner Wittman replied the distance is 70 feet. Mr. Zenk stated he planted all the trees because the church reconstruction resulted in light shining in his windows. He is concerned if the path is expanded, it will take out trees. Ms. Wittman replied the development will not be taking out trees on the western property line. The trail itself will stay as is. The east part of the trail will be a substrate that is placed and then planted with grass so a fire truck may drive on it. No changes are proposed to the westerly portion of the trail. Mr. Zenk continued that he does not want to see that large a building that close to his backyard. It will affect property values, cast more light, generate noise and cause fire trucks to be literally in his backyard. He also is concerned about safety and adding to Deer Path traffic volumes. Kyle Brandvik, 113 Brick Street South, voiced concerns about property values, green space, traffic, pollution, noise, and the impact on lifestyles. She questioned the notification about the neighborhood meetings, which seemed timed by the developer for holiday weekends. She has not seen renderings of what the buildings will look like and feels the neighbors are not aware of what is going on. Every time she comes there is a different plan. She added that there is a lot of concern about property values in the neighborhood. She doesn't question the value of an assisted living facility but feels it is not the right place. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kocon noted if the site were developed as single family, with over 60 homes, that would consume a lot of green space with roads, buildings and driveways. He feels the neighbors' concerns are legitimate but it would probably be more impactful if it were a single family development. He is not diminishing traffic, light and privacy concerns. He feels the staff report is very comprehensive. Page 6 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 Chairman Collins agreed that the staff report was thorough and addressed a lot of his concerns. To try to protect the views as much as possible, he would like to see the biggest trees possible planted on the western side, and would also like to see downlit and shielded lighting. With these additional conditions, he feels the development fits and will be a benefit to the community. Commissioner Fletcher said compared to a development of single family homes, this PUD with 50% open space is really compelling. Dense living takes a while to get used to but it is the wave of the future. She is in favor of the proposal with conditions discussed. Commissioner Siess said the developer and the Commission can try harder to accommodate the concerns. Fast growing trees die, so the developer should look at trees that will be long-lived. The building mass, especially in proximity to 261 Deer Path, needs to be re-examined. If the architects can do anything with a pitched roof, they owe it to the nearby homeowners. From a planning perspective, the City needs to consider what will be done with these structures after the baby boom is over. She encouraged everyone to consider this issue including the City, in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan update. She stated there are people who are looking at that from other perspectives, low income housing, disability housing, but City codes don't allow that right now. Commissioner Hansen noted that there is no way to know what the population of senior housing residents will be in the future but Stillwater is so deficient in that type of space now that it could probably be doubled and still be deficient. A certain density and number of units is needed to make these projects financially feasible. With a gable roof, it would not have that extra floor. He doesn't believe a gable roof would be appropriate on a three story building. He recognized that the building is massive but it is set far back. He is less concerned about traffic issues than before the traffic study. He is in favor of the project and thinks the applicant has addressed many of the issues. He realizes that the homeowners on Deer Path oppose the project. Commissioner Lauer said he favors the project. Regarding the life cycle of the building, it may become a destination for the whole metro area. He feels the proposal makes a lot of sense. City Planner Wittman acknowledged that the City and County need to look at the Olive/Brick/Myrtle system to design improvements as part of a future conversation with the Commission. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Lauer, to recommend that the City Council approve Case No. 2017-48, Final PUD, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit for the properties located at 1616 Olive Street and 114 Brick Street, with the 12 conditions recommended by staff, and the following additional conditions: 13) all lighting shall be downlit and shielded; 14) the landscaping plan shall be amended to provide coniferous trees on the west and east property lines, to provide for screening from all adjacent properties; 15) the applicant shall be responsible for installing a stop sign on Ramsey Street, in both directions. Motion passed 5-1, with Commissioner Siess voting nay. Case No. 2017-49: Consideration of a Variance to the front yard setback and the expansion of a legally non -conforming structure on the property located at 204 Birchwood Drive North. Genevieve Schulze, property owner and Cynthia Polzin, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Cynthia Polzin is requesting a 9' variance to the required 30' Front Yard Setback for the construction of a vestibule on a legal, non -conforming home. The home, permitted by the City prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, has a front yard setback Page 7 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 of 25', and the proposed vestibule would have a front yard setback of 21'. Finding that practical difficulty has been established, staff recommends approval with three conditions. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Hansen, to approve Case No. 2017-49, Variance to the front yard setback and the expansion of a legally non -conforming structure on the property located at 204 Birchwood Drive North, with the three conditions recommended by staff. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. Case No. 2017-50: Consideration of a Variance to the structural lot coverage and a Variance to the 30 foot Steep Slope Setback for the property located at 628 Olive Street West. Jenafer and Grant Smith, property owners. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Jenafer and Grant Smith have applied for variances to construct a temporary shed, to be located approximately 2' from a slope of greater than 25% in the rear of the property. Additionally, there is 1,954 square feet of structural coverage existing on the 7,017 square foot lot. The existing lot coverage is 27.8% of the total lot area. With the addition of a 120 square foot shed, the total structural coverage on the property will become 29.5% of the total lot area. Thus, the following variances are required: 1) a 28' variance to the 30' steep slope setback; and 2) a 4.5% variance to the 25% maximum structural coverage for the addition of 120 square feet of structural area. On the basis that practical difficulty has been established by the applicant, staff recommends approval with two conditions. Commissioner Kocon stated he is in favor of the request. He asked if there is any opportunity for a rain garden. City Planner Wittman replied it would be too close to the ravine, causing erosion. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Applicant Jenafer Smith stated she measured from where they constructed the retaining wall to the slope which is 13.10 feet. The whole area there is hostas and they did not disrupt that. She added that they have purchased the paint to match the house. The shed will be moveable. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Siess, seconded by Commissioner Hansen, to approve Case No. 2017-50, Variance to the structural lot coverage and Variance to the 30 foot Steep Slope setback for the property located at 628 Olive Street West, with the two conditions recommended by staff, and the following additional condition: the accessory structure shall be the same color as the primary residence. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. STAFF UPDATES Water Street Inn Appeal Page 8 of 9 Planning Commission — Draft Minutes October 11, 2017 City Planner Wittman informed the Commission that the appeal was approved by the City Council. October 19 Comprehensive Plan Review Session City Planner Wittman informed the Commission that a review session will be held October 19 for all Commissioners and Councilmembers regarding the process for the Comprehensive Plan update. Code Changes Commissioner Siess asked for a status on the code changes. City Planner Wittman said due to workload she is hoping to accomplish this in November. Meeting with the City Council Commissioner Siess asked about scheduling a Planning Commission meeting with the City Council. Ms. Wittman replied that the Comprehensive Plan update process will provide a good opportunity for Commissioners to work with members of the Council on planning issues. Commissioner Siess replied that the Comprehensive Plan does not deal with ordinances and variances that have come before the Commission which have not gone through such as yard parking, various cases over the years regarding firearms sale, and other issues. She feels that meeting yearly with the City Council would be a healthy thing for the Commission and the City. Commissioner Kocon suggested if Commissioners have agenda items to discuss with the Council, they could bring them forward as a Commission, put together an agenda and then determine when a joint meeting would be mutually convenient. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Lauer, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. All in favor, 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink Recording Secretary Page 9 of 9 From: Cameron Murray To: David Junker; Ted Kozlowski; Doug Menikheim Cc: Bill Turnblad; Abbi Wittman Subject: Zoning Text Amendment for a tobacconist stop - case 2017-043 - Just say NO Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 11:45:09 PM Tonight the Planning Commission approved the creation of a new category of store, a tobacconist shop, to be permitted (CUP) in the downtown business district. The applicant wants to sell high end tobacco; cigars and pipe tobacco, and have a smoking lounge. The city staff recommended against this, and I spoke against this, yet it was approved. Here is a link to the commission packet. This will be coming to your attention in November, but I won't be around then to voice my objection: I DO NOT think this ZAT should be created/approved. http://cityofstillwater.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php? view id=3&event id=963&meta id=55909 From the document, for a Zoning Text Amendment to be approved: City Code Section 31-205, Zoning Map and Zoning Text Amendment, indicates amendments may be made when public necessity, the general community welfare and good zoning practice permit the amendment. The following findings must be made before an amendment to the zoning map or text is made: ■ That the public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered; and • That the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. I spoke on the first point; that a tobacconist shop in NO WAY is a public necessity, NOR is the general community welfare furthered. This should have been a high bar for any business to jump over, the amending of the Zoning Code. But the Planning Commission disagreed stating: 1. It helped diversify the business downtown 2. The general welfare is furthered by bringing in more tax dollars. So now they have defined the bar for "public necessity and general community welfare" and it is quite low. Take a hypothetical example: should the City Council approve the ZAT and set the precedent with this low bar to cross; then I decide to get a ZAT next year for a Porn shop in the CBD. By the definition if this current ZAT is approved all I have to say is: 1. a Porn shop helps diversify the business downtown. Might even bring visitors during the winter 2. the Porn shop pays taxes. I use this extreme example on purpose. I have not looked into other regulations that might prevent a Porn shop, and I hope one never appears. Insert any legal but undesirable business for my example of Porn. The point is, the bar for amending the Zoning in the CBD should not be this low. Something currently not permitted downtown should REALLY have to be a public necessity and REALLY further the general community welfare before approving a ZAT. And "business diversity" and "paying taxes" don't qualify as being significant enough to approve this ZAT. I think you are setting a legally binding definition of public necessity and furthering of community welfare. You will not be able to refuse any ZAT request, unless you want the city to be sued. Also, The applicant says they want to cater to high end connoisseurs and have a smoking lounge. But once established there is no control by the city around what they sell, the State of MN does not recognize a "tobacconist" as being different that a tobacco shop. What about when they sell the business? There is no legal way to enforce the new owners to only sell high end product. The applicants portrayed a very positive view of their potential clients (rich) and tried to distance themselves from normal "tobacco" shop. I spoke against this proposal on another issue, second hand smoke coming from the store on the sidewalk outside and people having purchased a tobacco product now smoking immediately after leaving. Some commissioners thought this on street smoking is less likely because the applicant plans on having a smoking parlor, so users would not be smoking when they leave. But I disagree, the purpose of such a shop is to increase the density of smokers brought downtown, so either going in or out there will be more smoke in the area. In addition "high end" tobacco means cigars, and their stench is particularly obnoxious. In fact, the health aspects and implications are specifically a detriment to community welfare. City staff did not mention another issue of concern; fire safety in these old buildings. The existing wood is very old and dry. Lighting up tobacco in quantity is not a good idea. Also, should a building catch on fire, the close nature of adjacent buildings means a fire is hard to fight and causes immediate damage. I would strongly encourage city staff to ask the Fire Chief about this concern. Once the business gets established, even with a CUP, the city will be very reluctant to shut them down if they violate the conditions. City staff clearly outlines their health and safety concerns with adjacent businesses and residents. The applicant promised an shell to enclose the smoking lounge and a fancy HVAC system. But how will the city know if the system works to prevent all smoke incursion or know when it fails? What kind of testing is the city willing to require and possibly pay for to ensure the health of the public (and adjacent businesses) is protected? How often would this testing occur? Interestingly the applicant is not allowed to have a smoking lounge in their Osceola store, as Wisconsin laws do not permit. Unfortunately, currently, MN law does permit a smoking lounge if a store gets 90% of its revenue from tobacco. So, please include my comments in the packet for the November meeting for CASE 2017-043. I think the tobacconist ZAT SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED under any conditions. Cameron Murray 350 Main St. N Unit 346 Stillwater MN 55082 CPC 2017-43 CC: 11/07/2017 Applicant Proposal ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 31, ENTITLED ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING TOBACCONIST BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: 1. Amending Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding: Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco -related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate a walk-in, on-site humidor. 2. Alter Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by adding: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC - C BP- BP -CRD PA PWFD PROS Tobacco products, general, non - specialty; sale of P Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products P 3. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapter 31 shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 21st day of November, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk CPC 2017-43 CC: 11/07/2017 CPC Recommendation ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 31, ENTITLED ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING TOBACCONIST BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: 1. Amending Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding: Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco -related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate a walk-in, on-site humidor. 2. Alter Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by adding: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC - C BP- BP -CRD PA PWFD PROS Tobacco products, general, non - specialty; sale of P Tobacconist operation; sale of specialty tobacco products CUP 3. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapter 31 shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 21st day of November, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk CPC 2017-43 CC: 11/07/2017 Staff Recommendation ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 31, ENTITLED ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING TOBACCONIST BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: 1. Amending Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding: Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco -related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate a walk-in, on-site humidor. 2. Alter Section 31-325, Allowable Uses in Non -Residential Districts, by adding: ALLOWABLE USES ZONING DISTRICTS CA CBD VC - C BP- BP -CRD PA PWFD PROS Tobacconist operation CUP 3. Amending Section 41-2, Licensing of tobacco sales; possession and use by minors, Subd. 11, by adding: (8) Indoor sampling. It is a violation of this section for any retail tobacco shop, specialty tobacco products shop, or in any tobacconist operation proprietor to allow for tobacco sampling or the use of a tobacco related device indoors. 4. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapter 31 shall remain in full force and effect. 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 21St day of November, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL REPORT MEETING DATE: November 7, 2017 Parks Commission: October 23, 2017 Planning Commission: October 11, 2017 CASE NO.: 2017-48 APPLICANT: Anne Stanfield, representing Ecumen, and Pastor Dale Stiles, representing Our Savior's Lutheran Church LAND OWNERS: 1) Our Savior's Lutheran Church, 1616 Olive Street West 2) Daniel and Gretchen Smith, 114 Brick Street South REQUEST: 1) Final Planned Unit Development for the Current Phase, for Ecumen 2) Preliminary Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church: 2 lots 3) Final Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church: 2 lots 4) Special Use Permit for Senior Living Facility in the RA Zoning District LOCATION: 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West ZONING: RA - One Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Low Density Res. REVIEWERS: Public Works Director, Deputy Fire Chief, Building Official, Washington County Public Works/Transportation, Middle St. Croix WMO PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND Anne Stanfield, representing Ecumen, and Pastor Dale Stiles, representing Our Savior's Lutheran Church (OSLC), have submitted an application to develop a 15.01 acre site located at 114 Brick Street West and 1616 Olive Street South. In May, 2017, the City of Stillwater approved a Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) to allow for Senior Care Living Facilities to be a Specially Permitted Use (SUP) on parcels of land that are five acres in size or greater. Additionally, the City approved a Concept PUD for this development in August of this year. The site is made u of two existing parcels: ' FLU = Future Land Use as guided in the Comprehensive Plan PID Owner Area (acres) FLU' Zoning 1. 29-030-20-42-0042 Our Savior's Lutheran Church 11.43 LDR RA 2. 29-030-20-42-0001 Daniel and Gretchen Smith 3.589 LDR RA ' FLU = Future Land Use as guided in the Comprehensive Plan Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 2 of 16 Ecumen will be the owner and operator of a proposed Senior Care Living Facility and OSLC will continue to own their existing church structure on the site, which is proposed to be expanded in the future. The project is planned to be developed in two phases: • Current Phase: o Ecumen Stillwater: a 145 -unit senior living building (71 independent units, 35 assisting living units, and 36 memory care units with a reserve of 3 units to be added, if unit sizes allow) o Construction of all parking, drive and pedestrian improvements for the two PUD uses o Construction of all stormwater facilities • Future Phase: o Our Savior's Lutheran Church expansion The Planning Commission reviewed this request on October 11, 2017. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed this request on October 23, 2017. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting: 1) Final Planned Unit Development for the Current Phase: Ecumen Stillwater 2) Preliminary Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church: 2 lots 3) Final Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church: 21ots 4) Special Use Permit for Senior Living Facility in the RA, One -Family Residential Zoning District2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A. Background Only one of the two total Concept PUD phases are included in the current Final PUD review. The Current Phase contains the construction of Ecumen Stillwater, the largest building on the campus; the building will house independent living units, memory care units, assisted living units, as well formal and informal dining areas, a wellness center, and lounges and activity rooms. This phase will also entail the construction of all parking and drive areas, trail improvements, as well as the construction of all stormwater facilities. The future phase of the PUD is for Our Savior's Lutheran Church's expansion. OSLC will go through a Final PUD process at the time they are ready for development. 2 As per the Concept PUD approval, the Final PUD application for Our Savior's Lutheran Church will occur within ten years of the Concept PUD approval date. Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 3 of 16 B. PUD Purpose The purpose of a PUD is to provide a means to ensure variety, innovation and flexibility in the development of land and its improvements. Equally as important is the preservation of natural beauty, open space and recreational areas. The Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's project fulfills these purposes. C. Conditions of Conceptual PUD Approval On August 2, 2017 the City Council approved the original Concept PUD. The conditions of approval are listed and reviewed below. 1) A 5% reduction in the total number of parking stalls shall be permitted in the Final PUD. The total number of stalls is contingent on the density maximums and shall be determined utilizing the following ratios. (a) Memory Care/Assisted Living =1 space/5 units (b) Independent Living =1 space/1 units (c) Church =1 space/3 seats (d) Senior Care Living Facility Staff = 30 spaces The applicant has shown that a total of 317 parking spaces will be required at full buildout. The total combination of garage and surface stalls to be constructed with the Current Phase is 330. The applicant has demonstrated all 330 parking spaces are able to be met onsite. A shared access and parking agreement will be required. 2) A complete landscape plan, including the preservation of significant trees and crown cover, will be included at the time of Preliminary Plat and/or Final PUD. A tree removal and landscaping plan has been submitted. The Planning Commission directed the applicant to enhance the landscaping on property boundaries on the east and west to help buffer the facility from the single family residential. The applicant has updated the landscaping plan, as well as the tree preservation plan, based on the Planning Commission's discussion. 3) Copies of all covenants and easements relating to the provision, use and maintenance of common open space, parking and drive areas must be filed with the Final Plat. This requirement has not been fulfilled. The applicant is aware that prior to the release of the Final Plat by the City, these items must be submitted, reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. 4) Redesign of the parking lot drive lanes and northerly access for fire safety purposes will need to be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat and/or Final PUD. This has not been achieved. However, the Assistant Fire Chief has indicated this can be achieved at the time of development. 5) Prior to the submittal of the Preliminary Plat and/or Final PUD, and in conjunction with the City and Washington County, the applicant will determine if pedestrian and vehicular improvements will be required on all adjacent Right -of -Ways. This condition has been met. Greater detail is found in a subsequent section of this report. 6) Public land dedication may be used to fulfill public park and trail dedication requirements only if it is found acceptable by the Park Commission and the City Council at the time of the Preliminary/Final Plat review. Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 4 of 16 At their regularly -scheduled October 23 meeting, the Park and Recreation Commission determined a fee in lieu of park and trail dedication would be acceptable. 7) The applicant will work with the City Engineering Department to determine if upgrades to the lift station will be required. The cost of the study, as well as improvements required, will be the responsibility of the property owner. It has been determined upgrades will not be required. 8) Determination of all conservation, drainage and utility easements shall be determined and found acceptable by the City of Stillwater and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization prior to Final PUD submittal. This requirement has not been fulfilled. The applicant is aware that prior to the release of the Final Plat by the City, these items must be submitted for review and approval by the City Attorney. 9) Since there is no Concept PUD sunset clause for the Our Savior's Lutheran Church properties, this property will need to develop according to City standards and Best Management Practices in place at the time of development. However, regardless of the City development standards in place then, the planned church addition can be developed according to the foot print and location included in this Concept PUD. The applicant is aware of this condition. Furthermore, the applicant has requested City approval for this Development Phase and associated Special Use Permit to be valid for a period of two years. 10) The applicant shall explore modifying the design of the west side to reduce the massing of the building. The applicant has proposed a two-story mass on the westerly extensions of the building. The first 32' of the structure, adjacent to the residences on Deer Path, will be two story; the structure is proposed to be 22'-4" to the top of the flat roof and 28' to the top of the parapet. D. Signage Since the project site is zoned RA, One -Family Residential, no signage would be outright permitted in the zoning code. However, as this is not a single family residential development, a single monument sign for the development is reasonable. Since the Planning Commission meeting, a conceptual monument sign has been submitted. The externally lit, 6' tall, approximately 60 square foot sign is reasonable in this residential neighborhood. II. PRELIMINARY PLAT A. Overview The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat that shows the alteration of an existing lot line. While lot line adjustments that do not result in nonconforming parcels of land are traditionally administratively approved, the parcels have not been previously platted. Therefore, platting is required. The proposed preliminary plat will not result in the creation of any additional parcels of land and the newly defined parcels will conform to the zoning code. B. Civil Engineering Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 5 of 16 The City Engineer reviewed the plans and makes the following comments: 1. The following notes will need to be added to the plans. These may be submitted at the time of Grading Permit submittal. a. Sheet C.40: i. Install erosion control prior to tree removal. ii. Maintain 1.5' of separation between sewer and water on Brick Street. iii. Only one patch is permitted for the utility area. Patch must be constructed with 2.5" base, 1.5" wear course, and 6" of class 5 material. b. Sheet SW1.1: i. Install catch basin inlet protect at Brick and Myrtle Streets. c. Sheet C4.0: i. Call Stillwater Water Board (at 651-439-6231) for wet tap on Brick Street. 2. The following conditions of approval will be required: a. Prior to the release of applicable grading, right-of-way, and/or obstruction permits from the City, applicant will provide a traffic control plan on Brick Street for the applicable utility work. b. Prior to the release of the Final Plat from the City, the applicant will provide storm sewer and pond calculation to include volume control. Plans shall be reviewed and approved prior to the release. 3. While a development agreement will not be required, the applicant shall be responsible for paying water and sewer hookup charges for connections to the public infrastructure. This should be paid prior the release of a building permit from the City. C. Public Safety The Assistant Fire Chief reviewed the plans and makes the following comments: 1. The hydrants will need to be looped. The applicant will need to submit a revised utility plan depicting the looped design. This can be achieved at the time of site preparation. 2. The existing church parking lot striping plan, and proposed access to the Ecumen building does not allow for adequate apparatus turning. A parking lot striping plan that is in conformance with the subdivision regulations, Zoning Code, and that meets all public safety requirements will need to be submitted. 3. The westerly fire access will be sufficient. However, a maintenance agreement will need to be in place to ensure sufficient access. D. Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization Comments are not available yet from Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization (MSCWMO). It was anticipated submittal review comments would have been transmitted after the board of managers meet on October 12th; to the date of memo development, MSCWMO comments have not been recieved. The applicant Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 6 of 16 shall be required to meet any conditions set by MSCWMO for compliance with the watershed management plan. E. Natural Resource Protection and Landscaping General The proposed development occupies a site that currently contains a church and an (approximately) 200' radio tower. While a portion of the property is encompassed by a pond, 1.83 acres of wetlands and a wooded area, the majority of the site is flat and undeveloped. Wetlands As noted, the site includes an existing pond and 1.83 acres of delineated wetlands. A 30' non -disturbance buffer is required from the delineated edge of the wetland. An additional 20' structural setback is required from the edge of the 30' non -disturbance buffer. However, Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization allows for buffer averaging. This means that the applicant may conduct work in the non- disturbance zone if an adjacent area, of equal or greater size, is protected and if the structural setback is preserved. A 1,816 square foot area of the non -disturbance zone is proposed to be graded near the Northeast corner of the structure. Disturbance will not occur within 15' of the delineated wetland. The structure will not be located closer than 20' to the delineated wetland; in this instance, the structure will be located approximately 35' from the wetland. Conservation easements will be required to help ensure the protection of these natural resources and their associated buffer areas. Soils and Grading While the northern portion of the site is relatively flat, the grading plan (C3.0) calls for some significant earthwork to accommodate the creation of Ecumeri s entrance off of Brick Street, underground parking, and stormwater infiltration areas. The plan indicates topsoil will be stockpiled outside of building pad areas, roadways, and parking areas. However, a notation on the plan will also need to indicate stockpiling will occur outside of wetlands and wetland buffer areas. The plan does not state where or how the stockpiles are to be stored and protected from theft and contamination. Materials storage areas and worker parking areas need to be designated away from tree canopies and protected area boundaries. The City Forester recommends that a layer of wood chips (or other suitable materials) be spread in these areas to help absorb the compressing force of the vehicles on the soil's porosity and reduce mud. These wood chips would be removed by the contractor when progress so dictated. Page C1.0 calls for tree removals to include trees and all root structures, but, leaving existing root structures in the ground helps hold the soil in place and retards erosion. So where root removal is not essential, or where tree removal is proposed in the buffer zone, the root systems should stay in place. This is especially true along protected tree lines, property lines, bluff lines or where erosion may play a role. No trees may be removed in the wetland area. Any buffer zone that is disturbed is proposed to be reestablished. Tree Removals Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 7 of 16 The submitted tree survey indicates there are 203 trees on the property outside of those areas encompassed by the City's trail easement. A total of 35% of the significant trees are allowed to be removed before tree replacement is required. City code would permit 71 trees to be removed without having to be replaced. A total of 69 trees are proposed to be removed. Trees along the westerly property line, between the City trail and the property boundary are not proposed to be removed or disturbed. Removal is concentrated near the area of the new entrance off of Brick Street. Therefore, tree replacement is not required. When trees are being removed, industry Best Management Practices (BMPs) are to be followed. Equipment shall not enter protected shoreline zone or wetland buffers, unless noted on the plans; nor disturb any part of thereof with tree removing operations. Landscaping That said, the applicant is proposing to plant 161 new shade and evergreen trees and 23 ornamental trees. Given what we know about the dangers of creating monoculture landscapes, tree and landscape professionals try to adhere to the 5-10-15 rule. This says that forest health and diversity are inextricably linked. A healthy target is to have no more than 5% of one species, 10% of one genus, and 15% of one family in a given planting. While the applicant was proposing a high concentration of linden, black hills spruce, and Colorado blue spruce, a modified landscape plan has been submitted that includes more native species. The planting list is generally acceptable. However, a condition of approval will include review and approval of an updated landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to the release of the building permit. The Planning Commission directed the applicant to increase the plantings on the property's boundaries to help buffer the facility from adjacent single family residences. An updated landscaping plan shows a mix of Colorado Spruce, Austrian Pine, American Larch and White Pine along the western side of the existing trail as well as White Pine, White Oak, and Blue Spruce on the eastern property boundary. These planting are in addition to existing vegetation not proposed to be disturbed as well as ornamental trees, shrubs, and perennial plants and grasses proposed to be located around the building, adjacent to walkways and paths, as well as throughout the Ecumen site. F. Public Park and Trail Dedication The City's existing trail, from Olive Street West to Myrtle Street, will remain in place. While there has been discussion regarding the installation of a trail on Brick Street West, the neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the City's Trail Plan does show any new trails on or adjacent to this property. The Park and Recreation Commission discussed an onstreet, shared bike route on these two blocks of Brick Street but determined acceptance of a fee, in lieu of improvements, would be more beneficial to the City. As Washington County redevelops CSAH 5 in 2018, the pedestrian trail will continue to connect to the City's trail on the OSLC/Ecumen property. However, a 2014 study concluded that while sidewalks are recommended on both sides of the road between Pine Tree Trail and Deer Path, the installation is costly and is a low priority for Washington County. It is anticipated that if Washington County is to construct a sidewalk in this Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 8 of 16 location, it would be on the south side of the road. As no improvements are proposed for lands directly adjacent to the south side of this PUD Phase, consideration of a sidewalk extension from Deer Path to Brick on the north side of Olive should be made at the time of Final PUD for OSLC. Ordinance Standards Ordinance 963 establishes minimum public park and trail dedication requirements for all development. In cases such as this one where the Comprehensive Plan and park planning efforts do not identify a need for on-site parkland, a park dedication fee is required in lieu of a land dedication. Park Dedication Fee There is no established park dedication fee in Ordinance 963 for senior living facilities. The most similar fee may be for multiple -family projects, which requires $1,500.00 for each unit. However, the impact of a senior living project and an apartment building are not similar. Therefore, the Park Commission in similar cases reduced fees. If those reductions are also applied to this PUD, it would result in the following fees: Unit type Number of units Park usage Standard fee/unit Recommended fee/unit Recommended Total Memory care 36 0% $1,500 $0 $0 Assisted living 35 0% $1,500 $0 $0 Independent living 74 50% $1,500 $750 $55,500 TOTAL $55,500 The park and trail dedication fees will be due upon release of the final plat. Trail Dedication Fee In addition to the park dedication fee, Ordinance 963 also requires a trail dedication fee if a trail is not to be built and dedicated to the public. As indicated, above, no trail development is proposed or required. As with the park dedication fee, it is unlikely that the impact of the project's residents upon the public trail system will be in the same order of magnitude as a standard apartment building. Therefore, the Park Commission will consider recommending the following reduced fees: Unit type Number of units Memory care 36 Trail usage 0% Standard fee/unit $500 Recommended fee/ unit $0 Recommended Total $4,375 Assisted living 35 25% $500 $125 $0 Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 9 of 16 Independent living $500 $500 $37,000 TOTAL $41,375 The trail fees will be due upon release of the final plat. III. FINAL PLAT As explained in the preliminary plat section, the applicant is pursuing final platting at the same time as the preliminary plat. Typically, before a final plat may be submitted, all conditions for the preliminary plat need to be met. Since the applicant has elected to pursue preliminary and final platting at the same time, all conditions of the preliminary plat must be met prior to the final plat, grading or building permit release or included in a Development Agreement, if determined applicable by the City Council. IV. SPECIAL USE PERMIT A. Overview "Senior Care Living Facilities" are allowed on parcels of land that are greater than five acres in the RA - One -Family Residential zoning district with a Special Use Permit. Recognizing a need for this type of use in Stillwater, the City Council approved a Zoning Text Amendment in May, 2017. At that time, the Council reviewed potential properties for this type of use; the property at 114 Brick Street and 1616 Olive Street was identified as a potential Senior Care Living Facilities site. B. Regulations and Standards Sec. 31-207(d) of the City Code states that a Special Use Permit can be approved if the Planning Commission finds that: (1) The proposed use conforms to the requirements and the intent of the Zoning Ordinance, the Comprehensive Plan, and any relevant area plans. Zoning Ordinance - The following minimum dimensional standards are applicable: Site size: A standard PUD has to be on a parcel of at least three acres in side. For Senior Care Living Facilities in the RA - One Family Residential District, a project must be on a parcel of land that is five acres or greater. This project is on a property that is 15.09 gross acres. Density: While the property is guided for low density residential, which would allow for 4.4 single family residential units per acre (for a potential of 65 single family units), the zoning ordinance allows for higher density senior residential facilities by SUP in this zoning district. To that effect, density is Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 10 of 16 ultimately capped at the project's ability to meet all development controls (i.e. retain 50% open space, provide all onsite parking, meet or exceed required setbacks, etc.). The total density is approximately 9.45 units per acre. Setbacks: With a PUD there are no required internal lot line setbacks, except building separations as required by the Building Code. There are, however, required setbacks from the perimeter of the project. The Ecumen building is proposed to be located approximately 50' off of Brick Street and, at its closest point, 60' from the Myrtle Street/ CSAH 12 right-of-way. The setback required is 20' on both of these street -facing sides. The Ecumen building is proposed to be setback at least equal to twice the proposed building height, as required per the PUD regulations. The building is required to be located at least 67' from the westerly property line. The building is proposed to be located approximately 82' from the west property line. Impervious Coverage: The property currently contains 35.42% lot coverage; a total of 1.46% of the existing lot coverage is for the public trail across this property. The applicant has submitted a final buildout plan, to include the future expansion of OSLC, which accounts for a total of 34.88% impervious surface coverage. The RA Zoning District allows 30% maximum coverage. However, the PUD approach allows flexibility to this standard. As long as the stormwater is adequately treated, the 34.88% coverage is allowed. As 50% of the entire PUD is required to be preserved as open space, these areas should be encumbered by a scenic and conservation easement. Parking: At the time of full build out of OSLC, the property will be required to have a total of 317 parking spaces onsite. The applicant is proposing to construct 330 parking spaces now, though that number will be reduced to 317 at the time of OSLC expansion. A total of 234 surface stalls will be available to both parties while 83 stalls will be constructed underground. A shared parking and drive access and maintenance agreement will be required prior to the release of the final plat. Comprehensive Plan -the Comprehensive Plan's housing chapter encourages providing a range of housing opportunities for the aging and elderly dispersed throughout the community. As noted in the Concept PUD, this project helps fulfill the following policies and program goals while preserving a significant amount of private and public open space areas: Policy 4. Attempt to disburse assisted housing throughout the community. Policy 5. Locate assisted housing near transit lines and public parks. Policy 9. Utilize the Future Land Use map to designate residential sites appropriately located for a range of housing densities. Program 3: Attempt to meet regional lifecycle housing goals for the City of Stillwater. Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 11 of 16 The following implementation items of the Comprehensive Plan's Chapter three, Natural Resources, may be able to be met with this development: • Requiring protection of the natural resource areas. • Ensuring open space resource areas, including sensitive natural resource areas, are identified and incorporated into development design. (2) Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed. Architectural design - The project site is not located within the Neighborhood Conservation District, the Downtown Design Review District, or the West Business Park. Therefore, no architectural standards are mandated, nor is a review by the Heritage Preservation Commission required. None the less, architectural design is important to the City and its residents. The architectural elevations and exteriors have been submitted and meet or exceed City standards. The applicant has proposed a combination of brick, lap siding, and panel siding on all four sides. Lighting - A lighting plan has been submitted for the freestanding, landscape bollards, and wall sconces and pack lighting improvements. The illumination spillover is held at 0.0 luminaires at all perimeter property lines, which is required. Wall pack lighting will be shielded so that the source of the bulb will not be seen. Cut sheet details have been submitted for each of these exterior fixtures, highlighting both aesthetic considerations as well as glare potential. Mechanical - Most of the HVAC equipment is within the building as Magic-Paks or Package Terminal Air Conditioners (PTACs), self-contained heating and cooling units located in each residential unit. These types of units have flush -mounted venting systems that will be placed on the exterior of the building. The building's generator will be located near the underground garage access, in an enclosed space. Streets and Public Ways - The main entrance into the project would align with Ramsey Street West off of Brick Street; the Planning Commission has recommend Ramsey be a controlled intersection with the improvements required by the applicant. The applicant has provided a traffic study conducted by SRF, an engineering firm pre -approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments. City Engineer Sanders has determined the traffic study is sufficient. The traffic study determined the existing infrastructure in its current configuration will be able to accommodate the increased demand. Concerns about the intersections of Brick and Olive Street West, as well as Brick and Myrtle Street West, have been expressed. Accident reports indicate there have been ten accidents at each intersection in the last ten years. No accidents have occurred at Brick and Myrtle since 2012. However, there have been eight accidents at Brick and Olive since 2013; one accident involved a pedestrian. Of all accidents Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 12 of 16 at this intersection, 50% were attributed to environmental factors (glare, rain, hail, sleet etc.) and 40% occurred in the winter. A condition of PUD Concept approval was that the applicant would meet with the City and Washington County to determine if future improvements to Olive/Brick/Myrtle were necessary. In August, City staff and the applicant met with representatives of Washington County. It was determined that if the City wanted to pursue a left turn lane onto Brick from Olive, then the County would be willing to make the improvements as part of their CSAH 5 reconstruction project in 2018. However, the County notes this will require the removal of all on -street parking in the areas adjacent to the intersection. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan states the traffic volume on Brick Street does not warrant the expansion or redesign of the roadway. However, the plan suggests the City could stripe three, 12' lanes; Comprehensive Plan notes are attached for the Council's review. If this was implemented all off-street parking would be lost. The 2008 Plan is in conflict with the City's Master Trail Plan which calls for a shared bike route on Brick Street. Additionally, as Brick is a state -aided road, the design could accommodate one lane of parking, two lanes of traffic, a boulevard and a sidewalk. As it has been identified there are perceived concerns regarding the traffic volume and flow in this area, that traffic will increase in the future, and that there are minor improvements that could have occurred but have not been implemented since the adoption of the existing comprehensive plan, the City should explore comprehensive roadway reconfigurations for West Olive and Brick Streets concurrently. If the City were to pursue these options, it should hold separate public hearings to determine whether it is appropriate to move forward with roadway reconfigurations in this area. Requiring the applicant to install improvements not consistent with City -adopted plans is not customary. (3) The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Public Comment - The City has received public comments, citing potential nuisances and public welfare concerns: Barb and Jim Ylinen (201 Deer Path) expressed concerns for the increase in density, proximity to existing properties, the overall size and scope of the project as well as the potential for decreased property values. Density, setbacks, and the size of structure have been previously addressed in other sections of this report. Regarding the concern of decreased property values, staff has no concrete evidence to support or contradict these statements. Regardless, understanding the concern of the adjacent property owners, staff discussed this with Washington County Assessor's Office staff who indicated there is a myriad of factors that determine the valuation of a home at the time of sale. Some of the largest factors have to do with the age of the Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 13 of 16 home, the condition of the residence and property (including how well it has been maintained, as well as the age and condition of properties adjacent to it). When asked specifically about Senior Care Living Facilities on this site, it was noted the use would be looked at similarly to the existing tower. When asked of the impact Boutwell landing's four-story structure has had to the valuation of adjacent homes, it was indicated the impact has not been negative to the adjacent single family residential homes. Mike Miskowiak (314 Hemlock Street South) has expressed concern for visible construction, loss of green space, increased traffic and noise, and light pollution. Traffic, noise and lighting have been previously address in other sections of this report. While construction can have a negative impact on the surrounding properties, the nuisance ordinance does protect the adjacent neighborhoods by limiting construction hours, requiring cleanup of debris on public lands, etc. In regards to the loss of green space, this is privately owned land that, although may have been treated as open space by the neighborhood, has a right to be developed by the property owner. As a PUD is proposed, and 50% of the property must remain in dedicated open space, a significant amount of green space is being preserved in this area. The location and the layout of the Senior Care Living Facilities puts minimal impact on neighboring properties while also accomplishing the City's goals of increasing housing options and varieties for the growing senior population, as highlighted in the Comprehensive Plan. All of the senior living facilities conform to height and bulk requirements for the district, as well as conform to the City's environmental protection regulations. With all of this in mind, staff has determined that with certain conditions, the senior care living facility as proposed would not be a detriment to the public on this site. ALTERNATIVES A. Approval. If the City Council finds the proposal to be in substantial conformance with the Special Use Permit, Final PUD, and Preliminary and Final Plat standards, it could recommend that the City Council conditionally approve the following with the adoption of the attached Resolutions. • Special Use Permit and Final Planned Unit Development for the Current Phase: Ecumen Stillwater, with the following minimum conditions of approval: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the plans on file with the Community Development Department, including those below, except as may be modified by the conditions herein. Plans listed without a sheet number or date, shall be consistent with those on file with Case No. 2017-48: a. Preliminary Plat 9/13/2017 b. Removals Plan C1.0 10/27/2017 c. Tree Inventory and Removal Plan 10/6/2017 d. Site Plan C2.0-2.1 10/27/2017 e. Grading Plan C3.0 10/27/2017 f. Utility Plan C4.0 10/27/2017 g. Landscape Plan L1.0-1.1 10/27/2017 Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 14 of 16 h. Stormwater Pollution Presentation Plan SW1.0-1.5 10/27/2017 i. Exterior Building Elevations j. Garage Level Plans k. 1st Floor Plans 1. 2nd Floor Plans m. 3rd Floor Plans n. Lighting & Photometrics 9/13/2017 o. Final Plat 9/14/2017 2. Prior to the release of applicable grading, right-of-way, and/or obstruction permits from the City, applicant will provide a traffic control plan on Brick Street for the applicable utility work. 3. Prior to the release of the Grading Permit from the City, the following shall occur: a. The following plan notes will need to be made: i. Sheet C3.0: 1. Stockpiling will occur outside of wetlands and wetland buffer areas. 2. A layer of wood chips (or other suitable materials) be spread in these areas to help absorb the compressing force of the vehicles on the soil's porosity and reduce mud. These wood chips would be removed by the contractor when progress so dictated. ii. Sheet C4.0: 1. Install erosion control prior to tree removal. 2. Maintain 1.5' of separation between sewer and water on Brick Street. 3. Only one patch is permitted for the utility area. Patch must be constructed with 2.5" base, 1.5" wear course, and 6" of class 5 material. 4. Call Stillwater Water Board (at 651-439-6231) for wet tap on Brick Street. iii. Sheet SW1.1: 1. Install catch basin inlet protect at Brick and Myrtle Streets. b. Plan amendments will need to be made: i. Sheet C2.0 or C3.0: 1. Identification of material storage and worker parking areas away from tree canopies and protected area boundaries. ii. Sheet C4.0: 1. Hydrants will need to reflect a looped design. iii. L1.0 and L1.1: 1. The replacement species must be approved by the City Forester and included in a revised landscaping plan 4. Prior to the release of a Building Permit, the following shall occur: a. Water and sewer hookup charges shall be paid. b. A parking lot striping plan that is in conformance with all subdivision regulations, the Zoning Code, and that meeting all public safety requirements shall be submitted, reviewed and approved. 5. When trees are being removed, industry Best Management Practices (BMPs) are to be followed. Equipment shall not enter protected shoreline zone or wetland Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 15 of 16 buffers, unless noted on the plans; nor disturb any part of thereof with tree removing operations. 6. When sign permits are requested for each of monument signs, detailed location maps must be submitted with application materials, and all required setbacks from property lines and public right-of-ways will need to be maintained. 7. The fire access lane will need to be flagged after construction and into perpetuity as per the Fire Department's specifications. 8. All public utilities that are located on privately owned property will need to be encumbered by drainage and utility easements. 9. The applicant shall be required to meet any conditions set by MSCWMO for compliance with the watershed management plan. 10. The Ecumen Stillwater PUD Phase approval shall be extended to two years from the date of City Council approval. • Preliminary Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church: 2 lots, with the following minimum conditions of approval: 1. Prior to the release of the Final Plat from the City, the applicant shall: a. Submit for review and approval by the City Attorney copies of: i. All covenants and scenic and conservation easements relating to the provision, use and maintenance of common open space including wetlands and wetland buffer areas. ii. Conservation, drainage and utility easements, determined and found acceptable by the City of Stillwater and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. iii. A cross access, use and maintenance agreement for all shared parking and driveway areas. b. Enter into an agreement with the City for access, use and maintenance of the City owned trail to ensure upgrades and year-round fire department access is achieved. c. Shall be responsible for payment of all required park and trail fee -in -lieu, as determined by the Park and Recreation Commission. ■ Final Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church: 2 lots B. Table If the City Council finds the proposal to be incomplete, it could table the review for additional information. C. Denial If the City Council finds the proposal to be inconsistent with the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Plan, it could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. RECOMMENDATION The revised Concept PUD, Preliminary Plat, signage plan, SUP, Final PUD, Final Plat are in general conformance with the Zoning Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Subdivision regulations of the City of Stillwater. The development represents a good solution to the need for Senior Care Living Facilities in the City while balancing the density envisioned by the Case 2017-48 CC: 11/7/2017 Page 16 of 16 Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval with the conditions listed in Alternative A. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative (including parking and wetland calculations) Survey Removals Plan (include tree inventory and tree removal plan) Site Plans Turning Diagrams Grading Plan Utility Plan Stormwater Management Report SWPPP Plans Soils Report Tree Survey and Removal Schedule Landscape and Tree Planting Plan Floor Plans and Exterior Elevations Neighborhood View Renderings Mechanical Details Concept Monument Sign Lighting Plan and Specifications Traffic Study Public Comments (4) Draft Planning Commission Minutes Draft Park and Recreation Commission Minutes Resolution: Preliminary Plat Approval Resolution: Final Plat Approval Resolution: SUP and Final PUD Approval cc: Anne Stanfield Pastor Dale Stiles Mike Isensee, MSCWMO CC MyRT<F r ' STR�c . 1 ' 4 r -I ti 4 . ) WO CC S 1 '9 "lhOff, IOW9�ae4. 3- -. ...- -9,\ v SUNNYSLOPE LA t ! _� T - WEST MYF 4 v Cli i_ The 114 Brick go Birthplace I Is < irk 4-,-. iv. 1 I'_'_ E CI of Minnesota Street South F,i, PPHN G , ill Lc F -°' ii ,.., —Firm-toolSite U RAMSE` 1616 Olive Street West Location Map CI Subject Properties a', .. 11.1 1902 Q a , .'m WEST __ f O CO Parcel Boundaries w..- Municipal Boundary r--- WEST OLIVE STREET CSAH 5 _ e - 0 180 360 720 Feet - General Site Location _ ----__I D - �� _ i i%;. t Mgr wT r i I i Ilifir ' �r NO I L..r. Y p •**" rte.•'—` :1'.. .,......77,7 1 11 f*-:, * 11.P._..— J `........�...� rc' �� N. —.:. � `w iMit..,. .,, l m. ..d. - ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH NARRATIVE FOR FINAL PUD, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR ECUMEN SENIOR LIVING CARE FACILITY STI LLWATE R, MN September 15, 2017 ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PUD, SUP, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPLICATION INTRODUCTION / REQUEST Ecumen and Our Savior's Lutheran Church (OSLC) are pleased to submit this application for Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), Special Use Permit (SUP), Preliminary and Final Plat to allow for a new Senior Living Care Facility and a future Church Expansion on 15.0 acres at 1616 West Olive Street and 114 Brick Street. The Concept PUD for this project was approved on 8/2/2017 (CPC CASE #2017-25). The proposed Senior Living Care Facility would provide up to 145 housing units. The current proposal includes 142 units: 71 Independent units, 35 Assisted living units and 36 Memory Care units. Ecumen would own and operate the senior living community. Ecumen is under contract to purchase two contiguous properties: 114 Brick Street (current location of the AM radio tower for KLBB radio) and approximately 6.4 acres at 1616 West Olive Street (land which is currently undeveloped and owned by OSLC). OSLC would retain the remainder of their property and continue to operate the Church in an enhanced campus environment adjacent to Ecumen's new senior living community. We are requesting permit approvals to be extended from 6 months (city standard) to 2 years. Consideration has been made in this request for a future expansion of Our Savior's Lutheran Church at 1616 West Olive Street. OSLC plans to add an approximately 9,600 sf sanctuary. The timing of this project is a minimum of 10 years into the future. OSLC received Concept PUD approval at 8/2/17 City Council meeting and is not seeking Final PUD approval at this time. PROJECT BACKGROUND Ecumen, a leading national non-profit senior housing provider, was approached by OSLC after the adjacent property owner of KLBB radio inquired about OSLC's interest in purchasing their land. The OSLC board considered senior housing to be a good fit as a potential future use of the site as such a community would be an extension of OLSC's commitment to service and would create great synergies. OSLC was aware of Ecumen's 150+ year history of serving those in need and believed Ecumen would be an ideal partner to realize an expansion of the Church campus to include housing for seniors in Stillwater. Based in Shoreview, Ecumen operates in 37 cities and 7 states, with the majority of its communities in Minnesota. Dedicated to empowering individuals to lead richer, fuller lives, Ecumen prides itself on innovation and radically changing the way aging is viewed and understood. As a long-term owner and operator of its communities, including locations in MN which have been under ownership for over 100 years, Ecumen is committed to enhancing the broader communities in which it operates. OSLC also has a 150+ year history, all within the City of Stillwater. The Church was established in Stillwater and has served this community from its inception. OSLC has been at 1616 Olive Street since 1961. The OSLC congregation is currently comprised of approximately 900 members, the majority of which are Stillwater residents. Given this unique opportunity to partner with OSLC, Ecumen has entered into contracts with OSLC and the KLBB property owner to purchase land. The goal of this partnership is to create a project that enhances the community with a building that complements the Church and adjacent homes and by providing a new home for Stillwater's seniors, a segment of the population that is currently underserved with limited housing options. In advance of this application, Ecumen requested a Zoning Text Amendment to allow for Senior Living Care Facilities in the RA district for sites 5 acres or greater by special use permit which was approved by City Council on May 16, 2017 (CASE #2017-07). 1 ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PUD, SUP, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPLICATION PROJECT OVERVIEW Ecumen's new senior living community will provide a range of housing options for individuals and couples 55+ under one roof. While a resident's health needs may change, offering Independent, Assisted and Memory Care housing options in one building allows residents to age in place. In addition to rental housing, the new building will provide common spaces available to residents and Church members including formal and informal dining venues, a wellness center, lounges for social gathering and activity rooms for larger group meetings and programs. There will be direct pedestrian connections to the Church which will facilitate safe passage between the two buildings and encourage intergenerational engagement between the residents of Ecumen's building, the Church's congregation, youth ministry and daycare. A focus on wellness and intergenerational engagement extends to the site design as well. Ecumen will provide walking paths that connect to the city's existing walking trails, an outdoor picnic area, park benches, and an open field for larger group recreation and gatherings. These amenities will serve the residents of Ecumen's building and the 900 members of the Church as well. The proposed campus and building design coupled with the rich programming and quality care that will be offered will facilitate active and healthy lifestyles for seniors in Stillwater, bolster residents' physical and psychological health and enhance their engagement with the community. FINAL PUD SITE / BUILDING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS We are requesting Final PUD approval for a Senior Living Care Facility for up to 145 units at 114 Brick Street. Concept PUD approval was granted and a Zoning Permit has been issued (Case No 2017-25). Site Access Site access will be off of Brick Street and will align with Ramsey Street; this will result in a standard 4 -way street intersection. Zoning Requirements All dimensional standards for the new building are in compliance with the requirement in the RA zone. Additionally, all PUD requirements are met for both the new planned Senior Living Care Facility and the future expansion at OSLC. Maximum Lot Coverage Proposed Ecumen Building Existing OSLC Church Building Proposed Ecumen Impervious (Paving) Existing OSLC Impervious (after sale) 57,848 s.f. 31,908 s.f. 64,497s.f. 74,382 s.f. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS (BUILDINGS/PAVING) 228,635 s.f. Existing PUD Site Size (Ecumen & OSLC) 656,946 s.f. (15.08 acres) MAX IMPERVIOUS (BUILDING + PAVING) ALLOWED = 50% in PUD TOTAL IMPERVIOUS (BUILDING + PAVING) BOTH SITES = 34.8% 2 ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PUD, SUP, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPLICATION *If the church were to expand, the total impervious between the both sites considered in this PUD application would increase to 36.3%. (1.5% increase from existing church property after sale + proposed Ecumen property). This would still be well within the allowable impervious surface under the PUD. Maximum Building Height Ecu men Building Setbacks 35' allowed 33'-6" proposed The proposed building meets all setback requirements for the RA zone and PUD. To the north, the building is beyond the 25' wetland buffer from the wetlands that comprise the northern portion of the site. Wetland buffer averaging has been utilized for the limited section of the building that is within the full building structure setback beyond the 25' wetland buffer. To the west, the building footprint steps back in response to the angled property line in an effort to maximize the distance between the building and adjacent properties. It is a minimum of 70.3' from the western property line, which exceeds the PUD requirement of building setback being twice the height of the building. Revised Massing To minimize the visual impact of the Senior Living Care Facility from the adjacent homes on Deer Path, the top ends of the two wings of the building closest to the West property line have been lowered from 3 stories to 2 stories (33'-6" to 22'-4"). To achieve the reduced mass, two units were removed from the top floor of each wing (the step back at the 2 -story portion is 24'-32' deep, with the 32' distance being at the end bay for the 2 -story portion) and have reduced the overall density of the building. Residential Design This project is appropriate for the site, as the building is residential in character and in the way that it functions (e.g. it is not an office building, industrial use, etc.). Residential building materials including brick and cement fiber board lap and panel siding will be used to complement OSLC's brick facades and the adjacent, lap sided single family homes. We have selected a color palate of soft and light neutral tones, and have enhanced building design details to include trellises, arches and columns to relate to the suburban, residential neighborhood of Stillwater. In response to feedback from neighbors on Deer Path, we have relocated balconies to the north and south sides of the building in order that they do not face directly into the back yards of the homes on the shared west property line. Landscape All existing healthy trees on site not needed to be removed for grading, construction of the building, or creation of site storm water infiltration basins will remain, and additional trees and landscaping will be incorporated throughout the site to provide screening and enhance visual appeal. A combination of fast growing deciduous and coniferous trees are proposed for the west side of the site to maximize screening impact to adjacent homes year- round. The existing walking path at the west side of the property will remain, as this is valuable amenity to the neighborhood, the senior residents, and the Church community. Additionally, a large, green open space has been maintained between the senior living building and the Church, as well as on the north side of the senior living building to create outdoor spaces for gathering and recreation, for use by both the Church and residents. 