Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-05-04 HPC Packeti 1 1 t e r 1NE OIRTNFLACE OF MIMNESOTA AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North May 4, 2015 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of April 6, 2015 regular and recessed meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Case No. 2015-16: Design Permit request for signage at 1395 Curve Crest Blvd (Health Partners) Replace existing monument sign with new brand and clinic name. John Hollenbeck, Applicant. 3. Case No. 2015-20: Design Permit request for signage at 1500 Curve Crest Blvd. (Health Partners). Remove and replace existing monument sign to match current brand standards. Brian Paschke, Applicant. 4. Case No. 2015-22: Design Permit request for signage at 1900 Tower Dr. Lift Bridge Brewing Co. Replace existing awning with new logo and colors. Brad Glynn, Owner. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS - The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item. 5. Case N. 2015- 10. Continuation of Design Review for 911 Abbott St W. New home construction design. Ray Loida Jr., Owner. 6. Case No. 2015-18: Design Review for demolition and re -construction of existing home. Locate at 116 Harriet St N. Allison Boblit, Owner VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS VIII. NEW BUSINESS 7. Case No. 2015-17: Design Review for outdoor signage and facade improvements at 122 Main St S (Gammy & Gumpy's) John Daly, Applicant. 8. Case No. 2015-19: Design Review for addition of bedroom and bathroom at 520 Main St N. Monty Brine, Owner 9. Case No. 2015-21: Design Review for signage at 927 Churchill St W. (Health Partners). Review and approval of comprehensive sign plan. Brian Paschke, Applicant. 10. Case No. 2015-23: Design Review consideration and comment of Draft Cultural Landscape Field Guide. MN DOT, Applicant. IX. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION 11. Annual Preservation Awards X. ADJOURNMENT i I \vAter THE OIRTNPLACE OF MINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING April 6, 2015 7:00 P.M. Chairman Larson called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present: Chairman Larson, Commissioners Branjord, Goodman, Krakowski, Mino and Welty, Council Representative Menikheim Absent: Commissioner Johnson Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of March 2, 2015 meeting minutes Motion by Commissioner Welty, seconded by Commissioner Branjord, to approve the minutes of the March 2, 2015 meeting. All in favor, 6-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2015-15 Design Permit request for signage at 2000 Northwestern Avenue (Wells Fargo), located in the West Stillwater Business Park Design Review District. The Consent Agenda was unanimously approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2015-10 Design Review for new construction of home to be located at 911 Abbott Street West. Ray and Carmen Loida Jr., owners. City Planner Wittman explained the request. The applicants have requested design review of a proposed single family residence to be constructed at 911 Abbott Street West, a vacant lot located near Washington Square Park. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District, requiring an infill design permit for the new home. The Loidas owned the lot in conjunction with the neighboring parcel, 915 Abbott Street West, until that parcel was sold in 2009. The owners have been actively pursuing selling the vacant lot since then. As the lot has not sold, they are exploring the opportunity to build a new home on the property. Staff recommends approval with four conditions. Chairman Larson opened the public hearing. Robert Richert, 905 Abbott Street West, expressed concerns about the proposal. The subject lot is the smallest in the immediate vicinity, yet the proposed house would be the largest, making it out of proportion. He Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting April 6, 2015 believes the proposed structure will significantly impact neighbors and block sunlight from his home. He would prefer a 10' setback on the left side of the house as viewed from the street, which would protect the mature trees. He questioned drawings in the application materials and suggested that the applicants be asked to provide additional renderings that are consistent with the front view before a decision is made. Zachary Lee, 915 Abbott Street West, suggested rather than a larger setback on one side, it would be more equitable to neighbors to center the home on the lot, creating a 7.5 foot setback on both sides. He also is concerned about having bedroom windows directly across from each other, so he would like the house to be placed further back if possible. He also would like a wood privacy fence. Kathy Carroll, 922 West Abbott Street, stated the proposed house is too big for the neighborhood. Chairman Larson closed the public hearing. In response to Chairman Larson's question about changing proposed setbacks, Mr. Loida said they would be favorable to 7.5 setbacks on both sides of the house. Commissioner Mino commented the windows seem to lack uniformity. Mr. Loida replied that at the previous meeting, the Commission asked for additional windows. Chairman Larson reminded the Commission of the need for four-sided design. Commissioner Branjord noted it stands out that the three -over -one window detail is not carried through. Chairman Larson shared a concern about the general massing of the house which appears very blocky and inconsistent with the neighborhood. It lacks four-sided design. Side and back elevations are not consistent with the front. Elevations provided without scale make it hard to analyze. Mr. Loida responded that the roofline design is not locked in. He is willing to consider a gabled roof. Commissioner Welty said she too is concerned about the unbroken massing of the design. Ms. Loida said she has no idea what the Commission would want changed about the design. The proposed plans are the only ones they have found in eight years that fit the narrow lot. Commissioner Goodman noted that a four-sided design shows the use of the building and has attractive elements on all sides. Chairman Larson suggested the applicants may need to find a builder who can meet their needs and meet the needs of the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines. Motion by Chairman Branjord, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to table Case No. 2015-10, design review for new construction of home to be located at 911 Abbott Street West, to request more information on building elevations including building height and dimensions, with materials to follow around the building to break up the massing and make the design four-sided. All in favor, 6-0. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. Page 2 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting April 6, 2015 NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2015-9 Design Review for outdoor patio and landscape for REVE restaurant to be located at 200 Chestnut Street. John Wangen, applicant and Sonja Sorenson, owner. City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is proposing to create a patio area similar to that which is already located on the property. Proposed improvements include laying brick pavers in place of the asphalt drive -through and concrete areas. A new black iron fence will surround the patio area. The existing iron fence will be cut open to gain access between the two patio areas. All existing mature trees and shrubs will be retained. Two new shrubs will be placed along the edge of the sidewalk, and three shrubs will be placed near the edge of the parking area on the inside of the fence. Low shrubs, matching the existing shrubs, will line the curbed area. Three garden boxes and flagstone pavers will be placed in the existing grass area. Staff recommends approval with five conditions. John Wangen, designer/project manager with Preferred Kitchens, Inc., representing owners Carol, Matt and Nate Stabenow, informed the Commission that the Stabenows now control the entire level of the building. The proposal was inspired by the adjacent patio. It will eliminate the look of the three drive -through lanes for the former bank. The portable planter boxes will be 2' by 5' and 30" high. A bus station will be made of the same material to provide storage for bus trays. There will be 12 outdoor tables with four chairs each. Commissioner Mino asked about lighting. Mr. Wangen stated lighting has been eliminated from the plans. Low voltage landscape lighting may be done in the future. Motion by Chairman Krakowski, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve Case No. 2015-9, design permit for outdoor patio and landscape for REVE restaurant, with the following conditions. 1. All new pavers, fencing and plantings shall be consistent with the existing patio area to the south, located on the same property. 2. A detailed landscape plan, identifying specific plantings and placement, shall be submitted to City staff. 3. Prior to construction, plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. All necessary grading and storm water permits shall be obtained. 4. The outdoor patio area, including the relocation of an existing van -accessible parking space, shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department to ensure compliance with off-street parking requirements. The property shall be required to mitigate off-street parking requirements. 5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. All in favor, 6-0. Case No. 2015-11 Design Review for addition/expansion of existing building in which both tenants will gain added space located at 233 Main Street South. Mike Hoefler, owner. City Planner Wittman stated that the application has been pulled from the agenda at the applicant's request. Case No. 2015-12 Design Review of a wall -mounted sign for Stillwater Montessori located at 150 Third Street South. Marcella Kelton, owner. City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting approval of a single 30 square foot wall sign to be located at 150 Third Street South. The sign will be a chalkboard material, framed in wood. Painted chalkboard colors will read "Stillwater Montessori/Spanish Immersion/Education for Life/Join Us." The applicant is proposing to include the business website as well as a section where community education classes may be advertised. Business signs are not permitted to have a changing message, so that aspect of Page 3 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting April 6, 2015 the proposed sign would need to be addressed via a temporary sign elsewhere on the building. The single sign will be hung on chains from existing brackets under the soffit. It will be lit by a recessed can light also existing in the soffit. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Motion by Commissioner Welty, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve Case No. 2015-12 design permit for a wall -mounted sign for Stillwater Montessori, with the following conditions. 1. Total wall signage shall not exceed 30 square feet. 2. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the HPC. All in favor, 6-0. Case No. 2015-13 Amendment to Design Permit (Case No. 2014-41) for the Terra Springs Stormwater Revitalization Project. City Planner Wittman stated that in late 2014, the HPC approved a design concept for a Terra Springs Stormwater Revitalization Plan. Since that time, the development team has learned of site constraints that prevent the original Spools concept from being developed. The new design, known as the Reflective Pool, is similar to the originally approved design in that the pool will contain a circular deck and shade structure above the water. A pedestrian bridge will run from the north to the south side of the pool. Additionally, the entire area will have a vegetative buffer opposed to the existing brick wall buffer between vehicles, pedestrians and the water. Tom Whitlock, Damon Farber Associates, recapped some of the challenges of the project, which drove the design changes. The piers were disassembled when the original pond was created, then were re -installed. The perimeter brick wall will be removed as in the previous plan. New brick will indicate where the historic foundation was. Jeannine Kneubuhler, Terra Springs Master Board, added that the pillars were obviously not meant to be submerged so they have deteriorated significantly. Once the project is underway she is not sure how much will stay intact. They are in very rough shape and may have contributed to some of the sedimentation problems. They would be submerged in water and not visible under the new plan. Mr. Whitlock stated they would prefer not to retain the piers if possible, as they could puncture the liner. Motion by Commissioner Branjord, seconded by Commissioner Welty, to approve Case No. 2015-13 amendment to design permit for the Terra Springs Stormwater Revitalization Project, with the following conditions. 1. A detailed landscape plan, identifying specific plantings and placement, shall be submitted to City staff. 2. Prior to construction, plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. All necessary grading and storm water permits shall be obtained. 3. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. 