Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-10 CPC Packet - Amendedi 1 1 \i'a tec THE IIRTMPLA CE OF MIENESOTA AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North June 10, 2015 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of April 8, 2015 regular meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS - The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item. 2. Case No. 2015-09: Special Use permit for new restaurant to be located at 317 Main St S. Larry Cramer, Owner. Benjamin Leske, Applicant. 3. Case No. 2015-10: Variance for a 2' encroachment into the Front Yard Setback for a front porch. Located at 1108 5th St S. Mike Estes, Owner and Applicant 4. Case No. 2015-11: Special Use Permit for development of a one story credit union with drive through banking services. Located at 2020 Washington Ave S. William Hickey, Applicant representing Ideal Credit Union. 5. Case No. 2015-12: Seasonal Vending Permit to operate a produce stand at 1672 Greely St S. Steve Abbott, Owner, Phillip Westby, Applicant 6. Case No. 2015-13: Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) to various City Code Sections regarding design review and Design Review Permitting, to include the removal of Design Review Permits for certain signage in the West Stillwater Business Park District 7. Case No. 2015-14: Consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to the City of Stillwater's 2008 Comprehensive Plan specifically to the City's Park Plan and the Transportation Plan to incorporate a Master Trails Plan into the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as required by the release of a Metropolitan Council System. — To be distributed Friday June 5, 2015 VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS 8. Discussion of Front Yard Parking VIII. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION IX. ADJOURNMENT ate TOE 1I1TN►LACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES April 8, 2015 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Vice Chairman Hansen called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Present: Vice Chairman Hansen, Commissioners Collins, Hade, Kelly, Lauer, Siess, Council Representative Junker Absent: Chairman Kocon, Commissioner Fletcher and Middleton Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Commissioner Lauer, seconded by Commissioner Collins, to approve the March 11, 2015 meeting minutes. All in favor, 6-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. V/2015-7. Request for a variance to move house door from current location on side of house, and create new doorway facing front of house located at 208 Linden Street West. Shane and Aimee Christenson, owner. City Planner Wittman explained that the applicants have requested a 20' front yard setback variance for the creation of a new landing and set of stairs on the front side of their non -conforming home. The existing stairway and entrance would be abandoned to create a front entry facing the street rather than facing a driveway that is not part of their property. Staff recommends approval with four conditions. Vice Chairman Hansen opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner Collins, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to approve the variance for Case No. V/2015-7, a 20' variance to the front yard setback for creation of a new doorway at 208 Linden Street West, with the following conditions: a. Plans shall be substantially similar to those on file with the Community Development Department's Case No. 2015-7. b. A building permit for the construction of the new southern entrance shall be reviewed and approved prior to exterior alterations. Planning Commission April 8, 2015 c. The eastern entrance, deck, landing and stairs shall be removed prior to receiving a final inspection on the southern entrance, landing and stairs. d. Major exterior modifications to the variance permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission per Section 31-204, Subd. 7. All in favor, 6-0. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council Representative Junker informed the Commission that last night, the Council heard the appeal regarding the Kari Garratt property at 1015 3rd Avenue South. The Council unanimously approved the front yard setback variance which the Planning Commission had recommended for denial. Commissioner Siess asked why the variance was approved. Council Representative Junker summarized that the Council felt if the garage addition were built on the north, as one of the recommended alternatives, the slope, grade, and impact on view -sheds would be significant. If built on the south side, it would have been constructed over a portion of the sewer. When built as requested with the variance, the driveway will come in a little further south and circle more into the yard space and existing concrete will be removed, so aesthetically, it will make the house look more appealing. Commissioner Siess said she believed the third garage stall was a "want" rather than a "need" - the applicant could still have redone the area with the two car garage. The variance was for the entire garage addition, not just a portion of it. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Hade, to adjourn the meeting at 7:16 p.m. All in favor, 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink Recording Secretary Page 2 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 10, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-9 APPLICANT: Benjamin Leske, representing Stilly Dogs, Larry Cramer, property owner REQUEST: Request for a Special Use Permit for a restaurant with pass through window to be located at 317 Main Street South, Suite 9 ZONING: CBD-Central Business District COMP PLAN: DMU-Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit for a restaurant with a pass through window to be located at 317 Main Street South, Suite 9. The unit is located on the eastern side of the building, facing Water Street. The restaurant would be similar to Stilly Dog's existing business model, selling concession -style hotdogs and non- alcoholic beverages with no sit down service or indoor seating. No outdoor seating is proposed. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND REGULATIONS Section 31-325 indicates eating establishments in the Central Business District require a Special Use Permit. Section 31-207 establishes the review standards for Special Use Permits: The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district, if it is found compatible with surrounding uses. In review of the request with City staff, the following item was determined to be an item of concern: • Parking: The proposed use will take occupy the location formerly used as a barber shop which had two chairs. Three parking spaces per chair were required. The approximately 284 square foot restaurant requires two parking spaces. As such, the proposed change of use is found to have met the off-street parking provisions. • Trash: The applicant has not indicated a plan for waste management. However, trash receptacles have not been determined to be a nuisance in this location. • Exterior changes: Section 31-319 of the Stillwater City Code requires that the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) conduct a design review on exterior changes, signage and waste receptacle. While the applicant indicated there would be no exterior changes or signs installed, the floor plan indicates the retrofit of an existing window opening for a pass through service window. If the pass through window is permitted by Special Use Permit, then the applicant will need to obtain a Design Review Permit by the HPC prior to any exterior changes and/or the installation of any exterior signage. Comprehensive Plan Chapter 6, Local Economy, indicates an objective of supporting business expansion. The proposed eating establishment with pass -through window are not contradictory to the Comprehensive Plan. This use is consistent with the Future Land Use Map identifying this property as having commercial use in 2030. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed or use and/or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. While the eating establishment will not be nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community if conditions addressing the aforementioned concerns are met, there is concern for the creation of a pass through window onto the sidewalk adjacent to the building and Water Street. As walk-up traffic increases, there is great concern for obstruction of the sidewalk and potential pedestrian conflicts in this area. This can be seen in other parts of the downtown where pass -through windows have been installed. In discussions with Public Works staff, the pass through would be considered to be a nuisance and detrimental to the public welfare. ALTERNATIVES, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The Commission has the following options: CPC 6/10/2015 (SUP/2015-9) 317 Main Street South Page 2 of 3 1. Determine that the proposed restaurant with Water Street pass through window is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Special Use Permits with or without conditions. If the Commission would like to approve the Case No. 2015-9 with conditions, staff would recommend the following: a. All existing and future trash receptacles shall be stored inside the building or in the proposed trash enclosure at all times with the exception of the day of trash collection. b. Any exterior changes, including the installation of a pass through window and signage, shall receive a HPC issued Design Review Permit. Conditions of the Design Review Permit shall be incorporated into this Special Use Permit by reference. c. Plans and the use will need to be approved by the engineering, fire and building officials before the issuance of a building permit. d. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. 2. Determine that portions of the proposed restaurant with Water Street pass through window are consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and approve in part, with or without conditions. 3. Determine that the proposed restaurant with Water Street pass through window is not consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and deny the Special Use Permit. 4. Table the application requesting more information be brought back before the Commission at their July 8, 2015 meeting. Staff finds the proposed eating establishment is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions, the Comprehensive Plan and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or become a nuisance. Therefore staff would recommend approval with the aforementioned conditions. However, staff find the Water Street pass through window may be considered a nuisance and detrimental to the public welfare. Therefore, staff would not recommend approve of a Water Street pass through window. If the pass through window was proposed to be located on the south portion of the rental unit, next to the entrance, staff would find the proposed pass through window consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions, the Comprehensive Plan and to not be detrimental to the public welfare or become a nuisance. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Floor Plans (3 pages) CPC 6/10/2015 (SUP/2015-9) 317 Main Street South Page 3 of 3 CPI - Spa. pe4Ce(z- i P• 1 '4 .5i-Jt-L)/ 3 pi -ACE yiNif, 1•1 Nsf- /2(2-ef 14 tri-- °(.7 5-itAritg .11 Oooa--- srwr 02(2" 2. 1370(2- sANpu*4) fg4911-6 9q7k49 8' coo- c s 91-Ef-- 12,A 5S 114 t'uc-,--14 Cid, I 'JP C.vd L/ A T� 3 Fit Act exk.-foer gf1y rty4' a— AtPP RRiJ NE `a "- l Lr piex 5eri 1-1-y Po 6-3. Xf $ rr'U" G- po_tz4_. kc 4c fit... uvPnl boo Co r✓ pcz, 1-1 ;(wL PR (0' rgii 1/ilk c0_,EL,„,3 q rokle GNiczka- () (141 Ash.. �, x t-f W i L.!_. °,. ?1rJ - CI? 5)r'D Ar92 P( 9 /J t rJ ST -L- ^ryllo(s co r! toiA) 57-P,W i) Ago PrL PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: June 10, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-10 APPLICANT: Mike and Lorilee Estes, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of 2' Front Yard Setback variance for a front porch addition to the structure located at 1108 5th Street South ZONING: RB: One Family COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR: Low/Medium Density PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicants have applied for a 2' Front Yard Setback variance for the addition of a front porch onto the residence located at 1108 5th Street South. If approved, the house would be located 18' from the front (east) property line. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS The purpose of the variance is to "...allow variation from the strict application of the terms of the zoning code where the literal enforcement...would cause practical difficulties for the landowner." In addition to the requirements, below, Section 31-208 indicates "[n]onconforming uses or neighboring lands, structures or buildings in the same district or other districts may not be considered grounds for issuance of a variance" and "...a previous variance must not be considered to have set a precedent for the granting of further variances. Each case must be considered on its merits." The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. The general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code is to regulate and restrict use of land for the protection of public health, safety and welfare. The purpose a front yard setback is to maintain an open, unoccupied and uniform space for aesthetic and environmental benefits. If approved, the variance would reduce the front yard of the property. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. No application elements are contradictory to the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. "Practical difficulties," as use in connection with the granting of a variance, means that all of the following must be found to apply: The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls; A front porch on the structure of property is reasonable and encouraged. The property owner could add a 6.1' porch onto the home to remain in compliance with the provisions of the zoning district. It has been indicated, however, the additional 2' of porch space would be more aesthetically pleasing and functional. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the landowner; and There are no particular circumstances unique to the property as the existing home meets the Front Yard Setback provisions. It is the preference of the property owner to construct an 8' porch, not in conformance with the zoning regulations. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The essential character of the neighborhood will not be significantly altered by the granting of this variance however the home will be situated closer to the street than either of the structures directly adjacent to this residences. ALTERNATIVES, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the variance, with or without conditions. The Planning Commission may impose conditions in the granting of a variance. A condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. If the Commission were to find practical difficulties do exist for the property owner, staff would recommend the following conditions: • Plans shall be substantially similar to those on file with the Community Development Department's Case No. 2015-10; and • A building permit, or an amendment to an existing building permit, shall be reviewed and approved prior to exterior alterations; and • Major exterior modifications to the variance permit request shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as per Section 31-204, Subd. 7. findings practical difficulties have not been established and deny the 2. Make the variance. 3. Table the CPC 6-10-2015 (2015-10) 1108 5th Street South. Page 2 of 3 application and request additional information. Staff finds practical difficulties do not exist as zoning regulations may be able to be met with other reasonable alternatives and there is no uniqueness to the property necessitating the variance. Therefore, staff recommends denial of a 2' variance to the Front Yard Setback for the addition of a front porch. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative Request Certificate of Survey Front House Elevation Photo Porch Plans CPC 6-10-2015 (2015-10) 1108 5th Street South. Page 3 of 3 1007 1015 O '• 1 1F` "� 0 Stj11vater 1016 - i I J 1,021^ 1 0 ` r 116,1. 319 I Q. a • t -',7 p s�,� '� i i The Birthplace of Minnesota Site Location W E S 0 80 160 320 Feet 1• ,hc� ` LLI Y 1111` ,, sue'•'-1116 CO • "K- t .., .� �- = _-._._ a, , +w _ r^ VJ 1108 5th Street South Parcel Boundaries + «—Municipal Boundary 1)23' , 124 :, i • 112'3J ..i!" i ce - -•l.. -� 120 1206 1206 1205 ii -- . 1209 1212 General Site Location 4 • 1212 �f 1213 1216 L.L __ r•• i L. �. - ...a..� o L a imoi:v ► _■ ®, q r,r r , 122s 1'213 T. O •-.,_- .� .Y �' ,4- 12241 1 u■ra s ` ,�%��►2 �.■�-.. ._ o '. au �r'�11 o �rry: •° 1 • �l, `%III i J, Pi • y I :1 --o , no o ,�, . MARSH STRE T 1 -•� - �, , 130 " " 1302, i t' 1 1304 1303 i �► ii1 I - ® to AS 41 1300 s p 0 1 1312 9 PLEA FOR A VARIANCE AT 1108 5th ST SOUTH, STILLWATER We moved to our home at 1108 5th Street South in Stillwater in 1997. At that time it was a small house of approximately 1000 square feet. In 2001 we built on an addition. The front of the remodel was built on the original foundation, it was not moved forward. The original house had a porch which we intended to replace, but our finances ran short and we were not able to replace the porch until now. Building a porch will make the house look less like a big ugly box (please see attached photo). Our neighbors are quite excited for us to make the addition as they are tired of looking at our big ugly box. Once we know whether we will be allowed to build a porch, we will also be putting new siding onto the house, which our neighbors were also quite excited to hear. Currently in the front of the house we have six feet one inch to bring us 20 feet from the property line. Our plea is for a variance of 23 inches so we may build a functional porch, instead of a porch for aesthetic value only. We would like room to have the porch wrap around the side of the house, much like the homes built up the street. Please see the plans provided. A wrapped porch will also take away the boxed look of our house and will make it look more in character with our neighborhood. We would like to state that if our request for a variance is granted our house, with the porch, will remain further back from the street than several houses in our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Mike and Lorilee Estes 1108 5th St South Stillwater, MN 55082 612-916-7429 (Mike) Note: "A 0 MH Indicates an existing sanitary sewer Manhole located as shown. This Manhole has active sewer lines running from Sough to North and into the Manhole from the West. The exact location of the East-West line not known by Stack Land Surveying. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEIL BARRETT M. STACK STILLWATER, MINN. 55082 MINNESOTA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR Tel. No. 439-5630 is SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR: Michael M. Estes and Lorilee Arrigoni�-Estes, 1108 5th St. So., Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 DESCRIPTION1 As Supplied: (Copy of Mortgage Assignment dated March 13, 2003) Lot 2, Except the North 16 2/3 feet thereof, and also 311 of Lot 3, Block 2, Marsh's Addition to Stillwater. (Wash. Co., ;.Minnesota) Notes: Orientation of this bearing system is an assumed datum. "--" o Indicates a 1/2" I.D. Iron Pipe Monument in place marked "STACK LS 13774". • Indicates monument found in place as noted. "M." Indicates field measured value. "R." Indicate plat record value. Offsets shown to existing structures are measured to the outside building wall lines, unless shown or noted otherwise.. Any projections from said wall lines such as eaves, sills, steps, etc., will impact indicated offsets accordingly. "a" Indicates surface location of cast iron manhole covers as located in June of 2008. The underground location of any sewer mains between or away from these manholes or from the 4' x 5' Storm Sewer Catch Basin shown hereon, is not known by Stack Land Surveying. No described easements defining these utilities were supplied to Stack Land Surveying defining described easement locatio:ls or easement right of way widths. Refer this matter to an attorney for an opinion on what steps, if any that may be required to address this matter. Underground or overhead, public or private utilites, on or a1jacent the parcel, were not located in conjunction with this survey, unless shown otherwise. 21 /d' VA/Age iWiop �. r 14. k ,Co T 4'89'oS'Zf E /9. /j¢. /7, //A cZ exc. ND. /6 5 AET ilA S87 5 27 A/ SEwf,e C,fY 4' ,Car �Z Pmes t 14 ee4 // zZ‘ LOT 3 EAVf1 .H TiThelt 071 rj , g2 /ir /5 , ' kk° 1/ 1 2 Sr4er /fe, re 1 grey /1/6. //OB 4.16. Z 1, c Np, a rJ /O A .� 1. EWEi' bw, 34.6 s " 9 ——/Y89•0¢'47E' 'l //J¢¢T—ay. of i. /.7f. s la 7 '¢ t6./ 24.Z /4/00:e27;4111 ,,v�v 4 t 1 I fatI 11 k k I hereby certify hat this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me c under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Regist ed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minna pa n.„,,,4*,4, Aug. 1Pi, 2014 13774 Date Reg.No main level /I 12 2.5 steel roofing 1/2" roof decking 2x6 rafters m16"o.c. floor line —2x4 ceiling jet. 11116"o.c. finish ceiling 5/4 cedar decking 2x10 AC2 treated 616"o.c, Section 1/4"=11-0" =f match with garage 0 A I -411 hand rail post to ftg bracket concrete post frost footing S'-oil Existing Garage I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 9 co 2x10 AC2 treated jet, e1 "o.c. /\ / /'\ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \�; \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I — - \ \ \ ../ \ \ / Left Side Elevation 1/411=11-0" i porch line above Existing �x i st i nHouse g i-louse post with concrete post frost footing typical I I Footing Flan 1/411=11-0" 2x10 AC2 treated jet, el6'1o,c, QI-4" 251-0" ■ 1 9 9 I co 1—� idli 4111111111111111111111 1 • f 11 1 Front Elevation 1/411=11-0" 6I-4" SI-oil 0 0 0 Existing Garage Note: field verify all dimensions • 2'- Existing I -louse 5'- Covered Forch 9I-4" i 2S 1-o" Main Level Floor }plan 1/411=11-0" O I Ank A. N. BAuER RESIDENTIAL DESIGN SERVICES www,ahbauer.com -115-3S6-518S PROJECT; Mike 4 Lor i lee Estes ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR, FINISHED PROJECT APPEARANCE AND STRUCTURAL DETAILS MAY VARY, NO GUARANTEE IMPLIED, THIS PRINT IS NOT TO BE COPIED OR MADE PUBLIC UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY ABOVE COMPANY, DATE: 3-23-15 DRAWING* PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 10, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-11 APPLICANT: William Hickey, representative of Ideal Credit Union, future property owner REQUEST: Request for a Special Use Permit for a the construction of a new single - story financial institution with drive -through to be located at 2020 Washington Avenue South ZONING: Business Park Commercial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner COMP PLAN: Commercial REQUEST The applicant is proposing a new financial institution with drive - through banking services at the subject property. The new use will be housed in a new building. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND REGULATIONS The City has permitted financial institutions with drive -through banking services by Special Use Permit in the Business Park District. Section 31-207 establishes the review standards for Special Use Permits: The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district, if it is found compatible with surrounding uses. In review of the request with City staff, the following item was determined to be an item of concern: • Parking: A total of 15 parking spaces are required to be met onsite. Although the applicant indicates the ability to create 17 parking spaces, only 12 spaces are proposed to be installed. Although the proof of parking has been established, the parking should be created onsite. o For eating establishments with a drive -through, a total of five stacking spaces are required to be created. The applicant is proposing a two -stall drive - through and utilizing the drive -through stacking requirements is appropriate. There is a single stacking spot behind each stall. Additionally, stacking space exceeding five spaces can be achieved on the north side of the parcel. • Trash: There is no trash enclosure indicated to be located onsite. • Exterior changes: Section 31-319 of the Stillwater City Code requires that the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) conduct a design review on all exterior changes. The applicant will need to obtain a Design Review Permit by the HPC prior to any the release of a building permit or the installation of signage. o Lighting: Ch 31-510, Subd 1(f)(9) indicates Any lights provided to illuminate any parking facility permitted by this subdivision shall be arranged so as to reflect the light away from any adjacent properties, streets or highways. • Landscaping: According to City Code Section 31-513, Landscaping, trees shall be planted along all streets. Street trees shall be set back a distance of ten feet from the street right-of-way. Deciduous trees shall be planted 40 feet on center, and coniferous street trees shall be planted 30 feet on center. o Additionally, all plant materials indicated on an approved landscaping plan that do not survive two growing seasons shall be replaced with identical plants during or before the following season. • Drainage: The applicant is proposing to address stormwater by surface draining the parcel. The surface water would cross over the neighboring parcel, to the east to end up in a stormwater pond to the northwest of this parcel. Although this is historically how drainage has been addressed in this location, staff is recommending the drainage be infiltrated onsite. o Additionally, the project will need to meet the requirements of the Brown's Creek Watershed District and obtain necessary District permits. This use is consistent with the Future Land Use Map identifying this property as having commercial use in 2030. There are no contradictory elements with the Comprehensive Plan. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed or use and/or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. CPC 6/10/2015 (SUP/2015-11) 2020 Washington Avenue South Page 2 of 4 If approved with certain conditions, a financial institution with drive -through at this location will not be a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. ALTERNATIVES, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The Commission has the following options: 1. Determine that the proposed financial institution with drive -through services is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Special Use Permits with or without conditions. If the Commission would like to approve the Case No. 2015-11 with conditions, staff would recommend the following: a. A total of 17 parking spaces shall be created onsite. b. Stormwater infiltration must occur onsite and be designed to capture rains from a l " rainfall event. c. Trees shall be planted along all streets. Street trees shall be set back a distance of ten feet from the street right-of-way. Deciduous trees shall be planted 40 feet on center, and coniferous street trees shall be planted 30 feet on center. All plant materials indicated on an approved landscaping plan that do not survive two growing seasons shall be replaced with identical plants during or before the following season. d. The new structure, site plan to include trash receptacle enclosure, lighting plan and sign plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission by Design Review Permit. Conditions of the Design Review Permit shall be incorporated into the Special Use Permit by reference. e. Lighting fixtures must provide a complete cut-off so the bulb/source of light cannot be seen from off the property and, at the property lines, the illumination has to be engineered to be 0 lumens. f. Prior to submittal of the building permit, the project shall obtain all necessary permits from the Brown's Creek Watershed District. g. Plans and the use will need to be approved by the engineering, fire and building officials before the issuance of a building permit. h. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. 2. Determine that portions of the proposed financial institution with drive -through services are consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and approve in part, with or without conditions. 3. Determine that the proposed financial institution with drive -through services is not consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and deny the Special Use Permit. 4. Table the application requesting more information be brought back before the Commission at their July 8, 2015 meeting. CPC 6/10/2015 (SUP/2015-11) 2020 Washington Avenue South Page 3 of 4 Staff finds the proposed the proposed financial institution with drive -through services is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions, the Comprehensive Plan and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or become a nuisance. Therefore staff would recommend approval with the aforementioned conditions. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative Request Site, Landscape and Floor Plans (4 pages) Color Facade Renderings (4 pages) CPC 6/10/2015 (SUP/2015-11) 2020 Washington Avenue South Page 4 of 4 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, inc. 15 May 2015 Abbi Whitman City of Stillwater City Planner 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Ideal Credit Union — Site Plan Review Abbi — Cie Architecture Engineering Interiors Planning Preservation Enclosed please find the required submission materials for site plan review of the proposed Ideal Credit Union, to be located at 2020 Washington Avenue in Stillwater. Ideal Credit Union is a prosperous financial institution with branches throughout the east metro region. Founded in 1926, they are continuing their growth with this new branch facility in Stillwater. This facility will include normal banking functions, including financial services, cash transactions, and related office -based uses. The building includes a lobby, offices, teller area, restrooms, and service / support functions. There will be two covered drive -through ATM lanes, with a third uncovered lane for oversize vehicles. The building will be constructed with sophisticated, high-level materials appropriate to a financial institution. The Ideal Credit Union facility will be highly compatible with its area (which includes several financial institutions) . It will in fact be the first credit union in the vicinity. As you know, this area is one of Stillwater's retail and service hubs, and the proposed use will increase the banking convenience and options available to residents and shoppers. There will be no adverse effect on the surrounding businesses. Very truly yours, p Collaborayve'Desi h Group, I illiam D. Hickey'AIA, LEED®-AP rincipal Enclosures c. Jeanine Swanson, Ideal Credit Union Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 t 612.332/3654 f 332.3626 www.collaborativedesigngroup.com Ideal Credit Union 2020 Washington Avenue Project Map N. cc It4t4e. Pa. ..a N. f k•‘.......„.......„.24.4v. ,_ • . ti • * _ ... ill' I'a 1 F 1 r."I i•♦ �� wr1' - 11 , .���" ' AP \ ,__,,,_-• ate_ . _ it i -,r +i ti arm �y __.___ _- ice_ - --- !1 * �b a' �7� �..Ira1% II 4..` u , p'N1 1 - - 1 Itl 1'P+4_YN1• Y - vej -, IZ M II'' `. , .