Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017-11-08 CPC Packet
Sti liwater. THEBRTHPLCEOFMNIESOTA AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North November 8th, 2017 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of October 11th, 2017 regular meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS - The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item. 2. Case No. 2017-52: Consideration of a Variance to the Front Yard Setback to add a second story to an existing home for the property located at 410 Hazel St E. Jay and Noelle Singerhouse, property owner. 3. Case No. 2017-53: Consideration of a Zoning Map Amendment for the property located at 900 Broadway St N and XXX 1st Street North. Larry and Paulette Lappi, property owner. 4. Case No. 2017-54: Consideration of a Variance to the Side Yard Setback to build a deck and screened porch under deck on the property located at 2735 White Pine Way. Matthew and Katherine Jones, property owner. 5. Case No. 2017-56: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat and Zoning Map Amendment for Nottingham Village, a single family subdivision on the property located at 12220 Mckusick Road North. Randy and Judy Petrie, property owner and Todd Erickson, representative. 6. Case No. 2017-57: Consideration of a Special Use Permit Amendment to the fencing requirements for the property located at 1677 Orleans St W. St. Croix Village, LLC, property owner and Juanita Pekay, applicant. 7. Case No. 2017-58: Consideration of a Special Use Permit to add an amusement and recreational establishment at the property located at 14200 60th Street North. Eagles 94, property owner and Chad Greeder, applicant. VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. STAFF UPDATES/FOR YOUR INFORMATION 8. 2040 Stillwater Comprehensive Plan (Handouts) VIII. ADJOURNMENT THE 1I11TNYLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 11, 2017 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairman Collins called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Collins, Commissioners Fletcher, Hansen, Kocon, Lauer and Siess Absent: Commissioner Hade and Councilmember Menikheim Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of September 13, 2017 regular meeting Motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to approve the minutes of the September 13, 2017 regular meeting. Motion passed 6-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2017-42: Consideration of a Variance to the maximum fence height in the exterior side yard of property located at 823 Fifth Street South. Michael Hinman, property owner. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Michael Hinman is requesting a 30" variance to the 42" maximum fence height in exterior side yard setback areas for the construction of a 72" fence. He is proposing to place the footings for the fence in a retaining wall on his property and adjacent to a public sidewalk. The wall is existing and in a dilapidated state but would be rebuilt at the time the fence is installed. The wall is approximately four feet tall at its highest point, so the top of the fence would be about 10 feet above the grade of the subject property's rear yard at this point. Staff recommends denial on the basis that if granted, the variance will alter the essential character of the locality and is contrary to the intent of providing an open streetscape. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Luke Hobbs, 811 Fifth Street South, stated he supports the granting of the variance for privacy and safety reasons. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Planning Commission October 11, 2017 Commissioner Kocon said he supports the variance because the sidewalk looks down into the backyard. He sees the fence as ornamental and feels it will not impact traffic sight distance. Commissioner Siess stated she agrees with the code as written and opposes the granting of the variance. Commissioner Lauer noted it is difficult to see how the fence as proposed will fit into the neighborhood because despite the open bottom, it will look like a solid mass. Chairman Collins said he has a hard time supporting the variance due to the massing of the fence. Commissioner Hansen recognized there is a uniqueness to the neighborhood due to the commercial uses. He feels that the character of the neighborhood would not be altered by a six foot fence relative to the massing of the painted cinderblock building next door. He cited the safety and privacy concerns of the applicant due to the difference in elevation of the sidewalk versus the yard. He supports the variance. Commissioner Fletcher stated the proposed gaps at the bottom of the fence may not completely solve the safety issue. She understands the privacy concerns and is undecided about granting the variance. City Planner Wittman confirmed there would still be a grade differential from a proposed six-foot gap in the fence. The sidewalk is located on the applicant's property. The City was unaware of the grade change prior to the application. Commissioner Kocon noted the applicant was not present to discuss alternatives. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, to table Case No. 2017-42, Variance to the maximum fence height in the exterior side yard of property located at 823 Fifth Street South, to allow the property owner and the City to determine a design that will achieve the applicant's desires and protect the public from falls. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. Case No. 2017-43: Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment to allow a cigar shop and sampling room in the Central Business District (CBD). Happy Bridge, LLC, property owner and Scott and Luke Sodergren, applicants. City Planner Wittman stated that Scott and Luke Sodergren, of Sodie's Cigars, would like to expand their Osceola, WI, business by opening a retail store at 209 Main Street South in the Central Business District (CBD). While the Zoning Code allows for tobacco sales as an accessory use (such as in a gas station or bar), retail tobacco sales as a primary use is not permitted nor is it allowed by Use Permit. The specific Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) request is to amend Section 31-101, Definitions, by adding the following: "Tobacconist means any tobacco retailer engaged in receiving tobacco premium cigars, and accessories for retail sale at a retail outlet where seventy (70) percent or more of the total sales/revenue are generated from premium cigars, pipe tobacco and tobacco- related accessories, excluding cigarettes. Said outlet must operate a walk-in, on -site humidor." Ms. Wittman added that the applicant has verbally indicated their desire to have a smoking lounge associated with the retail sales. She further stated that Tobacco Products Shops are exempt from the from the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (MCIAA) meaning they may allow customers to sample tobacco products indoors. The MCIAA does not address smoke drift. Because the structure dates to the 1800s and shares common walls with other structures, there is the potential for smoke drift and second hand smoke. Therefore, Page 2 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 according to Building Inspector Cindy Shilts, smoke -tight construction would be required along with certain HVAC improvements. Staff finds that in its current form, the ZAT is not consistent with the Zoning Code or the Comprehensive Plan, and recommends that the Commission recommend denial of the ZAT as proposed. However, if certain modifications are made, the amended ZAT could be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Applicants Scott and Luke Sodergren introduced themselves. Scott Sodergren explained why they want to expand to Stillwater and create a destination cigar shop. Their shop in Osceola has grown and done well. In Osceola, there is an apartment above them and another shop next to them. There has never been an issue with cigar smoke. They do not have a sampling room nor any indoor smoking at the Osceola shop due to state regulations in Wisconsin. Luke Sodergren stated he is buying the cigar shop business from his father Scott. The shop would sell cigars, pipe tobacco, and related items, but no cigarettes, e-cigarettes or vape accessories. They plan to install a strong HVAC system with air scrubbers. It would be challenging for them to have a profitable business without having a cigar sampling room. Chairman Collins asked if the applicants would be willing to seal off their smoking room. Luke Sodergren replied with two air scrubbers and a strong HVAC system to create a negative pull, it probably wouldn't be needed but they are willing to do whatever is required. Commissioner Siess asked if they looked at any other locations in downtown Stillwater. Luke Sodergren said they looked at other locations but what drew them to the proposed location is its size, view of the river, the stone wall with the fireplace and its aesthetic appeal. Cameron Murray, 350 Main Street North Unit 346, urged the Commission to deny the application because it does not further the public necessity or general community welfare. It would bring more smoking and more smokers to downtown and have unintended health consequences. Luke Hobbs, 811 Fifth Street South, said if the HVAC system is negative pressure, he would support the request as long as neighboring businesses are not affected by the smoke. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Chairman Collins remarked that he likes the diversity represented by the business, but feels that if permitted, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) should be required. Commissioner Kocon said he understands the Building Inspector's suggestion of building a shell and putting the shop inside it. He feels it is wise to require a CUP as opposed to it being an outright permitted use. He doesn't think any business in town wants people loitering outside their front door smoking. He could support the ZAT without a ban on sampling. Commissioner Hansen said he sees both sides of the issue. He understands the desire not to overly modify the historic buildings in downtown Stillwater. He feels a CUP should be required for all districts for such businesses. Page 3 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 Commissioner Lauer commented the business is a perfect fit for downtown but a CUP should be required. Commissioner Fletcher stated she supports the shop because it adds business diversity to downtown. Commissioner Siess stated she has no issue with the use, but she has an issue with the space. Motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to recommend that the City Council approve Case No. 2017-43, Zoning Text Amendment to allow a cigar shop and sampling room in the CBD, with staff -recommended language modifications: 1) defining Tobacconist and 2) adding Tobacconist operations and sale of specialty tobacco products, as well as tobacco, general, as an allowable use in the CDB and all other zoning districts with a CUP. Motion passed 5-1, with Commissioner Siess voting nay. Case No. 2017-47: Consideration of a Short Term Home Rental License Type B for the property located at 1004 Fifth Street North. Joseph Widmer, property owner. Ms. Wittman stated the applicant is requesting a Type B Short Term Home Rental License. The case is before the Planning Commission because a neighbor submitted a letter of objection citing concerns about the number of bedrooms and guests, and parking congestion. Staff finds that the request meets all conditions of the vacation rental ordinance and recommends approval. Commissioner Hansen expressed concern with the family room labelled additional sleeping space in the proposal. He feels this should not constitute additional sleeping space because it reduces the common space and this should be clarified in the code. Commissioner Kocon also questioned the labelling of the family room as a guest bedroom. Commissioner Siess stated that there will always be this problem, for instance houses that have lofts which are not dedicated bedrooms depending on how they are designed. Ms. Wittman said since it meets the code requirements for a sleeping room, staff felt the family room met the requirements for a bedroom but she can understand the Commissioners' concerns. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Joe Widmer, applicant, stated he was not planning on making the family room into a sleeping room. He is fine with five bedrooms. They do not intend to rent their home very often. Any socializing can spill into adjacent Staples Park and not onto other properties. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Chairman Collins, to approve Case No. 2017-47, a one- year provisional Type B Short Term Home Rental License for five guest rooms for the property located at 1004 Fifth Street North. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. Case No. 2017-48: Consideration of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit (SUP) for the properties located at 1616 Olive Street West and 114 Brick Page 4 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 Street South. Our Savior's Lutheran Church, property owner and Anne Stanfield, Ecumen, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Anne Stanfield, representing Ecumen, and Pastor Dale Stiles, representing Our Savior's Lutheran Church (OSLC), have submitted an application to develop a 15.01 acre site located at 114 Brick Street South and 1616 Olive Street West. The City approved a Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this development in August 2017. Ecumen will be the owner and operator of the proposed Senior Care Living Facility and OSLC will continue to own their existing church structure on the site, which is proposed to be expanded in the future. The site would be developed in two phases: 1) Ecumen Stillwater, a 143-unit senior living building, all parking, drive and pedestrian improvements for the two uses; and 2) a future Our Savior's Lutheran Church expansion. Ms. Wittman discussed the proposed plan in regard to parking, landscaping, covenants, pedestrian and traffic improvements, massing of the building, and signage. She summarized City staff comments and developers' revisions to the plan since concept approval was granted in August. A letter from a neighbor was received opposing the architectural design. City staff met with Washington County regarding traffic patterns which need to be discussed further. Ms. Wittman summarized written concerns received from neighbors: letters were received from Jim and Barb Ylinen, 201 Deer Path, regarding traffic, preservation of natural resources, noise, smells, and obstruction of views; and from Mike Miskowiak, 314 Hemlock, regarding loss of green space, traffic, noise, and light pollution. Staff recommends approval of the Final PUD, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat, and SUP with 12 conditions. Commissioner Siess asked who reviewed the geotechnical engineering services report. City Planner Wittman responded that Public Works Director Shawn Sanders reviewed the report. His comments and two suggested requirements are listed in the staff report. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Anne Stanfield, Ecumen, explained the intent to create a shared campus to support intergenerational programming between the residents of the senior living facility and Our Savior's Lutheran Church. Developers are prepared to comply with the staff -recommended conditions and have responded to neighborhood feedback. Mindy Michael, Kaas Wilson Architects, reviewed the current design of the project with images indicating revisions since concept approval. She emphasized the demand for senior housing. Chairman Collins asked if a pitched roof was considered so the structure is not so boxy. Ms. Michael stated they are bound by the height restriction of 35 feet. A pitched roof would preclude three stories, thus they are planning a flat roof. Chairman Collins asked about the plan for screening on the west side. Ms. Michael stated they propose planting trees as large as feasible. They would be willing to relocate more of the proposed trees to the west side if they would fit. Commissioner Siess asked about the chemical -type odor found in the soil, of undetermined source, noted in the geotechnical report done in March. Ms. Michael stated no further testing was done; it was believed to smell somewhat like fertilizer but it was not strong, it was mentioned in case it needed to be investigated further. Commissioner Siess asked Ms. Wittman if the City were to investigate it, what would happen? Ms. Wittman replied it would be an untraditional request and she has not dealt with that sort of request before. Page 5 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 Ms. Stanfield added the smell is in an area of poor soils where there will not be any building activity. They have avoided any disruption in that area. It only appeared in that one location. Commissioner Siess noted there are a lot of water pockets in Stillwater. On page 20, the geotechnical report discussed some water concerns. She asked if engineers looked at how neighboring areas have dealt with with water. Ms. Stanfield replied they investigated only the proposed site, no additional properties. Anecdotally, when taking the photo from 181 Deer Path, she did see their backyard was quite moist and they said they have quite a bit of drainage going into the pond north of their house. Commissioner Siess remarked there is a lot of discussion about senior housing but not about affordable senior housing. She asked if this facility will be considered high end or affordable. Ms. Stanfield replied that Ecumen has a range of housing from affordable to market rate senior housing. Their intent for this project is not HUD -subsidized but they want it to be financially accessible to a broad range of potential residents. Barbara Ylinen, 201 Deer Path, spoke in opposition, stating that she and her husband have lived in their home for 33 years. This enormous facility is all she will see from her windows and her backyard. The proposed modification is not significant enough to be an improvement. Commissioner Siess asked Ms. Ylinen to elaborate on odors she mentioned in her letter. Ms. Ylinen replied she was talking about the odors from an industrial kitchen which are a real concern. Dan Zenk, 261 Deer Path, asked how close the proposed building is to his property line. City Planner Wittman replied the distance is 70 feet. Mr. Zenk stated he planted all the trees because the church reconstruction resulted in light shining in his windows. He is concerned if the path is expanded, it will take out trees. Ms. Wittman replied the development will not be taking out trees on the western property line. The trail itself will stay as is. The east part of the trail will be a substrate that is placed and then planted with grass so a fire truck may drive on it. No changes are proposed to the westerly portion of the trail. Mr. Zenk continued that he does not want to see that large a building that close to his backyard. It will affect property values, cast more light, generate noise and cause fire trucks to be literally in his backyard. He also is concerned about safety and adding to Deer Path traffic volumes. Kyle Brandvik, 113 Brick Street South, voiced concerns about property values, green space, traffic, pollution, noise, and the impact on lifestyles. She questioned the notification about the neighborhood meetings, which seemed timed by the developer for holiday weekends. She has not seen renderings of what the buildings will look like and feels the neighbors are not aware of what is going on. Every time she comes there is a different plan. She added that there is a lot of concern about property values in the neighborhood. She doesn't question the value of an assisted living facility but feels it is not the right place. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kocon noted if the site were developed as single family, with over 60 homes, that would consume a lot of green space with roads, buildings and driveways. He feels the neighbors' concerns are legitimate but it would probably be more impactful if it were a single family development. He is not diminishing traffic, light and privacy concerns. He feels the staff report is very comprehensive. Page 6 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 Chairman Collins agreed that the staff report was thorough and addressed a lot of his concerns. To try to protect the views as much as possible, he would like to see the biggest trees possible planted on the western side, and would also like to see downlit and shielded lighting. With these additional conditions, he feels the development fits and will be a benefit to the community. Commissioner Fletcher said compared to a development of single family homes, this PUD with 50% open space is really compelling. Dense living takes a while to get used to but it is the wave of the future. She is in favor of the proposal with conditions discussed. Commissioner Siess said the developer and the Commission can try harder to accommodate the concerns. Fast growing trees die, so the developer should look at trees that will be long-lived. The building mass, especially in proximity to 261 Deer Path, needs to be re-examined. If the architects can do anything with a pitched roof, they owe it to the nearby homeowners. From a planning perspective, the City needs to consider what will be done with these structures after the baby boom is over. She encouraged everyone to consider this issue including the City, in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan update. She stated there are people who are looking at that from other perspectives, low income housing, disability housing, but City codes don't allow that right now. Commissioner Hansen noted that there is no way to know what the population of senior housing residents will be in the future but Stillwater is so deficient in that type of space now that it could probably be doubled and still be deficient. A certain density and number of units is needed to make these projects financially feasible. With a gable roof, it would not have that extra floor. He doesn't believe a gable roof would be appropriate on a three story building. He recognized that the building is massive but it is set far back. He is less concerned about traffic issues than before the traffic study. He is in favor of the project and thinks the applicant has addressed many of the issues. He realizes that the homeowners on Deer Path oppose the project. Commissioner Lauer said he favors the project. Regarding the life cycle of the building, it may become a destination for the whole metro area. He feels the proposal makes a lot of sense. City Planner Wittman acknowledged that the City and County need to look at the Olive/Brick/Myrtle system to design improvements as part of a future conversation with the Commission. