Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-03-22 CC MIN Changed from 2016-03-15 ater TOE JIlTN/LICE OF NINNEIOTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 22,2016 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Mayor Kozlowski called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Staff present: City Administrator McCarty City Attorney Magnuson Police Chief Gannaway Fire Chief Glaser Public Works Director Sanders Community Development Director Turnblad City Planner Wittman Finance Director Harrison City Clerk Ward PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Kozlowski led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of March 8, 2016 regular, recessed and executive session meeting minutes Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to approve the minutes of the March 8, 2016 regular, recessed and executive session meetings. All in favor, with Mayor Kozlowski abstaining. PETITIONS,INDIVIDUALS,DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS Possible approval of recommendations for General Obligation Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 2016A and General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B — Dave McGillivray, Springsted Inc. Dave McGillivray, Springsted Inc., explained the recommendations for the bonds. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Polehna,to adopt Resolution 2016- 056, resolution providing for the issuance and sale of$6,505,000 General Obligation Capital Outlay bonds, Series 2016A and levying a tax for the payment thereof. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Junker,to adopt Resolution 2016- 057,resolution providing for the issuance and sale of$2,450,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding bonds, Series 2016B, and pledging tax increments for the payment thereof City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None 2016 Lumberjack Days event update - The Locals Brad Glynn and Erin McQuay updated the Council on plans for Lumberjack Days 2016. They noted that the City got the name Lumberjack Days back. The web site lumberjackdays.com will be up and running soon. OPEN FORUM Tom Murphy, 601 Olive Street, presented a petition of non-support for the Olive Street reconstruction project signed by 85%of property owners,that objects to the assessment. He added that many people felt if they voiced concerns at the public hearing for the project it would be a waste of time,because they were told it was not the right time to voice objections to assessments, only to discuss whether the project was needed. Mayor Kozlowski suggested that maybe the Council should revisit its assessment policy. Councilmember Junker pointed out that the street has not been reconstructed since the 1970s, and Mr. Murphy responded that therefore the City would ask the current property owners to pay for 46 years of poor maintenance. Councilmember Weidner reasoned that there should be a corresponding increase in property values; the City has an obligation to maintain the infrastructure. Mr. Murphy replied that the proposed assessments are reducing property values, especially for those selling their property. Steve Meister, Meister's Bar & Grill, brought up the problem of drivers disregarding stop signs at Fourth and Churchill Streets; he would like to see solar flashing lights installed. Public Works Director Sanders explained that the City needs to determine if LED stop signs are warranted and then consider the cost. Police Chief Gannaway stated the City can do extra patrols there. STAFF REPORTS Police Chief Gannaway reminded residents to lock their garages. Fire Chief Glaser informed the Council that the DNR is enforcing spring burning restrictions. City Administrator McCarty stated there is a final candidate for the HR manager position. He reminded the Council of the League of Minnesota Cities Conference June 14-17 in St. Paul. He also noted staff will be tracking Governor Dayton's proposed supplemental budget for any items of interest to the City. CONSENT AGENDA Resolution 2016-058, directing the payment of bills Resolution 2016-059, approving the transfer of the Off-Sale Liquor and Tobacco Licenses from CWPHRC Inc., DBA: Stillwater Liquors to Water to Wine LLC, DBA: Stillwater Liquors Resolution 2016-060, approving appointment to Joint Cable Commission Possible approval of temporary liquor license—July 4, 2016— Stillwater Library Foundation Resolution 2016-061, approving plans for County project CSAH 12: CSAH 15 to CSAH 5 Possible approval of Liability Coverage—Waiver Form—LMCIT Page 2 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Resolution 2016-062, approving a Special Use Permit for Lakeview Hospital to operate a sleep study center at 850 Churchill Street West (Planning Case No. 2016-09) Possible approval of 2016 Central St. Croix Valley Joint Cable Communication Commission budget Resolution 2016-063, approving settlement Possible approval of noise variance for United Way's Fiesta de Giving Resolution 2016-065, approving the expenditure for Big Belly solar trash/recycling compactors Possible approval of temporary liquor license— Church of St. Michael Resolution 2016-066, approving contract for professional services related to updating the Downtown Plan Resolution 2016-067, approving contract for design services related to Police Station and City Hall remodeling project Councilmember Junker requested that Resolution 2016-063, a resolution approving settlement, be pulled from the Consent Agenda. Motion by Councilmember Weidner, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to adopt the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Weidner, to approve Resolution 2016-063, a resolution approving settlement. Councilmember Junker recused himself from the vote. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None Abstain: Councilmember Junker PUBLIC HEARINGS Case 2016-13 A public hearing to consider a request by Brian Farrell for consideration of a concept Planned Unit Development,Zoning Text and Zoning Map Amendments for Northland Senior Living, a proposed 50 acre, multi-use Senior Care Living Facility to be located at 12525 75th Street North, currently located in the LR and AP Zoning Districts. PID: 3003020420040. City Planner Wittman reviewed the request that Brian Farrell with Northland Real Estate would like to develop a multi-use senior care living facility on County Road 12, just east of the Rutherford Elementary School. Six parcels are included in the development: 12525 and 12721 75th Street North and 12520 72nd Street North, as well as adjacent vacant lands to the east and southeast of these parcels, formerly known as Jackson Wildlife Management area. The facility, known as Croix Bay, will be developed in cooperation with multiple stakeholders, including Ebenezer Senior Care and Landform Professional Services, LLC. On March 9, 2016 the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the concept development and associated applications. Ms. Wittman went on to state that, since the Planning Commission hearing, staff has received numerous comments, including requests to table the Council's consideration of the matter until a later date. The 60-day deadline for consideration of the development application is April 19,2016. The Planning Commission recommends conditional approval of the concept Planned Unit Page 3 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Development, ZAT, and ZAM. Staff recommends to confirm the Planning Commission findings and recommendations, adopt the associated resolution, and approve the first reading of the ordinances. Councilmember Weidner asked about height restrictions, and Ms. Wittman replied that the developers propose a 40'10" structure in a district that limits height at 35'. The zoning text amendment being requested would apply to any senior care living facility in the future. Current zoning code states senior care living is a use permitted by SUP in lakeshore residential zone. Councilmember Weidner questioned whether the agricultural preserve zoning district is considered to be a holding zone for properties brought in to the City under the orderly annexation agreement and that the development would get the City closer to Metropolitan Council goals for housing density in Stillwater. City Planner Wittman concurred that the agricultural preserve zone in Stillwater is intended to be a holding zone until urban development occurs. She further noted this same process was used for other PUDs in the area, such as the Liberty and Legends neighborhoods. City Attorney Magnuson indicated that the City's AP zoning district is not an agricultural preserve under state laws for farm land—it is a different category. The zoning amendment proposed would eliminate the need for a variance for senior living when permitted in a PUD in a lakeshore district. Darren Lazan, representing Landform LLC, introduced the development team: Northland Real Estate Group (Brian Farrell); Landform Professional Services for planning and site design; Ebenezer for management and operations; Pope Architects, and Welsh Construction firm. Jill Nokleby Kaiser,Director of Housing Development for Ebenezer Management Services, stated the company has been around for 99 years. She explained its model of care: a person does not have to move to a separate area of the building to receive additional assisted living services. Mr. Lazan pointed out that developers believe the market has identified the need for senior living in Stillwater, and they have a waiting list of over 20 people already for this project. He reviewed the history of the property, including the preyiously approved senior living facility that was not built. He stated that present developers looked at the previous project; met with Grace Baptist Church about possible shared parking; met nearby resident Eldon who cleared scrub trees and planted thousands of trees and wildflowers; and then started to look at the using the maximum density in the smaller area, which would allow two-thirds of the raw site area to remain almost untouched, preserving natural areas. He added most of the planned complex has three stories, except where the natural grade allows a fourth story. Because the property is in the Shoreland overlay district, they are only allowed to build on 25% of the property. Limiting building height to 35' would eliminate roughly one-third of the units, meaning the facility