4. Piers that were reconstructed may be removed at the applicant's discretion. All in favor, 6-0. Case No. 2015-14 Amendment to Design Permit (Case No. DR/2014-37) 119 Chestnut Street West. Jeff Anderson, owner and Roger Tomten, applicant. City Planner Wittman informed the Commission that since HPC approval of Case No. 2014-37 for the remodel and expansion of a garage in December 2014, the owner has modified the design. The new design is no longer consistent with the originally approved HPC design permit. Changes include: the eastern portion of the north facade will be changed by the addition of two bronze doors with stained glass adorning the windows; window shapes on the east facade will be changed, and a stained glass feature added on the Page 4 of 6 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting April 6, 2015 second story portion; the roofline will be changed to incorporate a vertical Victorian design element containing stained glass and a cupola; the two-story addition to the east will be modified from two single windows to three tall windows, one of which will contain a stained glass element; small square windows will top the linear windows. The height of this portion is proposed to increase. Where four identical widows were approved on the original submittal, the eastern -most portion of the structure will contain one stained glass window on the lower level and three smaller windows on the second and attic levels. Roger Tomten, Archnet, representing owners Jeff and Julie Anderson, reviewed the new design. The addition of the interior stairs drove many of the design changes. The existing stone foundation is the most historic element of the project. The owner felt the front entry of the initial design was a bit weak. The incorporation of Victorian artifacts will make more of an entry statement. Ed Hawksford, Hawksford Design, listed details from the original house that will be reflected in the garage: shingles, siding, wainscoting and other elements. Chairman Larson noted that previously, the proposed structure would not have been confused with the historic structure. The new design has more faithful adaptation of some of the original details of the house. He asked if anyone would be confused as to which is the original structure. Mr. Hawksford stated the new design is more of a playful adaptation; it is not meant to reproduce a Victorian structure. Jeff Anderson, applicant, reiterated that the revised design really reflects more details of the house. Motion by Commissioner Branjord, seconded by Commissioner Welty, to approve Case No. 2015-14, amendment to design permit for 119 Chestnut Street West, with the following conditions. 1. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. 2. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. All in favor, 6-0. OTHER ITEMS OF DISCUSSION Annual Heritage Preservation Awards City Planner Wittman solicited ideas from the Commission for the annual Heritage Preservation Awards. Scott Zahren Council Representative Menikheim noted the sudden passing of Scott Zahren. Chairman Larson, Council Representative Menikheim and the Commissioners recognized Mr. Zahren's significant contributions to the City and expressed appreciation for his many years of service. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Krakowski, seconded by Chairman Larson, to adjourn. All in favor, 6-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:53 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink Recording Secretary Page 5 of 6 iliwater 'HE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOIA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-16 APPLICANT: John Hollenbeck, Lawrence Signs, representing Health Partners REQUEST: Request for a Design Permit for replacement of an existing monument sign located at 1395 Curve Crest Boulevard within the West Stillwater Business Park Design Review District. ZONING: BP -I: Business Park Industrial COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Industrial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Design Permit for the replacement of the existing 'River Valley Dental Care/Stenberg Orthodontics' monument sign with a new monument sign to read 'Health Partners Three Rivers Dental Care/Orthodontics.' APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS Freestanding signs in the BP -I zoning district may not exceed 100 square feet for each exposed face and may not exceed six feet in height. The proposed sign meets the requirements of the zoning code if it is located no closer than 15' from the property line. The 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan design standards state that a landscaped area of bushes or flowers equal to twice the sign area shall be provided around the base of the sign. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the Design Permit 2015-16 as submitted with the following conditions: • The new monument sign shall be located 15' from the north property line. • A landscaped area of 57 square feet shall be maintained and/or created. • Substantial changes shall be review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Sign Specifications and Existing Sign photos HealthPartners Clinic 1395 CURVE CREST 3 RIVERS DENTAL PREPARED BY: Lawrence ign SIGN B 1395 RIVER VALLEY DENTAL CARE EXISTING COPY HEIGHT 6" 1 REMOVED WHITE HORIZONTAL LINE <(3 HealthPartners Three Rivers Dental Care HealthPartners Three Rivers Orthodontics 4-3/8" `T" PROPOSED Lawrence is. www.lawrencesign.com 945 Pierce Butler Route, St. Paul, MN 55104 651.488.6711 • 800.998.8901 CLIENT: 400. HealthPartners STILLWATER MONUMENT CUSTOMER APPROVAL NAME. DATE REV 1: 03.31.15 RR REV 2: 04.14.15 RR SALES: JH PR: DESIGN: IS DATE: 02.19.15 DWG: 6323 These plans are the exclusive property of Walker Sign Holdings Inc. dba Lawrence Sign and are the result of the original work of its employees. They are submitted to your company for the sole purpose of your consideration of whether to purchase these plans or to purchase from Walker Sign Holdings Inc. dba Lawrence Sign A sign manufactured according to these plans, distribution or exhibition of these plans to anyone other than employees of your company, or use of these plans to construct a sign similar to the one embodied herein, is expressly prohibited and will render the user liable for damages. Copyright 2014 © Walker Sign Holdings Inc. All rights reserved. 0 ELECTRIC 11STED SIGN PAGE: 0.2 iliwater 'HE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOIA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-20 APPLICANT: Brian Paschke, Serigraphics Sign Systems, representing Health Partners Stillwater Medical Group REQUEST: Request for a Design Permit for replacement of an existing monument sign located at 1500 Curve Crest Boulevard within the West Stillwater Business Park Design Review District. ZONING: BP -I: Business Park Industrial COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Industrial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Design Permit for the replacement of the existing 'Stillwater Medical Group' monument sign with a new monument sign to read 'Health Partners Stillwater Medical Group - Urgent Care.' APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS Freestanding signs in the BP -I zoning district may not exceed 100 square feet for each exposed face and may not exceed six feet in height. The proposed sign meets the requirements of the zoning code if it is located no closer than 15' from the property line. The 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan design standards state that a landscaped area of bushes or flowers equal to twice the sign area shall be provided around the base of the sign. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the Design Permit 2015-20 as submitted with the following conditions: • The new monument sign shall be located 15' from the north property line. • A landscaped area of 80 square feet shall be maintained and/or created. • Substantial changes shall be review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Sign Specifications and Existing Sign photos HealthPartners Stillwater Medical Group 1500 Curve Crest Boulevard, Stillwater, Minnesota SIGNAGE OVERVIEW PROJECT NUMBER - 45093 03/27/15 - REVISION 2 SERIGRHI SIGNAPSYSTECSMS 2401 Nevada Avenue North I Minneapolis, MN 55427 1763.277.7774 HealthPartners - Stillwater Medical Group -Stillwater, MN Site Details and Notes Required Equipment Special Conditions Code Check Landlord Check Additional Survey Requirements Add Costs for Winter Install * See Excel spreadsheet Demolition Notes If Stucco repairs are required, contact: Scott Kraus Kraus Stucco P: 763-234-8621 krausstucco@comcast.net Sign Location A: • Remove existing sign and scrap. • Posts to remain SPECIALTY CLINIC J Sign Location B: • Remove existing sign and scrap. • Repair holes in wall • Zoning Classification Signed Letter of Authorization (if required) Permit Process- • A Permit Will be Required even if we are: replacing the existing sign. • The zoning area is located in what is referred to as the "Review District" and the sign will have to go for approval of the Heritage Preservation Committee. • Contact is Abby Richmond in the Building Department, ph. 651-430-8825 • Permit Processing Time • Additional Requirements (if needed) • Electrical Permit for Illuminated Signs Permit Lead Time: • Maximum Square Footage Allowance: Power Requirements Site Specific Requirements 45093/C14370 Rev. 2 - 03/27/15 Health Partners Stillwater Medical Group Curve Crest Clinic Scale: NTS TVBP SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763 277 7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Sign Location: A Sign Type: C Double Faced Illuminated Monument Sign Qty = 1 as shown Sign A - Chosen Option 2 STILLWATER iM 1:1)1CA 1. GROUP I IL'.'rlllil'arfircr+ ( Existing Sign: 36.93 sq. ft. Side A (East Side) HealthPartners 41�4. Stillwater Medical Group URGENT CARE Existing posts to be covered by new sign. Verify conditions. Side A (East Side) 6 I/4" Option 2 New Sign Type C: Double Faced Illuminated Monument Sign 64% brand standard logo size 36.92 sq. ft. 71:ILL' ATER MEDICAL GROUP I Lail lil';iriflery I r,rr;j i Side B (West Side) HealthPartners Stillwater Medical Group URGENT CARE Existing posts to be covered by new sign. Verify conditions. Side B (West Side) 45093/C14372 Rev. 2 - 03/27/15 Health Partners Stillwater Medical Group Curve Crest Clinic Product Code CS Sign Type Typestyle Supplied Logo Copy Color See Construction Drawing Graphic Code Push Thru/Flush ❑x Logo ❑U/C 0U/1 ❑I/c Plaque Color Matthews Onyx MP31846 Plaque Mounting MM Installation Wall Material Existing Sign Foundation Frame/Backer Mounting Corner ❑Radius ❑Beveled Frame/Backer Color Power Requirements 277v Scale: 3/8" = 1' BP/TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. 111 0 HealthPartners - Stillwater Medical Group Sign Location r/ 1500 Curve Crest Boulevard Stillwater Medical Group 45093/C14373 Rev. 2 - 03/27/15 HealthPartners Stillwater Medical Group - Curve Crest Clinic Scale: NTS BP/TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.777 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-22 APPLICANT: Brad Glynn, Lift Bridge Brewing Companu REQUEST: Request for a Design Permit for replacement of an existing awning sign located at 1900 Tower Drive within the West Stillwater Business Park Design Review District. ZONING: BP -I: Business Park Industrial COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Industrial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Design Permit for the replacement of the existing green awning. The awning/canopy sign will be dark brown or black and read 'Lift Bridge Brewing Co.' APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS Awning/canopy signs in the BP -I zoning district may not exceed 50% of the gross surface area of the awning. As originally designed (shown right), the face of the awning/canopy is 56 square feet. So long as no greater than 28 square feet of the awning/canopy is covered by signage, the proposed faci- gymnastics sign will meet the requirements of the zoning code and the 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the Design Permit 2015-22 as submitted with the following conditions: • No greater than 28 square feet of the awning/canopy sign shall display the lettering and logo. • Substantial changes shall be review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Sign Specifications and Existing Sign photos (2 pages) jr131111Doe Jprvii40 co. 4/24/20015 Attn: Stillwater HPC Re: Lift Bridge Brewery Awning Sign Application We, at Lift Bridge Brewery 1900 Tower Drive W., would like to re -wrap and logo the awning on the front of our building. The awning is an existing building element which had the "Flips Gymnastics" logo on it before being painted over in all green before we moved in. The existing awning has lighting inside of it so that any white letters are illuminated. We would intend on keeping the illumination so that the letters of our logo were illuminated. The background color will be dark brown or black. Please see the images below of existing and proposed: Existing Proposed HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-10 HPC Public Hearing: April 6, 2015 APPLICANT: Ray and Carmen Loida, property owners REQUEST: Design Review of a future home to be located at 911 Abbott Street, a vacant property located in the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST AND BACKGOUND At your last regularly scheduled meeting the Commission reviewed the proposed design for an infill home to be located at 911 Abbott Street. At the time the HPC was concerned with the general massing of the structure and its blocky appearance, noting it was indicative of contemporary suburban design opposed to the more traditional residential designs. Additionally the Commission expressed that the roofs design, the side and rear elevations as well as the windows did not conform to the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines of having four sided design and being consistent as homes throughout the neighborhood. The applicant has submitted a Design Permit application for consideration of design review of a proposed single family residence to be constructed at 911 Abbott Street West, a vacant lot located near Washington Square Park. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and as such an infill design review permit is required for the new home. Ray and Carmen Loida owned the lot in conjunction with the neighboring parcel, 915 Abbott Street West, until that parcel was sold in 2009. The owners have been actively pursuing selling the vacant lot since that time. As the lot has not sold, the owners are exploring the opportunity to build a new residence on the property. DISCUSSION All infill homes in the NCD are required to follow the NCD design guidelines. These design guidelines serve as a common reference for all those involved in the process of new construction in the district including property owners, neighbors, residents, architects, designers, builders, city staff, and the commission. The Commission should discuss the following guidelines in relationship to the potential design, providing input to the property owner regarding whether or not this home fits with the NCD guidelines. Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. A two-story home is proposed. The two-story portion of the house is on the west side, neighboring the historic 1.5 story home. The single story garage will have a dormer on it to help break the massing to the east. The home to the east is single story. Resubmission Notes: The massing of the structure is brought down in the rear and on the west elevation of the home by the addition of a cross gable. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing to face the home set back 30' from the front property line which is consistent with homes along this street. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. A traditional gable roof is proposed. A cross gable garage roof with a dormer incorporates designed from traditional and post - war homes in the area. Resubmission Notes: The proposed cross gable at the rear of the home and on the west sides of the home is not carried through to the east facade. As such the east and north facade have a large, sloping roof design. Building height should be considered in choosing roof The height of the building is proportionate to the architectural style. 911 Abbott Street (Loida NCD Infill) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 2 of 5 forms, architectural style, and relating to context. Resubmission Notes: The height is exactly as proposed in the original submission. While the addition of a gable on the east and south elevations help bring down the massing of the structure, this design element is not carried around all sides. Building and site design The lot is relatively flat. The applicant has indicated one 2' in should respond to natural features. diameter ash tree will need to be removed. Preserve significant trees. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. No retaining walls are proposed. Respect the site's natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and retaining walls. Building Site Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. Front facing garages in this neighborhood are common. Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front. While the garage is front -facing, the applicant is proposing a front porch to help break up the front facade. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. The size and mass of the home is compatible. Resubmission Notes: The mass of the structure may still be of concern for the Commission. Please see the table, below, regarding the size of the home in relationship to adjacent structures. Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. The applicant is proposing a front porch which will project from the house, in front of the front line of the garage. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. No accessory building is proposed. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. With the exception of faux stone on the front of the house, the house design is carried on all four sides. Resubmission Notes: Though shown, the stone facade on the front of the home is not proposed for the final design of the home. 911 Abbott Street (Loida NCD Infill) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 3 of 5 Architectural Detail The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. The homes in this neighborhood are smaller and contain minimal decorative elements. Resubmission Notes: While the homes across the street are single story, there are 1.5-2 story homes next door and behind the proposed home. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. The garage and porch are proportional to the house, as well as with other homes in the neighborhood. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. The architectural details proposed are modest, which is consistent with this neighborhood. In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. The architectural style and materials is in harmony with the homes in this neighborhood. Use masonry and stone authentically. No masonry or stone is proposed. Home Size Table Structure House Footprint* Total Livable Area** Garage*** 911 Abbott 1110 2220 450 905 Abbott 1278 1278 576 915 Abbott 572 1312 624 912 Churchill 800 2380 768 904 Churchill 727 2426 462 916 Abbott 1342 1342 728 922 Abbott 1431 1541 240 928 Abbott 960 960 576 722 Everett 1188 1188 396 721 Everett 1188 1188 396 819 Abbott 900 2048 484 * Average home footprint -1039 square feet ** Average Total Livable Area -1566 square feet ***Average Garage - 525 square feet ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these two requests: 911 Abbott Street (Loida NCD Infill) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 4 of 5 A. Approve. If the proposed infill design review meets the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2015-10. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department for the May 4, 2015 HPC meeting 2. No stone shall be utilized on the front facade. 3. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 4. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your June, 2015 meeting. The 60-0day deadline for HPC action is May 19, 2015. If the Commission elects to continue the review of the propose structure, the Commission should exercise their right to extend the 60- day deadline. Staff recommends the Commission review the proposed modifications and take action on the proposed infill home. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Design Review Application and Checklist (2 pages) Site Plan Facade Elevations (May - 4 pages) Facade Elevations (April - 4 pages) Floor Plans Neighborhood Information Neighborhood Photos 911 Abbott Street (Loida NCD Infill) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 5 of 5 1 8 817 A �y iwa ter .., fi': I .�i" i - ,. _ s - y .•.. '•'.'y . `�. v . �' �.• y The Birthplace 911 Abbott of Minnesota Street CAI �-.' _ -.I �rl � i ll il wIII ■.a;_ `-- _ -- _ _-- - — — (a vacant Site 911 Abbott ? Parcel Boundaries ,N.1.. Municipal Location Street Boundary parcel) Li. !III' I _ 717 928r- — 922 r 716' t� W E I 71. 7.; 1006 = 721 722 1721 ., 0 55 110 S 220 ST k STREE Feet 7 -L ABBOTT 1 1 MEP WWI Ilse n 1 ITIMi. _ . ` �^ \- 1017f 1015 f 1 806 �H' f 1 W `' \ - 819 915 905 ppp((([[[�������.J C I1MMMMWME` L'E ®®-- ®q tits .,���. �"sl�Ogl • Yr1=1 i i ni: 11' usur E ILlll 111 � I iinn \ .. *A Iliy 850 nn IIIIII�®®"III16 .=/� �/ ��* �i ; -. 9112 _ — t' = .1��.=11111111111 roll el IN IIIL 111 I 11 Ili � I _®®®®'MME 824 Ai i�:- -. _. I �, 77.■D u. = ai Jili ii: CC "NIn N�LL� '1{�s ,� a : traa ! n: nm IMF �I :mum IV 1 {'� / -- - — - M —• I par .11171 aG TA 11-11 � � ✓' 1 1 11 PIMILMaei;;i _® 906 927 �. '' _.._.._.._.._.._.._.. 1 IR. 919 911 905 i •` 821 81 ,�`' �,� • �" .HE 939 a� jI,,,, i im6illlli 1 = PI . q ffiE �'�'I K} t 4 §y�f �� Yip` - g ' 1{ - nll la RP •' == r a �4, Q " � �- : :_. .9. •.... ., ....,€ . 1 •:, t _ y �I-s� k 'S • i v / � 92"t- _ I 812 : nl•■ d i�l ;o minn n.t R...nnn. , .0 AN :. t: —[ ,� T' Design Review Application and Checklist This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form Contact: Stillwater City Planning Office 651-430-8821 City Hall 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us Project Address: 9 r k.- is- Li 1.eighborhood Architectural Styles: cf Vernacular ❑ Italianate ❑ Queen Anne ❑ Gothic ❑ Greek Revival ❑ Second Empire ❑ American Foursquare ❑ Stick ❑ Other: __Aryl sit 2. Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback: (Guidelines #1, #2, #3) Prevailing setback on block (est.) 3 0 Average setback on block (est.) Proposed new house setback 6 3. Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1, 1-1/2, or2 stories high? (Guidelines #4, #5) Stories 1 1-1/2 2 House on right ❑ ❑ Ug'/ House on left ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ ❑ Prevailing opposite block O ❑ Proposed new house ❑ ❑ 4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your neighborhood: (Guideline #13) Front Posh House on right House on left House to rear Prevailing on block Prevailing opposite block Proposed new house a' ❑ Notes: None 1� 5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) Front Rear Side Garage Garage House on right ❑ ❑ House on left House to rear Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailing opposite block I Proposed new house rya' 6. Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) 1 stall Garage House on right ❑ House on left ❑ House to rear ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ 2 stall 3 stall GarGarage ❑ aCi ❑ //❑ �/d ❑ D' ❑ 7. Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house? (Guideline #14) 8. If the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighborhood and streetscape? : Stillwater Conservation District (p 1 of 2) Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist 9. Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property? (Guidelines #6, #7, #8) ❑ Structure sited parallel to slope ❑ Building deigned to reduce cut and fill (minimized retaining walls) ❑ Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes: V 1J 10. Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? 1 (Guideline #9) ❑ Types of trees ❑ Heights '2) O ❑ Trunk diam. 2' Notes: Good Neighbor Considerations 1. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunlight in adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) 1 l House to right: o House to left: o CHouse to rear: > Notes: Qc SNi .-&) St, -9--e- ` a How will yon mitigate any negative sunlight impacts on neighbors? ❑ Locate structure on lot to minimize impact ❑ Adjust building height, or portions of building, to minimize impact ❑ Other: Stillwater Conservation District 2. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines #22, #23) House to right: House to left: n House to rear: Notes: No How will you mitigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? ❑ Offset/locate windows to reduce impact ❑ Use obscure glass in window ❑ Locate balconies to minimize impact. ❑ Use landscaping elements for screening ❑ Other: 3. How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors?(Guideline #25) V Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property ❑ Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property ❑ Other: To be included with this Application and Checklist: U Site Plan: include location of proposed building(s) on property, lot area; indicate 1 j impervious surface, property lines, street/ �} sidewalk location and approximate location of adjacent structures. n icY'd ate proposed outdoor ceecio and landscaping features. U Building Plan: dimensions, first floor area square footage. U Building Elevations: indicate building height, windows, materials, and color on all elevations. Indicate proposed exterior lighting. U Photographs of site and streetscape. U Regular Planning Department Development Application Form Design Guidelines (p 2 of 2) [ s-c- o' S. i= • West Central Steel WOO CaMta Steel Inc. 201 I Weu Gorton Ave PO Ross 13'r8 Wilirnor MN %201 Phone 32D-23 437O 'toll Free 1400.99244853 Fix 32(1.235.1I31G ,5c. i 4a 13o'fLLb: M -Or DREAM SERIES L^�?� t{1 imosT FAMILY ROOM 13-I I"x 17E' 1 35' CAFE 9'A" x 12-7 GARAGE 19-3' 23'-7" ti GATHERING ROOM COVERED PORCH m u.) ts) s C 1[S 1r1 q , f(0 9 11 6 161, %DP 7aa p A �:� 0-- l* U 'RC 14 1a IV) 11 1111 IE i -......mmirsanasuMMINIMIK FAA 1 -I. if, _� HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-18 APPLICANT: Dan and Allison Boblit, property owners REQUEST: Consideration of selective demolition of non -original features (totaling greater than 20% of the front facing facade and roof) and a major addition to the structure located at 116 Harriet Street, a property built before 1946 and located in the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST AND BACKGOUND The applicanta have submitted a request for the selective demolition of non -original portions of the home at 116 Harriet Street North. The partial demolition of this pre-1946 structure includes greater than 20% of the front facing facade and roof, necessitating consideration by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The demolition plan is accompanied by a reconstruction and addition plan which will require HPC design review for consistency with the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines. DISCUSSION Demolition The selective demolition includes the removal of: • A single -story, enclosed sunroom on the west side of the home. • A single story porch addition on the east side of the home. • A single story, enclosed entry/porch on the north side of the home. The removal of the single -story additions on the north and west side of the home, as well as the change in the roofline on the north side of the home, trigger review of the project as a demolition. Reconstruction/Addition As indicated, the reconstruction and addition are required to follow the NCD guidelines. Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. The two-story addition to the west, the gable to the north as well as the front porch will increase the size of the home but will remain (roughly) in the same footprint has it has been. Large, two-story homes are not necessarily common in this neighborhood but this large home has existed on this large lot for over 100 years. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The house will maintain existing setbacks. Although a porch is proposed for the North facade, it will meet all current zoning provisions. Additionally, it will be set back further than the houses on Rice Street. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. The new roof design will be compatible with the existing structure, utilizing similar roof pitches and historical design elements. Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. The building will not be taller than existing. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. The structure's additions will be built where existing additions are located. The new front porch, on the North side of the home, will be located on flat area. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. Respect the site's natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and retaining walls. No trees are proposed to be removed with the demolition and reconstruction. No retaining walls are required. Building Site Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. No changes to the garage are proposed. Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front. No changes to the garage are proposed. 116 Harriet Street South (Boblit) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 2 of 4 The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. This large home has existed on this large lot for over 100 years. Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. A front porch is proposed to be located off of Rice, the front entrance to the home. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. No accessory buildings are proposed. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. Four-sided architecture is proposed with gable detailing as well as peaked windows, consistent with the existing architectural elements of this home. Architectural Detail While the facade of the structure is not necessarily compatible with newer, modern homes in this neighborhood, these guideline should be reviewed in relationship to the compatibility with the existing/original facade. The homeowners have indicated their desire to incorporate additions to this home to have as seamless a look as possible. It has been indicated similar materials will be used to the greatest extent as possible. • The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. • Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. • Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. • In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. • Use masonry and stone authentically. ALTERNATIVES, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these two requests: A. Approve. If the proposed demolition and additions/reconstruction design review meets the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2015-18. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department April 17, 2015. 2. Materials shall be similar as existing. 3. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 4. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. 116 Harriet Street South (Boblit) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 3 of 4 Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your June, 2015 meeting. The 60-0day deadline for HPC action is June 16, 2015. Staff finds the proposed demolition is warranted, removing non -original features of the home. Furthermore, staff finds the proposed addition is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines and compatible with the existing structure. Therefore, staff recommends the Commission approve the application the recommended conditions. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Design Review Application and Checklist (2 pages) Applicant Narrative (2 pages) Site Plan Site Photos (4 pages) Historical Photo Existing Floor Plans and Facade (5 pages) Proposed Floor Plans and Facade Elevations (5 pages) Elevation Models (3 pages) 116 Harriet Street South (Boblit) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 4 of 4 illwatet The Birthplace of Minnesota 116 Harriet Street SITE LOCATION Subject Parcel S 0 115 230 460 Feet tA.�Q��� �.unm Il.ru 11'1: !'r.!- 1i',1i111111 b elf ■� oir 11111 11111 11ll1111 ■111111111 ■u- .Ii I.= !lima IIII: ■111111 /111111111 111111 1111111111111 1111111 1111111: 1111 ®)ME Ai1-11■1111■111 m■ hl ■ Ihuu •.. le mu mI u■ u11111111 _■ I■ .■itji i11 0.1 'In ii .12 E. u i• ■r.r nIu] E' 1 MI —wasir i• 0: li 11111 471 7, i: it 111■11■1r�, �� - qr ■ IIII:rI ♦: ,� A .■ �� lk �` 11.■.� . �. P` Ill tali ■ �J�11► �nI" � ��I niuiuulunn i � y 3 \4't� jl I1 TTI] 11■1■I n lil ��----II ■If`.I� IAtt� �#rN iitiJ MMPt-',. MEIN" O itEil FA fill _.1 :1 IIL1 :1111 111111 11111 41111171 II 1111 ■OI 11111 11111! 1111 ■I. 111111 111 ■1■IIIIM 1111I1111I1R 11■�1111 M1•11 111 - fl 2.E ■111 IIl 1111 11. 11111 11111 11! Ell 4-41-1i1 MI= la ■: Ii is ea- 1 t Design Review Application and Checklist This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form Contact: Stillwater City Planning Office 651-430-8821 City Hall 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 www.ci.stillwater.nm.us Project ddress: i / /16. ar'"'c/' St,Ill ..5/,Y/tjci \ A lieant naAtetl address, te, phone: Yti t .It`-YYII /Soil // c+tli /7?6 not. Ale cu, s ihr�'17& tiJ'w S /2/7 1. Neighborhood Architectural Styles: 17( Vernacular ❑ Italianate tt(Queen Anne ' Gothic Greek Revival u Second Empire ❑ American Foursquare ❑ Stick ❑ Other: 2. Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback: (Guidelines #1, #2, #3) Prevailing setback on block (est.) Average setback on block (est.) ?$ Proposed new house setback 3.51 3. Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1,1-1 /2, or 2 stories high? (Guidelines #4, #5) Stories /� CI 1-1/2 House on right / y/J❑ House on left /V/ ❑ o House to rear o ❑ Prevailing on block ❑ ❑ Prevailing opposite block 111, ❑ Proposed new house ❑ ❑ 2 4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your neighborhood: (Guideline #13) Front Porc House on right ❑ A -- House on left ❑ House to rear Prevailing on block Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house Notes: None 5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) Front Rear Side Garage Garage Garage House on right AI%- a ❑ ❑ House on left /V/A a a ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on block a a Prevailing opposite block lg a a Proposed new house ❑ ❑ ENi , /lot PASd PraicC- 6. Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) 1 stall 2 stall 3 stall House on right House on left House to rear Prevailing on block Prevailing opposite block ❑ Proposed new house ❑ Garage Garage Garage ❑ ❑ a zr ❑ ❑ A., ❑ ❑ At 0 X ❑ 7. Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house? (Guideline #14) tde 5ACx 8. If the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighborhood d streetscape? : Stillwater Conservation District (p 1 of 2) Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist 9. Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property? (Guidelines #6, #7, #8) ❑ Structure sited parallel to slope ❑ Building deigned to reduce cut and fill (minimized retaining walls) Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes: 10. Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? (Guideline #9) ❑ Types of trees o Heights o Trunk diam. Notes: °OILS ‘, r la pr-e..St r -( c k t c wGV. Two Lrcc oak Good Neighbor Considerations 1. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunlight in adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) House to right: da House to left: N� House to rear: NO Notes: How will you mitigate any negative sunlight impacts on neighbors? ❑ Locate structure on lot to minimize impact o Adjust building height, or portions of building, to �v�'•ze impact o Other: Stillwater Conservation District 2. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines #22, #23) House to right: House to left: House to rear: Notes: N N0 How will you mitigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? o Offset/locate windows to reduce impact o Use obscure glass in window o Locate balconies to minimize impact. o Use landscapit}gelements for screening o Other: �1�} 3. How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors?(Guideline #25) Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property o Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property o Other: To be included with this Application and Checklist: ❑ Site Plan: include location of proposed building(s) on property, lot area; indicate impervious surface, property lines, street/ sidewalk location and approximate location of adjacent structures. Indicate proposed outdoor deck/patio and landscaping features. ❑ Building Plan: dimensions, first floor area square footage. ❑ Building Elevations: indicate building height, windows, materials, and color on all elevations. Indicate proposed exterior lighting. ❑ Photographs of site and streetscape. ❑ Regular Planning Department Development Application Form Design Guidelines (p2of2) Victorian/Gothic Renovation and Addition 116 Harriet Street North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Background: We are a young and growing family with plans to make Stillwater our forever home. We purchased 116 Harriet Street North because we fell in love with the house's history and character. It is our desire to preserve and restore as much of the character of the house as possible while adding conveniences necessary for modern living. We have assembled an exceptional team of Builders, Architects and Interior Designers to help us restore, repair, maintain original attributes, and add to the home with means and methods that will match, respect and learn from the original. The presented design meets the following objectives: • A new front entry, more obvious to visitors and guests, facing Rice Street. • A remodeled, updated and expanded kitchen to include a new south facing eating area with connection to the yard. • Replace an existing, non -original slab on grade addition with a new mudroom and everyday entry easily accessible from the existing detached garage. • Maintain the 3 existing bedrooms upstairs and remodel an existing small 4th bedroom to make it a legal and appropriately sized room. • Create a better full Hall bath to service the 3 kid's bedrooms. • Add a new Master Bath and Closet connecting to the existing Main Bedroom offering a private Master Suite. Challenges: This house has undergone years of neglect, various remodels/additions and other alterations that did not maintain the original character of the house. Our challenge will be to repair or restore what is original to the house, and remove, remodel or replace what is not. This design will assure that the additional square footage is added in a manner that is historically respectful and aesthetically in keeping with the original intent of the Victorian/Gothic structure. Solution: In a house with 5 prominent gables facing each direction, the design sought to extend the existing west facing gable to enlarge the small 4th bedroom and allow the new mudroom and back entry to be added in the same form below. It also proposes a new north facing gable which houses a Master Bath and Closet and aesthetically provides a counter mass allowing the existing west facing gable to be lengthened as needed for the bedroom. Without this new gable we felt there would be too much blank roof length facing the north. This new gable bookends the existing north gable setting up the massing for the wrap around entry porch with the new front entry door centered between the gables creating an obvious main entry. The new gable is set back from the existing paying homage to the East elevation, which is the other exterior elevation with 2 gables similarly set apart from each other. The new front entry is further achieved by replacing an existing slab on grade 1960's screen porch with a traditional wrap around, open railing porch and a new front door entering into a new foyer, recalling the original wrapping porch and entry when the house was entered from the bluff side. Attributes: • A new bay is added to the Living Room restoring an original bay found in historic photos of the original house. • Existing 1960's 3-season porch is converted into a more authentic sunroom with period proportioned windows, sided and trimmed with matching character. A new roof deck is added for the Master Bedroom with a traditional railing that recalls the original balcony/decks. • New Gable roof forms are extended or matched in pitch and include bracketing, fascia and cornicing details to match the existing where original. • Windows will be studied to ideally replace 1960's windows with quality double -hung windows with Gothic detail as available. • The house will be raised with new foundation or basement to improve site grading and drainage, removing all existing slab on grade construction. The foundation will be faced with stone or brick to match or recall material originally there. • Exterior and Interior materials and millwork including trim, railings, brackets and decoration will be restored or replaced with new materials to match the original existing details as able. • Mechanical systems will be replaced throughout the house bringing the new house up to date with the most current technology and code, including HVAC, plumbing and electrical. • Existing main level square footage = 1,727 s.f. We propose to add 140 s.f. to create the foyer, kitchen and mudroom (assuming removal and replacement of the existing slab on grade addition's square footage), bringing the new total on main level to 1,967 s.f. • We propose to remove an existing 180 s.f. screen entry porch and replace with a new 282 s.f. open wrap around entry porch. • Existing upper level square footage = 1,228 s.f. We propose to add 304 s.f. to enlarge the existing west facing bedroom and create a new Master Bath and Closet. Conclusion: While we are still early in this process, we hope that our intentions to maintain and restore this house's original charm are apparent. Much hard work and care has been put into the design and we sincerely hope that all of you on the Heritage Preservation Committee will support and approve our plan. With these improvements this house will make a great home for many, many more years to come. Let us make this investment toward the preservation of one small piece of Stillwater's history. Thank you, Dan, Alli and Ceci Boblit C. View to East Elevation Southeast Elevation East Elevation Existing Exterior details to be maintained West Elevation View to exisiting Entry Northwest Elevation View from Rice Street Upper Level Bedroom, windows to be replaced Stair Hall, existing character to be maintained View from Living Room to Stair Hall, existing character to be maintained View from Living Room to 3 Season Porch Existing Kitchen, to be remodeled 3 Season Porch, to be remodeled Den, to be remodeled Upper Level Bedroom with existing windows. Character of windows to be maintained Y I I (Th LOWER LEVEL PLAN Ai SCALE 1t4' = 1'-0' ■ SALA ARCHITECTS. ■ MINNEAPOLIS 326 E HenspN Ave. #200 MLvaap)4 MN 55414 TEL 16121379 037 F10L16121379-0001 O STILLWATEA e04 So. Few. Smer Sr SSDR1 Ea 351-0961 FAX: 16511351-732n xww.SAIAaruom VICTORIAN REMODEL DO NOT OETHMINE DIMENSIONS BY SUING OF THESE DRAWINGS aersr®.v p.a9,setiaa n V CMti w Project Number: r141 Project Architect: 7AIJL HLU1A ALA Drown By: to Date of Issue: 12r16414 aLISTUICI Sheet Al No. 1,6 ewarom+r.a,H mina „n.n. ENTRY R O R C N B A T X NOD ROOK/ LAUNDRY BIr- II FIi O E N CLOSET TS • MAIN LEVEL PLAN d-SEASON P O R C X LIV INS R 0 O N 1 ■ SA LA AICNITBCt0 e MINNEA POLIS DOD E L.,AEiAK ESAlr IL i141 IT-+/1ti j] III LLWA rut SW Saud.A.em N..a 1FL14511391.0•, AlS, v1�IIr' VICTORIAN REMODEL lAttla,—.Art. eat .4•1•Actee wan, Vo ACTACE ,•N_Ou0NSd4 Er SCANAG pet /NM OUMRW Project Number: i14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUA AIA Drawn By: PB Date of Issues 12/19/14 EXISTING Sheet No A2 w loam l ...