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Lauer, to recommend that the City Council approve Case No. 2017-48, Final PUD, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Special Use Permit for the properties located at 1616 Olive Street and 114 Brick Street, with the 12 conditions recommended by staff, and the following additional conditions: 13) all lighting shall be downlit and shielded; 14) the landscaping plan shall be amended to provide coniferous trees on the west and east property lines, to provide for screening from all adjacent properties; 15) the applicant shall be responsible for installing a stop sign on Ramsey Street, in both directions. Motion passed 5-1, with Commissioner Siess voting nay. Case No. 2017-49: Consideration of a Variance to the front yard setback and the expansion of a legally non -conforming structure on the property located at 204 Birchwood Drive North. Genevieve Schulze, property owner and Cynthia Polzin, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Cynthia Polzin is requesting a 9' variance to the required 30' Front Yard Setback for the construction of a vestibule on a legal, non -conforming home. The home, permitted by the City prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance, has a front yard setback Page 7 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 of 25', and the proposed vestibule would have a front yard setback of 21'. Finding that practical difficulty has been established, staff recommends approval with three conditions. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Kocon, seconded by Commissioner Hansen, to approve Case No. 2017-49, Variance to the front yard setback and the expansion of a legally non -conforming structure on the property located at 204 Birchwood Drive North, with the three conditions recommended by staff. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. Case No. 2017-50: Consideration of a Variance to the structural lot coverage and a Variance to the 30 foot Steep Slope Setback for the property located at 628 Olive Street West. Jenafer and Grant Smith, property owners. City Planner Wittman explained the request. Jenafer and Grant Smith have applied for variances to construct a temporary shed, to be located approximately 2' from a slope of greater than 25% in the rear of the property. Additionally, there is 1,954 square feet of structural coverage existing on the 7,017 square foot lot. The existing lot coverage is 27.8% of the total lot area. With the addition of a 120 square foot shed, the total structural coverage on the property will become 29.5% of the total lot area. Thus, the following variances are required: 1) a 28' variance to the 30' steep slope setback; and 2) a 4.5% variance to the 25% maximum structural coverage for the addition of 120 square feet of structural area. On the basis that practical difficulty has been established by the applicant, staff recommends approval with two conditions. Commissioner Kocon stated he is in favor of the request. He asked if there is any opportunity for a rain garden. City Planner Wittman replied it would be too close to the ravine, causing erosion. Chairman Collins opened the public hearing. Applicant Jenafer Smith stated she measured from where they constructed the retaining wall to the slope which is 13.10 feet. The whole area there is hostas and they did not disrupt that. She added that they have purchased the paint to match the house. The shed will be moveable. Chairman Collins closed the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Siess, seconded by Commissioner Hansen, to approve Case No. 2017-50, Variance to the structural lot coverage and Variance to the 30 foot Steep Slope setback for the property located at 628 Olive Street West, with the two conditions recommended by staff, and the following additional condition: the accessory structure shall be the same color as the primary residence. Motion passed 6-0, all in favor. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. STAFF UPDATES Water Street Inn Appeal Page 8 of 9 Planning Commission October 11, 2017 City Planner Wittman informed the Commission that the appeal was approved by the City Council. October 19 Comprehensive Plan Review Session City Planner Wittman informed the Commission that a review session will be held October 19 for all Commissioners and Councilmembers regarding the process for the Comprehensive Plan update. Code Changes Commissioner Siess asked for a status on the code changes. City Planner Wittman said due to workload she is hoping to accomplish this in November. Meeting with the City Council Commissioner Siess asked about scheduling a Planning Commission meeting with the City Council. Ms. Wittman replied that the Comprehensive Plan update process will provide a good opportunity for Commissioners to work with members of the Council on planning issues. Commissioner Siess replied that the Comprehensive Plan does not deal with ordinances and variances that have come before the Commission which have not gone through such as yard parking, various cases over the years regarding firearms sale, and other issues. She feels that meeting yearly with the City Council would be a healthy thing for the Commission and the City. Commissioner Kocon suggested if Commissioners have agenda items to discuss with the Council, they could bring them forward as a Commission, put together an agenda and then determine when a joint meeting would be mutually convenient. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Lauer, seconded by Commissioner Kocon, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. All in favor, 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink Recording Secretary Page 9 of 9 fflwater 6' . R T N P 1.. 4 T; E 91 F MINNFSOITA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: November 8, 2017 CASE NO.: 2017-52 APPLICANT: Jay and Noelle Singerhouse, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of a Variance to the Front Yard setback for the vertical expansion of an existing, nonconforming residence and covered entryway addition to the structure located at 410 Hazel Street East ZONING: RB - Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND Jay and Noelle Singerhouse would like to 'pop the top' of their single family residence and add a covered entry onto the western side of their home. The existing residence is nonconforming in that it is situated on the southern property line. And since the vertical expansion would maintain this same non- conforming setback, a variance will be required for the setback from this property line. It should be noted that the property is also legally nonconforming in that it does not meet the St. Croix River Overlay District requirements for minimum lot size or for the maximum 20% impervious coverage. However, these two non -conformities pre-existed the adoption of the Riverway rules and, therefore, are grandfathered. Furthermore, the proposed lot improvements do not exacerbate either pre-existing non -conformity. The lot size stays the same and the overall lot coverage will be reduced by (approximately) 240 square feet. Therefore, no variances are required for these two non -conformities. SPECIFIC REQUEST Thus, the property owners are seeking: • a 20' variance to the 20' Front Yard setback for the addition of a second story; and • a 20' variance to the 20' Front Yard setback for the addition of a 6' deep by 10' wide covered porch to be located on the west side of the structure APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS Section 31-208, Variances, indicates the Planning Commission may grant a variance, but only when all of the following conditions are found: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. The general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code is to regulate and restrict use of land for the protection of public health, safety and welfare. The purpose a Front Yard setback and maximum lot coverage is to maintain an open, unoccupied space for uniform yards for aesthetic open space and environmental benefits, including the preservation of areas for adequate drainage. The existing residence is located 28" from the Hazel Street right-of-way; the second story addition will have the same setbacks as the existing residence and will still be located approximately 18' from the back of the curb. The applicant is also proposing to move the front door off of this property line, shifting the entrance to the west side of the home. This will help create a front yard adjacent to highway 95. That said, there will be no changes to the south side of the home that would be in conflict with the general purposed and intent of the Zoning Code. While the applicant is proposing an additional 60 square feet of structural coverage, they are proposing to remove nearly 300 square feet of other impervious surface. Ultimately this will help the property come closer to conformance with the lot coverage requirements of the St. Croix River Overlay District 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The property is zoned RB - Two Family Residential and is guided for Low/Medium Density Residential use. There are no application elements that are contradictory to the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. "Practical difficulties," as use in connection with the granting of a variance, means that all of the following must be found to apply: The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls; Historically this property has been utilized for single family use. Its footprint, of 928 square feet, is quite small. The proposal of a second story to increase the livable area is reasonable. The applicant's desire to relocate the entrance to the western side of the structure, to be located in the Front Yard setback, is also reasonable as it will eliminate the existing right-of-way encroachment. Additionally, the addition of a front porch will eliminate the property owner's need for other impervious surface coverage at the rear of the home. CPC 7/12/2017 (Case No. 2017-23) 419 2nd Street South Page 2 of 4 ii. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the landowner; and While the property was owned by the Schulenburg & Boeckeler Lumber Company during the 1800s, it has been determined to not be a historic resource as it is typical post-war construction. Common of structures constructed of this era, no building permit exists. Regardless of the era of construction, it is clear the home was constructed prior to the adoption of the Zoning Code. Furthermore, the property owners purchased this home in 2011. Aerial imagery shows the existing impervious surface (driveway, walkways, patios, etc.) existed at the time of purchase. iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The vertical expansion of the second story improvements will not alter the setback from the Hazel Street right-of-way. Approximately 18' of boulevard will remain in an area that requires a 20' Front Yard setback. The Hazel Street stairway access and a landing will be removed, reducing the streetside improvements. Additionally, by situating the home towards the highway, the house will have a front and rear yard similar to other homes on Schulenburg Alley. Section 31-208 further indicates: • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. • A previous variance must not be considered to have set a precedent for the granting of further variances. Each case must be considered on its merits. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission has the following options: 1. Make the finding that practical difficulties do exist for the property owner and approve a 20' variance to the 20' Front Yard setback for the addition of a second story and a 6' deep by 10' wide covered porch to be located on the west side of the structure, with or without conditions. The Planning Commission may impose conditions in the granting of a variance. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. If the Commission were to find practical difficulties do exist for the property owner, staff would recommend the following conditions: a. Plans shall be substantially similar to those on file with the Community Development Department's Case No. 2017-52. b. As part of the building permit site plan, the applicant will demonstrate the removal of approximately 300 square feet of existing impervious surface coverage. c. A sewer connection permit shall be reviewed and approved prior to the release of a building permit. CPC 7/12/2017 (Case No. 2017-23) 419 2nd Street South Page 3 of 4 d. A building permit shall be reviewed and approved prior to any construction occurring on the property. e. Major exterior modifications to the variance permit request shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as per Section 31-204, Subd. 7. 2. Table the application and request additional information from staff or the applicant. 3. Make the finding that practical difficulties have not been established and deny the variance, with or without prejudice. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION On the basis that practical difficulty has been established by the applicant, staff recommends conditional approval of the aforementioned variances. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative Request Aerial View Exterior Elevations (2 pages) Floor Plans (3 pages) CPC 7/12/2017 (Case No. 2017-23) 419 2nd Street South Page 4 of 4 0 The Birthplace of Minnesota Site Location Map 410 Hazel St E 160 320 General Site Location 640 Feet October 10, 2017 Jay and Noelle Singerhouse 410 Hazel Street East Stillwater, MN 55082 To Planning Commission: Our current home, located on 410 Hazel St E, is a two bedroom 928 square foot rambler with a one car detached garage. We are requesting a variance on Front Yard and Rear Yard setbacks to give us an opportunity to add a second level and entryway porch while giving our home a more classic Stillwater feel and appearance. Our home has been updated throughout the years, stripping it of most of its original historic character. With several homes being updated in the Dutchtown area, most being two stories in our surrounding area, we feel as though our newly designed home would be more fitting for this area. The obstacle that we have run into is that our lot is very long and narrow with roadways on three sides. Currently the home is built along the southern most property line. Since we are unable to move the home, expand outwardly, or create any more hard surfaces, we feel the best option would be to remove the roof and build up. The plans for our new second level would remain in the identical footprint as our current single story home. New home plans include a more significant and defined entry way that would give the home dimension, character, and a place for visitors to be sheltered from the weather. The new entryway porch would be ten feet by six feet and extend the west side of the home on the southern most corner. The square footage of our new home plan would be near or below the average for our neighborhood. We would also like to request the abandonment of our septic tank after proper uninstallation and updating our home with city sewer. The proposed sight plan would actually give this property more green space and less hard surfaces. The added level would not diminish any permeable surface and during construction we would be removing over 300 square feet of concrete on the north side of our home. We feel our proposed project would not only create more green space and result in no further intrusion on our current homes setbacks, but also beautify the neighborhood and create more historic Stillwater charm. Thank you for your consideration. Jay and Noelle Singerhouse Noelle Singerhouse 612-999-0066 i s S arkl fir' .it-4-1 L_J 6 ALA 1Yi1 ! 1 t►b1 cY fr-t:i • i ; er.ose__ k tcoted.- r 6 i l !mac] uffi& J 4- rtt-SCI ------7 %MEM3b Stl'Y I 4: V4It ` -L- p: YAWL - tv k�e A- R c. e. .. D (r t lam- k eo j'2..J. ',,.5. $ ft S - \A L ' ' k4cy L < I-I,r< j Nag zQ F b Riau ab ..f ,(zmr i r e rkei4, - "J 2 9( Z 0 7 le 5 c �17 v-4c \ L-1I cPA I�GL.�efto �4. ________________ HEN sum kstl (E))045TD,16 PCAN) 44-A e iY \le L1 p 5... -t c, Actl 0 0 t, 1--0e-44910 rrl 1► ' Ja if r t 'f Ic,. to C o-/ r �.� Pry tea -- 443 3 2 m Ssc ; N .r •..*a cr. i- . k St Z.015 rr d,Aciaaarbor4 Z T L WALLS c t r t r.L 4-T1 •To C-. c t g-a (;:r .1 c -i P lv ' -- cy Je -c - S) A zoo iv.: n)tt5-T1 616. ,Pc RNk3 V&A. 4 6', . 201 1 ut �.� 142 21.) t Swzof Lt�� 3 — k -cits Lo l /9 . c= . ter- t .td : (1 co,iioe. 1444 k)J kV -Liu u 4W4Lai&Q I 5 t a-, le( ►J. v�S 16;16'.G, lN� IL -Li t/ 9,S-.1 IN S ? i dIP tt e ?O v 4-t-°ts�, 1 Ate- 6tivori s i*t f airroof •/ U r. 1 loorttil . ¶` . i „. AND -:3k,c-'110143 t&i4 - l►t (J` 6 jr ftL , (ei. -r7z i` S 4 iZf ep"l_- tk-r ''r icvre.fr, 2011 -p So` 1 LACrIC :,77/ 7/-4 KIRK -4- Po r v--Y ,Z f s N Avv Vq �Lger l 13+ ti we, 1 I 0 vji Sti1IwaL S f MINEEJIA PLANNING REPORT MEETING DATE: November 8, 2016 CASE NO.: 2017-53 APPLICANT: Larry and Paulette Lappi, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of a re -subdivision and a Zoning Map Amendment (ZAM) for a track of undeveloped right-of-way adjacent to Elm Street PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND In August, 2017, MNDOT conveyed to Larry and Paulette Lappi a portion of undeveloped right-of-way located adjacent to Elm Street East that has been designated as Parks, Recreation, Open Space in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The approximately 125' long by 50' deep, 5,767 square foot of land was determined by MNDOT to be excess and eligible for private sale. While the Lappi's own the land, the City has not legitimized the creation of a new lot in this location yet. This is because the portion of land MNDOT conveyed to the Lappis is not a legal, conforming lot of record. In order for MNDOT's land to become a legal, conforming lot of record, a portion of it must be combined with a portion of the Lappi's property to create a lot that meets the minimum lot size required in the RB-Two Family Residential zoning district. City staff was approached by the Lappis in early 2016 about whether or not their property could be split into two parcels. Although it is bordered by North First Street on the west and Elm Street on the South, the property at 900 Broadway does not have enough buildable area outside of the steep slope areas to create a new lot. At that time city staff directed the property owners to MNDOT staff to discuss the potential purchase of MNDOT owned land near this intersection. In discussions with MNDOT, City Engineering, Public Works and Community Development staff determined there would be sufficient land adjacent to the platted Elm Street East for future roadway developments, extension of public utilities, as well as for snow plowing and storage were needed. However, staff advised the property owner the approval of a new developable lot would be determined by the City Council. SPECIFIC REQUEST Larry and Paulette Lappi, have submitted a two-part application for the City's consideration of: • The consideration of a Zoning Map Amendment (ZAM) of a track of undeveloped right-of-way adjacent to Elm Street East to be included in the RB - Two Family Residential zoning district; and • A resubdivision (otherwise referred to as a Lot Line Adjustment) that would create a new lot by combing MNDOT's excess land and a portion of the Lappis' homestead property. The Lappis property is located at 900 Broadway Street North. The new developable parcel of land would be approximately 16,795 square feet and contain a 1,820 square foot building pad. While the ZAM request must be heard by the Planning Commission in a public hearing, the re - subdivision request need only be considered by the City Council. Therefore, the Planning Commission's ZAM request recommendation will be heard before the City Council at the time of the re -subdivision request. REQUEST ANALYSIS Prior to approving a ZAM, the Commission must find that ■ The public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered; and • That the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. As noted, the 5,767 square foot piece of land previously owned by MNDOT has been determined to be excess land, eligible for sale in the private market. In and of itself, the land holds no value to any private landowner. Therefore, unless it can be combined with adjacent land to create a buildable lot, keeping the property as Parks, Recreation and Open Space makes sense. However, a 1,733 square foot portion of the Lappi's property could be combined with the former MNDOT parcel to create a 7,500 square foot buildable lot in the RB - Two Family Residential district. The Lappi's are choosing to combine 11,028 square feet for a total lot size of 16,795 square foot. While 5,703 square feet of the lot will be located on a steep slope, the remaining square footage will be outside of the slope area. The 1,820 square foot building pad accounts for lands outside of the 30' steep slope setback. This building lot area is in keeping with the building area for a property platted in this north hill neighborhood. Traditional lots are platted at 50' wide by 150' deep. As these 7,5000 square foot lots are permitted to have 25% maximum structural coverage, the building pad area is just slightly smaller than that of the neighborhood. According to City Attorney Magnuson, the land at the corner of First Street North and Elm Street East was once occupied by a house. The creation of an additional track of land in this location would legitimize a new buildable lot within the City, allowing for the creation of a new home in the future. As the lot and buildable lot area are consistent with adjacent properties in this neighborhood, the general community welfare would be furthered by rezoning the 5,767 of land to RB - Two Family Residential. There are no conflicts with this proposal and principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. ALTERNATIVES A. Approval If the Planning Commission finds the proposal, or a portion thereof, to be consistent with the provisions of ZAM, the Commission should forward a recommendation of approval. Case No. 2016-43 CPC: December 14, 2016 Page 2 of 3 B. Table If the Planning Commission finds that the application is not complete enough to make a decision, it could continue the review for additional information. C. Denial If the Planning Commission finds the proposal, or a portion thereof, is not consistent with the provisions of the ZAM regulations, the Commission should forward recommendation of denial to the City Council. The Commission should indicate a reason for such recommendation. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. As the property owner is proposing excess lands to be added to the adjacent RB - Two Family Residential district and all lot area requirements can be met if the property is approved to be combined with a portion of the Lappi property, then the public necessity and the general community welfare are furthered. Therefore, staff would recommend the Planning Commission recommend the rezoning of a 5,767 square foot of excess right-of-way adjacent to RB - Two Family residential. ATTACHMENTS Applicant Narrative Site Location Map Colored Survey Case No. 2016-43 CPC: December 14, 2016 Page 3 of 3 ,_ . r E SYCAMORE ST 0 S1ti The i Birthplace 1 (Water of Minnesota At . i `ram 1� H i ! i a w j NV Site Location Map o w ,{- 1 Ct_ Z i WEST ASPEN STREET " . 900 Broadway St N EAST ASPEN STREET z 1 1 0 0)z > i w Z = 1 Z 0 F'<1Sr 1 ECMST ti 1 / 7_ 1 a 0 270 540 1.080 Feet IL S d' H ,! General Site Location — DC CO iiirtzkler Z SIR"j GHOO� SCREE E SSRE� , e IESS MPP` S �PS� SPUR Z w 2 z %\ z 2 A S Z A -. \PORE\- N ° y \NESS o w 0 EES 2 1- 0 ERRS SSR o ti m co % a N� O _% 1 ! , I I 1 1 1 r I 1 •• 1 Z1 Irk ..� �; � .` .. . �'r. • cn Tr,�l1' y j sSR .A October 15, 2017 Abbi Jo Wittman City Planner City of Stillwater 216 4th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Ms. Wittman: We are requesting to combine Parcel 1, a 11,028 square foot portion of our 46,797 square foot property (PID# 28.030.20.12.0058) with our adjacent 5,767 square foot parcel (Certificate of Title 75363) into a buildable lot for a third party. The 5,767 square foot parcel was purchased from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) after determination by City Staff that combining this parcel from MNDOT with the aforementioned portion of our lot would meet all requirements for a new buildable lot. (Prior to our purchase of the parcel from MNDOT, City Staff provided input to MNDOT to ensure that the City's street right-of-way requirements would also be met along East EIm Street and North First Street.) The combined parcel will contain a total of 16,795 square -feet with 11,092 square feet having less than a 24% slope. The building pad area, within the setbacks on this proposed new buildable lot, is 1820 square feet. (See attached survey.) The parcel that we acquired from MNDOT, was originally zoned RB—Two Family District (RB- 2), but was changed to Parks, Recreation or Open Space (PROS) in 2011. We request that this parcel be rezoned back to RB-2. Electric, phone and gas services are available on the west side of First Street North. Sanitary sewer is available in First Street North and in EIm Street East. City water is located at the First Street North intersection with Wilkins Street East. It could be expensive to run City water to the new lot. The Board of Water Commissioners gave approval for a well on this new lot provided that: 1) Water usage will be metered for the purpose of sanitary sewer billing, and 2) Connection to City water will be made if and when City water becomes available. (See attached Board of Water Commissioners Minutes dated October 8, 2015.) Please let us know if you require additional information. Sincerely, Larry Lappi Paulette M. Lappi PO Box 283 Stillwater, MN 55082 Sheet. 1 of 3 Sheets Co r / ,St 19 1 Le, r2° rr ter 7 60 Rh., dr 40 any s w ti V h ti ,.-, '° ,' '' 4 G/r� ., �.L, .s. `1�ro v E. �' I / 40 1 l:14,,r — -, t, Cam. rri / 0. 7�'�F3f ���/ iliv -0 ZaT ¢ ,i: Z 's- ,45 V S 2 1/9C- (7(aAw/T/o t�i9[G'f 4,9Ciy TED .Tdn/� /,9, r D.eg /Vd. /6 L) .-a-.r n In-:r_-r 49,7c. ry /^/A/ 7/. a. I S 7d. f r - — ' 11.E r ri.f Ater, 44 pi �•f 71f- 2 ter ram'x4 - `�J rsr k V} J'- 1. r Ar',q" 1". EL M 1. T. gePO 3) / =.ao' k Notes: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Notes: Bearing system is assumed datum. "M." indicates measured value. "R." Indicates recorded value. Contours shown are based on field data obtained in August of 2017 and represents current site conditiors. 4'± to 8'± High wildflower plantings are inplace on portions of the overall parce). Contours are based on NGVD Vert. Datum. BARRETT M STACK o indicates 613774 iron mon. set. 5TILLWATER.MII4N 55082 • Indicates mon. found as noted. MINNESOTA REGISTERED Proposed Parcel 1 is ?art of the LING SURVEYOR. overall narcel as desc. an Cert, of (651) 4394630 Title No. 7]060. Said Parcel 1 is to be combined with the parcel desc. on Cert. of Title No. 75363 to create 1 (buildable parcel. City of Stillwater Lot Line Adj. approval is required to create this. parcel. SURVEY MADEEXCLUSIVELY FOR, Paulette M. Lappi and Larry R. Lappi, P 0 Box 283, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 DESCR1PTION' Existing Overall Parcel Description: (see Cert. of Title No. 71060) Add'1. Lappi Parcel Description: (per Cert. of Title No. 75363) Proposed Parcel 1 and Proposed Parcel 2 Descriptions are as proposed on Sheets 2 and 3. Additional Notes: Underground of Overhead, Public or private Utilities, on or adjacent the parcels, were not located in conjunction with this survey, unless shown or noted otherwise, Combined Parcels Overall Area: (Cert. Title Parcel 75363 and Proposed Parcel 1) Combined Overall Parcel Area: = 16,795 square feet (0.3856 Acre!) Comb. Parcel over 246 Grade: = 5,703 square feett. Comb. Parcel less 24± Grade: - 11,092 square feet±. Comb. Parcels Overall Area; = 16,795 square feet_±. Duildinq Pad Area = 1,820 square feet±. Building Setback Requirements: (As Supplied By the City of Stillwater) Front Setback: (street) 20 feet Side Setback: NA 248 Grade Setback: 30 feet rr, G 7a y cei V uv\&V , vMNDoT * v a ca 1, o �e a-Lo tAe d MIR COW VICE 64 `Y Y e/ Y1 !_/ v `e 1247 Mt,tDOT 0E1Na S ► wa% Wray �Q G�eve d n1 o I La 1Tvlor Toty* of °Do oael\N1 e �GvL��r�v�Gy z .>"))) ?voreA Acl elLf\ kAa261'e %— 41... F EXv,ki aL_ S-%vee-- Woad \,1 O 1 hereby ramify that this survey. plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct suprryiaion and that 1 ■m x duly Resirtered Lind Surveyor unrkr the Is. of the State of Minnesota. 9-5-2017 13774 Date Rrg.Ma... ........................ liwater THE BIRTH P L A TE OF MINESOJ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: November 8, 2017 CASE NO.: 2017-54 APPLICANT: Matthew and Katherine Jones, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of a 5' Variance to the side yard setback for the construction of a 16' x 18' rear deck. Matthew & Katherine Jones, property owners. ZONING: TR - Traditional Residential COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LDR: Low Density Residential PREPARED BY: Erik Olson -Williams, Zoning Administrator/Assistant Planner REQUEST & BACKGROUND Matthew and Katherine Jones are requesting a 5' variance to the required 10' Side Yard Setback for the construction of a rear deck, to be located 5' from the west property line. The design of the proposed deck is very similar to that of the deck constructed at 2680 White Pine Way, which did not require a Variance due to the orientation of the house on the lot. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND ANALYSIS The purpose of the variance is to "...allow variation from the strict application of the terms of the zoning code where the literal enforcement...would cause practical difficulties for the landowner." In addition to the requirements, below, Section 31-208 indicates "[n]onconforming uses or neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district or other districts may not be considered grounds for issuance of a variance" and "...a previous variance must not be considered to have set a precedent for the granting of further variances. Each case must be considered on its merits." Section 31-208 further indicates: • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. • A previous variance must not be considered to have set a precedent for the granting of further variances. Each case must be considered on its merits. The applicants must demonstrate that: The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. The general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code is to regulate and restrict use of land for the protection of public health, safety and welfare. The purposes of the Side Yard Setback are in part to maintain an open, unoccupied and uniform space for aesthetic and environmental benefits; and to provide separation between neighboring homes for light and air circulation, to provide sufficient space to maintain each home, to provide sufficient stormwater drainage. The proposed 5' setback is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning code. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. There are no elements of this proposal that are in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. "Practical difficulties," as use in connection with the granting of a variance, means that all of the following must be found to apply: The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls; The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner, as it is reasonable to have a deck in a residential area. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the landowner; and The location of the home on this property makes it impossible to construct the deck as proposed without a variance. The design of the deck could be altered to meet the Zoning requirements by moving the location of the exterior stairs, but the location of the existing doorway is not conducive to this adjustment. The applicants are the first occupants of the house but did not design or construct the house themselves. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Other houses in the subject property's neighborhood have rear decks of similar design, and the proposed deck will not be prominent from the street. The Variance, if granted, will be in conformance with the essential character of the locality. ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission has the following options: 1. Make the finding that practical difficulties do exist for the property owner and approve a 4'variance to the 20' Front Yard Setback [City Code Section 31-308(b)(1)] from the South property line for the construction of a 8' x 19' front porch, at the property located at 225 North Martha Street, with or without conditions. The Planning Commission may impose conditions in the granting of a variance. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Case No. 2017-54 CPC: 11/08/2017 Page 2 of 3 If the Commission were to find practical difficulties do exist for the property owner, staff would recommend the following conditions: a. Plans shall be substantially similar to those on file with the Community Development Department's Case No. 2017-54. b. Major exterior modifications to the variance permit request shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as per Section 31-204, Subd. 7. 2. Make the finding that practical difficulties have not been established and deny the variance, with or without prejudice. 3. Table the application and request additional information from staff or the applicants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION On the basis that practical difficulty has been established by the applicants and the proposed Variance will not alter the essential character of the locality, staff recommends approval of the Variance request. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative Request Proposed Site Plan Proposed Building Plan Proposed Elevation Case No. 2017-54 CPC: 11/08/2017 Page 3 of 3 we •••••••••••••SM•••••••••••••••=••••••••imi•••••••••••••••••••••••••• .. 0 Y.. .. .. ...M.................... 1 I 1Wa ter 40 Jr.. .._ . _ 4- 0111 0 - --I cc o z w - < z The Birthplace of Minnesota riti _r, NV Site Location Map POND CIR Jour* bk N. 'CA 4 4N kk HILL CRT 1)- \e FA\ \I a *-' _.1 m X X 2735 White Pine 270 540 Way 1 080 Feet 0 0 X Z WHITE PINE WAY uj General Site Location z < ii 1 0., — ..—• rawar-wiNsw, u mr,,..4,....... ialv...dimi.4 wi . , , • , . ' , is4,4 • a /-p 42,, <,- , "`-'),e' c '''ree .'-` • _ h'i- '.....7 A g,:* „ i. 1 ' , ., t LTJ i , / , I, / ' ...v,u, kuSIC3• d, i•e se - .0 , os 114.' 4$.10 01.4, 4 A .>/ t.._3 4 ,i"'',.,._' 1 v', CIIPO4UNTY .1.• tt;It-T te 8 , r • • i 1 . is', •G ii , ›.-••••=., ... , IWHVIlmitevi' ..,,..iiii. - LT1q- • '• • I 1.111. 5 I : t*ii • • if • \\. \ r • Dear Planning Commission Members, We ask that you grant a variance for 2735 White Pine Way to be able to build steps off of a deck up to 5 feet from the property line. The angle of the house and the exits on the main floor and walk out basement, located on the far edge of the house, make it nearly impossible to build an average sized deck and patio without building inside the building setback area. The house sits at an angle on the lot to allow for the driveway to exit onto the street away from the median and crosswalk that is directly in front of our home. Though we are the first owners to live in the house, we purchased the house already completed from Lennar. We did not anticipate that there would be challenges in completing a deck that fits with the layout of the house. The deck design is nearly identical to the design of our neighbor's deck two houses down and would be built by the same construction company. As proposed, the stairs come down at the ideal location where they do not block views out of the finished basement or the proposed screened in patio space under the deck. They will also be well placed not to interfere with the additional gardens and patio space yet to be planned along the remaining back of the house. The placement will not impact the neighbors in any way. Thank you for your consideration, Matthew and Katherine Jones 0 2 0 r 0,9 —5 0 1A O1 03 2 Proposed grades shown adjacent to building foundation rcfcn to top of black din. Vcrify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work N O Z▪ zZS/ 9p,9ZoS/N N N 9 /: co / • VEY LEGEND 22nd day ofJune, 2016. d N ncsota License No 26147 5 s0 Section 19 - Township 030 - Range 020 >- W CC (/) • m ¢ LL Q O O zo W 1-O ▪ F-a LL j a p O cc LL U 2 3 Q0 0 Q z 0 DATE: 06-15-16 6 erret arsor • 7/ -47 'MAO -- ( or) A / ‘f I31 AA 3IISSIPE AVM Mal E VITLniv® I11 J � o8/9 m-�I Or/£ b-.I (�-1 it8/I1-,8 „8/I I-.6 alla1 °I 191 Z 0 I— e fllwater r i+ - H, R T H P L A C E OF- MINNESOTA PLANNING REPORT MEMO DATE: November 3, 2017 HEARING DATES: Planning Commission Park Commission Joint Planning Board City Council CASE NO.: 2017-56 November 8, 2017 November 27, 2017 November 30, 2017 December 5 & December 19, 2017 LANDOWNER: Randy & Judy Petrie DEVELOPER: Greg Johnson, Hearth Development, LLC CIVIL ENGINEER: Todd Erickson, PE REQUEST: 1) Rezone to TR, Traditional Residential 2) Preliminary Plat approval of Nottingham Village, a 15 lot Single Family Residential Subdivision LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWED BY: 12220 McKusick Road PLAN: LDR, Low Density Residential Shawn Sanders, City Engineer; Abbi Wittman, City Planner; Tom Ballis, Assistant Fire Chief; Jenn Sorensen, DNR Area Hydrologist; Anne Terwedo; Washington County Public Works Karen Kill, Administrator, Brown's Creek Watershed District REPORT BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director BACKGROUND Greg Johnson, Hearth Development, LLC, plans to develop 5.30 acres' of property located at 1220 McKusick Road. The preliminary plat for the project, to be known as Nottingham Village, shows 15 single family lots that are requested to be zoned TR, Traditional Residential. ' 5.30 gross acres, including right of way for County Road. There are 4.745 acres excluding the right of way. Nottingham Village November 3, 2017 Page 2 The site is located amongst large unsewered lots that were developed while the neighborhood was located in Stillwater Township. (See attached Neighborhood Map.) Generally speaking, the neighborhood lies just east of Manning Avenue (County Road 15) between McKusick Road (County Road 64) and Brown's Creek. SPECIFIC REQUEST In order to develop the property as proposed, the applicant has requested approval of the following: 1. Rezoning of the property to TR, Traditional Residential 2. Preliminary Plat known as Nottingham Village for 15 single family lots EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. REZONING Mr. Johnson has requested that the property be zoned TR, Traditional Residential. It is currently zoned AP, Agricultural Preservation, which is the temporary zoning classification assigned by the Minnesota Municipal Board when the area was annexed in 2015. The expectation is that when development occurs, the property would be rezoned to a classification that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The requested TR zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which guides development of the site and neighborhood as Low Density Residential. The Zoning Districts that are consistent with the Low Density Residential classification are: TR, RA, LR band CTR. Incidentally, the TR zoning is the same as Brown's Creek Preserve, which is a recently developed subdivision directly across McKusick Road from the subject property. (See the attached zoning map.) II. PRELIMINARY PLAT A. Minimum Dimensional Standards: TR District Nottingham Village November 3, 2017 Page 3 TR District - Dimensional Standards Standard Min. requirement Proposed Lot area 10,000 sf avg 10,485 sf (8,258 - 21,964 sf) Lot width2 65' Min 65' Lot depth3 NA' Min 118.7' Lot frontage 35' Min 36' Lot frontage on public road 35' Min 65' Front setback 20' 20' typical Setback from McKusick 100' 100' Side setback house 10' Min 10' Side setback garage 5' Min 5' Garage setback, front loaded4 27' Min 27 Garage setback, side loaded 20' Min 20 Rear setback for house 25' Lot 1, B13 = 10' All others min 25' The house layout on Lot 1, Block 3 will require a rear yard setback variance if built as shown on Sheet C3 in the attached plan set. Since the porch and front of the house face the west lot line, the east lot line is the rear line. A setback of 25 feet is therefore required from the east lot line. Only 10 feet is shown. However, if the floor plan is revised so that the porch and front of house are oriented toward the south lot line, then the setbacks for the house on this lot are fine. Staff has included this floor plan change as a condition of preliminary plat approval. As seen in the table each minimum standard is maintained. No variances are necessary. However, the house layout on Lot 1, Block 3 will have to be revised to avoid the need for a rear yard setback variance. A TR subdivision is normally part of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). 50% of a PUD is required to be open space. So, normally the amount of green space to be found in a TR subdivision is not a concern. But, this TR subdivision (like Brown's Creek Preserve on the south side of McKusick Road) is not a PUD. Therefore, impervious surface should be looked at in more detail. The percent of impervious surface should be calculated for each lot prior to approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. If there is more than 30% impervious surface on each lot, the Council should consider mitigation requirements. 2 Width is measured between side lot lines at right angles to lot depth at a point midway between front and rear lot lines 3 average distance between front and rear lot lines. 4 In addition to the 27' minimum garage setback, 75% of the garages in the subdivision have to be set 6' behind the front of the house. Nottingham Village November 3, 2017 Page 4 B. Civil Engineering 1. The public street being constructed by the developer will connect 87th Street North to McKusick Road (County Road 64). However, since access management is necessary on all county roads, only a temporary connection to County Road 64 will be allowed for this subdivision. The permanent connection will need to be opposite Macey Way, which will be located on the neighbor's property to the east. (See attached plans for details.) When the permanent access to McKusick Road is built, then the temporary connection in Nottingham Village will have to be removed. An escrow will be required of this developer to cover the future cost of that removal. 2. All of the preliminary civil engineering plans shall be found satisfactory to the City Engineer, or revised to his satisfaction, prior to submission of the final plat application. 3. All electrical and communication utility lines are required to be buried. 4. A permit will be required from Washington County for work within their right of way. The City is required to get this permit. So, the developer will have to provide the information for the City to complete the permit application. 5. Removal of the existing temporary cul-de-sac on 87th St North will be required of the developer. 6. Development impact fees will have to be paid prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. Based upon the net developable acreage, the fees will be as follows: a. Trout Stream Mitigation Fee of $5,912 per acre. i. Credit can be given for the existing house. Assuming the average lot size of 10,000 square feet (0.230 acres), then only 4.515 net acres would be required to pay the fee. Therefore, a total of $26,692.68 would be due for the Trout Stream Mitigation Fee. b. North Area transportation mitigation fee of $7,686 per acre. i. Credit can be given for the existing house. Assuming the average lot size of 10,000 square feet (0.230 acres), then only 4.515 net acres would be required to pay the fee. Therefore, a total of $34,702.29 would be due for the Transportation Mitigation Fee. c. Boutwell West trunk sewer and water fees of $10,608.00 per acre. i. Credit cannot be given for the existing home, since it is on a private well and septic system. Therefore, a total of $50,334.96 would be due for the sewer and water trunk charges.5 Since trunk fees are required, hook-up fees will not be charged at time of building permit application. Nottingham Village November 3, 2017 Page 5 C. Tree Preservation & Landscaping Two development standards exist for this subdivision: 1) street trees, and 2) tree preservation. 