HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-09-22 PRC & PC MIN
CITY OF STILLWATER
JOINT MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 22, 2014
Present: Parks Chair Linda Amrein, Parks Commissioners David Brandt, Don Stiff,
Sandy Snellman; Planning Chair Michael Kocon, Planning Commissioners
Sean Hade, Chris Lauer, Anne Siess; Councilmembers Mike Polehna,
Tom Weidner, and Doug Menikheim
Absent: Parks Commissioners Scott Christensen, Rob McGarry, Solveg Peterson;
Planning Commissioners Ryan Collins, Jenna Fletcher, Eric Hansen,
Cameron Kelly, Gim Middleton
Staff present: Community Development Director Bill Turnblad, City Planner Abbi
Wittman, Public Works Superintendent Tim Moore
Others present: Jim Herbert; Michael Jischke, SRF Consulting Group
BARGE TERMINAL PARK PLAN JOINT MEETING
Community Development Director Turnblad described the property being discussed:
several thousand feet of shoreline and a narrow strip of property that was once used for
railroad and industrial uses. Several things warrant a plan update at this time: 1) the
new river crossing is underway and MnDOT is constructing a loop trail as part of the
mitigation package, with two trail segments that traverse this property; 2) the City
acquired historic buildings that will be reused in some way; 3) the DNR may install a
public boat access at the south end of the site. SRF Consulting, in conjunction with
Baird & Associates, has been working on the plan. Meetings have occurred with various
stakeholders. The Commissions will look at conceptual layouts tonight.
Michael Jischke, SRF Consulting Group, discussed the planning process, timelines, and
the current state of the shoreline. Planning must be cognizant of flooding, stormwater
runoff, stormwater treatment basins developed by MnDOT and existing vegetation. He
showed the boundaries of the cultural landscape district and archeological district which
includes almost all the barge terminal property. The parcel is 20 acres; 250 feet at its
widest, 3600 feet long (over 1/2 mile). He pointed out the preferred boat launch location
near the north end where the two Bergstein buildings are.
Planning Commission Chairman Kocon pointed out there are at least four dock/launch
locations. He asked why the two closest to downtown were not preferred.
Mr. Jischke responded that the launch areas closer to downtown were not preferred
locations due to potential for flooding and visual impact on Lowell Park. He went on to
present a lower intensity concept and a higher intensity concept for the site. He
Joint Parks and Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 2014
presented a photo illustrating some challenges at the north end of site where there is
probably only room for one way vehicle access. There also needs to be some parking
provided on the site.
Councilmember Weidner asked about the delineation between St. Croix Boat and
Packet property and the City’s property.
Community Development Director Turnblad explained what St. Croix Boat and Packet
owns and what that company leases from the City.
Mr. Jischke stated there were a couple concepts developed for a boat launch at the
south end of the site. The existing publicly accessible spaces near the Andiamo are
hard to see, so it is felt that a new dock is warranted. There are many traditional park
uses that would be appropriate, as well as some interpretive elements and the
opportunity to have performing arts such as Shakespeare in the Park or a temporary
tent for a concert. The concept of “natural play” areas could be incorporated. There may
be opportunities for vendors in the park as well.
Planning Commission Chairman Kocon noted it would be nice to be able to kayak or
canoe into Stillwater and dock somewhere other than the marina. It wouldn’t even
require docks, just a rack. He asked if that would be feasible.
Mr. Jischke responded that non-motorized watercraft should definitely be considered.
Councilmember Polehna pointed out the Aiple property north of downtown is intended to
be a more natural area - that may be a possibility for kayaks and canoes.
Parks Commission Chair Amrein agreed she would like to see a non-motorized
watercraft area.
Community Development Director Turnblad added that the reuse study for the two
Bergstein buildings will be done later this fall; they could be used to rent kayaks or
canoes.
Parks Commission Chair Amrein noted the Parks Commission has discussed potential
use of the historic buildings for interpretative exhibits, bathrooms, and putting a vendor
there to sell beverages.