•riralNl/ID I I: $EOROOM Na IISA\ ----I 0 UPPER LEVEL PLAN SCALE 1:d' F 1'4F CLOY BEDROOM 03 F Y 11 Liqsx CL04E7 I HALLWAY C L 0 5 . RERROOW Az 3 E 0 S Gila al ■ SALA ARCHITECTS WHIP MEARC LII 4262 NowAaN An. BADE Wwea.....AA ESA la *E: 1611J 174363' FAS IDI]T9-400i DSTIL LW A THE TEN Sala fawn M1Yr a<iwm.eDi.o: a: Imn:11la9•_, EASOSH raNASALJIOr...�m VICTORIAN REMODEL I o co 00 Z w Z LL1 < < W Ll.l Q < I 1— DO NOT DRENAI.IE NMBSW6Y SCIf R ALNG Off DRAWINGS gdaece Project Number: 114122 Project Architect: PAUL RUUSI. ALA Drawn By: PEI Date of Issue: 12/121114 EXISTING Sheet A3 No. EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/4' = SOUTH ELEVATION LEVEL ■SALA ARCHITECTS . MINNEAPOLIS 326 E. Nwespn Are. i#200 MTI T. 161213 JV-363)l• FAX: (612) 3)i{1631 O STILLWATER 961 Sou. Fa-1131 f SXR.•ev.... SSOS2 T. I1651I) 251-iiD wwwSALAarcmm VICTORIAN REMODEL 2 co 00 Z L"'„ wZ w< w wQ < '0 SCALING OFF THESE DRAWINGS Project Number: k14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM. AlA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 12/19/14 EXISTING Sheet No. A5 N...anrra,a.Go6 .a IVI 0/1.• SCALE: 1/4' = 1• 0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1l4' = NORTH ELEVATION ■ SALA ARCHITECTS . MINNEAPOLIS 306 E Mmnwwl+A2. #]00 MtromopoBs„NN 55412 1ri [612) 379-0037 NUL 1612) 379-0001 OSTILLWATER 9W Sou6 Fourth Shoal 5H6gN1, MN SSOe2 TEL 1651).1-0961 rAn (651) 351J327 www.SALAorcmm VICTORIAN REMODEL DO NOT DEMNwE DW@1510145 BY SCABNG OR 1163E DYAWINGS Namp wen.... wpm.. ILEA. CLIMACrrIt Project Number: C14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM, ALA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 12/19/14 EXISTING Sheet A4 No. SCALE:1/4. = 1'-0' LINE OF NEW PORCH ROOF BELOW LINE OF NEW ENTRY PORCH BELOW NEW GABLE ADDITION FOR BATH AND CLOSET NEW GABLE ADDITION FOR BEDROOM ABOVE EW MUDROOM REMOVE BEDROOM AND BATH N E W BEDROOM (12' X 14') EXTEND EXISTING GABLE END FOR NEW ADDITION LINE OF EATING AREA ADDITION BELOW UPPER LEVEL PLAN LINE OF EXISTING BAY BELOW II II I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I L a --_-I I I I ICI I II I BEDROOM #2 (11' X 16'-4") II L L === MASTER BEDROOM (16' X 15'-9") ASSUMED EXISTING VALLEY NEW FRENCH DOOR @ EXISTING WINDOW/ DORMER LOCATION CUT BACK EXISTING CEILING SLOPE TO ALLOW FULL HT. DOOR AT BATH SHOWER 11 11 II 11 II II II II — —I 01 11 BEDROOM #1 (11'-6" X 15') REMOVE MIDDLE WALL BETWEEN BEDROOMS LINE OF NEW BAY BELOW NEW EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING Not For Construction SA LQ SALA ARCHITECTS MINNEAPOLIS 326 E. Hennepin Ave. #200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 TEL: (612) 379-3037 FAX: (612) 379-0001 �STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 TEL: (651) 351-0961 FAX: (651) 351-7327 www.SALAarc.com W 0 0 116 HARRIET STREET NOR STI LLWATE R, MN 55082 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. USE OR PUBLICATION REQUIRES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. DO NOT DETERMINE DIMENSIONS BY SCALING OFF THESE DRAWINGS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED. SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT. Project Number: #14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM, AIA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 01/14/15 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 02/27/15 BUILDER REVIEW 04/17/15 CONSERVATION DISTRICT REVIEW Sheet /�/� 3 No. A3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" File: BOBLIT HISTORIC 18.pin • Printed: 4/16/15 O 00 NEW BACK WALK AND LANDING B A C 1< ENTRY I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 ENTR Y PORCH II I II II I I I I I II II 12.-0" 1 2'-7'/2" +/- MAIN LEVEL PLAN ULL OU PANTRY y EQUAL NEW FRONT WALK AND LANDING EQUAL n REMOVE 1 /2 BATH AND KITCHEN NEW POCKET DOOR DROPPED ■ PERIMETER SOFFIT REMOVE STOOP AND ENTRY DOOR REMOVE DOORS PATCH WALL REMOVE CLOSET TO OPEN HALLWAY NEW CASED OPENING TO MATCH EX. REMOVE EX. WINDOW NEW WINDOW @ NEW LOCATION EXISTING DINING ROOM EX. HIM NEW CASED OPENING TO MATCH EX. UP 17 R EXISTING CASED OPENING EXISTING LIVING ROOM REMODEL EXISTING 3- SEASON PORCH TO BE NEW SUNROOM ALL NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS @ SUNROOM LINE OF PERIMETER SOFFIT EVEL SUNROOM LOOR TO MATCH REMOVE WALL AND WINDOWS (NEW BAY) NEW EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING Not For Construction SA LQ SALA ARCHITECTS MINNEAPOLIS 326 E. Hennepin Ave. #200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 TEL: (612) 379-3037 FAX: (612) 379-0001 �STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 TEL: (651) 351-0961 FAX: (651) 351-7327 www.SALAarc.com W 0 0 . 116 HARRIET STREET NOR STI LLWATE R, MN 55082 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. USE OR PUBLICATION REQUIRES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. DO NOT DETERMINE DIMENSIONS BY SCALING OFF THESE DRAWINGS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED. SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT. Project Number: #14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM, AIA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 01/14/15 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 02/27/15 BUILDER REVIEW 04/17/15 CONSERVATION DISTRICT REVIEW Sheet 2. No. /� A2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" File: BOBLIT HISTORIC 18.pIn • Printed: 4/16/15 e - 14'-9' Z (EXISTING) 0 P P CONC. PIER ON FOOTING TYP. NEW PORCH ABOVE 1 2'-0" 14'-4" REMOVE EXISTING FOUNDATION, SLAB ON GRADE AND MUDROOM N CRAW PACE LOWER LEVEL PLAN L 1- REMOVE EXISTING FOUNDATION, SLAB EON GRADE AND ENTRY PORCH 8'-91/4 I i I I --- I 0 NEW I REMOVE EXISTING Not For Construction SA LQ SALA ARCHITECTS MINNEAPOLIS 326 E. Hennepin Ave. #200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 TEL: (612) 379-3037 FAX: (612) 379-0001 �STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 TEL: (651) 351-0961 FAX: (651) 351-7327 www.SALAarc.com w 0 0 116 HARRIET STREET NOR STI LLWATE R, MN 55082 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. USE OR PUBLICATION REQUIRES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. DO NOT DETERMINE DIMENSIONS BY SCALING OFF THESE DRAWINGS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED. SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT. Project Number: #14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM, AIA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 01/14/15 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 02/27/15 BUILDER REVIEW 04/17/15 CONSERVATION DISTRICT REVIEW Sheet Ai No. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" File: BOBLIT HISTORIC 18.pin • Printed: 4/16/15 NOTE: ALL EXISTING EXTERIOR MATERIALS INCLUDING SIDING, BASE, TRIM, FASCIAS, BRACKETS, SOFFITS AND CASINGS TO MATCH EXISTING OR BE VERIFIED. OWNER TO VERFIY IS ANY EXISTING WINDOWS ARE TO REMAIN. EXISTING NORTH GABLE BEYOND NEW GABLE ADDITION NEW WRAPPING ENTRY PORCH MUDROOM ADDITION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = EXISTING EAST GABLE BEYOND EXISTING EAST GABLE/DORMER NEW ROOF DECK NEW FLAT ROOF REMODELED 3-SEASON PORCH INTO NEW SUNROOM OPEN RAILING 1�1� 1�1�1�1 11i iiii,>f!f1f1•• gel.� I+If+.+ 1 11 IU 1�1:1:IU ALL NEW ROOF DETAILS A i TO MATCH EXISTING / EXTEND EXISTING ROOF LINE TO FORM NEW GABLE ADDITION MATCH NEW EGRESS WINDOWS NDA -STORY ADDITION III III III III I I III III II EXISTING ROOF EXISTING SOUTH GABLE EXISTING DINING BUMP OUT EXTEND EXISTING ROOF FOR NEW WEST GABLE UPPER LEVEL MAIN LEVEL tio 12 EXISTING MATCH EXISTING NORTH GABLE 12 . . NORTH GABLE END 12 'I. NEW GABLE ENTRY ROOF ALL VICTORIAN PORCH DETAILS TO BE DETERMINED API lL uAl 11 ALL NEW ROOF DETAILS TO MATCH EXISTING NEW NORTH GABLE ADDITION 12 NECK Not For Construction UPPER LEVEL flo NEW WRAPPING ENTRY PORCH MUDROOM ADDITION OPEN RAILING AND ENTRY PORCE MAIN LEVEL 2NORTH ELEVATION pd SCALE: 1/4" = 1' "0 SA LQ SALA ARCHITECTS MINNEAPOLIS 326 E. Hennepin Ave. #200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 TEL: (612) 379-3037 FAX: (612) 379-0001 �STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 TEL: (651) 351-0961 FAX: (651) 351-7327 www.SALAarc.com W 0 0 I_ . 116 HARRIET STREET NOR- STI LLWATER, MN 55082 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. USE OR PUBLICATION REQUIRES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. DO NOT DETERMINE DIMENSIONS BY SCALING OFF THESE DRAWINGS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED. SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT. Project Number: #14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM, AIA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 01/14/15 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 02/27/15 BUILDER REVIEW 04/17/15 CONSERVATION DISTRICT REVIEW Sheet A4 No. File: BOBLIT HISTORIC 18.pin • Printed: 4/16/15 NOTE: ALL EXISTING EXTERIOR MATERIALS INCLUDING SIDING, BASE, TRIM, FASCIAS, BRACKETS, SOFFITS AND CASINGS TO MATCH EXISTING OR BE VERIFIED. OWNER TO VERFIY IS ANY EXISTING WINDOWS ARE TO REMAIN. EXISTING EAST GABLE REPLACE EX. WINDOWS W/ NEW EGRESS WINDOWS EXISTING DINING BUMP OUT NEW BAY ADDITION @ LIVING ROOM WITH NEW DECK I) EXISTING NORTH GABLE END EXISTING EAST GABLE/DORMER NEW FRENCH DOOR @ EXISTING WINDOW/DORMER LOCATION NEW ROOF DECK - NEW FLAT ROOF UPPER LEVEL 4 REMODELED 3-SEASON PORCH INTO NEW SUNROOM MAIN LEVEL Not For Construction EAST ELEVATION A5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXTEND 2-STORY WEST GABLE ADDITION NEW 1-STORY ADDITION I EXTEND EXISTING ROOF FOR WEST GABLE EXISTING ROOF i» 12 EXISTING EXISTING SOUTH GABLE REPLACE EX. WINDOW W/ NEW EGRESS WINDOW 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: p5 , 1/4" = 1'0" N / / / EXISTING EAST GABLE END NEW ROOF DECK BEYOND NEW FLAT ROOF UPPER LEVEL 4 REMODELED 3-SEASON PORCH INTO NEW SUNROOM BEYOND NEW BAY ADDITION @ LIVING ROOM WITH NEW DECK MAIN LEVEL SA LQ SALA ARCHITECTS MINNEAPOLIS 326 E. Hennepin Ave. #200 Minneapolis, MN 55414 TEL: (612) 379-3037 FAX: (612) 379-0001 �STILLWATER 904 South Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 TEL: (651) 351-0961 FAX: (651) 351-7327 www.SALAarc.com W 0 0 I- . 116 HARRIET STREET NOR- STI LLWATER, MN 55082 THESE DOCUMENTS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND AS SUCH REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. USE OR PUBLICATION REQUIRES WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM SALA ARCHITECTS, INC. DO NOT DETERMINE DIMENSIONS BY SCALING OFF THESE DRAWINGS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, EXCEPT WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE SPECIFICALLY INDICATED. SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE ARCHITECT. Project Number: #14122 Project Architect: PAUL BUUM, AIA Drawn By: PB Date of Issue: 01/14/15 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 02/27/15 BUILDER REVIEW 04/17/15 CONSERVATION DISTRICT REVIEW Sheet /�/� 5 No. File: BOBLIT HISTORIC 18.pin • Printed: 4/16/15 ,:�iiitillP�!t�1 7 "11114,1. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-17 APPLICANT: John Daly, owner of Gammy & Gumpy's REQUEST: Design review of an unlit, wall mounted sign panels to be placed on the structure at 120 (122) Main Street South ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of certain facade improvements as well as a series of sign panels totalling (approximately) 16 square feet. The facade improvements will include painting the red facade antique white with a dark purple trim. The five -panel, wooden sign system is designed to work with the existing design of the structure's facade, opposed to constructing a single panel over the storefront, as encouraged by the guidelines. Two, (approximately) 1.5 foot tall by three foot wide panel will be painted white and inset in the existing beveled raised panel on the outer, rectangular panels. The lettering will be a mix of red, yellow, green and purple and read 'Gammy' and `Gumpys'. The three, symmetrical squares in the center of the facade will contain two character sketches as well as the ampersand symbol in yellow. Each of the five sign panels will be trimmed in either purple, red or green. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES The antique white facade storefront is consistent with other storefronts in the Downtown Design Review District. Additionally, the dark purple trim has been found consistently through downtown Stillwater. Wall signs are permitted by the sign ordinance at a ratio of one square foot per one linear foot of the structure, parallel to a lot line; this sign panel system will be approximately 16 square feet and the tenant would be permitted to have a total of 24 square feet. The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following guidelines: • Signage should be located in such a way as to not obscure any architectural features of the building. • Use painted wood where practicable. It is the authentic material and will look appropriate against the weathered brick of Stillwater's commercial facades. • Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. • The storefront sign should be used to display the primarily name of the business only. The Manual further indicates: • Materials: Use painted wood where practicable • Lettering: Choose a bold and simple type style and use it on all appropriate signs. • Color: o Choose subdued colors and dark tones in keeping with the Victorian tradition. Properly selected combinations of dark brown and green, black, off-white and gold are all appropriate. o Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. o Support brackets of projecting signs should be black. FINDINGS Staff finds the proposed signage conforms to the Downtown Design Review District guidelines with the exception of the Gammy and Gumpy sketches. Not enough information has been provided to determine whether they are consistent with the design guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval Case 2015-17 with the following conditions: 1. The total square footage of the sign panel system shall not exceed 24 square feet. 2. Individual sign panels shall be mounted on the existing raised beveled area. 3. Lighting for signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission prior to installation. 4. A revised sign plan shall be submitted to the Heritage Preservation Commission for review and approval prior to approval of any additional signage. 5. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Application Proposed Details (3 pages) 122 Main Street South HPC 20145-17 (5/4/2015) Page 2 of 2 *kw ems' j A /X/t-Yr HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-17 APPLICANT: John Daly, owner of Gammy & Gumpy's REQUEST: Design review of an unlit, wall mounted sign panels to be placed on the structure at 120 (122) Main Street South ZONING: Central Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of certain facade improvements as well as a series of sign panels totaling (approximately) 18 square feet. The facade improvements will include painting the red facade antique white with a dark purple trim. The five -panel, wooden sign system is designed to work with the existing design of the structure's facade, opposed to constructing a single panel over the storefront, as encouraged by the guidelines. Two, (approximately) 1.5 foot tall by fourfoot wide panel will be painted white and inset in the existing beveled raised panel on the outer, rectangular panels. The lettering will be a mix of red, yellow, green and purple and read 'Gammy' and `Gumpys'. The three, symmetrical squares (approximately 2.25 square feet each) in the center of the facade will contain two character sketches as well as the ampersand symbol in yellow. Each of the five sign panels will be trimmed in either purple, red or green. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES The antique white facade storefront is consistent with other storefronts in the Downtown Design Review District. Additionally, the dark purple trim has been found consistently through downtown Stillwater. Wall signs are permitted by the sign ordinance at a ratio of one square foot per one linear foot of the structure, parallel to a lot line; this sign panel system will be approximately 16 square feet and the tenant would be permitted to have a total of 24 square feet. The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following guidelines: • Signage should be located in such a way as to not obscure any architectural features of the building. • Use painted wood where practicable. It is the authentic material and will look appropriate against the weathered brick of Stillwater's commercial facades. • Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. • The storefront sign should be used to display the primarily name of the business only. The Manual further indicates: • Materials: Use painted wood where practicable • Lettering: Choose a bold and simple type style and use it on all appropriate signs. • Color: o Choose subdued colors and dark tones in keeping with the Victorian tradition. Properly selected combinations of dark brown and green, black, off-white and gold are all appropriate. o Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. o Support brackets of projecting signs should be black. FINDINGS Staff finds the proposed signage conforms to the Downtown Design Review District guidelines with the exception of the Gammy and Gumpy sketches. Not enough information has been provided to determine whether they are consistent with the design guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval Case 2015-17 with the following conditions: 1. The total square footage of the sign panel system shall not exceed 24 square feet. 2. Individual sign panels shall be mounted on the existing raised beveled area. 3. Lighting for signage shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission prior to installation. 4. A revised sign plan shall be submitted to the Heritage Preservation Commission for review and approval prior to approval of any additional signage. 5. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Application Proposed Details (3 pages) 122 Main Street South HPC 20145-17 (5/4/2015) Page 2 of 2 *kw ems' j A /X/t-Yr HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 5, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-19 APPLICANT: Monty Brine, property owner REQUEST: Design Review of an addition to the structure located at 520 Main Street North, located in the Downtown Design Review District ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant has submitted a Design Permit application for an addition to be placed on the north side of the structure located at 520 Main Street North. The addition includes a single story bedroom as well as an expansion of the first and second story bathrooms. DISCUSSION As the property is located in the Downtown Design Review District, the application is brought before the HPC for consideration of design review. However, the applicable guidelines for this project are more in line with those of the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD), which this property borders. Staff is proposing the HPC review the application in relationship to applicable Downtown Design Review District guidelines while paying attention to relevant NCD guidelines APPLICABLE GUIDELINES Downtown Design Review District Proportion: Single story additions are found on both residential structures adjacent to this residence. These types of additions were Break up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures. common of homes in the northern parts of Stillwater. The addition will contain three windows. The two lower windows will be of the same size and form as the windows on Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent structures. the existing house. A single, smaller window will be located in the second story bath. Material: The applicant is proposing to face the structure with the same materials and in the same color as the existing facade. An infill building and facade should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades (example: local brick or stone). NCD: Neighborhood and Streets • Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. • Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. • Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. • Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. • Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. • Building and site design should respond to natural features. • Preserve significant trees. NCD: Building Site • Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. NCD: Architectural Detail • The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. • Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. • Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. ALTERNATIVES AND RECOMMENDATION 520 Main Street North (Brine) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 2 of 3 The HPC has several alternatives related to these two requests: A. Approve. If the proposed addition meets the Downtown Design Review District guidelines, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2015-19. Staff would recommend the following minimum conditions for approval. 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department on April 20, 2015. 2. All new materials shall be similar to the existing facade materials. 3. The addition shall be painted to match the existing facade. 4. A building permit shall be obtained prior to the construction of the home. 5. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Downtown Design Review District guidelines, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your June, 2015 meeting. The 60-0day deadline for HPC action is June 19, 2015. Staff recommends the Commission approve the application the recommended conditions. ATTACHMENTS Site Location Map Facade Elevations Floor Plans 520 Main Street North (Brine) HPC: 5/4/2015 Page 3 of 3 lh PROPOSED TEt FLOOR PLAN us•r.v PROPOSED 2nd FLOOR PLAN rr-a•.a LFGRl! t6 WALLS TO REMAIN (NI RRL NBGNf WALL LLAN Isigm (E) WALLS PO BE REMOVED F (Et DOOR AND FRAME TO BE REMOVED INOLUDING ALL HARDWAREU.ON. I [ I 0 2' 4' B' SCALE : 04• • I'O' Ynt fJ� acisting Condition floor plan awtlorc ID A1.0 dale: 0I.20.15 7\ BACK (NORTH) ELEVATION ,�5. WALL SECTION lir AMNON MIAOW (\ RIGHT (EAST1 ELEVATION /' LEFT (WEST) ELEVATION ''J rc•r.P j see adnrier elevations 1 revYbrc 1D A2.O dole: 012.15 iliwater THE B I R T H P t■ r E OF MINNESO HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: REQUEST: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-21 Brian Paschke, Serigraphics Sign Systems, representing Health Partners Lakeview Hospital Request for a Design Permit for a comprehensive sign plan amendment for the structures located at 927 Churchill Street West ZONING: RB - Two Family COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR - Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting review and approval of a comprehensive sign plan amendment for Lakeview Hospital. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Generally speaking, no signage is permitted in the City's residential zoning districts. In 1991 Lakeview Memorial Hospital/St. Croix Valley clinic applied for a variance (Case 1991-48) to the provisions of the municipal code to allow for signage at their site. A provision of approval was that the facility would be permitted to replace and upgrade existing signage in their individual locations. Increase and expansion of the sign program was not permitted to reduce the impact to the residential neighborhood. In 1994 the comprehensive sign plan was amended and administratively approved (upon City approval of CPC Case No. 1992-32). In addition to certain directional signage and wall - mounted 'emergency' signage, the approval allowed for: • a 4' by 8' interior illuminated cabinet sign at the Greeley Street entrance • a 2' by 4.5' interior illuminated cabinet sign at the Churchill and Everett entrances • a series of aluminum cut letters on the brick retaining wall at the corner of Greeley and Churchill In 2005 a condition of Special Use Permit 2005-47 was that the HPC would review any sign plan changes and/or amendments. However, staff has not been able to determine if signage improvements have been made to the property since that time. 927 Churchill Street West Case No. 2015-21 (HPC: May 4, 2015) Page 1 of 3 Jijwate THE B I R T H I.I.A I: E Of- MINNESOIA APPLICATION DETAILS The applicant is proposing the following amendments: • Removal of three wall signs: Wall Sign A (not visible from street and size undetermined), Wall Sign B (approximately 30 square feet) and Wall Sign F (approximately 56 square feet) for a total removal of (approximately) 86 square feet of wall signage. • Addition of Wall Sign J (north elevation), an unlit 47 square foot sign. • Addition of Wall sign G (east elevation), an unlit 25 square foot sign. • Three monument signs at the Greeley, Churchill and Everett Street entrances are proposed to be redesigned. Each of the signs are proposed to increase in size: o Monument Sign C (Greeley Street) is proposed to increase by (slightly more than) one square foot. o Monument Sign D (Churchill Street) is proposed to increase by 16 square feet. o Monument Sign E (Everett Street) is proposed to increase by 16 square feet. • Reconfiguration of the Churchill/Greeley Street intersection signs (on the brick retaining wall) o The approximately 40 square foot aluminum sign is proposed to be replaced with a 27 square foot 'Lakeview Hospital' sign and a 20 square foot logo o The 'Main Entrance' and 'Emergency' directional signs are proposed to be cabinet -lit signs that will each increase in size by 8.5 square feet DISCUSSION Staff has determined there should be minimal impacts to the surrounding residential neighborhood with this comprehensive sign plan amendment. As there are no applicable guidelines and regulations for a comprehensive sign plan in this residential neighborhood, staff has determined increases in signage size and intensity are not warranted. As such, staff would recommend the following conditions of approval: 1. Monument Signs D and E shall be limited in size to no greater than 18.65 square feet. 2. The Greeley/Churchill Street signs (located on the retaining wall) shall not be illuminated. 3. Due to the total reduction of wall signage, the Greeley/Churchill Street signs (located on the retaining wall) may be permitted to increase by a total 14 square feet. 4. Changes to the approved sign plan shall require HPC review and approval. 5. No additional signs shall be permitted without amendment to the comprehensive sign plan. 6. All signs shall require sign permits. 