- ;r e - _ ,•..' TOWER DRIVE W • D v. . f - a �.., it,______ML ,ir. x11r ► ie - • • IEP R. ! k. e } , �� i t , f' „-- c + l .. OAD • - . , _ _ -- --. _ _ I' Tie HWY 36 ' , • _. m 1 •'- , ys� . e ',. - -'� Project Team Owner : Ideal Credit Union 8499 Tamarack Rd. Woodbury, MN 55125 Contact - Jeanine Swanson Phone - 651-770-7000 Email - jswanson@idealcu.com Architect : Collaborative Design Group 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Contact - Elizabeth McCollough Phone - 612-371-6425 Email - emccollough@collaborativedesigngroup.com Civil Engineer : West Arm Engineering 4710 West Arm Road Spring Park, MN 55384 Contact - Ian Maloney Phone - 952-471-1072 Email - ian@westarmeng.com Landscape Architect: Biko Associates 79 13th Ave. NE, Suite 107 Minneapolis, MN 55104 Contact - Bill Smith Phone - 612-623-4000 Email - Structural Engineer : Collaborative Design Group 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Contact - Craig Milkert Phone - 612-332-3654 Email - cmilkert@collaborativedesigngroup.com Mechanical Engineer : MEP Associates 2401 Pilot Knob Rd, #134 Eagan, MN 55120 Contact - Phone - 651-379-9120 Email - Electrical Engineer : MEP Associates 2401 Pilot Knob Rd, #134 Eagan, MN 55120 Contact - Phone - 651-379-9120 Email - Drafting Symbols (G) AI1ST FLOOR EL. = 100'-0" MAJOR / MINOR BUILDING ELEVATION MAJOR / MINOR BUILDING SECTION DETAIL REFERENCE DETAIL REFERENCE TO PLAN, ELEVATION, OR SECTION ENLARGEMENT GRID LINE EXISTING GRID LINE MATCH LINE PROPERTY LINE CENTER LINE FLOOR ELEVATION DIMENSION STRING CONTINUOUS DIMENSION 1-HOUR RATED WALL CONSTRUCTION 2-HOUR RATED WALL CONSTRUCTION 2 DRAWING NUMBER INTERIOR ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER 3 TITLE A110 SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0" W1 OFFICE 200 SHEET NUMBER 7 EXISTING CONSTRUCTION REVISION TYPE & NUMBER DRAWING TITL. PARTITION TYPE WINDOW TYPE ROOM NAME ROOM NUMBER )OOR NUMBER DOOR OPENING DOOR NUMBS-. — REVISION TRIANGLE CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE (OPTIONAL) REVISION CLOUD Project Rendering Stillwater, MN 55082 Sheet Index 05-15-15 SITE PLAN REVIEW TITLE SHEET A000 SHEET INDEX, CODE DATA AND LOCATION MAP ■ CIVIL / LANDSCAPING C1 SITE PLAN ■ L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A200 FLOOR PLAN ■ A400 BUILDING ELEVATIONS / RENDERING (11 x 17 SHEETS) ■ A401 BUILDING ELEVATIONS / RENDERING (11 x 17 SHEETS) ■ A402 BUILDING ELEVATIONS / RENDERING (11 x 17 SHEETS) ■ A403 BUILDING ELEVATIONS / RENDERING (11 x 17 SHEETS) ■ Code Data BUILDING CODE SUMMARY Applicable Codes: 1. 2007 Minnesota State Building Code 2. 2007 Minnesota State Fire Code 3. 2007 Minnesota Building Conservation Code 4. MN Rule 1323 Minnesota State Energy Code 5. 2005 National Electric Code 6. 2006 International Building Code 7. 2006 International Residential Code 8. 2006 International Fire Code 9. 2006 International Mechanical Code 10. 2006 International Fuel & Gas Code 11. NFPA101 Life Safety Code 12. ICC A117.1 2003 Accessibility Code Year Constructed: Type of Construction: Building Area: 2015 B-Buisiness 2993 SF CHAPTER 3 - USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: 302 Classification B-Business Business B 2,993 sq.ft. CHAPTER 5 - GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS Table 503 Allowable Height and Building Areas Construction Type BV CHAPTER 6 - TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION: VB Allowable Area / Story 9,000 SF 2 Story (40 FT) Table 601 Fire Risistant Rating for Building Elemements Type VB Construction Type Structural Frame Exterior Bearing Walls Exterior Non -Bearing Walls Interior Walls Floor Construction Roof Construction 0 Hr 0 Hr 0 Hr 0 Hr 0 Hr 0 Hr CHAPTER 7 - FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION: Fire Safety Sprinklers Fire Alarm Panel Standpipes Fire Alarm Notification/Detection Water Supply Fire Access (# of sides) Fire Wall (area separation) Fully Yes Not Required Fully Yes 4 Not Required Occupant Load: 30 Actual Area / Story 2,993 SF 1 Story BUILDING CODE - Continued CHAPTER 7 - FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION: 704.8 Maximum Area of Exterior Wall Opening 707.1 Fire Resistance Rating at Shafts 717.2.2 Concealed Wall Spaces CHAPTER 9 - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 907.2.2 Group B CHAPTER 10 - MEANS OF EGRESS 1003.2 Ceiling Height None required when exterior wall not required to be rated One story building Fireblocking in wall spaces vertically at ceiling and floor provided Fireblocking in wall spaces horizontally at max. 10 FT intervals provided Manual fire alarm system not required in sprinklered buildings Required Provided 7'-6" min 9'-0" Table 104.1.1 Maximum Floor Area Allowable Per Occupant Business - 100 Gross 2993SF / 100 SF = 30 Occupants Table 1005.1 Egress Width Per Occupant Served Business, Sprinklered Stairways Other Egress Components N/A .15 x 30 = 4.5" Required = 90" Provided 1007.1 Accessible Means of Egress Table 1016.1 Exit Access Travel Distance Business, Sprinklered CHAPTER 29 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS Required 2 300 FT Table 2902.1 Minimum Number of Required Plumbing Fixtures Business - B Required Water Closet - 1 Per 25 for first 50 Lavatories - 1 Per 40 for first 80 Drinking Fountatin - 1 Per 100 Service Sink 1 M, 1 F 1 M, 1 F 1 1 Provided 2 Provided 1 M, 1 F, 1 Family 1 M, 1 F, 1 Family 1 1 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 p 612.332.3654 f 612.332.3626 www.collaborativedesigngroup.com W WEST ARM ENGINEERING 4710 WEST ARM ROAD SPRING PARK MN 55384 952-471-1072 WWW.WESTARM ENG.COM 11/111 BIKO ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED • ■ 0 caCD 2020 Washington Avenue 00 a) co 2 a) I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature William D. Hickey, AIA Name 20111 05-15-15 License # Date SITE PLAN REVIEW MAY 15, 2015 REVISION LOG NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 15030.00 PROJECT NUMBER XXX XXX DRAWN BY CHECKED BY EAM WDH PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT TITLE SHEET A000 COLLABORATIVE DESIGN GROUP, INC. SURFACE DRAINS TO RETENTION POND 60' N LEXINGTON INN "co / UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT Lc) i SITE LIGHTING (4 TYP) CURB CUT 103.64' 265.46' xx CD Z_ Y o_ U- 0 U- 0 0 o_ O rn Z X co wN LIJ >- O < 0 U) u f ) w 5 B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (TYP)—r- PERKINS RESTAURANT i 1 21' n r,' SIDE r. r rn w rs I./ ro BITUMINOUS PARKING & DRIVES DRIVE THRU l ONE WAY '6 • l L 12' L 12' 5.33' 5.33' 20' SIDE SETBACK 5.25' — cn r TWO WAY oo 5 j j Q_ 6 03 CONCRETE WALK I At J J D w 7 � 28' ONE WAY ro cV r 362.61' LEGEND: >( SITE LIGHTING STORMWATER RUNOFF 516' TO TOWER DR INTERSECTION 2' s '9 \ SITE ENTRANCE/EXIT— EXISTING CURB CUT TO REMAIN \i`. o • 337' TO FRONTAGE RD INTERSECTION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (2) EXISTING PYLON SIGN TO REMAIN UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT GENERAL INFORMATION LOT AREA: 41,099 SF (0.94 AC) SET BACKS: FRONT SIDE BACK 40 FT 20 FT 30 FT 0 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 40 PARKING: REQUIRED PROVIDED PROOF OF PARKING TOTAL 1/200 SF = 15 12 5 17 ADA 1/50 SPACES = 1 1 1 SPACE DIMENSIONS 18' x 9' COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, ins. 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 p 612.332.3654 f 612.332.3626 www.collaborativedesigngroup.com W WEST ARM ENGINEERING 471 0 WEST ARM ROAD SPRING PARK MN 55384 952-471-1 072 WWW.WESTARMENG.COM CI\Users\eo.m.CDG\Desktop\l❑G❑, jpg 2020 Washington Avenue Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Name 05-15-15 License # Date SITE PLAN REVIEW MAY 15, 2015 REVISION LOG NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 15030.00 PROJECT NUMBER ISM DRAWN BY EAM CHECKED BY WDH PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT SITE PLAN © COLLABORATIVE DESIGN GROUP, INC. Cl i i i I AERIAL SITE PLAN EXISTING WOODED AREA. REMOVE WEEDS AND BRACKEN. L v lTD 0 13 00 00000 1 RB 08°00° . o 16 GB o° oa o ° 0 C• 11 • o 0 00 00 0 ga Do° I •: BIKE RACK 23 PA 9 RD FA GB It 1 AP EXISTING • 24" ASH • EXISTING 18" HONEY - LOCUST- 0 EXISTING PYLON -SIGN- _TO REMAIN A010 SCALE: 1" = 20' THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. CUT BACK WIRE BASKET REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELING FROM TREE. WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 1 6"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE MULCH - 4" DEEP - PER SPEC. WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. 2 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL L1.1 SCALE: NTS ."IIII .,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIIIbull'. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES PRUNE ANY DAMAGED BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELING FROM TREE. WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12' LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE MULCH - 4" DEEP - PER SPECS. MULCH MUST NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING ROOT BALL SET ON MOUNDED SUBGRADE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL L1.1 SCALE: NTS VARIES SEE PLAN PERENNIAL PLANTING SCALE: NTS REFER TO PLAN 18" MIN. or 4„, v44*---044044i1 illl 1 I 1111- I MULCH - SEE SPECS. 3" DEPTH EDGER - SEE SPECS. EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN 12" DEPTH (MIN). LOAM PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPECS. LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE. MULCH - 311 DEEP - SEE SPEC LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE SPEC. EDGING MATERIAL - SEE SPEC. EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. BUILDING WALL (TYP) SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NTS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE SYM QTY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE CONT COMMENTS ORNAMENTAL TREES RB SS 1 1 ROYAL FROST BIRCH SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE BETULA SZECHUANICA MALUS 6' HGT 1.5" CAL B&B B&B CLUMP SINGLE STEM EVERGREEN TREES AP SP 2 2 AUSTRIAN PINE SCOTCH PINE PINUS NIGRA PINUS SYLVESTRIS 6' HGT 6' HGT B&B B&B FULL FORM FULL FORM DECIDUOUS SHRUBS RD 21 RED TWIGGED DOGWOOD COMUS SERICEA 24" HGT POT PLANT 8" O.C. PERENNIALS FA PA 35 52 FANAL ASTILBLE PURPLE DOME ASTER ASTILBE ASTER 1 GAL 1 GAL POT POT PLANT 2' O.C. PLANT 2' O.C. COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup, ins. 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 p 612.332.3654 f 612.332.3626 www.collaborativedesigngroup.com w WEST ARM ENGINEERING 4710 WEST ARM ROAD SPRING PARK MN 55384 952-471-1072 WWW.WESTARMENG.COM BIKO ASSOCIATES I--� I IV C O R PORATED ■ 0 milmo ■ C O bA C co N 0 N (f) I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. William D. Hickey, AIA Name 20111 05-15-15 License # Date SITE PLAN REVIEW MAY 15, 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION LOG NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 15030.00 PROJECT NUMBER EAM WDH DRAWN BY CHECKED BY EAM WDH PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE PLAN COLLABORATIVE DESIGN GROUP, INC. LI-I DRIVE THRU LANE 3 5'-4" 12'-0" 5'-4" 57'-5" 8'-5" 37'-0" 10'-10" 12'-0" a SERVICE 113 I I (RECYCLING I I TRASH I I 0 0 0 ATM 0 0 0 J 1 FLOOR PLAN DRIVE THRU LANE 2 0 0 0 ATM 0 0 N co io CO DRIVE THRU LANE 1 CO BREAK ROOM 105 L I \\ I \\ CASH 104 JAN. 112 WORK 106 UNISEX/ \ EMPLOYEES\ 111 L_ l WOMEN 110 J IT 103 F" f / / MEN 109 TELLERS 107 OFFICE 102 LOBBY 108 OFFICE 101 33'-10" 0 0 COFFEE VESTIBULE 114 KIDS OFFICE 100 56'-3" Co Ln CO BIKE RACK PUBLIC PARKING N A A200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" r6N, COLLABORATIVE • DesignGroup, inc. 100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 p 612.332.3654 f 612.332.3626 www.collaborativedesigngroup.com W WEST ARM ENGINEERING 471 0 WEST ARM ROAD SPRING PARK MN 55384 952-471-1072 WWW.WESTARMENG.COM I BIKO ASSOCIATES I N C O R P O R A T E D 0 212 cp 2020 Washington Avenue N 00 CO O a) 2 a) co I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature William D. Hickey, AIA Name 20111 05-15-15 License # Date SITE PLAN REVIEW MAY 15, 2015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION LOG NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 15030.00 PROJECT NUMBER EAM WDH DRAWN BY CHECKED BY EAM WDH PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ARCHITECT FLOOR PLAN A200 © COLLABORATIVE DESIGN GROUP, INC. EAST ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STONE MATERIAL METAL PANEL IDEAL CREDIT UNION 2020 Washington Ave - Stillwater, MN May 15, 2015 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. A400 WEST ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL STONE MATERIAL IDEAL CREDIT UNION 2020 Washington Ave - Stillwater, MN May 15, 2015 C COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. A401 • SOUTH ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STONE MATERIAL METAL PANEL IDEAL CREDIT UNION 2020 Washington Ave - Stillwater, MN May 15, 2015 C COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. A402 NORTH ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL IDEAL CREDIT UNION 2020 Washington Ave - Stillwater, MN May 15, 2015 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. A403 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 10, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-112 APPLICANT: Phillip Westby, applicant, Steve Abbott (KSDT Properties), property owner REQUEST: A Seasonal Outdoor Sales permit for the installation of a produce stand in the parking lot of the property at 1672 Greeley Street South, Abbott Carpet and Paint ZONING: Business Park Commercial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner COMP PLAN: Commercial REQUEST The applicant is requesting a first time, annual Seasonal Outdoor Sales permit for the installation of produce stand to be located in the parking lot of the subject property. The produce stand would be operated 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., seven days a week. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND REGULATIONS Section 41-7, Seasonal Outdoor Sales, indicates the Planning Commission shall review the annual permit for the first year. If no substantial changes occur, the permit may be administratively approved in subsequent years. As the City has not defined review process for the Planning Commission's review, the City has traditionally utilized the review process and procedure for Special Use Permits. Section 31-325 indicates eating establishments in the Central Business District require a Special Use Permit. Section 31-207 establishes the review standards for Special Use Permits: The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district, if it is found compatible with surrounding uses. In review of the request with City staff, the following item was determined to be an item of concern: • Parking: The produce stand is proposed to be located in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The existing 6,240 square foot business is required to have 21 parking spaces onsite. o There are 18 parking spaces adjacent to the east and south sides of the building. o An additional 5 spaces, facing Curve Crest Boulevard, exist in a location where all parking lot design requirements are being met. o As the produce stand will necessitate two parking spaces, and will not be located in an area where existing parking is required to be located, the off- street parking requirements are being met. o The pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns on the site will not be disrupted. • Trash: The applicant has verbally indicated minimal trash is produced with the seasonal outdoor sales. Any trash will be required to be contained within the tent. • Utilities: No utilities will be associated with the seasonal outdoor sales. • Signage: A total of three signs may be permitted with this use and only one may be painted or affixed directly to the tent. However, up to two banners are permitted to be affixed to the tent. o Each of the canopies of the tent have the name of the business or a product advertised for sale. As the tent canopies are similar to banners, staff has determined no greater than three sides of the tent may advertise the business name or products for sale. o No additional signage would be permitted. Staff has not determined there to be conflicts with the proposed use and the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed or use and/or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. If approved with certain conditions, the addition of this seasonal produce stand at this location will not be a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. CPC 6/10/2015 (2015-12) 1672 Greely Street South Page 2 of 3 ALTERNATIVES, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The Commission has the following options: 1. Determine the proposed produce is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions, the Comprehensive Plan and approve the Seasonal Outdoor Sales permit with or without conditions. If the Commission would like to approve the Case No. 2015-12 with conditions, staff would recommend the following: a. The Seasonal Outdoor Sales tent shall not be placed onsite before May 15 and shall be removed by November 15, annually. b. The Seasonal Outdoor Sales tent shall be located as close to the established curb, at the southeast corner of the parking lot, as to not impede existing parking lot traffic. c. No utilities shall be extended to the Seasonal Outdoor Sales tent. d. All existing and future trash receptacles shall be stored inside the tent. Trash shall be removed from the facility daily. e. The total number of signs shall be limited to three. f. No greater than three canopy signs shall be permitted. g. An inspection by the Fire Marshal will be required prior to the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation opening for business, annually. h. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will need to go to the Planning Commission for review and approval. 2. Determine the proposed produce is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions, the Comprehensive Plan and approve, in part, the Seasonal Outdoor Sales permit with or without conditions. 3. Determine the proposed use is not consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions or the Comprehensive Plan and deny the Seasonal Outdoor Sales permit. If denied, the Planning Commission 4. Table the application requesting more information be brought back before the Commission at their July 8, 2015 meeting. Staff finds the proposed produce stand is consistent with the Special Use Permit provisions, the Comprehensive Plan and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or become a nuisance. Therefore staff would recommend approval with the aforementioned conditions. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Narrative Request Applicant Site Plan Operations Tent CPC 6/10/2015 (2015-12) 1672 Greely Street South Page 3 of 3 ,. -. , Jj11water ,L.., ,. ,.,,. g „...„... . i ,.. --1--- 1 -,.....------- The Birthplace of Minnesota Site Location z ; t " ��� '' � .cis rr r .+r --'t...r �. FARM FRESH TOMATOES iNFGoJ�M'i ,. j r.< tRci F �• N � � E UV S 0 80 160 320 Feet t ,- SWEET CORN & PEACHES 1672 Greeley Street South ii 1630 L• V J •., 1635 Z 5 J P 634 . CO fit gyl �„ -1r 1f e ;;R Parcel Boundaries +"— Municipal Boundary 640 164$ I • W r s+� 1--� 6�- •� Xi '--� T "'• w h 1656 165Q/ % +,z i 1675 r ar ��• 6I- °' 61- • s General Site Location ,• - �;� �� ppp - _ .._ S w ."1101,1110111 •�� 9 06 �� 1050 REST 1672 _I 1t 1709 g 1, . � j • � 0 o J � �a - I. j f � To whom it may concern, C-stop, Ilc. dba The Country Stop operates retail produce gazebos in various cities throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin. The business has been around for over 30 plus years and started in West Central and Northern Minnesota. Over the past few years we have expanded to metro area. Our stands typically open early June and operate through Labor Day. Stands are manned between the hours of 9 AM — 6 PM seven days per week. Our sales consist of farm fresh produce such as: Sweet corn, melons, tomatoes, potatoes, peaches, berries, and other fruits and vegetables. We start out by getting products from farmers down south that we have done business with for years. We work our way up through the states until the local product is ready. We grow some of our own product as well as get some from local growers from Waverly, MN and Roberts, WI. Our gazebos (please see the attached photo) take up roughly 2 parking spaces. The distance from post to post is approximately 13 feet. The canopy is a little longer and is roughly 18 feet in diameter. To the crown of the gazebo is roughly 13 feet high. The banners on the gazebo are 20 inches by 70 inches. Contact info: Landowner - Steve Abbott - 651-439-9695 Applicant - Phillip Westby - 320-212-1291 (C) 320-354-2434 (W) Manager - Brandon Larsen — 507-430-4300 (C) 1672 Greeley St S - Google Maps 5/13/2015 1672 Greeley St' Street View Search nearby Total distance: 262.61 ft • lltt,'. itLURE 111111111111111111 amimiuni 1111111111111111 https://www.google.com/maps/p!ace/1672+Greeley+St+S,+Stillwater,+MN+P l@45.0412713; 92.U13G94,97m/data=l3m1!1e3!4m213m1!1sOx57h2e9ll0c0tb9d41:Ox16e49cb91'2a321!6m1!1e1 1/1 gcli FARM CRESH TOMATOESjr 4111) THECOOTRY SRI 1,1 Ntqww-4---Alersi PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 10, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-13 REQUEST: Consideration of a Zoning Text Amendment (ZAT) to various City Code Sections regarding design review and Design Review Permitting, to include the removal of Design Review Permits for certain signage in the West Stillwater Business Park District PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner BACKGROUND All signs in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district require a Design Review Permit prior to the release of a Sign Permit. However, there are no standards for the design of signs. Consequently, the design review of signs has been subjective. As such, the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) discussed the removal of the Design Review Permit requirements for all existing signs and signs within an approved multi -tenant sign plan. The HPC reviewed the proposed changes at their regularly -scheduled meeting in June and recommended approval of the Zoning Text Amendment. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION The specific changes include: • All permits will be referred to as Design Review Permits, consistent with City Code Section 31-209. • Signs associated with new construction in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district will require a Design Review Permit. • All new multi -tenant master sign plans in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district will require a Design Review Permit. • All Design Review Permits will be reviewed and approved by the HPC. • Design review may occur administratively for existing signs proposed to be replaced, signs proposed in part of an approved multi -tenant sign plan as well as new signs on existing businesses FINDINGS Prior to making a recommendation for approval or modified approval of a proposed amendment to the city council, the commission must first find that the public necessity, and the general community welfare are furthered; and that the proposed amendment is in general conformance with the principles, policies and land use designations set forth in the comprehensive plan. Comprehensive Plan chapter 5: Historic Resources Goal 3 is to enhance the visual and aesthetic character, diversity and interest of Stillwater. This ordinance amendment will continue to allow for the HPC to conduct design review on new signage but will allow for new sign permits for existing signage replacements to be reviewed administratively. RECOMMENDATION Section 31-205 indicates a public hearing must be held by the planning commission on all proposed amendments. The commission must forward a recommendation for approval, modified approval or denial to the city council for final action. Staff recommends the Commission forward a favorable recommendation of approval to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS Legislative Revision Draft Ordinance Design Review Permits ZAT Case No. 2015-13 (CPC: 6-10-2015) Page 2 of 2 Draft Ordinance: Legislative Revision Sec. 22-7. - Heritage preservation commission. Subd. 5. Additional powers and duties of the commission. The commission shall have the following powers and duties, in addition to those otherwise specified in this section: (7) The Heritage Preservation Commission must also assume responsibility for the design review of any dwelling house hereafter proposed for construction on now existing vacant lots or on lots that become vacant by reason of demolition or destruction of existing structures within the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD). In furtherance of that purpose, the Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines, as approved by the City Council on February 17, 2006, are hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth in this ordinance. Copies of the Design Guidelines are on file in the office of the City Clerk and available at the Stillwater Public Library. The following process will guide the HPC and the applicants. e. Approval: If the application is approved, a Design PcrmitDesign Review Permit Design Review Permit will be issued by the Planning Staff to the applicant, and Building Department. f. Appeal: The applicant or any interested person aggrieved with the HPC action, may, within 10 days, revise and resubmit the application to the HPC or appeal the decision to City Council. Building Permit: Once approved, the plans may be completed and submitted to Building Officials for Building Permit review. The plans will also then be reviewed for Design PcrmitDesign Review Permit compliance by the Planning Staff. h. Enforcement: The Community Development Department will monitor compliance with the Design PermitDesign Review Permit and any conditions of approval. Sec. 31-209. Design permitDesign Review Permit. g. Design permitDesign Review Permits shall require the following: (a) Purpose. The intent of the design review procedure is to secure the general purposes of the comprehensive plan, West Stillwater Business Park Plan and downtown plan, to maintain the character and integrity of neighborhoods and commercial districts by promoting excellence of design and development, preventing traffic hazards, providing adequate services and encouraging development in harmony with its neighborhood or planning area. (c) Required when. A design review permit is required for the following: (2) Type of projects and uses with the downtown plan district and the west business park plan district: i. All signs requiring a sign permit in the Downtown design review district. ii. All new signs proposed in conjunction with a new structure or development in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district. Legislative Revision, Page 1 All new multi -tenant sign plans in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district. (e) Review of the application by the design review committee. The design review committee must review all applications. The community development director must arrange with the applicant a time and place of meeting between the applicant and the design review committee. The design review committee must make a final decision on the granting or denial of a sign permitDesign Review Permit after seeking the recommendation of the community development director. The sign -}-Design Review Permit applicant or any party aggrieved by the decision of the committee has a right to appeal the decision to the city council. (h) Findings and decisions. Upon a finding by the design review committee that the application, subject to any conditions imposed, will need the standards of design review, secure the purpose of this chapter, the comprehensive plan and the heritage preservation ordinance, the design review committee may approve the design permitDesign Review Permit, subject to conditions as it deems necessary. If a finding is made that the permit would violate the standards of design review, it must deny the application. Conformance to approval and site supervision. The community development director shall perform site supervision of building permits for which design permitDesign Review Permits have been granted to ensure compliance with all provisions and conditions of the design approval. Sec. 31-322. - CRD campus research district. (i) (d) Other requirements. (6) Design permitDesign Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all CRD campus research and development district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. Sec. 31-324. - PWFD public works facility district. (d) Other requirements. (6) Design permitDesign Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all PWF district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. Sec. 31-509. - Sign regulations. Sign regulations are as follows: Subd. 2. Permits required. All signs require a design review permit and may also require a Design Review Permit. An application for design reviewa Design Review Permit may be obtained from the community development director. The application must contain the following information: Sec. 31-510. - Off-street parking and loading. Off-street parking and loading shall be regulated as follows: Subd. 1. Off-street parking. Legislative Revision, Page 2 (c) Number of parking spaces required. Where the computation or required parking spaces produces a fractional result, fractions of one-half or greater shall require one full parking space. (3) Shared parking facilities. Parking facilities may be shared by two or more commercial uses if their entrances are located within 300 feet of each other and if their hours of operation do not coincide, provided they: i. Receive special use and design permitsdesign review so that design criteria are met and conditions of use may be established along with periodic review. Design requirements. Design requirements shall be as follows: (2) Parking facility layout. There shall be no off-street parking spaces located within 15 feet of any street right-of-way or ten feet of any property line except in the central business district where spaces may be allowed with an approved design permitDesign Review Permit. Sec. 31-512. - Regulation of radio and television towers. (f) Subd. 3. Antenna and towers in residential districts (RA, RB, RCM, RCH). Any person, firm or corporation erecting a tower or antenna in a residential district must obtain a conditional use permit from the city council and meet the following requirements: (8) A tower must be setback from a street line a minimum of the height of the tower and any antenna; and towers or antennas may be sited in preferred locations as listed in Subd. 2 of this Section 31-512 subject to design permitDesign Review Permit approval. Sec. 31-517. - CRD, campus research district miscellaneous standards. I (5) Design permitDesign Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all CRD campus research and development district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. Sec. 31-518. - PWFD, public works facility district miscellaneous standards. (5) Design permitDesign Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all PWF district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. Sec. 41-7. - Seasonal outdoor sales. Subd. 2. Seasonal food vending. Seasonal food vending is allowed by annual permit only on private property as an accessory use within the CBD zoning district, subject to the requirements of this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision, "seasonal food vending" does not include food vending for events. Event food vending requires an event permit pursuant to City Resolution No. 2010-204 and any subsequent revisions to that resolution. The annual permit for a seasonal food vending cart or vehicle may be approved by the city subject to the following: (1) A completed permit application form must be submitted annually (including permit fee) to the community development department. The completed application must be Legislative Revision, Page 3 submitted at least 60 days prior to the first seasonal usage of the cart or vehicle. To be considered complete, the application must include the completed application form, permit fee, and the following additional information. (b) Site and operations plans detailing at least the following: 2. Color photographs or renderings and dimensions of all four sides of the vehicle or cart, including exterior facade design. (1) If the food vending cart or vehicle is proposed to remain in place for a period of 20 hours or greater, the exterior facade design shall require a design permitDesign Review Permit as reviewed and approved by the heritage preservation commission. (2) The design permitDesign Review Permit standards shall include the following: Legislative Revision, Page 4 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE SEC. 22-7, HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION, SEC. 31-209, DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT, SEC. 31-322, CRD CAMPUS RESEARCH DISTRICT, SEC. 31-324, PWFD PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY DISTRICT, SEC. 31-509, SIGN REGULATIONS, SEC. 31-510, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING, SEC. 31-512, REGULATION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION TOWERS, SEC. 517, CRD, CAMPUS RESEARCH DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS STANDARDS, SEC. 31-518, PWFD, PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY DISTRICT MISCELLANEOUS STANDARDS, SEC. 41-7, SEASONAL OUTDOOR SALES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to clarify design review requirements for certain signage in the West Stillwater Business Park District, to correct errors between Design Permits and Design Review Permits, and to clarify the difference between design review and a Design Review Permit. 1. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 22, Heritage Preservation Commission, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. 5, Additional powers and duties of the commission. i. 7(e) Approval. If the application is approved, a Design Review Permit will be issued by the Planning Staff to the applicant, and Building Department. ii. 7(g) Building Permit. Once approved, the plans may be completed and submitted to Building Officials for Building Permit review. The plans will also then be reviewed for Design Review Permit compliance by the Planning Staff. iii. 7(h) Enforcement. The Community Development Department will monitor compliance with the Design Review Permit and any conditions of approval. 2. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-209, Design Review Permit, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. (c) Required when. A Design Review Permit is required for the following: i. (2)xi. All signs requiring a sign permit in the Downtown design review district. ii. (2)xii. All new signs proposed in conjunction with a new structure or development in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district. iii. (2)xiii. All new multi -tenant sign plans in the West Stillwater Business Park design review district. b. Subd. (e) Review of the application by the design review committee. The design review committee must review all applications. The community development director must arrange with the applicant a time and place of meeting between the applicant and the design review committee. The design review committee must make a final decision on the granting or denial of a Design Review Permit after seeking the recommendation of the community development director. The Design Review Permits, Page 1 of 3 Design Review Permit applicant or any party aggrieved by the decision of the committee has a right to appeal the decision to the city council. c. Subd. (h) Findings and decisions. Upon a finding by the design review committee that the application, subject to any conditions imposed, will need the standards of design review, secure the purpose of this chapter, the comprehensive plan and the heritage preservation ordinance, the design review committee may approve the Design Review Permit, subject to conditions as it deems necessary. If a finding is made that the permit would violate the standards of design review, it must deny the application. d. Subd. (i) Conformance to approval and site supervision. The community development director shall perform site supervision of building permits for which Design Review Permits have been granted to ensure compliance with all provisions and conditions of the design approval. 3. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-322, CRD Campus Research Development, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. (d) Other requirements. i. (6) Design Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all CRD campus research and development district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. 4. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-324, PWFD Public Works Facility District, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. (d) Other requirements. i. (6)Design Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all PWF district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. 5. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-509, Sign Regulations, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. 2. Permits required. All signs require a design review and may also require a Design Review Permit. An application for a Design Review Permit may be obtained from the community development director. The application must contain the following information: b. Subd. 7. Permitted signs by a sign permit in the central business or general commercial district. The following signs are permitted in the CBD-central business or CA -general commercial districts with a sign permit: i. (3) Permit review. All signs in the central business district require a Design Review Permit and meet the approved downtown design guidelines for signage. 6. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-510, Off -Street Parking and Loading, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. 1. Off-street parking. i. (d)(3)i Receive special use and design review so that design criteria are met and conditions of use may be established along with periodic review. ii. (f)(2) Parking facility layout. There shall be no off-street parking spaces located within 15 feet of any street right-of-way or ten feet of any property line except in the central business district where spaces may be allowed with an approved Design Review Permit. 7. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-512, Regulation of Radio and Television Towers, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: Design Review Permits, Page 2 of 3 a. Subd. 3. (8) A tower must be setback from a street line a minimum of the height of the tower and any antenna; and towers or antennas may be sited in preferred locations as listed in Subd. 2 of this Section 31-512 subject to Design Review Permit approval. 8. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-517, CRD - Campus Research District Miscellaneous Standards, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. (5) Design Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all CRD campus research and development district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. 9. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 31-518, PWFD - Public Works Facility District Miscellaneous Standards, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. (5) Design Review Permit. A design review permit is required for all CRD campus research and development district uses according to the design review standards of this chapter. 10. Amending. Stillwater City Code Section 41-7, CRD - Seasonal Outdoor Sales, is amended that will hereafter read as follows: a. Subd. 2 Seasonal Food Vending. i. (1)(b)2(1) If the food vending cart or vehicle is proposed to remain in place for a period of 20 hours or greater, the exterior facade design shall require a Design Review Permit as reviewed and approved by the heritage preservation commission. ii. (1)(b)2(1)(2)The Design Review Permit standards shall include the following. 11. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapters 22, 31 and 41 shall remain in full force and effect. 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to the law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this day of July, 2015. ATTEST: Diane F. Ward, City Clerk CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Design Review Permits, Page 3 of 3 Date: To: From: Re: June 10, 2015 City of Stillwater Trails Master Plan Planning Commission Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Abbi Wittman, City Planner Melissa Douglas, Planning Consultant City of Stillwater, Trails Master Plan Update, Public Hearing and Review of Comments on Draft Plan Vision and Guiding Principles Build on Stillwater's history and natural setting to become a leading active transportation community and one of Minnesota's premier trail destinations. Community. A destination trail system that serves the people of Stillwater as well as visitors, businesses and employers. Promotes tourism, job creation and economic vitality. Provides access to nature and understanding of the city's history. Safety. A trail system that ensures safe recreation and travel for all trail users regardless of age or ability. Encourages activity and wellness. Accessibility. A trail system that is easily accessed and accommodates a mix of users inclusive of all abilities. Information about the trail system is readily accessible and easy to understand. Connections. A trail system that links neighborhoods, schools, employment opportunities, commercial areas, regional trails and public transportation and connects members of the community to each other and the landscape. Communication. A trail system that educates and interprets the landscape and natural setting, uses technology to make information widely available and includes signage that is clear and informative. In May and early June, the draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan was circulated for public review and comment: ✓ The draft plan was posted on the City's website with a survey form for feedback. ✓ Individual meetings were held with Washington County, Oak Park Heights and the Downtown Revitalization Committee Bicycle Subcommittee to review the plan details. ✓ The draft plan was presented at a meeting of Washington County parks and natural resource commission members sponsored by the Alliance for Sustainability. ✓ A public meeting was advertised and attended by over 20 individuals who provided comments and input. ✓ A public hearing on the draft plan and related Comprehensive Plan amendments is scheduled for the June Planning Commission meeting. Attached please find a summary of comments received to date. Comments are aggregated by plan section. After the public hearing, we will review the summary and discuss proposed revisions to the plan. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan, Comments Received Comment Proposed Response Page Reference Improve resolution of images, maps and pictures in documents. (Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director [BT]) Image resolution reduced to minimize file size for easy downloading during public comment period. Higher resolution images will be included in final draft. General Street name/type and jurisdictional corrections throughout document (Shawn Sanders, Public Works Director and City Engineer [SS]). Revisions made. General Agree with importance of connectivity, safety, accessibility, natural/scenic features. Historic interpretation is a nicety if resources are available. Maps with location, distance and directions would be most beneficial. (Survey response) The need for way -finding signage and maps is discussed extensively throughout the plan. No revision needed. p. 8 Trails are not just for recreation but also as routes to schools, stores, etc. (Survey response) No revision needed. P. 9 Lack of discussion of the river in the plan as a transportation corridor and connection to the trail system. (Public meeting comment) Discuss with Planning and Parks Commission how to best incorporate the riverway into the plan. P. 9 Concurs with need for integration of trails in the community and need for continuity to improve convenience, safety and use. (Frank Piontek, resident [FP]) No revision needed. p. 9-10 Concurs with goal of a regional, interconnected trail system. (City of Oak Park Heights [OPH]). Bike racks needed at businesses and malls. (Survey response) New section on bicycle parking to be added. p. 15 New regional trails create significant need for bicycle parking in downtown Stillwater. There should be a standard design for bike racks downtown. Portable racks should be considered as an interim solution. (Downtown Revitalization Committee Bicycle Subcommittee [DRC]) Bicycle parking will be needed downtown and should be provided in commercial areas and at schools and parks. (Public Meeting comments) Trailheads need water and restrooms. (Survey response) Text to be revised to note these facilities should be included at trailheads. p. 15 Concern about adequate parking for regional trail users at trailheads. (Public Meeting comment) 1 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan, Comments Received Comment Response Page Reference Possibility for trailhead or facilities at Kolliner Park? (DRC) A master plan for Kolliner Park was adopted by the City of Stillwater in 1998 included plans for restoration north of the Lift Bridge and trails, beach access and facilities south of the Lift Bridge. This plan will need to be updated to reflect Lift Bridge conversion to pedestrian/bicycle only. Text to be revised to note this property represents an opportunity for the City of Stillwater for development in conjunction with the new St. Croix Crossing Loop Trail. p. 15 Signs and other communications needed emphasizing that Brown's Creek Trail is multi- use, for pedestrians as well as bikers. Could a centerline be added to the trail? (Survey response) Inquiry sent to DNR about whether any further trail signage or markings are to be installed. New section to be added about multi -use potential conflicts and education opportunities. p. 15 p. 19 Conflicts between many users on Brown's Creek Trail — cyclists, pedestrians, skateboarders, roller bladers, segways, surreys — need for education and public safety presence. (DRC) Need for public safety patrols of Brown's Creek Trail. (Public Meeting comment) Provide education on trail courtesy including passing etiquette. (Public meeting comments) Speed limits on trails? (Public Meeting comment) Research potential for speed limits on regional and local trails. p. 15 Notes the need for communication and collaboration between agencies and communities. (FP) Section to be revised to emphasize the need for inter -agency coordination. p. 19 Need for contact and coordination with the DNR on Brown's Creek Trail Management and with MnDOT on the St. Croix Crossing Loop Trail. (Public Meeting comments) No snowmobiles. Plow trails in winter. (Survey response) Two existing snowmobile trails in Stillwater are along Highway 96 and Highway 12/75th Street are designated by Washington County. This information will be noted in new section on potential trail user conflicts. p. 20 Update of snow removal policy will be a separate discussion, not part of the Downtown Master Plan. (BT) Reference to Downtown Master Plan removed. p. 20 2 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan, Comments Received Comment Response Page Reference Add trail section along Neal Avenue as a High Priority, Near -Term improvement, especially the section between Boutwell and McKusick. (FP) Discuss with Planning and Parks Commissions and City Council. p. 21 p. 27 New trail needed along Neal Avenue especially from Eagle Ridge to Brown's Creek Trail. (Survey response). Will work with Stillwater on plans for