Councilmember Weidner remarked he has heard boaters are hesitant to tie up on the
levee wall because of the damage caused by wakes. Could the City consider a no-wake
zone, rather than building more docks?
Community Development Director Turnblad responded that the wake/no-wake issue is
intensely debated by the boating community. It might be possible to encourage
temporary dockage along the wall but it may not be a substitute for a dedicated dock.
Page 2 of 4
Joint Parks and Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 2014
Mr. Jischke presented a scenario that includes a transient linear dock to accommodate
different size watercraft pulling up.
Councilmember Weidner asked if there was a study done to determine how many boats
need access?
Planning Commissioner Siess remarked that in one of the plans there are five trailer
parking spots and in the other plan there are 15. These are small numbers considering
the current demand.
Mr. Jischke replied that the footprint of the parking lot is limited by the terrain. It is the
size lot that MnDOT proposed.
Community Development Director Turnblad added that the size of the parking lot to
support the launch is based on available space - the property is narrow and there are
other uses such as a lift station and other things that can’t be moved. Even in the more
intense scenario, the DNR could find a maximum space for approximately 16 boats.
Regarding the analysis of the need, the consulting group talked with almost every
marina down to Prescott asking about the need for transient slips and was told there is
a need for more transient boat docking in Stillwater.
Mr. Jischke explained the higher intensity scenario would include a bigger parking area
adjacent to the boat launch, possibly a multipurpose shelter, and possibly a pedestrian
promenade to connect with Lowell Park. This would be a more urban style riverfront.
Parks Commission Chair Amrein asked about locations for fishing from shore.
Councilmember Polehna remarked that LaCrosse has bump-outs along the promenade
for people to sit or fish.
Community Development Director Turnblad noted fishing may not be compatible near
St. Croix Boat & Packet. There is a fishing pier proposed for the barge terminal property
and one planned for the Aiple property north of downtown.
Planning Commission Chairman Kocon suggested that the Kolliner property across the
river may be a better location for a boat dock because it’s sheltered from the current.
Mr. Jischke confirmed there is potential for a dock there.
Community Development Director Turnblad added there was also discussion, if money
were not an issue, about having non-motorized watercraft in the protected bay, and
motorized watercraft south of the Andiamo. The reason the team didn’t consider using
the Wisconsin side for the primary dock location is that Wisconsin DNR and WisDOT
would be involved, and it would take more lobbying effort and advocacy. In Minnesota,
the City has jurisdiction and control of the property. Kolliner Park is intended for trails
and passive use.
Page 3 of 4
Joint Parks and Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 2014
Councilmember Polehna asked about the rules for clearing brush, buckthorn, locust and
boxelder.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied tree removal and clearing must be
approved by the DNR.
Councilmember Weidner asked about old foundations on the site.
City Planner Wittman replied the City is seeking grants for stabilizing soils. She showed
photos of some of the existing archeological resources.
Planning Commissioner Lauer asked about moving the Welcome to Stillwater sign.
Community Development Director Turnblad responded that the mitigation plan for the
bridge includes a place for a welcome sign.
Councilmember Weidner asked how the Parks Commission prioritizes projects based
on budgeting.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied that they come up with a preferred
concept, then staff puts together an estimate of costs, then it goes into the capital
improvement program which goes before the Council for decision making. Over time,
funds are earmarked for certain kinds of improvements. The nice thing about this plan is
that the capital for some of the features comes out of other budgets.
Public Works Superintendent Moore added that over the last three years, staff has
brought the capital improvement working list before the Parks Commission for
discussion. Staff tries to follow this list as much as possible. The barge terminal park
project is not on that working list.
City Planner Wittman added that many of the features in this project will be funded by
outside sources like state grants.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied the timing depends on the
community and the Council’s priorities. As funds are identified, certain elements of the
plan can be completed. A key part of any plan is an implementation schedule. Planning
is sometimes very long term. He encouraged the commissioners to send staff
comments, questions and suggestions. There will be an open house scheduled in about
a month.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Kink
Recording Secretary
Page 4 of 4