1. Street Trees The subdivision code requires an average of three street trees per lot6. The landscape plan shows 32, though 45 are required. Therefore, landscape plan needs to be revised to show the remaining 13 trees in back yards. Or a tree replacement fee will need to be paid for these 13 trees. The fee would be based upon the retail cost of a 2" DBH deciduous tree. 2. Tree preservation All 29 significant trees on the property will be removed. a. No protected slopes exist on the site. So, the prohibition on removing trees from steep slopes does not apply. b. The City's environmental ordinances would allow 35% of the tree stock to be taken down. Since 100% is being removed, replacement is required. i. One tree is required for each tree removed beyond the 35% threshold. Of the 29 significant trees on the site, 10 could be removed without replacement. Since all 29 are being removed, 19 will need to be replaced. ii. The size of the 19 replacement trees must be an average of 2 inches diameter at about four feet above ground. Conifers must be at least 6 feet tall. iii. The subdivision code allows a tree replacement fee to be paid if they cannot be planted on site. The fee would be based upon the retail cost of a 2" DBH deciduous tree. D. Park and Trail Dedication The Comprehensive Plari s park element shows no planned park or trails on or through the property. Therefore, standard practice would be to require a fee in lieu of land or improvements. The Park Commission is scheduled to review the plans on November 27, 2017. If the Park Commission recommends requiring fees in lieu of land or improvements, then park and trail fees will be due on 14 of the 15 lots. The 6 City Code Ch 32, Subd. 6(3)q Nottingham Village November 3, 2017 Page 6 park fee for a single family home is $2,000 and the trail fee is $500. The existing home is exempted. Therefore, $35,000 would be due for the park and trail fees at the time the final plat is released for recording with Washington County. E. Environmental Considerations Wetlands - The property has no wetlands. BCWD - A grading permit is required from Brown's Creek Watershed District prior to submittal of the final plat application. Floodplain - The property includes no FEMA identified floodplains. Shoreland Overlay District - The shoreland overlay district for Brown's Creek lies just outside the subject property. (See attached zoning map). ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is requested to review and make a recommendation to the City Council on the rezoning and preliminary plat. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, and rezoning with the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the following plans on file with the Community Development Department, except as may be modified by the conditions herein: • Site Layout Plan Sheet C3 dated 11/3/17 • Grading Plan Sheet C4 dated 11/3/17 • Utility Plan Sheet C5 dated 11/3/17 • Landscape Plan Sheet LI dated 11/3/17 2. All civil engineering plans shall be found satisfactory to the City Engineer, or revised to his satisfaction, prior to final plat application. 3. Removal of the existing temporary cul-de-sac on 87th St North will be required of the developer. The letter of credit, or other public improvement security as approved in the Development Agreement for the project, will not be released until this work is completed. 4. An escrow for removal of the temporary street connection to McKusick Road, in an amount found satisfactory to the City Engineer, shall be deposited with the City prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. 5. The percentage of impervious surface must be calculated for each lot prior to approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. If there is more than 30% impervious surface on each lot, the Council should consider mitigation requirements. 6. A Development Agreement found satisfactory to the City Attorney and City Engineer must be approved by the City Council prior to commencing any tree removal or grading Nottingham Village November 3, 2017 Page 7 on the site, and prior to holding a pre -construction meeting with the City Engineer for the project. 7. A permit will be required from Washington County for work within their right of way. The City will be required to submit the permit application. Therefore, the developer will have to submit all necessary information to the City to complete the permit application. This information must be submitted to the City by the developer prior to release of the final plat for recording at Washington County. 8. The developer shall submit a grading permit application to Brown's Creek Watershed District, and the permit must be issued prior to submitting the application to the City for the final plat. Any permit conditions that the City Engineer finds necessary to include in the final plan set shall be included in the final plat application package. 9. A total of $35,000 shall be paid to the City for park and trail dedication fees. These fees shall be submitted to the City prior to release of the final plat for filing with the County. 10. All electrical and communications utility lines shall be buried. This shall be specified in the plans submitted for final plat approval. 11. The Developer will be responsible for paying the Trout Stream Mitigation Fee of $26,692.68; the Transportation Mitigation Fee of $34,702.29; and trunk sewer and water fees of $50,334.96. These fees will be due prior to release of the final plat for recording with Washington County. 12. Prior to releasing the final plat for filing with Washington County, the landscape plan must be revised to show 13 more street trees. . In the alternative, the cash equivalent of those 13 trees may be submitted to the city. (Any such cash equivalent would be calculated based upon the retail cost of a 2" DBH deciduous tree). 13. Prior to releasing the final plat for filing with Washington County, the landscape plan must be revised to show 19 replacement trees for the removal of all existing significant trees on the property. In the alternative, the cash equivalent of those 19 trees may be submitted to the city. (Any such cash equivalent would be calculated based upon the retail cost of a 2" DBH deciduous tree). 14. If the Developer desires to have a neighborhood entrance monument for the subdivision, plans for it must be included within the final plat application materials. Otherwise, such a sign will not be permitted in the future. 15. The floor plan for Lot 1, Block 3 must be changed so that the porch and front of the house are oriented toward the south lot line. In the alternative, a variance will need to requested and granted by the City prior to issuance of the building permit for this lot. cc Greg Johnson Todd Erickson Attachments: Zoning Map Neighborhood Map Development Plans J I �( Nottingham Village Zoning Districts Brown's Creek Shoreland District A-P, Agricultural Preservation RA - Single Family Residential RB - Two Family TR, Traditional Residential LR, Lakeshore Residential CR, Cottage Residential CTR, Cove Traditional Residential CCR, Cove Cottage Residential CTHR, Cove Townhouse Residential TH, Townhouse RCM - Medium Density Residential RCH - High Density Residential VC, Village Commercial CA - General Commercial CBD - Central Business District BP-C, Business Park - Commercial BP-O, Business Park - Office BP -I, Business Park - Industrial IB - Heavy Industrial CRD - Campus Research Development in PA - Public Administration PROS - Park, Recreation or Open Space Public Works Facility ROAD WATER Brown's Creek Trail j Nottingham Village Neighborhood Map All Rights Reserved © 2017 - T. Erickson, LLC - Ericks 1\TOTTINGHAM VILLA GE S TILLWATER, 'VIINNESOTA SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL ZONING NOVEMBER 3, 2017 t-) A I\ InnKK A ()I' E) A K I/�I IF—TTf I \ni NU\JIVI uI \L_L_1 \ I \nl N\f 1L_ I 1 L_., rein YYLIS^;-, ITI /'\T \JIIIL_'J1 Li McKusick Road North 60 0 60 120 180 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE Site Location Map Section 19, T3ON - R2OW Washington County, Minnesota PLAN SHEET INDEX: SHEET NO. SHEET ID DESCRIPTION 1 OF 5 C1 TITLE SHEET 2 OF 5 C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 OF 5 C3 SITE LAYOUT/ LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE PLAN 4 OF 5 C4 GRADING PLAN 5 OF 5 C5 UTILITY PLAN 1 OF 1 L1 TREE PRESERVATION AND LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 OF 1 Si BOUNDARY SURVEY ERICIiSON CIVIL 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone (612) 309-3804 www.ericksoncivilsite.com DRAWING PHASE: OWNER REVIEW t% AGENCY REVIEW BID DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT DOCUMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STA F MINNESOTA. • T .DD A. RICKSON, PE 40418 LICENSE NO. 11/03/2017 DATE: OWNER/DEVELOPER PROJECT TITLE DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 0 z JOB NO. 17-146 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NO. C 1 15 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SHEET 1 OF 5 A /\ r)t)r-^ri D\ ir /—\ \ 7 1 \ L_ O 14_ 1 \ V L_ \IJVVL_L_ 1 A /\ r)i—)r-/r-1=)\ /r— ) 1 \L_I \ V L_ 15' FES INV. 917.9 VffitilIVMENIVVMMIIIMEIVI '1 r) A N Ir1/1N A r )r-r- ) A I\ I( I Jr -1-mr- �� — I \/—\I NU\JIVI— ul \L_L_[ — I—\t \-t �C1L_ I I L_, G i IAIr-IC; / / V V L_ I J V / 'I r\ 15"FES / Ili ^IN IL /1�)1 INV. 923.6 LL11 N1 VI \V _ N89°19'53"W 342.10 A /\ r)I_)I--;lr-I_)\ ir_— /—\\) I I \ V I__ - w ________ -922" LL 0 w cs? co -_-_, �� / Q w w 920- - _ _ ww 0 w J p AC PPESEPv1E o �i cwn t Di\ �nff N ui\r)� i\i\r\1 \o \ / CO ) 1 / I / \ / \ I 19 A2.91 15"FES < INV. 916.9 ran IL) TL) A II LlINI\ I I\r\IL_ k M I \ 115" FES IN,V. 910.71) I Ir-N IT/1n 1 11-1L_I N 1 vI N 15' FES INV. 909.2 15" FES INV.910.4 ) D 15" FES 21. INV. 909.7 40 Legend 0 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE 120 FEET PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING 2-FT CONTOUR EXISTING STORM SEWER (ALL CMP) ITI® EXISTING WATERMAIN (DIP CL. 52) r.'♦'♦'♦-♦�♦'v 0 e81 Keyed Notes EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (PVC SDR 26) EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVAL EXISTING BUILDING REMOVAL EXISTING TREE >6" IN DIAMETER TO BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE PROJECT. SOIL BORING LOCATION REMOVAL OF EXISTING SIDEWALK APRON AND TRAIL FOR SANITARY AND WATER EXTENSION EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED / REPLACED FOR WATER AND SEWER EXTENSION EXISTING CULVERT END MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER EXTENSION REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT AND DRIVEWAY APRON IN ITS ENTIRETY SAWCUT EXISTING BIT. PRIOR TO ANY REMOVAL OPERATION PROTECT EXISTING COUNTY HIGHWAY DURING CONSTRUCTION COUNTY WORK WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG WITH TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE WITH OWNER ON TIMES/DATES FOR DRIVEWAY CLOSURE TREES TO REMAIN (PROTECT) Notes 1) BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY PJ LAND SURVEYING 2) TOTAL PARCEL AREA AS SHOWN = 4.75 ACRES ERICKSON CIVIL 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone (612) 309-3804 www.ericksoncivilsite.com DRAWING PHASE: OWNER REVIEW AGENCY REVIEW BID DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT DOCUMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AT DD A. ERICKSON, PE 40418 LICENSE NO. 11/03/2017 DATE: puvointrjmnmos ligjinsiorro w 0 MILIMMIIMMIKMMEILME 0 JOB NO. 17-146 SHEET TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NO. C2 SHEET 2 OF 5 it - All Rights Reserved © 2017 - T. Erickson, LLC - Er o+00 7th Street ort )f\\AI1 r-\/ \IJVVL_L_ I T) A N Innl\ ���=)� L <' i_) A N I/I IF—TTF \/-\I NLJUIVI UI \L_L_( \ I \/-\I NUC1L_ 1 I L__; S-(:I 'RR 8,345 sq.ft. Front House 8,258 sq.ft. 10,347 sq.ft. 3-Car Garage House 3-Car Garage 9,218 sq.ft. House 3-Car Garage 9,155 sq.ft. House 3-Car Garage 9,851 sq.ft. House 3-Car Garage 21,964 sq.ft. House 100-FT SETBACK INFILTRATION BASIN n IlJ N89°19'53"W 34210 3-Car Garage PT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT S88°56'19"E 152.91 = 3+29.12 3-Car Garage 9,527 sq.ft. House 28-FT F-F Garage 2-Car House 3-Car Garage JHouse PC = 4 18.05 PT=4 71. 3-Car Garage House 8,866 sq.ft. 60-FT RIW House 9,293 sq.ft. Garage 2-Car 8,367 sq.ft. House 8,643 sq.ft. 9,169 sq.ft. Garage 3-Car House 1+00 28-FTIF-F 60-FT RAN Front I_ 3-Car Garage 14,002 sq.ft. 3-Car Garage House 12,267 sq.ft. STORV1 POND DRAINAGE &IUTILITY EASEMENT S88°51'28"E 187.37 - r\N 1^ T^ Al w w 0 LL M CO rn U) w w U_ 0 LLI J 1- v) w FUTURE ROAD CONNECTION I Ir-n rrr'.r 1 E1L_I N 1 \JI N 40 0 40 80 120 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE Legend 11 PROPERTY BOUNDARY Street lights shall be Xcel Energy 100 HPS, California Acorn (black in color) with 15-ft black aluminum poles UTILITY EASEMENT 20-FT FRONT BUILDING SETBACK (SIDE & REAR LISTED BELOW) PROPOSED STREET SIGN PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Development Standards - TR Average lot area (when part of a PUD) Lot width Lot depth Front yard setback House Garage (front facing) Garage (side facing) Side yard setback Interior House Garage Corner House Garage Rear yard setback House Garage Frontage requirement Maximum garage area 10,000 square feet (Project =10,485 Sq. Ft.) 65 feet NA 20 feet 27 feet 20 feet 10 feet 5 feet, 3 feet if in rear yard 15 feet 20 feet 25 feet 3 feet 35 feet 1,000 square feet Height Main building/accessory building 2'/2 stories, not to exceed 35 feet Garages, accessory building 1 story, not to exceed 20 feet FRONT OF LOT 10' 5' 2 REAR F LOT 5' TYPICAL EASEMENT DETAIL LOT LENGTH LOT WIDTH AT REAR OF LOT BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER AREA OF LOT IN SQUARE FEET LOT WIDTH AT RIGHT OF WAY TYPICAL LOT DETAIL ERICKSON CIVIL 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone (612) 309-3804 www.ericksoncivilsite.com DRAWING PHASE: OWNER REVIEW t% AGENCY REVIEW BID DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT DOCUMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STAT F MINNESOTA TJAD A. RICKSON, PE 40418 LICENSE NO. 11/03/2017 DATE: OWNER/DEVELOPER PROJECT TITLE DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 0 JOB NO. 17-146 SHEET TITLE SITE LAYOUT, LIGHTING AND SIGNING PLAN SHEET NO. C3 SHEET 3 OF 5 it - All Rights Reserved © 2017 - T. Erickson, LLC - Ericks r-I/1E)ITT(\ I'.J I \ I I 1 lJ /1 ITI r T \_/ lJ I L _ V I Dr\\A11 r-\i \ IJ V V L _ L_ I 415' FES INV. 916.9 v 15' FES INV. 923.6 ,924-___, L) A N Innl\ A —F-1/ L) A I \/-\I VU�/IVI® mil \L_LLr - I I L_ 1A1r-I^^ VV L_ INV. 923.5 T INV. 922.15 1+00 0.60% G TOB 924.5 GTB 924.5 BFE 915.5 922 gig p0 ' FIB 916 _ N89°19'53"W 34210 914 912 911- 910 INV. 916.00 MP HYD.4- 922 co co CO N CO N � � b O O CI CO CO 010101 G TOB 918.0 GTB 918.0 BFE 909.0 TOB GTB BFE FIB FIB w 1- LL 0 LI_ co M CO rn 0) w w L I_ 0 w Z 0) w CY) U w CO w 1- LL_ 0 w - C!) / _ —914 INV. 915.30 - _ * INV. 912.70 INV. 911.20 p l� INI\ I I \nIL_ 15' FES INV. 909.2 40 LEGEND 0 40 80 120 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE 922.85 LP I HP EOF -1050 - 0.74°// 2ND ADDITION BOUNDARY EXISTING 2-FT CONTOUR INTERVAL HIGH OR LOW POINT OF STREET PROFILE LOCATION AND ELEVATION HP = HIGH POINT, LP = LOW POINT, EOF = EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROPOSED 2-FT CONTOUR INTERVAL PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW PROPOSED STREET GRADE PERCENT AND DIRECTION al PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND STRUCTURES GRADING NOTES: 1) SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE ALL GUTTER LINE OR FINISHED ELEVATION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2) ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS SHOWN AS FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. D&U EASEMENT @ 100 YEAR HWL OR STORM EASEMENT TYPE OF BUILDING W/O = WALK OUT BASEMENT L/O = LOOK OUT BASEMENT FIB = FULL BASEMENT LOWEST OPENING W/0 = BFE LIO = BFE + 3.5-FT R = BFE + 3.5-ft FOR EGRESS WINDOW (BFE = BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATON) TOB 927 5 GTB 927.5 BFE 918.5 G LOT GRADING DETAIL LOT LINE (TYP.) TOP OF BLOCK GARAGE TOP OF BLOCK BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION "G" DESIGNATION DEFINES GARAGE LOCATION (HIGH SIDE OF LOT) ERICKSON CIVIL 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone (612) 309-3804 www.ericksoncivilsite.com DRAWING PHASE: OWNER REVIEW t% AGENCY REVIEW BID DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT DOCUMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STAT F MINNESOTA PT DD A. RICKSON, PE 40418 LICENSE NO. 11/03/2017 DATE: OWNER/DEVELOPER PROJECT TITLE DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 0 JOB NO. 17-146 SHEET TITLE GRADING PLAN SHEET NO. C4 SHEET 4 OF 5 15" FES INV. 923.6 ID: SMH 9 RE: 923. IE: 900.12 0+00 INV. 900.32 87th Street iVor th r-I/l:)ITT\ I iv' \I 1 1 v I \v VV L_L_ 1 it - All Rights Reserved © 2017 - T. Erickson, LLC - E 415" FES INV. 916.9 T) A fN In/11\ A ( T)r-r-R<' E) A IN I( I Ir-T�r I\/ -\I NDUIV1 ul\L_L_C\ I\ I I L_._; IAIr-I^^ VV NV. 923.5 INV. 922.15 $8 L.F. R" PVC 8" Dip WMSDR 26 @ 0.50% ID: CBMH 5 RE: 917.24 IE: 913.74 ID: SMH 4 RE: 916.95 IE: 897.47 ID: CB 2 RE: 915.85 IE: 912.50 4-FT SUMP INV. 916.00 ■ HYD. 15" RCP ID: SMH 7 RE: 922.21 IE: 899.10 ID: SMH 6 RE: 920.68 IE: 898.60 ID: CBMH 4 RE: 917.24 IE: 913.54 ID: STMH 3 RE: 916.70 ID: CBMH 4 IE: 912.60 RE: 916.00 IE: 912.75 -FT SUMP 150 L.F. 8" P,VC SDR 26@0'.40% to ID: CB 5 RE: 916.00 IE: 913.00 4-FT SUMP ID: CBMH 1 RE: 915.85 IE: 912.20 4-FT SUMP AH 1 4" RCP ID: SMH 3 RE: 917.26 IE: 896.49 INV. 912.00 INV. 912.00 INV. 915.30 ran IL) TL) A II LJI NI \ I I \/1IL_ ID: CB 5 RE: 917.10 IE: 913.60 4-FT SUMP CB 6 ID: SMH 5 RE: 918.00 IE: 898.17 346 DIP WM t- INV. 912.70 INV. 911.20 p ( QINV. 910.90 - e e ce O m J O F- U W ce 15" FES 15" FES INV.910.7pC.1INV. 909.7 D: SMH 1 RE: 913.80 IE: 892.79 Q 15" FES INV. 909.2 40 0 40 80 120 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE Legend PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT C PROPOSED 8" PVC (SDR 26) SANITARY SEWER • ® 4 PROPOSED RCP STORM SEWER m PROPOSED 8" DIP WM CL. 52 WATER MAIN, HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE CC Q EXISTING STORM SEWER Keyed Notes ITI® EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER 0 to CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WITH BOX TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE TO TRAIL, ETC. JACK/BORE SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CROSSING (USE C-900 FOR BOTH PIPES) SALVAGE AND REINSTALL EXISTING CULVERT USE BOX IN HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF EXCAVATION ERICKSON CIVIL 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone (612) 309-3804 www.ericksoncivilsite.com DRAWING PHASE: OWNER REVIEW t% AGENCY REVIEW BID DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT DOCUMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STAT F MINNESOTA T DD A. RICKSON, PE 40418 LICENSE NO. 11/03/2017 DATE: H z 0 F--1 x OWNER/DEVELOPER U c4 M H Cf) PROJECT TITLE JOB NO. 17-146 SHEET TITLE UTILITY PLAN SHEET NO. C5 SHEET 5 OF 5 w / 15" FES „INV. 923.6 .+00 87th Street North r-I(1j)ITT(1 1 I\JI \I I 1 V Dn1All r-\/ I\\JVVL_L_ 1 15" FES INV. 917.9 415 FES INV. 916.9 j) A N A I-)r—r—I<' I—) A N I(1 J1'TTE I \/—\I \U\/IVI— -\U1 �L=LC \ — L_ I 1 L_ INV. 922.15 Lill NI vi \U _ N89°19'53"W 342.10 INV. 916.00 MI HYD.-V- 11 INV. 915.30 r1N1c) TD)AII UI NI \ I I \rnIL_ w U_ 0 U_ CO CO rn Ww 0 w — w U w Z w U- 0 w N 1 N INV. 912.70 115" FES INV. 910.7D I Irnrrr'r 1 I r1L_I N 1 \JI N 15' FES INV. 910.4 15" FES 1 INV. 909 77 _ 40 0 40 80 120 FEET GRAPHIC SCALE Legend PLANTING SCHEDULE PROPERTY BOUNDARY 15-FT POLE WITH ORNAMENTAL LIGHT, XCEL ENERGY "ACRON" LAMP. UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE (2 YEAR WARRANTY) PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREE (2 YEAR WARRANTY) OVERSTORY TREES Latin Name Quantity Size Type Notes SJ Scarlet Jewel Maple Acer rubrum 'Scarlet Jewel' 4 2-1/2' Dia. 5+8 AB Autumn Blaze Maple Acer x freemanii 'Jeffersred 8 2-1/2' Dia. 8+5 BO Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor 4 2-1/2' Dia. 8+8 WO White Oak Quercus alba 5 2-1/2' Dia. 8+8 RB River- Birch Betula nigra 4 1O—ft 5+5 WS White Spruce Picea glauca G 8—ft B+B THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE PLUMBNESS OF TREES THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD, THEREFORE STAKING IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DISCRETION. POLY STRAP 2/3 UP TREE OR TO 1ST BRANCH. DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. GUY WIRE. FLAG (ONE PER WIRE). TREE WRAP. 3" SOIL SAUCER AROUND TREE. nnWununllibilM111111111ll�111111llln""'" • Illllllllllllllllllllllllllnllppl!10ij!unw BALL DIA. + 24" DO NOT CUT LEADER. GALVANIZED TURNBUCKLE. OPTIONAL, SEE SPECS. GUYING CABLE @ 3 GUYS PER TREE AS REQUIRED. OPTIONAL, SEE SPECS. FINISH GRADE BEFORE BACKFILLING. CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, AND/ OR WIRE FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. SEE PLAN FOR MULCH TYPE EXISTING GRADE. TOP OF ROOT BALL SHALL BE 3" ABOVE GUYING STAKE TO BE DRIVEN BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLANTING MIXTURE. SEE SPECS. LOOSEN HARDPAN (8" MIN.) STAKE TO BE 18" BELOW TREE PIT IN UNDISTURBED GROUND. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING ERICKSON CIVIL 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone (612) 309-3804 www.ericksoncivilsite.com DRAWING PHASE: OWNER REVIEW ti AGENCY REVIEW BID DOCUMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AS -BUILT DOCUMENT OWNER/DEVELOPER HEARTH DEVELOPMENT 3300 RICE ST. ST. PAUL, MN 55126 PROJECT TITLE NOTTINGHAM VILLAGE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA w H Q 0 REVISION DESCRIPTION 0 z JOB NO. 17-146 SHEET TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NO. Li SHEET 1 OF 1 iliwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINNESOIA PLANNING REPORT MEETING DATE: November 8, 2017 CASE NO.: 2017-57 APPLICANT: Juanita Pekay, representing St. Croix Village, LLC, property owner REQUEST: Request for an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for a five foot tall, chain -link fence to replace the existing privacy fence at 1677 Orleans Street West. ZONING: RCM - Medium Density Residential COMP PLAN DISTRICT: HDR - High Density Residential PREPARED BY: Erik Olson -Williams, Zoning Administrator/Assistant Planner APPLICANT REQUEST Juanita Pekay has applied for an amendment to an existing Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for a five foot tall, chain -link fence to replace the existing privacy fence at 1677 Orleans Street West on behalf of the property owner, St. Croix Village, LLC. The existing fence is failing and needs to be replaced. Special Use Permit #95-60, allowing for a multi -family dwelling at this property, requires that a fence "non -climbable in design" be placed between the development and the residential properties to the north. The proposed fence is not considered to be non -climbable in design, as it is shorter than the current fence and is constructed out of chain -link material. Per the applicant's narrative, the reason for the change in fence design, is cost effectiveness and durability. The applicant states that oil capable of ruining clothing may be placed on the top of the fence to deter climbing. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES AND FINDINGS The purpose of specially permitted uses is to allow the integration of essential or desirable uses which may be suitable only in certain zoning districts or designed or arranged on a site in a certain manner. In approving an amendment to a special use permit or conditional use permit, it must be determined by the planning commission that: • The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations; • Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed; and • The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION Municipal Code Section 31-207 indicates the following must be determined by the Planning Commission prior to the amendment of a Special Use Permit: The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. Based on Planning Commission minutes from the time of the permit's issuance, Staff believes that the intent of the fence condition of the permit was two -fold. First, to prevent children living in the multi -family dwelling from entering adjacent properties. And second, to provide a privacy screen for the single family neighborhood. Allowing a chain -link fence would not be in conformity with the intent of this condition. Staff also believes the fence was intended to act as screening, which a chain -link fence will not do. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed; and Staff has not identified any public interest concerns. If the proposed fence is constructed, oil should not be used as a deterrent, as deterring climbing in this manner is not in the public interest. The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. A fence that is climbable in design could constitute a public nuisance if used by children to enter neighboring properties. ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION The Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the Special Use Permit amendment with or without conditions 2. Deny the Special Use Permit amendment 3. Table the request for more information Staff recommends the Commission deny the request for a Special Use Permit amendment on the grounds that a chain -link fence is not in compliance with the intent of the original Special Use Permit, and the use of oil to deter climbing is not in the public interest. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Applicant Narrative Request Fence Project Expense Report Case No. 2017-57 CPC: 11/08/2017 , . i / r lillw ater f = ANoE The Birthplace of Minnesota +eye u_4'' E J -��!• r — -ill PARK - _ • - -- TROTTER CT "E Ey 2 ,? Site Location Map 1677 Orleans St W ,�.. • m HIGHLAND C1 m 7 O I p O OP .. �(�• m m O ,i _ ', r' z DRI G PARK -R mW Mal !i1 • 4W e. �*'•` �1 WEST ORLEANS STREETWE j 0, .' -'�-, p 7'4 ; SEAAiS&STREET ' _ H 1 1 °+' alFeet N Jam'_. I ,iu� _ 0 320 640 28 eyoLu Cr _ r gpU`�\iPFtO - '" —. - 1 General Site Location 1.1 NI i CURVE 4 OREST i��� "" ' • i • O i OD • Z _• ~:�ameam. ���iiyy ui ... +r '7 rt r i o •_ x a r x 9 TOWER pRbv'.o-. ¢ w aiM/. rr iii • \•N s �4 fi - _... _ _;� 4 x11 — L 3 D . - y m 41... It ± I! —. m SHELTON ' J 1 ♦�. /� _. .._..r. s • -.. Z.._ z a , i- _� . _ - _ ...777 _ 10/31/2017 St. Croix Village - Fence Replacement St. Croix Village - Fence Replacement Juanita Pekay [juanitapekay@jankenhs.com] Sent:Tuesday, October 31, 2017 3:53 PM To: Erik Olson -Williams Cc: Chris Cooper [ccooper©mbgprop.com] Erik, Thank you for the phone call today! The owner of St. Croix Village Townhomes is requesting that the property be allowed to replace the existing 6 foot cedar fence with either a 5 foot or a 6 foot chain link fence. The primary reasons to use a chain link fence instead of wood are the difference in up -front financial outlay and the reduced ongoing maintenance costs because the chain Zink fence would not need regular staining/sealing and would not rot and deteriorate over time. We have had good success with limiting climbing over chain Zink fences by putting oil on the top of the fence, so that anyone climbing it ruins their clothing. The word gets around, and few people climb the chain link fences at our other properties. Thank you for your consideration, Juanita Pekay Janken Housing Solutions, Inc. 7063 Terraceview Lane Maple Grove, MN 55311 Phone: 763-226-1833 Fax: 763-225-0614 https://mailgateway.ci.stillwater.mn.us/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAADOYOOhsU1 mSJIIlo0U6eTpBwCwHNHrUfBtSa719XhvxjabAAAATgbK... 1 /1 Home 'Improvement .1.,InI NMurNIfog SeMOW. 211 N Rum River Drive Princeton MN 55371 763.389.8999 vwww,homeimpshop.com office@homeimpshop.com Proposal Date 10/3/2017 Proposal # 101701 Name / Address: Project Address: MBG St Croix Village 1615 Orleans St. W. Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Fence Project Description Total Remove Existing Fence and Install New Cedar Material Vinyl Material Metal Material Chain Link Galvanized Price includes, Materials, Tear down and Removal of existing fence and dumpsters, Fence will be 6ft tall, No gates included and Does Not include Permit, 26,880.00 37,440,00 40,320,00 21,998.00 Wt. propose to furnish material and Iahcrf]complete in accordance with the above specifications for the sum of Any alterations or deviation Ii extra charge over and abovy Respectfully Submitted��i r cetli • ions in merit osts vill-:auutedtiniy upon written order, and will become an n stri y�s�ccidents.'or delays beyond our control, ['he above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. All proposal acceptance terms are I /2 clown and remaining balance upon completion. Proposal Acceptance: Date: ' 1I E BIRTPIPIACE 9 F MINNFSOITA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: November 8, 2017 CASE NO.: 2017-58 APPLICANT: Chad Greeder, applicant, representing Fraternal Order of the Eagles a/k/a Eagles 94, property owner REQUEST: Consideration of a Special Use Permit for an assembly hall and outdoor events at 14200 60th Street North ZONING: Business Park - Commercial COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Commercial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND The structure located at 14200 60th Street North was constructed in 1997 by Famous Dave's. It had been occupied by that business until they closed in early 2017. In September of this year, the Fraternal Order of the Eagles (otherwise known as Eagles 94) purchased the property. They anticipate relocating their club from 13523 60th Street North, in Oak Park Heights. At the time of construction, the site and structure were not reviewed by the Planning Commission. This is because restaurants are an outright permitted use in the Business Park - Commercial zoning district. The design of the building was not reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission as the property is not located in a design review district. However, it has been customary for the City to apply the West Stillwater Business Park Plan design standards to the development of any site or structure located in one of the Business Park zoned properties. Conformance with these standards would have been assessed by Planning and Zoning staff at building permit review. REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to add 4,614 square feet to the existing structure for an assembly hall. Assembly halls are a type of "amusement and recreational establishment" 1, which requires a Special Use Permit. This use will be accessory to the primary uses as a restaurant, and the Eagles 94 club. The use of this assembly hall will be for club meetings, as well as for private rentals (weddings, fundraising events, etc.). ' The use table in Section 31-325 of the Zoning Code specifically identifies "assembly halls" as an example of an "amusement and recreational establishment" (see footnote 7 in the use table). 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 2 The applicant will also need a Special Use Permit for Outdoor Events. While not noted in the application, members of the community have indicated the Eagles 94 currently host outdoor events, and staff assumes the Eagles will want to continue these events. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS Municipal Code Section 31-207 indicates the following must be determined by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any Special Use Permit: 1. The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. Zoning Ordinance: The property is zoned Business Park Commercial (BP-C), which allows for restaurants as an outright permitted use; the addition of the assembly hall space is ancillary to the restaurant use. City Code indicates assembly halls, a type of amusement and entertainment establishment, may be allowed by Special Use Permit if there is sufficient sound insulation to effectively confine the noise to the premises. As long as certain development controls are met, the City has found these uses to be consistent with the uses in the BP-C district. The requirement of a Special Use Permit for outdoor events is to ensure the event(s), with certain conditions, are compatible with the adjacent land uses. Parking and Drive Areas A total of 88-95 parking stalls will be required for the existing and proposed uses; the range of spaces is due to how the structure's internal spaces would be calculated. Use Requirement Total Area Total Parking Required Proposed Restaurant 1/120 square feet* *if under 5,000 s.f. gross 1/100 square feet** **if over 5,000 s.f. gross 4,207 square feet 35.058 spaces 42.07 spaces Proposed Office 1/300 216 square feet .072 spaces Assembly Hall 1/3 fixed seats 1/100 square feet* *if over 5,000 s.f. gross 160 fixed seats 4,614 square feet 53.33 spaces 46.14 spaces Total 88 - 95 parking spaces The addition will necessitate the removal of 9 parking spaces and two (approximately) 300 square foot landscape islands. The applicant has indicated they are proposing to retain 109 parking stalls. The plans indicate 123 parking stalls will remain onsite. A total of 24 for those parking stalls are located directly behind the building and adjacent to service and delivery 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 3 doors. There is no drive lane directly adjacent to the service entrance. For effective parking and drive lanes behind the building, a 24" access drive and two 300 square foot landscape islands should be created directly behind the building. This would leave an excess of 12 parking stalls, for a total of 107 parking stalls, on the property. The 107 spaces exceeds their parking requirement. That said, when the applicant chooses to hold outdoor events, they would be located on the parking lot area. This could create a conflict as there is no on - street parking available on the North Frontage Road. During events, the applicant should have a designated overflow parking area in an off-street location. This should be located within 300' of the subject property, as required in the off-street parking and loading standards. As an alternative to a shared parking agreement for off -site parking, Eagles 94 may submit to the City a parking plan with each event permit application that accommodates parking for all outdoor event uses and indoor uses on the date of the event. Stormwater The property will have to meet volume control requirements for all areas that will be disturbed by construction, even if the disturbed areas are currently impervious surface areas. That said, if the disturbed area does not equal 6,000 square feet or greater, Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization review is not required. A grading plan will be required at the time of building permit issuance. The grading plan will demonstrate how the construction activities are meeting the volume control requirements. Lighting The applicant has not submitted a comprehensive lighting package. However, they are proposing the relocation of one existing light pole to a location directly behind the proposed addition. While the fixtures are shielded on three sides, the light on this property has been a source of complaint by the adjacent residential property owners. It is likely due to the height and glass shape. The West Stillwater Business Park Plan indicates the maximum height of parking lot lighting next to residential areas shall be 20 feet. The light pole proposed to be relocated appears to be taller than this. Given this, consideration should be given to eliminate this light and replace it with a less -intrusive parking lot light. A requirement should be that all parking lot lights are reduced in height and shielded on all three sides upon replacement. This should be included with the submission of a complete lighting plan which details 0.0 lumens at the property lines. All wall - mounted lighting shall be shielded as to not see the bulb source. Landscaping Although deciduous and evergreen shrubs and perennial daylilies are proposed to be planted adjacent to the building, the applicant is proposing to 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 4 remove one, 10" popular and two 12" pines (in addition to the 600 gross square feet of landscaping islands). These are determined to be significant trees and must be replanted. A landscaping plan should be required to be submitted with the building permit and installed prior to the release of the grading escrow. As per City Code Section 31-513, Subd 1(e), at least one deciduous tree and at least two shrubs must be installed in a single landscape island. Additionally, landscaping is required around all outside storage areas as per the design requirements of the West Stillwater Business Park plan. Landscaping that will grow up three years to cover 50 percent of the fence face area is required. The building addition will necessitate the relocation of the existing enclosed trash facilities. The property owner is proposing to relocate them into a four- sided enclosure, as well as to construct a new accessory structure designed to house lawn mowing equipment, near the northeast corner of the existing parking lot. Comprehensive Plan: The Local Economy chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan (Page 7-2) indicates the objective to "support business expansion in the....West Stillwater Business Park area". 2. The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. The property is zoned Commercial. As it is adjacent to residentially -zoned lands, there is concern certain activities could be a detriment to the public welfare of the community. That said, lighting has been identified as an issue in this location. With the submission of a comprehensive lighting plan, the lighting concerns from this property will start to be reduced and/or eliminate. The new property owner will be required to abide by City Code Section 38-3, Noise Control and Regulation. This will be for all indoor and outdoor events, including (but not limited to) abiding by the prohibition of noises made by sound producing or reproducing equipment and recreational vehicles after 10:00 pm. However, the City Code indicates the assembly hall may only be permitted when it is sufficiently sound insulated to effectively confine the noise to the premises. Therefore, the applicant will need to submit a noise insulation plan at the time of building permit submittal. 3. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed. Architectural Standards: As noted, the property is not located in the West Stillwater Business Park Plan ("the Plan") area but it is located in a Business Park zoned property and the City has customarily applied the design standards of the Plan to development and redevelopment in these areas. A copy of the Plans design 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 5 guidelines are attached. There following Architectural and Site Plan Standards should be addressed: • Unadorned pre- stressed concrete panels, standard concrete block or metal siding shall not be used as exterior materials for new buildings. Architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels may be acceptable. o The applicant is proposing to remove all wood siding and use a stucco - textured, flat metal panel (sample photograph, not indicating chosen color, above). While the look will not be metal look this material is architecturally enhanced and generally conforms to the intent of the design standards in place. However, the applicant should consider the use of both salvaged wood and the stucco -textured metal panels to create greater visual interest and to be more incompliance with the intent: to create visually interesting structures of durable materials. While the wood siding will require more maintenance in the future, the use of a single, lesser quality siding material may present a cheap look. If a mix of siding materials is not proposed, a minimum requirement should be the panels are (at least) two different colors. ■ Architectural consistency on all sides of the building is required in terms of colors, material and details. o The following items are not consistent with this standard: • The applicant's use of the stucco -textured panels is consistent on all sides but they are not proposing to change existing painted Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) that will be located in the center of the building on the west side. • The current roof is standing seam. The applicants are proposing a corrugated metal roof in a similar color. However, the roof design will not have the same pattern. • The applicant is proposing to remove three existing false windows on the east and west gables. While these were traditional elements of the Famous Dave's design, they help break the design of the structure on these facades. 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 6 ■ The north and east facades of the addition are proposed to have windows. The applicant has indicated the decision to not include them on the west facade is to have a single wall with no openings but also to reduce the glare of setting sun. However, this is the street - facing side and the lack of architectural detail on this facade creates a long, visually unattractive wall. • A landscaped area equal to twice the sign area comprised of bushes or flowers shall be provided around the base of free standing signs. o This requirement was not met at the time of construction. The property owners will be required to create a landscaped area around the base of their proposed pylon sign. • Parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent residential areas by a solid masonry wall or equivalent 10 feet of landscaped gutter on the commercial side of the wall. o Currently there is a 6' tall, wood privacy fence near the northern property boundary. However, it is located on the residential property owner's land; staff cannot determine when the fence was constructed but assumes it was with the construction of the residential development given it borders the entire northern property boundary. Property owners have questioned who owns the fence as maintenance has been lacking. That said, a requirement of the original development of Famous Dave's was to install some sort of buffer between the adjacent residential areas and the commercial property. Although there is 100' of distance between the property line and the parking lot, this area is not landscaped enough to create the buffer required. As there is a 20' drainage and utility easement in this area, and the City's Public Works Department needs to access this easement area by vehicle, the installation of a comprehensive landscaped buffer is not desirable. There is a 15' drainage and utility easement on the residential property owners which, according to the Public Works Department, helps create a channel that runs along the property line. Therefore, the commercial property owner should either be required to: ■ Enter into an agreement with the property owners at Lot 10, 23 and 24, Block 1, Forest Ridge 2nd Addition, and have it recorded against the property, for the joint maintenance of the existing fence; or • Develop a comprehensive buffer landscape plan to include a diversity of shade and evergreen species to be located outside of the established drainage and utility easement areas. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to the release of a grading escrow. Architectural design is something Stillwater takes great pride in despite the challenges faced with the Business Park zoned lands. To that effect, the Planning Commission should uphold the design standards requiring four-sided architecture, material diversity, as well as required landscaping and screening not installed at the time of construction of the building. 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 7 Outside Events: As noted, Eagles 94 hosts a few outdoor events each year. Concern has been raised about outside events adjacent to residential properties. Therefore, staff would recommend the following be applicable for (up to) four outdoor events per year: • Sixty (60) days prior to the event the property owner will notify all adjacent property owners of the event date, hours, activities, and point of contact and contact information during the event. • Thirty (30) days prior to the event the property owner will submit a complete event permit application to the City for review. • Pending no previously substantiated complaints, the event permit (not including any liquor licensing changes) may be administratively approved. Where substantiated complaints exist, the event permit shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Signage: The property is permitted signage as per the Sign Code. This includes one freestanding sign and one wall sign per building face. The applicant is proposing three signs: 1. A 79 square foot, south facing wall sign proposed to read 'Eagles 94'. This blue, channel letter design would be relocated from the existing location. 2. A 72 square foot, internally lit pylon sign to read 'Eagles 94' and have a manually - interchangeable reader board sign below. This sign, too, would be relocated from the existing location. ouBuz �i�C011E EAT RAFFLE FR1 94R 91NG0 ESl NUT P These signs are in general conformance with the Sign Code. Sign permits would be required prior to the installation. Any additional signage, including window signage, temporary signage and signs located behind a window, shall be required to conform to City Code Section 31-509. Other Concerns: When Famous Dave's was constructed, it did not install a grease trap; currently grease is entering into the sanitary sewer system. The Public Works Department has continually experienced issues related to this. As a result, a grease trap that meets the requirements of the plumbing code should be required to be installed. 