could not be built as proposed. Developers need a certain number of units to support the high amenities. They want these to be very unique units. On average,the building height is 3.75 levels. Regarding the trail, Mr. Lazan stated developers will propose a conservation easement in perpetuity and would create connections to the public trail and to the peninsula without any gates to restrict public access to the trails. He went on to review the preliminary utility plan and the project schedule for phased approvals over almost six months, with six to seven public hearings. The next step is the neighborhood input phase with one or two neighborhood meetings. He emphasized that the first phase is purely conceptual, to get staff input to see if there is even a possibility of a project before getting neighborhood input. They would like to get in the ground in 2017. Page 4 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 On a question by Councilmember Junker if the facility will be on the tax roll,Mr.Lazan responded they would likely not be a non-profit, but a for-profit real estate holding. Mayor Kozlowski noted the large volume of emails the City has gotten concerning the project, and recognized that a lot of people are out of town for spring break. Most concerns included people felt like they were not going to be heard, and the other concerns were about traffic, noise, and views. Mr. Lazan responded that part of the next step would be to develop sight line studies and do more analysis as to how visible the facility will be to neighbors. They will be able to digitally show view sheds from all angles in the next phase. Councilmember Polehna reflected that he has heard over and over that it will be a monstrosity showing above the trees, and Mr. Lazan responded that the majority of the trees are 40' tall. City Planner Wittman addressed the traffic concerns and explained that proposed condition #20 involves looking at access acceptable to Washington County, and the potential need for escrow if the City would hire an engineer to conduct a study. Public Works Director Sanders remarked that about 6,000 vehicles use County Road 12 each day, and Mr. Lazan responded that the proposed units would have a low trip count under the average of 10 trips per day for a single family home. Community Development Director Turnblad added that there may be concerns about turning maneuvers to get in and out of traffic on Myrtle, which is why a traffic study will be important. Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing, and suggested to allow the public hearing to continue to the next meeting, since the Council had to reschedule this meeting due to caucuses, and it happens to be spring break. Don Peterson,7130 Mid Oaks Avenue,voiced concerns about the project's impact on water levels on Long Lake. He would like developers to work with the county and watershed district to make sure the system downstream can handle the increased water that will occur during very large storm events. Fritz Knaak, Esq. spoke on behalf of his clients, who are property owners on Long Lake, that agricultural preserve everywhere else means something; the change from that to a high density urban development is enormous. He appreciated willingness to continue the public hearing as requested by residents, so more dialog may occur before this important step. Traci Thompson, 170 Northland, stated she was worried about fertilizer and chemicals that may run into the pond. She also stated the DNR had documented an endangered orchid on the land, and wanted to make sure that is considered. She asked how residents would be notified throughout the process. Mayor Kozlowski suggested that the Council may want to review its notification policies. Public hearing notices are published in the Gazette, but now fewer people subscribe to print media. Community Development Director Turnblad pointed out that residents may ask to have their name on the mailing list, in addition to the normal mailing of notices to those living within 350 feet from a property. Councilmember Weidner added that the City web site has a place where residents may sign up for specific electronic communications. Page 5 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Rebecca Bush, 165 Rutherford Road, told the Council she found out about the proposal at a PTA meeting; she found it interesting that the principal of the school had no idea of the building going next door. The hook up to sewer line will impact the school field, traffic and walking trails. Bradley Bush acknowledged the development corporation has a great reputation. He stated he is all for development and loves the idea of that parcel of land being developed,but feels the project is too large for the area.He does not want City leaders to be so enamored with new income coming into the City that the development has very few strings attached. He urged the Council to keep in mind what is important for the community not just short term, but in the long term. Heidi Proetz Burns, 7190 Mid Oaks, expressed that she does not want the southwest corner of the property developed as she believes it would impact her views. She is not against the development, but is against the