3 ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PUD, SUP, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Site Lighting The majority of site lighting will be at the driveway and parking lot for safe site circulation. The senior building wraps around the new parking area, which will effectively shield the majority of sightlines to parking lot lighting from neighboring homes. A site photometric study is attached. Parking A total of 153 parking spaces will be provided on the Ecumen property; 83 in the below grade secured garage, and 70 surface spots on the Ecumen parcel. This provides adequate parking for residents, staff and visitors, and complies with the parking ratios set forth by city staff in the conditions of approval at the Concept PUD stage. The proposed parking stall count meets both the current proposal and accommodates the future needs of the Church if they should expand. The surface parking on the Ecumen site will be connected by a drive aisle to the Church's existing west parking lot, and will function as overflow parking for OSLC. Ecumen and OSLC will prepare mutual parking agreements and access easements. Total parking stalls provided for both sites is 330. See attached Sheet C2.1 for a detailed parking analysis with total site stall counts including the Church. Storm water Management Storm water is managed on site through a series of infiltration basins located on the East and North sides of the site. Storm water will be handled on site per the PUD requirements of the city and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. Ecumen and the design team has met with city staff and the Middle St. Croix WMO to discuss the project, and understand that future easements may be required at the time of permitting. Wetlands The wetland delineation completed by Midwest Natural Resources identified four wetlands on the south side of the site along Myrtle Street. There are no proposed modifications or impacts to the wetlands, and the plan complies with the required wetland buffers. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Study was completed by SRF in May 2017 for the proposed design and is included in this submission. The study concluded that "no significant approach delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation" as a result of our project. Additionally, "the proposed site plan including access and circulation is generally well considered." SRF conducted a follow up traffic study in September 2017, in order to verify the traffic impact of the new St. Croix River Bridge at this site. The results illustrated that the anticipated traffic reduction on both Olive and Myrtle Streets were in fact greater than initially estimated (16% and 8% reductions respectively); thus the "traffic operations at the study intersections may be better than was identified" in the initial study. In conclusion, the traffic study states that "the City of Stillwater may consider the proposed Ecumen Stillwater Senior Housing Development without concern that it would represent a significant negative traffic impact on the supporting study area roadways." Streets & Other Public Ways The Ecumen team met with the City and Washington County to discuss pedestrian and vehicular improvements as a result of this project. It was determined that no improvements were required on adjacent right-of-ways. 4 ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PUD, SUP, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Public Safety The Fire Department has reviewed and commented on the proposed fire access plan. The proposed fire apparatus access lane has been designed to meet the requirements of the International Fire Code. Deliveries / Trash All deliveries and trash pick-up will utilize the loading zone adjacent to the garage vehicular entrance located on the southeast portion of the site. Studies have been performed to ensure that delivery vehicles and trash trucks should be able to utilize the proposed drive areas of the parking lot to turn around and exit back out to Brick Street without having to travel through the site or through the adjacent church parking lot. Anticipated regular deliveries/pick-up consist of a weekly food delivery, and a weekly trash pick-up. Deliveries of other items, such as housekeeping supplies and other items, will occur periodically but not with great frequency. All trash is collected in dumpsters within enclosed trash rooms at the garage level, and wheeled out of the garage only on trash pick-up days. SPECIAL USE PERMIT / PROJECT BENEFITS We are requesting approval for a Special Use Permit for a Senior Living Care Facilities in the RA district for 10.77 acre site. This use is allowed by SUP in the RA district for sites 5 acres or greater. The design for the new Senior Living Care Facility complies with all SUP requirements and the project provides benefits not only future residents of the Senior Living Care Facility, the OSLC community but to the greater Stillwater community as well. Criteria for SUP permits (in italics) and benefits of this proposal are outlined below: 1. The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of the zoning regulations, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations; This project meets all zoning regulations for the RA district and supports Stillwater's Comprehensive Plan. Within Chapter 4 (Housing) of the Comprehensive Plan, Goals 1 and 2 call for "...planning for a range of new housing opportunities" and "providing a balanced choice of housing types and densities, suitable to a wide range of demographic groups, with a focus on life cycle housing." The objectives of this chapter also support development of higher density infill, encouragement of housing for a range of age levels, and use of the planned unit development process for reviewing innovative development concepts and protecting natural resource areas As stated in the Staff report for Concept PUD Approval: The Comprehensive Plan's housing chapter encourages the provision of a range of housing opportunities for aging in the community and for the elderly. This PUD helps fulfill the following policies and program goals while preserving a significant amount of private and public open space areas: Policy 4. Attempt to disburse assisted housing throughout the community. Policy 5. Locate assisted housing near transit lines and public parks. Policy 9. Utilize the Future Land Use map to designate residential sites appropriately located for a range of housing densities. Program 3: Attempt to meet regional lifecycle housing goals for the City of Stillwater. 2. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed; 5 ECUMEN & OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PUD, SUP, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPLICATION This proposal meets all 10 conditions of the Concept PUD Approval as determined by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council as a result of project review, Staff reports and public hearings. 3. The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. This project benefits the public welfare of Stillwater by: Providing Housing Options Seniors to Stay in Stillwater Currently the residents of Stillwater do not have many senior living options in the community in which they live, and often move to adjacent communities for this type of housing opportunity. Market demand for this type of building, regardless of where it is located, often demonstrates that most residents come from a fairly small radius around the building, as residents want to stay close to their friends and family, as well as the city amenities that they enjoy. Based on a 2015 Census Bureau American Community Survey Data, seniors occupy 23% (or 1,275) of the single family homes in Stillwater. As seniors move out of their homes into a senior living building, their former homes are opened up for new families moving to the area. Addressing Market Need / Demand 65+ population in the market area, which includes Stillwater and adjacent communities, is projected to grow over 30% in the next 5 years. By 2021, Stillwater's senior population will increase by approximately 1,500 bringing the total senior population in Stillwater to over 3,700 residents. Currently, there are only 228 nursing home beds in Stillwater to support this population and no options for Active Adult Rentals, Independent Living with some services, Assisted Living or Memory Care in the City of Stillwater. While options are available in Oak Park Heights, Oakdale, Mahtomedi, Woodbury, and White Bear Lake there is a gap within Stillwater of providing a variety of housing options for an aging population. This project address this gap and demand in Stillwater for Independent, Assisted and Memory Care housing. Creating New Jobs in Stillwater Ecumen is recognized as a top employer, having been named "Best Places to Work" ten times by the Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal and one of Minnesota's Top Workplaces by the Minneapolis Star Tribune and Minnesota Monthly Magazine. The proposed Senior Living Care Facility will create new jobs in the City of Stillwater for the equivalent of 50 full time employees from nursing staff to housekeeping, culinary to administrative roles. Providing Tax base on land that is currently tax exempt Ecumen will pay real estate taxes on its 10.77 acres of land of which approximately 7.18 acres, currently owned by OSLC, is exempt from real estate taxes. This tax income will benefit Stillwater and the State of Minnesota. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT We are requesting approval for a preliminary and final plat to create two lots. Lot 1 is 4.24 acres and will be owned by Our Savior's Lutheran Church. Lot 2 is 10.77 acres and will be owned by Ecumen. 6 116 PARKING ANALYSIS 9.15.2017 as wi Isan a rch itect OSLC - church site Current sanctuary seats 36 Current parking required 36 Current SE/SW parking stalls 177 Future expansion sanctuary seats 650 Future expansion parking required 217 Future expansion parking available on church site 164 Ecumen - senior living site MC units 36 AL units 36 IL units 73 MC/AL parking required (1:5) 14 IL parking required (1:1) 73 TOTAL RESIDENT PARKING REQUIRED 87 Max. anticipated staff @ shift change 30 TOTAL ECUMEN PARKING DEMAND 117 Ecumen garage stalls 83 Ecumen site stalls 70 TOTAL ECUMEN PARKING AVAILABLE 153 COMBINED OSLC (w/ expansion) AND ECUMEN PARKING DEMAND 334 REQUIRED PARKING (REDUCED BY 5% FOR SHARED PARKING) 317 TOTAL Ecumen (gar/surf.) stalls + church existing (no exp.) 330 TOTAL site parking at time of church expansion (future) 317 SURFACE PARKING - OSLC w/ expansion + Ecumen 234 (117/sw lot, 58/SE lot) (short 53 stalls, but shared surface parking w/ Ecumen site) *+ 11 proof of parking available * "excess" of 36 stalls, without 11 proof of parking stalls required at time of expansion PROVIDED at this time PROVIDED at church future expansion * This surface parking exceeds OSLC (w/expansion) parking demand by 9 stalls TOTAL AREA 656945.8 SF (M) WETLAND A 2,586.19 SF (M) WETLAND B 19,236.84 SF (M) WETLAND C 859.9 SF (M) WETLAND D 57,074.67 SF (M) TOTAL 79,757.60 SF (M) ECUMEN, STILLWATER SEN ARCHITECT KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS 1301 AMERICAN BLVD E BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 612-879-6000 DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER: ECUMEN 3530 LEXINGTON AVE N SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 651-766-4300 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: ACRE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE, SUITE 100 BLAINE, MN 55449 763-458-2997 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: INTERTEK PSI, INC. 2915 WATERS ROAD, SUITE 112 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 651-646-8148 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ISSUED FOR: CITY RESUBMITTAL MASTER LEGEND: • -- 1125 - X 1137.12 1137 41.26 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS EOF=1135.52 EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL DRAINAGE ARROW EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ■ SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SOIL BORING LOCATION CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) > EXISTING MANHOLE EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY PROPOSED SIGN PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE J EXISTING STOPBOX ►ti EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX EXISTING LIGHT A EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING GAS VALVE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL SHEET NUMBER 00.0 00.1 C1.0 C1.1 C2.0 C2.1 C2.2 C2.3 C3.0 C4.0 C5.0 C5.1 C5.2 L1.0 L1.1 SW1.0 SW1.1 SW1.2 SW1.3 SW1.4 SW1.5 OR SHEET INDEX SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SITE SURVEY REMOVALS PLAN TREE PROTECTION PLAN SITE PLAN OVERALL SITE PLAN TURNING DIAGRAM - TRASH TRUCK TURNING DIAGRAM - FIRE TRUCK GRADING PLAN UTILITY PLAN DETAILS DETAILS DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE NOTES SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SWPPP - DETAILS SWPPP - NARRATIVE SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS G3 O M �� Civil Engineering ° Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 V lk 1L A 1- 0 w 0 re z 0 J co 1_ 0 W O 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE 06/16/17 09/15/17 10/27/17 DESCRIPTION CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CITY RESUBMITTAL DATE REVISION SUMMARY DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 TITLE SHEET C0.O ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ALTA/ACS LA TITLE SURVEY PROPERTY ADDRESS: #114 Brick Street So., Stillwater, MN 855.8 18•HOp 687 r .. 1 •-1- 1 /'.l - I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 v \t 1 1.... 4f 1 r . J By6• J 85f - 55� a 55916 r 855.2 855.3 g60.2 860 60, k7• 5 FOUND Nita PID# 29-030-20-42-0001 LEGA L DESCRIPTION: (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) All that part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, a distance of 1081.51 feet West of the Southeast corner of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, said point being the Northeast corner of Block 15 of McKinstry and Seeley's Addition to the City of Stillwater; thence West on the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, a distance of 510.43 feet to a point; thence North and parallel with the West line of Brick Street in said City a distance of 309.5 feet; thence East and parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, a distance of 510.43 feet to the West line of Brick Street; thence South along the West line of Brick Street, a distance 309.5 feet to the place of beginning, Washington County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) 1093 5 g3. X862. 5 S65 8621 x ee 5515 9 sss.s 56 5 61.9 860 Oso BSA 657 3 • 58.4 %852.5 62.9 ,.g:0 0sw1,. 'S54.6 ; c8 A14854..8 - 559.3• 6 8.51•4 5 8554 3 858. 851' 857 N 15`1562 4O°W1'k 005 EXISTING POND 681A- NWL=856.2 i3514 H WL= 860.5 651 36gGP FZI 55.1 854.9 854.8 4. 855.1 55. ;362.1 '•. • .. xi6. x5655 .658.; 887; 85 57.4 631 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE SURVEY C0. 1 50 GRAPHIC SCALE 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. NORTH SCHEDULE B-2 SURVEY RELATED EXCEPTIONS: *NOTE: BELOW EXCEPTION f'S CORRESPOND TO EXCEPTION .#'S LISTED IN TITLE COMMITMENT* 9. Easement for electrical transmission purposes and incidental rights in favor of Northern States Power Company as contained in Easement dated February 17, 1949, recorded Febn.rary 21, 1949 in Book 169 of Deeds, Page 6 as Document No. 155252. (AFFECTS PROPERTY, THIS IS A BLANKET EASEMENT) Partial Release of Easement dated November 7, 1988, recorded December 14, 1988 as Document No. 589804. (SHOWN ON SURVEY, AFFECTS SITE. POINT OF BEGINNING I5 AMBIGIOUS AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS ON WHERE TO BEGIN EASEMENT. THIS EASEMENT WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE VACATED FOR PROPOSED FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS.) 10. Terms, conditions and easement as contained in Warranty Deed dated February 10, 1949, recorded March 1, 1949 in Book 169 of Deeds, Page 11 as Document No. 155331. (AFFECTS PROPERTY, IS VAGUE AND BLANKET IN NATURE, WILL NEED TO BE VACATED FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED) 860.4 B5° $51.7 8 859. 858.6 2p 86 6 0 '86 86 858.5� �858.6 63 g 857 4 rtb. 856.7`"•. :.... y,863 563.1 62.6 65 859h ;$60.1' ... , B62„8 • 861.7 . 86'.5 .. a6 8 61 6 ,, s $ 86 567' •• 8�h.,a.6 859.5 881.4 853.2 4 x$86........ ...... 854.4 854.5 8 2..........., g63,6 854.5;.9 S6:G5p,085 'w 59.5 11, 1859:5 859.% 859.8 0.7 54.9 6,'1 0.2 xg81.0 e e �5 63 3 411461‘. 6.606 3.6 T:J LEGEND • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE © DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE Cl DENOTES CATCH BASIN DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT DENOTES STORM SEWER J DENOTES GAS METER/BOX Er DENOTES UTILITY BOX DENOTES RETAINING WALL x DENOTES EXISTING FENCE DENOTES STREET LIGHT DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC T DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE DENOTES WATERMAIN DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE PER 05/24/2002 SURVEY BY MFRA DENOTES TREEL1NE 9.4 863.8 0 DENOTES SOIL BORING fors,883.1 el 860.2 63 859.9 864.0..818.46 2 86 8529 59.9 6 60.2 5.5 FOUND 1/2" IR' 813-4 FOU144 1 /2" IR 873:4 55. 0x 5501 BSC\4 i 881.0 -15,5 S56°-9 6 91. piPE g T•. 8°.2 x661.6 y.5132,3 x g62,2 81.6 x881 Cly x8615 0.3 S56° 681 5 x 68q 9 B19 6816 S562 4 x5512' x863............ 883.9:'.... •. , 1 ........ ";x 88.8.9 .............. x2 g C ., .......7,6 X 8 86k.0 S. 591.g ' �•�c8`31'6 • S862-8 �� 4 s0-5 840 9.09 8 x881,.- x5 \88r '-8 66•° 1r g10861 861 8 eV 4 3'r 6g°• 135\ .2:* g81.2•' c 2 850.9 680 .9 N88°30'57"W l{w -. 858.8 s 8-9 59,4 559.4 8 62••7 621 g62.4 2.2 862 ° $61.81 pP. 8 FOUND RLS#10938- 01. 859. 9. 859.8 Ca 1-u FLOW= 860.7 INVS 856.85 1 8 2, .0 62. 3512 PP 881 1' 60.7 BEA. BEL I a-3., 861.4 SMH 1NV-12 860.5 CBFL INV -3.3 4 yr 882.0- 61 6 8619 ---60- re W - -i ':x 74-r7 uhf 1 1 '1 61.' el 1 { 1 859.5 x874 i ' U1 ITY EASEMENT PER DOC. 589804- II): 1 'd (SEE SCHEDULE 8-2 NOTES) 1 1 4.6 859.7 8;54 w 1 t• 4 ��� 1, V1, 858.5 ) i 1359.8 861. rooz859.7 59,3 859.5 tiluiP ,94,1 ci 1 5x._30 1 60.8x $61.5 861- -- 50.9 - --60-- 1 661.6 g61- 82.1 86 621 861.6 H Iu i 862 ..-.. x 862.5 86,- V -V g63.3 op 663- 2.8 x A3. 4 .1 60w .66 86-T 8g0 0 81.0 -'850•0 .5: S123+1 too 9.6 79.6 551.1 y EX. BLDG. s B15:1 RIM=861.36 INV.=849.36 117 861'1 6711 4.2 9.09 8620 8-18. Ri.s# 1508 850 82. 032. azu 515-1 SU RVE 5163 G\1 ID 64 564 5 ps 816. 76 575. 8353 81 121 64-6 664 6 517.3 816 6 816.8 EXISTING BUILDING 616-6 .4 630 8169 616'4 875:5 iDS /63 s 531 163 11.0 8113 Big bituminous 818' *cross onto adj. 6614.6 5.5 515. 875- 5/5 378'9 515-6 8176 14.4 ( 6:›7,9 i . BENCHMARK: TOP OF MANHOLE; 610 6693 S. 75, 5-11.5 511.2 511 8169 2.6 eV- 514 sn 73-8 to 05,4 575-3 610 1815-6 814 811 5. 81 -13.g 510 6/10 616 9 06-2 614.5 61-12.5 81-570 1 8669 - 69.5 7,50 610 5 0.5 LOW= 867 371'12r- 6iirsalts• mom. "I hereby certify to XXXXXXXX>0(XXXX ancl First American Title Insurance Company that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimurn Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes items XXXXXXXX and )000( of Table A thereof." The fieldwork was completed on 03/08/17 Date of Map: March 22nd, 2017 Eric R. Vickatyous, P.L.S. #44125 Ci\Users\erIcj\DneDrIve\CAD-1D\17076stillwater-Senlor-Koas\dwg\17076bndry-olta.dwg 5/9/2017 11124157 AM CDT FLOW-- 868.2 INV.=865.1 3* 12"(inv=7') WEST OLIVE TR 38. 06. CO NOTES: FLOV‘i= 868 65 INV =865.65 889 GV 1369 9 -70:6 5-1071 oh tk, 810- 810 SMH-INV7.3 6,10 L g-70•351.0.5 830- RI M=870.77 INV.=865.42* FLOW -=869.88 INV. 9,28 s-teA-1 1369-5 -Utilities shown hereon are observed. Excavations were not made during the process of this survey to locate underground utilities and/or structures. The location of underground utilities and/or structures may vary from locarions shown hereon and underground utilities and/or structures may be encountered. Contact Gopher State One Call Notification Center at (651) 454-0002 for verification of utility type and field location prior to excavation. - Title commitment used for survey per commitment NCS-633115-MPLS dated Feb. 10th, 2017. - Wetlands delineated by Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. in May, 2017 and located by Acre Land Surveying 05/04 7. JOB *17076 9 kik.CRE LAND SURVEYING 763-458-2997 acrelandsurvdystgmail.co Serving Twin Cities Metro area and beyond Fl 1,1 10 11 12 13 14 16 i7 IS 110 01 1:2 j13 11,t iss r 17 ra 119 .120 1 i 0 6.$ SH SMA22-2STEMS 3193 546.8 SMA38 3194 546.8 SMA15 3189 546.8 1110 3187 553.1 BE73182 548.6 P010 3181 548.6 P010 3191 546 WETLA � - 859.9q SF 3188 551.7 WI17 3179 5523 CRABS 3172 544.7 P09 8611 5 ASH1 3169 544,7 P❑9 _0 1 Z 85.5 FOUND 1/2" S77`5 ,00., idewalk - . sement, Sch. B-2, #19 20 46. 08 i 3178 552.3 CRA _Yeeloi *&i*❑7' r 1 44.6 07 31 3173 544.7 ,\II, P09 3STEMS 3176 542,2 3177 CH7 542.2 CRAB8 3140550, 3141 P087 544.4 / P06 3142 547. P09 TREE PROT., TYP. 46.3 09 4 313' .552 EXISTING STORM SEWER TO BE RE-ROUTED, REMOVE PER CITY STANDARDS, SEE UTILITY PLAN (C4.0) FOR PROPOSED LAYOUT 32 •48.9 3 557. 37P07 143 45.9 08 547,;, . BE 4.; v 3149 541.6 P06 3150 541.4 P07 3151 ''ti 552.2 P06 WETLAND AREA D 57,074.67 SF 3148 .54,7 '16 REMOVE EXISTING BENCH `IR MI kr EXISTING TRAIL TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED IN LIKE KIND AS PART OF UTILITY RE-ROUTE, TYP. COORD. w/ CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GRADIN LAND STUR NCE) IMIT, T . N8.°3 1'57 W CLEAR & GRUB ALL PLANT MATERIAL, INCLUDING ALL ROOTS (AS PRACTICAL) FOUND AND STUMPS. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM SITE. COORDINATE W/ GRADING & LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SITE PREPARATION AND RESTORATION, TYP. ti04#4, tte45 F 34- �17134,4p.®,1 304 t 40 4t 3859 9 044 859, �4�9,,,�~� I�v� WI3 WI12 '����'004* TY ETAS MEN -vitt ,.� SEE SC DU / I EXISTING � �t� 3058 860.1 CW25 F OPV=860.75 I '856.85 � M ,\11, 3058601 WN6 k • I k_ A 3045 3046 3 3042 859,4859.2 5 859.6 WI13 CW223047 \II, REMOVE AND RELOCATE OVERHEAD WIRES G STORM SEWER TO BE TED, REMOVE PER CITY \RDS, SEE UTILITY PLAN 'OR PROPOSED LAYOUT FOU 055iE REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE, TYP. 133.00 L \ND\\J\ N --\S I11RREA Nod P',OCA-co I I r/////r ",‘,/ e/./ REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING UTILITY POLE, 3/5' B,8 a," #10 A 144*** \\A„ W • rePt#0),,44. 60 50.9 - 60 3055 859.7 WI17 x 7t).6 REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND FOOTING, TYP. '"859,3 MA14 3051 860.1 MA12 3048 859.2 CW29 3049 859.1 WI16 3057 860.1 CW 24 3 8 3062 860.9 WN7 160 1,1 N7306 861. WN1 • 3040 860.1 CW21 30 0.4 CW22 3035 861.0 WN10 066 62.0 N8 \ 4.4" ���`.�4'1.1i►`. "44 1 �! _ s MWrjeTN„1W,9 %9r� , S*1 �®`��‘044.�,6 ��,4X.�#,� ��#04�0�an: 21ND B°SE 71:-•,.. 3031 86W0.293 ELm9L* • ELK.> x 861i3 0ir, 2 34dL �5 �Q *414•44.434* SB ktaft+44404$4* •44,41# 4$4*4404* tre+frs#4604+4,/i 8404$4**1 -9,4;"4•44t 404i/ .00.44440$4440$44414 *40$414+44.0 4/t#4*+40 .4443•444 4•4$44**44 ,.$404•#*+###VS$4* #44* ****0404444. A j 4# 4 ‘#4%.#1 #4** #.4* SeAttel 04 *a • *4 0./.4 *el SAWCUT AND REMOVE REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIAL AND PARKING SIGNS, TYP. REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASE MATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERAL STANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALL SERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITY COMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDS LK 01.1 3021 862.4 EL8 861.4 WN13 RIM INV 30210 862.1 N8 3' '07' II 4 t‘t 044.4 44tvitiftp###, r 1 _ Fus# EXISTING TRAIL TO BE REMOVED l_s _, F0q4u AND REPLACED IN LIKE KIND AS il) I PART OF UTILITY RE-ROUTE, TYP. i COORD. w/ CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 01 Lo a o N8919'36"E -SO REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. 157.00 A \ REMOVE EXISTING PVMT STRIPING FLO -875.4 INV.=868.63 8-15 81 - 100.00 CLEAR & GRUB ALL PLANT MATERIAL, INCLUDING ALL ROOTS (AS PRACTICAL) AND STUMPS. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM SITE. COORDINATE W/ GRADING & LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR SITE PREPARATION AND RESTORATION, TYP. cn o co "IT 1/2 EXISTING BUILDING 16 5,1 .411 ei6 4,c sv IH 1 41 8-65 RL REMOVAL NOTES: 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 6. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 11. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 16. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. CITY OF STILLWATER REMOVAL NOTES: 1. WHERE TREE ROOT REMOVAL IS NON-ESSENTIAL, OR WHERE TREE REMOVAL IS PROPOSED IN BUFFER ZONE, ROOT SYSTEMS TO STAY IN PLACE. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 REMOVALS LEGEND: 11 25 EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL CD Civil Engineering . Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-615-0060 pr 11, YA, 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce 0 (I) 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 REMOVALS PLAN C 1 . 0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. / / // / / / JI'Ir117 3 '0 6. SH SMA22-2STEMS 3193 546,8 SMA38 3194 546,8 SMA15 3189 54108 3179 1, 552.3 CRABS 3188 551.7 WI17 3187553. 3172 BE7 1 544.7 3182 P09 548.6 P010 3181 548.6 P010 4I9 J 1 I 1.71 544,7 0010 180 51.6- 07 3169 544.7 P09 3178 552.3 CRA: 3STEMS 3176 542,2 3177 CH7 542.2 CRABS 3173 544.7 P09 3140 550.7 P08 3141 544.4 P,06 3142 547, P09 7 1. �, 6 46,3 Ali RLS#1 _ 8614 F OPV=860.75 II'1 V; 856.85 _ ,111, 3059, -860.1 Q„ WN6 85.5 FOUND 1 /2" yRO S77-5 Q'QQ„ '9, AMEMIEMEEMEh 4111111111111!G�M111111111111�. MEEMEMEEM MM MM EMMEME11.- hMEEMEEEEMEEk 1IEZIENEEMEEM 1■■ \■■■■■■■■\ I■ STUR -....... is Irmo, /MEOW iiirNummmm. I■■■r IMF 1■■■1 ENEE Imo ummm 'v■■L emk mmmm ommommi mommomi I■■■1 AM /MT A■■■I NIMEEEEEEEEErr E. ii 3045 3046 3043 3042 859,4859,2 859.5 859.6 V113 CW223047 WI12 MA11 858,9 W112 9804-- W 11J ITY EAS MEN PI R (SEE SC DUI E B- I 60 50.9 - 05560^ 59.7 I17 3057 860.1 CW243 8 I , O I/ OI 1-0I FIRE ACCESS LANE, I;)' OVERALL WIDTH. ALL GRASS IN FIRE:ACCESS LANE MUST BE GRASSPAVE, SEE ARCH r-usw r■rMMElm ■r•nisir I■■o-r O l • MK • ■■1. AM ME • 1■■■ • 1 -■r-mm.--1. NM INIEN viii imm MMMiiFr.41-1 ArAp i. 30140 890.1 860,9 86 1' 052 WN7 MA12 1401)-F W22300 �CW24 861,1 D - g0 CW2 0.4 3035 3033 302 37 CW2,2 861,0 861,0 8614. WN10 CW25EL8- 0 )60 71,1 N7306 861. WN1 ElliETEEMEEME MEEMENEME MEM MENNE ,i■■■■■■■■■■■■r** uI \ ■■■■■■■■■■r' IMEEEEMEMk IMEEMEW 1 1 4%�. :j 20 30860,7 3031 EL8 . 860.9 8831114 CW23 ENklii6i EASE • 3032 61.1 L9 3024 861.9 0 (L.)WN11 m 03023 861y1 302'9 ELtt943 x 861.1-- 9. 61.1--9• W )N9 06,;5o 861,6g1/4 61.6 j� WN19�'� 3108 862.9 WSTEMS 105 62.6 46 W32635 3107 \ 8626 3069 3068 .863 863 x863,6 BW43 E '■■■■■■■■■■■■■',IIIEMEEEEEEEEEEEEEE���■■■■���1riiiiiiiiiii „ IRON PIPE FOUND 1 /2 133.00 �. NEEMEMEMEME IMEMEMET MEMEMEI 3083 865.1 EL 4 13067 862.5 003 50a 880. ■ M�I1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■LNIPI KILV1 E R'!!�l■■■■■ :� RIM INV 30210 862.1 WN7 mft I ■ • 882' RLS# NOT LEGIBLE r \ A' !91■■■■I■._ �u■r■■■■e•• . . ■■1■■■1dumi .4rBM1Mir' 97►7G■14 \.,EMT,'" .a Am, vo.�ndI■■T■I�K.■■■■, .�=fir iii:' a►/11'w4 r 30 8 0 3 87 41 '-bJN8 /v c CONSTRUCTION` LIMIT 3014 863.8 ;CkW21 3015 864.4 CW22 O O id d - O O OI o� Lo I OI (OI N8919'36"E I I II I -SO 157.00 O O tri N) II II I 1 I I I I FLO -875.4 INV.=868.63 of OI Ifl (I 100.00 1 300.00 r 11,3 X 831 I F 86 GV \ RL ALL ON- SITE TREES (INC LU D I N G ALL SIGN IF ICAN T' TREES) TREE TAG N, .r SPECIES • 2534 PINE 2537 PINE 2540 CH 2542 OAK 3002 COTTONWOOD 3003 COTTONWOOD 3004 COTTONWOOD 3006 ELM 3010 COTTONWOOD 3011 COTTONWOOD 3013 ELM 3014 COTTONWOOD 3015 COTTONWOOD 3016 COTTONWOOD 3017 COTTONWOOD 3020 WALNUT 3021 WALNUT 3022 ELM 3023 COTTONWOOD 3024 WALNUT 3025 ELM 3026 WALNUT 3027 WALNUT 3028 WALNUT 3030 ELM 3031 COTTONWOOD 3032 ELM 3033 COTTONWOOD 3034 COTTONWOOD 3035 WALNUT 3036 COTTONWOOD 3037 CW 3038 ELM 3039 ELM 3040 COTTONWOOD 3041 COTTONWOOD 3042 MAPLE 3043 WILLOW 3044 WILLOW 3045 WILLOW 3046 COTTONWOOD 3047 WILLOW 3048 COTTONWOOD 3049 WILLOW 3050 MAPLE 3051 MAPLE 3052 COTTONWOOD 3053 WILLOW 3054 WILLOW 3055 WILLOW 3056 ELM 3057 COTTONWOOD 3058 COTTONWOOD 3059 WALNUT 3060 WALNUT 3061 WALNUT 3062 WALNUT 3063 ELM 3064 COTTONWOOD 3065 COTTONWOOD 3066 WALNUT 3067 ELM 3068 BLACK WALNUT 3069 BLACK WALNUT 3070 MAPLE 3071 WALNUT 3072 ELM 3073 ELM 3074 WALNUT 3075 WALNUT 3076 COTTONWOOD 3077 3078 3079 3080 3081 3082 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3090 3091 3092 3093 3094 3095 WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT ELM ELM WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT ELM OAK OAK WALNUT WALNUT WALNUT 3096 WALNUT 3097 BLACK WALNUT 3098 BLACK WALNUT 3099 WALNUT 3100 ELM 3101 OAK 3102 WALNUT 3103 OAK 3105 COTTONWOOD 3106 WALNUT 3107 WALNUT 3109 WALNUT 3110 PIN OAK 3111 PIN OAK 3112 WALNUT 3113 WALNUT 3114 LO 3115 WALNUT 3116 LO 3117 WALNUT 3118 LO 3120 WALNUT 3121 PO 3122 PIN OAK 3123 PIN OAK 3127 PINE 3128 ELM 3129 PIN OAK 3130 PIN OAK 3131 PIN OAK 3132 PIN OAK 3133 PIN OAK 3134 PIN OAK 3135 PIN OAK 3136 WALNUT 3137 PIN OAK 3138 PIN OAK 3139 PIN OAK 3140 PIN OAK 3141 PIN OAK 3142 PIN OAK 3143 PIN OAK 3145 PIN OAK 3146 PIN OAK 3147 BOH ELDER 3148 PIN OAK 3149 PIN OAK 3150 PIN OAK 3151 PIN OAK 3152 PIN OAK 3153 BOH ELDER 3154 PIN OAK 3155 PIN OAK 3156 PIN OAK 3157 PIN OAK 3158 PIN OAK 3159 PIN OAK 3160 PIN OAK 3162 PIN OAK 3163 PIN OAK 3164 PIN OAK 3165 PIN OAK 3166 PIN OAK 3168 CH 3170 PIN OAK 3171 PIN OAK 3172 PIN OAK 3173 PIN OAK 3175 PIN OAK 3176 CH 3177 CRAB APPLE 3178 CRAB APPLE 3179 CRAB APPLE 3180 PIN OAK 3181 PIN OAK 3182 PIN OAK 3183 PIN OAK 3184 PIN OAK 3185 OAK 3186 ASH 3187 BOH ELDER 3188 WILLOW 3189 BOH ELDER 3190 ASH 3191 BLACK WALNUT 3192 SMAPLE 3193 SMAPLE 3194 SMAPLE 3195 SMAPLE 3196 BOH ELDER 3197 PIN OAK 3198 PIN OAK 3199 PIN OAK 3200 PIN OAK 3201 PIN OAK 3202 PIN OAK 3203 PIN OAK 3204 PIN OAK 3205 PIN OAK 3206 PIN OAK 3207 PIN OAK 3208 PIN OAK 3209 PIN OAK 3210 PIN OAK ALLONSTTE Remi MAX MLM RING VAL LMT (10.e/0 RBUR® REPwra.B 1) REMC N® TRS ABOVE LMT TREE RERACIMENT Fs URBnBJr. PER CP ( STANDARD ONE TO -ONE BASIS TRUNK SIZES 1 - 2 3 13 14 Y Y 10 N Y 8 N Y 30 Y Y 24 Y Y 20 Y Y 6 Y N 22 Y Y 27 Y Y 6 Y N 21 Y Y 22 Y Y 28 25 19 Y Y 22 Y Y 7 N Y 8 N Y 10 N Y 35 N Y 11 N Y 8 N Y 8 N Y 13 N Y 19 N Y 8 N Y 23 N Y 9 N Y 25 N Y 20 N Y 10 N Y 22 N Y 25 Y Y 8 Y Y 10 Y Y 21 N Y 21 N Y 11 N Y 12 N Y 13 N Y 13 N Y 22 N Y 12 N Y 29 N Y 16 N Y 14 N Y 12 N Y 22 N Y 14 N Y 19 N Y 17 N Y 7 N Y 24 N Y 25 N Y 6 N N 7 N Y 12 N Y 7 N Y 6 N N 24 N Y 24 N Y 8 N Y 5 Y N 6 Y N 4 Y N 9 Y Y 6 Y N 5 Y N 5 Y N 5 Y N 7 Y Y 26 Y Y 5 Y N 6 Y N 5 Y N 6 Y N 8 Y Y 8 Y Y 4 Y N 4 Y N 7 Y Y 7 Y Y 6 Y N 7 Y Y 9 Y Y 4 Y N 5 Y N 4 Y N 5 Y N 6 Y N 7 Y Y 8 Y Y 13 Y Y 13 Y Y 4 Y N 6 Y N 4 Y N 4 Y N 10 Y Y 32 35 Y Y 5 Y N 8 Y Y 7 Y Y 9 Y Y 6 Y N 8 Y Y 13 Y Y 13 Y Y 4 Y N 12 Y Y 4 Y N 12 Y Y 14 Y Y 19 Y Y 18 Y Y 16 Y Y 13 Y Y 8 N Y 6 N N 7 N Y 8 N Y 8 N Y 6 N N 7 N Y 7 N Y 10 10 10 N Y 8 N Y 7 N Y 9 N Y 8 N Y 6 N N 9 N Y 8 N Y 8 N Y 6 N N 9 N Y 6 N N 6 N N 7 N Y 6 N N 8 N Y 8 N Y 9 N Y 6 N N 6 N N 6 N N 7 N Y 7 N Y 7 N Y 8 N Y 6 N N 9 N Y 9 N Y 6 N N 8 N Y 10 N Y 10 N Y 9 N Y 9 N Y 7 N Y 7 N Y 8 N Y 6 6 6N N 9 N Y 7 N Y 10 N Y 10 N Y 9 N Y 10 N Y 11 N Y 10 N Y 7 N Y 17 N Y 10 N Y 8 N Y 23 N Y 19 N Y 38 N Y 15 N Y 22 22 N Y 10 N Y 6 N N 7 N Y 7 N Y 6 N N 6 N N 6 N N 6 N N 6 N N 6 N N 8 N Y 8 N Y 8 N Y 8 N Y 8 N Y 71 REMOVED • SIGNIF.' Y Y NUM3ER PCT 194 100% 71 37% 68 35% 3 3 TREE REPLACEMENT NOTES: 1. SIGNIFICANT TREES (DEFINED BY CITY OF STILLWATER AS HAVING DIAMATER AT BREAST HEIGHT OF GREATER THAN 6 INCHES) LOCATED WITHIN 15 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE GRADING LIMITS WILL BE PROTECTED BY TREE PROTECTION FENCING. 2. CITY OF STILLWATER REQUIRES REPLACEMENT, ON A ONE-TO-ONE BASIS, OF SIGNIFICANT TREES ABOVE THE 35% REMOVAL LIMIT. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET L1.0 FOR REPLACEMENT TREES. REMOVALS LEGEND: 1 .••► r TREE PROTECTION • XTREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1" = 40'-0" 20'-0" 0 40'-0" e C� G3 OO D C Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Pir yr 11, 'AL 1-- 0 w 0 d 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 N H U W H 2 U ce z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 TREE PROTECTION PLAN Cl .1 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. l� 1I 11 1 1 I 1 / r 1 / 1 1 / 1 / / // W / I 1 4/ 1 /1, / Z 1 II// I / 1 103.5' 1 I 1 1 1 1 /UNDO1/2" IROiv ,I ' 77`5p 00,E 69. r O. V 0 1 I I / ' / /'ewalk easemer 1 I I 1 1 EXISTING PATH DDDDID v// 3191 46 i / / / i 01.11-11 3190 546. ASHB WETLA / FILTRATION BASIN 2 BOTTOM EL.=871.00 OE=872.50 EOF=875.00 100 -YR HWL=873.31 FIL. VOL=(871.00-872.50)=8,107CF _J - FIRE ACCE S LANE, 20' OVERALL WIDTH. -GRAS HIN FIRE ACCESS LANE LIMITS MUST BE *GRASSPAVE*, SEE ARCH 1 46.4' IMP IMP. 1-0 it MOW 4M� h 0 3163 551.0 P06 as 3186 553, ASH1 SMA2 2STEMS 31 546, SMA3 3194 546.8 SMA15 3189 30' WETLAND BUFFER 111, 551.7 W I17 3184 5K53?11 ❑3" 414 � 081 s jl '09P❑8 5'8,6.8 544,7 6.3 .0❑10 54 3210 546.3 P08 3207 546.7 P08 3206 546,7 P08 CONC. WALK, TYP. rfr L . .1r 044 iv% 5 3187 553.1 BE73182 548.6 P01011 548.6 P910 /9 2,3 4B9 3172 544.7 P09 44,9 7 p54 1 351 06 3203 548.9 P06 3201 548.9 3200 P❑6 550.4 4h P06 P 19 49 9 550 8 3 559 WETLAND BOUNDARY I LJ 3178 552,3 CR A 17' 4.6 .7' - 160 161 P 6 46.3 P❑❑\ 09 3173 544,7 P09 -3STEMS 3176 542.2 3177 CH7 542,2 CRAB8 3153 551.5 BE8 2021 9.9 31 548.9 6 557.7 31366 3133 P❑63155 5577 582,65 75.2 P 51 WN10-6STEMS --P466 '- ,'►'sir r 4't!. 3140 550.7 P08 154 31 44-5-4 #*: 3144 315 �`��� 3141 544,4 P06 534147%_ P❑9 14345 5,9 P❑8 09 '57.7 546 - ?627'❑7 48.2 P07 48" ORNAMENTAL FENCSEr OFF EDGE OF CONC PATIO, TYP. 15' BUFFER (INCREASED FOR AVERAGING (2,084 SF) iG1 117IV; ► `c,4�.r■ll■lliOn.,Alp !1e.ti� IIIIIII4 INNOMENIMNINI CONC. WALK, TYP. I16 - PROPOSED WALKABLE GARDEN AREA II *glib i�11//1���11► EXISTING REMOVED INSTALL, TO LIKE KIND, L \MATCHING SE i/ CITY DECORATIVE CONC. PATIO SEE ARCH. FOR OUTDOOR SEATING FURNITURE 77.6 • (8) LIGHTED BOLLARDS, 16' O.C. TYP. INSTALL 6" OFF EDGE OF CONC. PATIO. SHOP DRAWINGS REQ. 3145 31 537.9 554, 55,` \ V 6,,2 3. I 1 1 3149 541.6 P❑6 3150 541.4 P07 550.9 3151 P❑8 552.2 P❑6 // 5- 77.-) H10 20' BUFFER BUILDING SETBACK PDC • • MEM Mir (4) "HITCHING POST" STYLE BIKE RACKS (8 SPACES), SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUF. SPECS. PORTE COCHERE / BUILDING OVERHAN COLUMNS, T CONC. WALK, TYP. RIBBON CURB, 10' TAPERS ON THE SIDES DROP-OFF / VALET PULL IN r -■■■r I T.m■-1 liill �ii�:.ii►, r grip N CURB W LAND AREA D 074,67 SF • I 1 b'3 1 i 1 ' -i 20.0' SITE AREA TABLE: SITE AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDING COVERAGE ALL PAVEMENTS ALL NON -PAVEMENTS TOTAL SITE AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED CONDITION NORTH LOT PROPOSED CONDITION SOUTH LOT DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) IMPERVIOUS TOTAL all, \ a \ ,111, WETLAND BOUNDARY 01. RLS#109y8--Cps -�� <v F(.O =860.75 INJV 856.85 30' 30,, 3044 859.5 859.9 WI12 WI13 ITY EASLMEN 15.0' ,SEE SC DU ACCESSIBLE PARKING N / BOLLARD (TYP) CONC. WALK, TYP. EXISTING B WALKING PA 30.0' • C�. Cs. 06 <To' Ra oo CURB TAPER 0 co H �0? MATCH EXISTIN BIT. WALKING P G ATH 5.0' 0 LC) no INN mmm Moo 53.1' ■■■J■_= -L■, 1 • MINN FIRE ACCESS LANE, 20' OVERALL WIDTH. ALL GRASS IN FIRE ACCESS LANE MUST BE GRASSPAVE, SEE ARCH • tl I CP II rri N) 133.00 FOq\ID RLS# NOT LEGIBLE / o -01 o N89°19'36"E 157.00 CONC. WALK, T P. BIT. PAVEMENT, TYP. PROPOSED NEW PROPERTY DED 193.184 MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. Ono MATCH EXISTING PARKING LOT PVMT, TYP. ->1111111 :Aura IP Emosmom CV 311 111•11MMEI *. OMP. 26.0' 600 SF TRUCK LOADING AREA TLAND BUFFER 1 : 11 305, 860,1 CW25 345 3046 59.4859,2 113 CW223047 858.9 WI12 1 UNDERGROUND 9804, 859.3 MA14 30 1 86 ,1 1 MA12 all, ,t II, 3059 7 _ 8 N6 .1/ 1 861.4 SMH •i 3II 3048\ 859.7 859.2 305Y119, w CW29 859.2 .63049 \,/I1 59.1 I1 ,_1062 8660,0. 9 / Soa WN7 0 60 W2 1.1 24 861,1 5036 CW24 / 860,4 303 5 3033 3025 15' BUFFER (REDUCED FOR L.AVERAGING (1,618 SF) 20' BUFFER BUILDING SETBACK 163.6' 3031 WN11 _114 W23 8%1 3029 STOIVRINNIFELFNAINTENANCE EASE. \A/N9 o 861.6 ENCLOSURE WN19 04, 010. INI=M Dm= SEGMMTAL RETAINING WALL, TYP. AIL • 1111111. ••tearisv um, =0 Mind B6-12 CURB AND GUTTER ),‘ FLOW - NV =8 57 NM MATCH EX CONC WALK .43 8-14 TYP. - CONC. WALK, TYP. PROOF OF PARKING 11 SPACES IMP 498.660 N88° 30' 49.07171/ - 300.00 066 62.0 N8 3023 62.2 MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, 2 EL is IN -12 055 59.7 117 305 860, 3 8 30 3 EL 301 862 1 TP • 3021 862.4 EL8 302 860.9 86 • .9 - 360 51.1 N7306 861 WN 1 • EXISTING PROPOSED NORTH LOT (SENIOR CENTER) 32,320 SF 4.9% 57,848 SF 12.3% 516,689 SF 78.7% 349,711 SF 74.1% 656,946 SF 100.0% 140,257 SF 21.3% 122,345 SF 18.6% 106,290 SF 16.2% 88,378 SF 13.5% 228,635 SF 34.8% PROPOSED SOUTH LOT (CHURCH) 31,908 SF 17.3% 74,382 SF 40.2% 78,600 SF 42.5% 472,056 SF 100.0% 184,890 SF 100.0% 122,345 SF 106,290 SF SITE LAYOUT NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 2. 3. 4. INV.=849.36 3020 WN FILTRATION BASIN 1 BOTTOM EL=864.00 OE=865.50 EOF =867.00 100 -YR HWL=867.36 FIL. VOL=(864.00-865.00)=6,417CF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS -TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 16. 17. CIN 1. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. CITY OF STILLWATER SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: GV BIT. PAVEMENT, PROPOSED NEW PROPERTY I ADJACENT TO EXISTING PLAYGROUND, FOR A MULTI -GENERATIONAL MINGLING - 100.00 - 0 0 EXISTING BUILDIN )8-1c3 3 MD MD MD MID 4 86518E448 ELS ELS \ MONUMENT SIGN, COORD. LOCATION & STYLE w/ ARCH. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION S.E. CHURCH LOT 58 SPACES co • INV RLS# 13774 So. line STOP SIGN, LOCATE PER CITY STANDARDS, TYP. 4 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN ON BRICK STREET DURING ANY UTILITY WORK. SITE PLAN LEGEND: LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) PROPERTY LINE IN • CONSTRUCTION LIMITS lispGOPHER STATE ONE CALL CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.0.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROWS SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY • WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800)252-1166 TOLL FREE (651)454-0002 LOCAL Civil Engineering . Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-615-0060 PF AL acts wilson rchit 0 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 SITE PLAN C2.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 6N ,6 o .SEc D ' S#1093 \ N pF SINE aR�7 .7093 pp/ T SSSg�7dr / ,FS"7 • "I ....„4,44:1 .. � / 54 8 SMA19 3190 546. SH rw 31:4B LIN - 540.6 BE10 3195 546.8 SMA22-2STEMS 3193 546.8 319438 546.8 SMA15 3189 546.8 3179 3188 552.3 551.7 CRAB9 WI17 3187 3172 553.1 BE73182 P097 548.6 548,6 P010 i 00 11 1 3186 553.1 ASH1 55 OK11 353 0 411 54667 S. �I 051, •1 'i 4y:*. /4 ^e 07 -1r 346 3P08 o b 5410.7 • 53428 3 '%' P51VS 1►+�yj':ti��i 3007 ins t _44.9 4� . 546.7 ;,166 C 5309_ 3163 5308 0541py 47,0 160 3206 3167 6 546.7 547,0 t : • ' iiiZr•'.�` 46.3 P07\ P08 s?'tFr 1 550.8 3j!09 PO60 5489 l_•P �7�,319.��`, PO6 5489y•�.'7 5577 y ar.Y 3201 --P06 , P063155 548.9 3200 3136 3133 557 7 3: 5306 550.4 562 6-- 575.2 p 6 �r 175 3169 544.7 P09 3178 552.3 CRA.- STEMS 3176 542.2 CH7 3173 544.7 P09 44.6 3153 551.5 BE8 I / 1 I 1 / 1 1 1 I I I 1 FOUND 1/2" IRON S7T50.00” ' 2 69 `rs - P06 WN10-6STEMS-P06_, r, 565.6 3135 583.6 3134 P076 59 ; J48.2 '97 3130 5307 2EL8 3129 595.8 3177 542.2 CRABS I 3140 550.7 P08 T \\ 1 \\4O N. J 3141 544.4 P136 547.83 5309 545.9 P08 54 313%� �, 314 55 ae _yet 541 09 ,ti, �f �. BE B 185.3 315 535 3 877X, , \ 88.4 3�3 3149 541.6 • P06 Nom. %to 414k POB9 3151 � PO6 3150 541.4 P07 FOUND RLS#10938-- 3058 860.1 CW25 FLOW=860.7 INV.=856.85 -560.1 d WN6 5 861.4 SMH INV 12 c. 3045 3046 3043 3042 859,4859.2 3044 859.5 859,6 W113 CW223047 859. 5 39 WI12 MA11 858.9 WIWI12 o / co - IRON PIPE FouN 14-5 LEGtsa 1 in 14 30 6 859.2 305.°' ',.. CW29 8. / 3049 $59.3 659.1 MA14 i� 30 860.9 052 WN7 W22� 3r 0/oO 1 8801 //-- i CW24 61,1 CW24 / 1 'SOS 3035 3033 3025462 0 CW22 861.0 861.0 861.8 ��..��WWN8 _ if► i WN10 CW25ELB 3051. MA03 12 034 1.64451111;jP9II 61,1 20 3024 3031 W8 6N11. 19 I C8W60293 860.1 3029 30223.230 EL &kU 3028 861.6 588 RIM=861.36 INV.=849.36 50 3057 860,1 60 N7306 861. 3063 861.4 EL6 3019 - 862.1 TP 3021 862.4 EL8 3026 860.9 861.4 -60 0 Lri pi L 0 -o-q-\\`* CSI le IT\ Lu 157.00 11 11 1.2 ,193.184 N82° 10' 28 747 - Ong I I I NV =858.63 I I I 4. 6 (couldn't find manhole) RIM= 873.07* OW=867.37 RIM= 868.00 INV.= 862.80 N88° 30'49.07'7N 300.00 MID CO 8113 911 400.00 FLOW= 868. 36"(inv=7. T OLIVE STRE MI IMP MID MO, MO ELS ELE SE corner Lot 15-, INV.=863.83 FLOW= 869.87 • 5 10 30 0 .9 S 4. RLSji 13774 871.1 SMH-INV7.3 RIM -870.77 RIM 7018 PARKING CALCULATIONS: PARKING ANALYSIS 6.14.2017 OSLC - church site Current sanctuary seats 36 Current parking required 36 Current SE/SW parking stalls 177 Future expansion sanctuary seats 650 Future expansion parking required 217 Future expansion parking available on church site 164 Ecumen - senior living site MC units 36 AL units 36 IL units 72 MC/AL parking required (1:5) 14 IL parking required (1:1) 72 TOTAL RESIDENT PARKING REQUIRED 86 Max. anticipated staff @ shift change 30 Guest parking (estimated) 30 TOTAL ECUMEN PARKING DEMAND 146 Ecu me n garage stalls 85 Ecu men site stalls 83 TOTAL ECUMEN PARKING AVAILABLE 168 COMBINED OSLC (w/ expansion) AND ECUMEN PARKING DEMAND 363 REQUIRED PARKING (REDUCED BY 10% FOR SHARED PARKING) 327 TOTAL Ecumen (gar/surf.) stalls + church existing (no exp.) 332 247 *This surface parking exceeds OSLC (w/expansion) parking demand by 31 stalls, which still should accommodate staff parking and 5 guest parking if peak demand coincides. An additional 14 proof of parking stalls could be added in the future if needed. tip..GOPHER STATE ONE CALL • WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651)454-0002 LOCAL civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 PF y aas wilson rehit 0 Lu 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce (I) 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 OVERALL SITE PLAN C2.1 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. I , I , if1 1 1 I II1 I1I 1 I 1 1 1 ZON P 69. J ----------I 11 - - •liommu •r�mmo►Oulmmi**1 O *L E • /„ IRON pIP=_---�_/112» --x'133'00 >r E LEGIBLE D RAS# NOT `�■■■■■, .VENN\ ' .■■■t EMI ■■■■■■■■■IL■■' ■ ■■■■■■■■■■.IF ■■■■I■■■■■■■■`. 1 ■■.P. -•■■■■t‘ ■■■r ,1■■ i Al.. I■■■I d /Oa _ � _. ■■/ lown•-•==:: ''alai■■I I■■ ■■■ 1■■:::___:: 11NEE 1111EVEENL p MEIN A■■■■► ♦ I■■AU \IEEE. ANN/ %1 T 7■■■■► /BEEN!! /il■■■\s..._�i■■■■■. v■■■■■■■■■■■.'I1 I �`IMEEEEEEEEI\E. ■=-=7■■P,■IVEEEEP I I I I I I I I I 3163 551.0 P❑6 I u c? 3203 548.9 P❑6 3201 548.9 3200 P❑6 550.4 *****ftomm.S I P❑6 f+ 49,9 33U,d 559 41.7 202 IF 31?� 548,9 ■6 `� 7 557,7 PD6, P❑63155 3136 13 557,7 31 582.6 575,2 Ppb 548 WN10-6STEMS �U6_ AL it■■1' \\�_ .IEEE■■■I' ![ _1\. i ►4Ir ■■■■■■■■■_■�-■■■■.:_ K- An■'. u .111. " It' - .■L' - 7■/I■■■■■■■■■I`_UP 11■\. - ■■■■■■■■■■■■EE■N■' 1L. 'EINEM a /1■\ ■1111660 l EE■■EE■■r, _■■.■■■■■I. _1■ IME■■EEEEE■■E■► moomemEr ■11'�11�� ..11 m■!r■■l■I1I■1 iU 565.6 P❑8 3135 583.6 P❑7 3134 581.6 P❑7 Fk,C� 1 MMEM_:j ■■■, J • r 1`'`t 552 315 557.7 546,2 11'3 7P ❑ 7 159 48.2 P❑7 'wire- :04 yam„itt 4005:" 0 0 0 3130 574,2 5 P❑7 3129 EL8 595.8 P❑6 J J. '1 `t 547 BE 3145 314,6 �?7,9 554`q 14❑6 4,4 PIic 28 R. 885.3 550.9 P❑8 3148-. 554.7 ❑6 ruo 3150 541.4 P❑7 3151 552.2 P❑6 54c 77.6 8 x 77,5 877.6 H10 X 877' 5� 08.4 =�iit-d.r,■i■■� ■r,■�-1••E-1 NMI L1■■f■■L'JE■■■ _iumJ■■■!J ■r-v■■■■■r-i■ mi •,■■■■■■■■■■■■._ ....• 1I■NIMMEN■•■■■■■I■M►, • • • • • • • • • • • =MEMO ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • 0.naU■■il■■■■■■■ 89°19'36"E 157.00 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 II I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I __ 193.184 N82°1� 0 28.74"W .MM■■■■■i. AV •• 1■■■■■■► �■�► 11■■■■■E�1\ ■■L..,. i■■■■r - 1 i■■■r■■■■■■i► 41 1■■■■■■■■■■L- • i ■r = 'MEW AYAIM..■ f. AWNS vAvAINEIMMEN IL ...I■■rte■■■■■■■ `moi■m■■■■■■■■■■■■i EEEEEMEIEBEEEMitimb i■■■■■■■r - -.Nor \■■■■■■ ► 4 VP' 1 I .:...:.. A■■■■'. A If • 1 ■\' A■■■■■L' - Vit; i■■I� f\i■\,. ■■■■■■■aLIMP I■■ \■P■■■■■■." '■■IEEE\ «\■■■■■w 41■■■■■■■' •\■■■■L •I■■■■rmm ‘/■■■IEEE■■/''7F ,ra1■■■■■■■..//C vi■■■■■■■e %ANNE■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ErnmEN ♦ .40 • • 9 i ,, i AL IEEEi BELLI INN 'L MEW IEEEEMMEEEW AMINNIMINIENNI IMEN imms • • ST 00, \%, ,\Il, N FOUND RLS#1098--- --_ 3058 860.1 CW25 3045 3046 3043 3042 859,4859,2 3044 859.5 859.6 WI13 CW223047 \II, 859.9 WI12 MA11 858.9 WI13 WI12 011, /441V401 1.4:141% 4116 Noier WevitikStyLI C 21 ,/ Oh 1 FLOW= 860. 75 -r INJV.=856.85 ,dl, 3059 860.1 WN6i 1 3048 859.7 859,2 305VI19z 860.9 MA12 W2230 i 860.4 3035 3033 3025 i CW22 861.0 861.0 861,8 311 54o / 3114 _ L 413 64 034 61.1 3031 860,9 W 23 860,1 EL8 3032 3024 861.9 WN11 41411. 40-511111111 066 62.0 N8 861.4 SMH INV - 12 Asa 011111111111111 3023 3029 •62.230 X 861.1 3028 ' 861.6 1 1 .2 5 --- 60 055 59,7 117 3057 860.1 3 8 3063 861.4 EL6 3019 862.1 TP 3021 862,4 EL8 3026 860.9 861.4 1 60 1.1 861 mmi IMM 3020 862.1 Air :IL j III 11 • • . . _,_________ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••!...„ , ....:,..:::,, A ow ii ..., ‘,...2 I......., ..... 1 575.43 58.63 0 100.00 MID M. MD MD co 0 0 P 300.00 • 4 L\s-13 01. 3077 3075 \A/N9 wN7 13t35,1864,8 HER STATE OklEcACLLA.0LRL • 11111" (800) 252-116 TOLL FREE (651) 454 002 LOCAL t4Z RLS# 1" GV • olur- RLS# 13 HPfike Civil Engineering * Surveying * Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-615-0060 pr vr AL LLWATER ECUMEN-ST 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 0 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma hew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 TURNING DIAGRAM - TRASH TRUCK C2.2 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' i ON P 69_ 1 I ; I I II / I 1 I ,I I I 1 1fI I II 1 1 J Cnn,erv. Ptr rAisten $11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■ I II II II 11 1111111110 1401111.16, *VENNI MI 000 111111 .■■■i ■■■Ni■■/ M■■� ■■■■■■■■\.,■■' 11111111111u ■■VW`\■■'MEM V / ////,9I■■' VELA,_—_. // %//MMYLANNI III \■■ 'MIME I■■---__ .■■■■ ■■■■ MEINI■■ --- \1 MEIN t .■■!I IMIMMEk /ME AU i■■■■► ANNE % 9 'M■■■■► I■■■`ry 1/&11I■■\IN i■■■■■! ► M■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■M'I `■■■■■E■■■■■r■■ -"ME M-_7■■V Aff i■■■■■■■■' !! .\. AIMMMIMMEMMIMILILAIMII 1417 91■r:�■■■■■e,■I._i■■■��■■., .Ir. .1 I■■E,■■■■■■■r ■r " AMU _.■L' - 7■/I■■■■■■■■■I► `1w . 11■.. ■■■a■■\r:1■/■■■■■■■■■■■\�•_ma_,. I■■■. - ■■■■■■■■■■■■MM■M■' 1L. MMM■■MIa /1■\ MEMEL_ Air 1K MM■■EMY■I 1, Er■■mm■r - . ■111�11�� '! MM■■ME■■■■■■EM ! 1 \ ---NMI -1 a'=�iif=�■r�■I■■i ■rte■�=7■■■—� L1■■a_ ■■L'J■■■■J■■J■■■!.1 ■r -■■■■■■r1■ r - Et• 1mm •,. • ii"••••••••• ■■■■■■■■w■■■■■► • • Err7. dw■■■■�► II " 1■■■MM■\ AMII, Iu■■EMUM► ■■L..,.I■■■� " 1 ■■■Y■■■■■MIn 41 I■■■■■■■■■i.•=, 'IMMIWAYAIMMIMI • ■i. /U■.qy1�■■■■ ►11:A111111■1111 D RLS# NOT LEGIBLE • 1 I� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ■■■■■■■■w■■■* MUMMER/ - -,.. 1 i■■■■■■ ► 4 I P11 .'■■. nI■_ ■■■■■■■■a. -AMI . MINMEM■M, ■�■■■■■■." 1■■■■■■\ ZINE■■L •/■■■■M& ` AMMIMM■■■■■E''7,F `rael■■■■■■■I.% \\ya\\\1■■■■■■■u, ‘mi■■■■■■■r ■■■■■■■■■ ..■■■■-■■,00. ■■■■■■■■■■■urAPI _AMIMME■■■y \■MIME■■■I \P7■■■■ L1■■■■ 0]■■■ t■■■■■. 1 1 1 \ 89°19'36"E 157.00 1 1 , 1 \ 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 , 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I j 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 - - 193.184 N82°1- 0 28.74"W r p••••••••••••••=•=mm•••••••= t MED an MID MID MID MD _298 N88° 30' 49.07"W r— 1 III ■■�■■�* #1u1:k i■■■■==■■■■=\ 4 11 I■■■■■ .■■■__ r L 300.00 I 11 _ ---,-,I L, _ 111 --,4.2 • 111 FOUND RLS # 109$8--- --_ -;1114 - 1- 1 i=1 t. I 1 EL 4 [< 4 100.00 0 c 0 o 0 .— o 0 -0J I Q In IMO / 1 FLOW=860.75 -1' Ir V.=856.85 / — T IH 4V/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 861.4 SMH INV - 12 60 5p.9- 60 60 5E.9 '---RIM=8 INV.=E — �-I G V RLS# COrts®rvr =ID MID 4 3077 307E 307` 3072 WN5 WN77, ;r5 11 3,4 8 EL5 EL7 7 v • -HER STATE OME CALL WJVW.GOPHERSTATEO CALLORG (800) 252-116 TOLL FREE Tit (651) 454 002 LOCAL tgt ;015 864,4 1_W22 4 15'-0" 0 30'-0" Sfike Oo Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 pr y 11, 'A LLWATER ECUMEN-ST 1- 0 w O 0_ 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 1- 0 W 0 oc Z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MahewR. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 TURNING DIAGRAM - FIRE TRUCK C2.3 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' \ fLOW- INV =868.63 875.43 ______<<_____< r\ t MED an MID MID MID MD _298 N88° 30' 49.07"W r— 1 III ■■�■■�* #1u1:k i■■■■==■■■■=\ 4 11 I■■■■■ .■■■__ r L 300.00 I 11 _ ---,-,I L, _ 111 --,4.2 • 111 FOUND RLS # 109$8--- --_ -;1114 - 1- 1 i=1 t. I 1 EL 4 [< 4 100.00 0 c 0 o 0 .— o 0 -0J I Q In IMO / 1 FLOW=860.75 -1' Ir V.=856.85 / — T IH 4V/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 861.4 SMH INV - 12 60 5p.9- 60 60 5E.9 '---RIM=8 INV.=E — �-I G V RLS# COrts®rvr =ID MID 4 3077 307E 307` 3072 WN5 WN77, ;r5 11 3,4 8 EL5 EL7 7 v • -HER STATE OME CALL WJVW.GOPHERSTATEO CALLORG (800) 252-116 TOLL FREE Tit (651) 454 002 LOCAL tgt ;015 864,4 1_W22 4 15'-0" 0 30'-0" Sfike Oo Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 pr y 11, 'A LLWATER ECUMEN-ST 1- 0 w O 0_ 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 1- 0 W 0 oc Z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MahewR. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 TURNING DIAGRAM - FIRE TRUCK C2.3 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.' 00 WETLAND1O ---- _ 2,586.19. • ll 1 1/ 1 1 \!I') 854 8 EA A t 854 I ,111, I. 855.5 855.1 854,9 1 ; II, I /854.8 86 855.1 862 867.100 854 MATCH 853.2 Q / 3 / I 0 I854.4 854.5 Z 1 8 A.00 TCH ATCH 54,5 Q- t 1,4 851'4 8-S36RCp 1N� ,>• 4 DCS DEW EXISTING POND N WL= 856.2 H WL= 860.5 1,4 BASIN 2 OVERT NNST-Au 4 TURF REIN MnDOT CAT -CONTROL REINFORC: SOIL FILL 851'3 858,6 037 X8 8 • • 858,7 OW X8 DOT CATEGORY RCE EME EM NT -MAT -MI5 - - ORY 4 EROSION U. TURF ENT MAT -Tall BE- ,G / 851,1 859,2 858.6 3 3192 546.8 SMA19 3 31968 LIN 540.6 BE10 3195 ,\II, 546.8 SMA22-2STEMS 46 2.1X 861,6 9.8 ,\ b 3188 551.7 WI17 3193 546.8 SMA38 3194 546,8 SMA15 3189 546.8 Bt110 F \ 191 L SF n F \ 3632, 1 \\ . • 14/1 3179 552.3 CRAB9 3172 544,7 P09 / 861.2 6.00 MACH 3169 544.7 P09 3178 552.3 CRA:•. 3STEMS 3176 542,2 3177 CH7 542,2 CRAB8 59.1 3140 550.7 P08 B- �j 5 44,9 07 1 44,6 7- Q160 166 CH _ 47.0 P❑9 SB -1 46.3 878 TIO 143 45.9 08 860.2 SB 32. '4C P1. 879 3149 541.6 P06 3150 541.4 60.4 P07 1 3151 '• 552.2 60.2 P06 WETLAND AF, 57,074.67 S \II, 11 873.411-1- 1 73.41 r --f- / 1 II �1 875.98 1 4 .5'5 FOUND 1/2878. S7 MATT 50'00 c1 `% X X80. • • 1 1 1 (378 ,IAT 16 875.8/011 876.6 - 877.:: %�i■fp7__1■n%l■t INEME ■■■■■■E�r 879.59 880.00 • 881.00 879.90 878 g32 B91 880.33 879 32 880.33 111111111111111111111111111►111111._ IliONLIMMENE- - ,w1111111111i► n■■■ ia■■■■■■■� n■■■ina■■■■m� 881.00. n■■■i... ..■n DOOR r■■■■1■■■-i■■■■. ■n■■r■■■r■■■■■ 881.00 - 881.00 880.33 859.9 I` \ MATCr866.81- MATCH = 1 1 MATCH - ,0 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY INTERTK PSI, INC., DATED 03-03-17 GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED IN BORINGS RANGING FROM ±5 FEET TO ±29 FEET DEEP. B-01 B-02 B-03 B-04 B-05 B-06 B-07 B-08 B-09 B-10 B-11 B-12 ±853.00 ±877.00 NOT OBSERVED ±873.00 NOT OBSERVED NOT OBSERVED NOT OBSERVED ±862.00 ±878.00 ±866.00 ±871.00 ±874.00 MSCWMO BIOFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 82 858.8 858,9 859,4 859,4 5-0-1.3-4 EXCAVATION WITHIN 2.0 FEET OF FINAL GRADE FOR INFILTRATION/FILTRATION SYSTEMS IS PROHIBITED UNTIL CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS ARE CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED. RIGOROUS SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS PLANNED TO DIVERT RUNOFF AWAY FROM THE SYSTEM. IN SN LATION OF VOLUMNE CONTROL FACILITIES MUST OCCUR IN DRY SOIL CONDI S. EXCAVATION, SOIL PLACEMENT AND RAPID STABILIZATION OF PERIMETE SCOPES MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT. / � EXCAVATION SHALL BES FORMED BY AN EXCAVATOR WITH A TOOTHED BUCKET. USE EXCAVATOR BUCKET .ACE MATERIALS. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED INTO TR'S, IN. 9\\ -815.‹,,c" T\ c �� PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF ANY REMAINTItlCEE OR SECURITY, THE PERMIT HOLDER MUST PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TH QONSTRUCTED VOLUMF;2•0 CONTROL FACILITIES PERFORM AS DESIGNED.%•%...2 861.8 86 ' \ A 3058 860.1 CW25 908- -0-- F0'=860.75 I N 856.85 o� 1 859.5 _ ,t11,3059 860.11 g61,1 Q 859,£ N6 60.7 BF L 861.4 SMH IN --- 60 876.82 IMME MEER IMMEMEms IMMEMMAI iiii�'•• alta, MAU AIM/ AMMEW 0 r Ioo c0 rn c0 881.00 14. 880.33 880.00 880.33 881.00 881.00 881.00 871.66 -7\R 1111-0■■■ ■■ ■Q-•. 879.79 88� �dr7■G•m•■•• •IUU• �:.-. ■\ 880.07 • • MEMEL! •r ■■1,:79.84 �i■■��■■�i►. E NEEI Cc:% I■EtiMM I■EMEMB 1■ 880.E30 ■ a a Mme. Oil Q 879.40 878.28 8.59 879.56 0.80 880. 3043 3044 859,5 859,9 WI12 859.50_ MATCH MEN 11 \\II, 859,8 Ott *A 59,3 • 'SA* ,C '1A14 • 859.5r 2 7 MATCHI 3045 3046 g5g,1 3042 859,4859.2 WI13 CW22 3- \II 859,6 3047 MAll I / 858.9 WI12 B- I\I 9804' \ 859 .• 9.1 880.90 g80 879. 879.60 880.33 880.96 880.00 �`8 87:. cP 866.3 • / n/ / C 861.0 WN10 880.33 X pS 880.33 881.00 '878.95 DOOR 878.50 880.33 878.93 I / - 0 I, oI (0I I I I I I „ IRON PIPE. FOUND 1 �� 133.00 1\1 Y. 7L5511 - I \\\ION\C1°P\IH\S .76 CH 1 \ kr 30 -- MIA CH is .I • N. •I 1I 879.74 653880 ni ■88�''' 65 6.53 �1I E■■■■I.■■■■I ■■■/A■■■III ■■C 11� :80.55 876. ' 3 881., 138 3 878.99 878.13 76.35 .diii `1111/.'. i■■■--- wA■efa A■■■■.'iMEMQGl .■■■■■r■■■■■iae MMESIMMEMMEMEMMI mom= ..a■■i �- mum ;■■■\\■ 1111■■■■■ 1 1111111 �i1ii�.� .31 876.11 870)117 869.66 864 865 ratiAIN 3048 861 j5 ,../.4.4,„g4 859,2 CW29 8 3049 859,1 WIC :8‘56°N/36°750:251995.1211'9r11; 052 .t 60.2 W2230.. 1 j W • �CW24 8613 CW24 W22 3035 3033 302 861.0 861. CW25EL8-1 Q\ ,9 066 62.0 N8 3032 r;.11011041.\ 3024 861.9 0 WNl1 m 3023 86,1 3029 . ,2 3 EL x 861,1"- _ _ 63.49 '334 AV ATCI-Le \/10 • • 3031 860.9 • >- 60'9X 5 05560 59.7 I17 861'1 X 3057 860,1 CW24 3360 851.1 N7306 861. WN1 62,1 61,E 615 631 9 1,6 861. 019 862,1 TP 869.66 871.67 871.39 670. 870.87 DOOR maNNEENEENEENEENamalaima IMMEMMEMMEMMWME ammEmmEmmmmamr ur IMMEMMudialSP AMMEMEMEM AMMEMMEMMEMMOI mm ..MMEMMEMMIY • TOP BERM • • • • EL • 3026 860,9 861.4 8693 86 76.27 70.97 869.52 • 69.12 64,1 5B7- 1.80 2.68 8,9 876.30 876.10 876.14 01 76.46 872.1 869.08 • • IMPararrAtir-m7-P-17**- • L - A 87 .76 55 87 .98 876.21 876.7 6.7 876.75 876.70 868. 868.27 87 866.31 3,6 863.61 '3 MATCH (PA M0116 65.67 8 864. • gLs# NOT LEGIBLE 87 1 881.74 MATCH cp MATCH M.,ATCH -163 9I7 "6B 878 03 MATCH X 816'6 • yak 876,58, 1' 876.58 NV =8.8Jki MATCH HP CH 877.20 Si _ MATCH --\\;/'127 877 '312:-717 MATCH CONSTRUCTIONO LIMIT 874.40 MATCH 9-7401 87/ 872.30 MATCH 8323 869 870 43 9-11.3 100.00 9-75,4 914.6 5.1 MATC 3 )(9653 865A22 GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS, PARKING AREAS, WETLANDS, AND WETLAND BUFFER AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. GRADING PLAN LEGEND: 1125 1137 891.00 G 891.00 TC 891.00 BS/TS 1111400 iipirGOPHER STATE ONE CALL EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW • WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL Civil Engineering . Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-615-0060 pir ik 0 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 GRADING PLAN C3.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CNII_ SITE GROUP NC. 1 9 I 1 I '1 / / 89 LF 12" HDPE (/r lLu 7 71 RIM=B .50 U i I =8 8.59 /ED 9.00 1'aI W / I/ , I / �1 I I /196 LF 30" RCP TORM @0.54% / 9 192 LF 12" HDPE 1STORM @1.00% OUND 1 /2" IRON \ 1?��50p0„ / \c),_., ------/9. V,. / v' / �1 II I1, I 1 1 1.00% it / ' Def CLhANOUT I FES 30 IE=±871.00 balk I I I I I 851� FES 70 IE=±857.70 \\Z M H4%�/ J Tr-RUCOVER EXISTING S,TORM`, WER, PER CITY 9 z8TA/NDARDS, TYP. M=869.50 X IE (N, 36")=±856.86 (FSI€LD VERIFY) z \ PROs . IE (S)=857.25 31 // // / / // // / / asement FES 50 IE=±871.00 I 6" DRAINTILE @ 0.00% IE=869.00, TYP. - - 5469 32108 546.3 P08 s 3207 `546.7 1'`❑8 54156,7 P08 SF 3192 546.8 SMA19 3190 546. ASH 3195 all, 546.8 SMA22-2STEMS 3186 553. ASH1 Ifs 553 ❑K11 3193 546.8 SMA38 3194 546,8 SMA15 3189 546.8 3188 BIL ;13 WI17 3187 553.1 BE73182 548.6 P010 3181 548.6 P010 3179 552.3 CRAB9 3172 544,7 P09 3169 544,7 P09 3178 552.3 CRA 08 FILTRATION BASIN 2 BOTTOM EL.=871.00 OE=872.50 EOF=875.00 100 -YR HWL=873.31 FIL. VOL=(871.00-872.50)=8,107CF 76 LF 12" HDPE STORM @1.00% ik ThRIgH 31 RIM=877.50 I E=871.76 56 LF 10" SDR 26 PVC STORM @2.00% STUB STORM TO 5' FROM BLGD. COORD. W/ MECH'I STUB IE=872.12 1 BLDG IE=872.22 COORD. ELEVATIONS W/ MECH'L PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TYP. i63 551.0 P06 5415 P08 3 3173 544.7 P❑9 3STEMS 3176 542.2 3177 CH7 542.2 CRAB8 p544 31676 547ATFii 19 1 r Q 5.: ' 202 l.,t � P❑: 548.9' 54832019 3200•731N316�6 P❑6 550P❑6.4 6$T` S 53 175 5 144 6 BE8 �.. ; 7` X160 161 5 6 46,3 P❑0 C`TIO 3140550 3141 P❑87 544,4 P06 3142 547. P09 40.11. 565 P08 3135 583.6 P07 i AMMEMMEMMEMMEMPPIET 6 3131 574,c Z. P07 3129 r \ 3134595.8 581.6 AP❑6 ♦ • '7477. P07- s..\ 10 8E ♦ ♦ \ 31 554,8 t4f.06 • 14'4 314 554,1 nnK 143 45,9 08 / / 3149 541.6 P06 3150 541.4 P07 550.9 3151 ''•" P❑8 552.2 P06 "fl i- '111111111111111111111►. IIIIIIIIIIIII► �IIIIiIIIIIIII :....,■■■,MINE x 885,3 • • • • • • 111111J}I MH41 RIM=877.00 IE=858.31 • - NIB • SII" 4�IIIIIi: mr • 'M: aI ■■■N 1I■■■■ • 219 LF 30" RCP STORM @0.54% • • STUB SANITARY TO 5' FROM -11-1 r If r BLGD. COORD. W/ MECH'L L FIRE DEPARTMENT IMMEMEMI IMMEMEMI VMS. AmILMF 'E■■■.um AM .E■N■■r CONNECTION STUB IE=867.38 BLDG IE=867.48 COORD. W/ MECH'L 6" DIP COMBINED FI . AND DOMESTIC WATE SERVICE. STUB TO 5\ FROM BLDG. COORD. W/ N. O 4)144 69 .NN863.1 WETLAND AREA D 57,074.67 SF FOUND RLS#10938- :‘''.' 1 1'J FiLO=860.75 I1y1v856.85 3058 860,1 CW25111,3059, -WN61/ ♦ ♦ 3045 3046 3043 3042 859,4859.2 _ ♦ ♦ - WI13 3044 859,5 859.6 V/113 CW223047 ,\II, ; 858.9 WI12 859.9 W112 MAli MECH'L HYDRANT AN GV, TYP. Iiiiih 6"X6" T 148 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @2.0W% (SEE SC • • €B 14 RIM9.31 1.04 AMMEMMEMEMEMMI AMMEMMEMMEMMEM ir ■■■■EEE■■■ • • =MEM MEM N■ MEW ■■■■■■■■■■■■Era CBMH 1 RIM=876.29 immommommommy• Immommommow IE -:69.52 SANMH 2 RI M=875.90 IE(NW)=864.42 `f? IE(S)=864.32 c} 45° BEND 78 LF 18" HDPE' STORM @4.00% 11.25° BEND 0 1 aiI RIM=880.50 FIRE ACCESS LANE, OVEREffM10. ALL GRASS IN FIREACCESS LANE MUST BE 1GRASSPAVE, SEE ARCH FOUND 141(2." IRON FIF) IIIREES 1"5 FOq•IO RLS# NOT LEGIBLE 000) rei 11 • • 4C75C 30 77 LF 8" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY @2.00% OMMElh- snommommm 6 LF 15" HDPE STORM @2.00% CB 12C RIM=875.22 141 LF 15" HDPE STORM @2.00% 4011111111116, ANCIM. 111" ImmEmmor CBMH 11 RIM=873.33 IE=866.40 SUMP IE=XXX INSTALL SAFL BAFFLE PE' MANUF DUES- ) ail: 1Cik�'r ��;�� ��59.3 Y A14 iii3040 0.1 1 1k/re 7:W22 \ • tj _•° ;,.36 r . 60.7 BFL Ir1V-3,9 861.4 SMH IN -12 3048 859.7 89q 7 3055'1118, FES 60 859 2 ' WI1 =±859.20 STORMWATER MAINT ♦ ;6" CAST IRON 860.9 052 WN7 60,2 EI 055 59.7 I17 3057 860.1 CW24 3060 861.1 N7306 861, WN1 �124LF15"HDPE STORM @1.85% 066 62.0 N8 034 61.1 W20 3063 861.4 EL6 3019 862.1 TP 3021 862.4 EL8 860.9:__ WATER MAIN 3 0 ♦ L3 ECts (AS -BUILT) 3_5 1 NANCE EASE. .-EX `8" Pyc SANIIAELY, • 0 MAIN 1, CB 61 • (AS -BUILT') 1 RIM=865.50 • _ne_ glIMEMENV RIM=875.01 DT CLE/ANOUT ( FES 10 22 LF 12" HDPE 860.9 -01 01 o 126 LE 8" HDPE STORM @2.00% 1_1_25° BEND 860.5 3020 862,1 FILTRATION BASIN 1 BOTTOM EL. -464.00 OE=865.50 100 -YR HWL=867.36 FIL. VOL=(864.00-865.00)=6,417CF ATE VALVE • • • • 95 LF 30" RCP STORM ©0.54% 011111 GNP CB 12B RIM=875.40 IP ire° SA M RIM= 74 MH 2 7.26 .22 2 Nomg•BENNENEENNENcommommumEmititamommENNENEcomi ..,:01,.. NMI MD MID MID 1 - STORM @2.00% MH43 CONSTRUCT OVER EX STORM SEWER, PER C ANDARDS, TY EX IE(S)=+86 (FIELD! VERIFY) 1 NV =8.84 1 crabrov tri CB 12A RIM=875.40 99 LF 12" HDPE FFL CB 3 RIM=867.26 LK 12" HDPE STORM @1.00% NM WO MID MID 1 100.00 `-West line o -o CONSTRUCTION LIMIT .00 EXISTING BUILDING MAKE CONNECTION T9, EXISTING MANHOLE AE s) = B8 U561 0±0 EXISTING ' CAST IRON MAKE CON ECTION TO - WATER MTN IDER CITY 1 IE(N)=855.90 (AS BUILT) PROP IE(W)=856.00 COORDINATE WITH C CALL WATER BOARD,6j (651)-439=6231 PRIOR TO MA Nq WET TAP CON ST TO COORDINATE, CONTRACTOR TO PJOVIDE ONE PAVEMENT PATCH FIR NEW UTILITY CONNECTIONS. PAVEMENT SECTION TO BE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 4ITH 1.5" WEARCO RSE OVER 2.5" BASE OVER 6" CLASS 5 SUBBASE. 3! CONTRACT T PROVIDE TRAFFIC ONTROL PLAII ANY UTILITY 4. MAINTAIN 1.6.,Q SEPARATION BE111/VEEN SEWER ANDIWATER ON BRIC RLS# 13774 So. line of I ECTION ON BRICK ORK ON BRICK ST. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE. VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. UTILITY LEGEND: • • 04 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL CATCH BASIN MANHOLE GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FES AND RIP RAP Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 LLWATER ECUMEN-ST 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 UTILITY PLAN C4.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!!IIIIqoo 1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) 1.5" BINDER COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) 7.0" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD 11-111-1 1-1 1-111-111- PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT N TS NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR IIIIIIIII!!! FINAL PAVEMENT I-IIII IIII-I f SECTION. II III III III wei 1.5" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) 2.0" BINDER COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) 8.0" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT N TS 1/2" RADIUS FINISHED GRADE -I I I 4I' b • • 411",c7:djt- _cii5 a LI d d A 3" RADIUS CORNERS 1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1' 0.5% SLOPE -CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE GUTTER (T.O. GUTTER) WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB. SEE PLAN FINISHED GRADE NOTES: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS CLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE -SEE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6" MIN.) B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NTS 20" FINISHED GRADE SLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1' CONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PAVEMENT MATERIALS SEE DETAIL NOTES: 1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/- 2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONS RIBBON CURB N TS CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER 2' 0" 1'-0" MIN. 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TO BE PLACED BY PAVING CONTRACTOR VALLEY GUTTER N TS THIS OCCURS ONLY WHERE MULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALK LEAVE TOP OF MULCH DOWN 1" FROM TOP OF WALK ADE O I 1-111-111-111-111 NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. 2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. 3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 5. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. 6. WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS REQUIRED FOR ALL WALKS OR IN LOCATIONS FOR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. TOOLED CONTROL JOINT SEE DETAIL (TYP.) LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE 5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED 1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS SPECIFIED 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE WALK/PAD N TS 6" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 6" LINE WIDTH 3" LINE WIDTH 5'-6" SQUARE OVERALL 18" RADIUS ALL COLORS TO MATCH ADA STANDARD COLORS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING N TS PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $2D0 FINE FOR VIOLATION X1'6" --I ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2) METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE CODE GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUARE POST AS SPECIFIED 6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1 COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATS SIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT. COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTIC COVER. 10 DEGREE SLOPE MATERIAL VARIES -SEE PLAN 1 INCH SILICONE RUBBER OR ASPHALTIC CAULKING COMPOUND FILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCH FROM TOP WITH SILICA SAND 1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM OF 6" PIPE CONCRETE FOOTING AS SPECIFIED NOTE: 1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED. 2. VERIFY POST PAINT COLOR WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. N TS ADJUST TOP TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHED PAVEMENT GRADE OR 1" BELOW FINISHED TURF GRADE. SET SO AS TO PROVIDE 12" OF UPWARD ADJUSTMENT. GATE VALVE BOX N TS AS REQUIRED COVER SHALL BE STAMPED WITH "WATER" FINISH GRADE VALVE BOX GATE VALVE REFER TO DRAWINGS FOR SIZES WATERMAIN CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK PROVIDE INSULATION PER PLAN FIELD VERIFY DEPTH DIA + 3' z 11= NOTES: u BACKFILL MATERIAL FINISH GRADE 11011 „AVM.. PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL 1.-6" (MIN) 1=1"- FINE _11 I - FINE SAND (FA7) MIN. 2' WIDE BY 4" THICK INSULATION BOARD (USE 2-2" THICK BOARDS). MASTIC ALL JOINTS EXTEND INSULATION BOARD DOWN SIDES TO 7.5' DEPTH. UTILITY PIPE 1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETING ASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATER ABSORPTION (ASTM C272). 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS. 3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL NTS EACH AREA IS 1/2 OF TABULATED AREA lG. mew NW CROSS 45° BEND WYE PLUGGED CROSS BEND PLUGGED TEE Al ISIV PLUGGED CROSS TEE Ild PLUG OR CAP 1/4" PLYWOOD OVER FACE OF BOLTS NOMINAL FITTING SIZE (INCHES) TYE, WYE, PLUG, OR CAPPLUGGED 90° BEND, CROSS TEE PLUGGED ON RUN 45° BEND 22.5° BEND 11.25° BEND Al A2 4 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.0 - - 6 2.1 3.0 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 - 6 3.8 5.3 7.6 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 5.9 8.4 11.8 8.4 4.6 2.6 1.2 12 8.5 12.0 17.0 12.0 6.6 3.4 1.7 14 11.5 16.3 23.0 16.3 8.9 4.6 2.3 16 15.0 21.3 30.0 21.3 11.6 6.0 3.0 18 19.0 27.0 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.6 3.6 20 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 24 34.0 48.0 68.0 48.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH. 2. KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR OF JOINT AND ACCESSORIES. 3. IF NOT SHOWN ON PLANS, REQUIRED BEARING AT FITTING SHALL BE AS INDICATED ABOVE, ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY, TO CONFORM TO THE TEST PRESSURE(S) AND ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS(ES). 4. BEARING AREAS AND SPECIAL BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER BEARING AREAS AND BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN THIS STANDARD DETAIL. 5. ABOVE BEARING AREAS BASED ON TEST PRESSURE OF 150 P.S.I. AND AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS OF 2000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. TO COMPUTE BEARING AREAS FOR DIFFERENT TEST PRESSURES AND SOIL BEARING STRESSES, USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: BEARING AREA = (TEST PRESSURE/150) X (200/SOIL BEARING STRESS) X (TABLE VALUE). THRUST BLOCK NTS VT O M Civil Engineering " Surveying " Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 pir v aa veils© urchrte 1- U w O 0 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 CIVIL DETAILS C5.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 4 SIN SIN 8 MIN. RUBBER BOOT 27"� U 0 COVER SHALL BE STAMPED "SANITARY SEWER" METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE RUBBER GASKET - TYP AT ALL JOINTS SLOPE AT 2 IN./FT. (TYP) RUBBER BOOT //— =LOW ( BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH SLOPE @ 2 IN./FT. (TYP) 111 I!1 Ntatli GROUT TO 1/2 PIPE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE N TS METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. STORM SEWER PIPE - SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION, INVERT, AND SIZES BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH VARIES - TYP. 4' "RIM ELEVATION" PRECAST COVER - 8" THICK STEPS - INSTALL ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE @ 16" O.C. RUBBER GASKET - TYP AT ALL JOINTS PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION GROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS CATCH BASIN N TS COVER SHALL BE STAMPED "STORM SEWER" DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC 6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC 7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC ICV DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE: 4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC 5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC 6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC 7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC 8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TO STRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPE MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS. GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, AND ALONG OUTSIDE. PRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTION STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE GROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS STORM MANHOLE N TS BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10 MESH L 12" ►�0.5Bc Bc+12" Min. Compacted Backfill 2000# Concrete LOAD FACTOR 2.3 CLASS A Concrete backfill to 0,5 of outside diameter with shaped bedding. "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe Bc/4 but less than + + + + + + + not'9 + 6" i + + + + + H' + + + + + —III_ —III—III—III III—III 111= I Bc+12" Min. Compacted Backfill Course Filter Aggregate MnDOT Spec, 3149H Mod. L "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe 6" -1 1 0.5Bc—• Bc+12" Min. I I IIIII IIII II LOAD FACTOR 1.9 CLASS B Hand shaped from angular bedding material Compacted Backfill "Ed" Denotes outside diameter of pipe + + Bc/4 but nor= I + + + + + + + + + + III less than 6" =1 f 1 1 1 1 11lI l l=iii—I1155=111=111=111=111=111=T- 7— Bc+12" Min. rl LOAD FACTOR 1.5 CLASS C-1 Hand shaped from firm undisturbed soil 111 I Compacted Backfill Course Filter Aggregate MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod. LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Sc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS 12" 6" + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + CLASS C-2 • + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f I � 1-1 Wil—III—fes 1-1 � I —1 I—III—III=1 I I—I I Min.