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 8 ALTERNATIVES A. Approval If the Planning Commission finds the proposal to be consistent with the provisions of the SUP regulations, the Commission could approve the Special Use Permit with or without the conditions included below. B. Table If the Planning Commission finds that the application is not complete enough to make a decision, it could continue the review for additional information. C. Denial If the Planning Commission finds the proposal is not consistent with the provisions of the SUP regulations, the Commission could deny the application. The Commission should indicate a reason for the denial and state whether or not the denial is with prejudice. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that, with certain conditions, the club uses and 4,614sqaure foot expansion of the structure to include an assembly hall space could conform to the requirements and the intent of the Zoning Code, the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations and not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. Based on the aforementioned findings, staff recommends approval of the CPC Case No. 2017-58 at 14200 60th Street North, with the following conditions: 1. The project must be built in substantial consistency with the plans on file with the Community Development Department as part of CPC Case No. 2017-58 and otherwise modified by condition, below. 2. A modified site plan, to include a 24" drive land and two, 300 square foot parking lot islands behind the building, shall be submitted for review and approval with the building permit. 3. Up to four outdoor events per year will be allowed on the property. An event permit from the City will be required for each event. The following will apply to the event permits: a. Sixty (60) days prior to the event the property owner will notify all adjacent property owners of the event date, hours, activities, and point of contact and contact information during the event. b. Thirty (30) days prior to the event the property owner will submit a complete event permit application to the City for review. c. Pending no previously substantiated complaints, the event permit (not including any liquor licensing changes) may be administratively approved. Where substantiated complaints exist, the event permit shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council. d. A shared parking agreement or lease for overflow event parking shall be developed with an adjacent property owner within 300'. The agreement or lease shall be executed by both parties and submitted to the City of Stillwater to be retained in the property files. As an alternative to a shared parking 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 9 agreement for off -site parking, Eagles 94 may submit to the City a parking plan with each event permit application that accommodates parking for all outdoor event uses and indoor uses on the date of the event. 4. Low profile self-contained mechanical units which blend in with the building design are permitted to be located to the east side of the building. 5. A comprehensive lighting plan, to include specifications and cut sheets for all proposed exterior lights, shall be submitted, review and approved with the building permit. This will include, but not be limited to, a new 20' parking lot pole (containing a completely shielded fixture) to be located in the proposed location near the Northeast corner of the new addition. The lighting plan will depict 0.0 lumens at the property line. 6. A landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and approval with the building permit. The landscaping shall be installed prior to the release of the grading permit escrow. The landscaping plan shall include, at a minimum: a. As per City Code Section 31-513, Subd. 1(e), two, 300 square foot parking lot islands that contain at least one deciduous tree and at least two shrubs and shall be mulched with a minimum of four inches of rock, wood chips or similar material. All planting islands shall be treated with a mechanical weed inhibiter. One tube for feeding and watering shall be installed in each planting island. b. Landscaping that will grow up three years to cover 50 percent of the outside storage areas, including the accessory structure and trash enclosure. c. A 200 square foot landscaped area at the base of the freestanding, pylon sign. 7. To address the northern property buffer, prior to the release of the building permit, the applicant shall either: a. Enter into an agreement with the property owners at Lot 10, 23 and 24, Block 1, Forest Ridge 2nd Addition, and have it recorded against the property, for the joint maintenance of the existing fence; or b. Develop a comprehensive buffer landscape plan to include a diversity of shade and evergreen species to be located outside of the established drainage and utility easement areas. The landscape plan shall be installed prior to the release of a grading escrow. 8. The structure will have architectural detail, design and materials on all four sides. This shall include, but not be limited to, the retention of false windows on the existing gables, the addition of false windows on the new addition's western facade, the use of standing seem metal roofing, and the elimination of existing painted CMU on the east facade. The applicant shall consider the use of both salvaged wood and the stucco -textured metal panels on all facades to create greater visual interest. If a mix of siding materials is not proposed, at least two colors shall be utilized to help create a break in each wall face. 9. The project shall meet the volume control requirements of and, if required, meet conditions of approval of the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. 10. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. A noise insulation plan will need to be submitted for review and approval with the building permit. 14200 60th Street North Case No. 2017-58 (CPC 11/8/2017) Page 10 12. A grease trap will be required to be installed prior to release of a Certificate of Occupancy. 13. Building permit plans must be approved by the fire marshal and building official prior to the issuance of a building permit for any interior alterations. 14. All signs shall conform to City Code Section 31-509, Sign Regulations, and shall obtain a sign permit prior to installation. 15. Major exterior modifications to the variance permit request shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as per Section 31-204, Subd. 7. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative Request Certificate of Survey Site Details, Condition and Demolition plan Site and Utility Plan Grading and Erosion Control Plan Landscape Plan Floor Plans/Elevations Custom Panel Solutions Spec Sheet Ceram -A -Star (proposed roofing) Spec Sheet Public Comments Rk w,; = I '., 11i11\vater o {/j f WEST ORLEANS STREET "`'}� `;IL— I r R°z DRIVE1 _ WEST ORLEANS ST RLLT $ * Zif µI s .,r� 30 y The Birthplace of Minnesota ��,.. ,.1. ��•�•��••��•�••�••�•_.. �I "III yl . z _ _ _ . VP -, 4 a w _ SHEL DRIVE Pe • 9 =O - -1 _•.—••60TH STREET•..•N=.TH _ _ •_••_••_••• " c00Rr =m - e( -4. F VICTORIA Q y,S i E 8 s � i ; �f <° r¢ 4 r�R,Fg�.._.._.,..�,.�.._•v�•H• SHELTON DRIVE 1 COURT 0 OREN AVE CRTN Yi N ROTH _ STREET NORTH ! 2 6OTH STREET NORTH w STATE HIGHWAY 36 STATE HIGHWAY 36 • -- - - o ��E W4 Site Location Map 14200 60th Street North •._•._.•_••_.•_ _••_. ..•• _ _••J ROTHSTREET NORTH 0 430 860 1.720 Feet _ 4; j, ='t 1 _ -"sit _--I II I - General Site Location = ..,_ MkIg�..N �I1.�9 �y? �, 1 �6 1 M. ill _IV • ♦t . lit it FA Ti w1i� A Letter of Use is required for all Building Permit Applications (construction, demolition and/or change of use), or for a change in tenancy, in new and existing industrial, commercial, public and institutional buildings/units and for Zoning Certificate of Occupancy Applications. This submission is to augment, not supersede, any other documentation required to support your Building Permit/Zoning Certificate of Occupancy Application. Should you have any questions or concerns related to completing this form please Contact us: PART A Call 311 or 905-615-4311 when beyond Mississauga borders, and leave a service request with the attendant. A representative will return your call within 72 hours, or email pplanbuild.info@misslssauga.ca PART B Call 905-896-5634 or email flrenlanrevIew@misslssauga.ca Part A A. Prolect Address Building number, street name: Unit number: Unit size: (Sqm) B. Tenant Contact Information_ (Last Name) �j/I?,�� � (First Name) C'i%fi� `� �, 1 (Email) / ,/LL/4rE/� / 9/��, % ® i (Office no.) (Cell no.) g..7 /-2/6 -0 < 27 (Fax no.) C. Business Information r Type of Business Proposed: (Retail Store / Restaurant / Manufacturing / Warehousing etc.) 1/1a (Mail dF y/S.I Soer;4/ Aa0/4 04 4-1,441 ! e�..,u/ e Name of Business: (at this location) / 4/, 62)e2 of �A9 .s ,C'4g/Cs 99 Name of Corporation: FAA1 o20(A. or 45 Detailed description of all operations/processes to b conducted at the unit/building you intend to occupy: (Please provide a detailed description of the proposed business operation, what type of business do you conduct, what product(s) or service(s) do you /provi/d�e, who do you provide it to?)? GI/ k ow /o v de 'o c �r2 �,41 €'M &.41 ,' ,d /4c ,V 4 /r E) A BA& CL/,'/ ! /`�GCJ /}!/4,JA Pe' /��r/ 7�%t C / `-iL » T /0 1 /1., 7vdz L f i4 J G 4m 41,7 A ,.r/ 4,,,0 4 s /4 SG / C 3 (.v E GbN�k /c? /4 £ CQ/yln'lvv,'//c_ 00/l M01447 , S Park &0/ Acv/£ /- 7:4 L f. »4// C�&v/ k,+ i /l L / ai tcC-f l'o' �� /, ,pit /4 /4.4. _s o 4:C Gt1Es`c4. ^-'y5 tw, b-V /h� < i/# f ; Detailed description of the proposed scope of work to be carried out�nder this applicatio/n: r Are You Proposing Retail Sales Directly to the Public? r'Yes (Describe items to be sold at retail and clearly delineate and dimensions the retail area on your floor plans): ❑ No food )A; / Are You Proposing Outdoor Display? 'Yes (If yes, indicate the type of materials to be displayed and clearly delineate and dimension/`the area on your site plans): III No 9 k /o U,o4 A / S/'clni t Ae4d �o 1- s• 6f)0/ /°%% Are You Proposing Outdoor Storage? Yes (Indicate the types of items and clearly delineate and dimension the area on yourLsite plan): Ill No Oc11( 10004- shtc/ /SA AhN/ V '�l/r/OrMzit/ 1 1- G,4/LJY19L /3 '$ Total Number of Employees? /-�, /d / Male: ,I Female: Number of Patrons: f 60 ,Cil,EA,/ CC'rv"f1.11 100 /.s'A&// ) Iiv t1AJl (i.e., proposed seating in a Restaurant/Place of Religious Assembly/other "assembly" type of occupancy) CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SQUThNEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTI-HEST QUARTER, SECTION 33, TONNSI-I I P 30 NORTI-I, RANGE 20 NEST, CITY OF STI LNATER, INIASI-1 I NGTQN COUNTY, M I NNESOTA SURVEY PREPARED FOR: MATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES NO 94 13523 60th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Found 1/2 inch inside diameter iron pipe marked with a plastic cap inscribed RLS 13775 set by me Joel T. Anez in a previous survey dated 10-03-96. Found 5/8 inch \ 6.76 iron rod tipped to the south. N8,9°1O`17"w 6.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement VICINITY MAP 6 foot L c • co 1tt CC SHELDON STATE TRUNK 4.1 SITE 60TH STREET N0R]H DRIVE VICTORIA COURT 6-2 HIGHWAY 36 60TH STREET Ct Q `c NORTH NO SCALE Found 3/4 inch rt-, diameter iron pin �-J marked with an aluminum cap inscribed B11810. 1-0 0 Found cast iron monument. i SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET Washington County cast iron monument at the SW corner of Section 33, T3ON, R2OW. LU" U c 03 0 N00°24'41 %AI I / P 919.5 x x 915.8 920.5 x / x ((i18.4 6.00 foot wide x 916.1 drainage and utility easement 21.3 x 916.5 inch inside diameter concrete \\ (lr .!rl r__Li ► lJ1 1L_._: 1 15.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement high wood fence is north of property line x918.7 8" pine n� t_L./1 I I �'► /, I(' L.)1_ _ ►�.� v 1 \ /l i_v Q 1 1Th 7Th 1- 1 \ 1`7 L_ Found iron rod marked • with a plastic cap inscribed KEMPER 15407. 7 '� ill\ 1n Neicr0' 17"W 250.06 -178.32 - 6 foot high wood fence is north of property line x 9178 x x 920.8 921.9 / • pine 12" pine 12" \ pine 8" spruce 921.5 922.0 923.0 culvert with flared end. Invert elevation is 916.9 feet. 8" spruce catch basins 811 spruce Yt 1 /-1 L./ r r t�r A T`1fl\1TltTh11 1 r� Li' Li1 1 1'%.J1 v -71.74- 6 foot hi•h wood fence is north of north line, S1/2 SW1/4 - SW1/4 x 917.2 916.7 20.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement x 919.1 x 915.8 "*,915.0 x 916:4 _ x 918.6 8" spruce 979.2 915.9 SITE ADDRESS 14200 60th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 •ro.ertline south line of the North 661.4 feet of the SW1/4 - SW1/4 918.8x 916.6 x 60 inch diameter weir. x�915.9 Elevation of to of concrete 1 divider is 918.6 feet. Top of 4 inch pvc drain pipe is 6.00 foot wide 9171 feet. drainage and utility/ easemen {' �� -x915.3 x915.3 916.5 x -_ x 915.8 x-9T67 `91 FJ 250.00 915.2 x 916.0 a 12" - popple 920.1 _ 921.2 921.6 � - r-- 992.7 x 922.7 x 7 925.1 926.0 x ciro '3�' o4fj tl / /0 14. popple R- S80_ 9270 Found 3/4 inch diameter iron pin marked with an aluminum cap inscribed B11812- 8.97 NOO°35 55'E bee hive 925.9� catch basin / 926.7 x 26.8 9273 x 927.5 x 074 927.1 plantings 923.5 x • x plantings 9 PARCE24 9231 ti 1 9©a 8" x spruce 924.4 790-acres± Y1 Jn-elJ ng Right of Way 2.343 acres± excluding Right of Way 925.6 rock surface 9277 Proposed Addition � 1l Popple 0 } IM rock surface 927.7 y f _ 926.7 Elevation of y concrete surface at corner is 928.0 feet Existing Building Elevation of concrete surface at entrance is 928.1 feet surface. - Flag pole 4 flood light plantings r- ♦�f 927.3 x 927 8 rock surface plantings xx 80.00 r-926:4- ` \ 0 12" pines EM rock surface 10.00 foot wide concreted footings drainage and utility easement 194.55 - -- 1V8912 (15"W_ 925,9x inorth line of Highway Right of Way Plat 0925.4 - = mail box a bee hive 279 k 926.5 catch basin x 9271 x 9273 x 9274 x9272 x 927.0 927.4 1 x 925.9 9178 x . 916.8 8" spruce 916.2 LLJ r\ x 919.0 8„ 8'"7A- •- birch 'spruce 926.9k 927.1 12 pine a 926.6 -._.._ water curb stop catch basin 6OTH STREET NORTH 926.1 • 6" (7f) spruce L 8" [.1' spruce Y C� l / 1 1 Q x %,„Si 919.8 ra 12" pine 12" pine 12" pine " 12" } pine 1 I\ v -f centerline of west bound Jane L catch basin MINNESOTA TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 (formerly known as MTNNE S O TA TRUNK HIGHWAY 212) MJNNESQTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WA Y PLAT NO. 82-118 centerline of east bound lane 12" pine 12" pine hydrant 925.9 NOO°24'41 "1A1 x Found 1/2 inch inside diameter iron pipe marked with a plastic cap inscribed RLS 13775 set by me Joel T. Anez in a previous survey dated 10-03-96. and ZEMAN CONSTRUCTiON COMPANY 8900 loth Avenue North Golden Valley, MN 55427 r DETAIL wood fence • 0.3 wood fence NOT TO SCALE FENCE NOTE I, Joel T. Anez, did a boundary survey of this property 920.0 dated October 3, 1996 and at that time there was a 6 foot high wood privacy fence near the north line. 922.8 Found 1/2 inch inside diameter iron pipe marked with a plastic cap inscribed RLS 13776 set by me Joel T. Anez in a previous survey dated 10-03-96. 924.0 1072.43 N89°01'29"W 60TH S TREE T NORTH south line, SW1/4 - SW1/4 N& °o1'29"k 250.07 LEGEND Orientation of the bearing system is the Washington County Coordinate Distances are in feet and decimals of a foot Contours were obtained from the Minnesota EINR lidar project and are at 2 foot intervals, and are based on American Vertical Datum 1988 adjustment 1988 Adjustment. Elevations shown are based on North American Vertkal Datum 1988 adjustment. 0 Denotes a 1/2 inch inside diameter iron pipe monument set, marked by a plastic cap inscribed with ANEZ LS 13775. 0 Denotes a found monument, described as shown. Denotes bituminous surface. Denotes concrete surface. Denotes water surface. R-• Denotes radius of curve. L-= Denotes length of curve. D=- Denotes delta angle of curve. CB= Denotes chord bearing of curve. CD= Denotes chord distance.. GM Denotes gas meter. al Denotes electric meter. ET Denotes electric transformer. FS Denotes t7re sprinkler. Denotes light pole. x 9272 Denotes measured ground elevation. Denotes buried electric line. Denotes buried gas line. - Denotes buried communication line. ▪ Denotes communication pedestal. Denotes 8 inch square post. CI Denotes sign. BENCHMARK Benchmark is surface of concrete at threshold to entry door as shown hereon. The elevation is 928.1 feet based on the North American Datum 1988 adjustment. NOTES Area of property encumbered by the recorded Highway Right of Way Plat but no formal taking of this parcel was found. Under ground sprinker heads were observed in some of the parking lot islands and in some of the mowed areas but they were not located. The concrete curb is 86-12. No communication markings were found leading to the building. LIMITED WARRANTY DEED, Document No. 4126542 Exhibit A The East 250.00 feet of the South 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30, Range 20 West of the City of Stillwater. QUIT CLAIM DEED, Document No. 918227 A perpetual easement for utility and drainage purposes upon certain portions of the South one-half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30, Range 20, described as (i) The East six feet thereof (ii) The West 12 feet of the East 256 feet thereof (in) The South ten feet of that part thereof which lies North of the Northerly right of way line of Minnesota Trunk Highway Number 36 DEED OF APPURTENANT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT, Easement No. 89-3 Parcel No. 96-95033-2150 Exhibit A A 20.00 FOOT PERPETUAL EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "EASEMENT A", OVER, UNDER, AND ACROSS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "PARCEL 3" THAT PART OF THE EAST 427 FEET OF TFIE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 30 NORTH, RANGE 20 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY MINNESOTA, LYING NORTH OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 212 (STATE HIGHWAY NO. 36), EXCEPT THE NORTH 661.4 FEET OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER. SAID "EASEMENT A" BEING THE NORTHERLY 20.00 FEET OF SAID "PARCEL 3". Note: The temporary easement portion of the above deed has expired. 1322.50 Washington County cast S1/4 corner of Section 33, T3ON, R2OW. SURVEY PREPARED 13Y: Landmark Surveying, Inc. Cell number: 651-235-8880 ODELL A VENUE NOR TH Official copies of this map are crimp sealed. hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that i am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Landmark Surveying Inc. October 12 2017 Joel T. nez Minnesota License No. 75 Date Job Number 2017-54 LEGEND DEMOLITION NOTES trl 0 ci) Pci auoi punoq )saM }o aui/aa1ua3 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN 1"=20' trri Lu D 0I N 0) Po cn 3 C1 UE 9) �. 0 (cli 0) 0) 0) ti 0 co 2 R 0) 0) Xw 0) rock su UE n 0) N 0 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT / 146.13 1,6 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE BUILDING POSTS AND CANOPY SEE ARCH PLAN \/ ;uawnuow x 0, uoai lseo punod PROTECT EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN REMOVE ROCK MULCH 10" popple, Existing Buildin" RELOCATE GAS METER SEE SHEET C-101 FOR FINAL LOCATION PROTECT EXISTING ELECTRIC BOXES AND METER PROTECT EXISTING WATER SERVICES X 0) N 0) 6 WTR� 9 X CO 5( ti PROTECT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PAD, UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC & GAS 33. 59 0'ti ro 00°0z- c m REMOVE TREE REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UNDERGROUND UTILITY REMOVE TREE N00 29'50W 79.52 spruce trees REMOVE CURB & GUTTER SAW CUT & REMOVE 1— BITUMINOUS REMOVE WING WALLS & TRASH SALVAGE AND REUSE GATES REMOVE CURB & GUTTER SALVAGE ROCK MULCH REMOVE TREES SALVAGE SIGN 12" pines PROTECT EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SAW CUT & REMOVE BITUMINOUS 129. 71 Cr) n - ro 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY DATED OCTOBER 12, 2017 BY LANDMARK SURVEYING, INC., SCANDIA, MINNESOTA, EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT. ELAN DESIGN LAB CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY ARE DISCOVERED SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERING UN -WITNESSED WORK SHALL RESULT IN REJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 3. PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPE NOT LABELED FOR DEMOLITION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY ON -SITE OR OFF -SITE AREAS DISTURBED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DUE TO CONN.TR.IICTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CIVIL PENALTIES RESULTING FROM THEIR WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. R. w 3 O: -n c m v � 3 3 S & 5. CD CD a CD c O- 0 w W � 3 _. 0 5. CD 0 CO - 7 -0 S 5. spruce trees 46 75 J. ��90 act -es .Boding Right Cf \2. 34,E Goes cl_iging Right of REMOVE PLANTING REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE PLANTING PVC €r 6.2t RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHT POLE SEE SHEET C-101 FOR FINAL LOCATION EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE - SUITABILITY FOR REUSE TO BE DETERMINED BY PLUMBING CONTRACTOR a Th ro 0) W 000 72 crt a 0 CD a Th (v /cm R 0) 0 >— REMOVE CURB & GUTTER SAW CUT & REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. DO NOT DISTURB SUBGRADE R R� 1 r N 61 CD, 0 01 01 0 CD 0- CO 0 N N 6" PVC LT 31 / / / 0) 4. NO DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ON -SITE. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE HAULED OFF -SITE TO A DISPOSAL AREA APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS. WORK SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A CONDITION THAT MINIMIZES EROSION POTENTIAL ON A NIGHTLY BASE. 5. LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES. 6. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND FILTER LOG SHALL BE IN PLACE AS SOON AS DEMOLITION OPERATIONS ALLOW. SEE SHEET C-201 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND APPROPRIATE STAGING. 7. PROVIDE NECESSARY BARRICADES, SUFFICIENT LIGHTS, SIGNS AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN AND TRAFFIC CONTROL METHODS AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. 