927 Churchill Street West Case No. 2015-21 (HPC: May 4, 2015) Page 2 of 3 7. Any exterior lighting associated with new signs shall receive a design review permit from the Heritage Preservation Commission. RECOMMENDATION The HPC has several alternatives related to these request: A. Approve. If the proposed design review request is found to be consistent with approved sign plans for this residential district and associated variances granted, then the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2015-21 with, at least, the conditions recommended by staff, above. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with approved sign plans for this residential district and associated variances granted, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until June, 2015 meeting. Staff recommends approval of Case No. 2015-21 with the following aforementioned conditions. ATTACHMENTS Applicant Submission (9 pages) 1992 Sign Plan (4 pages) 1994 Sign Plan Amendment (3 pages) 927 Churchill Street West Case No. 2015-21 (HPC: May 4, 2015) Page 3 of 3 HealthPartners Lakeview Hospital 927 CHURCHILL STREET, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SIGNAGE OVERVIEW PROJECT NUMBER - 44960 03/26/15 - REVISION 5 447j0 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS 2401 Nevada Avenue North I Minneapolis, MN 55427 1763.277.7774 Lakeview Hospital - Sign Locations 4 .r COSId.c, $icie 111 0 fie • O Sign removed from packge 'h,-1".4414-4 titt 141( • 927 Churchill St CIF —►s Sign removed from package S Lakeview Hospital 927 Churchill Street West, Stillwater, MN Sign iemoved from package .4, 44961/C13765.6 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 Health Partners Lakeview Hospital Signage Scale: NTS TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone:763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 Irt These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Health Partners - Lakeview Hospital, Stillwater, Minnesota Site Details and Notes Required Equipment • Special Conditions • Additional Survey Requirements Add Costs for Winter Install * See Excel spreadsheet Demolition Notes If Stucco repairs are required, contact: Scott Kraus Kraus Stucco P: 763-234-8621 krausstucco@comcast.net • Remove and scrap sign. • Remove and scrap sign. • Patch holes in wall. • Remove and scrap sign. • Remove and scrap sign. Code Check • Zoning Classification: • Permit Processing Time • Additional Requirements (if needed) • Electrical Permit for Illuminated Signs Permit Lead Time: • Maximum Square Footage Allowance: Power Requirements • Add 120v & 277v electric to new illuminated sign locations LAK{EVIEY. I-I[1Sl`I1At. VA Oni Y' 511O PAflmN4 0 ators nA940a O50P OM! ":' .11 -- tt- • Remove and scrap monument • Remove and scrap sign and panel sign on brick. monument sign. • Remove and scrap monument sign. • Remove and scrap all signs shown. • Provide new 277v electric circuits and hook up to all 3 new sign locations. Landlord Check • Signed Letter of Authorization (if required) • Site Specific Requirements • Zoning Classification: 44961 /C13760.1 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 Health Partners Lakeview Hospital Signage TUBP SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serlgraphics Sign Systems, Inc. n 1-0 r 0 r 0 w N Sign Location: J Sign Type: A Flat Cut Aluminum Letters & Logo Qty = 1 set as shown Sign J - Option 2 Sign Type E: Flat Cut Aluminum Logo & Letters Logo at 64% brand standard size Sq. ft. = 47.4 sq. ft. 44961/C13765.5 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 Health Partners Lakeview Hospital Signage Product Code FCA Sign Type Typestyle Supplied Logo Copy Color See Construction Drawing Graphic Code FCA Logo ❑U/C x❑U/I ❑I/c Plaque Color Plaque Mounting FSM Installation Wall Material TBD Frame/Backer Mounting Corner ❑Radius ❑Beveled Power Requirements Scale: 3/16" = 1' TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763 277 7775 2 D r D 0 Frame/Backer Color N These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Sign Location: I Sign Type: A Illuminated Channel Letters & Logo with Raceway Sign Type's: G1 & H1 Illuminated Wall Mounted Cabinets Signs Qty of 1 Each as shown Signs I Sign Type G1: Illuminated Entrance ID Wall Sign with Polycarb face and vinyl stencil copy Sq. ft. = 17.84 sq. ft. F Main Entrance j 2° • Remove and scrap all existing signs. • Patch holes in brick with silicone adhesive. LakeviewHospital 22 Sign Type A: Illuminated Channel Letters with raceway 64% brand standard logo size Sq. ft. = 109.1 sq. ft. Sign Type Hi: Illuminated Emergency ID Wall Sign with Polycarb face and vinyl stencil copy Sq. ft. = 17.84 sq. ft. 44961/C13765.3 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 Lakeview Hospital Signage Product Code IWS & ICL Sign Type A, G1 & H1 Typestyle Supplied Logo, Myriad Pro I .. Regular(Track +14) Bold(frack + 50) Copy Color See Construction Drawings Graphic Code ICL, VS ❑x Logo ❑U/C x❑U/I ❑I/c Plaque Color See Construction Drawings Plaque Mounting MM & Raceway Installation Wall Material Brick Frame/Backer Mounting Corner ❑Radius ❑Beveled Frame/Backer Color Power Requirements 277v Scale: 3/16" = 1' TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Sign Location: C Sign Type: C Double Faced Illuminated Monument Sign Qty = 1 as shown Sign C `fir�►.5� ii 1- LAKE V I E W HOSPITAL FMEPGENCY REGISTRATION DROP OFF Existing Signage: 32.08 sq. ft. • .063" Formed aluminum skirt 50" 21" 98-114' Side A - North Face 96 1 /4" FIcalthl'artncrs Lakeview Hospital EMERGENCY z ,. 96 1 /4" Side A - North Face Not all brand standards followed for larger copy New Sign Type C: Double Faced Illumnated Monument Sign. Logo at 64% brand standard size with baby HP Sq. ft. = 33.42 sq. ft. 6 1/4" 50° 21" .ATTEN `NISI` P ill ' 14 riE IS RATI'©N DR OFF Side B - South Face H,•althl',u ultra Lakeview Hospital T Main Entrance 3 EMERGENCYz4.I Side B - South Face Not all brand standards followed for larger copy 6 1 4/ " 44961/C13762 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 Lakeview Hospital Signage Product Code CS Sign Type C Typestyle Supplied Logo, Myriad Pro Regular(Track +14) Bold(Track +'IS i Copy Color See Construction Drawing Graphic Code Push Thru/Flush ['Logo ❑U/C EU/I ❑I/c Plaque Color Matthews Onyx MP31846 Plaque Mounting MM Installation Wall Material Brick Frame/Backer Mounting Corner ❑Radius ❑Beveled Frame/Backer Color Power Requirements 277v Scale: 1/2" = 1' TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. Sign Location: D Sign Type: D Double Faced Illuminated Monument Sign Qty = 1 as shown Sign D I i l it 15 h III; ,Pi i Nti I r l., .1 Side A - West Side I KEV1EW HOSPITAL is i 11.1 11 (s I 1 it .N11.] "11L A,I. { .iti 11U i' i WOMEN'S MI' CENTER Side B - East Side Existing Signage: 18.65 sq. ft. 50" 100" 11 13F F F 1113/16' TBD (Ve ify) 50" 1113/16' F 1113/16" L TBD (Verify) Lakeview Hospital Health Partners 4 5/°„ Stillwater Medical Group • 3/4Z 927 Churchill Street West :3/83/4Z Side A - West Side New Sign Type C: Double Faced Illumnated Monument Sign Logo at 64% brand standard size with baby HP. Sq. ft. = 34.72 sq. ft. 100" Lakeview Hospital Health Partners Stillwater Medical Group EMERGENCY 3/4Z 3/4Z 927 Churchill Street West 33/8' 3/4Z Side B - East Side 4412 X 61/2" 44961/C13763.1 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 Health Partners Lakeview Hospital Signage Product Code CS Sign Type D Typestyle Supplied Logo's, Myriad Pro Bold(Track +150) & Regular(Tiaf:1= Copy Color See Construction Drawing Graphic Code Push Thru/Flush ❑x Logo ❑U/C I]U/I ❑I/c Plaque Color Matthews Onyx MP31846 Plaque Mounting MM Installation Wall Material Brick Frame/Backer Mounting Corner ❑Radius ['Beveled Frame/Backer Color Power Requirements 277v Scale: 1/2" = 1' TL fal SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. 14). 0 Sign Location: E Sign Type: F Double Faced Illuminated Monument Sign Qty = 1 as shown LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL `1Il1 SAll li \II l;I(Y11. I' WOMEN'S CENTER Side A - North Side Existing Signage: 18.65 sq. ft. Side B - South Side Verify with city if larger size sign allowed here. Also verify that new size sign will fit installation space. 50" 100" F 11 13/16' F 11 13/16" TBD (Verify) f 11 13/16' 50' TBD (Verify) Lakeview Hospital HealthPartners 4 5/8 Stillwater Medical Group Side A - North Side New Sign Type C: Double Faced Illumnated Monument Sign Logo at 64% brand standard size with baby HR Sq. ft. = 34.72 sq. ft. 100° HealthPartners 4 5/' Stillwater Medical Group Side B - South Side '41/2,1 x 41/21 X 6 1/2" 61 /2° 44961/C13764 Rev. 5 - 03/26/15 HealthPartners Iv_ Lakeview Hospital Signage Product Code CS Sign Type F Typestyle Supplied Logo, Myriad Pro Regular(Tracking +14) Copy Color See Construction Drawing Graphic Code VS ❑x Logo ❑U/C x❑U/I ❑I/c Plaque Color Matthews Onyx M P3.1846 Plaque Mounting MM Installation Wall Material Brick (Verify) Frame/Backer Mounting Corner ['Radius ❑Beveled Frame/Backer Color Power Requirements 277v Scale:1/2" = 1' TL SERIGRAPHICS 2401 Nevada Avenue North Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427 Phone: 763.277.7774 Fax: 763.277.7775 These drawings property of Serigraphics Sign Systems, Inc. I IIII SCALE f,III 150 GREELY STREET 1- SrPLAN REFER To MESSAGE SOI®ULE HINDER SEPARATE coven). 0 REF. TO 1 2 OF • • • • LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE ANALYSIS Message Schedule of Existing Signs Revised 9 August 1991 J.ocation Type Photo Faces Message 1 C P-1 D/F Lakeview Hospital Emergency Entrance General Parking Other Side of Building 2 G S/F No Parking 3 G P-2 S/F No Parking 4 C P-3 S/F Emergency 5 E P-4 S/F Emergency Parking Only All other vehicles Will be towed at owners Expense 6 D P-5 Emergency Entrance 7 H P-6 S/F Emergency/Patient Parking Only 8 H P-6 S/F Emergency/Patient Parking Only 9 H P-6 S/F Emergency/Patient Parking Only 10 H P-6 S/F Emergency/Patient Parking Only 11 G P-6 S/F .6. Parking Up to a $200 Fine For Violation 12 G P-6 S/F & Parking Up to a $200 Fine For Violation 13 H P-7 S/F Speed Limit 5 14 H S/F Speed Limit 5 15 G P-8 S/F Reserved For Doctors • • LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE ANALYSIS Message Schedule of Existing Signs Revised 9 August 1991 Page 2 Location Type Photo Faces Message 16 G S/F Reserved For Doctors 17 G S/F Reserved For Doctors 18 G P-9 S/F This space reserved Thursday 5:30PM-8PM For Cancer Care & I Can Cope Group Meetings 19 G P-9 S/F This space reserved Thursday 5:30PM-8PM. For Cancer Care & I Can Cope Group Meetings 20 G P-9 S/F This space reserved Thursday 5:30PM-8PM For Cancer Care & I Can Cope Group Meetings 21 F P-10 S/F Hospital Entrance 22 (NIC) A P-11 S/F St. Croix Valley Clinic, P.A. 23 (NIC) F P-12 S/F Emergency Entrance 24 (NIC) G P-13 S/F No Parking 25 (NIC) G P-13 S/F & Parking 26 (NIC) G P-13 S/F Parking 27 (NIC) B P-14 S/F St. Croix Valley Clinic, PA 28 A P-15 S/F Lakeview Memorial Hospital (Indirect Lighting) • • LAKEVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE ANALYSIS Message Schedule of Existing Signs Revised 9 August 1991 Page 3 Location Type Photo Faces Message 29 G S/F Parking For Hospital Visitors & Patients Only All other vehides will be towed at owner's expense 30 G P-16 S/F Parking For Hospital Visitors & Patients Only All other vehicles will be towed at owner's expense 31 G P-17 S/F Handicapped L� Parking Up to a $200 Fine For Violation 32 G S/F Handicapped Parking Up to a $200 Fine For Violation 33 B P-18 S/F Lakeview Memorial Hospital ilk VISUAL Communications 475 Cleveland Avenue North Suite 2 2 3 Ivy League Place Saint Paul Minnesota 5 5 1 0 4 612-644-4494 Fax 644-4289 LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE COMPONENT LIST 6 April 1994 Sign Type O uanti 1/001 1 2/001 2 3/001 1 I D A 4/001 1 L In A 5/001 1 Lo In As 7/001 1 Illu we As 7a/001 1 Illu nor Ad Entrance sign on Greeley identifies 'Emergency' directs to Hospital/Clinic parking' 4'-0" X 8'-0" interior illuminated cabinet brick base to match construction opaque background (dark green) 32 square feet Revised from original proposal Entrance sign at Churchill Entrance sign at Everett identifies entrance 1 side of sign on Churchill directs to 'Emergency 2 (2'-0" X 4'-6") interior illuminated cabinets brick base to match construction opaque background (dark green) 18 square feet per sign Revised from original proposal Corner of Greeley and Churchill xisting brick retaining wall ndividual painted aluminum letters to read: Lakeview Hospital St. Croix Valley Clinic P.A. irections to 'main entrance' and 'hospital emergency' dded St. Croix Valley Clinic' from original proposal ocated at building entrance in northwest parking lot dividual letters in hospital logo s originally proposed cated at building entrance in east parking lot dividual letters in hospital logo originally proposed mina ted 'Emergency' cabinet on st canopy originally proposed minated 'Emergency' cabinet on th canopy (2'-0" X 6'-0") ditional to original proposal A sign design & consulting group 3 �sasu.e I ; i LAKEVIEW YIEYY 4- Emergency II•ffi.5%W1.17.✓1! ,,1...rwl.r•n.'6.u:.as.'.a ocJ..a9. _e Si.r.r. _unan..•. satL•tl.. ere�1 a.wtl. h. al taeeoa+.R. /I'- • ',Barn mr7-... -iyelri6s+a rto s!urayawet. •a+•-6 .;•mot. 4. rlr..+lY I i CROOcke r y� 1f.111 �y�p}���t� �'• ' - __ W�i�G�Li1i [l.I.]1�1�yJlS4_.__ ___ r•�a��a-T' "•-i••aMei. 1p... .445�t-p ^P-�RMry. ilW - WF.R..el'- _) .AI 4f4K9.1 S-1•1IN'Jt d • S •. Nb-iH',b .0.s.cufa'Y-t'JaNdsx.pv+ii'".1.7f. �A re. �.rvae-�-•-w • l f-1.IVJ.jiW"f',-.�wtaa HOSPITAL 1 .cn'WAN tor ..sae.ea wvl�.b J -L� -- lebrf e•'b✓ .. a tin 'w..-..1C4 L:4t•Yc.Ji 7 'ram. !M1i• rne1YHG<f5•'w1.•�P.dl t I e:n not -awr 6..M t h• - pKo•C•Al II i.ri.tt.. • Nese-.Vd I.. uo.,v2w. j .4 ..ds r e �1•s•+� 460°GF.iP.4 !An A-AtRN.m d +.4C. 141+r•e3ceKt �^ 91. .16c44tw•'..t'. •.l•x'1s14N 11 r.aea:«r I i•-/ l�wmd MIT Je146. / 1, �(47Ls. c s. p. 1- • :KErrw. �'+-1-tr�.K'X...•iam. 6t.ix. real 16w6 r 11‘.t,�,. I1r.�Wf�t M(D fvI Us.3I 9..