=Bc+12 1- il DIRE FOU\RATIO\ "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe BElDI\C I\ Compacted Backfill Granular Borrow (MnDOT Spec. 5149A modified) C003 SOILS Compacted — Backfill Bedding Foundation + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / "Bc" Denotes outside diameter of pipe D DE FOU\ RATIO\ / d / / / / Vaa�le/ / 1=111=111=111=111= Minimum PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS 2d+Bc+12" Course Filter Agg. (MnDot Spec. 3149H Modified) �c BE»I\C I\ DOOM SOILS CASTING SCHEDULE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE/RISER GRATE TYPE (NEENAH) REMARKS 2-3, 11, 12C, 13-14 R-3067 STORM CURB INLET 12A -B, 31-32, 61, 71 R-4342 STORM DITCH INLET 1-2, 12, 40-43 R-1642 STORM MANHOLE NOTE: 1. CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTINGS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 2. CASTINGS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY NAME ("STORM SEWER", "SANITARY SEWER") CASTING SCHEDULE NTS RIBBON CURB OR CURB CUT, SEE SITE AND GRADING PLANS GRASS PRE-TREATMENT STRIP OR / PRE-TREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEE UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS UNDISTURBED, UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL NET LESS EROSION BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF BASIN. SLIT BLANKET TO ALLOW PLANT MATERIAL SURFACE IF PLUG PLANTING IS TO BE USED, SEE GRADING AND LANDSCAPE PLANS MIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24" WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME): 70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND 30% ORGANIC COMPOST; FILTRATION MUST CONTAIN LESS THAN 30 MG/KG OF PHOSPHORUS. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING -I I 1-11 X1111-11 3H:1L MAX. SIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING OR LANDSCAPE PLANS SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTH PLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN III= ' I-1 I I-1 I TYPICAL SECTION VIEW NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MnDOT 3733, TYPE 1 - HIGH FLOW RATE) AROUND GRAVEL BLANKET - EXTENDING 1.5' FROM UNDERDRAIN PIPE SIDES - UNDERDRAIN GRAVEL BLANKET 1-1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE (NON LIMESTONE OR CONCRETE MATERIAL) PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PIPE 6" DIAMETER RIGID, PERFORRATED PVC. SEE UTILITY PLAN 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL DOWN -GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. 3. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 4. INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE. 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING. 6. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 7. PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. 8. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. 9. IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. 10. PLANT AND/OR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. 11. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. BIO -FILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) NTS GENERAL NOTES 1. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION. 2. GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW -COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS. 3. ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. e Civil Engineering " Surveying " Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Pr ir 11, AL H 0 w O 0 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 1 0/27/1 7 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 CIVIL DETAILS C5.1 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 504 95_110001, .,P FIJ HAM[ r SLP ACE. IQN 114, en21.E OR N4131A4_( •JRFA'E ,`'0 /FLRP- s +1 -IJ \ HCI AAO:ABLE OR RA 4 ELE SURFACE L" 1), n A+' TIERED fElE`[ID:CLL AR Cl CURB OR GARB 4146 CU'T L' 1 4/50_rL[C roN Jif MED WIEN RIGHT -Ir -FAT Ie: .0E11a144511 YAR, FAL' -.FI.� Elh RECQ ....WAN:, • =T' - 0,172 F -i, T. MAX. e.� OU.05r.:.T R L CGN"RETE S O.U05 f 1.41. 1 '?EF LNIiL) WLI CURD LIR CLAD AND GUTTER SECTION A -A �EF'04401XL 1154nIERED'DIA GOM41. h4' 144' , v4 - -902 FT,IFT. MO LOOhCFLTE sn.164 FT :FT PRE , -FOOT M1 n_4. 009151)11, ARM LEO. ,111!)4511' ,^,3, 2019 uriALN I 9E0016E3 LA1314G - 0,02 1 T.: FT, MAV. SECTION 1]-C1 AN R. q'] '1115.. RE.0l11PEC LATE :II1 C) DARO OR [611111- - 1 2044'+0 E '1-0.477 F1.4=9. MAX- 11/111. AK4111. r'on C -C Y AHI1111JLFIRLS:SEL.LOHRJ5 DEPRESSED cc -Hca 1Y - MALI OHI ` Er 102) ed -TEA 41 VIER URB 1565'' T0P00 "e YE BEEN EVC.-1.4TEB AID DEEMED 15f 0'T': R_ - RA -10X F. APF NC TES, -- LAYJING., SIAL 10:4010 ANI911LIIL IL PLJL IHIAIT ACLL`O1, 1101T E I"RJtl 11AH0L, 14115540004. AT THE TOP EE,FALPS T-41' 414 _ PUHKIN° 51.09_: 5REA TEF THAN ,. , AH3 IT ME 40490445511100 WAV: IS 1 90E951 CRAZE GREATER 'HRC 2%. °!11141 EURE. 14115 LA1)1RGS DULL CON/ail-WC-TEE +1-194 :5 011 -10 3455. OF (LAE,. 50TH 6' FROM TEE BACK, OF 0093 sum THE PREF EARED LIST CCE, 0 .9_T APP. 11:0111 F /WO TH 11n+RAMP 3 19111,1til 11P1 1IVER SSI.` 55,.••351 4.) "URB RAMP LHCJHGS APE REWIRED FCR E ERI 30' OF VERTICAL R111 WHEY THE L,+CIT1EINAL FCA11+150 SLOPE 11 CREATED THAN 31x:. 5041 RAC 10.N JON!.SNALL at tOMSIPUC:TLD ALCM! ALL 0111E: (5.100S W 1 PIN NIC 41.1/4" °LLS VISUAL J5IN-S 50111. BE 15EE T THE )CPS OF CONCRETE F_SRES ADJACENT TO WALT/•BLE SURFACE3. ALL GRADE BRIMS WIT -10 THE PA:A. SHALL BE RERPENDFCULAR '0 TIE '6'H 0- TRAVEL,1TILS 107- `,IrES or A , 1'--, 901 eIrk: sIlirAC ML,T rir ril la: rk1rIL E r'['rr A: 0)4120 W iJ '01 ON. 10 501115// 141114: 411'5 AHI 1511 TAI 1.414100:5 41+1 21,011 1.Y rY [!:1E I:', 14REHIPI35 SHI,.L BE CAST SEPARATELY. MUD. 5'OIWOLN P50505951110511 D TIIL5 WT a&EET S !JO THE ADA SPECIAL PRJ115.,EN5 PRUSECU410H Cr 11590 NADA„ TO. DF CLE95 EH+LL WATCH PREF 03E0 AII,LACEN' WALK 0141,11. 605+1 THE 50_1,2;010a A RICE OR LESS, TIE TDr )- AFD T4,E11 1HALL M}T05 Ti[ 15511P SL0455 10 4.45J01 TECATIrT 23LILE...423'LOPES MOW 941 TOP 14 .54 OF CURB TG THE PAR. 4L_ +0111, TATES HSE d 651141611J 17515 R4411 1151.3-H. A' +11N-1Ul1A WIDTH ° i TA _ W YN11G 15RE00( EC FOR ,1 ftWPB 0 -M1261 W RNIN + @G LL E R A ._ SEIL_L CCI0 :5,0511 T NO A 510 Cr 9' 11 215E PAM 11E TRAVEL. 900 T 1.5 WARWA T 'DYER 1154E NI1105 561 344:1 1,E P TTH IG TIE ENr101 PWT W. T4 02 THE WRLH €TE.T CELE A F:HT_L 050./.3 . E E__ 1:411 ,LE LII 1)149] . WIDTH. ARS 054911 LI PBW]'4_ Ci ILCCAELL riA1NH EIIULI_) 101 =. LfiiLAILII I{UTI :0 ]LEI. +ET1400 41 OE/EC 0154LE %SHIR105 SHA__ BE 5E -&ICI( 1 FROM TIE BAR: OP ;JRB. RADIX - CIE 33E/B ADIALDET3=E/BE WAEFING 5414. 33 EETB4CB 3' MIY041,11 TO E" 1140:111I4 19011 THE BRE) Cf CURB. II 1W -'CH 41100 HEIGHT CCM. a 111111545'+1 6EP111 L1,'101140 1514(950 ACRC•5 TCF OF RAMP. ) ' H10 " LSNIO A A. LUPE, 05112,9" k4, ,4.,H 131-LN,11: LN 0, L T -LRH, 0111-1-TH I1 -H .'4 11.01 01or TREATMENT Lr r V 01 E'71511 s NI e 443 +195951,0 5.1FBS LITER `1101 L LMD H, f5 4: FULL CURE -E001. 51. DSTECT4SLE 364=1E1620 M1 BE PAR OF THE 1 9 LUX LANDIN RSA 'F :T 15 TICE =24271 T 2 nON510,11 T = 1.6140)4C. 34110102 IF TIF OFT5-: i AP. F WAPR Mr k2F+, ` .01 I+ .10 AP 14 PI Pf:HI'EXI11E 1 AM :1 11-1 HANK 11 414 1+1! W 165 113. 11-1.0144 1 CPAC_ 01E10 15 FEF0001CLl0R TO T C D1-ECT(OPI CF TRACE_ :TYPICAL FOR ALL, 11..) WHEN ADJACENT 15 anA5S. 0206111. SHILL ALTAr3 5151 WHEN FE41(101, '1 CLRB, Ir JS_D. 1FPLL BE PLACE 7JT SIDE '01 51°E1ALI 4 T; 9HEN 11OHT OF W4" 411015, EUfh ACJACE4T Tc 111051 5: TI` 15:0 i 2T -oral, I" 151'125 -.OHIO nr 5!`10 CA ER '4 :UR& TO 1E.J:€ TRIPP/11C MCA. S AAD FACJL:T,•TE SNDA 1, 151 5101411140. ▪ 1'11161 TCP 911011 05910E 69E42 PEGIIFSC IC SE CG4.31FUCTIBLE. 41 '4 -LL 60LE 5TH •+4 'S E 11' 901+50 1HAi1 CIL'+ 11E USED FHEN h_. 0THEI FEASIBLE OP'10H"5 FACE BEEN =,,OLUA TEE AK: OL1JF=0 JAI`RPC-150L. 511111. w A ffi '- if f 0•'sE>p MAW ¢Mev 101014 EN LEEEN5 TEE LOWITLED0, ILEPER ICES SHAD. 154 START:C. ,05+ ,161 S,T1 4 1 :,, NA IM I1.6• V 4.,'1 .. 01P '. f + 11101:.1 051514H RAMP SLOPE SHALL 'E E111 EH T11:11 M NI 4141 k - -i1, X 141 T F 111(4+.+run 11:,11.1 APC) HE ). +LuPt SHALL 10) 1700E0 1 ] . (CV 1.141.111.4.1e, -0;1HI 10A SHALL c PIdlel. 7THAN AND LES 1444 IN DIREC :0a: 040111I AAD CROSS 21091 SH L IGT E00EED200 rT":3 L14.031,C APER - d' • Alt 11 X S. 1EY PR'FEP9101 °:1EI15101.3 5140 MA. L .3 2.0: 'anti 141 ALL 5119.1 I N5.LANL.H" SHALL EL 1111 413118 OI 1111409',. HAIti. i 11011 421105' 1-999-201( F-7: TRiAN 1.1 19, RAMP ''FT111 S STANDARD- PLAN 5-297.2 C: 1 OF 6 WA1. NMI r - • FL4/ P.E 111'•. 9,414+ / SLRF,tiCE j4_l0% i (1490)11 0 LhPA]AG CA/AR 1 I 1' =CARE \ •1 14 RI I 01)1ACE )400 - .13121AflC ' 111 'AJEC FLARES AR.IArFi- 03 LAI 9401 F 11:15.FAf.4 L0215116 001-444.L1AETLE r 1 04111 A '411 WALA ABLE SURFACE :LIFE ALL 10139615 CO1.ICRE"E 21115 I r-4 f' i'M140MI354 ,Hl ‘.ri. of PA0505 13. ARES 1EI.,05196 -U 1+ +1-501.RBLE SURr;ACE NM -RAL' ABLE S1.11. -/CE RAMP II ri°H-WALKABLE SURFACE P53ED 11 APF • h- i� `i (? FF-t� �i CE') GRADED 2LA4-ES CEDE 1151::N ': \ SEE PEDE5TR1A5 9PPR3ACH HOSE IL 101 431-W+_NA__ SURF, r A LATTA CURB DE0151. '1 9+055LH19:1+05 ;.AYR J./1'54 6°PRDA'40 1 1011 NON-AALKAOLC 519PACE . / { I?ETUF6;OD CL`1F5 ;5T TRC_C,AL s DE TREATMENT or ais EE IFI HL 151111, eRfRKE04 Jn111ART ,13..6559 QRLi I'C'J___ cr. - KR �,�.. HATCH I4PL0.4:E r SURE M [GAT -.tel- 11)1• INPLACE ▪ _ _ COB 15:00' , 1499.4` -.ems~+'21.1' 14ptr4 3. 1.111 MUM CURB hEIGHT. 49 PREFERRED _- .MEASURED RT FRONT FACE Or C.•1 -515 A 1111". .54 1E1.0111111EA5UFED 4101,1 FLOW LIM€1 1:1" P. h,, i,E-ECTAB_E =ENG= 'hMTII ° CJRB AN: GJTTEP �. ') 141 +r _COTE 09 E.0 CF {AU14L JL10E14011 41+4,544;) h=_'I AT DUL AH f7LIEL:IAHLL 41,014ING DETECTABLE :COE PIITIHOLT CJRB APtJ GUTTER -UI OR -., (1+1:1001 l r 7 i C- try D= L5ITTEF J0- 0R 14::92. IF. 5161151 ALA • � Ef' 7 Ili. r1F .11404400,4 114 SE551041 646 41PF 015[61 ' B 1.1130 H % U 51 •3UTER2. 4 1 VJ PFPFS-RIAN &PPF --OAC-] NOSE I'ETAIL Er tit. 0511.001EL C0'11 5100E IF EAT'AENT' 17 n \ A FACE RAL+ 31 UR CE:°+ R'EOJCCTEI = 1111 CI { :+ LE1LEf ALLA 44Ph1HC5 1H FRE WALK:PA-H 510TF 1IARNINGS ,I I, RJ qp EST 0ROSS141 SURF CE: • '551105544w ';ATL RRM Run f.01_, rfi, ) GATE ARM '•J J ■E= 1 INUSE F, \_l _.__4,E 3.4-1 R;:AT0 PLAN SS . L'7i NG"C5: SEE STANDARD PLATE TOSS 443 1415 SHEET=34R 447Irr0N4L CELLI,.: OH •1116011._LE WARHIH°, A WALKABLE 5355+:: -S 7.1510] AS 4 PAYED 5119=455 ADJACENT IC A :J20 11IP W11 OUT RAISED OBSTACLES 'HAT CLUE MISTRH.EHLY BE ''9'4116 E° BT A USER WHO IS '+55060.4 IMPA:P,EO. GAME T- rI.AU 4.05013115 An.IR:001 70 404.1-1141.In1. r SunrAS . 910110 Or :5455 i4 AN B. LLYIG MEASURE] AL0V. THE P.A1PS =1)44 TIE BACK 761 001.5. n' rim rTIOIIT. Cf; 51111 (100 W12141- 5?:,. 12,,05(3; : FOR A' 05-0551516552094'1.6 H:: CGFB. 0111E TREATKJ4'S ARE AP 15400E TO ALL 91140' "'PC AND SFDL1LD BE I011114EN'E0 AS 1545010 40 FILO '1,11 I AI.. 'HI Holm -e ti 1d Irl¢An I PAM 1',-zlw1N1 .10.1,01 1 If N HI:1 O BC•44 +05 1.11“ AND 541190411.3051105511 PRopERT- CCR151405401ON5. 4716 141FI01111542 54111015LCT1014 IMF}CTS. rs TY'Lcrc r 00540 P5? MEDIANS ANC :SL HEY Y0 SONCRETS SLA FCS ARE PRCP0SC0. rE :3HGR: T AA . 5_I:ALL BC F0RAC0 AHD CDN: 1ULTEO EN ENL LQ eH 10 HE Put 51 011411151, 1141114 Jr E. 114.1.411111 LUUL JE DUNES 1.0. - GE UI TXRCEL E. (7. IF NO I:1IPR AYR r IT FR 15 +11.41315 11 10 141 3.1-0T1i 13. 7FTrl TAPP F 4405.1+11.4 '. 111 01541.11=51.- )1311.. THE [BCE OF 3[16 HOJS 9040110 AHO.'21 11511MI1,055)ARE0 -USE STH T3 FR3110E VISA AL. CONTFA51. II) ALL ':0:65TRL STES 00010 LUST HOVE 4 EDIVIINLCUS CE1(0511LE EDGE FOP T -E ! •4 1 '.PAIRED. 705 135 -ECT OLE E5DE PE LINES. 0211:1ACLE W.FH11i 1111EVA THERE -, 1+_FO 0414 4).- asp. CLFE .41,41. AHL :UNSNARL) A LL LI: IABD LLL 111515: Ili IANLH SIAH- W. 1111 1" 01 11: LC IL 0 111 DETESTABLE WARNINGS 4141 UXIFGPX4i 1555 75 A 3 -INCH 4541.1 44 FE HE -'T, 001 S:UP? 971 PRAT OF A CMEI 1AKER AND LESS 7411 :1 :6 1=1001 15 LIT CON51) 9. L 4 3_r0LII,LE 61016= AND -1FR=FH2 0'1x1 '5 91T 11 6i AlHT: 014 FIR'' 1-Y Tri. ,TAAMIA ry.I DRILL AND GROUT 1 -K. 1 1. P.E:1=34GEME47 BAH 1E9015 6049E0411T1 S 14101. DOVER. Rr1Fl0RCrSlrJ1T 0.303 ARE NOT131-1111-D if -Ir rArr11110111 NO37 15 2011-O"1 INT,f+4A1 6111 Tor v Urn_ Q$ORM I ADD 10.011: 1 - 1 1 1,3 'IAi01 110 103 All H WII 5 110 1:014. 11. N.IRIIHc3r'INI BARS ARE 131' 4E0000 IF 1140 0117.03.2.NCE f5 90JPE0 IYTEG54_ 91-11 HE :OR] +YD 3.1011R. i •,p1E OLA 111111 F1151- .03 311011 SfL 1I13.1 FHL 11, 1 101100510514 1 '01+.1115 LL" LEY[_ 441131 411 HE1C+Fr CLRB ITE, B 1514 RATA 2.32 1 WH UR. -I. WH THE TCA 114)10, 005.51 ES MOPE THAN 1' 54 1C. FULL IE:LHI :UPS '+1 ER TO DEETS. 1 & 2 TO U:_'IF1 HE _J4.6 ,E1.-1 TAPEO5 4Y:' 451(0IAIH P)5LT.1= WILL L0Ahl.1 410160+5.. 15111RE5T 405E Cr EETECTADL£ 69+111;157 02R10551 SPALL BE R.l'E£• 12' A41464J4 13 MANRE141 FRCP TYE. LL61 _51 HAIL, r FII 56:1400 INAltl+tis IN N1) 15+' I IN -L !MALL 1111 LE 1 ANLL WAN N HL 1_ OEE.L5R I HAN =2 MEASLRED PERPENDICULAR 0 TIE NEAREST RAIL, 361 W+E) 51,01517(5410 GATES ARE PROVIDED, OE-ECT.IBLE 449)114( SLPFAC ES SHALL HE ' A': N 1: s,,416 111 1,A1.', 22[1,111 IFR PAN ,:IR1M 1111 l� q 009540 .CJ4HH 00 12 THE CAFE ARM. 1145 0F1TERI1 60/55110 OVER NOTE 421 YS'}4 CR055IR6 568F*CI 05141 0111410 2.14111.111.44.43 PAST THE OIJf51EE EDGE 34 AAL'. C. SHARED -115E RAM ( 43.101,45'01115_ ANC 5_FL T101 15'_41505.. 1050 =AH 35 PEELED TC 2 CA TFC 431GIIT EL Ares. 4j ,STfr4A1R TO FE Pt ACED B.5-YTI1. MOD 1.1 135E OF CIJ'B,'P4/OJ::1 J FA•EC Cr CARL). TRIO] EHSLI33 +1HL. CLEARANCE BET41514 THE SIDEWALK GAD :ATE 4151 C011+TERITEIL-'T 51''ORTS. ,TATE woe) 104I441TER 4RININW 5 1-'/.3-2101 r FTT,rfiTRIAN CI=1E RAMP 'FT541_5i STANDARD FLAN 57797.2E0 4 OF 6 2' 414160 MTV of: { 11' . _ (7 J HCl -W ALRAOLE 1 FFA SL CE 111 1 drJ lel 547.4M. ff1�1 -OTO1. ('p1MR N rl_RFCTTt1Ndl h0V-W,4LNABLE SLIFFACE MCI. . Or CJRB . FLAW F RLN11 UT 1111'EJr If +11144 10T, A}_II. TRAT IT 414,11,1 It11 5141• I+ LESS THAN IH WWII AT TOT' 054 CURB )PSH,[ TOT RAVE CCNGRETE RAHF •10"4* TO 11,106014- 1.401 412 111110 S-,ANi)AEID ONE-EVAI' t'LREv'ZONAL 5) \ `t� RAE/ Cr CIRO ▪ i FLOW -IDE 0 �I 4)54,-11ALRABLE OR AA. 0 7 901 014140E 115 151011, APPRCVE06 40441ART 23, "5011 FRCk1 Q= SOUR R',MP 60 -D 1_0 SLC=..- DIRFCTrcR9!5I R51A1P (VAI KART F FI AFF 1,0TE5: LANDTNC_ :NNE BE 0026TE0 64101 is 1-11 PE6r571+1011 A:CESS 11[0+5 1PA0IC1.Wf.ES 141*00115+1, AT THE TOP OE ROCS THAT HAVE RLNN141 "SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.00, ARL .F THE APPROACHING NR:.I, :5 INVERSE 35100E 1N1T1AL CSR& RUMP LA14011462 =1 ALL BE 10+15TT6C.00 W1T1:1 15 FTICM Tr E BACK OF C IR& WITH 6 FFP. THE 017EE f F 01+11 BE11.0 THE P10FEHRE 150 A[CE, MCI APP10 ABLE 10511 '1£ R4111ML RAP 9011114.5 0101,€ 11 PEP 5.600 5ECM•DAED CURB 504+9 740014055 14 100L1005 909 EAT F0 IC4 OR 4ERT'16.L 91SE 11 EN rlr 1 9JRrn,nTVS RI EFF T' ERrA Tin 14.46FLEE;. CCATR} i GY -DRIP; 01.10.11 COWS )RLC TEE ALONE ALL GRADE 003493 FI -15+1 T1.0 PAR :,1' 31:E SISJAL J014,T0 SHILL 30 J07.0 AT 1954 107 OF Al2 (REAR OE CONCRETE PE5 1CJAC01- TO WALKABLE SURFACES. ILL .1470 BREAK5 111 1114 TIE PAR 914 '- FEFd4d1CLLL AR TC T - 114)11 Ar TRY,' BOTH 15DES Cr 11 1LOPE) 9,51/11I4 SURFACE MUST RE 501441 .4651-. Y SI CT "L. ACC INITIAL CRAPS ARV ]N,IPL 1NALN 5 ARE ARCKA [QHS RI 01, EA 31 6 1GS 51y1 4C 955)SEEP+4111 Y. ('01110 1541) 1 N. 155451. CChiEN- I�A1L` ON `Jff-f G AI( 741E 1)4 *P_CL4L PiMV7. .1'7 [RP7>E 1TIOH CF W'FC1. 'CF OF CURB 011701 MATCH '.110,]015 4000511.1 HILT GRADE. 41 EN RIC &0110[04 0 IS 4 WO: CR LESS, TIE TOP 0r CEEB Arm SHALL 4406:1 T. RAYF .1 01-1,, In IRA IT -IVF. 1015 141011 .:1215 E2 4 1' 10, 11401. 11 NM I , 141 1-01. ALL RAMP T1YES SHOULD "EASE I, '415+15111 7. 104.0 RAMP 1,45+4 1'+11Y14104.4 r101* CF D1-Q02ABLE WARMING I0 P.00 _1HEO •5^ R L PANPa 25512110.( %ARAB/GS 59ALL .OHTIILKIIISL' EATEND FOR A I11Y 01 29" 24 T t7 11111 OF RAVEL OE ELTABLC WAN1I II ir.;L11TJ1 L91 HAL 4.4114 W ET1-4:+. '011 641 L Ell IR+ PAH k1) H JI -HE RALF II EC 4BL WARNING SHOULD BE 6' LESS 1-41 11)6 9411.941- 11ID-11,. ARC CENG 11 Or BA:1AL OCT...TABLE WA1HE11G_5 91)UL) 401' BE 61:41.07 T 111 20 -CET. HAT L. 14. I i V , TF1, 4FF M %:'1 I,f -6 154 LI LEI [ AS,LL HNI L BL 6E1B 141101 C" MAK CI4 IAC HAL SEI '17)54 �d &. C%: FOR RFOq,'.1i1QN R:04PAB1G PECTA1T41LPR DE -55)4805 A'9RMING PLACEMENT. f1, 111211 +LLL Dunn 11015,2. P +113' CURB 4FFJI 055)0 A , 1.01.0 01,664 ,p HIE, EIRE WIE/1 05141 A 100 '540X1. ✓ P 1411@11054 CURB HE0561 45,5 MUN "[STANCE 95°1+95[1 BETWEEN DOMES] a• PREFERRED 7'1111, 005TA111 REQUIRED BET4EEH )DIES). 14) 'IE "64'14" IN &LI'FLLN 1 L RADE5 5110610 NYI1 EL 1N 1 L FAT!! 01 'RA'ILL, 5343/1100 DIPLCUALLAL - RAMPS S TH'322u95 44011191 THE RA149 LECT773N 04 SW19[H RAMP 9: W 7 '9'SSEC :LRNER. ▪ W1EH 4-14,0 CONCRETE 11 PAYED FL R EI Ti, (IIT 11,E 054 C R' T II I.AC RAMPS r1. C0)' '541 4I •', TFFSI. YL MASE IHHI:IUTAI 111 RI AM: 1 H 1 -FI I E 1181 � 1' `4411_ 1141.:///1 LUP ' . MAx, 2:50 15(50 5 GRAD/146 SHALL Ji, BE USED 1189 FEASIBLE, i1 ..JP,B. IF 05ED.101',._ 11 PLACED CU'S1EE THE SIDEW.ILF 2t C / �r t3, LA Ir� UI 5+.L DIREL'IONi 1TISUL 100 L 11, +T HF WA 4.1E 1IS. W02f: 4110520X1 1{ 0111 H: '4+01 � 1412 1= : F 61 MlN-,114 41PF R:=. 047107 &: L:EC °'REF '+ CLFE i1. P.EGLCE TF=PPRIG HkZAR05 4110 FkCIL]S.'. T: 16'50 R [CE a34]1.41. v T 04:5 2.02 ACRE 11. ALL 01515 1:0 E3 &i RrtENV OR GRAM_ SRLAA ARE 093.1'1 10 5134 LINE 10.111 BE C]NSTPUO'ED 10)509 LL ICT- CAFE AND GUTTER, (25 B '1+,5 T 1 i. .: 411_ () Y Y:' LI HI 1'5 1 F4 141.N A11134.0, V ,41 11E4 1 '1 14 Y14F HE IL F110.!,110 1 1 OF EE & TEC'AE114F4 N1011 611 1 BAC' " 4401114 WIEY /aURGERT TO W6LNIBLE E 1V" ' R IY Y +5 SILL1 V{ 11'1 N' A V N 1 :M1111. 'E '.i" 110IL1 .1 • CAR6..6 35541 _E 5161544.0E 15 E5IHEO A A - 1.0E 0+2+11 4 011 450+55 TOA 5050 rU4+' WITIIDLT 151503 035741125 Y Ai _]1400 4050111E+1I BE r?41005 ' 31 R USER 8117 15 11EJALL1 Tl4l. 451, R T+Y411 IETECT+&LE 4.191115165 MA1' BE S.TBAFi u= 1p I' FR 351 TIE DACE 34 -JR& 5]50 COWERS SL 0•:44 UAL' TI -.1H13. 11 `J' '01&4'1, 1 ▪ L L 4 J_. U5L HAG.6L UL1 1.3011 04Hk15165, (P. -I rl+ nlrac-In,n e: 144 . 04111 'Kr T ERB 1 %Ar.r, FARS P ALTS T TCF 54:I 6:9 { 1RB, Tor WTI -Elan, 4)16)15050 SHALL (OAR -HE SATRE 4109)' OF '91E WALK/PA-H.11476 54=54)11, A DETE^'ABL' ERSE AND HELPS 1114644)5 TIE CJRB TATER 0BS"RII1115 THE PAIN OF STSTP1101 190050. 43) TN 7)(P611 04_0 SHA11 BE 09.4161 LID COYSTRL'TE7 PEPPE6C:C1A43 TO 'H€ 141,•:5 CP CLRB, MART AIN 3 6FT1RT10 10:.= OME ANT 0211 OF CON/CSA7F. 0i 1111.1E U5_: '341 L 6. 0:10146 0414:,, L+.YF ROLIRE 411513. AHL P_el. a1. :!,'; 1111 H4CE 11 [11HB. k \• tom_{'fir'_ 1 -- DETECTABLE !APN11M4 PLASEk0VT WhEN rx SETBAG5 29112014 IS 21.511110, fsl CANE. VVAY DISECTIONA_ 'SVITH DETEC1ABLE WARN=1'10 AT @ACK OF CURB CLRB FOS DIRECTIONAL RAMPS e 509:0(11 WALK.� 5' 441411144 01.4E1 AG561041E BASEEiy 1i TT5I :4L SIDEWALK ''ECT ] ON wITHIi I-"1rEP,5E"TION C]F\EP. 1 '0,95.'1 1410E LONC]TJC'I,AL S.DPE 94',5ES 34411 BE THE {TAR17NG PQZH1,:5' 55-5 :39DI'IOH0 9499191.13 1.1010104. 3LGFE.: UP TU 0.1: 61+ ' FLATTER ARE ALL0WC6. [0 DIDICA•ES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOP FALL BE BET 9E111 11111 1.021 4100014 ,vID 4..3 +621111144 M 110 CF.211 SHONH Mau 11116531,5; BLf -I_1. 114O1 0.4)411 (} .11411+,1 LS PLIIL;14140 k 112 SL 1 ALL 111 0,11.119 {` THAN 241 AIC LESS MAN 5.140 1M1 THE CORECi131) 5X0411 ,AHD CROSS SLOPE 5640 N T 2.5154 2.014 / 'L0100I51 CFE1 26.451V61.-'1= PR.71.7F01,4-5 CF 411 1NG LUPE IEI°HT Ctrs s Ai 111 si'A -1017 F=%=1)9144 (51 zF RAMP 'FrYf STAi',ID ARC FLAN 5-297.25C 2 OF 6 Y CJI0B 15+ I LRSEC ION 0' CURE AUJ,,ICLN I 1 0 LAN,5SCA I111PR 4412515 1.11132',MA1 H I DIETS H' 5,J55 ACENT TO Ai1DSCAPE 51106 1511111011' 51114014 1.11 T5 40a2 /14,-51213 l 514'13 41' VILLEIAL L INE LP CSN -F+ 0'E :4 44:T" TILE BACK OF A :JP.B 1'D14. _•:414010 1 !6" CE 4}TC'C _254 ASS PUSH "ON 0 U301 OF 411.104E+4 i. - -I 1401 '0 41.501 ' 54(00 2 ,'-CLFE 11210TCLHIA I':,ll 1.313.3.1 2 51 154141. inmi 11 IHuu LI ✓1144 SE'S -.ON B •B SISNAL PEC==T AL S =USN BETTOR (V CJRB) HETI 'AWN, 4490EDE 6//4114511' ^.0. 6565 V CURB AL'JACLN I 10 HUILL11N0 OR BARriIER -.n0011FTF (-114R 1FS12,,h 4 CURB I HElOI-1 51150 0114Th 11 +1" 1" 9' MlN 55401)46 DIST04CE MOM )+P0-P]5H ,[J1117H 13 ED0' OF "EISEHRL4 11614E "1-01-140454 I4 NIT NOT EYCEED 1T 11E4E5 •r. 0 A@E IHH IfUh�� ., af11N H,n2 1 E' +45'4113. -BY aW LONG. 49i_04QUTEI H PLAY 541..16' STATI7H rJ AL.QW A SCAIAP€ 1514514 -ION. APS AJ5c1 EO11311 P E AC e'410R3 LP W1 COh R TO LO 0 M+i1-_1: 10111') I u0,0 '441LF 117 9.£:1154 A -A PL131- BUT -(1N STATION IV -CURE) sMI-DIP=CTrONAL F:AI'AF' (3,'9.91 5. CIRRI SIT 4.6 CF.. 1' LC4 . RAN9 4091E PL13H BJ -TON 9' FROM THE BACK CF CURB Iif11,'41;IL4 L4LO 1012 40's A'IL ICA .0141 wick_ .11_ 1'4.4 II IE., NL: II USN I1N.E I'#/ I 200 '12551 (1111,74 :015431110 510E4411.+1 +RHEUM (T) 6.14' 14054,`.' _- _ INSET 4- - RAN'STTiICIN PANEL 9,+':55 110TE2- A WALKABLE FARE I5. 4N 8-.06: 004CRE"E FLARE )IA1 IS RE•3J1RE1 WREN TIE FLARE I5 AI 41 10 AAH 1051 11':411 Y P0+ Hf 141.11 6Y 0 P1.1511_JTT5V TRAMER5ES 191 FLARE m1 04 913i9Al-T1 .11931- +23.1 1 5145, 01341677E 43AA 3.434-74- 3114596 1C+f 71' WAY 6..05491+, USE 7 -1 :URB 740.ULD BE 115114151205,.R4]p4G 11046CEHT TIM- 0n 5.3'646 ADUALCHT RAVEMENT 12 PREFERRED. V CURB SHALL ._ FUME OUTSIDE THE 030501.,1 L14ITS WHEN 601HT 0' 1,44 410561, 4 Liffe NEI: -° *41LC[L� SHA__ BE A T' 1113-H AFF,) 09,1501 WATCH P9E11300 TOP CF 612EWAL1 C: 0011OH5. 11159, I VA103.11 9 51541 4140111E 4P1-1 41:5 5108YA+L 13PAl1F5_ ,-1 I 'AT F But-li,A1 1f .11:10:614 ._ Cil 1111:11 02-10112*4 014 Ivk .4.1 ir4A. 91:1 51.1 1:11E9, -00,. W 111 Fr. AAP 024C &REA4ER SMALL 00 1.0001, DET0EE'H 60105036 R. -RUC -111E AID PLACE: A' -CURD. (6 I MAx, 0111 DI 1,,J3s ',NE rEhm,:..1101043 IS 1 Ll'IL k . OI JF ` OE#ALN. P 31CR 61 PERCENT OSS (505351(51,611-0+194+54201-0505101,1(111)111014. PAR 5IOT I5 LF' TER THANE DA. THE 1+1654 1; 01 1P T5 GREATER HANE 5',.210 LYIE 14= NAI. GI ATM 11015101011 141)61+1 @-)2R 01111015 R 411:.5 AFF TO CR IF 41520 AVM) THE +4336,0+ TF 010021,04101116 AOL 11 1H`_ 501 CURD REICH T 41191211 SEC LORI. 165E 15 145 •=FOSS 1CFE 06A'ug 1114 1143:, LCG[I.D 14200 LOR4GITJDAIAL 515PE 1506050 SHALL BE 141E sT}F150 *MIT. 55 SITE :DAD PIONS 141/91HT I]ACITLETHAE .LCFES UP TO 54.35 CR FLA -'TER ARE ALLOWED. 157 THC[CATES PEDE51PE4N RAMP SLOPE INALL BE BET 911H 1T 5214 1;X11-04 5+1I 83n MAXIMUM H THE C R_:TEC41 04100411 MU IR_ 131111SL05' 3,1_1 HDI !1113111 2,0 LANDWG 1;-e i = 4'5+[0 + 1CL 99100 + DI11000005' Jhr yds 2.000 SLCP1 IH ALL 4501210)05,_1510443 SFW,[ INE 54011 YICT 261 l'IC0NI4G PAR5. 05j 56610:11114 PA1EL4S1- T0' BE U'E0 FCR 66NS:1E0N1h' 111E 00625 -SLOP. ,_ 1 1AARA1' 1 J 1 IL 1.51531141, WAL0 01401:..105 = I IIAS ' 1101. SWA1L0 01. 0,5i, PFR. 11041X1 FDO- OF 114111 SEE 1415 SIEET '721 4335+- •ICL ;*-)1440-10H. P9Ar6T P'C=;TRiAN 17.1 ;F. RAMP 52'FT:6i 'STANDARD FLA N MeV OF 0_1 -TER 5+ (41(55+ MET A -1 04^A Or CLRO' FLOW ENE EDE CF WALE 01" PFF 4111 IJ A PFT R Y-:' T n 000+P -fir- Le 1100:2605 TALI •.54()54 r• FP)MT 7 7111).+ 205.4 Ll1E"I 51_2 CI UAW EDGE OF WALK 4-FR5NT 0f GUTTER yin Wil; a„ INSET P -1�1 B./101 01- CURE, FLAIL' .[1$'.--,. Jr ''S- s, (4'I• S t °_ 'J ,L '. -' IN- ' 24" 54107 I G}7 IJ TN• PFPPF`E1TE.11 AR ;�+g, PF[FSTKT.ON ACCF '1 R011 -F CURB GII-TER i7ETOT 41!01 VERTICAL ECCE r.:IST11N: 111 I. PAYE4ENT 1 ]NSE' d - =FRONT CF CUTTER 'd+n 1n 1 1N f4+ 19" w. BALM 11 '•5' ERNE 1 BALK, & 12' "? T 10+4551 .011 1 50 1RR 141FF N S I)FIAA H. 15 AT &ACK OF CJRB 14:9 F. 5121 1145,11111E "1.ACEh1EN An:TIRO TORT .15; j1) 1HEU1FILESS Cf +AMP TIFF) R (5) 2' a TUIMHO.•S 4411111 50114 II 411, • 'EA1EV1 -.I5TING ET. ' 1=61151 \ .\ .9940.1 '15:101: 4LRR1 L)N35R 11 11A`1 ]'+15 A H T5GH dr1 EJTVER: 31T. 'AVER:NI SAISTING WT. u k] (C16/PETE S111 T0. BE 115E11 O+IY W11E9 SPECIFIED IW THS PEA4, 15;. & 1 RE131E & *4511401 '- IT. PAVE11114r 5411,,2L'.I 0266+12-2 PAYr11F6T 0115TTYL 00X101-0 PAWNED1 544•LIIN NISEI 15 OUTFLOW GUTTER ;B, 24' AC I. 5141.4 ALLf_WED PER EPIC11029'5 4FRAINY). PAV[11' ^,T TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & GUTTER FO? USE ON 'CURE RAMP 1?^R01111 ?0 1 1. A l6l140000 . TT "__T P441' TOLD -441555! S _ 71 1.1 .1111'11( il113 ,1 1,3 154 LIFER ,W 1'0 1r1v51RT 11 .:16/2: �5 HLVISl;1I AOA CURB EKTENSIC'5 KI --I COMPOUND R.4T:U5 13:3.=311011 OF TRA1=le 41101 �`VET6 JAMUMI7 23..2011 mom. A. Ha,.. 10119 5 -REE) :BLIMP OUT),'�I SMALL 740815-_�y 1155ICA1 • LARGE rremuo 5\ 20 -TO' TTITIC AL 5 -7705 (COMPOUND RADIUS) 440 FOHDIID SHALL BE PRESENT IA THE PAR_ ps5 USE AT CUR 3 DJT1 MERE ThE PEDESTRIAN 1 SAT1- or TRAVEL /5 ASSLRECI FEFPOV1C4J1.09 10 1-5 FITTER F.ON 131E, RAI& T (4E5 TIT.I.JLE, FER=EID:CJ.44, TIERED FER4E4DIPLAR. PARALLEL, 11-1D DIAGONAL RAREFS. LZ1 9.1R LISE AT 61143 ?APAP5 IRENE THE PEDESTRI VC A ACTH Of FRT .11 IS ASSURE-, PON P-4.47.4-HCLLAFT TO TIE 011 -En -Lao 111,6.1i11412 rES IHDE ADE: I- AMS 110.90055ED 12311014.3 1110364 SUTTER SLOPE TRAISIT:aH OLETS:ZE ET ALL CURB RAICS, C/) T-1E2I 51-A1.1 OD 1.53 oERTICAL DISCCNIIIJ1T:13 :SEATER T I- AN 1/4" ft/ E _EV A ETON CRANDE LANES PLR:: rpOL. '4 41E CA:2124 20 REIN 7P0312 GRITOR. 17.47114 TB usE0 TO MATCH TIE NE11 GL TTER FACE /HT( 99E EA/01.1110 ISDADWAT. TOR I 0. Cr TIE Ca1T-ETE FACE aus.7 OE A FDPICED EOM. PAR GLITTIT 5153-1 145T DC 0;EFLA=1 114 DRILL ATE, GROUT 11A. 4 143r1-10.6525 101.10 -1E 134R1 AT TOT CEITTER Tr, CETTER D410 E011.97.140. CONCRETE TAISTIEETT AUTIU„.1.1 FROTH 6LL 4304111. (10 IELP: 1F041DE 2130 aPARATE RAMPS, RICCOC.a, 7107_ T.aTE SETTEE/ UENG111 AND NININIZES DIREST IONAA CURB. RA1311_,A. 0090,9 C11-0,3LK 113110113 1310 L191441, - 0.310 PA IF THIEt (1-1.1141L190 111193 9,31P 10931 .9 0.1.5T4SET P11.71.14.:: IS 44.41..46LE•Tift E9TENS:C.R3 SHED LC EE CONS1DERED r04 APS INTER -EC 9:3IS WHER, :FACE 11 ..14119n. 2.100 0,11340 MuST TR= APS 091119.10, DES -09/1106 144 THE PUSH BLIT TOD LOCAT1CA DETAIL SHEET. (11 _4:1 105.10 .1251112fi 00714001.1 WALK Ara Ter Or SILL. Q=.9. 1/2- PREFUNDEG JLONT =IL: IF PER MCGEE SRI:, 5•70). 0.41 REME11313.1 1 31111- Al UM -WAIN Ifif1111393.1" 41113 /A. soar mos) 10441.4col 3 OF 6 l' 110S 7414,iLIE,Ii LORE H041; LON+ APPROEID JANUARY /U. 2011 umwor 43T1-506.52195 \ LOOM BOLLEvARD TT1ER=1 PC BITLININ00$ RO 00 41A 11 CONCRETE BOULEVARD F_AGENENT DN BITIWINDUS ROADWAYS FOTEST171,314 RASP TATETTRICI MAW prr3roiTim4 1112/1 TO CR EHM+33 PIC3r3JR TAN 1.,+.14101711,1 7900 1.514 PICTURED PAVEMENT CAN 1407 EETEN3 RITA -11E 1-A CUCH LME. TABLE FE FLDME UNE TO 25 OR AS 1,1CH AS POSSIELE MIRE 43-501,16 1-1 FOU_OWINC CR: 1:011, 4,310 4.4404 R1.4.4. CFA r3All 5-1941-1001.40 AUA FETROFEE1 FOLLOR TILL OVERI.27 CRITERIA .480.40 145HEVER 4.PAWERElf, CARPI": IS DOI: WITH BI-IIMINCJ1 FATCHN: 311 H100.111,0.0 ROADILT15 FILL -CPTH 04.171 IF 1.011 Ur, 3MT 31411111341 19.15.5.-11 0P1 11F IHE 1113.11 1. RAH 51. urrAFAL HD 44 14,3_ 11nm 1 '130110 I/S9 01E1 VIRE-E 3=111F IED I1N ENE FLAIL FOR LSE 11 FLAW RAMP BE-ROF111 GUTTEF FEINFORGEMENT 11 0T MAI 5.1.]9E :AP EI 111A1, n: SHALL EEE ,DRE/ED PL/CED R 41E- r RI AN INDEPENDENT talPIETE POJR, 1011(9 010E6111, RE/NrCRCENENT DETA:LS Ow THIS SHEET 50. ALL SEPARATELY Kan 11,111/AL DRELL 440 :,•-•5449 Ho, 1.2. 1.0610 REINFORCEMENT OARS AT 1E. me 41L,um 5041114 PERIFORCSTIENT REWIRED FOR ALL 101•455461211C4 .1011,11 PITH711 sncan, 1 -ES OPTIONAL CLFEB LITE 1107.FORCEPTENT LETAEL S-OULO CULT BE It) 1, DC PAU/RUED JOINT r:LLEE MATERIAL PER WOOD SPEC. 37.32. Or STANDAR.D FLAN civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-615-0060 Pir y 11, AL LU 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 CIVIL DETAILS C5.2 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. lJ i P � 1 ' s Cl CURB OR GARB 4146 CU'T L' 1 4/50_rL[C roN Jif MED WIEN RIGHT -Ir -FAT Ie: .0E11a144511 YAR, FAL' -.FI.� Elh RECQ ....WAN:, • =T' - 0,172 F -i, T. MAX. e.� OU.05r.:.T R L CGN"RETE S O.U05 f 1.41. 1 '?EF LNIiL) WLI CURD LIR CLAD AND GUTTER SECTION A -A �EF'04401XL 1154nIERED'DIA GOM41. h4' 144' , v4 - -902 FT,IFT. MO LOOhCFLTE sn.164 FT :FT PRE , -FOOT M1 n_4. 009151)11, ARM LEO. ,111!)4511' ,^,3, 2019 uriALN I 9E0016E3 LA1314G - 0,02 1 T.: FT, MAV. SECTION 1]-C1 AN R. q'] '1115.. RE.0l11PEC LATE :II1 C) DARO OR [611111- - 1 2044'+0 E '1-0.477 F1.4=9. MAX- 11/111. AK4111. r'on C -C Y AHI1111JLFIRLS:SEL.LOHRJ5 DEPRESSED cc -Hca 1Y - MALI OHI ` Er 102) ed -TEA 41 VIER URB 1565'' T0P00 "e YE BEEN EVC.-1.4TEB AID DEEMED 15f 0'T': R_ - RA -10X F. APF NC TES, -- LAYJING., SIAL 10:4010 ANI911LIIL IL PLJL IHIAIT ACLL`O1, 1101T E I"RJtl 11AH0L, 14115540004. AT THE TOP EE,FALPS T-41' 414 _ PUHKIN° 51.09_: 5REA TEF THAN ,. , AH3 IT ME 40490445511100 WAV: IS 1 90E951 CRAZE GREATER 'HRC 2%. °!11141 EURE. 14115 LA1)1RGS DULL CON/ail-WC-TEE +1-194 :5 011 -10 3455. OF (LAE,. 50TH 6' FROM TEE BACK, OF 0093 sum THE PREF EARED LIST CCE, 0 .9_T APP. 11:0111 F /WO TH 11n+RAMP 3 19111,1til 11P1 1IVER SSI.` 55,.••351 4.) "URB RAMP LHCJHGS APE REWIRED FCR E ERI 30' OF VERTICAL R111 WHEY THE L,+CIT1EINAL FCA11+150 SLOPE 11 CREATED THAN 31x:. 5041 RAC 10.N JON!.SNALL at tOMSIPUC:TLD ALCM! ALL 0111E: (5.100S W 1 PIN NIC 41.1/4" °LLS VISUAL J5IN-S 50111. BE 15EE T THE )CPS OF CONCRETE F_SRES ADJACENT TO WALT/•BLE SURFACE3. ALL GRADE BRIMS WIT -10 THE PA:A. SHALL BE RERPENDFCULAR '0 TIE '6'H 0- TRAVEL,1TILS 107- `,IrES or A , 1'--, 901 eIrk: sIlirAC ML,T rir ril la: rk1rIL E r'['rr A: 0)4120 W iJ '01 ON. 10 501115// 141114: 411'5 AHI 1511 TAI 1.414100:5 41+1 21,011 1.Y rY [!:1E I:', 14REHIPI35 SHI,.L BE CAST SEPARATELY. MUD. 5'OIWOLN P50505951110511 D TIIL5 WT a&EET S !JO THE ADA SPECIAL PRJ115.,EN5 PRUSECU410H Cr 11590 NADA„ TO. DF CLE95 EH+LL WATCH PREF 03E0 AII,LACEN' WALK 0141,11. 605+1 THE 50_1,2;010a A RICE OR LESS, TIE TDr )- AFD T4,E11 1HALL M}T05 Ti[ 15511P SL0455 10 4.45J01 TECATIrT 23LILE...423'LOPES MOW 941 TOP 14 .54 OF CURB TG THE PAR. 4L_ +0111, TATES HSE d 651141611J 17515 R4411 1151.3-H. A' +11N-1Ul1A WIDTH ° i TA _ W YN11G 15RE00( EC FOR ,1 ftWPB 0 -M1261 W RNIN + @G LL E R A ._ SEIL_L CCI0 :5,0511 T NO A 510 Cr 9' 11 215E PAM 11E TRAVEL. 900 T 1.5 WARWA T 'DYER 1154E NI1105 561 344:1 1,E P TTH IG TIE ENr101 PWT W. T4 02 THE WRLH €TE.T CELE A F:HT_L 050./.3 . E E__ 1:411 ,LE LII 1)149] . WIDTH. ARS 054911 LI PBW]'4_ Ci ILCCAELL riA1NH EIIULI_) 101 =. LfiiLAILII I{UTI :0 ]LEI. +ET1400 41 OE/EC 0154LE %SHIR105 SHA__ BE 5E -&ICI( 1 FROM TIE BAR: OP ;JRB. RADIX - CIE 33E/B ADIALDET3=E/BE WAEFING 5414. 33 EETB4CB 3' MIY041,11 TO E" 1140:111I4 19011 THE BRE) Cf CURB. II 1W -'CH 41100 HEIGHT CCM. a 111111545'+1 6EP111 L1,'101140 1514(950 ACRC•5 TCF OF RAMP. ) ' H10 " LSNIO A A. LUPE, 05112,9" k4, ,4.,H 131-LN,11: LN 0, L T -LRH, 0111-1-TH I1 -H .'4 11.01 01or TREATMENT Lr r V 01 E'71511 s NI e 443 +195951,0 5.1FBS LITER `1101 L LMD H, f5 4: FULL CURE -E001. 51. DSTECT4SLE 364=1E1620 M1 BE PAR OF THE 1 9 LUX LANDIN RSA 'F :T 15 TICE =24271 T 2 nON510,11 T = 1.6140)4C. 34110102 IF TIF OFT5-: i AP. F WAPR Mr k2F+, ` .01 I+ .10 AP 14 PI Pf:HI'EXI11E 1 AM :1 11-1 HANK 11 414 1+1! W 165 113. 11-1.0144 1 CPAC_ 01E10 15 FEF0001CLl0R TO T C D1-ECT(OPI CF TRACE_ :TYPICAL FOR ALL, 11..) WHEN ADJACENT 15 anA5S. 0206111. SHILL ALTAr3 5151 WHEN FE41(101, '1 CLRB, Ir JS_D. 1FPLL BE PLACE 7JT SIDE '01 51°E1ALI 4 T; 9HEN 11OHT OF W4" 411015, EUfh ACJACE4T Tc 111051 5: TI` 15:0 i 2T -oral, I" 151'125 -.OHIO nr 5!`10 CA ER '4 :UR& TO 1E.J:€ TRIPP/11C MCA. S AAD FACJL:T,•TE SNDA 1, 151 5101411140. ▪ 1'11161 TCP 911011 05910E 69E42 PEGIIFSC IC SE CG4.31FUCTIBLE. 41 '4 -LL 60LE 5TH •+4 'S E 11' 901+50 1HAi1 CIL'+ 11E USED FHEN h_. 0THEI FEASIBLE OP'10H"5 FACE BEEN =,,OLUA TEE AK: OL1JF=0 JAI`RPC-150L. 511111. w A ffi '- if f 0•'sE>p MAW ¢Mev 101014 EN LEEEN5 TEE LOWITLED0, ILEPER ICES SHAD. 154 START:C. ,05+ ,161 S,T1 4 1 :,, NA IM I1.6• V 4.,'1 .. 01P '. f + 11101:.1 051514H RAMP SLOPE SHALL 'E E111 EH T11:11 M NI 4141 k - -i1, X 141 T F 111(4+.+run 11:,11.1 APC) HE ). +LuPt SHALL 10) 1700E0 1 ] . (CV 1.141.111.4.1e, -0;1HI 10A SHALL c PIdlel. 7THAN AND LES 1444 IN DIREC :0a: 040111I AAD CROSS 21091 SH L IGT E00EED200 rT":3 L14.031,C APER - d' • Alt 11 X S. 1EY PR'FEP9101 °:1EI15101.3 5140 MA. L .3 2.0: 'anti 141 ALL 5119.1 I N5.LANL.H" SHALL EL 1111 413118 OI 1111409',. HAIti. i 11011 421105' 1-999-201( F-7: TRiAN 1.1 19, RAMP ''FT111 S STANDARD- PLAN 5-297.2 C: 1 OF 6 WA1. NMI r - • FL4/ P.E 111'•. 9,414+ / SLRF,tiCE j4_l0% i (1490)11 0 LhPA]AG CA/AR 1 I 1' =CARE \ •1 14 RI I 01)1ACE )400 - .13121AflC ' 111 'AJEC FLARES AR.IArFi- 03 LAI 9401 F 11:15.FAf.4 L0215116 001-444.L1AETLE r 1 04111 A '411 WALA ABLE SURFACE :LIFE ALL 10139615 CO1.ICRE"E 21115 I r-4 f' i'M140MI354 ,Hl ‘.ri. of PA0505 13. ARES 1EI.,05196 -U 1+ +1-501.RBLE SURr;ACE NM -RAL' ABLE S1.11. -/CE RAMP II ri°H-WALKABLE SURFACE P53ED 11 APF • h- i� `i (? FF-t� �i CE') GRADED 2LA4-ES CEDE 1151::N ': \ SEE PEDE5TR1A5 9PPR3ACH HOSE IL 101 431-W+_NA__ SURF, r A LATTA CURB DE0151. '1 9+055LH19:1+05 ;.AYR J./1'54 6°PRDA'40 1 1011 NON-AALKAOLC 519PACE . / { I?ETUF6;OD CL`1F5 ;5T TRC_C,AL s DE TREATMENT or ais EE IFI HL 151111, eRfRKE04 Jn111ART ,13..6559 QRLi I'C'J___ cr. - KR �,�.. HATCH I4PL0.4:E r SURE M [GAT -.tel- 11)1• INPLACE ▪ _ _ COB 15:00' , 1499.4` -.ems~+'21.1' 14ptr4 3. 1.111 MUM CURB hEIGHT. 49 PREFERRED _- .MEASURED RT FRONT FACE Or C.•1 -515 A 1111". .54 1E1.0111111EA5UFED 4101,1 FLOW LIM€1 1:1" P. h,, i,E-ECTAB_E =ENG= 'hMTII ° CJRB AN: GJTTEP �. ') 141 +r _COTE 09 E.0 CF {AU14L JL10E14011 41+4,544;) h=_'I AT DUL AH f7LIEL:IAHLL 41,014ING DETECTABLE :COE PIITIHOLT CJRB APtJ GUTTER -UI OR -., (1+1:1001 l r 7 i C- try D= L5ITTEF J0- 0R 14::92. IF. 5161151 ALA • � Ef' 7 Ili. r1F .11404400,4 114 SE551041 646 41PF 015[61 ' B 1.1130 H % U 51 •3UTER2. 4 1 VJ PFPFS-RIAN &PPF --OAC-] NOSE I'ETAIL Er tit. 0511.001EL C0'11 5100E IF EAT'AENT' 17 n \ A FACE RAL+ 31 UR CE:°+ R'EOJCCTEI = 1111 CI { :+ LE1LEf ALLA 44Ph1HC5 1H FRE WALK:PA-H 510TF 1IARNINGS ,I I, RJ qp EST 0ROSS141 SURF CE: • '551105544w ';ATL RRM Run f.01_, rfi, ) GATE ARM '•J J ■E= 1 INUSE F, \_l _.__4,E 3.4-1 R;:AT0 PLAN SS . L'7i NG"C5: SEE STANDARD PLATE TOSS 443 1415 SHEET=34R 447Irr0N4L CELLI,.: OH •1116011._LE WARHIH°, A WALKABLE 5355+:: -S 7.1510] AS 4 PAYED 5119=455 ADJACENT IC A :J20 11IP W11 OUT RAISED OBSTACLES 'HAT CLUE MISTRH.EHLY BE ''9'4116 E° BT A USER WHO IS '+55060.4 IMPA:P,EO. GAME T- rI.AU 4.05013115 An.IR:001 70 404.1-1141.In1. r SunrAS . 910110 Or :5455 i4 AN B. LLYIG MEASURE] AL0V. THE P.A1PS =1)44 TIE BACK 761 001.5. n' rim rTIOIIT. Cf; 51111 (100 W12141- 5?:,. 12,,05(3; : FOR A' 05-0551516552094'1.6 H:: CGFB. 0111E TREATKJ4'S ARE AP 15400E TO ALL 91140' "'PC AND SFDL1LD BE I011114EN'E0 AS 1545010 40 FILO '1,11 I AI.. 'HI Holm -e ti 1d Irl¢An I PAM 1',-zlw1N1 .10.1,01 1 If N HI:1 O BC•44 +05 1.11“ AND 541190411.3051105511 PRopERT- CCR151405401ON5. 4716 141FI01111542 54111015LCT1014 IMF}CTS. rs TY'Lcrc r 00540 P5? MEDIANS ANC :SL HEY Y0 SONCRETS SLA FCS ARE PRCP0SC0. rE :3HGR: T AA . 5_I:ALL BC F0RAC0 AHD CDN: 1ULTEO EN ENL LQ eH 10 HE Put 51 011411151, 1141114 Jr E. 114.1.411111 LUUL JE DUNES 1.0. - GE UI TXRCEL E. (7. IF NO I:1IPR AYR r IT FR 15 +11.41315 11 10 141 3.1-0T1i 13. 7FTrl TAPP F 4405.1+11.4 '. 111 01541.11=51.- )1311.. THE [BCE OF 3[16 HOJS 9040110 AHO.'21 11511MI1,055)ARE0 -USE STH T3 FR3110E VISA AL. CONTFA51. II) ALL ':0:65TRL STES 00010 LUST HOVE 4 EDIVIINLCUS CE1(0511LE EDGE FOP T -E ! •4 1 '.PAIRED. 705 135 -ECT OLE E5DE PE LINES. 0211:1ACLE W.FH11i 1111EVA THERE -, 1+_FO 0414 4).- asp. CLFE .41,41. AHL :UNSNARL) A LL LI: IABD LLL 111515: Ili IANLH SIAH- W. 1111 1" 01 11: LC IL 0 111 DETESTABLE WARNINGS 4141 UXIFGPX4i 1555 75 A 3 -INCH 4541.1 44 FE HE -'T, 001 S:UP? 971 PRAT OF A CMEI 1AKER AND LESS 7411 :1 :6 1=1001 15 LIT CON51) 9. L 4 3_r0LII,LE 61016= AND -1FR=FH2 0'1x1 '5 91T 11 6i AlHT: 014 FIR'' 1-Y Tri. ,TAAMIA ry.I DRILL AND GROUT 1 -K. 1 1. P.E:1=34GEME47 BAH 1E9015 6049E0411T1 S 14101. DOVER. Rr1Fl0RCrSlrJ1T 0.303 ARE NOT131-1111-D if -Ir rArr11110111 NO37 15 2011-O"1 INT,f+4A1 6111 Tor v Urn_ Q$ORM I ADD 10.011: 1 - 1 1 1,3 'IAi01 110 103 All H WII 5 110 1:014. 11. N.IRIIHc3r'INI BARS ARE 131' 4E0000 IF 1140 0117.03.2.NCE f5 90JPE0 IYTEG54_ 91-11 HE :OR] +YD 3.1011R. i •,p1E OLA 111111 F1151- .03 311011 SfL 1I13.1 FHL 11, 1 101100510514 1 '01+.1115 LL" LEY[_ 441131 411 HE1C+Fr CLRB ITE, B 1514 RATA 2.32 1 WH UR. -I. WH THE TCA 114)10, 005.51 ES MOPE THAN 1' 54 1C. FULL IE:LHI :UPS '+1 ER TO DEETS. 1 & 2 TO U:_'IF1 HE _J4.6 ,E1.-1 TAPEO5 4Y:' 451(0IAIH P)5LT.1= WILL L0Ahl.1 410160+5.. 15111RE5T 405E Cr EETECTADL£ 69+111;157 02R10551 SPALL BE R.l'E£• 12' A41464J4 13 MANRE141 FRCP TYE. LL61 _51 HAIL, r FII 56:1400 INAltl+tis IN N1) 15+' I IN -L !MALL 1111 LE 1 ANLL WAN N HL 1_ OEE.L5R I HAN =2 MEASLRED PERPENDICULAR 0 TIE NEAREST RAIL, 361 W+E) 51,01517(5410 GATES ARE PROVIDED, OE-ECT.IBLE 449)114( SLPFAC ES SHALL HE ' A': N 1: s,,416 111 1,A1.', 22[1,111 IFR PAN ,:IR1M 1111 l� q 009540 .CJ4HH 00 12 THE CAFE ARM. 1145 0F1TERI1 60/55110 OVER NOTE 421 YS'}4 CR055IR6 568F*CI 05141 0111410 2.14111.111.44.43 PAST THE OIJf51EE EDGE 34 AAL'. C. SHARED -115E RAM ( 43.101,45'01115_ ANC 5_FL T101 15'_41505.. 1050 =AH 35 PEELED TC 2 CA TFC 431GIIT EL Ares. 4j ,STfr4A1R TO FE Pt ACED B.5-YTI1. MOD 1.1 135E OF CIJ'B,'P4/OJ::1 J FA•EC Cr CARL). TRIO] EHSLI33 +1HL. CLEARANCE BET41514 THE SIDEWALK GAD :ATE 4151 C011+TERITEIL-'T 51''ORTS. ,TATE woe) 104I441TER 4RININW 5 1-'/.3-2101 r FTT,rfiTRIAN CI=1E RAMP 'FT541_5i STANDARD FLAN 57797.2E0 4 OF 6 2' 414160 MTV of: { 11' . _ (7 J HCl -W ALRAOLE 1 FFA SL CE 111 1 drJ lel 547.4M. ff1�1 -OTO1. ('p1MR N rl_RFCTTt1Ndl h0V-W,4LNABLE SLIFFACE MCI. . Or CJRB . FLAW F RLN11 UT 1111'EJr If +11144 10T, A}_II. TRAT IT 414,11,1 It11 5141• I+ LESS THAN IH WWII AT TOT' 054 CURB )PSH,[ TOT RAVE CCNGRETE RAHF •10"4* TO 11,106014- 1.401 412 111110 S-,ANi)AEID ONE-EVAI' t'LREv'ZONAL 5) \ `t� RAE/ Cr CIRO ▪ i FLOW -IDE 0 �I 4)54,-11ALRABLE OR AA. 0 7 901 014140E 115 151011, APPRCVE06 40441ART 23, "5011 FRCk1 Q= SOUR R',MP 60 -D 1_0 SLC=..- DIRFCTrcR9!5I R51A1P (VAI KART F FI AFF 1,0TE5: LANDTNC_ :NNE BE 0026TE0 64101 is 1-11 PE6r571+1011 A:CESS 11[0+5 1PA0IC1.Wf.ES 141*00115+1, AT THE TOP OE ROCS THAT HAVE RLNN141 "SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.00, ARL .F THE APPROACHING NR:.I, :5 INVERSE 35100E 1N1T1AL CSR& RUMP LA14011462 =1 ALL BE 10+15TT6C.00 W1T1:1 15 FTICM Tr E BACK OF C IR& WITH 6 FFP. THE 017EE f F 01+11 BE11.0 THE P10FEHRE 150 A[CE, MCI APP10 ABLE 10511 '1£ R4111ML RAP 9011114.5 0101,€ 11 PEP 5.600 5ECM•DAED CURB 504+9 740014055 14 100L1005 909 EAT F0 IC4 OR 4ERT'16.L 91SE 11 EN rlr 1 9JRrn,nTVS RI EFF T' ERrA Tin 14.46FLEE;. CCATR} i GY -DRIP; 01.10.11 COWS )RLC TEE ALONE ALL GRADE 003493 FI -15+1 T1.0 PAR :,1' 31:E SISJAL J014,T0 SHILL 30 J07.0 AT 1954 107 OF Al2 (REAR OE CONCRETE PE5 1CJAC01- TO WALKABLE SURFACES. ILL .1470 BREAK5 111 1114 TIE PAR 914 '- FEFd4d1CLLL AR TC T - 114)11 Ar TRY,' BOTH 15DES Cr 11 1LOPE) 9,51/11I4 SURFACE MUST RE 501441 .4651-. Y SI CT "L. ACC INITIAL CRAPS ARV ]N,IPL 1NALN 5 ARE ARCKA [QHS RI 01, EA 31 6 1GS 51y1 4C 955)SEEP+4111 Y. ('01110 1541) 1 N. 155451. CChiEN- I�A1L` ON `Jff-f G AI( 741E 1)4 *P_CL4L PiMV7. .1'7 [RP7>E 1TIOH CF W'FC1. 'CF OF CURB 011701 MATCH '.110,]015 4000511.1 HILT GRADE. 41 EN RIC &0110[04 0 IS 4 WO: CR LESS, TIE TOP 0r CEEB Arm SHALL 4406:1 T. RAYF .1 01-1,, In IRA IT -IVF. 1015 141011 .:1215 E2 4 1' 10, 11401. 11 NM I , 141 1-01. ALL RAMP T1YES SHOULD "EASE I, '415+15111 7. 104.0 RAMP 1,45+4 1'+11Y14104.4 r101* CF D1-Q02ABLE WARMING I0 P.00 _1HEO •5^ R L PANPa 25512110.( %ARAB/GS 59ALL .OHTIILKIIISL' EATEND FOR A I11Y 01 29" 24 T t7 11111 OF RAVEL OE ELTABLC WAN1I II ir.;L11TJ1 L91 HAL 4.4114 W ET1-4:+. '011 641 L Ell IR+ PAH k1) H JI -HE RALF II EC 4BL WARNING SHOULD BE 6' LESS 1-41 11)6 9411.941- 11ID-11,. ARC CENG 11 Or BA:1AL OCT...TABLE WA1HE11G_5 91)UL) 401' BE 61:41.07 T 111 20 -CET. HAT L. 14. I i V , TF1, 4FF M %:'1 I,f -6 154 LI LEI [ AS,LL HNI L BL 6E1B 141101 C" MAK CI4 IAC HAL SEI '17)54 �d &. C%: FOR RFOq,'.1i1QN R:04PAB1G PECTA1T41LPR DE -55)4805 A'9RMING PLACEMENT. f1, 111211 +LLL Dunn 11015,2. P +113' CURB 4FFJI 055)0 A , 1.01.0 01,664 ,p HIE, EIRE WIE/1 05141 A 100 '540X1. ✓ P 1411@11054 CURB HE0561 45,5 MUN "[STANCE 95°1+95[1 BETWEEN DOMES] a• PREFERRED 7'1111, 005TA111 REQUIRED BET4EEH )DIES). 14) 'IE "64'14" IN &LI'FLLN 1 L RADE5 5110610 NYI1 EL 1N 1 L FAT!! 01 'RA'ILL, 5343/1100 DIPLCUALLAL - RAMPS S TH'322u95 44011191 THE RA149 LECT773N 04 SW19[H RAMP 9: W 7 '9'SSEC :LRNER. ▪ W1EH 4-14,0 CONCRETE 11 PAYED FL R EI Ti, (IIT 11,E 054 C R' T II I.AC RAMPS r1. C0)' '541 4I •', TFFSI. YL MASE IHHI:IUTAI 111 RI AM: 1 H 1 -FI I E 1181 � 1' `4411_ 1141.:///1 LUP ' . MAx, 2:50 15(50 5 GRAD/146 SHALL Ji, BE USED 1189 FEASIBLE, i1 ..JP,B. IF 05ED.101',._ 11 PLACED CU'S1EE THE SIDEW.ILF 2t C / �r t3, LA Ir� UI 5+.L DIREL'IONi 1TISUL 100 L 11, +T HF WA 4.1E 1IS. W02f: 4110520X1 1{ 0111 H: '4+01 � 1412 1= : F 61 MlN-,114 41PF R:=. 047107 &: L:EC °'REF '+ CLFE i1. P.EGLCE TF=PPRIG HkZAR05 4110 FkCIL]S.'. T: 16'50 R [CE a34]1.41. v T 04:5 2.02 ACRE 11. ALL 01515 1:0 E3 &i RrtENV OR GRAM_ SRLAA ARE 093.1'1 10 5134 LINE 10.111 BE C]NSTPUO'ED 10)509 LL ICT- CAFE AND GUTTER, (25 B '1+,5 T 1 i. .: 411_ () Y Y:' LI HI 1'5 1 F4 141.N A11134.0, V ,41 11E4 1 '1 14 Y14F HE IL F110.!,110 1 1 OF EE & TEC'AE114F4 N1011 611 1 BAC' " 4401114 WIEY /aURGERT TO W6LNIBLE E 1V" ' R IY Y +5 SILL1 V{ 11'1 N' A V N 1 :M1111. 'E '.i" 110IL1 .1 • CAR6..6 35541 _E 5161544.0E 15 E5IHEO A A - 1.0E 0+2+11 4 011 450+55 TOA 5050 rU4+' WITIIDLT 151503 035741125 Y Ai _]1400 4050111E+1I BE r?41005 ' 31 R USER 8117 15 11EJALL1 Tl4l. 451, R T+Y411 IETECT+&LE 4.191115165 MA1' BE S.TBAFi u= 1p I' FR 351 TIE DACE 34 -JR& 5]50 COWERS SL 0•:44 UAL' TI -.1H13. 11 `J' '01&4'1, 1 ▪ L L 4 J_. U5L HAG.6L UL1 1.3011 04Hk15165, (P. -I rl+ nlrac-In,n e: 144 . 04111 'Kr T ERB 1 %Ar.r, FARS P ALTS T TCF 54:I 6:9 { 1RB, Tor WTI -Elan, 4)16)15050 SHALL (OAR -HE SATRE 4109)' OF '91E WALK/PA-H.11476 54=54)11, A DETE^'ABL' ERSE AND HELPS 1114644)5 TIE CJRB TATER 0BS"RII1115 THE PAIN OF STSTP1101 190050. 43) TN 7)(P611 04_0 SHA11 BE 09.4161 LID COYSTRL'TE7 PEPPE6C:C1A43 TO 'H€ 141,•:5 CP CLRB, MART AIN 3 6FT1RT10 10:.= OME ANT 0211 OF CON/CSA7F. 0i 1111.1E U5_: '341 L 6. 0:10146 0414:,, L+.YF ROLIRE 411513. AHL P_el. a1. :!,'; 1111 H4CE 11 [11HB. k \• tom_{'fir'_ 1 -- DETECTABLE !APN11M4 PLASEk0VT WhEN rx SETBAG5 29112014 IS 21.511110, fsl CANE. VVAY DISECTIONA_ 'SVITH DETEC1ABLE WARN=1'10 AT @ACK OF CURB CLRB FOS DIRECTIONAL RAMPS e 509:0(11 WALK.� 5' 441411144 01.4E1 AG561041E BASEEiy 1i TT5I :4L SIDEWALK ''ECT ] ON wITHIi I-"1rEP,5E"TION C]F\EP. 1 '0,95.'1 1410E LONC]TJC'I,AL S.DPE 94',5ES 34411 BE THE {TAR17NG PQZH1,:5' 55-5 :39DI'IOH0 9499191.13 1.1010104. 3LGFE.: UP TU 0.1: 61+ ' FLATTER ARE ALL0WC6. [0 DIDICA•ES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOP FALL BE BET 9E111 11111 1.021 4100014 ,vID 4..3 +621111144 M 110 CF.211 SHONH Mau 11116531,5; BLf -I_1. 114O1 0.4)411 (} .11411+,1 LS PLIIL;14140 k 112 SL 1 ALL 111 0,11.119 {` THAN 241 AIC LESS MAN 5.140 1M1 THE CORECi131) 5X0411 ,AHD CROSS SLOPE 5640 N T 2.5154 2.014 / 'L0100I51 CFE1 26.451V61.-'1= PR.71.7F01,4-5 CF 411 1NG LUPE IEI°HT Ctrs s Ai 111 si'A -1017 F=%=1)9144 (51 zF RAMP 'FrYf STAi',ID ARC FLAN 5-297.25C 2 OF 6 Y CJI0B 15+ I LRSEC ION 0' CURE AUJ,,ICLN I 1 0 LAN,5SCA I111PR 4412515 1.11132',MA1 H I DIETS H' 5,J55 ACENT TO Ai1DSCAPE 51106 1511111011' 51114014 1.11 T5 40a2 /14,-51213 l 514'13 41' VILLEIAL L INE LP CSN -F+ 0'E :4 44:T" TILE BACK OF A :JP.B 1'D14. _•:414010 1 !6" CE 4}TC'C _254 ASS PUSH "ON 0 U301 OF 411.104E+4 i. - -I 1401 '0 41.501 ' 54(00 2 ,'-CLFE 11210TCLHIA I':,ll 1.313.3.1 2 51 154141. inmi 11 IHuu LI ✓1144 SE'S -.ON B •B SISNAL PEC==T AL S =USN BETTOR (V CJRB) HETI 'AWN, 4490EDE 6//4114511' ^.0. 6565 V CURB AL'JACLN I 10 HUILL11N0 OR BARriIER -.n0011FTF (-114R 1FS12,,h 4 CURB I HElOI-1 51150 0114Th 11 +1" 1" 9' MlN 55401)46 DIST04CE MOM )+P0-P]5H ,[J1117H 13 ED0' OF "EISEHRL4 11614E "1-01-140454 I4 NIT NOT EYCEED 1T 11E4E5 •r. 0 A@E IHH IfUh�� ., af11N H,n2 1 E' +45'4113. -BY aW LONG. 49i_04QUTEI H PLAY 541..16' STATI7H rJ AL.QW A SCAIAP€ 1514514 -ION. APS AJ5c1 EO11311 P E AC e'410R3 LP W1 COh R TO LO 0 M+i1-_1: 10111') I u0,0 '441LF 117 9.£:1154 A -A PL131- BUT -(1N STATION IV -CURE) sMI-DIP=CTrONAL F:AI'AF' (3,'9.91 5. CIRRI SIT 4.6 CF.. 1' LC4 . RAN9 4091E PL13H BJ -TON 9' FROM THE BACK CF CURB Iif11,'41;IL4 L4LO 1012 40's A'IL ICA .0141 wick_ .11_ 1'4.4 II IE., NL: II USN I1N.E I'#/ I 200 '12551 (1111,74 :015431110 510E4411.+1 +RHEUM (T) 6.14' 14054,`.' _- _ INSET 4- - RAN'STTiICIN PANEL 9,+':55 110TE2- A WALKABLE FARE I5. 4N 8-.06: 004CRE"E FLARE )IA1 IS RE•3J1RE1 WREN TIE FLARE I5 AI 41 10 AAH 1051 11':411 Y P0+ Hf 141.11 6Y 0 P1.1511_JTT5V TRAMER5ES 191 FLARE m1 04 913i9Al-T1 .11931- +23.1 1 5145, 01341677E 43AA 3.434-74- 3114596 1C+f 71' WAY 6..05491+, USE 7 -1 :URB 740.ULD BE 115114151205,.R4]p4G 11046CEHT TIM- 0n 5.3'646 ADUALCHT RAVEMENT 12 PREFERRED. V CURB SHALL ._ FUME OUTSIDE THE 030501.,1 L14ITS WHEN 601HT 0' 1,44 410561, 4 Liffe NEI: -° *41LC[L� SHA__ BE A T' 1113-H AFF,) 09,1501 WATCH P9E11300 TOP CF 612EWAL1 C: 0011OH5. 11159, I VA103.11 9 51541 4140111E 4P1-1 41:5 5108YA+L 13PAl1F5_ ,-1 I 'AT F But-li,A1 1f .11:10:614 ._ Cil 1111:11 02-10112*4 014 Ivk .4.1 ir4A. 91:1 51.1 1:11E9, -00,. W 111 Fr. AAP 024C &REA4ER SMALL 00 1.0001, DET0EE'H 60105036 R. -RUC -111E AID PLACE: A' -CURD. (6 I MAx, 0111 DI 1,,J3s ',NE rEhm,:..1101043 IS 1 Ll'IL k . OI JF ` OE#ALN. P 31CR 61 PERCENT OSS (505351(51,611-0+194+54201-0505101,1(111)111014. PAR 5IOT I5 LF' TER THANE DA. THE 1+1654 1; 01 1P T5 GREATER HANE 5',.210 LYIE 14= NAI. GI ATM 11015101011 141)61+1 @-)2R 01111015 R 411:.5 AFF TO CR IF 41520 AVM) THE +4336,0+ TF 010021,04101116 AOL 11 1H`_ 501 CURD REICH T 41191211 SEC LORI. 165E 15 145 •=FOSS 1CFE 06A'ug 1114 1143:, LCG[I.D 14200 LOR4GITJDAIAL 515PE 1506050 SHALL BE 141E sT}F150 *MIT. 55 SITE :DAD PIONS 141/91HT I]ACITLETHAE .LCFES UP TO 54.35 CR FLA -'TER ARE ALLOWED. 157 THC[CATES PEDE51PE4N RAMP SLOPE INALL BE BET 911H 1T 5214 1;X11-04 5+1I 83n MAXIMUM H THE C R_:TEC41 04100411 MU IR_ 131111SL05' 3,1_1 HDI !1113111 2,0 LANDWG 1;-e i = 4'5+[0 + 1CL 99100 + DI11000005' Jhr yds 2.000 SLCP1 IH ALL 4501210)05,_1510443 SFW,[ INE 54011 YICT 261 l'IC0NI4G PAR5. 05j 56610:11114 PA1EL4S1- T0' BE U'E0 FCR 66NS:1E0N1h' 111E 00625 -SLOP. ,_ 1 1AARA1' 1 J 1 IL 1.51531141, WAL0 01401:..105 = I IIAS ' 1101. SWA1L0 01. 0,5i, PFR. 11041X1 FDO- OF 114111 SEE 1415 SIEET '721 4335+- •ICL ;*-)1440-10H. P9Ar6T P'C=;TRiAN 17.1 ;F. RAMP 52'FT:6i 'STANDARD FLA N MeV OF 0_1 -TER 5+ (41(55+ MET A -1 04^A Or CLRO' FLOW ENE EDE CF WALE 01" PFF 4111 IJ A PFT R Y-:' T n 000+P -fir- Le 1100:2605 TALI •.54()54 r• FP)MT 7 7111).+ 205.4 Ll1E"I 51_2 CI UAW EDGE OF WALK 4-FR5NT 0f GUTTER yin Wil; a„ INSET P -1�1 B./101 01- CURE, FLAIL' .[1$'.--,. Jr ''S- s, (4'I• S t °_ 'J ,L '. -' IN- ' 24" 54107 I G}7 IJ TN• PFPPF`E1TE.11 AR ;�+g, PF[FSTKT.ON ACCF '1 R011 -F CURB GII-TER i7ETOT 41!01 VERTICAL ECCE r.:IST11N: 111 I. PAYE4ENT 1 ]NSE' d - =FRONT CF CUTTER 'd+n 1n 1 1N f4+ 19" w. BALM 11 '•5' ERNE 1 BALK, & 12' "? T 10+4551 .011 1 50 1RR 141FF N S I)FIAA H. 15 AT &ACK OF CJRB 14:9 F. 5121 1145,11111E "1.ACEh1EN An:TIRO TORT .15; j1) 1HEU1FILESS Cf +AMP TIFF) R (5) 2' a TUIMHO.•S 4411111 50114 II 411, • 'EA1EV1 -.I5TING ET. ' 1=61151 \ .\ .9940.1 '15:101: 4LRR1 L)N35R 11 11A`1 ]'+15 A H T5GH dr1 EJTVER: 31T. 'AVER:NI SAISTING WT. u k] (C16/PETE S111 T0. BE 115E11 O+IY W11E9 SPECIFIED IW THS PEA4, 15;. & 1 RE131E & *4511401 '- IT. PAVE11114r 5411,,2L'.I 0266+12-2 PAYr11F6T 0115TTYL 00X101-0 PAWNED1 544•LIIN NISEI 15 OUTFLOW GUTTER ;B, 24' AC I. 5141.4 ALLf_WED PER EPIC11029'5 4FRAINY). PAV[11' ^,T TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & GUTTER FO? USE ON 'CURE RAMP 1?^R01111 ?0 1 1. A l6l140000 . TT "__T P441' TOLD -441555! S _ 71 1.1 .1111'11( il113 ,1 1,3 154 LIFER ,W 1'0 1r1v51RT 11 .:16/2: �5 HLVISl;1I AOA CURB EKTENSIC'5 KI --I COMPOUND R.4T:U5 13:3.=311011 OF TRA1=le 41101 �`VET6 JAMUMI7 23..2011 mom. A. Ha,.. 10119 5 -REE) :BLIMP OUT),'�I SMALL 740815-_�y 1155ICA1 • LARGE rremuo 5\ 20 -TO' TTITIC AL 5 -7705 (COMPOUND RADIUS) 440 FOHDIID SHALL BE PRESENT IA THE PAR_ ps5 USE AT CUR 3 DJT1 MERE ThE PEDESTRIAN 1 SAT1- or TRAVEL /5 ASSLRECI FEFPOV1C4J1.09 10 1-5 FITTER F.ON 131E, RAI& T (4E5 TIT.I.JLE, FER=EID:CJ.44, TIERED FER4E4DIPLAR. PARALLEL, 11-1D DIAGONAL RAREFS. LZ1 9.1R LISE AT 61143 ?APAP5 IRENE THE PEDESTRI VC A ACTH Of FRT .11 IS ASSURE-, PON P-4.47.4-HCLLAFT TO TIE 011 -En -Lao 111,6.1i11412 rES IHDE ADE: I- AMS 110.90055ED 12311014.3 1110364 SUTTER SLOPE TRAISIT:aH OLETS:ZE ET ALL CURB RAICS, C/) T-1E2I 51-A1.1 OD 1.53 oERTICAL DISCCNIIIJ1T:13 :SEATER T I- AN 1/4" ft/ E _EV A ETON CRANDE LANES PLR:: rpOL. '4 41E CA:2124 20 REIN 7P0312 GRITOR. 17.47114 TB usE0 TO MATCH TIE NE11 GL TTER FACE /HT( 99E EA/01.1110 ISDADWAT. TOR I 0. Cr TIE Ca1T-ETE FACE aus.7 OE A FDPICED EOM. PAR GLITTIT 5153-1 145T DC 0;EFLA=1 114 DRILL ATE, GROUT 11A. 4 143r1-10.6525 101.10 -1E 134R1 AT TOT CEITTER Tr, CETTER D410 E011.97.140. CONCRETE TAISTIEETT AUTIU„.1.1 FROTH 6LL 4304111. (10 IELP: 1F041DE 2130 aPARATE RAMPS, RICCOC.a, 7107_ T.aTE SETTEE/ UENG111 AND NININIZES DIREST IONAA CURB. RA1311_,A. 0090,9 C11-0,3LK 113110113 1310 L191441, - 0.310 PA IF THIEt (1-1.1141L190 111193 9,31P 10931 .9 0.1.5T4SET P11.71.14.:: IS 44.41..46LE•Tift E9TENS:C.R3 SHED LC EE CONS1DERED r04 APS INTER -EC 9:3IS WHER, :FACE 11 ..14119n. 2.100 0,11340 MuST TR= APS 091119.10, DES -09/1106 144 THE PUSH BLIT TOD LOCAT1CA DETAIL SHEET. (11 _4:1 105.10 .1251112fi 00714001.1 WALK Ara Ter Or SILL. Q=.9. 1/2- PREFUNDEG JLONT =IL: IF PER MCGEE SRI:, 5•70). 0.41 REME11313.1 1 31111- Al UM -WAIN Ifif1111393.1" 41113 /A. soar mos) 10441.4col 3 OF 6 l' 110S 7414,iLIE,Ii LORE H041; LON+ APPROEID JANUARY /U. 2011 umwor 43T1-506.52195 \ LOOM BOLLEvARD TT1ER=1 PC BITLININ00$ RO 00 41A 11 CONCRETE BOULEVARD F_AGENENT DN BITIWINDUS ROADWAYS FOTEST171,314 RASP TATETTRICI MAW prr3roiTim4 1112/1 TO CR EHM+33 PIC3r3JR TAN 1.,+.14101711,1 7900 1.514 PICTURED PAVEMENT CAN 1407 EETEN3 RITA -11E 1-A CUCH LME. TABLE FE FLDME UNE TO 25 OR AS 1,1CH AS POSSIELE MIRE 43-501,16 1-1 FOU_OWINC CR: 1:011, 4,310 4.4404 R1.4.4. CFA r3All 5-1941-1001.40 AUA FETROFEE1 FOLLOR TILL OVERI.27 CRITERIA .480.40 145HEVER 4.PAWERElf, CARPI": IS DOI: WITH BI-IIMINCJ1 FATCHN: 311 H100.111,0.0 ROADILT15 FILL -CPTH 04.171 IF 1.011 Ur, 3MT 31411111341 19.15.5.-11 0P1 11F IHE 1113.11 1. RAH 51. urrAFAL HD 44 14,3_ 11nm 1 '130110 I/S9 01E1 VIRE-E 3=111F IED I1N ENE FLAIL FOR LSE 11 FLAW RAMP BE-ROF111 GUTTEF FEINFORGEMENT 11 0T MAI 5.1.]9E :AP EI 111A1, n: SHALL EEE ,DRE/ED PL/CED R 41E- r RI AN INDEPENDENT talPIETE POJR, 1011(9 010E6111, RE/NrCRCENENT DETA:LS Ow THIS SHEET 50. ALL SEPARATELY Kan 11,111/AL DRELL 440 :,•-•5449 Ho, 1.2. 1.0610 REINFORCEMENT OARS AT 1E. me 41L,um 5041114 PERIFORCSTIENT REWIRED FOR ALL 101•455461211C4 .1011,11 PITH711 sncan, 1 -ES OPTIONAL CLFEB LITE 1107.FORCEPTENT LETAEL S-OULO CULT BE It) 1, DC PAU/RUED JOINT r:LLEE MATERIAL PER WOOD SPEC. 37.32. Or STANDAR.D FLAN civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-615-0060 Pir y 11, AL LU 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 CIVIL DETAILS C5.2 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. r t 857 ,3 0513 JI•IP11 7 3190 546.' ASH SMA22-2STEMS, /346 / WETLA •:� 859.9• SF 4144 IhiOviog 5 -AP 1 \I 3188 551.7 WI17 3193 546.8 319438 546.8 SMA15 3189 546.8 BAP 3187 553.1 BE73182 2 -AL 3179 552.3 CRABS 3172' 544.7 P09 EED TYPE 2 5 -WP -2, 3186 553. AS H1 3f8 553 OK11 3184 53.1 08 08 54"6 - 3209 P❑8 N546.3 3210 546.3 P08 621 +++4++A+ ++ + -+ + + + + + + + 878 LAWN 3163 • 51.0 06 3207 546.7 ❑8 3;'C' 5 • 548.6 P010 318 548.6 P010 \\I t, 3169 544.7 P❑9 3178 552.3 CRA 3173 544,7 P09 -3STEMS 3176 542.2 3177 CH7 542.2 PE k ❑9 315• 557,7 5417.---"-- 716- --4207 46.716_-,P07 • 32 CRAB8 41/4 3134;�- .�2•,r BES oof-cNit wt 4:tmiler Noitr 1`41? 3140550 3141 P❑87 544.4 P❑6 3142 547.' P09 T 6`3� \I \ •• J7 61 143 4 ❑8 31,r 541. P06 3150 541.4 Pn7 879 5-A 3145 31 72- 0 554.8 - 14?06 ♦ 1.4 550.9 3151'- P❑8 552.2 P06 314 554.7 06 878 ' 2 -AL �--1 1 3 - CSP 1 I I i 8�5 5 FOUND 1/2" Li 0 3 -WP 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP 4-NWM 879 ANT .axdpio ,, i■■■■■■■' 'ar - ice. %I-= A■VT■■■■•Pi■.' I■■!'•"111■u .r. ,1■r. .1 .v - 1. IIIMIIM NU .. ..■I' 7■E�■■■■■■■■■I' '111 1■\. `. "1■ .■■►�1■■rd■►■ \.■ ■■■■■■■■■■.'l- ... 9 SSD m■■■■■■■■■■■■Ina.- Am.% ■■■■au■r■r - C■■■■■■■■■' :: 12 KFG ■■■■■■■■■■i■■■M ■■■■■I■■■■■/ •• '71 ••M.•MM••rUrd • • WETLAND 57,074.67 Si 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP. a. m PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITE SYM QUANT. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS DECIDUOUS TREES NWM 10 NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Northwood' 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM BB 5 Blue Beech Carpinus caroliniana 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM SHL 6 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST SWO 9 SWAMP WHITE OAK Gleditsia triacanthos'Skycole' Quercus bicolor 2.5" CAL. B&B 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM GSL 8 GREENSPIRE LINDEN 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM HB 3 HACKBERRY 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM RB 11 RIVER BIRCH Betula nigra 2.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ORNAMENTAL TREES PFC 7 PRAIRIEFIRE FLOWERING CRAB Malus'Prairiefire' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ABS SSC RBC 3 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 2 SPRING SNOW FLOWERING CRAB 8 RED BARON FLOWERING CRAB Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)' Malus'Spring Snow' Malus'Red Baron' 1.5" CAL. 1.5" CAL. 1.5" CAL. B&B B&B B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM ISL 3 IVORY SILK LILAC TREE Crataegus crus-galli 'Inermis' 1.5" CAL. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM EVERGREEN TREES %%BHS 22 C3fc, 15 WP %%.. 29 AP BLACK HILLS SPRUCE COLORADO SPRUCE WHITE PINE AUSTRIAN PINE Picea glauca 'Densata' Picea pungens Pinus strobus Pinua nigra 6' ht. 6' ht. 6' ht. 6' ht. B&B B&B B&B B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORM STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FROM AL 17 Nmerican Larch Larix laricina 6' ht. B&B STRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FROM LLH AMC AFD LQFH NCB SHRUBS - QNIFEROUS & EVERGREEN 12 LITTLE LIME HYDIFCCIGEA AUTUMN MAGIC CHOKKBERRY 59 26 30 33 Hydrangea paniculata'Little Lime' 36" HT. CONT. Aronia melanocarpa 'Autumn Magic' 24" HT. CONT. ARCTIC FIRE DOGWOOD Cornus sericea'Farrow' 24" HT. CONT. LITTLE QUICK FIRE HYDRANQEA Hydrangea paniculata'SMHPLQF' 24" HT. CONT. NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOID Buxus'Wilson' 24" HT. CONT. PERENNIALS & GRASSES KFG 65 Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grags Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' #1 CONT. AJS 14 AUTUMN JOY SEDUM Sedum 'Autumn Joy' #1 CONT. PMD 100 PARDON ME DAYLILLY Hemerocallis 'Pardon Me' #1 CONT. BMH 12 BLUEBERRY MUFFIN HOSTA 1 38 GOLDSTURM RUDBECKIA BES YWA Hosta 'Blueberry Muffin' #1 CONT. Rudbeckia fulgida'Goldsturm' #1 CONT. 11 YOUNIQUE WHITE ASTILBE Astilbe'Verswhite' #1 CONT. CS 57 CARADONNA SALVIA Salvia x sylvestris 'Caradonna' #1 CONT. 3043 3u SSD 3044 859.5 859.( 859.9 WI12 MA11 WI13 112 STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY - 60 Hemerocallis'Stella Supreme' #1 CONT. WI12 • • r-o■r r1•1r�orMa nl■■ •a.n•sot •1■■■■I•nu ■••■■•1AVIV i iWir,s i60J Ill1,l1k�4MMEMMierifik�r4447 iirw �� 3048 859,7 859.2 3053II19, CW29 859,2 3049 WI 859.1 / 3062 3057 860.1 CW243 8 052 WN79 E61 I NA12 W22306j 661,1 0.1 �CW24 8W24 21 860.46 3033 3025 W23035 861.0 861.8 3 _ ©/ CW22 861,0 CW25EL8 3063 861.4 EL6 3019 862.1 TP 160 51,1 N7306. 861. WN1 INIIMMEMENEL �At/ ;(ia■i. n■■■r41/ 1MENIMeo _ -- y d■■■ri■■■■■1 11■, .na...�■■■■■i!1 fit V11i!===== - _11,���� MMMMM MM MM `; FIRE ACCESS LANE, 20' OVERALL WIDTH. ALL GRASS IN FIRE ACCESS LANE MUST BE GRASSPAVE, SEE ARCH " tRON 8g FOUND 1 /2 133.00 1 g-�755E `/ • MMMM rOi-410WIEW.. OF • 4000 ,...,711.1111M111111111 AMIIMENE .111. .0111111111W -nisi: << viiiaANNUM ■�3 �� +; �� a■■■■■■■c 1pI■■■I Raimilr- 1 I■ .: ■■■111111■■m�IU//4i, 233,4 18" DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANC STRIP, TYP. _- + + + + + + +__ _n�++ +4-F\A/P+ + +-+++- 3021 862.4 EL 8 3026 860.9 861.4 WN13 4 -WP 60 5 .9 • Ill - U f INCOrn o co I o N891 9'36"E nU OC minimm MNIME■■■■■i1■■■■■■■1 4.are. r 157.00 • Ayala- 1.1LAP. mi-aloommommolitlitulimerst'Nur'44,4 .1:011 91 Os rit 16 - C+ -MP wail: .7 71, lorfty -AIV 6 CS 30210 862.1 WN7 • CZ 0 ao 03 op PMD =LOW- 37E.43 NV =858.63 815 co 100.00 CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EXISTING BUILDING BTI 6 )81(21 '3 1- c311 X 8 71 869 870 LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER. OWNERS REP SHALL APPROVE MULCH SAMPLE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EDGING SHALL BE METAL EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURING OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 4. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 6. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 9. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ACTIVITIES. 10. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ACTIVITIES. LEGEND lip.GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 34-262 WET PRAIRIE, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) 1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED SOD PROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES DECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA. • WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 PF 11, TA, 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 ce 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 18"- VERIFY W/PLAN SLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1 VERIFY WI GRADING PLAN FINISHED GRADE � .,iiS.S.i.S.SPI ate. III III II Lld FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTURE MIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION STAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT WATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED SUBGRADE AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIP N TS i' iff IIIIIIIIIII I �-I � I -I � I-III-III-III—I I I THREE TIMES WIDTH PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBER HOSE COLLARS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON -BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING N TS THREE TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES) PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL -TO -ROOT CONTACT EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING N TS \i /41 Ph IIIIII IIG hilwr_.11112 III -III i i SIZE VARIES SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEM ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TO ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL -TO -ROOT CONTACT EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATION DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL. MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT PERENNIAL BED PLANTING N TS IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWER CONNECTIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4. SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PER NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND METERING FACILITIES. 6. IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1%" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE. 7. ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 8. ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 9. ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. 12. FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADE PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. 13. BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. 14. ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. 15. GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 16. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 17. CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USE MOISTURE -PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO EACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODE ALL WIRES. 18. AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. 19. ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE. 20. USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS. 21. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. 22. ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. 23. ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATH VALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. 24. THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. LEGEND 1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED SOD PROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES DECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL 1" = 20'-0" 10'-0" 0 20'-0" VT O M Civil Engineering = Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Pr it aa tails© urchrte 1- 0 w 0 0 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 N H U W H 2 U ce z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Patrick J. Sarver DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS L1 .1 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. iyij Site Storm Water Management Report Project: Stillwater Senior Residential Development 114 Brick St. Stillwater, MN 55082 Developer: Ecumen 3530 Lexington Avenue North Shoreview, MN 55126 All plans and supporting Documentation contained in this report have been reviewed and approved by the Registered Engineer listed below and it is hereby certified that the plans comply with the requirements of the ordinance. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. /164. Matthew R. Pavek P.E. Registration Number: 44263 Date: 09/15/2017 www.CivilSiteGroup.com 4931 West 35th Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota • 55416 (612) 615-0060 Table of Contents: Cover Sheet Summary Narrative Stormwater Calculations Drainage Area Maps Existing Drainage Area Map Proposed Drainage Area Map HydroCAD Calculations Existing HydroCAD Calculations Proposed HydroCAD Calculations ciyiltSuitp Summary Narrative: This Storm Water Management Report accompanies the Civil Plans prepared for the Ecumen Stillwater Senior Living project dated 09/15/2017 and attached to this report. Existing Site Conditions: The existing site for this project is an existing vacant site. This project will be a construction of a new senior living building on a vacant area and an add on to the existing parking lot associated with the existing church building located to the south of the site. The disturbed area for this project is approximately 6.7 acres. The existing amount of impervious surface area within the disturbed limits is 0.8 acres. Soils: Soil borings have been completed by Professional Service Industries, Inc. (Intertek-PSI) dated March 3, 2017 with an Addendum added May 11, 2017. Soils on site typically consist of fill soils over clayey sands. The soils at the surface have been classified to have a Hydrologic Soil Group "C" designation. The soils in the vicinity of the infiltration basin have been classified to have a Hydrologic Soil Group "C" designation which is not conducive to infiltration. Filtration is proposed as an alternate to infiltration for the project. Groundwater: Groundwater has been identified in the soil borings ranging from an elevation of 853 to 878. Proposed Site: This project will be a construction of a new senior living building on a vacant area and an add on to the existing parking lot associated with the existing church building located to the south of the site. The existing parking lot in the location of the new building will be removed to facilitate the construction of the building addition. An additional parking lot will be constructed for the new building addition. The proposed amount of impervious surface area within the disturbed limits is 2.7 acres. ciyiltSuitp Requirements: Per City of Stillwater Since this project disturbs more than one acre, a Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization will be required. The City of Stillwater defers to the requirements of the watershed district when they are involved. Requirements: Per Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization Rate Control (MSCWMO): Runoff rate may not exceed existing conditions for the 2-, 10- and 100 -YR 24-hour storms with respective to 2.8, 4.2 and 7.3 -inch rainfall depths. Utilize Atlas -14 rainfall data. Volume Reduction (MSCWMO): For new, nonlinear developments that create new impervious surfaces on sites without restrictions, stormwater runoff volumes will be controlled and the post -construction runoff volume shall be retained on site for 1.1 inches of runoff from impervious surfaces. Water Quality (MSCWMO): Stormwater BMPs shall remove at least 0.55 inches of runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces and remove 75% of the annual total phosphorus load leaving all points on site. Proposed Storm Water Facilities: The project is proposing to utilize 2 above ground filtration basins to meet the requirements of the City of Stillwater and MSCWMO. The filtration basins have been designed to meet rate and volume requirements for the site. Rate Control practices proposed: Rate control for the project is provided by the proposed infiltration basin. The runoff rates for the 2 -YR, 10 -YR and 100 -YR rainfall events will be less than the existing rates (utilizing Atlas -14). See the table below for the existing and proposed runoff rates for this project. Rate Control Summary Table: Stormwater Rate Summary Drainage Area Existing Rate (cfs) 2 -YR [2.801 10 -YR [4.21 100 -YR [7.301 EX1 A 0.42 1.80 6.08 EX1 B 2.13 5.09 12.75 EX2A 0.46 1.79 5.83 EX2B 0.47 2.25 7.89 EX2C 0.42 1.80 6.09 EX3A 1.01 4.80 16.85 TOTAL 4.84 17.51 55.47 Drainage Area Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) 2 -YR [2.801 10 -YR [4.2"] 100 -YR [7.30"] IP (PRI) 0.47 7.96 16.26 2P (PR2) 0.10 0.40 6.92 PR3 1.46 6.96 24.44 PR4 0.15 0.25 0.49 TOTAL 1.77 14.00 43.78 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) 2 -Year Event 4.84 1.77 10 -Year Event 17.51 14.00 100 -Year Event 55.47 43.78 Volume/Water Quality Control Summary: Water volume and water quality control requirements are met by providing filtration onsite in the amount equal to 1.1 inches of runoff from the new or reconstructed impervious surfaces. The proposed filtration basins will be utilized to meet these requirements. Due to existing soil conditions, it is not feasible to provide for the abstraction of 0.55" of runoff over the new impervious surfaces. Filtration of the 1.1" event is proposed in lieu of infiltrating stormwater runoff. The calculations are shown below: Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary Drainage Area Required Infiltration Vol. Summary New Impv. Area (sf) Required Volume (cf) PR1 74833 6860 PR2 39585 3629 PR3 2542 233 PR4 1879 172 TOTAL 118839 10894 Storm Water Quality Control Provided: Proposed BMP Area Provided Vol (cf) Filtration Basin 1 6417 Filtration Basin 2 8107 TOTAL 14524 14524 CF > 10894 CF REQUIREMENT SATISFIED Infiltration Volume = 1.1"*Dist. Impv. Area Conclusions: This project is proposing to utilize two aboveground filtration basins to meet the requirements of the City of Stillwater and the MSCWMO. The aboveground filtration basins will be designed to provide rate control to match existing discharge rates from the site and the required volume reduction and water quality control. ECUMEN STILLWATER SENIOR Civil Site Group - Stormwater Calculations Existing Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value EX1A 2162 98 54850 61 57012 62 EX1B 28760 98 57626 61 86386 73 EX2A 2468 98 50300 61 52768 63 EX2B 291 98 76331 61 76622 61 EX2C 1944 98 55120 61 57064 62 EX3A 459 98 163252 61 163711 61 Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Impervious Area Pervious Area Total Area Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value Area [SF] CN Value PR1 74833 98 81109 61 155942 79 PR2 39585 98 58028 61 97613 76 PR3 2542 98 234936 61 237478 61 PR4 1879 98 651 61 2530 88 Site Area Summary Stormwater Rate Summary Drainage Area Impervious [SF] Impervious [AC] Pervious [SF] Pervious [AC] Total [SF] Total [AC] Existing Site 36084 0.83 457479 10.50 493563 11.33 Proposed Site 118839 2.73 374724 8.60 493563 11.33 Stormwater Rate Summary Drainage Area Existing Rate (cfs) 2 -YR [2.80"] 10 -YR [4.21 100 -YR [7.30"] EX1A 0.42 1.80 6.08 EX1B 2.13 5.09 12.75 EX2A 0.46 1.79 5.83 EX2B 0.47 2.25 7.89 EX2C 0.42 1.80 6.09 EX3A 1.01 4.80 16.85 TOTAL 4.84 17.51 55.47 Drainage Area Proposed Conditions Rate cfs) 2 -YR [2.801 10 -YR [4.21 100 -YR [7.30"] 1P (PR1) 0.47 7.96 16.26 2P (PR2) 0.10 0.40 6.92 PR3 1.46 6.96 24.44 PR4 0.15 0.25 0.49 TOTAL 1.77 14.00 43.78 Overall Stormwater Rate Summary Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary Drainage Area Existing Conditions Rate (cfs) Proposed Conditions Rate (cfs) 2 -Year Event 4.84 1.77 10 -Year Event 17.51 14.00 100 -Year Event 55.47 43.78 Stormwater Water Quality and Volume Summary Drainage Area Required Infiltration Vol. Summary New Impv. Area (sf) Required Volume (cf) PR1 74833 6860 PR2 39585 3629 PR3 2542 233 PR4 1879 172 TOTAL 118839 10894 Proposed BMP Area Provided Vol (cf) Filtration Basin 1 6417 Filtration Basin 2 8107 TOTAL 14524 Infiltration Volume = 1.1 "`Dist. Impv. Area OUTLOT A 5 4 3 to. 5 oto 655.2 556 6 9EMN1 2.586 10 0,5 \ 592,4 N.\0 — \\ \ \ \ pSvI.M5y x�ee7.