bicycle/pedestrian improvements for North Frontage Road and Highway 36 corridor including complimentary facilities within Oak Park Heights. Notes that no funding has been identified for further improvements. (OPH) Discuss with Planning and Parks Commissions and City Council. Right -of- way limitations with realignment of the North Frontage Road at Osgood Avenue will limit opportunities for a bicycle lane in this area. p. 22 Figure 4 Add bike route connection to Government Center. (DRC) Discuss with Planning and Parks Commission, City Council and Oak Park Heights. p. 22 Figure 4 Crossings at Highway 36 needed. Map should show connections south of Highway 36 to destinations such as the high school. (Survey response) Revise text to incorporate comments. p. 22 Signal timing for Highway 36 crossings need to accommodate pedestrians/bicyclists. (Public meeting comment) Connection from Highway 5 to Brown's Creek Trail needed. (Survey response) Plan discusses the need for this improvement but does not make it a priority. Depending on alignment/location, connection may be within Stillwater Township. Discuss relative priority of this improvement with Planning and Parks Commissions and City Council. p. 22 Washington County cost -share requirements are a concern. (Steve Russell, resident and former Community Development Director [SR]) Requested clarification of current cost- sharing formula from Washington County staff. p. 22-23 Crosswalks, especially on Highway 12 and Highway 5, are a low-cost way to improve safety and should be a high priority. (SR) Revise text to highlight need for crossing improvements on these corridors. p. 22-23 Improve crossings at Lily Lake School and across Myrtle Street. Conflicts with drivers stopping on trails and sidewalks where they cross driveways, especially along Curvecrest Boulevard. (Survey response) Revise text to note this conflict. p. 23 3 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan, Comments Received Comment Response Page Reference Does Public Works agree that Curvecrest Boulevard is overbuilt? (BT) City Public Works staff concurred with this statement. Last available traffic counts indicate 8500 to 6600 daily vehicle trips on Curvecrest Boulevard. MnDOT State Aid standards require four through lanes only where daily vehicle trips exceed 15,000. Many "road diets" have been successfully implemented throughout Minnesota by converting four lane roadways to three lane roadways, making room for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and improving safety. This information added to the plan and references. p. 23 Recommend new Bike Committee as sub- committee of existing Parks Commission because of limited staff resources. (BT) Discuss with Planning and Parks Commissions and City Council. p. 25 Recommend new Bike Committee include Planning Commission and Park Commission members as well as several at -large community members. (SR) Agree with the need for a new Bike Committee as a subcommittee of either the Planning or Park Commissions. (DRC) Add first -year implementation plan. (SR) Discuss with Planning and Parks Commissions and City Council. p. 26 Park and trail improvements are also made by developers in conjunction with new development. (BT) Revise text for clarification. p. 26 Require park and trail improvements with redevelopment and new development. (FP) Revise timing of proposed trailhead at Highway 96 and Manning Avenue from a mid- term (5-10 years) to a long-term (10+ years) improvement. (SS) Revise table. p. 28 Concurs with need for on -going trail planning and recommends including the City of Bayport in these discussions. (OPH) Revise text and table to include adjacent and nearby communities as well as Washington County. p. 29 Add bike route connection to Stillwater Junior High School. (DRC) Discuss with Planning and Park Commissions and City Council. Figure 4 Figure 4 should more clearly show existing versus proposed trails along 75th Street. (BT) Revisions to be included in final map draft. Figure 4 Figure 4 does not clearly show trail connections around Long Lake. (FP) Improve readability of Figure 4. (SR) Add improvement priority to Figure 4. (SR) 4 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan Pathway to 2040 CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA May 20, 2015 - Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan Pathway to 2040 Acknowledgements This plan is the result of the dedication, skill and effort of many people. The City of Stillwater wishes to give special thanks and recognition to the following individuals: Planning Commission Ryan Collins Jenna Fletcher Sean Hade Eric Hansen Cameron Kelly Michael Kocon Chris Lauer Gim Middleton Anne Siess City Council Ted Kozlowski, Mayor David Junker Doug Menikheim Michael Polehna Tom Weidner Planning Consultant Melissa Douglas Cover Art Jane Dierberger Park and Recreation Commission Linda Amrein David Brandt Scott Christensen Robert McGarry, III Solveg Peterson Sandy Snellman Don Stiff City Staff J. Thomas McCarty, City Administrator Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Abbi Wittman, City Planner Shawn Sanders, Public Works Director/City Engineer Tim Moore, Public Works Superintendent Quinn Williams, Planning Secretary Beth Wolf, Engineering/Public Works Secretary Trail Mapping Pack 114, 5th Grade Webelo Den Table of Contents 1 .0 Planning Context 3 2.0 Vision and Guiding Principles 8 3.0 Goals and Policies 9 4.0 Existing Conditions 11 5.0 Needs and Opportunities 15 6.0 Proposed Network Improvements 21 7.0 Non -Infrastructure Recommendations 25 8.0 Implementation 26 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 1.0 Planning Context Stillwater is a vibrant small city known for its notable role in early Minnesota history, beautiful location along the scenic St. Croix River and historic, walkable downtown. The Stillwater Lift Bridge is a major landmark, crossing the St. Croix River between Stillwater and Houlton, Wisconsin. Beyond the riverfront, Stillwater is a truly diverse community. Residential neighborhoods range from downtown condominiums to historic homes to new housing developments. Commercial services vary from small storefronts to neighborhood shops to large shopping centers. The city's natural setting includes river bluffs, ravines and steep topography to the east extending to small lakes, gentle hills, wetlands and grasslands to the west. Part of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area and the county seat for Washington County, Stillwater borders the state of Wisconsin to the east. The predominantly rural communities of Stillwater Township, Grant and Lake Elmo lie to the north, west and southwest, respectively. Highway 36, an arterial connecting Stillwater to St. Paul and Minneapolis, lies along much of the city's southern border. The suburban community of Oak Park Heights directly abuts Stillwater to the southeast and extends along the south side of Highway 36. The Highway 36 corridor in both Stillwater and Oak Park Heights is developed predominantly with auto -oriented commercial areas and office buildings. A new St. Croix River bridge is under construction at Highway 36 with completion planned for 2016. DOWNTOWN STILLWATER AND THE LIFT BRIDGE 1.1 Benefits of Community Trails Stillwater has long recognized trails and pathways as important community connections. Early development included stairs and sidewalks that traversed ravines and bluffs to connect housing to lumber mills and businesses along Main Street. Stillwater's trail and sidewalk system continues to provide many benefits to residents and visitors: • Offers affordable, close -to - home recreation for individuals and families. ■ Builds a sense of community by bringing people together. • Preserves character and natural heritage, offering people a new way to discover the special places within their community. • Provides safe transportation routes to walk or bike to work, school and local stores. ■ Improves community health by promoting active transportation. • Creates an economic development tool for attracting tourists and new businesses and maintaining residential property values. • Allows people of all ages and abilities to experience the outdoors and to learn about the natural world. • Connects open space and natural areas to create habitat corridors for wildlife. 1.2 Changing Conditions and Related Plans Formal trail planning in Stillwater began with the city's 1918 Comprehensive Plan and remains on -going. The most recent trail plan was adopted in 2000 "to develop and maintain a city-wide interconnected network of trails to provide valuable recreational and transportation opportunities for city residents and visitors." Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 �0 This update to the city's trail plan was prompted by two major additions to the regional trail system connecting to downtown Stillwater: the Brown's Creek Trail completed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in 2014 and the Loop Trail under construction as part of the St. Croix River crossing at Highway 36. Together, these two new regional trails add over 10 miles of scenic, dedicated hiking and biking trails centered on downtown Stillwater. This Trails Master Plan builds not only on the previous trail plan but on continuing local, regional and state planning efforts (see References). Stillwater's 2008 Comprehensive Plan acknowledged the importance of providing an accessible, safe and attractive trail system with the riverfront as the focus of the open space system and as a significant cultural and historical amenity. To align this Trails Master Plan with the next Comprehensive Plan update, the planning horizon is 25 years -- from 2015 to 2040. The adopted Trails Master Plan will also provide context for the 2015 Stillwater Downtown Master Plan. STILLWATER STILLVIIVER • JR, HIGH SCHOOL _ . BEACH •Ri:WEY C,S,�L H,23 [‘oVASNING3ON a •G. S.A. H, 24 (WASHINGTON CO it v. ` HOULTON STILLWATER MUNICIPAL SAHGE OocXWALL, Slit 1.3 Regional Setting County, state and regional trail plans include future projects that, if implemented, offer the opportunity for Stillwater to serve as a central destination for a large regional trail network. Timing for these projects is not specified but many may be completed within the timeframe for this plan. These projects include: • Munger Trail System. The Willard Munger Trail System was authorized by the Minnesota State Legislature in 2007 to extend from St. Paul to Duluth. The system is being developed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and includes the new Brown's Creek Trail and the Gateway Trail that currently extends from St. Paul to Pine Point Regional Park north of Stillwater. The Munger Trail System is also complete from Hinckley north to Duluth and Lake Superior. • Gandy Dancer State Trail. The Gandy Dancer State Trail runs 98 miles from St. Croix Falls to Superior, Wisconsin, with about 30 miles in Minnesota. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation has proposed connecting the St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail to St. Croix Falls to extend the trail corridor to 130 miles. • St. Croix Valley Regional Trail. The Metropolitan Council recently added the Middle St. Croix Valley Regional Trail Corridor to its system plan. This proposed trail would extend south 7.4 miles from the new St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail at Highways 95/36 to connect to the St. Croix Valley Regional Trail in Lakeland. Currently terminating in Afton, the St. Croix Valley Regional Trail will ultimately extend an additional 20 miles south to Hastings, Minnesota. • Central Greenway Regional Trail. Washington County plans a Central Greenway Regional Trail from Big Marine Park Reserve in Marine -on -St. -Croix to Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park. In Stillwater, this trail exists along Manning Avenue, the city's western border, and connects to the Brown's Creek Trail. • St. Croix County Trail Connections. St. Croix County, Wisconsin was recently awarded a grant to complete a bicycle and pedestrian plan for the county. Priority trail segments identified for study include connections to the city of Hudson and Willow River State Park from the St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail. GATEWAY TRAIL IN ST. PAUL Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 1.4 Planning Process Revision of the Trails Master Plan was led by the Planning Commission in consultation with the Parks Commission and the City Council. The process began by gathering information -- reviewing related plans, policies and other documents, doing site visits and mapping existing trails and pathways. As part of this initial information gathering, agency staff and stakeholders were consulted. After a draft plan was developed, public meetings will provide additional opportunities for input. After revisions based on comments and public input, a final plan will be revised and recommended by the Planning and Parks Commissions, adopted by the City Council and reviewed by the regional Metropolitan Council. Gather information. Review related documents. ■ Consult with stakeholders. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Develop draft plan. Identify needs and issues. i Develop vision and guiding principles. 1-1 Circulate draft for review and comment. —111 Develop final plan for adoption. Submit for Metropolitan Council review. 2.0 Vision and Guiding Principles Long-range planning can only be successful if a community establishes a vision and values (guiding principles) that outline its aspirations for the future. A vision statement establishes an ideal, developed with input from citizens, business owners and community leaders. Guiding principles expand on the vision by stating community values and priorities. This plan will guide trail and transportation planning for the next 25 years. The world will change over that time in ways difficult to anticipate. The vision and values establish the lasting framework for the community trail system and serve as a touchstone for making decisions, establishing priorities and resolving conflicts. The vision statement was developed through an initial visioning workshop and subsequently refined throughout the planning process. Build on Stillwater's history and natural setting to become a leading active transportation community and one of Minnesota's premier trail destinations. Community A destination trail system that serves the people of Stillwater as well as visitors, businesses and employers. Promotes tourism, job creation and economic vitality. Provides access to nature and understanding of the city's history. Accessibility A trail system that is easily accessed and accommodates a mix of users inclusive of all abilities. Information about the trail system is readily accessible and easy to understand. Safety A trail system that ensures safe recreation and travel for all trail users regardless of age or ability. Encourages activity and wellness. Connections A trail system that links neighborhoods, schools, employment opportunities, commercial areas, regional trails and public transportation and connects members of the community to each other and the landscape. Communication A trail system that educates and interprets the landscape and natural setting, uses technology to make information widely available and includes signage that is clear and informative. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 3.0 Goals and Policies The following goals and policies for the Trails Master Plan are consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan park, trails and transportation goals and are established based on existing conditions, Council and Commission recommendations and public input: 1.0 Develop a regional interconnected trail system with other local governments, the school district, Washington County, the Metropolitan Council, Wisconsin communities and Minnesota and Wisconsin state agencies. 