change of the neighborhood character. She also asked about the mention of boat docks in the developer's document, and noted there has been a boat that capsized, almost a drowning, and a lot of incidents at the stop sign with near fatalities. She suggested closing 72nd. Mr. Lazan addressed the questions that were brought up,and stated that a Facebook page has been set up to keep the public informed. Developers would not want fertilized areas, they would want the natural areas to remain as they are today. He understands that the DNR has determined there is not an endangered orchid on the site. Developers will work through traffic details. The school district was notified of the proposal; if sewer is brought through ballfields where it was designed and intended to go, they will coordinate with the school. They are fully committed to going through the next steps with four to six public hearings. There would be no further development of the peninsula, other than items that would help residents enjoy that space like perhaps a gazebo. Regarding boat access, he stated this is a conceptual design process. They initially felt it may be nice to have a boat access,but have since considered the sensitivities of the project and now there is no public boat access anticipated. Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim,to continue the public hearing to April 5. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: Councilmember Weidner Case 2016-14 A public hearing to consider a request by Kenneth Heifort, for consideration of a concept Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat, and a Zoning Map Amendment for The Ponds at Heifort Hills, a 24-lot residential subdivision to be located at 8753 and 8911 Neal Avenue North, currently located in the AP Zoning District. PID: 2003020220015. Mayor Kozlowski noted that the applicant requested the item be tabled. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to table Case 2016-14, consideration of a concept Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat, and Zoning Map Amendment for The Ponds at Heifort Hills. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None A public hearing on the adoption of an ordinance extending the corporate limits of Stillwater into certain unincorporated territory that is completely surrounded by the City of Stillwater. City Attorney Magnuson explained that the ordinance corrects a mistake in the legal description. Page 6 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing. There were no public comments.The public hearing was closed. Motion by Councilmember Menikheim, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to approve first reading of an ordinance extending the corporate limits of Stillwater into certain unincorporated territory that is completely surrounded by the City of Stillwater. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None UNFINISHED BUSINESS Possible approval of first reading of ordinance relating toparking vehicles on yard areas City Planner Wittman reviewed the proposed zoning text amendment,with changes suggested by Council at the last Council meeting, including allowed parking in the side yard area if the vehicle is adequately screened, allowable nonconforming driveways to be maintained and replaced in their existing footprint,and permitted gravel parking spaces of a minimum of 6"base in residential areas. Councilmember Polehna asked about the replacement of existing parking pads, and the issue of a take-home vehicle used for business, and City Planner Wittman replied that commercial vehicles are not addressed in the ordinance unless parked on the grass or the front yard. Councilmember Weidner stated he realizes there are arguments that the survey was not adequate, but it indicated that 70% of the respondents felt there should only be parking on developed surfaces; 67% felt parking in the front of a home should be done on a driveway. In addition to the language proposed, it should restrict the length of recreational vehicles. Mayor Kozlowski countered that most problems he heard were about someone parking a giant boat next to a neighbor's garage. Based on the ordinance, if they put gravel down with some edging, those things would be able to stay. He does not think the ordinance as proposed solves those problems. Councilmember Junker recognized that the ordinance is not going to solve every situation. He noticed a home with 22 vehicles parked in the yard,backyard, side yard, and front yard. He is not a big fan of the ordinance, but he would like to see a limit of some type. He feels if a property owner can afford a 36' boat or RV, then they can afford to put it someplace else. Mayor Kozlowski questioned if it is worthwhile to restrict everybody from doing something that only a few people have complaints about, and Councilmember Weidner responded that enforcement would be complaint driven. Councilmember Menikheim recognized that Stillwater is going through some significant growth and development. His constituents have complained about visual blight in some areas. The City needs to present an appearance that it can be proud of Councilmember Weidner agreed with Councilmembers Menikheim and Junker, reiterating