°�\ \ EXISTING PDND/ l\ \ NWL=856.2 / ! \\ \x952.5 \ 6574 HWL-860.5 /-- --pe,a y j1 tr 1 2 ,C 4 e6ee 91, L 59'24 634.5 5531 5549 I�II !66544 45 554.6 / n1 ;t•1 / / 'Ai / /j// 4se�1:1.2___ EX1A` EX IMPV = 2162 SF EX PERV = 54850 SF TOTAL = 57012 SF sJM /1 5 2 EX2A �2 EX IMPV = 2468 SF EX PERV = 50300 SF TOTAL = 52768 SF (55,1 EX2B EX IMPV = 291 SF EX PERV = 76331 SF TOTAL = 76622 SF grit, \ ,yy� ▪ \ \ \ \ \ / I kam.* xea2A ---'2114 e:., /) '11--:-17:761------ \ \\ \\ \ \ \I, \\ \\ '\\A' -\\-j\:\--'\:\:1\\:\\\\:\\\\11\11‘\\\\\\1. . ~. \\ :4,... .-.� 3+d"30.57\\\,:\::::\,::::\ W 14 343 \ V ?k4 5 5\ \ \ \\ ) \ \� \\ \\ ti I\11 \ J� \ V 1 A) 1 i1 5 � Aufi 31 .s • • 0 f\ 7552 wo x08 \ N. \ \ / I \ \\ \,02, // // I \ \ tl°A/ / I v vv vy/ / I v.1 — 9 \ \ \` x5^/ / I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 5055 859.9 J� \NSd\ '�f 9 9.5 �Mr 8559 T F 2.1 INV- 2 /519.5 5695 OC. 589804-' B-- 2NOTES) T]AJ EX3A 2� EX IMPV = 459 SF QNG. EX PERV = 163252 SF TOTALA '163711 SF ��AA \o \k""\4 \\ \ \ 5 \-- -5805x650. FNNO , /2' IRON _ .1°40 +(e1-01 w ISO 416 2t 510 Ott ert•raa Alk FOUND RW 101 61911. ----FOUND EX1B EX IMPV = 28760 SF EX PERV = 57626 TOTAL = 86386 _ r \ +_5 `-- ar _010 5 \ \ ..,, \, \ \ 1 1 1 _ \\ x p4A I I II Il- 1 1 / I 1 _ -\ I II BLlDG x6t4� -l4 Q,p \ ` x5836 \ ri / - ep\ \ \\ \ V 1 \ \-- \ \—.. ___ INV 5 \ \ \ t° \\5 ae \\1.(1.4-1 �`--,.t. \ _ 4.60 -� I 5' 5115 61/ -Or,.,-,r. 555 5 151,851.36 ....11513,849.36 �.n '12°5'912 12 O,1, p5,s 5545 557}1 ) s(\10;! 4 I— . RAMSEY ST_ d54'--PoN-86445 5I INV..655.45 /2p So. line of N1/2 of 5E1/4- 1 ECUMEN - STILLWATER, MN 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP Project Number: Issue Date: 17055 Revision Number: Revision Date: L 4w° Top �,4 5 MO 2 coca at11 N19 —���1aee.19 OUTLOT A 4 mama— /lb .00 - 61 BASIN T/87RM0BAN 869.00 OF 675.00 e]I 00 �Pg3 MPV = 2542 SF -. PE .,=_234936 SF TO TPtE `237 SF 74:5;:s4/0,9),fly) DT y l y2+/ 961.A 032.6' 10,045, (414INV-t1 960.5 con. N1 -a5 N-e01.Je .�.I INV. -6149.3e 076.66 9�r Y 3 ansic ees.e I ANION T 8ERM 8 0 64.00 862.00 8671.00 _ -_ 161.60 a ° 34 eeA.5 NATOI bM ... _� PRIM P -V = 1879 SF V........... PR PERV = 651 Int 1-15JSS F OGo u0O\vggO 498 ;8° 30j8 g.07'i r eTea l0 17 LLATplri tiVriLNATp1 x\]s'61A♦ .� 3 ti. ., 4 �- I—� RA 904, b°r INV. -855.45 MATQI..., X30 1 YAlQ7" I0.} 1 So. lino of 81/2 of 5E1/4% 1" =100'-0" 50'-0" 0 1001-0" ECUMEN - STILLWATER, MN iyijSite 4931 W. 35TH ST., #200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 952.250.2003 / 763.213.394 www.CivilSiteGroup.com PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP Project Number: 17055 Issue Date: Revision Number: Revision Date: DA2 PR1 PROPOSED DA 1 p R2: PROPOSED DA 2 PR3 2P FILTRATION BASIN 1 FILTRATION BASIN PROPOSED DA 3 K/Subcat;, Reach PROPOSED DA 4 1R TOTAL Link Routing Diagram for 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER_PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 8.602 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4) 2.728 98 Paved parking, HSG B (PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4) 11.331 70 TOTAL AREA ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 11.331 HSG B PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 11.331 TOTAL AREA ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 8.602 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.602 >75% Grass cover, Good PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4 0.000 2.728 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.728 Paved parking PR1, PR2, PR3, PR4 0.000 11.331 0.000 0.000 0.000 11.331 TOTAL AREA ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In -Invert Out -Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Inside -Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 1P 861.50 859.20 124.0 0.0185 0.013 15.0 0.0 0.0 2 2P 868.50 857.70 85.0 0.1271 0.013 12.0 0.0 0.0 ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 Runoff Area=155,942 sf 47.99% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.04" Tc=10.0 min CN=79 Runoff=5.71 cfs 0.311 af Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 Runoff Area=97,613 sf 40.55% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.88" Tc=10.0 min CN=76 Runoff=2.97 cfs 0.164 of Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 Runoff Area=237,478 sf 1.07% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.29" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=1.46 cfs 0.132 of Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 Runoff Area=2,530 sf 74.27% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.64" Tc=10.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.15 cfs 0.008 af Reach 1 R: TOTAL Inflow=1.77 cfs 0.405 af Outflow=1.77 cfs 0.405 af Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Peak Elev=865.56' Storage=6,730 cf Inflow=5.71 cfs 0.311 af Outflow=0.47 cfs 0.165 af Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Peak Elev=871.77' Storage=3,901 cf Inflow=2.97 cfs 0.164 af Outflow=0.10 cfs 0.101 af Total Runoff Area = 11.331 ac Runoff Volume = 0.615 af Average Runoff Depth = 0.65" 75.92% Pervious = 8.602 ac 24.08% Impervious = 2.728 ac ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 = 5.71 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.311 af, Depth> 1.04" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 74,833 98 Paved parking, HSG B 81,109 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 155,942 79 Weighted Average 81,109 52.01% Pervious Area 74,833 47.99% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 5Y 5Y 4y Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 Hydrograph 5.71 cfs l�y�e 'll 14-hrs lid �-l�R Rainfall=1.80 Ruhoff Arear155942 Sf Runoff Volume=0.311' af u�noff00min Depti>1.Q4" t =1 c _aN- 79 7 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 = 2.97 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af, Depth> 0.88" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 39,585 98 Paved parking, HSG B 58,028 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 97,613 76 Weighted Average 58,028 59.45% Pervious Area 39,585 40.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 Hydrograph z 3y 2 lyii.)e 11 24-'hrJ 2.97 cfs 2�41R Rainfall1=.80" Runoff Area 97,613 sf / Fueoff Volum=9.164af u�off Deipti>0./8" c=10.0 min GAN=76 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 = 1.46 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.132 af, Depth> 0.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 2,542 98 Paved parking, HSG B 234,936 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 237,478 61 Weighted Average 234,936 98.93% Pervious Area 2,542 1.07% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 1- Subcatchment 1- Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 Hydrograph 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff 1.46 cfs lyii.)e II 244hrs -Y1f1R Rainfali=1.60'I 1 Runoff Area 237Ar78 Sf l ulioff Volum=9.1X32' af u.1off Deipti>0.29"1 c=10.0 min 61s1'=611 1 l I 1 10,,,E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 = 0.15 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af, Depth> 1.64" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 1,879 98 Paved parking, HSG B 651 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2,530 88 Weighted Average 651 25.73% Pervious Area 1,879 74.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13/ 0.12/ 0.11V 0.1 y 0.09/ 0.08/ LL 0.07,_ 0.06/ a 88 0.05/ 0.04/ 0.03/ 0.02 0.01 Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 Hydrograph �y�ie�i14�hr� _I .-V_Ri fa4= .8e 'Runof Area2,530 sf Flu ioff ygiuln!=0.00 0.15 cfs c=10.PPt11>I'4" 0 min 0 IT IT 7 TI 1 T 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Reach 1 R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 11.331 ac, 24.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.43" for 2 -YR event Inflow = 1.77 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.405 af Outflow = 1.77 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.405 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs U 0 I 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Reach 1 R: TOTAL Hydrograph I [177rf Inflow Area=11.3 .1.77 cfs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Inflow 0 Outflow ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Summary for Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 3.580 ac, 47.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.04" for 2 -YR event 5.71 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.311 af 0.47 cfs @ 12.84 hrs, Volume= 0.165 af, Atten= 92%, Lag= 49.3 min 0.47 cfs © 12.84 hrs, Volume= 0.165 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 865.56' @ 12.84 hrs Surf.Area= 4,902 sf Storage= 6,730 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 258.1 min calculated for 0.165 af (53% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 129.0 min ( 980.8 - 851.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 Elevation (feet) 864.00 865.00 866.00 867.00 868.00 864.00' 21,161 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Surf.Area (sq -ft) 3,724 4,456 5,246 6,095 7,003 Device Routing Invert Inc.Store (cubic -feet) 0 4,090 4,851 5,671 6,549 Outlet Devices Cum.Store (cubic -feet) 0 4,090 8,941 14,612 21,161 #1 Primary 861.50' #2 Device 1 #3 Device 1 #4 Device 3 #5 Primary 865.50' 861.50' 864.00' 867.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 124.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 861.50' / 859.20' S= 0.0185 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 1.23 sf 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 8.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 Primary OutFlow Max=0.47 cfs @ 12.84 hrs HW=865.56' (Free Discharge) - 1=Culvert (Passes 0.47 cfs of 9.67 cfs potential flow) AL2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.38 cfs @ 0.83 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.09 cfs of 1.85 cfs potential flow) 4-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.09 cfs) - 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 6:/ Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Hydrograph 5.71 cfs Ilnlo�nr�A%ea�3.5�0' as ipaI th v=865.56' $tbra e61,7 -(i c- 0.47• cfs 868 867- d w 0 866 m w 865- 864 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Stage -Area -Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq -ft) 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 �... ...1... 0 Custom Stage Data / 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 Storage (cubic -feet) 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 Inflow ❑ Primary Surface 0 Storage ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Stage -Discharge for Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 864.00 0.00 865.04 0.08 866.08 10.31 867.12 12.46 864.02 0.07 865.06 0.08 866.10 10.39 867.14 12.69 864.04 0.07 865.08 0.08 866.12 10.42 867.16 12.94 864.06 0.07 865.10 0.08 866.14 10.45 867.18 13.21 864.08 0.07 865.12 0.08 866.16 10.47 867.20 13.48 864.10 0.07 865.14 0.08 866.18 10.50 867.22 13.78 864.12 0.07 865.16 0.08 866.20 10.52 867.24 14.10 864.14 0.07 865.18 0.09 866.22 10.55 867.26 14.43 864.16 0.07 865.20 0.09 866.24 10.58 867.28 14.77 864.18 0.07 865.22 0.09 866.26 10.60 867.30 15.13 864.20 0.07 865.24 0.09 866.28 10.63 867.32 15.50 864.22 0.07 865.26 0.09 866.30 10.65 867.34 15.88 864.24 0.07 865.28 0.09 866.32 10.68 867.36 16.28 864.26 0.07 865.30 0.09 866.34 10.70 867.38 16.69 864.28 0.07 865.32 0.09 866.36 10.73 867.40 17.12 864.30 0.07 865.34 0.09 866.38 10.75 867.42 17.56 864.32 0.07 865.36 0.09 866.40 10.78 867.44 18.03 864.34 0.07 865.38 0.09 866.42 10.81 867.46 18.50 864.36 0.07 865.40 0.09 866.44 10.83 867.48 18.99 864.38 0.07 865.42 0.09 866.46 10.86 867.50 19.50 864.40 0.07 865.44 0.09 866.48 10.88 867.52 20.02 864.42 0.07 865.46 0.09 866.50 10.91 867.54 20.55 864.44 0.07 865.48 0.09 866.52 10.93 867.56 21.10 864.46 0.08 865.50 0.09 866.54 10.95 867.58 21.66 864.48 0.08 865.52 0.16 866.56 10.98 867.60 22.24 864.50 0.08 865.54 0.28 866.58 11.00 867.62 22.76 864.52 0.08 865.56 0.43 866.60 11.03 867.64 23.29 864.54 0.08 865.58 0.61 866.62 11.05 867.66 23.83 864.56 0.08 865.60 0.82 866.64 11.08 867.68 24.38 864.58 0.08 865.62 1.05 866.66 11.10 867.70 24.94 864.60 0.08 865.64 1.30 866.68 11.13 867.72 25.50 864.62 0.08 865.66 1.57 866.70 11.15 867.74 26.07 864.64 0.08 865.68 1.86 866.72 11.18 867.76 26.65 864.66 0.08 865.70 2.16 866.74 11.20 867.78 27.23 864.68 0.08 865.72 2.48 866.76 11.22 867.80 27.82 864.70 0.08 865.74 2.81 866.78 11.25 867.82 28.42 864.72 0.08 865.76 3.16 866.80 11.27 867.84 29.02 864.74 0.08 865.78 3.52 866.82 11.30 867.86 29.63 864.76 0.08 865.80 3.89 866.84 11.32 867.88 30.25 864.78 0.08 865.82 4.28 866.86 11.35 867.90 30.87 864.80 0.08 865.84 4.68 866.88 11.37 867.92 31.50 864.82 0.08 865.86 5.09 866.90 11.39 867.94 32.13 864.84 0.08 865.88 5.51 866.92 11.42 867.96 32.78 864.86 0.08 865.90 5.94 866.94 11.44 867.98 33.42 864.88 0.08 865.92 6.39 866.96 11.46 868.00 34.07 864.90 0.08 865.94 6.84 866.98 11.49 864.92 0.08 865.96 7.31 867.00 11.51 864.94 0.08 865.98 7.78 867.02 11.59 864.96 0.08 866.00 8.27 867.04 11.71 864.98 0.08 866.02 8.76 867.06 11.87 865.00 0.08 866.04 9.27 867.08 12.05 865.02 0.08 866.06 9.78 867.10 12.24 ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Summary for Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 2.241 ac, 40.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.88" for 2 -YR event 2.97 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af 0.10 cfs @ 15.63 hrs, Volume= 0.101 af, Atten= 97%, Lag= 216.1 0.10 cfs © 15.63 hrs, Volume= 0.101 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 871.77' @ 15.63 hrs Surf.Area= 5,412 sf Storage= 3,901 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 335.4 min calculated for 0.101 of (61`)/0 of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 208.6 min ( 1,070.8 - 862.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description min #1 Elevation (feet) 871.00 872.00 873.00 874.00 875.00 876.00 871.00' 35,083 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Surf.Area (sq -ft) 4,785 5,604 6,485 7,426 8,429 9,493 Device Routing Invert Inc.Store (cubic -feet) 0 5,195 6,045 6,956 7,928 8,961 Outlet Devices Cum.Store (cubic -feet) 0 5,195 11,239 18,195 26,122 35,083 #1 Primary 868.50' #2 Device 1 #3 Device 1 #4 Device 3 #5 Primary 872.50' 868.50' 871.00' 875.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 85.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 868.50' / 857.70' S= 0.1271 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 8.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 erimary OutFlow Max=0.10 cfs @ 15.63 hrs HW=871.77' (Free Discharge) - 1=Culvert (Passes 0.10 cfs of 5.55 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.10 cfs of 1.64 cfs potential flow) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.10 cfs) - 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 0 0 LT. Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Hydrograph Iln 2.97 cfs lo'w1Area2.2al1' a� Elv'=87i .7171 $tbr je3,9b1 cif • 0.10 cfs 876 875- w874/ 0 w 873 872- / 871 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Stage -Area -Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq -ft) 0 500 1,0001,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 A ...1......1..11... Custom Stage Data I1 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Storage (cubic -feet) 25,000 30,000 35,000 Inflow ❑ Primary Surface 0 Storage ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Stage -Discharge for Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 871.00 0.00 873.60 7.16 871.05 0.09 873.65 7.20 871.10 0.09 873.70 7.23 871.15 0.09 873.75 7.27 871.20 0.09 873.80 7.31 871.25 0.09 873.85 7.35 871.30 0.09 873.90 7.39 871.35 0.09 873.95 7.42 871.40 0.09 874.00 7.46 871.45 0.10 874.05 7.50 871.50 0.10 874.10 7.54 871.55 0.10 874.15 7.57 871.60 0.10 874.20 7.61 871.65 0.10 874.25 7.65 871.70 0.10 874.30 7.68 871.75 0.10 874.35 7.72 871.80 0.10 874.40 7.75 871.85 0.10 874.45 7.79 871.90 0.10 874.50 7.83 871.95 0.10 874.55 7.86 872.00 0.10 874.60 7.90 872.05 0.10 874.65 7.93 872.10 0.11 874.70 7.97 872.15 0.11 874.75 8.00 872.20 0.11 874.80 8.04 872.25 0.11 874.85 8.07 872.30 0.11 874.90 8.10 872.35 0.11 874.95 8.14 872.40 0.11 875.00 8.17 872.45 0.11 875.05 8.42 872.50 0.11 875.10 8.86 872.55 0.37 875.15 9.40 872.60 0.84 875.20 10.05 872.65 1.46 875.25 10.80 872.70 2.18 875.30 11.64 872.75 3.01 875.35 12.57 872.80 3.91 875.40 13.58 872.85 4.90 875.45 14.70 872.90 5.97 875.50 15.92 872.95 6.63 875.55 17.22 873.00 6.67 875.60 18.61 873.05 6.72 875.65 19.91 873.10 6.76 875.70 21.26 873.15 6.80 875.75 22.66 873.20 6.84 875.80 24.10 873.25 6.88 875.85 25.58 873.30 6.92 875.90 27.10 873.35 6.96 875.95 28.67 873.40 7.00 876.00 30.27 873.45 7.04 873.50 7.08 873.55 7.12 ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 Runoff Area=155,942 sf 47.99% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.12" Tc=10.0 min CN=79 Runoff=11.74 cfs 0.633 of Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 Runoff Area=97,613 sf 40.55% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.89" Tc=10.0 min CN=76 Runoff=6.54 cfs 0.353 af Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 Runoff Area=237,478 sf 1.07% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=6.96 cfs 0.415 af Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 Runoff Area=2,530 sf 74.27% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.014 af Reach 1R: TOTAL Inflow=14.00 cfs 1.087 af Outflow=14.00 cfs 1.087 af Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Peak Elev=865.99' Storage=8,874 cf Inflow=11.74 cfs 0.633 af Outflow=7.96 cfs 0.484 af Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Peak Elev=872.55' Storage=8,427 cf Inflow=6.54 cfs 0.353 af Outflow=0.40 cfs 0.174 af Total Runoff Area = 11.331 ac Runoff Volume = 1.414 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.50" 75.92% Pervious = 8.602 ac 24.08% Impervious = 2.728 ac ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 = 11.74 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.633 af, Depth> 2.12" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 74,833 98 Paved parking, HSG B 81,109 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 155,942 79 Weighted Average 81,109 52.01% Pervious Area 74,833 47.99% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 13- 12-./ 11 10 8 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 Hydrograph 11.74 cfs Tyje-EI 14 -hr 10=*(I4 Rainfal1=4.20" Runoff Area=155;942 sf Fuioff y/o!u!neF=9.6a af ;�1 . rmlin��i2� c 0 ak=7i 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 = 6.54 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.353 af, Depth> 1.89" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 39,585 98 58,028 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 97,613 76 58,028 39,585 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 59.45% Pervious Area 40.55% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 7- 6- 5- 2- 0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 Hydrograph L 1X�e 111 10 -YR Runoff Runoff ul10 Tc=10A1 GAN=76 6.54 cfs ii: h _ _ Rai%fall=4.2o" .2 Area 97,613 sf Volur,e=0.353 af ,, 7ept>1.9" fin- ,/ ij j 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 = 6.96 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.415 af, Depth> 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 2,542 98 234,936 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 237,478 61 234,936 2,542 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 98.93% Pervious Area 1.07% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 Hydrograph 7-/ Ry e i 4-h rT 4 6.96 cfs 10=IR Rai%faII x.26" Runoff Area _23/R8 sf Funoff VoluTE!=9.415 af tC uio0ff Delpt>0:91-" =1 . min GAN=61 A H 9 10 11 12 13 14 Time (hours) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 = 0.25 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.014 af, Depth> 2.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 1,879 98 Paved parking, HSG B 651 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2,530 88 Weighted Average 651 25.73% Pervious Area 1,879 74.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0.28 0.26i/ 0.242/ 0.22 0.27 0..18 Iii 0161/ 0_f yQ Iu]�_0.li4Faf 0.14 41;t !o# PPtIl>2?1 � ° 0=1 .0 m i rr LT0.12 : Qi 0.1 1 Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 Hydrograph t l� eii� h 16=iY1Fiat of ll4. 26" Rulhof Area2 530 sf fi 0.25 cfs 0.08-V 0.06/' 0.04 0.02 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Reach 1 R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 11.331 ac, 24.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.15" for 10 -YR event Inflow = 14.00 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1.087 af Outflow = 14.00 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1.087 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs IT) 0 LL Reach 1 R: TOTAL Hydrograph 5: f 4/ 3=� 2=' // 9= 8= 7- 6/ 54/ 4/ 3=7/ l - 2=/ 11annr•fJ �n#IO�nr e=.3„14.00 cfs I ,— — I —I -1- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Inflow 0 Outflow ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Summary for Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 3.580 ac, 47.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.12" for 10 -YR event 11.74 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.633 af 7.96 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.484 af, Atten= 32%, Lag= 5.0 min 7.96 cfs © 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.484 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 865.99' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 5,236 sf Storage= 8,874 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 136.7 min calculated for 0.484 af (76% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 45.3 min ( 876.6 - 831.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 Elevation (feet) 864.00 865.00 866.00 867.00 868.00 864.00' 21,161 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Surf.Area (sq -ft) 3,724 4,456 5,246 6,095 7,003 Device Routing Invert Inc.Store (cubic -feet) 0 4,090 4,851 5,671 6,549 Outlet Devices Cum.Store (cubic -feet) 0 4,090 8,941 14,612 21,161 #1 Primary 861.50' #2 Device 1 #3 Device 1 #4 Device 3 #5 Primary 865.50' 861.50' 864.00' 867.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 124.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 861.50' / 859.20' S= 0.0185 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 1.23 sf 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 8.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 Primary OutFlow Max=7.95 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=865.99' (Free Discharge) - 1=Culvert (Passes 7.95 cfs of 10.25 cfs potential flow) AL2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 7.85 cfs @ 2.28 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.10 cfs of 1.95 cfs potential flow) 4-4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.10 cfs) - 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Hydrograph 3/ 24 11/ 01/ 94 81/ 71/ 2 61/ / 54 ^- 34 4 4 11.74 cfs Indoor Area=3.5$-0'a-er- �e�al�l�ev�86�.�' $tbr e8 8' 4 4 - 47196 cfs L 4 A. 4 0 868- 867- d w 0 866 m w 865- 864 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 Storage (cubic -feet) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Stage -Area -Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq -ft) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 Custom Stage Data 16,000 18,000 20,000 Inflow ❑ Primary t Surface 0 Storage ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Stage -Discharge for Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 864.00 0.00 865.04 0.08 866.08 10.31 867.12 12.46 864.02 0.07 865.06 0.08 866.10 10.39 867.14 12.69 864.04 0.07 865.08 0.08 866.12 10.42 867.16 12.94 864.06 0.07 865.10 0.08 866.14 10.45 867.18 13.21 864.08 0.07 865.12 0.08 866.16 10.47 867.20 13.48 864.10 0.07 865.14 0.08 866.18 10.50 867.22 13.78 864.12 0.07 865.16 0.08 866.20 10.52 867.24 14.10 864.14 0.07 865.18 0.09 866.22 10.55 867.26 14.43 864.16 0.07 865.20 0.09 866.24 10.58 867.28 14.77 864.18 0.07 865.22 0.09 866.26 10.60 867.30 15.13 864.20 0.07 865.24 0.09 866.28 10.63 867.32 15.50 864.22 0.07 865.26 0.09 866.30 10.65 867.34 15.88 864.24 0.07 865.28 0.09 866.32 10.68 867.36 16.28 864.26 0.07 865.30 0.09 866.34 10.70 867.38 16.69 864.28 0.07 865.32 0.09 866.36 10.73 867.40 17.12 864.30 0.07 865.34 0.09 866.38 10.75 867.42 17.56 864.32 0.07 865.36 0.09 866.40 10.78 867.44 18.03 864.34 0.07 865.38 0.09 866.42 10.81 867.46 18.50 864.36 0.07 865.40 0.09 866.44 10.83 867.48 18.99 864.38 0.07 865.42 0.09 866.46 10.86 867.50 19.50 864.40 0.07 865.44 0.09 866.48 10.88 867.52 20.02 864.42 0.07 865.46 0.09 866.50 10.91 867.54 20.55 864.44 0.07 865.48 0.09 866.52 10.93 867.56 21.10 864.46 0.08 865.50 0.09 866.54 10.95 867.58 21.66 864.48 0.08 865.52 0.16 866.56 10.98 867.60 22.24 864.50 0.08 865.54 0.28 866.58 11.00 867.62 22.76 864.52 0.08 865.56 0.43 866.60 11.03 867.64 23.29 864.54 0.08 865.58 0.61 866.62 11.05 867.66 23.83 864.56 0.08 865.60 0.82 866.64 11.08 867.68 24.38 864.58 0.08 865.62 1.05 866.66 11.10 867.70 24.94 864.60 0.08 865.64 1.30 866.68 11.13 867.72 25.50 864.62 0.08 865.66 1.57 866.70 11.15 867.74 26.07 864.64 0.08 865.68 1.86 866.72 11.18 867.76 26.65 864.66 0.08 865.70 2.16 866.74 11.20 867.78 27.23 864.68 0.08 865.72 2.48 866.76 11.22 867.80 27.82 864.70 0.08 865.74 2.81 866.78 11.25 867.82 28.42 864.72 0.08 865.76 3.16 866.80 11.27 867.84 29.02 864.74 0.08 865.78 3.52 866.82 11.30 867.86 29.63 864.76 0.08 865.80 3.89 866.84 11.32 867.88 30.25 864.78 0.08 865.82 4.28 866.86 11.35 867.90 30.87 864.80 0.08 865.84 4.68 866.88 11.37 867.92 31.50 864.82 0.08 865.86 5.09 866.90 11.39 867.94 32.13 864.84 0.08 865.88 5.51 866.92 11.42 867.96 32.78 864.86 0.08 865.90 5.94 866.94 11.44 867.98 33.42 864.88 0.08 865.92 6.39 866.96 11.46 868.00 34.07 864.90 0.08 865.94 6.84 866.98 11.49 864.92 0.08 865.96 7.31 867.00 11.51 864.94 0.08 865.98 7.78 867.02 11.59 864.96 0.08 866.00 8.27 867.04 11.71 864.98 0.08 866.02 8.76 867.06 11.87 865.00 0.08 866.04 9.27 867.08 12.05 865.02 0.08 866.06 9.78 867.10 12.24 ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Summary for Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 2.241 ac, 40.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.89" for 10 -YR event 6.54 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.353 af 0.40 cfs @ 13.21 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af, Atten= 94%, Lag= 71.3 min 0.40 cfs © 13.21 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 872.55' @ 13.21 hrs Surf.Area= 6,091 sf Storage= 8,427 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 278.8 min calculated for 0.174 af (49% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 154.9 min ( 994.4 - 839.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 Elevation (feet) 871.00 872.00 873.00 874.00 875.00 876.00 871.00' 35,083 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Surf.Area (sq -ft) 4,785 5,604 6,485 7,426 8,429 9,493 Device Routing Invert Inc.Store (cubic -feet) 0 5,195 6,045 6,956 7,928 8,961 Outlet Devices Cum.Store (cubic -feet) 0 5,195 11,239 18,195 26,122 35,083 #1 Primary 868.50' #2 Device 1 #3 Device 1 #4 Device 3 #5 Primary 872.50' 868.50' 871.00' 875.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 85.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 868.50' / 857.70' S= 0.1271 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 8.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 erimary OutFlow Max=0.39 cfs @ 13.21 hrs HW=872.55' (Free Discharge) - 1=Culvert (Passes 0.39 cfs of 6.29 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.28 cfs © 0.75 fps) Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.11 cfs of 1.84 cfs potential flow) 4=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.11 cfs) - 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Hydrograph 7L/ 6-- 5 3/ 2L/ Inflow Aire 2.2-1' Pe�aI �Iev 872.55' $tbra6e8,4d 6.54 cfs J 0.40 cfs 7 f 876 875- 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Stage -Area -Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq -ft) 0 500 1,0001,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 -i 874- 8 0 °' 873 w 872- 871 0 A p Custom Stage Data 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Storage (cubic -feet) 25,000 30,000 35,000 Inflow ❑ Primary Surface 0 Storage ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Stage -Discharge for Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 871.00 0.00 873.60 7.16 871.05 0.09 873.65 7.20 871.10 0.09 873.70 7.23 871.15 0.09 873.75 7.27 871.20 0.09 873.80 7.31 871.25 0.09 873.85 7.35 871.30 0.09 873.90 7.39 871.35 0.09 873.95 7.42 871.40 0.09 874.00 7.46 871.45 0.10 874.05 7.50 871.50 0.10 874.10 7.54 871.55 0.10 874.15 7.57 871.60 0.10 874.20 7.61 871.65 0.10 874.25 7.65 871.70 0.10 874.30 7.68 871.75 0.10 874.35 7.72 871.80 0.10 874.40 7.75 871.85 0.10 874.45 7.79 871.90 0.10 874.50 7.83 871.95 0.10 874.55 7.86 872.00 0.10 874.60 7.90 872.05 0.10 874.65 7.93 872.10 0.11 874.70 7.97 872.15 0.11 874.75 8.00 872.20 0.11 874.80 8.04 872.25 0.11 874.85 8.07 872.30 0.11 874.90 8.10 872.35 0.11 874.95 8.14 872.40 0.11 875.00 8.17 872.45 0.11 875.05 8.42 872.50 0.11 875.10 8.86 872.55 0.37 875.15 9.40 872.60 0.84 875.20 10.05 872.65 1.46 875.25 10.80 872.70 2.18 875.30 11.64 872.75 3.01 875.35 12.57 872.80 3.91 875.40 13.58 872.85 4.90 875.45 14.70 872.90 5.97 875.50 15.92 872.95 6.63 875.55 17.22 873.00 6.67 875.60 18.61 873.05 6.72 875.65 19.91 873.10 6.76 875.70 21.26 873.15 6.80 875.75 22.66 873.20 6.84 875.80 24.10 873.25 6.88 875.85 25.58 873.30 6.92 875.90 27.10 873.35 6.96 875.95 28.67 873.40 7.00 876.00 30.27 873.45 7.04 873.50 7.08 873.55 7.12 ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 Runoff Area=155,942 sf 47.99% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.85" Tc=10.0 min CN=79 Runoff=26.25 cfs 1.446 af Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 Runoff Area=97,613 sf 40.55% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.51" Tc=10.0 min CN=76 Runoff=15.45 cfs 0.843 af Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 Runoff Area=237,478 sf 1.07% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=24.44 cfs 1.323 af Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 Runoff Area=2,530 sf 74.27% Impervious Runoff Depth>5.87" Tc=10.0 min CN=88 Runoff=0.49 cfs 0.028 af Reach 1R: TOTAL Inflow=43.78 cfs 3.302 af Outflow=43.78 cfs 3.302 af Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Peak Elev=867.36' Storage=16,858 cf Inflow=26.25 cfs 1.446 af Outflow=16.26 cfs 1.295 af Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Peak Elev=873.31' Storage=13,267 cf Inflow=15.45 cfs 0.843 af Outflow=6.92 cfs 0.655 af Total Runoff Area = 11.331 ac Runoff Volume = 3.641 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.86" 75.92% Pervious = 8.602 ac 24.08% Impervious = 2.728 ac ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 = 26.25 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 1.446 af, Depth> 4.85" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 74,833 98 Paved parking, HSG B 81,109 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 155,942 79 Weighted Average 81,109 52.01% Pervious Area 74,833 47.99% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR1: PROPOSED DA 1 Hydrograph 8- 26� l�e11 24 1101j-1 R tai i n a I I4 O" 26.25 cfs 187 Ruoff yoluLne 1.446 afj 3 2t1or 98113t11>f1-57 12-/ Tc=1 .0 nir- GN=7 107/ 8 1 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 = 15.45 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.843 af, Depth> 4.51" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 39,585 98 Paved parking, HSG B 58,028 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 97,613 76 Weighted Average 58,028 59.45% Pervious Area 39,585 40.55% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 1 1 1 1 1 4.6 1 0 LL Subcatchment PR2: PROPOSED DA 2 Hydrograph 15.45 cfs iyiJoe 11 110 -1 R �aiirfi aIi 0"! Ruoff Areai97 613 sf ;/ Ra off VoI u me=0.8431 of —Rro f Depti> 'C" Tc=1 .0 min 5 /I / 4 3 2 It 0I L 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 = 24.44 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1.323 af, Depth> 2.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 2,542 98 Paved parking, HSG B 234,936 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 237,478 61 Weighted Average 234,936 98.93% Pervious Area 2,542 1.07% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR3: PROPOSED DA 3 Hydrograph 26-' byre 1114 ih- 24.44 cfs 22_ 11Q6-1LR r3aiin�fall=x.30"' 2°1,u-4ioff Area=237478 sf 18= 16- /-u-Doff Volume=1.323 af 14-j "'1'0 ¶epth>V 12 C+0 Tc=1 min 10 ak=61 81' 4/ =/P rt T 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 = 0.49 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.028 af, Depth> 5.87" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 1,879 98 651 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2,530 88 Weighted Average 651 25.73% Pervious Area 1,879 74.27% Impervious Area Tc Length (min) (feet) Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 45 0.3 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment PR4: PROPOSED DA 4 Hydrograph 2 0.25 LL :/ 1- I7 iyaiel i41- h� 0.49 cfs 106-111R Ruiiof Area=2 530 sf Runoff volume=0.028a ul off 0��ept !>5.7" c =1 min c � CN=88 ' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Summary for Reach 1 R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 11.331 ac, 24.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.50" for 100 -YR event Inflow = 43.78 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 3.302 af Outflow = 43.78 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 3.302 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs 0 LL Reach 1 R: TOTAL Hydrograph 48;' 46_ 44= j I n oii A e 42_� 40- 38 j i 34_/ i 32_/ i 30_ 28= 262 % l 24= /- 22 - 22_ 20- 18 / 16= / 14 127: 10_ 6_% 4= 2= I I dl 7R rf 43.78 cfs H- 1 4 1 -- 7 if 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Inflow 0 Outflow ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Summary for Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 3.580 ac, 47.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.85" for 100 -YR event 26.25 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 1.446 af 16.26 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1.295 af, Atten= 38%, Lag= 5.7 min 16.26 cfs © 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1.295 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 867.36' @ 12.11 hrs Surf.Area= 6,421 sf Storage= 16,858 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 78.4 min calculated for 1.295 af (89% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 26.3 min ( 834.2 - 807.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 Elevation (feet) 864.00 865.00 866.00 867.00 868.00 864.00' 21,161 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Surf.Area (sq -ft) 3,724 4,456 5,246 6,095 7,003 Device Routing Invert Inc.Store (cubic -feet) 0 4,090 4,851 5,671 6,549 Outlet Devices Cum.Store (cubic -feet) 0 4,090 8,941 14,612 21,161 #1 Primary 861.50' #2 Device 1 #3 Device 1 #4 Device 3 #5 Primary 865.50' 861.50' 864.00' 867.00' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 124.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 861.50' / 859.20' S= 0.0185 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 1.23 sf 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 8.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 Primary OutFlow Max=16.25 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW=867.36' (Free Discharge) - 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 11.93 cfs @ 9.72 fps) AL2=Orifice/Grate (Passes < 26.10 cfs potential flow) 3=Orifice/Grate (Passes < 2.24 cfs potential flow) 4-4=Exfiltration (Passes < 0.12 cfs potential flow) - 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 4.32 cfs © 1.51 fps) ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37 0 LL Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Hydrograph 26.25 cfs z6 262 1nfloVrA�-e 24 �e�alle�v=86.8'6' 22/ 20 t#%rj 1t,$58Tcf 18/ 164 14/ 12/ 10� 8/ 6= / 4= 2 - H 1 16.26. cfs 10 ' 0 868- 867- d w 0 866 m w 865- 864 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Stage -Area -Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq -ft} 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 Custom Stage Data 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 Storage (cubic -feet) 16,000 18,000 20,000 Inflow ❑ Primary t Surface 0 Storage ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 38 Stage -Discharge for Pond 1P: FILTRATION BASIN 1 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 864.00 0.00 865.04 0.08 866.08 10.31 867.12 12.46 864.02 0.07 865.06 0.08 866.10 10.39 867.14 12.69 864.04 0.07 865.08 0.08 866.12 10.42 867.16 12.94 864.06 0.07 865.10 0.08 866.14 10.45 867.18 13.21 864.08 0.07 865.12 0.08 866.16 10.47 867.20 13.48 864.10 0.07 865.14 0.08 866.18 10.50 867.22 13.78 864.12 0.07 865.16 0.08 866.20 10.52 867.24 14.10 864.14 0.07 865.18 0.09 866.22 10.55 867.26 14.43 864.16 0.07 865.20 0.09 866.24 10.58 867.28 14.77 864.18 0.07 865.22 0.09 866.26 10.60 867.30 15.13 864.20 0.07 865.24 0.09 866.28 10.63 867.32 15.50 864.22 0.07 865.26 0.09 866.30 10.65 867.34 15.88 864.24 0.07 865.28 0.09 866.32 10.68 867.36 16.28 864.26 0.07 865.30 0.09 866.34 10.70 867.38 16.69 864.28 0.07 865.32 0.09 866.36 10.73 867.40 17.12 864.30 0.07 865.34 0.09 866.38 10.75 867.42 17.56 864.32 0.07 865.36 0.09 866.40 10.78 867.44 18.03 864.34 0.07 865.38 0.09 866.42 10.81 867.46 18.50 864.36 0.07 865.40 0.09 866.44 10.83 867.48 18.99 864.38 0.07 865.42 0.09 866.46 10.86 867.50 19.50 864.40 0.07 865.44 0.09 866.48 10.88 867.52 20.02 864.42 0.07 865.46 0.09 866.50 10.91 867.54 20.55 864.44 0.07 865.48 0.09 866.52 10.93 867.56 21.10 864.46 0.08 865.50 0.09 866.54 10.95 867.58 21.66 864.48 0.08 865.52 0.16 866.56 10.98 867.60 22.24 864.50 0.08 865.54 0.28 866.58 11.00 867.62 22.76 864.52 0.08 865.56 0.43 866.60 11.03 867.64 23.29 864.54 0.08 865.58 0.61 866.62 11.05 867.66 23.83 864.56 0.08 865.60 0.82 866.64 11.08 867.68 24.38 864.58 0.08 865.62 1.05 866.66 11.10 867.70 24.94 864.60 0.08 865.64 1.30 866.68 11.13 867.72 25.50 864.62 0.08 865.66 1.57 866.70 11.15 867.74 26.07 864.64 0.08 865.68 1.86 866.72 11.18 867.76 26.65 864.66 0.08 865.70 2.16 866.74 11.20 867.78 27.23 864.68 0.08 865.72 2.48 866.76 11.22 867.80 27.82 864.70 0.08 865.74 2.81 866.78 11.25 867.82 28.42 864.72 0.08 865.76 3.16 866.80 11.27 867.84 29.02 864.74 0.08 865.78 3.52 866.82 11.30 867.86 29.63 864.76 0.08 865.80 3.89 866.84 11.32 867.88 30.25 864.78 0.08 865.82 4.28 866.86 11.35 867.90 30.87 864.80 0.08 865.84 4.68 866.88 11.37 867.92 31.50 864.82 0.08 865.86 5.09 866.90 11.39 867.94 32.13 864.84 0.08 865.88 5.51 866.92 11.42 867.96 32.78 864.86 0.08 865.90 5.94 866.94 11.44 867.98 33.42 864.88 0.08 865.92 6.39 866.96 11.46 868.00 34.07 864.90 0.08 865.94 6.84 866.98 11.49 864.92 0.08 865.96 7.31 867.00 11.51 864.94 0.08 865.98 7.78 867.02 11.59 864.96 0.08 866.00 8.27 867.04 11.71 864.98 0.08 866.02 8.76 867.06 11.87 865.00 0.08 866.04 9.27 867.08 12.05 865.02 0.08 866.06 9.78 867.10 12.24 ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Summary for Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 2.241 ac, 40.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.51" for 100 -YR event 15.45 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.843 af 6.92 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.655 af, Atten= 55%, Lag= 7.8 min 6.92 cfs © 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.655 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 873.31' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 6,773 sf Storage= 13,267 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 129.9 min calculated for 0.655 af (78% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 44.0 min ( 858.8 - 814.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 Elevation (feet) 871.00 872.00 873.00 874.00 875.00 876.00 871.00' 35,083 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc) Surf.Area (sq -ft) 4,785 5,604 6,485 7,426 8,429 9,493 Device Routing Invert Inc.Store (cubic -feet) 0 5,195 6,045 6,956 7,928 8,961 Outlet Devices Cum.Store (cubic -feet) 0 5,195 11,239 18,195 26,122 35,083 #1 Primary 868.50' #2 Device 1 #3 Device 1 #4 Device 3 #5 Primary 872.50' 868.50' 871.00' 875.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 85.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 868.50' / 857.70' S= 0.1271 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf 27.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area 8.0' long x 8.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.43 2.54 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.68 2.66 2.64 2.64 2.64 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.70 2.74 erimary OutFlow Max=6.92 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=873.31' (Free Discharge) - 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 6.92 cfs @ 8.82 fps) 2=Orifice/Grate (Passes < 16.71 cfs potential flow) Orifice/Grate (Passes < 2.02 cfs potential flow) 4=Exfiltration (Passes < 0.13 cfs potential flow) - 5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40 Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Hydrograph 7:-/ 6/ 5/ 4/ 3/ 2/ 0/ 9/ 8/ 7/ 6/ 57/ 4V 3V 2V 0 I � I 15.45 cfs Infloii re X2.2 1laci Peak elev 8 .31' 6.92 cfs T T T T T T T T .1 876 875- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Stage -Area -Storage Surface/Horizontal/Wetted Area (sq -ft) 0 500 1,0001,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 T w 874- 8 0 w 873 872- 871 0 Custom Stage Data 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Storage (cubic -feet) 25,000 30,000 35,000 • Inflow ❑ Primary Surface 0 Storage ECUMEN STILLWATER - PROPOSED CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER PROPOSED Type 1124 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 41 Stage -Discharge for Pond 2P: FILTRATION BASIN 2 Elevation Primary Elevation Primary (feet) (cfs) (feet) (cfs) 871.00 0.00 873.60 7.16 871.05 0.09 873.65 7.20 871.10 0.09 873.70 7.23 871.15 0.09 873.75 7.27 871.20 0.09 873.80 7.31 871.25 0.09 873.85 7.35 871.30 0.09 873.90 7.39 871.35 0.09 873.95 7.42 871.40 0.09 874.00 7.46 871.45 0.10 874.05 7.50 871.50 0.10 874.10 7.54 871.55 0.10 874.15 7.57 871.60 0.10 874.20 7.61 871.65 0.10 874.25 7.65 871.70 0.10 874.30 7.68 871.75 0.10 874.35 7.72 871.80 0.10 874.40 7.75 871.85 0.10 874.45 7.79 871.90 0.10 874.50 7.83 871.95 0.10 874.55 7.86 872.00 0.10 874.60 7.90 872.05 0.10 874.65 7.93 872.10 0.11 874.70 7.97 872.15 0.11 874.75 8.00 872.20 0.11 874.80 8.04 872.25 0.11 874.85 8.07 872.30 0.11 874.90 8.10 872.35 0.11 874.95 8.14 872.40 0.11 875.00 8.17 872.45 0.11 875.05 8.42 872.50 0.11 875.10 8.86 872.55 0.37 875.15 9.40 872.60 0.84 875.20 10.05 872.65 1.46 875.25 10.80 872.70 2.18 875.30 11.64 872.75 3.01 875.35 12.57 872.80 3.91 875.40 13.58 872.85 4.90 875.45 14.70 872.90 5.97 875.50 15.92 872.95 6.63 875.55 17.22 873.00 6.67 875.60 18.61 873.05 6.72 875.65 19.91 873.10 6.76 875.70 21.26 873.15 6.80 875.75 22.66 873.20 6.84 875.80 24.10 873.25 6.88 875.85 25.58 873.30 6.92 875.90 27.10 873.35 6.96 875.95 28.67 873.40 7.00 876.00 30.27 873.45 7.04 873.50 7.08 873.55 7.12 <EXIA> EXISTING DA 1A EXISTING DA 1B <Subca> EXISTING DA 2A EXISTING DA 2B Reach EXISTING DA 2C EXISTING DA 3A Link 1R TOTAL Routing Diagram for 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER_EXISTING Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC ECUMEN STILLWATER - 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Prepared by Microsoft HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC EXISTING CONDITIONS Printed 9/15/2017 Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 10.502 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (EX1A, EX1B, EX2A, EX2B, EX2C, EX3A) 0.828 98 Paved parking, HSG B (EX1A, EX1B, EX2A, EX2B, EX2C, EX3A) 11.331 64 TOTAL AREA ECUMEN STILLWATER - 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Prepared by Microsoft HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC EXISTING CONDITIONS Printed 9/15/2017 Page 3 Area (acres) Soil Listing (all nodes) Soil Subcatchment Group Numbers 0.000 11.331 0.000 0.000 0.000 11.331 HSG A HSG B EX1A, EX1B, EX2A, EX2B, EX2C, EX3A HSG C HSG D Other TOTAL AREA ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Prepared by Microsoft HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (all nodes) Printed 9/15/2017 Page 4 HSG -A HSG -B HSG -C HSG -D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 10.502 0.000 0.000 0.000 10.502 >75% Grass cover, Good EX1A, EX1B, EX2A, EX2B, EX2C, EX3A 0.000 0.828 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.828 Paved parking EX1A, EX1B, EX2A, EX2B, EX2C, EX3A 0.000 11.331 0.000 0.000 0.000 11.331 TOTAL AREA ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX1A: EXISTING DA 1A RunoffArea=57,012 sf 3.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.32" Tc=10.0 min CN=62 Runoff=0.42 cfs 0.035 af Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B Runoff Area=86,386 sf 33.29% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.73" Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=2.13 cfs 0.121 af Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A Runoff Area=52,768 sf 4.68% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.35" Tc=10.0 min CN=63 Runoff=0.46 cfs 0.035 af Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B Runoff Area=76,622 sf 0.38% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.29" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.47 cfs 0.043 af Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C Runoff Area=57,064 sf 3.41 % Impervious Runoff Depth>0.32" Tc=10.0 min CN=62 Runoff=0.42 cfs 0.035 of Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A Runoff Area=163,711 sf 0.28% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.29" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=1.01 cfs 0.091 af Reach 1 R: TOTAL Inflow=4.84 cfs 0.360 af Outflow=4.84 cfs 0.360 af Total Runoff Area = 11.331 ac Runoff Volume = 0.360 af Average Runoff Depth = 0.38" 92.69% Pervious = 10.502 ac 7.31% Impervious = 0.828 ac ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: EXISTING DA 1A = 0.42 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth> 0.32" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 2,162 98 54,850 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 57,012 62 54,850 2,162 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 96.21% Pervious Area 3.79% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: EXISTING DA 1A Hydrograph .46 / :42, hype 1� h 0.4 38✓- I'R�aJG.O .34�/�-,.yam ;moi■ .32VLR�no A ea 5((17 yoo12 st 0.3=�— —Runoff 28� Runo I � g� � .26✓� o#f pt>V.L .24 0.222y c=100 0 TnIir— .18-_ LL .16= VV 14y,1 12� 0.1 = 081"/ .06=� .04=� 0.42 cfs H 4 11 4 4 4 4 I� 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B = 2.13 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.121 af, Depth> 0.73" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 28,760 98 Paved parking, HSG B 57,626 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 86,386 73 Weighted Average 57,626 66.71% Pervious Area 28,760 33.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0 LL 2-1 Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B Hydrograph l�y�e II 24-h- 2.13 cfs -11f1IR Rainfali= . 0" Runoff Area 86,386 sf Runoff Volume=0.121' af cu�off Dept>0.T3" c - =1 00 . min tN=73 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A = 0.46 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth> 0.35" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 2,468 98 50,300 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 52,768 63 50,300 2,468 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 95.32% Pervious Area 4.68% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0.5 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A Hydrograph 0.48 00.46 .44 @ Ili* -1 4 0.46 cfs — I 4 004 —4 -R Fik /L60A 328ii/ 0.36- I Ruoff A6ea052768 SIf 0.34_ — — (10314110ffolume=0. 3 of R o#f p>9 5" I 0 0.24 1 /LO m i n 0.2 0.18= NL6 0.16' 0.14 0.1 0.12= 0.08V 0.06= 0.045 0.02 H 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 114 I—[ 4 I+ - 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B = 0.47 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.043 af, Depth> 0.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 76,331 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 76,622 61 Weighted Average 76,331 99.62% Pervious Area 291 0.38% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0 LL 0.52= 0.5. 0.48= 0.46- 0.44 0.42 0.4. 0.38= 0.36- 0.34 0.32 t 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22- 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12= 0.1 0.08 0.06= 0.04 0.02 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B Hydrograph 0 Runoff i fi I- 1 H 0.47 cfs 'I �, ieI1 4!I_hi Ru toff ,I ea 716 622 sf / , /-G=6 z / ic=-1 r°#P09 o )kI �0 - min- H ll u -h ,=9.°433= I I of - II II I III 14- 1 II IIII III I`I 111 I III IIS -I4-IL-4Airz 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C = 0.42 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth> 0.32" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 1,944 98 55,120 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 57,064 62 55,120 1,944 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 96.59% Pervious Area 3.41% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C Hydrograph .46 .44 .42 0.4 .38 .36 .34_ .32 0.3= � .28 .26= 22 o.z .18 16=� .141 12� 0.1 08z .06=� .044 02=� l�y�e ftI4� hi 0.42 cfs runoff st —RunoffuTrn =9.035 uio#f pt >O32" c=1 0J) min H 4 11 4 4 4 4 I� 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A = 1.01 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.091 af, Depth> 0.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 459 98 Paved parking, HSG B 163,252 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 163,711 61 Weighted Average 163,252 99.72% Pervious Area 459 0.28% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0 Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A Hydrograph 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff 1 1.01 cfs Ir l -i1;el i i4 -hi 1 -Y1f1IR RainfaII= . 0" I Runoff Area 163,711 sf Funoff Volume=0.091 af u1off Deipti>0.29" c=10.0 min cN=61 I l I 1 10,,,E 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff 5- 4- ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 2 -YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Reach 1 R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 11.331 ac, 7.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.38" for 2 -YR event Inflow = 4.84 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.360 af Outflow = 4.84 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.360 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1 R: TOTAL Hydrograph 2- 0 Inflow Area=11.3 4 Urs 4.84 cfs 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Outflow ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX1A: EXISTING DA 1A RunoffArea=57,012 sf 3.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.97" Tc=10.0 min CN=62 Runoff=1.80 cfs 0.106 of Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B Runoff Area=86,386 sf 33.29% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.67" Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=5.09 cfs 0.276 af Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A Runoff Area=52,768 sf 4.68% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.02" Tc=10.0 min CN=63 Runoff=1.79 cfs 0.103 of Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B Runoff Area=76,622 sf 0.38% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=2.25 cfs 0.134 of Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C Runoff Area=57,064 sf 3.41 % Impervious Runoff Depth>0.97" Tc=10.0 min CN=62 Runoff=1.80 cfs 0.106 of Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A Runoff Area=163,711 sf 0.28% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=4.80 cfs 0.286 af Reach 1R: TOTAL Inflow=17.51 cfs 1.010 af Outflow=17.51 cfs 1.010 of Total Runoff Area = 11.331 ac Runoff Volume = 1.010 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.07" 92.69% Pervious = 10.502 ac 7.31% Impervious = 0.828 ac ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: EXISTING DA 1A = 1.80 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Depth> 0.97" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 2,162 98 54,850 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 57,012 62 54,850 2,162 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 96.21% Pervious Area 3.79% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 2 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: EXISTING DA 1A Hydrograph lyii.)e 11 244hrJ 1.80 cfs 10 -YR Rainfall 4.20" Runoff Area 57,012 sf Funoff Vo1ume=0.106 af cu,off Deipt->0:97" c=10.0 min cN=62 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B = 5.09 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.276 af, Depth> 1.67" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 28,760 98 Paved parking, HSG B 57,626 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 86,386 73 Weighted Average 57,626 66.71% Pervious Area 28,760 33.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B Hydrograph 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff 5.09 cfs 'I1 )ell14-hrs 10 -YR RaiiifiII4.20" Runoff Area=86,386 sf Funoff Volume=0.276 af ccuio 7ept1>1.!7" 1 =0 min 61s1'=713 T / 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A = 1.79 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.103 af, Depth> 1.02" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 2,468 98 Paved parking, HSG B 50,300 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 52,768 63 Weighted Average 50,300 95.32% Pervious Area 2,468 4.68% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0 LL Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A Hydrograph lyli.)e 11 244hrJ r 1.79 cfs 10 -YR Rainfall 4.20" Runoff Area=52,768 sf Funoff Volume=0.103 af caioff Deipt,>1:92" c=10.0 min cN= 63 / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B = 2.25 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.134 af, Depth> 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 76,331 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 76,622 61 Weighted Average 76,331 99.62% Pervious Area 291 0.38% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 2Y 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B Hydrograph lyde SII X14-hr� 2.25 cfs 10-7YR Rai%faI I=4.2o" Runoff Area 76,622 sf Funoff Volume=0.134 af cu�off Deipti>0.91" e=100rain cN=61 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C = 1.80 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Depth> 0.97" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 1,944 98 55,120 61 Paved parking, HSG B >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 57,064 62 55,120 1,944 Tc Length (min) (feet) Weighted Average 96.59% Pervious Area 3.41% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 2 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C Hydrograph lyii.)e 11 244hrJ 1.80 cfs 10 -YR Rainfall 4.20" Runoff Area 57,064 sf Funoff Vo1ume=0.106 af cu,off Deipt->0:97" c=10.0 min cN=62 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A = 4.80 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.286 af, Depth> 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 459 98 Paved parking, HSG B 163,252 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 163,711 61 Weighted Average 163,252 99.72% Pervious Area 459 0.28% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 51 4- 2 Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A Hydrograph lyii.)e 11 244hrJ 4.80 cfs 1O -YR Rai%fall 4.26" Runoff Area=163711 sf uoff Volume=9.286 af u.1off Deipti>0.91" c =1 c 00 min GAN=61 — - 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 10 -YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Reach 1 R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = 11.331 ac, 7.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.07" for 10 -YR event 17.51 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.010 af 17.51 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.010 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1 R: TOTAL Hydrograph _/ / 10=/ 9V 8- 7 / 67 4= � 3. / 2_ ± 1 17 'i1 rf 17.51 cfs 4 4 1— 1- 11 4 I-- 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Inflow 0 Outflow ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 1124 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Time span=0.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 2401 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentEX1A: EXISTING DA 1A RunoffArea=57,012 sf 3.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.01" Tc=10.0 min CN=62 Runoff=6.08 cfs 0.329 af Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B Runoff Area=86,386 sf 33.29% Impervious Runoff Depth>4.18" Tc=10.0 min CN=73 Runoff=12.75 cfs 0.692 af Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A Runoff Area=52,768 sf 4.68% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.12" Tc=10.0 min CN=63 Runoff=5.83 cfs 0.315 af Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B Runoff Area=76,622 sf 0.38% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=7.89 cfs 0.427 af Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C Runoff Area=57,064 sf 3.41 % Impervious Runoff Depth>3.01" Tc=10.0 min CN=62 Runoff=6.09 cfs 0.329 af Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A Runoff Area=163,711 sf 0.28% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.91" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 Runoff=16.85 cfs 0.912 af Reach 1 R: TOTAL Inflow=55.47 cfs 3.003 af Outflow=55.47 cfs 3.003 af Total Runoff Area = 11.331 ac Runoff Volume = 3.003 af Average Runoff Depth = 3.18" 92.69% Pervious = 10.502 ac 7.31% Impervious = 0.828 ac ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX1A: EXISTING DA 1A = 6.08 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.329 af, Depth> 3.01" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 2,162 98 Paved parking, HSG B 54,850 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 57,012 62 Weighted Average 54,850 96.21% Pervious Area 2,162 3.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX1A: EXISTING DA 1A Hydrograph ' _ 5_ _ , = I 6.08 cfs -4 "Ie 14-h r 1 aci-NiiR hlaiinfai " 0" Runoff Area0517,012 sf l uipoff Vo!upi=9.3-[29-afj ujioff 7eptji>3.91' T =1 c o-.0 min 6NL61 1 1 2 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B = 12.75 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.692 af, Depth> 4.18" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 28,760 98 Paved parking, HSG B 57,626 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 86,386 73 Weighted Average 57,626 66.71% Pervious Area 28,760 33.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 0 LL Subcatchment EX1 B: EXISTING DA 1B Hydrograph 3/ 2-/ 1- 4 12.75 cfs vz 110o -11R aiin�fal � 0"� Ruhoff Area 86,386 sf 9=// Ru iaff VoiIu1ne 0.692 a 8-/ f Dep_!">I" 18 cL1 .0mir 5_ N-7 l 4Y7 3- 2; 147 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A = 5.83 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.315 af, Depth> 3.12" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 2,468 98 Paved parking, HSG B 50,300 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 52,768 63 Weighted Average 50,300 95.32% Pervious Area 2,468 4.68% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 5/ 4 0 3 LL Subcatchment EX2A: EXISTING DA 2A Hydrograph ly1;e 11114-hrJ 5.83 cfs 10d -1R Raiinait=X1.30" Runoff Area=52,768 sf F�ul�off Volum =9.315af 7u�off Dept>I3.12" c=10.0 min 6NL63 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B = 7.89 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.427 af, Depth> 2.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 291 98 Paved parking, HSG B 76,331 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 76,622 61 Weighted Average 76,331 99.62% Pervious Area 291 0.38% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 7/ 6� LL 4 1 1 Subcatchment EX2B: EXISTING DA 2B Hydrograph l�y�e �II14-hrs i 10i -Y10 Raiinfa �l�30" —Runoff Area 76,622 sf Runoff Volu1ner9.42Taf u�noff Depti>�2.1" c=1(0 min 7.89 cfs GN= 61 I I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 19 Time (hours) P 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C = 6.09 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.329 af, Depth> 3.01" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 1,944 98 Paved parking, HSG B 55,120 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 57,064 62 Weighted Average 55,120 96.59% Pervious Area 1,944 3.41% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 0 LL Direct Entry, Subcatchment EX2C: EXISTING DA 2C Hydrograph ' _ 5_ - / = 6.09 cfs -4 "Ie 14-h r 1 aci-NiiR hR intaiI. 0" Runoff Area0517,064 sf l uinoff Vol u-171=9.3-[29-af ujioff 7eptji>3.91' T =1 c o—.0 min 6NL61 I o 1 2 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Runoff Summary for Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A = 16.85 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.912 af, Depth> 2.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Area (sf) CN Description 459 98 Paved parking, HSG B 163,252 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 163,711 163,252 459 61 Weighted Average 99.72% Pervious Area 0.28% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, 1 1 1 0 LL Subcatchment EX3A: EXISTING DA 3A Hydrograph 8' / 7- / 6=' 4= / 3/ 2/ 1=/ 16.85 cfs - T 1100-14t iira aII 0'� LR h0Tf Aea 163;711 �sf aDoff Volume=0.9-12 of 0 / u Felpt!i> 9'�' 9 � 1 in � � 0 Tn 7�la 611' — 6/ I — i 5= 3 / —[ 2 L F T- — -J 7 7I t 1 1 11 1— rt - t 1 t 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) • Runoff ECUMEN STILLWATER - EXISTING CONDITIONS 17055 - ECUMEN STILLWATER EXISTING Type 11 24 -hr 100 -YR Rainfall=7.30" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 9/15/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02202 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Reach 1 R: TOTAL [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 11.331 ac, 7.31% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.18" for 100 -YR event Inflow = 55.47 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 3.003 af Outflow = 55.47 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 3.003 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1 R: TOTAL Hydrograph 60_/ 50- 45- 40_ 35- 30- 25 20- 15 - / A 1 cg d7 rf .3‘,5 I5.47 cfs 4 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 0 Inflow 0 Outflow r 854.9 858.6 Jrlr-u 7 3 0 858.7 :58.7 854.8 864 Y- 855.1 855.1 6,0 6 3191 // 63,9 g6 -.a .A863.1, 86 .1, ,46 62. ---------------- s 6 64.E / / 46 SH 859.5 2,0 86 85 85 9.8 SMA22-2STEMS 3193 546.8 SMA38 3194 546.8 SMA15 3189 546.8 3188 551.7 WI17 BJ10 854.9 866 1 I I 1 I I 85.5 853.2 C.) O 854,41-- 854.5 54,41--854.5 0 54.5 0) W 859.5 X 96 5 ASH1 3.8 86 59,4 960,6 86e 4 3632,E �`.\ ` 3179 552.3 3187 CRABS 553.1 3172 BE7 544.7 3182 P09 548.6 P010 3181 �548.6 p 9.3 ❑10 • • • • 863,6 69 3169 544.7 P09 3178 552.3 CRA:. 3173 544.7 ,111, P09 3STEMS 3176 542.2 CH7 5 8 / X 3 ,3 7 3S • • 9,1 3177 542.2 CRAB8 3 • • • • • • ,0 • • idewalk a19.9 Sch. B - EROSION CONTROL 1 44,6 07 3160 1•' 546.6 46.3 07 09 3 59 3140 3141 p087 544,4 P❑6 3142 547,' P09 x 863.1 • • • • • • • 863,6 • • • 86 143 45.9 08 • • • • 0 PROVIDE SILT FENCE AROUND FILTRATION BASIN TO PROTECT UNTIL SITE IS FULLY ESTABLISHED, TYP. 321 ♦ 48.9 P1. 557, 37P07 5, 08 50,4 ` ;6 57 STEM _•06_.. 3149 541.6 P06 3150 541.4 60.4 P07 863X 8635 863'2• BE963'1 WETLAND AREA D 57,074.67 SF 86 963,5 3148 54.7 6 1 80 565.g. X 982' X 883,2 540 .5 H1 869 2 861,9 8. \x, 1.5 \I1, 860.6 ------x 861.31_2,0 1 862' 859.9 FOUND RLS#10938--& _� 8614 X858.8 FI .75 O�V-860 I V 856.8 62,1 862.1 g62,4 962,2 ,0 6 X 886.3 x885. FOUND 1/2" )R� S77.50, 00" 775p.00" 2 - ��> 811, )(e9'5 )(B9‘6 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS. 86869 862.0 61,6 SMH IN 601 ----- 861,9 860,5 CBFL INV -3.1 RIM=861.36 INV.=849.36 859.4 cn 60.9 161,5 S 861,1 61 1 A U 859.5 TY A (SESC 85 :.7 ,\11, 130 "0 ERO:6041:L04873'3\4 PERIMETER 4 SION CON45 T\I1 AT CONSTRUCTION WI12 LIMITS, TYP. 39804' `, \ 859. -7 PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. 8 6 69. 31 8.1 CW 41 2 859.3 MA14 3051 860.1 MA12 3048 859.2 CW29 3049 859.1 WI16 5 -- 305560 859.7 W I17 3057 860.1 CW24 3 8 3040 860.1 CW21 y%6 O f 91 3121 866. N14 8 4N 8 ` • • ❑b►_ ♦♦ 7 311E •� 651 E .012 15` WNA 11- LJ 864. 2 0 9 ,9 3062 860,9 WN7 9 1,6 861' 61 -7 J60 1.1 N7306 861, WN1 V22301,1 w X61,9 CW24 861.1 0 00 ,_pW CW24 30 . • 3033 302 € 62.0 CW22 8360C3,1:50012.14733 1 0 861.0 861. •��' 066 N8 10 125 E L 8 0 PROVIDE SILT FENCE AROUND FILTRATION BASIN;. TO PROTECT UNTIL SITE IS '' FUL�,aflESTABLISHED,�T11P. \ 860,9 3t 3023 , C\,/33 86,q�1 302'9 •23 `.� EC8>9�x861.1- fr - :- -: .. T W •�- )8 8 �c 6 sO 861 1(is ,•• WN/1c • 6 ?� \./N7 EL1 \♦ •` ♦ S63 -,9-4_b 0• ♦,1 • 1 '-. - --- ♦♦ I ♦ '104,9 ♦♦ i pIPE FOUND N8 of N1/2 of SE1 85 W 869' 100 31111 869.8 870. EL5 064 310 8710 4 T X • 111 64 06 ` =isg5 6 WN WN7 085 117 865,9 862 8'90 66 8 2 8 f 63 61.4 L6 019 862.1 TP 62 ,o 3021 862,4 El -06Z,1 62,3 862'8X ^8 3026 \8�6�0..9 3027 WN13861.4 g63.3 86„ 62.8 X 3020 862.1 WN s3633 863,6 b EL4 3082 X'., 3651 06, EL8 64,9 N . ,_,_ 0W4 RW4 8 .6 864 31j 4 10 100.4 4,3 4 864'�I .4,4 21642 G`,1 8645 RLS# 13774 865.0 I I •41 I \ a. CONSTRUCtipN ENTRANCE 1. F /gbLS# 13774 1 So. line M of '0', e • 0 0 0 0 ro rri FOUItO I I OI 01 of of (nI N8919'36"E RLS# NOT LEGIBLE X 1� .83)3(. -A 9 -0.6g17.6 6,6 81 .9 6,2 Bra 3w -- n < 8-769)( IOTA 882 3;7 — INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP. 76.6 816SX 817 ,2 .1(11,8 pS 9,1 816.6 81 6• ,7 76 6543 2624 �n4 WN7 h , I4b. L+ 87 EX.BLDG. 3,3 812. PERIME 4,o r EROSION CONT AT CONSTRUC LIMITS, 316 300.00 916'1 !. LI NV, 8 3 P 31 96 16 2,4 28 LJ 9165X j,81'41' 816,1 100.00 1 157.00 X81 1 871,6 0 0 816,6 C8 S ,4 816.3 P 8 5.8 .3 x r� u' g15'9 - /D1 - 5 815. 4 1.q tic 815'8 815,9 X 815,6' 815' A74:4ftNv 816,0 816'9 �c 16.0 `I 8 ,0 1 811'X911,2 163 1 X971 :11,0 ,8 975,9g-75,5 816'1Xg162 L 3 S Y V) U o LC) c 0 J -0 T a> a) 0) (/1 U) c g764 4 814,6 854 869 6.1 EXISTING BUILDING 0 17 ,3 866.B xe6-1' a-11.3. 869 3 SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF STILLWATER. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF STILLWATER EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL PRIOR TO TREE REMOVAL ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY, WATERSHED AND THE PROJECT ENGINEER AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE. LEGEND: • 1137 liNNO EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1-1Z7Z7Z-Zi EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 r LLWATER ECUMEN-ST 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 0 LLI 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1 .0 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 851 ftm ft. MONO (1- p,<<'‘ ` ��r�V' /546 'k z z \ / 'rr rr ri i r WETLA 859.901 SF JI'Ift1 7 3190 546. 44ASH 11ir ir 3186 553, ASH1 SMA22-2STEMS 3193 546.8 .1 1, 3184 litiN:K811 * ,53. x ' '�$0g 51� v08 do 3188 551.7 WI17 SMA38 3194 546.8 SMA15 3189 546.8 B,&110 3187 553.1 BE73182 548.6 P010111 548,6 P❑10 3179 552.3 CRABS 3172 544.7 P09 TRATION BASIN 2 BOTTOM OE=872.50 100 -YR HWL=873.31 878 • •• • • • • PROVIDE SILT FENCE AROUND FILTRATION ASIN 7 0 PROTECT UNTIL SIT. IS HED, TY 1t:� : %❑7 '-'09P08 5•4,1.9 6 344 7 P❑8 '`3 \ �� 010 PERZER 1 46,3 4 ffr-w* J8 EROSIONROL • 548 P06 31536 199 LIMIT 557.7 55 2 P06 101.01-41011110/. 202 548.9 P06 3169 544.7 P09 3178 552.3 CRA 3173 544.7 P09 3STEMS 3176 542.2 3177 CH7 542.2 CRAB8 3140550. 3141 P❑87 544.4 I06 547 5 31 - 57 RMS P0 • WitroAlb • 154 313'k:41..44 40IPPP - .--fit4144,1,;-:._ BE4._j%'%4V 552 miler NO- Norw os. 59 143 45,9 08 09 315 557.7 3145 31 537,9 554,R • 877 314 554.7 • 3149 541.6 P06 3150 541,4 P07 P08 552.2 P06 • • • • Oiep• • WETLAND AREA D 57,074.67 SF 85.5 878 A#1 • P07 PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. 89 Miami, -1.1\ MEM. tIO mEMME1MME71... AM 14/00) • • • • • • • • • • • • • 863.1 • • • • • • • • • • • CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS. • • • • • • FOUND RLS#10938-- INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP. SMH 11-12 861.4 501 34 CO CO 045 3046 PERIMETER 59,4 81'9 2 EROSION CONTROPL225°487 AT CONSTRUC ION w1129 LIMITS, TYP. MEW MEOW ANEW VEN • • • ‘,7r r • • • 30140 to 3048 859,2 3049 859,1 859.2 ryj Tr) 860,9 12 W22306, C3,002,6:: C \./ 2 4 052 WN7 • ts cs to It it 111 • • • ontsmimmosommommon tIMENNEarAlk Whirl MM MM mow Immo. M 87.6 I ET PROTEC ION AT CATCH BASIN . • MENOMONEE morir EMIL NNW NEEMANNEk 5111 ilidEMENELAZII =NEEL 1_1110 865 3035 861.0 00 861,1 (21- 3033 302 ROVIDE SILT FENCE PRO CT UNTIL SITE IS 860,9 j_ 3023 -W23 860,1 30E"V 066 62.0 N8 1 60 5 60 055 59,7 117 3057 860.1 8,61.1 861 • • 3063 861,4 C'r) 3019 862,1 EL6 TP 3021 862.4 EL8 3026 860.9 861.4 WN }‘e • 3020 862,1 FILTRATION BASIN 1 BOTTOM EL .=864.00 OE=865.50 100 -YR HWL 67.36 RLS# 13774 tri co cs) cp, k0 FOLVD / MOEN II s Erumt • 1 1i o o RLSit 1'1°1. LEGIBLE 157.00 CO 09 1 - INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS, TYP. &\. 8-4 rip NMI =Mir CONSTRUCTION LIMIT EX. BLDG. 100.00 tri o o a) EXISTING BUILDIN )8-17 '3 • 877 MOM 869 870 CONTROL TRUCTION LIMITS, oh oh ,ogisTRumoN RAI RLS# 13774 So. line of N1/ SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSO REQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF STILLWATER. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF STILLWATER EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL PRIOR TO TREE REMOVAL. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY, WATERSHED AND THE PROJECT ENGINEER AS SOON AS REASONABLY POSSIBLE. LEGEND: • 1137 EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL DRAINAGE ARROW ■ SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1-1Z7777/) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GOPHER STATE ONE CALL WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG (800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE (651) 454-0002 LOCAL CD Civil Engineering . Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Pr L, 'AL LLWATER ECUMEN-ST 0 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 0 LLI 0 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO • 17055 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS W 1 . 1 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. OVERFLOW IS % OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY EXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX, AND GRATE NOTES: 1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEM AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C. FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC CURB INLET FILTER N TS TO CONSTRUCTION AREA ors • r%orsitdatimdat TO CONSTRUCTION AREA FINISHED GRADE 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP PA • oaf 4, z PLAN No: ,40 ors •-•- 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM 35' R , 12 tog • •• at -"star* 35' R EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY EXISTING UNDISTURBED GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 4" HIGH, 18" WIDE SPEED BUMP PROFILE lIIlllIIIlllIIIlllIIIll IIIlllIIIlllIIIlllIIll ROADWAY NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N TS 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH -'tl@l 1�II81111=1111111=IIIIIIII = IIIIII 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. Y il' II 1===:111111111-Mlii1111E-111111V=11'1111 — - 'E' OVERFALL 111111 IIIllillll ViIIIV 1111111 �—=-IIIIII YY k 111111=111i�, 111111111=,IIIIIII-11111 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET N TS - 11/- TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE YY EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED FILLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO EMBED ROLL. DIRECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8". 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. MIN Elm NMI MN MN ■ SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS iiiii mmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmm iiiiii••; GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2013 # MNR100001 PAGES 1-35) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP (PART III.A) THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (PART III.B) 6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 12. INSTALL STREET SECTION 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) (PART III.C) 18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION (PART III.E): THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN PART II.C. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE PART IV.E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER PART III.F.1 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (0 & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS: 1. ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). 2. THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTION MANNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION PREVENTION (PART IV.B): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION, SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART IV.E. ARE COMPLIED WITH. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE NEXT WORK DAY WHEN EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT BUT MUST COMPLY WITH PART IV.C.5. SOILS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER (AS DESIGNATED BY THE MINNESOTA DNR) MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMES. THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEED NOTES (PART III.A.4.A): ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. SEDIMENT CONTROL (PART IV.C): SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. a. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. b. IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4, A. THROUGH C. c. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART IV.G. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND THE PERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER) VERIFYING THE NEED FOR REMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP OR AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. WHEN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE CAN NOT BE OBTAINED IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE SPECIFIC INLET PROTECTION CAN BE REMOVED TO ALLEVIATE THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY CONCERN. HOWEVER, EFFORTS TO OBTAIN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. PERMISSION TO REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED ON A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN MUST STILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REMOVAL. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (OR ONTO STREETS WITHIN THE SITE) MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BMPS SUCH AS STONE PADS, CONCRETE OR STEEL WASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET (SEE PART IV.E.4.D.). THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND, UNLESS INFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THE SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. METHODS FOR MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS TO BE LEFT UN -COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN PART III.B. OF THIS PERMIT. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (PART IV.D): DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARY SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (PART IV.E): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER AND WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER THAT. CONTINUE INSPECTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. THIS MODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SWPPP ON SITE AND THEN FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED TOPSOIL. THIS REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. SEE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR SITE SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (PART IV.F): THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE; SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. CONCRETE WASHOUT: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER THE GROUND IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY ALSO OCCUR OFF SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. FUELING OPERATION PLAN: ALL FUELING SHALL TAKE PLACE AT THE DESIGNATED FUELING LOCATION AND ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR SITE FUELING OPERATIONS AS TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SPILLS. SPILL PREVENTION PLAN: ALL SPILLS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP AFTER DISCOVERY. THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAY-TO-DAY ONSITE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION COORDINATOR AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING CLEAN UP PROCEDURES, POSTING CLEAN UP RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ENSURING PROPER CLEAN UP TRAINING OF APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL. SANITARY AND SEPTIC WASTE: SANITARY/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND SANITARY CONDITION, FOR THE USE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES. A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS WILL COLLECT SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS. FINAL STABILIZATION (PART IV.G): THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION G. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTION OF THE SITE (THAT HAS NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION ) TO ANOTHER PARTY. A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF TERMINATION / PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW OWNER. THE ORIGINAL CURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) AND SWPPP PLAN SHEETS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES TRAINING (PART III.A.2) DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 1/13/14-1/13114 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2017 AREAS AND QUANTITIES (PART III.A.4.B&C): OWNER INFORMATION OWNER: ECUMEN 3530 LEXINGTON AVE N SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 CONTACT: 651-766-4300 SITE AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDING COVERAGE ALL PAVEMENTS ALL NON -PAVEMENTS EXISTING 32,320 SF 4.9% 107,937 SF 16.4% 516,689 SF 78.7% TOTAL SITE AREA 656,946 5F 100.0% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION 140,257 SF PROPOSED CONDITION NORTH LOT 122,345 SF PROPOSED CONDITION SOUTH LOT 106,290 SF DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 88,378 SF IMPERVIOUS TOTAL 228,635 SF 5.2487 21.3% 18.6% 16.2% 13.5% 34.8% PROPOSED NORTH LOT (SENIOR CENTER) 57,848 SF 64,497 SF 349,711 SF 472,056 SF 122,345 SF 106,290 SF 12.3% 13.7% 74.1% PROPOSED SOUTH LOT (CHURCH) 31,908 SF 17.3% 74,382 SF 40.2% 78,600 SF 42.5% 100.0% 184,890 SF EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES DISTURBED AREA 293,192 SF SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL 3,000 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±18 EA NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP CONTACT PERSON CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE: ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: THIS PROJECT INVOLVES CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY ON A CURRENTLY VACANT LOT WITH PARKING. SITE, GRADING, UTILITIES, AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO BOTH LILLY LAKE AND LONG LAKE LAKE - LILLY LAKE AND LONG LAKE ARE IDENTIFIED AS IMPAIRED WATER BODIES PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. LONG LAKE AND LONG LAKE ARE IMPAIRED FOR NUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS. BECAUSE THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT C.1 AND C.2 IN APPENDIX A APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PART III.C. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. 2. POST CONSTRUCTION:THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN PART III.D. SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. SEE PART III.D.1. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. 100.0% VT O M Civil Engineering = Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Prit v Ilk 'A, aa wi.ls© urchrte 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 N H U W H 2 U ce z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 1 0/27/1 7 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.3 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT o CR, a G3 Civil Engineering • Surveying 4931 W. 35th St. Louis civilsitegroup.com o CD Street, Park, C M • Landscape Suite 200 MN 55416 612-615-0060 ,e,o p Architecture CiiiilSite - , ., ,i • 'CIVIL Site . . . . .._ Clivil . Ite yijSJte_ . . PF 1 yr aas 1 wLson li, AL rchit a R. Lt ke G R 0 IJ P rl General Site Information (III.A) 0 IEK. tt% P N/A Dates of construction (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs. Include address if available.) Construction start date: 11/17 Estimated completion date: 11/18 1. Minnesota Pollution Attachment A: General Construction Project Information Describe the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs). Include the timing for installation and procedures used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary. (III.A.4.a) 9. Identify adjacent public waters where the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has declared 'work in water restrictions" during fish spawning timeframes N/A �- Control Agency THE PROJECT WILL BE PROTECTED BY TWO (2) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. [ f } P Site Speci Document Y Describe the construction activity [what will be built, general timeline, line, etc): THE PROJECT WILL BE THE CONSTRUCTION 520 Lafayette Road North •+ •e A t i L SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE ANDMONITORED AS Selection of a Permanent Stormwater Management SystemIIID. Si Paul, MN 55155-4t4A OF A SENIOR LIVING FACILTIY ON A VACANT SITE. ) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Pian(SINPPP) NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY 1. Will the Impervious to el Yes • No Permit for Construction Activity To comply with the Genera( StormwaterD Describe sail types found at the project: THE EXISTING SOILS AT THE SITE ARE PRIMARILY CLAYEY SAND. project create a new cumulative surface greater than or equal one acre? OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THiS SITE, AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES Doc Type: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILIZED. If yes, a water quality volume of one inch of runoff from the cumulative new impervious surfaces must be retained on site see Part IiLD of the permit) through infiltration unless prohibited due to one of the reasons in Part III.D.1.j. if infiltration is prohibited Construction Activit Information2. Activity Project name: ECUMEN STILLWATER SENSOR LiVING Site Location map - Attach maps (U.S. Geologic Survey 7,5 minute quadrangle, National Wetland Inventory maps or equivalent] showing the location and type of all receiving waters, including wetlands, drainage ditches, stormwater ponds or basins, etc. that will receive runoff from the project Use arrows showing the direction of flow and distance to the water body Attach to this SWPPP a table with the anticipated quantities for the life of the project for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (ill, A. 4.b) SEE PAGE SW 1.3 identify other method of other volume reduction (e.g., filtration system, wet sedimentation basin, regional ponding or equivalent method Project location (Briefly describe where construction activity occurs. Include address if available.) 3. Attach to this SWPPP a site map that Includes the following features (I II.A 3.b - f): 2. Describe which rnethod will be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project (III.D): • Wet basin Address or describe area: 194 BRICK ST. - _ ' `-'� ,k , `-- ' r `. ' f } ' a ' ' - � r, 0 Existing and final grades, including dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre and post-construction Stormwater sedimentation • Infiltration/Filtraton City or Township: STILLWATER State: MN Zip code: 55082 remit; , 4 '� �-= --' , M runoff drainage areas located within theproject limits. • Locations of impervious surfaces and soil types. Regional ponds Latitude/longitude of approximate centroid of project: 45.054265, -92.828262 ,� + • Locations of areas not to be disturbed. • Combination of practices Method of cotlection of latitude/longitude: E GPS < Online tont ■ USGS Topographic map Alt cities where construction will occur: STILLWATER is , 7� - •�', . N • _ "` `& T 1, - �� �; 1 - _• }' f . / . • . _ t - y r • `. i �, " ` , �el - e, - • Location of areas of phased construction • All surface waters and existing wetlands within one mile from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater runoff from the site (identifiable on ma such as USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle maps or equivalent). Where q g surface waters receiving runoff associated with construction activity wi[ not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with an arrow, Indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. Include ail calculations and design information for the method selected, See Part 111.D of the permit for specific requirements associated with each method, INFILTRATION/FILTRATION Calculations are within the Site Storm Water management Report and part of this SWPPP as Attachment D. All counties where construction will occur. WASHINGTON r �_� #;. y - ive ;' ' Methods to be used for final stabilization of all exposed soil areas. 3. If it Is not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for the water quality volume, describe why. This can include proximity to All townships where construction will occur: r " , ;i. ,I , ,} , , . i • * +� Vie. 4. Were Stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of an environmental, archaeological, or other required local, bedrock or road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any permanent Stormwater management Describe what other treatment such as swales smaller ands or cit chambers will be implemented to Project size (number of acres to be disturbed): 6.7 ie r tl • _ -" _ - r ( �' , ' '. state, or federal review of the project? ❑ Yes No If yes, describe how these measures were addressed in the SWPPP. (III.A.8 ) practices. grasses P 9 P g P treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters. (i ILC) ee { r t o •. 1 1 IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME. Project type: y A N!A ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial/Industrial 0 Road construction 0 Residential and road construction I� Other (describe): SENIOR LIVING FACILITY ( ) "--ir~ r• 1, �++ "", ��• �; 2 ' ' l (_' �, { . S. Is the project Located in a karst area such that additional' measures would be necessary to protect drinking water supply management areas as described in Minn. R. chapters 7050 and 7060? ■Yes I� No 4. Far projects that discharge to trout streams, including tributaries to trout streams, identify method of incorporating temperature controls into the permanent stormwater management system. :,yew; le'; If yea, describe the additional measures to be used. (IILA.7.) N/A c�t"ls71 or, A )) t Cumulative impervious surface: m -7i N/A Existing area of impervious surface: 32 (to the nearest tenth acre) t > .;6 3 If 6, Does the site discharge to a calcareous fen listed in Minn. R. 7050.0180, subp. 6,b.? ■ Yes • i No Erosion Prevention Practices (IV. B) Uml Post construction area of impervious surface: 5.2 to the nearest tenth acre p { ) ' ' ' ells 5.:).4.1,800E , „ �. ee ^ Z' i f letter f approval t Minnesota De t o t r r e 'n prior application r I yes, a site o app a a! Pram theDepartment f Natural al Resau ces must b obtained p ar to app cation fa Descrfbe the types of temporary erosion prevention BMPs expected to be implemented on this site during construction. Total new area of impervious surface: 2.0 (to the nearest tenth acre) �_ y -!I� •r ,.- • , ��='' I i` �' '� •, t fa � � 1 ' this permit. (Part I B.6 and Part IIi•A.8) 1. Describe construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to minimize KAAS WILSON ARC H ITE 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTC Receiving waters ; } „, LILY LAKE '-' if - • .�„- � _- 7. Does the site discharge to a water that is listed as impaired for the following poilutant(s) or stressor(s): phosphorus, turbidity, dissolved oxygen or biotic impairment? Use the Special and impaired Waters Search Tool at: www-pca. state.mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-c html. © Yes Na erosion. Delineate areas not to be disturbed (reg., with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc,) before work begins. SILT FENCE WIs L 8E INSTALLER AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE. N co :1( `O Y tt(1 1 L •3 i� LO Water body ID" Name of water body Type (ditch, pond, wetland, lake, stream, river) Special water? (See Stormwater Permit appendix A) impaired Water? (See Stormwater Permit Appendix A] ,[ _r 1 _ f 1 •y , !, +r f # ►r �u = V �, i i _ , . , • ! If no, skip to Training. Does the impaired water have an ap roved Total Maximum Daily toads (TINBL) with an Approved Waste Load Allocation 2, Describe Methods of tem raril stabilizing soils and sail stockpiles e.., mulches, hydraulic tackitiers, erosion blankets, etc, temporarily g p [ 9 Y ) TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTiON WILL I3E SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, Z 82-0021-00 LONG LAKE II Yes ►� No r i Yes • Na ''� ; 1 y air ` for construction activity'? • Yes IXJ No WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. 82-0023-00 LILY LAKE {] Yes Na y Yes 0 No "' �' E a •• -� " '• � }• If yes: 3. Describe Methods of dissipating velocity along stormwater conveyance channels and at channel outlets (e.g., check dams, W ■ Yes ■ No ■Yes ■ No 1 / -, _a te {. � ._ ` !_ - "' " a, List the receiving water, the areas of the site discharging to it, and the pollutant(s) identified in the TMDL. sediment traps, rip rap, etc.): J Q I� ,' g - - e _ _• ! b. List the BMPs and any other specific construction Stormwater related implementation activities identified in the SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RiP RAP AT CHANNEL OUTLETS. D Yes ❑ No ■Yes [] No � - •+ - � j 'Water Body IdenHhcation (ID) might not be available for all avatar bodies. Use the Specie! and Impaired Waters Search Tool at: www.ece.etateereris`peter/storm+wateresrarrRwareechlor. Y," i 1 • r ' t , Q j'' ' F _ � - ,r �I 1 l r 9i Wit: •+„, TMDL' If the site has a discharge point within one mile of the impaired water and the water flows to the impaired water but no 4. Describe Methods to be used for stabilization of ditch and swale wetted perimeters (Note that mulch, hydraulic soil tackifiers, hydrorulches, etc. are not acceptable soil stabilization methods for any pari of a drainage ditch or Swale) J J i- CO N CO � V "• , • • 1 3, r^ ' ice_.__. ,� �� Impairer/ water for the following pollutent(s) orstressor(s): phosphorus, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, orblotic impairment. _ specific BMPs for construction are identified in the TMDL, the additional BMPs in Appendix A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4-trout be to the SWPPP implemented, The BMPs to the FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOB. stream)) must added and (IIl.A.7). additional only apply those portions of project that drain to one of the identified discharge points. 5. Describe Methods to be used for energy dissipation at pipe outlets (e.g., rip rap, splash pads, gabions, etc. www. a.state.mn,us • 651.296.6300 • 800.657 3864 • I-fY 651.282-5332 or 800-657.3864 • Available in alternative formats pe wq-strm2-12 • 4/13/09 & 8/16113 Page 1 of 7 www.pca.state.mn.us • 651.296.6300 • 800.657.3864 • TTY 651.282.5332 or 890.657.3864 • Available in alternative formats p wq-strm2- 12 • 4/13109 & 8116/13 Page 2 of 7 www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or WO-657.3864 • Available in alternative formats p wq-strm2- 12 • 4113/09 & 8116113 Page 3 of 7 www, ce.state.mn,us • 651-296.63x10 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657.3864 • Available in alternative formats p wq-strm2-12 • 4/13/09 & 8/16113 Pogo 4 of 7LLI ft vil.S03 " ,_ y1Jjte_CiviiSiteR[-1. V Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to Stormwater, RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS. exm1t• N/ALLI ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE. 6. Describe Methods to be used to promote infiltration and sediment removal on the site prior to offsite discharge, unless 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials: Infeasible (e.g., direct stormwater flow to vegetated areas): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILZED. H U LLI 0 a ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE. 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, woad preservatJve, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn, R. ah, 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE 7. For drainage or diversion ditches, describe practices to stabilize the normal wetted perimeter within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to surface water. The Last 200 lineal feet must be stabilized within 24 hours after connecting to surface waters and construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased for all discharges to Special, Impaired or "work in water restrictions". Al! other remaining portions of the temporary or permanent ditches or swales within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water, property edge and construction in that area has Dewatering and Basin Draining IY•D 4 ) 1, Will the project include dewatering or basin draining? 0 Yes 141 No r h i ]f yes, describe measures to be used to treat/dispose of turbid or sediment laden Ovate and method to prevent erosion or discharge Part IV. D the LAWS. temporarily or permanently ceased. scour of points (see of permit): I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. N/A - NO DITCHES ON SITE 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn, R. ch. 7035: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 8, Describe additional erosion prevention measures that will be implemented at the site during construction (e.g., construction phasing, minimizing soil disturbance, vegetative buffers, horizontal sloe radia slope dra win Iterracin etc. P g, g P grading, P g g, ) 2. Will the project include use of filters for backwash water'? Q Yes 11 No p l OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE WHEN If yes, describe how filter backwash water will be managed on the site or properly disposed (see Part111.0.3. of the permit): 5, Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: POSSIBLE. SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS 9. If applicable, include additional requirements in Appendix A Part C.3 regarding maintaining a 100-foot buffer zone or installing NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER. redundant BMPs for portions of the site that drain to special waters). Additional BMPs for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands (Appendix A, Parts C and D) N/A 6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance:F EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT 10. If applicable, describe additional erosion prevention BMPs to be implemented at the site to protect planned infiltration areas waters?� 1. Special iNaters. Doesyour project discharge to special Yes h. No 1 R 2. If proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of the permanent Ma 'hew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREA, Stormwater management practices, then other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS, prior to discharge to surface waters. Describe what other treatment wilt be provided. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: Sediment Control NIA ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE, Practices (iV.C) 3. Describe erosion and sediment controls for exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope to a special waters, and DATE DESCRIPTION 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE. Describe the methods of sediment control BMPs to be implemented at this site during construction to minimize sediment impacts to surface waters, including curb and gutter systems temporary sediment basins for areas that drain five or more acres disturbed atone time. N/A 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 1. Describe Methods to be used for down gradient perimeter control: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. 4. Describe the undisturbed buffer zone to be used (not less than 100 linear feet from the special water), 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL Final Stabilization (IV.G) N/A • • 1. Describe method of final stabilization (permanent cover) of all disturbed areas: 2. Describe Methods to be used to contain soil stockpiles: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY. 5, Describe how the permanent Stormwater management system will ensure that the pre and post project runoff rate and volume from the 1, and 2-year 24-hour events remains the same. FINAL STABILIZATION WiLL BE ACOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 3. Describe Methods to be for drain inlet precipitation • • used storm protection:NIA 2. Describe procedures for completing final stabilization and terminating permit coverage (see Part IV.G.1-5): SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS. 6. Describe how the Stormwater management system will minimize any increase in the temperature of trout stream UPON FINAL STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER 4, Describe Methods to tracking permanent receiving waters resulting in the 1, and 2-year 24-hour precipitation events. THE NPOES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION minimize vehicle at construction exits and street sweeping activities: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. N/A . . PROCEDURE. 5. Describe Methods, If applicable, additional sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to be installed to keep runoff away from 7. Wetlands. Does your project discharge stormwater with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland (e.g., • • - - Documentation of infeasibility: (If Applicable) planned infiltration areas when excavated prior to final stabilization of the contributing drainage area: SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT INFILTRATION AREAS. conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond)? 0 Yes ►g No If Yes, describe the wetland mitigation sequence that will be followed in accordance with Part 0 of Appendix A. REVISION SUMMARY 6. Describe methods to be used to minimize soil compaction and top soil (unless infeasible) at this site: N/A DATE DESCRIPTION preserve LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED, . . • 7. Describe plans to preserve a 50-foot natural buffer between the project's soil disturbance and a surface water or plans for redundant sediment controls If a buffer is infeasible: DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 200 Inspections and Maintenance (IV.E) Describe procedures to routinely inspect the construction site: r Once every seven (7) days during active construction and, • • FEET OF WETLAND. • Within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 Inches in 24 hours, and within seven (7) days after that. PROJECT NO.: 17055 8. Describe plans for use of sedimentation treatment chemicals (e.g., polymers, flocculants, etc.) see Part [V.C.10 of the permit: N/A Inspections must include stabilized areas, erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, and infiltration areas. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS S 1 ■ 4 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST," 9. Is the project required to install a temporary sediment basin due to 10 or more acres draining to a common location or 5 acres or more if the site is within 1 mile of a special or impaired water? 0 Yes No If yes, describe (or attach plans ) showing how the basin will be designed and constructed in accordance with Part IILC of the Pollution Prevention Management Measures (IV.F) www,pca.state.mn,us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 • M 651-282.5332 ar 657- 864 • Avaitable in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4/13/09 & 8/16113 Page 7 of 7 www.pea,state.rmus • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-386-4 • TTY 651.282-5332 or 800-657.3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2.12 • 4113/09 & 8116113 Page 5 of 7 www,pcistate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657.3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-strm2-12 • 4/13109 8 8/16113 Page 6 of 7 ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM 9yiJEjite Minnesota Pollution Lontrol Agency 3}q nr11 St Ihrul.MN 55155 4144 ATTACHMENT B: Construction Stormwater Inspection Checklist Construction Stormwater Program r)rr- Tarp Permffon Note: This inspection report does not address all aspects of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDESISDS) Construction Stormwater permit (Permit) issued on August 1, 2013. The completion of this checklist does not guarantee that all permit requirements are in compliance; it is the responsibility of the Permittee(s) to read and understand the permit requirements. Facility Information Site name: Facility address: City: Inspection Information State: Permit number: Zip code: Inspector name: Date (mm/ddlyyyy): Phone number, Time: ❑ am ❑ pm Is the inspector certified in sediment and erosion control and itis documented in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Is this inspection routine or in response to a storm event: Rainfall amount (if applicable)• Is site within one aerial mile of special or impaired water? ❑ Yes 0 No Ifyes, follow Appendix A and other applicable permit requirements. Note: If NA is selected at any time, specify why in the com ment area for that section. Erosion Control Requirement (Part IV.B) www,pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Available In alternative formats wq-strm2.36 • 314114 Page for4 viSSito R 0 LI P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? Yes No NA 1. Soil stabilization where no construction activity for 14 days? (7 days were applicable) ■ ■ ■ ■ 2. Has the need to disturb steep slopes been minimized? 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? 0 ■ ■ ■ 3. All ditches stabilized 200' back from point of discharge within 24 hours? (Not mulch) ■ 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? 0 ■ ■ ■ 4. Are there erosion BIM's for onsite stockpiles? If No. have redundant sediment controls been installed? ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 5. Are appropriate BM P's installed protecting inlets/outlets? ■ ■ ■ www,pca.srate.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Available In alternative formats wq-strm2.36 • 314114 Page for4 viSSito R 0 LI P 2. Has access been restricted to onsite hazardous materials? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. Does on-site fueling orily occur in a contained area? ■ ❑ ■ ■ 4_ Are all solid wastes being properly disposed of? 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? 0 ❑ ■ ■ 5. Is the concrete washout area completely contained? ■ 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? 0 ■ ■ 6. Is the concrete washout area marked with a sign? ■ If No. have redundant sediment controls been installed? ■ ■ ■ Comments: 7. Were any discharges seen during this inspection, sediment, water, or otherwise? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, state the exact location of all points of discharge. Photograph the discharge and describe the discharge (color, odor, foam, oil sheen, etc). Horn will it be removed? How did the discharge happen? How much was discharged? How will it be stopped, and how long will it take to stop? Is the discharge going into an adjacent site? Was the discharge a sedment delta? If yes, will the delta be recovered within 7 days? 8. Wil a permanent stormwater management system be utilized in this project as required and in accordance with Part III,D of the permit? Describe: 9. Is any dewatering occurring on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, where? What BMP is being used? How much water is being dewatered? Is the water clear? I/Vnere is the water being discharged to? 10. Is a copy of the SWPPP located on the construction site? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Has the SWPPP been followed and implemented on site? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12. Is a sedimentation basin required for this project as specified in the permit? ❑ Yes D No Ifyes, are they maintained as specified in the permit? 0 Yes 0 No 13. Is the topsoil on this project being preserved? ❑ Yes ❑ No Ifyes, explain how the topsoil is being preserved. If not, explain why it was infeasible. 14 Are all infiltration systems marked to avoid compaction? 0 Yes 0 No Do all Infiltration areas have pretreatment devices? ❑ Yes 0 No www,pca.state.mn.us • 651-296.6300 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651.282.5332 or 800657.3864 • Available to alternative formats wq-strm2.36 • 314114 Page 3 of 4 tyijSite 6. Do pipe outlets have energy dissipation? Comments: Sediment Control Requirement (Part IV.C.) Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control I3MPs (Part IV.E.) Yes No NA 1. Perimeter control installed on all down gradient perimeters? ■ 0 ■ ■ ■ 2. Perimeter control trenched in where appropriate? 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 3. 50 Foot -natural buffer maintained around all surface waters? 4. Are inlet protection devices maintained and functioning properly? 0 ■ ■ If No. have redundant sediment controls been installed? 0 ■ ■ 4. Inlet protection on all catch basins and culvert inlets? 0 ■ ■ 5. Vehicle tracking Best Management Practices (BMPs) at all site exits? 6. All tracked sedment removed within 24 hours? 0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ 7. Are all infiltration systems staked and marked to avoid compaction? 0 ■ ■ 8. Are all infiltration areas protected with a pretreatment device? 0 ■ ■ 9_ Do all stockpiles have perimeter control? ■ ■ ■ Comments: Maintenance -Erosion and Sediment Control I3MPs (Part IV.E.) Comments: Other Yes 1 No NA 1_ Are all materials that can leach pollutants under cover? www,pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800.657-3864 wq-strm2.36 • 314114 ❑ 1 ❑ TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Available to alternative formats Page 2of4 . vi.S1t� R Ei Li 15. Description of areas of non-compliance noted during the inspection, required corrective actions, and recommended date of completion of corrective actions: 16. Proposed amendments to the SWPPP' 17. Potential areas of fixture concern, 18. Additional comments: Disclosures: • After dscovery, the permit requires many of the deficiencies that may be found in this checklist be corrected within a specified period of time. See permit for more details. • This inspection checklist is an option for small construction sites. Large construction sites and linear projects require more extensive/more location specific inspection requirements_ • The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for the inspection and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BFA P's as well as erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part 11 .13_5.. or the project has undergone Final Stabilization and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the M PCA. www,pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available to alternative formats wq-strm2.36 • 314114 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM vi. Site G R f7 lJ P ATTACHMENT C STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1 . All stormwater retention, detention and treatment hasins must he inspected at least. once a year Lo deter Mine that basin relenlion and treatment characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by ')O percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a stormwater basin requires sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours and vegetated state within one year of the inspection date. 2. All outlet structures, culverts, outlall structures and other stormwater facilities for which maintenance requirements are not otherwise specified herein must be inspected in the spring, summer and fall of each year. Within 30 days of the inspection date, all accumulated sediment and debris must be removed such that each stormwater facility operates as designed and permitted. Contributing drainage areas must he kept clear of litter and ve.getnrive debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways I.ept clear, Inlet areas kepi- clean, epiclear!, and undesirable vegetation ierrloved. Erosion impairing the function or integrity of the facilities, if any, t<vill be corrected, and any structural damage impairing or threatening to impair the function of the facilities must be repaired. 3. Volume control facilities and contributing drainage areas must be inspected every three months during the operational period (between spring snowmelt and first substantial snowfall) and monitored after rainfall events of 1 inch or more to ensure that the contributing drainage arca is clear of litter and debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways are clear, inlet areas are clear!, undesirable vegetation is removed and there is no erosion impairing or threatening to impair the function of a facility. If sediment has accumulated in a infiltration feature, within 30 days of inspection deposited sediments Must be removed, the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils must be restored, and any surface disturbance must he stabilized. Inspection must ensure that sediment taps and forehays are Tapping sediment and that more than 50 perrcnt ofthe storage. volume remains, the contributing drainage area is stahlr ivi axile G R U P (i.e., no erosion is observed), and inlets and outletioverflow spillways are in good conditions with no erosion. Maintenance techniques used must protect the infiltration capacity of the practice by limiting soil compaction to the greatest extent possible (e.g., by using low -impact earth -moving equipment). 2 e L2 O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Pr ir 11, AL H 0 w O a 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 N H U W H 2 U ce z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. Yes No NA 1_ Are all previously stabilized areas maintaining 90% ground cover? ■ 0 ■ 2. Any ditch erosion observed? 0 ■ ■ 3. Perimeter Control -Has sedment reached one half the height ofthe device? ❑ ❑ 0 4. Are inlet protection devices maintained and functioning properly? ❑ ■ ■ Comments: Other Yes 1 No NA 1_ Are all materials that can leach pollutants under cover? www,pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800.657-3864 wq-strm2.36 • 314114 ❑ 1 ❑ TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 Available to alternative formats Page 2of4 . vi.S1t� R Ei Li 15. Description of areas of non-compliance noted during the inspection, required corrective actions, and recommended date of completion of corrective actions: 16. Proposed amendments to the SWPPP' 17. Potential areas of fixture concern, 18. Additional comments: Disclosures: • After dscovery, the permit requires many of the deficiencies that may be found in this checklist be corrected within a specified period of time. See permit for more details. • This inspection checklist is an option for small construction sites. Large construction sites and linear projects require more extensive/more location specific inspection requirements_ • The Permittee(s) is/are responsible for the inspection and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BFA P's as well as erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs until another Permittee has obtained coverage under this Permit according to Part 11 .13_5.. or the project has undergone Final Stabilization and a Notice of Termination has been submitted to the M PCA. www,pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800.657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available to alternative formats wq-strm2.36 • 314114 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM vi. Site G R f7 lJ P ATTACHMENT C STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1 . All stormwater retention, detention and treatment hasins must he inspected at least. once a year Lo deter Mine that basin relenlion and treatment characteristics are adequate. A storage treatment basin will be considered inadequate if sediment has decreased the wet storage volume by ')O percent or dry storage volume by 25 percent of its original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a stormwater basin requires sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours and vegetated state within one year of the inspection date. 2. All outlet structures, culverts, outlall structures and other stormwater facilities for which maintenance requirements are not otherwise specified herein must be inspected in the spring, summer and fall of each year. Within 30 days of the inspection date, all accumulated sediment and debris must be removed such that each stormwater facility operates as designed and permitted. Contributing drainage areas must he kept clear of litter and ve.getnrive debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways I.ept clear, Inlet areas kepi- clean, epiclear!, and undesirable vegetation ierrloved. Erosion impairing the function or integrity of the facilities, if any, t<vill be corrected, and any structural damage impairing or threatening to impair the function of the facilities must be repaired. 3. Volume control facilities and contributing drainage areas must be inspected every three months during the operational period (between spring snowmelt and first substantial snowfall) and monitored after rainfall events of 1 inch or more to ensure that the contributing drainage arca is clear of litter and debris, inflow pipes and overflow spillways are clear, inlet areas are clear!, undesirable vegetation is removed and there is no erosion impairing or threatening to impair the function of a facility. If sediment has accumulated in a infiltration feature, within 30 days of inspection deposited sediments Must be removed, the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils must be restored, and any surface disturbance must he stabilized. Inspection must ensure that sediment taps and forehays are Tapping sediment and that more than 50 perrcnt ofthe storage. volume remains, the contributing drainage area is stahlr ivi axile G R U P (i.e., no erosion is observed), and inlets and outletioverflow spillways are in good conditions with no erosion. Maintenance techniques used must protect the infiltration capacity of the practice by limiting soil compaction to the greatest extent possible (e.g., by using low -impact earth -moving equipment). 2 e L2 O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Pr ir 11, AL H 0 w O a 114 BRICK ST, STILLWATER, MN 55082 N H U W H 2 U ce z 0 J 1301 AMERICAN BLVD EAST, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Ma thew R. Pavek DATE 10/27/17 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 06/16/17 CONCEPT PUD SUBMITTAL 09/15/17 CITY SUBMITTAL 10/27/17 CITY RESUBMITTAL REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: 17055 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 ©COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. May 11,2017 Mme■ ,1i'I71 Ms. Anne Stanfield Ecumen Development 3530 Lexington Avenue North Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report Addendum #1 Proposed Senior Living 114 South Brick Street Stillwater, Minnesota Intertek-PSI Project No.: 0678112-A1 Dear Ms. Stanfield: Professional Service Industries, Inc. (Intertek-PSI) is pleased to transmit this supplemental Geotechnical Engineering Services Report for the proposed Stillwater Senior Living project located at 114 South Brick Street in Stillwater, Minnesota. Intertek-PSI completed a Geotechnical Exploration for this project, the results of which are contained in Intertek-PSI Report No. 0678112 dated March 3, 2017. This Addendum report includes the results of three (3) supplemental test pits completed to further evaluate the extent of the undocumented fill noted in the original geotechnical report near Boring B-1. Project Background The proposed building will consist of a senior living facility with an approximate footprint of 20,000 square feet. The building will have one below -grade level for parking and three levels above -grade. Intertek-PSI understands that building construction will likely consist of either concrete masonry unit (CMU) or cast -in-place concrete foundation walls and precast concrete columns below -grade supporting precast concrete plank for the first floor. The above -grade construction will consist of wood framing. Based upon this, Intertek-PSI's analysis is based on maximum wall loads for being on the order of 4 kips per lineal foot and column loads being less than 250 kips. Finished first floor elevation for the new building is anticipated to be at approximately 879± feet above mean sea level. The finished floor elevation of the lower below grade level will be at approximately 867± feet MSL. The site is gently sloping in the proposed building area, with steeper downward slopes beyond. Elevation differences across the site vary by about 35± feet, however; within the proposed building footprint, there is approximately 13± feet of elevation difference (elevation 876± to 893± feet MSL). Intertek-PSI • 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 • Eagan, Minnesota 55121 • 651-646-8148 • Fax 651-646-8258 • www.psiusa.com Proposed Senior Living — Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project 0678112-A1 Page 2 of 4 The results of the original test borings indicate the approximate northern half of the west building wing was underlain by a deposit of undocumented fill. This deposit of undocumented fill consisted of a mixture of clayey sand, buried topsoil, sandy silt, roots, organics, and wood pieces. The fill extended to a depth of 25± feet below existing site grade at Boring B-1. (elevation 856± feet MSL). The existing fill is not suitable for the support of foundations or foundation supporting fill due to the potential of experiencing greater than tolerable levels of total and differential type settlements. The fill also poses an increased risk of experiencing settlement of the building floor slab as the existing fill consolidates and/or settles along the previous slope. Based upon this PSI recommended an initial soil correction to include that complete removal of the existing fill from within and a minimum 10 feet beyond the proposed building footprint. The resulting excavation could then be backfilled to proposed bearing elevation with a compacted engineered fill. Based upon a finished lower level floor elevation of 867± feet MSL, it is anticipated that exterior foundations would bear at an approximate elevation of 865± feet MSL. A soil correction scheme as outlined above would require excavations to at least 9 feet below anticipated bearing elevation to remove the existing fill. Test Pit Discussion The purpose of these supplemental test pits was to further evaluate the extent of the unsuitable fill within the west wing of the proposed building. Three (3) test pits were performed within the northern portion of the west wing near Boring B-1. Test Pit TP -1 was located adjacent to Boring B-1, with TP -2 located 50 feet south and TP -3 100 feet south of TP -1, respectively. Because no fill was observed at TP -2, TP -3 was relocated in the field to 25 feet south of TP -1, as authorized by Ms. Anne Stanfield of Ecumen Development. The locations of the test pits are noted on the updated Boring Location Plan in the appendix of this Addendum. The depths of the test pits were determined in the field based on changes in soil strata, commensurate with the observations in the original geotechnical report. Logs of the soils noted in each test pit are included in the appendix of this addendum. In general, the soils observed in the test pits were similar with those noted in the borings of the original report. The general profile of the test pits included surficial vegetation with approximately six inches of surficial organic soils, underlain by undocumented fill at test pit locations TP -1 and TP -3. The fill consisted of a mixture of clayey sand with traces of roots organics, gravel, cobbles, and wood chips, and ranged from reddish brown to gray to black in color. Two layers consisting predominately of wood chips were observed in TP -1; one between depths of 19± to 22± feet and another between depths of 24± to 25± feet. The fill was observed to depths of 25± feet in TP -1; not observed in TP -2; and to a depth of 11± feet in TP -3. Each test pit location was terminated in native clayey sand soils at depths of 12± to 26± feet below existing site grades. Proposed Senior Living — Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project 0678112-A1 Page 3 of 4 Geotechnical Discussion The results of the test pits confirmed that a rather deep deposit of undocumented fill is located below the northern portion of the west wing of the proposed building. This fill is not suitable for the support of the building foundations or floor slab due to the potential of experiencing greater than tolerable levels of settlement. Prior to placement of the fill, a rather steep slope likely existed within this portion of the building. It is likely that the fill was loose dumped along the slope during filling. As such, it is likely that the fill mass will continue to consolidate and settle along the previous slope. Based upon this, PSI recommends that the existing fills be completely removed from within and a minimum of 10 feet beyond the proposed building footprint and replaced with compacted engineered fill during initial site grading activities. The building foundations and floor slab within this portion of the building could then be designed to bear on the compacted engineered fill. Foundations must bear upon suitable bearing native soils or newly compacted engineered fill placed over suitable bearing native soils that have been observed and tested by a qualified geotechnical engineering technician. PSI recommends that footings bearing on native soils or newly placed engineered fill be designed for the maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures noted in the table below based on dead load plus design live load, as noted in the original geotechnical report. Minimum dimensions of 18 inches for continuous footings and 30 inches for column footings should be used in foundation design to minimize the possibility of a local bearing capacity failure, even if the allowable bearing pressure recommended herein is not fully utilized. FOUNDATION TYPE MINIMUM DEPTH BELOW ADJACENT GRADES (IN) MAXIMUM NET ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE (PSF) Interior Isolated Column Foundations 24 4,500 Exterior Isolated Column Foundations 42 4,000 All Continuous Foundations 42 4,000 As an alternative, if site conditions allow, consideration could be given to shifting (relocating) the building approximately 50± feet to the south (approximate location of test pit TP -3). This would minimize the anticipated volume and associated cost for the soil correction. Suitable bearing natural clayey sand soils are anticipated to be present at the proposed lower level elevation of 867± feet to the south of TP -3. Another alternative would include supporting the northern portion of the building on intermediate foundations, such as helical piers, that would penetrate the existing undocumented fill and bear in the suitable clayey sands below. If this alternative is considered, Intertek-PSI should be contacted for additional recommendations. Proposed Senior Living — Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project 0678112-A1 Page 4 of 4 This addendum does not replace or amend any recommendations of the original Geotechnical Exploration Report from Professional Service Industries, Report number 0678112, dated March 3, 2017. The recommendations of the aforementioned report, including but not limited to: subsurface conditions, geotechnical evaluations, site preparation, construction considerations, geotechnical risk, and report limitations are in full effect with the additional information of this addendum. The recommendations contained in this addendum are under the same conditions, terms, and authorization as the original proposal, signed February 8, 2017, by Ms. Anne Stanfield of Ecumen Development. Any uses of the information included in this addendum beyond the stated scope and purpose are not endorsed by Professional Service Industries. Intertek-PSI appreciates the opportunity to perform this supplemental Geotechnical Exploration and looks forward to continuing our participation during the design and construction phases of this project. If you have questions pertaining to this report, or if Intertek-PSI may be of further service, please contact us at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 940tfo"rtv-it Joseph M. Rozmiarek, P.E. David M. Barndt Geotechnical Department Manager Senior Vice President APPENDIX SITE VICINITY PLAN BORING AND TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN TEST PIT LOGS Intertek March 3, 2017 INN rei7"f Ms. Anne Stanfield Ecumen Development 3530 Lexington Avenue North Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed Stillwater Senior Living 114 Brick Street South Stillwater, Minnesota Intertek-PSI Report No. 0678112 Dear Ms. Stanfield: Professional Service Industries, Inc. (Intertek-PSI) is pleased to transmit our Geotechnical Engineering Services Report for the proposed Stillwater Senior Living facility in Stillwater, Minnesota. This report includes the results of field and laboratory testing, and recommendations for foundations, slabs -on -grade, pavements, stormwater management features, and general site development considerations. Intertek-PSI appreciates the opportunity to perform this Geotechnical Exploration and looks forward to continuing our participation during the design and construction phases of this project. If you have questions pertaining to this report, or if Intertek-PSI may be of further service, please contact us at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 9atfAl "rAmt Joseph M. Rozmiarek, P.E. Department Manager Geotechnical Services David M. Barndt Principal Consultant Senior Vice President Intertek-PSI • 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 • Eagan, Minnesota 55121 • 651-646-8148 • Fax 651-646-8258 • www.psiusa.com GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT For the Proposed Stillwater Senior Living 114 Brick Street South Stillwater, Minnesota Prepared for: Ecumen Development 3530 Lexington Avenue North Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 Prepared by: Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Phone (651) 646-8148 Fax (651) 646-8258 Intertek-PSI Report Number: 0678112 March 3, 2017 Intertek .7/112#2v? -----J-4 - 1'' David M. Barndt Principal Consultant I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name Joseph M. Rozmiarek, P.E. Signature: r ' Exp. Date: 6/30/18 License # 52629 by 5i�lf1Jrf+Cf �1' •ii5�.��y���% ti wy a. LICENSED' j PROFESSIONAL _ --a t ENGINEER: k 52529 1r er4 Mitt ;!4 The above Profeselonen aIt}?a eng Seal and Si ature an electranic rpaoducaun of the original seal and stenatme. orignal hard cony WM seat to the client listed on this document This electronic repro dict Axil nut be ns mM as an orieinal OF cerbEed document. Stillwater Senior Living Stillwater MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. PROJECT INFORMATION 2 Project Authorization 2 Project Description 2 Purpose and Scope of Services 4 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 Site Location and Description 4 Subsurface Conditions 5 Groundwater Information 7 EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 Geotechnical Discussion 8 Site Preparation 9 Foundation Recommendations 11 Floor Slab Recommendations 13 Below Grade Wall Design Considerations 14 Seismic Site Class 16 Pavement Recommendations 16 Infiltration Characteristics of Subsurface Soils and Pond Recommendations 18 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 20 Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns 20 Drainage and Groundwater Concerns 20 Excavations 21 Utilities Trenching 21 GEOTECHNICAL RISK 22 REPORT LIMITATIONS 22 APPENDIX SITE VICINITY PLAN BORING LOCATION PLAN LOG OF BORINGS USGS SEISMIC ANALYSIS GENERAL NOTES 1 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Authorization The following Table summarizes, in chronological order, the Project Authorization History for the services performed and represented in this report by Professional Service Industries, Inc. (Intertek-PSI). DOCUMENT AND REFERENCE NUMBER DATE AUTHOR OR AGENT & COMPANY Email Request for Proposal- Geotechnical 2/3/2017 Ms. Beth Koeppel, Kaas-Wilson Architects Intertek-PSI Proposal 0675-201130 2/6/2017 Mr. Joseph Rozmiarek and Mr. John Gordon, Intertek-PSI Request for Revised Proposal — Revised Client Information 2/8/2017 Ms. Beth Koeppel, Kaas-Wilson Architects Intertek-PSI Proposal 0675-201130-R1 2/8/2017 Mr. Joseph Rozmiarek and Mr. John Gordon, Intertek-PSI Notice to Proceed: 2/8/2017 Ms. Anne Stanfield. Ecumen Development Project Description lntertek-PSI understands the project will include construction of a new free standing building at 114 Brick Street South in Stillwater, Minnesota. The following Table lists the material and information provided for this project: DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL PROVIDER/SOURCE DATE Boring Location Plan Ms. Beth Koeppel Kaas-Wilson Architects Undated Site Topographic Survey Ms. Beth Koeppel Kaas-Wilson Architects 5/24/2002 The new building will consist of a senior living facility with an approximate footprint of 20,000 square feet. The building will have one below -grade level for parking and three levels above -grade. Specific building design details have not been provided to Intertek- PSI at this time. However, Intertek-PSI understands that building construction will likely consist of either concrete masonry unit (CMU) or cast -in-place concrete foundation walls and precast concrete columns below -grade supporting precast concrete plank for the first floor. The above -grade construction will consist of wood framing. Based upon this, Intertek-PSI's analysis is based on maximum wall loads for being on the order of 4 kips per lineal foot and column loads being less than 250 kips. The address for the project is 114 Brick Street South. The building will be bounded by undeveloped land and Myrtle Street to the north; an existing church and associated pavements to the south; existing residential properties to the west; and Brick Street South 2 Stillwater Senior Living Stillwater MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 to the east with residential properties beyond. The majority of the site is undeveloped, but an AM radio tower exists on the east -center portion of the site. The radio tower grounding system and anchoring system exists below grade on site. Finished first floor elevation for the new building has not been finalized, but is anticipated to be at approximately 879± feet above mean sea level. The finished floor elevation of the below grade level will be at approximately 867± feet MSL. The site is gently sloping in the proposed building area, with steeper downward slopes beyond. Elevation differences between the building borings are on the order of 13± feet (876± to 893± feet MSL) and elevation differences of up to 35± feet across the site, based on the provided site plan. Based on this, cuts of up to 26± feet for the lower level and nominal fills on the order of 2± feet will be required to achieve design site grades. The project will also include construction of pavements and drive lanes to the south and east of the facility. A grading plan has not been provided, however, the planned pavements are anticipated to be at or near existing side grades, with nominal cuts and fills of 2± feet required to achieve design site grades. The project will also include construction of two stormwater management areas, with one along the north side of the property and one along the east side of the property. The stormwater features have preliminarily been designed as infiltration features. A grading plan has not been provided, however, the planned bottom elevations are anticipated to be approximately 5± feet below existing side grades. Additional site work includes surface plazas, landscaping, and site utilities. The following Table lists the structural loads and site features that are required for or are the design basis for the conclusions contained in this report: STRUCTURAL LOAD/PROPERTY REQUIREMENT/DESIGN BASIS BUILDING Maximum Wall Loads 4 kips per lineal foot (klf) B Maximum Column Loads 250 kips B Finished Floor Elevation First Floor - 879± feet MSL Lower Level - 867± feet MSL R Maximum Floor Loads and Size 125 pounds per square foot (psf)/ Concentrated loads under 2 square feet B Settlement Tolerances 1 -inch total; %-inch differential between adjacent columns B PAVEMENTS Pavement 18 -kip ESAL (cycle & duration) Light Duty — 30,000 ESAL; Heavy Duty— 60,000 ESAL; with a life expectancy of 20 years B STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater Feature Locations Two infiltration -type or detention -type features along north and east sides of site B 3 Stillwater Senior Living Stillwater MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 GRADING Planned Grade Variations in Building Pad Areas Up to 26± feet of cut 2± feet of fill B B = Report has been prepared based on this parameter or loading in the absence of client supplied information at the time of this report. R = Information provided by Kaas Wilson Architects. The geotechnical recommendations presented in this report are based on the available project information, building location, and the subsurface materials described in this report. If the noted information is incorrect, please inform Intertek-PSI in writing so that we may amend the recommendations presented in this report if appropriate and if desired by the client. lntertek-PSI will not be responsible for the implementation of its recommendations when it is not notified of changes in the project. Purpose and Scope of Services The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and develop geotechnical design criteria regarding foundations, floor slabs, pavements, and stormwater management areas for the proposed project. Subgrade preparation recommendations and construction considerations are also provided. Intertek-PSI's scope of services included drilling a total of 12 soil test borings, select laboratory testing, and preparation of this Geotechnical Report. The scope of services for the geotechnical investigation did not include an environmental assessment for determining the presence or absence of wetlands, or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, bedrock, surface water, groundwater, or air on or below, or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors, and unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for informational purposes. Intertek-PSI is completing an Environmental Phase I Assessment under report number 0673839. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Site Location and Description The address for the project is 114 Brick Street South. The building will be bounded by undeveloped land and Myrtle Street to the north; an existing church and associated pavements to the south; existing residential properties to the west; and Brick Street South to the east with residential properties beyond. An existing radio tower is present on the eastern portion of the site. This tower as well as the guy anchors and associated utilities lies within the footprint of the proposed building. The site is relatively flat but slopes down steeply to the north, east and west, with elevation differences on the site on the order of 35± feet. Within the proposed building area, however, the elevation difference is on the order of 20± feet. The western section of the property appears to have been graded to the current site elevations. The site does not appear to have been developed previously otherwise, based on a review of historical 4 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 aerial photographs dating to 1938 on the Minnesota Historical Aerial Photographs online server. The site Latitude and Longitude is approximately 45.0544°N and 92.8287°W, respectively. Subsurface Conditions The subsurface conditions were explored with 12 soil test borings. The following table depicts the general location and surface of elevation of the borings: BORING GENERAL LOCATION SURFACE ELEVATION (FT MSL) DEPTH OF BORING (FT) B-01 Proposed Building, West Wing, North End 882 31* B-02 Proposed North Pond, West End 882 16 B-03 Proposed North Pond, East End 881 16 B-04 Proposed Building, West Wing, Center 883 26 B-05 Proposed Building, East Wing, West End 893 36 B-06 Proposed Building, East Wing, Center 891 31 B-07 Proposed Building, East Wing, Southeast End 884 21 B-08 Proposed East Pond, Center 876 16 B-09 Proposed Pavements, Northwest Section 882 11 B-10 Proposed Building, West Wing, South End 880 26 B-11 Proposed Pavements, Southwest Section 880 11 B-12 Proposed Pavements, East Section 881 26 *Boring extended in the field due to encountered deep undocumented fill soils. The locations of the borings are shown on the Boring Location Plan in the Appendix. The boring locations were selected by Kaas Wilson Architects. The surface elevation at each boring location was determined by the drilling crew using conventional leveling techniques. The floor slab at the north -facing entrance to the Our Savior Lutheran Church to the south of the site was used as a benchmark. This benchmark has a reported elevation of 877.32 feet above mean sea level according to the provided site survey from 2002. This location is noted as "BM" on the attached boring location plan. Elevations should be considered accurate to the nearest 1± foot. 5 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 The borings were advanced utilizing hollow stem auger drilling methods and soil samples were routinely obtained during the drilling process. Drilling and sampling techniques were accomplished generally in accordance with ASTM procedures. Representative soil samples were obtained from the soil borings and were returned to Intertek-PSI's laboratory where they were visually classified using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) as a guideline. Further, Intertek-PSI conducted limited laboratory testing on select soil samples to aid in identifying and describing the physical characteristics of the soils and to aid in defining the site soil stratigraphy. The results of the field exploration and laboratory tests were used in Intertek-PSI's engineering analysis and in the formulation of our engineering recommendations. The subsurface conditions included surficial organic soils (3± to 12± inches thick) at Borings B-03 through B-09, B-11 and B-12 or undocumented fill to depths of 10± to 25± feet below existing site grades at Borings B-01 and B-02. Bituminous pavements (3 inches thick) over aggregate base (9 inches thick) was encountered at Boring B-10. The surficial organic soils generally consisted of sand silt with traces of clay, roots, and organics. Moisture contents in the surficial organic soils ranged from 10% to 44%. Some of the surficial moisture contents may have been affected by recent snowmelt and precipitation events. SPT N -values were generally not completed in the surficial soils due to frozen soils at the time drilling. Underlying the surficial organic soils at Borings B-06, B-08, B-09, and B-11 was a deposit of sandy silt to depths of 5± feet below existing site grades, except in Boring B-11, where the silt was encountered to the termination depth of 11 feet. The sandy silt was moist to wet, with moisture contents ranging from 8% to 30%. SPT N -values in the sandy silt ranged from 6 to 12 blows per foot (bpf), indicating loose to medium relative densities. These silt soils were also encountered on a limited basis at deeper elevations through the soil profile. Underlying the surficial organic soils at Borings B-03 through B-05, B-07, B-10, and B-11 and underlying the sandy silt at Borings B-06, B-08, B-09, and B-11 was a deposit of clayey sand to the termination depths of the borings. Some of the clayey sand soils contained traces of gravel. The clayey sand soils ranged from moist to wet, with moisture contents ranging from 5% to 22%. SPT N -values in the clayey sand soils ranged from 3 to 45 bpf, indicating very loose to dense relative densities, but more typically ranged from 11 to 22 bpf, indicating medium relative densities. An exception to this general soil profile was a deposit of undocumented fill to a depth of 25± feet below existing site grades in Boring B-01 and to a depth of 15± feet in Boring B- 02. This deposit of undocumented fill consisted of a mixture of clayey sand, buried topsoil, sandy silt, roots, organics, and wood pieces. The fill was generally in a moist condition, with moisture contents ranging from 8% to 18%. SPT N -values in the fill ranged from 11 to 16 bpf. Although this exploration was completed for geotechnical purposes, it should be noted that soils at the bottom of the undocumented fill strata and the underlying native clayey sand soils contained a chemical -type odor. The source of the odor and the contaminant type are not known to Intertek-PSI at this time. 6 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 The soils observed on site are consistent with the mapped NRCS soil profile for the region. At the proposed site location, the soils are expected to consist of Kingsley Sandy Loam soils. These deposits consist predominantly of sand -size particles, with appreciable amounts of silt and clay. These soils are considered somewhat limited for supporting shallow foundations for residential buildings and poor materials for construction reclamation. The above subsurface description is of a generalized nature to highlight the major subsurface stratification features and material characteristics. The boring logs included in the appendix should be reviewed for specific information at individual boring locations. These records include soil descriptions, stratifications, penetration resistances, locations of the samples, and laboratory test data. The stratifications shown on the boring logs represent the conditions only at the actual boring locations. Variations may occur and should be expected between boring locations. The stratifications represent the approximate boundary between subsurface materials and the actual transition may be gradual. Water level information obtained during field operations is also shown on these boring logs. The samples that were not discarded during classification or altered by laboratory testing will be retained for 60 days from the date of this report and then will be discarded. Groundwater Information Groundwater was observed on a limited basis during drilling operations at depths of 5± to 29± feet below existing site grades, corresponding to elevations of 853± to 878± feet MSL. Due to the variance and limited quantities of groundwater observed during drilling, these observations are likely to be perched in sandier soils above less permeable clayey sand soils. Groundwater was observed at the completion of drilling operations at depths of 22± to 29± feet in Borings B-01 and B-12, corresponding to elevations of 853± to 859± feet MSL. These groundwater levels are estimated to be more indicative of the static groundwater level on the site. Groundwater was not observed in the remaining borings at the completion of drilling operations. Nearby surface water features include McKusick Lake, located one half -mile north of the site, and Lily Lake, located one-third mile south of the site. The normal surface water elevation in the lakes are 854± and 848± feet, respectively, approximately 25± to 30± feet below existing site grades on site according to publicly available topographic maps. This is generally consistent with the groundwater elevations observed on site. The groundwater observations noted on the boring logs represent the groundwater conditions at the test boring locations at the time of drilling operations. It should be expected that the groundwater levels will fluctuate at least several feet seasonally and depending on climatic conditions and precipitation. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuation should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. 7 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Geotechnical Discussion There are two (2) geotechnical related issues at this site which will affect the design, construction and possible performance of the proposed building and site construction. The following summarizes these issues: 1. Undocumented fill, some of which contains organics, exists under the proposed building to depths of 25± feet at Boring B-01. Shallower fills on the order of 15± feet were observed in Boring B-02 in the proposed stormwater management feature. Additional undocumented fill should be anticipated during demolition of the existing tower and near the existing site utilities. A deposit of undocumented fill was encountered within the building at Boring B-01 extending to depths of 25± feet below existing site grades (elevation 856± feet MSL). A deposit of undocumented fill was observed to a depth of 15± feet in Boring B-02. The depth and consistency of the fill soils should be anticipated to vary between boring locations, and deeper localized deposits of undocumented fill may be encountered during construction. Additional undocumented fill should be anticipated during the demolition of the existing radio tower foundation and guy anchors and near the associated utilities. Most of the undocumented fill related to the radio tower on site is estimated to be removed during mass excavation of the below -grade level, however, the fill in the area of Boring B-1 extends to greater depths and a soil correction will be required in this area. In addition, some additional localized soil corrections to remove fill should be anticipated in other portions of the site. The existing undocumented fill is not suitable for support of foundations or foundation supporting fill. Based on the anticipated lower level finished floor elevation of 867± feet, the foundations should extend through most of the fill soils except at Boring B-01. Intertek-PSI recommends that the fill be removed in its entirety from within building pad and a distance of at least 10 feet beyond as part of initial mass grading activities. The fill at Boring B-01 extends to depths of 25± feet and contained deleterious materials, including organics, roots, and wood. Due to the observed deleterious materials present in the fill at Boring B-01, the fill soils will not be suitable for the support of foundations, foundation -supporting engineered fill or the lower level slab. These soils should be removed entirely from below the building footprint and outside of the building for a minimum distance of 10 feet, or the depth of the fill removal below foundation elevation, whichever is greater. Full fill removal from the pavement and stormwater management areas may not be required. The fill that does not contain organics and roots and that passes proofroll observations as noted in the Site Preparation section of this report may remain in place under the pavements. A portion of the fill is anticipated to be removed as part of mass grading for the stormwater management areas, but may remain in place under the installed pond liner. Undocumented fill that does not contain roots, organics, or other 8 Stillwater Senior Living Stillwater MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 unsuitable material may be moisture -conditioned and reused as a source of engineered fill. Fill soils containing organics should be used in landscape areas or disposed of offsite. The exposed surface of the site after fill removal should be prepared as outlined in the Site Preparation Section of this report. The adherence to the initial site preparation recommendations is considered critical to verify a suitable subgrade exists, prior to the placement of new fills required to obtain project grades. During earthwork operations, a representative of the geotechnical engineer should be present on-site on a full time basis to verify the subgrade conditions and placement and compaction of new fills. 2. Soils at the estimated bottom of pond elevation will have limited infiltration capacity due to the presence of clayey sand and sandy silt soils. The second geotechnical issue is the potential limitations of using infiltration as a means of stormwater management. The soils at estimated bottom of pond elevations consist of clayey sand and sandy silt and sandy clay fill, which will have a limited infiltration capacity, based on published infiltration rates by soil type. In addition, due to the variability of the fill at Boring B-2, the infiltration characteristics are likely to vary both laterally and vertically within the fill deposit. To provide suitable infiltration, the existing fills at Boring B-2 would need to be removed and replaced with a suitable granular fill. As an alternative to infiltration, below -grade detention systems under the pavements or at -grade detention ponds could be considered given the limited infiltration rates of the on-site soils. The existing fill soils may remain in place under an installed detention pond liner. The following geotechnical related recommendations have been developed on the basis of the subsurface conditions encountered and Intertek-PSI's understanding of the proposed development. Intertek-PSI has presented these recommendations with the understanding that the owner will remove all existing undocumented fill from the building pad as recommended in this report. Should changes in the project criteria occur, a review must be made by Intertek-PSI to determine if modifications to our recommendations will be required. Site Preparation Prior to the placement of new fill or preparation of the construction area subgrade, Intertek- PSI recommends that the existing surficial organic soils, trees including root bulbs, frozen soils (if present during construction), and undocumented fill be removed from within and a minimum of 10 feet beyond the proposed building and pavement areas. The resulting excavations should then be backfilled with compacted engineered fill as outlined below. Special care should be given during removal and replacement of the deeper undocumented fill deposits near Boring B-01. Due to the depth the fill, the soil correction will extend below foundation depths, and foundations in this area will be bearing in newly placed engineered fill. Therefore, the fill removal and replacement will be critical to provide adequate bearing below the foundations. When removing the existing fill, the excavation must extend laterally beyond the perimeter of the foundation for a distance at least equal to the thickness of the fill below the footing bottom. The influence zone of footing stresses can be represented as an imaginary 45° line extending downward and 9 Stillwater Senior Living Stillwater MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 outward from the footing bottom. All fill placed within this zone after excavation to remove the deleterious soils must be properly engineered, from the bottom of the cut, up to the floor slab subgrade elevation. During backfill of the deeper soil correction areas, the soils must be properly benched into the slope of the excavation to eliminate the risk of having areas or zones of uncompacted soils and to prevent a pre-existing failure plane along the excavation walls. Failure to properly bench the excavations and properly compact the new fill along the excavation walls will result in having areas of uncompacted fill below the building foundations and this can result in excessive foundation settlement. After stripping the surficial materials and excavating to the proposed subgrade level, and prior to placement of any new fill required to obtain proposed grades, the building and pavement subgrades should be surface compacted and proofrolled. The native clayey sand subgrade should be improved by surface compaction utilizing a heavy (minimum 10 -ton static weight) compactor, with a minimum of 10 passes (2 sets of 5 at right angles). The subgrade must then be proof rolled with a heavy roller or other equipment of similar size and weight such as a fully -loaded tandem -axle dump truck, to detect soft or unstable zones of soil which will require removal. The suitability of the subgrade should be verified after surface compaction and proofrolling by a qualified geotechnical engineer or engineering technician. Unstable soils should be expected, at least on an isolated basis. When encountered, they must be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. Scarification, drying and recompaction of wet soils or removal and replacement with suitable fill are two methods which can be considered, but this must be determined by the soils engineer at the time of construction. The subgrade soils should be scarified and compacted to at least the relative compaction percentages listed in the table below. All compactions are relative to the Standard Proctor Test, ASTM D698. Drying or wetting of the subgrade soils to within the listed ranges of the optimum moisture content, may be advised to facilitate compaction. MATERIAL TESTED PROCTOR TYPE MIN % DRY DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT RANGE FREQUENCY OF TESTING* Fill under Foundation Elements and Lateral Oversize Standard 98% 3 to +1 % 1 per 200 cy of fill placed or minimum of three tests per lift Structural Backfill (Building) Standard 95% -3 to +3% 1 per 1,000 cy of fill placed Structural Fill (Pavement, deeper than 3 feet) Standard 95% -3 to +3% 1 per 1,000 cy of fill placed Structural Fill (Pavement, shallower than 3 feet) Standard 100% -3 to +1 % 1 per 1,000 cy of fill placed Random Fill (non -load bearing) Standard 90% -3 to +3 % 1 per 3,000 cy of fill placed Utility Trench Backfill / Wall Backfill Standard 95% -3 to +3 % 1 per 200 cy of fill placed *Note — Minimum of one test per lift. 10 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 After subgrade preparation and observation have been completed, placement of new fills needed to obtain proposed grades may begin. The first layer of fill should be placed in a relatively uniform horizontal lift and be adequately keyed (where needed) into the stripped and scarified subgrade soils. During backfill of the deeper soil correction areas, the soils must be properly benched into the slope of the excavation to eliminate the risk of having areas or zones of uncompacted soils and to prevent a pre-existing failure plane along the excavation walls. The first lift of new fill must be placed so as to extend a minimum lateral distance of 5 feet beyond the planned top building pad dimension (for fills less than 5 feet in thickness), or for a distance equal to at least 1 foot laterally beyond the top pad dimension for every foot of fill thickness (for fills greater than 5 feet in depth). Subsequent lifts can then be placed on an approximate 1 H:1 V slope back up to the planned top perimeter dimension of the pad. Proper moisture control is essential to reduce the amount of compactive effort necessary to achieve the desired densities. Newly placed engineered fill materials should be free of organic, frozen, or other deleterious materials, have a maximum particle size less than 3 inches in the longest direction. Predominantly silt soils are not recommended to be used as engineered fill. Newly placed engineered fill should consist of either well -graded granular soils or clay soils with a minimum liquid limit of 25 and a minimum plasticity index of 12. Soils outside of these ranges should be reviewed by the geotechnical engineer for their proposed use. The existing non-organic fill and native clayey sand soils could be re -used as a source of engineered fill to backfill the soil correction areas. Any imported fill soil must be tested prior to placement to ensure the desired gradation and plasticity requirements are met. Engineered fill should be placed in maximum lifts of 8 inches of loose material and should be compacted within the moisture content ranges noted in the table above. These percentages are relative to the optimum moisture content value as determined by the Standard Proctor test (ASTM D698). If water is to be added, it should be uniformly applied and thoroughly mixed into the soil by disking or scarifying. The compacted structural fill should extend at least 10 feet beyond the edges of buildings and parking areas. In utility trenches, shallow foundation excavations, and other areas where large compaction equipment cannot be used, granular engineered fill should be placed as backfill. Engineered fill should be placed in accordance with the recommendations stated in this section of the report. Foundation Recommendations The proposed building can be supported by conventional continuous wall and column foundation system. Intertek-PSI recommends foundations be deigned to bear upon the native clayey sand soils encountered below the upper fill and surficial organic soils, or upon newly placed engineered fill founded on the native clayey sand soils. The existing undocumented fill is to be removed from within and a minimum of 10 feet beyond the building pad. If unsuitable soils are encountered at foundation bearing elevations, minor soil corrections may be required to bear in competent soils. The excavations to remove the unsuitable soils may be backfilled with the suitable engineered fill soils generated by excavations elsewhere on site. 11 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Intertek-PSI recommends that footings bearing on native soils or newly placed engineered fill, be designed for a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressures at the recommended frost depths as noted in the table below. These allowable bearing capacities are based on dead load plus design live load. Minimum dimensions of 18 inches for continuous footings and 30 inches for column footings should be used in foundation design to minimize the possibility of a local bearing capacity failure, even if the allowable bearing pressure recommended herein is not fully utilized. FOUNDATION TYPE DEPTH BELOW ADJACENT GRADES (IN) MAXIMUM NET ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE (PSF) Interior Isolated Column Foundations 24 4,500 Exterior Isolated Column Foundations 42 4,000 All Continuous Foundations 42 4,000 Based upon a finished lower -level floor elevation of 867± feet MSL, it is anticipated that exterior foundations would bear at an approximate elevation of 865± feet MSL. Undocumented fill was observed to depths of 25± feet below existing site grades at Boring B-01 (elevation 856± feet MSL) and in the proposed pond area at Boring B-02 to a depth of 15± feet (867± feet MSL). Additional undocumented fill should be anticipated during the demolition of the existing radio tower on site and near existing site utilities. The depth and consistency of the fill soils should be anticipated to vary between boring locations. Intertek- PSI recommends full removal of the existing fill from within the building pad. Due to the depth of the fill near Boring B-01, a representative of Intertek-PSI should be on site on a full- time basis during excavation in this area to determine the extents of fill removal and to observe placement and compaction of newly placed engineered fill soils to achieve design site grades in this location. The foundations must be supported by suitable bearing native soils or newly placed and properly compacted engineered fill that have been observed, documented and tested in the field by a representative of Intertek-PSI. Where existing fill or unsuitable bearing soils, such as wet or soft soils, are encountered in a footing excavation, the excavation should be deepened to competent bearing soil, and the footing could be lowered or an overexcavation and backfill procedure could be performed. An overexcavation and backfill treatment would require widening the deepened excavation in each direction at least 6 inches beyond the edge of the footing for each 12 inches of overexcavation depth. Overexcavations should be backfilled with an engineered fill placed and compacted as outlined in the Site Preparation section of this report. It is recommended that soils at bearing elevation in the footing excavations be observed and tested by an Intertek-PSI representative prior to concrete placement to evaluate the suitability and uniformity of the soils or newly placed engineered fill for support of the design foundation loads. The density of newly placed fill soils under the footings should be tested using the nuclear density testing method. To supplement density testing, hand augering and dynamic penetrometer testing of the native soils at foundation bearing elevations is 12 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 recommended. Testing should be completed below the footing bearing level for a minimum of one footing width or 3 feet, whichever is shallower. Each isolated footing should include at least 1 test probe. Tests should be performed every 20 -lineal feet in continuous footings. Based upon the recommended 4,000 psf and 4,500 psf bearing capacities, the foundation bearing soils should have a minimum dynamic cone penetrometer value commensurate with a Standard Penetration Test N -Value of 12 or 14 blows per foot, respectively. Exterior footings in areas that will not be subjected to freezing should bear a minimum of 42 inches below exterior site grades. Footings in unheated areas, such as the site signage or isolated canopy footings, should be located at a depth of at least 60 inches below the final exterior grade to provide adequate frost protection. If the building is to be constructed during the winter months or if footings will likely be subjected to freezing temperatures after foundation construction, then the footings and concrete should be adequately protected from freezing. Otherwise, interior footings can be located on the native sand soils or newly placed compacted engineered fill at shallower depths below the floor slab, compatible with architectural and structural considerations. During excavation of sandy soils, the exposed bearing surface will become highly disturbed. Therefore, after opening, footing excavations should be recompacted using a vibratory compactor while being observed by a representative of a qualified geotechnical engineer. After recompaction, the foundation soils should be observed and tested and concrete placed as quickly as possible to avoid exposure of the footing bottoms to wetting and drying. Surface run-off water should be drained away from the excavations and not be allowed to pond. The foundation concrete should be placed during the same day the excavation is made. If it is required that footing excavations be left open for more than one day, they should be protected to reduce evaporation or entry of moisture. Based on the engineering properties of the soils that were encountered at the test borings and the recommendations provided herein, Intertek-PSI estimates that the total foundation settlement for the shallow foundation system discussed above will be about one inch. Differential settlement will probably be about 75% of the total settlement. While settlement of this amount is generally tolerable, the structure must be designed based upon the estimated settlement and must include properly spaced vertical control joints to minimize the effects of differential movement (such as cosmetic "cracking" of sensitive masonry materials). Floor Slab Recommendations The building floor slab could be supported upon the native clayey sand soils, newly placed compacted engineered fill or upon the existing non-organic sand soils, provided the building subgrade is prepared and tested as outlined in the Geotechnical Discussion and Site Preparation sections of this report. Intertek-PSI recommends that a subgrade modulus (k) of 140 pounds per cubic inch (pci) be used for design considerations based on a 30 -inch diameter plate load test. However, depending on how the slab loads are applied, the value will have to be geometrically modified. The value should be adjusted for larger areas using the following expression for cohesive and cohesionless soil: 13 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, ks = (k) for cohesive soil and B ks = k (B+ 1 )2 for cohesionless soil where: ks= coefficient of vertical subgrade reaction for loaded area, k= coefficient of vertical subgrade reaction for 707 square inches area B= width of area loaded, in feet Intertek-PSI recommends that a minimum four -inch thick free draining granular mat consisting of select granular borrow be placed beneath the floor slab to enhance drainage. This material should have Tess than 5% of the material passing the #200 sieve by weight and less than 50% of the material passing the #40 sieve. The onsite materials are unlikely to meet this gradation, and this material would likely have to be imported. Polyethylene sheeting should be placed to act as a vapor retarder where the floor will be in contact with moisture sensitive equipment or products such as tile, wood, carpet, etc., as directed by the design engineer. The decision to locate the vapor retarder in direct contact with the slab or beneath the layer of granular fill should be made by the design engineer after considering the moisture sensitivity of subsequent floor finishes, anticipated project conditions and the potential effects of slab curling and cracking. The floor slabs should have an adequate number of joints to reduce cracking resulting from differential movement and shrinkage. Below Grade Wall Design Considerations Walls used to retain soils, such as the exterior foundation walls in the below -grade level are subject to lateral forces from the soils they retain. For walls that are not allowed to rotate, the lateral forces should be designed for the at -rest condition, Ko. For walls that are allowed to rotate, the lateral pressures can be reduced to the active condition, Ka. For movement into the soil mass, the passive pressure Kp should be used. Based on the soils encountered on site, the equivalent fluid pressures (in pounds per square foot) for lateral design should be in accordance with the table below. These pressures do not include the lateral force of groundwater on the walls. To provide for adequate drainage and prevent the buildup of excess wall pressures, PSI recommends that a free draining granular material, with less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve, be used as backfill behind walls. The free draining granular material should extend a distance of one half the wall height of 6 feet outside of the wall, whichever is less. Based on using a free draining granular fill is used to backfill the walls, the following design parameters are recommended: PARAMETER RECOMMENDED VALUE2 Backfill Unit Weight 130 pcf "Active" Coefficient of Lateral Earth Pressure, Ka 0.33 "Active" Equivalent Fluid Pressure 43 psf/ft of depth above water table 85 psf/ft below water table 14 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Coefficient of "Passive" Pressure, Kp1 3.0 "Passive" Equivalent Fluid Pressures 390 psf/ft of depth above water table 200 psf/ft below water table "At -Rest" Coefficient of Lateral Earth Pressure, Ko 0.50 "At -Rest" Equivalent Fluid Pressure 65 psf/ft of depth above water table 96 psf/ft below water table Coefficient of Sliding 0.40 Notes: 1. Ultimate passive pressure typically requires large strains to be fully mobilized, therefore, PSI recommends using 50% or less of the ultimate passive pressure to limit the strain on the structure. 2. The values in the Table are ultimate values and do not include a factor of safety The above values do not include the influence of foundation or surface loads in or adjacent to the wall backfill. For walls adjacent to roadways, a car load of 250 psf should be added to the weight of the overburden soil to determine the appropriate equivalent fluid pressure acting on the wall. Passive resistance should be neglected to a depth of four feet below exterior grade due to seasonal softening from freeze -thaw. In addition, the passive earth pressure values given above are based upon the concrete for the structure being placed in direct contact with the naturally deposited soils. If forms will be used to cast the concrete structure, fill material within the excavations surrounding the structure must be placed in layers that are less than eight inches (measured loose) and at a moisture content within three percent of the optimum moisture content determined by the standard Proctor compaction test (ASTM D698). The fill material should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by the standard Proctor test. In order to intercept groundwater and limit lateral earth pressures, free -draining gravel or crushed stone backfill is recommended to be placed adjacent to the below -grade walls. The gravel or crushed stone backfill should have less than 5% percent passing the No. 200 sieve and a maximum particle size less than three inches. The width of the gravel or crushed stone layer should be equal to half the height of the below -grade wall or 6 feet, whichever is less. If clayey or silty soils are placed against or near the below -grade walls or if the gravel or crushed stone layer is less than the recommended width or height, water -related and structural problems may develop. A one -foot -thick layer of relatively impervious clay is recommended to be placed above backfill that will be exposed to precipitation to minimize surface water infiltration. In addition, the ground surface should be sloped to drain surface water away from the structures. PSI recommends that backfill directly behind the walls be compacted with light, hand-held compactors. Heavy compactors and grading equipment should not be allowed to operate within five to 10 feet of the walls during backfilling to avoid developing excessive temporary or long-term lateral soil pressures. PSI recommends that a representative of a qualified geotechnical engineer be present to monitor foundation excavations and fill placement. 15 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Seismic Site Class The site is in a municipality that employs the 2015 Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC), which is based on the 2012 International Building Code. The 2012 International Building Code (IBC) requires that a site class be determined for the calculation of earthquake design forces in structures. The site class designation is a function of soil type (i.e., depth of soil and strata types). Rock was not encountered during this exploration. Based on Intertek-PSI's borings and experience in this area, Intertek-PSI is basing this site class designation on encountering rock at approximately 100 feet below the ground surface and that the consistency of the soils below the depth of the borings are consistent or stiffer than the 21 feet depth explored. Additional drilling is needed to define the depth to rock. Based on the estimated depth to rock and the estimated shear strength of the soil at the boring locations, Site Class "D" is recommended. The USGS- NEHRP probabilistic ground motion values interpolated between the nearest four grid points from latitude 45.0544°N and longitude 92.8287°W are as follows: Period (seconds) 2% Probability of Event in 50 y ears (�°g) Site Coefficients Max. Spectral Acceleration parameters Design Spectral Acceleration parameters 0.2 (Ss) 4.7 Fa = 1.6 Sms = 7.5 SDs = 5.0 To = 0.17 1.0 (Si) 2.7 Fv = 2.4 Smi = 6.5 SD1 = 4.3 Ts = 0.86 Sms = FaSs Sm1 = FvS1 SDs = 2/3*Sms T0= 0.2*SD1/SDs SD1 = 2/"Sm1 Ts= SD1/SDs The Site Coefficients, Fa and Fv were interpolated for IBC 2012 Tables 1613.3.3(1) and 1613.3.3(2) as a function of the site classifications and the mapped spectral response acceleration at the short (Ss) and 1 -second (S1) periods. Based on the Spectral Acceleration values for this site, this site should be defined as a Seismic Design Category A as defined in Tables 1613.3.5(1) and 1613.3.5(2). The Risk Category is based on the nature of the occupancy of the structure and is typically determined by the design team (Architect/Structural Engineer) or building official. The determination of the Risk Category is beyond Intertek-PSI's scope of services. Pavement Recommendations Intertek-PSI anticipates the subgrade soils will consist of either the native clayey sand soils, sandy silt soils, or newly placed engineered fill. Complete fill removal (if encountered) is not required under the proposed pavements; however, visibly organic soils should be removed prior to preparing the pavement subgrade. It should be noted that the silt soils encountered at borings B-9 and B-11 are extremely moisture sensitive, meaning that severe decreases in subgrade stability will occur with increases in soil moisture content. Within these areas, some surface stabilization or soil correction may be needed to provide a suitable subgrade condition. 16 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 These soils that pass proofrolling observations are considered poor to fair pavement subgrade materials and are considered moderately frost susceptible. After excavating to proposed subgrade elevation, the soils should be proofrolled and prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation section of this report. A detailed traffic analysis was not performed as part of this exploration; however, Intertek- PSI has used the following traffic loading parameters for design. The pavement section below is based on the subgrade soils obtaining a CBR value of at least 3. The existing subgrade soils and new fill material used to raise existing grades within the parking lot and drive areas must meet or exceed this CBR value. The following design factors were used in developing the recommended pavement sections: • Design Life: - 20 years • Terminal Serviceability: - 2.0 • Reliability: - 85% • Initial Serviceability: - 4.2 • Standard Deviation: - 0.45 • Light Duty ESALs: - 30,000 • Heavy Duty ESALs: - 60,000 • Standard Pick-up Truck for Snow Clearing If during the final design phase these values are determined to be incorrect, Intertek-PSI must be contacted to provide revised pavement recommendations. Based upon the soil borings, laboratory data and provided the subgrade soils are prepared as outlined in this report, the following flexible pavement section thicknesses are recommended for parking lot and drive areas. Light Duty Asphalt Pavement Section HMA Wear Course Thickness HMA Base Course Thickness Granular Base Course Thickness 1 1/2 inches 1 1/2 inches* 7 inches *If a front end loader is used for snow clearing, this value should be increased to 2 inches Heavy Duty Asphalt Pavement Section HMA Wear Course Thickness HMA Base Course Thickness Granular Base Course Thickness 1 1/2 inches 2 inches* 8 inches *If a front end loader is used for snow clearing, this value should be increased to 2 1/2 inches The granular base course should consist of well -graded crushed stone meeting the requirements from Section 3138 of the State of Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction. The granular base course should be placed and compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of the maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D698) and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. A representative of a qualified geotechnical engineer must test the base course prior to, and during, placement. 17 Stillwater Senior Living Stillwater MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Asphaltic binder and surface courses should meet the requirements from Section 3139 of the State of Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction. Asphaltic courses should be placed and compacted to the minimum required density ranges contained within section 2360 of the Standard Specifications. An adequate number of in-place density tests should be performed during construction to document the compaction. The pavements should be sloped to provide positive surface drainage. Water should not be allowed to pond on or adjacent to the pavement as this could saturate the subgrade and cause premature pavement deterioration. The granular base course should be protected from water inflow along drainage paths. Additionally, the granular base course should extend beyond the edges of the pavement in low areas to allow any water that enters the base course stone a path for exit. Otherwise, a storm sewer system may be appropriate to carry away storm run-off water. A flexible pavement system is not recommended in dumpster pad areas and areas where heavy trucks will turn frequently or will be parked. Within these areas, consideration should be given for use of a rigid pavement. Based upon the anticipated traffic volumes, Intertek-PSI recommends a concrete pavement section consisting of 6 inches of crushed aggregate base course and 6 inches of Portland cement concrete. The minimum compressive strength of the concrete should be 4,000 psi at 28 days. The concrete must be properly reinforced and must have appropriately spaced control joints. Infiltration Characteristics of Subsurface Soils and Pond Recommendations Generally, the subsurface soil conditions below the upper layer of topsoil consisted of sandy silt (Silt Loam) and clayey sand (Loamy Sand) to the depths of 15± feet below existing site grades in Borings B-02, B-03, and B-08 at the proposed stormwater management features. The sandy silt in Boring B-02 was undocumented fill, and variability in both the horizontal and vertical soil profiles should be expected. Field infiltration testing was not requested at the time of field exploration. However, for preliminary design purposes the following table provides estimates of design infiltration rates for different soil textures and is based on the infiltration rates published by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in accordance with Minnesota Stormwater Design Manual. SOIL TEXTURE NRCS INFILTRATION RATES (IN/HOUR) Coarse sand or coarser (COS) >20 Loamy coarse sand (LCOS) >20 Sand (S) >20 Loamy sand (LS) 6.3-20.0 Sandy loam (SL) 2.0-6.3 Loam (L) 0.63-2.0 Silt loam (SIL) 0.63-2.0 Sandy clay loam (SCL) 0.63-2.0 Clay loam (CL) 0.63-2.0 Silty Clay loam (SICL) 0.63-2.0 Sandy clay (SC) 0.63-2.0 Silty clay (SIC) 0.06-0.20 Clay (C) 0.06-0.20 18 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Depending upon the depth and elevation of the stormwater features, the predominate soil types at the bottom of the proposed stormwater management feature will be either undocumented fill silt loam, sandy loam, or silt loam soils. These soils have a relatively low to moderate permeability and will likely not be suitable to infiltrate water. The variability in the undocumented fill soils also reduces the anticipated infiltration capacity. For this reason, consideration should be given to the use of either at -grade detention ponds or the use of below -grade detention tanks as a means of stormwater management. At the time of this report, planned bottom of pond elevations were not made available to Intertek-PSI. Therefore, the infiltration rates referenced above should be used for preliminary design considerations. Due to the relatively low infiltration rates, a detention - type stormwater management feature may be more feasible The following recommendations are based on the general soil profile observed during this exploration, and should be verified once planned bottom elevations are known. The existing surficial organic soil and vegetation should be removed prior to grading at the proposed pond locations to expose the native clayey sand and sandy silt soils below. Care should be taken during construction to minimize construction traffic at the base of the stormwater feature. Once constructed, the areas should be barricaded to minimize traffic and protected from the accumulation of fines into the subgrade using a silt fence or similar means of sediment protection. In order for the pond to hold water, PSI recommends that a clay liner be installed in the bottom and sides of the pond. The liner should be a minimum of 24 inches thick. Typically, in order to maintain a stable excavation, the water table will need to be lowered to an elevation at least 2 feet lower than the lowest anticipated excavation elevation. Some temporary dewatering may be required if seepage is encountered from the observed perched groundwater on site. PSI recommends that fill placed for liners, if needed, have a minimum liquid limit of 25 and plasticity index above 12. The on-site materials will likely not be suitable for this purpose and import soils will be necessary. These soils should be tested prior to placement to ensure the desired plasticity characteristics are present. The fill should be placed in loose lifts not to exceed 8 inches in thickness and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the material's maximum laboratory dry density as determined in accordance with the Standard Proctor (ASTM D698). The materials should be placed and compacted at moisture contents varying from 0 to 3% above the material's optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with the above ASTM procedure. The performance of the pond can be affected by factors such as the introduction of sediment and organic materials to the pond bottom over time. Therefore, a pond maintenance program should be developed in order to remove sediment and organic materials. 19 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Concerning embankment slopes, it is PSI's opinion that properly constructed slopes as steep as 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (3H:1 V) would generally be stable, but would be susceptible to erosion and difficult to maintain or construct with rubber tired mowing or grading equipment. Therefore, embankment slopes of 4 horizontal to 1 vertical (4H:1V) or flatter are recommended. If final construction plans will include below grade stormwater detention or alternate stormwater management features, Intertek-PSI should be contacted to review the new plan and provide a supplemental report regarding the design and construction of the new structures. Depending upon the proposed design and/or location of the new structures, additional borings and/or test pits may be needed at that time in order to provide supplemental recommendations. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Intertek-PSI should be retained to provide observation and testing of construction activities involved in the foundation, earthwork, and related activities of this project. Intertek-PSI will not accept responsibility for conditions that deviated from those described in this report, nor for the performance of the foundation or pavement if we are not engaged to also provide construction observation and testing for this project. Moisture Sensitive Soils/Weather Related Concerns Increases in the moisture content of the soil can cause significant reduction in the soil strength and support capabilities. In addition, soils that become wet may be slow to dry and thus significantly retard the progress of grading and compaction activities. It will, therefore, be advantageous to perform earthwork and foundation construction activities during dry weather. Water should not be allowed to collect in the foundation excavation, on floor slab areas, or on prepared subgrades during or after construction. Areas should be sloped to facilitate removal of collected rainwater, groundwater, or surface runoff. Positive site drainage should be provided to reduce infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of buildings, beneath floor slabs, and within pavement areas. The grades should be sloped away from buildings and surface drainage should be collected and discharged such that water is not permitted to infiltrate the backfill and floor slab areas of the building. Drainage and Groundwater Concerns Groundwater was observed at depths of 4± to 29± feet below existing site grades (elevations 853± to 878± feet MSL) during drilling operations. During excavation for the below -grade level, perched groundwater may be encountered on a limited basis. Based on the observations during drilling, these volumes of groundwater should be able to be controlled using conventional sump and pump techniques or by the use of perimeter trench drains that connect and discharge the water away from the project area. If larger volumes of water are encountered, such as after precipitation events or during spring runoff, more intensive dewatering methods may be required. If these conditions occur, 20 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Intertek-PSI should be contacted for additional recommendations. The static groundwater level is estimated to be below the anticipated zone of construction. This depth is anticipated to be below the planned depth of construction activities. Variation in the groundwater level should be expected throughout the year depending on variations in the climatological conditions and other factors not observed at the time the borings were performed. Excavations It is mandated that excavations, whether they be for utility trenches, basement excavations or footing excavations, be constructed in accordance with current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines to protect workers and others during construction. Intertek-PSI recommends that these regulations be strictly enforced; otherwise, workers could be in danger and the owner(s) and the contractor(s) could be liable for substantial penalties. The contractor is solely responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations and should shore, slope, or bench the sides of the excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. The contractor's "responsible person", as defined in 29 CFR Part 1926, should evaluate the soil exposed in the excavations as part of the contractor's safety procedures. In no case should slope height, slope inclination, or excavation depth, including utility trench excavation depth, exceed those specified in local, state, and federal safety regulations. Intertek-PSI is providing this information solely as a service to our client. Intertek-PSI does not assume responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's or other parties' compliance with local, state, and federal safety or other regulations. Utilities Trenching Excavation for utility trenches shall be performed in accordance with OSHA regulations as stated in 29 CFR Part 1926. It should be noted that utility trench excavations have the potential to degrade the properties of the adjacent fill materials. Utility trench walls that are allowed to move laterally can lead to reduced bearing capacity and increased settlement of adjacent structural elements and overlying slabs. Backfill for utility trenches is as important as the original subgrade preparation or engineered fill placed to support either a foundation or slab. Therefore, it is imperative that the backfill for utility trenches be placed to meet the project specifications for the engineered fill of this project. Unless otherwise specified, the backfill for the utility trenches should be placed in 4 to 6 inch loose lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density and within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content achieved by the standard Proctor test, ASTM D698. The backfill soil should be moisture conditioned to be within 2± percent of the optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor test. Up to 4 inches of bedding material placed directly under the pipes or conduits placed in the utility trench can be compacted to the 90 percent compaction criteria with respect to the standard Proctor. 21 Stillwater Senior Living, Stillwater, MN Intertek-PSI Project No. 0678112 Compaction testing should be performed for every 200 cubic yards of backfill placed or each lift within 200 linear feet of trench, whichever is less. Backfill of utility trenches should not be performed with water standing in the trench. Granular backfill material shall be compacted to meet the compaction criteria in the Site Preparation section of the report. The geotechnical engineer can also specify a relative density specification for clean granular materials. GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect of the geotechnical evaluation. The primary reason for this is that the analytical methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. The analytical tools which geotechnical engineers use are generally empirical and must be used in conjunction with engineering judgment and experience. Therefore, the solutions and recommendations presented in the geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk-free and, more importantly, are not a guarantee that the interaction between the soils and the proposed structure will perform as planned. The engineering recommendations presented in the preceding section constitutes Intertek-PSI's professional estimate of those measures that are necessary for the proposed structure to perform according to the proposed design based on the information generated and referenced during this evaluation, and Intertek-PSI's experience in working with these conditions. REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations submitted are based on the available subsurface information obtained by Intertek-PSI and design details furnished by Kaas Wilson Architects and Ecumen Development. If there are revisions to the plans for this project or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, Intertek-PSI should be notified immediately to determine if changes in the foundation recommendations are required. If Intertek-PSI is not retained to perform these functions, Intertek-PSI will not be responsible for the impact of those conditions on the project. The geotechnical engineer warrants that the findings, recommendations, specifications, or professional advice contained herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices in the local area. No other warranties are implied or expressed. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer should be retained and provided the opportunity to review the final design plans and specifications to check that our engineering recommendations have been properly incorporated into the design documents. At that time, it may be necessary to submit supplementary recommendations. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by Ecumen Development, and their consultants, for the specific application to the proposed Stillwater Senior Living project in Stillwater, Minnesota. 22 APPENDIX SITE VICINITY PLAN BORING LOCATION PLAN LOG OF BORINGS USGS SEISMIC ANALYSIS GENERAL NOTES 4. e - Sunrise Prt ai-A414, -17 °deans yorn Intertek 3etterTogether. 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Project Name: Project Location: PSI Project #: Stillwater Senior Living South Brick Street Stillwater, Minnesota 0678112 Site Vicinity Plan Intertek P3etterTogether. 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Project Name: Project Location: Stillwater Senior Living South Brick Street Stillwater, Minnesota PSI Project # : 0678112 Nt Boring Location Plan Intertek TBM D Nt . *IS P3etterTogether. 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Project Name: Project Location: Stillwater Senior Living South Brick Street Stillwater, Minnesota PSI Project # : 0678112 Boring Location Plan DATE STARTED: 2/15/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-01 DATE COMPLETED: 2/15/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 31.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a� V While Drilling 29 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion 29 feet ELEVATION: 882 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Building STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek West Wing, North End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o 01 ry o cn o v' o Depth, (feet) I 1_L_L__ 1— 1 1 L I J J_ J J L 1 J L_LJ___ I— Lam_ L_ _l— __ _L —L— L LJ J Graphic Log Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 870 865 860 855 ����: ����4 I�i�i�4 ����4 i�����1 :�����:k ��i�i�i Ni�i�i : ���: ii�i�iii 4 ' 12 11 12 13 13 13 12 FILL, Sandy Lean Clay, Trace Gravel, Reddish Brown, Moist FILL 4-6-8 N=14 4-12-7 N=19 5-6-5 N=11 4-7-5 4-6-9 N=15 6-8-8 N=16 8-4-4 N=8 2-7-8 N=15 27 9 8 10 13�N=12 17 18 9 15 X X X FILL, Silty SAND, Trace Wood and Roots, Dark Brown, Moist FILL � �' �� ���� i����� FILL, ClayeySand, Reddish Brown, Moist12 FILL tILI FILL, Sandy Silt, Trace Roots, Organics and Wood, Dark Brown, Moist FILL r"l" ����� �������� �i�i�i� ���� i�i�i�4 i42 ������ 4 O O Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Loose Slight Chemical Odor SC rorA 40411 t; Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Wet, Medium SC MI End of Boring at 31 feet Boring Backfilled With Bentonite Grout / Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 VS 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/15/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-02 DATE COMPLETED: 2/15/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 21.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a� V While Drilling 5 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 882 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed North Pond STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek West End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) 1cnocn ocpDepth, (feet) I 1 l 1 1 L 1 1 J___ I- L _I_ L __ _L -I I_ L_�_1 Graphic Log Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 865 ����: ����4 i i ��:i�i�i� �����A ii�i�iii •�� iiii1 ������� 11 1 " 11 12 12 13 14 13 FILL, Clayey Sand, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist ¶ FILL 3-4-4 N=8 1-1-2 N=3 3 5 6 N=11 18-22-9 N=31 3-15-24 N=39 10-21-25 N=46 11 15 15 12 18 6 8 X O X O t•, X , FILL, Sandy Silt, Trace Roots, Organics and Wood, Dark Brown, Moist FILL870 r"l fi 14 iiiiI " X O Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Dense SC rroolf,1 401 �+�� � X X End of Boring at 21 feet Cave in at 7 feet Mi Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/15/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-03 DATE COMPLETED: 2/15/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 16.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a� V While Drilling Not Observed BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 881 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed North Pond STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii o, o cn o Depth, (feet) � �_�� ice_ �_i Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 870 . / 13 14 123-9-13 13 13 -'SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (3" Thick) /OL/ SC 2-5-6 N=11 3-7-10 N=17 N=22 18-25-20 N=45 4-10-12 N=22 14 11 11 8 5 5 a X Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium to Dense Gravel Encounted at 10' X X O O X O %rX X O End of Boring at 16 feet Cave in at 10 feet Mi Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/15/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-04 DATE COMPLETED: 2/15/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 26.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME-75 a� V While Drilling 10 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 883 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Building STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek West Wing, Center REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) cri oN cn o cn o Depth, (feet) I I 1 _L I L 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 L- J J- 1 L L_1___1_ L_ I I I Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture 0 LL • LL 50 0I Additional Remarks I5 I STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 870 865 860 //% /Sandy �% 13 12 13 12 12 12 13 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (3" Thick) SOL/ CL 3-7-11 N=18 3-7-11 N=18 6-12-16 N=28 3-2-1 N-3 4-8-9 N=17 4-14-25 N=39 6-15-20 N=35 22 11 12 8 10 3 9 8 X X O LEAN CLAY, Brown, Moist, Frozen Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium SC X X O O Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Wet, Very Loose SC Ff Et %l O X SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium SP X O r j Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Dense SC X 0 X 0 End of Boring at 26 feet Cave in at 15 feet Mt Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 N . 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street piffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/27/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-05 DATE COMPLETED: 2/27/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 36.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME-75 a V While Drilling Not Observed BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 893 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Bulding STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East Wing, West Side REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 GO 1\3 o 01 o cn o v' o Depth, (feet) L_ 1_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 �_L_ _L L LII L_ 1_1 1 1 1_1 Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture 0 LL • LL 50 0I Additional Remarks I5 I STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 890 885 880 875 870 865 14 14 14 12 12 12 12 14 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (8" Thick) OL 2-3-4 N=7 1-4-5 N=9 12-14-13 N=27 1-7-11 N=18 2-7-14 N=21 1-6-6 N=12 4-11-11 N=22 5-17-24 N=41 19 11 7 8 8 2 4 8 O X / Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Loose To Medium SC O, X O X O SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium SP LXJ� 1 1 X O X O X O Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Dense Continued Next Page SC X Mt Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 N . 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street pOff Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 2 DATE STARTED: 2/27/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-05 DATE COMPLETED: 2/27/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 36.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 d V While Drilling Not Observed BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 893 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS T LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Bulding STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East Wing, West Side REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) cn ca Depth, (feet) Graphic Log Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © 21 X Moisture PL • LL o 25 50 Additional Remarks I I I STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu 31E Qp o 20 4.0 " 14 Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Dense SC 7-18-20 N=38 8 X End of Boring at 36 feet Cave in at 13 feet Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 PS 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tION Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 2 of 2 DATE STARTED: 2/27/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-06 DATE COMPLETED: 2/27/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 31.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME-75 a� V While Drilling Not Observed BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 891 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Bulding STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East Wing, Center REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) o ccn ry o cn o cn o Depth, (feet) L I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I IA I I I I I _I I I L I Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture 0 LL • LL 50 0I Additional Remarks I5 I STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 890 885 880 875 870 865 860 = Al 14 14 13 13 12 12 12 12 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (12" Thick) OL 2-4-8 N=12 4-11-13 N=24 2-7-10 N=17 2-7-13 N=20 2-10-11 N=21 7-15-17 N=32 2-12-20 N=32 7-16-18 N=34 18 9 14 12 8 8 7 8 GoX Sandy SILT, Reddish Brown, Moist, Medium ML / /// Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Medium SC X C XO X 0 SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Medium to Dense SP LXJ� J LN j X \1 o X X © Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Dense SC /, !� X O End of Boring at 31 feet Cave in at 12 feet Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 N . 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street piffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/27/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-07 DATE COMPLETED: 2/27/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 26.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME-75 a� V While Drilling Not Observed BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 884 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Bulding STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East Wing, East Side REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 01 o cn o v' o Depth, (feet) 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 _I L_ J - 1 L -J 1 I_ L_ _1- L- I 1 I Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture 0 LL • LL 50 0I Additional Remarks I5 I STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 870 865 860X- 12 12 13 2 12 12 1 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (12" Thick) OL 1-1-2 N=3 2-3-4 N=7 2-3-5 N=8 1-4-5 N=9 2-6-8 N=14 5-8-10 N=18 7-12-20 - N-32 16 12 15 22 15 3 5 7 O X f/f j Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Wet To Moist, Very Loose To Loose SC 0 0 X X O X I LXJ� SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium to Dense SP X 0 X O X End of Boring at 26 feet Cave in at 8 feet Mi Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 N . 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street piffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/27/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-08 DATE COMPLETED: 2/27/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 16.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a V While Drilling 14 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 876 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed East Pond STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East Side REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) 1-a CI o Cr'o Depth, (feet) L_ L I I 1 J 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf ♦ Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 875 870 865 860 All 12 14 12 12 10 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (8" Thick) OL 1-2-5 N=7 2-7-8 N=15 3-6-9 N=15 4-7-11 N=18 3-2-11 N=13 21 16 11 14 10 11 ° X X Sandy SILT, Brown, Moist, Loose ML 7 Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium SC X X End of Boring at 16 feet Cave in at 5 feet Mt Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/22/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-09 DATE COMPLETED: 2/22/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 11.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a� V While Drilling 4 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 882 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Pavements STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek Northwest End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) o cn o Depth, (feet) 1 1_ I 1 1 1 L I I Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 l I 12 iSZ 12 12 13 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (10" Thick) OL 1-4-8 N=12 3-8-8 N=16 4-12-12 N=24 1-2-3 N=5 8 11 11 29 X IIIII rePil /�� Sandy SILT, Reddish Brown, Moist, Medium ML Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium Sc X X o O Sandy SILT, Brown, Wet, Loose ML 11111 O X End of Boring at 11 feet Cave in at 5 feet Mt Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/15/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-10 DATE COMPLETED: 2/15/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 26.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a� V While Drilling 14 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 880 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Building STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek West Wing South End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 01 o cn o �' Depth, (feet) I_ I I_ _LI L I I I I I I I_ L- J _I I I I I I_ L_ - 1- L- _ I I. Graphic Log Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 875 860" 855 : $.r y,,�a; i• 11 10 13 13 14 14 -\ASPHALT (3" Thick) SVM; AGG AS)1 SC 1-3-3 N=6 N3925oX870 3-10-13 N=23 4-3-8 N=11 5-16-22 N=38 4-6-21 N=27 10 12 12 6 24 6 X X -AGGREGATE BASE (9" Thick) r Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Loose o X SandySILT, Reddish Brown, Wet, Loose ML IIIII Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Medium SC865 r m1401 X O Sandy SILT, Gray, Wet, Medium ML Ili ° X Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Trace Gravel, Brown, Moist, Dense to Medium Sc �,�,,� a ` X 0 O End of Boring at 26 feet Cave in at 10 feet Mi Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/22/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-11 DATE COMPLETED: 2/22/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 11.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a V While Drilling 9 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion Not Observed ELEVATION: 880 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Pavements STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek Southwest End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) o cn o Depth, (feet) 1 1 1 1 Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL o 25 50 Additional Remarks I I STRENGTH, tsf • Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 875 870 1 t1 d • ' " 10 13 13 13 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (12" Thick) OL 234 N=8N=6 2-3-3 1-3-3 N=6 2-3-5 N=8 44 29 30 29 24 X X 101 Sandy SILT, Trace Clay, Reddish Brown, Wet, Loose ML a ° X X X End of Boring at 11 feet Cave in at 3 feet Mi Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 DATE STARTED: 2/27/17 DRILL COMPANY: Glacial Ridge Drilling BORING B-12 DATE COMPLETED: 2/27/17 DRILLER: B. Ruchti LOGGED BY:J. Rozmiarek COMPLETION DEPTH 26.0 ft DRILL RIG: CME -75 a� V While Drilling 7 feet BENCHMARK: See Remarks DRILLING METHOD: Hollow Stem Auger a Y Upon Completion 22 feet ELEVATION: 881 ft SAMPLING METHOD: SS 7 LATITUDE: 45.0544° HAMMER TYPE: Automatic BORING LOCATION: LONGITUDE: -92.8287° EFFICIENCY N/A Proposed Pavements STATION: N/A OFFSET: N/A REVIEWED BY: J. Rozmiarek East End REMARKS: Benchmark: Finished Floor Slab at the North Entrance to the existing Church, South of Site (=877.32' MSL) Elevation (feet) I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 01 o cn o v' o Depth, (feet) I. L L_1 1 - 1- I_I_ _ 1_ I _ 1-L_ L- J 1_ 1 1 1 1 I_ _ _L _1 L I 1 I Graphic Log 1 Sample Type Sample No. Recovery (inches) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION USCS Classification SPT Blows per 6 -inch (SS) Moisture, % STANDARD PENETRATION TEST DATA N in blows/ft © X Moisture PL • LL 0I 25 Additional Remarks I50 STRENGTH, tsf Qu + Qp 0 2.0 4.0 880 875 870 865 860 855 13 13 SURFICIAL ORGANIC SOILS (12" Thick) OL 2-4-6 N=10 3-7-8 N=15 1-1-2 N=3 2-9-9 N=18 2-8-10 N=18 2-8-14 N=22 2-7-9 N=16 15 12 35 11 13 11 11 O X Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium SC XO O X 13 12 12 13 3/ 3 Sandy SILT, Brown, Wet, Very Loose ML Clayey SAND, Medium Grained, Brown, Moist, Medium SC ' " 4 O O X O X O End of Boring at 26 feet Cave in at 6 feet Mt Professional Service Industries, Inc. PROJECT NO.: 0678112 NU 1 2915 Waters Road, Suite 112 PROJECT: Stillwater Senior Living Eagan, MN 55121 LOCATION: 114 South Brick Street tiffi Telephone: (651) 646-8148 Stillwater, Minnesota The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 of 1 RQ I Alryarlki . Rabe rttu 2/24/2017 Design Maps Summary Report usGs Design Maps Summary Report User -Specified Input Report Title Stillwater Senior Living Fri February 24, 2017 19:11:30 UTC Building Code Reference Document 2012/2015 International Building Code (which utilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008) Site Coordinates 45.0544°N, 92.8287°W Site Soil Classification Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" Risk Category I/II/III y North 9aks TE f °review Berl Hells IJadrFa+a Height, rills eights • ,.Little can ada Maplewcwd !Ih -ad: Jot ali orrv4ik white Bear Lake *North SeintPaul Oakdale Somerset LakeEflio i+:ek• +F,::11 Ann. Nickel USGS-Provided Output S5 = 0.047 g S1 = 0.027 g SMS = 0.075 g SM1 = 0.065 g SDS SD1 0.050 g 0.043 g For information on how the SS and S1 values above have been calculated from probabilistic (risk -targeted) and deterministic ground motions in the direction of maximum horizontal response, please return to the application and select the "2009 NEHRP" building code reference document. NUR Resp nse Spe•clrurn 1W 2J 143 0.90 LA0 1.20 Period, T (gec) 1..43 1.03 1.90 243 OA Boa Design Raspcxise Spat (rum a02 aai Baa 403 a20 a4] a@3 a90 1.00 1.20 1.43 Period T (sec) 1.0A 1.90 200 Although this information is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technical subject -matter knowledge. http://earthquake. usgs. gov/cn 1 /desi gnm Bps/us/s um m ary. php?tem pl ate=minimal &I atitude=45.0544&I ongitude=-92.8287&sitecl ass= 3&r i skcategory=0&edition= i b... 1/1 FarriQrs GENERAL NOTES Flify SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), AASHTO 1988 and ASTM designations D2487 and D-2488 are used to identify the encountered materials unless otherwise noted. Coarse-grained soils are defined as having more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve (0.075mm); they are described as: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine-grained soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are defined as silts or clay depending on their Atterberg Limit attributes. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS SFA: Solid Flight Auger - typically 4" diameter flights, SS: Split-Spoon - 1 3/8" I.D., 2" O.D., except where except where noted. noted. HSA: Hollow Stem Auger - typically 31/4" or 414 I.D. ST: Shelby Tube - 3" O.D., except where noted. openings, except where noted. BS: Bulk Sample M.R.: Mud Rotary - Uses a rotary head with Bentonite PM: Pressuremeter or Polymer Slurry CPT-U: Cone Penetrometer Testing with Pore-Pressure R.C.: Diamond Bit Core Sampler Readings H.A.: Hand Auger P.A.: Power Auger - Handheld motorized auger SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS N: Standard "N" penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2-inch O.D. Split-Spoon. N63: A "N" penetration value corrected to an equivalent 60% hammer energy transfer efficiency (ETR) Q": Unconfined compressive strength, TSF Qp: Pocket penetrometer value, unconfined compressive strength, TSF w%: Moisture/water content, % LL: Liquid Limit, % PL: Plastic Limit, PI: Plasticity Index = (LL-PL),% DD: Dry unit weight, pcf Y,2,z Apparent groundwater level at time noted RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS ANGULARITY OF COARSE-GRAINED PARTICLES Relative Density N - Blows/foot Description Criteria Very Loose 0 4 Angular: Particles have sharp edges and relatively plane sides with unpolished surfaces Loose 4 - 10 Subangular: Particles are similar to angular description, but have Medium Dense 10 - 30 rounded edges Dense 30 50 Subrounded: Particles have nearly plane sides, but have Very Dense 50 80 well-rounded corners and edges Extremely Dense 80+ Rounded: Particles have smoothly curved sides and no edges GRAIN-SIZE TERMINOLOGY PARTICLE SHAPE Component Size Range Description Criteria Boulders: Over 300 mm (>12 in.) Flat: Particles with width/thickness ratio > 3 Cobbles: 75 mm to 300 mm (3 in. to 12 in.) Elongated: Particles with length/width ratio > 3 Coarse-Grained Gravel: 19 mm to 75 mm (34 in. to 3 in.) Flat & Elongated: Particles meet criteria for both flat and Fine-Grained Gravel: 4.75 mm to 19 mm (No.4 to 3/4 in.) elongated Coarse-Grained Sand: 2 mm to 4.75 mm (No.10 to No.4) Medium-Grained Sand: 0.42 mm to 2 mm (No.40 to No.10) RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES Fine-Grained Sand: 0.075 mm to 0.42 mm (No. 200 to No.40) Descriptive Term % Dry Weight Silt: 0.005 mm to 0.075 mm Trace: < 5% Clay: <0.005 mm With: 5% to 12% Modifier: >12% Page 1 of 2 ~7■ GENERAL NOTES CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS Q„ - TSF N - Blows/foot Consistency 0-0.25 0-2 0.25-0.50 2-4 0.50-1.00 4-8 1.00-2.00 8-15 2.00-4.00 15-30 4.00-8.00 30-50 8.00+ 50+ Description Stratified: Laminated: Fissured: Slickensided: Very Soft Soft Firm (Medium Stiff) Stiff Very Stiff Hard Very Hard (Continued) MOISTURE CONDITION DESCRIPTION Description Criteria Dry: Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist: Damp but no visible water Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Descriptive Term Trace: With: Modifier: STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION Criteria Description Alternating layers of varying material or color with Blocky: layers at least'/ -inch (6 mm) thick Alternating layers of varying material or color with layers less than'/ -inch (6 mm) thick Breaks along definite planes of fracture with little resistance to fracturing Fracture planes appear polished or glossy, Parting: sometimes striated Lensed: Layer: Seam: SCALE OF RELATIVE ROCK HARDNESS Q„ - TSF 2.5 - 10 10-50 50 - 250 250 - 525 525 - 1,050 1,050 - 2,600 >2,600 Voids Pit Vug Cavity Cave Consistency Extremely Soft Very Soft Soft Medium Hard Moderately Hard Hard Very Hard ROCK VOIDS Void Diameter <6 mm (<0.25 in) 6 mm to 50 mm (0.25 in to 2 in) 50 mm to 600 mm (2 in to 24 in) >600 mm (>24 in) ROCK QUALITY DESCRIPTION Rock Mass Description Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor RQD Value 90 -100 75 - 90 50 - 75 25 -50 Less than 25 % Dry Weiqht < 15% 15% to 30% >30% Criteria Cohesive soil that can be broken down into small angular lumps which resist further breakdown Inclusion of small pockets of different soils Inclusion greater than 3 inches thick (75 mm) Inclusion 1/8 -inch to 3 inches (3 to 75 mm) thick extending through the sample Inclusion less than 1/8 -inch (3 mm) thick ROCK BEDDING THICKNESSES Description Very Thick Bedded Thick Bedded Medium Bedded Thin Bedded Very Thin Bedded Thickly Laminated Thinly Laminated Criteria Greater than 3 -foot (>1.0 m) 1 -foot to 3 -foot (0.3 m to 1.0 m) 4 -inch to 1 -foot (0.1 m to 0.3 m) 11/4 -inch to 4 -inch (30 mm to 100 mm) YY -inch to 11/4 -inch (10 mm to 30 mm) 1/8 -inch to 1/2 -inch (3 mm to 10 mm) 1/8 -inch or less "paper thin" (<3 mm) GRAIN -SIZED TERMINOLOGY (Typically Sedimentary Rock) Component Size Range Very Coarse Grained Coarse Grained Medium Grained Fine Grained Very Fine Grained >4.76 mm 2.0 mm - 4.76 mm 0.42 mm 2.0 mm 0.075 mm - 0.42 mm <0.075 mm DEGREE OF WEATHERING Slightly Weathered: Rock generally fresh, joints stained and discoloration extends into rock up to 25 mm (1 in), open joints may contain clay, core rings under hammer impact. Weathered: Rock mass is decomposed 50% or less, significant portions of the rock show discoloration and weathering effects, cores cannot be broken by hand or scraped by knife. Highly Weathered: Rock mass is more than 50% decomposed, complete discoloration of rock fabric, core may be extremely broken and gives clunk sound when struck by hammer, may be shaved with a knife. Page 2 of 2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS o MORE THAN 50/o OF MATERIAL IS LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE GRAVEL AND GRAVELLY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN',.•'. GRAVELS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) ., ,,,°%. ' •® a • �±®A® GIN WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES c;.,,, LI oJ a BO,,.. % (:;,c>p� o00o00 ° tJ Bo I GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF FINES) � o • 3O 1� o_ ' o �11 U ,°C p Q .4 /± GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - SILT MIXTURES rte AI 11' f�1� � �I��,� �� ',+! 94140/ �±� V CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND - CLAY MIXTURES SAND AND SANDY SOILS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SANDS (LITTLE OR NO FINES) .e.e.9.q.e.9.a.e SVV ED SANDS, SANDS, LITTLEDGRAVELLY OR NO FIN ::. SP POORLY -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLECLAYEY AMOUNT OF FINES) SM SILTY SANDS, SAND - SILT MIXTURES SC SANDS, SAND - CLAY MIXTURES FINE GRAINEDLESS SOILS SILTS AND LIQUID LIMIT THAN 50 CLAYS ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% OF MATERIAL IS SMALLER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE SILTS AND CLAYS MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR SILTY SOILS LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY ti mow, OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS L i, i' ,12., , 0 ,, ,,; „ pT PEAT, HUMUS, SWAMP SOILS WITH HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS TREE COUNT i. 1 1 -1- 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 .I .. 1 1 • -t PROPERTY ADDRESS: #114 Brick Street So., Stillwater, MN PID# 29-030-20-42-0042 / \ -1- 1 1 1 / \ _ .I 1 1-\ & #1616 Olive Street West, Stillwater, MN N OF ej�M/HoU "PND 115°1A \ GDDr\ uN-"4 \\\ R5E \ \ uND RLS#10938 w 4 \ 7? PID# 29-030-20-42-0001 50 0 (Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets) GRAPHIC SCALE 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. EXISTING POND NWL=856.2 HWL=860.5 00/ SS\,'60 / 61104/ \ . /1/ GSA (\�2� tJ�4'TA \\� F,, 3196 540.6 6E10 3195 dll, 546.8 SMA22-2STEMS 3191 546.8 BW23 3193 546.8 SMA38 3194 546.8 SMA15 3189 546.8 867.110 %1ATC 1 188 51.7 WI17 8 6.00 MAYCH 3179 552.3 3187 CRAB9 553.1 3172 BE7 544.7 3182 P09 548.6 P010 3181 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY INTERTK PSI, INC., DATED 03-03-17 GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED IN BORINGS RANGING FROM ±5 FEET TO ±29 FEET DEEP. B-01 ±853.00 B-02 ±877.00 J`B-03 NOT OBSERVED A/ \ B-04 ±873.00 \ O� 3-05 NOT OBSERVED B-06 NOT OBSERVED \ -07 NOT OBSERVED N 8 ±862.00 \7 ++878.00 11„ 1.; ±A 00 B-11 xM9t, 3-12 ±8 A 0 CITY OF S'1`119NATER GRADING NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY $RtcIC C7ADING NOTES. 3169 544.7 P09 553 OK11 3178 552.3 CRA: 18.00 AT,.;H / 869.48 MATCH 1 3171 544:7. 0010 3173 P09 544.7 -3STEMS 3176 542.2 CH7 3177 542.2 CRAB8 3210 546.3 P08 3207 546.7 6 2pR 87ATC".30: 3.1.676 . 7 547:0! 3140 3141 550. P08 7 544.4 P06 3142 ll, 547.83 P09 143 P089 863.1 3149 P066 09 31.5 3150 541.4 P07 557:7•1 .2 ...P06 548 879.90 583.6 5.74. ` 772 574.2.. -77.6 PO7 3129. EL8 5.8., •. 31 554.1 14%0• 44.4 515 GENERAL GRADING NOTES 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAY( 2, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE' LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL ( ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMEh SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNEF RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AL ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIE: NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELI PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW - NOTED. 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALL 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHE 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEI MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED ARE 7, PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS. FREES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TC ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL F ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PF 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MA' EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE • \ \ SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. ----t0. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO AREQQS DESIGNA � V6. 1E SITE. THE RESPRE�I $$ AS SPECIE AREAS, OUTSIDE 0. 3IL ! G PADS, F SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE -F RF,L, TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TC 5:7/4/ 77.5 H10, 815Si3 881.00 0.33 878.50 HP 879.00 880.33 881.00 880.33 881.00 881.00 ■ nnnR -- 60 -- 3058 860.1 CW25 879.D0r879.50 879.5500 87 881.00 880.33 880.33 856,83---- - 541-.34 880.33 FFE 881.00 GFE 870.33 876.82 3045 3046 3043 3042 859.4859.2 3044 859.5 859.6 W113 CW22 047 859.9 WI12 MA11 WU3 ( 56.3' 515 1( 858.9 / /t I► WI12 � 98043048 859.2 30519 CW29 859-2 � W 3049 m- 7 5� . V I 3062 • 8$1.00 DOOR 881.00 880.33 881.00 DOOR 881.00 881.00 871.66 880.33 879.93 879.93 0.80 880. 880.90 880 0.0 HC lir 870.00 879.00 HP 881.00 880.33 880.00 879.60 880.33 880.96 81.25 -� ATCH 880.00 878.99 879.64 880.33 %%4046 85.'AT5040 ♦ /MC3 8 1. 9 C/2f r ��/►j"y66 Jam\/ 30\3'. ��fFI��•iv+.. \`J %.810 o� maOCA y. 78'120 85 310 865. • j. WN4 �' 311Y . 86�.�4. '. 44;.. 865; �`.rra.7 12 WNt 864 3110. P093 879.36 880.33 881.00 878.95 DOOR 878.50 880.33 878.93 878.13 7.50 \ ,/ Q 860.9 .. Al2,(012,„. i WN7 c � C g o0 \J Y 861.1 61' WD .\\ J- CW24 CW2 d fes' 3036 •CW24 ~ 066 \ 3035 3033 302862.0 /16.3-..M020.2434 861.0 861.0861. NS WN10 CW25 EL8} 0- `u 3032 � ; ' 61.1 '69.1 „ i,,„,,'i • � of nT. W20 3024 D fillrak- iik 3031861.9 p 860 9�c�• WN11 1 3023 4 ' ♦ CW23 8%.:1 302Q .2...2' 4,1F ELM), X 86161s -,...a.,41•4 yyy- ♦ 8&fcQ%E1 N. TO -- 50.9 --560 --- 59.7 7117 3057 860.1 CW24 3060 861.1 WN7306 861. WN1 3063 861. EL6 3019 862.1 TP 3021 862.4 EL8 861.4 WN13 M W 30 0 86 .1 WN N N 0 6.42 875/%1 EX.BLDG. 76.27 - 863.6 876.10 IP - 876.84 876.14 _ r HP t• 879.55 872.1k 1 8 6.;7 FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 876.21 -So. line of of SE1 /476.30 876.75 876.70 876.30 3010 863 2 \004:00\,14:- -3011 00 ,14� O 3011 863. <i. -WW2 M ATCI-+ 3014 863.8 FOUND R1 -S# N0T GIME 'it co 878.46 876.68 878.15 - - X878.61 878.12 -878.133 - - 81.74 MATCH MATCH ATCH 876.30 MATCH 877.00 877.99 MATCH 876.58 877.20 877.20 MATCH MATCH xx y 100.00 ---,1-4‘=%-4-- 0 --, 1-4=%- c, 1. 0 V l o C co - �T 0 caN (A 9 bituminous *cross onto adj. property: FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE --1.2 BUS STOP �Y•�V t�5\8 \ w `A`• 1:• 0 Iri co 1 (� CONSTRUCTIb� LIMIT I 300.00 EXISTING BUILDING 87 827 ma 10 MATCH 816•'' -c 9 BENCHMARK: TOP OF MANHOLE; ELEVATION = 868.00 N8-�'' 11 "W 400.00 67°661.25 w U 0 U •8\ 872.30 MATCH C •I \ • s \\ 4`1 _ . 3016 865.1 CW28&25& SE corner Lot 15-. 3015 CW22 VVESTi OLIVE STREET C:\Users\erIcj\OneDrIve\CAD-1D\17076stIllwater-Senlor-Kaas\dwg\tree tally.dwg 10/6/2017 10110123 AM CDT 871. 11. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLE WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDIN FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATION: GRADES. AREAS T CONSTRUCTION " RUTTED BY TRAF' AREAS DISTURBE BETTER THAN 0 12. PRIOR TO PLAC STREET ANDIOR TANDEM AXLE T DIRECTION OF SOILS ENGINE PARKING AREA ACCORDANCE WI AT HAVE BEEN FIN ERA T INNS, T RAFFI COR ERODED BY V' BY THE CONTRAC1 AL CONDITION 0 NT OF THE AGGRE RKING AREA SUBG K WITH A GROSS I LS ENGINEER P E SOILS ENGINEE NSTABLE. CORR HE REQUIREMEh 13. TOLERANCES 13.1. THE BUILDIN 0.30 FOOT A MEASUREM 13.2. THE STREE BY MORE T ANY POINT W 13.3. SUBGRADE FINISH VE, OR 0.30 FOOT 'T IS MADE R PARKING AREA 1 N 0.05 FOOT ABOVE EREMEASUREMEI E ktFr.Fivpi 1LEVATIC 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO F 14. MAINTENANCE 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTE AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANI ARFAS TO SPECIFIFD TCOI FRANC'. 3067 THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODE! 862.5 65 5 RESEEDED AND MULCHED. 3003 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTEI 862.8 3002 OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEAT CW24 CW30 AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DE 3004 862.8 CW20 RLSL13774 GRADING PLAN LEC 4>I°c OF 137 891.00 TC So. line of N1/2 of SE Pl- vuwv JOB *17076 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ERIC R. VICKARYOUS Reg. No. 44125 fCRE LAND SURVEYING 763-458-2997 acrelandsurvelyagmail.com Serving Twin Cities Metro area and beyond Fl 10 11 12 j 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 TREE COUNT PROPERTY ADDRESS: #114 Brick Street So., Stillwater, MN & #1616 Olive Street West, Stillwater, MN TREES TO REMAIN: 1 -2540,212699.1180,501 276.8250,877.4890,CH1 0 2542,212711.9420,501248.641 0,877.5850,0K8 3019,212507.0650,501564.9120,862.1440, TP 3020,212500.881 0,501 565.9220,862.11 70,WN7 3021,212490.1730,501 568.8520,862.3540,EL8 3022,212492.8190,501563.9850,862.231 0,EL1 0 3023,212488.9280,501561 .1670, 862.2120, CW35 3024,212495.7870,501554.2540,861.8900, WN 11 3025,212499.9240,501555.9180,861.751 0,EL8 10-3026,212460.571 0, 501559.7680, 860.8740, WN 8 3027,212441.681 0,3027,212441.6810,501564.2710,861.4300, WN 13 3028,212432.5850,501557.4010,861.5510, WN1 9 3029,212463.0070,501537.5550,861.0780, WN 9 3030,212475.41 00, 501525.3030, 860.0880, EL8 3031,212493.2150,501525.6650,860.9330,CW23 3032,212494.7340,501527.4280,861.1 000,EL9 3033,212494.3280,50151 7.5250, 860.9770, CW25 3034,212487.7820,501 490.6480, 861.1170, C W20 3035,212504.1300,501 492.4730, 860.9800, WN 10 20-3036,212500.5880,501 479.1 730, 860.4250, CW22 3037,212492.1 580, 501459.4000, 860.8830, CW25 3038,212489.2030,501 459.6970, 860.6670, EL8 3039,212497.0420,501 454.4270, 860.6430, EL10 3040,212546.8850,501 448.9480, 860.1040, CW21 3041,212552.0920,501 448.9200,860.2200,CW21 3042,212554.7480,501453.3870,859.6500,MA11 3043,212560.2900,501 449.1 780, 859.4770, WI 12 3044,212559.9080,501 441 .3990, 859.8840, WI13 3045,212566.5880,501 463.6530,859.4390,WI13 30-3046,212574.5290,501 466.981 0,859.2050,CW22 3047,212573.5660,501 473.5930, 858.9260, WI12 3048,212577.0090,501 483.9900,859.2260,CW29 3049,212563.3520,501 487.671 0, 859.1350, WI 16 3050,212560.3130,501 476.0700, 859.2760, M A14 3051,212547.0590,501 459.5550, 860.0530, M Al2 3052,212538.8990,501 496.3500,860.2490,CW22 3053,212583.011 0, 501511.4490, 859.1690, WI 14 3054,212586.3820,501 533.9250, 859.6980, WI19 3055,212586.7520,501541 .2020, 859.6 720, WI 17 40-3056,212590.2690,501542.1 270,859.6620,EL7 3057,212587.5970,501548.6290,860.1 070,CW24 3058,212593.4330,501 560.0040, 860.0670, C W25 3059,212593.9330,501566.1 01 0, 860.0970, WN 6 3060,212561.7080,501 563.491 0,3060,212561.7080,501563.4910,861.0990, WN 7 3061,212557.8450,501 561.5160, 861.1870, WN 12 3062,212553.9200,501 549.4840,860.8500,WN7 3063,212550.7350,501570.1600,861.3990,EL6 3064,212538.8840,501537.6180,861.0730,CW24 3065,212534.6020,501538.0150,861.0730,CW24 50-3066,212516.2500,501558.1260,861.9790,WN8 3104,212418.3940,50155104,21 241 8.39.83 70, 86 2.3430, C W55 3128,212729.7820,501 218.1 270, 578.2380, EL8 3129,212731.261 0, 501208.6740,595.8370,P06 3130,212734.0550,501206.7490,574.16 40, P 07 3131,21 2738.081 0,50121 6.4490,584.3490,P08 3132,212736.7590,501199.0570,565.581 0, P08 3133,212739.2090,501198.5660,575.1 840, P06 3134,212730.931 0,3134,212730.9310,501202.8250,581.6330, P07 3135,212732.2160,501 200.4280,200.4280,583.5770,P07 60-3136,212734.3290,5011 79.3990,582.5850,WN1 0-6STEMS 3137,212747.2410,501241.2830,551.2290,P08 3138,212765.6150,501253.7620,546.1 860,P07 3139,212774.0620,501261.0390,552.6980,P09 31 40,212783.6160,501259.0350,550.7090,P08 31 41,212780.7300,501261.4180,544.3980,P06 31 42,212773.2610,501271.2310,547.7950,P09 31 43,212774.3820,501278.8000,545.9250,P08 31 44,212769.5340,501275.5740, 547.3760, B E10 31 45,212763.9530,501280.4040,537.9060,P08 70-31 46,212761.0690,501284.1900,554.2980,P06 3147,212734.8080,501278.5030, 544.3750, BE9 31 48,3148,212760.5670,501297.5760, 554.6980, P06 31 49,3149,212771.4410,501306.0750,541,6 470, P 06 3150,212769.941 0,3150,212769.9410,501306.8410,541.3530, P 07 3151,21 2766.8850,501303.5690,552.1530, P06 3152,212758.471 0, 501314.2190,550.8650,P08 3153,212790.5910,501250.3930,551.4910, BE8 3154,212772.2990,501231.1190,556.901 0,P09 3155,212762.2660,501 21 7.0590,557.7290,P06 80-3156,212762.2660,501 222.0590,557.7290,P06 3157,212761.7430,501211 .0820,.0820,557.7290,P06 3158,212751.2870,501218.8520,548.21 60,P07 3159,212751.5650,501220.8320,548.21 60, P07 3160,212767.2130,501 205.4870,205.4870,546.6300,P07 3161,21 2782.3030, 501199.1 880,546.3400,P09 3162,212784.531 0,501185.3060,559.1460,P08 3163,212783.9780,5011 75.0930,75.0930,550.9930,P06 3164,212784.0790,5011 76.8950,76.8950,550.8030,P09 3165,212784.2190,5011 79.391 0,0,550.8030,P09 90-3166,212792.5220,5011 67.3550,546.9960,P06 3167,212792.6970,5011 62.3580,546.9960,P07 3168,212807.51 40,501186.7320,544.6510, CH 8 3169,212809.0790,501176.8550,544.651 0, P09 3170,212811.2690,501163.0270,544.651 0,P01 0 3171,212816.4920,501186.1 040, 544.651 0,P01 0 3172,212819.4980,501187.3600,544.651 0,P09 3173,21281 7.71 30,501190.8530,544,6510,P09 3174,212808.8170,501194.1180,544.651 0, P07 3175,212797.4800,501 203.1850, 544.6150, P07 100- 3176,212815.1320,501202.8730,542.1 700,CH 7 3177,21281 4.6090,501208.8500,542.1700, CR AB 8 3178,212827.3830,5011 92.5370,552.3390,CRAB6-3STEMS 3179,212836.2460,5011 90.9740,552.3390,CRAB9 3180,212837.0200,501167.1700,551.589 0, P 07 3181,21 2838.4630, 5011 49.0580,548.5750,P01 0 3182,212838.4630,5011 44.0580,548.5750,P010 3183,212837.0740,5011 41.1 790,790,548.5750,P09 3184,212841.1250,501125.2540,553.1 500,P010 3185,212841.7350,501118.2800,553.1 500,0K11 11 0-3186,212856.0680,501123.9460,553.1 500,ASH1 0 3187,212856.6890,501136.1520,553.1 500, B E 7 3188,212889.0890,501122.521 0,3188,212889.0890,501122.5210,551.7440, WI17 3189,212895.3230,501120.8290, 546.7880, BE10 3190,212899.8120,501120.51 50, 546.7880, ASH 8 3191,21 2901.3960,5011 07.61 20,546.7880,BW23 3192,21291 4.7750, 501121.5610, 546.7880, SM A19 3193,212907.5770,5011 49.4930, 546.7880, SM A38 3194,212902.5950,5011 40.3200, 546.7880, SM A15 3195,212899.11 40, 501130.4910, 546.7880, SM A22- 2STEM S 120-3196,212949.4460,501129.3550,540.6450,13E1 0 3197,212763.8490,501163.4040,871.8490, P06 3198,212766.3400,501169.1 240,240,549.8530,P07 3199,212781.2830,501167.81 70,70,549.8530,P07 3200,212769.1 390, 501144.2700,550.3880,P06 3201,21 2776.2900,5011 50.6680,548.9480,P06 3202,212776.5950,501154.1 540,540,548.9480,P06 3203,212776.6380,5011 46.6830,46.6830,548.9480,P06 3204,212794.4830,5011 47.31 70,70,544.9050,P06 3205,212802.9690,5011 55.8020,55.8020,544.9050,P06 130-3206,21 2802.4490, 501134.7510,546.6580,P08 3207,212804.9490,501134.751 0,0,546.6580,P08 3208,21281 0.6410, 501140.4870,546.6580,P08 3209,212811.3450,5011 36.91 50,50,546.2950,P08 134- 3210,212811.3450,5011 26.91 50,50,546.2950,P08 #134 TOTAL C;\Users\eric j\❑neDrive\CAD-1D\17076stillwater-Senior-Kaas\dwg\tree tally.dwg 10/6/2017 10110123 AM CDT PID# 29-030-20-42-0042 PID# 29-030-20-42-0001 TREE TO REMOVE 2534,212679.9780,50121 8.0620, 885.3450, PI13 2537,212695.7500,501208.9000,884.61 30,PI1 4 3002,212356.851 0, 501571.3610, 862.5610, CW30 3003,21 2355.6330,501560.3080, 86 2.7800, C W24 3004,212346.1 460, 501560.0730, 862.7670, CW20 3006,212340.7240,501 566.5460, 862.8970, EL6 301 0,212328.8290,501581.0590,863.1910, CW22 3011,212321.8320,501580.791 0,863.4530,CW27 3013,212321.3790,501564.041 0, 863.1420, EL6 301 4, 212308.2070, 501575.3380, 863.8470, CW21 3015,21 2301.8660, 501574.2940, 864.4480, CW22 3016,212298.3230,501563.1 490, 865.0560, CW28&25&19 3017,21231 4.0220,3017,212314.0220,501535.4180, 864.6660, C W22 3067,212361.4000,501 567.5780, 862.4780, EL5 3068,212363.8250,501553.3650,863.11 50, B W6 3069,21 2363.3080, 501549.5890, 863.3060, B W4 3070,212340.8990,501541.9760,863.561 0, M A9 3071,21 2331.0830,501536.4280,864.1 320,WN6 3072,21 2311.8870, 501537.5320, 86 4.8230, EL5 3073,21231 0.4060,501526.4220,865.1300, EL5 3074,21231 4.651 0, 501520.6280, 865.3420, WN 5 3075,212313.0760,501 520.3730, 865.6 700, WN 7 3076,21 231 9.9550, 501518.3690, 865.3470, CW26 3077,212316.1920,501512.1 400, 865.8990, WN 5 3078,212346.8050,501507.4400,864.411 0,WN 6 3079,212347.5950,501503.521 0, 864.5370, WN 5 3080,212338.3780,501 492.9840, 865.3230, WN 6 3081,212355.5280,501 487.786 0, 864.8780, WN 8 3082,212361.6920,501 479.6580, 865.0510, EL8 3083,212362.1 470, 501478.2550, 865.0900, EL4 3084,212358.0600,501 462.2890, 866.5640, WN 4 3085,212365.2090,501 456.0770, 866.8630, WN 7 3086,212366.3860,501 453.2640, 867.6100, WN 7 3087,212365.1850,501 443.4340, 868.6 360, WN 6 3088,212369.31 40, 501443.1030, 868.7300, WN 4 3089,212356.4690,501 449.9070, 868.3740, WN 9 3090,212333.8190,501 460.0780,3090,212333.8190,501460.0780,868.1860, EL4 3091,212333.9770,501 466.6970,867.5220,0K5 3092,212329.9050,501 467.8460,867.3710,0K4 3093,212318.5160,501 467.8430, 867.4800, WN 5 3094,21231 0.1270, 501456.6850, 870.0350, WN 6 3095,212317.1940,501 435.4760, 870.3600, WN 7 3096,212309.2460,501 426.2250, 872.4430, WN 8 3097,212335.4570,501 433.0340, 870.0260, B W13 3098,212320.8480,501 429.9429.9370,870.3250,B W13 3099,212343.2530,501 436.9030,869.7190, WN 4 31 00,212349.5070,501431.8710, 869.8300, EL6 31 01,212343.3290,501 424.7950,870.7630,0K4 31 02,3102,212341.2190,501422.3390,871.0360, WN 4 31 03,212334.5480,501426.4470,870.9790,0K1 0 31 05,3105,212406.5250,501531.2770, 862.6480, CW32&35 31 06,212403.9730,501528.8170,862.2810, WN 5 31 07,212397.5360,501529.7100, 862.6500, WN 8 31 08, 212415.8030, 501520.8090, 862.8630, WN 6- 3STEM S 31 09, 212425.1060,501 482.5870, 86 4.2400, WN 7 311 0,212425.7150,501480.2750,864.3020,P09 3111,212424.0750,501 479.4890,864.2270,P06 3112,212445.3580,501 46 9.6470, 86 4.4900, WN 8 3113,212451.2780,501 456.9020, 865.3910, WN 13 311 4,212459.6230,501463.3850,864.9350,L01 3 3115,212460.011 0, 501457.7180, 864.8760, WN 4 3116,212468.6160,501 455.5860,865.0950,L012 3117,212471.1260,501 448.0400, 865.5980, WN 4 3118,212478.6980,501 448.0240, 865.1630, L01 2 3120,212486.8960,501 41 4.0260, 866.7040, WN 14 3121,212519.9000,501 404.4040, 865.1930, P01 9 3122,212586.411 0, 501336.9950,874.3630,P01 8 3123,212590.9490,501337.491 0,874.5730,P016 3127,212691.3730,501 228.7350, 576.5750, P 114 #69 TOTAL JOB #17076 (Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets) GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ERIC R. VICKARYOUS Date: 1 0/06/201 7 Reg. No. 44125 NORTH ACRE LAND SURVEYING Serving Twin Cities Metro E area and beyond 17 763-458-2997 acrelandsurveygmail.com 1 1 .. 11. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 X11 j12 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 0 rt N N co 548'-11 5/8" 176-10" 232'-911/16" 139'-315/16" 109'-4" 54'-8" OLevel -1 1" = 20'-0" 111MILII ❑ El UNEXCAVATED Elev. Lobby 002 Storage 003 it � IV LTJ 122'-2" 83 82 81 80 75 78 UNEXCAVATED 73 76 71 74 69 72 67 LI 70 65 68 63 66 61 64 co N 59 62 57 60 55 58 53 56 51 49 Garage 001 iu I�1 PFJ Ll 212'-91 /2" u IJ al 54 52 50 48 45 46 El 1th aip. 06D07- 008 Key Common 00 LO 090 6 4 2 10 9 8 7 5 3 1 701-211 MUA Garage Ecumen - Stillwater Stillwater, MN f 129 Unit 0-6 105 Unit 3-2 IL 2 Level 1 J1 " = 20'-0" VA V M N N SD_502 151 Unit 0-2 MC 1� 150 Unit 0-3 J 149 Unit 0-3 1.--=H1=11====1111° -' ❑ IL Stair 199 148 Unit 0-2 MC 152 Unit 0-1 153 Unit 0-1 L J 147 Unit 0-1 146 Unit 0-1 0 109'-83/8" 154 Unit 0-1 145 Unit 0-6 0 155 156 157 Unit 0-7 Unit 0-7 Unit 0-1 :�iM k RS6 144 Unit 0-1 MC Dini 184 9 % 1.. 0 SD_502 SD_50 SD_503 54'-8" 143 Unit 0-1 SD_50 137 Unit 0-2 MC 136 Unit 0-3 135 Unit 0-3 134 Unit 0-2 MC 142 Unit 0-1 a MC Dayroom 185 141 Unit 0-1 140 Unit 0-1 138 139 Unit 0-1 Unit 0-1 RA 311 MC Support 186 158 Unit 0-5 159 Unit 0-1 160 Unit 0-1 161 Unit 0-1 0 CO 0 SD_502 Corn 163 1 Stair 198 MC Activities 187 133 Unit 0-1 120'-10" Fitness Stair Kitchen 1,169 ft2 fining Di A 6 r. I :s 189 190 195F 126 Unit 0-1 127 Unit 0-1 f 128 Unit 0-6 130 Unit 0-1 131 Unit 0-1 132 Unit 0-4 L11 0 SD_503 SD 500' Ex Dir or 19G arkrrg/ ! 1 ci5E 0 ii LI ery Bistro Lobby 166 M� Li PATIO Community Room Mail 327 rt -1 ll ll 213'-51/2" SD_502 106 Unit 1-1 IL 323 Unit 1-5 IL ISD 500 321 Unit 3-2 IL 7 SD_50 111 Unit 3-3 IL Key Common IL MC MC Commons SD_501 196 LO 114 Unit 4-1 {_ J 112 Unit 3-5 IL 113 Unit 4-1 71'-6" SD501 aas wilson architects Ecumen I� SD_501 First Floor & Site Plan Ecumen - Stil wa er Stillwater, MN Swjng O" .1 : iic r8e ing :�iM k RS6 19P. — 31, — 19 B 19 C 4 189 190 195F 126 Unit 0-1 127 Unit 0-1 f 128 Unit 0-6 130 Unit 0-1 131 Unit 0-1 132 Unit 0-4 L11 0 SD_503 SD 500' Ex Dir or 19G arkrrg/ ! 1 ci5E 0 ii LI ery Bistro Lobby 166 M� Li PATIO Community Room Mail 327 rt -1 ll ll 213'-51/2" SD_502 106 Unit 1-1 IL 323 Unit 1-5 IL ISD 500 321 Unit 3-2 IL 7 SD_50 111 Unit 3-3 IL Key Common IL MC MC Commons SD_501 196 LO 114 Unit 4-1 {_ J 112 Unit 3-5 IL 113 Unit 4-1 71'-6" SD501 aas wilson architects Ecumen I� SD_501 First Floor & Site Plan Ecumen - Stil wa er Stillwater, MN [I VA V `-7-2 Level 2 1" = 20'-0" SD_502 547-7 5/8" 250 Unit 2-2 AL r Stair 299 248 Unit 3-1 AL 252 Unit 2-3 AL 246 Unit 3-8 AL 254 256 Unit 2-8 AL 244 Unit 2-3 AL 109'-4" SD_50 SD_502 SD_503 SD_503 2 54'-8" 242 Unit 2-4 AL 240 Unit 3-2 AL 236 Unit 2-2 AL 238 Unit 2-4 AL 237 Unit 2-3 AL 235 Unit 2-2 AL Stair 298 234 Unit 1-2 AL 120'-10" 260 Unit 1-2 AL Nursing 394 Clinica Director 296 Multipurpose 226 Unit 1-2 AL 228 Unit 1-2 AL 316 Unit 1-2 IL Stair 297 325 Unit 1-5 IL 233 Unit 1-2 AL 230 Unit 1-2 AL 232 Unit 3-4 AL SD_503 SD_500 229 Unit 1-5 IL 317 Unit 1-2 IL 318 Unit 1-2 IL 224 Unit 1-6 IL OPEN TO BELOW 213-5 1 /2" 272 Unit 3-2 IL SD_502 273 Unit 1-1 IL 382 Unit 3-2 IL SD_500 222 Unit 3-2 IL 253 Unit 3-7 IL 271 Unit 3-1 IL SD_50 247 Unit 2-6 IL Key (SD_501 AL Common IL Stair 296 241 Unit 4-1 249 Unit 3-5 IL 243 Unit 4-1 71'-6" SD 501 aas wilson architects Ecumen I� SD_501 Second Floor Ecumen - Stil wa er Stillwater, MN 384 Unit 1-6 IL 358 Unit 3-6 IL 356 Unit 2-3 IL 354 Unit 2-3 IL rt SD 50 Level 3 1" = 20'-0" SD 502 547'-7 5/8" 32'-0" 143'-9 7/8" 233'-1 13/16" 138'-715/16" 32'-1" Stair 399 352 Unit 2-7 IL 24'-1" 32'-1" 36 Unit 1-2 AL SD_503, 4 9 co S D_502 32'-4 5/8" 88'-91 /4" SD 503 200 Unit 2-5 IL SD 502 Key aas wilson architects Ecumen I� S D_501 AL Common IL 9 Go o Stair 39 71'-6" 286 Unit 4-1 SD 501 SD 5011 Third Floor Ecumen - Stil wa er Stillwater, MN LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 111 1 - - - Elevation 1 - a 1/8" = 1 1 1 BRICK VENEER LAP SIDING BRICK VENEER P P BRICK VENEER Truss Brg. O 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING Level 3 AL 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 AL 100'-0" PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 111 1 1 11 - -' ,III1IIIII ill BRICK VENEER 21 Elevation 17 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" LAP SIDING BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER Truss Br• 131'-5 5/8" Level 3 AL 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 AL 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 100'-0" PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING 11 111 1 1 Elevation 3 - a BRICK VENEER 1/8" = 1'-0" ri 1 aas wilson architects BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER I LAP SIDING Truss Br 131'-5 5/8" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Level2 111'-1 7/8" , Level 1 100'-0" Ecumen Exterior Elevations Ecumen Stillwater, MN F LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 1 1 -I- 1 - Elevation 4 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" COLORED ARCHITECTURAL CMU LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER 1 1 1 - - 1 1 1 - - - Truss Br 131'-5 5/8" /- PANEL SIDING Level 3 AL 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 AL 111'-1 7/8" BRICK VENEER Level 1 100'-0" COLORED - ARCHITECTURAL CMU 1 1 - - - 1 - - 1 Elevation 6 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER COLORED ARCHITECTURAL CMU LAP SIDING 1 - 1 1 -f- 1 - PANEL SIDING 1 1 - 1 1 - - - �J 1 1 -�- 1 1 - LAP SIDING /- LAP SIDING 1 1 - - - u id VJ hi 1.61,LWiI... kLiJ_-_ 1 - 1 - 1 - 6,1,6 .1J. Biu 1 - - 1 1 1 - -1- 1 1 PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER Elevation 5 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" LAP SIDING LAP SIDING LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING 1 - 1 1 mimm 1 n COLORED ARCHITECTURAL CMU rr` Elevation 7 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" aas wilson architects Truss Bro. AL 131'-5 5/8" Level 3 AL 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 Aik 111'-1 7/8" BRICK VENEER Level -1 Level 1 AL 100'-0" 89'-4" C Truss Br 131'-5 5/8" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" IF Level 2 AL 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 AL 100'-0" Level -1 89'-4" LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING 1 - 111 PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 1 1 1 - 0 1� 1111111111 11 lil I'' II 1 1 1 / LAP SIDING N�hhINN�NMINNIhhINN�hhINN�hhl NINh�I BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER Truss Br . 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING Level 3 j 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 1 100'-0" Exterior Elevations Ecumen Stillwater, MN 111 LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING Elevation 8 - a LAP SIDING Or BRICK VENEER I�r o r PANEL SIDING 1 LAP SIDING LAP SIDING LAP SIDING ■ ■ • Hill Truss Br 131'-5 5/8" I. ,„,_,,. Aiii BRICK VENEER ■ �u '1 - BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER 1■ - BRICK VENEER 1� ii Level 2 AL 111'-1 7/8" �I Level 1 AL 100'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 Al 1 1 PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING Elevation 9 - a 1/8" = 1 '-0" BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER LAP SIDING Truss Br 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING Level 3 122'-3 3/4" 111 Level 2 '-1 7/8" Level 1 100'-0" LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING q 1 • PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING Elevation 10 - a BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER Truss Brg. 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING Level4" 122'-3 3/4" 111 Level 2 '-1 7/8" Lever 100'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" Truss Brg. 131'-5 5/8" Level3 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" `--r- MC FENCE Level BRICK VENEER Elevation 11 - a BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER 100'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" rt 1 aas wilson architects PANEL SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER Elevation 14 - a BRICK VENEER MC FENCE BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER Truss Br . 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 100'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations Ecumen Stillwater, MN PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING PM" PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 1 LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING 1 Elevation 2 - a 1/8" = 1-0" BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER Truss Brg. 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 AL 100'-0" LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING u VA V LAP SIDING LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 11 1 BRICK VENEER Elevation 16 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" aas wilson architects BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER LAP SIDING LAP SIDING Truss Br• 131'-5 5/8" PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER OElevation 12 - a 1/8" = 1'-0" PANEL SIDING Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 100'-0" PANEL SIDING Truss Brq. 131'-5 5/8" lir Level 3 122'-3 3/4" Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 100'-0" PANEL SIDING BRICK VENEER - LAP SIDING PANEL SIDING LAP SIDING 1 • MC FENCE ®1-a 1 /8" = 1'-0" BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER r 1 BRICK VENEER PANEL SIDING Truss Brq. 131'-5 5/8" Level 3 122'-3 3/4" PANEL SIDING Level 2 111'-1 7/8" Level 1 100'-0" 1111...., 1111 1111111E1 Exterior Elevations Ecumen Stillwater, MN rtvk \ 't aas wilson architects BIRD'S EYE - LOOKING EAST YECUMEN. aas wilson architects BIRD'S EYE - LOOKING WEST )(ECUMEN® rtyk \ Yi <aas wilson architects 181 DEER PATH - 3 -STORY YECUMEN. Ft if • • • - r- ,..„,...„..,.....1.„,,,. ---Y-1 —......--,' _--' - • • -24 • "rr, ' - r•-• „ ;7.7 0 • - ••r„-, e ,,,, .--;1' , „„4,1-,_.,---..,:_:::::-::::-.;,:l- : .,.. - z..... --_,t.„,-1"-• - -, ,.....:,...:;-t),,.4:':,11:-. ,74* 4? ......::::,'''-..y.7 -:''''-'":":"! ti---;.: , -- _ _ ,,,. ., .. ,..._:.4......-,,,,, , . .:. 4' ., :„...;‘,........ ,1 *.•'.),;,,-, . - ,. — ' , f -r- - . , , --• _.f•-•::4''..'e--i.-','.;*':-f,,;--;';',..: '' ,,:.:;•;.,:•3-1-'-'....,. -_ --: tr'..../1-7--Te..--- " ' -''' • '. s ; ' ' -1).-A--, , -- - .-• ,,,„,,__ , 4. -7-''' ) , .(...1 J .-- 3,-.. --,l '' -.---- ---.., -$'' 1 ' ''' ' ' .. ti. ' .._- ,C'' ; - . - , ' ----- x.-_' ' ' ' ' ,, - , - r '''' ' ' -_,.:" - ,-'''''' !,' ' 4 P o:•,:r.:4 \ .i.,.= (,.„....",, ' : . $-- ,. , -,_ $ - , _ ..., , ,,, - ' - ' ' :' , . -,...; ./.....-- - - - J . ' ' . - '-. ''''''''" .4.•."'il- ,..'" ' ' ' ".' ... _ ...$ ''''': • ,. • .-'•.: - , ...,.-..- „-,,,,, • .--- .. . 'L.' r'''' 4 • ,-=-•' - i ' ' ,-_, -", „ , <aas wilson architects • - • ..,`"•••• - " 7 211 DEER PATH - 3 -STORY „ 74" . •,• , iigrv- • - - 'RP .4! • .1 $ )(ECUMEN® rtyk \ Yi <aas wilson architects 181 DEER PATH - 3 -STORY YECUMEN. Ft if • • • - r- ,..„,...„..,.....1.„,,,. ---Y-1 —......--,' _--' - • • -24 • "rr, ' - r•-• „ ;7.7 0 • - ••r„-, e ,,,, .--;1' , „„4,1-,_.,---..,:_:::::-::::-.;,:l- : .,.. - z..... --_,t.„,-1"-• - -, ,.....:,...:;-t),,.4:':,11:-. ,74* 4? ......::::,'''-..y.7 -:''''-'":":"! ti---;.: , -- _ _ ,,,. ., .. ,..._:.4......-,,,,, , . .:. 4' ., :„...;‘,........ ,1 *.•'.),;,,-, . - ,. — ' , f -r- - . , , --• _.f•-•::4''..'e--i.-','.;*':-f,,;--;';',..: '' ,,:.:;•;.,:•3-1-'-'....,. -_ --: tr'..../1-7--Te..--- " ' -''' • '. s ; ' ' -1).-A--, , -- - .-• ,,,„,,__ , 4. -7-''' ) , .(...1 J .-- 3,-.. --,l '' -.---- ---.., -$'' 1 ' ''' ' ' .. ti. ' .._- ,C'' ; - . - , ' ----- x.-_' ' ' ' ' ,, - , - r '''' ' ' -_,.:" - ,-'''''' !,' ' 4 P o:•,:r.:4 \ .i.,.= (,.„....",, ' : . $-- ,. , -,_ $ - , _ ..., , ,,, - ' - ' ' :' , . -,...; ./.....-- - - - J . ' ' . - '-. ''''''''" .4.•."'il- ,..'" ' ' ' ".' ... _ ...$ ''''': • ,. • .-'•.: - , ...,.-..- „-,,,,, • .--- .. . 'L.' r'''' 4 • ,-=-•' - i ' ' ,-_, -", „ , <aas wilson architects • - • ..,`"•••• - " 7 211 DEER PATH - 3 -STORY „ 74" . •,• , iigrv- • - - 'RP .4! • .1 $ )(ECUMEN® aas wilson architects 181 DEER PATH - 2 -STORY ENDS )(ECUMEN® aas wilson architects 211 DEER PATH - 2 -STORY ENDS )(ECUMEN® rtvk \ 't aas wilson architects CORNER OF W MYRTLE ST + BRICK ST S YECUMEN. ' ,gyp 11 z _ Co ��- rty C O f'1 yY: oar. F • F' P aas wilson architects ENTRY YECUMEN. Heating & Air Conditioning ants® PTAC Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner UP TO 12.0 EER 3.4 COP Wise Decision. It's an Amana® brand. FUONIPeorzWirelenummille liftoff" VENN.. IrW Premium Amana Brand Quality mana is a registered trademark of Maytag Corporation or s related companies and is used under license to Goodman ompany, L.P., Houston, TX, USA. All rights reserved. Outstanding / Premium Energy Performance and Comfort Management System PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR CONDITIONER PTAC UPT012.0 EER 1 3.4 COP Distinguishing features: Energy -Saving Efficiency The DigiSmart® system is the first of its kind for the Amana brand. Compared to the energy consumption of a standard Amana brand PTAC product without DigiSmart, the DigiSmart Wireless Energy Management System for Amana brand PTACs can reduce energy costs up to 35%°. Beyond the benefits of reduced energy consump- tion, the DigiSmart system can assist in monitoring unit performance and targeting maintenance. Simply stated, the DigiSmart system employs an in -room wirelessthermostat and occupancy sensor connected with the push of a single button. No wiring is required. This allows you to connect all the PTACs in your building so they can be monitored from a single controller. At any time, you can tell if the unit is running, if the room is occupied and even view whether any maintenance is necessary on any of the connected PTACs. Experience Quiet Comfort You can be assured that your Amana brand PTAC will provide your guest with quiet comfort and operation. To minimize the operating sounds, we've acoustically engineered our system with enhancements that include an indoor tangential fan for quiet and even air distribution, and a two -speed indoor motor for enhanced guest comfort. Additionally, the two -speed outdoor fan allows for lower overall sound, as compared to units without this feature. How the Amana® brand makes your decision easier From day one, every Amana° brand product has been made with the same core philosophy: to provide customers with high-quality products that are reliable, meet their needs, and last longer than the rest. And we keep that philosophy firmly in mind as we build our Amana brand Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners (PTACs). Whether you are in the hotel/hospitality industry or provide assisted living services, Amana brand PTACs are designed to provide your business with plain -and -simple product durability and advanced energy management features, while helping you to create the best indoor comfort possible. Commitment to quality engineering Always in pursuit of the highest perfor- mance and efficiency, our engineers are constantly evaluating the latest technology and applying it to every Amana brand PTAC.Thiscommitment to constant improvement ensures that our units continue to meet or surpass industry standards. The Amana brand line of air PTACs is designed and built to ensure dependable operation with continuous, trouble-free cool- ing comfort. But best of all, the operation of your PTAC can be monitored and reviewed by your personnel with the use of the DigiSmart° Energy Management System that we build into all of our premium Amana brand PTACs. This system monitors data from the unit and detects the potential cause of system-* Complete warranty details available from your related issues. local dealer or at www.amana-ptac.com. The securityof theAmana brand's amazing limited warranty* To truly seal the deal, an Amana brand PTAC Air Conditioner is backed by our industry-leading limited warranty*. The longevity of premium Amana brand products combined with this excellent warranty* coverage offers you a level of purchase protection that's the stuff of legend. LIMITED WARRANTY* PROTECTION LIMITED WARRANTY* LIMITED WARRANTY* Heating 8 Air Conditioning ana LASTS AND LASTS AND LASTS. www.amana-ptac.com Heating & Air Conditioning ana LASTS AND LASTS AND LASTS: The Amana® brand PTAC advantages: Designed and assembled in the U.S.A. for over 35 years e0 DigiSmart® control board for energy savings 0 Indoor tangential fan for quiet operation and optimal air distribution O EER Up To 12.0 and up to 3.4 COP with AHRI Certified Performance meetingASHRAI 90.1 2010 standards O Reliable design with R -410A refrigerant filter drier and high-pressure switch O Two fan motors for quiet operation 0 Compatible with the DigiSmart° Wireless Energy Management System - Providing up to 35% more energy savings as compared to energy consumption of a standard Amana brand PTAC without the DigSmart system (when installed with DTO1G, DDO1E and Amana brand PTAC*) 1 UP TO 12.0 EER DigiSmart:;:' rresent over time as compared to the same PTAC model withoutthe DigiSmart EMS System installed and were generated using general assumptions including energy loads, local weather averages and use of occupancy controls. Actual savings will vary according to actual use habits, room square footage, and how the unit is installed. A legacy of comfort The impeccable reputation of an American original Amana brand heating and cooling systems are a part of the enduring legacy of one of America's most recognized and respected brands. Originating eight decades ago in Amana, Iowa, the brand is synonymous with long-lasting, premium quality products — from home appliances to heating and air conditioning equipment. Chances are, you and generations before you have enjoyed the dependable performance and longevity the Amana brand continues to deliver. *PR *1 E Proudly Assembled in Texas and Tennessee www.amana-ptac.com Heating & Air Conditioning enter LASTS AND LASTS AND LASTS: Amana' brand products are built to last. Comfort and Efficiency This air conditioner can provide significantsavings on your electric bill compared to lower -rated EER units. Model PTC PTC PTC 073G**AXXX 093G**AXXX 123G**AXXX PTC 153G**AXXX PTC PTC 173G**AXXX 0746**AXXX PTC 094G**AXXX PTC 124G**AXXX PTC 154G**AXXX Voltage 230/208 230/208 230/208 230/208 230/208 265 265 265 265 Capacity (BTU/h) 7,700 / 7,700 9,000 / 9,000 12,000 / 11,700 15,000 / 14,700 16,400 / 16,200 7,700 9,000 12,000 14,800 EER 11.7/11.7 11.3/11.5 10.4/10.5 10.0/10.0 9.4 11.7 11.3 10.4 10.0 Model PTH 073G**AXXX PTH 093G**AXXX PTH 123G**AXXX PTH 153G**AXXX PTH 074G**AXXX PTH 094G**AXXX PTH 1246**AXXX PTH 154G**AXXX Voltage 230 / 208 230 / 208 230/ 208 230 /208 265 265 265 265 Capacity (BTU/h) Cooling 7,600/7,600 9,000/9,000 12,000/12,000 14,700/14,700 7,600 9,100 12,000 14,600 Heating 6,800/6,800 8,300/8,100 11,500/11,300 13,800/13,600 6,800 8,300 11,400 13,700 EER 11.7/12.0 12.0/12.0 11.0/11.0 9.7/9.7 11.7 12.0 11.0 9.7 COP 3.4/3.4 3.4/3.4 3.1/3.2 3.0/3.0 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.0 Call us at 800-647-2982 for complete details. www.amana-ptac.com Additional information Before purchasing this appliance, read important information about its estimated annual energy consumption, yearly operating cost, or energy efficiency rating that is available from your retailer. Our continuing commitment to quality products may mean a change in specifications without notice. © 2015 Goodman Company, L.P. Amana is a registered trademark of Maytag Corporation or its related companies and is used under license to Goodman Company, L.P., Houston, TX. USA. All rights reserved. CB-DPTAC4 08-15 4 1111 0 magic-pak GAS HEATING / ELECTRIC COOLING PACKAGED UNITS MGE4 FEATURES • Up to 10.0 EER cooling efficiency • Less than 2% cabinet air leakage • Completely self-contained heating and cooling package • No outside condensing unit • No external refrigerant lines • No remote cooling coil • No separate venting system • Pre -wired and pre -charged • Individual unit control by thermostat • Unit utilities individually metered • Easy service access • Louver color options to match building facade • Internal vent system (direct vent) REFRIGERANT SYSTEM • R410A Refrigerant • High efficiency compressor • Copper tubing with enhanced fin coils HEAT EXCHANGER • Standard aluminized steel heat exchanger • Optional 409 stainless steel heat exchanger CABINET • Fully insulated cabinet for quiet operation BLOWER • Four -speed PSC motor for wide airflow range Permanently lubricated motor for low maintenance and maximum efficiency • Dynamically balanced blower with resilient motor mounts for smooth and quiet operation • Internal washable air filter CONTROLS • Color coded wiring for easy service • Fuse protection on 24V circuit INSTALLATION • Easy to install and service • Louver mounts flush to outside wall Page 1 FORM NO. MGE4-100 (07/2017) WARRANTY 5 year limited warranty on all parts, 10 year warranty on aluminized heat exchanger 20 year warranty on stainless steel heat exchanger. - (ECUM EN STILLWATER )( )( \ \ Monument Sign \ \ \ r 0 FRONT/BACK ELEVATION NOTE: MONUMENT SIGN TO BE LIT BY LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, BOTH SIDES. -FINAL TEXT CONTENT/LAYOUT TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER GRADE r- 0o 0 SECTION CAST STONE CAP W/ 1" OVERHANG -NORTHERN BUFF FINISH 2X6 FRAMING - CONTRACTOR OPTION TO SUBSTITUTE W/ CIP CONCRETE MTL FACED 3/4" PLYWD W/ 1/4" METAL LETTERING ON STANDOFFS - ENSURE STANDOFFS DO NOT INTERFERE W/ SIGNAGE ADHERED CONC. MASONRY VENEER W/ MORTARED JOINTS (ACMV) MTL LATH & SCREED MORTAR SCRATCH COAT CONTINUOUS FLASHING BEDDING SEAL UNDER FLASHING 8" CMU SILL BLOCK, COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT 12" SPLITFACE CMU - FUDGE #309 FINISH CMU BASE GROUT CORES SOLID 3/4" = rt kaas wilson architects Ecumen - Stillwater Concept Monument Si. n Stillwater, MN 3/4" = 1'-0" 105 Unit 3-2 IL Ft S D_50 O 1Level 20'-0" N N CO 151 Unit 0-2 MC 150 Unit 0-3 149 Unit 0-3 SD_502 EGRESS WALL PACK ABOVE DOOR 547-7 5/8" 175-6" 233'-511 /16" 138'-715/16" Stair 199 148 Unit 0-2 MC 152 Unit 0-1 147 Unit 0-1 153 Unit 0-1 146 Unit 0-1 109'-8 3/8" 154 Unit 0-1 145 Unit 0-6 155 156 157 Unit 0-7 Unit 0-7 Unit 0-1 EM, 1958 L J 144 Unit 0-1 MC Dini 184 7_50 SD_502 ISD 503 54'-8" 137 Unit 0-2 MC 136 Unit 0-3 135 Unit 0-3 134 Unit 0-2 MC 158 Unit 0-5 9 is 143 Unit 0-1 142 Unit 0-1 MC Dayroom 185 141 Unit 0-1 140 Unit 0-1 138 139 Unit 0-1 Unit 0-1 RA 311 MC Support 186 163 I Stair 198 MC Activities 187 133 Unit 0-1 pa PATIO WITH DECORATIVE DOWNLIGHT BOLLARDS AT PERIMETER EXT. DEC. WALL SCONCE Fitness r Salon 189 Stair 197 126 Unit 0-1 127 Unit 0-1 128 Unit 0-6 ISE Kitchen 1,169 ft2 a 4 !lining Dir. '- U 1,006 II.- a: ,� ij g 0�� :�i ch� kil Iceiin��— 195C ; 194 EM, 1958 129 Unit 0-6 130 Unit 0-1 131 Unit 0-1 132 Unit 0-4 u 11 120'-10" LI aas wilson architects EGRESS WALL PACK ABOVE DOOR SD_503 0 EGRESS WALL PACK ABOVE DOOR SD_500 E�x Dir- or 19 G Mai ketjng/Disc 5E 4 4 very LI Bistro Lobby 166 li. 213'-51 /2" Edd EGRESS WALL PACK ABOVE DOOR — Community Room Mail 327 IN Ul 323 Unit 1-5 IL SD_502 106 Unit 1-1 IL 107 Unit 3-1 IL S D_501 RECESSED CAN DOWNLIGHTS AT UNDERSIDE OF PORTE-COCHERE (SHEILDED FROM VIEW) 2 SD_500 Key Common IL MC MC Commons Ecumen I� EGRESS WALL PACK ABOVE DOOR SD_501 LO 114 Unit 4-1 112 Unit 3-5 IL 113 Unit 4-1 71'-6" DOWNLIGHT ABOVE GARAGE ENTRY DOOR ISD_501 SD_501 First Floor Plan Ecumen - iliwater Stillwater, MN Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LLF Description Arr. Watts Lum. Lumens 8 AA SINGLE 0.900 MCGRAW GLEON-AF-03-LED-E1-SL4-HSS MOUNT ON 20FT POLE WITH 30IN BASE 166 14749 N.A. SITE GROUND Illuminance 1 BB SINGLE 1.000 MCGRAW GLEON-AF-03-LED-E1-SL2-HSS 166 15052 Illuminance Fc 0.00 1 CC SINGLE 0.900 LUMARK XTOR2B WALL MOUNT AT APPROX 10FT 18.2 2135 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min EAST PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. SITE GROUND Illuminance Fc 1.25 9.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. SOUTH PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. WEST PROPERTY LINE Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. Luminaire Location Summary LumNo Label X Y Z Orient Tilt 24 AA 501197.6 212338.2 22.5 90 0 25 AA 501296.E 212338 22.5 90 0 26 AA 501367.0 212354.2 22.5 90 0 27 AA 501040.8 212432.3 22.5 0 0 28 AA 501093.$ 212549.6 22.5 270 0 29 AA 501209. 212548.5 22.5 270 0 30 AA 501314.3 212456.7 22.5 200.361 0 31 AA 501117. 212354.3 22.5 90 0 32 BB 501464. 212339.9 22.5 76.32 0 33 CC 501379.1 212411.1 10 270 0 GENERAL NOTES: A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION OR COMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL LIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES. B. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PRODUCT. C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ON OBJECTS/SURFACES. 0 n I I I 0 0.0 .o 0.0 01 0.1 0.1 0,1 0.0 0:1 f _ 1111111 2.4 2.5 23 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 3.3 33 3.8 3.9 9:3= ] 6 2.9 3.7 3.3 29 2.5 2.3 2A 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.9 1g= 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 32 37 2.9 2 ] 2.9 2.9 34 3.5 2.9 2:8 2.2 3. ] 3.2 1.6 2.4 2.0 00 0 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 00 00 0.1 0.1 02 0.1 2.8 2.8 2. 3.9 3.3 o. 0.3 0 Zp 0 � 2.8 3.2 2.0 2.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 01 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.2 0.1 01 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.0 7 2.4 3.2 4.6 3.8 0.1 0.1 0.3 j 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 A.3 02 0.2 0.1 01 00 2.0 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 3.9 3.3 3.3 2.8 18 ce.e 9 2.] 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3, 0.2 61 ^0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1-.. \fes'4.�-_ 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 0.0 02 0.2 a, 25 t6 00 0.0 00 o.a 0.0 0 00 0.0 0.I 00 0.0 0.0 Plan View Scale: 1 inch= 45 Ft. ;.." Ka c IN 'lg Mal I C Ilk, JCL # Date Comments Drawn By: SANDY Checked By: ROSS N. Q MM a W qLTTJ `u Scale: AS NOTED i W J J I- (i) -( ) Z W 2 D 0 W PAGE 1OF1 WPLED52 LED 52W Wallpacks. 3 cutoff options. Patent Pending thermal management system. 100,000 hour L70 lifespan. 5 Year Warranty. Color: Bronze Weight: 17.6 lbs FIXTURE TYPE WP 1 LIGHTINC Project: Prepared By: Type: WP1 Date: Driver Info Type: 120V: 208V: 240V: 277V: Input Watts: Efficiency: Constant Current 0.51A 0.33A 0.29A 0.24A 61W 86% LED Info Watts: 52W Color Temp: 5000K (Cool) Color Accuracy: 65 CRI L70 Lifespan: 100,000 Lumens: 5,896 Efficacy: 97 LPW J Technical Specifications Listings UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. IESNA LM -79 & IESNA LM -80 Testing: RAB LED luminaires have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM - 79 and 80, and have received the Department of Energy "Lighting Facts" label. DLC Listed: This product is on the Design Lights Consortium (DLC) Qualified Products List and is eligible for rebates from DLC Member Utilities.This product is on the Design Lights Consortium (DLC) Qualified Products List and is eligible for rebates from DLC Member Utilities. Optical Lumen Maintenance: 100,000 -hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations. Replacement: The WPLED52 replaces 250W HID Wallpacks. BUG Rating: BO U2 G3 LED Characteristics LEDs: Two (2) multi -chip, high -output, long -life LEDs. Color Consistency: 7 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color. Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated color temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377- 2008. Electrical Drivers: Two drivers, constant current, 720mA, Class 2, 100 - 277V, 50 - 60 Hz, 100 - 277VAC .8 Amps. THD: 8.3% at 120V, 11% at 277V Surge Protection: 6kV Construction Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in 40°C ambient temperatures. Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is -40°F/ -40°C. Thermal Management: Cast aluminum Thermal Management system for optimal heat sinking. The WPLED is designed for cool operation, most efficient output and maximum LED life by minimizing LED junction temperature. Housing: Precision die cast aluminum housing, lens frame. Mounting: Die-cast aluminum wall bracket with (5) 1/2" conduit openings with plugs. Two-piece bracket with tether for ease of installation and wiring. Arm: Die-cast aluminum with wiring access plate. Cutoff: Standard (15°) Reflector: Specular vacuum -metallized polycarbonate Gaskets: High temperature silicone. Lens: Tempered glass Finish: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings are formulated for high -durability and long-lasting color, and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. Green Technology: WPLEDs are Mercury and UV free. Other California Title 24: See WPLED52/BL for a 2013 California Title 24 compliant product. Any additional component requirements will be listed in the Title 24 section under technical specifications on the product page. Need help? Tech help line: 888 RAB-1000 Email: sales@rabweb.com Website: www.rabweb.com Copyright © 2014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice Page 1 of 2 PROGRESS LIGHTING: Progress Lighting 701 Millennium Blvd. Greenville, South Carolina 29607 www.progresslighting.com Incandescent Finish THE WATERS OF HIGHLAND PARK Dibs Outdoor Catalog Brushed Antique No. Nickel Bronze Lamping Type -09 P5991 ❑ Outdoor XCL Dimensions (Inches) -20 A B C D P5991 -09 -20 1 (m) 100w 9-3/4 16-1/2 6-1/2 8-1/4 A Specifications: General • Opal etched glass shade: 7-3/4"w., 11- 9/16" ht., 4-13/16" deep • Brushed Nickel -09 plated finish • Antique Bronze -20 powdercoat finish • Steel construction • Companion Bath and Vanity, Chain hung lantern, Close -to -ceiling, Hall and Foyer, Pendant, Post top lantern, Sconce, Wall bracket, Wall lantern, fixtures are available Mounting • Wall mount • Back plate covers a standard 4" hexagonal recessed outlet box • Mounting bracket for outlet box included Electrical • Medium base ceramic sockets • Pre -wired Labeling • cCSAus Wet location listed Rev. 03/13 Page 1 of 1 http://progresslighting.conn/Altlinages/1200/P5991_20.jpg 11/4/2014 BLEDR24N LED bollard with architectural quality and strength at an affordable price point. Cylindrical past with round head. Available in 12, 18 and 24 Watt versions that provide 90, 180, 270 and 360 degree lighting pattems. LED Info Watts: Color Temp: Color Accuracy: L70 Lifespan: LM79 Lumens: Efficacy: 24W 4000K (Neutral) 86 100000 1,203 39 LPW Technical Specifications UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations. LEDs: 6W multi -chip, Tong -life LEDs Driver Info Type: 120V: 208V: 240V: 277V: Input Watts: Efficiency: Constant Current 0.26A 0.18A 0.15A 0.14A 31W 78% Lifespan: 100,000 -hour LED lifespan based on IES LM -80 results and TM -21 calculations Driver: Two Drivers, Constant Current, Class 2, 100-277V, 50160 Hz, 4kV Surge Protection, 100-240VAC 0.3 - 0.15 A, 277VAC 0.03 A. THD: 10.9% at 120V Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in 40°C (104°F) ambient temperatures Cold Weather Starting: Minimum starting temperature is -40°F/ -40°C Thermal Management: Cast aluminum Thermal Management system for optimal heat sinking. The BLED is designed for cool operation, maximum efficiency and long life by minimizing LED junction temperature. Housing: Die-cast aluminum with extruded aluminum bollard shaft Lens: Clear, vandal -resistant polycarbonate Mounting: Four (4) anchor bolts provided for concrete pad mounting. Internal base support has leveling screws. THE WATERS OF HIGHLAND PARKCfe`ed 1110412°14 TYPE XB Color: Bronze Weight: 18.6 lbs 6S. Reflector: Specular polycarbonate Gaskets: High-temperature silicone gaskets seal out moisture Color Consistency: 3 -step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color. Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377-2011 Finish: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings are formulated for high -durability and long-lasting color, and contain no VOC or toxic heavy metals. Green Technology: Mercury and UV free, and RoHS compliant. Polyester powder coat finish formulated without the use of VOC or toxic heavy metals. California Title 24: BLEDR24 complies with 2013 California Title 24 building and electrical codes as a commercial outdoor non -pole -mounted fixture < 30 Watts when used with a photosensor control. Select catalog number PCS900(120V) or PCS900/277 to order a photosensor. RAB LIGHTING n°° ”no snnn TM I Consulting Group, Inc. E NGINEERS P LANNERS D ESIGNERS To: Anne Stanfield, Director of Business Development, ECUMEN From: Jeff Bednar, TOPS, Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist Date: September 14, 2017 Subject: ECUMEN-STILLWATER SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1 FOLLOW-UP TRAFFIC COUNTS Introduction Memorandum SBF No. 01710489 As requested, SRF has completed additional traffic data collection and analysis tasks, as follow-up to the Ecumen-Stillwater Senior Housing Development traffic impact study memorandum by SRF, May 26, 2017. The primary objectives of this traffic study follow-up are to compare traffic counts conducted in early May this year (Before Conditions) to post opening New St. Croix River Crossing Bridge condition traffic counts (After Conditions), in order to determine the impact of the opening of the new bridge. The following information providing the assumptions, methodology, analysis and traffic study follow-up conclusions and recommendations, is offered for your consideration. Data Collection Weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter peak period (7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m.) vehicular turning movement counts were collected at the following study intersections on Tuesday May 2, 2017 (Before Conditions) and Thursday September 7, 2017 (After Conditions): • Myrtle Street (CSAH 12)/Brick Street • Olive Street (CSAH 5)/Brick Street The east and westbound through traffic volumes on Myrtle Street (CSAH 12) and Olive Street (CSAH 5) at Brick Street, during the Before and After condition peak periods (7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m.) are shown in Table 1. The a.m. and p.m. peak period traffic volumes for each condition were combined and the combined average percent reduction, by roadway, was calculated. Additional details and discussion will be included in the Conclusions and Recommendations Summary of this memorandum. Table 1. Before and After New Bridge Opening Conditions Study Area EB and WB Through Traffic Volumes Street Name at Brick Street Before Conditions (May 2017) After Conditions (September 2017) Combined Average Percent Reduction EB & WB Through Traffic Volumes EB & WB Through Traffic Volumes AM Peak Period PM Peak Period AM Peak Period PM Peak Period Myrtle Street (CSAH 12) 911 1130 724 1144 8.5% Olive Street (CSAH 5) 1371 1728 1083 1531 15.7% ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM Anne Stanfield, Director of Business Development, ECUMEN September 14, 2017 ECUMEN - STILLWATER SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOLLOW-UP Page 2 Conclusions and Recommendations Summary Based on the traffic study follow-up traffic counts and analysis, the following summary of conclusions and recommendations is offered for your consideration: 1. Based on the Stillwater Downtown Plan Update - Traffic Impacts Analysis, completed by SRF in November 2016, through traffic volumes on many of the Stillwater area roadways were expected to be reduced with the 2017 opening of the New St. Croix River Bridge and the closing of the existing Stillwater Lift Bridge to vehicular traffic. In the subject traffic study area, through traffic volumes on Olive Street were expected be reduced by 10 percent and on Myrtle Street by five (5) percent, after the new bridge was opened and the existing lift bridge was closed to vehicular. 2. Based on the Before and After condition peak period (7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m.) traffic counts (shown in Table 1), traffic volumes on Olive Street have been reduced by 15.7 percent and on Myrtle Street by 8.5 percent, somewhat more reduction than was predicted. 3. Since the study intersections will operate at acceptable "overall" LOS C or better during the peak hours under the 2022 build Ecumen-Stillwater Senior Housing Development scenario, combined with somewhat more reduction in background through traffic than was predicted, it is concluded that traffic operations at the study intersections may be better than was identified in the Ecumen- Stillwater Senior Housing Development traffic impact study by SRF, May 26, 2017. 4. Therefore, the City of Stillwater may consider the proposed Ecumen-Stillwater Senior Housing Development without concern that it would represent a significant negative traffic impact to the supporting study area roadways. H: \Projects\ 10000\ 10489\TS\Memo\ 10489_Ecumen Development TIS Follow-up Traffic Counts_ 170914.docx Jenn Sundberg From: Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 1:03 To: AM Jenn Sundberg Subject Case cpc/2017-48 Dear Jenn, This is Mike Miskowiak at 314 Hemlock St. I'm writing to voice some concerns regarding the potential construction for the senior living facility. I understand from watching the video that a demand has been established for retaining Stillwater citizens after they've reached a certain age and want to downsize or need assisted living. With the amount of information I was able to gather, I am disappointed in hearing this project is so far moving forward in our neighborhood. Part of the reason we decided on this neighborhood in Stillwater is that it was all single family housing and not integrated with businesses or senior living homes. Going down by Nelsons, where there are these types of facilities, the neighborhoods do not feel as quaint and homey as it does here. I fear that once this project is complete we will end up with a similar "feel" resulting in a declining property values and being a less desirable neighborhood. If a senior living facility isn t considered a multiple family, it still has the look and feel of one. We've just been sunk in with major construction on roads and infrastructure and higher taxes as a result and we are only two years into owning this property. So I believe this project would put us underwater for property value vs taxes and what we owe on the house. Aside from that, one of my favorite things about this neighborhood is the available stargazing, almost like we are out in the country. A large facility will probably require a large lit parking lot, and other areas that are constantly lit- resulting in light pollution. And currently traffic noise is tolerable, as is the amount of traffic. Adding in this large facility ought to result in much higher and more frequent traffic...more noise, and with some newer families moving in, without sidewalks present on Olive could be hazardous. I am also concerned over how their building plans are for height and general mass. I realize there is a 35 foot/2.5 story ordinance, but based on their request I'm concerned they will push that limit. Between the church's idea to expand in 10 years as well as this proposed facility, this neighborhood is going to have a giant display that isn't representative of this neighborhood at all. One member of council stated she feels like a senior facility is necessary, but is also sad that we will lose green space. I can agree with that, but I disagree that this is the right spot. The area on McKusick, which is already zoned for multifamily would be a good spot. A senior living area would be much nicer than general apartments. I understand thy those who are retiring in Stillwater want a nice spot to reside, and that area is nice and would be a waste on condos or apartments. The space behind the church would be better used as it is, or if any changes, a park or garden. In summary, my concerns are: General eyesores Additional years of visible construction Loss of green space Higher traffic and noise Unnecessary light pollution Lowered property value as a result Unnecessary lift of regulations when property of proper zoning exists And to me the cons outweigh the pros. Please reconsider the property selection. Thank you for your time and consideration. -Mike Miskowiak 314 Hemlock St S Sent from my iPhone 1 Jenn Sundber2 From: jim ylinen <> ent: Sunday, October 1, 2 17 7:29 PM To: Jenn Sundberg Cc: Jim object: CPC/2017-48 Ms. Sundberg. CONGRATULATIONS on rubber stamping and fast tracking this proposal. while NEVER taking in consideration the adjoining neighbors concerns. DENSITY; WHY NOT PUT A 1,000 UNITS ON THIS SMALL PIECE OF BUILDABLE LAND. YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO PUT 15 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THIS PARCEL, SO WHY NOT PUT 10 TIMES WITH SENIOR LIVING!!! PROXIMITY TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, EVEN THE ECUMEN REPRESENTATIVE, MS. STANFIELD. COULDN'T ANSWER HOW CLOSE THEIR PROPERTIES WERE TO EXISTING HOMES. PLEASE CUT THE SIZE AND SCOPE, AND MOVE THIS MONSTER BUILDING OFF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE! Please acknowledge that you have received this. Thank -you, Barb and Jim Ylinen 201 Deer Path Stillwater, Mn. 55082 1 From: Ryan Collins To: #bbi Wittman Subject: Fwd: Tonight's Meeting: Case No. 2017-48, Senior Living Final PUD Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 3:19:14 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Michele Livermore <> Date: October 11, 2017 at 11:15:35 AM CDT To: "ryanjcollins@hotmail.com" <ryanjcollins@hotmail.com>, "jenna.fletcher@tpl.org" <jenna.fletcherntpl.org>, "seanhade@comcast.net" <seanhade@comcast.net> "eric.fsciggmail.com" <eric.fsci@gmail.com>, "mikekocon@aol.com" <milcekocon@aol.com>, "afsundbergAyahoo.com" <afsundberg@yahoo.com>, "dmenikheimAstillwater.mn.us" <dmenikheim@stillwater.mn.us> Subject: Tonight's Meeting: Case No. 2017-48, Senior Living Final PUD We will be unable to attend tonight's Planning Commission Meeting. Since we cannot speak at the meeting, will you please take the following into consideration: As Deer Path residents whose property is adjacent to this project, we have previously spoken out about our displeasure of such a large structure & additional traffic being approved in our residential neighborhood. At tonight's meeting will you please consider this as you look at Ecumen's plan for the structure: They refer to the style of the building as "urban". Massive size, flat roof, the brick they have chosen looks like concrete: In our opinion, this style does not fit in our neighborhood where the homes are 30+ to 100+ years old! We understand that everyone has a different taste in design, but wouldn't it make sense to put in a structure that went along with the existing homes? Attached is a snapshot of a housing structure in the Boutwell's Landing community to give you an idea of what we are trying to convey wouldn't you agree that something more like the pictured building's facade would fit into our established single-family neighborhood better than an "urban" design? The Sr. Living facility will have high visibility along Myrtle Street. We feel that "urban" will stick out like a sore thumb and be so inconsistent with the wonderful views in our historic town. Do you want "urban" to be the first landmark that visitors and residents see when they are driving along Myrtle towards our picturesque downtown? Thank you for your consideration, Michele & Fred Livermore 181 Deer Path Stillwater, MN 55082 October 8, 2017 From: 201 Deer Path, Stillwater MN Barbara and James Ylinen Re: Case #CPC/2017-48 Proposed Senior Living Facility City Council and Planning Commission, On this gorgeous October day I walked the path behind my home, in our beautiful residential neighborhood of Stillwater I sat in my back yard, soaking in the sunshine and gazing upward across my back yard. The sky was blue and the trees and leaves shone gold and green and red in the autumn sun. Sadly, it was bittersweet. This may never be my view again, the beauty and solitude, the blue sky behind my home, the peace, nature at its peak. Instead, I will be staring up into the windows of an enormous, ugly, disfigured box -like structure in my back yard. Many eyes will be staring back down upon me. This senior living structure obviously does not belong in our little residential neighborhood, it is hideously out of place. It will leave us devoid of a view, of the beauty and peace and privacy that we have enjoyed for 33 years. Our property value will plummet. We cannot afford for that to happen, but it seems to be of no consequence to the city of Stillwater or the developers. Politics and money seem to have priority. We have objected, in fact we have raised objections and concerns and questions of every sort, for months. We have spoken of traffic, nature, noise, water, odors, disturbances, zoning, building appearance, placement, height, obstruction of our view, invasions of privacy, We have raised our voices and asked to be heard, over and over. We have written and emailed and made calls and and attended meetings. We have observed the political system at work in our beloved city. We have been disappointed. We have come to feel a sort of helplessness, seeing our concerns tossed aside, as our input has fallen on predominantly deaf ears. We cannot stop the storm that is looming, and yet we will continue to voice our concerns until the end. We object on so many levels, and have made this clear. The integrity and beauty of our neighborhood and our city will be forever compromised by the erection of such an imposing, ugly structure in the middle of a residential neighborhood. So, perhaps it is the last autumn day that I will ever sit in the privacy of my back yard soaking in the sunshine, and walk the peaceful path behind my yard and absorb the beauty surrounding me here. If that is the case, the city has truly failed its hard working, tax paying, contributing citizens in our neighborhood. Please distribute this email to the appropriate City Council and Planning Commission members. Please pay us the courtesy of taking the time to review the letters, emails and verbal concerns raised by the Deer Path and surrounding neighbors during these past months, prior to finalizing this plan. I submit this letter with a heavy heart. Respectfully, Barbara Ylinen 201 Deer Path Planning Commission — DRAFT MINUTES October 11, 2017 Street South. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, property owner and Anne Stanfield, Ecumen, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Anne Stanfield, representing Ecumen, and Pastor Dale Stiles, representing Our Savior's Lutheran Church (OSLC), have submitted an application to develop a 15.01 acre site located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West. The City approved a Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this development in August 2017. Ecumen will be the owner and operator of the proposed Senior Care Living Facility and OSLC will continue to own their existing church structure on the site, which is proposed to be expanded in the future. The site would be developed in two phases: 1) Ecumen Stillwater, a 143 -unit senior living building, all parking, drive and pedestrian improvements for the two uses; and 2) a future Our Savior's Lutheran Church expansion. Ms. Wittman discussed the proposed plan in regard to parking, landscaping, covenants, pedestrian and traffic improvements, massing of the building, and signage. She summarized City staff comments and developers' revisions to the plan since concept approval was granted in August. A letter from a neighbor was received opposing the architectural design. City staff met with Washington County regarding traffic patterns which need to be discussed further. Ms. Wittman summarized written concerns received from neighbors: letters were received from Jim and Barb Ylinen, 201 Deer Path, regarding traffic, preservation of natural resources, noise, smells, and obstruction of views; and from Mike Miskowiak, 314 Hemlock, regarding loss of green space, traffic, noise, and light pollution. Staff recommends approval of the Final PUD, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat, and SUP with 12 conditions. Commissioner Siess asked who reviewed the geotechnical engineering services report. City Planner Wittman responded that Public Works Director Shawn Sanders reviewed the report. His comments and two suggested requirements are listed in the staff report. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Anne Stanfield, Ecumen, explained the intent to create a shared campus to support intergenerational programming between the residents of the senior living facility and Our Savior's Lutheran Church. Developers are prepared to comply with the staff -recommended conditions and have responded to neighborhood feedback. Mindy Michael, Kaas Wilson Architects, reviewed the current design of the project with images indicating revisions since concept approval. She emphasized the demand for senior housing. Chairman Collins asked if a pitched roof was considered so the structure is not so boxy. Ms. Michael stated they are bound by the height restriction of 35 feet. A pitched roof would preclude three stories, thus they are planning a flat roof. Chairman Collins asked about the plan for screening on the west side. Ms. Michael stated they propose planting trees as large as feasible. They would be willing to relocate more of the proposed trees to the west side if they would fit. Commissioner Siess asked about the chemical -type odor found in the soil, of undetermined source, noted in the geotechnical report done in March. Ms. Michael stated no further testing was done; it was believed to smell somewhat like fertilizer but it was not strong, it was mentioned in case it needed to be investigated further. Commissioner Siess asked Ms. Wittman if the City were to investigate it, what would happen? Ms. Wittman replied it would be an untraditional request and she has not dealt with that sort of request before. Page 5 of 9 Planning Commission — DRAFT MINUTES October 11, 2017 Ms. Stanfield added the smell is in an area of poor soils where there will not be any building activity. They have avoided any disruption in that area. It only appeared in that one location. Commissioner Siess noted there are a lot of water pockets in Stillwater. On page 20, the geotechnical report discussed some water concerns. She asked if engineers looked at how neighboring areas have dealt with with water. Ms. Stanfield replied they investigated only the proposed site, no additional properties. Anecdotally, when taking the photo from 181 Deer Path, she did see their backyard was quite moist and they said they have quite a bit of drainage going into the pond north of their house. Commissioner Siess remarked there is a lot of discussion about senior housing but not about affordable senior housing. She asked if this facility will be considered high end or affordable. Ms. Stanfield replied that Ecumen has a range of housing from affordable to market rate senior housing. Their intent for this project is not HUD -subsidized but they want it to be financially accessible to a broad range of potential residents. Barbara Ylinen, 201 Deer Path, spoke in opposition, stating that she and her husband have lived in their home for 33 years. This enormous facility is all she will see from her windows and her backyard. The proposed modification is not significant enough to be an improvement. Commissioner Siess asked Ms. Ylinen to elaborate on odors she mentioned in her letter. Ms. Ylinen replied she was talking about the odors from an industrial kitchen which are a real concern. Dan Zenk, 261 Deer Path, asked how close the proposed building is to his property line. City Planner Wittman replied the distance is 70 feet. Mr. Zenk stated he planted all the trees because the church reconstruction resulted in light shining in his windows. He is concerned if the path is expanded, it will take out trees. Ms. Wittman replied the development will not be taking out trees on the western property line. The trail itself will stay as is. The east part of the trail will be a substrate that is placed and then planted with grass so a fire truck may drive on it. No changes are proposed to the westerly portion of the trail. Mr. Zenk continued that he does not want to see that large a building that close to his backyard. It will affect property values, cast more light, generate noise and cause fire trucks to be literally in his backyard. He also is concerned about safety and adding to Deer Path traffic volumes. Kyle Brandvik, 113 Brick Street South, voiced concerns about property values, green space, traffic, pollution, noise, and the impact on lifestyles. She questioned the notification about the neighborhood meetings, which seemed timed by the developer for holiday weekends. She has not seen renderings of what the buildings will look like and feels the neighbors are not aware of what is going on. Every time she comes there is a different plan. She added that there is a lot of concern about property values in the neighborhood. She doesn't question the value of an assisted living facility but feels it is not the right place. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kocon noted if the site were developed as single family, with over 60 homes, that would consume a lot of green space with roads, buildings and driveways. He feels the neighbors' concerns are legitimate but it would probably be more impactful if it were a single family development. He is not diminishing traffic, light and privacy concerns. He feels the staff report is very comprehensive. Page 6 of 9 Planning Commission — DRAFT MINUTES October 11, 2017 Chairman Collins agreed that the staff report was thorough and addressed a lot of his concerns. To try to protect the views as much as possible, he would like to see the biggest trees possible planted on the western side, and would also like to see downlit and shielded lighting. With these additional conditions, he feels the development fits and will be a benefit to the community. Commissioner Fletcher said compared to a development of single family homes, this PUD with 50% open space is really compelling. Dense living takes a while to get used to but it is the wave of the future. She is in favor of the proposal with conditions discussed. Commissioner Siess said the developer and the Commission can try harder to accommodate the concerns. Fast growing trees die, so the developer should look at trees that will be long-lived. The building mass, especially in proximity to 261 Deer Path, needs to be re-examined. If the architects can do anything with a pitched roof, they owe it to the nearby homeowners. From a planning perspective, the City needs to consider what will be done with these structures after the baby boom is over. She encouraged everyone to consider this issue including the City, in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan update. She stated there are people who are looking at that from other perspectives, low income housing, disability housing, but City codes don't allow that right now. Commissioner Hansen noted that there is no way to know what the population of senior housing residents will be in the future but Stillwater is so deficient in that type of space now that it could probably be doubled and still be deficient. A certain density and number of units is needed to make these projects financially feasible. With a gable roof, it would not have that extra floor. He doesn't believe a gable roof would be appropriate on a three story building. He recognized that the building is massive but it is set far back. He is less concerned about traffic issues than before the traffic study. He is in favor of the project and thinks the applicant has addressed many of the issues. He realizes that the homeowners on Deer Path oppose the project. Commissioner Lauer said he favors the project. Regarding the life cycle of the building, it may become a destination for the whole metro area. He feels the proposal makes a lot of sense. City Planner Wittman acknowledged that the City and County need to look at the Olive/Brick/Myrtle system to design improvements as part of a future conversation with the Commission. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Lauer, to recommend that the City Council approve Case No. 2017-48, Final PUD, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit for the properties located at 1616 Olive Street and 114 Brick Street, with the 12 conditions recommended by staff, and the following additional conditions: 13) all lighting shall be downlit and shielded; 14) the landscaping plan shall be amended to provide coniferous trees on the west and east property lines, to provide for screening from all adjacent properties; 15) the applicant shall be responsible for installing a stop sign on Ramsey Street, in both directions. Motion passed 5-1, with Commissioner Siess voting nay. Case No. 2017-49: Consideration of a Variance to the front yard setback and the expansion of a legally non -conforming structure on the property located at 204 Birchwood Drive North. Genevieve Schulze, property owner and Cynthia Polzin, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Cynthia Polzin is requesting a 9' variance to the required 30' Front Yard Setback for the construction of a vestibule on a legal, non -conforming home. The home, permitted by the City prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, has a front yard setback Page 7 of 9 DRAFT CITY OF STILLWATER PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING October 23, 2017 Present: Chairwoman Linda Amrein, Commissioners Scott Christensen, Rob McGarry, Sam Nelson and Sandy Snellman; Council Representative Mike Polehna Absent: Commissioners David Brandt and Bill McGlynn Staff present: Public Works Superintendent Tim Moore, City Planner Abbi Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of September 25, 2017 meeting minutes Motion by Commissioner Snellman, seconded by Commissioner Nelson, to approve the September 25, 2017 meeting minutes. All in favor, 5-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. ACTION ITEMS Ecumen Planned Unit Development City Planner Wittman explained that Ecumen and Our Savior's Lutheran Church (OSLO), have submitted an application to develop a 15.01 acre site located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West. A two phased development is proposed: 1) a 145 -unit senior living structure and 2) a future expansion of OSLO. There are no future parks proposed for this property in the City's Parks and Trail Plan. The existing City trail will be modified slightly so that the Fire Department can access the development, and there will be an internal pathway connecting to the City's trail system. Staff is recommending a Park Dedication fee of $55,500 and a Trail Dedication fee of $41,375, to be paid prior to release of the final plat. Ms. Wittman further stated that the Parks and Trail Plan includes two future improvements in this area: 1) an on -street shared bike route along Brick Street and 2) a future trail to extend along Olive Street. Staff is not proposing that the developer do either of these at this time. Commissioner Snellman remarked that a lot of the parcel is wetland. Ms. Wittman responded that wetlands encompass the northern one-third of the property. The developer is proposing a 50' buffer. The corner of the building will extend into the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — DRAFT MINUTES October 23, 2017 structural setback, but the Middle St. Croix Water Management Organization uses buffer "averaging" so this will be allowed. Chairwoman Amrein asked how long the church has considered developing the property and how they decided on a senior living facility. Joel Frost, OSLC treasurer, replied that almost two years ago, the owners of the radio station approached OSLO about selling the property and and gave the church the option to bid on the property. OSLO decided it would not be in a position to purchase the property, however the only access to the radio station property would be off Brick Street because OSLO owned property on three sides. OSLO set up a task force to determine what would be the best use of the property. The idea for independent/assisted living came out of the task force. OSLO reached out to Ecumen and asked if they would be interested in looking at the property. City Planner Wittman stated that another 1,200 senior housing units will be needed in the Stillwater area by 2025. This facility and the other one being developed will serve about 1/3 of the demand. Anne Stanfield of Ecumen added that there currently is no senior housing in Stillwater other than nursing homes. This development will allow people to stay in Stillwater as they age. Commissioner Christensen stated he is not against the project but is concerned about taking Brick Street out of the master trail plan. Ms. Wittman replied that Brick Street is not being taken out of the master trail plan. However, the Comprehensive Plan indicated that even with future traffic projections on Brick Street, the shared bike route wasn't necessary to be implemented but it was included in the staff report for the Commission to consider. Commissioner Christensen questioned whether Brick would be wide enough for the shared bike route. Commissioner Snellman remarked that intersections on both ends of Brick can be challenging and she is nervous about adding more traffic. City Planner Wittman stated that as part of its reconstruction project in 2018, Washington County is willing to put in a dedicated turn lane onto and off of Brick, but it would remove all on -street parking for two blocks. Brick has been the subject of many traffic studies which indicate that traffic counts do not yet warrant changes. However, Brick is one of the areas that will be studied as part of the Comprehensive Plan update that is currently beginning. Ms. Stanfield added that SRF did an independent traffic study for Ecumen which indicated the development will not cause significant increases in wait times because senior housing doesn't generate the same traffic volumes as other developments. Page 2 of 5 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting — DRAFT MINUTES October 23, 2017 Commissioner Christensen reiterated concerns about bike traffic on Brick Street. Ms. Wittman responded that Brick was never intended to have its own bike lane - it was intended to be a shared bike route. She went on to explain that Washington County has indicated that if any sidewalk improvements are part of the 2018 reconstruction project, it will be on the south side of Hwy 5 (Olive Street). The question is whether or not the Commission would request the developer to paint in the shared route and provide signage, which would come out of the Park and Trail Dedication fee. Commissioner McGarry asked if the fees being considered are consistent with other similar projects. Ms. Wittman stated they are. Commissioner Nelson asked if the Commission says it does not want this money going to painting the road or putting up signage, but saved for the parks budget, will that equate to next year's budget being reduced by that much? Superintendent Moore replied no, the Park and Trail Dedication funds are in a separate budget. Commissioner Christensen said that Brick is one of the busiest biking routes in Stillwater. He feels that the shared bike route will be a safety issue and that there is room for a dedicated bike lane on the west side. Motion by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner McGarry, to recommend that the City Council accept the Park and Trail Dedication fees as recommended by staff for the Ecumen Planned Unit Development. All in favor, 5-0. Revised 2018 Capital Improvement Budget Public Works Superintendent Moore reviewed the revised 2018 Capital Improvement Budget. At the request of the Commission, funds were shifted from other areas to Pioneer Park restrooms. $150,000 has been added to the $320,000 that was already budgeted, for a total of $470,000 for the restrooms. He will discuss plans for updating the restrooms at the next meeting. Commissioner Nelson said he gets asked why the City is purchasing more park properties if it cannot maintain existing parks. He asked if some of the park dedication funds may go toward maintenance. Mr. Moore said that as of October 15, 2015 there was $146,480 in the Park Dedication Fund and $520 in the Trail Dedication Fund. Commissioner Christensen pointed out that this year, park and trail dedication fees came in from several new developments. He asked what the Trail Dedication money was spent on. Mr. Moore said he will find out the current balance in the Park and Trail Dedication Funds and inform the Commission. Council Representative Polehna noted that the Council has asked for $2 million each, from state and federal legislators, to stabilize the riverfront. He acknowledged Page 3 of 5 RESOLUTION CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ECUMEN STILLWATER/OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH CASE NO. 2017-48 WHEREAS, Anne Stanfield of Ecumen and Pastor Dale Stiles of Our Savior's Lutheran Church ("applicants") have submitted an application for the development of the properties located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West, legally described on Exhibit A, and are requesting approval of: 1) Final Planned Unit Development for the Current Phase: Ecumen Stillwater 2) Preliminary Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church, as depicted on Exhibit B 3) Final Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church 4) Special Use Permit for Senior Living Facility in the RA, One -Family Residential Zoning District WHEREAS, on October 11, 2017 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the associated requests and, upon hearing testimony from the public, recommended conditional approval; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2017 the Park and Recreation Commission discussed the associated requests and recommended conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2017 the City Council held a public hearing on the requests and found them to be compatible with the neighborhood and consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinances, Subdivision Ordinances, and Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the Preliminary Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church, as depicted on Exhibit B, with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the release of the Final Plat from the City, the applicant shall: a. Submit for review and approval by the City Attorney copies of: Case No. 2017-48 Preliminary Plat CC: 11/7/2017 Page 2 of 4 i. All covenants and scenic and conservation easements relating to the provision, use and maintenance of common open space including wetlands and wetland buffer areas. ii. Conservation, drainage and utility easements, determined and found acceptable by the City of Stillwater and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. iii. A cross access, use and maintenance agreement for all shared parking and driveway areas. b. Enter into an agreement with the City for access, use and maintenance of the City owned trail to ensure upgrades and year-round fire department access is achieved. c. Shall be responsible for payment of all required park and trail fee -in -lieu, as determined by the Park and Recreation Commission. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota this 7th day of November, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Case No. 2017-48 Preliminary Plat CC: 11/7/2017 Page 3 of 4 Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1616 OLIVE STREET: THAT PT NW1/4-SE1/4 & THAT PT BLK 16 MCKINSTRY & SEELEY'S 2ND ADD & THAT PT VAC OLIVE ST LYING NLY OF N LN OLIVE ST EST IN 1916 LYING W OF W LN BRICK ST IN SINCLAIRS ADD LYING SLY OF SLY LN MYRTLE ST DESC IN DOC 346309 & LYING ELY SLY NELY & ELY OF FOLL DESC LN COM AT NW COR SD MCKINSTRY & SEELEY'S 2ND ADD ALSO BEING NW COR OF SW1/4-SE1/4 SD SEC 29 THN S01DEG00'05"E BRG WACO CORSYS SZ ALG W LN SD SEC 29 & ALSO W LN SD SW1/4-SE1/4 292.06FT TO N LN SD OLIVE ST THN N89DEG19'36"E ALG SD N LN 724FT TO POB THN N00DEG40'24"W 145FT THN NLY ALG TCRV CONC TO W RAD 580FT CENT ANG 12DEG29'53" 126.52FT THN N79DEG17'55"E 133FT THN N18DEG5125"W 191.13FT THN N29DEG55'38"W 137.04FT THN N10DEG31'47"E 508.18FT TO SD SLY LN MYRTLE ST & SD LN THERE TERM EXC THAT PT SD BLK 16 DESC AS FOLL BEG AT SE COR DEERPATH ACCRD TO REC PLAT THN NOODEG40'24"W PLAT BRG ALG ELY LN SD DEERPATH 145FT THN NLY 76.51FT ALG TCRV CONC TO W RAD 580FT CENT ANG 07DEG33'27" THN N79DEG17'55"E NTANG TO CRV 140.17FT THN S12DEG42'06"E 115.22FT THN SOODEG40'24"E 133FT THN S89DEG19'36"W 157FT TO POB ALSO EXC THAT PT OF N1/2-SE1/4 SD SEC 29 DESC AS FOLL BEG AT PT ON S LN SD N1/2-SE1/4 1081.51FT W OF SE COR SD N1/2-SE1/4 SD PT BEING NE COR BLK 15 MCKINSTRY & SEELEY'S ADD THN W ALG S LN SD N1/2-SE1/4 510.43FT TO PT THN N & PARL WITH W LN SD BRICK ST 309.5FT THN E & PARL WITH S LN SD N1/2-SE1/4 510.43FT TO W LN SD BRICK ST THN S ALG SD W LN 309.5FT TO POB SUBJ TO EASE SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 030 RANGE 020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 114 BRICK STREET: PT N1/2-SE1/4 BEG AT PT ON S LN OF SD N1/2-SE1/4 DIST OF 1081.51FT W OF SE COR SD TRCT SD PT BEING THE NE COR OF BLK 15 MCKINSTRY & SEELEYS ADD THN W ON S LN SD TRACT DIST OF 510.43FT TO A PT THN N & PARL WITH W LN OF BRICK ST DIST OF 309.5FT THN E & PARL WITH S LN OF SD TRACT DIST OF 510.43FT TO W LN OF BRICK ST THN S ALG W LN OF BRICK ST DIST OF 309.5FT TO BEG SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 030 RANGE 020 H PRELIMINARY PLAT ~OF- ECUMEN STILLWATERJOO [WITH OVERLAY OF PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTSI LEGAL DESCRIPTION *SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FINAL PLAT, IT'S VERY LENGTHY* wet - DENOTES EDGE OF WETLAND • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT. O DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 44125. ALL MONUMENT REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2" INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 44125. ZONING & SETBACK INFORMATION - TOTAL AREA = 656,946 sq.ft. (15.08 acres) - PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED: RA - ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - PROPOSED ZONING: RA - ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Detail: No Scale C�- West M.N•t/e t o. 1 West ,., live Street SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 20 ACRE LAND SURVEYING 10 11 12 13 Blaine,MN Blaine, MN 55449 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: T- 10.00-.1 — 10.00-. 1 r- 10.00 -10.00 !r r- 10.00 L_L.— I BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE SOUTH LINE OF THE N1/2 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 29, TWP. 30, RNG. 20, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N00°42'04"W. 7-1 7 118 1 9 120 / / / / \ SAVIOR'S LUT FOUND RLS#10938, \ 5 A Cc' s,�� / vy �cE?P 01 X. 55 IRAN c N H 60 RESOLUTION EXHIBIT B GRAPHIC SCALE 30 60 120 240 \ i L \c\TION \ \ ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. \ \ \ 1 kef 1 EXISTING POND _-N WL=856.2 l HV1�L 8€O.5 / e,14 • f*tiOGs 1 1 1 ``I. I I\ -r A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 /\ .I .I 1 L. .I 1 I / / L1- • • L 1 , L1J \ WALKING PATH FIRE ACCESS LANE, 20' OVERALL WIDTH. GRASS WITHIN FIRE ACCESS LANE LIMITS MUST BE'GRASSPAVE`, SEE ARCH FOUND \ LS#10938 15' BUFFER (INCREASED FOR AVERAGING (2,084 SF) 103.5' ---- COW 03.5'- CONC. WALK, TYP. 20' BUFFER BUILDING SETBACK -t CONC. WALK, TYP, PROPOSED WALKABLE GARDEN AREA O DECORATIVE CONC. PATIO WITH OUTDOOR SEATING ANDA" ORNA1GIENTAt STYLI-- — I FENCE. SEE DETAILS (4) 'HITCHING POST' STYLE BIKE RACKS (8 SPACES), SURFACE MOUNT PER MANUF. SPECS. .') \ \ 'e''\ \ '44) i \ \ 60 -.1- \ \ \ 50.02 80'00 A04I56,2711 IS POR''E COCHERE / BUILDING ©VERHAN COLUMNS, / yl •A�, 1t • Ie21e 141' iii `J;� IIT 1i��LifY MA eN a■Plur91■■n , CONC. WALK, TYP. ACCESSIBLE PED RAMP PER ADA AND CITY STANDARDS DROP-OFF /VALET PULL IN CONC. WALK, TYR \ 15' BUFFER (REL AVERAGING (1,6 N'11% 20' SUFFESETBACK R WI MATCH EXISTING BIT. WALKING PATH — UNDERGROUND /� PARKING LOT 163.8 — 0 Si..) 1 1 T' ENTRACNE / EXIT PRELIMINARY LOCATION OF INFILTRATION BASIN 2• / 1.• / CONC. WALK, TYP. BIT. PAVEMENT, TYP. \ �1 \AL 133 26.0' SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL, 1 N 1 OI z _/ ,\ \, / 60 L 0 �p�"�tODI_R12E -r I =FOLIO RLS# NOT LEGIBI�— 10S,1E 1401 S82o10,29"E D. NEW PROPERTY 19 N82° 10' --So. lin 74"W MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER, TYP. C. WALK,TYP.. PROOF OF PARKING 11 SPACES 498.660 BIT. PAVEMENT, —.—' TYR ‘,.%:‘ , A , P 1„/ N88° 30' 49.07"W PROPOSED 0 0) 09/13/17', FOR CITY REVIEW, NOT CHECKED BY COUNTY SURVEYOR 0I 1 11 1 1 O SJIO CO M W C) <(- W U7 �� FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE • CO MATCH EXISTING PARKING LOT PVMT, TYP. -- I I� I r` 100.00--r�IrFZ `1' c., r`;,`I`, i 4 0 r o,_,rte, ' �w `/. v. ci. 1 -T6TAL I -k EX =-184-,8 300.00 ' -- WALKWAY 8 LAWN AREA ,NOJACENT TO EXISTING PLAYGROUND, FOR MULTI -GENERATIONAL MINGLING PROPERTY MONUMENT SIGN 400.00 _1 1' s , (;,',1. rC, S.ECHl1Fd�FT ES \ \ . f. SE corner Lot 15-, CI\Users\erIc,j\❑neDrIve\CAD-1D\17076stIllwater-Senlor-Kaas\dwg\17076pLat_recover,dwg 9/13/2017 6136129 PM CDT (0 (D ✓ S89°51'11"E 1 A 1 r- .• -,- /\ 1 1 • , r- ,- -1- r\ r- r- r 1111 1-- •• 1 1 1 1 1 v 1-- 1 1-! I-- I-- I 1 1 L.- .J 1 .. L. I V L- ./ 1 1, L.. L- 1 /. .• A 1 1 •••• r- 1 I -11 /1 I --I 1\11 1 -\ I . ./ . ,-, . I 1. 1 \ ./ . ./ 1 r 661.25 (0 (0 z • 50 L_ r•• A A A .• 1•f , \ I\,1 - -So. line of N1/2 of of Sec. x, T.x, R.x -1081.50- N88°30'57"W r-\, SE1/4 .r', \_/ , NORTH 7- -- SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR ECUMEN STILLWATER/OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH CASE NO. 2017-48 WHEREAS, Anne Stanfield of Ecumen and Pastor Dale Stiles of Our Savior's Lutheran Church ("applicants") have submitted an application for the development of the properties located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West, legally described on Exhibit A, and are requesting approval of: 1) Final Planned Unit Development for the Current Phase: Ecumen Stillwater 2) Preliminary Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church 3) Final Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/Our Savior's Lutheran Church, as depicted on Exhibit B 4) Special Use Permit for Senior Living Facility in the RA, One -Family Residential Zoning District WHEREAS, on October 11, 2017 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the associated requests and, upon hearing testimony from the public, recommended conditional approval; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2017 the Park and Recreation Commission discussed the associated requests and recommended conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2017 the City Council held a public hearing on the requests and found them to be compatible with the neighborhood and consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinances, Subdivision Ordinances, and Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the Final Plat for Ecumen Stillwater/ Our Savior's Lutheran Church, as depicted on Exhibit B. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota this 7th day of November, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: J. Thomas McCarty, Acting City Clerk Exhibit A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1616 OLIVE STREET: THAT PT NW1/4-SE1/4 & THAT PT BLK 16 MCKINSTRY & SEELEY'S 2ND ADD & THAT PT VAC OLIVE ST LYING NLY OF N LN OLIVE ST EST IN 1916 LYING W OF W LN BRICK ST IN SINCLAIRS ADD LYING SLY OF SLY LN MYRTLE ST DESC IN DOC 346309 & LYING ELY SLY NELY & ELY OF FOLL DESC LN COM AT NW COR SD MCKINSTRY & SEELEY'S 2ND ADD ALSO BEING NW COR OF SW1/4-SE1/4 SD SEC 29 THN S01DEG00'05"E BRG WACO CORSYS SZ ALG W LN SD SEC 29 & ALSO W LN SD SW1/4-SE1/4 292.06FT TO N LN SD OLIVE ST THN N89DEG19'36"E ALG SD N LN 724FT TO POB THN NOODEG40'24"W 145FT THN NLY ALG TCRV CONC TO W RAD 580FT CENT ANG 12DEG29'53" 126.52FT THN N79DEG17'55"E 133FT THN N18DEG51'25"W 191.13FT THN N29DEG55'38"W 137.04FT THN N10DEG31'47"E 508.18FT TO SD SLY LN MYRTLE ST & SD LN THERE TERM EXC THAT PT SD BLK 16 DESC AS FOLL BEG AT SE COR DEERPATH ACCRD TO REC PLAT THN NOODEG40'24"W PLAT BRG ALG ELY LN SD DEERPATH 145FT THN NLY 76.51FT ALG TCRV CONC TO W RAD 580FT CENT ANG 07DEG33'27" THN N79DEG17'55"E NTANG TO CRV 140.17FT THN S12DEG42'06"E 115.22FT THN SOODEG40'24"E 133FT THN S89DEG19'36"W 157FT TO POB ALSO EXC THAT PT OF N1/2-SE1/4 SD SEC 29 DESC AS FOLL BEG AT PT ON S LN SD N1/2-SE1/4 1081.51FT W OF SE COR SD N1/2-SE1/4 SD PT BEING NE COR BLK 15 MCKINSTRY & SEELEY'S ADD THN W ALG S LN SD N1/2-SE1/4 510.43FT TO PT THN N & PARL WITH W LN SD BRICK ST 309.5FT THN E & PARL WITH S LN SD N1/2-SE1/4 510.43FT TO W LN SD BRICK ST THN S ALG SD W LN 309.5FT TO POB SUBJ TO EASE SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 030 RANGE 020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 114 BRICK STREET: PT N1/2-SE1/4 BEG AT PT ON S LN OF SD N1/2-SE1/4 DIST OF 1081.51FT W OF SE COR SD TRCT SD PT BEING THE NE COR OF BLK 15 MCKINSTRY & SEELEYS ADD THN W ON S LN SD TRACT DIST OF 510.43FT TO A PT THN N & PARL WITH W LN OF BRICK ST DIST OF 309.5FT THN E & PARL WITH S LN OF SD TRACT DIST OF 510.43FT TO W LN OF BRICK ST THN S ALG W LN OF BRICK ST DIST OF 309.5FT TO BEG SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 030 RANGE 020 ECUMEN STILLWATER / OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURC KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Ecumen, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, fee owner and Our Savior's Lutheran Church, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, to wit: A portion of the following described land: (Final legal description to be prepared by a licensed Land Surveyor) All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1%of SE %) of Section Twenty-nine (29), Township Thirty (30) North of Range Twenty (20) West lying West of Brick Street *LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHOULD SAY SOUTH OF MYRTLE) and that part of Block Fifteen *McKinstry and Seeley's Addition to Stillwater* (PLAT NAME ADDED TO LEGAL) and Block Sixteen (15 and 16) *SHOULD BE REMOVED* of McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: Commencing at the Southeast (SE) corner of Block Fifteen (15) of said McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, also being the intersection of Brick Street and Olive Street; thence West for a distance of Four Hundred (400) feet along the North line of Olive Street to a point; thence North parallel with the West line of Brick Street for a distance of One Hundred sixty-five (165) feet to a point; thence East for a distance of Three Hundred (300) feet to a point; thence North parallel to the West line of Brick Street for a distance of Ninety (90) feet; thence East a distance of One Hundred (100) feet to the West line of Brick Street; thence South along the West line of Brick Street for a distance of Two Hundred Fifty-five (255) feet more or less to the point of beginning. And All of Block Fifteen (15) of McKinstry and Seeley's Addition, and the East one hundred (100) Feet of Block Sixteen (16) of McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, according to the plats on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Washington County, Minnesota. And That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter (N'/2of SE%) of section Twenty-nine (29), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West, and Block Sixteen (16) of McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, lying South of Myrtle Street, West of Brick Street, North of Olive Street and East of the following described line: Beginning at point on the North line of West Olive Street, which is Seven Hundred Forty (740) feet East of the present West line of the said City of Stillwater, which is also the West line of Block Twenty-nine (29), McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition; thence North 5° 0' East for Five Hundred Sixty-nine (569) feet; thence North 77° 50' West for Sixty-nine (69) feet; thence North 10° 6' East for Six Hundred Eighty-one (681) feet to the South line of West Myrtle Street; Except the East One Hundred (100) feet of Block Sixteen (16) and except that portion sold to St. Croix Broadcasting Company by Warranty Deed recorded in Book 169 of Deeds, page 11. And That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29 Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota and that part of Block 16 of McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater according to the perfected plat of the City of Stillwater as recorded on June 3, 1878 in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, and that part of Olive Street according to the plat of said McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater lying northerly of the north line of Olive Street as located and established by Lewis W. Clarke in 1916, which lies easterly, southerly, northeasterly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, also being the northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 29; thence South 01 degree 00 minutes 05 seconds East, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate South Zone, along the west line of said Block 29 and also the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 292.06 feet to the north line of Olive Street as located by Lewis W. Clarke in 1916; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 36 seconds East along said north line 724.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 00 degrees 40 minutes 24 seconds West 145.00 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve, concave in the west, having a radius of 580.00 feet and a central angle of 12 degrees 29 minutes 53 seconds, a distance of 126.52 feet; thence North 79 degrees 17 minutes 55 seconds East 133.00 feet; thence North 18 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds West 191.13 feet; thence North 29 degrees 55 minutes 38 seconds West 137.04 feet; thence North 10 degrees 31 minutes 47 seconds East 508.18 feet to the southerly line of Myrtle Street (C.S.A.H. 12) as described in Document No. 346309 as recorded in said Office of the County Recorder and said line there terminate. And That part of vacated Olive Street accruing to Block 16 in McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater and Block 15 McKinstry and Seeley's Addition to Stillwater included in the following description: That part of Olive Street in McKinstry and Seeley's Addition to Stillwater and McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, according to the perfected plat of the City of Stillwater as recorded on June 3, 1878, in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Block 29 of said McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition to Stillwater, also being the Northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota; thence South 01 degrees 00 minutes 05 seconds East, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate System, South Zone, along the West line of said Block 29 and also the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 292.06 feet to the North line of Olive Street as located and established by Lewis W. Clarke in 1916 and the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 36 seconds East along said North line 1555.00 feet, more or less to the Southerly extension of the Easterly line of Block 15 of said McKinstry and Seeley's Addition and said Line there terminate. Except the following: That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, lying south of Myrtle Street (old County Highway No. 12), lying west of the west line of Brick Street and its northerly extension, lying East of a line described as follows; for descriptive purposes only said line is referred to as "Line X". Beginning at a point on the north line of West Olive Street which is 740 feet East of the west line of the Southeast Quarter which is also the west line of Block 29 McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition (as measured along the north line of West Olive Street as changed in 1916); thence North 5 degrees 00 minutes East for 569 feet; thence North 77 degrees 50 minutes West for 69 feet; thence North 10 degrees 6 minutes East for 681 feet to the south line of West Myrtle Street (old County Highway 12) and said "Line X" there terminating; And lying northerly and northeasterly of the following described lines; for descriptive purposes only said lines will be referred to as "Line A" and "Line B", Commencing at the northwest corner of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 29; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds East along the west line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter for 232.80 feet; thence South 77 degrees 38 minutes 10 seconds East for 635.12 feet; thence Southeasterly 485.52 feet along a tangential curve concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 1273.24 feet and a central angle of 21 degrees 50 minutes 55 seconds; thence South 55 degrees 47 minutes 15 seconds East tangent to last described curve for 124.48 feet; thence South 34 degrees 12 minutes 45 seconds West for 80.00 feet to the point of beginning of "Line A" to be described; thence North 55 degrees 47 minutes 15 seconds West for 124.48 feet; thence Northwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 1193.24 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 44 minutes 46 seconds for 223.80 feet more or less to its intersection with the above described "Line X" and said "Line A" there terminating; "Line B" is described as commencing at the point of beginning of above described "Line A" thence North 34 degrees 12 minutes 45 seconds East for 20.00 feet to the Point of beginning of "Line B" to be described; thence South 55 degrees 47 minutes 15 seconds East for 313.58 feet; thence Southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1014.93 feet and a total central angle of 39 degrees 19 minutes 12 seconds for 180 feet more or less to Its intersection with the west line of said Brick Street and said "Line B" there terminating. Further excepting All that part of Block 16, McKinstry and Seeley's Second Addition, according to perfected plat of City of Stillwater as recorded on June 3, 1878 in the Office of the County Recorder and that part of vacated Olive Street according to said perfected plat, being plat of McKinstry and Seeley's Addition to Stillwater, lying Northerly of the N. line of Olive Street as located and established by Lewis W. Clarke in 1916, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner Deerpath, according to recorded plat thereof on file in office of County Recorder, thence N. 0° 40' 24" West, plat bearing, along the East line of said Deerpath a distance of 133 feet; thence North 89° 19' 36" East for 157 feet; thence South 0° 40' 24" East for 133 feet to the North line of Olive Street as located and established by said Lewis W. Clarke in 1916; thence South 89°19' 36" West along said North line of Olive Street 157 feet to the place of beginning. Further excepting That part of Block 16, McKinstry and Seeley's Second addition to Stillwater, according to the perfected plat of the City of Stillwater as recorded on June 3, 1878, in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Deerpath according to the recorded plat on file in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, thence North 0 degrees 40 minutes 24 seconds West, plat bearing, along an easterly line of said Deerpath a distance of 133.00 feet to the beginning of tract of land to be described; thence continue North 0 degrees 40 minutes 24 seconds West along said easterly line 12.00 feet; thence northerly 76.51 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 580.00 feet and a central angle of 7 degrees 33 minutes 27 seconds; thence North 79 degrees 17 minutes 55 seconds East, not tangent to curve, 140.17 feet; thence South 12 degrees 42 minutes 06 seconds East 115.22 ; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 36 seconds West 157.00 feet to point of beginning. ABSTRACT PROPERTY. And All that part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, a distance of 1081.51 feet West of the Southeast corner of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, said point being the Northeast corner of Block 15 of McKinstry and Seeley's Addition to the City of Stillwater; thence West on the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, a distance of 510.43 feet to a point; thence North and parallel with the West line of Brick Street in said City a distance of 309.5 feet; thence East and parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 29, a distance of 510.43 feet to the West line of Brick Street; thence South along the West line of Brick Street, a distance 309.5 feet to the place of beginning, Washington County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ECUMEN STILLWATER / OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the street as shown on this plat and also dedicates the easement created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Ecumen, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by , on this day of 2018. SIGNED: Ecumen By: NAME WRITTEN OUT STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument by XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX, on behalf of the corporation, was acknowledged before me this day of 2018. Notary Public, , County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 09/13/17', FOR CITY REVIEW, NOT CHECKED BY COUNTY SURVEYOR C1\Users\eric j\❑neDrive\CAD-1D\17076stIllwater-Senior-Kaas\dwg\17076plat_recover.dwg 9/13/2017 6:36:29 PM CDT RESOLUTION EXHBIT B In witness whereof said Our Savior's Lutheran Church, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by on this day of 2018. SIGNED: OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH By: NAME WRITTEN OUT STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument by XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXX, on behalf of the corporation, was acknowledged before me this day of 2018. Notary Public, , County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, Eric R. Vickaryous, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Eric R. Vickaryous, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 44125 This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 by Eric R. Vickaryous. Notary Public, , County, Minnesota My Commission Expires PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER The foregoing plat of ECUMEN STILLWATER / OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH was approved and accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, on this day of 2018. By its Chairperson By its Secretary CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER This plat of ECUMEN STILLWATER / OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN CHURCH was approved by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, this day of 2018 and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, 505.03, Subd. 2. By , Mayor By , Clerk WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR Pursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of 201__. By , Washington County Surveyor Michael J. Welling WASHINGTON COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 201__, on the land hereinbefore described, have been paid. Also pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer has been entered, on this day of 201__. By , Washington County Auditor/Treasurer By , Deputy WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDER Document Number I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record this day of 201__, at ____ o'clock __.M., and was duly recorded in the Washington County Records. By , Washington County Recorder By , Deputy 41 ACRE LAND SURVEYING 10 11 12 13 14 Blaine,MN Blaine, MN 55449 15 16 17 18 7-1 19 110 111 112 113 114 115 16 7 118 20 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS ECUME wet N STILLWATER / OU - DENOTES EDGE OF WETLAND • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT. O DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 44125. ALL MONUMENT REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTE WILL BE SET WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS PLAT, AND SHALL BE EVIDENCED BY A 1/2" INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED BY RLS 44125. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: T� 10.00- —I - 10.00 1--10.00 r- 10.00 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING STREET AND REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. Detail: No Scale C \ live Street SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 20 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT, THE SOUTH LINE OF THE N1/2 OF THE SE1/4 OF SEC. 29, TWP. 30, RNG. 20, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N00°42'04"W. 41 ACRE LAND SURVEYING 10 11 12 13 Blaine,MN Blaine, MN 55449 7-1 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 1 7 118 9 120 SAVIOR'S LJJTHERA ..••••••• ..•••••• / L. I 1 N C FOUND RLS#10938 I 1 1 oI 1 . 1 1 -1- 1 , . -1- A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ./ ., 1 L_ ., 1 T 1, sgjII 0 I .— iH I % � r- _-, L1_ r,/ L1J �i 1 / -t II II II 1: 'nn UND 1/2" IRON PIPE v 5• p'OQ 69.00 \Do ciis, \ O • • A 1 / 1so02 00 56121, \ 041 \ 3, • 1 I To 0I • \ 0 \ 133.00 �U vOUND " RIPS � '08' EXISTING POND --SI WL=856.2 Ha 864U }am 140.1'7 1 S80»- 09/13/17', FOR CITY REVIEW, NOT CHECKED BY COUNTY SURVEYOR C1\Users\erIc,j\❑neDrIve\CAD-1D\17076stIllwater-Senlor-Kaas\dwg\17076plat_recover.dwg 9/13/2017 6136129 PM CDT C0 C0 FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE • r �8M St ;OM • Excup-VI ON • \ \ • • \ \ \ \ 60 0 30 GRAPHIC SCALE 60 120 240 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 60 ft. -POB LIN 1 Np 0 . 2 193.18— — — — • i I'i At r A' ;`; 11 --So. line of N1/2 of SE1/4 N88°31'09"W r`Y� �'.1 , 1 �1 A.0\ J `(`/ • 4% -A ,4%. 1 li. S89°51'11"E P1 1 r` 100.00 -4 S `1 . (` Y r� r 1 A I -.- 1/t/ I_- `. I r r L_ ./ 1 1 ,♦ 1 1 1 , r- :;I I 1/ F- L_ 1 r L_ I ,. ,* A I I 11 /1 Fi 1 wet \ wet EX.BLDG. 0 0 N mN S La co 0 w z a < 0 CI Z Z H ON m O FOUND RLS#10938 100—desc. 100.40—comp I .� 300.00 ,s -r r-. r r- I - I-- I .� 1 1 1 L- L_ I • 1 ,. r- 1\11 1 -\ 1 1 1 ,0 . ♦/ r 400.00 661.25 0 0 _15 H J `A 1 % • 5%5 .Yv 11 . 4 `1 SE corner Lot 15— O N N 0 O O z M O 09 on, • r -- I . I L1J 71- U O m 2 5y' '-` OL 1_ '^ /Y-1 V, L1J I 1 I L1J /V - L1_ ,5 %.,/ ,-\ ,_/ 0 O 0 Z 60 L- \ \ \ \ 1 c^,1 � ./ 1 FF'r\, h'1 A I A A A r-\, ��y $ 5� l^ 0 1/1/ �/ ,1 Ivl 7.7 -- '. 1 CO r r 1 1 ,-1 1 1 ., L_ 1 QOM S�GO�C\ ,'� of Sec. x, —So. line T.x/R.x2 f SE1/4 \..---- -1081.50- `\3 50 I N88°30'57"W 30, 00 O N •i NO0°27'58"W 50 L- r -1- NORTH --T SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR OUR SAVIORS LUTHERAN CHRUCH AND ECUMEN CPC CASE NO. 2017-25 WHEREAS, Anne Stanfield of Ecumen made application for approval of the Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Senior Living Care Facility and Church expansion to be located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West, property legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2017, the Stillwater Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Concept PUD; and WHEREAS, on August 2, 2017 the Stillwater City Council received the recommendation of the City Council and reviewed concept plan for the development and found them to be in keeping with the purpose and intent of the PUD provisions and that the public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered, and that the concept PUD is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the concept Planned Unit Development for Ecumen and Our Savior Lutheran Church with the following conditions: 1) A 5% reduction in the total number of parking stalls shall be permitted in the Final PUD. The total number of stalls is contingent on the density maximums and shall be determined utilizing the following ratios. a) Memory Care/Assisted Living =1 space/5 units b) Independent Living =1 space/1 units c) Church =1 space/3 seats d) Senior Care Living Facility Staff = 30 spaces 2) A complete landscape plan, including the preservation of significant trees and crown cover, will be included at the time of Preliminary Plat and/or Final PUD. 3) Copies of all covenants and easements relating to the provision, use and maintenance of common open space, parking and drive areas must be filed with the Final Plat. 4) Redesign of the parking lot drive lanes and northerly access for fire safety purposes will need to be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat and/or Final PUD. 5) Prior to the submittal of the Preliminary Plat and/or Final PUD, and in conjunction with the City and Washington County, the applicant will determine if pedestrian and vehicular improvements will be required on all adjacent Right -of -Ways. 6) Public land dedication may be used to fulfill public park and trail dedication requirements only if it is found acceptable by the Park Commission and the City Council at the time of the Preliminary/ Final Plat review. 7) The applicant will work with the City Engineering Department to determine if upgrades to the lift station will be required. The cost of the study, as well as improvements required, will be the responsibility of the property owner. 8) Determination of all conservation, drainage and utility easements shall be determined and found acceptable by the City of Stillwater and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization prior to Final PUD submittal. 9) Since there is no Concept PUD sunset clause for the Our Savior's Lutheran Church properties, this property will need to develop according to City standards and Best Management Practices in place at the time of development. However, regardless of the City development standards in place then, the planned church addition can be developed according to the foot print and location included in this Concept PUD. 10) The applicant shall explore modifying the design of the wet side to reduce the massing of the building. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota this 7th day of November, 2017. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: J. Thomas McCarty, Acting City Clerk MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Shawn Sanders, Director of Public Works Date: October 30, 2017 Re: Marine Circle Lift Station Project Bid Award, Project 2017-07 DISCUSSION On October 27, 2017, bids were opened for the Marine Circle Lift Station Project. This lift station was constructed in 1973 and is a wet well -dry well design with a prefab steel dry well. The dry well has deteriorated over time and has passed its useful maintenance life. The project will consist of replacing the existing wet well — drywell design with a new submersible lift station. This will be more efficient and safer for city personnel to maintain Eight contractors submitted bids with Minger Construction Co. Inc. of Jordan, Minnesota having the low bid. Bolton & Menk, Inc., the City's consultant, has had several projects with this contractor with good success. The City also received a quote for the control panel for the lift station from Telemetry and Process Controls, Inc. (TPC) in the amount of $36,769.00. TPC has designed, supplied equipment and maintained the controls on our lift station for the past few years and has worked well for the City. The total cost of this project is $234,019, which includes $20,000 for engineering. This amount is $30,000 over the estimated cost of this project in the 2017 Sewer Capital Outlay. To reach the funding for this project staff will use remaining funds from other sewer purchases. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council accept bid and award contract to Minger Construction Co. Inc. for $177,250.00 for the Marine Circle Lift Station Project and approve the purchase of the control panel from TPC in the amount of $36,769.00. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting RESOLUTION 2017- ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE MARINE CIRCLE LIFT STATION PROJECT, and RESOLUTION 2017- APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF CONTROL PANEL FOR THE MARINE CIRCLE LIFT STATION PROJECT. PROJECT 2017-07. ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MARINE CIRCLE LIFT STATION PROJECT (Project 2017-07) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Marine Circle Lift Station Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement; BIDDER BID AMOUNT Minger Construction Co. Inc., Jordan, Minnesota $177,250.00 Pember Companies, Inc., Menomonie, Wisconsin $210,300.00 Northdale Construction Co. Inc., Albertville, Minnesota $235,590.60 Penn Contracting, Inc., Blaine, Minnesota $243,000.00 PCiRoads, LLC, St. Michael, Minnesota $245,000.00 Geislinger & Sons, Watkins, Minnesota $245,000.00 Lametti and Sons, Inc., Hugo, Minnesota $245,200.00 CCS Contracting Inc., New Brighton, Minnesota $249,000.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $257,080.00 and WHEREAS, it appears that Minger Construction Co. Inc. of Jordan, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Minger Construction Co. Inc. in the name of the City of Stillwater for the Marine Circle Lift Station Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 7th day of November 2017. ATTEST: J. Thomas McCarty, Acting City Clerk Ted Kozlowski, Mayor AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF CONTROL PANEL FOR THE MARINE CIRCLE LIFT STATION PROJECT PROJECT 2017-07 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota that the purchase of a control panel for the Marine Circle Lift Station is hereby approved. Adopted by the City Council of Stillwater this 7th day of November 2017. Tedy Kozlowski, Mayor Attest: J. Thomas McCarty, Acting City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA HELD: November 7, 2017 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, was duly held at City Hall on November 7, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose, in part, of authorizing the call of certain outstanding General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2017 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CALL OF THE OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION SPORTS CENTER REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2005C WHEREAS, by Resolution duly adopted on February 15, 2005 (the "Resolution"), the City of Stillwater, Minnesota (the "City") issued $2,695,000 original principal amount of General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C, dated March 1, 2005 (the 'Bonds"). The City has sufficient funds on hand in the debt service account of the General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C Fund (the "Debt Service Account") to call the remaining $230,000 outstanding principal amount of the June 1, 2018 maturity on December 15, 2017, at a price of par plus accrued interest. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council hereby determines that there exists sufficient funds in the Debt Service Account to prepay on December 15, 2017, $230,000 aggregate principal amount of Bonds maturing on June 1, 2018 and the interest due thereon. 2. U.S. Bank National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, the bank at which the principal and interest on the Bonds are payable, is hereby authorized and directed to cause the Notice of Call for Redemption attached hereto as Exhibit A to be given in accordance with the provisions of the Resolution. 10360778v1 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2 10360778v1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON CITY OF STILLWATER I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to authorizing the call of the outstanding General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C. WITNESS my hand officially on November 7, 2017. Clerk 3 10360778v1 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION GENERAL OBLIGATION SPORTS CENTER REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2005C CITY OF STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by order of the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on December 15, 2017 those outstanding bonds of the City designated General Obligation Sports Center Refunding Bonds, Series 2005C, dated March 1, 2005, having a stated maturity date of June 1, 2018 and totaling $230,000 in principal amount and having a CUSIP number of 860741 8S9*. The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to December 15, 2017, on which date all interest on the bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment at U.S. Bank National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota. Dated: November 7, 2017. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA /s/ Diane Ward, City Clerk * The City shall not be responsible for the selection of or use of the CUSIP numbers, nor is any representation made as to their correctness indicated in the notice. They are included solely for the convenience of the holder. A-1 10360778v1 luwater r H E R R 7 H P L A C E C F MMNESOT A CITY COUNCIL DATE: November 3, 2017 APPLICANT: Minnesota Department of Transportation REQUEST: Approval of construction staging area plan for the Lift Bridge Conversion Project LOCATION: Chestnut Street REPORT AUTHOR: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director BACKGROUND The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has hired Kraemer, North America, LLC to complete work necessary to convert the Lift Bridge to a pedestrian and bicycle facility. Work this fall will include surveying/data gathering, shop drawings and steel straightening activities. No staging area will be required for this work. But beginning in April 2018 activity levels will increase and a staging area will be necessary. MnDOT's contractor proposes to use all of Chestnut Street between Main Street and the Lift Bridge for the staging area. However, the Downtown Parking Commission recommends using only that portion of Chestnut Street eastward of the new trail crossing. And, instead of using the remainder of Chestnut Street, Lot 4 would be used for staging. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consider approving a staging area plan for the Lift Bridge conversion project. SPECIFIC PROPOSAL As seen in attached Site Plan A, the staging area as requested by the construction contractor has two main sections. 1. The main section will be adjacent to the bridge and will be used for all of the construction materials and equipment. This section would be fenced and include the concourse, portions of North and South Lowell Park, and Chestnut Street from Water Street to the bridge. This fence would be installed in April 2018 and would be taken down in June 2019. 2. The second section would be on Chestnut Street between Main Street and Water Street. This section would be used for contractor parking and deliveries of materials and supplies. Lift Bridge conversion project November 3, 2017 Page 2 Under this proposal, Chestnut Street is kept free of public vehicles so that as large trucks make deliveries, there is room to maneuver (construction crews can move their vehicles to accommodate the deliveries). So, Chestnut is proposed to be barricaded on Mondays through Fridays from April to November 2018, and then again from April 2019 to June 2019 (though sidewalks would always be open and safe to use.) On weekends this section of Chestnut Street would not be barricaded. COMMENTS There are two issues of concern to City staff and the Downtown Parking Commission. The first is that even though sidewalks will remain open, barricading Chestnut between Main and Water during the week may discourage customers from visiting Leo's sidewalk window, the Wedge & Wheel and Leo's outside dining area. The second concern is that the fenced construction staging area will block use of Municipal Lot 4. Traffic flow through this lot is one-way northbound and the only access is from Chestnut, which will be blocked by the Contractor's fencing. RECOMMENDATION The Downtown Parking Commission and City staff recommend that: 1. The staging area fencing would be as seen in the attached Staging Plan B. Only the portion of Chestnut Street eastward of the new trail crossing would be fenced. And, since Lot 4 will be unavailable anyway while Chestnut is used for staging, Lot 4 could become part of the staging area. 2. Instead of paying the $25,143 fee for reserving Lot 4 between April 2018 and June 2019, the bridge contractor, at his cost and at the direction of the City Engineer, would reconstruct Lot 4 so that it is entered from Myrtle Street rather than Chestnut Street. This work would have to be complete before the July 4th fireworks show in 2019. COUNCIL ACTION The City Council should decide whether to approve the contractor's request, or something similar to the Parking Commission recommendation. In either case, an agreement for use and reconstruction, if that is the option chosen by Council, of Lot 4 would be brought back to the City Council at a future meeting. bt attachments: Staging Plan A Staging Plan B Lift Bridge conversion project November 3, 2017 Page 3 Staging Plan A Proposed by Contractor Ties into existing wall & fence storage shed chain -linked fence Ties into existing wall & fence Street barricaded M -F MnDOT construction office Lift Bridge conversion project November 3, 2017 Page 4 Staging Plan B Recommended by Parking Commission SYS Schedule TASK 2017 NOV DEC 2078 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT Task 1 -Organize the Effort Task 2 - Understand the Context Task 3 - Explore the Possibilities Task 4 - Update the Plan Elements Task 5 - Assemble the Final Plan and Seek Approvals Task 6 - Prepare Plan for Distribution and Agency Approvals COMBINED MEETING • L COMBINED MEETING 1 ik e L `t MEETINGS Advisory Committee 4 + + 4 4 +' Parks and Recreation Board Planning Commission • • City Council A, A Community Engagement Activities Community Engagement F P. P Pe e P > ® Pe P♦ PP AA PHASE 1 ENGAGEMENT PHASE 2 ENGAGEMENT 10/19/2017 Was County BOARD AGENDA NOVEMBER 7, 2017 — 9:00 A.M. Board of Commissioners an Mliron, District 1 Kaminski, District 2 try Kriesel, District 3 Karla Bigham, District 4 Lisa Weik, Chair, District 5 1. 9:00 Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance 2. 9:00 Comments from the Public Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it to the County Board secretary or the County Administrator. The County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and city of residence, and present your comments. Your comments must be addressed exclusively to the Board Chair and the full Board ofCommissioners. Comments addressed to individual Board members will not be allowed. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation ifit becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or ifit is not relevant to an issue that is part of Washington County's Responsibilities. 3. 9:10 Consent Calendar — Roll Call Vote 4. 9:10 Community Services — Sarah Tripple, Planning and Program Manager Approval to Release Transit Needs Study Draft Report for Public Comment 5. 9:20 Library — Keith Ryskoski, Director and Mary Burke, Marine Community Library Board Chair Update from the Marine Library Association on Activities and Services at the Marine on St. Croix Community Library 6. 9:30 Public Health and Environment — Jeff Travis, Senior Environmental Program Manager Approval of Contract with Dynamic Recycling for the Transportation and Recycling of Waste Consumer Electronics Collected by the County at the Environmental Center and Remote Collection Events 7. 9:40 Public Works — Kevin Peterson, Engineer II Resolution — Approval of Cooperative Agreement No. 133636 with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for Preliminary and Final Engineering on the Hadley Avenue (County State Aid Highway 35) and Trunk Highway 36 Interchange Project 8. 9:50 General Administration — Molly O'Rourke, County Administrator 9. 10:00 Commissioner Reports — Comments — Questions This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise questions to the staff This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during this lime. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting. 10. Board Correspondence 11. 10:15 Adjourn 12. 10:20-10:50 Board Workshop with Public Health and Environment—Nikki Stewart, Environmental Program Supervisor Discuss the Draft Washington County Waste Management Master Plan 2018-2036 13. 10:55-11:25 Board Workshop with Public Health and Environment — Jeff Travis, Senior Environmental Program Manager Provide Update on the Yard Waste Collection Project Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County board Room rvwl 3 e .;el0%0w,O, In 0,2.,064. ri.00, n.n..a 0.0/!4,,,10.,ry... EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CONSENT CALENDAR * NOVEMBER 7, 2017 The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption: DEPARTMENT/AGENCY ITEM Administration A. Community Services Human Resources Library Property Records and Taxpayer Services Public Health and Environment Public Works Approval of October 17, 2017 County Board Meeting Minutes. B. Approval to set December 12, 2017 as the date for a public hearing on the final 2018-2022 Washington County Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). C. Approval to reappoint Edward Marachan, Stillwater, to the Valley Branch Watershed District to a three-year term expiring November 13, 2020. D. Approval of contract #11239 with Sheryl and Paul Nickle to provide short-term foster care to individuals working with Washington County Adult Mental Health Case Management. E. Approval of memorandum of agreements for the 2018 county contribution for health insurance for each of the following union/employee groups: American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Exempt and Non -Exempt units; Correctional Officer/911 Dispatchers represented by Minnesota Public Employees Association (MNPEA); Probation Officers represented by Teamsters; Attorney's Association; Deputies represented by Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc. (LELS); and Deputy Sheriff Sergeants represented by Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc. (LELS). F. Approval of resolution for a request from the City of Marine for $6,000 from the Jordan bequest to be used for materials and services at the Marine Community Library. G. Approval of the plat of Basswood Grove in Denmark Township. H. Approval of ratification of the maintenance and support agreement between Xerox State & Local Solutions, Inc. and the Minnesota Counties Computer Cooperative. Approval of Cooperative Cost Share Agreement No. 11261 between Independent School District #832 and Washington County for the County State Aid Highway 12 Mahtomedi Middle School Traffic Signal Project. Sheriff s Office J. Adoption of resolution authorizing the Washington County Sheriff's Office to accept a donation from Target Corporation in the amount of $1,500. K. Approval of a grant agreement between the State Court Administrator's Office and Washington County in the amount of $6,604 for the period of November 1, 2017 through April 1, 2018. Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action. Resistive b'Aleniny devices are available for use in the County Board Room rcl....� .xy..e or.:yr.,..,...n.- r... 44:P.104i.4.r H.92r. von w , r.. e.ar tats Alit arm EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER