Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-08-03 HPC Packeti 1 1 ater 1NE OIRTNELACE OF MIMNESOTA AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North August 3, 2015 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of July 6, 2015 regular meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 1. Case No. 2015-32: Design Review for hanging business sign with black decorative bracket. Located at 112 Main St S. Mike Lynskey, Owner. Gina Kazmersik, Applicant. 2. Case No. 2015-33: Design Review for replacement of black vinyl roof with white. Located at 333 Main St N. Mark Desch, Owner. 3. Case No. 2015-38: Design Review for addition of ground mounted transformer and new roof top HVAC unit. Located at 1950 Curve Crest Blvd. Thomas Rieser, Owner. Darrick Mack, Applicant. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS - The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item. 4. Case No. 2015-35: Design Review request for 952 sq. foot garage and 682 sq. foot Accessory Dwelling Unit. Located at 1343 1st St S. Lowell Schmoeckel, Owner. VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Case No. 2015-31: Demolition Review for consideration of a partial demolition of additions to the Connelly Shoe Factory, a contributing building in the Commercial Historic District. Located at 123 Second St N. Judd Sather, Owner VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Case No. 2015-34: Design Review request for tenant signage. Located at 216 Myrtle St W. Robert Eiselt, Owner 2. Case No. 2015-37: Design Review request for Accessory Dwelling Unit. Located at 119 Chestnut St W. Roger Tomten, Applicant, Jeff Anderson, Owner. IX. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION X. ADJOURNMENT i I \v ate': THE OIRTNPLACE OF MINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING July 6, 2015 7:00 P.M. Chairman Larson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present: Chairman Larson, Commissioners Goodman, Johnson, Mino, Welty, Council Representative Menikheim Absent: Commissioners Branjord and Krakowski Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of June 1, 2015 meeting minutes Commissioner Welty requested that the minutes reflect that for Case No. 2015-24, the light pole and text should be graphically separated from one another. Motion by Commissioner Welty, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to approve the minutes of the June 1, 2015 meeting as amended. All in favor, 5-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2015-28 Design Review for replacement of hotel signage for new Grandstay Hotel, located at 2200 Frontage Road West. Tim Olson, applicant. Commissioner Johnson observed that the sign is already up on the pylon. City Planner Wittman replied the owners had asked staff to grant temporary approval of the signage so it could be in place for a grand reopening of the structure. Motion by Commissioner Welty, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor, 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2015-29 Design Review for construction of a detached garage and accessory dwelling unit located at 912 5th Street South. Eileen Gibson and Larry Wheeler, owners. City Planner Wittman explained the request. The applicants wish to construct a detached garage with accessory dwelling unit. Modifications to the existing structure also are proposed; however, they are not a part of the HPC review. The Special Use Permit will be before the Planning Commission on Wednesday. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 6, 2015 Chairman Larson opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Wheeler explained that a scissor truss design will be used with an energy heel on the truss. Commissioner Johnson complimented Mr. Wheeler on the submission. Mr. Wheeler said he has designed many homes throughout the metro area. Chairman Larson asked if a deck is intended for the rear elevation. Mr. Wheeler confirmed there will be a small deck there, around 10' x 12'. Commissioner Johnson reminded Mr. Wheeler about setback requirements for the deck. Commissioner Welty asked about the front elevation - is it a false railing over the utility door? Mr. Wheeler replied he wants to put a standing seam metal roof on the small entryway. Commissioner Johnson remarked that he would like to see the window sills treated similar to those on the original home, with framing across the top and sides, and a narrower sill at the bottom. Mr. Wheeler replied he wants the details to be right. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairman Larson, to approve the Design Permit for Case No. 2015-29, a detached garage and accessory dwelling unit located at 912 5th Street South, with the following conditions: 1) Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department on June 16, 2015 and shall be valid for the garage and accessory dwelling unit only. 2) The materials and colors shall be consistent with the primary residence. 3) A building permit shall be obtained prior to construction. 4) Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5) Window sills shall be architecturally treated to be consistent with the window sill form of the primary residence. 6) A deck or set of stairs and appropriate railing shall be completed on the dwelling. 7) All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. All in favor, 5-0. Commissioner Johnson pointed out the HPC approval deals only with the garage and accessory dwelling unit, not the home itself. Case No. 2015-30 Design Review for construction of a new two-story home with detached tandem car garage, located at 514 St. Croix Avenue West. Jeremy and Sara Imhoff, owners. City Planner Wittman reviewed the application. The applicants wish to construct a single family residence on a vacant lot. Because the property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District, an infill design review permit is required for the new home. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Ms. Imhoff explained the front porch wraps around and they wanted a connection between the front and back yard. They want a garden/sitting area in between to provide a buffer with the neighbors. Commissioner Welty asked if they considered putting windows on the garage, to break up the long wall. Ms. Imhoff replied they considered adding windows, but decided not to because of cost. They have about 18" of garage storage along that wall. They could plant some trees along the side of the garage if that would help. They felt the long garage wall would function as sort of a backyard fence. They have discussed their plans Page 2 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 6, 2015 with their neighbor to the west. City Planner Wittman added that she spoke with that neighbor months ago and he has been very actively keeping up with what was happening on this vacant lot. Chairman Larson opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Johnson commented as far as four sided architecture, it is consistent without windows on the east or west. Some vines or vertical plantings may be more appealing to the neighbor. Commissioner Mino asked about the roof material. Ms. Imhoff replied they would like a standing seam metal roof, to give a modern farmhouse feel. Commissioner Johnson noted the more vertical house and the somewhat over -scaled windows reflect the older houses in the neighborhood, but with a contemporary exaggerated feel. It fits into the neighborhood well. Chairman Larson agreed. He likes the contemporary take on historic massing and detail. Motion by Chairman Larson, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve the Design Permit for Case No. 2015- 30, a new two-story home with detached tandem car garage, located at 514 St. Croix Avenue West, with the following conditions: 1) Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department on June 19, 2015. 2) A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 3) Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4) All minor modifications shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. All in favor, 5-0. Case No. 2015-31 Demolition Review for consideration of a partial demolition of additions to the Connolly Shoe Factory, a contributing building in the Commercial Historic District, located at 123 Second Street North. Judd Sather, owner. City Planner Wittman reported that the applicant is requesting approval to demolish an addition to the Connolly Shoe Factory, a Nationally Registered Historic Commercial contributing building. The addition consists of two originally separate structures built between 1906 and 1956 which supported the shoe factory. The older of the two structures was used as an oil house. The newer, smaller structure was constructed between the oil house and the primary structure. This building, which was turned into the oil house, was connected to the leather -findings shop by a single doorway. Demolition is requested to accommodate electrical requirements for mixed use proposed for the main building. The applicant has conditional approval of a Special Use Permit for an events venue on the upper story. Mixed office/practitioner space is planned for the second level and a restaurant space is planned on the lower level. In order to achieve the higher -intensity, multi -use of the building, the owner will need to install a new transformer on the site, new air conditioner units for the separate floors, and lease spaces as well as have a location for enclosed waste receptacles. Staff recommends approval of the demolition permit for the oil house with conditions, and denial of the demolition permit for the leather -findings warehouse. Chairman Larson applauded the applicant on the plans for reuse of the main building. Mr. Sather explained that to partially demolish and then rebuild part of the structure seemed like a waste. The 30" minimum requirement for the transformer was something he had not heard before. The electrical engineer and architect determined where the electrical and air conditioning units should go. One of the conditions of the SUP is that the trash cannot be outside. Currently it is outside in an ugly area with a chain link fence. Behind the dumpsters is an artesian well. It would be difficult to keep the fragile tile wall in tact while demolishing something right next to it. Page 3 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 6, 2015 Commissioner Johnson suggested the southerly building could be used to store trash. Mr. Sather replied they are building a trash room inside the building and will wheel it out into the alley. Chairman Larson said he had difficulty with the fact that the application doesn't include plans for the trash enclosure - materials, design, size, or whether there is a roof on it. Mr. Sather replied it probably will not have a roof. There will be a trash enclosure and a transformer on a pad. Commissioner Johnson noted they might be able to put the condenser units on the roof of the southerly building if necessary. Commissioner Welty asked if the well could be rerouted to circulate through the sunken garden. City Planner Wittman replied it would have to travel across a third -party property before getting to the garden - the City probably would not be interested in that. The applicant anticipates a brewer possibly using that water. Chairman Larson opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Councilmember Menikheim said architect Mark Balay informed him the applicant has been talking with Xcel Energy for months. What is proposed is necessary in order for the use to happen. Personally, he does not know what would be gained by saving the building. It has very little historical value. Maybe the Commission should table it until the new area is re -designed. Chairman Larson reiterated it's reasonable to want to know what the trash enclosure will look like. That is missing from the application. Commissioner Welty said she would rather see an alley that has solid built up structures. To leave a gap and not know what the gap is going to look like is less of a sure thing than having the tile building there. Commissioner Johnson stated the Commission's charge is to look at demolitions only when there is no feasible alternative to demolition. The visual appeal or lack of it is beside the point. He would have a hard time approving the demolition of both structures because the southerly one was very closely associated in the time of construction and use of the original building and it is pretty much in its original condition. Commissioner Goodman noted that preservation would involve approximately 25% of the original facade of the alley -facing side. Chairman Larson suggested the Commission should table it because 1) it has to be clear that maintaining the building is not feasible - the Commission needs to ask the applicant to demonstrate with diagrams why it's not feasible to maintain that building; and 2) it needs to be clear as to what would be in its place - materials, elevations, height and design. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to approve the demolition permit for the oil house, as depicted on the 1924-1956 Sanborn maps, and with necessary attachments to the primary structure located at 123 Second Street South with the following conditions: 1) The applicant shall provide 20 amp electrical service to the City of Stillwater for the water pump located at the Sunken Gardens a contributing historic site in the Commercial Historic District, located adjacent to the building. 2) Documentation shall be provided of the exterior drain flows. In the event the drain is connected to the municipal sanitary system, the drain shall be disconnected and connected to the building. Documentation of the disconnection shall be provided. Connection to the municipal storm sewer system is encouraged to address stormwater drainage in this location. Page 4 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 6, 2015 3) Documentation, according to the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) standards, of the interior and exterior dimensions and conditions, including heights, width, and materials, shall be submitted to the HPC and kept on file as a portion of the historical and architectural inventory for all portions of structures approved for demolition. Documentation shall be submitted prior to the release of a demolition permit by the Building Official. 4) The HPC will continue the discussion of the demolition permit for the leather -findings clay tile warehouse, as depicted on the 1924-1956 Sanborn Map and noted as the oil house on the 1910 Sanborn Map to explore other feasible alternatives including, but not limited to, equipment layout and screening, enclosure materials and all other site improvements. All in favor, 5-0. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2015-27 Design Review to reface front office portion of building and create front entry door, located at 1792 Greeley Street South. Randy Jennssen, owner. City Planner Wittman stated the applicant is requesting a Design Permit for a proposed addition and upgrade to portions of the exterior facade which include: 1) installation of a 14' x 6' portico on the front (east) facade; 2) a stone veneer to be placed on the bottom of the existing front facade and wrap around 2' on the north and along the south facade of the structure's addition; 3) new lap siding to be placed above the stone veneer; 4) a new cedar pergola and patio area to be constructed on the south end of the structure's addition, filling in a portion of open space at the southeast corner of the structure; 5) three new tempered glass picture windows to be installed on the east and north sides of the existing addition. The proposal would reduce the non -conformity of the existing concrete block and dress up the entrance. No lighting plan was submitted. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Applicant Randy Jennssen and his partner Greg Johnson provided color selections for the roofing, trim, siding and stone. The space will be used as a remodelers' showroom. The warehouse portion will be leased out. They have no plans to change that portion of the building. Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to approve the Design Permit for Case No. 2015-27, refacing of front office portion of building and creation of new front entry door located at 1792 Greeley Street South, with the following conditions: 1) The stone veneer shall be extended along the north facade up to the point of the concrete block facade and consistent with the lap siding extension. 2) The installation of new lighting shall be directed down and shielded from adjacent properties or roadways. All lights shall be contained on the property. 3) A total of 204 square feet of new landscaped area shall be created onsite. Landscaping shall be a combination of trees, shrubs, flower and ground cover. 4) In the event the Community Development Director determines substantial alterations are proposed for future phases of facade renovation, staff shall bring the proposed modifications before the HPC for design review. 5) Color palette and materials shall be consistent with those submitted at the July 6, 2015 HPC meeting. All in favor, 5-0. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION Preservation Training Opportunities Page 5 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 6, 2015 City Planner Wittman mentioned two training opportunities and asked Commissioners to let her know soon if they wish to attend so she can seek out grants and scholarships: the Annual State Preservation Conference, September 17-18, 2015, Little Falls, MN; and the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions Forum, July 27-31, 2016, Mobile, AL. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Goodman, seconded by Chairman Larson, to adjourn. All in favor, 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:48 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink Recording Secretary Page 6 of 6 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-32 APPLICANT: Image360 representing Tamarack Gallery & Framing REQUEST: Consideration of approval of a Design Permit of an unlit, projecting sign and black metal bracket to be located at 112 Main Street South ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit to install a five square foot projecting sign and bracket to the structure located at 112 Main Street South. The black metal sign will read 'Tamarack Galley & Framing' in white letters. It will be framed in wood. The sign is not proposed to be lit. It will be the only wall mounted signage associated with this business. All existing window signage is in conformance with the City Sign Regulations as well as the Downtown Design Manual guidelines. Proposed projecting sign bracket location The sign will hang from a decorative metal bracket, projecting approximately 30" from the structure. The bracket will be located in the wood framing between the center and northern transom windows, above the main storefront. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Projecting signs are permitted by the sign ordinance to be no greater than six square feet and as to not pose a hazard to sidewalk users. Additionally, if lit, it may not be internal. Municipal Code Section 31-209, Design permit states: ■ The Standards for Review , Sec. 31-509(f) indicates the HPC shall utilize the following standards: o Architectural character: ■ The suitability of the building for the intended purpose. ■ The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines. ■ The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development. o Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development. o Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources. o Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following (abbreviated) guidelines: ■ Only one sign that contains the business name or graphic logo ... window sign may be used in addition to other sign types. ■ Signage should be located in such a way as to not obscure any architectural features. ■ Use painted wood where practicable. ■ Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. ■ The storefront sign should be used to display the primarily name of the business only. ■ Support brackets of projecting signs should be black. FINDINGS As the application demonstrates, the appearance of the projecting sign will be consistent with the Downtown Design Review Manual guidelines and in harmony with the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of HPC Case No. 2015-32 with the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be installed so that a minimum of 7' of clearance is maintained between the sidewalk grade and the bottom of the projecting sign. 2. Disturbance to the wood framing shall be done in a fashion as to prevent excess damage and future water intrusion. 3. Lighting for signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission prior to installation. 4. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Application Proposed Details (2 pages) 112 Main Street South HPC 2015-32 (8/3/2015) Page 2 of 2 30" wide 0 Tamarack Gallery & Framing Please check that the following are accurate before approving your job: ❑ Copy/Text in Job ❑ Phone Number(s) ❑ E-Mail Address(es) ❑ Colors (CMYK or PMS) ❑ Sizing of Text/Graphics ❑ Overall Size of the Sign, Graphic, Etc. ❑ Placement of Graphic Provided on Mockup (if applicable) ❑ Address(es) ❑ Website ❑ Logo(s) ❑ License #'s ❑ image(s) ❑ Font ❑ Spacing Send Changes/Approval to: Email Changes: rachelgdmage360woodbury.com Fax Changes: 651-444-8112 ❑ Approved WITHOUT any corrections. ❑ Approved WITH CORRECTIONS indicated. ❑ Make changes marked & show corrected proof. NOTE: File formats that do not meet our print requirements cannot be guaranteed for print clarity. Colors in proof may not reflect printed job. Job Proof may not be scaled to size. Signature: Date. By signing above, you agree that you have checked over all items listed above and approve the job based on this proof. Any changes made after this signed approval may be subject to additional charge. Customer Tamarack Gallery & Framing 112 Main Street South • Stillwater, MN 55082 Lill Linder • 612-363-3422 lilllinder9255Cagmail.com Sign/Graphic Details Overall Size: 30" wide by 24" tall OTY 1 • Double Sided Cal digi vinyl with BL UV Gloss overlam Mounted to Max Metal Image360 - Woodbury 650 Commerce Drive • Suite 160 Woodbury, MN 55125 • 651.444.8111 info@image360woodbury.com www.image360woodbury.com DAB Decorum! Hanging &eau MAMA, up to 40° HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-33 APPLICANT: Mark Desch, property owner REQUEST: Consideration of approval of a Design Permit for the replacement of a vinyl roof on the structure located at 333 Main Street North ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit to replace an existing, black vinyl roof. The new roof is proposed to be white. The property owner has indicated a white vinyl roof, found on other buildings downtown, is required for energy efficiency. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Municipal Code Section 31-209, Design permit states: ■ The Standards for Review , Sec. 31-509(f) indicates the HPC shall utilize the following standards: o Architectural character: ■ The suitability of the building for the intended purpose. ■ The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines. ■ The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development. o Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources. o Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following (abbreviated) guidelines: • Roofs: The predominant roof shape in the commercial core is flat (slightly sloped to drain) • Materials: Any infill building and facade should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades • Materials: buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatible with the general area. • Color: The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect. • Color: Avoid colors which visually overpower or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established downtown color schemes as a whole. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS While traditionally determined to be maintenance, the replacement of vinyl roofs does not require a Design Permit. However, white roofs have been discussed as not suitable in the Downtown Design Review District due to their potentially negative impact to historic views and vistas along the top of the downtown blufflines. As depicted to the right, numerous white roofs exist in the downtown area, including on buildings designated as District. contributing to the Stillwater Commercial Historic As the application demonstrates, the white vinyl roof will be consistent with the Downtown Design Review Manual guidelines and in general harmony with the adjacent Stillwater Commercial Historic District. Furthermore the application fulfills the purpose of the City Zoning Code and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of HPC Case No. 2015-33 with the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be reviewed and approved prior to the installation of the new roof. 2. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Application Photos (3 pages) 112 Main Street South HPC 2015-32 (8/3/2015) Page 2 of 2 iUwater H E KIWTHPIACE OF MINNESOTA. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-38 APPLICANT: Darrick Mach, Plan Force Group, representing Thomas V. Rieser, owner REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for the installation of a single ground mounted emergency generator and a roof top HVAC unit to be located on the property at 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard ZONING: BPI - Business Park Industrial COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Commercial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Design Permit for the installation of mechanical equipment to be utilized for the structure located at 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard, a property located in the West Stillwater Business Park District. The request includes: ■ A new rooftop HVAC unit to be located approximately 40' from the front and 25' from the western side of the structure's facade. The rooftop unit is proposed to be screened within a brick panel enclosure to match the existing building's design. • A new ground -mounted, emergency generator to be located near the northeast .Iu-- Iht1,,+, corner of the structure. The self-contained unit is proposed to be screened by five new 36" in height arborvitae shrubs, consistent with the screening of the existing low -profile, ground mounted mechanical equipment in this location. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS The intent of the design review procedure is to secure the general purposes of the comprehensive plan, West Stillwater Business Park Plan, to maintain the character and integrity of neighborhoods and commercial districts by promoting excellence of design and development, preventing traffic hazards, providing adequate services and encouraging development in harmony with its neighborhood or planning area. The applicable standards of the design review are as follows: (1) Architectural character: i. The suitability of the building for the intended purpose. ii. The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines. iii. The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development. (2) Landscaping: i. The location, height and material of walls, fences, hedges, trees and screen plantings to ensure harmony with adjacent development or to conceal areas, utility installations or other unsightly development. ii. The planting ... to prevent dust and erosion. iii. The preservation of healthy mature trees. iv. Usable open space in terms of quantity and quality of landscaping. (3) Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. Design guidelines have been developed for the West Stillwater Business District to ensure consistent quality design. The following guidelines will be used: • All roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash storage areas shall be completely enclosed with building material compatible with the principle structure. Low profile self-contained mechanical units which blend in with the building design located to the side or rear of the building may be permitted. • All new trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from a growing site with a tree spade and be a 2-1/2 inch caliber for deciduous trees, 6 foot in height for evergreens and 1-1/2 inch caliber for ornamental trees. ANLYSIS AND FINDINGS As the application demonstrates, the location of the proposed improvements and the proposed screening is consistent with the guidelines set forth in the West Stillwater Business Park District plan. Furthermore the application fulfills the purpose of the City Zoning Code and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of HPC Case No. 2015-38 based on the following conditions: 1. All necessary electrical and building permits shall be required prior to the installation of the HVAC unit and ground -mounted transformer. 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard Case No. 2015-38 (HPC 8/3/2015) Page 2 2. The rooftop HVAC equipment shall be screening with the brick panel design in a color complimentary and compatible with the existing facade colors. 3. The vegetative screening shall be down with quality nursery stock that is, at a minimum, 1- 1/ 2 inch caliber. 4. In the event the Community Development Director determine substantial alterations are proposed for the construction of these improvements, staff shall bring the proposed modifications before the HPC for design review. ATTACHMENTS Applicant Narrative (2 pages) Site Plan and Generator Details HVAC Screening Details 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard Case No. 2015-38 (HPC 8/3/2015) Page 3 Date: July 17, 2015 To: City of Stillwater, Planning Department c/o: Abbi Wittman, City Planner For: Heritage Preservation Commission Design Review Application Address: 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard Comprehensive Guide: West Business Park Design Review District Zoning Classification: BPI (Business Park Industrial) Project: Advance Pain Management remodel PLAN FORCE COMMERCIAL INTERIORS PlanForce Commercial Interiors, on behalf of WSM Architects and Advanced Pain Management (APM), is requesting review by the Heritage Preservation Commission for the screening of a new mechanical roof top unit and landscape screening of a new emergency generator located on the north (rear yard) of the above noted site. APM is in the process of proposing a remodel to an existing Medical Advanced Pain Specialists (MAPS) suite for their future use. As part of this remodel, they require the services of a new roof top unit and emergency back-up generator. As noted in the West Stillwater Business Park Plan (Dec. 1989), roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment is required to have a review by the Commission to ensure consistent quality design. The installation location for the new roof top unit will be in the southwestern quadrant of the existing roof structure and is located over an existing building column. This location will provide structural support for the weight of the equipment, and is approximately 28' east and 40' north of the existing roof parapets. APM proposes screening with a unit -supported screen device called "Envisor" by Cityscapes. It has a variety of panel styles and heights and they are proposing the 'brick' style panel to complement the existing brickwork on the building, A 56" high panel would be used to conceal the unit and limit unit visibility from the ground. Please see the attached product brochure and Section 4/L1.2 for a better look at the system. The proposed installation location for the new ground mounted emergency generator is directly north of the building approximately 36'-0" from the north facade. This location maintains required clearances from an existing ground mounted transformer and hvac chiller, will allow ease of equipment maintenance in the future, however it is located in the area of a required property line setback. The generator itself will have a weather-proof enclosure and will look consistent with the other equipment in the area. The Power of Interior Design Page 1 1 PLANFORCE 4931 West 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952.512.9547 PlanForceGroup.com APM's understanding from the City Planner, Abbi Wittman, is that equipment has been allowed in the setback zone provided it has adequate screening. The existing low profile self-contained units in this area are currently using arborvitae trees to screen from the east and north adjacent properties. The building screens them from the south. APM proposes to provide new arborvitae in a quantity, height and width that will provide the same level of screening when reaching full growth. See 1/L1.1 for proposed location of the new low profile self-contained generator unit. The existing building and grounds will have little impact from the installation of the new roof top unit and generator. The neighboring sites of this subject property are all zoned as BPI Business Park Industrial and operate as office uses. Therefore, these improvements will not be creating a situation which impinges upon a residential zone or dissimilar use within the neighborhood. APM intends to conform to existing landscape screening being provided and provide roof top screening that blends in with the surroundings. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. We look forward to any further discussions and commentary on this project. Sincerely, Darrick Mack PlanForce Commercial Interiors Attachments: 30x42 L1.1 and L1.2 Plans, "Envisor" Brochure, RTU and Generator Info Sheets. The Power of Interior Design Page 1 2 PLANFORCE 4931 West 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952.512.9547 PlanForceGroup.com ELEVATION NEW GENERATOR LOCATION (PHOTO 1: EXISTING SCREENING AT MECHANICAL UNITS SCALE: 1 LI/ =1'-0' (PHOTO 2: LOOKING TOWARD PROPOSED GENERATOR LOCATION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I r - - I EASING __ I PARKING LOT - I I I _ I - _ I _—I I I I � SITE PLAN L PARK(= LOT EXISTING ORI VE-UP EXISTING CANOPY ROOF EXISTING PARKING LOT EXISTING GILDING " 1 Nu m m[°sc [Erv. 0,40111.1.1140. \ EXISTING PARKING LOT EINEFHT- CURVE CREST BLVD I 1 I I I I I I I 7 1I 1 I I I 1 I I OVERALL SITE SCALE: 1/16" =1-0'. PLAN 1 ARCHITECTS LLJ 0 0 Cl- _ w N LLJ j 0 J i N U yc I HEitE9T aRTIFV TNAi 1HIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER Mr DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DM LICENSED HRECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF [WNW.. MINNESOTA. SIGNATURE: LICENSE Y g'°11PC,0„ION P.E 07/1„ 1, 1,011 0,1615 /01201200520,100,1 SITE PLAN A°o� L 1.1 311PE. nimie 1111 1111 111111 1 0 ELEVATION SEEL zrz rzz ELEVATION EAST BUILDING FACADE ELEVATION 0.1111PrIliifill, P.111,11 4o fi I your oar& oat,. t7.4474—.447;4:;4=444744774;o 'EXAMPLE OF RTU SCREENING Seep ....Ado to4 o rood °amigo EXAMPLE OF RTU SCREEN STYLES — L4 SECTION THRU BUILDING TO NEW RTU /NEW RTU TO BE LOCATED ABOUT HEREV 'PHOTO: VIEW TOWARD EAST FROM PARKING Li IPHOTO. VIEW TOWARD BUILDING FROM ENTRY DRIVE SCALE. SCALE. 3/16 —1 -0'' EFLaL.E. SCALE: 1 41.' PLAN 0.1 I"' INN ARCHITECTS 7I-I'MilVt"D'RTIF;VIZTeTHIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT W. PREPARED BY ATE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TH, I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, SIGNATURE: LICENSE It REVISION, PPCSIIIMPPSION PACKAGE 0,17/1.5 CIPPCMPO PASW OniE 0,1615 PLOP DAM ,17/20552:1611 PM SPEEPPLE SITE PLAN .L.1 TOP OF ROOF 52" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR FOOTPRINT M ` ( will.1004) OM) ir 391 ' UNIT 39ii" 52" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR ELEVATION CURB - 391}. UNIT 394. OUTSIDE DIMENSION 52" VERTICAL STYLE ENVISOR SECTION NOTE: The Screen System shown corresponds to a typical construction of the Envisor 52 Vertical Style using Flat Rib Panels. This drawing is intended to illustrate general dimensions of the Envisor System when installed on an average Roof Top Unit. Dimensions and specifications of the system can vary depending on the RTU's location to each other and performance characteristics. c(tyscapos architectural innovations 4200 LYMAN COURT HILLIARD, OH (614) 850-2549 THIS IS AN ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED DRAWING SUBMITTED FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE IN CONNECTION WNH A PROJECT BEING PLANNED FOR YOU BY CNYSCAPES INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED R IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, IXHIBRED, OR FABRICATED IN ANY FASHION WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM AN AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF THE COMPANY. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ENVISOR 52" VERTICAL STYLE REVISION REF.