„rH 11a1M6a21t '. • 1 1 -+n� '�^-�»"..•SIHCFy y r Iwr ursC`rsa�-/.ar I I n,e.oa 6q.M.y- Y Emergency b6 - 7+tts.i•tt' wrranas y a3 f As, t Q..IrMea 1 01..K18 is -9Si.CERevti bt. fa_.o - 15i'h16.1 6....•d'?A6.14L aab2V1Y . wwrw.x LAKEV1EfW �MEMORIAL nos�[�L�l�P L RJCLL.J-f RY ETASSION roma AACKT_-cra - ml 111.. 5,2-.. Fe1.. •W. ?..t 1.i _ l®.aa. 3II Et! -. nal 111 i v 1 $' A L Lasokar.kalLame s S I., [gum -Mtn '„ CI.Clint A..a.• t'C16 I.la.).a2 Nia assets ! 2 1 ■ t 11-60.4•i4Si Ft. 6641,6219 _! 4{a l.isr. R natraliA4 6mP • lxta- vt..s•. 14.1.41 jti N1rennal S.Mt SBMAr. W •JTbI] a : i`a•at a.e.net x.... !Limo a t! C22l.?1 .V.M • 24 Hospital & eiinLc Par king 645166616513,... P643456Fee1+/aH F]"'91 biT 6l fl • L661Y". -1 6aereir men. ereigi 1,066.66 r.>H Ir no- ierys. ry6w- XMV`•1-6 •*sr/rE# vaara'u.'w1r45.4. vK6,1166it1. iA T e fe3L.66 16• 6:- •aGYn b.Z'6"344 9r1 • 697, - rr,�3r,•--.v ...t+L6EXIBIEV‘b•IMPCILMo6C4lD ▪ `alarws 1.rrrev 9.[,0�•( y��n1aF aL.l6r4Y.r. a +.eno. t=MBt 16151 4 ..23 MIL M rn area 1ai•# le.veo Iv • aaic6ad Mk nw aa�+o40•laaMrws�a 6 ✓ rn1.. aoa wo.o..e.00toi *moV•l bE 14 I1C} a•i1r l' . .e�wS•rNM We�0lf atm ir'4w aT,041•.w Me 0•6.1s] Y.6l MIMI MIN NM 6156511 R .Fra iiN.T0t0000.3.11r • EWE 6Y.1S .axso lab*. .6. . 11..I60oomq It P me yS i r16o10.1. Mal 3aas!laP6lp ▪ 9N.Gvs.Jo6o.ao.%drM i. We CG.a64 (P\R 1w~i x 'lr.a .6M /OM 1Moo w•Etn +s yseet NA. mu.. 9, ras SLAM OAKS i non ��: wins r 1r l / i1•611 E1606!'tri r' F46o6ir6il for o.g1.a1+o1 606466605.541 pFS.gig *Me oa3r 1.411 300e-t-v ype6 WPP61 r1 wM1 aO Ills ...as:+1.../4+-aausoa- 1:..1 �•` +9re: 1[�,�i�.�,�i11r 22'22 .11 r t i� SK.l5i9v�%ffl.v`vSCeVWnavAef ifx fYl��1.Or .. _.- IP gtl6..14•-i I..IEW I,iMOREAL HOSPA'AL ANCILLARY EXPANSION STAR IRcH[EcTS ml Sala 62.61. %he SIs Sari z..l aia...... 11101 IPj 731046 M 66614 +1•66 US a.r.l2er r weea.r V.jf. S61J1 Sao] sea we. 1 5 1 6 6 • i:t444-4324 E.1 464•6261 L.if. drfr6 a —S P6"T ]ri6 M..N.bi N E1fs x •.11.i6s Rfi..t !N.M. IN 1636. C9r6 i.s1e+1w 16.e6610 r-wgr.r 61 x..+de 6a S+N S:Y.11r4 YY 11131 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 4, 2015 CASE NO.: 2015-23 APPLICANT: MNDOT REQUEST: Request for comments on the draft St. Croix Crossing Field Guide PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner As part of the mitigation efforts for the St. Croix Crossing, MNDOT has been charged with creating a field guide to the area. In early planning efforts it was determined the guide would be a walking tour map. Attached is the draft guide for review and comment by the HPC. '(g dew) 3Ited .TauTllox SE aA.I S of J AT3 aqi ssotlE ygnoq Alp aqi puej o1 uotlaauuoa E p34Ea.za osje 11 atp punote uiotj sisunoi yqOnotq sanup 3Tu3DS puE agjetl altgoumyne .10J IiEMa1E2 paluaaa a. puq 1,jTl atp jo uoTlantisuoa aqs, •dirt aqi ioj Snagi !Elio -guano.' E o1 rettisnput uu tuoij uotitsuual aqy pa3lteu 1161 ut )IJEd jlaMo-j olut luoajaanta aqi JO u2isapat aqs, •tamp DILUOU033 Mau s1t SE uistanoy pue uotlEaaaaa paawtgma A11Enpea2 aaiEMl1TiS wag -aanTJ a1113o aauEteadde a111 SE gam se Xuiouoaa agl.2uilaasje `pasdejloa Atlsnput taqumi alp uagM s0061 'ijtua aqi ut sa2UEtla atreurutp MES t31EMlJTTS UJSunol Jagwni WOJd •2ugjnys ssatllEtu olut s2na palaAaat (Q deN of ZiOz uT paivaolat) asnogaIIM puu II?I,j (Ppogs utaisatag su `sgoCuio sit pa1Eata Aaisnput uioaj ajsuM alp uang •atnituanj oy .nolj mot3 `SaUT2ua uteais oy sMopuIM wag .auuniaEJnumu pue atnljnau2E gum `taluaa ssautsnq pagtstantp u sE pauioog aaTeMjjtlS •uMo101 aWTE3 SpEotjTEt sE pasEasaut ssaaae sup 's0L8t aqi /Cg •ataq apum slanpotd gas oy puE lsug aqi tuoij spool laS 01 ajgtssod 1t 2unjetu `Rutddtgs puu sassautsnq paytoddns osle uotlei.tod -SUE..11 taTEM of ssa3DV xTo.zD '1S ag101.I ATZj iddtssissry j aqi dn sasm.a leogtanu uo uotiuutlsap anbsatnlatd E aureaag aaluMlltis UMOI JeAIZj slum s,131EMllt1S o1 aantauMop S20I JO SUOTi1TUI paluog puu 'pains -eau' `paiaos `patois 8.31.0M atag •EatE 2ugpueq puu &etols 2oj luulaoduu Isom puu isatitua s,alEis aqi `(b demi) ails 'moll xlo.3 •is alp ye s.2oj paddols .a1eM 3q1 uo pa)jtoM OqM staa..oj—siapuay uioog •tueat1SUMop s2o1 aqi paluog gptou aq1 moaj uauitagtunj `uTEJ aqi g1TM asot janaj tams aqi ua4M `.2uuds aqi uj •na1eM qlq aqi uo pagat `tanaMoq `iitlsnpuT 2uuaquinj aqs, •sassautsnq pa2uuiep pue stajllas paunq yogi sapilspu1j pue .Sutpoolj oy pal Xpuanbatj sure Aneag `sip iijtua s,talw/Alj�1S uI adeJspue1 6ui6ualleuj •Mat.2 LTMo1 aqs, 'Hum 2ur mmado lug stUMo1 aril pauado stau11 ed stq puE 3jatsn)jaw uqof `stead Maj e utglTM „'StitmMes .10j uou1 nyns iaajtad„ e 1nq `UM01 E .0J .2ulllas reap! ue 1ou ataM sa1iln2 puu S UTAE.1 'q palaasstp ssjnrq dais aq1 imp paiou aantasgo Xltea auo •satitunitoddo .Sut3jaas puE EaaE aqi olut 2utgsnd ataM aldoad Mau `s008l pTUT aqi Xa sJailles pue sJneuaJdegu3 •satlunoq sit puE adEaspuut St11 Jo auluenpu .Sup1Ey snotieiaua Jo sptoaaT uayiuM siioddns aauapina lEal20j03E113tV •laaui puu duiea of aaujd luaiS E `aJtlplt' ut data pate uu sum lj •uaau 2uuag11v jetnyeu u sum yeti (a dew sE paveui `)lied taauotd ye put? `V se dem yasut aqi uo pa3jtutu `)lool.zano skirt aqi trtoJJ Matn aqi uT 1uapTna rips) utsiq atfq-1Moq E re .aaiMljt1S pal[ Mou st 111g1 uoT1Eaot arts, •1aATJ alp Aq pantea ssjnlq dais alp ysure2E dn SutSpa sauretd iissit.2 puE slsatoj asuapJo xtui E puno3—stoisaauu JTag1 puE `aMgtCO `t1ungo off `e1o)1EG 3q1—EaaE SIT ut aldoad istg arts, aldoad 1SJld •anllaayap adiaspuuj E .2uiaq aatlautd •ineagtu2tsut mats astMtagio Timm imp situp') ut sauois pug 01 ut.aq 1PM floi'__Sl[ITM 2uTlgtunta pue `stayin. `s3utnE.1 `s2uTplmq tnoi stgi uo Salts 3t11..SullTstn ig •ipts ututd ut paling 0.1E savoys asogiJo Auetu inq `aldoad puE aaildJo Aejdaaiut imp Jo uoissatdxa _reap Alutjnallted E saptnoid Atoms spiumlit1S «Eatu HE •jo saatnosat iitniuu aqi Jo asn puE of uotlildupE wetting Jo uotssatdxa ue •• se adeaspuej jetnljna e saugap aaist2aJ 1EuoTIEN a4I •saaEld auolsTH3o aaisOaJ 1Euop.uN aqi uo 2utistl aoj aigt2tra `1attls1U adeaspumrj letnllfD JaieMiitlS aqi Se tagia2oi paugap ate it Snuoj imp adeaspuer ritriu aqi puE atoa auoisTq sPyuMrrt1S sa4baspuv7 pa2iols ca. 1910 Jc !/2 the People have long used Stillwater's landscape to our advantage and shaped it to our needs. From the cool caves of the limestone bluffs to the steady river, discover the relationships between the landscape and the history of the city as you explore hidden features of Stillwater's Cultural Landscape District. ca. 1872 ,Cj 07 7120>'e z71101'71'LC To learn more about Stillwater's past, visit the Washington County Historical Society, 602 Main St. North, Stillwater (www.wchsmn.org). To find information about restaurants and accommodations, contact Stillwater Convention and Visitors' Bureau (www.discoverstillwater.com) and Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission (www.ci.stillwater.mn.us.). The publication of this field guide fulfills requirements of the Saint Croix Crossing Project. Historic photographs are used with permission of the Minnesota Historical Society. Secrets in the Landscape Uncovering Stillwater's Hidden History A WALKING TOUR Secrets in the Landscape O Ravines More than 10,000 years ago, a thick layer of glacial ice covered this region. The receding glaciers carved the steep bluffs and deep ravines that charac- terize Stillwater today. Natural and manmade activity shaped the ravines further. During the town's early years, street collapses and landslides were common along the steep slopes of the ravines. These accidental openings in the landscape and many of the natural ravines were filled to stabilize the landscape and create streets and building sites. McKusick House ca. 1932 Atop the natural bluffs in the North Hill neighborhood, the McKusick House was among the first homes built in the 1850s. From this elevated location, mill owner John McKusick could look southwest and see the McKusick Mill near the river. The bluffs not only provided a commanding view, but also created a barrier from the smoke and noise that the mills produced. Ca. 19( © Public Stairs Early surveyors designed Stillwater's streets in a grid with little regard to the steep terrain. Extensive grading during the early decades of the settlement did little to improve the problem. Residents created footpaths to shortcut some of the city's hills until the first public stairs appeared in the 1870s. These wooden stairways linked ca. 1873 residential areas atop the bluffs with the commercial district below. Wooden staircases were later replaced with stone and concrete. O Point of Land Flooding and landslides reshaped Stillwater's landscape over the years. In 1852, heavy rains overwhelmed the dam at Lake McKusick, causing a landslide. The landslide flowed through the Mulberry Street ravine with enough force to move trees, bury buildings, and destroy a significant portion of the town. Debris ca. 192, deposited in Lake St. Croix created eight to ten acres of new riverfront. New mill construction quickly filled the new acreage. 0 Union Elevator In the late 1870s, the Union Improvement & Elevator Company constructed Stillwater's first flour elevators at the end of the Stillwater & St. Paul railroad tracks. Hovering above the St. Croix River, the elevator easily transferred wheat from railcars to barges. At its peak, the elevator stored up to 300,000 bushels of wheat. The entire elevator complex burned down in 1898, just a few years before the lumber industry collapsed. Only remnants of the brick foundation and chimney stack footings remain today. ca. 187.5 O Lowell Park Lowell Park didn't always look as it does today. Years ago this was a pivotal location in Stillwater's lumber industry. Imagine a place without sidewalks, landscaping, and the pavilion. Mills and factories rose around railroad tracks that ca.1920 divided the landscape. Following the decline of the lumber industry, the riverfront transformed. The initial development of Lowell Park in 1911 represented the city's new recreation and tourism focus. O Stone Levee The riverfront was bustling spot with steamboats bringing passengers, freight, and mail. An early levee constructed between Myrtle and Chestnut streets protected the city from flood waters. A stone wall at the river's edge reinforced the levee between Chestnut and Nelson streets after 1875. By 1900, sixty ca. 1871 years of accumulated sawmill waste covered the levee. Local lumbermen donated the land and, in 1913, the city began building a concrete seawall. O Lift Bridge Stillwater shifted from an industrial town to a tourism desti- nation focused on the river. The 1918 Plan of Stillwater was a blueprint for the town's new focus. The plan proposed new riverfront uses and introduced the idea of Stillwater as an automobile tourist destination. When the lift bridge opened in 1931, it became the center- piece of the "new" riverfront and a gateway to the city. The city completed the transition after World War II. This removed remaining industrial buildings, repurposed historic buildings along Main Street, and developed the scenic landscape as an attraction. 0 Freight House ca. 1931 Rough roads and steamboats were the only way to reach Stillwater until construction of the Stillwater & St. Paul Railroad in 1867. The railroad provided reliable transpor- tation for industry and secured Stillwater's position as a lumber center. Built in 1883, the Freight House bridged the two forms of transportation, connecting both with riverboats and railroads that ran alongside the river. ca. 1976 QBrewing and Caves Conditioning and storing beer requires consistently cool temperatures. In the era before refrigeration, caves offered this benefit for free. The Joseph Wolf Brewery, estab- lished on this site in the late 1800s, used the natural caves in the bluff to its advantage (The Schmickle Brewery did the same about 1/2 mile south and the Buster Brewery used the caves at the north end of downtown.) At its peak, this brewery produced more than 5,000 barrels of beer per year. 0 Retaining Walls ca. 1912 Gray and buff colored limestone is a prominent feature of Stillwater. Stone quarries opened throughout the city soon after settlement. One of the most common uses for limestone was to secure edges of steep streets. Wooden pickets capped some of the limestone retaining walls. Others featured wrought- or cast-iron fences. Retaining walls ca. 1888 respond to the landscape some are just a few layers of stone while others reach several feet high. You can still see many of these walls today. ® Slab Alley Slab Alley, a two -block row of about 20 dwellings built in the 1870s, accommodated seasonal lumber workers and their families. The name may have derived from the lumber, or "slabs," piled around a lumber mill. The neighborhood lined the bluffs across Main Street from the Hersey & Bean Lumber Company. A road widening project demolished the neighborhood in 1932. Archeological investigations from 2004 to 2005 studied Slab Alley's working class population during the height of the lumbering industry. ® Local Clay, Local Bricks ca. 1932 The young town needed building materials to grow. Fortunately, on the south end of town, nature provided good clay for bricks. Frederick Steinacker opened the first brickyard in Stillwater in 1859. At its peak, Steinacker's brickyard manufactured about 200,000 bricks per year, mining the clay, molding, drying, and firing at Lily Lake. Because local clays turned yellow during the firing process, they stood out from imported bricks. Look for them throughout downtown, and here at 112 Main Street. dale unknown QEngineering Few water resources could compare with Stillwater's spring -fed creeks. The city's engineering office began devel- oping plans in the 1870s to take advantage of this natural resource. During the following years, the city channelized, straightened, and deepened the ravines and creeks. Lake McKusick became the city's drinking water reservoir, while Brown's Creek closed after years of powering early mills. Buildings covered several creeks in downtown Stillwater. The city's modern sewer system is an extension of this early water distri- bution system. ca. 1922