8. REMOVE ALL EXISTING SURFACE SITE FEATURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS PAVING, CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS CURBING, WALKWAYS, CONCRETE APRON, SIGNAGE AND RELATED FOUNDATIONS, WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. spruce trees / / / 0) (-n Existing Building 01 0 0 a cn I0l �2., ACC I 10 lo o ft CD CD Po CD csD ou cp v I,_, O I— 0 I8 I( �'. CD o I _ a v Ia CD 0 ro ▪ V 00 Po co on 0 0 L/1 St cb Know what's below. Call before you dig. LES CTI :0i1 -CD _oaci _0)57 O_CD(DI 51' '7 I . cn" - 4— ‘C / )j owl . (1: . in co o co cc • 0 41-3 co apisu 0 pa)pew po.i uoai punod 20 60 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES NO 94 STILLWATER, MN 55082 T 651-XXXX ZEMAN CONSTRUCTION SCOTT PETERS 8900 10TH AVENUE N GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 T 763-398-8930 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT STILLWATER, MN ISSUE SITE PLAN REVIEW 10/20/2017 REVISION DATE SHEET INDEX C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 SITE & UTILITY PLAN C-201 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-501 DETAILS L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a dul Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of thi..s NNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 10/20/17 SHEET COlOARO09.DWG EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN C-010 PROJECT NO. SCALE IN FEET LEGEND PROJECT SUMMARY SITE PLAN NOTES uisoq L/ L DD SITE & UTILITY PLAN 1"=20' PzJ • c) MEET & MATCH EXISTING WALK 13.83' 4 CONCRETE PAVEMENT PERVIOUS AREA MEET & MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER SITE AREA EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING ADDITION WALK/ DRIVE/ PARKING TOTAL IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS 102,060 SF. (2.34 AC.) EXISTING PROPOSED 6,034 SF. 52,860 SF. 58,894 SF. 43,166 SF. 6,034 SF. 4,614 SF. 47,652 SF. 58,300 SF. (DECREASE 594 SF.) 43,760 SF. TOTAL NEW & RECONSTRUCTED IMPERVIOUS 5,464 SF. RESURFACED PAVEMENT (TRASH AREA) 942 SF. TOTAL PARKING TO REMAIN ACCESSIBILITY STALL STANDARD STALL 0 uj I 0 �0 CD CD DCS LJ 0 o - 1 0 0 00 0 UE ;o uoi1eneIE 1 STAIR RISER EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING ELECTRICAL PAD �a uoiaenal3 BUILDING ADDITION 4,614 +/- SF. FFE 928.1 50.17' co .1' o 6' WTR RELOCATED GAS METERS MEET & MATCH EXISTING WALK MEET & MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER 1 STAIR RISER B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) SAW CUT BITUMINOU AT MATCHLINE 4 \ SIDWALKJOINT C-501 (TYP) 248'-6 PVC Ci 6.2% RELOCATED LIGHT POLE U OF —an— — > 109 STALLS 6 STALLS 103 STALLS 0- 0 0 ,( 21.88' I3.5i� 18' 24' DRIVE AISLE SHED CONCRETE PAVEMENT REINSTALL SALVAGED GATES PIPE BOLLARD / 5 (TYP) C-501 R3.67' w N co TRASH ENCLOSURE Y 15.33' y' \—MEET & MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER 1. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO BACK OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. PROVIDE TRANSITION AS NECESSARY. 3. ON -SITE CURB TO BE B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER. 4. ALL CURBS TO HAVE 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100'-0" AND CONTROL JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 10'-0". 5. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING. ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS TO BE PAINTED IN WHITE AND ACCESSIBILITY ACCESS AISLES TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE TO STALL, WITH 'NO PARKING' MARKED REFLECTORIZED PAINT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3592. Know what's below. Call before you dig. 20 60 SCALE IN FEET FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES NO 94 13523 60TH STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082 T 651-XXXX ZEMAN CONSTRUCTION SCOTT PETERS 8900 10TH AVENUE N GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 T 763-398-8930 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L. L.c. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT EAGLES 94 STILLWATER, MN ISSUE SITE PLAN REVIEW 10/20/2017 REVISION DATE SHEET INDEX C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 SITE & UTILITY PLAN C-201 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-501 DETAILS L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Civil Engineering 1 Landscape Architecture 1 Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a dul Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of th IINNESOTA. NOO �pN GONS Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 10/20/17 SHEET C101ARC09.DWG SITE & UTILITY PLAN 0-101 PROJECT NO. ARC17009 GRADING NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS NOTED. 3. ALL UNDOCUMENTED FILL, AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING PAD. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE PROJECT EXCAVATIONS TO VERIFY THAT UNSUITABLE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY REMOVED FROM PROPOSED STRUCTURAL AREAS, THAT ADEQUATE BEARING SUPPORT IS PROVIDED BY THE EXPOSED SOILS AND THAT STRUCTURAL FILL IS PLACED APPROPRIATELY. THE EXPOSED SOIL AT THE BASE OF FOOTINGS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98 PERCENT PROCTOR DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698). 4. ON -SITE NON -ORGANIC SOIL IS GENERALLY SUITABLE FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. SILTY OR ORGANIC SOILS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY THAT PROPER COMPACTION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED (DRIED OR WETTED) AS APPROPRIATE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. MOISTURE CONDITIONED ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 8 INCHES OR LESS. EACH LIFT OF FILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED BY LARGE VIBRATORY EQUIPMENT UNTIL THE IN -PLACE SOIL DENSITY IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING TABULATION. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPACTION CRITERIA MOISTURE CONTENT VARIANCE FROM OPTIMUM (%RESPECTIVE PROCTOR) NON -ENGINEERED FILL (GREEN SPACE) 95 -5 TO +5%, ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOUNDATIONS 98 ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FLOOR SLABS 98 -3 TO +3% FOR SOILS WITH <12% P200, -1 TO +3% FOR ALL OTHER SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SOILS WITH <12% P200, -1 TO +3% FOR ALL OTHER SOILS 5. SIDEWALLS SHALL BE BENCHED OR SLOPED TO PROVIDE SAFE WORKING CONDITIONS AND STABILITY FOR ENGINEERED FILL PLACEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE STABILITY OF AND EXECUTING PROJECT EXCAVATIONS USING SAFE METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR NAMING THE "COMPETENT INDIVIDUAL" AS PER SUBPART P OF 29 CFR 1926.6 (FEDERAL REGISTER - OSHA). IF SOIL CORRECTION IS REQUIRED IT SHALL EXTEND 3 FEET OUTSIDE OF THE PAVEMENT OR BUILDING LIMITS PLUS ONE FOOT HORIZONTAL FOR EVERY VERTICAL FOOT OF CORRECTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE SUBGRADE FROM INCLEMENT WEATHER TO MAINTAIN STABILITY. FOLLOWING REMOVAL OF TOPSOIL, PAVEMENT, AND ANY UNSUITABLE SOILS, THE RESULTING SUBGRADE SHOULD BE SCARIFIED AND RE -COMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES. A PROOFROLL TEST SHOULD THEN BE PERFORMED TO DETERMINE SOFT OR UNSTABLE SUBGRADE AREAS. IF RUTTING OR LOCALIZED UNSTABLE SUBGRADE AREAS ARE OBSERVED, THOSE AREAS SHOULD BE SUBCUT, MOISTURE -CONDITIONED, AND RE -COMPACTED OR REMOVED TO A STABLE DEPTH. THE PROOF ROLL SHOULD BE PERFORMED WITH A TANDEM AXLE DUMP TRUCK LOADED TO GROSS CAPACITY (AT LEAST 20 TONS). ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF THE PROOF ROLL SHALL BE LIMITED TO RUT FORMATION NO MORE THAN ONE INCH (1") DEPTH (FRONT OR REAR AXLES) AND NO PUMPING (ROLLING) OBSERVED DURING THE VISUAL INSPECTION. PROOF ROLL cc ■ CC) 0 TESTS SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TO VERIFY THE SUBGRADE WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PAVEMENT SUPPORT. 7. PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCH 3"" BITUMINOUS WEAR (MNDOT 2360) WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEA240E) MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF AGGREGATE BASE CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6.0" CONCRETE BALANCE OF EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5 OR CL7) DO NOT DISTURB SUBGRADE #4 BAR 24" O.C. BOTH DIRECTIONS (MNDOT 3301) CONCRETE WALKWAYS 4.0" CONCRETE WALK (SEE BELOW) 4" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5 OR CL7) COMPACTED SUBGRADE 8. CONCRETE MIX NO. 3F5# (MNDOT 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR HAND PLACED FORMED CURB AND GUTTER, MEDIANS, DRIVEWAYS, CROSS GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND MEDIANS. CONCRETE MIX NO. 3M3#, MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR AN EXTRUSION MACHINE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. IN THE PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE, AN AIR ENTRAINING AGENT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MIX ACCORDING TO MNDOT 2461.4. 9. FORM COATING MATERIAL SHALL MEET MNDOT 3902. 10. CONCRETE INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH MNDOT 2531. 11. SITE CONCRETE FINISHING - CONCRETE SHALL BE STRUCK TRUE TO CROSS SECTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. NO ADDITIONAL WATER MAY BE ADDED TO AID IN THE FINISHING PROCESS. A LIGHT BROOM FINISH WILL BE REQUIRED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE ON ALL CONCRETE WORK UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND JOINTS IN CURB,GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND STEPS SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH A SUITABLE EDGING TOOL. BEFORE FINAL FINISHING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE CONCRETE WITH A TEN (10) FOOT STEEL STRAIGHT EDGE TO ENSURE THERE IS NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 3/16"FROM THE STRAIGHT EDGE ON TANGENT LINES OR GRADES. IF DEVIATIONS GREATER THAN 3/16" ARE FOUND THE WORK WILL BE CONSIDERED AS UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 12. CONCRETE CURING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY APPLYING A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND (TYPE 2, WHITE PIGMENTED, MNDOT 3754) TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE CONCRETE WITHIN ONE (1)HOUR AFTER FINISHING THE CONCRETE SURFACES. WHEN THE FORMS ARE REMOVED IN LESS THAN 72 HOURS AFTER PLACING THE CONCRETE, THE CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EXPOSED SURFACES, OR THE TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY WITH SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL. THE RATE OF APPLICATION OF CURING COMPOUND SHALL 7.81 STAIR 1 RISER TOS 8.04 7.55 7.77 U 0 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1"=20' circ ❑0 ATCH BOS 7.54 Ell MI 6.26 MEET & MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER V 0 MEET & MATCH EXISTING WALK 8.10 CONCRETE WALKWAY x: CO ti X LO LEA FFE 928.1 CONCRETE WALKWAY 5.18• 5.18 x 7.60 5.82 X I 5.97 5.8 .7.98 8.10 .' 1-MEET & MATCH EXISTING 8.10 7.97 8.10 I CURB & GUTTER 0 MEET & MATCH EXISTING WALK 7.62 8.07 6.98 x 7.6 CONCRETE WALKWAY I x 1 5.62 7.98 TC7.50 IMO STAIR 1 RISER TOS 8.05 BOS 7.55 6.11 15.72 6.11 FILTER LOG (TYP) x c 0 ci INLET PROTECTION (TYP) CONCRETE PAVEMENT. DO NOT DISTURB SUBGRADE 922.74 2.3% 922.27 0 922.95 MEET & MATCH EXISTING ° 01A% 1 CURB & GUTTER <.05o 922.97 0 0 92.05 `1 1 _,92/05 0 v CD FILTER (TYP) 11 BE 150 SQUARE FEET PER GALLON. THE COMPOUND SHALL APPEAR AS WHITE AS A SHEET OF PAPER AFTER APPLICATION ON THE CONCRETE SURFACE. 13. PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL MEET MNDOT 3702, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER RADII. WHERE NEW CONCRETE SURROUNDS, ADJOINS, OR ABUTS ANY EXISTING FIXED OBJECTS SUCH AS FIRE HYDRANTS, BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER RIGID STRUCTURES. AFTER EACH LOAD OF CONCRETE WHEN PLACING CURB AND EVERY 100 FEET WHEN PLACING SIDEWALK. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL NOT BE SEALED BUT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A SPACING OF 10 FEET ON CURB AND GUTTER AND ON SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL BE CUT TO A DEPTH 1/3 THE THICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE, SURFACE AND BACK OF ALL CURBS. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT NO SLAB IS LARGER THAN 100 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING CONTRACTION JOINTS THAT PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CRACKING AT OTHER LOCATIONS. 14. CONCRETE TESTING INCLUDING SLUMP, AIR ENTRAINMENT, TEMPERATURE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FIRST LOAD OF THE DAY FOR ALL CONCRETE POURS OF AT LEAST 4 CUBIC YARDS. AN ADDITIONAL TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR EACH 100 CUBIC YARDS OR PORTION THEREOF. 15. AGGREGATE BASE FINAL SHAPING AND COMPACTION OF THE AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE DONE JUST PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE. THE FINISHED SURFACE OF THE BASE SHALL SHOW NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH FROM A TEN (10) FOOT STRAIGHT EDGE. 16. TACK COAT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT 2357.2.A. - Know what's below. Call before you dig. 20 60 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES NO 94 13523 60TH STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082 T 651-XXXX ZEMAN CONSTRUCTION SCOTT PETERS 8900 10TH AVENUE N GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 T 763-398-8930 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT EAGLES 94 STILLWATER, MN ISSUE SITE PLAN REVIEW 10/20/2017 REVISION DATE SHEET INDEX C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 SITE & UTILITY PLAN C-201 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-501 DETAILS L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Civil Engineering 1 Landscape Architecture I Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a dul icensed Professional Engineer under the laws of th NNESOTA. \ok C:c \O CNS� G Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 10/20/17 SHEET C201ARC09.DWG GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-201 PROJECT NO. SCALE IN FEET ARC17009 SAW CUT TACK COAT ALL EDGES NEW PAVEMENT NOTE: SAW CUT ALL EDGES. REMOVE BITUMINOUS AND ENOUGH AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CURB. SA CUT BITUMINOUS AT MATCHLINE 3/8" ft ° ° 4 114" R ° °d ° 1 d d a A d ° d d ° a TOOLED CONTROL JOINT SPACING: 5' WALK- 5' C/C 6' WALK - 6' C/C JOINT SEALER EXPANSION JOINT NON BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLER MAXIMUM SPACING 100'. ALSO USE WHEN ABUTTING BUILDINGS. SI E AL OINT STORM GRATE REINFORCED CORNERS MANAGEABLE 2 FOOT CONTAINMENT AREA CURB OPENING LIFT STRAPS DUMPING STRAPS INLET PROTECTION NO SCALE CURB FILTER OPTIONAL OUTFLOW PORTS NO SCALE NO SCALE (2) CONTROL JOINTS SHALL EXTEND TO BOTH THE FRONT AND BACKS OF THE CURB AND BE 2" DEEP AT 10' MAX SPACING. 1/2"R SLOPE 3/4" PER FT. 12" B 2 CURB GUTTER 6" NOMINAL STEEL PIPE, EXTRA STRONG ASTM A 53 GRADE B, FILL WITH CONCRETE PAINT POST YELLOW 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT W/ JOINT SEALER PAVEMENT 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT TYP. ALL INSTALLATIONS 0 L, 1/2" 1- 0 M 1'-6" IN PAVEMENT AREA PIPE BOLLAR NO SCALE NO SCALE EXISTING 2.5" BITUMINOUS SURFACE EXISTING 7" AGGREGATE BASE EXISTING SUBGRADE (DO NOT DISTURB) (3) 12" in 0 CONCRETE PA EMENT GUTTER NEW CONCRETE SLAB #4 BAR 24" 0.C. BOTH DIRECTIONS 2"X2"X16" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 4" SPACING. INCREASE SPACING IN HIGH FLOW AREAS. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE FILTER LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45d WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. RUNOFF FLOW 6 8" - 12" FILTER LOG SEDIMENT CONTROL STAKE T 8"-12" FILTER LOG SEDIMENT CONTROL NO SCALE USE KNITTED POLYPROPYLENE TUBES FOR TEMPORARY INSTALLATIONS OR JUTE OR BURLAP WHEN DEGRADATION IN PLACE IS DESIRED. ILTER LOG SE IMENT CONTROL NO SCALE FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES NO 94 13523 60TH STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082 T 651-XXXX ZEMAN CONSTRUCTION SCOTT PETERS 8900 10TH AVENUE N GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 T 763-398-8930 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT EAGLES 94 STILLWATER, MN ISSUE SITE PLAN REVIEW 10/20/2017 REVISION DATE SHEET INDEX C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 SITE & UTILITY PLAN C-201 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-501 DETAILS L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a dul Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of NNESOTA. O1 CONS Stephen M. Johnston DATE REGISTRATION NO. 18914 10/20/17 SHEET C501ARC09.DWG DETAILS C-501 PROJECT NO. ARC17009 REMOVE ALL POT AND ALL PLASTIC LOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTING SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTS PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) LANDSCAPE PLAN NO SCALE z 0 WlllwUu.dm,N6uM (3) 0 SEE PLAN AN) PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING 12" MIN. PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS SET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADE MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTS MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) LOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTING SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING PERENNIAL PLANTING ■ i NO SCALE PLANT SCHEDULE KEY QUANT. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE ROOT COND. MATURE SIZE DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SB 15 GOLDFLAME SPIREA SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 18" HT. 'GOLDFLAME' POT 2.5'H X 3'W EVERGREEN SHRUBS JV 6 JC 8 GREY OWL JUNIPER MANEY JUNIPER JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 18" SP. 'GREY OWL' JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 24" HT. 'MANEYI' POT 2.5'H X 4'W POT 4'H X 5'W PERENNIALS HB 35 BODACIOUS RETURNS DAYLILY HEMEROCALLIS 1 GAL. 'BODACIOUS RETURNS' POT 1.5'H X 2'W SUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, SUBMIT WRITTEN DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND/OR INSTALLATION. 15 HB O UJ 3 SB EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING ADDITION 4,614 +/- SF. 10 HB 6SB 6 JV 10 HB 6SB LEGEND ROCK MULCH 2 L-101 SHRUB PLANTING (TYP) 3 \ PERENNIAL PLANTING (TYP) L-101 REINSTALL ROCK MULCH ON NEW WEED BARRIER FABRIC. ADD ROCK MULCH AS NEEDED TO MIN. 4" DEPTH. SIZE AND COLOR OF ADDITIONAL ROCK MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING. SHED TRASH ENCLOSURE LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE FINAL GRADES ARE MET AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THE CURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION. 3. QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACE PLANTS IN PROPER SPACING FOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES. 4. WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE BLACK POLYPROPYLENE SHEET 27 MILS THICK, 4 OZ/SQ.YD, TENSILE STRENGTH PER ASTM D-4632. PRODUCT BY DEWITT COMPANY OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. PLANTING SOIL FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE MINIMUM SIX (6) INCHES IN DEPTH. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE WELL -GRADED SOIL, FRIABLE AND FERTILE, FREE OF HARDPACK SUBSOIL, STONES AND NOXIOUS WEEDS, AND HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.5 AND 7.5. PLANTING SOIL TO BE A MIXTURE OF SELECTED TOPSOIL BORROW (MNDOT 3877 TYPE B), PEAT MOSS OR COMPOSTED YARD WASTE AND FERTILIZER. MIXING PROPORTIONS SHALL BE ACCORDING TO LOOSE VOLUME RATIO AND HAVE A COMPOSITE ORGANIC CONTENT AT NO LESS THAN 15% AND NO GREATER THAN 20%. FERTILIZER SHALL BE SLOW RELEASE COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER AND ADDED IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO PROVIDE 0.05 POUND OF TOTAL NITROGEN PER CUBIC YARD OF PLANTING SOIL. 6. FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. NO WATER IS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND ENSURE THAT IRRIGATION DESIGN MEETS ALL CITY PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. 8. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PLANTS AND SOD IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT TWO YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD SHALL BEGIN UPON INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY CITY STAFF. 7 EXISTING TREES & VEGETATION TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD PRIVACY FENCE —\1/41 1"=20' 20 60 FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES NO 94 13523 60TH STREET N STILLWATER, MN 55082 T 651-XXXX ZEMAN CONSTRUCTION SCOTT PETERS 8900 10TH AVENUE N GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 T 763-398-8930 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-436-4030 PROJECT EAGLES 94 STILLWATER, MN ISSUE SITE PLAN REVIEW 10/20/2017 REVISION DATE SHEET INDEX C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 SITE & UTILITY PLAN C-201 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-501 DETAILS L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN Civil Engineering I Landscape Architecture Construction Services 901 N 3rd STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 p 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 www.elanlab.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESO CO Pilarsinee Saraithong DATE REGISTRATION NO. 45059 10/20/17 SHEET L101ARC09.DWG LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1O1 Know what's below. Call before you dig. SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO. ARC17009 1 EXISTING METAL ROOFING TO REMAIN �2'-311 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM 901 North Minneapolis, Third MN Street, 55401 Suite 220 Fax 612-436-4030 612-692-9960 L• L•C• T.O. ROOF 12 / EL 1221_10" — — �5 201_8" 11.1. __—m-, EXISTING WOOD �� �— _ TRIM TO REMAIN C��1 �I 111 T ° ,�, , - Q a H - 'ill `\ ` I - � n 1 1 EXIST. METAL r II II Oyu lux{ ROOFING 4 SUTTER �� II L1---L__—� �� _ 1¢------J TO REMAIN r 1 r r o WOMEN MEN o , 1 1 1 1 ��_ / 014 I 013 1 I d���t '\ ELEC. / _ / j ////////////////////// ///////////////////////////////X/////////////////// • - — n __--_-- {Wh44fA'MlhYdJAWPN.SW�i..'L:SS!lAS9Y.9'/S�ihGS!h!J K'lRht p - III 11 T ELEG Hill_ WATER �__ D i 1I J L \ � / M DISHWASHING 1 fL 1 — — H ��. � � ---- � ��� i HALL � i1� 1 i = III 1021 I - _1 C ������..