# AND DATE SCALE 3/16" = 1' PROJECT DESCRIPTION GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS CLIENT CONTACT PERSON WORK ORDER # PAS 02/05/04 SHEET OF 1 DRAWN BY PAS CHECKED BY ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP JOBSITE LOCATION DATE FILE CREATED 02/05/04 DWG FILE # 100039 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP J:\1 00039\1 00039 \MTH NO TOP TRIM.dwg, 1 1 /24/201 4 4:1 1 :26 PM, NCONDO HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-35 APPLICANT: Lowell Schmoeckel, applicant REQUEST: Design Review of a future Accessory Dwelling Unit to be located at 1343 1st Street South ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST AND BACKGOUND The applicant has submitted a Design Permit application for a proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) to be constructed at 1343 1st Street South, a residential lot located in the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) which contains a single family home. Though an application has been received, the applicant has not received a Special Use Permit (SUP) and associated variances required by the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION Section 31-501, Subd. 3(7) indicates the application requires design review for consistency with the primary unit in design, detailing and materials. Although the property is located within the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD), the property is not subject to the NCD Guidelines as it is not new infill development on a vacant parcel. City Code Section 31-209 indicates the applicable standards for review of a Design Permit application are: • Architectural character: o The suitability of the building for the intended purpose. o The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines. o The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development. • Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources. • Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. As no established guidelines exist for the construction of ADUs, The following guidelines can help assist the HPC in determining compliance with the guidelines as well as design consistency, detailing and materials with the primary unit. Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. The proposed 2-story ADU will be located on the same property a two-story story home. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The new garage and ADU will be set back from the road further than the required setback of 30' as well as back from the prevailing front yard for houses in this neighborhood. This is consistent with the guidelines for detached garages. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. The roof form, a low-pitched hip, is consistent with that of the primary structure. The proposed height of the structure is 22' which is less than the height of the primary structure. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. The lot if relatively flat and no trees are proposed to be removed. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. Respect the site's natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and retaining walls. The lot is relatively flat. No retaining walls are proposed. Building Site Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. As indicated, the garage and ADU will be situated back from the front property line. The applicant is proposing a 7.5+/- rear yard setback which will necessitate a variance. Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front. As the garage will be set back from the street, the garages on the street will be reduced. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. The footprint of the structure is less than the footprint of the primary structure, after alterations are made. 1343 1st Street South HPC: 8/3/2015 Page 2 of 4 Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. No front porch is proposed for the garage and ADU. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. The garage and ADU will be sided in like materials as the primary structure. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. This guideline has been met. Architectural Detail The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. Most of the residences within close proximity are simple in design and construction, with minimal detailing. The new garage and ADU will be consistent in style. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. The property owner is proposing proportional window and door openings to the size of the structure on the front of the garage. Windows on the sides and rear of the structure are reduced given the proposed proximity to the property lines. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. The two-story mass of the structure will be broken up with a with a change in the facade materials, consistent with the primary structure. In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and Materials and colors have not been identified on the plans though the applicant has indicated the materials and colors will be consistent with the primary residence. colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. Use masonry and stone authentically. No masonry or stone is indicated as proposed. FINDINGS The application demonstrates the structure is suitable for its intended use, consistent with the application for design review and compatible with the character of the design of adjacent developments. Furthermore the propose structure is consistent with the materials and design of the primary residence. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these two requests: A. Approve. If the proposed design review is consistent with the design and materials of the primary residence, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2015-35. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department on July 17, 2015. 2. The materials and colors shall be consistent with the primary residence. 1343 1st Street South HPC: 8/3/2015 Page 3 of 4 3. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The approval shall become effective upon the City's receipt of an application permit signed by the legal property owner. 5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the design and materials of the primary residence, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your September, 2015 meeting. Staff recommends the Commission approve the application the recommended conditions. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Certificate of Survey Facade Renderings and Floor Plans (3 pages) 1343 1st Street South HPC: 8/3/2015 Page 4 of 4 0 The Birthplace of Minnesota 1343 1st Street South Subject Parcel Parcel Boundaries - Municipal Boundary 70 140 280 Feet General Site Location e. G o _ �C7 DD STI u ID 51 July 18, 2015 Attn: Abbi Jo Wittman; City of Stillwater From: Lowell Schmoeckel Subject: New construction garage I am requesting permission from the Planning Commission for approval to build a two story garage. My request for a variance is based on the following: room for two cars, a 16ft- fishing boat, two snowmobiles, snow blower, lawn mower, tool box and a car lift on the East side of the garage. The plans have been drawn are for 980 sq ft lower level and a 658 sq ft upper level bonus room. The reason for the bonus room is for my hobbies such as, model railroading, lure making and to store my collection of Stillwater memorabilia. The plans that I came up with match the design of the existing property, and also the roof style in the neighborhood. Lowell Schmoeckel CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: LOWELL SCHMAECKEL LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 13 and Lot 14, Block 1, of CHURCHILL'S ADDITION TO STILLWATER, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. NOTES: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT LOCATED OR SHOWN EASEMENTS, IF ANY, MAY EXIST. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. THE EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH OR SURVEY THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES FOR GAPS AND OVERLAPS. PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS GARAGE FLOOR = 891.3 AREAS: OVERALL AREA= 13,251 SQ,FT. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA HOUSE=1,41 7 SQ. FT. SHED=98 SQ. FT. CONCRETE=766 SQ. FT. DECK=336 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA=2,61 7 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA HOUSE & PORCH = 1,294 SQ.FT. ADDITION=1 87 SQ. FT. GARAGE=972 SQ. FT. DECKS=261 SQ. FT. SIDEWALKS=312 SQ.FT. DRIVEWAY=1 ,287 TOTAL AREA=4,31 3 SQ.FT. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the tale of Minnesota. DANIEL L. TURMES License. No. 25718 ate 8-27-07 W ©cr CURB AND b 18" TREE GRAVEL SURFACE J 18" .TREE 'E AT) EXISTING HOUSE 30" TREE N89°350 134.33 134.2 ( 15" TREE �i iiiii�}iu-�ii��i DECK STONE WALL - Lu1LLLu1L� m_ , /////ir -- 34.4j ,l////////////i//l// 10 - 18" TREE PROPOSED_ ADDITION __ ///////////////////////i L-__L 20" TREE '-SET DRILL HOLE CONfC. CURB AND CUTTER 0-i o- a001 - ro 134:2 (PLAT) 134.33 S89°34' 10"W ORLEANS STREET (BITUMINOUS,' SURFACE) CONC. CURB AND GUTTER 6- co LILAC BUSHES 6" PINE 10" PINE' 8" PINS 48" STUMP w en cY)VD O o co o o-. ;,GS, FOUND I" —IRON PIPE cp c PROJECT LOCATION: 1343 1ST Street Stillwater, Minnesota NORTH 20 40 SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET LEGEND: SYMBOLS • �852 — 909 — DESCRIPTION WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE OVERHEAD WIRES GAS METER FENCE CONCRETE DENOTES FOUND 1 /2" IRON PIPE DENOTES SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS 25718 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEV. DIRECTION OF PROP. SURFACE DRAINAGE PROPOSED CONTOURS Suite #B100 200 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dlt-csls@ mcleodusa .net CORNERSTONE LANE) SURVEYING, INC �I1TIIMPT c 179 --\ \ — O - L Mi"MiMiii11111''Tillr'iiMiiiii■■■'■■�i'ii�i■"■'ii'ii�ii■'ril�i�i�iii�iiiil:'ii'�ir1'i'i�r'■i ■"�iii�iii�■'�r"r�■i�■�■i ■■■ '■■■■■■■■■N�_.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ �■ON ■■� ■■■ ■■■■■■� ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■�■■ 1iNIMI■■■■-�� ■I■■■■I■■■■1■■■■1■■■■I■■■■I■■■■I■■■■1■■■■1■■■■I■■■■r■■�■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r ■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■ire■■■■■■■■■■■■■r■■i■■■■■�■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■r■■■■■■■■■M■■■■r■■■■r■■■■1■■■■ MILIII■■■r■■■■I■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■M■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r■■■■r ■■■■■■■ ■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1 ■1■■■■I■■■■1■„■I■■■■1■■■■I■■■■1■■■■I■■■■1■■■■I■■■■I■■■ I■■■■Ii�i�r■■■I■■�1■■■■1■■■■��1■■■■I■■■■1■■■■r■■■■r■■■■1■■■■I■■■■r■■■■1 r-� REAR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE -----+-- ti �1 Of' 0 ti LEFT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE J - FLOOR & ROOF LOADING - FLOOR LOADING: LI480 DEF. ROOF LOADING: U240 DEF, LOAD DURATION: 1.00 L.D.F. LOAD DURATION: 1.15 L.D.F. LIVE LOAD: 40 P.S.F. LIVE LOAD: 40 P.S.F. T)PAD I OAD- 15 P S.F DEAD LOAD: 70 P S F TOTAL. LOAD: 55 P.S.F. TOTAL LOAD: 60 P.S.F. III y II RIGHT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE �■ L L , ■■■1■■■ I■■■1■■■■1■■■■1■ �■■■ 11■■■■1 ■/■■; Ut■ 1■■■■■■■■■■■■ !! ■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■ NINE MINIM ■■■■■■■■■■i■■ ■■•■■■■■■■■l■1 ■■■■■ II 11 1■■■■ MI■M■■1.,■■'■■■ I■■■I■■■■I■■■■1■■ I■■■■1■■■■1■■■■1.I 11■■■MI I MINI 1■■■■■1■■■■■■ 1 ■■■■■■ITHINI f' F■■NN' ■■■■ ;:::;::: ;::! :;:::;:: IMM ::: ;::: ;::: ;. MINI .:: I I::: i:■. u:::ammimmicounrum� ' '.' ii. 1111 ' ::C4'.■ �::1 �:1:11 ::�: ■■■■ ■:::::■iI I11 ■::: 11.I BIMI : :,,:'..: : : :: � : � NIIII ■ MINI.i:: N .■U � 11:� ::::■ .::■'M:N. :: � ::■■: ■■■■■I■■■■I�■I■M■■I■MM■I■M■■I■■■■I M■ IH �■.i■1■ra■U■1■■■■I■■■■ MIIMI■aa1■■■■1■■■■r■■■■I■■.■Il/■II■■■■I■■■■I ■ ■1■■/■1 I 1 1 I. IT I 1 I 1 I. 1 1 1. I 1 1 1 1 FRONT ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE - - \ - O --'_\ -- DESIGN PHASE PRELIMINARY DATE: 10.16.2013 CHECK SET DATE: 07.15.2015 FINAL CHECK SET DATE: REVISION 1 DATE: REVISION 2 DATE: REVISION 3 DATE: 46. ABC arrow BUILDING CENTER 876 COUNTY ROAD U HUDSON, WI 54016 PH: 715.386.2371 FAX: 715.386.5804 SCHMOECKEL -GARAGE 1343 1ST STREET - STILLWATER, MN 55082 ARROW BUILDING CENTER OWNS ALL RIGHTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHTS OF THE BLUEPRINTS OR FLOOR PLANS CREATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. ARROW BUILDING CENTER LICENSES THE BLUEPRINT OF FLOOR PLAN TO THE CUSTOMER FOR PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING THE STRUCTURE DEPICTED IN THE BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN. THE CUSTOMER SHALL NOT DUPLICATE, DISTRIBUTE TO THE PUBLIC, OR DISPLAY THIS BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN. THIS BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN IS NOT A WORK MADE FOR HIRE AS DEFINED UNDER 17 U.S.C. SECTION §101. ALTHOUGH EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN PREPARING THESE PLANS AND CHECKING THEM FOR ACCURACY, THE CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER MUST VERIFY GRADES, FOOTING SIZES, ELEVATIONS, ROUGH OPENINGS, HEADER AND BEAM SIZES, ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS AND SPECS, AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. DRAWN BY: GORY TUNHEIM SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET: 1 OF 3 ROOM SIZE & SHAPE MAY VARY BONUS ROOM 11 — 8'-0" CEILING W/ SLOPES 3/4" T&G SUBFLOOR TYPICAL 2x6 EXTERIOR WALL: CEMENT LAP SIDING 7/16" OSB SHEATHING 2x6 STUDS @ 16" O.C. SHOP R19 BATT INSULATION `- g'-g" CEILING 4 mil POLY V.B. 1/2" DRYWALL TAPED & SANDED 3-1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR 6X6-10 X 10 WELDED WIRE MESH 1 COURSE - 8" BLOCK CONTINUOUS THROUGH SLAB AND .. BENT DOWN ALONG EXTERIOR EDGES. 1/ 6'• T\ NI =.-.- 9 ll 1 ._. ' i - 1 - - ONES nE I . _ =,I _==...•• _ � _. 1 _ _ II y- -W---III=W�WIII�AI -. �IA�A..WAI....- - 11 --lJ I - - - _ - _ 1 11 111 1 1 1 1 R 11-111=RI- 111- 111 11-1 — 1 11 Iid _ • —li elll i t ii n>°II®®Ir�l �WI--�. � �W- =m-"=III =-. _ _ _ _ - III==1Ili-L-Ifi- - - - = n -I - ....mW....- I Wi Wm mj_j_iA el - W i I - H - i 111 n - W i I - n - H -11- - I_ a DI= _ . 41@! _ - I iffi i"$I! i-1 -- - - ,- � sumiLIorms I®i1=�1 u- i_ i = iel l i ' ROWS OF CONTINUOUS REBARiE ArallAaii EI= ism N=ril_p1 HICKENED EDGE FOOTINGT_IIEIEI-111i31E11 '- -11 fmlailE1 =11E1- 11=111=111=111=111=111-11-' E111=111=111=111E11EIB EIIE IEIEIb-III 1� IIEII ,_ Par- -11 EH>glll=,t i, "Ell Ell = I =II OU=MMIEIII`_'I,IJ= = IEIIEEEn® 11i81= - IEIIIEIEITi= I wPIIEITIEITIE1T1=ITI=m=wdl mirefflEnnl= 1 -1=1E11®IIEII=IIIEI 1 I -�, Er - - 1: _II F MUM UIEII - MA t3 = E=11=I !=11 IIIEI = E rat- 71 11- - - rr _ 1 r rr-1r_ -. _. _ - MIME _- `-" IEEEMEII MEEEIII=_ , EMEIE EM11-11 EEC N UPPER FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE BONUS ROOM: 658 SQ. FT. XXXXXXXX WINDOWS SHOWN ALL HEADERS TO BE (2) 2X10'S UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL HEADERS 6'-0" WIDE AND LARGER TO HAVE MINIMUM OF 2 TRIMMERS UNDER EACH END UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ?" DIA. GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLT. 0" O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. VO BOLTS PER PIECE MINIMUM. FURTHER THAN 12" FROM ENDS. n `7 - FLOOR & ROOF LOADING - FLOOR LOADING: U480 DEF. LOAD DURATION: 1.00 L.D.F. LIVE LOAD: 40 P.S.F. DFAII I OAD 15 P.S F TOTAL LOAD: 55 P.S.F. ROOF LOADING: U240 DEF. LOAD DURATION: 1.15 L.D.F. LIVE LOAD: 40 P.S.F. fFA01 OAD: 2D P.S.F TOTAL LOAD: 60 P.S.F. 34'-0" 23'-6" BONUS ROOM 8'-0" CEILING W/ SLOPES - • • • idC J W W rx 0 co 1n 0 0) ad ■ N 19 a N O I 4'-3" 3'-7'/e' x 3'-0%" 8'-6" 3'-7%" x 3'-01/8" 3 8'-5%" 10'-6" OPEN TO BELOW VAULTED CEILING VAULT LINE STRUCTURAL SCISSOR GABLE END TRUSS. BALLOON FRAME WALL TO BOTTOM CHORD OF TRUSS. -7''/e' x 3'-0W 3'-7%" x 3'-0%" 8'-61/z' 4'-3" 34'-0" DESIGN PHASE PRELIMINARY DATE: 10.16.2013 CHECK SET DATE: 07.15.2015 FINAL CHECK SET DATE: REVISION 1 DATE: REVISION 2 DATE: REVISION 3 DATE: JIMarrow BUILDING CENTER 876 COUNTY ROAD U HUDSON, WI 54016 PH: 715.386.2371 FAX: 715.386.5804 EL - GARAGE fILLWATER, MN 55082 SCHMOECKI 1343 1ST STREET - S" ARROW BUILDING CENTER OWNS ALL RIGHTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHTS OF THE BLUEPRINTS OR FLOOR PLANS CREATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. ARROW BUILDING CENTER LICENSES THE BLUEPRINT OF FLOOR PLAN TO THE CUSTOMER FOR PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING THE STRUCTURE DEPICTED IN THE BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN. THE CUSTOMER SHALL NOT DUPLICATE, DISTRIBUTE TO THE PUBLIC, OR DISPLAY THIS BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN. THIS BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN IS NOT A WORK MADE FOR HIRE AS DEFINED UNDER 17 U.S.C. SECTION §101. ALTHOUGH EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN PREPARING THESE PLANS AND CHECKING THEM FOR ACCURACY, THE CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER MUST VERIFY GRADES, FOOTING SIZES, ELEVATIONS, ROUGH OPENINGS, HEADER AND BEAM SIZES, ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS AND SPECS, AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. DRAWN BY: CORY TUNHEIM SCALE: 1/4" = 11-0" SHEET: 3oF3 �" a///////////////////////////4 1 /, 7 l / / X / ///// / j j/ 1 COURSE - 8" BLOCK ATOP 3-1/2" CONCRETE SLAB WITH THICKENED EDGE FOOTING 2 ROWS OF CONTINUOUS REBAR / / / / // / j / 1/2" DIA. GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLT. v/1, 6'-0" O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. TWO BOLTS PER PIECE MINIMUM. % N y // NO FURTHER THAN 12" FROM ENDS. ,,L UNEXCAVATED / / / ' / // o 0 4 /I// / / 6X6-10 X 10 WELDED WIRE MESH ' / CONTINUOUS THROUGH SLAB AND 1/ / BENT DOWN ALONG EXTERIOR EDGE$. ' / / �/ y / / \ v/ / _ _. _ - _.. _..._ __ _.-_.. ____. /// ////__ // / 2 -7 I, 16'-3" 3' 1" L 9'-3" 2'-10" 34'-0" FOUNDATION PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE Co N MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE GARAGE: 952 SQ. FT. 9'-9 1/8" HIGH PLATE HEIGHT XXXXXXXXXX WINDOWS SHOWN ALL HEADERS TO BE (2) 2X10'S UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 0 N ALL HEADERS 6'-0" WIDE AND LARGER TO HAVE MINIMUM OF 2 TRIMMERS UNDER EACH END UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. - FLOOR & ROOF LOADING - FLOOR LOADING: U480 DEF. LOAD DURATION: 1.00 L.D.F. LIVE LOAD: 40 P.S.F. DEAD LOAD- 15 P S F TOTAL. LOAD: 55 P.S.F. ROOF LOADING: U240 DEF. LOAD DURATION: 1.15 L.D.F. LIVE LOAD: 40 P.S.F. DAD I OAD: 20 P.S F TOTAL LOAD: 60 P.S.F. 34'-0" 23'-0" 4'-0" x 2'-0" 11'-0" 16'X8' (3) 1.55E - 14" LSL HEADER F TYPICAL 2x6 EXTERIOR WALL: CEMENT LAP SIDING 7/16" OSB SHEATHING 2x6 STUDS @ 16" o.c. R19 BATT INSULATION 4 mil POLY V.B. 1/2" DRYWALL TAPED & SANDED GARAGE VAULTED CEILING 3-1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR • • • O 1n U N c0 LLJ O 2 F FL. VAULT LINE 8' X 8' 10'-8" 15'-11" 7'-5" / DESIGN PHASE PRELIMINARY DATE: 10.16.2013 CHECK SET DATE: 07.15.2015 FINAL CHECK SET DATE: REVISION 1 DATE: REVISION 2 DATE: REVISION 3 DATE: iliamABC Arrow BUILDING CENTER 876 COUNTY ROAD U HUDSON, WI 54016 PH: 715.386.2371 FAX: 715.386.5804 SCHMOECKEL -GARAGE 1343 1ST STREET - STILLWATER, MN 55082 ARROW BUILDING CENTER OWNS ALL RIGHTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHTS OF THE BLUEPRINTS OR FLOOR PLANS CREATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. ARROW BUILDING CENTER LICENSES THE BLUEPRINT OF FLOOR PLAN TO THE CUSTOMER FOR PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTING THE STRUCTURE DEPICTED IN THE BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN. THE CUSTOMER SHALL NOT DUPLICATE, DISTRIBUTE TO THE PUBLIC, OR DISPLAY THIS BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN. THIS BLUEPRINT OR FLOOR PLAN IS NOT A WORK MADE FOR HIRE AS DEFINED UNDER 17 U.S.C. SECTION §101. ALTHOUGH EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE IN PREPARING THESE PLANS AND CHECKING THEM FOR ACCURACY, THE CONTRACTOR/HOMEOWNER MUST VERIFY GRADES, FOOTING SIZES, ELEVATIONS, ROUGH OPENINGS, HEADER AND BEAM SIZES, ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS AND SPECS, AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAME. DRAWN BY: CORY TUNHEIM SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET: 20F3 34'-0" iUwater HE OIWTHPIACE OF MINNESOTA. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-31 APPLICANT: Judd Sather, applicant REQUEST: Demolition request for portions of a Historically Significant Structure located at 123 2nd Street South ZONING: CBD, Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND At the last regularly scheduled meeting the Commission heard a request for the partial demolition of the structure located at 123 2nd Street North. At that time the Commission granted a partial demolition for a portion of the application, that portion of the structure that was identified as the Oil House on the 1925-1956 Sanborn Map. The Commission continued consideration of the demolition of the Leather Findings Warehouse, as identified on the 1925- 1956 Sanborn Map, until the applicant demonstrated maintaining this portion of the building was not feasible and until such time as the materials, elevations, height and design of what would be located in place of the structure was provided to the HPC. To date, the applicant has submitted a supplemental drawing for the demolition request. Additionally, documentation of correspondence of Xcel Energy's review of the supplemental drawing has been provided. Lastly included was further correspondence between staff and Xcel Energy staff regarding the applicant's propose site design and relationship between the company's standards for development of a transformer in relationship to the 16' distance between the factory building and the 1925-1956 Sanborn Map Leather Findings Warehouse. REMAINING DEMOLITION REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of the selective demolition of an addition to the Connolly Shoe Factory, a Nationally Registered Historic Commercial contributing building. The remaining portion for the Commission's consideration is a tile warehouse used originally as an oil house and then as a Leather Findings Warehouse, as depicted on the 1910 and 1925-1956 Sanborn Maps, respectively. A single service door is located on the north side in a concrete area which contains waste receptacles. A single 8:8 glass pane window is located on the west facade. Several of the exterior tiles have broken and fallen off, particularly on the corners of the building and on the north elevation. COMM ERCIAL••••-•iiMemt ®- SUPPLMENTAL DESIGN As the supplemental materials indicate, an 8' tall rock face concrete block wall would be constructed above ground grade at the western and southern boundary of this service area. No material specifications were included in the submission. From the 2nd Street right-of- way, the wall would be 8' in height. The construction of this wall is not only to provide a visual barrier between the service area but also to location. ICY -- Pack Fare Concrete [yak Will wkhI2°Cap 111 ELAN Wald 1 1is z dr xrr ' ^' E. MYRTLE 114t •• Wcil C. 1ELEGNQNE I'Pad xFh►w Cor+crete 51d d s) to rental end be p4,ed �. serve as a non-combustible barrier along the property lines in this The enclosure would house the required transformer and associated air conditioning units for the factory building. The existing concrete slab(s) and chain link fence would remain in place. The fence would be extended to the property line and privacy strips would be inserted. The area is design to accommodate trash facilities necessary for the reuse of the factory building. HPC Case 2015-31 123 2nd Street North Partial Demolition August 3, 2015 APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS City Code chapter 34, Building Demolition, identifies any building or structure or portion of building or structure on the National Historic Register, a designated local heritage preservation site, or a contributing structure or building in a designated national register listed historic district. For historically significant buildings (or portions thereof) proposed for demolition, the Commission determine one of the following: (i) No feasible alternative to demolition. If the commission determines that the owner has made a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the structure and after finding that there is no available feasible alternative to demolition, then the commission shall notify the building official that a demolition permit may be issued, as provided in subsection (3) below. (ii) Feasible alternative to demolition. If the commission determines that there is a feasible alternative to demolition, the permit must be denied. Before approving the demolition of a building, the commission shall make findings that the demolition is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the property, or that there are no reasonable alternatives to the demolition. In determining whether reasonable alternatives exist, the commission shall consider, but not be limited to, the significance of the property, the integrity of the property and the economic value or usefulness of the existing structure, including its current use, costs of renovation and feasible alternative uses. The commission may require a mitigation plan as a condition of any approval for demolition of a building. Such plan may include the documentation of the property by measured drawings, photographic recording, historical research or other means appropriate to the significance of the property. With the approval of the city council, the commission may stay the release of the building, wrecking or demolition permit for up to 180 days as a condition of approval for a demolition of a building that has been found to contribute to a potential historic district to allow parties interested in preserving the historic resource a reasonable opportunity to act to protect it. Additionally, as per City Code Section 22-7, Subd. 7, Findings, the Commission must make the following findings: (2) Prior to approval of any building demolition, the commission shall make written findings of the following: Architectural and historic merit of the building, the effect on surrounding buildings, the effect of any new proposed construction on the remainder of the building (in case of partial demolition) and on surrounding buildings, the economic value or usefulness of the building, as it now exists or if altered or modified in comparison with the value or usefulness of any proposed structures designated to replace the present building. STAFF ANALYSIS As the applicant indicates, this structure was utilized as accessory to the shoe factor operations. While there is no historical or architectural assessment of the addition, it is a part of the HPC Case 2015-31 123 2nd Street North Partial Demolition August 3, 2015 property listed as contributing to the Commercial Historic District, designated locally and nationally. The lack of notation of this portion of the building often suggests they have no historical significance. However, it is common to not have detail of the historical and architectural significance of accessory structures in the National Report. The proposed demolition is due to the site constraints for proposed mixed use to occur in the building after the sale to the applicant. The applicant has conditional approval of a Special Use Permit for the construction of an events venue on the upper story, mixed office/practitioner space on the second level as well as a restaurant space on the lower level, accessed off of Commercial Street. In order to achieve the high -intensity, multi -use of the building, the applicant will need to install a new transformer on the site, new air condition units for the separate floors and lease spaces as well as have a location for enclosed waste receptacles. As the southernmost portion of the addition, the tile shop with the overhead garage door, is older and had continually been a part of the factory's operations, its significance is evident. As the structure's evolution went from being an Oil House and then the Leather -findings Warehouse, the building has been able to be adaptively reused in the past. Additionally, the exterior tile is not common in downtown Stillwater and embodies "...distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, form or treatment." Although Xcel Energy has indicated to staff the 10' required distance would be reduced to 30" and proper separation could be achieved with the construction of (a minimum) 12' non- combustible walls sounding the required mechanical equipment, the applicant has continually maintained sufficient clearances could not be achieved as per the standards of Xcel Energy for distances between the transformers to combustible services in this limited area. As the construction of a 25' long, 10' tall non-combustible wall is required on the west and the south to achieve separation, increasing the amount of wall (in height and length) on the north and east could create an unsightly improvement in this area as well as reduce the function of this service area. The rock face concrete wall proposed may not be in conformance with the Commercial District's Design Manual in that the "use of architectural elements to screen mechanical equipment" is not proposed. Additionally, in regards to materials, the guidelines indicates: • The use of exposed or painted concrete masonry units is not acceptable. • The use of materials that attempt to mimic traditional materials is unacceptable. An example would be fiberglass panels that are molded to look like real brick, or vinyl molded to look like wood horizontal lap siding. DEMOLITION FINDINGS As the application has demonstrated, no feasible alternatives exist. The effect of the partial demolition on the remainder of the Connolly Shoe Factory will be minimal. The demolition of the tile Leather Findings Warehouse will help provide for greater economic value and promote the successful adaptive reuse of this contributing building to the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. HPC Case 2015-31 123 2nd Street North Partial Demolition August 3, 2015 ALTERNATIVES The Commission has the following alternatives: 1. Approve, with or without conditions, the Case No. 2015-31 for the demolition of two accessory structure additions to the structure located at 123 2nd Street North. 2. Deny Case No. 2015-31 on the basis feasible alternatives exist and further consideration of the historical significance is necessary, forwarding a recommendation to the City Council a demolition designation study should be conducted. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the HPC moves to approve Case No. 2015-31 with the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be in substantial conformance with the plans dated 6/21/2015 on file with the office of Community Development. 2. The applicant shall provide 20 amp electrical service to the City of Stillwater for the water pump located at the Sunken Gardens, a contributing historic site in the Commercial Historic District, located adjacent to the building. 3. Documentation shall be provided of the exterior drain flows. In the event the drain is connected to the municipal sanitary system, the drain shall be disconnected and connected to the building. In the event the drain is connected to the stormwater drainage system, the drain shall not be disconnected. Documentation of the disconnection shall be provided. 4. Documentation of the interior and exterior dimensions and conditions, including heights, widths, and materials shall be submitted to the Stillwater HPC and kept on file as a portion of the historical and architectural inventory for the structure. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Supplemental Design (6/21/2015) Xcel Energy Correspondence Site Photographs (4 pages) HPC Case 2015-31 123 2nd Street North Partial Demolition August 3, 2015 ....._.,..... ... 1 Il water 1 «" rts.117 API* 1 , ' ., L' Aix ��- _ iI� tl '"_ t I mas;F ' 3 1 lll�` 1 The Birthplace of Minnesota 123 Second Street South W7`` PX Parcel Boundaries . " - Municipal Boundary r, pr rri : / Area of Selective Demolition 7Ih�lIIL 1 40 " } x ` P —� X 232 ' 218 0 115 230 460 Feet r x�' 4 e✓' x LEY 219 �® f^` 225 PL,_ General Site Location 1�{ �\ .\( ` �� ��, 130 ,_l�<1 204�.ti .1,� +� u CIA ;� 12 � 20 tt 130 �' ` ''1■ o. 12 10 2 A 1 d . o °a• �T • \� cs .� J � 0 r . .. 102. COMWA, 11 n J M C0 Electrical service entru and Switchroom oor °05;b LOMPIN 6/ 2 0 r. 1 10 v; 5ecoo St,/ partial be„ol i / 15 Mari 5, 133 Arai H -967-2085 ion Ilectue5t, nc Shoe Building South Wall I0ft, High Lock race Concrete flock Wall with 12"Cap sine Telephone Hole u p 24" 480v transfc At- Ts ake and exhaust Windows TFLFHHONF � HOL- Well 0 11NkFpHONF Head /--Fxlsting Concrete HOb� Slab( s) to remain and be patched existing Wood frellis bldg. to South Combustible Construction rxisitng chain ink fence to remain and ►e extended then privacu strips to be is.erted 0513 ,V/� J\ M5f Abbi Wittman From: mark balay <mark@balayarchitects.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 12:10 PM To: Abbi Wittman Cc: juddsather@gmail.com Subject: Connelly Shoe Building Demolition Request Supplemental info Attachments: SERVICE AREA VERSION 2.pdf Abbi, Attached is a supplemental drawing for the demolition request. As shared in my earlier email we have found no way to accomplish a transformer in the 16 feet between the Oil House based upon Xcel combined standards and existing site conditions. However we were able to adjust our previous submittal based upon further inspection and have provided a new site plan which reflects what we believe will be be a better solution and be approvable by Xcel and the HPC I have also included a west elevation as requested in meeting. We are still making efforts to confirm our analysis with Xcel about the question of saving the Oil House and get a transformer placed to their safety standards. We hope to actually accomplish that second site meeting with them before the meeting on Aug. 3.and report those findings to you and the HPC. We will advise you when that meeting gets a set time and you or any HPC representative is welcome to attend as previously offered. Mark Mark S. Balay Balay Architects, LLC 110 E. Myrtle St. Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-3312 Abbi Wittman [awittman@ci.stillwater.mn.us] i Abbi Wittman From: Loomis, Kelsey L <Kelsey.L.Loomis@xcelenergy.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:59 PM To: Abbi Wittman Cc: Balay Architects; Fedor, Debra J; Blom, Jeffrey R Subject: Xcel Energy Clearance Standards To whom it may concern: Xcel Energy design and engineering has taken in to consideration the original proposal of the transformer to be located in the approximate 16' space between the two existing buildings, all while, keeping in mind the preservation of the existing historical infrastructure. Unfortunately we are unable to approve that location in its existing state. Per the Xcel Energy Standard for Electric Installation and Use manual, the transformer will not fit in the existing 16' space near operable windows, doorways and combustible walls. The newly proposed location that that was reviewed in the drawing provided by Balay Architects on 6/21/15, is acceptable for Xcel Energy's clearance requirements. Keeping in mind that there is not a structure behind the rock wall and that the door located on the existing building to the south has the required 20' clearance from the transformer. If there are any further questions, comments or concerns, please feel free to contact myself. Thank you for your patience and understanding during this time of review. Kelsey Loomis Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature Electric Distribution Associate Designer 1700 E County Road E, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 P: 651-779-3154 — F: 651-779-3139 E: Kelsey.L.Loomis@xcelenergy.com To view the Xcel Energy Standard for Installation and Use (Blue Book). Please click here: http://www.xcelenergy.com/Energy Partners/Builders & Developers/Commercial Programs/Installation Standards XCELENERGY.COM Please consider the environment before printing this email. This e-mail, and any attachments, may contain confidential or private material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. 1 Abbi Wittman From: Loomis, Kelsey L <Kelsey.L.Loomis@xcelenergy.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:56 PM To: Abbi Wittman Cc: Balay Architects; Fedor, Debra J; Blom, Jeffrey R Subject: RE: Xcel Energy Clearance Standards Abbi, The standards for the height of the non-combustible wall is to be double (2x) the height of the transformer. As heights do vary per manufacturer, an average height of a 500kva transformer is normally 6'. Does that help? Kelsey Loomis Xcel Energy 1 Responsible By Nature Electric Distribution Associate Designer 1700 E County Road E, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 P: 651-779-3154 — F: 651-779-3139 E: Kelsey.L.Loomis©xcelenergy.com From: Abbi Wittman [mailto:awittman@ci.stillwater.