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Develop a comprehensive trail system that traverses the community both east - west and north -south and links the local trail system to existing and proposed regional trails. Encourage regional and state agencies to promote enhanced design standards and coordinating signage for regional trails passing through the city. Coordinate local improvements with those of outside agencies. Promote compatibility on multi -use trail using proper etiquette guidelines. Advocate for future regional trail projects that expand and improve the trail network connecting to Stillwater. Serve many types of users through all seasons. 2.0 Use the trail system to connect significant environmental, cultural and historical amenities throughout the community. 2.1 Reinforce the riverfront as the focus of the downtown Stillwater trail system. 2.2 Maintain the historical and natural setting of potential trail corridors such as rights -of -way, ravines, open spaces and greenways. 2.3 Provide safe pedestrian/bicycle access to the historical district and the riverfront by connecting downtown and the city's residential neighborhoods. 2.4 Protect, restore and manage natural resources during trail development, use and maintenance. 3.0 Increase bicycling trips for commuting and local travel as a cost-effective, healthy and environmentally friendly alternative in the transportation system. 3.1 Expand and link the trail system between neighborhoods and work centers and local destinations throughout the city. 3.2 Where adequate, uninterrupted right-of-way is available, use separate bicycle paths to provide long, continuous routes for commuting trips. 3.3 Integrate bikeways, transit lines and pedestrian paths. 3.4 Route pedestrians and bicyclists off major or congested roadways wherever possible. 4.0 Make pedestrian travel fun, safe and enjoyable by developing a continuous comprehensive "walkable community" trail system. 4.1 Maintain existing sidewalks and add new facilities in residential areas where demand exists. 4.2 Ensure construction of sidewalks and trails in new development consistent with the adopted Trails Master Plan. 4.3 Complete sidewalk links in neighborhoods lacking sidewalks. 4.4 Provide pedestrian access to both active and passive recreational areas, as well as access to Stillwater's natural areas. 4.5 Develop and promote traffic safety and education programs. 5.0 Plan and construct a city-wide bikeway system to connect major activity centers, scenic open space, recreation areas and regional trails. 5.1 Include bicycle lanes on new and upgraded bridges, crossings and overpasses and the Highway 36 Frontage Road. 5.2 Require bicycle facilities according to the adopted Trails Master Plan as part of the development review process. 5.3 Provide trailheads, restrooms, parking locations and attractive bicycle racks at key locations including parks, downtown and commercial centers. 5.4 Establish and maintain appropriate use and safe standards and guidelines for bicycle facilities, programs and projects. 5.5 Provide adequate road width on new streets to accommodate bicycles. 5.6 Retrofit existing roadways to accommodate bicycles recognizing right-of-way width limitations where applicable. 6.0 Promote use of the trail system and make trail information readily available. 6.1 Develop and implement uniform signage for the city's trail system for safety and way -finding. 6.2 Increase awareness of the city's history and unique natural features using signage, maps, technology and other communication tools. 6.3 Promote economic growth by advertising the trail system to increase tourism, attract new visitors year-round and link to local businesses. 7.0 Ensure accessibility of the trail system in accordance with the spirit and requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 CHILKOOT HILL 4.0 Existing Conditions 4.1 Local Trail System Figure 1 shows the existing trail system that includes over 25 miles of paved trails, 57 miles of sidewalks and about 10 miles of natural surface trails. The City of Stillwater and the Stillwater Cross Country Ski Association together maintain over four miles of cross country ski and hiking trails in Brown's Creek Park and Nature Preserve at McKusick Road and Neal Avenue. See Figure 2, Brown's Creek Preserve Trail Map. The city has also developed maps and materials for pedestrian routes of historic interest (Historic Downtown Walking Tour) or for fitness (Step It Out! with Washington County). See Figure 3 for existing sidewalks. Stillwater does not have any striped on -street bike lanes. In 1972, the City Council designated a bike route along West Laurel Street, south on North Second Street, east on Mulberry Street and then south along Water Street. The route is poorly signed and not shown on the city's trail maps. Cyclists regularly use local streets, mixing with motor vehicle traffic. Serious cyclists train on the city's hills, most notably Chilkoot Hill, on Second Street S between Pine and Olive Streets. Chilkoot Hill with its 24% grade annually hosts the Stillwater Criterium, part of the North Star Grand Prix, reputedly one of the hardest races in North America. 4.2 Regional Trail System BROWN'S CREEK PARK IN WINTER Two new major regional trails extend from downtown Stillwater. The Brown's Creek State Trail is a 5.9-mile route that connects to the Gateway Trail at Duluth Junction. The new St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail connects the pedestrian/bicycle-only Lift Bridge with the new bridge on both the Wisconsin and Minnesota sides. The entire loop is 6 miles in length with 1.2 miles in Stillwater. Other significant regional trails include a segment of the Central Greenway Trail along Manning Avenue and the county multi -use trail along 75th Street that connects to the Lake Links Trail Network to the west. . "!L- fli ,. limn .0.. .1rt,, k .60 y.+i* .° i Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 5.0 Needs and Opportunities 5.1 New Regional Trails With the new Brown's Creek and the St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trails, Stillwater will become a regional trail destination. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources estimates 75,000 people will use Brown's Creek Trail annually. The Minnesota Department of Transportation did not develop use projections for the St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail but noted the trail has the potential to become a destination trail similar to the Stone Arch Bridge Trail in Minneapolis. A 2009 University of Minnesota study on economic impacts of recreation trails determined that Metro area walkers and hikers spent $289.5 million annually while bicycle riders spent an additional $137.3 million. This spending does not include visitors from outside the Metro region. Since both trails terminate in downtown Stillwater, they will bring new visitors to the historic district and patrons for local businesses. Other studies have shown that easy access to recreational trails supports and increases residential property values. Additional trail improvements and facilities are needed to accommodate these potential new visitors. The Brown's Creek Trail and St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail do not intersect. The city will construct a local trail in phases through 2017 to connect the terminus of the Brown's Creek Trail with the Lift Bridge and the St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail. Bicycle traffic must be routed and controlled to avoid conflicts with pedestrians and motor vehicles. Trailheads must be developed including vehicle parking and possibly other amenities such as restrooms or water stations. More bicycle racks will be needed as well as safety, BIKE RACK, DOWNTOWN LOOP TRAIL VISUAL SIMULATION interpretive and way -finding signage. Specific locations and design for these amenities within downtown will be further defined as part of the 2015 Downtown Master Plan. Outside of downtown, facilities will be implemented based on the adopted Trails Master Plan. 5.2 Local Bicycle Connections Stillwater has some wonderful existing trails such as the Lake McKusick trail but lacks a connected system for cyclists. Local streets have no bikeway facilities (such as bike lanes or bike routes). In general, Stillwater roadways are not bike friendly. There is a need for safe facilities for the family and average bicyclist. x z 0 W H z a U U 0 0 U Specific Streets. corridors Topography and traffic barriers prevent many people from riding. Steep terrain and existing development limit opportunities to connect the riverfront with the bluff top and make bicycling uphill more challenging. Parts of Stillwater are isolated by busy roads with on -street parking and no trails, sidewalks or shoulders. of concern include Highways 5, 36 and 95 as well as Myrtle and Greeley Bicyclists are forced to either take non -bike friendly roads or go out of their way to find a less traffic intense option. Especially for visitors, routes off of main roads are difficult to navigate. Existing motor vehicle traffic patterns are expected to change with the opening of the new St. Croix River Crossing. With closure of the Lift Bridge, through bridge traffic from the east and south will no longer travel through downtown or adjacent neighborhoods. Streets like Chestnut, Third and Myrtle are currently congested during peak weekday travel hours and on weekends. These streets may see a significant reduction in motor vehicle use, creating more opportunities for bicycle facilities. Available traffic projections and their associated assumptions are dated and unreliable. At this juncture, a wait -and -see approach is most practical for major investments in new bicycle facilities so that new traffic patterns can emerge after the new bridge is open. Flexible, lower -cost improvements such as pavement markings and signage are best suited to changing conditions. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan 15/20/2015 Climate also limits bicycle trips in winter months. With the advent of "fat tire" bikes (led by Minnesota companies Surly and Salsa) riding year-round has become more common and should be considered when developing and maintaining bicycle facilities. 5.3 Completing the Pedestrian Trail and Sidewalk System Pedestrian facilities in Stillwater residential areas vary depending on the era of development — some neighborhoods have sidewalks on both sides of the street, some neighborhoods have sidewalks on one side of the street and others have no sidewalks or sidewalks on major (collector and arterial) roadways only. Areas without sidewalks can benefit from their addition as part of street reconstruction projects. As new development or redevelopment occurs, sidewalks and trails should be required as shown on the adopted Trails Master Plan and implemented through the zoning and subdivision ordinances. Sidewalk standards should reflect differences in neighborhood character. One way to achieve that goal would be to link sidewalk standards to zoning districts. At a minimum, sidewalks on one side of all residential streets will be required in the less dense RA — One - Family Residential, TR - Traditional Residential and LR - Lakeshore Residential zoning districts. Areas with higher densities and smaller lots would have more use and need sidewalks on both sides of residential streets. Sidewalks or multi -use trails should also be provided in commercial areas and along any collector or arterial roadways. The city should have flexibility to tailor sidewalk requirements in larger planned developments. Stillwater contains large tracts of right-of-way and greenway corridors with little designated public access. Public access and trails should be established through greenway corridors such as the open space area around the east side of Long Lake where possible. 5.4 Safety and Accessibility Another concern is the degree to which existing sidewalks comply with the Americans' with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards. Many existing sidewalks do not meet these standards and should be modified or rebuilt if hazards exist over time as projects occur. ADA design standards should be met in new projects. Stillwater School District walking areas are currently one-half mile for elementary schools and one mile from SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL secondary schools. Stillwater has four public elementary schools, one public junior high school and three private/charter schools within the community. Walk boundaries vary from year to year and were 3/4-mile at the time of the previous trail plan. In any case, it is clear that most of the city falls within school walking areas. Providing safe and comfortable walking routes to and from schools should be at the forefront of future sidewalk and trail improvements. Law enforcement resources will be needed to patrol trails, parking areas and scenic overlooks. Public safety and public works staff will have on -going roles in planning, enforcement and education to ensure a safe trail system. Effective methods must be developed to communicate information about proper trail use, seasonal trail closures and trail etiquette. Public safety and public works departments should coordinate in the collection and annual evaluation of crash/safety data so that areas of concern can be identified and addressed as needed with the expected increase in use related to the new regional trails. z rx z H z 0 U F z 5.6 Mountain Bike Trails For all its outdoor opportunities, the Stillwater area has few places for mountain biking. The Stillwater Area Scholastic Cycling Advocates (SASCA) has proposed building a new mountain bike trail in Stillwater. Under the proposal, SASCA would enter into an agreement with the city to build and maintain a beginner- to intermediate -level mountain biking trail. SASCA would pay for trail construction and maintenance. Initially, SASCA proposed building a trail in Brown's Creek Park and Nature Preserve. However, bicycling is not presently a permitted use in the 2005 Brown's Creek Preserve management plan, and there is a Conservation Easement on the nature preserve property. The city will continue to work with SASCA and the state on project location, feasibility, construction and maintenance. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan 15/20/2015 5.7 Awareness and Outreach The intent of connecting trails is to increase their utility as transportation corridors and value as recreational amenities. Generating publicity for the Stillwater trail system will be important in building support both locally and regionally. To promote awareness, trails must be easy to find, access and follow. Trailheads should be well -signed and visible from main roadways. A system of way -finding signage is needed along with trail and bikeway system maps and other information at trailheads, on-line and at key community places. Since trails in Stillwater are a combination of local, county, regional and state trails, coordinated signage and a unique Stillwater trail system logo will help create a sense of place and promote community identity. In additional to trail and route locations, signage, internet and print materials should include itinerary planning information such as: • Parking options and directions • Location of amenities such as restrooms, points of interest, restaurants and lodging ■ Distance, difficulty and time for different trail segments ■ Special event information as available. The city should work with partners such as the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Washington and St. Croix counties, nearby communities, the Chamber of Commerce and the Visitors and Convention Bureau to promote and increase awareness of the local and regional trail systems. Annual user counts for the trail system will be vital to engage media, advertisers and grant - funding agencies, build support for new projects and to plan for needed infrastructure. 