-L _� F.i_kF.E. \ \ ✓ d WH ,fI� t , , IIII Y n \REMOVE j/ \ J I - p - EL 100 -0 EXISTING EXISTING WINDOW EXIST. SCREENED WINDOWS ELEG. I, , I LI,=_=1 1 r I'mm'"r"� EXIST. DOOR $ WOOD SIDING TYP. TRIM TO REMAIN 4 TRIM TO REMAIN zA BEVERAGE LI - TRIM TO REMAIN EXISTING COLUMNS WOOD TO REMAINI r 1 I r I'_ y�.i1C-5) ..�.,— ELVATON L� EXISTIN6 I/8" = I'-O°r Cl MI o - RELOCATE EXIST. �r ,� 0 Q GOB II III I =, - 1 SIGNAGE VERIFY EXISTING METAL %' �; / COOLER LINE 1 I T.O. ROOF 12 1 011 1 1 ou I loos I SERVER J ° EL 122'-10" — �3 SIZE (7�I SF MAX) ROOFING TO REMAIN , PICK-UP I 1 / l 026 1 I:>- 1 11 EXIST. WOOD I NEW ; METAL TRIM ���� , 1 T' 1 DINING / ■I--- --- gyp H ROOM TRASH r i 10041 O I • EAGLESGUTTER EXIST. ROOFING REMAIN METAL 4 TO i �� ��� F, FJ / / / � I11 1� II III 1 I -_ 1„ cr II IL �1 •1===T� f7 "H / J `L II ✓ LJ l.L LFJ 1 U U STORAGE n • 1022 1 111F x •� I IIL/ : L.. J I' r L N 1 I - - - - r� -• Lp J ► L] Il 1 C] iri F.F.E. . EL 100'-0" \NEW SEXIST. EXISTING WOOD G Mark Revision / Issue Date EXIST. WINDOW - STUCCO- SCREENED COLUMNS - WRAP 0 1 I CASHIER ti EXIST. DOOR - WRAP TRIM W/ TEXTURED METAL WINDOWS 1 1003 1 I� WRAP TRIM W/ NEW METAL PANELS TYP. —� W/ NEW METAL TRIM 4 r 1 CITY SUBMITTAL 10-20-I-1 TRIM ///////////iiiiiiiii////////////////////////// //Y//////// ///// /// 1 i J NEW METAL TRIM SOUTH ELEVATION 1__, \ I 1 I 1 111� 1 + ; L 1,, 1" ___ _ - _ _ Iu� r `-"`-`-y"-` �° w � —I- (4) 1 C7 QUEUE -UP -'VESTIBULE PROPOSED 1/8 " = -0 " u 1 1----� -��� 002 I ooI I OFFICE "� TAKE-OUT 501-0" 0[21-5" 1004 1 10211 1 ---- - - rr L3 _ _ y/y�i - Mt ===' +� a-♦rrx n, :..yin �. .., .,,, • ., ,1 t ' ,, VEST. / - 1 029 11 s xuxv,a •:^ 0❑ \L Q LJ� LJ� 1 VESTIBULE l l l ° 0E1- J r I r I r I SCREENED PORCH 7 7 �� �� �-� �� 10021 t ter► L��-�-�-� ��� ELEG — — ,,,,,,,,,•,...,.,;, - 0. �4u S:kdL AySSS4!QhS4tLH4L9lttLyd :Y 4!:SS49LS:1 0 -[_111 XISTIN�LOOi�L,�N L� L� L A � WOMEN i MEN T C� ELEG 1—j1 1014 1 II 1 WATER 07 I 013 I IL I1 I /8 1 11 " MECH. -' �_-_- _L1 = -0 24X 1 u1 r L IL z_ Jl 1 1023 ( 05E 1 - -� [L _I L- L \G /7" �/ ` Q /7 \/ O w c . 40 y\ r - J � ° wr \c- V /------„ \\.- V ,� %7 ELEG) 1 0 7 ' I u Z Z , 111 -- � 11 — �� - 0 HALL o III I I o I I [L _ IL 1 ° y ' i I' 1 021 I } LA LA + ELEG. ELEG, ' J I 42" DOOR 1 11 _ - - .� - ° EAGLES RELOCATION STILLWATER AERIE , MN 94 BANQUET ] - 1.zaT r/������„�-��„ HALL Q — %L BR —EASE DISHWASHING 0 _I L 0 o 4Rn� ° 1 OI6 - - j ;��� y ,LPL y 1 ° ii / y / O COOLER T n 1 I I / I OI7 1 Z�,,,,, , ,,,, L A A _1 ' �� �O �� �� GOOK k ��LH SIGNAGE AREA 4�� � ���—�� 103� 1 ILo 1 4 > _������ STAGE Z SEAT �A m 1 A BUILDING SIGNAGE - SOUTH ELEVATION: 0 -79 FRONTAGE = 79 SF MAX. SIZE FLOOR ELEVATIONS PLAN / v_[--, -, O� O� - EXISTING EAGLES SIGN TO BE �\ �\ � II � � o o PREP �, % IBOAR � � O RELOCATED D �� �� �� ,�� 1eOb, ;, - ��vv v\ // I FREE-STANDING SIGNAGE I60 ;� �,> _,/ N> /� '- ��1-� SEATS i___ _, - 100 SF MAX. SIZE 7� 7� / _ 7��7 - EXISTING EAGLES SIGN TO BE \1--1 �� Z ,1--1 ' <Oo° sT0RA6E OFF ICE • k ��� Li 1 RELOCATED y' 1 / 1022 1 1021 I 4/ 1 4 j1 / 0 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////4////////////////////// TOTAL ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA: — + — - %L-' �� � f � '-r` I I OFFICE 100 SF + 15% OF SOUTH BLDG. WALL AREA (1, 326 SF x 0.15 = 199 SF) PROJECT NUMBER: 1-1-1044-01 \ f- STORAGE I Q281 �O �� ff 1031 1 1 299 SF MAX. ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA DATE: 10-20-1-1 -1� - \L-1< C \LJL L \-1( k ABS DRAWN YBL y 9 / 001 l I - " y CHECKED BY: KA - ...w..^ f,.YY.KHV +SDI SHEET INDEX VESTIBULE 10301 1 VESTIBULE 1 t A 1 fi T T A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS fx 9 I - ❑ �� SF 4,53�i SF 10,534 SF C:: EXISTING ADDITION TOTAL NORTH PROFOSE FLOOR PLAN 05,c1c15 1/8" = I'-0" Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2017 EXISTING STEEL GATE FRAME ARCHITECTU 901 North Minnea Minneapolis, Third olis MN Street, 55401 Suite 220 Fax 612-436-4030 612-692-9960 RAL L. L.c. PAINTED STEEL NEW ADDITION EXISTING BLDG. EXIST. WCONSORTIUM 11111911 11 BOLLARDS T.O. ROOF TRIM -WRAP W/ EXISTING METAL NEW METAL TRIMROOFING TO REMAIN • ■ ■ NEW PREF IN. EL 122to T EXISTING PAINTED METAL ROOFING T.O. STEEL 12 �EXIST. WOOD TRIM -WRAP W/ WOOD HEAVY GATES EL 118'-4" J' 4� NEW METAL TRIM DUTY GATE LATCH $ CANE BOLTS STEEL W METAL $E O (EXTMETAL ROOT 11 FRONT ELEVATION GUTTER TO 1 REMAIN NEW DOWNSPOUT---- `,1 j --PREFIN. `/ METAL NEW STUCCO- GAP FLASHING / r ;. TEXTURED METAL ---PA PAINTED GMU PANELS TYP. _ _/ STORAGE SHED - TO MATCH �) T �' �INFILL DOOR EXTERIOR EXIST. BLDG. OPENING MATERIALS TO v �I T MATCH BUILDING AF.F.E. 7 I - •fFEL I00' O" - / _ EXISTING WOOD TYP. SIDE / REAR RELOCATED �NEW STUCCO- EXIST. WINDOWS - NEW DOWNSPOUT' NEW H.M. DOOR / COLUMNS ELEVATION DOWNSPOUT TEXTURED METAL WRAP TRIM W/ -WRAP C8 STORAGE SHEDTRASH ENCLOSURE FRAME W/ PREF IN,/ METAL TRIM PANELS TYP. NEW METAL TRIM - W/ NEW METAL TRIM / I/8" = I'-O" } 1/8" = I'-O" WEST ELEVATION EXISTING METAL ROOFING TO REMAIN / REMOVE FALSE IN EXISTING T.O. ROOF PROPOSED ED T.O. ROOF REMOVE FALSE EXISTING WINDOWS /ROOFING EXISTING METAL TO REMAIN I/8" = I'-O" V EL 122'-10" EXISTING CLAY EXISTING CLAY EL 122'-10" J W EXISTING WOOD 12 EL 120'-8" TILE COPING TILE COPING EL 120'-8" 12 TRIM TO REMAIN - EXISTING PAINTED GMU EXISTING PAINTED GMU- 4 —_ EXISTING WOOD EXIST. METAL T.O. GMU di AI T.O. GMU TRIM TO REMAIN ROOFING $ r-=r--1- r-r--1i r-rr--i r--Ir-1I �� EL 115'-4" EL 115'-4" Ir-rr-1I 1r--Ir-1 i IL_JL_JI IL JL_J 'L_JL_JI II II I it II I li II GUTTER TO I- rr lI r _ �r II r �r 11 REMOVE. _JL_ Ir rr 11 _JL Ir - rr _JI 11 Ir _JL_I +r 11 II II 11 II II 11 II I EX15T. METAL REMAIN - IL 11 IL JI 'L JL J' 'L Ji JI IL JL JI IL JL JP JI JI EXI LIGHT TIL ROOFING & `_' REMOVE TO REMOVE "r_ 7-[� EXIST. TRASH ,� -�--i-c REMAIGUTTER EXIST. ENCLOSURE TRASH . _ - �' Mark Revision / Issue Date -� Ni- - _ I ', ENCLOSURE , �_ I"I = _ _ L - _ 1 EXISTING WOOD F CITY SUBMITTAL 10-20-I-1 J 1.4. ■ _ COLUMNS TO - - 1 1 REMAIN --- ■ ,____ I.11' II 1 =-_ I 1 . i 1q4 'I I \ F.F.E. ;�1 ✓` -EXIST. TRIM - EXISTING COLUMNS SCREENED TO REMAIN WOOD TO REMAIN WINDOWS C;) EAST ELEVATION EXIST. TRIM DOOR TO REMAIN \ `REMOVE EXISTING IN WOOD SIDG TYP. - EXIST. METER ELECTRICAL CABINET Y EL 100'-OII DEMO ROOF COLUMNS, PORTION OF OVERHANG, DOWNSPOUT WEST )1\ ELEVATION EXISTING COLUMNS WOOD TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING - WOOD SIDG IN TYP. EXISTING $ TRIM WINDOWS TO REMAIN L EXISTING DOWNSPOUT REMOVE EXIST. DOOR $ TRIM EXISTING EXIST. WOOD I/8" = 1'-O" EXISTING BLDG. NEW ADDITION 3 EXISTING 8'-0"I± I/8" = I'-O" EXISTING ROOFING METAL TO REMAIN TRIM NEW - WRAP METAL IN/ TRIM T.O. SIGN T.O. ROOF NEW •fFEL 125'-0" MAX. �EAGLES� EXIST. WOOD EL 122 -10 METALRROOFING RELOCATE +1 TRIM - WRAPW/ — 12 EL 120'-8" T.O. STEEL EXISTING SIGNS - 100 �, 94 J O 1 NEW METAL TRIM �� EXISTING CLAY EXISTING _ A ir EXIST. METAL TILE COPING PAINTED GMU EL 1181-4" T.O. STEEL SF MAX. SIZE- y READER BOARD SIGN ROOFING EL 115'-0"� GUTTER TO 1• REMAIN _,, NEW ALUM. WINDOWS NTED W/ PREFIN. METAL EAGLES R STILLWATER E AERIE L 0 CAT 10 MN N 94 STEEL POST TRIM SURROUND -� 1 _i '..... NEW STUGGO- . TEXTURED METAL PANELS TYP. DOWNSPOUT ,_NEW uII ` T � FA_ " EXIST. SCREENED WINDOWS $ TRIM TO REMAIN - EXISTING WOOD COLUMNS - WRAP W/ -EXIST. WRAP NEW METAL DOOR TRIM / IN/ TRIM NEW STUGGO- EXIST. ELECTRICAL TEXTURED METAL METER GAB INET PANELS TYP. NEW DOWNSPOUT ANEW FRAME METAL H.M. W/ TRIM DOOR $ PREFIN. EL 100 ..1) PYLON SIC N ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR NEW METAL TRIM( EAST ELEVATION 1 1/8" = I'-O" PROPOSED REMOVE SCUPPERS REMOVE EXIST. (2) EXIST\ 12 I/8" = I'-O" EXISTING REMOVE EXIST. TILE GOP WOOD 51DING TYP. EXISTING ING CLAY EXISTING METAL ROOFING BEYOND12 NEW TEXTURED ST000O- METAL LIGHTS (2) 3 /w PAINTED GMU 3 PANELS TYP. STEEL ALT.O. — — — 12 __ _ —_ — _ OUTL 1 NE OF NEW EL 118'-4" _ - - ---, TO. GMU - - - - ADDITION SHOWN -- - --- - - _-; ;`.,-- _ _ T.O. STEEL AL EL 115'-4" ;; T FOR REFERENCE I— 115'-O" t- -i--� _ NUMBER: - - 1 PROJECT NUM 17 1044 O • NEW ALUM. WINDOWS ;. ' 11 L_; L_; °^ - -------- / DEMO PORTION OF • •. ISSUED DATE 10-20-17 1 W/ PREFIN. METAL `C ll_II=rr rr_rS�= ROOF OVERHANG 1 TRIM SURROUND — DRAWN BY: BL REMOVE EXIST. j-'' $ COLUMNS ��� J' {} {a- CHECKED BY: KA WOOD SIDING TYP. r \ I [T ;--,-ic31 I: NEW STUGGO- • �J . I 1 REMOVE EXIST. TEXTURED METAL / 1— - - 7 '4 : SIDING TYP. PANELS TYP. • dJ , IWOOD I.I I A2 F.F.E. 1 L : 46, . F.Fi_k.E. REMOVE PORTION REMOVE EXIST. EL 100' 0" RELOCATE EXIST. / -- EXISTING H.M. RELOCATE EXIST. SAS METER / DOOR $ FRAME TRASH GATES / OF EXIST. GMU DOWNSPOUT NEW H.M. DOOR ItOUTLINE OF EXISTING REMOVE EXIST. REMOVE EXIST. TRASH WALL FOR NEW FRAME W/ PREFIN. BLDG. SHOWN FOR DOWNSPOUT WALLS $ BOLLARDS OPENING METAL TRIM REFERENCE NORTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION C5) PROPOSED I/8" = 1'-O" EXISTING I/8" = I'-O" (6) Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2017 DESIG 901 N 3rd St, Suite 120 Minneapolis, MN 55401 tel 612.260.7980 fax 612.260.7990 N www.elanlab.com DATE: October 19, 2017 TO: Mike Isensee, MSCWMO Shawn Sanders, PE, City of Stillwater Brett Loftesnes, Architectural Consortium Scott Peters, Zeman Construction FROM: Steve Johnston, PE RE: Eagles 94 Stormwater Management MEMORANDUM This proposed project scope includes the construction of a 4,614sf addition to the existing vacant Famous Dave's building in Stillwater in an area currently occupied by parking and landscaping resulting in a net decrease in impervious surfaces of 594 sf. In total 5,464 sf impervious surfaces are either new or totally reconstructed. An additional 942 sf of bituminous surface will be converted to concrete by removing the pavement layer and a portion of the aggregate base but not disturbing the subgrade. The site will continue to drain to two catch basins in the NW corner of the parking lot. From there runoff is directed to an existing rate control and water quality pond along the north property line. Given the reduction in impervious surfaces rate control is achieved. Given that there will be less than 6,000 sf of new and reconstructed impervious surfaces volume control is not required under MSCWMO rules. Since the existing parking lot will not be disturbed during construction limited sediment and erosion control is required. The plans show inlet protection in the two on site catch basins and fiber log barriers. Concrete trucks should use on -board washout facilities. If tracking were to occur the contractor should install rumble racks to remove soil materials from vehicle tires. All disturbed areas will be landscaped or revegetated with topsoil or sod. If there are any questions please let me know. CUSTOM PANEL SYSTEMS 3991 Green Pork Rd. • St. Louis. MO 63125 • 314.631.9244 Fax 314.631.3003 Metal Wall Panels Pre -Finished Stucco Building Panels Specification Part 1 — General 1.1 Summary A. Section Includes: 1. Pre -finished, prefabricated metal wall panels with interlocking seams. 2. Coordinate with fabrication of wall area substructure. 3. Provide color coordinated start, end, and corner flashings. 1.2 System Description A. Design Requirements: 1. Provide 16" wide module factory preformed wall panel system that has been pre- tested and certified by the manufacture to comply with specified requirements under installed conditions. 2. Provide one piece, single length panels where possible. 3. Provide panel with continuous interlocking side joints and stackabie end joints for vertical application. 4. Panel side joint design must conceal panel attachment fasteners. 5. Panel ends should be notched and retumed 90 www.customponeisystems.com At degrees to provide for panel stacking conditions. 6. Air Infiltration — Provide wall system that has been tested in accordance with DCBCCD PA 202 test procedure with a test pressure of 1.57 PSF. Measured result .03 CFM/SF. 7. Water Infiltration — When tested in accordance with DCBCCD PA 202 at a test pressure of 7.5 PSF, no water infiltration. 8. Large Missile Impact — When tested in accordance with DCBBCD PA 201 at approximately 50 FT/Sec, passed. 9. Fatigue Load Testing — Provide panels that have been tested for a minimum of 500 cycles in accordance with DCBBCD PA 203 at a design load of +25 PSF and —25 PSF with no panel or fastener failure. 10. Provide factory preformed panel system that has been pre -tested and certified by manufacturer to comply with specked requirements under installed conditions. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Submit manufacturer's product literature, standard color chart, standard detail drawings, and installation instructions. 1.4 Quality Assurance A. Manufacturer's Qualifications: 1. Five years minimum experience in factory fabrication of metal wall panel systems. 2. Products listed in this specification section are as specified by Custom Panel Systems. 3. No other bidder of metal wall systems will be accepted without prior written approval of Architect based upon alternate products meeting specified requirements. 4. Substitution request must be submitted in writing minimum of ten days prior to bid date accompanied by product literature, technical information, and product sample. Approved substitutions will be set forth in an addendum. 5. No substitutions will be permitted after bid date. 1.5 DELIVERY, STORAGE and HANDLING A. Protect products and accessories from damage and discolorization during transit and at project site. Store sheets and components in a dry storage area to prevent condensation. 1.6 WARRANTY A. Panel shall be warranted against cracking, checking, peeling, chipping, flaking or excessive fading for a period of 20 years. B. The panel is warranted to be free of defect in material or factory workmanship for a period of 3 years from the date of shipment. Part 2 — Products 2.1 MATERIALS A. Panels: 1. Pre -finished G-90 galvanized steel sheet, per ASTM A653 as described in ASTM specification A924. 2. Panels shall be a minimum 20 gauge nominal thickness. B. Fasteners: 1. Fasteners shall be 12-14 x 1 Y<" long, self -drilling, self - tapping, hex head, coated carbon screws with washers for panel attachment. (not supplied by manufacturer) C. Accessories: 1. Provide manufacturer's standard trim and accessories and other items essential to completeness of wall system. 2. Contiguous flashings shall be factory fabricated by panel manufacturer from 24 gauge nominal thickness G90 galvanized steel with textured pre -finished factory applied coating to match panels. 2.2 FABRICATION A. Panels: 1. Provide factory formed panel module of 16" with nominal 5/8" depth. 2. Maximum panel length 25' 0". Provide panels in longest length possible. B. Joints: 1. Provide continuous interlocking panel side joints and end joints notched and returned 90 degrees to provide for panel stacking conditions. 2.3 FINISH A. Special Coating: 1. Epoxy primer coat shall be factory applied to face and back of panel to a dry film thickness of 1 to 1.5 mils. 2. Factory applied finish coat consisting of a fiber reinforced polymer/aggregate and oven cured. 3. Color: As selected by Architect from manufacturer's standard colors. Special match or custom colors are also available, consult manufacturer. 8. Coating Performance: 1. Coating shall be tested by an independent laboratory to meet the following criteria: a. Condensing Humidity — When tested in accordance to ASTM D4585-97 for 1000 Hours at 120 degrees F. Result —10, No Change. b. QUV Weatherometer — When tested in accordance with ASTM G154-00- for 1000 hours (500 light hours), Result — 10, No Change. c. Cyclic Freeze -Thaw with Humidity — When tested in accordance with ASTM D4585-97-2 Hours Humidity @ 120 Degree F. 2 Hours Freezer @ 10 degrees F, Total Exposer 50 Cycles, result —10, No Change. d. Salt Spray Resistance — When tested in accordance with ASTM B 117-97 for 1000 hours, 5% Salt Fog @ 95 degrees F, Result —10, No Change. e. Coating Test Evaluation Procedure shall be in accordance with ASTM D 1654-92 (2000), Evaluation of Painted or Coated Specimens Subjected to Corrosive Environments. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Substrate: 1. Examine substrate or secondary framing to ensure that it is properly secured and prepared to receive wall panels. 2. Ensure substrate or secondary framing is installed flat, free from objectionable warp, wave, and buckle. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. Comply with manufacturer's instructions for assembly, installation, and erection. 8. Metal Wall Systems: 1. Install panels in accordance with manufacturer's instruction and recommendations. 2. Anchor securely in place using fasteners spaced in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. 3. Fully seat adjacent panel to achieve continuous engagement in interlocking seams. C. Dissimilar Metals: 1. Where sheet metal is in contact with dissimilar metals, execute juncture to facilitate drainage and minimize possibility of galvanic action. 2. At point of contact with dissimilar metal, coat metal with protective paint or tape, which can be placed between metals. 3.3 CLEANING A. Clean exposed surfaces of work promptly. Clean with water under pressure and/or a light solution. End of Section Superior coatings coupled with reliable product engineering provide excellence in building system construction solutions. Ceram-A-Star°1050 Panel Colors The next generation silicone -polyester Cool Chemistry® coating system is here! Engineered by Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc.* to provide a 40-year film integrity warranty against peeling, flaking or loss of adhesion, these coatings also offer high solar reflectivity in medium and dark colors. The CERAM-A-STAR1050 coatings dramatically reduce energy consumption and associated costs especially in hot, sunny climates. CERAM-A-STAR1050 outperforms similar coatings based on real -world exposure testing in South Florida. Its use of proprietary resin technology and ceramic pigments provide exceptional exterior durability as well as energy savings. It is available in a full spectrum of colors with a 30-year performance warranty covering chalking and fading. Coatings accommodate "cool" technology and "green building" compliance. * Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. produces coatings recognized as the highest quality in the industry. Adhering to tight quality control procedures, they meet and exceed specifications and standards set forth by the American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM) and ISO 9001 certification. 4" 4" PURLIN BEARING FEATURE 4" 12" 4" 4" PBR PANEL 3 SPACES AT 12" = 36" COVERAGE REVERSE PANEL 3 SPACES AT 12" = 36" COVERAGE 26 Gauge Stock Colors with Trim Available in all Colors Standing seam available in two colors - White and Galvalume® Actual color may vary slightly from color samples shown. If color choice is critical, request a color sample. Because of changing trends in color popularity, the colors illustrated are subject to change without notice. POLAR WHITE TSR 0.64 PEARL GRAY SLATE GRAY TSR 0.25 1 " 1%" BURNISHED SLATE TSR 0.32 BRITE RED TSR 0.34 RUSTIC RED TSR 0.27 SAHARA TAN TSR 0.51 LIGHTSTONE TSR 0.60 COLONY GREEN TSR 0.35 FERN GREEN TSR 0.30 HAWAIIAN BLUE TSR 0.33 GALLERY BLUE TSR 0.25 © 2007 Interactive Enterprises Corporation Film Properties SUBSTRATE Test Methods & Descriptions CERAM-A-STAR9050 Hot Dipped Galvanized Aluminum Galfan & Galvalume® Dry Film Thickness: ASTM' D1400, D1005, D4138 0.20 - 0.25 Mils Primer (NCCA2 11-13,14,15) 0.70 - 0.90 Mils Topcoat 0.20 - 0.25 Mils Primer 0.70 - 0.90 Mils Topcoat PHYSICAL PROPERTIES ASTM D523 35% ASTM D3363 (NCCA 11 - 12) "F" - Minimum Eagle Turquoise Pencil NCCA 11 - 9 2T - No Tape -Off ASTM D522 180° bend No Tape Off around 1/8" mandrel ASTM D3359 (NCCA 11 - 5) Reverse Impact Cross Hatch No Adhesion Loss ASTM D2794 (NCCA II - 6) 80 inch -pound impact with a 5/8" steel No Adhesion Loss ball or, = 2000 x decimal steel thickness in inches 35% "F" - Minimum 2T - No Tape -Off No Tape Off No Adhesion Loss No Adhesion Loss 60° Specular Gloss: Pencil Hardness: Flexibility: T-Bend Mandrel Bend Adhesion: Reverse Impact: ABUSE TOLERANCE ASTM D968, Liters to expose 30 Liters Per 5/32" area of substrate Mil of Film Based on topside to backer contact in Acceptable transit after painting AAMA8 605.2 (24 Hour Pat Test) No Effect ASTM D2248 3%@ 100°F, 72 Hours No Effect 30 Liters Per Mil of Flinn Acceptable No Effect No Effect Abrasion Resistance: Falling Sand Transit Mortar Resistance: Detergent Resistance: RESISTANCE TO CORROSION, CHEMICALS & POLLUTION No Effect No Effect < 5 dE Color Change' 10 cycles' Minimal Effect 3000 Hours4 1500 Hours' Acid Pollutants: 10% Muriatic Acid 20%0 Sulfuric Acid 70% Nitric Acid Vapors Kesternich Test Alkali Resistance: Sodium Hydroxide Salt Fog: Humidity: Per ASTM D1308, Proc.6.2 : 24 Hours No Effect 24 Hours No Effect AAMA 605.2,ASTM G87 (30 Minutes) < 5 dE Color Change6 SO2 CyclicTest, 2 Liters 10 cycles' ASTM D1308 10%, 25% (1 Hour) Minimal Effect ASTM B117 5% Salt Fog @ 95 °F 1000 Hours4 ASTM D2247 100% Relative Humidity @ 100 °F 1500 Hours' WEATHERING PROPERTIES ASTM D822, G152, G153 Weatherometer 2000 Hours ASTM D2244 Color < 5 dE Color Change6 ASTM D4214 Chalk Maximum #8 Per ASTM D4141 Superior Results Superior: Maximum ASTM D2244 Color < 5 dE Color Change6 ASTM D659 Chalk Maximum #8 AAMA 605.2 Less than 20% film loss 2000 Hours < 5 dE Color Change' Maximum #8 Superior Results Superior: Maximum < 5 dE Color Change' Maximum #8 Less than 20% film loss Accelerated Weathering: EMMAQUA Testing: Exterior Weathering : Florida Exposure 10 Years @ 45° South Film Erosion 1 American Society Testing and Materials 2 National Coil Coaters Association 3 Higher and lower glosses available upon request. 4 Less than 1/8" creep from scribe. No more than few #8 blisters. 5 No objectionable color change. 6 Hunter d (delta) E color difference units. 7 No more than few #8 blisters. 8 American Architectural Manufacturers Association } • CERAM-A-STAR' 1050 is a trademark of Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. For more information contact: Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc. • 1313 Windsor Avenue AKZO NOBEL Columbus, OH 43216-0147 • (614)294-3361 • FAX (614)294-0436 —.-- www.akzonobel-ccna.com Mr. Lee J Gramenz 1945 Westridge Cir. Stillwater, MN 55082-6391 ,ZrdM 17'1 ,?7/7 _IL ,?6,747/7 _ be/e4-7--e--4/- .e_:7„,/,fte,5/1 _ ram,),/ :7 1-W7.__ / a'._-s, ,j7s �� , _1414/7. 674/./2 .012/2_14g7/ ri,(// (1,/e71/40 Fc-7-c ye,77-s; _ _174.KL, irz? kt s _a,/±-7_, cq:7- G Mr. Lee J Gramenz 1945 Westrid a Cir. Stillwater, MN 55082-6391 �G1s rs f:67:,?",_//9 _ _e/z 6/27-1//y 7„r; 1,40-/-7,/ _hg77 _e /I Q T % , . ` . ._77.<',/ 7'7 Zs c>-., ( it . r . _ _ /22 r recv_sP dr e_g 7; a' 2,7 AL(' v / 41Hcile=(/../ #6,zfr.s c'xr,7:;:o24 (;7.) ,1_1__50.7 // ) 77 (Vd,, 7;---1, G /» yie?i/i/ w (5,A7