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:48 PM To: Loomis, Kelsey L Cc: Balay Architects; Fedor, Debra J; Blom, Jeffrey R Subject: RE: Xcel Energy Clearance Standards Thank you, Kelsey, for sending this over. In our previous discussions you indicated if a non-combustible wall is built, a 30" minimum separation would be valid. While I understand you are commenting on a design submitted by the property owner, would you be able to advise as to the required height of the non-combustible wall(s) required in the 16' space if the existing additions we to be retained onsite? Again, I appreciate all the work you have done on this. Abbi Abbi Jo Wittman P: 651-430-8822 F: 651-430-8810 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us The Birthplace of Minnesota From: Loomis, Kelsey L [mailto:Kelsey.L.Loomis@xcelenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 3:59 PM To: Abbi Wittman <awittman@ci.stillwater.mn.us> Cc: Balay Architects <mark@balayarchitects.com>; Fedor, Debra J <debra.i.fedor@xcelenergy.com>; Blom, Jeffrey R <jeffrey.r.blom@xcelenergy.com> Subject: Xcel Energy Clearance Standards i HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-34 APPLICANT: Bob Eislet, property owner, representing Van Jensen, Lil Tulips owner REQUEST: Consideration of approval of a Design Permit of two signs to be located at Suite A of the structure located at 216 Myrtle Street West ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit to install two new signs at the structure located at 216 Myrtle Street West. Specifically the signs will include: ■ One, nine square foot wall mounted, 2" thick metal sign to be located below an existing recessed light fixture underneath the canopy/awning. The sign will be white and contain the business logo in teal, black lettering to indicate the business name, as well as teal lettering indicating 'home • baby • kids • maternity.' • One, approximately ten square foot awning sign to read ' LIL TULIPS.' The 12" tall, brushed aluminum letters would be identical to those at the US Post Office. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES Wall mounted signs are permitted by the sign ordinance at a ratio of one square foot per one linear foot of business unit frontage. Awning signs are permitted at a ratio of no greater than 50% of the total square footage of the awning or canopy. While the City Sign Regulations indicate awning or canopy signs may not project higher or lower than the awning or canopy, the proposed lettering will not extend above the height of the building parapet and will have a similar design of existing awning/canopy signage on this building, approved by HPC Case No. 2012-9; a copy of the approved building sign plan is attached for review. Municipal Code Section 31-209, Design permit states: • The Standards for Review , Sec. 31-509(f) indicates the HPC shall utilize the following standards: o Outdoor advertising: The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures in relation to the creation of traffic hazards and the appearance and harmony with adjacent development. o Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following (abbreviated) guidelines: • Only one sign that contains the business name or graphic logo ... window sign may be used in addition to other sign types. • Signage should be located in such a way as to not obscure any architectural features. • Use painted wood where practicable. • Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. • The storefront sign should be used to display the primarily name of the business only. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS As signage for this structure was permitted under HPC Case No. 2012-9, the two signs are consistent with the City Sign Regulations as well as the HPC's approval. However, both signs proposed contain the business name, which is not consistent with the Downtown Design Review Manual guidelines. As the HPC has previously approved two signs containing the business name (i.e. US Post Office) located on this building, the proposed application is consistent with the design of existing signage on this property. However, the Commission may determine the findings to be not consistent with the guidelines and condition approval with the removal of the `Lil Tulips' name on the proposed wall signage. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of HPC Case No. 2015-34 with the following conditions: 1. Disturbance to the wood framing shall be done in a fashion as to prevent excess damage and future water intrusion. 2. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Application Proposed Details (2 pages) Building Sign Plan 216 Myrtle Street West HPC 2015-34 (8/3/2015) Page 2 of 2 Lil' Tulips home • baby • kids • maternity 12" TALL 1/4" CUT OUT ALUMINUM PLATE LETTERS PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE- 1 1 SQ. FT. z I 6 3' TALL 1/4" CUT OUT ALUMINUM PLATE LETTERS 20 SQ. FT. 6'-8" X 31-0" - PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE 9 SQ. FT. 3'-0" X 3'-0" - PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE 9 SQ. FT. 3'-0" X 3'-0" - BUILDING SIGNAGE 21.67 SQ. FT. 4'-3 7/8 X 5'-0" 12" TALL 1/4" CUT OUT ALUMINUM PLATE LETTERS 23 SQ. FT. 1'-0" X 23'-0" S�l£NAcr 0 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION TOTAL SIGNAGE ALLOWED 100 SQ. FT. TOTAL SIGNAGE PROPOSED 96.17 SQ. FT. ADDITIONAL BUILDING SIGNAGE - ALLOWED 91 SQ. FT. 3'-0" X 28'-0" TIPJTT Y STATESOTZICEi - STATION PLAQUE 2.5 SQ. FT. PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE - 9 SQ. FT. 3'-O" X 3'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION TOTAL SIGNAGE ALLOWED 100 SQ. FT. - 12" TALL 1/4" CUT OUT ALUMINUM PLATE LETTERS PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE MECHANICALLY FASTENED AT FRONT OF SUN SCREEN HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ERE] P N. 6 3 1.] 3,.,] 6 0 ARCHITECER TS ARCHITECTURE P N N N I NG T E R I OE 3 STILLWATER, MN .x"` 651-1$11760 .51..36 0,6R AooRWWW.EACEB. 02-06-12 STILLWATER RETAIL UNIT Wit 40557 WNW 24210 PROPOSED EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 0 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SIGNAGE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 3, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-37 APPLICANT: Roger Tomten, applicant, representing Jeff and Julie Anderson, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of an Amendment to HPC Case No. 2014-37 and Case 2015-14, Design Permits for the remodel and expansion of an existing garage to accommodate an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on the property located at 119 Chestnut Street West ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGOUND AND REQUEST In December, 2014 the HPC approved Case No. 2014-37 for the remodel and expansion of a garage on the property located at 119 Chestnut Street West. The 2014 approval was modified and resubmitted for the Commissions review (as per Case No. 2015-14) in April of this year. Since that time, the owner has modified the design. The new design is no longer consistent with either of the originally approved HPC design permits and is substantially different from the original approved variances issued by the Planning Commission. In previous designs, the application proposed expanding the structure to the east to maintain the character of the streetscape as well as to preserve views for uphill neighbors. However, the new design increases the height of the structure by one full floor. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND DISCUSSION As a condition of Planning Commission approval for the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Special Use Permit (SUP) and associated variances, a Design Permit is required. City Code Section 31-209 indicates the applicable standards for review of a Design Permit application are: • Architectural character: o The suitability of the building for the intended purpose. o The consistency of the applications design with approved design guidelines. o The compatibility of the character of the design with adjacent development. • Historical structures, vistas, sites and the impact of development on these resources. • Special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. Section 31-501, Subd. 3(7) indicates the application requires design review for consistency with the primary unit in design, detailing and materials. Although the property is located within the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) and the applicant has submitted the NCD Design Review Application and Checklist, the property is not subject to the NCD Guidelines as it is not new infill development on a vacant parcel. The property is subject to the guidelines set forth in the Commercial Historic District Design Manual, as identified in the Stillwater Downtown Plan. The following guidelines can help assist the HPC in determining compliance with the guidelines as well as design consistency, detailing and materials with the primary unit. Proportion • The proportions...should be sympathetic to the proportion of their neighbors. • Break up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures. • Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent structures. The increased floor space on upper story give the appearance the garage and Accessory Dwelling Unit are taller in height than that of the primary structure. As the structure sits less than 5' from the right-of-way in this location, the increase in height is not sympathetic to the neighborhood. Facade detailing is consistent with previously approved designs and aims to break the massing of this structure. Height • Proposals should strive to maintain compatibility with adjacent cornice lines, floor to floor heights where these are strongly expressed...and any other elements which serve to unify the street elevation as a whole. From the 4th Street right of way, the structure will not maintain the one-story appearance. As such, the mass of this structure is not compatible with the existing streetscape and could create a tunneling effect between this structure and the hillside on the western edge of 4th Street. Roofs • Roof edges should be related in size and proportion to adjacent buildings. The roof edges and form will be consistent with the primary structure. Detailing • [A]rchitecture should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding buildings in window shape, cornice lines and brick work. The architecture is consistent with the primary structure. Facade Openings • The size and proportion of windows and door openings...should be similar to those on the adjacent facades. The windows are consistent with that of the primary structure. Materials • [F]acade should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent All materials are consistent with the original design approval. 2015-37: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: July 30, 2015 Page 2 of 4 facades. • New buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatible with the general area. Color • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect. The color scheme will be consistent with the primary structure. FINDINGS The application demonstrates the proposed design is consistent with the primary unit in design, detailing and materials. While the application is consistent with the Design Manual guidelines pertaining to color, materials, facade openings, detailing and roof form, the proposed structure's design creates a significant massing along the 4th Street right-of-way and thereby does not unify the street nor is sympathetic to the neighbors. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these this request: A. Approve. The HPC should move to approve 2015-37. Staff would recommend the following minimum conditions for approval: 1. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Downtown Design Review District guidelines, and the requirements set forth for Accessory dwelling Units in the RB-Two Family District, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial (without prejudice) would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until September, 2015 meeting. Staff recommends the HPC move to deny, without prejudice, Case No. 2015-37 on the basis it does not conform to the Downtown Design Review District guidelines addressing height and proportion. ATTACHMENTS Site Survey Applicant Narrative Request 2015-37: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: July 30, 2015 Page 3 of 4 New Plans (8 pages) Case No. 2014-37 and relevant attachments Case No. 2015-14 and relevant attachments 2015-37: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: July 30, 2015 Page 4 of 4 1 - • w� 1♦ a :via lu�p7 vll �r " S U I k� 4, ti WC8#TY MAP (M0 Knit KEMPER do ASSOCIATES INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 7f1 Pp PO.W7 1 M4 K1r MONO1. 1111110010 11.11 OM-Y1-40M 7.t 011-4f1-O aar: a1M10a1 .•M1M1 w lawa{.•.{,a{a•1 ES5�5�r' Wes-teeQ '' � ww Srd;sue jyG.,. s Js CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ..110 I1r,aaa: M. 1w yP r c t a .w• . Oiawr I,. • I. wPY" w� b M ce. 41, �M w, . LTD. arPs Nen THE ANDERSON RESIDENCE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CITY OF STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA a s Ssa 1i Po WM. f0111/1.. BAN Mee rum D�a�t CL DUO OOC..10 10434* 1{w l 1 04 14 w.D *. r M wy^M a, r 1r..ra. *Poway M w 1101 *PPP wr.r,r MIPS P POPS Ceram,r�� , IEEND =-4—.Mai w+rM.r OP. Pi NM 1N ,na w■ IVAWt.fitk-5 MaOaN MI. , 0 _ Mir..' aA a.p .rw /1fi1 .Ira r� r SOP. J. UN, PP Prw IN WSW w mM{ wa 11rw W. MOIG RLOUMKMCNTS OP lf,., if- w ..aY Mr w r+ar. aawla PIMP • �'7rTr w. awr r - w t�yy� gam_ .{�1 f{4.a4.4 PPM JP 02• pp pp soma WO 'POW PI • a'.,i•F" a•rw.aa.r..WPM w smpa1 POP . Mn 001110 41 IOW ill •WM 4.,Iw. `11 WOO N.A 04. Z. Mar w - w - ilw. . 40 YIPS f sumplossiss.'e'.i..n P.M* / M•PP WWII... asaa.s a u WWI, r0ON* sm..X.113 NM.a.SWIM r ,M.a r ra..ti .ei.a Mt PPP ? •p. MLYY / al r.0rya� la{ ATM 'ii�a.r� P r r .ww., aLra�:. fa .e ..# .- r ■ rQ..tl Y . SM4 r-rM essanapsarl ▪ a,�y • LLr. ., M,+ rr an S a 1.aW aw a SWAM a R1 apya.tUe .aM r M�.ar •al .y VA{�r.�wAw ± tlrr.M MMaf. 4. 07 . ia. MAPCO 1/1 fO1f 411/11W7 1nQt 11LLw$.. 1.MAIRa. IRON 111-111-.74 waa.M Rwwr 4 ~ .f.-- Mrlw �y�MW[ WPf aura rw WM PO 0' SITE SURVEY ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 CARRIAGE WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA ARCHNET 6,0 SHEET 2 OF1eSHEETS �2SEPT20,4 ARCHNET 333 North Main Street Suite 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 Friday, July 17, 2015 City of Stillwater, Ms. Abbi Wittman, City Planner 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 Architecture • Interiors Sustainable Design Phone 651/430-0606 Fax 651/430-2414 www.archnetusa.com RE: Anderson Residence Carriage House, 119 West Chestnut Street Dear Ms. Wittman, Upon receiving approval from the HPC in March, we proceeded with pricing and scheduling the construction of the accessory dwelling unit. The prices we received were far beyond our expectations and the realm of making the project feasible. It turns out that building any structure further to the east from the existing garage is too costly to justify. With that in mind, we bring before you this modified design for your consideration. I have attached digi- tal files of the revisions for your use, and briefly described the changes be- low. The program for the structure has remained the same, but the entirety of the new construction now sits on top of the existing foundation. The size of the accessory dwelling unit now stands at 727 square feet, with 6 foot high knee walls at the perimeter. We have simplified the architectural detail from the previous proposal, but still retain the consistency of design from the main house. We have eliminated the covered parking component on the south elevation and plan to simply reconstruct the two off-street parking stalls that were present originally. The stalls and the modular retaining wall were removed to accommodate landscaping modifications elsewhere on the site. The re- taining wall will be replaced with a natural boulder retaining wall, similar to what is found around the main house. As always, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or if there is additional information needed prior to the HPC meeting on the 3rd of August. Thank you. Yours truly, Roger Tomten Associate, ARCHNET O 1.1 a +b, rip i I II 1 PARKIN 1_ AO "I;I'01 i''oIr�'+'tiI ~ �5. PROPERTY LINE rir 'I,Qt moor snow snEPLAN Scale: 1" 0,10^0" 111111.11.11r ••.. 1 STONE RETAINING WALLS, RECONSTRUCTED IN PREVIOUS LOCATION ADDIJONS & TIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT CARRIAGE STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA g" � ,a , :591 " S;°RD +° k'.�'" lanittact46AZNICA G.Rel 3MOORE" j AR A R C H N E T MARCH DATE' SHEET Al OF,7SHEETS u s a , sMARTTIN 6 GEER337TOTTEN • DAYLIGHT CUPOLA • COMPOSITE SHINGLES NORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXPOSURE Ix6 CORNER TRIM as FINISI-I GRADE WEST ELEVATION Scala 1/4" ■ r-O" AT ERaT ONs TO THE: tVz z - G� J I" 'AIR ARCHNET DACE 26MDATE 16 aJY s SHEET 11 OF,TSHEETS ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT CARRIAGE STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA -., u s a contact: DON MARTIN o ROGERO EN � contact ED HAWKSFORD conMOnAREN ,es ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: • ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA • DAYLIGHT CUPOLA • lx& 4 ix3 FASCIA • 1 x12 FRIEZE • I-4ORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. 1x12 CORNER BD. MIL GAP FLASHING OVER Ix& NORIZ TRIM BD. HORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXPOSURE CEDAR SHINGLES EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION TO REMAIN ----+ RELOCATED RETAINING STONES FINISH GRADE contact: ED HAWKSFORD cell: 651-883-0491 GARDENSIDE contact MONICA MOGREN oe8: 851-7703348 ARCHNET contact: DON MARTIN contact: ROGER TOMTEN cell: 851-248 6795 oe I: 851-303-3275 DATE: 25 MARCH 2O15 2s 2015 15JULY 2015 SHEET 412 OF 17 SHEETS 3 1/B' 2743. (FIELD VERIFY( 1 30'4114. 1,9 1110;,__f C) oof KAI It IMF a0 1? 117e TA Ito 24" O.C. �TYP. 4t7 2747(FIELD VERIFY( 211,7 EDGE OF EXG. P.C. PUUIK�1 1 I j 4 _ - - -. ▪ --4 ▪ _ } _ 1 - -+-) 2' OIIL SONO-TUBE FTO. X 2W DEEP. E. RETAMONOVALL 0 sicTi°,1;; Plan 1 ! 1 l f 1 ! EXISTINGISTORAGE ROOM 1 1 r f EXEC BTL STAIR. UP11R 1 ! i ___—__—_ 1? V4DEARCH. GRADE OCULAR(BEML CUSTOM SAVE BRACKETS (B) TYP. IWJWPS FAG. STONE 46„1/ FOUNDATION JD. EDGE OF EXO. P.C. PLANK 4 L 4-S r CBLK FNDK ON r X 27 CONT. CONC. FTG. VW 244 BARS CONT. 6:7 9 5 10 3,101/7 1rs13NB' r-27/11r 6-r s -i'74CEL DOME T-� - .1 Tom_ DOU Gk151/1721F A DOUO 3' PIPE FIR0L OLU4.A1 COL(4) (ARCH. GRADE) 1 1 WUDNA012 2-VYUDHT3012 WUDNT30f2 WUGHlOIIE 1 UDHPSS62 WUDH 5'41R' 1 \ d • 3'-1016" Iaf$ er Level Plan * $14 3 1/8' PROPERTY LINE 2r4r (FIELD VERIFY) 31/M. '..NeWeQ11C.orsta EXG. RETNNf10 NEWNO. STAIR EMU -RAILING UP sz I li t 24.1 1 — I I 7, 1 • I : O* I SOFFIT FOR ✓ f STAIRABOVE 1 47 11 EXO. RETAINING VWLL Ganpi!..evel Plan 13''4' 1 SLOPE FlOpl e STMNED61. WOW EXG GARAGE 1 rem PIPE (* COL TIT. (4) 1 I I I b 3JADK STUDS &2-AONO STUDS TYP EA. we REMOVE EMS. TOPPING. PROVIDE & INSTAILNEW 4. THICK CONC. TOPPING OVER LID. APPLIED WATERPROOFING Lk Rom► SAW CUT EXG. P.C. PLANK EDGE AND GROUT SOLID TO STONE FNON. FOR COL ERG. TYP (4). 4' THICK CONC. STOOP. —�i \STRUC.BR c11ET8 Q BALC. 4,17 ARCHNET U S a xeAkeeUrs • Motorises sotslr6UMe Seaga 333 N Moir St. Ste. 201 SISlwater, MN 55082 651.430.0606 Srdinetusa•com CONSULTANTS Built Environlnints 2880 Curve Craft sad. Culls 220 616F/Ir4r, PAN 66082 Anderson Carriage House 119 West Chestnut Street Stillwater, Minnesota // MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUED IMTH GEN.REV.: 07/01/2015 ISSUED FOR PERMIT: 06/24/2015 DRAM BY: CHK'D BY: SHEET TITLE FLOOR PLANS LHEE 20 F al A-1 Torfirro Al :rrI LY r ■ r�4w sE.