5.8 Maintaining the Trail System Proper maintenance is critical to the usability of a trail system. Due to budget constraints, Stillwater must plan carefully to provide appropriate resources to maintain the current and expanded trail system. Volunteers have been instrumental in supplementing City efforts to maintain and improve the trail system. Maintenance needs include: • Repair and restoration as needed ■ Enforcement of trail use regulations • Surface maintenance • Slough and berm removal • Drainage maintenance • Mowing and vegetation clearance • Structure maintenance such as culverts, switchbacks, retaining walls, wash crossings, overpasses, bridges, etc. • Sweeping • Litter and waste removal • Snow removal Snow removal is a complicated maintenance requirement. If trails are to be utilized year- round by pedestrians and cyclists, snow removal will be needed for some trails, meaning some adjacent areas will be needed for snow storage. In addition, snow removal may be needed to eliminate snow bank sight distance restrictions in some locations. Alternate winter time uses of trails such as cross country skiing or snowshoeing should also be considered. Stillwater Public Works has developed a snow and ice removal policy for sidewalks and trails. These guidelines should be updated as the system is expanded and uses change. In the downtown district, snow removal needs, roles and responsibilities have been points of on -going discussion. Resources (labor, materials and equipment) available for maintenance should increase as the system expands. To determine needed maintenance resources, the city should develop a maintenance program and schedule for the trails system. SNOWY DOWNTOWN STILLWATER Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 6.0 Proposed Network Improvements 6.1 Priority Improvements Figure 4 shows proposed improvements to the existing trail and sidewalk network. Having the base trail system well-defined facilities discussions with developers, county departments and state agencies and provides an opportunity for more favorable grant and funding submittals. This figure shows all proposed improvements, but priority facilities are listed below: Greeley Street from Highway 36 to Myrtle Street Off-street multi -use trails CR 5 from Willard Street to Brick Street Washington Avenue from Curvecrest Boulevard to Highway 36 Osgood Avenue/CR 24 from City Boundary to Orleans Street Owens Street/CR 5 from Wilkins Street to Sycamore Street On -street bike routes 4 I Brick Street from Myrtle Street to Pine Street Pine Street from Brick Street to Third Street S Fourth Street from Orleans Street to Pine Street Third Street from Pine Street to Laurel Street Chestnut Street from Third Street S to the Lift Bridge Laurel Street from Owen Street to Second Street N Second Street N from Laurel Street to Hazel Street Hazel Street from Second Street N to the Brown's Creek Trail Wilkins Street from Second Street N to CR 5 Croixwood Boulevard from CR 5 to Northland Avenue Northland Avenue from Croixwood Boulevard to 75th Street /CR12 On -street bike lanes Myrtle Street from Brick Street to Third Street S Highway 36 North Frontage Road Sidewalks Admundson Drive Olive Drive/CR 5 from Deer Path to Owens Street/CR 5 Owens Street/CR 5 from McKusick Road to Wilkins Street Trailheads North Main Street Lot Bridgeview Park Brown's Creek Park Highway 96 and Manning Avenue Crossings CR 5 at Pine Street Owens Street/CR 5 at McKusick Road Owens Street/CR 5 at Elm Street Other improvements Mountain bike trail at Brown's Creek Park 6.2 Specific Corridor Recommendations Highway 36. Highway 36 and the frontage road system serve as a major barrier for pedestrians and bicycles for Stillwater residents seeking to access commercial areas, parks and open space to the south. Related improvements for the new St. Croix River Crossing include a bicycle trail along the south Frontage Road that connects to the St. Croix River Crossing Loop Trail. No trail improvements were provided along the north Frontage Road. This Trails Master Plan shows a potential bicycle lane along the north Frontage Road. Installation will require restriping the north Frontage Road to eliminate the continuous center turn lane. The north Frontage Road lies within both Stillwater and Oak Park Heights and will require joint planning to complete this improvement as well as to generally improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities in this corridor. Highway 95. The city's previous trails plan called for a continuous bicycle path along TH 95 from Oak Park Heights through downtown Stillwater to the Boom Site. The new city and regional trails planned and under construction will complete much of this corridor. Remaining needs include trail heads, parking, bike racks design and location, snow removal and signage as well as a future trail extension to the historic Boom Site. These needs will be evaluated as part of the 2015 Downtown Master Plan in consultation with Stillwater Township and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. AERIAL VIEW OF CR 5 AND MYRTLE STREET County Road 5. Washington County is currently developing a plan for pedestrian and bicycle improvements for segments of CR 5— from Croixwood Boulevard to Owens Street and from Linden Street to Highway 96. The adopted Trails Master Plan includes a multi -use trail on the south side of Olive Street from Willard Street to Brick Street and a sidewalk on Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 the north side of Olive Street from Willard Street to Owen Street. Sidewalk and trail sections are also shown north of McKusick Road on Owen Street to Sycamore Street. Crossing improvements are urgently needed on CR 5 because of traffic volumes, adjacent residential use, nearby schools and major trail connections. The Trails Master Plan prioritizes improve pedestrian crossing operations and safety at McKusick Road, at Elm Street near Stonebridge Elementary School and at Pine Street near Lily Lake Elementary School. The city should encourage Washington County and Stillwater Township to develop access to Brown's Creek Trail from CR 5. 75th Street (CR 12)/Myrtle Street. This corridor appeals to motor vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians because it is a direct route to downtown Stillwater and the Lift Bridge from the west. Traffic volumes are expected to decrease with the new St. Croix River Crossing, but these reductions may be offset somewhat by new development in the city's annexation area. There is an existing off-street multi -use trail on the south side of 75th Street that terminates at Brick Street where 75th Street becomes Myrtle Street. Beginning at Brick Street, there are substandard sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the roadway. The volume and speed of motor vehicles on75th Street creates a barrier for pedestrians and cyclists. The Trails Master Plan shows an off-street trail on the north side of the roadway extending to Brick Street. A signalized crossing is planned at Maryknoll Drive in conjunction with the new fire station now under construction. The Trails Master Plan also shows an off- street bike route on Brick Street connecting to Pine and Third Street S to reach downtown. This route has gentler topography and much less traffic than Myrtle Street, but users generally prefer more direct routes to more circuitous ones. To that end, the Trails Master Plan recognizes the need to accommodate bicycles on Myrtle Street by proposing on -street bicycle lanes to Third Street. Cyclists could then follow the on -street bike route to the Lift Bridge and regional trails. Curvecrest Boulevard. Curvecrest Boulevard east of CR 5 to Greeley Avenue is a horizontally mixed -use area including commercial, office and industrial uses as well as high- and medium -density residential units. There are also a cluster of medical and social support uses including medical offices, a senior center, a rehabilitation facility and social service agencies. Consequently, this area has a high number of special needs users reliant on the sidewalk and trail system year-round to navigate between uses and obtain needed goods and services. However, the trail system in this area is incomplete, inconsistent and lacks adequate COURAGE KINNEY REHABILITATION CENTER crossings. Timely snow removal is a particular concern. Curvecrest Boulevard is currently overbuilt (four lane, divided with turn lanes) for its traffic volume. There is ample right-of-way that could be configured better to accommodate pedestrian and other trail users when it is time for reconstruction. Until that time, Community Development and Public Works should jointly develop interim improvement recommendations such as new trail segments where easements can be obtained or crossings to improve pedestrian safety and mobility in this area. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 7.0 Non -Infrastructure Recommendations Non -infrastructure recommendations include plans, policies and programs needed to achieve the vision, goals and policies of the Trails Master Plan. Many of these recommendations have been discussed in previous sections such as the need for joint planning efforts or coordinated signage for the city's trail system. All non -infrastructure recommendations are summarized on the table in Section 8, Implementation. One additional recommendation not previously discussed is the formation of a special advisory committee to guide implementation of the master plan. A special committee given goals, guidelines, parameters and restrictions could implement priorities consistent with recommendations of the Plan. The Trail Master Plan shows the system in general terms. The committee would need to refine the system looking at intersections, trail locations, specific trail widths and details of coordination within and through parks. The work of the group or committee should be coordinated with existing committees, such as Parks and Recreation and the Planning Commission. In addition, the committee can review financing alternatives and assist with grant funding opportunities. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 8.0 Implementation Implementation should be based on funding, priorities, and system connections. Recommended priorities and timing are shown on the following table. Priorities are listed as High, Medium and Low. Timing is shown as Near -Term (within the next 5 years), Mid - Term (5-10 years in the future) and Long -Term (more than 10 years in the future). The City has used a number of financing methods to support trail planning, construction and maintenance. Trail segments have been funded through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and some have been matched with grants. Funding trails through the CIP does provide an ongoing trail improvement program. Other trail improvements have been constructed as part of street improvements or in conjunction with new development. However, missing connections, where there is no existing trail or sidewalk and where the trail is a critical element in a loop for recreation or a major trail, need to be highest priority. Traffic volume can be used to help prioritize segments and also to establish priorities between sidewalks and trails where none exist. It is possible that some segments may be adequate for a considerable period of time and would receive a low priority rating. In addition, priorities will be affected by the available funding sources. Trail segments within the corridors will change over time, as some opportunities open and others fail to materialize. Therefore, this plan should be reviewed at least every five years and updated and improved as needed. Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Implementation Ite ,• ' ' Responsibilit " ., '-~ing Off-street multi -use trails 1 Greeley Street from Highway 36 to Myrtle Street Washington County/Public Works Medium Long -Term 2 CR 5 from Willard Street to Brick Street Washington County High Near -Term 3 Washington Avenue from Curvecrest Boulevard to Highway 36 Frontage Road Public Works Medium Long -Term 4 Osgood Avenue/CR 24 from City Boundary to Orleans Street Washington County Medium Mid- Term 5 Owens Street/CR 5 from Wilkins Street to Sycamore Street Washington County Medium Mid- Term On -street signed bike routes 1 Brick Street from Myrtle Street to Pine Street Public Works High Near -Term 2 Pine Street from Brick Street to Third Street S Public Works High Near -Term 3 Fourth Street from Orleans Street to Pine Street Public Works High Near -Term 4 Third Street from Pine Street to Laurel Street Washington County/ Public Works High Near -Term 5 Chestnut Street from Third Street S to the Lift Bridge MnDOT/Washinton County/Public Works High Near -Term 6 Laurel Street from Owen Street to Second Street N Public Works High Near -Term 7 Second Street N from Laurel Street to Hazel Street Public Works High Near -Term 8 Hazel Street from Second Street N to the Brown's Creek Trail Public Works High Near -Term 9 Wilkins Avenue from Second Street N to Owens Street/CR 5 Public Works Low Mid -Term 10 Croixwood Boulevard from CR 5 to Northland Avenue Public Works High Near -Term 11 Northland Avenue from Croixwood Boulevard to 75th Street Public Works High Near -Term Implemen •n I -., e _ a . -, ,...... im . , On -street bike lanes 1 Myrtle Street from Deer Path to Third Street S Washington County/Public Works High Mid -Term 2 Highway 36 North Frontage Road MnDOT/Public Works Medium Near -Term Priority sidewalks 1 Admundson Drive Public Works Medium Mid- to Long -Term 2 Olive Street/CR 5 from Deer Path to Owens Street/ CR 5 Washington County High Mid- to Long -Term 3 Owens Street/ CR 5 from McKusick Road to Wilkins Street Washington County High Near- to Mid -Term New trailheads 1 North Main Street Lot Community Development/Public Works High Near -Term 2 Bridgeview Park Community Development/Public Works High Mid -Term 3 Brown's Creek Park Community Development/Public Works Medium Long -Term 4 Highway 96 and Maiming Avenue Community Development/Public Works Medium Long -Term Priority Crossings 1 CR 5 at Pine Street Washington County High Near -Term 2 Owens Street/CR 5 at McKusick Road Washington County High Near -Term 3 Owens Street/ CR 5 at Elm Street Washington County High Near -Term 4 Myrtle Street at Brick Street Washington County High Near -Term 5 Second Street at Laurel Street Public Works Medium Mid -Term Other Improvements New mountain bike trail at Brown's Creek Park Community Development/ Public Works Low Near- to Mid -Term Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan 15/20/2015 28 Draft Stillwater Trails Master Plan I 5/20/2015 Implementation Ite esponsi' °"' iming Policies, Plans and Programs 1 Trail safety education programs Police/Admin Medium On -going 2 Way -finding signage development and installation Community Development High Near -Term 3 Stillwater bike route logo development and installation Community Development/ Public Works High Near -Term 4 Develop and distribute trail information signage, print materials and on-line Community Development/ Public Works High Near -Term 5 Creation of Bicycle Facility Committee Community Development/ Public Works High Near -Term 6 Downtown Master Plan Update Community Development High Near -Term 7 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Community Development Low Near -Term 8 Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Amendments Community Development Low Near -Term 9 Update Snow and Ice Removal Policy Public Works Low Mid -Term 10 Develop Trails Maintenance Policy and Capital Improvement Program Public Works Medium Near -Term 11 Curvecrest Boulevard Interim Improvement Study Community Development/ Public Works Medium Mid -Term 12 Joint Trail Planning with City of Oak Park Heights and Stillwater Township Community Development/ Public Works Medium On -going Figure 4. Proposed Trail Plan • heater Legend TRAIL Stairs Existing Trail Bridge Future Trail Natural Path Proposed Bike Route Proposed Bike Lane DRAFT Date: 5/1/2015