that there should be a limit to the length/size and the number of vehicles parked in a yard. He added that there were two people who told him after the last meeting they would not feel comfortable getting up and speaking in favor of the ordinance. Mayor Kozlowski invited the audience to provide public comment. Page 7 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Rob Dombrowsky told the Council he does not feel the proposed ordinance would solve any of the addressed problems; he finds it counterproductive. His parcel is larger than most city lots so he has room to store vehicles,including snowmobiles;to have rules and regulations imposed when he has the extra room is ridiculous. He does not feel the Council should waste any more time, money or personnel energy on the issue. Rob SanCartier provided a petition with 160 signatures stating the proposal is only acceptable if the Council will provide the gravel to park on,because it is expensive.He does not feel the number of vehicles should be limited because he could easily understand the need for 10 vehicles in some families. He feels people are generally against more regulation. A resident stated his property was previously part of Stillwater Township with three acres of land. He feels a lot of the problem has to do with the size of the lot. A one-size-fits-all plan does not solve the problem. City Planner Wittman clarified that the AP district is exempt from the ordinance. Another resident stated that many people have several vehicles to include lawn mowers, 4- wheelers with a plow, and so forth. He feels the number of vehicles should not be limited. Theodore Gillen, 1011 West Myrtle Street, stated he has a 31' motorhome on a concrete parking pad he put in 20 years ago, which conformed to the building code at that time. None of his neighbors think it is objectionable. He urged the Council to keep in mind that case law in Ohio determined it was unconstitutional to enact zoning restrictions for purely aesthetic reasons. Jessica Johnson, 405 Oak Street, stated that a land of tar and concrete is unsightly; pavement, bituminous in particular, pollutes drinking water. She feels government should protect citizens' rights, not limit them. Laws should not be made based on someone's opinion of visual appeal. Mayor Kozlowski closed the public comment period, thanking all for their comments and participation. Councilmember Junker reiterated that the proposed ordinance is not designed for occasions when a homeowner has guests, or if a resident is trying to work on a car in their driveway. The issue is vehicles that are parked in yards indefinitely. Councilmember Menikheim suggested the Council should drop the issue until the problem is better defined. Councilmember Weidner stated he has heard from people saying there is a problem. He is in favor of restricting side yard parking to improved surfaces, limiting it to three vehicles outside the driveway, and limiting the length of vehicles to 31 feet. Motion by Mayor Kozlowski, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to deny approval of the first reading of an ordinance related to parking vehicles on yard areas. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: Councilmembers Weidner and Polehna Possible approval of River City Sculpture Tour for 2016 City Administrator McCarty presented a resolution approving City participation in the Sculpture Tour. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Polehna,to adopt Resolution 2016- 068, approving City participation in 2016 River City Sculpture Tour; approving scope of services Page 8 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 agreement with ArtFarm, LLC; and authorizing a contribution of$1,500 toward the People's Choice Award Sculpture from the Community Beautification Fund. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None Possible approval of Resolution 2016-069, amending Resolution 98-75, Resolution establishing Library Trust Fund City Attorney Magnuson explained that the resolution corrects an error in the record made in 2003. Councilmember Menikheim added that the error involved moving $50,000 from one fund to another that did not get caught until recently. Two Library Board members noticed the mistake. It was corrected administratively. Motion by Councilmember Menikheim, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to adopt Resolution 2016-069, amending Resolution 98-75, Resolution establishing Library Trust Fund. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None NEW BUSINESS Possible approval of final plat and development agreement of Preserve of Stillwater City Planner Wittman stated that the Preserve of Stillwater, formerly known as Richlind, has applied for final plat and development agreement approval. At the time of preliminary plat approval for Richlind, the Council approved several variances associated with the development. The variances were not to take effect until after Final Plat approval. Subsequently the final plat has been filed for the development,though now the plat is known as the Preserve of Stillwater. In addition, the County Surveyor's office has required renumbering of the lots. Consequently, the legal descriptions for the lots that were granted variances are now different. The originally approved resolution needs to be rescinded and replaced with a resolution that includes current legal descriptions. Staff recommends approval with 11 conditions. Motion by Councilmember Menikheim, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to adopt Resolution 2016-070, rescinding and replacing Resolution 2015-046; approving variances for the Preserve of Stillwater, Case No. 2014-39, 13310 Boutwell Road; Resolution 2016-071, approving the final plat for the Preserve of Stillwater; Resolution 2016-072, approving the Development Agreement for the Preserve of Stillwater and approving the first reading of an ordinance amending the Stillwater Zoning Map by rezoning approximately eight acres from AP-Agricultural Preservation. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: Councilmember Weidner Possible approval of plan to separate trail from parking_area south of St. Croix Boat& Packet Office Community Development Director Turnblad stated that St. Croix Boat & Packet leases the City property (former railroad property) south of their office building. The leased area is used principally for parking, but also as dockage for the Andiamo. The City trail constructed last year by MnDOT shares the narrow stretch of land south of the office building. The addition of trail users to the heavy levels of activity generated by St. Croix Boat causes safety concerns. St. Croix Page 9 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Boat & Packet proposes, at their cost, to separate the parking and drive aisle from the trail. The concept plan is to widen the parking area three feet westward and construct a retaining wall. The extra three feet of width will allow for head-in parking, an 8 foot wide drive aisle, and the trail. The drive aisle and trail will be separated by a double yellow line. As a permanent solution, City staff would like to see a vegetated strip, or line of bollards separating the drive aisle from the trail. But, in the interim, the St. Croix Boat & Packet plan represents a viable solution. Staff recommends that the Council approve the concept plan and authorize staff to work with St. Croix Boat& Packet to implement the project. Councilmember Weidner asked if there is a design standard for the wall, adding he would not like to see a cinder block wall. Councilmember Junker commented the offer is great, but he would like to see some type of material other than a versa lock wall. Councilmember Polehna stated he is in favor of the project, but wants the City to approve the materials to be used. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to grant conceptual approval and direct staff to work with St. Croix Boat & Packet and bring design plans back to the Council. Ayes: Councilmembers Menikheim, Junker, Weidner, Polehna, Mayor Kozlowski Nays: None COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS Councilmember Polehna reported that the Beyond Yellow Ribbon Committee meeting is March 28. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Weidner, to adjourn the meeting at 11:43 p.m. All in favor. Ted oz , ATTEST: (1-11aAaL Diane F. Ward, City Clerk Resolution 2016-056, resolution providing for the issuance and sale of$6,505,000 General Obligation Capital Outlay bonds, Series 2016A and levying a tax for the payment thereof Resolution 2016-057, resolution providing for the issuance and sale of$2,450,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding bonds, Series 2016B, and pledging tax increments for the payment thereof Resolution 2016-058, directing the payment of bills Page 10 of 11 City Council Meeting March 22, 2016 Resolution 2016-059, approving the transfer of the Off-Sale Liquor and Tobacco Licenses from CWPHRC Inc., DBA: Stillwater Liquors to Water to Wine LLC, DBA: Stillwater Liquors Resolution 2016-060, approving appointment to Joint Cable Commission Resolution 2016-061, approving plans for County project CSAH 12: CSAH 15 to CSAH 5 Resolution 2016-062, approving a Special Use Permit for Lakeview Hospital to operate a sleep study center at 850 Churchill Street West(Planning Case No. 2016-09) Resolution 2016-063, a resolution approving settlement Resolution 2016-065, approving the expenditure for Big Belly solar trash/recycling compactors Resolution 2016-066, approving contract for professional services related to updating the Downtown Plan Resolution 2016-067, approving contract for design services related to Police Station and City Hall remodeling project Resolution 2016-068, approving City participation in 2016 River City Sculpture Tour; approving scope of services agreement with ArtFarm, LLC; and authorizing a contribution of$1,500 toward the People's Choice Award Sculpture from the Community Beautification Fund Resolution 2016-069, amending Resolution 98-75, Resolution establishing Library Trust Fund Resolution 2016-070, rescinding and replacing Resolution 2015-046 and approving variances for the Preserve of Stillwater, Case No. 2014-39, 13310 Boutwell Road Resolution 2016-071, approving the final plat for the Preserve of Stillwater Resolution 2016-072, approving the Development Agreement for the Preserve of Stillwater Page 11 of 11