�.IXrzr /X! w fiIrk area �r�IAMI ° s4 11,494%UArlPa4 Jrr r 'IC�ICC virLA..sw rein Rs�W 4r81+Yf4jf1t oMFr.M�ip MTi ir' rinHril h- 1 r.l grrorrirrare ij rtrligr4T isoirrimi rr ■ arrrrTrrrirrri rir'rrrrLirl rir nirriiiriqgr—Qi it dig, r�ir'��iririi�ir�ir�4,arilmanit.oiriurrii��i roat��`rbiii i r ni`rr- rr i ii Xmas ur wti ggewH`rria� r . 1.. nrurnrrrirrirrrirxq.r.t. Sulit Environments me Burts no Mesater, MN NOV areonvincomante.Wnwom. kI NIIINlllll i t IrIAII i QNIIIll1�I AI I 477 ir/LfAKS • r 2 Xe-RAPTERTWS •EA. JOIST I■I ®Cross Section a West Gable WALE 111P • CO 5-i N4 26 1!Y 1'151A'yr,f 1+uTiElr�� RI d®l iii i 1 e 1 ■ �1 11TT TJ 5a 24. O.C. TAP. 1? MADE ARCH. GRADE / GLUIN.I BEAM. le Cross Section BCALE.1M • 1-0' CUSTOM EAVE BRACKETS (SITAR. W1LF-HIPS RIDGERAFTER FRAME & BRACE TOP OF OLUTAM E.A. SIDE OF DOME ARCHTECTLHtALGRADE OLUINA BM. LEADED GLASS DOME Cupola Longitudinal Building Section WALE TAT . 11 SIM • T.O.NPLL PLATE � t Upper Level f TA.SUBl.00R GarVeE 5LTI L7/iTriTiJ.f = RitiTiPlY�i�T Nl_ • STRUCTURALBRACIOTS 4 BALC. SUPPORT PIPE COL. CUT EXG. P.C. FLANKAND GROUT SOLID TO FNON. • PIPE COL.S BEVELED BEARING PLATE TYPICAL TYPICAL ROOP'R•AT CEDAR SHAKES CEDAR BREATHER ICES VWTERSIELDUNDERLAYMEIIT HUNTER NB PAKELGir PL'AND.A 2 /? RIGID INSULATION 1? EXT. PLYPD. ROOF SIEATHING 11 TTTJI JOISTS 20 0.C. P C.C. SPRAY POAM GYP. BD. OR MOD PANEL FINISH 42S-e' Pr L 2 51A' X 1S 1?ARCHITECTURAL GRADE GLU-LAM BEAM. ,;21.4 Piplectlaro TYPIGA) WAU' R•.18 CEDAR SIDING HOMESUCKERMAX IOmm RAIN SCREEN LIDUIDAPPLED WIB HUNTER NB PNIELGAFEXT. PLYYA 8 x i r RIGID PISULATION 2 X A STUDS 2' C.C. SPRAY FOAM DISUL GYP. BD. OR NEL PANEL FIN. 7,11T Proi a:Lre \�-2-PLY LVL HEADER IN/l Building Cross Section 11Miir• -r FJ 2 ArSP11LY R.30 314 OYPCRETETOPPING PM TXG PLYWO. SUBFLOOR I 4X2 OPENNES FLOOR JETS. IT O.L. (TOP CHORD BEARBIGOYLEST UTALLI P C.C. SPRAYFOAM INSULUNDER DECK ear TYPE x GYP. BD. CEIL REMOVE EXG CONC. TOPPING. PROVIDE B INSTALL NEW P CONC. TOPPING W RADIANT FEAT TUBES OVER UOUIDAPPUEDVATERPROOFING BARRIER. EXG. P.C. PLANK EXG. STONE FOUNDATION J Praise Z•ro ARCHNET U J a ardiMebpe • 6t5aNn aoMYile Odin 333 N Mob SC Sow 201 Slitheater, MN 55052 651430 0606 •rlt hnetuus.com Built Environments 2950 Cum, Crest IMM. eulte 220 $tiwYr, MN 55052 b W FanvkoMMnte. eonwww. Anderson Carriage House 119 West Chestnut Street Stillwater, Minnesota MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ISSUED WITH GEN.REV.: 07/01/2015 ISSUED FOR PERMIT: 06/24/2015 DRAWN BY: CHK'D BY: SHEET TITTLE BUILDING SECTIONS A-3 SHEET 22 OF :3' 61il:liiwla.: MAU RELOCATED RETAINING STONES ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: Sc1da: 1/4" ■ 1"-O' ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA cordact: ED HAWKSFORD cat 65t-913-0491 contact MONICA MOGREN c I: 651-770.9346 DAYLIGHT CUPOLA • COMPOSITE SHINGLES • 1x8 FASCIA AND GUTTER SYSTEM HORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. Ix8 CORNER 5OARD I-IORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. COMPOSITE SHINGLES • Ix12 FRIEZE !BOARD DECORATIVE BRACKET HORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. CONCRETE STOOP EXISTING STONE FOUNDATON WALL TO REMAIN RELOCATED RETAINING STONES FINISH GRADE ARCHNET 0 contact DON MARTIN contact ROGER TOMTEN ceH: 651.248-6795 cat 651 75 DATE: 25 MARCH 2O15 25 2015 15 JULY 2015 SHEET Ili OF 17 SHEETS DAYLIGHT CUPOLA CEDAR SHINGLES • lx8 RAKE FASCIA WROUGHT IRON BALCONY RAIL METAL FLASHING OVER 1x& HORIZONTAL TRIM S. • HORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. lx8 CORNER BOARD 1x8 FRIEZE BOARD —+ FINISH GRADE NORT14 ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" • P-0" ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA �1e,a4Axd _1JQSil, yrL confect ED HAWKSFORD cs1: 551-883.0491 ARCHNET contact. ROGER TOMTEN cell: 551303-3275 DATE: 25 MARCH 2015 REV: 25 MAY 2015 15 JULY 2015 SHEET 414 OF 17 SHEETS !11atr THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA Case No.: DP/2014-37 HPC Meeting: 11/3/2014 DESIGN PERMIT Heritage Preservation Meeting Date: 11/3/2014 ActionNote: Approved 7-0 Received NOV IT iummun ty Development Department Description of Project: Remodel existing garage into Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). Applicant(s): Roger Tomten, Applicant Jeff Anderson, Owner Project Address: 119 W Chestnut St, Stillwater, MN 55082 Property ID No.: 2803020420115 Zoning District: RB Conditions of Approval: ORIGINAL 1 All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 2 Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. We accept the conditions of this permit. We understand that any changes from these plans must be resupmitted for approval. Owner or Representati e i 11 oimf Date A design permit is granted pursuant to the zoning ordinance and is not a substitute for a building permit. The city building official issues a building permit after approval of the plans and payment of the building permit fee and state surcharge. This design permit will be null and void if the project that is permitted by this permit is not completed within two years from the date the permit is granted. Page 1 of 1 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: November 4, 2014 CASE NO.: DR/2014-37 APPLICANT: Roger Tomten, applicant, representing Jeff and Julie Anderson, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of Design Review for the remodel and expansion of an existing garage to accommodate an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on the property located at 119 Chestnut Street West ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST AND BACKGOUND The applicant has submitted a Design Permit application for consideration of design review of a proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) to be added onto the existing garage located at 119 Chestnut Street West. In October the Planning Commission considered an application requesting a Special Use Permit (SUP) for the ADU as well as variances associated with the construction. The Planning Commission approved the SUP and the following variances: 1. Variance from the maximum number of permitted stories to all for two stories and a loft. 2. Variance from the 30 foot setback required from the 4th Street right-of-way for the structure to sit at the existing setback line. 3. Variance from the 30 foot bluff setback requirement for the structure to sit at the bluff line. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND DISCUSSION Section 31-501, Subd. 3(7) indicates the application requires design review for consistency with the primary unit in design, detailing and materials. Although the property is located within the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) and the applicant has submitted the NCD Design Review Application and Checklist, the property is not subject to the NCD Guidelines as it is not new infill development on a vacant parcel. The property is subject to the Downtown Design Review Guidelines. The following Downtown Design Manual guidelines can help assist the HPC in determining design consistency, detailing and materials with the primary unit. Proportion • The proportions...should be sympathetic to the proportion of their neighbors. • Break up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures. • Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent structures. The property owners worked with their neighbors on a suitable design that would not detract from the neighborhood. From the 4th Street right of way, the structure maintains a one- story appearance. Height • Proposals should strive to maintain compatibility with adjacent cornice lines, floor to floor heights where these are strongly expressed...and any other elements which serve to unify the street elevation as a whole. The addition of a dormer on the west facade and balconies on the north and south facades will help break up of the facade. The existing garage will not increase in height. Roofs • Roof edges should be related in size and proportion to adjacent buildings. The roof pitch will be maintained while the proposed dormer will have a similar pitch as the primary structure. Detailing • [A]rchitecture should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding buildings in window shape, cornice lines and brick work. The design proposes maintaining the existing stone foundation. Additionally the design proposes utilizing 1X6 head, jamb, and cornice trim, fascia and frieze boards, designed consistent with the time period of the primary structure. Facade Openings • The size and proportion of windows and door openings...should be similar to those on the adjacent facades. The applicant has proposed a window plan that is consistent on three sides visible from the street. Larger windows on the east elevation will allow for enhanced views of the river. Eastern windows are not visible from lower elevations. As window openings on the primary structure are uniquely different from one another, the proposed openings are of a more consistent design. Materials • [F]acade should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades. • New buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatible with the general area. Horizontal, lap cedar siding is proposed with vertical bead board. These are consistent materials with the primary structures as well as other residences in this neighborhood. Additionally, the design encompasses wrought iron balcony fencings and balcony bracketing typical of the era of construction of the primary residence. DR/2014-37: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: November 4, 2014 Page 2 of 3 Color • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect. The color scheme will be consistent with the primary structure. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these this requests: A. Approve. If the proposed design review request is found acceptable to the HPC, the HPC should move to approve DP/2014-37. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Downtown Design Review District guidelines, and the requirements set forth for Accessory dwelling Units in the RB-Two Family District, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until December, 2014 meeting. Staff recommends approval of the design as conditioned, above. ATTACHMENTS Applicant Narrative Request NCD Application (2 pages) Site Aerial, Survey and Plan (Pages 1-4) Site Concepts (3 pages) Floor Plans (3 pages) Cross Section (1 page) Facade Renderings and Materials (5 pages) Existing Site Conditions (1 page) DR/2014-37: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: November 4, 2014 Page 3 of 3 ARCHNET 333 North Main Street Suite 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 Friday, October 17, 2014 City of Stillwater, Ms. Abbi Wittman, City Planner 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 Architecture • Interiors Sustainable Design Phone 651/430-0606 Fax 651/430-2414 www.archnetusa.com RE: Anderson Residence, 119 West Chestnut Street, Stillwater, MN Dear Ms. Wittman, Please find attached the Design Review Application for the expansion of the An- derson's detached garage to accommodate an Accessory Dwelling Unit. We un- derstand that the HPC is charged with reviewing the design for compatibility with the main structure and neighborhood context. Because of the unique history and topography of the site, the location for the ADU focused on the existing detached garage. The proposed project will renovate the garage and add an Accessory Dwelling Unit that will be used as an office/studio. After numerous designs, it became apparent that any height increase above the existing ridge line would have a negative impact on adjacent property view -sheds. The final design responds by attaching the ADU to the east side of the existing garage, on two levels, within the height of the existing structure. The existing garage will be rebuilt to include one wider garage door (designed to reflect two smaller doors) and one service door facing Fourth Street. A portico is designed to provide cover for one of the two existing off-street parking spaces. The parallel gable of the existing garage will remain with the addition of a roof dormer facing west. Roof pitches will match the existing structure or reflect the main house. All exterior materials, details and colors are compatible with the main house. As always, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or if there is additional information needed to complete the application. Yours truly, Roger To Associate. - CHNET Design Review Application and Checklist This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form Contact: Stillwater City Planning Office 651-430-8821 City Hall 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 www.ci.stillwater.nm.us Project Address: 11S W. CHESTNUT ST. Applicant name, address, telephone: ROGER TOMTEN ARCI-ENET 333 N. MAIN ST., STE. 201 STILLWATER, MN 6.51.303.3215 1. Neighborhood Architectural Styles: i3; Vernacular 13; Italianate )Ef Queen Anne ❑ Gothic )� Greek Revival ❑ Second Empire ❑ American Foursquare ❑ Stick ❑ Other: 2. Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback: (Guidelines #1, #2, #3) Prevailing setback on block (est.) Average setback on block (est.) Proposed new house setback NA 3. Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1, 1-1/2, or2 stories high? (Guidelines #4, #5) Stones 1 1-1/2 House on right ❑ ❑ House on left ❑ ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ ❑ Prevailing opposite block ❑ ❑ Proposed new house ❑ ❑ 2 4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your neighborhood: (Guideline #13) Front Porch None House on right ❑ ❑ House on left ❑ ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on block )f ❑ Prevailing opposite block l ❑ Proposed new house ❑ ❑ Notes: 5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) Front Rear Side Garage Garage Garage House on right House on left House to rear ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ )3: 6. Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) 1 stall 2 stall 3 stall Garage Garage Garage House on right House on left House to rear Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ 131 7. Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house? (Guideline #14) YES. ROOF PITCH, TRIM DETAILS tt MATERIALS RELATE TO MAIN HOUSE. 8. If the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighborhood and streetscape? Tl-4F 1 OCATION OF TI-1F F>CISTING DETACI-4ED GARAGE IS DETERMINING TI-4E LOCATION OF THE ADU. THE SLUFF LINE 15 INFLUENCING THE MASSING OF THE STRUCTURE. Stillwater Conservation District (p 1 of 2) Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist 9. Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property? (Guidelines #6, #7, #8) ❑ Structure sited parallel to slope la Building deigned to reduce cut and fill (minimized retaining walls) ❑ Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes: ESUILDING STEPS TO AVOID THE ESLUEE LINE. 10. Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? (Guideline #9) ❑ Types of trees ❑ Heights ❑ Trunk diam. Notes: NO SIGNIFICANT TREES WILL ESE IMPACTED 5Y THE PROJECT. Good Neighbor Considerations 1. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunlight in adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) House to right: House to left: House to rear: Notes: NO. THE DESIGN OF TI-4E STRUCTURE MINIMIZES INTERUPTIONS TO EXISTING VIEWSHEDS. How will you mitigate any negative sunlight impacts on neighbors? ❑ Locate structure on lot to minimize impact ❑ Adjust building height, or portions of building, to minimize impact ❑ Other: 2. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines #22,#23) House to right: House to left: House to rear: Notes: NO, How will you mitigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? ❑ Offset/locate windows to reduce impact ❑ Use obscure glass in window ❑ Locate balconies to minimize impact. ❑ Use landscaping elements for screening ❑ Other: 3. How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors?(Guideline #25) Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property X Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property ❑ Other: To be included with this Application and Checklist: 0 Site Plan: include location of proposed building(s) on property, lot area; indicate impervious surface, property lines, street/ sidewalk location and approximate location of adjacent structures. Indicate proposed outdoor deck/patio and landscaping features. 14 Building Plan: dimensions, first floor area square footage. l� BuildingElevations: indicate building height, windows, materials, and color on all elevations. Indicate proposed exterior lighting. la Photographs of site and streetscape. Regular Planning Department Development Application Form Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines (p2of2) ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ARCHNET a 23 SEPT 2014 2 SEPT 2014 SITE AERIAL SHEET 1 OF 11 SHEETS 1 - • w� 1♦ a :via lu�p7 vll �r " S U I k� 4, ti WC8#TY MAP (M0 Knit KEMPER do ASSOCIATES INC. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 7f1 Pp PO.W7 1 M4 K1r MONO1. 1111110010 11.11 OM-Y1-40M 7.t 011-4f1-O aar: a1M10a1 .•M1M1 w lawa{.•.{,a{a•1 ES5�5�r' Wes-teeQ '' � ww Srd;sue jyG.,. s Js CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ..110 I1r,aaa: M. 1w yP r c t a .w• . Oiawr I,. • I. wPY" w� b M ce. 41, �M w, . LTD. arPs Nen THE ANDERSON RESIDENCE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CITY OF STILLWATER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA a s Ssa 1i Po WM. f0111/1.. BAN Mee rum D�a�t CL DUO OOC..10 10434* 1{w l 1 04 14 w.D *. r M wy^M a, r 1r..ra. *Poway M w 1101 *PPP wr.r,r MIPS P POPS Ceram,r�� , IEEND =-4—.Mai w+rM.r OP. Pi NM 1N ,na w■ IVAWt.fitk-5 MaOaN MI. , 0 _ Mir..' aA a.p .rw /1fi1 .Ira r� r SOP. J. UN, PP Prw IN WSW w mM{ wa 11rw W. MOIG RLOUMKMCNTS OP lf,., if- w ..aY Mr w r+ar. aawla PIMP • �'7rTr w. awr r - w t�yy� gam_ .{�1 f{4.a4.4 PPM JP 02• pp pp soma WO 'POW PI • a'.,i•F" a•rw.aa.r..WPM w smpa1 POP . Mn 001110 41 IOW ill •WM 4.,Iw. `11 WOO N.A 04. Z. Mar w - w - ilw. . 40 YIPS f sumplossiss.'e'.i..n P.M* / M•PP WWII... asaa.s a u WWI, r0ON* sm..X.113 NM.a.SWIM r ,M.a r ra..ti .ei.a Mt PPP ? •p. MLYY / al r.0rya� la{ ATM 'ii�a.r� P r r .ww., aLra�:. fa .e ..# .- r ■ rQ..tl Y . SM4 r-rM essanapsarl ▪ a,�y • LLr. ., M,+ rr an S a 1.aW aw a SWAM a R1 apya.tUe .aM r M�.ar •al .y VA{�r.�wAw ± tlrr.M MMaf. 4. 07 . ia. MAPCO 1/1 fO1f 411/11W7 1nQt 11LLw$.. 1.MAIRa. IRON 111-111-.74 waa.M Rwwr 4 ~ .f.-- Mrlw �y�MW[ WPf aura rw WM PO 0' SITE SURVEY ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 CARRIAGE WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA ARCHNET 6,0 SHEET 2 OF1eSHEETS �2SEPT20,4 Chestnut Street Stairs S. 3rd Street S. 4th Street a3 ei5 a) O ADDITIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT CARRIAGE STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA A RC H N E T W O 42SEPT2014 4 SEPT 2014 SHEETALTERATIONS 3 OF 10 SHEETS Chestnut Stree POOL & PATIO EXISTING HOUSE S. 4th Street NEW A.Q.U. EX GA ING SITE DATA - ORIGINAL LOT 150x168 OVERALL SITE AREA 25,298 SF. BUILDINGS 2,758 SF. 11% IMPERVIOUS 5,974 SF. 24°/O OPEN SPACE 16,565 SF. 65%O SITE DATA - WITH ADDITIONAL 35' x 50' LOT OVERALL SITE AREA 27,047 SF. BUILDINGS 3,072 SF. 11% IMPERVIOUS 6,235 SF. 23% OPEN SPACE 17,740 SF. 66°/O 35' O" • GE LOT REALIGNMENT ADDITIONS &HOUSE TO THE: 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTAISI ARCHNET ��4 22SEPT2 014 4 PT 201411 8NEeT� OF 11 SHEETS U EXISTING VIEW VIEW OF CONCEPT B-2.5 ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: VIEW OF CONCEPT A VIEWS FROM 205 CHESTNUT VIEW OF CONCEPT C VIEW OF CONCEPT DI ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ARCHNET Ell lel 238EP2014 08EP2014 15 AUG 2014 SHEET 5 OF 10 SHEETS EXISTING VIEW VIEW OF CONCEPT B-2.5 VIEW OF CONCEPT A VIEWS FROM 208 4th STREET ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: VIEW OF CONCEPT C VIEW OF CONCEPT DI ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ARCHNET a 23 SEP 2014 9 SEP 2014 1SAUO2014 SHEET s OF 18 SHEETS EXISTING VIEW LY VIEW OF CONCEPT B-2.5 VIEW OF CONCEPT A VIEWS FROM 220 4th STREET ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: VIEW OF CONCEPT C ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA VIEW OF CONCEPT D1 ARCHNET 000 23SEP 2014 9 SEP 2014 15AU02014 SHEET 7 OF 16 SHEETS EXISTING RETANNG WALL TO REMAIN •---� d \\'ik EXISTING FOUNDATION WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL REMOVED FOR INSTALLATION OF POST FOOTNGS. REPLACE WITi-I LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL POST FOOTINGS • NEW STOOP 4 WALK TO MATCH EXG. s >0 0 r F f 40// t 44/ s LOWER LEVEL 1 /8" = 1 1-0" 284 SQ.FT. CONCEPT D 1 ADDITIONS & H SHEET ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE A R C N E T ALTERATIONS TO THE: 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA al --- 5 El z��P�,�8 14 as AUG014 �eo ��� OF 11 SHEETS EXISTING STAIRS •1 r \ COVERED PARKING �1 UNCOVERED PARKING t% t MAIN LEVEL 1/8"= 1'-0" 315 SQ.FT. CONCEPT D1 ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 CARRIAGE WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA ARCHNET 170CT2014 22014 9 SEP 2014 15AU02014 SHEET 9 OF1SSHEETS • ATTIC LEVEL 1 /8" = 1'-0" CONCEPT D 1 ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ; ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE A R C H N E'I° OCT Y01• 1?9 8EP 201• 13AUG 2014 SHEET 1 OF18SHEETS 0 ni,1T 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONSANDERSON TO THE: ARCHNET EEC 014 2014 15AUG 2014 SHEET 1 1 OF15SHEETS 119 CARRIAGE HOUSE WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA CIs • CEDAR SHINGLES 1x6 HEAD TRIM 1x6 41x3 FASCIA Ix& FRIEZE Ix6 JAMB TRIM WROUGHT IRON BALCONY FENCE HORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. �--• 8 x 8 COLUMN • VERTICAL BEAD BOARD EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION West Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ADDITIONS &CARRIAGEA ALTERATIONS TO THE: 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA RC H N E T i SEP 2014 15AUG 2014 SHEET 12 OF10SHEETS N a _ _ii:IIIL4%'%%,.._ 41 9, • foAii : *AI .■..ioiiOS. i!0log 41. 1s, 0',llMsiii dulir06.111*ra•a11,+..,4it • .1;1° I 111411 1 1 I I I 1 I H11 1 •41.`V z • CEDAR SHINGLES 1x6 FASCIA Ix6 JAMB TRIM • Ix12 TRIM BOARD • lx6 CORNER TRIM • 1x4 WINDOW TRIM • VERTICAL BEAD BOARD • 1x12 RIM BOARD 4x4 BALCONY BRACKET FINISH GRADE South Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA A R C H N E T 23 8EP 2014 15AUG 2014 13 OF14SHEETS MEET Cal s 1 a CEDAR SHINGLES 1x6 HEAD TRIM lx6 1x3 FASCIA lx6 FRIEZE 1x6 JAMB TRIM WROUGHT IRON BALCONY FENCE 1x12 TRIM BOARD 4x4 BALCONY BRACKET Ix6 CORNER TRIM Ix4 WINDOW TRIM VERTICAL BEAD BOARD 1x12 RIM BOARD FINISH GRADE East Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ADDIDTIAONS & ALTERATIOrrs TO THE: ANDERSON 119 CARRIAGE HOUSE WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ARCHNET 23 SEP 2014 014 SAUGpgE2Z014 114 SHEET 14 OF18SHEETS waA a • CEDAR SHINGLES • lx6 HEAD TRIM • 1x6 t 1x3 FASCIA lx6 FRIEZE lx6 JAMB TRIM WROUGHT IRON BALCONY FENCE 1x12 RIM BOARD 4x4 BALCONY BRACKET • WORM LAP CEDAR SIDINGS, 4" EXP. lx6 CORNER TRIM 1x4 UUINDOUJ TRIM VERTICAL BEAD BOARD • 1x12 RIM BOARD • EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION North Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA A R C H N E T 23 SEP 20u 15AUG 2014 SHEET '1 OF10SHEETS 5 UIn ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: 111101111 1 'loin lrrrruSrr riI ■ 11 ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA VIEW OF CONCEPT DI ARCHNET 23 SEP 2914 9 SEP 2914 15 AUG 2014 SHEET 16 OF 10 SHEETS ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON CARRIAGE HOUSE 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ARCHNET 5 a 15 AUG 2014 SHEET EXISTING PHOTOS iliwater OF Mix Nl SOTA Case No.: DP/2015-14 HPC Meeting: 4/6/2015 DESIGN PERMIT Heritage Preservation Meeting Date: 4/6/2015 ActionNote: Approved 6-0 Description of Project: Amendment to Design Review - DR/2014-37 Applicant(s): Jeff Anderson, Owner Roger Tomten, Applicant Project Address: 119 Chestnut St W, Stillwater, MN 55082 Property ID No.: 2803020420115 Zoning District: RB Conditions of Approval: OR 1 All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 2 Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. We accept the conditions of this permit. We understand that any changes from these plans must be resubmitted for approval. resentative ei-71,111 Date Cit anner' IVV) Dat A design permit is granted pursuant to the zoning ordinance and is not a substitute for a building permit. The city budding official issues a building permit after approval of the plans and payment of the building permit fee and state surcharge. This design permit will be null and void if the project that is permitted by this permit is not completed within two years from the date the permit is granted. Page 1 of 1 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: April 6, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-14 APPLICANT: Roger Tomten, applicant, representing Jeff and Julie Anderson, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of an Amendment to Design Review Case 2014-37 for the remodel and expansion of an existing garage to accommodate an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on the property located at 119 Chestnut Street West ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGOUND AND REQUEST In December, 2014 the HPC approved Case No. 2014-37 for the remodel and expansion of a garage on the property located at 119 Chestnut Street West. Since that time, the owner has modified the design. The new design is no longer consistent with the originally approved HPC design permit. Changes include: West Facade: The western (front) facade will remain as originally proposed and approved by the HPC. North Facade: The existing structure facade will remain largely as approved. The eastern portion, however, is proposed to be significantly changed by the addition of a vertical, Victorian design feature. This is to create an entrance to the structure by incorporating two bronze doors. Stained glass will adorn the windows above the vertical feature. East Facade: Where the entire east facade was approved as windows, all window shapes have been proposed to be changed. Additionally, a stained glass feature will be locate on the 2nd story portion. The roofline is proposed to be changed to incorporate a vertical, Victorian design element of the home. This, too, will contain stained glass and a cupola. This new feature will project further to the north than the original design. South Facade: The existing structures facade will remain largely as approved. The two-story addition, to the east, will be modified from two single windows to three tall windows, one which will contain a stained glass element. Small, square windows will top the linear windows. The height of this portion of the structure is proposed to increase. Where four identical windows were approved on the original submittal, the eastern -most portion of the structure will contain one stained glass window on the lower level and three smaller windows will be on the second and attic levels. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND DISCUSSION Section 31-501, Subd. 3(7) indicates the application requires design review for consistency with the primary unit in design, detailing and materials. Although the property is located within the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) and the applicant has submitted the NCD Design Review Application and Checklist, the property is not subject to the NCD Guidelines as it is not new infill development on a vacant parcel. The property is subject to the Downtown Design Review Guidelines. The following Downtown Design Manual guidelines can help assist the HPC in determining design consistency, detailing and materials with the primary unit. Proportion • The proportions...should be sympathetic to the proportion of their neighbors. • Break up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures. • Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent structures. From the 4th Street right of way, the structure maintains a one-story appearance. The proposed design gains in height and width dimensions, creating greater mass to the structure. Height • Proposals should strive to maintain compatibility with adjacent cornice lines, floor to floor heights where these are strongly expressed...and any other elements which serve to unify the street elevation as a whole. The addition of a dormer on the west facade and balconies on the north and south facades will help break up of the facade. The existing garage will not increase in height. Roofs • Roof edges should be related in size and proportion to adjacent buildings. The roof pitch will be maintained while the proposed dormer will have a similar pitch as the primary structure. However, new roof pitches are proposed on the east elevation with a vertical design element on both the north and east. Detailing • [A]rchitecture should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding buildings in window shape, cornice lines and brick work. While the proposed design incorporates traditional design elements, and those approved with the original design submittal, the new design is not consistent on all four sides. Facade Openings • The size and proportion of windows and door openings...should be similar to those on the adjacent facades. The windows are not consistent on all four sides. While the incorporation of stained glass into the design is one attribute to this, the design incorporates several different sizes and shapes of windows in varied patterns. 2015-14: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: April 6, 2015 Page 2 of 3 Materials • [F]acade should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades. • New buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatible with the general area. All materials are consistent with the original design approval. Changes to the design include incorporation of stained glass, inclusion of stone veneer, and the installation of bronze doors. Color • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect. The color scheme will be consistent with the primary structure. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these this requests: A. Approve. If the proposed design review meets the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve 2015-14. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Downtown Design Review District guidelines, and the requirements set forth for Accessory dwelling Units in the RB-Two Family District, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until May, 2015 meeting. Staff recommends the HPC discuss the amendments with the applicant and take action on the proposed amendment. ATTACHMENTS Applicant Narrative Request NCD Application (2 pages) Originally approved plans (4 pages) Narrative and Amended plans (18 pages) 2015-14: 119 Chestnut Street West HPC: April 6, 2015 Page 3 of 3 are.`7 L.,-,Ca�k 7 1ir APPO.7.1boATr MD r Waif F.!Lw laH t13.t-8 1 � Kvut OF Ur 7 EXISTING POWER POLE. SITE PLAN Scale: 1" = 10'-O" — LHE o- N AR7}t ttTLY L'7.00 FPTT Ws U T 7 TIE NEW WALK INTO EX SIDEWALK e:t.12X PATIO 1 4 tha` t.7 CF. r. -1 �. se.te Pf -i OF 1 ‘' 1 i es, 9 REPLACE EXISTING FENCE/ MAINTENANCE STRIP �59 wt.- JF tj. ..ar 7 }7UrrlEt.Y L.N€ tor Lore ti vo PD �Q- PROPERTY4NE AFTER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SURVEY INFORMATION: PROVIDED BY: KEMPER ASSOC'S. NEW BRIGHTON, MN DATE 24 NOV. 2014 PROJECT SCOPE: CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING GARAGE. TIE NEW SEPTIC INTO EXISTING LINE BETWEEN HOUSE AND STREET. PROVIDE DOMESTIC WATER LINE FROM EXISTING HOUSE TO ADU. PROVIDE NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND BACKUP GENERATOR, BACK FEED EXISTING HOUSE PANEL PROVIDE NEW PANEL IN GARAGE STORAGE AREA. PROVIDE NEW GAS LINE FROM EXISTING METER TO ADU. GENERAL NOTES: ALL CONTRACTORS MUST FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, ORDINANCES, BUILDING CODES, AND ANY REGULATIONS WHICH, IN ANY MANNER, AFFECT THOSE ENGAGED IN OR EMPLOYED ON THE WORK, OR THE MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT'S USED, OR WHICH - IN ANY WAY - AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF THE WORK. IF NOT SPECIFICALLY STATED ON THE PLANS, THE APPROPRIATE CODE SHALL GOVERN SIZES, QUALITIES, AND QUANTITIES OF ALL WORK. DRAWING INDEX: Al SITE PLAN A2 FOUNDATION PLAN A3 GARDEN LEVEL PLAN A4 STUDIO / GARAGE LEVEL PLAN AS PORTICO PLAN Ado ROOF / DECK PLAN Al EAST / WEST BUILDING SECTION AS EAST / WEST STAIR SECTION A9 NORTH / SOUTH BUILDING SECTION A10 NORTH / SOUTH STAIR SECTION A11 WEST ELEVATION Al2 SOUTH ELEVATION A13 EAST ELEVATION A14 NORTH ELEVATION Al5 DOOR *ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE A16 WINDOW SCHEDULE A11 ROOF PLAN ADDITIONS & TO THE: Pj-ic+ d GA�ENSIDE .�Al N 0 33 MOGREN contact: ED H WKS ORD contact:lMONICA saR ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV:ALTERATIONS SHEET OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA u s a contact: DON MARTIN contact ROGERTEN 3 2 7 EXISTING GARAGE FOUNDATION O FOUNDATION FLAN Scale: 1/41=1-01' 10' 4" UNEXCAVATED 5' 1 I/2" • S" CMU FND UJALL 1 C. &" CMU ON • 12" CMU FND WALL 0 UNEXCAVATED 9 1/2 4" CONC. SLAB WITH REINF INFLOOR RADIANT HEAT ON RIGID INSULATION ON COMPACTED SAND ll" 1' 9 1/2" / / O r m 9' 2 1/2" NOTES; 1. 12" CMU FOUNDATION WALL ON CONC GRADE BEAM CAP (FOOTING) OVER MICRO -PILING FOUNDATION SYSTEM. SEE STRUCTURAL. ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA r CC(C� (/x�l _<,AoX ,i contact :6 H ORD cell' 60491 ,�py�� i %� ' ./, ' �� GARDENSIDE j mAR r� w�� contact'DON MARTIN cell' 86 A H T' DATE: 25 MARCH 2O15 REV: SHEET A2 OF 17 SHEETS U contact c s OGER05TEN 6532 21 contact: MONICA OGREN cell' 3' 4" 1 10' 0" i 3' 0" RELOCATED RETAINING STONE 24' 2" • FOUNDATION WALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO STORM SEWER EXISTING GARAGE STORAGE 1'-1 3/4" (808.34) T.O. SLAB LOWER WINDOW SILL FOR CUSTOM SINK CABINET • • 5/8" GYP. BD. ON POLY VB ON 2x4 TREATED STUDS UNDER COUNTER REFRIG.• CUSTOM CABINET INFILL FOR EX'G. WINDOW OPENING* 2 BURNER ELECTRIC RANGE TOP T T -ET �—F 7 T UP '2R T/8 ENTRY EX'G. STAIR TO REMAIN SUP 12 O 11 80&.52 IT J GARDEN LEVEL o'-o' (acme) UP 15R J / T.O. SLAB • HANDRAIL tout. I PATIO STOOP E301.0 (c) 80&.2 GARDEN LEVEL PLAN Scale: 1/4" =11-0" NEW RETAINING WALL SEE SHEET A5 801.S8 75' EXISTING SPOT GRADE 813.8 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 814.8 ADDITIONS & TO THE: ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET ARRIA STILLWATER, E HOUSE MINNESOTA Ol GARDENSIDE . '� cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 saR AACH1\ E 1 DATE: 25 MARCH 2015 REV:ALTERATIONS SHEET A3 OF 17 SHEETS u s 1� contact: DON MARTIN cell: T contact:ROGER cell: DNS 12 R 0 EXISTING FLOOR DRAIN GARAGE 8-1° 1815.1ti T.O. SLAB REMOVE EXISTING TOPPING FROM CONCRETE PLANK, ADD MEMBRANE AND ADD SLOPED TOPPING TO EXISTING FLOOR DRAI1\n WITH IN -FLOOR RADIANT NEAT. T STUDIO / GARAGE PLAN Scale: 1/4" =1'-O" UP I x r J DN 15 R r STUDIO 9'-81/Jr" 5' O" (F( co F I 1I T.O. G'I PCRETE 11 0 10 UP • (4 m 9'-O 1/2" 9' 5" co ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA 6:ic+ d � GAIIDENSIDE . � act:D HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA OGREN cell: Ecell: 33 �� � s;��� contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET 4 OF 17 SHEETS u s GERTOMTEN contact:ROGER conEl 815.01 1" IATCN TO EXISTING GRADE 813.8 0 POWER POLE EXISTING CONC. APRON N UJ BITUI"INOUS TO S OPE/DRAIN TO S REET GARAGE SEE SNEET A4 T 801.0 11 2 8" PORTICO COVERED P KING 99" UN -CO ED PARKING 81r✓-.07 8 810.0 80833 5'1 809.0 CONC. SLAB FOR ELECT. GENERATOR 4 A/C OND. UNIT 801.58 807.58 9' 9" • NEW RETAINING WALL EXISTING SPOT GRADE PROPOSED SPOT GRADE SO2 RELOCATED LANDSCAPING STONES • NEUJ ELECT. PANEL 4 DISCONNECT SWITCH GEAR ADDITIONS OC. ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA ipp,:joirt _<, X ,t contact :6 H ORD cell' 60491 �i vh 4 ��� GARDENSIDE j mAR _f r� w�� contact'DON MARTIN cell' 86 A H �i DATE: 25 MARCH 2O15 REV:A5 SHEET OF 17 SHEETS U contact c s OGER05TEN 6532 a contact: MONICA OGREN cell' OPEN TO STUDIO 7LOLU ROOF DECK PLAN Scale_ 1/4" =1'-O" ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, MINNESOTA HSE i ldxa! n GARDENSIDE contact: ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 651-983-0491 cell: 651-770-3346 i j mAR y IWO.Wa bi. Ut ...1 A RCHNET 25MARCH 2O15 REV: SHEET A6 OF 17 SHEETS ■ . C © contact: DON MARTIN cell: 651-248-6795 contact: ROGER TOMTEN cell: 651-303-3275 12 v RETAIN OR REPLACE EXISTING CONC APRON IF NEEDED TO MATCH NEW CONC TOPPING ATTIC TRUSSES DESIGN BY SUPPLIER i\-•5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP.BD. ON POLY V.B. ON FULLY INSULATED ATTIC TRUSSES GARAGE NEW GONG TOPPING, SLOPED TO DRAIN WITH IN -FLOOR RADIANT HEAT EXISTING GONG. PLANK TO REMAIN GARAGE STORAGE • 5/8" GYP. BD. ON POLY VB ON 2x4 TREATED STUDS • FOUNDATION WALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO STORM SEWER • EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION TO REMAIN • EAST / WEST BUILDING SECTION Scale: 1/4" = ,n STUDIO GARDEN LEVEL • TYPICAL SLAB ON GRADE FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: FLOOR FINISH ON 4" CONC. SLAB W/ IN -FLOOR RADIANT HEAT 4 REINFORCING ON 2" RIGID INSULATION ON COMPACTED SAND /\, TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION: CEDAR SHINGLES ON VENTING STRIPS OR "CEDAR BREATHER" ON ICE 4 WATER SHIELD ON 3/4" CDX PLYWOOD ON TRUSSES (DESIGN BY SUPPLIER) SPRAY FOAM INSULATION TO R-50 POLY VAPOR BARRIER 4 5/8" GYP. BD. TYPICAL SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION: 1X6? T*G ROOF SHEATHING EXPOSED 4 PAINTED TYPICAL RAKE FASCIA CONSTRUCTION: 2X8 CEDAR 4 1X4 CEDAR DRIP, PAINTED • TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION: CEDAR SIDING ON 1540 FELT ON 1/2" 0S5 SHEATHING ON 2X6 FRAMING 6 16" O.G. WITH SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, POLY VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BD. • TYPICAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: FLOOR FINISH ON 2" GYPCRETE ON 3/4" T.G. SUBFLOOR, GLUED 4 SCREWED TO 12" FLOOR TRUSSES (DESIGN BY SUPPLIER) 1&" O.G. TYPICAL GARDEN LEVEL WALL CONSTRUCTION: 4" RIVARD STONE VENEER 304* FELT ON 2" RIGID INSUL. ON 1/2" 0S5 SHEATIHING ON 2Xe? FRAMING e 162" O.G. WITH SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, POLY VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BD. FINISH GRADE FOUNDATION SYSTEM, SEE STRUCTURAL ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: Pj-ic+ d .� GA�ENSIDE saR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET AI OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA u s a contact:ROGER cell: cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 LVL HEADER 1' O 12 a SUPPLIER 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYP.BD. ON POLY V.B. ON FULLY INSULATED ATTIC TRUSSES EXISTING CONC. PLANK TO REMAIN /8" GYP. BD. ON POLY VB ON 2x4 TREATED STUDS I\_. FOUNDATION WALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO STORM SEWER EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION TO REMAIN EAST / WEST STAIR SECTION Scale: 1/4" = 12 �4 10" .EXISTING STEEL STAIR TO REMAIN GARAGE STORAGE TYPICAL EAVE FASCIA CONSTRUCTION: 1X& CEDAR FASCIA ON 2X4 SUBFASCIA PAINTED TYPICAL SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION: 1X6 T*G ROOF SHEATHING EXPOSED 4 PAINTED, EXPOSED CEDAR 2xe, RAFTERS, PAINTED • STUDIO STAIR CONSTRUCTION: STONE TREADS 4 RISERS ON 3/4" T.*G. SUBFLOOR, GLUED 4 SCREWED TO STRINGERS. .TYPICAL GARDEN LEVEL WALL CONSTRUCTION: 4" RIVARD STONE VENEER 304* FELT ON 2" RIGID INSUL. ON 1/2" 06E3 51-1EAT1-1ING ON 2Xe? FRAMING e 1&" O.G. WITI-I SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, POLY VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BD. -. FOUNDATION SYSTEM, SEE STRUCTURAL ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: Pj-ic+ d .� GA�ENSIDE saR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET AS OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA u s a contact:ROGER cell: cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 SOUTH ROOF DECK: 2X& CEDAR DECKING ON TRTD. SLEEPERS ON ROOF MEMBRANE SLOPED TO DRAIN ON 3/4" T4G SHEATHING ON 2X8 JOISTS lb" O.G. WITH 3/4" }BEAD BOARD CLG. 30" WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL TREATED BEAM • 12 87 TREATED &X& POST WITH 1X WRAP RIVARD STONE BASE 4 GAP 6661166666 6 666 6666 6666666/66 6666666666 6666666 6 PORTICO NORTI-W / SOUT-4 BUILDING SECTION Scale: 1/4" = r-o ATTIC ACCESS ATTIC TRUSSES DESIGN BY SUPPLIER MIN -*EXISTING CONC. PLANK TO REMAIN S/8" GYP. BD. ON POLY VS ON 2x4 TREATED STUDS GARAGE STORAGE T • FOUNDATION WALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO STORM SEWER • EXISTING STONE FOUNDATION TO REMAIN o° 0 k•—• 30" WROUGHT IRON GUARDRAIL NORTH BALCONY: 2Xb CEDAR DECKING ON TRTD.12X8 JOISTS ON 4X4 BRACKET ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: �+ d .� GA�ENSIDE saR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET AS OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA u s a contact:ROGER cell: cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 STAIR STUDIO 12 4,441 •Ns 3/4 BATI- 20 12 8 GARDEN LEVEL cYl ENTRY NORTI-I / 5OUTI-4 STAIR SECTION Scale: 1/4" =1'-0" • TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION: CEDAR SHINGLES ON VENTING STRIPS OR "CEDAR BREATHER" ON ICE 4 WATER SHIELD ON 3/4" CDX PLYWOOD ON TRUSSES (DESIGN BY SUPPLIER) SPRAY FOAM INSULATION TO R-50 POLY VAPOR BARRIER (IF REQ'D) 4 5/8" GYP. BD. • TYPICAL EAVE FASCIA CONSTRUCTION: 1Xe? CEDAR FASCIA ON 2X4 5U5FASCIA PAINTED • STAINED GLASS CEILING DOME BACK LIT WITH SOLA-TUBE • TYPICAL WALL CONSTRUCTION: CEDAR SIDING ON 150 FELT ON 1/2" 055 SHEATHING ON 2X& FRAMING ' 1&" O.C. WITH SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, POLY VAPOR BARRIER 4 1/2" GYP. BD. • TYPICAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: FLOOR FINISH ON 2" GYP-CRETE ON 3/4" T.*G. SUBFLOOR, GLUED 4 SCREWED TO 12" FLOOR TRUSSES (DESIGN BY SUPPLIER)1&" O.C. • NEW SIDEWALK TO MATCH EXISTING • FOUNDATION SYSTEM, SEE STRUCTURAL ADDITIONS & TO THE: Pj-ic+ d . GA�ENSIDE saR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV:ALTERATIONS SHEET Al OF 17 O SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA u s a contact:ROGER cell: cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 o UJEST ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = • CEDAR SHINGLES lx& HEAD TRIM -.lx& * lx3 FASCIA lx& FRIEZE l x�o JAMS TRIM • WROUGHT IRON BALCONY FENCE 1-10RIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXPOSURE • 1x& CORNER TRIM • (ox(o POST U)/ lx UJRAP VERTICAL BEAD BOARD STONE CAP STONE POST SASE FINISH GRADE ADDITIONS & TO THE: 6:iic+ d GA�ENSIDE .� cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA OGREN cell: 33 saR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV:ALTERATIONS SHEET A11 OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA u s a contact:ROGERTOMTEN cell: noninnonn SOUTI-I ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = r-0 CEDAR SHINGLES • lx& lx3 FASCIA lx12 FRIEZE • lx& JAMB TRIM • lxl2 CORNER BD. MTL. CAP FLASHING OVER ix(' HORIZ. TRIM BD. HORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXPOSURE MTL. CAP FLASHING ON 2x SILL CAP CEDAR SHINGLES VERTICAL BEAD BOARD WOOD BRACKET i + STONE VENEER STONE JAMB it SILL CONC. STOOP FINISH GRADE ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: �+ d GA�ENSIDE � cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA OGREN cell: 33 s; aR ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET Al2 OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA us a contact: DON MARTIN cell: T contact:ROGERTOMTEN cell: CEDAR SHINGLES • 1x3 RAKE FASCIA CEDAR SNAKES WROUGHT IRON CAP DETAIL METAL ROOFING • lx& lx3 FASCIA Ix12 FRIEZE 80ARD UJINDOUJ HOOD 1-I0RIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. 1x3 CORNER 80ARD • lx12 CORNER 50ARD • WINDOW HOOD ENTRY ROOF RELOCATED RETAINING STONES CONCRETE STOOP FINISH GRADE EAST ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: �+ � GA�ENSIDE s; aR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET , �3 OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA us a contact:ROGER cell: cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 CEDAR SHINGLES • 1xS RAKE FASCIA OPERA BALCONY POST 4 BRACKET + WROUGHT IRON BALCONY RAIL METAL FLASHING OVER 1x12 HORIZONTAL TRIM BD. NORIZ. LAP CEDAR SIDING, 4" EXP. OPERA BALCONY BRACKET • lxS CORNER BOARD • 1x& TRIM BOARD VERTICAL BEAD BOARD -. FINISH GRADE NORTI-I ELEVATION Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: �+ d � GA�ENSIDE s; aR contact: DON MARTIN cell: T ARCHNET 25 MADATE: RCH 2O15 REV: SHEET 414 OF 17 SHEETS ANJJERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA us a contact:ROGER cell: cell:act:ED HAWKSFORD contact: MONICA MOGREN cell: 33 DOOR SCHEDULE # ROOM NAME DOOR FRAME I-IARDUJARE CROUP NOTES SIZE TYPE MATL FINISH TYPE MATL. FINISH STORAGE 3'0' x&'4"+/- EX'G. W. PNT. - W. SLNT. # - 2 ENTRY (2)3-3"xe'-2" SWING WD/SRZ. - - W. PNT. # SALV. DOORS SY OWNER 3 GARDEN LVL. (2)2-211x8'-0" POCKET WD. SLNT. - MIL. - # SALV. DOORS SY OWNER 4) < GARDEN LVL. 2-011x0-8" SWING W. SLNT. - W. SLNT. # - GARDEN LVL. 2-01x(o'-8" SWINGWD.SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # - (c.5 6 KITCHENETTE EXG. SWING WD. SLNT. - W. SLNT. # SALV. DOOR SY OWNER .1) GARAGE 11-O"xl(o-O" O.H. W. SLNT. - W. SLNT. # INSULATED 8 GARAGE 31-O"x1'-O" SWING W. SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # INSULATED 9 ATTIC ACCESS 31-O"x1'-O" SWING W. SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # - 10 STAIR 31-O"x1'-O" SWING W. SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # - ( II 3/4 SATH 31-O"x1'-O" SWING W. SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # - ) 2) SOUTH DECK 31-01x1'-O" SWING W. SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # INSULATED 13 NORTH SALLY. (2)3'-O"xl'-O" SWING W. SLNT. - WD. SLNT. # INSULATED ROOT" I FINISH SCHEDULE ROOM NAME WALL MATL. WALL FINISH FLOOR MAIL. FLOOR FIN. $ASE CLG. MAIL. CLG. FIN. CLG. HT. NOTES EXG. GARAGE STOR. EXG. EXG. EX'G. EXG. - EXG. EXG. 0'-&" +/- - ENTRY GYP.SD. PLASTER CONC. TILE TILE GYP.BD. TEXT./PNT. 8'-0" - GARDEN LEVEL GYP.SD. PLASTER CONC. TILE TILE GYP.BD. TEXT./PNT. 8'-0' - KITCHENETTE GYP.SD. PLASTER CONC. TILE TILE GYP.BD. TEXT./PNT. 8'-&" - GARAGE GYP.SD. WD./PNT. CONC. SEAL'NT. - GYP.BD. PNT. 8'-O - ATTIC ACCESS GYP.SD. PNT. W. SEAL'NT. WED. GYP.BD. PNT. VARIES - 3/4 SA -TN GYP.SD. PLSTR/TILE GYPCRETE TILE TILE GYP.SD. TEXT./PNT. VARIES 1 STUDIO GYP.SD. PLASTER GYPCRETE W. WD. GYP.SD. TEXT./PNT. VARIES - STAIR GYiP.SD. TILE W. STONE STONE GYP.SD. TEXT./PNT. VARIES - ATTIC GYP.SD. PNT. WD. SEAL'NT. WD. GYP.SD. PNT. VARIES - PORTICO W. SHTHG. WD. SIDING ASPHALT - - BEAD SD. PNT. 8'-&" +/- - NOTES: 1. WITH STAINED GLASS CEILING DOME. ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA r CC1)/ (/x�l _<,X,t contact :6 H ORD cell' 60491 j.�� 1 , ►1'� GA�ENsroE •� R r�w�� contact'DON MARTIN cell' 86 A RC H N E T' DATE: 25 MARCH 2O15 REV: SHEET Al5 OF 17 SHEETS contact c s OGER05TEN 6532 contact: MONICA OGREN cell' 3'O° O N 3'11" 4' 51/4' EXISTING WINDOW, PROVIDED BY OWNER Kam) PICTURE UNIT TO RECEIVE STAINED GLASS (2 W x 94" T.) ON INTERIOR. VERIFY SIZE OF STAINED GLASS UNITS PRIOR TO SETTING EXACT WINDOW UNIT SIZE. Kc) PICTURE UNIT TO RECEIVE STAINED GLASS (401'W x 94" T.) ON INTERIOR. VERIFY SIZE OF STAINED GLASS UNITS PRIOR TO SETTING EXACT WINDOW UNIT SIZE PICTURE UNIT : (E) MULLED PICTURE UNIT TO RECEIVE STAINED GLASS ON INTERIOR. VERIFY SIZE OF STAINED GLASS UNITS PRIOR TO SETTING EXACT WINDOW UNIT SIZE. CO 2' S 1/4' PICTURE UNIT : PICTURE UNIT : DOUBLE HUNG UNIT : KI 4' 0" (4 4' 0" PICTURE UNIT : PICTURE UNIT : PICTURE UNIT : N N m /M\ o PICTURE UNIT : PICTURE UNIT : 3' 111' 1 3'11" 2' O" NN WINDOW TYPES MARVIN WOOD ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG MAGNUM; DOUBLE HUNG 4 PICTURE UNITS; 4 9/1(0" JAMB 1 5/S" SASH THICKNESS BARE TREATED WOOD, INT. PRIMED, EXTERIOR UNIT SIZED BY ROUGH OPENING GLAZING; 3/4' LOW E II, ARGON U-FACTOR; 0.29 PICTURE UNIT : KP% PICTURE UNIT TO RECEIVE STAINED GLASS (40"W. x 94' T.) ON INTERIOR. VERIFY SIZE OF STAINED GLASS UNITS PRIOR TO SETTING EXACT WINDOW UNIT SIZE. COTTAGE STYLE, DOUBLE HUNG UNIT : SIMULATED DIVIDED LIGHT WITH SPACER BAR, UPPER SASH ONLY ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA dxd .4 cotact:EDORD 19630491 ..i GARDENSIDE �� � ��� ARCHNET 25MARCH2O15 REV: SHEET OF 17 SHEETS u r J aAl6s contact: DON c6512 ARTIcontact: ROGER cell:651303-3205TEN contact: MONICAGREN l651-7 3346 ROOF DECK ROOF PLAN Scale: 1/S = 1'-C • ENTRY CANOPY • SKYLIGHT • METAL ROOFING • CEDAR SHINGLE ROOFING • GUTTER ALTERATIONS TO THE: ANDERSON 119 WEST CHESTNUT STREET CARRIAGE STILLWATER, HOUSE MINNESOTA e/1.0000,4 opc( � � celltact:6�9 304910RD QJ , GARDENSIDE wY.Gira .U.,o. `'R"�_```Ea25MARCH2015 REV: SHEET 411 OFI7SHEETS U s contact' cell: 65OGER3T05 TEN contact: MONICA 03346GREN cell: contact: 651-2 86795 STRUCTURAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS: 5UILDING CODES A. LATEST EDITION OF MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE AND IBC. B. MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ALL PREVAILING CODES. DESIGN LIVE LOADS GROUND SNOW LOAD: 50 PSF ROOF SNOW LOAD: 35 PSF* FLOOR (RESIDENTIAL): 40 PSF WIND: 90 MPH, EXPOSURE C SEISMIC: DESIGN CATEGORY "A" OTHERS: PER BUILDING CODE PLUS SNOW BUILDUP IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUILDING CODE. PILING AND FOUNDATIONS A. MINIMUM FROST COVER FROM GRADE TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING IS 42 INCHES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (60" IN UNHEATED AREAS). B. DESIGN NET BEARING CAPACITY FOR MICROPILE ANCHORS AS SHOWN ON PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ANCHORS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS TO ACHIEVE REQUIRED CAPACITY. C. FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR VALUES (ASTM D698) [IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT]: FROST FOUNDATION BACKFILL: 95% D. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, IN AREAS WHERE OVEREXCAVATION IS REQUIRED, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE OVERSIZED A DISTANCE OF ONE FOOT BEYOND THE FOOTING EDGES FOR EACH FOOT OF EXTRA DEPTH. E. ALL PILES SHALL BE CENTERED ON GRID LINES AND PILE CAPS AND GRADE BEAMS SHALL BE CENTERED ON PILES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MICROPILES A. INSTALLATION OF MICROPILES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IBC OR MANUFACTURER, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. B. INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 YEARS OF MICROPILE INSTALLATION EXPERIENCE. MICROPILE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING INSTALLATION DRILLING DURATION AND OBSERVATIONS, DESIGN LOADS, UNUSUAL INSTALLATION BEHAVIOR AND CONDITIONS, ANY DEVIATIONS, GROUT PRESSURE AS APPLICABLE, GROUT QUANTITY, PILE MATERAILS AND DIMENSIONS AND ANY TEST REQUIRED AND ANALYSIS. CAST —IN —PLACE —CONCRETE A. DESIGN CODE: "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE" (ACI 318). B. CONCRETE (F'C IS 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE): FOOTINGS: INTERIOR SLABS ON GRADE: WALLS, GRADE BEAMS: ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE:: CORE AND BOND BEAM FILL: f'c=3000 PSI, 4" SLUMP, 1Y2" MAX. AGR. f'c=3500 PSI, 4" SLUMP, 3/4" MAX. AGR. f'c=3500 PSI, 4" SLUMP, 3/4" MAX. AGR. f'c=4500 PSI, 4" SLUMP, 3/4" MAX. AGR. f'c=3000 PSI, 6" SLUMP, 3/8" MAX. AGR. ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED 5 TO 7% (+/— 1%) BY VOLUME. C. REINFORCING STEEL: (NEW, DEFORMED AND CLEAN) ASTM A185 FOR WELDED WIRE FABRIC. ASTM A615 GRADE 60, GRADE 40 FOR STIRRUPS AND TIES. D. SEE "CONCRETE PROTECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT" SCHEDULE FOR MINIMUM COVER. E. REINFORCING SPLICES SHALL BE THE GREATER OF 40 BAR DIAMETERS OR 24" U.N.O. F. LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF ALL PENETRATIONS, HOLES, SLEEVES, ETC. SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ALL TRADES. G. FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL CHAIRS, TIES, AND OTHER ACCESSORIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE (CRSI) "MANUAL OF STD. PRACTICE" H. CONSOLIDATE ALL CONCRETE BY VIBRATING OR PUDDLING. I. ALL CONCRETE AND MASONRY CONSTRUCTION DURING HOT OR COLD WEATHER SHALL COMPLY WITH ACI 305R "HOT WEATHER CONCRETING" OR ACI 306R "COLD WEATHER CONCRETING" RESPECTIVELY. 3'-4" 9'-4" 4' —0" 1'— N� 1-6I WF20J WF20 v N J 8'-4" c0 4 r. s L �— c0 6" — — 4'— IN L WF20 _ c0 °° 4" CONCRETE SLAB WITH #5 AT 12" OC EACH WAY BOTTOM STEEL FINISH FLOOR EL= VERIFY WITH ARCH. N 1— N c0 WF20 6.-5h„ 6'-11" 2, 31 ,-6" ao M o 7' —3". I 4 1 1 1 l0 13 ' I� F• J WF20 41) ° 0 0 CO N 2'-6" 7'-3" —8" s 18'-4" FOUNDATION PLAN •I frf 7I PROVIDE SIMPSON ST18 OR HTS 20 STRAPS FROM ROOF BEAMS TO ROOF TRUSSES & TOP R TO ROOF TRUSSES (3)14 "x9)" LVL (3)1-Y x9J 7 Il VL II 1 / \ / I \ \/ I \/ 1/4"=1'—O" N ATTACH FLOOR TRUSSES TO EXIST. PRECAST/WALL W/ L6x4x-X(LLV) W/ %"0 EPDXY BOLTS 0 32" 0.C. PROVIDE SIMPSON ST18 OR HTS 20 STRAPS FROM ROOF BEAMS TO ROOF TRUSSES & TOP R TO ROOF TRUSSES ROOF FRAMING PLAN 1/4"=1'-0" PLAN MICROPILE ANCHORS • 14K VERT. CAPACITY 1.5K ULT. HORIZ. CAPACITY (FS=2.0) MIRCOPILE SHALL EXTEND 5'-0" MIN. INTO OUTWASH PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROVIDED BY S.E.H. DATED 12-29-2014 FOOTING SCHEDULE MK SIZE REINFORCING WF20 2'-0"x1'-4" (3) #5 T&B GENERAL FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR CMU WALL LOCATIONS, FLOOR SLOPES, DRAINS AND ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS AND SECTIONS. 2. FOR GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS SEE S1. 3. ALL PILES SHALL BE CENTERED ON GRIDS AND PILE CAPS AND GRADE BEAMS SHALL BE CENTERED PILES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. BOTTOM GRADE BEAM REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE SPLICED OVER PILE CAPS AND TOP GRADE BEAM REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE SPLICED AT THE MIDSPAN OF BEAMS. 5. TOP OF WALL STEPS ARE INDICATED THUS: TF —WS TOP OF PILE CAP STEPS ARE INDICATED THUS: TPrTF.t—S LAP ALL HORIZ BARS 40 BAR DIAMETERS. TYP AT ALL WALL AND PILE CAP STEPS. FIELD VERIFY ALL STEP LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH SITE TOPOGRAPHY AND CONTRACTOR. 6. FOR CORNER AND INTERSECTIONS REINFORCEMENT DETAILS SEE 1/S1. 7. MICROPILE SIZE AND LENGTH SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO ACHIEVE A NET DESIGN CAPACITY AS SHOWN ABOVE. ANCHOR SHALL BE CAPPED WITH 3/4"x6"x8" PLATE MINIMUM. a a a a ° O ° Q a a 0 —° a a as a .13a ° fa $ INTERSECTION CORNER 0 SPLICE BAR SAME SIZE AS HORIZ. STEEL THUS:I1,-0" 3'-0" HORIZ. STEEL SPLICE BAR SAME SIZE AS HORIZ. STEEL THUS: 3'-0" 3'-0" HORIZ. STEEL GRADE BEAM REINF. DETAIL 3/4"=1'-0" n 4 4 a II II SECTION a ° ° CONCRETE SLAB, SEE PLAN TOP OF WALL EL.=SEE PLAN • 2" BEAD BOARD UNDER SLAB 8" CONCRETE WALL WITH #5 AT 24" OC EACH WAY OR 8" CMU W/ #5 48" O.C. W/ BOND BEAM W/ (2)#5 CONT. 0 TOP COURSE TOP OF FOOTING 4_ EL.=SEE PLAN FOOTING AND REINFORCING, SEE PLAN AND SCHEDULE MICROPILE, SEE PLAN 3/4"=1'-0" r DUFFY ENGINEERING AND ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTIN; 4L - CIVIL - SINVEYING MECHANICAL - ELECTRICAL 350 Highway 10 South Saint Cloud, MN 56304 Phone: (320) 259-6575 Fax: (320) 259-6991 `Email: mail@duffyeng.com J I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly Licensed ENGINEER under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA RYAN 'JGSEAVERT 02-12-15 41971 Date License No. J r vi z 0 V) w 0 0 a) 0 0 0 z J (%) Z Q Q 1- Z n Lil LLI uJ0_00 O z Z ZZQ OQrrnn Q Q L Et 0 0 LLJ Z Z D O O LLJ O O LU 0 L_ Et (!) J ARCHNET USA J Project No • 15033 Date• 02-12-15 Drown by• GLW Checked by• TWD J PLAN J S 1 oF 1